Slashdot Mirror


GameStop Opening Deus Ex Boxes, Removing Free Game Coupon

DisKurzion writes "A leaked GameStop memo indicates that employees are to open the regular PC release of Deus Ex: Human Revolution and discard the included OnLive coupon. From the article: 'GameStop spokesperson Beth Sharum confirmed the practice, telling Ars that "Square Enix packed the competitor's coupon with our DXHR product without our prior knowledge and we did pull these coupons.'"

343 comments

  1. Tampering by CSFFlame · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this tampering with a new product?

    1. Re:Tampering by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh you can bet this will be quite actionable unless there is a contract agreement to the contrary.

    2. Re:Tampering by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By reasonable standards, yes, but Gamestop used to sell used games as new. This is basically a monopoly that abuses their customers. And their customers are largely under 18 year olds with more disposable income than experience or common sense, so they keep shopping there.

    3. Re:Tampering by Tharsman · · Score: 2

      Indeed. There are two potential outcomes of this.

      A: class action lawsuit.
      B: If the game includes a game key to install, OnLive will work with SquareEnix to recognize that number as a valid cupon number.

      Hopefully they approach option B. I rather users actually get what they paid for than lawyers dip in a huge percentage of a class action suit's settlement.

      I have to say, I have test-played OnLive, and the system is amazing. Only reason I have not bought a single game from them is I like to own a copy I can play offline. If they started offering a steam-like distribution, where I can download a copy on top of the one I stream, or include coupons like these in game boxes, I'd jump all over their service in a heartbeat.

      The saddest thing is GameStop's actions have resulted in increased promotion to the coupon. I had no clue about this and likely would had never found out without this coverage. Now I do plan to go buy the game (that i was not going to buy due to my PC not being able to run it smoothly) at BestBuy and activate that coupon to play from my underpowered PC :D

    4. Re:Tampering by morari · · Score: 2

      Used to? They still do. The last time I went in there was to buy the last Wolfenstein (2009). The very day it came out, yet they someone only had the display copy for PC. The box was on display, the game was shoved in a paper envelope and filed away in a drawer. They expected me to pay full price for an opened product. I walked across the parking lot and got it from Wal-Mart instead, where they had dozens sitting on the shelf. I didn't have to put up with any sales pitches over frequent shopper cards or subscriptions to lame-ass magazines either.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    5. Re:Tampering by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Isn't this tampering with a new product?

      It's false advertising if they state it's a new product / sealed in box, without informing that it is an "open box" product.

      Fortunately for GS; the product is not a food item or medication, so there is no risk that their tampering causes bodily injury or death.. if it were, and they broke the seal on the package before purchase, it would be a federal crime called Tampering with a consumer product.

    6. Re:Tampering by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      No, because in their agreements, they absolutely have the right to open product to inspect it written down.

      This is true for almost any major retail agreement, and this is why every retail shop has a shrink wrapper machine in the back.

    7. Re:Tampering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Monopoly"? Seriously, there's no other way to buy games in your neck of the woods?

      Dude, get an internet connection.

    8. Re:Tampering by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realise that the reason why these rules exist is because products you mention are PERISHABLES? As in they can become fatal when opened in wrong environment, and are sealed to increase their due date.
      Medicines are also often controlled substances.

      You can be absolutely certain that any product that doesn't fall in that category (or similar category where opening product may cause significant harm to the product itself) can, and often will be opened by retailer if there is a suspicion of something being wrong with package. They absolutely have this right, both legally and contractually with their supplier. You have to be utterly ignorant of how retail works (and why it works the way it does) to claim otherwise.

      And no, removing coupons that were put against retailers' desire, and possibly agreements does not fall into this category. And even if they remove the coupons, the game itself is completely unused, and therefore new.

      The only thing they may be doing wrong is false advertisement if package includes mention of the coupon, and retailer doesn't specifically mention the lack of this coupon before sale is made.

    9. Re:Tampering by interkin3tic · · Score: 2

      I didn't have to put up with any sales pitches over frequent shopper cards or subscriptions to lame-ass magazines either.

      I wish there was a code word or short phrase for "I don't mean to be rude, and I know you are required by your employer to ask, but stop trying to upsell me or get me to sign up for stuff." When I was working there, I'd prefer it when people would just ignore my greeting, which was supposed to be followed up with an annoying sales pitch. I'm not sure others would agree though.

    10. Re:Tampering by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Trading video games is what they have a monopoly on, in terms of stores. You can buy videogames everywhere, yes, but gamestop makes only a small fraction of their revenue off of selling new games. That's basically just to get you to come into the store.

      Anyway, a store and a website are not the same thing, especially not to their customer base (I buy most of my games online, I'm not representative of their customers.)

    11. Re:Tampering by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      That is why I just tell everyone to just go to Amazon. Within days of a game coming out there are already used copies at BETTER prices that gameslop and it is the only place i know of where one can buy new and used PC games uber-cheap as well.

      Most of the guys here would think I'm nuts but I enjoy BAD games, i'm not talking bad to the bone, i'm talking MST3K making fun of it bad and Amazon is wonderful for getting truly awful games for dirt cheap. if anyone hasn't tried them the digital spray games like "You are empty" fits this category, it is like "The Ring" if written by a seriously stoned Russian. And who can bitch when you get games for $3 or $4 shipped? hell at those prices i bought Kane & Lynch II just to laugh at it. BTW do NOT buy K&L II, it is so bad it ain't even funny bad, just painful bad. Duke Nukem Forever is actually better, it is THAT bad. you can be 4 foot away from someone and NEVER hit them!

      So if Gameslop is acting like douches I'm frankly not surprised. The only reason I'm glad they exist is the game companies want to yank first sale away from us and make us pay them for the right to sell our used games, so it is like "battle of the network douchebags" when it comes to the publishers and gameslop. Just stick to Amazon and all will be gravy. The only thing GS is good for is dumping unwanted games and even then I tell folks they'd be better off at a pawnshop for the ripoff prices GS gives for used games.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    12. Re:Tampering by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      Which is why my old and experienced ass, gets my games from private servers.

    13. Re:Tampering by RsG · · Score: 1

      There's very little economic reason to trade in used games at Gamestop. The value you get from them is minimal; you'd have to get rid of a whole stack of games (games that are still recent enough and saleable titles for the store to want them, mind you) in order to get one in exchange. I'm quite sure the only reason the practice persists is because Gamestop has done such an excellent job of convincing people otherwise.

      If you remove trade-ins from the equation, what does Gamestop really offer, or have a monopoly on? They're an upscale, specialized pawnshop that sells new games on the side.

      I'm not saying it isn't an effective business model on their part mind you, just that their business model is a half and half mixture of good marketing and a target audience who's bad at arithmetic.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    14. Re:Tampering by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just start answering in Latvian. If they appear to understand then use medieval French. If they still understand you, they are clearly overqualified for the job.

    15. Re:Tampering by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      The settlement will be a free coupon for their online version, plus a few dozen million for the lawyers. At least the money is discouragement to them doing the same thing again, but don't expect anyone else to get more than what was taken from the game box to begin with.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    16. Re:Tampering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems simple to me, if the coupon is not in the package then return it to the store as a defective product (i.e. parts of the product, as listed on the box, are missing).

    17. Re:Tampering by conspirator57 · · Score: 1

      l2auction.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    18. Re:Tampering by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I believe it's caused by games becoming too damn disposable, you beat them once and have no desire to ever play them again. At that point it would be pot attachment to NOT sell the game off.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    19. Re:Tampering by delinear · · Score: 1

      I avoid Game (pretty much the same thing in the UK) whenever possible for much the same reason. I had the misfortune of having to shop there a couple of weeks ago (the other half wanted a Kinect and they were running a pretty good bundle deal) and it occurred to me: instead of a loyalty card that customers have to pay £3 per year for, how about some marketing spiel opt out. I wouldn't mind paying £3 for some kind of annual badge that I can flash that basically says just put the goddamn game in the bag and ring it up, I don't want insurance, I don't want to know about the trade in system, I'm not interested in buying anything else (if I was I would have brought it to the counter at the same time), I don't have nor do I want a loyalty card, I don't want news on upcoming games or console releases and I don't want to attend your gaming convention - yes, these were all actually questions I had to field before they deigned to let me spend £130+ with them.

    20. Re:Tampering by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      I don't think you're nuts. I like exactly the same kind of thing. But then I also love awful movies and MST3K :)

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    21. Re:Tampering by Kjella · · Score: 1

      If you know Latvian and medieval French, you're clearly too smart to shop there.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    22. Re:Tampering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, your old and experienced ass has no experience with proper use of commas.

    23. Re:Tampering by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Part of the other problem is that they've run every other trade-in place out of business.

      Trading in to Half-Price Books, I get even less back in value than I would at Gamestop.

      There used to be two other independent trade-in/used stores near me, but they both closed down after Gamestop dropped a store across the fucking street from them and began running "just in our store, buy 2 get 1 free" sales every other week till they were run out of business. It's illegal to do that, but how are single-store operators ever going to manage to lawyer up to fight the 900lb gorilla, and what would they get out of it even if they won?

      I tried selling off a "full pack" (2 turntables plus game) of DJ Hero 2 that one of my relatives had given me for my birthday on Craigslist. This was 2 weeks after it came out. Bundle retail was $150, I offered it up for $100. Got one response back which was some dumbshit who said "giv u 20 bux 4 it." Trying to sell your used games on eBay is similarly inane unless you're some shop that does nothing but sell crap on eBay all day long.

      So what's left? Well, basically I wait till Gamestop has one of those deals where they have an extra $x in credit for turning in a few games at once. Then I pile up the ones I've decided I don't want to save, and off they go.

    24. Re:Tampering by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Funny. I test-played OnLive and the service was absolute shit. Horrible lag, jitter, and an inability to run consistently without crashing. I wouldn't try them again unless you paid me enough to buy a second Xbox360 to put upstairs.

      The fact that you claim their piece of shit, single-controller, buggy as hell setup is "amazing" tells me you're a shill.

    25. Re:Tampering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realise that the reason why these rules exist is because products you mention are PERISHABLES?

      You do realise that mysidia made that distinction right? Also, I do not appreciate people shouting the word perishables at me, or anyone else.

    26. Re:Tampering by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      The fact that you jump to conclusions like that tell me you are clueless about technology.

      For one, their service performance can be heavily affected by your geographical location and your ISP.

      Also, you can access it from computers where you use it with the keyboard, not "a single controller".

      Also would be usefull to know when you tested it. Before release in a qiosq with their setup box and controller? At your home 2 months after release? Last week?

      What games did you test?

      I think it goes without saying if the service was as bad for everyone as you describe, they would had gone bankrupt already.

    27. Re:Tampering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, they go get a Job as at Starbucks?

    28. Re:Tampering by ChristopherBurg · · Score: 1

      Best Buy now buys and sells used games and many pawn shops have been buying and selling used games since the old NES days (probably earlier).

    29. Re:Tampering by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it would have to be on the package. If Square's website said "Every copy includes a free coupon" and it wasn't there, then someone could reasonably take Square to task for that. And if it was GS' policies that caused it to be untrue, then Square could quite reasonably have their lawyers pass that grief straight on back to GS. Of course, the most likely thing to happen is that someone would complain about the lack of a coupon to Square, and Square will post them a form letter apology and a coupon, at which point trying to drag it into court becomes dodgy at best.

    30. Re:Tampering by muindaur · · Score: 1

      This is the reason I just don't bother ever setting foot in one. Even their used games are too pricy.

      We'll give you crap for a game we'll resell for $50!

      Yeah....

      That's not gonna happen. Due to living out in the country, with not caring about having it at release, I just order from Amazon. Forty minute drives to the nearest store for anything other than food isn't really worth it for one or two items that ship for about the same travel cost (less after the gas tax hike most likely).

      As for games, I sold a used copy of Resident Evil on eBay for $25, and didn't pay much more than that to get it used online. So it's easy to get around if you know the method to cheap shipping (yellow envelopes with bubble wrap built in.)

    31. Re:Tampering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er ... that's exactly what the post you're replying to also states.

    32. Re:Tampering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the words are 'no thank you' and hold up your hand. Many will stop mid sales pitch...

    33. Re:Tampering by shentino · · Score: 1

      It's not merely tampering.

      It's outright fraud. Gamestop is representing something as an original product straight from the squeenix factory when it is not.

      Also, what would happen if due to Gamestop's meddling, squeenix got accused of false advertising for promising something in the package that one of their retailers downstream decided to extract? If these products are being sold as new then Squeenix could get blamed for it.

      Someone needs to go to jail for this, and if I were squeenix, I would sue gamestop.

    34. Re:Tampering by mark-t · · Score: 1

      If they don't want to sell the product with those coupons, that is their right, of course, but if they were supposed to be bundled with the product, the retailer should have returned the boxes to their supplier, the presence of those coupons being cited as a reason.

    35. Re:Tampering by shentino · · Score: 1

      That code word is called walking to walmart and voting with your wallet.

    36. Re:Tampering by shentino · · Score: 1

      How about:

      C: Gamestop gets prosecuted for fraud for misrepresenting tampered games as new.

    37. Re:Tampering by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      As fun as that would be, unfortunately it wont be over this. They announced they will return the money to anyone that has a valid receipt and feels wronged over this.

    38. Re:Tampering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They still sell used games as new. Bought DKC for Wii last month and it was unsealed. I would have said "fuck off" but some asshat actually bought me a gift card for the place and there was nothing better I could do with it at the time, and I wanted to get rid of it as quickly as possible to stop them from accruing any interest.

    39. Re:Tampering by Rizimar · · Score: 1

      Es nesaprotu. Kur ir Portal 2? Paldies!

    40. Re:Tampering by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Dude buy the digital spray games, especially "you are empty". It'll run on any old P4 with a 6200 or better so no problems there and it is so fucking weird it is worth every cent!

      Picture a Soviet town where everyone is supposedly gone insane where you suddenly have rednecks in coonskin caps running around with double barrels going "Bogga booga" I swear, the sound they make sounds like booga booga. And the cut scenes! Oh man the cut scenes are like if "the ring" was done by REALLY stoned Russians. "A kid walks down the street, a puppy bashes its head against a window until it bleeds, a guy gets hit by a car" WTF? What does that have to do with Soviet mind control?

      Dude get it, if you like to laugh at MST3K style WTF situations you'll love this. The entire game is completely batshit.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    41. Re:Tampering by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      You've got two more questions before I cancel this purchase.

      At third useless question, say "Purchase cancelled", take your money, return the box.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    42. Re:Tampering by djnforce9 · · Score: 1

      Some people have either no concept of how much certain things are worth and/or they try and get as low price of a price off of you that they think they can get away with. This doesn't just apply to games though but anything. Best not to give in even if you ever start feeling desperate to sell the thing.

    43. Re:Tampering by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      You know theft is not a bad word to describe this situation. It like if a retail store that sell desktop case opened all their box to steal the extra sata cables some case maker include just to say thank for doing business with me. If am Square Enix am calling my army of lawyers to bring the wrath of Satan (Lawyers) on top of these crook. And if am Onlive am calling the DOJ. The industry as a whole need to condemn this kind of practice.

    44. Re:Tampering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PERISHABLES, PERISHABLES, PERISHABLES nah-nyeh PERISHABLES!

      (here is some non-cap text so the filter will let me post this)

  2. You've got to be kidding... by RogueyWon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So... let me get this right.

    If you're competing against a fast-growing distribution method that has the potential to completely under-cut your own business model, the best way to do that is to... engage in behaviour that will really piss a good portion of your customers off?

    It's not actually the removal of the coupons that bugs me - it's the opening of the game boxes. I know that some retailers do this a lot - fortunately, it's rarer here in the UK than it is in the US. But I really don't like it - I've certainly bought "new" DS games in the past in the US that had saves already on the cartridge (presumably a staff member's).

    It's not as if they're just competing against download distribution. I've never bought a game from Amazon or play.com that had been opened before it arrived (well, aside from the time our local post-office staff decided that stealing was fun, but that's another story) - and those are almost always cheaper. Seriously, do these bricks and mortar retailers even want to stay in business?

    Actually, IANAL, but is there a legal issue here? If there's a reasonable expectation that every copy of the game includes this coupon and Gamestop are removing it, are they committing fraud or theft or something? Either from the consumer or from Square-Enix? I mean, surely Square-Enix must have a civil case here - and it's almost at the kind of level where it starts to sound criminal (if it happened in the UK at least).

    1. Re:You've got to be kidding... by ge7 · · Score: 0

      the best way to do that is to... engage in behaviour that will really piss a good portion of your customers off?

      I seriously doubt that it will piss off a good portion of their customers. Most will probably never know, and those that do just don't really care. Not that I agree with removing them, but just wanted to point that one out.

    2. Re:You've got to be kidding... by prgrmr · · Score: 2

      IANAL either, but I would expect that GameStop owns the games until they sell them, and can do with them as they wish, given that the games are their property. What they are obligated to do or not to do contractually with the game maker may be a different story.

    3. Re:You've got to be kidding... by RogueyWon · · Score: 5, Informative

      I suppose it depends on whether the coupon is advertised anywhere. If it's advertised as being included with the game - and especially if there's a marking on the game box itself saying "coupon inside" - then there are all kinds of trading standards laws that would be getting broken in the UK. I've no idea whether there are US equivalents.

      If the coupon isn't advertised anywhere, then it may be murkier.

    4. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Desler · · Score: 1

      Actually, IANAL, but is there a legal issue here?

      No, why would there be?

      If there's a reasonable expectation that every copy of the game includes this coupon and Gamestop are removing it, are they committing fraud or theft or something?

      Is GameStop advertising that those coupons are in the package but then not having them present when sold? No, they don't. Thus, what fraud is being committed?

      Either from the consumer or from Square-Enix? I mean, surely Square-Enix must have a civil case here - and it's almost at the kind of level where it starts to sound criminal (if it happened in the UK at least).

      Why would Square-Enix have a case? Was GameStop contractually obligated to have the coupons present in the package? That's highly doubtful.

    5. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Pharmboy · · Score: 0

      Yes, except there may be laws that vary from state to state that regulate what you can claim is "new". In some states, having 'saves' on a game might run afoul of the law. Removing the coupon? Likely not, even if it is chickenshit.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    6. Re:You've got to be kidding... by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      Actually, do you know that the coupon isn't advertised on the package? I don't know that it is - but it wouldn't surprise me. I've got plenty of game boxes on my shelf that have, on the box art itself, labels saying "voucher for x inside" or "free demo of y included". And I've got umpteen Blu-Ray discs which say "free digital copy included" and the like.

    7. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are selling used games as if they were new. If they consider a game to be used after the customer has opened it, then the customer should do the same.

    8. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Desler · · Score: 1

      I suppose it depends on whether the coupon is advertised anywhere.

      GameStop does not advertise the coupon as being part of the sold package.

    9. Re:You've got to be kidding... by RogueyWon · · Score: 2

      And it's not marked anywhere on the box? That's what I was getting at - it doesn't really matter what Gamestop is advertising it as on their website and their posters in store. If there's a little marking on the box saying "OnLive voucher included", then they may be in a world of legal hurt. If Square-Enix have something saying "OnLive voucher included in every PC boxed copy" on their website, then they may have issues as well, though that's probably less certain.

    10. Re:You've got to be kidding... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They need a sales tax license, and they need to have the product for "resale" to avoid paying sales tax themselves upon purchase. This sort of tampering may place them under requirement to pay sales tax on the product, rather than reselling it as a new product--they're not authorized to alter it and resell it....

    11. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Desler · · Score: 1

      They are selling used games as if they were new. If they consider a game to be used after the customer has opened it, then the customer should do the same.

      They've done this for years and the FTC supposedly already investigated them for the practice. If there was some great legal issue something would have come of it by now.

    12. Re:You've got to be kidding... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      But how can they sell it as a new product?
      These are now open box games not new games.

    13. Re:You've got to be kidding... by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Maybe GameStop doesn't, but if anyone does I think they're courting legal trouble. GameStop doesn't make any specific claims about what's in the sold package, but if what they're advertising is "a boxed copy of DXHR" and it's common knowledge that such a box includes a coupon from the publisher, there's some bad faith going on.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    14. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to bet it's most likely in violation of US anti-competition laws, if not product tampering. They remove the case contents and CD-key's to prevent shoplifting, but this is the removal and discarding of part of the product intended for purchase.

      As for game-spot entering the digital market- good luck! I enjoy the low hassle of steam, as well as it's healthy support for Indie games. 3 of the past 4 games I've bought have been from small groups. The outlier was fallout 3, the 'game of the year' version with all DLC (always wait for the ultimate/goty/end of marketing life bundled version). It's also been the only one I've gotten bored with before completing it.

    15. Re:You've got to be kidding... by ge7 · · Score: 1
      I think

      Square Enix packed the competitor's coupon with our DXHR product without our prior knowledge

      kind of says it's not mentioned on the box.

    16. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Desler · · Score: 1

      Actually, do you know that the coupon isn't advertised on the package?

      Yes, I do.

    17. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Desler · · Score: 2

      Maybe GameStop doesn't, but if anyone does I think they're courting legal trouble.

      Why?

      GameStop doesn't make any specific claims about what's in the sold package, but if what they're advertising is "a boxed copy of DXHR" and it's common knowledge that such a box includes a coupon from the publisher, there's some bad faith going on.

      Yes, they do. Their website clearly states what you get in the package. The box itself also makes no mention of the coupon, either.

    18. Re:You've got to be kidding... by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      Not really. Could just mean "We hadn't seen the boxes until they arrived in our distribution centres - that's when we saw the label on the box saying there was an OnLive voucher included."

    19. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Desler · · Score: 2

      I'm willing to bet it's most likely in violation of US anti-competition laws, if not product tampering.

      In what way is it a violation of anti-competition laws? GameStop does not hold some significant market share over game sales as they are easily dwarfed by companies like Best Buy. Secondly, GameStop has already been investigated by the FTC for this practice since it's been their company policy FOR YEARS. And since those stories mentioning that are from 2009 and nothing seems to have happened to them, it's doubtful you are correct on either count.

    20. Re:You've got to be kidding... by phorm · · Score: 1

      In that case, they should be selling them as *used*.

    21. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Desler · · Score: 1

      There is nothing on the box at all about the coupon. You could have found this out with a simple google image search.

    22. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is ... pretty much EVERYTHING Gamestop sells is technically open-box. At least around here, all Gamestop locations open every game they receive, remove the game disc, stuff it in an old paper sleeve, and toss it in a drawer with all the others (then re-shrinkwrap the box). It's also fairly common practice for employees to "borrow" games - I've certainly gotten a couple supposedly new games with fingerprints all over the discs as well as a couple scratches (before I stopped shopping at Gamestop a few years back because of crap like this.)

      Of course, this is the same company that THREE TIMES IN A ROW tried to give my friend a non-collector's edition preorder code for The Old Republic when he had pre-ordered the full CE - it took a hand-written letter to the regional VP to actually get what he paid for. =\

    23. Re:You've got to be kidding... by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      They've been selling opened games as new for a long time. I've heard plenty of stories of employees 'borrowing' new games.

    24. Re:You've got to be kidding... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I always ask for a new sealed box when I shop there. The box I get is sealed and contains a game disk. If they are resealing them why is that still a new game? Seems like fraud to me.

    25. Re:You've got to be kidding... by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      Ok, found more information from a farily reputable source

      Bottom line - Gamestop are probably - though not certainly - ok in terms of criminal law - there is indeed no marking on the box. But depending on the nature of their contract with Square-Enix, they may be in line for a world of butt-hurt from that direction.

    26. Re:You've got to be kidding... by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 2

      No, why would there be?

      If it's coupon it has cash value. They are selling a retail package to the customer, minus the coupon, which was intended to be part of that package. This is theft.

    27. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Desler · · Score: 0

      Or you could have bothered to read the linked story:

      Methenitis added that customers might be able to pursue legal action against GameStop for deceptive trade practices or fraudulent advertising, though he doesn’t think they’d have much of a case, as nothing on the game’s packaging suggests that it includes the OnLive code.

    28. Re:You've got to be kidding... by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      It's iffy... Gamestop could be seen as diminishing the value of the item that they're selling you (specifically by the exact value of the coupon), so if they're selling it at standard price, you could have a legal claim to recover the "damages" done. However, I doubt that the coupon is for more value than the $25 that it takes to file a small-claims action (YMMV, this is Washington State's value). So, really the only option is a class-action suit from anyone who purchased the game and did not receive a coupon.

      This is also kind of unlikely. Square Enix though has no claim, because Gamestop is under no duty to sell the products they buy in the exact same condition that they were in when they purchased the items wholesale.

      Although, agreed, if the advertising says that there is a coupon, then Gamestop is potentially running afoul of truth in advertising laws. I somehow almost doubt that they would be so cavalier about removing the coupon if the advertising did though.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    29. Re:You've got to be kidding... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If they "Borrow" a new game then they "used" it making that a used product. Sounds like they need to be sued for this.

    30. Re:You've got to be kidding... by RogueyWon · · Score: 1

      That's kind of what I said. Either you're not reading my posts, or you're trolling. Either way, can't be bothered with you any more.

    31. Re:You've got to be kidding... by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Is that a requirement? Does a box advertise that the game comes with a game manual? I don't think most do. But GameStop would be f*cking with the product if they removed it. If they don't want to sell the games with the coupon, they should return them to Square Enix and tell them to supply them with games without a coupon (that competes with their non-existent and probably lame service).

    32. Re:You've got to be kidding... by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone sue? Best case is you'll get a new, unopened game in exchange - probably the same as if you just took the game back to the store. Then the salesmen try to push the "borrowed" game to someone who doesn't care.

      --
      What?
    33. Re:You've got to be kidding... by guspasho · · Score: 1

      Because they are altering the product between when they receive it and when they sell it, which is likely a major violation of the distribution agreement with their distributor or the manufacturer.

      Imagine if you got an air conditioner from Sears, got it home, installed it, and plugged it in, and found out that when you turn it on it announces "Thank you for shopping at Sears!" It would be no different than if they opened every box and removed all the warranty cards or accessories that supported certain window frames or something like that. The manufacturer/distributor would most definitely have a solid civil case against the retailer for altering their product before sale and then misrepresenting it to their customer as unaltered/new.

    34. Re:You've got to be kidding... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So you think this is fine?

    35. Re:You've got to be kidding... by funkatron · · Score: 1

      IANAL either, but I would expect that GameStop owns the games until they sell them, and can do with them as they wish, given that the games are their property. What they are obligated to do or not to do contractually with the game maker may be a different story.

      Would messing with the contents of the game box affect their ability to claim that it's "new"? I genuinely don't know but my expectation of buying a new product would be that it is the product the manufacturer shipped out, no changes, no wear and tear (well, transport bumps), no missing pieces etc. Taking stuff out the box and selling as new is dodgy in my opinion but I don't know the legal stuff here.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    36. Re:You've got to be kidding... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Unless GameStop clearly states that it's an open box with missing parts, they likely run afoul of the law. There is an implicit warranty that they are selling the complete product as supplied by the manufacturer. The question is if they will be called to task for it. In the U.S., it's doubtful, their action only affects peons. Elsewhere, perhaps.

    37. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I'm just thinking that it isn't new anymore if they have opened it and take a part out of the box. GameStop will be marking all of these boxes as "Used" right?

    38. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Sir+Realist · · Score: 2

      I think there's a legal issue even if it isn't advertised... from Square's pov. Now that word has gotten out that they're doing this, Square could claim that GS's practices are hurting the sales of their game. Not a law broken, as such, but certainly grounds for a civil suit.

    39. Re:You've got to be kidding... by interkin3tic · · Score: 0

      +1 to that. I worked at a gamestop about 6 years ago. Gamestop makes its money on people who don't realize they could get much better deals online, they're not exactly "informed" customers.

      I regularly had to tell people "The display console is off. That controller you're holding and mashing buttons on while grunting? That's not powered on. You're not playing a game right now. Put it down. No, see, it's not on. Nothing. Zero....

      Why are you still staring at it and pressing buttons? Videogames need electricity to work, the power button... (sigh) fuck it. You're about to win!"

      They'll boycott gamestop if and only if the employees mug them at gunpoint when they come in.

    40. Re:You've got to be kidding... by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      I would think that the publisher does have some recourse.

      This isn't like how the movie studios can't stop redbox from renting new movies without paying more (since anything they can't get from a distributor, the operators just go buy at a store)...gamestop probably has a contract.

      If gamestop was making a free and clear purchase and then reselling the items, they might be ok doing this...but I bet that in exchange for getting a massive discount on the game, they have agreed to some pretty clear terms which probably include something about selling the product as is.

      --
      Bottles.
    41. Re:You've got to be kidding... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Does the website clearly indicate that what you receive is altered from the manufacturer's package?

      If it does, I sure don't see it, or any other description of the contents, just a summary of the game itself.

    42. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gamestop has fanbois?!?!

      You must be one considering how vehemently you are defending them in this thread.

    43. Re:You've got to be kidding... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I used to buy games there... it's a terrible place to buy games, I haven't been in many years. One of the reasons is because I'd buy a new PS2 game, and not only was the shrink wrap off and the game not in the box until you bought it, but you never knew what else might have been in the package; on top of everything, the price tag was on the actual box, and they were the kind of stickers that screwed everything up when you tried to take it off. That wasn't "used," that was for NEW games.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    44. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Mitsoid · · Score: 1

      I would suspect that unless *Gamestop* advertises there is a coupon inside, they are not falsely advertising.... It was not there advertisement --- Think similar to Fast food chains "In participating stores" -- They can't force all privately owned stores to follow a promotion...

      So even though the game might be advertising it, I don't believe they can force their advertisement on others (but by the same token, those same game designers are not required to sell their product to Gamestop, or barred from having a contract in place that doesn't allow them to do this if they want to sell their products)

    45. Re:You've got to be kidding... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 3

      They'll boycott gamestop if and only if the employees mug them at gunpoint when they come in.

      You're giving them more credit than they deserve...

    46. Re:You've got to be kidding... by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      (IANAL) The legal issue here is going to be tortuous interference, however GameStop could just as easily argue that adding the coupon for a competitive business to be distributed by GameStop without their knowledge could itself be considered tortuous interference, especially since the only purpose for giving away a free game to GameStop customers would be to interfere with the relationship between GameStop and its customers.

      Granted, I'm sure the coupon is in every box, not just the ones sold through GameStop, but every other retailer would have a similar legal complaint. At the very least it reduces OnLive's legal reaction from a civil suit to a cease-and-desist letter.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    47. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Actually, IANAL, but is there a legal issue here? If there's a reasonable expectation that every copy of the game includes this coupon and Gamestop are removing it, are they committing fraud or theft or something?

      The coupon's part of the package. Meaning it's also part of the product.

      If you know from the manufacturer sources that the coupon is part of this product, you go to Gamestop, buy the product, and open the package to find part of the product missing then the product is not complete.

      This is no different from going to a store, and buying a computer monitor, e.g. you go ask to buy A sony XXXXXX, and you know that a DVI cable is part of the package, but a store employee covertly breaks the seal on the package, and steals out the DVI cable and software.

      All the way up to.... you went to a store to buy a set of drill bits... you open the box, and the bit you need was removed by a store employee from the sealed box before they sold it to you as new.

      In other words, you should be able to take this back to the store and return this for a refund, as an incomplete product -- they did not give you what you purchased.

      It's the same, whether the item removed is worth 10% or 50% of the product's price.

    48. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 2

      If the coupon isn't advertised anywhere, then it may be murkier.

      If the coupon were not advertised anywhere, we on Slashdot would probably not know or care about it.

    49. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      There is nothing on the box at all about the coupon.

      How do you know Square enix hasn't designed a different box version or sticker to attach to boxes they put a coupon in?

      If Gamestop has no qualms against breaking open a sealed box; I have little doubt that they'd mind getting a marker and blacking out any mention of 'coupon'.

      But all these things make what they're selling a modified product. If they're selling it as new, with an opened box, they may be running afoul of some consumer protection laws

    50. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 2

      I would suspect that unless *Gamestop* advertises there is a coupon inside, they are not falsely advertising

      The 'false advertising' would be the advertisement that we sell this product, this new game; instead of "We sell an open box copy of this product that has some components removed which were contained in the original product"

    51. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      What you're talking about is selling used as new. That is usually illegal.

      What they're doing here is opening the package, checking contents without using the actual product (game). This does not make the product used.

    52. Re:You've got to be kidding... by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      I think that's against the EULA, they are contracted to sell licenses of the game as specified by the publisher.

    53. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      No offence, but no retailer in the world will have any problems breaking "sealed boxes". In most cases their supplier will help them get new seals, or they can ship product back as "defective, contents do not match agreement" and get it back sealed. Retailers essentially ALWAYS have a right to break the seal, unless it's an obvious "warranty void if broken" kind of a seal on the product itself (think unscrewing the game cartridge open). Shrink wrap is not that kind of seal, and essentially every retailer has a shrink wrapping machine in the back specifically for purpose of re-wrapping boxes.

    54. Re:You've got to be kidding... by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Well the square enix news release here: http://release.square-enix.com/na/2011/08/23_02.html mentions the free onlive coupons and I quote "Purchasers of the PC retail packaged version of DEUS EX: HUMAN REVOLUTION will be entitled to a free OnLive digital copy of the game..."

    55. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      They need a sales tax license, and they need to have the product for "resale" to avoid paying sales tax themselves upon purchase.

      VARs (Value added resellers) buy things, add value to them, and resell them all the time, without incurring sales tax liability.

      For example, a computer system builder might purchase packs of Redhat licenses to install in the computers that they resell. Sales tax is due on the final product, not the parts that were purchased.

      I have little doubt that VRR (Value removed resellers) are still excluded from sales tax, as long as they aren't purchasing the product for their own use, or keeping part of it. I assume they destroy the coupons that are removed.

      They could (oddly) claim they are adding value to the product by removing advertising.

    56. Re:You've got to be kidding... by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      no one does, half the people talking about stopping buying from them

      --
      warning pointless sig
    57. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet it's most likely in violation of US anti-competition laws, if not product tampering.

      Interesting... how about tortious interference with business relationships?

      To quote WP,

      Tortious interference with business relationships occurs where the tortfeasor acts to prevent the plaintiff from successfully establishing or maintaining business relationships. This tort may occur when a first party's conduct intentionally causes a second party not to enter into a business relationship with a third party that otherwise would probably have occurred. Such conduct is termed tortious interference with prospective business relations, expectations, or advantage or with prospective economic advantage.

    58. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Secondly, GameStop has already been investigated by the FTC for this practice since it's been their company policy FOR YEARS.

      Gamestop had a valid explanation no doubt.... removing the valuable disk from the package, in order to secure it so that it could not easily be stolen.

      Most consumers could probably accept this, understanding that the product is just being secured, and not otherwise modified or used.

      However..... taking items from the package sold to the customer, and not providing them part of the product; is a different animal, and might be cause for a new FTC investigation.......

    59. Re:You've got to be kidding... by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      I would suspect that unless *Gamestop* advertises there is a coupon inside, they are not falsely advertising

      The 'false advertising' would be the advertisement that we sell this product, this new game; instead of "We sell an open box copy of this product that has some components removed which were contained in the original product"

      The coupon is not a necessary part of the game though. It's an extraneous addition. As I said, one would have a claim, but it's up to a jury/judge to decide if the coupon constitutes a substantial part of purchase interest.

      The parent comment is correct, it's unlikely that they could be held liable for false advertising unless the advertisement is apparent from Gamestop: either Gamestop is making the claim, or the coupon is advertised on the box.

      The point of all of this is: this is a really really dick thing to do... but fundamentally does not rise to the level of being significantly legally liable.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    60. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Law != morality. If they want to sell opened games as new, then they should have no problem accepting opened games for full refunds.

    61. Re:You've got to be kidding... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      well what if it was a game with say an addon controller that they took out of the package and sold the game sans addon controller. I feel this is no different

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    62. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The coupon is not a necessary part of the game though. It's an extraneous addition. As I said, one would have a claim, but it's up to a jury/judge to decide if the coupon constitutes a substantial part of purchase interest.

      Who gets to decide if the coupon is a "necessary" part of the game? If I was on the fence, and the manufacturer including coupons was what tipped the scales to me buying a new copy of the game, I would call that fairly necessary.

      I suppose based on this "not a necessary part" logic; a bookseller could sell you a "new" book and "cut out" the last page.... it's not a "necessary part" of the book, just an extraneous addition; you can still read the book, you just don't get to read the epilogue, or maybe the ending, is all.

    63. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even if not advertised, I'm sure OnLive paid money to include that coupon in the game (no one goes to the expense of printing and including them in their game box out of charity). So if the coupons are removed it would seem to give OnLive a valid reason to sue GameStop for damages.

    64. Re:You've got to be kidding... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      Gamestop makes its money on people who don't realize they could get much better deals online, they're not exactly "informed" customers.

      Not always. The closest store to me that sells video games is Gamestop. If I want a physical copy of a game right now, it's the easiest way to get it. Could I get it cheaper at Wal-Mart? Sure, but it's 15 minutes farther, might or might not have it, and if I get it there, I might get hassled by the door Nazis, which I really don't like. For some customers, the cheapest option isn't the best. Sometimes other factors outweigh price.

      It's much the same for books. I'll buy a book in a brick and mortar store because I can have it right now if I do, vs tomorrow if I'm willing to pay a lot in shipping, or a couple days if I'm not. I'll pay $5-6 for a magazine when I can get half a year's subscription for that price because I want something to read while I'm having lunch.

      Bottom line, sometimes apparently dumb consumers simply have different priorities than you do.

    65. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GameStop owns the games until they sell them, and can do with them as they wish, given that the games are their property.
       
      Actually, nobody ever owns it... it is licensed.

    66. Re:You've got to be kidding... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Call it "deprived them of potential profit" and call it "theft."

    67. Re:You've got to be kidding... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      I said I worked there. The customers who gamestop made most of their money off of WERE dumb: they would trade ten games back for $10 apiece towards a new game.

      You're not dumb to shop there for buying a new game that you want right then and there, you're dumb if you trade there because they'll give you a pittance for your year-old games.

    68. Re:You've got to be kidding... by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      They already do that - to the point that when some game consoles came with a one-controller package and a two-controller package, they would remove the second controller, re-bag it, and sell it. They would then just slap the two-controller retail box in with the normal one-controller retail boxes. Gamestop employees have also be caught "stealing" DLC codes out of game boxes, game posters from the game boxes, advertising cutouts (you know, the big cardboard ones with game characters), and in more than one instance, game manuals themselves out of Collector's Editions.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    69. Re:You've got to be kidding... by delinear · · Score: 1

      They'll boycott gamestop if and only if the employees mug them at gunpoint when they come in.

      Minus the gunpoint that's pretty much already the model. I can't believe all the people I see in there are so uninformed - there are plenty of young, net savvy people in there (although there are also plenty of confused looking older relatives). The only reason I can possibly believe anyone shops at these places is the "I want it now" attitude. That's where digital distribution worries them far more than online shopping does, which explains why they're taking underhand measures to fight it. Although if half of what we hear about OnLive's performance is true, they might do more to fight it by giving away free vouchers and showing people how bad it is :)

    70. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the booklet isn't advertised anywhere either. Perhaps GameStop should remove that too. They could then sell them for an extra $5.

    71. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that necessarily dumb? If there's no other trade in option nearby and you really don't want the hassle of selling them online and any money back is better than none then it's quick and convenient, you know roughly what you'll get and you know it's reasonably hassle free. I've never traded games in personally but I can still see how it might be a reasonable option for some people. Dumb is doing something without reason, if you've thought it through and arrived at the conclusion that it's good enough that's not dumb.

    72. Re:You've got to be kidding... by delinear · · Score: 1

      This is one of the primary reasons I buy so few games from bricks and mortar stores in the UK. There are a couple (mostly big supermarkets) who don't engage in the practice of opening the game and storing the contents in a drawer behind the counter, but more and more seem to go with the latter approach. Considering how much hassle it would be to get a game exchanged on the basis that it was scratched (I know how much trouble it is with pre-owned games), I'm not willing to let them introduce another opportunity that they can use to damage the product before selling it to me. I'm sure they'd argue that sticking the disk in a tight fitting cardboard sleeve and throwing it into a drawer then trying to manhandle it back out and into the case while juggling bags and cash and other products and vouchers and whatever else is risk free, but why take the chance when I can buy the game sealed online, usually cheaper (and if it's a pre-order like this, often get it the day before release).

    73. Re:You've got to be kidding... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Gamestop almost certainly has no contract with Squenix that could possibly trump first sale doctrine. If any agreements are in place they are over advertising.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    74. Re:You've got to be kidding... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      A part of the product is retained (even if it's disposed of), rather than sold on. If I buy things and throw them away, I'm liable for paying sales tax.

    75. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Well in Minnesota filing fees for small claims court are recoverable. If I remember it is something like $32 so you could file for $25 for the coupon plus $32 for the filing fee. As this would seem to be a cut and dry case you could be in and out of court in about 15 minutes. I have filed in small claims court before and it is much less formal that regular court, just present you evidence to the judge and the other party presents theirs and then the judge rules. If you have clear and overwhelming evidence you might be lucky enough to have a judge tell the other party that they are completely incompetent. Now if enough people did this to Game Stop they might quit being such douche bags as they would have to pay someone to go and represent the company for each of these cases and then pay the $57 or so for each case. That really would damage the company.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    76. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      If one were to sue a company in small claims court it does cost the company more than the loss of the recovered money. They have to pay someone to represent the company for the time at court.

      I successfully did this to an insurance company that didn't want to pay the fair market value for a wrecked vehicle even though I had overwhelming evidence the value they wanted to give mew was wrong (NADA, KBB, independent appraisal, comparable vehicle values, paperwork documenting the work that had been done on the car, and pictures before the accident). I tried to negotiate with them in good faith for several months and when they wouldn't negotiate in good faith I took them to court. The car ended up sitting in storage for 6 months the insurance company had to pay for that, they had to pay for someone to show up in court, they had to pay the small claims court filing fee when I won, and they had to pay the amount I was suing for. As an added bonus the judge told the rep from the insurance company that they should have just settled as I was negotiating in good faith and that their value was a complete fabrication with no supporting evidence to back it up.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    77. Re:You've got to be kidding... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yeah - about the only thing I buy there are marked-down PC adventure games in the stores that actually carry PC games. The only reason I continue to go in is to see used copies of games that have been out for a year, marked at the price that other stores were charging for it new the year before. That, and to try out the 3DS.

    78. Re:You've got to be kidding... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Must be nice if your local one re-seals the box. The ones here put a permanent-adhesive price sticker right on the bare original box. You can't remove it when you get home without destroying the pretty package.

    79. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um. GameStop owns one of the online distribution channels. So, that is the problem see. The competition (ie another online distribution channel), not the brick and mortar - btw - they probably are doing this for online sales of the boxed game as well.

    80. Re:You've got to be kidding... by shentino · · Score: 1

      Unless some lobbyist paid off a politician to tell the FTC to look the other way.

      Regulatory capture is all too common these days.

    81. Re:You've got to be kidding... by shentino · · Score: 1

      As long as they adhere to the law, Square Enix can sell whatever they damn please, and Gamestop is perfectly free to tell them where to stick it if they don't like the terms.

      Gamestop is not, however, free to, covertly or otherwise, tamper with the product and then continue to represent it as new.

      My guess is that this is all bluster and sabre rattling. I wouldn't be surprised if the elites involved have a gentleman's agreement not to fight over it.

    82. Re:You've got to be kidding... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      A part of the product is retained (even if it's disposed of), rather than sold on.

      If they remove the coupon and destroy the coupon, or return the coupon to the manufacturer, then by definition, they have not retained it.

      Anyways, the coupon's a promotional gimmick of no commercial value, the sales tax due on it would be $0.

    83. Re:You've got to be kidding... by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      The coupon is not a necessary part of the game though. It's an extraneous addition. As I said, one would have a claim, but it's up to a jury/judge to decide if the coupon constitutes a substantial part of purchase interest.

      Who gets to decide if the coupon is a "necessary" part of the game?
      If I was on the fence, and the manufacturer including coupons was what tipped the scales to me buying a new copy of the game, I would call that fairly necessary.

      Relevant answer that you already quoted has been bolded for your convenience.

      I suppose based on this "not a necessary part" logic; a bookseller could sell you a "new" book and "cut out" the last page.... it's not a "necessary part" of the book,
      just an extraneous addition; you can still read the book, you just don't get to read the epilogue, or maybe the ending, is all.

      It's pretty likely that a jury and/or judge would agree with an argument that the epilogue or final pages of a book are a substantial part of a book, and thus a purchaser expects to receive the whole and entire book.

      However, say a book came with an insert, with an unrelated picture or such in it advertising for a book from the publisher. The argument becomes more vague at this point, and the answer is not immediately clear.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    84. Re:You've got to be kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think GP meant selling a 'new product' - not selling 'as a new product' - e.g. by modifying the 'raw material' of the original product, they have created a second, new, product.

  3. Re:First! by Cutting_Crew · · Score: 0

    ok so - why would they want to do this again - especially when Square didn't give them that authority..

  4. So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by tekrat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cool. I can violate every provision of the EULA, and it's GameStop that has to agree to the terms.

    I wonder if that'll hold up in a court of law?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by ge7 · · Score: 2

      Just because GameStop agreed to the EULA by opening the box (not that this has ever been agreed to in court, or that I know of Deus Ex even having this), doesn't mean you can violate their terms.

    2. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Khyber · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, you can. You didn't agree to shit, Gamestop did. You are under no obligation at all to abide by the EULA, especially since I'll bet that EULA has a clause about non-transferrable property that kicks in upon opening of the software packaging.

      Gamestop is then violating the EULA, their problem, not yours.

      As it is, this is product tampering, and bait and switch, not to mention anti-competitive practice.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can. You didn't agree to shit, Gamestop did. You are under no obligation at all to abide by the EULA, especially since I'll bet that EULA has a clause about non-transferrable property that kicks in upon opening of the software packaging.

      Gamestop is then violating the EULA, their problem, not yours.

      As it is, this is product tampering, and bait and switch, not to mention anti-competitive practice.

      No, sorry. The EULA agreement pops up during installation. Bait and switch does not occur since the coupon was never promised. Not providing a competitor's marketing coupon cannot reasonably be considered as anti-competitive.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    4. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by darthnoodles · · Score: 1

      So very wrong. Opening a box does not mean you agree to the EULA. The sticker usually just states that by using the software you agree to the terms of the EULA, not opening the package itself.

    5. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Why not? The whole legal basis for the EULA is that you took a specific action to indicate agreement. In the case of GameStop, you didn't take that action.

      That leaves you responsible only for the default copyright terms.

      Of course, it would cost you plenty to actually get such a ruling IF you could find a court that doesn't just go through the motions.

    6. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you are in violation of copyright. The copying of the game to the HDD and then from the HDD to memory is an unauthorised copy without the EULA. It is bulshit, but there is legal precedent for this, and why we have EULAs

    7. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, sorry. The EULA agreement pops up during installation.

      Funny, that. All I ever see is a blank page with no terms.

      Whether or not there's a 0 byte read-only file in my temp directory named 'eula.txt' is rather irrelevant.

    8. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with everything you said, but I must point out that you normally have to agree to an EULA when installing the game.

      When I install software, I never agree with the EULA. Thus I never follow its requirements of clicking "I Don't Agree" like it says to (because that would be agreeing). Instead I click "I Agree", since there's no other option, and the software happily installs itself anyway :)

    9. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      You would have a valid point, except that every PC game I've ever bought (boxed/retail) that had a EULA, popped it up during installation and asked you to agree to the terms before allowing you to continue the installation process. So the "specific action to indicate agreement" to which you allude is clicking "I agree" and "Continue" in the installation dialog box.

      I can't remember a single game that came with a Microsoft Windows style "BY OPENING THIS BOX YOU FORFEIT YOUR SOUL" EULA. Also, as previously noted, the text on the box will be "by using this software you agree to the terms of the EULA", not "by opening this box for the first time, you agree to the terms of the EULA".

      Not that what they did isn't a sneaky, evil thing to do, but this EULA stuff is nonsense.

    10. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, EA argued that one against me in court, stating that opening the box did indeed constitute agreement to what was contained therein. Very miserably shot down, and the main reason they settled against my class-action suit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      That's because the courts (IIRC in several separate countries) banned the by opening the shrink wrap you agree to the EULA you can't have read yet quite a few years ago. Some of the early ones were that bad. It's also why one has phrases like "except where permitted by local laws" dotted throughout such text.

    12. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      So, let me get this straight. Someone makes a statement that a EULA is not enforceable just from opening the box, and you present a case where this claim was argued, but failed... and you start it off with "actually, ..." as if the person's statement was incorrect?

      Just because some jagoff argued it in court doesn't mean that it will fly, and in fact, if it was argued in court and got shot down, then it's even more unlikely that anyone would ever claim that the argument would ever apply again.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    13. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, dumbshit. Fair use means if you buy a used game you can make any copies required for you to use it.

    14. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Khyber · · Score: 2

      You are implying corporations ever really learn from their mistakes.

      They'll try to claim the same thing again. This is how we play the legal game.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    15. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not bait and switch, you dipshit. Go and learn what that means before you use it.

    16. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're telling me that EULA's don't count if they are from a used product? I can see so many exploits if this is true...

    17. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you honestly think that if you give someone money for intellectual property, but don't agree to their terms, that they are required by law to give you license to use it anyway?

      If I go down to, say, Adobe, and give them 50 cents for a license to use Photoshop... their reply is "no, we do not agree to that"... you claim fair use allows you to use it and copy it as much as you wish for your personal use, even though they didn't agree to the terms?

      See, they are NOT required by law or morality or anything to give you a license to use their product. What an EULA is, is a LICENSE AGREEMENT to allow you to copy and use IP under certain use cases. (Remember, they are not required to give you any license at all) Yes, once they give you a license for these specific use cases then fair use law applies... but that doesn't override sections of an EULA that comply with fair use laws.

      If you do not agree to the EULA, assuming its clauses are legal (for example, they can't require that you sell them your first born child), they can very legally (and rightfully) revoke an offer for a license to use their software, and there is nothing you can do about it.

    18. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But are you even licensed to use the product at all?

    19. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by TeraCo · · Score: 1

      That leaves you responsible only for the default copyright terms.

      Of course, it would cost you plenty to actually get such a ruling IF you could find a court that doesn't just go through the motions.

      The default terms for copyright are: You can't copy my shit without my permission. If you agree to the EULA, the vendor relaxes those terms to let you copy your game into computer memory and 'play' it.

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    20. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how you can be in violation of copyright without distributing it.

      Please explain how this is possible.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    21. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is so dumb that it doesn't warrant a reply. But here.

      If I go down to, say, Adobe, and give them 50 cents for a license to use Photoshop... their reply is "no, we do not agree to that"... you claim fair use allows you to use it and copy it as much as you wish for your personal use

      Wrong, you idiot, and I never claimed that. What I said was if you buy a used copy of Adobe Photoshop for fifty cents at a yard sale, you are licensed to use it and if you have to make copies or circumvent DRM to do so you are within the rights of fair use to do so. Adobe can't say "no, you're not the original purchaser so you're not allowed to use it". Although obviously they'd like to: then you'd have to buy a copy full-price from them.

    22. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      DMCA? Otherwise, +100 insightful.

    23. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      default for copyright law is you can't distribute copies without permission. My CD player has anti-skip measures, so it reads the data into a buffer. Does that mean that since my music CD's don't have EULA's that I'm breaking the law?

    24. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You're the dipshit.

      It was announced that this coupon would be coming with the game.

      For Gamestop to remove the coupon and give you just the game after you paid for the game with coupon is EXACTLY bait and switch.

      Come back when you've got the extensive court experience (and victories) that I have against large game companies for this exact bullshit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    25. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you are copying the software (to your hard disk) without a license, no?

    26. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flat out *wrong*. Copyright law has explicit provisions for software which allow you to make any copies necessary to run the software. They were added because software companies actually tried to make the argument that you just made.

    27. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      You're implying that natural people would act any differently.

      There are still natural people who claim that the 16th Amendment wasn't properly ratified and thus not actually law, and thus Congress has no legal ability to levy income taxes. (Of which the only interesting mistake in the argument is the assumption that Congress was unable to levy income taxes prior to the 16th Amendment.) ... Actually, to date, I don't think there is one single legal person who has attempted this argument in court. Probably because a legal person must be represented by a lawyer, and no lawyer would be so stupid as to make an argument that guarantees a $5,000 fine...

      Anyways, people are free to argue just about anything in court that they have evidence to support, or think case law supports. Lawyers may even entirely misconstrue and misquote non-applying statutes in order to convince the judge that their position is only valid one, or the case should be dismissed, or whatever.

      That does not mean that opposing counsel won't raise objections to the such motions, or that judges won't listen to opposing counsel when it does raise such objections. It is however almost always the opposing counsel's job to point out errors in their adversary's arguments.

      So, if you want to argue that legal persons, or more specifically their lawyers (as they are the ones making these arguments, not corporations) are ballsy enough, and intelligent enough to throw all the spaghetti on the wall in hopes that opposing counsel will slip up and let something slide, then you're absolutely right. Only an idiot would not throw everything they have (except frivolous arguments, see above, they come with fines) out, just because some court somewhere else ruled against it. Sure it's a hell of a long shot argument, with almost no chance of actually making it, but by god, that's what zealous representation is all about.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    28. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I remember picking up a copy of Wizardry in the late 90's (playing for nostalgia's sake; a childhood friend had it and I'd never owned it) that shipped a CD in a paper sleeve, and the sleeve was affixed with a sticker that read "by breaking this seal you agree to the terms of the EULA" ... with said EULA being on a file in the CD that I hadn't opened yet. I had to call tech support with some install troubles (really, really lousy port to the Mac had a lot of trouble) and gave the guy some crap about the impossibility of agreeing to terms I couldn't even read, and the tech good-naturedly agreed with me about the issue.

    29. Re:So, Gamestop has agreed to EULA? by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Totally incorrect. Settled case law is that no "licence" is needed to use the product, including copying the game to memory

  5. Cereal box by Palshife · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This would be like my grocery store opening my cereal box to get the toy out so that I'm more likely to buy toys from the store.

    Fucked. Up.

    --
    Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    1. Re:Cereal box by MobileC · · Score: 2

      It'd be more like the store opening up the cereal to remove a toy advertising a competitor they told the distributor not to include in the first place.

      --

      Fran
      :):):)
      1st 1st Poster of the new Millennium!

    2. Re:Cereal box by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Still fucked up. I don't want any of their employees opening my food and possibly contaminating it. If you don't want to sell the product with the toy, send it the f back and demand product without the competing product. Your inter-business dealings have little to do with the customer you supposedly serve.

    3. Re:Cereal box by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      Still fucked up. I don't want any of their employees opening my food and possibly contaminating it. If you don't want to sell the product with the toy, send it the f back and demand product without the competing product. Your inter-business dealings have little to do with the customer you supposedly serve.

      Do you eat your DVDs? wtf?

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    4. Re:Cereal box by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      That still does not justify the actions. A store has the right to chose what they do and don't carry, If they don't want the coupon, they don't have to carry the game. Either way the customer has to have a notice letting them know things have been removed. You cannot just take something out of a product and sell it at the same price and keep it hidden from the customer.

    5. Re:Cereal box by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Huh? Too lazy to read the comment I'm replying to to figure this out for yourself?

    6. Re:Cereal box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd be more like the store opening up the cereal to remove a toy advertising a competitor they told the distributor not to include in the first place.

      You realise that the advertising leaflet is actually a code for a digital copy of the game, not just a piece of paper...

    7. Re:Cereal box by shentino · · Score: 1

      Gamestop has every right to tamper with the product and mess with the contents as they please.

      What they cannot do is then still claim it is new.

      Removing contents is just an issue between them and Square Enix. The minute they fib to the consumer about it being brand new, however, they are committing fraud.

    8. Re:Cereal box by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      I was commenting on your analogy train wreck. But clearly you take everything as literally as possible.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    9. Re:Cereal box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmmmmm.

      - Roy the Walmart Supercenter Supervisor.

  6. Does anyone else smell that? That smell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smells like a lawsuit coming. Anti-competitive business practice, I believe. Something about using their market position.

    Luckily, my crystal ball is back from the shop. It shows they will stop the practice, not pay any fine, and admit no wrongdoing. It will be clarified as a communication mistake and they will implement unspecified training to ensure it doesn't happen again.

  7. Steam or Amazon ftw! by Kildjean · · Score: 1

    ... and this is why I don't buy my games from the galactic empire (gamestop) anymore...

    --
    Nom de dieu de putain de bordel de merde de saloperie de connard d encule de ta mere.
    1. Re:Steam or Amazon ftw! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd rather buy them straight from the Sith, with no ability to resell the game, DRM-client overhead and being at the mercy of Steam when it comes to playing games you paid for? Sounds perfectly reasonable.

  8. DIsgusting by atari2600a · · Score: 2

    To think I wanted to work there as a child...

    1. Re:DIsgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To think I wanted to work there as a child...

      Are you saying you want to dress up as a child and work there?

    2. Re:DIsgusting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To think I wanted to work there as a child...

      They use child labour too? Is there nothing to which GameStop will not stoop?

    3. Re:DIsgusting by clem · · Score: 1

      Reach for the stars, kid.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    4. Re:DIsgusting by atari2600a · · Score: 1

      I WOULD be reaching for the OnLive coupons, but you know how that is...

  9. Gamestop has always opened games by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    I don't know what the reasoning is, but they do it. They reseal them when they sell them. So it is nothing different for this one. If you demand factory sealed games, Gamestop was never a place you shopped.

    Also to note Onlive isn't a distribution method. Onlive is a service where they run the games on their servers and stream you the video. The idea being you don't need to have a good computer to run the game. In reality it sucks badly since you only get a low bitrate 720p steam, meaning it does not look like you get with a high end system, more like with a low end one, and there's interface lag because of the network round trip.

    In terms of digital distribution, Gamestop actually is in that business, they purchased Impulse some time ago so they now sell games online as well as in stores.

    1. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I did not know this. I always ask for a sealed game when I shop their, never taking the open ones from the shelf. I guess I will stop going their at all.

      How is it legal to claim that these are new games?
      Does amazon also open games and sell them as new?

    2. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression they only opened games that were used for display. I know I have purchased several unseal XBox 360 games from them in the past with the microsoft seal in tact. I don't think they would carry extra ones of those.

    3. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      I think the only requirement for selling something as new is that it has not been sold before. You find at places like, say, Target, that they can sell an item even if the box has been opened and the contents inspected, which happens sometimes by curious customers.

      Amazon does not do that. It would be inconvenient for them to do so. They are about low costs of operation. They just ship the games out as they receive them.

    4. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      So then even their employees using the item does not make it used?

      Glad to hear that about amazon, I will from now on not buy new games at GS.

    5. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      I would think that would qualify as it being used, though I don't know the law well enough to say for sure.

    6. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Interesting point... there's a lot of contention with dealerships that get "dealer" tags for cars instead of regular license plates, they (or their spouses or employees or whatever) can drive the car for YEARS and then sell it as "new," technically speaking.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    7. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      XD nice work troll, but i think u mean "i tnk u mean u 'will srsly stop goin there.' UR WELCOME;"

      --
      warning pointless sig
    8. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by mysidia · · Score: 1

      dealerships that get "dealer" tags for cars instead of regular license plates, they (or their spouses or employees or whatever) can drive the car for YEARS

      If it's not a dealership company owned car, then they lied (fraud).

      If it isowner by their dealership company, then their spouses/whatever driving around the car making personal use of company property.... incurs a tax liability owed to the IRS; personal use of company property is "income", and if they don't report it... they could go down for tax fraud, which has more serious penalties than lying to a few consumers.

    9. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This practice isn't even close to being new. I still remember purchasing Jet Force Gemini at a gamestop well over a decade ago. When I got home and started it up there was a save file with over 15 hours of gameplay on it. Given that they had the temerity to sell me their display copy or copy that some employee had played as brand new I have not purchased anything from them since.

    10. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh!

    11. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reason for the opening is simply to stop shoplifting. If the display boxes don't have discs in them, no point in stealing them.

    12. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They sell it as "new" but with mileage, if you can't understand the relevance of the odometer you deserve what you get.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      That's not the problem, though - they get to use the car and then sell it as "new," getting a tax write-off on the depreciation since, as you point out, it's obviously not "new." Now getting deductions for depreciation is not new, but when you're depreciating the value of a "new" item by using for personal use, that's a problem... and they're not supposed to use it that way, but there's little way to prove otherwise.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    14. Re:Gamestop has always opened games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at one for a while. There's a shrinkwrap machine in the backroom for customer's who want sealed games.

      Also, don't even think of buying a game with an online activation code printed somewhere in the box, there's a good chance it's already been used.

  10. Wow by daemonc · · Score: 5, Funny

    What a bunch of deusbags.

    --
    All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
    1. Re:Wow by readandburn · · Score: 1

      Well bowled, sir.

    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I would rather be a douche-bag than a deuce-bag, personally. I suppose it has to do with what I would have to eat.

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a bunch of duesbags

      FTFY :)

    4. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which would be funny if Deus wasn't pronounced as "DAY-us".

  11. Can it even still be considered new? by Rinnon · · Score: 2

    When I purchase something that is advertised as "New" I expect it to BE new. I want it to be sold to me as it was shipped from the distributor. By opening these boxes and removing whatever the fuck they want, are these games even allowed to be called "new" anymore? I avoid shopping at Game Stop to begin with (There is fortunately a local store that has better prices and more selection), but when I DO need to buy a "new" game from them... I'm going to start insisting that they only give me sealed boxes. If a game is not still factory sealed, I'm going to demand it be sold at the used price point, as this is essentially now an "open box" item.

    1. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by jmauro · · Score: 1

      Umm, this is GameStop. They don't sell Factory sealed items, even on things marked "new".

    2. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      They sure make it appear as though they do.
      I take the open box to the counter then request a sealed one. If they are resealing them than I want to pay open box not new prices.

    3. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Desler · · Score: 1

      You do realize that for most popular, new games they still sell the "used" versions for like 95% of the price of the new copies, right? You're not going to save much of anything.

    4. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      It does not matter if it is only a 1% difference. That is X% they are stealing.

      Is it ok for me to commit fraud if it is for small values?

      Do you work for these scumbags? Why else would you defend such practices?

    5. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      when I DO need to buy a "new" game from them... I'm going to start insisting that they only give me sealed boxes.

      They have resealing machines. You can't count on a sealed game to be "new" at GameStop.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      When I purchase something that is advertised as "New" I expect it to BE new

      You do realize the clothes you buy may even have been tried on by someone else, right?

      Do they lose their "new" status too? Or do you after trying on a jacket, demand that they bring you one that no else has tried on?

      By opening these boxes and removing whatever the fuck they want, are these games even allowed to be called "new" anymore?

      If they opened printer boxes, dropped a usb cable inside, and slapped a sticker that said "USB cable included" on the front you would be deeply offended?

      If a game is not still factory sealed...

      And this is important why?

      I'm going to demand it be sold at the used price point, as this is essentially now an "open box" item.

      Yes, it is essentially an "open box" item. That doesn't make it the same as a "used" item.

      You can demand whatever you like, but they'll probably just ask you to leave the store. You have no legal right to dictate that they sell open box items for a particular price. They can sell any item in the store for any price. They don't legally have to give discounts for open box items, or even for used items.

    7. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because Desler has a long-running history of being a trolling cocksucker. Think Kristopeit minus the catchphrases.

    8. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 1

      I take issue with open box being represented as new in a retail sense. I consider clothing that is not packaged as open box. An unopened box has more long term value to me (and most collectors) than an open box item. See price of older games that are new unused vs. used copies of those games. For some items open box is fine to me as long as you represent it as such. I would take issue with someone trying on a pair of boxers that were packaged and then the store replacing them in a package and reselling them.

      I take issue even more with an altered product being represented as new. Altering product even by addition of a printer cable changes the value for me. In the printer example if you told me you added a cable I would be fine and more likely to not only purchase the product but come back to your location again because you add value. If it was a game where factory sealed matters to me and you added like a strategy guide into the box or something, even though you are adding value, for me I would not want to purchase it because it is not in its original condition and that is what I want, though I'd still not hold the practice against you if you told me that was what you did. If you alter or use a product like a game where I care about the state and then represent it to me as it is, I'm much less likely to purchase the item than if you lie and indicate it is new. Because I always always try to buy new product. I love me that new game smell.

      I don't know what the law states. And I am not claiming that they can get in trouble for this. My feeling is that they *should* get in trouble for this because they are misrepresenting product in order to generate more revenue despite they actually are altering the product to remove value.

    9. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Also one more point is I honestly don't care what price they sell the open box item at. They could sell it at the normal price. I care that about them taking away my choice to decline purchasing an open box item.

    10. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

      When I purchase something that is advertised as "New" I expect it to BE new

      You do realize the clothes you buy may even have been tried on by someone else, right?

      Do they lose their "new" status too? Or do you after trying on a jacket, demand that they bring you one that no else has tried on?

      By opening these boxes and removing whatever the fuck they want, are these games even allowed to be called "new" anymore?

      If they opened printer boxes, dropped a usb cable inside, and slapped a sticker that said "USB cable included" on the front you would be deeply offended?

      If a game is not still factory sealed...

      And this is important why?

      I'm going to demand it be sold at the used price point, as this is essentially now an "open box" item.

      Yes, it is essentially an "open box" item. That doesn't make it the same as a "used" item.

      You can demand whatever you like, but they'll probably just ask you to leave the store. You have no legal right to dictate that they sell open box items for a particular price. They can sell any item in the store for any price. They don't legally have to give discounts for open box items, or even for used items.

      If a game is not still factory sealed... And this is important why? ( CD KEY stealing, anyone??? )

    11. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Rinnon · · Score: 1

      when I DO need to buy a "new" game from them... I'm going to start insisting that they only give me sealed boxes.

      They have resealing machines. You can't count on a sealed game to be "new" at GameStop.

      Aw nuts. Guess I'll just not shop there at all.

    12. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      Although the CD key can be sealed inside the package. This was common for a while. You opened the box, and there was a manual, and a further shrink-wrapped case which contained the disk and the CDKey.

      With the recent switch to those fat dvd cases though, I agree its a potential problem again. Although selling games with CD keys that habitually don't work is a fast track to not selling any games at all.

    13. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      So, you are one of the idi... ahem people who think that shrink wrap = new?

      I have bad news for you. Most retail shops have a shrink wrapping machine in the back, specifically for reality challenged people who believe that shrink wrap = new. This includes essentially all retail shops, no matter the product sold.

      There is only one thing that can assure you that product is in the same packaging as it left the factory, and that is factory seals. However for practical reasons, only some extremely expensive hardware is packaged like that in consumer world. The rest of retail not only grants, but assumes that retailer will open packages if they feel they need, to.
      And even laws across the planet quite universally state that product that retailer opened and re-sealed without using it is in fact eligible to be sold as new (when such thing is specified in legislation). Because it is new. It has not been used. And it would be massively impractical to force retailers to send every product that looks suspicious or doesn't match exact contents instead of just ensuring that retailer can fix the problem himself and re-seal the product.

      Our retail chain is one of the most efficient things in the world. It's very much stress-tested to the limit, and there are very sane and logical reasons why it works the way it does. Specifically it works the way it does to make sure that YOU, the customer pay LESS. Because you're the one responsible for paying overhead in the end.

    14. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      If you find a retailer that doesn't have a resealing machine, let the world know. Ad would be "the dumbest retail shop of last half a century.

      Resealing machine is standard equipment in any retail shop, from electronics to food stores.

    15. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      . An unopened box has more long term value to me (and most collectors) than an open box item

      Only if you don't plan on opening the box.

      In which case the contents therein aren't terribly relevant to you except in an abstract sense. Fundamentally, you can't miss the coupon if you don't know its not there.

      See price of older games that are new unused vs. used copies of those games.

      That usually a case of wanting the manual, and so forth to be in excellent condition. "New unused" implies excellent condition of the contents, while "used" is a gamut from "you couldn't tell it wasn't new" to "The manual is missing, the CD is scratched, and the CD case is full of peanut butter".

      There are a few actual collectors, who just want "NIB" mint condition for its own sake. But these people are in the minority. This isn't , for example, star wars figures where you can at least see the contents of the package without opening it.

      I love me that new game smell.

      All that said, I do agree with you on the point that if they are opening the boxes, it should be disclosed.

    16. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      All retailers in the USA/Europe have taken this right away from you ages ago. In fact, you NEVER HAD THIS RIGHT.

      But internet groupthink tends to breed rather silly claims as facts when they get parroted by sufficient amount of ignorant people.

      You're most likely confusing the right of "unsealed box" with the right to an "unused product". These are very different animals.

    17. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Cd-key theft is a crime. Retail suffers quite badly from employee stealing, and not just in game industry.

      That said, I know of at least one case when CD key of a friend of mine was stolen by someone in retail chain, and he got another copy from the store. Of course, he was a regular customer, and came with the game in about an hour after purchase.

    18. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Adding a bonus item as some kind of promotion is fine, although most shops would just tape it to the box, or have the checkout staff hand it over when putting it through. No need to open the packaging, here they are removing an item. Best to ban selling of items in a different condition to how it comes from the manufacturer then one wouldn't need separate laws for things like if selling food or medicine and I opened the boxes and added say cyanide.

    19. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize the clothes you buy may even have been tried on by someone else, right?

      No offence, but that's a really fucking stupid comparison. If there's a jacket on the rail you can see if the store has removed one of the zips or a button and then choose not to buy it. There's also a reasonable expectation that people will have tried it on. How common is it for customers to bring their laptop into Gamestop, remove game DVDs from the boxes, install games and then try them out before putting them back in the box? (Hint: This never happens.)

      If they opened printer boxes, dropped a usb cable inside, and slapped a sticker that said "USB cable included" on the front you would be deeply offended?

      This, again, is a stupid comparison. This is the exact opposite of the case at hand. A valid comparison would be: HP included a voucher for a free black toner cartridge with one of their printers, redeemable online through a competitor's store and the store opened the box and removed it without telling customers that the product had been tampered with.

      If a game is not still factory sealed...

      And this is important why?

      Have you ever bought a game/software product from a retailer? They usually come on CDs or DVDs. These get scratched. They include CD-keys to register the game and, increasingly, duped keys mean you may not be able to play online. If the box is open, there is no guarantee that someone hasn't used that CD key. And lastly, if the box is open, there's no way of knowing what the retailer may have removed from the box. That last one is interesting, because it's exactly what is happening in this case.

      Yes, it is essentially an "open box" item. That doesn't make it the same as a "used" item.

      You can demand whatever you like, but they'll probably just ask you to leave the store. You have no legal right to dictate that they sell open box items for a particular price. They can sell any item in the store for any price. They don't legally have to give discounts for open box items, or even for used items.

      You know what? You're absolutely right! They can. They don't legally have to give discounts for anything. They could even charge more for used items if they wanted. But should they be able to sell a used item as new? No. Should they be able to open up a product, remove whatever they like and then sell it as new? No. Do you think it would be a-OK if they opened the box and removed the manual if it included an advertisement for a competing on-line service? Or maybe just cut out the ad with scissors?

    20. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that this is what will be the crux of the class-action...it's easy to get derailed because of the nature of the coupon, but it's irrelevant - the crime was in representing the product as "new". "New" is interpreted by a reasonable person as "reasonably unaltered since manufacture", and this definitely breaks that criteria. Imagine, alternately, that they'd removed the instruction booklet...

      What makes this even worse for them is that this standard is the basis for their not accepting opened returns. Not that this is an unreasonable standard - but it will make it impossible for their counsel to argue against this standard.

      If this were an isolated incident with an otherwise reputable company, that would be one thing, but Gamestop has had a lot of trouble in the past few years. This may well be the opening that a company-killing competitor needs.

      All sanctimony aside, I'll bet dollars to donuts that this was a decision made by a mid-level executive and not something that anyone with any sense would have made.

    21. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Not claiming I have a right to it. Just saying that I will always chose to shop at places that are honest about this type of thing over places that aren't as soon as I find out that they are not honest about it. (Like as soon as I get home and inspect the product or even in the store upon inspection of the product)

    22. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a heads up, they re-seal them. Also, good luck trying to convince them you'll only pay open-box, previously used prices. And they will try to claim it's never been opened, or failing that sidestep the question.

      One way or another, if it's been to gamestop, it's been opened.

    23. Re:Can it even still be considered new? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure the dollar store I worked at didn't have a resealing machine. At that level I think they just throw things away if they're not visibly fit for reselling. Nor did the bookstore, but most books aren't sealed anyway.

  12. This is why I won't shop GameStop by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 4, Informative

    True story. I went to Gamestop once to pick up Dragon Age: Origins. I'd seen the DLC advertised with a new copy, and that sounded like a good deal. The clerk offered me a used copy for slightly below the $60 asking price. I specified I wanted a new copy for the DLC, so he took the box out from behind the counter, I paid for it and left.

    I got the game home, opened it, and there was no code for DLC included. Then I noticed the game had been unsealed and re-wrapped. I took it back to the store, presented the receipt and said, "Hey, you sold me a used game at full retail." The guy tried to backpedal, saying it was a new copy that had been opened for display purposes, and maybe someone had stolen the DLC code. It was late, so at that point I offered to take the used copy he'd previously offered if he gave me the right price for it. He then said that was the only copy they had (though he'd previously tried to sell me on a used copy before presenting me with the "new" one). He hastily provided me with a full refund.

    Then I went to a competitor's store nearby, where I found a new (i.e. sealed) copy for $40, DLC included. I have not set foot inside a GameStop since. My definition of a "new game" is one that's gone from the factory to my hands without the contents of the box seeing daylight. GameStop, it seems, has other ideas.

    1. Re:This is why I won't shop GameStop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you completely. This is pretty much either blatant theft or defrauding the consumer.

    2. Re:This is why I won't shop GameStop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Glad you mentioned this. I got a "new" copy of Dragon Age Ultimate edition that was supposed to have a code for all of DLC. I assumed that in my rush to install and play I lost the coupon code sheet, although I don't see how.
      Can I say for certain that GameStop removed the sheet? No. But it's likely enough that I can now stop kicking myself over it now.
      But it did piss me off so bad that I soured on Dragon Age 2 and still haven't bought it.

    3. Re:This is why I won't shop GameStop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once purchased a new DS game with a used DS when they first came out from them. So at the time I thought maybe the saves were on the DS. after buying a new used DS years later, that had hotting bits and grease in it, I discovered I had been hosed on both occasions.

    4. Re:This is why I won't shop GameStop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way back, I bought a game that required registration of the CD Key before playing online. The key was already registered. Brought it back and I got a "oh, someone must have opened it to test it". You opened it, registered the key, and then repackaged it? What the hell?

    5. Re:This is why I won't shop GameStop by djp928 · · Score: 1

      That happened to me when I bought my first copy of World of Warcraft. Someone had opened the box and registered the key already. I called Blizzard and they refused to help me, said it was a retail issue and I needed to take the game back to where I'd bought it and get an exchange. Of course, when I took it back to Best Buy, they said they don't do refunds/exchanges for opened WoW boxes BECAUSE I MIGHT HAVE STOLEN THE KEY and am just trying to get a free copy! It took me forever to convince them that somebody had ALREADY stolen the damn key (quite possibly one of their employees, even.)

  13. Gamestop, worst ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not surprised. Gamestop is a company without even the hint of decency. I stopped shopping there years ago. Ripoff trade-ins, irritating salesmen- no, I don't to preorder a game that's two year away asshole, inconsistent pricing, and worst of all- selling games as new after the employees opened them, played them, then put them back on the shelf. That's a used game, not a new game.

  14. How am I not surprised? by CoderJoe · · Score: 1

    I've not purchased new games from GameStop in quite some time, however I have heard from a couple other people that they open every new copy and keep the CD or DVD behind the counter as an "anti-theft" measure. (There is no incentive to shoplift, as there is no media and/or key in the box.) At least one of the people I have heard this from complained to someone at id Software, with the concern over unscrupulous employees making copies of the keys to use themselves or sell.

  15. Re:Does anyone else smell that? That smell... by The+Dawn+Of+Time · · Score: 2

    I've got a better crystal ball - this is a tempest in a teapot, gamers will bitch and moan and do nothing about it, and life will go on. No lawsuit. No reckoning. Nothing.

  16. Re:Does anyone else smell that? That smell... by jmauro · · Score: 1

    My guess is that Square will sue not the gamers. They likely have contracts on what can be done to their product while it is in the hands of Gamestop before it's sold to the end customer.

  17. Re:First! by Captain+Spam · · Score: 0

    Because they thought they wouldn't get caught?

    --
    Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  18. The legal ramifications, in a different article by Hahnsoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Wired article on this does a more balanced job at handling the legal ramifications:
    http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2011/08/gamestop-onlive/

    Basically, Gamestop may be in the right, legally, if Square-Enix has a pre-existing contract with them with a non-compete clause. As the article states: “Existing contracts between GameStop and Square may have barred this kind of promotion, and so GameStop may actually be justified in their action if Square is in breach of some promotion/marketing agreement”

    But they can also be in legal trouble over this, as the article also points out, for a number of different reasons.

    Nowhere on the packaging does it say "Free OnLive coupon", apparently. I haven't looked at the packaging myself.

    1. Re:The legal ramifications, in a different article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question One: does Gamestop have a standing non-compete agreement with Square-Enix?
      Question Two: if they do have an active non-compete agreement, are they any less of a douchebag outfit for opening brand-new packages, changing the contents, then repackaging the product and selling it as an untouched new-from-the-factory product?

      IMHO, what Gamestop is doing would be like a sportscar dealership taking each sports car out on a racetrack, doing multiple high-speed laps and then cookies in the parking lot, then selling the car as brand new. It may all be legal, but it's unprofessional and reprehensible at best.

    2. Re:The legal ramifications, in a different article by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      no, but it does say it clearly on some other advertising material like the press release for the games release on the square enix website.

    3. Re:The legal ramifications, in a different article by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      I'm certain that they're protected against legal action from the developer. That's not the problem.

      The problem is that Gamestop falsely warranted product as new, i.e., reasonably unaltered from point of manufacture, that they had knowingly altered in a fashion which adversely affected its value. Ever wondered about those "Don't remove under penalty of law" tags on mattresses? That's what they're there for - so that someone cannot warrant a product as being something that it's not.
      ,br /> The penalty will come from a class-action suit from customers...I doubt that it will be significant monetarily, but it may well kill the company in terms of what it does to the public's perception. They've chosen a big title to make a terrible mistake in bad economic times at the worst possible news-cycle time (late summer), after a series of PR bungles over the past few years. Nothing short of firing the people involved and issuing a profound mea culpa will fix it. This, of course, will not happen.

      Oh, and good luck with that new online service...you've given it a hell of a launch story.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    4. Re:The legal ramifications, in a different article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because they had a contract with some other company to do it, doesn't mean it's legal. I can contract you to kill my wife, that doesn't make it legal to do so.

  19. Open box/Scratch & Dent price? by slick50 · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I can get an Open box/Scratch & Dent price?

    1. Re:Open box/Scratch & Dent price? by Desler · · Score: 1

      You mean the price where they knock off 5 bucks at most?

  20. Gamestop been doing it for a long time by Xian97 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I quit shopping at Gamestop because they opened many of their boxes. Since they are selling new games along with used for consoles, how do you know which you will end up with? Case in point, I purchased a Nintendo DS game for my daughter. Christmas Day when she opened it up and put it in her DS there were saved games on it already - it had obviously been used. When I bought it, I mentioned that the box was not sealed, and they claimed that they had to do that else they would get shoplifted. I replied that other stores have less employees in the store but don't have their games opened and behind the counter.

    Another time in a different Gamestop my son bought the PS2 game Devil May Cry, again the package was open and the had the discs behind the counter. A few days later while playing it asks him to insert Disc 2, which was not in the box. We went back to the store and they still had the 2nd disc.

    In both cases they made good, but after those experiences they lost me as a customer, and I had been shopping there nearly every week since they were Babbages. It sounds like they have still haven't learned not to open packages.

    In this case it's even worse - don't they have to break the security seal to get the coupon? In the old days they could just re-shrink wrap it, these days most games come with a security seal as well.

    1. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by captjc · · Score: 1

      I shall throw my hat into the ring as well. There are two Star Wars games in the Starfighter series, Starfighter and the sequel Jedi Starfighter. Having playing the first, I decided to buy the second during a used game sale at GameStop. I got home, only to find that they have given me the first game instead. It would have just been a simple misunderstanding but the douche-bag at the counted decided to give me a hard time about it, including repeatedly asking the question, "what's the difference?" Eventually we had to get the manager involved.

      Another time, I decided to buy a copy of The X-Files: Resist or Serve. I picked up a used copy for ~$15. When I got up to the counter, the guy pushed the new copy and upon seeing the price, gave it to me. The new copy was $5 cheaper than the used one! One would think that new games would be worth more than a used ones.

      Also, on many occasions, they don't really care if the disc (or game) is new or used. I have picked up used games with nearly pristine discs and new ones with look like they have been in an accident with a belt sander. Some clerks will pick the first disc they see, some nicer ones will find the one that looks the best (especially when there are only a few) No disc is seems tied to a specific copy. If it is, I have never seen it enforced. It becomes especially funny (or questionable) when two nearly identical copies have different prices.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    2. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      I didn't think of it much until I started reading about other user comments.

      I do recall them clearly selling me an unsealed box. The games worked fine but, you would basically go to the counter with the empty game box or would ask them for the game. They'd pull out another proper box, take the disc and manual from behind the counter and stick a sticker on it to "seal" the box.

      When I questionned them on the practice, they would say its perfectly fine, brand new copy.

      So I'm going to buy a PS3 on the weekend. Guess which store I'm not going to buy the system and a few games from?

    3. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by mysidia · · Score: 1

      In this case it's even worse - don't they have to break the security seal to get the coupon? In the old days they could just re-shrink wrap it, these days most games come with a security seal as well.

      What square needs to do is invent an outer package that cannot be resealed without obvious signs of tampering; some kind of "permanently" welded clamshell that can be open only by cutting or tearing the plastic.

      Maybe something that changes color once the seal is broken and the interior is exposed to air.

    4. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by Corngood · · Score: 1

      Every xbox game I've bought has come with a seal from the factory (with MS logo and stuff) along the edge of the clamshell. Unfortunately most people probably (a) don't know about it, (b) don't care, or (c) take their word that it's still new and they are only protecting themselves from theft.

      I like your idea of a more permanent indication of the seal being removed, but GS/EB would probably just put a big sticker over it saying 'new game, really, but don't forget to buy our new game insurance for only $4.99!'.

    5. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've done this since the early 90's, back when I worked at a Software Etc. It was sort of justified back then, because there wasn't the mass of reviews readily available on the Internet for every damn game. We abused the hell out of the policy, though. Console games were inventoried nightly, but PC games - hell, as long as we had them back by inventory.

    6. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      So I'm going to buy a PS3 on the weekend. Guess which store I'm not going to buy the system and a few games from?

      I've been looking at PS3s and PS2s as well... it looks like your best bet is to go to Gamestop only for used games... you might luck out and get a new copy instead of a used one. Otherwise, if you want a new game, don't go there because you might hit the craps and not get an actual new copy... basically, I would say, treat everything in their store like it's used, because they don't particularly seem to have the rigor to keep track of this stuff.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    7. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by TaliesinWI · · Score: 1

      Even when it was Babbage's we opened the display copy of a given console game, and when we'd sell that copy (which was rare unless we were trying to sell through a discontinued item) we'd seal it in shrink wrap and tell the customer, but still treat it as new. (Babbage's didn't deal in used games until after I left in '94 or so, so we really didn't have a provision for discounting like that). The other copies of the game were in their full boxes behind the counter. Customers were generally OK with that, because it's not like the carts were being heavily pounded on before they were sold, and 95 times out of 100 if you were buying a game it was the brand new copy anyway, at least if you were buying a game for a current system.

      If we wanted to try a game we had to use the copy that was already opened, and we had to be on the ball about not saving anything to the carts, not that that was generally a problem (this was back in the days where you generally typed in a code to get back to a given point in the game.)

      For PC games, we could take them home for demo and re-shrink them to our hearts' content, with two exceptions: 1) if the box had a security seal, or 2) if the disks came in a sealed envelope inside the box. Then it was hands off. Returned games were re-shrinked and sold as new, unless they had one of the aforementioned security seals (or the materials had visible wear or something was missing), then it was returned to the manufacturer. Babbage's had such a liberal return policy at the time this was pretty much the only real way they wouldn't completely lose their shirt on returns - you could buy a $50 game, wait a few months, bring it back with the receipt, and get the $50 back, even though by then it was $15 or $10 and we were putting it back on the shelf at that price.

    8. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I like your idea of a more permanent indication of the seal being removed, but GS/EB would probably just put a big sticker over it saying 'new game, really,

      Dang.... well, you need something to attach the sticker to.

      I'm thinking along the lines of a transparent clamshell, that when first open, some text appears all over it... saying something like: "This package has been opened", "Used product", "Not to be sold", etc

    9. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

      Same experience. I bought the first Wii Trauma Center game used and ended up getting the second. Not that I knew, but I was more than a little confused. That also marks the last time I buy a game on impulse without a bit of research first.

      --
      My UID is prime... is yours?
    10. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sold me a demo disc instead of the used game. I suspect this was employee idiocy, though. ;)

    11. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The person working at the GameStop where I bought my copy of Deus Ex (on a whim) told me she had opened it to check for the "DLC codes". The bright shiny packaging overrode my "something is wrong here" feeling. I don't care that much about the OnLive copy, its more the fact that they lied to my face about. I never usually buy product from them because of the horror stores I've heard and now I never will again for certain.
       
      I hope all the bad press and most likely lawsuits are worth it, because the amount of money they could have lost with the OnLive codes will most likely pale in comparison to what they lost in good will and future sales.

    12. Re:Gamestop been doing it for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In both cases they made good

      Did they also reimburse you for fuel to get to the store a second time when you shouldn't have had? What about your valuable time? Unless they gave you some additional product to compensate you for loss (and you did suffer some loss as a result), then how did they really make good? Perhaps they should have paid you ten or more in cash for fuel and another twenty or more for your hour or so of time to get there and back home.

  21. Re:Does anyone else smell that? That smell... by Desler · · Score: 1

    They likely have contracts on what can be done to their product while it is in the hands of Gamestop before it's sold to the end customer.

    Doubtful. GameStop owns the product at that point and can do with it as they want. Anyone who is surprised by this news that GameStop opens these packages before selling them is apparently rather clueless because this is something they've done for years. Back in 2009 there was a big hullabaloo over it as well with a supposed FTC investigation but as you can see, nothing happened.

  22. No more Gamestop purchases by brucek2 · · Score: 1

    I don't see the gray area here. Imagine if they had removed the other collector's edition content so they could keep it for themselves, yet still sold it at full price as the collector's edition. It may be legal for them to take the content while they own it, but reselling it without disclosure after modifying it has to be fraud.

    Plus you really have to wonder, if a retailer is willing to screw you over this way, what else are they willing to do to you?

    Fortunately there are dozens of choices for who to buy games from. There's no hardship to removing Gamestop from the list.

  23. Steam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    49.99. Stores are so 2004.

    1. Re:Steam by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Well, Steam is OK, However, I recently bought Civ 5 on Steam, and after purchase a second EULA came up that basically said "Oh BTW by running this software, we can take your contact/friends list from your computer and publish it on our website"

      Steam support did give me store credit as a one time gesture, but said as a policy they don't do refunds, even thought the EULA appearing in the Steam UI said something like "Contact your retailer for a refund if..."

      Unfortunetly I didn't save the text of the EULA

  24. Do people still shop there? by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    If so, why? The few times I've gone in there ( "well, it's been a while, they have to have gotten better" ), I have left disappointed.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:Do people still shop there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nostalgia. You as you inadvertently find yourself in the area, you remember the good times, the good games, you picked up there. Yeah, they became this crazy, chintzy, greedy fuck but what kind of person would you be if you only held onto that poor image of them forever. You think that as a good human being, they deserve a chance reverse that reputation. Wandering inside, you wonder where the PC gaming section is and lift empty boxes from the shelves with disbelief. Has it really done nothing to better itself? One of salestards with the polo shirt and nametag wrapped around his neck notices you, pausing his game for a second to make eye contact, then resumes. You find the PC games tucked away in the back, two rows of mostly shitty games on the wire racking.

      You hurry out before anyone approaches you.

    2. Re:Do people still shop there? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Went there once. I don't remember if I bought anything. I was obvious though that they were selling new games for the same or higher price as competitors (or at least games that they implied were new) and that their used games were selling at nearly full price. There was no point. If I want a used game I want to play a used game price for it. I like digging through the bargain bins and seeing previously used games selling for $4.99 or $9.99. I do not ever want to pay $55 for a used game. I don't know how they stay in business since even the most clueless kid can tell that it's a ripoff. Maybe the fact that that they're the only retail game chain around and likely the only one you will find in a mall?

  25. A Shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a shame. GameStop is a provider not a creator. They sell the products created by another party. They are a middleman between the creator and consumer (and certainly not the only one). They have stolen from the both production team and the gamers who purchased this product (be it legal or otherwise). Both should be outraged! This action is out of bounds and will, and should, lose them a great deal of credibility in the gaming market. I am looking forward to purchasing this game, but it will not be from GameStop. I will not be purchasing future games from them either.

  26. Hmmm by madenglishbloke · · Score: 1

    Manufacturers never include coupons like this out of the goodness of their hearts (not that many of them have hearts!) - its entirely likely that these coupons have been paid for by OnLive as a promotional thing (They pay the game maker, who make money without doing anything, people redeem the vouchers, and a percentage carry on paying for the service - everyone profits.) In this case - wouldn't GameStop be defrauding OnLive of potential revenue they have paid for?

    1. Re:Hmmm by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      In that case, square would be likely defrauding gamestop by violating likely non-competition clauses of their retail agreement. Onlive pays square, not gamespot, and gamespot is under no obligations to provide advertisement for third party, especially if second party that delivers the product failed to mention this to them.

      If these are the fact, that fault lies squarely with square (pun intended).

    2. Re:Hmmm by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Unless the non-compete agreement specifically notes streaming game services, Square will have the upper hand in their tort. You don't buy games from onlive, you rent server time. It's more like remotely dialing into a server cafe than buying an games.

    3. Re:Hmmm by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      It most likely notes "online services", which fully covers onlive.

  27. no longer new by Libertarian001 · · Score: 0

    Original contents as provided by the manufacturer are now missing? By definition this is now a used game.

  28. First Sale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one mentioned the first sale doctrine in the entire thread here. Obviously no one that has owned a business that buys merchandise wholesale and sells it retail cared to comment.

    Unless they have an agreement that says otherwise they can do anything they want with merchandise they purchase before they resell it.

    1. Re:First Sale by Toonol · · Score: 1

      That's not exactly correct. There is a difference between purchasing product for resale, and purchasing product and then reselling it. The former case is what retailers generally do, and it can be taxed differently, and is tracked differently for accounting purposes. I doubt Gamestop is paying sales tax on the games they're selling. They aren't the recipients of the 'first sale' in the sense the customer is.

  29. Gamestop does this with most new games by Sarusa · · Score: 1

    The stealing codes is semi-new. But opening the box and storing the disks somewhere else is something they've done for years.

    The employees will even take the games home and play them, then they'll sell the games to you as 'new'. Except when activation codes don't allow that.

    1. Re:Gamestop does this with most new games by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      That's illegal pretty much everywhere, as it would qualify as selling used product as new.

      As an example, here in Finland we have a very strong consumer protection, so we're allowed by law to get a product in the mail (in case of webshopping where you can't check the product in the shop), take it out of the box and inspect it, and then return it if we don't like it. The only requirements are that product is not used (i.e. bought TV hasn't been plugged in - you can take it out and see if it fits your wall for example so long as you don't leave visible marks on it, or plug it in and start using it) and that all contents of original box are packaged and included, also unused.

      The shop has a right to reseal such a product and sell it again as new, as it is not used.

  30. Someone should sue them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And claim they want another game in compensation for the theft.

    When asked what game they want, I think i'd pay a grand to see the face of gamestop's staff when they say:

    "do you have battletoads?"

    1. Re:Someone should sue them by verbatim · · Score: 1

      Sue for what?

      If they re-sealed the box and represented it as unopened, I can see the case. But if you willingly purchase an opened box and expect the contents of the box to be unmolested then you've got a screw loose somewhere.

      --
      Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
    2. Re:Someone should sue them by Riceballsan · · Score: 1

      They are clearly selling the games as new. I don't think they are re-shrink wrapping them, but they do leave the tag as "new"

  31. Any lawyers reading? by Caerdwyn · · Score: 1

    Are there any lawyers (as in, licensed to practice law) who are gamers who are reading this willing to take this one pro-bono?

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
    1. Re:Any lawyers reading? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      Are there any lawyers (as in, licensed to practice law) who are gamers who are reading this willing to take this one pro-bono?

      Only if they're idiots.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    2. Re:Any lawyers reading? by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Well, not necessarily, pro-bono or cheap for someone like the EFF on a nice high profile case is a great way to increase ones own profile.

    3. Re:Any lawyers reading? by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 1

      I actually meant that the case would have no merit. In order to win you would have to prove harm. It would be extraordinarily hard to prove that not delivering a product or service that was never actually promised to the customer has caused any harm whatsoever. It's like suing Ben & Jerry's because they didn't decide to give out free PinkBerry when you were there last Thursday.

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    4. Re:Any lawyers reading? by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      It was promised on Square Enix' press release on their website.

  32. Gamestop blows by Tridus · · Score: 1

    Legal or not, this is pretty clearly poor practice for the customer and rather shady. But it's nothing new. Gamestop is little more then a pawn shop these days anyway. Their PC selection has been so pathetic for years that I'm surprised they even sell this game.

    I stopped going there years ago when I went to buy a game and was instead lectured about how I should pre-order. I then walked across the street to a big box store and bought it without the lecture. This is a terrible company and as soon as their pawn shop business is taken away by the console makers they will go under. Can't say I'll miss them in the slightest.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  33. Ridiculous by netdigger · · Score: 1

    Its pretty easy to get any computer software. Dues ex is already on torrents. The Key is what you have to pay for. Someone has opened the package and scene the key.

    Now I get home and try to install and find my key has already been used. I call up Square Enix and tell them that i bought it at game stop. I think that gamestop will have a few irate customers and a pissed off manufacture

  34. Re:First! by _KiTA_ · · Score: 0

    ok so - why would they want to do this again - especially when Square didn't give them that authority..

    The coupon was for a digital download of the game via OnLive, or something similar -- Gamestop has a vested interest in killing off and preventing the rise of digital distribution.

  35. Re:First! by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Troll

    People still buy things at Gamestop? Oh yeah wait, console people. Hahahaha, couldn't happen to a nicer bunch. What are you complaining about? This is all being done to protect you from nasty pirates, right? Enjoy the taste of someone else's distribution channel. After all, you are paying for this.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  36. Just entered my local gamestop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got back from Gamestop and asked if they had any boxed copies that wasn't victimized by removing the coupon. The guy over the counter said he had no idea what I was talking about. It was extremely apparent the boxes had been opened however. Either he really had no idea as someone else did it (quite possible) or he was lying to my face.

    More reasons not to buy from Gamestop. Regardless if I would want the coupon or not, essentially stealing from their customers by way of taking things we should be getting is just dirty. I don't care for the reasoning that "It's theirs before it's mine." They're a store, they should simply be the middleman to a sale. I should be getting the experience that the game developer and publisher is offering, not what Gamestop wants me to have. Not that Gamestop is above doing dirty things, seeing as they love to sell used games new. They're still doing that too. My girlfriend got a "New" DS game with a save already on it several months back.

    1. Re:Just entered my local gamestop. by netdigger · · Score: 1

      Thank you for doing that. I was considering doing that myself just to see.

  37. Re:First! by JustSomeProgrammer · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is PC copies of the game.

  38. Whatever... by verbatim · · Score: 1

    *shrug*

    This doesn't bother me at all.

    Unless they are re-sealing the boxes and are representing them as unopened, I don't see the problem.

    Caveat emptor used to mean something.

    --
    Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
    1. Re:Whatever... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're representing the package as *complete*. That's the problem. Caveat emptor doesn't mean "buyer beware" as in "sucks to be you if you're victim of fraud", it means "buyer beware", as in "if the deal seems too good to be true, it probably is". The "deal" in this case is a supposedly complete copy of a prepackaged good at the normal (MSRP/RRP) price.

  39. Re:Does anyone else smell that? That smell... by Toonol · · Score: 1

    I could see a lawyer getting involved. Class action suit. End result being every Gamestop buyer of the game gets a new coupon mailed to them, and the lawyer gets a half million. There are strong incentives for lawyers to file class actions suits.

    I think this has a reasonable chance, because Gamestop is selling something which doesn't match reasonable expectations. If asked, the manufacturer, and any other vendor, would tell you this had a coupon in it. Gamestop is getting rid of it without notice. Would it be ok if they ditched the manual? Obviously not.

  40. Goodbye Gamestop by TooMad · · Score: 1

    Instant satisfaction is nice and all but we're done. I sent a nice to their customer service with a "before" jpg, my new power up card, which I was thinking of getting the "elite" version for. Then the new "after" one, shredded.

  41. Confirmed, sneaky bastards by Latinhypercube · · Score: 0

    I though it was weird that the box was opened ! I quizzed the store employee and he assured me everything was in there. LYING BASTARDS ! They just lost my business (i bought all my games there)

  42. Re:First! by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    People still buy things at Gamestop? Oh yeah wait, console people. Hahahaha, couldn't happen to a nicer bunch. What are you complaining about? This is all being done to protect you from nasty pirates, right? Enjoy the taste of someone else's distribution channel. After all, you are paying for this.

    RTFA, even the summary before you spout off elitist crap and show us all what an intelligent bunch PC gamers are.

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  43. Returns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If their return policy prohibits returning software after opening the box, why should I expect to pay full price for a product I don't even have the option of returning?

    1. Re:Returns by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      So you pirate all your software?

    2. Re:Returns by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      I've gotten Best buy to refund my money for a game, but that was because X3:Reunion had one of the nastier versions of Starforce on it. Pre-installation, WoW and TF2 ran flawlessly, post-installation they both lagged and skipped like an advanced Parkinsons patient playing hopscotch. Put up enough of a stink about how they're selling a product that wasn't advertised as having said software and they gave me my money back.

    3. Re:Returns by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I think returning a "defective" product pretty much covers the "no returns on software" policy, when you have a crippleware like starforce bundled with it. But we were talking about exchanging software that doesn't break machines.

  44. Re:First! by Dunbal · · Score: 2

    Then I go back to my opening statement - people still buy things at Gamestop? I don't own a console and honestly after giving up 3 years ago because all the Gamestops in my neighborhood only stocked console games (or a very limited selection of used PC titles), I vowed never to buy a game again from a brick and mortar store. Guess what - I don't have any problems using Gamersgate or better yet buying directly from the publisher and downloading. It saves me a drive and it helps keep a useless store clerk job out of the economy.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  45. Thanks for the heads-up on OnLive, Gamestop by paramour · · Score: 1

    I don't really game much anymore and so don't follow gaming news., but Deus Ex was an old favorite and I've thought about getting the new iteration. Good job Gamestop, your tactics made it made it to slashdot and my radar, introducing me to OnLive, something I hadn't heard of (or had and mistook it for a branding of Microsoft Live). Although I wonder how well it will actually work for me it seemed worthwhile enough to at least download the free client and watch some games in progress -- on a Mac where Deus Ex sn't otherwise available at that.

    Not quite the Streisand Effect, but mostly because few here are as clueless about OnLive as I was. Gamestop, you don't yet seem to understand that every company memo is a public document these days.

  46. Bad Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess i won't be going to GameStop anymore. I hope they go out of business!

  47. Re:First! by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    OnLive allows one to stream and play a game running on there servers. This way you don't need high powered hardware and can play on virtually any device (as long s there is a client).

  48. Re:First! by monkyyy · · Score: 1

    one troll doesn't define a group

    --
    warning pointless sig
  49. The real funny part by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    The PC Retail version is activated against a steam account just as if one went and bought half-life 2, counterstrike source, portal, cod: mw2... in a shop. So, all they've done is limited the use of one of 2 digital distribution methods included. This also begs the question though, why don't they give onlive codes to those of us who bought it on steam directly, or steam codes to those that bought it on onlive directly?

    1. Re:The real funny part by oh-dark-thirty · · Score: 1

      The really really funny part is that this OnLive coupon appears to have been included only in copies shipped to GameStop, and as far as I know can't be found in any other retail version.

  50. Re:Does anyone else smell that? That smell... by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    Square Enix should have printed the code on the manuals!

  51. Re:Does anyone else smell that? That smell... by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    Or the disc itself

  52. A monopoly? By what standard? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I've never bought games at Gamestop. Locally here I can get games at Target, Walmart, and Best Buy. All of which have a lot of stores Target and Walmart have a lot more than Gamestop) so it isn't like I have to go out of my way or anything. Online, hell I've got options, options and more options. Amazon would be the big one, good service and massive selection, but Newegg would be another major choice.

    Gamestop has nothing near a monopoly.

    1. Re:A monopoly? By what standard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Amazon would be the big one, good service and massive selection, but Newegg would be another major choice.

      A couple months back I found myself needing a basic USB cable, so I went over to Best Buy to get one. They only had one type of cable in stock that matched my requirements, and the cost of it was $30. So, as much as it sucked to have to wait three days, I went home and bought one from Amazon for about $4, and the price included free shipping.

      Economics have changed so much from the glory days of Radio Shack. Insanely, it is now generally more economical to shop remotely and have shit delivered than to visit a retail store. This, despite the rising cost of fuel. Video stores are gone. Bookstores have become retro specialty shops. The chain retailers that sell electronics now seem to have to mark everything up to retarded prices.

      But, more to the topic, I haven't set foot in a GameStop since GameTap came online. You can get new games cheaper elsewhere, you can get retro games by download, and you can make more yard saleing your used games than GameStop will pay you for them.

    2. Re:A monopoly? By what standard? by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      I needed a longer HDMI cable for one of my new monitors recently, so I cycled round to the local PC shop to sett if they had one, which they didn't. Nor did they have an HDMI gender-bender so I could kludge it with the couple of shorter ones I did have at home.

      The guy in the store said "I'm looking at doing an order in the next few days, so I could get one in for you if you want?" and I'm thinking "Or, I could go home, buy it on Amazon using my Prime subscription and have it delivered tomorrow." I shall let you guess which I did. I think Amazon Prime is probably the best investment I've ever made, considering the amount of stuff I buy from them.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    3. Re:A monopoly? By what standard? by jabelli · · Score: 1

      Yes, and then the B&M stores complain that the reason they're losing business to on-line vendors is "sales tax" and if the Amazons, Neweggs and Monoprices of the world had to collect sales tax, it would "level the field."

    4. Re:A monopoly? By what standard? by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      Which is an invalid argument in the UK - and the whole of the EU - because Amazon do collect VAT on sales, where appropriate. It doesn't matter where you base yourself in the EU, you have to collect VAT when shipping to another EU country. Or EEC country. Or I forget which it technically is.

      A little ironically, this excludes their bread and butter book business, because books are zero rated for VAT (along with magazines, newspapers, charts, maps, and various other printed works). At least in the UK - VAT rates are set by the individual countries in the EU, so we can technically shop around for a low VAT rate, if we want. Although any saving will probably get wiped out by shipping.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    5. Re:A monopoly? By what standard? by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      Insanely, it is now generally more economical to shop remotely and have shit delivered than to visit a retail store. This, despite the rising cost of fuel. Video stores are gone. Bookstores have become retro specialty shops. The chain retailers that sell electronics now seem to have to mark everything up to retarded prices.

      The thing that makes it a lot less insane is that stocking a brick and mortar store costs a lot of money. Back in Radio Shack's heyday, the reason they could compete is that handling orders from a central location (over the phone, since the web wasn't around then) cost a lot of money, so only bulk orders made sense. As the ubiquity of the Internet and the ease of processing online orders has grown, the cost to do it that way has dropped by a huge amount, while the cost to stock an item on a shelf hasn't changed much. Once the majority of products carried by a store cross that cost barrier, it's no longer competitive to stock the item (that's why video stores have disappeared). As to markups, they've always been there. It's just that online retailers can undercut them because it now costs less to process it online and ship from a warehouse than to stock and track items that sit in a store (which costs money to operate as well).

      Virg

  53. I bought my copy from GameStop and it still by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    had the coupon. But my local GameStop have always been kind of loose cannons who have managed to somehow get away with not giving a shit about what corporate tells them to do.

    1. Re:I bought my copy from GameStop and it still by oh-dark-thirty · · Score: 1

      They are the Honey Badgers of GameStops.

  54. Re:First! by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

    I have to admit this puzzles me. Who the hell goes to buy new PC games at Gamestop(I will admit I bought a 'new' copy of the BGII SoA and ToB edition, but this was in 2008 when it was 12 bucks)?

  55. This practice negatively effects game collectors by nickmalthus · · Score: 1

    People who collect sealed box games like me could be held legally liable if we sell an item we believe to be unopened but later find out from the purchaser that this is not the case. Gamestop sells many special collector edition games and if they don't clarify their policy on this type of product tampering they stand to lose considerable business.

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be-T J
  56. It is fine. JUst open the box, and return it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they have a "no return box openned policy" , jsut open the box, return it, and make a TERRIBLE STINK that your coupon for online is not in it and insist to have it returned.

  57. OnLive quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried out OnLive (disclaimer: my housemate is an employee) and I thought it was pretty good. Enjoyed playing Metro 2033 on it. I think people should give it a try and decide for themselves.

    There's a free trial. http://www.onlive.com/service?autoplay=yes

  58. already opened by jlebrech · · Score: 1

    game discs and manuals are usually stored in a separate location to the box for security.

    so it would be technically opening the plastic pouch and removing the coupon.

  59. Re:First! by delinear · · Score: 1

    OP was happy enough for one troll to define the group. I play both PC and console games - I play console games not because I care about piracy or being "hax0red" but because sometimes I don't want the hassle of installations and driver incompatabilities and badly thought out DRM solutions. Hell, Steam is one of the most popular distribution channels on the PC and that's even more locked down than consoles (I can let anyone with physical access to my copy of the game play it on their account on the console, or I can choose to sell the game on - neither option is available to me under Steam, so far as I can see), so I'm really not sure what his point was.

  60. This is foolish... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    What they should have done is take the coupon out and replace it with one of their own. GameStop relies on the goodwill of their customers... this damages this good will.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  61. Yes, he does. Can you read? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the product is not a food item or medication, so there is no risk that their tampering causes bodily injury or death.. "

    I believe that, the above quote being from mysidia, that yes, they DO understand that those rules exist because "they can become fatal when opened in wrong environment".

    The question to ask now, is CAN YOU READ????

    Or was this just you LEAPING to the defence of a company because you are so in love with the taste of their collective dick, and therefore couldn't see the post over the hairy ballsack?

    1. Re:Yes, he does. Can you read? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's the exact reason why I jumped to their defence. You got me, I'm gay for gamestop in spite of having never shopped there (we didn't even have gamestops here until a few years ago when they bought out a few small shops in every city). It has nothing to do with having worked in retail in general, and knowing how and why the system works. At all!

  62. Stop Shopping @ GameStop! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I honestly can't believe we're still having this conversation. I stopped shopping there years ago, but obviously the whole "selling used goods at new prices" debacle didn't bother anyone else enough to actually make them change their behavior. I keep seeing more and more of the GameStop stores popping up all over the place, so it's the only conclusion I can draw. Stop bitching, and stop shopping there. Tell other people to stop shopping there. If they don't understand why, explain to them that they've been paying full price for used merchandise. I don't know how much simpler it could be.

  63. Re:This practice negatively effects game collector by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1

    Well...if you have been buying sealed collectible games for any amount of time you would already know to avoid Gamestop. They don't give a shit if it's collectible, special edition, if a Moogle jumps out and sings to you in Japanese. They will pocket the Moogle and charge you $20 over retail for the trouble.

    There is one, and only one, reason to buy at Gamestop: Gameboy Advance used carts are often less than on eBay after shipping is figured in. If you don't have a GBA or DS that can play GBA carts, the store is pointless.

  64. If Gamestop owns it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then how can I be in a contractual relationship with the company distributing it (the EULA)?

    And if it's owned by Gamestop, then isn't it a pre-owned game?

    Or is that statement you made complete bollocks?

  65. Re:Does anyone else smell that? That smell... by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

    If GameStop "owns the product at that point" then they can't sell it as new, only as pre-owned.

    --
    You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
  66. MOD PARENT UP! by fredan · · Score: 1

    You don't need to buy any games in a store, ever again (if you are on a pc/mac :whistle: )

  67. Gamestop employees distributing codes elsewhere? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like there may be cases of Gamestop employees distributing the free game codes elsewhere. So not only removing items from a package, but taking what is effectively a digital copy code for the same item and giving it away, creating a new copy of the item and possibly costing a Deus Ex sale. That would be pretty serious right?

    http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?589922-Gamestop-removing-OnLive-vouchers-from-Deus-Ex&p=14315880#post14315880

  68. You dont own it anyhow... by malichidemonos · · Score: 1

    This is funny... I don't see what the big deal is anyhow. Technically you don’t own the game anyhow when you do buy it. You simply own the right to use it. For anyone that is buying the PC version, they should know by now that buying a game in the store is pointless when you can just download it from such providers like Steam. As long as they don’t scratch the DVD's or crack open a collector’s edition, then who cares about a stupid coupon that you can get for free online. The only people that should be pissed is the game manufacturer due that the coupon was a sponsor and probably paid them to put it in there. However, GameStop purchased the game to sell it... So before you own the box, they own it and can do what they want with it. If anything the games manufacturer should just not do business with them for a bit or ship their product out a day later to teach them a lesson. What hurts a business more then not having the greatest product on your shelf before anyone else?

  69. I'm not insane by r3verse · · Score: 0

    I am the Store Manager at a top-tier gaming retailer in rural Australia.

    Why do we open boxes/cases? Because the disc and relevant DLC coupon/manual for an $80 game would be stolen five seconds after it was put on the shelf as shipped. Want an untouched copy? Pay the (less than normal retail, usually) price and pre-order a copy.

    I will be more than happy to look out for great games for you, advise you in spending your hard-earned dollar, and offer considerate after-sales service.

    If you want to walk in, make me price match somewhere 200km away, and never come back -- you get what you get. Which is: shut up.

  70. Not so fast there... by MarbleMunkey · · Score: 1

    so there is no risk that their tampering causes bodily injury or death..

    Oh, I don't know... It sounds like an awful lot of people on this board are upset about this, which could in an edge case cause bodily harm or death to GameStop employees..

    //not that I condone violence...

  71. What is this? Opposite day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they really want to hurt their competitor, shouldn't they be stuffing the "get something from our competitor for $0" coupons into everything they sell??

  72. Goodbye gamestop. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    I used you simply because you were convenient, the closest game retailer to my apartment.
    But if you're telling me that practices like this are A-OK in your book? Just...no. This is wrong both morally and legally.
    I'll be buying my ps3/3ds games from amazon from now on.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  73. Re:First! by monkyyy · · Score: 0

    im not op, nor do i defend his actions,

    btw console gaming sucks because the indie market is a 2nd thought

    --
    warning pointless sig
  74. Re:First! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is about the PC version, you illiterate moron.

  75. Too dumb by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    I guess they're too dumb to use a scanner and an empty DVD case.

  76. SOP by Altanar · · Score: 1

    Standard operating procedure. Gamestop even opens PC games if you can find one in their store, even the boxes that say "Not valid for sale if opened." I made the mistake of buying a PC game there once and they didn't give me the CD key card. I had to call the store when I got home, and they read it to me over the phone. Never again.

  77. Babbage's by hysterik · · Score: 1

    I used to work at Babbage's, which would later become GameStop. Policy allowed employees to "check-out" software, take it home and then come back and seal it. This was all sold as new software (Babbage's didn't sell used software or games). This gave the employees an opportunity to use the software (or games) gaining experience with it, and thus better able to work with customers. For example, knowing whether a customer would like game X or knowing if some software would be more useful than another. The last time I was in a GameStop you could hardly find the section with PC software, so I'm not really sure why this is an issue. I bought Portal 2 from them and they had to retrieve it from a back room (was not out on the shelf).

    So it wouldn't surprise me if GameStop still allows their employees to check-out software and re-seal it. In this day with pervasive DRM, I'd just avoid them all together.

  78. Re:Does anyone else smell that? That smell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or used the same authentication code that the user needs to key in to install and run the game on their computer to be the same code that is used to play it on OnLive's servers.

    Seriously people!