Slashdot Mirror


Targeted Advertising Coming To Cable TV

The New York Times reports that Cablevision Systems is testing a new project in Brooklyn, the Bronx, and some areas of New Jersey to bring targeted advertising to television audiences. "The technology requires no hardware or installation in a subscriber's home, so viewers may not realize they are seeing ads different from a neighbor's. But during the same show, a 50-something male may see an ad for, say, high-end speakers from Best Buy, while his neighbors with children may see one for a Best Buy video game." The test deployment includes 500,000 households, and separates viewers by demographic data from Experian. "Experian has data on individuals that it collects through public records, registries and other sources. It matches the name and address of the subscriber to what it knows about them, and assigns demographic characteristics to households. (The match is a blind one: advertisers do not know what name and address they are advertising to, Cablevision executives said.)"

171 comments

  1. An end to offensive ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If they can do that then they can take off the ads for phone sex when I complain! I've been watching F1 GPs in Australia at 11pm and had 6 of them in a row.

    1. Re:An end to offensive ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they can do that then they can take off the ads for phone sex when I complain! I've been watching F1 GPs in Australia at 11pm and had 6 of them in a row.

      On the contrary, it appears that they're already running targeted advertising and have you pegged as belonging to the "sad lonely loser" demographic ;-P

    2. Re:An end to offensive ads? by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, now they will know that they need to replace them with the gay phone sex ads.

      Not that there's anything wrong with that.

    3. Re:An end to offensive ads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree. I think ads are objectionable

    4. Re:An end to offensive ads? by InsertWittyNameHere · · Score: 1

      The only porn ads I see with my TV shows are on Pirate Bay.

    5. Re:An end to offensive ads? by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      I'm just waiting for the next thing that can appear when this technology is applied - the commercial break detector that detects that you have a targeted commercial and instead pauses the recording or displays a neutral image.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re:An end to offensive ads? by Jurily · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, it appears that they're already running targeted advertising and have you pegged as belonging to the "sad lonely loser" demographic ;-P

      He didn't say he was watching it alone :)

    7. Re:An end to offensive ads? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Who watches F1 races at all? It's only one step up from Nascar in boringness.

      If I want to have fun, I go drive on the Cart track myself.
      (Ok, the Track that Michael Schumacher drove on is only half an hour from here, so I got an advantage. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    8. Re:An end to offensive ads? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      There are ads on Pirate Bay??

      Must be AdBlock Plus. :)

      I will try to add an exception. They deserve the money.
      Although I would prefer PayPal.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    9. Re:An end to offensive ads? by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      Actually, in this case, they're actionable. Um... nevermind.

  2. OK fine. by gnick · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A little weird, but I'm not really alarmed that this is being used. It (for better or worse) is public data - Taking advantage of it to bore me as little as possible with ads seems perfectly appropriate. Frankly, if I have to watch ads, I'd rather see ads for computer equipment and stuff than for My Little Pony Playhouse...

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    1. Re:OK fine. by Kabuthunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Although this also goes in the opposite direction for some. It mentions that houses with children may see ads targetted towards games and the like.

      So if you have a baby, are you going to be stripped of watching the "funny" advertisements... usually for more adult things like beer, and whatnot... and be forced to sit through baby-food and diaper commercials? I know they're far and few between, but some commercials are actually fun to watch. Why should being in a specific demographic strip you of that fun?

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    2. Re:OK fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the subscriber's TV viewing history provide more useful information for advertisers than a subscriber demographic? If they knew you watched fishing shows then they could bombard you with boating ads 24x7.

    3. Re:OK fine. by American+Terrorist · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Who watches TV without a DVR anymore anyway? It's either DVR or download for me, I can't be fucked to watch a bunch of ads for crap I'm never going to buy.

    4. Re:OK fine. by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Something just occurred to me. You know there's going to be cases where a couple's baby dies, and the cable company's records don't get updated for a while...

    5. Re:OK fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ouch.

    6. Re:OK fine. by geckipede · · Score: 1

      If the data doesn't get updated, somebody is missing an opportunity. Capitalism causing the problem, let the same rabid approach to competition solve it...

      "Need a funeral? Call Graves'R'Us for all your dead child disposal needs! Catering included, low low prices."

    7. Re:OK fine. by von_rick · · Score: 1

      Once the records update after the survey, the couple would be watching ads for assault rifles for the next few months.

      "Did the TV show you ads for baby products after your baby just died? Would you like to blast the crap out of it? Why not try our .xx caliber automatic which fires 200 rounds per second...."

      --

      Face your daemons!

    8. Re:OK fine. by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      You heard how much those things cry?

      You'll still need the beer.

      --
      :x
    9. Re:OK fine. by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      Well good news! You can get rid of that expensive dvr and associated hassle once targeted ads come to your area. Soon you can watch ads for stuff you may actually buy.

      --
      :x
    10. Re:OK fine. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      But they don't need to do anything complicated for that. Fishing equipment companies just need to advertise during fishing shows.

      And they've been using this sort of demographic information for years. The Nielsen ratings track the ages and sex of viewers as well as absolute numbers.

    11. Re:OK fine. by Korin43 · · Score: 1

      Or you could continue to not watch TV, not watch ads, and only buy things you actually want.

    12. Re:OK fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nielsen makes up numbers, and says they tracked some shit.

    13. Re:OK fine. by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except you won't. Experian won't have details about credit card transactions. They'll see "Oh, he buys a lot of stuff at Fry's, so lets send him electronics ads." What they won't realize is that most of those purchases involve either DVDs or capacitors for microphone modding... the occasional hard drive.... For anything more expensive, I'm 100x more likely to buy online, usually at about half the price.

      I'm also likely to spend days or weeks researching purchases ahead of time to zero in on a particular model, so sales on a different model are unlikely to affect my decisions at all on most products.

      They'll see that I buy a lot of food at restaurants, so they'll send me restaurant ads. What they won't see is that it is invariably restaurants within walking distance of my workplace and that I almost never go to restaurants that aren't, which pretty much means five or six very specific restaurants.

      They'll see that I go to Target a lot, so they'll send me Target ads. What they won't see is that I go there to either eat at the Pizza Hut Pan Pizza Express inside (which looks like any other target purchase) or to buy groceries and carry them back to my workplace refrigerator. Once every couple of months, I'll restock on soap, shampoo, toilet paper, paper towels... but otherwise, it's pretty rare that I go to one looking for more general purchases.

      It's just like TiVo's suggestion feature where it sees that I watch a couple of shows that are (IMHO incorrectly) marked as "Kids", and it starts suggesting Barney & Friends. It sees that I watch a couple of shows that are marked "Drama" and "Movie", and it starts picking up black-and-white drama movies from the 1940s.

      Any system like this, if you want it to work well, needs to have dozens of very specific keywords associated with each ad, and needs to have a thumbs-up/thumbs-down feature. It should also allow you to give a thumbs up or down to keywords on a manual basis to adjust the rankings.

      Ideally, they should also do surveys regularly to randomly chosen people and ask them why they gave a thumbs down to a commercial that looked like something they might have reasonably been interested in. That would give additional insight into the sorts of keyword information they should be adding, and would help the system improve.

      Short of that, it is inevitably going to be a joke.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    14. Re:OK fine. by phelix_da_kat · · Score: 1

      I think it depends how that data became public. With the repeated breach of private data being collected illegally or data that becomes public without the consent of the owner... Also how do you change the profile.. as a single male, your viewing habits change.. say when you get married and have kids.. how quickly does the targeted ads change to match your lifestyle..

    15. Re:OK fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and I can't decide if it's creepy that you know what I do or not.

    16. Re:OK fine. by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      I agree. Right now, in Canada at any rate, there is an alarming number of commercials for dog food, kids' vitamins, and Pepto-Bismol that feature amplified sounds of dogs masticating, which I personally find disgusting. Since I don't have kids or a dog, I would be delighted if some technology could direct ads that I find either informative or amusing my way instead of things that I have no interest in (e.g. feminine hygiene products, pregnancy tests, Sham-Wows).

      Oh, and any commercial featuring Billy Mays.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    17. Re:OK fine. by westlake · · Score: 1
      Why should being in a specific demographic strip you of that fun?

      Because advertisers back the shows that reach their target audience. A few more dollars for a new series like "Battlestar Galactica," a few less for an aging "American Idol."

    18. Re:OK fine. by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1
      Why do kid's vitamins ads feature amplified dog mastication? I'd like to have been sitting in on that board meeting...

      "Gentlemen, the data is clear. Our boys have been through it twice and it's no mistake: canine mastication sells vitamins. And the louder the better. We're going to take this ad campaign coast-to-coast. Dogs chewing on every television set across the country, high-volume broadcasts on tv, radio and cinemas. Gentlemen of the board, this is truly a new era in the marketing of nutritional supplement products."

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    19. Re:OK fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're one fucking guy, stop viewing the world as if you were the model for behavior. This fucking site is filled with pricks like you.

    20. Re:OK fine. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I dunno, this is pretty disturbing. If they put targeted ads in cable TV, what's next? Targeted ads in broadcast TV?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    21. Re:OK fine. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you would actually know how to keep your baby from having so much psychological pain or having an helicobacter infection, that it cries all day long, you would not have to drink so much beer that it gets even worse.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    22. Re:OK fine. by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      "This week only, we're having a tufer sale! That's right, two for the price of one!"

    23. Re:OK fine. by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      A My Little Pony Playhouse? The spatial warping technology involved in cramming little ponies into a house and having enough room for anything resembling 'play' is intriguing. Where might I obtain these... 'little ponies'?

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    24. Re:OK fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, great...All I get are depends commercials...

    25. Re:OK fine. by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      That's a lot less polite than I would have put it, but essentially right. They don't need to target you specifically. They don't expect a 100% conversion. They don't expect anything like that, they just want slightly better then they are getting now. Advertisers work on statistics. Well, that and wishful thinking. Oh, and lies, can't forget the lies. Anyways, to get back on topic, for the reasons grandparent mentioned, they don't expect that high of a percentage of people to actually buy their product. They just expect a certain percentage to do so. If this is better than they were getting before, great (from their POV, not mine)! If it is worse, from being so badly targeted, it will go away. But in the end they really only expect to stay even if they do it, because so will their competition, but that's just the nature of business. Personally, I don't care what advertisements I see (for the most part) but more about how much of the show I'm actually trying to see is cut down to put them into it.

    26. Re:OK fine. by buswolley · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the future of television political campaigns.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    27. Re:OK fine. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      things that I have no interest in (e.g. feminine hygiene products

      What, don't you ever have that "Not-so-fresh feeling"?

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    28. Re:OK fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until your TiVo thinks you are gay...

    29. Re:OK fine. by donaldm · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons for getting Foxtel (Australia) was to avoid adverts. Now we get almost the same number of adverts that the free to air channels get. I have found that the best way of watching a show is to record it and then skip through the adverts when you watch the program via your recorder. My HDD recorder can do time shift however you still have to delay watching the program you are interested in by 5 to 10 minutes to be sure you can skip the adverts. Of course this doesn't help if the program you want to watch next is on a different channel. I am aware (we get enough adverts) that I can get a dual channel HD add-on to Foxtel but you have to draw the line somewhere.

      Personally I am thinking of getting rid of Foxtel and just going back to Free to Air TV which is now starting to offer Digital and HD. If I did get a nice dual channel HD HDD DVD recorder (There is some confusion on this in Australia so I am holding off) and a good Digital TV antenna I would be saving money after 10 months. There are some programs I would miss (not that many though) but I can live with that. Now if only I can convince my wife.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    30. Re:OK fine. by uberdilligaff · · Score: 1

      Amen on the Billy Mays. I always change the channel as quick as I can the moment I hear that jerk.

      --
      Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain. --Friederich Schiller
    31. Re:OK fine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEY GUY, THIS IS BILLY MAYS! I THINK YOU JUST HAVEN'T USED ENOUGH OXY-CLEAN!

      OUR SECRET PATENTED FORMULA WILL MAKE YOUR WHITES WHITER, YOUR COLORS MORE COLORFUL AND REMOVE THE ABILITY TO MODULATE THE VOLUME OF YOUR VOICE!

      BUY OXY-CLEAN TODAY!!!!

      (this is the part where my not-so-funny joke is ruined by the ironically name lameness filters, which are in fact lame themselves...)
      (of course caps are like yelling, that's the goddamned point. how much of this crap am i going to have to type before this stupid crap decides the capital-to-lowercase ratio is sufficent???)

    32. Re:OK fine. by evan_arrrr! · · Score: 1

      If you're already going to buy it, why would you need to see an ad for it?

    33. Re:OK fine. by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I think the broken window fallacy applies here. If they're showing extra electronics ads to me, they're reducing the ads for something else that I might actually pay attention to. You are also assuming that my situation is unique. It's not. Most people's interests are not easy to judge from an outside view with few exceptions. And even if they are, most people aren't interested in ads that match their interests. Ultimately, the purpose of an advertisement is to inform a consumer about the existence of a product that they otherwise might not have known existed, but still something related just enough to their area of interest that they might decide to buy it. That is unlikely to occur within an area of significant interest.

      For example, if I were interested in motorcycles (I'm not), do you think I'd be likely to be looking for ads about motorcycles? Probably not. I would probably already own one, and I would probably have a pretty good idea what sorts of cycles I like. Similarly, if I bought computing magazines (used to), am I likely to want to see ads for computer-related products? Probably not. As a programmer, I clearly own a computer, clearly have well-formed opinions about what products I would consider for it, and clearly am likely to be better informed than the average person about those sorts of things. The things are likely to sway me as a consumer are products that I just happen to use or tasks that I happen to perform regularly but have only limited interest in one way or the other. Because there's no buying history for items like that, though, those are the absolute hardest things to target ads for.

      Granted, there are exceptions. In the case of certain specialty products like baby supplies, for example, -if- (and this is a -big- "if") they are able to reasonably guess whether someone is a new parent or not, that would be beneficial. The problem is that it's such a huge "if". If somebody subscribes to a parenting mag, that's not necessarily an indication that they just had a child---the kid might be in the terrible twos. Since itemized product lists are not available to the CC companies, they can't tell whether you are buying diapers or not. The same problems apply pretty much universally to any other indicator you could use. At least there are slight indicators for that, though, even if they're only slightly better than random. Good luck finding a useful indicator to determine whether I would potentially use any particular class of lawn care product or not. (I don't.) Same goes for nearly every product I can think of.

      At best, for a few highly specialized products with a narrow audience, this sort of ad targeting can avoid ads for the person is not likely to be interested in. If you know that the person is over 60, the odds of diaper ads being beneficial are slim. If the person works in software, products from competing companies are not likely to be interesting. And so on. However, in my opinion, with rare exceptions, you aren't likely to do significantly better than the existing method of targeting ads based on the demographic profile of a given TV show, web site, etc. Without a really good feedback path from the user to the content provider, per-person-targeted advertising is likely to have a negligible impact on real-world results.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  3. So, for those of us who... by level99 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Married a chick from Eastern Europe, who is .. cough, 19 years younger than myself. Will we get Viagra or Britney Spears Perfume advertising?

    Oh, the suspense!

    1. Re:So, for those of us who... by Samschnooks · · Score: 1

      Married a chick from Eastern Europe, who is .. cough, 19 years younger than myself.

      You sir, are my hero.

    2. Re:So, for those of us who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      He didn't mention the fact he's 32.

    3. Re:So, for those of us who... by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      Assuming you already know the virtues of Viagra, put the cable account in her name.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    4. Re:So, for those of us who... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 4, Funny

      She'll probably get adverts for applying for citizenship followed by adverts for divorce lawyers.

    5. Re:So, for those of us who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'll get lots of ads for Dateline NBC and Chris Hansen's To Catch A Predator.

    6. Re:So, for those of us who... by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      Well played, sir; wish I had mod points.

      But I hope the OP remembered five simple letters - P - R - E - N - U - P.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    7. Re:So, for those of us who... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Married a chick from Eastern Europe, who is .. cough, 19 years younger than myself. Will we get Viagra or Britney Spears Perfume advertising?

      You sir, are my hero.

      He didn't mention the fact he's 32.

      Which makes the Britney Spears perfume advertising unlikely then. 13 has got to be way past the target age for that stuff...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:So, for those of us who... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So? Why are you against men marrying fertile females? You're a feminist.

    9. Re:So, for those of us who... by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      You'll get lots of ads for Dateline NBC and Chris Hansen's To Catch A Predator.

      You mean like, when Chris Hansen busts his own son?

    10. Re:So, for those of us who... by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Married a chick from Eastern Europe [...] Will we get Viagra or Britney Spears Perfume advertising?

      File systems ;-)

  4. Anyone want to exchange Slingboxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You see my ads, I see yours?

  5. No more tampon comercials by detnyre · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cool... No more tampon commercials at my house...

    1. Re:No more tampon comercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No so fast. Back with Star Trek Next gen was originally airing, that the demographic that wasn't taping and skipping commercials was a result of couples watching the show together. There were lots of changes to the show because of that.

    2. Re:No more tampon comercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Never any girls in your house, then?

      do you *have* to live up to the stereotype so much?

    3. Re:No more tampon comercials by LinkX39 · · Score: 1

      Being the good little /.er I am after reading the summary but not the article I'm not too sure that's the case. The example given in the summary tells me that everyone will still see ads from the same company; it's the contents of the ad that will differ. If a company only produces tampons then you will still see a tampon commercial.

      Again, I have not read the article and I have a lot of lazing around to do this fine Saturday morning so I can't be bothered to do the proper research to know if I'm write or not. That being said, if I'm wrong this will be followed by fifty different responses from people who DID read the article calling me an idiot and correcting me on the issue, ensuring I don't have to read it anyway. THANKS IN ADVANCE!

    4. Re:No more tampon comercials by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      Don't forget the 100 responses you'll get from people correcting your usage of "write" for "right".

      Old grammar Nazis never die, their eyesight just fades away...

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    5. Re:No more tampon comercials by LinkX39 · · Score: 1

      Bah, very embarrassing to someone who actually uses proper punctuation in and spell checks his text messages.....

    6. Re:No more tampon comercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      see post above

    7. Re:No more tampon comercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mebe he's gay. Get over it.

  6. Uhhh... huh. by MWoody · · Score: 1

    So they'll be directing the ads for lovers of painfully loud music to 50-year-olds, while the gaming ads will go to children despite the average gamer being 35. May I suggest a few more surveys before they roll out their new tech?

  7. this could explain the mystery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The time I vegged out in front of the TV watching reruns of Astro Boy and Speed Racer, and all the ads seemed to be for "Hair Club for Men", Milwaukee's Best, and debt consolidation services.

  8. You don't have to target me... by Full+Metal+Jackass · · Score: 1

    ...for the Best Buy video game. I'm pre-ordering that bad-boy!

    1. Re:You don't have to target me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Achievement unlocked: Slick Salesman.

      You sold over 100 deceptive store warranties!

  9. Awesome! CV strikes again! by LearnToSpell · · Score: 4, Funny

    They might have a tough time finding product placement for this household, since the account's in my grandfather's name, and he died in 2003. Maybe some ads for psychics?

  10. This is obnoxious by TheMiddleRoad · · Score: 1

    Slowly and inexorably, the media companies push us away.

  11. Once again it's time to suggest by Travoltus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That we do a DMCA on people's personal information.

    Remove the concept of 'public records' and make it all PRIVATE.

    If Experian wants to collect personal information on you, they should have to pay a fee to you and agree to a standard distribution restriction agreement that makes them come to you for permission to distribute the data elsewhere.

    Now of course credit card companies have to ask and pay you for the right to get that information but they can also charge higher fees, too.

    Violations bring the same penalties as with "pirating" a mp3.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Once again it's time to suggest by adnd74 · · Score: 1

      I agree, I don't think that anything that leads to the loosening of rules that govern the information that Experian holds on all of us is a good idea.

    2. Re:Once again it's time to suggest by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      If Experian wants to collect personal information on you, they should have to pay a fee to you and agree to a standard distribution restriction agreement that makes them come to you for permission to distribute the data elsewhere.

      They aren't collecting it directly but getting the information from other sources. In this case then you should be charging those other sources for originally collecting the information and maybe a smaller fee for Experian to use it. One of the sources they are getting their data from is public records though. Have fun tracking down the original source(s) of the information (could be credit card companies which would make sense since Experian is involved).

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    3. Re:Once again it's time to suggest by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Violations bring the same penalties as with "pirating" a mp3.

      I agree with you and applaud you -- in theory, at least. When it came down to practical matters, it'd never be effective because the average private citizen doesn't have the financial resources to attack a large corporation with a civil lawsuit. More likely what would happen is you'd end up with large corporations being awarded the rights to someone else's life in the form of their personal data.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    4. Re:Once again it's time to suggest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly right. We should be paid for the use of our personal information. Too hard to track? That never stopped now-existing royalty collection entities from processing significant amounts of licensing fees. Apply some technology, it can be done. Needs to be done.

    5. Re:Once again it's time to suggest by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      You got me thinking... A dangerous pastime, I know.

      If you keep a full log of everything you do and what your likes and dislikes are then copyright the journal. So when ever someone uses your personal information you can sue them under the DMCA for copyright violations.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:Once again it's time to suggest by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Maybe we need the equivalent of a union, but instead of fighting for our jobs they fight for things like privacy and civil liberty.

      Well actually, we already have those in stuff like the ACLU and EFF. So it's just really the people who don't bother with those organizations that are to blame. If everyone in America gave $1 to either of them we'd certainly have more power.

  12. Not sure of the value of this. by Telecommando · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm wondering, if Grandma wants to buy a new video game for little Bobby, how is she going to know about any sales in her area? All she's going to get on her TV is commercials for arthritis rub, denture cream, cat food and the like.

    On a related subject, I've also wondered why they target ads to kids anyway. They can't drive, don't have much money and from my experience if I whined and pleaded with my dad to buy me something I saw on TV I generally got sent to my room.

    --
    Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    1. Re:Not sure of the value of this. by Kabuthunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sadly, a lot of parents cave into their child's slightest whims every single time. I've seen brats in the mall that I would have loved to hit with my car for the way they were acting, and the mother is actually APPOLOGIZING to the brat for not buying him the crap sooner.

      It would be the children of THOSE parents (although it applies to situations not quite that extreme as well, I suppose) that all the advertisements you're thinking of are for.

      --
      Planet Zebeth - Metroid with a twist
    2. Re:Not sure of the value of this. by ccguy · · Score: 1

      if I whined and pleaded with my dad to buy me something I saw on TV I generally got sent to my room.

      From what I see, things are different now. Sending a kid to his room is pointless and that's usually his favorite place to start with, plus parents with more money than time or energy tend to spoil kids(*).
      Anyway, even if your dad sent you to your room when you asked him for say, a video game, it doesn't mean that when it was time to actually buy you buy he wouldn't get the one you asked for.
      (*) Not everyone of course.

    3. Re:Not sure of the value of this. by David+Nabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On a related subject, I've also wondered why they target ads to kids anyway. They can't drive, don't have much money and from my experience if I whined and pleaded with my dad to buy me something I saw on TV I generally got sent to my room.

      Are you kidding? Child marketing is a huge industry. Coincidentally, I'm pretty sure Dante reserved one of the lower circles of Hell for child marketers.

      --
      "Her idea of wit is nothing more than an incisive observation humorously phrased and delivered with impeccable timing."
    4. Re:Not sure of the value of this. by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Birthdays, and Christmas. The two days where parents will ask the kids what they want and they will (usually) get it.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    5. Re:Not sure of the value of this. by the_one(2) · · Score: 1

      Fun fact: In Sweden it's illegal to target children with commercials since they are so easily influenced

    6. Re:Not sure of the value of this. by the_one(2) · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Not sure of the value of this. by Nimey · · Score: 1

      No, that's for child molesters and people who talk in the theater.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    8. Re:Not sure of the value of this. by Voyager529 · · Score: 1
      From everything I've read, girls between the ages of 12 and 16 are considered the 'gold mine demographic'. Sure they don't make thousands of dollars each year, but let's say that they make $50 one Saturday babysitting. Where is that going? Mortgage? Groceries? Electric? nope! that's going in her pocket, and she's saving up for a $200 pair of jeans! Kids don't make the money that Donald Trump does, but it's all disposable income, which makes it a marketer's wet dream.

      As for getting sent to your room, apparently you and I (and I'm sure a decent number of slashdotters) had decent parents that taught us how to behave. They even used the wooden spoon! Call the CPA!! A few years in retail proved to me that kids like us who had parents who weren't afraid to discipline are becoming more and more rare. Too many kids get exactly what they want because their parents never figured out how to grow a pair and they're scared that they might hurt the kids feelings. OmGz ThEy MiGhTt HaTe Me11!!!11

      Even apart from the past two points, the third point is that kids haven't quite got the perspective of how to properly view an advertisement. There is no concept of questioning the claims of the ad, or realizing that the intent is to sell the product.

      Ads targeted at kids and young teens work because they have not yet learned the concept of skepticism, so even if the ad doesn't directly sell a product, it has what I call "The Lexus Effect" (although I'm sure there is an official term for it). The Lexus effect goes like this: I'll postulate that most of us here don't own a Lexus. I'll even venture to guess that the majority of us haven't even driven a Lexus. But when we hear the name "Lexus", we immediately consider it to be an expensive, luxury car. In reality, they're spritzed up Toyotas that cost twice the price. While of course selling a Lexus is the ultimate goal of an ad campaign, do you notice how they use a simpler color palette, don't have as many cuts (instead using relatively slow dissolves), have harder lighting, use elegant fonts, and are generally slower paced than a Ford commercial? All of this and more goes into creating an image that we associate with owning a Lexus. Even though most of us will never own a Lexus, the fact that there is a luxury associated with them increases the value to people who *do* decide to purchase one. In the majority of cases, people find value in being able to say "I own a Lexus", and those people will pay twice the price for a Toyota with a Lexus name on it.

    9. Re:Not sure of the value of this. by Monchanger · · Score: 1

      You've made the assumption that advertisers don't know that Grandma buys the occasional video game for Bobby at Christmas. Don't worry- she'll get those ads too- they will just appear at a frequency appropriate to her visits to Gamestop.

      What I wonder is what kind of ads they'll show my MythTv box. I suppose the equivalents of ExtenZe and Internet Millions would by bigger hard drives and air-in-a-can respectively...

    10. Re:Not sure of the value of this. by twostix · · Score: 1

      You're right but I will say in some sort of weak defence of many of those parents, that a lot of parents I know are *terrified* of metting out *any* discipline in public, even a harsh word. Whether it's as pathetic as being worried of being seen as 'uncool' to a greater fear of public scorn or the greatest fear of having the police, social services, child welfare, whoever knocking on the door and invading the home and family. In our current society there's an enormous amount of pressure on this generation of parents to treat children as some sort of ether born angels that can do no wrong and must be molly coddled in everything they do and to have every desire met instantly. Of course the inevitable outcome of humans who are raised that way when they become adolescents is also pinned directly on the parents as a failure. Damned if you do and damned if you don't.

      See to not treat your child as a demi-god is symptomatic of a bad parent, and if your a bad parent, maybe your an abusive parent, maybe emotionally or perhaps even physically. To be safe we had better look into your family more closely, you may be damaging that child.

      There's those of us that are still kicking it old school with our kids, who understand that a child needs absolute love, but also craves thoughtful boundaries and to be told NO as well as yes. That children, *especially* young children need a real honest to goodness mother and father more than they need a 'best friend' in their parents. But as a social construct we're dwindling, and I can see why, current western society doesn't want us. We're seen as relics of the past, useless dinosaurs holding our children back for our own selfish desires.

      Teachers look down on you and eye you with suspicion - your children are a little different, a bit more polite, a bit less selfish, a bit quieter than most of the other kids...well perhaps something's going on in the home (true story). Other parents (many who should know better) tut-tut, and sometimes, just sometimes you even catch yourself doing it to others. It's a powerful thing, the culture to which you belong and can make hypocrites out of the best of us.

      It takes a hell of a lot of courage to bring kids up the way you, me and a thousand generations before us were brought up in the current climate of child worship prevalent in the western world. Many still do openly and take the social hits, many pretend they parent in the 'new ways' in public but in the privacy of their home are more sane and many many more have caved in completely or actually embrace the new way, the 'new way' is a *hell* of a lot easier that's for sure! Just let them do whatever the hell they want. The group you identify could be from either of the last two groups.

      Just an attempt at explanation.

  13. Don't use their boxes by jackb_guppy · · Score: 1

    Unless cable has infinity bandwidth or they place insertion device at each home for each TV, this will not work.

    Now it you pay them for their box, then they have an insertion device in your home.

    Why would you pay them for the right to sell you to an advertiser? Why are you not getting your TV for free then instead of rising rates?

    1. Re:Don't use their boxes by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Once the system goes digital, all subscribers will be identifiable by the MAC address or UID of the cable box. One could argue that ad targeting is one of the primary reasons it's going digital.

      The really bad news is that although many cable boxes are hackable, and the UID can be changed, it would either be a telltale sign to the cable company that the box has been hacked, or you just end up getting someone else's targeted ads.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    2. Re:Don't use their boxes by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is only on digital. And they surely aren't sending a different ad to each subscriber. In all likelihood they're transmitting two to four ads per service.

      Digital cable video bitrates are highly variable. There is no technical impediment to sending out multiple A/V streams on the same service at the same time without increasing the total bandwidth used by the service. Of course, video quality will suffer, but a significant portion of ads are "talking heads" anyway.

      Furthermore, it would be quite possible to monitor bandwidth at the QAM level, and "steal" some bandwidth from other services on the QAM in order to provide more consistent quality during targeted ad breaks.

      The really interesting thing here is that previous systems (that I'm aware of, anyway) have used a software client on the set top to select the ad. This scales. If they're doing this in the headend I don't see how they're going to scale to a significant number of channels with a useful number of demographic groups. Maybe this is only on DSG boxes?

      -Peter

    3. Re:Don't use their boxes by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      You give the industry way too much credit for forward-thinking.

      Every time a cable company takes down an analog channel they can put up twelve digital (SD) channels. That makes operators salivate.

      All other effects of digital (VOD, HD, interactive TV, targeted ads) are things that the operators go along with grudgingly, at best.

      (Of course, I'm speaking about the operators as "institutions". There are many brilliant, forward-thinking people involved, but they're hopelessly outnumbered by maintainers of the status quo.)

      I'm not at all into set top hacking, so maybe I'm missing something obvious. But how do you get provisioned if you have a hacked UID? Is this like "cloning" a set top?

      -Peter

  14. Re:Awesome! CV strikes again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Air fresheners, perhaps?

  15. High-end speakers at Best Buy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only speakers I saw at Best Buy were low-end crap. I would like to see Ms. Clifford's definition of "high-end".

  16. Sounds like a good idea by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why should I watch commercials for tampons, tinned soup, and shampoo? Show me Apple ads, Best Buy ads, trailers to movies I might like, etc.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Sounds like a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Aha! Further proof that goth chicks would rather collect their blood for use in ritual sacrifices!

    2. Re:Sounds like a good idea by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      When ads come on that I don't like, I have a reason to get off the sofa, take a leak, and grab another beer. If they show ads that are interesting for me, I am liable to wet the sofa, and go thirsty.

      testing a new project in Brooklyn, the Bronx, and some areas of New Jersey

      So what ads do they show to Tony Soprano's crew? New concrete overshoes? Brass knuckles half off at Thugs'R'Us?

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Sounds like a good idea by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      What is the point of giving you Apple or Best Buy adds... It sounds like you are already a fan. Trailer to the movies that you might like may work. Why don't you mail the MPPA your taste in movies and they will email you a newsletter weekly for all the movies that fit your demographics.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  17. No more hoveround commercials by twickline · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those hoveround commercials every 30 minutes during the night are such a pain in the butt... I'm not going to buy one for another 30 years so it's waisted advertising. and the commercials suck! So every time one comes on I turn the channel!! And most of the time don't go back to the original channel for hours if not days, so the channel looses out as the "commercial" ran me away. I would like to see ads about crap im interested in... So who knows this might be a good thing?

    1. Re:No more hoveround commercials by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      The targeted ads will have nothing to do with the channel you're watching, so if bad commercials make you turn away, they will now make you turn it off entirely.

      Also, there will be no way to indicate to the cable company that you dislike certain ads, nor would they let you tell them what ads to run even if there were.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    2. Re:No more hoveround commercials by twickline · · Score: 1

      All im saying is im 40 years old, single and no kids in the house. Why should advertisers use the current (out dated) "SHOT GUN" approach? I'm sure others turn the channel when they see stupid commercials. :) Maybe im a nutter but I would fill out a questionnaire give them first hand info... The cable company that is, and then maybe I would see more of what im interested in. And in the end maybe I would be happier and the advertisers would sell me more crap that I don't need. Yes I know, it's time to wake up Alice this isn't wonderland.

    3. Re:No more hoveround commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, they sure are waisted and loosing out a lot.

    4. Re:No more hoveround commercials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should really watch those commercials till the end. There's a great punchline that I'm sure you'll appreciate.

      Apparently, you're very likely to be the one paying for the "too fat to walk" scooter: the company claims to guarantee that either the government will foot the bill or the company will, so I can't imagine that there are many cases where the government (and therefore you) doesn't pay.

  18. Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best Buy and their sister store Magnolia does not sell High End speakers. That's fucked up, don't fool us! Low end Definitive technology and crappy low end Martin Logan don't count as high end in my book. That's like saying Receivers are the best! Fuck off!

  19. Took them long enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They should do this with television so I'm not paying for 3 fucking sports channels, Cartoon Network, 2 Disney channels, 2 VH1s, 2 MTVs, TLC, and the Weather Channel.

    1. Re:Took them long enough by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      You're not. You're paying for the channels you watch. You agree to pay that price for those channels and the cable company is happy to provide the channels you don't want for free.

      If they didn't provide these channels why would they charge you less? They already know how much you're willing to pay.

    2. Re:Took them long enough by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      They should do this with television so I'm not paying for 3 fucking sports channels, Cartoon Network, 2 Disney channels, 2 VH1s, 2 MTVs, TLC, and the Weather Channel.

      No Joke. What strikes me from the Summary: "The technology requires no hardware or installation in a subscriber's home" So they're lying about the technological limitations of a la carte cable channels?

  20. It's bad enough we get ad's on each page of the gu by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    It's bad enough we get ad's on each page of the guide now they want to push more ad on us how about MORE HD wait DIRECT TV HAS MORE HD better guide with mush less ad's and looks good on a HD TV.

  21. Just keep them out of my head by mc1138 · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember that Futurama episode where they beamed the commercial into Fry's dream?

    1. Re:Just keep them out of my head by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      actually, there was no such episode, however Fox did beam a trailer into people's dreams prior to the start of the first season.

  22. Woohoo by popeye44 · · Score: 1

    Finally no ads with sports, douches,beer,tampons,cereal,toys, insert new pill with horrible side effects here, Depends, advice to see my physician if erection lasts more than 4 hours, pamprin, reducing the effects of PMS, domain registration,...

    I could go on all day. the list of things to advertise to me is 1000x shorter than the ads I currently see. In fact I record almost everything that is episodic and skip commercials.

    Now women in underwear jumping on trampolines selling the latest FPS game or RPG I might watch that. I really don't have much use for advertising in general.

    Comcrap is losing me quickly the incredible lack of anything worthwhile being on TV makes the amount I pay to have the DVR and HDTV ridiculous. I do have a few series I watch and they are HD though.

    --
    Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
  23. Shooting the fish in the bucket! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Today, our advertising is so full of lies and deceptions, only if they would tell the truth, then the consumer would be able to choose what they need and not what the advertiser wants the to want and buy.

    Our brains can not tell the difference between fact and fiction. It's our higher cognitive abilities that will reason in hope to find the fact. Advertisements don't give the higher functions a chance to work, subsequently and despite the common knowledge that the ads are just ads, in the long term, we end up thinking what they want us to think.

    Test your self, next time you are in the grocery store, review what you pick and ask yourself why one brand vs the other, then compare ingredients, and see if you have made the better choice. I have talked to many and found that they just picked things that they though were good. I urge you to read the following articles on false memories and see how easy it is to manipulate ones thoughts even memories:

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2001/06/010612065657.htm

    http://www.rense.com/general11/TAWT.HTM

    We have no Cable programing of any kind in our home, our time is ours. We rent movies, talk about thing in life, inter act with our neighbors and read more. It took a year after we cut the cable to realize that we never really benefited from watching general TV programing. Just wasting time, the time that was supposed to compose our lives, hence wasting our lives.

    Good luck.

    1. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Our brains can not tell the difference between fact and fiction. It's our higher cognitive abilities that will reason in hope to find the fact.

      Our higher cognitive abilities aren't part of our brains?

    2. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      despite the common knowledge that the ads are just ads, in the long term, we end up thinking what they want us to think.

      Speak for yourself, you feeble minded clot. I watch a fair amount of TV, and would rather watch 2 episodes of "Lost" rather than any movie that's come out of Hollywood in the last year. "Simpsons" and "South Park" are easily more topical, and funnier, than most so-called comedies. But your point was ads. I watch a lot of commercials, some of which I find informative, and some of which I don't care about. Take groceries - I have the choice of six grocery stores within a 15 minute bike ride. Two of them advertise on TV a lot; the other four, not at all. Where do I go? The store that has the specials that week that I'm interested in. I see a lot of ads for national brands. Do I buy them all the time? Not at all - I buy a number of "no name" or house brand products, because I've tried them and find them satisfactory. On the other hand, I've tried some house brands that I don't like, so I buy the national brand instead (Heinz ketchup is one example). Is it because of ads? No, it's because I tried both, and my taste buds tell me what works better.

      I see a lot of automobile ads. Do they influence me? Yes, to the extent that seeing the vehicle on TV might get me into a dealership to have a look at it, but is my final decision made by TV? Not a chance - I need to evaluate the test drive, the deal, the warranty, operating costs, and, these days, whether the company is likely to survive or not. Ads have zero influence there.

      You might feel TV leads you around by the nose, but those of us made of sterner stuff are fairly able to resist it.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    3. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by servognome · · Score: 1

      Our higher cognitive abilities aren't part of our brains?

      Not after you get married, the wife takes over that job

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    4. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Our higher cognitive abilities aren't part of our brains?

      Not after you get married, the wife takes over that job

      Yeah, no kidding. I'm not even married yet (well, I will be next year) and I'm already feeling the effects. Don't resist, give in to your feelings, let the Dark Side control your actions. Somehow it's just ... easier this way.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I know Slashdot absolutely loves being spoonfed bullshit about how "The Man" is trying to control them, and noone will ever see this anyway, but I'm going to go ahead and say something about this.

      Human beings are influenced by their surroundings. Everything we see, hear, and experiences shapes our thoughts and feelings.

      Naturally, we're also influenced by the thoughts of our fellow human beings. We didn't become successful as a species in spite of this, it's the reason we function the way we do. We learn and grow by absorbing the world around us and sorting it all out. Understandably, these influences can be for better or for worse. The information age has made this far more obvious and important than ever before.

      However, this bit of information seems to horrify some people. They react to it with some variant of "The advertisers are trying to control your mind!" This is true to an extent, as the media pushes at us from all directions with messages such as "Your children are not safe" and "You really do need that fancy new Lexus," as it would be beneficial to them, for one reason or another, that we believe them.

      This raises an important question. At which point do outside influences stop being the way we grow and learn and start being mind control? Hanging out with the guy who sold crack under the bleachers in High School certainly influenced you, but was he trying to control your mind? Likewise, is a Lysol commercial really all that bad? The medium of transmission doesn't seem to make much difference here, and neither does the message.

      In the end, what matters is our ability to filter information. You really CAN choose which influences you will allow to affect you and the ones that you will ignore. Yet this doesn't appear to be common knowledge.

      Perhaps it's the fallacy of "Everyone else is just a mass of sheeple, I'm the only one who thinks for herself!" or it could simply be that we are virgins to this new, information driven world and we simply need more time to adapt.

    6. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I see a lot of automobile ads. Do they influence me? Yes, to the extent that seeing the vehicle on TV might get me into a dealership to have a look at it, but is my final decision made by TV? Not a chance - I need to evaluate the test drive, the deal, the warranty, operating costs, and, these days, whether the company is likely to survive or not. Ads have zero influence there.

      The fact that they got you to go to the dealership to "have a look" means the ad worked on you. Remember, one of the goals of advertising to convice the consumer to buy something while maintaining the illusion that they choose to buy it of their own free will the entire time. Don't be so naive ao to assume that you are immune to it.

    7. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should have been more clear, yes, but it's our ability to think and the use of logic that drives us to the truth. As you well know, the truth itself is quite elusive, which explains our overall ability to reason.

      See this article:
      http://www.sharpbrains.com/blog/2006/12/18/what-are-cognitive-abilities/

      Thanks

    8. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by Brickwall · · Score: 1
      "Having a look" != "buying". Ads are designed to make you buy something. I'm only in the market for a car once every ten years or so; when I am, I start paying attention to ads, looking for what I want. Last time, I had two pre-schoolers, so I started looking at minivans. I didn't even know that Mazda made a minivan, but when I saw a TV commercial for one, I ended up at the dealer. In the end, it turned out to be more expensive and smaller than the Chrysler we eventually bought (and were quite happy with). Sounds like an exercise of free will to me.

      Now, it's time for another vehicle, and I'm actually looking at a gas powered scooter, but there are no TV ads for either dealers or models. This means I'm spending a lot more time searching out dealers on the Internet, finding out where they are, making the trek, checking out features and prices, etc. It's a lot more work. TV and newspaper ads help me narrow my search quickly and easily. If you're implying I'm not "immune" to this convenience, I'll concede your point. But if you think some ad is going to get me to buy a pickup truck, think again. Don't need one, don't want one, ain't never gonna get one. Most sporting events I watch on TV are full of ads for pickups and beer; not interested in either, so I think I'm totally immune to the ads.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    9. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good points and no insults was intended, however, the conversation is much more complex than what you and I have proposed here.

      Yes there are those who are some what immune to the power of suggestion; even repeated. I am aware of some of my limitations, or so I think, but judging by your reply, I can say products, be it a movie or ketchup, I personally like to see what it's made of. Movie, the story line and screen play as well as who directed it are important to me, but to my wife, the players are of big importance. In case of ketchup, or food items, I really recommend reading the ingredients; its your health and life you are effecting. In short, I say "Cigarettes" in early movie years, say Casablanca years, tobacco companies subsidized the movies heavily, with out anyone knowing that the movie maker was paid to get the actor or actress take a drag from that cigarette in such sexy manor; and in result we have the obvious smoking issue in our society. Yes many people never got started smoking, but the facts on the ground are proof enough.

      And your comment about being a "feeble minded clot", :-) you may be right, but I go by proven true unbiased studies that are done. ie: Stanford University did a little study on our brain power to decide. They got 2 groups, one to remember a 1 digit number and the other a 7 digit number, and simply were asked to buy ether a fruit salad or a chocolate cake! Well the 7 group got the cake! These types of studies point to the fact that our brain is really not that powerful, we tend to loose reasoning power with such small and simple test! Now imagine what is this information overflow is doing to us as a society...

      Ever buy anything you really didn't need?

      P.S. Non the less, I miss Simpsons!!! :-)

    10. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for your reply, and I did read it... :-)

      In general, I am in agreement with you, we are sum of our life experiences; however, I didn't mean to imply that the advertisers are trying to control you mind, but to sell you something you may not even need! Ever buy something you didn't need? You can choose, but when overwhelmed with information, one can loose site of logic and reason. What I am trying to say here, let's put a little, hell, just the truth in what we advertise... Your reply expresses your inelegance, and I know you can choose. But let's just stay to the truth.

      I mentioned this earlier in an other reply but it's real:

      Take Movies, in early movie years, say Casablanca years, even now, tobacco companies subsidized the movies heavily, with out anyone knowing that the movie maker was paid to get the actor or actress take a drag from that cigarette in such sexy manor; and in result we have the obvious smoking issue in our society. Yes many people never got started smoking, but the facts on the ground are proof enough.

      Also:
      Stanford University did a little study on our brain power to decide. They got 2 groups, one to remember a 1 digit number and the other a 7 digit number, and simply were asked to buy ether a fruit salad or a chocolate cake! Well the 7 group got the cake! These types of studies point to the fact that our brain is really not that powerful, we tend to loose reasoning power with such small and simple test! Now imagine what is this information overflow is doing to us as a society... Having said that, I know people who are unaffected, but there are those who are.

      Other studies showed that people who are effected tend to me more sympathetic, and those who are not, tend to be more apathetic! More apathetic people tend to be more successful in higher business positions and in political positions. I see that pattern, clearly!

      Making people think things is easier than we all think.

      I enjoyed reading your reply
      Take care... :-)

      Suggested readings:
      See: The battle between emotion and reason in your brain:
      http://www.ethicurean.com/2009/01/08/radiolab/

      http://depts.washington.edu/uweek/archives/2001.07.JUL_05/_article5.html

      http://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/news/article/5191

    11. Re:Shooting the fish in the bucket! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I disagree about the "Ads are designed to make you buy something". A lot of ads are designed to for what the industry calls "branding". In other words, when you think of an item, they want you to think of their product. Using your example of pickup trucks, you may not want now, or ever for that matter. But say you do decide you need one, I bet the first three things you'd think of would be "Ford", "Chevy", and "Dodge", which would be a direct result of all the advertising you've seen for those brands over the years. You'd probably be less likely to think "Mazda", "Nissan", or "Honda" even though they all make pickup trucks too (well, I'm assuming that Mazda still makes the B-series here). I'm not saying you'd be this way, but this association is so strong that many pickup truck buyers don't even consider anything other than the big three when it comes time to buy a truck. This is really their goal, as even marketers realize that you're unlikely to buy a truck just because they show you a thirty second clip of it driving around in the desert or something.

      This form of advertising is actually very common, and companies spend a lot of money on it. Other examples include Coca-Cola (everyone knows what Coke is, the ads they run are primarly to keep the brand fresh in your mind), any other product/brand that everyone already knows about (McDonalds, Nike, Dell, Walmart, Playstation, iPod, countless others), and also all those obnoxious pill ads (you obviously aren't ever going to buy heartburn medicine if you don't have heartburn, but if you do start having problems with it, they want you to immediately think Nexium or whatever the brand they are pushing now is named). I would argue that a lot of that isn't very effective, or at least not cost effective in terms of what they spend on it (would Coke really lose multi-millions in sales if they slashed their multi-million dollar marketing budget? I doubt it), but you should still realize it's out there and how you can be affected by it.

  24. Could end up being a little too revealing by bjdevil66 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wife - "Wow - the commercials have changed for the worse, honey... Why do we keep getting ads for pay-per-view porn? I hope the neighbors are seeing this 'cause I'm going to complain to the TV stations and I hope they do too."

    Husband - "Ummm, yeah. I don't know why... these ads are coming. Don't call anyone, though. I'll take care of it..."

  25. Heh. by Kingrames · · Score: 1

    And what happens when someone hacks into their system and replaces ads for fox news with 2 girls, one cup?

    --
    If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    1. Re:Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Justice!

    2. Re:Heh. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      And what happens when someone hacks into their system and replaces ads for fox news with 2 girls, one cup?

      Um, nothing? Do you think anyone would notice a difference?

  26. That could be potentially embarrassing for some... by bjdevil66 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The content of the ads could be a little TOO revealing about people. Imagine this conversation after the Super Bowl party:

    "Did you notice that the Smiths had a lot of ads for bankruptcy lawyers? I wonder what's going on with them..."

    It's not an invasion of privacy, but it is a subversion of privacy.

  27. In this case.. let 'em do it. by kheldan · · Score: 1

    I'm glad I have TiVo. Rarely see commercials at all, and then it's mostly the tail-end of the one at the end of the break, before the program starts again. Yay TiVo! :)

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  28. Lesbian Orange Juice Commercials FTW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I just want to know how to get targeted by Lesbian Orange Juice Commercials and nothing else!
    http://www.metacafe.com/watch/898236/the_lesbian_orange_juice_commercial/

  29. Doesn't matter to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the purpose of even having Cable Television anymore? I mean, seriously -

    1. Cable networks are crap-factories. A couple of the movie networks put out some enjoyable series (ie, Dexter or the Sopranos), but you can easily enjoy those on Netflix for the same cost as one or two of those premium channels, with a ton more flexibility on what you want to watch.

    2. Service. Cable television is one of the worst service industries in the world. Their ridiculously wide "service windows" to come visit you when there is a problem. Their ridiculously uneducated call support centers. Their monopolistic regional control allows them to really not care one way or another if a customer is happy.

    3. Online content - Between Hulu and Netflix, I am able to watch anything I have any interest in watching, when I want to watch it - with minimal commercial interruption. I especially love Hulu's new "2-minute opener ad" that they let you watch, then you get your whole 1-hour episode without interruption.

    So... remind me again why anyone would pay for cable television when it's all available for less money, less hassle, and fewer commercials?

    1. Re:Doesn't matter to me... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      Sports.

      Some of use watch a lot of live sports, and there is no real way watch them online in good quality. You can't get them from Netflix because they are only of interest live.

      Otherwise though I'd be glad to leave the cable company behind.

  30. streams of propaganda by High+On+Markers · · Score: 1

    this could also be useful for sending targetted streams of propaganda out to people's houses. If the ads are targetted, the programs themselves could be as well.

    1. Re:streams of propaganda by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

      It's funny you should mention that, Tracy Hickman wrote a book called "The Immortals" that takes a scary look at what our country could turn into if it was run literally through interactive TV, targeted ads, popular vote on everything by the idiots of the country and using fear to subjugate the country by a religious egomaniac.

      That or it reminds me of Idiocracy :D

    2. Re:streams of propaganda by High+On+Markers · · Score: 1

      I'll try the Immortals if I can get it from my library - thanks for the suggestion. The uncredited source for Idiocracy is CM Kornbluth's "the Marching Morons" - if you ever have time, try it, it's very good. Kornbluth and Frederick Pohl also did a novel in 1952 called "the Space Merchants" which is about the world being controlled by the ad agencies. It's one of my faves.

  31. 5 dollar footlong... by EEBaum · · Score: 1

    Hopefully they have "finds Subway repulsive" on file for me.

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    1. Re:5 dollar footlong... by krray · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they have "finds Subway repulsive" on file for me.

      They do now...

  32. Long Term Progression... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. Free TV with commercials
    2. Promise of pay TV without commercials
    3. Pay TV with commercials
    4. Pay TV with commercials and shopping channels
    5. Pay TV with targeted commercials and shopping channels
    6. Pay TV where they remove your eyes and jab probes directly into your brain so they can harvest your inner most thoughts for a profit

    1. Re:Long Term Progression... by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

      You forgot about the invasive ads beamed directly into your head while you sleep.

    2. Re:Long Term Progression... by tunapez · · Score: 1

      5.1. Pay Radio with promise of no commercials.
      5.2. Pay Radio with commercials
      7. See 6, different ports.

      read the sig...

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
  33. The trouble with this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    is that Cablevision doesn't serve any of the boroughs of New York City - it serves the area around NYC

    This is not to say that CV wouldn't like to provide targeted advertising, but they don't serve the area described in the story - and looking at their systems [from the inside] they don't have the expertise to implement such a system.

  34. No, they just want us to ... by hackingbear · · Score: 1

    in the long term, we end up thinking what they want us to think.

    Think Different (TM)

    1. Re:No, they just want us to ... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

      in the long term, we end up thinking what they want us to think.

      Think Different (TM)

      Like that line of Durango commercials that just said "Dodge. Different." And they were right ... things are bigger and uglier than most other vehicles and get really lousy gas mileage. What do you know, truth in advertising.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  35. Experian sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys have no decency for the consumer. When we had a case of mistaken identity and a supposed debt on our credit card, these guys were the hardest to deal with. Transunion/Equifax rock, but we had to send so many overnight mail packages to Experian and it took them over 6 months to resolve our case and clear the fraudulent charges off of our account. We had to spend over $100 out of pocket to resolve $90 worth of fraudulent debt. Also when we do our fraud reports every 90 days, if we use a different credit company (Transunion/Equifax) to file the fraud report, Experian usually rejects it, so we have to file the report with them directly. Equifax is my favorite, I am neutral on Transunion. At least they will listen to the consumer. I am not at all surprised that Experian would stoop this low and provide consumer credit information to commercial corporations, and it disgusts me. What is next? Are they going to monitor our internet usage and mail us advertisements towards what we browse? (which is 90% porn and 10% slashdot for most of us).

  36. Soon you'll be having ads for your ads by DeadDecoy · · Score: 1

    That kinda reminds me of gametrailers.com and rottentomatoes.com. They let you see movie trailers, which are essentially ads, but most of the time through another ad to see the trailer. While targeted ads are lessing boring than un-targeted ones, I'd hate for marketers to use this as justification for showing more ads.

  37. Re:It's bad enough we get ad's on each page of the by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    Uhhh... sattelite and cable have the same number of commercials. Otherise their schedules would start getting out of sync pretty quick.

  38. They Still Fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could have an ad pop up on my television with my name, address, and a high resolution picture of my dick on it, and I'd still hit the mute button or flip to another channel for the next 60 seconds.

  39. Another reason to remain single by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    The moment you get a girl living with you, all your ads are going to be for feminine hygiene products. On the other hand, this being slashdot, it is better then the ads we are used to, female depence ads for out mothers.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  40. If you don't like it.... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    I posted this in another thread. It is a decent solution to avoid all this, primarily by avoiding the "box". Here are the results he got from making and using this antenna.

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1128309&cid=26860051

    Enjoy.

    ""It's really not that tough to make. You could make one yourself just as easily in an hour or two. Construction is as follows:

    Make eight Vs from 16" lengths of coat hanger, with stripped insulation at the point(EDIT: Guess he means the plastic coated coathangers). The mouths should open about 3.25".

    On a 33" or longer stick, about 2" wide and ½" thick, measure off 8" increments on both sides of the ruler. At each of these marks use a wood screw and washer to hold down a V. It should look like four cats stacked head on head when the stick is upright. These V's, now lying flat, should be pulled forward about 20-35. Just pull on one wire at a time to reduce strain on the screw.

    Next the Vs need connected with two more coat hangers. Each of these hangers is bowed, connecting to the two center Vs on one side, and the two end Vs of the opposite side. Insulation needs removed at all eight woodscrew junctions, but must be intact where the wires cross over each other between the end and center bows.

    Finally, at the center of these two bows (which should be the width of a ruler apart), also strip insulation, insert two additional screws, and attach a UHF-VHF transformer. This is $2 radio shack item which allows one to hook a 300 ohm spade-lug antenna to 75ohm threaded-tube coax cable. The ideal one should be small tube with male threads at one end, and the two spades at the other end which you will screw to the antenna.

    Installation. Hook a 75ohm coax cable between the antenna and the 75ohm air-antenna connector of your tuner. A brass hook in one end of the stick, and another in the ceiling is a convenient method of installation. Mounting it to a pole on the roof would provide even better reception, but then would be difficult to aim if not all your TV stations come from the same direction. Here they all come from Mount Wilson which is 41 East of North from me. Directions of your stations from your zip code and signal strengths can be found at tvfool.com. The cat faces aim at the stations. I pick up all stations with a signal strength of 41 Db or more (the ones shaded in green)."

    I guess he used a cool piece of driftwood for structure.

    Hope this helps."

  41. The Peter Pan Syndrome by westlake · · Score: 1
    Finally no ads with sports, douches,beer,tampons,cereal,toys, insert new pill with horrible side effects here

    The geek discovers the Fountain of Youth. Or maybe not.

  42. People still watch TV? by mario_grgic · · Score: 1

    I'm serious. WTF?

    --
    As the island of our knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance.
  43. Stop the interstitials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop the interstitials and I'll start watching TV again.

    Those suckers are evil.

  44. Florida Election Ads by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    It depends where you live. For example I hear that in Florida you might be the prime target for political ads.

  45. Wait till they combine it with good animation by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    Using the technology the animation houses and gaming industry already has, the demographic data available, and the fact that your cable company knows your name --

    You can get to that creepy place where the talking head on tv turns and talks directly to you by name, then tells you (based on your debit card use at the shopping center) that your brand of anti-itch cream isn't as good as the one they're advertising -- and with that herpes medicine you're taking you should also try their new herbal product...

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  46. Interesting idea... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    ...it seems like a good idea, to raise the possibility that the ad might be for something you care about.

    Isn't that one reason why Google AdSense is considered less obnoxious than other advertising systems?

    Presumably you could DVR your way past these like you do with commercials now anyways.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  47. Doesn't matter.. by SpartaChris · · Score: 1

    I'm just gonna Tivo the show and fast forward through the commercials anyway.

  48. Fine... by gmc5050 · · Score: 1

    but they had better figure out how to tell me the time a show starts IN MY TIME ZONE before they decide that I need more pasta in my diet.

  49. Re:Uhhh... huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can target me all they want, I'm still not going to actually watch the commercials, I call commercial breaks "internet breaks", and for recorded shows I can manually skip past anyway.

  50. Re:Awesome! CV strikes again! by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

    I had some people staying with me about 15 years ago and one of them must have called one of those free 'psychic' lines because a month later (after they had moved into their new house) I got a call from one of these people trying to get me to sign up for something and I hung up on them. Their supervisor called me right back and started to argue with me when I told him I hadn't called the number, and I told them, well, if you were really psychic you'd know that already!

  51. How would that work again? by Eudial · · Score: 1

    What if the subscription owner isn't watching, but his wife, his children, or someone else?

    --
    GAAH! MY PRINTER IS ON FIRE!!! PUT IT OUT! PUT IT OUT!
  52. For those of you who have seen The Network by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's too late, Diana! There's nothing left in you that I can live with! You're one of Howard's humanoids, and, if I stay with you, I'll be destroyed! Like Howard Beale was destroyed. Like Laureen Hobbs was destroyed. Like everything you and the institution of television touch is destroyed. You are television incarnate, Diana, indifferent to suffering, insensitive to joy. All of life is reduced to the common rubble of banality. War, murder, death are all the same to you as bottles of beer. The daily business of life is a corrupt comedy. You even shatter the sensations of time and space into split-seconds and instant replays. You are madness, Diana, virulent madness, and everything you touch dies with you. Well, not me. Not while I can still feel pleasure and pain and love.

    Basically, forget television. It is an expensive waste of time. Go out and have fun. Take your daughter out to the park. Get out and enjo a nice sunny day, like we had today where I live. The hell with television. Its time has passed.

    1. Re:For those of you who have seen The Network by Myrkridian42 · · Score: 1

      Get out and enjoy a nice sunny day, like we had today where I live.

      You actually expect slashdotters will do this?

  53. In Soviet Union, TV Watches You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1985: "In Soviet Union, TV Watches You" was the punchline to a joke about the USSR.
    2009: "In Soviet Union, TV Watches You" is the punchline to a joke about the USSA.

  54. Difficulty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't this be difficult?

    Currently they can't seem to prevent an "Enhanged Water" commercial during a show which is slamming enhanced water. Nor can they prevent an "Obama coin" commercial during a show which was essentially calling it a scam.

  55. Porn by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

    Does this mean it'd be 24/7 porn? You watch porn and receive ads of porn. Porn Porn Porn Porn Po.....*goes into seizure*

  56. Re:That could be potentially embarrassing for some by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    Given that they would be targeting households instead of people, could this also be considered a form of discrimination?

    I'm only halfway serious.

  57. Experian invades yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is disgusting. It would be time to get rid of the TV altogether if we had kids. We boycott anything we consider inappropriately advertised or invasive.

  58. That where bandwidth went to!! by Edgester · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, it's no wonder that we don't have more bandwidth on Cable ISP's vs other countries. All the bandwidth has been held back to send targeted ads!

  59. Isn't this cable TV? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm. Aren't we discussing cable TV service here? How is your neighbour watching Cable 4 going to get a different ad than you? I think the most the targetted ads will be able to do is to be tuned to neighbourhood demographics -- unless you are watching cable-on-demand, anyway.

  60. Re:Just gave me an idea by symbolic · · Score: 1

    What if, instead of telling these companies what we'd *like* to see, we tell them what we *don't* like. Sure it will be a longer list, but its absolutely less revealing in terms of being able to profile people.

  61. Re:Awesome! CV strikes again! by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    Lots of ads for "Ghost Hunters"!

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.