Slashdot Mirror


Outage Knocks Gmail Offline For Many Users

Many readers noted an outage affecting Google's gmail service last night. Firmafest points to a statement from Google, according to which only a small subset of users were affected. According to reader CaptHarlock, mail itself remained accessible through IMAP clients, and the chat feature via external applications. jw3 asks "Of course, gmail is just one of the many providers of web-based e-mails. When I look around, almost everyone seems to be using them nowadays. So — what do you do? Do you trust that the site of your web-based e-mail provider will never go down? Do you make backups of all your e-mails?" (Some readers still seem to be unable to reach the site, too.)

209 comments

  1. Ma.gnolia! by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Funny

    I never worried about backups. Then I watched this video and now I back up everything. For all I know this "Google" company is a couple seventeen year olds with an old 386sx in their mom's basement. I like their stuff but I can't depend on them to know how to protect my data.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Ma.gnolia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      a couple seventeen year olds with an old 386sx in their mom's basement.

      Close; they recently updated their 386 with a math-coprocessor. Now they can run MAME. :-)

    2. Re:Ma.gnolia! by Arivia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A) You're unfunny.

      B) Stop spamming.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    3. Re:Ma.gnolia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Except that the lesson is really that MySQL gets corrupted fairly easily.

    4. Re:Ma.gnolia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Don't follow that link.

    5. Re:Ma.gnolia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, follow it... It'll be fun!

  2. Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Use Thunderbird with GMail and configure it so that every time there's a new message it is synced to your local hard drive but also left on the server (IMAP probably though I think the same can be done with POP).

    My linux box at home has been doing this for years, I just leave Thunderbird open and set my monitor to sleep after 15 minutes of inactivity. I don't care if my GMail and college mail accounts temporarily go down, it's all mirrored on that machine.

    Anti-Microsoft zealot bonus rant: I stopped using Hotmail when I realized I could not access it outside of Outlook Express ... I'm aware of ways around this but there's a simpler solution: don't use Hotmail. This and the fact that (last I checked) it didn't support forwarding are two very good reasons to move on to a free mail service more dedicated to you. The choice is yours.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      I'm setting this up at home for the family. Do you know if deleted messages in Thunderbird can by sync'd to Google so that only a single delete is needed?

    2. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by dontPanik · · Score: 0

      What? Of course hotmail supports forwarding. How else would I hear about all the 8 year olds with cancer who will only live if I forward this message to 25 people?

      --
      "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers." - Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Of course hotmail supports forwarding. How else would I hear about all the 8 year olds with cancer who will only live if I forward this message to 25 people?

      He meant auto-forwarding of e-mails to another e-mail account so you can access them through POP or IMAP.

    4. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, it's in the server/mail options. It's easy to find.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    5. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      I do this myself. One thing I like though is to pull in other e-mail accounts and have everything just appear in my inbox without having to have Thunderbird open all the time to automatically check. So in addition, my setup uses fetchmail.

    6. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by Elledan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yup, I just use Hotmail for registrations and such which I'm sure may result in spam and other unwanted messages. It's a serious pain to know whether you have got new messages (I don't use MSN), so I hardly use it. GMail's IMAP function on the other hand is perfect. It really elevates this email service from Yet Another Web-Based Email to something that is actually usable and integrates well with my normal work flow.

      Great job, Google.

      --
      Site & blog: http://www.mayaposch.com
    7. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by Admodieus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hotmail now has free POP3 to any client and supports forwarding to any address. It does still lack IMAP though.

      --
      "It's a reverse vampire...they....they crave the sun!"
    8. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Actually, I think what he's wants it to do is delete it but not move it to the trash (delete it permanently which I think means they have to compact the folder it's in). Note: I'm not an expert on IMAP. I don't believe this is possible although I'm not sure why this would be a problem. From that support link it seems that you can only mark it was deleted and it will be deleted when the folder it is in is compacted. However, it adds:

      Shift+Delete deletes the message without copying it to the trash folder, and is also supposed to compact the folder (if you have that preference set). However, some users report that Shift+Delete doesn't always compact the folder.

      That link has something on why what he's asking for isn't possible:

      Remove it immediately

      "Remove it immediately" doesn't actually remove the message despite its name. It just hides it from view and flags the message as deleted. That appears to be because Thunderbird doesn't support the optional UID Expunge command, which requires the server to support the optional UIDPLUS capability. It will be physically deleted when you compact the folder.

      Although that page was last touched on Oct 2008 they may have added that functionality, I'm not sure ... but it may frustrate users to add that feature when the server doesn't support UIDPLUS. Like I said, not an expert though I think this may actually not be possible.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    9. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by vally_manea · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have a different way. I set up a dovecot & fetchmail for GMAIL and I can still access my email online from wherever I go.

    10. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by eldavojohn · · Score: 0

      Hotmail now has free POP3 to any client and supports forwarding to any address. It does still lack IMAP though.

      This is great news! It's good to see that they're very slowly catching up to what other free e-mail providers that started years after them already offer. For a while there, I thought it looked like a case of them trying to extort money from their currently large user base for a functionality that really shouldn't cost money. But maybe it was a smart business move, they did have to make it through the dotcom bust after all.

      I know my mom and sister still use Hotmail--unfortunately for myself (a developer) it's a case of too little too late. My Hotmail address was my first e-mail address and, unfortunately, will be the only e-mail address I've signed up for that has fallen into complete disuse.

      I love when open & honest competition vies for consumer share! It gives me that tingly sensation of things being right for once.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    11. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by Logical+Zebra · · Score: 1

      Hotmail syncs up with the Palm OS. I get my Hotmail account on my Treo.

      --
      I have a bad feeling about this...
    12. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by jonnykelly · · Score: 1

      Microsoft supports Outlook 2003/2007 integration with Hotmail via their "Outlook Connector" plugin. Works fantastically, even synchs calendar data if you are paying them for the calendar features in your "Live" account. It's been around since 2006, and there were earlier incarnations under different names. more info: http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA102218231033.aspx

    13. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by master811 · · Score: 1

      This is more an IMAP/POP public service announcement than a Thunderbird one.

      You could just have easily have used Outlook Express/Windows Mail, Windows Live Mail or even Opera for it. I'm ignoring the full versio of Outlook of course as it's not free like the others.

      To add to your obvious MS bias, you CAN access hotmail outside of Outlook Express as Thunderbird can just as eaily be used with the easy to install webmail/hotmail combo addons for it. Not to mention Outlook and Windows Live Mail as well.

    14. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      What? Of course hotmail supports forwarding. How else would I hear about all the 8 year olds with cancer who will only live if I forward this message to 25 people?

      It's ten people you fool! Now you've just made two and a half cancer-ridden zombies!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    15. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by spyrochaete · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do what you do, but I recently switched from Thunderbird to Windows Live Mail (a free, better Microsoft mail client than the lame Windows Mail which comes with Vista). Thunderbird is an exceptional mail client that does a great job of handling multiple addresses, but the only thing Windows Live Mail does better is that it allows mail to be indexed and searched from the Vista start button.

      BTW I use POP3 but configured Gmail to automatically keep a copy of each mail in its archives. I'm doubly protected this way - if either goes down I can rely on my backup, or I can sync one with the other.

    16. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by DoomHaven · · Score: 1

      I have four big problems with using Hotmail on Thunderbird:

      1) is that it doesn't support Hotmail folders
      2) it doesn't download all my e-mail, and craps with hundreds of messages left on the server
      3) it generates 100s of MB of error messages after a couple weeks of usage that I have to route out and delete
      4) it won't delete files on the server when I delete them in Thunderbird

      So, to me, I can't just as easily use Thunderbird as Outlook Express / Windows Live Mail on Linux.

      --
      "Don't mind me cutting myself on Occam's Razor"
    17. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do sort of the same thing. My Linux box at home runs a fetchmail process periodically, and aggregates email from a dozen different sources. My exposure is only a few minutes, and I've got everything local.

    18. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by xaxa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thunderbird is an exceptional mail client that does a great job of handling multiple addresses, but the only thing Windows Live Mail does better is that it allows mail to be indexed and searched from the Vista start button.

      Why not? If it's because no one has implemented this in Thunderbird yet, fair enough. If it's because the APIs aren't available, then this is precisely the kind of thing the EU told Microsoft they weren't allowed to do.

    19. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by SkyDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Use Thunderbird [mozilla.com] with GMail [mozillazine.org] and configure it so that every time there's a new message it is synced to your local hard drive but also left on the server (IMAP probably though I think the same can be done with POP).

      Stole my thunder you did. Great minds do think alike.I have a similar arrangement, and I use the POP/SMTP settings rather than IMAP. Gmail is my email aggregator, mostly because it's so damn convenient.

      I've never lost sight of the fact that it's a free service, and I can't depend on it for mission critical needs. But as free services go, it's definitely the best out there.

      When cleaning is needed, I just clear out the Gmail inbox in one swoop, knowing that my HD has everything on it. I occasionally use Gmail as an offsite backup for files, or as a way to transfer files between machines. In many wasy, Gmail is something of a Swiss army knife.

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    20. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      I was reading around on the MSDN, and it looks like Windows 7 is already set to provide search handlers for applications that want to use it, so hopefully we'll see a round of upgrades for Firefox and Thunderbird with Win7.

    21. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by harry666t · · Score: 1

      use IMAP, duh

    22. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      Last time I used it, it also send you advertisements from MS/Hotmail that you couldn't mark as spam, couldn't block the send for, and could not otherwise game the system to block. Basically you were being forced to accept spam from your mail provider.

      Also, they'll close your account after a a few months activity, and you have to jump through hoops to get back in.

      So I used my ISP's mail until gmail came along, and I never looked back.

      I should probably setup Thunderbird to mirror my gmail though. Can anyone provide a link to a guide that will ensure I don't download the mail and remove it from the server? I basically want an offline mirror that I never have to think about.

      --

      Question everything

    23. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by spyrochaete · · Score: 1

      I don't know whose fault it is that Thunderbird doesn't take advantage of Vista's native search, but I wouldn't be surprised if the fault was Microsoft's (due to monopoly tactics) or Mozilla's (due to Thunderbird being so stagnant). All I know is that Windows Live Mail is a really fantastic mail client so I don't see any reason to switch back to the ageing Thunderbird.

      By the way, you can use a third-party search solution like Google Desktop or Copernic Desktop to search-enable Thunderbird mail, and Microsoft made it easy to replace Windows Search with a third party product in Vista Service Pack 1.

    24. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by D+Ninja · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You don't even need to use Hotmail for spam anymore. Instead, you can use GMail's (+) feature. So...when signing up on a site, type something like...

      your.email+spam@gmail.com

      Put whatever you want after the + sign. It will still route directly to your inbox. Then, just setup a filter to put anything with "+spam" to the spam folder or the trash or wherever.

      It's a beautiful thing.

    25. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by mrclisdue · · Score: 1

      I just use mutt. Comes with every linux.

      cheers,

    26. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by jonnykelly · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Seems the calendar feature in Live accounts is no longer a fee-for-service.

    27. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by the+white+plague · · Score: 1

      Many years ago I used telnet (and then an except script I hacked into mutt) to access hotmail via raw imap commands. Calendar and folder commands where accessible via (mostly) standard protocol.

      Maybe they explicitly removed support for standards since then, but that's kind of aggressive foolishness seems unlikely. But I've always been surprised by the lengths people will go to in pursuit of fucking idiocy.

    28. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Put whatever you want after the + sign. It will still route directly to your inbox. Then, just setup a filter to put anything with "+spam" to the spam folder or the trash or wherever.

      Yes, that's why when I see an x+y@gmail.com address in my zombie net I just strip off the +y.

      It's a beautiful thing.

      If by beautiful you mean trivial for spammers or anyone else who knows the first thing about google to get around, then yes.

    29. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by RGRistroph · · Score: 1

      I think this is an excellent suggestion. You should not allow import data of yours to not be backed up under your own controll. Keep in mind that if you have sensitive info in your email, there is one more way for it to leak out, of course.

      If you need to preserve "labels" and other structure of the mailbox, look into the script "imapsync". You can set that to run once a night; for speed, you might have it just look at emails newer than 10 days or something. It is available at http://www.linux-france.org/prj/imapsync/

    30. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      All the more reason to use fetchmail. Since it stuffs things into your *nix mailbox, you have your choice of clients: Thunderbird, mutt, Squirrelmail, or all three at the same time. ;)

      And fetchmail also comes with just about every flavor of Linux.

    31. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by Kijori · · Score: 1

      You can also use spam.yourname@gmail.com, which isn't trivial to bypass because lots of gmail usernames already have dots in them.

    32. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by aschran · · Score: 1

      If by beautiful you mean trivial for spammers or anyone else who knows the first thing about google to get around, then yes.

      It's not trivial to get around if you use it properly. Set Gmail to filter anything sent to you@gmail.com to your trash. Then, every time you give out your email address, add a tag (as in you+tag@gmail.com) and allow whitelisted tags through the filter. Voila -- spam-blocking email address tags that are not trivial to get around.

    33. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Just tested that, doesn't seem to work.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    34. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by vux984 · · Score: 1

      So, your going to blacklist you@gmail.com and have all your friends and family use some whitelisted you+tag@gmail.com?

      Sure I guess that would work, but I prefer not to annoy my friends and family with extra tags and funky punctuation. So its simpler to just have a separate gmail account, or a hotmail account... or whatever.

    35. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by aschran · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure I guess that would work, but I prefer not to annoy my friends and family with extra tags and funky punctuation. So its simpler to just have a separate gmail account, or a hotmail account... or whatever.

      It's not like it's particularly complicated to work around that. You could blacklist email sent to you@gmail.com, except for those emails sent from whitelisted family members. Or you could combine the two: have my-private-email@gmail.com unfiltered to use for your friends and family, and only use the tag-filtering method for my-public-email@gmail.com. Mainly I just wanted to point out that Gmail +tags are not useless and "trivial to get around."

    36. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by vertinox · · Score: 1

      If by beautiful you mean trivial for spammers or anyone else who knows the first thing about google to get around, then yes.

      that is why i always use my email address as formated:

      can+you-guess+which_folder+is@my-email.com.myhome.notreally-arealwebpage.com

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    37. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had fetchmail drop messages sometimes. It seems to choke on messages with malformed headers, causing the messages up to that time to be lost. Losing messages is unacceptable to me, so I ended up writing my own utility for grabbing mail off IMAP and POP3 servers.

    38. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by vux984 · · Score: 1

      that is why i always use my email address as formated:

      can+you-guess+which_folder+is@my-email.com.myhome.notreally-arealwebpage.com

      I'm a spammer with a zombie net, I'll eventually try -all- the combinations.

    39. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by F�an�ro · · Score: 2, Informative

      The TO-header can and often will be set to anything by the spammers

      So a lot of the spam that you get which does not contain your email address at all might have been sent to the x+spam@gmail.com alias

      The envelope-to header is the one that cannot be forged, but gmail does not allow you to filter based on it.

    40. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by erikina · · Score: 1

      Doesn't work. Gmail ignores dots though. So eri.kina is the same as erikina. (And gmail will only allow you to register one of them.) But you can filter based on which email address it was sent to (Something I do with slashdot spam).

    41. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by madclicker · · Score: 1

      Try making it work, It is been broken for a few months as Microsoft did the update to their new and shiny Net framework. There might be also a conflict as you will not use a browser and will not get bombarded with advertisement. So not in the interest of Microsoft. Also I strongly disagree with building these heavy email monopolies that will brake in due course most of the mail servers on the net just like Yahoo is doing it lately.

      --
      "History is the realm of the true lie." A.Szerb
    42. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      I just use a domain name.

      So my email address for my slashdot account is 'slashdot @ mydomain.com'
      It has a catchall on it so I have accounts for shacknews, hardocp, anandtech, techreport and god knows what other forums (Iamtrouble etc... oh god she's hot)

      It all gets forwarded to my gmail via zoneedit and then if ever an address is compromised, I can see who sold me out.

    43. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by conan1989 · · Score: 1

      ...Gmail as an offsite backup for files, or as a way to transfer files between machines...

      don't you have a FTP server?

    44. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      It's good to see that they're very slowly catching up to what other free e-mail providers that started years after them already offer.

      well, i don't know any webmail that offers free pop/imap except gmail. do you know any?

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    45. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      you don't have to do any extra configuration. just download the latest thunderbird 3 and choose the gmail imap when it asks you.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    46. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by Finite9 · · Score: 1

      I use imap from Google Gmail and regret it immensely. 10 yrs mail on servers that hold it forever. not paranoid, but "I have nothing to hide" and "why would they want to see what I wrote" arguments are completely empty: You cannot foresee what future trends and policies will do to your privacy. imap on thunderbird still concerns me, because you get weird issues (cannot send mail to linux kernel mailing list for 3 days then it works again) and I have not tested dropping my account, creating a new profile and dropping in all my mail folders from the gmail imap account (yes I store the mails permenantly on my disc, not just on gmail). gmail has the best web interface going, and I love web mail... cannot live without it, but setting up a mail server at home with own domain is too much admin for me and I loose the pretty interface.

      --
      "Everyone knows that vi vi vi is the number of the beast" -- Richard Stallman
    47. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      No, don't use POP. POP downloads the emails and then deletes them from the server: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_Office_Protocol. If you want a backup you'll need to use IMAP. The bonus with IMAP is that the filtering can be server side too so your folders will look the same whether you are logged in from Thunderbird, a web interface etc. Where as with POP since all the emails get deleted from the server you'll see one set of stuff (the stuff not touched through POP yet, and another (the stuff already one your workstation), in short a mess.

    48. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      How is that any improvement to using one email account for normal, and one email account for signing up to things? I mean, surely the point of this filtering method was to avoid the need for using two separate accounts...

    49. Re:Thunderbird Public Service Announcement by aschran · · Score: 1

      It's better because if someone gives away your public email address to spammers, one of two things will be true:
      (a) you know who did it and have the ability to block it, because spam comes to the address with the offender's unique tag, or
      (b) the spam is automatically sent to the trash and you never see it, because it goes to the base email address.

      Personally I only use one email account, but none of these setups is very hard to effect. It really depends how much of a problem spam is for you. With Gmail's excellent spam filtering, it isn't much of one for me, but the +tags can act as a second line of defense.

  3. Or do you do it yourself? by IBBoard · · Score: 1

    Do you trust that the site of your web-based e-mail provider will never go down? Do you make backups of all your e-mails?

    Or do you just not place all of your trust in GMail and do it all yourself? It's more customisable, more unique and more individual, amongst other things.

    1. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by lordandmaker · · Score: 1

      Other things being 'difficult' and 'expensive' presumably.

    2. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by pimpimpim · · Score: 1
      I was there when there was free webspace and free urls by "big names" around 95. I forgot the names(!), but I do remember how I had to fight pop-ups that were introduced along the way, or urls that were impossible to use after a year, because they were not your property. I lost several webpages in cyberspace there.

      So I have now my own, paid, virtual server for my url, pages, my e-mail that are not mailing lists, etc. That is still not the holy grail, though: my virtual server provider, one of the bigger ones in europe, managed to get my server down last month for about 24 hours. At least I could speak someone on the telephone about it who could confirm it, but they were not likely to speed it up, or pay me back for the lost service. (even though it could be fast, just load the virtual images on another batch of machines, and reroute the internal ip traffic).

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    3. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by Nursie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Expensive?

      No. Grab a small box like a linksys nslu2 or a nano-itx board, ADSL with a static IP (I pay an extra £1 permonth for the IP) and a domain name.

      Difficult?

      No, easy! You just need to install linux (pref. debian) set up an MTA like Postfix or exim, make sure to hook it up to a DNSBL or two, maybe spam-assassin for filtering, rDNS and SPF checks, header validation etc, open port 25 incoming on your router, add in dovecot for IMAP, make sure to set up your own trusted root certificates so you can connect in securely, consider a FOSS webmail solution (squirrelmail?), expose port 80 for that, make sure your passwords are good and strong, continually check for and apply security updates...

      I do it. My mailserver runs off an NSLU with a 4GB USB flash stick. I don't think it's for everyone though. Whatever happened to ISPs providing email?

    4. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      Or "as expensive as a basic hosting account" (I could fit all of my email and more on a $5 account with my current host if I wanted) and "as difficult as using the cPanel interface for setting up accounts and the Horde/Squirrel Mail/Cube Mail interface for checking your email (or POP/IMAP through a client)".

      It may not be for every Average Joe, but it's easy and cheap enough for Only-fractionally-above-Average Joe.

    5. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's basically impossible for nearly everyone in the world, and even though most of the rest of us COULD do it, it's so much simpler to just use the one that's already set up. Besides, SquirrelMail's UI is absolutely terrible.

    6. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by lordandmaker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for the cost of a small PC and the effort of configuring a mailserver I could have something to rival a free webmail account. I do it. I know my Gmail account costs me less in terms of money and effort than the Thinkpad that lives on top of the bookshelf.

    7. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know, I was being sarcastic about it being easy.

      Squirrelmail is not something I've ever used in anger, I don't really do webmail. For remote access I either use an ssh tunnel with thunderbird or just ssh in and use alpine from the command line.

      I don't like the idea of trusting your email to a third party with advertising as the major profit driver, and with little to no promises on availability. That said, for most folks I guess it outweighs the hassle of changing email address constantly.

    8. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      They still do, but it hasn't improved like the webmail providers: still only 3-5 accounts of rather small storage often lacking in even basic security features like ssl.

      More importantly, however, it isn't portable. With webmail, you can switch from comcast to verizon to timewarner to bell to whatever without having to tell everyone to please start using the new address.

      If you run your own mail sever, presumably you'd be willing to pay the small fee to point a domain name at it, giving you just as much portability.

      btw, do you have a step-by-step howto on that config starting with, say, a default linux distro (e.g. ubuntu)? Even your description sounds like a lot of steps, that I'm a little unclear as to whether you even can grok them separately or have to understand the entire thing before typing the first command.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do it. My mailserver runs off an NSLU with a 4GB USB flash stick. I don't think it's for everyone though. Whatever happened to ISPs providing email?

      Most of them do. Most of them suck. And when you want to dump your ISP or move, etc. then you have a huge pain in the ass migrating to new email addresses.

      If it bothers you that much, pay for a professionally hosted email service. Or just register your own domain/IP and run your own server internally.

      Personally, I use gmail, a hosted email, and have a private mail server. All my mail accounts are set to auto-forward to my private server, which will only accept connections from IP's on my whitelist.

    10. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by psydeshow · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add a Google Ad Sense float to the Squirrelmail templates... or were you trying to avoid violating a patent?

    11. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I get the portability thing, and it is a big deal for a lot of people. I'm trying to get my mother away from AOL at the moment, the mail address is a big sticking point. (I think there are ways to keep it with aol, but it's a hassle)

      Yes, I do point my own domain name at the server. I've had the name for a while now. You need to point an MX record at the server (A records afre what we use for web. MX for mail)

      OK, step by step...

      Well I used debian but I'm sure Ubuntu would work just as well. Broadly speaking you need -

      1. An MTA (to send and receive mail to other systems)
      2. An IMAP/POP server (get mail from server to client
      3. Anti spam measures and your own "I'm not spam" measures.
      4. Optional extras

      For an MTA you'll want to choose between exim4, postfix, sendmail or qmail. There are probably others. I chose postfix because it's quite light and not too tricky on the config. Sendmail has a reputation for being very complex. The others I don't know much about. apt-get install postfix...

      For an IMAP/POP server I chose dovecot, also because it's light and easy. Can't remember what config I did. Was pretty simple and well documented online. At this point (and with DNS sorted and port 25 forwarded from the router to the server) you're kinda ready to go.

      Anti-spam is where it gets interesting. You have SPF, rDNS and DNSBL(s). SPF is a record you set with the same guys that do your A and MX. It basically says "These addresses are allowed to send mail from my domain", you can find generators for the record online. You may need to mail the registrar to get it set up as the web-admin consoles often won't give you the option. Once in place it allows other admins to check people aren't faking mail from zombies that pretends to be from your domain.

      rDNS is a reverse DNS record so that when someone gets mail from your server they can do a reverse lookup on the IP and match it to the domain name you claim to be sending mail from. Another online record generator and a quick mail to your ISP should be all it takes to get them to set this up, if they're the sort of ISP that will allow that sort of thing. If you don't have rDNS and SPF set up other folks may reject your mail as spam.

      Once you've got those set up you want to set up your MTA to be able to check them so you're protected from incoming spam the same way that you're helping protect others. Postfix required an add-on python process (postfix-policyd-spf-python) to do SPF, it passes the mail to the other program which performs the check and passes it back if OK. Google is your friend to find that. Don't think I ever got around to setting up rDNS checking.

      DNSBLs are places like spamhaus that keep a DNS-style record of known-spamming IP addresses. When a connection comes in you do a lookup of the IP address on there and if there's a hit you drop the connection. Postfix config file can take the address (zen.spamhaus.org) and do this. Spamhaus also provide a way to test it.

      OK, so optional extras...

      I'm an SSL geek so I set up an SSL certificate chain so I can encrypt comms between the server and my client machines. Securely within my own house. Totally unnecessary :)

      I have alpine on the server, which is a rewrite of pine, so I can ssh in to the box and read mail in the terminal. If I want to use a real mail program (thunderbird) outside my own network I use an SSH SOCKS tunnel.

      Err. I dunno if you wanted all that, but I hope it helps, and happy hacking.

    12. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by Viree · · Score: 1

      Why is this rated funny? I would rate you insightful if i have any mod points.

    13. Re:Or do you do it yourself? by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      A small PC? You can get a small PC for $25 or $50 per year? Wow, I need to know where you get your hardware from! As for configuring a mail server, that's the host's job with most accounts. All you need to is log in to a control panel and say "add this address at this domain".

  4. Never go down? by onion2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you trust that the site of your web-based e-mail provider will never go down?

    100% uptime is possible, sure, but you're going to have to pay for it. It'll be horrifically expensive (thousands of dollars a month) because you'll need multiple levels of redunancy across your MTA server(s), web server(s), and connectivity, in two or three locations.

    So, because that's a ridiculous expense for practically everyone, you should just chill out. A morning without your email isn't going to kill you. In fact, it might even be good for you. Take some time out. Go for a walk. Spend a few hours with your wife/kids/friends/dog.

    People are talking about this outage like it was the end of the world. It made the BBC news! I swear the entire world has lost all sense of perspective (except me, natch).

    (I was tempted to make a joke about email services being like girlfriends and how you don't need one that never goes down, but I thought that might be tacky. :) )

    1. Re:Never go down? by Spazztastic · · Score: 1, Insightful

      So, because that's a ridiculous expense for practically everyone, you should just chill out. A morning without your email isn't going to kill you. In fact, it might even be good for you. Take some time out. Go for a walk. Spend a few hours with your wife/kids/friends/dog.

      You're oversimplifying things. Many people rely on Gmail to be their primary source of e-mail for their business. People host their domains on it for their companies. For some people a few hours means money lost. Sure, it's their own fault for relying on "the cloud," but when you get used to a level of service and it suddenly cuts out it can be a major impact.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    2. Re:Never go down? by aclarke · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No, he's not oversimplifying things. If your business relies on email uptime, then rely on a system that will provide/guarantee that.

      I'm sure I'm not the only person here who has worked on systems where an hour of downtime meant many thousands of dollars of lost sales. If being down for 4 hours a month costs you $40,000 in lost sales and $12,000 in lost profits, then be willing to spend $12,000 per month more to get the extra 4 hours per month of uptime. If people rely on a free service without a sufficient SLA for this type of business, then they are being foolish.

      Personally I host my domains' emails through Google. You know what? I didn't even know it was down. And even if I did, I wouldn't have really cared that much. I would have done one of the many many many other things on my to-do list that don't require email access, and would have expected that if a client was trying to reach me that badly during that period, they'd have just picked up the phone and called.

    3. Re:Never go down? by mmkkbb · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google Apps for Domains HAS an uptime guarantee. This may not have been affected by the outage.

      99.9% uptime reliability guarantee

      We guarantee that Google Apps will be available at least 99.9% of the time, so your employees are more productive and so you can worry less about system downtime.*

      --
      -mkb
    4. Re:Never go down? by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>>Many people rely on Gmail to be their primary source of e-mail for their business.

      Yes, and many people rely on local mail exchanges, which in my experience fail at least once a week. ("Sorry cannot send email at this time. Server connection lost.") If Gmail only fails once every five years, it's still a better choice in my opinion than the current locally-provided email service.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Never go down? by slim · · Score: 1

      Did you know that you can pay Google money for Google Apps for Business? $50 per account per year guarantees you 99.9% uptime.

      That said, I bet todays outage for free accounts was less than 0.1% of a year (which would be a tad under 9 hours).

    6. Re:Never go down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but look at the remediation if they fail to meet the uptime - you get some free days of service. That's it. Rather crap of a guarantee.

    7. Re:Never go down? by Karganeth · · Score: 1

      I disagree. 100% uptime is impossible. There will always be some probability of the server and all of it's backups failing. If it was possible to have a server which never went down then backup servers wouldn't be needed. The chance of one server going down in a year might be 10%. Using a backup would reduce that to 1%. Using another backup leads to 0.1% and so on. It's never quite 0%.

    8. Re:Never go down? by aclarke · · Score: 1

      Google Apps for Domains HAS an uptime guarantee. This may not have been affected by the outage.

      That's a good point and maybe I should have been more clear. For reference, here's the Google Apps SLA.

      They will provide you up to 15 days of credit per month if you request it, depending on the downtime. In other words, this is nothing if you are a free user. They're going to provide you 15 days per month of extra free service? Additionally, in my post I mentioned a "sufficient SLA". For instance, if you are losing $3000 per hour in lost profit, then craft an SLA with your provider in which they are liable for $3000 per hour in penalties. Then be prepared to pay for that level of service.

      In the end it should be fairly simple mathematics. Just look at what downtime is costing your organisation, then try to find a service provider that will give you the best price on the guaranteed service that you require.

    9. Re:Never go down? by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      Google App Domains were affected by this. We were unable to access our mail via web at our office. We actually wouldn't have noticed, but we were having a little (unrelated) emergency of our own and had to check mail from home for a change.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    10. Re:Never go down? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      I was just glad not to be bothered by all those werewolves & vampires from facebook :)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    11. Re:Never go down? by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Spend a few hours with your wife/kids/friends/dog.

      For those who's wife's kid's friend doesn't have a dog, you can browse some porn.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    12. Re:Never go down? by jimicus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, but look at the remediation if they fail to meet the uptime - you get some free days of service. That's it. Rather crap of a guarantee.

      I know of no hosted service which will indemnify you for $1,000,000 if they go down for an hour and, by sheer bad luck, that downtime causes you to demonstrably lose a US$1,000,000 order.

    13. Re:Never go down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My account with Google apps, domain ana.it, was affected by the outage. Haven't measured for how long, though.

    14. Re:Never go down? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Many people rely on Gmail to be their primary source of e-mail for their business.

      If that is the case, then they need the thousands of dollars per month solution that the parent referred to. You need multiple physical connections from multiple providers, because you can't get your email if your data connection is bad. You'll also need backup power, since if a car runs into the poll out front none of your PCs will work at all.

      Of course, for most businesses, the loss of email connectivity for a few hours may cost some money but it would still be cheaper than paying all that money for a bulletproof connection. In other words, treat it like a local power outage or snow day... or day after the super bowl. :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    15. Re:Never go down? by SkyDude · · Score: 1

      So, because that's a ridiculous expense for practically everyone, you should just chill out. A morning without your email isn't going to kill you. In fact, it might even be good for you. Take some time out. Go for a walk. Spend a few hours with your wife/kids/friends/dog.

      You must be new here or else an insensitive clod.

      My gawd, two /. cliches in one sentence!!

      --
      == First cross river, then insult alligator.
    16. Re:Never go down? by One+Monkey · · Score: 1

      For a second there I thought that said I could pay for a service in "Google Money".

      My spine is still cold...

      --
      www.nodicerpg.com - Some RP stuff for free, some not so for free, but still cheap.
    17. Re:Never go down? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's a very old "blonde" joke and it goes like this:

      How is a blond like a computer? You don't really appreciate one untill it goes down on you.

      Here's another blonde computer joke:

      How can you tell if a blond has been using your computer? There's whiteout on the screen.

    18. Re:Never go down? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      (I was tempted to make a joke about email services being like girlfriends and how you don't need one that never goes down, but I thought that might be tacky. :) )

      Um, I don't know about you, but my spouse does go down fairly often. Say about twice a week. Now my e-mail provider may have what an hour or two down time through out the year. I don't think that I'd compare the two at all.

    19. Re:Never go down? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "100% uptime" is not the goal. "As close to 100% uptime that is possible (and reasonable)" is the goal.
      And to be technical, 100% uptime isn't impossible, it is improbable. If the server never does actualy fail, then you are getting 100% uptime. Probability of the server failing means nothing unless you are having a quantum mechanics discussion.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    20. Re:Never go down? by whoop · · Score: 1

      0.1% downtime comes to 8.75 hours per year. Fifteen days service for just 9 hours downtime doesn't sound bad for the vast majority of Google users. If you're doing well enough to lose thousands of dollars an hour, you can afford a better agreement.

    21. Re:Never go down? by Myrddin+Wyllt · · Score: 1

      The Google SLA guarantees 99.9% uptime per calendar month, so about 45 minutes outage would trigger it.

      --
      [ ]Half Empty [ ]Half Full [x]Twice as big as it needs to be
    22. Re:Never go down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I get my p0rn via mail, you insensitive clod!

    23. Re:Never go down? by Karganeth · · Score: 1

      I wasn't discussing goals. And yes you're right to think that it's possible to have a server which doesn't go down. However, you know I was referring to the probability of a failure. Also, the probability of a server failing is VERY relevant. "Sir, the server nearly failed yesterday after the temperature of it became extremely high. It couldn't handle the load and the traffic is only going to increase. I would recommend buying a new, faster server." "What the HECK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?! That server has had 100% UPTIME! WHO CARES IF THERE'S A CHANCE IT FAILS?!"

    24. Re:Never go down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people rely on Gmail to be their primary source of e-mail for their business. People host their domains on it for their companies. For some people a few hours means money lost.

      Well, that's the problem right there. They are relying on a free service targeted at an average home user for a business.

      I worked tech support for years at an ISP, and got this type of call all the time. Then they freak out because "OMG we run a BUSINESS on this connection." Aside from pointing out they are violating their subscriber TOS agreement, I would politely let them know that we offer business accounts. Invariably the customer chose to use a home service because it was cheaper.
      This is key. If you want fast response, or to be able to bitch about losing money, etc. be prepared to PAY for that service. Or shut up.

      I believe the standard reply to anyone using gmail for business would be the old office slogan "A lack of planning on your part does NOT constitute an emergency on my part."

      To sum it up, if you rely on email for a business and will lose money when it's down you need to PAY for it. This means maintaining two separate hosted email accounts with two different providers. Or one hosted account for backup and your own mail server.

    25. Re:Never go down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well 99.9% uptime is 365*24*0.001=8.76 hours
      this morning's outage was what? 2 hours?

      they could do it four time a year they would still be within 99.9% uptime

    26. Re:Never go down? by dkf · · Score: 1

      For instance, if you are losing $3000 per hour in lost profit, then craft an SLA with your provider in which they are liable for $3000 per hour in penalties. Then be prepared to pay for that level of service.

      Or use some of that money to buy insurance against downtime. After all, you ultimately cannot prevent shit from ever happening; you can just ensure that when things go wrong the business is not slayed by it.

      There's nothing quite like buying insurance to focus the mind on how much you actually value something...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    27. Re:Never go down? by maxume · · Score: 1

      He is arguing it in the other direction; if 1 hour costs you hundreds of dollars, the Google SLA isn't sufficient (and thus Google's downtime isn't something to be complaining about).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    28. Re:Never go down? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if they would go down two hours, every 3 months, that would still be 99.9% uptime.

  5. Call me stupid.... by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    I know all of you won't hesitate to state the obvious, but I've become sort of reliant on Google Docs.

    I conduct personal business using it. I have PDFs up there that I only back up to DVD.

    Gmail is fine, but if Google Docs had an extended loss of service, I would have to drive 100 miles and go fish out DVDs to restore the docs - and some docs I only have there, and maybe my HD.

    The fact that Google Docs won't let me put my files up there in AXCrypt format bothers me. If there was another online storage company I trusted more, and supported all file types - I would switch.

    1. Re:Call me stupid.... by edmicman · · Score: 1

      You could always pay for hosting, and store your encrypted files on an FTP site, right?

    2. Re:Call me stupid.... by Admodieus · · Score: 1

      Can I ask why you don't keep any sort of local backups? Even if you work on thousands of documents, surely you could download a few of the most recent or important ones to ensure continuity should Google Docs become unavailable?

      --
      "It's a reverse vampire...they....they crave the sun!"
    3. Re:Call me stupid.... by Spazztastic · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could always pay for hosting, and store your encrypted files on an FTP site, right?

      This. $10 a month and I can have an off site backup. $20 a month and I can have TWO off site backups for my personal data, all encrypted using GnuPG/Trucrypt/whatever both on separate continents. Stop using the "GOOGLE IS MY ONLY OPTION" excuse, there's plenty of other ways to back up your data.

      Personally, I use SSHFS and all my files are stored on my home server. Nightly they're archived, encrypted. and shot off to a datacenter in Chicago. It costs me $20 a month for the bandwidth and storage, and it's all encrypted.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    4. Re:Call me stupid.... by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You could always pay for hosting, and store your encrypted files on an FTP site, right?

      This. $10 a month and I can have an off site backup. $20 a month and I can have TWO off site backups for my personal data, all encrypted using GnuPG/Trucrypt/whatever both on separate continents. Stop using the "GOOGLE IS MY ONLY OPTION" excuse, there's plenty of other ways to back up your data.

      Personally, I use SSHFS and all my files are stored on my home server. Nightly they're archived, encrypted. and shot off to a datacenter in Chicago. It costs me $20 a month for the bandwidth and storage, and it's all encrypted.

      I do that with Amazon S3. The data is backed up in two locations (US and Europe). It costs me 0.83 USD last month.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    5. Re:Call me stupid.... by MPAB · · Score: 1

      Back up to USB memory and carry it along. Some of them take less wallet space than a coin.

    6. Re:Call me stupid.... by Grizzled+Old+Scout · · Score: 1

      All hail SSHFS. My all-time favorite remote tool.

      My backup solution: Every couple of weeks I POP my GMail to my local Thunderbird client, then zip/PGP the Inbox file, and upload it to my $6/month Box.net account. Easy as can be and I'm never more than 14 days or so back if I have to restore (note: I don't use GMail for business; if my livelihood depended on it, I'd script the above and do it nightly). Truthfully, my primary concern is less about occasional provider downtime and more about if something happened to my account, not just in the oh-shit-it-was-cracked sense, but what if I were in an accident and in a hospital for x months and my account got disabled, etc. That sort of thing.

      At any rate, GMail is ridiculously easy to back up to local. Yahoo is, too, but its POP/IMAP feature requires (or did) a $20/year premium account. I know little of Hotmail's procedures; like many on this board I use it only for registration, etc.

    7. Re:Call me stupid.... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      My solution is even simpler. I don't have any emails that are so important that losing them would be a show stopper.
      Cost per month - nothing.
      Technical knowledge needed - none.
      How do I sleep at night - soundly.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    8. Re:Call me stupid.... by SixArmedJesus · · Score: 1

      What about using the offline sync option with Google Gears? That way if the online service is down, you still at least have access to your files. I don't know if it will do that with PDFs, or if there is any sort of limit on how many files it keeps synced at a time, but it's just a thought.

      --

      *slight crashing sound*
    9. Re:Call me stupid.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are clearly on the wrong website...what do you use? telegrams?

    10. Re:Call me stupid.... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite.
      No I use email. I just don't rely on it so heavily that if I don't get them it interrupts my life horribly. It really isn't that hard to do. Millions of people do it everyday...
      And no, I am not on the wrong site. I am very interested in technology, however I am not interested in having it run my life completely. Technology is not a panacea.

      Just remember, when the power grid goes down, the Luddites have the advantage.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  6. A bit chilling by Andtalath · · Score: 1

    I do trust Google, but every time they go down I realize I really should backup all my info to some computer.

    This is of course only rational, but still.

    And, yes, I was affected, it was quite annoying.

  7. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does BBC report this before /.?

    1. Re:Anonymous Coward by Vectronic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the BBC (and many others) have thousands of employees, and millions of dollars, and can potentially publish hundreds of stories/articles a second.

      Slashdot, has like 35 employees, and fuck all for money in comparison, and the stories are published in sequence/intervals, rather than as they happen, or even as soon as possible.

      It's been said before, but this is by no means the latest, freshest, most up to date news on the web, frankly I'm surprised it got here as quick as it did (although a few people mentioned it in off-topic comments hours ago)

    2. Re:Anonymous Coward by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because BBC is a news service and slashdot is a news aggregator. Slashdot doesn't "report" anything, they merely provide links to stories and a place to discuss said stories. Until someone else reports on a story, it won't appear on slashdot.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. So which news service reported the /. hate mails?

    4. Re:Anonymous Coward by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Because the BBC (and many others) have thousands of employees, and millions of dollars, and can potentially publish hundreds of stories/articles a second.

      Slashdot, has like 35 employees, and fuck all for money in comparison, and the stories are published in sequence/intervals, rather than as they happen, or even as soon as possible.

      It's been said before, but this is by no means the latest, freshest, most up to date news on the web, frankly I'm surprised it got here as quick as it did (although a few people mentioned it in off-topic comments hours ago)

      We've got thousands of users that submit stories don't we? We need a better way of utilizing those thousands of users in order to pick fresher stories. I'm surprised it hasn't already happened already.

    5. Re:Anonymous Coward by ScottyMcScott · · Score: 0

      I can see it now... "this is Cmdr Taco reporting live..."

    6. Re:Anonymous Coward by dkf · · Score: 1

      Until someone else reports on a story, it won't appear on slashdot.

      Not necessarily, but it helps a submission a lot if it includes a relevant link to a well-written page. Several links (especially where it's not just a dump of what you can get by googling the keywords) is better still. And let's face it, there will probably be somewhere else that writes about it first, even if it is just some obscure blog.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    7. Re:Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is it's like Wikipedia

  8. Monk style: Take backups by inthedump · · Score: 1

    I take backups (email, files, etc) more often than Adrian Monk uses wipes. That way, whether its Gmail or Yahoo Mail, I never lose my important emails.

    --
    nobody remains virgin, life fscks everyone...
  9. I don't know about the rest of you by theaceoffire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I turned on the "Offline Gmail" feature in the lab...

    Did it for the extra speed increase of having all my mail/attachments pre-downloaded, but this also means that I still had access to everything in my account prior to the outage.

    So instead of loosing my email, I just had a delay in getting *new* emails.

    --
    I steal signatures. This one used to be yours.
    1. Re:I don't know about the rest of you by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ^Win.

      Welcome to the new web, where there are solutions for age-old problems like downtime. ;-)

      I was also affected, but it was past my bedtime anyway so I didn't worry too much about it. As long as there's not an extended outage, I'll be fine.

    2. Re:I don't know about the rest of you by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 1
      Grammar Nazi here :-)

      Loose? lose? - please look them up. This grates my poor old mind, much like "should of", instead of "should have", or "I could give a damn, instead of "I couldn't give a damn" - Bah.

      USAGE The word loose is sometimes confused with lose; as a verb loose means unfasten or set free, while lose means cease to have or become unable to find. It is therefore incorrect to say this would cause them to loose 20 percent, the correct version being to lose 20 per cent.

      Sorry :-/

      --
      If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
    3. Re:I don't know about the rest of you by changos · · Score: 1

      Same here, gmail is my personal account so new email can wait.

      Gears is way cool.

    4. Re:I don't know about the rest of you by aclarke · · Score: 1
    5. Re:I don't know about the rest of you by jopsen · · Score: 1

      So did I... and it worked fine... I even wrote an email during the outage... And it was send now that gmail's up again...
      that said I wish GMail had a native client instead... Thunderbird or Evolution just doesn't cut it for me... They remind me way too much of my dad, who uses Outlook...
      Perhaps I ought to write a serious python frontend for GMail... With storage backend, and webmail-like GTK interface...

  10. Web interface is ok now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had trouble getting to the inbox this morning (CET), while logging in worked.
    Now everything seems ok. It's funny i didn't try POP or IMAP because i wrongly assumed that the web interface was ok and the mail subsystem was down.

    It must have been quite widespread, it was reported on radio24 news here in italy.

  11. Good thing Google offers IMAP by trmanco · · Score: 5, Informative

    I always had access to my emails, just:

    Enable IMAP:

    http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=77695

    and configure your email client:

    http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=75726

    No Gmail fail for me...

    1. Re:Good thing Google offers IMAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't get to mine with Imap - you get what you pay for I guess, but for me it was a complete outage.

    2. Re:Good thing Google offers IMAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently this time it was the web front end, so you were OK.

      Maybe next time it'll be the mail servers themselves, then you'll be as farked as everyone else.

    3. Re:Good thing Google offers IMAP by d474 · · Score: 1

      No Gmail fail for me...

      Gfail

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  12. small subset? by imbaczek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    apparently half of europe is a small subset of their users, way to go!

    1. Re:small subset? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You are a whiny little bitch. Did someone get a little sand in their vagina?

    2. Re:small subset? by fprintf · · Score: 1

      It wasn't just Europe either. I tried logging in at 5:45 a.m. Eastern Time and could not get a response.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
  13. gmail "offline" IS your backup by anton_kg · · Score: 1

    Basically, Google Gears plugin uses SQLlite database to store your mail and syncs it automatically. So you can safely use your favourite web interface again.

  14. This isn't really a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether your email is stored locally or remotely, there's always the chance for data loss, but for most people, I suspect that having your email saved on a remote server is way more reliable than having it stored on your local machine will ever be. If you want the best of both worlds, that's really not that hard to do. One trivial way to do this is to set up your primary email account to automatically forward a copy to a secondary email account, preferably with a different service provider. If your primary becomes unavailable, you can log into your secondary. Problem solved. This ain't rocket surgery.

  15. Gears anyone? by Itchyeyes · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of people here complaining about a non-issue. Google offers offline access for Gmail, Google Docs and several other services. Simple go to settings>labs>offline access in Gmail and enable. It's simple and free.

  16. Gmail and Google Gears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, With Gmail there is no excuse to not back up your emails.

    You can use IMAP/POP and Google Gears to backup mail and store emails on your computer.

  17. Who's laughing now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I look around, almost everyone seems to be using them nowadays

    More fool them, then. I certainly don't. Hell I don't even rely on IMAP: I download all my mail via. POP3 to a local mailbox. I don't need to rely on my providers mail server being up in order to read my email.

  18. In related news ... by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... no actual users were harmed during this incident.

    Following the cracking of GMail's Captchas and the amount of spam I've seen with a GMail address, I'm guessing that the only things that were knocked off like were bots.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:In related news ... by teknopurge · · Score: 1

      parent is funny, but should be modded insightful.

    2. Re:In related news ... by Inda · · Score: 1

      I haven't noticed yet.

      If the family have sent me emails, they'll wait.

      If Blockbusters, Ebay, PayPal, My Bank, Slashdot Mods, BBC, subscribed newsletters, and the rest have sent me email, I'm sure it'll wait.

      If a long lost friend has tracked me down and sent me an email, he'll wait.

      If any of the 200 spam vendors have sent me email, they'll get the same long wait as usual.

      Since when did _personal_ email become so important that I need it 24/7? If any one is using gmail for business then they're a fucking donkey.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    3. Re:In related news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *ahem* The ability to forge "from" headers suggests that very little *@gmail.com spam is actually from the Gmail service proper.

  19. Questions... by nicc777 · · Score: 1

    But first an observation - for me IMAP did not work (using my Nokia E61)...

    Now, since my home business can not afford all the fancy and expensive BCM strategies that corporates implement, what alternative is there to GMail that would (a) give me fairly large mailboxes; (b) have a little more redundancy built in?

    PS: In all fairness to Google, even though I currently use them for e-mail for my business I accept I can not expect too much from a free service.

    --
    Need an ISP in South Africa?
    1. Re:Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies like rollernet provide said alternatives for $5/mo. Not for free, though.

  20. Knocks / Gnyquil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else think this story was about a KDE application? (Knocks) Yeah, I called in sick today, and am on Gnyquil.

    Yeah, I'll try and lay off the Gnyquil.

  21. Offline gmail... by mikeage · · Score: 1

    The gmail labs offline option is great, but it doesn't back up all of your mail; only several thousand messages. 95% of the time, that will leave you with what you need offline.

    Of course, it's that remaining 5% of the time...

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  22. Windows Live Mail holds local backup of Hotmail by Brit_in_the_USA · · Score: 1

    I find the windows live mail desktop application does a good job of holding a local copy of my hot mail account. So does my WinMo cell phone (for the last 50 messages).

  23. Of course I make backups by cuby · · Score: 1

    My main computer still uses POP to download everything. In the others I use IMAP.

    --
    Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
  24. Anybody notice an AT&T DSL outage or DNS issue by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    For about an hour last night I couldn't access anybody except Google and a handful of sites, apparently at random. I could ping the DNS servers but could not reach most sites. I restarted the DSL modem, my Netgear router, and my machines - no effect. Came back as suddenly as it disappeared.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  25. Beta Testing by kellyb9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on guys? what do you expect, it's still in beta testing.

    1. Re:Beta Testing by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      I'm curious if any of the paying customers, non-beta, were affected. Not curious enough to RTFA though.

    2. Re:Beta Testing by nicc777 · · Score: 1

      It seems so, as I have one account with an ISP in South Africa that uses the enterprise mail solution from Google. It was down as well, and I noticed my browser was trying to contact mail.google.com (I assume some part of the auth is done on Google it self?).

      --
      Need an ISP in South Africa?
  26. Good uptime, no data loss. by slim · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Do you trust that the site of your web-based e-mail provider will never go down?"

    No, you trust that it'll never go down *for long*, and that when it comes back, your data will still be there.

    Over the years, GMail has had way better uptime than anything I could have constructed myself, and the cost to me has been negligible.

    1. Re:Good uptime, no data loss. by Petrushka · · Score: 1

      No, you trust that it'll never go down *for long*, and that when it comes back, your data will still be there.

      Over the years, GMail has had way better uptime than anything I could have constructed myself, and the cost to me has been negligible.

      Hear hear. It's not just better than anything I could have done, it's also got much better uptime than the e-mail provided by my employer, which is why I collect all my work e-mail to a Gmail address. Knowing what I know of the university IT support, I would need to see many more incidents like this to shake that trust ...

  27. Not an issue by FyberOptic · · Score: 1

    Considering the usually exceptional service they offer, and for free, you can't hardly complain. Everybody has downtime sooner or later. That's why they include that %0.01 chance of it happening.

    Just consider it a two hour break from the computer.

  28. chat still down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since I came in at work this morning, I haven't been able to use google chat. As of now, 10:30 EST, it still appears to be unavailable.

    1. Re:chat still down by teknopurge · · Score: 1

      How much do you pay for google chat access?

      That's right..... ;) I don't know if the parent uses google/yahoo/etc for business, but I can't help but laugh when I hear about people doing business with these type of service providers. I always get some version of "well google has umpteen million servers and can do things better.." Yeah, well if something occurred that crippled any sizable amount of their infrastructure then They Are Doing It Wrong(tm), and continue to do it wrong.

      They have nice services for novelty use - sharing family photos, blogging about how your cat just used the toilet on it's own, etc. - never rely upon them for anything. Those that do rely on these types of ISPs are speaking volumes about their level of general business competence.

    2. Re:chat still down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paying provides you with someone to shout to on the phone when things go down, that's about it.

      Of course is Google going to have better uptime than most paying services.

    3. Re:chat still down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh you read me wrong.

      I don't use google chat to work, quite the opposite :P

      Now I'm stuck actually working...

    4. Re:chat still down by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      I think you're oversimplifying.

      Using a free service for business isn't inherently bad, you just have to do consider the risk. It doesn't always make sense to pay for great service if you can get adequate service for free.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
  29. Gmail backup by evalf · · Score: 1

    This outage prompted me to look for an easy way to backup my mail. I use the webmail interface, and don't necessarily want to put some time into configuring a mail client that I would not use for backup purposes only.

    A google search returned Gmail Backup, apparently designed for the sole purpose of backing up Gmail. I have to wait until I'm home tonight to test it, but I was wondering if by chance some slashdotters would have tested it already. The app seems promissing, but I want to make sure that it's indeed working, as I don't want to find out the backup is crap the day Gmail collapses.

    1. Re:Gmail backup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not just set up a free live/yahoo/whatever account and forward all your gmail stuff there

    2. Re:Gmail backup by Matthew+Bafford · · Score: 1

      It works fine for backup and saves the emails and attachments to .eml format (one per email), so even if the restore functionality fails you'll at least have the emails backed up in a usable format.

      I have not tested the restore yet, since I know at least I can access the emails from the filesystem.

  30. Nice web-based email services... by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...don't go down.

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    1. Re:Nice web-based email services... by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 1

      Since you seem to know so much about it, why don't you start a web based email service. Then attract millions of users worldwide and then guarantee 100% uptime. That should be easy for a nice guy like you. Right?

    2. Re:Nice web-based email services... by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      let me be the first to say.........woosh !

      Sense of humor failure ?

    3. Re:Nice web-based email services... by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      That should be easy for a nice guy like you. Right?

      No. Ask the wife, I go down.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    4. Re:Nice web-based email services... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the joke --> .
      .
      .
      .
      . (this is the whoosh area)
      .
      .
      .
      you --> x

  31. Google Apps for Business. by EddyPearson · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am a business customer of Google's. We use their apps and e-mail package.

    "99.9% Gmail, Google Calendar and Google Talk uptime SLA"

    The service was down for over 45 minutes, how do you think google will react to a refund request? I'm probably not going to make one, but do you think many people are? Has anybody here? How did it go?

    --
    You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
    1. Re:Google Apps for Business. by slim · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's the SLA.

      0.1% of 1 month is ~44 mins. 1% of 1 month is ~7.3 hours.

      So it looks like you're entitled to 3 days of free service. W00T!

    2. Re:Google Apps for Business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      0.1% of time yearly (non leap year) is 8 hours 45 minutes so its ok :)
      Disclaimer: Long time ago in a /. story far far away someone calculated that 99,999% uptime meant 3 minutes downtime for 1 year of uptime

    3. Re:Google Apps for Business. by EddyPearson · · Score: 1

      Ah! So finally I can buy that yacht I always wanted...

      --
      You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
    4. Re:Google Apps for Business. by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      You're going to request a refund for 1.8 minutes?

    5. Re:Google Apps for Business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free service? That's it? Pathetic.

    6. Re:Google Apps for Business. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't get any kind of refund, only extra days of service at the end of your term. Pretty weak SLA.

  32. DropBox for the win by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

    Check out dropbox. It syncs files, built in encryption, platform independent.

    http://www.dropbox.com/

  33. Sorry wrong URL http://www.getdropbox.com/ by blahbooboo · · Score: 1

    Check out dropbox. It syncs files, built in encryption, platform independent.

    http://www.dropbox.com/

    http://www.getdropbox.com/

  34. I think it's been longer than that by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I've been locked out of my gMail account for two weeks, and nothing I do will get it back. Google thinks the account belongs to someone else and that I've hacked into it. You'd think that the fact that I haven't written of opened any emails in it since I started trying to get access back might clue them in.

    Come to think of it, I'd better change my slashdot default email.

    1. Re:I think it's been longer than that by GorillaTest · · Score: 1

      Well, puttin an 's' at the end of email doesn't build confidence...

  35. Why Imap when Pop works Fine by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

    I gave the Imap access a shot with Kmail and although it worked pretty decently, I'm actually happier with the Pop3 access for the simple reason that I've got a local copy of the message on my system. As to whether I want Gmail to delete anything, hell no it's very nice to know that I have copies of all my gmails and can download everything again should I have a system failure on my end.

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    1. Re:Why Imap when Pop works Fine by RGRistroph · · Score: 1

      Imap access can also allow you to keep a local copy of all emails, in fact that's the way it is most often set up.

      I prefer to set up imap, but that's because in my case I control the server, and keeping the mail on the server in one big spool file (which is how most pop servers do it) gets slow and clumsy. Keeping it in Maildir format is better. Of course you can provide pop access regardless of how the mail is stored, with courier or any other modern server. I would immagine that gmail uses custom code written by google to store and index and serve up everything.

  36. This is why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All servers should be running Linux. Unlike NT based systems which throw a Blue Screen when you try to multi-task (proven by the good folks at comp.os.linux.advocacy), Linux will never fail. The server could be on fire with mice inside chewing the wires and it will keep serving data for the next 2 years without any updates.

    1. Re:This is why.... by Myrddin+Wyllt · · Score: 1

      All servers should be running Linux....The server could be on fire with mice inside chewing the wires and it will keep serving data for the next 2 years without any updates.

      That's true for Slackware, certainly; with Ubuntu Server I wouldn't count on more than about 18 months...

      --
      [ ]Half Empty [ ]Half Full [x]Twice as big as it needs to be
  37. Gmail is allowed to go offline. by Crispix · · Score: 1

    Of course they can go offline, and you are wrong to be upset about it. Gmail is:

    1. Free
    2. In Beta

    Even if it were not free and were not in beta, unless you are paying for 100% guaranteed uptime, they are still allowed to go offline. Sure, no one wants to be without email for a few hours, but we'll survive. If it's that important to you, get a paid 100% uptime service with a solid backup plan.

    I'm amazed how people get worked up about short outages like this. Stuff happens.

  38. Blogger by Tronks · · Score: 0

    I don't know whether it's related or not, but I cannot publish comments on Blogger posts today...

  39. Whatever happened to ISPs providing email? by the_rajah · · Score: 1

    They still do it, but it's foolish to use it, IMO. I webmaster for a newsletter that is read by over 1.000 people. We get several changes of email address notes from people moving from DSL to cable, or whatever. Why would you want to go through the hassle of notifying everyone that your email address has changed because you went with a different ISP? Then there are the people that you forgot to notify and the people who forget you've changed... Bah! Get a separate email address like gmail or on your own domain and avoid the hassle.

    Yes, in answer to the question about backing up my gmail, I do. Like some of the other comments, I use Thunderbird. In my case it's Thunderbird Portable running on a 16 Gig Flash drive that I carry with me so I have it at home or at the office. It's further backed up at Midnight each night to a backup server at home and to Carbonite.com. My wife also uses a similar setup, but her Thunderbird runs on the backup server and she only accesses her gmail via the web.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Whatever happened to ISPs providing email? by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      What happened to ISPs providing email? Well, in this case my ISP's email is provided by GMail, so they were probably hit as well.

      Taking your "why not get a separate address" thing a stage further, why not avoid the massed spam of main domains like GMail entirely (I've seen ones CCed to multiple names similar to mine) and get your own domain?

  40. Super-Dull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used a lot of email hosts over the past 15 years - including my own, my employer's exchange servers, small mail providers, ISPs, webmail providers - it goes on and on.

    None of these other providers has been nearly as reliable as Gmail. In fact, I've yet to experience any failure of any kind (despite last night's reported event).

    In summary, I find Gmail to excel in these areas beyond other email providers (webmail or otherwise):

    • features
    • reliability
    • performance
    • availability

    So although some may choose to forgo Google due to this event, I'll stick it out until the competition proves itself better.

  41. Re:Outlook Public Service Announcement by Bearhouse · · Score: 1

    Works fine with other POP/IMAP clients, too ;-)

  42. Comcast forced me to use web mail by oberhaus · · Score: 1
    I had my own mail server set up in my house for at least 8 years, and I was in control of my data/uptime/backups. That all changed when Comcast blocked my incoming port 25. Blocking outgoing port 25 is almost reasonable, but blocking incoming port 25 is just mean.

    Now I am forced to use an external mail service.

    jw3 asks "Of course, gmail is just one of the many providers of web-based e-mails. When I look around, almost everyone seems to be using them nowadays. So â" what do you do? Do you trust that the site of your web-based e-mail provider will never go down? Do you make backups of all your e-mails?"

    1. Re:Comcast forced me to use web mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's as least one provider that offiers a free port 25 redirection service, Roller Network. There are some data transfer limits (it's free, duh) but the paid service to release the limits is damn cheap compared to others once you realize they use a soft limit system.

  43. I followed it and it was fun! Thanks! by Venik · · Score: 2, Funny

    I followed it and it was fun! Thanks!

    1. Re:I followed it and it was fun! Thanks! by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      I followed it in W3M and it was fun.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    2. Re:I followed it and it was fun! Thanks! by j303045 · · Score: 1

      I followed it and it was fun! So much fun, in fact, I decided to include it in the Goodbye Email I'm sending out as a link to my entire organization, under "Here's how to contact me..."

  44. System Availability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    System Availability: Is defined by the amount of unplanned downtime a system experiences. System maintenance doesn't count.

    The calculations are fairly simple. There are about 30 days in every month (30.4 if you want to be more accurate). 30 x 24 x 60 = 43200 minutes.

    43200 min in a month

    95.00% 2160 Min/month 36 Hrs/month
    98.00% 864 Min/month 14.4 Hrs/month
    99.00% 432 Min/month 7.2 Hrs/month
    99.90% 43.2 Min/month 0.72 Hrs/month
    99.99% 4.3 Min/month 0.07 Hrs/month

  45. They're just marketing Gmail Offline by ReadParse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gotta get people using it somehow :)

    1. Re:They're just marketing Gmail Offline by neoviky · · Score: 1

      lol!

  46. Google! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Do you trust that the site of your web-based e-mail provider will never go down?"

    Obviously In the case of GMail, I do trust it. Although Google still calls it Beta allowing them to pull it down at any time and then say "Well.. it's a beta.. it wasn't really for public use..", the mass amount of users using it would cause such bad publicity. It would knock a pretty sizeable portion of the "email network" down..

  47. IMAP is no pancea either by dlinear · · Score: 1

    Every post here is hailing IMAP as the solution, yet I have not received one email on my imap account all morning. I checked gmail.com and all my messages are still waiting for me. The real solution is to lock your email server in a closet and disconnect it from any network. It's the only way to ensure your email is there.

  48. Why the 's'? by GorillaTest · · Score: 1

    I think the real question here is whether or not you should put an 's' at the end of email. Do you put an 's' at the end of mail? Probably not. So what makes email different?

  49. Don't do that by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 2, Informative

    Be careful with this, though, because a lot of places you wouldn't expect don't support the + sign. For example, when I had to renew my SSL cert after the debian ssl debacle, I had a problem: the email I used was me+thawte@gmail.com. Thawte has no problem sending junk email to this address, and they accepted it just fine when I initially accepted the cert, but when I went to renew the it, their system was silently dropping the plus and throwing an error when I tried to confirm the reissue.

    Their technical support was no help either. After talking with some douche called "Jeremy E", he simply informed me that the best he could do was change the address to me.thawte@gmail.com, which of course is equivalent to methawte@gmail.com and not my address. He then did this without waiting for my approval and sent the reissue information to some total stranger (I tried to register it, it was taken). I never did get them to change the address, nor to reissue the cert.

    You would think that a business like SSL certs that charges extortionate (hundreds of dollars) prices for something that an automated system does would have a working email system, but no. I ended up having to buy a new cert from another company.

    By the way, THAWTE AND VERISIGN SUCK

    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.
  50. Email sucks. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Email sucks. I fucking hate it. It is, in my opinion, one of the worst technologies out there. If possible, it really needs to be replaced; I don't know how you'd go about doing that, because it'd have to be an all-or nothing change over (and likely gov't mandated), but I see this as one of the most crucial things for the whole of IT infrastructure.

    The service provider doesn't matter; whether you're doing it yourself on a home server, paying $gazooks per year for a hosted service, or with a free service, they all have major and unpreventable downsides. It's always one (or more of) paying a lot, having to deal with spam and the appropriate filtering, lost mail, and downtime. This is unlike, say, web hosting, which while still facing problems, has significantly fewer and less severe issues.

    Also unlike web services/hosting, email has become essential. It's the primary way that many people communicate professionally, and your email address is largely equivalent to many peoples' identity.

    Is there a solution? Maybe. But I can't see it being workable without global oversight - "Internet 2" type governmental agency oversight, where anonymity is lost.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  51. Out again by simbotula77 · · Score: 1

    Googles out again........EEEP

  52. Gmail Warning! by jaydanie · · Score: 1

    Read this while reading gmail help. It was listed on the side of help text as a warning to gmail users... 2/24/2009 Please be very careful when asked to enter your Google username or password after clicking on links sent to you from Instant Messages. We've seen a number of reports from users who've received links appearing to be from friends that ask them to enter their Google Talk or Gmail username and password into a website called ViddyHo.com. If you have entered your username and password in this way, we are asking you to change your Google Account password and update your security question for account security. To learn how, see our help center article on changing your password. Perhaps these users account have been hijacked?

  53. Slashdotted? by mebrahim · · Score: 1

    Was Gmail Slashdotted?