Slashdot Mirror


Is Your Electricity Meter Spying On You?

lee1 writes "If you have a 'smart meter,' it is collecting data that can reveal when you wake up, when you leave for work and come home, when you go on vacation and when you take a shower. This data is commercially valuable and, if sold to third parties, can lead to privacy invasion on a massive scale. The California Public Utility Commission is reacting to the gas and electric company's mass installation of these meters with new proposals for strong privacy protections."

405 comments

  1. But.... by Haffner · · Score: 5, Funny

    These are what keep us SAFE because it lets power companies notify law enforcement when our neighbors are growing marijuana! We NEED these to keep us SAFE!

    --
    "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    1. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your smart meter data shows you were in the shower at 09:30 this morning and not stuck in traffic! Don't bother coming into work tomorrow Haffner - you're fired!

    2. Re:But.... by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Funny. I thought they were there so they could rape people in the face with excessively high power costs. Which are the result of massive conservation efforts.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:But.... by whovian · · Score: 3, Funny

      One man's 600 W marijuana farm is another man's compute cluster.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    4. Re:But.... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Obviously that compute cluster is used for child porn. QUICK OFF WITH HIS HEAD!

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:But.... by Haffner · · Score: 2

      Clearly, all customers who consume electricity more than one standard deviation above the norm should be eligible for a warrantless search of their house.

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
    6. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One man's 600 W marijuana farm is another man's compute cluster.

      That's a pretty crappy marijuana farm if it's only 600W.

    7. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You say that jokingly, and yet, that is the SOLE piece of evidence that has been used at least three times in my county alone (three that I personally know of, probably has been more) to justify breaking down someone's door at 3AM on a drug raid. Granted, one time out of those three the person actually WAS growing pot, but the other two times? And no, the people were not compensated in any way, including for the damage to their property and possessions.

    8. Re:But.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How did they get that evidence without a court order?
      Getting the court order for the data from the electric company should require some other evidence right?

    9. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One man's 600 W marijuana farm is another man's Bitcoin Mining Rig.

      Fixed that for you :-)

    10. Re:But.... by kqs · · Score: 2

      Without conservation efforts, power costs wouldn't be excessively high? That seems optimistic.

    11. Re:But.... by localman57 · · Score: 1

      The electric company might just give the data to the cops without ever being asked. Power companies typically like average customers, not peak customers (although they do like customers who use lots of power at off-peak times). If someone hands the cops something, they don't need a warrant. The only question then is if the people with their doors busted in have any recourse against the power company.

    12. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      LEDs my friend, LEDs ;)

    13. Re:But.... by DrKnark · · Score: 1

      Well, that wouldn't be enough. They probably couldn't filter out someone with just a couple of plants anyway. But if you have say 3kW of growing lamps going on and off at the same second every day then maybe, if added to other suspicious activity it could warrant some form of action. I've been told that this is one way police look for marijuana farms here in sweden.. whether there's any truth to that I do not know.

    14. Re:But.... by Rossman · · Score: 1

      It's not in the power company's interest to rat out people with grow-ops.
      Assuming the people are paying their bills in a timely manner, they are a good profit centre for the power company.

    15. Re:But.... by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Warrantless? Of course there will be a warrant...

    16. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true! During the recent drought, people conserved so much water that the DWP had to raise rates to cover operating expenses!

    17. Re:But.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      That seems backwards. During a drought they should just increase the price of water, until usage goes down as much as they need.

    18. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not uncommon for true grow houses to have had former electric company employees alter the wiring for the neighborhood and house so they don't get charged for so much electricity and don't draw attention. Perhaps the smart meters are harder to bypass.

      I don't grow marijuana, I just listen to Stuff You Should Know.

    19. Re:But.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Why would you not run your farm in two or more sets so you can use the same amount of power all the time?

    20. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the best spectrum for growing.

      But 600W is enough for a reasonably sized personal use garden, though certainly well short of a commercial enterprise

    21. Re:But.... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      A lot of the annual operating budget of a utility does not scale with the volume they sell. Employees form a huge part of that. So does ordinary maintenance of infrastructure and equipment.

      The cost of actually producing the water is actually relatively low, and the utility won't break even if they don't sell at least a certain amount of water in a year. So if people cut back and conserve, the annual cost of operating per gallon of water actually produced and sold goes way up.

    22. Re:But.... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      If so little water is being sold that the revenue does not cover the cost of maintaining the water works system, then you've got to increase sales price or increase sales volume to cover operating costs. Other options could be let it break down and close the city water works, or increase taxes to cover the operating costs not being covered by water sales.

      Doesn't really seem that confusing to me.

    23. Re:But.... by HungryHobo · · Score: 2

      Girlfriend works for an electricity supply company: apparently a good tactic to improve your profit margin- people rent somewhere, use an arseload of power to run their grow house and then disappear without ever paying their bill.

    24. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the IP address to his broadband modem also identify him as a dirty PIRATE?!?!

    25. Re:But.... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2

      Well, that wouldn't be enough. They probably couldn't filter out someone with just a couple of plants anyway. But if you have say 3kW of growing lamps going on and off at the same second every day then maybe, if added to other suspicious activity it could warrant some form of action.

      I've been told that this is one way police look for marijuana farms here in sweden.. whether there's any truth to that I do not know.

      Hence the problem. I have 3kW of 2 tons worth of servers and UPS, and rack and misc equipment always running in a garage-converted-to-office. There's a very decent (ie: noticeably large) variance, at roughly the same times every day, caused by the AC cycling from fan to cool. And my only drug is Iron Maiden, which AFAIK, isn't illegal in this state.

      Being a night person (and programmer/designer), I am in and out at odd hours of the night. I've got customers who come in during the afternoons and evenings to drop off computer repairs - which creates certain appearances for the casual observer, since they run in, drop off a machine, give us some info and run out (with similar appearances for pickups).

      So, the only thing they will be noting is (a) I repair computers from a legitimate business, (b) I run the Star Trek Phase 2 websites and production servers (and a few other sites) and (c) I like programming late evening into the night, when it's quieter (less interruptions, AC cycling from fan to cool a lot less).

      I am sure I am not the only one with similar "incriminating" scenarios (at least a few of my friends fit under similar scenarios).

      Such actions without additional solid basis, are simply fishing expeditions.

    26. Re:But.... by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      I don't see how this would have any effect on the "identification" of a dope farm. If you're using a lot of electricity (more than the norm) then they already know it since they're billing you for the juice. If they know the time of day that you're using the juice, how does that help nail down whether or not you're a grower?

      The only thing I can immediately think of this being useful for is to develop a profile of times when you are not home for potential burglary.

    27. Re:But.... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      I have a 20kW electric furnace.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    28. Re:But.... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was trying to figure out how to use the waste energy from the computer cluster to power the grow lights in my basement - any ideas?

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    29. Re:But.... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      No the Electric company looks for unbalanced loads and determines if there is a problem. The people who got raided may not of been using drugs but I would be willing to bet they were stealing electricity.

      People who grow pot in their house tend not to be overly intelligent individuals. They run one circuit from the panel to power the lights. This causes a load imbalance that is noticeable from the transformer. An hour worth of checking off all home meters off of said transformer finds the guilty party.

      It is also how many people steal electricity. They only bridge one 120 volt line figuring it will be less noticeable than doing both. However it actually makes it more noticeable to those who maintain the lines.

      Ultimately if your going to steal electricity in the USA for whatever reason, or grow illegal drugs, make sure you use only 240volt equipment. It shows up less on random power company line checks.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    30. Re:But.... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Technically if he just showered, he'd be a clean pirate, no?

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    31. Re:But.... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      No... pirates never clean behind their ears.

    32. Re:But.... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Those who are growing dope in their homes are the same kind of person who sticks it to the man by not paying bills.

      It is funny on how many drug dealers are not caught by Narcotic officers but for speeding, running lights, not paying bills, and other mudane stuff.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    33. Re:But.... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      You would think that with the profits from a successful grow op, someone would be able to invest in solar panels, a wind turbine, or even just a battery pack that gets charged slowly during the day and kicks in during peak power to prevent the electric company from ever seeing a "spike". This would be a much wiser investment than, say, bling bling.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    34. Re:But.... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      It's a pretty crappy computer, too.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    35. Re:But.... by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 1

      It seems the prevailing Slashdot philosophy on criminal behavior is "innocent unless you're rich."

    36. Re:But.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Then it should not be billed by the unit. They should have a cost of service fee and a very low per unit cost.

    37. Re:But.... by Moryath · · Score: 1

      But that would make sense!

    38. Re:But.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Why not just pay for the power?
      Run the lights in such a way that you are drawing the same constant load and don't get too greedy by shoving more plants into a house than can be hid in the basement. It seems if you did that it would be likely no one would notice.

    39. Re:But.... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Yes because a drug dealer would never think about stealing power from you, so when SWAT comes they are breaking down your door.

    40. Re:But.... by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0

      That seems backwards.

      No, it's California, where every day is Opposite Day.

    41. Re:But.... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      No. Because more power usage means that there's more generation being created. There is an upper curve, yes. But, in places like Ontario where we already have these meters, and businesses have fled, and people have cut back usage? The OPG applied for and got an increase in order to off-set conversation. Smart meters only cost you more money.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    42. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... pirates never clean behind their ears.

      I'm pretty sure I don't want to know how you got into a position to pick up that little chunk of knowledge.

    43. Re:But.... by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      If they are good looking they must sue the police department, if they aren't I am sorry for them

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    44. Re:But.... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      They DO... but the cost of service fee isn't really large enough to cover the cost of service. They plan to make up the difference by actually, ya know, selling water.

    45. Re:But.... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That seems backwards. During a drought they should just increase the price of water, until usage goes down as much as they need.

      Leaving ordinary people unable to afford to flush their toilets, and rich people with lush, green lawns.

      The market doesn't solve problems like this very well, contrary to what people seem to believe.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    46. Re:But.... by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      Or, just move to one of the places in California that won't bother you about it. Back when I still did that, I got sick of paying for it and got a book about how to grow the "right" way. One of their suggestions for the drawing so much power problem was to get something that could set outside and would draw a lot of power...electric kiln, Tesla coil, etc. They were very adamant about not stealing the power though.

      Ofc, none of that will help you if they flyover your house with an IR camera. Not to go all tinfoil hat, but I watched a black helicopter obviously flying a pattern to cover the whole area a while back. I don't live in the best of neighborhoods (it certainly isn't the ghetto, but there is a LOT of top tier vwhite trash....they found a mobile meth lab in the dumpster of the local mini-mart a few months ago) added to that, it's in the main flight path to the local airport...the planes are on approach by the time they are over us, you NEVER see heli's flying around there.

    47. Re:But.... by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      You know...I live in a duplex and noticed that there is a 120 running from my circuit box to the apt on the other side. I better check that shit out.

      I know the people very well, they have 2 older children and 2 newborn twins, I've been in their side many many times....but you can never be too sure.

    48. Re:But.... by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Funny

      Leaving ordinary people unable to afford to flush their toilets, and rich people with lush, green lawns.

      The market doesn't solve problems like this very well, contrary to what people seem to believe.

      The solution is to have ordinary people deficate/urinate on rich peoples' lawns.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    49. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. Just pay your huge-ass electric bill, and you will have absolutely no trouble, from the utility.

    50. Re:But.... by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 1

      I pay over $60/month just to have a water hookup. The amount I pay for the water itself is a fraction of what I pay for the connection. If they can't break even with every property in the community paying that much every month just for the infrastructure, something's screwed up.

    51. Re:But.... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, in the courts it seems to be the other way 'round.

      "Guilty unless you're rich"

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    52. Re:But.... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      It depends on the size of the utility, how much infrastructure they have to maintain, and how old it is.

      It costs a lot of money to dig up a split water main and repair it, especially since they're often underneath roads (that's where the right of way is often located) and might undermine and destroy a significant amount of pavement that will have to be replaced after the water main has been repaired.

      IIRC there were a couple of large main breaks in my city that cost a quarter million dollars each because they were mains that blew right under large intersections. Expenses like that will eat through quite a few $60/mo. service charges pretty quickly.

    53. Re:But.... by chuckugly · · Score: 1

      The OPG applied for and got an increase in order to off-set conversation. Smart meters only cost you more money.

      Anything that cuts down on excess conversation is OK for me.

    54. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pray tell, how is your electricity meter, which measures whole-house power, going to identify when one takes a shower?

    55. Re:But.... by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Yarrr! Thar be coins in them thar data clusters!

    56. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      operating in regular 12 hours intervals

    57. Re:But.... by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      The really cool trick is to put a coil against the wall near the electric meter. You use the electric companies power to create a magnetic field that slows down the meter. If you make the field too strong you would even start moving it backwards, so you have to make sure the number of loops is enough to have an effect, but not too much that it would be noticed for having too large of an effect.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    58. Re:But.... by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      Ok that's just funny.

    59. Re:But.... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Which I would think someone growing a product that costs as much as that would have no problem paying.

    60. Re:But.... by greylion3 · · Score: 1

      If the power factor or phi is being recorded too, any number of light bulbs have phi=0 (no phase angle between voltage and current) and power factor = cos(phi) = 1, while a compute cluster with switch-mode PSU's would be a somewhat inductive load, with cos(phi) typically around 0.9-0.99 with PFC, and 0.7-0.8 without PFC.
      By comparing the load and phi before and after something switches on or off, you can make a fairly good guess as to what it is.

      "So, that person has a PSU without PFC = an old PC, then he/she might need a new PC soon. Let's target him/her with PC ads."
      or
      "That might be a marijuana farm - let's make sure they see some ads for drug paraphernalia (bongs), special light bulbs, and indoor gardening supplies (automatic watering)."

      --
      Privacy begins with ..
    61. Re:But.... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      And pray tell, how is your electricity meter, which measures whole-house power, going to identify when one takes a shower?

      Water heater.

    62. Re:But.... by Ichijo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      During a drought they should just increase the price of water, until usage goes down as much as they need.

      Leaving ordinary people unable to afford to flush their toilets, and rich people with lush, green lawns.

      If ordinary people can't afford to flush their toilets for every number one, they'll be a little more selective when they flush, or they'll buy water-conserving toilets, or they'll save their bath and laundry water to fill the toilet, or they'll move to a place where water is more abundant. All of these are good things for sustainable living.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    63. Re:But.... by illtud · · Score: 1

      One man's 600 W marijuana farm is another man's compute cluster.

      Are you missing a 'k' there? 600W isn't a farm, it's a closet! We've had lots of domestic farm (mainly forced vietnamese labour) busts here in Wales and 6kW is more like it, just in tiny houses.

    64. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That seems backwards. During a drought they should just increase the price of water, until usage goes down as much as they need.

      Leaving ordinary people unable to afford to flush their toilets, and rich people with lush, green lawns.

      The market doesn't solve problems like this very well, contrary to what people seem to believe.

      There are market incentives that can be used in such a case, though, such as:
      1-1000 gallons @ $0.001/gal
      1001-5000 gallons @ $0.005/gal
      5001+ gallons @ $0.020/gal
      (numbers pulled wildly out of the air, but the concept is flexible)

      Don't confuse our market with the concepts of markets in general. Incentives can be much more flexible than we currently see them being used.

    65. Re:But.... by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Holy! Not only my bath pipes are waiting at home broken, I was stuck in traffic but now I'm fired and not going to be able to pay for a plumber and the water bill?

      Assumptions, assumptions, assumptions.... they're always easy to make.

    66. Re:But.... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The solution: socialism! It's amazing how many times it can be repeatedly proven that the market doesn't work, and yet socialism still hasn't taken hold. Those damn rich capitalist countries, creating wealth from nothing!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    67. Re:But.... by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      Also with smart metering you can have multiple tarriffs going on the one meter so you could have one for hot water and one for lights and power.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    68. Re:But.... by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Anything that cuts down on excess conversation is OK for me.

      You must be new here...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    69. Re:But.... by Khyber · · Score: 1

      This person gets rated funny but the reality is 600w LED will stomp the dirt out of a 600w HPS/MH.

      The future of any crop production is LED. I'm already on the path to ensuring that. Soon my new diode type will be out, and no more bothering with ratios for production. Just load up on diodes and roll, with 3x better efficiency versus HID.

      The future is coming, and I have been a part of shaping it. Be prepared for some new stuff involving microplasma lighting, as well!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    70. Re:But.... by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      Not in australia all our meters will save you money, you get options for better tariffs (rate plans, putting some equipment on off peak power, ect) and we can show you where to save power. Not to mention its a lot more accurate, and if your power ussage is jumping up and down it shows less than an electromechanical because there is no momentum of the disc.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    71. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      depends what country, in australia you don't need a warrent they raid the house and if they find any evidence on you they use that.

    72. Re:But.... by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      And no, the people were not compensated in any way, including for the damage to their property and possessions.

      Did they sue? You realize that most people would not sue to recover such damages and in the US the only way you are going to be compensated at all is to sue. Now, it is unlikley it would come to trial because the city/county/whatever would settle but the gateway is to file a lawsuit.

      Failing to sue means that it wasn't that big a deal.

    73. Re:But.... by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      Quick send in the fbi swat team they are using an extra kwh than they should. Most of the pot growers we catch over here steal thier electrcity, stupidy though they steal all thier power (zero bill on an occupied property) or don't pay the bill on the electrcity they don't steal; then when we disconect them and can still hear the air con going and its police time.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    74. Re:But.... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize that! Narrows it down quite nicely, taking what little guesswork there is out of it.

    75. Re:But.... by treeves · · Score: 1

      And the water heater knows whether it is supplying a shower, or the dishwasher (which has a time delay on mine at least), or the clothes washer, and then it tells the smart meter? Dang appliances talking to each other. Shut 'em up!

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    76. Re:But.... by treeves · · Score: 1

      This is already done, albeit not to the degree you suggest.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    77. Re:But.... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't, but the amount of energy it uses to warm up the fresh cold water is going to be a different but fairly consistent number for every appliance. And the more random amounts will be human-related uses, the largest of which will likely be a shower.

      Of course, you could put the shower on a time delay! That'd show them!

    78. Re:But.... by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1

      leaving out the fact that most water heaters are gas-powered, how are you going to break out the water heater usage from the jumbled mess that is the household usage? even if you manage that, how do you know who's taking a shower if there's more than one person in a home?

    79. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, what? Unless they're individually monitoring the water heater, how are they specifically going to apply a different tariff with just one meter? With SE2.0 (and even 1.0), there are different tariff levels, either having to do with time of day or as announced by the Utility when they're forecasting heavy usage. But there's nothing in the specs that target individual pieces of equipment with special rates. Currently, there are programs that run breakers to the AC unit and cut off power when there's a peak event to shed load, but they actually GIVE you credit for doing that, not charging you a different rate.

    80. Re:But.... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      A short snippet of electricity usage may be hard to tell, but keep in mind that the smart meter is monitoring the house 24/7, so it has plenty of time to gather trends. Say for example the electricity usage suddenly spikes around 6:30 am every M-F probably indicates that someone is taking a shower before they go to work at their 8-5 job, and so forth. Though that still assumes an electric water - mine is gas and isn't even hooked to the mains.

    81. Re:But.... by plover · · Score: 1

      No... pirates never clean behind their ears.

      I'm pretty sure I don't want to know how you got into a position to pick up that little chunk of knowledge.

      He paid $2.00 for the knowledge. That comes out to a buck-an-ear.

      <ducks/>

      --
      John
    82. Re:But.... by plover · · Score: 1

      leaving out the fact that most water heaters are gas-powered, how are you going to break out the water heater usage from the jumbled mess that is the household usage? even if you manage that, how do you know who's taking a shower if there's more than one person in a home?

      In the warmer parts of the country, it's common to not have gas at all, or bottled LP gas for cooking only. The rest of the appliances are electric. Only here in the frozen north is it common to have natural gas pipes directly to homes, where gas furnaces are the norm.

      And to answer your question, it's a simple matter of traffic analysis. Plot out an example home's electricity usage over time, and you'll see exactly why it's important.
      Midnight - 6:30 AM. Usage is night lights, clocks, cell phone chargers. Possibly a fan. Air conditioning kicks in once in a while. Low current draw with periodic A/C spikes.
      6:30 Alarm awakens user, user arises and turns on bedroom and bathroom lights. The draw would go up by perhaps 0.1kWh from the overnight electric usage, stepping up over a minute or two.
      6:45 User begins to shower. Large current drain of 2kWh for 30 minutes or so as the tank recovers.
      7:00 User turns on TV and cooks breakfast. Slight increase from 2kWh to 2.2kWh from TV and kitchen lights, then another large current drain to 3.2kWh as stove or microwave overlaps water heater tank, then steps down after a few minutes once the food is cooked.
      7:15 Tank recovered, drain down to a fairly low level
      7:30 User shuts off TV, lights. Drain down to a very low level (parasitic drain from wall warts, clocks, etc.)
      7:31 User opens garage door, leaves, closes garage door. Four minutes later, garage door opener light goes out.
      7:35 - 17:00 House remains at consistently low level.

      After watching this pattern Monday through Friday, week after week, you'll understand why it's not really a "jumbled mess" at all. With any external observation, it would be possible to see when various family members awaken, get ready, and leave. And for the "most interested observer", there's more activity:

      7:36 Third party monitoring analysis reveals characteristic double spike of garage door opener and four minute timeout of light.
      7:45 Van pulls up and burglars begin their day.

      --
      John
    83. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some computer control of appliances might allow you to have some things run at night, when electricity is cheaper, which might help. For instance if you were using electric hot water, and are leaving the day, then there is no need to really heat it again till the next evening. Appliances are harder to mask, without significant effort/batteries/etc, although natural gas ones so far don't have such usage details. [With natural gas you could also store some quantity of it, but then you have safety concerns and the need to slightly compress it to store any decent quantity.]

      Another idea, might be to heat water to say 200F at night, then have some super safe water mixer mix it down to normal hot water during the day as needed. (If natural gas is available, it is usually better just to heat with it though, which would make the idea pointless).

      A final idea might be to have large storage containers of liquid refrigerant, and very large containers to store refrigerant as a gas underground. That way, at night your air conditioner compressor could fill the reservoir while it is cheaper to do, and cooler. During the day, when air conditioning is needed you would simply let liquid refrigerant flow through the TXV inside and cool the air. Afterwards it would have to be stored in a the large volume refrigerant gas storage tank. (I've not done the math on this, so it may be wildly infeasible..) Someday we may have ideal batteries. That combined with some solar could easily shift most usage to night time hours.

      Of course, a more cynical/realistic point of view says we pretty much gave up our right for at least everyone not to be able to find us at a moments notice when we started carrying cell phones around....

    84. Re:But.... by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1

      Theoretically, you might be able to break out the water heater... if these events were isolated, with a clean start and finish. But in reality, it'll look something like this:

      http://benjaminellis.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/power-day.png

      Those 2kw spikes could be anything number of things: electric kettle, AC/(electric)heat, electric stove, anything with a large current draw or sometimes even a combination of smaller devices turning on at once. It gets even worse when it's more than one person in a house.

      I worked with a company trying to solve exactly this problem - breaking out device usage from the whole house power, and the results were not very encouraging. The only sure thing the software could identify was that... someone was home and maybe the AC/Heater cycling. The eventual solution basically was to place a CT around every branch in the circuit break box

    85. Re:But.... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      *Groan*

      You'd better duck too after that...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    86. Re:But.... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Only if they are all HAN devices. Then they really can talk to each other.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    87. Re:But.... by FragHARD · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you call a cluster but I use around 4000 watts on my cluster...

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    88. Re:But.... by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      Yup we have a number of channels on some of our meters. The ones we are rolling out to some customers now have 3 one for general constant supply, one for off-peak (which is switched off at some points in the day and is where you would have your hot water connected (you can have whatever you want plugged into the off peak tariff but it has to be hardwired over here, and it wont work in peak times (We send an audio frequency down the line to switch the off peak on and off)) and one for solar. It makes more sense than putting in a multiple meters. These aren’t using a zigbee network at the moment, but they could be. With our meters you can simultaneously use power on multiple tariffs with one meter. Just like you can measure 3 phases independently with a 3 phase meter.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    89. Re:But.... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Leaving ordinary people unable to afford to flush their toilets, and rich people with lush, green lawns.

      Only if the implementation isn't that smart. They can scale cost by individual usage. In other words... your price per gallon of water increases with the number gallons YOUR property uses from the water service.

      Should be: $0.02/gallon for the first 20 gallons used a day.

      $0.03/gallon for the next 15 gallons used that day.

      $0.04/gallon for the next 10 gallons used that day

      $0.08/gallon + $0.01*(TotalGallons - 45)^2 + $0.02*(MAX(0,TotalGallons - 60))^2 + $0.04*(MAX(0,TotalGallons-80)) for the next 100 gallons used that day.

      Example bills 1 month (30 days):

      20 gallons used every day: $0.02 * 20 * 30 = $12/month.

      35 gallons used every day: $0.02 * 20 * 30 + $0.03 * 15 * 30 = $25.50/month

      45 gallons used every day: $0.02 * 20 * 30 + $0.03 * 15 * 30 + $0.04 * 10 * 30 = $37.50/month

      50 gallons used every day: $37.50 + ( $0.08 * (50-45) * 30 + $0.01*(50 - 45)^2 + $0.02*0 ) = $49.75/month

      60 gallons used every day: $37.50 + ( $0.08 * (60-45) * 30 + $0.01*(60 - 45)^2 + $0.02*0 ) = $75.75/month

      70 gallons used every day: $37.50 + ( $0.08 * (70-45) * 30 + $0.01*(70 - 45)^2 + $0.02*(70-60)^2 ) = $105.75/month

      80 gallons used every day: $141.75/month

      90 gallons used every day: $187.75/month

      100 gallons used every day: $247.75/month

      140 gallons used every day: $627.75/month

      180 gallons used every day: $1,231.75/month

      220 gallons used every day: $2,059.75/month

      240 gallons used every day: $2,557.75/month

      260 gallons used every day: $3,111.75/month

      300 gallons used every day: $4,387.75/month

      400 gallons used every day: $8,557.75/month

    90. Re:But.... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      No the Electric company looks for unbalanced loads and determines if there is a problem. The people who got raided may not of been using drugs but I would be willing to bet they were stealing electricity.

      Or having electricity stolen from them. I work for an electricity distributor, and from talking to people involved in the investigations team, the most common situation with grow houses is they steal power form their neighbours. So having an excessively high power bill can be a sign that someone near them is growing pot.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    91. Re:But.... by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Which is why any utility with a clue requires a deposit if they don't know you. Further, with SmartMeters they can detect this sort of abuse and turn it off without a truck roll.

    92. Re:But.... by smellotron · · Score: 1

      Power companies typically like average customers, not peak customers (although they do like customers who use lots of power at off-peak times)

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this is only true if you are charged a flat (amortized) rate for electricity. If you are using a "smart" meter that charges you based on the market rate at any point in time, the the power company shouldn't give a rat's ass that you are a peak customer, because you are paying for it.

    93. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is clear you never have grown marijuana. Marijuana growers bypass their electricity meters. The only right way to grow illegal marijuana is by using illegal electricity.

      Nyh

    94. Re:But.... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Most marijuana farms round here (which need to be indoors, it doesn't grow well out of doors here) just short-circuit the meter. It's not as if they're going to be around for long after all.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    95. Re:But.... by plover · · Score: 1

      The only sure thing the software could identify was that... someone was home and maybe the AC/Heater cycling. The eventual solution basically was to place a CT around every branch in the circuit break box

      And that's the difference between traffic analysis and decryption. Traffic analysis is often all the info you need, depending on your goals. If I identify what looks to be your "leave home" profile and map that to your timecard punch in the mornings, perhaps I could guess that your commute is about an hour. If I chat you up over lunch, and get you to tell me your commute is indeed about an hour, then I've got pretty good confirmation.

      For this purpose, I don't need to know exactly "water heater", "stove", "TV set", which would be the equivalent of decryption. I just need to know the difference between "occupied" and "unoccupied", which is traffic analysis.

      So if your meter profiles indicate you've been leaving the house later, but your timecard punches are still spot-on every morning, maybe I should monitor the time clock to see if you're faking your timecard data.

      --
      John
    96. Re:But.... by treeves · · Score: 1

      My clothes washer and my dishwasher both have several different cycles all of which use different amounts of hot water. I think it would be wrong to try to figure out what time I take showers from my energy usage. Oh, and my water heater uses natural gas, not electricity. So it doesn't matter.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    97. Re:But.... by idlehanz · · Score: 1

      That is correct. The utility is looking for people to participate in time of use pricing to encourage a move to off-peak charging. They don't care about an individual consumer, they care about the aggregate demand that can be planned on. They want base load generation to be used and to avoid paying for peak load generation which is more costly. They don't care about John at 123 Elm Street, even if he is growing pot, as long as he pays his bill.

      --
      Changing the world... one research project at a time.
    98. Re:But.... by idlehanz · · Score: 1

      Put a fan above the cluster that turns from the inducted heat. Spinning magnets over coiled wire, voila, electricity. Attach grow light and you're rocking.

      --
      Changing the world... one research project at a time.
    99. Re:But.... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Then it should not be billed by the unit. They should have a cost of service fee and a very low per unit cost.

      But that won't discourage over use. There is a cap on the size of the resource as well as the capacity of the system. Exceed that cap and there's a shortage. Or the utility must raise expensive capital to upgrade facilities to meet peak demands.

      The solution would be a service fee for up to some quantity of use per day/week/month plus a surcharge for exceeding that cap. Pretty much like Internet bandwidth.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    100. Re:But.... by PPH · · Score: 1

      This is one reason my boss never had my home address. Just the PO Box.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  2. yea and my toaster by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    is signalling the CIA

    1. Re:yea and my toaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It happens I have been working with people connected to the intelligence community and I confirm they indeed make use of electricity and water consumption data.

    2. Re:yea and my toaster by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      is signalling the CIA

      We told you not to go and load Debian on it, but would you listen? No, of course not.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:yea and my toaster by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      Try wrapping the bread in tin foil.

    4. Re:yea and my toaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We told you not to go and load Debian on it, but would you listen? No, of course not.

      Toasters run FreeBSD.

    5. Re:yea and my toaster by immaterial · · Score: 1

      This who brouhaha over smart meters seems absurd to me.

      This is the power company wanting to know how much power you're taking form them, and at what time; getting angry about this is like getting angry that the local grocery store knows what time you come in every week to buy 5 bags of Doritos and a 24-pack of Mountain Dew (WalMart already knows when your have sex, when your period is, etc.). It's a transaction between two parties, there's no expectation that one of the parties not know when and how much he's selling his product!

      Now, while I think it's perfectly legitimate for a business to track its sales, I do think the information encoded in those transactions should not go beyond the parties initially involved; junk mail advertisers have no business knowing your interactions with Wal-Mart since they were not part of the transaction. What we need are strong laws preventing the sale of customer information to third parties.

    6. Re:yea and my toaster by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      can the cia train squirrels? i have one trying to claw its way into my house. i need to know if it is getting paid by the cia or the electric company. sssshh. here he comes.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    7. Re:yea and my toaster by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they wouldn't have had that problem if they were running NetBSD on that toaster.

      http://www.embeddedarm.com/software/arm-netbsd-toaster.php

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    8. Re:yea and my toaster by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      slackware, get it right

  3. Privacy by Renraku · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People need to realize that any device that can collect and transmit data will probably be used to collect more data than they should. That data will PROBABLY end up being sold, simply because people are willing to pay for it. Since it is our data, why can't we demand a cut of the profits?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Privacy by einstein4pres · · Score: 1

      Since it is our data, why can't we demand a cut of the profits?

      Well, in theory, selling that data should allow your electricity provider to provide service for less money, but that's not a given by any means.

      Also, while the data is about you, the data was collected by another party. (at the risk of bad analogy) If you participated in a study, you wouldn't expect to own the results, or even the data collected on yourself.

    2. Re:Privacy by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No, in theory they would just keep that as profit. Electricity is sold at whatever price the market will pay.

    3. Re:Privacy by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Well, in theory, selling that data should allow your electricity provider to provide service for less money, but that's not a given by any means.

      I always thought this would be the case with branded clothing, the shirts that have the manufacturer's logo emblazoned in bright letters across the sleeve, back, and/or chest. You're basically a walking billboard. But generally they are more expensive than unbranded clothes. So this led me to believe that perhaps the branded clothes are of a significantly higher quality than unbranded clothes and, without the logo, might actually be even twice what we pay for them.

      But then I thought that we're probably just getting ripped off.

    4. Re:Privacy by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Could you repeat that?

      signed,

      the NSAA.

    5. Re:Privacy by softWare3ngineer · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Because its not your data...
      Just as you don't own your music, copy of MS software, facebook data, instant messages, and most things you put on the Internet.

    6. Re:Privacy by blair1q · · Score: 1

      You are paying for the envy of those among your friends who do not have the cool brand of clothes.

      Same deal with "luxury automobiles."

    7. Re:Privacy by localman57 · · Score: 1

      That varies by state. In Indiana the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission must approve rate hikes. Although they've recently been plauged with the typicaly "You went to work for the company you regulated and made a gazillion dollars, right after making a favorable decision for said utility." scandal.

    8. Re:Privacy by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      NSAA??

      http://www.google.com/search?aq=f&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=nsaa

      the Nebraska School Activities Association?

      Or did you mean the National Student Association? www.nsa.gov

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    9. Re:Privacy by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I mean DELL KEYBOARDS FUCKING SUCK!

      aldjkfhaldkfhalkdfhakhfalkfhadjfhalkdfhldkfjhalkdhfakldfhalkdjfh akldjfhakldfhaklhfalkjf <-- filter that, /.

    10. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consumers are not the client but the merchandise.

    11. Re:Privacy by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Membrane keyboards suck. But yes, I did know what you meant :)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    12. Re:Privacy by DriedClexler · · Score: 0

      Since it is our data, why can't we demand a cut of the profits?

      Probably because then you'd have to reconcile that ownership claim with the dismissive attitude you might have toward intellectual property -- sorry, "imaginary property", "shouldn't-exist property", whatever.

      And no one wants to have to think through that shit.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    13. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, they'll give you $1 off your bill.

      Don't be alarmed when inflation causes their rates to go up $1.50 in 6 months though.

    14. Re:Privacy by AB3A · · Score: 1

      The solution is obvious: install your own power sources and you can walk away from the grid without telling anyone anything. Use solar power, with a diesel or natural gas generator as backup.

      Of course this may result in more greenhouse gasses than we are making right now --but that's the law of unintended consequences.

      --
      Nearly fifty percent of all graduates come from the bottom half of the class!
    15. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, first stolen, then sold

    16. Re:Privacy by rssrss · · Score: 1

      I tried to warn slashdotters about smart meters, a year ago, and my comment got modded troll.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    17. Re:Privacy by trancemission · · Score: 0

      You are the profit....

    18. Re:Privacy by rich3rd · · Score: 1

      Membrane keyboards suck. But yes, I did know what you meant :)

      Typing this on an Apple Extended Keyboard II plugged into an iMate USB To ADB Adaptor. Best. Keyboard. Ever.

    19. Re:Privacy by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      Electricity is sold at whatever price the market will pay.

      In the USA, power companies must get permission for rate increases from the government. They're a public utility.

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    20. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People need to realize that any device that can collect and transmit data will probably be used to collect more data than they should. That data will PROBABLY end up being sold, simply because people are willing to pay for it. Since it is our data, why can't we demand a cut of the profits?

      Since it is our data, why can't we DEMAND ALL OF THE PROFITS?

      There, fixed that for you.

    21. Re:Privacy by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      How do you know when your friend has bought an iPhone?
      He'll tell you.

      Same with all Apple gear, it seems.

      Don't take this as a troll; I just wish I had enough money to buy Apple gear.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    22. Re:Privacy by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, capitalism prevails! Simply switch to a power company that doesn't track your data.

    23. Re:Privacy by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      The best clothes I own are made by a tailor, and contain no visible logos at all. If you know much about clothes, you can easily distinguish quality from cheap crap.

      And luxury cars really are a lot more comfortable than non-luxury. You can always debadge, if you like.

    24. Re:Privacy by quickgold192 · · Score: 1

      Well in this case, you're not making "your" data available - the power companies are, hypothetically.

      However, that data doesn't belong to you any more than conductivity data belongs to a chunk of Tungsten or airspeed data belongs to a falcon - the data belongs to the observer. The proposals focus on what rules the observers must follow to be given the privilege of observing. If you want to "own" your own data, you have to make sure that no one other than yourself observes you.

    25. Re:Privacy by rich3rd · · Score: 1

      The Extended Keyboard II is actually an ancient barge of a keyboard; beige plastic with the old six-color Apple logo in the corner. I picked up 10 of them for $50 on eBay a few years ago. It connects via the long-obsolete Apple Desktop Bus, requiring an adaptor for use with USB. I find the current keyboard offerings from Apple to be mediocre at best. If I am going to be typing more than a few paragraphs, I prefer to break out the old beige keybarge. I have often heard them referred to as "The One True Keyboard" by those who know. For me, the only thing that ever came close was the original keyboard that came with my IBM PC/XT (long since landfilled). I liked the springy sounds it made. Each key had a slightly different tone. Would love to have samples of those sounds to assign to keypresses. The sounds of serious typing...

    26. Re:Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Data about us is a far cry from being "our data".

    27. Re:Privacy by idlehanz · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, in Canadia grow-ops did exactly this when utilities were required to being reporting electricity usage. The typical solution was to go mobile with a pick-up truck and a diesel engine being the mobile generator.

      --
      Changing the world... one research project at a time.
  4. Also reveals schedules to thieves by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 2

    If they aren't protected with strong security, and thieves can extract the information, it's as good as people posting all that information on Facebook or similar.

    1. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by localman57 · · Score: 1

      Yes. I can just see the thieves breaking into the power comapny, finding the data, pouring over their data with statistical software to determine when you won't be home. Then breaking in with a crowbar to steal your TV.

      Granted, that's about what they did as part of finding UBL, but that's a different bunch of guys than the ones stealing TVs.

    2. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are protected with rediculously strong security.

    3. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Good thing my server and fridge are using massive amounts of electricity even when I'm in another country.

      (Sorry, environment.)

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    4. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      It happens, but not in that way. Here's an example. Several years ago my mom's car was stolen. A few years later, the cops called to tell her they haven't recovered it, but they know what happened to it. A guy who worked at the dealership was accessing the key code database. This database contains the info necessary to produce a key for a vehicle without actually having access to the key (useful if you lose your only copy of the key). He used this info to manufacture keys for a buddy who actually went out and stole the cars. The only way they figured it out was because the manufacturer had access controls on that data, noticed a larger than usual number of accesses from one dealer, investigated and found that many of those vehicle were reported stolen.

      So it does happen. And while the access controls allowed them to detect the breach after the fact, it was too late for my mom. The insurance payment certainly didn't make her whole. And in a home invasion, now you are more likely to have the thief actually confronting somebody, and you increase the chance of someone losing their life.

    5. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      Can you see thieves busting in over the Internet? Do you think these devices have firewalls? Do you think they're patched whenever an exploit is found?

      For that matter, are you certain the developers prevented access to the debugging ports?

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    6. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The meters have strong security when transmitting the data and it's something I work on. Utilities aren't always so so keen to turn it on immediately though. The bigger concern for me is how they protect the data once it is at the utility. The smart meter isn't the culprit at all, it is the database at the back office.

      Right now a lot of utilities are really in the dark ages. They're big and bulky organizations. And the bigger they are the slower they seem to be. My worry is that many of these utilities are shooting themselves in the foot here, doing everything in their power to screw up public relations and in return the public is going to insist they go back to inaccurate and inefficient 1940's analog meters. Articles like this may be read one way as encouraging better security but reading between the lines it can also be seen as yet one more panicky anti smart-meter diatribe to be lumped in with people who worry about RF allergies.

      If someone is worried about their data at the utilities then they should be worried even if there were no smart meters! The data is there no matter what the technology is! The only difference is the detail of the data. People who are hacking into networks are unlikely to do so in order to do physical burglary of houses. If you're concerned about privacy then why aren't you also worried about your credit/debit cards, your bank statements, your grocery cards, your phone records, the IRS databases, etc.

      The meters are not "spying". That's an awful title for this summary. They're recording your usage so that you can be charged for how much you use. The only difference from the 1940's is that the readings are now taken more than once a month (in practice many utilities won't even bother reading that often if it's snowy or you've got an angry dog so they'll estimate your usage). People could break into the utilities in the past to discover that you've got a second apartment set up for the mistress, or that you've turned off power for your August vacation. The only thing that is new here at all is that people are now more worried about privacy than they used to be.

    7. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by localman57 · · Score: 1

      Again, who cares? Nobody's gonna use this to steal your TV. The hackers will be able to tell when you're likely home and when you're likely not from the data. Maybe a little bit about what you're doing.

      And sure, you care. I care. But if you spend even a moment worrying about this, it means you're spending some of your worry-time that could be much better spent on things like worrying about protecting your Social Security Number, Credit Cards, and avoiding bee stings, drunk drivers, lightning bolts, badgers, and any of a million other things whose product of frequency x consequences are a lot higher than this smart meter thing.

    8. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by hawguy · · Score: 1

      If someone is worried about their data at the utilities then they should be worried even if there were no smart meters! The data is there no matter what the technology is!

      That's not exactly true -- without a smartmeter, my power company knows only how much power I use in a month, which is all they really need to know to bill me.

      With minute-by-minute data collection enabled by smartmeters, the power company can figure out what time I wake up the morning and when I go to bed. They can see what time I shower in the morning and if I have an on-demand hot water heater, they can figure out exactly long i spend in the shower. They can see what time I go to work and what time I come home. They can see which nights I sleep at my girlfriend's house, and which nights she sleeps with me. They can see when I'm on vacation.

      None of this data is visible to the power company without a smartmeter.

    9. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by Arlet · · Score: 1

      They can see which nights I sleep at my girlfriend's house, and which nights she sleeps with me.

      Like anybody gives a rat's ass.

    10. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by hawguy · · Score: 1

      They can see which nights I sleep at my girlfriend's house, and which nights she sleeps with me.

      Like anybody gives a rat's ass.

      My wife who is on an extended business trip would give a rat's ass.... "hey honey, how come our "average estimated occupancy" on our utility bill says "2 people" starting the day after I went to the UK on business and and went back to "1" the day before I came home? Who was sleeping here!?"

    11. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by Arlet · · Score: 1

      "I was just keeping the lights on because I missed you so much, honey"

    12. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      And in a home invasion, now you are more likely to have the thief actually confronting somebody, and you increase the chance of someone losing their life.

      Well, sure, but in this case that's the exactly why the thieves would want the info from the utility company. To avoid that and to take off with your TV while no-one is home.

      The violent home invasion is a ludicrously rare scenario drummed up by security companies. People don't want to pay $30/mo to protect their TV, but they'll pay whatever you ask to keep theoretical rapists at bay.

    13. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by ZFox · · Score: 1

      There was an episode on Masterminds, where an airline reservations agent was selling information about when families would be out of town to a local criminal organization.

    14. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      Mod up, please. Google Earth + Electricity habits.

      Why dont' we see this more of this in film, as that would act as a warning to the oblivious public? Who needs ultra tech in spy movies and crime dramas when the info is so readily available?

    15. Re:Also reveals schedules to thieves by idlehanz · · Score: 1

      Those hackers will probably find out I'm gone from 8-5 everyday. Damn them!

      --
      Changing the world... one research project at a time.
  5. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or you could use Facebook status updates:

    "ugh, just woke up, stupid alarm! FML!"
    "about to have a shower!"
    "shower was too cold! FML!"
    "Just got home, traffic was horrible! FML!"

    1. Re:Or... by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Maybe you could hook up your SmartMeter data directly to your Facebook and Twitter. It would just be a constant stream of KW/H data.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  6. Just curious by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

    How can this data be used against you in any way, other than the fact that someone can steal stuff from your house if they know you arent home?

    1. Re:Just curious by joocemann · · Score: 1

      Try thinking about it. Try thinking about yourself in other peoples' shoes, using this data to persecute or do wrong to someone... Be creative. Brainstorm.

      These tools were emphasized a lot in elementary school -- use them. I would spoonfeed, but that won't help you be a better thinker.

    2. Re:Just curious by chemicaldave · · Score: 1

      What about selling the data to your employer so they can keep track of you? Not as damaging as burglary, but still a huge invasion of privacy.

    3. Re:Just curious by Arlet · · Score: 1

      The power company doesn't know who I work for. Also, I can't imagine anything in my power usage that any employer would consider valuable information.

    4. Re:Just curious by Stormthirst · · Score: 1

      Why would your employer want to keep track of you at home? If you show up for work on time, don't take the pi$$ with well - pi$$ breaks/lunch breaks, and don't skip off home early, why would they care what time you had your shower in the morning? Are employers in the states that paranoid? Granted, if you work from home, that I guess that's one thing but the vast majority don't.

    5. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The power company doesn't know who I work for.

      But your employer likely knows where you live and can make a good guess on which power company to approach to ask for the data.

      Also, I can't imagine anything in my power usage that any employer would consider valuable information.

      Sometimes the malicious have better imaginations than the rest of us.

    6. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could figure out whether they left their computer on when they went to sleep or left the house. That could be used this to hack into encrypted computers by extracting the password from RAM.

      You could see all the unusually long showers people have.

      You could figure out how much and when they watch TV. If they watch at suspicious hours of the night, it's probably porn.

      You could look for spikes in power use coming from a PC to figure out what it is being used for. If it has suspiciously often at the range corresponding to videos being watched and cross-referencing doesn't see Internet use, it's probably illegal.

      You could discover how full the fridge and freezer is, when groceries are put inside them and when they are used. F ex if there is a big freezer that is suddenly filled a huge and/or warm mass, it might be a human in there.

    7. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the Federal Government might be interested to know why you are suddenly consuming several thousand watts an hour in off peak time on a perfect 12 hours on/ 12 hours off schedule.

      Instead of knowing just how much power you consume it is also possible to know when you consume it. Think about it.

    8. Re:Just curious by Arlet · · Score: 1

      I think the Federal Government might be interested to know why you are suddenly consuming several thousand watts an hour in off peak time on a perfect 12 hours on/ 12 hours off schedule.

      Well, I would certainly like to know that too! Maybe some malfunctioning appliance. What do you think ?

    9. Re:Just curious by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      Why would your employer want to keep track of you at home? If you show up for work on time, don't take the pi$$ with well - pi$$ breaks/lunch breaks, and don't skip off home early, why would they care what time you had your shower in the morning? Are employers in the states that paranoid? Granted, if you work from home, that I guess that's one thing but the vast majority don't.

      Maybe your boss wants to fool around with your wife that he met at the Christmas party - you're at work and power usage tell him someones home.

      Or worse yet (and more realistic) the window salesman wants to pay a visit to the non-working housewife while nobody is around to object to the sales pitch. Granted, they can just go door to door, but with data on who is home combined with say household income data and purchasing history they can save a LOT of time going to the homes most likely to buy.

    10. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. It's always important to "be creative" when trying to understand other people's behavoir. The more sinister and dramatic you can make them the better your theory will be, no doubt.

    11. Re:Just curious by Arlet · · Score: 1

      How does the window salesman get my income data, my power usage for that day, and my purchasing history ? Do you envision that all this data is just for sale for any random stranger ?

    12. Re:Just curious by lee1 · · Score: 2

      Why would your employer want to keep track of you at home?

      In the U.S. your employer probably pays most of your health insurance premium. Maybe he can get a better deal with the insurance company if he fires people whose personal habits match a profile that leads to higher health insurance claims.

    13. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell my employer doesn't care I'm at slashdot.

      Sincerely,
      A. Coward.

    14. Re:Just curious by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      How is this different from the data that is collected when you use your discount card at the local grocery? Or your frequent flyer account? Or your credit card? Or your school's student records?

    15. Re:Just curious by Plunky · · Score: 2

      Do you envision that all this data is just for sale for any random stranger ?

      Yes.

      Sorry, did you envision that all this data is just for sale to 'Trusted Persons' ? They won't be strangers, they will be customers!

    16. Re:Just curious by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The drug growing houses are trivial to spot. They're short term operations since they'll be caught in a month or two anyway when the utility comes around to read the meter and notice it's been tampered with or bypassed or that the power usage is immense for an unused house. Collecting data more often just means they'll be detected faster.

    17. Re:Just curious by Arlet · · Score: 1

      So, no need to worry about crude stuff like power usage to guesstimate when my wife is home, and I'm gone. They can just buy the phone location data from our cell phones, which should be much more valuable.

      With the cell phone data, they can see exactly how many persons are in the house, or, if they are away, they can see how long before they can reach the house.

    18. Re:Just curious by dch24 · · Score: 1

      Simple. This is data collected about you without your consent or knowledge. Further, you have practically no control over their data collection.

      If you use your discount card, then get scammed because of the data, you'll respond by changing your purchasing habits. There's the incentive for the grocery to protect you: you'll go somewhere else. And you'll think about it because you have to swipe the card to give them data.

      If the only power company in the area requires all homes have smart meters, and then you get scammed, what do they care? You can go off-grid... Yeah, they don't care.

      And the majority of the homes in the area won't have any clue that their meter is collecting all this data.

    19. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, they likely can figure it out, because they likely ran a credit check on you. or can, whenever they want to.

    20. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn inconvenient time to run out of mod points...

    21. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you begin using an unusually amount of electricity for growing pot.

    22. Re:Just curious by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      What's the solution - be off the grid in the dark ages, or go back to analog meters in the dark ages? It's impossible to have tiered pricing without smarter meters, it's impossible to quickly detect outages and brownouts w/o smarter meters, customer's can't monitor their own usage easily w/o smarter meters.

      They already have this data before smart meters. It may not have been as fine grained, but they certainly had your monthly data. Same for your water and gas usage. If having hourly usage is a privacy concern, then why isn't monthly usage data a privacy concern?

    23. Re:Just curious by dch24 · · Score: 1

      If having hourly usage is a privacy concern, then why isn't monthly usage data a privacy concern?

      Because humans operate on hourly (and 24-hourly) cycles, and monthly data is too coarse-grained to perceive these finer-grained cycles.

      I agree with you that technological progress has resulted in a catch-22: dark-ages analog meters? No power at all?

      I think PG&E is about to discover the two-edged nature of being a government-regulated monopoly. Although they get government regulations that protect them, now all of a sudden they can't do things, because the government is regulating them.

    24. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There will be a million ways to mis use, monitize this data. Just wait for other applications to pop up which will use this data. Eg. SMS was just texting. Now see how many apps are in market around SMS feature in phones. Apps that can profile the stored SMS and give relationship status. Apps that can see time stamp and create authorer profiles are early riser, stock viewer, chatter etc, apps that can block SMS. Apps that can geolocate the mobile based on header information in the SMS, apps that will alert user based on SMS from important contacts, apps that will forward SMS to other people automatically, apps that will sechdule sending SMS based on content etc etc. Once data is avaialble, there will be ways to figure out how to use the data and apps and other privacy concerns around it. the only way to implement these solutions are to encrypt, make it illegal to access if you still want usage of smart meters

    25. Re:Just curious by sjames · · Score: 1

      No, but your employer can be pretty sure who your power company is. Funny, Arlet claimed he was sick yesterday, but his power usage pattern was more consistent with going out for the day...

    26. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: "I have no idea either, but it scares me FOX style."

    27. Re:Just curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?

      You work at a place with enough free cycles and capitol to justify spending cash and man hours on finding out when you wake up and leave for work? If it is even you and not your wife, kid(s), roommate, dishwasher set on delay to run while you are away....

      Pretty sketchy argument, really. And I have much better things to worry about, such as things which might actually kill or maim me, so I have decided to skip worrying too much about anything with a less than 10% chance of negatively affecting me. Which eases my stress and stress can be a contributor to heart disease - the number one killer of all things human.

    28. Re:Just curious by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      Any sort of meter that figures out electrical use might be used to determine electrical use habits. And at some level, people might guess what the reason is for increased or decreased electrical usage. If use goes way down for a week, it fits a pattern of going on vacation. Or maybe being out of town on a business trip. Or maybe something else. If you shower every morning at 7:00 a.m., there will be an increased use of power at some point after 7:00 a.m if you have a tank based electric water heater. There will be an immediate increase if you have a on demad meter, and almost none if you use gas.

      Here's the fun part though, Mr. Gribble. You can mess with their heads by using your computer to turn on or off various items while you are away, leading them to mistakenly think you are there. You can huddle in the basement with all the power turned off and they'll think you're gone. Oh the yummy paranoid fun.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  7. Oil company shills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trying to stir up FUD about smart meters. Enforcing energy poverty is more important than risk to your privacy.

  8. Classic TEMPEST by Gazoogleheimer · · Score: 1

    So you install a constant-velocity motor generator set and...

    well, if you were a military installation protecting something important, then it'd be a bit different. Yes, it's very wrong to sell it to a commercial entity, but it's not wrong at all to collect it. You're buying power from these people -- it would be like asking your water company to stop using their AMR equipment. Or gas -- oh no, they know when my water heater cycles and I use the stove. It's strange, I feel that people are diverging on privacy. On the one hand, they don't care about privacy of their personal lives and relationships (re: Facebook) but now they care that someone knows how much electricity they're using? Enlighten me if you disagree with my opinion that this is all a bit silly (remembering that I am not saying that commercial sale of this data is OK)

    1. Re:Classic TEMPEST by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, they don't care about privacy of their personal lives and relationships (re: Facebook) but now they care that someone knows how much electricity they're using?

      Some of us don't use Facebook or other social media with a real name attached for that very reason. Why should we be lumped in with the unwashed masses who give away CC numbers for a free soda?

      Water/power are utilities, they are run by private companies but they are local government granted monopolies. That means we as the public get a say in how they are run and what they collect and what they use it for. I can't choose a different power or water company. Phone service has been much the same way until recent years.

      Internet would be a monopoly if it had been created at an earlier time, but currently it's only psuedo-monopoly via cable TV franchises. Wireless Broadband will further make this a choice option.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    2. Re:Classic TEMPEST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trick is that the gas company hasn't had the capacity to monitor your water heater use with temporal precision in the past. Now they can know that the heater kicks on between 7:30 and 8:00 M-F reliably -- probably to recover from your morning shower.

    3. Re:Classic TEMPEST by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, attitudes on privacy aren't diverging. You're just misrepresenting them.

      I post on Facebook what I choose to post. Therefore, Facebook posts are not a privacy violation (unless they ignore my privacy settings) because the act of making those posts was an act of explicit consent to share that information with the people I chose to share it with. Yes, stupid people will post stupid things that allow others to invade their privacy, but you can't legislate away stupidity.

      By contrast, I don't choose what information my water meter collects. Therefore, the water company should not be allowed to disclose any information that it collects. Similarly, Facebook should not be allowed to disclose anything that I don't explicitly allow them to disclose. And so on.

      Disclosure of private information should require explicit consent. The deeper you hide that consent in some service agreement, the bigger the privacy violation you're committing. Simple as that.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:Classic TEMPEST by LehiNephi · · Score: 1

      There's a key difference. When people post on facebook/foursquare/twitter/etc, they are willingly divulging the details of their own personal lives. When your electric company does the same thing with its customers' information, it will likely be done without their knowledge or consent, and not at the customers' initiative.

      It's about who controls the information.

      --
      Help find a cure for cancer. Join the [H]orde
    5. Re:Classic TEMPEST by localman57 · · Score: 1

      Actually, they have, but it's opt in. Most utilities have a program to pay you for control over your water heater. They shift it's on/off phase based on grid usage to lower their peaks. Energy cost is as much about peak infrastructure as about the total energy used.

    6. Re:Classic TEMPEST by toddestan · · Score: 1

      As far as I can tell those devices don't report back to the power company whether the load they are controlling is actually drawing power. The power company just cycles a bunch of them at random, and since some of them are bound to be running at the time the power usage goes down. I've seen the box controlling my AC compressor kill the power to it when I didn't even have the AC turned on at the thermostat.

  9. very interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    @Haffner: The hydro company only notifies the authorities if the bad guys growing marijuana don't pay their electricity bill; otherwise they are considered a profitable customer who pays on time - in which case why would they want to ruin a good thing? :)

    However on a more serious note, this piece makes a good point - I don't want this information sold off to the highest bidder.

  10. Of all the people that can access my data by ncttrnl · · Score: 2

    I seem to be the only person not allowed to collect data from the smart meter on my house. I have allow Google to collect the data for me or I can't access it at all.

    1. Re:Of all the people that can access my data by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Sure you can. Walk out to the meter and write down the numbers. It's easy to do this daily. If you want to do it hourly it's up to you. Get a Zigbee device to collect it for you.

    2. Re:Of all the people that can access my data by ncttrnl · · Score: 1

      I have a zigbee smart energy gateway. The power companies don't share the information needed to connect it to my meter. I suspect the reason is that they still have a certain amount of security through obscurity.

    3. Re:Of all the people that can access my data by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They're still rolling this stuff out. Not all electric meters are zigbee enabled either. Depending on who the utility is I suspect they may have just rolled out a generic smart meter w/o zigbee to your house and aren't willing to rush right out and swap it again.

  11. Still.... by wjousts · · Score: 1

    Beats letting some random stranger (potential murderer) in your house to read the meter.

    Also, "can reveal". Can being the operative word, really they are just inferring from spikes in electricity usage when certain things might be happening, they can't really tell the difference between taking a shower and suddenly turning on every appliance in your house just for shits and giggles. Nor can they tell the difference between leaving for work and deciding to sulk in complete darkness because you're feeling gothic. But yes, some annoymizing of the data would be nice (i.e. only summary data that shows when electricity usage typically peaks in certain types of household and not individual households exact usage).

    1. Re:Still.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beats letting some random stranger (potential murderer) in your house to read the meter.

      Most electric meters are actually installed outside the house.

      Also, "can reveal". Can being the operative word, really they are just inferring from spikes in electricity usage when certain things might be happening, they can't really tell the difference between taking a shower and suddenly turning on every appliance in your house just for shits and giggles.

      Given the price of electricity in the Peoples Republic of California, no one turns on every appliance for shits & gigles.

    2. Re:Still.... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      Beats letting some random stranger (potential murderer) in your house to read the meter.

      How does whether it is collected manually or electronically change the fact that it is collected? The latter is a bigger scope but can be done with the former especially since electric meters are usually outside anyway...

      they can't really tell the difference between taking a shower and suddenly turning on every appliance in your house just for shits and giggles.

      Except that nobody does that. Surveillance works with routines and normal. If they see your power drop every day at 8:30am, it's pretty clear you aren't home and they can now verify that by seeing your car(s) leave. The collected data lets them get a feel, then actual surveillance is used to go in when needed.

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    3. Re:Still.... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      How does whether it is collected manually or electronically change the fact that it is collected? The latter is a bigger scope but can be done with the former especially since electric meters are usually outside anyway...

      It's not collecting the meter read that's a problem, it's the unscrupulous folks who claim they're from the electric co. to read your meter when in fact they just found some uniform-ish looking clothes at the thrift store and want to see what sort of valuables you have in the house. Or, for that matter, the meter readers who really do work for the electric co. but whose night job isn't so honorable.

    4. Re:Still.... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

      it's the unscrupulous folks who claim they're from the electric co. to read your meter

      The meter is outside... And any modern utility has long since put distance readable meters so the techs don't even need to be in your yard...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    5. Re:Still.... by wjousts · · Score: 1

      especially since electric meters are usually outside anyway...

      Nope. Not round my way at least. My meter is in the basement (but uses broadband over power lines to communicate a reading).

      My boss got a shock last week when she happened to be home at lunch time. There was a key in the door and in walks the gas man, plain as day. Needless to say, she was more than a little freaked out. She recently moved house and apparently the gas man has keys to most of the houses in her neighborhood. I'd take a smart meter over that any day.

    6. Re:Still.... by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Most electric meters are actually installed outside the house.

      Not mine. Nor any of my neighbors.

    7. Re:Still.... by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Given the price of electricity in the Peoples Republic of California, no one turns on every appliance for shits & gigles.

      Way to miss the point.

    8. Re:Still.... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      the gas man has keys to most of the houses in her neighborhood.

      I call BS. Unless she or her family gave him a key, how did he get it?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    9. Re:Still.... by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      The difference is the time precision.

      My electricity meter is the old electromechanical one and is outside. The speed at which the disk is spinning indicates the power consumed, but if you want to know when I use more power you would have to stand next to the meter and count the revolutions. Or come to it a few times a day to take the readings.

      Of course the power company knows how much energy I use in a month, because I have to pay for it.

      The "smart meters" collect the data 750 to 3000 times a month, so up to about 100 times a day. This is way more data points that you could reasonably gather by sending people to take the readings.

    10. Re:Still.... by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      She'd recently moved in. How many people change all the locks when they buy a house? Fewer than probably ought to, I'd guess.

    11. Re:Still.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds WAY easier than hacking the encrypted data stream of meter data sent over the air on using frequency hopping.

    12. Re:Still.... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      the gas man has keys to most of the houses in her neighborhood.

      I call BS. Unless she or her family gave him a key, how did he get it?

      You missed this part, right:

      She recently moved house

      If it's a rental, I can see keeping the same keys, but for a purchase, the first thing you do is change all the locks.

    13. Re:Still.... by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      Except that nobody does that. Surveillance works with routines and normal. If they see your power drop every day at 8:30am, it's pretty clear you aren't home and they can now verify that by seeing your car(s) leave. The collected data lets them get a feel, then actual surveillance is used to go in when needed.

      Clearly we need a fix for this car exploit that lets people see we're not home just by using their eyes. It's far too simple and cheap! The government needs to shut down all traffic until they find a way to obscure or anonymize all cars leaving/entering residential districts.

    14. Re:Still.... by wjousts · · Score: 1

      but for a purchase, the first thing you do is change all the locks.

      Which is exactly what I told her, despite the fact that I didn't do it myself (we did eventually - at least on the front door, the other doors are all bolted from the inside). But it never occurred to me that the reason to do it might be that the gas man would just randomly wander into my house one day!

    15. Re:Still.... by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it's possible that I have just always missed them...but I can't recall ever seeing a meter man anytime in the last 15 years. And I have worked 1st shift, 2nd shift, 3rd shift, and not at all in that time frame. Maybe they just don't do that at all in my area.

    16. Re:Still.... by Barny · · Score: 1

      Not sure what your 'smart' meters are like then, the one I just had installed uses a wireless network to upload the data.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    17. Re:Still.... by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      People actually don't change the locks when they move in?

      I went from the closing to the house with my locks that were already in my car. I'd owned the house less than an hour when the locks were changed.

      That would be like taking over for another sysadmin and not changing the passwords immediately.

    18. Re:Still.... by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      Better than that when you are logged in conected to one of these meters you see real time electrcity use (there is about half a second lag).

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    19. Re:Still.... by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Which has nothing to do with being in the house or outside the house. In fact being wireless would suggest that putting it in the house would make more sense (less exposure to the elements). We have BPL available in our area, and why I don't subscribe to it, my meter uses it anyway. It's one of the side benefits of the system the local utility installed.

    20. Re:Still.... by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Not everybody is that paranoid. Whether that's a good thing or not is beside the point.

    21. Re:Still.... by Barny · · Score: 1

      I agree, but the standard for all homes built here is that the meter boxes be mounted on an exterior wall, and has been for a very very long time.

      Of course it wasn't the property owners charged for these meters, it was the consumers, I had mine installed 3 days before I was served an eviction notice, think about that, I not only paid for their smart meter to be installed as a capital improvement but then had to leave the premises right away.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    22. Re:Still.... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      Most electric meters are actually installed outside the house.

      Both my gas and electricity meters are inside my house. My electricity meter is relatively accessible, in a cupboard up above my front door in my hallway. My gas meter is in my living room, in a cupboard behind my TV, and it's a royal pain in the ass to get into. I'm eagerly awaiting a smart gas meter with an embedded SIM card.

      That said, as long as you submit your own readings from the meters, the energy companies only send somebody round to read it once every six months, maybe even less frequently than that.

    23. Re:Still.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're a decent landlord the first thing you do when a renter moves out to prep for future renters is chance the lock cores.

      But then if the landlord gave the key to the gasman in the first place, that kinda ruins things.

      (I rent a place out; I also check it daily when I have no one in it. I change the locks so I'm less likely to walk in and find someone wandering around loose in there!)

  12. Blanket laws by Palmsie · · Score: 1

    How many /. articles has there been just this past week on companies getting in trouble with the data they collect about their customers? It seems like there needs to be pretty broad laws that cover how ALL companies are allowed to handle user data. Arguing that they shouldn't collect that data, I think, is a bit silly, especially because it helps companies focus on what products to make or how to better tailor their resources to fit consumer needs. However, selling the privacy I entrusted to company X to company Y is a bit unacceptable. Why not have broad laws that cover these things that allow for opt-in (not opt-out) so we can stop hearing about this nonsense. It's the function of the government to define the rules of the game... where's my government!

    --
    Carl Sagan quotes get you an automatic +5 on all posts.
    1. Re:Blanket laws by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Arguing that they shouldn't collect that data, I think, is a bit silly, especially because it helps companies focus on what products to make or how to better tailor their resources to fit consumer needs.

      Or, if they're the power company, it lets them screw their customers by charging more for power while not building more power stations and knowing customers have little or no other option unless they want to disconnect from the grid.

    2. Re:Blanket laws by Palmsie · · Score: 1

      Totally a possibility.

      --
      Carl Sagan quotes get you an automatic +5 on all posts.
    3. Re:Blanket laws by malacandrian · · Score: 1

      Why not have broad laws that cover these things that allow for opt-in (not opt-out) so we can stop hearing about this nonsense. It's the function of the government to define the rules of the game... where's my government!

      Like the data protection act? (A somewhat more understandable version).It's not quite what you're talking about, but it's close.

  13. Tin Foil Hat Time! by LordStormes · · Score: 2

    This is getting ridiculous. Half the posts on /. are "Oh noes, companies can find out when I X!" If companies want that information, they'll just look at your Facebook account, where you posted pictures of your office, your cat, check-in data at the porn store up on the corner, and links to your YouTube video of your marijuana plants for all the world to see. We cannot simultaneously be a society that wants to share everything and keep everything secret.

    1. Re:Tin Foil Hat Time! by chemicaldave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The flaw in your logic is that not everyone uses facebook. Facebook is voluntary, the electric meter is not.

    2. Re:Tin Foil Hat Time! by LordStormes · · Score: 1

      Not everyone does, but I am willing to bet that at least 60-70% of the /. userbase does.

    3. Re:Tin Foil Hat Time! by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      We cannot simultaneously be a society that wants to share everything and keep everything secret.

      There are 2 major differences between posting stuff on the web, and companies spying on you and selling that information:
      1. Anything somebody posts up on the web for the world to see is something they (or at least somebody present at the time) chose to post. And we don't share everything: Somebody could post "I just got married to a wonderful lady!" and include a picture of the bride in her wedding dress, but not include her bra size or her credit score or the fact that they met in an S&M club.

      2. When people give their information away, they are exchanging it for a service of some kind (e.g. hosting their video in a publicly accessible and searchable way). When companies spy on people, they are taking it with no compensation at all. Since this data has value (otherwise, you couldn't exchange it for services, nor could the company who collects it sell it or use it), the companies in question are basically stealing it.

      So we're not a society that wants to "share everything", we're a society in which some people choose to share some things in exchange for some services. And we don't (necessarily) want to "keep everything secret", but we do want to have control over what's secret and what's not, and get something in exchange for what we choose to not keep secret.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    4. Re:Tin Foil Hat Time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. This is true. The illitterate and stupid ones.

    5. Re:Tin Foil Hat Time! by LordStormes · · Score: 1

      This from someone who can't handle the signup process for a /. account?

    6. Re:Tin Foil Hat Time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he hurt your feelings? Why don't you go cry about it in Twitter? If you're lucky someone may pretend to care.

  14. This should be obvious... by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

    Smart meters can pinpoint time of usage. Of course it's possible to extrapolate the user's living habits from this additional data. The summary makes it sound like the thing is intentionally spying. You could do the same thing with the old analog meters except it would be more along the lines of "they probably went on vacation this month" since the sampling interval by the power company was monthly. Smart meters are like reading the analog dials every 5 minutes (or whatever the sampling interval is).

    Or for the paranoid: all someone would need to do is point a camera at your analog meter dials transmitting back to an unmarked van recording the values every 15 minutes.

    --
    this is my sig
    1. Re:This should be obvious... by chemicaldave · · Score: 1

      all someone would need to do is point a camera at your analog meter dials transmitting back to an unmarked van recording the values every 15 minutes.

      Just because it's easy to do doesn't mean it should be done, especially on such a large scale as this. I don't understand the hate for the proposal. It's taking preventative measures to make sure this data doesn't all into the wrong hands.

    2. Re:This should be obvious... by Arlet · · Score: 1

      all someone would need to do is point a camera at your analog meter dials transmitting back to an unmarked van recording the values every 15 minutes.

      I think I would notice a camera set up inside my house.

    3. Re:This should be obvious... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Almost every utility I know of uses one hour intervals.

    4. Re:This should be obvious... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The hate may be due to the biased and absurd title of the summary; first using the word "spying" and second referring to the meters instead of the utilities. It has the feel of a smart meter opposition piece when the real problem if any is in the utilities' back office.

    5. Re:This should be obvious... by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      They're doing a smart meter rollout in my city to be completed by the end of next year. The FAQ says our interval will be 15 minutes:

      Q: What is a Smart Meter?
      A: Smart meters are digital devices that collect energy-use data and, unlike traditional meters, transmit and receive data, too. Electric energy use will be recorded every 15 minutes to provide an accurate view of your daily energy patterns. Information can be accessed via the myaccount web tool on nvenergy.com or through NV Energy's automated voicemail system the day after it is collected. For customers in northern Nevada, natural gas information will be available on a daily basis.

      --
      this is my sig
    6. Re:This should be obvious... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The real problem is that they are gathering a load of data that was not previously gathered. "Smart" meters are the tool that let them do this. That data is legitimately useful to the utilities both to track consumption trends and to implement charging structures that more realisitically reflect the cost of electricity. However it can also reveals when people are active in the house VS when they are asleep or out. Some would consider such data far more sensitive than occasional readings of total usage, information that many homeowners would legitimately rather was not widely available.

      This isn't really so much a technical problem as a social one, societies need to decide how much data it is acceptable for utilities to collect, how they may use that data and what steps they must take to protect it. The trouble is in some areas either smartmeters are getting deployed before the legislature have considered the issues or the legislature are too in the pockets of big buisness to care about the public that elected them.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:This should be obvious... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Data is collected after the fact. Sure you may figure out when someone is likely to be gone (ie, all power goes out at 9am, therefore you can break in at 10am and not worry) but it's simpler to just drive around the neighborhood and get a feel for the place (wait until everyone leaves the house). But they already have monthly data; you can figure out the months when someone is likely to be on vacation.

      "Legislators considered the issues" means they'll debate non-issues like RF allergies or utilities cutting off grandma's life support.

    8. Re:This should be obvious... by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      15 minute and 30 minute intervals in Australia depending what state your in.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    9. Re:This should be obvious... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Most people's meters in the U.S. are placed outside so they can be read without letting anyone come in. Before smart meters, you'd see the truck once a month and the guy wearing a brightly colored vest identifying him as a meter reader walking through back yards taking the readings.

  15. The lesson by Toe,+The · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The lesson here: any data that is collectable will be collected. Any data that is usable will be used.

    It would be entirely naive to think that law enforcement would restrain themselves from using data that is right there for the taking. All it takes is a little strong-arming of the company in charge of the data.

    That includes consumption of electricity, water, gas, internet, cable-tv, UPS-deliveries, and anything else someone else pumps into your house.

    1. Re:The lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then screw with their data by using a grid-tie battery bank and a computerized charger. I'm sure you can "simulate" another routine or just pull your electricity for the day in bulk when the rates are lower. A 12V car battery holds about 1kWh of electricity and can last for 7 years. Size accordingly. As a side benefit, your home wouldn't have any problems with brownouts and would be ready for a future solar installation.

    2. Re:The lesson by Stormthirst · · Score: 2

      Better yet use a commercially available "leisure battery", which are designed to hold more power, but release it more slowly than a car battery. And pay for it with cash so they don't spot what you're doing on your credit card.

      Personally I think this is a little crazy and tin foil hat, but there is a serious point here. The power grid would be more efficient if you could even out a lot of the power spikes that occur. I still remember when I was a small child visiting a small lake that was at the top of a mountain (I think in Wales), which was discharged through some turbines when the commercial breaks came on the TV in the local area to cope with thousands of people turning their kettles on to boil water for tea. After the water was discharged, and the power grid had returned to a more normal state the water would be pumped back up the mountain ready for the next commercial break.

    3. Re:The lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its cheaper to bypass the meter and just steal the power for your illegal activities.

      Dangerous maybe, but certainly cheaper.

    4. Re:The lesson by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      I still remember when I was a small child visiting a small lake that was at the top of a mountain (I think in Wales), which was discharged through some turbines when the commercial breaks came on the TV in the local area to cope with thousands of people turning their kettles on to boil water for tea. After the water was discharged, and the power grid had returned to a more normal state the water would be pumped back up the mountain ready for the next commercial break.

      I guess you refer to Dinorwig, which is one of the many pumped-storage hydroelectric stations in the world. They pump water up to the reservoir when the baseload generation is not being used (typically night time). Then generate power as a hydro station when consumption exceeds the baseload generation. It's a way of smoothing the day-night variations in power, but the switching time for the flows is too slow for it to respond in the time scale of a TV commercial.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    5. Re:The lesson by peragrin · · Score: 1

      What you said happens during large sporting events, where the breaks in the game means a sudden increase in snacks being gathered.

      Of course your right. The real solution to our power problems isn't wind or solar or tidal, but a decent high density high energy storage system in every home. Something like 10-20 times that of the best batteries in the world. That way solar and wind can augment the power company and level out the entire grid.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    6. Re:The lesson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lesson here: any data that is collectable will be collected. Any data that is usable will be used.

      It would be entirely naive to think that law enforcement would restrain themselves from using data that is right there for the taking. All it takes is a little strong-arming of the company in charge of the data.

      That includes consumption of electricity, water, gas, internet, cable-tv, UPS-deliveries, and anything else someone else pumps into your house.

      Indeed. At this point, I'm surprised they haven't gotten in the habit of taking smell samples.

  16. Smart Meters... dumb paranoia by webdog314 · · Score: 1

    Smart Meters don't know anything about when you leave for work or use your toaster, or when you shower, or anything else specific about your energy use beyond how many kW you are using at any given time. They record your energy usage at set intervals, which data can then be used to *guess* how you may be using it. If you happen to have fifty lights in your home that are all on until the moment you walk out the door to go to work in the morning, then yes, they could probably guess when you leave... or, it could just be that you were using your oven for an early morning batch of muffins. They don't have specifics on your appliances (yet), and they don't record anything about *you*.

    Where I live, it's FAR more likely they would guess when I use my air conditioning, which can easily quadruple my hourly usage when on.

    1. Re:Smart Meters... dumb paranoia by Bergs007 · · Score: 2

      It's actually pretty easy to generate an appliance profile for a house and figure out which appliances are on at any given time, even for loads as low as 10W. Considering the time delays between running around to every device in your house, it's also possible to figure out in what order the appliances were turned on! Relevant papers: http://seclab.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BergmanJJTGW11.pdf http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/MPRV.2010.71

    2. Re:Smart Meters... dumb paranoia by bioster · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think appliances have distinct and identifiable energy signatures, and depending on the detail the meter records this could easily translate to dependable information about you and your habits.

      See regular spikes over the year on weekdays, starting at 7am which end at 8am? Your routine involves waking up at 7am, and leaving for work at 8am.
      Regular spikes starting at 7am that last throughout the day (but level off at 8am)? Your routine is waking up at 7am, and working from home.

      700 watt spike most mornings for 30 seconds? Your toast.

      Likewise, your water heater will have a particular wattage and they could use that to tell when you shower.

      Thing is, maybe they don't know what the specifics are for your appliances... until they care. Once someone cares, they can make a profile of energy signatures (1100 watt spike for .1 seconds followed by constant usage of 1500w for at least 10 seconds? Hey, that's the pattern for a brand X model 1a1 water heater!), and then start data mining. Yes, I'm sure they'd make mistakes, but overall they could form a pretty accurate portrait of your daily life.

      I think either A) you are underestimating the amount of usable data you can get by data mining or B) you are assuming that the smart meters must be limited to a rather coarse granularity such as total usage per hour... where in fact there's nothing stopping it from recording usage per second or even microsecond.

    3. Re:Smart Meters... dumb paranoia by Bergs007 · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think appliances have distinct and identifiable energy signatures, and depending on the detail the meter records this could easily translate to dependable information about you and your habits. See regular spikes over the year on weekdays, starting at 7am which end at 8am? Your routine involves waking up at 7am, and leaving for work at 8am. Regular spikes starting at 7am that last throughout the day (but level off at 8am)? Your routine is waking up at 7am, and working from home. 700 watt spike most mornings for 30 seconds? Your toast. Likewise, your water heater will have a particular wattage and they could use that to tell when you shower. Thing is, maybe they don't know what the specifics are for your appliances... until they care. Once someone cares, they can make a profile of energy signatures (1100 watt spike for .1 seconds followed by constant usage of 1500w for at least 10 seconds? Hey, that's the pattern for a brand X model 1a1 water heater!), and then start data mining. Yes, I'm sure they'd make mistakes, but overall they could form a pretty accurate portrait of your daily life. I think either A) you are underestimating the amount of usable data you can get by data mining or B) you are assuming that the smart meters must be limited to a rather coarse granularity such as total usage per hour... where in fact there's nothing stopping it from recording usage per second or even microsecond.

      You basically just gave the summary for this paper: http://seclab.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/BergmanJJTGW11.pdf

    4. Re:Smart Meters... dumb paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My water heater is gas, you insensitive clod!

    5. Re:Smart Meters... dumb paranoia by flahwho · · Score: 1

      Someone who knows what they are talking about!

    6. Re:Smart Meters... dumb paranoia by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      Not only that smart meters record power factor which can be used to determine if your using inductive or capacitive appliances.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    7. Re:Smart Meters... dumb paranoia by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      We have smart meters for gas aswell.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    8. Re:Smart Meters... dumb paranoia by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Some of those meters are pretty smart. They could monitor the power factor, and from there they know what kind of load is being drawn (resistive, inductive) and then can guess at what the power is being used for. They could easily tell your electric water heater (resistive load) apart from the air conditioner (inductive load). They could probably figure out whether you primary use CFLs or incandescents for lighting. They can also monitor the different phases so they can tell the 115 V and 230 V loads apart.

  17. Will reveal a lot more than your energy usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I make these devices and at least my company considers home owners privacy very important.

    Two things people need to understand:
    1) These device will collect a lot of information about your power consumption and the type of power consumed. We can tell if an inductive load has come on versus a resistive load. Large appliances will likely have individual readings. (pool pump, water heater, air conditioner)
    2) You are not unique. There are thousands of people who behave, share political views, and have an income and education levels similar to you. And people similar to you will have a very similar electrical usage signature. e.g. Give me a large enough sample of people and their electrical usage plus their voting histories and I can figure out other peoples voting histories just by their energy usage.

    1. Re:Will reveal a lot more than your energy usage by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

      Correlation does not imply causation, but to an advertiser, marketing hack or political spin-doctor that doesn't matter.

      --
      Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
    2. Re:Will reveal a lot more than your energy usage by PPH · · Score: 1

      I make these devices and at least my company considers home owners privacy very important.

      But you have no control over what your customers (the utilities) do with the data your product collects. You may have implemented some data security protocols to prevent tampering or unauthorized access. But once the utility has read the data, its beyond your companies control.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  18. Sometimes I feel like the only one... by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

    ...that sees through the BS that surrounds these smart meters. The power company will say something like this: "this great new technology helps you use energy more efficiently, so you can be more green!" This is what I hear: "We are going to install new meters that allow us to charge you more for electricity when you use it when you most need it."

    I need /. to let me know... am I the only one?

    -d

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    1. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      This is what I hear: "We are going to install new meters that allow us to charge you more for electricity when you use it when you most need it."

      It costs them more to generate electricity during peak periods (because they save the most expensive power generation for when they really need it), so why shouldn't they charge more when it costs them more?

      Also, when it costs them less, they charge less than they do with flat-rate billing. This gives people an ability to economize that doesn't exist with flat-rate billing.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    2. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      It costs them more to generate electricity during peak periods (because they save the most expensive power generation for when they really need it), so why shouldn't they charge more when it costs them more?

      What incentive do they have to build more power stations to support peak demands, if they can just charge more and know that there's no real competition?

    3. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your right! the only real benefit to consumer is if you can access your own meter data.

    4. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      What incentive do they have to build more power stations to support peak demands, if they can just charge more and know that there's no real competition?

      Residential solar panels, which conveniently reach peak output around the same time of day that conventional electricity becomes the most expensive to produce, is competition.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    5. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by localman57 · · Score: 1

      "We are going to install new meters that allow us to charge you more for electricity when you use it when you most need it."

      I need /. to let me know... am I the only one?

      That energy really is the most important, and when you need it most is when everybody else in your neighborhood does too.

      In the power utility where I worked we had a "peaker" which was basically a jet engine on blocks which kicked in at peak time, when the cost of buying surplus (if any) off the grid exceeded the cost of running the peaker. The cost per kwh (energy produced) was much, much higher than the coal plant. But the cost per kw (power capacity) was much, much lower. Since it only ran maybe 100 hours per year, in the afternoon of the hottest days, this made sense. That marginal electricity had all the cost of the peaker hardware, plus the cost of Jet fuel rather than coal. Very expensive indeed.

      Or, don't have a peaker, and enjoy your rolling blackouts. A few days each summer of rolling blackouts, and everybody'd forget about this smart meter thing...

    6. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      And as I suggested in the original post, that peak period just happens to be the only time I really need to use electricity. The rest of the time, I'm asleep or at work. So, in effect, they are just charging me more.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    7. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      I understand the generation issue, for sure. However look at it from the perspective of the consumer. We currently have flat rate power. You want us to agree to (and in some cases PAY FOR) the new meters which will eventually make me pay a great deal more for the same service I'm getting right now.

      The commercials even show a person waiting for the light to turn green before turning on the AC unit. Who does that? It's hot when it's hot. It would be better to focus on more efficient appliances. Then, the customer and the power company both get what they want.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    8. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      You don't have to do laundry or run the dishwasher during the peak period, and you can probably find more ways to cut your electrical usage during the peak period. When the electric company is able to charge by the time of day according to what it costs them to provide the electricity, it gives you an opportunity to economize that wouldn't otherwise exist.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    9. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      Get six batteries and an invertor, charge up on off peak, use batteries on peak (have some appliences always pluged in like a fridge), you will save a fourtune. The electrcicty provider is happy cause there is less stress on the network during peak.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    10. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      The jet engine is correct, but it burns natural gas with diesel as a backup. Jet engine gas turbine. But you're correct, they only run them when the solar wind farms and coal plants (the "cheap" energy) are already maxed out.

    11. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      But the power company cannot control that. Further, in California, they cannot just charge more willy-nilly. So, Time of Use billing is as fair as they can get to try to balance things out.

    12. Re:Sometimes I feel like the only one... by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      I think the conspiracy is only in your head.

      My electricity company sent me an electricity monitor free of charge. It's not a meter and doesn't replace my regular old-fashioned meter, but it does give me a visualisation of how much electricity I'm using in real-time.

      This gives me some of the advantages of a smart meter without giving the utility company any new information whatsoever.

  19. Didn't the state government promote these? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2

    I may be remembering incorrectly, but it seems to me that I remember the California Public Utilities Commission pushing the utilities to install these. If that is correct, why did they wait until now to investigate the privacy implications? Wouldn't the correct time to have investigated the privacy implications been before you pushed the utilities to install these all over the place? I do know that when these were first introduced there were a lot of people asking these very questions.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    1. Re:Didn't the state government promote these? by flahwho · · Score: 1

      its obviously a much less informed legislator(s) riding the coattails of the ipod -privacy stories.

    2. Re:Didn't the state government promote these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because NOW they can appear to be acting on the people's behalf, when the money has already been spent (handed over to smart-meter vendors), and there is no money for a program to un-install all those smart-meters.

      Smart-meter vendors get paid, agency appears to be looking out for the little guy, your tax dollars support the whole thing. Everybody wins! (except you, of course)

  20. Stolen is going to a problem also! by DadLeopard · · Score: 1

    Selling the info is bad enough, but at least those who buy it are JUST going to be trying to sell you stuff! The ones who steal or hijack this info are much more likely to cause you a lot more harm, and since it is going to be spread around to many different organizations and businesses, inevitably some are not going to adequately secure the data and it will be stolen and sold again to be used for criminal purposes! I predict that not too far in the future, if it isn't already available, there will be those cruising your street and harvesting this info direct from the source, or hacking into it remotely for the same reason, just cutting out the middle man!

  21. Uhh, Haven't these meters been hacked? by xkr · · Score: 1

    I am 95% sure these meters have all been hacked. I saw a demo in first person. (It might have been faked, I suppose.)

    So, the bad guys drive around to find out who is on vacation?

    --
    I will create a sig when innovation restarts in the U.S.
    1. Re:Uhh, Haven't these meters been hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, does this mean that I need to continue to leave my A/C set at the same amount, have the TV come on and off when it usually does with a timer along with a few lights? Basically, if I use a bunch of energy when I'm not there and it would be more environmentally friendly to not use it, then I can protect my privacy and say screw the planet. Okay, sounds good. "Being Green == Less Privacy"

    2. Re:Uhh, Haven't these meters been hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't all the same meter or even the same network technology. If you're going to claim X has been hacked, you should be specific.

      Or to put it another way, just because IE has a security hole doesn't mean that Firefox has the same security hole. Also, just because finger had a bug that allowed the Morris worm doesn't mean that the Morris worm would work today.

    3. Re:Uhh, Haven't these meters been hacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not heard of this hacking and I work on some of these. Do you have links?

      Maybe someone hacked a zigbee device or some poorly designed meter that uses wifi? And they were hacked to do what, snoop on data or reprogram meters? I'm not saying they're not hackable but if someone can just do a drive by to hack them then I'd suspect an inside job, someone with knowledge of the hardware and software and RF. As for snooping, these don't send private data constantly but rather once a day would be typical.

      There's no standard meter out there, no common meter RF protocol, no common meter bandwidth, and everyone has a custom OS and hardware.

  22. Amusing by Windwraith · · Score: 1

    For some reason this doesn't sound as threatening as my credit card data or internet history being leaked...

    1. Re:Amusing by Americano · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not sure I see the invasive privacy concern of somebody knowing "when you wake up, when you leave for work and come home, when you go on vacation and when you take a shower."

      It seems oddly paranoid to me that we'd consider these mundane details of daily life "sensitive private information." Is "your privacy is at risk!" becoming the new "won't somebody think of the children?!" I just don't see a very serious privacy concern over somebody knowing that I take a shower at 7:30 each morning. My neighbors all already know this, it's not like it's my super-secret PIN code or financial account passwords.

  23. Past history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government/law enforcement has a proven history of using power metering in order to obtain warrants to search the premises, so perhaps it makes more sense in that light. "Your power consumption is way out of profile for your service demographic, ergo we believe you are conducting illegal activities..."

    Of course, if you are of the "I have nothing to hide, so let them search/datamine/whatever" mindset then perhaps this won't prove convincing. These data have been abused in the past, even at the gross, monthly-metering sampling rate. It isn't surprising that people are somewhat paranoid about what new abrogations of civil rights might grow from having fine-grained data available.

    I would rather have commercial sale of this information (presuming a fantasy world where this sale could somehow preclude the government obtaining indirect access) than to allow the government to have access to the same. No annoying, profiling corporation can send armed squads to serve a "no knock" warrant to invade my domicile. This stands in stark contrast to the government. Naturally, of course, the best scenario would be if my power consumption remains a private matter solely between me and the power company and the information never goes any further than that.

    Of course, I also think it is crazy how much information people freely share online, so perhaps you would just classify me as a total privacy advocate. AC to be consistent with what I advocate...

  24. Paranoia run rampant? by GeekMarine72 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've worked for a firm that collects this data. The technology, as it's exists now, is incapable of the level of analysis described. The data is flow is massive and only summation for billing is viable. Even then, "sanitization" of data is common practices. While protective legislation and guidance is encouraged before it goes too far, there are far greater violations including IP address mapping between logins on identifying solutions (gmail, yahoo mail) and apparent "anonymous" sites. Flash Persisted Objects being one aspect, IP + browser fingerprinting, and collaboration between marketing organizations and online retailers are bigger risks. The part that sucks is we can't opt out of smart metering. Security is quite solid but if I had any advice to the PUCs it would be to mandate truck roles for power turn off / turn down. The current broadcast model on smart meters combined with the potential to brute force the master key for broadcasting means someone with a bit of knowledge and desire could inject into the meshed network a flag to shut down broad swaths of power consumers, which in turn could lead to a surge back into the grid causing other catastrophic outages. GM72

    1. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by russotto · · Score: 1

      I've worked for a firm that collects this data. The technology, as it's exists now, is incapable of the level of analysis described. The data is flow is massive and only summation for billing is viable.

      I can think of a few companies which could do the analysis. It's probably not even an order of magnitude larger than cell phone billing records, and smaller than cell phone location records. Even if it were technically infeasible to analyze the data now, that would change quickly.

      Safeguards are meaningless; given a good enough reason (profit, for the children, drug enforcement, national security: take your pick) the safeguards will simply be ignored. The only way to keep this data from being abused is to prevent it from being collected in the first place.

    2. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by Bergs007 · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about electrical data is that it compresses quite nicely if you intelligently select your thresholds. Essentially, if your algorithm is good enough, you can send discrete data points that correspond one-to-one with appliances turning on or off. And with each data point comprised of only 4 or 5 bytes, I'll let you all do the math.

    3. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by Fuji+Kitakyusho · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can't opt out of smart metering, but you can control your consumption pattern. On your side of the meter, you are perfectly within your rights to install any combination of batteries, inverters, relays, charging circuits and so forth. Look at your consumption averaged over a month, and configure your system to draw the appropriate constant current 24/7. Sure, this may not be cheap to implement, but if anyone is going to be purchasing my data, I want to be the one selling it.

    4. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by firewrought · · Score: 1

      The current broadcast model on smart meters combined with the potential to brute force the master key for broadcasting means someone with a bit of knowledge and desire could inject into the meshed network a flag to shut down broad swaths of power consumers.

      A neat solution for this is to give all customers a meter that physically lacks the remote control capability. Then, if a customer is bad about paying their bill, you swap out their meter for one that IS remote-controllable while doing the disconnect. This approach (1) saves the power company money on the initial smart meter implementation [each meter is a little cheaper without the remote control capability, I would think], (2) prevents a wide-scale attack, (3) saves a whole bunch of truck miles, and (4) lets the frequent offender get their power back quicker after a disconnect.

      I know of one large-scale smart meter implementation that is doing exactly this... I think they wait until the second or third disconnect too.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    5. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "The technology, as it's exists now, is incapable of the level of analysis described. The data is flow is massive and only summation for billing is viable..."

      For now... given what the intelligence agencies have planned for facebook/google it won't be long before the average company will have similar tools as costs are driven down and tech becomes more accessible.

    6. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The data is flow is massive and only summation for billing is viable.

      So you're saying that they're collecting too much data? Maybe you could, ya know, collect less data?

      The technology, as it's exists now, is incapable of the level of analysis described.

      And (thanks to Moore's law) they'll be able to process it all soon?

    7. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the variant you're working with is different than mine, but all the smart meters I work with certainly can collect realtime useage data, which is one of the selling points from the vendors. I don't want to get into specifics, but you can extrapolate a lot from realtime useage data, and yes, we can collect it.

      Posting as AC because my views may not reflect that of my employer..

    8. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The data is NOT sanitized. The Smart meter is built so the electric company doesn't have to send someone out to read it. They still bill you based on usage. And PG&E (in CA) told me I can access my usage online. He tried to show me but there were still bugs in the system. You can monitor you utility usage from the internet.

      So now there is a lot of data available. Why wouldn't a company come up with ways to make money on it?

    9. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The data is already being collected, and it has been collected for decades!

      If you do not want the person you buy your electricity from to know how much electricity you are using, then you must stop using electricity! Advocating the return to once a month reading of a meter when it is convenient using outdated and inaccurate analog meters means keeping an inefficient energy grid. You can't manage energy if you don't know how much there is or where it's going. Right now we have a good idea of this with regards to the transmission grid but it's much more murky at the distribution level and completely opaque at the end-user utilities.

      Alternately, in some countries people buy pre-paid electricity cards to plug into meters. Then the utilities don't know what you're using but this scheme is full of scammers.

    10. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      If your going to get all that equipment charge the batteries in the middle of the night on off peak power (very cheap) and run the inverter during the day. You will save a fortune and all the electric company will see is 6 hours of constant use from 11 to 5 in the morning.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    11. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Depends on the system. When done right, the wireless is encrypted and the messages are all signed. Last I checked AES256 was still safe. "Broadcast" is completely wrong. You cannot manage hundreds of thousands of meters (millions in big cities) with a broadcast network. It's unicast IPv6 using ULA (private) addressing with proper firewalling, etc.

    12. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree this is of a much bigger concern in the short term, it's really stupid how far corporations take progressive technologies on board purely for the sake of progression and not for any greater use.

      There was no real need for this system to be put in place but the people who are higher up read their charts and make their decisions based on extrapolated data, wanting to get in on the ground with the latest tech and sooner or later some skiddie will bust through and it'll be bedlam on the grid.

      It's the same with voip, over complicating a solution to a problem we never knew we had, making it less secure with less achievable uptime and stability... just because

    13. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by GeekMarine72 · · Score: 1

      I'm not wrong about broadcasting groups nor am I wrong about addressing. Most smart meters are not yet running IPv6, but rather another addressing schema allowing for broadcasting by groups and sub groups. IPv6 is coming, but it's not the standard at the moment. Additionally, broadcasting is handled, cryptographically, by using signed packets (but not necessarily encrypted). Targeted one to one communication between the data collection or meter data management system is the option of last resort. Perhaps not for the smaller installation, but the tech I worked on was focusing on the 1MM to 5MM meter range. SEE ANSI C12.22 / C12.19 Do you really believe a meter, with a manufacturing cost under $100 per unit would support hardware AES256? The ones I dealt with did not.

    14. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you've only dealt with low-end gear. What I say is production fact and what PG&E uses.

      Go and Google it yourself:
      site:silverspringnet.com aes
      site:silverspringnet.com ipv6

    15. Re:Paranoia run rampant? by russotto · · Score: 1

      The data is already being collected, and it has been collected for decades!

      Certainly it has not. A once a month reading is far less data than e.g. a once per second reading, and even that is less than a reading which tells which appliances are being used.

      Advocating the return to once a month reading of a meter when it is convenient using outdated and inaccurate analog meters means keeping an inefficient energy grid.

      Return? I'm still on that system. The only thing that has changed is the meter is read remotely.

      You can't manage energy if you don't know how much there is or where it's going. Right now we have a good idea of this with regards to the transmission grid but it's much more murky at the distribution level and completely opaque at the end-user utilities.

      You don't need to know at a level finer-grained than you can control. And I don't want the power company to be controlling power on a (residential) user-by-user or worse, appliance-by-appliance basis. I'm willing to live with some inefficiency (and resulting higher energy prices) for them to NOT be able to do that, because I can see it resulting in a lot of abuse for very little benefit.

  25. Smart Meters may also be security problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read that some of these Smart Meters may have firmware vulnerabilities that make them susceptible to worms that could reek havoc with the electrical grid.

  26. Can we stop with the tin foil hat articles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, it's getting ridiculous.

  27. Publish the API. by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

    Energy prices already fluctuate depending on usage times (even if you have abstracted this detail away with a fixed rate plan).

    What I want to see a public API for accessing this data so we can tell when to get the best drain for our bucks.

    Ultimately, I see this evolving similarly to the stock market. We can have computers that precisely control our lighting and appliances much like a high frequency trader's computers do.

    Imagine being able to get the absolute best price for electricity, (a few dollars cheaper per month than your neighbors!) except that the shower is never heated for more than a few minutes at a time, and turning on a light results in a sporadic strobe effect.

    1. Re:Publish the API. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and turning on a light results in a sporadic strobe effect.

      We already have those, they're called CFL bulbs.

    2. Re:Publish the API. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...the shower is never heated for more than a few minutes at a time..."

      What you want is an on-demand/tankless water heater then. We had one in New England when our furnace was powered by truck-delivered oil. Totally saved a ton of money compared to running a tank.

      Even with gas or electric, tankless is the way to go IME.

    3. Re:Publish the API. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...the shower is never heated for more than a few minutes at a time, and turning on a light results in a sporadic strobe effect."

      That sounds like a normal day in rural Ukraine.

    4. Re:Publish the API. by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      I live alone, usually only take one shower a day.....hell, I'm sure I don't even average one shower a day (see the live alone statement)....and I pay about $30-$35 a month for gas just for hot water (tank style heater). And the shower is the only use of hot water, and I always take quick showers thru the week because I sleep until the last possible second. I use paper plates and plastic utensils (see, live alone) about 98% of the time so there is no dishwasher, only wash clothes with cold.

      So, at least where I live (which is probably cheaper than most other places) a gas tank water heater is gonna be about that much a month even if you barely use it.

    5. Re:Publish the API. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's not an "API". You can get this data now from some utilities. You get a Zigbee enabled device that talks to your meter and put it in your home. Then it can display the current price for the time of day. This is all new of course because newer meters need to be rolled out before tiered pricing schemes can be implemented.

    6. Re:Publish the API. by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      and what happens on a very hot summer day when the electrcity price goes up over $3000 per Mwh (it does happen)?

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    7. Re:Publish the API. by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      In California you're protected in that the rate is already set ahead of time. The utiltiies cannot change it on a whim but must get permission from the CPUC.

      The utilites actually have a problem there as they cannot just charge more even though they may have to pay more during peak then they are selling to you for.

    8. Re:Publish the API. by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      It’s the same here for the general consumer you always pay about 19 cents per kwh for peak power (which should cover any spikes in price over a large enough time). However i think the op i was replying to was talking about taking advantage of the fluctuating wholesale electricity prices (which large consumers or generators do when they trade electricity) which means you could get some great prices .1 cents per kwh but it could also be huge (I’ve seen it over $3000 per mwh) when demand is high. So unless you have an energy storage option or a generator to run when the price sky rockets it won’t work out very well.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    9. Re:Publish the API. by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Yup, I've very aware of locate storage options out in the power distribution network.

  28. Still News??? by softWare3ngineer · · Score: 1

    How is this still news. Information about your personal habits, purchases, and movements is valuable. So companies are going to collected it and sell it. That is what companies are suppose to do. make money. I think we are being a little naive when we are surprised that this is happening. No one seems to care to follow their congressmen who create the environment for this to happen, but are mad when things don't go our way.

  29. PR Blunder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is what this whole issue boils down to: http://www.microparsec.com/comics/64.html - emotions will always override rational thinking, in either direction.

  30. When I fart by blair1q · · Score: 0, Troll

    When I fart you can tell what I had for dinner last night.

    Is this a privacy concern?

    No?

    Damn. I was going to submit it to /.

  31. Distraction from real issue by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    I feel for all those peeps out there seeing their utility bills skyrocket after these things are installed. The less baseload you use the more you pay. Since they can predict exactly what the usage will be at large scales the easier it becomes to tweak the system to extract maximum $$$.

    In terms of privacy even with the best protections on paper it is still more shit that can be used against you... A divorce attrny filing subpeonas to make the case you are a lazy bastard who constantly sleeps in or LEA on a witch hunt finding the correlation they've been looking for.

    Either way smart metering means we all loose regardless of the text of any legislation. It is sad too because in principal I like the idea of exposing real costs to the consumer.

    1. Re:Distraction from real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way smart metering means we all loose regardless of the text of any legislation. It is sad too because in principal I like the idea of exposing real costs to the consumer.

      The smart meters I've seen don't even show those costs. They record on-peak vs off-peak usage and report it (by the hour, I guess), but if you want to see what the costs are you have to call the company every day or go to their website for it.

      Turns out to be a lose/lose for the consumer. Your bill will go up unless and until you shift 80% of your usage to the off-peak hours.

      (fun thought: what happens if everyone did that?)

    2. Re:Distraction from real issue by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The bills skyrocketed for 3 reasons, as determined by the CPUC investigation. Some misconfigured meters; a change in rates; and a heat wave. So people see a meter installed and then they see a higher bill and they think the meter is the culprit. But they didn't notice that their price per kilowatt went up and that they had their AC on full blast. Then PG&E completely screwed this up with awful public relations by ignoring the complaints or blaming the customer. Even if it is technically the fault of the customer it's rotten PR to say that.

      There are 1600 meters with bugs though that are being replaced now.

    3. Re:Distraction from real issue by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      Yes, less than 0.08% of PG&E's millions of meters (8M). It's such an insignificant amount. Yes, they clearly should have handled complaints better and the PR better.

      The best thing would have been to get them in place and get customers educated and seeing their near real-time bills online (with the costs assocated with it) - before their first bill ever arrived.

  32. google power by iiii · · Score: 2

    I hear google is starting a new service where you get your electricity for free, but they get to keep all the usage data and do whatever they want with it. As a first test of the utility of this they are modeling when people are home and when they are not, then door-to-door sales organizations get to participate in an auction to buy time segments of people at home. Rumor has it that the Girl Scouts and the Jehovah's Witnesses were having a bidding war for your house at 6:45-7:15 PM next tuesday. Next they will target your computer with ads for porn when you are using the laptop after 11PM and the wife has set her alarm earlier than 7AM and turned off the upstairs lights. Other applications to follow.

    Ok, ok, i just made that up.

    --
    Light cup, beer drink, thin so chain, neck turtle fat, man I won't say it again
    1. Re:google power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comments by "I've worked for firms that collect this data" notwithstanding, the analysis is fairly trivial, and available to government agencies on demand. I've analyzed this type of data many times for "law enforcement agencies".

      NB: Big brother knows far more about you than your proctologist does...

    2. Re:google power by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 1

      Free electricity? Sign me up!!!

    3. Re:google power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you forgot, now that they know when you are home, they know when you are NOT home --- little Sally of Troop 100 just sold that information to her cousin for a cut of the what ever he gets from the pawn shop.

    4. Re:google power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Next they will target your computer with ads for porn when you are using the laptop after 11PM and the wife has set her alarm earlier than 7AM and turned off the upstairs lights

      T M I

    5. Re:google power by bgarcia · · Score: 1

      Oh, you just THINK you're making it up: http://www.google.com/powermeter

      --
      I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
    6. Re:google power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be nice to get free power. Stick a giant capacitor in the garage and the meter would read constant trickle use 24/7.

  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. ALL DATA by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Any data can be used good or bad. For example for good it could be used so we pay more during peak time and less for off hours. This would normally be good for home users as most people are out to work during peak times thus are paying less. Also a lot of this data is not really too useful, as it doesn't prove anything. Do you take a shower at 6:00 or is your thermostat on a timer and you heat rises at 6:00 so when you wake up at 7:00 your house is warm and toasty.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:ALL DATA by berashith · · Score: 1

      I think you meant that we will pay more during peak hours and the same during off hours. There is no way the utilities will use this to lower their revenues.

    2. Re:ALL DATA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also a lot of this data is not really too useful, as it doesn't prove anything. Do you take a shower at 6:00 or is your thermostat on a timer and you heat rises at 6:00 so when you wake up at 7:00 your house is warm and toasty.

      Chances are your showering habits are pretty consistent throughout the year. On the other hand, your furnace usage will vary throughout the year and have a correspondence with outside temperature. Over time, it becomes easier and easier to figure out what is what. In the winter, most furnaces will end up running in a pretty consistent pattern. They spike to a certain power consumption for a couple of minutes while the furnace gets prepped, then it spikes higher when the blower turns on, it runs at that level for a certain number of minutes, shuts down for a certain number of minutes, and then repeats the cycle. Once you know the spike pattern and magnitudes, you can detect it no matter how often it runs. It doesn't even matter if other spikes from other appliances overlap it.

  35. It's not just gas and electric meters by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

    They have smart water meters, too.

    It's a double-edged sword. Sure... if they cared, they could use it to determine when you were in the shower. But then again, they can also detect that your toilet is leaking ~1gpm and notify you before you get your next bill and discover that you were billed for using 40,000 gallons of water that month.

    1. Re:It's not just gas and electric meters by Surt · · Score: 1

      1 gpm is a really fast leak. You would almost certainly notice that (assuming you were home). And the $60 it would cost you, while significant, is also not a killer for most people's budgets, at least not people who leave home for long enough for this to matter, and who have both smart meters and a way to get informed of a leak.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:It's not just gas and electric meters by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Not if it's leaking into the toilet tank. It would just run down the drain. Unless you notice that the noise of running water never entirely stops when it fills, but a lot of people wouldn't notice something like that. Anyway I was just throwing out a number; if the water use doesn't drop to zero at some point in the night you can pretty safely assume that there's a leak. It doesn't have to be a lot of water.

      Also, where do you live that 40,000 gallons of water costs $60? That seems low. I suggest you check your bill; it's probably higher.

      Regardless, a lot of people's monthly budgets would take a pretty bad hit over an unexpected $60 extra.

    3. Re:It's not just gas and electric meters by makomk · · Score: 1

      Wait, you don't have a law that requires toilet tank overflows to be installed in a visible location, they can just feed straight back down the drain? That's bizarre.

    4. Re:It's not just gas and electric meters by Arlet · · Score: 1

      My toilet water tank is built into the wall, which is pretty common around here.

      However, it is very unlikely to cause significant spilling without making a noticeable sound.

    5. Re:It's not just gas and electric meters by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      Wait, you don't have a law that requires toilet tank overflows to be installed in a visible location, they can just feed straight back down the drain?

      Are we talking about the same thing?

      Diagram

      When the toilet is flushed, the flush valve opens and the bowl is rapidly filled. Once the water level in the bowl reaches above the top of the trap (the goose-neck in the drain - not labeled), it creates a siphon which drains the bowl. Once the tank is almost empty, the flush valve snaps closed and the tank refills.

      However, if the flush valve doesn't close properly and leaks, the bowl constantly fills, but too slowly to fill the trap with water completely. So rather than siphoning the bowl empty, it just constantly overflows into the drain. Meanwhile the tank gradually drains and when the level is low enough the float opens the filler valve and it refills. The only thing you'd be able to notice is the sound of the water coming on periodically to refill the tank.

    6. Re:It's not just gas and electric meters by filthpickle · · Score: 1

      I knew someone in the military that was getting ready to leave for another assignment for several months. The last thing he did before he left his house was take a leak. The flapper didn't seal and the toilet ran for about 2 months. I don't remember what the bill was, but it was astronomical. I'm pretty sure the water co. worked with him on it though.

  36. But, but... by mangu · · Score: 1

    These are what keep us SAFE because it lets power companies notify law enforcement when our neighbors are growing marijuana! We NEED these to keep us SAFE!

    I grow marijuana, you insensitive clod!

  37. telemarketers by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    Telemarketers use this so they can call you just as you get out of the shower.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  38. What? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    Smart metering should reduce power costs and consumption, not increase it. With the current system, most of the electricity we produce is simply wasted. If the public utility has more information about usage patterns, it should be able to conserve more energy.

    1. Re:What? by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Smart metering should reduce power costs and consumption, not increase it.

      Welcome to the exponential part of the population growth curve, where it doesn't matter what you do, there are no longer enough resources to go around.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:What? by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 2

      There are more than enough resources to go around. It simply isn't economical to go after most of them right now, but it will become so.

    3. Re:What? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Ontario(Cdn) went to smart meters. People curbed back power usage. Businesses left. There is a glut of power now. OPG(ontaro power generation) applied for and got a 5-10% increase based on less consumer demand to offset less usage.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:What? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      There is a glut of power now. OPG(ontaro power generation) applied for and got a 5-10% increase based on less consumer demand to offset less usage.

      Now, that is depressing -- everyone pays more because they asked us to use less, and now they need to offset that.

      That, and the fact that in Ontario only a small part of your bill is related to consumption ... you've got your debt retirement fees, your service fees, your executive-hooker-and-bonus fees, the because-we-said-so fees.

      Same goes for natural gas.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    5. Re:What? by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      I don't get it.

      Do you mean some future inventor will save us all with a brilliant new technogadget?

      Or do you mean that when we have a population density of 136.7 people per square meter it will be cheap to desalinate the ocean?

      Or do you mean we should wait until wars and natural disasters wipe out all the poor people, and the survivors will then have enough to go around?

    6. Re:What? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the exponential part of the population growth curve, where it doesn't matter what you do, there are no longer enough resources to go around.

      When there's a shortage, it means the price is too low. So when "there are no longer enough resources to go around", the solution should be obvious.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    7. Re:What? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Aha. Perhaps in a country that isn't a democracy.

      Unfortunately, in the US we have environmental groups that are convinced that building one more power plant will be the thing that pushes everything over the "tipping point" and the environment will crash in some spectacular way. Perhaps the oceans will boil, the whales return to the land and devour all non-whale life on the planet. Or something like that.

      Anyway, there have been very few large-scale power plants built since around 1970 or so. Sure, a bunch have been started but they have not been finished. So we have been existing for the last 40 years on a tendancy to overbuild that existed 1900-1969. Very fortunately that we had that tendancy if I say so. The result is that no amount of conservation is going to help and we will start seeing electricity rationing in the near future. It is now too late to build - it would take five years for a coal plant to come online and more like ten years for a nuclear plant and we simply do not have that much time left.

      I suppose a reasonable paraphrasing might be "The way for someone to really conserve electricity is to be dead, and if you aren't careful you are going to be conserving soon."

    8. Re:What? by RoFLKOPTr · · Score: 1

      Smart metering should reduce power costs and consumption, not increase it. With the current system, most of the electricity we produce is simply wasted. If the public utility has more information about usage patterns, it should be able to conserve more energy.

      That's not true. The utilities know how much power is being used at any given time based on the draw from their sources. Electricity is traded on an open market. In California, that market is managed by the California Independent System Operator. Electricity is being bought and sold in real-time so the utilities can get the lowest price and the sources can get the highest. Prices change literally every millisecond and as more demand is placed on a given source, the price of power from that source goes up, triggering power to be bought from a lower-priced source. That source knows who and where is buying how much power from them and they balance their generation capacity to match it. It's a very efficient system.

      On an anecdotal note, my father is a superintendent for the electrical contractor that just finished building the new California ISO headquarters. That place is huge, secure, has massive datacenters and control rooms, and has power and telecom redundancy like you wouldn't believe. It's really neat.

    9. Re:What? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      It is now too late to build - it would take five years for a coal plant to come online and more like ten years for a nuclear plant and we simply do not have that much time left.

      Wouldn't pricing electricity at the market clearing rate buy us enough time to put another power plant on line?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    10. Re:What? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      Finally someone that gets it! All problems are caused by mouth breathing Environmentalist groups who have the utter and complete downfall of the civilized world as their goal. Supported by liberal think tanks who are funded by anarchists, they inch ever closer to their goal of a total destruction of civilization.

      Let's avoid the strawman argument

      Anyhow, while it is convenient to blame everything on environmentalist strawmen, a more plausible explanation might be that like all infrastructure issues, there just isn't much profit or glamor in building new large scale plants. And environmentalist challenges are only one small part of the cost. The system is set up for easy pickin's these days. Want to build a power plant or speculate on oil prices? Speculation will win every time. You don't actually have to do anything. Fix bridges? What the hell? To make any money from that, you have to create an engineering company which then has to get money form a very small pool. Ahh to hell with that.

      There are some examples of new power generation that are happening. Take wind power. In our area the things are sprouting up like daisies on steroids. And there has been some environmental group pushback. That some people disagree with you is no excuse for folding the tents. The people who want to put up the wind towers have not just a desire to make money, but a sort of excitement and purpose to what they are doing. They withstood the challenges, and are doing their work. We're starting to generate more power from wind. This isn't an argument about total power production, it's about how people have made more power infrastructure in spite of other's concerns.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:What? by idlehanz · · Score: 1

      It actually takes about 15 years for a coal plant to come online from the time a certificate of need is filed (a journey of a thousand miles begins once the paperwork is completed) to when it is actually fired up. It takes about 5 years just to do the paperwork, filings, testimony before a state public utility commission, etc., etc.

      --
      Changing the world... one research project at a time.
  39. Infrared imaging of homes ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    How did they get that evidence without a court order? Getting the court order for the data from the electric company should require some other evidence right?

    Some police agencies have tried overflying neighborhoods and noting infrared hot spots. A home that is pumping out "too much" heat may be the tip off. Note that warrants do not require the same burden of proof as conviction at trial, warrants only need "reasonable" cause.

    Like odors, IR leaking into the public domain needs no warrant.

    1. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by nabsltd · · Score: 1

      Note that warrants do not require the same burden of proof as conviction at trial, warrants only need "reasonable" cause.

      But any judge with half a brain should require more than just "reasonable cause" to approve a no-knock warrant.

      OK, so I see the fallacy in my own statement...sorry to take up your time.

    2. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

      Note that warrants do not require the same burden of proof as conviction at trial, warrants only need "reasonable" cause.

      But any judge with half a brain should require more than just "reasonable cause" to approve a no-knock warrant. OK, so I see the fallacy in my own statement...sorry to take up your time.

      Humor aside you make a good point. I doubt these warrants based solely on IR output or electricity consumption are no-knocks executed by a swat team. I'd expect that judges generally require that the renter/owner have an appropriate criminal record.

      So when my beowulf cluster of C64s comes to the attention of the police I expect a detective to knock on my door and ask whats up with all the electricity. After I show him the beowulf cluster I expect he will say little more than "so what WoW realm do you play on?".

    3. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Like odors, IR leaking into the public domain needs no warrant."

      Nope. An infrared scan constitutes a search. They would have to get a warrant, first, in order to do the thermal imaging.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States

    4. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by DarkVader · · Score: 2

      I don't know why you would expect that.

      These are drug warrants we're talking about. The cops like to use their fancy SWAT toys, and they love no-knock warrants.

      You're not going to get a polite detective knocking, you're going to get 20 cops breaking down your door at 3 am, trashing your house and your beowulf cluster looking for your grow operation.

    5. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by SeximusMaximus · · Score: 1

      How did they get that evidence without a court order? Getting the court order for the data from the electric company should require some other evidence right?

      Some police agencies have tried overflying neighborhoods and noting infrared hot spots. A home that is pumping out "too much" heat may be the tip off. Note that warrants do not require the same burden of proof as conviction at trial, warrants only need "reasonable" cause. Like odors, IR leaking into the public domain needs no warrant.

      Maybe you are not in the United States, but that type of "through the wall" sensing would be considered a search here - even written by numb nuts Scalia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States

    6. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by BBTaeKwonDo · · Score: 1
    7. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trashing your house and your beowulf cluster looking for your grow operation.

      Those were obviously very fancy grow light timers.

    8. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but they will get Google to send Street IR View vans down the streets and then they can just search the whole town by target temperature.

    9. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Problem is, what if the house contains a meth lab? If you knock on the door and say "Police" the response is to immediately (a) fire off many weapons and (b) detonate any possible meth-making supplies to destroy the evidence (and a good portion of the block as well).

      Any warrant being served on a house needs to take that into consideration. If the people in the house are just using meth then (b) from above does not apply, but (a) does - and the people are likely paranoid enough to do (a) to the limit of their ability when the person knocking on the door says "Avon calling" instead of "Police" because it might be the police lying about who they are.

      You have to understand the psychology of meth, meth users and meth makers. In many parts of the country meth has completely taken over.

    10. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      What possible justification could there be? It's not like you can flush a marijuana factory down the toilet. Just surround the place to prevent the people inside from running away.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Infrared imaging of homes ... by ep32g79 · · Score: 1

      Whats wrong with the stakeout, waiting and watching until they leave the house and you nab them on the sidewalk. Or is this not exciting enough for the C.O.P.S generation?

  40. but the benefits! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    outweigh the privacy invasion.

  41. oxymoron by Surt · · Score: 1

    Privacy invasion on a massive scale. Hilarious.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  42. Nothing to hide, nothing to worry about by travdaddy · · Score: 1

    see subject

    --
    Adidas To Bring Back Sneakernet
  43. No, It Can't by lazarus · · Score: 1

    "If you have a 'smart meter' it is collecting data that can reveal when you wake up, when you leave for work and come home, when you go on vacation and when you take a shower" No, my "smart" meter has been combined with TOU (Time of Use) billing, so naturally I installed 7 day programmable timers on everything. My ground source heat pump only comes on at night and brings the temperature up on my radiant floor heating system. My AC only comes on and cools the house when it is cheap to do so. My hot water tank heats up at night and provides me with enough hot water for the day. My dishwasher comes on in the middle of the night as well. If they are gleaning any statistics from watching my energy usage, they might as well be using the slashdot poll results as well.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
  44. Re:Let us not forget power factor by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    Incandecent lighting has a power factor of 1. Electric motors have a pf of quite a bit less than 1. Florescent bulbs have really shitty power profiles. This goes on top of the overall power consumptions of devices. I've seen the same thing done with just a precision current measurement on a car - door opens, key goes in, engine cranks, door closes, radio goes on, etc....

    The thing people keep failing to point out is that there is NO benefit to the customer or the utility for collecting this data. Because they have the data and the customer causes the usage, there is no way to affect usage as a result of this data collection. So called smart appliances that can use less power during peak are a nice thought, but if they make rates adjustable and broadcast them people will go after the savings themselves without sharing data. Oh wait, but they want to smooth the load (turn off my fridge) independent of the rates...

  45. Are you kidding me!? by flahwho · · Score: 1

    I work for Gas and Electric municipalities all over the country. Smart meters are designed to transmit usage data and never have I heard of ANY PUC (Public Utilities Commision) or even Private or co-op Municipalities collecting data other than for billing or diagnostic purposes. I work DIRECTLY with data collection and billing accuracies for Gas Meters and have NEVER seen ANYTHING to indicate this is going on.. As a matter of fact I would think that it would be illegal if they sold any of that information. Fucking paranoids... It's not even happening anyway! Really!?

    1. Re:Are you kidding me!? by PPH · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a investor-owned electric utility. Long before 'smart meters' they had a practice of running a query on residential customer billing records to find patterns of unusual use. These were turned over to law enforcement as potential pot growing operations. To top it off, they occasionally loan the cops a meter readers uniform so they could sneak up on houses and peek in windows.

      I was a distribution engineer for this outfit. When this behavior hit the news, I was concerned that the next time I went out to look at a sagging service line, I'd get shot by some stoner thinking I would rat them out. I don't give a sh*t what people were growing in their barn or greenhouse. That's not my job.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  46. yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read through some comments... ordinarily when some company collects data on people you can count on the slashdot romper room to go apoplectic.

    but this is 'smart' meters... the power company could collect, analyze and sell this data to professional home invaders and the greenies around here wouldn't bat an eye.

  47. Re:Make Money by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    That is what companies are suppose to do. make money.

    I've often thought that is a stupid argument. If a company wants to make money, just sell all the assets and start a hedge fund. Got it? OK, now that we understand that a company exists to participate in some specific part(s) of the economy we can ask how other activities fit into that business model.

    I usually use this argument to ask why a company doesn't want to innovate or strive to be among the best in its industry. The ones that are more focused on the dollars than the business don't last.

  48. Who thinks this is valuable? by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Does the Electric Company not already have a technology-sharing agreement with the underwear gnomes?

  49. smart meter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to get into the boggy man issue, in the future the smart meter will have the ability to communicate with newer appliances one example would be if you own an electric car it will see the car in the household grid and sell that charging session at a lower kwh price.

  50. Electricity is voluntary too. by Comboman · · Score: 1

    Electricity is voluntary too. Get yourself some solar cells and a battery bank and you can use electricity anonymously and not worry about Big Brother knowing what time you take your shower.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  51. Vlad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reza?

  52. I work for a smart meter manufacturer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and believe me, the meters are smart, but not that smart.

  53. start up is using the data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time for solar and batteries?
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-20061749-54.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=GreenTech

  54. "Is Your Electricity Meter Spying On You?" by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Yes! They're tracking my usage! They'll use that data to bill me for every kwhr I use over my cap! There ought to be a law!

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  55. Oh My God Who Cares!!! by spiedrazer · · Score: 1

    I'm all for protecting real privacy, but worrying about this is just a huge waste of time and resources. People need to get a grip!

    --
    Keep passing the open windows...
  56. You all asked for it! by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    Well, you and all the other so-called environmentalists.

    So now you have it, and it's going to get worse when all of your appliances are "smart". You're home alone watching television in your living room and the power company notices that you left the kitchen light on. Busted!

  57. burglary potential by glebovitz · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I had an entirely different read on this law. I don't want anyone in the Electric Company / Gas Company figuring out when I am away from home. If an employee can discover when power usage drops for a few days from normal routine, they can sell this information to house thieves.

    1. Re:burglary potential by Arlet · · Score: 1

      I'd be more worried anyone at my credit card company selling my info to credit card thieves. Or perhaps my car dealer selling copies of my keyfob to car thieves, or my travel agent selling my travel data to house thieves, or my ISP selling my passwords to on-line thieves, or my phone company selling all my location data and call details, or my doctor selling my medical records.... etc... etc...

  58. AC offers an interesting read ... by perpenso · · Score: 1

    "Like odors, IR leaking into the public domain needs no warrant."

    Nope. An infrared scan constitutes a search. They would have to get a warrant, first, in order to do the thermal imaging.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyllo_v._United_States

    Wow, that was a surprising read in more than one way. Thanks AC.

  59. In Soviet America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... meter reads YOU!

    Come on! That was too easy!

  60. Data mining? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They might not know now but with a little data mining they could figure it out. Either that or they sell the data to someone who does data mining.

  61. Not just YOUR privacy by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I post on Facebook what I choose to post. Therefore, Facebook posts are not a privacy violation...

    Unless you choose to post something about ME without my permission. What? You thought your feelings on what is private are the only ones that matter? Your postings can affect other peoples privacy too so it isn't just as simple as what you think. I really don't want to have to police your postings to ensure my privacy.

    Yes, stupid people will post stupid things that allow others to invade their privacy, but you can't legislate away stupidity.

    In the case of Facebook you absolutely can legislate away stupidity by shutting Facebook down. A terrible solution but it would work.

    By contrast, I don't choose what information my water meter collects.

    Sure you do. You decide when to turn the water on and off.

    Disclosure of private information should require explicit consent.

    So when are you going to get my consent to post a picture of me on Facebook?

    1. Re:Not just YOUR privacy by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      What? You thought your feelings on what is private are the only ones that matter?

      No, that's just not a relevant data point. If you tell something private about me, there's not a thing I can do about that, whether you do it on Facebook, on your own website, by telling the neighborhood gossip, etc. Ultimately, that's not a privacy flaw in Facebook, but rather a flaw in my friends. Facebook isn't violating my privacy; my friends are.

      More to the point, there's no reasonable way for Facebook to police everyone's posts for every single thing that they might say about me that I might consider a privacy violation.

      Comparing that to water meters is absurd. The power company is collecting the information from me, not from my neighbor. It's more like the power company doing a poll and my neighbors mentioning that they should do repair work between [insert hours here] because I'm not home. If my neighbors were stupid enough to say that, the power company isn't obligated to keep those survey results secret, particularly if they posted that along with a hundred thousand other people's comments.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  62. Insufficient resolution by aegl · · Score: 1
    My smart gas meter produces one data point per day in units of whole therms. Usage for the last few days looks like this:

    1, 2, 3, 1, 1, 2, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3

    Good luck doing the data analysis on that to tell what time I take a shower.

    If I had a smart meter for electricity (I don't, PG&E won't give me one because I have solar panels on my roof) there might be more of a problem as I understand that these provide per-hour data - not sure of the resolution. I'm certain that you'd be able to tell when I run the clothes drier - but smaller appliances are going to be difficult to spot in hourly data.

    1. Re:Insufficient resolution by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      The bill they give you might give units in whole therms, but I seriously doubt that their meter is that imprecise.

    2. Re:Insufficient resolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but generally people shower more then just on Tuesdays and Wednesdays.

    3. Re:Insufficient resolution by jroysdon · · Score: 1

      They are battery powered. There is no need to keep more accurate information than daily usage for gas as you only need up to the day information. The less work and more idle the meter is, the less power it will use and the less often the battery must be replaced.

    4. Re:Insufficient resolution by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      I said precision, not accuracy. They may round the units for the billing but I'm sure the meter submits a decimal with a fair amount of precision. And how often it submits a read is fairly irrelevant since if they want a more accurate profile of your energy use, all they have to do is reprogram your meter to submit more reads. The smart water meters where I live are programmed to submit 4 reads every day, but if a more fine resolution is desired on any one meter it can be reprogrammed to submit up to one read every 15 minutes.

  63. Aggregated data can reveal a lot by sjbe · · Score: 1

    They record your energy usage at set intervals, which data can then be used to *guess* how you may be using it.

    A statistically significant collection of guesses frequently turns out to be remarkable accurate way to measure behavior.

  64. I lived alone, my mind was blank... by turing_m · · Score: 1

    I think as long as you play the Iron Maiden loudly enough your neighbours can hear, you should be fine. Pink Floyd and Phish, not so much.

    --
    If I have seen further it is by stealing the Intellectual Property of giants.
    1. Re:I lived alone, my mind was blank... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 1

      I think as long as you play the Iron Maiden loudly enough your neighbours can hear, you should be fine. Pink Floyd and Phish, not so much.

      LoL, yep, but that worked too well... noise complaints and all.

  65. Marticock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get back in your crib!

  66. USA spy everywhere by luk3Z · · Score: 0

    USA is most spying country on the world. It's yours pseudo-democracy country...

    --
    Recipes for USA bankrupt - http://tinypaste.com/0d66f dd = dollar deluge (printed in the infinity)
  67. Give it five years by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    until they roll out the monitoring of what is going down your sewer pipe. Both insurance corporations and the morality police would kill for such information and they would literally wade through shit to get it.

  68. Overreacting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember folks, we don't actually have a right to privacy at all... Read the constitution.

    As for the pot plant busts, a marijuana farm of that size requires a constant stream of energy. No appliance in the home does so on that scale. The closest would be an alarm clock. Refrigerators and a/c units cycle on/off, creating a rythm, whereas heat lamps produce a flatter power curve.

    Quite frankly, if someone wants the information, it can be gotten. Most of it legally and quite easily. Things like our driver's license number, workplace, address, phone number, etc are all public domain. Ask anyone who is a private investigator and you'll be surprised what info is out there.

    The new meters will allow the electric co. to map power use, allowing them to estimate when the highest and lowest demands are, tailoring generation to meet those needs. And of course, allowing them to charge us more for their installation, forgetting to remember that they no longer have to pay meter readers. I personally hope that we have access to our own power map. It would allow me to decide just how viable an alternative such as solar or hydrogen would be for my household.