Slashdot Mirror


'Bloatware' Becoming a Problem On Android Phones

elrous0 writes "According to a recent article in Wired, consumers of many new Android devices (including Samsung's Vibrant and HTC's EVO) are complaining about the increasing presence of something that has plagued consumer PC's for years: Bloatware (or, to use the more kind euphemism, 'Pre-installed software' that the computer manufacturer gets paid to include on a new PC). Unfortunately the bloatware (aka 'crapware') that comes with these phones has a nasty quality not found on even the most bloated PC: it can't be removed. Many angry consumers have begun to complain openly about this disturbing trend."

415 comments

  1. Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    NASCAR!!!!! Argh!

    1. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by WilyCoder · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly, I am so pissed I can't remove that crap from my EVO.

    2. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Slashdot+Suxxors · · Score: 2, Informative

      Root your Android phone and then you can remove it.

    3. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by jshabad00 · · Score: 1

      But at least the Sprint apps are full-featured and not trial only. That sets them apart from true bloatware.

    4. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Matatouille09 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The bloatware on the HTC EVO is all Sprint Apps not an android issue

    5. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Captain+Spam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But at least the Sprint apps are full-featured and not trial only.

      For now.

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    6. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Sprint TV?

    7. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The bloatware on the HTC EVO is all Sprint Apps not an android issue

      It's not an issue with the OS, certainly, but the Android platform in particular and the OHA in general was founded with the intention of putting the carriers back in the drivers seat and give them back the control over the phones that they were beginning to lose to RIM, Danger and Apple. Get it? It's OPEN, thus the user can do whatever it wants with it... Of course the end user is a user, unless they're buying a heavily subsidized and locked phone, in which case they're merely a partner with the real user, the carrier.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    8. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well it is and it isn't.

      What we're seeing here is kinda like Mac vs PC, circa 1998. The PC was the open architecture, manufacturers providing a wide choice of different configurations, all running a powerful operating system that was available to anyone who wanted it, with the manufacturers choosing to differentiate themselves by pre-installing their own software. Meanwhile, the Mac was the closed architecture box with the clearly inferior operating system, but with the manufacturer taking great pains to ensure the user's initial experience was as clean as possible.

      Fast forward to today: Android is open. As with Windows in 1998, Google is making no attempt to control what's done with it (well, actually Microsoft exerted *more* control in 1998 - I mean, Google is allowing, for example, Motorola and AT&T to remove all of the Google components from the version of Android running on the Flip, and replace them with AT&T-branded Yahoo equivalents. As with the Windows example, Android is the superior, open, system, and any manufacturer can get it, and install it on a variety of different configurations of hardware. Meanwhile, Apple has the inferior operating system, but is exerting heavy control on the system. Users have less choices in terms of hardware, they have even less choices when it comes to what they can do with the system, but, and it's a big but, Apple's control extends, just as with the Mac in 1998, to ensuring that the user's initial experience is as clean as possible.

      BTW, unlike Windows, where an application may be spread out in the file system and in terms of entries in the registry, it's relatively simple to remove an Android app if you have root access to the box (ok, that's the tricky bit) - everything's generally in a single file called something like /system/app/ApplicationName.apk.

      This is not to say that's how it should be. But it does make it easier to foresee a future where, if Google gets pissed in the same way Microsoft eventually did about pre-installed crapware, Google's fix could be pretty simple.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    9. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by mlts · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is becoming harder and harder every new model. The N1 (the last easily rootable Android device) is not in production anymore, and newer phones either have signed bootloaders, have hardware tricks to prevent critical filesystems from being remounted R/W, or worse.

    10. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      You mean like City ID on my Verizon android phone? 14 day trial then 2.99 a month afterwards.

    11. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you care about NASCAR.. Since I do not, it is bloatware.

    12. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by revlayle · · Score: 1

      The Sprint bloatware is pretty crappy. I would almost argue that half of the Sense UI crap is bloatware. I am lucky to have a Hero in such that is easy to root and load a new ROM (the hardware, however, is VERY average), so my Android experience is pretty decent these days :)

    13. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by 1001011010110101 · · Score: 5, Informative

      A general android exploit working on every phone has been found already: http://c-skills.blogspot.com/2010/07/android-trickery.html It comes with source :)

    14. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Funny

      > That is becoming harder and harder every new model.

      Not really. It's just Motorola phones that are crippled by design. With HTC and Samsung phones, at least, rooting is more like climbing over a low, wide wall that's lightly textured to make the experience a little bit unpleasant. Truth be told, I'll bet there are more than a few employees at HTC, Samsung, and probably Sprint & T-Mobile who'd LOVE to be running ads right now comparing Verizon and/or Motorola to Soviet Russia and East Berlin, but can't get management to sign off on them ;-)

      Fantasy Sprint/T-Mobile commercial:

      Cute Google Android strapped face-down onto table that looks like a steampunk cross between a horizontal electric chair and a guillotine. Evil guy wearing military-looking uniform (with stylized 'V' logo) pulls out DroidX and cackles (screen wallpaper depicts Berlin Wall), grabs a thick cable with mean-looking plug on the end (like the ones used in the US for 3-phase 480v AC) and says, 'Vee have vays of dealing mit rootuzerz...' while plugging the cable into the Android's ass. Cut to hand grabbing Frankenstein-style knife switch, engaging the power, and a buzzing, high-voltage type noise that just happens to resonate in a way that sounds like the word "Droid!" at the end of a Verizon commercial being yelped in pain.

    15. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 4, Informative

      No it's really not. http://unrevoked.com/ point and click.

    16. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I am so pissed I can't remove that crap from my EVO.

      Can't you just wipe your phone and install a vanilla android build from google?

    17. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 1

      You should totally spend some quality time with Blender and animate that. That could go viral in a heartbeat.

      --
      I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
    18. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      If you grab the source files for many of their blender movies, you can get most of what you need pre designed and pre textured.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    19. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by jmccusker · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the Android platform can become 'Closed' if telco's decide to lock in their own software. This is their choice to do at their own peril.

    20. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > You should totally spend some quality time with Blender and animate that. That could go viral in a heartbeat.

      LOL, one of my undergrad majors was advertising, creative track. Copywriting, though... not art direction. :)

      I *would* appreciate being credited as "Miamicanes" if someone with production skills chooses to make this into a real video, though :)

    21. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      itunes is the most bloated silly crapware ever created,, Try installing it on ubuntu, you can't, try just move a folder of music over to the phone.. Its like the freakin pot calling the kettle black!

    22. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by DramaGeek · · Score: 1

      Nope. I'm no developer (I've rooted my Droid, but have no experience beyond that), so I'm not 100% sure why, but I believe that it's due to the drivers. I think that each phone has it's own proprietary drivers that can't be legally distributed or something.

    23. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by jejones · · Score: 1

      And NFL, while we're at it.

    24. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Signed bootloaders do nothing against rooting, see that the droid X has been rooted already for proof.

    25. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Any evidence that this works on anything other than DroidX?

    26. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by david_thornley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Interesting view of history.

      In 1998, Microsoft had two operating system lines, one for more serious computing and one for personal computing, neither clearly superior to Mac OS. The merger into the clearly superior XP was in the future. Moreover, the field was and had been dominated by Microsoft for various business reasons, and there wasn't much room for expansion left in the market.

      In 2010, I've seen no evidence that Android is better or worse than iOS. It's theoretically more open, but much more vulnerable to what the cell phone carriers want to do to it. The market is still wide open, and anybody with a claim for previous dominance has been losing market share fairly fast. The limits on what a user can do with a non-jailbroken iPhone are not onerous to most people in practice. In short, I really don't see much of a comparison.

      In addition, neither Windows 95/98, Windows NT, Mac OS9, or iOS was or is open source. Android is. That means that Google can't really enforce anything on the cell phone companies, since they really don't need Google's permission for anything. Apple enforces what AT&T can and can't do with the iPhone, and given the choice of giving some corporation power over my phone Apple's a lot nicer a possibility than AT&T or Verizon or Spring. I don't see that Google has any possible fix for bloatware, and would be interested to know what one would be.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    27. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually a signed bootloader will keep root from happening. All it takes is a daemon that runs every so often (couple of seconds) and checks a process list against a manifest of what should have root. Anything not on the list eats a kill -9 signal, and the phone might even be configured to disable itself until reflashed.

    28. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caveman!

      If you root it, trash that daemon from within the exploit (which is not its own process yet).

    29. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 1

      Thats nice for those five phones, but what about the dozens of other Android devices out there? I personally have the Samsung Moment, and while bloatware so far hasn't been *horrible* it is kind of annoying to have the kill a bunch of apps after a reboot, and periodically close the few that like to come back constantly. Rooting may end up being the way I have to go, but it would be nice if the phone companies made some of that junk removable... or at least let you turn it off more permanently.

      --
      William George
    30. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it uses a hole in Android, not in hardware. This should work on all phones running Android.

    31. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Verizon and/or Motorola to Soviet Russia and East Berlin, but can't get management to sign off on them ;-)

      Fun fact, the moto droid was easily rootable, however the GSM droid(milestone) came with a signed boot loader and when it comes to locking down android phones no one can challenge AT&T. Let's make sideloading app damn near impossible.

      PS. Enjoying froyo on an N1 that didn't come w/ tons of bloatware or extra UI fun.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    32. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for the Droid, but the specific problem lots of people have building kernels for HTC phones is the fact that HTC compiles their proprietary binary drivers straight into the kernel itself, then distributes the whole thing as a big monolithic blob. When it's time to distribute the source, they go in, rip out the source to anything proprietary, and dump the rest into a tarball for download. The problem is, you need the functionality provided by those proprietary binary drivers to do use things like wi-fi and the camera, but because they're effectively raw, undocumented binary blobs, you can't easily build a new kernel that incorporates them into it. Worse, all of the furnished build scripts released by HTC fail, because they attempt to reference 'include' files that aren't... well... included.

      The PROPER, Linus-blessed way to incorporate proprietary binary drivers into a Linux kernel is to distribute them as loadable kernel modules. By defining a clear public interface and drawing a clean line between what's proprietary and what's not, you can then create a buildfile that compiles the part you DO have the source to in a way that works seamlessly with the binary kernel modules to which you don't, and everything "Just Works". FSF can bitch about not having the source to the WLAN drivers, but if the choice is binary WLAN drivers or no WLAN at all, .ko loadable kernel modules are a pragmatic compromise that lets you keep the functionality provided by them without breaking your ability to rebuild the rest of the kernel yourself.

    33. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Cerium · · Score: 1

      If that were the case, then unlocked phones wouldn't work (since they don't come with the preloaded garbage locked phones do).

      I don't know why US mobile companies enjoy blasting themselves in the foot like this.

    34. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      An app that does sideloading on all AT&T phones has been released. It is available for Linux, Mac, and Windows.

    35. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So you kill that process while it is not running, since it only runs every couple seconds.

    36. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I bought a Jitterbug. Who's the fool now??

    37. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      OK, here it is... the official flag of the Evil Empire:

      http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/5555/evilempire3.jpg

      Join the 'Droid Liberation Army. Fight the Power. Er, and stuff like that... ;-)

      (Image released under the Creative Commons License)

    38. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      HTC compiles their proprietary binary drivers straight into the kernel itself, then distributes the whole thing as a big monolithic blob. When it's time to distribute the source, they go in, rip out the source to anything proprietary, and dump the rest into a tarball for download.

      How the fuck is that not a GPL violation?!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    39. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by MogNuts · · Score: 1

      Please don't even attempt to argue that MacOS, before MacOS X, was superior.

      Cooperative multi-tasking. Sure, MacOS was superior to Win 3.1.

      At that time I hate to tell you about Win 95 and Win NT, vs. MacOS

    40. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still are.

    41. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recommend anything for the Samsung Moment (M900)?

    42. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tried it with a Sprint HTC Hero. Yeah, didn't work. I still can't remove NASCAR, I can't keep HTC Sense from loading itself even though I don't use it (I use ADW instead), I can't stop Sprint's TV Widget from starting (an refusing to terminate and leave RAM for other apps) even though it's on none of my desktops. Instead, I'm left with the advice that I have to go through some adb hackery to install an older RUU, then I can use unrevoked, and THEN reject Sprint's security certificates in order to disable over-the-air updates.

      Then finally I can their useless apps.

      Google made a spectacular little embedded platform, but it just took hardware manufacturers and service providers colluding to really muck it up. Fuck every handset provider, and fuck every service provider that treats the end user as a second class citizen.

    43. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Pamplona+Slowpoke · · Score: 1

      ... or at least let you turn it off more permanently.

      Somebody will write an app that can kill these processes.

    44. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Open sourced or no, the real difference is that there was then (and is now on Android) a separation of OS and hardware. In the PC market Apple just never stood a chance gaining a large portion of market while the hardware wars were in full swing. Apple defined the teams as Apple vs Everyone. Everyone won. It wasn't until recently when the hardware wars pretty much ended on PCs (how many cores do you really need?) that Apple began to nibble at the dominance of the PC using their strengths, marketing and form.

      The same thing is happening with smart phones. This is very quickly accelerating from software war where Apple had an early lead but Google rapidly caught up (and arguably surpassed them), to a hardware war again. Apple is doing the Everyone vs Apple thing again, and they are going to get creamed again. Cheaper, faster, better is not Apple's motto, but it sure as hell is the motto of the non-early adopter market. On into the mix the fact that Google is no Microsoft, and I think Apple will be lucky to keep their head above the water in terms of software too.

    45. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Because the actual GLP'd kernel code is available, just without the proprietary drivers. There is no violation because the source code is available.

    46. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      I know this is a side point, but can we PLEASE stop with the rubbish about the Nexus One being "not in production"? Google simply stopped selling it from their store. The N1 is very much alive, and indeed is still being launched from new carriers around the world (eg: Vodafone in Australia just a month ago).

    47. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Miamicanes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Because the actual GLP'd kernel code is available, just without the proprietary drivers.
      > There is no violation because the source code is available.

      Actually, no. It *is* pretty much a clear-cut open and shut GPL2 violation. FSF can argue with Linus over whether or not loadable kernel modules are or are not part of the kernel proper (and thus subject to requirements that their source be released), but I don't think there's *anyone* who's going to argue that what HTC does is OK.

      The problem is, you can't just go and sue someone for "violating the GPL(2)". You have to prove in court that:

      1) You have standing to bring the case (ie, you're one of the people who collectively own the Linux kernel's copyright)

      2) The court you've chosen is the proper venue to pursue the case.

      3) The code you contributed is in the kernel they shipped.

      4) The source files they released were legally inadequate to fulfill their obligations as a licensee under the GPL2

      5) You suffered real harm due to their actions.

      Getting past step 1 could easily cost tens of thousands of dollars and involve multiple court appearances. Rest assured, the defendant's law firm is going to do everything they can to cast doubt upon your standing. If that fails, they're going to do everything they can to challenge your choice of venue (ie, the authority of the court to hear your case, and its appropriateness).

      3? The easy part. Don't smile yet, because 4's going to be a bitch.

      4) Have fun proving they violated the GPL2. Common sense might dictate it, but there's surprisingly little case law to actually cite one way or another because most lawsuits involving the GPL end up getting settled at the last minute & vanish from the legal radar.

      5) This is the toughest of all. To get the grand prize you really want -- equitable relief granting a plea to force them to "go forth and sin no more", you have to prove that their actions have harmed you. The best-case here is probably if you own the device they shipped without the source and was unable to build your own copy of the kernel you helped develop and partially own because of their infringement. Of course, if you had to root your phone to get it into a state where it's physically possible to make use of such a kernel, you can bet they're going to throw every legal theory they can at you in the hope something will stick and get you classified as having "unclean hands" (ie, you're at least partly responsible for your plight). They might prevail, they might not, but they'll fight hard & fight dirty.

      However, it doesn't end there. Suppose the judge agrees that they were totally wrong, harmed you & the larger community, and agrees to issue a court order demanding that HTC release the source to everything included in their kernel. You can bet that before anyone at HTC fires up a text editor to go to work on preparing the source, Qualcomm and everyone else who furnished those proprietary binaries (or info under NDA necessary to implement them) will have injunctions of their own to stop HTC from releasing source they don't have the right to release. If you're lucky, you might be able to force HTC to do what they should have done in the first place: re-implement them as proper loadable kernel modules, rebuild the entire kernel so it works with them, and release THAT... and do the same for everything going forward. Realistically, the likelihood of this happening fewer than 5 years from the moment you walked into the law firm's office to kick off the case is depressingly slim.

      Oh... also... if the trial DOES drag on for years... don't let HTC's private investigator catch you using a different phone. Courts won't hear cases that are moot. If your claim that they've caused real harm to you rests upon being unable to build a kernel of your own for your phone (based on their infringing release), and they can demonstrate you haven't touched that phone in 3 years... well... let's just say it wouldn't be good. It wouldn't necessar

    48. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      Still sounds like a violation to me - if they end up in the same binary blob / running together in the same 'process' then GPL applies.

    49. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by WRX+SKy · · Score: 1

      I emailed the executive team at Sprint about this the day I got my HTC EVO - they had the audacity to reply back and claim that "it's not their fault, the hardware manufacturers decide what to pre-load". Bull. Why would HTC have any interest in loading Sprint NASCAR, Sprint TV, Sprint NFL, etc. etc. etc.

    50. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      if Google gets pissed in the same way Microsoft eventually did about pre-installed crapware, Google's fix could be pretty simple.

      Assuming that the apps are installed that way. What if the kernel has been coded to look for the applications? Take out that bit and the signed bootloader refuses to load the system.

    51. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Cankersore · · Score: 1

      Yeah I guess if following directions and typing in a terminal is hard for you, you really have no business trying to root it to begin with. Its actually rather simple to check on XDA to see is a root exploit is possible. But agreed, a few devices can't be rooted yet. But for sure, there is someone working on it.

    52. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by mlts · · Score: 1

      That is true, but it has become extremely difficult to find a new unlocked model in the US unless one wants to pay the $300-$500 fee that phone importers tack on.

    53. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a phone directly. Buy a phone from a manufacturer that does not add in bloatware.

      It's not that difficult, but most people aren't affected by or don't perceive the extras as bloatware. Most just toss them to the side and forget about it (and on a phone with sufficient memory, it doesn't really affect anything since they're not resident when not running)

    54. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by BagOBones · · Score: 1

      But google has already announced their will be no nexus 2 and that they will not produce any more phones directly.. The Nexus one was just to boot strap the android market with a feature packed phone... the current nexus one is now on life support.
      http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/10/07/22/1723225/Bloatware-Becoming-a-Problem-On-Android-Phones?from=rss&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Slashdot%2Fslashdot+(Slashdot)&utm_content=Google+Reader#
      But that goes the same for all android phones it seems.. with googles crazy release cycles few of the already released phones can be upgraded to the latest and gratest OS officially.. forcing users to root and get community versions..

      --
      EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    55. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by mcvos · · Score: 1

      There's only source. There's no article that explains what the hell it does.

    56. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by 1001011010110101 · · Score: 1

      Only what the original releaser stated.

    57. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by 1001011010110101 · · Score: 1

      There's a readme file on the release with a bit more of information.

    58. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I agree. The far more interesting - and relevant - battle I think is Nokia versus everyone else, since Nokia are the number one company in the phone market. Long term, we might well see Android the number one platform, though it could be that Nokia are still the number one company (since Android sales would be split across several manufacturers). Although then again, so far Android is only able to run on high end devices, so Nokia will still get a lot of Symbian sales from the mid-range, where you simply can't buy an Android phone (annoyingly - even older phones like the HTC Dream seem to be discontinued, where as Nokia have phones like the 5800, the X6, and even the dirt cheap 5230).

      Unfortunately the media just focus on Apple Apple Apple, as if a company with about 3% market share, that is only interested in selling expensive phones at the high end of the market, is the most relevant company.

    59. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Google is actually splitting the Android OS. Android 3 is going to be the Android version that is going to keep on blasting forward with higher hardware requirements. Android 2 on the other hand is going to keep on being maintained, but they are going to leave the hardware requirements where they are. In the short term, this doesn't mean much. In the long term, it means that once hardware gets cheaper (and it WILL get cheaper, fast), you are going to have "low end" smart phones running Android 2, and high end phones running Android 3.

      You might not see Android on the lowest level dumb phone, but we are about a year or two away from a cheap 2nd tier smartphone market that, at least in developed nations, is going to start eating into dumb phone market in a serious way. If you have to choose between a dumb phone or tossing in an extra $30 for a touch screen smart phone from the last generation, which would you pick?

    60. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      No, the point of what I was saying is that different things are going on. The market's much wider open. The Mac was always a niche product, because the market was defined by IBM and later Microsoft. The smart phone market is not defined by Nokia and RIM.

      The problem with Mac adoption was not that Apple made it Apple vs. Everybody, but that it had to be that way from the start. Either you fought it out in the increasingly low-margin MS-DOS/Windows market, or you came up with something different (Mac, Amiga) and tried to make it with that. A more accurate description would be Apple vs. IBM/Microsoft, not Apple vs. Everybody.

      On the contrary, my iPhone was a drop-in replacement for my old cell phone and my old PDA. This will probably continue: the heart of a smartphone isn't really the apps, and so they're a lot more fungible. Even if it were, the Android app store is very impressive nowadays, and they started later. The market is much more open and flexible.

      So, instead of Apple vs. IBM/Microsoft, it's Apple vs. Android vs. RIM vs. Nokia, along with other players that may enter (Microsoft is giving it another shot). The situation is much more similar to the environment the Apple II dominated. Unlike that environment, there's really no room for somebody like IBM to come around and redefine the market with massive expansion.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    61. Re:Can we say, Sprint NASCAR?!? by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      You have a strange definition of being on 'life support'. If it means being actively sold throughout most of the world and guaranteed with updates for the next year then I guess most phones in the world are on "life support".

  2. Buy better by tom229 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Guess that'll teach ya to buy GSM only and direct from the manufacturer.

    --
    If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    1. Re:Buy better by Miamicanes · · Score: 4, Informative

      > Guess that'll teach ya to buy GSM only and direct from the manufacturer.

      And have no 3G data service in a shockingly large part of America that isn't even particularly rural (the parts where you might have 3G service if you were to go stand on the roof of your house and orient the phone *exactly* the right way, but can forget about indoor service -- even next to a window. It's a particularly feast-or-famine problem with T-mobile. Due to their spectrum issues, there are quite a few places where the next step down from HSDPA/HSPA+ is GPRS (no EDGE).

      For the most part, if you have Sprint or Verizon, you're going to get at least ISDN-speed 1xRTT data just about anywhere in the country that's within a mile of the nearest paved road, and have decently reliable 3G EVDO service just about everywhere you're likely to care about unless you're a park ranger.

    2. Re:Buy better by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Similarly, AT&T has 3G coverage in a lot of areas where T-Mobile phones won't even work at all. (Their cross-roaming agreement seems to not be particularly effective.)

      Also, in nearly all areas, when not in an AT&T 3G area, you drop to EDGE and not bare GPRS.

      As to bloatware - this isn't a new problem. Windows Mobile does it too. RIM seems to be able to keep stricter control over the Blackberry, probably partly because they develop both the hardware and the OS and due to their tendency to be more "business oriented".

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    3. Re:Buy better by spleen_blender · · Score: 1

      I've had a G1 with T-Mobile for a year now in Houston, Tx. I've not once had a real issue with 3G. Hell, on a drive from Houston to Dallas or Austin I can tether the thing to my laptop and stream Grooveshark with barely missing a beat, and that is a bit of a rural area between here and there.

    4. Re:Buy better by mangaskahn · · Score: 1

      Or unless you live in WV. I have grandparents there and can't get service at all any farther than a few miles outside of Huntington.

      --
      Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect.--Linus Torvalds
    5. Re:Buy better by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that it is very easy to get rid of bloatware in Windows Mobile - a hard reset, and when it says something along the lines of "starting to install software in three seconds" do a soft reset.
      After the phone boots you've got a clean and pristine Windows Mobile.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:Buy better by eXFeLoN · · Score: 0

      Hell I live IN Little Rock and can't get 3G service for more than a few moments at a time if at all. I just turn off 3G. It's more a bother than it's worth. At least my company pays for the service (lol).

      --
      My other sig is a knife wound.
    7. Re:Buy better by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > Hell, on a drive from Houston to Dallas or Austin I can tether the thing to my laptop and stream Grooveshark
      > with barely missing a beat, and that is a bit of a rural area between here and there.

      T-Mobile, like Sprint, Verizon, AT&T, and everyone else, deploys coverage in rural areas first to highway corridors between their "real" coverage areas. It's a lot cheaper to throw a tower every couple of miles next to a major interstate along the "Texas Tee" than it is to keep building those towers further away from the road. I can drive from Fort Lauderdale to Naples along Alligator Alley and enjoy EVDO the entire way... but if I pulled off the road at one of the rest stops, got into a canoe, and went two or three miles north or south, I'd be lucky to have voice service that worked.

      You can see this pretty acutely if you take Amtrak from South Florida to Orlando, and compare coverage along the way to the coverage you have while driving along the Turnpike. On the Turnpike, you'll have 3G coverage from pretty much everyone -- Sprint, Verizon, T-Mobile, and AT&T -- all the way to Orlando. It might drop to 2.5G for a few miles ~50 miles southeast of I-4, but for the most part it's 3G all the way. Now take the train. You'll have coverage (on Sprint and Verizon, at least) all the way to Orlando, but it's going to be 2.5G 1xRTT for most of the trip between West Palm Beach and Winter Haven. The only time you're going to see 3G is when the train is literally stopped at a station at one of the few medium-sized towns along the way. The moment you're a mile out of town (or sooner), it's 2.5G time again.

    8. Re:Buy better by kindbud · · Score: 1

      For the most part, if you have Sprint or Verizon, you're going to get at least ISDN-speed 1xRTT data just about anywhere in the country that's within a mile of the nearest paved road, and have decently reliable 3G EVDO service just about everywhere you're likely to care about unless you're a park ranger.

      One of the best (Verizon) EVDO signals I have ever seen was while moored in Isthmus cove at Catalina Island, 26 miles off the coast of Los Angeles: Speedtest result

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    9. Re:Buy better by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Meh...where I live (Alaska), it doesn't matter if you have GSM or CDMA -- if you are outside of the three major (ahem) cities and a handful of outlying communities, the only mobile service you will find is satellite :)

      It's getting better, but the vast majority of the state has no cellular service of any kind whatsoever.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    10. Re:Buy better by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      but if I pulled off the road at one of the rest stops, got into a canoe, and went two or three miles north or south, I'd be lucky to have voice service that worked.

      Yes, well, reception inside an alligator can be problematic.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    11. Re:Buy better by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Ahh sailing and wireless, two topics I couldn't resist hitting reply to sir.

      I used to work for a wireless company years ago. One of the main reasons you get such a good signal over water is due to line of sight. On water there isn't any obstructions.

    12. Re:Buy better by bkissi01 · · Score: 1

      RIM seems to be able to keep stricter control over the Blackberry, probably partly because they develop both the hardware and the OS and due to their tendency to be more "business oriented".

      Not really. I just counted 22 junk icons on my Blackberry 9700. The BIS servers (carrier controlled I believe) that run the consumer devices are capable of pushing down a service book with new bloatware at any moment. On BES there is an IT policy to prevent the bloatware service books from being pushed down.

    13. Re:Buy better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. Capitalism will fix that for you anytime now.

    14. Re:Buy better by kindbud · · Score: 1

      There's a cell tower right there at Isthmus cove, a hundred yards from the moorings. I was not connecting to a tower across the channel. The reason I got such good performance was probably because I was the only 3G user in that cell.

      I have no idea if other carriers besides Verizon have cell towers on Catalina Island.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
  3. Shovelware by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Informative

    I always thought pre-installed crap was called "shovelware." As in, it's shoveled on there not for functionality's sake, but so some programmer can get a bonus.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Shovelware by frosty_tsm · · Score: 2, Informative

      I always thought pre-installed crap was called "shovelware." As in, it's shoveled on there not for functionality's sake, but so some programmer can get a bonus.

      Shovelware can also include bad software in general. They shovel it out the door, so to speak.

    2. Re:Shovelware by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      You're right, and the terminology difference matters to some people (like me). Bloatware would be the shopping list app I saw that was over 6MB on the Android Market. 6MB for a shopping list app huh? Try 600KB and I might bite.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Shovelware by gorzek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd call it "bundleware," which is relatively precise without being a loaded term.

      I always thought of "shovelware" as being what you get when you buy a 10-pack of games, and only two or three of them are good--the rest are garbage, just shovelware to fill out the package.

    4. Re:Shovelware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/programmer/manager/

    5. Re:Shovelware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always thought pre-installed crap was called "shovelware." As in, it's shoveled on there not for functionality's sake, but so some programmer can get a bonus.

      Mangers get bonuses, programmers just get another paycheck.

      (yeah, I'm a programmer)

    6. Re:Shovelware by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Programmer? Not even, it doesn't take a programmer to install software. It's the PHB types that ask for software to be installed, they get money from Norton, etc. for installing trial and demo software, with an expectation that enough users will buy it to pay for the preload.

    7. Re:Shovelware by sourcerror · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shovelware comes from ET for Atari 2600. The cartridges were manufactured in high number because Atari thought that the movie tie-in would translate to high sales, however the game was very poor so it sold poorly. They actually buried millions of cartridges in a landfill in Mexico. It's said to trigger the video game crisis of 1983.

    8. Re:Shovelware by ChronoFish · · Score: 1

      Since when do programmers get bonuses? Product Manager? - maybe. Developer of a free POS for a mobile device that will mostly be overlooked by the end-user? Not likely.

      -CF

    9. Re:Shovelware by FreonTrip · · Score: 1

      Or scrape it off an FTP server with a shovel and plop it onto a disc, as was the fashion of hundreds of "Over 3,000 levels for DOOM" CDs in the mid- to late '90s.

    10. Re:Shovelware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shovelware actually was coined when the CD-ROM was first becoming widespread. A lot of software companies tried to boost sales to people looking for "games on CD" on general principle by shoveling several unmodified older games onto the same CD.

      Bloatware is software that was useful but has become bloated with excessive features and is now unwieldy to use (Microsoft Word was the epitome of this).

      I don't know that there has ever been a satisfactory term for this. Birthmarkware? Zitware? Floormatware? Peelware? Rindware?

    11. Re:Shovelware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'd call it "bundleware," which is relatively precise without being a loaded term.

      It's a pre-loaded term.

    12. Re:Shovelware by gorzek · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're right. I didn't realize that was the origin of the term "shovelware." Makes sense, though. ET's infamy lives on in the lexicon.

  4. I'm Confused... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought android was the "Open" one...

    1. Re:I'm Confused... by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course it's "open," you just have to jailbreak it first!

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:I'm Confused... by cacba · · Score: 2, Funny

      Im giving away free chocolate bars!

      Did I mention they are at the bottom of the ocean?

    3. Re:I'm Confused... by AndrewNeo · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is something a lot of people get confused. ("If it's open, why do you have to root it?")

      What it is, is the AOSP (Android Open Source Project) is completely open. The source code to the Android tree is right here. You can do whatever you want with your own build of Android, nobody is stopping you. When it comes to phones, this is where the "openness" ends, other than the manufacturers having to contribute changes back to the source (which they do). However, the build of Android you buy on your phone certainly does not have to be open. The telcos usually want the bootloaders locked so you can't run an "unapproved" build of Android, and the provided builds of Android may include this crap, or even go as far as AT&T does and disable loading applications from anywhere but the Marketplace.

      If you want to avoid the sort of problem like this shovelware/bloatware, make sure to get a phone running stock Android, like the Droid or the Nexus One (for example) that hasn't had the OS itself modified by the manufacturer (like with HTC Sense or Motoblur) or by the carrier (like with the EVO).

    4. Re:I'm Confused... by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's open, just not to you. But doesn't feel so much better to be fucked over by a corporation that uses Open Source software ?

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    5. Re:I'm Confused... by nine-times · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Funniest thing is that people have said that to me, and they weren't joking. Part of the reason I got an HTC Incredible is that everyone kept talking about how open Android phones are. Then I was like, "Ok, now how do I get WiFi tethering on this bad-boy?"

      The response was, "Oh, it's easy. You just have to root it."

      "So you're saying I have to hack it. Same way I can do whatever I want with my iPhone, but I have to hack it first."

      "No, no. It's totally different. Android is open."

      "But you have to hack it in order to be able to do what you want?"

      "Yes."

      *sigh* "Ok, so how do I root an Incredible?"

      "Oh, you can't. Someone will probably figure it out sooner or later, but for now you're just stuck with what you have."

      "But I could jailbreak an iPhone now and do whatever I want with it. People already figured it out."

      "Yeah, I guess."

      "How is this more open again?"

      "Because with Android, you can do whatever you want! It's Linux, after all."

    6. Re:I'm Confused... by __aaaaxm1522 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If I could mod this up 10000x, I would.

      I love me some open Linux-y goodness, but Android isn't open. Not in the same way the Ubuntu or a desktop OS is. That's not Google's fault, it's the fault of the phone manufacturers. But the end result is the same - if you want full control over your "open" Android phone, you have to circumvent the restrictions the manufacturer has placed on it - *just* like you have to with an iPhone.

      So, given that little tidbit, I'd rather get an iPhone. At least Apple has an idea of how to design quality user interfaces. Android suffers from Linux-UI-itis.

      (disclaimer: I own both a Nexus One and an iPhone 3GS ... and develop software for both of them. I bought the Nexus One because it was more "open" ... and then discovered that it really wasn't)

    7. Re:I'm Confused... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      It is. You can download and compile the source as much as you want. It's all right there. Google has made it 100% open.

      Of course, if you want a truly open phone, that you can have root access to and that you can unlock the bootloader on (i.e. to flash your own ROMs) you'll either need to use a procedure that's not authorized by the manufacturer, or you'll need to get a Google Developer Phone (i.e. Nexus One). Or find a manufacturer that supports truly open hardware (good luck with that).

      Unless you use something like the GPL-v3, forcing manufacturers to be open isn't possibly. And if you tried the GPL-v3 approach, not a single manufacturer would have adopted Android. It's completely incompatible with their business model of carrier-subsidized handsets and carrier-lock-in.

      Unfortunately, nobody in the market other than a few hundred thousand geeks really wanted the openness of the Nexus One, as a result it's been removed from public sales in the US effective yesterday, and will only be offered for sale to registered Android developers in the future (it's still on the market through retail outlets and phone company partnerships in Europe, Korea and possibly other places though).

      People voted with their dollars - they *like* the crapware because it subsidizes their el-cheapo subsidized handsets. If they were willing to pay the actual cost of the hardware, they wouldn't have to see bloatware/crapware flooding the damn phones and wouldn't be beholden to the shitty carriers. But no, they are a bunch of whiny bitches who won't pay and they killed the market for open hardware.

      Luckily, registering as an Android developer just means paying an extra $25 bucks, which shouldn't stop most of the Slashdot geek crowd. And rooting and bootloader-unlocking most of the Samsung, Motorola and HTC Android phones is pretty easy for anybody who's tech-saavy enough to be flashing their own ROMs in the first place.

    8. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will never get modded up as you deserve. I think this has been the clearest description of the hypocritical thinking Android fans (notice didn't say fanbois...awful term) have vs. iPhone.

      The only thing I can possibly see in the current market that Android has over the iPhone is you can install any app you want..now, I'm not so sure based on all the locking down carriers are doing.

    9. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I was like, "Ok, now how do I get WiFi tethering on this bad-boy?"

      The response was, "Oh, it's easy. You just have to root it."

      "So you're saying I have to hack it. Same way I can do whatever I want with my iPhone, but I have to hack it first."

      Actually, Easytether and PDANet are free apps for all android phones that allow tethering without rooting.

      Score one for openness ;)

    10. Re:I'm Confused... by ballwall · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While I agree for the most part, the critical exception is that [most] of the android phones don't have to use the single all-powerful app store, you can still install apps from anywhere. (There are exceptions to even this, though)

    11. Re:I'm Confused... by jimrthy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How did the GPL miss this sort of thing?

    12. Re:I'm Confused... by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Palm is the real open platform then. No rooting really required. You have to turn developer mode on initially, but there's no possible bricking of the phone or any of that... and with the developer package and that mode on, you're root. Anyone can do it. And as far as I know, Palm is not trying to change that.

    13. Re:I'm Confused... by arover · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, as I'm not very familiar with iPhone restrictions, but as I understand it your average Android-based phone can provide more openness out of the box in terms of how much functionality a given app may have, as well as allowing the installation of unsigned apps. Would something like Swype (as in a completely new keyboard application, overriding the stock kb) be allowed on the iPhone?

      Sure, you may not be able to tether on the stock phone, but the OS definitely provides a more 'loose' environment to work with compared to that of Apple.

    14. Re:I'm Confused... by AndrewNeo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think GPLv3 solved it, but, Android is under the Apache license, not GPL.

    15. Re:I'm Confused... by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

      The important different is that the replacement ROMs can be constructed 99.999% from source.

    16. Re:I'm Confused... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      talking about how open Android phones are

      They're confused. Some android phones are open, some are not.

    17. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      (disclaimer: I own both a Nexus One and an iPhone 3GS ... and develop software for both of them. I bought the Nexus One because it was more "open" ... and then discovered that it really wasn't)

      BZZT wrong, Android is more "open" in one very important way:

      I can sign and distribute an application for Android myself, with no restrictions. With iPhone, if I want to sign and distribute an application to a large number of people, the ONLY WAY TO DO IT is through that shithole called the Apple App Store.

    18. Re:I'm Confused... by bnenning · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I bought the Nexus One because it was more "open" ... and then discovered that it really wasn't

      How is it not? You can develop and distribute apps without begging for permission, and Google specifically makes it easy to unlock the N1's bootloader (and void your warranty, yes), while Apple considers you to be a criminal if you jailbreak.

      Yes, the carriers are being as obnoxious and user-hostile as always. Which means if you want a phone that's actually open you have to do a bit of research beforehand. But at least you have that choice, unlike with the iPhone.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    19. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, it is, just don't get one branded by the major telephone companies. It's open enough that they can close it. I have a Nexus 1 straight from google and have none of the issues described in this article. It was also ridiculously easy to root and install a custom kernel on (cyanogen mod).

      Android really is a great platform...just, you know, the major telecoms suck ass. But we already knew that, right?

    20. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Install EASY TETHER are you that lazy?

    21. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds like you bought it without even the slightest bit of research and then wanted to blame everyone else for it. I have an incredible as well, and ten minutes of research told me about the issues involved with it.

      "But I could jailbreak an iPhone now and do whatever I want with it. People already figured it out."

      I can foresee where your complaining would be due to lack of research if you had gone the iphone direction. Christ dude, read up on shit before you buy.

    22. Re:I'm Confused... by chaboud · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a true problem, but it's a good problem to be able to have.

      If you make a codebase truly open for others to use and distribute as they see fit, they may decide to do stupid things to that software and hamstring it for users. That they have the option of doing this is, if you think about it, kind of cool. Handcuffs of the sort that Microsoft is putting on Windows Phone 7 (you must not skin, etc) might seem good for users at first glance, but they might also reduce attractiveness of the platform, adoption, and innovation. For a fledgling platform like Android, this could be a dealbreaker.

      Over time, we've seen carriers slowly lose their stranglehold over many facets of your phone, first with little installable applications, now moving onto more open devices like the Nexus One (RIP). If you try and move them more suddenly, like the OpenMoko, you may find the resistance to change too great to overcome. Slow erosion towards the cellular provider becoming more and more just the pipe by which we operate (remember when AOL gave way to ISPs?) is an effective, if somewhat annoying, approach.

      Android is more open than iOS in that the market pressures for application openness and full I-can-install-whatever-build-of-the-OS-I-want openness have the chance of being served by a manufacturer that chooses to respond to these market pressures. With the vertically integrated Apple approach to iOS, we have to hope that our little nugget of market pressure to have more open platforms can sway the monolithic controller of the platform. With Android, we merely have to hope that one manufacturer among many looks for a defining competitive advantage, one that can be had with minimal software development effort (i.e. just build and install stock android).

      I'll leave it to the peanut gallery to decide whether a move by Apple or one manufacturer among many is more likely.

    23. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually prefer the nexus 1 interface to my ipod touch's interface. Interesting that you like the iphone more. I personally like having much more fine-grained system control with the nexus 1, including detailed battery use information to get rid of apps that suck away the phone's juice. Have you installed anything other than the stock kernel? Cyanogen Mod is really nice, and opens up the system more to the user without losing the user experience that the stock android system gives you. AND if you really wanted to, you could roll your own android distribution LEGALLY, which you definitely can't do with the iphone. I would say that counts as being more open.

      Rooting a nexus 1 is extremely simple. I think it took me all of 10 minutes, 9 of these minutes were spent googling for instructions.

      One thing I will agree with, though, is that all of the custom interfaces from HTC, Verizon, etc fucking suck. Googles interface is pretty damn good in my opinion.

    24. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to be a stickler here, but Android IS inherently open. However, carriers can lock down particular devices.
      The HTC incredible is not open, the Nexus One IS open (if you buy the unlocked version for full price, but at least that's an option).

      The carriers provide you with a subsidy in the hope you will put up with all their crapware.

    25. Re:I'm Confused... by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      What you fail to mention is that a large portion of the things people jailbreak an iPhone to be able to do are available on a non-rooted Android phone.

    26. Re:I'm Confused... by Miamicanes · · Score: 2, Informative

      > You will never get modded up as you deserve. I think this has been the clearest description of the hypocritical
      > thinking Android fans (notice didn't say fanbois...awful term) have vs. iPhone.

      The difference is, we openly and routinely excoriate HTC, Motorola, and the others, bitch about their GPL violations to anyone who'll listen, and compare them to Satan's lovechild for even the smallest transgression. iPhone fans rationalize and justify Apple's behavior, and act like it's somehow shameful to demand full control of your phone.

      Android owners bitch about the difficulty of building an Android distro from scratch without the cooperation of the phone's maker, usuall caused by things like HTC shitting monolithic binary kernel blobs on the curb, sniffing them a few times, and walking away satisfied instead of building their proprietary binary kernel drivers as loadable kernel modules the way they're REQUIRED to under the GPL (so new kernels can be built around them without losing the functionality provided by the .ko modules themselves).

      It's not hard to imagine a few thousand angry Android users staging a protest in the Googleplex parking lot over some perceived betrayal of Android's open ideals. Try to imagine even a few dozen iPhone owners picketing on the sidewalk in front of Apple if AT&T somehow managed to push out an update that revoked root and forcibly reflashed a million jailbroken iPhones. It's almost inconceivable. Even if there were a few dozen angry iPhone owners, they'd be drowned out by the ocean of Normal Users(tm) bleating about how they shouldn't have jailbroken their iPhones in the first place, because jailbroken iPhones makes Steve Jobs sad.

    27. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So go download or program a tether app and stop lying on slashdot.

    28. Re:I'm Confused... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Amen... Android on the phone you buy is as open as IOS4..

      the ONLY open android phone made was the one sold by google. all the rest are simply red headed ginger step children that secretly hate you.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    29. Re:I'm Confused... by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Except for those of us that have non "blessed" android devices that dont have the store. trying to install the free store apps is a major pain in the arse searching bittorrent sites to get apk files that should be openly available...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    30. Re:I'm Confused... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Except for that silly thing of signing the Rom file so it will install in the phone.... even getting 99.9999987% is worthless if you cant install it on the phone.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    31. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not Google's fault

      I disagree:

      1. In Froyo API changed, which breaks all Task Killers. As far as I know there is no way to kill an application completely on Froyo. Services will keep restarting automatically.
      2. Froyo has nice feature to re-download all applications after re-flashing ROM. Again, no way to disable it easily.
      3. Android (from the beginning) was killing applications in low-memory situations. No way to configure which apps to kill or disable this feature.
      4. Eclair merges contacts almost randomly. No way to disable.

      Maybe android is open source, but it's not open, because you cant configure even most basic options IMHO.

    32. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This definitely needs to be modded up. Infact, if you really wanted to (and someone should) there is nothing stopping you from building a completely open android phone, much like openmoko. You could design a phone using open-source hardware from the ground up, run android, and none of this would be an issue. Android *is* open source. The phone it's installed on is not. The nexus one is *designed* to be rooted and used as a development phone. They make is SO easy to do. I installed a custom build of android (cyanogen mod) within an hour of getting my nexus one in the mail from google. No fancy trickery or tom foolery, just rebooted to the loader, entered a command, and it was rooted. I think in the realm of openness in phones it goes:

      OpenMoko > Nokia N900 > Nexus one > other android phones > blackberry > ipod.

      Android devices are not the MOST open, but they're more open than most, and more pervasive than the N900 and OpenMoko.

    33. Re:I'm Confused... by mchappee · · Score: 4, Informative

      >You can develop and distribute apps without begging for permission

      The Apple app store has a 96% approval rate and 98% of those are available within a week. No begging required. And for that you get distribution, exposure, hosting and the lion's share of the money.

      > while Apple considers you to be a criminal if you jailbreak

      From the iOS Jailbreak Wiki: "Jailbreaking, according to Apple, voids Apple's warranty on the device, although this is quickly remedied by restoring the device in iTunes." Can you please site your references?

      Haters gotta hate, I guess.
      MC

      --
      /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
    34. Re:I'm Confused... by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      Also, the Linux kernel is under GPLv2, not v3.
      Changing the license may or may not be possible, but currently there seem to be no plans to push for a change to GPLv3.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    35. Re:I'm Confused... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      The only major manufacturer that allows you to install anything you want on your phone, as far as I know, is Nokia, with the N900. Which is a true Linux, not an Android.

      So if you want a manufacturer-supported way of doing whatever you want on your open phone, the N900 is the only choice.

    36. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep scanning the horizon for a $100 android world phone clone ...and hope it doesn't come with the green wall pre-installed

      -- anonymously confused

    37. Re:I'm Confused... by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

      I agree fully that Android as it's being distributed isn't as open as it ought to be. However, it's still more open than iPhone in at least one non-trivial way:

      http://android.git.kernel.org/

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    38. Re:I'm Confused... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      How is it not? You can develop and distribute apps without begging for permission,

      And you can develop apps for your iPhone for a fairly small cash outlay. And distribute it to 99 people without going through the app store. Or just distribute the source and let them build it themselves. Sheesh, I mean you claim the Android is open, but the iPhone either requires Apple's approval or to make it open source.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    39. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's almost like they lubed it up before shoving it in there!

    40. Re:I'm Confused... by juancnuno · · Score: 1

      If you want to avoid the sort of problem like this shovelware/bloatware, make sure to get a phone running stock Android, like the Droid or the Nexus One (for example) that hasn't had the OS itself modified by the manufacturer (like with HTC Sense or Motoblur) or by the carrier (like with the EVO).

      It'd be nice if Google still sold them. :/

    41. Re:I'm Confused... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      That's not Google's fault, it's the fault of the phone manufacturers.

      Google set the licensing parameters.

      it is their fault entirely.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    42. Re:I'm Confused... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Great, so if I'm a kernel programmer who doesn't actually want to install his altered kernel on a phone, then I'm golden.

      I'm not sure I'd agree to call that "non-trivial".

    43. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh, I find my N1 to be tremendously open. I can install any app, whether or not it comes from the app store, it does tethering, both cabled and wifi without any hacks or extra software (It's included in firmware 2.2) and I have a good deal of access to the system files and running processes. I can certainly see how some Android phones are locked down (I had a Motorola before this and it had a lot of extra junk I never used.) but the Nexus one is as open as smartphones get.

    44. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know the technical/legal details between the license differences of the AOSP project itself, and their use of the Linux kernel, but I would assume the manufacturers are still required (and do) post back their source changes to the kernel.

    45. Re:I'm Confused... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Many phones do not need that.

    46. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Or you could just get a Palm Pre"

      "Oh, what's involved with making that my own?"

      "upupdowndownleftrightleftrightbastart"

      "My god, that's the easiest one yet! It's as though they want you to do that!"

    47. Re:I'm Confused... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Nope, my Droid has an unlocked bootloader and is easy to root. I can still tether over usb without doing any of that, or installing apps not blessed by his jobedness.

    48. Re:I'm Confused... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Ginny Weasley hates me?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    49. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      > while Apple considers you to be a criminal if you jailbreak

      From the iOS Jailbreak Wiki: "Jailbreaking, according to Apple, voids Apple's warranty on the device, although this is quickly remedied by restoring the device in iTunes." Can you please site your references?

      Apple Says iPhone Jailbreaking is Illegal
      PDF

      Now whether it actually is or not, is a completely different question.

    50. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends what you want to make.

      I've submitted 2 apps. Of them 1 never made it past approval and the other was stuck in the process for weeks, going back and forth to make it "acceptable".

      Yes, mirror apps tend to get approved. Apps that do cooler stuff (say, grooveshark) are approved at lower rate - or are not feasable in the first place to build given the API constraints.

    51. Re:I'm Confused... by dissy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I love me some open Linux-y goodness, but Android isn't open.

      The problem is, and you just did it too, that people use the word 'Android' to refer to two totally separate and different things.

      Android is the OS. It is open. You probably will never get to use it however so that point is moot. Unless you happen to build hardware capable of running Android, then never mind :P But I will assume for now you do not build cell phone hardware.
      (PS, you don't have to root it, the default build has no root password set, just login as root and hit enter for the password.)

      Now, what most people do is also say Android is the phone itself, which is just not true.
      The phones are in no way open. The phones need rooted. The phones can't run any OS you choose.

      None of those very valid complaints however make the phone 'Android'

    52. Re:I'm Confused... by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      Funniest thing is that people have said that to me, and they weren't joking. Part of the reason I got an HTC Incredible is that everyone kept talking about how open Android phones are. Then I was like, "Ok, now how do I get WiFi tethering on this bad-boy?"

      You need to stop talking to stupid people and start talking to people who know what they are doing. EasyTether ($9.99) and EasyTether Lite (free but doesn't do all protocols) will do it for you without needing to root the phone.

    53. Re:I'm Confused... by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      That's not Google's fault, it's the fault of the phone manufacturers

      More likely the fault of the wireless carriers... they don't want people doing WiFi tether without getting their piece of the pie (30% surcharge in the case of the $99 everything plan on Sprint!!!)

    54. Re:I'm Confused... by happydan · · Score: 1

      You could actually do some research and buy one that has been rooted. Cyanogenmod supports something like six different phones. Android *is* open compared to most other smartphone platforms. I have a G1 that's running CM5 (Android 2.1) built from the open source code Google put out. I don't see that ever happening on Apple phone hardware? Even before I rooted my phone, I could install non-market apps easily. It's not Android that's closed. Blame the hardware manufacturers and networks like AT&T (who disabled non-market app install on their Android phones).

    55. Re:I'm Confused... by tknd · · Score: 1

      The Apple app store has a 96% approval rate and 98% of those are available within a week.

      So there's a 4% rejection rate. Where as on android there is no rejection rate because you can distribute it yourself. Let's not even get into the type of stuff that Apple has explicitly said will never be approved, therefore it is useless for you to even try (Flash, emulators, tethering).

      Haters gotta hate, I guess.

      This isn't about hate. This is about putting up with unnecessary bs that Apple created to maintain control.

      And to bring this thread back on topic, you could always tether with android, you just needed to install an app that enabled tethering. On an Android 1.6 phone for example you could get pdanet and tether your phone for free. There were some limitations by the pdanet dev (no https) but that didn't prevent you from rolling your own and installing it on your device.

      On 2.2 tethering is built-in unless your carrier doesn't want you to.

      Rooting is only necessary if you want to change the ROM or tamper with the system. But on a device like a Nexus One this is largely pointless because Google will provide you with the latest production ready image. The ROMs out do add small tweaks in functionality but nothing "must have" that I've seen.

      Most of the customization already comes from installing apps either through the market or outside of the market. Here's a list of things I've been able to do since I've had my Nexus One without root: install Wii Controller to enable using a Wiimote over bluetooth with the N1, emulators, installing multiple software keyboards, installing a different app launcher (LauncherPro).

      So I don't know how this got to comparing android root to iphone jailbreak. They're totally different. Android root = ROMs. iphone jailbreak = yay, now you can install any apps regardless of what Steve Jobs says.

    56. Re:I'm Confused... by Raul+Acevedo · · Score: 1

      You are confused, this has nothing to do with Android. Carriers have been installing bloatware on phones for years, regardless of OS. Apple fortunately has managed to spare the iPhone. Calling this an "Android" problem is pure FUD.

      --
      In a real emergency, we would have all fled in terror, and you would not have been notified.
    57. Re:I'm Confused... by jittles · · Score: 1

      if you want full control over your "open" Android phone, you have to circumvent the restrictions the manufacturer has placed on it - *just* like you have to with an iPhone.

      The big difference is that every time HTC or Motorola comes out with a new OS update for your phone, they have to release the source. So now you can update the OS on your phone without having to jailbreak/root again.

      I was annoyed to death having to do this release after buggy release of 2.0 and 3.0s. You know, when Apple was pushing out a new update every few weeks.

      Even if they don't make future updates to your phone you have everything you need to roll your own update to your phone.

    58. Re:I'm Confused... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So you agree then that you must get permission and even worse 4% of folks don't.

    59. Re:I'm Confused... by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Sure, you have a 96% approval rate overall. And for small, uninteresting applications (i.e. most of them), the approval rate is probably pretty close to that average.

      But for more useful stuff that *might* compete with something Apple or AT&T offer for a fee, one can guess that the approval rate drops precipitously.

      No, I don't have more than anecdotal data; think stuff like web browsers or tethering apps.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    60. Re:I'm Confused... by MogNuts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's your opinion. I think iOS has a vastly *inferior* UI. I think the fact that Apple is missing a "back" button and you can't press and hold something to bring up a menu makes Android 100% superior. A different sized back button in a different font and location everytime. Yes, that's wonderful for quick navigation Apple!

      And another great Apple UI invention:
      How many actually use your smartphone? I get texts, e-mails, IM's, etc. I have a 3GS. I get bombarded 24x7 with alerts that interrupt me and won't go away until I touch a button. People hate pop-ups, but when iOS gives them, they "love their Apple experience." Anyway, this gets real annoying for someone who actually uses their phone and gets more than 1 IM, e-mail, etc., and doesn't spend their day jerking off to playing a piano on his Iphone. Meanwhile, Android has a nice little non-intrusive alert. Android even elegantly sorts a drop-down box if you would like to see items at a glance. And it doesn't interrupt what I'm doing.

      And don't get me started on multitasking. IOS has limited multitasking and the programmer has to enable it. This reminds me of back in the day when shit-brained Apple still had cooperative multi-tasking while the entire world was on true pre-emptive multitasking. Apple left it to the coders to do multitasking. Look at how well that worked out back then. Most coders are not that good, and as we see from the App Store (don't get me started on that one--95% are a buggy featureless mess), most of those developers are downright awful. Presently, thousands of apps now handle multitasking like garbage. And history repeats itself.

      I only got the 3GS because I wanted a change at the time. I used Blackberries for years (which I absolutely loved; the Bold 9700 is quite possible the best phone in existence for people who actually use their phone, and don't play games or need 10,000 fart/flashlight apps), but I just felt like eating chicken instead of steak. I regret ever being duped by the hype ("but-but-Apple gives the best experience") and believing that Apple actually made a good product with a good UI.

      For the rest of us, who actually want a superior product, stick with RIM and Android.

    61. Re:I'm Confused... by MogNuts · · Score: 1

      You can't fix stupid.

      Tethering apps (with NO rooting):

      Poster below mentions $10 tether app
      PDANet, $30 or free

      Try again troll.

    62. Re:I'm Confused... by MogNuts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Judging from your low UID you should know better than that.

      1) Approval--unless for no reason Apple pulls your app out of the blue. There goes your investment. Or declines it for any other numerous reasons.

      2) You get distribution, exposure, hosting and a lion's share of the money on Android Marketplace. Fail.

      3) I shouldn't have to Jailbreak a device to get retardedly simple functionality. That limit that Apple puts up shouldn't even be there in the first place. Every other smartphone manufacturer has let you install anything u want. This entire argument wouldn't even exist if not for Apple creating it. Apple is single-handedly ruining the entire smartphone future.

      Sorry Apple, tethering (and not AT&T's extra fee per month forever) and flash capability does matter. Short of reading online journal's, newspaper, etc, alot of web functionality comes from flash. The entire web won't change for you Apple, no matter how trendy now they're trying to make HTML5. And I don't care that NBC.com's online videos compete with Apple's ITunes. I don't care that Netflix streaming competes. These things give me a valuable service and I need flash to do it.

    63. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The android store has a 100% approval rate and 100% of those are available immediately. Plus you can offer your app for free if you wish. Oh yes, and if you sell an app for 1$ and someone buys it, you actually receive 1$ and not 0.60$.

    64. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >The Apple app store has a 96% approval rate and 98% of those are available within a week. No begging required. And for that you get distribution, exposure, hosting and the lion's share of the money.

      Are you counting all the apps people don't bother to submit because they will get automatically denied? Like a home replacement app? Widgets that mimick one? How about a custom keyboard? How about a usb tether app(no root required!)? How about Wifi tether(ok you need root for this one unless you have the Nexus One)?

      My point: While people on Android have about 4 great keyboards to choose from, like the stock one, Swype, SwiftKey, BlindType, etc, iPhone developers don't even start thinking about it. Emulators for GBA? Don't even think about it. The list goes on and on...

    65. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Android Market rejection rate may be zero, but it means that there's even more crap on there than in the Apple Store (which is also loaded with tons of crap). There's not even an attempt to weed out malicious or buggy apps, forcing the 'community' to root out the malware and spam. I even saw somebody selling SNES rom packs -- I'm pro-emulation and have a ton of roms, but selling them is just wrong.

      Yes, things are more open than on the iPhone, but 'open' doesn't always mean 'better', especially for the average phone user.

    66. Re:I'm Confused... by SilentMobius · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Android 2.2 has tethering built in so, you can:

      1) wait for 2.2
      2) buy "Pdanet" from the market
      3) Root your device and void your warranty
      4) Write an app yourself

      On the iphone you can

      1) Jailbreak your phone remembering apple claims this is illegal

      _That_ is why android is more open.

      Now _within_ the Andoid ecosystem there are more and less open phones (it's worse for you poor sods in the US, but that because telco's pay their way out of needed regulation)
      If you got a Nexus1 then rooting is available with google supported tools (you still void your software warranty though) if you get HTC branded phone it's harder and Moto are really pissy about that sort of thing.

      A friend of mine said it best:
      "The iPhone encourages you to be a consumer
      Android encourages you to be a creator"

      --
      Loop, twist and loop again.
    67. Re:I'm Confused... by bonkedproducer · · Score: 4, Informative
      • "Apple Claims Jailbreaking will Destroy Cell Towers" - ZDNet
      • "Apple: Jailbreaking encourages cell tower terrorism, 'catastrophic results'" - Engadget
      • "Apple also claimed that jailbreaking would pave the way for hackers to alter the Exclusive Chip Identification number that identified the phone to the cell tower, which could enable calls to be made anonymously. Apple said “this would be desirable to drug dealers.”"Wired - Threat Level

      Do I need to continue? Or is the reality distortion field still in effect?

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    68. Re:I'm Confused... by bonkedproducer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Blame the app maker, nothing stops you from posting your APKs everywhere.

      --
      Clothes make the man. Naked people have little or no influence in society - M. Twain
    69. Re:I'm Confused... by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Um... then don't buy an Incredible. If you buy an Android phone, you might have to spend a few seconds thinking about your purchase. Some Android phones are good, some are bad. Some have it so that rooting is easy and built in, some have it so it is very hard or not yet possible. Some have massive screens, some are tiny and portable. Some are on good carriers, some are on shit carriers. Seriously, if this is too much for you, just buy an iPhone. It is one brand and they offer a one phone-fits-all policy. Watch TV and the marketing blitz will inform you when you need to upgrade to their next gen.

      If on the other hand you want a little flexibility and don't want to be locked into Apple's walled suburb model now and in the future, buy an Android phone. Fine one that fits you. They are all different. You might need to spend a few moments doing some minimal thinking and research.

      Different folks, different strokes.

    70. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that, folks, is why FREE SOFTWARE is better than "open source"... but by all means continue to bitch, whine, moan and complain about being "forced" to give back.

    71. Re:I'm Confused... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Android is open. A specific Android-based phone might not be.

      In a similar vein, Linux is open, but a specific Linux-based device (e.g. TiVo) might not be.

    72. Re:I'm Confused... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Um... then don't buy an Incredible.

      All the Android phones need to be hacked, though. Even the Nexus One, which I've heard is easy to hack, requires you to hack it to get full root access. If you have to hack the phone to make it open, then it's really no better than the iPhone. You can hack the iPhone too.

    73. Re:I'm Confused... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Supports both USB Tether and Bluetooth DUN.

      No WiFi, no deal.

    74. Re:I'm Confused... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Does EasyTether support WiFi? Because what I need is specifically to have my phone work as a mobile wireless access point. To my understanding, you can get USB or Bluetooth tethering working without hacking the phone, but not WiFi tethering.

      But really that's a side issue anyhow. The point is, I can't do with it as I please. If I buy the iPhone, I'm able to do whatever is within the confines of what Apple/AT&T will allow; if I buy the Incredible, I'm allowed to do whatever is within the confines of what HTC/Verizon will allow. In either case, I can hack the phone and get more functionality.

      There may be some practical differences in what Apple/AT&T allow vs what HTC/Verizon will allow, but either way I'm on someone's leash.

    75. Re:I'm Confused... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Which ones require absolutely no hacking to root it and install an alternate image? It's my understanding that even the Nexus One wasn't simply "open".

    76. Re:I'm Confused... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Android is open. A specific Android-based phone might not be.

      In a similar vein, Linux is open, but a specific Linux-based device (e.g. TiVo) might not be.

      Well not quite, though, and therein lies the problem. Android is open, but none of the Android phones are. Some are easier to hack than others, but unless you want to hack your phone, you're stuck with whatever Android image was installed by your phone's manufacturer.

      With Linux, on the other hand, I can buy pretty much any computer I want and install any distribution I want on it. By default. No trickery required.

      If we're going to start considering devices to be "open" because you theoretically can hack them, then the iPhone is open too.

    77. Re:I'm Confused... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Well not quite, though, and therein lies the problem. Android is open, but none of the Android phones are. Some are easier to hack than others, but unless you want to hack your phone, you're stuck with whatever Android image was installed by your phone's manufacturer.

      I would argue that if it is something that is officially documented by the manufacturer, it's not a hack nor "trickery". Given that the procedure to root N1 is thus documented, I consider it to be an open phone. I cannot speak for other Android devices.

      If we're going to start considering devices to be "open" because you theoretically can hack them, then the iPhone is open too.

      iPhone is still the worst of the bunch, because so far only Apple has claimed that they consider jailbreaking their phones to be a DMCA violation.

    78. Re:I'm Confused... by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Then I was like, "Ok, now how do I get WiFi tethering on this bad-boy?"

      And they were like "simple - just install Android 2.2" and I was all about "thanks" and stuff.

      Oh, and I pooped.

    79. Re:I'm Confused... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You can develop and distribute apps without begging for permission

      The Apple app store has a 96% approval rate and 98% of those are available within a week. No begging required. And for that you get distribution, exposure, hosting and the lion's share of the money.

      That is all just a matter of perspective. Dig down a little and you'll have the Vuvuzela app, which even allows you to pick different coloured Vuvzelas to piss people off. However so far every attempt at a Titty-Of-The-Day app has suffered by the 0% approval rate.

      I know which of the two I would much rather have with me on a lonely night.

      Saying the app store has a high approval rate for it's crap apps is like saying that the world could do without Apple because we already have Microsoft.

    80. Re:I'm Confused... by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      Does EasyTether support WiFi?

      I assume so, but I've never needed to try. I'll try tonight.

    81. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the key difference is that on Android, you can install any app you want from anywhere, not just through the stupid store. Combine this with free, open source developer tools and you have a very different environment than iPhone, you cannot compare them in the slightest.

    82. Re:I'm Confused... by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, this is utterly ridiculous - you claim the N1 is not more "open" than the iPhone? When the entire kernel and 95% of userspace is open source (as in, Here Is The Source, Check it Out with Git), installing non-approved apps involves merely checking a box, rooting the device is barely more difficult than that, and even if you stick to approved apps Google exerts almost no restrictions on what you can develop (and yes, tethering apps are included, without root, in contradiction to your assertion). When there are developers out there like Cyanogen checking out the source themselves and recompiling it into ROMs you can flash onto the device with the full blessing and approval of Google? The N1 is not more open than an iPhone?

      Please, make whatever arguments you like about the quality of Android and iPhone ecosystems, but if you care at all about what "open" means in the software world, do not pretend that there is no difference between Android and the iPhone on this point. It may not be very meaningful or useful to you in particular (though as a software developer developer it should be), but some of us care about it a lot.

    83. Re:I'm Confused... by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      At least one can still service their iPhone after they jailbreak it. One restore, and it's as good as gold! Unlocking the bootloader on the Nexus One voids its warranty FOR GOOD because they can't be re-locked (at least from what I've been reading).

    84. Re:I'm Confused... by victorhooi · · Score: 1

      heya,

      Lol, sorry mate, I'm going to have to politely disagree with most of your points.

      I have a Nexus One, and I've had Froyo for some time - ever since the leaked pre-release copy.

      1. Those who use a task-killer on Android show a serious lack of understanding of how the OS actually works. Please do some reading before citing ignorant examples like this:

      http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=6426198 (links to below article)
      http://geekfor.me/faq/you-shouldnt-be-using-a-task-killer-with-android/
      http://androidspin.com/2010/05/25/why-you-dont-need-a-task-killer-app-with-android/

      2. Yes, you can disable this feature. It's under Settings, Privacy, Automatic restore (Yes/No).

      3. Once again, please do some reading before citing ignorant examples like this. See the above link on how Android handles background processed.

      4. I don't know about random. However, you can unmerge Contacts quite easily - just hit the menu button on an open contact, and hit "Split". To be honest, I've found this feature quite useful in certain cases, and it's not hard to tweak.

      Do you actually own an Android phone? *sigh* Please read a bit (or just play around it, I found a lot of the above, just through using the phone).

      Cheers,
      Victor

    85. Re:I'm Confused... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      It's open, just not to you. But doesn't feel so much better to be fucked over by a corporation that uses Open Source software ?

      Apple is a corporation that uses open source software. Where do you think WebKit came from?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    86. Re:I'm Confused... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Oh, right. That'd be good advice if you were allowed to install whatever you wanted on the device. Only problem is, you can't, because it's not an open device.

    87. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can tether the HTC Incredible. PdaNET much? I've been using my unlimited data plan on my laptop now for over a month. It's pretty sweet. There is also a backdoor way to link the Incredible

    88. Re:I'm Confused... by 4phun · · Score: 1

      Tether all you want but after July 29, 2010 it is going to cost you big time in the USA on all new Android phones at Verizon. I figure it is going to cost $960 a year (5 GB) for less data than I get with AT&T on the original 3G iPad for only $360 total.

    89. Re:I'm Confused... by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      Whomever told you that Android being open source meant you could do whatever you want with your phone did you a disservice.

      Android is FOSS, but it's running on proprietary hardware - hardware which manufacturers are incented to lock down and prevent you from modifying the software on the phone.

      In part this is to protect the phone from being subject to corrupt upgrades (if the signature of the OS package isn't correct, it won't install), but in larger part it is to allow phone companies to restrict access to functions they'd rather you not have.

      If you really wanted an open phone, look into Openmoko, or if you want the next best thing (but in a real world usable format), Nexus One was a pretty big win right up until it stopped being sold.

      For example, the way I enable tethering on my vanilla N1 is to go Settings->Wireless & Networks -> Tethering & Portable Hotspot. Here I can either turn the phone into a wireless access point or enable USB tethering.

      Google controlled this phone, not the phone company, so the full suite of functionality is available out of the box, the vendor hasn't disabled anything.

    90. Re:I'm Confused... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I love me some open Linux-y goodness, but Android isn't open.

      The source of Android is open. The phones it comes pre-installed on aren't.

    91. Re:I'm Confused... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      If we're going to start considering devices to be "open" because you theoretically can hack them, then the iPhone is open too.

      His point is exactly the opposite: the software is open, the devices are not. Tivo is another non-open device. PCs, on the other hand, are open devices; they're designed to make it easy to install whatever OS you want on it. And more than that: you can easily insert new hardware and replace existing hardware. Try that with your phone or Tivo.

      What we need is a high quality, open phone that we can install our own stuff on. Or maybe we need a law that makes it illegal to deny people full access to their own stuff.

    92. Re:I'm Confused... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Is it? I thought the Android kernel is derrived from the linux kernel, and therefore GPL2.

    93. Re:I'm Confused... by Shihar · · Score: 1

      You are pretty confused. The difference between Android and Apple is that if I want a big ass screen, I go get an Evo. If I want a more manageable sized phone, I get an N1 or something. If I want a phone with a slide out keyboard, I get one of those. If I want to be on Verizon, I get a Droid. If I prefer Sprint, I get an Evo. If I want an unlocked phone with no subside but a cheaper plan, I get a T-mobile Android. If I want a cheap Android, I get a cheap Android. If I want a demon of a phone summoned from the pits of hell, I get one of those. If I want an app that Lord Job's doesn't approve of (like Google Voice), I get it. When I want to download a non-approved app, I don't "hack" my phone, I just check a check box in the settings page saying I am okay with that. When I want to change my freaking notification sound to a non-corporation approved one... I just change it.

      With Apple... you get an iPhone. Want something a little different to meet your needs? Too fucking bad. Now cough up the credit card and get ready to be bent over and violated by AT&T's awesome service.

      If you really like the idea of one company controlling the hardware, software, app store, and taking a pile of money from you for the privilege, eh, stick with Apple. You apparently like the "walled suburb" approach. More power to you. I hear the iPhone 4 is totally awesome. I heard that with the upgrade Lord Jobs lets you change your background to anything you want, not just Apple Corp approved ones! Wow! I bet with iPhone 5 you will get an 'upgrade' that lets you change your notification sounds to non-Apple Corp approved ones! The upgrades never cease! First, copy and paste, then gimped multi tasking! It looks totally awesome over there. What features will Apple think up next! Man, the 'burbs are totally awesome and exciting.

      Thanks. I'll stick with Android. What can I say, I am a city boy.

    94. Re:I'm Confused... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      WTF are you talking about...

      I'm trying to install MARKET apps. the free ones that for some reason the app makers dont want to bother with putting the apk on their websites for those of us with non blessed phones....

      I did my research, Unless you got a way to get the market on a rooted phone or device and make it work without alerting google. That would start to walk onto the illegal side of things.. I want open, and that means gimmie the free apps that are ONLY available on the market.

      Many of the free app makers utterly ignore those of us that dont have access to the Market.. That is my gripe.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    95. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      once again no..... cydia

    96. Re:I'm Confused... by happydan · · Score: 1

      So wait... you did your research but still bought a phone that doesn't have the market installed? I don't think you can blame Google for that. And if developers only want to make their apps available through the market, that's their prerogative. Next you'll blame Valve for devs only releasing stuff on Steam...

    97. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do androids on AT&T allow tethering? I was under the impression AT&T disallowed tethering, or at least charged a monthly fee for it, across all their phones.

    98. Re:I'm Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Android 2.2 is available for the Incredible without rooting it? Oh wait, nope. How long do you think we'll get to wait, about 8 months like we had to wait for Eris to get the upgrade from 1.6 to 2.1

    99. Re:I'm Confused... by byisk · · Score: 1

      Android is not open, nor is Chrome. I wrote a post on my blog about it.

      --
      Do not forget to check out my blog.
  5. RageMore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    The bloatware is Sprint's doing on the HTC EVO... has nothing to do with Android.

    1. Re:RageMore by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      The bloatware is Sprint's doing on the HTC EVO... has nothing to do with Android.

      This is a really good point. When you're buying a phone from a Wireless provider, you're buying the phone "as is" with whatever features (software) the provider adds to it, whether they add value or not. The reasons you can't uninstall them may include:

      1. Features may be required to enure the carrier can deliver all the services they promised (e.g. Sprint's free GPS app)
      2. Features to fulfill contractual obligations (e.g. "you agree to provide a copy of Amazon music store on each device you sell.")
      3. Features that support internal promotional interests (e.g. the infamous Sprint NASCAR app)

      If you know about these things before you buy the phone, and know you will not be able to remove them, then it's not a problem. This so-called "bloatware" is only a problem for people who don't understand that these things are, essentially, part of the phone. It's part of what you paid for when you bought the phone from Sprint (or AT&T, or Verizon, etc.)

    2. Re:RageMore by frnic · · Score: 1

      And how is it this is so much better than iPhone?

  6. Bloatware != crapware by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Crapware is stuff that is installed by the device manufacturer, usually in exchange for money (although in Android's case possibly so Google can get advertising money later), which is not required by the user and consumes resources. Bloatware is software that does something useful, but does so in a very inefficient way, typically including a large number of superfluous features. They are not the same thing.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Bloatware != crapware by tepples · · Score: 0

      Under your definition, the entire distribution loaded on the handset is "bloatware" because it does something useful (it makes calls) but includes superfluous features (the "crapware").

    2. Re:Bloatware != crapware by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      What if the software is something that does something useful, but you don't use it, in a very inefficient way (Like some of the HP Printer Features that start on startup, regardless if you have a printer set up or not).

    3. Re:Bloatware != crapware by Michael+Kristopeit · · Score: 1

      then the OS, as shipped including the manufacturer's extensions, is bloatware... the individual applications still are not, and "android" still is not.

    4. Re:Bloatware != crapware by Apple+Acolyte · · Score: 1

      The Raven is exactly correct. Bloatware is highly bloated software that works but is overly large and complex, like Microsoft Office. I didn't know what to call useless OEM installed software before this, but crapware is an appropriate description of it.

      --
      Part of the hardcore faithful who believed in Apple long before it was cool again to do so
    5. Re:Bloatware != crapware by hellop2 · · Score: 1

      I agree with this. Bloatware is does not mean pre-installed software. Bloatware refers to something like when Nero 5 or so went from dozens of megabytes to hundreds of megabytes when it changed to its later incarnations that wanted to be a search engine, media-library, etc... Or when the great free small bittorrent client Azureus changed to the gigantic ad supported media-library bloatware known as Vuze. Also compare PDF exchange 12MB, Foxit Reader 6MB and Adobe Reader 279MB. Guess which one of these is bloatware?

      Bloatware: when upgrades and extraneous bundled packages greatly increase the download/installed/memory/processor utilization of a necessarily compact software package.

      --
      How many more years will slashdot have an off-by-one error on your Score in your profile?
    6. Re:Bloatware != crapware by mocoloco · · Score: 1

      Yup. I can't believe this story got put on Slashdot as is, no geek should confuse those two terms.

  7. Chime in, economists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Economists:

    Is this an issue that the free market should settle (i.e. If you don't want bloatware, research your phone and reward another company with your funds)?
    Is this an issue that regulation should settle (something about property rights? selling what some would call a defective product? fraud?)

    Discuss.

    1. Re:Chime in, economists by Haffner · · Score: 1
      I'll bite.

      Uneducated Peons:

      I favor regulation, because as the percentage of sheep in the American public rises, marketing budgets, and therefore, corporations, control an increasing percentage of mindshare. This in turn lets them tell you that filling 3GB of your 4GB phone with software that can't be uninstalled is saving you time finding and researching programs (they already offer you the best ones). Also, they offer the best value for your money, because all those free apps that do the same thing in 1/10th the resources just aren't as good. Also, you have to download new features periodically, which takes time. Isn't it nicer to never have to deal with updates (for the low fee of $4 per app per month)?

      Love,

      Optimistic Economist

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    2. Re:Chime in, economists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Bioshock is simply the FPS manifestation of a /. economics discussion. My mind is blown.

    3. Re:Chime in, economists by Haffner · · Score: 1

      First Person Satire?

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    4. Re:Chime in, economists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't sell a communications services because the government has granted exclusive rights for certain broadcast frequencies to other companies.

      That said, IMHO, broadcast carriers should be restricted to services only. They should have no say on the type of device you use to access their networks. Strangely, this is the case for landlines which I don't think should be allowed since you are NOT required to use any particular physical connection to your dwelling.

    5. Re:Chime in, economists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you provide me with hardware that has software on it that I can't remove, I should be able to take you to court and sue you into the ground. This sort of behavior should be illegal.

        My $0.02.

    6. Re:Chime in, economists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A free market will have regulations that recognize property rights. The term "free market" doesn't mean "completely unregulated market." It means "market that is not controlled by the government." A regulation that recognizes property rights is not control over a market, in fact it diminishes control, in this case, of sprint.

      It doesn't have to be all one way or the other.

    7. Re:Chime in, economists by magamiako1 · · Score: 1

      @AC

      You might want to consider telling this to your buddies, because anywhere else on the internet, "free market" means "completely unregulated." Any laws put in place by the government that "restrict" a private entity to sell or purchase whatever it is they want is regulation. I'd bring up the stuff about cocaine being sold in Coca-Cola, or heroine being sold as a teething agent for babies--but these are things that most "teabaggers" accept as necessary regulation, but it's the same principle applied to everything else. Some stuff just needs regulation so large corporations cannot harm the greater good. Where that line is drawn, however, is usually up for debate. On a technology note, I feel that anything that hinders forward moving technological progress as a barrier. Think of it like a wall of water and a dam. The water (the ideas that people have, the people, the overall technology usage) are going to push forward regardless (increased YouTube usage, increased wireless internet usage, increased mobile internet usage), and the companies are trying to set up barriers (data caps, strict control of devices and software) to prevent that. But not only are the companies strictly blocking consumers, but they're also blocking potential future markets. And it seems kind of odd that in this day and age, where we are in need of *something* to really bring back this economy, that an area of consistently proven, massive, and fast growth (i.e. the Internet), that we allow such blocks on access to that global network. And this is where I feel that government regulation should step in.

      Unfortunately for these larger carriers, we need to redefine what it means to be someone that provides access to the internet. At this point, the Internet itself is a public good, and is in the best interests of everyone involved (despite the fact that sites such as 4chan exist). And since it is a massive, public good, that has created ridiculous amounts of wealth and has opened vastly new opportunities for people to make money, it needs to be treated differently. It shouldn't be "you are connecting to the company's network", it should be "the company is a gateway to the Internet cloud." I guess an analogy I would try and use (oh I love analogies, sorry, I use them a lot because I have to talk technical speak down to a lot of non-technical people) is that the Internet is more like our land and our country, our Earth itself. In the real world, to get from Point A to Point B, we have decided that interstate highways and roads should fall under the public good, because commerce between areas is a great thing. Right now, the internet doesn't have the equivalent of public roads. It'd be like driving from DC to Baltimore and hitting multiple private areas where each person that owns that area charges a toll to let you through to where you need to go. And worse yet (for lower tier carriers), they get charged with your toll (though they ultimately charge you more to make up for the toll they pay).

      If anyone can't see why we need to vastly rethink what all of this means, they need to be smacked.

  8. So root it. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Root the phone and remove that garbage.

    1. Re:So root it. by byersjus · · Score: 0

      Seriously, grow a pair and follow some simple instructions to root. It's not hard at all. Some phones have a PC app to do it for you (EVO included): http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=706411

  9. The Great Thing About Android by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Is that phone makers can do anything they want with it.

    The horrible thing about Android is that phone makers can do anything they want with it.

    “It’s different from phone to phone and operator to operator,” says Keith Nowak, spokesman for HTC. “But in general, the apps are put there to meet the operator’s business and revenue needs.”

    Nowak must be new to PR. He was supposed to spin it as "free apps, everybody wins!" But instead he handed out a healthy dosage of the truth. Enjoy it, it rarely happens.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Great Thing About Android by mapkinase · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dream of the future when "phone service" will be provided by assigning phone address to MAC of whatever device you are using (like Skype).

      May be in the future there will be only data plan and only VOIP on top of it.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    2. Re:The Great Thing About Android by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Nowak must be new to PR. He was supposed to spin it as "free apps, everybody wins!" But instead he handed out a healthy dosage of the truth. Enjoy it, it rarely happens.

      He didn't want his company to look like the asshole when phones with his logo are full of shite. For all their faults HTC usually includes little more nonsense than a slightly goofy, somewhat inefficient but typically pretty interface and some matching apps (to run the camera and such) to go with it. You can usually disable their interface pretty easily.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:The Great Thing About Android by rm999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd love to hear his explanation of why Apple doesn't resort to such measures but somehow makes billions of dollars a year. I realize that catching up to the market leader is tough, but shouldn't that encourage companies to give their customers a BETTER product/price, not worse?

    4. Re:The Great Thing About Android by bkgood · · Score: 1

      “It’s different from phone to phone and operator to operator,” says Keith Nowak, spokesman for HTC. “But in general, the apps are put there to meet the operator’s business and revenue needs.”

      So in essence, carriers are doing with Android phones what they've been doing with other phones for ages, installing stuff that makes them money with minimal added utility for the user. Color me surprised.

      Consequently, the solutions are what they've always been: modify the phone in some non-supported way, or buy a non-carrier-branded, non-contract phone for loads more than what you'd pay otherwise. And like most of everything else on /., this becomes non-news.

    5. Re:The Great Thing About Android by jwinster · · Score: 1

      Incidentally this is exactly the reason that Android was able to take off. Cell phone manufacturers and wireless companies wanted to be able to put their own applications on your smartphone (similar to the way they behave with their feature phones), and they wanted something cheaper than paying for windows mobile licenses. Android filled both those requirements by being free, and they can install their own crapware to try and get you to continue to add to your monthly bill by paying for their services. Remember, cell phone companies are constantly trying to stay important by being content providers, rather than just being dumb data carriers like what happened to the phone companies.

      --
      Q.E.D.
    6. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this basically what Windows Mobile was all about? Didn't work out so great for them.

    7. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Market leader?

      HTC 18 Billion in April
      http://www.worldtech24.com/phones/htc-sales-hit-record-figures-april-reports-reuters

      Apple 10 Billion in a quarter

      http://www.muniwireless.com/2009/01/22/apple-defies-financial-crisis-quarterly-sales-surpass-10-billion/

      Try again on who is leading the market, because it sure does not appear to be Apple.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    8. Re:The Great Thing About Android by donny77 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, this is part of why I laugh when people complain about AT&T iPhone exclusivity. Apple went to Verizon first. Verizon said you'll install our crapware and Jobs said no and went to AT&T. I bet teh biggest reason there is no Verizon or Sprint iPhone right now, is crapware. Jobs will not let them install it.

    9. Re:The Great Thing About Android by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't do this because its customers are financially rewarding it for not to do that type of thing. If Apple started, it would get punished by its current customer base who would move their $$$ elswhere if suitably annoyed. Apple also has 0 3rd party crapware on its computers AFAIK for the same reason. Dell's customers, otoh, would probably care less about bloatware if they could get the computer for $5 cheaper.

      It's just like a Ferrari customers would get annoyed if they sat in their new car only to feel some cheap vinyl seats. Sure, Ferrari could save some money up front, but their image would suffer. (No, I'm not comparing Apple's Computer's to Ferrari's, just the demograhics.)

    10. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Speaking as an ignoramus about phones and monthly plans (my mobile is years old), can you tell me in a nutshell why Skype-like programs aren't widespread by now? You'd think the public would want to dash towards free calls.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    11. Re:The Great Thing About Android by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Apple controls the hardware and software. They don't let the AT&T make decisions. Using android is a race to the bottom.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    12. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      HTC makes a lot of phones, or are you trying to make up something that is not factual?

      HTC does not ONLY make android phones, they make a metric crapload of phone models.. Just like Nokia does.

      Oh and MOST of their sales are outside the USA.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:The Great Thing About Android by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      I have to thank Jobs for that move. Consequently, I have a Droid that came crapware free. That was a pretty wierd step for Verizon and likely due to being off-balance by the iPhone.

    14. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've thought the same thing about cable TV and internet service. But it'll never happen, at least, not without some serious pressure against the telecoms (regulation, turning them into utilities in the same sense as water electricity, etc). Why would they give up the ability to charge you twice for the same service?

    15. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Idbar · · Score: 1

      They don't let the AT&T make decisions.

      Like tethering for example? You're saying that's Apple decision?

    16. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > You'd think the public would want to dash towards free calls.

      Because, in America at least, there's no such thing as free/low-cost wireless service that's pervasive AND works with anything vaguely resembling a high-end Android phone. American wireless service is kind of like a nightclub with a high cover charge, but free drinks and all you can eat buffet once you're past the doorman & cashier. If you're paying Sprint $90/month for "unlimited everything", there's no incentive to screw with Skype unless you have to make international calls. And with most calling cards seemingly hovering at around 2.9c/minute for international calls, even those aren't worth the hassle and latency unless you're wearing a headset and watching synchronized DVDs together with someone on the other side of the world for hours at a time.

    17. Re:The Great Thing About Android by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      This is not true, I have one, and it has facebook, amazon music and similar nonsense.

    18. Re:The Great Thing About Android by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Cause it sucked. No touch, slow, crashes no matter what if the OS is that bad it will not take off.

    19. Re:The Great Thing About Android by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I forgot about the facebook app. Sure enough - it's there. Amazon MP3 store - check. I've never even launched them; forgot they were even there. Missing was all the VCast, ringtone store, and other junk that usually comes with a Verizon phone.

      There are pre-installed apps that I do use. Google Navigator. Youtube. Gmail. The Corporate email / calendar app. I'm sure some of that is Google standard and some of it is Motorola. Doubt any of that is Verizon.

    20. Re:The Great Thing About Android by MogNuts · · Score: 1

      And you know this how?

      The general consensus is that Verizon didn't want to become Apple's bitch. They said no to modifying the network just for special Apple and wouldn't pay them protection money for each phone sold.

    21. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Shihar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That is a nice noble fantasy you have. The deal was not settled on who offered more or less bloatware. The deal was based purely upon who would share the most profit. Verizon and AT&T bid. AT&T offered to cut Apple into vastly more profit than Verizon was. Verizon looked at the numbers and told Apple to go take a hike. Comparing AT&T and Verizon's stock price changes, it is pretty clear that Verizon didn't make a mistake. AT&T got exactly nothing when they got the iPhone. That is also the reason why Verizon is completely uninterested in the iPhone. They are not willing to pay the Apple tax and are pretty content to build their Droid line and keep all the profit.

    22. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Shihar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was totally Apple's idea to put in band width caps and prevent tethering.

    23. Re:The Great Thing About Android by tom229 · · Score: 1

      iPhones are also GSM only. There is no CDMA model that I'm aware of.

      --
      If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
    24. Re:The Great Thing About Android by donny77 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was most certainly not "purely" on revenue. There were many demands Apple had. They ALL played a part in the decision. Remember, Verizon was a very different company back then. Everything was locked tight on Verizon phones. I believe no, or maybe one Palm, Verizon phone had Wifi enabled. Verizon has changed a lot since the iPhone and a big part of that is trying to keep customers from jumping to AT&T.

      Apple's Demands

      • Phone not available to carrier until after launch
      • Apple retains control over OS updates
      • No branding (i.e. no Verizon logo on the phone)
      • No crapware (i.e. VCast)
      • Visual Voicemail
      • Revenue sharing
      • Unlimited data at "cheaper than previous" pricing
    25. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been waiting for this ever since Google added video chat to gmail (what, about 4-5 years ago? And even then, they were late to the game).
      It's the obvious, efficient way to do things, increasing the user's power and reducing carriers to dumb pipes (they've proven long ago that they deserve no more than that). But that's also why we haven't seen it yet - carriers benefit by holding this progress back, or else risk becoming entirely irrelevant. What would be the difference between a dumb satellite or tower pipe, and a dumb wi-fi pipe? None, exactly!
      I figured Google was bringing out Android exactly for this (I hoped for wifi mesh networking, Video and VOIP), and this is actually the only criticism I had about the N1 when I bought it and understood Google didn't feel ready to bring this to market.

      And now they've let Apple steal the thunder, even though facetime is a relatively trivial and obvious implementation (also helluvalot prior-arted by most of 20th-century SF) of basic smartphone capabilities.

    26. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I was pointing out that Apple is hardly the market leader on cell phone sales. Though I failed at that as I didn't know T$ means Tiwanese money. There are many cell phone manufacturers that make much more then Apple, so they are hardly the biggest or the best, they are new to the game, and making the mistakes many of the manufacturers learned from years back.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    27. Re:The Great Thing About Android by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      AT&T offered to cut Apple into vastly more profit than Verizon was. Verizon looked at the numbers and told Apple to go take a hike. Comparing AT&T and Verizon's stock price changes, it is pretty clear that Verizon didn't make a mistake.

      And what is the source of this information?

      AT&T got exactly nothing when they got the iPhone. That is also the reason why Verizon is completely uninterested in the iPhone. They are not willing to pay the Apple tax and are pretty content to build their Droid line and keep all the profit.

      AT&T got tons of new subscribers and profits thanks to Apple so I wouldn't say they got nothing. As for Apple tax, what are you talking about? The main reason Verizon likes Android is that they get a lot of control of what they put on the phone. With Windows, they are limited. With Symbian they are limited. With RIM, they are limited. With Apple, they have to accept Apple's terms.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    28. Re:The Great Thing About Android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both of those are there on the Nexus One, too, so those seems to be originating with what Google thinks people want.

    29. Re:The Great Thing About Android by 4phun · · Score: 1

      That is a nice noble fantasy you have. The deal was not settled on who offered more or less bloatware. The deal was based purely upon who would share the most profit. AT&T got exactly nothing when they got the iPhone. That is also the reason why Verizon is completely uninterested in the iPhone. They are not willing to pay the Apple tax and are pretty content to build their Droid line and keep all the profit.

      AT&T just came off their most profitable quarter. They sold 3.2 million iPhones 2Q. Over one million was to customers leaving Verizon and Sprint for the AT&T iPhone. So in the mind of a /. contributor that is AT&T getting nothing?

  10. Standard phone bloatware by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    Every phone I've ever had (except my G1) has had bloatware on it, if it could run custom apps. My razor had some demo games. My Sony had some demo games. And no, you couldn't delete them.

    The G1 is an exception only because Android was so new at the time is my assumption.

    The news here isn't that Android phones have bloatware... It's that they were previously unlike the other phones in this respect, and now they aren't. Not a real Big surprise. It's not like it even takes up phone memory... They're in the firmware, like all the other built-in apps.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  11. bloatware CAN be removed by zill · · Score: 1, Informative

    Unfortunately the bloatware (aka 'crapware') that comes with these phones has a nasty quality not found on even the most bloated PC: it can't be removed.

    Not true. On a rooted phone it's as simple as "adb uninstall".

    Of course some users are not technically inclined enough to root their phones, but as it stands the statement is blatantly false.

    1. Re:bloatware CAN be removed by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 5, Funny

      I remember the good old days when Android fans made fun of the iPhone because some people did a jailbreak to install software, now those same people have to jailbreak their phones to be able to uninstall some software. Oh the irony.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    2. Re:bloatware CAN be removed by Andtalath · · Score: 1

      Talk about nitpick. Saying that you have to hack your phone to remove a program means that it can't, by design, be done. What you are saying is akin to saying that since you can (with enough tampering) install the latest android on a windows mobile phone, then that is a great android mobile.

    3. Re:bloatware CAN be removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless they are like me and loathe this scenario just as much. For example, I will not buy either. And others, though not all, around me share this outlook.

      But I do hope you find happiness in other people's unhappiness. Really, I do.

      PS, though you are modded funny, I think you mean it.

    4. Re:bloatware CAN be removed by TrancePhreak · · Score: 1

      Clicking a button that says you have root (Android) vs downloading software from the internet that creates a backup that is altered (iPhone).

      --

      -]Phreak Out[-
    5. Re:bloatware CAN be removed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't so long ago on this very site that someone told me I shouldn't have bought an iPhone, that I was obviously not Apple's intended market, and was stupid for jailbreaking the device. That somehow doing things to the device that Apple did not approve of was wrong of me. Poor, poor Apple--how could I abuse them like that.

      Have since moved to a Droid. I like it.

    6. Re:bloatware CAN be removed by the_y_the · · Score: 1

      Many users may be technically inclined but their phone may not have a viable root yet, e.g. Motorola Backflip, Droid X, etc. Of course you could say that they should have gotten a more "open" phone, but the article's point still stands that in many cases crapware is not removeable from Android phone.

  12. Not everyone can get T-Mobile by tepples · · Score: 1, Informative

    Guess that'll teach ya to buy GSM only and direct from the manufacturer.

    Too bad for people who live or work in a part of the United States where T-Mobile doesn't have a reliable signal. Verizon and Sprint are CDMA2000, and unlike T-Mobile's "Even More Plus", AT&T doesn't appear to offer a discount on the plan for bringing your own phone.

    1. Re:Not everyone can get T-Mobile by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      Unlocked N1 on AT&T here, less than a year left on the 2 year contract I originally signed to get an Iphone 3gs then I keep my current plan month to month for as long as I keep on paying. So long as I continue to buy unlocked I have a true unlimited plan for as long as I feel like sticking with AT&T, they can't impose the new caps on me.

      As LTE gains traction for 4g it may eventually be possible to buy an unlocked phone that works on all 4 carriers (one can only hope but I'm not holding my breath).

    2. Re:Not everyone can get T-Mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my last cust help call to T-Mobile Robert busted his hump trying to help me with my problem. We failed, but I'm stayin' the course because of his effort. All my other contacts were in the evening, so I got the T-Mobile Calcutta Repatory Company. The experiences there were universally maddening. AT&T is rotten through and through.

  13. Nothing new by sarysa · · Score: 1

    Even though Android is a smartphone platform, it will ultimately be the carriers' and manufacturers' successor to the J2ME and BREW platforms. Android is merely inheriting practices that have evolved over the last 8 years or so. My Palm Pre also has unremovable bloatware. (unless you root the device) It's not going to go away anytime soon.

    --
    Charisma is the measure of someone's ability to lie with a straight face.
    1. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any bets on whether or not insmod kexec.ko works?

  14. Re:Tit for tat by DJRumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple doesn't install said Fart apps. rather the end users choose to. Not so with bloatware...

  15. 2005 Dell... same sh*t 5 years later. by AmazinglySmooth · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had to reimage my father's PC, a 2005 Dell, using the built-in system restore feature. Now he has AOL and Norton that is seriously out of date!!! This stuff never dies. It took another 30 minutes for me to remove all the crap and put on newer versions of other crap.

    1. Re:2005 Dell... same sh*t 5 years later. by JasonMaggini · · Score: 1

      They need this kind of program for phones.

    2. Re:2005 Dell... same sh*t 5 years later. by Beat+The+Odds · · Score: 1

      Make sure you create a new disk image once you get the crap off that machine. Then it's a bit easier the next time. There are plenty of free and open source solutions to that nowadays.

    3. Re:2005 Dell... same sh*t 5 years later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to reimage my father's PC, a 2005 Dell, using the built-in system restore feature.

      You didn't *have* to. I just use a Windows installation CD. Dell's website is pretty good for drivers.
      In fact, I just use a Windows installation CD on brand-new machines to get rid of crapware.

      Next in this thread: someone talks about installing Linux.

    4. Re:2005 Dell... same sh*t 5 years later. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that was two comments up and called "You are not alone..."

      As for restore disks, I've never had one as I build my PCs. If I'm ever given one to repair a PC, I throw it away and give them a copy of the slipstreamed CD I make every month. They only ever have to get maybe 50MB of updates after that, and they seem more than happy. A second CD has the latest drivers.

      All part of the service :)

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  16. Not a major problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this a problem? most non-technical people I know don't really care about the preinstalled crap on their phones, and just live with it. Anyone with a bit of technical know-how will probably root the phone, or flash a new rom onto it anyway

    1. Re:Not a major problem by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Well the Droid X is pretty much unflashable with non Moto roms. There are other phones that still haven't been rooted. Relying on back doors to solve problems with front doors only works as long as the back door exists.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    2. Re:Not a major problem by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Here is a better idea, don't buy phones like the droid X.

  17. Custom ROMs by nukem996 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even custom ROMs suffer from this a bit. Whatever the author of the ROM thinks is a good application your stuck with. The only way I've been able to get a slim down ROM from my Droid is by downloading a ROM and customizing it myself.

    1. Re:Custom ROMs by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      Or you can just delete the apps you don't want. A heck of a lot easier than cooking your own ROM.

    2. Re:Custom ROMs by Reilaos · · Score: 1

      This is true, but it can easily become a bother, since upgrading the ROM will typically bring back the stuff you uninstalled the last time around.

    3. Re:Custom ROMs by mlts · · Score: 1

      If you are not careful and try that on a rooted Motorola CLIQ, you will end up with a lovely bootloop until you restore from a nandroid backup or reflash.

    4. Re:Custom ROMs by nukem996 · · Score: 1

      Well thats what I do. I take a custom ROM and delete the things I don't want.

    5. Re:Custom ROMs by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Or you find a ROM that tries to provide a Stock feel. The Cyanogen roms are fairly famous for this. It's as close to stock as you can get. No special themes, no extra apps, just a rooted ROM with extra goodies. As soon as you turn it on, the only difference you would notice is a few extra settings that you can play with, and the ability to install whatever kernel and apps you want.

    6. Re:Custom ROMs by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 0

      You must have seen the news that Dell was shipping a trojan on one (admitted) server Motherboard.

      http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2010/07/pc-giant-warns-of-hardware-tro.html

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  18. Re:Synonyms by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shovelware, Bloatware, Crapware, pre-installed software, Windows Vista,

    they're all interchangable really.

  19. Cook your own ROM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Windows Mobile phone from Sprint which has the way cool NASCAR program... The nice thing is that I can cook my own roms. I have been cooking my own roms for the past four years and it is nice to be able to remove the Crap Ware and replace it with useful applications.

    Andriod is open right? Why not do the same thing... Just cook and burn your own rom without the crap... If you don't want to cook your own rom there are usually about 5 guys in any phone group who cook roms and share them with the general public. Certainly, it is possible to find a rom you like.

    I figure, if the garbage exists in the phone to start with then the phone was probably cheaper than it otherwise would have been... Then I get rid of the garbage... Best of both worlds...

     

    1. Re:Cook your own ROM by cynyr · · Score: 1

      some android based phones(droidX) will only load signed roms. So you need to root the rom and use adb to delete apps.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  20. AKA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AKA crapware
    AKA awfulware
    AKA poopieware
    AKA turdware
    AKA not-very-nice-at-all-ware

  21. Wired == Apple Fanboys by concord · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm not surprised this is a 'WIRED' article. They are such Apple fanboys. I've come so close to canceling my subscription because they go on and on ad nauseum about Apple, Inc.

    --
    MFG: "The system supports both the LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP) and WIMP (Windows, IIS, MySQL, PHP) platforms."
    1. Re:Wired == Apple Fanboys by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised this is a 'WIRED' article. They are such Apple fanboys. I've come so close to canceling my subscription because they go on and on ad nauseum about Apple, Inc.

      Be that as it may, the truth still prevails.

  22. Bloatware, Crapware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why I am not a fan of the Evo, has too much crap on it. Not a bad phone but so much crap that it is annoying. In most cases I would rather have antennagate than crapware. With antennagate I can put on a cover, with the evo crapware it is stuck there unless you jailbreak it which is more of a pain than what it is worth.

  23. Re:Tit for tat by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bloatware is when the user bought a fart app, which also queefs.

  24. Re:Synonyms by Shoe+Puppet · · Score: 1

    Providers are installing Windows Vista on Android phones? The performance must be horrible.

    --
    (+1, Disagree)
  25. Speaking as a fan... by Trufagus · · Score: 1

    I think Android is great but this really sucks.

    In theory 'Preloaded' applications on an Android phone would not be that bad. Uninstalling apps on Android is simple and doesn't leave much of a trace - compared to preloaded apps on Windows this is much easier to deal with.

    But 'preloaded' apps that you can't uninstall is a deal breaker.

    What we need is a premium brand for Android phones. A brand where we pay a bit more to get something without the preloaded apps, with no shortcuts taken on the hardware, and with fast updates to
      new versions of Android.

    I was hoping that the Nexus line were going to be that, but I guess that is not to be.

    1. Re:Speaking as a fan... by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

      Ummm, no. I will NOT pay more for the privilege of having less bloatware. That's just stupid. Here's what should happen - you pay for a basic android based phone with only the stock apps/functionality that comes with the base OS. Then the vendors make apps that are actually useful and wanted by people. Then I pay extra if I want the useful app that I didn't get with the basic environment. Paying extra (aka bribing) to keep stuff you don't want off your phone is just nuts.

    2. Re:Speaking as a fan... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paying extra (aka bribing) to keep stuff you don't want off your phone is just nuts.

      No, it's not. Not if the carrier makes money from having the stuff in there. If you're willing to pay more, they'll leave it out. If you want to be in the market, then you play their game. If you don't like the game, just walk away. But as the iPhone song says, you won't walk away, because you like the phones too much.

    3. Re:Speaking as a fan... by Trufagus · · Score: 1

      Putting the bloatware on the phone (or PC) allows the vendor to sell it for less. The difference is small but most consumers are very price conscious.

      If you aren't willing to pay anything more then the current prices then you won't get a phone without bloatware.

  26. verizion by ron-l-j · · Score: 1

    I had emailed verizion cust support about the apps they preinstall. They said they could not help me with removing them. Rooting is an option I am looking in to. -- I never did give them hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell - Harry S Truma

    1. Re:verizion by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Take them to small claims court - your phone is defective because of the unwanted bloatware on it. Either they acknowledge that YOU are the owner of the phone, and provide a way to remove the crap, or they refund the portion of your money covering the "purchase" of your phone.

    2. Re:verizion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the phone is not defective! It makes calls, the app store works and it does everything an Android phone can do. Any judge would laugh you out of court if you tried to claim that a few pieces of added software 'breaks' the phone. Just because it has something *you* don't want doesn't make it broken. If you're so upset about all of the bloat on Android phones, why don't you just go buy a Jitterbug?

  27. not the same as windows bloatware by ani23 · · Score: 1

    this stuff installed assume just sits there till someone uses it. unless its used i dont see how it slows the phone down. with bloatware on windows most of the shiat is running in background processes like av, scanners, free firewalls etc etc. not exactly the same and not as bad either.

    1. Re:not the same as windows bloatware by SLot · · Score: 4, Informative

      no, it doesn't.

      On my EVO, I have never used FM Radio or Music, yet both are running in the background after booting.

      Clearly, not using them doesn't mean they don't run and consume resources.

    2. Re:not the same as windows bloatware by ani23 · · Score: 1

      my bad. yeah that kinda blows.

    3. Re:not the same as windows bloatware by SLot · · Score: 1

      It totally blows.

      I was on the phone yesterday with our rep and he asked how I was liking the phone.

      I told him I loved it, but I was thinking of rooting it so I could remove Nascar and some of the other stuff Sprint installs.

      His response suprised me: "Just root it. You'll get the free hot spot out of it too. I did that to my Nexus."

      I appreciated the honesty.

    4. Re:not the same as windows bloatware by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      The sad part of all of this is that for all the good will he just generated with you he put his job at great risk.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    5. Re:not the same as windows bloatware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it doesn't.

      On my EVO, I have never used FM Radio or Music, yet both are running in the background after booting.

      Clearly, not using them doesn't mean they don't run and consume resources.

      What this guy said, I had to download Advanced App Killer (or something like that name) to shut these things down on my EVO. Guess what happened. My battery life increased by a bunch. The phone is probably faster too, but that's hard to gauge, slow internet speed plus having to download ads (haven't seen many ads in quite a few years) make everything seem to crawl regardless. Honestly, if I had a choice to put a n900 on any carrier around here I'd dump my Android phone like a hot rock. T-Mobile sucks, though, so I can't do it.

    6. Re:not the same as windows bloatware by breser · · Score: 4, Informative

      When I first got my EVO i bought into this. Then I downloaded SystemPanel:
      http://android.nextapp.com/site/systempanel

      At the time all the features of the pay version were in the unlocked version. So I got to play around with the profiling features. I have since paid for the app.

      This is what I discovered. The Sprint apps don't do jack if you never use them. The only app that actually runs despite me having no need for it is the voicemail app because I don't use Sprint's voicemail.

      What people don't understand is that Android loads applications into memory on the idea that you might use them. Which applications it thinks you might use is based on what you actually use. So when you first get the phone and it doesn't have any history and not many applications loaded on it. There's a very good chance that the Sprint apps are going to be the ones getting cached. The cached apps use no CPU time. They're just in memory in case you decide to run them.

      I've stopped using a task killer, my battery time hasn't gotten worse. Nothing about my phone has really changed.

      In short, yeah it sucks you can't remove those apps and they're taking up space, but they're not hurting performance. They're not even running unless you run them.

      See also this explanation from the developer of the SystemPanel app as to why automated task killing is a bad idea:
      http://android.nextapp.com/site/systempanel/doc/autokill

    7. Re:not the same as windows bloatware by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      His response suprised me: "Just root it. You'll get the free hot spot out of it too. I did that to my Nexus."

      You don't need to root N1 to get WiFi hotspot on it, though. It's in stock v2.2.

    8. Re:not the same as windows bloatware by JThundley · · Score: 1

      And my Samsung Moment even respawns these crapware apps after I kill them!

  28. Re:Tit for tat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole MacS is a part app!

  29. This is why I was for the Nexus One by naasking · · Score: 1

    Google's open approach here would have been ideal, if only they had marketed the Nexus One better. I would totally have bought a Nexus Two, but now they're out of the game. Too bad. I hope HTC tries a direct to consumer model at some point too.

    We're all going to suffer awhile longer before this crapware problem gets resolved.

    1. Re:This is why I was for the Nexus One by Second_Derivative · · Score: 1

      Nexus One has precisely this problem, which is why I didn't buy it. It comes with a Facebook app and an Amazon MP3 Store app, neither of which are removable without rooting the phone. Yes there's an officially sanctioned mechanism for rooting and reflashing the devide, but I shouldn't have to void the warranty to remove unwanted functionality.

    2. Re:This is why I was for the Nexus One by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they'll still do the developer editions like they did with the G1/ADB1 and Ion.

  30. Fuck you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am going to lose a lot of karma, but... the hell.

    You have buy a locked down device in a wallet garden, you deserver the worst to you.
    You have not done enough to fight these things. ...humm... I have changed opinion. Posting this anonymous :-)

    1. Re:Fuck you. by shaunbr · · Score: 1

      It's not like there's much choice. I guess I could start my own wireless company, but that would be a bit expensive...

      Locked down devices suck, but I don't 'deserve' anything coming to me because I choose to use one. Given the choice between a locked down device and none at all, I'll keep living in the 21st century and take the former every time. At least with Android devices, you can usually root them and get some of that functionality back. Not anywhere near perfect, but it's better than nothing.

  31. Bloatware / tracking / rooting prevention... by the+ReviveR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is exactly for reasons like this we should support truly open platforms for mobiles instead of "open" like android. I am really happy with my N900 and I hope MeeGo will be a huge success.

    1. Re:Bloatware / tracking / rooting prevention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm yeah what you failed to realize is that people don't want to pay 450 dollars for a phone. They want the subsidized phones and also not get all the extra shit put on them that helps subsidize it. What you are saying applies directly to the Nexus 1. People didn't buy it.

    2. Re:Bloatware / tracking / rooting prevention... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      The Nokia N900 is subsidized and is available from all major carries at about the same price as any other smartphone.

    3. Re:Bloatware / tracking / rooting prevention... by kwalker · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      Seriously. I'd love an N900 without switching carriers or selling organs. Show me where I can get one.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    4. Re:Bloatware / tracking / rooting prevention... by loufoque · · Score: 1

      vodafone

    5. Re:Bloatware / tracking / rooting prevention... by shaunbr · · Score: 1

      Maybe European carriers, but not American ones.

      Besides, the N900 has an uphill battle ahead of it. It's running an OS that's completely different from any other smartphone out there, and even if American carriers chose to offer it subsidized, I doubt most normal phone buyers here would consider it. Nor am I convinced that MeeGo has a future. With iOS and Android already established players, and Microsoft coming in with Windows 7 Mobile, there's no reason for a non-Nokia phone to consider MeeGo as an alternative. Plus, the name really sucks -- it sounds like a retard talking about his day at school -- "Mee go bathroom all by myself. Yay!". Ugh.

    6. Re:Bloatware / tracking / rooting prevention... by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      Came here to post this from my n900. :) Beat me to it.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    7. Re:Bloatware / tracking / rooting prevention... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      The N900 is great and all but you cant get one from ANY of the carriers here in Australia. But you can get Android handsets from all of them.

    8. Re:Bloatware / tracking / rooting prevention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ORLY?
      From what I've seen so far this will be at least as "open" as Android, if not worse.

      It's reveal mentality, protectionism and paranoia all over the place.

    9. Re:Bloatware / tracking / rooting prevention... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indeed, it's brilliant.

      but with skype available together with the default ui for making calls, it will never be subsidized by american carriers, and hence never reach critical mass.

      as for the horde of slashdot geeks, you're a tool if not considering n900 (maemo) and future meego-based releases.

  32. This applies to most phones by C_Kode · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This applies to most phones sold by carriers. Prior to purchasing my Nexus One I had a Blackberry (and the one before it) Both had lots of T-Mobile crap on them that I never used. The good thing about Blackberry though is it allowed me to "hide" any apps I didn't want to see.

    I suppose in Android I just wouldn't put them on any of my multiple desktops and just leave them in the main app list. (if thats possible on those phones)

    1. Re:This applies to most phones by wfolta · · Score: 1

      This applies to most phones sold by carriers.

      Emphasis mine. Bringing the conversation all the way back around: no bloatware on the iPhone. And part of the reason is the dread "walled garden". It keeps the carrier out, too, you know.

    2. Re:This applies to most phones by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      Well, you could "hide" them on a Blackberry, but they were still there. Was easy to uninstall them, though you had to go into the "modules" options instead of "applications" to uninstall the T-Mobile installed crap. Never quite figured that out... why does MySpace _need_ to be on my Blackberry, T-Mobile?

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    3. Re:This applies to most phones by yeshuawatso · · Score: 1

      With my Samsung Vibrant, I was shocked to see SO MUCH software on the device, and even more surprised that I couldn't remove the software at all (especially the DRM for the Avatar movie [which waste a gig on the free 2GB micro-SD card for the movie]). One thing I did notice, you can overwrite some default apps with an app you download off the net with the same name. I almost replaced the default Swype with my beta backup and re-downloaded Kindle from the Android Market and it asked me to replace the app with the same name too. I'm not sure if they have to be from the same publisher, but then again, just change the manifest file to match the app.

      So maybe you can't uninstall the apps, but you may be able to replace them with dummy "service" apps that don't have icons or do anything. Side note, you can uninstall the 75MB Sims 3 game.

    4. Re:This applies to most phones by bkissi01 · · Score: 1

      Well, you could "hide" them on a Blackberry, but they were still there. Was easy to uninstall them, though you had to go into the "modules" options instead of "applications" to uninstall the T-Mobile installed crap. Never quite figured that out... why does MySpace _need_ to be on my Blackberry, T-Mobile?

      I'm not sure what Blackberry OS your referring to, but since at least OS 4.5 the bloatware is actually service books that are pushed down to the device every single time it boots up. They are simple pre-configured browser shortcuts with home screen icons. If you remove the revelant service books from your device when, the next time it boots they are right back on your desktop. My solution is to make one folder called "Garbage" and put all 22 icons in it and then hide the folder. Let's be honest, whether we are talking about Android, Blackberry, or whatever this is simple greed on the part of the wireless carriers. Simply paying your bill isn't enough to make them happy, they have to partner up with everyone who is willing to give them $1 to put an icon on your phone.

  33. Security problems by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My problem with this is security. Every single one of those pre-installed applications have bugs in them that could be exploited by malware. For me, that's what makes it so irritating. An app, that I don't want, is taking up space, and makes my data less secure.

    It's sad how the open platform gets saddled with crap you can't remove and the closed platform (iPhone) is kept clean by a CEO who gives a shit about aesthetics and user experience.

    1. Re:Security problems by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's sad how the open platform gets saddled with crap you can't remove and the closed platform (iPhone) is kept clean by a CEO who gives a shit about aesthetics and user experience.

      Try to get an iPhone without iTunes.

    2. Re:Security problems by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      I think the difference though is that iTunes isn't third party and it is actively maintained by the same company that designed the phone. If you don't like iTunes though, I can see how would be a total deal breaker.

    3. Re:Security problems by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      That's as maybe - but I can hold my Android bloatware any damn way I please & can still send & receive phone calls.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    4. Re:Security problems by thedarknite · · Score: 1

      Or iTunes without Bonjour and Quicktime

      --
      A game has objectives and is competitive, anything else is just play
  34. I liked my Eris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    But since rooting it I love it so much I think I could almost match the toolerosity of apple fanboi.

  35. Re:Synonyms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya, but it has nothing to do with the hardware.

  36. Good point: Buy an open phone by Kludge · · Score: 1

    Another reason I am happy I bought an N900. I can uninstall anything, including OOPS! programs that make my phone work.

    Seriously however, to uninstall the important stuff you have to drop to a shell and know what you're doing. Or half know what you are doing...

  37. Re:Synonyms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bloatware used to refer to software that at one time actually was useful. Then they start adding more and more features that also makes the software slower, more buggy, less reliable, etc. Basically it was another way of saying that it's software affected by feeping creaturism.

    Vista is bloatware.

    The shovelware, crapware, spyware, malware, etc. are what can come with it when you buy it as part of an OEM package.

  38. You are not alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It sounds like you need to sit down with your father and have "the talk." Fortunately, now days you are not alone, and there are plenty of useful web sites to help you through this difficult discussion. One such site can be found here. While it may be a little uncomfortable and possibly a bit embarrassing at first, you will find that he may keep an open mind and be willing to share some of his fears and views on this sensitive but important topic.

  39. Re:Synonyms by ooshna · · Score: 1

    Eww Vista its like Windows Millennium's bastard child.

  40. Step #1 after rooting a Droid Incredible by wrightrocket · · Score: 1

    The first step after rooting my Droid Incredible was to remove bloatware that came with the phone. Shortly after buying my phone, the first post I made to the http://www.incredibleforum.com/ was, "I can't wait to get root!" Unfortunately, this was just a hopeful comment at the time, and a dream that I was not sure would be fulfilled. A dream less likely for owners of the Droid X.

    1. Re:Step #1 after rooting a Droid Incredible by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      Droid X has been rooted as of this morning.... Signed bootloader on teh other hand....

  41. Nothing new by bm_luethke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Very few phones do not work this way and as a number of Apple people say about the closed store geeks get worked up over - few real users are going to care (and in this case I think it is true, in the case of Apple regular people *are* aware of how closed the app store is and are starting to see apps for the Androids that they will never get because of it).

    If you do not want them on your desktop simply press and hold the icon until it "locks" to your finger and drag it to the trash can. It will still be in your list of installed applications (and you will see it when you bring up your app screen) but other than a small amount of storage it doesn't take up anything. They could, of course, at some point force loading of it and have annoying op-up adds but then that *would* be noticed and cared about by pretty much everyone. Heck most do not care if they are eat up with them on the PC to the point their computer slows to a crawl. These applications do not start up in the background (though ones that are widgets will until you remove the widget) so it isn't like they affect anything other than seeing the icon in you full app listing.

    Even in the link form the main article only a VERY small handful of people care more than a "I wish it were not so" (which would be my attitude) and currently all but one person realizes that they can't go someplace else to get away from it (the one posts solution - an iPhone - has applications one pretty much *must* use even if they do not want too, can we say iTunes for interfacing with my phone? Yea, there is where you go for an open extensible phone that doesn't force you into doing something in ways you do not want).

    Of course this is what happens when an Open platform is picked up by business - freedom to do what you want with it means you can make choices others do not like. It isn't freedom if you tell me what I have to do with it. Android is Open and this is why you will see a range from mostly stock (Nexus One and Motorola Droid) to highly modified (Motorola Droid-X and much of the HTC offerings). Most of them can be rooted and your own custom ROM installed - but even most of those are "customized" with applications the ROM developer thought were good ideas. Not to mention the Droid-X has been rooted already, time will tell if they can get around the boot-loader issue or not.

    --
    ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
  42. Re:Iphone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, typically bitter desktop Linux user.

  43. Motoblur by Dani+Filth · · Score: 1

    I wish I could scrape this off my Motorola CLiQ....

    1. Re:Motoblur by mlts · · Score: 1

      Check out the modmymoto.com forum. There are some good CLIQ ROMS that are MotoBlur free. While you are there, you might as well update your phone to Android 2.1 (they have the official T-Mobile version, IIRC, with root access.)

    2. Re:Motoblur by grocer · · Score: 1

      There is no official T-Mobile 2.1 Android update for the Cliq yet...Motorola bumped it from Q2 2010 to sometime in Q3...it is currently "In Testing".

  44. Re:Synonyms by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

    It's not so bad if you turn off Aero.

  45. Annoying. by MaWeiTao · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been considering getting a smartphone recently and one of the things that turned me off from Android phones was all the reports of bloatware. And some carriers, like AT&T, don't even allow the user to delete that crap. The HTC Aria, for example, is stuck with 4 or 5 different AT&T navigation applications, in addition to the one provided by Google. People have managed to hack the phone and are providing clean installs. Years ago I might have done that, but nowadays I don't have the time or patience to deal with that sort of thing.

    This kind of crap automatically leaves me seriously considering an iPhone. Why in the hell is a company like Apple more successful in keeping bloatware off their phones? Why are Google and Microsoft incapable of demanding their products be free of this stuff? It's in their best interests.

    I want something designed well, that just works without and doesn't require me screwing around with the device to get it just right. And this is coming from someone who used to spend a lot of time obsessing over getting icons and tools set up just right. I've designed my own themes for Windows and even found an application that let me create unique themes for my old Sony Ericsson. I like some level of customization but if things are design properly the need for it is diminished.

    It's bad enough having to go through and delete junk that's installing only to try to convince me to waste my money. It's offensive that I can't even remove that crap from the phone.

    For now I'm not getting any smartphone. I'll wait to see how things play out. A regular old phone does the job just fine and I'm in front of a computer all day anyway/

    1. Re:Annoying. by rsborg · · Score: 1

      This kind of crap automatically leaves me seriously considering an iPhone. Why in the hell is a company like Apple more successful in keeping bloatware off their phones? Why are Google and Microsoft incapable of demanding their products be free of this stuff? It's in their best interests.

      Because you're comparing apples to appletrees. Apple makes and sells mainly physical product: the iPhone (you can't buy iOS on it's own) or a Mac (you can't legally install OSX on non-Macs)

      Both Microsoft and Google sell mostly software. And the kicker is that both of them mostly sell it to manufacturers like Dell, HTC or Motorola. All of these "actual customers" are then reselling Microsoft and Google's software to you. So, you are NOT the direct customer of Google or Microsoft. Though Dell's PC sales impacts Microsoft's bottom line pretty directly, Microsoft is not really the vendor and so in effect don't have as much control as Apple about the user experience or quality of goods (it doesn't help in this situation that Microsoft also has a monopoly on PC OS... another disconnect between sales and quality).

      In the case of phones, manufacturers then have to sell it via a carrier like Verizon or AT&T. These middlemen add their own markup, plans and specific customizations (one important such customization is the baseband firmware). So you can see how Android is suffering the same quality issues as Windows. Manufacturers and carriers have to compete with each other, and bundleware is one of those ways they see to compete and increase margins.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    2. Re:Annoying. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      This kind of crap automatically leaves me seriously considering an iPhone. Why in the hell is a company like Apple more successful in keeping bloatware off their phones? Why are Google and Microsoft incapable of demanding their products be free of this stuff? It's in their best interests.

      It's because Steve Jobs is an anal-retentive prick, and I mean that in the nicest possible way. He's been doing this for years. If it doesn't meet his approval, he'll throw things at you.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    3. Re:Annoying. by donatzsky · · Score: 1

      Actually, with Windows Phone 7 Microsoft has set a limit on the number of pre-installed apps (8 I believe) and they have to go through the same review process as any marketplace app.

  46. Bloatware is not a problem for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My phone is "dumb". It makes phone calls, sends simple text messages, and that's it. I grabbed a ringtone a long time ago, which was free. A few months ago, the phone lost even THAT. About the only thing the phone people won't do is steal your calls... ummm... nevermind. They control everything. So. Why bother putting any more of my precious time than necessary into these devices?

    Well... I guess this little rant just cycles back to the fact that being 42 years old, I'm young enough to be tech savvy, but too old to care about having apps on my phone.

    1. Re:Bloatware is not a problem for me by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I prefer not to pay for a separate GPS device, mp3 player, portable game machine, and video player.

  47. I know! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Funny

    My friend got an iPhones, and it had some stupid application for making phone calls! Phone calls! How 20th century! Who the heck does that anymore? Sheesh, I tells ya, sheesh!

    1. Re:I know! by hexadecimate · · Score: 1

      Not to worry. They removed that functionality in the lastest version.

    2. Re:I know! by hexadecimate · · Score: 1

      *latest*, dammit, LATEST.

      I'm drinking too much.

      Or maybe not enough.

    3. Re:I know! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Ha!

      It comes back if you move your hand, though, so, no, you can't remove it after all. ;-)

  48. 18 Billion (not US) Dollars by Imazalil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the article... "The record figure for a single month was reported as T$18 billion which is roughly $570 million for the month of April and thus reflects..."

    I'm guessing that's Taiwanese Dollars, not the US kind that Apple reports in. In USD it would make it about 1.7 billion per quarter to Apple's 10.

    Sorry to burst your bubble.

  49. Re:Synonyms by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

    Actually most of the newer Android hardware is faster than the early gen netbooks.

  50. Open vs. Closed by ceraphis · · Score: 1

    I still see the openness of android phones as a net plus compared to the general closed, unjailbroken iphone. It's up to the end user to figure out how to get the bloatware off. That said, companies are huge piles of cow crap for loading up phones of all things with this shit.

  51. Currency is important by Space+cowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From your own link

    The record figure for a single month was reported as T$18 billion which is roughly $570 million for the month of April

    $0.57B is waaay less than $10B/3...

    If you *really* want to see how Apple is blowing away the competition, look here for a graph of Apple profit vs the combination of {RIM, Motorola, Nokia, HTC, Sony Ericsson}... Now Samsung and LG aren't part of the group Apple is compared against on the graph, but when you're making huge amounts more *profit* (not revenue as you quote above) than a significant number of your competitors *combined*, you're doing something right.

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Currency is important by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      If you mean making people pay obscenely high markups then you would be correct.

      It give Apple an incredible amount of leverage, if someone comes into the market who puts enough pressure on apple they can just drop the price some and still make profit. It is a great business strategy since people are basically paying early adopter prices for the entire life cycle of a product.

      I don't like Apple, their products, or their philosophy but as a company they are doing things right.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    2. Re:Currency is important by MogNuts · · Score: 1

      Who cares. Does Apple share all that extra revenue with you and put it in your pocket?

      No.

      I'm going to buy then the best phone, not the one with the most sales.

    3. Re:Currency is important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like Hitler, his reich or his murdering, but as a fascist dictatorship bent on world domination, he was doing things right. The most "successful" company does not relieve its social contract to not fuck the people who deal with it. The "free market" doesn't work well because there's no real penalty for being an asshole when you hold near or total monopoly status, through patents and otherwise.

  52. Now see, this is interesting... by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

    Because as an iPad/iPhone user I recognize that the apps I have generally get replaced by other Apps and I hate that I can't get rid of them. But I recognize that with the apps that are installed, they are quality apps. They are tight applications that do what they are supposed to and nothing more and they don't look like a 4th grader wrote the interface for them. I also recognize that Apple is removing these apps and getting out of the way of the user. I suspect in a near future version of the OS we will at least see the ability to hide, if not delete, those apps that we don't need because we've replaced (such as buying a more powerful calculator than the one installed).

  53. Malware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Malware is usually software that does something the user does not want. Therefore, if the user wants to remove some software, and it can't be removed, then that software qualifies as malware, right?

    1. Re:Malware? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Malware is usually software that does something the user does not want. Therefore, if the user wants to remove some software, and it can't be removed, then that software qualifies as malware, right?

      Nice try, but malware is software that is harmful.
      The software that prevents you from counterfeiting moneys (be it in photoshop, or on your scanner itself) is obviously not malware.

    2. Re:Malware? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Sure it is, I want that feature this deprives me of it. I should be free to counterfeit as much as I like, spending that money should sure as hell be a crime though.

    3. Re:Malware? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Actually, no.
      Counterfeiting - whether or not you spend it - is illegal in and of itself.

    4. Re:Malware? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How sad.

  54. Even More Plus by tepples · · Score: 1

    So long as I continue to buy unlocked I have a true unlimited plan for as long as I feel like sticking with AT&T

    But you're paying the same price for phone service as someone who keeps getting a new subsidized feature phone every 2 years. Unlike T-Mobile's rate structure, AT&T doesn't give you a $10 (voice) or $20 (voice+data) per month discount on your phone bill for bringing your own phone. And buying direct from the manufacturer doesn't give you a chance to try the phone in person.

    As LTE gains traction for 4g it may eventually be possible to buy an unlocked phone that works on all 4 carriers

    Sprint uses WiMAX, not LTE. Besides, each LTE carrier will still use a different band.

    1. Re:Even More Plus by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      I'm actually paying less right now as I'm on a family plan and my part of it is only costing $50 a month.

      Sprint has actually been talking of going to LTE, the bands issue is quite likely true and why I'm not holding my breath. My hope is that as phone chipsets become more advanced multi-band hardware will become common that will work on multiple carriers here. Living in the US I gaze enviously overseas at systems where you can buy the phone you want and then go pick a carrier without having to worry that the phone will be incompatible with the chosen carrier.

    2. Re:Even More Plus by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      In Britain, Orange and T-Mobile use a different GSM band from O2 and Vodafone, but all the phones on the market support both bands.

  55. No unremoveable software on the iPhone? by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

    Bringing the conversation all the way back around: no bloatware on the iPhone.

    Are you saying there are no pre-installed apps on the iPhone that can't be removed?

    1. Re:No unremoveable software on the iPhone? by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      They are certainly there, but for the most part the apps are access to phone functionality (camera, photos, ipod, phone, safari, settings, contacts, messagine) or are basic features that most phones have (calendar, calculator, email). There are a couple that are perhaps superfluous (YouTube, maps, stocks and weather) but that's it, and they're not swamped with corporate branding (i.e. glorified ads).

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    2. Re:No unremoveable software on the iPhone? by PeanutButterBreath · · Score: 1

      If you don't want/need/use them, and you can't get rid of them, how are they not bloat/crap/shovel- ware?

  56. It's your phone by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

    It's your phone and you can do what you like with it, so the Android owners keep telling you. It's also the networks phone it seems and if their money making plans conflict with your phone's capabilities then the OEM will comply and bugger it up for you.

    It's been a problem for years, only Apple seem to say 'no' to such things.

  57. Not starting a license debate/war by rattaroaz · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to remind you of the differences between open and free. Android is Apache license. It IS open source, and if that is what you mean by "open," then yes it is. Is is not "free" because the Apache license is not copyleft, and so it does not protect your freedom (I don't think Google ever claimed it did. They only claimed it was good for the handset manufacturers. I could be wrong here though). I am not saying, in this post, that one licence is better than the other, so I am not starting another flame war. I am just stating that, yes, Android is open source, and no, it is not free. I think we just need to understand our terms better. Is Android open source better than iphone complete proprietary? That is another question for another post.

    1. Re:Not starting a license debate/war by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are trying to start a license debate / war. The Free Software Foundation regards the Apache license as a Free Software license compatible with version 3 of the GPL. It is free and open. Free does not mean copyleft - copyleft means copyleft. Free (in the FSF sense), means granting the person receiving the code the four freedoms that the FSF outlines, and the Apache license does, indeed, provide these freedoms.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Not starting a license debate/war by rattaroaz · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are trying to start a license debate / war.

      Really? What side am I on? I clearly stated "I am not saying, in this post, that one licence is better than the other . . .," so starting a war without choosing a side seems a little unusual. Please do not see malice where the intention is to educate.

      The Free Software Foundation regards the Apache license as a Free Software license compatible with version 3 of the GPL. It is free and open. Free does not mean copyleft - copyleft means copyleft. Free (in the FSF sense), means granting the person receiving the code the four freedoms that the FSF outlines, and the Apache license does, indeed, provide these freedoms.

      You are confusing FSF with OSI. RMS often tries to be clear that he represents Free software, and NOT open source. Different camp. FSF represents Free software and the GPL only. OSI represents open source, of which GPL is one license in the group. GNU code is only under GPL/LGPL. They do mention compatibility, because they understand they are part of a bigger world.

      In a nutshell, Apache, among other noncopyleft licenses, allows for freedom. Copyleft licenses protect freedom. Which is better, obviously depends upon your beliefs and goals, but that is the fundamental difference. Further argument/debate/war is like saying apples taste better than oranges. Personal preference.

      I don't blame you for confusing the issue, as it is a common thing. Marketing people are intentionally trying to mess the words up, and are doing a good job. It is open, but you have to jailbreak it first. Well, that may be true, but it certainly violates the connotation, even if it follows the denotation. That was my point above.

    3. Re:Not starting a license debate/war by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You are confusing FSF with OSI.

      No I'm not. Seriously, read the FSF's site. First, read the Free Software Definition. Note how every requirement that it lists is met by the Apache license. Now read the FSF's opinion of the Apache 2 license - in case you are too lazy to click on a link, they say:

      This is a free software license, compatible with version 3 of the GPL.

      Please stop misrepresenting the Free Software Foundation's views. Especially stop nonsense like this:

      FSF represents Free software and the GPL only.

      The FSF represents Free Software only, and encourages people to use the GPL. They also support other licenses. I maintain a GNU (FSF-backed) project that is released under the MIT license, and I regularly contribute to another that is LGPL'd.

      I don't blame you for confusing the issue, as it is a common thing.

      When everyone except for you appears to be misinterpreting something, it's worth checking if you are the one with the misunderstanding...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  58. Begun to complain? by Markos · · Score: 1

    Points to a thread where 20 people have posted, and not even all of them are complaining. Clearly this is a huge problem of epic proportions.

  59. Close. by garote · · Score: 1

    "Because with [Linux platform], you can do whatever you want!"

    The more appropriate phrase to describe this phenomenon is,

    "Because with [Linux platform], you're allowed to do whatever you can!"

    Ego, YMMV.

  60. true dat by Eggbloke · · Score: 1

    My phone (A Samsung GT-I5700) came with Facebook and Myspace. Not only can I not remove these; I cannot update them either so I am forced to download a newer version of Facebook despite another version being already installed on my phone. I bought the phone thinking that it was open but it really isn't. I am looking to root but the drivers wont work.

    --
    I care not for your karma and your mod points.
  61. haharhrrrrrghh!! by garote · · Score: 1

    I just HATE THAT ICON SO MUCH, sitting there, NOT RUNNING, stuck in the last slot of the last page of my pristine app collection, taking up VALUABLE SPACE in the non-user-accessible partition of my storage media, CURSE YOU Apple this is a DEAL BREAKER!!!

    [gunshots, sirens]

    1. Re:haharhrrrrrghh!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have no idea what you're talking about, but whatever it is, it's not what anyone else is talking about.

      The iPhone simply won't run until synced with iTunes. Seriously, it displays an image showing the USB cable and the iTunes icon when turned on out of the box. Until you sync with iTunes, the phone is completely useless. (Same thing after a hardware reset.)

      Which is completely retarded, because it already has your phone number and subscriber information since it's on the fucking SIM card! There's absolutely no reason to require iTunes at all, but they do. Why? To force you to install Apple's bloat-ware on your computer.

      Fun fact: iTunes for Windows comes with a descent chunk of Mac OS X ported to Windows since they're too lazy to make a proper Windows application. But, apparently, not too lazy to port part of Cocoa to Windows.

  62. Nonroot solution by mu51c10rd · · Score: 1

    People can just install Advance Task Killer or some such thing and kill the processes. That always worked for me. You can even kill the ATK process. I know the point is not to have any of this bloat in the first place, but this seems like a fairly easy fix.

  63. The worst is demo software... by cr42yr1ch · · Score: 1

    My Tattoo came with two pieces of demo software preinstalled. They are great fun; they ran 5 times, ran out of demo time and now sit clogging up my memory...

  64. True data coverage about the same, but CDMA poor by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    And have no 3G data service in a shockingly large part of America that isn't even particularly rural

    If you compare coverage maps from AT&T of ALL data (Edge + 3G) vs. Verizon data, there's not that much of a difference - even in places like Utah or Nevada (the real outliers).

    I've been all over Utah for example, and you can get data on AT&T in more places than you'd think, even well off I-70.

    But the real issue with any CDMA phone is, that you are simply screwed for international travel. I can play AT&T $20 for 20 MB of international roaming. That may not seem like much but I was able to make that amount last over a few weeks in the UK with occasional use of maps (mostly used an offline mapping program for driving directions) and some email. And in am emergency of course you can throw caution to the wind and use as much voice or data as you like - while your Verizon phone would be sitting dead.

    Rumors are that Apple is working with Broadcom to have a single chip that would work on both networks - that would be really nice, and would make owning a Verizon phone more practical for people that travel.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  65. Are there revenue figures for bloatware? by swb · · Score: 1

    I've had an iPhone for too long now to clearly remember, but my last Verizon phone had a ton of bloatware.

    It seemed like it was designed to generate revenue in three ways:

    1) Subscription fees for Verizon services
    2) Purchase fees for Verizon products (ringtones, etc)
    3) Service fees for network services you don't have a good/any plan for (eg, data).

    Does anyone know what kind of revenue the carriers actually make from this? Is it substantial, or are they merely doing it thinking that if they do, they'll be the next Apple or control the "market"?

    1. Re:Are there revenue figures for bloatware? by yuna49 · · Score: 1

      Ringtones are in decline, but full-track downloads for cell phone use now constitute billions of dollars in revenues.

      "Juniper Research's latest report argues that a sharp fall in ringtone revenues will be more than offset by growth in full-track downloads, streamed music services and ringback tones. As a matter of fact, the research company forecasts that global revenues from mobile music services will reach nearly $14.6 billion by 2013."

      See: http://www.intomobile.com/2009/02/27/juniper-research-ringtone-sales-may-go-down-but-mobile-music-revenues-are-set-to-reach-146-billion-by-2013/

  66. Buy unsubsidized by iampiti · · Score: 1

    I know this doesn't work in the US but the solution is buying the phones unsubsidized directly from the manufacturers. In Europe is not that uncommon and many carriers have cheaper rates if you bring your unlocked phone. It ends up saving you money in the long run.
    Anyway, for some models that might not even be possible in the US. In this case I really like the european model better

  67. different narrative by sweatyboatman · · Score: 1

    Apple went to Verizon first. Verizon said "We'll give you the same cut as we give everyone else" and Jobs said no and went to AT&T who basically gave away the farm to get the iPhone.

    the biggest reason there is no Verizon or Spring iPhone right now is that Apple wants more money than either is willing to give. And meanwhile, Apple can continue to demand concessions from AT&T, keeping them cowering in fear of losing that exclusive status.

    it's a very cushy situation for Apple, but it has nothing to do with this article.

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
  68. This has nothing to do with Android by Raul+Acevedo · · Score: 1

    This article is pure Android FUD, carriers have been stuffing phones with useless and unremovable crapware forever, regardless of the OS. Apple is the only phone manufacturer (at least of smart phones) that has managed to avoid this.

    --
    In a real emergency, we would have all fled in terror, and you would not have been notified.
  69. shock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    problems found in an iPhone knock-off!?! say it ain't so!

  70. The true reason. Google's Nexus One failed by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Carriers refused to discount their data plans if you brought you own phone.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  71. "a curated platform" by riegel · · Score: 1

    Which curated platform would you like today Apple iPhone or google Android?

    --
    http://p8ste.com - Web based Clipboard
  72. And this is the problem with how most people buy t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is the problem with how most people buy their phones. Why would you possibly want to buy your phone from your carrier? I have a carrier that I am happy with and the boss pays for and I buy handsets as they go in and out of fashion.

    If you wish to pay your phone off over the space of 24 months, put it on a CC and pay it off a dollar a day.

    Only selling phones on a plan/contract is called 3rd line forcing and is illegal here in Australia. That is why Apple decided to sell the phone through their retail outlets here.

  73. Not just android by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every cellphone I have ever purchased came with pre-installed crap that couldn't be removed. Stupid "demos" of apps with no means of removing the clutter. So, once more consumers show their ignorance by bitching about one thing whilst ignoring the bigger problem.

  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. Citation please by snowwrestler · · Score: 0

    You can develop and distribute apps without begging for permission, and Google specifically makes it easy to unlock the N1's bootloader (and void your warranty, yes), while Apple considers you to be a criminal if you jailbreak.

    I've never seen a statement from Apple that it considers customers who jailbreak their own iPhones to be criminals. If they have, let me know and I'll be educated.

    As far as I know both Apple and Google take the same approach to users who root their own phones: "we won't honor the warranty on it."

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Citation please by victorhooi · · Score: 1

      heya,

      Err, yeah they have.

      E.g., I point you to the post above from bonkedproducer, who helpfully cited three articles:

      "Apple Claims Jailbreaking will Destroy Cell Towers" - ZDNet [zdnet.com]
      "Apple: Jailbreaking encourages cell tower terrorism, 'catastrophic results'" - Engadget [engadget.com]
      "Apple also claimed that jailbreaking would pave the way for hackers to alter the Exclusive Chip Identification number that identified the phone to the cell tower, which could enable calls to be made anonymously. Apple said “this would be desirable to drug dealers.”"Wired - Threat Level [wired.com]

      And Google (at least HTC) have a policy of honouring the warranty even if you do root it, anyway:

      Cheers,
      Victor

  76. Crapps by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I believe the proper term for "crapware" is "crapps".

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  77. Place the blame where it belongs by agent_vee · · Score: 1

    Why blame Android for something the Carriers are doing? It's like being locked out of your apartment and blaming the construction company when it was the landlord that changed the locks and didn't give you the key.

  78. Optus Bloat by fuscus2010 · · Score: 1

    My Sony Ericsson Xperria come with five pages of preinstalled software ( from the Australian Carrier OPTUS) that can not be removed by the sucker - sorry - end-user. About half a page is use-full and the rest is either crap or designed to increase your phone bill ( why would I view youtube on the phone when I have a PC with twin 23-inch screens). Rooting the phone hass been on my todo list for a while ( if you forgive the pun). Thanks OP, looks like tonights the night.

  79. depends on what is important to you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ran it for years. No firewall, no antivirus, no hunting down some video driver or sound card driver. Every single one of my PC/windows using friends got pwned at least once, had borked systems with bad drivers, had to reinstall multiple times, etc. I never had any trouble with that, and once you understood extensions and sets and how to allocate memory, even that wasn't a hassle and it made the machine work perfectly fine, including multitasking.

    So, it depends on what you mean as superior or not.

    Note, I don't run osx, if I am going to run a unixy thing it will be free, and in cheap hardware, but classic had a lot going for it over peecees and windows, at least in some important ways. Heck, I still see computer shops all over advertsing "clean up your computer", meaning your generic windows install, for like 79 dollars. 2010 and joe consumer still cannot keep their windows machines clean, despite firewalls, anti virus, advice from friends, and a small fraction of one percent of windows uber nerds who hoot at them and call them names because they get compromised. Hooting at non technical experts is not a substitute for better quality software that doesn't need outside vendors products to be functional, nor an advanced degree of computer savvy.

    Mac has always been about offering something that just worked with minimal hassle for most people, not just for computer ultra enthusiasts and professionals, in that, they have succeeded. I still won't buy them now, way too expensive and I can get by without the hand holding, but for millions of people it does work out better, as it did during the classic years as well.

    For every one windows user who can actually avoid becoming part of a botnet or who can do advanced tweaking, there are 999 who can't, so you need to look at the total market, not just your own anecedotal leetness.

    Macs back then suffered from insane retail policies that limited their market severely, Jobs turned that around, he groks how to sell now, that's why they are doing better (with now a larger market cap than microsoft). You need both a quality product, plus know how to sell. One or the other won't work near as good as both simultaneously.

    1. Re:depends on what is important to you by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Oh look, a 1980s Mac vs PC debate. I had a platform that could both pre-emptively multitask, and didn't have faff with drivers etc.

  80. I dunno about you guys but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My htc hero came with no bloatware. WIN! I bought it on the meteor network in ireland and thank god there is no meteor branding or any of that junk on it!! Wooo!

  81. more beer * by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what can i say?
    putting a microwave oven to your head either makes you dumb
    or a rotten apple.
    (*) brain-cells

  82. Bloatware by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    "Bloatware (or, to use the more kind euphemism, 'Pre-installed software' that the computer manufacturer gets paid to include on a new PC)."

    That's crapware. Bloatware is any software that's deemed by the /. crowd to take up too much disk/RAM/CPU time for what it does (mostly by using a runtime environment the slashdotter calling it bloatware doesn't like, such as Java or Mono or The Other Desktop's core libraries) but in some extreme cases using X11 at all, or even failure to be written in hand-tuned assembly are sufficient to earn the title "bloatware".

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  83. And the Android Market is bugged! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    The Android Market keeps telling me I should update "Facebook" - but I don't have Facebook installed! Its preinstalled!

    I have to disable notifications not to constantly get bugged by this, and that means I'm not getting notifications for any of the apps I do in fact have installed!

    Google seems to store this information in some secret cloud, because we can't log into this from a PC webbrowser and audit what they think we have on the phone - we are just screwed.

    Bloody screw up google!
    (Which as usual, you can't get in touch with!)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  84. Um. (was: Re:Currency is important) by jthill · · Score: 1

    Apple's pulling down 2x the handset profits of all its competitors combined this year, and the article uses the word "shocking", ... but not for that stat. They use the word "shocking" for this one:

    And now consider the next shocking chart. Apple will generate 2X as much handset profit as the rest of the industry combined this year DESPITE SELLING ONLY 3% OF THE HANDSETS BY UNIT VOLUME:

    --
    As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
  85. Nexus one.... by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

    Which is why I bought my phone direct, bypassing a carrier. Can't tell me not to tether, can't force shitty software on me, can't shove ads in every orifice...

    --
    93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
  86. Nokia N800 or N850 or N900 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmmmm
    Nokia N900 can u put Android on that. I though Maemo could run Android. I don't have one (and I miss my N800 so much) but I love the N900 just to broke to get a new phone. Oh and yea the N900 is not 3G or 4G (but it is WIFI). Oh well just a thought........

    btw been so long I forgot my sign-in

    It used to be 8BitMe but that was 5 years back :(

  87. speaking as an Android TABLET owner by alizard · · Score: 1

    works just fine and I didn't build it, I bought it direct from a Chinese vendor. Hopefully, I'll be able to write scripts that'll run on it.

    1. Re:speaking as an Android TABLET owner by dissy · · Score: 0

      speaking as an Android TABLET owner
      works just fine and I didn't build it, I bought it direct from a Chinese vendor. Hopefully, I'll be able to write scripts that'll run on it.

      heh, way to ruin my point by reminding me of the tablets ;}

      Seriously thou, yea I sorta forgot about those and was fixated on the phones made to run it.

      I take it the tablet runs the stock Android build? (Or at least could.. why lock a tablets bootloader after all?)
      I'd imagine without having a cellular carrier involved would make that not only possible, but likely.

      As a matter of fact, earlier this year there was a project to get Android to compile for x86. I am unsure on its current status, but it's only a matter of time until it is working. That platform too would be open and let one run Android without these problems too.

    2. Re:speaking as an Android TABLET owner by dissy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I hate replying to myself, but I just found said project, which now appears to be a LiveCD.

      http://code.google.com/p/live-android/

  88. A lot of false whining in this thread. by earlymon · · Score: 1

    When you root your Android phone, you can remove any bundleware (great term, thanks!) you want - but moreover, you can change the desktop (launcher) itself, you can go with kernel variations.

    Everyone's talking about root like it's something goofy.

    It's simple: it's superuser (Administrator to Windows-only users) access.

    You can plug your phone in to a Linux/Mac/Win machine via USB and access whatever you want via a command line.

    The way God intended.

    You can pay Sprint for the privilege of wifi tethering, per month - or you can root and do it yourself.

    You can buy a backup application - or you can use the command line and do it yourself.

    There are a few Androids that you can't do this with - such as the Droid X, where you can root it, but you can't replace the rom image.

    Otherwise, if any of you are the least bit knowledgeable of why preemptive multi-tasking with superuser control of your device is a good thing, then you want Android.

    It's just that simple.

    And no - task killers are sufficient for bundleware and neither do they innocently sit quiescent doing nothing. The Sprint crap on the EVO - as well that most popular malware, Facebook - and that Amazon MP3 store thing - were constantly waking up.

    And given that these phones use scalable processors whose actual CPU speed varies based on load and number of apps being serviced, yes, they do impact battery life.

    And the rm command is alive and well.

    OBTW - they say rooting voids your warranty. yeah. big deal. you can remove your root access and leave no trace.

    With iOS, you violate your TOS and you jailbreak. With Android, you gain superuser (root) access.

    Words mean things. /rant.

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  89. Thanks by rattaroaz · · Score: 1

    The FSF represents Free Software only, and encourages people to use the GPL.

    I think that is more accurate than my comment. I would agree. I'll reevaluate the issue, as I always have something to learn, but I still think my original comment about Android being open, but not free (as in hackable without jailbreaking) is still true. It IS open, but it is not modifiable. Thanks again.

    Free vs Open Source

  90. On WebOS... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    ...there's a patch for that!

    Android may be open source, and WebOS closed, but WebOS remains the most open phone platform in existence. You can remove the bloatware apps pretty easily, or if you prefer, just hide them by changing a simple text file.

  91. Root your phone if you want to customize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Root your phone
    2) Remove "bloatware"
    3) Profit

    Obviously, any computing device is going to come with some preset software that may fit the majority of users needs, but which may also be useless to some of the user base.
    Windows itself contains piles of crap that it not needed by many users. WinLite is a great way to work around this.
    Likewise, if you buy a computer from an OEM it will unavoidably be preloaded with lots of crap.
    This is not news.

  92. k3w1, thanks by alizard · · Score: 1

    Having an iteration on the desktop might be helpful ... I presume it'll work just fine in Virtualbox.

  93. Re:True data coverage about the same, but CDMA poo by jschottm · · Score: 1

    But the real issue with any CDMA phone is, that you are simply screwed for international travel.

    FYI, there's a few CDMA phones from RIM and HTC that GSM capability as well.

  94. FUD. by garote · · Score: 1

    Oh, you're referring to iTunes on the Mac/PC, Mr. Coward? I figured you were referring to the iTunes app on the phone itself. It's actually easy to get an iPhone without the Mac/PC iTunes. You can do your initial sync with a computer at the apple store, with a salesman standing right there guiding you through it. Same deal with the iPad. Past that, you do not need to use iTunes EVER AGAIN.

    If you want to get pathological about it, then configure your email manually, and mail yourself your contacts in .vcf and fill your address book that way. Then get Pandora from the app store and listen to music that way. Then get netflix or hulu for your movie needs.

    And I hate to break it to you, pal, but there is no bloatware being installed by the initial sync to iTunes. Those apps are embedded in the firmware. Your premise is invalid.

    Personally, I don't consider iTunes "bloatware" because to me, it serves only two purposes:
    1. It's a media repository, and
    2. It's a method for syncing that media to my phone.

    I would consider it bloatware if it also contained, for example, a paint program, a word processor, a punch-the-monkey game, or a social networking "chat service". Hell, you want bloatware? Go to facebook. It's got all of those hogtied together.

    Also, your "fun fact" has no relevance.

  95. Re:Synonyms by byisk · · Score: 1

    And what is about Adobe Reader? Is it a bloatware, too? I buy computers without operation system and then install Linux, but my friends prefer to choose computers with Windows and some additional software (such as Adobe Reader) pre-installed. It is a really slow piece of software if you check it against Evince from Gnome. Also, I've heard a lot about Reader's security problems. Adobe has recently announced that they're going to create a sandbox mechanism inside of Reader, so it will become even more slower for sure!

    --
    Do not forget to check out my blog.