Slashdot Mirror


iPhone's Liquid Sensors Can Be Triggered By Wintertime Use

An anonymous reader writes "The Polish website Moje Jabluszko ran an experiment that proves the poor reliability of the liquid contact indicators (original, in Polish) installed by Apple in the iPhone. They performed three different tests to challenge the LCIs, which they recorded as a movie. They decided to mimic regular usage of the iPhone — meaning, you go outside where it could be cold or warm, then move inside in a building where temperature might be dramatically different, but still within covered conditions. So, they placed the iPhone in its box for one hour outside at -11 C, then moved it inside at room temperature for 24 hours. They repeated the experiment 3 times, and after the third cycle they could show that the LCI located in the audio jack plug started turning red! This is a clear proof that LCIs are not reliable and could turn red while the iPhone has been used under the defined environmental requirements defined by Apple. Here, only the condensing water could have been in contact with the sensor. In other words, even moving in and out during regular winter time will make you iPhone LCI turn red!" (In the tech specs for the iPhone, Apple rates the non-operating temperature range as -20 to 45 C.)

484 comments

  1. Doubly unreliable by samurphy21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We do a lot of service on macbooks at work, and there's been times when we've taking a unit in for service that "won't turn on" and the user "has no idea why", only to find out they're drippy inside, and none of the liquid sensors are tripped.

    1. Re:Doubly unreliable by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Funny

      They really have liquid sensors in them? That seems so... Orwellian. Does that not bother anyone else?

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:Doubly unreliable by bsDaemon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think Orwell has anything to do with putting a sensor strip that turns color if you dunk the computer in water, clearly in violation of the warranty. So, while it may be kind of a dick move, its not some secret authoritarian plot of doom.

    3. Re:Doubly unreliable by sp332 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's basically self-defense for the laptop. What's Orwellian about it?

    4. Re:Doubly unreliable by LtGordon · · Score: 5, Funny

      They really have liquid sensors in them? That seems so... Orwellian. Does that not bother anyone else?

      I can't quite figure out if this is flamebait, or if I'm just the only person who can't make a connection between liquid sensors in a consumer electronic device and a dystopian police state. If a liquid sensor bothers you so much, I hate to be the one to tell you, but ... don't turn your iPhone around ... there's even a camera!

      So, no, to answer your question: it doesn't seem to bother me a bit.

    5. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an T-Mobile sidekick. The power connectors have bent and broken. Repeat, the power connectors are bent.

      But the little white square has the smallest portion of red on an edge. So I potentially have to pay more than I have spent on insurance fees to get a replacement 3 year old phone.

      Its like saying my car radio not working is the result of my bumper having NORML bumper stickers.

    6. Re:Doubly unreliable by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      Well, the camera would bother me if Apple used it to record me voiding the warranty, and watched a playback of everything it had recorded when I took the iPhone in for service. That would not be cool.

      But these LCIs, that's what they do on a very basic level. For some reason, I'm not comfortable with that. Maybe I'm just not indoctrinated into this new privacy-free culture enough.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    7. Re:Doubly unreliable by zizzo · · Score: 1

      Almost all modern electronics have these little sensors. It's so manufacturers rightly don't have to cover warranty repairs for your accidental swim in the lake.

      But yeah, they aren't necessarily reliable.

    8. Re:Doubly unreliable by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      That's not what they do at all. I don't really see how this violates your privacy.

    9. Re:Doubly unreliable by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      It could merely have been a particularly bashful sensor.

    10. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, it is self defense for the insurance company that has to pay out for warranty claims, not the laptop. And that is a little bit like the insurance company watching what you do with the laptop.

    11. Re:Doubly unreliable by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's worse. The LCI sensors can be activated without doing anything that violates the warranty.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    12. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you think the iphone is the only device with a liquid sensor? there's one in MOST electronic devices (mobile ones anyway).. the reason is there is because the warranty does not cover water damage (dropping in in the sink/toilet)..

      this study seems a little lacking. what was the ambient humidity? how much is required to trip the sensor and how does this compare with other devices? did they take a BBerry and subject it to the same conditions and it passed? what about the location of the one they tested - metal heats/cools faster, so there could be more condensation near the metal parts (headphone jack) how did the one at the other end (near the mic) fare? did all the sensors get triggered?

      does a tripped sensor automatically mean you'll get denied a replacement if something goes wonky?

    13. Re:Doubly unreliable by justinlee37 · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to some of the other posts on here, it seems like Apple has already covered this in the warranty agreement by specifying that the phone shouldn't be used in humid air where water can condensate.

      Lame, sure, but hardly a conspiracy.

    14. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But these LCIs, that's what they do on a very basic level. For some reason, I'm not comfortable with that. Maybe I'm just not indoctrinated into this new privacy-free culture enough.

      That's not what they do at all. I don't really see how this violates your privacy.

      GP really likes Apple products, and these LCIs detect liquid. GP should just be glad they're not using blacklights like in those "dirty hotel room exposés"

    15. Re:Doubly unreliable by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the problem is that the LCI will trip even if the device is turned off

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    16. Re:Doubly unreliable by justinlee37 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Granted, that's a problem, but it is not some Orwellian violation of your privacy. Comparing a less-than-perfect LCI to the dystopian police state portrayed in 1984 is some of the most hysterical chicken-little "the sky is falling" bullshit imaginable.

    17. Re:Doubly unreliable by AnotherShep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't really think that's a "privacy-free" culture you're describing. Also, I have no desire to exist in your "warranty-free" culture.

    18. Re:Doubly unreliable by biryokumaru · · Score: 4, Funny

      Psh, with iPhones for $40, who needs warranties?

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    19. Re:Doubly unreliable by poopdeville · · Score: 5, Insightful

      According to some of the other posts on here, it seems like Apple has already covered this in the warranty agreement by specifying that the phone shouldn't be used in humid air where water can condensate.

      That's not an enforceable clause anywhere I know of. The iPhone is marketed as a portable phone, among other things. It's not portable if you can't take it into environments people commonly go into. Ergo, this all falls under the implied warranty of fitness for purpose.

      Good luck fighting for it when Apple has "evidence" against you.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    20. Re:Doubly unreliable by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Apple should not be permitted to advertise a warranty if that warranty does not cover typical use.

      Imagine this advertisement:

      Buy FooPhone now. Ultra-reliable! LIFETIME WARRANTY*!

      (Then, in tiny print:)

      * covers phone kept indoors at least 6" away from any fabric materials, and at a temperate strictly between 65 and 75 degrees Fahrenheit. Does not cover battery, bluetooth receiver, flash storage, or LCD screen. Non-transferable.

      That's clearly unreasonable and is at odds with what a typical person would expect from a warranty. Sanctity of contract is not absolute: a company shouldn't be able to make up whatever terms of wants for a contract and call it by a name that denotes something only vaguely related.

    21. Re:Doubly unreliable by mysidia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not what it does that's at issue, it's what it will be used for.

      It's basically a litmus test. If it's red, your warranty service will be refused, even if what the sensor indicates is an error.

      You may have received the laptop with the sensor already triggered.

      Some condition (other than you dunking or getting the PC weight), such as the one described in the article might have triggered it.

      Anyways, if you have a problem, your warranty service gets refused as if you dunked it, even though you did not.

      The CSR will just assume you're lying, since the "sensor" proves you dunked it. That's what's sort of Orwellian [mechanism above human].

    22. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Privacy my ass. You're either getting a laugh at all the gullible folks falling for your troll, or you're an overreacting moron.

    23. Re:Doubly unreliable by Evil+Shabazz · · Score: 0, Troll

      A very well played troll, sir. This silly "OMG, liquid sensors that are in every phone made today are a violation to my privacy!" thread got a lot of folks hook, line, and sinker. :)

      --
      Down with the career politician! SUPPORT TERM LIMITS
    24. Re:Doubly unreliable by dhall · · Score: 1

      the phone shouldn't be used in humid air where water can condensate

      So I guess both the Pacific Northwest and the UK are screwed.

      And the previous article on Slashdot - http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/02/16/2146227/A-Warming-Planet-Can-Mean-More-Snow

      Means even more humidity.

      Next they'll say you can't operate the phone near a kitchen or bathroom since they contain water. And public restrooms, completely out of the question.

    25. Re:Doubly unreliable by farble1670 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i don't see why a manufacturer should give me a new laptop / phone / etc if i drop it in water. they cover defects not misuse. if they did cover things like that, the price goes up for everyone. i take care of my stuff and i'd rather not overpay up front so dummies can get a new laptop by dropping it in the tub.

    26. Re:Doubly unreliable by pydev · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it also turns color when you don't dunk it in water.

      And where is this going to end? Is the device going to keep a permanent record of its GPS coordinates and accelerometer readings? Is Apple going to start recording all the sounds around the phone to make sure that it wasn't used in the commission of a crime?

    27. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to lose your phone.

    28. Re:Doubly unreliable by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Actually I think Apple products are overpriced crap and I'll never buy one or use anything other than my lovely PC. You don't have to love Apple to realize that the OP is overreacting by calling the LCI "Orwellian." Thanks for playing.

    29. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moisture capacity of air is a function of temperature, roughly quadratic. To a censor at -11C even dry room temperature air would appear as a bath house.....................

    30. Re:Doubly unreliable by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They really have liquid sensors in them? That seems so... Orwellian. Does that not bother anyone else?

      Liquid sensors on a mobile device are Orwellian.. +2 Interesting. And Apple fans are the ones considered to be in the Reality Distortion Field?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    31. Re:Doubly unreliable by eln · · Score: 4, Funny

      So my warranty is safe so long as I only use my phone in the Sahara Desert...got it.

    32. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of OEMs offer Accidental Damage Protection plans (typically 200 - 500) with the purchase of a new computer. These plans cover Drops, Spills, Surges, Kids, etc.

      Apple doesn't offer this.

    33. Re:Doubly unreliable by stdarg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The purpose of the sensors is to keep tabs to see whether you behaved well with the phone. It's a secret device (to most people) that can only be used against you to Apple's advantage. It demonstrates a lack of trust and good faith on the part of Apple.

      Nobody's saying Apple is about to start torturing people... but why is this *not at all* Orwellian, which you're implying?

    34. Re:Doubly unreliable by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1

      So they don't sell iPhones south of Indiana?

    35. Re:Doubly unreliable by OAB_X · · Score: 1

      Yeah, which is not a standard product warranty, it is a pre-paid insurance policy.

      If you want a pre-paid insurance policy that will cover accidental damage, there are many, many companies which will sell you one (likely at a lower price than what an OEM/store will charge).

    36. Re:Doubly unreliable by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

      The purpose of the sensors is to keep tabs to see whether you behaved well with the phone.

      No, it's not. Well, maybe if you desperately stretch the meaning of the phrase 'keep tabs'.

      It's a secret device

      No, it's not.

      that can only be used against you to Apple's advantage.

      Agreed with this bit.

      Nobody's saying Apple is about to start torturing people... but why is this *not at all* Orwellian, which you're implying?

      a.) Mainly because there is nothing Orwellian about it.

      b.) If this were Orwellian, we'd have heard this cry a million times before from a thousand other products.

      c.) It's clear from your post that you're already aware that this claim is a heck of a stretch. Maybe it's time to extend Godwin's law to Orwell.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    37. Re:Doubly unreliable by tagno25 · · Score: 1

      or north of Nebraska

    38. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drat! There goes my plan to use it in most of the inhabitable areas of planet Earth....

    39. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And where is this going to end? Is the device going to keep a permanent record of its GPS coordinates and accelerometer readings? Is Apple going to start recording all the sounds around the phone to make sure that it wasn't used in the commission of a crime?

      It doesn't end - Apple is the reflection of Steve Jobs, and Steve Jobs is a control freak. That's not necessarily a bad thing, so long as everyone that buys Apple products understands that to be the case, and accepts it: So long as you're content to let Apple tell you what's best for you with regards to those things that you buy from them, then you'll be fine, happy and content. And, for the majority of those that buy Apple products, that will be the case.

      Apple has done an admirable job of creating a controlled computing environment, after all. They control the hardware, the OS, and so the software that runs on top of it. There's MUCH to be said for this approach - overall stability is greatly improved, for the most part. The "end user experience" is mostly consistent, which lends itself to ease of use and so, Apple customers are, for the most part happy: All they want is for their computers to "just work", and for the most part, that's what they get.

      Apple has taken this approach, and applied it successfully to the iPod, iTunes, the iPhone - every time they branch out, they use the same methodology: Create an enticing product over which they have complete control, forever, make it fashionable, stylish, *the* thing to have. Apple is cool, after all, and so, too, are those that buy Apple products.

      They've carefully cultivated this image, and gained a loyal, in some cases, fanatical, following.

      And I say, with no cynicism at all - GOOD for them! There's obviously a market for this approach, and they should milk it for as much money as they can.

    40. Re:Doubly unreliable by Myrimos · · Score: 1

      Mac users are giant babbys.

      But...how is babby formed?

      --
      Internet scofflaw
    41. Re:Doubly unreliable by Toonol · · Score: 1

      I think what I admire most about you is that you manage to create the impression that you're saying something useful, while writing vague, fluffy nothingness.

      You couldn't understand what he wrote?

    42. Re:Doubly unreliable by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      He must be doing a very cold censorship.

    43. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      i'd rather not overpay up front

      And yet you buy Apple products.

      *ducks*

    44. Re:Doubly unreliable by pantherace · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amazingly, ASUS laptops purchased in the past two years by my family has included a 1-year accidental damage warranty, (in addition to a standard 2-year (total) warranty) Their prices haven't gone up much if at all since they introduced that, and they've had quality products. (Not to mention, HP seems to contract some of their motherboard production to them. I don't think you can even buy American at all anymore in terms of computers, except maybe high end IBM, and maybe HP.)

      From their site: Covered: Surge, fire, drop, and spill.
      NOT covered (not limited to): scratches and dents, incorrect or inadequate customer installation, lost or stolen, intentional damage, recovery or transfer of data stored on the notebook, damages caused by acts of God or nature.

      It does exclude a number of them bought at retail places like best buy, and you have to register within 60 days. However, having that as a standard warranty is much better than any other I've seen. I haven't had to use it fortunately, and won't get to as it's been more than a year. Additionally, the few times I've had to talk to ASUS' support people, they seemed to have some clue. Contrast that to Leadtek, Seagate, HP (Ironically, the motherboards in the last 8 HPs I ordered at my last job were ASUS made, and no it wasn't the motherboard that was the issue), Dell, Cisco/Linksys or Maxtor that I've talked to, and it's a world of difference. (Among other companies with clue: Gyration, though that was several years ago.)

      (No, I don't have a stake in ASUS, aside from them providing what I feel are for the price probably the best notebook value. Plus, a rapid growth hasn't seemed to have hurt their quality that much. They sold more laptops than Apple last year. It is a pity that the EEE netbooks went up in price, as they went up in size. A 8-9" netbook using Ion would be about the perfect netbook, especially with at trackpoint instead of the trackpads, which take up IMO too much room.)

    45. Re:Doubly unreliable by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, it's not

      He said "to most people", and this is the absolute truth. The vast majority of people have no knowledge that mobile phones are equipped with these sensors, and there's absolutely zero on the packaging or the user documentation to indicate such in almost all cases when it would be trivial to do so, which is prima facie evidence of the manufacturer's intent to conceal the presence of the sensors from their customers. It's just like the practice of putting a Tip-N-Tell inside a crate containing expensive equipment in addition to the ones placed on the outside, to reveal if the shipper has mishandled the package and tried to cover it up - you want to make sure the shipper is honest, but you don't want the shipper to know you're watching him.

      Just the same, I don't necessarily disagree with Apple or anyone else using them (even covertly), as long as they're absolutely reliable - warranty fraud is a real problem, but so is having a legitimate warranty claim denied just because you live in Florida and it got cold one day.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    46. Re:Doubly unreliable by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      So they don't sell the iPhone south of the Mason/Dixon line? The south is pretty much hot and humid all summer, so unless you are supposed to buy a phone that you can only use between Oct and Mar this sensor crap is gonna be screwing a lot of folks down here. I heard it can get pretty muggy on the East coast as well, better not sell them there either.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    47. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should see a therapist? Paranoia can lead to serious health problems.

    48. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People often go for a swim. Many people shower daily. Those are both environments that people commonly go into. I'm not aware of any definition of how portable something marketed as portable must be. That's why manufacturers have operating specs.

      Let me know when someone is actually refused warranty because of this problem. Then you might actually have something to bitch about.

    49. Re:Doubly unreliable by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I was talking about it not being Orwellian, not saying it wasn't dickish.

      Since my previous post about how nobody cried 'Orwellian' before got modded down, I'm just going to bring up one little thing. Blackberries have these 'sensors' too. Some Motorola phones have it and even the Nokia N95 comes complete with one installed. And, as people love to point out, Apple has no marketshare compared to these guys, so we hate them all more now, right? Big ol' Orwellian Nokia. Right?

      I know my attitude alone will get this post modded down. Fine, whatever. I'd just like to make one thing clear. I'm not defending Apple. I just think that before we sharpen our pitchforks and light our torches, we need to be consistent about what we're mad about. If Apple's bad for pointing moisture stickers in their phones, then so is Nokia and the other phone carriers who do that, too. If it's Orwellian to put a tattler in that, fine, it's Orwellian when the other companies do it, too. But if we shake our fists in the air just because it's Apple, we're no better than the fanboys we love to complain about.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    50. Re:Doubly unreliable by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      That's the Bible belt. You don't get Apple users down them thar parts.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    51. Re:Doubly unreliable by lena_10326 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I can't quite figure out if this is flamebait, or if I'm just the only person who can't make a connection between liquid sensors in a consumer electronic device and a dystopian police state.

      You must be the one those users who mods every post they don't understand as flamebait.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    52. Re:Doubly unreliable by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      Although that may hold up for Apple in the USA, I suspect it wouldn't in Europe. I suspect all you would have to do in the UK to have your warranty honoured would be to threaten to go to Trading Standards.

    53. Re:Doubly unreliable by lxs · · Score: 1

      Well the sensor is reliable. The design of the phone that lets enough condensation form on the inside to trip the sensor and possibly ruin the electronics in everyday use is the real problem.

    54. Re:Doubly unreliable by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking about whether it was Orwellian or not, rather I was responding to the comment that it wasn't something that Apple was keeping secret from its customers. Sorry for the confusion.

      I don't really see that Apple's actions could be construed as Orwellian in the least. Comparing the world that Winston Smith lived in to having a covert liquid sensor in your cell phone is just silly. Apple (or Nokia, or RIM, or whoever) using these sensors is no different than Western Digital, Seagate, and every other hard disk manufacturer putting anti-tamper stickers over the cover screws, with the exception that the stickers are obvious, whereas the moisture sensors aren't, and that there appears to be a legitimate concern that the sensors can indicate false positives. You don't see people getting their panties in a bunch about WD's actions though.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    55. Re:Doubly unreliable by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      They really have liquid sensors in them? That seems so... Orwellian. Does that not bother anyone else?

      It doens't bother me. I just put a paper towel or my other hand in front of/under it when I feel it's ready to burst. Or alternatively just point the stream towards some direction other than your laptop.

      O, and keep those movies on an external disk, so that nobody will nose around your files when you have to turn in your laptop for repairs.

      And when using your laptop on your ... lap, be sure to keep it over your knees rather than close to your belly (this last piece of advice is not for the protection of your laptop)

    56. Re:Doubly unreliable by umghhh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      so what you say is as long as it is written in obscured place that the phone records all what you do it is fine that it does. The problem with this is that: they violate people's rights and are happy as the customers want to be cool as you do. They also violate common sense and quality controls as these sensors do not work properly es explained in the article. It does not surprise me all too much after all cool is not far away from fool.

    57. Re:Doubly unreliable by phoenix321 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Talk about a gregarious black-or-white fallacy.

      "Not using the phone where humid air can condensate" is a thinly veiled euphemism for "not taking the phone outside your house, ever".

      This would not be a mobile phone.

      Case in point:
      Summer: Miami, sunshine, excellent weather, 80% humidity, 35 degree Celsius. Houses are air conditioned: 25 degrees, 50% humidity. Perfect weather for the region in summer. Leave the house with your phone in hand and humidity will condense on it instantly.

      Winter: Seattle, sunshine, excellent weather, 30% humidity, -10 degrees Celsius. Houses are heated, 20 degrees, 30% humidity. Perfect weather for the region in winter. Leave the house with the phone in your pocket, stay outside for 2 hours, come back into the house, voila, humidity will condense instantly.

      If you routinely wear glasses, you'd know that humidity is condensing practically everywhere, every time.

      A phone that cannot handle the environment of regular cheap non-waterproof wrist watches is not a mobile phone.

    58. Re:Doubly unreliable by phoenix321 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh you do find some Apple users there. They just keep it IN THE CLOSET.

    59. Re:Doubly unreliable by gzunk · · Score: 1

      I agree with your point, but surely the word you were looking for was egregious - i.e. blatantly bad, rather than gregarious - happy and sociable.

    60. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Promiscuous gay dyslexic meteorologists, unite!

      You have nothing too loose butt you're objectification as targets of easy mockery!

    61. Re:Doubly unreliable by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      OP was clearly referring to _Down and out in Paris and London_, which is what you will be after you try to take your iPhone in for service.

    62. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unability to remove battery friom iPhone is more Orwellian, because you can't be sure it's not communicating with the carrier network (discovering your location).

    63. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Banning deceptive warranty terms is the whole point of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act.

    64. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so what you say is as long as it is written in obscured place that the phone records all what you do it is fine that it does.

      You sound like those people that bitch that they didn't know the specifics about their mortgage or student loans before signing because of the "fine print". Boo-fucking-hoo. If you are dumb enough to sign a legal agreement without reading AND UNDERSTANDING IT, you deserve exactly what you get.

      The problem with this is that: they violate people's rights...

      Quick quiz:

      List the "rights" that Apple is violating in sed agreement. Be specific.

    65. Re:Doubly unreliable by zmollusc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nearly. You can only have your phone there during the day. Don't keep it there overnight as the LCI may be triggered by the dew.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    66. Re:Doubly unreliable by timeOday · · Score: 1
      Here are a few reasons why better manufacturer warranties might not increase the price and are better than aftermarket warranties:

      1) by improving sales, thus amortizing the upfront design / manufacturing costs over more units
      2) aftermarket warranties are more likely to be bought only be people who have some reason to suspect they might "accidentally" need to use it - a high risk pool. You don't want to be in that pool if you're really just a normal user with no intent of abuse or fraud.
      3) aftermarket warranties give the manufacturer little incentive to reduce the number of claims by increasing the quality of the product, because they don't bear the cost. Actions speak louder than words; if you want me to think you build quality, don't quote me a high MTBF, offer me a long warranty.

    67. Re:Doubly unreliable by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I don't know about US law but in the UK goods must be of "reasonable quality" and last a reasonable length of time.

      Courts have consistently ruled that things made for use outdoors must be able to cope with normal weather conditions. The whole point of a mobile phone is that it can be taken outside your house. Obviously you can't expect it to be waterproof but being kept dry inside your pocket is certainly considered normal use.

      So if your iPhone did die from condensation you could probably force Apple or the shop to replace it even if the stickers have turned red. Apple want a red sticker to equal no warranty, but they can't override the Sale of Goods Act.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    68. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So my warranty is safe so long as I only use my phone in the Sahara Desert...got it.

      ... or Cupertino, California.

    69. Re:Doubly unreliable by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

      Cool so if I produce an electronic product, design it to be a regular consumer product and specify that it cannot be used in regular room temperature conditions or any other situation where people will use my product as designed then I can ignore basic consumer rights legislation?
      Fantastic!

    70. Re:Doubly unreliable by moortak · · Score: 1

      The great lakes region is out too, as well as KC and Saint Louis, the rivers jack up the humidity.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    71. Re:Doubly unreliable by TiberiusMonkey · · Score: 1

      They really have liquid sensors in them? That seems so... Orwellian. Does that not bother anyone else?

      This sort of comment is starting to get stupid, I actually read a post elsewhere the other day, from someone stating that Apple is evil and literally as bad as China because the iPhone is a closed environment.

    72. Re:Doubly unreliable by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Apple are not the only company to use liquid sensors. They really started taking off in portable electronics due to the large number of insurance claims made against them. Very easy to brick a phone or mp3 player or laptop by getting it wet so it doesn't look physically damaged.

      It's the few who ruin it for the many.

    73. Re:Doubly unreliable by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Apple aren't a US High School - they're not going to record everything you do via the camera and mic.

    74. Re:Doubly unreliable by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Slashdot, you must be new here.

      Par for the course I'm afraid. I think it's mostly envy on the part of some people, who can't seem to get over the fact that Apple/Google/Microsoft/etc are successful and popular, despite not doing things exactly in line with open source/open development/or whatever way the poster thinks is the only way to do things.

      It does generate some hilarious posts sometimes though, like the "worse than China" ones.

    75. Re:Doubly unreliable by NameIsDavid · · Score: 1

      And the fact that almost nobody suffers from inappropriately-tripped liquid sensors in the wild makes it self-evident that the sensors aren't so sensitive as to not be able to handle the common scenarios that you mention. I haven't heard of a wave of Seattle residents flooding the local Apple stores with concerns. At the same time, I haven't encountered any consumer electronic device that can handle repeated dense condensation while in operation or which doesn't have a related warning. So, having a sensor that will eventually begin to turn red after many cycles of repeated moisture exposure makes sense, if tuned to correlate with actual likelihood of malfunction.

    76. Re:Doubly unreliable by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      People moan about these liquid sensors, but they were around a long time before the iPhone.

    77. Re:Doubly unreliable by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      Then most mobiles are orwellian. Nokia have had them for years.

    78. Re:Doubly unreliable by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      the problem is that the LCI will trip even if the device is turned off

      The problem with condensation is that it gets water into your device even when the device isn't turned on. Actually, condensation is more likely if the device isn't turned on.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    79. Re:Doubly unreliable by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      damages caused by acts of God or nature.

      "Yes, we normally cover fire. However, we have clear indication that this particular fire was a punishment from God, and damages caused by acts of God are not covered."

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    80. Re:Doubly unreliable by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Informative

      And yet you buy Apple products.

      *ducks*

      Apple now produces ducks?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    81. Re:Doubly unreliable by tsa · · Score: 1

      They also told me that when my battery spontaneously combusted.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    82. Re:Doubly unreliable by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      the phone shouldn't be used in humid air where water can condensate

      So I guess both the Pacific Northwest and the UK are screwed.

      And the previous article on Slashdot - http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/02/16/2146227/A-Warming-Planet-Can-Mean-More-Snow

      Means even more humidity.

      Next they'll say you can't operate the phone near a kitchen or bathroom since they contain water. And public restrooms, completely out of the question.

      Gee, what do they teach the kids these days? Can't even tell the difference between "shouldn't be used in humid air where water can condensate" and "shouldn't be used in humid air" ...

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    83. Re:Doubly unreliable by tsa · · Score: 1

      Well, they need to do way instain mother, of course.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    84. Re:Doubly unreliable by therealkevinkretz · · Score: 1

      No. If it is, then so is the sticky tape on seams of disk drives that show they've been taken apart. If your "Orwell" comment is directed at Apple, they're not the only ones - Blackberry devices also have a liquid sensor. 'm sure other devices do also.

    85. Re:Doubly unreliable by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      you think the iphone is the only device with a liquid sensor? there's one in MOST electronic devices (mobile ones anyway).. the reason is there is because the warranty does not cover water damage (dropping in in the sink/toilet)..

      this study seems a little lacking. what was the ambient humidity? how much is required to trip the sensor and how does this compare with other devices? did they take a BBerry and subject it to the same conditions and it passed? what about the location of the one they tested - metal heats/cools faster, so there could be more condensation near the metal parts (headphone jack) how did the one at the other end (near the mic) fare? did all the sensors get triggered?

      does a tripped sensor automatically mean you'll get denied a replacement if something goes wonky?

      Good points - also: did they check for condensated water inside the iPhone?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    86. Re:Doubly unreliable by djrobxx · · Score: 1

      Every cell phone I've owned has had a liquid sensor. It's usually in the battery compartment. The iPhone's is just more exposed, being in the headphone socket.

    87. Re:Doubly unreliable by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      According to some of the other posts on here, it seems like Apple has already covered this in the warranty agreement by specifying that the phone shouldn't be used in humid air where water can condensate.

      well that rules out the British market then...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    88. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in the high desert of Idaho where humidity is usually 30%. My phone was in my front pocket and my body moisture (I wasn't sweating) was enough for the red dot to appear. The phone was fine, but it had the "scarlet letter".

    89. Re:Doubly unreliable by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      why is this *not at all* Orwellian?

      a.) Mainly because there is nothing Orwellian about it.

      Wow, that is a pretty convincing argument you've got there.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    90. Re:Doubly unreliable by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The purpose of the sensors is to keep tabs to see whether you behaved well with the phone. It's a secret device (to most people) that can only be used against you to Apple's advantage. It demonstrates a lack of trust and good faith on the part of Apple.

      Nobody's saying Apple is about to start torturing people... but why is this *not at all* Orwellian, which you're implying?

      The adjective Orwellian describes the situation, idea, or societal condition that George Orwell identified as being destructive to the welfare of a free society.

      A device to combat insurance fraud is not destructive to the welfare of a free society.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    91. Re:Doubly unreliable by snapple)(two · · Score: 0

      I personally believe that the concept of "buyer beware" should be observed more often.

      --
      The requested fragment "#main-articles" doesn't exist, so don't go lookin' for it.
    92. Re:Doubly unreliable by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Apple now produces ducks?

      Only iDucks, if you please...

    93. Re:Doubly unreliable by nxtw · · Score: 1

      Here are the iPhone environmental requirements:

      Operating temperature: 32 to 95 F
      (0 to 35 C)
      Nonoperating temperature: -4 to 113 F
      (-20 to 45 C)
      Relative humidity: 5% to 95% noncondensing
      Maximum operating altitude: 10,000 feet (3000 m)

    94. Re:Doubly unreliable by adolf · · Score: 1

      Since you apparently have to look inside the headphone jack to see it, and most people don't even know that such things as "liquid sensors" even exist, or would be bothered with looking even if they did know, then I guess you're probably right: There aren't throngs of folks at Apple stores questioning things.

      That, however, does not mean there aren't throngs of folks with tripped sensors happily using their phones.

    95. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off apple does not control everything they sell. I can modify my mac os beyond anything 2nd i didnt my Macbook Pro or my iPhone because it was cool, i bought them because they were better than the crap devices i had been buying foryears now. The iPhone is amazing as i utilize it for business quite a bit on a daily basis. So no i didnt buy it because it was the cool thing to have

    96. Re:Doubly unreliable by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Although the credit really should go to the guy I was replying to. My point wouldn't have worked if he hadn't cooperated by making one so weak!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    97. Re:Doubly unreliable by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Really, because I'm pretty sure his argument was a fairly good one, and I don't see how you comment did anything to counter:

      The purpose of the sensors is to keep tabs to see whether you behaved well with the phone. It's a secret device (to most people) that can only be used against you to Apple's advantage. It demonstrates a lack of trust and good faith on the part of Apple.

      Making a weak counterpoint is not excusable, no matter how weak you think the original point was.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    98. Re:Doubly unreliable by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Really, because I'm pretty sure his argument was a fairly good one...

      Wow, really? "It's Orwellian!" "It's Apple, say no more!"

      ...and I don't see how you comment did anything to counter

      There wasn't anything to counter. You also apparently only read one line of my post.

      Making a weak counterpoint is not excusable, no matter how weak you think the original point was.

      "But I think his point wasn't a fairly good one!" Heh.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    99. Re:Doubly unreliable by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      With your clear issues with reading comprehension I doubt you've ever even read 1984. You wouldn't know Orwellian if it smacked you in the face.

      Now grow up and go learn to read and understand the english language.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    100. Re:Doubly unreliable by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      With your clear issues with reading comprehension I doubt you've ever even read 1984.

      That's an interesting thing to say to a guy that isn't comparing a tamper sticker to gov't surveillance.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    101. Re:Doubly unreliable by marjoriereed · · Score: 1

      shouldn't use the macbook at the pool then. we service them as well and it is amazing that people think they aren't electronic

    102. Re:Doubly unreliable by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      "Yes, we normally cover fire. However, this particular damage seems to have been caused by gunfire. From a bear. Which is clearly an act of nature."

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    103. Re:Doubly unreliable by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      It's so manufacturers rightly don't have to cover warranty repairs for your accidental swim in the lake.

      Hey, I resent that. I jumped in that lake on purpose you insensitive clod!

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    104. Re:Doubly unreliable by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      that can only be used against you to Apple's advantage.

      Agreed with this bit.

      I don't even agree with that. The liquid sensor is used almost certainly used to reduce the price of the phone by reducing fraudulent warranty claims.

      As someone who pays for insurance which covers dropping my stuff in water, I don't want to also pay extra for a product just so someone else can rip corporations off.

    105. Re:Doubly unreliable by abhi_beckert · · Score: 1

      He said "to most people", and this is the absolute truth. The vast majority of people have no knowledge that mobile phones are equipped with these sensors

      The vast majority of people don't buy $500+ phones. Where I live people who do usually are aware of these sensors.

      and there's absolutely zero on the packaging or the user documentation to indicate such in almost all cases when it would be trivial to do so, which is prima facie evidence of the manufacturer's intent to conceal the presence of the sensors from their customers.

      Apple's support website clearly states water damage isn't covered and has photos of the sensor, so it is clearly documented. Since when is a box expected to answer every question you could possibly have?

      Just the same, I don't necessarily disagree with Apple or anyone else using them (even covertly), as long as they're absolutely reliable - warranty fraud is a real problem, but so is having a legitimate warranty claim denied just because you live in Florida and it got cold one day.

      If these sensors aren't perfect *and apple's warranty team doesn't take that into account* then you have a relevant argument. but there's no indication of that being the case... On the contrary apple has one of the highest customer satisfaction ratios in the world.

    106. Re:Doubly unreliable by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Sigh, and once again you fail to properly express your point. It would have more properly be done as:

      You wouldn't know Orwellian if it smacked you in the face.

      That's an interesting thing to say to a guy that isn't comparing a tamper sticker to gov't surveillance.

      You see, in the first sentence I was questioning your reading ability. The second sentence is where I asserted that you didn't even know what Orwellian means. When you say "That's an interesting thing to say to a guy that isn't comparing a tamper sticker to gov't surveillance.", you are not indicating that I am unable to read, you are indicating that I don't know what Orwellian means. Therefore the proper sentence to quote is the second one.

      I imagine distinctions this 'subtle' are lost on you though, you are quite possibly the stupidest person on the internet I've encountered today.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    107. Re:Doubly unreliable by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Sigh, and once again you fail to properly express your point... you are not indicating that I am unable to read, you are indicating that I don't know what Orwellian means.

      Hahahaha! I wonder if on the second read you'll catch the silliness of what you just said, here.

      I imagine distinctions this 'subtle' are lost on you though, you are quite possibly the stupidest person on the internet I've encountered today.

      Yeah... you know, that might have stung if you weren't spending all this energy trying to defend a poorly conceived point. This whole theme of reading comprehension is just making this comical.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    108. Re:Doubly unreliable by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      I should have guessed that sentence constructs more complex than "See spot run." would be beyond you. I suppose this is one of those "ignorance is bliss" moments, I'll leave you to wallow in it.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    109. Re:Doubly unreliable by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I appreciate you taking the time to describe to me the benefits of ignorance. The cost of this bliss seems to be very high, though. I mean our conversation about reading comprehension has made you a very unhappy guy!! Bliss is nice and all, but I don't wanna end up as the sort of guy that runs around calling people the stupidest on the internet. Thank you, though, I hope you restore equilibrium. :)

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    110. Re:Doubly unreliable by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at the provider price for a new, unlocked cell phone lately? It could hardly go up more: most are as much as, if not more than, a new desktop/laptop computer! The prices are going up for many providers.

      Providers should give me a new laptop/phone/whatever if I drop it in water because that's what the fucking warranty they provided me says they'd do: I pay the monthly added fee for the damage warranty, and if my device is damaged, they will replace or repair it. There is no mention of a little pink sticker.

      I had them pull that nonsense on me - telling me I couldn't get it replaced because I was "abusive" to the phone, which put it outside the bounds of the country - all on account of moisture (sticker activation was not the cause of the failure: a button physically stopped working/didn't click). So I carefully cut out a piece of paper and replaced the sticker, then took it to antoher Verizon store: problem solved.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    111. Re:Doubly unreliable by v1 · · Score: 1

      trip the sensor and possibly ruin the electronics

      So true. Funny they didn't mention the level of humidity nor Apple's stated humidity limits.

      Equally entertaining how many people are saying that Apple is voiding the warranty based on the LSI being tripped as unfair. Apple also doesn't warranty it when you run it over with your truck, but that's not specifically spelled out in the warranty, so I guess they think that too should be covered?

      I tell them, look closer, Apple's stated warranty specifically does not cover "accidental damage /abuse". This is abuse. Exposing electronics to repeated condensation is abuse, plain and simple. As you said, the sensor is doing its job. It's not an "I dropped it in the lake" sensor. It's an "I exposed it to liquid, heavy condensation, or extended high humidity" sensor. And it works just fine.

      I can think of half a dozen electronics with a "dew sensor" in them. (very common in digital cameras) They will specifically refuse to power on (which would cause damage) if they sense too high of a humidity or condensation. You have to dry the unit out before it will turn on.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    112. Re:Doubly unreliable by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      have you looked at the provider price for a new, unlocked cell phone lately?

      yes i just bought one.

      most are as much as, if not more than, a new desktop/laptop computer!

      i am not an expert on the manufacturing process of cell phones or the cost of the components that go into them, but this is what i know: building something smaller cost more, and cell phones have to pay both hardware and software license fees to make use of things like 3G, google apps, etc in their phones.

      Providers should give me a new laptop/phone/whatever if I drop it in water because that's what the fucking warranty they provided me says they'd do: I pay the monthly added fee for the damage warranty, and if my device is damaged, they will replace or repair it. There is no mention of a little pink sticker.

      if they wouldn't cover your phone when moisture sensor was tripped, then no, you weren't paying for that. did you read what you signed?

      almost all warranties are not worth it. you are better off taking you chances in the long run even if you eat it now and then on some devices. apple's applecare is the one exception to that (not my opinion, google on it and you'll see it written over and over).

    113. Re:Doubly unreliable by joemck · · Score: 1

      other than you dunking or getting the PC weight

      So now the use of a scale voids the warranty?

      But seriously, that's one heck of a typo to make...

    114. Re:Doubly unreliable by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I meant getting the thing wet I really have no idea how the word weight got in there.

      Must be a bug in my software.

    115. Re:Doubly unreliable by Meski · · Score: 1

      And tool

    116. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What rights are being violated? The right to be free from a commercial entity selling you a product that you willingly buy?

    117. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the fact that almost nobody suffers from inappropriately-tripped liquid sensors in the wild makes it self-evident that the sensors aren't so sensitive as to not be able to handle the common scenarios that you mention.

      I've seen lots of complaints on Slashdot about people not getting service, but I'm not sure what "almost nobody" means.

    118. Re:Doubly unreliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The vast majority of people don't buy $500+ phones.

      1. These sensors aren't just on "$500+ phones" - just about every phone manufactuered has one.
      2. Why are you talking about $500 phones in a story about the iPhone? The 32 gig 3GS is $300.

      Since when is a box expected to answer every question you could possibly have?

      Since when is it not important to mention something that could easily void your warranty?

      Apple's support website clearly states water damage isn't covered and has photos of the sensor

      It clearly says spills and submersion. Neither of which applies to condensation in humid areas.

      Do you keep your head burried deep in your ass because it's a comfortable position for you, or is it for the wamrth, or what?

    119. Re:Doubly unreliable by iamacat · · Score: 1

      It could also be the opposite - aftermarket warranties are bought by people who can not easily afford a replacement and thus tend to be more careful with all of their expensive stuff, since they don't constantly think which of it is or is not still covered.

  2. Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    LCI are just a way for companies to worm out of actually delivering on warranties.

    1. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      They know the sensors don't work. Fortunately for phone companies, they fail in favor of the companies' interests.

    2. Re:Scam by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah mod that up. The liquid sensors don't protect the devices in any way, other than to let you know you got the thing wet at some point. Many warranties are basically written to rule out the common things that would break a phone. It's especially annoying when you're paying a monthly fee for the warranty that adds up to the price of the phone or more in a year anyway, the least they could do is replace the thing when you break it even if you did drop it in your gin and tonic. If they make you agree that's not covered, fine, but then their sensors better be rock solid reliable. False positives are unacceptable.

    3. Re:Scam by biryokumaru · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Solution:

      Don't

      Buy

      Warranties

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    4. Re:Scam by SpeZek · · Score: 1

      Solution: Don't Buy Warranties

      The sad thing is, you didn't used to have to. Things came with 3,5,10, even lifetime warranties -- even electronics. Nowadays every consumer electronics company either wants to nickle-and-dime you with "insurance", or doesn't care for the expense and offers as little as a 30 day warranty.

      That said, the problem is a lot worse in the normal consumer market than in the enthusiast one. An HP computer bought from Best Buy will cost you $350 for a three year warranty (that sucks), but most motherboards will have a 3 year warranty, hard drives have 5, some vendors of RAM and PSU's have lifetime warranties.

    5. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got around the sensors that some phones have near the battery with the a good excuse. Neither phone failed because it had ever got wet anyway but the sensor was red.

      "Oh, that was me. When the phone stopped working I read the troubleshooting section of the manual. It says to make sure the battery contacts were clean. I used a little bit of rubbing alcohol on a q-tip to clean them. I must have got a little on that red square thing your talking about. Next time I'll just bring it in to you guys to clean them."

      On the flip side. My daughters phone keys were dying and although the sensor was not tripped, the phone tech took it apart and pointed out the brown sticky crap behind the keyboard membrane that resembled cola syrup and it was not covered, fair enough.

    6. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most companies will honour the warranties on their components, even if you bought the computer preassembled.

    7. Re:Scam by Kinky+Bass+Junk · · Score: 1

      So what does this study mean for those that have been stung by the warranty "violation" of the liquid sensors? Mine were set off due to standard Australian humidity, lost me a lot of money.

      --
      Anonymous Coward
    8. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, my phone insurance replaced my phone no questions asked. Who covers your phone? Maybe they suck. My insurance actually covers dropping my phone in a lake. Why would you pay a monthly fee for a warranty that doesn't cover anything?

    9. Re:Scam by Cjstone · · Score: 1

      You have to watch out for "Lifetime Warranties," however. The definition of "lifetime warranty" is typically the "lifetime of the product on shelves," and many tech manufacturers switch SKUs every two years or so. That's still better than the one-year warranty you'll get with a laptop you buy at Best Buy, but not nearly as good as the term "lifetime warranty" would imply.

    10. Re:Scam by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      My concern as well, 70% humidity here in central florida is not uncommon and walking from that into a cold room can cause enough problems.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    11. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have insurance and just buy a replacement phone used on Ebay when mine breaks. Any phone except the most recent smartphones typically sell for under $50. My last two were actually "new" phones that people got replaced with insurance ;). Most phone insurance plans have a monthly fee of $3-8 and a $50 deductible.
      General note about buying used phones. Call the carrier and verify the IMEI or the ESN is clear for activation. If a dead beat skipped out on their contract, the phone will be flagged and the carrier will not activate it until the balance is paid. Don't trust the seller. Call the carrier yourself with the number and ask. Most sellers will just say, "It works fine, I'm selling because I switched to a different carrier." They may think it should work but if there was a balance when they switched, you'll be stick with a phone only good for parts.

    12. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're actually a way of stopping scammers claiming on warranties when they've trashed the product themselves.

      Which does several things, but one of them is keeping the cost more reasonable for the rest of us who aren't trying insurance fraud.

    13. Re:Scam by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Warranties are like insurance. You're paying some money for the feeling of safety. There are times when its worth it- when the replacement cost of the device is too high for you to comfortably pay. Buying one for something as cheap as a phone is stupid, but I can see it on larger purchases- say a car.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    14. Re:Scam by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      Psh, car insurance is for sissies!

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    15. Re:Scam by compro01 · · Score: 1

      There are the rare few who offer Tilley-like warranties. Read the fine print.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    16. Re:Scam by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      It can be even worse than that. Sometimes the term 'lifetime' is defined as the lifetime of that particular item. Thus, if your product dies, it is by definition past it's lifetime; whether that is 5 years after purchase, or 2 days.

    17. Re:Scam by Carnivore · · Score: 1

      Indeed. When I needed a new battery for my cell phone, I noticed that the LCI had tripped. I checked the LCI on the new battery when I bought it, and it was already tripped. I asked for another one, but it seems that every battery in the store had a tripped LCI. The CSRs brushed it off. Luckily, I never had to find out if it would void the warranty.

    18. Re:Scam by broken_chaos · · Score: 1

      I've actually had a red liquid sensor turn back to white on one occasion... No idea why. I even got the device (an iPod touch) replaced under warranty some months after the sensor was originally tripped (for a probably, though I can't say for certain, unrelated problem with the speaker) -- they even looked straight down the headphone port (after I'd checked it myself, verifying that I'd have an easy time getting it fixed/replaced).

    19. Re:Scam by KClaisse · · Score: 1

      Not every company is out to ruin you financially with expensive warranties. Many companies just ask that you fill out an information card and send it in. My Corsair flash voyager has a lifetime warranty on it which covers anything! I have sent it in for replacement (for free) 4 times now because I snapped off the USB end accidentally. And a couple years ago I called up Logitech and told them my G5 laser mouse's feet were getting worn down and slow and asked where I could buy replacement feet. They sent me a brand new mouse and didn't ask for the old one back. Granted that was probably just a very very generous representative.

      My point is, not all companies are out to get you with warranties. In my experience I've only had once company shaft me with a replacement item, and that was ViewSonic because they wanted me to send in my monitor and wait a few weeks for a new one. Shipping was expensive and I need a monitor to work. Your vastly exaggerated claims that "Every consumer electronics company either wants to nickle-and-dime you" are completely wrong. But as this article is about phones and not normal consumer devices I will say this. Yes there are insurance fees for phones that are damaged in a way that is not covered by standard warranties, but that is almost always just water damage. User fault is not a manufacturing defect. Do you consider user error to be something covered under a warranty?

      If you sold someone your car and they crashed it, would you pay for the damages since it was YOUR car first?

      The fact is most companies are well within reason to not cover damage done by the user. And most of those companies will replace any defective items free of charge. In fact, I can't think of any company that charges you for warranties. Not counting those in-store extended warranties, but just a standard warranty.

      The issue here though is that the phone itself is indicating that it has had water damage when exposed to differing climates. It wouldn't be too hard to prove that the ring was set off without exposure to water. Taking apart the device and inspecting its components should show that no damage had actually been done and that water had not entered into the device. I always put tape over my water damage indicator stickers when I get a new phone. Even if the phone is completely covered in water inside, as long as the stickers aren't red you can get a new phone. I once left my phone in the yard and the sprinklers got it. When I found it the screen was completely busted and there was no sound when It turned on. The tape had preserved the stickers perfectly, so after I dried it out with a hairdryer I took it over to Verizon, who happily replaced it with a new phone.

      Oh damn I rambled. My bad.

    20. Re:Scam by Corbets · · Score: 1

      Actually, here in Switzerland, they *do* replace it if you drop your iPhone in your G&T. I don't know why, but I walked in to the apple store to have a macbook speaker replaced and joked about them fixing my iPhone (the back of the case was cracked, very clearly from me dropping it). I was told, "sure, no problem". I was a bit surprised, explained how I had physically damaged the device, and the apple guy (I won't ever call them Geniuses!) told me the following.

      "As long as it's under warranty, and if you bought it here in Switzerland, we'll replace it even if you drop it in the bathtub."

      I have no idea why, but at that point, I stopped looking the gift horse in the mouth.

    21. Re:Scam by deniable · · Score: 1

      standard Australian humidity,

      Which standard? Far North Queensland in wet season, Tasmania in winter or Marble Bar in summer?

    22. Re:Scam by colenski · · Score: 1

      Ah, grasshopper. While a 3 year warranty may have been standard for a microwave oven in times of yore, back in the 80's, when you bought an Amiga, a 1040ST, an Apple III, or a PC Jr, the warranty was a scant 3 months. 90 days was the standard for electronics for a *long* time.

    23. Re:Scam by SpeZek · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be too hard to prove that the ring was set off without exposure to water. Taking apart the device and inspecting its components should show that no damage had actually been done and that water had not entered into the device.

      I always put tape over my water damage indicator stickers when I get a new phone. Even if the phone is completely covered in water inside, as long as the stickers aren't red you can get a new phone. I once left my phone in the yard and the sprinklers got it. When I found it the screen was completely busted and there was no sound when It turned on. The tape had preserved the stickers perfectly, so after I dried it out with a hairdryer I took it over to Verizon, who happily replaced it with a new phone.

      ...did you read that to yourself after you wrote it?

    24. Re:Scam by colenski · · Score: 1

      Also: My GF is a concierge in Apple. She has told me that techs *will* swap out iPhones even if the sensors are red, on a case-by-case basis, if the problem in question is not obviously a moisture problem. Really, the whole point of the sensors is to give the techs *some clue* about what the problem could be, *not* to unilaterally deny warranty claims. Apple really does kick ass on warranty and non-warranty claims. I am typing this on a beat-to-shit macbook that has been fixed numerous times *for free* by Apple, out of warranty. And before you ask, no it is not because of my relationship with the aforementioned GF. No one at the Apple store knows who I am, I just walk in with it under my arm.

    25. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in the dong of America. Go eat a dick.

    26. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet! You guys have great cheese too.

    27. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My anecdotes somewhat contradict yours: My experience at the Genius Bar has depended on whether or not I have had Applecare for a given item. With it, I have received great treatment, without, crap. All told, (so far, at least) it would have been cheapest not get any Applecare on either of the two Mac laptops I've bought and paid all repair expenses out of pocket.

    28. Re:Scam by daveime · · Score: 1

      Anyone who is willing to pay double bubble for their hardware just to have the Apple logo on it, probably doesn't need the insurance anyway. Money to burn and all that. Just saying ...

    29. Re:Scam by cbope · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention G&T. My wife accidentally dropped her Nokia E90 in G&T last summer (slipped out of her shirt pocket when she leaned over to pick something up). It completely submerged for a couple seconds. After removing it from the liquid, I opened the battery cover and removed the battery immediately. Then I soaked up as much liquid as I could and gently but firmly tapped the phone on a semi-hard surface to try to remove the liquid that had gotten inside. I left it opened with the battery out and cover removed for several hours, at least until I could not detect any more liquid inside the device.

      To my surprise, after reinstalling the battery, the phone worked. The small outer display was a bit funky for a couple months, showing a bit of rainbow and discoloration, but the large internal display was not affected at all. Eventually the outer display cleared itself and is now 95% normal. The phone is still perfectly usable, I had expected problems with the keypad due to the sugars in the liquid but so far no issues. The phone is still in normal use today.

      This is actually one reason why I will never buy a phone with a non-removable battery, a la iPhone. Accidental liquid ingress inside the device will almost certainly ruin it since there is no way to quickly and effectively remove power from the device.

    30. Re:Scam by beelsebob · · Score: 1

      News flash, warranties aren't insurance. If you want to be insured against being an idiot, take out insurance.

    31. Re:Scam by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Maybe Apple sometimes is great on warranty, but I know of two cases where they refused to look at iPods because they had scratches or other mars that were simply the result of using them normally and keeping them in a pocket with keys. So YMMV. Guess that's why they installed motion sensors, now they can record spikes in the acceleration when devices are dropped...

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    32. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we make a special case of this post and mark it Score: 6?

    33. Re:Scam by mad_minstrel · · Score: 1

      In Europe you don't buy warranties as an option. For electronics one year is the legal requirement, but many things have 2 or 3 year warranties. At best you can not buy an extension. IANAL.

      --
      May the source be with you.
    34. Re:Scam by Kharny · · Score: 1

      logitech rocks on warranty, 5 years on all mice and keyboards, and they replace practically anything if you are nice( customer service ppl get a lot of freedom to exchange devices). with mice "feet" they generally replace just the feet, unless they don't have those as seperate replacement parts.

      ex-logitech support person myself, and I buy all mice, keyboards and speakers from them ever since.

      --
      Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
    35. Re:Scam by KClaisse · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be too hard to prove that the ring was set off without exposure to water. Taking apart the device and inspecting its components should show that no damage had actually been done and that water had not entered into the device.

      I always put tape over my water damage indicator stickers when I get a new phone. Even if the phone is completely covered in water inside, as long as the stickers aren't red you can get a new phone. I once left my phone in the yard and the sprinklers got it. When I found it the screen was completely busted and there was no sound when It turned on. The tape had preserved the stickers perfectly, so after I dried it out with a hairdryer I took it over to Verizon, who happily replaced it with a new phone.

      ...did you read that to yourself after you wrote it?

      Yes, and even reading it now it is perfectly fine and exactly as I intended. Maybe you should read it again or at least post what you think is wrong so that I can correct your erroneous way of thinking. :)

    36. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Urm, European here, we have implied warranties for all products. You know, actual consumer protection? It'll be interesting to see how this plays out, Poland being part of the EU and all.

    37. Re:Scam by yacc143 · · Score: 1

      Well, technically in the EU there is such a thing like an implied warranty by law.

      It's not perfect because only in the first 6 months the company has to prove that
      the item was not defective, afterwards you have to prove that it was defective (as
      in hidden defect) at the time of purchase, so it basically turns out that serious
      companies usually offer a voluntary 2 years warranty, and only ver shaddy companies tend
      to offer less or only the warranty they are forced to give you by law.

      So I'm always really shocked when people talk about 30 days warranties ;)

    38. Re:Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Apple always gets high ratings for customer satisfaction? Does that include after sales services? If so then I don't know what everybody is complaining about! Either they never owned an Apple product and never experienced first hand thier customer service or they -according to those studies- are the few unlucky ones

      now I own a second generation 17" PowerBook G4 1.3Ghz it haz all it original parts it's used as my main computer and I don't take much care of it... It's still working fine except for the slowness.

      Now I live in a 3rd world country where there isn't much consumer rights -we have more important things we need to fix first- with luxury items like Apple, Sony and anything else like Mercs and Pateks Phillippe watches the dealers will charge you an arm and a leg to do minor repars... Anything under $10k dollars will usually get replaced by the owner at will because they are to stupid and they most likey didn't work hard for the money again remember I live in a 3rd world country so you should know where and how they got that money...

      The dealers don't give a fuck about honesty and custmer service. the concept of after sales doesn't exist here! When I get the chance to travel and experience real service and respect from not only high end luxury companies but cheap places similar to wallmart I almost cry! Most of you seem take things for granted and just complian for the sake of complaining! You don't know how most of the world lives and works! Stop complaining it makes you sound like spoilt brats! If you don't like the actions of company X don't buy thier products! Fuckin simple! If someone else buys and likes it what's the fucking problem?! Some of you seem to want to force thier idiology on others! Not everyone cares about FOSS! Not everyone has the luxury of a good education to enlighten them about these things! Not everyone has the luxury you're complain about just think about that next time

      P.S. Sorry for the rant

    39. Re:Scam by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Nowadays every consumer electronics company either wants to nickle-and-dime you with "insurance", or doesn't care for the expense and offers as little as a 30 day warranty.

      IIRC, California law requires that all consumer products costing more than a few bucks have a minimum of a 90 day warranty. I don't remember the exact dollar amount (maybe $100), and I can't seem to find the relevant law, but I remember reading it at some point in the past. There's also a minimum 60-day "fitness for the intended purpose" implied warranty in California. A 30 day warranty is almost certainly violating laws in California, and probably in several other states.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    40. Re:Scam by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Yeah mod that up. The liquid sensors don't protect the devices in any way,

      Yeah, I also blame Apple that they aren't hooked up to a teleporting device that transports them to a safe place when they fall in the toilet.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    41. Re:Scam by Brianwa · · Score: 1

      My new phone came with a tripped sensor on the battery. Another one millimeters away on the inside of the phone is not tripped. Weird.

    42. Re:Scam by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Heh, same thing here (Europe). I really loved what we were allowed to do to achieve customer satisfaction, and have been a loyal customer myself ever since.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  3. REDUNDANCY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [quote]defined environmental requirements defined by apple[/quote]
    hope that worked.

    also, redundant sentence is redundant.

    1. Re:REDUNDANCY! by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      You gotta use HTML kinda tags, not BBCode kinda tags. Also, the preview button lets you, you know, preview it.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:REDUNDANCY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also, redundant sentence is redundant.

      Stamp out redundancy and do away with it!

    3. Re:REDUNDANCY! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      I can live with that. Someone wake me up when the redundant sentence is not redundant.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  4. non-operating temperature range... by bsDaemon · · Score: 4, Funny

    The operating temperatures of 0 to 35C are completely held within the non-operating range of -4 to 45C. Sounds like a trick way of saying the phone isn't actually meant to work.

    1. Re:non-operating temperature range... by mystikkman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Err those are the safe temperatures for a switched off phone, not a range for which the phone must not be operated.

    2. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And?

      This has nothing to do whatsoever with actually operating the phone. Simple existence in these conditions, even with the battery removed, could result in a voided warranty.

    3. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 1

      The specs say differently:

      Environmental requirements

      • Operating temperature: 32 to 95 F
        (0 to 35 C)
      • Nonoperating temperature: -4 to 113 F
        (-20 to 45 C)
      • Relative humidity: 5% to 95% noncondensing
      • Maximum operating altitude: 10,000 feet (3000 m)

            --- Mr. DOS

    4. Re:non-operating temperature range... by zygotic+mitosis · · Score: 1
      I sense a paradox. How can the operating range coincide fully with the nonoperational range??

      /pedant

    5. Re:non-operating temperature range... by WizardX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The specs say differently:

      Environmental requirements

      Operating temperature: 32 to 95 F
      (0 to 35 C)
      Nonoperating temperature: -4 to 113 F
      (-20 to 45 C)
      Relative humidity: 5% to 95% noncondensing
      Maximum operating altitude: 10,000 feet (3000 m)

      You have got to be kidding me!!!

      *Minimum* operating temp of 32 F?!?!?!

      How the F can they sell this phone in northern climates? I live in WI and in Feb I will frequently go outside on a nice day to take a conf call and get some fresh air. A nice day being, at least, in the upper 20's.

      Seriously dude, WTF?

      /First /. post in like 5 years
      //Apple makes some very nice products, but their arrogance is huge.
      ///Jobs was born is SW WI.

    6. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 2, Funny

      Welcome to California. Apparently, none of our Northernisms (I'm Canadian, eh) are welcome Cupertino-wise. That is pretty mind-bogglingly high even for there, though - it does snow there sometimes.

      (Wow, I dragged you out to reply to my humble post? Sorry! ;) )

            --- Mr. DOS

    7. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the Nokia N900 user's guide:

      Do not store the device in high or cold temperatyre. High temperatures can shorten the life of electronic devices, damage batteries, and warp or melt certain plastics. When the device warms to its normal temperature from a cold temperature, moisture can form inside the device and damage electronic circuit boards.

      Avoid extreme temperatures. Always try to keep the battery between 59F and 77F (15C and 25C). Extreme temperatures reduce the capacity and lifetime of the battery. A device with a hot or cold battery may not work temporarily. Battery performance is particularly limited in temperatures well below freezing.

      Perhaps Finnish winters aren't as frigid as I was led to believe.

    8. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The phone is going to be in your pocket most of the time. It's not going to instantly hit the outdoor temperature even if you do pull it out and talk for a while, as it's going to be next to your warm ear or hands. Those aren't environmental temperatures, they are device temperatures.

    9. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't spread lies. Jobs was born in San Francisco.

    10. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Z34107 · · Score: 2, Informative

      (Wow, I dragged you out to reply to my humble post? Sorry! ;) )

      Also a 'sconsinite. In rural parts the internet is often located outdoors, so during the winter months it's quite a trek to have our slashdot posts delivered.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    11. Re:non-operating temperature range... by deniable · · Score: 1

      Better yet, we've had days over 35C here this week. iPhone shutdown time kids.

    12. Re:non-operating temperature range... by MadTinfoilHatter · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Finnish winters aren't as frigid as I was led to believe.

      Hmmm... (looks at thermometer). A nice brisk -24 C. I think I'll defrost my freezer today. Just toss the stuff out on the balcony, and I'm set.

      (Posting from Helsinki, Finland)

    13. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The temp range is limited by the ICs inside. Those temp specs are valid for the consumer temperature range (0 C to 70 C) compensating for internal temperature variations (35 C in this case) They could move to industrial ICs/components which are rated from -40 C to 85 C however the iphone would cost 3x to 10x more. If an IC isn't rated at cold temps it can do strange things, like turn off, or (in the case of power ICs) go unstable and damage you phone (though good Power ICs have protection modes to prevent that these days - lets hope apple uses good ICs)

      I make consumer and industrial power ICs and we make great margins on the industrial products because people pay through the nose for the extra temp range..

      AC to keep myself safe at work

    14. Re:non-operating temperature range... by weicco · · Score: 1

      Tampere, Finland -24 C and blowing like hell. It was -34,8 C yesterday in Keitele, Finland where I used to live before I moved to Tampere. And yes, my Nokia works just fine and isn't even red! :)

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    15. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Since they also specify non-condensing humidity they are likely to be able to dismiss any claims anyway.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    16. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Nokias are probably tested in the sauna.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    17. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Toonol · · Score: 1

      You're not supposed to turn the iPhone on if the ambient temperature is over 95 F? That seems laughably restrictive.

    18. Re:non-operating temperature range... by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      Yes, and here's proof.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    19. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have an iPod Touch that I keep in my car 99% of the time in Canada where -30C weather is common. The touchscreen isn't so great when it's cold, but otherwise works fine and returns to full normality with more heat. The battery is still fine as well - lithium ion is pretty durable in cold conditions.

      I expect the spinning disk models would have a much tougher time since anything that moves groans and creaks in extreme cold. Their spec is more of a CYA statement than real-world measurements.

      Also, a phone is likely to spend most of its time in your pocket near an ample source of heat. Even when you're talking on it, it'll have a face on one side, a hand on the other, and a busy processor, radio, and discharging battery to keep itself warm. Having the internals go below freezing would be a rare occurrance.

    20. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the Nokia N900 user's guide:

      Avoid extreme temperatures. Always try to keep the battery between 59F and 77F (15C and 25C). Extreme temperatures reduce the capacity and lifetime of the battery. A device with a hot or cold battery may not work temporarily. Battery performance is particularly limited in temperatures well below freezing.

      Perhaps Finnish winters aren't as frigid as I was led to believe.

      Still, there's a difference between 'if you want to get the most out of this battery, keep it within this temperature range' and 'If you go out on a cold day you void the warranty'.

    21. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it's -20C (-4F) here in Helsinki now :) We have maybe 2-3 months with temperatures above 15C/59F. So obviously these kind of poor warranties are not going to be legal here. It's pretty funny that Nokia (a Finnish company) has this kind of text in their warranty.

    22. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And it regularly hits 40 degrees Celsius where I live in sydney. What are we not allowed to use our phones on hot or cold days? Just one more reason for me to not buy an Iphone.

    23. Re:non-operating temperature range... by cbope · · Score: 1

      Actually they are, at least this winter is. I'm typing this as it's -4 F / -20 C outside today in Helsinki.

      However, taking a phone outside in a warm pocket and making a few minutes call in these temps is not an issue. Taking the above temp as an example, the phone internals are NOT at that temp immediately when you walk outside or take it out of your warm(er) pocket. My estimate it that it would take a minimum of 15-20 minutes of exposure to ambient temp for the phone internally to start approaching that temp. That means it's not in your warm(er) pocket and not in your warm(er) hands, but completely out in the open and not in contact with anything of a warmer temp that would slow it cooling down to ambient temperature.

      Also keep in mind that the chemical reaction in the battery is unlikely to allow the device to cool to ambient temperatures as long at it's still providing power to the device (e.g. not empty). And during a call, the battery warms even more and sometimes the battery cover can become slightly warm to the touch after long calls due to increased power draw from the battery and heat dissipation from the radio chips.

      Back to the OP, they are clearly operating the phone outside of design specifications (well below rated minimum operating temp). Of course they are going to trip the LCIs. No news here really.

    24. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      How the F can they sell this phone in northern climates? I live in WI and in Feb I will frequently go outside on a nice day to take a conf call and get some fresh air. A nice day being, at least, in the upper 20's.

      .

      So leave the phone in your pants pocket, where it's probably much warmer, and will not be subject to condensation when you bring it back inside. Or put it in there before you go inside. Use a headset if you need to call somebody outside. Quite frankly, I find it uncomfortable to use a phone outside in such temperatures, as that generally means taking off a glove as well.

      I think in most cases, people will not trigger the sensors - if you're using it, you're holding it sandwiched between your face and your hand, and the chips are producing heat. Walk inside, and it's not totally frigid, though I might avoid doing it just to be nice to my phone - it is, after all, a piece of sensitive electronics, not a dog's chew toy. If you're not using it, it's probably securely stowed in a coat pocket or purse, where the temperature and humidity change will be much more gradual, and not subject to condensation.

      I worked for a company that made embedded systems for telecommunications; they typically had to be more tolerant of temperature variation than most consumer products (say -5C to 65C, roughly). As part of our qualification, we'd try to push the limits to see just how hot and cold we could get our product before it would fail to know just how much margin we had (we always tested with at least 5C of margin). Pushing the high temperature range, it was pretty easy to get many ICs to their maximum junction temperature due to power dissipation (and also because we weren't allowed to have fans on our products, as such mechanical components are liable to fail). However, in the low range, I'm not aware of anything ever going wrong before we hit -40C, which was our arbitrary testing limit. But most of the chips we used were only guaranteed to work down to 0C; we just had to take on all the risk that the product might fail below that temperature.

      You can bet Apple's buying standard commercial temperature range parts (many parts aren't even available with larger temperature ranges), and they don't want to take the risk if the parts don't work beyond their specified temperatures.

    25. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the case of internal temperature of a phone in your pants pocket reaching closer to zero... I'd be mostly concerned the ability to reproduce in the future. There's more irreplaceable loosely connected equipment in that general area, yet it tends to stay well aboze freezing point... unless you're seriously underclothed.

      Just speaking as a Finn. It's nicely windy -30 C out there now, -40 in the north.

    26. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What this says is completely different from what Apple says.
      Nokia is telling you that your running time will suck if it's cold because of the battery technology. There's not much they can do about it, except put a battery heater inside that runs off the battery.
      It doesn't say you're voiding the warranty by using it at other temperatures. At least it doesn't in the part you quoted where they don't even specify what high or cold temperature is.

    27. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet my n900 is working fine in Oulu (finland) through the winter. And I can use it with gloves!

    28. Re:non-operating temperature range... by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      You never left the phone behind in your car, did you?

      And you never noticed that girls keep phones in their handbags. A handbag freely carried in blowing -15C wind will reach freezing temperatures quite fast. In that environment even writing a text message is enough exposure to cool the entire phone well below freezing point.

      And people do that all the time.

    29. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a N900 and live in Norway. The phone has been to -20C a few times this year (external pocket of my sport clothes). In those cases, the battery life was shorter but the phone is still working. What is not working is the SIM card, it is impossible to make a phone call by -20C, an error message warn you of SIM card problems.

      From my experience, Nokia phones are the most reliable in nordic Winter.

    30. Re:non-operating temperature range... by weicco · · Score: 1

      Great idea! I think I try what my old Nokia thinks about sauna this evening. Let's see if it can stand 100 C :)

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    31. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that defrosting idea sounds like a good plan until you try it. I was going to do exactly that yesterday and realised the balcony door won't open -- 80 cm of snow is a surprisingly effective doorstop.

    32. Re:non-operating temperature range... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Finnish winters aren't as frigid as I was led to believe.

      The battery has mass, which means it has thermal mass, which means that when you take it out of your pocket in freezing conditions, the battery doesn't immediately plunge to below-zero temperatures. These problems apply to all devices with the same battery technology, which is to say, basically all cellular telephones and most other complex electronic devices which run from rechargeable batteries including GPS, laptops, etc etc.

      In addition, the battery generates heat during use, which further increases the runtime in freezing conditions.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most consumer electronics have -10C or -20C as the lower limit when not operating, 0C for operating, and "5% to 95% noncondensing" humidity is normal too. Go to HP's web site for one of its laptops (I just picked the first one on the list):

      Temperature Operating 32 to 95 F (0 to 35 C) (not writing optical)
      41 to 95 F (5 to 35 C) (writing optical)
      Non-operating –4 to 140 F (–20 to 60 C)
      Relative Humidity Operating 10% to 90%, non-condensing
      Non-operating 5% to 95%, 101.6 F (38.7 C) maximum wet bulb temperature

      the batteries are:
      Temperature Operating (Charging) 32 to 113 F (0 to 45 C)
      Operating (Discharging) 14 to 140 F (–10 to 60 C)
      Non-operating –4 to 140 F (–20 to 60 C)

      The AC Adapter is much narrower for humidity for some reason:

      Environmental Design Operating temperature 32 to 104 F (0 to 40 C)
      Non-operating (storage) temperature –4 to 149 F (–20 to 65 C)
      Altitude 0 to 10,000 ft (0 to 3,048 m)
      Humidity 20% to 80%
      Storage Humidity 10% to 90%

      Li-ion batteries are particularly prone to damage if the temperature drops below freezing. It's not Apple's fault, it's the nature of the technology itself.

      You can get away with using these devices in colder temperatures (I'm in Canada), but they last longer and function better if you keep them in an inside pocket close to your body warmth, and don't leave them exposed in, say, -20C or -30C for long. When I take my laptop to and from work I keep it in a case that is insulated and relatively well sealed. When I get to work I leave it in the case to let it warm up before turning it on so that it warms up slowly and limits the airflow. The last thing you should do is let the fan pump plenty of warm air through a cold unit like that.

      It's basic physics and chemistry constraining the "problem" here, and if you understand what happens it isn't that hard to mitigate. Taking a phone call in cold temperatures is not a big deal -- there is some thermal inertia that will keep the temperatures ok for a while, and the heat from operation will heat it up too -- just don't make it a 20 minute call :-)

      The people in the article are grumbling about the warranty implications if the condensation trips the liquid sensors. To that I say: if there's enough condensation to trip the liquid sensors, then maybe that's a sign you should be more careful about keeping the unit warmer when outside. -11C for an hour sitting in a box? That's just stupid. Keep it in an inside pocket.

    34. Re:non-operating temperature range... by cynyr · · Score: 1

      The catch here is the "noncondensing" part. From my limited photography experience, we'd bag up cameras that had been out in the winter outside with as little air as possible, then transfer them to the refrigerator and then finally the counter and only after they were at ambient temp would the bag get opened and the camera removed. This is of course a bit unreasonable for a device meant to go in your pocket, but i'm willing to bet that if it was done, you could do it without tripping the sensor. You need to keep the temperature of your phone above the dew point temp of the air to avoid condensing. Apple just didn't design the phone to handle rapid temp swings. Not thats outside the normal for consumer electronics.

      I'm willing to bet though that your cheek is warmer than 20 when you go outside. which is why you don't have any problems, also your hand is covering the other side, keeping your phone nice and warm. I really wonder if the phone left out at -4 for say ~24 hours is going to make it or if the LCD is going to freeze.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    35. Re:non-operating temperature range... by weicco · · Score: 1

      Dang! My expiriment failed miserably. First, I forgot that our new sauna only gets to about 80 C. Second, I couldn't find my old phone and didn't want to test this with company phone. Well, maybe next time :)

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    36. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If LCD screens freeze, they can break. Isn't this obvious? I'm not sure why anyone would be surprised that a device with an LCD screen doesn't have an operating temperature below freezing.

    37. Re:non-operating temperature range... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      *Minimum* operating temp of 32 F?!?!?!

      How the F can they sell this phone in northern climates? I live in WI and in Feb I will frequently go outside on a nice day to take a conf call and get some fresh air. A nice day being, at least, in the upper 20's.

      This most likely has to do with the battery. At cold temperatures many batteries simply stop working. Last time I was snowboarding I pulled my iPhone out to take a picture. It was 0 or below that day and the phone flashed low battery and shut down before I could get a picture snapped. In the lodge the phone warmed back up and worked fine.

    38. Re:non-operating temperature range... by nxtw · · Score: 1

      *Minimum* operating temp of 32 F?!?!?!

      LCD screens don't really like the cold.

    39. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm lucky this season, but most winters it's considerably colder at this point in the year and I've got to FedEx my packets down to an Internet uplink in New York or they'll freeze and clog up the tubes.

      The latency's a bitch...

            --- Mr. DOS

    40. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The user guide isn't a warranty and it's stating something most of us already know: battery efficiency and lifespan decline when stored outside optimum conditions.

    41. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ///Jobs was born is SW WI.

      Unless the Dairy State was doing a bunch of annexing since I last looked, he wasn't. From the font of all knowledge: "Jobs was born in San Francisco and was adopted by Paul and Clara (née Hagopian) Jobs of Mountain View"

      His biological sister (Mona Simpson*) was born in Wisconsin, but in Green Bay, which is only "SW WI" if you're from Door County.

      *Who is married to a writer for The Simpsons, not-so-coincidentally.

    42. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is standard form - many integrated circuits are only specified to work at or above freezing (0C/32F). That's not to say they won't function at lower temperatures, but the manufacturers cannot guarantee that they will operate correctly at colder temperatures.

      Also - do you leave your phone outside for an extended period and still expect it to work? I've had many cameras and phones where the LCD would not function if it got below a certain temperature. The specification if for the phone - not the environment.

    43. Re:non-operating temperature range... by adah · · Score: 1

      You have got to be kidding me!!!

      *Minimum* operating temp of 32 F?!?!?!

      How the F can they sell this phone in northern climates? I live in WI and in Feb I will frequently go outside on a nice day to take a conf call and get some fresh air. A nice day being, at least, in the upper 20's.

      Seriously dude, WTF?

      Do you use laptops outside in such weather? My laptop has a narrower range. iPhone is more a computer than a phone. Even a Nokia phone can only do 14 F.

    44. Re:non-operating temperature range... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Charging a lithium-polymer battery under 0C can pretty much destroy them (greatly reduce their capacities). Maybe that's why...

  5. Condensation? by sp332 · · Score: 1

    Taking something made of metal indoors and outdoors with a big temperature gradient is just *begging* for humidity to condense on it.

    1. Re:Condensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhm.. yes, and the OTHER part of the 'defined operating conditions' is the humidity range, which is typically for electronics listed as 5%-95% _NON_CONDENSING_

      So as much as it sucks, guess what, the sensor is accurately recording that the phone's been outside of operational specs.

    2. Re:Condensation? by tverbeek · · Score: 0, Troll

      There's an undocumented clause in the warranty that says it's invalidated if the user is an idiot who don't know how to properly care for a piece of electronics. Like letting it cool to -11C before exposing it to humid air at about 20C, instead of keeping the damn thing reasonably warm in your pocket. Sounds like the "liquid sensors" are effectively enforcing that clause as well.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    3. Re:Condensation? by Entropius · · Score: 0

      Funny how this doesn't seem to bother properly designed electronics.

      I have a cheapie digital SLR that I take in and out all the time in wildly varying humidity and temperature conditions, and it does just fine. Sometimes condensation forms on the lens, and that means your pictures suck. But it doesn't break the device. If Olympus can figure out how to do this with a device that has a sensitive CMOS sensor exposed to air, why can't we get a cell phone that won't break when put in the same room as a bathtub?

    4. Re:Condensation? by marcansoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't break. The article isn't about breaking, it's about the environmental change triggering the sensors. The ramifications are that Apple may/will refuse warranty service if they have been triggered, even if the failure was not a consequence of the humidity/condensation.

      So you take your phone out on a cold day, bring it back in, then three months later it dies of natural causes. Apple refuses to fix it because some condensation occurred three months prior.

      Although it's rare for a device to die just from some slight condensation, it's technically outside the specification. The way the warranty is worded, though, it would appear that they can only refuse to service devices for actual damage caused by the out-of-spec environment, not just because the device ever was in that environment. However, the burden of proving that the condensation didn't cause the issue is probably on you.

    5. Re:Condensation? by mysidia · · Score: 4, Informative

      The sensor trips, even if the phone is not being operated (e.g. it's powered off) when these conditions are encountered.

    6. Re:Condensation? by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      So as much as it sucks, guess what, the sensor is accurately recording that the phone's been outside of operational specs.

      And yet they continue to sell such devices in said area. You don't see any disconnect here?

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    7. Re:Condensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except -- I think the issue here isn't the air's relative humidity, but the temperature of the device itself.

    8. Re:Condensation? by BriggsBU · · Score: 1

      Problem being that there is no way for you to prove that the liquid exposure occurred 3mo ago versus yesterday. So they say, "LDI is positive for liquid damage, no warranty." You say "That happened 3mo ago and is unrelated." They say to prove it, and you can't so they win.

    9. Re:Condensation? by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      If the phone is sold anywhere in a tropical region, say Rio de Janeiro, the phone severely violates even the non-operational specs a few minutes after the shipping box is unloaded off the cargo plane.

      Operational specs that don't fit the advertised use of a "mobile" phone are not the customer's problem, they are fraud.

    10. Re:Condensation? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      That is also covered - the humidity requirement applies to the phone when it is on and off.

    11. Re:Condensation? by cynyr · · Score: 1

      is it non-condensing in the air(rain)? or on the device(because it's below dew-point)? or the air is really below dew-point? They really should be making a portable device able to swing from 0 at 5%(after the device is at ambient temp) to 95@95% with no ill effects, or the operating range needs to be redefined, IMO, as the device cannot operate through the whole of it's temperature range.

      I wonder if a small amount of clearcoat over the sensor would stop it from turning red.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    12. Re:Condensation? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      The sensor trips, even if the phone is not being operated (e.g. it's powered off) when these conditions are encountered.

      So? Does the water magically not condensate when the phone is off?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    13. Re:Condensation? by BillX · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, the test they constructed was designed to mimic the warm/cool cycles the phone would experience on its way to retail and after you drop it off for warranty repairs:

      The first "freezing" in the way of the client to the salon operator, then the phone goes on the shelf in the warehouse, where is "thawed". Nastpnie kolejne mroenie” w drodze z salonu do centrali firmy kurierskiej i znowu rozmraanie” na póce w magazynie. Then another "freezing" in the way of living to the headquarters by courier service, and again, "defrost" on a shelf in the store. Na koniec trzecie mroenie” w drodze z centrali kurierskiej do serwisu Regenersis. At the end of the third "freezing" on the road from headquarters to the courier service Regenersis.

      So what they suggest is it is entirely possible to be denied warranty service for "red dots", even if the customer never operated it outside the recommended operating conditions, due to excursions during shipping to the repair facility. Whether the recommended operating conditions are at all sane for real-world usage (i.e. "mobile" phone, "fitness for purpose" warranty clause), or whether the ROC correlate 1:1 to the terms of the warranty are other kettles of fish entirely.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  6. Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Tsu-na-mi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As anyone who wears glasses could probably tell you, if you go outside for a while, then come back inside (mimic the conditions of the 'experiment'), the glasses are highly likely to fog up with condensation. Is this not a liquid?

    Sounds to me like the sensors are working just fine.

    --
    I've built up so much character I have an alter-ego
    1. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by tprox · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's the point of the article. The sensors are working fine, but they trigger even when operating the iPhone well within the specified temperatures. In essence, using the iPhone as intended may still void your warranty.

    2. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Jhon · · Score: 1

      The problem is it's tripping a sensor within the documented parameters... Which -- as anyone who wears glasses could probably tell you (providing they used those classes to RTFA), void the warranty.

    3. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      As anyone who wears glasses could probably tell you, if you go outside for a while, then come back inside (mimic the conditions of the 'experiment'), the glasses are highly likely to fog up with condensation. Is this not a liquid?

      Sounds to me like the sensors are working just fine.

      No they aren't working properly.

      The Apple warranty http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/02/20/0118230 on page 2 eliminates warranty claims if the iphone has suffered liquid spills or submersion.

      Yet the sensors trip via simple humidity changes, not unlike those the phone would experience in daily use in northern climates.

      The sensors are essentially exposed to the outside of the phone, one in the ear-phone jack, and another in the 30 pin connector.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by plover · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Non-condensing. It's right here: http://www.apple.com/iphone/specs.html

      Environmental requirements

              * Operating temperature: 32 to 95 F (0 to 35 C)
              * Nonoperating temperature: -4 to 113 F (-20 to 45 C)
              * Relative humidity: 5% to 95% noncondensing
              * Maximum operating altitude: 10,000 feet (3000 m)

      You have to obey them all, all the time. The sensor is simply just another component that might fail if you exceed these parameters. And it sounds like pretty convincing proof that you were in condensation conditions if the sensor fails by turning red.

      --
      John
    5. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to take care of electronic items and not expose them to conditions of condensation.

      Not doing that is - aside from being retarded - something which rightly voids the warranty.

    6. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by marcansoft · · Score: 2, Informative

      The iPhone might be well within the specified temperature range, but not within the specified humidity range.

      Relative humidity: 5% to 95% noncondensing

      Emphasis mine. Turns out condensation is outside the environmental specifications.

    7. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by rcw-home · · Score: 1

      You have to obey them all, all the time.

      You left out one other environmental requirement that must be obeyed.

    8. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Where can you find noncondensing conditions exactly?

      I live in the tropics, I go for a motorbike ride with my phone in my pocket for a couple of hours - 33 degrees and stupidly high levels of humidity. Stop all nice and stinky at my usual coffee place with the air-conditioner running inside at 18C - instant condensation. Not just on metal items - even your skin can become clammy for a brief time.

      That said - we buy our phones outright in this part of the world. The manufacturer warranties normally run anywhere from 1 to 3 years - and we like it that way :-) We tend to buy Nokia / LG / Sony Ericsson rather than Apple though.

    9. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by icebike · · Score: 1

      There is nothing about condensation in the warranty. Did you follow the URL?

      It talks about Spills and Submersion.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      A portable phone isn't fit for its purpose if you can't take it outside in humid states. It is meant to be a portable device.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implied_warranty

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    11. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Then why are they selling in in a country where the environmental specifications can't be reasonably met for half of the year?

      What if the spec said, "proper operation only guaranteed in hard vacuum", in small print?

    12. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      The sensors are working fine, but they trigger even when operating the iPhone well within the specified temperatures. In essence, using the iPhone as intended may still void your warranty.

      That assumes that tripping the the sensors voids the warranty. That's not necessarily the case.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    13. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      You have to take care of electronic items and not expose them to conditions of condensation.

      How do you suggest to do it in regions where it is naturally humid and cold in winter?

    14. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Where can you find noncondensing conditions exactly?

      I think it means you are supposed to avoid rapid temperature changes.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    15. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Italics are yours.

    16. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by plover · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm just reading Apple's conditions straight off their web page, I'm not telling you how you can follow them or that you should violate them.

      As far as I can tell, the sensor is working perfectly. These guys handled the phone as if they were deliberately trying to create condensation, succeeded at creating condensation, and are whining that they got caught by a moisture detector, as if condensation isn't moisture.

      The part where I sympathize with them hasn't come yet.

      But being both an Apple loather and a slightly embarrassed owner of an iPhone, I can still blame Apple for this. If they'd make the damn battery user replaceable, they could put the moisture sensor inside the battery compartment like every other phone manufacturer. Condensation wouldn't be a problem. But because of their f*cking insistence on gluing shut every useful physical and digital feature, they uncaringly expose their customers to poorly conceived side effects.

      As cool as half the iPhone is, the other half sucks out loud. I'll never buy another Apple product.

      --
      John
    17. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then this machine was clearly meant to be run not on earth, as condensation is a given wherever there is water.
      hell, breathing on it will cause condensation

    18. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by sjames · · Score: 1

      The conditions in the ROOM are non-condensing. Apparently the environment INSIDE the welded shut case is what becomes condensing.

      Producing a personal electronic device whose typical use is to take it with you everywhere that cannot withstand something as simple and commobn as going inside on a winter day is incredibly consumer hostile. I suppose the next version will have spring loaded razor blades that shoot out if you hurt it's feelings.

    19. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by epp_b · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Environmental requirements * Operating temperature: 32 to 95 F (0 to 35 C)

      So, does Apple just automatically void Canadian warranties or do they actually expect no one here to use an iPhone outside from October through March?

    20. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      The specified humidity, however, is labeled as "non condensing". It's outside of your warranty's coverage, just not because of the line these guys are focusing on.

    21. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      The moisture sensors are in the headphones jack (exposed to the outside) and in the dock connector (exposed to the outside). Those are probably affected by the conditions outside the phone much more than those inside the phone (which is also hardly welded shut - it's not water or airproof).

    22. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So... where exactly do you get any place where you NEVER have noncondensing humidity? I mean hell, I live in Colorado and it's dry as a bone here most of the time, and my glasses still fog up. Putting a clause in a warranty that essentially says "You're not covered if you actually use this device as advertised and intended" is immoral, and I believe illegal in many places.

    23. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Unless there was fog or dew in the room, then that is apparently not the case.

      The back goes on, then they use an ultrasonic welder to fuse the plastic at the join together. That would be "welded shut" as opposed to being secured by glue, screws, or snaps. I didn't say "hermetically sealed" because it isn't by any means airtight.

    24. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      Considering iPhones can be disassembled (not particularly easily, but certainly not requiring cracking plastic seals apart), I have a hard time believing it's welded shut. My old 2G certainly wasn't (it was held on by annoying metal clips, but no welds). I haven't taken apart my 3G, but the guides out there don't hint at stuff being welded shut. The plastic mounts onto the metal frame/rim, it's not an all-plastic construction.

    25. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by srussia · · Score: 1

      Where can you find noncondensing conditions exactly?

      I live in the tropics, I go for a motorbike ride with my phone in my pocket for a couple of hours - 33 degrees and stupidly high levels of humidity. Stop all nice and stinky at my usual coffee place with the air-conditioner running inside at 18C - instant condensation. Not just on metal items - even your skin can become clammy for a brief time.

      >

      Actually, the condensation would happen when you leave the cold place and get outdoors, i.e., all your cold gear causes the external humidity to condense.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    26. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I guess you could get a special case made. I don't see why people are so outraged at Apple over the operating conditions. Do you really expect Apple to make the iPhone sealed from the environment just for the minority of people who have probably already adapted to the problems of living in such a climate? How do you cope with other electronic devices? Any other normal phone will have similar problems.

    27. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      So opening the phone box somewhere in the UK, Brazil, Cote d'Ivoire instantly voids any and all warranties, since they usually have 90-100% humidity weather?

      Just to get that straight: is it possible to have a mobile phone voided in warranty when a mobile phone user leaves the air conditioned house in Brazil, any time of year? What does "mobile" mean then?

    28. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      OK, let's accept for a while that the Canadian winter is special. Unlike the winter in Finland, Russia, Northern China where a billion people live altogether, but no, it's special.

      Would you please tell me, where on Earth I can routinely find a non-condensing environment outside an air-conditioned house?

      Brazil? No, 100% humidity, tropical.
      Africa? No, it's either tropical (100% humidity) or desert region (-5C at night, 45C at noon, humidity will condense at night)
      UK? 100% humidity, rain, constantly.

      What environment is un-special enough to be fully entitled to Apple's operating conditions and warranty?

      Should we switch off our mobile phones before we leave the house? Or just move to Idaho?

    29. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I have a better idea!

      Why not add the clause to the warranty that it's voided if a phone is used in the oxygen-containing atmosphere? You know, oxygen causes rust, damages liquid crystal displays, and so on. So it's fair!

      You just need to keep your iPhone in a nice neutral N2 atmosphere.

    30. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Rapid temperature changes. You can operate and store the phone in high humidity but are meant to protect it if you suddenly move into a cold environment.

      It's not unique to phones. Almost every tape-based camera has the same requirement since condensation affects the pinch rollers.

      All mobile phones have these sensors now, but just like the iPod battery issue, this is getting blown up out of proportion because it is Apple. Maybe the sensors are in a bad location, being exposed to the air, and they should redesign it with internal ones.

      The other issue is that people have said it is a *guaranteed* warranty failure, when there is no indication that it is the case - they are a guide to assist in the diagnosis of the life of the phone, not the only thing the repair techs will look at. Perhaps they can tell if normal humidity has triggered them vs an actual dunking (or the sensors gradually return to white after a while as part of their design - ie, they are red for a long enough to be useful during a genuine warranty repair). Who knows.

      I think it is a little too exposed in the headphone socket - it should be deeper inside. The one in the dock connector I think is more covered.

    31. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah these environmental requirements are totally reasonable. By the way, What is non-condensing humidity? I'll let your ridiculous comment slide if you can explain to me what it is and how you can determine it a-priori. (Hint its a vaguely defined made up word to eliminate liability)

      1. Determine the droplet size limit on the moisture sensor (void warranty?)
      2. Measure temperature and humidity in any warmer environment you might step (Great additions to your portable gadgets!)
      3. Pull out your trusty psychometric chart (Maybe there's an app for that?) Determine if, without heat transfer, your phone's old temperature is a super saturated environment with the new ambient humidity. (RH>=1)
      4. If No then proceed, else
      5. Determine rate of energy transport vs water vapor transport and condensation. Does your device heat faster than water vapor condenses? This is a non-trivial problem. Solve coupled fluid,energy, and species continuity for water vapor. THERE'S NOT AN APP FOR THAT!
      6. If condensation > heat transfer, seal the device and wait for it to warm up.
      7. do while T_next_step > T_present
      8. Yeah totally reasonable...

      These requirements are impossible to follow and you are an idiot for suggesting they are not.

    32. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by cynyr · · Score: 1

      walk to the buss stop ~1 mile away at 0F(inspec) with phone in hand so you can browse the web/playgame/etc. Now get on warm bus, watch phone condense. get off bus, walk ~1 mile to work, go inside, watch phone condense and LCI turn red. Same thing as the experiment.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    33. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Environmental requirements

      * Operating temperature: 32 to 95 F (0 to 35 C)
      * Nonoperating temperature: -4 to 113 F (-20 to 45 C)
      * Relative humidity: 5% to 95% noncondensing
      * Maximum operating altitude: 10,000 feet (3000 m)

      You have to obey them all, all the time.

      Unfortunately for iPhone users, Steve Jobs' rectum is the one and only location on Earth that fits those specs 100% of the time!

    34. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Didn't you mean "A portable phone isn't fit for its purpose if you can't leave it outside in the freezing cold for an hour, then take it into a warm room"?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    35. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      There is nothing about spills and submersions in the warranty or the Apple Care Terms either. Nor about smashing your phone with a sledgehammer BTW. It does mention "damage caused by accident, abuse, misuse, flood, fire, earthquake or other external causes; (e) [to] damage caused by operating the product outside the permitted or intended uses described by Apple".

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    36. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by icebike · · Score: 1

      There is nothing about spills and submersions in the warranty

      Wrong.

      Read the pdf at the url I posted. Page 2. Near the top.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    37. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Since it only has a couple of buttons and two connectors, and no removable hardware or user-serviceable parts, then yes, I expect Apple to keep things pretty well sealed up.

      It would be rather bloody easy.

    38. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little bit of silicone sealant or hot melt glue during manufacturing could easily make the connectors themselves watertight. The only fault then would be from corrosion on the contact terminals themselves rather than water/moisture intruding into the case via air gaps on and around the connectors. Now before arguing about some other aspects, speakers and touch panels can work fine through water-proof membranes without adversely affecting quality. Also on small portable devices you shouldn't need the connectors to act as vents either, the casing should be thin or thermally conductive enough to keep things from overheating. If the device was designed right, it would be reasonable to expect it to be as water resistant as most wristwatches. If I can get a $30 watch that's 30m watertight, then why not for a $300 gizmo?

      It looks pretty, but if they designed it to be more practical - internal moisture sensors wouldn't trip unless the device was exposed to some degree of water pressure. That means getting it wet or putting it somewhere humid wouldn't bother it (unless terminals corrode - which is usually easy to fix by repeated plugging-unplugging), but it would be expected for the seals to fail if you went swimming with it.

      My guess is that the reason Apple doesn't make the devices to a higher spec of water-resistance is they don't expect that degree of QC to be upheld by the factories in China. Otherwise such devices could be made to occasionally be dunked or get wet with no problems.

    39. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by GryMor · · Score: 1

      You can get condensation in a non-condensing environment on surfaces that are substantially colder than the environment.

      --
      Realities just a bunch of bits.
    40. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      How do you suggest to do it in regions where it is naturally humid and cold in winter?

      Apparently if you live near a northern seaboard, you shouldn't buy an Apple phone because they say it's not designed for those conditions. I'm just guessing Nokia has thought through these issues due to their non-Mediterranean climate. "Designed by Apple in California" is right on the iPhone label.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    41. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      I don't care what you think you posted (which actually was a link to this discussion) - I checked the actual Warranty at Apple.com.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    42. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by icebike · · Score: 1

      This warranty does not apply: (a) to consumable parts, such as batteries, or protective
      coatings designed to diminish over time unless failure has occurred due to a defect in
      materials or workmanship; (b) to cosmetic damage, including but not limited to
      scratches, dents, and broken plastic on ports; (c) to damage caused by use with non-
      Apple products; (d) to damage caused by accident, abuse, misuse, liquid spill or
      submersion,
      flood, fire, earthquake or other external causes; (e) to damage caused by
      operating the product outside the permitted or intended uses described by Apple; ...

      http://images.apple.com/legal/warranty/docs/iPhone_3GS_warranty.pdf

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    43. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Apparently if you live near a northern seaboard, you shouldn't buy an Apple phone because they say it's not designed for those conditions.

      I wouldn't actually have a problem with that, if iPhones weren't sold in those countries in the first place - i.e. if you had to have one shipped overseas to get it. Then, it is naturally up to you to ensure that it can properly operate in common environment of your country. If it is sold in a shop across the street, though, this doesn't fly anymore, regardless of what the label says.

    44. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering how well capacitive touchscreens work with gloves, it's not that far-fetched an idea...

    45. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      So, once again an Apple fanboi is telling customers that it is their responsibility to work around shortcomings in Apple's product.

      I have two words for that: Fsck off.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    46. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Most manufactures don't weatherproof their phones, so I don't see what this has to do with being a "fanboi". Those that do make weatherproof devices usually consider them specialty items. It would be nice if all phones were weatherproofed, but it costs money. So unless there is a high enough demand for it, it probably won't happen.

    47. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure. I guess it all depends on what all the other manufactures' specs are. If Apple is way out of line compared to them, for no good reason, then perhaps this issue should be looked into.

    48. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Apple will one day weatherproof their phones, but it probably won't be until the rest of the industry starts to. It may seem easy to you, but it's still money to them.

      I don't see what the big deal is. If you live in these parts and Apple complains about the LCIs, then you can prove to them that they are faulty thanks to this article. If they refuse, then it's time for a law suit, I guess. But why don't we wait until that actually happens before going on our little rants?

    49. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      What kind of weatherproofing is needed to avoid damaging condensation in normal usage patterns in normal Northern Hemisphere winter weather?

      It's a mobile phone. If I can't carry it in my pocket when going outside, it's shoddily manufactured. And now you're going to tell the world that it is up to us to prove to Apple that their sensors are oversensitive?

      Yes, you are a fanboi. You'd eat shit and exclaim how wonderful it tastes if Jobs told you to.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    50. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are a fanboi. You'd eat shit and exclaim how wonderful it tastes if Jobs told you to.

      Sorry, but this just shows that you're a troll or an idiot.

      Name one major brand that weatherproofs all their phones and you might have a point.

    51. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Again with the false dilemma and the goal post moving. The issue is not whether or not other manufacturers weatherproof their phones; the issue is that Apple has been known to refuse warranties due to the LCIs indicating the phone got wet, and it now being obvious that the LCIs give false positives in normal Northwestern European winter weather. If the iPhone can't handle normal weather above 60 degrees latitude, that is a shortcoming in the product.

      And as for your fanboism, your posting history says it all. No matter what the criticism, we find you on Slashdot parroting the official Apple line.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    52. Re:Uhhhhh... Condensation? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      the issue is that Apple has been known to refuse warranties due to the LCIs indicating the phone got wet

      Maybe I missed that part in the article. Do you mind posting a link to such a case?

      And as for your fanboism, your posting history says it all. No matter what the criticism, we find you on Slashdot parroting the official Apple line.

      There's an official line? Apple are far from perfect, but I do agree with the way they do many things. Yes, I am an apologist, I guess, if only because there is so much BS spouted around here. If that's all it takes to be a "fanboi", then I guess I am. And I guess it's time for you to head off back to 4chan.

  7. simple solution by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Move to California.

    1. Re:simple solution by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Move to California.

      Yeah, but maybe you should wait until June. El Niño his doing his thing here this winter.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    2. Re:simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I live in California. My iPhone has NEVER seen a DROP of water, the LCI is red and one of it's speakers doesn't work. Too bad for me, apple tells me to pike-off when I went in the store even though there is NO GOOD REASON for it to not be working properly.

    3. Re:simple solution by Alien1024 · · Score: 1

      Sure, from October to March. But for summer, migrate to Scotland, or you will violate the upper limit.

    4. Re:simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except I have a co-worker in the Bay Area and she had just this problem. Iphone started to drop signal to the point that she no longer could do anything (it would show full bars, but would never call out or get internet). She took it to the store and they told her the sensor was tripped and that it would cost $200 to fix. She says it has never gotten wet or rained on. She was so pissed off at apple and AT&T she payed the ETF and went to verizon.

  8. Only -20C?? by onosson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wow - why do they even sell them here in Canada, then? Am I not supposed to take it outside below -20C? That's almost every night for half the winter! In fact, though, I've had my iPod Touch (1st Gen) for about 3 years, and I take and *use* it outdoors in -30 to -20 temperatures all the time - no problem. It's actually survived a dunking in the bathtub, too.

    --
    ? syntax error
    1. Re:Only -20C?? by biryokumaru · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Likewise, in much of the US the specification of 35 C is much too low for use during a large portion of the summer.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:Only -20C?? by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      True enough - when I get in my car in the summer (southwestern US) and it easily is above115F outside, it's probably a lovely 130F+ inside. A phone with an operating range that low is kinda pointless.

      Seriously though - shouldn't whatever board certifies these devices at least require them to be certified for a reasonable temperature range?

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    3. Re:Only -20C?? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Likewise, in much of the US the specification of 35 C is much too low for use during a large portion of the summer.

      Are you trying to claim that the climate in the rest of the US doesn't mirror that of Cupertino?

      Hmm... sounds like you need a little touch-up therapy from Jedi Jobs...

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Only -20C?? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      no consumer-grade electronic device is rated for those conditions. would you put your TV outside at night? your computer? same thing. just because it's a phone doesn't mean it's any more resistant to harsh conditions than any other electronics device.

    5. Re:Only -20C?? by onosson · · Score: 1

      I was just a little surprised, as -20 C is not really much of an extreme temperature for much of my country during the winter. -40 yes, but not -20. I often travel by bus with my laptop in a backpack, and it's not unusual to be outside in lower temperatures than that for periods of time waiting for the bus. So far, low temperatures have never been a cause for concern as far as electronics are concerned - laptops, audio devices, cell phones, cameras etc.

      --
      ? syntax error
    6. Re:Only -20C?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      no consumer-grade electronic device is rated for those conditions. would you put your TV outside at night? your computer? same thing. just because it's a phone doesn't mean it's any more resistant to harsh conditions than any other electronics device.

      Oh, come on. Computers and TVs are used inside, but it's intrinsic to a mobile phone that you carry it with you. You're expected to build it so that it can handle ordinary weather conditions wherever you sell it.

      Which is what they have done anyway. The iPhone's been out for years, and I haven't heard of news of mass phone deaths due to heat waves.

    7. Re:Only -20C?? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      In fact, it's hardly unreasonable to expect mobile devices like phones and media players and even laptops to be more resistant to harsh conditions than devices that are clearly designed for indoor use such as a regular computer and a TV. For instance, I think it's terribly annoying that you're not supposed to use many of the mobile devices in the rain. And all devices should be able to deal with the "normal" range of outside temperatures of the country they're sold in, or be clearly marked as summer/indoor use only.

      And of course they do work at extreme temperatures, otherwise there would've been a huge consumer outcry, I guess the manufacturers just can't (or are too cheap to) prove that they work.

      Incidently, my computer is self-heating.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    8. Re:Only -20C?? by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should be alright as long as you play some movies on the phone before putting it in your pocket, and play movies on the phone while it's in your pocket before going inside.

      The problem is when the partial pressure of H2O exceeds the dew point. If you raise the temperature by moving into a new volume of air, then you get the ppH2O of the new volume of air, which is instantly cooled to near the temperature of the device, possibly crossing the dew point and causing condensation. If you raise the temperature of the existing air within the device through, say, its own heating, by taxing the processor, then the ppH2O will not change, and in fact will move even further from the dew point (since the max ppH2O is higher with higher temperature)

      If you're unwilling to preheat your phone every time you move from a cold environment to a warm environment, the I suggest that you simply don't have the dedication required to operate a fine piece of apple electronics. Your expectation that a $2k device intended for everyday use should be more robust to common, everyday activities is unfounded and unreasonable.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:Only -20C?? by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      regardless of what you expect, it doesn't change the fact that the iphone is made from cheap consumer grade electronics that have no special protection against heat, cold or moisture. this is no different than any other phone, laptop or any other so-called "portable" device ... unless they specifically advertise as such (and then you pay 2x+).

      i have no doubt i could take my laptop, my TV, my game console out in freezing temperatures and they'd work fine ... would it increase their chance of failure over time? probably.

  9. Condensation? by smd75 · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much condensation has to do with it.
    Its freezing here in chicago and walking from the bus to the lincoln park conservatory, my camera gets cold enough that it instantly condenses when i get inside the conservatory.

    When changing temperatures that drastically, I cant help but wonder the non liquid stress those indicators get

    --
    Im a troll because I disagree with you.
  10. Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a confirmed and committed Apple loather, I have to say HA!

    But I can also read. The line directly after the temperature limits says "Relative humidity: 5% to 95% noncondensing"

    Noncondensing. Even the damned summary claims "only the condensing water could have been in contact with the sensor."

    Goodness, look at that, saying "the iPhone has been used under the defined environmental requirements defined by Apple" is like saying it's some big conspiracy that running over it with a car breaks it, as long as it's been within -20 and +45C. You can't just pick ONE environmental limit to stay within and damn all the rest.

    Noncondensing, people.

    1. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by khallow · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can get condensation without exceeding the relative humidity limit (incidentally what other computer has a humidity limit?). Just put a very cold iPod in a warm pants pocket. As long as the iPod is colder than the dew point, then you get condensation.

    2. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The environment the phone was in was noncondensing. The environment IN the phone was condensing but how is the consumer to control that?

      Consumer devices need to be built to withstand the normal environments they will be used in. Surprise, people sometimes come into a warm building from the cold outside.

      If Apple gave half a crap about their users, they'd spring for the penny it would cost to shoot the insides with a bit of waterproofing spray rather than warranty void excuses before welding the back on.

    3. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      If Apple gave half a crap about their users, they'd spring for the penny it would cost to shoot the insides with a bit of waterproofing spray rather than warranty void excuses before welding the back on.

      The problem isn't that the phone will break from these it is the fact that it will trip the sensors. The problem is, these indicator things are terrible indicators of a problem. While I can see the point in reducing claims from someone who went swimming with their iPhone, someone who got their iPhone slightly damp months ago and comes in with a different problem still can't use their warranty.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      Consumer devices need to be built to withstand the normal environments they will be used in. Surprise, people sometimes come into a warm building from the cold outside.

      Quite simply; put the phone in a warmer spot like a pants pocket for a few minutes before going inside. Keep the phone in a purse for a few minutes so it can warm up gradually.

      This is how the indicators work. Get them slightly damp by condensation enough time and they may indicate water. That is enough moisture to damage electronics. The Indicators are not failing; they are working as designed.

    5. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by sjames · · Score: 1

      I agree that it shouldn't be a problem at all. I'm just saying that even if Apple is concerned there are perfectly good technical solution and no need to screw people over.

      Most electronic devices can survive immersion and work again once dried out.

    6. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The humidity rating as given for the iPhone IS the range of the noncondensing humidity. As in, the percentage of moisture in the air that is non-condensed.

      noncondensing means the "condensing portion" is excluded.

      The fact that some condensation is occuring does not mean you are outside the operational humidity specification.

      If they didn't say noncondensing, then it would mean the humidity exposure would have to be considered 100% when condensation is occuring.

      By saying "condensation", in fact, the humidity can be 95% or less and considered within specification, even as condensation is occuring.

    7. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by sjames · · Score: 1

      It is perhaps enough water to damage crappy electronics. Decent electronics will be fine.

      The way fragile cellphones are going, I'm just waiting for the steel carrying cases with built-in velvet pillows, climate control system and active damping. It'll need to have wheels and a significant suspension system, of course.

      Simply going inside on a cold day should NEVER even be a consideration for voiding the warranty on a consumer device.

      Going outside on a hot humid day shouldn't be a big deal either, but would probably have the same effect on the iPhone.

      I agree that the sensors are working as designed. They're supposed to provide an excuse to get out of providing warranty service and they do exactly that!

    8. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      You cannot get condensation without violating the clause that says "NONCONDENSING" next to the humidity range of 5%-95%. It doesn't matter if you're inside the 5 - 95 range, the water condensed and therefore is outside of their specifications. I don't agree with their doing this, but it's pretty damned clear that they'd be enforcing exactly the line GP referred to.

    9. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the point the GP was making is that noncondensing conditions are downright impossible to maintain in daily use. Which means that the wording of the specification is unreasonable.

    10. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by khallow · · Score: 1

      You cannot get condensation without violating the clause that says "NONCONDENSING" next to the humidity range of 5%-95%.

      Is that what that means? Can they prove that's what they meant in court? I doubt it. If they really mean that the phone shouldn't ever get condensation on itself, then they should say that. Because there is a reasonable interpretation of this that doesn't include condensation from normal usage. Namely, stuff like leaving your iPod outside on a foggy night or on top of a humidifier.

    11. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      incidentally what other computer has a humidity limit?

      Just about any? Want examples? http://support.dell.com/support/edocs/systems/ins700m/en/OM/G74722LRs.pdf Relative humidity (maximum): Operating 10% to 90% (noncondensing) Storage 5% to 95% (noncondensing). http://docs.hp.com/en/A5191-96018/apbs06.html Operating Humidity 15 to 80% Relative humidity (Non-condensing) at 35oC (95oF) 40 to 60% Relative humidity (Non-condensing) 30% Per hour Relative humidity (Non-condensing) 90% Relative humidity (Non-condensing) at 65oC (149oF)

      Note that they keep repeating Non-condensing so everybody gets it.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    12. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      You're wrong.

      Condensation requires that the relative humidity get above 100%, at the source of the condensation. A very cold iPod in a warm pants pocket will reach 100% humidity on/in the iPod. The pocket will not reach that. The air it was in may not reach that. But for condensation to occur, by definition 100% relative (not specific) humidity was reached at the source of that condensation.

      I think this is where Apple will read off the operating manual: 5%-95% relative humidity, NON CONDENSING. If the sensor turned red, then you set up conditions inside your iPod/iPhone where there was condensation. You exceeded the range of humidity for operating the device.

      Is it a load of bullshit? Sure. But you bought it, signed on the dotted line, and agreed to operate it under very specific conditions.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    13. Re:Read the next line in the env. specs, people. by khallow · · Score: 1

      Condensation requires that the relative humidity get above 100%, at the source of the condensation.

      That's an interesting opinion. I don't see that in the contract and I imagine a court wouldn't either.

  11. Anti-consumerist horseshit by syousef · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While it's true that some portion of your customers are going to lie when they say there has been no water intrusion, including, at extra cost a device aimed at proving that your customer is lying on every device is unfair. Let alone close to the external extremedies of the device.

    Here's a prediction: First they will deny the problem, and try to cast doubt on the testing methodolgy, then they will acknowledge the problem but claim that it only occurs in a very limited set of circumstances and offer restitution but only for those who complain loudest. Then they'll make a minor change that doesn't actually fix the problem and claim it is fixed (oh and raise prices to cover this change). They'll stall at every step. This seems to be right out of the Apple customer service manual, and they're not the only ones (but they are some of the worst). No different to scratchable iPod minis, or cracked laptop cases. Fucking horseshit.

    But it's Apple, it just works, right? Come on fanbois, mod me into oblivion. I don't give a shit.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With apples history this is exactly what they will probably do. I don't understand why anyone buys products from them.

    2. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by Entropius · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's Apple, it just works, except for all the times when it doesn't.

      Ubuntu just works too, except for all the times when it doesn't. But those times, you can actually google the problem and fix it yourself. Apple, you're boned.

    3. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by dmomo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> While it's true that some portion of your customers are going to lie when they say there has been no water intrusion, including, at extra cost a device aimed at proving that your customer is lying on every device is unfair. Let alone close to the external extremedies of the device.

      Well said. Good contribution to the thread.

      >> Here's a prediction: First they will deny the problem, and try to cast doubt on the testing methodolgy, then they will acknowledge the problem but claim that it only occurs in a very limited set of circumstances and offer restitution but only for those who complain loudest.

      Decent editorial insight. The kind of thing that sparks great conversation.

      >> Then they'll make a minor change that doesn't actually fix the problem and claim it is fixed (oh and raise prices to cover this change). They'll stall at every step. This seems to be right out of the Apple customer service manual, and they're not the only ones (but they are some of the worst). No different to scratchable iPod minis, or cracked laptop cases.

      Still decent, but you're starting to get worked up!

      >> Fucking horseshit.

      Yep. You're working yourself up, son!

      >> But it's Apple, it just works, right? Come on fanbois, mod me into oblivion. I don't give a shit.
      And then you just slide down hill. If you were to be modded down, I don't think it'd have been because of your opinions / insights above. It's the fact that you seem to be asking for it right here. Maybe you're proud of your dissent and want to think the comments are controversial? Sorry, no. They grabbed my attention and got me thinking. But now I've forgotten everything you've said because of your silly little outburst.

    4. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the brilliant solutions offered by Motorola/LG/Samsung/Dell/Microsoft/HP/Asus/Sony/Nokia/etc right? The only reason why it is so evident on Apple products is because Apple has a -tiny- product line. Apple has what, 3 phones out? How many does Nokia have? A lot and a lot of them use radically different designs, a flaw in the Nokia 5070 is unlikely to be in the Nokia 6133. Compare this to Apple's 3 phones of similar to identical designs. Same thing with computers, look at how many different models of computer Dell has out right now, several different tower configurations, some low-profile desktops, some laptops, a netbook, an ultra-portable, etc. Compare this to Apple which has the Macbook, Mac Pro, Mac Mini and iMac line which rarely change when compared to other vendors.

      I'm not saying Apple is great, I'm simply saying that when you have a high marketshare, few different designs and a slow upgrade rate problems come out quicker. And every technology vendor does exactly what you say, that is what keeps them from going bankrupt at the first user complaint that a fan might possibly be loud.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    5. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      While it's true that some portion of your customers are going to lie when they say there has been no water intrusion, including, at extra cost a device aimed at proving that your customer is lying on every device is unfair. Let alone close to the external extremedies of the device.

      The cost for these detectors is pennies a phone.

    6. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> But it's Apple, it just works, right? Come on fanbois, mod me into oblivion. I don't give a shit.
      And then you just slide down hill. If you were to be modded down, I don't think it'd have been because of your opinions / insights above. It's the fact that you seem to be asking for it right here. Maybe you're proud of your dissent and want to think the comments are controversial? Sorry, no. They grabbed my attention and got me thinking. But now I've forgotten everything you've said because of your silly little outburst.

      Nice suck up work that, managed to whore you some fanboi karma.

    7. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu just works too, except for all the times when it doesn't. But those times, you can actually google the problem and fix it yourself.

      Until you find out that A) it's a known bug; B) it was fixed two months ago; and C) the fix won't be backported to the current release.

      Yes, there is a real bug I'm thinking of - ironically, it has to do with the included Samba in Ubuntu 9.10 not working with Apple's Time Capsule. It's fixed in Lucid Lynx. It won't be fixed in 9.10. I tried using the Lucid Lynx packages on 9.10, but that didn't work. I was able to get it to work by compiling Samba manually, but - well, let's just say I'm already well outside what the "average user" can be expected to do.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    8. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Son?

      Really?

      What are you, 65?

      Go to bed grandpa, you need the rest.

    9. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Nearly nobody will complain about this. It's a huge temperature difference which you won't get by talking on the phone for one minute while you're outside getting frostbite, then hopping inside to an unusually humid indoor environment.

    10. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by overlordofmu · · Score: 1

      But I remember his points because you highlighted his post and gave your opinion about how valid you thought each point was.

      She/He provided great content and you gave addition meta-information of reasonable quality.

      As far as your criticism of his progressive frustration and the value of his emotions, I feel differently.

      I have feelings. And this is a place were many parts of our human experiences are shared.

      I find her/his feelings to be just as important as his ideas. But this too is simply perspective.

      There are far more sensory signals, and ideas, at play in our lives for us to pay attention to them all.
      We all tune in to different things. To quote The Dude: "That's like . . . .your opinion, man."

    11. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by syousef · · Score: 0

      I'm not your son, you condescending twit.

      Did you actually have anything to contribute? I notice your vapid commentary got +5 insightful and as predicted I got modded down. Any time I mention that Apple isn't quite the darling company some believe it is I get modded down. Nothing to do with getting worked up. Apple fanbois SUCK.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    12. Re:Anti-consumerist horseshit by Wovel · · Score: 1

      I think he was merely pointing out that you were not going to get modded down because you said something anti-apple, you were going to get modded down because of your utterly pointless outburst.

  12. What are the sensors made of? by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 1

    I know that the sensors turn red or a different color when they get wet, is this because they litmus paper? I have thought that they could change colors because of the pH of water. Does anybody know exactly what causes the color change. What the sensor is made of.

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
    1. Re:What are the sensors made of? by juicegg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe the sensor is 3M Material 5559, which is a kind of humidity indicator. Wiki says, that these are usually made from Cobalt(II) chloride, which in pure form turns from blue to red powder by absorbing water.

    2. Re:What are the sensors made of? by the+brown+guy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what's used in these indicator strips but it's not litmus paper. FYI, the pH of water is 7, so it would have nothing to do with the color changing.

      I successfully returned my water damaged phone to Bell by removing the water indicator sticker and replacing it with one I made myself using paper. It would have been very easy to detect but I got lucky I guess.

      --
      Orbis terrarum est non altus satis
    3. Re:What are the sensors made of? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe the sensor is 3M Material 5559, which is a kind of humidity indicator. Wiki says, that these are usually made from Cobalt(II) chloride, which in pure form turns from blue to red powder by absorbing water.

      Either that or the phone is pregnant.

    4. Re:What are the sensors made of? by mysidia · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm surprised the phone manufacturers haven't gotten a law passed against that.

      I do know that some of the manufacturers have indicated they hide multiple sensors inside the phones though.

      Some of the sensors intentionally placed in positions where the consumer cannot access them (without destroying the phone)

      One sensor to allow easy initial warranty rejections. And one buried sensor to allow rejections at a later stage of inspection.

    5. Re:What are the sensors made of? by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      They are probably these.

    6. Re:What are the sensors made of? by polymath69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I successfully returned my water damaged phone to Bell by removing the water indicator sticker and replacing it with one I made myself using paper.

      I'm surprised the phone manufacturers haven't gotten a law passed against that.

      There is one already. It's known as fraud.

      --

      --
      I don't want to rule the world... I just want to be in charge of mayonnaise.
    7. Re:What are the sensors made of? by HeikkiK · · Score: 1

      Either that or the phone is pregnant.

      iPhone nano coming out in June.

    8. Re:What are the sensors made of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Either that or the phone is pregnant.

      Your logic is wrong. Apple users don't have sex with females.

    9. Re:What are the sensors made of? by MrPhilby · · Score: 0

      Not too many iPADs needed then.

    10. Re:What are the sensors made of? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      >It's known as fraud.

      Ish. I just returned a phone to ATT. They only ask what the color of the sensor is. They didn't ask if the phone was in water, or if I might have tampered with the sensor.

      They could ask if I have tampered with the sensor, but that brings up the ugly potential of people figuring out that they *could* tamper with the sensor.

    11. Re:What are the sensors made of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fraud eh?

      It is in no way fraud if I modify a device I own in any way I like.

      This includes, but is not limited to: Replacing little white circles of paper inside a device with little white circles of paper I punched out of a piece of laser paper. This is my right. I do not have to tell anyone I did this. I am well within my rights to remove them entirely. Hell, if I were so inclined I am well within my rights to remove the dorsal portion of the phone-body and replace it with a well molded piece of concrete.

      In all of those cases outlined above, I am no more required by law to recant, in depth, the presence of same or my attempts to perform same, to any entity except when in situations I would be otherwise under oath.

  13. Actually, that IS out of spec... by apraetor · · Score: 1

    Apple's specs DO allow those temperatures ranges. However, they clearly state that the humidity must be non-condensing. Since the phone is being abruptly moved from extremely cold to warm locations, and the resultant condensing humidity is the cause, it seems pretty obvious that the damage is occurring from mis-use, not from use in spec-approved conditions.

    1. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by Entropius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There was no damage involved, simply a triggering of a LCI. The problem isn't that the devices can be damaged by condensation, it's that the LCI's are more sensitive than the device itself to condensation!

    2. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by poopdeville · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's marketed as a PORTABLE PHONE. Look up "IMPLIED WARRANTY OF FITNESS FOR PURPOSE". If the phone can't handle common environments where people tend to carry around phones, it's not a PORTABLE PHONE.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    3. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it isn't marketed as a hand held phone?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by poopdeville · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes. They specifically refer to it as a "mobile phone" and Safari as a "mobile web browser".

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    5. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by apraetor · · Score: 1

      It's more of a portable computer. And I'd have thought that not exposing a computer to very cold temps and then immediately bringing it in to a warmer environment where condensation will form was common sense. That's physics. They can whine all they want, but water is going to condense on cold surfaces regardless.

    6. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by poopdeville · · Score: 0, Troll

      You can hit 100% humidity in Florida. That is enough to void the warranty, just by doing nothing at all. Is it common sense for these little sensors to trip and ruin your chances for replacing their shoddy, unfit-for-its-purpose product?

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    7. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by maxume · · Score: 1

      The problem with this line of reasoning is that your insistence on receiving a $1,200 phone that you can treat like an inert slab of metal means that I might not be able to buy an $800 phone that I have to pay some attention to.

      (This is all in the abstract, I wouldn't spend the money on an iPhone+contract and don't have anybody offering to do it for me, so my phone cost $30; I could give a shit about it having a good warranty)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Except there is this thing called "implied warranty". Depending on your state, manufacturers cannot disclaim warranty for what a reasonable person would expect something he bought to do. You can't write a warranty for your hammer that says you can't drive nails with it -- that provision would be void.

      Dropping your phone in the toilet is not something covered by implied warranty. Taking your phone from outdoors to indoors at normal humidity for each environment is something reasonable people expect to be able to do. And in fact this does *not* damage the phone, only the sensor. Denying warranty coverage because of a sensor that generates false positives from normal use is not reasonable.

      The earphone jack is a bad place to put this sensor. It's convenient because the techs can see it without cracking the case, but topologically its part of the *exterior* of the phone.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Apple shouldn't be selling iPhones in Florida, or Canada, or lots of other places if the phone is unfit for the purpose it is being advertised for. It amounts to false advertising. If you can't stand behind your product, you shouldn't be selling it. (Mind you, if it's perfectly fine for use in Italy's climate or whatever, more power to Apple to sell it there).

      Imagine going to Antartica, and finding that the "Official Camping Supply Store" sold sleeping bags that broke to pieces in Antarctic weather. Is that fit for the purpose you got it? That sleeping bag might be just fine in parts of North America, but it is ENTIRELY unsuited for Antarctic weather. That would be a problem, right? But it wouldn't if they just sold in North America, right? So why is Apple selling these phones in Canada? Florida, which regularly hits 100F and 100% humidity?

      I have a crappy little cell phone, and had parts replaced. The clerk at T-Mobile said I kept it in good shape. Then she saw that a sensor had tripped. Luckily, she said "That's weird" and just gave me a new phone.

      I'm not demanding an inert slab of metal. I'm demanding a phone that does what I expect it to -- let me carry it around in my pocket without fear that not doing anything at all to it will break it, when there simply happens to be average weather for my region. If they can't sell a phone that does that, they shouldn't be marketing ANY phones in that market. It really is against the law.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    10. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by deniable · · Score: 1

      However, they clearly state that the humidity must be non-condensing.

      No, they don't. They're talking about measuring the non-condensing part of the air, otherwise an air-conditioned room or a rainy day would void the warranty.

    11. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Your definition of purpose is way out there. It isn't unreasonable for Apple to market the phone in Canada with a disclaimer that using or storing the phone in certain extreme conditions may damage it (most people don't spend much of their day in -20 C weather, so that is, in fact, an extreme condition). There are enough buildings to make it so that a portable phone is still useful.

      If there was a case where it was decided that Apple was breaking the law by marketing their phones (with moisture disclaimers) in Florida and Canada, I would be disappointed in the law (see how that works, I don't want to argue about whether it is legal or not, my personal opinion is that it isn't that ridiculous).

      As far as your sleeping bag thing, if someone went to Antarctica without proper shelter, I wouldn't begrudge anything anybody did to try to help them, whether money changed hands or not.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    12. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      McMurtough Station houses about 1,200 people full time. They have stores there. And a bowling alley. And research stations. And janitors and a mechanics' shop or five. The point was to come up with a market where physical needs have consequences if they aren't met, and to show what the implied warranty of fitness for purpose means by comparing purposes and markets. It is fundamentally tied to the purpose for which a product is to marketed to be used, and secondarily to the market in which it is sold. (Admittedly, if the store put up disclaimers about the sleeping bags -- something like "THESE TENTS ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR ANTARCTIC WEATHER", like you suggested, there would be no "problem" except that maybe there aren't any warm sleeping bags in Antartica).

      Is Apple doing anything remotely like that? Nope. They show commercials of hip looking 20-somethings walking around New York City and Miami and San Francisco and Portland with their phones to their ears. Playing with their compass app, searching for restaurants.

      Apple is selling a product they know, with a high degree of probability, will be rendered broken or at least out of warranty (specifically because of this humidity sensor thing), in Florida. I don't live there any more, but it's not much less humid in the Pacific North West, where this same problem almost bit me in the ass and cost me $100 (despite the fact that I had not violated my warranty in any way).

      I wouldn't begrudge anything anybody did to try to help them, whether money changed hands or not.

      Perhaps you should, at least if money changed hands. You paid for one thing and got something else. I see that as a problem.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    13. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by maxume · · Score: 1

      If you are going to Antarctica, you need to take your safety into your own hands, not hope that the label on the box is accurate.

      This principle applies to other things as well. For instance, making sure that expensive, semi-delicate electronics are not exposed to harsh environments.

      (Extending the legal situation: to prove that what Apple is doing is illegal would take a single court case; there apparently isn't one...)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    14. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      So... having a humidifier in your house and living in a place where it might get cold means that Apple products are unsuitable for you? I really think they should make that a LOT more apparent, because as it is, it seems a hell of a lot like a bait and switch, where they tell you that you can go have fun with their devices, but forget to tell you that you can't actually have fun with their devices unless you live in a hermetically sealed environment.

      How can you even think about defending that practice? I mean, seriously... do you have no self-respect?

    15. Re:Actually, that IS out of spec... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      (Extending the legal situation: to prove that what Apple is doing is illegal would take a single court case; there apparently isn't one...)

      Unless enough people can get together to form a class action in the US, there won't be one. Your "each pays their own costs" system explicitly discourages people from taking a company to court over something that can be replaced for under $1000.

  14. Why is this surprising? by Sitnalta · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So where's the story? Water is water. It doesn't matter if it's condensation or spilled coffee, the result is damage to the electronics that is no fault of Apple's. They can't protect their devices against every retard who doesn't have enough common sense to not expose their iPhones to environmental extremes.

    Also, the tech specs only say that the iPhone will WORK at -20 C, it makes no mention of suddenly exposing it to warm, moist air.

    1. Re:Why is this surprising? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... and do they make any claims against it either? I don't have one laying about to check, but another poster said it states the humidity must be non-condensing.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:Why is this surprising? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Typical crap of an Apple apologist who doesn't bother to even understand the issue but blindly tries to defend Apple.

      There is no damage to the electronics in the case of some condensed humidity (condensed water shouldn't not conduct because it is quite pure and the amount of it is too small anyway). The problem is that this water triggers the liquid sensors so if the device ever fails, for completely different reasons, Apple will refuse all warranty claims because the liquid sensors were triggered once.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    3. Re:Why is this surprising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So where's the story? Water is water. It doesn't matter if it's condensation or spilled coffee, the result is damage to the electronics that is no fault of Apple's. They can't protect their devices against every retard who doesn't have enough common sense to not expose their iPhones to environmental extremes.

      Also, the tech specs only say that the iPhone will WORK at -20 C, it makes no mention of suddenly exposing it to warm, moist air.

      You need to brush up on warranty law. Since everyone expects their portable phones' operating condition to lie within the normal temperature variation of the place the phones are sold at, there's an expected fitness, and Apple cannot void the warranty. If they sell the phones in NY, it's expected to work in the range of temperatures of NY. Failing to do so is a design defect, and it's their responsibility.

      This does not apply to electronics that are expected to work only indoors. But that's not the expectation for cell phones.

      Honestly, if they refuse warranty for anyone's phones because of this, just take them to small claims court. They're not likely to bother sending anyone to defend themselves, and even they do, they're going to lose. Just take a bunch of these articles with you.

    4. Re:Why is this surprising? by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Or you assume they will but provide no actually evidence that has ever actually happened to anyone.

  15. Just another way for them to scam people... by Entropius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The question is whether the LCI's can be triggered by exposure to condensation, moisture, etc., which won't actually harm the device. Clearly those LCI's are more sensitive than the device they're attached to to water damage. If the manufacturer refuses to honor a warranty because of a LCI positive reading, but the damage to the device wasn't in fact caused by water, then you ought to be able to sue them for breach of contract.

    I had a cell phone battery fail (because of a defect), but the manufacturer wouldn't replace it because the LCI was tripped on the phone. The failure mode wasn't one that would have been caused by water damage.

    1. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Why? If they have done their work right, triggering the LCI voids the warranty, regardless of the condition of the device (because the device has been exposed to conditions that are not covered in the warranty).

      That it continues to work after the triggering is simply a bonus, and that it fails for some other reason is simply unfortunate.

      If those things bother you, factor them into the purchasing decision.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by poopdeville · · Score: 0, Troll

      Implied warranty of fitness for purpose. That's why.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    3. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately AT&T, at least, wouldn't let me read the conditions of the warranty until after I'd signed a contract. And the warranty doesn't say what conditions, exactly, trigger the LCI.

      They are douchebags of the highest order. (This isn't for an iphone, just a generic cheapie cellphone)

    4. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Just not quite douchey enough for you to simply walk away?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I had no choice at the time -- because of some travel issues I had to get a cell phone contract very very quickly.

      And they're all douchebags, really -- there's no option there.

    6. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      how did your lawsuit turn out?

    7. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I think you have it backwards. They don't put LCIs in to scam people. They put LCIs in to stop people scamming them. And until someone is refused by Apple for a replacement because of a false reading, I fail to see what the big deal is. In your case, it looks like the manufacturer is in the wrong. That sucks, but that doesn't mean all companies behave the same.

    8. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone who repairs electronic devices often debugging the device using a can of freeze spray I can confidently say that sensitive electronics will happily keep running with not just condensing mist forming on the surface, but out right water droplets, providing these don't combine and start running down the device.

      Water on electronics isn't an issue till it connects across adjacent electrical traces. Even then water that is caused by condensation is very pure and has an incredibly high resistance so even if it does start running down the circuit board of the phone doesn't mean the phone is instantly dead.

      You can bet your warranty that all this will set off the LCI though.

    9. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I knew someone who used to work at a cell phone sales/repair shop.

      LCI's were a great money maker and were used to deny warranties. This was true even for damages where a button was missing or something unrelated to water damage. They were charged full price for a new phone even after paying a monthly warranty. Customers were pissed as hell but the phone companies all do it as they have an oligopoly on the market. The boss even joked around saying we should have a spray bottle in the back so he could make even more money.

      Apple is no different. More than likely they are used to scam consumers and the warranties are sold as "as long as the damage is not water related we will cover it!" and instead "wait water damage is on phone we wont cover it even if its our fault".

      My wife just got ripped off buying a cell phone bundled with a package from our cable company saying it was free with a 2 year contract with their ISP. I told her it was a scam and not to do it. Well we now have 2 bills charged separately. The other $50 a month for the free cell phone was secret and really was not included with the ISP as promised ugh (just as a secret seperate). See it wont be billed with your cable or internet if you order it!

      I do not understand how anyone can trust these companies. Like the banks the mega phone companies are becoming just as evil. I really do not like how business is being done in the last decade or so.

    10. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Maybe some small businesses like to scam people when it comes to hardware warranties, but when you're a big as Apple, you tend to take things a but more seriously. I'm sure LCIs cause more problems and make it harder for the consumer, but that's not the same as intentionally scamming people.

    11. Re:Just another way for them to scam people... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      This whole thread is amusing though, especially to anyone who has ever had to have apple fix something. While they are not perfect, they absolutely do not look for reasons to deny warranty service. I have never had a service encounter with Apple where I felt like they had any other goal than to get my computer working. Most recently they replaced a fan in my laptop two months after my warranty expired. Did I mention my two month out of warranty laptop has a huge dent in the express card slot from falling off the washing machine. Oh and it is missing one or two case screws.

      It is a bit like Dell of 10 years ago. Dell today is all about doing whatever they can to prevent you from actually having something fixed. Dear Dell.. My right control key is missing. "Please delete your browser history, this should fix your ctrl-key missing problem".

  16. What about hairspray? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While this might be viewed as morally reprehensible, but so is
    voiding the warranty for a little bit of condensation.
    If you put a little bit of hairspray on the sensor, would it trigger it?
    And if it doesn't, then would it protect the sensor from condensation?

  17. The Question is... by bashibazouk · · Score: 1

    Is this unique to the iphone or will some/most/all cell phones have their LCI tripped if treated in this way?

  18. yea, hardly reliable by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, Apple's LCI can trip unexpectedly...

    A few years back, I dropped my Motorola RAZR V3 into a hot tub. It was submerged about 3-5 seconds before I got it back out.

    The phone was dead, as expected - but the LCI did not "go off."

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    1. Re:yea, hardly reliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must've been a bubble covering the sensor.

      I've got to say I don't understand this. Only the impurities in the water conduct electricity and cause damage.
      Pure or distilled water can't hurt an electric device any more than air could.

      If I dropped my PDA in the tub or left it in the rain, the first thing I'd do is open it and pull the battery. The I'd rinse everything with alcohol to speed evaporation and reduce corrosion. After it dried for a couple hours, I'd test the battery and put it back together. I bet the number one problem with submerging in liquid is damaging the battery, not frying the main circuits.

      The only other thing I can think of is corrosion might damage exposed metal. But, unless it's left wet for a couple hours that shouldn't happen.

    2. Re:yea, hardly reliable by icebraining · · Score: 1

      My mother's phone (an old Motorola) spent one night submerged in greasy water, and after being discovered, it spent the day drying. The next day it was working fine.

    3. Re:yea, hardly reliable by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Only the impurities in the water conduct electricity and cause damage.

      The phone itself surely contains many impurities that would be almost immediately dissolved in any water entering the phone.

    4. Re:yea, hardly reliable by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      Well, you usually don't wash with distilled water. You're just creating short circuits while the device is in the water, which can kill the electronics. I have a Powerbook that has survived very well to a trip to a fountain (i'm actually typing on it), however i've killed several phones like this. Fortunately, my phones are usually very cheap. Water from the sea is actually the worst with regards to this.

    5. Re:yea, hardly reliable by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pure or distilled water can't hurt an electric device any more than air could.

            Good luck finding "pure" water anywhere on PLANET EARTH. I am fed up with this internet myth. The people who go around claiming that "pure" water doesn't conduct electricity don't remember that water SELF IONIZES to H+ and OH-. Which is why "pure" water has a pH of roughly 7. Oh what does pH mean again? It's the negative log base 10 of the molar concentration of Hydrogen IONS. So in every mole of "pure" water, you will actually have 10-7 moles of hydrogen ions and 10-7 moles of hydroxide ions and GUESS WHAT? They are charged and conduct electricity!

            The fact that water is not a "good" conductor can only fool idiots into thinking that it's an INSULATOR (ie "pure water doesn't conduct electricity"). For all these idiots I invite you to use water immersion cooling methods for your computers, because after all who wants to deal with all that icky mineral oil... or better still, stand in a puddle of "pure water" on a "clean" conducting surface, and put your fingers in a 240V socket.

      Pure or distilled water can't hurt an electric device any more than air could.

            Yes keep thinking that and keep wondering why your electric devices keep frying when they shouldn't be, instead of learning some damned chemistry.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    6. Re:yea, hardly reliable by apoc.famine · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was about to mod you down, but I guess I should educate instead:

      Depending on your source, and whether or not the water is highly chlorinated, it can be pretty non-conductive. A couple of examples of this:

      The town I used to live in got its water from a reservoir. They lightly chlorinated it, and then pumped it around town. I had a few accidents involving beer/soda and electronics, but in all cases, immediately unplugging the power/battery, disassembling, rinsing well with tap water, and letting dry for a couple days, the electronics worked fine. I had a keyboard with soda inside the membrane, and 8 years later it still works.

      I taught high school science for 5 years, and we had a fairly simple conductivity tester - a lightbulb with the circuit broken. The setup had a goose-neck, with two exposed probes. You plugged it into a standard 120V outlet, and when the two probes, about 1/2" apart, were dunked in a conducting solution, the light bulb lit up. Standard tap water in that town did NOT light it up. Add 0.1g of salt to 100ml of water, and it light up just fine.

      It's true that pure water won't hurt electronics. And condensed water is likely to be damn pure. Yes, it disassociates into ions. But the concentration is so small, and the distance between the ions so large, that it's essentially non-conducting.

      It's sad you got modded up for not knowing what you're talking about.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    7. Re:yea, hardly reliable by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      While your beer/soda anecdotes might be quite entertaining, the poster I was responding to compared the conductivity of water to the conductivity of air.

      Now since this is a site for nerds, we don't need to resort to anecdotes to make points. There exists an SI unit for conductivity called the Siemens per meter (S/m).

      While it's true that clean fresh water has a LOW conductivity (around 5 x 10^-2 to 5x10^6 (your deionized water) S/m), and while this is less than sea water which comes in at 5 S/m, and while I agree that this is several orders of magnitude less than say aluminum at roughly 40 S/m, air has a conductivity of 3 x 10^-15 S/m which is QUITE a difference. In fact it's 9 orders of magnitude less than the "purest" most "non conducting" water, compared to from aluminum to fresh water being only 4 orders of magnitude.

      I don't concentrate on deionized water because first you won't find it outside of a lab and secondly even in a lab it won't stay deionized for much more than an hour once you expose it to air.

      However let's be more practical. Again, feel free to prove your theory that water is not a conductor by standing in a puddle barefoot and electrocuting yourself. Remember to ensure that your last thought be "I'll be ok, water doesn't conduct electricity". And please name me as the beneficiary of your life insurance policy before you do this. Water is a BAD conductor, but it is a conductor nonetheless and you may feel free to plunge your electronics in it. However I shall pass.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:yea, hardly reliable by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Actually you can put a whole motherboard and power supply in pure water and it wont short. I have seen it on slashdot and the computer works. The H+ and oh- balance itself out.

      The problem is the metallic elements on the motherboard begin dissolving and after a day or two it will start shorting.

      If water drips it will dissolve the chemicals on a board inside a phone and wont remain pure water anymore.

    9. Re:yea, hardly reliable by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Please tell these people that you read on the internet somewhere that water doesn't conduct electricity.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:yea, hardly reliable by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Air is plenty conductive - you might recall lightning bolts. Comparing air to water isn't that useful - almost anything is conductive given enough potential difference between two points.

      A puddle, unless on an insoluble surface, probably is pretty conductive. As you seem to understand, it's the dissolved ions which are the issue when talking about conductivity. However, the article is about condensation on electronics. Condensed water is very, very non-conductive, ESPECIALLY when you consider the voltages we're talking about.

      You can throw out all the examples which have nothing to deal with the article you like. When it comes right down to it, condensed water at the voltages you find in an iPhone means very, very little conduction.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    11. Re:yea, hardly reliable by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      condensed water at the voltages you find in an iPhone means very, very little conduction.

            Considering this is coming from a person who believes air is "plenty conductive" while water is "pretty conductive" has just disqualified you from the pool of rational people I am willing to converse with. You're just a vulgar peasant pretending to be smart by reading "the nerd site". If the big numbers hurt your brain, you don't HAVE to come here.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    12. Re:yea, hardly reliable by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Caveat: the water moisture condensing on the phones may be pure "enough", but that's not what causes the damage in such a situation (arguably). It would be the sweat, grease, oils, and dirt which have also worked their way into the device from daily regular handling and contact with users' faces.

      Realistically, there's no reason why the iPhone can't be hermetically sealed. There are no replaceable parts in them. Just seal them and be done with it: then there'd be no possible way for failure to occur. However, I suspect that wouldn't net Apple as much revenue.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    13. Re:yea, hardly reliable by BillX · · Score: 1

      You mean we are getting scammed buying bottles of DI water for the electronics lab? ;-)

      There are probably urban legends out there claiming pure water is the universe's most potent insulator, but the fact is pure water is a poor enough conductor that it would not always cause undesired operation, and rarely catastrophic damage in the short term. Consumer electronics DO get repeatedly exposed to 'water' in the form of condensation films, and are expected to handle them gracefully - not to mention in combination with dust and lint particles, cigarette smoke residue, pet hairs, and for self-installed electronics, finger oils as well (how many swab that new videocard down with alcohol after installing it, even though their fingerprints are all over it?) Under ideal circumstances, a well-cleaned circuit board may have 20Mohms resistance between adjacent pads, but this can drop rapidly in some real-world usage scenarios.

      In any case, the reason a fishtank full of distilled water is not a good idea for keeping your motherboard cooled, is that distilled water doesn't stay distilled for long, particularly when immersing a big collection of soluble contaminants and metals into it. High conductivity will hurt the gadget now; corrosion will hurt the gadget later. The GP has it right - if a gadget takes a dunk, *immediately* pull the batteries, then give it another bath - in distilled water, to remove corrosive contaminants - and dry very thoroughly (days).

      Ironically, most modern ("eco") solder flux is designed to be water-soluble; dunking completed PCB assemblies in distilled water is a standard manufacturing step.

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    14. Re:yea, hardly reliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pool water has lots of IONS in it. Were it distilled water, it wouldn't conduct electricity much at all.

  19. I guarantee the sensor works 100% by jeko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The purpose of the sensor is not to detect water. The purpose of the sensor is to give Apple and the insurance company a technical strawman to point to as to why you're not gonna get the warranty replacement you've morally and legally got coming.

    "We're not honoring the warranty because the machine says you've been bad," sounds sbetter than "We don't wanna honor your warranty 'cause that would cost us money to live up to our obligations."

    It's the same function polygraphs, e-meters and other "lie detectors" serve. They're technically nonsense, but they give the organization an excuse you can't refute since it's nonsense in the first place.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:I guarantee the sensor works 100% by konohitowa · · Score: 4, Informative

      I went into an Apple store and got my original iPhone replaced 10 months after buying it because I dropped it two stories onto concrete. It still worked, but it wouldn't take a charge and the main button was constantly pressed. I admitted to the damage vector (it was a bit hard not too -- major scratches and dings on the aluminum). They tested my phone, verified that it wouldn't take a charge, wiped my current phone, swapped the SIM into a new phone, activated it, and sent me on my way.

      Those eeeevil bastards.

    2. Re:I guarantee the sensor works 100% by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      try to look at it from their perspective. a lot of devices are damaged by water. should they have to *prove* that the device was damaged by water? i guess they'd need to hire an independent investigator to give it any credence too. oops, i guess they might as well just replace any device that has the LCI tripped ... it's going to cost too much to prove the water damage.

      now, when i want a new iphone, i just expose it to moisture until it fails ... then let it dry out. that's the problem. if you dry out a device that failed because moisture damage, you really can't easily tell. in fact, people that live in cold climates just get new iphones every couple of months by using them outside now and then.

      oh by the way, that $600 iphone now costs $1000 to cover all the people that are repeatedly wrecking their phones with moisture damage.

      personally, i'd rather pay a fair price for my devices and take care of them. i don't want to pay for dummies that don't take care of their stuff.

    3. Re:I guarantee the sensor works 100% by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Individual Apple employees don't really give a fuck if Apple has to shell out for a replacement iPhone vs. Company management killing a significant part of all warranty replacements. Story by random internet dude vs. Presence of LCIs in all mobile Apple devices. Guess you were lucky it fell (two stories) on concrete and not into a puddle.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:I guarantee the sensor works 100% by konohitowa · · Score: 1

      Individual Apple employees don't really give a fuck if Apple has to shell out for a replacement iPhone

      Then certainly they don't give a fuck about the LCI either which makes it moot -- at least according to your hypothesis.

      I suppose this is where I'm supposed to call you "Angry random internet dude without any actual evidence vs. an actual replacement story.." or something equally childish. But I'll refrain.

    5. Re:I guarantee the sensor works 100% by moonbender · · Score: 1

      You're missing the point. I'm sure they don't give a fuck about the LCIs, but I'm also pretty sure that someone who consistently ignored devices installed specifically to get out of a warranty replacement (justified or not) wouldn't be in charge of warranty issues for a long time. They might have a bit more leeway if they can cross the "Misc" box on the replacement form. It obviously makes for great PR.

      I'm not particularly angry and the evidence is the presence of LCIs in most mobile electronics (you know, the topic of this whole discussion). As for anecdotes, I've actually posted my two friends' non-replacement stories (never had to return my own Apple gear) somewhere else, but short of a Slashdot poll on the topic we're not going to get a meaningful sample here.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    6. Re:I guarantee the sensor works 100% by konohitowa · · Score: 1

      If only we were talking about LCI's. Unfortunately, I was responding to this:

      The purpose of the sensor is not to detect water. The purpose of the sensor is to give Apple and the insurance company a technical strawman to point to as to why you're not gonna get the warranty replacement you've morally and legally got coming. "We're not honoring the warranty because the machine says you've been bad," sounds sbetter than "We don't wanna honor your warranty 'cause that would cost us money to live up to our obligations."

      The statement by the OP was that the purpose of the sensor wasn't to detect water but was just a plan to avoid warranty claims. My anecdotal response was merely to show that it's not as black & white as (s)he would like to believe. If anything, it would be far cheaper for them to add shock monitoring code to the firmware so that claims like mine could be easily denied.

    7. Re:I guarantee the sensor works 100% by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Apple is pretty consistently company-wide very forgiving about warranty service. This whole thread is ludicrous. See my own story about my battered out-of-warranty laptop being fixed for free further up.

  20. Come on now, by Stan92057 · · Score: 0

    Come on now, ya have to know apples stuff is condensation proof :) Thats just not possible,and if condensation is thinking on doing it Steve Jobs will scream at to not too heheheh

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  21. Submersion sensor too small. by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This just means they need more separation between the electrodes of their submersion sensor. Which is a problem in a small device.

    To sense water reliably, while ignoring condensation, you need contacts some distance apart and some distance from a surface. The distances needs to be bigger than a water droplet. The size of water droplets is limited by surface tension. About 0.3 inch is probably big enough. In a tiny device, getting an air space that big is tough.

    1. Re:Submersion sensor too small. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      > This just means they need more separation between the electrodes of their submersion sensor. Which is a problem in a small device.

      The sensor is a chemical one. It's a patch of off-white printing that turns red when wetted.

      > To sense water reliably, while ignoring condensation

      Why? Condensation IS water. Water affects electronicsin the real world. Water is generally bad for electronics in the real world. Very very tiny electronics (like you referred to indirectly above) are affected even more. The touchscreen insides, the speakers, any electrical contacts, the miniscule contacts in the dock connector, all of it can be affected by water.

    2. Re:Submersion sensor too small. by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      There are no electrical connections on a liquid sensor - it is just a pad that changes color when it is exposed to water - or even high humidity. The purposes of this is to detect that a phone has been exposed to water, which will really screw it up. Thus, phones that have color-changed liquid sensors are not eligible for warranty replacement.

    3. Re:Submersion sensor too small. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These sensors aren't electrical, they're chemical. They look like little circles of white paper, but permanently stain red (or other patterns - I've seen blue stripes) when they are exposed to liquid water. And, if my experience is anything to go by, they aren't very reliable. My cell has one behind the battery pack; the thing has never been submerged, exposed to rain, etc, and I look at it one day, and see that it's tripped. Good thing I'm already out of warranty.

    4. Re:Submersion sensor too small. by jklovanc · · Score: 1

      There are no contacts involved in this process. Look at this this. It is basically a compound that changes colour when exposed to enough water. No electricity involved.

    5. Re:Submersion sensor too small. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just means they need more separation between the electrodes of their submersion sensor. Which is a problem in a small device.

      To sense water reliably, while ignoring condensation, you need contacts some distance apart and some distance from a surface. The distances needs to be bigger than a water droplet. The size of water droplets is limited by surface tension. About 0.3 inch is probably big enough. In a tiny device, getting an air space that big is tough.

      Parent post is totally wrong. How in the hell did this get modded up?

    6. Re:Submersion sensor too small. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sensors are chemical, not electrical.

    7. Re:Submersion sensor too small. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On /., tl;dr is implied for the poster as well as the modder.

    8. Re:Submersion sensor too small. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These submersion sensors are different than what you're thinking. They produce a chemical reaction with liquid water to turn pink.

  22. Sounds like they worked according to spec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In the tech specs for the iPhone, Apple rates the non-operating temperature range as -20 to 45 C"

    And in the very next line of the specs it says "Relative humidity: 5% to 95% noncondensing", while the article summary clearly states the testers caused condensation to trip the sensors.

    You can debate the appropriateness of the spec, but you ought to at least read it before claiming parts don't operate according to spec.

    1. Re:Sounds like they worked according to spec by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the global warming era, where we leave out any inconvenient truth that is, well, inconvenient to the point we want to make.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  23. Exclamation Points!!! by dangitman · · Score: 1

    In other words, even moving in and out during regular winter time will make you iPhone LCI turn red!

    Yes, Apple is doing something that lots of companies do! But you'll never hear reports about those other companies doing it, because they aren't Apple!!

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Exclamation Points!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or rather
      Yes, Apple is doing something that lots of companies do! But the public will find a way to think this is ok because it's Apple
      Apple's cult following allows it to screw over their customers again and again without anyone thinking twice

    2. Re:Exclamation Points!!! by dangitman · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yes, Apple is doing something that lots of companies do! But the public will find a way to think this is ok because it's Apple

      But there is no protest when other companies do it, so what's the difference? Seems like there are more people trying to come up with reasons why it is not OK because it is Apple.

      Apple's cult following allows it to screw over their customers again and again without anyone thinking twice

      And yet other companies also screw over customers, and you rarely see articles about it.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Exclamation Points!!! by moonbender · · Score: 1

      The difference is that Apple is probably the highest profile consumer electronics brand in the western world? With a somewhat high-quality/luxury/high-price image attached to many of the products? What's so difficult about that to understand?

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:Exclamation Points!!! by dangitman · · Score: 0, Troll

      The difference is that Apple is probably the highest profile consumer electronics brand in the western world? With a somewhat high-quality/luxury/high-price image attached to many of the products? What's so difficult about that to understand?

      So, only the highest profile companies are worthy of criticism? The irony is that Apple got the same kind of attention when it was "beleaguered" and sure to go out of business as a massive failure.

      I'm just concerned over the state of modern journalism. If something is an issue, it should be an issue regardless of who does it.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    5. Re:Exclamation Points!!! by Wovel · · Score: 1

      And no one has yet to post a story about warranty service being refused by apple for umm well anything realy.

  24. Come on, people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What has become of my beloved Slashdot?! Where are the knowledgeable nerds?

    Here we are 50 posts in. We've had bitching about Apple's sneakiness. We've had bitching about foggy glasses. We've had bitching about condensation in general.

    What we haven't had is someone who knows how to AVOID condensation. How do you take a piece of kit from cold outside to warm inside without having moisture appear on it? Is it even possible?

    1. Re:Come on, people! by istartedi · · Score: 1

      It seems like you could put it in an airtight plastic bag when going from cold to warm. When the bag is dry, it's safe to remove.

      Of course, there's the problem of air in the bag. You need to make sure the bag is in close contact with the device or else carry dessicant around with you. Of course, this is an Apple device. Somebody ought to make a stylish little box that encloses it perfectly.

      There are already shrink-on plastic shields to protect the screens and various other enhancements that surround your iPhone to protect it; so you need to make sure the condensation protector doesn't conflict with that.

      I haven't looked up close at an iPhone (I don't have one myself) but I assume the device can't be airtight for some reason (speaker? cracks around a micro USB socket?). If it could be made air-tight, at least temporarily, then the problem is also solved.

      Now get to work Apple-cozy guys.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:Come on, people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just do what photographers have done for decades.
      You put the device somewhere on your person where it stays warm - like an inside pocket.

      This isn't about the Iphone - it's about clueless users.

      Every phone currently in use has these, and they all work the same.

      Yet we don't hear a hue and cry about voided warranties on blackberries and smartphones.

      Why is that?

  25. Technicalities of specs, vs reality by hidden · · Score: 1

    1)Apple sells this phone in northerly climates (Canada for one)

    2)Apple specs that it can be (when turned off) in environments down to -20 Celsius

    3)I don't think anyone will argue with me that the nominal purpose of a cell phone, is as a communication device that a person CAN CARRY AROUND WITH THEM.

    Combining these 3 facts, I think a reasonable person would conclude that they can take the phone in and out of the house with them when it is warmer than -20 C outside.

    Thus, It seems reasonable that the warranty should still apply when this "reasonable person" has taken the phone in and out of the house at, oh, say -15 C

    However, this test shows that doing so can trigger the humidity sensor, thereby voiding the warranty. Even though the person has not done anything unreasonable.

    The think that I think some of you (who live in warmer climates?) are missing is this: the environment changes used in this test simulate normal daily use for those of us who live in colder climates.

    Also, I doubt this issue is limited to iPhones: I had at least one motorola phone's warranty voided by the water sensor, even though I was unaware of having ever gotten the phone wet. This article could finally explain that issue as well...

    1. Re:Technicalities of specs, vs reality by KiahZero · · Score: 1

      You leave your phone outside in the cold for hours on end in "normal daily use?" Or do you keep it on your person, which is presumably warmer than -15C?

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
    2. Re:Technicalities of specs, vs reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever left a phone in a glove box? Do you really think (and I realize you're a lawyer, so you really might) that it is unreasonable or "not normal" to leave a cell phone in your car?

    3. Re:Technicalities of specs, vs reality by hidden · · Score: 1

      Well, if my phone is in a purse or backpack, and I'm outside, the phone isn't going to get much benefit from body heat...

      Even in my personal case - I carry my phone in the cargo pocket of my pants most of the time - so I'm sure it gets some body heat, but it's certainly cold to the touch when I come inside with it.

    4. Re:Technicalities of specs, vs reality by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      3)I don't think anyone will argue with me that the nominal purpose of a cell phone, is as a communication device that a person CAN CARRY AROUND WITH THEM.

      you have pockets right? stick in an inside pocket and it won't get below freezing.

    5. Re:Technicalities of specs, vs reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah he carries his phone with him in his rectum, nice and warm

    6. Re:Technicalities of specs, vs reality by KiahZero · · Score: 1

      There is a very large difference between "cold to the touch" and "well below freezing."

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
  26. So, it's just as they specify. by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

    It clearly stated that the non-operating temperature range is -20 to 45 C, so you would expect that if the iphone is subjected to this temperature range, is *will* become 'non-operating'.

    --
    Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
  27. Whiney bitches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get an ipad and shut up.

  28. Don't Do It! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never buy the lifetime warranty!

    You don't want to lose your life over a consumer product!

  29. Uninformed at best by linuxhansl · · Score: 1, Insightful
    This is nonsense. Warm air carries more moisture than cold air. When taking a cold device into a warm room, the air will enter the device, cool down and water will start to condensate inside the device. Water from condensation is just as bad as water from a spill.

    The liquid sensor is right to go off, as it should since many electronic gadgets/laptops were destroyed this way.

    1. Re:Uninformed at best by hidden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But that condensation occurs under normal use, so the device should be designed with it in mind.

    2. Re:Uninformed at best by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The liquid sensor is right to go off, as it should since many electronic gadgets/laptops were destroyed this way.

      Either Apple needs to properly gasket the thing / seal the affected components, or be very up front that their products cannot be used in these very common weather conditions.

      To expect a phone to fail because it's used in the winter is beyond any reasonable expectations.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  30. Why not make it waterproof? by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    Really what is the problem?

    Your typical keyboard is quite waterproof. I've spilled coffee on mine several times. Into the dishwasher it goes. I let it dry for about a week and then it's just fine. (Yes I have a backup keyboard). I have done this several times now and the keyboard still works fine.

    1. Re:Why not make it waterproof? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And along these lines, does anyone make a waterproof smartphone? Extra points for dual-SIM capability, I'm going to want that for the next few years.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Why not make it waterproof? by adolf · · Score: 1

      No.

  31. Acidental Damage Protection by OneFix · · Score: 1

    I hate to say it, because it's also a scam, but this won't matter if you buy an ADP plan that includes spills/immersion (SquareTrade sells them for all kinds of phones).

    It doesn't matter who you buy it from though, if they know all you have to do to force them to fix it is to pay a $50 deductible, they are less likely to claim mishandling.

    It's not fair, but they know if you don't have that insurance, you have no choice but to buy a new phone.

  32. iphone marketing strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple wants you to buy expensive waterproof sleeves for your iPhones so your warranty wont get void! Apple gets revenues from customers buying waterproof sleeves!

  33. It's condensation by Ocyris · · Score: 1

    My dad had a similar experience with a Sony water resistant camera however the result were quite opposite. It was about 80-90 degrees out and he dunked the camera in 50 degree water hoping to get a close up of some trout. That ended up condensing the air inside the lens fogging it up on the inside. When he contacted Sony about it they were very interested in getting the camera to investigate the problem and fix it on future models as well as replacing it at no cost.

  34. Effect on warranty? by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1

    Are there any cases of people actually being refused service because one of these sensors has been tripped?

    1. Re:Effect on warranty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Very common in Singapore.

      If you travel to Singapore, you should take a trip to Singtel's iphone service center at Comcentre SingtelShop.

      The queue is long, and the service staff treats their customers like criminals. When it is your turn, you have to hand over your iphone to them, they'll use a touch light to shine on the headphone jack and charging port (where the liquid sensors are) and stare hard at them for a few seconds. After that, they ask you: "What is your problem?"

      If they see anything red, their official reply is: "Your phone is water damaged. You have to pay SGD350 for servicing." Even for software problems!

    2. Re:Effect on warranty? by daveime · · Score: 1

      However, in Singapore, it's also common for people to be fined for not smiling at tourists, and to be shot at dawn for chewing gum or smoking.

      Perhaps you have some anecdote about iPhone Centers in North Korea or Iran you'd like to share with us, for a really unbiased comparison.

    3. Re:Effect on warranty? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Yep. This is especially true if you buy the phone in some small repair and sales cell phone shops.

      If the water damage paper is red you are SOL and will need to buy a new phone. Its standard practice in many shops and a great money maker.

    4. Re:Effect on warranty? by Wovel · · Score: 1

      You know of an iPhone that was refused warranty service by Apple?

  35. -11C ? (warning - flames ahead) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, they placed the iPhone in its box for one hour outside at -11 C,

    I think maybe they should put the USERS outside at -11C

    By the way, expressing common measurements like this, in units that are so stupidly useless is my main beef with the metric system. WTF is a negative degree in this context?

    and before you mod me down - (Romer didn't like using negative numbers in his weather logbook EITHER!)

    1. Re:-11C ? (warning - flames ahead) by Thundarr+Trollgrim · · Score: 1

      How is relating a temperature to an observable, known temperature (Like the freezing point of water, for instance) in any way useless?

    2. Re:-11C ? (warning - flames ahead) by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      I think maybe they should put the USERS outside at -11C

      For users, -11C is not a documented working temperature.

      By the way, expressing common measurements like this, in units that are so stupidly useless is my main beef with the metric system. WTF is a negative degree in this context?

      A negative degree is a temperature where water freezes. This means, at negative temperatures you have to expect

      • glace
      • bottles freezing and breaking
      • precipitation will go down as snow
      • existing snow will not melt

      It's the single most useful distinction there is. Going outside an -2C and going out at +2C is very different. Going out at +8C and going out at +12C is not too different.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  36. The obvious answer by __aaoyac5342 · · Score: 1

    Don't buy an iPhone, problem solved.

  37. So.. do we just love to hate things.... by iceT · · Score: 1

    Sure... the HCI in the audio jack could change color. That's why there is supposedly a SECOND HCI on the inside of the unit. They'll open it up to examine the second one as well... 2 spots.. relatively far apart... and the 2nd one would probably be less subject to condensation.

     

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
  38. Orwell 1984 by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 0

    I can't quite figure out if this is flamebait, or if I'm just the only person who can't make a connection between liquid sensors in a consumer electronic device and a dystopian police state.

    Orwell wrote a couple other things besides 1984. Just sayin'. . .

  39. every cell phone ever by prodigal_phreak · · Score: 1

    so, i haven't noticed a comment stating that every cell phone you've ever owned probably had the same sensor inside. The triggering of that sensor voided it's warranty as well.

  40. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have queried Apple Support in Singapore about this.

    This is my post on another forum on 12-01-2010
    The $350 stated below is in SGD.

    ---
    It is official. TS got pwned.

    Just talked to an Apple Support person at 800-186-1087. My comments in [ ].

    She is very firm that:

          1. LSI turn pink/red means no warranty. Even for non water related damages 1 year later. No Warranty.
          2. They won't do anything if LSI turn pink/red, and the phone is perfectly ok, and no trace of water.
                You can continue to use your phone as usual, just no more warranty.
          3. You cannot return the product to get a refund if you don't agree to this policy.
                [and they didn't even state point 1 (above) clearly in their own "Water damage is not covered by warranty" page]
          4. Out of warranty "repairs" is a flat fee of $350 to change the whole phone.
                Even for any minor issues like a button drop off.

    She said that

            * the LSI system is a world wide system used by everyone. It is not an Apple invention.
                [don't blame Apple for this unfair policy. Everyone does it!]
            * there is a certain threshold for the LSI to trigger, but she cannot say what is the threshold.
                [so it is up to everyone to speculate what is the threshold, and how reliable
                is the LSI thingy (false positive rates?)]
            * the indicators are inside the phone.
                [potato chips inside an open bowl will not turn soggy! they are inside the bowl!]

    So victims will need to go to Small Claims Tribunals.
    http://app.subcourts.gov.sg/sct/index.aspx

    For those that seems to be more protective towards Apple than the consumers, don't worry.
    True water damage will show up with other evidences when you open up the chassis. There are another 2 LSI indicators inside the chassis. Water will leave stains in the interior of the chassis. Singaporeans are rich enough to prefer paying $350, then to go through the hassle of submitting documents and attending court hearings. So I think Apple can laugh all the way to the bank by being firm.

    For consumers, your argument is weak if you show someone a damaged phone and red LSI at the same time. But they don't care if you show a dry and functional phone and a red LSI. So it is LLST all the way.

    ----

    http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/showthread.php?t=2629267

  41. Not Surprising by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

    This is actually already fairly well "documented," that LCIs aren't what one would call reliable. This happens a lot with other types of phones' LCIs - for example, I was able to change my liquid detection strip in my Nokia, albeit just a corner of the square, after having my phone sit on the bathroom shelf while I showered. Sure, a steam-filled room might not be the BEST place for a phone, but it shouldn't void my warranty either. And no surprise that Apple wouldn't use anything beyond the same detection methods, especially when they get to cry foul and turn a blind eye to your issues because a tiny piece of paper turned red. They're going to get you any way they can, and this is one of those "that's how they get you" ways.

  42. Take it in to get the red strip replaced.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the sensor is reading a false positive, can't you take it in to get replaced...If enough people do this maybe they will re-think even using it....

  43. Working Outside in Summer by kipin · · Score: 1

    I happen to sweat a decent amount. In the summer, if I keep my phone in my pocket, it will trip the sensor. What am I supposed to do to prevent that from happening?

    --
    If I can not smoke in heaven, then I shall not go. -- Mark Twain
  44. How does apple actually respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, I understand the somewhat conspiracy-theory concern over the fact that the sensors are too sensitive and give false positives. And frankly, I agree with you. But how is Apple actually using the sensor? Are there reported cases of Apple refusing warranty over false positives from the sensor? Or do they simply use it as an indicator when debugging and looking for possible problems? If they use it as the final answer, then that is wrong, but if they use it as only one piece of a larger puzzle, that seems completely reasonable.

    1. Re:How does apple actually respond by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Apple, but I know somebody who had a Motorola phone that had stopped working properly, and the warranty was refused simply because the sensor had been tripped, although he asserted that the phone had never once been in contact with any water. The only explanation that the person I know had was that it had been triggered by sufficient exposure to varying outdoor and indoor temperatures that it happened to produce enough condensation for the sensor to have been considered tripped. He tried bitching about it. They refused to make any exceptions to their policy at the outlet where he had bought the phone, and he was stuck having to buy a whole new phone (also a Motorola, btw, which I laughed at him for doing later).

  45. Re:Orwell 1984 by NoMaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Very true. For instance, by applying methods first outlined in the paper "Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis" (Statistical Science 9: 429-438) to Orwell's Animal Farm, I discovered the following statement appears no less than 16 times!

    "Android good, iPhone Bad!"

    --
    What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  46. Dude... no joke by joocemann · · Score: 1

    I live in a coastal humid and mediocre temperature weather area... I have *never* gotten my phone right into water... not even in the rain; I don't use them in the rain.

    And yet every single battery-area 'got it wet indicator' that turns red when you get it wet.... yep.. every single one would be triggered and appear like I got it wet or something. I'm not even talking about putting em in sweaty or wet clothes or something, either... I'm pretty careful and this happens usually within the first couple months of owning a phone.

  47. Nobody exposes the phone to cold for this duration by yelirekim · · Score: 1

    If you keep the thing in your pocket there shouldn't be nearly that much of a problem, you would have to regularly be talking on the thing for an hour at a time in cold weather to reproduce this.

  48. 855,000 cell phones into the toilet each year - UK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    £342m of mobiles dropped in toilet
    Brits drop 855,000 mobile phones into the toilet each year
    Tuesday, 05, Jun 2007 09:15
    http://www.myfinances.co.uk/insurance/news/-342m-of-mobiles-dropped-in-toilet-$474415.htm

    Britons are dropping 855,000 mobile phone handsets into the toilet every year - worth a collective £342 million.

    But that is just a fraction of the 4.5 million handsets lost and damaged every year, making mobile phone insurance more useful than many say.

  49. AIRstrip One, not WET strip one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly Slashdotter.
    Orwell only had Airstrip One not some strip that detected water.

  50. What really happens... by bakons · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a technician at a rival company to ATT in the US, I can tell you that the LDI or LCI is usually just that, an indicator. We see one of those tripped and then dig deeper into the device to see if there is further evidence that the device has been exposed to abnormal conditions, like a toilet. Some of the non-full service stores may not look so deep, but all of ours will take a device completely out of it's housing before making the determination. We're really not out to screw the customer, unless he's a douche.

  51. Flying aspidistras - there's an app for that! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Orwell wrote a couple other things besides 1984. Just sayin'. . .

    Are you saying the iPhone won't work if you're inside a whale? Can clergymen's daughters get a discount?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  52. Way way back in the UK by goldcd · · Score: 1

    as the operators were starting up, Orange came along as a new entrant. The monthly charge was a little bit more expensive, but they did have beautifully simple contracts (I paid £30 a month, I got x many minutes and if I didn't go over that, my bill was £30). That £30 also included a quite wonderful warranty. If ANYTHING happened to your phone, it broke, it got lost, you'd gone swimming with it in your pocket etc - you just called them up (and they answered pretty much immediately) and with no quibble, the next day there'd be a courier at the door with a replacement phone to swap out (or give if the phone had gone AWOL).
    It all went wrong about 5 years back (roughly) when all manner of weird policies started appearing - in my case my p800 broke, which seemingly required their smart phone dept to authorize the return, except neither I or the rep I was calling could actually find out why it took a month for them to accept the phone in my hand was dead etc - so I left them after 5 or 6 happy years.
    I'd love to know why they changed. Might have been their takeover, might have been the policy was costing them too much money, might have been they wanted to just lower their up-front prices to appear competitive. There's just something rather lovely about a contract where you know "Every month I will be paying £x, and as long as I pay £x a month I will never be more than 24 hours without a phone, whatever happens."

    1. Re:Way way back in the UK by jimicus · · Score: 1

      They were bought out by a company with serious financial issues.

  53. Allow me to fix it for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless he's a douche bag. There, fixed it for you. And like you are a rival. You can't compete, face it -- douche bag!

  54. solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't you just dry it out using the warm glow of a mac users self smugness?

  55. Upgrade the humidity detector? by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

    Would it be feasible to replace a defective humidity detector with an aftermarket component that performs the function more accurately and with fewer false positives?

    I am not a lawyer, but according to Magnuson-Moss, this seems like it should be within your rights.

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    1. Re:Upgrade the humidity detector? by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      What's to stop someone replacing the LCI, then, AFTER water damage has occured, in order to defraud Apple by showing that their 'third-party' water detector hasn't detected contact with water. I really don't know the specifics of the Magnuson-Moss act, and don't care to try to decipher it since I'm not a lawyer and any opinion I have on that matter would be worthless. But, seems like any common-sense approach to the situation indicates that that the whole point of having such an indicator is that it must be continuously in use from the time of sale. Any replacement by anyone other than an Apple service employee would render it moot.

  56. You are my density by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.
    The Liquid Contact Indicators all indicate when in contact with liquid.
    You realize condensation is a liquid, right?

    1. Re:You are my density by bashibazouk · · Score: 1

      First off: Duh! I get how LCI's work. I'm asking if other phones will suffer the same effect or are they somehow better sealed or insulated against environmental extremes. And if not then why is this specifically leveled against Apple and not the cell phone industry as a whole?

      O' dense AC...

  57. Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liquid Contact Indicators indicate contact with liquid.
    Condensation is liquid.
    It takes a fair bit to turn the indicator.
    People living in cold climates usually have enough experience to understand that electronic devices are best kept in an inside pocket.

    The Indicator is used as an obvious sign that water damage may have occurred.
    If you ask a support droid about it over the phone, of course they are going to tell you it voids the warranty.

    They have no way of examining the phone to confirm, so they have to err on the side of most likely case - which is water damage.

    However; I have taken more than one Iphone that I knew for a fact had been abused and had likely water damage to the Apple Store and had it replaced under warranty.

    The tragically hip chick at the "Genius Bar" listened to the problem description, ran a diagnostic which confirmed hardware malfunction that explained the problem I described, checked the LCI and advised that she'd have to crack the case to determine if the water exposure contributed to the failure, and took the phone into the back for a moment.

    Two minutes later, she came back and announced that there was no internal sign of water damage, and handed me a new phone and a work order to sign.

    Everything worked exactly as it should.

    Now I'm not a fanboi by any means - I'm just the PC Slob who has to truck all of my employer's mac crap in for repair when they manage to break it.

    You couldn't get me to switch from my Win Mobile phone to an Iphone for anything.

    We've had an unusually high number of Iphone failures - and that's even discounting the two guys who I know are abusive to their gear.

    Still, with the Iphone I can get immediate resolution at the Apple Store.
    I've been prepared to eat the repair cost numerous times - it's often clearly our fault rather than a defect - but have never had to do so.

    The Stepford feel of an Apple Store still creeps me out, but the folks at the Genius Bar are typically technically competent to the level required.

    Anymore - that's high praise.

    The only time they've failed me is when they offered to try to recover the data from a failed partition for $99.

    Figuring in the cost of my time, that would be a bargain, so I jumped on it.
    Got a call from them the next day advising that they were unable to recover anything.
    I was able to get it all back myself except for a couple of junk files, but it did take several hours.
    There was no charge, so they just wasted a little bit of my time.
    Overall, I can live with that.

  58. Re:Orwell 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it should be

    "iPhone good, Android better!"

  59. No, "gregarious" was right.. by valdis · · Score: 1

    "Do not taunt Happy Fun LCI". ;)

  60. Internal LCIs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Big whoop, they can trip the headphone jack indicator.

    What about the ones on the actual inside of the phone? You know, the ones on the damageable components?

  61. Re:Nobody exposes the phone to cold for this durat by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Untrue. My phone's sensor was visibly a different color within two months of my buying a brand new phone. I think it's caused less by usage outdoors and more by condensation that happens bringing it indoors after I've been outside (in colder weather) for a while. I've had no problems with my phone so far, but it sucks to know that the company won't honor the warranty (which is actually going to be up before the summer anyways) if something does happen to go wrong with it before the warranty is up (I know this because I asked them about it when I first noticed the sensor was a different color, hoping to get some peace of mind about it and instead all I got was "you're on your own").

  62. Yeah, I know, Wikipedia is almost as evil as Apple by Lars+T. · · Score: 1
    What more proof do we need than what it says about the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humidity#Effects_on_electronics

    A particular danger to electronic items, regardless of the stated operating humidity range, is condensation. When an electronic item is moved from a cold place (eg garage, car, shed, an air conditioned space in the tropics) to a warm humid place (house, outside tropics), condensation may coat circuit boards and other insulators, leading to short circuit inside the equipment. Such short circuits may cause substantial permanent damage if the equipment is powered on before the condensation has evaporated. A similar condensation effect can often be observed when a person wearing glasses comes in from the cold. It is advisable to allow electronic equipment to acclimatise for several hours, after being brought in from the cold, before powering on. The inverse is also true.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  63. Condensate is a noun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half a dozen posters here have said "This causes water to condensate inside the phone" or something equivalent.

    Please don't do this.

    "Condensate" is a noun, not a verb. The verb is "condense." Using "condensate" in this context is just silly, since we have a perfectly good word in the form of "condense".

    In before "verbing a noun is perfectly cromulent."

  64. Gee, look at that... by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    Yet another generic phone story slapped as "iPhone" to improve SEO hits. The little stickers with powdered red dye is them have been in every phone I've ever seen for almost 10 years now.

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    1. Re:Gee, look at that... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      No way! It is an evil Apple Orwellian Plot thinger cause Jobs is the Devil!

      The true irony is that Apple is one of the few companies that would more likely than not ignore the little red sticker and replace your phone anyway.

  65. Mucho ado about.. by Wovel · · Score: 1

    Has anyone had a sensor turn red from normal use and then had their phone subsequently break and then been refused warranty service?

    *chirp* *chirp* *chirp*