Slashdot Mirror


Woman Fired For Using Uppercase In Email

tomachi writes "An accountant in NZ has been awarded $17,000 NZD for unfair dismissal after her boss fired her without warning for using uppercase letters in a single email to co-workers. The email, which advises her team how to fill out staff claim forms, specifies a time and date highlighted in bold red, and a sentence written in capitals and highlighted in bold blue. It reads: 'To ensure your staff claim is processed and paid, please do follow the below checklist.' Her boss deemed the capital letters too confrontational for her co-workers to read after they woke up from naptime."

364 comments

  1. DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by HiChris! · · Score: 0, Troll

    FOR USING ALL CAPS

    1. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      you sir are fired.

    2. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by SQLGuru · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think her boss was e.e.cummings.

    3. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Funny

      BUT EVERYONE LIKES B1FF'S POSTS!

      (filter food)

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Funny

      i think her boss was e.e. cummings.

      FTFY.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      I think her boss was named Humphrey Jass (aka Hugh Jass). ;-) Also what's up with that measly fine? Given the poor economy it will probably take her a year to find another job, so she should receive one year's salary. (IMHO). Teach these corporations not to mistreat the citizens.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Informative

      Also what's up with that measly fine? Given the poor economy it will probably take her a year to find another job, so she should receive one year's salary. (IMHO). Teach these corporations not to mistreat the citizens.

      She has already found another job. She was only out of work for 6 months.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    7. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      e e cummings

      He hated punctuation & diacriticals too.

      FTFY,

    8. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      .... I hate manure?

    9. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      BUT EVRY1 LIEKS B1FF'S PO$TS!

      (filter food)

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      $ make available
    10. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She has already found another job. She was only out of work for 6 months

      ...who was fired in December 2007... ...but she says she didn't find fulltime work until October 2008.
      Where did you get 6 months from?

    11. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by master5o1 · · Score: 0

      This is New Zealand we are talking about. $15,000 is one year salary.

      --
      signature is pants
    12. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      Wait... $17,000? I'm sure I read it as $15,000 yesterday from the article (Maybe I should have re-read the nzherald page)

      --
      signature is pants
    13. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I'm no physicist, but the months may be shorter and/or follow a different sequence "down under". It is unsafe to assume that your understanding of the space/time continuum applies everywhere......

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    14. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am a physicist. No I don't have a point, but bragging on Slashdot is about as useful as this degree will ever be

    15. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

      The irony is amazing.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    16. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by PRMan · · Score: 1

      $17,000 NZD= $15,000 USD?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    17. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by master5o1 · · Score: 1

      No no..NZ Herald would report it in NZD. I just read it wrong and only realised *after* I posted and read it a bit in the summary :|

      --
      signature is pants
    18. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by vyruss000 · · Score: 1

      Or k.d. lang :)

    19. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by FelixNZ · · Score: 1

      Even in NZD$, you're not far off!

    20. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Blain · · Score: 1

      anyone lived in a pretty how town
      by e e cummings

      anyone lived in a pretty how town
      (with up so floating many bells down)
      spring summer autumn winter
      he sang his didn't he danced his did

      Women and men (both little and small)
      cared for anyone not at all
      they sowed their isn't they reaped their same
      sun moon stars rain

      children guessed (but only a few
      and down they forgot as up they grew
      autumn winter spring summer)
      that noone loved him more by more

      when by now and tree by leaf
      she laughed his joy she cried his grief
      bird by snow and stir by still
      anyone's any was all to her

      someones married their everyones
      laughed their cryings and did their dance
      (sleep wake hope and then) they
      said their nevers they slept their dream

      stars rain sun moon
      (and only the snow can begin to explain
      how children are apt to forget to remember
      with up so floating many bells down)

      one day anyone died i guess
      (and noone stooped to kiss his face)
      busy folk buried them side by side
      little by little and was by was

      all by all and deep by deep
      and more by more they dream their sleep
      noone and anyone earth by april
      wish by spirit and if by yes.

      Women and men(both dong and ding)
      summer autumn winter spring
      reaped their sowing and went their came
      sun moon stars rain

    21. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Blain · · Score: 0

      My bad -- I noticed the "W" in the last stanza a portion of a second after "submit."  Sorry.

    22. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BUT EVERYONE LIEKS MUDKIPZ!

      ftfy (Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.)

    23. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by aqk · · Score: 0

      I think her boss was e.e.cummings.
      Strangely enough, she happens to be a big fan of K. D. LANG

    24. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

      With really annoying (and recurring) issues, it would be so tempting to write filters for special situations (text that is 85% or more in caps gets a bounce back, certain words get filtered to another word...)

      Or even better, special filters, for "special" people.

    25. Re:DO I GET MODDED DOWN NOW? by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm no physicist, but the months may be shorter and/or follow a different sequence "down under"

      I'm no physicist either, but I am downunder. Anyhow, I don't get it, what's difficult to understand here?! Can you guys up top not count?!

      She was sacked December '07 and got a job in October '08. So that would be March, June, April, November, January, August, she was out of work, no? That's six months in my book!

      Sheesh, stupid topsiders!

      --
      Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke
  2. Time to fire all lawyers by hernick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, the time has to come fire all lawyers who use ALL CAPS when writing their contracts and EULAs!

    1. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      s/ who use ALL CAPS when writing their contracts and EULAs//g

    2. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by rssrss · · Score: 5, Informative

      Unfortunately, it is required by law in certain contract clauses:

      See, e.g. Uniform Commercial Code Section 2-316 (2) requirement that exclusions of warranties be "conspicuous" and the definition of that word at Sec. 1-201 (b)(10).

      Sorry to go statutory on you, but I don't like all caps any more than you do.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    3. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Which means that we get to fire them all!!!!

    4. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to the code you cite, bold, italic, colored, or merely larger are all acceptable ways to make a section conspicuous, whereas the only mention of all caps is for headings. There is no technological justification for using all caps for body text that is required to be emphasized, and it could be said that doing so is actually rather nefarious, given that all caps is second only to poor color choice as a way to make text both noticeable and unreadable.

    5. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by retchdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Caps remain caps if read without HTML-formatting?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    6. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Try to make text bold, italic, colored or merely larger in a pure text file. Good luck!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by reebmmm · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a lawyer, and I'll be the first to admit that many of my colleagues do little to help themselves when it comes to being end user friendly. The blocks of all caps being a sure symptom of that. A site about contract drafting style actually had a pretty good discussion regarding the conspicuousness requirements and the use of all caps: http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/02/04/all-capitals/

      In my opinion, the all caps paragraphs are merely remnants from a time when contracts were drafted without the assistance of word processors capable of doing bold face type. And, frankly, that wasn't that long ago. Many lawyers that I know continue to cut and paste the boilerplate language or modify the boilerplate language keeping in tact whatever drafting convention was used originally.

      That said, there is also some advantage to using all caps over bold face for when it comes to OCR, text translation, format-less archiving, etc. In that case, the "conspicuousness" is maintained (i.e., all caps), even if the formatting is dropped. It's a very weak advantage.

    8. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone lost his brain...

    9. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by teh+kurisu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually the reason for all caps in legal documents is that certain parts of the text are required to have greater visual emphasis relative to the rest of the document, as they tend to be the important parts. If you're working in plain text then all caps is your only option.

      I'm sure that the fact that all caps is harder to read hasn't escaped the notice of these bloodsuckers either.

    10. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Who says you need to use
      a pure text file?

      P.S. Is there any word on
      when Slashdot is going to
      get around to fixing the
      comment field width in
      the Idle section?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by byuu · · Score: 5, Funny

      Good point. How about using Kirby for emphasis instead?

      )>^_^)> The software is provided "as is" and the author <(^_^(<
      )>^_^)> disclaims all warranties with regard to this    <(^_^(<
      )>^_^)> software including all implied warranties of    <(^_^(<
      )>^_^)> merchantability and fitness.                    <(^_^(<

    12. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by numbski · · Score: 1

      Y'know, I hadn't even thought about that. I'm just on the boderline between generations of users to where I learned to type on an electric keyboard, not a computer. You're right about boldface typing. I had completely forgotten about it. We were taught to type all-caps, then back up and typeover again, providing all-cap bolded text.

      Oops. :P

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    13. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "Yes, the time has to come fire all lawyers who use ALL CAPS when writing their contracts and EULAs!"

      Um, no, they have a good reason for using all caps.

      But I don't understand this story, the boss can not fire his employee for using all caps in a email? Why not? I guess laws are different in New Zealand, but this has got to be one of the most ridiculous job lawsuits I've ever heard.. Don't think she'd get a dime in the US of A.

      FTFA: "She had also acted provocatively in seeking to view complaints laid against her by colleagues."

      If I was her boss I probably would have fired her too.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    14. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      NZ is probably right-to-work rather than employment-at-will. There are states in the USA that require a good legal reason to fire someone.

    15. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by liam193 · · Score: 1

      Why not use something like:

      This is a less important part of the contract

      ---- Start of Conspicuous Text ---
      This product is provided "as is".. .. ..
      --- End of Conspicuous Text ---

      Another less important part of the contract.

    16. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      There is no technological justification for using all caps for body text that is required to be emphasized, and it could be said that doing so is actually rather nefarious, given that all caps is second only to poor color choice as a way to make text both noticeable and unreadable.

      It could also be said that Lawyers are a conservative lot and still not used to the modern world, where you can just go and bold a section with little effort. Also, all caps survives cut and paste into notepad.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    17. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by dotgain · · Score: 1
      Not long after the National Party took over they introduced the 'Fire at will' bill allowing employers a 90-day period to discharge an employee without notice or reason.

      Hasn't changed the fact that all of the employers I've had have been too shit scared to do anything about even the most useless of staff - even when it's clear a $20,000 settlement will still probably be better than retaining the employee.

      Approximately 75% of cases of unjustified dismissal are found against the employer.

    18. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      Actually the reason for all caps in legal documents is that certain parts of the text are required to have greater visual emphasis relative to the rest of the document

      They should really drop the caps and write these parts across bare female breasts. The legal industry's reputation would surge to new highs virtually overnight.

    19. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by KGIII · · Score: 1

      And far more people would read the EULA.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    20. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      If you care about emphasis surviving conversion to plain text, why not just break down and use ASCII art to indent the paragraph and put a box around it? That wouldn't have to kill readability, but it could make the paragraph very conspicuous.

    21. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by theskipper · · Score: 2, Funny

      s/ who use ALL CAPS when writing their contracts and EULAs/ out of a 700lb cannon/g

      FTFY.

    22. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      certain parts of the text are required to have greater visual emphasis relative to the rest of the document

      Except, this fails itself far too often. I've seen many a EULA where the cap text outnumbers the properly capitalized text. When you emphasize nearly everything, the relative emphasis is gone. What you're left with is something barely readable.

      Documents such as the EULA are supposed to be written with the reader - a non-lawyer - in mind. Since the target audience for many tech-related EULA is typically 20-40, and since most techies in that age group have gotten to where they glaze over the fully capitalized text, at this point doing it really serves the opposite - it deemphasizes things.

    23. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by lgw · · Score: 1

      That is *way* more readible than the typical warrentee clause. I think you're on to somthing!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    24. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.C.C is not a statute it is a model for states to base statutes upon.

    25. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Bai+jie · · Score: 1

      "I'm not reading the EULA, I'm only looking at it for the pictures!"

    26. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then the entire document end up being 'more important', hence everything is in caps... and you get the 'boy who cried wolf' effect...

      bleh lawyers *.

      *) in this context, the term 'lawyers' including those who practice** it, those who write it, those who review it, those who influence it, those who lobby for/against it, those who vote on it, and those who judge and sentence based on it. yes all of them, all bleh.

      **) why is it called 'practice' anyway, isn't it for real? are they play-lawmen? do they operate around 'practice/play courts'?***

      ***) too much recursion

      ****) bleh dangling link.

      *****) bleh message suppressed after 1 times.

    27. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by ardle · · Score: 1

      certain parts of the text are required to have greater visual emphasis relative to the rest of the document, as they tend to be the important parts

      Is this a legal requirement?

    28. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious - how does that all work out in Braille?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    29. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Kreigaffe · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's the quietest yelling you've ever read.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    30. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 1

      Documents such as the EULA are supposed to be written with the reader - a non-lawyer - in mind.

      Good one. Thought you were being serious there for a second.

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    31. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      word wrapping makes that stuff look like ass. Ever seen a deep usenet thread?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    32. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by fibonacci8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could be a lot more concise by replacing 99% of legal documents with the following:

      t(^_^t)

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    33. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Samah · · Score: 1

      Damn you! I'm currently reading this in a training session and the presenter just gave me strange looks after giggling at your post.
      -1: STOP MAKING ME LAUGH DAMNIT... (oops, now I've been fired)

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    34. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by theillien · · Score: 1

      Well, there certainly would be a "surge". Perhaps to new highs but I'm sure just to average highs.

    35. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      You could be a lot more concise by replacing 99% of legal documents with the following:

      tl;dr

      FTFY

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    36. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by darthvader100 · · Score: 1

      Damn, but i wish i had Mod points. This is so accurate of just about every EULA....

    37. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by recrudescence · · Score: 0

      what is this font, please? :)

    38. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Oops, I mean lol.

    39. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather use Kibo.

    40. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Someone doesn't know CSS.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    41. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the all caps paragraphs are merely remnants from a time when contracts were drafted without the assistance of word processors capable of doing bold face type. And, frankly, that wasn't that long ago.

      Yea, they've only had what, like almost 30 years to get with the program. ;)

      Having more than a few legal clients, I have to say that they are among the most technically inept bunch out there.

      A notable exception is my own lawyer, by no accident.

    42. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Interesting - I just checked with someone who works for the Department of Labour AND the Department of Labour website, and they don't publish statistics (or in fact apparently even keep track of them) about how many cases are found in whose favour. Where, pray tell, did you pull that figure from?

      Also, the 90 day trial amendment only applies if the employer has less than 20 staff - so that might explain why no one uses it.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    43. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by ztransform · · Score: 1

      Many lawyers that I know continue to cut and paste the boilerplate language or modify the boilerplate language keeping in tact whatever drafting convention was used originally.

      As someone who signs contracts (as every adult does) I feel obligated to read and understand every line that I am committing to. But I often get harassed by agents who don't want to wait while I absorb the contract. Even worse when I challenge any particular clause; very few agents/businesses can handle their own legal documentation and greatly fear repercussions should the contract change in any way.

      All I'm saying is that I don't honestly believe most lawyers actually understand their own contracts.

    44. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      There's a street in Cincinnati named Eula Ave. And for years, it was shown on maps sites as EULA Ave. (all caps), while all surrounding streets were in Title Case.

      I think the lawyers got into the mapping software, too.

    45. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by it0 · · Score: 1

      Then why are all the opt-out clauses in smaller letters?

    46. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just Courier New. Use options and choose "code" to get it.

    47. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that's what they would be doing...

    48. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by operagost · · Score: 1

      I type up all my contracts like this:

      ---------------------

      Less important stuff.

      <marquee><blink>More important stuff!</blink></marquee>

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    49. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by dotgain · · Score: 1

      I won't repeat myself - you'll find where I 'pulled that figure' in my response to your other (practically identical) post.

    50. Re:Time to fire all lawyers by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      I didn't say they are written that way. In fact, I was very clearly stating that they aren't written that way. What I said was, they are supposed to be written that way.

  3. Wow. by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is actually one of the better formatted emails I've seen. Much as I dislike off-like emails, it's verging on good information design rather than offensiveness or even ugliness.

    Also... when did people stop understanding the word "please"?

    1. Re:Wow. by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      "office-like", even.

      I'm blaming my keyboard.

      Hmm. She really should have blamed the company for supplying her with a faulty keyboard ;)

    2. Re:Wow. by gruvmeister · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And there will still be people who read that email and either miss the deadline or don't follow the instructions.

    3. Re:Wow. by Anonymous+Struct · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Sure, you think that now, but try reading it after naptime.

    4. Re:Wow. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I agree. What she did was equivalent to what you see in many, many documents:

      - SECTION TITLE

      - checklist

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Wow. by WraithCube · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also... when did people stop understanding the word "please"?

      Apparently some people decided that "please" makes it sound like its optional. Thus if you put please in it less people listen. Stupid I know, but true nonetheless.

    6. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently "please" is a snide and rude comment LOL

    7. Re:Wow. by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      TRWTF is that they get naps! Even daycare workers don't get naptime along with the kids (woah there, keep it G-rated). Although I sometimes feel like I work in a daycare, I don't get naps either. Do I have to move to NZ to get a job where I can take a nap?

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    8. Re:Wow. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Also... when did people stop understanding the word "please"?

      When they started spelling it "puh-LEASE!" it kind of lost all meaning.

    9. Re:Wow. by compro01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just find a company that has a clue and cares with respect to actual work done per dollar productivity. There have been multiple studies that have found a nap in the afternoon substantially boosts alertness and productivity, so the employer gets more work done for their money and the employees are also generally happier.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    10. Re:Wow. by iYk6 · · Score: 1

      The email was meant to be informative, not magical.

    11. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP!

    12. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the land of the Clean Green Lie this is no surprise. You can't shock the micromanaged sheep after their hibernation / lunchbreak.

      Full Disclosure - I moved to NZ 2 years ago. Its a 3rd world circus act.

    13. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's kind of like the weirdness associated with ASAP. When you say "this needs to be done as soon as possible" it probably won't get done, at least not for a while. When you say "this needs to be done ASAP" it does get done for some reason right away. They mean the same thing but the acronym gets better results.

    14. Re:Wow. by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Its a 3rd world circus act.

      I have lived in NZ my entire life and I can attest this statement is the most correct, concise description of our country.

      My son broke his arm on Sunday. First thing I did was get online to see if there were any reasonably priced flights to countries with real hospitals full of real doctors.

    15. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First thing I did was get online to see if there were any reasonably priced flights to countries with real hospitals full of real doctors." WOW! Listen up USA. This is right where you'll be with nationalized health care.

    16. Re:Wow. by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      There will be still more people who simply didn't bother to read it.

    17. Re:Wow. by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Do I have to move to NZ to get a job where I can take a nap?

      Would a siesta suffice? If so look no further than Mexico.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    18. Re:Wow. by Seumas · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Right, because if there's one thing that's needed after a rough four or five hours of being awake, it's a nice long nap. I mean, gosh. FOUR HOURS. That's just exhausting. I bet people need a second nap after the second four hours of work before that long ride home.

    19. Re:Wow. by Eivind · · Score: 1

      It depends, doesn't it ?

      I generally get up around 6am, and start at 8. (the two hours before are spent taking a shower, eating breakfast with my family, dress and prepare my 3 kids and bring them to childcare, then head to work.

      By 2pm, I've been busy for 8 hours straight. I generally don't bother taking a nap, since workday is over by 4 in the normal case anyway. But I can tell you I'm definitely less efficient those last couple of hours.

    20. Re:Wow. by tygerstripes · · Score: 1

      Yeah, okay, but the boss who gives you a nap also seems to be the dickbag who fires you for trying to write clear and appropriately highlighted instructions for the sake of your brain-dead colleagues who will still get it wrong. $17,000? A law firm should know better.

      --
      Meta will eat itself
    21. Re:Wow. by geekoid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Did you read the studies, or jump right to being a douche bag?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  4. WELL *I* DON'T CARE! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    Anyone who has ever been fired for shouting is going to have no sympathy for this woman.

  5. Whew! by R2.0 · · Score: 1

    Almost commented before I saw it was under Idle.

    What?

    Shit!

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    1. Re:Whew! by owlnation · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "Almost commented before I saw it was under Idle."

      I thought Idle had died. It's mercifully kept a low profile for a few months. (Although, sadly samzenpus has occasionally been polluting regular /. with Idle articles.)

      Again, for the love of all things sacred, please take IDLE our of the main /. RSS feed.

      That is only fair. Those that like Idle can read it, those of us who cannot stand it, need never waste our time with it.

  6. WTF! by Tobenisstinky · · Score: 1

    THAT'S UNBELIEVEABLE!

    --
    wha'? where am i?
  7. hehehe by Normal+Dan · · Score: 4, Funny

    hehehe HAHAH heeheeeheeeheee HAHAHAHAAHAA!!!
    *sigh* heh... naptime?... confrontational?... heheh.... I don't know where to start... hehehe..
    *sigh* OK, I'm done.

    --
    A unique way to learn a language: http://languageloom.com
    1. Re:hehehe by leromarinvit · · Score: 1

      Since you wrote about 10% of this post in all-caps, you're fired. Have a nice day.

      --
      Proud member of the Ferengi Socialist Party.
    2. Re:hehehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Play a game that's hard to lose: You Win

      Nice game, but the correct spelling is "Congratulations."

  8. Darn you, Slashdot! :-) by aardwolf64 · · Score: 4, Informative

    See what you did? You made me RTFA just to see if it actually mentioned naps (it doesn't, btw.)

    1. Re:Darn you, Slashdot! :-) by BeatYaBad · · Score: 1

      LMAO. I read it for the same reason.

    2. Re:Darn you, Slashdot! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would you actually read all of it? open the page, ctrl-f and enter "naptime". no search results

    3. Re:Darn you, Slashdot! :-) by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Open the page? Don't you have wget and grep?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Darn you, Slashdot! :-) by element-o.p. · · Score: 0

      What, your browser doesn't start searching as soon as you hit the "/" key? That's so....Windows! :D

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    5. Re:Darn you, Slashdot! :-) by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are more geekier than I :)

      Not only did you beat me to the punch, but you one-upped me as well. I'm ashamed I didn't think of that myself :(

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    6. Re:Darn you, Slashdot! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever you do, don't hit Napslock~~~zzzzzzzzz

    7. Re:Darn you, Slashdot! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, now I don't need to RTFA. I'm far too lazy and need a nap >_

  9. NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    CAPSLOCK: IT'S CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL!

    My bad, Filtering error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    I'm going to sue Slashdot for discrimination!

    1. Re:NO by doctorfaustus · · Score: 1

      >>>Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

      But it's really not like yelling. So no need to get upset about it, ever. That's just a web myth, a fantasy. Quit spreading it.

  10. There must be more to this story... by Zen+Hash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clearly, there must be more to this story... The email excerpt alone is hardly "confrontational".

    I'd bet there was a more personal confrontation, possibly with a superior, and that email was simply seen as a better excuse to get rid of her than the real reason.

    --
    Here I sit, all broken hearted.
    Came to poop, but only farted.
    1. Re:There must be more to this story... by ktappe · · Score: 5, Informative
      If you RTA, there was more to the story. The woman (allegedly) had a history of confrontation with her coworkers. But she was never reprimanded for those; just summarily fired with no warning and the only "evidence" the employer could dig up was this single e-mail. Basically the employer blatantly mishandled the entire situation and was left grasping at straws, trying to use an e-mail as justification.

      In short, she wasn't just fired for the caps in the e-mail; it was simply claimed she was.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    2. Re:There must be more to this story... by TheRon6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd bet there was a more personal confrontation, possibly with a superior, and that email was simply seen as a better excuse to get rid of her than the real reason.

      My thoughts exactly. I don't see this as a story about someone being fired for using caps lock. I see it as a story about a manager who was too stupid to have a legitimate reason to fire her prepared ahead of time and has cost their company $17k as a result. One of my coworkers was fired several months ago because he didn't have one of the certifications that's required of everyone in my department. He'd never had the certification of course but that hadn't stopped my company from hiring him and letting him work there for a year. But he was *really* fired for getting into a very long, personal argument with our supervisor. Clever managers will always have some excuse stashed away to get rid of anyone if needed. Sounds like this manager wasn't nearly clever enough.

      --
      Does this rag smell like chloroform to you?
    3. Re:There must be more to this story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      has cost their company $17k as a result

      actually, they're New Zealand Dollars, so it's only about US$17. (at this point I'd say something about running away, but everyone knows that they don't have the internet in New Zealand, so I can get away with it)

    4. Re:There must be more to this story... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't see this as a story about someone being fired for using caps lock

      Indeed. Even though the use of caps lock merits a summary hanging, it does not merit sacking. ;-)

    5. Re:There must be more to this story... by drseuk · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile the MoD's relieved that its prototype man-eating beaver cyborg has been found in New Zealand and is sending HMS Nottingham to recover it.

      Officers not on snoozewatch have been ordered to "WATCH OUT FOR THAT BLOODY ROCK THIS TIME (PLEASE) EXCLAMATION MARK EXCLAMATION MARK EXCLAMATION MARK" since the RN has yet to upgrade from its ZX81-powered navigation system.

    6. Re:There must be more to this story... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      (This post contains no useful advice of any kind, legal or otherwise...)

      This serves as an excellent example for the typical employee-employer relationship.

      Anyone can be fired from any position. Its true. Every single day employees do things that employers COULD write them up over. Many times a day.

      In this particular case, the manager takes the easy way out and terms the employee for an 'ongoing issue'. But the record doesn't support it, so the employee is entitled to whatever employees get in that jurisdiction.

      By the way, even in an at-will state, this is usually a minimum of unemployment benefits.

      So if you're a boss, remember to walk bad eggs down the death trail. Write them up each and every time they fail to correct the behavior that bothers you. Either they will fix it, hide it better, they will quit, or you'll eventually get applauded for firing them. Do NOT skip directly to the end.

      If you're an employee and you're worried about getting fired, pay attention to the write-ups. Make certain never to commit exactly the same offenses as were documented, and try and get new issues documented separately. Should you be faced with the end of the line before being marched down the process, feel confident that compensation will be due. Otherwise, if they have yet to write you up for anything yet, relax a bit. Freaking out will only embolden the managers to act.

      Oh, what an interesting game we working folk play...

    7. Re:There must be more to this story... by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Officers not on snoozewatch have been ordered to "WATCH OUT FOR THAT BLOODY ROCK THIS TIME (PLEASE) EXCLAMATION MARK EXCLAMATION MARK EXCLAMATION MARK" since the RN has yet to upgrade from its ZX81-powered navigation system.

      They have parens but not bangs?

      --
      $ make available
    8. Re:There must be more to this story... by quickOnTheUptake · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Didn't rtfa but I can almost guarantee there was more to it than just the email. Especially since it is not uncommon that the reason given for firing someone is little more than a pretext. I wouldn't be surprised if there were other less easily described difficulties in the relationship, and this just happened to be a the one objective thing she did that could be construed as obnoxious, and the employer took it as a chance to move her on.

      --
      Mod points: Guaranteed to remove your sense of humor.
      Side effects may include gullibility and temporary retardation
    9. Re:There must be more to this story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like this manager wasn't nearly clever enough.

      Well, it was in New Zealand. The average NZ manager is a dolt.

      And no, I'm not an Aussie.

    10. Re:There must be more to this story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this a company requirement? Or a professional-association type requirement? Because either way it sounds like, far from having a clever manager, you have a stupid one. If it's just a company requirement and your company knew at the time that they took him on that he didn't have the requisite qualification, they probably can't fire him later for not having it. If, on the other hand, it was some sort of professional requirement and your company should not have had someone doing that job without that qualification, he can probably shop them for it.
      Unless he hasn't figured that out, of course.

    11. Re:There must be more to this story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, even in an at-will state, this is usually a minimum of unemployment benefits.

      New Zealand is not a fucking state, you big fat twat.

    12. Re:There must be more to this story... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      According to the Australian Constitution, it is.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    13. Re:There must be more to this story... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Well, they don't have the internet after getting caught downloading from BitTorrent, anyway.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    14. Re:There must be more to this story... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Also bear in mind that what counts as a ligitimate reason in one country (or even in the case of the USA one state) may not be considered legitimate other places.

      Also at least here in the UK how long you have worked somewhere makes a big difference to how much protection you have.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    15. Re:There must be more to this story... by Chapter80 · · Score: 1

      A lawyer once told me: "You can fire someone for a good reason, or no reason. But not a bad reason."

    16. Re:There must be more to this story... by srobert · · Score: 1

      Also, do one more thing if you're an employee, ORGANIZE. You're never going to win against all-powerful management by sticking your neck out by yourself.

    17. Re:There must be more to this story... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      I worked for a small business owner that swore he'd simply fire everyone if that happened. I always wondered how that would play out...

    18. Re:There must be more to this story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it is. It is a sovereign state.

  11. I Wish... by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

    I wish people could be fired for writing in all caps. That would get rid of a lot of dead wood around here...

  12. the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real problem is that she's sending HTML email.

    1. Re:the real problem by mikael · · Score: 1

      Some early ASCII video terminals (DEC VT102) supported both colour and double height text, not forgetting attributes like blinking, bold and underlined characters.

      The E-mail systems at that time supported some basic control of text colour and size. I don't think anyone ever got fired back them for using bold, red or double height text.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:the real problem by ndege · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about the blink tag? ;) Seems like a firing offence to me.

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
    3. Re:the real problem by trawg · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where are you writing from, 1980?!

      As long as clients are sending correctly formatted multipart emails to allow plain text readers the chance to read as well, HTML email is a good thing.

      I used to be a hater too. But over the last many years of writing many, many long emails and seeing them get ignored, I found I could write long emails and just highlight the importand parts in bold or with colour. That way the low-attention-span people at the other end who couldn't take 5 minutes out of their day to read my carefully justified reasoning about why I wanted to do something in a certain way (...because the alternative was sending them a one line email saying what I wanted to do and then getting forfty thousand follow-up emails about why) could just focus on the bright shiny important bits (such as questions) which I really wanted them to see.

      Sure, I could have just written in dot point form. There's a few reasons I write non-terse emails though - 1) I enjoy writing 2) I like making sure I've covered every possible eventuality and writing them all out helps me 3) I like providing all the information a recipient will (hopefully) need to make a decision.

      I've changed my writing style several times over the years to try and communicate more clearly with people who a) rely on email for their job and b) don't like reading and it's been a pretty painful process. No doubt I still haven't gotten it right, but formatting in HTML email is one thing that I've found that makes it easier for me to tailor emails to a given audience.

    4. Re:the real problem by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The real problem is that she's sending HTML email.

      HTML can add a lot to the expressiveness of your email. This is a good thing, as it improves communication.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    5. Re:the real problem by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I hope I never have to work with you.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you hate HTML email that much, just get a reader that lets you set a preference to only read the plain text version.

      If you're referring to the fact that I write long emails, well, that's just a side effect of the complexity of some of what I do. If you want to work in a job where everything is simple enough to be trivalised in single-line emails, then that's your choice (and one I would envy!).

    7. Re:the real problem by Simon+Donkers · · Score: 1

      You don't need HTML email for that. Just write the parts that need extra focus in all caps and people can quickly skim over your email.

    8. Re:the real problem by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

      Hmmm a blinking font sounds like loads of fun! Bet that would get ya fired, writing every e-mail in all caps and a slowly (2x sec) blinking font.

    9. Re:the real problem by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      No color on the VT102. The standard ANSI attributes you mention, yes. I think you have to get up into the 3xx-4xx series before you get color, and by then you have REGIS graphics too.

      But yeah, nobody got fired for using blinking double-height text as far as I know.

    10. Re:the real problem by trawg · · Score: 1

      hehe!

    11. Re:the real problem by koinu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes. HTML is high priority on my systems! It is always marked read first and ends fastest in my trash folder.

      Perhaps... I should mention... this is all being done automatically by procmail.

    12. Re:the real problem by lgw · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's been my experience that people who whine about HTML email are people who are using ancient email readers that don't support it, and don't want to change tools. The number of luddites in the field of software development amazes me.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:the real problem by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I have a tendency to write really long e-mails, too -- and often for many of the same reasons you mentioned.

      Then, I rewrite them to include only the information I really need to send, and save everyone else the trouble of reading half to 3/4's of a page of information they really won't understand and couldn't care less about, even if they could understand it. And do you know what? I've found that doing so has improved communication with my coworkers immensely.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    14. Re:the real problem by obarel · · Score: 5, Funny

      to be honest I'm actually sick of websites that use html stop they just don't look right on my teleprinter stop less markup and more content is what I say stop

    15. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if people aren't reading your emails it's because they don't WANT to read a bunch of meandering bullshit when they've got 40 thousand things to DO that day. break down your complexity into lists like

      I want to do X, using method Y because

      1. it boosts my ego
      2. it'll make the receptionist in the other office like me.
      3. it'll make you rich
      4. profit???

      HTML formatting is just extra crud that needs expunging. If someone won't read your whole email in simple text form, take a hint: It's NOT simply the formatting. Of course, if you prefer, you could add pink smilies and purple ~~~s for each of the headings. then you could write like your boss's 13yo daughter writes on her fb page.

    16. Re:the real problem by Karellen · · Score: 1

      Why not just write the important points at the top as a sort of executive summary. Use bullet points if you want. Or a small collection of one or two sentence paragraphs. Or just one paragraph with all the important points. Then write out the justification in more detail below.

      Low attention span people don't even have to scroll down to see your important points, which still get covered before they lose interest. Those wishing to read on may do so.

      --
      Why doesn't the gene pool have a life guard?
    17. Re:the real problem by Karellen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The keyword there is *can*. Yes, it *can* add expressiveness to your email. In my experience, most of the time it does not. For about 98% of HTML emails I receive it just adds meaningless noise in the form of horrid fonts, freakishly large or small font sizes, garish colours and completely pointless logo image attachments. (The other 2% of the time it merely adds nothing.) I want to read the text of your email in the font of my choosing, at the size I find comfortable, in colours that don't give me headaches. As for your company logo which you attach to *every* *single* *email* - yeah, that's not at all completely pointless.

      Oh, you could use *bold*, or /italic/, or _underlines_, but my "plain text" email reader will add bold, italic or underline highlights if it sees the preceding markup, which was in popular use at least 5 years before HTML was invented, and about 10 years before the first version of Outlook - the mail client from hell that actively subverted all the tried-and-tested "good practice" conventions for making email actually productive - was ever released and popularised HTML email.

      So, uh, how exactly does HTML email improve communication again? Because I don't see it. I've never felt the desire to bother, and every email I've received where it being in HTML has made a difference, it's been for the worse.

      --
      Why doesn't the gene pool have a life guard?
    18. Re:the real problem by omnichad · · Score: 1

      And it's not like it would be hard to patch those clients to read the text portion of a MIME email. Or maybe they already support that.

      My email client automatically converts bold text into *bold* text for the text-only portion. So you don't lose much of the expressiveness of HTML.

      My only complaint is against marketers (opt-in) who don't actually create a text-only version, and provide only a link to a web site with the HTML version.

    19. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you say 'expressiveness' with a lisp while you were at it? This is like saying windows improves your coding skills because the window decorations are alphablended with the desktop. Extra coloring, fonts, and complex formatting will not make up for a badly written piece. If you want to have clear communication, work on your language skills...and keep it as short as possible. Longer != better.

    20. Re:the real problem by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      You might want to read this.

      Also, the better e-mail clients automatically italicise text between slashes, bolden text between asterisks, and underline text between underscores.

    21. Re:the real problem by lgw · · Score: 1

      You're wrong about that. HTML does add expressiveness to email in the cases you describe. You just wish that it didn't. The idiots are expressing their idiocy full force, and as a geek you think it's a problem with the technology, not the people.

      HTML, like RTF, makes emphasized text, indented blockquotes, and bullet lists easier to read.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    22. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, my problem with HTML email is primarily that 99% of the time when I see it, it's some stupid forwarded email bullshit from one of my technologically-challenged/overly-sentimental relatives. It's like these people have never seen good typography before.

    23. Re:the real problem by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Nah, you got REGIS on the VT200 series, but it was all green, amber or grayscale. One of the things that bugs me is that no VT100 emulator I have seen, and specifically xterms and the like do the double height emulation.

    24. Re:the real problem by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      tl;dr ;)

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    25. Re:the real problem by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      That method might be inappropriate given his audience and work environment. I've been exposed to many different writing cultures. Your suggestion is a natural choice in business and especially marketing, and also to an extent in military writing, but not so much in legal writing where things are necessarily verbose.

      Personally, I say the answer is more clipart. You can never have enough clipart.

    26. Re:the real problem by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I totally agree. How can you get the full impact of what I've written you if your email client isn't capable of displaying 36 pt comic sans in lavender?

      Kidding. As I remember, I was using PINE as my client when people around me started writing HTML format emails. I don't remember now having been able to read those messages; thus your luddite argument. But even after I was able to read HTML emails, I got sick of email forwards full of photos, animated gifs, and even embedded audio. And so I regarded HTML email as generally being obnoxious. And then came the warnings about executable code being embedded in HTML emails. However, looking back, I don't think I ever got a malicious email that didn't depend 100% social engineering to be effective.

    27. Re:the real problem by coryking · · Score: 1

      The number of luddites in the field of software development amazes me.

      And the worst part is there are segments of the culture that actively embrace being a luddite and are proud of it. You'll find these people still arguing that images shouldn't be used on a website, or disable javascript out of principle, or bitch about how a program is a 50mb download, or a number of things.

      It really, really is amazing. Here I thought most nerds were gadget geeks who bought a new cell phone every week to stay on top of the latest trends and I come to Slashdot and read people bitching about color monitors or how Firefox is evil for no longer supporting their "perfectly good 486" something. What a weird industry we work in.

    28. Re:the real problem by k8to · · Score: 1

      As long as clients are sending correctly formatted multipart emails to allow plain text readers the chance to read as well, HTML email is a good thing.

      Sorry that mail client was cancelled.

      --
      -josh
    29. Re:the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And probably top-posting, too!

    30. Re:the real problem by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 1

      It's been my experience that people who whine about HTML email are people who are using ancient email readers that don't support it, and don't want to change tools. The number of luddites in the field of software development amazes me.

      This Luddite doesn't want to waste cell phone battery power by having to load the browser component when reading e-mails.

    31. Re:the real problem by trawg · · Score: 1

      That is actually now exactly what I do :) I've found it is the best compromise.

      Exec summary at the top in point form, details below. I use HTML formatting in both the summary and the lengthy text though to highlight key issues in both.

    32. Re:the real problem by trawg · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting article. I'll respond to this first though:

      Also, the better e-mail clients automatically italicise text between slashes, bolden text between asterisks, and underline text between underscores.

      This isn't a standard though. I would totally be happy doing this if it was a standard. HTML is a good, simple, clean standard for text formatting and its now so widely accepted that not supporting it seems like a bit of a waste. It's better, IMO, to focus on "down-rendering" HTML into plain text!

      To your article though:

      - several points are about bad HTML handling. This is a problem, but it's a client problem and one that I think is largely resolved in most clients. Except text-based ones. Oh, and that piece of shit Outlook (now that's a big problem).

      - sending HTML is inefficient due to overhead I would say is a triviality. This is really only a big deal if you're sending emails to hundreds of thousands of people. There is a size penalty, but its orders of magnitudes less than almost any other activity one might do on the Internet. And adding basic HTML formatting (especially if your client creates nice, clean HTML or you write the HTML yourself like I generally do!) really isn't that big a deal.

      - Background image, flashy graphics, etc - subjective and not very interesting.

      - People limited to text only terminals - definitely a problem, but again, creating a simple plain text version to send is fairly trivial.

      - Security issues of inline graphics - definitely an excellent point. Most clients deal with this gracefully already, giving you the option to load or not load, and its trivial to add trusted senders or block losers.

      - Proprietary attachments and mail systems are, of course, stupid. No argument there.

    33. Re:the real problem by jonaskoelker · · Score: 0, Flamebait


        dit dit daw
        dit dit dit
        dit

        daw dit
        dit
        daw
        daw dit daw dit
        dit daw
        daw

        dit dit dit daw dit daw

      That's "use netcat"; credits go to morse(6).

    34. Re:the real problem by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I like the way if you're talking about something technical you can interleave say screenshots of oscilloscopes in with the text. So you can say

      Executive summary - we have a fix.

      With the old version we see this

      Picture1

      [Explain why picture 1 is bad in words]

      With the new version we see this

      Picture2

      [Explain what has changed in picture 2 in words]

      Actually the screenshots from a scope tend to be quite small as a gif or png.

      If you get it right the plain text version is still completely comprehensible for people that read the text only version on their phones. Plus people that understand can see quickly from the pictures what is going on without having to read the explanation. And manager types can just give up after the executive summary. Last but not least sometimes you need to convince a skeptical customer that you really understand and then you can reuse the text and pictures.

      Now without the image you'd end up with a mass of text that is much harder to read.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    35. Re:the real problem by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I have found that holding people accountable for the emails I send them has gotten them to read my emails.

      Considering the size html emails are, I wouldn't mind seeing them go away.
      When you are talking about 10s of thousand emails a day, it adds up.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    36. Re:the real problem by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      Right, that's what I said. Zeyphr passport's FAQ says they do the double height thing clean, but I haven't used it myself.

    37. Re:the real problem by Geminii · · Score: 1

      Over the last many years of writing many, many long emails and seeing them get ignored, I found I could instead send them to people who weren't incompetent.

      It really helps!

  13. Somebody PLEASE by alexborges · · Score: 1

    Give that PHB his propper dose of prozac...

    I mean damn, talk about sleeping with the enemy.

    --
    NO SIG
  14. Ironic dismissal letter, though. by MiniMike · · Score: 1
    A little digging found a copy of her dismissal letter:

    ---

    Uz F1RED!!!11!!!

    LOL!!11!! C YA L8R N0T!!!111!!!

    ---

    She might be better off working elsewhere anyway.

    1. Re:Ironic dismissal letter, though. by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      A little digging found a copy of her dismissal letter:

      ---

      Uz F1RED!!!11!!!

      LOL!!11!! C YA L8R N0T!!!111!!!

      ---

      She might be better off working elsewhere anyway.

      No, she worked in NZ not mainland China.

      --
      $ make available
  15. nap time!? by pwolf · · Score: 1

    I wish I could take a nap in the middle of the day while at work...

  16. It wouldn't be a problem... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If everyone else did their job right and didn't need the bolded and capital letters.

    If anything, everyone else should have been reprimanded and she should have been told not to warn them anymore.

    1. Re:It wouldn't be a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, they could even behave rationally and reprimand only those people who fail to follow the fucking directions! Crazy idea, I know!

    2. Re:It wouldn't be a problem... by Fotograf · · Score: 1

      truth is that lawyers actually type important parts in lowercase small font, grayed out. only lol parts are UPCASE

      --
      God's gift to chicks
  17. Oh. My. God. ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The insanity has even reached New Zealand - there truly is no hope for humanity.

  18. surprised by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Surprised to see this wasn't posted by theodp.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  19. <blink> by DdJ · · Score: 1

    It wasn't blinking, was it? Because if it was blinking, termination is certainly justified.

  20. Ob. bash.org by schon · · Score: 5, Funny

    http://www.bash.org/?835030

    It's funny, 'cuz it's true. :)

    1. Re:Ob. bash.org by religious+freak · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL, I dunno why, but that's pretty funny! Can't stop laughing - I think I've got a case of the Mondays or something!

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    2. Re:Ob. bash.org by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      It's blocked
      Is it that one where:
      guy 1 writes in caps; guy 2 tells guy1 about caps lock key; guy 1 thanks guy one for making writing in caps easier

    3. Re:Ob. bash.org by soliptic · · Score: 1

      yes.

    4. Re:Ob. bash.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know you're a geek when... :)

    5. Re:Ob. bash.org by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I never could figure out why Websense considers bash.org "tasteless"...I so can't say that sentence without laughing.

    6. Re:Ob. bash.org by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

      http://www.bash.org/?79862

      This is just as apt. :-)

    7. Re:Ob. bash.org by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Mondays? Mondays?? Shit, no, man. I believe you'd get your ass kicked sayin' something like that, man. Which reminds me, what's this about you and your TPS reports? Didn't you get the memo?

  21. Uh huh by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After reading the article (which was darn light on the details) I smell a usual workplace suspect: This woman was a much bigger pain in the butt then she was worth. And like many workplace pains she kept her nose JUST clean enough to not be fired for anything serious. Somebody gambled by using a stupid reason and lost. Although I also look at the amount they paid and think $17K is a pittance for the lost time and lost personel who don't want to work with the pain.

    --
    I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    1. Re:Uh huh by RingDev · · Score: 1

      That's how I'm reading this as well. Pain in the ass employee that they just wanted to get rid of. I didn't catch the location, but if it was an at-will employment State, why not just give the usual "your services are no longer required by this organization" line, 2 weeks severance, and send her on her way?

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    2. Re:Uh huh by kenp2002 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If they fire her for wrong doing it won't count towards "Turnover Count" but if they let her go it would impact the turn-over numbers. If they haven't had any turnover for say 5 years then there is incentive to ensure the "good record" goes unblemished.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    3. Re:Uh huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it was in New Zealand, (NZ), not USA.

    4. Re:Uh huh by Sique · · Score: 1

      Because this is New Zealand we are talking about, not the U.S. U.S. law does only apply there if forced by economic or military blackmail.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    5. Re:Uh huh by joyfeather · · Score: 1

      Happened in New Zealand, I believe. I have no idea what the laws are there regarding employment.

    6. Re:Uh huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because New Zealand is not yet a state in the United States of America, dumbarse.

    7. Re:Uh huh by dotgain · · Score: 1
      Basically, after you've worked at a place for three months, you're practically invincible.

      Without three written warnings for the same basic type of offense, dismissal is very shaky ground, and as I said in another post approx. 75% of unfair dismissal cases find in favour of the employee.

      Usual tactic is to bully the fuck out of the employee, make their job a misery, after explaining - in such a way you can easily deny - that it's not going to get better until they hand in their notice.

      I've seen my old boss put two people through that, it was horrible.

    8. Re:Uh huh by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Usual tactic is to bully the fuck out of the employee, make their job a misery, after explaining - in such a way you can easily deny - that it's not going to get better until they hand in their notice.

      I've seen my old boss put two people through that, it was horrible.

      He's lucky he didn't get in shit for it - that's illegal too.

      And for the second time:
      a) the statistics for employment tribunal cases aren't public (or even known to people working for the Department) so unless you're a Member of Parliament, you're making that figure up,
      b) the 90 day rule only applies to small employers
      c) you're not invincible at all - employers go to every effort to make sure employees stay ignorant of their rights

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    9. Re:Uh huh by dotgain · · Score: 1
      1. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/wellington/news/article.cfm?l_id=325&objectid=10547527
      2. Specifically, fewer than 20 employees. According to teu.co.nz, "potentially a third" of the workforce will be affected by the law.
      3. Don't blame your employer - you weren't even able to find the unfair dismissal lawsuit stats.
    10. Re:Uh huh by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

      And like many workplace pains she kept her nose JUST clean enough to not be fired for anything serious.

      I would go one step further - workplace pains are almost always right, the problem is that they go about being right in a domineering, confrontational manner, that can't be dealt with. They might email "EVERYONE must be at this meeting ON TIME - NO EXCUSES". How does one deal with that? Not turn up on time? Complain about the tone of the email? Or just wince, and turn up on time. I've seen it several times in the workplace, and it drives people, including the boss, to distraction, and seriously undermines moral, but is very difficult to handle. If the boss confronts him/her, they'll just acquiesce to the immediate issue (eg. no caps in emails), after making an unpleasant scene, then find another way to be right, offensively.

      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
    11. Re:Uh huh by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Yes, because I trust figured from the EMA. Their sole goal is to annihilate workers rights and return us to a caste system, and I don't believe a word from them - just as much as I wouldn't believe similar figures from the EPMU or ASMP.

      Also, the only way I can see that they could get them is from their members anyway - which don't represent all of the employers in the country. (And even if the figures did come from the authority, it's based on a very small sample anyway - so 75% even if it were the figure, which it is not since the figure in the article is 63%, represents maybe 300 out of 400 cases. Woohoo? More people got fired than 400 in the whole country, dipshit)

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  22. Her Fault by cdoggyd · · Score: 1

    Maybe she won't 'yell' at her boss next time.

  23. not the whole story by DaveGod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From TFA:

    She had also acted provocatively in seeking to view complaints laid against her by colleagues.

    That little line tells us there's far more to this story than using caps in an email, but they just drop it in and try to pretend it isn't there, like an embarrassing little fart that stinks up the story they want to write.

    I know we enjoy complaining about bad journalism but it's no better to promote their shitty little articles.

    1. Re:not the whole story by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's what I was thinking: Crazy person uses what little power her position has to make life miserable for coworkers. Coworkers complain. Boss decides crazy person is disrupting business.

      I doubt anything she did was over the top enough to make a clear cut firing case, but nasty people with a little power doing many small, annoying things can make for a bad working environment.

    2. Re:not the whole story by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking: Crazy person uses what little power her position has to make life miserable for coworkers. Coworkers complain. Boss decides crazy person is disrupting business.

      Agreed, but simple justice suggests that if a complaint is made, the object of the complaint should always be allowed to see the substance of it. Right of reply and all that.

    3. Re:not the whole story by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      So what exactly is so hard about simply documenting what a PITA this person is, with multiple examples and testimonies from other employees, and then using THAT as justification for dismissal, instead of making up some BS reason like this all-caps email?

    4. Re:not the whole story by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what exactly is so hard about simply documenting what a PITA this person is, with multiple examples and testimonies from other employees, and then using THAT as justification for dismissal, instead of making up some BS reason like this all-caps email?

      Because in a lot of these cases the crazy person is not so much crazy as frustrated with idiotic co-workers who can't follow simple instructions. Pretty hard to build a case against an employee when all they do is point out inconvenient truths, no matter how annoying the fashion which they do it in, especially if the PHB is (in)directly responsible for those truths being there in the first place.

      Judging from the whole story, it sounds like this particular accountant is "not a teamplayer".

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    5. Re:not the whole story by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You seem to be talking about a case where there really wasn't a good reason to fire an employee, other than the fact that management simply didn't like him/her for stupid reasons, so they came up with a BS excuse.

      The other poster(s) was talking about a case where there really was a good reason (the employee was a PITA in general, was on a power trip, hurt morale, etc.), but for some reason management couldn't use those reasons, and came up with a lame excuse.

      Obviously, with this particular story, we don't know the whole truth, so we can't tell whether management really had some other good reason to fire this woman, or if they just didn't like her because she pointed out inconvenient truths as you say.

      So my question is really directed to the other poster(s): if there really are good reasons to fire someone, what's so hard about documenting those?

    6. Re:not the whole story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA:

      She had also acted provocatively in seeking to view complaints laid against her by colleagues.

      That little line tells us there's far more to this story than using caps in an email, but they just drop it in and try to pretend it isn't there, like an embarrassing little fart that stinks up the story they want to write.

      Good journalism gives the readers the facts and lets them work things out for themselves (just like you managed to do because you're soooo perceptive). It doesn't spout unfounded speculations to sensationalize a story. I see nothing wrong with this news article. More facts may be revealed in time. Perhaps you were looking for an opinion piece?

    7. Re:not the whole story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA:

      She had also acted provocatively in seeking to view complaints laid against her by colleagues.

      That little line tells us there's far more to this story than using caps in an email,

      Frankly, that little line says nothing.

      I was once told by my manager during an annual review that there were complaints about me not finishing projects. I had no idea how someone got that impression, so I asked who complained about what project. He wouldn't tell me and told me to ask all people in the department to find out.

      Which I did. Turned out the whole thing was as I suspected a misscommunication as usual - someone did tell him I didn't finish one (not several) projects, but all the while that person was not knowing the project in question was actually put on hold by our very own departmental manager.

      In the end then, my manager (who couldn't be arsed to clean any of that up) was pissed that I actually spoke to my colleagues to find out what the complaint was about.

      In my view, they just had to find something bad to say for the annual review so they could fill that "areas of improvement" box and justify not giving a payrise.

      In my ex-managers world view, he'd probably say I "acted provocatively in seeking to view complaints laid against me by colleagues."

    8. Re:not the whole story by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There are better ways to handle this, it's not like she was the first person ever that this applied to.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  24. naptime?? by corbettw · · Score: 1

    Was this an office or a preschool?

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    1. Re:naptime?? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      she should have to sit in the corner in the timeout chair.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:naptime?? by flynt · · Score: 1

      That was a "joke" I think. TFA does not mention naps...very lame attempt at being witty.

    3. Re:naptime?? by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Was this an office or a preschool?

      How do you tell the difference? Both places are known to have brightly colored motivational posters, people acting like 3-year-olds, and people who can't count.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:naptime?? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Was this an office or a preschool?

      New Zealand.

      Here, most people wander around as if they have just woken up...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  25. Sometimes you learn to live with it. by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work IT at a home nursing business, and I get work tickets submitted all the time. The nurses and office coordinators use software that -- don't ask me why -- requires them to use all capital letters when entering patient visit notes and ordering medications. They leave the CAPS LOCK key on all the time as part of their professional work, and are so used to it that it doesn't stand out when they use it in other contexts.

    You learn to live with it.

    1. Re:Sometimes you learn to live with it. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You learn to live with it.

      That's not entirely true. I started out in programming (in Assembler, Fortran and COBOL) when EVERYTHING WAS IN UPPER CASE on the mainframe computers I was using. There was no lower-case option on my punch-cards, and the same goes for my printers. (Though some of them were the fastest printers I have ever worked with, even to this day.)

      But I never liked uppercase, and was happy as a pig in shit when I got to play around with C.

    2. Re:Sometimes you learn to live with it. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Proper software design 101.
      If a data field requires data in all upper case then in your data verification you convert it to all upper case.
      The only excuse is if the software predates the requirement.
      Or if for some unlikely reason it is an COTS product but the program you describe hardly ever is.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Sometimes you learn to live with it. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      They leave the CAPS LOCK key on all the time as part of their professional work, and are so used to it that it doesn't stand out when they use it in other contexts. You learn to live with it.

      Indeed. Look closely at comic book text. All Caps.

    4. Re:Sometimes you learn to live with it. by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      Or if for some unlikely reason it is an COTS product but the program you describe hardly ever is.

      You've clearly never seen the crap that passes for healthcare software here. There's three vendors, and they're all terrible.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    5. Re:Sometimes you learn to live with it. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually I work for a software company that produces software for the legal system. We have had a way to mark fields as all caps for 15 plus years. As well as ways to print output as all caps while mataining mixed case in the document and what really drives me nuts is a way to force mixed case in an all caps document for names like McSomething or MacSomebody! That one made my head hurt for a long time...
      We have about 6 competitors and they are all hyper competitive.
       

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Sometimes you learn to live with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Have you ever seen a comic book that was lettered in lower case? It's practically a revolutionary act, that. And it looks *really weird.*

  26. Her boss wanted her gone by WiiVault · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whenever you hear about somebody getting fired for something silly like this it should be pretty clear that the person doing the firing was just waiting for an excuse. Obviously he picked a bad "reason" to fire her.

    1. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by BeanThere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know why she doesn't just go find another job, instead of this silly lawsuit ... oh wait, greed, that's it ... a $17,000 award, nice. Guess who coughs up for that ... people like us who don't abuse the system :/

      "I am a single woman with a mortgage, and I had to re-mortgage my home and borrow money from my sister to make it through," she said. "They nearly ruined my life."

      Oh please, it's her employer's fault that she has zero savings, yet still bought a house that she couldn't afford without living literally having to live paycheck to paycheck? That makes the employer "responsible" for owing her a living?

    2. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by pete6677 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Since you obviously have not heard, there is a global economic depression going on at the moment. It makes new jobs slow to come by. Consider yourself lucky that you don't have first hand knowledge of this.

    3. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      The employer is responsible for treating employees like human beings. Firing someone over something like this without even talking to her about it first is a stupid, evil thing to do, and $17,000 is a tiny, tiny penalty for such an offense.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Have you ever actually been fired and had to go job hunting again? It is a potentially life-changing event. I'm not saying her lawsuit isn't silly, but to imply that getting fired out of the blue for no reason is no big deal is flat out wrong.

    5. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by selven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "They nearly ruined my life."

      Wait, so the company paid this person a salary and allowed her to own a home in the first place, but when the company stopped helping her it's "ruining her life"? That is some screwed up entitlement mentality.

    6. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by tkg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You aparently didn't read the article.

      "As part of her compensation, Walker was awarded nearly $6000 in lost wages for the 13 weeks between leaving ProCare and finding a new job, but she says she didn't find fulltime work until October 2008."

      Clearly she DID look for another job, and if you think fighting for fair treatment by an employer is abusing the system, then you must be one of those employers.

      I don't know what the legal system is like in NZ, but if it's anything like in the US, the vast majority of the settlement went to the lawyers, making the whole suit primarily a matter of principle.

    7. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by Avalain · · Score: 1

      She did go find another job. It took her 10 months. There are very very few people who have enough of a savings to last 10 months without any sort of income (ok, I'm not sure about NZ, but I know here in Canada we don't get EI if we've been fired). How many years does someone have to live without an income before you would NOT consider it paycheque to paycheque? 2 years? 5 years?

      Plus, it's not her lack of savings that makes her employer "responsible" for owing her a living. It's a basic case of wrongful dismissal. You have certain rights as an employee such as requiring a written reprimand from a previous incident.

      On top of that, what do you mean "People like you" are the ones paying for this? Are you a shareholder of the company that was sued?

    8. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Likewise, if the employer wanted a shot of winning in court, they should have had a clear policy and issued warnings based on the policy. Other companies have to do it, so what makes them so special?

      Why should I have sympathy for your choosing to work at a company that treats employees that way. Especially when you demonstrate that you have no sympathy for someone who couldn't pay for their house?

      Because they fired her for virtually no reason, it counts as damage. The sob story, if it counted for anything at all, would have been used to assess just how much damage.

      Isn't it nice when everybody takes responsibility for their own actions?

    9. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by mcgrew · · Score: 0

      If you work full time for me I owe you a living.

    10. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      But when the company illegally fires her for no reason and with no warning she has a right to complain.

      You have some screwed up employer yay! mentatlity.

    11. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please, it's her employer's fault that she has zero savings, yet still bought a house that she couldn't afford without living literally having to live paycheck to paycheck? That makes the employer "responsible" for owing her a living?

      No, but in NZ the average annual wage is a pittance (around NZ$30k). The majority of people have zero savings.

    12. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know what the legal system is like in NZ, but if it's anything like in the US, the vast majority of the settlement went to the lawyers, making the whole suit primarily a matter of principle.

      Most of the world is a little different. Usually the system is loser pays. So the plaintiff can get damages and get the guilty party to pay for the fact that she had to sue them

    13. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      Firstly, the global economy is not in "depression". Secondly, the New Zealand economy's unemployment rate is still a very healthy 6% - lower than the US's unemployment rate BEFORE the recession hit. Thirdly, the state of the economy has no bearing on whether or not somebody should be forced against their will to give you their money each month if they don't want to (the recession hurts employers too). Fourth, the state of the economy has no bearing on whether or not individuals should save at least enough money that they're not literally living hand to mouth (and thus not make overly large house purchases that prevent this from being possible). Fifth, in case you hadn't picked up on that point, people living paycheck to paycheck and buying houses they couldn't really afford are a large part of what caused the economic mess in the first place. Finally, I presume that since you have time and money to sit and browse slashdot, I presume it hasn't hurt you all that hard either.

    14. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      Where did I say it's no big deal? All I said was that people should PLAN for the possibility that it could happen, so that they don't go through the trauma she claimed she had to.

      Are you genuinely saying that salary earners should not plan accordingly for the possibility that they might lose their job at short notice?

      I'm sorry, I have never *expected* that I "will" have a job next month, I was just not raised that way, nor is it sensible.

    15. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      On top of that, what do you mean "People like you" are the ones paying for this? Are you a shareholder of the company that was sued?

      Oh sorry, I forgot, the shareholders can just go use their money-printing machine in the back room.

    16. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      (All shareholders get issued money-printing machines, you know - salary earners aren't allowed them.)

    17. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody fires someone without cause. It is so expensive to fire someone that there was a conscious decision that it was worth firing her to get rid of her, even if it means eating a $17,000 fine. That's far cheaper then dealing with her bitch ass for another 3 months.

    18. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by NateTech · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No one owes you (or me) anything. A job is a job, and if you're fired tomorrow... whining about it apparently gets you $17K NZD in this entitlement-based world where people voted other people in who'd promise such silly laws. Right to complain, sure. Right to be heard or have anyone give a crap, not really. The article sure sounds like she'd made plenty of people miserable prior to the e-mail. Why defend that? We've all had a co-worker who just needed to go away before.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    19. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Salary earners can buy shares and be shareholders, if they're smart with their money and not morons who whine about shareholders. Has the whole world forgotten how to save and invest?

      --
      +++OK ATH
    20. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by drsquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know why she doesn't just go find another job, instead of this silly lawsuit ... oh wait, greed, that's it ... a $17,000 award, nice. Guess who coughs up for that ... people like us who don't abuse the system :/

      No, it's paid by the company that fucked her over. It took its time, but this thread is finally being flooded by Americans (probably libertarians) outraged that the system actually looked after the little guy rather than the corporation.

      Seriously Americans, stop worshipping corporations, they won't return the favour. I don't see how anyone can be against laws that stop companies arbitrarily taking away people's livelihoods. Only in America I suppose...

    21. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      To confirm what 91degrees said, NZ is indeed loser pays. Also, we have a lot of companies which work on a "no win no fee" basis and take either a per hour, or percentage. For a $17,000 payout, she would have paid between $3000 and $6000. She still gets the majority though.

      Besides, ProCare deserves it. You should see their consultation fee (they're a GP chain).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    22. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's paid by the company that fucked her over. It took its time, but this thread is finally being flooded by Americans (probably libertarians) outraged that the system actually looked after the little guy rather than the corporation.

      Seriously Americans, stop worshipping corporations, they won't return the favour. I don't see how anyone can be against laws that stop companies arbitrarily taking away people's livelihoods. Only in America I suppose...

      The thing that really gets me is the outrage from so many US types that another country *dares* to have employment laws that are slightly more favourable to employees than those in the US. In fact, it you are a US citizen who thinks that US style at-will type employment laws are great and good for the economy, you should be *glad* that other countries have not 'seen the light' and will thus be totally unable to compete with the US due to having to pay (actually a very small amount) in compensation for unfair dismisal.

    23. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You have an odd view of America.

      Many of us, most in fact, agree with you.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Nope, in any place with sane employment laws (most places outisde the US, for example) the employer has a duty of care to employees (its called a social contract - don't be afraid of the word "social" there, it doesn;t make it commie) which extends to only firing for cause.

      If you are fired illegially then you are entitled to compensation.

    25. Re:Her boss wanted her gone by NateTech · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about reality, not the law. If laws are in place that make people THINK they're entitled to someone else employing them and firing them "fairly", fine. But she's still fired, and lost far more money than the penalty that was imposed on the employer. In other words... they don't owe her anything now, and she still lost by her own hand, net result. If she were smarter she would have noted her boss was upset with her behavior LONG before he fired her, and toned down her annoying behavior just below his threshold, if she really wanted to keep the job.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  27. OK by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    This PC crap has gone too far!

    Oops, that same twit will try to fire me now!

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    1. Re:OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This PC crap has gone too far!

      Oops, that same twit will try to fire me now!

      What, do Macs not have capslock keys?

    2. Re:OK by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      This PC crap has gone too far!

      New Zealand is like the WORLD FUCKING CAPITAL of political correctness.

      Political correctness *drives* New Zealanders.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  28. The Text of the Message by night_flyer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    YOU ALL SUCK!!!

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:The Text of the Message by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      obviously the person that modded this down was educated in the US public school system as they were not able to put the subject line and the body of the message together to understand the joke... either that or YOU SUCK!

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  29. Re:All caps: an indicator for insufficient educati by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    It is common for government forms and contracts to have paragraphs in caps. It is not a big deal. Until recently your average typewriter or typesetter could not produce bold face type, it is a simple way to add emphasis to the most important section.

    I like to think the most of us here are fine with some reasonable use of capital letters and object to excessive use of capital letters and to the misuse of capital letters TO add EMPHASIS where none IS needed.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  30. Re:ci0m by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me or have the quality of trolls really gone downhill?
    This guy isn't even trying.

  31. IN SOVIET NZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    E-mail UPPERCASE fire YOU !

  32. BILLY MAYS HERE!!! by PhiberOptix · · Score: 3, Funny

    BILLY MAYS HERE!!!
    TOO BAD I'M DEAD, OTHERWISE SHE WOULD BE WELCOME TO WORK WITH ME!

    and here is something just to bypass /. caps filtering. I guess she didn't posted here much either.

    1. Re:BILLY MAYS HERE!!! by hysma · · Score: 1

      It's not that he liked yelling, his scripts were just always written in caps.

    2. Re:BILLY MAYS HERE!!! by springbox · · Score: 1

      Aw. Now I'm sad.

  33. So... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    ... there's an opening?

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  34. Re: by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Indeed. All caps merely justified knocking her around a bit and perhaps a small fine.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  35. Reality slowly creeps in by kenp2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Face it, we are heading back to royalty and peasantry quicker and quicker. Not long and they'll have us back in chains. I knew a former employee of Anderson who was fired after lunch because he had a spot of soup on his tie.

    "At $85 fucking dollars an hour I expect your monkey ass to be fucking spotless, get the fuck out of my office you unkempt shit!"

    That is why I got out of consulting as I was sitting outside the door during this exchange. I once lost a contract from having a 102 fever and couldn't drive to drop off a floppy disk with a script for a novell printer remap even though there was 12 copies of the disk sitting on my desk 2 cubes over from where my boss sat...

    "If you can't get to work when we need you, then we don't fucking need you. You can mail us the pager and badge, your fucking done in this town!"

    We are pesants, get used to it. I still see the same H1B guys in Minneapolis (Now what, 13 year later) who put 38-40 hours on their time sheets but a simple check of the parking ramp's badge log and they are there 2-3 days straight and the workstation log shows 80-90 hours a week working. They don't dare put their real time down or it is "back on the boat" for them (I hear that crap from their managers all the time).

    I've been out of consulting now for about 4 years and you couldn't pay me to go back into it. I'm lucky where I am at but the horrors I see here in the Twin Cities makes me ill on how they treat employees. I saw on gal get fired because "she's too pretty" and another "because she dates too much", another "I don't need some fat shit blocking my view..."

    I've even been told by a few executives "I'm a fucking piece of livestock" on several occasions (twice ironically at the same resturant "The Palimino", Minneapolis in the La Salle tower. Nice place btw.)

    It gets worse every year and you wonder why no one goes into IT anymore. I cannot speak outside of the IT\MIS field but I have found that, given a sourge, most would use it on someone. The USA corporate culture is getting bad, real bad. Madoff and the like are just the tip of the iceberg in bad behavior. You should hear the kind of shit they say while on Lake Minnetonka or up on the White Fish chain by Cross Lake and hear what they really think about "the fucking toothless braindead pesants I have working for me". The greed is getting worse not better... so much for being an enlightened society....

    Sadly it also appears to be 2nd generation types too. The old man was nice and polite, his children on the otherhand... what the hell happened? I'd rather have the old days before the Mafia wen't legit and brought their business methods with them.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by dtolman · · Score: 1

      Half those exec's are probably dead broke, washed away by the market crash at the end of the new gilded age. If they aren't now, they will be in a year or two, when the commercial real estate collapses like the residential one, all the ARM's start resetting, and the stock market bubble pops again.

      We may have new royalty, but the now constant churn means that the Wheel of Life from the dark ages is ever more apt. They won't be up top for long...we all get whats coming to us...eventually.

    2. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sadly it also appears to be 2nd generation types too. The old man was nice and polite, his children on the otherhand... what the hell happened?

      Perhaps you've hit on the root of the problem. Dynastic succession. Untested, unproven people being placed in positions they never earned. Indeed, they feel entitled to them by default.

      To rationalise this, they need a philosophy for why they deserve so much more for so little. They must be in some way inherently more deserving, superior, better than ordinary people. After that, it's rather difficult to treat others with respect.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    3. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Almost makes you want to join an anarcho-syndicalist commune, where you take turns acting as a sort of executive officer for the week.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by shadowofwind · · Score: 1

      My 2 cents: If you can, find a job working at a company that produces something useful. Easier said than done of course, but it moves things in the right direction. If you're in an industry that mainly sucks wealth from other people, most of the other people in it for long will be assholes, by natural selection.

    5. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you've hit on the root of the problem. Dynastic succession. Untested, unproven people being placed in positions they never earned. Indeed, they feel entitled to them by default. To rationalise this, they need a philosophy for why they deserve so much more for so little. They must be in some way inherently more deserving, superior, better than ordinary people. After that, it's rather difficult to treat others with respect.

      Wow. You just described the late Senator from Massachusetts.

      Well done.

    6. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Face it, we are heading back to royalty and peasantry quicker and quicker. Not long and they'll have us back in chains. I knew a former employee of Anderson who was fired after lunch because he had a spot of soup on his tie.

      Who's we? There's a pretty large chunk of the world where this kind of shit simply doesn't fly. Granted, there's downsides to that too, as employees that really are horribly lazy/stupid/imcompetent get to keep their jobs because the PHB can't be bothered to go through all the trouble to get rid of him/her, but still.

      And I'd say Andersen/Accenture is a pretty extreme example, unless they're actually representative for the US way of doing business, in which case I'm going to smile twice as much the next time I see one of your tv bozo's screaming about socialism.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    7. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sadly it also appears to be 2nd generation types too. The old man was nice and polite, his children on the otherhand... what the hell happened?

      Perhaps you've hit on the root of the problem. Dynastic succession. Untested, unproven people being placed in positions they never earned. Indeed, they feel entitled to them by default.

      To rationalise this, they need a philosophy for why they deserve so much more for so little. They must be in some way inherently more deserving, superior, better than ordinary people. After that, it's rather difficult to treat others with respect.

      I'd mod you up if I had points.

      Thankfully, the good thing about dynastic succession is that the successors, not having the experience of having run a struggling company, end up piloting it either into a hole, lining their own pockets, or at best, into a level, zero-growth situation, giving more room for competitors. We benefit from churn. Industries are like soup: they have to be stirred frequently or the scum rises to the top.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    8. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have worked for 4 family owned companies (in three of them I knew the families from outside of the work environment). Based on that I have discovered a pattern that I have talked over with others that have experience with multi-generation family owned companies. Generally, the first generation greatly values the employees because they recognize that the value of the company is the result of the people who work for them. Often, the second generation was partially raised by some of the employees of the company (Dad was busy running the company, but he brought Junior to work and had various employees supervise him), and sees them as family that the owner is responsible to look after. The third generation usually sees the whole company as a bunch of numbers to be added and subtracted to maximize the bottom line.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    9. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've even been told by a few executives "I'm a fucking piece of livestock" on several occasions (twice ironically at the same resturant "The Palimino", Minneapolis in the La Salle tower. Nice place btw.)

      Apparently in all of your highfalutin trips to "The Palomino" you neglected to learn how to spell the name of the restaurant. http://www.palomino.com/maps.php?cook=1&locations=Minneapolis

    10. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by ovu · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, I can't believe the work environments some people put up with. I have never worked in a place like that, and would rather downscale my monetary ambitions and serve coffee than expose my mind to that poison every day. You get the gold star for horror stories, but dude! This life is too short for that. I've got to agree with shadowofwind that this may be the reality in that particular industry, but I'm in s/w engineering in USA in a very big corp. and am treated extremely well, and work with intelligent, ethical people.

    11. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by booyabazooka · · Score: 1

      Face it, we're not - notice that the woman won her case for "unfair" dismissal.

    12. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The USA corporate culture is getting bad, real bad.

      That's why the economy went into the toilet and isn't likely to get any better very soon.

      Employers were like that in the 1920s, too.

    13. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... as a true consultant you can make your own hours... (nobody can tell you when to come and when to leave [you're not their employee]). And if they don't like that, well, tough luck. They can go elsewhere, or they can live with it. I think the trick is "not to need them"---and only work for folks who need you.

    14. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by brusk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Until one executive officer decides it is permanently Tuesday.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    15. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by dotgain · · Score: 1

      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!

    16. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by kionel · · Score: 1

      As a Twin Cities IT guy, I just wanted to point out that everything this poster said is spot on. The dynastic nonsense is absolutely in place here. The only point I wish to make is that, IMHO, it has become much worse. I actually left IT for five years to work as a Tech Writer and Project Manager. Rose-colored glasses (and, honestly, the desire for the old salaries) drove me back. It's been a shock. Along with what the poster wrote, I've been amazed at the utter lack of ethics displayed. System stability is just not as important as hitting a deadline any longer. Given the kind of systems our teams support, it's terrifying. For the record, as soon as I can transition back to leadership and out of the trenches, I will.

      --
      "'My Country Right or Wrong'is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober,'" -- Chesterton
    17. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by QuoteMstr · · Score: 0

      I vowed that if McCain had won, I would leave the US. Now, I'm considering doing it anyway. It feels like the decline is irreversible now.

      Krugman has an excellent column today about how corruption has not only made the rich richer, but has hamstrung our ability to govern at all. We've incapable of reacting in reasonable ways to real problems.

      It's the Decline and Fall all over again. Why couldn't I have been born 50 years ago?

    18. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound right to me. You mention a consultant being fired for having a spot on his tie...really? Let's hear the other side of that story. You mention people not reporting their hours correctly, being afraid of getting fired if the real hour number leaked out.

      The only problem with that is, it's the sign of a loser in every industry on the planet. Under-reporting your hours means 99% of the time that you got hired based on how cheap you are, so it should be no surprise that they got treated that way. They told a lie (or just couldn't estimate well in the first place), and the result is, they are paying for it.

      So I'm thinking: It sounds like you know a bunch of people who aren't very experienced in their industry, and through them, you know a bunch of people who exploit that type of folk. Makes sense to me.

    19. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by NateTech · · Score: 1

      IT has always been overhead. Those who figure out how to have IT either MAKE or SAVE company money survive, just like every other job in the company. The "magic" has worn off.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    20. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Ah, Mr Brusk! I see you've met the Congressman!

      --
      +++OK ATH
    21. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by NateTech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you actually of the belief that Democrats aren't in the Corporate pocketbook too? Wow. How much money (and corruption) does it take to become President these days?

      It's not a small sum. BOTH sides are playing, and always will.

      Which Party just voted to loan billions to George Soros' company to drill off the coast of Brazil for oil? Yeah...

      --
      +++OK ATH
    22. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by c23gooey · · Score: 1

      reminds me of a saying first generation creates the wealth, second generation expands the wealth, third generation spends the wealth.

    23. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Just try to remember when you do get back to a leadership position that you 'should be nice' to other people

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    24. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, the good thing about dynastic succession is that the successors, not having the experience of having run a struggling company, end up piloting it either into a hole, lining their own pockets, or at best, into a level, zero-growth situation, giving more room for competitors. We benefit from churn. Industries are like soup: they have to be stirred frequently or the scum rises to the top.

      I don't think that is a GOOD THING. Because by extension, or government in the US is a dynastic succession from OLD fat cats and lobbyists running for multinational corporations run by 2nd Generation entitled executives. But they can push out the start-up companies by buying them or forcing them out with barriers to entry (I think the real reason that big corps probably pushed Oxley Sarbanes and the like).

      Face it, we are run by a bunch of Economic Royalists, who can't stand entitlements, but don't notice they work for the Lucky Sperm Club entitlement program and consider everyone not on their pay scale a useless eater. Social Darwinists.

      >> I don't think this is really hyperbole. We have every major economic/industrial branch, lobbying the government, while our economy/security/way of life circle the drain.
      Case in point:

      Big Pharma can't help buying adds that say a public option will kill grandma.
      Big Banking can't help but create a thousand Bernie Maddoffs (who was only thrown to the wolves because he ate his own), and extort the government to create the TARP fund and then threaten economic melt down if the FED gets audited.
      Big Military, can't help but increase government money for the weapons industry, without realizing that our economic situation is more of a threat than any bombs pointing at us -- while we can STILL blow up the world many times over, but we have to sell our weapons manufacturing to Middle East princes to be able to afford it.
      Big Energy, gets in the way of alternatives, without addressing that we are on the other end of the curve of oil production -- and human impacts are threatening our life on this planet. Don't worry about global warming -- just look at the Ph level of the oceans. They spend money lying to everyone, that Solar cannot power our entire lives -- and then we have "concerned citizens" worried about the ecological impact of building too many solar panels -- as compared to too many coal fired power plants? We are all down stream of this garbage now.
      Big Security, it's the job of the future; go to prison or guard your neighbor, or frisk your grandma at the airport. With 2 million people in prison and corporate incarceration -- we can't afford NOT to make things illegal. When judges started getting kickbacks for harsher or fabricated juvenile penalties -- we should have known this experiment was over. How many more stories of "Pot is actually good for X and Y" do we need before we decriminalize this and start giving people with problems a much less expensive drug rehab program?

      I think that this thread has really gotten to an important point -- but we need to see that THIS is how decadence and narcissism kill a culture. Our whole leadership system is a Country Club for Sociopaths and they have taken all the profits from underdeveloped countries and now they can only devour us. 15% year over year profits for the Financial Industry must take precedence over keeping people working or healthy after all.

      >> I don't see much way out of this dilemma until things just start failing... sad to say.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
    25. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by kionel · · Score: 1

      "Nice" is too generic a term. I focused on being fair, firm, consistent, and approachable. Made me a well-liked lead. And yeah, I was an idiot for wanting to get back into the trenches. Fortunately, it looks like I have an offer being extended this week to help rectify that error.

      --
      "'My Country Right or Wrong'is like saying 'My mother, drunk or sober,'" -- Chesterton
    26. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. $85/hour is definitely not enough to put up with that kind of language. If you want to insult me in addition to having me work, you'd have to pay at least $200/hour.

      BTW: That's a freelance scale. I'd work and take abuse for 200k/year on salary.

    27. Re:Reality slowly creeps in by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I once worked in a situation where the woman in charge was a monster. She was the stereotypical man-hating lesbian feminist. I am not just saying this for a rise it is an accurate description. If you were a man she made your working life a living hell. If you shared her gender you could do no wrong. I have also worked in situations where the values you espouse above are on display. It seems that it is somewhat rare these days to find a decent, enjoyable position. With the employment market the way it is it is amazing what some people I know are putting up with. This includes a guy who urinates in machine code that currently drives a taxi.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  36. I'm proud. by neo · · Score: 1

    I thought for sure this thread would be full of all caps.

    Either the mods are marking -1 ALL CAPS or everyone is showing remarkable restraint.

    Either way, well done.

    1. Re:I'm proud. by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Try typing a post in all caps - then you'll see why nobody is using them.

      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  37. They need more slashdot by gregthebunny · · Score: 1

    Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    This.

  38. Good. by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 1

    I'm amazed that there are still people out there who don't realize typing in all caps constitutes yelling at the people who are reading it. Should the woman have been fired? No. The boss should have called her into the office and explained why typing in all-caps isn't acceptable.

  39. Bold Blue? by PPNSteve · · Score: 1

    What? BOLD BLUE? Get a rope!

    --
    PPN
  40. Your suggestion is stupid and insane by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you actually bothered to read the other story about the cannon build by a dad?

    Notice anything? As big as it is, there is no way you can fit a laywer in there to fire them. Not unless you chop them into little bit firsts and that would get the gun powder wet and unable to fire.

    No sir, firing lawyers is NOT the solution. Try again, or build a bigger cannon.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Your suggestion is stupid and insane by pm_rat_poison · · Score: 1

      drain their blood to make black pudding and THEN put them in the canon, silly!

    2. Re:Your suggestion is stupid and insane by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      No sir, firing lawyers is NOT the solution. Try again, or build a bigger cannon.

      Absolutely, he should have suggested firing AT the lawyers. Of course, this brings us back to gun control. It is necessary to have very good gun control if one is going to fire at lawyers. If there is inadequate gun control you might miss and that would be a tragedy.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:Your suggestion is stupid and insane by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Not unless you chop them into little bit firsts and that would get the gun powder wet and unable to fire.

      Freeze them and then cut them up with a saw. Then wrap the bits in clingfilm.

      Incidentally, what's with the stupid broken CSS in Idle? Have we all suddenly switched to reading /. on digital watches?

    4. Re:Your suggestion is stupid and insane by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, what's with the stupid broken CSS in Idle? Have we all suddenly switched to reading /. on digital watches?

      You have to use deprecated HTML b/c CSS is too dangerous or something...?

      --
      $ make available
    5. Re:Your suggestion is stupid and insane by vaporland · · Score: 1

      better to drop the cannon onto a lawyer - why, you could take out two or three this way in one fell swoop...

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    6. Re:Your suggestion is stupid and insane by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Load the cannon Strap the lawyer's head to the muzzle of the cannon. Fire. Parts of the lawyer will be fired, and the desired effect should still be achieved.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    7. Re:Your suggestion is stupid and insane by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      They might fit better in the Epson or the HP.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  41. I suspect that this is not really about this email by wonkavader · · Score: 1

    This is about all the other emails she sent and this one was just the last straw.

    And yes, it's a pretty small straw, but we don't know anything else that was loaded on this particular camel.

  42. YEA! by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 1

    SERVES HER RIGHT!!

    (sorry, couldn't resist) ;)

  43. Good for her! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    good for her! finally ...someone that got justice because they got wrongly dismissed for doing something in their mandate just a little different but got the point across. she knew to use caps to make sure everyone would hear them and not have to repeat themselves over and over again.

    ps- I tired using the caps, but /. wouldn't let me, I guess the boss just needed to implement the filter like /. does...!

    1. Re:Good for her! by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Summary of your post: "Yay for the moron who got herself fired!" Great, we're cheering on idiots who can't tell they're annoying the crap out of all their co-workers now?

      --
      +++OK ATH
    2. Re:Good for her! by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Why do you worship corporations and hate people? Are you American by any chance?

    3. Re:Good for her! by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Why do you make up things that have nothing to do with what I said, or this case?

      --
      +++OK ATH
    4. Re:Good for her! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Why do you even think we care what you have to say,
      or are you just posting on /. to scare up some troll points

    5. Re:Good for her! by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Oh, trust me, I'm well aware of the closed-mindedness about a number of topics, from people claiming they're more intelligent than I.

      All I said was that someone who OBVIOUSLY was a pain in the ass to her co-workers, her boss, etc... was probably DUE to be fired. This is pretty clear in the article.

      What's also clear is that the boss strategically handled it the wrong way and had to pay some money in this case.

      But that piddly amount was a lot cheaper than keeping someone on the payroll who wasn't getting along with ANYONE on the job.

      There are probably people cheering her replacement has arrived -- and it is probably someone they can work with -- without being scolded in e-mail about their stupid internal expense forms.

      Priorities. She placed her need to scold people over her need to retain her job. Her boss didn't document OTHER incidents that had happened in such a way that a court of law could admit them into evidence, so he got slapped with a SMALL fine (compared to continuing to pay her salary, hell it didn't even pay for the entire 6 months of time she looked for a job), and moved on.

      The fact that this silly incident was even newsworthy is amazing. Happens all the time.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    6. Re:Good for her! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I actually think you might be talking from experience there, friend.
      It sounds like you should be replacing YOUR accounting assistant, or whatever.
      It shows you have no knowledge of what someone like her goes through, as well,
      as no empathy for being in a position where even though you have no REAL power,
      say like someone in administration, yet you are given the task of rounding up
      these forms, where dumbasses like yourself, probably make their life so
      hard because you can't even read what it says, when filling the form in...or
      even forget it altogether.

      She has to then go see HER boss, who gives her sh*t for not rounding up everybody's
      forms, and then has to sit through another lecture, of "you should do this"
      or "you should have told him that"...

      Trust me, work in accounting for a few months, where you need to get back all the
      expense account info from everyone that has one (even the president...imagine trying
      to tell HIM "hey asshole, it is really THAT hard to fill in a form properly?")
      and be on time, everytime, else everyone complains about YOU, they did not get their
      cheques for their expenses...

      Seriously, it shows you lack any sort of real experience with this sort of thing, except to
      be one of those morons who forgets all the time how to fill in the form properly!!! /Darwin "The best way to predict the future, is to invent it!"

    7. Re:Good for her! by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Bwahah... I love the ASSumptions that come out in Slashdot comments. Been working in "Corporate Procedure-ville, er... America" for more than 20 years. Same shit, different names. Accounting always whines about paperwork, staff always screws up the forms. Bosses get paid no matter if their forms are right or wrong, because someone fixes the form for them. Staff says, "Form is too complex/vague", boss wonders where problem is, since he always gets paid.

      Plus, I've worked with people LIKE this person before, and been annoyed to shit by their incessant nagging at OTHER people.

      If *I* can see that nothing ever changes in the above cycle, why shouldn't the person actually DOING the job, and adjust their attitude accordingly? Sure, send the standard "You're doing it wrong" form letter every three-six months, but making it personal and starting to get pissy with co-workers, doesn't fix it. Hasn't in the last 20 years, that I've seen.

      I know how to fill out forms, and frankly, I enjoy watching with amusement from afar when admins and morons who CAN'T fill out forms can't communicate and people don't get paid. It's the standard corporate circus. "Nothing new to see here, move along!"

      (Honestly, this is a sign the boss made HIRING mistakes. Big ones.)

      I've worked in plenty of positions where I have no "real" power. Sheesh. Who hasn't? It's not my company. Want power, start a company and take the risks yourself, I say.

      So no, I won't be working in Accounting any time soon... I could see from time spent in Internships and "Summer Hire" programs in college how it all worked -- a number of decades ago. And taking a job in Accounting is a surefire way to either a) A very unfufilling life thinking you can teach idiots of all flavors to fill out simple forms along with a "crusader" mentality that will eventually get you fired in tough times (this example), or b) if you're smart, you smile and "get it" and when people want their money, they'll naturally come asking for help filling out the form. You sleep better at night in example b).

      The only positive - Accounting is about the most stable job anyone could EVER ask for, if you're not a jerk or insane, and the company doesn't go under. Anyone who can work as hard as this person to LOSE an Accounting job, really outdid herself, on a personal and emotional level.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    8. Re:Good for her! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      If no one complains about the current way things are done, we never evolve.
      If she did not try, everyone still goes on doing the same thing,
      and just because the bosses DO get their money, does not mean the woman was not
      bitched out by her superior for not having done things the right way...

      With your point of view, this is why men can still set their wives on fire in India just for instilling distrust (usually getting them to think they are cheating), and the women let them...
      they don't stand up for themswelves...they should just accept
      the way things are, and deal with it...I mean come on...how bad can it be really ...they just have to make sure to make their men unhappy...right?

    9. Re:Good for her! by NateTech · · Score: 1

      How do you make that leap from a bad employee, driving everyone nuts, being fired (and rightly so)... to a man setting another human (male or female) on fire on another continent?

      People have always treated each other like crap, all you have to do is take any history lesson to see that. Some of the worst atrocities ever were "in other human's interest". I doubt coddling an employee who's bothering EVERYONE else in their office is "progress". Call me skeptical.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    10. Re:Good for her! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      >How do you make that leap from a bad employee, driving everyone nuts, being fired...
      In case you forgot your own previous post...
      >If *I* can see that nothing ever changes in the above cycle, why shouldn't the person actually DOING >the job, and adjust their attitude accordingly?
      If you live in a situation where you dont agree with what's going on,
      your attitude is to accept it, because you won't be able to change it!
      That is what message I got from your post.

      If that were true, blacks would still be going to eat in separate restaurants,
      woman would not be able to vote, and oh yeah...
      cave man neanderthals like myself would still be able to just walk over and
      take whatever I wanted from little geeks like you.
      As for being a bad employee, they were branded this way by who exactly, YOU?
      All the article states is that this person was trying to make everyone
      aware of what needed to be done, and did it in a supposed obnoxious way,
      I did not read anywhere in there about disrupting other employees,
      or even being a nuisance other then your assumptions in this post.

      So again, I hope she wins her case, as you can not fire an employee without having proper
      documentation stating with proof the person was either incompetent, or
      was not healthy for the work place and actually compromised the efficiency of the team.
      Also reading an email in caps would not alter my day, and if it did, I would
      have to say, it's time to change jobs!

    11. Re:Good for her! by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Hahaha... so you didn't read TFA (she already won her case - hell that was in the HEADLINE) and you're arguing that I'm making assumptions about the article.

      Slashdot commenters are apparently retarded. I'm outta here. I know better than to be dragged into this stupidity.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    12. Re:Good for her! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I skimmed it, and did not catch on whether or not she won,
      however, life is too short to worry crap like this.
      I thought she had a good point, you didn't ...so who cares???
      Next time you ask someone to explain their point of view,
      at least respect that we don't all come from the same place.

      ps- Do you own your own company, or work in management...i think you do!

    13. Re:Good for her! by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Nope. Thanks for playing.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    14. Re:Good for her! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      thank you, come again

  44. Appropriate Advertising by karlwilson · · Score: 1

    After reading the story, I scrolled down to see a picture of an old man face-palming.

  45. Definitive analysis by JDS13 · · Score: 1
  46. There's a lot more to it than capital letters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Read the article.

    Apparently she was an abrasive and abusive workplace bully. Even worse, she was the gutless sort of person who would not bully you to your face, she used email and emphasized her points in red bold capital letters. We have all been guilty of email-venting, but it sounds like she consistently took it to the next level.

    Everyone has worked with someone like this and I congratulate the employer for having the balls to kick a subversive element from the workplace making it a better place for the rest of their workers.

  47. tell them what you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    tell em what you think.
    geoff.smith@procare.co.nz

  48. Re:I suspect that this is not really about this em by dotgain · · Score: 1
    Well, if this email and it's offensive caps was the best her employer could do in citing a reason, I'd wager they didn't have jack shit on her in terms of specific misconduct.

    So she didn't get on with her co-workers all that well - so what? In my experience the black sheep are often the best workers - especially if their position might cause other staff to 'butter up' the person for some kind of favour (exemption from email/web blocking policy, for example).

  49. Maybe she just took an upper that morning by brusk · · Score: 4, Funny

    And that's why everyone is on her case. It's not as though she was doing anything shifty. If I were her boss, I'd just sent her a letter, explaining how some minuscule changes could fix things. Instead of firing her, he should have put on some Dvorak and calmed down, or at least sent a page up to ask the board of the company. In the future, the key thing the firm could do is find an appropriate space and pick up the tab for a function that would teach alternate methods for controlling oneself; I'm sure that would bring significant returns. But them's the breaks, I guess.

    --
    .sig withheld by request
    1. Re:Maybe she just took an upper that morning by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      he should have put on some Dvorak and calmed down I don' t know about you, but being exposed to Dvorak usually makes me much more upset!

      Oh wait, you mean Dvorák... uh... never mind!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Maybe she just took an upper that morning by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Her ex-boss probably thinks $17K NSD was CHEAP to get rid of her. Seriously.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  50. Pulp Fiction moment by dkh2 · · Score: 1

    We're gonna have to go statutory on your ass.

    --
    My office has been taken over by iPod people.
  51. is it all over yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    people who believe in the apocalypse and end of world scenarios have it wrong. They look at war and fighting and annihilation and death camps and all of that and say this is why god is coming to put an end to things. but that shit has been going on for centuries and it hasn't made a difference. when i say the end of the world is near, its the above article that i would point at as the whole reason this god finally got up off his ass and did something. when you have stupid compounding stupid further compounding stupid in the form of legal framework with lawyers and government all about the formatting of some fucking email, yeah thats what will be the final trigger.

  52. Easy Fix by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

    most techies in that age group have gotten to where they glaze over the fully capitalized text

    Just CAPSLOCK the stuff that doesn't matter and leave what needs to be read in proper format.

    - Microsoft Bug Fix Team

    --
    I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  53. BSD DISCLAIMER by cpghost · · Score: 1
    BSD's standard disclaimer is in all caps too.

    Filter error: don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    Well, couldn't paste it here, but you know what's in it.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  54. All Caps by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    I read a while back that it is actually harder to read all caps.
    That explains to me why EULAs are in them. "They" want me to skim over them and agree - which we all do anyway...

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  55. meh by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Even in the article she sounds really confrontational. I bet the email was just the last straw rather than the first offence.

  56. IN NEW ZEALAND THEY GET NAPS?!! by mencomenco · · Score: 1

    WITH PILLOWS?

  57. Get a grip by syousef · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know why she doesn't just go find another job, instead of this silly lawsuit ... oh wait, greed, that's it ... a $17,000 award, nice. Guess who coughs up for that ... people like us who don't abuse the system :/

    How did she abuse the system exactly? She didn't walk up to her boss and ask to be fired.

    Oh please, it's her employer's fault that she has zero savings, yet still bought a house that she couldn't afford without living literally having to live paycheck to paycheck? That makes the employer "responsible" for owing her a living?

    The laws are there to prevent people turning to crime because they've just lost their subsistence wage jobs and need to feed their family. An employer is in a position of power over his employees.

    People aren't disposable. There is a reason we developed a civilisation where it's not dog eat dog. You enjoy the fruits of that civilisation but don't want it to protect others and call their using that protection "greed". Get a grip.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Get a grip by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      It's been suggested that this was a "last straw" situation. The article doesn't state whether the woman was a problematic employee. ProCare, her employer had no comment other than she caused disharmony in the workplace. Walker's own attorneys acknowledges that she did cause disharmony, but not to an extent meriting termination. It seems really silly that she would get sacked outright for this one incident. It seems more likely that, for whatever reason, Walker just wasn't liked there, and ProCare fired her based on a more long-term opinion of her. Pretty weak though.

    2. Re:Get a grip by syousef · · Score: 1

      It's been suggested that this was a "last straw" situation....Pretty weak though.

      It is entirely the responsibility of the employer to issue formal warnings where the law requires rather than just suddenly snap. So yep pretty weak. You are suppose to give an employee the opportunity to adjust their behaviour before firing them for behaving badly (except in extreme cases like assaulting others, stealing from the company etc. That too is fair enough). Personally I think this is a good thing. It gives the employer pause and it lets the employee know what will and won't be tolerated so that they can either correct their behaviour or start making alternative arrangements.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:Get a grip by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about some NZ employment law? That does sound nice. Had this happened in the US where the employment-at-will doctrine holds, the employer would have been perfectly in its rights to fire her, providing the reason didn't have to do with her being a member of a protected class.

    4. Re:Get a grip by Loomismeister · · Score: 1

      The government isn't there to let people survive without earning a living in society either. It's not as simple as: we have to give people money so they avoid becoming criminals. Also, for the higher class citizens, it really is very competitive. Many times, civilized people do things to benefit themselves in very selfish ways. You say, "You enjoy the fruits of that civilization but don't want it to protect others and call their using that protection "greed".", which is very misleading. It's not the safety net that strong citizens enjoy the fruits of, it's the free market system and greed that drives them to succeed. You can be completely poor and still not be mortgaging your house twice and borrowing money from relatives.

  58. Re:All Caps by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

    > "They" want me to skim over them and agree -
    > which we all do anyway..

    I don't know about you, but I've NEVER agreed to a
    EULA.. I just click OK and move on... Clicking OK does NOT indicate agreement on my part....

    --
    THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  59. Thats not the story... by tengeta · · Score: 1

    Seriously, is the last line serious? NAPTIME? Get over it and read some CAPS JERKOFFS, because if I got to nap at work I wouldn't be bitching about what the font looks like, I'd be glad to have my job still... and nap at it.

    --
    "They confiscated everything, even the stuff we didn't steal!"
    1. Re:Thats not the story... by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      No, there are no naps.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  60. maybe it had nothing to do with the emails by cpicon92 · · Score: 1

    sometimes people just need an excuse to fire someone, the straw that broke the camel's back so to speak

  61. Where's the proof? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    The company says she was abrasive, but can only present one email which, by its brief description, sounds appropriate and professional...sounds fishy to me. It just sounds like the boss made up some story because they wanted to fire her, possibly for completely unsound reasons, but were trying to lay a paper trail and did a very bad job of it. It's not like you're going to get fellow coworkers coming forward for something like this--if they agree with the employer they're opening up the employer and themselves for libel suits, and if they disagree they'll probably get fired too.

    I once had a coworker who disliked me for unknown reasons get promoted to my boss, and then he tried to get me to quit via things like claiming on my review people found me abrasive (which had never happened in earlier reviews). Since I was basically working an extra shift doing work for other people (in addition to bringing in cookies and other manager's favorite tea) he had a hard time finding people to back up his weird claims, so he just resorted to direct and persistent character assassination to his boss. I got the ax in the next round of layoffs, and am now happily toiling away doing coding I love for more money and reasonable hours with non-crazy people. HA!

  62. I got fired for capitalizing one WORD in an email by toygeek · · Score: 1

    In forwarding a trouble ticket to another department, and being fairly new at a tech company, I made a note for whoever picked up the ticket.

    It read "Can somebody in sales either take this, or show me how to do it? I have NO idea what the customer is asking."

    For this, I got put on 30 days probation (I was only there 4 months at this point). My manager said that the owner reported that I had yelled at other employees over email. 30 days later I was gone after being shuffled around, having my job changed 3 times in one week, and getting effectively written up for being late. "Oh, we didn't tell you your schedule changed? Your schedule changed. Ta da!"

  63. Thats what meetings are for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will now schedule all important meetings at 3pm.
    Sunglasses will be provided.

  64. Anonymous Coward hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok,
    I have been in this woman's shoes, it happens all over America, if you aren't management or higher you aren't worth the paper your checks are written on. It doesn't matter how well you do your job, if the boss doesn't like you, there is always a reason to fire you....
      I'm all for the new Labor act here in the US, it should help prevent this petty crap from happening...I hope some day all of the working class, blue collar, semi professional white collar employees in every country can start getting treated as they should be, who else actually makes the profits? No employees, no customers, it's that simple.

  65. Friend of mine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine got fired for using a smiley face in an email.

  66. If you read this correctly! by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 1

    The email, which advises her team how to fill out staff claim forms, specifies a time and date highlighted in bold red, RED equals Danger and it must be in Bold, However this lady was BOLD ENOUGH to USE CAPS, as some people cannot SEE Colours or BOLD. Just REMEMBER WHEN on Bomb DISPOSAL (EOD) red is NOT the LIVE WIRE or BLACK with a RED SLEEVE. Niether Is Brown/Blue or Green and YELLOW Stripes. Therefore, you now might UNDERSTAND why she used CAPS whilst on SENTRY duty to make WAKE people UP as seeing RED does not trigger an ALARM. I say good on you girl for being SWITCHED on when other's were NOT. no AC/DC jokes please! :)

    --
    All cows eat grass!
  67. Lucky by Guerilla*+Napalm · · Score: 1

    She's lucky - she only got fired. If she used Comic Sans, I would have taken her outside and shot her.

  68. Re:Bothered to read by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Sure you can. Like in that other story.

    "Scientists have figured out how to deliver lawyer toxins to small cases using "nano-lawyers".

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  69. Sad to hear it. by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    and are so used to it that it doesn't stand out when they use it in other contexts.

    I KNOW JUST WHAT YOU MEAN. I USED TO PROGRAM IN FORTRAN AND COBOL WHERE YOU HAD TO TYPE IN ALL UPPER CASE WHICH WAS HARD ON THE EYES BUT I DON'T THINK THOSE LANGUAGES HAVE HAD A LASTING EFFECT ON MY WRITING

    (slashdot insists that I don't use so many uppercase letters because it's like yelling, but I like to say that it's like programming).

  70. Wow. by Timex · · Score: 1

    If using all-caps really bothers them that much, the people at ProCare Health really need to work on getting thicker skin.

    Yeah, upper-case is annoying. It's not the end of the world though. What is their corporate environment like, if using upper-case pushes the management over the edge like that?

    --
    When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
  71. The law disagrees with you by Capsaicin · · Score: 1

    Clicking OK does NOT indicate agreement on my part....

    If you cross your fingers while you sign a contract, does that work too?

    --
    Better to be despised for too anxious apprehensions, than ruined by too confident a security. --Edmund Burke