Slashdot Mirror


Court Rules Dungeons and Dragons Threatens Prison Security

KermodeBear writes "Dungeons and Dragons — originally Satan's Game — has now been found to encourage gang-like behavior. In a finding by a three judge panel of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, D&D 'can mimic the organization of gangs and lead to the actual development thereof.' From the ruling: 'during D&D games, one player is denoted the "Dungeon Master." 'The Dungeon Master is tasked with giving directions to other players, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.'"

353 comments

  1. Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Elgonn · · Score: 2, Informative

    This story is at least a year old. Thanks slashdot for rehashing the past.

    1. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To be fair, it seems Fox News is the culprit this time (well, editors could have noticed the dupe but really that would be going a bit above what I've come to expect from them). The Fox News article is dated yesterday, Jan 26, 2011; the sources that they reference are dated Jan 26, 2010. So yeah, pretty much exactly a year old, probably someone searching for a topic entered the wrong date on their criteria and we end up with a year old dupe on the front page.

    2. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Informative

      "A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit weighed in Wednesday [that's yesterday]."

      So how is this story "at least a year old"? RTFA!

      Oh and I can't help noticing the description about D&D is reminiscent of ANY organization. A Master ordering people what to do? Sounds like the President of my country or the CEO of my company.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    3. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      Fully admit - did not RTFA, is this new though, an appeal of the original case.

      And as a long time D&D'er I think they missed the important role the Caller plays as the gang^H^H^H^H party leader. DM? That would be more like the old, ex gangster that acts as an informal liaison between the cops/community leaders and the current gangs. :-)

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    4. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oh and I can't help noticing the description about D&D is reminiscent of ANY organization. A Master ordering people what to do? Sounds like the President of my country or the CEO of my company.

      Did you also notice how it's wrong with relation to D&D?

      The Dungeon Master doesn't tell players what to do, he's asks them what they are going to do, and the DM just tells them the consequences.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Elgonn · · Score: 0

      So how is this story "at least a year old"? RTFA!

      Such vicious ignorance. Please read the actual original article.

    6. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by commodore73 · · Score: 0

      Nowadays, reading slashdot is like watching TV news - it feels like checking the Internet wayback machine, even if things are only a day or even a few hours old. Maybe that's why "news for nerds" is gone - slashdot topics are almost never new anymore (more like advertisements, almost feeling desperate sometimes).

    7. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Dungeon Master doesn't tell players what to do, he's asks them what they are going to do, and the DM just tells them the consequences.

      Yeah, this is nothing like a gang! More like the mob...

      "Thats an awfully nice D12 you got there...be a real shame if you didn't roll higher then a 5 on it..."

    8. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Thanks slashdot for rehashing the past."

      What do you expect, without someone to organise?

    9. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by brainboyz · · Score: 1

      I'll have to use that on my players at some point.

    10. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did you also notice how it's wrong with relation to D&D?

      The Dungeon Master doesn't tell players what to do, he's asks them what they are going to do, and the DM just tells them the consequences.

      "You are standing in a steamy prison shower, about 15x24' with twelve shower heads lining the walls. Five of them are being used by what appear to be orcish gang members. Make a dexterity check, at minus two due to its slipperiness, to maintain your grip on your soap."

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    11. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by sjames · · Score: 2

      Of course, the worst gang in prison is the screws! They even tell rival gangs what to do and if they don't do it, they start busting skulls. If you try to get out of the neighborhood, they'll bust a cap in your ass.

    12. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by DreamArcher · · Score: 1

      Crap! A 2. If I live til the next turn I'd like to pull out and attack with my huge vorpal weapon.

    13. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 4, Funny

      the DM just tells them the consequences.

      You mean like a panel of judges???

      --
      the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    14. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by jason.sweet · · Score: 4, Informative

      There was also a Wednesday last year.

      TFA does not mention dates, but the referenced court documents are all dated 2010. The Geeks Are Sexy (citation needed) link is also dated today, but it references an Above the Law story from a year ago.

    15. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It sucks when the guards are all coming down on your shit, and, like, taking your stuff, but it also sucks pretty bad to be beaten to death with a sledgehammer, which is what this guy did to get in there. Tends to dilute the sympathy."

      http://www.penny-arcade.com/2010/1/27/

    16. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

      Yeah... An aerobics class is more like a gang than D&D by that definition.

      On a side note, I wonder if they ban Mafia Wars on Facebook?

    17. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2

      I reach into my bag of holding for the +3 anal protection lube.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    18. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by JackOfAllGeeks · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I bet the CEO of your company isn't trying to kill you.

    19. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think half-orc would be more appropriate.

    20. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by crabel · · Score: 1

      Yeah. That story already pissed me off a year ago... I asked Mr. Stackpole, who is kinda an expert (being the author of the Pulling report, debunking the myth of RPG games being dangerous) about this. He told me, that nothing can be done since prisoners have simply less rights. Idiotic.

    21. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Segisaurus · · Score: 0

      It is from a year ago. I wrote a story about it on my website. Even the .pdf of the decision says Jan 2010 on it. Fox has messed up.

      http://www.the-games-blog.com/dd-banned-from-prisons-for-imitating-gang-behavior/Story from a year ago

    22. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by unwesen · · Score: 2

      Problems start when the players melt dice into shivs...

    23. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by spun · · Score: 1

      Half orc, quarter orc, you can't really tell, but they notice you looking at them. Do you want to inquire about their ancestry?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    24. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Guess they were just too white and nerdy...

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
    25. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Oh and I can't help noticing the description about D&D is reminiscent of ANY organization. A Master ordering people what to do? Sounds like the President of my country or the CEO of my company.

      Or a coach and his players. For really, any form of hierarchical system of management or governance.

      Please make sure you child never participates in any activity because, according to the legal system, its really training them to be gang members.

    26. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by baerm · · Score: 1

      Oh and I can't help noticing the description about D&D is reminiscent of ANY organization. A Master ordering people what to do? Sounds like the President of my country or the CEO of my company.

      Or, a judge in a courtroom....

    27. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by burtosis · · Score: 5, Funny

      Jesus saves, Everyone else takes full damage...

    28. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by memojuez · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      "...cooperative games can mimic the organization of gangs and lead to the actual development thereof."

      I'd say they'd ban soccer or basketball next.

      --
      Signature applied for, Patent Pending
    29. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Here's how it went...

      Can you PROVE D&D is not going to create gangs?

      which is unprovable...

      the problem with the ruling?

      Can you PROVE Bible Study groups are not going to create gangs?

      Can you PROVE Education Classes are not going to create gangs?

      ---

      It's not even as simple as "The warden gets to set the rules" because in various cases the warden's rules have been overruled. Personally, I think the Warden should be able to veto any recreational activity because they are on the line. It's their responsibility.

      But the case was a joke. It could be used to ban any activity and is basically enforcing the warden's religious preferences which means we have a government official enforcing their religion on others.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    30. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      JIM! Why do you keep dropping the soap. You are not even trying to make your roll!

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    31. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Next up, soccer, football, basketball, and any other activity where one group of people have to work together to accomplish some task.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    32. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the dice shows two"

      Brilliant!

    33. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      From TFA:

      "...cooperative games can mimic the organization of gangs and lead to the actual development thereof."

      I'd say they'd ban soccer or basketball next.

      And Bacci Ball

      --

      "So what do you guys do in there, play cards?" Question to John Gotti

    34. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by lorenlal · · Score: 2

      He does tell at least one of the players they are not involved in the fight because the character is currently in the bar...

    35. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by rednip · · Score: 1

      You are standing in a steamy prison shower...
      ....I reach into my bag of holding for the +3 anal protection lube.

      Personally, I'd be wearing my +5 shield of protection so that it covered my rear, but that's just me; obviously the perils you see are 'different'.

      --
      The force that blew the Big Bang continues to accelerate.
    36. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by cHiphead · · Score: 1

      No, he's just realistic about it. Its not anal penetration prevention, its just protection for the anal cavity itself during the inevitable penetration.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    37. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Draek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ahh screw it, I bend over and grit my teeth. Even prison rape is preferable to dealing with D&D's grapple rules.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    38. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but I bet the CEO of your company isn't trying to kill you.

      With the current work hours, I'm pretty sure he is.

    39. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by westlake · · Score: 1

      The Dungeon Master doesn't tell players what to do, he's asks them what they are going to do, and the DM just tells them the consequences.

      The DM sets the stage and props and scripts the story.

      He plays all the secondary characters.

      He can allow or disallow, reward or punish, any behavior he chooses - and he doesn't have to do it openly.

      He can be "The Master" if he wants to be.

    40. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by srmalloy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Jesus saves,

      Gretzky steals... He shoots... He SCORES!!!

    41. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      A more elaborate wording of what I said, and still nothing like a gang leader. But yeah.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    42. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Yes, the President of your country and CEO of your company are both leaders of gangs. How astute of you to notice.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    43. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      I agree. Football with the team captain and all the players playing their position organizing their plays is a gang activity. Sheesh, when will these Judges grow up?

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    44. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      Jesus saves, but Esposito scores on the rebound!

    45. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more like Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, Boys clubs (club is just another word for gang anyway) of America). In fact by that logic Sam's Club, Player's club, dance club, etc. club should all be banned!

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    46. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by dropzonetoe · · Score: 2

      Shiv - please, ever step on a d4? I still have the scar.

      --
      Look out, you'll shoot Dorkus.
    47. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by unwesen · · Score: 1

      Yes. Yes I did. And IMO Lego pieces are worse, on the whole.

    48. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a close cousin of the "universal solvent"? Perhaps in this case, it acts as a spermicide!

    49. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Fucking BS. I played D&D before going to prison and while incarcerated. (yeah, 15 fucking years for an armed robbery committed when I was 16 years old, and that 15 was how long I did, not my sentence length). And in those years, I met some of the best players and had some of most fun playing that I have ever had. Of course anything that breaks the monotony or steers people away from doing crime is lammed by the DOC because repeated offenders is their bread and butter. And yes, I posted anon for a reason. I was in prison from the age of 16 to 31, and now am somewhat successful in life. Like to avoid the flames.

    50. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by bckrispi · · Score: 2

      Too late! You've already been claimed as a Portable Hole!

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    51. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      It depends on which prison and which security level. Many prisoners are permitted razors. Ponder that one.

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    52. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Dogun · · Score: 1

      This ruling seems to open the door for GMless games, though, as the (INCREDIBLY FLAT) heirarchy is the underpinning of the security concerns claim.

    53. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by amnesia_tc · · Score: 1

      "A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit weighed in Wednesday [that's yesterday]."

      So how is this story "at least a year old"? RTFA!

      This "Wednesday" thing? It occurs once every week. We had not just one, but 52 of them last year! There will also be one next week! Fascinating, I know.

    54. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by fbumg · · Score: 1

      Just like the judge in a courtroom, he tells the trial members what the consequences are. So... Courtroom == D&D == Encourages Gangster Behavior

      --
      I know I don't know what I don't know.
    55. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, but I bet the CEO of your company isn't trying to kill you.

      You must not work for HP.

    56. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Oh and I can't help noticing the description about D&D is reminiscent of ANY organization.

      And "any organization" is exactly in the category of things that I would expect to be forbidden in a prison environment.

      When I am Overlord, my prisons will also be run under the premise that there is one and only one Organization in which the inmates may participate.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    57. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      "A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ganged up on D&D Wednesday [that's yesterday]."

      FTFY

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    58. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      "A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit weighed in Wednesday [that's yesterday]." So how is this story "at least a year old"? RTFA!

      RTFA?

      "ARGUED SEPTEMBER 18, 2009â"DECIDED JANUARY 25, 2010"

      It was "yesterday" ONE YEAR AGO.

    59. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      No, he's just realistic about it.

      He's being realistic about...

      "You are standing in a steamy prison shower, about 15x24' with twelve shower heads lining the walls. Five of them are being used by what appear to be orcish gang members. Make a dexterity check, at minus two due to its slipperiness, to maintain your grip on your soap."

      ...realistic???

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    60. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Jesus saves, and only takes half damage.

    61. Re:Usual Slashdot Timeliness by kamikaze_late2party · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I bet the CEO of your company isn't trying to kill you.

      You must not work for HP.

      I barely made it out alive.

      The hard bit was making the Willpower Saves for Sanity.

  2. Paranoia by Captain+Spam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay, okay, fine. Just have them play Paranoia instead. That oughta screw up the Court of Appeals.

    --
    Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    1. Re:Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aren't also monopolistic practices ruled by court as illegal? Take a guess then what game should be banned too.

    2. Re:Paranoia by Idbar · · Score: 3

      You forget CEOs don't get jail time... They get bonuses. ;)

    3. Re:Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Citizen. You don't seem sufficiently happy about playing Paranoia. Are you feeling all right? Have you had the proper ration of Bouncy Bubbly Beverage this daycycle?

      Please report to the nearest PLC Dispensary for a fresh ration of Happy-Wakey Pills. Please see your nearest HPD&MC Center for Attitude Adjustment to increase your Happy-Wakey Pill ration before going to PLC. Please file the ration increase forms with CPU before going to HPD&MC.

      Happiness is mandatory. Happiness will prevail against the Commie Traitors.

    4. Re:Paranoia by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      Is anyone looking? I am pretending to pretend to be playing paranoia.

    5. Re:Paranoia by jd · · Score: 1

      Depends. If they wear white, they have ultraviolet privs.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that could inspire more prison fights... :P

    7. Re:Paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, okay, fine. Just have them play Paranoia instead. That oughta screw up the Court of Appeals.

      Mandiness is happitory, Citizen!

  3. ...Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have GOT to be kidding me.

  4. srsly? by jaymz666 · · Score: 0

    Is it the 80s again?

  5. This is old news. 1 year ago.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Jan 26. 2010: Seventh Circuit Rules Dungeons & Dragons A Threat to Prison Security

    http://abovethelaw.com/2010/01/seventh-circuit-rules-dungeons-dragons-a-threat-to-prison-security/

  6. do they even RESEARCH? by v1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the DM is anything but a "leader" in D&D. His job is more akin to that of the judges themselves, that passed this retarded ruling.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by dintech · · Score: 1

      Maybe they were worried about the use of D4s as weapons. Dangerous those. You could have an eye out.

    2. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      In the very few games of D&D that I've played the DM was less judge and more executioner. Finding new fun and exciting ways to kill off the party appeared to be his primary purpose, so I guess maybe inquisition age executioner would be even more accurate.

    3. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by patjhal · · Score: 1

      Hear. Hear.

    4. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you can't kill a man with a D20, then you probably wouldn't do so well in prison. =D

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

      Caltrops... you really don't want to step on D4 barefoot.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    6. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      the DM is anything but a "leader" in D&D. His job is more akin to that of the judges themselves, that passed this retarded ruling.

      Have you never DMed or played under one that did quid pro quo trades in game? "Get me a coke for that 15xp you need to get to next level." "Whoever does X, I will give Y." There are plenty of instances where a DM can be a leader or use their position as one of authority. It's just like Farmville. Do this and I will give you this imaginary reward in this imaginary world. But don't think for a second that just because it is imaginary, that it isn't valued. As a DM I've gotten some pretty sweet RL rewards from players for those imaginary rewards.

      Besides that, in a previous article exactly like this one months ago (might have been over on rpg.net), someone working in the corrections system pointed out that the mere gathering of people into groups with pens and papers to plan stuff would pretty much kill any such behavior in most prisons, be it for D&D or a church meeting.

    7. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by bmuon · · Score: 0

      Yeah, DMs aren't leaders. But let's face it, a party is pretty much a gang.

    8. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Take 1d20 hit points, you bastard!!"

    9. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently playing in a Pathfinder campaign with an evil party. There is no "pretty much" aspect to it being a gang, although so far I suppose we've been more of a terrorist cell for hire...

      Posting anon because it occurs to me that calling myself a member of a terrorist cell, even if it's only in the context of a fictional high fantasy universe on Monday nights while consuming Taco Bell and Mountain Dew, is probably best done without any personally identifiable marks.

    10. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by Stregano · · Score: 1

      You mean you are not scared of them getting out and doing a drive-by 12-sided die rolling on you?

      --
      The world is how you make it
    11. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      I already do!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    12. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Most games are more like this. The judge probably got pissed that someone kept drinking his Mountain Dew.

    13. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      And you really, really hope that your fellow prisoners have not heard of the walk of a hundred d4's ...

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    14. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Have you never DMed or played under one that did quid pro quo trades in game? "Get me a coke for that 15xp you need to get to next level." "Whoever does X, I will give Y." There are plenty of instances where a DM can be a leader or use their position as one of authority. It's just like Farmville. Do this and I will give you this imaginary reward in this imaginary world. But don't think for a second that just because it is imaginary, that it isn't valued. As a DM I've gotten some pretty sweet RL rewards from players for those imaginary rewards.

      You're that female DM from the Chick Tracts aren't you?! How could you do that to Marcie?
      http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0046/0046_01.ASP

    15. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      DMs definitely should not be trying to get a TPK (total party kill), and in fact having the party die often is the sign of a REALLY BAD DM.

      That said he's definitely not the leader or the judge. The DM is the SETTING, he's the world. The party is free to organize themselves, and they may elect a leader, but the DM certainly shouldn't be leading them.

      I can only assume that the defense did a terrible job in this case. I don't see how this makes any sense at all.
      If D&D forms gang behavior, then so does BEING LOCKED IN A JAIL TOGETHER.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    16. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      Chick Tracts using ASP... anyone surprised?

    17. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad for you the Feds have had a new post RSS with IP feed going from slashdot for over 10 years now :P

      I'd say shoulda used Tor, but everyone knows the only people who use it are pedophiles and intelligence agents :D

    18. Re:do they even RESEARCH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God forbid they play "US Federal Government" while in prison.
      That's definitely gang-related behavior!

  7. Wow by dintech · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Haven't they got better things to do, like reducing the prevalence of weapons, drugs, alcohol and cellular phones in prisons?

    1. Re:Wow by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Say, could I borrow your... wait, how exactly did you smuggle that in here?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Wow by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Better yet, maybe reduce the prison population in general?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:Wow by dissy · · Score: 0

      Better yet, maybe reduce the prison population in general?

      They can't do that, then they would be required by law to HIRE workers, and pay them minimum wage, and they would be free to quit if they didn't like the working conditions.

      No sir, that would cut WAY into the prison companies profits!

    4. Re:Wow by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      Better yet, maybe reduce the prison population in general?

      That's a dangerous request without qualifiers ;)

    5. Re:Wow by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      maybe reduce the prison population in general?

      Were you thinking height or width?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Wow by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      guys like Richard Speck have access to all the drugs they want in prison
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i725FCBJIxA

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    7. Re:Wow by Miseph · · Score: 1

      Moreover, it would interfere with the real business of private prisons: rent extraction. Of course, the prisoners can't pay rent, so they just charge the government (county, state, federal, it all spends the same) instead. Keeping someone in a maximum security prison for one year is cost comparable to sending them to an elite private college, including room and board, for one year. We could literally send convicted murderers to Harvard for the same price as keeping them in prison.

      Every time somebody claims we can save money by further cutting into public education (as opposed to meaningfully reforming it, which I absolutely support), I literally cringe. Penny wise and pound foolish is no way to improve our standing.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    8. Re:Wow by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      To play DM's advocate:
      An RPG would be a great cover for recruitment and prisoner communication; the DM could hand out assignments under the guise of the game, and be the point of contact for passing messages around. Player stats could easily be used to delineate prison hierarchy, and assigning fixed roles to prisoners in-game could be used for assigning similar roles in prison life (although what your priest/healer/etc is going to do, I have no clue -- work in the infirmary?).

      Not saying that it's ever been used this way, but it *could* -- even though cell phones would be a lot easier.

    9. Re:Wow by Hydian · · Score: 1

      I rolled a 20.

    10. Re:Wow by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Better yet, maybe reduce the prison population in general?

      That's a dangerous request without qualifiers ;)

      Okay. Release all the non-violent drug offenders. Lock up all the mimes.

    11. Re:Wow by SteveFoerster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hope you get the +5 you deserve here. Rampant over-incarceration is one of the biggest social and political problems in the U.S.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    12. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well those things might be dangerous to combat...

      D&D geeks... not so much....

    13. Re:Wow by mcvos · · Score: 1

      And aren't US prisons already rife with gang activity? Would they rather see roleplayers join one of the existing gangs?

    14. Re:Wow by Grygus · · Score: 1

      Every time somebody claims we can save money by further cutting into public education (as opposed to meaningfully reforming it, which I absolutely support), I literally cringe. Penny wise and pound foolish is no way to improve our standing.

      The hard part about education reform is that if the people were smart/educated enough to embrace proper reform, the system would already be fine.

  8. D&D benefits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It leads to staying locked up in the basement with their accomplices so they're out not committing crimes. Problem solved?

    1. Re:D&D benefits by ArcherB · · Score: 1, Troll

      It leads to staying locked up in the basement with their accomplices so they're out not committing crimes. Problem solved?

      It also leads to players getting their asses "kicked" by those that spend their time lifting weights instead of playing D&D.

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    2. Re:D&D benefits by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you assume because one playes D&D one doesn't do the other, or vice versa, that playing D&D alone will get one's ass kicked, or that if it does happen that somebody wants to beat somebody up for playing D&D that the person won't be able to get away or fight at all.

      Assumptions based in stereotypes and not reality.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    3. Re:D&D benefits by ArcherB · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you assume because one playes D&D one doesn't do the other, or vice versa, that playing D&D alone will get one's ass kicked, or that if it does happen that somebody wants to beat somebody up for playing D&D that the person won't be able to get away or fight at all.

      Assumptions based in stereotypes and not reality.

      To both you and whoever modded this "Troll"

      WHOOSH!

      --
      There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  9. Uh yeah... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... hierarchical command structures are everywhere in our society?

    1. Re:Uh yeah... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Including the prison system...

      I think the warden/officer relationship/prisoner relationship is much closer to a gang structure than D&D is.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  10. Is it just me? by Jorl17 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    [Offtopic] Is it just me, or the new Slashdot design seems to have chased away most of the people out there? Most stories are very short on comments! Come on people, get back to trolling and bashing stuff!!

    --
    Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    1. Re:Is it just me? by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      Sir, subscribe me to your gang's newsletter, post haste!!1! Personally, I think they're just lurking in protest because I found them out to be date rapists.

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:Is it just me? by commodore73 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's the design - I think it's the [historic] content.

    3. Re:Is it just me? by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      Considering it now lags to hell on my pc. That could be the case. Its a chore to scroll down through the comments. Chunk by chunk. Text not appearing untill after i type it. WOOO redesign.

    4. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      methinks all the AC's are too scared now.

    5. Re:Is it just me? by tophermeyer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find it harder to read the comment threads with the redesign. As I'm scrolling down I can't tell which comments lead to long threads and which don't, so I find myself skimming through a lot fewer comments and am less tempted to post myself.

    6. Re:Is it just me? by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's plenty of posts, you just can't see them since after the redesign, "abbreviated" comments completely hide all of the comments below them.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    7. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What drove me away (well, nor really away, just into lurk-mode) is that they have apparently removed openID login and I can't be arsed to dig up my slashdot password.

    8. Re:Is it just me? by Jorl17 · · Score: 2

      I tend to disagree. Have you looked at the numbers? There are around 30-50 comments (sometimes they reach 150), when they usually peaked at 200 or more. Might be a work day or just stupid news, but it sounds to me like people have left. I, for one, cannot get myself organized in this whitespace madness (and BIG GUIness).

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    9. Re:Is it just me? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      WHAT?! I can't hear you! Speak up to overcome all the whitespace.

      Actually, I don't get that complaint over the old design. I seem to have the same amount of whitespace. And we all know tech news should be presented in tightly spaced Courier with no paragraph breaks.

    10. Re:Is it just me? by jnpcl · · Score: 0

      strange.. the previous design was laggy as hell for me, but the new one is smooth and responsive.

    11. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is one of the chief problems I have with the new design. One post modded down kills an entire discussion. This stifles discussion (esp. on polarizing issues, where the top "flamebait" to some post spawns interesting counter points). It also make abusive moderation much easier... Don't like the discussion? Just mod the top post "underrated", which I believe doesn't even get metamoderated.

    12. Re:Is it just me? by TheSpoom · · Score: 2

      Same. These grey boxes (especially with the slightly darker grey text within) are really hard on the eyes.

      And the idea that abbreviated comments should completely hide all of their children is poorly conceived at best.

      I can fix the design issues myself in a local stylesheet and release that for anyone interested, but I hope they fix the hidden comments thing.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    13. Re:Is it just me? by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

      I used the comment feature on the RSS a lot. Now, the RSS being so dry, I don't do it so much. Also, the RSS comment's color is a clear grey... over a white background, and it's always incomplete. It annoys me so much I don't even RTFA.

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
    14. Re:Is it just me? by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 1

      Viewing discussions in classic mode (D1) is still decent.

      Ron

    15. Re:Is it just me? by antdude · · Score: 1

      I see a lot of comments in this story.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    16. Re:Is it just me? by spongman · · Score: 1

      install Chrome/Stylish and add this css to a rule for slashdot. it gets rid of most of the extra whitespace.

    17. Re:Is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't access it from work any more. It worked(except for Idle) with IE6 before and now it doesn't.

  11. Just regulate it by MattGWU · · Score: 5, Funny

    So don't let them all play rogues. What's the big deal?

    "Ok, what do you do?"
    "I backstab"
    "Backstab"
    "Um...Backstab?"
    "I shank him"
    "You're not supposed to say it like that! We'll get in trouble"
    "Fine, jeeze...'backstab'"

    --
    "These people look deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined" --Homer re:
    1. Re:Just regulate it by LordNacho · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, and restrict them to lawful alignments...

    2. Re:Just regulate it by mordenkhai · · Score: 0

      Posting to fix mod error, sorry.

    3. Re:Just regulate it by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

      Lawful evil was always one of my favourite alignments

    4. Re:Just regulate it by i_b_don · · Score: 3, Funny

      They had a lawyer class?

      --
      all language nazi's will burne in heil!
    5. Re:Just regulate it by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I see they were playing a historical Imperial Roman era game.

  12. Hockey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    during Hockey games, one player is denoted the "Coach." 'coach is tasked with giving directions to other players, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.'"

    Organization = Gang.

    1. Re:Hockey by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 1
      Even better...

      During an election, one politician is denoted the "President". The President is tasked with giving directions to the country, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.

      They're all criminals anyway, now it's official.

      --
      Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
  13. Dungeons and Dragons Threatens Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Dungeons and Dragons — originally Satan's Game — has now been found to encourage cult-like behavior. In a finding by a three gnome panel, D&D 'can mimic the organization of cults and lead to the actual development thereof.' From the report: 'during D&D games, one player is denoted the "Dungeon Master." 'The Dungeon Master is tasked with playing god, which Wobble Longnose testified mimics the organization of a cult.'"

    1. Re:Dungeons and Dragons Threatens Religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anything that causes oneself to think threatens religion.

      Not that I know whether D&D causes one to think. I was always too afraid of the weirdos who seemed to play it where I lived.

  14. Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I served 15 days in a county Jail (under Huber law) about 15 years ago or so I actually brought a few roleplaying books in with me, and set up a gaming session. (most of the guys in there with me were in for minor drug possession, and quite a few were gamers). I wound up running a 36 hour gaming session where people picked up and left off when they got tired, or had to go to work. It helped pass the time immensely, and gaming made my two weeks in jail go a lot faster than it would have otherwise.

    Don't get me wrong, it was still a terrible experience, and I wouldn't want to go back (and I haven't!). But banning things like D&D isn't going to solve anything.

    1. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It helped pass the time immensely, and gaming made my two weeks in jail go a lot faster than it would have otherwise.

      Sounds like banning D&D is going to solve something.

      People aren't sent to prison to play games and have fun.

    2. Re:Oh please by Lumpy · · Score: 1
      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Oh please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure to ban it for the right reasons, then. e.g. 'it's a game,' rather than 'it causes gangs to form'.

    4. Re:Oh please by the+entropy · · Score: 2

      So why are people sent to prison? Is it some form of torture? Society exacting revenge? Or is it supposed to correct those that can be correct it and at least remove from society those that can't?

      Because if it's the latter, then banning games makes no sense. Having something to occupy their time with can greatly reduce prison violence not the other way around. Too many people with too few things to do all in one place isn't usually ideal as far as not having trouble is concerned.

  15. Being on a judge panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can make you mimic the behavior on a bunch of morons.

  16. What by GlyphedArchitect · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Employer is tasked with giving directions to employees, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.

    The Teacher is tasked with giving directions to students, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.

    The Emergency Broadcast System is tasked with giving directions to the public during an emergency, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.

    Really? When you have criteria for gang behavior that is that loose, anything can be classified and banned.

    The Warden is tasked with giving directions to prisoners, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.

    1. Re:What by jd · · Score: 1

      What does my 20th level hamster (with Power Word Squeak) mimic?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm probably a member of a gang... I'm a shelf-filler at Tesco in the UK....

      The manager tells me what needs to be done during the night, and I do what I can do within the timelimit... That's SO a "gang culture" innit

    3. Re:What by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? When you have criteria for gang behavior that is that loose, anything can be classified and banned.

      What does it say about me that it was only after a moment of habitual, deeply ingrained annoyance that I realized you actually used the word "loose" correctly?

  17. In other news... by NevarMore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...religious services banned in prisons.

    They mimic gang activity, there is a "priest" or "sheik" or "prophet" that tells the other participants how to interpret and act on religious texts

    1. Re:In other news... by countSudoku() · · Score: 0

      +1 magic burning shiv of yard enlightenment

      Personally, I would ban D&D for the obviousness of using 12 and 20 sided die in gambling, and that it could also lead to the purchasing of Magic The Gathering card games. Or worse; Pokémon!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:In other news... by Xphile101361 · · Score: 1

      I think you mean cult. I don't think too many gang leaders are interpreting religious texts for their followers.

    3. Re:In other news... by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Personally, I would ban D&D for the obviousness of using 12 and 20 sided die in gambling, and that it could also lead to the purchasing of Magic The Gathering card games. Or worse; Pokémon!

      Would that be a bit like going from heroin to pot, except less likely? Going from D&D to Pokémon sounds about as likely as Bjarne Stroustrup declaring C++ was a mistake and we should all go use Visual Basic.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:In other news... by NoSig · · Score: 1

      Probably about as many as are DMs in D&D sessions with their gang.

    5. Re:In other news... by Curupira · · Score: 1

      The Boss? Do you work for Bruce Springsteen?

    6. Re:In other news... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately and shockingly, there doesn't appear to be (after quick Google search) any "Church of D&D"...not even in the style of ~dozen relatively widespread parody religions.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    7. Re:In other news... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Which surely isn't a requirement, as far as allowance of religious services in prisons is concerned.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    8. Re:In other news... by John+Saffran · · Score: 1

      That's right .. the chain gang, just like the rest of us

    9. Re:In other news... by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 1

      You dont go to Church do you ?

  18. WTF doesn't even begin to cover this by Ben4jammin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My favorite part:

    but that the game encourages players to become obsessed with mentally escaping the restrictions of prison life

    Because surely it NEVER occurred to inmates to attempt to mentally escape the restrictions of prison life until the DM told them to

    1. Re:WTF doesn't even begin to cover this by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Heck, the act of locking somebody in the prison has all it takes to encourage inmates to become obsessed with mentally escaping the restrictions of prison life.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  19. Dope test the judges. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make them pee in a cup, make the results public.

    1. Re:Dope test the judges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea. But remember: only 2 judges for 1 cup.

  20. Oy by Ignacio · · Score: 1

    What's next, Simon Says?

    1. Re:Oy by CambodiaSam · · Score: 1

      Mod this up

  21. I can see their point by Locke2005 · · Score: 0

    D&D also encourages violence, the drinking of potions, and the accumulation of weapons and body armor!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:I can see their point by JTsyo · · Score: 2

      Not to mention killing things in dungeons and looting them. Dungeons are just what prisons were called in the old days.

  22. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In other news the courts have ruled that businesses also mimick the structure of a gang with the CEO or "Pack Leader" giving directions to the rest of the business and biting the faces of those that disobey.

  23. Haven't you heard?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weebles wobble!

    1. Re:Haven't you heard?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But... But... Do they fall down?

  24. better lock up Tom Hanks! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I thought distributed meshes were the new threat, like al Queada , Anonymous, wikileaks and teh intarwebs ?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  25. Sadism Delight by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Given the inherent need for a good DM to have a streak of sadism, I would think prisons would encourage playing D&D with the guards acting as DM...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  26. Satan's Game? by DragonIV · · Score: 2

    Where the hell (pardon the pun) did "Satan's Game" come from? D&D has always been Dungeons & Dragons since inception. Now get off my lawn!

    1. Re:Satan's Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      This was a reference to a rather infamous bit of audio that was released as a parody of The Watchtower's attack on D&D. You can give it a listen, and I recommend you do. It's quite funny.

    2. Re:Satan's Game? by just_another_sean · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Never saw Mazes and Monsters or saw news (hysteria really) from the 80's about D&D?

      My parents almost made me see a psychiatrist over that crap until my brother and I sat my Mom down and made her play a game with us. We interspersed the play with quips about how it was encouraging us to read, expanding our vocabulary and working our imagination in ways that TV and Video Games never could.

      Can't say I specifically remember "Satan's Game" but doesn't sound far off...

      Wait, is this one of those whooosh moments? Sorry, nm.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    3. Re:Satan's Game? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      It's reference to the beating D&D took during the "Satanic Panic" of the 80s. It was widely blasted for being "Satanic" by even relatively mild religious organizations, and took the blame for a number of suicides and murders. Kinda like video games today. Nobody with any real intelligence took it seriously, but there was plenty of hype and general insanity surrounding the game.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    4. Re:Satan's Game? by DragonIV · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, my parents made me watch Mazes and Monsters with them--and to their credit, they thought the movie was as bad as I thought it was. That was the beginning and end of any Satan Panic in our house, at least up until I went all atheist on them. :) I have no doubt media commentators may have called it Satan's Game back in the day, but Gygax never referred to his game as such that I'm aware of. Thus, it wasn't originally known as such.

    5. Re:Satan's Game? by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      Ah, I got you. I guess I read TFS as saying "orignally called "Satan's Game" [by the idiots who don't understand it]" etc... I immediately flashed back to that wonderful period in the 80's when parents everywhere starting looking at us funny whenever we talked about the game.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    6. Re:Satan's Game? by DragonIV · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't read it as a reference, rather an incorrect assertion by the author. Perhaps due to overdosing on perl coding today, dunno. I was an AD&D DM for most of the early to mid 80s and certainly saw no legit references along those lines back then or prior. Didn't pay much attention to the media whores demonizing the game--they could have called it Dragon Lance for all I cared.

    7. Re:Satan's Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dead Alewives - D&D

    8. Re:Satan's Game? by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2

      Where the hell (pardon the pun) did "Satan's Game" come from? D&D has always been Dungeons & Dragons since inception. Now get off my lawn!

      Are you kidding me?

      D&D suffered from an awful lot of bad press back in the 80's. Lots of folks were claiming it was satanic. I remember getting an awful lot of odd looks from folks when I'd admit to playing. My folks were pretty concerned until I actually showed them the rulebooks.

      They even made a movie about the perils of D&D.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    9. Re:Satan's Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're implying you're old enough to say "get off my lawn," then surely you remember that D&D has always been labeled as "satanic" by the ignorant (church, media, people's family..) It was a joke at that old ignorant label (that I'm sure still exists).

      For example:
      "It ruins people's lives for heaven's sake! Don't you remember Timmy, the Johnson's boy? He got sucked into that game and that's all he ever thought about! He used to play sports, but now he walks around wearing black and army boots, with shirts with dragons, demons and such. He was such a nice boy too *sniffles*"

      You're telling me you've never heard a similar statement?? I have, many times.

      Now, get off my lawn.

    10. Re:Satan's Game? by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      "Mazes and Monsters" came out as a book in 1981, and as a made-for-TV movie in 1982. It is interesting to observe that the satanic child sex abuse witch-hunt (seriously folks - it went into Salem Massachusetts territory) of the 1980s began with the Kern Country case in 1982. There was some "bad craziness" (as Hunter S. Thompson might have said) in the air back then.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    11. Re:Satan's Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do a search for dead ale wives d&d and see what you come up with

    12. Re:Satan's Game? by Itesh · · Score: 2
    13. Re:Satan's Game? by DragonIV · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you and other commentators should see my earlier replies to the first two commentators. But for the record, my first game of AD&D was in '79. I may or may not be as old as you, but get the hell off my lawn anyhow. :)

    14. Re:Satan's Game? by DragonIV · · Score: 1

      I've actually heard that one some time ago, but didn't really recall it. Thanks for the refresher!

    15. Re:Satan's Game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps you should watch this... It's a 8 Bit reenactment of an DnD session.. Quite funny.

      8bit DnD

      I wannna cast a spell

  27. Pac-Man ruined my life by MoldySpore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Got me into eating small white pills. And don't even get me started on "candy"-land. And Battleship? I heard it trains terrorists on how to sink ships.

    Honestly, they can find the most ridiculous things to try and turn something harmless into a big deal. D&D is not what created gangs. Gangs create gangs. And they certainly aren't running around screaming "lightning bolt" and talking about going into unexplored caves to find treasure out on the streets. This is beyond hilarious for anyone who has any kind of knowledge of both D&D and gang-related activities.

    --

    "I hope you know how very lucky you are to know me, because I am so incredibly incredible."

    1. Re:Pac-Man ruined my life by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      Gangs create gangs. And they certainly aren't running around screaming "lightning bolt"

      You've never watched Reno 911 have you? Our law enforcement officers have to deal with anachronistic ruffians shouting "lightning bolt" regularly.

    2. Re:Pac-Man ruined my life by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      D&D is not what created gangs. Gangs create gangs. .

      Then where did the first one come from?

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  28. Of course they got it wrong by DreamArcher · · Score: 2

    I really don't care about criminals rights, but the court got it wrong. The dungeon master is not the leader of the party and does not give orders or directions. DM represents an interface to the world. The party makes their own decision.

    1. Re:Of course they got it wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't care about criminals rights

      Idiot.

    2. Re:Of course they got it wrong by DreamArcher · · Score: 0

      You've done jail-time haven't you. You were wrongly convicted like all criminals. Don't lie. It's OK, you'll feel better tomorrow.

    3. Re:Of course they got it wrong by Thing+1 · · Score: 2

      I really don't care about criminals rights

      You should; "there but for the grace of a pissed-off investigator, go I."

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    4. Re:Of course they got it wrong by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Where was the assertion that all criminals are imprisoned wrongly made?

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  29. Let's be clear by cfulmer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The 7th circuit did *not* find that D&D encourages gang-like behavior. What it found is that this prisoner didn't provide any relevant evidence that it doesn't encourage gang-like behavior. Basically, the warden said "Hey, this sort of thing looks like something which could encourage gangs -- it mimics human interaction. So, we're banning it." The inmate could have gone out and found other wardens who said "No, we've had it in our prison, and it's been fine." But, he didn't. Instead, he found other inmates (or former inmates). And that's not good enough.

    1. Re:Let's be clear by royallthefourth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The inmate could have gone out and found other wardens

      No, he couldn't have gone out anywhere. He's imprisoned.

    2. Re:Let's be clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inmate could have gone out and found other wardens

      Pssst. Prison.

    3. Re:Let's be clear by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      What it found is that this prisoner didn't provide any relevant evidence that it doesn't encourage gang-like behavior.

      So he failed to prove a negative. No surprise there.

      The inmate could have gone out and...

      Let's first be clear on the definition of "prison".

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:Let's be clear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inmate could have gone out

      That's a very interesting prison. Please tell me more.

    5. Re:Let's be clear by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      So perhaps human interaction (in prisons) should be banned by the 7th circuit?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    6. Re:Let's be clear by cfulmer · · Score: 1

      So... Poor choice of words on "could have gone out and . . ." But, the point is the same. He doesn't need to prove a negative; he only needed to show some evidence -- his LAWYER could have gone out and gotten other wardens to give affidavits that it didn't lead to gang behavior. There is a presumption that the government knows the best way to run a prison. So, when an inmate wants to challenge some rule, he has to at least present some valid evidence that the rule doesn't make sense. He didn't in this case, so he lost.

    7. Re:Let's be clear by luther349 · · Score: 1

      it does get banned when you do bad things in prision ever herd to salutary confiment.

    8. Re:Let's be clear by gnarfel · · Score: 1

      Just be back by dinner!

      --
      Local music(to upstate NY). http://gnarfel.com/ radio.
    9. Re:Let's be clear by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Is that where a roving band of Spanish-imprisoned herbivores gives you a military salute in a comfortable setting?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    10. Re:Let's be clear by Kennita · · Score: 1

      His lawyer? Probably the reason he's in prison is that he had a public defender, and those guys are way too busy to mess with complaints over what games inmates are allowed to play..

  30. Shadowrun by drunken-yeti · · Score: 0

    They should just throw in the towl and play Shadowrun...probally be able to get someone on the outside to pick up all the books at a thriftstrore too.

  31. Boots of Escapement by kilgortrout · · Score: 1

    Not the real reason. They are worried about the inmates getting boots of escapement: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxF0vygnF2Y

  32. The Bloods and the Crypts by bdh61 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure this is just how the Bloods and the Crypts got started!

  33. I hope they also banned by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    I hope they also banned pasta, because that leads to Italian Mafia.Just look at all those mafia movies, and they all seem to have at least one pasta eating scene. No spaghetti for prisoners, because they can dry it out to make skeleton keys.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  34. D&D in prison? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think they meant "encourages gang rape".

    Dont drop the 20-sided soap!

  35. Re:This is old news. 1 year ago.. by just_another_sean · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is the appeal of that case. The initial ruling was upheld yesterday.

    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  36. Church by subgame · · Score: 1

    Don't churches form groups the same way? Better not hold any form of religious meetings in prison either!

  37. DM as gangleader just like ... by alangerow · · Score: 1

    a coach on a sports team ... a boss at a job ... the chief of police to the officers. How dare someone be in charge of a situation. Are they advocating anarchy?

    1. Re:DM as gangleader just like ... by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Believe it or not, prisoners aren't allowed to be coaches, bosses, or chiefs of police either.

  38. haha by nomadic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A while ago I had a case before the trial judge here. Knowing his personality, and age, it amuses me to no end to imagine the efforts the prisoners must have gone through to explain to him what Dungeons and Dragons is.

    1. Re:haha by alexo · · Score: 1

      A while ago I had a case before the trial judge here. Knowing his personality, and age, it amuses me to no end to imagine the efforts the prisoners must have gone through to explain to him what Dungeons and Dragons is.

      You are reading a story to your grandchildren. They like it so much that they suggest playing it out. Samantha wants to be the princess while Jimmy wants to be dragon-fighting knight. You, obviously, get to be the dragon. Since your joints are not what they used to be, you suggest that instead of going outside and letting Jimmy whack you over the head with a broomstick (sorry, a magical sword), you all sit around the table and say aloud what each of you does. At first that goes well until Jimmy says that he is "dragon proof" and kills dragons just by looking at them, while Samantha, feeling that this is just silly, declares she found a magic wand inside the dragon cave which turned Jimmy into a frog. You decide that to inject some common sense into the game, somebody needs to be an arbiter of what is plausible (within the game) and what is not. That brings the game on track again until Samantha complains that one of your decision was arbitrary. To avoid such accusations in the future, you write down the most important rules and assumptions that everyone can agree on. You also assign rough probability numbers for actions and events and use random dice to determine outcomes. After some additional refinements, you find out that somebody already did all this work for you and published it in a book, so you buy the book, let the kids read it, then grab a bunch of dice and let them again pretend to be knights and princesses but in a more structured setting.

      Not so hard, was it?

    2. Re:haha by nomadic · · Score: 1

      The judge would have stopped you after the first sentence and said he didn't want to hear all that.

  39. "Gang structures" is just human nature. by Securityemo · · Score: 1

    People in gangs reject society, and create their own. Now, what could be more natural society to create for a group of men than an informal but still very hierarchial one where everyone's heavily armed?

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
  40. In a related ruling... by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    In a related ruling, the court banned standing in queues for food in the cafeteria, because it mimics doing the bunny-hop. And spooning.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  41. Get a grip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My God they're RIGHT! One person is giving order/direction to others... So wait does that mean that Theater troupes, Plays or Chiors who have "Directors" giving commands to the organized units are also gang promoting? Why even educational Classes with their so called TEACHERS promote group structure... And it's so insidious; that this group hierarchy has even invaded churches which are structured not only like a gangs at the low level but as an entire MOB with Priests reporting to Bishops who ultimately report to a single POPE {/sarcasm}

  42. I'm just saying... by tiptone · · Score: 1

    "The Dungeon Master is tasked with giving directions to other players, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang."

    Or a corporation.

    --
    Please don't read my sig.
  43. Generalize much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'The Dungeon Master is tasked with giving directions to other players, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.'

    'The Manager is tasked with giving directions to other employees, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.'

    'The Scout Master is tasked with giving directions to other Scouts, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.'

    'The NCO is tasked with giving directions to other enlisted members, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.'

    'The Principal is tasked with giving directions to other teachers, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.' ...ad nauseum

  44. Idiot logic at work by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    There, an expert on prison gangs argued not only that having a Dungeon Master issue direction to other players “mimics the organization of a gang”, but that the game encourages players to become obsessed with mentally escaping the restrictions of prison life, which could threaten “the safety and security of the institution.”

    As opposed to leaving them in the courtyard to look at the outside, separated from society by armed guards and chainlink fences?

  45. oh for goodness' sake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in other news, bears shit in the woods and the pope really is catholic, but putting expensive items for sale in the windows of shops leads to people stealing them because they're there and guns might not kill people but the flaming supersonic hot pieces of lead sure do help more than shouting bang! really loudly.

  46. Can't help but be reminded of an old quote by istartedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A midshipman at the US Naval Academy was asked what the difference was between being in the Navy or a gang. He thought for a moment and said, "we have uniforms". It was the Washington Post, IIRC, and for all I know it may have been fabricated by the same reporter who wrote "Jimmy's World, the story of a 9 year old heroin addict".

    It still has a ring of truth to it though.

    So yeah, every social order is gang if you want to look at it that way. Did any of these people making the call actually, you know, check to see if DD players in prison were getting into more trouble, or less trouble?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Can't help but be reminded of an old quote by wolfemi1 · · Score: 2

      As a former sailor, I think the actual answer is "Our guns are bigger." :)

    2. Re:Can't help but be reminded of an old quote by Kevin+Fishburne · · Score: 1

      I think your sig meant, "...intents and purposes..." but who cares? ;)

      --
      Buy your next Linux PC at eightvirtues.com
  47. Judges reasoning flawed. by meerling · · Score: 1

    That judge is going to have to ban all group activities with that logic. No basketball, or other sports, no quilting bees, no prison work groups, no film making, no year book, no cheerleading, no anything that has somebody directing/leading/refereeing that includes multiple people.

    Ok, I listed some retirement home stuff and school stuff, but then again I'm pointing out how stupid the judges idea of things that leads to gang-like-behavior is. Additionally, I have no idea what people do in prison other than the tropes TV tells me such as basketball, weightlifting, and riots. TV sucks for accuracy, I'd have never guessed anyone played pnp rpgs there.

    1. Re:Judges reasoning flawed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing makes running a prison more managable than having all the prisons constantly idle and bored.

      TV is a great source of information on the real world by the way. All computer screens display like teletypes (including printing noises), all emergency rooms are constantly busy with critical cases and the staff making out on the side, and all prisons are full of crazed child killers who just sit in front of the bars foaming at the mouth.

  48. This Just In... by MDillenbeck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Courts rule that political parties are now illegal in the prison systems. Democrats, Republicans, Greens, Libertarians, and so forth are obviously modeled after gang organizations, and thus should be allowed. Especially those Tea Party-ers who like to engage in an activity they dub "tea bagging" - which in a prison is just wrong on so many levels.

    1. Re:This Just In... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank god. When are they going to get around to outlawing it outside of prison?

    2. Re:This Just In... by PMuse · · Score: 1

      In a follow-on case, the court banned the formation of sports teams on the grounds that they mimicked military "squads" in their structure and emphasis on physical training and executing planned maneuvers in concert.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    3. Re:This Just In... by The+Grand+Falloon · · Score: 1

      ...shortly thereafter, the inmates of the US Prison system developed an effective working democracy. Officials quickly responded by requiring all inmates to register as Democrats or Republicans.

  49. DM Gang Leaders by medv4380 · · Score: 1

    If DM's were gang leaders their gangs would have to come though scores of instant death traps just to have an audience.

  50. Who Knew by mattwrock · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was gangsta way back in 81'. Suck on it bitches, the druid's in da house!

    --
    "Ones and zeros were everywhere. I even think I saw a two!" - Bender
  51. err, myself excluded, obviously... by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Make them pee in a cup, make the results public.

    That should be mandatory for all bureaucrats and elected officials. And anybody else that wants to inflict drug testing on someone else.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:err, myself excluded, obviously... by UdoKeir · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see mandatory alcohol testing before legislation is voted on.

    2. Re:err, myself excluded, obviously... by Maclir · · Score: 1

      Which certainly applies at the court where I work in Florida - we are all subject to pre-employment drug tests, and random drug test - the "pee in the cup" type as a condition of employment. Fail the test, and you're out of a job.

    3. Re:err, myself excluded, obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make them pee in a cup, make the results public.

      That should be mandatory for all bureaucrats and elected officials.

      I'm going to go the other way on this one, why don't we let consulting adults do what they want behind closed doors [so long as it doesn't effect anyone else]. When

    4. Re:err, myself excluded, obviously... by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

      or a mandatory test of comprehension in regards to what is being voted on (i.e. if it was read or not).

      --
      ...
    5. Re:err, myself excluded, obviously... by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

      that dude rolled a 20! i say it's because of drugs!

  52. This here is the devil's work! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pat Robertson told me this is the work of the devil. That and those evil skirts those sin'n woman of ill repute wear and that demon liquor that poisons good church goin' men folk.

  53. WTF?? by sshirley · · Score: 1

    WTF?!?!?! Seriously??? Some people are stupid.

  54. Awful Arguments by Rydia · · Score: 5, Informative

    I actually watched the oral argument for this case, and the appointed counsel did a really hideous job ... one of the judges (based on the testimony of the correctional officer at trial) was talking about "escapism" being a problem that was promoted by dungeons and dragons, as in it would actually lead to the players escaping from the jail. The attorney completely missed this, didn't even familiarize himself with the material that was being discussed, and generally did a half-assed job of informing the court, which also admitted they had no idea how the game worked or what its implications were. I only partially blame the judges -- after all, part of your job is to inform the court of your arguments and interpretations of facts. That's what an oral argument is for.

    So yes, "escapism" is a real problem. I expect the next things to be banned in the seventh circuit to be books, closely followed by looking out the window, closely followed by thinking.

    Anyway, the judges have betrayed two things:

    1. They have never been in a gang, because gang heirarchy doesn't work that way.
    2. They have never played Dungeons & Dragons, because they think people actually listen to the DM.

    1. Re:Awful Arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I spent a few days in a county jail a couple of years ago and I was actually NOT allowed to look out the window.

    2. Re:Awful Arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They have never played Dungeons & Dragons

      Judges can't be wrong all the time.

    3. Re:Awful Arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have never played Dungeons & Dragons, because they think people actually listen to the DM.

      Too true.
      "What do you mean a 16 doesn't hit? How the hell am I supposed to fight an ogre if I can't even hit him; why *can't* I backstab with a greatsword?; That's not how that spell works, read the description again; you didn't even tell me to roll to see if I knew he was lying. This game is bullshit!"

    4. Re:Awful Arguments by Renraku · · Score: 1

      This is typical of judicial behavior.

      For example, you can get put in jail for not paying your child support on time. The reasoning is because obviously you have the money you're just being greedy with it and not wanting to pay it up. This is pretty much unchallenged because no judges have ever had to try to pay child support when they're unemployed and have to choose between going hungry or going to jail.

      Another example is how judges can decide that it's legal to arrest people for filming police officers because neither they or their friends have ever been the target of police brutality or straight up theft by the police.

      Judges are so fucking disconnected from the real society the majority of us live in. Just like how the people that write and make laws are so fucking disconnected from the real world as well.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    5. Re:Awful Arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Escapism" means the players involved are using their imaginations to entertain and immerse themselves in a fantasy world.

      Just like movies, video games, and *gasp* ... books.

      "Escapism" does not mean they are plotting how to "escape jail". In fact, the ability to let your mind be engaged into something fun lessens the likelihood they would go stir-crazy while behind bars and act aggressively.

    6. Re:Awful Arguments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately that doesn't excuse them from the bad arguments made in their rulings. For example, the same descriptions the judges used can be applied to Football game or hockey games. Hence - no more Superbowl in prison!

  55. Uh what about chess? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh what about chess, is that next target of paranoid demonization? Oh wait, I said target. That's violent rhetoric. I apologize... I'm really trying to get better, honest.

  56. A bunch of geeks turn gangsters? by drgregoryhouse · · Score: 1

    That will make a good hollywood movie. More likely a comedy.

  57. HA HA HA by sxmjmae · · Score: 2

    HA HA HA.
    The prison guard tell them what to do all the time - the whole system is just a big gang.

    I think the same can be said about the government. After all the US President is tasked with giving directions and his fellow gang members try to achieve the goals. Although there are two gangs running the country both are just legitimized organized criminal gangs. Pay your protection money, I mean taxes!

    --
    My Sig indicates the end of the comment I posted.
    1. Re:HA HA HA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA HA. The prison guard tell them what to do all the time - the whole system is just a big gang.

      I think the same can be said about the government. After all the US President is tasked with giving directions and his fellow gang members try to achieve the goals. Although there are two gangs running the country both are just legitimized organized criminal gangs. Pay your protection money, I mean taxes!

      Rings soooo true. After all US is a deportation colony... very unfortunate for the rest of the world that their gang behaviour couldn't be contained in America.

  58. The real question... by CdrGlork · · Score: 1

    How many experience points is a prison guard worth? I really need to gain that level so I can finally get my "Weapon Focus (Shiv)" feat.

  59. my gang by Ogive17 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, my gang and I will be getting together this weekend to try and tackle the Tomb of Horrors. Hope the cops don't show up and bust us like they kicked us off a frozen pond while playing hockey a few weekends ago.

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    1. Re:my gang by Confusador · · Score: 1

      I don't know, man, with Tomb of Horrors a night in lockup might be a welcome relief.

  60. I think a lot more comments are getting hidden by sean.peters · · Score: 2

    I noticed that I started getting way, way fewer replies to my comments than normal, and when I went to look for my comments... they were invisible. Not modded down - most were still 2's. But you couldn't see them. Not sure what's going on.

  61. JEALOUS! The Warden is protecting his turf, yo. by Infirmo · · Score: 1

    In D&D, the Dungeon Master isn't the leader. He's the opposition.
    A dungeon is a kind of prison:
    http://thesaurus.com/browse/dungeon
    So, what is a warden, if not the master of a dungeon?

    "Some people are opposed to the death penalty because it makes the state into a murderer. I'm opposed to the prison system, because it turns the state into a gay dungeonmaster."
          -Emo Philips

  62. Re:This is old news. 1 year ago.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, the one originally reported on was the appeal. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/27/us/27dungeons.html

  63. DnD In Prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    A gamer buddy of mine actual was in jail for a few years and game mastered plenty of games while he was incarcerated.

    He said the escapism allowed by DnD or tabletop rpgs in general was one of the few things lifetimers had to look forward to while behind bars. I'm talking about stonecold killers with a lifetime of no parole. For a few, it was the only thing they had to look forward to in life. (You can easily argue that they don't deserve the fun they are having but that isn't what I'm trying to say.)

    I think the courts are getting the wrong impression from what he told me. For example, when a player greets another player out in the yard and says "what up Olondir?" (referring to the player's character) he isn't referring to a gang name. They just have so much fun playing that they refer to each other by character names in real life.

  64. Justified? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So were you really a criminal who posed an actual threat to others or just there for committing a crime against the state (i.e. drug offense)? (To those who aren't aware, the majority of US prisoners are non-violent and pose no threat to anyone but the status quo.)

    1. Re:Justified? by daemonhunter · · Score: 1

      (To those who aren't aware, the majority of US prisoners are non-violent and pose no threat to anyone but the status quo.)

      [citation needed]

  65. dangerous by jqh1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yup - that was me - 13 years old, with a stack of graph paper, a bunch of pencils, and a bag of funny shaped dice. 100% pure gangsta!

    --
    who's moderating the meta-moderators?
    1. Re:dangerous by dcollins · · Score: 2

      You know, when I was 15 I actually did have a cop pull into my driveway behind my truck, flash his lights, and accuse me of illegally hunting deer... with said graph paper, D&D books, and pencils on the seat beside me.

      Of course, it was really part of a harassment campaign of my whole family by local cops after my dad confronted the chief of police at a town hall meeting, but still... Did not like that campaign at all.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    2. Re:dangerous by Kittenman · · Score: 1
      When I was a lad, local wargaming clubs (we played boardgames: mainly the SPI ones, such as "Drang Nach Osten", "Terrible Swift Sword", etc) used to get picketed by the local villagers (with pitchforks and torches) accusing us of being warmongers. Really. Bizarre.

      People are idiots, really.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:dangerous by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

      Life aint nuthin but CR5 Encounters & Money.

    4. Re:dangerous by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

      but still... Did not like that campaign at all.

      Dude, get a new DM!

    5. Re:dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you never know when an inmate is going to backstab the warden with a ballista. Seriously though, the judge only needs to watch the movie Gamerz once to get an idea how ridiculous this argument is.

  66. Wait a second by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gang-"like" behavior? Because there are no gangs in prison? Or because the court would rather the inmate join a real gang than a D&D party? Is there a ban on team sports in jail too, because that's gang-like behavior too...

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Wait a second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a Knights of the Dinner Table comic where a couple lowlifes in a bar mistook Weird Pete's "cattle punk" game session for a planning session for an actual bank robbery. One of them tried to join in, while the other called a tip line hoping for a reward for ratting them out.

      I suspect this case is a similar scenario. The warden confused their game with a veiled attempt at planning an escape. When challenged by the inmates he then used every justification he could think of for banning the game so as not to have to admit his error.

  67. See Source... by Haedrian · · Score: 2

    Don't these people research or anything?

    Oh right. Fox news. Carry on.

    1. Re:See Source... by dcollins · · Score: 1

      The better sources are the links within TFA:
      - Official ruling (1st line is a beauty): http://abovethelaw.com/_old/2010/01/26/Singer%20v.%20Raemisch.pdf
      - Commentary at GeeksAreSexy: http://www.geeksaresexy.net/2011/01/25/dungeons-dragons-a-threat-to-prison-security/

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    2. Re:See Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fox News didn't make this decision, they're just reporting it.

    3. Re:See Source... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is also listed under the topic "Technology".

      The poster referring to DND as " Satan's Game", appears to be a random blog like listing on the urban dictionary:

      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=satan%27s%20game

      "Dungeons and Dragons, Satan's game. Your children, like it or not, are attracted in their weaker years to the occult, and a game like DnD fuels their imagination and makes them feel special while drawing them deeper and deeper into the bowels of El Diablo."

      "This afternoon the dead alewives watch tower invites you to sit in on an actual gaming session. Observe the previously unobservable as a hidden camera takes you to the inner sanctum of Dungeons and Dragons."
      by Jesse Radin

  68. With a slight change ... by neonv · · Score: 1

    "Dungeons and Dragons — originally Satan's Game — has now been found to encourage government-like behavior. In a finding by a three judge panel of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, D&D 'can mimic the organization of government and lead to the actual development thereof.' From the ruling: 'during D&D games, one player is denoted the "Dungeon Master." 'The Dungeon Master is tasked with giving directions to other players, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a government.'"

    We can't have any leaders in prison, that's just evil!!!!

  69. In other news... by anyGould · · Score: 2

    during work hours, one player is denoted the "Boss." 'The Boss is tasked with giving directions to other players, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.'"

    OMG - I'm in a gang too!

  70. The Stupid Factor by b4upoo · · Score: 2

    Does electing the leader of a basketball team, a football team, or the state governor not also teach the formation of a gang? Another waste of taxpayer dollars by people who do no real work but seek to be the moral guardians of us all is in play.

  71. Dungeon Master responsibilities by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    "The Dungeon Master doesn't tell players what to do, he's asks them what they are going to do, and the DM just tells them the consequences."

    Not so. The Dungeon Master -- in my experience, anyway -- must take an active role as lead storyteller in the collective storytelling of D&D (or other role playing game).

    The D.M. should appear to be impartial, aloof, merely telling players the consequences ... while gently maneuvering the players in order to keep the game running smoothly.

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Dungeon Master responsibilities by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      "The Dungeon Master doesn't tell players what to do, he's asks them what they are going to do, and the DM just tells them the consequences."

      Not so. The Dungeon Master -- in my experience, anyway -- must take an active role as lead storyteller in the collective storytelling of D&D (or other role playing game).

      The D.M. should appear to be impartial, aloof, merely telling players the consequences ... while gently maneuvering the players in order to keep the game running smoothly.

      Yes so. You do that by carefully controlling the consequences for actions and the events that transpire.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Dungeon Master responsibilities by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      The D.M. should appear to be impartial, aloof, merely telling players the consequences ... while gently maneuvering the players in order to keep the game running smoothly.

      I hate DMs like that. "I already have an idea of what I want your characters to do, and no matter what you want, I'll ruin it because otherwise you'll ruin my finely crafted story that took me months to write down, complete with [N]PC dialogue". Meh. Create a world, populate it with people, monsters, and a few villains, and see what happens. If I want to spend a year making a magic item while the fighter spends a year training new hirelings in combat techniques, and the cleric spends a year in devotions, don't have the main villain attack our town a month into the down-time with an army of giants unless he was planning to anyway. Say "time passes" and tell us about all the boring stuff that barely happened, whetting our appetites for adventure instead of dragging us kicking and screaming to defeat the ancient evil because apparently only we can.

    3. Re:Dungeon Master responsibilities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JourneyQuest and it's predecessor webisodes 'The Gamers' and 'The Gamers: Dorkness Rising' have quite a bit of fun lampooning that exact DM behavior. I mostly bring this up because they're only at 9.5k/100k towards doing a second season and given that it's been a good 4+ months I figured reminding members of the slashdot crowd of it might get them some funding (I wanna see more eps, but am too broke to chip in!!)

      Judging by a lot of the other comments here, it does seem amusing that D&D is frowned upon when so many other PRISON ACTIVITIES invoke the EXACT SAME BEHAVIOR. I mean seriously, just about any sport other than tetherball is team based, and almost all of them involve a leader or coach for each side directing strategy.

    4. Re:Dungeon Master responsibilities by Dogun · · Score: 1

      The GMs job is to find a way to say 'Yes', and if he can't, find a way to get someone to say something he can say 'Yes' to.

  72. Monopoly by slugabed · · Score: 0

    In that case they can't play monopoly either since the banker would fill a similar role.

  73. Prison D&D Supplemental Amendments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 shiv
    Coolhand Luke of Venca
    Chair of Lighting
    Keep on the Shawshank
    Temple of Correctional Evil
    Save vs. Parole
    Orb of Solitary Confinement
    Lair of the Demi-Bitch
    Carton of Cigarettes..... 15 gp

  74. This will lead to precedence by Draasti · · Score: 1

    Probably they will ban "Clue", "Monopoly" and others "dangerous" games.

  75. The all knowing court system. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kinda lame... I played D&D alot as a kid... Never joined a gang, or killed anyone... yet :)

  76. Dead Alewives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, there are a ton of people that seem to be completely missing the 'Satan's Game' reference. Go look up Dead Alewives. They did a skit that started with the words "Dungeons and Dragons, Satan's game"

    1. Re:Dead Alewives by Psmylie · · Score: 1

      Seriously, there are a ton of people that seem to be completely missing the 'Satan's Game' reference. Go look up Dead Alewives. They did a skit that started with the words "Dungeons and Dragons, Satan's game"

      To be fair, it was called things similar to that before the skit. But yes, that skit is hilarious.
      For those too lazy too head to youtube and look up "Dead Alewives" and "Dungeons and Dragons", here's a link to an 8-bit version that someone made, based off the original audio:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHdXG2gV01k

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

  77. One thing being overlooked: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I'm too late to quell the "OH NOES! D&D ISN'T GANG LIKE BEHAVIOR!" tirades of fellow gamers, but let's not lose perspective.

    The prisoners are there for a reason and I don’t think restricting their gaming sessions is going to qualify as ‘cruel and unusual punishment’.

  78. Colour me shocked! by qeveren · · Score: 2

    Oh my god!!! Gang-like behaviour in a prison!! It must be that Satanic game's fault!

    Seriously? Money and time got spent on this? Why do they allow sports in prison then? Obviously having a team captain and/or coach mimics gang-like behaviour!

    --
    Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
  79. Just need to change the terminology... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    The prisoner should have said it doesn't encourage "gangs" - but rather it encourages parties!

    While still being clueless on the details and unwilling to understand it any better, the judge would have been forced to conclude that "this game is off the hook, the bomb, and a real rager" and then join the inmates in a round of kamikazees.

  80. Old news is old... by kiveya · · Score: 1

    ...and I liked how Penny Arcade nailed it then, the strip is from January 27, 2010.

  81. Re:This is old news. 1 year ago.. by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

    Well TFA (Fox News so they could be as wrong as you seem to think I am) says this:

    Published January 26, 2011 | FoxNews.com

    A three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit weighed in Wednesday on a matter of grievous import to the nation's prisons: Dungeons & Dragons. And the Court's ruling was bad news for naughty nerds nationwide, concluding that the innocent-seeming board game was inviting trouble.

    Emphasis mine. And, BTW, since when does being wrong on /. deserve a Troll mod? It's not like I was deliberately trying to mislead people. My comment was based on my understanding of the situation from RTFA. Ah, well I guess I'll just go crawl under my bridge and forget about it.

    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  82. That makes perfect sense! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    > 'The Dungeon Master is tasked with giving directions to other players, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.'"

    It also mimics the organization of.... FOOTBALL.

    Or wait, hang on, I got it:

    High school football has now been found to encourage gang-like behavior. "The quarterback is tasked with giving directions to other players, which mimics the organization of a gang".

    Or, let's go at it from another direction.

    Muraski claims that those pasty-faced guys in XXXL cargo pants and severely overstretched "Green Lantern" t-shirts you see rolling funny dice at the comic store are just one step away from roaming the streets wrecking terror and mayhem on the populace at large. If they can just catch their breath.

    Or, let's try it this way.

    Muraski claims that young adults with the predilection to violent behavior and a tendency to roam the streets in groups, are attracted to a geeky game played almost entirely by out-of-shape nerds with no social skills.

    Ok, one more.

    Muraski testifies to the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals that teamwork is antisocial behavior and should be discouraged whenever possible.

    Sure, I'll buy that...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  83. Its prison by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Why are they being allowed to play games in the first place?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Its prison by Yosho · · Score: 1

      What would you rather they do all day? Sit in their cells, bored out of their minds, thinking about how to get revenge on whoever put them in there when they're finally released with years of built-up stress?

      --
      Karma: Terrifying (mostly affected by atrocities you've committed)
    2. Re:Its prison by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      No, id like them to be doing actual labor, to help pay back their victims and society for their crime and cost of incarceration

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Its prison by Psmylie · · Score: 1

      No, id like them to be doing actual labor, to help pay back their victims and society for their crime and cost of incarceration

      I agree, but of course the work should be voluntary, for only one reason: forced work, even of prisoners, is basically slavery, which I'm against on general principals.

      I'm not too familiar with the prison system, but giving people perks like better food, more TV time, internet usage (monitored, of course) for working to repay their debt to their victims and society seems like a good idea to me. Set the idea that work = reward, so that when they're released they (hopefully) won't run out and immediately start mugging people or robbing places or whatever.

      Probably won't work... ex-cons tend to have a hard time getting work. But heck, it's worth a shot.

      Also, having privileges gives the authorities another way to punish prisoners. Privileges can be taken away. Someone with nothing to lose is much harder to discipline.

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

  84. Better not let them play Bridge, either by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    They better not let them play bridge or any other card game, either. Because whoever wins the bid is able to declare trump and gives instruction to other palyers -- mimicking the organization of a gang.

    Better not let them go to church or prayer groups, because that, too, is an organized group that follows a leader, mimicking the organization of a gang.

    No, instead, let's keep them all couped up, doing nothing so they get frustrated and take that frustration out on each other or the guards. That won't be mimicking a gang, just gang warfare. A much better solution.

  85. Why is this modded up? by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

    From the cited documents

    "ARGUED SEPTEMBER 18, 2009â"DECIDED JANUARY 25, 2010"

    http://abovethelaw.com/_old/2010/01/26/Singer%20v.%20Raemisch.pdf

  86. Idiots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's obvious that PRISONERS threaten prison security... way to go judge.

  87. Judge would be the last... by Plugh · · Score: 1

    ... people to grok that the DM creates the fantasy world; he does not direct its inhabitants (known to Satan's Worshippers as "PCs")

    It is completely outside a Judge's experience that humans lie outside his ability to direct.
    Jury Nullification, baby.

    1. Re:Judge would be the last... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      DMs certainly can "direct" their player characters.

      DM: You're in a bar, a fight breaks out.
      Player: I tumbe over the table, sloshing my steaming drink into the orc's face and pinning the shifty-looking elf's hand to the table with my dagger.

      The DM can choose to react in many ways. Here's some wildly different examples.

      1) Awesome. Roll some to-hits, use a karma die, whatever. Rule of Cool, baby. "The Orc staggers backwards, cursing loudly. He's mad at you now, but you did a small bit of damage. You miss the elf's hand, but pin his sleeve to the table. He spends the next round pulling the dagger out instead of attacking you."
      -- This let's the player Do Cool Stuff and still have consequences. In this case, the DM and player are collaborating to tell a story.

      2) Let's see ... you'll need to make an acrobatics check (you're trained, so it's only at a -2 penalty), and you'll need to treat it as a double attack, so -8 and -4 to the rolls since you're not ambidextrous. Also, throwing your drink is a ranged attack in melee range, so let's roll up some attacks of opportunity...
      -- This is GM-speak for "I didn't want you to do that, let's see if you either die or do what I want first." In this case, the DM is acting as the player's adversary. They could just as easily say things like "sorry the chandelier is too high to reach", or "The Duke is immune to poisons".

  88. Never Witnessed the Act by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    I remember in high school I told my parents we were going to play Dungeons and Dragons at our house over the weekend. My mom thought we were all going to commit suicide (or have an orgy since I had recently told her I liked guys). Both were extremely scary to her.

    When she and my father eventually saw what playing was like they got bored and went back to watching Law & Order. These judges probably have never witnessed a D&D game, much less watched Law & Order.

  89. A cruicial bit of information not provided... by Scragglykat · · Score: 1

    ...are these gangs lawful-good?

  90. It's not organization they fear, it's creativity. by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

    Ever notice how any sort of authoritarian organization absolutely fears anything that deals with giving people imagination and creativity. From the church to the government to the corporations, I've noticed time and time again the abject fear of anything that gives creative power to the individual. Corporations tend to allow creativity with strict controls over it, and the church is the absolute worst about accepting any sort of creative ideas. (ironic)

  91. wait...if this guy tell us what to do...oh.. by snemiro · · Score: 1

    Really? what a waste of time and resources.....pleeeeeeeease.... oh..20!

  92. Of Course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because thats what all gang members do....play dungeons and dragons...right?!?!?!

  93. Use a Storyteller by gknoy · · Score: 1

    Rather than a "Dungeon Master", which has a leadership connotation that clearly the prisons have a problem with, they should play one of the RPGs with a "Storyteller". Here, the clear role (per the name,and per the RPG design) is to help drive the story, and so on. This way,they can pitch it as a group storytelling session. We nerds know that this is exactly what happens in most D&D games, but using a system whose very role names reinforce this "group storytelling" concept would do that.

    I'm sure they could play star wars, or Fudge, or anything like that. Prison guards will punish them just the same, but this time when they appeal one would hope they would be able to say they were congregating for structured storytelling. There's no mastery envolved, only a referee. This would, of course, depend on rational and informed judges.

  94. The short answer is "No," by westlake · · Score: 1

    Don't these people research or anything?

    The short answer is no.

    Decisions need to be based on evidence that is open and public. Witnesses who can be cross-examined.

    You can't allow the system to be subverted by a judge or juror because of what they think they know after reading an essay in the Wikipedia.

    It's not surprising that a warden might be wary of an RPG. That he might not be willing to invest the time to properly monitor the play. The primal scenario in D&D is that you escape the dungeon, loot the treasure troves and kill whatever - whoever - stands in your way.

  95. I Agree, But Not For the Judge's Reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with the judge's decision to ban D&D on two accounts, but neither are for his reasoning of gang promotion:

    1) It's prison. It's punishment. You're not there to play games.
    2) A group of guys, huddled around maps and figures, discussing various things like escape plans and sharp objects.

    #2 is a recipe for disaster. Not because of gang-like behavior, but because of the ease of planning just about anything within the context of a D&D game -- attacking other inmates, trading/selling illicit substances, or even planning escape.

    1. Re:I Agree, But Not For the Judge's Reasoning by Dogun · · Score: 1

      Honestly, if a prisoner is learning social skills that don't have to do with keestering or smashing your face in, and wants to gain expertise in making friends in the most accepting demographic of our times (pencil and paper RPG players)? I'm okay with that.

      As far as #2... I'd rather someone was toying around with imaginary shivs than real ones. Prisoner's still have first amendment rights, which necessarily includes storytelling.

  96. Three is a mob by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 1

    Yeah, this is nothing like a gang! More like the mob...

    Reminds me more of a panel of judges, where the panel master, err, the chairman instructs the others to... Wait a minute!

  97. Back to being constructive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess prisoners have nothing else to do but go back to raping, stabbing, and doing illicit drugs...

  98. Must have changed since my time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was DM back in the day my players did everything they could to _avoid_ following my directives. Usually with unintended hilarity. Can't imagine that has changed much, but what do I know?

  99. Where have I seen this before??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the ruling: 'during D&D games, one player is denoted the "Dungeon Master." 'The Dungeon Master is tasked with giving directions to other players, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.'"....

    So its not really any different than a classroom, sports field, business or corporation, or church or court room. All you really have to change the name from "Dungeon Master" to "Teacher, Instructor, or Professor", "Referee", "Boss", "CEO", "Minister or Priest, or Rabbi or Imam," "Judge". Given a bit more thought, it could be a military organization with the one in charge a Captain, or General, and you could also add the context of Family with Parent or Guardian in charge. So... the one thing that social workers argue is lacking in people in prisons -structure- is also the one thing the warden is bellyaching about. Or is it that they are finding an outlet for their imaginations, and the warden want -insists- that their time in prison is as destructive and punitive and useless to their rehabilitation as possible.

  100. Brings new meaning.... by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

    .... to the That's How I Roll t-shirt.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    1. Re:Brings new meaning.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or this one...
      http://shirt.woot.com/shirts/how-we-roll

      It's an old Shirt.Woot t-shirt. Wil Wheaton designed it... unfortunately it's no longer for sale.

  101. Cooperative games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The case brought before the Appeals Court argued that D&D inhibited prison security, because "cooperative games can mimic the organization of gangs and lead to the actual development thereof."

    I guess that means they can play adversarial games instead

  102. These arguments are occuring out of order..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obvious point: Games should not be an option in prison, I imagine its hard to play a game when your on a chain gang?

  103. Furthermore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Judges mimic people with actual intelligence ... but not always.

  104. A retort! by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    In retaliation for this ruling, my next D&D campaign will railroad the players into a prison where they have to get the warring factions inside to band together ultimately building to a riot and jailbreak.

  105. Internet pirate by Octopuscabbage · · Score: 1

    Come on, thats stupid. Now what will i do when i go to jail for internet piracy??!?!

  106. Re: Jesus saves, Everyone else takes full damage by RudeIota · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows zombies have poor reflexes

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  107. What's more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The playing of Nethack was determined to encourage the inappropriate use of ASCII characters!

  108. If there are any girls there I want to DO THEM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vChEPj0dXXk

  109. Can't Catch a Break by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, Terry Childs just can't catch a break these days.

  110. Safety first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, sure, you all laugh now. But just wait until we get a /. story about a prison worker being eaten by a grue.

  111. A more persuasive anti-gang argument... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    Don't hate the game, hate the playa....

  112. fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    once again america is found to be run by fools and idiots. no wonder your jails are overflowing.

  113. Then they also need to band organized religion too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm serious, Ban organized religion in Jails as well or group prayers.

  114. Corporate Gangs by whipnet · · Score: 1

    "'The Dungeon Master is tasked with giving directions to other players, which Muraski testified mimics the organization of a gang.'" ...this is also mimics the organization of a corporation too. *

  115. Gang like behaviour? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, because, they don't like to tell it, but what happens in real Bloods gang meetings, is they all get together and try to *Finally* get through the Tomb of Horrors.

  116. Ignorance & fear in the heartland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Several years back (in Tulsa, OK) many of my friends were harassed by local police for running LARP games using White Wolf books in a public square downtown, at night. The DMs were accused of being gang leaders. Sure, 50 or 60 people in all black might look scary from a distance. But when you get close and see they're a bunch of nerds using rock-paper-scissors mechanics and falling to the ground as dramatically as possible for death scenes, that should be the first clue that there are much larger problems to deal with (like maybe real criminals committing actual crimes).

  117. Watch Instinct with Anthony Hopkins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch the movie 'Instinct' with Anthony Hopkins, pay careful attention to the content of the prison scenes.

    It's obvious: if all of the prisoners are focused on each other in some interesting game which threatens no one, they may form a bond, you cannot have that, which is why pot remains illegal because it breaks down barriers. Instead, keep the prisoners divided by many things, gangs being one of them, allow no single way of unification for peace.

    Watch that movie, Instinct, in short time you'll see the real problem with prison and society. Gang banging should be outlawed in prison, all tats removed and useful activities made mandatory, outside of forced good behavior slave labor.

  118. Having actually played D&D in a Federal prison by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    I CAN testify to the fact that tempers get hot when the DM is an butt-hole, or other players are too stupid to handle even simple situations. The problem is especially acute with DMs. DMs in my understanding can be cool or not cool. Given the nature of criminals, DM criminals tend to not be cool. However, during my experiences with D&D in a Federal joint, at least one DM that I knew wasn't that bad. But most of the rest easily tended to be either brutal on their players (within the game that is) or just bizarre.

    I know back in the '90's several Federal prisons banned D&D because of the incidence of shankings that occurred. So the potential for violence in a violent place is definitely real. Several inmates I played D&D with said they didn't mind playing at a FCI (a Federal Correctional Institute, a medium security facility) but wouldn't consider playing at a Penitentiary (a high security facility) due to the risk of playing with more violent offenders.

    But "stimulating gang activity"? That's just ridiculous. You're either in a gang or you're not in the joint. The decision is made by your background on the street, not by some game. By far most prison D&D players in my experience were white urban criminals, many of whom probably weren't gang members on the street, although some undoubtedly were. Whether they would participate in gang activities in the joint would be totally determined by their previous gang membership or their wish to join a prison gang for support reasons. D&D is purely a recreational activity the same as weight lifting or basketball or card playing in the joint. Who you do it with is determined by your social connections in the joint, not the reverse.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  119. Communication and cooperation by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    For goodness' sake!

    Roleplaying games are good practice in (verbal) communication and cooperation.

    Isn't the lack of those skills part of why many of them are in jail?

  120. What cheesed the judges off was this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DungeonMaster: Mugsy, it's your turn.

    Mugsy: "I'm rolling dice for the chance to 'borrow' a shovel from the prison maintenance supply closet when nobody is looking."

    DungeonMaster: "Take these two thirteen-sided dice and roll them. You must get at least 20 to get the shovel. Less than 15 and not only do you fail to get the shovel, but the guards catch you at it, beat you to within an inch of your life, and put you into solitary confinement."

    Mugsy: "Come on, 26; come on, 26" (rolls 21) "Yeah baby, yeah! Now I can start my escape tunnel ..."

    DungeonMaster: "Joe 'The Snake' Armani has just learned of your plans. He says that unless you take him along, he'll squeal to the pigs. But if you do take him along, he'll help you procure a supply of wood beams to reinforce your escape tunnel ..."

  121. D&D is evil?!?! by Koltur · · Score: 1

    Have 'em play Call of Cthulhu instead, heh!

  122. This news and more... by sir1real · · Score: 1

    ...Tonight on 'World's Stupidest Judges.'

  123. What D&D really teaches by metacell · · Score: 1

    To play D&D, you need to learn to:

    * Follow a set of written rules
    * Consider the wishes of your peers
    * Work with your peers towards a common goal

    I.e, roughly the same skills which are important for being a law-abiding citizen and being able to hold a job.

    That being said, I doubt a game in itself makes much difference. Those who already have the above-mentioned skills are more likely to start playing D&D, not the other way around.

  124. Except that they are wrong by mark-t · · Score: 1

    A dungeon master does *NOT* typically give the players any direction whatsoever... the players usually have to figure things out for themselves. To liken a dungeon master to a gang leader would be like a gang leader who deliberately creates obstacles for the gang to overcome.

  125. rollin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe the court just rolled 1d8 to ban, and it wasn't those convicts' lucky day.

  126. "Giving directions to players"? by Millennium · · Score: 1

    If the DM was giving out orders, then it sounds like he was a really bad DM. Either that, or there really was a gang that tried (poorly) to mask its operations as a D&D session.

    Brings new meaning to the term "railroading," I guess.

  127. more like a yeshivah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My memories of playing suggest that its more like a religious school, where various students test theories about the world, with the school's head scholar expounding on the nature of reality. one can challenge the head scholar based on your acquisition of knowledge of the world he has secret knowledge of. if your challenge is based on logic consistent with the head scholars understanding of the world, he may include your challenge in his revised worldview and grant you life or treasure if appropriate. I think i learned a lot about how to discern internal consistency in a system, and eventually graduated to studying the real world with the skills i learned in d&d. but then, maybe i played with people a little far out on the bell curve...

  128. subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    DM: "You see a hoopty rolling up on you. The tinted window is coming down slowly."
    Player: "I jump into the bushes and grab my strap."
    DM: "Roll for initiative."

  129. I find the new favicon irritating by roguegramma · · Score: 1

    I find the new favicon irritating, because the corners are white not transparent.

    I use firefox with an infographics of the solar system as the personas settings, and the white corners show on black background.

    --
    Hey don't blame me, IANAB