Slashdot Mirror


Is the Line-in Jack On the Verge of Extinction?

SlashD0tter writes "Many older sound cards were shipped with line-out, microphone-in, and a line-in jacks. For years I've used such a line-in jack on an old Windows 2000 dinosaur desktop that I bought in 2000 (600 Mhz PIII) to capture the stereo audio signal from an old Technics receiver. I've used this arrangement to recover the audio from a slew of old vinyl LPs and even a few cassettes using some simple audio manipulating software from a small shop in Australia. I've noticed only recently, unfortunately, that all of the four laptops I've bought since then have omitted a line-in jack, forcing me to continue keeping this old desktop on life support. I've looked around for USB sound cards that include a line-in jack, but I haven't been too impressed by the selection. Is the line-in jack doomed to extinction, possibly due to lobbying from vested interests, or are there better thinking-outside-the-box alternatives available?"

411 comments

  1. I Don't Know What You're Talking About by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My netbook (months old) has a line in jack. My motherboard (1 year old) has a line in jack. In fact, the software drivers for my motherboard allow me to decide what I plug into each of the three jacks even though it's Realtek crap software. Hell, I think I could have three line-in 1/8" jacks if I wanted to. From what I can tell, the most popular Dell desktop is the Inspiron 560. I hate to sound like a salesman but not only do you get 7.1 surround sound at $350 but you also get a line in jack. They even suggest you "Use the (blue) line-in connector to attach a record/playback device such as a cassette player, CD player, or VCR. On computers with a sound card, use the connector on the card."

    So that leaves us with some interesting cases:
    1. Something is very rotten in the state of Australia and their recent Think of the Children campaign has gone to new lengths to prevent people from transmitting sexy audio.
    2. You are very adept at selecting some models of computers that have no line-in jacks from a sea of computers with line-in jacks.
    3. You actually have a line-in jack, you just are confused with the colors (please don't take this as an insult, I've helped family members through this before). You also might have better drivers allowing you to make one of the jacks a line-in jack but you don't realize it.
    4. Look closer at your sound card. Does it say "Sorny" or "Panaphonics" on it? Buying computers from a kangaroo in an alleyway will get you what you pay for.
    5. Your tinfoil hat is on so tight you can't see the back ports on your computer.

    Look, if you could give us more information like what operating system you use and what motherboards you're using, I'd be willing to track down the manuals on them and verify there's no line-in jack and take a boomerang to the head if I'm mistaken. But couldn't this problem have been solved with a couple bucks? My eeePC netbook has a line-in. I really don't see them disappearing at all.

    P.S. If you're looking for something a little more professional, external Audigys and M-Audio Pre USBs are useful for what you're doing though they are pricey ($200 USD).

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Informative

      SOLVED.

      Now give me +5. Of course, there are many other ways to record a line-in, but it sounds to me like submitter is very finicky and used to doing things one specific way. I have family who use a dual-deck CD burner because they're used to the whole tape-deck way of recording. They would rather make a mix CD by sticking 1 CD at a time and burning track-by-track than simply ripping all of their music to their $800 laptop(which they use only for internet and OpenOffice) and burning mix CD's from the library. I'll get off your lawn now.

    2. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Pojut · · Score: 1

      ^^^Pretty much this. There are other options out there just for vinyl if you are concerned about noise from using an analog input.

    3. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative

      SOLVED.

      That's sold out, $35 and possibly not available in Australia. However, after viewing that, it has occurred to me what has happened here. The submitter is used to (what I learned to call) RCA jacks in stereo. These I guess are two jacks looking like this. I believe what the submitter needs is only one of these adapters that will run you a few bucks at your local store (unless you're finicky about quality which I'm guessing he's not if he's doing this on that old of a computer).

      Yes, the large RCA version of it is going the way of the buffalo and probably has for some time. Similar to the new video out ports looking smaller and smaller but being essentially the same standard.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    4. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mariushm · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he just needs to upgrade to a better soundcard, geared towards semi-professionals and professionals. For example M-Audio is a company known to produce produces quality soundcards with multiple input and output jacks and break out boxes.
      Here's the category page: http://www.m-audio.com/index.php?do=products.family&ID=recording
      You can find PCI cards, USB sound cards and even Firewire devices on that page.

      Otherwise, there are still plenty of sound cards with line-in, including USB ones: http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=Property&Subcategory=57&Description=&Type=&N=2010290057&srchInDesc=line&MinPrice=&MaxPrice=

    5. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by SillySixPins · · Score: 1

      The submitter is used to (what I learned to call) RCA jacks in stereo. These I guess are two jacks looking like this. I believe what the submitter needs is only one of these adapters that will run you a few bucks at your local store (unless you're finicky about quality which I'm guessing he's not if he's doing this on that old of a computer).

      That's the answer. I wonder why RCA is leaving us though?

    6. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

      That seems extremely unlikely... I've only seen a couple computers with RCA ports ever.

    7. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by beav007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Doesn't that then make the assessment more likely?

    8. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't recall ever having an RCA line-in jack on any vanilla computer, unless I installed a high-end consumer sound card like some of the "pro" Sound Blasters or an actual professional sound card like an RME Hammerfall or M-Audio Audiophile or Delta.

      Because I'm a media producer, I've got all sorts of devices for inputting audio into computers, from simple 1/4" to USB guitar cables (no kidding!) to multi-thousand dollar Apogee A/D converters. You can now get a device that will do 24bit/192kHz sound recording for a computer for less than $100 (and throw in a phantom power microphone preamp to boot). The choices have never been greater.

      And yes, unless you're hung up on the shape of the little gizmo that plugs into the little hole, every computer from laptop to Mac Pro has a way to input audio (aka "line-in") jack. Sometimes, the jack actually does double duty as mic-in and line in, and the little mixer applet that comes with it will attenuate or boost the signal accordingly.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's easy: the connectors are bigger, and there are two of them. The result is higher cost. 1/8" phono jacks are probably cheaper (esp. since you only need one), can handle both L and R on one jack, and take up much less space. As a result, it's easy to stick a phono jack on the back of a computer motherboard, or even on a notebook computer, but adding dual RCA jacks to a computer usually means adding an extra expansion-port plate.

      The only downside is that stereo phono jacks have more noise than separate RCA jacks, since the L and R signals are not isolated from each other in the cable and can have crosstalk. Of course, most people can't hear well enough to notice, or simply don't care, so for 99% of users, phono jacks are better.

      Of course, if the noise issue is a problem for you, you can buy an RCA-to-phono Y adapter cable. It's not quite as good as true RCA jacks, but by using separate RCA cables instead of a stereo phono cable, you'll eliminate most of the noise since the noise is mostly created in the cable, and the lack of separation in the jack won't affect it much. Besides, PCs tend to be rather noisy anyway, and poor environments for audio signals; all the other electrical noise inside the case affects the audio signals in the analog portion of the circuitry before it gets to the audio chip. A well-designed PC would have shielding to prevent this, such as a separate PCI card with a metallic shielding box around it, but there aren't many PCs with that attention to detail.

    10. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Bengie · · Score: 1

      my Realtek, recent within 2 years, EVERY port works as either a mic or stereo out, and it's not mono mic, but supports stereo in. It auto detects the ports and lets me configure which port does what.

    11. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mjwx · · Score: 1

      He's buying notebooks, no laptop I've seen has ever had a line in jack, most have microphone jacks but no line in. There's probably a few models with them but none I've seen.

      However almost every ATX mainboard I've bought over the last few years has had line in and line out. mATX usually don't but a few do have line in.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    12. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by aitikin · · Score: 1

      Quality soundcards is a bit of an overstatement. Not to mention drivers can be a bitch.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    13. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mirix · · Score: 1

      TFS seems to be rambling on about laptops though, and I've never seen a laptop with RCA connectors, ever.

      That said, every:
      A) Motherboard with onboard sound
      B) Soundcard
      C) Laptop
      I've ever purchased has a line-in jack on it, so I'm really quite confused as to what the problem is.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    14. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by luder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, man... Look what I just found in one of the suggested products page:

      Pull it out, and give it a twist, and a super-bright highly focused white spotlight shines into the darkest corners.

      :-D

    15. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      My SX-64 doesn't have an RCA in, or an audio input of any sort. The Commodore 16 has an RCA jack, but that's video out.

      The only machine I've seen with an RCA jack for input is my Thinkpad Type 2635. It has an RCA jack with a microphone icon next to it (a general "line in", I guess).

      My Adlib card has a 1/4" phono jack, though, which is amusing.

      Alright, that's just blabbing about amusing hardware history.

      Is the submitter really talking about RCA jacks? I don't think so.

    16. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      My laptop has a microphone jack and a line-in. Of course, it's a ThinkPad, so YMMV.

    17. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by TemporalBeing · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a lot of SoundBlaster cards that have them - Awe64 Gold, SBLive!, Audigy2, just to name a few series.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    18. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Most laptops, the mic-in doubles as the line-in. Give the person asking the question a "-1 didn't RTFM" and a "-1 didn't try the obvious."

      Just because it isn't an RCA jack doesn't mean it doesn't do the same job. What next "OMG - none of the 4 laptops I own have an CGA/EGA port so I can't plug an external monitor into it"? "How come I can't plug my old Nintendo cartridge games into my Wii?" "Where's the cassette tape interface to load my BASIC game?"

    19. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Demonantis · · Score: 1

      I like how he is complaining that it is not a stock option anymore. Maybe there was a time when every one wanted one and manufacturers replied with giving it to them. Why should the manufacturer include it when it is not important to peoples choice in computers. Its like floppy drives being phased out. Its not some CD cartel conspiracy. Just manufacturers responding to consumer interests. I have one on a computer I bought a year ago, but thats a media computer. Still I would say you can get one if you want to. Laptops are probably the least likely to have it because all parts are considered more carefully.

    20. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      RCA was NEVER common on PC sound cards simply because with the fact you need two of them for stereo you'd never get all the connections a typical PC soundcard has on the expansion slot plate. Also they barely fit on the backplate which may cause issues with some cases.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    21. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Why should he have to bother with a "pro" card to get a feature that was present on the 8 bit Sound Blaster?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    22. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      With thinking like that we might as well remove the audio interface entirely.

      That sounds vaguely familiar actually...

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    23. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Click on link]

      "$34.99 Out of stock"

      Doh! Almost solved.

    24. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Kagetsuki · · Score: 1

      Ditto, I've got 8 computers purchased within the last year in my immediate vicinity (I'm in an office) of different makes and 3 different brands, 4 notebooks 4 desktops, and only one does not have a line-in jack (it's a NetWalker Z1, a palmtop but a computer none the less). Perhaps SlashD0tter should start purchasing computers from a different company. For notebooks I recommend Toshiba (high end) or Fujitsu (mid range/business), Sharp or Kohjinsha for netbooks, and desktops I have gone for BTO from services that offer full warranties (like Cleverly in Japan) but we just got some HP (Japan) workstations for an incredible price and they are really great boxes.

      Now, line-in is fine and all... but do we really still need phone jacks?

    25. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Obfuscant · · Score: 0
      The only downside is that stereo phono jacks have more noise than separate RCA jacks,

      Sigh. RCA jacks are PHONO jacks. The small connector on the end of your earphones is a PHONE plug, either 1/2 inch, 3.5mm, or 2.5mm.

      PhonO jacks are harder to use because they are a full friction fit, thus are intended for longer term connections even though they tend to suffer from corrosion and oxidation. PhonE jacks are simple to use and usually considered self-cleaning, for short term connections. They slide in easy and have a click-fit.

      but by using separate RCA cables instead of a stereo phono cable, you'll eliminate most of the noise since the noise is mostly created in the cable,

      Noise is more due to the sometimes poor grounding of a PHONE connector (there is no compression fit like the PHONO connector has) than the cable, and you can get good cables with PHONE connections on the end. OTH, RCA connectors often corrode while in use and need a few twists every so often to regain contact. That's not a function of the cable, either.

    26. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mrcleaver · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I second this. Soundblaster cards, as crappy as Creative is, have good jack support. I have a Xi-Fi platinum (with the front panel headers) and it has line in jacks, multiple microphone jacks, optical in / optical out etc. I don't know what their cards are like these days but I'm sure they'll have one with the RCA jacks.

      Also I just want to say the RCA type dual line in jacks have never been popular on sound cards as far as I know

    27. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Shudder ...

      Nope. Still too soon. Just reading the letters "SBLive!" sent a flood of nauseating memories through my consciousness ... broken drivers, bluescreens, corrupted windows installations, and oh so many lost hours.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    28. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anarki2004 · · Score: 1

      I found that a great method is purchasing a UCA-202 from Behringer for about $30 - oh well crap. Looks like thats what you were linking to. Carry on.

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    29. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anarki2004 · · Score: 1

      If that adaptor doesn't do the trick and the thinkgeek site is sold out, musician's friend and all the other major music stores will certainly have it in stock.

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    30. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by srodden · · Score: 1

      You can buy USB audio input devices like that on ebay easily and/or from various white goods retailers that have a computer section too (though they tend to be overpriced from such vendors IMO).

      --
      Why can't we let people believe whatever they like? It's not like a little religion has ever hurt anyone.
    31. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mrcleaver · · Score: 1

      Bah, I just checked and it looks like creative no longer sells the card that I have, and they don't have anything really comparable

    32. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by rcw-home · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only downside is that stereo phono jacks have more noise than separate RCA jacks, since the L and R signals are not isolated from each other in the cable and can have crosstalk.

      It gets worse - most installations put the L and R speaker outputs in the same room!

    33. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      My Asus also has the Realtek 7.1 setup. I like being able to split front and rear inputs or outputs for separate playback and/or record. In the past I have not been a big fan of Realtek but this unit has been very nice for an on-board. The only thing I currently use Line In for is recording cell calls via a dual 3.5 (1/8") to single 2.5 (3/32") splitter, a wired hands free, and an adapted cord. Yes, it's legal in my state (as long as ONE party of the conversation is aware of the recording) and I don't need to do it often... but it is handy.

      Oh, I used to use the line in for recording sound from my Magnetbox TV.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    34. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Sure, he can check out ThinkGeek, but if he's like me, and has
      attention defici--oh look! Zombie Mints! 111!!!

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    35. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by aitikin · · Score: 1

      Not my post buddy. I was finding fault with the guy recommending m-audio, which I laugh at anytime someone calls pro anyway...

      Regardless, I wouldn't be using an 8 bit card for digitizing vinyl, I'm even suspicious using 16-bit. Furthermore, the idea of just RCA to 1/8" minijacks is missing a couple of things, particularly an RIAA (as much as I hated the organization) EQ (included in Audacity, however a real preamp and eq would make a difference). If there wasn't one in your Technics receiver, or one setup for it, it's probably going to be a big difference.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    36. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. My laptop, which about 1 year old, has a line-in and so does my external Creative Labs sound card (box?).

      He has a genuine "Magnetbox" methinx. Should have gone for the Carnivale.

    37. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shudder ...

      Nope. Still too soon. Just reading the letters "SBLive!" sent a flood of nauseating memories through my consciousness ... broken drivers, bluescreens, corrupted windows installations, and oh so many lost hours.

      How about SoundBlaster 16 (I still have the diver disk and I think I still have the card)

    38. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, I thought the OP was talking about having a separate mic and line in, which I've never seen on a laptop but are common on a desktop.

      But yes, give the OP a "-1 didn't do a simple Google search first" mod.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    39. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by LBt1st · · Score: 1

      The SB16 was possibly the only Good thing they ever made. Actually I'll correct that, most of their hardware has been pretty damn good. It's the software side of things that always ruined their products. Never again Creative, you got my last dollar many years ago.

    40. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      In most of the higher end laptops the line in jack is on the docking station. (Dell precision M60/70,
      HP NC8230 for example)

      It is quite right that most laptops do not have a line in, but some do.

    41. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by compro01 · · Score: 1

      My ancient Thinkpad A30 from 2000 had both mic and line in jacks.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    42. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by gnapster · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure that the submitter has the following dilemma: he wants to record stereo sound from a HI-FI (probably with stereo RCA jacks) and he is already using something equivalent to the adapter you mentioned to plug into the stereo line-in jack in his 'ancient' computer. The reason he uses the input labeled 'line in', rather than the input labeled 'microphone', is because the former allows stereo input and the latter only records one channel (mono). He either assumes or has tested and confirmed that all every 'microphone'-labeled audio input on his bevvy of laptops also has this mono disability.

      The three laptops at my house have single audio inputs. The HP and Toshiba units are labeled with microphones and the Macbook has a generic audio in. I have no idea whether any of them can handle stereo. I know that a microATX motherboard that I bought three years ago came with seperate line-in and microphone jacks.

      I think that if the submitter is worried about the age of his computer, he might consider getting a new desktop. The case on such a device won't have such a premium on input port real-estate.

    43. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Cillian · · Score: 1

      I have an audigy 2 ex and audigy 4 - both cards appear nearly identical, both with the external box things, giving me three line ins (two large phone (The first also usable as microphone) one double-phono), full size midi in and out, optical in and out, digital coax in and out, volume knob, microphone level knob as well as an IR receiver, 5.1 output, as good a quality as I can distinguish, an extra back-plate with RS232/joystick. Also, pretty winful linux support (not alll the trimmings but all the ins and outs work)

      --
      -- All your booze are belong to us.
    44. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mkrup99 · · Score: 0, Troll

      This reply is so mindbogglingly stupid that I just don't know what to say about it. The effect of stereo--the whole point of having two speakers--is that the sound originates from two separate places in the room, adding a spatial dimension to the sound. It's to give you a sense of placement of instruments/voices/noises/etc. within the room that you can't get from just one speaker. Crosstalk in the wire causes a certain amount of the same sound to come out of both speakers, thereby reducing the stereo effect. Please use common sense before you try to be a smartass.

    45. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Shudder ...

      Nope. Still too soon. Just reading the letters "SBLive!" sent a flood of nauseating memories through my consciousness ... broken drivers, bluescreens, corrupted windows installations, and oh so many lost hours.

      Shoulda been using DOS. Duh.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    46. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by OrangeCatholic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >Also I just want to say the RCA type dual line in jacks have never been popular on sound cards as far as I know

      But they should be. I never fail to break those dinky 1/8" connectors. It's just a cost issue and what people are "satisfied" with. Most people are fine with 1/8". Personally, I've been sick of them for years.

      RCA pre-molded cables are horrible. They use incredibly tiny amounts of wire, and an RCA cable is virtually guaranteed to break in time.

      But the RCA connector is great. It's a far-flung industry standard and you can make your own cables pretty easily. The connector is grounded and the channels isolated. It's a virtual drop-in replacement for a guitar patch (1/4").

      The only thing that's really better is XLR. And I wouldn't expect that on a sound card.

    47. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by ImNotAtWork · · Score: 1

      I've had good experiences with a number of turtle beach soundcards. http://www.turtlebeach.com/products/soundcards.aspx

      --
      open source sub sim. I might start coding again for this. http://dangerdeep.sourceforge.net/contribute/
    48. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by OrangeCatholic · · Score: 1

      Would you care to describe your problems with M-Audio? I've been interested in one for some time.

      I agree that 16-bit sound and 1/8" jacks are awfully generic. The only obvious step up is M-Audio. What are you using that's better?

    49. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Never again Creative, you got my last dollar many years ago.

      I too bought my last Creative card (an Audigy 2 ZS) many years ago, but it is so damn good, I'm still using it although my computers have changed several times. Given a tendency for motherboard manufacturers to provide ever fewer PCI slots, I wouldn't be surprised if I have to change my soundcard one day, purely because there's no hole for it any more.

    50. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He said outputs in the same room, not speakers. Also, it was a joke.

    51. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by danlip · · Score: 1

      Behringer UCA202 is a pretty good USB audio interface for $30. It has RCA rather than 1/8 inch jacks, but it's really easy to find adapters to convert between them. You might find something similar with 1/8 inch jacks.

      <smug>Or you could get a MacBook Pro which has line-in.</smug>

    52. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by danlip · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's easy: the connectors are bigger, and there are two of them. The result is higher cost. 1/8" phono jacks are probably cheaper (esp. since you only need one), can handle both L and R on one jack, and take up much less space. As a result, it's easy to stick a phono jack on the back of a computer motherboard, or even on a notebook computer, but adding dual RCA jacks to a computer usually means adding an extra expansion-port plate.

      Not to mention that most users think a single 1/8" stereo jack is far more convenient, and virtual all computer speakers use 1/8" plugs.

      The only downside is that stereo phono jacks have more noise than separate RCA jacks, since the L and R signals are not isolated from each other in the cable and can have crosstalk. Of course, most people can't hear well enough to notice, or simply don't care, so for 99% of users, phono jacks are better.

      If you really wanted to go pro and minimize noise you'd use a pair of balanced lines (TRS or XLR).

      p.s. not sure why you keep saying "phono", these jacks usually run at line level, which is not phono.

    53. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by rcw-home · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually I'm not so hot on the whole idea of installation of speakers in rooms. The walls cause horrible multipath.

    54. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Rophuine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember when I was cool because I had a SoundBlaster, and most of my friends were running Prince of Persia through an AdLib card or PC speaker.

    55. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      p.s. not sure why you keep saying "phono", these jacks usually run at line level, which is not phono.

      Sorry, I meant "phone" as another responder pointed out.

    56. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mysidia · · Score: 1
      It says:

      X Out of stock - This product is not available for purchase at this time.

      If the OP is correct about line-in being on the verge of extinction, then I guess they would be out of stock forever... queue up the conspiracy theories now :-)

    57. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Um... they actually ever made laptops or desktops with full-sized RCA jacks ?

      I've actually never seen one of those on a computer, ever, except possibly on a high-end sound card designed for stereo hookups.

      Mini-RCA for audio in and out is almost universal in the computing world

      There are some digital and optical audio in/out options, but they never seem to have caught on in PCs, probably because they're too expensive -- and the average PC user is just looking to hook up a pair of $5 speakers, a $0.30 microphone, and maybe an input from another soundcard or juke box.

    58. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Yoozer · · Score: 1

      What are you using that's better?

      Lots of stuff, depending on what you want to spend. MOTU, RME, Apogee Duet (cheap but Mac only), and above that are the real big money slurpers (the other Apogee stuff, Prism Sound, Metric Halo, Lucid etc.)

    59. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      But if they made one that was at all reasonably priced I'd buy an XLR soundcard in a heartbeat...

    60. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Most machines on the market today come with a microphone-in that is _sometimes_ usable as a Line-In. My EeePC 1000H was my last all-in-one with a line-in... neither of my Thinkpads have a Line-In that actually works as such in Windows 7.

      Of course, I've got interfaces to make up for that, but if you don't pick your laptops based solely on the crappy integrated audio, you've got about a 50/50 chance of getting a model with Line-In that works with the drivers available for your OS...

      Oh, and of course there's all those great laptops that have a line-in mentioned in the specs, but when you hook up an actual stereo line level signal, all you get is one side of the signal, with the added benefit of distortion and fun noise because the input is actually a mic in...

      I've got more than enough interfaces laying around, so at home this isn't a problem, but when you just want to hook up your laptop to the mixer's main outs to record a band practice or a gig for reference, having a line-in directly on a laptop is pretty nifty...

    61. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by bemymonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      And yes, unless you're hung up on the shape of the little gizmo that plugs into the little hole, every computer from laptop to Mac Pro has a way to input audio (aka "line-in") jack. Sometimes, the jack actually does double duty as mic-in and line in, and the little mixer applet that comes with it will attenuate or boost the signal accordingly.

      The trend in the last few years has been to forego the Line-In functionality. Often it's still mentioned in the tech specs, but try finding the software switch for activating the Line-In. Hell, the Realtek audio on my old Toshiba NB100 had a Line-In that only worked with certain driver versions... all of them would give you the pop-up for selecting whether you were using the jack as a line-in or mic-in, but only one of the drivers actually switched to stereo and padded the input (or turned off that nasty nasty preamplification).

      I don't get it - these laptops all have microphones built in. Why would you need a godawful preamp built in for an external mic that probably sounds just as crappy? It's not like there are any mics out there that sound any better and have a 1/8" TRS jack...

      Now an actual balanced 1/8" TRS connection with phantom power... that I could go for. But this crap is useless. Bring back the line-in and kill mic-in!

    62. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by bami · · Score: 1

      I have an Audigy 4 pro (I think you mean that, since you talk about the breakout box, the regular audigy 4 is just a re branded audigy 2 without the box), and I'm really wanting to switch to Linux for audio recording (since no ASIO is necessary), but I'm hesitant since:

      1) The drivers on XP are shoddy already (It always takes me a couple of tries to get it all working), so the drivers under Linux are okay? and
      2) I can't find good recording software that supports recording 6 simultaneous channels at a time. I'm pretty happy with my XP setup (ASIO2 + cubase 5 works wonderful) but I'd really like to move to linux since XP support is fading out, and I'm not interested in Windows 7. plus
      3) How will it work with the heaps of VSTi's I have.

      Also, what's currently the best distro for recording and editing music, both audio and midi through VSTi's.

    63. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " the $1,499 power cord, for which the reviewer states that "The choice of power cord one makes to transmit AC over the final feet to a component has the potential to be the most influential sonic link in a music system's power chain."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audiophile#Criticism_of_audiophile_marketing_practices

    64. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by tkrotchko · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've purchased that turntable, tried it and given it away to an enemy.

      I'm not a crazy stereophile by any means, but the quality of this turntable was so poor that you would not use this for any collectible vinyl, or anything worth keeping. The quality of construction is poor, the cartridge is utter crap, it was difficulty to set up the anti-skate, it tracked marginal vinyl not at all. In short, don't get this.

      Instead, just buy a used turntable in good condition (so many are available), or I realized my 40 year old Dual turntable ( http://www.dual-reference.com/ ) was still head and shoulders above this unit. Couple it with a reasonable phono preamp ( http://www.zzounds.com/item--ARTDJPREII ) and send it through your line in. Combine it with very nice free software ( http://audacity.sourceforge.net/download ) and you have a solution, possibly for as little as $50 and you'll have a turntable that won't ruin your good vinyl, and get excellent sound as well.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    65. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Why would you need a godawful preamp built in for an external mic that probably sounds just as crappy?

      Analog headsets.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    66. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Technician · · Score: 1

      I feel like a glutton. I have two of those and a quad offering from another company M-Audio. The quad supports higher bit rates, balanced inputs, and more than 16 bit recording. The better offerings can hardly be called inexpensive.

      Check ebay for the Berhinger U-Control. I picked one up for only $15.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    67. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      My Macintosh Performa had RCA line inputs... I think I had a 6400. I know the 8500 definitely has them too.

    68. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Amazon has them as well, for $5 less and with free shipping. I'm pretty sure they do free shipping as well. I've been using one of those, hooked up to one of these for about two years now. Flawless.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    69. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      That's actually a good point.

      However, why not just use headphones and the laptop's built-in mic? I can hardly imagine a scenario where the crappy mic in a headset would provide a better experience - unless there's tons of background noise, of course... in which case, you probably shouldn't be using a laptop for VoIP/whatever in that setting anyway :P

      I still have clip-on mics and headsets as well, but I don't think I've used them since I got rid of my desktop... the only usage scenario i can think of is gaming at a big LAN - lots of background noise because everyone's yakking away on their headsets :P

    70. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually I would say yours is an almost solved in that the link you had said out of stock and the price was too high. He can get the same rig for $29 at Amazon.

      But what I don't get is this: WTF is this doing in an ask slashdot at all? Hell my PC is less than a year old, and not the baddest board by ANY means, yet even my basic motherboard comes with software that lets you assign the input/output to be anything you want including line in, so WTF? What's next? I didn't read TFM so somebody here explain it to me? Even the old AC-97s would let you change inputs, and hell just about every board out there is based on Realtek designs.

      If you want something to write about here is something a little more important, at least for all of us running Windows 7 and/or Server 2K8-Apparently Win7/2K8 don't play nice with most KVM switches which means if you don't want to shitcan your KVM you are probably gonna have to shell out for one of these for each PC on your KVM which if you are using a 4 port or better is really gonna take a bite out of your wallet. It only seems to strike, at least for me, with LCD monitors, which is a PITA since I just got a nice 20 inch Dell given to me brand new as a thank you gift from a client. The best I can get thanks to this bug is 1440x900 instead of 1600x900 native! And for those running large server KVMs imagine how much it is gonna suck buying that damned many adapters to run 2K8.

      That to me is a better story than "I don't read manuals or bother to even look at feature lists before I buy...help!" which is pretty much what TFA is. Anybody could solve TFA in 30 seconds of Googling, whereas I've spent 2 days so far beating my head against the wall only to be told "buy more hardware dude" with the monitor bug. Man this bites.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    71. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      The submitter is complaining about laptops, and the Dell Latitude D630 I'm using right now is missing a line-in plug. My solution has been the Creative Xmod. You can get them fairly cheaply, and they don't need a driver so you can use them with any OS that supports USB audio. I've used it successfully for a number of one-off recording tasks similar to what the original poster is asking about. I've just re-read some of the original reviews, and I pretty much agree with them: You can use it as an amp for your MP3 player but you'll need a USB power adapter of some sort to power it, and don't use it for gaming.

      Oh and if you wind up buying one, go to Creative's web site and download the firmware upgrade, it enables monitoring of line-in recordings using the earphone jack: http://support.creative.com/Products/ProductDetails.aspx?catID=209&CatName=X-Fi&subCatID=668&subCatName=External+Solutions&prodID=15913&prodName=Creative+Xmod&bTopTwenty=1&VARSET=prodfaq:PRODFAQ_15913,VARSET=CategoryID:209

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    72. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Alsee · · Score: 1, Informative

      Pffft! If your worried about multipath distortion from walls then you obviously have a tin ear, and probably a $5-walkman quality sound system.

      Any true audiophile knows you can't hear the full richness and clarity of sound if you've got atmospheric distortion contaminating any part of your audio path. Insisting on vacuum tubes is just the first step in eliminating atmospheric distortion.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    73. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by ezzzD55J · · Score: 1

      I've purchased that turntable, tried it and given it away to an enemy.

      cool phrasing, I must remember that :)

    74. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Khyber · · Score: 1

      VSTi? Fruity Loops is what I'd use. I won't touch any version of FL higher than 3.56 though, so it's likely many newer VSTi won't work with older versions. Just like I won't move away from Cool Edit and upgrade to Audition. The added nonsense that I don't need and the extra bloat and subsequent slowdown in my creation process is not wanted.

      Pure MIDI composition I use Guitar Pro and add in whatever instrument patch I need.

      I've encountered much lag trying stock and kX drivers from live up to audigy 2 under linux. I've never worked it out. Switch to the onboard realtek, it works without lag.

      But then I don't get too much support and what tools are available to you might be dependent upon your distribution.

      Really any software can record to as many channels as you want, you just need the hardware capable of playing back that many channels.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    75. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Older SBLive! Platinums (gold series) with certain breakout boxes had XLR. I had one. I should have NEVER sold it. had to buy a mixer board to get XLR back.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    76. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Most laptop microphones SUCK BALLS. From my Toshiba Satellite C210 to my now-gone HP DV9825, the microphones built-in at maximum boost and recording level would barely pick me up from a foot away. I don't like screaming at a laptop.

      Now then, the new dv7 I have has microphones that pick EVERYTHING up, even if I turn on the garbage disposal on the other end of the house! It picks up the very faint hum of my air compressor (people think it's my desktop computer sitting next to the laptop,) and that's with boost 100% down and the recording volume level at 5 out of 100. (using windows 7)

      I would much prefer a plug-in analog pre-amp for a microphone dedicated to gaming, though. Seriously, many headset microphones are also crap and useless without a pre-amp of some sort.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    77. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "and I've never seen a laptop with RCA connectors, ever."

      Not surprising if your UID's anything to go by. RCA isn't just audio, RCA is a COMPOSITE cable and thus it would carry a video signal as well. You'd know this as 'the yellow jack next to the red and white ones' and if it wasn't included on the board it was almost always included as part of a breakout dongle cable included with the laptop if it were meant to have TV-out.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    78. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Older Compaq audiostations came with RCA connectors for audio and video. Ditto some SGI machines.

      Don't forget RCA can also carry a video signal (the yellow jack for VCRs/SNES) and was often included on older laptops when TV-out was a big feature.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    79. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by KeNickety · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't run phantom power on any kind of jack because when you insert the jack the contacts will bridge -ve signal to ground, shorting your phantom power.

    80. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Is there a surround sound setup that in addition to the usual front, side, and rear speakers also has them above?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    81. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      That's just it... using a mic that works with a laptop mic-in jack will rarely produce better results than the built-in microphone. Using an external preamp with a REAL microphone produces far better results, but without a line-in jack, you have nowhere to hook up that preamp...

      Obviously I'm not denying that most built-in laptop mics suck balls... they do... but so do pretty much all 1/8" jack headset/lapel mics. Moving closer to the mic on the laptop does the same thing.

    82. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      That's why you turn on phantom power after plugging in :)

      I'd settle for miniXLR too ;)

    83. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Again, this depends on the mic.

      I've had some battery-powered stand-alone microphones work awesomely with most any microphone jack in a laptop. Most headsets with built-in mics just seem to suck.

      It's a giant crap-shoot. Best thing you can do is hope someone leaks the specs on a machine (or you're lucky enough to have inside connections to specs) or wait for some other sucker to get one and run a review on it.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    84. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since the L and R signals are not isolated from each other in the connector and can have crosstalk.

      There, fixed that for you. Connector design is independent of cable design. I've seen RCA connectors hanging off the end of speaker wire before now. Buy decent cables (independent L and R shields) if you care about crosstalk in the cables.

    85. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by iainl · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing most people with a lot of records to rip to their computer already has a record deck. Probably, one a lot better than that piece of plasticky junk. A Pro-Ject Phono Box II or NAD PP3 would give you far, far better results, for about the same money, while also doubling as a phono-to-line-level preamp should their next hi-fi setup not come with a decent phono stage.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    86. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by karnal · · Score: 1

      Things like Voice Activation - as well as overall clarity - suffer with a built-in-to-the-laptop microphone. Not only can you hit the activation limit just by typing, but it also picks up every noise in the room. Furnace/AC fans etc create a ton of noise that the mic will pick up and boost.

      Generally even cheaper headsets have decent localization - they'll pick up close but the sensitivity at far range drops off quickly. They also have wind filters to hopefully catch people from popping their "P"s so much....

      --
      Karnal
    87. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      Try this one instead. Not all audio equipment gets better with price, but I have yet to see a low end turntable that worked worth its weight in lead. Also, make sure you get a good stylus. The ones that come with the players are usually pretty bad (the one with this table is okay, but if your records are in bad shape I recommend getting one by audio technica - they have been making them for a long time and it will help avoid skipping).

      --
      Get a web developer
    88. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      The noise overhead is insane.

      --
      Get a web developer
    89. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by aitikin · · Score: 1

      M-Audio is the Prosumer line. It's the attempt to make something that looks and feels pro, but is cheap enough for the consumer. As a sound guy, buying an M-Audio interface is tat amount to a tech professional with a need for a high quality server buying one of those mac mini servers and calling it a day. Their driver support is awful, half the time the units do not work as advertised. The sound is mediocre. And worst of all, their owned by Digidesign, which is owned by Avid. Digidesign's drivers are the closest thing I've found to a virus in OS X.

      That all being said, if you're looking at doing something like this, just get a decent sound card. Most will do 24-bit.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    90. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The only downside is that stereo phono jacks have more noise than separate RCA jacks

      Another downside is when the jacks get old, they wind up not working at all because of their small size; the little connectors bend from the weight of the plug. That said, I've never had a sound card with RCA jacks, but all you have to do when the flimsy little jacks wear out is replace the sound card, or the jack itself. Replacing the jack takes a soldering iron and a little more time, but it only costs a buck.

      the noise is mostly created in the cable

      Most of the noise is from the connection. If the cables are noisy it means the strands of wire inside have started to break and it's time to replace them. Cables are cheap, too.

      the lack of separation in the jack won't affect it much

      I haven't seen this problem, is it an audiophile "use $500 cables" thing? A good test of separation is the last song on Led Zeppelin III -- there is a guitar on one channel and voice on the other. Turn the balance all the way one way and all the way the other and just listen. If you can't hear the voice on the guitar side, or vice versa, you have no separation problem. I use this song as a convincer for people who are certain that analog has a separation problem; it doesn't.

      all the other electrical noise inside the case affects the audio signals in the analog portion of the circuitry before it gets to the audio chip

      Perhaps you can educate me -- how can Mz signals affect 22 kHz signals? The only audible signal inside the PC case would be the power supply, and I've never seen one that wasn't a good Faraday cage.

    91. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's easy: the connectors are bigger, and there are two of them. The result is higher cost.

      Yeah, but we're talking pennies here. You can get a couple of RCA jacks for a buck. If your sound is from a motherboard chip, it's trivial to change out the dinky little 1/8 stereo jack with a pair of RCA jacks.

    92. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every computer I've seen that has a 3.5mm stereo output also has a stereo input with the same fitting.

    93. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by X3J11 · · Score: 1

      RCA was NEVER common on PC sound cards simply because with the fact you need two of them for stereo you'd never get all the connections a typical PC soundcard has on the expansion slot plate.

      Creative AWE64

      I had the AWE64 Gold back in the day. It was a nice enough card for a Creative product, although I would have preferred a Gravis card at the time. RCA ports, on a common (or common enough) PC sound card. Granted, it was at the higher end, but I knew more than a few people who had some variant of this card.

      And if I remember rightly, even the shitty no-name card my aunt got in her machine (we both got almost identical P200's at the time) had RCA outs. Never say never.

    94. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      I too have an old battery powered Sony Electret Condensor microphone that works just fine with laptop mic-in jacks... but who would want to use one of those for voip? :P

      I just have a hard time believing that a mic-in jack is so much more important than line-in functionality that the former should take precedence... I'd go so far as to suggest a conspiracy ;)

    95. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Either you missed his joke, or I'm missing yours.

    96. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by 16Chapel · · Score: 1

      It's old now, but the Toughbook CF-27 definitely only has mono in (and stereo out).

    97. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by orasio · · Score: 1

      Look closer at your sound card. Does it say "Sorny" or "Panaphonics" on it? Buying computers from a kangaroo in an alleyway will get you what you pay for.

      I agree with your in the other points.
      In fact, knockoffs usually have more features than the originals.
      My chinese no-brand DVD player could play divx years before the recognized brands started to do it.
      Iphone knockoffs do everything the original does, and a lot more, like letting you install software, play regular media files, even watch air tv.

      You don't get what you pay for in features, the money from the expensive products goes to design, good plastic, QA and lawyers. Features are cheap. When you pay less, you can even get more features.

    98. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      there are many other ways to record a line-in, but it sounds to me like submitter is very finicky and used to doing things one specific way

      Exactly. Thread pretty much over with that statement.

      The poster is complaining about line-in jacks not being on LAPTOPS and USB addons. Newsflash - while it's still in relatively common use overall, MOST people aren't using their line-in jacks anymore - particularly not on a laptop which is a portable machine. It makes no sense to include them.

      If you WANT to use a line-in jack, there are countless $10 PCI sound cards (new production ones) that have that little feature (for the 1 in a million motherboard that doesn't already have it on a desktop PC).

      Face it: a seldom used feature is often removed from a portable device where space savings is at a premium. Just because you have to actually buy some specific equipment doesn't mean there's some nefarious plot to destroy analog input.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    99. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The RCA connector maybe physically okay but the whole idea of doing signal before ground connection is quite poor.

    100. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Lots of external USB/FireWire audio interfaces have XLR inputs (and sometimes even outputs). If you're doing "serious recording," you'll want to own such a device.

      Prices vary tremendously based upon the quality of the ADCs and preamps, although the cheap ones are still pretty good.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    101. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      From a do-it-yourself with a little solder and electrical tape point of view: RCA is easy to do yourself, from creating new cables to fixing broken ones. Trying to cut/splice/etc most cables used with 3.5mm is an exercise in frustration, and your better off buying a new set of headphones (or whatever) and explaining to your wife why the cat was "allowed" to chew on the cable of your semi-expensive present. (yes I know RCA plugs and heavy gauge cables would suck for headphones, but at least they could make them have 3.5mm plugs on both ends so you'd just have to replace the damn cable) As it is now it's a great way to keep the consumer buying a whole new item each time the cable gets nicked, or pulled, or even chewed.

    102. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by YouWantFriesWithThat · · Score: 1

      the M-Audio 1010LT has 2 XLR inputs, and there is a jumper on the card to determine if you want them to be line level or mic preamped. there are also a ton of other ins and outs. if you want XLR out, well, i haven't seen that either. but if this is what you are after, i have the 1010LT for years and i swear by it.

    103. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by operagost · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't run phantom power on any kind of jack

      You hard wire all your mics?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    104. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by YouWantFriesWithThat · · Score: 1
      it sounds like your problem is with the parent company, and you are making unverifiable complaints to back that up.

      half the time the units do not work as advertised...The sound is mediocre

      i have used a m-audio 1010lt for years and i have no idea what you could mean by that. the sound is not mediocre and the features of the sound card work. if you are going to bash a company like that, wouldn't it be more fair to be specific about which products you have a problem with and what the problem was.

      there are pro studios that dump a final mix onto a PC through that card's XLR ins. seen it with my own eyes. i suspect that your issue is that you think that you need to spend more to get a "better" audio interface. best blues i ever heard was on a pawnshop guitar, man.

      ...is tat amount to...

      oh an not to be a jerk, but i think that you were looking for tantamount the more you know, etc.

    105. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      If your headphone plug needs to be replaced, couldn't you instead replace it with a standard 1/4" TRS connector (the kind that fits into the big headphone jacks on most stereo gear)? There should be some kind of adapter you can buy which then converts the 1/4" plug into the smaller kind for plugging into your iPod.

    106. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      You must be buying the shittiest headsets you can find.

      My experience is that the boom mic that is part of even midgrade PC headsets will blow away any built-in laptop mic, or most desktop PC mics.

      Not counting desktop studio-grade mics here - of course these will be better, but they'll have a far more expensive total solution compared to a boom mic.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    107. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      RCA is just a connector.

      It's typically used in one of three configurations for home use:
      Red/White - Stereo audio only - most component audio systems used this before the advent of digital audio I/O between components
      Red/White/Yellow - Composite A/V - laptops would often have a breakout that would bring out the "yellow" but you'd need a 3.5mm-to-RCA Y-cable for Red/White. A lot of Dells had a breakout that would bring out "yellow" and "black" (composite video and digital audio - which is USUALLY orange and not black)
      Red/Green/Blue - Component video. Sometimes paired with another red/white pair for audio, but more commonly the audio is optical or coaxial digital.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    108. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Yes there has been the odd card that sacrificed something to make room for the odd RCA connector. For example rhe awe64 gold (but NOT the lower models of awe64) sacrificed the speaker output to make room to use RCA connectors for the line out. Line in (the subject of this discussion) was still on a 3.5mm stereo jack.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    109. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1

      Thx for taking the time to respond, I could replace with both heavier cord (harder to chew/damage) and larger plug. However I was mostly bitching about the cables themselves and the fact that they are nearly impossible for a do it yourself person to repair. The tiny wires inside make for messy splice jobs, and trying to perform directly soldered cord replacements inside the headphones are a bitch too.

    110. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally XLRs aren't known as Jacks.

    111. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Probably going to get marked redundant, but I couldn't agree more.

      The truth is, though, that I think the original poster answered his question in the post - The last four LAPTOPS he bought. Most laptops I have seen do have only a headphones out jack and a microphone in jack, at least that I have seen.

      Truthfully, dude, are you buying laptops and not even looking to see if the specs meet your needs? You should be laughed at by the Slashdot community.

      Second, buy a freakin Desktop or build one yourself. I have yet to see a motherboard with onboard audio that does not have a line in jack. Or just go buy yourself a soundblaster. In fact, they have USB soundblasters. Notice first feature - record old cassette tapes & vinyl to MP3 with included software.

      So, he doesn't buy laptops without first checking to see if they have what he needs, he is assumming that because his laptop doesn't have said jack, all computers must not have them, and clearly doesn't know how to use Google. That took me 10 seconds of searching.

    112. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That whooshing sound you hear is not actually crosstalk on your speaker wires.

    113. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "Lots of external USB/FireWire audio interfaces have XLR inputs (and sometimes even outputs). If you're doing "serious recording," you'll want to own such a device."

      Actually, with all the lag USB or firewire introduces, no. I'm better off with a dedicated mixer board run to the line-in. Which is what I did.

      Sadly, Windows 7 introduces so much lag (150+ms) that I have an XP partition just for doing recording (with an easily-correctable 10ms latency.)

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    114. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by mirix · · Score: 1

      I don't think an adapter cable counts as "on the laptop", otherwise I could say any computer has RCA's, if you get a $1 RCA - 1/8" TRS adapter.

      Not to mention that TFS is about audio, not TV out. You should have known from the context that I meant RCAs for audio input, on the physical laptop, which I have never seen.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    115. Re:I Don't Know What You're Talking About by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I have and use the old M-Audio Firewire Solo for all of my audio input and I've never had a problem with it, except for the whole pain in the ass "do not hot swap firewire devices" nonsense, which is the fault of the spec and not the device. The drivers are fine, the sound quality is high, and the gear is solid.

      I definitely recommend M-Audio gear. In addition to the FW Solo I have two keyboard controllers and some lowly foot pedals by M-Audio, and they all work flawlessly. Their gear is classified as prosumer solely because they manage to keep costs low enough for mere mortals to purchase it.

  2. Buy a USB headset. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a USB headset that includes a microphone. They usually have an adapter that includes both line-in and line-out.

  3. Why do you need one? by PCM2 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Why do you need two inputs? I highly doubt there's much difference between the line-in jack on your sound card and the stereo microphone jack. If you were hoping a line-in jack would somehow give you better audio quality, I think you'll have to look to more professional gear for that. Try Guitar Center.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Why do you need one? by musicalmicah · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microphone jacks have gain. Gain leads to clipping. And clipping leads to the dark side.

    2. Re:Why do you need one? by spisska · · Score: 2, Informative

      I highly doubt there's much difference between the line-in jack on your sound card and the stereo microphone jack.

      Microphones need power, and the mic-in provides it. Line-level audio is powered by the device producing the signal. If you run a regular mic into a line input, you'll get a much lower signal. Likewise, if you run a line into a mic-in you'll get more signal than the circuit is designed to handle, and it will distort much more easily.

      I haven't seen any evidence of any great conspiracy to eliminate line-in from computer audio -- every sound card I've ever bought has it and I've never paid more than around US$25 (except the M-Audio Delta 1010LT -- 10 line-in, 10-line out, ~$200), but there are plenty of really simple audio USB adapters for $10-$20 retail. I've got a couple that came included with music hardware but I've never used them.

      As for cost, audio gear is a bit like wine -- there's a huge difference between a $2 bottle and a $10 bottle, a bit of difference between a $10 and $25 bottle, and only subtle differences between a $25 and $100 bottle.

      And if you're the audio equivalent of a wine snob that thinks he/she can taste the difference between a $100 and $1,000 bottle, than I'm sure someone is willing to sell you an automagnetic bit-harmonizing inductive-conditioning audio conduit interface for the price of a small car.

    3. Re:Why do you need one? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microphone jacks have gain. Gain leads to clipping. And clipping leads to the dark side.

      Every sound card or motherboard with audio includes an app with the driver that will conform the level to your liking.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:Why do you need one? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      You don't need two inputs. Many modern sound cards (or hardware built onto the motherboard) have hardware to allow ports to be changed between line-in, microphone, line-out, and headphone. There's probably some chip that connects directly to the jack, and this chip internally can change what the jack is used for (input, output, and the level), subject to software control.

    5. Re:Why do you need one? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Funny

      And clipping leads to the dark side.

      Agreed. Hearing an overdriven amp for the first time tends to turn these into this.

    6. Re:Why do you need one? by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Informative

      Microphones need power

      The word you're looking for is "gain", not "power". Some microphones also require power (either of the low-voltage "plug-in power" variety or full 48V phantom power), but if you plug those devices into a line input, you'll get no sound at all.

      As for the differences in grades of gear, yes, to some degree, that's true, with the caveat that some $10/channel hardware will outperform the $100/channel hardware and other $10/channel hardware will be utter excrement. In the audio space, there's often more correlation between price and marketing costs than between price and product quality, IMHO....

      More to the point, the older the gear, the more expensive it has to be before you are likely to get good sound. There are exceptions, but in general, as the costs of the underlying components decrease, it becomes more practical to build higher quality gear for less money. Thus, a recently designed device that costs $50 is likely to sound as good as a ten-year-old device that costs $100. High quality gear gets cheaper to design and build over time. So the high end stuff today might or might not be a great improvement over the midrange stuff today, but either one is going to be a lot better than the midrange stuff from ten years ago, yet both may still be comparable to the high-end gear from ten years ago.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:Why do you need one? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      And if you're the audio equivalent of a wine snob that thinks he/she can taste the difference between a $100 and $1,000 bottle, than I'm sure someone is willing to sell you an automagnetic bit-harmonizing inductive-conditioning audio conduit interface for the price of a small car.

      And, if you are that type, I'll happily sell you wooden cones to set your sound card on, to eliminate jitter, wow,and flutter. I'll also sell you a special marker which you can use to eliminate the dispersement of laser on your CD-Rs. You apply it around the perimeter of the CD and it helps correct errors while writing and reading audio CDs. All for the low, low price of $1,199.99 and will even include a set of premium gold-plated terminator, triple-braided oxygen free line level audio transmission cables, but only if you buy today. ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    8. Re:Why do you need one? by voltaicsca · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you have $10 and a soldering iron, you can build a simple voltage divider network, and use that to attenuate the "line out" from your turntable to levels that are appropriate for your "mic in" port. For example, take a 9k ohm and 1k ohm resistor and go across the common and signal wires on your line out, and take the connection between the 2 resistors as the input to your mic in to get 1/10th the voltage of the "line out". These are almost certanly not the right values for the job, but the principle is the same, and will allow you to eliminate the clipping problem.

    9. Re:Why do you need one? by rwven · · Score: 1

      The thing is, anything "professional" will probably be using something like optical audio inputs into a recording system. Anything not professional will probably be using some sort of cheap mixer or a light snake which goes into the USB port.

      The line in port just isn't needed any more....

      Of course I may stand corrected by the time this thread is over.

    10. Re:Why do you need one? by musicalmicah · · Score: 1

      I'm no electricity-ologist, but wouldn't you get signal quality loss from all that resisting and gaining? It seems like the audio equivalent of having your copy machine make a zoomed-in copy of a zoomed-out copy.

    11. Re:Why do you need one? by dogzdik · · Score: 0

      Turn the output or input levels down.... That also works.... But as some people seem to think, being fucked in the arse by your girlfriend with a plastic dick is not sex., no matter how you look at it.

      --

      .

      Voting up, Voting down - If I really gave a fuck about your approval or not, I'd come and ask you.

    12. Re:Why do you need one? by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 3, Informative

      However the signal to noise ratio will be horrible because of all the unnecessary gain of the Mic amp stage.

    13. Re:Why do you need one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you need two inputs? I highly doubt there's much difference between the line-in jack on your sound card and the stereo microphone jack. If you were hoping a line-in jack would somehow give you better audio quality, I think you'll have to look to more professional gear for that. Try Guitar Center.

      how about if you were using two audio-in sources at the same time?
      Such as, passing through sound from one computer, through your desktop/laptop, and on to an external speaker system. but at the same time, you wish to utilize the mic port for vent?

      I've noticed a lot of the SoundBlaster internal cards, you can't run the Line-In and Mic at the same time.

    14. Re:Why do you need one? by dintech · · Score: 1

      You just have the problem that MIC tends to be mono and LINE IN is generally stereo.

    15. Re:Why do you need one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have $10 and a soldering iron, you can build a simple voltage divider network, and use that to attenuate the "line out" from your turntable to levels that are appropriate for your "mic in" port.
      For example, take a 9k ohm and 1k ohm resistor and go across the common and signal wires on your line out, and take the connection between the 2 resistors as the input to your mic in to get 1/10th the voltage of the "line out". These are almost certanly not the right values for the job, but the principle is the same, and will allow you to eliminate the clipping problem.

      And greatly increase the noise-to-signal ratio.

    16. Re:Why do you need one? by marcansoft · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of optical audio being in use for anything but consumer stuff. Optical audio works, but it's entirely unnecessary.

      Professional gear still depends heavily on line-in style connections (unbalanced linelevel audio), so you won't find that going away any time soon.

    17. Re:Why do you need one? by maharg · · Score: 1

      and the effect is even more intense if the clipping emphasises even order harmonics and is assymetric.

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    18. Re:Why do you need one? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      You would at least get a lower signal-to-noise ratio going over 6-FT of cable, and so you'd have a lower quality even ignoring the electronics.

    19. Re:Why do you need one? by decep · · Score: 1

      Wow, Clippy sounds even more evil now.

    20. Re:Why do you need one? by TransientAlias · · Score: 1

      you can tell the difference, but you would have already have had to spend a bunch of dough on tuning the room and putting in very good speakers, and tuning them to the room... and of course for the very fine detail, you would have had to spend most of your life wearing earplugs. But there is a difference. also not all microphones need power. most use an induction based transducer to create a very small ac voltage (-60ish dB), which is then bumped up by the mic preamp, depending on the device to -10 or +4 dB. Condenser mics need power to charge the plates, tube mics also need power... and there is at least one mic that I know of which has a dynamic element but has active electronics in it to tweak the frequency response and requires phantom power.

    21. Re:Why do you need one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, changing the level in software AFTER the ADCs is not really going to help if you're running the input hot to the point of clipping.

  4. Like a desktop? by delphi125 · · Score: 1

    All motherboards have em.

    1. Re:Like a desktop? by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      I agree, I have a month old Dell desktop that is pretty much completely "legacy free", up to not having an IDE hard drive connector, let alone stuff like PS2 keyboard / mouse or serial ports - but it has a line in for sound (although it seems to be doubled up with an output for 5.1 audio, but I don't have a fancy speaker setup so that isn't a problem).

      Although the few bits of vinyl ripping I've done involved borrowing a handheld digital audio recording thingamajig aimed more at musicians (a Zoom H4), due to the fact that neither desktop PCs or hi-fi setups are that portable.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
  5. Uh no... by Anrego · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More likely, line-in is just not a feature used by enough mobile users to make it worth putting on a laptop.

    Most laptops don't come with 7.1 surround sound output either.. and it's not because surround sound is fading into the sunset..

    Any desktop motherboard with integrated sound will probably have one though.. and just about any add-on sound card will as well.

    _AND_ any decent external sound "card" will probably have one.. have a look at terratec's produce line. The DMX 6Fire USB has a whole plethora of inputs.

    Even cheap mini-itx boards (MSI Wind for instance) have line in.. just get yourself one o` those...

    1. Re:Uh no... by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      The line noise of using a standard, run-of-the-mill audio device to input audio is just ridiculous. If you're really doing something that 'matters' with the line-in, you should consider professional/semi-professional audio equipment anyway, along the lines of probably a USB sound input device.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  6. Mic Preamp Disable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may just be me but I believe my laptop, at least under linux, has a mic preamp boost option. It's POSSIBLE that with that disabled the mic port acts just like a line-in.

    Regardless I don't think I've had a laptop in the past 5+ years that had anything other than headphone out and mic in available on it.

    Regarding sound cards, most of them have reconfigurable audio ports with seperate options for both line in as well as mic in, so it's possible you're just not looking around enough.

    1. Re:Mic Preamp Disable? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      You need to adjust and monitor audio levels while recording; clipping is the audio equivalent of blowing out highlights in photography. You may need to manually turn off the mic preamp ("Microphone Boost" on some sound cards) and then adjust the gain controls.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  7. There Is Hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called an audio pad. Magically takes the -10 dB IHF level of your Technics stereo down to the -45 to -52 dB mic level so you can plug it into your laptop.

    Wait wait wait, it gets better...they're cheap. And you can make them yourself.

    1. Re:There Is Hope! by tylernt · · Score: 1

      It's called an audio pad. Magically takes the -10 dB IHF level of your Technics stereo down to the -45 to -52 dB mic level so you can plug it into your laptop.

      If I'm not mistaken, a 5-cent resistor will do the same thing.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    2. Re:There Is Hope! by owlstead · · Score: 5, Funny

      No-no-no. You need a 50 dollar gold plated monster transistor for it to sound reasonably ok. All my 5 cent transistors are solid gold.

    3. Re:There Is Hope! by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      But the Audio Pad makes your music sound more... mercurial, or whatever the adjective is this week.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    4. Re:There Is Hope! by Nethead · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually three resistors.

      http://www.electronics-tutorials.com/basics/attenuators.htm

      It's called a pi network (because of the schematic shape.)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    5. Re:There Is Hope! by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      You have to put some care into it. A wire-wound resistor will act as a low-pass filter...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    6. Re:There Is Hope! by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      (...but to be fair, a real attenuator pad really is nothing more than a few 5-cent resistors)

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    7. Re:There Is Hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there i was thinking it was a network of pies.... How sadly mistaken I was :(

    8. Re:There Is Hope! by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually two resistors.

      RF stuff is done on the basis of matched impedances (maximum power transfer configuration and also avoids reflection issues). Audio stuff is generally done on the basis of a low impedance source driving a high impedance load (maximum voltage transfer configuration) so to attenuate the signal you ideally want a potential divider with a resistance much greater than the impedance of the source and much less than the impedance of the load (generally not a problem as the two are usually VERY different)

      However having said all this attenuating the signal and feeding it into a laptop mic input is about the worst solution I can think of. Low level audio signals and laptops DO NOT mix well. .

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    9. Re:There Is Hope! by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't consider them unless they have braided leads. ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    10. Re:There Is Hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two resistors, actually. Otherwise, yes.

    11. Re:There Is Hope! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a wire-wound resistor above 500 ohms, so you'd have to be nuts to try that. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    12. Re:There Is Hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The adjective THIS week is "minimythidian."

    13. Re:There Is Hope! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup because its always better to solve the problem of pesky strong signals by weakening them and then amplifying the weakened signal.

      The GP's solution of leaving the stronger signal in place and turning off amplification is a terrible idea!

    14. Re:There Is Hope! by oldbenway · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Monster mouse cable for when you're editing.

    15. Re:There Is Hope! by butlerm · · Score: 1

      All my 5 cent transistors are solid gold.

      Ah yes, but silver is so much better.

    16. Re:There Is Hope! by ewertz · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be caught dead using transistors without Argon in them. They go to 11, but need to be burned-in for 20-40 hours before they sound optimal. Trust me, I used to be a salesman before I found a brain surgeon that installs.

  8. Yes, it's dying by blhack · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The line-in jack will disappear with physical audio. Honestly, unless you're a DJ, it's pretty unlikely that you have any audio that doesn't exist as something digital (MP3, AAC, WAV, etc.)

    And if you are a DJ, you should be using a dedicated piece of hardware... Don't get me wrong, this makes me sad (probably because audio is a hobby of mine) but it isn't at all surprising.

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:Yes, it's dying by phliar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly, unless you're a DJ, it's pretty unlikely that you have any audio that doesn't exist as something digital (MP3, AAC, WAV, etc.)

      Well, you know, there are still a couple of people around that play musical instruments (you know, those expensive things you don't have to plug in), and we sometimes like to record the sounds that we make. And others sometimes go to listen to people playing these instrument things, and they sometimes like to record the sounds. Craziness!

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    2. Re:Yes, it's dying by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The line-in jack will disappear with physical audio. Honestly, unless you're a DJ, it's pretty unlikely that you have any audio that doesn't exist as something digital (MP3, AAC, WAV, etc.)

      Why drop it? Its not as if it is any major cost to the machine these days. I don't use my line-in that often but it is certainly useful and it would be a pain to have to go an get a USB adapter for something so basic.

      I suspect that the models that don't have them are low end computers where the manufacture tries to cut costs in the most extreme ways.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    3. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're playing a musical instrument and want to record it, you should really invest in something better than the total crap built-on soundchips included on most modern PCs. Others have posted links to reasonably priced USB options. The real expense is in the instrument itself, the microphone(s), and a decent room setup. So the GP was too quick to say "DJ", which is one of the last things that comes to mind for me...aren't many of them all digital now?

    4. Re:Yes, it's dying by yelvington · · Score: 5, Funny

      This "musical instrument" cancer MUST BE STOPPED. When unlicensed amateurs are permitted to record anything they want, they devalue the musical landscape for legitimate musicians who are under corporate contracts. Do you want Miley Cyrus to starve, and Lady Gaga to go naked? Major recording studios stand to lose MILLIONS of dollars. We need legislation to control the unlicensed spread of microphones and pickup jacks. Anything capable of capturing sound should be subjected to a 60% surtax, the proceeds of which should be delivered directly to the Harry Fox Agency.

    5. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically, if you wanted to record the sound from an acoustic instrument, you would use a microphone and the mic-in socket.

    6. Re:Yes, it's dying by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

      Considering the number of webpages that seem full of Lady Gaga's latest outrageous outfit, her sexuality and so on, I'd say it's virtually certain that many people out there really *do* want to see Lady Gaga go naked.....

      --
      I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
    7. Re:Yes, it's dying by Tromad · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I just went to a party with a lot of young adults and out of 20 people, me and my brother were the only ones who knew how to play the guitar, and I'm not talking expert level, I'm talking about just playing anything. Maybe those stats are normal, but they seem ridiculously low for an instrument that is so easy to pick up and learn. My evidence is anecdotal but with the continual closing of public music programs, it just seems to me that people just aren't as interested in playing instruments anymore. Or maybe this has always been said and now it is just a product of the times as instruments become virtualized.

    8. Re:Yes, it's dying by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Well, you know, there are still a couple of people around that play musical instruments (you know, those expensive things you don't have to plug in)

      I most certainly do plug in my electric guitar, as does every other electric guitarist on the planet.

    9. Re:Yes, it's dying by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how instrument playing compares to a few decades ago, but centuries ago, only rich people played musical instruments as a hobby. With all the "Guitar Center" stores that have popped up, I think instrument playing is actually quite a bit higher now than it was in the past. It may have fallen a bit since the 50s, however, as it seemed that people back then had a bit more disposable income, and more time and interest in DIY stuff since they didn't have 500 channels of crap to watch.

    10. Re:Yes, it's dying by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      I hear you! For musicians, as much as I hate to say it, Microsoft is a better environment than Linux as the Linux music software is simply not at all easy to use. You got me thinking a bit and I wonder if I plug the earphone jack right into the Yamaha silent brass unit and to the microphone jack on my PC if I can listen to it through my sound system and record it to hard drive as well.
                    I would love to have software that can capture sound in either base or treble clef, convert it to sheet music in the clef of choice and print it out in a full size format. I want to do that with one or two clicks on one program.

    11. Re:Yes, it's dying by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Do you want Miley Cyrus to starve, and Lady Gaga to go naked?

      To that second one, maybe? Will there be pictures of it and can the internet have them will be the answer.

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    12. Re:Yes, it's dying by socsoc · · Score: 1

      woosh...

    13. Re:Yes, it's dying by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up. That's the real reason why the inputs are disappearing from laptops. If you're trying to record something of any quality, the audio hardware built into computers doesn't even begin to cut it. The latency alone will make you want to throw your machine across the room. So:

      • People trying to do any real recording are going to buy a decent outboard interface with decent preamps.
      • People who don't care about quality will likely use the built-in mic on the laptop's bezel.
      • People who want better isolation for things like video chat but aren't very serious about quality can pick up a cheap USB mic or headset.

      Either way, the audio input jack sits there unused.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    14. Re:Yes, it's dying by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ironically, if you wanted to record the sound from an acoustic instrument, you would use a microphone and the mic-in socket.

      Only if you hate your ears and believe they should be punished.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    15. Re:Yes, it's dying by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Not if you want any quality at all. Have you heard the noise levels on those pres? At least the line level inputs are usable (albeit not great) with an external preamplifier, but the mic inputs? They're basically for cheap $5 headsets so that people can use them for A/V chatting....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    16. Re:Yes, it's dying by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Either way, it's still less sick than the ones who want to see Lady Gaga starve and...

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    17. Re:Yes, it's dying by kimvette · · Score: 1

      You would use a condenser mic with a real preamp.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    18. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want Miley Cyrus to starve, and Lady Gaga to go naked?

      Yes, and VERY YES!

    19. Re:Yes, it's dying by Tromad · · Score: 1

      Oh I definitely agree with that premise, to me it just seems like there was a lot of interest in the 50s-70s and it has been slowly tapering off.

    20. Re:Yes, it's dying by ArtemaOne · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you want Miley Cyrus to starve, and Lady Gaga to go naked?

      Yes and yes.

    21. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why drop it? How about cost! I know it sounds cheap, but even if those jacks are only 10 cents, it's a massive profit loss when you are talking about hundreds of thousands of machines. If it's a feature that few people actually use, why not recover that 10 cents if it's not going to impact the total number of machines you sell?

    22. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont bother with windows for music recording. Go to any music store, and they will tell you. Apple all the way.

      I have been doing elctronic music for around 10 years now, and only in the last little while moved to apple.
      The difference is simply amazing.
      When using PC's to do the sequencing/mixing/recording, I estimate that around 1/2 my time was spend doing:
      Bios changes
      working out what happened to the recording latency
      working out why my setup changed since the last reboot

      when using apples, all of my time is spent making music.

      No reboots, no latency issues, no major PC maintenance.

      If you are serious about makeing music, just do yourself a favour, and buy a macbook pro, logic, and a decent firewire soundcard. It is a bit more expensive (mine cost around aud$5000 all up - got a motu 838mk2($1200),logic 9 ($600), and a macbook pro - ($3500))
      Easily the most important addition to my studio, and the addition that I have absolutely no regrets about.

      Forget windows, and definately dont even bother with Linux.
      Just pay the apple tax, and you won't ever want to go back.

    23. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why drop it? How about cost! I know it sounds cheap, but even if those jacks are only 10 cents, it's a massive profit loss when you are talking about hundreds of thousands of machines. If it's a feature that few people actually use, why not recover that 10 cents if it's not going to impact the total number of machines you sell?

      they cost .001 cent when you buy them by the millions

    24. Re:Yes, it's dying by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      Because it is cost, and it is complexity, and every port and part you can drop saves money. Or should we still have parallel ports and serial ports on our computers? How many IDE ports and floppy ports would you consider appropriate? Would you like two ISA slots, or is one enough?

      At some point, you have to remove things that nobody uses. I'm going to wager that, effectively, nobody uses the line-in port - I have seven computers in my apartment and never once, in the last five years, have I used the line-in port.

      I really don't think that $50 for an adapter that you will be able to use right up until USB is obsolete (which is a long, long ways off, if ever) is too high a cost compared to literally thousands of people getting another hunk of plastic and metal that they will never, ever touch.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    25. Re:Yes, it's dying by tirefire · · Score: 1

      Do you want Miley Cyrus to starve, and Lady Gaga to go naked?

      So hard to choose. Can I have both?

    26. Re:Yes, it's dying by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Or should we still have parallel ports and serial ports on our computers?

      Yes. If I'm paying $100 for the motherboard, I can pay $105 for an identical one which has at least one serial and parallel ports.

      Parallel ports are great for connecting various devices to a PC - lights, relays etc. You can't do that with USB without some special chips and special drivers.

      How many IDE ports and floppy ports would you consider appropriate?

      2xIDE, 1xFloppy

      Ok, now the motherboard costs $107, whatever.

      Would you like two ISA slots, or is one enough?

      Instead of ISA slots, how about two PCIe slots and 5 PCI slots, instead of 2xPCIe, 3xPCI and 2x empty space?

      Small PCIe slots (1x and such) do not have advantages over regular PCI 66MHz or even 33MHz slots and most devices do not need the speed anyway (TV capture cards, sound cards, serial/parallel port cards, USB controllers etc).

      The only devices that need more than 133MB/s are gigabit network cards and IDE/SATA/SCSI/SAS controllers and most motherboards come with an integrated gigabit NIC and quite a few SATA ports (AFAIK SATA can also use hubs to connect more than one drive to one port).

      What regular PCI has the advantage in is compatibility. Most of old devices are still good and when I am upgrading, I, for example, do not need to buy a new sound card, because the old one is usually enough, the same with TV input cards and even NICs and hard drive controllers.

    27. Re:Yes, it's dying by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I really see no reason I should have paid an extra $100 over the last few years for ports that I will never, ever use. I mean, what about PS2 keyboard and mouse ports? What about so-called "standard" keyboard ports? I bet you could add SCSI to a modern computer pretty cheaply.

      I mean, basically, your cutoff point is "well I might use it at some point in the future". Apparently a serial port is useful to everyone (it's not) while an ISA port is useless to everyone (it's not). As mentioned, the vast majority of people will use, *at most*, one PCIe slot for a flashy graphics card, an onboard Ethernet port, onboard audio out, and USB. And most people will honestly just rely on the onboard video.

      That's it. That's all you need for a modern computer. Anything more is a waste of money for most users.

      (also I have no idea how you can use modern sound cards, they're all absolute junk and I haven't had one that worked properly for the last five years, my "sound card" is - natch - connected over USB :P)

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    28. Re:Yes, it's dying by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      The best thing is that those examples of yours, IDE, floppy, and ISA are all absolutely outdated and replaced by a different interface, not just dropped altogether. The real equivalent in this scenario would be if they dropped analog line in in favor of a optical line in, but you obviously don't see what happened to IDE, floppy drives, and ISA ports. They were all superseded by newer technologies, not dropped altogether as a concept.

    29. Re:Yes, it's dying by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      I mean, what about PS2 keyboard and mouse ports?

      My 8 port KVM switch is PS/2. I suppose I could use USB, but all of my desktop PCs have PS/2 ports anyway. The DIN5 keyboard port has the same signals as PS/2 port.

      I bet you could add SCSI to a modern computer pretty cheaply.

      PCI SCSI cards are quite cheap, I don't know about PCIe SCSI cards though.

      Apparently a serial port is useful to everyone (it's not) while an ISA port is useless to everyone (it's not).

      Agreed. Actually, now that I think about it, an ISA slot would also be useful, since there are no adaptors to connect the ISA card to a newer slot.

      As mentioned, the vast majority of people will use, *at most*, one PCIe slot for a flashy graphics card, an onboard Ethernet port, onboard audio out, and USB.

      A PCIe x16 slot can also be used for a x1 card, but the reverse is not true. So, 2x PCIe x16 slots. 1 for the video card and another one for a RAID controller, PCIe SSD or another video card.

      And most people will honestly just rely on the onboard video.

      Those people probably will buy a motherboard without PCIe slots or even a mATX board with one or two PCI slots.

      (also I have no idea how you can use modern sound cards, they're all absolute junk and I haven't had one that worked properly for the last five years, my "sound card" is - natch - connected over USB :P)

      I now have Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic. It works almost OK, that is the output is good enough for me, but the combination microphone/line-in jack has a problem, it outputs the +5V in both modes, which makes one channel more noisy, lowers its impedance and can cause problems for other devices. I now use two 2uF coupling capacitors to block the DC and for now can live with the increased noise and mismatched impedances. It is not a big enough problem for me to make me buy a new soundcard (which will have a separate line-in jack and probably will be better, but expensive).

      I have a USB soundcard that I use with my laptop (Creative X-Fi Surround 5.1) and it is OK, except that if I want to play line in to line out it has a lot of latency and consumes ~50% CPU.

    30. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you want Lady Gaga to go naked?"

      Well then at least we'd know if the rumors are true....

    31. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The line-in jack will disappear with physical audio. Honestly, unless you're a DJ, it's pretty unlikely that you have any audio that doesn't exist as something digital (MP3, AAC, WAV, etc.)

      Why drop it? Its not as if it is any major cost to the machine these days. I don't use my line-in that often but it is certainly useful and it would be a pain to have to go an get a USB adapter for something so basic.

      I suspect that the models that don't have them are low end computers where the manufacture tries to cut costs in the most extreme ways.

      Because it costs money for the socket, and to pay someone to wire the socket to the board. Means one less hole in the case, too. It may well persist in desktop machines, where its cost is truly negligible, because it's part of the back-panel of sockets, but on a laptop the cost of providing is more significant, so we'll probably see it vanish. I won't miss it.

    32. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want Lady Gaga to go naked?

      Yes please?

    33. Re:Yes, it's dying by benthurston27 · · Score: 1
    34. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want Miley Cyrus to starve, and Lady Gaga to go naked?

      Yes.

    35. Re:Yes, it's dying by lordlod · · Score: 1

      If you're trying to record something of any quality, the audio hardware built into computers doesn't even begin to cut it. The latency alone will make you want to throw your machine across the room.

      WTF

      Why if you are recording something do you care about latency? Who cares if the computer lags behind you by a few seconds. The submitter wants to rip a record, he's not going to care if the audio being written to the hard disk is two seconds delayed to the position of the needle, he's probably sitting outside having a cup of tea anyway.

      Latency ONLY matters if you are synchronising the signal to something else. For example if you want to use your computer to take the signal apply an effect and output it on top of the original note. Another common example is DJs using records to control sound output, the latency between moving the record and the output changing is important. Even then, the latency in the sound hardware is negligent compared to the software sound stack and the controlling program.

    36. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want Miley Cyrus to starve, and Lady Gaga to go naked?

      Aren't they already doing that voluntarily?

    37. Re:Yes, it's dying by Alsee · · Score: 1

      musical instruments (you know, those expensive things you don't have to plug in)

      Pffft! I plug my harmonica into the wall.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    38. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you want Miley Cyrus to starve, and Lady Gaga to go naked?.

      That would be acceptable, yes.

    39. Re:Yes, it's dying by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      The parent was responding to a post about recording musical instruments.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    40. Re:Yes, it's dying by absterge · · Score: 1

      Won't someone think of the children?! Who will there be to consume consume consume, if they're little fingers are busy making awful sounds of their own?

      And by the way, yes and yes.

      --
      Try my nuts to your fist style!
    41. Re:Yes, it's dying by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Because it costs money for the socket, and to pay someone to wire the socket to the board. Means one less hole in the case, too. It may well persist in desktop machines, where its cost is truly negligible, because it's part of the back-panel of sockets, but on a laptop the cost of providing is more significant, so we'll probably see it vanish. I won't miss it.

      As I said, it is only significant on lower end models. On higher end models where everything is about 'media' and you are already paying $1000+, taking off a 10c solution with no suitable alternative is just asking for annoyed customers. As for using something such as a Bluetooth microphone, a friend of mine who works with professional audio confirms that, it is a poor replacement.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    42. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a musician I will say that I wouldn't use the crappy line in on most laptops/PCs. I use an M-Audio card, it was well under $200 years ago. Performs beautifully, and produces clean crisp audio.

      (Frankly I wouldn't even use the crappy line in to record music off vinyl to listen to on the computer, but thats another story too).

    43. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing sick about wanting to see Miley Cyrus naked, she's 17 now, and that is old enough to legally fuck (at least in parts of the world with sane laws).

    44. Re:Yes, it's dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, if a musical instrument has something like a 200 ohm impedance output, it's likely some sort of preamplifier will be needed before even thinking about plugging it into a soundcard line in or microphone jack.

  9. audiophiles by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's inevitably some noise that creeps in with a line-level jack on your PC. It's not much, but it drives audiophiles to distraction. Moving it to a USB device helps reduce the noise by an order of magnitude or so. That may be one thing driving the change.

    1. Re:audiophiles by fermion · · Score: 1

      I would also say the ADC on most laptops are likely pretty low fidelity. I concur that a good USB device would be best. There players that have a USB output built in. It also seems that my video camera has a audio input, and can transfer directly to the computer.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    2. Re:audiophiles by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      "It drives audiophiles to distraction".

      So where's the downside (:

    3. Re:audiophiles by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      There's inevitably some noise that creeps in with a line-level jack on your PC. It's not much, but it drives audiophiles to distraction. Moving it to a USB device helps reduce the noise by an order of magnitude or so. That may be one thing driving the change.

      Just charge them 10x as much for the same laptop, and they'll be fine.

    4. Re:audiophiles by dotgain · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. You don't say 10x, you must say an order of magnitude, OK?

    5. Re:audiophiles by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      No, this is Slashdot. An order of magnitude is either 2x, 8x, or 16x.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    6. Re:audiophiles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB can actually hurt as much as it helps, especially in the case of ground issues on devices that aren't bus powered. One thing I dig about my macbook pro is that the 1/8" line in jack doubles as a optical line in with the proper cable. Completely electrically isolating the audio source is the only way to go here. My Numark decks have SPDIF out, I've got a cheap SPDIF->Toslink box in between that and the MBP, and it works well for digitizing LP's.

  10. There are other solutions by larwe · · Score: 1

    What about a USB recording device? They [potentially] have less noise, and they're pluggable anywhere.

  11. It is being replaced with the more futureproof... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Polar-Bear-In jack.

  12. Get a Mac by repetty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you took your investments in "all of the four laptops I've bought" (4) you could have bought a MacBook that has a line-in.

    I'm just saying.

    Also, your laptops seem to have a useful lifespan of just 2.5 years. Sumthin' wrong there, too.

    My 10-year old PowerBook with line-in is still in use.

    What have you been buying???

    1. Re:Get a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, I have a MacBook and it doesn't have a Line-In. Only a microphone port and a speaker jack.

    2. Re:Get a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, your comment is the odd one. My MacBook Pro has a line in; not a microphone level input. According to http://www.apple.com/macbook/specs.html, the MacBook also has a line-level audio input.

    3. Re:Get a Mac by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      Macbooks do not have longer lifespans than other notebooks.

  13. Not sure what you're looking at... by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 2, Informative

    My latest three desktops have all come with a line-in, as have my latest two notebooks, including a netbook. Only my wife's MacBook doesn't have Line In, of my most recently purchased hardware.

    Also, there's the Griffin iMic, a quite cheap device with line in. (Switchable between mic-level and line-level in, even.)

    --
    Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
    The purpose of that site was not known.
    1. Re:Not sure what you're looking at... by Quarters · · Score: 2, Informative
      Macbooks ship with a line in jack. Macbook Pros use the same 1/8" jack for either input or output. You just have to go to the Audio preferences and set it for the mode you need at that time.

      It's much the same on any modern motherboard. The line out jack is also a line in jack. You just need to configure it as such.

    2. Re:Not sure what you're looking at... by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

      To second this, I can't recommend the iMic enough. It's fairly cheap, tiny, and just beautiful in aesthetics *and* function. I use mine to "USB enable" Protracker on my Amiga. I can't see how any USB offerings would be worse compared to whatever gets built into the majority of laptops.

      --
      Do you see what I did there?
    3. Re:Not sure what you're looking at... by unclepedro · · Score: 1

      Hear, Hear. No pun intended. The iMic is the way to go if your machine doesn't have a line-in. Also works out of the box with Linux.

    4. Re:Not sure what you're looking at... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah - I hadn't realized that the port was a combo in/out! I knew it was switchable analog/digital out, I just hadn't realized it was three-way switchable to also be analog in.

    5. Re:Not sure what you're looking at... by Xyde · · Score: 1

      It also accepts remote control signals from iPhone (or compatible) headsets. I'd love to see the wiring diagram for that particular jack :)

    6. Re:Not sure what you're looking at... by jurgemaister · · Score: 1

      I third this. iMic is a great product :-) I guess the use for a line in jack has become so rare that the computer manufacturers don't bother spending money on it anymore.

    7. Re:Not sure what you're looking at... by emm-tee · · Score: 1

      Macbooks ship with a line in jack. Macbook Pros use the same 1/8" jack for either input or output. You just have to go to the Audio preferences and set it for the mode you need at that time.

      Apparently the audio in/out ports are also combined on the MacBook now.

      From http://www.apple.com/macbook/specs.html:

      Combined optical digital output/headphone out (user-selectable analogue audio line in)

      The line-in functionality could be easily missed though, as the symbol next to the socket is just the headphones symbol.

      It's not much of a problem for video/audio calls (e.g. Skype) as there's a microphone, video camera and speakers built in to the MacBook, and they work very well.

      I just hope they never remove the optical out, as I use that all the time to connect to my amp, in preference to the analogue line-out.

  14. Get a USB line in adapter by Phat_Tony · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, a lot of new laptops have neither a microphone nor line-level audio input jack. Most people will never use it.

    One easy solution is just to get a USB line in adapter for around $40, rather than having to keep an entire dinosaur computer around for just one function.

    I don't know how well it works, but here's a $10 adapter on Ebay that does video too. There are other similar products around.

    --
    Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    1. Re:Get a USB line in adapter by thecountryofmike · · Score: 1

      +1 parent please.

  15. If true, its because nobody cares by Gothmolly · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Other than a few Slashdot readers and luddites, few modern PC purchasers need a line-in jack. iTunes and Amazon won, for $9.99 you can get a perfect MP3 rip of my old vinyl, without spending 1+ hours per album ripping then tweaking, then exporting.

    It went out with a whimper.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:If true, its because nobody cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LHC is in Europe.

  16. Professional audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are hundreds of professional audio cards available - either internal or USB - that can record. Even the cheapest ones will do a much better job than the integrated sound card on your computer. Any normal music store will have a large selection to choose from.

  17. How am I going to... by willwinter · · Score: 2, Funny

    load the cassette tapes into my Apple ][+ if you take away my line-in port?

  18. All my ASUS motherboards have them... by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    And so do all my pci soundcards. Maybe you're just buying crappy hardware?

  19. Difference between desktops & laptops by White+Flame · · Score: 1

    All the new desktops still have line-in jacks, as far as I've seen. If you're specifically looking at a portable platform intended to reduce size & weight, then of course they're going to be dropping jacks that are rarely used in a portable situation. However, line-in is still all over the place, and is great for consolidating media devices into 1 nice display & audio setup based around a non-portable computer, as well as the platform shifting purposes you're describing. I don't think the jack is going anywhere in the reasonable future.

  20. Not a conspiracy by markdavis · · Score: 2, Informative

    It might be less of a conspiracy and more of a supply-and-demand thing. Most people have no use for and could care less about line in (I am not one of them, however). Since you are talking about laptops, anything that reduces space is often omitted, if it isn't really needed.

    On desktop machines, I have not seen line-in disappear at all. And I bought a laptop last year, and it has mic/line-in, too.

    1. Re:Not a conspiracy by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      But conspiracy theories easy the pain!

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  21. line-in? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    I still am unsure of the difference between line-in and microphone-in, other than audio level (sensitivity).

    1. Re:line-in? by NNKK · · Score: 1

      It's not sensitivity, it's power.

      When you plug an already suitably-powered audio device (pretty much anything that has an independent power source) into an inevitably-amplified microphone jack, what you get is going to be badly clipped audio (assuming you don't just blow out the sound card). Even if you manage to get the power so low on the input device that you avoid clipping while still having a usable signal, running through the second amplifier is still going to add unnecessary noise/distortion.

    2. Re:line-in? by Deorus · · Score: 1

      My motherboard's microphone connector has a DB boost setting for the microphone, and I recall my Sound Blaster 16 (first generation) having that too. These days you can pretty much set everything up using software since the hardware is a lot more dynamic than it used to be. For example, when I plug something into my desktop's front mic connector it always asks me what kind of device I've just plugged in and adjusts itself accordingly.

    3. Re:line-in? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      An output has a power measurement. An input has a sensitivity measurement. The term "power" has no meaning in the context of an input unless you're talking about the DC phantom power voltage that some mic inputs provide.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:line-in? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Not quite correct: 0dBm is defined as 1mW into a 600 Ohm load, and this has long been a standard where transformer balanced gear is used. For unbalanced equipment with unpredictable input and output impedances, dbV (1.2V) or dBu (0.775V) are used instead.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    5. Re:line-in? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Three characteristics matter, actually: phantom power, impedance (Z) and sensitivity.

      Most PC mics are electret (condensor) types, which typically require a low power DC supply to operate. Fine for a mic, but when you try to connect a line in the DC offset is superimposed on the signal, which can cause half-wave clipping if the output of the device feeding it isn't properly isolated. Most line outputs are DC isolated with capacitors, so this generally isn't a problem, but you can never be sure.

      However, the problem with using capacitors to block DC is that they create a filter. If the source impedance doesn't match the load (such as when you plug a high-Z line out into a low-Z mic in), this filter will be audible.

      Mic inputs tend to have 20-40dB more gain than line level inputs, and this is indeed referred to as sensitivity (no, it isn't power; see my other comment in the thread).

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    6. Re:line-in? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, but we're talking about modern digital gear here. Also, I would argue that specifying the input levels as power into a given load is really just specifying sensitivity by a different name; at 600 ohms of input impedance, 1 dBm = 1 dBu, IIRC.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    7. Re:line-in? by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      At least in the context of ADC, sensitivity seems like the right term. Mic and line-in ports both map analog voltage levels to digital sample values, and the difference between the two is their sensitivity to the input voltage. Mic ports are more sensitive, i.e. will register higher sample values for a given input voltage, and will register a greater change in sample value for a given change in input voltage.

    8. Re:line-in? by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Sensitivity is to power what speed is to velocity: similar, but not the same.

      Input sensitivity, or RMS input voltage for full scale output, is useful when the circuit gain is fixed (or has some calibrated nominal value). So yes, for most consumer gear with standard input types (including standard sound cards and hi-fi phonogram or tape deck inputs) sensitivity is correct enough to get the job done.

      For mixing desks and associated equipment input sensitivity is an indeterminate variable, so an alternative reference is required, and that is best expressed in relation to power into a given load since it allows easy mapping of gain structures in a signal chain*. Impedance matching transformers may seem archaic, but they're still quite common in high end gear, and as the 600 Ohm balanced line is a long established standard 0dBm and 0dBu are the same to allow compatibility with solid state I/O (which for most practical purposes can be said to be immune to loading effects).

      *Decibels are a measure of power rather than amplitude; it's technically incorrect to measure voltage-derived scales in dB, but it means you can add and subtract rather than use long multiplication and division, so only electronic engineers who want to share the misery give a toss.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  22. Just bought a brand spanking new Dell Studio 15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it came with a separate line-in jack along with mic and headphone out, and thats with the standard audio option

  23. Go to Aldi by grege1 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    From one Australian to another. Aldi Supermarkets have a USB Turntable on special this week for $A79 - no line in required - complete with Windows software for recording. Simple, neat and good enough for making mp3s from your old vinyl. Cassettes are a different story, but I am sure there are plenty of options in that area too.

    1. Re:Go to Aldi by grege1 · · Score: 1

      To whoever marked my post off topic Suggesting a USB turntable is not off topic, and a dozen others have suggested the same thing. The final line of his post reads "or are there better thinking-outside-the-box alternatives available?" Yes there are and one is a USB Turntable, and as he is clearly an Australian so I also pointed him to where he can get one easily.

  24. try buying a desktop by cenobyte40k · · Score: 1

    All the desktop machines I have have them, including the ultra-cheap large buyer business workstation that I have floating around. Desktop might take up a little more room, but they are more efficient and cost less.

  25. Quick question by wikid_one · · Score: 1

    This may be a stupid question, but what is the difference between the line-in and the microphone ports? Aren't they both used to receive data from an outside source?

    1. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So is the IR port and the keyboard . . .
      Doesn't mean they're the same.

    2. Re:Quick question by Archon-X · · Score: 1

      Depends on the card, really, but in a perfect world, line-in is 75ohm/150mv and mic.is 600ohm/2.5mv.

      More information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phantom_power

    3. Re:Quick question by SharpFang · · Score: 1, Informative

      Microphone port pumps some current into whatever is connected to it (to power the microphone up)
      Line In doesn't provide any power, it only analyses incoming signal from external source, and will be often separated through transoptors or the like to protect the hardware from overcurrent from difference of potential between the devices.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    4. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transoptors on an audio input will produce very poor linearity (10 bits at best). You can of course have a whole isolated digitizer (driver + A/D converter), so that you isolate a digital bitstream and that's easy. But then you also need isolated power, and that adds cost, unless you could do with whatever single-chip isolators (say from ADI) provide -- usually it's tens of mW, whether it's enough to power an 18 bit audio ADC with a driver -- I dunno.

    5. Re:Quick question by appleguru · · Score: 4, Informative

      Microphone port pumps some current into whatever is connected to it (to power the microphone up)
      Line In doesn't provide any power, it only analyses incoming signal from external source, and will be often separated through transoptors or the like to protect the hardware from overcurrent from difference of potential between the devices.

      Not sure why this was modded +5 informative; it's a load of hooey...

      Normal dynamic microphones are passive and do not require any external power to "power the microphone up". They generate a small current, usually from a coil moving inside a magnet. This is why you need a pre-amp of some kind to bring your mic-level signal up to a line-level signal that a regular amp can deal with. Your sound card has this built in.

      If you have a condensor microphone, then it will need external power of some kind to function. This usually comes in the form of phantom power (+48V usually) over a balanced twisted pair microphone wire. I can promise you that your average soundcard (and pretty much anything with 1/8" jacks) does *not* supply phantom power. You need an external power supply of some kind to use a condensor mic with your soundcard.

      The only real difference between a line in and a mic in on your soundcard is the expected input gain. A mic input has a pre-amp and expects a mic level input. If you feed it a line level input and it doesn't attenuate it (or bypass the preamp) then you'll clip the hell out of the signal.

    6. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they do supply phantom power, the pink socket has always featured 3 pins for providing this. Line-in however uses the 3 pins instead for stereo, hence why both are completely different, and not just a gained version of each other. Newer soundcards have internal ports that can be mapped to external sockets dynamically.

      http://www.epanorama.net/circuits/microphone_powering.html

    7. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm... wrong answer... Most computer MIC inputs are delivering a few Volts for powering a condensor microphone (the most common type used in headsets and desk microphones because they are small, cheap and sensitive) Most MIC inputs are therefore MONO even though the jack looks like a stereo line-input, the third connection is the power supply. The voltage and current needed for a condensor microphone is very low: between 1 and 5 Volt at a few milliamps)

      By the way, my trusty ol' Fujitsu Siemens B Series Lifebook has only microphone and headphone connections so it is not a thing of the modern age.

    8. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still wrong, see sibling posts.

    9. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ.

      A typical PC soundcard microphone port provides a small amount of power on the 'ring' connector. This is used by the preamplifier of an electret microphone.

    10. Re:Quick question by mkbosmans · · Score: 1

      Microphone port pumps some current into whatever is connected to it (to power the microphone up) Line In doesn't provide any power, it only analyses incoming signal from external source, and will be often separated through transoptors or the like to protect the hardware from overcurrent from difference of potential between the devices.

      Not sure why this was modded +5 informative; it's a load of hooey...

      Not sure why this was modded +5 informative; it's a load of hooey...

      Normal dynamic microphones are passive and do not require any external power to "power the microphone up". They generate a small current, usually from a coil moving inside a magnet. This is why you need a pre-amp of some kind to bring your mic-level signal up to a line-level signal that a regular amp can deal with. Your sound card has this built in.

      If you have a condensor microphone, then it will need external power of some kind to function. This usually comes in the form of phantom power (+48V usually) over a balanced twisted pair microphone wire. I can promise you that your average soundcard (and pretty much anything with 1/8" jacks) does *not* supply phantom power. You need an external power supply of some kind to use a condensor mic with your soundcard.

      So yeah, you accurately described how a professional setup works. It just doesn't apply to the situation we're talking about here.

      The mic input on a soundcard does have a voltage (usually +5V) applied to the ring of the input. The microphones typically used with a computer are neither of the condenser nor dynamic type, but are electret microphones.

    11. Re:Quick question by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      The mic input on a soundcard does have a voltage (usually +5V) applied to the ring of the input. The microphones typically used with a computer are neither of the condenser nor dynamic type, but are electret microphones.

      Not sure why this was modded +5 informative; it's a load of hooey...

      Electret microphones don't require power, condenser mics do. But it's not like a condenser absolutely needs 48 volts to physically work. The small and cheap units used with computers work just fine with 5 volts.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    12. Re:Quick question by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Not sure why this was modded +5 informative; it's a load of hooey...

      Actually, it seems that most cheap computer mics are electrets with a preamp. So even though electret as such does not need a polarizing voltage, these units do. Makes me wonder if all these cheap "condenser" capsules I have bought for various projects are actually electrets with a preamp..

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    13. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's the third kind of microphone. The type that happens to be used in cheap headsets for instance. They're called electret microphones and need something upwards of 1.5 volts fed through a resistor of 2k or there about. Most soundcards provide this. In the case of my laptop line-in also doubles as mic-in. Left channel puts out a voltage. it's 2.05 volts and current out is 1.055mA. Yes I've measured, I'm a nerd. Making input impedance 1k94 which is a bit low for quite a few line sources. Right channel is 10k impedance. Line-level sensitivity is 1 volt and microphone sensitivity is a bit less than one mV. Maximum amplification is 45dB.

      Obviously other soundcards may differ somewhat.

    14. Re:Quick question by makomk · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure most electret microphones have an integrated preamp, more specifically a FET. Some of them actually contain a battery in order to provide power for it.

    15. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumer grade soundcard microphone inputs provide phantom power, as the microphone type is usually an electret. The electret microphone capsule contains a piezo-electric element, which behaves somewhat like a condenser microphone, except that it does not require DC bias. The output impedance of the piezo-electric element is capacitive, and must be fed into a very high input impedance (many megohms) to get a reasonable bass response. It is not practical to feed this kind of signal over a cable, due to signal loss and interference problems. The electret capsule contains an FET buffer/amplifier, with a very high input impedance, and a moderate output impedance (say a few hundred to a few thousand ohms). Phantom power of a few volts is required to power the FET.

      As far as I know, soundcard microphone inputs typically provide 1.5V phantom power, with a 1k resistor acting as the drain load for the electret FET. If I recall, the sensitivity is some tens of millivolts. I am not sure what would happen if you plugged in a dynamic (moving coil) microphone. If it was a high impedance microphone (50k nominal), the 1k drain load would kill the signal and frequency response. If it was a low impedance microphone (600 ohms nominal), the signal level would be too low. I think some sound cards have some kind of auto-detect, which only applies the phantom power and drain load if the microphone looks like an FET drain. This would allow correct operation with a high impedance dynamic microphone, which has the right output level.

    16. Re:Quick question by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      Actually, no it is not hooey. Most PC soundcard mic jacks use a standard TRS (three contact) jack with +5V on the ring contact to power the preamp in the mic. This is a completely different thing from +48V phantom power.

      Link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRS_connector#Computer_sound

  26. Get a USB device by steveha · · Score: 1

    There are lots of USB devices out there with a line-in jack.

    Here's one I like a lot. Unfortunately, Turtle Beach has discontinued this product; fortunately, there are some still out there, so buy one now before it's too late.

    http://www.turtlebeach.com/products/audio-advantage-srm/home.aspx

    P.S. This is discontinued... does anyone know where I can find anything remotely similar that is not discontinued?

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Get a USB device by Straterra · · Score: 1

      I own the SRM and its a GREAT sound card. I have the AK-R8, which came with the SRM. These products have only recently went discontinued, so it should be easy to find..I wish you luck!

  27. It's not a conspiracy by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    A line-input jack takes up one of the most valuable resources on a laptop - space. Laptops are also electrically noisy because they are designed to be small and energy efficient, not electrically quiet. A laptop is not meant to be a good recording device.

    Almost every PC sold has at least one Line-input jack. My PC has a line input jack and a coaxial digital S/PDIF input on the motherboard. You can buy USB devices all day long that have up to 24 input channels. I have a pair of 10-channel boards, each having 8 unbalanced analog, 2 XLR, and 1 more coaxial S/PDIF port.

  28. Mic != line by name_already_taken · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why do you need two inputs? I highly doubt there's much difference between the line-in jack on your sound card and the stereo microphone jack.

    A microphone input is expecting microphone-level signals - not line level. There's a big difference, and without something similar to a DI box to correct the level, all you'll get if you put line level audio into a microphone jack is distorted overdriven noise.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:Mic != line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not all microphone ports are created equal. Some, like the one on the first generation Eee PC, have the ability to automatically switch between line-in and microphone depending on what's plugged into it. YMMV depending on how your audio board is wired.

      "The pink microphone port doubles as a stereo line-in socket, depending on what is plugged in to it)."
      http://wiki.eeeuser.com/eee_pc_701

    2. Re:Mic != line by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, a DI boxes are for driving balanced lines, and while this may be a rash generalisation, I don't think any computers have XLR inputs on the built-in sound card. Besides, not all DI boxes have an attenuator (pad), which is what's needed here.

      Assuming there isn't a system setting that allows gain switching on the input (quite possible), simpler and probably cheaper would be a basic interface like the Behringer UCA200.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    3. Re:Mic != line by ffflala · · Score: 1

      While the mic-level/line-level difference is notable, you can decrease the gain on the mic-input enough to to adjust for this difference. (It helps if your sending device has an output level control.)

      A more difficult problem is that the pink mic-in jacks are, afaik, uniformly mono inputs. Depending on the plug you use, substituting the mic-in for a line-in it will either come out as only the left or right stereo track, or an ugly mono blend of both.

      The blue line-in jacks are stereo inputs.

    4. Re:Mic != line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice, but an expense only necessary in a device like the eeepc. Almost every sounnd card with more than $1 comes with a line-in AND a microphone port so you can karaoke awesomeness.

    5. Re:Mic != line by willoughby · · Score: 1

      Radio Shack used to sell an attenuator cable for such applications, I don't know if they still do. In OZ, I suppose one would check at a Dick Smith shop (are they still around?).

    6. Re:Mic != line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incidentally, a DI serves two purposes:

      Reducing the line level signal to a microphone level signal via a transformer

      and

      Converting an unbalanced input to a balanced one.

      If you're just going from unbalanced line level to unbalanced mic level, all you need to build is a -20db pad.

    7. Re:Mic != line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish my sound card came with more than $1.

    8. Re:Mic != line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that is why he said something like a DI box. The idea is the conversion from line level to mic level, not the unbalanced to balanced conversion. But by using a voltage 1:1 balun on the output of a DI box, you should in theory be able to get the desired unbalanced line level signal you need.

      However for computer use something else would probably be better. Unlike with pro audio, in consumer audio you want to deal with both channels in every device, requiring either 2 DI boxes, or one box with dual channel support. The costs for that would be absurd. Considering the quality of standard computer audio components, you could probably get away with using a dual op-amp chip and a could of resistors to design a simple amplifier with a gain of less than one.

    9. Re:Mic != line by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      I suspect that is why he said something like a DI box.

      All dogs have four legs, and my cat has four legs, but that doesn't mean my cat is a dog. An attenuator that doesn't convert from unbalanced to balanced is nothing like a DI box, it's just an attenuator.

      The idea is the conversion from line level to mic level, not the unbalanced to balanced conversion.

      Yes, that's what I said, and that's why a DI box is the wrong choice.

      But by using a voltage 1:1 balun on the output of a DI box, you should in theory be able to get the desired unbalanced line level signal you need.

      A balun is unnecessary, since the output impedance of a DI is lower than the impedance of an electret mic input; depending on whether it's active or passive DI, you could either connect pin 2 instead of pin 3 to input ground, or just leave pin 2 unconnected (shunting to ground through a 10k resistor would be better). Either way, it's still more trouble than just using the right device (an attenuator) in the first place.

      Unlike with pro audio, in consumer audio you want to deal with both channels in every device, requiring either 2 DI boxes, or one box with dual channel support. The costs for that would be absurd.

      A stereo Behringer DI-120 is about Au$40 (and it has switchable 0/20/40dB attenuation). But it's still not the right tool for the job.

      Considering the quality of standard computer audio components, you could probably get away with using a dual op-amp chip and a could of resistors to design a simple amplifier with a gain of less than one.

      It could be done with a simple two resistor voltage divider and DC blocking capacitor per channel for less than a dollar. An op-amp based circuit is unnecessarily complex, won't sound any better, and with a PSU it'd cost about as much as the basic USB interface I mentioned.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  29. If only it did work that way by name_already_taken · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's POSSIBLE that with that disabled the mic port acts just like a line-in.

    It doesn't. Trust me. I was handed 12 hours of video with overdriven audio that can't be corrected (there's no good correction for clipped audio), all recorded that way because someone set up the recorder with line level audio going into the mic jack and never checked the recorded levels.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:If only it did work that way by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      No one is arguing about whether you'll get distortion if you feed a line level signal into a mic level input, fail to check your levels, and don't enable AGC. The same is likely true for a mic input cranked all the way open.

      That said, given that some microphones can exceed line level output by themselves without a preamp (the maximum output of a CAD M9, for example, is +8dBV), it should be possible if you set things up correctly to feed a line level signal into any decent mic input. In some pro gear, they don't even bother to take the preamp out of the signal path for line level inputs; the preamps have to be able to handle that level of input anyway.

      That said, I'm talking about relatively high end gear set up by somebody who is paying attention. When you deal with low end gear that has no padding or trim on the input side of the preamp, no gain adjust on the preamp, and limited headroom in the preamp, you almost certainly have to turn down the output of the device providing the line level signal. Even then, it can be done, though. You just have to do it right.

      So yes, the line level input is gradually going away, and for precisely the reason stated.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:If only it did work that way by cybin · · Score: 1

      If you want to experiment, i've had a lot of success fixing clipped recordings with iZotope RX, which includes not only the de-clipper, but a de-clicker and some pretty awesome noise reduction... i believe it works through vector analysis but i'm not sure.

      (just a satisfied user, btw!)

    3. Re:If only it did work that way by danlip · · Score: 1

      there's no good correction for clipped audio

      Have you tried iZotope RX. I haven't actually tried the declipper, but the denoiser is practically magic and the hum removal is pretty sophisticated too. I suppose it depends on how badly it's clipped. (and, yes, mic level is not the same as line-in and you really don't want to mix them up in either direction)

    4. Re:If only it did work that way by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I was handed 12 hours of video with overdriven audio that can't be corrected (there's no good correction for clipped audio)

      Yes, there is a good correction. The first step is properly scaling the video to match the audio. A 10x contrast adjustment should be about right.

      Then you sit down the person who gave it to you, tie them in the chair in a dark room, and make them watch the 12 hours of audio and video.

      Problem corrected.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    5. Re:If only it did work that way by ^_^x · · Score: 1

      While that's a rational and logical conclusion, I'm finding that in SOME cases, the mic-in is also line-in. On many contemporary Dells I've seen, you can run a line output, even at a fairly loud level, into the front panel mic-in, or the only mic-in on a laptop, and it sounds clear and not overmodulated at all. I was hesitant to do it at first, but now I regularly plug my iPod into my work PC at a level a few times what I'd use for headphones, and the PC takes it just fine. I even enabled mic boost in Windows to no ill effect. So I think the included line inputs aren't neccessarily dying out, just mutating.

      (Though for any kind of serious use, I find all integrated sound cards and many aftermarket ones are just crap... so much noise.)

  30. No shit by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously, anyone who can't find analogue sound input for their computer hasn't bothered looking very hard. I can find it for you USB, Firewire, PCI, or PCIe. Stereo, 8 channel, 128 channel, whatever you like. You name the kind of audio capture you need, someone out there makes a product for it. All of them will be better quality than the line-in jack on a laptop, which generally has really poor filtering and thus lots of noise.

    The parent is absolutely right in terms of the Behringer as a good, cheap solution. Need something better? You can get something like the M-Audio MobilePre (http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/MobilePreUSB.html) which has pretty good converters and some features you don't need. Still not enough, have to have no holds barred? Get yourself an Benchmark ADC1 (http://www.benchmarkmedia.com/adc1/) converter, which is just about as good as it get.

    No matter what the level, from a highly adequate $35 USB audio interface, up to a $1,700 dedicated converter, you can get something that'll meet your needs, and do so online.

    The only reason line in is dying on soundcards is people aren't using it much. On laptops, space is also a premium so why bother? Many desktop cards still have it, as they've got the space for more inputs.

    1. Re:No shit by spisska · · Score: 4, Informative

      The parent is absolutely right in terms of the Behringer as a good, cheap solution.

      Beware of Behringer gear. Yes, it is cheap. Yes, it is decent when it works. But the build quality is quite shoddy. It will do the job, but something will break or burn out fairly quickly. I was warned about this before I bought a mixer from them, but I figured that it would be in a fairly decently controlled location and not moved around. Barely two years later and it's already blown one channel strip and the headphone-out.

    2. Re:No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was shopping for a keyboard amp in the 180-300W range - every dealer I spoke with steered me toward the Behringers. I already have a 15w behringer kt-108 amp (for a tiny amp in that price range I wasn't too concerned about sound quality or reliability; just its compact size) but was looking for something with both better, clearer highs and lows. The recommendation surprised me since it's half the price of other brands. I've visited about 5 shops and spoke with reps from three online and they consistently recommend the Behringers - either the keyboard (K3000FX) or the bass amp (BXL3000). I can say I'm impressed with how the Roland's amps sound (I own some Roland gear such as midi/synth modules, effects pedals, etc. but no amps) but that dealers are recommending the Behringer gear over other more pricey, higher-margin gear is surprising.

      At the price, I don't trust Behringer for higher end products. Also, I've read several reviews that state while they might sound better than the Rolands, they do not output their rated power - they are probably rated for "peak" power which is meaningless, rather than continuous/RMS power. In other words, they lie.

    3. Re:No shit by spisska · · Score: 1

      The warning about Behringer gear isn't that it doesn't produce good sound. It does, especially for the price.

      It's that Behringer gear will flake out on you. And most likely at the worst possible time.

      Maybe the quality has changed, but I'd be a bit put off by the fact that all the sales reps are pushing this gear. It's also an assumption that an equivalent Roland rig (for example) is higher margin just because it's more expensive.

      I know a guy who's been using (for guitar) the same Roland JC 120 for 20 years. Behringer's not been around that long, but I don't know anyone who'll claim a Behringer rig will be working five years from now, let alone 20.

      Music gear is a funny business. Companies have to bring new products to market all the time, but it's the standards that keep them going.

      Shure has new mics every year, but their best sellers are still the SM57 and SM58. Those pieces are still the same as they were 20, 30, 40 years ago. And the Les Paul?

      Maybe the quality has improved, and maybe I'm just too much of a natural skeptic. But if I were a salesman, I'd push a Behringer amp over a Roland just because I know I'd be seeing you again a whole lot sooner.

    4. Re:No shit by kklein · · Score: 1

      N=1, but I've had a Behringer 8-channel as my home recording mixer for 10 years now, and it's been a total champ. I've been amazed at what a great deal it is.

    5. Re:No shit by idlemachine · · Score: 1

      And the plural of anecdote...

      My partner & I between us own a fair amount of Behringer equipment, primarily mixers, monitors and midi devices. In the 7-8 years of using them I've yet to have any fail.

      One incident of failure is hardly reason to publicly vilify a company, but then again, this _is_ /.

    6. Re:No shit by fan+of+lem · · Score: 1

      not true in my case. i've owned a behringer mixer (eurorack) for some four years and did not have any issues with it whatsoever.

    7. Re:No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iv had 2 identical behringer products burn out on me in 18 months dont touch there crud. peace.

    8. Re:No shit by grapeape · · Score: 1

      I've had a Behringer Ultrabass amp for about 5 years now, no problems at all other than the strap came loose (its a bit heavy to lug around very far by just the handle on top). In fact I've even had it drop out of a truckbed onto the ground with no problems afterwards. I also have a vamp that has worked great since I bought it secondhand years ago. On the other hand I have had a small mixer from them that crapped out in less than year but it was under warranty so it was replaced. The company I have actually had the worst luck with has been Line 6, I havent had anything from them last very long at all, after going through 2 amps and a rackmount processor I just gave up on them.

    9. Re:No shit by clifyt · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've met several folks from Behringer over the years, and talked with them about their manufacturing processes and otherwise. It is amazing the stories you hear from people in competition to them, only to work for them later...if the truth was there in the first place, why did they go to the company?

      The fact is, most of the complaints are unfounded...they automated the process that most companies had to have hired skilled workers to assemble and match. This pisses off a LOT of people in the audio world that assume that because the way it was always done should be the way it is done in the future. In fact, their process makes the QA a little better. Will products still break? Sure...but far less that anything else similarly priced. Equal to that much higher.

      I know of a few companies that have investigated their processes to automate their lines the same way...the tide is turning toward how Behringer does things...but you still get the reputation based on an industry of complaints. (BTW, my Tascam digital mixer did the same thing...had it repaired and its now doing the same thing...luckily, I have a new alesis interface so I don't have to worry bout it right now...even if it means I have a few less channels right now)...

    10. Re:No shit by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Right: don't assume a conspiracy, when there's a simpler Darwinian explanation: Hardly anyone actually uses line-in jacks, so hardware manufacturers increasingly don't bother spending money to include them.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    11. Re:No shit by OrangeCatholic · · Score: 1

      >The warning about Behringer gear isn't that it doesn't produce good sound. It does, especially for the price.

      Depends if it's difficult. I have a small Behringer mixer that I wrote off as "too noisy" but it turns out it's fine. As long as you use the 1/4" jacks and don't use the mic pre-amps (XLR).

      It turns out you don't get quality mic pre-amps for $50. Somehow I'm not surprised by that.

      Behringer is barely-pro audio, more like consumer gear repackaged and upsold. You're taking a risk.

    12. Re:No shit by danlip · · Score: 1

      Beware of Behringer gear. Yes, it is cheap. Yes, it is decent when it works. But the build quality is quite shoddy. It will do the job, but something will break or burn out fairly quickly. I was warned about this before I bought a mixer from them, but I figured that it would be in a fairly decently controlled location and not moved around. Barely two years later and it's already blown one channel strip and the headphone-out.

      I refer to Behringer as "the best of the cheap shit". We use tons of it for my meditation center (we also produce meditation music and spiritual talks and do live streaming of meditations and other events, so we have mixers, USB converters, expanders/gates, etc). I haven't had bad failure rates. The quality clearly isn't as good as top pro brands, but if you need a pro audio setup on a budget it is the way to go.

    13. Re:No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To a lesser extent, I would say the same thing about any M-Audio gear that touches either actual sound (analog or digital) or FireWire ports. I saw some rumors online that some of the M-Audio FireWire interfaces weren't hot swappable, and thus couldn't be connected and disconnected without rebooting the computer, lest you want to chance blowing out the FireWire port on your computer. Yikes!

      If you're looking for a semi-professional system that actually sounds quite good, almost anything by PreSonus is going to work pretty well. There are yet more expensive options out there, but PreSonus gear offers a lot of bang for the buck and works quite well without any dumb issues. I did a LOT of research before I ended up buying one of their interfaces.

    14. Re:No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I played bass professionally for a long enough time and can say the same thing about any gear. Every big brand bass rig I've had has shit itself: Ampeg, Fender, Marshall, whatever. The good long lasting stuff is generally the cheaper stuff like Peavey, Acoustic, H||H, all vintage gear I have which works perfectly.

      My father also plays regularly and he bought a Behringer bass head and has no problem with it.

    15. Re:No shit by cstacy · · Score: 1

      My 8-channel Eurorack UB802 blew up after about 6 months; lots of people report failures. I suspect there are even more failures, but they're so cheap (about $60) that people just replace them with something else and move on.

      In my case, a PV8, which includes a 5 year warranty.

    16. Re:No shit by KeNickety · · Score: 1

      It was probably made in Germany, rather than china.

    17. Re:No shit by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I have two Behringer 10-channel mixing boards (one for work, one for home) to hook all my computers into one set of speakers. I bought them because they weren't expensive, and they've worked great for years.

    18. Re:No shit by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      Behringer gear tends to be extremely hit-or-miss. You can expect it to either fail immediately after the warranty period has passed, or to last decades. If you're doing any sort of live performances, I probably don't need to tell you why this is an extremely bad thing.

      Oh the other hand, if you're playing small gigs, have spares, and find the gear to be of acceptable quality, then I'd say it's worth it! We had a set of Behringer speakers in our rental stocks a few years back that blew the equivalent JBL/Yamaha products out of the water, only cost us about half as much, and were nigh indestructible.

      On the other hand, we've also encountered Behringer mixers with scratchy pots that would fail if you looked at them the wrong way.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  31. iAudio U3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I purchased an iAudio U3 some time ago. They don't seem to be in production anymore, but they were packed with features, including in-line recording. Very convenient for recording short clips right to the player on occasion, from other friends players if we were on the go.

  32. they had boost turned off, forgot to mention by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    Forgot to mention that they were using the Mic input with the boost turned off.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  33. oh my by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why people will spend five grand on a laptop, get pissed about its lack of features but at home still have an 8 year old computer that they relay on for all of their real work and data backup. Get a $500 desktop, it will outclass your laptop easily if you build it yourself and skip the microsoft tax. As far as speed and utility are concerned it'll blow any laptop away... then get a netbook for travel. If you're trying to rip 8tracks to MP3 while sitting in Starbucks, you're doing it wrong.

    1. Re:oh my by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he skips the "Microsoft tax" what the fuck will his apps run on? Linsux certainly doesn't have any worthwhile audio apps.

      Eoither you're a fucking troll or your a fucking retard. Probably both.

    2. Re:oh my by LardBrattish · · Score: 1

      The answer to your question is that he lives in Australia where you can get a tax break on laptops but not desktops.

      --
      What are you listening to? (http://megamanic.blogetery.com/)
    3. Re:oh my by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eoither you're a fucking troll or your a fucking retard. Probably both.

      May I say the same to you sir.

  34. My question is by proxima · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why don't all car radio setups come with a line-in jack? Even many of the aftermarket ones don't have them (on the front, at least). Such a cheap part, and yet so many people use their ipods via FM tuner or tape adapter.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    1. Re:My question is by speedlaw · · Score: 1

      Because up to the advent of the iPod car makers wanted to lock you into expensive in car players. Once the entire world gave up "discs" they had to come around. I'm just amazed how much they can charge for a 1/8 stereo jack and some wire. Makes Monster Cable look like the dollar store.

    2. Re:My question is by toxicity69 · · Score: 1

      In my experience, Japanese cars from say 2005 onwards tend to have line-ins.

    3. Re:My question is by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Why don't all car radio setups come with a line-in jack? Even many of the aftermarket ones don't have them (on the front, at least). Such a cheap part, and yet so many people use their ipods via FM tuner or tape adapter.

      Because a line-in jack can't control your device from the steering wheel controls. Get a DICE box or similar and do it properly.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    4. Re:My question is by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I really like the look of those things; just wish they didn't bypass some of the iPod's functionality (EQ and possibly "sound check" iirc)

      Not that I blame DICE for this, i think it's just how the ipod is made.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    5. Re:My question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone uses an iphone as their mp3 player. The line-in jack is universal.

    6. Re:My question is by merreborn · · Score: 1

      Why don't all car radio setups come with a line-in jack? Even many of the aftermarket ones don't have them (on the front, at least). Such a cheap part, and yet so many people use their ipods via FM tuner or tape adapter.

      My cheap-ass '06 Toyota Scion came with one, standard. They also offered an iPod dock kit for a couple hundred bucks more.

    7. Re:My question is by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Even freaking Aveos have line-in standard nowadays, IIRC.

      It's just aftermarket that sucks. And I have a low-end head unit that has rear-accessible line-in, and ran a cable to my car's center console for that.

    8. Re:My question is by sys_mast · · Score: 1

      Odd, the last aftermarket radio i bought for a car had one. A basic unit ~$150. So i guess you should put your money where your mouth is and only purchase units that have that feature. If everyone did that that is all companies would make.

      As others have said, lots of cars now come with that standard. If you don't have it, you may be able to add line it via CD changer or other input. (yes and extra purchase)

      If not everyone avoids units without, apparently it's not that important.

      --
      Those who can, do.
    9. Re:My question is by socrplayr813 · · Score: 1

      I know this probably isn't terribly helpful, but my Mazda has a standard line-in jack that I plug my mp3 player into. It's newer (2009), but I believe most or all Mazda3s from this generation have them (going back to 2004?) and I'm quite confident that the more expensive cars in their lineup have it too. Just saying... there are cars out there that don't force you into that $50+ add-on or iPod-only crap. Granted, I can't control what plays using the steering wheel controls, but it does the job just fine

      --
      The confidence of ignorance will always overcome the indecision of knowledge.
    10. Re:My question is by emgeemg · · Score: 1

      I've got a 2004 Mazda3 and I can tell you that it doesn't have a line-in. I wish.

  35. Reason: why no line-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Many older sound cards were shipped with line-out, microphone-in, and a line-in jacks. For years I've used such a line-in jack on an old Windows 2000 dinosaur desktop that I bought in 2000 (600 Mhz PIII) to capture the stereo audio signal from an old Technics receiver.

    We've arranged this with hardware manufacturers, so that you stop pirating music, Johnny.
    regards,
    RIAA

  36. It seems to be replaced by a digital audio jack by gman003 · · Score: 1

    At least on my laptop. It has the normal three jacks, but I only just now saw that one was not the "line in", but an "SPDIF Out". Doesn't affect me either way, since I don't use either, but that may be behind some of the displacement. My drivers could probably change it around, though.

    1. Re:It seems to be replaced by a digital audio jack by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but no. Input audio circuitry - line in - will be analog. SPDIF out will be output circuitry, and digital to boot. No driver can change that.

    2. Re:It seems to be replaced by a digital audio jack by gman003 · · Score: 1

      I was talking about switching the mic or headphone jacks to line in, not the SPDIF. Moot point, since I just poked around the driver controls. No changes. Although setting the gain lower on the mic could probably give me the same effect as line in.

  37. This article got published? really? by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 1

    There is no conspiracy. Most people don't need line-ins on a laptop. Either:

    1. Find a larger laptop that has the jacks
    2. Purchase an external sound device (i.e. USB)
    3. Use a desktop

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
  38. Gasp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't plug your trumpet in!? Please tell me more about it.

  39. Umm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what line-in jack?

  40. Use Mic jack by BobPaul · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've yet to buy a computer with fewer than 3 jacks (out, line in, mic in generally alternatively selectable as out1, out2, out3 for surround). But if you really don't have a line in, use the Mic jack and uncheck the "Microphone Boost" option. The +20dB boost is the difference between mic level and line level.

    1. Re:Use Mic jack by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, the gain level is not the only difference between a line and mic jack. PC mic jacks are mono only; you'll only get one channel of the stereo signal. And it'll probably still be overloaded and distorted, because line level is likely higher than the mic input expects even with the +20dB boost (which some soundcards don't even support) disabled.

  41. There is no difference (most of the time) by marcansoft · · Score: 1

    Most Intel HDA codecs just treat all jacks the same, the only difference is the settings. If you want to play around, grab HDA Analyzer and tweak things to your heart's consent. For example, on my laptop (3 jacks), I can output 5.1 audio, or output 4.0 plus get one mic, or 4.0 plus one input, or output stereo cloned through two jacks (great for listening with a friend), or even make all jacks inputs, route them to the three stereo ADCs, and capture 5.1 analog audio. In fact, as far as I can tell, the only "special" jack is the headphones jack, which appears to go through some sort of extra amp to boost it as an output (more than the codec chip is documented to do, though strangely it still works as an input; it might just be another case of Realtek failing at documentation). Other than that, each jack has "in" and "out" options, a headphone boost option (this is the standard one built-in to the codec), a set of mic preamp settings, and a mic vref setting.

    In other words, you just need the right software to do whatever you want with your audio jacks these days. Crappy drivers (both on Linux and Windows) will usually severely limit you, compared to the capabilities of the hardware. At least under Linux, you can always use HDA Analyzer to poke the real hardware settings (on Windows, you're probably SOL).

  42. but... by Velox_SwiftFox · · Score: 1

    Where will I plug in my high-fidelity stereo aux?

  43. If it's vinyl you have... by actionbastard · · Score: 1

    Then you need a USB turntable:

    http://www.usbturntables.net/

    Many decent ones available in the $100 US - $200 US range.

    --
    Sig this!
    1. Re:If it's vinyl you have... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Or a stand-alone phono preamp. With USB out, TOSlink out, line in and line out. http://www.artproaudio.com/products.asp?type=90&cat=13&id=128

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:If it's vinyl you have... by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      Do any of these come with decent phono cartridges? I rather doubt it, especially at the low end of that range. If you're trying to get high-quality rips, you probably ought to be spending upwards of $75 for the cartridge alone... a nice mid-range Audio Technica or somesuch.

  44. I see both sides by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

    I'm a DJ, so I've got lots of various audio gear lying around. I've got a Numark mixer with USB out/in, an M-Audio MobilePRE USB, an M-Audio Connectiv, a Stanton ScratchAmp, a Creative X-Fi Notebook Expresscard, and an old Creative Extigy...and EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM sounds orders of magnitude better than the integrated audio chipset in my laptop when it comes to recording audio. While I agree with some of the other posters that many laptops these days have ports that pull double duty based on software, if you're looking for any sort of fidelity to your audio, you're going to want an external solution anyway.

    Of all of the laptops I've used, the best noise floor I've ever gotten was -35db. there's this hiss that's present in every single one of the recordings I've made. In some recordings that have a very low dynamic range and are recorded at around -0.5db with a decent amount of loudness, the hiss is somewhat hidden and I can get away with it. In recordings with ANY amount of dynamic range at all, the hiss is audible and drives me up a wall. If you've ever heard the audio from a $200 handheld camcorder, you'll know what i'm talking about. On the other hand, the worst offender on the list above is the Numark mixer. My guess is that it is largely based on the fact that it has an integrated power transformer, unlike the rest of the list there. Even at that, the worst noise floor I've ever gotten from that mixer is -70db. You'd have to crank your stereo to about 8.5 to hear the hiss out of that thing. The MobilePRE USB is probably the best, with a floor of around -90db. You can crank your stereo to 11 and you'll hear hiss from your amp before you hear hiss from its recordings. Finally, the higher end stuff here (MobilePRE, Connectiv, Numark Mixer) all have inputs that inherently provide a better signal (XLR and/or RCA) than an 1/8" cable. Simultaneously, if you're recording from most sources other than an iPod, you'll need an adapter to make it fit an 1/8" jack anyway.

  45. Check the options for the mic jack by ross.w · · Score: 1

    My Toshiba satellite only has a mic input, but when it senses that you have plugged something in, it pops up a dialog to ask whether you have plugged in a microphone or a line level audio source, and then configures the levels appropriately.

    Yours may be similar. Try plugging into the mic input and see what results you get. If it doesn't work, you'll get horribly distorted audio. In that case, you'll need a USB audio adaptor.

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  46. No line in on laptops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Folks here are imagining things. I've been buying laptops since before the Toshiba T1000. None. . . . none, have ever had line-in. NO laptop has line in. None. Not one. Mic in is not the same thing. If you want line-in for a laptop, you need to buy an external soundcard. Even though some people use it for one, and it can be done, the mic in not the same, and won't work for really critical work.

    1. Re:No line in on laptops by Quarters · · Score: 1
      "NO laptop has line in. None, Not one."

      It's admirable that you are so specific and resolute in your statement. It's too bad that your statement is demonstrably incorrect. All Macbook and Macbook Pro models, except for the Macbook Air, have analog line-in jacks. the 15" and 17" Macbook Pros have a dedicated line in jack. The Macbook and the 13" Macbook Pro both use a single 1/8" jack for either analog out, digital out, or analog line in, depending on how that port is configured in the system preferences.

  47. Seriously?! by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    Please. http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Transit.html On order, will review and repost. But, please. There are plenty of USB and FireWire (IEEE1394) devices that have -6 dB line in jacks; from 1/8" stereo to multi-input XLR, 24-bit/96kHz no less!

    1. Re:Seriously?! by Hutchizon · · Score: 1

      I use the m-audio Transit, from looking at their site it hasn't changed in the 5 or so years since I purchased it. Its worked fine, I used it while converting some old vinyl 80s music that never made it big enough to enter the digital era. Hardest problem was post-processing the audio, but that was more due to my turntable & needle. Kids, I'll tell you a story about shopping for turntable needles someday when I have time.

    2. Re:Seriously?! by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      Kids, I'll tell you a story about shopping for turntable needles someday when I have time.

      Been there. Done that. Bottom line: You get what you pay for in the analog world, and in a number of cases in the digital world, as well.

      And sorry, but what does that have to do with the state of available devices with line-in (-6 dB) jacks? That was the OP's original complaint. My assertion was that there are a plethora of devices from the inexpensive to the expensive with line-in jacks, and that there is certainly no need to keep (and bemoan) an ancient system for such utility.

  48. Macs by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Macs are different.

    They only have line-in, no microphone in.

  49. Almost always the rule when correcting others. by chaboud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know that it's an age-old rule of correcting others that one makes a mistake of the same nature in the corrective statement (I'm likely to suffer a few), but those phone jacks that you list (typically called TS for tip-sleeve when mono or TRS for tip-ring-sleeve when stereo or balanced mono) are most commonly sized in 1/4", 3.5mm, and 2.5mm. 1/2" would be awesome, but I've never seen one.

    1. Re:Almost always the rule when correcting others. by KibibyteBrain · · Score: 1

      A half inch jack wouldn't make any sense in practice. At that point two smaller connectors could have a more compact footprint with less noise. Even an XLR would be a competitive option. And of course in this era, you could run digital coax/optical at 192khz with a smaller footprint and see even less noise with both channels[or more] and having the ADC as close to the source amplifer on-board, as possible.

    2. Re:Almost always the rule when correcting others. by chaboud · · Score: 1

      I meant awesome in a Soviet Russia sort of way. Bulky connectors never stop making me grin.

    3. Re:Almost always the rule when correcting others. by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 2, Funny

      A half inch jack wouldn't make any sense in practice.

      You'd think, but a little-known fact about the 1/2" jack is that it can, in a pinch, substitute for .50cal ammunition.

      --
      FGD 135
    4. Re:Almost always the rule when correcting others. by somersault · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's what she said

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:Almost always the rule when correcting others. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "A half inch jack wouldn't make any sense in practice."

      I see somebody doesn't own any XLR microphones.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    6. Re:Almost always the rule when correcting others. by tom17 · · Score: 1

      That's not a PhonE jack, Bob.

    7. Re:Almost always the rule when correcting others. by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      ... and it sounds AWESOME!

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  50. try google! by oldbenway · · Score: 1

    Starting to think the OP didn't use google (or set foot in a Microcenter/Fry's/BestBuy in the last 5 years). There's a million sub-$100 USB line-level devices out there that will do the trick nicely. And now that I am done being a jerk, I'll say I am a fan of m-audio stuff for casual recording, but any of those sub-$100 doodads should be about the same level of quality, and if you're careful and read the packaging, you'll get something that can handle a line level input without distorting. A heck of a lot easier than keeping a lame old PC just b/c it has an input jack.

  51. It's still there ... you just can't see it :) by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

    Most laptop's "mic in" port is actually stereo. The only issue is, a real line-in expects a Phantom, while the mic-in doesn't. You can do one of two things:

    a) Buy a phantom remover, or make your own. They are very cheap, and you can even make one in 10 minutes with only basic soldering skills Google for it.
    b) If it's something quick, and quality isn't a major issue, you can try setting the gain for that port really down and recording that way. It works fine most of the time.

    Stop looking for USB devices with a line-in. I've already looked, there are none.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    1. Re:It's still there ... you just can't see it :) by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      Stop looking for USB devices with a line-in. I've already looked, there are none.

      oh, really?
      Next time try harder.

    2. Re:It's still there ... you just can't see it :) by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      This product is not available for purchase at this time.

      It's been like that for a long time.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    3. Re:It's still there ... you just can't see it :) by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      ok, then there is m-audio transit, which is available.

  52. How fancy do you want? by Ma'at · · Score: 1

    Hard to beat this: http://www.vintageking.com/Prism-Sound-Orpheus?sc=18&category=388

    There are tons of sound input devices marketed for music recording, and pretty much every price point you'd care to hit. The Prism is pretty top-of-the-line, but I'm sure there is something that would fit your needs if you just want to back up LPs here:

    http://www.sweetwater.com/c695--USB_Audio_Interfaces

  53. Really?!? by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

    I've looked around for USB sound cards that include a line-in jack, but I haven't been too impressed by the selection.

    It's one of the most saturated segments of audio gear: Sweetwater has 119 models. For audio stuff it's frequently a good call to buy a "professional" product; the consumer stuff is designed with the - mostly correct - assumption that people don't care about audio quality.

    --
    ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
  54. *Please* let analogue content die once and for al! by hackel · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'm glad my laptop doesn't have a line-in, what a waste that would be! It's a very *specialist* use-case that should not be installed standard. Are there really that many old records that haven't been converted to digital yet? Or is the problem just that certain people don't think they are entitled to download a digital version of something they already own without paying for it a second time?

  55. uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no

  56. my 1520 has a dual use port by majortom1981 · · Score: 1

    My inspiron 1520 has a mic/line in port. can be either one. I think its more of a space issue. Anyway they havent been gotten rid of. Just combined with the mic port

  57. Don't get a laptop then by Braedley · · Score: 1

    "[A]ll of the four laptops I've bought since then have omitted a line-in jack."

    [Jamie Hyneman]Well there's your problem[/Jamie]
    Of course laptops have started leaving out the line in jack. This is because the input gain on a mic-in can be brought down to a line in level, and as a previous poster mentioned, is already stereo. Anyone serious enough to need a line in will most likely be using a PCI Express card, or at the worst an on board 5.1 audio chip (which will almost always include at least one plug that can be used for line in). The extra complexity to include a line in on a laptop simply isn't worth it for most manufacturers. For much less than $1000, you can get a brand new computer with a decent sound card to do what you want. Suck it up if it means that much to you.

  58. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The easiest way to convert a mic level input to line level is to use a simple t-pad attenuator you can make yourself. R1 & R3 = 600 ohms, R2 = 22 ohms. I use this myself with absolutely no loss of fidelity.
    http://www.nu9n.com/tpad-calculator.html

  59. just type in some relevant words and press enter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is news for nerds, stuff that matters? "newsflash! asshole can't figure out how to google something, details at 11!"

  60. More importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...why don't cars come with 8-track decks anymore? The mind boggles.

  61. Looking in the wrong place? by StormWolf · · Score: 1

    There are a ton of USB, Firewire and PCI audio interfaces on the market that do what you ask. You just have to move a little bit beyond consumer electronics stores such as BestBuy:

  62. You could do it this way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about line going extinct, mine has one...

    As a professional musician, I tend to use something like this: http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/-Lambda-USB-Desktop-Studio?sku=245506 to record music into my computer. You can easily buy a 1/8th" stereo or TRS to 2 1/4" line Y cable, or some cable / adapter combo to accomplsh this task.

  63. DONT. WANT. TO. KNOW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh great. More outboard gear to update, effit.

  64. Yes by PulkitGoel · · Score: 1

    I Think Yes, USB OTG Will Replace Completely...:)

  65. laptop != pro audio equipment by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    That's all well and good, but the mic inputs on a sound card or laptop won't accept line level input without the signal being attenuated to mic levels. They're designed for a normal moving coil or condenser mic input and that's all.

    I'm not sure what a high-output pro audio mic has to do with this discussion. Just because one particular mic can produce high amplitude signals does not mean that a normal sound card mic input will accept them. Pro audio equipment that can accept a +8dBV input has little relevance to a sound card or laptop mic input which is designed for a cheap consumer grade microphone that works at a much lower level like -68dBV.

    The simple fact of the matter is that the engineers who design the inexpensive audio hardware used in PCs expect the microphone input to be used to connect a microphone and not much else. If you want to connect something else, then you have to convert the signal level to the acceptable range for the input.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:laptop != pro audio equipment by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      The point was that it is possible for a mic input with the gain boost disabled to serve as a line in, as lots of hardware does this already. Whether the cheap, crappy sound hardware built into a laptop will actually bother is another question, but clearly it's possible. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  66. Recording can be a challenge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need to record stuff. (me blabbing)

    Thing is, sound cards are subject to lots of internal interference. It's bad enough to torture my listeners with my speech, they shouldn't have to listen to crappy recordings as well.

    This is why you don't want to simply attenuate a mic-in, low-z input will pull in lots of noise from the computer itself.

    Also, if you're using compressors and other effects, you'll probably want a 24 bit recording (even if the finished product is 16 bit) because these effects can distort it (yes, even digital effects run after the initial recording..) my current setup introduces distortion, and the box lied.. it's not 24-bit..

    For this reason, I've been looking at external USB "m-audio" sound cards, but I haven't heard anything about whether you get a true 24-bit, 96khz sampling rate on a linux box. Lots of stuff about "yea, works great" but no one seems to be willing to verify the sampling rate or whether it's truly 24 bit or some cooked up format. Haven't heard anything about the phantom power either.

    It does seem line-in is a thing of the past, ask around and all you see are cards designed for playback.

  67. We need them, but they could be better! by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    Microphone and line-in jacks are definitely under-appreciated these days. Of course, less people need line-in jacks than used to, but microphone jacks are vital to online gaming. All the same, they could make them more robust. A couple years ago, I built two nearly-identical new computers, one for me, and one for my father.

    A couple months later, he wanted to hook up the microphone that came with the motherboard so he could use VOIP, I talked him through it, and it wasn't working... Finally, I took the microphone and plugged it into my computer...suddenly my microphone jack didn't work anymore... I still don't know what was wrong with the mic (It was the same exact one I had already had plugged into my motherboard) but it fried the mic ports on both motherboards. I've recently taken to using my studio mic and mixer setup through a USB audio device for playing Left4Dead2 online with friends.... The sad irony of using a multi-hundred dollar audio rig to communicate things like "SHIT, SHIT, SHIT! KILL THIS FUCKING THING!!!" is palpable.

    The other day, I took part in an online drawing seminar featuring Dave Gibbons... I wanted to record it (Something I wish I had done with the last webinar I attended) so I set up Camtasia Studio, only to find out that if I want to record system sounds, I need to use the line-in... (Nevermind the fact that that is STUPID.) So I took the USB line-in box (A Behringer U-CONTROL, similar to the U-PHONO that someone linked to earlier, but for interfacing a PC with a mixing board) and I literally took a cable and plugged the box's line-out into the line-in. Why is that even necessary? :

    Anyway, I digress. I guess what I'm trying to say is, necessary or not, going extinct or not, I think they're being undermined by various issues and sometimes external devices are your only option, as sad as that may be.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  68. Mic and Line-In are compatible by Jack+Schitt · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty certain that it'll still have a mic port. This will double as a line-in in a pinch. Just turn down the recording source as mics produce a lot lower level than a line-in.

    I helped a tech-savvy friend with this. He asked how I knew that the signaling was compatible. Lulz were had.

    --
    This message brought to you by Jack Schitt's Previously Shat Shit
  69. Not going dead anytime soon by toxicity69 · · Score: 1

    I don't think the line in jack is going to go extinct anytime soon. My current car, and a previous one, both had line-ins, and it was a major factor in the purchase of those vehicles. For the longest time, it was the only way to hook up an iPod or CD player (if the car didn't have one) or other things; I believe the satellite radios did it for awhile too, right?

    Nowadays you can get a new car with an option to be "iPod compatible", but even if it works, it only works with iPods. Also, its an expensive option. A male-to-male line-in cable costs as much as $15 if you can't find a cheap one, but thats the upper limit. The options on new vehicles can add hundreds or thousands. Plus, the line-in "just works".

  70. Most audio ports in computers are configurable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work in the codec and sound card business for the PC market. Most modern computer will have auto-configurable ports for line out, MIC-in, and line out/headphone out. The codec will auto detect when an audio jack is plugged into the system and may show a pop-up dialog box asking the user what kind of jack it is. If there is no pop-up dialog box, then there should be some system control applet to select the LINE IN or MIC IN.

    The line IN and MIC IN needs different handling. The MIC IN has a bias voltage while the LINE IN does not need this bias voltage. When the software is configured properly, this bias voltage is disabled when the user selects the Line IN. I do not foresee the Line IN going away anytime soon since the users will still want to input from their iPod, TV tuners, radio, etc.

  71. M-Audio or Behringer by vmartell · · Score: 1

    After +200 replies, my post will probably be redundant, I will add my vote to the probably many coming for getting a budget pro-audio card. M-Audio, from the Audiophile to some other Firewire/USB products they have should do... if you are really on a budget, try Behringer... word to the wise, ***performance*** wise, they cannot be beat for the price; however, they are ***built*** kind of cheaply...

  72. Don't have to plug in? by nick_davison · · Score: 1

    Well, you know, there are still a couple of people around that play musical instruments (you know, those expensive things you don't have to plug in)

    The best ones still require you to. And they go up to eleven!

    Mind you, I'm yet to see a laptop with a class-A set of tubes, either. And no, steampunk fans, gluing some non functioning brasswork and a couple of tubes doesn't make anything other than an ugly mess.

  73. Welcome to basic functionality by Redlazer · · Score: 1
    I have never seen a motherboard or sound card without line in.

    There is also a receiver, connected to the computer. This would get you near-perfect replication in some cases I think. I could be wrong.

    I have the same requirement, as I want to listen to music all the time, and I have all my music on my laptop. My laptop is connected to my desktop to an Asus PCIE sound card, and just recently, I grabbed an HDMI 7.1 receiver.

    The receiver has a plethora of sources available to it, and it is a reasonably intelligent device. It is more reliable than ATI's sound-over-HDMI drivers, which suck. But, I could also tell you that Sarah Palin is an idiot, or that the sky is blue, or that grass is really a pretty cool thing.

    The receiver itself has two options available to it for special recording, some sort of crazy audiophile mumbo jumbo.

    Additionally, most motherboards these days also have auto-sense jacks. You can force the motherboard to use any jack as anything, line in, left/right out, mic, etc.

    --
    Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
    1. Re:Welcome to basic functionality by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      Oh right, as far as laptops are concerned:

      My last Dell E1505 had line in, my Alienware M15x has line in and two audio outs.

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
  74. That will sound like crap by wall0159 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    for two reasons

    1. (as another poster said) - you're attenuating and then amplifying a signal: noise
    2. LPs are recorded with the high frequencies boosted, and this is then attenuated in a dedicated circuit within the receiver. By skipping this, you're going to end up with tinny recordings (did I mention noise?).

    Seriously, unless you've got a nice sound interface, don't bother recording LPs, cassettes, etc - the results won't be worth it. Cetainly that USB thing from thinkgeek (linked earlier) won't produce good recordings. Unless it's a bootleg or something... I've got a nice multitrack firewire interface, and even then I'd only think about recording LPs, cassettes, etc if I had a really nice deck..

    1. Re:That will sound like crap by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      LPs are recorded with the high frequencies boosted, and this is then attenuated in a dedicated circuit within the receiver. By skipping this, you're going to end up with tinny recordings

      The high frequencies are boosted and low frequencies are attenuated when recorded, and the process is reversed on playback (RIAA equalization curve, the reason the RIAA was created in the first place).

      Seriously, unless you've got a nice sound interface, don't bother recording LPs, cassettes, etc - the results won't be worth it.

      What you need isn't a nice interface, but a good input source. With digital there isn't much audible difference between cheap gear and expensive gear[1], but with analog there is a marked difference between a $50 turntable and a $100 turntable, and a HUGE difference between a $100 turntable and a $500 turntable. The same holds true for all analog storage.

      As you say, you can't just plug a turntable in a computer; it will sound like utter crap. You need a preamp with a dedicated input for vinyl that has the crossover equalization, then plug THAT into the PC. A decent receiver will do.

      The good news is, you can get very good equipment cheap, if bought used. I have CDs that I've made from LPs that sound better than the factory copies [2]

      [1] Audiophiles will argue with me on this
      [2] The reason is that those factory CDs were badly mixed; one such is Boston's first album. Another is Led Zeppelin's Presence. There are quite a few more, as well.

    2. Re:That will sound like crap by wall0159 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you (hence my comment at the end about needing a nice deck despite having a nice sound interface). The point I was trying to make was that buying a $100 USB record player was unlikely to yield good results.

      I'd love to hear your recording of Presence - I bought the Led Zep remasters back in 1994 and think they sound pretty good (I don't think they're as heavily compressed as later "digitally remastered" recordings), but I'd be interested to hear the original mix!

    3. Re:That will sound like crap by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That's about the time I bought my CD copy of it. There are missing dynamics, missing deep bass, and missing treble. The treble I can almost understand, but there is no reason for missing dynamics or bass except maybe the remastering sound engineers aren't as good, or maybe they didn't spend the money on sound engineering; I read that Led Zeppelin II had 24 sound engineers that worked on it.

      I wish that for those older, originally analog recordings they's just run the mixed master tape through a curve equalizing circuit and just sample it. I'd REALLY like to have a copy of Dark Side of the Moon like that; the CD version of that album was disapointing.

      There are used record stores you can sometimes find old LPs, but the bad thing is the ones that are plainly superior to their CD counterparts are more rare; people don't want to let go of them.

  75. Just get some USB sound card with decent preamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, those integrated sound cards still suck :) They have gotten better within 5 years, but not yet match for external devices. I've been using this MobilePre, mainly for LInux support when I got it. Not pro-quality, seems bit pricey to specs, but has nice features for random home recording: decent preamp, XLR, 3/4 balanced/unbalanced, hi-z line and knobs for gain and headphone volume. I guess those newer Fast Track cards give better quality.

    If you need only 2-4 channels, you'll be happy with USB device. Last time I checked Linux had good support only for USB1.1 devices (max 2 channel), and no USB2.0 devices (max 4 channel). If need more channels and bit lower latency get some Firewire device. Anyway you'll get better quality than with integrated.

    How about something like this for mobile use, it's just a/d converter and very small size. Just line input, but for DAT-replacement might be good choice.

    http://www.m-audio.com/products/en_us/Transit.html

    By the way, try Audacity for recording software. It's quite simple and easy to use for simple recordings.

    http://audacity.sourceforge.net/

  76. Issues with line in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My mac mini has a line in instead a mic in, it works flawlessy for registration stuff, but i need to buy a usb active microphone to talk with my friend trough skype.

  77. What's wrong with USB sound cards? by AC-x · · Score: 1

    What do you mean you're not impressed by the selection of USB sound cards? You've got everything from basic £15 5.1 with mic and line in which are on par with motherboard's onboard sound (I use one on my laptop) to 10 input 24-bit 96kHz professional audio interfaces like the Edirol UA-101.

    Also, do the laptops not have a mic socket? you can usually turn mic gain on and off in the sound control panel which essentially turns it into a line-in socket anyway.

    1. Re:What's wrong with USB sound cards? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      In many ways, USB sound cards are better, mostly because you can put the input A/D close to the source rather than wavelengths away. In reality, the best situation is to have the A/D right on the instrument, with a S/PDIF digital output on the instrument itself.

      The closer the A/D is to the source of what you want to record, the better.

    2. Re:What's wrong with USB sound cards? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Yes, and there is often significantly less noise from USB than from the onboard or PCI board audio.

      With USB, the signal is digital by the time it gets near the case full of variable magnetic fields.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:What's wrong with USB sound cards? by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Another true point, indeed. However, a well-designed PCI board will be largely immune, and in a modern PC, there is very little down in audio frequencies anymore. Even DC-DC converters run into the several MHz these days.

      I've never been able to detect any AF noise from the PC in the two PCI cards I have (10 channels each).

  78. RCA plugs .... bad design... by klubar · · Score: 1

    There's a problem with the design of the RCA connectors... The signal path is connected before the ground.

  79. Aaaand...you've missed the point of this nonstory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Australia makes the front page of Slashdot again!

    AUSSIE! AUSSIE! AUSSIE!

    OY! OY! OY!

    Whoo!

    Yeah!

    Go Australia!

    Sniff... I'm so proud!

  80. Short answer: NO by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Long answer: You will ALWAYS have (even low-end) musician sound cards with analog inputs. Since the very point of those sound cards is, to have really good A/D converters. (Often lots of them, and pretty expensive ones too.)

    Reality still is analog. Speakers are, Microphones are. And will always be, as long as they exist in reality.
    And the only difference from a microphone jack and a line-in jack is the amplification. Which is configurable to whatever you like on any serious sound card anyway. :) /me still loves his trusty old DMX 6fire 24/96. :) (I also have a Audigy and a onboard one. And when I switch back and forth, both sound like totally distorted crap.)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  81. Anything-in by hrimhari · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, when there's only one "in", you can tell the sound mixer if it's a "line" or "mic" input. Try these steps (in Windows XP, on my Dell D620):

    1. Double-click the speaker icon in your task bar. The Mixer application (with multiple volume levels) should open.
    2. Click on Options, then Properties. The Properties window should appear.
    3. Select "Adjust volume for" "Recording".
    4. Click OK. The mixer now morphed into the "in" controls.
    5. Under "Line In", click on [ ] Select. Your "in" should magically become a line-in input.
    6. Enjoy!

    --
    http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
  82. iPod, iPhone, MacBook Pro, iMac, E-Mu, Tascam by gig · · Score: 1

    An E-Mu or Tascam USB interface is about $150 and is 24-bit and works with Mac or PC. A MacBook Pro or iMac not only has a line-in, it's 24-bit and is both analog and digital optical. iPods and iPhones have line-ins on the dock connector, you just need the right cable. Probably iPad is the same.

    Generally speaking, pro audio is FireWire-based.

    If recording LP, make sure you have the right preamplifier. LP doesn't give out a line level signal.

  83. Nothing to see here. Move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy a better computer.

  84. I hope not by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    How else am I going to bug my bosses office?

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  85. Most motherboards have a line in by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

    Pretty much every motherboard I've bought in the past ~5 years has had a line in jack. Before you complain that the fidelity of onboard audio sucks, let me point out that it has gotten a lot better lately (at least on reputable brands like Asus). While onboard may still not be up to true high fidelity standards, it is "good enough" for the majority of non-professional use cases.

  86. Scary analog hole. by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Autodetection is the scary part. If the computer can detect whether the port should be an input, or an output, or whether it should be stereo or not, how long before it can detect whether there is a DRM signal embedded in the input and shut it down? Autodetection is the first step in closing the analog hole.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  87. Strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...most mb I've seen still have the full complement of audio I/O ports, and two MSI notebooks that I've had in the last 18m, one just coming up on 1y old both have had line-in plus the rest of the ports as well as digital. I'd expect Apple product to have FAR fewer I/O ports, and possibly some of the other "brands", e.g. Lenovo. But also remember many companies don't even make their own notebooks(MSI & Asus do), but re-badge from OEMs like Clevo/Sager or MSI, e.g. Alienware. (These companies and a few other make notebook chassis, motherboard and LCD leaving CPU/RAM/hdd/optical disk/possibly GPU up to a re-seller to fill so you'd still have the same basic I/O ports that the base model offered. In the case of MSI it's a better deal in the end to buy their retail products v. a build from a re-seller unless you want to customize something beyond what MSI offers as a retail model in your region, e.g. hdd, CPU. Most MSI barebones come pre-packaged with the GPU while Clevo/Sager usually have options.)

    Probably want to check online for particular notebook specs, and maybe even consider purchasing online v. the limited offerings that b&m stores tend to have or the cut down version that they offer at inflated prices. (My favorite is "Best" Buy with lower specs/less warranty so that they can load on their overpriced extended warranty on you, but it generally isn't worth it even at their sale prices as they tend to have low res LCD panels v. say what ASUS would offer through better retailers... mostly small shops and/or online warranty case here 1y + then buy "Best" Buy's plans v. 1y accidental damage coverage + 2 additional years of general warranty coverage. MSI has 2y general warranty coverage IIRC, and their chassis are noticeably smaller than ASUS/Clevo in the same class range. Tom's hardware has a review of a quad core GT725(I have dual/P8600) from last summer IIRC, although their build quality comments GREATLY differ from mine, e.g. wobbly battery? Also a thing about MSI is that their 17"(Gx 7yz (x=X or T, y/z = 0-9, MS-17yz barebones) models have a noticeably better build quality than their 15" models Gx 6yz (MS-16yz barebones)... those tend to have keyboard "flex" problems)

    Also, I'd seriously consider another desktop just for upgradeability unless you really need/want a mobile platform.

    Also, have you looked to see if there are any USB audio products? Or possibly Express Card Audio(newer external slot interface for notebooks) cards w/line-in? As a way around the base limitations of a desired model...

  88. There are many many many options by TransientAlias · · Score: 1

    try zzounds.com or guitar center for usb or firewire connected audio i/o devices... look in the category "computer recording"

  89. M-Audio Fast Track by ebunga · · Score: 1

    Over the past ten years the price of a decent machine went from a few thousand dollars to a few hundred dollars. Those line-in jacks aren't cheap, so when looking for an easy way to cut costs they're going to drop the stuff 99.9% of the population doesn't need.

    I found a need for a line-in and went searching. Came across the m-audio fast track. It costs $99 and comes with the stripped down pro-tools m-powered essentials, which is good enough unless you're doing something that needs more than like 16 tracks. The hardware is required for pro-tools to run, but the hardware will work with any other audio software that doesn't tie the software to the hardware, i.e. every other DAW software on the market. The nice thing is that they have it at Best Buy, so you can even get it locally for the immediate impulse buy. There are other options in the avid family, such as the digidesign mbox2 devices that are a little more expensive, but come with pro-tools le, which is a step up from m-powered. For about $2000 to $2500 you can get one of the 003 devices. Then there's the entire universe of non-pro-tools-oriented stuff which costs less and probably has better audio quality but isn't nearly as fun or well integrated.

    Sweetwater, Guitar Center and your local musical instrument and pro-audio store are your best friends. Go there and talk to someone. I had a problem where I was sure a magical $499.95 box was the right move. The sound guy at the local Guitar Center set me straight with the $8 solution. Really, go talk to an audio geek. They can teach you more in a minute hands-on than Ask Slashdot ever could, even if it were loaded with real audio geeks.

    note the difference: Audio geeks know what they're talking about because they deal with professional audio equipment and would rather be called engineers or salesmen or something. Audiophiles masturbate to $800 electron-spin directionally optimized bullshit cables. Do not confuse the two. The pro will tell you your $5000 idea is dumb and all you really need is a $12 device and won't let you buy the $5000 device, even though they're the salesguy and make a commission. An audiophile doesn't do audio for a living, has too much money on their hands, and is now masturbating to the newly announced $3100 replacement for their $800 electron-spin directionally optimized bullshit cables.

  90. Re:*Please* let analogue content die once and for by hackel · · Score: 1

    The immaturity of people on this site never ceases to amaze me. My post was making a very valid point that is topical to the discussion.

  91. It's About _All_ Jacks by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

    It has nothing to do with the line in jack. It has to do with the desire to eliminate all jacks except USB/FireWire. Simplifies manufacturing and design costs, maybe? But, lots have disappeared; parallel, serial, keyboard, etc. All replaced with one do-everything digital jack. As others have pointed out, an audio/USB is a $10 purchase and up, depending on your needs.

    --
    Sleep is for the Weak