Slashdot Mirror


Cats "Exploit" Humans By Purring

An anonymous reader notes a BBC report on research recently published in the journal Current Biology, indicating that cats manipulate humans by adding a baby-like cry to their purring. "Cat owners may have suspected as much, but it seems our feline friends have found a way to manipulate us humans. Researchers at the University of Sussex have discovered that cats use a 'soliciting purr' to overpower their owners and garner attention and food. Unlike regular purring, this sound incorporates a 'cry,' with a similar frequency to a human baby's. The team said cats have 'tapped into' a human bias — producing a sound that humans find very difficult to ignore."

503 comments

  1. hardware? by Turiko · · Score: 5, Funny

    was the one who tagged this on drugs? hardware? power?

    1. Re:hardware? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the researchers used frozen cats?

    2. Re:hardware? by Arthurio · · Score: 1

      The poor kitty has already been slashdotted.

    3. Re:hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, hardware is one of the effects of pussies.

    4. Re:hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Gentlemen, thaw your pussies"?

    5. Re:hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they read CAT5 instead of cats?

    6. Re:hardware? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1, Funny

      In A.D. 2101
      War was beginning.
      Captain: What happen ?
      Mechanic: Somebody set up us the bomb.
      Operator: We get signal.
      Captain: What !
      Operator: Main screen turn on.
      Captain: It's You !!
      CAT5: How are you gentlemen !!
      CAT5: All your 1000BASE-T are belong to us.
      CAT5: You are on the way to destruction.

      So very sorry.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    7. Re:hardware? by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      I thought the bang in front meant "not."

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  2. Evolution or Intelligent Design? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Assuming that the cats are in fact intelligent creatures, it would make sense that they have learned this behavior. Feral cats do not exhibit this behavior, so it is most likely learned or self-developed.

    However, it could also be that the constant exposure to humans and the direct selection of cats which humans like the most by the owners has led to a selection bias for cats with this behavior.

    I find it hard to believe that this is somehow one of those hokey "100th monkey" behaviors, but I also find it extremely interesting that this behavior is widespread.

    1. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well, as a cat owner I'm not surprised at all. My cat learned quite a few different sounds since I got her, initially it wasn't more than the common meow, but now she uses quite a few different purrs and grunts for different occasions. Like in the morning when feeding time takes too long it's almost like a dog growling in really short bursts, while when you get home it's a more like a high-pitch grunt or purr. I'm sure dogs have similar ways to show their feelings or try to communicate stuff. Cats know damn well what they can and can't do and what will happen when they act some way or another, so it's not a big step from different sounds for different events to learning that certain sounds seem to do trick.

    2. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by timmarhy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      my dog gives me a series of ruffs and whistling sounds if i don't follow the rules in the morning. likes wise if i throw the ball into a place he doesn't want to go he'll come back ruffing to me to tell me i need to be the one to fix the situation. the more i talk to him the more he does it as well.

      cats and dogs are smarter than we give them credit for, when they look at you, they are thinking about something it's not just a vacant look.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by sqldr · · Score: 4, Funny

      You should hear the noise it makes when I mistake its arse for a pencil sharpener.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    4. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Daemonax · · Score: 5, Informative

      Natural selection or artificial selection is what you should have titled that.

      Intelligent design is a term used for a fairly specific type of religious sophistry.

    5. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by RuBLed · · Score: 1

      I only heard you shouting that time...

    6. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by hattig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All I learn from this is that cats that are more insistent (extrovert, cute, lucky to have that purr characteristic), get more food and shelter, and thus a higher chance of survival.

      It's like the introvert in the IT closet who won't ask for a pay rise. Yeah, you're stuck eating ramen then, aren't you. GO AND PURR AT YOUR MANAGER. Unless your manager is Catbert...

    7. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Opportunist · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      DON'T LISTEN TO THAT GUY!

      Last time I did that I went from my manager's office walking funny. You don't want the details.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Stroot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Probably the same sound they make when you put them in the cat carrier: http://www.murphydog.com/cat-carrier.jpg

    9. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "dog growling in really short bursts".
      That is the one cats have found most effective agains humans.

    10. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      You should hear the noise it makes when I mistake its arse for a pencil sharpener.

      Maybe you need to get one of these.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    11. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The main difference between cats and dogs is dogs have owners and cats have staff.

    12. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like your cats learned new sounds to communicate with you. It just took some time for them to teach you all the finer nuances of cat language.

      Have you heard about Pavlovs cats?

    13. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by emanem · · Score: 1

      You're damn right! :-)

    14. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Close, but not quite. Dogs have family, cats have staff.

    15. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like your cats learned new sounds to communicate with you. It just took them some time to teach the finer nuances of cat language to you.

      Have you heard about Pavlov's cat experiments?

    16. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by digitig · · Score: 1

      But since humans are part of nature, artificial selection is natural too. So that makes the title "Natural selection or natural selection?"

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    17. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anarchduke · · Score: 4, Funny

      You haven't met my cat. Sure the humans are staff, but our dogs are part of her family. To the point of sleeping with a front paw over the chihuahua.

      More disturbing was the time she went into heat and tried to convince my Jack Russell terrier to mate with her. I am ever so glad the dog didn't respond.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    18. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by codeButcher · · Score: 5, Funny

      cats and dogs are smarter than we give them credit for, when they look at you, they are thinking about something it's not just a vacant look.

      I'm considering all these anecdotes, about cats and dogs actually being pretty smart, surfacing more and more. One didn't hear those kind of stories when I was little. So I'm wondering: perhaps it's all relative, and it's people who are getting dumber and dumber?

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    19. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      when you (and I) were younger, pets were something you put in the back yard and fed once a day, now they are a part of our lives.

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    20. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      So... it was a bad analogy, then?

    21. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      where is -1 "get off my lawn"

    22. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps pets tend to live indoors more.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    23. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by jkxx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some of it's learned while the rest is inherited. My maine coon running to the VCR and hitting the stop button to get my attention would definitely qualify as learned behavior though.

    24. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could have made a fortune selling the video of that. To say nothing of the market value of the caog that resulted from it.

    25. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by maxume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's the sound of anger and frustration.

      Any animal would be angry and frustrated to find out that the being in control of their life was a moron.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    26. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a situation where it is just you and the cat for the most part, both of you will eventually adapt to a common set of sounds in order to communicate. I have a double-chirp that I use to talk to my cat, and over time she's learned to make a similar double-chirp style noise.

    27. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      But since humans are part of nature, artificial selection is natural too. So that makes the title "Natural selection or natural selection?"

      Both "natural selection" and "artificial selection" have specific meanings. "Artificial selection" is a process by which human breeders arrange selection of traits they prefer while "natural selection" is the process by which traits that improve survival are favoured. Just because humans are part of nature does not make the two terms synonymous.

    28. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It is learned behavior. My cats are incredibly vocal and that is not normal for felines. Cats are typically quiet creatures in the wild. This "discovery" is not new. Many animal behavioral researchers have surmised that the purring is used to manipulate in domesticated cats. If every time kitty purrs it get's something it likes, it associates purring with getting good things so it tries to use it.

      just like dogs, they will whimper like a pup at times to manipulate a human. It's actually a reaction from pack behavior where the whimper is a "I give in, you're alpha dog!" but us stupid humans take it as "ohh I hurt the doggie" so we give them negative reinforcement that if they whimper we will stop punishing them.

      It's not like the article suggests that cat's are fully sentient and in their research lab decided that humans are easily controlled so they set out a SMS message to all their cat bretheren.

      If you zap a monkey every time he eats a blue biscuit and praise him on the red biscuit, the monkey will learn to hate the blue biscuit. This is last century animal behavioral study material.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    29. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Cats ARE intelligent creatures, but like humans some are smarter than others. But I don't quite believe this study (from what I read yesterday in New Scientist and today in TFA). They seldom purr when they're hungry; they'll nag you to feed them, though. It doesn't make sense.

      "He would wake me up in the morning with this insistent purr that was really rather annoying," Dr McComb told BBC News.

      While meowing might get a cat expelled from the bedroom, Dr McComb said that this pestering purr often convinced beleaguered pet lovers to get up and fill their cat's bowl.

      An "annoying" purr would get my cat expelled from the bedroom as fast as meowing. The conclusions are illogical.

      Cats in heat often sound exactly like crying babies, but not seeing the actual study and having three cats I suspect that this research is highly flawed.

      TFA says this Karen McComb is a biologist, but it doesn't say what her specialty is or what other studies she's done. I'm skeptical. Forget cats' intelligence, what is Dr. McComb's IQ?

    30. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      One of my cats has taken to jumping on the computer desk and lying down on the keyboard because I'm spending too much time in the Domain of Anguish and not enough time lavishing attention on her.

      If she wasn't already "fixed", it would be bordering on evolution-limiting behavior...

    31. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you get the raise?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    32. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by querist · · Score: 1

      Dogs have owners. Cats have staff.

    33. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 1

      It is now, but give it a few years and it will be a growth industry.

    34. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like your cats learned new sounds to communicate with you. It just took them some time to teach the finer nuances of cat language to you.
       
      Have you heard about Pavlov's cat experiments?

    35. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yes but they are still animals and will revert to a full animal at any instance. It's why a cat that will come at most times will not come near you when they are hurt or scared, that's the animal kicking back in. Or a dog will try to rip into a strange dog trying to eat it's dinner.

      dont believe me? then you've never been in the middle of a dog fight of loving adorable poochies woochies.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    36. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it's the opposite, that before, people (at least westerners) were too dumb to realize how intelligent they were. There's a line from the movie Little Big Man where Chief Dan George's character talks of the difference between the Natives and the transplanted Europeans (not an exact quote): "The Indian, we think everything is alive - the coyote, the bear, the trees, even the rocks. But the white man, he thinks everything is dead, and if he suspects something is alive he'll kill it."

    37. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Ewwww....

      Kitty Porn

    38. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by digitig · · Score: 1
      [Rearranged]

      "natural selection" is the process by which traits that improve survival are favoured.

      It's producing offspring that's favoured, rather than survival.

      Both "natural selection" and "artificial selection" have specific meanings. "Artificial selection" is a process by which human breeders arrange selection of traits they prefer

      Which therefore promotes the production of offspring in the environment that includes those human breeders (as opposed to dog breeders? :-) and so is still natural selection. The problem with the term artificial selection is that it misleadingly sets humans outside of the process as something standing above nature and controlling it rather than just as much a part of nature as everything else.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    39. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by jenn_13 · · Score: 1

      mod insightful! When our pets live in our houses with us, and are part of the family, we notice their personalities more. Makes me wonder why people bothered to even have pets back then, just to leave them outside all the time. To catch the rats or something, I guess? I can't imagine having a pet that wasn't part of the family, myself.

    40. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by tixxit · · Score: 1

      Cats don't really use vocal communication amongst themselves, they communicate with body language more then anything. Ever see 2 cats meet for the first time? A lot is said without so much as a meow. Most vocalizations a cat makes are for human benefit only. And I know exactly what you are talking about with that growl-thing. My cat makes that weird interrupted growling noise, usually when I won't play with him or stop playing with him. He even has a weird "chirping" he does (a series of very short, high-pitched noises), but he only does it when my fiance makes the noise at him first, then the 2 go back and forth. Haven't seen him do it with anyone else.

    41. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      Intelligent design is primarily discussed by religious people, but it's an entirely separate concept.

    42. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know many things about us the cats.

    43. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 1

      That's funny, my cat (and some other cats I know) does the chirping/chattering thing when it spots a bird or a bug outside. I always thought they were trying to mimic bird chattering when they do that, to fool the birds or something. They're strange beasties, them cats ;-)

      You're right about the vocal communication thing, I've never seen cats making sounds to each other either. But they do also carry over many of the non-vocal cues to humans, like headbutting your head, punching, or jumping on you if they need something.

    44. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by skorch · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps we're getting smarter and smarter, and are more able to recognize different types of more subtle intelligence. Then again, maybe when you were little you just weren't involved in these kinds of conversations?

    45. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that the cats are in fact intelligent creatures, it would make sense that they have learned this behavior. Feral cats do not exhibit this behavior, so it is most likely learned or self-developed.

      However, it could also be that the constant exposure to humans and the direct selection of cats which humans like the most by the owners has led to a selection bias for cats with this behavior.

      I find it hard to believe that this is somehow one of those hokey "100th monkey" behaviors, but I also find it extremely interesting that this behavior is widespread.

      I have 3 cats. Only one exhibits this behavior, but all of them have ways of annoying for food. When they want to be fed at 5:30 they bat the blinds, to make noise. If you raise the blinds, they move on to other equally annoying behaviors. Ultimately I do my masters bidding and feed them.

    46. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Domain of Anguish sucks anyway. Those debuffs are annoying. Your cat is smart. :P

    47. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And humans are significantly different? We might not go animal when someone swipes a hot wing (unless alcohol is involved) but it still doesn't take much.

    48. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my dog gives me a series of ruffs and whistling sounds if i don't follow the rules in the morning. likes wise if i throw the ball into a place he doesn't want to go he'll come back ruffing to me to tell me i need to be the one to fix the situation. the more i talk to him the more he does it as well.

      You, sir, have just described my boss too. Aren't you by chance a senior manager?

      cats and dogs are smarter than we give them credit for, when they look at you, they are thinking about something it's not just a vacant look.

      Now this is where the differences start to show.

    49. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main difference between cats and dogs is dogs have owners and cats have staff.

      I'm reminded of the old joke.....

      A dog thinks "my master feeds me, houses me, and cares for me.....he must be god."

      A cat thinks "my master feeds me, houses me, and cares for me.....I must be god."

    50. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Those debuffs are annoying.

      Your gift for understatement is impressive. ;) Alas, I need my Mallyx statue...

    51. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I think it counts as neotenous cultural behavior. "Neoteny" refers to a juvenile characteristic that's retained into adulthood, like those salamanders that never lose their gills because they live in the desert. Now, domestic cats retains lots of kitten behaviors that disappear if they're not socialized with humans early on: purring, that habit of "making bread" in your lap (kittens need to massage momma's mammaries in order to get them to work), and of course that pitiful meow they resort to whenever they want you to do something for them.

      I was amused by this thought from the submitter:

      Cat owners may have suspected as much, but it seems our feline friends have found a way to manipulate us humans.

      Suspected? Suspected??? Every cat lover knows they are the most manipulative, self-centered creatures on the planet! God knows what it says about us that we love them all the more for it!

    52. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming that the cats are in fact intelligent creatures, it would make sense that they have learned this behavior. Feral cats do not exhibit this behavior, so it is most likely learned or self-developed.

      However, it could also be that the constant exposure to humans and the direct selection of cats which humans like the most by the owners has led to a selection bias for cats with this behavior.

      I find it hard to believe that this is somehow one of those hokey "100th monkey" behaviors, but I also find it extremely interesting that this behavior is widespread.

      All animals are intelligent creatures as they adapt their environment to suit their needs, engage in active problem solving, and teach their young to survive. These are all signs of intelligence by our own standards. Humans that believe otherwise suffer from an arrogance complex. Take my cats for example, I can see them engage in active problem solving and reasoning. Cats rarely meow to each other in communication but make various other vocalizations like chirping in frustration or warnings. Instead, cats principally communicate through eyes and body language. The meow vocalization, it has been theorized, is an attempt on the cat's part to communicate with us because it observes humans vocalizing with each other. My two cats have learned how to get my attention through trial and error. I don't know if this is evolution because most complex mamals have the ability to reason. I think this is social learning on the part our cats.

    53. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or good programming

    54. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

        That's an easy one.

        Cats are going to run the world after we kill ourselves off.

        They've been plotting it for thousands of years, just waiting. We had the opposable thumbs, we built this technological syphilization, and when we're gone, they'll just take over.

        It's likely they'll do a lot better job at it than we do, too.

        Long term planning...

        SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    55. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by msimm · · Score: 1

      cats and dogs are smarter than we give them credit for

      I always figured that although we are probably as smart as we think we are our inability to definitively define language and intelligence was a reasonable reason to reserve judgment. Usually that would have applied to the idea of alien life and intelligence (why would it be like terrestrial intelligence?) but it seems possible enough that our own arrogance and simplified understandings of our environment might lead us to make incorrect conclusions (or not).

      --
      Quack, quack.
    56. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Faerunner · · Score: 1

      One of my cats utters shortened meows when he watches the birds out the window, but it's not quite chirping. He's the most vocal of our 3 and will trill (purr-meow) when coming to us or when he wants our attention as he goes somewhere. Our kitten is just learning, but is already figuring out that the siren meow doesn't always work on me (the way I see it, if she learns to beg loudly now and gets stuff for it, she'll be spoiled rotten and decide to be loud at 3am when she wants something...), so she is attempting purrs and other noises to get our attention. The cats also definitely have sounds for when they're uncomfortable or want to get away (as when we're trimming their claws, or giving the occasional flea-dip). Even people who have never heard a cat before would be able to identify the yowls of one who is not happy.

      We are planning on a dog some time in the future, and while we have not trained the cats intensively in the past, I may attempt to train one or two of them along with the dog, to see which one picks up on the training faster, and how the results differ. (Naturally I'll be using different treats for the cat than the dog).

    57. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cat must have had sharp knees...

    58. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend and I were talking about dogs and cats. He brought up the fact that dogs offer unconditional love. Yeah, well, so do groupies. Sure they can be fun for a while, but a proper girlfriend is better in the long run. You have to work a bit harder for the latter but you end up with something based on earned trust.

      But to the original post, animals communicate. That's just what we do - although sometimes we need to work a bit to find what works.

      For instance, when my wife and I bought a house we moved in to find that the previous owners had left their cat. My wife had two girl cats already and we were hoping to get a kitten, but this unannounced interloper threatened to take that slot. At the time, we thought he was an unattractive Gateway Cow colored cat and were really trying to come to grips the situation. To make matters worse, at precisely 5:30 in the morning he would start terrorizing the other cats. Then he'd run to the door to get let out. That occurred for three days in a row before I realized that that's how he had learned to ask to go out. So instead, I chased him around the house (through the basement, upstairs, etc.). The AM terror stopped on that day and he learned more civilized ways to ask to go out.

      He eventually became my most favorite cat of all. We developed an unspoken language. He would accompany us on walks with the dogs (well, for a couple of blocks anyways). We had ways to call each other to play. And remains the only cat to ever take me down. I was out in the back yard and noticed he was following me. I sped up a bit and so did he. Then a little more.... Then I broke out in a full run and quickly felt a furry clamp around my ankle. I knew that following through with my stride would probably mean that he'd never follow me again, so I froze that leg and predictably landed on my side. When I looked around he was standing there with his chest pumped out and a little Kimba-esque smile on his face. I burst out laughing.

      My dogs would love to tackle me like that, but could never have the class to let it go at that.

    59. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      Dog: These humans, they feed me, they pet me, give me everything I need, they are gods to me!
      Cat: These humans, they feed me, they pet me, give me everything I need, I must be a god!

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    60. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by josiebgoode · · Score: 1

      Kitten Still Loves Puppy: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTstzR4gwAw

    61. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by josiebgoode · · Score: 1

      a cat that will come at most times will not come near you when they are hurt or scared

      It depends. I had cats who came to me when they were sick or injured as they knew from past experiences that me or the vet could help make the pain goes away.

      As for now, one of my cats has glaucoma and she comes to me when I'm late for her eyedrops but only for one of the two kinds she got 4 times a day.

      She doesn't like the other kind of eyedrops and she run away when the time comes. But recently I got feet surgery and I'm not walking too well. She still tends to run away but when I beg her to stop as I'm not able to chase her, she freezes and let herself be picked up without resistance.

    62. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by josiebgoode · · Score: 1

      When Loulou, my 8 pound siamese cat, saw a 12 pound stranger came in the garden, he knew he couldn't faced him. So he hid behind a small wall and made horrible howling noises. This strategy worked. The big fat stranger ran away at once and never went back.

    63. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by tixxit · · Score: 1

      Our kitten is just learning, but is already figuring out that the siren meow doesn't always work on me (the way I see it, if she learns to beg loudly now and gets stuff for it, she'll be spoiled rotten and decide to be loud at 3am when she wants something...)

      My cat stayed with my parents for a year when he was still pretty young. My dad is a sucker for cats and would always attend to him every time he meowed, even if he was asleep. So, when he came back to live with me, I got quite the surprise when he started meowing, non-stop, at 5am to get me up. Knowing cats, I just ignored him and tried to get back to sleep. It took about 2 weeks to break the habit, but those were 2 terrible weeks of sleep.

    64. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      [Rearranged]

      "natural selection" is the process by which traits that improve survival are favoured.

      It's producing offspring that's favoured, rather than survival.

      What?

      Both "natural selection" and "artificial selection" have specific meanings. "Artificial selection" is a process by which human breeders arrange selection of traits they prefer

      Which therefore promotes the production of offspring in the environment that includes those human breeders (as opposed to dog breeders? :-) and so is still natural selection. The problem with the term artificial selection is that it misleadingly sets humans outside of the process as something standing above nature and controlling it rather than just as much a part of nature as everything else.

      Nobody is trying to deny that humans are part of nature. You are just arguing semantics for some unknown reason. Artificial selection is the human-controlled selection of human-desired traits. Natural selection is the selection of traits that improve survival. If you can't see the difference between those two definitions then I can't help you.

    65. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by digitig · · Score: 1

      [Rearranged]

      "natural selection" is the process by which traits that improve survival are favoured.

      It's producing offspring that's favoured, rather than survival.

      What?

      If you survive but don't produce offspring then your genes don't get passed on. If you don't survive but do produce offspring (eg, spiders, octopodes etc) then your genes do get passed on. Except for a few specialist cases where the non-reproducer's genes are passed on another way (eg bees, which muddy the notion of the individual) natural selection favours the reproducing.

      Both "natural selection" and "artificial selection" have specific meanings. "Artificial selection" is a process by which human breeders arrange selection of traits they prefer

      Which therefore promotes the production of offspring in the environment that includes those human breeders (as opposed to dog breeders? :-) and so is still natural selection. The problem with the term artificial selection is that it misleadingly sets humans outside of the process as something standing above nature and controlling it rather than just as much a part of nature as everything else.

      Nobody is trying to deny that humans are part of nature. You are just arguing semantics for some unknown reason. Artificial selection is the human-controlled selection of human-desired traits. Natural selection is the selection of traits that improve survival. If you can't see the difference between those two definitions then I can't help you.

      A lot of people do deny it, and it results in bullshit like claims of humans putting an end to natural selection. Having a trait that humans like increases the chance of passing on ones genes, and the way in which that works is just as much natural selection as having a flavour that the major predators in the area don't like.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    66. Re:Evolution or Intelligent Design? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dont believe me? then you've never been in the middle of a dog fight of loving adorable poochies woochies.

      Having experienced being in the middle of both bloody dog and human fights, I have to say this is less evidence of them reverting to a feral state as it is proof that all the species you mention can experience anger strong enough to overide social bonds and other inhibitions. I will also add that in an aftermath of a fight, dogs are generally much more inclined to "kiss and make-up" than humans.

  3. I probably shouldn't have kids... by Kokuyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seem to be 95% immune to my cats when they pull tricks like that. My cats know damn well that I'll feed them before going to bed. It can happen anywhere between coming home and right before actually going to bed.

    My cats are persistent, make no mistake, and my wife can be very annoyed with them, but I usually wait until I happen to feel like feeding them. So if their mewling is comparable to a baby's cry I shudder to think what kind of dad I'd make ;).

    I should mention, though, that they have dry food available at any time so it's not like they're hungry when I feed them. It is actually a very interesting way to learn to not give in to annoying behaviour.

    1. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It is actually a very interesting way to learn to not give in to annoying behaviour.

      This alone tells me that you'll be one of the few parents that raise good kids.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping so, but only time and actually raising one or two will tell :).

    3. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by value_added · · Score: 1

      So if their mewling is comparable to a baby's cry I shudder to think what kind of dad I'd make ;).

      I wouldn't worry. Most all women who have had more than one or two children know how and when to ignore a crying baby.

      I've had just about any animal you could think of as a pet, but I've learned over the years that barring any individual's fascination with cats (and the requisite personality traits required for membership in a cult or a successful career as a waiter), dogs make far better pets. Hell, even for the mythical coder case (where someone expects a low-maintenance pet), there a countless breeds of dogs that will happily sleep at your feet or otherwise leave you undisturbed for hours at a time. The difference, of course, having a dog might inspire you to venture outside for a walk after an over-long session.

      A purring cat is like a crying baby? You could say the same of any animal that we eat for food, or is otherwise a pest. Baby rats, for example, make cute high pitched noises and are no less pink. Few would have any problem killing them or their entire family.

    4. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by markdavis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >dogs make far better pets. [...]that will happily sleep at your feet or otherwise leave you undisturbed for hours at a time That is just YOUR opinion, though. I think cats make far better pets. They, too, will leave me undisturbed for hours at a time and yet happily sleep in my lap. They are interesting, soft, beautiful, loving, playful, relatively easy to care for, trainable (not as much as a dog, though), flealess (indoor), generally quiet, have a long lifespan, and self-grooming.

    5. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by that+IT+girl · · Score: 1

      A-FREAKIN-MEN to that.

      --
      10 FILL MUG WITH COFFEE
      20 DRINK COFFEE
      30 GOTO 10
    6. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Anarchduke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just don't feed the kids once a day out of a food bowl and you're good to go.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    7. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by sakdoctor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, just remember not to take photos of your kids in amusing positions and photo-shop "OH HAI" onto them, and you'll have made a good start.

    8. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by pilsner.urquell · · Score: 4, Funny

      The more you know about cats, the more you know about women. Simply put when they want attention, they want it NOW.

    9. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is actually a very interesting way to learn to not give in to annoying behaviour.

      This alone tells me that you'll be one of the few parents that raise good kids.

      Deeming any creatures (baby or pet) only way of communicating it's necessity for food an "annoying behaviour" suggests he will more than likely make an appalling parent ever.

    10. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kun I haz my bottl now PLEEZE???

    11. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Your attention span obviously does not cover more than two or three lines of text, eyh? ;)

    12. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Something tells me lolkidz would be a really popular website for cute pictures with funny captions. Until some politician hears the name of the website and sends the FBI to shut it down with extreme prejudice without actually checking what the site is about.

    13. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Znork · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, cats and babies use what works. If a specific sound is what gets you going, then that's the sound you'll get when they want something. Which is why your approach is perfectly fine; as long as you know there's nothing really wrong, training them to sound like something's horribly amok all the time isn't desirable.

      On the other hand, sometimes it's good to reinforce nice ways of asking for attention. Personally I give in and play a bit when my cats roll over on their backs and purr (just far enough out of reach so I can't pet them), or when they bring their toys to me. Or I'll look what they want if they tug at my elbow. The only annoying sound that will get them something is the plaintive meow accompanied by scratching the floor near the litter box. That one means 'the litterbox is dirty, change it or I'm gonna piss on the floor', and considering they usually have a point and a reasonable tolerance, I'll accept that one.

    14. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by happy_place · · Score: 1

      I would think folks who don't own a cat "immune" to cat influence. Not a cat owner. :) (Always wanted a cat, but had a mean mommy. Then married a woman with allergies, and so the dream of being manipulated by small four-legged mammals will have to come via my kids...)

      --
      http://www.beanleafpress.com
    15. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I'm not allowed to have kids. I find the smell generated by children (yes, clean babies smell different than clean children, different than teenagers and adults) overpowering and horrible. They're disgustingly ugly, and all nasty and gooey. If I had my own I would murder them all and destroy the world that allowed such a thing to come into existence.

    16. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Bibz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, lolkidz already exists : http://lolkids.com/ . It has a S instead of a Z, but it's the same thing. Looking at it for a moment and it doesn't even come close to been funny...

      --
      I didn't found something funny to put here.
    17. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by hey! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unless his cats have him so totally hypnotized he doesn't realize he's their slave. Seen teenagers do the Jedi mind trick plenty of times.

      In any case, as an older guy, I remember that phase of my life when my friends would extrapolate from their pet owning experience to their incipient parental prowess. I won't spoil the fun, other than to say this: you'll find out for yourself. It's a hell of a ride, in every sense of the word.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    18. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by arethuza · · Score: 1

      Ah - but wait till you smell *your* kids. Of course other people's children smell horrible, but your own smell lovely.

    19. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      I seem to be 95% immune to my cats when they pull tricks like that. My cats know damn well that I'll feed them before going to bed. It can happen anywhere between coming home and right before actually going to bed.

      My cats are fed by a robot, and they come and purr at me after breakfast has been served and eaten.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    20. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by jenn_13 · · Score: 1

      I think they're referring to the kids that whine or have tantrums in a store until their parents give in and buy them whatever candy or toy it is that they want. No one in their right mind would say that about an infant's crying...

    21. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Sabz5150 · · Score: 1

      It is actually a very interesting way to learn to not give in to annoying behaviour.

      This alone tells me that you'll be one of the few parents that raise good kids.

      And a decent moderator, too.

      --
      "Who modded this informative? Whoever it is must've been smokin' some of that martian pot!"
    22. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see, for me, this is the whole reason I like cats. They'll knock over a bag of treats so that when I pick it up I give them one. Sure, that means they'll do it again because they know it works, but it's also hilarious.

    23. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Now if we could just get all the Oprah watching, Dr Phil loving idiots of America to get this into their heads maybe we wouldn't have so many little bastards walking around who need their asses kicked.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    24. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Dogs are like children. You can't leave them on their own for too long without bad things happening.

      Cats OTOH can take care of themselves. If I'm going to be gone for a week on vacation I can put out enough food and water and an extra litter box and they won't have destroyed the house while I'm gone (other than coughing up a hairball or two).

      With at dog I either have to take it with me or find some other place for it to stay while I'm gone.

    25. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      You're exactly right, I don't know how it works, but when it's your own kid, you won't mind any smell from them.

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    26. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by arethuza · · Score: 1

      Well, at least until boys get to be about ten and decide that they want to stop washing.

    27. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I could never consider children "mine," they are just "things." "Things" that need to be "destroyed." They aren't useful until they're about, what, 13? And female. Then they're decent eye candy. (Why the fuck do 13 year old girls look like girls anyway? They have tits! And hips!). Once they break 18 (yeah AoC is 16 but you really don't want to deal with them, they're brats), they're way, way more useful.

    28. Re:I probably shouldn't have kids... by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      and then you've grown too attached to them to kick them out :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
  4. Self domesticated by msgmonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't forget that cats self-domesticated so the the evolution of this kind of behaviour would have been baised from the begining.

    1. Re:Self domesticated by jonadab · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > Don't forget that cats self-domesticated

      Thing is, cats *aren't* domesticated. They only pretend to be when it suits their purposes.

      If you want to see what domesticated looks like, look at dogs, or horses. Domesticated dogs and horses take their instructions from human masters. Cats, as a rule, don't.

      Cats live *among* humans and coexist more or less peacefully with them, but so do squirrels and houseflies. Cats accept food from humans and even depend on it as their main food source, but so do wild birds that eat at feeders. Cats will even occasionally approach a human and allow themselves to be petted, but only when it's their idea.

      There's a continual argument between people who prefer dogs and people who prefer cats, over which kind of animal is smarter. Of course, there's a great deal of variation in intelligence from one dog to another, and one supposes there may also be from one cat to another, but fundamentally the main reason this argument has never been resolved is because nobody can really demonstrate exactly how smart cats are, because the cats don't cooperate with the study. If you've got a dog, you can find out exactly how smart he is, based on what you can teach him. A monumentally stupid dog can learn about one trick, and then when you try to teach him another, he either can't figure it out or forgets the first one. On the other end of the scale, the most intelligent dog I've ever known recognized an English vocabulary of several hundred words and understood SVO sentence order. With a dog, you can find out exactly how smart he is, because he'll cooperate with the whole exercise. A dog is a social animal. His whole life is focused around *you*. A cat is altogether a different beast. A cat does what it wants, when it wants. You can try to teach it stuff, but as a rule the cat doesn't cooperate, so you can never really be sure what it's learned and what it hasn't.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    2. Re:Self domesticated by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      If you want to see what domesticated looks like, look at dogs, or horses. Domesticated dogs and horses take their instructions from human masters. Cats, as a rule, don't

      I guess I've got the exceptions. My two cats are much better at coming when called than the dog. They learn commands, although they're better with gestures than oral instructions. And it's the cats who greet me at the door, the dog waits to see if it's worth getting up for. Anyway, just as individuals vary in intelligence, so do they vary in attitude. And I've never once pet a squirrel.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    3. Re:Self domesticated by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, it isn't *that* difficult to train a cat. Most people just don't bother.

    4. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dog is manipulating you just as the cats are. They are performing their tricks to please you into giving them a "treat," which is the usual reward for their completion of the degrading acts which they are taught to do. Cats, on the other hand, manipulate from the very start and most very well do not care about performing tricks or other such nonsense. Personally, I would count the cats are being smarter... their behavior is more like: "You want me to do this thing that the dogs do, making myself look extremely pathetic and stupid in the process and then, MAYBE, you will give me a small food reward after? Nah, I don't think so, human. I will simply act cute when I need to, purr a little and let out a mew at the same time, thereby training YOU to obey MY will."

    5. Re:Self domesticated by jfrankmbl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How much of this perception is expectation? I've had cats and dogs, and while I agree that dogs are easier to train, it is still possible to completely train your cats to respond to verbal and gestural commands. I think a lot of people don't even try to train their cats, or treat them like untrainable companions because that is what they expect. When the cat does something bad, instead of looking how to modify the behavior, people say "oh, that's cats for you!" and then give the cat attention (either negative or positive). I think one of the big differences between cats and dogs that set up this mentality is cats respond a lot better to negative attention than do dogs. When a dog is punished, he feels cut off from the pack, and while negative attention is slightly better than nothing for a dog, it has a more significant impact in reducing unwanted behavior when paired with intermittent positive reinforcement. Cats on the other hand, just like attention. When training them, you just can NOT punish bad behavior unless it is a serious transgression (knocking over the tv, smothering the baby, etc). Instead you have to focus on rewarding positive behavior. So, if your cat meows a lot, don't yell at him or squirt him because he then will continue to meow--he thinks you are talking or playing with him. Instead, wait until he stops and reward the silence. Cats are a little more like toddlers. In general, the most negative action I take is to ignore them, but then give them lots of praise and reward for acting in ways I approve. So don't say cats don't take instruction from humans. I think it would be more accurate to say dog and horse owners take more care to understand the psychology of their pets and put more effort in training them, and as a rule, give up on cats before they even try training because they have already jumped to the conclusion it's impossible.

    6. Re:Self domesticated by siloko · · Score: 1

      A cat does what it wants, when it wants.

      Indeed, unfortunately my cat, Oscar, simply wants to eat and is now as fat as a soccer ball. Call me cruel but when he's just sitting there looking petulant the temptation is often too much . . .

    7. Re:Self domesticated by msgmonkey · · Score: 1

      > Don't forget that cats self-domesticated

      Thing is, cats *aren't* domesticated. They only pretend to be when it suits their purposes.

      If you want to see what domesticated looks like, look at dogs, or horses. Domesticated dogs and horses take their instructions from human masters. Cats, as a rule, don't.

      I would n't count horses as domesticated since the "breaking-in" is pretty cruel imho. I've had a cat that lived for 15 years so I know what a cat is like. I've been to places where there are both normal and "wild" cats that even as kittens will not go near humans. I agree a cat won't hang around you if it does n't want to and if you want loyalty get a dog.

      As for which is smarter, it has never really bothered me you're either a cat person or a dog person.

    8. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good post and all true

    9. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... nobody can really demonstrate exactly how smart cats are, because the cats don't cooperate with the study.

      Some might say not cooperating with people trying to make you do silly tricks is a sign of superiour intelligence in itself...

    10. Re:Self domesticated by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      You apparently are not a master at Advanced Cat Yodeling

    11. Re:Self domesticated by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're wrong; thay are domesticated, moreso than horeses and almost as much as dogs. They just have different psychologies. I taught my oldest daughter's cat to fall down and play dead when I point my finger at it and say "bang. We had cats when the kids were growing up, and the cats listened better than the kids.

      I care for my oldest daughter's cats, they'll come when called and obey other instructions.

      Cats live *among* humans and coexist more or less peacefully with them, but so do squirrels and houseflies.

      That's bullshit. Try petting a squirrel.

      The biggest difference between dogs and cats is that "nice" dogs are whores, letting anyone pet it. Try petting a mean rottweiler; I've seen dogs bite their own owners.

    12. Re:Self domesticated by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Self domesticated? are you nuts?

      Cats were domesticated normally originally in Mesopotamia, you really need to learn about cats. The wierd part is the bizzare letting the animal do what it wants holdover from a few millennium ago is all out bizzare.

      My cats act like my dog. They come when called, they fetch (one LOVES fetch big time) they actually do tricks very well. And people are incredibly astonished at this. My youngest cat is not de-clawed as it is a experiment. It will NOT claw anyone it plays with, but will claw when hurt. It will NOT bite hard when playing even with the other cat that DOES bite hard. but then I conditioned it to think that grabbing it's head is being nice to it so it will walk up to people and shove it's head into their hands. It freaks people out.

      it's simple training, anyone can do it (they use the toilet as well, cant get them to flush though) it's simply that most people choose to not do it so they can let kitty be a giant pain in the arse and serve it.

      The absolute worst kind of cat owner is the ones that let kitty roam the neighborhood free. That is wrong and incredibly rude. Kiltty can die or get hurt in tons of ways many a cat hater leaves out bowls of antifreeze to kill kitties that enter their yard, and letting them piss and crap all over the neighborhood is simply being a jerk.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:Self domesticated by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You've only ever observed untrained cats.

      Raise a dog or horse the way most people raise a cat and you get the same behavioral patterns.

      My cats and Many Many others across the world are fully domesticated and act like dogs.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Self domesticated by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      And it's the cats who greet me at the door

      That would most likely be because they want food from you.

    15. Re:Self domesticated by schon · · Score: 1

      Thing is, cats *aren't* domesticated. They only pretend to be when it suits their purposes.

      Of course they're domesticated. Don't be an ass.

      Domesticated dogs and horses take their instructions from human masters. Cats, as a rule, don't.

      Only becase their owners can't be bothered or are too stupid to realize it's quite easy.

      I've owned five cats in my life, and three dogs, and as a general rule there's nothing preventing you from training a cat to "take instruction" (although it's possible to find untrainable cats, just like you can find untrainable dogs.)

      A dog is a social animal. His whole life is focused around *you*. A cat is altogether a different beast.

      No. Cats form sophisticated social structures similar to, but distinct from dogs. They are social creatures. Just because the majority of cat owners are elitist asses who don't want to acknowledge this doesn't make it false.

      A cat does what it wants, when it wants. You can try to teach it stuff, but as a rule the cat doesn't cooperate, so you can never really be sure what it's learned and what it hasn't.

      *sigh* Could you please provide some scientific backing for your claims?

    16. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reminded of this video in which a person purports to train a cat to operate a light switch. But I'm wondering if there's a difference between training and conditioning.

    17. Re:Self domesticated by Trouvist · · Score: 1

      The problem is that you actually feed it like a human: on a schedule or something similar to it. Sadly it might not work anymore, but I find that just leaving food out 100% of the time for the cats means they eat what they NEED when they want it, and the rest of the time leave it alone. I currently live with 3 cats who are all in great shape, contrasting with everyone I know who feeds theirs on a schedule: the cat ends up being starved or overweight. Feed them like cats; give them food all the time and let them decide when to eat like a feral cat would. The act of giving only certain amounts works like it does in prison (eat everything you are served or you might lose it or not get mored since you have no control). Giving them the choice/option of when to eat means the cat usually won't overeat as long as it hasn't been trained to eat 100% of what is available when it becomes available (probably the situation your cat is in, which is exacerbated by you succumbing to that temptation you mention).

    18. Re:Self domesticated by pimp0r · · Score: 1

      Actually, it isn't *that* difficult to get a PhD in psychology. Most people just don't bother.

    19. Re:Self domesticated by jenn_13 · · Score: 1

      Actually, our cats greet us at the door too, and most of the time, they still have plenty of food at the time. They're actually very sociable. Whenever we have company come over, they come to check the people out. One of them even plays fetch; when I throw one of his little toys into the next room, after he tackles it into submission and bats it around, he usually brings it back to me to throw it again. He may have been a puppy in a past life.

    20. Re:Self domesticated by jenn_13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and letting them piss and crap all over the neighborhood is simply being a jerk.

      This is very true. When people let their dogs do their business in our yard, and do not pick it up, I want to find out where they live so I can empty our litterbox in *their* yard...
      And seriously, the world is not a safe place to let any kind of animal run free anymore, there are just too many mean people who think it's fun to kill or torture animals. Our kitties are indoor only.

    21. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would argue cats' lack of cooperation alone proves they are more intelligent than dogs.

    22. Re:Self domesticated by arethuza · · Score: 1

      We have friends who let their cat eat as much turkey as it wanted one Xmas - poor little bugger ended up going to the vet to have it's stomach pumped (or whatever the equivalent operation is for felines).

    23. Re:Self domesticated by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, mine wanted to get scratched every morning, so I trained him to listen for when the shower is done, wait a minute or so, and then come in. he sits patiently on the toilet seat, I scratch him for about 30 seconds to a minute and then say "All done", and he hops off and walks out. Before training him, he'd rub up against my leg all morning, driving me nuts. Now, I spend 1 minute giving him attention, he's happy, and I get my morning back.

      Yes, you certainly can train a cat.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    24. Re:Self domesticated by Metasquares · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're correct. Tenacity matters much more than intelligence in a doctoral program.

    25. Re:Self domesticated by Tacvek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cats do have a strong independent streak. While they are often trainable, it does have a fair bit to do with them being willing to be trained. If they are willing or neutral about the activity being trained, they will be fairly receptive. If they dislike the activity being trained it can be difficult to impossible to train them. They most certainly can learn to come when you call them, although even well trained cats will occasionally choose not to come. My cat for example will often come to me if I talk in her direction, even if I do not use her name, and even if I am not talking to her. But at other times, she will not, because she has something else she wishes to do.

      If a cat truly does not want to do something it is almost impossible to use training to compel them to do so. Similarly, if a cat really wants to do something (and does not require human assistance to do so), it can be difficult to stop them. If the activity is undesirable, then there are techniques that do work, but in the general case it can be quite difficult to convince them to do something else.

      Cats are definitely very social creatures, and are perfectly willing to include humans into their social structure, although admittedly, humans are not counted as cats within this social structure. Feeding them definitely is part of why most domestic cats like their humans, but they do generally enjoy attention by humans.

      Obviously much of the above does not apply well to completely feral cats, although even most feral cats can be domesticated.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    26. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call co-existing of human and housefly exactly peaceful.

    27. Re:Self domesticated by schon · · Score: 1

      Cats do have a strong independent streak. While they are often trainable, it does have a fair bit to do with them being willing to be trained. If they are willing or neutral about the activity being trained, they will be fairly receptive. If they dislike the activity being trained it can be difficult to impossible to train them.

      Everything you said there can be applied to dogs too. It's the exact same elitist claptrap generalization that the GP was spewing.

    28. Re:Self domesticated by nbauman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try petting a squirrel.

      He bit me.

    29. Re:Self domesticated by Vanders · · Score: 1

      I have five cats, and they've always been fed on a schedule. Only one of them is slightly overweight, and that's because of underlying health issues that mean he didn't play much as a kitten/young adult and has fallen in a sedentary lifestyle a little earlier than the others.

      If I tried to leave food out all the time the two youngest would eat everyones before they had a chance.

    30. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting AC because I can't be bothered to register.

      Actually, he is probably right about self-domestication and you need to get your facts up to date. There have been cats found buried alongside humans in neolithic burial sites over 9500 years old in Cyprus, which means man and cat have been living together for a lot longer than originally thought.

    31. Re:Self domesticated by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      Actually, our cats greet us at the door too, and most of the time, they still have plenty of food at the time.

      Yep. Same report here. As I mentioned in another thread, a robot feeds the cats. When the hopper is empty, they alert me to the fact with a special "song and dance".

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    32. Re:Self domesticated by iamhigh · · Score: 1

      Cats on the other hand, just like attention. When training them, you just can NOT punish bad behavior unless it is a serious transgression (knocking over the tv, smothering the baby, etc).

      You are obviously just not kicking them hard enough. Giv'em an extra little umph next time and see if the decide the baby's pacifier is a cat toy again!

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    33. Re:Self domesticated by Nevyn · · Score: 1, Troll

      The absolute worst kind of cat owner is the ones that let kitty roam the neighborhood free. That is wrong and incredibly rude. Kiltty can die or get hurt in tons of ways [outside]

      The absolute worst kind of parent is the one who doesn't lock their child in the basement. That is wrong and incredibly rude. Children can die or get hurt in tons of ways [outside]

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    34. Re:Self domesticated by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      How big was the squirrel? Are you sure it wasn't a rottweiler?

    35. Re:Self domesticated by yabos · · Score: 1

      It depends like everything else, on the individual animal. In general, our cats act more like they're part of the family rather than a slave that obeys commands. Not all dogs are that obedient either. I think it generally has to do with they way both species have evolved. Cats usually live in groups but there isn't really a pack leader, even though they do fight for territory, except with some of the big cats like lions. Dogs generally follow a lead dog in the wild and cats don't. Dogs still follow the pack mentality when living with humans just as cats follow the group living mentality. I don't think this has too much to do with which animal is smarter, rather it's about how it's evolved in the wild.

    36. Re:Self domesticated by jfrankmbl · · Score: 1

      I know you aren't being too serious with this, but I feel a response is somewhat valid in clearing up animal behavior and training.

      While kicking the animal may stop the specific unwanted action, it produces other unwanted actions through aggressive or passive-aggressive behavior. My partner isn't as nice or patient with our cats as I am, and does yell and physically scold them (water spray or midly scruffing them down--not hitting or kicking). They respond by knocking over his water glass on his desk and by clawing up the top of his leather chair.

      On the other hand, I can leave a glass of water on my desk unattended and the top of my chair has 2 puncture locations where they tried clawing once; I firmly told them "No." and then set them aside. I sat around for a few minutes and the next time they looked like they were getting ready to jump up on top of the chair, I picked them up, gave them a treat and pet them for a bit. Repeat a few times and now they know if they want attention from me, they come over to my chair and put their front paws on my thigh and I pick them up.

      Training animals takes patiences and a knowledge of that animal's psychology to anticipate actions they will take so you can modify the behavior BEFORE it goes bad.

      Back on subject of the article, it seems that cats understand this better than humans. They know that negative, plantive meowing is likely to annoy the human and get the cat ejected from the bedroom, so they switch tactics and use something humans respond positively towards (purring), as a base for a sort of Skinnerian training of their human.

      ps - I apologize for the wall of text in my first post. Blame it on giving up coffee and cigs.

    37. Re:Self domesticated by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

      Funny, you don't look like BadAnalogyGuy...

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    38. Re:Self domesticated by littlesparrow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True. You simply have to prove to the cat that it's being given the advantage by 'learning' the appropriate response. For instance, my cat will sit with (I hesitate to say 'command') the right suggestion and hand gesture. But I have to back the suggestion up with food or he gets disappointed I broke the agreement and the next time he will approach the 'sit' suggestion with wariness.

      But he also trains me in return. He likes to drink from the tap, therefore he whines a particular meow until I go over and turn it on for him. I have also heard this baby-noise purr from him. He didn't do it at all until I had another cat, then he seemed to change his purr so I would notice him more. The other cat didn't do this though. Maybe because he was a feral kitten when I got him.

    39. Re:Self domesticated by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      The answer is to make the punishment in no way mistakable for positive attention. The cats in my house know when I am not playing and vanish in short order when they are in trouble. They'll get squirted a few times for something they aren't supposed to do. If that doesn't work they get a thurough soaking with the garden hose. I suppose if either of our cats liked being wet this wouldn't work.

    40. Re:Self domesticated by MrKaos · · Score: 2, Funny

      Try petting a mean rottweiler; I've seen dogs bite their own owners.

      My neighbor had a mean black rottweiler. It used to get out *all* the time bailed all my other neighbors (and me) on our own lawns from time to time and left massive turds on the lawn, and it stank when I opened the door in the morning - thanks neighbor.

      I took to spraying it with the garden hose, and when it growled at me I'd growl right back.

      Eventually everyone in the street got fed up with the dog getting out all the time. The dog turds, that we were gathering up anyway, were collected and deposited in said rottweiler owners letterbox.

      Very soon after the dog was not seen about as often, I guess there are some messages you just can't send via email.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    41. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's bullshit. Try petting a squirrel.

      Try petting a feral cat. I've seen pet squirrels, and they're quite affectionate.

    42. Re:Self domesticated by zacronos · · Score: 1

      Cats will even occasionally approach a human and allow themselves to be petted, but only when it's their idea.

      This highly depends on the cat. Just as there are dogs with more dominant personalities and dogs with less dominant personalities, there are cats on both extremes as well. A very dominant cat will be less tolerant of petting in general (and they will be less tolerant of being licked by other cats), though as you said if it is their idea they will tolerate more of it. On the other hand, a less dominant cat will tolerate petting most of the time even when it is your idea -- their level of enjoyment of petting has more to do with how affectionate they are, rather than how dominant. A dominant cat will rarely let themselves be picked up and held for long, as they don't like the loss of control (I've found they will usually tolerate it longer if I hold out my arm and allow them to stand on my arm and shoulder, as opposed to being held by me. A less dominant cat may not mind the loss of control, and so will tolerate being picked up and held; some less dominant cats that are especially affectionate even seem to appreciate being held (as evidenced by them relaxing into a comfortable position and purring).

      Note that I didn't say that more dominant cats are less friendly, though it may seem so to some people who don't know cats very well. I have one cat who is extremely dominant (and two who are on the other extreme), and when she decides she wants to be affectionate, you just about can't stop her from rubbing against your feet and ankles. And before you say that she is just hungry -- we use a vacation feeder for our cats at all times, so they have access to food whenever they want it. (We are lucky that none of our cats tend to overeat.)

    43. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually parents that let their children roam the neighborhood damaging others property ARE in fact the worst kind of parent.

      but you are being really stupid to see that, maybe if you had a clue and READ his post you might have more than 12 IQ points to rub together.

    44. Re:Self domesticated by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Well, it wasn't an analogy, for one thing!

    45. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Don't forget that cats self-domesticated

      Thing is, cats *aren't* domesticated. They only pretend to be when it suits their purposes.

      If you want to see what domesticated looks like, look at dogs, or horses. Domesticated dogs and horses take their instructions from human masters. Cats, as a rule, don't.

      Cats live *among* humans and coexist more or less peacefully with them, but so do squirrels and houseflies. Cats accept food from humans and even depend on it as their main food source, but so do wild birds that eat at feeders. Cats will even occasionally approach a human and allow themselves to be petted, but only when it's their idea.

      There's a continual argument between people who prefer dogs and people who prefer cats, over which kind of animal is smarter. Of course, there's a great deal of variation in intelligence from one dog to another, and one supposes there may also be from one cat to another, but fundamentally the main reason this argument has never been resolved is because nobody can really demonstrate exactly how smart cats are, because the cats don't cooperate with the study. If you've got a dog, you can find out exactly how smart he is, based on what you can teach him. A monumentally stupid dog can learn about one trick, and then when you try to teach him another, he either can't figure it out or forgets the first one. On the other end of the scale, the most intelligent dog I've ever known recognized an English vocabulary of several hundred words and understood SVO sentence order. With a dog, you can find out exactly how smart he is, because he'll cooperate with the whole exercise. A dog is a social animal. His whole life is focused around *you*. A cat is altogether a different beast. A cat does what it wants, when it wants. You can try to teach it stuff, but as a rule the cat doesn't cooperate, so you can never really be sure what it's learned and what it hasn't.

      Cats for one are way more intelligent than dogs cats dont need anyone to look after them they do it themselfs they for the most part cover the droppings and definatley dont leave it in the middle of the 6th fairway just where your ball always land . Cats are very trainable comming froma family that has never been without cats i know they are also obedieant (SP) to a large degree one of our more recent cats would want feeding and come with the silent meow routine tell him to go sit down and off he went and did just that sat down and waited till he was called .

      I still have 2 cats and will never be without at least one they are great company and unlike dogs they dont stink the place out you can walk into a house that has dogs and bang instantly it hits you .

      Cats are good at latching onto something that has the desired effect one of mine at the moment will have a couple of goes at meowing in the morning if that fails it's onto my chest and lick and then a tweak on the nose for me for the cheek of ignoring her in the first place i did not teach her that she worked it out for herself

    46. Re:Self domesticated by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      You are preaching to the choir here. I think the world would be much more peaceful and quiet if all parents locked their kids in the basement. Especially when I am going out to spend $150 on a nice dinner.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    47. Re:Self domesticated by tixxit · · Score: 1

      Cats are definitely very social creatures, and are perfectly willing to include humans into their social structure, although admittedly, humans are not counted as cats within this social structure. Feeding them definitely is part of why most domestic cats like their humans, but they do generally enjoy attention by humans.

      I think cats actually see their owners as a mother/caregiver. When it comes to their owners, the behaviour cats display is much more akin to how they act with their mother, then how they act with other cats. They also certainly like human companionship and actively seek it out. Cats will follow their owners all over the house. Most of the time, my cat is on the couch when I'm watching TV, and in my bed when I'm asleep. Usually he doesn't want attention, and will actively let you know so if you try to give it to him (gets up, moves 1 foot away, then sits down again). He just wants to sit near me.

    48. Re:Self domesticated by Anspen · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you O'm curious. What is elitist about the GP?

    49. Re:Self domesticated by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I would have put it in a paper bag, set it on his porch, set the bag on fire and rang the doorbell. That'd teach him!

    50. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try petting a european wild cat(felis silvestris silvestris)

    51. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kind of/sort of agree with that. I've only seen one person train a cat and he trained it to do one thing.. use the human toilet and flush it. When he told me about it I didn't believe it but I was lucky enough to witness the event one time. The cat actually got on the toilet, crapped and then pushed the lever to flush!

      In some ways I still don't believe it but somehow he managed to do it.

    52. Re:Self domesticated by NotBorg · · Score: 1

      I think canned cat food is to blame. Unlike dry cat food from the bag, it must be prepared by a human (removed from the can) and it's best when fresh from the can (it can't sit out as long as dry food can). This leads to the cats eating on a schedule convenient for humans.

      Also, by feeding them canned food, the human is often paying attention to the cat while it is eating. If the cat doesn't immediately start eating and "pigging out," the owner assumes the cat "doesn't like that kind" and finds a different kind that makes the cat exhibit the behavior the human expects. This is not always beneficial to the cat's health either.

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    53. Re:Self domesticated by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Dogs have owners.
      Cats have staff.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    54. Re:Self domesticated by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The first cat we had was a feral cat. One I have now was feral, but I got it as a kitten so it probably doesn't count, but it's the most affactionate of the three!

    55. Re:Self domesticated by Creepy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most people do some training of their cats - I don't know of many cats that do their business, say, on the couch rather than in a litter box.

      I admit, I personally have never trained one, but that has more to do with allergies... my scratch test was so severe that it overran about half the other tests and ran over my shoulder (I maxed the scale and then some). Basically, cat spit=fatality for me (and yes, it is their saliva that causes the allergic reaction, not their hair as is popularly believed). Heck, I have allergic reactions to people that have come into contact with cats (which is practically everybody).

    56. Re:Self domesticated by mcvos · · Score: 1

      My cat could recognise a couple of phrases. He could recognise his own name, of course (I tested if it wasn't just the tone of my voice by calling a different name in the same tone, and he looked at me as if saying: "who are you calling? there's nobody else here"), and he always obeyed "on the floor", which I'd say whenever I found him on a table or kitchen counter. He quickly learned he wasn't allowed on the kitchen counter if I was nearby (they're like overtrained neural networks), and he'd obediently jump off the table whenever I told him to. And then he'd jump on the table again until I (immediately) told him to get off again.

      Cats are smart in a really stupid way. Or stupid in a really clever way.

    57. Re:Self domesticated by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      So, if your cat meows a lot, don't yell at him or squirt him because he then will continue to meow--he thinks you are talking or playing with him.

      On the other hand, a soft air pistol convinced our cat to stay off the $#!()% counters when no amount of more gentle convincing was having any effect.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    58. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly wrong, my friend. Some cats are entirely trainable, as much as any dog/monkey/horse/bird/mongoose.
      I find the "clicker" reward method the easiest place to start from, and I got it working in 5 days with my adopted strays.

      Maybe you just smell like a dog.

    59. Re:Self domesticated by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Actually, our cats greet us at the door too, and most of the time, they still have plenty of food at the time. They're actually very sociable.

      My cat used to really miss me. When I was away, he say at the door meowing pathetically. He loved to hang around me, but he was scared of strangers, always hiding under the bed.

      In fact, my cat had some serious personality development during his life. When he was young, he was scared and timid, especially when he got a personality clash with the downstairs neighbour's husband. He was her cat until that time. I got him after he couldn't live with her husband anymore. During his stay with me, he very slowly got a bit more confident, until eventually (after many years) he was confident enough to walk through the room while there were strangers.

      Eventually (because I got a project abroad) I found him another home where two other cats already lived. He quickly became the dominant cat there, and aparently even terrorised some other cats in that area.

    60. Re:Self domesticated by djfuq · · Score: 0

      People who feed their cats at certain times of the day and let the cats starve at all other times seem to be the same people who believe this nonsense.

      My cats always have food as I give them a huge bowl of it, and they eat at their leisure so food is just ubiquitous in my house. My cats behave as if they were my friends and don't exhibit this Stockholm syndrome like need for you to feed them as you mention.

      People who think dogs are smarter seem to like to give "orders" and like having their orders "obeyed". I think this is silly as I feel an intelligent animal wont follow orders unless they WANT to.

      My cats come to me when I whistle, greet me at the door after work, lay on my belly when im bummed out, are entertaining guests in my house, and they are treated with the utmost respect.

      Dogs are just big happy needy retarded children compliant by force and bribery/trickery.

      Their neediness is what really turns me off....

       

      --
      Dj fuQ [url="http://djfuq.org"]djfuq urges you to listen to the beats[/url] [url="http://djfuq.org"]http://djfuq.org[
    61. Re:Self domesticated by LeneJ · · Score: 1

      I think there is something to this. My cat has dry food ALWAYS in her bowl, and she couldn't care less about it. She will eat it when she's hungry, but otherwise it's like "you call this food?" She doesn't care much for cans any more, I have to feed her pouch food. And just not ANY pouch food, no, she wants the kind that is 90 cents or higher a meal. I have also found that she will eat her food if I stand there and watch her! If I don't, she will eat what she needs and then leave.

      I have changed my behaviour to her eating habits. She now gets the pouch in the morning only, and she darn better eat the dry food at night, or she will have to starve until the morning after (as said, the dry food is always there). But, she is so darn cute, and she makes this cutest little yelp while stretching up towards me, it is SO hard to say no to her. *sigh* She's trained me really well...

      --
      Un paio di scarpe, per favore!
    62. Re:Self domesticated by fm6 · · Score: 1

      "Domestication" doesn't imply "obedience", as any mule skinner will tell you. It just means that you have a population of animals (or plants!) that have lived with humans long enough to be physically distinct from their wild ancestors.

    63. Re:Self domesticated by Prune · · Score: 1

      I remember during my undergrad in USF (the Tampa one, not SF) eating some popcorn while sitting on a bench in campus. Two squirrels came up to get some of the popcorn I had dropped on the ground. The problem is that they started fighting over it, surprisingly viciously, right around my legs. One managed to jump on my bare ankle and sink it's teeth--deep enough that I couldn't stop the bleeding and had to go to the campus clinic. The doctor said that in his 15 years working there, I'm the only one to have come after being attacked by squirrels.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    64. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're correct, it isn't that difficult at all. It begins with the human understanding that cats see us as peers not masters. Cats are not pack animals but solitary. Once we understand this, we know that a cat's motivation is different as they are indifferent to punishment. A cat responds very well to pleasure, so by providing a pleasurable experience as a way of training, your cat is more apt to pay close attention and do what you would like. I was able to teach my cats not to claw up the carpet or furniture using such methods.

    65. Re:Self domesticated by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that cats self-domesticated

      That's just a clever way of saying cats domesticated humans rather than vice versa.

    66. Re:Self domesticated by akzeac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My youngest cat is not de-clawed as it is a experiment.

      Are you implying that you did declaw all your other cats? Are you aware of how much amputating your cat can hurt them?

      I think you have the wrong idea about what being the "absolute worst kind of cat owner" constitutes.

    67. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Horses are NOT domesticated! If you've ever spent two minutes with a horse, you'd see this. You can train and train and train, and yet, the moment your back is turned it'll bite you! Pecking order is too finely ingrained in the mind of a horse, so they constantly seek to prove dominance over you. That, and their hyper flight response means they'll return to a stupid, scared feral beast the moment a plastic bag drifts past their field.

    68. Re:Self domesticated by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      If your children start mucking around in my yard or leaving dead animal carcasses lying around, you can be damned sure I'll demand you keep them locked up.

      Besides, a child, being an intelligent human being, is far less likely to get killed by a coyote or a motorist. This happens to cats regularly. And, of course, idiots who let their cats roam around are often the same idiots who don't get their cats fixed, which means lots of little cats that have to be taken in by the local humane society.

      Sorry, buddy, anyone who lets their cat roam around free is an idiot, plain and simple. If you're one of those people, then you, too, are an idiot.

    69. Re:Self domesticated by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      collected and deposited in said rottweiler owners letterbox

      If a letter box is where the postal worker deposits mail, I believe it's a federal offense to put things in there without postage (or somesuch requirement). At least in the US.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    70. Re:Self domesticated by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Self domesticated? are you nuts?

      Actually, as I understand it, cats originally started hanging around villages in the fertile crescent simply because there was food available. Eventually, people started taking them in to their homes because, well, gosh darn it, they're cute.

      So, yeah, cats are more or less self-domesticated, in the sense that humans didn't really go out of their way to tame them, as they are, quite frankly, useless as far as domesticates go: Unlike dogs, cattle, and so forth, because cats don't have a social hierarchy, thus humans can't insert themselves as the alpha, which means cats are more difficult to control (yes, it *can* be done, but the hierarchical nature of other domesticates makes it a lot easier). Meanwhile, unlike other domesticates, cats have no obvious utility, aside from maybe local pest control (dog == hunting partner, cattle, goats, etc, are sources of meat, milk, and physical labour, etc).

      For more information on this topic, read "Guns, Germs, and Steel".

    71. Re:Self domesticated by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Typically I look at cat owners as morons owned by a cat.

      You are one of the few I've heard from that I'll say is a cat owner.

      Treat a cat like you're the boss and it will respect you and act sane. Let a cat realize that you're a pushover and it will be the boss. Its not really the cats fault, its just that 99 times out of a 100, the cat IS smarter than the owner.

      Congratulations for being that 1 person out of a 100 who is actually smarter than their cat :)

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    72. Re:Self domesticated by eclectic4 · · Score: 2

      "I don't know of many cats that do their business, say, on the couch rather than in a litter box."

      Most cats do this instinctually. We've had many cats (kittens, newborns) over the years, and I've never had to "train" them to do so. Just an FYI.

      However, we HAVE been able to train a few to do some things, like retrieve a toy, etc...

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    73. Re:Self domesticated by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      So ... your cats have you trained pretty well it looks like.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    74. Re:Self domesticated by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      If you want to see what domesticated looks like, look at dogs, or horses. Domesticated dogs and horses take their instructions from human masters. Cats, as a rule, don't.

      Cats take instructions from their human masters JUST FINE. The problem is that most cat owners aren't the masters. Half of them think of cats as an equal, so the end result is the cat runs the house because the owner is stupid.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    75. Re:Self domesticated by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      It's not that difficult to train a human, either*. Most humans don't bother ;)

        * Children being the required exception to that rule.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    76. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody can really demonstrate exactly how smart cats are, because the cats don't cooperate with the study.

      Hmm, right. That would be assuming cats have the intelligence to choose whether or not they wish to cooperate. I could claim the same things of earthworms.

      Sorry, but Occam's razor dictates that if an animal does not show signs of intelligence, it is because it is not intelligent. Not that it "chose" to not show prowess while the cameras where rolling.

    77. Re:Self domesticated by Miaowara_Tomokato · · Score: 1

      Funny, mine does that exact same thing (shower off, within 30 seconds there's a cat on the toilet), except it was all his idea and I'M the one that learned that scratching him then means I'm left alone to dress.

      Yes, I was certainly trained by a cat.

    78. Re:Self domesticated by sporkmonger · · Score: 1

      Ok, so then why do cheetahs, which are most certainly not domesticated, also do this? Their purr is a bit more like a jackhammer, and the cry doesn't sound at all like a baby, but they do it.

    79. Re:Self domesticated by Aerosiecki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't train a cat, you teach a cat. That's the difference.

      --

      Cherish. Live. Dream.
    80. Re:Self domesticated by audunr · · Score: 1

      You're right. At least in Soviet Russia it can be done.

      I remember reading that they took cats they found on the street and trained them. Only thing was they had to figure out what the cat wanted to do instead of teaching them some random trick, because that wouldn't work.

    81. Re:Self domesticated by baegucb · · Score: 1

      My wife found out what keeps our cats off the counter and tables. A swat with a newspaper (not rolled up). It's more the sound that gets them running. Once we'd done this for awhile, whenever there is behaviour I want stopped, I just have to reach for the nearest paper and make some sound from it.

    82. Re:Self domesticated by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Maybe he wanted to know what a prune tasted like.

    83. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > My youngest cat is not de-clawed as it is a experiment.

      What?! Boy, am I glad that declawing cats is abolished in germany. And most of Europe.

      > The absolute worst kind of cat owner is the ones that let kitty roam the neighborhood free.

      I cannot take you seriously. There is nothing, absolutely *nothing* wrong with freedom. Cat haters? Where the heck do you come from? I could understand if you lived in a big city, but only just *maybe*.

      Tammej

    84. Re:Self domesticated by Schadrach · · Score: 2

      The litter box thing is more a matter of giving them something that makes following instinct more convenient for them. Cats generally prefer to bury their waste. You give a cat a box of something sandy and easy to dig through where nothing else is, and it doesn't take much to get them to use it. My current kitty it literally amounted to setting him in the litter box once when we first brought him home. He only failed to use it twice after that, once was the first time someone carried him upstairs (personally I think he just didn't know how to find his box since he was half asleep in someone's arms when he went up) and the other time he locked himself in a bathroom, went on the rug beside the tub, and tried to bury it with the rug (he got it folded over -- close enough, I guess).

    85. Re:Self domesticated by SterlingSylver · · Score: 1

      According to my fiancee, who works in the critical care ward of a local animal hospital, the answer is that dogs are more intelligent while cats have more "intelligent" instincts. The dogs in the hospital will actively plot, problem-solve, and scheme to get their way. The cats, however, will more or less react predictably based on their instincts. In non-strenuous situations (because the CC unit is not a happy place), those cat instincts come across as intelligent.

    86. Re:Self domesticated by Tanman · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Go to the circus.

    87. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My youngest cat is not de-clawed as it is a experiment."

      Sorry but WTF? where I live de-clawing would be considered abuse of an animal and illegal. Is this a normal procedure somewhere?
      Why would anyone de-claw a cat? All cat's can be trained to not claw furniture etc, and I have yet to see a domesticated cat to be dangerous because of their claws.

      Top Reasons NOT to Declaw a Cat

    88. Re:Self domesticated by Faerunner · · Score: 1

      Not really. Most training I have seen uses elements of conditioning (rewarding expected behaviors and punishing undesirable ones) because that's what works best. I can't say I know every pet training method under the sun, but the base fact is that most creatures will work for a motivating item, be that praise, toys, treats, or in some cases even being left alone. In fact, I wouldn't have a clue how to train an animal without offering it motivation for the desired behavior.

    89. Re:Self domesticated by plisskin · · Score: 1

      When camping one time at a semi remote location (3 hr hike in up a mountain) the squirrels there were used to humans enough to crawl inside my shorts pocket to get at some sunflower seeds I was eating (and tossing a few to him or her). I almost tried petting it but was a little too concerned for my own set of nuts in said shorts. Probably wouldn't take too much to get him to allow me to pet it though. I would think that a baby squirrel raised by humans wouldn't have a problem with this.

    90. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I've trained my cat to come when called. It wasn't hard... however... as part of the training we had to try different names so effectively our cat "chose" it's name. As I think about it I suppose I *can't* say I've trained my cat. Instead I guess my cat taught me it's name.

    91. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bullshit.

      For instance: Just today my sister let our cat lick some of her yoghurt and less than half an hour later said cat laid a dead - but still warm - mouse to her feet. This goes beyond domestication, this is a sense of gratefulness.

    92. Re:Self domesticated by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Call me when you survive a major attack by a Maine Coon with only a few scratches as you consider all cats harmless.

      That breed is the size of a bobcat or a medium sized dog, and fools that have that breed and treat it like the tiny tabby they own are in for trouble when they freak out on you. Having that cat clawed is a major risk. My sister in law's last boyfriend needed 24 stitches in his arms and face when her Maine Coon attacked him. It's a wonderful breed, they are really cool cats and very calm if the owners are responsible and train them well and treat them well. (Note: if your idiot friends tease the cat enough, kitty will take them out as in this case)

      A decalwed cat is forever an indoor cat, and yes some cats do in fact need to be de-clawed. Some dumber breeds cant be trained to not destroy the furniture and you either need to banish them to a cage when gone, and many many pet owners are simply incredibly lazy and decide to not want to waste time training.

      Why would anyone declaw a cat? Typically because they are lazy, or in the case of behavior that cant be changed (yes that happens, try and retrain a cat that pisses everywhere), it's a choice of Kill the kitty or declaw it.

      Thus is what happened to my older cat. She is a rescued cat, we could not stop the destruction behavior so we have 3 choices. Cage kitty for her life, Kill it, De-claw it.

      I chose the most nefarious and EVIL approach and declawed it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    93. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The cat I have is a domestic short-hair and she can be pretty stubborn. My girlfriend thought I was crazy for trying to train her to sit before receiving a treat. I did not think much of it because as a child we trained all of our pets this way. While it was indeed difficult, and took many weeks, now my girlfriend sits on command every time.

    94. Re:Self domesticated by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I firmly agree. If your kid is trashing my yard and property, Lock that little bastard in the basement.

      I have yet to see a cat that does not piss all over my bushes, Kill all the Fish in my pond for fun (Housecats are the only animal that kills for sport) or leave turds in my kids sandbox.

        I do see lots of flattened kitties with collars on the roads around here. Luckily, My community is smart and requires licensing of cats and gives a $150.00 fine for letting your cat out unleashed. More and more communities are passing these laws to stop irresponsible people from letting their cats roam the neighborhoods. So I hope the number of flattened kitties in the streets will drop.

      P.S. The local animal control set cat traps They also pay residents $5.00 for every live and unharmed cat they bring in that they trap themselves. Feral cats in cities and suburbs is a huge problem.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    95. Re:Self domesticated by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It's just my opinion but I always thought cats were smarter - at least when untrained.

      Untrained cats open cupboards, even doors, strategically place themselves at doors to run out at the moment it's opened when they know they should be indoors, hide under objects where they know humans can't reach when they don't want to be picked up, generally will do anything short of picking locks to get into some sweet, sweet mischief.

      Untrained dogs, when chained to an object, walk around it in circles until the chain is wrapped around the object many times and the dog is "stuck" close to the object, then howl hopelessly until a human helps them out.

      No competition IMO.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    96. Re:Self domesticated by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      Heh. My mom has a stupid dog, and a smart dog.

      And a stupid cat, and a smart cat.

      I like to think that happened so that they cancel each other out.

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    97. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you mutilate animals to suit your need to keep a furry lump caged inside your house? In my life I have known a great many cats, including a couple who lived feral for the first few years of their lives - none of them needed to be declawed. And in my opinion owners who keep their cats locked inside are the worst kind, how exceptionally selfish to have an animal so restricted just because you need some kind of emotional crutch. You talk about the ease of training of cats, it's true - you should try it instead of disfiguring them. Buy a garden plant hand sprayer and squirt the cat with water every time it misbehaves, they will soon learn.

    98. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my country we do not declaw cats. It's just unheard of. What the fuck is up with you yanks?

    99. Re:Self domesticated by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      I assume that by "self-domesticated" you mean "they just moved in". Yeah, that's accurate.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    100. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of Eddie Izzard's bit about Pavlov's Cat Experments:

      Day 1: Rang bell, cat fucked off.
      Day 2: Rang bell, cat went and answered door.
      Day 3: Rang bell, cat said he had eaten earlier.
      Day 4: Went to ring bell, but cat had stolen batteries.
      Day 5: Went and rang bell with new batteries, but cat put his paw on bell so it only made a thunk noise. Then cat rang his own bell.
      I ate food.

    101. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, show your cat who's boss. And your hamster and pet lizard too.

      You are more full of macho bullshit than an arab pimp.

    102. Re:Self domesticated by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      With a dog, you can find out exactly how smart he is, because he'll cooperate with the whole exercise. A dog is a social animal. His whole life is focused around *you*. A cat is altogether a different beast. A cat does what it wants, when it wants.

      I'm afraid that's a false generalization. I once had a dog who was very smart, but not at all cooperative. If I tried to play "fetch" with her, she'd run and get the stick the first time I threw it, and drop it at my feet. When I threw it again, she'd sit there and look at me like I was an idiot. She'd do it the first time to show she was smart enough to get what I wanted, but she wouldn't do it again because she thought it was a really dumb game that involved her doing all the work.

      This dog did all kinds of amazing things, like find her way to me across a town she'd never been before. One night I got angry at her and said, "Get lost!". I never saw her again.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    103. Re:Self domesticated by LordEd · · Score: 1

      That's not a squirrel. Its a møøse, Very majestic.

    104. Re:Self domesticated by Prune · · Score: 1

      Actually short for Prunesquallor, after Mervyn Peake's character in Gormenghast.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    105. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of my cats have never been declawed. They are all very sweet and docile, will let me bathe them without much trouble (they whine and try to creep out of the tub), and have never bit hard while playing. They scratch sometimes, but that's because I forgot to trim their claws and they are used to dealing with me with duller claws.

    106. Re:Self domesticated by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      The absolute worst kind of cat owner is the ones that let kitty roam the neighborhood free. That is wrong and incredibly rude. Kiltty can die or get hurt in tons of ways many a cat hater leaves out bowls of antifreeze to kill kitties that enter their yard, and letting them piss and crap all over the neighborhood is simply being a jerk.

      Yeah this is why I love cats, but I'm not a big fan of other cat owners. I've lived in three rental properties over three years, and at two out of the three we've had problems with other idiot's cats. Back when I lived with my parents I lost three cats to the fact that there were allowed outside overnight / not allowed to stay inside (Father's orders ... "You can just get another cat" ... enough said), so now that I'm part of the control system, myself and my wife only let our cats outside under full supervision. But we've had issues with other people's cats constantly. One of our cats was attacked by someone elses cat that had come into our yard, and that was one of two cats that would sit at our windows and freak out out cats in our own home. We had another male cat on heat piss on our door and car because we have two female cats. We had a party once, with the back doors open the whole day (the cats were locked in a back room), and a neighbours cat came into our house and slept on our couch and loitered around our porch for the next two days. We were nearly going to keep it, but then it just up and left. I don't have a hard time imagining that it was someone that had gone on a weekend holiday and decided to leave the cat outside the whole time. Pathetic.

      But the worst I ever heard was a friend whose cat's neck was broken by a neighbour and just chucked back over the fence. I consider it rude to let your cat run free in other people's yards, but short of throwing screwed up bits of foil or trying to hit them with the hose or simply running at them to scare them away, I would never hurt someone elses cat, regardless of how big a jerk the owners are.

      I do find it amazing, and quite disturbing that it's seemingly quite acceptable and humourous to talk about killing or hurting cats, maybe it's a 'manly' thing, I don't know, but for all the "Lost your cat? Check my tyres" and "The only good cat is a flat cat" car stickers I've never seen any that suggest hurting dogs.

    107. Re:Self domesticated by DrCode · · Score: 1

      Got to agree with all the above.

      My own experience is with two cats, and it seems obvious that one is far smarter than the other. The smart one is adept at leading me to what she wants, whether it's food, water, or being let outside. If she's outside and wants in, she's able to find the closest entrance or window where she can get my attention. She also avoids doing things I don't like, such as jumping on the dining-table (at least while I'm around). If I find her there, I just have to say, quietly, 'Get off the table,' and she does so.

      The other one: Dumb as a post. Just yowls when she wants something, without giving a clue to what it is. I constantly have to lead her to the food to let her know that it's there. Constantly gets herself stuck on the roof for hours before figuring out that she can get down the same way she got up.

    108. Re:Self domesticated by acwebguy · · Score: 1

      From my experience, hitting them with an air bazooka was a pretty effective negative re-enforcement...

    109. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Children being the required exception to that rule.

      Ummm.... http://xkcd.com/573/

    110. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Positive reinforcement is used in dog training too. Though, since dogs are just a *tad* more eager to please their owners, as they are more social animals, it is about 1000x easier to accomplish.

      Hell, I've trained fish in an aquarium before (oscars... very smart). Still have not been able to train a cat to do any "tricks" of any sort. Although, they do need training not to claw up the carpet, furniture, table legs, doors, etc. Usually just requires giving them something easier to claw up. Stubborn bastards.

    111. Re:Self domesticated by mldi · · Score: 1

      Dogs are just big happy needy retarded children compliant by force and bribery/trickery.
      Their neediness is what really turns me off....


      I take it by your ignorance of how varied breeds are that you are one of those elitists that likes to claim that, just because they have a stubborn animal, they're SO much smarter than everything else. Would you call a mule smarter than a horse? Horses are much more trainable. Mules are smart? No. Are dolphins stupid? No.

      Your logic on the situation is lacking.

      But going back to dogs... really, there's a breed for almost everybody. If you want an aloof independent creature like a cat, there are tons of dog breeds out there that fit the bill. Try a Pekingese or a Basenji. I've had experience with Basenjis and I can testify to how "proper" and civilized they are. Incredibly smart, they hate messes, and are extremely independent. As a bonus, they will bark at intruders, where a cat will cover it's own ass and run like a little chickenshit, which makes a Basenji more dependable when you actually need them.

      And yes, dogs will go in a litter box too.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    112. Re:Self domesticated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And God said: there shall be cats. And he saw that it was good. And then it took a little while (~6000 years) until God decided there should be LOLcats also. Let's wait and see what God has planed for us in the future (or maybe he is still thinking about it)

    113. Re:Self domesticated by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I think the subject is common house cats, not cougars.

    114. Re:Self domesticated by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think they give out psychology Ph.D.'s in cereal boxes (and judging by most of them I've known, probably only the cereal boxes at asylums).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    115. Re:Self domesticated by xmvince · · Score: 1

      dumping water on my cat quickly taught it not to meow loudly in the morning. thing kept waking me up so I kept a bucket of water next to my bed. after about 2-3 days of dumping water on it until it shut up seemed to do the trick perfectly.

    116. Re:Self domesticated by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, unlike other domesticates, cats have no obvious utility, aside from maybe local pest control

      You think "pest control" is not useful? Then you've never lived in a place that was infested with mice or rats. Cats were once essential to any rural household (and very useful in the barn as well) because they are able to perform this one function that you think so negligible.

      Heck, my house used to be crawling with "palmetto bugs" (Texan for for "giant cockroaches so big you could saddle up and ride them"). They live outside, but come into the house to forage. After I got a couple of cats, I never saw one of the monsters again. And the cats are getting remarkably fat...

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    117. Re:Self domesticated by xmvince · · Score: 1

      huh? are you trying to compare locking a child in the basement and keeping a cat indoors? children grow up and learn not to cross the street. cats are curious animals and love to cross the street. that fact voids your analogy

    118. Re:Self domesticated by xmvince · · Score: 1

      my cat makes me smoke him up too :( goes thru all my weed in only a few hours

    119. Re:Self domesticated by xmvince · · Score: 1

      They only purr normally when you aren't listening.

    120. Re:Self domesticated by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      You think "pest control" is not useful? Then you've never lived in a place that was infested with mice or rats.

      I'm not saying it isn't useful. But humans had no need to domesticate cats to receive that function. They simply put up with them roaming around their villages and eating the vermin that they attracted. At best, it was a simple symbiotic relationship.

      Domestication of dogs, cattle, and other livestock were necessary to make use of them. Hunting dogs have to be bred and trained. Feed cattle need to be bred for size, milk production capacity, strength, and docility. The list goes on. But cats were never selectively bred by humans for the purpose of utilizing them as tools. They were simply tolerated, and eventually taken into the home for reasons we may never know.

    121. Re:Self domesticated by Rynd · · Score: 1

      There are many methods for training horses that don't involve breaking them, which is cruel.

  5. Huh??? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have never in my whole life experienced a purr that had ANY recognizable component of "baby cry" in it. Further, purring does not prompt me to do anything for the cat... with the cats I have known, it has always been a sign that they were already content.

    1. Re:Huh??? by Nomaxxx · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have never in my whole life experienced a purr that had ANY recognizable component of "baby cry" in it.

      It's not said that it sounds like a baby cry but only that it's on the same frequency.

    2. Re:Huh??? by Kligat · · Score: 2, Informative

      From another report from LiveScience, I gather that it would be most recognizable to you as being called just a "baby cry," but with a subtle sound the same as cats make when purring mixed in, rather than as purring with a crying sound, but the language is utterly ambiguous and it seems hard to distinguish when they mean meowing, purring, or whatever.

    3. Re:Huh??? by Inda · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I would love to hear a cat cry. Maybe I'm flushing it down wrong?

      Cats: why do people love them so much?

      They shit on my garden. They shit on the food I intend serving my family. Their buried shit, when covered in dirt, looks just like a dry lump of clay or a big stone - if I pick one up again, with my finger, by mistake...

      The kill the birds in my garden. Little birds, big bird, young and old, they do not care. They kill for pleasure, not for food. They are evil.

      They dug up the squash I had growing on an old compost heap. Why? Why not sleep somewhere else?

      They put dirty footprint on my car. You wouldn't catch any other animal doing that.

      I've heard that Lilies and its pollen can poisonous to cats. Maybe this'll keep them away... for good.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    4. Re:Huh??? by Nomaxxx · · Score: 1

      Agree.

    5. Re:Huh??? by Neil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The BBC report that I heard on the radio this morning didn't suggest that the "soliciting purr" sounded recognizably like a baby's cry - but if you stick a recording of it through a spectrum analyzer you find that it has some of the same frequency components as a baby cry embedded in it. So the sound puts humans on edge and plays on their subconscious in such a way that they want to satisfy the cat and make it stop.

    6. Re:Huh??? by John+Betonschaar · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      People: why do people love them so much?

      I really feel sad for you if the stuff going on in your life is really so insignificant that you start getting aggrevated about cats littering in your garden, killing the occasional bird and getting paw prints on your beloved car. You do realize that garden soil is full of dead bugs and excrements, composted plants, and that you will get your hands dirty when gardening anyway? That birds also get killed by hitting cars, trains or airplanes or simply by falling out of the nest, and that parking your car under the wrong tree also makes it dirty?

      The moment you start getting sincerly bothered and aggrevated about trivialities like that, that you start hating cats for it, is the moment you should figure out something is missing in your life. You'd better not have any kids if you feel that way, they can be extremely annoying at times as well.

    7. Re:Huh??? by gtall · · Score: 1

      theRegister has this story and a link, http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/cmvcr/Domestic%20cats.html. I have two female Siamese, Tinkerbell has this purr behavior and Ariel doesn't yet they are litter mates. Ariel manipulates me in other ways that Tinkerbell doesn't. They do seem to put an effort into the manipulation.

    8. Re:Huh??? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      getting aggrevated about cats littering in your garden, [...] You do realize that garden soil is full of dead bugs and excrements, composted plants, and that you will get your hands dirty when gardening anyway?

      Cat excrement and urine is packed full of ammonia, which can kill a lot of flowers sensitive to soil PH (especially since cats tend to use the same spot many times). For avid gardeners who spend hours each day, a cat's 30 second midnight visit can ruin lots of effort.

    9. Re:Huh??? by Jammet · · Score: 1

      You don't have to think of it as 'exploiting' a human, like pushing a button. They may simply really -be- happy. Or the opposite, they could be upset. Some cats may do this just to manipulate. But there as many different characters among cats as there are cats. Just like with dogs and humans. Even if it's a subtle difference or barely noticeable without years of knowing one another.

      --
      Leopard cub
    10. Re:Huh??? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "... this sound incorporates a 'cry,' with a similar frequency to a human baby's..."

      Seems pretty clear to me.

    11. Re:Huh??? by Calithulu · · Score: 1

      My trick has been to lay small patches of chicken wire between the plants. Cats hate to step on it and it is easy enough to pick up and move out of the way as needed. Not ideal, but I don't think banning cat ownership is workable...

    12. Re:Huh??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They put dirty footprint on my car. You wouldn't catch any other animal doing that.

      Wrong. Other animals I've seen do that include dogs, raccoons, and goats.

    13. Re:Huh??? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      I have. There's a neighbor's cat that every now and then makes me look out the window and think "who left a baby outside? Oh, it's just that cat again."
      But I haven't heard that in a while. Oh well, maybe a coyote had a nice dinner. Cats don't last around here.

    14. Re:Huh??? by Faerunner · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: Motion sensor set to turn on a sprinkler head. No cat in its right mind will use your garden as a litterbox after the 2nd time they've been surprised by cold water, and the noise/surprise of the water might keep other pest animals away as well.

  6. Just read this on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://scienceblogs.com/notrocketscience/2009/07/cats_manipulate_their_owners_with_a_cry_embedded_in_a_purr.php linked by another slashdot article. I mean, within a hop I think of another article.

  7. Bad hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I assume I have bad hardware as I never respond to any kind of cat purring, or wait, maybe I have dog version of hardware.

    Anyway now I think I might have been exploited by puppy eyes like in the movies.

  8. So... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    are cats poised to take over the world? Or is the exploitation thing only limited to catfood?

    1. Re:So... by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      The cats will take over the world AND divert it's resources to providing cat food?

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    2. Re:So... by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Soylent Green Cat Food is PEOPLE!!!!!!!

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:So... by bmo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have a friend who is breeding cats for opposable thumbs and larger brains.

      Forget Skynet.

      We're done for.

      --
      BMO

    4. Re:So... by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dare I ask, breeding with other cats, or with humans? The last thing we need is a human-cat hybrid. They'd probably make the purrfect advisary.

    5. Re:So... by fridaynightsmoke · · Score: 1

      are cats poised to take over the world?

      No they won't, deep down they're just pussies...

      --
      This is a substitute for a clever sig that fits within the maximum number of characters.
    6. Re:So... by jimicus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I doubt it. If you did that, you'd wind up with an animal with an amazing sense of smell but also a tendency to get distracted by expensive suits.

    7. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or more likely a retarded furry.

    8. Re:So... by Smivs · · Score: 1

      Dare I ask, breeding with other cats, or with humans? The last thing we need is a human-cat hybrid. They'd probably make the purrfect advisary.

      Catwoman!

    9. Re:So... by nick79au · · Score: 1, Funny

      If Red Dwarf has taught me anything it is that human-cat hybrids can be defeated by a full length mirror and a rack of horrible suits

    10. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they already had a breed like this... I think the scientific name is women.

    11. Re:So... by funkatron · · Score: 1
      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    12. Re:So... by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Informative

      Soylent Green Cat Food is PEOPLE!!!!!!!

      The cats won't mind that; size is likely the only reason you're seen as a provider and not prey. Go jump in the nearest lion enclosure if you think otherwise. ;-)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    13. Re:So... by RulerOf · · Score: 1

      If real furries were out in the wild, I imagine 4chan would become even stranger.

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    14. Re:So... by arethuza · · Score: 1

      Charlie Stross has a novel (Accelerando I think) that features a mind evolved from an uploaded cat. Consider how awful that would be! I'd take Skynet any day - at least it would be quick.

    15. Re:So... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's the one ;)

    16. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Khajiit has no time for you.

    17. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, they would probably get stuck in the daily rat race.

    18. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be Leslie Fish or is there MORE THAN ONE person doing this?

      suddenly twice as scared.

    19. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't calling a furry retarded redundant?

    20. Re:So... by gtall · · Score: 1

      Let's not bring managers into this.

    21. Re:So... by Gorbag · · Score: 1
      --
      -- I speak only for myself
    22. Re:So... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, then it's already been done. It explains Pat Robertson and Bernard Madhof.

    23. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That one would also explain why lions don't purr.

    24. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I, for one, welcome our new feline overlords.

    25. Re:So... by castorvx · · Score: 1

      Indeed, a friend of mine who works as an EMT once mentioned that a common phenomenon EMTs encounter when discovering a human corpse that has been left alone with their pets for any sizable amount of time is that the cats will literally eat their owner's face.

      Keep that in mind the next time your cat is rubbing up against you. It's just waiting. :(

    26. Re:So... by Anonymous+Matt · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who is breeding cats for opposable thumbs and larger brains.

      I see it's time to seek funding for my new MMO concept. I call it World of Roarcraft. It's all about cats.

    27. Re:So... by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Actually all cat can purr but the big cats (lions, tigers, leopards, jaguars) can only purr while exhaling.

    28. Re:So... by EventHorizon_pc · · Score: 1

      The lion wouldn't know you. Perhaps if it did...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvCjyWp3rEk

      nuff said.

  9. Cats: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have no chance to survive make your time

  10. It's from cats, thus it's "evil design" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geez, haven't you ever seen this documentary?

  11. old news by loki_tiwaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i noticed years ago my cat used to put on this special voice that seemed to elicit some kind of unconscious reaction in me. second time around at cat owning the little wench has tried it once or twice but i'm immune to it, the first cat overdid it and it stopped working for him.

    when i first read this article i thought it was talking about the 'chirping' that cats do when they are extra happy purring, or maybe something a female cat a friend of mine has does a lot, these quiet, semi-pur semi-miao chirpy noises.

    cats are more intelligent than many of their owners, and the fact that the cats are able to manipulate their owners just proves it. my cat doesn't manipulate me though. i eventually see through her little ploys. except the one that makes me like having her around of course.

    1. Re:old news by loki_tiwaz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i thought i should clarify about the 'special voice' i refer to, it's not that brrraaao sound, although a neighbour's cat i noticed doing that, and it resembles the call female cats do when they are on heat, which can often closely resemble a baby crying, it's a sound that's more akin to the sound of a bell being struck, a very rich resonant sound. that's the only cat miao wanting attention that i've ever found compelling, the other kind of miao is just cute and doesn't seem demanding at all.

    2. Re:old news by Aladrin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My cat just has an annoying meow sound she makes when she wants attention. It's not cute or nice, it just grates on the nerves. She was very late in learning to meow when she wants things, so I think that has a lot to do with it. (I had another cat that took care of her and did all the asking, so she never had to. After he died, she had to learn to take care of herself and she was already like 5 years old.)

      There's no doubt she learns, though... But sometimes she 'learns' things that are wrong. For instance, for some reason she thinks that I'll fill up the water bowl more often if she drops food in it. She's wrong, but she's done it for years now. There's always exactly 1 piece, no matter how far from the food bowl it is.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:old news by loki_tiwaz · · Score: 1

      lol... yeah it's probably the exact same trick, it's not like scratching nails on a blackboard but it has a similar quality that affects your nerves.

      maybe your cat is asking for real food? like, chunks of meat she can tear at?

    4. Re:old news by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      It might be a bit presumptious to assume you know your cat's goals and motivations and is too silly to realise it doesn't work. It may be that she drops a piece of food into the water for other reasons. Maybe your former cat was a messy eater and it reminds her of him (wouldn't that be tragic?). Perhaps it simply makes the water taste better. Maybe it's fun to do, but only once. Why would it be fun, but only once? I don't know, I'm not a cat.

      Of course, you could be right. Years of empirical evidence clearly shows that a water bowl with a piece of food in it will eventually be refilled. Perhaps she only learned the first half of the scientific method.

      Another possibility is that she started doing it for a specific reason, and now continues doing it just because it's what she's always done. It's merely a comfortable habit.

    5. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe your cat just like Flavored Water :) ;)

    6. Re:old news by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      For instance, for some reason she thinks that I'll fill up the water bowl more often if she drops food in it. She's wrong, but she's done it for years now. There's always exactly 1 piece, no matter how far from the food bowl it is.

      Perhaps she likes the taste better if there is a piece of food in it?

    7. Re:old news by NocturnHimtatagon · · Score: 1

      Maybe she drops food in it because she has difficulties seeing the water?

    8. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat just has an annoying meow sound she makes when she wants attention. It's not cute or nice, it just grates on the nerves. She was very late in learning to meow when she wants things, so I think that has a lot to do with it. (I had another cat that took care of her and did all the asking, so she never had to. After he died, she had to learn to take care of herself and she was already like 5 years old.)

      There's no doubt she learns, though... But sometimes she 'learns' things that are wrong. For instance, for some reason she thinks that I'll fill up the water bowl more often if she drops food in it. She's wrong, but she's done it for years now. There's always exactly 1 piece, no matter how far from the food bowl it is.

      She is mimicking human behavior of putting an ice cube in the water. She just thinks Meow Mix is ice cubes, I guess.

    9. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your cat wants fresh water. Duh. Get with the program!

    10. Re:old news by pimp0r · · Score: 1

      Has it occured to you that your cat is trying to communicate with you?

      It's not like the cat can sit up and say "Listen, that water is too warm and disgusting and making me drink it is making me very unhappy."

      Instead of treating it as a fight for dominance between you and the cat, perhaps you should view it as an honest communication attempt and fix the water situation. It is obviously important enough to the cat to to have complained in the only way she can think of, non-stop, for years.

    11. Re:old news by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Cats will only drink non-stagnant or newly puddled water. Dropping one piece lets her know when the water gets changed. She's probably not drinking _until_ it gets changed, so she's not getting enough water. Cats should get a change of water once a day at least.

    12. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny

    13. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a shiney water bowl is it? I've noticed some cats have problems determining where the water surface is and how deep it is when the bowl is reflective. Your cat could be dropping that piece of food in there to give her depth perception something to fix on.

    14. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shouldn't leave stale water with food in it for obvious reasons. Would you drink that?

      It's probably a piece of dried food stuck to her chin that gets loosened and drops off in the water bowl - not an intentional action of the cat.

      Sounds like your cat deserves a more caring owner.

    15. Re:old news by anagama · · Score: 1

      Water preference is interesting. I have a pottery studio in the middle of a field out in the country. Several years ago, some cats moved in and I started feeding them. Since then, we became good friends.

      Inside my studio are buckets with clay scraps and water. The water that floats on top of the clay is the cats' absolute favorite drink. Certain kinds of bacteria grow in the clay giving it an earthy smell (and secreting compounds that make it more workable). The water that goes in these buckets is well water from a spigot.

      The cats' second favorite water is the rain water that I collect under the rain spout (sometimes the well runs dry or the power is out -- nice to have some water about). Leaves and bugs fall into this, and when the water has the color of light tea, it becomes quite desirable for the cats. If I dump out the water thinking "that can't be good" -- they avoid the bucket until it has had enough time to get a sufficient amount of leaves in it to make tea -- this can take weeks and none of the cats will bother with the water.

      A close second to the rain water tea, is commercial bottled water in a teacup on a table, but for only one particular cat. The others aren't that interested, but this guy clearly lived with someone before he found his way to my studio.

      After this, puddles in the garden from either well water from watering the garden, or rain, seem to be acceptable drinking sources for all the cats, but definitely not like clay water. The cats drink the clay water often and for long periods -- like they are drinking for pleasure, not thirst.

      As for plain water in a bowl on a floor (either well or bottled), nobody every drinks that. Cat food does find its way into the bowl, but it is always completely full of water. The only time it gets used is if the clay water, leaf tea, teacup water, or puddle water are completely absent.

      Anyway, it seems completely reasonable that a cat might have a favored drink. To the GP poster, instead of tormenting your cat, why don't you spend sometime finding out what your cat likes and making that available.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    16. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe for flavouring as oppossed to actually getting you to refill the water? Mine used to do that as well (i don't have cats at the moment).

    17. Re:old news by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      It is actually a glass bowl, and -I- have trouble with the water level, so that could be it.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    18. Re:old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For instance, for some reason she thinks that I'll fill up the water bowl more often if she drops food in it. She's wrong, but she's done it for years now. There's always exactly 1 piece, no matter how far from the food bowl it is.

      Seems your cat got religion...

  12. hidden effect by dwarfenhoschi · · Score: 2, Informative

    You know i think its more a subtle effect...not some mind controlling thing ^^ I mean, pretty much everyone thinks that cats are cute...right ?

    1. Re:hidden effect by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Cute? Maybe. Delicious? I hope to find out some day.

  13. Difficult to ignore? by Fotograf · · Score: 0, Troll

    Me actually it would make more angry. No food kitty...

    --
    God's gift to chicks
  14. !hardware and !power, I'd say :)) (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t ^)

  15. More likely micro-evolution by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cats that make the most attractive noise get fed most. Have the most offspring. Eventually dominate. Given what we've done to dogs by selective breeding in just a thousand years or so, this is a simple and believable scenario. Selecting cats for their purr is no more extraordinary than, say, the difference we've created between a spaniel and a Mexican Hairless.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:More likely micro-evolution by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Erh... the flaw in your theory is that the cats that are closest to human (i.e. cats living in apartments), thus also the best fed ones, are also the ones that are most likely not able to produce any offspring...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:More likely micro-evolution by rvw · · Score: 1

      Erh... the flaw in your theory is that the cats that are closest to human (i.e. cats living in apartments), thus also the best fed ones, are also the ones that are most likely not able to produce any offspring...

      I don't know in what world you live, but those cats create offspring like rabbits! Where I live there are so many cats going outside each day and night, enough opportunity to do whatever needs to be done.

    3. Re:More likely micro-evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Erh... the flaw in your theory is that the cats that are closest to human (i.e. cats living in apartments), thus also the best fed ones, are also the ones that are most likely not able to produce any offspring...

      The trend of spay/neutering your cat is a relatively recent trend. Now, you may have a good point that this evolutionary tactic may very well start to reverse, since the cats that now use the tactic are not reproducing while cats in the wild that find no need for this tactic begin to lose it.

    4. Re:More likely micro-evolution by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dunno where you live, but where I do people routinely have their toms' cores removed, so to speak. With them they tend to be a wee bit hard on the olfactory senses.

      And female cats in heat can be quite a bit of a handful too, so this is 'taken care of' as well...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:More likely micro-evolution by Antidamage · · Score: 3, Funny

      The other thing to keep in mind is that dogs endear themselves with pack behaviour, something cats don't quite take to.

      Dogs are extremely engaging, attentive and loyal and that's pretty much all they had to do to ensure their survival alongside humanity.

      Cats, lacking this instinct, had to evolve to be cute as well or face getting eaten. Therefore the most personable, adorable and lovely cats had a much better chance of survival.

      I guess that goes quite a way to explaining why cats are much elegant appearing and nicer to touch than dogs. Imagine an animal that looked like a dog and behaved like a cat. We'd eat that fucker to extinction as a service to the world.

    6. Re:More likely micro-evolution by smchris · · Score: 1

      The really syrupy meow is distinctive. My cat usually uses it to beg to go out, but then she'd rather go out in the morning first, eat later.

      Cats have many distinctive behaviors. How long until scientists realize cats smile?

    7. Re:More likely micro-evolution by quadrox · · Score: 1

      Funny thing that cats are still around and new ones keep getting born - what with each and every cat being neutered, right?

      Or maybe you're just plain wrong with your assumption.

    8. Re:More likely micro-evolution by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Yes but we're talking about the evolutionary effect over thousands of years, for most of which presumably cats weren't getting neutered.

    9. Re:More likely micro-evolution by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you're just plain wrong with your assumption.

      Or maybe the cats that reproduce are most often ones owned by breeders, while most cats owned by "normal people" are neutered.

    10. Re:More likely micro-evolution by wfstanle · · Score: 1

      Absolutely they "smile". When brushed, my cat has a look of absolute bliss on his face. They just have different facial expressions than humans do.

    11. Re:More likely micro-evolution by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Head into a cat adoption center in the springtime and tell me most domesticated cats are neutered. There are alarming amounts of "homeless" cats and kittens.

    12. Re:More likely micro-evolution by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Or maybe the cats that reproduce are most often ones owned by breeders, while most cats owned by "normal people" are neutered.

      No cat owner is 'normal' by any sense of the word.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    13. Re:More likely micro-evolution by obeythefist · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine an animal that looked like a dog and behaved like a cat. We'd eat that fucker to extinction as a service to the world.

      Those are called foxes. I presume considering there is no Kentucky Fried Fox restaurant near me that they are not yummy.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  16. Huh? by Haiyadragon · · Score: 1

    What, in the name of Zeus's butt-hole, does this have to do with hardware?

    science, artificialselection, hardware, power, story
    hardly, no, no, no, a bad one

    1. Re:Huh? by Turiko · · Score: 1

      i know, i said the same in my first post up high in this list. The one who tagged this is either stupid or took drugs.

    2. Re:Huh? by chub_mackerel · · Score: 0

      Y hrdware?

      Cuz humenz iz hrdware, not software.

      Kitteh jus purrz an humanz go getz cheezburger.

    3. Re:Huh? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Trolling has moved to story tags apparently...

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  17. I for one welcome ... by Phantasmagoria · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I for one welcome our new cat overlords!

    --
    Loban Amaan Rahman ==> Anagram of ==> Aha! An Abnormal Man!
    1. Re:I for one welcome ... by Calydor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      New?

      The cats were worshiped as gods in ancient Egypt. They never STOPPED being our overlords.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    2. Re:I for one welcome ... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      At least they're cute and fluffy, compared to the average politician I'd call that a step in the right direction.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:I for one welcome ... by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      The cats were worshiped as gods in ancient Egypt. They never STOPPED being our overlords.

      Dogs have masters, Cats have servants.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re:I for one welcome ... by Phantasmagoria · · Score: 1

      You're right! But now that we know how they do it, a revolution is around the corner! :-P

      --
      Loban Amaan Rahman ==> Anagram of ==> Aha! An Abnormal Man!
  18. This explains by Norsefire · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:This explains by DarrylM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hehe... that's good. I like this as well:

      Felis catus, is your taxonomic nomenclature,
      An endothermic quadruped, carnivorous by nature;
      Your visual, olfactory, and auditory senses
      Contribute to your hunting skills and natural defenses.

      I find myself intrigued by your subvocal oscillations,
      A singular development of cat communications
      That obviates your basic hedonistic predilection
      For a rhythmic stroking of your fur to demonstrate affection.

      A tail is quite essential for your acrobatic talents;
      You would not be so agile if you lacked its counterbalance.
      And when not being utilized to aid in locomotion,
      It often serves to illustrate the state of your emotion.

      O Spot, the complex levels of behavior you display
      Connote a fairly well-developed cognitive array.
      And though you are not sentient, Spot, and do not comprehend,
      I nonetheless consider you a true and valued friend.

  19. I think I've seen a video of this research... by lavaboy · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Steve -- If you have to call it a system, you don't know what it is.
  20. Cats are evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When a dog looks at you it thinks "What can I do for you master"
    When a cat looks at you it thinks "If I had hands I could open my own cans, and you'd be dead"

  21. Hard to ignore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not really hard to ignore. It's just that when they purr they know and you know that you'll feel like a jerk if you don't pet them/feed them/whatever. So you choose to do what they want every time.

    Which... doesn't sound all that different from being hard to ignore in text. My point is, it's more us playing into their hands than them exploiting us. We choose to submit to their will, cause, well... kitty. If you don't do what they want you feel bad and they keep on purring to annoy and remind you that you feel bad and should feel bad. If you placate them, they shut up, you feel good, and you get to pet a kitteh. That way, everyone's happy. ...maybe they do exploit us.

  22. Definitely not evolution - adaptation, maybe by petes_PoV · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just like some birds have learned to mimic the ring tones of mobile phones (and normal phones, too). There's no evolutionary pressure here, it's just that cats do have some (small - very small) glimmer of intelligence and learn that making certain noises will get them what they want. Babies also do this, so we're not talking about anything that's particularly difficult. Dogs are also known to respond to their names - though to to all the other chatter that their owners seem to think they'll understand.

    In fact, pretty much any animal - even my goldfish, can be conditioned to respond to a food stimulus - they know what precedes them being fed and act accordingly.

    The only surprising thing about this is that the cats haven't got their owners better trained in all this time.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:Definitely not evolution - adaptation, maybe by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      There's no evolutionary pressure here

      No one said it was. Neither the article nor the summary mention evolution at all.

    2. Re:Definitely not evolution - adaptation, maybe by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Cats are very unusual in evolutionary terms. For solitary animals, they have remarkably well developed social skills. The ability to make a wide variety of vocal sounds is usually associated with social development and mating habits too.

      Clearly humans have not been a major factor in their evolution - we have not been domesticating them for nearly long enough. By chance they developed into cute, furry and agreeable little things that human beings enjoy having around. They are intelligent enough to manipulate us quite successfully and yet, despite being fully aware of what is happening we accept and even enjoy it. Being highly independent they have their own little lives which fascinate us.

      Maybe it's just anthropomorphism, but it's certainly highly fortunate from the cat's point of view. Average life expectancy in the wild is a few years, domesticated it's 10+.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Definitely not evolution - adaptation, maybe by holmstar · · Score: 1

      In fact, pretty much any animal - even my goldfish, can be conditioned to respond to a food stimulus - they know what precedes them being fed and act accordingly.

      Agreed.

      I have a reef aquarium. One of its inhabitants is a cleaner shrimp who has learned that when i open the cover of the aquarium, its dinner time. Normally it hangs out on the underside of one of the rocks, but as soon as I open the cover he/she (not sure) is straight out in front waiting for tasty morsels.

      Cleaner shrimp have a brain about the size of a grain of sand. If they can develop a response to "food stimulus" anything can.

    4. Re:Definitely not evolution - adaptation, maybe by Whorhay · · Score: 0, Troll

      True for overly broad definitions of "we" and "us" I'd much rather BBQ the furballs in my house than let them freeload.

    5. Re:Definitely not evolution - adaptation, maybe by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Clearly humans have not been a major factor in their evolution - we have not been domesticating them for nearly long enough.

      "Clearly"? Hell no. Cats have been domesticated for thousands of years, plenty of time for humans to have a substantial evolutionary pressure on them. The idea that "by chance" they developed into the modern domesticated cat is ludicrous. The minute humans started feeding specific cats because they were cuter or more social, we applied an evolutionary pressure that selected for those traits.

    6. Re:Definitely not evolution - adaptation, maybe by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Cats are very unusual in evolutionary terms. For solitary animals, they have remarkably well developed social skills

      Lions.

      They are intelligent enough to manipulate us quite successfully and yet, despite being fully aware of what is happening we accept and even enjoy it.

      That's a stretch. Dogs manipulate humans in exactly the same way. Cats are simply more independent, and less pack-oriented, so their priority is getting what they want, and angering their owner is a rather low priority.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  23. In other news... by BigMeanBear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stuff with brains can learn.

    --
    += E
  24. My faith in /. is restored by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Over 50 replies and nobody resorted to LOLcats and the associated mangling of the English language.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:My faith in /. is restored by gaderael · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry to ruin it for you.

      --
      Anyone got a light for my sig?
    2. Re:My faith in /. is restored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please....

      http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_QeQbDplhneo/R43KGV4N40I/AAAAAAAAATE/SIuqvbqOJJ0/s400/lolcatgrammar.JPG

  25. Re:This explains everything by ozbird · · Score: 3, Funny
  26. Cat purrrs that sound like babies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I visit a area of Korea about 3-4 times a month that has a very high feral cat population. These cats here make almost a perfect immiation of a baby's cry. I don't mean it's on the same frequency or anything, but it actually sounds like it. More than once I was fooled into thinking it was an actual baby.

    I asked a few of the older locals and they told me they always sounded like it, while the newer locals tell me they still get suprised at night (they sometimes lurk the apartments).

    1. Re:Cat purrrs that sound like babies by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
      Baby goats sound the same.

      Yet we don't think of them as cute and cuddly. What I think we have with cats is just a case of parallel development - it may be that all animals (incl. human ones) who have the same basic vocal chords and hearing range, will make the same sort of sounds. That cat owners anthropomorphise (sp?) this might tell you about some inner needs they have, or something about their personalities - though quite what that would be, I haven't a clue.

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    2. Re:Cat purrrs that sound like babies by Sulphur · · Score: 4, Funny

      One goat fart, and its an outdoor goat.

  27. anyway, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's still better than "cats exploit humans by taking their credit card and buying cat food online".

    1. Re:anyway, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which, by the way, would make for a more appropriate post to slashdot.

  28. Doesn't suprise me. by unforkable · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't suprise me. I had a cat that had recognizable sounds when being with his kitten or when asking us for food. You can even swear it tries to spell my name. I'm pretty sure they will dominate the world one day.

  29. What is the intercourse sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    What, you don't pork your cats?

  30. And If Humans Were Only Six Inches Tall by aquatone282 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... cats wouldn't be purring at all.

    --
    What?
  31. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It's not brushing you up for food, it's wiping it's arse. Now who's the sheep?

  32. Self domesticated aka evolution by siloko · · Score: 1

    Self domesticated!? Surely by definition domestication is an externally enforced process, one in which the powerful enforces/trains a useful/preferable mode of behavior over the weak. To Self-domesticate would simply mean to evolve, to have certain traits preserved due to their being conducive to cohabitation with humans.

    1. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by wjousts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must of never owned a cat.

    2. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by holmstar · · Score: 1

      To Self-domesticate would simply mean to evolve, to have certain traits preserved due to their being conducive to cohabitation with humans.

      Exactly, but isn't it easier just to say self-domesticate? Clearly you understood the meaning.

    3. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1, Insightful

      To a dog, the human owner is the pack leader, who should always be followed and obeyed. To a cat, the human owner is just a convenient source of food.

    4. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      >You must of never owned a cat.

      You must have failed English.

    5. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by ammorais · · Score: 0

      To a dog, the human owner is the pack leader, who should always be followed and obeyed. To a cat, the human owner is just a convenient source of food.

      Not exactly. As an owner of 4 cats, I find that very hard to believe. At the moment that I'm writing this I have a cat struggling to come to my lap, and it isn't for food. It's very interesting to see all kinds of notable "scientific" theories about cats. I found many of them at least reductive of the real cat behavior.

    6. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by fracai · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That's unpossible.

      --
      -- i am jack's amusing sig file
    7. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by LabRat007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To a dog, the human owner is the pack leader, who should always be followed and obeyed. To a cat, the human owner is just a convenient source of food.

      I used to agree with that statement, but not anymore. We have two cats in our home. One of the two plays fetch AGGRESSIVELY. While I'm at my computer she brings me toys to throw all night. Its an interaction I didn't think possible in cats. But its not a creepy as the pack activity.

      The cats follow me around from room to room while I'm home. On the few times I've argued with people in my home they either flank or circle behind the person I'm arguing with, growling and hissing the entire time. One one occasion they actually attacked someone they like because I was yelling at them.

      They also seem to understand that my children are my children. They tolerate abuse from them that they wouldn't take from me or anyone else and NEVER give them any grief. They actually hang out with my 1 year old (if I'm in the room) and let her roll/drool all over them without complaint. They even go so far as to wake my wife and I up when the kids are restless at night. Its not behavior I would have ever expected from cats.

      --
      "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
    8. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To a dog, the human owner is the pack leader, who should always be followed and obeyed. To a cat, the human owner is just a convenient source of food.

      I used to agree with that statement, but not anymore. We have two cats in our home. One of the two plays fetch AGGRESSIVELY. While I'm at my computer she brings me toys to throw all night. Its an interaction I didn't think possible in cats. But its not a creepy as the pack activity.

      Almost every cat I've owned over the years has done the fetch thing to one degree or another. They all fixate on different toys/objects. I had one who loved fetching pipecleaners of all things. You could fake him out and throw it another direction and he would NOT STOP LOOKING FOR IT until he eventually found it. Hours later he would deposit it at my feet and smack me in the leg.

      The cats follow me around from room to room while I'm home. On the few times I've argued with people in my home they either flank or circle behind the person I'm arguing with, growling and hissing the entire time. One one occasion they actually attacked someone they like because I was yelling at them.

      I've seen this happen too. The pipecleaner-obsessed cat was a 19 LB neutered male (black). People did not like to argue with me when he was around. When I was a kid, the family cat went after my sister when we got in a screaming match.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    9. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess most of those dog owners I see when I walk my dog, with their dogs way in front of them barking wildly at me have it backwards then :-D

    10. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by tixxit · · Score: 1

      Almost every cat I've owned over the years has done the fetch thing to one degree or another. They all fixate on different toys/objects. I had one who loved fetching pipecleaners of all things. You could fake him out and throw it another direction and he would NOT STOP LOOKING FOR IT until he eventually found it. Hours later he would deposit it at my feet and smack me in the leg.

      My cat always loses his favourite "toy" (a flat plastic handle) under the closet door. He will wait until I get home, then get me to follow him to the closet and meow until I get the toy out for him. At which point, he'll promptly fling it back under the door.

    11. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      Cats believe they are human and wonder why the heck we don't all eat at the same table. In fact, they even bring in food (freshly killed birds, mice and other critters). However, my wife freaks out when they do, so they now stopped. Devolution if you ask me.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    12. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got it backwards, those are dogs.

    13. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by piojo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, posting to undo my accidental modding of you down.

      For what it's worth, I agree. Many cats are too affectionate to just think of humans as a food source. I also think they put up with a lot of shit--ever hug your cats? The human is the alpha cat in the house (if the cat is fixed, anyway).

      --
      A cat can't teach a dog to bark.
    14. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by Paranatural · · Score: 1

      I've seen this happen too. The pipecleaner-obsessed cat was a 19 LB neutered male (black). People did not like to argue with me when he was around. When I was a kid, the family cat went after my sister when we got in a screaming match.

      Similar things have happened with me. When I was a kid I had a big Siamese (Neutered). One time my grandmother was dragging me out back to get a willow branch to spank me because me and my sister had been fighting. I was resisting her and crying and whatnot, and my cat jumped on her back, bit and clawed her up pretty bad actually, and I ran off to my room. By time I opened the window he was there waiting to be let in.

    15. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      The cats follow me around from room to room while I'm home.

      I have two cats who do this with my daughter. They are absolutely fixated on her (she's 19 now, but we've had these cats since she was young). They spend most of their time in her room. When my daughter comes into another room—say my office/study—it's as though an unruly mob has entered. The cats will start jumping up on my desk, mess with my stuff, and generally drive me crazy; I think they do this to make her go back to her room so they will have her to themselves. One of the cats is semi-social, and will allow other people to pet her, but the other is completely a one-person cat. Occasionall, daughter leaves for a vacation. When this happens, the one-person cat freaks. First, I won't see her for a week—she hides somewhere, and doesn't come out. Then after a week, she will occasionally come into the same room with me and meow plaintively. By the third week, the cat will start to approach me, complaining bitterly, but evading any attempt at contact. Finally, she overcomes her revulsion and jumps into my lap.

      I guess being second choice is better than last...the cat never goes near my wife, no matter how desperate she is.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    16. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by xmvince · · Score: 1

      Depends on the bonding you have done with your cat. I have 2 stupid cats that we adopted from a dead relative. They just wander around looking for scraps of food all day and begging. My cat which I raised from a kitten on the other hand enjoys playing and shows interest in things that I do and sometimes likes to watch my mouse on the computer screen and such. It just depends on the relationship/trust/bond you have with the cat. If the thing thinks you don't really care for it, it's not gonna show any emotion back to you except for "im hungry!"

    17. Re:Self domesticated aka evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My cat responds to his name and will come when called. That's something I never expected from cats either. He'll also "lay down" on command. The one thing I can't get him to do is stay. He follows me around constantly.

  33. "murr murr" by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this is related to an odd cat vocalization I've seen. At least three (non-overlapping) cats I've had over the years, make a vocalization (kind of a murrmurrmurr half-meow with their mouths closed) when they're in a happy or friendly mood.

    I've never heard other cats make this sound, so I was wondering if there was something I was doing in their upbringing to bring it out (some sound I was making they were trying to imitate, or picking up on the fact that the sound gets them attention?

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:"murr murr" by icebrain · · Score: 1

      We adopted a stray kitten (now 1+ years old) that makes the same noise, albeit not for quite the same reasons. He'll make it a lot when he's chasing or playing with something, or when he first takes off for a game of "chase the little cat around the house". He also makes a "squeaky" noise and a really pathetic keening when he wants something (usually your food). No normal meow from this one.

      Our other cat (a big fat siamese) has a low, gruff "pay attention to me" meow she makes when she wants to be petted (usually accompanied by headbutting your hand) and a plaintative "pleeeeeease" one, like if she wants to go out on the porch.

      Both of them have a very loud, annoying cry if they're out on the porch and want in, or if they're in their carriers in the car.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
  34. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    A sheep does not climb the bed backboard so it can jump on you when the alarm goes off. Sheep brains lack a convoluted surface; cats do not. -- When Czars are outlawed, only outlaws will have Czars.

  35. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I despise cats, I can't imagine why you cannot buy Cat Poison in the Hardware right next to Rat Poison.
    Yet my mother in laws cat still tries to brush up to me for food. I have never fed it, I simply push it away (Gently, my mother in law seems to be fond of it) but after many years of being pushed away it still tries.
    It has the learning power of a sheep.

    It fell for "Hope and Change" hook-line-and-sinker, too, and voted for Obama?

  36. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has the learning power of a sheep.

    Don't insult sheep! At least they don't kill other animals for fun and entertainment.

  37. Women do it too! by wmac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Women do the exploit very much better. Why not cats?

  38. cats also provide more by stimpleton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My mothers cat was a companion to her beyond something on 4 legs that just wanted food.

    Highlighted by the animal's actions previous to my mother suddenly passing away. For several weeks the cat would never leave her side, as she became ill. Then mom passed away suddenly in her sleep. The autopsy revealed a ruptured cyst around a cancerous growth on the large intestine. For a couple weeks previous to her death, she had complained the cat was licking the area just under her ribcage. The doctors were confused as to the raw area of skin on her belly area. The cat knew, and I believe was an effort to heal my mother the only way a cat knows how.

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    1. Re:cats also provide more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should watch House.
      Most likely, the area was warmer and possibly somewhat saltier than the rest of the body.

      Death kitties are a myth, not reality.

      Sorry to inform you of the reality.

    2. Re:cats also provide more by McCat · · Score: 1

      I do watch House. I think it's rather interesting that you're using a TV show (which is, by it's very nature, not necessarily indicative of reality) to make judgments about reality.

      Furthermore, the cat in House did not lick specific areas of dying patients' bodies. It sat on/next them, and only because of the heated blanket. Whether the licking was because the area was saltier or because the cat knew, I don't know. But if you're going to crush someone's romantic ideals in a manner similar to the way House would, at least back it up with proof and an explanation like he does.

    3. Re:cats also provide more by Anspen · · Score: 1

      It's been shown that dogs can smell some forms of cancer and diabetes.

    4. Re:cats also provide more by jenn_13 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if cats really do know stuff like that. It could be that they have a more sensitive sense of smell. One of my cats always follows me to the bathroom first thing in the morning, and he only started doing it a few days before I found out I was pregnant. Maybe the change in hormones or something. I'm curious to see if he keeps doing it after my son is born, and to see how the kitties react the first time they feel kicks while sitting on my lap.

    5. Re:cats also provide more by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Funny

      First off, I'm sorry.

      But ... the cat wasn't trying to heal her, it was preparing to eat her.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:cats also provide more by juancnuno · · Score: 1
    7. Re:cats also provide more by techess · · Score: 1

      The House episode was probably based on this kitty:

      http://www.usatoday.com/news/offbeat/2007-07-26-foreboding-feline_N.htm

      The Dr. quoted thinks that it may be due to the smell of the person or the behavior of the nurses towards the patients. The ability to smell disease is important when looking for a healthy mate so I lean towards smell.

      --
      Don't anthropomorphize computers. They *hate* that.
    8. Re:cats also provide more by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Pets don't have any kind of mystical powers when it comes to detecting disease, it all comes from the powers of observation.

      She knew that your mother was sick, and she wanted to take care of her. She probably knew that your mother was hurting in that area, because maybe your mother was holding that area or guarding it, much like how cats will guard cuts/sores/etc on their body when they get hurt. She had probably watched her for a while through the whole ordeal, so she thought, maybe there was a sore place there and she wanted your mother to get better.

      They say that dogs can sometimes detect lung cancer, and this is true, because lung cancer can alter the makeup of your exhalations, cause sounds in your breathing that weren't there before, make you tired, sick, etc. They pick up on this. Also, dogs and cats are great at noticing skin cancer. If you ever have a pet that sniffs at a mole continuously or licks at it or whatever, get it checked out, because something has changed to where the mundane mole is now attracting the attention of your pet.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    9. Re:cats also provide more by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "I'm curious to see if he keeps doing it after my son is born, and to see how the kitties react the first time they feel kicks while sitting on my lap."

      If they react like my wife's cats do to a twitching foot under a blanket, stock up on Bactine.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    10. Re:cats also provide more by FindItByMe · · Score: 1

      What you think cats are is not what you think cats are: 1. My soon-to-be-ex arrived one day to remove everything of value from the house. She confidently placed an expensive tea set we had both enjoyed on a table with many other items of equal fragility. I remarked that it was sad to see the tea set go since we had both enjoyed it so much. As I followed her to another room to witness further withdrawals, we both heard something break. Running back to the living room revealed the tea set alone broken on the floor, but nothing else from the table disturbed. After she left, I made sure the cat received a LOT of positive feedback. 2. I recently ate something which caused me great intestinal pain. My two year old male cat came to my side and sat at attention until my pain subsided. He has done this every time I've been in pain. 3. One of my employees came over to drop off some supplies. Her car was leaking oil. The cat sat at the garage door looking at the car through the screen and meowed incessantly. He has never done that before. I had to close the door to stop him from looking at the car and making noise. Four days later the head gasket blew and the engine ruined. 4. Where I live it is common to see scorpions. They easily enter my house, as I have found them under clothes on the floor. After getting the cat, he has found every single scorpion to enter and spends hours playing with them before impaling them. Last night he found a baby scorpion, no bigger than a spider. He finds them in pitch darkness; how I have no idea. 5. Cats are fast. In the time it took me to blink my eyes, he covered six feet and touched my face with his paw before my eyelid closed. Imagine if he weighed as much as a dog. 6. He understands when we play that "No claws!" means he does not use his claws when we wrestle. When I don't say that, I go through more bandages than usual. Conclusion: we don't have to wait for the flying saucers, the aliens are already here and have already taken over. We are their slaves. Why would the Egyptians build something as big as the Sphinx? Has anyone ever made a sculpture of a dog that size? They knew where they stood and left the statue as a warning to humanity.

  39. slashdot meme by cephus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Let's see ... what's the slashdot meme for situations like this ...

    In Soviet Russia, cats ... no

    I for one welcome our new cat ... no

    4) Profit ... no

    Oh, I remember now ... Water is wet, film at 11.

  40. so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cats would *bark* if we only feeded them when they barked?

  41. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm,

    Since when is a cats arse on its neck ?

  42. Cats - Dogs and rabbits too by Apoorv+Khatreja · · Score: 1

    I always suspected that they did. In fact, even rabbits and dogs do that kinda stuff. Not exactly voice modulation, but, you know, making that cute round face, running up to you and licking your legs whenever you grab something to eat from the kitchen. I seriously doubt the fact, however, that cats specifically found out what frequency our babies cry at, and then copied/used that frequency in their cries for food. It could be a coincidence.

    --
    RutSum.com
  43. Oh dear, not another exploit. by bmecoli · · Score: 0

    Man, I really do hope they release a patch for this soon.

  44. All cats are feral by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    Cats are the only "domesticated" animal that can go from domesticated to feral and back at will.

    You can release your house cat into the wild and (assuming they do not get eaten by a predator) they will survive just fine. You can also take a feral cat and domesticate it in very short order.

    1. Re:All cats are feral by Evildonald · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As someone who frequently rescues dumped, starving house cats on my farm, they do not "survive just fine". It is an tolerably cruel notion to domesticate an animal and "release it into the wild" to fend for itself.

  45. Thorndike, Skinner, other Psychologists disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    E.L. Thorndike's experiments investigating learning were conducted using cats and while B.F. Skinner may have used rats more than cats, he too used cats in his studies of learning.

    If you want to study an animal's intelligence / learning capabilities / reasoning capabilities you just have to be smart enough to construct the experiment properly.

    If you're not familiar with those experiments (and your post suggests you are not), E.L. Thorndike studied cats learning to escape from boxes to get food. Pretty good motivators for cats (unless it's in need of "boxhab").

    Not too dissimilar from arguments over whether men or women are smarter -- it is key to control for equally-valued motivators when assessing that :-)

  46. ever been around a feral cat or dog? by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you want to see what domesticated looks like, look at dogs, or horses. Domesticated dogs and horses take their instructions from human masters. Cats, as a rule, don't.

    If you want to see what non-domesticated looks like, have a feral cat in your house for an hour or two. Or a feral dog.

    If you and your house survive, congratulations. Cats ARE, in fact, domesticated animals, as are dogs- because they have early and often human contact. If kittens (or puppies) are not handled frequently once they get beyond a certain stage, they won't recognize or trust humans.

    1. Re:ever been around a feral cat or dog? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      If you want to see what non-domesticated looks like, have a feral cat in your house for an hour or two. Or a feral dog.

      Indeed. In Australia I have met some feral animals, like cats, on hunting trips and they are scary animals. Fortunately I was armed and under instructions from the owner of the property to destroy these animals when ever I had the opportunity as they attack the farmers livestock.

      They also decimate native species in Australia as many animals, especially cats, are dumped by people who no longer want the animals - an especially selfish act. Well over 500,000 species of animals are now extinct in Australia because of, mainly, feral cats who become very effective hunter when left to their own devices.

      People who want to own cats should have outdoor enclosures, which are available commercially, as even domesticated cats are very effective at killing wildlife.

      Still, the worst feral animal I've met is a feral human. They seem to be impossible to domesticate and are extremely dangerous.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re:ever been around a feral cat or dog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The species that are extinct in Australia are because of humans. Cats are just scapegoats. Humans build house, put asphalt everywhere, divide the habitats with roads, builds cities spanning the entire habitats of species and cats are the one responsible for the extinction ?

        While cats can damage local wildlife they cannot drive a species into extinction because they are opportunistic generalist predators. Well they can in small islands but on a continent like Australia only specialist predators that prey onto only one other species can drive it into extinction. If cats could extinguish a species, there would be no rats and no mice left in the world. Cats are just not efficient enough to drive a specie into extinction.

    3. Re:ever been around a feral cat or dog? by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Cats are just not efficient enough to drive a specie into extinction.

      They don't need to be, many species already have enough pressure put on them already by human activity. So, in a sense I suppose you are right as irresponsible cat ownership is a human activity.

      However wikipedia outlines the science in which a Heirisson Prong study found that cats *are* indeed the cause of the species decline of native mammals.

      I have seen large feral cats. By large I mean a ball of muscle over 20kgs, it's hard to believe that they would have any difficulty eating anything they want to. Especially in Australia where cats are an introduced species and the native animals do not have a predator response to them as they would to a Dingo (Australian native dog), fox or feral dog. Dog species are the only thing vaguely close to being a predator for a feral cat.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    4. Re:ever been around a feral cat or dog? by gsmraxe · · Score: 1

      Ah, I live with 2 ex-feral cats. They make wonderful pets. one is 12 now the other almost 10. The older one I brought home at age 1 and the other at age 3 months.

      After all of these years of living with them, I still have a house.

      Oh yeah, and I also captured two ferals from a colony I used to feed, to take them to FOCUS and get them spayed/neutered. The male, well he was wild, the female was not so much. I kept them overnight and my boss picked them up and kept them at her house overnight the next day after surgery. When we let them go, the female hung out in the office until the place closed down, but the male was so pissed, he disappeared and we never saw him again. Ever try to trap a feral cat? They know how to thwart those capture cages, I watched one step over the part of the cage that would trigger the door so she could eat the fish. She carefully backed out when she was done. She had never seen a trap before either. This is why I only managed to get two of them.

  47. "have tapped" "exploiting" what bullshit by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    cats have not tapped into anything at any time. it was already their normal attitude. cats psychologically see humans as their mothers. both men, and women alike. it doesnt matter. therefore they do all stuff they do to their mothers, to their human companions. no surprise they also make that sound.

    to 'tap' into such a thing would require a cat to observe a baby, then imitate him/her. yet, how many cats that were in the research have observed a baby crying ? how many cats were raised with a baby ?

    this thing has to be just another instinctive behaviour cats do to their mothers at early age. i wonder why this schmuck didnt research whether baby cats also do that to mother cats.

    1. Re:"have tapped" "exploiting" what bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched the video, Pepo was making the "I'm Hungry" purr. I am vary familar with the "I'm hungry purr", My current Cat use and my parents cat make that sound when it is breakfast and dinner time. My parent's Cat put the "I'm Hungry" purr to good use, tricked us into 3-4 breakfast and Dinner feeding a day, until we released we all where giving the cat food!!! House cat have use People well trained.

    2. Re:"have tapped" "exploiting" what bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually the other way round.

      Cats have two modes of speech. One is the shorter, chirruping sounds and high short meows they use mostly with their young.

      The other is the louder yowling meows and growls they use to talk to other adult cats.

      With humans, they mostly use kitten talk. Perhaps they don't think we'd understand adult conversation.

    3. Re:"have tapped" "exploiting" what bullshit by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      No, cats see cat owners as ignorant pushovers and manipulate the shit out of them to do whatever they want.

      The cats are right, most cat owners ARE ignorant pushovers who let them do whatever they want because 'thats the way cats are'

      Cats are certainly exploiting their owners because their owners are unable to command respect from anything.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:"have tapped" "exploiting" what bullshit by evilviper · · Score: 1

      therefore they do all stuff they do to their mothers, to their human companions. no surprise they also make that sound.

      Non-domesticated adult cats don't make ANY vocalizations, whether their mothers are around, or not.

      to 'tap' into such a thing would require a cat to observe a baby, then imitate him/her.

      You don't have to observe someone else. You can work out on your own how to get a desired result through trial and error.

      Cats are tapping into humans' nature every time they vocalize (meow). That's purely a learned behavior, as this one may be.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:"have tapped" "exploiting" what bullshit by unity100 · · Score: 1

      Non-domesticated adult cats don't make ANY vocalizations, whether their mothers are around, or not.

      that's because after a certain age, their mothers push them away from themselves. with humans, that doesnt happen.

      and yes, you have to observe someone else to be able to discover some pattern you do NOT evolutionarily or instinctively ALREADY have. to discover that thing by 'trial and error', cat would try anything that is ALREADY built in him/her by evolution, and then find out which works.

      your post contains logic errors.

    6. Re:"have tapped" "exploiting" what bullshit by evilviper · · Score: 1

      that's because after a certain age, their mothers push them away from themselves. with humans, that doesnt happen.

      Making sweeping generalizations from the few things you think you know, about a subject of which you are extremely ignorant, is NOT logic... it's call stupidity.

      ie. Cavities are caused by not brushing your teeth. Therefore, brushing twice as much must make cavities go away. It's plain and simple logic... It's also factually incorrect, and moronic on the face of it.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  48. No. by unity100 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    to a cat, human owner is a mother. they exhibit all behavior they do to their mothers to their human owners.

    1. Re:No. by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      said by someone who never had^H^H^Hlived with a cat. *

      to grown up male cats, humans are a source of food and entertainment. maybe like a brother. to females, humans are more like ofsprings. that's why they bring in dead and half-dead animals home. they want you - the human - to use that carcass/weakened creature as play toys. this teaches usefull hunting and killing skills.

      * humans don't own cats. we live with them in the bast-case scenario. in the worst case, the CAT owns YOU! cue the "in soviet russia" jokes.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    2. Re:No. by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      I don't know, the "owner as mother" theory goes a lot farther towards explaining why both my cats always try to suckle at my armpit.

    3. Re:No. by Prune · · Score: 1

      I'd say a zoologist like Desmond Morris is a much more reliable reference on cats, and he is in agreement with the grandparent and disagreement with you.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    4. Re:No. by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      we live with them in the bast-case scenario

      Hey! An Egyptian mythology pun!

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    5. Re:No. by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      said by someone who never had^H^H^Hlived with a cat. * to grown up male cats, humans are a source of food and entertainment. maybe like a brother. to females, humans are more like ofsprings. that's why they bring in dead and half-dead animals home. they want you - the human - to use that carcass/weakened creature as play toys. this teaches usefull hunting and killing skills. * humans don't own cats. we live with them in the bast-case scenario. in the worst case, the CAT owns YOU! cue the "in soviet russia" jokes.

      This is an astute observation. I have two female cats and they will take turns grooming me much in the same way as they would a kitten. They are methodical and try to cover every inch. They will groom the hair on my arms and legs and occasionally use their teeth like combs as they would with kittens. I am bald so they don't bother with my head. They do, on occasion, bring home food or training objects and look at me as if I am retarded when I don't get down on all fours and start chasing or eating. And the cat really does own you.

    6. Re:No. by BitZtream · · Score: 4, Funny

      They bring dead/half-dead animals home to let you know that you're one step away from being dead if you piss them off, not to feed you or teach you.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    7. Re:No. by shadowbearer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Our male, 20 year old tomcat had the same behavior wrt bringing home "food" for us. Not so long ago he dragged home a large rabbit he'd killed, and deposited it in front of the cupboard in the kitchen where the cookware was housed. Then he sat by it and talked until we noticed.

        We figured that he wanted us to cook it up and eat it. ...

        We lost him a couple months ago. Our lives are bleak without him - he was more intelligent than most humans, and had a very low sense of humor - is humor a mark of intelligence? We miss him terribly.

        Cats are at least as intelligent as humans are. Possibly more so.

        Just because humans have developed technology and the ability to destroy ourselves does not make us more sapient than anything else.

        It's likely a mark against us that we can't recognize the other intelligent species on this planet we live with.

        But that's just my opinion. No, I am not a member of PETA, although I do think they make some good points, mostly wrt we can't consider ourselves civilized until we stop treating even the members of our own species as objects rather than as people.

        Of course it could be that I'm getting old and bitter and pissed off...

        SB

       

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    8. Re:No. by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

      It's more complicated than that...

      I lived with a black tom called Bastard. He was unneutered, friendly, and in other respects resembled the descriptions of Greebo in Terry Pratchett's novels. He used to sit in my lap, purr like a road drill, and knead my stomach and breasts with his paws, a behaviour known as 'milk gesturing' - ie, asking for milk. He'd also get turned on, possibly a reaction to my scent. So, it's possible that he saw me as a mother, a sex object, a child, and a non-feline *thing* (based on descriptions of the slightly confused body language that cats using when interacting with humans). This *is* speculation.

    9. Re:No. by Dr.Altaica · · Score: 1

      in soviet russia you own the cat.

    10. Re:No. by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      to grown up male cats, humans are a source of food and entertainment. maybe like a brother. to females, humans are more like ofsprings. that's why they bring in dead and half-dead animals home. they want you - the human - to use that carcass/weakened creature as play toys. this teaches usefull hunting and killing skills.

      It's fun to guess why cats do stuff, but in the end, only the cat knows. I once had a friend who left her cat for a few weeks. I was in charge of filling up the kibble container and the water dish. She left one of the windows open a crack so the cat could come and go as he pleased. When she returned, she found a "present" nicely centered on the pillow of her bed. It was a long-dead bird, crawling with maggots. Now, was this in fact a present for my friend, or was it revenge for being gone? That was the truly sinister aspect of it, as far as I was concerned—revenge is at its most cruel when it keeps you guessing.

      Nope, the only thing about cats you can be sure of is that they really, really hate doors.

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
    11. Re:No. by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      The mouse body missing the head is not a "present", it's a warning....

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    12. Re:No. by Khyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've owned dozens of cats. All the males and all the females come by, flop near me, groom me, knead at my clothing, purr happily and relax. Sometimes if I try to leave, one of my female kitties will reach up, grab me (with claws,) and pull me back to continue grooming/kneading me. Maybe your cat was mistreated, none of mine were and they exhibited all the behaviors their mothers performed around them.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    13. Re:No. by hardwarefreak · · Score: 1

      to a cat, human owner is a mother. they exhibit all behavior they do to their mothers to their human owners.

      My cat has never latched onto my nipple to nurse (thank God), so I'd say your argument needs a little refinement.

    14. Re:No. by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      in soviet russia you own the cat.

      No. No you don't.
       
       

      Roses are red,

      Violets are blue,

      Even in Soviet Russia,

      Cat owns you!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    15. Re:No. by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Quite possibly the most devastating thing in the world would be a predator as cunning as a cat with opposable thumbs.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    16. Re:No. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      said by someone who never had^H^H^Hlived with a cat. *

      making assumptions out of one's ass makes expressing opinions easy. here, let me try one :

      'said by someone who never pooped from his ass'.

      see ? now i can append any opinion related to mouths, asses and poops after that.

    17. Re:No. by CurtMonash · · Score: 1

      It's not an either/or. Cats behave towards us in some ways like they do toward their mothers, in other ways otherwise.

      My cat treats me largely as his butler -- opening doors, fetching beverages, and so on. Perhaps he's been reading some P. G. Wodehouse.

      --
      To err is human. To forgive is good system design.
    18. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really need to get those extra nipples removed. Just sayin'.

    19. Re:No. by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Such a predator might even cause a mass extinction of other species...

  49. Owning these things by clam666 · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you are spending this much time and energy owning, emoting, or analyzing a canine or feline instead of using all that wasted emotional energy on an actual human being, you are the problem.

    --
    I'm a satanic clam.
    1. Re:Owning these things by amn108 · · Score: 1

      I split the energy fifty-fifty

    2. Re:Owning these things by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least with my cat I am guaranteed to get a return on the energy spent; can't say the same about humans.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:Owning these things by tacarat · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot. That energy needs to be directed towards that run off power from a wall socket, not things with body heat and pulses.

      --
      "Common sense will be the death of us all"
    4. Re:Owning these things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they won't let us own human beings any more.

    5. Re:Owning these things by xmvince · · Score: 1

      i mean it only takes about 5 minutes to figure this one out. so if you really think this person can make that big of a difference in 5 minutes, then why don't you start it up?

  50. In response to your sig. by DigitalReverend · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In Soviet Russia, the government controls the commerce.

    Strange, just recently, here in the U.S. it has become that way as well.

    --
    I read Slashdot for the headlines, because the headlines, unlike the articles, are usually original and never duplicated
    1. Re:In response to your sig. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Really? How is the "gimme that dough for naught because I was too greedy or else I dump a shitload of unemployed, angry ex-workers on your head" we hear from businesses giving the government any control of it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  51. Another proof of intelligent design ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cats that make the most noise get fed most. Have the most offspring. Eventually dominate.

    Now if evolution would be true, then we would have cats premanently yowling like a siren from a firetruck.
    Thus there remains only the option of an intelligent designer who keeps the noise of these furbeasts at a tolerable level.

  52. Hallmarks of Felinity by reydelamirienda · · Score: 1
    Number 26: Saturation Purring

    I hope this was in the "Related work" section...

  53. Cats. The Fulcrum of Terror by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

    Yes, cats are manipulative. In fact, when cats purr, it means they are premeditating nefarious machinations with intent to destroy not only you, BUT ALL MANKIND!!1!

    Get a grip people.

  54. Meows are learned, why not purrs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember in South Africa I was told that African Wild Cats, and wild cats in general, don't vocalise in the same way that domestic cats do - unless they're brought into regular contact with humans, in which case they very quickly start to make typical "meow" noises, probably in response to human voices. The meows disappear within a generation if the cats are released back into the wild. However, the purr is common to wild and domesticated cats, and to big cats, so it does raise the question of whether it's natural selection or learning behaviour that leads to the "baby cry" component.

    1. Re:Meows are learned, why not purrs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big cats cannot purr.

  55. Feline control by Baseman · · Score: 1

    We could possibly call this pussy power....

    I have never observed our two cats (they are siblings) meowing to each other; But the male (Panther) usually is _not_ afraid to utter sound when he wants to be let out / in, or needs some attention - food that is.
    The female (Tiger) usually just inserts her claws into my toes when I'm sleeping... and get a very quick response.

    The cats are ~14 months old now, and I have submitted my will to their wants... They own me :-)

    -
    Base!

    1. Re:Feline control by CompMD · · Score: 1

      Please, please, please, tell me you are not naming your cats after Mac OS releases.

    2. Re:Feline control by Baseman · · Score: 1

      Please, please, please, tell me you are not naming your cats after Mac OS releases.

      Nope, they are named after appearance.
      I really didn't consider Mac OS's - I have never had a Mac in my house.
      Panther usually comes and steps on the keyboard when I'm trying to do some shell scripting....
      He prefers Linux and bash by the look of it. :-)

    3. Re:Feline control by CompMD · · Score: 1

      OK, you've made me feel much better, and that there is in fact hope for mankind. :)

  56. I'm a Bachleor and hate cats and kids by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

    so this purring doesn't work on me except to get me to toss em at the wall.

    --
    Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
    1. Re:I'm a Bachleor and hate cats and kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No dogs!"
      - obligatory IT Crowd reference

  57. Drilling by interactive_civilian · · Score: 1

    was the one who tagged this on drugs? hardware? power?

    It's because the cats are drilling. (watch from about 1:24)

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  58. Re:This explains everything by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Funny

    Interestingly enough, that is my house, except I'm the one with the cat. My wife often complains that I pay more attention to the cat.

    I'm so tempted to tell her that if she were cute and cuddly I'd pay more attention to her. That, and the cat doesn't mind when I pet her.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  59. It was a warning from the future by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    purrrrrrrrrrr......

    How are you Gentleman?

    All your base are belong to us

    you are on the way to destruction

    -CATS

  60. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    You seem to know nothing of cats. They don't rub to ask for food. They rub to mark territory (you) or family (your mother in law and your spouse). The difference in rubs: side of the mouth rub for territory, forehead bump/rub for family.

  61. Dark Angel by OfficialReverendStev · · Score: 1

    I dunno. We might also get Jessica Alba in heat every three months. This could work to our advantage...

    --
    A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Neitzsche
  62. I love cats because they have a well developed by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    theory of mind.

    For them to manipulate us, they've got to have some understanding of those things. I know my smarter cats do, and they make for great companions because of that.

  63. Occasionally true by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sometimes cats view people as other cats.

    I saw a special once where a bunch of female cats on a farm developed a community. They would feed each others kittens and arrange patrols to keep aggressive males away from the young. It was communal. They were a band of mothers doing a community job.

    And we have one cat here who decided same thing. We have three cats, two from a rescue shelter that were fixed as kittens, and one we found in our backyard pregnant. The cat that went through motherhood has mothering instincts, the other two do not.

    Two years ago my wife got pregnant.

    The mother cat knew exactly what was up, the other two did not. She would sit on her belly off to the side of the bulge and purr beside the child which would calm him down and make him sleep. She became very gingerly and delicate towards my wife. The other two didn't change their behavior - they'd step on my wife's belly and had no clue they were disturbing a baby.

    On the day the kid was born I stopped back from the hospital to feed the cats. I'm sure to a cat's senses I reeked of blood and birth. Mother cat was staring at me wild eyed with suspicion, taut as a bow string. I had never seen her so tense. I spoke to her in reassuring tones and let her smell my hands where I was holding the baby. As soon as she smelled "the baby is ok and dad here didn't hurt him" she took off like a rocket and ran laps around our house. She's very fat and I had honestly never seen her run before. The cat was celebrating. I know that seems unlikely and the sort of anthropomorphizing that pet owners often times overdo - but I swear...she was celebrating! She ran a few laps around the house, jumped on one of the other cats and went for a tumble, then started loving all over me. She knew. She is lethargic otherwise. A burst of energy from this cat is completely out of character. She knew.

    When the kid got home she "helped". You get a lot of visitors from people you don't see very often with a newborn in the house. Soon as one would show up, she would position herself near the baby, and *watch* the guest. Her intent was clear. "Harm that kid, do anything I don't like and I'll shred your face" It was the same pose and watchfulness she would do when her kittens were around (which we took to a no-kill shelter eventually - the same one we got our other two worthless cats from).

    And the cat would praise me for being a good parent. Male cats are more of a danger to kittens than a benefit. It seemed at first she was worried it was the same with people. Any time she'd see me being good to the kid (feeding/playing/whatever) she would make it a point to come up to me and love on me. Purr louder than a lawnmower and rub on my legs. She is a very vocal proponent of good parenting. Soon as I set the kid down she'd stop. Pick him back up, she's on again.

    But as for our other two cats - you're right. They definitely view us as parents, not equals. They will do that "kneading" thing with their front paws cats do when they sit on our laps. That's something kittens do to get more milk out of their mother. It's a baby reflex and they do it with us. But mom cat does not - she views us as fellow parents in the pack. So your observation is true if you have cats that have never been through parenthood, but occasionally that's not the case. YMMV though, of course. Cats are definitely unique individuals.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Occasionally true by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, 'house cats' (i.e. cats that are raised solely by humans) never mature 'mentally' and are basicly stuck as kids for their life, as such they see their humans as 'mother'. Cats that are raised by other cats and allowed to mature mentally (i.e. learn to hunt, learn how to take care of their own young, etc) don't have this disability and thus tend to see humans as 'part of the colony'.

      And while I don't want to take away from your feelings towards your cat, I have a feeling that when she smelt 'new birth and blood' on your hands the reason she did the laps around the house wasn't celebration but panic. In nature a male cat showing up with blood and birth smells means there is probably a kitten out there dead. Male cats aren't just "more of a danger than a benefit", they actively look for kittens and kill them as it brings the mothers into heat quicker.

      In it's head the cat was looking for where your wife 'hid' the baby so she could protect it from you.

    2. Re:Occasionally true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I understand, 'house cats' (i.e. cats that are raised solely by humans) never mature 'mentally' and are basicly stuck as kids for their life, as such they see their humans as 'mother'. Cats that are raised by other cats and allowed to mature mentally (i.e. learn to hunt, learn how to take care of their own young, etc) don't have this disability and thus tend to see humans as 'part of the colony'.

      Could this be related to cats being neutered or not?

    3. Re:Occasionally true by mseidl · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing reality with a Disney movie.

    4. Re:Occasionally true by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      Her intent was clear. "Harm that kid, do anything I don't like and I'll shred your face"

      In real science, you need a control group as well as an experimental group to make statements like that. I like the rest of the description in your story, but without evidence of a situation with a harmed baby and a shredded face, I think this part sticks out like a sore thumb as "wishful thinking" on your part.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    5. Re:Occasionally true by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

      Not so much. Animals have body language as well. Her body language was quite clear.

      "I'm watching you. Behave yourself."

      She is a very laid back and even shy animal. She only allows me and my wife to pet her - other people she doesn't trust enough. She was a stray cat and we two were her first introduction to humanity. She trusts us, and not others. We get company and she hides.

      Until the baby.

      When the kid was an infant she changed her behavior to a more aggressive posture. She would sit in between guests and the kid. And stare. And she was tense. She had that body posture that cats get when they spot a field mouse. That sort of taut watchfulness that says "I can pounce on a microsecond's notice." She was ready for instant action, and didn't mind letting the whole world know.

      So yeah, not as good as a control but I know my cats. She was good natured about it, she'd swish her tail and be happy when we had guests. But she would make her presence known, and her body posture was "I'm ready for action" which is a 180 degree reversal from her behavior before.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    6. Re:Occasionally true by Weaselmancer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      From what I understand, 'house cats' (i.e. cats that are raised solely by humans) never mature 'mentally' and are basicly stuck as kids for their life, as such they see their humans as 'mother'. Cats that are raised by other cats and allowed to mature mentally (i.e. learn to hunt, learn how to take care of their own young, etc) don't have this disability and thus tend to see humans as 'part of the colony'

      That makes perfect sense. I've heard the same thing about dogs - basically if they have people to raise them they remain mentally a puppy. That's why they bark. Youthful exuberance, like how puppies will yip and run in circles. It's puppy behavior.

      And while I don't want to take away from your feelings towards your cat, I have a feeling that when she smelt 'new birth and blood' on your hands the reason she did the laps around the house wasn't celebration but panic. In nature a male cat showing up with blood and birth smells means there is probably a kitten out there dead. Male cats aren't just "more of a danger than a benefit", they actively look for kittens and kill them as it brings the mothers into heat quicker.

      Yeah, I know that about male cats. And when I first showed up she was staring at me with a sort of horrified intensity. I'm sure that was the first thought on her mind.

      But you would have had to have seen her to understand. She wasn't hauling ass around looking for anything. She did circles around the living room. Pure speed, no searching for anything. I've seen her when she panics. Being a former outdoor cat when we have a thunderstorm she does indeed panic. It's unmistakable. The body language is totally different.

      This was not panic. It was joy, or as close to that feeling as a cat can get and display. She ran laps, pounced on another house cat and rolled around with her, loved on me a bunch then had dinner.

      I agree that on the face of it your explanation is more likely, but if you had seen her you'd know that just wasn't the case. And it went from there. This bizarre cat actually tries to encourage me to be a good parent. When I play with my kid or show affection she makes it a point to love on me. She knows deep down that males are dangerous to children, so she does her best to reinforce behavior in me that she sees as beneficial to the baby.

      I know how unlikely it all sounds, so I don't blame your skepticism one bit.

      --
      Weaselmancer
      rediculous.
    7. Re:Occasionally true by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      In real science, you need a control group as well as an experimental group to make statements like that.

      Yes, real scientists ALWAYS have controls before they make statements like this *snicker*.

      And this is meant to be a scientific finding. He's planning on submitting that post to Nature in fact.

    8. Re:Occasionally true by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the humor... no experimenter would order a subject to hurt a kid in order to test if a cat will shred the subject's face.

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    9. Re:Occasionally true by zoloto · · Score: 1

      My mother had a female dalmation who was VERY much the same way in regards to her 'caring' and 'protective' nature both during the pregnancy and of me after I was born. A stranger to her would come into the house and stand right in between me and who ever was there and growled if they tried to approach me.

      They caught a home video in the 70's of this happening and wow it's friggin awesome to see it in action NOW with some siblings kids and their motherly like pets! :)

    10. Re:Occasionally true by Whitemage12380 · · Score: 1

      That's cute and awesome, thanks for sharing.

    11. Re:Occasionally true by xmvince · · Score: 1

      The only advantage we have over cats is the ability to communicate with a complex language, and our bigger brain enables us to remember more things. That being said, we still don't know all the functions of our brains so there still could be advantages we have in our brains that cause us to be smarter, but overall language and our strong memories are what makes us "intelligent".

    12. Re:Occasionally true by chris.evans · · Score: 1

      Animals are people. I one saw a blue-jay, land on the mobile home awning and communicate with its "wing features" and I knew exactly what she was saying... And trust me, they do not like our society. esp. cars and roads. Evolution people, it is real, and true. And you can communicate with out words, and eye sight alone. A full fucking conversion too.

    13. Re:Occasionally true by jackbox · · Score: 1

      I believe all of this. I've owned many cats in my life. (We have three now.) The story about the cat celebrating is particularly resounding. What amazes me is when "scientists" observe animals behaving in sophisticated ways and wonder what's going on.

      Enjoy your family... and the cats.

  64. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I must confess to not knowing a whole lot about Rats either.

    You seem to know about cats, how do I keep them, and their shit out of my garden, other than using a BB gun ?

  65. Cats playing fetch by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    I have one cat that plays fetch with itself.

    Give her a hi-bounce ball, the little elastic balls that you get for pocket change out of vending machines at the store. She'll pick it up and carry it to the top of the stairs. Then swat it and watch it bounce down the stairs. Soon as it gets to the bottom she'll haul ass and pounce on it. Carry it back to the top and repeat.

    First time I caught her doing it I was on my computer around 1 am. I kept hearing *boomp*..*boomp*...*boomp boompboomp*...boomp... I couldn't figure out what the hell I was hearing. It was the cat bouncing the ball down the wooden stairs to the basement.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  66. And who do you think domesticated *who*? by whitroth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Come on - we partnered with dogs 70k years ago or so, and what happened? We sat around, scratched/licked our private parts, hunted (a little), and hung out and told stories.

    Then, maybe 12k-20k years ago, cats domesticated us, and the next thing you know, we're doing agriculture, and building civilization... so that they could live in the manner in which they intended to become accustomed.

    It's all their fault...

                        mark

    --
    The truth will out: someone got it at last:
          Dogs have masters; cats have staff.

  67. Re: better link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  68. Preventive kicking by ecorreia · · Score: 1

    This is why I normally use and recommend preventive kicking with cats, lest they hypnotize you with their little cute purrrrrrrrs...

    1. Re:Preventive kicking by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      This is why I normally use and recommend preventive kicking with cats, lest they hypnotize you with their little cute purrrrrrrrs...

      I don't find that amusing at all! Hurting an animal is a sign of sociopathy!

  69. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Whorhay · · Score: 1

    To which my response is always a strong shove away. I am no cat's property or territory.

  70. In other news... by diakka · · Score: 1

    Owners may have suspected as much, but it seems our own human babies have found ways to manipulate their owners. Researchers have discovered that human babies use crying, begging, laughing, acting cute and sad eyes in order to overpower their owners and garner attention and food.

    --
    -- Knowledge shared is power lost. -- Aleister Crowley
  71. Punishing a cat. by wfstanle · · Score: 1

    More to the point...
    Say a cat jumps on a table and you punish the cat for jumping on the table. Does this deter the cat from jumping on the table? Probably not because the cat is likely to misinterpret what the punishment was for. Sometimes the cat thinks that it is a no-no to be CAUGHT jumping on the table. Jumping on the table is fine, just don't be caught doing so.

    1. Re:Punishing a cat. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Exactly. They learn it's not okay to jump on the table when the human is present. When the human is gone, they own the house.

  72. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Hatta · · Score: 1

    I have never fed it, I simply push it away (Gently, my mother in law seems to be fond of it) but after many years of being pushed away it still tries. It has the learning power of a sheep.

    Oh, it learns. Cats know who doesn't like them, and take pleasure in annoying them.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  73. Grrr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn script kitties.

  74. Do dogs love their owners? by Yhippa · · Score: 1

    I've read a little bit about this and I have a theory that (similar to cats) dogs act in a why that could be perceived as caring or love for their owner but are really trying to give the impression to their owner that they are only doing that because whenever they cuddle up to their owner or roll over to be petted that it somehow increases the chances that there will be food in the bowl in the morning and evening.

  75. DOH! by VinB · · Score: 1

    Purring! Of course! And all this time I thought my cat had wicked gas! Boy do I feel silly.

  76. Are you sure? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Are you sure it's the cat copying the baby, or is it the baby copyoing the cat?

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  77. Cat on "Red Dwarf"? by wfstanle · · Score: 1

    You seem to be referring to Cat on "Red Dwarf"?

    1. Re:Cat on "Red Dwarf"? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Yep.

  78. Cats aren't friends. by BitZtream · · Score: 0, Troll

    They aren't, sorry. A cat considers itself better than you, and in 99 out of a 100 cases of cat owners, the cat IS better than the owner.

    Cats manipulate their owners on a regular basis, pretty much their entire lives. The only reason it tolerates you is because its easier than the alternative.

    They don't like you, they never will, and the instant they realize you are dead they will proceed to eat you.

    Most cat owners think cats can't be trained, this is simply false. Its not that they can't be trained its that their owners are too stupid and the end result is that the cat owner gets trained and the cat does whatever the hell it wants.

    Treat a cat the same way you treat a dog and things are a whole different world. Treat a dog the same way you treat a cat and once again, you'll get walked on.

    Cats aren't special, 99 out of 100 cat people are simply retarded. Sorry for all of you that this pisses off, but its true. I've never met a cat that couldn't be trained once its retarded owner who would let it do whatever the hell it wanted was out of the picture. Take the pushover owner out of the picture, show the cat you are in charge, not it, and the world changes.

    This is roughly the same as children. Ever notice that cat owners with kids also typically have brats for children? Neither the cat nor the child is the problem, the adult is just incapable of commanding respect out of others.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Cats aren't friends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cool story bro

  79. Overlords by ronin-pt · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new pussy overlords... oh wait...

  80. I, for one, welcome our new cat overlords. by Burl+Ives · · Score: 1

    I'd like to remind them that as a trusted engineer, I can be helpful in using can openers to open tasty cat food items.

  81. Turnabout is fair play by kalyptein · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend can produce a high-pitched meow that sounds rather kittenish. It's like a harpoon in her cat's brain; he has no choice to come over and investigate, regardless of where he was and what he was doing.

    His brain is also kind of like an etch-a-sketch. If he's in a bad mood you can shake his head vigorously and he forgets what was going on.

    --
    Entropy gets everyone.
  82. That Explains... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why most guys dislike cats and women like them :)

  83. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I vaguely remember reading about something called transference, I think the idea was that people attributed their own attributes and personalities to in-animate objects, or animals.

    Do you take pleasure in annoying people ?

    From the cat's point of view, it's a risky strategy, It can have no idea of where the boundaries of my forbearance might lie, at some point it may get a large pot of cold water dumped on it.

    That may not stop it rubbing up against me, but I'll feel better. I can be petty (shrug)

  84. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Schadrach · · Score: 1

    Depending on the situation, this might be indicative of another cat behavior I've seen a lot: When a cat is in a room with a bunch of people it isn't very familiar with, it tends to go to the one who doesn't like cats. What it's really doing is going to the person who scares it the least, because all these strange people keep making noises at it and trying to paw at it, whereas only one person doesn't seem as threatening

  85. As my dad likes to say... by EventHorizon_pc · · Score: 1

    Dogs look at you and think "you feed me, you clean me, you pick up after me... you must be god!"
    Cats look at you and think "you feed me, you clean me, you pick up after me... I must be god!"

  86. Re:Cats are stupid as sheep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think he meant the cat owner is the arse.

  87. Ugly the cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Everyone in the apartment complex I lived in knew who Ugly was. Ugly was the resident tomcat. Ugly loved three things in this world: fighting, eating garbage, and, shall we say, love.

    The combination of these things combined with a life spent outside had their effect on Ugly. To start with, he had only one eye and where the other should have been was a hole. He was also missing his ear on the same side, his left foot appeared to have been badly broken at one time, and had healed at an unnatural angle, making him look like he was always turning the corner.

    Ugly would have been a dark gray tabby, striped type, except for the sores covering his head, neck, and even his shoulders

    Every time someone saw Ugly there was the same reaction. "That's one UGLY cat!!!"

    All the children were warned not to touch him, the adults threw rocks at him, hosed him down, squirted him when he tried to come in their homes, or shut his paws in the door when he would not leave. Ugly always had the same reaction.

    If you turned the hose on him, he would stand there, getting soaked until you gave up and quit. If you threw things at him, he would curl his lanky body around your feet in forgiveness.

    Whenever he spied children, he would come running, meowing frantically and bump his head against their hands, begging for their love.

    If you ever picked him up he would immediately begin suckling on your shirt, earrings, whatever he could find.

    One day Ugly shared his love with the neighbor's dogs. They did not respond kindly, and Ugly was badly mauled. I tried to rush to his aid. By the time I got to where he was laying, it was apparent Ugly's sad life was almost at an end.

    As I picked him up and tried to carry him home, I could hear him wheezing and gasping, and could feel him struggling. It must be hurting him terribly, I thought.

    Then I felt a familiar tugging, sucking sensation on my ear. Ugly, in so much pain, suffering and obviously dying, was trying to suckle my ear. I pulled him closer to me, and he bumped the palm of my hand with his head, then he turned his one golden eye towards me, and I could hear the distinct sound of purring.

    Even in the greatest pain, that ugly battled scarred cat was asking only for a little affection, perhaps some compassion.

    At that moment I thought Ugly was the most beautiful, loving creature I had ever seen. Never once did he try to bite or scratch me, try to get away from me, or struggle in any way. Ugly just looked up at me completely trusting in me to relieve his pain.

    Ugly died in my arms before I could get inside, but I sat and held him for a long time afterwards, thinking about how one scarred, deformed little stray could so alter my opinion about what it means to have true pureness of spirit, to love so totally and truly.

    Ugly taught me more about giving and compassion than a thousand books, lectures, or talk show specials ever could, and for that I will always be thankful. He had been scarred on the outside, but I was scarred on the inside, and it was time for me to move on and learn to love truly and deeply. To give my total to those I cared for.

    Many people want to be richer, more successful, well liked, beautiful, but for me... I will always try to be Ugly.

  88. well i have a cat too by deepsight · · Score: 1

    and he is certainly not exploiting me at al^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Illegal instruction (core dumped)

  89. bitch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah this is a little more subtle than my cat that is like "bitch get in the kitchen and make me a sandwich".

  90. In Soviet Russia... by t.lark · · Score: 1

    ...YOU own CAT!

  91. Well by MessedRocker · · Score: 1

    After reading this article, I decided to go pet my cat. She's so adorable with her purring. I feel like feeding her now.

  92. I smell a lawsuit coming on ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    in other news: nbauman gets bit by squirrel; blames mcgrew, slashdot user.

    mcgrew .. known as the user who had an accident forgetting his disclaimer ...

    squirrels are wmd's after all...

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  93. LoLCats anyone? by Nammut · · Score: 1

    I'm in your mindz, controlling you with my purs!

  94. Re:Thorndike, Skinner, other Psychologists disagre by hesiod · · Score: 1

    You think that's impressive, Schroedinger trained his cat to get in a box and stop existing!

  95. Christian and the Lion by improfane · · Score: 1

    No, big cats can be just like domestic cats. Watch this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xr1pWzoLvT8

    These two guys raised this lion from a cub in their apartment until it got too big. They released it to the wild.

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,