Slashdot Mirror


Bookmark Synchronizer Xmarks Hangs Up Their Hats

krulgar writes "On January 10, 2011, Xmarks will be closing their doors. A free service being replaced by free software. It would still be nice to have a single way to keep my bookmarks from my work machine in sync with my home machines and my mobile devices without exerting much effort. Xmarks seemed to be the only ones with that clear vision, maybe the replacement tools can grow into this space, but it's still a little sad to see a useful tool wave goodbye."

225 comments

  1. Fare Thee Well... by tangelogee · · Score: 1

    I for one will definitely miss the cross-platform availability of xmarks.

    1. Re:Fare Thee Well... by synthparadox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree. The alternatives there provide sync across computers but only for the same browser. I use both Chrome and Firefox extensively and I will greatly miss the ability for (fo)Xmarks to sync my bookmarks, passwords and tabs across all my browsers, regardless of whether its Chrome/Firefox.

      For now, I'm using Firefox sync as my primary syncing mechanism and importing into Chrome whenever I update something in Firefox. Its somewhat annoying, but I guess I'll deal. Maybe I'll switch back to using primarily Firefox.

    2. Re:Fare Thee Well... by sunking2 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But not enough to give them money.

    3. Re:Fare Thee Well... by tangelogee · · Score: 1

      But not enough to give them money.

      I would have gladly given them money. There is, however, no easy way to do this from their site.

    4. Re:Fare Thee Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try SyncPlaces

    5. Re:Fare Thee Well... by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, there is no version for chrome

      --
      -- dnl
    6. Re:Fare Thee Well... by c0d3g33k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So write one. SyncPlaces uses standard protocols for communication and standard file/data formats for storage. It should be easy enough to handle the chrome bookmarks in the same way. And you can use your own server, so your bookmarks are yours alone and private, and won't go away just because somebody shut down their free service.

    7. Re:Fare Thee Well... by theaveng · · Score: 1

      I use "Opera Link" in the Opera browser.
      It provides web-based access so you can use the bookmarks in Firefox and IE and other browsers. Nice innovation. Also good if your PC dies so you don't lose all your links.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    8. Re:Fare Thee Well... by danieltdp · · Score: 1, Troll

      Nice idea. Like if every slashdotter had infine time and resources to do anything that is doable.

      --
      -- dnl
    9. Re:Fare Thee Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +(n+1)

    10. Re:Fare Thee Well... by partyguerrilla · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it backs up all your notes and speed dial.

    11. Re:Fare Thee Well... by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      I'll second this.

      I used Opera Link at home to copy-over all my Firefox bookmarks, and now I can access them from work as needed.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    12. Re:Fare Thee Well... by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

      Not really the point. I don't have time either, but I don't use Chrome so porting SyncPlaces would do me no good. The SyncPlaces author probably doesn't have time since he's, well, already busy with SyncPlaces. And my comment wasn't targeted at *you* alone, though it comes across that way - better to maintain the conversational tone in these discussion threads, I suppose.

      The real point is that the building blocks already exist, are freely available standards, and a working example already exists to provide a design target. Somebody (or group of somebodies) out there with the time and resources (and Chrome knowledge) could put together a SyncPlaces compatible Chrome implementation without too much effort, I would think. Maybe the missing element is a way to connect those folks with people who desire such a tool (such as yourself) and might be willing to donate as a way of providing motivation.

    13. Re:Fare Thee Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that this is not 4chan, right? Your posts don't disappear after some amount of time, so you really need to stop spreading lies.

      I've been out of work for nearly 2 years.

      Disregard that, I do have a job.

      Disregard both, I've been unemployed since mid-2009 (little over 1 year).

      And now once more you are claiming that you are, in fact, employed. So which is it?

  2. Overkill? by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Seems like an external server would be overkill for such a simple task. And think of the opportunities they for data mining. Xmarks can and should be replaced by a very small shell script.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Overkill? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Seems like an external server would be overkill for such a simple task. And think of the opportunities they for data mining. Xmarks can and should be replaced by a very small shell script.

      A couple disparate thoughts...

      - At least on Firefox, you could use your own server for XMarks synch storage. I haven't used XMarks in a while; but if this option is still available, then it should keep working for you - as long as the existing plugin works with future iterations of Firefox.

      - At least on Firefox, your bookmarks are no longer saved as a simple file. As such, a "very small shell script" would not do the same job. At the least, you'll have to learn how to script sqlite in order to do this - and that's just to support Firefox. I'm a bit surprised someone who knows how to write a shell script apparently doesn't realize that different browsers handle bookmarks differently.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that help if the shell script is at home and I want to synchronize bookmarks at work?

    3. Re:Overkill? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I actually don't use bookmarks. Last I checked they were just stored in a simple HTML file. But, that shouldn't pose a problem. You can script sqlite from the command line. Still no reason to go full client/server.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Overkill? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      That's what SSH is for. You act like people never ran shell scripts remotely before.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Overkill? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

      think of the opportunities they for data mining.

      Someday when I grow up I want to be fucking evil like you.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    6. Re:Overkill? by oneplus999 · · Score: 4, Informative

      At least on Firefox, your bookmarks are no longer saved as a simple file. As such, a "very small shell script" would not do the same job.

      go to about:config, change browser.bookmarks.autoExportHTML to true.

    7. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because everyone has access to a shell. You're still essentially running a client/server model if you're doing that, except you're just serving the capability of running the script remotely. Might as well run an FTP

    8. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds nice.
      If it is sooo easy to do this with a shell script, please help me make one which will
      sync my booksmarks on my Samsung Jet with all my PCs running Windows, Linux and even some Macs.

      Do I have to say any more?

    9. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the open source mentality you're fighting. It requires rationalizing configuration and user interface problems with an elitist and condescending attitude.

      It's homegrown, and there might be something better and faster out there, but it's homegrown and that's what's important.

      I go the bathroom at home too, and that gets flushed down the toilet.

    10. Re:Overkill? by sleepy_weasel · · Score: 1

      That's why I didn't like the service. I didn't need their "Smart Search" or "website rating", or even their "site info"... I just needed my bookmarks backed up. When Google backup stopped working, I used foxmarks, then xmarks (which was doing 'data aggregation') of all the bookmarks. data aggregation= data mining

      --
      It's all damned lies and statistics!! I mean 47% of all people use statistics to back up their arguments.
    11. Re:Overkill? by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      I've used that ever since Netscape (whatever it's called now) stopped saving bookmarks in html by default (I've used the bookmarks.html file as my home page for about 15 years)...

      However, autoExportHTML is horribly implemented. It should auto-export ANY time there is a bookmarks change, not just at shutdown. I don't shut down firefox, essentially ever--it crashes, I have to kill it forcibly, system crashes, etc., otherwise it is always running. So autoExportHTML is almost useless to me...

    12. Re:Overkill? by ihatejobs · · Score: 1

      Easy to do if you put your mind to it, but it is a lot easier to bitch and complain on an internet message board instead isn't it?

      --
      Can anyone tell me why 99% of /. users are total assclowns?
    13. Re:Overkill? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Shells are free. Everyone should have access to a shell. Running your own SSH server has significant advantages over using Xmarks (no data mining), and it's far more secure than FTP (plain text passwords!).

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    14. Re:Overkill? by crashandburn66 · · Score: 1

      Xmarks can and should be replaced by a very small shell script.

      Of course, because every end-user totally has the know-how and desire to write and operate a shell script to sync their bookmarks. Not everyone is like us. Most people just want their software to work with minimal hassle and tinkering.

      I liked Xmarks because it was easy to use and had features that nobody else had. Hopefully they'll open-source their code before they go under, so somebody else can pick up where they left off. If not, I may just end up firing up an Xmarks server of my own to sync my bookmarks to.

    15. Re:Overkill? by Straterra · · Score: 1

      I created an Xmarks backup environment at work for people. It's a simple PHP scripts with some Apache httpd .htaccess goodness. Xmarks can use webdav over https (which is what I do). Each user only has access to their specific bookmarks and this has worked fine. Guess I'm going to have to come up with another solution now.

    16. Re:Overkill? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      It sounds like what you want is FEBE to make sure you don't lose anything in case FF crashes. You can set it to backup as many times as you want, and it'll back up HTML bookmarks as well as the sqlite way. It sounds like just what you are looking for.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    17. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's great about open source solutions is that they can be delivered for free with an easy-to-use installation package for the less tech-savvy people. I will admit that non-free solutions beat open source in marketing and making the user interface shiny and cool.

    18. Re:Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, really easy...

      Maybe if I had a open OS on my cell phone but with the default software you can only directly access the phones internal space and copy the files which are still in some cryptic format.

      So, if it is so easy as Hatta says I really like to see how he will do it.
      Cause I cant and everybody I spoke to cant either.

    19. Re:Overkill? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      the conversion from places to html is lossy

    20. Re:Overkill? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You have to think like the criminals to catch them. Anyone else find it ironic to visit shutupwomangetonmyhorse.com and be asked to provide an email address because they "hate spambots"? My email address in such a situation is fuckyourmom@yourhouse.com...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  3. I LOVED this tool by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 1

    I REALLY loved Xmarks. It was so convenient across my 3 computers.

    Was it freeware or did they ask for a donation? I never saw any messages about donating but if I knew they were in trouble I would have give some money. This stinks. Hopefully someone will take over.

    This should be a feature built into every web browser anyways. Doesn't Chrome have this built in?

    1. Re:I LOVED this tool by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, non-cross browser replacements are listed on the Xmarks website. I've already replaced it with Firefox Sync on two of my PCs..

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    2. Re:I LOVED this tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Yeah. Yes. No. Me either. Me too. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Not sure.

    3. Re:I LOVED this tool by rwven · · Score: 1

      Truly a tragedy. I've been a huge proponent of Xmarks for a while now, and I was anxiously awaiting their android release :-/

    4. Re:I LOVED this tool by Martz · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to delete your Xmarks account by logging into the website and choosing My Account > Delete Account.

      I removed the xmarks extension from my browsers, and then wondered what would happen to my data. I can only assume it's gone now.

      In this day and age it's easy to litter the 'net with personal information.

    5. Re:I LOVED this tool by ihatejobs · · Score: 1

      Chrome, FF and IE are all capable of syncing your bookmarks. The only reason to use xmarks was to sync cross browser.

      --
      Can anyone tell me why 99% of /. users are total assclowns?
    6. Re:I LOVED this tool by SlaveToSoftware · · Score: 1

      Read the article, they were free and trying to monetize the collected bookmark data. A number of responses to the blog post suggest willingness to pay... but they never approached the users before deciding to close up shop. A shame.

      Firefox 4 comes with one built in, there's an extension for Firefox 3:

      http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/What+is+Firefox+Sync

      I'll use it, but not being cross browser may leave some people without a good option.

  4. Delicious by snookerhog · · Score: 3, Insightful
    delicious.com solved this for me a long time ago.

    What did Xmarks do that delicious does not?

    1. Re:Delicious by Snowblindeye · · Score: 1

      delicious.com solved this for me a long time ago.

      What did Xmarks do that delicious does not?

      I'm not familiar with the details of delicious.com, but Xmarks syncs your bookmarks, history, open tabs and passwords across multiple browsers. I find the password sync in particular to be invaluable, but you can disable each of the four options depending on your preference. I'll miss them.

    2. Re:Delicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      For one, Xmarks synchronizes not just bookmarks. They synchronized passwords, history and tabs too, if the user enabled such options. If you are as paranoid about privacy as must /. users, you could use your own server.

      But it doesn't matter. Firefox Sync is built in to Firefox 4, and it does all that too.

    3. Re:Delicious by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      delicious.com solved this for me a long time ago.

      What did Xmarks do that delicious does not?

      Having to go to a particular web site to find a link is not nearly the same thing as synching your bookmarks across computers.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Delicious by kikito · · Score: 1

      It has plugins for all major browsers. You don't have to go to any site.

    5. Re:Delicious by jbarr · · Score: 1

      For me, Firefox Sync (formerly Weave) is a completely viable solution. But one thing that Xmarks has that Firefox Sync does not offer is Web-based access to the saved bookmarks. Just last night, I was at a relative's house, and used Xmarks' Web site to go to a link I had saved. I'm sure Firefox Sync could implement the same at some point, but with that minor exception, Firefox Sync performs just as well as Xmarks.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    6. Re:Delicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox Sync is built in to Firefox 4, and it does all that too.

      Yeah, it's just too bad that FF4 is a stillborn, steaming pile of shit.

    7. Re:Delicious by Americano · · Score: 1

      del.icio.us has plugins for most (all?) major browsers, and syncs bookmarks just fine, last I checked.

      It does not, at last check, do all the password/history/tab syncing xmarks did.

      If you need a bookmark-only solution, del.icio.us works all right.

    8. Re:Delicious by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Firefox Sync presumably only works with Firefox. Xmarks was great because it worked with a handful of different browsers over a handful of different platforms. Every once in a while I need IE for something and it's really nice to have access to my main bookmarks from there as well.

    9. Re:Delicious by Kalidor · · Score: 1

      As a stopgap measure you could setup your FF to auto-export bookmarks to an html file and build a script to periodically update it to a personal webspace?

      --

      Code softly but carry a big magnet.

    10. Re:Delicious by wahaa · · Score: 1

      I started using Delicious after I hit performance issues with Xmarks. I may have too many bookmarks, but that doesn't justify freezing the browser for several seconds like Xmarks did.

    11. Re:Delicious by alexo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But it doesn't matter. Firefox Sync is built in to Firefox 4, and it does all that too.

      FF Sync does not allow you to:

      1. Access your bookmarks from the web (when using somebody else's machine), and

      2. Have different profiles (not syncing the NSFW bookmark-subtree to your work machine)

      That said, I will start switching to FF Sync before Xmarks goes under so I can have a backup if anything foes wrong.

    12. Re:Delicious by Galestar · · Score: 1
      Proxy filter at work:

      You have requested http://del.icio.us/ Access to the requested web page is denied using Burst Technology Filtering Software. The Requested web page is categorized as Social Networking. If you think this is in error, please contact your system administrator.

      --
      AccountKiller
    13. Re:Delicious by Americano · · Score: 1

      Well, then, I suspect you're hosed, and down to mailing HTML exports of your bookmarks around. :)

    14. Re:Delicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't see the big deal. I use Opera, which has syncing built in. If I ever want to use my bookmarks in another browser, I can always just pull up my Opera bookmarks page and use them like that.

      For passwords I use a hashing widget so that I only need to remember a single master password, but can have individual strong passwords for each site. It's much more secure and tidy than syncing passwords all over the place.

    15. Re:Delicious by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      >2. Have different profiles (not syncing the NSFW bookmark-subtree to your work machine)
      It's called "having a different profile in Firefox"

    16. Re:Delicious by alexo · · Score: 1

      It's called "having a different profile in Firefox"

      No, it doesn't.
      FF profiles have completely different bookmarks, passwords, etc.
      What Xmarks allows (allowed?) me to do is to sync everything (both ways!) except a sub-tree of bookmarks that were not pushed to my work machine.

    17. Re:Delicious by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      no, keep your nsfw stuff in one profile, sfw in another, and sync as needed. e.g. sync the sfw profile to work, and sync both profiles to your laptop. same effect via different means. and it's nice to have nsfw stuff on a different profile even aside from syncing issues.

    18. Re:Delicious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NSFW tree goes in a separate Firefox profile, of course. :-)

    19. Re:Delicious by alexo · · Score: 1

      The NSFW tree goes in a separate Firefox profile, of course. :-)

      That is inconvenient. Why should I care about SFW/NSFW when I'm browsing from home?

  5. Re:Hey, krulgar- by neiltrodden · · Score: 1

    Did you ever consider giving them some fucking money for that service?

    Did they ever consider charging for it?

  6. Hmmm by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

    Might be an opportunity for a micro-payment level subscription service here...

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    1. Re:Hmmm by vlm · · Score: 1

      Might be an opportunity for a micro-payment level subscription service here...

      I can't read their minds nor speak for them, but I always figured their business plan revolved around the only thing more important / monetizable than what people search for, is what people find and decide to keep.

      Probably the synergy of their bookmark data with a search engine would have been great. As an example, I've bookmarked "the next hope" (NYC 2600 conference, etc etc) so that URL is probably the most relevant answer to a search of the words "the next hope".

      My guess is their game plan was to find a search engine with some bucks and sell out. Once everyone says no thanks, may as well pull the plug and try the next startup idea.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Hmmm by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      I find myself wondering what kind of numbers they'd need for a break-even, as well as how small the code would have to be for a mobile-device discriminating semi-sync version (only brings bookmarks to mobile-friendly or mobile-capable sites from one's home list)

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
    3. Re:Hmmm by cgenman · · Score: 1

      If they can read your bookmarks, they can know what you're interested in. If they know that, they can sell that information to advertising companies, who can target you more effectively.

      I doubt there is a lot of money to be made there, but it should be enough.

  7. Sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using them since I started using firefox only and wanted to be able to have the same bookmarks no matter what computer I was logged onto at school. They've provided a great service for years - I'll miss them.

  8. Eh, good riddance by IICV · · Score: 0

    I used Xmarks for a little while, but their client was way way too intrusive; I ended up turning it off because I just didn't like its nagging (I think it had saved the wrong password or something).

    Also, I never understood why my data had to go through their servers - wouldn't it be good enough to just have multiple syncing computers on at the same time? I can see using their servers for scheduling, but actually storing the data? And then there's the super creepy option of saving your passwords - I'm not even sure why they offered that one.

    1. Re:Eh, good riddance by LikwidCirkel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I remember when they changed from "Foxmarks" to "Xmarks" and introduced password sync. They actually asked for input on whether users would actually use the password sync feature. I responded, essentially by telling they they're out of their fscking minds to offer such a sketchy feature, and no, I would not be using it.

    2. Re:Eh, good riddance by SirGeek · · Score: 1

      That's my biggest gripe. I'm a geek and I can setup my 0wn "server". I don't trust ANYONE with my browser history, passwords, etc. (How much data mining did they do on what was saved and will that be getting sold off after they "close" ?)

    3. Re:Eh, good riddance by Rallion · · Score: 1

      It would be a lot more complicated to have a system without a central server. It wouldn't work for everybody, for one thing, because they would always need to have some combination of systems up. If you only have two, one would always have to be up when the other was activated. A central server pretty much eliminates the problem of ISP outages (because you aren't using your bookmarks if the internet is out). You would need to have firewalls open and ports forwarded to allow for direct transfers between computers.

      When you consider all of that, storing things server-side is really the best way to make it usable by a large number of people.

      Also, keeping the stuff server-side allows you to use the service as a zero-effort backup, which I've found handy in the past.

    4. Re:Eh, good riddance by oneplus999 · · Score: 1

      what was saved and will that be getting sold off after they "close" ?)

      I've been using their service for a while, including password saves on pretty much everything but banking sites (so email, amazon, newegg, etc) with no issues. From one of their pages on the closing, http://www.xmarks.com/about/shutdown :

      Privacy and Your Data We understand that you have entrusted us with the task of storing your personal browser data and we take that responsibility very seriously. * We will never sell or release your personal data, and we will make sure to delete all user data once the Xmarks service shuts down. * If you'd like to take immediate action, click here to immediately delete your account and user data. (Make sure you have all your data first!)

    5. Re:Eh, good riddance by networkBoy · · Score: 1
      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    6. Re:Eh, good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they data mined, and got so wealthy, that they decided to close their doors, and run off to Aruba and retire with the dime(s) they have made in the process. That's because EVERYONE gives a shit about your p0rn habits

    7. Re:Eh, good riddance by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I don't even trust my browser to store that information, let alone somebody else's server. I personally use Keepass and KeepassX to do that for me.

    8. Re:Eh, good riddance by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      I use the password sync feature, but I also use my own server on the backend. I probably wouldn't use it if I'd ever used their servers.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    9. Re:Eh, good riddance by tftp · · Score: 1

      It would be a lot more complicated to have a system without a central server.

      You can always encrypt your data with a decent cipher and upload onto Freenet.

    10. Re:Eh, good riddance by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      with weave, you can set up your own server, but even if you don't, your data is gpg encrypted on the mozilla server

  9. Opera by Smivs · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Opera lets you sync your bookmarks.

    1. Re:Opera by tangelogee · · Score: 3, Informative

      Opera lets you sync your bookmarks.

      Each of the browsers (sans IE I believe) have their own syncing. The real benefit to xmarks was being able to sync across all the browsers.

    2. Re:Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IE bookmarks can automatically be synced with Windows Live Sync (beta).

    3. Re:Opera by tangelogee · · Score: 3, Informative

      IE bookmarks can automatically be synced with Windows Live Sync (beta).

      I stand corrected. However, the main point still stands. None of these will sync to another browser.

    4. Re:Opera by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. However, the main point still stands. None of these will sync to another browser.

      What kind of situation calls for this?

      (I'm not asking to argue, I'm curious if I'm likely to ever encounter it...)

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:Opera by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      I use firefox and chrome on my PC, and firefox and safari on mac. I also test in ie. When you use multiple browsers, it's convenient to have the usual bookmarks available on them.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    6. Re:Opera by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Outside of web-testing have you encountered it? Like a workplace that only allows certain browsers?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:Opera by tangelogee · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Also, some browsers do some things better than others.

      I admit, most of the time I use Firefox, but there are some occasions to use other browsers depending on the machine you are using.

      Also, it was nice to have the option to go to the xmarks site, for those times I am at a site for a few minutes, and need a link I found last week.

    8. Re:Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When syncing with my iPhone, reading the IE bookmarks works best, so setting up IE to sync with other browsers is nice. Also if I want to try out a new browser that has an XMarks plugin, I can migrate most of my browsing information easily. I also use Safari on my Mac, but Firefox on my PC... I can't sync these two without XMarks.

    9. Re:Opera by Americano · · Score: 1

      Yes. At work, the only authorized web browsers are IE6 and FF 3.6.

      At home, where I run a Mac, I used Safari, and more and more recently, Chrome.

      Being able to sync bookmarks from home to work would be terribly useful, and presently involves a lot of mucking around with mailing exported HTML files back and forth to keep things in sync.

      I'm working on getting them to let me install Chrome here, which would help... but I keep hearing the old "but it could be insecure, and nobody above me has approved it," argument.

    10. Re:Opera by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      At work I can't use chrome 'cause its not installed. So its Firefox. At home, my netbook just lags with firefox, so I use Chrome.

      In this situation, Xmarks was the only option I had to keep both browsers synchronized (Firefox at work, Chrome on the netbook)

      --
      -- dnl
    11. Re:Opera by moronoxyd · · Score: 1

      I use Firefox at home, because I'm used to it.
      Opera on my notebook, because it's more lightweight and works faster on non-broadband connections.
      I have to use IE at work (and yes, that sucks).
      I like to have a look at what Chrome is doing every once in a while.

      Just because you stick to one browser only doesn't mean that there are no reasons for other people to work differently.

    12. Re:Opera by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      Yep, I have some internal corporate sites that only can use IE. For the rest I use FF. Having a cross browser is great for that.

      This would not be an issue though if we still had that gem called IE Tab add-on for FF.

    13. Re:Opera by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Just because you stick to one browser only doesn't mean that there are no reasons for other people to work differently.

      Actually I don't stick to just one browser, which is why I was asking. I run Opera, FF, and Chrome (Safari, too, if you count my phone) and haven't encountered a big need for a service like that. That's why I asked questions to learn more instead of making a big karma-posing speech about how whatever method I use is better.

      Cool your jets, hotshot. This is one instance of you blazing forward on a bad assumption. Next time you could get zinged.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:Opera by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Have you tried finding a 'portable' version of your favorite browser, or is it one of those things where they won't let you run it anyway?

      (Xmarks is a better solution, but since it's going bye-bye I thought I'd offer that suggestion if it hasn't crossed your path yet.)

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    15. Re:Opera by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      At work it's basically an old Firefox: I'm stuck with and OLD kernel, so its very hard to run anything that is up-to-date.

      At home, I'm stuck with chrome: the main problem is the netbook, because firefox just lags around when I go to javascript-heavy pages (like gmail).

      Besides those two, there is still my desktop, wich runs Windows and Linux and have both browsers installed.

      I am currently evaluating delicious.com with some high hopes...

      --
      -- dnl
    16. Re:Opera by Rallion · · Score: 1

      I use Chrome on Windows and Firefox on Ubuntu, by preference.

      I prefer Chrome, but I have some issues with it in Ubuntu. If those get solved (or if they just stop affecting ME) then I would switch to Chrome completely and would have no need for cross-browser syncing.

  10. NOOOOOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i used this on like 5 computers... DAMNIT

  11. Really useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't write an online bookmark system in an afternoon, hand in your geek card and GTFO!

    1. Re:Really useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      I suppose I could write my own bookmark system. I suppose I could also cut my own grass. But I have other geek things I'd rather be doing, so that's what I pay Mexicans for.

    2. Re:Really useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful and insulting at the same time! Congratulations!

    3. Re:Really useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't write an online bookmark system in an afternoon, hand in your geek card and GTFO!

      You use the word geek but I do not think it means what you think it means.

      Case In Point for the slow: Geek != Programming nerd.

    4. Re:Really useful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Every utterance of mine is carefully selected for maximum effect.

  12. This Really Sucks by ElusiveMind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've been using Xmarks since they were Foxmarks and it's the only tool out there that syncs multiple browsers. It's really handy when you have a folder full of client URL's and you need to check them on multiple browsers and operating systems. I'd gladly have paid for the service - but they never asked or proposed it. Sure some people would have balked and left, but those that stayed could have supported your business. I refuse to give my bookmark data to Google and I really just don't trust anyone else that is associated with a search engine or browser developer.

    1. Re:This Really Sucks by vlm · · Score: 1

      I'd gladly have paid for the service - but they never asked or proposed it.

      They had a 99 cent ipod app that worked quite well.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:This Really Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > I've been using Xmarks since they were Foxmarks ...
      > I refuse to give my bookmark data to Google

      You already give your bookmark data to google. XMarks switched to using googleapis and their database (and requiring javascript execution of code from googleapis on your machine) in V3.7. Check out their forum where users who noticed (NoScript and RequestPolicy users mainly) went through the roof. I immediately rolled back the version we used to 3.6.x, which does not run code or store data on f-ing google nor does it require you to execute google javascript. I hardly liked the idea of foxmarks/xmarks having (and using for their ratings and suggestions aggregation) my bookmark data in the first place, and I sure the hell never turned on their password sync, but it was convenient for syncing bookmarks across the dozen or so machines I use. Now that FF4 has sync built in, good riddance. Their attempt to move my surfing habits off to the google cloud was the last straw for me anyway. Again, good riddance.

    3. Re:This Really Sucks by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      It's really handy when you have a folder full of client URL's and you need to check them on multiple browsers and operating systems.

      If only there was some mechanism by which your browser could home in on a certain page of links when you started it. Bonus points if the mechanism provides an animated image reminding you and the other people who stopped on by to log into it that it's under construction.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:This Really Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a look at http://alternativeto.net/software/xmarks/

      Some interesting options there.

  13. Re:Try Opera by doroshjt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    or chrome

  14. Gmarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Gmarks for Firefox lets you sync your google bookmarks! It's awesome! 'nuff said.

    1. Re:Gmarks by HangingChad · · Score: 1

      I'd be lost without Gmarks. As often as I rebuild computers and try different operating systems, I used to forget to backup my bookmark files all the time.

      Usually remembered in the middle of the partition editor. D'oh!

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    2. Re:Gmarks by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Just to be sure: if I get a gmarks extension on my firefox I can keep my bookmarls synchronized on Chrome AND Firefox? Because if its true, I am saved! That what I was really doing with xmarks...

      --
      -- dnl
    3. Re:Gmarks by c · · Score: 1

      > if I get a gmarks extension on my firefox I can
      > keep my bookmarls synchronized on Chrome AND Firefox?

      It's a Firefox extension (based around Google Notebook as a storage backend), so probably not. But I don't use Chrome; there may be a way to make it work.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
  15. Use Chrome by Tuan121 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Tools->Options->Personal Stuff->Sync

    Enter your gmail account, choose if you want bookmarks, preferences, extensions etc.

    All done. Works.

    /queue omggoogleknowsmybookmarks crowd

    1. Re:Use Chrome by ElusiveMind · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah - but the beauty of Xmarks is it synced Chrome, Firefox, MSIE and Safari with one central repository of bookmarks. Now I have to keep four separate ones... one for each browser. For people like me who have to use and check my work on all browsers it was a major time saver when you have several hundred client bookmarks.

    2. Re:Use Chrome by TechnoFrood · · Score: 1

      The one feature Xmarks had (apart from cross browser syncing) that Chrome's built in sync doesn't do is let you control which bookmarks each of your PCs get, for example at work I have a few local only bookmarks, I don't want these on any browsers but my work ones, likewise I have internal links to a couple of boxes at home. This also allowed me to have a link to a box at home link to the 192.168.1.x address and at work my external ip.

    3. Re:Use Chrome by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      /queue omggoogleknowsmybookmarks crowd

      It's "cue", although I suppose in this context "queue" could work also.

      I don't want Google to know what porn sites I bookmark. Queue begins behind me.

  16. Firefox Sync by Lennie · · Score: 2, Informative

    You could also use Firefox Sync. It used to be called, Mozilla Weave and was an add-on, which will not be included in Firefox 4 proper.

    With Xmarks, they would be able to read your bookmarks, etc. With Firefox Sync everything that is stored/transfered is encrypted.

    It is even possible to setup your own 'server', have a look for "Weave Minimal Server", so you don't have to depend on Mozilla or anyone else.

    --
    New things are always on the horizon
    1. Re:Firefox Sync by vlm · · Score: 1

      It used to be called, Mozilla Weave and was an add-on, which will now be included in Firefox 4 proper.

      Changed your "not" to "now".

      As per

      http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/sync/

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Firefox Sync by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that was a typo. :-)

      Silly me.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    3. Re:Firefox Sync by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I really like Firefox Sync. Been using it since it was Weave (not that long ago...) and on my own server. I wish Chrome would support it. Also that when Fennec comes out for real it'll let you use your own servers!

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    4. Re:Firefox Sync by Kalidor · · Score: 1

      I dunno about 'not that long ago.' I distinctly remember using it in my last job and that had to be sometime in '07? I'm sure I quit that job in December of '07.

      --

      Code softly but carry a big magnet.

    5. Re:Firefox Sync by Jethro · · Score: 1

      I mean it was still called Weave not very long ago.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    6. Re:Firefox Sync by spungebob · · Score: 1

      I'm sure he's referring only to the name change from Weave to Sync, which happened 'not that long ago' (earlier this summer). Weave itself has been around at least as long as you remember, of course.

      --
      It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
    7. Re:Firefox Sync by Kalidor · · Score: 1

      Ah! Whoops, my mistake.

      --

      Code softly but carry a big magnet.

  17. Gmarks by c · · Score: 1

    I use Gmarks (Firefox extension) for this. Works pretty well if you don't mind the combination of Firefox and Google.

    --
    Log in or piss off.
  18. Thanks guys by Daetrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's sad that they've reached the point of having to shut down, but i've got to say that at least they've handled the situation with a lot of class. They're giving their users several months warning rather than just shutting down the servers overnight, and when they did market research that indicated there wouldn't be enough demand for a subscription version to sustain them they just decided not to offer one and shut down gracefully. As opposed to what seems to be the more common tactic of convincing their biggest supporters to hand over money for a little while and then having to shut down anyways, and then figure out how to do refunds or just tell everyone to go suck it.

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  19. Re:Hey, krulgar- by jgagnon · · Score: 1

    This is why you hand out cash to random people... in the hopes that you will help a future beggar.

    --
    Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
  20. Next time start a business _and_ ask to be paid... by bhlowe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why didn't the developers ask to be paid for their service? I love their toolbar and bookmark synching and would gladly pay a yearly fee for it.. $10/$15 year seems fair. :)

  21. Other options by Lord+Cronos · · Score: 0

    There are always other options for what you need done. It's one of the reasons that the internet so great and it's also why a service like Xmarks can shut down with very little inconvenience for its users.

    --
    It's exactly what it looks like
  22. Easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Open Gmail.

    Start new message.

    Paste in links.

    Save as Draft.

    Open and update from home or work.

  23. I don't get it... by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    You guys use a service to sync your bookmarks? I thought the slashdot crowd had privacy concerns over such stuff. Especially when the manual sync is just an scp command away...
    Personally, I have a different set of bookmarks at work than at home and the only time I would sync (via the aforementioned scp command) would be after setting up a new machine. But the last couple of years or so I have stopped copying over my old bookmarks to new machines. My favorite sites come up by typing the first couple of characters and I bookmark only the few pages I need that don't come up in the first page of google results, which I usually won't need any longer by the time I switch to a new machine (ok, they still stay in a backup somewhere)...

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:I don't get it... by ViViDboarder · · Score: 1

      I would use a shell script, but I also have Windows computers to use. Is there a good ftp/sftp Windows command line tool that I can script?

    2. Re:I don't get it... by straponego · · Score: 2, Informative

      Last I checked Cygwin was pretty good. Far better than putty/pscp.

    3. Re:I don't get it... by zizzo · · Score: 1

      Here's the deal:

      I have 4 computers at home, running windows and MacOSX. I have 1 at work running Windows. Many of these dual boot and run Linux. Two of them have VMs running guest OSes. All of them have multiple browsers; some combination of IE, Firefox, Chrome, and Safari. I use all of them, not because I'm crazy but because the "best" browser changes every 6 months. XMarks managed to keep my bookmarks synced across all these browsers and all these OSes. And it did it painlessly.

      I'm not sure why everyone thinks I should "man" up and write my own. I didn't write my own browser, OS, GUI, etc. A fool makes new tools when existing ones are already on the workbench.

    4. Re:I don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:I don't get it... by lattyware · · Score: 1

      What about if his tool falls off the workbench and breaks?

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    6. Re:I don't get it... by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Hmm. Interesting. I have several pc's at home and at work, most of which run VM's on top and they are a good mix (Linux, Win XP, Win 7, Mac OS X). Yet each one has a specific purpose, so I browse on a couple, the rest are not for browsing the net. I mean, why would you have many browsing machines?
      Then, saying "the best browser changes every 6 months" is very strange. Do you always use the browser that at that point of time is the best in the ACID test or a java benchmark? Otherwise browsers don't change dramatically from one day to the next so switching browser often would seem counter productive to me.
      So while I don't understand why you would need to sync bookmarks on 10 OS's x 4 browsers each, I can just admit that for you, a very peculiar user, something like XMarks would make sense...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    7. Re:I don't get it... by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Doesn't everyone just stick a hidden html file on their web server with all their favorite links? I've been doing this for like 10 years.

    8. Re:I don't get it... by spungebob · · Score: 1

      I have a desktop at home, a laptop for mobility and general use around-the-house plus a netbook on my nightstand. I browse on all three of them and syncing bookmarks has been a godsend to me. For example, I browse music download sites on all three but I only actually download on the desktop. For that usage alone it's worth it, but that's not the only scenario for me.

      I wouldn't call my situation "peculiar" by any means and it certainly wouldn't need 10 OS's and 40 or more browsers to justify using a bookmark syncer. Any quantity of browser > 1 is reason enough for me!

      --
      It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
  24. Re:Hey, krulgar- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you ever consider your name isn't krulgar?

  25. They never figured out Step 2. by daivzhavue · · Score: 1

    Step 2 ?????

    That's the problem here.

    --
    "A REAL computer has ONE speed and the only powersaving it permits is when you pull the power leads out of the back!"
    1. Re:They never figured out Step 2. by cdoggyd · · Score: 0

      Step 1: Sync bookmarks across browsers and platforms.
      Step 2: ???
      Step 3: Profit!

      Tip of the hat to the underpants gnomes.

  26. Will sync to own server still work??? by wondercool · · Score: 1

    For me the killing feature is to sync to your own webdav or ftp server. I don't like to hand over all my personal stuff to Google or any other and use BYO server functionality.

    So will that still work?

    1. Re:Will sync to own server still work??? by ElusiveMind · · Score: 1

      Wow... I hadn't even thought of this. The only problem is the widgets will not get updated as new versions of browsers come out. Unless we could convince them to open source the widget code.

    2. Re:Will sync to own server still work??? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Unless they intend to break it, I think it should still work fine; since it works without an internet connection and all, right...?

    3. Re:Will sync to own server still work??? by wondercool · · Score: 1

      No, it needs an internet connection. LAN would work as well. It's a very nice feature

    4. Re:Will sync to own server still work??? by number17 · · Score: 1

      I will assume that it will still work. You could test it out by blocking them in your hosts file. The problem I have is that development for new browsers will stop. You can always edit the install.rdf file to make it compatible but that might lead to instability.

    5. Re:Will sync to own server still work??? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Um.. you just said 'needs an internet connection' and then 'LAN would work as well'.

      So which is it?

      Obviously it's possible to have no internet connection and still have a LAN.

      Usually this situation can easily be created by logging into the local router and shutting down power to the WAN port, or physically unplugging the cable.

  27. just use Opera ? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    they synch nicely

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:just use Opera ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, Opera's sync service does not work reliably. When I tried to use it to keep three computers in sync, Opera's sync would miss new bookmarks, or would resurrect bookmarks I had long since deleted.

  28. Re:Try Opera by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2, Informative

    "It would still be nice to have a single way to keep my bookmarks from my work machine in sync with my home machines and my mobile devices without exerting much effort."

    Try Opera...

    Pity he was snide in his post, he does have a point. Opera has had this as an integrated feature for years. It also synchronizes your speed-dial and and your 'notes', which are like bookmarks but are organized by the section of text you highlight. Very handy. I especially like this feature for keeping useful snippets of Python around.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  29. I use del.icio.us by kikito · · Score: 1

    And I also use it for other things, like sending links to friends.

  30. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Xmarks can be configured to use a local FTP server instead of the Xmarks server.

    Most of the complaints I read are solved by RTFM and better config choices.

    Sad to see Xmarks go.

  31. Re:Another project dies off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except to all the people who used it, like me.

  32. experiance by helix2301 · · Score: 1

    I am really upset see this go I been using this for the last few years such a great service. I hope all the workers and owners find jobs at Mozilla, Opera or Google there experience will be a big benefit to there products.

  33. hook up Xmarks with apache+webdav by Pouic · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you happen to have your own apache server handy, just setup up a personal server with Xmarks, it works beautifully (over https as well). I'm using this combination for quite some time now, with great satisfaction and independence. As stated above, I also don't want to store my private stuff on third party storage.

    1. Re:hook up Xmarks with apache+webdav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If... just...

    2. Re:hook up Xmarks with apache+webdav by smartin · · Score: 1

      I do this as well and it works great. Unfortunately they never released a version of the Safari plugin that worked with you own server.

      --
      The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    3. Re:hook up Xmarks with apache+webdav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I do the same. I also use the webDAV server for my calendars. I just wish the other stuff (history, tabs) worked with my own server like bookmarks/passwords did. I even cobbled together a bookmark cross-importer between my home and work profiles for the specific bookmark folders I wanted shared between them. It's just a JSON file.

    4. Re:hook up Xmarks with apache+webdav by jmvbxx · · Score: 1

      Can you point in the right direction to set this up properly?

    5. Re:hook up Xmarks with apache+webdav by Nethead · · Score: 1

      If you have your own server then just make a web page of all the links! Maybe call that page your "homepage" or something catchy like that.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    6. Re:hook up Xmarks with apache+webdav by Threni · · Score: 1

      And then, instead of going `control-d` to create a bookmark, simply connect to the other server from behind a corporate firewall and fireup a html editor...

    7. Re:hook up Xmarks with apache+webdav by Nethead · · Score: 1

      So, ssh and vi. What's the problem?

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    8. Re:hook up Xmarks with apache+webdav by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this work through NAT? I think there is a problem with the Xmarks BYOS client here that needs to be addressed.

      -J

    9. Re:hook up Xmarks with apache+webdav by smsiebe · · Score: 1

      I went looking across their website and can't find a download for their server code. Do you know where to get this? If I can get a copy of their server API (to their clients), I can set something up on google app engine or the like....

  34. Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And this pretty much is one of the key reasons I use Opera.

    Syncs perfectly from machine to machine, typed URL history, bookmarks, speed dial setup, search engine preferences (& search engine searches), and notes (though I don't use this).

    Oh and it does this to my cellphone too.

    Now above isn't much help if you need to use firefox specific addons... But no, scripts still don't count people; Chrome and Opera both run do them natively where firefox requires an addon to do it. (Repeated because too many don't realize this)

  35. Re:Next time start a business _and_ ask to be paid by davev2.0 · · Score: 1

    Silly human, people would never have used it if they had to PAY for it because it is on the web. Everyone know that everything on the web is free or should be free.

  36. Best browser plugin by horza · · Score: 1

    Xmarks and Adblock are the two plugins I will instantly install on a new browser (well the latter for Firefox). Simple, reliable, cross-browser, does passwords as well as bookmarks, and over the years have shown they have no intention of misusing my personal information.

    A fantastic plugin that has greatly improved my browsing enjoyment. It will be sorely missed.

    Phillip.

  37. I'll bet it will become cross-browser. by ccady · · Score: 1

    I imagine that some smart people will make Sync plugins for other browsers.

    --
    J'aime mieux les méchants que les imbéciles, parce qu'ils se reposent. -- Alexandre Dumas
  38. Bookmarks?? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Um

    Bookmarks are so passe. I've stopped using Bookmarks because to find something I use Google, and if Google finds something for me, then it can find it again for me. Most of the linked articles off websites are transient or just plain timely (one time) pieces of info. Seriously, I've pretty much stopped using bookmarks and just use Google to find what I need.

    And the great thing, it is always available, even on my phone!!!

    I don't use cache or password remembering features because that is just plain stupid in today's world of dynamic content and security concerns (Firefox plaintext passwords?? ). This service offered me nothing I need.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Bookmarks?? by tangelogee · · Score: 1

      What if the sites you go to are not at the top of a google search? 2-3 clicks is a whole lot easier than typing in something that would get you to the top of the search.

      What if they are an intranet site, not viewable from the outside?

      Bookmarks are still a viable method for keeping track of oft-used sites.

    2. Re:Bookmarks?? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      I've seen people who bookmark every single thing they go to, their bookmark/favorites are a mess. So much so, they can't find what they are looking for in their bookmarks, so they google for it, and then bookmark it (adding to the mess).

      It all depends on your needs. My intranet sites are all memorized as there are only a few of them, and the names usually make sense to what they are.

      If you're detailed to organize your bookmarks/favorites, then I bow down before you. But you're the exception, not the rule. Most people don't take the time to organize favorites/bookmarks.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Bookmarks?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the sites you go to are not at the top of a google search?

      Not all of us want furry porn when we google for "cute kittens". Learn better google-fu.

  39. Use the source? by zornorph · · Score: 1

    Since they are shutting down the company, are they planning on releasing the code under GPL or some other license for others to make use of it?

    --
    http://bike.stu.ph/rides - free GPS routes available for Garmin, Magellan, GPX and Google Earth
  40. Too bad by Rix · · Score: 1

    Not everything can be monetized, I suppose. I'm certainly not blameless; I disabled their kinda creepy google shenanigans.

    Hopefully they'll release the plugin source, if they haven't already, so we can continue with our own servers.

  41. Re:Next time start a business _and_ ask to be paid by Myopic · · Score: 1

    Agreed. A dollar per month was what I was thinking.

  42. Re:Hey, krulgar- by krulgar · · Score: 1

    Did you ever consider giving them some fucking money for that service?

    Did they ever consider charging for it?

    Yes, actually, I would pay a subscription for this, I think it would be worth about $5/month (to me) to keep me from synchronizing manually. If there were another provider (or Xmarks) that would offer this, I would subscribe. Unfortunately, I was not part of their marketing analysis, and I have to trust that their sample size included others that did indicate this as well.
    Thank you for your well-considered (if inconsiderate) question.

  43. Foxmarks saved my laptop once by Zenaku · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am saddened to think of Xmarks (formerly Foxmarks) going under. Their announcement email explained the situation very nicely, however, and one can hardly fault them for calling it quits. They were never able to monetize the data they aggregated, and not enough people would be willing to pay a subscription fee now that all the browsers are providing sync themselves.

    I've been their add-on since almost day one; at first they didn't even have a central server to provide the service, it was just an add-on that you could point to an ftp server of your choice. (You can still point it to an ftp or WebDAV server of your choice, so that is one way to keep using it, at least until browser updates break compatibility).

    Actually, Foxmarks once got a stolen laptop returned to me. About a month after my house was burglarized, I noticed new bookmarks showing up in my browser on my other machines. The person who "acquired" my laptop never bothered to wipe and reinstall, or even to create a new user account. So every time he bookmarked a URL, Foxmarks would diligently sync it to my other computers. So, from my own machine, I edited all of the bookmarks to point to a redirect page on my server. Once my changes were synced back to my stolen laptop, I was able to record its IP address every time he used one of his bookmarks. I gave that to the police, and another month later they got my laptop back after subpoenaing his ISP to get his address.

    So, Foxmarks has a special place in my heart.

    --
    If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    1. Re:Foxmarks saved my laptop once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Don't you know that IPs can be spoofed!??!?!?! How dare you resort to MAFIAA tactics?

    2. Re:Foxmarks saved my laptop once by antdude · · Score: 1

      How was the thief able to use your laptop? Didn't you secure your accounts with passwords in OS and/or BIOS/CMOS? Did he/she crack your password(s) (doubt it)?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    3. Re:Foxmarks saved my laptop once by Patik · · Score: 1

      That's a nice story, but Chloe O'Brien could've done it in far less than 2 months.

    4. Re:Foxmarks saved my laptop once by Zenaku · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't have it set up to require login credentials, obviously. In the trade-off between ease of use and security, I considered the machine being physically taken to be a fairly unlikely event, and it was. The fact that it happened doesn't mean it was likely. I could say I learned a valuable lesson, but in reality the lesson I learned is that if I HAD secured it, I would not have gotten it back.

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    5. Re:Foxmarks saved my laptop once by antdude · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and the thief probably looked at your personal datas too without security. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:Foxmarks saved my laptop once by Zenaku · · Score: 2, Funny

      It turns out your common thief or buyer of stolen goods isn't really that sophisticated of a master criminal. They weren't after my data, just a normally expensive machine that they could get for free or cheap. For the guy who had my machine all those files filled with my information were just junk that was cluttering up his sweet new computer. He moved all my stuff into the trash can and moved on with his life.

      I ended up not losing any of my files (important stuff was backed up, but there were some pictures and things that hadn't yet been) because he never even emptied the trash.

      The real irony is that when I got my machine back, I had access to all of HIS personal data. Dude took a lot of pictures with the iSight camera. His girlfriend was pretty hot. Maybe crime does pay. :)

      --
      If fate makes you a motorcycle, you become a motorcycle.
    7. Re:Foxmarks saved my laptop once by antdude · · Score: 1

      Interesting. That's funny to see his personal datas. :D

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  44. Re:Another project dies off... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

    I also used this, 2 home computers and 2 work computers all will synced bookmarks worked great... I could bookmark a site at home that might be useful for work and have it waiting for me when I fired up that machine...

    really sad to see this go...

  45. Try Google bookmarks by beernutz · · Score: 3, Informative

    I really like the Google bookmark service.

    https://www.google.com/bookmarks/l

    Uses labels like gmail, and has browser addons.

    FF:
    https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/2888/

    It is built into chrome

    Safari:
    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/901411/goggles_use_google_bookmarks_with_safari.html?cat=15

    --
    (stolen from DaBum) I am dyslexia of borg - your ass will be laminated.
    1. Re:Try Google bookmarks by jbarr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For just syncing bookmarks, this is a great alternative, and it gives you Web access to your bookmarks. Of course, Firefox Sync and Xmarks also optionally synced other information such as history, passwords, etc. but GMarks does look solid.

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    2. Re:Try Google bookmarks by mr_stinky_britches · · Score: 1

      Thanks this is extremely helpful.

      --
      Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.
  46. XMarks, private server by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    I used XMarks back when it was called FoxMarks! Get off my lawn!

    But seriously, I thought it had a way to use a private server for storing the synchronization file?

    I've since moved to Chrome which has it built in, as does Opera so a coworker tells me.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:XMarks, private server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used XMarks back when it was called FoxMarks! Get off my lawn!

      Ummm... that was last year. Let's not get egotistical about this.

    2. Re:XMarks, private server by Mr.+Protocol · · Score: 1

      Yes, exactly. Xmarks does allow cross-browser synchronization, which is why I use it, but it also allows you to redirect it away from the Xmarks server and to any other server to which you have access, including (in my case) Mobile Me. So when Xmarks closes its doors, its servers will go away, but so far as I know, my copy of the code will keep right on working. I'm unhappy that development will stop, so as browser development continues and the code becomes out-of-date and non-functional I'll eventually have to find something else, but for now, my bookmarks will keep right on synchronizing.

  47. Re:Another project dies off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used it for about 2 minutes until I realized my browser had syncing capability built in. The only benefit to xmarks was if you needed to sync across multiple browser platforms. I've been an IT tech and Sysadmin for years and I still only use 1 browser. Find a browser that doesn't suck (Hint: IE and FF suck), stick with it and xmarks becomes a completely worthless addon.

  48. Re:Another project dies off... by ihatejobs · · Score: 1

    Use the same browser across all those machines and you will have the same functionality. Xmarks was only really good at syncing across browsers, which is a pretty niche market when you get down to it. Chrome, FF and even IE have built in bookmark syncing.

    --
    Can anyone tell me why 99% of /. users are total assclowns?
  49. What about Delicious? by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    It doesn't do tab syncing, but it certainly does bookmark syncing, which seems to be what you really need. As far as I can tell it supports all the major browsers, too.

    1. Re:What about Delicious? by rtaylor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Password syncing is what I really want. For the most part I can remember the websites but remembering the individual password used for each is virtually impossible.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:What about Delicious? by robot_love · · Score: 2, Informative

      Have you considered LastPass or PasswordMaker?

      --
      .there is enough of everything for everyone.
  50. Delicious Dropbox Soup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd think some enterprising geek could use Dropbox as a substitute.

  51. Re:Another project dies off... by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

    I started using it before most browsers had it built in (back when it was called foxmarks instead of Xmarks and only worked on the one browser). This is of course the drawback to building a free product that adds functionality to another free product, if it is good the product your adding to will internalize the functionality rendering your product useless.

  52. Re:Hey, krulgar- by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

    FF native sync would be fine for those forced to use IE sometimes if they could bring back that IE Tab add-on. I have to use IE for some sites at work and that used to work great while never leaving my FF window.

  53. Re:Try Opera by wastedlife · · Score: 1

    While I do feel bad that Opera does tons of innovation and the other browsers then take those ideas, I've never liked Opera, I just cant get used to using it. Also, bookmarks and other things are synced between machines in many browsers, however Xmarks syncs multiple browsers. For example, we like having the same shared bookmarks, but my wife tends to use Chrome while I tend to use Firefox. Xmarks fixes this for us. Also, I only want to sync some of the bookmarks from our home computer with my work computer and vice-versa. Xmarks profiles fixes this. I'm normally a cheap-ass, but I would pay to keep using Xmarks for all the benefit it gives us.

    --
    Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
  54. Re:Another project dies off... by ihatejobs · · Score: 1

    True enough. Perhaps they should have appealed to the code team(s) of some of those free products and tried to become developers of the core products themselves? If you can write an add on that is good enough to be incorporated into the software, there's a good chance there would be room on the development team for you, at least in my books.

    --
    Can anyone tell me why 99% of /. users are total assclowns?
  55. Re:Another project dies off... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

    Okay, then how exactly does one sync bookmarks WITHOUT sending them to a third party? I have been using FEBE for this but if there is a better way I'm open for suggestions but I will NOT send my bookmarks to some company I have no prior relationship with. I just wants a simple way to sync bookmarks over a LAN that I control without having to give my data to anyone else. Call me paranoid but I like keeping my data private and you can learn too much about a person by data mining their bookmarks. So any non privacy destroying suggestions?

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  56. Re:Another project dies off... by Shadis · · Score: 1

    Or trying being a software developer who has to test stuff across a wide selection of browsers. Or in a company that will not let you use anything but their default browser, which happens not to be the browser you use at home. Xmarks has its place, or it had its place.

  57. Re:Another project dies off... by sglewis100 · · Score: 1

    Or trying being a software developer who has to test stuff across a wide selection of browsers. Or in a company that will not let you use anything but their default browser, which happens not to be the browser you use at home. Xmarks has its place, or it had its place.

    Any company that blocks you from using your own software probably extends that block to software addons and plugins.

  58. Re:Another project dies off... by Shadis · · Score: 1

    Funnily enough I've worked at two companies that let you install plugins into the browser, but you can't install any 'full' programs without prior approval. But you are right, most companies probably would not allow for that.

  59. Re:Hey, krulgar- by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    FF native sync would be fine for those forced to use IE sometimes if they could bring back that IE Tab add-on.

    I don't know that IE Tab ever left, although it has changed names.

  60. Re:Another project dies off... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    Call me paranoid but I like keeping my data private and you can learn too much about a person by data mining their bookmarks. So any non privacy destroying suggestions?

    Although the info might be out of date, Foxmarks had instructions on how to use your own server.

  61. Re:GREEDY BASTARDS !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That;s fucking funny because the bozos didn't make any money apparently. But since they are bozos they can still do those parties. Bozo the clown. Get it? Huh? Huh?

  62. Re:Another project dies off... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    Use the same browser across all those machines and you will have the same functionality. Xmarks was only really good at syncing across browsers, which is a pretty niche market when you get down to it.

    One of the best features of Xmarks was "profiles", which is not a feature of Firefox Sync.

    Basically, profiles allowed you to have all of your bookmarks from all machines stored on the server, but then pick which folders are part of the sync for a specific machine. This allowed me to keep my "only at work" (i.e., private Intranet) bookmarks in sync across all the work machines I use, but never see those bookmarks at home (or vice-versa).

  63. bookmarks was also visible in google hits by n00bonator · · Score: 1

    Xmarks has also additional functionality: worldwide bookmarked content was wisible in google hits. It was a great enhancement to search, I'm gonna miss this as much as real life cross-browser bookmarking.

  64. Data Mining by SlaveToSoftware · · Score: 1

    In the blog post they do talk about how they tried to monetize this data. Nothing proved to make a profit...

  65. dropbox? by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

    It would still be nice to have a single way to keep my bookmarks from my work machine in sync with my home machines and my mobile devices without exerting much effort.

    You could set your browser prefs to save their bookmarks to Dropbox, and then they'd be the same everywhere.

    1. Re:dropbox? by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      It would still be nice to have a single way to keep my bookmarks from my work machine in sync with my home machines and my mobile devices without exerting much effort.

      You could set your browser prefs to save their bookmarks to Dropbox, and then they'd be the same everywhere.

      I do that with my konqueror/rekonq bookmarks, works a treat.

  66. Syncing is the key by tbuskey · · Score: 1

    I've been using a web browser since 1993, both at home and at work.

    I have always had lots of bookmarks and usually want the same set at home and at work. It's always been a pain to combine them without duplicating or losing bookmarks. I used to use my bookmarks.html as my home page.

    I've gone from Mosaic to Netscape to Mozilla to Firefox. I tried external sites like delicious but didn't like how it got brought back to my browser. I tried scripts that would merge 2 copies into a master copy.

    Foxmarks was the 1st system that did what I wanted. It even helped when I tried Chrome. I love saving a bookmark at work and finding it at home.

    I don't want to have to sync anything else. I use different extensions, cookies, logins, etc at home/work. Work has a censoring proxy that blocks some sites. I don't use facebook, youtube, etc at work because they monitor for "excessive usage". I can wait until I get home in any event. I certainly don't want any tabes brought back to work.

    The next thing I want to find is a bookmark cleaner to clean out dead links. Some of my book marks might be for a device I power on in summer and off in winter every year and I want to keep those even if they go off the network.

  67. Re:Another project dies off... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    Xmarks was not really a plugin for IE. You don't need an 'IE plugin' to manage IE bookmarks, they're filesystem objects. Xmarks IE sync was just a program that edited them, and didn't really need an special permissions.

    I always thought they missed out on having a program that does that that doesn't even require installation...put it on a flash drive, and it could keep a directory of 'Favorites' in sync. Regardless of whether or not that's the directory that shows up in IE, you can still double-click them in Windows and they open in the default browser.

    In fact, I use my Start Menu's favorite list sometimes even though I use Firefox...I can add a bookmark in IE, and it makes the round trip through Xmarks and ends up in my Favorite list.

    Guess I have to figure out some other way.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  68. Re:Another project dies off... by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

    Screw you, I used this heavily to sync bookmarks across 6 different systems. It was the only one that would sync Firefox for my linux desktop and work laptop, my work xp machine which needs to use IE and Chrome by standards and Safari on my personal macbook so that I could keep my book marks sync'd to my iPhone and iPad.

  69. That really changes my life :( by disi · · Score: 1

    see a nice video at work -> bookmark and watch at home
    see an interesting article or something you want to read -> bookmark and read at home
    see anything you want to keep -> bookmark it and use the same bookmarks on every computer
    dual boot into Windows -> use the same bookmarks

    setup a new computer -> go to xmarks.com, login and you have all your bookmarks in ~1min

    I thought about Opera for everything and use their service then. Apparently their browser is most stable if it comes to Javascript etc. the big xulrunner package is annoying anyway :D

    because of XMarks, I now have to decide which browser to use :/

  70. Re:Another project dies off... by disi · · Score: 1

    That is the biggest problem with Firefox, it doesn't work with policies. Otherwise there might be many more companies running Firefox instead of IE.
    And if it is just for sake of "running properly", check here for new Javascript compatibility: http://sputnik.googlelabs.com/
    First place Opera, followed by FF and Chrome, then IE with 6 time more errors than Opera -.-

  71. Xmarks may live on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from Xmarks blog

    "UPDATE: We’ve set up a Pledgebank page where you can sign up if you’re willing to pay at least $10 a year for Xmarks. No credit card is required, but please only pledge if you are genuinely willing and able to pay:

    www.pledgebank.com/XmarksPremium "

    There may be hope after all.

  72. Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good riddance.

    Once they moved beyond Bookmark syncing and in to ratings, and other junk, I told them to take a hike and moved on. I'm glad to see others joined me.