Slashdot Mirror


Fun Things To Do With a Math Or Science Degree?

bxwatso writes "My niece just took the ACT and got a perfect score on the math section. 25 years ago, when I took the test, the kids who aced the math section were pretty special. Her score, combined with straight A's so far in high school, suggest to me that she might be able to go to a top university (MIT?) based on her math aptitude. The rub is that she doesn't like math or science, even though she finds them easy. She doesn't want to be an engineer or scientist. I thought the folks here would be a great group to ask: What are some creative, not too nerdy professions that nonetheless require a talent for math, engineering, or science?"

366 of 564 comments (clear)

  1. Be a teacher by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My first girlfriend have like a perfect score (not just math, but 36 composite score) and are ranked in the top 5 in our class across 500+ students. She got a B.A. in elementary education last year. Probably an influence from her pastor.

    1. Re:Be a teacher by ushering05401 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Check out marketing positions for the types of companies in the fields you have probably already identified as good prospects.

      Public speaking, preparing/delivering glossy presentations, personal interactions with all sorts of people made possible by the ability to discuss product applications or service capabilities in finite technical detail. International travel on the company dime.

      After all, if she is not designing or using the product she will only need a level of technical knowledge that is 'easy' for a person like her to grasp and the ability to have an intelligent conversation.

      I have a cousin who does something along these lines. She parlayed her technical skills into a non-technical marketing position with sweet benefits and travel to sweet locales.

      If she is interested in this field buy her Mitnick's books and make sure she is aware that social engineering is not just a code word for lying. And make sure she understands that marketing and sales are not the same thing! There are guerrilla marketing books that might catch her interest too, though i can't recall titles atm.

    2. Re:Be a teacher by lysergic.acid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      what does "elementary education" have to do with math or science degrees?

      in any case, if the ACTs are anything like the SATs then they're more of an indicator of general academic aptitude (including test-taking skills) rather than a measure of math ability, writing ability, etc. that's not to say that getting a perfect SAT/ACT score isn't impressive, and there's certainly a correlation between good students and good SAT/ACT scores. but they're not an indicator of intelligence--though they might be an indicator of college-preparedness. for instance, i have several friends who scored lower than me on the SATs who i know for a fact are much smarter than i am.

      also, in my experience maths and sciences don't become very challenging until you get to about college undergraduate level material. and i don't think the SATs/ACTs really test for scholastic aptitude beyond 9th or 10th grade high school course material. a better indicator of whether a student excels at math/science would be the AP exams, which do cover things like calculus and college-level physics.

      it's quite easy to excel in high school algebra & geometry, but the learning curve really shoots up once you get to multi-variable calculus/linear algebra or discrete mathematics. so you really shouldn't push a student into a math/science field that they're not interested in just because they find the high school material very easy. because once you get to college level courses, it quickly becomes a completely different story. and at that point it's vital that the student be interested in what he/she is studying, otherwise they won't have the drive to push ahead and will quickly get burnt out.

      that said, the reason a student might not be interest in math/science in high school could be due to their high school math & science curricula not being challenging enough to hold their interest. if she isn't in AP classes then perhaps she should try to take some math/science courses at a local community college. that will help to expose her to what college-level maths & sciences are really like, which she might find more interesting. also, i think it's a bad idea to treat college as a trade school or vocational training. students should be free to take classes that pique their interest and follow academic pursuits that they enjoy. once you've found your niche and finish college, you can then decide where best to apply your acquired skills. otherwise you might as well go to a technical school.

    3. Re:Be a teacher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is no math section on the ACT. It is a computation section that they call math. On the GRE it is called quantitative. University mathematics programs end up with many students who think they are good at math until they hit algebra and analysis and wonder what the hell happened. They tend to go on to become math teachers.

        When I was in grad school the best predictor of success in mathematics PhD programs was verbal GRE score, but nobody advises students who score perfect on the English portion of the ACT to think about being a mathematician. I wonder why that is.

      She doesn't want to be an engineer or scientist. I thought the folks here would be a great group to ask

      You are better off asking her what she wants to do. What is she interested in? If she has no idea then going to a large university where she'll be exposed to a number of different fields and opportunities is not a bad idea.

    4. Re:Be a teacher by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      "When I was in grad school the best predictor of success in mathematics PhD programs was verbal GRE score, but nobody advises students who score perfect on the English portion of the ACT to think about being a mathematician. I wonder why that is."

      You are discounting a large group of people who score below 400's on the verbal GRE and able to finish the PhD. Those who holding a F-1 or J-1 student visas.

    5. Re:Be a teacher by Fluffy_Kitten · · Score: 1

      and there's certainly a correlation between good students and good SAT/ACT scores.

      I apologise in advance. What is the r value?

      --
      People who have no sig are cool
    6. Re:Be a teacher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know exactly how it's in the USA, but in my country (Austria, EU ;) ) high school math is like learning how to drive a car and university level math is like learning how to build a car.

      You should be able to drive a car when you build one, but beyond that don't expect it to be the same.

      I am currently in med school and I am thinking about quitting and doing math instead. (Med school is 6 years here and not like the pro school concept in the USA. So I don't have a BS degree yet)

      And I've seen quite a few people who were great at Highschool math but quit the university within a few weeks, months top. It were the kind of people who didn't know what to do with their life, at that point. They thought, well you can earn lots of money with math so go study it.

      My point: Don't push her into anything just because of her Highschool grades.

    7. Re:Be a teacher by amRadioHed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just because the immigrant students don't have perfect English skills doesn't mean they don't have excellent verbal skills. How they would do on a test in their native language would be more relevant.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    8. Re:Be a teacher by Stile+65 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that depends on how you define the "goodness" of students.

      --
      I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    9. Re:Be a teacher by Smauler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, marketing is put forward as a serious alterative to scientific pursuits, and is +4 informative. I never thought I'd see the day slashdot. News for Nerds, Stuff that matters.

    10. Re:Be a teacher by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      less knowledge, more memorization.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    11. Re:Be a teacher by Kachii · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I absolutely agree with this comment. I'm from the UK and I suffered the same fate that you wish to throw upon your daughter - being coerced into a specific degree program at a top London university just because I excelled in that area in my secondary (high) school, without realising myself what a change it would be from the material I had learnt thus far through my life. It certainly didn't do me any favours.

      I am trundling along. I appear to have the required intelligence in order to complete my degree (or so I hope!) but damn is that learning curve STEEP.

      Other than that, it strikes me odd that you can't come up with some viable and interesting options yourself. Basically, unless your daughter wants to be an elementary school maths teacher, she's probably going to be surrounded by it 24/7 for the rest of her life (researcher, anyone?). If she's not going to enjoy it, please, don't make her do it - and that includes cajoling her into believing it's the only thing she's possibly good at.

      Instead of asking what you have here, I suggest you ask your daughter what she'd /like/ to do - see all the other degrees and/or career paths your daughter could take, excel in and enjoy and still lead a successful life at the end of it. It'll be like a voyage of discovery for you! - finding out what professions are good for your daughter, instead of the professions you can push her into despite her distaste for them.

      Good luck.

      --
      I live only for the present moment, there is no other moment.
    12. Re:Be a teacher by foobsr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Instead of asking what you have here, I suggest you ask your daughter what she'd /like/ to do

      Excellent point — I myself was pressed into (natural) 'science' because math was easy to me, which in the long run (decades) turned out to be a major desaster that I am still trying to recover from.

      CC.

      --
      TaijiQuan (Huang, 5 loosenings)
    13. Re:Be a teacher by drix · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As someone who is starting a math grad program next year and got an 800 on the GRE verbal, I can't tell you how happy I am to hear you say that :-) Boasting aside, I have always felt that people miss out on the distinction between mathematics and computation. Performing mathematical operations sequentially to arrive at an answer, a la a computer, is what you do on the SAT (and I assume the ACT as well.) This is a very different feat from sitting down with a math book and trying to wrap your ahead around a theoretical concept. To me, writing a proof has always felt like far more of a right-brained activity
      than a left-brained one. When I'm thinking deeply about something mathematical, the feeling I get is akin to what I experience when playing music or drawing--completely different from performing addition and subtraction. I theorize that this is why a lot of math professors are crummy arithmeticians.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    14. Re:Be a teacher by leenks · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree - my sister was nearly pressured into an engineering route at college by schooling and sponsorship deals but stuck to her guns and has a postgraduate diploma in music performance on two instruments. She's very happy - she can do the music when the work is available for her instruments, and to fill in of the time can get "technical" positions in sales/marketing for engineering companies.

      I'm going to get flamed and/or marked as a troll here, but from my observations the American way doesn't cater well for that kind of thinking. Everything appears to be about excelling and celebration of success, even if that means the child has to do something they don't really like doing - as long as they are very good then the praise and peer respect makes up for it.

    15. Re:Be a teacher by martin_henry · · Score: 1

      We're all allowed to dream...

      --
      www.purevolume.com/martyd
    16. Re:Be a teacher by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Well, I wonder what the girl looks like? Pretty face? Nice rack? Slender figure?

      With that...she really doesn't need a career...just marry a rich successful guy. Easy street the rest of her life. Higher math skills would just be an added perk.

      Hell....wish I didn't have to work, and my main job was shopping. I need to find a sugar momma.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:Be a teacher by alex4u2nv · · Score: 1

      I know this other girl: She has more fun being a stripper. Also makes more ;)

    18. Re:Be a teacher by blueZ3 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not a weakness of the American system (i.e. it's not inherent in the system itself) it's a weakness in Americans.

      Why anyone would do something they don't want for the approval of others is beyond me. If you hate your job, where you spend so much of your waking time, life must be miserable. A good number of us reject the proposition that outside approval is the be-all end-all, though it doesn't seem to be the majority opinion.

      On the other hand, a lot of the carping you hear has more to do with people choosing to take jobs for the money and then deciding that the job sucks. Those folks should either stop complaining, or switch to a lower-paying job they enjoy more (hate less)

      Better to do something you enjoy and live life with just the necessities than to do something you hate and have more material possessions. Of course, there's a line there, too--maybe it's worth it to do something you hate if you are making a ton of money.

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    19. Re:Be a teacher by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      I competed in mathematics during high school (11th in US at age 15) I chose Aerospace Engineering. Through bad timing and other mistakes, I did a lot of different things that while at times interesting, weren't terribly fulfilling. Now I am a mathematician doing risk analysis for space launches. It's a mix between my two desires.

      I originally chose not to get a degree in mathematics because I was unaware of the possibilities after college. If I had it to do over, I would have got the degree in mathematics. But that is also because I enjoy mathematics.

      From my own experience, there's multiple possible career paths for most everyone. The key is setting yourself up to be flexible enough to enjoy any of those that become available. Also, do you want to be a specialist or a jack-of-all-trades? Plus what will be your desires 5/10/20 years from now. Few people really know. Which is why I recommend the flexibility.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    20. Re:Be a teacher by bluenirve · · Score: 1

      This. I'm currently a math major, but I can honestly say that I didn't like high school math (though I was pretty good). The stuff you do in college and highschool are totally different. It started to open up for me in Abstract (if you couldn't tell, I err on the side of non-applied math). So definitely, tell her to get a taste of more kinds of math, because you may really like it.

    21. Re:Be a teacher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hi! I'm a teacher! (math, computers, science, French, Japanese...heck, you name it! :-)

      I think she should pursue origami...yep, origami...be a professional origamist, like this guy:
      Prof. Robert Lang, who holds over 50 patents on lasers and optoelectronics, now pro origamist ;-)
      He suggests letting "dead people do all the work for you...", take a look:
      http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/robert_lang_folds_way_new_origami.html

      TED talks for anyone wondering if they should go into math/science/engineering/etc. and need inspiration!

    22. Re:Be a teacher by vesuvana · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interesting... In 1980 when I, a female, applied to an engineering program at CCNY, I was told by the Dean of Engineering that I couldn't possibly become an engineer because I had gotten an 800 (perfect score) on the English part of the SAT in high school. Now many years later, I am giving up writing, which even as a tech writer working with engineers has been a total bore to me, and I'm back in school enjoying the hard sciences once again. Two morals to this story: 1. She should do what interests her, no matter what her grades are in anything. 2. It is never to late to change direction, so don't worry about her. She'll figure it out on her own.

    23. Re:Be a teacher by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      > You are discounting a large group of people who score below 400's on the
      > verbal GRE and able to finish the PhD. Those who holding a F-1 or J-1 student visas

      A technicality. They probably score way the hell up their in their native languages.

      I know plenty of furrin people at work (engineering, ya know) who use a lot more $20 English words than most native English speakers. One German guy using English words I damned well know my brother-in-law would go all glassy-eyed over.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    24. Re:Be a teacher by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      grades/report cards ought to be an indicator of general academic aptitude as well as specific aptitude in each of the various subjects, but because it's not standardized across all schools they can't be used for providing quantitative comparisons between students from different schools. that's why standardized tests like the SATs and ACTs were created. but naturally these standardized tests aren't as thorough as a student's grade transcript.

    25. Re:Be a teacher by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      Wait, the summary says she does not like sciences, she is just good at them.

      I am familiar with groupthink around here, but the mods that are dropping my comment from +whatever to oblivion are living in a dream world.

      Snaring a technically gifted person that would otherwise shun the field altogether, and getting a technically apt mind involved in research support (ie:creating/molding public awareness through marketing) would be a high5 score for most research groups.

      I think maybe some people are unaware that marketing != sales. Marketing and sales are both highly evolved arts, but at the highest levels I have observed marketing = mystical kung-fu vs sales' MMA approach.

      Another way to think about it... a good sales person plays to the customer's pragmatic desires, a good marketing person finds ways to entice a customer's vision.

    26. Re:Be a teacher by russotto · · Score: 1

      I don't know exactly how it's in the USA, but in my country (Austria, EU ;) ) high school math is like learning how to drive a car and university level math is like learning how to build a car.

      Unfortunately, in the USA, high school math is like learning to drive a slot car (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slot_car) (arithmetic, algebra, maybe trig and geometry). In the university you get to drive a real car (e.g. calculus, statistics, linear algebra) and only the truly brave or foolish go on to the various courses (offered senior level and graduate level -- e.g. Advanced Algebra) where you learn to build a car.

    27. Re:Be a teacher by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you hate your job, where you spend so much of your waking time, life must be miserable. A good number of us reject the proposition that outside approval is the be-all end-all, though it doesn't seem to be the majority opinion.

      With respect to the job: It's typically not the outside approval, it's the pay. A lower-paying job which you enjoy more is often not feasible; either you're not qualified (or "overqualified") for the lower-paying jobs, or they're same badness, less pay, or the drop in pay you'd have to take to get the better job is far too great; you wouldn't be able to do the things you enjoy on the lower pay. It'd be nice if there was some continuous scale where you could say, "Oh, I'll take 75% of the pay for a job which sucks 25% less", but there isn't. In general, I think doing something you don't want for the approval of others is pretty much a standard human thing, not an American thing. In fact, as a society America is probably LESS like that than many others -- Japan, for example.

    28. Re:Be a teacher by Geek_Cop · · Score: 1

      I would suggest this, not that it would work for her: I have been many things in my 35 years, most of them successful, a few of them being very well paid, however I found myself hating most of the jobs where I was very well paid, i.e. IT and Corporate/Executive Management. I was very math-centric in college and I changed my major a few times, but I never stopped the concentrations in math and sciences. So after telling all this, I suggested the same thing to my kids, which, was not to change your major a bunch of times, but to pick a college major that is a bit more generalized, but make sure you focus on getting a good understanding of math and sciences, because if you do have those foundations laid...when you finally figure out what you want to do, you will have the ability to do so. Very few successful jobs exist without math or science specialties, but if you keep those as a foundation, your options are far more diverse. What am I now? Well, I am a cop. I make a lot less money, and I am an IT Consultant/Real Estate agent in my off time, but I am much happier than when I was working in software development, or within the confines of the greedy corporate ladder. Maybe next week I can be a Gynecologist.

    29. Re:Be a teacher by Tanmi-Daiow · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. I am in a similar position. I am a third year Math undergrad student and plan on attending grad school for Mathematics in the near future. My arithmetic skills are already suffering greatly at the hands of Modern Algebra and Real Analysis. Oh well, I enjoy both of those subjects more than arithmetic.

      --
      "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive." - C.S. Lewis
    30. Re:Be a teacher by metlin · · Score: 1

      Wow, marketing is put forward as a serious alterative to scientific pursuits, and is +4 informative. I never thought I'd see the day slashdot. News for Nerds, Stuff that matters.

      Then you know nothing about marketing.

      Marketing is not entirely branding (which is what most people think of, when they hear marketing). There is a very, very heavy quantitative component to marketing that most people are not aware of.

      I'm a strategy consultant, and I work a lot with marketing and promotions. A big chunk of marketing involves channel & distribution analysis, analytics to understand market segments, campaign management, pricing models etc. And that involves heavy, heavy statistics and a lot of data crunching to see what people use, what's the optimal pricing, how well discounts work out, how to run effective campaigns, how to measure the success/failure of any campaign (branding, price change, ad etc) and so on and so forth.

      And with the advent of the web, web analytics is another very important component, as well. Hell, there are even products out there that help you manage a lot of this (e.g. Unica - their website even talks about modeling a lot of what I talked about).

      I know people with PhDs in stats, math and physics who work in marketing. They do predictive analysis to see how the market will react to a new product, what customers are buying, how best to price an offering, what stores are doing well and what are not (and why), which channels are doing well and which ones are not (and why), forecasting inventory based on past performance and YTD etc.

      And there are enough journals and publications out there (such as the Quantitative Marketing & Economics by Springer-Verlag) which do serious academic (and mathematical, if I might add) research into these areas. They borrow very heavily from other subject areas, particularly physics, statistics, economics and so on.

      But hey, you're Mr. Strong. Marketing is for pansies.

    31. Re:Be a teacher by Xaria · · Score: 1

      I enjoyed physics more at High School, but demonstrated a much stronger aptitude for Chemistry. I also really enjoyed the humanities subjects, but didn't see a job at the end of them that interested me. My school score would have easily allowed me into medicine or law.

      I got 6 weeks into a physics degree before I realised that University-level physics is HARD ... for me. I dropped out and since I was also taking a programming subject ended up switching to IT. In hindsight I should have done something like pharmacy or medicine (or maybe even law, it fascinates me since learning more about it). So what you are really good at should be considered despite what you THINK you want to do. But nor should your niece be pushed into anything specific. Is she a people person? Analytical skills are valuable all over the place - maybe she would fit well into a legal or medical degree, where the ability to think critically about something applies.

    32. Re:Be a teacher by Wicked+Zen · · Score: 1

      I apologise in advance. What is the r value?

      'Rithmetic.

    33. Re:Be a teacher by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

      Those who holding a F-1 or J-1 student visas.

      And pray tell, what was your GRE verbal score?

      --
      Beetle B.
    34. Re:Be a teacher by fractoid · · Score: 1

      I hate tests like that. I lost out on the top-marks prize for my first year programming course by half a percent, to a guy who could hardly program - but by god could he study for exams. I think he went off to study Commerce or something.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    35. Re:Be a teacher by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      If she has no idea then going to a large university where she'll be exposed to a number of different fields and opportunities is not a bad idea.

      I've heard enough bad things about professors at big universities in intro-level courses to be wary of this idea (maybe you've experienced otherwise). I went to a large high school, but my college is about half the size and all of the professors are really into teaching- about every week while talking to my friend at a big uni I find another example of something that is better here thanks to it being a small school. I admit, though, that my school only offers engineering/math/science degrees, so it is not the place for someone that needs to find direction.

      That said, looking for extracurricular groups to try out would be the best choice. They almost always are looking for new members, and they really try to play to peoples' interests. I liked the kind of math where you have to come up with your own method to solve the problem, so I joined math team, and found I really liked that kind of work. Now I'm going to become a professional problem solver by getting a ME degree.

    36. Re:Be a teacher by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear. I was going to say something like that, leaving out the being female part of course. If you don't love what you do, then no amount of aptitude will be truly satisfying. That's why my SO went into software development after getting a science PhD.

    37. Re:Be a teacher by VernonNemitz · · Score: 1

      There are different ways to teach. Consider Isaac Asimov's method of writing lots and lots of nonfiction books. Even science fiction can be educational (and fun for the author, too).

    38. Re:Be a teacher by pacinpm · · Score: 1

      Teacher is a worst job imaginable. If she wants non-nerd, slightly technical job she should consider being architect. It's part science - part art. Should suite her perfectly.

    39. Re:Be a teacher by HerrMnky · · Score: 1

      Or, if she's interesting in teaching but hates all the red tape that goes with it, then she could look into educational measurement, statistics and research design. Using her aptitude and apathy for math, she could study how people learn, design studies, or write and evaluate tests, all of which benifits from a strong foundation of statistics, but are not primarily math subjects. Thus, she can benifit from an aptitude, while following something she finds more interesting.

    40. Re:Be a teacher by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, intercourse is kind of like a course, isn't it?

    41. Re:Be a teacher by jemtallon · · Score: 1
    42. Re:Be a teacher by coolguy2k · · Score: 1

      The world could use competent teachers. To be honest though, if she finds them easy she may not be able to teach her 'gift' very well.

      She's going to have to find something that she likes to do. There are plenty of things that I am naturally very good at that I don't care to do on a regular basis. Make her well rounded and she and everyone around her will benefit.

    43. Re:Be a teacher by reddrakos · · Score: 1

      I....I don't understand, math and science are their own rewards!

    44. Re:Be a teacher by BASH+guy · · Score: 1

      Everyone thinks all kids should go to college and they will be set for life. Not necessiarily so. Who will be the electricians and beautitions. Also you need to watch for the advisors who get you into a dead end curriculum where the jobs dry up before you graduate like designing buggy whips. As for teachers I had prof that said everyone should get a teachers certificate incase there were not other jobs available. This makes for generally unhappy people and sorry teachers.

    45. Re:Be a teacher by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      Y'know I agree with Chris Rock very rarely, but he said one thing about parenthood.
      Especially about being a father who has a daughter.
      Your main job in life is to keep her OFF THAT POLE!

    46. Re:Be a teacher by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      I know people with PhDs in stats, math and physics who work in marketing.

      In that case "Marketing" would not seem to be a logical career choice for somebody who doesn't like Maths or Sciences.

      Yes, even in Warehouse work (shipping, receiving, etc) there is a great deal of Mathematics and Science involved. There are PhD's who have derived equations to help the field during World War Two and beyond. The same with the insurance industry. Marketing can be very, very advanced; as can almost any other field. The point is that this person is not interested in Maths and Sciences.

    47. Re:Be a teacher by mokumegane · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember being completely bored in middle school and high school math. I always got an A or .05% away from one... but I never turned in one homework assignment. If the stuff was fun to do, I would do it in class, then throw it away in the garbage can. They should have advanced me but they didn't. Since they didn't do their work, I figured I didn't need to do mine... In college, I loved it, and learned a lot. High school... yeah, learned nothing. They kept me back in English, too, because I was the only one who came from the school I came from. Others who took Spanish or French instead of English scored worse in their English tests. Luckily, I had an English teacher who felt sorry for me and gave me different assignments than the normal curriculum.

    48. Re:Be a teacher by mokumegane · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, in the USA, high school math is like learning to drive a slot car (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slot_car) (arithmetic, algebra, maybe trig and geometry). (snip)

      More like learning to drive a slot car after having learned how to in grade school... Even if you do get into algebra, geometry or trig, they still find a way to make it all just like what you did in grade school... Actually, though, I was in algebra in middle school. It was still too easy... Halfway through high school, the government offered to me to take a test. If I did well, I'd almost never have to set foot in a high school again. If I didn't, then I would... and if I did well on half, then half my time would be at the high school. You bet I made the most out of those two years of free college! Oh, excuse me... it was the cost of books plus seventy-five cents a quarter for a building fee. By the way, if you know what you're doing, you can buy a nice looking used book (aka, no tears or worn places- as well as pen markings) clean it up and sell it for more than you paid for it at the end of the quarter... Yeah, you learn even how to make a little extra money in college...

    49. Re:Be a teacher by vesuvana · · Score: 1

      Doesn't it seem that aptitude is aptitude, above a certain very rudimentary level? If one has a heart for something, and is even an average student, one can succeed at it. this pigeon-holing of science vs art vs math vs language is all so artificial and unhelpful. And it's funny, because at the every most elite levels, these distinctions are totally meaningless.

    50. Re:Be a teacher by Weasel+Boy · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that people of ordinary skills can choose to apply themselves and succeed in most endeavors. And if they enjoy doing it, they will probably be fulfilled. My point was simply that being good at something doesn't mean you will be happy doing it. As your post illustrates.

      I wouldn't agree with your statement about aptitude, though. I hope you would agree that possessing adequacy is quite different from virtuosity. You can achieve mastery either way, but the former is more work.

  2. funs things to do with the degree by LingNoi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well you could ball it up and try and shoot it into a waste basket from a distance.

    Make it into a paper aeroplane.

    Burn it

    Origami perhaps..

    Yeah, that's all the fun things I can think of doing with a degree...

    1. Re:funs things to do with the degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell her to go into law or politics. It would be nice if a few more people in those areas had that sort of analytical ability.

    2. Re:funs things to do with the degree by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1
      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:funs things to do with the degree by martyros · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's a link my brother sent me awhile back with a guy with an interesting theory about why there are more men than women in advanced sciences:

      Because a PhD in science is a really poor career choice, and women are usually smart enough to avoid it, while men are much more likely to be sucked into it.

      The fact is that if you have the brains and discipline to get a PhD in science and become a prof at MIT or Harvard, you could probably make a *ton* more money, and quicker, and have much more job security, going into medicine, law, or business. Or you could be slave-labour grad student for 7 years, then serfdom post-doc for 6 years, slave as an untenured professor for 6 years and then be fired... er sorry, "denied tenure" and be looking for a brand new job or an entirely new career at the age of 35.

      But back to the question: one really good career path is to study engineering for undergrad because of the analytics and problem-solving skills it gives you, and then go into business or law. A lot of engineers make awesome businessmen because of the way they've been trained to think by their engineering education.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    4. Re:funs things to do with the degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or, she should become a normal teacher and sometimes help out her brother on intergalactical astrophysics problems he can't solve while fighting the Goa'uld...

    5. Re:funs things to do with the degree by RobinH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know where you've been working, but I think middle management is full of engineers who were attracted into management by the "career promotion" but ended up sucking because management is all about the "softer" people skills, not analytical ability. Not that analytical ability doesn't hurt, but you need to be interactive, outgoing, etc..

      Basically you could drop out of university half way through without taking any particular program, and still be successful in business if you just find the right combination of resources, need, and luck and put it all together at the right time.

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    6. Re:funs things to do with the degree by martyros · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, management, entrepreneurship, business development, business strategy... all of these are completely different activities requiring different skill sets. What I was talking about wasn't engineers going into management, so much as engineers using their analytical thinking to optimize business practices, finding the best place / the best way to make money in a particular competitive landscape, making strategic alliances for growth, &c.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    7. Re:funs things to do with the degree by linzeal · · Score: 1

      A PhD in science, engineering or the like should only be attempted by those who can bank on their brilliance when they finish, you can't bank on a degree when you finish. There is usually no comparison to someone who has done post-grad work to someone who has worked in the industry, the postgrad is going to be better informed. The industry does not give you the same opportunities to meet and greet your peers except at the odd convention or trade show. People who have spent their life in in the industry filled with undergrad degrees or masters are far more likely to be in an organization that does not keep their egos in check, allows them to make insipid even reckless design decisions and retreads the same thing over and over. At least half of the candidates I hang around are so inured to their own mediocrity that they deserve to become professors in YAMU (yet another mediocre university) or go work in some industry as described. The other half could easily start their own engineering or consulting firm or already have. Now if you are going for a science degree with an eye on teaching it, understand your limitations and expect only 50-60k a year when you get done than well good luck and god bless.

    8. Re:funs things to do with the degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or, she should become a normal teacher and sometimes help out her brother on intergalactical astrophysics problems he can't solve while fighting the Goa'uld...

      I think you mean the Wraith, not Goa'uld. The status of your geek card is currently under review, although your correct spelling of Goa'uld will be taken into account.

    9. Re:funs things to do with the degree by k2enemy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's a link my brother sent me awhile back with a guy with an interesting theory about why there are more men than women in advanced sciences.

      http://philip.greenspun.com/careers/women-in-science

    10. Re:funs things to do with the degree by azaris · · Score: 1

      The fact is that if you have the brains and discipline to get a PhD in science and become a prof at MIT or Harvard, you could probably make a *ton* more money, and quicker, and have much more job security, going into medicine, law, or business. Or you could be slave-labour grad student for 7 years, then serfdom post-doc for 6 years, slave as an untenured professor for 6 years and then be fired... er sorry, "denied tenure" and be looking for a brand new job or an entirely new career at the age of 35.

      That's a harsh way to treat someone who finished their bachelor's at 16!

      Seriously, academia tends to attract people who aren't into medicine, law, or business for the sake of making a lot of money (not to mention being unsuitable for those fields because of differing personalities and social skills). I could make more money not playing a grad student, but it's a decision I made because I got bored of the pressure and tedium of working with people who didn't really know what they were doing (usually called business). Don't assume everyone is driven by lust for money or a luxurious career.

    11. Re:funs things to do with the degree by Draek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The fact is that if you have the brains and discipline to get a PhD in science and become a prof at MIT or Harvard, you could probably make a *ton* more money, and quicker, and have much more job security, going into medicine, law, or business.

      Yeah. Too bad that for anyone thinking about getting a PhD in science or mathematics, getting a degree in medicine or working as a lawyer is about as interesting as watching paint dry. Perhaps even less so, since at least with paint you actually have time to do something interesting.

      A very good friend of mine, who worked as a very well-paid IT consultant for a huge multinational, once told me something I found interesting, that my experience has shown to be true: "there's always good jobs for those who excel, so go with what you like, not what will make you the most money".

      Or you could be slave-labour grad student for 7 years, then serfdom post-doc for 6 years, slave as an untenured professor for 6 years and then be fired... er sorry, "denied tenure" and be looking for a brand new job or an entirely new career at the age of 35.

      Which is still better than making "teh big bux" for three years doing something you don't like, then making shitty money in a job you hate for the rest of your life after the entire field changes focus and you're left behind, your skills outdated by your lack of interest in the area. Sorry to burst your bubble, dude, but I've yet to meet someone who excels at their job and doesn't love it, be it in programming, sysadmin, mathematics, even music and photography. All this "follow the money" philosophy seems to create is mediocrity.

      But then again, that plus your brother's quote explain the long-standing question of why are there so little, truly successful women out there ;)

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    12. Re:funs things to do with the degree by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Don't do an airplane! That's what an engineer would do. Instead, build a model of a negatively curved surface, then draw some triangles on it...

    13. Re:funs things to do with the degree by antirelic · · Score: 1

      If she is that smart, I think she will figure out what she wants to do on her own without you getting in the way.

      sheesh!

      --
      20th century Marxism is not progress...
  3. Simple by heretic108 · · Score: 5, Funny

    With her mathematical/scientific aptitude and overall intellectual capability, there's one very simple and satisfying career choice!

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
    1. Re:Simple by troll8901 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or be a comic producer!

      Obligatory links:

    2. Re:Simple by who+knows+my+name · · Score: 1

      If only one day my thesis becomes a collectors item...

      --
      Nothing to see here.
    3. Re:Simple by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      There's always this or this.

    4. Re:Simple by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All kidding aside, being proficient in math and science often means that you have a leg up on almost any profession. Certainly there are some fields where it won't help, but the ability to reason and figure out what the numbers are really saying can help anyone from lawyers to doctors to politicians. For the latter, it's sometimes depressing how few understand math and science.

      Now I don't know the reasons why the niece doesn't want to pursue a science/math career, but it's likely because the traditionally male dominated careers are from very early on discouraged to females. It's not an overt pressure, just the insinuations from teachers and peers. Girls get oven sets. Boys get chemistry sets.

    5. Re:Simple by x-guru · · Score: 1

      He's not the only Math-wiz to choose that career. Here is another one.

      You might also consider the environmental sciences. This will combine a love of the outdoors with an aptitude for mathematics and science. Here is how I applied my Computer Science degree.

      --x

    6. Re:Simple by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      This just means that she gets to work on her creativity as well! Better living through household chemicals with additional help from the oven!

  4. For starters... by Travoltus · · Score: 2, Informative

    You could calculate how much it costs to fly to China or India, which is where you'll be going if you want a job outside of teaching.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  5. Hollywood? by bytethese · · Score: 1

    I hear there's casting for a new series called Φbonacci...

  6. Econ by Rhys · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Graduate level economics is almost indistinguishable from graduate level math (or physics), but avoids some of that "hard sciences" feel.

    --
    Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
    1. Re:Econ by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      You might have some problem finding jobs given the current situation in the finance industry.

    2. Re:Econ by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. After all, have you ever seen an economist who didn't have a lot of money?

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:Econ by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most economist get their money by teaching and writing books, or put up a lot of speaking engagements. In that case you will need to go all the way to a PhD in Economics. A master's degree is not enough.

    4. Re:Econ by guacamole · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Graduate level economics is almost indistinguishable from graduate level math (or physics)

      This is not true (and fortunately, thank god, functional analysis while applicable in theory, has little to say about relevant real world economics). People who say econ is no different from math, obviously haven't taken a serious pure math course. Graduate economics is somewhat technical and quantitative but is not rigorous or formal enough to be confused with a branch of mathematics (unless you take an advanced theory course, which is not representative of the field as a whole). At the same time, there is not enough dynamical systems in it to be confused with physics (I took a bunch of econ courses, and didn't have to solve one differential equation). But yes, econ a very quantitative, and so math,stat, or physics majors could feel at very comfortable in an econ program.

    5. Re:Econ by guacamole · · Score: 1

      Most economists DO NOT get to teach because the number of PhDs produced exceeds the available academic positions. However, the non-academic market for them is indeed very rich and often lucrative. Besides the private finance industry, they get employment in central banks (the FED, etc), think tanks, consulting companies (marketing research, transfer pricing research, etc), international organizations (IMF, World Bank, etc), insurance companies, elsewhere in government (Treasury, FTC, etc.) Even the finance industry slump is a one off kind of thing. I wouldn't worry about it if I was entering the graduate program just now.

    6. Re:Econ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      She Is NOT CHALLENGED! people that say they don't care for something but have the aptitude to do it, may not feel
      challenged, or don't relate it to what interests them.

      personal opinion, Econ though a good field, is a waste with talent like that.

      However, don't push her into science she will only run away faster, I didn't like science until I found a field that was fun for me, that was/IS Astronomy, the time, 5th grade I went to the local science museum, the reason I switched from what I wanted to do before this, was that it became relevant to what I already loved.

      man, its her choice.

    7. Re:Econ by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (I took a bunch of econ courses, and didn't have to solve one differential equation)

      It is very easy to get an undergraduate degree in econ without knowing anything more than algebra and some statistics... BUT that doesn't mean differential equations aren't involved, it just means your profs didn't go the extra step and show you the calculus happening behind all those wonderful graphs. And honestly, it means you didn't get your money's worth.

      If you took graduate level econ courses without touching differential equations... I really don't know what to say. For any degree in economics, one would be very well served taking as much pure math as they can handle.

      That said, a minor or (double) major with statistics can take you into almost any field you like, since everyone needs people to crunch and interpret numbers.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    8. Re:Econ by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Case in point - I knew a guy pursing a PhD in the physical sciences who decided to take some courses on the side from the university's prestigious business school (tuition was waived but he couldn't get an actual degree). In his first week of class the professor said that in their program they would be doing serious math and that calculus would be used regularly. It turns out that this meant calculating derivatives of polynomials - which apparently had half the business majors turning white. Suffice it to say my friend was amused.

      I'm sure there are individuals with exceptional math skills in the business-oriented professions, but in my experience what rates as "complicated math" in those fields amounts to anything more than the first 8 weeks of a primary school Algebra I course.

    9. Re:Econ by try_anything · · Score: 1

      She may know more about her aptitude for math than her uncle does. Her uncle clearly has a lot at stake in this decision and may be applying some wishful thinking with regard to his niece's abilities. I wouldn't be surprised if she already told him she wasn't very good at math, but he dismissed it as false modesty or a product of sexism.

      My sister and I were both good at specific types of thinking and knew what our strengths and weaknesses were, but we were both valedictorians who aced all our classes and aced both parts of the SAT, so the adults around us tended to think we were both brilliant at everything.

      My sister got a near-perfect score on her math SATs, but she knew from her calculus class that she had no aptitude for math. She couldn't solve the problems the "right way," but was bright and diligent enough to memorize all the homework problems and solve problems on her calculus tests by pattern matching -- remembering the homework problem that most resembled the test problem, recreating the solution from memory, and making whatever logical adjustments were required. She understood math when it was explained to her and could make corrections in the solutions, but she couldn't come up with original solutions by herself when given a problem she hadn't seen before. She made her way through high school and college calculus by brute intellectual force -- getting solid As in both, at the cost of lots of crying and shrieking and hurling of books -- and now she has a PhD in history.

      I made it through high school literature the same way (minus the crying and shrieking.) If I was primed to see something in a literary work, I could usually see it. Given a literary work with no guidance, it was long gruelling work for me to find any patterns except the ones that resembled ones I had studied in class. I couldn't spot patterns that were generalizations of ones I had already studied. It was a huge frustration to me, and very humbling, that I worked so hard at literature and had so little insight to show for it.

      Like my sister and this guy's niece did in math, I aced my English classes and aced the verbal SATs. I even got a 5 on the AP American Literature test. My parents thought I was an intellectually well-rounded kid, but I knew better.

    10. Re:Econ by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      It is very easy to get an undergraduate degree in econ without knowing anything more than algebra and some statistics.

      I don't think this is true.

      Even your plain old intermediate macroeconomics course is going to require you to compute derivatives. But I don't remember needing anything beyond first semester calc for my undergrad in econ.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    11. Re:Econ by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Economics and Finance are totally different disciplines.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    12. Re:Econ by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Most economist get their money by teaching and writing books, or put up a lot of speaking engagements.

      ??

      Most Economics students that I know from actually studying Economics got their money by going into business. We didn't study the economy to write crappy editorials in the NY Times, you know.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    13. Re:Econ by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      That was not an Econ problem--that was a finance problem.

      And furthermore, that's not where the term "dismal science" comes from.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  7. So many things... by WindowlessView · · Score: 1

    I thought the folks here would be a great group to ask: What are some creative, not too nerdy professions that nonetheless require a talent for math, engineering, or science?

    Wall Street? We are talking 4 years from now so there is time for it to recover.

    A math and science background is good even if she doesn't directly use it. An MBA on top of an engineering degree can take her far in this world.

    --
    Leave the gun, take the cannolis.
    1. Re:So many things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Nobody's said "Architect" yet...

      but it's certainly one of the most creative things I can think of which requires an aptitude in math (geometry) and science (er, engineering).

  8. quantative finance by jay2003 · · Score: 1

    While not everyone's idea of fun, math skills can be put to good use in quantitative finance and it can be extremely lucrative. The sector has melted down for the moment but it will recover.

    1. Re:quantative finance by kbrasee · · Score: 1, Funny

      While not anyone's idea of fun

      Fixed that for you.

  9. How about medicine? by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most prerequisites for medicine (or dentistry, veterinary medicine, or chiropractic school) are science classes. If she does well as math and science, she may way to consider those paths.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:How about medicine? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 2, Funny

      Medicine is great if you are prepared for the huge amount of student loan debt that comes with it.

    2. Re:How about medicine? by kbrasee · · Score: 1

      I scored a 35 on the ACT and qualified for a full ride scholarship at every university I was considering (including Case Western, not a cheap place by any means). But that was for Comp Sci, don't know if the same scholarship criteria are used for medicine.

    3. Re:How about medicine? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      Med school doesn't start until you get your bachelor's degree.

      Basically what happen is, you study whatever you want in the first 4 years (or whatever time it takes to get your bachelor's), and then you apply for medical school. So in your case, i will do my computer science courses, plus a bunch of biology/chem/anatomy+physiology courses on the side. Then take the MCAT exam in your 3rd or 4th year. Apply a year early of course.

      The following is a great, well written document on how to get started. It was mention here on Slashdot before, but I couldn't find the article.

      http://share.studentdoctor.net/downloads/medshort.pdf

    4. Re:How about medicine? by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Informative

      Medicine is great if you are prepared for the huge amount of student loan debt that comes with it.

      There are a variety of ways to deal with that.

      • There are several programs that will essentially relieve your debt if you do a few years rural practice
      • Some schools have BS/MD programs for students who would otherwise be "traditional" pre-med in undergrad - finish the two degrees in less than the usual 8 years (and hence take in less debt)
      • Research physician (MD/PhD) programs are usually paid in full by the school
      • If you go into a high-paying specialty you will pull in enough money that your debt will be irrelevant
      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    5. Re:How about medicine? by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      High paying specialty may have high risk of not getting jobs at all. Or may be in just a few cases.

      As a side note, I know someone who rack up 6 figure student loan to finish a PhD in Electrical Engineering and still haven't able to find job in the past 18 months (in the Chicago metro area). There are cases where schools don't have funding for research students.

      And yeah you forget about military physician, which you can of course come out with no debt too.

    6. Re:How about medicine? by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Also, Case Western is (according to Wikipedia) ranked in the 40s by US News and report. Now, I'm not saying if that means anything, if the education there is any less or more valuable in terms of quality, etc etc etc, but the competitiveness factor is not at all the same as a top 10/top 20, which would be a big factor in cost and scholarship.

    7. Re:How about medicine? by DebateG · · Score: 1

      You actually don't have to do rural practice for loan forgiveness. You just have to work in an undeserved community, which can include rural areas, Indian reservations, or the inner city. Most decently sized cities have clinics that serve such a community. If you live frugally and have a competitive application, you could theoretically live in NYC for a few years and leave with no debt.

    8. Re:How about medicine? by bwalling · · Score: 2, Funny

      Medicine is great if you are prepared for the huge amount of student loan debt that comes with it.

      Well, the salary you'll get is more than enough to cover the debt. But, along the way, you'll get brainwashed about how "doctors don't make what they used to" by people who will then get in their Mercedes and drive home, never realizing that they make 6x the median income and many people can't even afford their services.

    9. Re:How about medicine? by stormguard2099 · · Score: 1

      There are a variety of ways to deal with that.

      Some schools have BS/MD programs for students who would otherwise be "traditional" pre-med in undergrad - finish the two degrees in less than the usual 8 years (and hence take in less debt)

      I'm not sure I would recommend a BD/SM program for my daughter but I suppose it take's all kinds.

      Wait, I think i read that wrong....

      --
      http://greenobyl.com/ please.... think of the children!!
    10. Re:How about medicine? by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      There are several programs that will essentially relieve your debt if you do a few years rural practice

      Having been an avid Northern Exposure fan, I was quite surprised to find out that this is actually true. I used to date a nurse who got her Masters in Midwifery this way: by agreeing to work in underprivileged neighborhoods for a certain amount of time, the state picked up the bill for the education.

      Pretty cool idea.

    11. Re:How about medicine? by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      >undeserved

      I *hope* you mean under-served.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  10. Gogogogo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Plenty of people go to MIT and don't end up in "nerdy professions"...actually that's probably true for the majority of people. If she can make it into someplace like MIT, she should go regardless of her exact interests...they will change, and there are certainly more than enough opportunities to keep her occupied. Just look at the Media Lab site http://www.media.mit.edu/ for example.

    -MIT '93

  11. Don't get too excited. by jfjfjdk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At my mid-level university, one quarter of all students who made it past the second year in my rigorous program had perfect scores on both sections. The test really isn't that difficult these days, and even a moderate amount of targeted prep combined with a targeted curriculum puts you in a strong position; put her in a Putnam and we'll see what she's made of. MIT is the sort of unpleasant experience that should be reserved for those who genuinely want it.

    1. Re:Don't get too excited. by Hao+Wu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      MIT is the sort of unpleasant experience that should be reserved for those who genuinely want it.

      Absolutely, and so many people lose perspective on that. My philosophy is to aim for the top, minus one or two "points". In other words people who push themselves to the max seem to end up miserable.

      Don't sell yourself short, by any means... Aim high high HIGH -- but be realistic.

      Whatever that means!

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    2. Re:Don't get too excited. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd like to say, Aim High, but choose your target wisely. Many people, culture, common sense will all try and tell you what that highest goal should be. For God's sake, choose the goal your self.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    3. Re:Don't get too excited. by Zackbass · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For what it's worth my philosophy isn't to push yourself to the max, but just generally upward and see where it takes you. It landed me at MIT building robots and I'm about as far from miserable as I can get. Taking your chances and shooting high doesn't mean pushing yourself to the max all the time, just sometimes. And if you didn't do it sometimes how could you ever know what you're capable of?

      --
      You gotta find first gear in your giant robot car
    4. Re:Don't get too excited. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Informative

      Forgot to add the homework assignment. Do your freakin' research before your choose your goal. You'd think that would be obvious, but it apparently isn't.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    5. Re:Don't get too excited. by porcupine8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      MIT is the sort of unpleasant experience that should be reserved for those who genuinely want it.

      This, this, this. Though most of the time if she doesn't really want to go there, they'll catch it in the admissions process - but occasionally someone slips through b/c they did a good job of faking it for their parents' sake. I saw one of those people have an honest-to-god breakdown in her advisor's office.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    6. Re:Don't get too excited. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, no, no. I went to MIT, and had a blast. So did my roommate who majored in Music: the alternative and classical music expertise among a group of such intense people gets weird, but can be an amazing wealth of knowledge, and with Harvard and BU and the other Boston colleges, the music scene is a blast for students.

      All the Ivy League schools have great opportunities to meet wonderful, brilliant people and learn from them, or teach them. Writing, art, history, nd even archaeogy can use good math skills. The question shouldn't be 'how do we get her to study science', but 'what does she want to do'.

    7. Re:Don't get too excited. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      MIT is the sort of unpleasant experience that should be reserved for those who genuinely want it.

      I did the MIT undergrad thing followed by basic science career path (PhD, post-doc - computational biology). I haven't yet made it to the tenured faculty position so maybe my views will eventually change - but I've been shocked by how hard it is to make a living off a career in basic science.

      From what I've seen, trying to make a basic science career work is like trying to make an acting career work. There's the superstars that everyone hears about who are doing extremely well for themselves and there are those who move sideways into management who make pretty good money - but those who try to make a go of it doing the pure stuff (pure science / pure acting): well, that's not a recipe for financial success.

      That's not to say that choosing a career in basic science is the wrong choice (either for me or in general), just that you shouldn't do it unless basic science is something that you are deeply committed to.

      For myself, I found that I got pretty far along my career path doing what other people wanted me to be doing (rather than what I wanted to be doing myself) and I ended up in a place where, in the words of Arthur Dent, "I seemed to be having a problem with my lifestyle."

      After some pretty tough times, I eventually started making my choices based on what I wanted and things have improved for me considerably (although the career side of things is still tough).

      I guess what I'm saying is that if your niece were to end up in a basic science career because it was what you wanted for her (rather than what she wanted for herself) then she would probably be deeply unhappy for a whole variety of reasons.

    8. Re:Don't get too excited. by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      You went to MIT and didn't know a single person who had serious psychological issues that were either triggered or exacerbated by being at MIT? Really? I call bullshit.

      I loved MIT, I still love MIT, but the motto is IHTFP for a reason. Even people who love it, also hate it. People who don't love it? Or love it but can't handle it for some reason? Wind up at MacLean.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    9. Re:Don't get too excited. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I agree. Many years ago I was sort of in your niece's position (I am also female) and went to MIT just because I wanted to be around people who wouldn't freak out at my math record. I majored in neither science nor engineering but got to do all those things for fun whenever I wanted.

      There are many non natural science and engineering majors such as political science, linguistics, architecture, anthropology, etc., where MIT does a great job of adding a technical approach that I find lacking in programs at liberal arts schools. Call me biased but I know a lot of current PhD candidates in these fields who came to MIT from other schools and they don't know such basic things as probability density functions. It's appalling but it really makes me appreciate the rigor that MIT puts its undergraduates through.

    10. Re:Don't get too excited. by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      Shh, don't tell! Do you really want all those money obsessed me-too types flooding the place?

      IT'S ALL TRUE, if you go to MIT they'll make you INTEGRATE FUNCTIONS in your HEAD, and you'll become NERDY and you will NEVER PLAY GOLF and NEVER GET LAID, and you'll end up designing rocket cars ALONE IN YOUR BASEMENT ON SATURDAY NIGHTS. DON'T GO THERE, YOU CAN STILL ESCAPE!

  12. It won't always be as easy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mastering the advanced concepts in Math and science is a lot more involved then High School. So if there is no interest, brilliance now could translate into mediocrity.

    1. Re:It won't always be as easy. by mysidia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand.. the lack of interest could also be a partial result of the High School level math being dull and uninteresting.

      A student may be lead to believe that all math is just as dull, simple, and tedious, as their immediate experience. And thus prejudice their view of the field as a whole...

    2. Re:It won't always be as easy. by Starayo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Math in high school is extremely tedious, at least here in NSW, Australia. The textbooks are all "solve so-and-so", "find x", etc. Give me something to stimulate my imagination! Instead of x, make me find space hampsters!

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:It won't always be as easy. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      As I see it, they're catering to students who have a great difficulty grasping the subject. And a case of quantity over quality.

      Which is extremely obnoxious and irritating for the people who get it quickly and wind up getting ridiculous repetitions of the same problem with only minor (insignificant) variations to answer over and over and over and over and over and over again......

    4. Re:It won't always be as easy. by Helios1182 · · Score: 1

      This is very important. I breezed right through math in high school. AP calc was easy. I got A's in linear algebra, advanced calc, discrete math, number theory, etc. in undergrad, but it was a lot more work.

      Eventually the topics become sufficiently non-intuitive that it takes a lot of effort to understand them. I look at what some friends are studying in topology and such and it looks interesting, but it is just not my thing. Unless you are really interested in the topic no amount of natural talent will translate into success.

    5. Re:It won't always be as easy. by thrawn_aj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mastering the advanced concepts in Math and science is a lot more involved then High School. So if there is no interest, brilliance now could translate into mediocrity.

      THIS.

      It's about your reference frame. High school math and science are piss-poor indicators of both difficulty and coolness. The tragedy is never that an originally interested student loses interest or gets bored due to college math/science. It is that the stuff gets exponentially more interesting (as you start doing REAL math that can serve as a REAL tool to understand the universe around you) while at the same time getting progressively more involved.

      I won't say that it gets more difficult (it does get involved - as in lots of diverse concepts to integrate) on an absolute scale because it doesn't. Math is one of the VERY few fields that get easier with time IF (and only if :P) you build a strong foundation to begin with. Contrary to most fields, math truly requires you to have mastered everything and remember almost everything (rather - integrate it into your thinking until it becomes second nature) from semester to semester. My fellow students who refused to believe this are precisely the ones who faltered later.

      That's one of the hard parts about taking math/science classes though. People are used to the idea (from the humanities perhaps) that information content in classes is sparse (low signal to noise) so that remembering the key points is sufficient. Quite so. TO put it simply, the humanities are noted for their verbosity (not a bad thing - in fact, sometimes it's the only redeeming feature in some otherwise redundant fields :P) while the sciences are noted for being too laconic. Perhaps we should sprinkle some 'noise' into the curriculum (Mythbusters anyone?). Unfortunately, some students tend to tune to the 'noise' in that case and miss the signal entirely :P.

      But the history of math and science has been the history of consolidation (both of concepts and notation) until the information is packed VERY densely into the core curriculum. The problem with very high signal to noise in the transmitter is that you need a nearly lossless receiver or you lose a LOT of information. That is precisely what happens in math and science classes.

      Remember: if a picture is worth a thousand words, an equation is worth at least a trillion :P.

      But, I'm rambling. My point (to echo the parent) is simply that the high school curriculum is a ridiculous indicator of what to expect in college/grad school. Talk to some students/profs at a good university. Look at some course sites (MIT's open course ware is a god example).

      The bottom line is that the "nerdiness" of a profession is a meaningless concept. People are nerdy, not professions. If you can't establish your own personality in what you do, you are merely a slave to social trends (or worse, a geek who gets his credo by following WIRED advice :P).

  13. Sports statistician? by eck011219 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Baseball statistician popped into my mind immediately, if she likes sports.

    There's also a lot of number crunching in politics, too, and there's the potential of doing quite a bit of good for society. Or evil. You know, whatever she's into.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  14. So... by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You could explain to her that neither math nor science in general is a `nerdy' profession, that she will outgrow her adolescence and that she will very soon hardly remember the names of her high school classmates. That there are peers out there to be had that are considerably more valuable than those who might have instilled in her that fear of nerdiness. That, in fact, she should do whatever it is she may want to do.

    1. Re:So... by mkcmkc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Pretty good advice. Although I'd had a strong interest in computers from at least the age of 10 (and math since 5), reading those career counseling guides with pictures of nerdy-looking programmers in horn-rimmed glasses made me fear what my life would be like if I followed that path. So, instead, I wandered around in the wilderness for a few years, trying this and that and discovering what I wasn't good at. Finally, I returned to computers and it was quite a revelation.

      I've no idea what'd be good in your case. Maybe just encourage her to keep an open mind and explore the possibilities.

      --
      "Not an actor, but he plays one on TV."
    2. Re:So... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1
      I think your right there. I did a degree in physics and there were a lot of pretty popular people in my class. Just because you take a "nerdy" degree doesn't mean you are a nerd :)

      That said, just because you are good at something doesn't mean you want to do it for a career. Maybe she would be better off taking something she has an interest in, as a backup maybe take a minor in computer science or something. For example, still use math but not quite as abstract, accounting, or actuarial science. Or even just business.

      The world needs more people that get business and technology. Often you find one or the other. Brilliant programmer makes company and then just wings it on the business part. She could bring both if that was her interest.

    3. Re:So... by Caboosian · · Score: 1

      Uh. You may not want to tell her that she won't remember the names of her classmates. True as that may be, the prospect of losing all your friends - especially to a teenage girl - is probably not the greatest motivator in the world.

    4. Re:So... by bwalling · · Score: 2, Funny

      she will very soon hardly remember the names of her high school classmates.

      Get a Facebook account. You won't be able to remember who they are, but you will have a list of the names and what they're doing every five minutes.

    5. Re:So... by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      The ones she will miss are, most probably, not those who think math is nerdy.

    6. Re:So... by joe_frisch · · Score: 1

      She may not know if she likes science if she hasn't tried. There are lots of places to do summer internships (most of the US national labs have these programs). Doing science in the real world is nothing like science in movies, or the science taught in school. She might like it or hate it, but it is worth a summer to find out. I work at a national lab, and have had summer interns who discovered they loved doing science. I've also had interns who decided they hated it when they found out that no matter how smart you are experiments don't always give you the results you expected. Scientists aren't all nerds either. Some do spend their time reading slashdot, but I know one person who competes in international level in-line speed-skating, and another who goes ice-climbing in the mountains.

    7. Re:So... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      Math is nerdy. Pure math is by far one of the nerdiest fields available.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
    8. Re:So... by Caboosian · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about that. My friends are not all like minded people - I love computers, yet my closest friends don't know the first thing about them. Does that mean I wouldn't be upset to lose those friends, simply because they're not interested in the same things as me? Of course not, and the same would likely apply to most people.

    9. Re:So... by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      Your closest friends may not know the first thing about computers, but they surely they do not think less of you because you do?

  15. Become an artist by Artista42 · · Score: 1

    Not the traditional sort... http://www.ekac.org/transgenicindex.html

  16. Science isn't always that nerdy... by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Insightful

    not too nerdy professions that nonetheless require a talent for math, engineering, or science

    There are some areas of scientific research that really aren't all that terribly nerdy. What are her hobbies? If there is something that she does for fun, she may be able to find a scientist that works on making it better...

    Not all components of scientific research happen in traditional lab environments.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  17. Ask her what she likes to do. by mswope · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You mentioned what she's good at. Try to find out what she likes and see if there's a match there. Sure, she's got the potential, but if she's not happy doing it - even if she follows it through, she's doing it for the wrong reasons. She'll probably not be happy doing it.

    1. Re:Ask her what she likes to do. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The fact that she got a perfect score means she's more than good at it, she's worked to learn the subject.

      Knowledge of math or any other subject for that matter is just a tool.

      She should set goals that her most reliable tools can help her reach, so she will be likely to succeed.

      No-one has just one great skill, and they all should be used to their maximum. For life is a very challenging thing; and it is best to develop natural talents as much as possible, if for no other reason than a failsafe (or Plan B).

      If you find math an easy subject to learn and use, then the person who doesn't take advantage of that to prop them up to most likely a closer/happier outcome would be, well, a fool.

      By all means she should be encouraged to seek a major career primarily doing something she doesn't find pleasure in.

      But it should be a means to an end.

      I never liked writing essays or papers for class.

      But that doesn't mean I should seek a career in which I never need to write anything.

      And If I don't like work at all.. think someone on /. can come up with a rewarding career for me that doesn't require any work??

      The same goes with all mathematics... even Calculus is such a basic skill..

      It's hard to imagine any serious professional being "good" at the subject of math and consciously avoiding using it, even when it can help benefit them in tangible ways.

      Tangible ways like being able to have a diverse understanding of things and leverage that...

  18. Women is science and games industry by LingNoi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The rub is that she doesn't like math or science, even though she finds them easy. She doesn't want to be an engineer or scientist.

    As do most women in programming and the games industry which is why I find it ridiculous to pander to all this women in the games industry bullshit.

    Let her do what she wants.

    1. Re:Women is science and games industry by Eighty7 · · Score: 1

      Let her do what she wants.

      Yeah, to quote Kumar, just cause you're hung like a moose doesn't mean you gotta do porn.

    2. Re:Women is science and games industry by metlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let her do what she wants.

      Indeed. If she wants to not use her math skills, that is entirely up to her. Why do you want to push her? One of my best friends took part in math olympiads and won - these days, she does fashion designing, and is quite happy doing that.

      That's entirely her choice, and why not?

    3. Re:Women is science and games industry by Plutonite · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is always good advice, but remember, at that age it is difficult to see the value of science. It is difficult to understand, even for college seniors in technical majors (math, natural sciences, comp.sci..etc), the immense benefit of being someone who understands how the world works. It usually takes a little sit-back and thinking to come to grips with the fact that you are proving things about the very nature of logic itself, or modelling the universe at levels the human mind did not really evolve to deal with. Anybody capable of doing science(esp at a high level), and enjoying this incredible meaningfulness and understanding (read:enlightenment) that comes as a result.. those people should be at least encouraged to pursue it. No harm could come from an honest suggestion. She may owe him so much for it later.

    4. Re:Women is science and games industry by LingNoi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anybody capable of doing science(esp at a high level), and enjoying this incredible meaningfulness and understanding (read:enlightenment) that comes as a result.. those people should be at least encouraged to pursue it.

      But she quite obviously doesn't want to do that. Don't get me wrong, anything we can do to encourage more people, women or men to enjoy science, programming, physics, etc is great.

      However I don't see any value in forcing people into the field if they quite obviously don't want to do it. I'd rather have enthusiastic people working with me, not clock watchers and that goes for both genders.

      To answer the question of what she can do instead, all I can think of is uncreative jobs:
      - accounting
      - share trader
      - lawyer
      - marketing analyst (very math heavy)

      All I can really suggest is maybe show her some cool things people make on hack-a-day and stuff like that and hope she picks up an interest.

      However, maybe it's better that she doesn't want to do something creative so people seem to get paid more money. You can always encourage her to have a creative hobby outside of her work.

    5. Re:Women is science and games industry by E++99 · · Score: 1

      That is always good advice, but remember, at that age it is difficult to see the value of science. It is difficult to understand, even for college seniors in technical majors (math, natural sciences, comp.sci..etc), the immense benefit of being someone who understands how the world works. It usually takes a little sit-back and thinking to come to grips with the fact that you are proving things about the very nature of logic itself, or modelling the universe at levels the human mind did not really evolve to deal with. Anybody capable of doing science(esp at a high level), and enjoying this incredible meaningfulness and understanding (read:enlightenment) that comes as a result.. those people should be at least encouraged to pursue it. No harm could come from an honest suggestion. She may owe him so much for it later.

      Someone who doesn't love and value math or science in high will never do so. Hoping to induce such feelings later is pointless and futile. I suspect that anyone who is destined to really contribute to those fields are already functioning as miniature mathematicians and scientists by age 6.

      And a separate point, being good at math and science != understanding how the world works, any more than being good at finance, history, art, music, philosophy, or other fields of study. And the product science is the accumulation of factual knowledge (for the experimentalists), and the formulation of models to organize and rationalize the factual knowledge (for the theorists). It is not enlightenment.

      The harm in telling a young person that they should become something that they already know they don't want to be lies in the possibility that they might believe you.

  19. NASA would be a nice destination by BhaKi · · Score: 1

    not necessarily as an astronaut. She could be an engineer or a technical manager at NASA.

    --
    The largest prime factor of my UID is 263267.
    1. Re:NASA would be a nice destination by ragendem · · Score: 1

      40 years ago the obvious answer would have been "astronaut." In fact, going into space would probably be pretty high on most peoples' list of things to do for a living.

  20. For a more serious answer: by bytethese · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Federal Agent? Whether it be FBI, NSA, DEA, DHS etc. They need 'nerdy' people. Jobs in hot areas for them are Forensic Computing, Forensic Accounting, etc. I sure there are more but those require a math/analytical mind. Plus there's potential to shoot someone...

  21. psychology by sharp3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If she enjoys psychology (or at maybe at this point just liked to talk on the phone a lot) she may want to consider that as a possibility. Research psych requires a lot of statistical and analytical skills

    1. Re:psychology by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought, though that's probably b/c I'm in a field that's a combo of cognitive psych and education. Educational research of any flavor would be another less-nerdy possibility that still requires analytical skills.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    2. Re:psychology by istefany · · Score: 1

      There is actually an entire field called quantitative psychology that is very math and statistics intensive, but all applied. If she's not interested in math-for-math's-sake, this is a viable option, because you use math (including calculus and probability) regularly, but it's applied, so you don't feel like you're just stuck doing math.

    3. Re:psychology by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      most so-called "psychology" that I've seen is a big stinky pile of bull shit.

      I know I shouldn't be feeding the troll here (mod parent down), but I got to stick up for my field. (PhD in Clinical Psych).

      Woe be unto those who mock the research of great Mad Scientists and the research conducted in the name of psychology! We lead the scientific fields in alien abduction research and other feats of astounding science. Clearly, the Anonymous Coward is unaware of their own ignorance - he or she will rue the day!

      ...*cough* ahem. I don't know what came over me there. Seriously, psychology is, as the GP poster suggested, an exciting field for those who choose to pursue it further down the line; while there are nerdy moments, there are moments of great fun and an opportunity to explore just about any human endeavor.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
  22. Digital Signal Processing? by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was pretty gifted in mathematics when I was young, to the point I would easily win school-wide maths competitions despite not working and having skipped a grade. I never worked much on it anymore until my natural aptitudes weren't enough to keep up during high school (I must point out that I'm French and not American), and I got to college (CS) without even knowing what a complex number was or what the sigma sign represented. Then I dropped out of high school for numerous reasons, one being that I performed too poorly due to my lack of interest and investment, particularly in mathematics.

    However at that time I had an idea which sounded pretty damn exciting, namely a spectrograph and spectrogram synthesiser, so I started this project and picked up C and digital signal processing, which progressively involved more and more mathematics until I would know everything about complex numbers, Fourier transforms and negative frequencies and would start scratching maddeningly long equations on sheets of paper.

    Before I picked that up I thought maths were some sort of pointless intellectual masturbation that only really served mad scientists who write papers about crap like string theory, but when I found out how it relates to all that is multimedia, and even to our senses of sight and audition, it all became very alive and interesting, and the point is, with that sort of stuff you can do anything you want. You can make your own synthesiser and make music out of it, you can create your own visual effects, or you can work for a space agency's contractor and work on systems that will be sent in space, probably a handful of other stuff that could be "creative and not too nerdy". Not too sure what "not too nerdy" involves..

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:Digital Signal Processing? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Does it get much nerdier than doing Fourier-, Laplace- and z-transfoms for a living?

    2. Re:Digital Signal Processing? by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're only the tools of the trade, and besides, while I understand perfectly what the Fourier transform does, I couldn't in any way explain how it does it nor remember half of the equation. I just do like anyone else and use a fast already-existing and well-established implementation.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  23. Duhhh!!! by pottymouth · · Score: 2

    I got a perfect score on my SAT's and ACT's. Graduated in the top 5 of graduate class at Cornell (1987) with a double Masters in Computer Science and Electrical Engineering.

    I've been a highly paid male prostitute ever since. No kidding. Just ask my pim..err boss. I earn (well over) six figures a year and all I have to do is take it up the ass 5 days a week (occasionally 6)....

    Tell your niece to become an entertainer or learn how to play a sport well (if she's black). She'll make more and have a hell of a lot better life than mucking around with technology all day long.....

    1. Re:Duhhh!!! by rta · · Score: 1

      I think this post is more the cynical rant of a mid-career engineer who's been worked over by industry for 20 years rather than an actual Troll about prostitution.

      As such, it provides legitimate, if terse and cryptic, commentary on the career trajectories of some among the mathematically inclined/adept.

      not that i'd know anything about that....

    2. Re:Duhhh!!! by pottymouth · · Score: 1

      "I think this post is more the cynical rant of a mid-career engineer who's been worked over by industry for 20 years rather than an actual Troll about prostitution"

      Mid-career!!!? Mid-career?! You mean I have as much of this ahead of me as behind?!?!? Where's that gun....

  24. some ideas by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Architecture, 3D game programming, bio-informatics, computational finance, math education.

    1. Re:some ideas by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      I would also suggest architecture. Its sort of like structural engineering, only more artsy. The difference is that between the Greeks (great architects) and the Romans (great engineers).

      I'm not sure what isn't considered nerdy about the rest of those options.

    2. Re:some ideas by D.A.+Zollinger · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest Social Informatics.

      --
      I haven't lost my mind!
      It is backed up on disk...somewhere...
  25. Is that the right question? by Hacksaw · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think the question to ask is what would bring her the most joy, which might be the thing that challenges her. She should try a little of everything, and find the thing that engages her, makes her feel alive and driven.

    I'd suggest looking into Howard Gardeners Multiple Intelligences writing to get an idea of the scope of the situation.

    --

    All the technology in the world won't hide your lack of vision, talent, or understanding.

    1. Re:Is that the right question? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think the question to ask is what would bring her the most joy

      Now that's just unrealistic nonsense.
      People need to find a appropriate mix of a career that they can both enjoy, AND one that will also allow them to support themselves, pay back their student loans, and build a future for themselves. It's part of being an adult.

      Simply put: You gotta eat. How many people do you think find their maximum joy as tax accountants?
      I like to snowboard. It's a lot of fun. That doesn't mean I expect to make a living doing it. Yes, there are people who make a living doing it, but for every 1 that does there are 10,000 that don't. If you want to be a professional snowboarder, fine give it a shot. You might want to think up a reasonable backup plan that will keep you from flipping burgers for the rest of your life.

      Or as Office Space put it:

      Peter Gibbons: Our high school guidance counselor used to ask us what you'd do if you had a million dollars and you didn't have to work. And invariably what you'd say was supposed to be your career. So, if you wanted to fix old cars then you're supposed to be an auto mechanic.
      Samir: So what did you say?
      Peter Gibbons: I never had an answer. I guess that's why I'm working at Initech.
      Michael Bolton: No, you're working at Initech because that question is bullshit to begin with. If everyone listened to her, there'd be no janitors, because no one would clean shit up if they had a million dollars.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    2. Re:Is that the right question? by dcam · · Score: 1

      I like to snowboard. It's a lot of fun.

      I know an anaesthetist who skis with an orthopaedic surgeon. The surgeon watches snowboarders come down the slope and says: I'll see you in 20 years.

      --
      meh
  26. Whatever she wants as long as it pays the bills by davidwr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously. It's her life. As long as it's legal, ethical, and either it pays the bills, it doesn't matter if she's a garbage collector or a business tycoon. Yes, it may be better for society if she were to somehow use her talents, but if her interests lie elsewhere support her in her chosen path.

    Give her your love, your emotional support, and to the extent you can and she needs it, practical/cash support.

    Now, if you'd said she's trying to make up her mind between a math/engineering profession and one that doesn't require those skills, then I would strongly recommend steering her in the direction that her talents lie. But from your submission, it sounds like she's made up her mind.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  27. Harvey Mudd College by snappyjack · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'm currently attending Harvey Mudd, and it seems to me like from just my experience here, 'math people' aren't destined to be number crunchers. Especially here, where augmenting engineering with liberal arts is intrinsic to the curriculum, I've been exposed different examples of science applied in fun and cool ways. For example: We had a chem major who went on to run a winery. cs majors who works on Hollywood special effects. Two physics majors who are now astronauts. One of the people I know is going to try and use his chem degree to restore old artwork. Another, an astrophysicist, is trying to spend a year abroad after he graduates in order to write a book about how different cultures perceive our universe. Last year, we had a research team of engineers design surfboards for 9Fish (extensive testing sessions required *wink*). The way I see it, most things that are 'fun' and 'cool' aren't pure math and science, but are never void of them either. The extent to which your daughter can apply a degree in technical fields, especially if she's *that* good at it, is limited only by her creativity.

    1. Re:Harvey Mudd College by squidfood · · Score: 1

      ...it seems to me like from just my experience here, 'math people' aren't destined to be number crunchers.

      Some years away from there and I both agree and disagree. Agree in that it was a springboard for looking for polar bears in the arctic (so cool stuff) and much more of a range then many tech schools but beware! Like the comments about MIT above, if you don't enjoy math et al. enough to sweat it for a few years, there's serious trauma and near-failure to be had (plenty leave the fields entirely with some burnout).

      Ultimately the best way is to visit universities and programs and look for the fit.

  28. Learning is fundamental by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anything. Math is the basis for biology, music, the arts (even if that math looks like chaos theory) and just about everything except (and maybe not except) philosophy. Actuary... Pay the "dues" for a few years then make big dollars and having been bored to tears the first years, get to figure out interesting problems. Like the likelihood of a death on a space trip to Mars. Useful in telling NASA how much their insurance will cost. Try to avoid being the bean counter set where you have the job of balancing law suit payouts versus thickness and grade of metal in vehicle gas tanks... But the MBA or PHD in economics from say Wharton combined with a bachelors in compsci, hard sciences, engineering, or even physics would put her a world ahead.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    1. Re:Learning is fundamental by Jerf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      just about everything except (and maybe not except) philosophy

      I have no idea what current philosophy academics are interested in, so I can't accuse them of not keeping up. But if they aren't keeping up with AI, the Simulation Argument, Bayesian theory and other such statistical things, QM's implications for the many-worlds hypothesis, and computer science research into semantics, just to pull a few things off the top of my head, they are wasting their time in several fields traditionally included under the rubric of "philosophy" (epistemology, ethics, etc.).

      We still have no rock-solid answers to speak of to the old questions, but for the first time in millennia, we actually have some data for some of them... and we're only going to be collecting more. And even what little data we have has opened up more questions; "what does it mean to be human?" will begin to take on new overtones when we start asking just exactly how augmented does an ape have to be before it is "human", just how smart does an AI have to be, and, of course, is a binary definition of "human" even feasible, and if not, what is? And so on.

      (I know for a fact there are philosophers interested in this. I simply don't know if they are in or out of the mainstream. Certainly they will eventually be in the mainstream.)

    2. Re:Learning is fundamental by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that whole field of philosophy called "logic". There has always been a strong connection between math and philosophy.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    3. Re:Learning is fundamental by tahpot · · Score: 1

      and just about everything except (and maybe not except) philosophy.

      I believe philosophers came up with a lot of the early logic work, which is very mathematical based. Without the work philosophers did on logic we wouldn't have been able to build computers.

    4. Re:Learning is fundamental by askeluv · · Score: 1

      Since most philosophy students are exposed to formal logic, it's not unlikely to end up going into more technical parts of mathematical logic. So if you're the kind of philophy student who actually think that people like Frege, or even Carnap, was on to something, being good in mathematics is definitely a benefit.

    5. Re:Learning is fundamental by wigle · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to disappoint you, but academia is still tied up with traditional philosophical issues. There are only a few departments in the US that I know of that are mostly analytic. This includes UMich, Pittsburgh, MIT, and Rutgers. I'm sure there are others. The problem is that most people get into philosophy because the "old questions" interest them. Most of the interesting issues in philosophy of science, logic, and language are just not that interesting to people. Most people want to focus on metaphysics, ethics, and other questionable areas.

      --
      ::wigle::
    6. Re:Learning is fundamental by droptone · · Score: 1

      Being in the Analytic tradition does not mean you aren't "tied up with the traditional philosophical issues". You are welcome to browse the rankings of the departments you listed. You'll notice how strong the schools are in things like metaphysics and ethics (not all are, but many are). You're also welcome to browse the rankings of schools in the area of 19th century Continental Philosophy after Hegel and 20th century Continental philosophy and notice how few top schools overall are listed there, although there is some overlap.

      Your claim about science, logic and language seems either false or very overstated. In top US programs, philosophy of language is quite strong. There are topics within philosophy of science which are fairly popular. None are as popular as ethics, but your distaste for ethics, which I share to a small degree, is not mainstream. And metaphysics is well received by many top philosophers who are quite interested in logic (some of the most notable in my mind are David Lewis and PF Strawson). If you want to remove ethics and metaphysics from philosophy then form a coherent rebuttal to the arguments that discredited logical positivism.

      --
      Every post I make begins with the assumption P=~P.
    7. Re:Learning is fundamental by iopha · · Score: 1

      I'm a philosophy PhD candidate in a top-50 North American department and from my experience--whatever that may be worth--we have been indeed paying close attention to developments in other fields, particularly those you mentioned. Several professors in the department have two or more degrees and publish outside of philosophy journals, on topics related to e.g. Bayes theorem and quantum mechanics.

      The common stereotype of the disconnected, metaphysical philosophy professor muttering from the armchair is a century gone, if it ever was true (they used to call science 'natural philosophy', after all). So to answer the parent's question: yes, it seems to me that the mainstream of analytic, North American philosophy departments is keenly interested in current scientific and mathematical research.

      This of course makes it less 'sexy' than post-modern Continental-style philosophy, which tends to dominate public perception despite its relative marginality in academia (Foucault sells more books than, say, Fodor).

      Moreover, philosophy departments want students with a strong basis in mathematics. It is probably the only humanities degree that requires an intensive formal logic course, and the study of logical systems remains an essential part of contemporary philosophical research.

      Remember that it was philosphers--Russell and Whitehead--who attempted to reconstruct mathematics on the basis of logic and set theory. Philosophers played a key role in the mathematical and logical developments of the early part of the 20th century. GÃdel was known to have attended meetings of the Vienna Circle, a group of scientifically-oriented philosophers in the interwar period.

      Arguably philosophy is the most mathematically-aware of the humanities. Graduate students specializing in logic and set theory must pass daunting competency examinations in these fields. The rigorous nature of philosophy prepares one surprisingly well for the job market, in just about any endeavour. So perhaps our friend should consider applying to a top philosophy department. Where else can one discuss the many-worlds interpretation and the brain in a vat argument in the same day?

    8. Re:Learning is fundamental by wigle · · Score: 1

      I don't really see the point of using the term 'analytic' to describe a historical tradition if it's not going to mark a distinction of some kind. Virtually every contemporary philosopher claims to be 'analytic', even if their methods vary wildly. When people start calling Plantinga an analytic philosopher, you know the term has lost most of its meaning. What I'm talking about is the tradition that focuses on analysis, which would include Frege, the Vienna philosophers, Quine, and others. However, my claims may be a bit biased since my department is a top school in history of philosophy and philosophy of religion and only has 3 or 4 professors (out of 25) that are trained to teach 'analytic' topics.

      --
      ::wigle::
    9. Re:Learning is fundamental by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      Math is the basis for so much, but no matter what profession she chooses, most of her time is going to be spent writing. Reports, design documents, advertising brochures, processes and procedures, presentation materials.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    10. Re:Learning is fundamental by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, but I bet you're still teaching Liebniz's Law (the identity of indiscernibles) as if it was true, whereas it is known to be false since the 1920's. Quantum statistics tells us that with as much certainty as we know anything.

      I know of a couple of people who are working on formal logics that violate Liebniz's Law, but they are in the tiny minority. What the others think they are doing is not clear, because they are certainly not working on logics that have anything to do with the universe we actually live in, where it is trivial to have two entities that are indiscernible by any means whatsoever, but that are not the same entity.

      Having worked with a number of philosophers over the years, including ones from first-rate schools, I have been repeatedly appalled by both their ignorance of and lack of interest in ordinary scientific truth.

      They still, for example, think the whole "brain in a vat" thing is interesting, which is laughable to anyone keeping up with neuro-chemistry and neuro-physiology, which are telling us that we think with a lot more than the lump of neurons at the top of the spinal chord, and that our ability to act on the world is at least as important as our ability to observe it (somehow philosophers tend to leave out effectors in their brain-in-a-vat fantasies.)

      If you press philosophers on these subjects it turns out that they don't mean a REAL brain in a REAL vat, but some kind of fictional, imaginary brain that fulfils whatever conditions they feel like making up to make their argument go. Again, not so interesting if you think philosophy ought to be about more than mental masturbation over imaginary worlds. The use of fantasy thought-experiments in this way by philosophers, which is totally different from the carefully-controlled thought experiments scientists use as the starting point for some arguments, is a real problem.

      And I've yet to meet a philosopher who understands conditional probability. See the rather sad debate over the "envelope game" to appreciate the consequences of that.

      Then there's that funny guy in philosophy of science who asks "suppose we were to find a substance that was identical to water in every respect but was not H2O, but rather XYZ?" This question is discussed seriously in the philosophy of science, or was ten or fifteen years ago, whereas to anyone who knows anything about how science actually works it is either incoherent or stupidly uninteresting.

      If my experience is at odds with yours, well good! I'm glad to see things are improving--there were signs of betterment on the horizon when I was involved with identity theory and quantum ontologies a decade or two ago, but it was clear there was a long, long way to go.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
  29. she can do knitting by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you know, fractal scarves and tesseract mittens with quasicrystal fabric patterns

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:she can do knitting by exploder · · Score: 1

      Creepy! I just finished making a cantor ternary set scarf.

      By the way, I crocheted it...knitting is for girls.

      --
      Yo dawg, I heard you like the Ackermann function, so OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD
  30. Industrial designer or architect. by hkz · · Score: 1

    Industrial designer or architect, depending on whether you want to design either the props or the stage of everyday life. Seriously, both are interesting, creative and fun, require an analytic mind without rubbing it in, and can be mixed with their more "serious" sister disciplines (mechanical engineering and civil engineering, respectively) at will. You have all the benefits of being able to "geek out" with the technical fundamentals, while you also have the whole human factors side. I'm an industrial design student and I find it a really well rounded field for us geeks.

  31. Exhibit A by westlake · · Score: 1

    You might begin by asking what she has against the nerd. Of course, there is always the chance she might begin by pointing to Slashdot...

  32. Space by shdowhawk · · Score: 1

    You sell it to her as being able to see the stars. There is some pretty crazy math involved in this, and you could probably get her looking at NASA and stuff like that.

    While I realize that this is still nerdy, there is some really fun things / ideas about being an astronaut (or at least directly helping them) that can come from space. Hell, have her look into space business, space travel / space hotels and stuff... it is the future after all.

    If that doesn't work... use her interests. Ex: if she likes drawing, go for a civil engineering degree. Don't be an engineer though, be an architect / designer. Lots of money opportunities for an architect who can prove that the buildings not only look good, but will actually stand! Either way, and engineering degree might be good no matter what she does, since it's a BIG resume booster... even if she ends up going into pottery making or becoming a chef.

  33. Let her decide by mmmmbeer · · Score: 1

    If she got straight A's, she must be pretty good at other subjects as well, so why are you so focused on math and science? What's interesting or fun is a matter of personal opinion, so it really doesn't matter what people here (or you, for that matter) think. Let her decide what she wants to do.

  34. Visual Effects by shidarin'ou · · Score: 1

    People knowledgeable/with degrees in math and science find themselves in high demand in a field where you spend an entire year trying to figure out how to properly generate and render the materials composing of Iron Man's suit.

    1. Re:Visual Effects by kurtoon · · Score: 1

      I came here to post this. People with a high level of math and science are in very powerful positions at visual effects an animation studios (read: Pixar, ILM). While the job may not be creative in the sense of influencing the story, the tools are all proprietary and are the engine behind making all of the images. The industry is constantly changing and studios try to stay ahead of the curve, so there is room to make a presence.

  35. architecture by krakround · · Score: 1

    it has to look good, make the client happy, and stand up.

    1. Re:architecture by plover · · Score: 1

      it has to look good, make the client happy, and stand up.

      Same could be said of a prostitute, although the standing is optional.

      --
      John
  36. Re:MIT by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Funny

    (Bernake and many federal reserve bank chiefs hail from MIT)

    Wait, I thought you said you had a stellar economics program...

  37. Whatever she wants by servognome · · Score: 1

    Let her find whatever she enjoys. Math and science are tools, and there are a number of fields that leverage these tools at the graduate level. Medicine, behavioral science, business, etc. all have heavy math when you get beyond the "intro to -" level.

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    1. Re:Whatever she wants by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      Sad that I had to scroll down this far to find someone who wants her to find what she enjoys.

      In my college days the number quoted was 2.5 for the average number of major switches per student. I doubt if it has decreased. Whatever she starts out on probably won't be what she finishes. Also, college is so different from high school that she may find that she likes math or science once she gets out of the public baby sitting service that passes for public education. On the other hand, she may find something else she really loves and that's what she should do.

      Bottom line is to get her into college and open to seeing what career possibilities are out there. Just because she got a high ACT math score is no reason to cram math and science down her throat. Let her find it.

      Cheers,
      Dave

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
  38. It's more than grades; what are her interests? by Khopesh · · Score: 1

    You don't get into a good school like MIT with just straight-A's and perfect test scores. You need to establish that you're a leader with real character and motivation. Your extra-curricular activities and your choice of electives speak highly here.

    As to what to do, that's for her to decide. She merely needs to be exposed to the options. Encourage her to follow whatever path she likes, but to consider schools with good engineering/math/science options for her to be exposed to later.

    To more directly answer your question, psychology and medicine come to mind, as do many of the tech-based artistic fields. I recall only a few years ago that the head of Northeastern University's multimedia program (within the art school rather than the computer science school) was noting that there was a great deal of scripting and other coding skills being employed by his students for their movies. The natural next step was a collection of dual-majors trickling in, marrying Computer Science with Multimedia, Digital Art, Music Technology, and Game Design (which is still in the final approval stages).

    But really, that's not important. The "right question" to ask her is: "what do you want to do, and what interests do you have right now?" It's completely normal for her to have no idea. That simply means that the college she chooses must be versatile in many directions, including where she excels by the numbers AND where she is interested (or may be interested). The point here is that you should not tell her what she should do. Just open a few doors.

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  39. Seriously? by RudeIota · · Score: 1

    "She doesn't want to be an engineer..."

    "...not too nerdy professions"

    ... and 'engineer' or 'technical manager at NASA' is what you come up with? Really???? :O

    Whooooosh!

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
    1. Re:Seriously? by BhaKi · · Score: 1

      OK. Then try the astronaut.

      --
      The largest prime factor of my UID is 263267.
  40. Just about anything - here's why. by Shag · · Score: 1

    If she has aptitude for math, science and engineering, she probably has, in broader terms, aptitude for logic, reasoning and (maybe) critical thinking.

    Those general things are going to give her an edge in just about any job that requires any kind of thinking. So she can choose just about any path, as far as I can see - her intellect will be useful even outside of math, science or engineering.

    (I'm saying this as a frustratingly rational "quick learner" who scored well, though not perfectly, on the SAT, then proceeded to drop out of college after 1 semester, and has gone on to do cool stuff in computing, music journalism, writing, photography, astronomy and international affairs.)

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  41. let her decide by Eil · · Score: 1

    Well I can sympathize with your niece, as probably many here can. In high school and college, I did extremely well in writing and English classes. More than one teacher suggested that I take up journalism or some other form of writing as a career. But the truth is that I hate writing. I mean, I have no problem with the occasional Slashdot post, email, or blog entry. But to sit down and plan out a structured approach to a written piece or spend a few hours bashing out a draft... yuck. I can do it, it comes naturally, but almost wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.

    Thankfully, I was good at something else as well and it happened to be something I enjoyed: information technology.

    Unless they're top-ranking geniuses, most smart people are good at more than one thing. I'm betting your niece is as well. What else does she like besides math and science? There's probably something (possibly something she already told you but you aren't telling us) but you're just trying to lure her into the geek trades because that's where you want her to be. That's just not the way it works.

    It's also possible that she really doesn't know what she wants to do. It's common (and often a good thing) for pre-college individuals to have no idea what to make of their future. One great thing about college is that it exposes much more of the world to people which helps them make up their minds about what to do. And of course there are people who are 40 and still aren't sure what to do with their life. Everybody's different.

    Although much about a person can change after the age of 18, almost all of it is self-change. Even if you were in her immediate family, you're exceedingly unlikely to influence your niece's decisions about her future.

  42. I'm good at math, but don't like it. by kklein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm pretty good at math, but don't particularly like it. Also, science is cool and I like reading about it, but it has always looked like a pretty dreary profession.

    Basically, though, math skills are indicative of structured, logical thought. That is useful everywhere.

    Don't push her into something just because she's good at it. Let her do whatever she wants. If she's smart, she'll probably be fine.

    1. Re:I'm good at math, but don't like it. by Asdanf · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, push her into something because she's good at it. If high-aptitude women continue eschewing careers in math and science, we'll continue to have people bemoaning the obvious gender bias in those fields (because anything but gender parity implies discrimination, right?).

  43. Question for you first by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 1

    ...are you one of those way-out-there creepy uncles? I mean, you DID just submit an Ask /. about science career possibilities for your niece.

    Getting to *your* question though, if she got a perfect score in math, but hates math, she's probably a good candidate for theater or music. When I was a film major, I knew a lot of weirdos like your niece.

  44. quantitative subjects by guacamole · · Score: 1

    Some of the fairly lucrative occupations for quantitative people are:

    actuarial science
    anything involving statistical inference
    quantitative finance

  45. Whose choice is this? by The+Absurd+Chemist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "What are some creative, not too nerdy professions that nonetheless require a talent for math, engineering, or science?"

    You are implicitly assuming here that your niece WANTS to make use of these things in her profession, which is a pretty bad thing to assume. Why don't you ask her what she wants?

    I've experienced this constantly in my life. Relatives of all sorts tell me "You should become a doctor" or "You should become a radiologist" or whatever else. I turn around and say back to them, "Hmm, sounds like if you think radiology is so wonderful, maybe you should go back to school and become a radiologist."

    It is, IMO, really rude to just start suggesting things to people. ASK what they like and what they want to do. If they don't know, there is no reason they even need to know yet.

    Ask your niece what she is interested in and support her in her choice, or if she doesn't know what she wants to do, help her lead a life where it's ok not to know yet. Don't be a dick and try to force/coerce her into math or science just because she is good at it and you want her to do it. Being good at something doesn't automatically dictate that you will enjoy a career in that field.

  46. Subect areas by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    This may be off-topic, but what about those who do well in other areas, which aren't their necessary majors? Should they switch, or go with what they "want" to do?

  47. Mythbuster. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily working for the show, but doign the various things they do. Design, destruction, whatever.

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    1. Re:Mythbuster. by TechnicalPenguin · · Score: 1

      You beat me to it. "Be a Mythbuster," was my first thought in response to this question. And the reason I thought of that is because they do such a wide variety of things, from stupid to fun to scary and dangerous, and they are always calculating how far, how high, how much explosives, etc.

      But, that just shows that math skills are useful for doing just about anything. You don't need to become an accountant or a math teacher to use math skills, the OPs niece could work on special effects, computer-generated imagery (including art, movies, or video games), build robots, or even just blow stuff up. It all depends on what she likes to do and, therefore, what she wants to do with her life.

  48. Why? by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

    So she's good at math. There's nothing that forces her to go into something math-related.

    Tell her to follow her dreams. If her dreams happen to intersect with her skills, which also happen to intersect with profitability, she's be rich, successful, and happy. If they don't, you might have to cut out the "rich" or "successful" part.

    Why do you want her to go into math or science if she has no interest? What makes you think she'll put the effort into something she finds deathly dull?

    --
    Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
  49. Sounds like me by sisina · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a woman who aced the math ACT but didn't feel like studying math or science. I was into foreign languages. So now I have a bachelor's in Spanish and a master's in French literature, and I'm a web developer. Go figure.

    What might have convinced me to study one of the hard sciences is seeing people actually at work using them. If I had met any pharmaceutical researchers or civil engineers or software developers and seen what they do at work every day, I might have found it more interesting. As it was, I had no frame of reference for working with math or science, and therefore no interest.

    1. Re:Sounds like me by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      If I had met any pharmaceutical researchers or civil engineers or software developers and seen what they do at work every day, I might have found it more interesting.

      Possibly, although from what I recall of my CS studies most of the women, those few who chose the major anyway, lost interest before completing enough pre-requisite courses to advance into the upper division classes. There were only a handful of women in my graduating class and I only knew one of them personally (she was French incidentally). It seemed like most of the smart girls ended up in chemistry or pre-med rather than engineering or computer science.

    2. Re:Sounds like me by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      My son had excellent math scores yet he chose to become a psychologist. No matter how much my parents (have been teaching math and physics in a local college since ever) and I tried to convince him, he wanted psychology.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    3. Re:Sounds like me by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 1

      software developers and seen what they do at work every day

      Reading Slashdot?

      --
      __
      Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
      GW Bu
  50. a couple examples by func · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine tracks whales in Hawaii via their songs and sonar clicks; she really enjoys it.

    I used to travel to various tropical islands setting up nuke detectors for the UN; that was a blast! Google "dream job IEEE", they do an article each year about 10 really cool engneering jobs.

  51. People good at math are often bored with it. by mkawick · · Score: 1

    A few years ago, I returned to university to study mathematics because computer science is too easy and I needed a challenge in my life. Along the way, I met this kid who was brilliant. He and I took Calc I and III together and he had close to perfect scores on all exams. I was surprised to learn that it was very easy for him, and thus boring. He decided to go into mechanical engineering. Now this is math related, but he was only interested in taking the bare minimum in math. It seemed like a waste, but for the same reasons that I took math instead of something easy, he didn't take some more math.

    I've since met at least a dozen people who were excellent at math and didn't pursue it because it was boring for them as well.

  52. Linguistics by brendank310 · · Score: 1

    I think all these strengths with no real interest in pursuing mathematics or science may lend to her being interested in linguistics.

  53. Card counting and Vegas! by blanchae · · Score: 1

    Sounds like she's perfect for counting cards at Vegas. We've all seen the movies! There ya go! Done

  54. why should she decide now? by treebeard77 · · Score: 1

    First, one of the reasons we take a variety of subjects in college is to discover just what we enjoy and find interesting. One doesn't know ahead of time what's going to "float one's boat".

    Who knows, if she takes some real math she might find something that turns her on. Maybe not. No loss.

    Secondly, I think today's generation needs to be mindful of the need for flexibility. You're probably going to have several careers, not A career. Y'all should get as good a general education as you can. It will give you more options later. The young woman in question is obviously a very bright person. I wish her happiness and a fulfilling life. She should go to a good school. I'm sure she will. If she doesn't have a guess what she wants to concentrate on, she should go to a school with lots of options so she can experiment and explore her interests. This probably means a large University.

    To repeat. This is just the beginning of a ( hopefully ) long life. Take your time. Explore. Find what you enjoy learning.

  55. My Advice: Back off by fm6 · · Score: 1

    If the girl's that smart, she'll figure things out. There are artistic disciplines where math skills are useful, but I'm not going to name them. She can find them if she wants to. and if she doesn't, a lot of unwanted advice isn't going to accomplish anything.

    Besides, she might well change her tune one she's been in college a while. If she has a natural talent for math, but hates the subject, she's probably been forced to sit through a lot of uninspired teaching. If she gets into a decent school, she'll be exposed to instructors with some capacity for instilling intellectual excitement. Then her math skills might begin to blossom. Provided a lot of meddling older relatives don't make her dig in her heels.

  56. um, anything? by Goldsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Testing well, not wanting to work as an engineer or scientist (good luck landing a good research position if that rumor starts getting around)... if you're lucky you have a future medical doctor on your hands.

    My sister was the same way: intuitively good at science, but socially programmed to not like it (is this more common in women?). It looks like she's going to study medicine. After having multiple family members, then friends, then professors tell her that she was good at scientific thinking she gradually veered towards a field she could both enjoy and excel in. I think forcing her to study a hard science would have been a big mistake.

    Just tell her that everyone changes their major (more or less true) and to take her time deciding what to do with her life.

  57. let kids do what they like, not just good at by mah! · · Score: 1

    went through elementary and high school with straight-A math grades: it was just easy and no big deal to be top of the class.
    but I did music and acting on the side, which I liked.
    then they told me I should get into math, sciences, engineering, since those are the IMPORTANT professions.
    so I did, while keeping music and acting on the side.

    decades later, I still like music and acting, and math/sciences/engineering are mostly boring now. sure they do bring some income, but if I could go back I'd choose a career in performing arts.

    moral of the story: let kids choose what they like, not just what they're good at.
    by doing what they care for, they'll get better at it, and become better professionals too.

  58. Don't pressure her by elashish14 · · Score: 1

    My first advice is to not pressure her. Give her some space, don't try to influence her too hard. People that find their profession should come about it in a way by doing things they like, not because it'll please someone else.

    As a college-level student, I'm finding that the way that we learn science and math in high school is far different from the way we learn it in college. And it's been a big turnoff for many of my friends who were strongly into math in high school and then tried to pursue it further in college.

    Let her do what she wants. Maybe she'll gravitate towards math/science once she finds out what she really wants to do and all the things you can do with it. Let her be creative and explore what she's really into though. Besides, undergraduate education isn't the most important thing; where you get your Masters/PhD is far more important if you choose that track and by sending her to a liberal arts college, you still allow her to keep her doors open. Best thing if she doesn't know what she wants to do is to go to a big university - that way you get opportunities in anything you could want.

    But honestly, I always thought that programming is really cool....

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
  59. How does she know? by LihTox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Her school experience with math is probably limited to figuring (arithmetic, algebra, calculus), which is nothing like what real mathematicians do (geometrical proofs are closer-- if geometry was her favorite math class then she is fonder of "real mathematics" than figuring, a good sign). Similarly, a career in the sciences is hard to extrapolate from a typical high school science course. In both cases, she has probably yet to see the creative side of science and math, which is where all the fun is. I'm a bit too tired to think of concrete demonstrations for her, but I might say to her, "Look, you have a talent, and life is smoother if you're working in a field in which you have talent. Of course, if you don't actually like the field then talent won't help, but try it and keep an open mind." You might try arranging a meeting with a research scientist, mathematician, or engineer. (There are also high school level competitions which could be fun, although they do look geeky.)

    Of course, if she doesn't like it, she doesn't like it-- but I hear a lot about the subtle pressures which keep the male-female ratios in physics and engineering high, and so I wonder if her reluctance is due to personal taste or peer pressure (or maybe even some teacher one time told her she was bad at math, and it stuck with her regardless of current successes).

    1. Re:How does she know? by travllr · · Score: 1

      The above advice is right on.

    2. Re:How does she know? by OurGodlivz · · Score: 1

      I agree here. I just recently graduated with a mathematics degree and found Number Theory and Abstract Algebra to be my most enjoyable classes because of the imagination they required. The higher in mathematics one goes, the more creativity and out the box thinking one needs. Still, I would suggest so go to a smaller private institution where she can have more interaction with professors and not declare a major. Just let her try some various classes she thinks she would like and see how it goes. At the top institutions you rarely get to interact with the professors because they are so large. (Until Grad school...)

    3. Re:How does she know? by dosun88888 · · Score: 1

      High school level geometry is about the worst thing in any math curriculum. Unless major changes have taken place in the last 18 years or so, it is rote memorization of theorems and dutifully writing them down in order to create two column "proofs" that are completely trivial. It's like someone who didn't know what math is decided that they had to condition rigor into their students, and came up with high school geometry.

      Just to clarify, if geometry as taught in high school were indicative of "real math" then math would be a completely worthless endeavor, and his niece would be best served to study something more useful to the world, like darts or bowling.

    4. Re:How does she know? by LihTox · · Score: 1

      If the teacher is making the students memorize the postulates and theorems, then that's pointless (particularly if they have to memorize them by number or something...BRR). But the process of deduction from a set of postulates and theorems is wildly different from anything else students do in pre-college mathematics (even in calculus), and is a core feature in mathematics. If the proofs are trivial, it's only because this is their first taste of deduction.

      It's a matter of opinion, of course.

  60. Salary level for economists by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    The salary level for economists is generally way way higher than for scientists, even at lower positions. In fact it is so much higher it rubs away anything with a "'hard sciences' feel".

    The sad part is that econometrics can be as fun as "hard science", but with a decent salary.

    When you are below 30 it might not matter, but later with kids and mortgages... :)

  61. Go applied by perrygeo · · Score: 1

    The world has many challenging problems that require the brightest minds to solve. Environmental, architecture, energy, etc. These overlap with the traditional math&sciences core but if she's motivated to "make a difference", these will be challenging on a different level , requiring social, political AND technical skill to implement correctly. Urge her to steer away from useless academic programs and focus on programs that provide 'real world' opportunities.

  62. Math is a life prereq by acozer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A good ACT score doesn't means she is a math genius nor that she needs to find a career that requires good math skills. Math is a prereq for life in general and pretty much all careers today require good logical and analytical skills that depends on strong math knowledge. Having a good ACT math score should be the rule, not the exception. Unfortunately every day we see more and more stupid people out there. Being "normal" makes you "intelligent" and this is starting to become an exception. Look at the average number of books individuals read in the US per year and compare this with 25 years ago. You will be astonished.

    1. Re:Math is a life prereq by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      Having a decent math score should be the rule... but getting a perfect score simply WILL NOT be.

      I think that math is a wonderfully important life skill, but not everyone is the same. You can no more expect everyone to get a perfect score in math than you can expect everyone to have the same sexual orientation.

      Some folks would think that spending time on poetry should be the norm. Depenging on their gender, I'd slap them in the face, or punch them in the balls. Maybe both, just for fun.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  63. She will change her mind anyway. by the_weasel · · Score: 1

    Odds are good that whatever she decides, she will end up changing her mind anyway. Virtually no one I went to school with is still doing what they started out in school for. A few are, but the majority spent a few years working (or trying to work) in their chosen fields before finding something that grabbed their 'adult' interest.

    Personally I 'wasted' my talent and school years (according to my dad) studying technical theatre. 10 years later I make visual effects software. I use the lessons I learned in school every day, just not the way I expected at the time.

    So don't sweat it. She will likely land in the right place for her eventually.

    --
    - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
    1. Re:She will change her mind anyway. by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      "Virtually no one I went to school with is still doing what they started out in school for."

      When I was in college, I could not believe how many people had no freaking idea what they even wanted to study... and we're talking sophmores and juniors, not first-semester freshmen. It completely blew my mind.

      Now that I think about it... I'd say that at least 75% of them were girls.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
    2. Re:She will change her mind anyway. by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      "So don't sweat it. She will likely land in the right place for her eventually."

      I wouldn't count on it. Surprisingly few of the people I know have ended up in the right place for them... for the reason that by the time they've really figured out what the right place for them is, it's much more difficult for them to make it happen.

      There are exceptions, though... after a few years of producing some of the most spectacular code I've ever seen, he decided that programming wasn't for him any more. He took a year off, rode a motorcycle around the country, and settled in NYC doing programming. I figure if he had a year off to think about it and look for other options (including school if he wanted it), yet still went back... it must not be that bad.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  64. Re:MIT by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

    Actually, alumni preferences take up way more slots than affirmative action. More likely some asshole from Long Island is taking your daughter's spot.

    http://rationalitate.blogspot.com/2008/03/rigged-college-admissions.html

  65. In this economy? by jfern · · Score: 1

    You can have fun being unemployed.

  66. Re:Stop playing dad to your neice by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

    I'm sure she'll figure it out.

    Don't be so sure of yourself, AC. This is a great question. I wish I had an uncle to dig around for some career options when I was 18. I bounced around majors, wasting 45 hours of credit until I decided on a major that sounded cool and had a lot of syllables. I've been working my damnedest ever since to break out of the field. I'm 40. No matter which way I turn, I get sucked back in because I'm good at science stuff. Problem is that science is a bullshit career. I'm speaking as someone who has been doing it for about one career's worth. If I had a little help back in the day, I think someone would have helped me figure out that I would be best as a computer scientist rather than a biochemist. Once you have a truckload of degrees and a life, its hard to go back and start a new career. Better is to explore options early on and decide what compels you. I think its great this guy is helping his niece. Not everyone has educated parents that understand the unique needs of gifted children.

    --
    Just callin' it like I see it.
  67. Game Physics by RevWaldo · · Score: 1, Funny

    Particularly female anatomy. Who better than another female to work such things out?

    It's important dammit!

  68. Math required for Econ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You took the wrong courses - plenty of undergraduate econ classes require fairly advanced Math - especially the ones that necessary for being able to succeed in grad school.

    The econ classes divide into two different types - 1) the crap where you talk about lines on graphs where the most complicated math involved is y=mx+b. 2) The hard stuff that is required to prepare you for grad school. Most people self-select into the easy stuff.

    Here's an example of an undergrad course that most every grad school econ student should have completed in their undergrad work - http://www.washington.edu/students/crscat/econ.html

    ECON 481 Introduction to Mathematical Statistics (5) NW
    Probability, generating functions; the d-method, Jacobians, Bayes theorem; maximum likelihoods, Neyman-Pearson, efficiency, decision theory, regression, correlation, bivariate normal. Prerequisite: STAT/ECON 311; either MATH 136 or MATH 126 with either MATH 308 or MATH 309. Recommended: MATH 324. Offered: jointly with CS&SS/STAT 481; A.

    Look at those pre-reqs:

    Math 126/136 - 3rd quarter of calculus or honors 3rd quarter of calculus - Introduction to Taylor polynomials and Taylor series, vector geometry in three dimensions,introduction to multivariable differential calculus, double integrals in Cartesian and polar coordinates.
    Math 308 - MATH 308 Matrix Algebra with Applications (3) NW
    Systems of linear equations, vector spaces, matrices, subspaces, orthogonality, least squares, eigenvalues, eigenvectors, applications. For students in engineering, mathematics, and the sciences.
    MATH 309 Linear Analysis (3) NW
    First order systems of linear differential equations, Fourier series and partial differential equations, and the phase plane.
    MATH 324 Advanced Multivariable Calculus I (3) NW
    Topics include double and triple integrals, the chain rule, vector fields, line and surface integrals. Culminates in the theorems of Green and Stokes, along with the Divergence Theorem.

    They don't even bother to list differential equations as a pre-req as it is pre-req for other classes listed above.

    Many years ago, I took the above mentioned ECON 481 when I was a senior in college (thinking I wanted to go on to grad school). I was very good at math and science I had tested out of freshman year calculus via AP exams (5 on the Calc BC), and physics (5 on the Physics C w/ Caculus and Physics E&M exam), and went on to take second year physics and second and third year of math and done very well in all of them.

    Even with all of that preparation when it came time to take ECON 481, it was a struggle - probably the hardest class I ever took.

    1. Re:Math required for Econ by dbIII · · Score: 1
      This is unfortunatly the point where all the engineers in the place go "so?" just as it would be if an engineer complained to a physicist or mathematician about all the mathematics that they had to study back in the day.

      It does however get the message across that more study is required than the fortune telling stereotype. It must be paticularly heavy going in a nation where most schools have abandoned the teaching of calculus at a high school level.

    2. Re:Math required for Econ by Malekin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ECON 481 Introduction to Mathematical Statistics (5) NW
      Probability, generating functions; the d-method, Jacobians, Bayes theorem; maximum likelihoods, Neyman-Pearson, efficiency, decision theory, regression, correlation, bivariate normal. Prerequisite: STAT/ECON 311; either MATH 136 or MATH 126 with either MATH 308 or MATH 309. Recommended: MATH 324. Offered: jointly with CS&SS/STAT 481; A.

      Look at those pre-reqs:

      Math 126/136 - 3rd quarter of calculus or honors 3rd quarter of calculus - Introduction to Taylor polynomials and Taylor series, vector geometry in three dimensions,introduction to multivariable differential calculus, double integrals in Cartesian and polar coordinates.
      Math 308 - MATH 308 Matrix Algebra with Applications (3) NW
      Systems of linear equations, vector spaces, matrices, subspaces, orthogonality, least squares, eigenvalues, eigenvectors, applications. For students in engineering, mathematics, and the sciences.
      MATH 309 Linear Analysis (3) NW
      First order systems of linear differential equations, Fourier series and partial differential equations, and the phase plane.
      MATH 324 Advanced Multivariable Calculus I (3) NW
      Topics include double and triple integrals, the chain rule, vector fields, line and surface integrals. Culminates in the theorems of Green and Stokes, along with the Divergence Theorem.

      I really don't mean to sound like a snob, but that stuff doesn't strike me as particularly esoteric. I was led to believe that in the US system, the first digit of the unit code typically represents the year it is taken at. Taylors series and multivariable calculus is high school maths. Seriously, the chain rule is introduced at third year? Fourier series is something you should have a handle on in high school physics (fundamental wave behaviour) and have codified in first year. Third year mathematics should be things like advanced cryptanalysis, combinatorics, fluid dynamics, geometry and topology, not introduction to the concept of a matrix or a double integral.

      If this is the general standard set by US universities, you're worse off than I thought you were.

    3. Re:Math required for Econ by artor3 · · Score: 1

      I was led to believe that in the US system, the first digit of the unit code typically represents the year it is taken at.

      Not in my experience, no. I was taking 6000-level courses by my 3rd year, and a quick look at MIT's OCW shows some 900-level courses advertised as being for undergrads (and some 200-level courses for grads only).

      Additionally, given the other topics in Math 324, I'd expect the chain rule they mention to be in reference to tensor fields, not just just simple use you learn in high school calc.

    4. Re:Math required for Econ by stewbee · · Score: 1

      Oh get off your high horse!

      I will be the first to agree that our high schools need help, but when you start demeaning the US system because we didn't teach Fourier series in high school is just plain snobbery. And really, what is the point of teaching Fourier series in high school? Did it really solidify the underlying physics concepts to you? To me, focusing too much on the math would just detract from what they are really trying to teach, which are the concepts. Hell, physics wouldn't exist as a serious filed of study without calculus, but that doesn't mean that you can't teach physics if the student doesn't have an understanding of the calculus. My high school physics course did not introduce one derivative or integral explicitly. That doesn't mean that we couldn't the math, it just means that we were given the solutions to the integrals and derivatives already to plug and chug. Is it as elegant as knowing that d(t) = a*t^2/2 + vo*t + do comes from solving two integrals? No, but it does show me that I can solve for a distance at time t if I know the initial conditions.

      There is fundamental difference the way US school systems are and other systems are. I think you will find that the emphasis for hard work is in college and easier in high school in the US, where as the university in other nations is the easier. (This is not my own experience; others have told me this). The fact that the math classes are teaching Fourier series, Taylor's theorems, etc in college is not surprising since to fully understand them would need some more experience as to why we would use them.

  69. Don't push her by iceco2 · · Score: 1

    The real question is not how to make math intresting but how
    to make a career out of whatever intrests her.
    I have seen many people(my girlfreind for one) who studied
    Computer Science because it was what the smart kids did
    and has plenty of money in it. Only to discover that debugging
    for 9-10 hours a day is not her cup of tea, and now look for other
    lines of work(something with animals) even though they make excellent money
    in an engeneering job they do not enjoy.
    Figure out what you enjoy doing, then figure out how to make money doing it.

  70. Aptitude != Interest by QuantumHobbit · · Score: 1

    Some people can have a lot of skill in a subject yet still be uninterested in it and perform poorly due to their lack of interest. A relative of mine had great grades in Biology in undergrad(GPA = 3.99), so her professors pushed her into medical school. She made good grades but didn't enjoy what she was doing so after 2 years and a huge amount of debt quit. She now works in the school system and loves her job.

    Telling someone that they should do something solely because they are smart will end badly. Gifted student often feel an obligation to use their gifts. This is usually good. But it can cause a gifted student to persist in a career that she doesn't enjoy. So encourage your niece to achieve, but make sure she is happy with that path first.

  71. Art by muridae · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, now that everyone here is done laughing, let me explain the logic.

    I'm working my way through a CS degree. The math classes are interesting, but the CS stuff is all 'we'll pretend this is how theory works out in the real world, while pretending to teach you how the theory works in the labs.' Interesting, but not particularly useful except when teaching. Somehow, without any art background other then some highschool photography, I got into a Cyberart cross discipline class. I expected to be the hired coder, there, just working on someone else's idea. Turned out to be the best class I've ever taken.A year later, I'm working for the Art Department, writing code for 3 different grants and two class projects.

    And no, CS wasn't a pre-requisite for any of these projects.

    1. Re:Art by destroyer661 · · Score: 1

      I'm working my way through a CS degree. The math classes are interesting, but the CS stuff is all 'we'll pretend this is how theory works out in the real world, while pretending to teach you how the theory works in the labs.' Interesting, but not particularly useful except when teaching.

      I wanted to get into computer programming and a friend of mine was taking CS and asked me whether I'd rather write code and produce things, or whether I wanted to learn about writing code, and learn about how to produce things. I said the more practical obviously and ended up choosing college over university. (In Canada btw) My friend says CS is so much theory and not enough practicality for him to put it to use outside of academia.

      --
      #define true false // Have fun debugging!
  72. Duh... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Blow stuff up.

    Oh wait you mean for a career? Well, uhmm I don't know, but in her spare time, she should definitely blow stuff up.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  73. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  74. 150 comments & no-one suggests Finance/Managem by milkasing · · Score: 1

    Lots of engineers at some point in their career get a business degree /move to management. Also one of the top careers Math Majors are go into after graduation is Financial Analysis. If she likes it she could really excel in Business / Finance. A scientific temprament and good math / statistical skills are essential for analysis. A plus is that she will not be required to learn some of the more arcane math subjects that can turn off even people who thought they liked math. Also, her college program is less likey to consume all her free time in a way engineering programs tend to do. Givn her scores, most business programs would probably love to take her (her gender will also help her in the admission process)

  75. So... what DOES she want to be? by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    The article talks only about how good her grades are in math and how she doesn't want to be an engineer or scientist. Consequently the replies have been about how she could use her math skills in other professions.
    The article also states very high grades in other subjects though. So it seems to me she can be whatever she wants to be, as far as academic skills are required. Sadly though, neither the writer of the article nor the replies seem to care about what she actually DOES want to be.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  76. Respect her coices by jandersen · · Score: 1

    I would say that the starting point for any advice would have to be that whatever she wants to do is what she should do. It is more important that she is happy with her life and career; being famous, rich or doing something incredibly important is not necessarily a top priority. As Einstein once said, I believe, it isn't intelligence that does it, but creativity and hard work - both of which require a deep interest rather than aptitude.

    When you say that is "good at maths" - what exactly does that mean? I was brilliant at maths in school, but unfortunately in school all you were required to learn in order to pass the tests was a handful of simply formulas and rules; when I started at mathematics at the university, I realized that I hadn't learned anything about the important bits: the methods, such as the epsilon/delta argument etc. What helped me through was that I found an interest in the more philosophical aspects of science - what is a number, what is continuity etc when you step away from the naive intuitions that we have learned?

    Another thing is that when I grew up, science was cool - we felt that we just about to conquer space, faster-than-light travel was just around the corner - but looking back I think that perhaps I would actually have preferred a career in biology, which is my other, big interest. At that age - late teens - you are only beginning to realize what it is you actually want. Fortunately, it isn't too difficult to change study direction within your general area; if she has an interest in natural sciences, she could start on maths and change to biology or physics a little later.

    I think my best advice for her and those around her would be to try to experience more of what eg. maths and physics are actually about at college level and beyond. Let her visit some of the places and don't try to push her in any direction; she won't be able to make an informed choice based only on the experience she has from school.

  77. a score on a test is a number by ffflala · · Score: 1

    It's a test score.

    She's a smart cookie. She should not plan the rest of her life based on this.

    The ACT is a standardized test, with five sections. Trying to branch out to a career based on these five paths is a false start.

    A very good way to identify a career is to identify what you DON'T like. She may not like math and science (or she may not actually have a realistic idea of what those fields are).

    She needs to explore. Let her. Let's be honest: her undergrad major really doesn't matter all that much, in comparison to doing well in her studies --and THAT only matters if you'll be going for higher education.

  78. This was me almost 20 years ago. by Wasabica · · Score: 1

    I was good at science, won lots of awards, so I just fell into majoring in Biology/Molecular Genetics. (This was before computer science degrees were mainstream, especially for women.) I realized the error of my ways within a few years of graduating. Long story short, I now direct Internet Marketing for a large company. Internet Marketing is very hot, interesting, and lucrative; some might even find it glamorous. It requires extremely strong analytical ability, as Direct/Database Marketing skills are required for the kind of Internet Marketing I do. I also direct creative, in context of both website design as well as marketing banners and emails, so I get to apply right-brain skills as well.

  79. Perhaps reconsider an engineering career.... by sazy · · Score: 1

    Unless I miss my guess, she's probably drawn to glamour and popularity and fame. I think I'd paint a bright picture for her in Mechanical Engineering..., within the Auto Racing community. The teams and owners of NASCAR, F1, IRL, ALMS-Lemans and Grand-Am are constantly looking for new engineering talent. Toyota, Ford, GM, Honda, Audi, BMW, Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, Ferrari and Renault are just the auto makers that have teams. Most oil companies also have sponsored teams, too, McLaren engines and gearboxes, the list just goes on and on. But, the peques and bennies are the trump suit here, traveling the world to such locations as Brazil, Spain, Germany, Australia and China, just to mention a few, would be part of her job. Dining with, chatting to and generally associating with the likes of Michael Schumacher, Danica Patrick, Fernando Alonso, Felipe Massa.., all part of the job. Yeah, I think that would be something she could make a living at and more then enjoy herself in the process. I wish her luck no matter what road she takes.

  80. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  81. Manipulation and Interfering Relatives by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

    Your attitude and intelligence is probably the same as many others who posted here. If you haven't been promoted into Management already then I would be surprised.

    Since your niece obviously doesn't want to pursue a career or education that involves either (MIT level) Mathematics or Science then it is illogical that you posted a question involving your niece that is about getting into a career that involves Mathematics and Science. What your question should have been is something like "What type of education and careers can my niece pursue that involves creativity, but without the need for MIT level Mathematics or engineering."

    Your whole Slashdot article/question is an obvious Troll. You could have been more obvious (and honest) by asking something like this, "How can I manipulate my niece into pursuing an engineering career so that I can feel self-important through my niece?".

  82. Re:Would have to work for the MRS degree... by SmokeyTheBalrog · · Score: 4, Funny

    My god, it's the complete Red vs Blue set of trolls.

    I wonder what they go for on ebay?

    Item #xxxxxxxxxx
    Matching set of trolls.
    Look exactly the same except for hair. (Hair colors: Over Antagonizing Red, and Very Melancholy Blue)
    (Bridge not included)

    In need of a good home, and a lot of lightening up.

    Buy it now?

  83. Architect by vectorious · · Score: 1

    You have to have a good understanding of the engineering such that you can design deliverable projects, so it is where design meets engineering.

  84. Don't overlook the health professions by schlangus · · Score: 1

    As someone else already said, most health professions require a strong math and science aptitude and much prerequisite coursework in those areas. Strong grades in those courses do much to get into those schools. Check out pharmacy, nursing, MD, etc. These professions pay fairly decent as a bonus, but that of course shouldn't be the sole reason to pick one of these professions.

  85. Respect her *choices by Airborne-ng · · Score: 1

    Your niece is smart, no arguing that. And as a woman she will generally do the opposite of whatever you would push her to do, no matter her aptitude haha. One important aspect in your post I see is the difference in age, you will not understand her views and it's useless to try. What you can do is sit back and provide useful real-world applicable knowledge and let her figure it all out. It's what she is good at, but if it's not what she loves....then it's all water under the bridge. Best of luck.

  86. Economics is little more than numerology by dbIII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    functional analysis while applicable in theory, has little to say about relevant real world economics

    Hang on. When did they put away the tea leaves and numerology and start putting together working models of very complex systems like portions of an economy? You'll be telling me there are economists that consider non-linear relationships between things next.

    Anecdote: The leading Australian economist's answer to a low wool price was to kill a lot of sheep to make wool scarce. That actually happened. A lot of farmers dutifully killed off most of their flocks, wool was a bit rarer but the price didn't go up because cotton exists. That's some "real world economics" as an example to show how stupidly simplistic their models are and how riduculously overcondent they are about them.

    1. Re:Economics is little more than numerology by try_anything · · Score: 1

      And the bigger and harder their model is, the more ridiculously overconfident they are.

      The difficulty of economics is well illustrated by how easily the stock market and the finance industry are swayed by intellectual fads. Of course, good models can't replace fads, because they don't promise neverending risk-free market-beating returns. What you really need is models so complicated that no one can tell whether they're good or bad.

      And that's exactly how we created the credit crisis.

    2. Re:Economics is little more than numerology by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Anecdote: The leading Australian economist's answer to a low wool price was to kill a lot of sheep to make wool scarce. That actually happened. A lot of farmers dutifully killed off most of their flocks, wool was a bit rarer but the price didn't go up because cotton exists. That's some "real world economics" as an example to show how stupidly simplistic their models are and how riduculously overcondent they are about them.

      Question: did the economist in question have any investments in the cotton industry ?

      Never ascribe to incompetence what can be adequately explained by malice, at least when talking about lawyers, economists or politicians.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:Economics is little more than numerology by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Anecdote: The leading Australian economist's answer to a low wool price was to kill a lot of sheep to make wool scarce. That actually happened. A lot of farmers dutifully killed off most of their flocks, wool was a bit rarer but the price didn't go up because cotton exists. That's some "real world economics" as an example to show how stupidly simplistic their models are and how riduculously overcondent they are about them.

      [citation needed]

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  87. There is no "Math" or "Science" Career by The+Identity · · Score: 1

    I had top scores in math and science in high school, and I found the course material terrifically dull. However, the subjects taught in high school are not representative of careers; they contain general information intended to give useful knowledge for the average citizen.

    Fortunately, there is an institution specifically designed for your daughter: the liberal arts college. She will dabble in courses pertinent to a variety of careers ranging from journalism to astrophysics. Outside the classroom she can testify in mock trial or play ultimate frisbee. Even is she is not certain of a career path at graduation, she will have a strong skill set as well as exposure to careers.

    At this point, the onus is on you. Get your daughter to have as many new experiences as she can, particularly related to her interests. If she likes caring for her dog, have her shadow a physician. Also, try to have your family and friends bring up their occupations when they're over for dinner. Hopefully she will continue this exploratory trend into her undergraduate years and find something which makes her want to get up in the morning.

    Your daughter is lucky to live in a country where she will have unsurpassed freedom to choose her career. She will be fine as long as she keeps an open mind.

  88. Creativity+math? by wizzor · · Score: 1

    Upon reading the original post there was a one strong association in my mind: Architecture. In the design of structures sciences and math is of extremely high importance (so the buildings won't collapse) but it's also a creative field that involves much more than just hard science.

    1. Re:Creativity+math? by NerveGas · · Score: 1

      You don't know many architects, do you? While a very few get into it because they're brilliant artists, a LOT get into it because they aren't smart enough for engineering.

      The architects don't make sure that the buildings don't fall down, that's the engineer's job. And you'd be amazed at how often the engineers tell the architects what is required to make that happen, the architects to off, draw something up, and turn it over to the engineers... who realize that the architects failed in exactly the same way they were warned NOT to.

      I've know a bunch of architects, and the only one who every impressed me had quit architecture and went on to other things.

      And... of the architects I've known, those who aren't the "cream of the crop" haven't really made that good of money, considering their degree.

      --
      Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  89. Easy... by Bloater · · Score: 1

    Medicine and Sports Science
    (The two go hand in hand - they could both come under the umbrella of "phisicianism" :)

  90. Huh... by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    " The rub is that she doesn't like math or science, even though she finds them easy. "

    When I took the ACT, I got a perfect score on math as well, even though I hadn't taken a math class in the last 1.5 years, I'd been slacking off.

    But... I don't care for math, either. I don't dislike it, but it doesn't excite me. Once, talking to a girl in my physics class, I said something about how only people with the most psychotic minds would major in math... to be informed that she was a math major. Ah, well.

    Let's see... no engineering or "scientist" position, yet science-oriented. Doctor? I would have said genetecist, but that's probably a bit to "scientisty" for her. The awesome thing about being a doctor is that it encompasses a pretty wide range, from "I want to nurture and help little kids" to "I don't want to deal with people, I just want to cut them up." Something for every personality!

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  91. Re:Fighter Pilot. by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    They let women fly, now? When did that happen?

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  92. Sound Engineer by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

    I did my degree in sound engineering. It has the maths and science (applied, electricity and waves), yet it has the fun part of music production (studio, live and film sound).

    The university even went out and bought a pub so we could do some live sound. Nothing like learning in class and drinking at the same time.

    I didn't pursue the production side, and now I work in analogue and digital hardware design, just because I'm different and wanted to push my skills.

  93. Sure you need "creative"? by midnighttoadstool · · Score: 1

    The irony of modern education is that creative subjects, like Art, give the kids the satisfaction of actually making something even though the results are of no practical use to anyone, while practical subjects, like physics, are not taught in a manner that has much if any practical application.

    An utter waste.

    What makes learning compelling is practical production, actual concrete results, even better: ones that make money. Learning for the sake of learning is pointless, and for some a torture.

    I reckon creativity is the handmaiden of practicality: practicality comes first. Find that kid a real purpose to use their maths, and then make it creative.

  94. Depends on her interests by spud.dups · · Score: 1

    Really I see everyone in these fields having to make the choice between a "Greek" or a "Roman" education. That is (as explained in the preface of Mathematics: From the Birth of Numbers) she will have to decide whether she wants industrialize or philosophize her talents. Go the path of Bertrand Russel, or Jack Kilby. If she want cash, then she should become an engineer. If she likes to theorize about things no one else really cares about, then become a university professor doing research.

    I guess in more seriousness, math will help her in almost any field. The problem solving strategies that one learns while developing their first rigorous proof will be a bonus in any field, and math in general is applicable to almost anything. Also, you could see how inquisitive she is on these things when presented with a challenge. For example, have her research the Collatz Conjecture and see if she finds it fun to solve a problem just because it hasn't been solved. Math at the higher levels is much more creativity and deep thinking then the 'holy crap my calculator could do this' math of high school.

    As you can probably tell, I didn't have a lot of friends growing up. But hey, I didn't really care. Now I'm a digital systems analyst/program optimizer and I love it. Of anything, I would just say don't let academia ruin a possible interest. All the qualification and quantification that they put you through can really destroy a kids desire to learn just because they want to.

  95. a business degree by Kevin143 · · Score: 1

    She could get a business degree. There is always room for creativity as a business person. It also pays better than science.

  96. MIT Comparative Media Studies program by JavaTHut · · Score: 1

    See the Comparative Media Studies program at MIT -- exactly designed for people who got into MIT, but then decided they wanted to combine those abilities with something broader.

  97. ARSS (offtopic) by korean.ian · · Score: 1

    So is ARSS basically a FOSS implementation of Metasynth? Cool if it is. Especially if you keep up development.

    1. Re:ARSS (offtopic) by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Well yes and no. Basically, Metasynth is a sort of very fancy MIDI editor. i.e. you draw a line and it sounds like an oboe or something. ARSS is more complete in that you can create any sound with it but it's lower leveled so it'll be harder to make it sound like an oboe. Also, you can turn sounds into images you can turn back into sounds, so you can do a bunch of stuff with that.

      As for future developments I'm working on a commercial program that derives from it with a cool interface, much faster, and an emphasis on image to sound synthesis. It's designed to make messing around with images as simple, straightforward, flexible and fun as possible. I'm planning on releasing it in a few weeks.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
  98. If she does not like it, she should not do it. by w4rl5ck · · Score: 1

    She should do what she likes, nothing else. If she talented and open-minded, she should be able to choose for herself - nothing to achieve by "useful suggestions".

    Forcing someone into science just because she has talent to handle numbers is just stupid. I know very capable people who did what they like, which wasn't at all what their "feats" would have suggested, and they feel very lucky. On the other hand I also know students who had to fight for every exam, every grade, because the where not that talented or gifted or whatever - but they did it, because it was what they wanted to do - and they achieved what they wanted to do. And they are lucky.

    And there are those gifted who rushed through academic career, but simply don't like what they do now for a living at all. They are those who are unlucky.

    What counts, after all? Luck, or money? I choose luck - it seems, natural, somehow.

  99. That's easy. by achenaar · · Score: 1

    Evil genius.

  100. Natural Sciences? by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1

    My advice would be to: (a) do a course with some physical sciences and mathematics; and hence (b) put off making a decision for or against specializing in mathematics; and finally (c) probably end up doing some go physical science subject, where you can use your secret math superpowers to overtake the others.

    Cambridge (not that Cambridge, the UK one) offers a degree in Natural Sciences. I was able to study Physics, Maths, Chemistry, & Materials Sciences. I was good at maths, and was offered the chance at the end of my second year to transfer to doing maths. There are probably similar options in the US. I chose to give up maths. Though it was probably my best subject, I got to met people that were a lot better than me. I also liked doing stuff with my hands. There are plenty of applied maths subjects. Don't get put off by people who spend 40 years in an attic proving the Riemann hypothesis - both my parents were mathematicians, but they did practical things in aircraft design. For me, doing an experiment with something real seemed important to me then, and still does now. Also, if you are armed with a bit more than your fair helping of maths skills, then you get to see farther than the others in many fields that are less mathematical.

    Plenty of posters have said variants on "Let her do what she wants". At that age, I had no idea what I wanted - I just wanted to be - well - effective at something. Lots of people want to be something in particular, but some of us don't have specific ambitions. Back then (the early seventies) astronomy was doing huge things, and I would have loved to be part of that, but it was all happening as I was getting my degree, and I was too early. I wanted to bring maths to materials science, but I was too early for that by about 30 years (good now, though).

    Good luck!

  101. ...if she has any clue by JavaRob · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The tough thing for high schoolers trying to choose a college, major, FUTURE, etc. is that they usually have no *clue* what they'd like to do in the real world, because they haven't had much contact with it.

    The vast majority of science and math education for a high schooler is learning how to jump through mental hoops and regurgitate information to pass exams. There's a big gap between studying a subject in school and *using* the skills related to a subject in a job somewhere.

    A lot of job satisfaction lies in working with people you respect, who respect you for playing an important role in fulfilling whatever goal the company has. The tasks you perform should also ideally fall into a comfort zone where you're using your talents without being in way over your head.

    I tend to think most kids will do best with a broad education with as many internships, etc. as possible, so they can try out different kinds of work environments.

    The highschooler in question might end up using math in her job -- if she's good at it, that part will go easily -- and may well be extremely interested if she's interested in the goal she's actually accomplishing. Why would she need to be interested in jumping through hoops?

    1. Re:...if she has any clue by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      The tough thing for high schoolers trying to choose a college, major, FUTURE, etc. is that they usually have no *clue* what they'd like to do in the real world, because they haven't had much contact with it.

      I majored in "electives" for two years at a low-cost community college. Dropped out, and worked for a while. Only then did I find what I wanted to do.
      My high school guidance counselor was convinced that I needed to be an engineer because I was good at math and science (although not 800 on the SAT good). I didn't care that I was good at it, it didn't inspire me.

      Now I design human-computer interfaces for assistive devices for people with disabilities. I didn't even realize that job existed in high school; it was strangely missing from those career-matching tests that my guidance counselor loved so much. The math and science skills have been highly useful, even in a very human-centered/social-science field. (And I've got a degree in something that there are more academic positions than there are PhDs to fill them.)

      My advise to every new grad is explore and do what you like.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    2. Re:...if she has any clue by JavaRob · · Score: 1

      When I went to college, I thought I might major in creative writing (I'd written some short stories and a bunch of poems, and enjoyed English classes) or maybe music (I played a couple of instruments and sang in the choir).

      I settled on the music major, because I was still basically adrift as a sophomore... but then I ran across compsci, in an elective class, and found it intriguingly useful -- I don't think I'd had any exposure whatsoever to programming before that intro class. It caught my attention in a way that math & science never had, and I seemed to pick it up a lot faster than the other kids in the class. So I took a bunch of compsci classes in my last 2 years, dove into a few relatively ambitious solo projects, and now I've been a software developer for 10 years.

      I'm glad I didn't go to a conservatory or something like that.... I figured out in the process of completing the music major (and doing an internship in a studio one summer) that I like my music better as a hobby.

  102. All depends.... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

    depends on her personal preferences.

    Finance used to be popular... If you think engineering school is a drag, architecture school is much worse, but it's a bit more glamorous.

    Whatever she decides to study, she should go ahead and take all the math that her University offers, including an advanced degree or two. Her talent will make it easy, and having the math degrees on paper combined with whatever she studies for fun (drama, education, medicine, polysci, international commerce, whatever) will make her unusually valuable in her field.

  103. OU by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    Let her try some university-level online short courses from the Open University (OU). This will also speed up her university admission.

  104. Well basically she gonna be fine.. by pmelendezu · · Score: 1

    A high math skill is convinient in almost every degree that she could choose. But if you want to give her some options she could be a 3D animator, Videogames developer, Artificial Intelligence developer o scientist, etc. Anyway, I think could be more useful if you dig in her other skills and preferences to figure out which other degree is suitable to her

  105. Day trading by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

    No need to work for "the man", good money, and you get to put your math/analytical skills to work. Stocks, options, futures and forex are where the action is today.

  106. Send her to HMC by systemeng · · Score: 1

    Suggest she apply at Harvey Mudd College "The Liberal Arts College of Science and Engineering" Four years of hanging out with people that all had those qualifications will give her a chance to figure out what she likes. (I'm not unbiased because I went to Harvey Mudd.)

  107. Finance by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    Many of the more esoteric financial disciplines require a lot of math; as do even the basic stuff such as M&A. As a result Wall Street has hired a lot of physics/math majors over the years; if she doesn't want to major in those areas then business is an option. Even so, I'd load up on math.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  108. Something Else by burritomonkey · · Score: 1

    I got my BA in Math several years ago and wound up becoming a carpenter. While I wouldn't say I use my upper level math skills in my day to day work, I do use the logic skills for problem solving, as well as some of the homeowners can be impressed that they've hired someone who is (hopefully) a little more intelligent and respectable than the other guy. And for a bonus I stay in way better shape that I could if I were a desk jockey. There is certainly more to the world of math than becoming a teacher or an engineer, it's just harder to realize...

  109. Make Chocolate!` by Choco-man · · Score: 1

    My degrees are in biology, chemistry, and genetics. After i got them, i realized i hate fundamental research (timing's everything, right?). By accident more so than by plan, i fell into making chocolate for a living, and for the last dozen years, that's what i've done. I get to use my talent in science (formulations, fluid dynamics, etc), and if you're on the supply side of chocolate mfr (ie industrial supplier to users), there's a huge social component as well - i was the technical services manager for many of those years, which involves teaching others how to use chocolate, technical sales, trade shows, and lots of travel. It was great fun.

  110. Find out what you enjoy by cbrew · · Score: 2

    High school math and science are not as much fun as the things that a good college education can show you. Math and science skills can serve you really well in linguistics, psychology, marketing, political science, cognitive science, neuroscience, biology, finance, business, medicine and other fields. I teach linguistics and computer science, and recommend both, but the key thing is to encourage her to take a look at several possibilities early in college, or even sooner. Two other thoughts: firstly, peer group is important, any subject is nicer if you are doing it in group of people you like and get on with. Secondly, as people have said, the standard high school subjects do get much more interesting with further study.

  111. Investment Banking? by OceanKiwi · · Score: 1
    either that or accounting. Both require fairly strong maths and of late are incredibly creative.

    As for not too nerdy, I don't think that will matter quite so much when she's driving a car worth more than her classmates are likely to make in their lifetime.

    Fun? Sure. Think of it as a game where you get to take money from fools and bend the rules of the game as much as possible while avoiding the authorities. Pretty much the same as Grand Theft Auto, but without the Auto part.

    --
    + An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it. +
  112. Why Are Nerds Unpopular? by arkarumba · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm not sure if this applies directly, but your query reminded me of a great article Why are Nerds Unpopular that some here may enjoy.

    If you decide it appropriate for your neice to read, it may spark some discussion comparing school maths/science to university maths/science. Find out what she is interested in.

    One way ahead is to encourage her to consider only a five year career plan. Neither she nor yourself should feel her choices NOW lock her into a lifetime in one career. People often don't find out what the REALLY want to do with their lives until they've been in the real world for a few years. She should leave her options open. Encourage her to do whatever she feels like doing now, but whatever course, keep some higher level maths as a minor. It may end up giving her the edge someday.

  113. Stellan Skaarsgard, is that you? by Internalist · · Score: 1

    Shades of "Good Will Hunting", here...

    My first answer is to echo what a lot of other posters have said, and help her figure out what it is she wants. If she can find something that she can be truly impassioned about, then she'll have a leg up on most other kids starting uni. Of course, she's still pretty young, so she might not know yet what turns her crank.

    On the other hand, I've often said that if I could go back to uni and do another undergrad, I'd do math for sure. There are just so many doors that math leaves open, and the kind of thinking the various maths foster is useful.

    On the third hand, if you really want a concrete suggestion other than math/science, I'd go with Linguistics or Cognitive Science (but I may be biased ;). Have her check out the NACS program at Maryland, or CogSci at Johns Hopkins, or Linguistics or CogSci at MIT. Or the Symbolic Systems BA at Stanford (possibly the coolest undergrad program in existence). There's a lot of non-mathy (well, some math is involved), non (hard-)sciencey stuff going on that's really interesting out there.

    Best of luck to her. She's at an exciting time in her Life. Help her realize that.

    --
    Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing. -- Wernher von Braun
  114. Spacecraft remote sensing / imaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Absolutely amazing and fascinating work is happening in image processing, such as the extraction of incredible latent detail from vintage images and super-res enhancements from Voyager data (Ted Stryck ftw!) JPL needs you!

  115. less nerdy science careers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    My sister was like that, but she didn't hate math... she just wanted a different way to use it. Now she's a structural engineer (type of civil engineer), and after designing for a few years she now works for a company that does consulting and construction monitoring for big companies like JP Morgan. She flies all over the country (including Hawaii) to monitor new condos and office buildings and things like that, as they are being built, and point out things that need to be corrected or done differently. She spends a lot of time traveling and talking to people as a professional, not "growing mushrooms" in a cubicle, as she used to say. It's a really dynamic and interesting job.

    As a career scientist, I'm not willing to bash an advanced degree, but nor is it the end-all and be-all. A degree isn't worthless in terms of experience or education, and the experience definitely hones you as a person and a life-long learner, but it doesn't always translate to financial rewards. Some people have a hard time coping with that, because it is a big investment of time and sometimes money. It's really important to do something you love. She will find a way to use her talents in some field that she adores. Looking for a less boring field that still focuses on something she doesn't like is the wrong way to look at it. Find what you love, then bring your talents into it....

  116. Home economics by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

    Hopefully I'm not being too harsh. It isn't my point. But... Prepare her to live a life of house wife, receptionist, bank teller, or bag lady. If your niece hasn't learned the importance of using her strengths to create a life for herself she needs to be prepared to be used.

    Didn't Mark Twain (puddin head) say something to the extent of, "If you don't use yourself someone else will. It is one of the few things someone will do for you."

    By the way. I ordered those career choices by pay grade and sexual activity.

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  117. Games as an Art-form by DrYak · · Score: 1

    A good feeling for maths, physics and engineering, and overall general science is quite useful in game design, specially in small teams we're you can't necessarily afford separate writer/art director/etc...

    Making game is definitely a fun way to make use of science.

    Also the gaming industry definitely lacks girls putting a feminine touch to the creations.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  118. Something in defense or finance by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Investment bankers always make huge money - even when they screw up the US tax payers bail them out.

    Defense is about the only US industry left where quant jobs are not being glutting by the incoming flood of guest workers. Try to get a top-secret clearance.

  119. stewarts "letters to a mathematician" by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A degree in math opens the door to many other areas: computer science, any other science, teaching or management. It essentially provides the flexibility and ability to think abstractly. Doing mathematical research is only one option, the actual work can be very applied. A good math education teaches naturally how to understand a complex issue, reduce it to a model which can be solved. Starting with "hard science" makes other areas easier to understand. A good reading for a student pondering the question whether math is an option is Ian Stewart's book "Letters to a young Mathematician".

  120. Why be a teacher? by DoctorTuba · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This seems to me to be rather shortsighted and doesn't really address the question. One of the problems we see in STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) fields is that women who would be good at them tend to eschew them for the obvious nerd reasons. I have a strategy that I use with my students that has had some success. It's certainly not my idea but I have seen it work. What you should help her do is discover uses for STEM that appeal to what research has shown women want in careers - the ability to make a difference at a personal or social level. Sure, teacher qualifies, but so does electrical engineer working on alternative energy technology for developing or areas, or civil engineer working on new construction techniques for building with local materials, or biochemist working on physiological or pharmacological problems in health and disease. You don't have to design chips, or bridges, or bio weapons. And there are probably hundreds, if not thousands, of other career paths like these that she could imagine herself if you support and encourage her. Will it make her time in an undergrad or graduate program any easier? Nope. Still the "boy" culture, still plenty of hard work to do, still many times she'll want to chuck it all. But if she can keep her goal(s) in mind and remember that school is just a short time in the overall scope of her future she can do it. I have examples in my own life of whom I'm very proud so I know it can work.

  121. Design by ghornik · · Score: 1

    She should consider any of the various DESIGN-related professions. Have her contact Prof. John Maeda (Maeda@RISD.edu), who started his career with a degree at M.I.T., after which he became a world-renowned designer, head of a section at The M.I.T. Media Laboratory, and now is President of the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD).

  122. Don't lose another great mind by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    Dear Original Poster:

    Please, I implore you. Do not allow another great mind to be lost to social stigma. Do not allow the next Einstein, Curie, or Salk to throw away a natural talent because she would not be accepted within her chosen peer group.

    I am not saying that anyone should be forced to take a certain path, but to not encourage her to at least pursue math and science a bit more-setting aside the fact that she is a rarity and an inspiration to other young women-would be equally as criminal. Your daughter has no idea what potential fields are open to her, what exciting things can be achieved with the application of mathematics, and she won't know until she gets to the collegiate level. There are dozens of challenging engineering and science careers that are "cool" in and of themselves while requiring a great deal of mathematical aptitude. She should explore as many of them as she can.

    Again, I am all for individuals choosing their own path, but they should make educated decisions based on their individual strengths as well as desires. The pursuit of social acceptance should never be considered foremost in the search for a path for your life. Social acceptance will come when you apply your skills for greater good. Why do you think we know the names of the folks I mentioned above?

    Don't ignore natural talent. Find a way to use it not only for your own enjoyment, but to benefit others. Also, don't put too much weight on a single instrument's evaluation of skill. Not to diminish what a perfect math score on the ACT means for you now and in the near future, but in the long run it means very little. The opportunities achieving that score will present to you should not be ignored or devalued. Explore them and good luck!

    Sincerely,

    - Jason

  123. Children's Medical Researcher by laughingskeptic · · Score: 1

    Ask her questions about what she would like to do. I had a friend in college who had a 4.0 in biochemistry who really wasn't intrested in being a 'scientist' even though it was easy for her. Her plan all along was to become an M.D. that did medical research in the area of children's diseases. You may think this is splitting hairs on the term scientist, but that really was the way she looked at it. She is now doing exactly what she wants as a tenured professor at Duke Medical School, and she just might find the cure to something like childhood lukemia without thinking of herself as a nerdy scientist.

  124. Quiz: What's Your Fame and Fortune? by Isomorph · · Score: 1

    http://web.tickle.com/careers/quizzes/show/1177 At tickle they have some good test that can help your niece identify what she is good at. Let her use a couple of hours there and she will have a pretty good idea of her strong and week sides. Then help her realize her strong sides, but don't force to do things she really don't want to do.

  125. Real Science by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    My (step)daughter had a similar reaction to math and science until she got far enough into college to get involved in some real work. She needed the challenge to make it interesting. Once she got challenged she latched onto it and won't let go. It was easy to see this in our case, she has operated on challenge since her 8 years of Montessori school. She went from there to college, at age 14 (that one was a self-induced challenge; she got herself in and was accepted before we ever found out). Now she looks for trace metals in neural tissue from Alzhiemer's, using the X-ray source at Brookhaven.

    Once you've got some nuts and bolts results in hand, and especially if you're seeing something nobody's ever seen before, IMO science becomes the coolest thing you could possibly do. In the process, math gets yanked into it, and that becomes interesting because it Finally Does Something.

    If the young lady in question responds similarly to challenge, I'm betting what she needs is to get her hands dirty up to the elbows in some real science.
     

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  126. Good Will Hunting by lordsid · · Score: 1

    Make her watch Good Will Hunting. Then maybe she'll move to California to see about a girl.

    --
    IMAGE VERIFICATION IS EVIL!
  127. buckaroo banzai by plopez · · Score: 1

    enough said

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  128. Marketing, PR, Sales, or Forecasting by charnov · · Score: 1

    If she is more extroverted or outwardly creative, she might like Marketing, PR, Sales, or Forecasting. They are mostly people oriented but you need very strong analytical skills to be truly successful.

    Medicine is also a good choice.

    Beware of top sciences schools, though. I scored insanely high and went to Purdue engineering and they managed to kill any love I had for math and science in less than two years. I ended being a graphic designer for five years after I dropped out. I am now back to school for a business degree at 37.

    --
    [RIAA] says its concern is artists. That's true, in just the sense that a cattle rancher is concerned about its cattle.
  129. Design a bra by ztransform · · Score: 1

    Seriously, a lot of astute engineering is required for strap designs and dealing with the various loads and conditions that women's clothes must deal with.

    Or how about high heels? Stilettos that don't break.. you get the idea, women's clothing is an enigma for most men yet more math is required for that than for men's suits.

  130. Actuarial Science by xactuary · · Score: 1
    I suppose it depends on your definition of fun. (We are talking about work/careers here.) But here's an idea:

    Actuarial Science is a great career for a woman and should be considered for anyone gifted in mathematics. The compensation and benefits are very good. I spent my own career in the Employee Benefits arena, but actuaries are also employed by Life/Health Insurers, Property/Casualty Insurers, Unions and Federal, State and Local Governments. Google "Society of Actuaries" for more information.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
  131. Let her do other things please by ZiggyM · · Score: 1

    Science already has plenty of smart people. What we really need it to have science-smart people in other fields, like psychology, sociology, etc, where people cant even do simple statistics or research. Thanks.

  132. Check Out College Websites by emddudley · · Score: 1

    My school has a whole page on the things you can do with a math or statistics degree. I would definately call some of them fun.
    http://www.rit.edu/cos/math/Students/careers.html

  133. Just let her live her life. by FrankBlissett · · Score: 1

    Sorry to say, but just let her have her fun with life. You seem to be trying to live your life through her. I changed my mind a couple times in college and I'm sure she will to. Besides, wouldn't it be better is she were, say, the smartest journalist at her paper or the best mechanic at the shop with numbers? -Frank

  134. generalistic approach by Device666 · · Score: 1

    Extremely gifted people have often more one or two exceptional talents, they excel at almost anything and have a broad interest and a generic approach. A math professor might say it would be a waste not to develop the math talent and many other experts will say exactly the same regarding their field of expertise. To have a talent doesn't mean so much once you so many. Someone has no responsibility to develop one, it has to be someones own desire and choice. The beauty of Interaction Design / User Experience Design is it requires to design and visualise user interfaces while also understanding user needs, business needs and technologies.

    This profession has artistic traits as well as the nerdy traits. Having studied user experience design options are plenty: scientific research, business or art. User Experience Designers /Interaction mostly work in multidiciplinary teams, a great athmosphere to develop social skills as well. Starting your own company also helps to secure you have enough room to broaden your horizon and being surrounded by likeminded people.

    I have done different studies and got my master in interaction design with a A+ GPA. Before I studied I thought I had no artistic talent. Because I had grown up with the expectations of others that I had to do something with my talents I had studied many different studies which didn't had my passion. The idea of discovering my passion the eye opener for me.

  135. Computational linguistics by jpate · · Score: 1

    Yes, I am hawking my own field. But it really is a lot of fun and extremely interdisciplinary. You can do discrete math to your heart's content exploring grammatical formalisms like Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG) and Combinatory Categorial Grammar (CCG) without feeling like you're doing math for the sake of math because you have to explain real linguistic phenomena. When you get a little bored of discrete math, you can move into the statistical domain and work on trying to extract real linguistic insights out of terabytes of naturalistical speech and writing.

  136. Two Things by dcollins · · Score: 1

    I teach college math (usually part-time, at a NYC community college).

    (1) I see a number of people who didn't like math in high school, or were convinced they were bad at it. Then they're pleasantly surprised when they hit "real" college math that it's interesting and intriguing and deep for them. I would recommend that your daughter at least *try* a college math class like statistics or calculus -- she doesn't have to declare a major right away, try it with an eye of making up her mind about what she wants to do.

    (2) I wish someone had told me, at that age, about what I do right now. Primarily I'm pursuing music with my rock band (other friends are artists, etc.). When you're an artist you do need a day job of some sort. If you get a master's degree in math, you can get along pretty well teaching part-time at community colleges, be in an intellectual and not brain-dead environment (like temping our waitressing), and still have gobs of time for your art. I also teach nights, which segues perfectly into a weekend schedule where I'm up all night at clubs and bars, etc. There's lots of demand for remedial math education in colleges these days. At least consider this as an outside option if she wants to be an artist.

    It's not for everyone (or almost anyone), but if I'd known this at her age I would have saved myself ~6 years in the wrong career track.

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
  137. Re:Would have to work for the MRS degree... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

    I'll pass, I have a wife. All the same bitching and nagging, less browbeating.

  138. I got a perfect on the math section too.. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

    ..and now with a CS degree and a crappy job, I realize that the standardized test scores I got did me a disservice. Sure, I got a nice scholarship out of it, but it was an unnecessary boost to my ego, which was soon shattered after college when I found out that without at least a masters from a top level school I'll probably be stuck in wed development for the rest of my career.

    The best advice I can give is don't make a big deal out of the scores, even if it means down-playing them.

  139. Jet Propulsion Lab by rotenberry · · Score: 1

    Before rejecting math, engineering, or science perhaps she should talk to someone who works at JPL:

    http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/

    I certainly enjoyed working there.

  140. Mathies != Cool, why ? by legonis · · Score: 1

    The more important question is why should someone working in math or engineering be portrayed as nerdy and unsociable in the society, while these demographics deserve the most credit for our society's thrive in modern times. This trend, in my opinion, is directly responsible for the distinct lack of desire amid the youngsters in the recent years. Many kids are just way too busy expressing themselves. Look at the engineering/math grad programs, they are by and large comprised by people from other nations (those who are swiftly going for that card: I am an immigrant engineering grad student myself, so put it back in your hand). My role models growing up, were Shannon, Turing, Dijkstra, Feynman, VonNeumann you name it. I was more than stunned to observe that the recent replicas of my heroes, if exist at all, have grown up combating through a deluge of humiliation in high-school, reality-shows, college and so on. Can't this be a huge turn off for someone who might even be remotely interested in pursuing a career in Math et. al ? And that is for doing what they love and being extremely good at it. I can't assimilate the difference between a professional musician and a mathematicians and why the former is applauded to some deity level, while the latter has is badged with the stigma of nerd.

  141. Wall street by rwa2 · · Score: 1

    I hate to say it, but business / economics might be a viable career path for her.

    Our high school co-valedictorians (from a Science & Technology Magnet school, no less) were twin Russian sisters who blew away everyone with their math prowess and did very well on their science classes. They ended up going to Harvard and Yale (so they wouldn't have to compete with each other for class rank) and both ended up taking jobs on Wall Street and pulling in 7-digit salaries.

    Not sure how they're doing now, but I'm sure they've saved enough during the short time over the bubble years to enjoy a nice early retirement and pursue whatever they want now.

    My sister in law, on the other hand, was very strong in math and studied economics in Boston to run off and help some of the poorest countries in the world get on their feet by leveraging microfinance programs. She's been on a few 1-2 year assignments in Uganda and Sierra Leone and really enjoyed it (parasites aside). As a bonus, she probably never has to donate blood ever again.

    Anyway, pursuing economics is probably a worthy and rewarding pursuit for those people who are good at math but turned off to science and engineering for some reason.

  142. My advice... by Panaflex · · Score: 1

    Get her out into the real world a bit, visit some colleges and let her get some experience in different fields.

    We all know people in many different job fields - introduce her and perhaps get a day on the job with some of the fields she's interested in.

    I took two years of college chem before I had my first internship... where I quickly changed my mind.

    --
    I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  143. Re: Score by Tybalt_Capulet · · Score: 1

    I'm good at math and science, and wish to pursue it as a career, but the thing is that my family wants me to go into culinary arts. If I were good with my hands, I would go into construction, but alas, I'm not.

    --
    Has the old saint in his forest not yet heard of it? That God is dead?
  144. Doctor or Lawyer and/or President by evenbetternb · · Score: 1

    Doing well at math could help with learning to be a Lawyer, if she's inclined. If she goes to Harvard, maybe she could be President one day!

  145. We need new rules... by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    The government should step in to provide the proper assurances that people talented in science and math end up pursuing careers to those ends. The new United Socialist States of America will benefit more by ensuring that bright students follow careers that agree with their aptitudes.

  146. Best advice... by msanchez426 · · Score: 1

    First have her to talk to people that do some of the possible jobs in real life. I had good math skills and I was set that I was going to do computing when I was 10, it turned out that after talking to a few people about it, it was not what I thought it was. Eventually, I became a scientist and I'm very happy with it.

    The same happens in the other direction, her idea of science and engineering might not be in touch with reality. Have her talk to some people that actually do science. Give her role models, women in science and engineering would go a long way on removing the image that everything is nerdy about it.

    Next, the best advice I received when I was in high school came from my uncle. Take a major in a field that is wide enough that you can choose later what your career path is going to look like. If she is good she'll continue on to grad school and specialize in whatever she likes once she is more mature to make such a decision.

    Finally, forget MIT she'll be miserable, if she hates a nerd environment it's like sending her to hell. Consider other options, Harvard for instance has a more normal (read not nerdy) group of students still excellent at what they do including science. A more rounded education will serve her well, as long as she does not give up on the skills she does have. A good university will provide internship opportunities in a wide range of things where she can try things out.

    At the end of the day, all you can do is advise, it'll be her decision.

  147. Not (just) Econ by Prison+Rodeo · · Score: 1

    Actually, all the social sciences are great fields for people with good quantitative/analytical skills. Political science is far more technical than most people realize (and every bit as much so as economics), and sociology, psychology, anthropology (physical, not cultural), geography, etc. are all fields in which people with good skill sets will be well-positioned to get ahead. Plus (unlike contemporary economics), those fields are actually interesting...

  148. A cautionary tale - been there, done that. by pomegranatesix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Totally agree with above post. Here's a little cautionary tale for you, from a girl who was pushed into a science major:

    I scored above the 99th percentile on my SAT, ACT, as well as the ASVAB (one of the qualifying tests to join the military.) In fact, I just about maxed out the scores on the ASVAB - my recruiter wanted to photocopy and frame my scores in the recruiting office. I usually scored higher on the verbal sections than math sections on all of the above tests, but I was still in the top few percentiles. Given all that, I thought I was hot shit.

    In high school, I had only had slightly-better-than-average grades because I didn't enjoy doing homework, but I generally did very well on my exams. I took a lot of AP and honors courses in both math/science subjects as well as the liberal arts, and breezed through them. Then when it came to college, I got a full scholarship to a state school. I matriculated as a biochemistry major because 1.) I've always done really well in those related subjects and 2.) my father is a biochemist, and he pushed me to follow in his footsteps. It was not my top-choice college, but I went there because it had good reputation and the scholarship was quite persuasive as well.

    Long story short, I flunked out of college. Miserably. It only took me a semester before I was put on probation, a year to before I lost my scholarship, and then another year before they put me on academic suspension for not making the minimum grades. I hated my major, I hated my courses, and I hated everyone at my school. I didn't even bother attending my classes most of the time. I could rarely be bothered to even leave my room.

    Anyway, I was too afraid to tell my parents that I flunked out of college... so I didn't. Instead, I told them I was doing fine, and became a stripper to pay for an apartment away from home and to attend community college while I figured myself out. Before I became a stripper, I also considered the possibility of running away to another country and suicide - being an academic failure is THAT big of a deal in my family, and I was THAT upset about it. I actually managed to pull this off for a while, until I couldn't take pressure of living a double life anymore.

    I eventually 'fessed up to my parents. I pulled up my grades enough to transfer to another school. Unfortunately, I'm still a biology major for practical reasons - despite me failing so miserably at my last institution, I managed to pass enough courses in my major that my fastest route to graduation is to continue in my major. I am under a lot of parental pressure to graduate as soon as possible - for them, it's a great source of shame and embarrassment amongst our family and friends to have a daughter who didn't graduate college in 4 years.

    Honestly, if I could do it all over again, I wouldn't have even gone to college at all until I was sure of what I wanted to do. I didn't discover my love and talent for physics until just last semester, when I aced my physics course. (Until then, I had always done rather poorly in physics - another reason why I chose biology/chemistry.) If time and money weren't issues, I'd probably pursue a degree in either engineering or physics instead of biochemistry. It's amazing what motivation can do - despite my past track record of laziness, I'm actually doing quite well now. My current school is a lot more academically rigorous than my last one - if I had put in a quarter of the effort that I am putting in now, I probably would've graduated a year early and with honors, no joke.

    I'm not going to lie - being a stripper was probably one of the best and most formative experiences of my until-then overly sheltered life. I learned a lot about myself, about other people, and about the way the world works. It was a better education than I could've gotten at school. It also changed me to WANT to become a better person and to WANT to use my (other) talents to do useful, constructive things. Without all that, even if I had managed to pull up my grades to go back to school to please my parents, I probably would've fallen back into a cycle of avoiding class and failure all over again.

    Moral of the story is, let her do what she likes - for herself, and not to please you or anyone else.

    1. Re:A cautionary tale - been there, done that. by Zarim · · Score: 1

      It's a relief to see that someone else has had a similar experience to my own. I was always pressured into college and to pursue a technical degree. While math and science classes have never been much of a challenge, I've never outwardly enjoyed them and it wasn't until I'd already been in college for a year that I discovered an aptitude and love of art. Now, after four years and nearly failing out, I've managed to avoid the situation by taking a paid internship and am now facing the choice of just finishing school for the sake of being done or going deeper into debt to do something I enjoy.

  149. An Economist or stock market guru by spineboy · · Score: 1

    Lots of physicists work on wall street, using their mathematical talents to predict the market with mathematical models.

    Musicians tend to be good at math, and good at programming, and possibly vise-versa.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  150. Maybe calculator games? by Larryish · · Score: 1

    She can develop a business playing calculator games:

    1: Enter "58008" into a calculator.

    2: Turn the calculator upside down so that it reads "BOOBS" and laugh maniacally.

    3: ???

    4: Profit!

  151. Poker? by pitterpatter · · Score: 1

    Almost 400 comments and no one's mentioned poker, though someone did mention card counting in Vegas. I'm too old to know about age limits. Is that a problem?

    If not, there seems to be a lot of opportunity these days for those who are good at reading people and good with numbers.

    Does everyone in the family avoid playing poker with her? Or is hers a family where she has never played? If she likes it she could do that for a while and then decide what to do next with her life. It might be more poker, might not.

    This might not be the most socially responsible thing she could do with her life, but that wasn't the question, was it?

  152. My daughter is also good with math by reynost · · Score: 1

    My 15 year old is also good with math, but she's academically good all around. She wants to pursue a career as an artist. I'm all for that. Even though she has the aptitude to be an engineer or scientist, that's not what she loves. I'm choosing to guide her into something that she loves to do and then it's her responsibility to find out how to make a living doing it. If she has a passion for it, she'll find a way to do it for life.

  153. Challenge her to this trick Math Question: by bcnstony · · Score: 1

    What is $50,100 x 4?

    The answer is not the more obvious $200,400, but is, in fact, the minimum she will spend at MIT over 4 years. I don't care if she is the smartest person to ever take the ACT, this is a lot of potential debt to burdening her with.

    And yes, I know that MIT has great financial aid, but much of that aid is in the form of Loans, which I don't really consider aid at all, nor will you if you read a popular (if disreputable) website.

  154. tests meticulousness, not brains by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Both the basic SAT and ACT only test up to 10th grade math. Furthermore, many students might accelerate these a year or two and take calculus in high school.

    I never got perfect, but did go to MIT. I figure I was sloppy with a question or two. Someone who is very careful and gets it all right could be a good editor, lawyer, programmer, etc where exact detail is paramount. Then of course the lady might enjoy a career interacting with people more than ideas.

  155. This is absolutely normal. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    She's good at math but doesn't want it as a career. So f*cking what?

    This actually is very normal. I excell at expressive stage dance and Aikido, even though I've only done the latter for about 3 years up to know. I'm good at it probably because I have a diploma and 10 years of experience in performing arts. Yet I didn't choose it as a career. Instead I'm a professional multimedia-designer and a web-developer/flash-actionscript developer since nine years ago. A world class dancer I know earned his tuition by performing and earing bucketloads of money - yet he was studying to become an architect. (Original quote:"I know I'm good at performing, but you should see me as an architect.")

    I recently went to a professionals performance of the type of dance I did. Done by those considered best in this particular field. The performance was so unbelievably crappy and boring, I'm sure I could've done better right of the bat, even though I haven't performed in 9 years. I actually saw technical mistakes on stage instantly. Give me a minimum-wage budget for all performers, and in 2 years I'll have the best crew in the world. I could out-choreograph 90% percent of the people in that area instantly.

    So why didn't I choose a career in performing arts? Well, first of all, if you go performing arts, you do *nothing* else. It's not 9 to 5 it's more like 9 to 12 o'clock in the evening and _paying_ for it the first 5 years. Until you've gotten yourself a reputation and the gigs and sponsorings come rolling in. You have to morph into a person resembling some kind of dictator if you want to successfully shoo a crew of 25 dancers about and the amount of work that goes into a regular 2 and a half hour show is reminiscent of a large complex mission-critical software project. Having a child or even just having fun hanging out with friends other than your dancing crew once in a while is a total deal-breaker in this field.

    Why don't I teach Aikido then? Well, I suppose I could after another year of concentrated training, but I'd need a Dojo and generally would have to think of it as fun even when teaching people the same boring basics every day again even though I'd love to do randoris with experienced Aikidokas that are at my level most of the time. Sorry, but that doesn't sound particulary attractive to me. Screw that as a career.

    I'm not the most outstanding flash/as3 developer right now - the position for which I'm currently hired -, especially when compared to my project manager, but I'm a very experienced senior web expert with solid art, design, software architecture and programming skills and just got a job with a large game developer and come right after my team-lead, AS-skill-wise (And he has a CS degree and has stuck with ActionScript ever since). I'm in heaven right now, with people around me I like, a fun job and superiors that understand what I'm saying and can actually answer my questions if I have any. It's a software developers paradise that more than covers for the below average salary. Which comes to my bank account every month - contrary to that of most professional dancers and Aikidokas. I'll stick with that for now, thank you.

    Bottom line:
    There are bazillions of people who excell in a field and yet pursue no career in it. I know people who could give the best lectures at a campus and have no academic degree at all, because they're just fine working as a gardener, woodworker or traditional german slater. This isn't a problem. Your intention of showing her the upsides of science are good and you should attempt to do that, but don't force the issue if she persists in stearing clear of it, for it actually is quite common.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:This is absolutely normal. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

      Haha, you hicks in flyover territory never fail to amuse me. "I could be a dancer if I wanted" "I could be an architect if I wanted" well guess what buddy you're not good enough, that's why you're not up on that stage under the bright lights.

      You apparently missed the part where I wrote about having performed myself for 10 years (practically the whole 90ies). Fulltime, btw. I even earned a solid salary as a teacher in the field. So I actually do know what I'm talking about.

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  156. Wildlife biology research... or any research! by Bingman · · Score: 1

    No, serious. I'm a wildlife researcher (sort of like the stuff you see on Discovery Channel), and I need math (and computer skills) all the time. Actually, I wish I had a degree in math, because I never seem to know enough.

    So, here you go... an exciting job (try tranquilizing bears for a sport. :) ) and a good place for a math/science talent. And it's definitely not an office job! (at least until you have to sit down and analyze the data).

    In general, I think that any science research is very rewarding for people with a good brain.

    --
    Bing? Bang!
  157. Mod parent informative MUST READ for parents by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Every parent of a high school student should put this on their bathroom wall and ask themselves every morning "Am I this girl's parents."

    If the answer is yes, they need to take a good hard look at themselves.

    I'm glad you found yourself early in life. Some people live decades as miserable adults because they haven't found their calling.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Mod parent informative MUST READ for parents by pomegranatesix · · Score: 1

      I took a job at at car dealership last summer, and one of my managers had asked me my opinion about his 15 year old daughter going to college. I told him my story, albeit slightly more abbreviated, and started crying when I got to the whole part about parental shame. I was mortified about crying in front of my manager...

      The next day, he thanked me. He sat down with his daughter and really discussed her goals and aspirations, and he realized that he had been putting the same kind of pressure on her that my parents put on me. Now he knew first hand how destructive that kind of pressure can be.

      I don't have any regrets, but I still hate that I'm a disappointment to my parents. This whole self-improvement thing is still a work in progress.

      One idea I've seen come up on Slashdot pretty often is the idea that college isn't for everyone - rather, it should be for people who WANT to be there. The fact that there are so many people in college who are only there because, well, that's what you're "supposed to do after you graduate from high school" really does hurt the quality of the education.

      It is absolutely ridiculous that I never attended any of my science classes more than maybe 3 times a semester, and passed them with a C. (It was the electives with the mandatory attendance that killed my GPA.) I understand that there's a curve, but the curve should be NO WHERE near that high. I'm pretty bright, but I'm not that smart. Looking back, I didn't learn a damn thing there.

      At my current institution, I'm competing with a group of very motivated students who WANT to be in school. Yes, it's a lot more work, and yes, I have to put in a lot more effort just to make average grades - but I am learning a lot.

  158. Maths, Science and fun by b1ffster · · Score: 1

    Become a CSI :-) TV makes it look glamorous and everything on TV is real! Isn't it!

  159. Farm & Invent by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    I am extremely good at math and sciences. People are a bit more of a mystery. I used my skills to develop a number of inventions (some of which you may well use). I also farm, raising pastured pigs, sheep, chickens, ducks and geese. It's a great life and my skills at math & science come in very handy giving me a deep understanding of things on the farm including mechanical, biological, chemistry, physics, statistics, etc. I love it. Our kids got my math and science skills plus my wife's people skills. What a deal. Cheers -Walter Sugar Mountain Farm in the mountains of Vermont http://sugarmtnfarm.com/blog/ http://hollygraphicart.com/ http://nonais.org/

  160. OT: your sig by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    Are you a rocket scientist, or a brain surgeon? The neurosurgeons I work with use that exact phrase.

    1. Re:OT: your sig by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Neither, alas. I suck too badly at math to ever make it in the sciences.

      It is a direct quote from my boss, the king of the unintentional malaprop. It was really hard to keep from laughing out loud when he said it. I could hardly wait to get home and change my sig.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
  161. Re: Marketing and posting positions by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

    Your post is Offtopic[sic] and un-Insightful[sic] and relates in no way to the Parent post. You merely posted here because you knew you were more likely to get Mod points.

    The GP, whose post was discussing marketing, was marketing his/her post by posting it near the top.
    So his/her post was positionally on-topic, in a self-referential kind of way.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  162. Computational photography by kevinsullivan · · Score: 1

    Computational photography and video are, at heart, beautifully mathematical--Fourier transforms, lots of geometric linear algebra, etc. See, e.g., Fredo Durand's web pages at MIT. --Kevin Sullivan, University of Virginia

  163. Forget what she likes... by Cruel+Angel · · Score: 1

    ... she's good at math. Let's find a way to make her do math, even though she doesn't like it. Does anyone else find this whole topic offensive?

    --
    Two Rules For Success:
    1) Never tell people everything you know.
    1. Re:Forget what she likes... by mr_gorkajuice · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming everything but the question is sarcastic, and yeah, I agree. The topic is offensive.

      She's good at math, sure, but odds are she's probably good at something else, only you didn't see it in writing on a piece of paper from school.

      I've heard lots of people say that "talent comes with obligations" - if you're really good at something, you should necessarily make the most of it. I couldn't disagree more.
      I'll take the liberty of bragging, since it's relevant - I am something of a multi-talent. Friends and family recognize me as highly intelligent, a jack-of-all-trades, and agree I become good at everything I try out. Does that mean that I *must* become a professional musician, programmer, teacher and journalist, all at once?

      A talent is supposed to be a blessing - something that opens doors for you. Not a curse to dictate your future.
      Odds are that your daughter has other talent that you haven't noticed. Have you listened to how she sings? Seen how she draws? Tried to let her lead a project? Is she good at football?
      First of all, let her do what she wants. Second of all, if you DO wanna guide her, guide her *away* from things your truly think she's bad at (after giving her an honest chance to prove you wrong) - not *towards* the one thing you *know* she's good at, cause she's a human, and there's probably more to her than a math score.

  164. Asia Carrera by tonto1992 · · Score: 1

    She could go the route of Asia Carrera and be a porn star, and just happen to be nerdy to boot!

  165. Actuarial Science by ahow628 · · Score: 1

    I love my job as a Property/Casualty actuarial analyst. It is a nice mix of math and business. I can spend time on my own delving into how to compute complex business problems, or I can dumb down insurance concepts so a group of insurance agents can grasp them. From an education standpoint, you can graduate with a bachelor's and get a job. There is another 3-7 years of exams (which companies fully support with study time and study material) after which you are at approximately Masters to PhD level. Not to mention there are something like 20,000 credentialed Actuaries in the US.

  166. What does she like? by peterrabbid · · Score: 1

    You say that she doesn't really like math or science, so why try to get her to do this? She's obviously very smart, and in that sense will probably be able to succeed in anything she does. Why not ask her what sort of things she's interested in and help her towards her goals? It's important to let her know that she can achieve anything she wants, given her special talents, and that now's the time to start making inroads.

  167. She sounds very smart. by mmwithpeanuts · · Score: 1

    She may want to become an architect, or perhaps to into astrophysics. Another possibility could be not having to use her math skills hardly at all, like most professional people. when was the last time you had to answer a calculus question, because of your job? Hardly, most likely. Let her decide what she really wants and likes, what she knows she can do, and wouldn't mind dedicating many years to the study of in the pursuit of a good profession. You give the hint that she is creative. Perhaps, she can work as a special effects person, or even become a writer, if she's not one already. In other words, she's got lot's of potential. The reasone why I think so is because, if she is this good at something she doesn't even like, most likely she will excell in something she is passionate about, so long as she doesn't happen to chose something she just can't do, like some people who want to be singers, and just can't carry a tune. Have fun!

  168. the pressure goes the other way by r00t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lots of women are being pushed HARD into science
    and engineering. They seem to resist this.

    Is it so hard to believe that different hormones
    might result in different behavior? Why must we
    judge this as a bad thing? Why must we judge the
    value, even the economic value, of a person in
    dollars or euros or whatever?

    Maybe she'd like to stay home. Why can't she?
    There won't be too many bright people in the
    next generation if today's bright people focus
    on for-pay careers. That's how evolution works;
    it'd be good IMHO to resist becoming a world
    full of idiots. Smart people should have kids
    too, not just the dumb ones.

    It's even rewarding. She can homeschool a dozen
    bright kids. Really, it's extremely rewarding
    and it's a full-time job.

  169. A year off by alabandit · · Score: 1

    seriously, stop pressurising her. send her out into the big scarry world and let her have some time to find her feet. get a job or internship an see if she likes it. then go in the film industry, a lot of cutting edge tec

    --
    "You are still innocent until proven guilty. What's changed is what they do to innocent people." by notnAP (846325)
  170. it can work by r00t · · Score: 1

    It gets you on campus. Pick a school with lots
    of engineering students. Spend all your free time
    in the engineering lounge. Marry an engineer.
    Pay off the student loans. :-)

    It's rather practical actually.

  171. one of those is a damn fine choice by r00t · · Score: 1

    house wife

    It requires a husband who respects the job.
    (obviously not you!)

    Smart women produce smart kids generally,
    if they try. Most don't try, which ought
    to terrify anybody who wants the future of
    humanity to include intelligence.

    Raising a big family can be really satisfying.
    After the first few, extras are no big deal.

  172. math talent helps too by r00t · · Score: 1

    The best husband hunting ground is the
    mechanical or electrical engineering department
    of a good school.

    One must survive the classes long enough to
    find a husband. This requires math ability.

    (seriously)

  173. Architect by Lorens · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up . . . architecture should be considered if she likes design and creativity and such . . . what DOES she like? You didn't say . . .

  174. It's her life, her decision. by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

    My brother started out majoring in Math. Found that it was too abstract, and after a semester changed his major to Physics. Physics wasn't 'real' enough, so he switched to pre-med. Pre-med was full of very intense people who couldn't stand to get less than 95%. He switched to biology. One summer he worked in a lab culturing bacteria, so he took his masters in microbiology, and his doctoratal thesis was on some aspect of yeast.

    I started in physics and wildlife management as dual majors and was able to keep it up for two years before schedule conflicts made it impossible. I finished with 1 course shy of a bio minor and 1 course shy of a math minor.

    Unless she has both a huge amount of drive and there is a big pile of money around, don't send her to an ivy league school. There's lots of good schools that are less intense that have good departments in a broad spectrum of subjects. Encourage her to take a bunch of survey courses her first year. As my brother demonstrated, you can change your major 3 times and not lose any time.

    --
    Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
  175. Research a new field by sam_vilain · · Score: 1

    Douglas Adams famously wrote that a Computer Programmer is a Scientist who could never find their field. For me, it was certainly like that - science didn't seem to hold any new and exciting treasures.

    If healing might be their thing, then I'd suggest a career in Acupuncture - the field needs bright minds so that there can be more decent scientific papers like this one. It's a lot different to your average Scientific field - it's very inter-personal, and there is a large degree of "knack" to be learned first while the mechanism continues to be elusive (I give it about 5 years myself before one or two of the key puzzles are unraveled histologically, then the fun will really start). Historically, the most renowned researchers have been accomplished physicians, and there is huge scope for learning complementing skills such as taiji, qigong, tuina massage, herbs... several of which are often combined for a patient.

    Of course you need to find a good school ... preferably offering degrees, in-depth Western Medical training and research opportunities. Please feel free to write to me for recommendations.

    --

  176. 18 year old prognostication ability by bobvious · · Score: 1

    Isn't it crappy that teenagers have to determine what they'll like doing when they're 40, and haven't got enough real life experience to know squat?

  177. I can type well by ragendem · · Score: 1

    but that doesn't mean I want to type for a living. I'd probably do well in a job that can utilize my typing ability but doesn't center on it.

  178. Working With Big Bux by hondo77 · · Score: 1

    I'm in the middle of Warren Buffett's biography. He's a pretty smart guy and a wiz with numbers. Maybe she would like the world of finance? Being a bazillionaire isn't so bad, I hear.

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  179. Maths for Music? Nope. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I studied music to professional standard and I needed very little maths (basic arithmetic should suffice).

    Most of my classmates did not have much of a maths background and they became very proficient musicians.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  180. Baking? by edmicman · · Score: 1

    You have to use math and science to measure ingredients for cooking and baking.....perhaps a good MRS degree?

  181. Technical Art by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    Ever go to Burning Man? Ever check out the San Jose Museum of Art in California? A lot of cutting-edge art requires significant technical abilities. My school, WPI, has a very strong technical art program.

  182. We need brilliant mathematicians to tame M-Theory by Nivag064 · · Score: 1

    M-Theory was devised to overcome the problem that "Quantum Mechanics" & "The General Theory of Relativity" are inconsistent with each other.

    The key concept is that the smallest "thing" is a string, the problems arise as it needs 6 or more space dimensions that are decidedly non-Euclidean. One of the interesting consequences of M-Theory is that it "produces" the graviton without too much effort, and helps explain why there are only 3 families of nuclear particles.

    The mathematics involved is somewhat fiendish, to put it mildly - one needs to be more than "merely" competent!

    I find M-Theory fascinating, but it is totally beyond my mathematical abilities, to understand except at the most superficial level.

  183. Tell her about the "Audit" option by ReedYoung · · Score: 1

    I second the recommendation above of a liberal arts education. And for similar reasons, if this student solicited my opinion, my advice would be to audit classes in as many interesting disciplines as possible, even if they're just barely, vaguely interesting. Until you scratch the surface enough to know what you don't know about econometrics, you don't know enough to assume it's boring. Especially in a university or liberal arts college with a wide selection, you won't know if you like it until you try it, and you can dramatically reduce the risk of getting to your third year, then realizing you don't actually care one way or the other about what you're studying except as a means to a salary. Salaries are nice of course, but it's worth sitting on a few lectures, non-graded, to boost the likelihood that you can enjoy your work as well.

    To the OP, I would just say, take note of the part in bold. No good ever came from unsolicited advice.

    --
    "I can't imagine how things could get any worse!" (some guy) "That could just be failure of imaginatioÂn on your p
  184. Ahh, daughters by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    I liked your post, especially in light of my sig.

    My wife and I are achievers, and we definitely have high expectations for our kids. But the one thing that we make clear to them over and over is that we made mistakes along the road, and we expect them to make mistakes as well. And that they can always come to us for help. And that our intent is always to act in their best interest, even though we will make mistakes from time to time, and even though some of our decisions will be unpopular with them.

    Anyhow, you walk a fine line as a parent. Teenagers are mostly lazy people and need nudging just to get 'em out of bed in the morning. Some parents (like yours) go way overboard. In fact, yours went even farther than overboard by taking your life as a shame upon theirs, and pressuring you for it. Hopefully, in time, you'll be able to heal your relationship with them.

    Good luck!

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock