Slashdot Mirror


Is Working For the Gambling Industry a Black Mark?

An anonymous reader writes 'I'm a recent university graduate and I have been offered a software developer position in a company that supplies software to the gambling and betting industry. At first I was very excited about the opportunity, however, a few of my friends have told me that working for the gambling industry will put a permanent black mark on my career as a software developer. I don't know that many people in the industry with experience in hiring. Google has not helped, and everybody else I ask doesn't know. So I'm asking Slashdot. In your experience is this true? When you hire developers, is the fact that they worked for a gambling company a big turn off? Also, I'm currently in the UK, but would like the freedom of working in US or somewhere else later on in life. So experience from anywhere in the world is welcome.'

467 comments

  1. Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    More of a roll of the dice.

    1. Re:Not a black mark by Z00L00K · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If the company you work for is completely legal it shouldn't cause a big mark. If it's government operated it's as safe as it gets. And probably scores higher than if you have had a work for the IRS (or what it's locally called)

      But if you work for a telemarketing company (Who doesn't love to hate telemarketers) or in the "adult entertainment" industry (the sexual harassment factor) you may have a harder time.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    2. Re:Not a black mark by dasherjan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think that the reason a lot of people consider it a black mark is because of the mob connection to it from the "old" days. For whatever reason people associate the entire gaming industry with organized crime. When some potential employers (granted the older ones mostly) see that you worked for the gaming industry. They wonder if you are really trustworthy. Though I think today the corporations are starting to change that perception some.

    3. Re:Not a black mark by roguetrick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't associate the gambling industry with organized crime, but I consider it predatory. Still, gotta legalize it or it'll just be run by criminals again.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    4. Re:Not a black mark by markov23 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't think there is any black mark - actually when it comes to writing secure code -- this industry is well ahead of other industries. I probably hired 70 developers at my last company and I wouldn't hesitate to hire someone from the gambling industry.

    5. Re:Not a black mark by teknosapien · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yea except the adult entertainment industry is usually at the bleeding edge of tech oh and one more thing they tend to pay Very well with fringe benefits

      --
      no matter how good it is, it is human nature always wants to make things better
    6. Re:Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't consider the gambling industry to be run by criminals, the IRS, well, that's another story.

    7. Re:Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I worked for "the adult industry" - I had never heard the word flaccid or turgid in any company. That was 10 - 12 years ago. Never had a problem.
      If the company is named "naked girl gash" you may have a problem but if it is "corkee enterprises" not a problem.
      We did database stuff, dns, redundant services, ....
      My wife didn't even really give me a hard time ...
      Paid well, guys were funny and I never saw a naked person or any skin.

      After 30 years of working ... it ain't the job or the company ... its the people you work with.

    8. Re:Not a black mark by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may roll those dice, but depending upon your assignment, you may never touch a slot machine again as a customer.

    9. Re:Not a black mark by digitalunity · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would think this depends a lot on what exactly you are doing. If you're writing a DB back-end for a Caribbean island company who specializes in selling what is likely to be illegal gambling services to americans, that might be a black eye for your resume.

      Then again, if you're writing bleeding edge gambling software for video poker machines, that could be a huge positive mark on the resume.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    10. Re:Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing to be careful of is the company poker game!

    11. Re:Not a black mark by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      What you really meant to say is corporate PR=B$ public relation firms are trying to changed the image. Gambling ain't gambling when one side of the equation has the odds wildly tilted in the favour, that's just losing for the mug punter. You end up with a black mark because of that inherent deceit and that deceits inevitable draws corrupt exploitative people to it (people that believe in honesty and integrity will generally avoid that whole industry).

      When you profit by the harm caused by an industry and the gambling industry cause a huge amount of harm to the industry, your greed reflects your personal desire for enrichment regardless of the impact on others, so your reputation is tainted, and in competitive situation where your qualifications and experience equals some else's competing for that same position, you will likely lose at the subconscious decision making level.

      For those that are driven by the greed in support of the gambling industry, either equal the odds and you can gamble along with punters or your just a pack of cheats.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    12. Re:Not a black mark by mockchoi · · Score: 5, Funny

      oh and one more thing they tend to pay Very well with fringe benefits

      I'm simultaneously very curious and very, very scared.

    13. Re:Not a black mark by AugstWest · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm simultaneously very curious and very, very scared. You're on /. and from Wisconsin. That's perfectly normal.

    14. Re:Not a black mark by pla · · Score: 4, Informative

      You may roll those dice, but depending upon your assignment, you may never touch a slot machine again as a customer.

      Having worked in this exact field, let me assure you - After implementing jurisdictional payout tables on a video lottery terminal (poker, slots, pretty much includes anything you'd find in a modern casino), you'll never want to play the slots again.

      At least the old mechanical ones merely favored the house, but "honestly" spun the wheels. Modern machines decide how little you've won and then pick a configuration to match the take.

    15. Re:Not a black mark by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      I don't associate the gambling industry with organized crime, but I consider it predatory. Still, gotta legalize it or it'll just be run by criminals again.

      Or continue to be run by the same criminals, but with their operation legalised. Gambling is pretty tightly government controlled here in Australia, and they do work hard to keep the mob and mob-related people out. The occasional flutter on Melbourne Cup Day however is seen as patriotism by most, not gambling. But the Casinos are neither owned nor operated by the Government, and you know who the investors are going to align with. It's not for nothing the favorite media euphemism for a certain job category is "colourful racing personality".

      If you stay out of the finance end of gambling you might get to keep your kneecaps, no matter who runs it. Just remember, Las Vegas wasn't built by winning gamblers - Las Vegas was built on the backs of losers.

      I don't mind buying the occasional lottery ticket (not often) because I consider it a fun thing to underwrite the sudden wealth of some poor sod somewhere in the country. Luck tax, if you like. But ponies, pokies, roulette & all that? You're just paying someone else's neon bill. Do the math.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    16. Re:Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand why having a sustainable business plan is deceitful. So long as the odds are *known* there is no deceit.

      It's also worth nothing that in many games the house advantage is fairly slim. They still win, but only because of the huge aggregation of thousands of hands/pulls/etc. That's hard "wildly tilted".

      Are you this angry about all forms of entertainment? I mean, the movie theater takes $10 for a ticket, and I have 0% chance of winning that back from them. What if they played movies on the gaming floor -- then would it be okay for them to take my money in exchange for a few hours of entertainment?

    17. Re:Not a black mark by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      I'm with parent. I hire programmers. I wouldn't hesitate to hire somebody who worked for a casino or a (legal) gambling institution.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    18. Re:Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      emphasis on harder

    19. Re:Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is entirely game-able :)

    20. Re:Not a black mark by nsayer · · Score: 1

      So is the PGA a gambling organization?

      Before you answer, compare and contrast how a golf tournament works to how a poker tournament works and tell me how the former is fundamentally different from the latter.

    21. Re:Not a black mark by Kokuyo · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's the company, too. It's the difference between getting things done or getting buried in bureaucracy and stupid management ideas and then being blamed for the failure of said ideas.

      I agree that the colleagues are very important. But you can kill the best team with enough bad management decisions.

      As for 'black marks', I'd wager a professional and legal adult or gambling company will be a pro on your resume. As was said previously, those are usually bleeding edge in technology and/or security aspects. And if the guy doing the interview starts wagging his eyebrows at you, it doesn't bode well for his company's professionalism.

    22. Re:Not a black mark by noundi · · Score: 1

      I don't associate the gambling industry with organized crime, but I consider it predatory. Still, gotta legalize it or it'll just be run by criminals again.

      Or continue to be run by the same criminals, but with their operation legalised. Gambling is pretty tightly government controlled here in Australia, and they do work hard to keep the mob and mob-related people out. The occasional flutter on Melbourne Cup Day however is seen as patriotism by most, not gambling. But the Casinos are neither owned nor operated by the Government, and you know who the investors are going to align with. It's not for nothing the favorite media euphemism for a certain job category is "colourful racing personality".

      If you stay out of the finance end of gambling you might get to keep your kneecaps, no matter who runs it. Just remember, Las Vegas wasn't built by winning gamblers - Las Vegas was built on the backs of losers.

      I don't mind buying the occasional lottery ticket (not often) because I consider it a fun thing to underwrite the sudden wealth of some poor sod somewhere in the country. Luck tax, if you like. But ponies, pokies, roulette & all that? You're just paying someone else's neon bill. Do the math.

      I've been to casinos a few times in my life. A couple of times I came out with more than I started with, but more often I didn't. In my opinion you can only justify entering a casino by having two key criterias along:
       
      1) Expecting to lose.
      2) A sum of already withdrawn cash which you are prepared to lose, you may use your credit card for one purpose, and that would be ordering foods or drinks.
       
      Keep this in mind and you'll have a fun time without getting broke. This has worked for me everytime.

      --
      I am the lawn!
    23. Re:Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's illegal pretty much everywhere. You won't find those machines in Vegas.

    24. Re:Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't mod parent as informative. His statement is a complete lie. I'm not sure about other countries but in Australia "pokies" (video slot machines) do not and CANNOT do automatic configuration changes depending on turnover.

    25. Re:Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that means what you think it means. It will be run by the same people.

    26. Re:Not a black mark by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Working in sin industries may affect your ability to be bondable, or to get security clearance. I've turned down a number of offers for that reason...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    27. Re:Not a black mark by CowboyBob500 · · Score: 1

      So long as the company is legit I say definitely go for it. When I left university I worked for (what was then, don't know now) the largest US focused online gambling company based out of Antigua - as an aside, they were also the first company in the world to take a bet online.

      Not only has that job served be very well in my career - knowing how to write accredited, secure, efficient code - it has also given me a hell of a lot of stories to tell. Good times. I only ended up leaving because it was quite a nomadic existence as I was flying all over the world all the time and there comes to a point where enough is enough and you need to settle down a bit.

    28. Re:Not a black mark by pla · · Score: 1

      That's illegal pretty much everywhere. You won't find those machines in Vegas.

      Um, wrong - Most jurisdictions require that level of control, and yes, that includes Vegas.

      Don't get me wrong - I didn't say the machines "cheat"... They arguably play the fairest games ever in the history of gambling. But "fair" in that you will win and lose exactly as much as dictated by the relevant regulatory bodies.

      What, do you work for the gaming commission and don't want your little secrets getting out for bad PR? Guess what, any NDAs on me expired half a decade ago, so, boo-hoo for you, AC.

    29. Re:Not a black mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in the UK it isn't.. more bodge it and scarper.

    30. Re:Not a black mark by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I can somewhat back this up.

      The regulations on electronic gaming equipment puts fairly strict limitations upon how they can operate, precisely because regulators want a set of proofs about the method of determining the outcome.

      The methodology to go from state to outcome must be as simple as possible.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    31. Re:Not a black mark by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong - I didn't say the machines "cheat"... They arguably play the fairest games ever in the history of gambling.

      So they're like a die that always rolls 3.5?

    32. Re:Not a black mark by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Strange game. The only winning move is not to play.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    33. Re:Not a black mark by sheath · · Score: 1
      That would be an odd result from working in gambling. I had to go through the most strenuous security clearance process in my life (bank records for the past 12 months; tax records for the past 5 years; fingerprinting; an interview) to *get* a job in the gambling industry. Admittedly, it's government-run up here in Canadia (also known as the 51st-60th states), but still.

      I seriously wouldn't worry about security issues.

      --

      ---sheath
    34. Re:Not a black mark by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Then there is that word "should".

      I think the real answer is, it depends on who is doing the hiring. We all like to think we are not biased, but, we all have our biases. It is possible that the person interviewing you has a problem with gambling, could be mormon, could have had a degenerate gambler for a parent etc. They also might hold it against you that you worked in that industry.

      Thats true of anything though. You could work for Monsanto and interview with the cousin of a small farmer who got in legal trouble for seeds that fell off a truck and grew on his land. Shit, you could call in for a phone interview and have it be with that bitch who side swiped your car and blamed you for the accident (happened to someone I know!).

      In the end, I would say.... fuck them all. If its a job that you think might be interesting and you have no problems with it, I say take it. Do you really have such a strong need to be accepted and belong as you can't take not getting some job later on? The chances of getting any individual job that you want are pretty low anyway.

      People really need to turn it around. Yes they might reject you... consider it their loss. Do you want to work for someone who would hold something like that against you?

      Thats my attitude on drug tests. The only fluid sample that anyone other than my doctor gets to ask for is a taste test. I don't want to work for someone who invades into my body chemistry and what I may or may not do on my time off.... so if thats what they need, good luck to them.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    35. Re:Not a black mark by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      I think it depends.

      As others have said, if it's shady like one of those offshore Internet gambling companies or anything not quite legal - yeah it'll be a black mark.

      If it's connected with the big Las Vegas casinos, or other casinos that are fully legal and HEAVILY regulated, you not only should be fine, but knowing the reputation such institutions have for security, it is likely going to be a significant positive.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    36. Re:Not a black mark by rgviza · · Score: 1

      agreed. you'll also end up with advanced knowledge about RNG which is very important for security.
      I'm with parent.

      --
      Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
    37. Re:Not a black mark by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      I think you are correct in your assessment. I don't think either are gambling. Poker is a game of skill, where the skill has components of managing chance and your opponents.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    38. Re:Not a black mark by ameoba · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that after watching some gambling addict drop their entire SSI check into a video lottery machine and walk away empty handed, I actually do have a better chance of getting a big hit if drop $5 in?

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    39. Re:Not a black mark by COMON$ · · Score: 1
      I am in the security industry and from our standpoint we have to look at his history. Now, if I saw he worked in the gambling industry I would spend time asking questions about his involvement and if he has any gambling addictions and what kinds of ties he has. I know it is stereotyping but in my industry stats matter and we have to check any case where someone might have leverage and be a candidate for espionage.

      So if you see that as a black mark then I would say be careful. Any industry that carries with it a stereotype is going to cause issues on a resume, don't think what should happen, think about what people's biases really are and whether or not you can overcome them, or even want to try.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    40. Re:Not a black mark by vtavares · · Score: 1

      Shame your post went over most people's heads...

    41. Re:Not a black mark by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Working in sin industries may affect your ability to be bondable, or to get security clearance. I've turned down a number of offers for that reason.

      As for a U.S. clearance...no. If you don't have a gambling problem, or credit issues, or something that makes you a blackmail target, they won't care.

      As for hiring someone with gaming industry experience is concerned, I wouldn't hesitate (I've probably interviewed 100+ people in the last ten yrs). But, I'll qualify that by admitting that I do a Vegas vacation every year.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    42. Re:Not a black mark by geekoid · · Score: 1

      fringe benefits like Hep, Herpes and HIV?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    43. Re:Not a black mark by Xeleema · · Score: 1

      Indeed, you've piqued my interest. Can I have a group of slashdotters start submitting their experiences geeking it up in the adult entertainment industry, please?

      /me gets the popcorn.

      --
      "When I am king, you will be first against the wall..."
    44. Re:Not a black mark by speculatrix · · Score: 1

      I worked for "the adult industry".... My wife didn't even really give me a hard time

      you mean you didn't bring your work home? didn't even score some free vi@gr@? man, what a wasted opportunity :-)

      meanwhile, this is /., please explain what a wife is!

    45. Re:Not a black mark by alexo · · Score: 1

      Having written and maintained parts of that code, I can attest that at least for some online gambling applications that is definitely not the case.

    46. Re:Not a black mark by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      For whatever reason people associate the entire gaming industry with organized crime.

      Well, it largely is. I mean, they write the laws, and then they exempt themselves so that they can have odds that private casinos would not legally be allowed to have. In may places they outlaw any competition. But its good because its used to fund eductation.

    47. Re:Not a black mark by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I don't associate the gambling industry with organized crime, but I consider it predatory.

      Hm... do you consider the alcohol industry preditory? What about fast food?

    48. Re:Not a black mark by Helmut+Kool · · Score: 1

      Say you play video poker in Vegas. Are the cards not dealt completely randomly? Do the previous cards dealt affect the cards dealt in the next round? Is the game not completely analogous to if somebody dealt you the cards in real life from a well shuffled deck? To my best knowledge that is how video poker machines should work according to the law. And there isn't any need for them to work in any other way because the pay tables make sure that the casino will win on the long run.

    49. Re:Not a black mark by gd23ka · · Score: 1

      Things people worry about it wouldn't even occur to me that people might potentially take offense if I worked for the gaming industry,
      maybe implementing Gaming Standards Association standards (learn how backend systems at the casino talk to slot machines)
        http://www.gamingstandards.com/index.php?page=standards/free_downloads_standards

      People might not agree with gambling per se, but the technology that is behind the operations of a casino is top of the line and kick
      ass.

    50. Re:Not a black mark by nfn · · Score: 1

      "Developed stored procedures for an international banking organization. During this project I used PL/SQL and was exposed to domain knowledge in low latency transaction processing. Familiar with ACH protocols and international wire transfers."

      "Designed, developed and maintained a relational database servicing 3,000 client machines processing 46,000 transactions per day with high throughput and low latency for an entertainment company based out of Nevada."

      If I saw those on your resume, I wouldn't even make the connection to gambling or illegal activity, and even if I did suspect it, who cares?

      "This is going on your PERMANENT RECORD!"

      Just emphasize your technology role and put some positive spin on the industry/sector, if its actually illegal then cite confidentiality agreements that prevent you from disclosing the actual company and flip the conversation back on the role and skill set.

  2. porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    what about adult websites dev/design/building/hosting. gambling on the resume can't be worse then porn.

    1. Re:porn? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depends on the "porn", but lots of people see porn as a legitimate thing between consenting adults who know what they are doing. Gambling, pretty much by definition, has to work with people who don't know what they are doing. That makes it, if not always worse, at least more clearly bad.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    2. Re:porn? by tepples · · Score: 1, Troll

      Gambling, pretty much by definition, has to work with people who don't know what they are doing.

      Are you talking about Vegas gambling or Wall Street gambling?

    3. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gambling, pretty much by definition, has to work with people who don't know what they are doing.

      Not completely true. Personally, I find Las Vegas and its ilk extremely creepy, but I believe you can get extremely close to 50/50 odds with the right strategy in craps. Otherwise, casinos are no less unethical than tobacco companies, and you can take that as you will.

    4. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Gambling, pretty much by definition, has to work with people who don't know what they are doing. That makes it, if not always worse, at least more clearly bad.

      While gambling is generally a tax on people who are bad at math, some people gamble for the entertainment value, and can easily afford to cover their losses.

      I'd be interested to see an analysis of different types of gamblers.

    5. Re:porn? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Gambling, pretty much by definition, has to work with people who don't know what they are doing."
      I'm not entirely sure how you managed to arrive at this conclusion.

      People gambling aren't always idiots that think "Ima go win a million bucks". Often times they are people that do it for recreation or fun knowing full well that they're loosing money. For example, you can gamble at a slot machine for many hours on only $20-$50. Some people have fun watching the wheels spin and lights flash. For them, it's worth the money. Other people enjoy the social aspect of gambling such as in blackjack where the players aren't competing against each other. Or in craps, where the players are all competing against... the shooter... or the house.. unless they roll a 7 and it's the third tuesday of the month.... anyway, there's a lot of people cheering for someone so someone is having fun.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    6. Re:porn? by polemistes · · Score: 1

      There is one and only one way of winning in gamling. Luck.
      Don't laugh. I know lucky people, and I'm not one of them.
      The people I know have gambled a lot their whole life, with quite a profit. Not horse racing or anything where guessing is possible. If you know your math, you'll know that's very very improbalble without luck. Plain luck.

      On topic:
      I wouldn't hire you if I knew you considered taking the job but refrained to do it because you thought it might hurt your chances of getting other jobs. That is a very questionable moral and hypocritical. Please choose what you want to do with your life based on your own moral judgement.

    7. Re:porn? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      For example, you can gamble at a slot machine for many hours on only $20-$50.

      I'm fine with your examples. A good way to get good cheap food is to dress up in a proper tux and go to pretend to gamble. There are lots more examples; but mostly those aren't the people who are making money for the gabling industry. That's basically two groups. The first is "high rollers" who are losing money at a rediculous speed but are sometimes able to afford it. The second is the "idiots" as you called them. The slow gambling people are tolerated, even encouraged, mostly because they give a good atmosphere for getting the money out of the other two groups.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    8. Re:porn? by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      I would be more willing to hire someone that made a choice like that - shows good judgement. Turned down something that helped him in the short run for long term concerns.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    9. Re:porn? by DrLang21 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Don't forget poker, where good statistical knowledge can give you a big advantage.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    10. Re:porn? by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      I don't particularly enjoy slots either, but craps is fun. Horseracing, although I am not into it, is surely fun if you enjoy watching horses. Sports betting, which I have enjoyed on occasion, makes watching sports more fun since you have more of a stake. And if you bet among friends there's no rake bleeding away your possible winnings.

    11. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There is one and only one way of winning in gamling. Luck.

      What you say is true for some forms of gambling such as keno or the lottery, but there are other forms where knowledge of the game and skill actually do play a big part. Blackjack has been beaten badly, and, at least in the past, with methods that no reasonable person (which excludes pit bosses and casino executives) would consider cheating. There's also a reason you often see one or more of a comparatively small set of professionals at the final table of big poker tournaments. These folks are highly skilled and experienced players who know how to do the math. Being able to read people helps too.

      On the hiring topic, I can see where some people would look unfavorably on someone who'd been employed in the gambling industry. Some people would probably look unfavorably on my years spent building defense systems. I don't think either of these groups make up a significant portion of hiring managers in engineering. I suspect most would find a job in the gambling industry to be interesting.

    12. Re:porn? by BrianRoach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Other people enjoy the social aspect of gambling such as in blackjack where the players aren't competing against each other. Or in craps, where the players are all competing against... the shooter... or the house.. unless they roll a 7 and it's the third tuesday of the month...."

      Exactly. Last night was spent with my wife and a friend up at Blackhawk (Casinos outside Denver in the mountains).

      I ended up $175 down for the night playing craps (8pm until about 2am ... ::shrug:: It was fun, and the drinks are free at the tables.

      So ... I spent $175 for about 5+ hours of entertainment. Last time I looked, good seats and parking at a 3 hour long NFL game would cost me more than that, and the beer is $7.

      Some nights ... I actually MAKE money. Of course ... I never bet on that ;)

    13. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.

      How about "-1 still hasn't figured out the difference between lose and loose."

    14. Re:porn? by Asclepius99 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So just because they don't share your same interests they're idiots? Someone could easily say they enjoy watching wheels spin and lights flash so they watch GSN and don't spend an extra $20-$50 on a video game. Some people may just not enjoy video games. So you're not choosing the "better" option, you're just choosing the better option for you.

    15. Re:porn? by donaggie03 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And some people would call you an idiot for spending $20-$50 on a video game, because there are better options out there. Quite simply, there will ALWAYS be a better option, depending on who you are, how you were raised, etc. So everyone can go around calling each other idiots because of their favorite pastime. Seems kinda pointless doesn't it? Just because video games are your form of poison doesn't mean they are for everybody and it certainly doesn't make them a better choice for everyone else.

      --
      Three days from now?? Thats tomorrow!! ~Peter Griffin
    16. Re:porn? by roguetrick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Making choices based on your future career prospects is bad. Making choices based on magic is good! Great advice!

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    17. Re:porn? by roguetrick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just don't buy it, I don't see how it could be fun without the suspension of disbelief. The only way I could see it being fun is dreaming about winning big and fooling yourself into thinking it might happen. Dichotomy of the mind, part of you knows better and part of you wants to suspend disbelief. I can buy the social aspect of it though, no doubt. Congratulating winners can give you part of the rush they feel. Either way, I don't think its because gamblers are any stupider than I am. I just think it might be a common problem in our species.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    18. Re:porn? by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Porn is a hot button topic with many people. You got one side that hates it for religious and reactionary reasons. You got another side that hates it for the objectification of the individuals involved, and how it reflects across the population. You'd hope that someone making hiring decisions would not take stances outside of the ethics of the industry and the norms of the organization, but I doubt that happens.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    19. Re:porn? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Often times they are people that do it for recreation or fun knowing full well that they're loosing money. [...] Some people have fun watching the wheels spin and lights flash. For them, it's worth the money.

      I don't know how you see that, but that fits right into the proper definition of "exceptionally stupid" (assuming "idiot" is someone exceptionally stupid). I think that's how GP understood it too.

      If I want to play cards, I can do it everywhere, with my friends for example. No need to throw away large sums of money in the process.

      But hey, nothing against gambling. In a world where the worst idiots get the most support, it's one of the few things that still stimulate natural selection.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    20. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I spend a few hours at video poker machines with my wife, we'll each spend about $20.

      We aren't slow gamblers, but video poker has pretty thin odds when played reasonably well (even positive by about a percent for some combinations if you can play mechanically - check the Wizard of Odds).

      For that we each get a few drinks, we chat, we play a moderately entertaining game, sometimes we even win, which is nice.

      I'm sure they don't care that much, since they just made $40 off of us for the cost of a little electricity and 5 or 6 stiff drinks.

      Anyway, not much more expensive than watching a movie, and they bring the drinks to you, and you can leave/wander around when you want without missing anything.

      And most casinos now have plenty of floor shows, restaurants and other entertainment.

    21. Re:porn? by glittalogik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Craps is the only game I've ever played, at Star City in Sydney. I went into the casino flat broke one night with my housemates and scored two non-exchangeable $10 betting vouchers (one for signing up for some members' card thing I've never used, the other a prize from the free scratchie that came with it). After 20 or 30 minutes being taught how to play craps I quit with $30 cash, which kept me in food and nicotine until I got paid two days later. Then I got to watch one of my housemates drop almost $100 in a minute on consecutive dumbass $5 and $10 yo bets. No surprise, we found out soon after that he was a compulsive gambler and had lied about his employment, and shortly after that he skipped the state, owing us around $5000.

      I love bright colours and flashy lights as much as the next person whose life ambition is to work their way through Erowid in alphabetical order but dammit, there are so many better places to see them. Buy yourself some holospex and come to a rave or something.

    22. Re:porn? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of people who know that the odds are against them but gamble for entertainment and because "you can't win if you don't play". Considering the amount of below-conscious-level manipulation that's involved in marketing porn, gambling is no less informed consent.

      I live in a pretty moralistic part of the country, and I'd say there's far more taboo to porn than to gambling. The state and a whole bunch of First Nations are involved in gambling, with outlets on every corner and casinos increasingly scattered wherever there are displaced Natives to be found. It's almost respectable, and generally tolerated. But porn is usually confined to bricks-and-mortar ghettos and the internet. Think of this way: Which do you think would raise more eyebrows at the office, someone announcing that he's going to Vegas to play cards, or announcing that he's going to Vegas to hire hookers?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    23. Re:porn? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      If I want to play cards, I can do it everywhere, with my friends for example. No need to throw away large sums of money in the process.

      But for some people that's part of the entertainment: the actual risk involved. Kind of like the difference between playing a car-racing game on your GameBox and actually racing cars.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    24. Re:porn? by shentino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sadly, they are similiar in that people cheat either way.

      Whether it's loaded dice or insider data, someone is always happy to rip someone else off.

    25. Re:porn? by Phantasmagoria · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is it so hard to understand that playing a game for stakes can be simple, recreational fun? Going into an evening of gambling with only the money you are prepared to lose is no different than going to a fair or holiday holding only the money you are prepared to spend on rides, gifts, foods, and frivolous purchases.

      --
      Loban Amaan Rahman ==> Anagram of ==> Aha! An Abnormal Man!
    26. Re:porn? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Even less, at a low-minimum blackjack table. I've parlayed $20 into two hours of playtime with drinks for me and my wife at a $1 table in Vegas. If you have enough bankroll to go down $40 or $50 you can ride out your low times and get to play blackjack for less than the cost of the drinks. Just quit when things are up, whether you're tired or not...

    27. Re:porn? by demonlapin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you never spend money on entertainment, you are either student-level poor, or a completely cheap bastard. So why get upset if other people have different ideas about what constitutes entertainment?

    28. Re:porn? by overbaud · · Score: 1

      Drugs = Dopamine release

      Gambling = Dopamine release

      Erowid / Casino = different pathways to same result

      Although casino probably has a cleaner comedown and less nausea (mushies, Ayahuasca etc.)

      --
      Users... the only thing keeping 1st level support from being the bottom feeders.
    29. Re:porn? by nsayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is one and only one way of winning in gamling. Luck.

      I don't know about gamling, but gambling is different.

      It all depends on the type of gambling involved. If you are playing against the house, then the only path for success is to attempt to exploit short term variance, because the long term odds always favor the house.

      However, if you're playing against other players - that is, if you're playing poker or you're a parimutuel player, then you can succeed simply by being more skillful than your opponents.

      Hint: The object of poker is not to win or lose the pot at hand. The object of poker is to make the correct decision at every opportunity. If every decision you make has the most positive expected value possible, then you will succeed.

    30. Re:porn? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      I just don't buy it, I don't see how it could be fun without the suspension of disbelief.

      Many forms of entertainment require willing suspension of disbelief.

    31. Re:porn? by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      Right, but in this case the suspension of disbelief can be directly harmful.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    32. Re:porn? by Bjorn_Redtail · · Score: 1

      I am reminded of an ad I once saw on television. "Luck is just probability taken personally"... I think it was acctually an ad for a Casino.

    33. Re:porn? by Hyler · · Score: 1

      Often times they are people that do it for recreation or fun knowing full well that they're losing money.

      Also, you could be lucky. Save some spare money (one maxim of gambling money management: Don't gamble with money you can't afford to lose) each month and in your old age you could have a pile of money. Or play slots/lottery and you could have a pile of money now.

      --
      It's its. They're their, there. You're your. Who's whose? A looser loser, though those two too threw through the trough.
    34. Re:porn? by phision · · Score: 1

      Actually you CAN win, and people DO win by gambling. So the average gambler is not fooling himself. If you think you WILL DEFINITELY WIN you are fooling yourself. So, knowing they may win, people gamble because they like the feeling of suspension. Of course, the other factors mentioned also contribute to the full casinos. As for the question in the article - i have worked for some time as a developer in the gambling industry. No one ever had mentioned it could be a black mark in my resume. And I have talked to some HRs and managers of other IT companies.

    35. Re:porn? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The difference is that, in Vegas, the players have at least a vague idea of the odds, are gambling with their own money, and understand the rules of the game.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    36. Re:porn? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You'd think so. As an undergrad, I played poker against a statistics post-doc, a mathematics student, a law student, and a sports science student. Most games were won by either myself or the sports science student...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    37. Re:porn? by Inda · · Score: 1

      Why does gambling have to involve casino games? I am a true 'punter' and have never entered a casino.

      I'll have 20 or 30 punts this weekend. All for about 50p each. All on sporting events. All for fun, not for the big win.

      And sporting events can be gamed. I'm up by 1000% this season due to all the non-draws at the start of the season. My favourite bookie got the odds terribly wrong on one game last week and I took him to the cleaners.

      Just keep the losing feeling in the back of the mind when betting though. That feeling is the one people experience most of all when playing.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    38. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just don't buy it, I don't see how it could be fun without the suspension of disbelief.

      If you are sitting at the bar putting quarters into the video poker machine (but only when the bartender is actually looking your way!), your beer is complementary. Think of it as rolling dice to see how much of a deduction you can get on your evening's bar tab.

    39. Re:porn? by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 1

      red taking the job but refrained to do it because you thought it might hurt your chances of getting other jobs. That is a very questionable moral and hypocritical. Please choose what you want to do with your life based on your own moral judgement.

      My moral code is consequential ethics, you insensitive clod!

      Eivind.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    40. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love bright colours and flashy lights as much as the next person whose life ambition is to work their way through Erowid in alphabetical order

      Erowid, Erowid.. Was he a doctor? A famous mathematician? I couldn't remember for a number of minutes why Erowid sounded like something I should know. Then it hits me and I realized exactly how much I love Erowid, perhaps a bit too much :)

    41. Re:porn? by DrLang21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because they are statistics pros doesn't mean they have studied the game theory of poker, nor does it mean they are trying. Sometimes it also depends on what kind of poker you are playing. Some versions are more predictable than others.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    42. Re:porn? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      The only way I could see it being fun is dreaming about winning big and fooling yourself into thinking it might happen.

      Gambling sells hope and dreams.

      Albeit false hope and delusional dreams but some people like that.

      I mean I still play the office pool lotto even though I know I am more statistically more likely to die in a freak accident than win, but it gives us something to talk about "What would you do with your money?" around the office. I suppose the conversation is worth the $1.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    43. Re:porn? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      I just don't buy it, I don't see how it could be fun without the suspension of disbelief.

      Are you talking about attending organized religion or about gambling?

    44. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, I was a math major for most of my college career, but I never looked up numbers on poker or tried to use my mathematical mind to that advantage when I played house games with people. I preferred the camaraderie and psychological aspect of poker anyway - trying to bluff, reading people, shooting the shit and getting a little drunk.

      I consider all of my gambling losses in college a pretty cheap and highly valuable form of entertainment, all things considered.

    45. Re:porn? by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      sure it *can* be, but for most it is not.
      I haven't been to a casino in quite a while (having kids strains the pocket book, and that was the first thing to go). When I did go to the casinos it was simple:
      You suspend disbelief even though part of you knows better. That part keeps vigilant and when you've spent enough money it kicks in and says "hey, let's go home".

      My shortest night was 5 minutes. I burned $50 in that 5 minutes, the tables were all $10.00 and up, and it was obvious that I was not going to have a fun night. So I took the other half of my planned $100 play money and the (now wife) and I went to a nice restaurant instead of the buffet.

      The folks that have problems are the ones that either lack that little part of the brain that watches over them, or they tell it to "shut-up I have to get back to even". IIRC the casinos actually don't want those people because they cause more problems then their money is worth. They usually don't have all that much, and tend to be problematic when their run is cut short by lack of funds.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    46. Re:porn? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      True, but I think you'll find that just about any job could cause issues later with someone. And given that people who have a choice tend to want to work for firms that match their own social/moral code, this may be worth thinking about.

      You could work for a mail-order company and have someone from a brick-and-mortar company dislike mail order firms, see one, and shred your resume without reading any further. You could work for Family Planning and find it impossible to find employment for religious organizations. Volunteering for the Young Conservative Movement could hurt your chances of working on a wind project as much as volunteer work for a liberal organization could cost you a possible office job in a logging company or defense contractor.

      There will always be people who disqualify your resume because they have personal (or professional) objections to something in your history. If you have core issues working in an industry, consider the fact that your career choices will naturally bias you toward similar-minded employers. This is only human - we want to work for someone or a company we respect, and one aspect of respect is (unfortunately) agreement on certain issues.

      So if you are personally uncomfortable enough about gambling to be concerned about accepting a job in the field, you may find that it's not the right choice for your long-term career, because it will remain a "skeleton in the closet" to you. If you want to work in the future for people who are more closely aligned to your own moral compass, then you may find it's a detriment to your career.

      On the other hand, if you're avoiding the job because you think others might have objections to gambling (but you don't), then it would stand a relatively low chance of affecting your career, because you're not tending to seek employment by people who dislike gambling. It still might, but then again you also might come out ahead on the slot machines too. Neither is very likely. :)

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    47. Re:porn? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      It's simple enough.

      I'm in Vegas, I have $40 in my pocket with no intention of spending any more, and want to be entertained for four hours, preferably with some good food and a little booze involved. I can do one of two basic things:

      1. Walk around Vegas, watch the floor shows and other people gambling, and buy a nice meal and maybe a drink or three sometime during the process. (this is what I would do).

      2. Take my $40 and stick at one casino, visibly gambling and losing slowly, and wait for someone to offer me a meal card to the buffet and a drink or two. Get probably about the same meal I could have bought at one of the Vegas restaurants, and be entertained by the flashing lights and the people walking by.

      Overall, I've spent the same $40 and received the same basic entertainment value.

      Yes, there are people who would bring all their money and gamble it all, then cash in their return ticket and hock their undies for a couple more bucks for "one more hit at the one-armed monster". Gambling, as an industry, does not exist primarily to serve such people. Most of them will self-destruct and/or go into some form of GamblersAnon program. A good casino sees the signs and sends the person back to their room with a comped meal before they ruin themselves. They generate bad press while simultaneously not really making the casino a steady income.

      The steady, reliable money comes from people who rent hotel rooms, gamble well within their means, and buy or are comped meals. And there's really little difference whether you buy the meal and watch the gambling for free, or participate in the gambling and get the meal for free. The house always gets your money, and you always get fed.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    48. Re:porn? by cyber-dragon.net · · Score: 1

      And I would hire a programmer of gambling sites much faster than a PR guy from a tobacco company ;)

    49. Re:porn? by cyber-dragon.net · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree... I'd spend $50 on the chance I might win some money back and have fun doing it. I can drop that at a fancy restaurant or a night at the pub.

      Some people spend $300 to watch a season of football, no chance you'll get anything out of that :)

    50. Re:porn? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Gambling, pretty much by definition, has to work with people who don't know what they are doing.

      That statement is patently ridiculous.

      Some people--myself included--enjoy gambling. The camaraderie at the craps table. The excitement at the poker table. The time with friends, the free drinks, the cocktail waitresses.

      When I go gambling, I bring with me no more money than I would spend on an ordinary night out on the town, attending a professional sporting event, etc. Sometimes I lose the money I brought--sometimes I bring home a little more money than I brought (and everywhere in between)--but I always have a good time, win or lose.

      Perhaps you know what I'm doing better than I do, as you assert. Personally, I think you are simply wrong on this point.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    51. Re:porn? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      There is one and only one way of winning in gamling. Luck.
      Don't laugh. I know lucky people, and I'm not one of them.
      The people I know have gambled a lot their whole life, with quite a profit. Not horse racing or anything where guessing is possible. If you know your math, you'll know that's very very improbalble without luck. Plain luck.

      That doesn't make any sense. Nobody has better luck than anybody else. Some people are better at capitalizing on their luck than others, however.

      In the case of your friends, I'm willing to bet that the "lucky" ones suffer from "selective memory". In other words, you are probably hearing only the tales of glory and are not hearing the tales of woe.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    52. Re:porn? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      If your enjoyment of gambling is tied to the winning of money, then you will never enjoy gambling; as if you knew beforehand that you were guaranteed to win, it would cease to be gambling (by the dictionary definition of the word).

      Some people do enjoy it as a form of entertainment--clearly you do not. But that is just a personal preference, in the same way that I do not enjoy golf or knitting or croquet as forms of entertainment. That does not entitle me to say that golf and knitting are not fun, as plenty of people do enjoy those activities.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    53. Re:porn? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      You don't play big, you don't win big.

      So yeah, you can play your dollar stakes poker, but try playing 100 dollar stakes poker with your friends and keeping them as friends.

      And some game you need a house to back.

      There is nothing wrong with gambling to ahve a good time.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    54. Re:porn? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Gambling, pretty much by definition, has to work with people who don't know what they are doing. "

      No, most people who gamble know the odd are in the house favor.
      Most of them ahve decided to risk X amount of money to ahve a good time.

      Logically, gambling is the smart way to spend your vacation money because there is a chance you can win it back or come out ahead.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    55. Re:porn? by polemistes · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying it makes sense. And I'm not saying they don't lose most of the time, and that their playing isn't irrational, and believe me, there has been tales of woe.
      But I know people who has won big several times, each time more than they'll ever spend. Winning like that one time should happen just once every 1000 years. And I know, winning twice should then happen every 2000 years, so that's almost the same degree of impossible. But I would still call it some quite concentrated luck.

      In that light, I see the best strategy of winning when gambling is to bet as little as possible where the possibility of the biggest win is. Since the only way of winning is to have luck, and if you have it you'll win with little effor, and if you don't have luck, you'll lose a lot, even though you sometimes win a little.

    56. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It all depends on the type of gambling involved. If you are playing against the house, then the only path for success is to attempt to exploit short term variance, because the long term odds always favor the house.

      It's a fine point, but this is not always the case. There have been instances of where the house set the rules or dealer guidelines for the game without realizing the full implication. Thorp, who started the blackjack counting craze with his book Beat The Dealer, also found some quirks in the rules used for baccarat in many casinos. His team began to take advantage of them and won quite a bit of money. The house did catch on and changed the rules, but it shouldn't necessarily be assumed the house always knows what it's doing.

      Quite a few years ago I used to count cards at blackjack. I was in one of the downtown casinos in Las Vegas at a table that still was offering single-deck without horrible rule changes. It was just me and one other player at the table. After a while I noticed the dealer was shuffling at odd points through the deck. Sometimes we'd get four or five hands before a shuffle, sometimes just one or two. It didn't seem to have anything to do with how many cards were dealt. Following severals decks of observation and a little experimentation I determined the dealer would shuffle whenever either of us players increased our bet.

      On the surface this seems like a reasonable strategy for the house. Increased bets are a sign of card counters finding a favorable situation, so you randomize things and start over. But I realized you could easily turn this strategy on its head. Rather than increase my bet when the count indicates a favorable situation for me, I increase my bet when the deck goes the other way. The dealer shuffles because I increased my bet, and now I'm playing against a neutral deck. In other words, I need NEVER play in an unfavorable situation. I can arrange to play against only neutral and positive situations. If the deck goes positive after a shuffle, I leave my larger bet out there and it's just like I increased my bet in a plus situation. It would have been a goldmine if I'd had the table to myself. Unfortunately, the other guy was changing his bet randomly and ruining many of the positive situations. Still, it was an example of the house doing something that could easily be turned against them.

    57. Re:porn? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      It's amazing how; if we just cut out a few bits from your post

      No, most people who gamble know the odd are in the house favor. [..] because there is a chance you can win it back or come out ahead.

      we suddenly realise that there's a very virulent gambling addict stream of thought on Slashdot. I really hadn't realised. I find this quite deeply funny.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    58. Re:porn? by WNight · · Score: 1

      Because that's bullshit. If the game in question was a fun one then perhaps betting some money on it might not suck. But if the game is pulling a lever and watching it multiply(/divide) your money it's obviously not being played for the sake of the game itself.

      And in a real game, big winners make out big. In a casino if you show skill and luck they'll show you the door.

      So no. Nobody without a gambling addiction will believe you.

      It's not just working in the gambling industry that's a black mark...

    59. Re:porn? by WNight · · Score: 1

      Upset? Well I wasn't crying about it...

      But they're lying. If they really considered pushing a button and watching flashing lights to be fun they'd buy infant toys - they also make annoying sounds!

      About the only thing left is gambling addiction...

    60. Re:porn? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you know what I'm doing better than I do, as you assert. Personally, I think you are simply wrong on this point.

      No; I don't know what you are doing. You may well be doing what you state you are doing in which case you are not contributing to the income of the guy who posted the original article. I also; lets be clear about this; have enjoyed games of poker for money. However that money has always been small and stayed between friends. Bridge wouldn't be the same without it. What's stupid is letting the house get a bigger cut than would be justified by an evening out at a similarly nice restaurant where you could also (in all civilised countries) play poker.

      Quoting the first random report on the subject I found on google (for Australia as it happens) "The Productivity Commission concluded that problem gamblers accounted for around one third of all total expenditure on gambling.". The thing is that these are a small number of gamblers (the existence of a problem is clear if you read the report, but the exact definition of a "problem gambler" is difficult) but they generate a huge proportion of the income. More importantly, they generate a small propoportion of the costs of the gambling industry (it costs the same to keep them in the casino as you, but they give a much bigger pay back).

      I have nothing against you gambling. I have lots against the people who base their income on profit from gambling. Because you likely generate little profit, these two things have no relation.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    61. Re:porn? by WNight · · Score: 1

      There's a lot wrong with gambling for fun. The biggest is that it trains you to be passive and accept what you're given. The fastest way to get anything is sit here and pull on the lever until it drops from the sky.

      It's also bad because it keeps you from developing any ways to have fun that don't involve gambling. A gambler is pretty much the last person to be able to entertain themselves.

      That said, go ahead and gamble. Not only are there exceptions, but you should be free to use heroin if you want.

      That's it though, while it's your choice and there are voluntary heroin users out there, the vast majority are not having fun. Casinos, like pushers, use the 1% of non-sufferers to pretend they aren't destroying the lives of the other 99%.

    62. Re:porn? by DarkMage0707077 · · Score: 1

      As a video game player, I find that I can actually get enjoyment from gambling (blackjack being a personal favorite) in a similiar manner. The difference being that, while V-games have a more action/story as a reward for playing well, gambling has apayout of something concrete (chips/money/etc) as a reward for playing well.

      Heck, I remember spending many a dollar with my friends when I was young just putting tokens/quarters into the "gambling machines" you'll find at all (smart) arcades that spit out tickets. Sure winning tickets was awesome, but it was also the possibility of winning that was exciting for me as well.

    63. Re:porn? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Infant toys don't bring you drinks. A night of playing with infant toys has exactly zero percent chance of seeing some hot women (although the same is true of some casinos). And so forth.

      Look, I usually don't enjoy gambling, and I HATE slots. But I understand that other people do, and they'e not necessarily stupid for thinking what they do.

    64. Re:porn? by kelnos · · Score: 1

      In addition to what the other reply said, it also isn't certain that the stats post-doc was always making decisions based on the statistics. Just like anyone else, his decisions were undoubtedly influenced to some degree by emotions, sometimes not so much, sometimes strongly.

      And even if you *are* going by the stats, there's always the human element, and the fact that you're playing against other people who have their own different strengths and faults. Unless everyone around the table is a computer, you can't expect to always play well based solely on the math.

      --
      Xfce: Lighter than some, heavier than others. Just right.
    65. Re:porn? by gowen · · Score: 1

      I just don't buy it, I don't see how it could be fun without the suspension of disbelief.

      So, what you're saying is "It doesn't appeal to me, therefore it shouldn't appeal to anyone". Solipsistic, much?

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    66. Re:porn? by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      If the wheels and the lights are enough to keep people entertained, then why aren't businesses with a bunch of wheels and lights but no gambling around? I don't think I come from a position of Solipsism when I say that.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    67. Re:porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, most people who gamble know the odd are in the house favor. [..] because there is a chance you can win it back or come out ahead.

      we suddenly realise that there's a very virulent gambling addict stream of thought on Slashdot. I really hadn't realised. I find this quite deeply funny.

      How so? Let's say the house has a 60/40 advantage (in reality the numbers are closer). And let's say that someone has budgeted $50 for a night of gambling. If they lose it all, it's $50 spent on entertainment. Yet, there is indeed a chance that you can "win it back or come out ahead", as the OP put it. A 40% chance to be exact.

    68. Re:porn? by WNight · · Score: 1

      People keep talking about free(hah) drinks like it's a good thing. Not only do they bring you drinks to make you stupid, but the drinks cost them very little and they only give them to people who are wasting a lot of money.

      But I understand that other people do, and they'e not necessarily stupid for thinking what they do.

      No, just for acting on it.

      It's like saying that because alcoholics do honestly enjoy much of their drinking that it becomes a valid social activity and shouldn't be questioned.

      Yes, pretty girls are still pretty in a casino, and drinks taste good, but that's not a good reason to throw money away hoping for a big win, nor does some enjoyment during the process make it an efficient use of resources.

      It's the difference between saying "I went gambling and had fun" and "For fun, I go gambling". People who say the latter are stupid(/addicted), even if they truthfully can say the former.

    69. Re:porn? by nsayer · · Score: 1

      What you've gone on to describe is exactly what I was saying - you are attempting to exploit a short term variance to overcome the long term house edge.

      You are skillfully determining the existence of such a variance, that's all.

  3. Personally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Personally, I've never heard of this. But do you really want to gamble with your career?

    /rimshot

    1. Re:Personally by Fareq · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've never heard of this. But do you really want to gamble with your career? /rimshot

      I get the pun, but...

      Realistically, whatever decisions you make regarding your career are made without foreknowledge of how they'll turn out.

      No matter what you do, you're gambling with your career. Short of not having one, anyway.

      Or, I guess you could say "You can't win if you don't play"

  4. Uh, what? by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, as a hiring manager I care if you can do the job I am hiring you for. If that's software development then that means I'm looking for education, experience, and successfully completed projects. I really can't delve into the minds of HR types so I guess they might hold it against you in the more conservative parts of the country, but they are generally used as a glorified GREP from what I have seen.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Uh, what? by NoYob · · Score: 1
      I would think that the gambling companies wouldn't be named "Joe's Online Gambling". If anything, they're named things like "Tabcorp Holdings Limited". So, the HR folks won't see it off the bat, anyway.

      The job description is going to be something like, "Designed and developed Swing interface. Developed probability engine for calculating permutations and combinations."

      The gambling industry, especially the electronic slot machines is pretty impressive firmware. I'd be bragging about it myself.

      Writing adult websites, on the other hand, I I would stick to being as vague as possible.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    2. Re:Uh, what? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      Seriously, as a hiring manager I care if you can do the job I am hiring you for.

      Generally the amount of damage a new hire can do is much more than the amount of good. In most companies an intelligent employee can find ways to steal millions from the company or at least cause that much damage. You probably do this automatically, but if you think someone is lying or cheating in their interview process that should definitely rule them out, even if they are technically able to "do the job"

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    3. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say if you manage to work in the gambling industry writing software for an extended period of time (more than six months) without a felony conviction that your integrity is probably safe. In fact, probably safer than someone working in a number of other industries. Personal opinions will often influence decisions though. I wouldn't expect to get hired for a job with a religious institution, or the state of Utah after working in gaming or porn, but other industries may be more than welcome.

    4. Re:Uh, what? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Really the number of people who would see working for a gambling industry as your job as a black mark. Is probably the same as the people who saw that you worked for a consulting firm, or a bank, or even a Not-for-profit as a black mark.

      Gambling you will be a black mark for either Religious conservatives or ultra liberal don't let people do stupid things groups.
      Consulting means you are a union buster so the left wing pro Union people see you as a threat.
      Bank well right now banks are evil why didn't you software tell those people that these mortgages will fail. And why didn't it play a siren when it did.
      Not-for-profit you must be one of them long hair hippies who must have no idea how real business works.

      I know a lot of people who worked for a lot of distasteful companies. Why? they needed the money and the distasteful companies tend to pay better. Most do offer some good or service that actually helps the general population even though there may be side effects that don't

      With the exception of Google most companies what skilled people to do the work they don't care for their political standing.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Uh, what? by Ash+Vince · · Score: 2, Informative

      Generally the amount of damage a new hire can do is much more than the amount of good. In most companies an intelligent employee can find ways to steal millions from the company or at least cause that much damage.

      This is actually very relevant to the original posters question. One of my friends recently went back to work in the gambling industry at a company he had worked for previously. Even though he had several years prior experience at the same company he still had to go through a mountain of security check including contacting all the employers he had worked for in the interim since he left the first place. Working at a company that runs a high value website involving large amounts of money is only going to help your CV in the UK. In the states you might have to be a bit more vague, but until he gets there this job will be damn good on his CV.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    6. Re:Uh, what? by st0nes · · Score: 1

      I care if you can do the job I am hiring you for

      Precisely. I started off working in the horse-racing racing industry, then a lottery and scratch card operator, then cellphone networks and retailers, now I'm with a major drug dealer. The drug dealer gave me a hairy eyeball over the cellphone networks, not the gambling outfits.

      --
      Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis
    7. Re:Uh, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      delve into the minds of HR types

      Error: File Not Found.

  5. No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work in the Gaming Industry in Nevada. Its not a black-mark on your resume from any societal/value thing. However, its a boring, crappy, narrow-minded industry. get out now and do something more interesting.

  6. Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by khasim · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why would it be a black mark?

    If anything, it shows that you can work in a highly regulated field that moves a LOT of money around at a LOT of locations with HIGH security.

    As long as none of your references are named Guido, you should be fine.

    1. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Kenja · · Score: 3, Funny

      Depends. Working on machine code for the slot & other game systems used in Vegas is a VERY highly regulated industry.

      Working on an online gambling site run out of the Cayman Islands is not.

      I would higher someone from the first industry to work on something as important as electronic voting systems. I wouldn't hire someone from the second to mow my lawn.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by spartacus_prime · · Score: 1

      That's a lovely code you've got there. It would be a shame if anything...happened to it.

      --
      If you can read this, it means that I bothered to log in.
    3. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Zadaz · · Score: 5, Informative

      The guys I know who have worked on Vegas slot machines are right up there with avionics programmers for writing reliably bulletproof code. And they're higher security. If one of them was ever looking for work I'd hire them in a second. If I could afford them.

      Offshore Poker programmer? Meh. Not really a plus or a minus compared to most other web programmers. What else you got?

    4. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In the gambling industry you're going to be around some people who rub elbows with some real cuthroat businessmen. You'll see things and talk with people who've been in low places.

      Those people will be your managers.

      Do it. Especially if you're young. You'll be learning so much from such a safe place.

      I'd hire you just to hear your stories.

    5. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      The guys I know (not personally acquaintances of acquaintances who worked with them) who have worked on slot machines are in jail. Their clever programing back doors were no match for their inability to launder money at or above a fourth grade level.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    6. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by KevinKnSC · · Score: 5, Funny

      As long as none of your references are named Guido, you should be fine.

      I guess Python isn't used much in the gambling industry.

    7. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      IGT is one of the worlds largest suppliers of slot machines, and trust me, they hire just as many mediocre programmers as any other industry. The thing is that because releases of slot machines and other gaming devices throughout the US is so heavily regulated that they have better quality control and testing procedures than most other industries. The on top of that the gaming commissions from each state that allow gaming follow up with their own testing procedures and protocols. Even with all of that slots with bugs still get out. There were three men recently arrested on the east coast for getting a slot tech to put a machine into a different game mode, and then used a series of rapid button presses/screen changes to cause the slot to fail and award erroneous jackpots. They apparently got about $300k before it was figured out what was going on. Of course the fact that they always hit on the same machine should have been the first clue to casino staff.

      As for it being a black mark on your resume... well that's probably one of the stupidest things I've ever heard of unless of course this person is indeed referring to offshore/shady gambling sites. Not that there aren't or can't be legitimate online gaming sources, just that I wouldn't trust most of them.

    8. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never been to the Monty Python Casino.

    9. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by HangingChad · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why would it be a black mark?

      It would around here, in a lot of places. One of the developers I used to work with interviewed at a company that had a banner that read "God Supervises This Office" in the lobby.

      Outside southern red states including, ironically, one or two with a healthy gaming industry, it would probably be an advantage. It means you can work in high security areas around a lot of money, don't have any felonies in your background and can work in an environment that's not particularly tolerant of mistakes.

      Personally, if a right wing, dogmatic, Bible-thumping company owner didn't want to hire me I'd consider that a badge of honor.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    10. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      If anything, it shows that you can work in a highly regulated field that moves a LOT of money around at a LOT of locations with HIGH security.

      I agree 100%.

      Much like working in the porn industry (on the tech side, I mean), they [generally] use the latest and greatest of technologies and practices for security. The gambling industry was one of the first to utilize large deployments of quantum random number generators among other, similar technologies.

      Personally, I think that when it comes to quality of experience, I think banks, porn and gambling companies are at the bleeding edge of tech and the exposure to their technologies will make you a better developer.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    11. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a load of manure. In the gambling industry as a software engineer you are going to be working with other engineers in cubes. Your managers will be the people that were either very good at what they did but wanted more money and so gave up the engineering aspect or those promoted to their level of incompetence.

    12. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah I wouldn't send any resumes to the LDS church in Salt Lake City, Utah. You have to be a Mormon to work for them.

      But IMO most places only care about relevant experience.

    13. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked as an ME for a slot machine company. Same as any other job. It was completely reputable and I never ran into anyone shady. It was more of a video game development environment then a seedy gambling company.

    14. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I don't know, if I got a reference from someone named Guido saying "hire this guy", that's a pretty good reference :-)

    15. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Highly regulated means, that there are tons of people trying to work around the regulations. Which are usually people who are already doing that everywhere else. Like fixing bets at sports events etc. Never EVER work in that industry. It's basically an arm of the different mafias. And soon you'll find yourself doing other stuff that your moral forbids to do. It's like a slippery slope right into crime life.

      I know, because unfortunately, a friend of mine fell it it. And I nearly too.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    16. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guido came asking about you, says he doesn't appreciate you disrespecting him.

    17. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You have to be a Mormon to work for them.

      ...with a current and valid Temple Recommend to boot (that is, you can't be just any ol' LDS member). I was once approached about some contract work for them (I lived in Sugarhouse at the time, just south of SLC). The interview was pretty cool up until they explained that particular requirement (being Catholic, I obviously didn't have one, nor the desire to attain one. Pity... it sounded like a pretty cool gig).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    18. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by denalione · · Score: 1

      I live in the south in the middle of the Bible Belt and doubt very seriously that it would be a problem. Granted this is all anecdotal but pretty much any answer on this topic will be:

      1. Most developer positions are in the bigger cities which are much more cosmopolitan than the rural areas. Most of the people I've worked for and with were from the west coast, up north or Florida.

      2. While I have met a few fundamentalists in my career its pretty rare. There ain't a lot of "snake-handlers" doing OO programming.

      3. The Christians I have worked for have been very open about hiring. They wanted people who could do the job regardless. The only requirement was that their personal beliefs didn't get in the way of doing the job and cause contention at the office. I've not seen a problem yet.

      4. Most of the people I know who live in sticks (a lot of my family included) and would be considered "fundies" just because of their association with the Bible Belt would find you interesting and would probably invite you to their weekly poker night.

      5. I think you would have just as much trouble finding a job in the south after working for a gambling concern as you would in the north after working for the Southern Baptist Convention.

    19. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a low level dev, you are correct.
      But I had to do audits and was followed around the casino by big guys in dark suits that blocked my path more than once and said "I'm sorry, that area is under maintenance."
      I went to the floor & called my manager and he said "just go around them, we need you to check those."
      Then went back to the room and they said "You can't go in there. It wouldn't be _safe_ for you."
      After I got back to the office, my manager thought it was funny. He even joked "the desert is a big place. they could bury you out there and nobody would know."

    20. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by adamkennedy · · Score: 1

      I concur with the parent.

      I work in logistics, which has about the same reputation for being boring as gambling has for being morally distasteful.

      If you're configuring networks or doing desktop support or doing the same kind of work that you'd do in any other company, then that might invoke painting an industry stigma.

      On the other hand, if you are doing the bits of that industry that are genuinely interesting from an engineering perspective then that's quite a different story.

      My industry is boring, but there's something quite interesting about moving billions of dollars of material to 100,000s of people across a whole continent while never going down and never losing data.

      Similarly, the gambling industry probably has great areas like those mentioned about. I'd throw in touch screen tech, graphics, electronics and proof-carrying software and a few other areas where experience in that area would be a positive.

      And if you were actually involved in the math of the game design, massive bonus points.

    21. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure the $12B LVS, $8B Wynn resorts and $5B MGM Mirage corp are all very mobbed up....

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    22. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by losethisurl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps they should've looked up money laundering in the dictionary.

      --
      Seriously, is it supposed to look like that?
    23. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by headhot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I read that as "Moron"

    24. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't mind if Guido Van Rossum writes a reference for me...

    25. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, if a right wing, dogmatic, Bible-thumping company owner didn't want to hire me I'd consider that a badge of honor.

      Around here, I'd consider it an opportunity to collect unemployment again. A few years ago I had one job offer rescinded when someone remembered seeing me on TV talking about gay rights issues. A couple months ago I got a job at a place where God is in item 1 of the company's 4-part mission statement, and every formal staff meeting opens with a prayer or an inspirational Bible verse. I won't close my eyes, but I've decided that it's a good idea to bow my head when everyone else does, so they see me raising it again as they open their eyes.

    26. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the gambling industry you're going to be around some people who rub elbows with some real cuthroat businessmen. You'll see things and talk with people who've been in low places.

      Don't you mean the Finance industry?

    27. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by rakslice · · Score: 1
    28. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, isn't the Monte Python casino like the most famous casino in Europe ever?

    29. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I have to disagree. I had an employer that was outwardly a bible-thumper but was as crooked as the day is long.

      Personally, if a right wing, dogmatic, Bible-thumping company owner didn't want to hire me I'd consider that a badge of honor.
      Reply to This

      And are we to assume that you've never encountered a left wing, dogmatic, Clinton/Obama groupie wannabe?

      Dogmatic people are a pain in the ass no matter what side they come down on.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    30. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that a resampling joke? Because something just made a whooshing noise around here...

    31. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Do they actually live inside of large hollow 'sticks', or in houses made of 'sticks'?
      I've never seen people living in sticks here in the city, it must be something you only see out in the STYX.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    32. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offshore Poker programmer? Meh. Not really a plus or a minus compared to most other web programmers. What else you got?

      Well, that would put his code and the systems hosting it as targets of quite formidable attacks. If his systems are not reliable, secure and available, the company could lose 200k-500k an hour. That environment should develop some capable people by the process of elimination (stress).

    33. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      14. sticks n. Informal
      a. A remote area; backwoods: moved to the sticks.
      b. A city or town regarded as dull or unsophisticated.
      - The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language

      Phrase Sticks "rural place" is 1905, from sticks in slang sense of "trees" (cf. backwoods).
      - Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2001 Douglas Harper

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    34. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, if a right wing, dogmatic, Bible-thumping company owner didn't want to hire me I'd consider that a badge of honor.

      And you can proudly wear that badge of honor while you're standing in the dole queue!

      The hiring managers who consider working for a betting company a sign of poor personal ethics don't care whether Slashdot or the lauded liberal left think "conservatives are horrible" or "then you must be a right wing Bible thumper". You can whine and make unprofessional bitchy comments about the company owner all you like; you're still not hired. And the more you whine, the more they'll just think "I'm glad I didn't hire that whiner!"

    35. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's because you are a "Moron"...

    36. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're a fucking idiot. Does the term "mark" mean anything to you? Shit, you might as well tell your young blonde daughter with big tits and a heavy lisp that she will make it as an actress in hollywood - if not just for the experience.

      Goddamn, what is it about paid serial killers that turns people on? Let me assure you, they ain't cool, they ain't romantic, they don't follow rules, most of them can't run a business for shit, and if they think you got something they want they will put a knife to your throat and tell you to put a trojan on the system or die. You get to go to prison when it's all said and done, they walk with the money or you get to hide for the rest of your life.

    37. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on what industries you work in. I work in security and my history of working within the gambling industry is DEFINITELY considered a black mark. It gets flagged by secuity audits and security clearance organisations as something to followup closely and usually results in annoying and expensive delays while they do more thorough background checks (even though my record is perfectly clean). So yeah it can be a black mark on your career. Incidently it may be high security in casinos etc, but the online industry is a disgrace with extremely low quality security being almost universal. Hell many of the big ones still use email as a means to send credit card details for verification.

    38. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by beuges · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've worked on both. I spent 6 years working on online gambling software and my former employer is very highly regarded, both for their software as well as their staff, benefits, etc.

      I currently work on casino management software for land-based casinos - software that manages player accounts, points and rewards allocations and redemptions, slot and table accounting - pretty much everything to do with the casino. (I've also had other jobs and positive interviews for other jobs in other completely unrelated industries, so it's also not a case of being stuck in the industry once you've entered it).

      Funny enough, despite the fact that I need to have a gambling board license for the current job, and that our software needs to be tested and certified by an independent verification lab, and then certified and licensed by the gambling board, the quality of the software produced by my completely unregulated previous employer was light years ahead of the stuff I've inherited at my current job.
      Despite having two gambling related jobs on my CV, I've had no problems with recruitment agents hassling me for interviews despite the job slump, so I think the perceived black mark is very subjective and due to misplaced perceptions about the industry - in fact, it appears that you have incorrect assumptions about the industries yourself, most likely arising purely from perceptions, rather than actual exposure to either industry from the inside.

      Although the online gambling industry is not regulated, the various big players in the market have a very huge incentive to be completely legit - firstly, most of the big suppliers have their software and accounts independently audited as a piece-of-mind assurance to their players. Secondly, there is absolutely no incentive to crook the payouts, as the serious players would notice this in an instant and your reputation would fall through the floor overnight (besides, an online casino has much less overhead than a physical one, and can afford higher payout percentages rather than forcing lower payouts through dubious means). Finally, the competition between online casinos is very intense - players generally have accounts across a dozen different casinos and will choose the one that has the best bonuses, best games, best features, and best overall playability without much regard to loyalty at all. This means that online casino developers need to be able to predict the markets demands and adapt their software ahead of the competition much faster than the land-based developers need to, which in turns leads to online casino development houses looking for the best of the best to satisfy their requirements.

      tl;dr: there's nothing wrong or shady about hiring people that have worked in large, reputable gambling companies, just like any other industry. Of course there are shady "gambling" sites, but you get those in any industry. My former employer's reputation of hiring excellent staff and producing excellent online gambling software makes their name on my CV a seal of approval - in many interviews, the interviewer raises an eyebrow at the fact that I left there voluntarily, and on numerous occasions have dropped a comment about the fact that they've heard many good things about them.

    39. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by TheMCP · · Score: 1

      Moreover, it not only shows those things, but if you had gambling industry experience and good references from it and you came to me and outright said "This demonstrates that I am trustworthy and have experience with high security software handling large dollar volume," I would take you *more* seriously as a job candidate, not less.

    40. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Interesting'?

      There's no 'Fantasist' option is there.

    41. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US maybe: you lot have a giant fucking stick up your ass about gambling, for some reason. In the EU (the questioner is in the UK) the industry is mature, regulated and respectable.

    42. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by rmccann · · Score: 1

      They can legally not hire you because of your religion? In the European Union, that's very illegal.

    43. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 3, Funny

      Coming soon!

      A young blonde actress with big tits and a heavy lisp goes to Hollywood to make it big in film. Refusing to let corrupt producers have their way with her, her acting career is over before it began.

      Faced with tough decisions, a choice between stripping or prostitution, she surprises everyone by falling into the seedy underworld of systems administration for the gambling industry... life would be simpler if she chose instead to work the streets...

      Uma Thurman in ...

      MAXIMUM ENTROPY!

      ... who said you coldn't fsck /dev/random.

    44. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A mistake probably means you're not working again .. ever .. at least not with your fingers.

    45. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Churches in the US can get away with a lot of stuff other organizations can't. Any ordinary US company who even asked about religion during an interview would be in trouble.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    46. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by n1ckml007 · · Score: 1

      Personally I would take a reference from Guido van Rossum any day!

    47. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Now you're thinking like fifth grader!

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    48. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably even an advantage down there as in the major urban areas most of those states really aren't stereotypical "southern" any longer, especially Texas & Florida...

      While I personally have little interest in gambling, I wouldn't hesitate to work for them, after all a job is a job and if the pay and benefits are above average so much the better, but as the the above poster stated you might into trouble with some christian fanatics. I also happen to agree with the above poster in that I would consider that to be a badge of honor and wouldn't take a job with such people even if offered as religious fanaticism of all sorts irks me more than just about anything else in life.

    49. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the angel that read Joseph the book was named Moroni, so you are not that far off.

    50. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by dragoncortez · · Score: 1

      Wait, can someone please explain to me why this is modded insightful? I can understand funny, but insightful?

      --
      Making stupid comments so you don't have to.
    51. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by foqn1bo · · Score: 1

      Totally! While we're at it, let's beef that up with a few other ethnic and racial stereotypes!

      "As long as none of your references are named Dmitri, you should be fine" (eh? eh? RUSSIANS)
      "As long as none of your references are named Deshawn, you should be fine" (black people are scary)
      "As long as none of your references have Hussein for a middle name, you should be fine" (goes without saying)

      I'm sure you can probably think of some others.

    52. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Nitage · · Score: 1

      No it isn't - it would be illegal for a company, but religious organistations are exempt from that.

    53. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by natehoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tax benefits AND the right to discriminate openly?

      Hell, if I start a business, it's going to be a religion.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    54. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read that as "Moron"

      Same thing really

    55. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Joe was a moron who dreamed of angels, so yeah, the story is way off.

    56. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by rve · · Score: 1

      Why would it be a black mark?

      In many states and countries, gambling is illegal or otherwise controlled.

      Over here, gambling is only allowed in government controlled casinos, and all forms of online gambling are illegal.

      Of course you can't stop people from using gambling sites hosted abroad, but such sites are considered criminal organizations. I doubt a programmer would be arrested on conspiracy charges just for having worked on gambling related software, but companies that require a background check might not want to take the risk, if another candidate doesn't have such a shady past.

      Myself, I don't like gambling, so as with everything I don't like, I feel it should be banned :)

    57. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by cartman94501 · · Score: 1

      This is biased. Plenty of people are named Guido, and most of them are not attached to organized crime.

    58. Re:Isn't that a highly regulated industry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read that as "Moron"

      Same thing.

  7. Why? by DogDude · · Score: 1

    Why would it be? I started my software career in porn, and it worked out well for me. What kind of employer cares what industry you've developed software for in the past?

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seriously, I think that porn and gambling are excellent proving grounds for a programmer. In the case of websites, these are extremely high demand websites that process a large number of financial transactions, where uptime is vital to revenues, and where there is a high level of attempted cracking and DoS activity. In the case of embedded systems for casinos it's an extremely precise, highly regulated practice where the product must be hardened against attack and must provide a high level of reliability while processing a large number of transactions.

      Programmers move bits around. Whether those bits stand for insurance policies, black jack hands, or naughty bits shouldn't really matter to a hiring manager...what should matter is how well you communicate, how well you estimate, and how effectively you move bits around.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The kinds who are hiring.

  8. Never heard of it by mrsam · · Score: 1

    Sounds like an old wife's tale. Never heard of anything like this.

    I just remembered that over ten years ago I worked for a company that supplied software for state lotteries. That was many jobs ago, and I don't recall that ever becoming any kind of an issue. And, on my resumes I described that job just like all others on my resume. And, as far as my "career" as a software developer, I am making a few orders of magnitude now, then back then. No complaints about my career -- and in the financial industry to boot, where any sniff of something bad in one's background gets you permanently blackballed.

  9. Suppose you could go work for a porn site by tylersoze · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Suppose you could go work for a porn site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is still a taboo about the porn industry in the non-porn Hollywood entertainment industries. Not sure how much of that traditional Hollywood is hiring devs and IT staff directly, though.

      If you run a business and you want to sell to the Disneys of the world it is best to go through a reseller with a low profile if you also want to sell to the porn industry.

  10. Yes - by rtfa-troll · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Gambling is about screwing money out of stupid, statistically illiterate and not entirely mentally stable people. A large chunk of those people do not, whatever slashdot groupthink may sometimes seem to say, deserve it (there is no groupthink, just random bunch of nerds). You will be earning money from other people's suffering. Doing it for long or doing it often is not a sign of a person I want on my team.

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    1. Re:Yes - by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Gambling is about screwing money out of stupid, statistically illiterate and not entirely mentally stable people."

      So is marketing.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Yes - by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      So how's this different than working for, say Microsoft?

      At least if you work for the gambling industry, your customers have an infinitesimal chance.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    3. Re:Yes - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, neither are. But they are morally equivalent, yes.

    4. Re:Yes - by rakslice · · Score: 1

      So what line of work are you in? =)

    5. Re:Yes - by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      A major one.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  11. Not as bad as playboy / other porn fields by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Not as bad as playboy / other porn fields.

    and Gambling is bigger on security tech then most other places even most of the us gov.

    1. Re:Not as bad as playboy / other porn fields by gmack · · Score: 1

      After working in that industry I disagree. Even some of the larger sites I've worked for have had some pretty hideous security practices.

  12. A job is a job by FoolishBluntman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In today's economy, a job is a job
    Maybe if this, working for the gambling industry, is your concern, you don't really need a job.

    1. Re:A job is a job by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Worst case scenario, he says he was unemployed during that period.

      But you'll always offend somebody. I was turned down for a job with a company once, and someone I knew got in, despite having lower grades, aptitude test results and everything. Found out later the company was full of pacifists and I'd worked on military projects.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So teamwork would have been hard.

      Decision good.

    3. Re:A job is a job by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In today's economy

      Everybody who uses that excuse, should be shot on sight.

      - Hey, normally I don't like being raped for money. But in today's economy...
      - I am a slave and work for $2 an hour. But in today's economy...
      - But in today's economy you have to accept everything and anything. Be a nice slave. Because... "in today's economy..."

      And the reason we have such a bad economy in the first place, IS that everybody is just playing along in the big fraud game where we are on the paying end.
      So your solution for losing everything, is to lose even more? Including the last bit of dignity you had left??

      Repeat after me: There is no such thing as a economic crisis!
      The money did not go *poof*. It went away from you, and in the pockets of others. There's always someone profiting from something like that.
      Money is worth less, but goods (like gold) aren't.
      Salaries are lower, compared to the prices of goods, but work is not worth less.
      The difference goes straight into the pockets of a few. It gets transformed to goods. So the difference grows even bigger.

      But it only works if you use their money. Their money that gets worth less and less compared to work and goods.
      So worth with goods instead, as much as possible. Don't play their game. You can only lose.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:A job is a job by selven · · Score: 1

      Technically, it is possible for everyone to lose out simultaneously without a few greedy people plundering anything. See: natural disasters, droughts, wars (they do benefit some people but the total harm is far greater), resource shortages.

    5. Re:A job is a job by Totenglocke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Try doing some research on economics before you speak next time.

      The rich tend to lose the most during recessions, due to most of their wealth being in stocks. That's why it has been shown many times throughout history that the wealth gap shrinks after recessions because stocks lose so much value and many people sell what they had instead of holding it because they are worried about losing ALL of the money in stocks.

      Secondly, as businesses lose money, they lay people off (or go bankrupt) which means less people have jobs and so on. When people stop having money coming in, they can't pay bills. When they can't pay bills (wait for it!) the person they owe money to loses money . That's why we're in this mess - people bought more than they could afford and then started defaulting on bills, due to the defaults companies laid people off, defaults increased - add to that people then being afraid to spend money due to fear of losing their job, and it spiraled to where we are now (though we are slowly recovering).

      All you did in your post was show a complete ignorance of Economics.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    6. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While a point could be made for trying to hire like-minded people, I cannot imagine a more interesting employer for a programmer than the military. Discriminating against someone for liking his job(or even just for wanting to have a job, maybe you didn't have any other option) is just stupid.
      If they had seen your Slashdot sig, now that'd be different ;p.
      Anyways, you are better off far away from them.
      Never mind that anything you code, even a porn website, or a free notepad clone, can be possibly used directly or indirectly to drop an H-bomb on Canberra.

    7. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perfect.

    8. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the flip side, the previous recession popularized the term "jobless recovery"; where the economy as a whole picked up again, yet people never quite got jobs as good as the ones they'd had before the layoffs (lower pay or fewer hours. or fewer benefits equating to net lower pay). In that case, by definition, since money was made but not by "us", the difference must have been additional money made by "them".

      If we're supposedly already in a recovery, yet the unemployment rate is still hovering around 10%, then it's happening again. It wasn't the rich who suffered most when the stocks tanked - half of a large fortune is still a large fortune; it was the middle class approaching retirement age who suffered. The rich basically got to ride this one out, their stocks are going to recover, and in the meantime many got to buy things on the cheap that are also going to shoot back up in value. If the economy is recovering but the jobs aren't coming back, there's no one else who could be making the difference in the total numbers other than the wealthy.

      And of course, they few that hit the timing just right - selling off stock at the top of the bubble, buying cheap property at the bottom of the crash - are the ones who've pretty much permanently got it made now. Their kids will be the trust fund fops running companies and running for elections in the next 10-30 years.

    9. Re:A job is a job by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      First, there was less money going around - not "we made less and someone else made more".

      Secondly, the job market always lags behind all other areas of the economy when going into a recovery. There will be jobs again, it just takes time to get back to where companies feel confident enough to hire / have enough business to justify hiring new people.

      As for your last bit, that only applies if they somehow had TONS of money invested and sold it ALL at the same time. If you had that much invested, you wouldn't be the type to sell it all at once. Also, your last bit just sums up your jealousy that some people have more money than you.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    10. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, the money actually did go *poof*. It wasn't real in the first place, hence the term *bubble*. Everything just became significantly less leveraged, which actually reduced the amount of available money that was propping up unsupportable housing prices.

      But, hey, in today's economy, who's really keeping score anyway?

    11. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could do with a little insight into economics as well.

      The reason we hit those high points when the economy is "up" is because of all the fictitious money being created, through loans, etc.

      When someone pays, say, 10k down on a 1000k mortgage, they get the loan and the property. Somebody gets paid 1000k for the property. The 1000k does not exist, it was created via some paperwork. So now, there is this big hunk of money that was created out of thin air being spent, etc. Now when the person who got the loan defaults, in a game of musical chairs - whoever was sitting on that loan hoping to collect payments loses "money." Rinse and repeat a few million times, and you have an economy going "up" for a while, when the money is being created out of thin air, then it spirals "down" because some of the gamblers who tried to make a percentage on that "money" got stuck with a losing hand.

      Its all a house of cards made of bullshit and news bites. Credit ratings and loans. Its how American capitalism works, and it is seriously flawed. The rich do not lose more than anybody else when things go "down" they simply lose some make believe money that didn't exist to begin with, stocks are NOT money. They are chips in a poker game. Just because some billionaire loses some chips in a poker game doesn't mean he no longer owns his yacht, mansion or fancy cars now does it? When people have their pay cut, they LOSE money. When some stock goes down a percentage, nobody loses money, the chips simply lose some POTENTIAL value, not actual value.

      Get a clue, and stop trying to be a middle class real estate speculator, the world will thank you for it.

    12. Re:A job is a job by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      Actually, the reason wages are down is because we let China and India bootstrap themselves into information economies by educating their students. Then they undercut our salaries by using the internet to compete in markets they couldn't otherwise reach. So due to competition, yes the work IS worth less. Sometimes the free market is a bitch, isn't it? Just like for the dairy farmers who have to slaughter their cows because milk prices are so low.

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
    13. Re:A job is a job by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Your failure to understand economics or finance makes me sad.....

      Go on Amazon, buy some Econ, banking, and stock market text books. Please. It'll make everyone happier, yourself included.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    14. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's jealousy to surmise that the powerful stay in power at the expense of the working man? Okay...

    15. Re:A job is a job by Totenglocke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rich does not necessarily equal "powerful". Yes, powerful politicians stay in power at the expense of everyone else, but that's not how it is with business owners.

      I know this will come as a shock to a collectivist who thinks that business owners are the enemy, but business owners create jobs. If Joe doesn't start his pizza company, there's no delivery boys, no waitresses, no cooks, no cashiers. Fact of life is that rich people are the ones creating jobs for most of the population.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    16. Re:A job is a job by wvmarle · · Score: 0

      Posting to undo mis-moderation... we really need a way to correct/undo a mod.

    17. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So because there was no pizza I decided to take what was left of my wage after buying noodles and put it in a big ole' heap and never use it? And I don't get this with "cut taxes for the rich instead of increasing welfare" I mean , do you really think that the guy on Welfare *won't* spend his money?

      He'll go to the movies, and he'll eat at Mickey D's , he'll even buy a flat screen TV for his rented apartment. Can someone explain for me why it's better for the economy to have low taxes then to have high welfare? Because I don't get it.

      (Ideological opinions don't need to go into this, I do understand that some people think it's more "fair" with lower taxes and others think it's more "fair" with high taxes and high welfare, what I'm trying to get at is the argument that we should have low taxes because it's better for the economy)

    18. Re:A job is a job by SQL+Error · · Score: 1

      Repeat after me: There is no such thing as a economic crisis!
      The money did not go *poof*. It went away from you, and in the pockets of others. There's always someone profiting from something like that.

      Wrong, wrong, wrongity wrong.

      It's not a zero-sum game. Everyone can win, but by the same token, everyone can lose.

      If I break a window, the asset value of that window is lost, no matter what economic "stimulus" there might appear to be from my having to pay for a new window.

      The money really did go *poof*. Money does that.

    19. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have nothing against the usual "reasonably"[1] law abiding businessman.

      What I dislike are those "professional" CEOs.

      There's a big difference between the CEOs who have built their company from nothing and those who just go around and "slash and burn" companies for their own profit. The latter destroy value and add little. The former create jobs and wealth for everyone in the long term. The latter don't.

      [1] Yeah we know they all cut corners from time to time. As long as it's closer to "hard-nosed business" and further from "amoral evil" it's not so bad.

    20. Re:A job is a job by arclyte · · Score: 1

      Praise Jesus for the rich people! Without them how would we ever survive?

    21. Re:A job is a job by tthomas48 · · Score: 1

      The rich tend to lose the most during recessions on paper, due to most of their wealth being in stocks.

      Taking out of account the fact that you think losing more = losing more total dollars, rather than losing a percentage of one's income. You seem to be stuck in the "averages tell me something useful" realm of economics 101.

      Regardless, this psychological shock to the very rich tends to make them do irrational things to try to prop up their paper worth such as firing employees at businesses that are doing just fine, thus causing the businesses to work poorly, and adding workers to the unemployment queue which in turn increases their payroll taxes, thus reducing the likelihood they'll hire in the near future. GM's a great example of a company finely run by economics 101 standards.

      Most of the rich are emotional apes of average intelligence just like the rest of us, who have gotten very, very lucky.

    22. Re:A job is a job by Aceticon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know this will come as a shock to a collectivist who thinks that business owners are the enemy, but business owners create jobs

      Actually it's entrepreneurs that create jobs.

      When they don't grow their business, business owners don't create jobs. At most they keep jobs since that keeps their business running (and often they destroy jobs when it's possible to replace the people with machines).

      The actual state of "owning a business" does nothing to improve society or increase employment. Growing a business (preferably from the ground-up) is what makes a difference.

      One needs to distinguish between those whose wealth is the product of their own efforts (typical example: Bill Gates) and those who inherited their wealth and made no effort to expand it (typical example: Paris Hilton).

      That said even entrepreneurs do not deserve our gratitude - they did it for themselves, just like we would do in their shoes. Some of them even deserve our contempt, such as those that got rich during the dot.com boom by creating companies with no business plan, selling them (to the suckers, which included plenty of pension funds and old ladies) for millions/billions after which said companies dully went bankrupt, often without having made a day of profit during their existence.

      I postulate that of the "contempt for wealth" that you sometimes observe here in /. comes from the observation that far too many individuals have gotten their wealth "as a gift" (inherited) or by deceit (no-future dot.com companies, CEOs getting fat bonuses for achieving targets of "not loosing too much money").

    23. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rich might have lost more actual money (or value to be more precise) but thats cause they had more in the first place. So much more that even after losing a larger proportion, they still have more left than the poor do. While the rich might lose their 2nd house or car - the poor cant afford to heat their home that winter.

      Try thinking about how wealth actually works before assuming you lost 'more' mate. The value of money isn't in the numbers.

      Oh and by the way - debtors are the first paid during bankruptcies - they almost always get their cash back due to asset sales and like. The poor schmoes that were fired after 30 years of loyal service, to try and keep the company afloat (the company now being 3 very well off merchant bankers) are the ones that have literally lost everything.

      All your post did was show a total ignorance of reality.

    24. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I postulate that of the "contempt for wealth" that you sometimes observe here in /. comes from the observation that far too many individuals have gotten their wealth "as a gift" (inherited) or by deceit (no-future dot.com companies, CEOs getting fat bonuses for achieving targets of "not loosing too much money").

      Spot on mate. Although it's not just the ones that were 'gifted' their money. Its the ones that pay less that min wage so they can shore up their own fortune - the ones that skimp on benefits/pensions so they once again shore up their own wealth at the expense of their workforces health. It's the ones that treat their workforce like an expendable resource that is their to be abused and then expect them to be fucking grateful because they 'created the jobs' in the first place - totally ignoring the fact that they need these jobs to be filled to make even one penny of their fortune. It's the ones that treat society and its inhabitants as their plaything, as a PR exercise to be exploited when they can and to be stuck back in the basement like sweat-shop slaves when there's any actual work to be done.

      The contempt exists for those that have contempt for the workers - the real backbone of society. The ones who without which nothing would exist, nothing would be built, nothing would be cleaned, nothing would be served. The ones who without which, the 'executives' would be sitting under trees saying 'wouldn't it be nice if we had...' waiting for somebody to hand them their whip.

      Seriously, its no wonder so much of the population turns to crime. We treat our basic workers worse than other countries treat their criminals.

    25. Re:A job is a job by EveLibertine · · Score: 1

      It's cute how you pretend to know what you're talking about.

    26. Re:A job is a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's ignorant? The rich are also the first to regain wealth as the economy recovers. Relatively speaking, they maintain their economic positions quite well.

    27. Re:A job is a job by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Very true. My wife handles loans for the not-quite-rich-but-thinks-they-are-rich crowd. It's just a non-stop stream of financial portfolios where people have $2,000,000 or more on paper but less than $50,000 in equity (and sometimes shockingly less). I'm sure individuals with certain political persuasions love to point out how these "small business owners" lost $1,950,000 in this recession.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  13. Why would it be? by AuMatar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Admittedly I've never worked with anyone from that industry, but that's more due to location (I don't live near Vegas). Depending on what you're doing, some skills will be useful and some won't. I don't see any reason why not to hire someone because they worked in gambling. For that matter I know a lot of programmers who play poker.

    I might stay away from internet gambling sites if you want to work in the US though- the US has arrested executives of them before. But it's not that gambling is a black mark, its that running an online gambling site is illegal, and they might decide to arrest you for helping to do so. The company that hired you is unlikely to care about that though.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    1. Re:Why would it be? by MosesJones · · Score: 1

      its that running an online gambling site is illegal,

      No it isn't. What is "illegal" is allowing America citizens to gamble on-line. Online gambling is completely legal in most countries and indeed the WTO found that the US laws regarding online gambling (i.e. attacking companies hosted and managed abroad) were in fact illegal. Its pretty amazing how the "land of the free" tries to dictate what people in other countries should do when if the tables were reversed (there are several US hosted sites that do things that are illegal in the EU for instance) the "freedom of speech" line is rolled out (how that applies to online pharmacies I'm not sure though).

      Now what I'd say is that if you want to work in the Valley or in the financial industry on the East coast then working for a top online gambling site or other gambling company is going to be a positive thing for your career. If however you want to work in the middle of the US on SAP systems then its not going to help.

      But please lets not role out that "online gambling is illegal" its as illegal in the UK as selling beer to an 18 year old.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    2. Re:Why would it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NB The poster is referring to UK based online gambling sites, not US Vegas type casinos. There is a difference.

      Vegas can have positive connotations - weekend with friends on the piss, bright lights, cheese, spend $25 on slots/tables over 3 days, marry a hooker etc... 90% of the attendees are there purely for the experience. Even if the target audience are gambling junkies.

      Connotations attached to UK PartyPorker type sites are almost solely negative - Guy sulking downstairs at four in the morning while wife is asleep, literally betting the house and home.

    3. Re:Why would it be? by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      And I was speaking to someone who specifically mentioned possibly wanting to come to the US in the future. It's illegal *here* to run one, and UK executives on vacation in America have been arrested.

      Hey, you're talking to someone who plays on Stars and used to use Party. I like online gambling, I think the illegality here is stupid. But I wouldn't work for an online casino if you ever wanted to go to the US, I would not put it past the feds to arrest him for conspiracy.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  14. Any different than Insurance/Actuarials? by ThreeGigs · · Score: 1

    Seriously, how is programming for gambling all that much different than programming for insurance or actuarial purposes?

    Bet a dollar, bet your health, bet your life... it's all in the odds, no?

    1. Re:Any different than Insurance/Actuarials? by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      Because everybody dies, car insurance is de-facto required by law to have (if you have a car), but gambling is neither.
      A better comparison of gambling with a more positive connotation would be: Wall Street, and venture capitalism.

    2. Re:Any different than Insurance/Actuarials? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Insurance is not about gambling, despite the facts that the mechanics of it are similar. The purpose of insurance is to make a small payment to cover an unlikely, but expensive catastrophe. And in any case, it's hardly the point: the people who are going to deny you a job because you worked in the gambling industry do ot really operate on this level.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  15. Big NO by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 5, Informative

    My first job after college was in the gaming industry. It has NOT been a black mark on my record, in fact, quite the opposite, it led to my next three jobs and was a factor in the fourth and fifth because another programmer from the same company was also contracting there at the time.

    What it did do, though, was set the start of a pattern for me that I've been unable to escape: 1 to 2 year positions at small companies contracting. I suspect that if you're going to work for Bally Midway or some other such big slot machine company, that wouldn't be a problem- but table gaming software even 10 years after the .com I first worked for is still very much in it's infancy, we're not about to replace dealers with robots and just about tech you put into the pit is going to be somewhat hackable or vulnerable to everything from card counting to spilled alcoholic drinks they insist on comping the players with to keep them playing, so it's kind of a tough business to get into. I'm glad I escaped.

    Having said that- in this economy a RCG can't pick and choose- you MUST take the first thing that comes along- so go ahead and go for it. Vegas may be the suicide capitol of the US, but it isn't the worst place you could end up living.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    1. Re:Big NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! Damn right you would hire someone working for the sex industry. I tell you something guys: I worked for the sex industry and you will not get rid of the moral questions involved. Every day you are confronted with ugly content and dirty stuff, and best of all you cannot even tell someone WHAT exactly you are working. I would never ever make that move again. Its st least as immoral as gambling. People get addicted to sex as they get to gamling, there is no difference in it.

      To all those sex-businesses out there: You all have some nice portal an nice blogfarms and nice cutting edge SEO and nice partnerprograms and all the like. But you know what, I would not recommend any one having at least some braincells thinking straight to your industry.

      The gambling or sex industry are low hanging fruits. Sure they want to hire, because they have such a braindead business, that some capable people can make a difference. I would never ever do it again, it will even by chance ruin your sexlife if you had one.

      There are many problems out there searching for a nice solution. DO NOT FIX WHAT's NOT BROKEN: NO SEX INDUSTRY, NO GAMBLING!

    2. Re:Big NO by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Vegas may be the suicide capitol of the US, but it isn't the worst place you could end up living.

      Maybe not the worst, but it's pretty damn close...

      --
      +1 Disagree
    3. Re:Big NO by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      What a lie. Of course you can pic and choose. But you need a high feeling of self-value, and make them believe in it. Basice sales knowledge.

      And stop using that "in this economy" shit. There is no crisis. There is no problem. It's only in our heads. It only works as long as you play it. So don't play it.
      There are tons of booming industries. Even if it's just the fraudulent industry of pulling off money from governments and people through creating a "crisis" that does not affect oneself.
      Someone is always profiting. That one always has big money to spend. And someone always gets that big money.
      BE. THAT. ONE.

      The rest is sales and working on you connections.

      I have no fear of any "recession" anymore. I see a situation. That situation is neither good nor bad. It just is what it is. I simply make the best out of it. And I fight harder than anyone else.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:Big NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The capitol is in Washington DC, l2spell.

    5. Re:Big NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wish they'd replace dealers with robots. dealers are dicks. when i play blackjack, i always end up with some snooty-ass dealer who looks at me like an idiot any time i get a losing hand. i'm like "hey guy if you're so good at blackjack then why are you dealing?"

      give me video blackjack any day

    6. Re:Big NO by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      ...because I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and dog gone it, people like me!

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    7. Re:Big NO by MacWiz · · Score: 1

      It's not just Vegas, Reno and Atlantic City. Every Native American Indian tribe in the country has the right to open casinos and judging from the states I've been in recently, it's happening everywhere. Every one of them is loaded with slots and table games. And none of them are run by anyone named Guido.

  16. It sounds like hyperbole or jealousy by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    [quote]a software developer position in a company that supplies software to the gambling and betting industry[/quote] Seems to me that the worst thing that could happen is you work for a company called "We hire unreliable louts" or maybe "Bad gambles, Inc". As you probably can predetermine this, you shouldn't worry about anything that your instincts don't already clue you in on. Your friends are probably just narrow minded or jealous. Just make sure that your official job title doesn't hint at bookmaking, card dealing, or something called 'fluffing' and you will be OK.

  17. Yes and No by Reason58 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anything can be a black mark if the person hiring dislikes it. There is nothing particularly unique about gambling.

  18. Now I'm really confused by abbynormal+brain · · Score: 0

    Based on this answer of "yes", I would be under the impression that ANY software development company would be overjoyed to hire you ...given that the qualifications are "screwing money out of stupid, statistically illiterate and not entirely mentally stable people".

    Speaking of which ... I have to go and pick up my copy of Windows Vista.

    --
    L'esperienza de questa dolce vita (The experience of this sweet life) - Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy
  19. Mark on what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps this is a quaint notion, but: I'd be more concerned with the black mark on my soul.

    That word should mean something to you, regardless of whether you're a materialist physicalist skeptical rationalist naturalistic realistic reductionist scientific atheist or otherwise.

  20. Maybe. by chrb · · Score: 1, Informative

    British, working in the gambling industry, and possibly wanting to visit the US in the future? Why don't you ask David Carruthers, Gary Kaplan how that worked out for them?

    (To be fair, they were the guys at the top and I haven't heard of any lower level staff being arrested, but still, I doubt US immigration would look too kindly on it if you ever were to apply for a green card.)

    1. Re:Maybe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they offered Internet gambling in the US, where it is illegal? And then at least one of them has the poor sense to enter the country whos laws he is currently violating? Stupid, stupid, stupid.

      If I set up an Internet-based gun store to sell guns (which is not only legal but protected by the Constitution of the United States) and began selling handguns (or rifles/shotguns to the non-upper class) in the UK, you better believe that the UK authorities would attempt to have me extradited. Hell, UK courts currently have no problem levying completely absurd fines for libel cases (which have made the UK judiciary the laughing stock of the entire world) for cases in which neither the plaintiff nor the defendant are residents or subjects of the UK. You've made things so bad that several States have passed laws guaranteeing immunity to UK libel suits for its citizens. Perhaps the UK could pursue such a solution in this case?

    2. Re:Maybe. by chrb · · Score: 1

      And then at least one of them has the poor sense to enter the country whos laws he is currently violating? Stupid, stupid, stupid.

      As far as I recall, his flight was refuelling in the US and at some point it became mandatory for all passengers to "enter" the US before they could reboard the plane, there's an amusing anecdote about that here.

      If I set up an Internet-based gun store to sell guns (which is not only legal but protected by the Constitution of the United States) and began selling handguns (or rifles/shotguns to the non-upper class) in the UK, you better believe that the UK authorities would attempt to have me extradited.

      Bad analogy. I'm pretty sure you'd be arrested for various offences in the US first. Gun sales are regulated within the US - the 2nd Amendment doesn't give you the right to sell guns to just anyone, plus isn't it illegal to sell firearms online (except to licensed dealers)? And also illegal to ship weapons and munitions to other nations without an export license?

      A better analogy would be the UK trying to extradite a US citizen for posting literature on the internet which violates some UK laws but which would be covered by the 1st Amendment in the US. Obviously a US court would not allow an extradition, because the activity is legal in the US. Or how about another analogy, where the US government would request extradition of porn web site operators in Holland, where the legal age for porn is 16? I doubt the Dutch government would extradite its own citizens for this activity which is legal in their own nation.

  21. Get some new friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've interviewed many applicants for software engineering positions, and several have had previous positions developing software for gaming machines. I actually see this as a good thing, because those developers are often more suitable as they have better coding habits and are more aware of solid, robust programming practices due to the stringent requirements placed on gaming machines.

    Get some new friends. Those friends obviously don't want you to get a job that may elevate you above them.

  22. No personal experience, just an opinion by AdamInParadise · · Score: 1

    If you worked for an "established" company, i.e. a brick&mortar casino or a maker of slot machines, it should not be a problem. I'm sure that the gambling industry faces lots of interesting challenges (i.e. random number generation, security, following regulations...) Now, if you worked in the shadier side of the industry (online "casinos", "yOu already W0N 1ooo dollrs" emails and the like), well, that could be a problem with many potential employers.

    --
    Nobox: Only simple products.
  23. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You will be earning money from other people's suffering

    But...do you know what would happen if all the casinos in America closed their doors? Their clients would open their own gambling clubs.

    People want to gamble. Its not like the casinos force the people through the door or anything. The demand for the service (however stupid it may be) is very high.

    In fact, if you try to force people to stop gambling, they just break the law and do it illegally. They want to gamble that badly.

    So I think you are wrong in blaming the player's desires on those who provide the games. They are just responding to market forces, like everyone else does.

    I might see why it would be wrong to "push" gambling on to people. But simply providing a place really isn't evil.

  24. Fantasy boss much? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Doing it for long or doing it often is not a sign of a person I want on my team.

    He wouldn't fit on your team anyway. Unless he's a cuddly toy, a Star Wars figurine or an inflatable woman.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  25. It's all in how you present it! by wdhowellsr · · Score: 1

    I've learned over the years that you may have to take jobs that aren't the most socially redeeming as you would hope. The trick is to make sure your resume is written so as to downplay the company versus the actual coding. As an example you could say that you had work on statistical analysis of number sequences.

    That being said I was offered a job that was described as high volume video streaming over the web. When I showed up it was a porn video streaming company with multiple cubicles each with it's own actor performing for the camera. Needless to say I decided to turn them down.

    1. Re:It's all in how you present it! by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. I would have preferred an open office over all of those cubicles myself.

  26. I doubt it would be a problem by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    I'm a manager in an engineering firm (think the pointy-haired boss, but less clueless) - although we don't do software development, we occasionally have the need for code analysts. I think it's highly unlikely that experience with a gambling firm would be disqualifying. If you know your stuff, you should be good to go. Just list the official company name (which probably doesn't scream "we do gambling") on your resume, and focus on the technology you actually use and are familiar with. You should be fine.

  27. Hell yes it is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When we hire we look for web application development experience, database experience etc., if you're coming in from a gaming dev. background we might assume you can program, but we definitely assume you will need 9-18 months in the position until your developing at the same speed as the rest of us because you lack familiarity with the common problems and APIs. So when we secure a work contract with a client and need people to start ASAP, we need people who are already skilled up in the same problem domain.

    But there's something else too, how interesting is an ex gaming programmer going to find working on boring business apps? Do we really want to take the risk on hiring them when they haven't yet proven they can handle the tedium of business apps?

  28. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work in the Gaming Industry in Nevada. Its not a black-mark on your resume from any societal/value thing.

    In Nevada. If you were to move elsewhere, though, you might be surprised.

    (Might be. I personally don't know... I just think that perspectives might be a bit skewed in Nevada due to Vegas).

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  29. not for me by obi1one · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked in the gaming industry, and didnt have any problem getting work afterward. My next employer was pleased that I had worked in a highly regulated industry where if our new code caused downtime, we had to explain to a state gaming board about how it happened.

    1. Re:not for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also currently work in the gaming industry, for Bally Technologies, in the Embedded Technologies group.
      We are working with a modern microprocessor, very close to the hardware. Also we are working on a very modern (non-Linux, non-Windows) micro-kernel. The application is communications-intensive, and needs to be provably correct code. (The code is frequently audited by the regulators). There are complicated OS issues. Interesting device interfaces. Complicated application code that deals with gaming, electronic funds transfer, database communications, and using various encryption technologies.

      I've worked in embedded systems for almost 30 years, having done 10 silicon valley startups in the past.
      This is among the most challenging engineering problems I have had, during my 30-year career.

      I am the happiest I've been in about 10 years.

  30. Depends how you put it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's rephrase this. You are considering working on web-based financial applications in a highly regulated sector. I'll give you a quick guess at the ratio of people with those skills that are needed vs available.

  31. One word by NoYob · · Score: 1
    Vegas may be the suicide capitol of the US, but it isn't the worst place you could end up living.

    Showgirls.

    Oh, to be a young college grad working in Vegas!

    And prostitution is legal!

    --
    It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    1. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in Vegas. But in the rural areas of Nevada, yes.

    2. Re:One word by Libertarian001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Prostitution is not legal in Las Vegas, which is in Clark county. It is, however, legal eight of the state's more rural counties.

  32. I rather doubt it by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Whether it is porn or gambling or some other vice, there will be foes of course, but it shouldn't be difficult to deflect any negative questioning with remarks to the effect of the reason you exited the industry being conscience related.

    I once worked for a free news publication with a great deal of "adult services" advertising and was asked about that. I simply said that it was a bit of a surprise, a shock and was distasteful at times, but eventually I found other work and exited the business. That seemed to answer the question sufficiently, but who knows for sure... the point is that I was indeed asked about my connection with a morally questionable business.

    1. Re:I rather doubt it by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that 'I found it objectionable' might work if you only worked for a company a year or two. If you try that and you worked for the company for 5 or 7 years, I'm gonna think your less than honest. Although, in the first place, I wouldn't have any problem with someone programming in the gambling industry. If anything, I know that gambling software must be *correct* because it is a highly regulated industry. Anyhow, it's a legal business, so why should it be a black mark?

      However, some people will have a problem with it, but, I don't think *enough* people will consider it a black mark against you, to worry about (at least in the U.S., dunno about anywhere else). I figure, if someone has a problem with it, you probably are better off not working for them anyhow. I don't think it'd be a problem at any relatively large (or even medium size company), as those companies are generally so 'corporate' that it really won't matter. The only place it might matter is for a very small, entirely privately owned company where the owner has a rigid moral code.

      You could always say that gambling is a core tenet of your religion, and sue them for religious discrimination. *grin*

    2. Re:I rather doubt it by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I tend to favor matters of doubt in the other direction. I once questioned a person who was invited to return to work building military weapons. They are used for the purposes of killing people and destroying things. They are used to intimidate people both foreign and domestic. The will of a few are pushed onto the world through the use of these things. I asked him how he felt about working for such a thing. "I'm okay with it" was his response. I get only the sickest of feelings about working for that industry. On the other hand, adult industry advertising makes me less sick... sometimes it's rather amusing -- all the different sorts of people you run into and all. The gambling industry? I have my doubts but it is generally just as harmful to the weak as other vices. Make no mistake about it -- addicted people are harmed by all of these industries and it is their mental and emotional weaknesses that are being exploited by these industries.

      There are a lot of things that are wrong with the world and humanity in particular. Contributing to the problem by supporting and assisting these industries just makes you one of them... or worse, someone who helps them and being used by them.

      I'm atheist. I have no religious objections to all of that. I do have issues with taking advantage of the weaknesses of others for personal gain.

    3. Re:I rather doubt it by PRMan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm atheist...I do have issues with taking advantage of the weaknesses of others for personal gain.

      Survival of the fittest?!? I guess even atheists can be hypocrites. Who knew?

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:I rather doubt it by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      I do have issues with taking advantage of the weaknesses of others for personal gain.

      Good luck competing with your manager.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    5. Re:I rather doubt it by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Atheist does not mean someone is incapable of caring about others or even being kind. The worst people in history claim to be religious. Some of the worst people you probably know claim to be Christians. You should learn more about what you don't understand. It is precisely because I don't believe in a higher being that I realize that we are all we have and if we are harming others, we are certainly hurting the development of humanity.

    6. Re:I rather doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because one is atheist doesn't mean one has to be a social darwinist. There isn't any One True Way to not believe in a deity. Personally, my atheism takes the form of existentialism: I don't believe there is a god who sets a purpose for our lives, which means that it's up to each of us to find our own sense of purpose and meaning. For me, it's making the world a better place than it would be without me... because doing that makes me happy. "Do as you will, as long as it harms no one", is another rather popular philosophy among atheists, which is also not based on social darwinism.

    7. Re:I rather doubt it by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Actually, the worst people of the 20th century were Stalin, Mao and Hitler. Stalin and Mao were devout atheists and Hitler (contrary to his speeches which told his listeners what they wanted to hear) followed a Eugenics doctrine which believed devoutly in survival of the fittest.

      So, no, actually the 3 worst people I know were atheists. Thanks for playing, though.

      And it would seem that the person in need of learning what they don't understand isn't me.

      That being said, I realize that some atheists are certainly capable of caring about others, and some so-called Christians are bad people, but that's not the way to bet.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  33. I don't think so by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, anecdotal evidence but I do live in Vegas and I worked in a non gaming software company here with people who previously worked for gaming companies and moved on to other jobs without any problems. One of them works for a major military contractor right now, after working for IGT (who makes most of Vegas slot machines) for years. So I don't think it's a problem. I guess it depends on the details. If your job offer is from one of the offshore poker sites or other sites illegal in the USA, it might be a different story.

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  34. Not for me... by chriskenrick · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's never been an issue for me, and out of my approximately 15 years in IT, I've spent about 10 of them working for gaming or wagering companies. If anything, gaming or wagering companies seem to prefer people with experience in that industry, so in effect you are probably creating more opportunities for yourself down the track rather than less.

    Oh, and if you're getting into a highly regulated area such as slots or table games, you'll find that you'll have no choice but to gain skills in careful attention to detail in areas like version control, configuration management, hardware control, and security. That sort of rigour in those important things will serve you well no matter what your next role.

  35. No - you'll be fine. by Count+Sessine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm in the gaming industry, and I've interviewed and worked with plenty of people who started out writing gambling software. I wouldn't have any problem hiring someone out of that field, and neither would my colleagues and coworkers. Now, outside of gaming in general, in the world or grown-up software? Not sure about that...

  36. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by El+Torico · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, its a boring, crappy, narrow-minded industry. get out now and do something more interesting

    You've just described about 90% of all jobs.

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
  37. The Value Proposition by Dr_Harm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We seem to get a lot of these sorts of questions at /. -- and as someone who interviews and makes hiring decisions, let me tell you about the number one factor for making the call:

    The Value Proposition

    At the end of the day, what I'm doing is entering into an agreement where I give you money (and things that cost money, ie. benefits), and you give me your labor. Your skills and experience and a few other factors (ie. culture fit) alter your "productivity", or how much "labor" I get for my money. In other words, I am spending my money on you, and I want to make sure I get good "value" for that money.

    As such, I really don't particularly care who you worked for in the past, unless it can be used as some predictor of future performance. I do care about the skills and experience you have picked up along the way, your personality, your thought-process, etc.

    Occasionally, very occasionally, the "where you used to work" question does become relevant. If your last job was for a blood-relative, that is going to be a yellow-flag that needs further investigation and verification. That's probably the most common scenario where it comes into play.

  38. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a really really good chance that the OP doesn't work in Vegas. I know plenty of people that worked for IGT Reno, or SDG and did gaming work most of which was never slated for release in Nevada. I would agree that regardless of where your gambling software is going to be used, it's still very narrow minded industry.

  39. Good Mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in michigan and if you have a job to place on a resume its a good sign. At this point in michigan I think they'll accept drug dealer as relevant job experience

  40. Maybe... by EkriirkE · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is your next employer(s) a highly religious zealot? If so, yes, be concerned. And not just because they might frown down on your heathenish past!

    Otherwise, why would you ever think it to be bad? They have high security and confidentiality concerns, what employer would see your experience and involvement with a high-security job as a bad thing?

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    1. Re:Maybe... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

      Is your next employer(s) a highly religious zealot?

      So it is a bad thing now to enforce (do as I do not as I say-type thing) what you truly believe in? I guess as long as what you believe in stems from what someone else believes in and if there is a deity involved then it must be considered zealotry.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    2. Re:Maybe... by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

      To (en)force it upon others, sure. Who said anything about a deity? Lots of assumptions going on here...

      --
      from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
      to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    3. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Applying a test in employment based solely on your religious beliefs in is a "bad thing" in the eyes of the law. Sorry.

  41. Take what you can get by kroby · · Score: 1

    IGT in Reno Nevada was one of the top recruiters for hardware and software engineers at my university. There is nothing wrong with working for them, but most graduating students had a bit of a stigma against it just because it was everybody's fallback plan. That, and working there is like a college reunion when half their employees are from the same school. I think the bottom line is, if it is the best offer you have then you should take it. Fresh graduates do not usually have the luxury to pick and choose their first job; you need experience before you can do that.

  42. Allow me to educate you about Vegas by Xaedalus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Showgirls.

    If they're not Real Estate Agents/Mortgage Brokers/Daytime Call Girls, they're vampires. You never EVER see them during the day, they pancake on the make-up with a trowel for good reason, and most of them are either taken by large burly boyfriends, or not interested in anything with a Y chromosome.

    Oh, to be a young college grad working in Vegas!

    Been there, done that. Fought in the dating wars in Vegas from '01-'06. And the only way you ever got lucky was if you had money (to buy girls with), or were a "Vegas Boy", meaning you had no body fat, perfect abs, perfect tan, perfect teeth, perfect hair, wore polo shirts and khaki shorts, and generally sported more bling than most girls do. Oh, and driving a hot car. Just remember, Vegas is one of the few places left in the US where you don't have to have a high school degree to make 40K a year. Lotsa dim, good-looking young boys and girls come to Vegas to party, work crap jobs and make lots of money, which they then promptly spend on partying, and repeat.

    And prostitution is legal!

    Now this is a valid point. But prostitution is only legal in certain sections of the county, and not in Clark County. So you'd have to drive an hour northwest to Pahrump, where the brothels are at. This is what the smart guys do. Prostitution is NOT legal in Vegas itself, and Vegas Metro's Vice division has lots of fun arresting stupid young dicks trying to pick some tail up when they could have driven an hour away and had lots of tail for the same amount of cash LEGALLY. And then there's the stories of all the scams and robberies perpetrated... Oh yes, loads of fun. Couldn't leave there fast enough.

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    1. Re:Allow me to educate you about Vegas by El+Torico · · Score: 2, Informative

      A friend of mine once described Las Vegas as "Grotesquely American".

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    2. Re:Allow me to educate you about Vegas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We've been looking for the american dream, and now that we're right here in the main vortex - you wanna quit!?"

  43. Try this ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine yourself, some day in the future, working at the company of your dreams. You're talking with your new colleagues, and one asks you, "So where did you work?" You tell them: "I worked for ." If I felt that the work was honest and that the company wasn't corrupt, I don't see why I would feel ashamed telling them this. So, in my opinion, you'll probably be fine.

    It would be different, I think, if you had worked at a porn company, but that's just my general feeling.

  44. Black Mark by hardihoot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I say go for it. You could end up in Atlantic City, New Jersey in one of Donald Trump's hotels. You would be New York City and Washington DC about 3 hours away. The cultural experience would be quite remarkable I think. Then again, you might end up on a riverboat on the Mississippi river having to work in a cramped cubicle below the waterline.

    --
    A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in pictures of silver --Proverbs 25:11
  45. great experience by sohp · · Score: 4, Funny

    The way banks and other financial services companies operate these days, working in gambling would be a GREAT introduction to the world of credit default swaps and mortgage-backed securities. Next stop: WALL STREET!

    1. Re:great experience by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nah, oranges and apples here: the gaming is much more tightly regulated.

    2. Re:great experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post was marked "funny" but what you say is true. I work in Financial IT for a major international bank and in these parts, experience in the gambling industry is definitely seen as a plus.

    3. Re:great experience by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      The way banks and other financial services companies operate these days, working in gambling would be a GREAT introduction to the world of credit default swaps and mortgage-backed securities.

      No. Gambling companies know what they are doing, have the math to back up that claim, and they know that they will win.

    4. Re:great experience by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Nah, oranges and apples here: the gaming is much more tightly regulated.

      You my friend win today's prize for the saddest fact posted on Slashdot.

    5. Re:great experience by sohp · · Score: 1

      +1 Informative, accurate, and funny because it's true.

  46. Who cares about a black mark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You never have to work again... write in a special "hit the jackpot" sequence, visit all your customers' casinos over a weekend, and skip the country. Oh, and your friends are idiots.

  47. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

    I work in the Gaming Industry in Nevada. Its not a black-mark on your resume from any societal/value thing. However, its a boring, crappy, narrow-minded industry. get out now and do something more interesting.

    "These are tough times. Hard to find yourself work. A man can get a job, he might not look too close at what that job is."

    (Firefly quote, but I remember it applying to me once before)

  48. I'll go with the other hiring managers here. by wonderboss · · Score: 1

    I don't care much about what business previous employers are in, unless it is very similar to mine. I care if your knowledge and experience are relevant to my business. I would also like the idea of your previous employer being very serious about reliability.

    --
    more cowbell
  49. Anything but telemarketing is kind-of ok :-) by moz25 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see experience with a gambling site to be an instant disqualifier. Maybe if that's the only kind of site you were involved in it would be, but if it's one of various projects, it shouldn't be big deal.

    The only time a resume gets thrown into the trashcan right away is if I see "telemarketing" in any fashion that doesn't involve stopping them or hunting them down. It's something you try to hide, not something to put on your resume. I want someone with some brains.

    Also, as an aside: try to avoid going into detail about any activities that are trivial compared to the job you're applying for. Some people seem to think that if they have a 10 page resume padded with irrelevant history, they'll look better. Nope, doesn't work.

    1. Re:Anything but telemarketing is kind-of ok :-) by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      My first job out of college was writing scripting systems for telemarketer boiler rooms.

      It just dialed, put up text for the operator, collected responses into a database and went to the next page based on responses.

      Butt simple and boring, even back in 286 days.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    2. Re:Anything but telemarketing is kind-of ok :-) by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      The only time a resume gets thrown into the trashcan right away is if I see "telemarketing" in any fashion that doesn't involve stopping them or hunting them down. It's something you try to hide, not something to put on your resume. I want someone with some brains.

      That is an awfully poor assumption to make about someone. Automatically discounting someone based upon your own personal bias is a great way to overlook someone with talent. This is something the PHB would do. I wouldn't be proud of posting something that makes you seem somewhat shallow. I worked for a telemarketing company and I became an expert, literally overnight with Cisco VoIP telephony and LAN/WAN telecommunications products. I would argue that my experience was good. The company I worked for did not behave shadily, I was only laid off after an economic downturn back in 2007. I would go back in a heartbeat.

    3. Re:Anything but telemarketing is kind-of ok :-) by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually my buddy works in IT in telemarketing, specifically supporting charitable organizations. His job is to maximize hit rates and avoid calling people like you and me at all costs. He actually deals with some challenging IT projects on a daily basis like merges between multiple hundred(s) of million row tables, data validation, historical lookbacks (who and what patterns of people donated in the past), localization (find one gatherer per neighborhood who uses their time to bring in more donations), etc. Trust me neither he, his company, nor their clients want YOU to be called.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Anything but telemarketing is kind-of ok :-) by moz25 · · Score: 1

      So why are you bothering me then?

      I don't want to deal with (former) telemarketers in any capacity and your "buddy" apparently doesn't want to deal with me.

      Works for me :-)

    5. Re:Anything but telemarketing is kind-of ok :-) by moz25 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Talent is not in short supply, ethics are. Given that you dismiss my resentment of one of *the* most annoying activities as mere "personal bias" shows that you have neither.

    6. Re:Anything but telemarketing is kind-of ok :-) by moz25 · · Score: 1

      And if you're smart, this information will not be found on your resume for both reasons I outlined in my post.

      If you see nothing wrong with sharing that kind of information, then you just made the job of the reviewer a lot easier :-)

    7. Re:Anything but telemarketing is kind-of ok :-) by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Not on my resume simply because it's so ancient that none of the technologies are remotely relevant.

      RCG don't have many choices.

      I got a second better job with that on my resume. etc

      Because I wrote code used for evil, prospective bosses know I can be bought.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:Anything but telemarketing is kind-of ok :-) by moz25 · · Score: 1

      Good way to turn a negative into a positive :-)

  50. Don't Worry too much about it by Tuzanor · · Score: 4, Informative

    As somebody who DID work as a systems administrator for a publicly traded, Canadian based company that supplies software to the online gambling industry I can say that unless you're an executive it will have no bearing on your future employment any more than working for an 'evil' defence contractor or such will. Sure, you'd have a hard time getting a job at amnesty international after working for BEA, but the experience you'll get will open more doors elsewhere. The company had far more trouble hiring people who were willing to work for the company, in fact. Though in Canada 'online gambling' had a much more negative connotation than it does in England, where betting shops are everywhere.

    The experience I got was very worthwhile. I got to travel to interesting locations to setup the servers. Places like Curacao in the Caribbean, Malta, Ireland, the netherlands (we did work for the government casinos there, in fact), etc. I started out in a very jr position, but moved up extremely quickly because I was capable and they had a hard time finding good people who were willing to work for them. This gave me Sr-level quality within 2 years. I've since moved on, but I would do it again in a second. It's not been a black mark on me at all and people are usually curious about it. Because of complex legal and national regulations, the accountants also were in a similar position. They had a lot of trouble getting quality accountants, so they had to get more Jr. ones who moved up fast.

    The executives had far more trouble after leaving, though they also ran the company rather poorly. In fact I'd say that the worst part was having to work with/for some people that I would consider less than high caliber. Because of this, I became the go-to guy to fix poor decisions made from incompetence at the CTO and director level.

    1. Re:Don't Worry too much about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, Canadian based, and supplying software to the online gambling industry? Would that industry include Pokerstars? I hear they get their software from Canada :-D

    2. Re:Don't Worry too much about it by covertbadger · · Score: 1

      Cryptologic, by any chance? Just curious. I agree with you, incidentally - I have significant experience working for a large, legal, and extremely successful betting operation, and our biggest problem with staff retention is the fact that investment banks keep poaching our developers.

  51. Troll? by chrb · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Please explain, how is it trolling to point out that several British men (there have been others, e.g. Peter Dicks) were are/were involved in the online gambling industry - activities which are completely legal in the UK - have been arrested and prosecuted by US authorities? There is no legal guarantee that being based in the UK would make you immune to prosecution in the US, and now it seems that the British government are happy to extradite citizens to the US for actions that aren't actually a crime in the UK (e.g. Ian Norris of Morgan Crucible).

  52. I never noticed any stigma attached. by Psyko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Having spent close to 10 years working in Gaming Systems (back end accounting, marketing & reporting systems, real time concurrent data collection for 4-5k+ nodes), I don't think there's really a stigma attached at least here in the us. I've never worked at casino property directly though, staying more with the companies that provide them software/hardware.

    I've worked as an FTE and as a contractor for a couple of the larger international players in the space and I think overall it was good experience, casino marketing can be a moral issue for you as you're essentially trying to get people to give you their money praying on their hopes that they can get something for nothing, but that's how all gambling works.

    I've since moved out of that industry, from there to direct marketing & data mining/warehousing from there into ecommerce focused, and now onto commercial services (printing, transaction management etc).

    I saw a couple people point out travel, depending on what your specific role is and who you're working for you can pretty much end up anywhere. Just in North America, from Indian gaming, to Riverboat gaming & established "legalized gaming zones (ie. Vegas, AC etc) and state run (Winnipeg/Quebec/Sudbury) you could end up all over the continent, then internationally there's large markets in europe, asia, australia, even south africa.

    I say go for it. You'll learn some things and collect a check, just like any other job.

    --
    01:36AM up 426 days, 2:46, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.11, 0.05
  53. What you *do* or where you do it by yurtinus · · Score: 1

    While different companies may look differently on resumes, gambling related jobs aren't really respected any more or less than any other profession. IGT is based in my town, and nobody cares as much about the name of the company as the experience there -- actually the software guys I know at IGT are well enough respected among their peers. Experience in IT is still experience in IT. Embedded programming is the same for a slot machine as it is for a kiosk or microwave oven (though with *much* more process and regulation).

    You may run into biased recruiters who object to you working at a gaming company, but there are biases against damn near every industry out there (webmaster selling alcohol, system engineer building cigarette rolling machines, etcetc). All in all, it's better to get *some* experience in a potentially objectionable industry than none at all. If you're working with gaming machines you'll come out with good embedded systems knowledge. For a gaming website (or pretty much any IT related gaming job) you'll get a pretty decent security background (or so I imagine). Most important for any of these however is you'll get experience dealing with a regulated industry which will have its own processes and assorted red tape. This can be great if you move to other regulated industries down the road (banking, defense).

    Nobody can say for certain that *any* job won't effect you later on. There are pitfalls in any industry, shady companies and fly by night operations are everywhere. Be smart and do some research into the company that is hiring you regardless of what they build. If it's not something you object to, you are probably OK. Most folks don't consider gambling something especially terrible.

    --
    +1 Disagree
  54. Black mark? Pffft. by Angst+Badger · · Score: 3, Funny

    I haven't worked in the gambling industry myself, but based on what I've read about its extreme computing requirements, I'd be very interested in seeing a resume from someone who had worked in it. The same goes for parts of the online porn industry for much the same reason. Both are very technically challenging environments and are often leaders in innovation. Their achievements aren't lauded as much as they might be if the subject matter wasn't so unseemly in the minds of many, but at the end of the day, data is data.

    I'd recommend going for it. Even at its worst, it's nowhere near as disreputable as, let's say, being on the development team for MS Access.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:Black mark? Pffft. by mmandt · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wouldn't exactly call it a black mark either. However, I believe software engineers have an ethical responsibility to adhere to regarding who they work for and what type of work they are willing to do. For example, I once refused to have my resume submitted to Equifax. They are not a bad company, but in my experience. However, they are the type of company that would push me to violate the privacy of individuals. While I probably wouldn't be asked to break laws, that doesn't mean I have to be happy or comfortable about the creative ways that they wish to collect data. A gambling company falls into the same genre for me. They are going to ask you to manipulate the end user, make them feel like they are about to win, or make them feel like they have accomplished something outside of losing their money... that kind of stuff. You have to ask yourself if you are ok with doing that and frankly, if that's the type of contribution to society you want to make.

  55. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    This sounds like most jobs, in most industries. Face it, not that many jobs are really all that interesting. Software development makes a good career for me personally because it's a lot more fun than cleaning toilets or writing TPS reports and pays pretty well. But it's not that often I get to work on something really interesting to me, though I've definitely put a lot of work into maneuvering my career so I get to work with technologies I prefer and find interesting (i.e. Linux), even if the end application isn't all that interesting.

    If I want to do something genuinely interesting, I do it on my own time at home, where I have the luxury of doing whatever I fancy (within reason and budget).

  56. Questionable Opportunities by CherniyVolk · · Score: 1

    You are on the very edge of controversy with such a job. While people in Las Vegas might not think bad, try getting a job in Salt Lake City afterwards.

    OK, suppose Playboy wanted to hire you? Would you go? Playboy being somewhat respected, how about Hustler? They all need IT gurus too. The fact is, they get them, and some of them stay in those industries forever. I also know VCs who will fund "pornographic" businesses, but they don't want as little public connection as possible. It's the whole image of an industry, that people will see in you and this is the issue. It's sorta like having a neck tattoo; only being associated with gambling maybe you can word your resume as far from fact as possible. (If I had a job at Playboy, I probably wouldn't say "Playboy" on my generic resume, but "Major Entertainment Company" and outline the technicalities of my job. At an interview, where they can read my personality and body expression, then I would mention Playboy, in hopes it doesn't sour my image. On the other hand, none of my work at Hustler would be on my generic resume, unless I was hoping to move to another adult entertainment company like Vivid or MetArt. You can get locked in quick.

    Gambling is nowhere near as bad as adult entertainment. I personally wouldn't worry about it. The head IT guy at the Bellagio in Vegas is probably well respected by most he runs into; and he most certainly has that on his generic resume.

    While a job at Playboy would have every male co-worker at your new job thinking you can get them inside the Playboy mansion. Having worked on code for slot machines would have every low-life gambler at your new job begging for information on some mysterious backdoor trick to rob Vegas with. This will probably be your biggest headache having such a job. Best not tell anyone.

    1. Re:Questionable Opportunities by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

      Re: Salt Lake City - more than half the programmers I know in Las Vegas are mormons. Many of them have worked in both places without issue.

      Something interesting about the gaming market, it is pretty easy to get a security clearance if you have held positions with major casinos. They look at you as someone who already has a good security posture.

      M

    2. Re:Questionable Opportunities by geekoid · · Score: 1

      not getting a job in Salt Lake is a plus.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  57. Selling ED Hardy :Handbags For Female,Jacket For M by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Http://www.tntshoes.com

              09 new Jordanating shoes, basketball shoes , new style shoes, brand sports shoes, Air Retro , accept paypal ports shoes,Basketball shoes,Sports shoes Accept PAYPALSize for MEN&WOMEN Basketball shoes size for men: $28-$33

      OUR WEBSITE:
                                                            YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn

                                                                    MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com

  58. It depends by zulux · · Score: 1

    Honesty mode, and only speaking for me:

    If you're clean cut, articulate and not at all slimy - then it will be a good thing to have gambling experience.

    If you're even remotely suspicious looking, it will hinder you as it will give seemingly tangible evidence that you *may* by a risk. ..

    That said, I did hire someone who worked at at offshore gabling site, and the stories were awesome. He came across as someone who I could trust - so that made the hire easy.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  59. Not in the UK.. by chrb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A lot of the British companies doing online gambling have British offices and employees but are actually incorporated in Costa Rica, Panama, Gibraltar, and various other countries with advantageous tax regimes and very little or no regulation. e.g. BetOnSports - Antigua / Costa Rica corporations with UK based holding company, Pokerstars - Costa Rica / Isle of Man; the Isle of Man company appeared after IoM enacted a streamlined deregulation of online gambling which explicitly states it's legal to offer such services to the US at about the same time they introduced 0% corporation tax, quite a fewer companies are now based there, also here's a list for Gibraltar, some big names there include Ladbrokes which is one of the UK's largest gambling operations, and PartyGaming which is one of the largest online poker providers in the world.

  60. No! by Sean · · Score: 1

    As long as they are successful and know how to write quality software it is absolutely not a black mark. There is nothing wrong with internet gambling. If you're interested in a career working with large networked applications then gambling is a great place to be.

  61. Exactly like working for a Bank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well with the CDO amd other 'Financial Engineering' what is the difference

  62. Only offends a tiny group. by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    A Group you probably don't want to work for anyhow; The holier than thou's. However, working for ASIG, Citigroup. or Enron, now there's a black mark a LARGE group of us turn our noses up at.

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
    1. Re:Only offends a tiny group. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Group you probably don't want to work for anyhow; The holier than thou's.

      However, working for ASIG, Citigroup. or Enron, now there's a black mark a LARGE group of us turn our noses up at.

      There are a lot of honest, hardworking people at those companies who had nothing to do with the decisions that brought those companies down or in the case of Enron were the victims of fraud. Are you going to turn up your nose at them?

  63. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Your mom gave me an awesome blowjob. It was anything but boring, but I could do without the shit.

  64. Gray market work by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

    Let me give you some first hand experience about the gray market transition.

        Find a company name that is legitimately associated with the company you are working with, yet doesn't scream "GAMBLING". Use that name for any out-of-industry contacts you have. For example, if you work for offshore_gambling.com, but your company does have web_host_and_dev.com, associate yourself with that. Use the email. Put that on your resume. When you step away from the industry, never reference the gray market industry.

        Most future employers don't even bother contact old employers. For the exceptions, it is very useful to ensure that there is (and will be) provisions where someone can verify your employment.

        I just lost out on probably the best job possibility that I've ever been presented with. As part of that job, it required a very in depth background check (yes, the most in depth background check possible). I didn't get the job because two employers were unavailable to verify my employment history.

        One was a perfectly legitimate mainstream company, who failed to verify anything. The investigator failed to find the business (strike 1).

        The second was an gray market (adult) company. Unfortunately, due to the company shutting down operations, none of the old offices were available to verify my employment, and my best guess for a verifier failed. ("sorry, never heard of that company").

        Mainstream or gray market doesn't matter. It's a matter of the verifiability of your employment, should the need arise later.

        Unfortunately for me, I had told anyone that worked under me that I could be contacted directly to verify their employment. They were given honest reviews, simply avoiding the gray market part of the answers. Since I was the person now being verified, there was no one left to give the honest yet politically correct sanitized review.

        So, it doesn't matter if you're working in a mainstream industry, or a gray market industry, you can always get bitten by a failure to verify in your future.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  65. From Nevada, with Love by RenoGeek · · Score: 0

    This is entirely untrue. Living in a state where gambling is legal in the US, I've worked with many, MANY developers who have come out of companies who supply casinos with the software for their systems. If you can code, and you have the proficiency of, say, a wet piece of bark, yeah, you'll probably not get hired. However, if you come out of working in the gaming industry (or, "the industry" as we call it in NV) with a gleaming resume, the fact that you can say that you've developed successful systems that are currently live in casino "X" will absolutely shine.

    --
    Clones are people two!
  66. Heh, Probably Will Get You a Better Job by techsoldaten · · Score: 1

    I have lived in Las Vegas and become good friends with people in various IT positions in the gambling industry. These people hold jobs ranging from IT infrastructure and security, to developing computerized games, to enforcement and regulation with the Nevada Gaming Commission. I have also lived and worked in Washington DC as an IT contractor, for the government and defense agencies, and have quite a few friends there. At the risk of starting an East Coast / West Coast debate: if anything, the people working in the gaming industry are smarter, sharper, and more attuned to potential problems with a technology package than their DC counterparts. They are less willing to accept defects in a product, more interested in understanding testing procedures and making sure they make sense, and possess a kind of intensity around getting the most out of whatever platform they are working on. For example, I know a few people who design video slot machines for Bally's. The hardware for video slots machines is tightly regulated, consisting of a set of components that is probably less powerful than what you have in your mobile phone. All of the software they write is in C, not C++ or C sharp, it is in C. They write their software so that it can be tested and get every bit of performance out of those machines they possibly can. They understand regulations for how to develop games and work within those strictures without complaining. When there is a change, they are implementing them the first day they possibly can. There is an impossible level of efficiency with these guys and I would hire any of them in a heartbeat. M

  67. You need to get out more. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Vegas is no where close to the worst place in the US (granting it sucks big wet donkey balls).

    Spend some time in Decatur, IL or Birmingham, AL. Then we can talk.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    1. Re:You need to get out more. by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Well played... but at least real estate is cheap in those towns!

      --
      +1 Disagree
  68. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by glwtta · · Score: 1

    You've just described about 90% of all jobs.

    The advice still applies - that other 10% does exist.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  69. Can't speak for the industry in general... by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

    ... but it doesn't sound to me like this is something that would be a "black mark".

    While there are plenty of people out there who find gambling distasteful, working for a software engineernig firm that sells software the gambling industry doesn't seem like it would be worth of causing taint.

    BTW, my recollection is that the many of the online gambling companies split up development and operations into separate legal entities (i.e. you might work for a SE firm that sells to the gambling industry, but the reality could be that you only have 1 client or that all clients are owned by the same person).

    Assuming that that is true, I doubt most people are even aware of it.

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
  70. Are your friends Mormon? by Rexburg · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you should avoid volunteering for Gammy's Bingo night, too.

    --

    ---------
    Launch all sig
  71. The gambling industry is huge by josmith42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You shouldn't have a problem getting another job outside the gambling industry. However, even if you did, the gambling industry is HUGE. From the experience you get at this job, your knowledge of the industry will make you attractive to future employers.

    Also, if you don't have a problem working in the gambling industry, you probably don't want to work for any future employer who does.

  72. jeeezus by smoker2 · · Score: 0

    So instead of putting YOUR balls on the line, you want to get us to take the blame when you fail. I would guess that the very act of posting this on slashdot disqualifies you from the position, or at least from the intelligent employers short list. You are worried about gambling your future by working for a gambling company. Think about it.

  73. It could be worse by obarthelemy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you could be working for a bank !

    Joke aside, I don't think it would hurt you any. I've been part of the hiring process at one of my ex-employers, and we definitely didn't care where the experience was coming from, as long as it was there.

    Furthermore, if a future prospective employer is idiot/bigoted enough to blacklist people who once worked in the gaming industry, regardless of what they did there... will you really want to work for them anyway ?

    On the other hand, don't get suckered by the flashing lights and bling-bling sounds ... is the actual job any good ?

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  74. I'm in gaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's software, like any other software. Gaming machines have many appendages; bill collectors, card readers, button panels, touchscreen, various media, battery monitors, host system (back-end) communication, networking, etc. They're big animals. There are existing standards bodies and laboratories that will vet your work according to various specifications.

    I suppose the sales and marketing side might be shady on occasion but you're not going to see that because you don't know jack about gaming so no one from the front office will want to talk to you. Gaming has it's own vernacular and noobs are only interesting when they're playing.

    It's a growth industry. Easier for states to take a cut of gaming money than crank up taxes.

  75. Let Me Help Find Out, by Controlled Experiment by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Name the company, and I'll see if I can get a job there. Then, after I get a job there, after a while, I will then start to look for another job while still working at this place. After the results are in, I can then submit my findings to here at /..

  76. Anything can be a black mark. by jrhawk42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sadly w/ some HR people anything can be seen as a black mark. Even things you can't change like your name. Something like gambling probably has a higher rate of hitting people's radar due to it's "shady reputation", but you also have to think about yourself. Would you want to work for a company that wouldn't hire an incompetent worker over one that had worked for a gambling software company?

  77. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by xero314 · · Score: 1

    You've just described about 90% of all jobs.

    Or 100% of all jobs that provide stable income.

  78. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Naw... don't get out now.. get some money in the bank, and work on building a new business that will be within that 10%.... It's much better to own more interesting industry than to work a job in the industry :)

  79. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing that can be said for the other 10%, is that they're not all three.

  80. Oh hell yeah! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At least in all of Europe. You already know it, when you find out, that all of them are on some small island with specific tax rules. They are very close to the whole fraud industry.
    Here in Germany, they were caught more than once, fixing all bets. Even on huge events like soccer & co.

    I think of it as the legal arm of the criminals. And if you are in contact with them, soon you end up doing other things where you have to bend your moral values to the breaking point.
    I bet if you dig, you can put half of them straight to jail.

    I know this, because I worked with them. And I would keep as far away from them, as you'd do with the mafia.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:Oh hell yeah! by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Not true. At least in The Netherlands there are state-owned casinos (the "Holland Casino" chain), that of course operate fully legally. That are the only legal casinos though. Besides that, there are numerous lotteries around, run by many private companies. And at least about 10 years ago there were still lots of slot machines all over the place in cafes and snackbars, quite sure they are still there. Haven't been back there in quite a while. The number of machines was regulated - no more than one or two per establishment.

      Other countries in Europe are most likely different in that aspect, but quite sure many if not most of them will have some form of legal gambling.

  81. PORNO??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about working on pornography web sites? Is that a black mark?

    1. Re:PORNO??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about working on pornography web sites? Is that a black mark?

      More like a white stain.

  82. This could work both ways by zevans · · Score: 1

    Consider: You probably don't want to work at any future company that would refuse to hire you for that reason. If you see what I mean.

    --
    "... and more and more now there are all kinds of electronic goodies available" -- Pink Floyd 1972
  83. The only black mark . . . by Patrick+May · · Score: 1

    . . . is not delivering quality software on time and within budget. When I'm hiring, I could give a damn about your coding for a gambling site. Coding for a _sucky_ gambling site would be a problem.

  84. So. by headhot · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't want to work for a company who saw that as a black mark. Are you friends nut bag rightwing religious fundamentalists?

  85. Maybe it is a black mark by mysidia · · Score: 1

    But you won't know whether it's red or black until the roulette wheel stops.

    Could just as easily be a red mark. Can't know until you know.

    Unless you're cheating with hidden magnets, or have a crystal ball, that is..

  86. Not too different from Wall St. by DustCollector · · Score: 1

    I knew a co-worker who programmed lotto machines. He later joined a major stock exchange. Last I heard, he was happily coding for a hedge fund. What all the employers were keen on were his Linux skills -- which were pretty sharp. Maybe working in the gambling industry didn't hurt him because gambling and "investing" are not too different. :)

  87. Ok, but I can think of one consideration ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't let the "industry taboo" change your decision.
    I certainly wouldn't hold that against hiring you
    (my path has been tech, CTO, to CEO).

    The real issue is whether you'll get to complete interesting projects
    to put on your resume (as someone else pointed out) ... and, of course,
    whether you know your sh^t.

    The one issue you might think about is the domain-specific
    knowledge you get. While a good developer (with appropriate
    other work skills) can change domains, virtually any job you take
    will start to pigeon hole you. For your next job, you'll look more
    attractive if you stay in the same industry ... so you'll get more
    offers, perhaps better/higher offers, and there will be numerous
    factors that make it advantageous (to both you and employer)
    to stay in the industry. Rinse, lather, repeat.

    Best of luck,

    steve

  88. The parent is correct. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Posting anon for obvious reasons...) I spent the past 5 years in the video slot business, working in North America, Russia, South America and Mexico. The quality of engineering I saw was mostly bad (worst in the USA, where security needs really aren't that high compared to other markets, and regulations are routinely flouted). The technical management was as incompetent as you'd expect in any software sector.

    But the key thing to remember: At the management level, you are going to rub shoulders with extremely dishonest people. The companies I worked with were riddled with embezzlers and liars. Their scams were often intercontinental and ran to 7 figure thefts (some people I was aware of had stolen 8 figure sums over time). Big money attracts these sort of people like shit attracts flies. Trust your instincts and don't do anything stupid, risky, or with even a hint of double dealing. You won't necessarily be able to figure out who to trust, which can lead to nasty surprises or worse. (It's only a "safe place" if you're very careful and/or lucky.)

    At best it might be a thrilling adventure, and you'll have some stories at the end of it, but you'll also have scars, and you'll lose friends (even honest ones), might end up on the wrong end of a lawsuit brought by guys who love lawyers and have unlimited amounts to spend on them. Or, you could end up assaulted or dead (one man I knew was fond of making quite genuine threats to the life and limb of his programming team, to coerce them to go along with his dishonest schemes).

    If there is one thing I have learned: Criminals have little use for honest people. They neither understand nor tolerate them.

    1. Re:The parent is correct. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Insightful

      one man I knew was fond of making quite genuine threats to the life and limb of his programming team, to coerce them to go along with his dishonest schemes

      FBI agents make careers on that kind of bust. Someone should have made a call.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    2. Re:The parent is correct. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's useful when the dirtbag has already tapped your cell and the FBI tells you to show them the evidence first. Are you really sure that he doesn't have friends on the outside, and that the FBI will put you in witness relocation?

      This isn't a slam on gaming generally; the big companies are above-board enough to be safe. But criminals by definition don't care about the law. Use the Kayser Soze rule: the only way to win in the criminal world is to be willing to do what nobody else will do. If you have scruples, you lose.

    3. Re:The parent is correct. by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      To win in the criminal world, you only have to be willing to go further than the other guy.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  89. CybScryb by cybscryb · · Score: 1

    As someone who lives in Las Vegas and spent the obligatory tour of duty in a casino upon moving here, the only problem might be that a casino generally will only acknowledge your employment and dates of employment. Other than that, you need to collect letters of commendation and recommendation and keep your personal files and you'll be just fine. Although I will say that the stress level is less and life is more enjoyable and healthy out of the gaming industry. Less smoke now that I'm working for UNLV and better hours overall.

  90. You have a job offer in this economy? by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

    Take it. Wondering if a completely legal industry is a "black mark" in some future hiring manager's book is far too much navel gazing. You have to be pragmatic, hire on with this company, and take the opportunity as far as you can.

  91. Bullshit by cenc · · Score: 1

    Why do you think the tech industry holds comdex, defcon, and other IT shows in Las Vegas?

    On the other hand after living in Vegas for many years, I can tell you that the gambling industry does not really think much of IT people as customers. In Las Vegas the guys that go to comdex (defcon) have a bad rep among the casinos. It seems IT people are flush with cash, cheap, and not willing to gamble much because they know the frigen systems are rigged against them. The biggest strike they have against them is they do not tip well.

    You would likely have less of black mark on your carrier than if you where a waitress in Vegas and then tried to get job in some other part of the U.S.

  92. hideous security as in the backroom beat down? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    hideous security as in the backroom beat down?

  93. Go For It by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    You should be fine as long as the next company you apply to doesn't have a god addict in the HR department. If that's the case, the company's probably doomed anyway, and you're better off not working there.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  94. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by selven · · Score: 1

    It's called saving up a few dozen thousand, putting money in when you're doing well and taking money out when you're doing badly. Watch how your income stabilizes if you do that.

  95. Just do it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work for the the gambling industry. Its excellent work, fun and you'll learn a lot fast. It may have a bad sound to it, but in the area I live (Upstate NY, USA), it doesn't affect my chance at a job at all. Most gaming machines run some form of Unix or Linux, and the companies that make them really put out some top notch products. Bally's, IGT, Spielo (GTECH) -- to name a few -- make some really solid machines.

    You'll quickly learn to hate bill validators and card readers, but it shouldn't tarnish your reputation at all.

  96. Huh? by mhkohne · · Score: 1

    I can't conceive of why working in the gambling industry would be a mark against you. It wouldn't make sense. You're either good at writing software or you aren't, it really doesn't matter what industry. The only possible downside is that it's not a large industry, so you probably can't make a lifetime out of working in the same industry. But so what? So far, in the last 17 years, I've worked in the medical equipment field (EEG monitors, blood pressure monitors), industrial non-medical ultrasound (one project in the fish farming industry, one in the lumber industry), the petroleum retail industry (credit card interfaces for gas stations), the cable TV industry (software for video on demand systems), the video test equipment industry (windows device drivers for custom cards) and then back to petroleum retail.

    No one who wants to hire good software people is going to care. No one.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  97. more pussy by jkajala · · Score: 1

    Which one sounds better: "I work for insurance company." or... "I work in gambling business.", so go for it. :P

  98. Gaming Experience: I've never had any problems. by Tharant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I spent the first twelve years of my career working in both the Class II and Class III gaming industries, we don't call it gambling. :)
    I'm primarily a systems administrator and recently decided to find a job outside of the gaming industry. I had expected to find that employers may be concerned about my past employment. On the contrary, most of the employers I interviewed with seemed to be curious about the industry and many of them thought that my experiences from that industry could be an asset.

    The gaming biz is very fast paced, requires real-time systems, requires massive networks, requires high-speed communication, requires complex databases, extensive code-review, requires extensive documentation and may requires extensive background investigations (for certain positions). There's a lot to learn in the business and it's a great place to cut your teeth, it's also very broad regarding the types of development that're needed and you could find just about any type of development position you'd want.

    Just like any industry, there are both good and bad things about the gaming biz but I've enjoyed my time in the business and may go back to it someday and I'd definitely recommend it to others.

    Also, I know few developers in Vancouver that were in the biz for a couple of years and they had no trouble with transitions to other industries.

    -tharant

  99. No worries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are lots of neat IT things you can do in the gaming industry.... all sorts of cool applications of CEP, stats and so forth, all of which have great applications in the gaming industry and elsewhere. If gaming doesn't fit your longer term tastes, there are plenty of applications for the skills you'll learn in finance.

  100. if u r not mafia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u can't get into the job
    so just send it
    and wait for the reject

  101. I think by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

    it would be better than no experience at all.

  102. Poor stereotype by mveloso · · Score: 1

    From what I've heard from the nuke guys, the nuclear weapons industry is full of the highly religious. They feel that their religion makes them more careful and conscientious about their work, and I'd agree.

    If you believe in that stuff, all of us are doing god's work (whether the g is upper or lower case), and that the extra precision and code tightness that you'd learn in the gambling industry would benefit everyone.

    It's you, not the religious, that has the problem. I'm not very religious myself, but they are for the most part better developers than the non-religious in many ways. They definitely are more open-minded.

  103. Gambling is a tax for the poor... at math by edfardos · · Score: 1
    I'd work for a legitimate casino that pays taxes and reports income. Indian or other types of casino's are not legitimate businesses. Besides, they can descriminate, so unless you're native american your job will never be secure. It'd raise an eyebrow if I interviewed you.

    --edfardos

  104. In New Zealand by ukoda · · Score: 1

    Here in New Zealand it would only be a problem for a small number of bigots but for the most part is likely to be positive. In my case it has clearly been a good thing. When I worked for the TAB (horse racing) it required high quality audited code, which looks good on a CV. When I worked for a casino I had be police interview and certified as a reputable citizen which is also good on a CV, and I always thought I was certifiable ;-)

  105. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

    High paying industries are very difficult to quit, no matter if your a saver or a spender. IE a smart saver will not keep cash (especially@0.5% rates we have now) So either you make good investments and don't want to pull money out, or not good ones and you don't feel you have the money to take a cut. Spenders are addicted to new good stuff, and their is always more you will want.
    Also high paying industries are usually specialized, so try not to stay too long. IE anything more than 5 years experience in any development/programming technology is not adding much value. IE if a developer is desired for a web application for a Real estate site, and a choice is given between a developer with 15 years web experience at a gambling site, or a developer with 2 years of web development in reality, likely the 2 years wins, especially if at a lower salary requirement. I have found myself in a higher paying industry, it pays higher initially but you seam to hit a ceiling sooner than a more competitive industry. Thats (IMHO) because their are only 2 high paying companies in my instance, so I did bid up my salary with job changes but now I have gone from the one, to the other big player (started at a lower company). With 16 years, I am now likely too specialized to get a pay raise outside this industry as a developer, and their HR wont allow me to go back as such to my past employers. Now the only way up is to give up on doing something for a living, and go into management. Or take a initial cut to start over in a bigger pond.

  106. Offtopic? Bad moderators... by chrb · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Submitter asks (paraphrased) "I'm currently in the UK been offered a job in the gambling industry and thinking about going to work in US in the future. Any potential problems?"

    Pointing out that several British men involved in the gambling industry have been arrested, some extradited, and prosecuted in the US is Trolling and Offtopic?! How does that work? If the article submitter is serious about wanting to emigrate to the US in the future, then entering an industry where many, if not most, British and offshore companies violate US law on an ongoing basis, and which the US government has already made moves against, is probably something that should be considered.

  107. Mod parent up. by Animats · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up.

    If you work for a regulated gambling operation in the developed world, you'll probably have to undergo a background check. That's a plus. On the other hand, working for some "offshore online casino" is iffy, and may even result in painful interviews with law enforcement and tax authorities.

    One of the interesting aspects of gambling software is that many of the companies that provide services are held financially responsible for both errors and downtime. It's not like the rest of the on-line world, where everything is the customer's fault. If you want to see high-reliability systems, check out the data center behind one of the big state Lotto operations.

  108. I work in the gaming industry by dindi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work in the gaming industry for the last 8 years currently as a programmer, just like you at a place where gambling operations are legal. Before working as a programmer I worked as a sysadmin and for a year as a manager (with technical duties too). I have a formal college degree and I pay taxes and report my income. So does the company where I have a full time consultant (oxymoron??) deal.

    What I see this far is that there are good and bad guys in the industry. While I consider casinos a total scam (even the honest ones) sports betting operations are usually a lot better. Also credit vs post-up operations differ a lot from each other post up ones being more problematic (charge backs, books does not want to pay, legal problems with US gamblers, etc).

    About the US concern: our company does not accept US bettors' money, is completely legal here and so writing programs (or maintaining them) is not illegal by any standards. I see more contacts and work in the industry than at any other workplace this far. Everyone knows everyone and if you are willing to do and can take a little stress here and there you will have people wanting to hire you left and right. Mostly from the gaming industry though.

    There is a movie with a quote "Where there is gambling there are criminals", and take this as an advice. There are people in the industry I do not want to talk to, do not want to be seen with, do not want to know and feel extremely uncomfortable around. Not necessarily criminals, but people whose behavior is not compatible with my standards, but then again I saw upper management at the largest computer manufacturer's IT/Middleware division who did not behave much better than that.

    So... my bet (pun intended) is that you have to look at the environment and the people you will have to work with/for and make a decision. Also find out about what sites/services they run and google the hell out of it. If you see that there are payout complaints and similar issues; RUN.
    I once worked at a place where it became evident that they were ripping people off, I quit after the next paycheck.

    Oh, consider that at gaming operations you might have to deal with extreme paranoia if you are anywhere near their data (financial or player info). You do not want to steal and email out their player list or do something similarly stupid. Be clear about not wanting to see any data or make sure you follow protocol near data. If you are tempted to "prove that their security sucks" either make sure they know your are about to demonstrate something or do not do it. Trust me on that one.....

    Soooo.. this is my 5c of advice, just use common sense and if you see something wrong just pack your stuff and go somewhere else.
    Cheers

  109. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And he's still right.

  110. Yes, but not because they are gambling. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked in the gambling industry, and lots of people did recognise the "curse" of working in the industry. It can make it harder to move back into other fields.

    However, this is not simply because it's gambling (hence, immoral, bad, etc...) -- it's because the gambling industry is renowned for lagging behind best practice in software engineering by 1-2 decades...

    I had to work pretty hard to prove my skills were up to date after leaving, and had to take a 30% pay-cut and drop a rung of seniority to get out...

    Same goes for artists - gambling artists are stereotyped as being stuck in the one style, having no flexibility. They can find it hard to move on as well...

  111. If it interests you do it by bcg · · Score: 1

    I am the development coordinator for one of the world's leading wagering software development companies.
    Having a background in industrial automation and other real time software systems, I can tell you that writing software for gaming (especially when it involves racing) is easily of the same order of writing sharemarket trading software. As its essentially what it is - a great big real time bank. Most of the things you would like to do as batch can't be done, as it can be with a bank, as balances and histories need to be available straight away.
    Most of the guys that work for me have masters degrees (I have the full set) and all need a broad experience in a variety of areas to be even able to work here. Every thing you do touches on performance, scalability and reliability.
    If you worry about the morality of it you're probably wound too tight to be working anywhere. And how many of these hiring companies, especially in america, see military service as a moral plus? If the job interests you do it. If it doesn't don't. And if you're any good and want to work in Australia - send me your resume :-)
    Cheers, Brad
    PS. The one thing I have found doing this, having a PhD, is I understand how the guys working on things like the Manhattan project must have felt. Not commenting on the morality or anything of it, but just how little you think of what it is you are actually doing. For example, rarely do you think of it as being horse racing - all you're concentrating on is getting the right prices in the right columns etc. You just don't think too much about the bigger picture. Just something I found interesting.

  112. three things.. by v4vijayakumar · · Score: 1

    1. gambling
    2. liquor
    3. movies
    generates income for government. (read that in a story, anyone remember that story)

  113. Why would it be? by upuv · · Score: 1

    No one really cares,

    If you are working for a legit business and doing quality work that is all that people care about. There are always some personality types that are going to take offence.

    Gambling Job pisses people off with strong opinions on morality.
    Miltary job pisses off peace lovers.
    Government job brands you as lazy and un-coroperative.
    Tax Office job pisses of your mother and everyone else.
    Transit employee brands you as a unionist and lazy
    Tobaco brands you as a selfish evil abuser.
    etc.

    There is always something.

    Guess what. Do good work. Have something to show for your time. And you will not have issues with future employment.

  114. Black Mark on your SOUL by RileyBryan · · Score: 1

    I worked in the gaming industry for two years and found that feeling partially responsible for completely fucking people over and selling false hope and abusing peoples addictive personalities left me feeling like a true piece of shit. There are great opportunities to to learn and grow in this industry, but if you want your life's work to be more than the abuse of human nature for profit then go somewhere else- thats what I did, and it was my best career move yet.

  115. Definitely not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would be more inclined to LIKE the fact you've had experience working in the gaming industry - the metrics and security around the gaming industry gives developers (in many cases, certainly not all) a lot of insight that they would definitely not get from many other industries.

  116. Statistical strengths by cmdotter · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't have a bias per-se. I'd assume that you'd be able to prove that your time there increased your abilities in statistical analysis, understanding human traits (and how they affect statistics) and pseudo random number generation.

    In fact, if you failed to 'wow' me on those three points, then your time at a gambling location was seriously wasted because they're all good topics to be getting your teeth into.

    If you could prove yourself in those areas, you'd obviously have no problem doing any other job IMHO.

  117. No, it's not a black mark. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked as a contractor to a company that was involved in gaming and wagering and in no way did it affect what I did after that. Quite the opposite. It was an eye opening experience into how government regulation meets IT.

    Consider, for a moment, problems such as auditing and being able to prove that you're complying with the various regulations. Never mind developing an application to support the thing with shining buttons, there's a whole host of other issues too. It's also 24x7x365 and costs money whenever there is down time.

    The worst problem I have with carrying such experience is with the attitude to testing in that industry vs elsewhere. I've seen rooms of machines wired up in an automatic mode, so that long term behaviour is well understood and within the required regulations.

    And as someone else said, once you've worked "behind the scenes" in this industry, you'll never play again because you'll have a good understanding that it's not really your "luck" from a "random" event resulting in a win, but rather being the lucky one to be in the right place at the right time when the controlling computer decides it is time for a jackpot.

    1. Re:No, it's not a black mark. by MLease · · Score: 1

      And as someone else said, once you've worked "behind the scenes" in this industry, you'll never play again because you'll have a good understanding that it's not really your "luck" from a "random" event resulting in a win, but rather being the lucky one to be in the right place at the right time when the controlling computer decides it is time for a jackpot.

      What's the difference between one form of luck (getting the right die roll, RNG output, or whatever) and the other (being in the right place at the right time when the computer "decides" it's time)? Sure, if you know in advance when that right place and time are, you can arrange to be there then, but otherwise, it's still a random event you have no control over. The only real question is whether the odds are correct for the game you're playing.

      -Mike

      --
      I'm sorry; I don't know what I was thinking!
  118. US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least in the US, nobody cares. I would find it difficult to believe it could produce any kind of a black mark. The only thing that matters is your experience. Just do what you want to do.

  119. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    It's software. How is writing code for banks any less boring? Or for pharmaceutical companies? Or for

  120. I would hire you by Samarian+Hillbilly · · Score: 1

    I don't see why the gambling industry would be a problem. Working for malware/spyware/spam distributors or other gray areas is. I'd probably include porn industry as well because most of those sites serve malware as well. Working for the games industry looks great.

  121. Gambling is an addiction like alcoholism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search for "gambling addiction" to see tons of stuff out there explaining what gambling means for weak people and their families.

    If you are a good programmer you can be good at anything and you will surely become something important in your life whatever you do. But do you really want to get involved in the gambling industry?

  122. More stringent than banks or stock exchanges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The gambling industry can be even more rigorous than the banking industry or stock exchanges.

    Many casinos run 24 hours year round. Most stock exchanges and banks don't.

    And I think casinos don't reward employee mistakes as well as the "conventional finance" sector ;).

    They might even be regulated better...

  123. What will be your difference? by Max_W · · Score: 0, Troll

    One person can make a difference. What difference in the world you will be making while working on a gambling company?

    What will be your contribution to a human cause?

    Imagine you are to die in a year or two (it may happen with everyone). What people will say about you? This? "He helped a gambling scam to cheat people big time of their money with his excellent scripts."

  124. I hope you like guido's cooking..... by Bob_Who · · Score: 1

    Spaghetti and Fed Balls, followed by a swim at Hoover Dam. How long can you hold your breath?

  125. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine you are to die in a year or two (it may happen with everyone). What people will say about you? Will you be around to hear it or care?

    Why everybody gotta take everything so serious, yo. He could make a difference for himself and maybe his family in the world while working with a gambling company and die grinning. Causes won't mean much when you're dead. The human race has an unjustified sense of self-importance.

  126. It certainly can be. by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    Many people in HR positions are still actually religious. Many people in policy positions are also religious. There are many religions that look at gambling or contributing to gambling as being a sin.

    While they won't pro-actively think "Hmm... he's been involved in gambling and therefore he's a bastard from the deepest pits of hell", instead it will make at least a subconscious impact on them to see you as an immoral person.

    I would recommend that you avoid the position if possible. I've had friends that have struggled finding work after having been employed by gambling companies that started off legitimate enough, but through changes of management and misappropriation of company resources ended badly.

    1. Re:It certainly can be. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "There are many religions that look at gambling or contributing to gambling as being a sin."

      In reality, that's a tiny number of people. Mst people in religions that specify that till gamble and tend it ignore that rule.

      You anecdote is worthless and it counter to reality.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  127. sorry, nope look at the numbers by poptones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How many of those people are the "slow players?" There are a few high rollers in any given casino and the fact they are treated well is simple logic - but those high rollers can also win and the house has to cover it. How do they cover it? On all those "slow players."

    Why do you think casinos have player's clubs? There's not a casino around that doesn't offer perks of some sort and there are scads of people who exchange info on these perks and use that info in selecting their next vacation destination. Retirees sometimes count in that lot but as often as not don't.

    Those "slow gamblers" are the bread and butter. They're the people willing to write off 50 or 100 bucks as "entertainment expenses" and will leave happy and return first chance they get so long as they have a full belly from a cheap dinner, or a nice buzz from the cheap booze, or just a good attitude brought on by the hours of fun and the good floor show they watched while they played.

    People become addicted to gambling and lose sight of reality. This is no different than any other addiction. You can't make other people's weakness your problem or you'll never work again - I can't work in food services cuz fat people will get fatter; I can't work in medicine because people use hospitals to seek drugs and avoid work; I can't work in the engineering sector because someone might use my project for stealing data or swapping kiddy porn or whatever.

    Gambling is entertainment. I know dozens of people who love to gamble and venture from time to time to the casinos. Not one of them leaves for the casino expecting anything but a full belly and a good time. It's not a problem for a single one of them - save for most are too poor due to the aftereffects of king george's collapsed economy to play as often as they'd like.

    1. Re:sorry, nope look at the numbers by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      - but those high rollers can also win and the house has to cover it.

      AAAAARRRRRRGGGGHHHHHHGH. You're trolling me. Right? I'm throwing goats over the bridge; aren't I. Please; I'll give you a whole cow if you just admit it. Please .. please? Oh.

      The high rollers do not win. The house <blink>always</blink> wins. Every time you hear about someone winning big, that is because the casino bosses want you to hear about it so you think there is a "chance" to win. In the technical, mathematical sense, of course there is. Otherwise it a) wouldn't be legal and b) they wouldn't get their publicity. But in real life; forget it.

      the scary thing is that slashdot is meant to be for "nerds"; you should be the statistcally literate people in the population. You should be able to understand this. If you can't; then we're doomed.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    2. Re:sorry, nope look at the numbers by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

      The high rollers do not win.

      No, the _some_ high rollers win, too. That's simply because compared to the house, their funds are still negligible. If they had anywhere near the houses level of funds, they wouldn't be high rollers, they would have their own casino. Of course, you don't hear about _all_ the high rollers that lose. You may here about some of them, it gets people excited. "Hey, I could own that rich dudes money if I win!"

      Every time you hear about someone winning big, that is because the casino bosses want you to hear about it so you think there is a "chance" to win.

      Of course there's a chance to win. There's also more than one chance to lose. People win the lottery all the time, too. That doesn't mean that running the lottery isn't hugely profitable (probably more than any casino. Compared to common casino games, the average payout of a lottery is pretty close to zero).

    3. Re:sorry, nope look at the numbers by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1
      I say

      . In the technical, mathematical sense, of course there is

      You say

      Of course there's a chance to win. There's also more than one chance to lose.

      RTFA Troll does not write his posts for you to fail to read in detail. To deserve a response student must study. Do not to repeat points already covered.

      (read in Mr. Miyagi voice after at least two large glasses of cheap but good Portugese wine)

      High rollers; may have indefinite funds; certainly as large as the Casino. The problem is the same at all levels. There are people losing millions, but it doesn't matter because it's just pocket change to them.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  128. Yes, your instincts are correct by CompletelyCluless · · Score: 0

    Yes, your instincts are correct. Gambling sites are seedy and gambling experience will make most grimace. Not just on moral grounds but it also suggests that you were desperate enough to take a job in this industry at some point. And desperation on resume = bin. That said we’re in deep recession. If you’re really stuck take it, keep looking for something better and leave it off your Resume. But *really* make it short term and avoid normalizing to it like the plague as you risk getting stuck in the industry due to reduced options.

  129. The biggest IT employer in Durban... by LordAndrewSama · · Score: 1

    ... Is this company that makes online gambling software for use around the globe. Everyone from college wanted to get a programming job from them(straight out of college, haha noone did. I got a job quickly by sending my CV around to other companies while everyone was pining for their dream job). It was considered the best place to work in durban for IT. Anyways, I did have a friend who worked there, and he said it was great for his CV when he moved to JHB, and a nice environment, good pay, etc etc.

    I guess you either get in with a company that wants to take money unscrupulously, or a company that makes gambling games for people to enjoy, and profits like that. If you go for it, I hope it's the latter.

  130. What a load of tosh. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Lots of people gamble as a pastime, in a way akin to going to the cinema. for the small adrenaline rush you get by doing something out of the mundane where you could actually win a bit of money if you are lucky.

    Most people that gamble know that they will lose and the house will win, but the element of uncertainty is enough to make it a pleasurable pursuit.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:What a load of tosh. by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      The only thing wrong with your post is that the title is completely opposite to the content. Exactly these people are stupid, the level of their stupidity is equivalent to their belief in the uncertainty. The outcome is known, long in advance. The house always wins.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  131. It depends... by gadders · · Score: 1

    Somewhere like betfair, I would view positively. They're effectively a stock-exchange for sports.

    Some of these flash-based games that encourage poor people to gamble their benefits? I'd personally find it hard to work for them, but wouldn't use it as a black mark in hiring decisions.

  132. What an ass. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I spent the same amount in one day at the horse races.

    You talk to lots of interest people, including very fetching chicks, look at all the ceremonial of the races, the beauty of the horses, and then to top it all, you can risk a couple of bob to make matters more interesting while watching the races, and spectacle on it sown right.

    Only a nerd would chose to sit alone playing a game in preference to such a rich and interesting afternoon.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  133. Harmful in which way? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    If you have a compulsive personality gambling is just one of many avenues to exacerbate your problem.

    Many people just take a bit of money lose it, and once in a while win a bit more, and go home once they are done, happy with the adrenalin rush provided by the small probability of winning something.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Harmful in which way? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      The probability that a gambler will walk away a winner from a night at most casino games (blackjack, craps, roulette, etc..) can be controlled with one of the various betting systems. This is possible because players choose how much they want to bet at any given time. Changing bet size based on how the nights been going can't reduce the houses edge, but it does afford the gambler some control over the distribution of possible outcomes.

      At the two extremes you've got the two classic images of gamblers. The guy who "lets it ride" walks away a small loser the majority of the time, while the "chases his losses" guy walks away a small winner the majority of the time. Both are going to lose all their money over the long run, but one night doesn't make a long run.

      On a related tangent is Kelly Betting. If the tables were turned and you had the edge on those games, then there is an optimal percentage of your bankroll that you should wager each hand/roll/spin that will maximize your bankroll growth rate. The so called Kelly Criterion.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  134. What has gambling to do with large sums of money? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    You see, the problem of many people deriding gambling is that they have no idea of the numbers involved.

    You can happily spend only $10 or $20 and have a couple of enjoyable hours, or more if you are lucky.

    If you are so afraid of yourself then take only the amount of money you can lose and leave you credit card at home.

    The adults amongst us are rational enough to set a limit and go home once we reach it. We can also drink only a glass of wine a night and have stopped smoking. In other worlds we have self control. You should try it some time.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  135. Playboy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, which modern western person thinks that Playboy is objectionable?

    It has been legitimized for ages, and can be argued it is a cultural icon.

    Hard Core porn would be a different matter, and still, most people in civilized places (Europe, Japan) would not bat an eyelid, perhaps would find it an amusing career choice.

  136. I would say go for it... by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

    If I was reviewing your application, and you had worked in the gambling industry, my thought process would be along the lines of:

    • Has worked in an industry which is heavy regulated.
    • Has probably been vetted by the local gambling authority, so most likely reliable.
    • The software they worked on has to conform to external standards, most likely requiring that it be as close to zero defect and as error tolerant as you can possibly get.

    So, all in all, you would be a win.

    Of course you will also get people who see "but gambling is evil and therefore so are they". You'll also get the same reaction from other people if they see you've worked in any number of other industries, like pharma or petro-chem. Right about now there are probably people who consider anything to do with finance to be equal to living in sin with Satan.

    If you spend all your time worrying about how other people will view your previous employers you'll never take any job. If you're OK with working for them, then go for it. Personally I'd love to work for VideoBox, because their content delivery network has to be fucking awesome.

    --

    Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  137. Gold has lost vaule in real terms. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    When inflation is considered, gold has not kept its value. You would be better off having put your money in a savings account at 3% pa 30 years ago.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Gold has lost vaule in real terms. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold has intrinsic value paper does not.

  138. Depends on where you live by cbope · · Score: 1

    As you're in the UK, I would say that more than likely it is not a negative to work in the gambling industry. However, in some parts of the US, gambling is highly stigmatized and considered a sin. This is especially true in the bible belt (a large chunk of the southeast US) and other more religiously conservative areas of the country. I still remember 20+ years ago in my home state (in the southern US) when they first brought in the state lottery and horse racing, it was not pretty.

  139. UK Bookies? by Inda · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding? Jump at the chance to work for one of the big boys: Ladbrokes, Will Hill, Stan James, Bet365, Paddy Power... the list of players goes on and on.

    There is no stigma. Everyone likes a gamble. Most of us are not addicted to it and only place 50p bets.

    I'd love to work for one of them. The maths alone fascinates me.

    The worse of them all is the government sponsored lottery. Stay away, stay away.

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    1. Re:UK Bookies? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Let me fix that for you:

      "The worse of them all is the lottery. "

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  140. No black mark at all. by 16Chapel · · Score: 1

    I can't really think of any work that someone could have done that would stop me from hiring them - certainly not gambling sites, which I would expect to be entirely above board and close to the cutting edge in terms of experience. I wouldn't be put off by someone who had experience in the adult industry... that would make me a hypocrit as my wife worked as a sub-editor for Club magazine for 5 years. It didn't hurt her prospects either - she told me that when she interviewed for her current job (now subbing for a telecomms magazine), the interviewer very seriously looked over her previous work, the Christmas Pussy episode of Club International.

    I guess the thing that would be closest to a black mark would be any kind of enterprise that obviously failed - someone who had worked at Boo.com would have to answer some hard questions (e.g. what were you thinking?), but even then I still wouldn't blame the developers for the ethical / commercial decisions that the bosses had taken.

  141. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Differentiate between a "smart saver" and someone ensuring they have a few months salary available in liquid form.

    Frankly the first 3 months gross salary I have in savings can earn as little as it likes as long as I can access it relatively risk free as cash within a month.

    It gives me financial security, peace of mind and the ability to tell my employer to go fuck himself if he ever steps out of line. That's worth far more to me than an extra 4-5% return on investment.

  142. Seeing responses strengthens it.... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    It's quite like a lot of events in the Human life time:

    1. If you take a chance at things turning out well, you may succeed or lose, and people will like and dislike you, depending on their tendencies.

    2. If you don't take a chance, you may be missing out on a possibly great opportunity, or may have avoided a bad opportunity. Either way, you will feel "this way or that" about the outcome. Depends on what you find out about it later and/or how much you think about it.

    Conclusion:

    If you listen to your brain when the right hemisphere interacts with the left and gives you that "warning" indicator, there is a reason, based on your knowledge and life experience. If you go after something that you feel may be of a threat to you, then you will always be worried that there is a possible negative outcome on the horizon, regardless of the current conditions. Opposed to that concept, if you "go with your gut instinct" and don't take the opportunity, you will also be concerned that you missed something that may have been the best career choice in life.
    The best choice (IMHO and based on my near-death) is to live life and ignore the "what ifs." Go with your gut instincts and spend time, but not too much time, solving analytical issues that may provide you with better answers as your life matures.

    Something's nagging you right now to be concerned about this being a possible threat. That means (again, IMHO) that this one isn't for you. Keep looking, but don't stop learning. It may change in the future, or may not.

    Wow, the whole concept in and of itself is a gamble. You know what I mean :)

  143. You'll be fine by MartynH · · Score: 1

    I have worked in the Gambling industry for about 3.5 years now (I'm 30 - got out of uni in 2001) and if nothing else I've found that it's helped my career. I'm getting job offers from a wide range of different industries (investment banks, indie software houses, startups, big name search engines etc). Obviously personal mileage may vary and it depends on who you work for (my current company is a big named betting exchange), but I certainly can't see any 'black mark' being applied to you because of it. Just make sure the company you work for is legal and above board or the whole USA thing may be an issue.

  144. It's all in how you put it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may work in the gambling industry, but you write down Broad-spectre Public Risk Management on your resume, dummy.

  145. No problems in Chile by BassKnight · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine worked as a programmer for a company that sells gambling machines with clients in Peru and Austria AFAIK. A few months ago he resigned and went to a non-gambling related company (for a better salary) without problems.

  146. show me a moral industry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Show me a moral industry and I'll show you one that isn't pursuing capitalistic virtues.

    I'm a software developer for a company that supplies software for the betting industry. It is far and away the best job I've ever had.

    I get to work with fascinating technologies (ATL / WTL / C++ / DirectShow / DirectX ) and it's _great_ experience if I ever decide I want to move on elsewhere.

    I would estimate that a very large proportion of IT graduates in the UK end up in .NET jobs, writing (boring) websites.

    I have also worked for a really _big_ "moral" multi-national. I won't mention who, but they claim they invented the CPU. That job was on the other hand, the least interesting job I ever had. It was all VB/SQL/ASP and you weren't allowed to use techologies that weren't "approved" by the powers that be, the idea being that its cheaper to replace programmers if they all write in VB.

    My experience of coding in the UK has led me to conclude - go for the startups as they have the best pay, the best technologies and the best people to work with. And forget about your morals, you're a capitalist.

  147. Gambling to Intel by gryf · · Score: 1

    I never worked for a company involved for gambling, but my father did. After many years working for a company that did security related work for slot machines, my father then moved to Intel. Largely to reduce time spent traveling IIRC. There should be no reason to be concerned. As mentioned elsewhere, the gambling industry has a high customer standard for security so it's more like a positive point to have experience there.

    --

    #-#
    Ad Astra Per Aspera
    A rough road leads to the stars
  148. No issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm late on the thread but I worked for 7 years in the gaming industry. I now work for a U.S. Federal Agency and was sought by them because of the skills I learned at that job.

  149. ...its a great job..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Im in the industry myself and make 3D games for the one and only 3D (opengl) casino on the interwebs.

    Its more fun then making regular games in that way your customers are adults and not a bunch of nagging kiddies and you get to interact with them on a 'normal' basis.

    PS W're hiring too!!! :p

  150. Oh noes! Teh gamblin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will we ever stop getting our moral cues from the Victorian era?

  151. I work in Gambling by John+Jamieson · · Score: 1

    After my schooling my first job was programming full time for a Lottery. I was there many years and has not caused me any problems, in fact, it is a good niche.

    Since then, I have done contracts in other fields, and no one has EVER mentioned "gambling".

    People tend to develop areas that they work in(due to specialized market skills), and I work now tend to work in Lotteries, Bank Trading systems and Mortgages. (all rather similar) So you don't have to worry that you will be locked in the Gaming/Lottery field.

  152. big turn off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, work experience in the gambling industry is a big turn off. For potential job candidates, my turn ons are puppy dogs, sunsets, and long walks on the beach.

  153. No way would it reflect badly. by JohnPombrio · · Score: 1

    At HP, I would repair the equipment folks would be writing to the firmware and software to gambling machines in Rhode Island. This was in a corporate park far away from any casinos. They wore the usual work office apparel and unless I looked at the equipment of asked them what they were doing, I would NEVER be able to tell that they were working on slots. Small teams, good camaraderie, good working environment, and no impossible deadlines. Hell, just tell the next recruiter that you were working on random number generators!

  154. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here here. For most of my life I've kept at least enough cash on hand to pay my mortgage and household bills for 6 months. Recently, my wife and I bought a house and had to tap into this reserve to make our down payment.

    Now I would like to tell my employer to go fuck himself, and for the first time in years I have to wait until I line up the next gig before I do it.

  155. Think about by aunt+edna · · Score: 1

    ... the company you'd be keeping.
    I think that, generally, the ethos in a firm is passed down by its founders. Witness, for instance, the large accountancy firms (came to the fore via their 19th century predations.)

    Give them a miss, I vote.

  156. One Caution by ibm1130 · · Score: 1

    As a number of others have pointed out you'll probably learn a lot about high security applications and I don't think there's any sort of black mark associated with such employment going forward. However if you enjoy gambling in Vegas you might want to consider that the gaming regulators take a very dim view of people associated with the technical side of the industry showing up in casinos While I lived in Silicon Valley I took courses at local colleges and universities. Two of my instructors mentioned they weren't allowed to go to Vegas casinos because they had been employed by a gaming machine manufacturer and the Nevada gaming regulators ( decades before ) respectively.

  157. I work in gaming by Kevria · · Score: 1

    I know plenty of ex-coworkers who transitioned from writing software for the gaming industry into other industries. It has never been a black mark that I have been able to detect.

  158. Gambling should be fairly respectable ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... at least compared to something really questionable, like banking.

  159. Entertainment Value by natehoy · · Score: 1

    If you want to be entertained for a couple of hours, I suppose playing the slots in Vegas is about as cheap as, say, renting a movie, and a hell of a lot cheaper than seeing a show.

    Of course, watching other people gamble and checking out the casinos is even more entertaining and generally costs nothing. But gambling with real money doesn't appeal to me. I guess I was too good at math. :)

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  160. I moved from the gambling industry to "normal" by Mike_EE_U_of_I · · Score: 1

    I've done it. I wrote a bunch of books on horse racing (and still sell selections). After that, I was offered (and accepted) a position at a top consumer information provider (one of the three companies that provide your credit reports).

        The gambling past I had was a HUGE positive. My books were how they found me, and many people asked about my experiences in the gambling world. From a career point of view, getting involved in the gambling industry was nothing but a positive, wound up making me much more popular and well known in the little division where I worked, and landed me a higher paying job than I otherwise would have had.

  161. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by Surt · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but the line for those jobs is tens of thousands of applicants long right now. If he's the type of person debating taking a job in an industry he's unsure about, he probably doesn't stand out enough for that 10%.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  162. Two things by geekoid · · Score: 1

    1) No, it's not a bad mark.

    2) your friends are idiots wouldn't bother to bury in the desert.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  163. I hope not! by devlp0 · · Score: 1

    I've been working for gamblers for the last few years, out in Gibraltar. I started in the dev team of one company, but now run in an infrastructure team of another. I don't have any ambition to go to north America particularly myself, but a colleague of mine has a wife and family living States' side, another colleague is American himself (very loud) - so I presume they would hope not to have entry into USA issues post employment here. I have seen a wide angle of work ethics within the gambling industry, some companies being quite strict on software releases and infrastructure changes being rolled out to production, others running along the lines of "free-for-all" changes in production - bless them. So do ask the right questions in interview, otherwise you could find yourself applying Saturday night changes in production ....

    --
    >/dev/null 2>&1
  164. my personal opinion by Max_W · · Score: 1

    OK. Some folks write that it would not be a Black Mark, some that it would be.

    Probably for some it would be, for some not.

    As for me, personally, in my opinion, it would definitely be a big black mark. I would probably never tell you this in your face if I will have to work with you in one team.

    But, frankly, I would never consider you a part of a fair world, part of a goodness. Never ever. You will be in my opinion a part of force of darkness and evil.

    I do not argue that this opinion is correct for everyone. It is just the way I feel about it.

    As Gandhi wrote: "Be the change you want to see in the world." What change will you be?

  165. Suspension of disbelief vs. self-delusion by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    Right, but in this case the suspension of disbelief can be directly harmful.

    No, actual self-delusion can be directly harmful, because it can result in committing resources not warranted by the rationally expected utility (that is, the entertainment value.) Willing suspension of disbelief and self-delusion are actually very different things; and often only the former is needed to enjoy gambling and, thus, to derive entertainment utility from it.

  166. Online gambling programmer? by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

    If I wrote web code for an online gambling site, it could be used anywhere, not just in the US. And it's really unlikely that the government would come after me, unless I was foolish enough to have my name on the registration of the site.

    And even if they did, I'd roll over faster than my 401k...

  167. Re:No. Its not a black mark. Its a bad industry by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    The bit about "move elsewhere" is interesting. What if we were talking about tobacco or alcohol. There are some parts of the country where tobacco, alcohol and gambling are flat out bad social baggage. If you live in and wish to work in these towns take stock of the job market and take care in deciding to take the job.
    In todays job market getting a quality job is just hard, so do not err on the side of imagined bias.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  168. intrinsic value? by gizmo_mathboy · · Score: 1

    I think not. It's a worthless metal for day to day use.

    Steel, copper, and aluminum have more intrinsic value. Things can be made and used with those materials. Hell, fired clay has more value than gold.

    Gold is a shiny, soft metal. It has a value assigned to it as much as paper of the digits of my online bank account.

  169. They told me that about porn. by NerdENerd · · Score: 1

    My first programming job was with a porn company. A lot of people told me that it was a career move that would get me stuck in the porn industry. After about six months I was sick of the job and started looking for a new job. When I got an interview with a bank for an Internet Banking role I told them exactly what I did for the last company minus what the content we were distributing was. Nobody ever asked me in the interview what sort of sites I was developing, just my technical experience. Once I had the job for a few months I told the people I worked with at the bank what my last roles was and they all kind of had a giggle at it.

  170. I WON! by poptones · · Score: 1

    If I walk into a place with 100 grand and walk out with 110 grand, I won ten grand. You can wax as philosophic as you like, but the fact remains gambling and earning profit from it is how most folks would define "winning." The fact the house ALWAYS wins in the end only reinforces the point I just made.

    1. Re:I WON! by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

      If I walk into a place with 100 grand and walk out with 110 grand, I won ten grand.

      sure sure; just as long as we ignore the other 600grand you already dumped into the place in your previous visits. It's all a matter of sanity^W definitions. Feel free to stick to your definition of "win" and I'll stick to mine. Than you.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  171. Why leave the UK? by rolandw · · Score: 1

    I'm not worried about recruiting people who may have experience working in the gambling industry - in fact that would probably be a good thing. I'm more worried that you are thinking of leaving the UK. We find it hard to recruit really good juniors in the UK (small firm, not well known but with some great work and based smack in the centre of London) so why do you want to leave? You must be better than most - you already read /.

  172. be careful because its an addictive job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Problem is that because online gambling pays so much and there are so many fools in it just taking the big wage you are grouped together with those.
    Once people get into the online gaming industry its very hard to go back to a normal job where you get low wages and have to be competent.

  173. NOW U Will Sell 09 Newest Sell Armani sweater ma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

          Http://www.tntshoes.com bis the wholesale for many kinds of fashion shoes, like the nike,jordan,prama,adidas, also including the jeans,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations. All the products are free shipping, and the the price is competitive, and also can accept the paypal payment.,after the payment, can ship within short time.

      1)free shipping
      2)competitive price
      3)any size available
      4)accept the paypal

        OUR WEBSITE:
                                                            YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn

                                                                    MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com

                                                                      Http://www.tntshoes.com

  174. Been There. Done That by mpapet · · Score: 1

    Depends. Does the company have games Nevada/New Jersey licensed? That's a tier 1 job in the gaming industry. Steady work.
    Tier 2 is Indian gaming. There are a bunch of game companies at this level that aren't the big-three. Working for these guys can be good but it'll be much more entrepreneurial environment. Lack of resources, lack of a reputation outside gaming too.

    *Some* gaming industry software is very tough coding. Most is graphics/compliance/device interface programming. You probably won't get to the hard stuff for a long time. But it can be very steady work with interesting problems.

    Finally, the gaming industry is a big silo with three gigantic companies owning most of the industry, not very many links outside and weak generalized brand awareness. (Oracle vs. IGT) A smart company *outside* of gaming that has the slightest clue would snatch you up in a minute. But, most HR departments aren't that smart.

    --
    http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
  175. ED Jacket,Bape Air Shoes,BOSS Skirt fashion enjoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Http://www.tntshoes.com
    Hi friend, we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos
    we have large brand new shoes,clothing, handbag,sunglasses,hats etc for sale, 300000% best quality with the amazing price. please look at the pictures and the price of our product in our website, if interested, please email me by Http://www.tntshoes.com or place the order directly via our website please see below of the price list of some products,

      OUR WEBSITE:
                                                              Http://www.tntshoes.com

                                                            YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn

                                                                    MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com

  176. Wholesale Afflictionn T-shirt in Lowest Price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.tntshoes.com

        Professional LEATHER OEM exporter manufacture
    Over 800 bag workers
    Over 10 years' export experiences
    Over 20 years'experience in the bag filed
    Handbags are our speciality
    Our market is the export market
    Customer service is our top priority
    Warmly welcome foreign business
    The exhibition we attend every year
    1:Asian Pacific Leather Fair
    2:China Import and Export Commodities Fair
    Top quality ! Competitive Price ! Prompt delivery !
    ( Wholesale lady/fashion/women/brand/leather/designer/handbags/ handbag/bag/bags/wallet/wallets/purses/purse/luggage/shopping bag(OEM) )

                OUR WEBSITE:
                                                                YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn

                                                                    MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com

                                                                              HTTP://www.tntshoes.com