Slashdot Mirror


Programming Prodigy Arfa Karim Passes Away At 16

quantr writes "Arfa Karim, child prodigy, youngest certified Microsoft Professional in the world and winner of the president’s Pride of Performance, breathed her last breath on Saturday night at the Combined Military Hospital in Lahore. Arfa had an epileptic attack on December 22 and had been in a coma since."

536 comments

  1. Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it must be asshole day at /.

    1. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...it must be asshole day at /.

      +1

      Early comments are disgusting and bring shame to /.
      RIP Arfa.

    2. Re:Reading the early comments... by bonch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's every day. And they get modded up, every time. The moderation system is broken and desperately needs to be replaced with a Reddit-like system where everyone can vote.

    3. Re:Reading the early comments... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You should know more than anybody else here that controversy grabs eyeballs, illicits emotional response, and provokes people into action.

      People have the choice to browse at a high threshold so they don't even see offensive comments. This may come as a surprise to you, but perhaps a large number of Slashdot readers enjoy browsing at -1. There is a reason for that, but you'd best not think about it too hard - you might have a nervous breakdown.

    4. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, because on Reddit, only the most useful comments and articles float to the top. ...

      Hahahaa, wait, what site are we talking about?

    5. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every day is asshole day at /. Every fucking day.

    6. Re:Reading the early comments... by spyder-implee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thought so too at first, but most of the tasteless comments have been modded down pretty quickly by the rest of the community. The asshole group isn't representative of the rest of us, they just post quick.

      --
      Take what ye can. Give nothing back!
    7. Re:Reading the early comments... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sometimes comments that are insightful to some get modded down by 'politically correct' moderators who don't understand the truth is still the truth even if it might hurt someone's feelings. And then others get modded down because moderators in other countries have a language/translation issue and don't understand the point someone is making and thinks they are being rude, or they don't get a joke. These ones I usually attribute to not understanding local colloquialisms. And sometimes a combination of both. I am sure there are other reasons legitimate posts get marked down, but those are two that come to mind. And true, a lot of those mods get corrected, but not always.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    8. Re:Reading the early comments... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, and there are moderators who mark something down because they don't like the point someone is making even if it is on topic (or at least on the topic of that branch of the thread).

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    9. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The previous negative comments combined with the fact that the death is much more tragic than Steve Jobs is interesting. We obviously care very little about education, the young, and helping to improve the world. Instead we would rather only idolize the theft of ideas, rather than the creativity that gives birth to new ideas. So, it is not only sad that she has died, but it is also sad that we are unable to appreciate her contribution to computer science because of our lack of an advanced society.

    10. Re:Reading the early comments... by bonch · · Score: 0

      You obviously missed the point. The early asshole comments were initially modded up, and so browsing at a high threshold didn't filter them out. If everyone could vote, the bad moderators would be overruled by the majority.

    11. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, this is the standard treatment for women in STEM. It's why most of us leave by the time we're 25.

    12. Re:Reading the early comments... by hedwards · · Score: 1, Informative

      I've noticed that happening a lot lately, comments that aren't snarky, off topic or even wrong being modded down because some fanboy doesn't like it.

    13. Re:Reading the early comments... by bonch · · Score: 0

      I acknowledge your lack of a counterargument.

      Let us continue the current system in which a limited pool of moderators decides what should be seen by everyone else.

    14. Re:Reading the early comments... by bonch · · Score: 2

      And at the same time, shitposts get modded up. Slashdot's moderation has completely broken down in the last couple of years. Metamoderation is supposed to address this and remove bad moderators from appearing in the pool, but clearly it's not working.

    15. Re:Reading the early comments... by bonch · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure what criticism you're trying to level when the exact same criticism can be leveled at Slashdot, as the comments and articles here are user-submitted. The point is who decides what is useful--on Reddit, it's everyone. On Slashdot, it's a select pool of moderators, and so people with an agenda can wreak havoc on the discussion by filtering out legitimate posts and modding up shitposts, which happens every day.

    16. Re:Reading the early comments... by Patchw0rk+F0g · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was going to mod this thread, but I can't. I've gotta comment.

      Truth may be truth, even if it hurts someone's feelings; being an flaming, chasm-wide asshole is just that: being a flaming, chasm-wide asshole. Even if it hurts someone's feelings.

      Those top-side comments weren't intended to point out any "truths"; they were written to reflect the idiot(s)' world-view, not titillate, not provoke, not query nor question.

      Shit like that doesn't reflect on /. ... you see it everywhere. What it reflects is that there are always going to be bitter, uninformed, closed-minded tiny people in this world. I choose not to be one of them.

      Now. off to the next thread to moderate. Hopefully, all the bile and spite was delivered here, where it can collect and stew in silence.

      --
      When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. ~~ Hunter S. Thompson
    17. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's why most of us leave by the time we're 25.

      Younger and tighter, orders the boss.

    18. Re:Reading the early comments... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I don't think anybody bothers, not since that period where they made people remoderate things rather than giving a general up or down vote on the moderation. I think they've redone it since then, but at this point, I don't think anybody really bothers and I have better things to do than to notify them every time I see an egregious abuse of mod points.

    19. Re:Reading the early comments... by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh you missed the fun part of the /. mod system...what happens when you have a loonie. I have one that will wait until the article is off the front page (so no one can undo him) and mods down every. single. post. on anything I say regarding anything FOSS. Doesn't matter what the FOSS project is, doesn't matter if I say "hey its nice" he will zero out anything i post on FOSS even if it takes him 2 days worth of mod points to do so. I give him credit to dedication to his batshittiness, it took him 3 days on the Firefox article because I had 3 plus 4 posts but last I checked he managed to zero all of them out.

      The problem is /. has become infected with rabid fanbois which its no wonder the numbers are dropping. look at how on ANY article about MSFT, I don't care if its about...say some book on sharepoint server management, you'll see someone get a plus 5 for typing "use Linux" like that is some magic answer that has fuck all to do with the topic, a post that says "Google is great" or "they do no evil" will also get modded waay up, even if it has fuck all to do with the topic.

      So I agree we need to try something else, hell ANYTHING else, because too many discussions here become giant fanboi circle jerks with everyone that parrots groupthink going up, everybody that doesn't toe the line getting buried. personally I'd like it if I didn't have to wade through a bunch of "nigger faggot cocksucker" posts but I have to browse at the lowest level just to read the posts that don't follow groupthink. I'd say its worth a shot to try different ways of doing it if for no other reason so we might trip over the right way. i miss the days that we could have a 100+ comment back and forth about something like filesystems and OS designs without it quickly becoming fanboi central, but now its all militant flag waving and it doesn't really matter WHAT anybody says, just that they fall on the right side of the mod's belief system. Currently from what I've been able to gather the current "rules" are Google yay, MSFT boo, Apple yay unless its apple VS FOSS then it is Apple boo,Oracle boo, and Canonical is yay unless its unity then boo. We've ALL seen it, just as we've seen a dozen posts below them going "WTF? Who is modding this crap up?" which of course gets modded down by whomever is modding that crap up, its fanboi central here now and it didn't use to be and I hope it can not be that way again but as long as the current mod system is in place i doubt we'll see the groupthink and karma whoring go away.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    20. Re:Reading the early comments... by Nursie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You're sure it's one loonie and not a whole community of people who hate you?

      Because you are a bit of an asshole...

    21. Re:Reading the early comments... by jamesh · · Score: 2

      As much as we feel motivated to say something about the sort of crap people will post about stuff like this ("all it takes for evil to succeed" etc), they already know they're assholes, the rest of us already know they're assholes, and the reactions you and I are giving them are exactly what they were aiming for when they did it. And to boot, most of the posts here are now about their comments rather than about TFA.

      In future, just moderate them down as appropriate and say nothing more on the matter.

    22. Re:Reading the early comments... by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      It's why most of us leave by the time we're 25.

      I would have thought that generally by about that age most women would be looking at having children, and a fair chunk of women after they have a child wish to spend at least a few years looking after the thing.

    23. Re:Reading the early comments... by syousef · · Score: 2

      No, this is the standard treatment for women in STEM. It's why most of us leave by the time we're 25.

      Yeah men treat each other much better. If you are gender bashing, you are part of the problem!!!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    24. Re:Reading the early comments... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 2

      I agree on a lot of your points. I haven't really noticed the pro-fanboy modding. But I have noticed some really crazy down-modding that suggested bias, malice, or thoughtlessness on the part of the moderator. And this seems to have been on the upswing over the last 12-18 months. The current meta-modding system is apparently insufficient.

    25. Re:Reading the early comments... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1, Interesting

      you'll see someone get a plus 5 for typing "use Linux" like that is some magic answer that has fuck all to do with the topic, a post that says "Google is great" or "they do no evil" will also get modded waay up, even if it has fuck all to do with the topic.

      Sounds like the FOX News of "cool to be gnu," tech heads... who says we want to hear another perspective?

    26. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, It's boo to Canonical also, unity or not.
      The some others in the list: Microsoft, SUSE, Oracle, Apple, Novell , ....

    27. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a solution; ban everyone with a UID above 100,000. Call it the noobocaust.

    28. Re:Reading the early comments... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they were rude and a lot of modded down comments are, but I was responding to my post's parent who said he didn't understand why some people set their filter at -1 and read everything. And my response was that sometimes things modded down by others might not have been by me and might still be interesting. But yeah, the risk is reading crap as well.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    29. Re:Reading the early comments... by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      There is a solution; ban everyone with a UID above 100,000. Call it the noobocaust.

      Won't work. I do more denouncement of Microsoft and humiliating its shills here than all the n00bs combined.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    30. Re:Reading the early comments... by fnj · · Score: 1

      Good work, mods. Seriously.

    31. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but now its all militant flag waving and it doesn't really matter WHAT anybody says, just that they fall on the right side of the mod's belief system.

      That would adequately describe 95% of comments on any forum reporting any news story about damn near everything over the past few years. As I write this, someone will inevitably blame Obama for the death of Karim.

    32. Re:Reading the early comments... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Google is great

      Now mod me up. Use Linux.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    33. Re:Reading the early comments... by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I was going to argue with you, then I read the other responses to your comment. Sorry you have to put up with that.

      OTOH I don't think the sorts of assholes that rage about the intellectual credentials of a dead 16 year old are picky about gender.

    34. Re:Reading the early comments... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't meta moderate any more because they made it a pain in the ass to see the comments in context. How can I tell if a comment is fare if I can't see what the comment is replying to? Is it on topic? I don't know, I can't see what people are talking about to see. Was it insightful. I don't know... a comment about cats could be insightful but maybe not if they're talking about dogs. (I avoided a car metaphor there.) If you can't easily see the preceding comments then it is pointless to meta moderate. And the last time I tried it about a month ago, I just remember having to jump through hoops to find the parent so that I could understand the post. And sending Slash dot a suggestion or complaint doesn't get you anywhere. So fuckit, I don't bother.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    35. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is /. has become infected with rabid fanbois

      Like you for example. Your rabid pro-M$ posts and pretence that OSS and others aren't a strong alternative in many contexts is just ridiculous. You post the absolute bare minimum of non-M$ material to try and make yourself appear credible.

      It's a big world out there and your consistently blinkered and narrow view, a view that doesn't grow and is consistently mod'ed up despite the fact that it's biggoted as hell, is strongly suggestive of somebody with an agenda.

    36. Re:Reading the early comments... by NorQue · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Modded you down personally as "overrated" on said Firefox post, I still remember that I thought that your writing made it clear that you lack the technical skills to judge what you wrote about. I still remember that I wanted to write an answer to your post, but that would've undone all my previous moderation. What you posted *was* highly overrated, IMHO, so I rather modded you down instead of correcting you. Not everybody is out there to get you. You seem to be pretty vocal, though, looks like it's pretty easy to get annoyed by your posts. Don't take that as an offence, just as an outside observation.

    37. Re:Reading the early comments... by kurthr · · Score: 1

      It is really terrifying that you got modded for that, and it wasn't funny. :O

    38. Re:Reading the early comments... by gnapster · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you kidding? It was hilarious!

    39. Re:Reading the early comments... by gnapster · · Score: 2

      I don't meta moderate any more because they made it a pain in the ass to see the comments in context.

      I just open the comment in a new tab. Is that so hard?

      Disclaimer: I discovered this thread just now while metamoderating.

    40. Re:Reading the early comments... by RogueyWon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've noticed your little stalker before - he's quite impressively broken (albeit often hilariously so).

      You're right to point at some of the flaws in the mod system and the groupthink it promotes. I'd also agree with some of the specific examples you've picked. However, I'm going to play the optimist here; I think things are actually getting (slightly) better, rather than worse.

      I've been posting on this account since the end of 2003 - mostly on the games stories, but also on some of the general business/sciency ones. I used to have a little challenge I'd set myself when making posts on relevant games threads: "say something critical of Nintendo and still end up at +5". I remember one post which fluctuated several times between +5 and -1 over the course of an afternoon (eventually ending up on +4). These days, that doesn't seem like such a problem.

      Similarly with MS - five years ago, being even remotely nice about them was a 1-way ticket to modding oblivion. But then, I've had a number of posts which were fairly nice about them hit +5 uneventfully over the last few months. I've also noted a lot more modded-up posters who admit that they use Windows as their sole OS these days. Five years ago, I felt that put me in a minority on here. Not so much any more.

      That said, I guess there's another explanation here. It might not be that the nature of the slashdot community has changed, but rather that companies/products themselves have evolved and the groupthink consensus has just evolved over time to follow suit. After all, over the last few years:

      - Nintendo have upset a large portion of their hardcore fanbase by basically ignoring them through the product life of the Wii, focussing on 1-shot exercise and party games instead. They still have a few rabid fans left, but there's a big disillusioned crowd out there, which just wasn't the case 5 years ago.

      - Apple have gone from being the charming underdog to being scarily big and powerful. The effects of their walled-garden mentality are becoming more relevant and painful.

      - Microsoft haven't really done anything outright evil. They've been pretty incompetent in places (Vista, 360 RROD, anything their marketing department does), but the sense of malice you got in the 90s and early in the last decade just isn't there any more. They've also done some pretty cool things, such as Kinect.

      - And at the same time, Windows has reached the point where it is, for the most part, stable, reliable and pleasant to use. This at a time when Linux on the desktop hasn't exactly been making great strides forwards.

      I suppose there's an easy way to test this. Let's see if I can get a +5 modded post that says something nice about Sony (who seem to be the new favoured villain of choice).

    41. Re:Reading the early comments... by ajo_arctus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      because too many discussions here become giant fanboi circle jerks with everyone that parrots groupthink going up

      Every time I see the word 'fanboi' or the phrase 'circle jerk' I lose a bit of faith in the site I'm on. Stop it. Learn to use grown up words and make your point more rationally. I know you're annoyed that you have a stalker, but surely they'll get bored soon enough -- maybe now the school holidays are over. I also suspect it's a personal grudge, rather than a FOSS thing.

      As for your other point, you must understand that we all miss the good old days -- but that has been the case for thousands (if not millions) of years. Not only that, but group think is something you have to learn to accept, no matter how annoyed it makes you. Maybe those mod-rules you point out exist purely because that's how the majority of people feel? That's the basis of democracy. Slashdot still, after all these years, somehow manages to see discussions with contrary views and actual debate. For that we should be thankful (though obviously not too thankful -- especially with the ever increasingly 'sensational' stories that seem to be appearing).

    42. Re:Reading the early comments... by gnapster · · Score: 2

      Let's ban everyone with a UID within {437} U {100000,...}, in that case.

    43. Re:Reading the early comments... by gnapster · · Score: 1

      I, for one, enjoy browsing at -1. The modifiers are appreciated, but I want to see it all. Occasionally there's something down there that is really worth reading, and I can skim through the crap fast enough that it's a reasonable tradeoff.

    44. Re:Reading the early comments... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually he's been at it for over a year, although he stopped the following me around across the entire Internet at 6 months. BTW he posted an insult in this very thread, see if you can find him. And how would YOU describe someone whom the ONLY answer allowed is "Linux is perfect and ZOMG M$ burns babies", hmmm? Remember this is a person soooo paranoid he actually believes, I swear to fucking Christ, that I've got a "profile" on him and I'm a "sekret M$ Ninja" employed at Redmond to "keep tabs" on him and "to destroy the freedom of FOSS'. no shit. Hell look up some of old APK's posts, the guy and I have NEVER agreed on jack shit yet when he dared to disagree with the loonie on a linux security matter he accused HIM of being me and started stalking APK across sites as well! Hell APK and I went back and forth arguing for over a month here before we finally just agreed to disagree (BTW I STILL think a recursive DNS server is a better solution than a HOSTS file, but if it works for APK more power to him).

      And my WHOLE argument is we do NOT have to accept the "shit sandwich" just because its free! We USED to have a good thing here because the admins actually GAVE A FUCK. Now they frankly don't give a shit, haven't given a shit in at least 3 years, wasn't that around the time they sold the site? And there are other sites that don't put up with this kind of shit, take OSNews, I've had some long heated technical arguments about OS designs on that site yet nearly all that made a good point as WELL as those that made a good point against were modded UP.

      In the end friend a site becomes filled with trolls because the admins LET THE TROLLS WIN and if you look at the numbers /. readership has been in solid decline for over 2 years. Do we REALLY want this site to become another Kuroshin, a dead site where nothing but trolls and crazies hang out? And what would YOU call it when the groupthink is parroted back and forth for a karma whoring palloza, the only term i can think of to adequately describe that constant wanking is well...wanking or a circle jerk, whichever term you find more appealing i'll be happy to use. In the end things NEVER get better if nobody complains they ALWAYS get worse and that is what we have seen here. The whoring is getting worse, the flag waving, the "treat corps as ballclubs to cheer' mentality which I think fanboi describes pretty well, but if you can suggest a better shorter term again I'm all ears. And frankly I don't give a wet fart about crazy stalker boy but what I DO care about is having a site that actual tech guys can go to talk about actual tech topics in an informal setting instead of some technet or workshop which is what /. USED to be.

      But if you want to find out for yourself how deep the rabbit hole goes just try speaking against groupthink one time too many on any FOSS article and you'll see. Don't be surprised if you find every place you post under your UID having every post followed by "Die you fat fucker die". Then you too can enjoy your very own loonie!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    45. Re:Reading the early comments... by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      As a somewhat frequent moderator this past months and someone from "other non-english speaking country" (I assume that was what you were referring as "other country"), I can tell you I don't recall modding down a single post (it may have happened, but not likely). I believe every user has right to their opinion, even if it is unproductive, insultive, or batshit insane. And yes, I've modded up posts that don't reflect my personal views or opinions, but I founded them relevant to the discussion.

    46. Re:Reading the early comments... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I may have figured out the answer, if only they'd implement it:

      Limit the number of times you can mod any particular user. Borrowing phrasing from another site: "You have downmodded hairyfeet too many times lately. Please moderate other users instead." Then if he keeps downmodding against meta-mod checks, he simply loses his mod points entirely.

      I agree that those "crude words" you used would draw downmods, because it's like when a bully tires you out and tricks you to use coarse language out of exhaustion, then that "justifies" their downmods. I know, I wish we could get off the playground, but if them's the games, ya gotta try to sidestep them.

      Tip - find a scientific phrasing. Buried beneath copyright woes, scientists *have* studied tons of stuff in those little projects that aren't sexy enough to draw page clicks. So for the words you were using, try also "Perceptual Bubble". The entire rest of your post then works, but it's got Secret Sauce that makes the mods happy.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    47. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I only ever mod down and I'm especially on the lookout for posts about the moderation system. Nothing makes me happier than modding down a guy complaining about having being modded down. Seeing this thread makes me sad since I could have spent about a 100 mod points on 'offtopic' in this thread alone today, including on your post!

    48. Re:Reading the early comments... by walshy007 · · Score: 1

      This, and primarily a lack of understanding of how the topics he is speaking about work... to this day he still thinks a stable ABI for kernel interfaces would be a _good_ thing for the development of the kernel..... who cares that the results heavily limit improvement of the kernel, and that even with the _exact_ same sources you won't necessarily get a stable abi, depends on far too much being the exact same each build (even compiler, linker etc), and it destroys portability because your stable abi will not work between platforms obviously.

      The manner of language used does not help either, it always sounds like there is far too much emotion and not enough rational thought. Calm and rational eloquent communication rarely gets downmodded even if wrong, at worst you just get responses explaining why you are wrong and/or why they disagree.

      People who come across as a raving silly person that don't know what they are talking about tend to get down modded though.... I think that is the system working as intended.

    49. Re:Reading the early comments... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Limit the number of times you can mod any particular user. Borrowing phrasing from another site: "You have downmodded hairyfeet too many times lately. Please moderate other users instead." Then if he keeps downmodding against meta-mod checks, he simply loses his mod points entirely.

      Good idea, they should implement this right away, it would kill off downmod-stalking in one fell swoop.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    50. Re:Reading the early comments... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I hope you're joking but I have an idea that would make trolling and shilling much harder: Make new users more sensitive to karma loss - after the first couple of downmods double the karma loss, and if they keep getting downmodded triple it - they'll go straight to karma hell if they start posting shit right out of the gate. The effect stays until they get enough karma to trigger the bonus. That way trolls and shills would have to karma whore for a long time before they can even start trolling or shilling.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    51. Re:Reading the early comments... by jcreus · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, there's moderation on Slashdot. Browsing at more than 1 avoids that kind of comments.

    52. Re:Reading the early comments... by ajo_arctus · · Score: 1

      I really do know what you're saying -- I feel the same myself, but I'm not convinced correlation is causation -- I don't see any sites that have less 'trolly' comments than Slashdot, and I'm starting to think it's just me getting older and not actually feeling the same way as the younger generation. Don't forget that a lot of the Slashdot readership started visiting the site in the late 90's, when we were teens ourselves, and our tastes/opinions/priorities have changed so much in that time -- I know that I'm barely the same person I was back then. What I thought was a great discussion 10 years ago might not impress me so much today.

      There are definitely always improvements to be made to the comments system, but I've yet to see anything better on the internet. Disqus haven't even tried to fix the problem, nor have Facebook comments, and anything phpBB doesn't stand a chance.

      Anyway, I feel for you if you're genuinely being harassed by somebody, that sounds really not much fun. It's also very odd that somebody would do that over such a prolonged period of time. It's a funny old world.

    53. Re:Reading the early comments... by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      MS is as evil as ever. You are having doubts about this? Think they turned over a new leaf after 2005? Then consider these:

      2006-2007: The draconian DRM of Windows Vista

      2006-2008: OOXML. MS bribes and threatens the ISO to get the purposely bad and encumbered OOXML format declared a standard.

      2008: EU fines MS for failing to comply with a 2004 antitrust order. MS has a long history of paying lip service to court orders while evading the spirit of the findings.

      2011-2012: Secure Boot: Windows 8 may be designed in a way that prevents other OSes from booting.

      2012: LG caves, and will pay MS to license technologies supposedly infringed by Android.

      They're still rent seeking, controlling, monopolistic scum.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    54. Re:Reading the early comments... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Maybe you haven't. But I have made posts late at night in North America that have been modded down and commented on (sometimes negatively) during the European day where the comments were from a European viewpoint where they obviously didn't get where I was coming from. Then later in my morning the posts would be modded up and comments where people understood what I was saying were made. Like I said it is often due to not understanding colloquialisms or expressions, but sometimes not understanding local/N.A. perceptions and attitudes. You should be able to see that I am not the only one who has experienced this by the amount I was modded up during North American hours. It may not have been a politically correct thing to say (I.e. some people will get overly sensitive about it even though it is just speaking the truth) but it really happens. Not everyone on every country 'gets' every other nationalities' manner of speech. I am sure that I have been guilty of it too. So as they say in North America, don't get your panties in a bunch, sunshine. ;)

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    55. Re:Reading the early comments... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I don't meta moderate any more because they made it a pain in the ass to see the comments in context. How can I tell if a comment is fare if I can't see what the comment is replying to?

      It's worse than that. They don't even tell you what the previous moderation on the comment was. It's not a meta-moderation if you are not moderating the moderation. The way they have it set up now, it's just a second round of first order moderation.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    56. Re:Reading the early comments... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      But isn't the effect going to be the same? If so, wouldn't they just be wasting energy coding something more complex to achieve the same outcome? Unless you have an idea for a different result that affects the moderator as well as the mod points for the post perhaps? Like if a moderators mods get changed too often they lose karma?

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    57. Re:Reading the early comments... by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Hey, I have no idea what are "american hours" or "european hours". I actually reply to comments at 4pm as frequently as I do at 4am, and I express some very non-popular opinions such as "Microsoft isn't that bad", "BSD isn't dead and I love it", "israel is somewhat of a mistake", "USA is a looney bin run by big corps with a shadow of a democracy", "PHP is a (somewhat) acceptable programming language" and many of my comments are modded up. I don't do hourly tracking of my comments (because I actually have a life, I know, *surprise*), but I'd expect american coloqualisms to be quite easy to grasp for a foreigner, and even if not, I doubt they'd take offense on that.

    58. Re:Reading the early comments... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Right now they just ask if the comment is good or bad. It's even less granular than the moderation you're supposed to be moderating.

      Suppose someone makes an offtopic but informative post. I have to rank the comment good or bad. Suppose I choose "good". If I understand correctly, that means that the moderator who chose "offtopic" is going to get docked and the moderator who chose "informative" is going to get a bonus.

      But that's not what should happen at all. I should be able to moderate the individual moderations. In that case I could reward both of those moderators for their accurate moderations. This is what we used to have a couple of iterations of slashcode ago.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    59. Re:Reading the early comments... by somersault · · Score: 1

      s/illicit/elicit/

      I didn't actually see the comments myself. My threshold is zero apparently. I used to enjoy -1, but I'm getting fed up of all the astroturfing and such now.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    60. Re:Reading the early comments... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Which I guess means that only shills and others with an axe to grind bother to meta-moderate..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    61. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time I see the word 'fanboi' or the phrase 'circle jerk' I lose a bit of faith in the site I'm on. Stop it..

      Fuck you, you have the nerve to talk about "democracy" then get upset at the poster's word choices? Fucking hypocrite.

    62. Re:Reading the early comments... by DemonGenius · · Score: 1

      The answer to this is simple. Just don't give a shit. I've been modded down for clearly illogical reasons, modded down because someone kept refuting me with straw man arguments, modded down because my opinion isn't popular. Jerks, like death, is an inevitability of life and can not be avoided so don't try. Either keep posting like you usually do or quit commenting on Slashdot altogether. Just because you don't get any mod points, doesn't mean that someone, somewhere isn't benefiting from your comment. One reason why my viewing threshold only hides -1.

    63. Re:Reading the early comments... by DemonGenius · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was irony, which at times can be hilarious, or can cause many to simultaneously facepalm.

    64. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a Muslim terrorist day today at /.

    65. Re:Reading the early comments... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      In my experience when people don't understand something it usually for one of two main reasons: The first is that they can't understand it: either they aren't smart enough or don't have enough information, knowledge, or experience. Maybe the last two apply to you but I think not. The second main reason people don't understand is because they don't want to: People can be stubborn and bull headed and even though they are capable, for whatever reason they choose not to understand and be argumentative. By pretending (I sure hope it is pretending because otherwise you fall into the first category) that you don't understand that most people in different continents separated by many timezones are active at different times of the day in terms of GMT... well it make me believe that you are falling into the latter category. That is, you don't want to understand what I am talking about. In that case it is pointless to continue 'talking'. Good luck with that.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    66. Re:Reading the early comments... by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      So, you divide people between "us and them", then someone points out that it might not be as simple as you put it, and your answer to that, instead of actual arguments (dumb/stubborn/whatever the insult du jour people exist in every country, but given the users distribution by country, well... I think it is pretty self-explanatory), you choose to use a subtle insult - either I don't agree with you because I'm not smart, or I don't agree with you because I misunderstood something. So, you must be right and everyone else is wrong. Glad we have YOU on board to save us from ourselves.

      And you still have doubts about why you are modded down?

      Stop pulling shit out of your ass and trying to present it as facts - it is amusing how, when you do your correlation thingy (American time vs European time), you not only forget that correlation isn't the same as causation, and that usual work schedule on both continents actually overlap for some hours, but you ASSUME they do not understand you because they are somewhat "different", and not because they understood you fully for what you are and still think what you wrote is crap.

    67. Re:Reading the early comments... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I'd say its genuine when there are months where every single posting i place anywhere on the net (I'm the same UID pretty much everywhere, if you see a post by Hairyfeet anywhere its me) will almost instantly be followed up by a post that reads 'Die you fat fucker die". Like I said you can look up old APK who also posts as APK everywhere he goes, the loonie that stalks me has been stalking him for a couple of months now because he has convinced himself that ANYBODY that disagrees with him "must be hairyfeet" so even though APK and myself have never agreed on shit or even hang out in the same places other than /. (APK hangs out on CNet and Infoworld, i hang out on Ars and OSNews) he has been getting the same "Die fat fucker die' posts wherever he goes.

      But I don't think its true our tastes have changed, at least not with me, as I have NO problem is someone passionately believes in a subject but I have NEVER subscribed to the BS that something is "right" 100% because of an ideology, be it communism, capitalism, or in the case of /. FOSSism. Like I said we USED to have a 100+ comment post on the advantages or disadvantages of say NTFS VS EXT2 or a top down VS community managed projects and while collars would be heated the discussions were civil and on point, now we get +5 mods for putting a post that says "Use Linux" in the middle of a post on say the new iPad, WTF? What does that have to do with ANYTHING in TFA? answer not a damned thing, its just the trolls have been given free reign and all groupthink gets plus moderation.

      I think the other poster nailed it on not allowing modpoints to be targeted at specific individuals, such as if you modbomb the same person multiple times you should be banned from moderation (I would say banned from the site but that would be harder to pull) but I would go one further and say if this person uses their modpoints to consistently troll a particular subject they should likewise be banned from modding. When i have modpoints I purposely stay away from FOSS articles simply so that no one can accuse me of bias, but if every. single. time. a person gets mod points they head straight for the same sections over and over its pretty obvious they are using modpoints to modbomb. I bet if an admin were to look at the modding for my own posts they'd see that while upmods are all over the place there is one IP address that downmods me week after week, well it don't take kojack to crack the case of the modbomber stalker now does it?

      in the end I've noticed that while the sites you name don't give a crap there are plenty of others like Ars and OSNews that do and show it CAN be stopped, the admins simply have to care. And I'd argue that 2 years of solid declines month after month shows that the readership is simply getting tired of "perceptual bubbles" which is what I've been told to replace 'fanboi circle jerks' with but in the end the results are the same, a handful of parrots spewing groupthink constantly to karma whore a few accounts so they can get enough modpoints to modbomb. i mean look at Mikey 500+ accounts, if that don't show the system is broken i don't know what does. I mean the guy has made over 500 accounts with the same name and an incremental number, how hard is it to spot he's a troll?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    68. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would like that, wouldn't you? As your bonch account, along with other astroturfing accounts, are being exposed as paid MS shills.

      Bonch is one of the many pseudonym/sockpuppet accounts employed to astroturf discussions pushing pro-MS opinions and to attack any point of view which isn't favourable to MS and supportive of their interests.

      Here is a list of known MS shills on slashdot:

      These accounts also engage in cooperative/supportive posts, to try to defend the karma hit that each account receives when their astroturfing covert efforts are blown. See the followup posts to this message from a known MS shill, and check the replies which come out for support and try to counter avoid burning another account.

      These accounts often post messages based on the the same script. For example, see this post from Overly Critical Guy and compare it to this post by bonch bonch.

      http://waggeneredstrom.com/about/approach

      Mod accordingly

    69. Re:Reading the early comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm ... What comments are you talking about ? Where are those comments ?

    70. Re:Reading the early comments... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Your drivers DO NOT WORK which after 20 damned years you better try something friend, if not an ABI (which BTW, Apple, MSFT, OS/2, BSD, Solaris, what do these have in common? A stable ABI. If its such a bad idea how come everyone else but YOU have them. think linus is smarter than the entire planet?) then you better find something because I can take any bog standard box and use apt-dist-upgrade and watch it puke all over its own drivers and DIE HARD. Hell i'll be happy to post a link to an article from a 10 year plus Linux server admin that is now looking at Macs, why? Because openSUSE puked on itself when upgraded and killed itself. BTW the ONLY article you can post or citation you can post here against an ABI is a RELIGIOUS article by a kernel dev that goes so far as to say "I hope those that use non free drivers have broken systems!" so his goal is NOT to have a solid functional system but to push the FOSS agenda, full stop. Finally look at the numbers, here i'll give you a link now notice how you are being beaten by JavaME, a garbage cell phone OS that is on Fred's and Family Dollar $10 Tracphones, why is that? After 20 years that's the BEST you can do? Retailers won't touch it, no OEM except Dell will carry it (and they won't give you their figures because i'd bet my last dollar they are losing money on every Ubuntu sale) and numbers can't lie friend, they are what they are.

      The FOSS community has become IMHO a perfect example of "perception bubble" where everything is happy and gay and no problems must ever be pointed out. You say your OS doesn't need an ABI, then what would YOU do about the OS puking on itself with every. single. apt dist upgrade hmmm? The other guys added an ABI because they didn't want their drivers puking but if you have another way I'd sure like to hear it. here I am in the start of the great XP dieoff and I'm having to scramble to find a source for Win 7 Starter simply because i can't find a single distro that doesn't kill itself when you upgrade the thing and the length of support is too lousy to keep on the same version. The average length of Windows OEM is 11 years, XP-2001-2014, Win 7-2009-2020, I can't even find a FOSS OS that will give you 6 years of reliable updates without shelling out more than the most expensive version of Windows. if you don't like the way i talk sorry chuck, this is called frustration from being constantly lied to for years. I get told 'Linux is ready for the desktop" yet when i try it it dies only to get told I either will have to teach my customers to be unix admins (the cost of training will be MORE than a copy of Windows) or that i must be "doing it wrong" despite the fact that apt-dist-upgrade is not really something one CAN do wrong. the only wrong i'm seeing is the information being placed here by FOSS users who should say "Linux is ready for the desktop*" (*-if you provide free lifetime support or have the skills to diagnose and troubleshoot unix systems) which cuts out 99% of the population and the numbers reflect that. numbers don't lie friend, its not a conspiracy, its that your product simply doesn't work in the home market, not even a little bit. linux is great on servers, kicks ass in embedded, horrible on the desktop.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    71. Re:Reading the early comments... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot. I said you don't understand because you choose not to understand. But now I obviously have to take it back. You didn't understand because you're an idiot.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    72. Re:Reading the early comments... by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      I could be worse. I could be a lazy-ass self-righteous narrow-viewed dumbass american who thinks his opinion is sooo much more valuable than everyone gives credit for, and that got his ass served by what you describe as "an idiot".

  2. The first four comments are disgusting. by forkfail · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, folks - what the hell is wrong with you?

    A young woman of tremendous promise and an incredibly positive outlook on life dies far before her time, and this is what you have to say?

    Some really sick folks. First time in a long time that I've actually been embarrassed of the folks here at /., despite some seriously differing opinions.

    --
    Check your premises.
    1. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Canazza · · Score: 5, Informative

      I concur. While many of us may not consider being an MCP 'worth' of anything, it's still something above and beyond what those arseholes who posted above could ever achieve, even at 39 rather than 9 (yes, thats how old she was when she got MCP), she even got certified to FLY at age 10.
      This is someone who was gifted at something. Yes, I'd call myself jealous of her talent, but that's no excuse to bad mouth anyone. Dead or not.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    2. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dark humor is a coping mechanism for dealing with the nasty, brutish, and short nature of life. I understand this because I've lost somebody close to me.

      Dostoevsky understands this too, because he lost his beloved youngest son to epilepsy, and if you've read his work it's not about unicorns shitting rainbows and roses.

      Finally, a joke - what do you do when an epileptic falls into your swimming pool? Throw in some detergent and your dirty laundry.

    3. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 0, Troll

      Your comment is highly offensive to me. Suggesting that there is something wrong with other people... what is wrong with you?

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    4. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Those posts up there do not strike me as "dark humor used as a coping mechanism", from grieving people. It seems more like the work of a bunch of asshole trolls who hide behind the AC label.

    5. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The real problem is the summary. Yes, it's all very sad that a bright young girl died. But having a "Microsoft Certified Professional" certificate is not what I would call a child prodigy. Judging entirely from the summary, this seems like the usual case of people putting a dead person on a pedastal and exaggerating about how good they were. Now, maybe she did do something worthwhile, but the summary was just stupid. I can list dozens of programmers who wrote really good, meaningful software before they were in high school. I count that as being a prodigy much more than a certificate.

    6. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You think I should care about some little girl who had maybe some tech skills, and died young?

      Well, I think *you* should care about the hundreds of women raped in the last 24 hours, or the ones subjected to genital mutiliation by their own mothers, or the female infants killed at birth in China.

      I did not realize that I could only pick one topic to care about. Thought I could pick both. Silly me.

    7. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Informative

      she was certified to fly an airplane at age ten....

    8. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I think it's important not to pretend like she was the only one that could have passed that test at age 9 or done those other things. It's really tempting for people to lose sight of the fact that there's at least a couple percent of the population that could have done that at that age, and a larger portion that could have done the rest.

      Remember this is the same site where a lot of people were bad mouthing Ritchie for allegedly having less impact than Jobs.

    9. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by forkfail · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To get a cert at 9 is pretty amazing. You may not think much of it, but honestly, that's an achievement.

      To get it in a nation like Pakistan, that's incredible, what with all the cultural impediments that must have stood in the way.

      And if you'd read the TFA, let alone listened to the interview at all, you'd know that her attitude was one that others might consider emulating.

      Regardless of this, it's still beyond belief that folks are being so incredibly mean spirited. Even jackals treat their dead better.

      --
      Check your premises.
    10. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by beadfulthings · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thank you. It took amazing intelligence and self-discipline for her to achieve the certification at so young an age. She was apparently also a promising programmer. That's especially true if you consider where she lived--surrounded by a culture where young girls are not normally valued for their intellectual gifts. Her death is doubly tragic--not only has a promising young life been extinguished, but a pattern and role model for other struggling girls has been lost. Her family deserves a lot of credit for encouraging her gifts and talents, and they also deserve our profound and deepest sympathy for their loss.

      --
      "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    11. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by forkfail · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And it's my bloody right to tell you that you're being one.

      Honestly, it's like Westboro Baptist suddenly got a bunch of new members or something.

      --
      Check your premises.
    12. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Funny

      My mom was trying to organize all 15+ grandchildren for a photo at my Grandmother's funeral. It's probably the first time we've all been together in a long time:

      Come on guys, get together, Grandma's only going to die once.

    13. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your joke was followed by an unnecessarily long and dishonest confession.

      it was also the obvious one that everyone else kept to themselves, but you decided to say it aloud.

    14. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At a certain age, you start to realize that career and work isn't important, neither are studies or anything else, but what you do for yourself, family, hobbies and whatever qualifies for fun, people call this middle-age crisis, but it's nothing more than the final step of maturity, my question is, the same for all child prodigies like that, did she really enjoy it, or was doing it because she was pushed into it by ambitious parents/relatives/friends? No offense, but life is too short to waste it doing something you don't like, no matter how impressive that something is.

    15. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by klui · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or driven by jealousy/sour grapes. I sure didn't have the discipline to do what she did when I was her age.

    16. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by LordLucless · · Score: 0

      Why? I don't see to a reason to lionize someone just because they died. The evidence given that she was a "prodigy" was pretty poor. When I think "prodigy", I think people like Ramnujan, not a MS cert holder.

      That doesn't mean her death isn't sad, that she wasn't a talented, driven young person. But if you're going to praise her, then praise her for things she was and deserved, don't heap false titles on her that exaggerate what she was and did. That's just as disrespectful to the dead as anyone you were criticising.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    17. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody does die. Why haven't you?

      You first, jack ass.

    18. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Beelzebud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One thing I've found that is common among bigots and assholes. They hate being discriminated against. Sometimes I love irony.

    19. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Funny

      I know! I hate intolerant people!

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    20. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed your comments show you never touched anything MCP.

    21. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the one thing that's really missing from this story is what the heck did she die of? Brain tumors?

    22. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is someone who was gifted at something.

      If she learned to fly at 10, she was presumably gifted a sizeable chunk of money.

      Admiral Farragut joined the Navy at nine and was given command of a prize ship at twelve. The idea that anyone under twenty can't actually do much other than play with dolls and watch cartoons is a recent invention.

    23. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by buddyglass · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Dark humor is a coping mechanism for dealing with the nasty, brutish, and short nature of life.

      There's dark humor and there's intentionally tasteless trolling. Let's not confuse the two.

    24. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my country, you aren't eligible to get a pilot's license before you are 19. You can't even get a learner's permit until you are 16. And even fewer people have access to an airplane. I was flying the most complex flight simulators I could get my hands on at that age. If I was as priviliged as her, I have no doubt that I would have done the same.

      I don't really consider the wealth of your parents to have any bearing on your intelligence.

    25. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by sosume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      would you board a plane which was piloted by an epileptic 10-year old? how is that even legal..

    26. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really don't care what country she is from. I certainly didn't have the money for computing certifications when I was nine. I most certainly didn't have anyone willing to loan me an airplane. I think I had much more cultural impediments than she did, because I grew up poor. She obviously grew up rich.

    27. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no one said she was commercial pilot, and I don't know details of that certification, only that it was in Dubai and of private craft. maybe she didn't have the disease at age ten

    28. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      What country is that, in USA 17 for powered flight and 16 for Balloons and Gliders BUT a person can be in training at ANY age. I've shocking news for you, flight simulator on PC is entertainment, not the same as really flying, and there is more to being pilot than "driving the plane".

    29. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Regarding the chunk of money. I seem to recall that the girls' father is an accomplished engineer. It's interesting that behind every story about a "five year old starts million dollar company" or "ten year old invests blah thingy" and so on, is a mother or father who is usually in that same career and/or well-off and connected. That isn't to diminish this child's accomplishments, but only to point out that these stories are usually about kids who just came upon things themselves with no support (or no unusual support/connections/insight that other kids would never have access to).

    30. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stating that it's distasteful to mock someone's death is not the same thing as "lionizing" them.

    31. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      As I started reading the first few comments I was so appalled that I was about to swear off Slashdot for the rest of the year. Then I read your post. Thanks for assuring me that there are some decent people left around here.

      I don't know what the deal is but it seems more and more that people just cannot wait to get in a post of a contrarian nature, contrived though they may be. And in this case, being contrarian pretty much amounts to a complete lack of empathy.

      Yes, I know. It's time for replies about how empathy is a bad trait.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    32. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      I doubt we're looking at "a couple percent" of the population who can pass that type of cert at age nine in a non-native language.

    33. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 4, Insightful

      She was girl well out of their league in both appearance and intellect who accomplished more in her short life the typical Slashdot neckbeard ever will. Add Microsoft to the mix and it's like a glowing bug zapper for these moths of insecurity.

    34. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      This is someone who was gifted at something.

      If she learned to fly at 10, she was presumably gifted a sizeable chunk of money.

      Admiral Farragut joined the Navy at nine and was given command of a prize ship at twelve. The idea that anyone under twenty can't actually do much other than play with dolls and watch cartoons is a recent invention.

      well, blame the child labour laws etc? usually young people aren't instructed and encouraged towards doing professional work - why don't you hear about 12 year old fireplace builders too often? easy, if a parent takes his kid to build fireplaces at random places at that age the cops will show up.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    35. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are wasting time. Yours, ours, everyone's. Please please hurry up go.

    36. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.

    37. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be from reddit. Please, go back there.

    38. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, I realize this. The problem is that it's really hard to get any real flight training, when you don't have a real airplane. I was able to learn to drive (on our farm, where you don't need a license), as soon as my feet were able to reach the pedals. That makes me privileged, it doesn't make me a driving prodigy.

    39. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by sosume · · Score: 1

      That may all be, but it all strikes me as a sad story, as if she was pushed to get all kinds of certifications at a very young age just to glorify the family. Certified to fly usually means by the IAA, which has a minimum age of 18 for getting the certification, and minimum age of 15 to start logging flights towards that. Besides a lot of study, it concerns planning and thinking far ahead. Something 10 year olds aren't particularly suited for, for simple biological reasons.
      I just hope she had enough joy and time to play with other children in her life.

    40. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      plenty of people rent small planes, $80 / hour and up

    41. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      looked like happy person in interviews (no, didn't understand language), some people including kids have lots of energy for things they like...

      at age ten I was electronics book reading and device building/soldering fiend, spent hours a day on my hobby and no family pressure needed....probably lots of other slashdotters nearly obsessive / compulsive about their hobbies normally associated with older people when they were young and happy as pig in shit

    42. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1, Troll

      To get a cert at 9 is pretty amazing. You may not think much of it, but honestly, that's an achievement.

      Right, amazing. However this amazing achievement could be only accomplished by unthihnking memorization of things that must be understood to function properly as a programmer or even a human being. Her brain was fucked even more than the brain of average "Windows professional", and mankind is lucky to not having to deal with a monster she would grow up to be. We have enough trouble with zombified Microsoft way of thinking already.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    43. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Epileptics are "out there on the edge," not all edges are bright or something normal people would admire or aspire to, hers was. It is a shame.

    44. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by LordLimecat · · Score: 0

      Depending on what category it was in, there are probably scores of 10 year olds that could get an MCP in a Desktop OS (ie windows XP) if you could get them to take the test. I got one myself, and Im not terribly proud to have one (MCP in Windows XP). The test consisted of demonstrating that I knew my way around XP (60% of office workers could probably nail that part), how the system functioned, and recovery console / installation (think mini-A+).

      I really hesitated to post this because it is in bad taste to "piss in an open grave" (as parent so eloquently put it), but there really is no need to try to make the MCP something it isnt. Mourn the loss of the kid, mourn the loss of her gifts, and leave it at that.

    45. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She had multiple certifications, all in various programming technologies, NOT simply OS administration.

    46. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      All irrelevant to the point i was making. Dont make this some kind of perverse "my kid's death is more tragic than your kid's".

    47. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only some jackals. I've known others that were pretty cynical. And I never had a jackal tell me a joke, except one, and he was trying to drum up some support for the Republicans. Lots of jackals aren't interested in educating their children, though.

    48. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, in psychology, denigrating the victim of an unjust event is considered a well-recognized coping mechanism -- by suggesting that the victim somehow deserved what happened, a person whose world view the event threatens to upset, tries to reassure themselves that the world is just.

      Unfortunately the world is not remarkably just, and this coping mechanism is a barrier to solidarity and mutual aid.

      For short time frames, awareness of people's inherent tendencies to do irrational things because it makes them feel better, is called for. For long time frames, perhaps evolution hasn't had its last word on the subject.

    49. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, dude - why do you even need to whine about this on the Internet?

      Trolls gonna troll. Raise your comment viewing threshold and *like magic* they're gone.

      Bitching and moaning about -1 AC trolls just feeds them lulz and makes them stronger.

    50. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say (until proven wrong) that if the summary had mentioned learning to fly at 10, responses would be a lot different.

      When I read it, my first thoughts were "Oh, she got a worthless Microsoft certification. So what, a trained monkey could get one of those. In his sleep. With one arm tied on his back".

      Being certified to fly, on the other hand. Now, that's impressive.

    51. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "easy, if a parent takes his kid to build fireplaces at random places at that age the cops will show up."

      Uh, no? As a kid, I worked with my father on roofing jobs all the time in the summer. I was better at it than him since I could get to places his larger self couldn't easily go and had better hand-eye coordination. I think we worked on a couple of police officer's houses in our neighborhood, as well. Never had any issues.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    52. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this, and the juvenile response from the (-1) crowd are exactly why I so rarely read or post here anymore....heck I am not sure I can even retrieve my password.

    53. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      And it's always those who define themselves with words like "tolerance", "acceptance", "pluralism", "liberalism", etc. that seem to have the least tolerance towards those who they consider to be preaching against such things.

      Personally, I think anyone who has strong and clear enough beliefs has the potential to rationalise themselves into a biggoted arsehole, nomatter what side of the political spectrum. That goes triple if you find yourself in a strong enough local majority.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    54. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, it's not legal to be licensed at that age in the USA.

      FAA Part 61.103
      To be eligible for a private pilot certificate, a person must:

      (a) Be at least 17 years of age for a rating in other than a glider or balloon.

      (b) Be at least 16 years of age for a rating in a glider or balloon.
      [...]

    55. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ender's Game

    56. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Come on guys, get together, Grandma's only going to die once.

      Not necessarily...

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    57. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you include "Out of their league in ... appearance" you perv?

    58. Re:The first four comments are disgusting. by n30na · · Score: 1

      It doesn't help that our entire education system appears to be built around the idea that children are stupid. Just surviving through a few years of it is enough to beat the will out of most, even the brightest ones.

  3. Certified Crop of Assholes by tj2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow, what a bunch of badasses we have here. Way to slam a dead teenager for not being as cool as you are. Real men, you are.

    1. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, what a bunch of badasses we have here. Way to slam a dead teenager for not being as cool as you think you are. Real men, you are.

      There, fixed that for you.

    2. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by XiaoMing · · Score: 1

      Wow, what a bunch of badasses we have here. Way to slam a dead teenager for not being as cool as you are. Real men, you are.

      Or as talented...

    3. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by VAElynx · · Score: 1

      Talent is irrelevant in this case.
      Yes, microsoft certification probably isn't the hardest thing ever to get, on the other hand, she did it at 9 which is definitely some sort of an achievement. And of course , it attracts publicity to such a case
      I can see some people being pissed at "what is this doing on slashdot" but regardless , someone such young age dying isn't something to be happy about , unless they are a robber shot by someone in self-defense (you know the broad class of people i'm referring to).
      As for the comment somewhere above, I agree with making fun of the shit that happens, but dark humour has two components - dark and humour. The comments in this thread don't show much of the second..

    4. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by tj2 · · Score: 1

      Mille grazie. My bad. :-)

    5. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A new word for your vocabulary is here.

      --
      Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
    6. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by madprof · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I so wish I had mod points right now to mod this one up. You hit the nail on the head.

      This is a very unusual story. It's basically a rare human interest story on Slashdot.
      This girl wasn't at all important in the computing industry and she didn't invent anything. It's not like Ritchie or Jobs dying last year.

      But it shows how inept people here can be when they write crap going "oh she wasn't that clever"...well so what? The normal thing to do is just not to post if you can't find anything nice to say.

      To post impolitely on a story like this just shows bad judgement and a lack of maturity.

    7. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As I said in response to someone else, she was from a Third World Muslim country that constantly gets bad press for giving a safe haven to Taliban terrorists and puts women in a lower caste than men, so her achieving what she did is worthy of a mention.

      And if a young life that ends so early serves as an inspiration to other teenagers on a path to drug or alcohol addiction, or to an unwanted pregnancy, then maybe it wasn't a totally pointless death.

      It's very easy to be sat in a nice big warm house in front of a nice expensive computer and pour scorn down on others rather than sometimes just taking a deep breath and just not saying anything for the sake of a little compassion.

      --
      Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
    8. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by tibit · · Score: 0

      Empathy and idolization are not synonyms, you know. It's mindboggling that people get seriously upset about some soewhat silly and negative comments about a dead person, yet are first to call the living posters of such comments all sorts of names. Apparently plenty of people have the dead higher on their priority list. Now that's an interesting observation. Thinking "less" of a dead person because that person was an MCE or whatnot is taboo, but classifying plenty of alive-and-feeling-it posters somehow inhumane just because they dare talk down a dead person is fine and dandy? The fuck? Do they deserve less empathy simply for being apparently wrong and alive? How dare they, right?

      I'm not arguing that most of the talking-down posts are borderline trolling or flamebaiting, but the visceral response they elicit is truly uncalled for. I know empathy allright and I dare say you don't know me enough to know otherwise (a few posts is not enough). Yet the visceral trigger-happy speakers-for-the-dead are demonstrably confused about demonstrating theirs. Just to make it clear: it doesn't work that way.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    9. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by tj2 · · Score: 1

      Empathy and idolization are not synonyms, you know. It's mindboggling that people get seriously upset about some soewhat silly and negative comments about a dead person, yet are first to call the living posters of such comments all sorts of names. Apparently plenty of people have the dead higher on their priority list. Now that's an interesting observation. Thinking "less" of a dead person because that person was an MCE or whatnot is taboo, but classifying plenty of alive-and-feeling-it posters somehow inhumane just because they dare talk down a dead person is fine and dandy? The fuck? Do they deserve less empathy simply for being apparently wrong and alive? How dare they, right?

      I'm not arguing that most of the talking-down posts are borderline trolling or flamebaiting, but the visceral response they elicit is truly uncalled for. I know empathy allright and I dare say you don't know me enough to know otherwise (a few posts is not enough). Yet the visceral trigger-happy speakers-for-the-dead are demonstrably confused about demonstrating theirs. Just to make it clear: it doesn't work that way.

      Just to make it clear: yes, it does. Empathy isn't all-or-nothing (few things are). We have empathy and compassion for the unfortunate loss of a young girl, more so because she showed such potential in life. Strictly speaking, our empathy is for her family and the wrenching sense of loss that they are most probably feeling, as is our compassion.

      I, at least, have empathy for idiots who troll around casting rude aspersions on her. I think I have a pretty good grasp as to how they feel. They're still insensitive assholes with a sort of keyboards-only version of Tourette's and an incredible sense of entitlement to spout gibberish that comes from anonymity. I'm all for internet anonymity, but do you think any of these dipshits would have the nerve to show up at the funeral and tell random mourners that the deceased wasn't that smart, it's only a Microsoft certification, blah, blah, blah? I don't, although I'd pay damn good money plus airfare to good and watch if it were to happen.

      And, fyi, the posts were begging for a visceral response. That's why they were posted in the first place. Having gotten exactly that, I'm curious as to how it could possibly be "uncalled for"?

    10. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Yes, microsoft certification probably isn't the hardest thing ever to get, on the other hand, she did it at 9 which is definitely some sort of an achievement. And of course , it attracts publicity to such a case

      I find it to be in bad taste when someone feels they need to over-ascribe deeds to someone who has passed, as if they need to justify her existence for her passing to be sad. An MCP is a very entry level cert (ie, people arent kidding that there are probably many kids who could get it), and its not necessary to pretend otherwise to justify how sad her death is.

      I mean, there are many kids who pass at 16 without an MCP. Is their death now worthless? I get that part of the tragedy is that she was gifted in CompSci for her age, but you dont need to go overboard making it something its not.

      I guess what Im saying is, I find sincerity and frankness to be in better taste in situations like these than pithy nothings about how awesome it is that she got an MCP and what a tragedy. How about just dropping that part out of the summary-- what of value would be lost from its meaning?

    11. Re:Certified Crop of Assholes by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 0

      They're still insensitive assholes with a sort of keyboards-only version of Tourette's and an incredible sense of entitlement to spout gibberish that comes from anonymity.

      What entitlement? That said, I think it's good that they're not oversensitive. I don't even think that they're insensitive. Different people have different senses of humor and they're offended by different things. I guess anyone who personally offends me must be factually insensitive all around.

      but do you think any of these dipshits would have the nerve to show up at the funeral and tell random mourners that the deceased wasn't that smart, it's only a Microsoft certification, blah, blah, blah?

      Why do people keep bringing that up as if it's somehow relevant? Are their arguments/observations completely incorrect because people would beat them up if they dared to voice them in real life? Or are you just saying that you'd like to see it happen?

      But, really, this isn't a funeral or anywhere close to one.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  4. What a tragic loss by msobkow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had no idea epilepsy could be fatal.

    I know the years of blood vessel stress can lead a migraine sufferer like myself to suffer an aneurism -- a blood vessel in the brain "blowing out" and bleeding, causing stroke symptoms or even death. But the concept doesn't scare me, it's just a factual risk I live with.

    My heartfelt condolences to her family. She was so young and so gifted, with such a future ahead of her. :(

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:What a tragic loss by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      It was consequences of the coma that followed i bet, not the actual seizure. Even if she wasn't gifted, it would still be sad.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:What a tragic loss by VAElynx · · Score: 1

      If you aren't treated / seen to , you can do things like choke on your own spittle and similar during a fit.

    3. Re:What a tragic loss by pehrs · · Score: 5, Informative

      Epilepsy in it self is non-fatal. There are acute secondary dangers from epileptic seizures (falls, traffic accidents) and also some medical dangers (hypoxia from suspended breathing, heart problems).

      But primarily, epileptic seizures is a hint that something is _very_ wrong in the central nervous systems on a low level. There exists a large number of things known to trigger attacks, such as infections, brain injury, drugs, withdrawal from drugs and so on. What you want to do is typically to treat the underlying problem. People don't die of the epileptic attack, it's the underlying problem that kills them (or the secondary dangers).

      Oh, by the way, ruptured aneurysm have a surprisingly good prognosis, as long as you get to a hospital in time. If you are a risk group for ruptured aneurysm you really should learn the symptoms and inform your relatives about them as well. This is one of those cases where 2-3 hours makes the difference between "full recovery" and "vegetable".

    4. Re:What a tragic loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A severe epilepsy attack can stop a person from breathing. This quickly becomes fatal.

    5. Re:What a tragic loss by msobkow · · Score: 1

      The only epileptics I've ever known have a GENETIC disorder, inherited and suffered from birth. There is no way to "treat the underlying problem" as you suggest.

      The same is true of migraines.

      However, it turns out the reason no one has ever suffered bi-polar in my family is because in my case, it was caused by a 3-month stint of bad drug interactions that no one knew about when I was prescribed the deadly combination of SSRIs and Triptans that led to Seratonin Syndrome damage to my brain, resulting in a PERMANENT bi-polar condition.

      The way I see it, I'm a literal victim of the drug war, caught in the cross-fire. I'd never have used the pharmacorp meds that caused my bi-polar if I'd known cannabis was a safer, more effective, and more reliable medication than any Triptan ever was.

      I've been poisoned: How the Cannabis war made me bi-polar

      And yes, I'm serious. I was literally poisoned. There may not have been any malicious intent, but I'll suffer the consequences for the rest of my life.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    6. Re:What a tragic loss by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I forgot to thank you for the REST of the info you posted, which was very well phrased and informative. So, Thanks!

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    7. Re:What a tragic loss by osssmkatz · · Score: 0

      sorry, this is a dangerous thing to say when people who are legitametely bipolar may not take their medications because of things like that that you say. I have experience with this. * ADD drugs and stimulants can cause bipolar in people that are genetically predisposed or overdose, or anyone really. This is a fact of the way stimulants work and ramp up the nervous system. * Beyond that, although Seratonin syndrome is arguably real, it is also rare. Marijuana beyond that is dissociative, and produces states that is not going to be helpful to anyone who is manic and prone to delusions. Thanks. It sounds like what happened in your case is you had a bad doctor, bad coordination. But many people with bipolar disorder say they were misdiagnosed, and that the drugs make them ill ("poisons", "brain atrophy") and other ridiculous stuff dreamt of by quacks like Peter Breggin. Look him up on wikipedia. Psychiatry is full of unconstitutional and dangerous treating behavior, but the science is solid, and marijuana is not a treatment, and the other drugs are.

    8. Re:What a tragic loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know somebody who had a seizure. Thank God he fell backwards on pea gravel while wearing a backpack. Five minutes earlier, he was out on the tidepools, on slipery rocks. He's fine now.

    9. Re:What a tragic loss by kaliann · · Score: 2

      Many causes of epilepsy are not genetic or even congenital. For example, physical trauma can cause disruption to the neural tissue that allows for disorganized electrical activity. While seizures acutely associated with trauma often don't result in a diagnosis of epilepsy (e.g. severe head injury--> patient has seizures on the way to hospital), individuals with repeated or severe damage may end up epileptic (i.e. the healed tissue isn't quite right and can induce seizures).

      Similarly, toxins, liver failure, tumors, infections, and hypoglycemia can cause seizures too.

      Migraines are thought to be related to seizures and, interestingly, can also be post-traumatic.

      According to other sources, this girl died due to bleeding associated with an endotracheal tube, not the seizure itself.

    10. Re:What a tragic loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sentiments exactly. It's always a tragedy when someone that young passes away but even moreso when they were so promising. My deepest condolences and Prayers to her Family. It's awful when Parents have to bury their Child.

    11. Re:What a tragic loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My grandmother suffers epileptic attacks due to a fall off a cliff in her teenage years. It is possible to develop epilepsy and not just have the misfortune of being born with some bad genes.

    12. Re:What a tragic loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      science is solid? it's exactly because the science isn't solid that scientology had a chance at it's thing.

      the effects of psyche drugs are pretty random and they're assigned pretty randomly - but they're not marketed in that way. it's not solid in any fucking way.. I'm sure you're pretty well aware of how the process for choosing a drug for a new patient goes: doctor asks shit for 10 minutes and prescribes his favorite drug of the year for depression - if he thinks the guy is someone who'd like to get high then he'll sign him with the most ineffective shit he knows, that's the least addiction causing(duh, if it works it causes an addiction, no shit). new drugs are just engineered from the old and smacked on the market because they cause some kind of effect - and because a lot of personality disorders aren't disorders at all, just people being people, it gets even funkier - being fucking ALIVE is bipolar - unless you're a lobotomized tranquil, but the psycho meds industry markets that you should be happy always, as if you were fucking stoned, but why would you do anything then.

      cigarettes are a psychological drug too, fwiw.

      marijuana on the other hand is widely used, just about the only psycho sedating and calming drug that has been taken for a long time with documented cases. it's sure better for your health than downing a vodka bottle to go to sleep, catch is that because marijuana is illegal it's likely to cause paranoia. psycho meds are supposed to cause the delusion that you're happy and content and all is well, in case of marijuana the number one reason interfering with that is it's illegality.

    13. Re:What a tragic loss by msobkow · · Score: 0

      Too bad. I am certainly NOT saying the meds I'm on don't keep the bi-polar in check, but there's no denying it was not a genetic disorder in my case. If you don't like that, tough -- it's the reality of my life.

      And no, I was not "predisposed". I was subjected to a known and documented drug interaction problem for THREE MONTHS that my doctors and pharmacists didn't even know was an issue because it's so rare to have it happen.

      Kindly keep your "medical diagnosis" to yourself -- you clearly don't know the facts of the case, even though I provided download links and supporting documentation.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    14. Re:What a tragic loss by msobkow · · Score: 1

      That said, you've underlined the reason I'm not trying to sue the doctors or the pharmacies -- they can inject "reasonable doubt" by claiming I was "predisposed". By focusing the case on the UNDERLYING problem that I would never have taken the damaging drugs in the first place if I'd been aware of how good medical cannabis is for migraines, I sidestep that ingenuous escape clause the pharmacorp lawyers would use to escape culpability.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    15. Re:What a tragic loss by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I had understood that any time someone has a seizure, apart from self-inflicted harm, there is a substantial risk. The wikipedia article, for example, seems to indicate that seizures lasting 5minutes or more are medical emergencies.

    16. Re:What a tragic loss by pehrs · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. People with no history of seizures getting one is always an medical emergency.

      For people with a history of seizures it depends on the strength and type of seizure. For example. some people can get frequent and long seizures while sleeping, which seems relatively harmless. At the same type other people can get short, strong, seizures along with arrhythmia (heart problems) which is very dangerous. I don't know where the Wikipedia gets the 5 minute limit from.

    17. Re:What a tragic loss by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      Under prognosis, it links to this page...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Status_epilepticus
      which states that, (paraphrased), seizures that are unremitting for longer than 5 minutes are very likely to cause neuron damage, and are unlikely to self terminate.

    18. Re:What a tragic loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is actually quite possible to die of the actual attack. It the attack goes on for more then three minutes, not uncommon in undiagnosed or under medicated cases, then oxygen starvation can cause brain injury and/or heart attacks. Treating the underlying problem is a problem in any medical or monetary limited situation. The tests to find the real cause can be time consuming and expensive. Identified the actual cause is just trial and error in most child, late teenage onset cases. Better now with MRI,CAT et. al. but not a solved problem by any means. Throw the standard meds and see what sticks is the SOP. Of course, that still leaves having yet another attack while trying to find the correct med and dosage for THIS patient.

    19. Re:What a tragic loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be the result of a hereditary condition. Have you had genetic testing done to determine that your putative father IS in fact your biological father? The odds of this not being the case are higher than you think. Probably more likely than induced bipolar.

    20. Re:What a tragic loss by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "The only epileptics I've ever known have a GENETIC disorder, inherited and suffered from birth. There is no way to "treat the underlying problem" as you suggest. "

      Lady I took care of used to be on all sorts of NASTY anti-seizure medication. She was epileptic.

      I gave her herb to smoke, and she hasn't needed the medication since. It's been almost 7 years.

      And she can actually function. The medication kept her from functioning normally.

      Some people just need a brain reset.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    21. Re:What a tragic loss by Trixter · · Score: 1

      My heartfelt condolences to her family. She was so young and so gifted, with such a future ahead of her. :(

      Don't mourn her loss; celebrate what she did accomplish, and who she inspired.

  5. The candle ... by PPH · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... that burns twice as bright burns half as long.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:The candle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then we sure have some long lived ones here at slashdot; if their arteries weren't otherwise encrusted with hydrogenated Cheetos fats, there might be a record-setter here.

    2. Re:The candle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to rain on the parade, but I hate that saying; it doesn't mean anything. What about stupid kids that die young? Or brilliant people that live to be 100? If I start loafing around will I live longer?

  6. RIP by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    the comments on this topic are disgusting, shows something about an average person (and they are voters).

  7. Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why is this posted on Slashdot?

    This is a sad event indeed, but the sad news here is that a young person, yet to live a good and full life died. Not that a possible future program hero died.

    Its not news for slashdot. Its news that in this world, a lot of people still die because of diseases that should be able to be helped.

    1. Re:Why... by Canazza · · Score: 2, Insightful

      She was a programmer. A gifted, young programmer.
      Slashdot reported on the death of Denis Ritchie, why not her? Or do you feel that they don't matter?

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    2. Re:Why... by gordo3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      she was featured on slashdot years ago when she got the certification:

      http://slashdot.org/story/05/07/15/0651245/microsofts-10-year-old-certified-professional

      it's a sad fact so many assholes have basically the same comments that were said back then... I wonder if they just copy and paste?

    3. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So that people like you could understand the significance of a young hero. She surely would have been a possible future program hero, only if you were able enough to understand her achievement!

    4. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We care about Dennis Ritchie because he _did_ something. She didn't. Maybe she would have, but also maybe she wouldn't have, no one knows.

      It's sad, but in the grand scheme of things, lots of young people full of potential die early.

    5. Re:Why... by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The contributions of Dennis Ritchie are well documented.

      So we know she became MCP at the age of 9 (and getting a bunch of awards). What has she been doing in the past 7 years? A prodigy would have had some sort of output in a 7 year timespan.

    6. Re:Why... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      She was a programmer. A gifted, young programmer.
      Slashdot reported on the death of Denis Ritchie, why not her? Or do you feel that they don't matter?

      Because Ritchie was an icon to FOSS zealots, while Karim was a prodigy within the Microsoft ecosystem. And, frankly, those hated stereotypes about IT people were largely based on observations of some members of the Unix fraternity.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      She didnt' accomplished the same thing as Denis Ritche, nor did her contributions helped shape humanity. It may be a tragedy, but not everyone is worthy of a national mourning period.

    8. Re:Why... by spintriae · · Score: 5, Funny

      She was waiting for Gentoo to finish compiling.

    9. Re:Why... by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      I don't see anyone asking for a national day of mourning. We just don't see the need to act like total dickheads about it on the internet. I know it's a hard concept for someone who can't even figure out how to register an account, but it is what it is.

    10. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, what? You're going to turn this into hate on FOSS? Really?

      Look, the fact is simple. Jobs or Ritchie did something. Ritchie contributed greatly to computing as a whole. She had gotten a certificate. And that is about it.

    11. Re:Why... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Hero? Seriously, I'm not trying to be an asshole here, but what precisely in all of this is heroic? I get that society has watered down both heroic and tragedy to make them mostly worthless, but what in all of this was heroic?

      Somebody died and that's sad, but let's try to keep at least some perspective on this before we get to beatification.

    12. Re:Why... by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 0

      I'm a Gentoo user but I still think you're a sick fuck.

      --
      Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
    13. Re:Why... by mrclisdue · · Score: 1

      C'mon, this is FUNNY!

      Sorry for shouting...but it is funny, especially this far down the page when 90% of the rest of the comments are /.ers complaining that /.ers are assholes.

      cheers,

    14. Re:Why... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Reporting the death of someone like Steve Jobs is of note because he is a well known person, his death will have implications for the tech world, etc. His death is no more or less sad than any other's, it just happens to be more notable for the tech world.

      Part of me asks with an article like this, if my (hypothetical, future) 16 year old daughter were to die, would her death be of unworthy of mention or mouring because she didnt happen to be an ace programmer?

    15. Re:Why... by kokoko1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, i salute her she was truly a God gifted

      --
      http://askaralikhan.blogspot.com/
  8. The first comments... by Dave+White · · Score: 2

    ... are seemingly all arseholes. Sometimes you fuckers make me want to puke. Have a little respect; she's dead.

    --
    --D
    1. Re:The first comments... by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      You don't understand because you're just a useless little twirp with no real life experiences. No one asked you to care, we're just puzzled why you feel its time for insults to her.

    2. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You don't understand because you're just a useless little twirp with no real life experiences.

      Your assumption. It's easy enough to lump someone in with a specific group just because they don't agree with you.

      No one asked you to care

      I just find it funny that the instant someone dies, they seem to become immune to criticism in some people's eyes (that or you can't insult them). Anyone who dares make a joke or insult them is obviously objectively evil or wrong (or, at least, that's what they appear to be saying).

      we're just puzzled why you feel its time for insults to her.

      I didn't. But perhaps they thought it would be humorous (and it might have been... to them). Watching people take offense to it is what I find amusing, however.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    3. Re:The first comments... by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      You find it amusing because you're a sick fuck. I'd love to see someone like you try this bullshit in a real world setting. Have a nice life, asshole.

    4. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      You find it amusing because you're a sick fuck.

      Your opinions differ from mine. Therefore, you're objectively evil.

      I'd love to see someone like you try this bullshit in a real world setting.

      Why? Because might makes right?

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    5. Re:The first comments... by tj2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree that people don't become immediately immune to criticism the minute they die. I fully intend to go to the first bar I can find and buy a round for the house the instant I hear Dick Cheney is dead.

      However, the argument that she hadn't yet done much is a two-edged argument. If her actual accomplishment were small because she was young, her ability to cause offense is equally small. It's tragic because a bright young person full of potential has lost their life due to a medical problem. Bog knows we can use all the bright young people we can get. And as a parent I cannot but sympathize with her family.

      And for the required ad hominem attack: if you don't understand why this is a tragedy, climb up out of the basement and ask your mom. Asshole.

    6. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1, Interesting

      if you don't understand why this is a tragedy

      I never said that I didn't understand why some people believe this to be a tragedy. It's just that I find it amusing how it seems like people get so easily offended when it comes to dead people.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    7. Re:The first comments... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Actually, at the time that you posted that, posts by people saying that the rest of the posters assholes outnumbered posts by people being assholes by about 3:1.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:The first comments... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It's better not to insult people who aren't able to defend themselves, regardless of cause. However, I do have to agree that some people are generally horrible people in life and dieing doesn't change that. In this case, I doubt she deserves to be pilloried in the town square, but some perspective is definitely in order.

    9. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      It's better not to insult people who aren't able to defend themselves

      According to who? I don't really care who someone insults. As far as I know, the dead don't care about much of anything. Even the family probably isn't around on Slashdot to see it.

      I don't believe that anyone is or should be immune to insults or criticism. But it's still seemingly met with, "They're dead! Therefore, all of your arguments are invalidated and you're objectively evil because you don't care about the same things that I do."

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    10. Re:The first comments... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Because it's not productive and lacking in class. Those who aren't able to defend themselves are also not in a position to benefit from the criticism and society at large isn't going to benefit from one sided criticism any more than it does from one sided, ignore all the bad, praise.

    11. Re:The first comments... by madprof · · Score: 1

      You don't understand because you're just a useless little twirp with no real life experiences.

      Your assumption. It's easy enough to lump someone in with a specific group just because they don't agree with you.

      So you have life experiences and you still posted that shit? Jesus, you truly are lacking a little something on the inside.

    12. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 0

      Subjective. Conversely, someone could say that people who get offended that easily are lacking a little something on the inside.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    13. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 0

      Because it's not productive

      So? I still don't care if someone criticizes or insults dead people.

      Something being "unproductive" (in your opinion) doesn't mean that it's bad (or something such as that).

      lacking in class.

      Subjective.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    14. Re:The first comments... by madprof · · Score: 1

      Obviously subjective. But judging by what you seem to be saying you appear to be an immature berk, posting merely to rile people.
      That's normally defined as a troll, so I really ought to be off and not bother with you any longer. :)

    15. Re:The first comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you respond by trolling them. That's why you're being labeled a "sick fuck".

    16. Re:The first comments... by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Perhaps because how we treat our dead is the absolutely most fundamental difference between animals and humans, and thus, is one of the foundations for any civilized behavior patterns.

      Right after that probably comes not sticking your neighbor in the eye with a sharpened stick simply for the sake of doing it. But I'm thinking that might be a bit advanced for you.

      --
      Check your premises.
    17. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 0

      absolutely most fundamental difference between animals and humans

      Humans are animals.

      and thus, is one of the foundations for any civilized behavior patterns.

      I see. So: we're different from animals, which makes us civilized, and civilized things are objectively good? That's your argument?

      Also, I wouldn't say that getting offended over a dead lump of meat qualifies as "civilized."

      Your argument, at least from my perspective, failed to actually explain why it's a good thing to get offended by jokes or insults directed at dead people. It seems like all you said was, "Other animals treat their dead 'poorly'. Therefore, doing that is bad."

      Right after that probably comes not sticking your neighbor in the eye with a sharpened stick simply for the sake of doing it.

      The two aren't even remotely related. One is joking/insulting a dead lump of meat (something that probably can't care about such a thing, and in this case, it happened far away from where the family could see it), and in the other case, it's hurting an innocent person (whether that's good or bad is another matter, but they are different situations). Personally, I don't care if someone insults or jokes about dead lumps of meat.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    18. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      immature

      Subjective.

      But judging by what you seem to be saying you appear to be an immature berk, posting merely to rile people.

      I see. You disagree, therefore I'm a troll? You might think I'm a bit blunt, but I assure you that I said here are indeed my own opinions.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    19. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Who did I 'troll'? I merely told them what I think.

      That's why you're being labeled a "sick fuck".

      Personally, I'm surprised they can function in society. It doesn't seem to take much to offend them.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    20. Re:The first comments... by forkfail · · Score: 1

      Well, I pity you. I honestly do. Because you're are going to either die alone, lonely, and weeping into a bottle of rotgut vodka, or by police bullet when your psychopathic tendencies get the better of you.

      --
      Check your premises.
    21. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Well, I pity you. I honestly do.

      That's horribly offensive.

      Because you're are going to either die alone, lonely, and weeping into a bottle of rotgut vodka

      What about "none of the above"? Isn't that an option? Or can you see into the future? Or did you just feel the need to insult someone merely because they have a different opinion than you? Well, that's always fine, I suppose.

      or by police bullet when your psychopathic tendencies get the better of you.

      It's nice that you can diagnose mental disorders on the fly with so little information. How did you ever gain such an ability?

      I guess people who care about the people, and not their bodies, are actually all psychopaths.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    22. Re:The first comments... by forkfail · · Score: 1

      I'll say this for cheekyjohnson: he is a rare example of actual uncloaked, unabashed and unashamed evil.

      You don't get to see that all too often.

      --
      Check your premises.
    23. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      actual uncloaked, unabashed and unashamed evil.

      I don't believe in absolute morals.

      That said, do you really believe that someone is evil merely because they don't have the same amount of 'respect' for the dead that you do? What if they care about the living and not whether someone joked about or insulted a corpse? I'd say that it doesn't take much for someone to qualify as "evil" in your eyes.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    24. Re:The first comments... by tj2 · · Score: 1

      That's because attacking the defenseless is repugnant to most people, and a dead teenager is about as defenseless as it gets.

      Most people, to a greater or lesser extent, base their self-image partially on being a "good" person. Definitions of "good" are almost as varied as the number of people in the world, but certain basic tendencies tend to be common. One of them is that a good person doesn't hurt others simply for amusement, like pulling the wings off of a fly. I love a good snark as much as the next guy (maybe more so), but I'm not indiscriminate as to targets. I favor the pompous, the arrogant, the hypocritical, the non-believers in science, the obnoxiously religious, and people who simply lack any degree of empathy with others and take pride in that lack. (Hint: you're in that last group, as far as I can tell from your postings.)

      It's not that she's dead; it's that she died young, before she had a chance to fulfill her early promise. I don't have a crystal ball, so maybe she'd have ended up designing a killer robot that destroyed the last dolphins and ran on ground-up puppies. But that's not likely, more likely she's have been a successful and more-or-less decent person, like many of the rest of us. The loss of that potential is what we mourn.

      So, be amused if you must. No doubt in your mind you're superior to all of us who think it's unfortunate that she died, because you only feel amusement at others who think this is tragic. To reiterate: you're an asshole.

    25. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      and a dead teenager is about as defenseless as it gets.

      And dead (no need for defense if you're dead).

      but certain basic tendencies tend to be common.

      And?

      and people who simply lack any degree of empathy with others and take pride in that lack. (Hint: you're in that last group, as far as I can tell from your postings.)

      I've revealed nothing of the sort. I merely said that I'm not offended if someone insults or jokes about a dead person and that I'm amused when people are offended by such things. That does not mean that I have no empathy for the living.

      It's not that she's dead; it's that she died young, before she had a chance to fulfill her early promise.

      And?

      No doubt in your mind you're superior to all of us who think it's unfortunate that she died

      Where did you get the idea that I think I'm superior? Where did you get the idea that I think it's not unfortunate?

      because you only feel amusement at others who think this is tragic.

      I don't think you quite understand. I feel it is amusing not when someone thinks that this is tragic, but when someone gets offended by people who don't feel the same way as them (or by jokes, insults, etc).

      you're an asshole.

      Sounds subjective. I would've probably stated that as an opinion.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    26. Re:The first comments... by tj2 · · Score: 1

      Mea maxima culpa. *I* think you're an asshole. Better?

    27. Re:The first comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People are not offended by your insult to the dead, they are offended by your stupidity. I am not trying to insult you here, this is how I feel about assholes in general.

    28. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      People are not offended by your insult to the dead

      What insult to the dead did I make? And if that's the case, why would they make comments about being offended by those comments that insulted/joked about the dead?

      they are offended by your stupidity

      What stupidity? I disagree, therefore I'm an idiot? This is a subjective matter.

      That said, if they were only offended by that, and not by the insults directed at the dead, then why would they bother bringing up those specific comments? It seems like they'd have to be taking the insults into account.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    29. Re:The first comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cheekyjohnson I've read your comments here and it sucks but you're a douche. You've taken on the role of a social outsider who simply has "different" morals and views than other people. Why are they blaming you, when no offense was meant, and they are clearly being overly sensitive? Well, you are here making sick comments about a dead 9 year old girl. I can't believe you would be happy as this particular person but go with whatever suits you. We all make decisions in life and you've somehow stumbled into the "make [funny] statements about dead girl" category (at least in your view). Or, if you weren't aiming to be funny, why don't you replace that adjective with whatever you want because no matter what word you use, you still come out looking the same. Nobody here likes you, and as sad as it makes me, I bet the same is true of real life. Maybe you have a few friends, but the majority of people (who get sad when a young girl dies) probably avoid you. How about you leave human emotion (happiness and sadness) to the people who actually feel it. If you are missing empathy, you have a big enough hole in your life already and I feel bad for you, but there's nothing that can be done.

    30. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      sick

      Subjective.

      comments about a dead 9 year old girl.

      What comments? So merely making a comment that looks as if it is defending people who actually insulted/joked about her makes my comments "sick"? I do believe that's quite oversensitive.

      That said, happy rainbows all around. No jokes or criticism allowed!

      "make [funny] statements about dead girl"

      I actually never did that.

      Nobody here likes you

      You speak for everyone, do you? Oh, well.

      but the majority of people (who get sad when a young girl dies)

      Oh? When did I ever say that I wasn't sad? I merely said that I think the people who get offended by the jokes/insulted are oversensitive.

      How about you leave human emotion (happiness and sadness) to the people who actually feel it.

      It is highly unlikely that a human wouldn't feel any emotion. What makes you think that I don't feel happiness or sadness? Or are you one of the many people here who have the amazing ability to (incorrectly) diagnose mental disorders will so little information?

      What makes you think that the people who made those comments with jokes and insults don't feel emotion?

      If you are missing empathy, you have a big enough hole in your life already and I feel bad for you, but there's nothing that can be done.

      Not really. It's perfectly possible for someone to live a happy life without empathy as long as they themselves are happy.

      I find it funny that when someone is slightly different from the norm (even so much as a small belief), people will make assumption after assumption about them and try to pretend to be psychologists. I simply care more about the living than a do about a dead body. I'm not going to feel offended because someone insulted/joked about someone that is dead. That's all I ever said here, and yet there has been assumption after assumption that people who feel that way don't feel emotion. I'd say they're both presumptuous and not very good pretend psychologists.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    31. Re:The first comments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "When did I ever say that I wasn't sad? "
      Earlier, you said you had trouble believing so many people felt sad about a dead girl. I can quote the post, but hopefully you can save me the trouble with your memory of typing it.

      Despite what you say, I really don't think I can diagnose a mental disorder. Like I said, maybe you are perfectly normal. I will let the facts speak for themselves. You called a recently dead girl a lump of meat. I won't draw any conclusions from the quote, but you can't argue with the quote itself. You're the person who said that.

      If you know anyone who likes thinking of this girl as a lump of meat, then congrats. I am personally disgusted and hopefully you can understand that. If you can see WHY it makes me disgusted, then that's even better. If you can't understand why I'm disgusted, then I'm sorry

    32. Re:The first comments... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Earlier, you said you had trouble believing so many people felt sad about a dead girl. I can quote the post, but hopefully you can save me the trouble with your memory of typing it.

      That statement says nothing about whether or not I personally feel sad about this. I do indeed have trouble believing that

      Despite what you say, I really don't think I can diagnose a mental disorder.

      Despite what I asked, you mean? In any case: "How about you leave human emotion (happiness and sadness) to the people who actually feel it."

      That's what made me ask that question.

      Like I said, maybe you are perfectly normal.

      You did?

      You called a recently dead girl a lump of meat.

      Yes, and? Is that not true? The girl herself is dead. All that's left is a lump of meat. That wasn't an insult directed at the person who once lived.

      If you know anyone who likes thinking of this girl as a lump of meat, then congrats.

      Whether they "like" it or not is quite irrelevant to me. If I cared about offending people, I'd probably never say a word about anything.

      I am personally disgusted and hopefully you can understand that.

      Can you understand why I'm not? I don't understand people who I'd deem "oversensitive."

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  9. Re:Stress ? by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    Doubt it was stress alone. I bet her brain was wired so differently that something like this was bound to happen.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  10. Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Beelzebud · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think it's about time /. gets rid of the AC policy. If you can't be bothered to make an account, why should you be able to constantly stink this place up with the sort of bile we see in the first few comments to this?

    1. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's about time /. gets rid of the AC policy. If you can't be bothered to make an account, why should you be able to constantly stink this place up with the sort of bile we see in the first few comments to this?

      Because people who say cruel things about a dead child are really going to hold back just because they are under a pseudonym other than "Anonymous Coward" that took a few minutes to make...

    2. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Forcing them to make accounts would just result in an inundation of new accounts that get used until they accrue bad karma, and then replaced. The only way to keep people from acting like assholes online is to attach usernames to real life IDs. You can keep the real life IDs secret to maintain anonymity, but the IDs need to be available to the server so that people can't just make a new account every time they make an ass of themselves. Given the demographic of this site, I doubt that would be a popular policy.

    3. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      It's simple to ban an account. Not so for a free-for-all AC account.

    4. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " Slashdot -- feature request: allow filtering based on username/UID.

      That feature has existed for the longest time as the Friends/Foes" list.
      Click on a user's name, then choose "Friend this user"
      You'll get a menu offering you three choices:
      Friend
      Neutral
      Foe

      It's three clicks, assuming you already have the friends/foes modifiers set.
      If you don't... go into your comments preferences
      https://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm [slashdot.org]
      and set Foes to whatever negative modifier you want.
      -6 means you'll never see their posts unless you browse in the gutter.

      While you're in there, consider changing your default posting method to Plain Old Text.
      Links will automagically get urlified and you'll stop posting blocks of text, because your line breaks will carry over /unless you try to use a forward slash at the beginning of a line //you can still use html with POT
      "

    5. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So you can ignore the fact that the world is full of assholes? AC posting restrictions is good enough to work for the most part. Buck up, be a man, and ignore those who are just trolling. Falling to grief means they win

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    6. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by hort_wort · · Score: 1

      I think it's about time /. gets rid of the AC policy. If you can't be bothered to make an account, why should you be able to constantly stink this place up with the sort of bile we see in the first few comments to this?

      If it came to a user vote, I'd go for this. Hmmm a few other changes might help:
      * Waiting period before new accounts could post.
      * Limit of one account per IP addy.
      * Post limit for people with low karma.

      I think the first few comments were out of jealousy. I've noticed anyone who does well at an early age gets insulted on here, classic bully style. Am I jealous of her ability? Sure. I try to support those who have more talent than me rather than drag them down to my level, though.

    7. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you come from one of those countries that support censorship...

    8. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And it's obviously very difficult for a troll to get a new account when one is banned. Just ask Michael Kristopeit.

      And, seriously, ban people because you disagree with what they say? I'm sure that would do a lot to raise the standard of discussion...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      The only way to keep people from acting like assholes online is to attach usernames to real life IDs

      Michael Kristopeit would disagree with you. And probably call you a feeb and tell you to cower in his shadow.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      When the discussion is weather or not to make jokes and laugh about a topic like this, the decision to ban assholes becomes simple to me. We're not talking about a debate about the merits of string theory here....

    11. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, I think anonymity is still a pretty nice option to have for various reasons, even if there are dozens of douche bags who use it to demonstrate how many people out there could use a good boot to the ass.

    12. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In turn, the only reason to link a real name to an account is to force someone to "stand by their comment," which is a matter of simplicity for those of the real-world status to easily do so. Charlie Sheen won't be hurting for his views on women, but Todd in accounting will be if it gets linked to his real account.

      If someone can't take the one or two steps of inference from the above to the many reasons not to do it, I admit that I have very little left to say to that person.

    13. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that those comments are distasteful, and it's a shame that some people think at a specific moment that it is a good idea to post them.

      Yet, that doesn't justify attacking the right to post anonymously. In fact, even if you successfully eliminate that right, you won't accomplish anything. If you believe that forcing someone to sign their posts will cut down on distasteful comments then you are into a big surprize.

      Another detail which people like you who rant about anonymous speech is that you don't take into account how attacking this will affect your right to free speech. Just like you can't tolerate some type of speech which you find to be distasteful and disrespectful, others will to. Yet, instead of talking about dead teenage prodigies we would be talking instead about religious beliefs, support for political figures, personal principles and whatnot. And more scary than all, those intolerant bigots wont wish to attack anonymity just to curtail some type of speech they don't like, they will want to attack anonymity to be able to hunt down those who state a message they don't like and oppress them through violent means, and even death.

      So, please try to spend a moment thinking about the implication of attacking anonymous speech. It might end up costing you a bit more than reading some distasteful taunts, and you, and your loved ones, may even feel the consequences yourself.

    14. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is a privately owned website. They can set any rules they wish regarding speech. Banning a few assholes from a website, because they're behaving like assholes is not going to have consequences for the 1st amendment.

    15. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Discussions of online censorship used to be /.'s raison d'etre. At least partially.

      I fear that someone like John Gilmore would be vilified here these days.

    16. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

      I guess it all comes down to what kind of site people want /. to be.

      Honestly if it's just some place that trolls can reign free, it isn't very appealing. If we were debating something with merit here, I'd agree with you, but the topic at hand here isn't rocket science. Take a read through the posts in this thread and tell me this a "community" you want to be a part of.

    17. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With default settings you don't see AC comments unless they are modded up. And really offensive comments are always quickly modded down. So you want to ban ACs because they sometimes post stuff you'll never see unless you go looking for it. I really don't understand.

      Posting as AC while I still can.

    18. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not supporting the bunch of asshats who would post nasty comments about the death of a young girl, but AC is the only way some of us will ever comment-- on principal.

      I don't want to be tracked in all I do by some data warehousing company or government, regardless of their intentions.

      This is just a directed comment to you, but my general AC comments usually get modded up to at least 3, usually 4 and sometimes 5, (as long as they are posted before they are completely buried by a large volume of posts. I only post when I believe I can add to the discussion, and a lot of folks (with accounts) seem to consistently agree.

      Those nasty comments were immediately moderated to oblivion. I think the current system works fairly well. Not perfect, but fairly well.

    19. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Did you read my entire post, or stop at the second sentence? I'm in no way suggesting we do away with anonymity. People would still use whatever username they like on the site, without any public link to who they actually are. But in the background, that username would be linked to their actual ID, and they'd be prevented from making tons of disposable accounts. Maybe one new account every six months or so would be a good starting point.

      It's not so different from linking account names to IP addresses, except that it (a) allows multiple people in the same house to have their own accounts and (b) can't be easy defeated by proxies and dynamic IPs.

    20. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by artor3 · · Score: 1

      No one's "falling to grief". We're discussing ways to deal with a problem.

      In the real world, assholes get ostracized. If a coworker made fun of a dead girl around the water cooler, he would be shunned by most of the people in the office, and that would teach him to be more civil in the future. Applying that same social pressure on the internet is a good idea. Otherwise we end up with trolling communities that strive to harm others for their own amusement, simply because the (man-)children have never had to face consequences for their actions, and instead receive positive reinforcement from other sociopaths. The trick is finding a way to do it without totally removing the anonymity that makes the internet so useful for things like the Arab Spring.

    21. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The AC account serves an important function. Mostly it's to ensure that we all remember to get our prostates examined regularly, but sometimes comments need to be made which are likely to piss off the folks with mod points. Or post things which might get one in trouble if pieced together with other things one has posted.

      All in all if you really feel that way, just cruise at +1 and you'll probably never see another AC troll again.

    22. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Just ignore them and cruise at 0 or +1, chances are you're not going to see those sorts of posts or get annoyed by them.

    23. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      No. In the real world, the dickheads get the hot women and the bullies never get punished. Your fantasy is just that... fantastic, and not even close to how things are.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    24. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's try and lighten the mood: feeb.

    25. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because something is private property it doesn't mean that there are serious consequences for curtailing free speech. People like you believe it is a good idea to attack those who express thoughts and ideas which you don't approve, and granting you and others like you the ability to punish those who express their freedom to speak their mind just because you don't like what you hear is something which no one should want. Neither you. Try to put yourself in the shoes of those who are persecuted for saying something, and see how your suggestion puts you and your loved ones in harm's way.

    26. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go fuck yourself, fascist cunt.

    27. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one's "falling to grief". We're discussing ways to deal with a problem.

      The only problem I see is some user's inability to act like grown ups and thus let petty comments rile them enough that they go off advocating ways to punish people just for acting in a way that they don't approve. Do you approve AC comments? I don't. Therefore I don't waste my time reading them and thinking of ways I could punish them for saying stuff I don't like.

      And don't come here with that righteous "social pressure" bullshit, with that "teach him to be more civil" load of bullshit. To see how this is such a good idea, remember that in the 60s this very same sort of argument was used in the US to justify attacking and assassinating people for not "knowing their place" and acting "uppity", with a blatant disregard for that time's social order.

      This "social pressure" bullshit is just an excuse for authoritarian folks to bully people into submission and force them to be subjugated to your own views on every given subject. It's thanks to this bullshit that, even in this day and age, we get teenagers being stalked and receiving death threats for not caving to "social pressure" and be fervently aligned with a religion. And this is supposed to be a good thing'

      So, the problem isn't any AC spewing crap to a forum. The problem is you, and others like you, who are urged to inflict punishment on others as a form of revenge just because someone dares to do or say something you approve, and who doesn't cave to your "social pressure". The real problem is that you, and others like you, are intolerant bigots who believe that it's ok to use force and violence to shape society into your preconceived notion of what is supposed to be. The real problem is you, and your inability to just ignore irrelevant stuff, such as bullshit comments, and instead opt to react violently to punish those behind them. You are a worse influence in society than anyone posting distasteful comments on any message board, and your self-righteous attitude does not benefit an society in any way.

      So, if you don't like distasteful comments then stop browsing at -1 and go on with your life. Don't waste your time pretending that you know what's good for society, because you don't. If you don't like it then consider this your recipe of "social pressure", and see how you like it.

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    28. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading the thread below, I might suggest you try trolling sometime yourself. You may find that you like it, and that the "victims" lost less utility than you gained because of the uncertain nature of internet reactions.

      And yes, chicks love it.

    29. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      waaaaaaaaaaaaaahh, my internet isn't adhering to my overblown standards of what I consider nice. So naturally, my first instinct is to beat it until it does.

      And you guys are AGAINST sopa? Could've fooled me. Sounds like you're already fine with sacrificing anonymity to sate your desire for everything to be PC.

    30. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Maybe you have been in a smaller more sheltered pool than you realise? I can't think of an office that I worked in where there were not sick jokes around the water cooler. I'd say that it is obvious that there is a wider range of humour in the world that what you consider acceptable, and I'm surprised that you think you have the majority view.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    31. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by fnj · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, just how do you think that might be done, in a realistic technical sense?

    32. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by smallfries · · Score: 1

      When you can freely block AC posts using the tools that you already have available why would you want to ban other people using them? It does lead me to suspect that you are a fundamentalist - it's not good enough that you can't see it, you still have the nagging suspicion that somebody somewhere is doing something that you disapprove of.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    33. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by fnj · · Score: 1

      * Limit of one account per IP addy.

      How would this work with broadband mobile? In my experience, most if not all broadband mobile users get a different IP address every time they log on. Most dialup users, same thing. Anybody logging in from a place of business gets the opposite problem. Everyone at that site very often gets the same apparent IP address. People still do use multiuser hosts, as well. Everyone on a given host gets the same IP number.

      We have to face the fact that IP addresses do not identify individuals; do not even serve usefully or reliably as indicators to distinguish anonymous individuals one from the other. I suppose IPV6 addresses COULD be enforced to identify specific hosts if you went out of your way to outlaw NAT, but there's a lot of implications to that. I'm pretty sure I couldn't be in favor of it.

    34. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by goose-incarnated · · Score: 1

      While I haven't made jokes about this story, why do you want to prevent people making fun of the dead? The dead are ... well ... dead. They aren't going to mind if some random AC gets modded to -1 (and hence becomes invisible) for making a joke at their expense. Their families won't even know.

      It's a slippery slope to start regarding certain things as too "sacred" to be mocked. You're probably very religious as well, aren't you?

      --
      I'm a minority race. Save your vitriol for white people.
    35. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I'd agree with making posting AC much harder, but not eliminating it. Make AC posters fill out 10 captchas before posting or something. That way if you really need to post something anonymously you still can, but you can't make shitty first posts as an AC and trolling will require more effort.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    36. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Using real names is a terrible idea, it can come back to bite you in the ass. See Slashdot poster Michael Crawford, who was minding his own business and posting journals on here and on K5. Some low-life asshole troll on K5 looked up the IRL identity of a woman he posted about who was mentally unstable, long story short the troll riled up this woman to the point that she cut off all access to Michael, the only decent friend she had, and was nearly institutionalized, which would have caused child protective services to pick up her kid (who at one point wasn't getting the medical treatment she needed because her mom went into paranoid lockdown).

      If I posted under my real name I couldn't talk about...most of the stuff I talk about on here. I'd have to keep it clean and family & corporate friendly like a Facebook page, and that would be boring and no fun.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    37. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by hort_wort · · Score: 1

      * Limit of one account per IP addy.

      How would this work with broadband mobile? In my experience, most if not all broadband mobile users get a different IP address every time they log on. Most dialup users, same thing. Anybody logging in from a place of business gets the opposite problem. Everyone at that site very often gets the same apparent IP address.

      Yeahhh I guess that could cause problems, you're right. Well, if someone can only post more than once per hour on an account with so much positive karma, I guess having to log in again and again for different accounts would dissuade naughty folks enough.

    38. Re:Stay Classy Anonymous Cowards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So "Beelzebud" is your real name? I don't see what the difference is between an anonymous moniker and "Anonymous Coward" other than that the "powers that be" have a better chance of tracking you so you better not say anything too controversial. Oh, and I guess you have to get more email accounts to register them and spend extra time logging in. These comments could just be an attempt by the "powers that be" to give anonymous moniker's a bad name. Punishing a group for the actions of a few is not a good precident.

  11. Tragic by jargonburn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A moment of silence for a bright little star winking out, no more to lend its brilliance to our future.

    1. Re:Tragic by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      A moment of silence for a bright little star winking out, no more to lend its brilliance to our future.

      Very nice words. Worth quoting, thank you - and I feel the same way (though am not so articulate).

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    2. Re:Tragic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No man is an island,
      Entire of itself.
      Each is a piece of the continent,
      A part of the main.
      If a clod be washed away by the sea,
      Europe is the less.
      As well as if a promontory were.
      As well as if a manner of thine own
      Or of thine friend's were.
      Each man's death diminishes me,
      For I am involved in mankind.
      Therefore, send not to know
      For whom the bell tolls,
      It tolls for thee.

      "For Whom the Bell Tolls", John Donne

      Sadder still when it is someone with such promise...

  12. Appendage inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If 80% of your blood is in your left hand, while it may allow you to play tennis without the need of a racket, can cause varying types of seizure. See pic in article for details.

  13. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well at the basic level Certified just means you can pass the test.

    Do you know how old she was when she passed it? She was 9.

    You may not be impressed by that fact, but I am.

  14. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seriously? Getting certified at age 9 does not qualify enough to be appreciated? You cannot even spell "were" and "a lot" at this age and you're pointing fingers at a dead legend?

  15. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by singingjim1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People have to die. Sad fact. Don't take it so hard. I bet about a million other people died the same day. Are you mourning for them? Lighten up, Francis.

  16. I am astounded by vikingpower · · Score: 3, Insightful
    at the level of most of the comments here. Had I known this teenager ( I only learned of her existence through this post ), I would have seriously thought of how to make a full-blown engineer or computer scientist out of her.

    I know that, in the face of the appallingly low level of most of the comments here, it is easy to take the moral high ground. I know. But still - this is tremendously sad. We ( with "we" I mean both "humanity" and "we, the engineering community" ) lost something valuable here: a promising life.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:I am astounded by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I've noticed the number of trolls around here has picked up in the last week.

      Did Yahoo Answers get shutdown or something?

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  17. Terrible news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't know her, had never heard of her, but to pass at 16 is just sad. So much unfulfilled.

  18. Sad :( by aquarajustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's sad that she passed so early. She appeared truly gifted and it's a shame that she died too soon to learn how awful Microsoft products are. She could have become quite the *nix wiz.

  19. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    So in other words, no human life has value, and we should just shrug our shoulders and move on. I hope on the day someone you care about dies, no one follows it up with insults and a "lighten up, Francis!"

  20. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft certification: even a 9 year old can do it.

  21. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by forkfail · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps, but I don't make a habit of pissing in open graves before the dirt's even shoveled in.

    And I find it reprehensible when others do it out of some sort of misbegotten patriotism, envy or need to prop them selves up by being vile to others.

    Especially in the case when such potential for brilliance is snuffed out so early.

    --
    Check your premises.
  22. Blame Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I blame Microsoft. She must have seen what they did to the Metro API in Windows 8, lol.

  23. Rest In Peace by RonMcMahon · · Score: 2

    Arfa, thank you for being an inspiration during your too-short life. You'll never know the positive example you've been to tens of thousands!

  24. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Truly, it's not that impressive. I was programming at that age, and probably could have got through such a thing (pulled out of my ass - I don't know what you have to do for it, but I'm guessing it's not going to be hell). I'm not saying it'd be easy, but I don't think it makes you a prodigy - again, not saying that she wasn't, but it was poor proof of it.

    Either way, it's a shame she is dead.

  25. I never heard of her before by erroneus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To think that a [presumed] Muslim female, a child at that, could accomplish what she did is amazing on so many levels. I am with others on the presumption that her ability was possibly also part of her undoing. The brain is a tricky thing. Hers was likely wired in such a way that it contributed to its burning itself out.

    That said, those woman-oppressing Islamic fundamentalists out there can look upon her with all the anger they like. They can't deny what she was. She was female. She was extremely young. She was extremely accomplished and had extremely high potential. I doubt this is the type of symbol she would have wanted to be, but she is definitely a symbol of defiance against ridiculous religious ideals which seek to limit and oppress women into specific roles in life.

    1. Re:I never heard of her before by astropirate · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about??? who is talking about fundamentalists?

      You should learn something about the Muslim world other than what you see on the news channels. Its not the dark and gloomy place its made out to be. Please ask yourself what do you know about it aside from what you hear on the news.

      One thing you MIGHT learn from reading up on things is that the oppression of women is not in any way part of Islam, its all unsophisticated cultural rituals that uneducated people inject into their societies.

    2. Re:I never heard of her before by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Seriously? The "cover yourselves" thing in the Quran is pretty oppressive. I know one particular Muslim woman who is pretty devout. She loves nature and especially the sea and beaches. I asked if there were any exception in that regard so she could better enjoy it and she lost her smile and the shine of her face... there was no exception unless there was absolutely no one else around. That response was all I needed to know. Regardless of how accepting and how 'natural' it may feel to be required to cover themselves in even the most colorful of curtains, there are some joys in life they are to be denied because of what is said in the Quran.

    3. Re:I never heard of her before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming a logic to their thought processes that doesn't exist. I'm sure they would say that her young death was punishment from on high for acting in a way inappropriate to her gender.

  26. Epilepsy can be fatal by ncmathsadist · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes, epilepsy can be fatal. It can shut down the central nervous system, starve the brain and other vital organs of oxygen, causing death. That just happened here to a very promising young student here in North Carolina. I convey my condolences to the family. There is no crueler cut of life than having to bury a child.

    1. Re:Epilepsy can be fatal by cerberusss · · Score: 2

      There is no crueler cut of life than having to bury a child

      What surprised me, is that this is a scientifically proven fact.

      In one of his books, psychology researcher Martin Seligman reported on his findings how people deal with severe depression. Almost all his patients get better completely, except those that lost a child. Apparently, it's a blow that most parents just don't seem to recover from.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    2. Re:Epilepsy can be fatal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And whatever you do, don't tell your employer, because even large, well-known software companies will fire you if they find out you have a disability.

  27. and alot of them did not have a certificate by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    So what we have hear is a head line that makes a big deal about the cert. Now can one any point to some real work (not just passing a test) that she did??

    Not saying anything bad about her but the summary makes a big deal about the cert and not much more other then a trip to the main MS office.

  28. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft Certification: Harmful for Children

  29. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Indeed. The MCE tests are pretty easy for an adult. Passing one as a teenager displays a somewhat above-average level of competence. Passing one when your age is still in single digits is very impressive.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  30. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by tyrione · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well at the basic level Certified just means you can pass the test.

    Do you know how old she was when she passed it? She was 9.

    You may not be impressed by that fact, but I am.

    The tragedy is that she was a young girl in the prime of life and seeing her life taken too soon, not because she was labeled a Microsoft Certified recipient and thus labeled a child prodigy for doing so.

  31. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Get a grip, folks.

    I'm not a programmer, but I am pretty good at my chosen profession. I know without a doubt that I couldn't have passed any sort of "certification" exam at that age, whether it was related to my profession or not.

    I'm pretty sure I've got a grip.

    Just sayin'.

  32. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Beelzebud · · Score: 3, Informative

    Okay, so you're honestly trying to say that any 9 year old could pass that test, if their parents simply "forced" them to learn it by flash cards? Get a grip, indeed.

  33. Screw Most of You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    I am sickened by some of the posters here. I expect stupidity and ignorance from the CNN posters, here I thought there were be a higher standard because of the average intelligence and educational levels of the average reader here. I was sorely mistaken. If you're so jaded and bitter that you use the news of the death of a young girl, who seemed to be quite remarkable by the way, to post stupid shit about how you hate Microsoft, certifications, or whatever, you need to get your humanity checked. I know you can feel so smarmy posting your bullshit into the ether, but, you are genuinely fucked up for doing so. I really have to stop reading reader's comments on websites, it's actually beginning to damage my soul. Thanks assholes.

    1. Re:Screw Most of You by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      here I thought there were be a higher standard because of the average intelligence and educational levels of the average reader here.

      That was your first mistake. ("more intelligence" "more education" "greater emotional maturity").

    2. Re:Screw Most of You by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      Bleh. Slashdot ate my logic symbols. NOT ( "more intelligence" AND "more education" => "greater emotional maturity" )

  34. Same about the young kids with high level PHD's an by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

    Same about the young kids with high level PHD's and degrees.

    Now if some kind was high along in some kind of a IT apprenticeship then it's a big deal but the degrees over real work and tech school is wrong with IT today.

    CS does not give the skills to do IT work and it's to long in a class room for IT any ways and that some leads to people rolling software / ideas / plans with the knowledge of working with at user end and up.

    theory does help but CS is over loaded with with. Some cert tests are some what theory / way off base from the real work place. Other cert tests can be done by people who are good test takes.

  35. Re:The candle ... NO by mythar · · Score: 5, Informative

    she didn't die because she was burning twice as bright. she died from complications after they made an incision to insert a breathing tube into her trachea. that means she didn't have to die, and it was an incredible tragedy that she did. i am both sad and angry at this terrible news.

  36. BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA: "In recent weeks, Microsoft had stepped in to help provide expert medical care."

  37. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, I find it as disgusting the people straight up insulted a dead person. However, millions of people die every day. Such things happen. And if I don't feel sad for a person I've never heard before that might have or then again might have not been smarter than the average, then that's my choice.

  38. Re:Tag her and bag her by VanGarrett · · Score: 0

    The freakishly intelligent often die quite young. My grandmother, for example, had a cousin who was formally tested, and found to have an IQ well over 200. He did rather well for himself, up until he died at the ripe old age of 19. I've heard of other examples of this sort of thing, too. They just seem to burn out, for some reason.

  39. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by artor3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's pretty special that you consider the phrase "not as gifted as Mozart" to be synonymous with "not impressive". I hope your kids grow up to be Oscar-winning astronaut quarterbacks, or else you're in for quite a disappointment.

  40. Lack of empathy by formfeed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Lack of empathy is a clear social dysfunction and the only excuse is adolescence.

    I would not ridicule a 16yo for not understanding how others might feel or how things are for someone else. If you are still busy finding your own identity it is difficult to feel for others. But if you're 20+ and still posting things like the above comments, you are on the way of becoming a pathetic loser.

    1. Re:Lack of empathy by tibit · · Score: 1

      There's lack of empathy, and then there's idolization of the dead. Neither is cool.

      Yes, a good life has been lost, and her story is pretty cool, I agree. Her life philosophy is certainly not unworthy of adoption. But let's not go overboard. The story is interesting, it belongs on the main page of Slashdot. Taking some of the "lacking in empathy" comments too seriously may be a social dysfunction too, yaknow.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    2. Re:Lack of empathy by tibit · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps they don't even have a lack of empathy. Perhaps they just don't feel the same way that you or others do about certain things. You know, they have different priorities than you. What they care about may be different than what you care about. And vice versa.

      You've nailed it. Thanks!

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    3. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't met many CEO's have you?

    4. Re:Lack of empathy by pseudofrog · · Score: 2

      Yes. Anyone different than the norm is obviously objectively broken.

      Or perhaps they don't even have a lack of empathy. Perhaps they just don't feel the same way that you or others do about certain things. You know, they have different priorities than you. What they care about may be different than what you care about. And vice versa.

      Subjective. Bam. I just sand-blasted your stale saltine of an argument.

      The world would undoubtably be a much better place without psychopaths. Whether these posters are actually psychopaths or not, society generally concludes that there is something "wrong" with those who gleefully mock the death of a 16 year-old who was, by accounts, a good kid. Cry me a river if you feel victimized by society's desire to consider you "abnormal".

      And, by the way, I don't think it's a "priority" for folks to find this news in some way sad or upsetting. It just seems like a fundamental tenet of being a human being.

    5. Re:Lack of empathy by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      This supposes that becoming a CEO implies lack of social dysfunction. I might argue the opposite.

    6. Re:Lack of empathy by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      Subjective. Bam. I just sand-blasted your stale saltine of an argument.

      What is "subjective"? The first sentence was merely sarcasm.

      The world would undoubtably be a much better place

      Now that is indeed subjective.

      Whether these posters are actually psychopaths or not, society generally concludes that there is something "wrong"

      Society can conclude whatever it wants. But it's really rather irrelevant to whether they're 'right' or 'wrong'. Personally, I conclude that people who are offended by such jokes or insults are oversensitive babies. But what does it matter?

      Cry me a river if you feel victimized by society's desire to consider you "abnormal".

      I don't feel victimized by anything. I just find it amusing.

      However, "cry me a river" is exactly what I'd use in response to people who are actually offended by such things.

      It just seems like a fundamental tenet of being a human being.

      Apparently it isn't. Unless the people who made those comments are actually aliens from another planet, of course.

      I do find it amusing, though, how just because some people have a different sense of humor than some other people, those people are seemingly being labeled 'monsters' and other such things. As if the fact that they don't want to cry at the passing of every random person means that their sense of humor is 'wrong' (and I doubt even people who say that they are wrong care that much about random people).

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    7. Re:Lack of empathy by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Dead strangers in general don't really concern me. I only care about those dying who're close to me.

    8. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your MO seems to be:

      1) Act like an asshole
      2) Wait to get called an asshole
      3) Call claims "subjective" and whine that people are so sensitive

      How amusing.

    9. Re:Lack of empathy by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      1) Act like an asshole

      I don't think I did that, though.

      3) Call claims "subjective" and whine that people are so sensitive

      I'm merely pointing out that the things that they stated as fact are actually subjective.

      It's indeed amusing.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    10. Re:Lack of empathy by fnj · · Score: 1

      Adolescence excuses NOTHING. Yes, it must be taken into account, but it's not a get out of jail free card. I don't know about ridiculing, but depending on the assholishness of the 16yo, I would try to apply correction. There are plenty of 16yos, some who have had it easy and some decidedly not, who are nevertheless not assholes. Quite a few have, on their own, surmounted terrible conditions and terrible things done to them. I won't just give a pass to those who never make the effort,who have no empathy or understanding whatsoever.

    11. Re:Lack of empathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sad that you act this way cheekyjohnson. Unlike everyone else here, I don't really blame you for these comments, because I think part of it is due to factors that were beyond your control. Maybe it was your parents, or other kids didn't respond well to you, or maybe there was nothing wrong with you and you've just chosen to be this way. But for whatever reason, I'm sad for you. I guess our society has always had "misfits" who need to find an identity of their own. And it looks like you're content being the person who makes these comments about a young girl's death. I don't "hope you continue living like this" as some other posters have said. I don't really know how you should live. It sounds like you've found your place on the edge of society, but maybe you could make the edge a nicer place to inhabit

    12. Re:Lack of empathy by formfeed · · Score: 1

      Adolescence excuses NOTHING.

      Yes, one should say explains not excuses.
      And even then, I agree: it is not just an age thing. Some even argue that adulthood at least for college students starts later today and many 20+ still show adolescent behavior. On average of course, individuals differ. My point was simply: in someone young it is understandable, and could still change. But I share your experience: One can talk to some 16yos and get a sense of mindfulness that is missing in much older individuals. And the 20yo old asshole might still be one at age 30 or 40. Instead of making jokes about dead kids on the Internet, he just figured out socially acceptable ways of being an asshole.

    13. Re:Lack of empathy by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      because I think part of it is due to factors that were beyond your control.

      Part of what? Maybe you act the way you do due to factors that were beyond your control. But what does it matter?

      That said, if you intended to refute anything I said, you didn't really reply to anything.

      But for whatever reason, I'm sad for you.

      I highly doubt that. Comments such as "I pity you" and "I'm sad for you" seem to be, more often than not, mere insults.

      I guess our society has always had "misfits" who need to find an identity of their own.

      And it always has had oversensitive people, as well.

      And it looks like you're content being the person who makes these comments about a young girl's death.

      What comments have I made other than that dead bodies are lumps of meat? I'm not the one who made those jokes or insults. But I do find it interesting that many people seem to say, "She's dead. The dead can't be insulted, joked about, or criticized. Therefore, all of your arguments are invalidated and you're objectively evil for even so much as appearing to defend people who do any of those things."

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    14. Re:Lack of empathy by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      Dead strangers in general don't really concern me. I only care about those dying who're close to me.

      What the hell? You're barely human. You probably have a lot in common with those losers who go around shooting up high schools and colleges because they got picked on for being weird. Not cool.

    15. Re:Lack of empathy by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      So according to you, not caring for dead strangers = willing to kill random people?

    16. Re:Lack of empathy by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      No, I said "have a lot in common" not "are identical".

  41. Re:The candle ... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously don't get the reference, or the respect that the reference implies.
    You're an asshole.

  42. What is this I don't even by Securityemo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are you so attached to the idea of performance and computer skills that you'd even consider it a relevant subject of discussion when such a young person has passed away? You're all like Scrooge, but with computers chained to your souls instead of cash.

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
    1. Re:What is this I don't even by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Now what is that you are so chained to that you couldn't resist, despite the ire that I'm sure you must realise such a comment will raise, posting said comment?

    2. Re:What is this I don't even by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      How many thousands of young people die every single day? Should we have a story for each one? If not, how do you pick? Why should this one be any more relevant than any other?

      I submit that all of these stories are sad and tragic. And lifting one up like this cheapens all of the others by comparison. The story is a disservice to all children who die who are not her.

    3. Re:What is this I don't even by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many thousands of young people die every single day?

      Of the 155,000 people that die every day globally on average, just over 30,000 of those will be children under the age of 5 who die from preventable diseases...
      Can I just make an observation apropos some of the comments I've seen here on /. recently, this place is becoming /b/ light....

  43. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Beelzebud · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah I'd hate to be the child of the guy up there saying that any 9 year old could pass this test, if the parent just forced them to learn it on flash cards. Potty training is going to be rough in that house.

  44. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

    It also depends on the test. MCP by itself is kind of a meaningless certification as it simply means that you have passed one of the many tests, and not all of them even have to do with programming - e.g. there are some Office certifications that'll give you that.

    She, on the other hand, qualified by taking a C# WinForms exam. Also according to the same, she passed an exam for ASP.NET two years later - judging by this, she was on her track to become an MCAD (MS certified app developer), with only one exam remaining. I went through that myself, albeit at an older age (started in 14, got my MCAD by 16) - it's not exactly hard, but it does require that you know how to code, and know C# reasonably well. Doing it at 9 is certainly quite impressive - heck, back at tat age I was still trying to figure out how to write Tetris in Turbo BASIC, without much success at that.

    And not to forget that she was born and raised in Pakistan, which is not exactly a first world country - so it's not like she had many opportunities and lots of free time to waste.

  45. God Bless. by eyenot · · Score: 2

    I studied up on her, and, one of the things I noticed is that when asked if she's a net applications developer, she resopnds that she programs in C#. And when I studied the requirements for MCP, I couldn't find an instance of the word "Java". So... at least we can say that the poor young soul never had to know the pain of Java.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  46. Funny to see the divide here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On one side we have the who cares, this is not the place to post this. The on the other side we have Its such a tragedy we lost such a great young mind! Then we have the people who probably agree with the first but are to afraid to comment for the karma loss inflicted by the second side.

    Lets be honest, it is a tragedy any time someone dies, even more so when that person had potential to change alot of peoples lives through their work, but let us remember we lose people everyday with more potential and intellect than this girl. She had the right combination to get to the point were she could excel, good parents that encouraged her that had money to make possible what she wanted to do. So I think on that point is a greater tragedy when we lose someone who tries to excel even though they have none of those things to help the process. Where is the press then? Where is microsoft to help them find the best medical care? Where is the overzealous out cry of mourners for those people?

    I think its time the second group of people step back and re-look at all the shit they are giving the first group of people, unless you can name every bright mind the world has lost in the last year and how that young kid who was working themselfs through college because his mother was a crack head and his farther was in jail has effected you.

    1. Re:Funny to see the divide here by eyenot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been programming since I was eight years old and I'm homeless while I attend college. If I get sick I'm likely to get told to leave the hospital before I'm even treated, because I don't have insurance. So I didn't apply for certs, there wasn't any such fuckery until I was about 14. So this girl did -- the youngest to do so, ever. Of course the major person behind the certifications is going to play her up beyond all human recognition. There are probably numerous young girls and boys just like her who don't ever receive any recognition or even, as I was, are told they're wasting their time and that they need to focus on "more important things" (in my case, my parents wanted me to become an automobile factory worker. It seems like everybody I meet actually throws that one my way, funny.)

      I agree with parent, but I'm especially glad to see such a divide, because it lets me bring something up: opportunity. This particular girl was born at a particular time and took particular advantage of a niche.

      Think of it like this: no other young person is going to have a chance to be of the same distinction unless they lower the bar even further and apply for (and receive) their certification at an even earlier age. Eventually you'll find the lower age limit for the cognitive abilities required, and that'll be that. Is that what you're really celebrating?

      Or are you celebrating that a man like Bill Gates has the money to make a celebrity-like figure out of anyone he chooses? After all, it lent glamour and glitter to *his* company whenever he publicized this girl's abilities. It put *his* certification, which some people argue is probably worthless, in a novel (new) light that magically set aside anyone's misgivings on the subject over the awww-factor of the cause celebre. Is that worth celebrating? Is that anything that hasn't been done (to death) already?

      I'm not trying to be crass. There's a place for people to mourn every death. But I'm reminded here, quite distinctly, of how many people, upon the death of Steve Jobs -- people, many of them who never, ever, thought, or spoke (or probably even registered hearing or reading) a single little word about Steve Jobs -- mourned the loss of such Immense Genius. When it comes down to it the man stole ideas and sued like hell whenever he could. In some ways he was a bitter old prick whose lasting legacy in my eyes is that I STILL don't have Macromedia Flash on my i-device.

      I think anybody who fawns over this young talent or bewails the loss of such Immense Genius is not seeing the bigger picture of life. Maybe they feel like "this is what I could've lived up to", maybe the backlash against those who really don't care so much about this person's death is angst being vented because an opportunity for vicarious thrills has suddenly been lost to them.

      People who don't understand should read this new book "The Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell. He wrote "The Tipping Point". Just the first few chapters will open your mind up to what "genius" is, and what sort of damage can be done to not just one human life but to life and society in general when you push children through the whole "talent" pageant or fail to recognize opportunity (versus the mythological, "inherent" genius) for what it is.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
    2. Re:Funny to see the divide here by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      In some ways he was a bitter old prick whose lasting legacy in my eyes is that I STILL don't have Macromedia Flash on my i-device.

      Okay, that's deserving of +5 Funny.

  47. Beezelbud - Registered 'lusers' aren't better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I think it's about time /. gets rid of the AC policy. If you can't be bothered to make an account, why should you be able to constantly stink this place up with the sort of bile we see in the first few comments to this?" - by Beelzebud (1361137) on Sunday January 15, @04:38PM (#38708108)

    What about misusing mult. registered 'luser' accts used to troll/harass/stalk others?

    (Don't even *TRY* to bullshit me & say it doesn't go on either - it goes on like MAD...)

    E.G. - I've got the MOST "infamous" of the lot here, literally, and with he saying this week I was "RAPED" & more, violating the rules of this site... Doesn't faze him I wrote the GeekNet legal dept. etc. (thus, he's not afraid of breaking the law (in terms of libel or defamation of character, obviously!))

    * In fact, I'm an ac who posts that way consistently (as AC), & I was very happy that folks rode the morons who acted like complete assholes hopefully FEEL that way, & yes, that they voiced their opinions in that regard to the ones acting like asses!

    So please - don't even *TRY* to make it out like cutting off the 'ac' posting identity more prone to being "better people", because I'm dealing with possibly the WORST OF THE LOT in "registered 'lusers'" -> The fool that keeps around 500 bogus alternate registered accounts, in "MichaelKristopeit"...

    APK

    P.S.=> There's also a pack of trolls here, literally ADMITTED trolls (gmhowell, tomhudson, webmistressrachel, squiggleslash, countertrolling, mcgrew, & other registered LUSER 'guises'), that cheat the moderation system, literally, in 2 ways:

    1.) Modding themselves up in collusion/teams

    2.) Modding down those they are stalking/harassing/trolling

    Think it's bullshit? Ok, fine - here's where they LITERALLLY ADMIT TO ALL OF THE ABOVE & how they cheat the mod system here:

    A.) countertrolling telling others how to moddown opponents as registered lusers 1st, then to logout to save your karma/cookie state of your reg'd luser account, & then to troll others via ac replies -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2245866&cid=36491652

    B.) mcgrew stating how he modded up webmistressrachel 5 times, & she's his "partner in crime" around here (probably SAME person with multiple guises is my guess) -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2212152&cid=36361542

    C.) I've literally CAUGHT a fool named clone53421 posting in the same post as clone52431 (notice the #'s appended, not the same)

    & plenty more I've caught doing bogus things around here to "fool the system/game the system"... would you like more? I can list them, in seconds... apk

  48. Did she enjoy childhood? by fleeped · · Score: 1

    What's more saddening is that she died so early that she probably didn't enjoy childhood, and living, that much.
    I wouldn't be sad that from X child prodigies in the world, we now have X-1; that's alright, the world will go on.
    She won't.
    And that's the sad part...

  49. Death be not proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DEATH be not proud, though some have called thee
    Mighty and dreadfull, for, thou art not so,
    For, those, whom thou think'st, thou dost overthrow,
    Die not, poore death, nor yet canst thou kill me.
    From rest and sleepe, which but thy pictures bee, 5
    Much pleasure, then from thee, much more must flow,
    And soonest our best men with thee doe goe,
    Rest of their bones, and soules deliverie.
    Thou art slave to Fate, Chance, kings, and desperate men,
    And dost with poyson, warre, and sicknesse dwell, 10
    And poppie, or charmes can make us sleepe as well,
    And better then thy stroake; why swell'st thou then;
    One short sleepe past, wee wake eternally,
    And death shall be no more; death, thou shalt die.
     

    1. Re:Death be not proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donne and done

  50. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but I don't make a habit of pissing in open graves before the dirt's even shoveled in.

    And I find it reprehensible when others do it out of some sort of misbegotten patriotism, envy or need to prop them selves up by being vile to others.

    Especially in the case when such potential for brilliance is snuffed out so early.

    For all of you who are inexperienced socially I will make things easy and tell you that what forkfail said is a proper human response to what singingjim1 said. Seriously you guys need to know when to apply the saying "if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all."

  51. Why is it that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the most promising people always go first and yet assholes are still amongst us?

    I'm just venting, don't take me too seriously.

    My thoughts are with her family and friends.

    RIP, Arfa Karim Randhawa. :'(

    1. Re:Why is it that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you want to do something big in your life, you must remember that shyness is only the mind." --Arfa Karim Randhawa
      "If you think shy, you act shy. If you think confident you act confident. Therefore never let shyness conquer your mind." --Arfa Karim Randhawa

  52. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Okay, so you're honestly trying to say that any 9 year old could pass that test, if their parents simply "forced" them to learn it by flash cards? Get a grip, indeed.

    You don't know many Asian parents do you?

  53. This journey is over.. by hackus · · Score: 1

    A new one begins.

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  54. Last straw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is it. You people are monsters who do nothing but make half life and portal jokes when your not whining about copyrights. Now you are attacking a child for getting a cert. Of course she had no great work, she didn't have enough time! Shill for microsoft? Ya getting a cert from a company with enormous worldwide market share is certainly a terrible idea.

  55. So do the idiotic and mediocre. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Young death knows no intelligence range, it will take them all.

  56. No Man (or 16 year old girl) is An Island by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No man is an island entire of itself; every man
    is a piece of the continent, a part of the main;
    if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe
    is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as
    well as a manor of thy friends or of thine
    own were; any man's death diminishes me,
    because I am involved in mankind.
    And therefore never send to know for whom
    the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.

    Enjoy your mortality, fellow beings...

  57. Re:The candle ... NO by mythar · · Score: 2

    You obviously don't get the reference, or the respect that the reference implies.

    and i also wouldn't have shown my respect by wishing her a speedy recovery from chemotherapy.

    You're an asshole.

    that is correct, coward.

    i will correct the common misconception that she died from a seizure no matter how tragic it is. i want candles to burn twice as bright AND twice as long, and i'm not afraid to say it.

  58. A very sad day by wjcofkc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Being familiar with this girls story, I came here to say some kind words. I see that they have already been said.

    For those of you with unkind words all I can say is I have been on Slashdot since 1997 and I have never been so embarrassed and ashamed to call myself a part of this community.

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:A very sad day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really? the mix of sociopaths and trolls hasn't really changed over the years...

  59. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know any Asian parents, and I'm Asian, you insensitive clod!

    By the time they get home from work either I'm asleep or studying with my private tutor. I'm lucky if I get an email every other day.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  60. Re:Tag her and bag her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IQ scores don't work that way. You can't be "found to have an IQ well over 200".

  61. Slashdotter's pathological fear of Reddit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What is it with Slashdotters' pathological fear of sites like Reddit? It's as if Slashdotters are living in an alternative reality in which community websites never progressed past 2002, and Slashdot's broken model is the only thing out there. "Let *everyone* moderate? That's preposterous!"

    I even remember when CmdrTaco publicly predicted that Wikipedia would fail. There's this strange fear of relinquishing control around here.

    Hell, look at your post, which is modded up, compared to the post you're replying to, which is -1 Offtopic. Why is his off-topic but you're isn't? Because people who don't like the OP modded it down, while people who don't like Reddit modded you up. Agendas rule the day because the moderator pool is so small.

    1. Re:Slashdotter's pathological fear of Reddit by Lotana · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am one of these people that would rather have the moderation system remain as it is. I honestly don't think I have a "pathological" fear as such of Reddit or any other social site out there. Honestly, I am having trouble comming up with a scenario where anyone can be afraid of some page on the Internet. You can perhaps call us "conservative" for resisting such a major site overhall, but I will argue that there is nothing wrong with having such a point of view.

      I for one am against changing moderation system because this is one of the fundamentals of how Slashdot functions. This is our identity and represents us as a community. Those people that like Reddit's system have already left and now read Reddit. Those that like Digg's way of filtering have left and now part of Digg's community. All the people that remained here are those that are satisfied with the current scheme.

      Yes, there are many flaws with Slashdot's moderation, but there is no such thing as perfection in the real world. All of them, including your favourite Reddit, have their own problems. Question you need to ask is not "Why don't Slashdot becomes like <website>?" but "Do I prefer <website>'s way better than Slashdot's?". If so, just go there instead of making your selfish calls to make changes that will affect great number of people that have a different opinion!

    2. Re:Slashdotter's pathological fear of Reddit by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I am having trouble comming up with a scenario where anyone can be afraid of some page on the Internet.

      goatse? lastmeasure? timecube?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  62. Spelled Out For The Compassionless Morons... by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Here are the reasons why this is a news-worthy item here on Slashdot and why she should be credited for what she did:

    1. The girl was from Pakistan and therefore unlikely to have been afforded similar social & educational privileges than a 16-year old girl in the USA or Europe.

    2. Pakistan is a mainly Muslim country meaning that women have a lower status than men from the moment of birth. Therefore what she did was that little bit more harder for her than for a boy in Pakistan.

    3. It's good to occasionally get a new story from Pakistan where everyone isn't portrayed as either a Taliban terrorist in the mountains or a member of the Pakistan government hiding them.

    4. Maybe if a few more kids in our rich Western countries (I'm in the UK) took an interest in intellectual pursuits like programming, we wouldn't have so many of them dropping unwanted kids or getting addicted to drugs or alcohol. Maybe just one or two of those kids will read this story and take some inspiration from it, possibly change their own lives.

    So now kindly shut the fuck up if you cannot show some compassion.

    --
    Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
    1. Re:Spelled Out For The Compassionless Morons... by Valcrus · · Score: 0

      Don't get me wrong it is a sad thing that happened and much may have been lost due to this, but the info in the story does leave something wanting. Most of the time you hear prodigy and that they have done a few things that are amazing. In this case all we have is that someone passed a test. Is there anything out there about what she did after she passed? All I can find is that one fact and that she received many awards for it.

    2. Re:Spelled Out For The Compassionless Morons... by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not that it's relevant to this story, but as a mainly Linux person, I wonder if her death would have attracted less negative trolling had she been a Red Hat Certified Engineer or a genius BASH shell scripter.

      I don't feel proud as a member of the human race when people turn a suite of software tools into a religion - be they Linux, Microsoft or Apple zealot.

      --
      Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
    3. Re:Spelled Out For The Compassionless Morons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look man, don't make it any worse than it is. She wasn't from a poor family, she was essentially from the one-percenters of Pakistani.

      Locked into the house.
      All fucking year. No teen dating, No lemonade Discos, no teen drinking. Probably no Doom either. Promoting corporate interests.

      That's sad, missing life.

    4. Re:Spelled Out For The Compassionless Morons... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      RHCE would mean bashing, doh, it's RHCE.
      genius shell scripter? well, if the scripts were available then there'd be some praise.

      point being - if there were some work out there, then there would be less bashing and possibly more praising - if there were code that people relied regularly on then there'd be heartfelt thanks. You know, a doom engine clone or whatever - Some code that could be ran and that would stay alive after her passing away.

      So is there?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Spelled Out For The Compassionless Morons... by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 1

      I am an RHCE, you do not need to be an expert shell scripter to pass it - therefore the two are mutually exclusive.

      --
      Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
    6. Re:Spelled Out For The Compassionless Morons... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I am an RHCE, you do not need to be an expert shell scripter to pass it - therefore the two are mutually exclusive.

      You obviously don't need to know logic either.

      For them to be mutually exclusive, expert shell scripters would either automatically fail or be barred from taking the test at all.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    7. Re:Spelled Out For The Compassionless Morons... by ronabop · · Score: 1

      What projects did she contribute to, then? Yeah. thought as much.

  63. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pakistan... the home of Testking and corrupt testing centers.

  64. Re:Tag her and bag her by buddyglass · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Obligatory Hawking reference.

  65. You're Just Thinking of The Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really funning considering /. generally complains when one has to sign-up to random sites in-order to read their articles. 'They're violating my priavcy! Their database could be hacked! I'm being tracked! etc...' Some people don't post enough to feel like it's worth creating an account and remembering new login details. Use something like KeePass? then you can only post from one computer. Use a cloud based service? then you've given all your passwords to a third party. Remember them yourself? that's hard to do for secure passwords for 20+ site you rarely log onto.

    Anyway, you're only trying to hide the problems, not fix them (I know, extremely hard to do). Lets all push those disgruntled people over there so they become ever more disgruntled. When has that ever worked out in the long term?

    Why are you people with accounts making such a big deal about us ACs? If you guys didn't make such a fuss, I would have never even known there were a few bad first posts (which there normally are anyway). Now instead of discussing the girl, half the posts are about ACs. Why can't you raise your viewing threshold one point?

    It's funny to see people on /. crying think of the children when it suites them then bash everyone else doing it in many of the articles.

    One last point: without bad ACs posts, you'd get a more distorted view of the world. Many people feel having distorted views of things is bad in general. Even /. tends to argue against it.

    ~8 year AC poster (1-3 posts a month)

    1. Re:You're Just Thinking of The Children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that I've read the article, i've noticed no one has even bothered to point out the following details:

      1) Microsoft had hired doctors to review her treatment
      2) Her throughts on life in general:
      "If you want to do something big in your life, you must remember that shyness is only [in] the mind," she said. "If you think shy, you act shy. If you think confident you act confident. Therefore never let shyness conquer your mind."

      Can we stop the worthless AC bashing (putting other people down makes you feel better/stronger/important right?) and get back to the main topic?

  66. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

    I was programming at age 9. I was learning the difference between 'serial' and 'random access' mode for files on Apple II Basic. I was setting about trying to write a program to automate my elementary school's checkout system for their little library. I didn't finish it, but that's what I was doing.

  67. Re:Ob by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 1

    Congratulations! In two decades of using Linux you're the first sick fuck who has got me to question the wisdom of that decision.

    --
    Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
  68. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Why is that really all that surprising?

    My son is 8. He's not a very proficient reader yet, though his math skills are very good. He's been mostly home schooled (nothing all too vigorous, which probably attributes to his lack of reading proficiency) but wanted to go to public school this past year.

    However, he has a better grasp of some key IT concepts which my MCSE and college IT/CS/etc. coworkers do not, simply through osmosis. If this girl's parents were both in IT and she had an overt interest in it, I can see how it might be more the case. My son understands things like basic troubleshooting (my primary role, it seems), connectivity, hierarchy, the interaction of components inside the system, and can navigate around in a shell OK.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  69. Hypocrisy... by JohnnyMindcrime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is when you troll gleefully about the death of a teenage Pakistani girl who was a genius with Microsoft stuff but attacked anyone who trolled gleefully when Steve Jobs passed away.

    --
    Windows 10 is great - I used it to download Linux.
    1. Re:Hypocrisy... by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Isn't it also the other way round? If you trolled gleefully when Steve Jobs passed away, it is hypocrisy to criticize others who troll gleefully about the death of a teenage Pakistani girl.

      I have nothing against this girl, I personally think this shouldn't have been a sensational story posted on slashdot.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    2. Re:Hypocrisy... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      It's only hypocrisy if they said that trolling about the death of someone is wrong in general. If they believe that it depends on the person, then it is not hypocrisy.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  70. RIP indeed, but frak those who don't care! by antdude · · Score: 1

    No kidding. For those who don't care, we won't care for them when they die.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:RIP indeed, but frak those who don't care! by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      But that would clearly make you a sociopath...

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    2. Re:RIP indeed, but frak those who don't care! by antdude · · Score: 1

      We are ALL sociopaths. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  71. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I know some people who have personally met Arfa when she came to visit Redmond back in 2006. If she faked the exam, that would have come out pretty quickly in any prolonged conversation on programming topics.

  72. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by billcopc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Have you ever taken that certification exam ? Maybe then you wouldn't be so impressed.

    One must also consider that not everyone is as dumb/irresponsible as the average North American kid. I grew up with other kids that would be considered "mature" by such standards, but really it was perfectly common and expected to learn things from your parents and uncles, instead of parking us in front of a TV. I had an uncle who was studing CS, so by age 2 I was writing my first Hello World program in BASIC. My neighbour was an EE, so naturally his kid was a whiz at electronics and robotics. By the time we hit 3rd grade, we would spend our evenings and weekends porting each other's computer games (he had a C64, I had an Atari).

    Kids don't have any of the distractions and frustrations of us adults. If they are interested in something, they can easily invest 16 hours a day into that passion. They have no bills to pay, no spouses to patronize. Given the kind of harsh parenting seen in many 3rd world countries, I'm surprised we haven't heard of other kids getting an MS cert even earlier than 9. If a kid is bright enough, you could train them to pass the test by the time they're out of diapers - at the expense of their sanity of course.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  73. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He/she could be dyslexic, you presumptive clod!

  74. Re:Tag her and bag her by istartedi · · Score: 1

    28% of all geniuses make perfect guesses at statistics on Slashdot. FWIW, Mozart was a prodigy and died at 35. We need to define "prodigy" and compare it to contemporary mortality figures to get a real answer though.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  75. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by 0137 · · Score: 5, Funny

    tell me about it, i was potty trained via flashcards and now i can't write an exam without pooping EVERYWHERE.

  76. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That same "tragedy" happens to thousands and thousands of 16 year olds all over the world, every day, and has happened for hundreds of thousands of years.

    What makes her more interesting than most of those is the fact that she was a certified geek (albeit one working for the Dark Side).

    To be honest, I don't find the ability to code at 9 particularly impressive; I started playing around with computers at 4 and by 9 I'd actually written a couple of (very simple) games for my ZX Spectrum, with no help from anyone, and before there was any such thing as the internet (just reading code snippets from magazines and trying out stuff). From what I read, her "achievement" was to pass some Microsoft test, which should be trivial if her parents worked in IT and pushed her a bit. Did she ever develop an actual application / game / new algorithm?

    I'm sure she was a lot better at programming than the average 9 year old, but that's only because the average 9 year old's parents steer them in other directions.

  77. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Daniel+Phillips · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am with those who maintain that a Microsoft certification is not Computer Science, and that the wikipedia article is erroneous, misleading and should be corrected. Perhaps by changing the heading from "Computer Science" to "Systems Administration". An impressive achievement for a nine year old to be sure, but not to be ranked with science. Attempting to mischaracterize her achievement that way only sullies it.

    --
    Have you got your LWN subscription yet?
  78. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by xero314 · · Score: 1

    I don't want to degrade this girls achievements by any means, but I'm not particularly impressed by the Microsoft Certification part. By the time I was her age I was not passing Microsoft exams, I was programing in multiple languages including assembly and machine code. This was quite some time ago, before MS had a certification program (may have even been before they existed, but I don't know the dates off hand).

    Again, i'm not at all saying that this girl was any less than impressive, but it has nothing to do with the microsoft certification.

  79. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by IANAAC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I had an uncle who was studing CS, so by age 2 I was writing my first Hello World program in BASIC.

    Sorry, I don't believe you.

    At two years old, you didn't have the motor skill to control a keyboard or a mouse, much less read or write.

  80. Re:Lighten up, Fork. by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    a skilled Windows GUI Cowboy

    She looked more like an Indian to me.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  81. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by ByOhTek · · Score: 2

    Knowing a few people who have gotten that certification (after several tries) - I am fairly comfortable in saying that the test for that, and many similar MS certifications, are on par with some of the harder actuarial examinations. Even a particularly intelligent person will be challanged.

    That being said, it is a lot of memorization, not necessarily analysis. But when you have quick recall to that many situations, if your logical abilities are fairly good, then you will be able to troubleshoot A LOT.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  82. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by decoy256 · · Score: 1

    I wish I had points to mod parent up. I just about cried laughing.

  83. A Microsoft PR gold mine by toby · · Score: 0

    So Microsoft and Saint "I'm an honest rich man! And a hero!" Gates reap free publicity from this kid even in death.

    --
    you had me at #!
  84. Ascension by Nahooda · · Score: 2

    And if i go,
    while you're still here...
    Know that I live on,
    vibrating to a different measure
    -behind a thin veil you cannot see through.
    You will not see me,
    so you must have faith.
    I wait for the time when we can soar together again,
    -both aware of each other.
    Until then, live your life to its fullest.
    And when you need me,
    Just whisper my name in your heart, ...I will be there.

    By Colleen C. Hitchcock

    --
    Sigs suck!
  85. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by moderatorrater · · Score: 2

    You're absolutely correct, it was an amazing accomplishment.

    The reason there's backlash is that certification in computing fields tends to be rather worthless. They're indications of a base level of skill that's much lower than the level needed to actually get programming work done, so they have a bad reputation in the field. In addition, there's often a requirement for a certification that keeps qualified applicants from getting jobs, which is a source of frustration for everyone outside of HR.

    So, while you're correct that it's an accomplishment on her part, the GP is also correct in that what she learned wasn't necessarily skills that are useful in the real world. Without more supporting evidence, calling her a programming prodigy is certainly a stretch.

  86. Re:Software Development by lightknight · · Score: 1

    Hmm. I can see the trolls are multiplying on /. again. Is it because it's an election year, or did a bunch of 14 year-olds guess the password to their parent's AOL account?

    --
    I am John Hurt.
  87. Tragic, but there are no "programming geniuses" by gweihir · · Score: 2

    The death is tragic, but there are no "programming geniuses", it does not work that way. You simply cannot even have the amount of experience to be very, very good at that age. The potential can be there, but not the actual skill. My deduction is that she had very good memory and was drilled to get through that test. Afterwards, my guess would be that she was used basically as a PR asset. Makes sense when you think about it. And in basically all cases like this, when you dig a bit, you find over-ambitious parents.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  88. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tens of thousands of young people in the prime of their life die every day even though they shouldn't have to. Where have your tears been for them?

  89. Re:Software Development by westlake · · Score: 0

    Hmm. I can see the trolls are multiplying on /. again. Is it because it's an election year, or did a bunch of 14 year-olds guess the password to their parent's AOL account?

    That insults both the 14 year old and AOL ---

    which as I remember it from the dial-up days tended to keep things civil.

  90. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by singingjim1 · · Score: 2

    I'm just saying a bunch of people die every single day. You cared about this woman? You knew her? I'm sorry for your loss if so, but in reality you life has not changed and by tomorrow you will have forgotten this person existed and that this exchange even took place.

  91. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by singingjim1 · · Score: 1

    Fine. I'll get off your lawn.

  92. Re:Ob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dunno, it was pretty funny. That doesn't (or shouldn't, anyway, certainly didn't for me) detract from the casual viciousness of life and the pain it can cause.

  93. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps, but I don't make a habit of pissing in open graves before the dirt's even shoveled in.

    How convenient from the standpoint of a consequentialist censor: hold off on saying anything until nobody is listening anymore. Well, I salute all the trolls, because I know that there's no time like the present, the immediate, to say what we want to -- while we too are still alive.

  94. Re:Same about the young kids with high level PHD's by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

    Same about the young kids with high level PHD's and degrees.

    Now if some kind was high along in some kind of a IT apprenticeship then it's a big deal but the degrees over real work and tech school is wrong with IT today.

    CS does not give the skills to do IT work and it's to long in a class room for IT any ways and that some leads to people rolling software / ideas / plans with the knowledge of working with at user end and up.

    theory does help but CS is over loaded with with. Some cert tests are some what theory / way off base from the real work place. Other cert tests can be done by people who are good test takes.

    Your post might carry a bit more weight if you would slow down, check your spelling, and do a bit of proof reading. As it is you appear to be semi-literate at best. No one will take you seriously if they can't even understand what it is that you have written.

    --
    'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  95. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by BasilBrush · · Score: 0

    She got Microsoft Professional Developer certification. But what has she actually developed? A calculator app and a sorting app. That's not so impressive even for a 9 year old.

    The story here is that Microsoft Professional Developer certification is worth next to nothing.

  96. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    You are absolutely correct. Looking at the article from 2005, when she'd got the certification - the only apps she'd programmed were a calculator app and an app that sorted numbers.

    The certification is worthless, and doesn't indicate any sort of prodigy.

  97. Anytime a cute geek girl dies...its a tragedy! by voss · · Score: 1

    There aren't nearly enough cute geek girls in the world that ANYONE here ought to be gleeful about any geek girl dying!

    1. Re:Anytime a cute geek girl dies...its a tragedy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There aren't nearly enough cute geek girls in the world that ANYONE here ought to be gleeful about any geek girl dying!

      There was another geek girl who died in the world? Because that little wog mutt was pretty fucking far from cute.

  98. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by smitty97 · · Score: 2

    Tell that to my 2 year old. He works a mouse just fine, can read a decent amount of words, and can use the remote on the appletv to play Cars or Thomas the Train. Still poops himself though.

    --
    mod me funny
  99. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by BasilBrush · · Score: 2
  100. Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Today is the black day of my life and same for Pakistan because I lost my princess colleague and Pakistan lost her Pakistani." -Gates

    Bill Gates, the chairman of Microsoft, has reportedly approached parents of Arfa Karim, world’s youngest Microsoft Certified Professional (MCP, to offer her treatment in United States at billionaire’s expense.

    It is obvious why he would invest into saving her. I do not fault it. But, I have to point out to anyone looking for some low-hanging fruit to invest into from a utilitarian perspective, there are lives to be saved in Africa for a much lower cost; money is fungible. Just something to consider before that next purchase of an Apple product.

  101. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by DCFusor · · Score: 2

    What's funny is that at that age, when it was far more rare (and there wasn't even a microsoft, gasp) I was programming a PDP-8 and designing and building my own peripherals for it. Truth. Yeah, I did ok in life, even had something to do with VoIP later on - you're probably using my code. But you don't even know my name. Why is it death makes you famous when it can't matter to you anymore. All that skill made me moderately well off (no debt) but... nothing like this, and yes, I'm really that good and have been since the '60s or so. I've certainly seen plenty with one of these certs who I'd prefer the *average* 9 year old to. That's not that special people. Oh, bring on the flames. Some of you who think you're hot shit probably only have that to their names, and no, I'm not gonna hire you unless you can actually do good things. Screw the paper. And get off my lawn.

    --
    Why guess when you can know? Measure!
  102. Re:Plenty of miserable weasels around here on /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, take a deep breath, relax... This is the web, you get all sorts of people here. Yes I've seen some pretty horrible comments on this one, but it seems you're taking everything that's going on here too seriously.

  103. Re:Tag her and bag her by sycodon · · Score: 2

    At this point in time I wish all the ACs would die from a treatable disorder.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
  104. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by tehniobium · · Score: 1

    Just out of curiosity (and failed googling):

    What is the source for: "the only apps she'd programmed were a calculator app and an app that sorted numbers."?

    --
    No kitty, this is my pot pie!
  105. It's NOT just this post though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been going on for ME, personally, for over a year here now (mainly from trolltalk.com people - not only harassing me/stalking me via their registered 'luser' accounts here, but also via ac stalking posts)

    They are:

    gmhowell
    tomhudson
    webmistressrachel
    squiggleslash
    countertrolling
    mcgrew

    (& other registered LUSER 'guises' they have).

    * I am NOT sure if they are just a single user with multiple guises (though I was told that tomhudson = webmistressrachel by others here), OR, if they are a collective of idiots with like mind, that have LITERALLY SAID they enjoy trolling others!

    E.G.->

    "I've been trolling people for 36 years. Why would I stop now? I've also never denied trolling you. Why would I?" - by gmhowell (26755) on Sunday April 17, @05:03AM (#35846218) Homepage

    QUOTED VERBATIM DIRECTLY FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2087330&cid=35846218

    "I never denied trolling you" - by gmhowell (26755) on Tuesday December 14 2010, @01:55AM (#34543612) Homepage Journal

    QUOTED VERBATIM DIRECTLY FROM -> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1907528&cid=34543612

    gmhowell posts journal on trolling myself, years ago now -> http://slashdot.org/journal/266768/the-best-thing-about-trolling-apk

    PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:

    "The best thing about trolling APK?" - http://slashdot.org/journal/266768/the-best-thing-about-trolling-apk

    QUOTED VERBATIM FROM -> http://slashdot.org/journal/266768/the-best-thing-about-trolling-apk

    ---

    gmhowell says he will stop next below (after I got on his case) too:

    "But seriously, I may stop" - by gmhowell on Thursday June 16, @09:38PM (#36470452) Attached to: The best thing about trolling APK?

    and

    "Hmm... Maybe oughta lay off for a while." - by gmhowell (26755) on Thursday June 16, @09:38PM (#36470452) Homepage

    I took him @ his word, & then laid off on retrolling he, but?

    gmhowell starts up YET again (now by AC posts only)!

    Proof? Ok, this week -> http://slashdot.org/journal/276148/now-this-is-entertaining

    APK

    P.S.=> You'd start taking it seriously too, were YOU targetted this way in being constantly harassed/stalked/trolled - In fact, that LAST link shows that gmhowell's been doing that to myself. I know 1 thing:

    Eventually though, & I've done it before?

    I've always gotten the better of dorks like them, only a matter of time, & just like novocaine, it's guaranteed to work, only takes time...

    Kristopeit I'm working on right now as I speak (going to his ISP/BSP, hosting providers, the legal team for this website & more)... I'm going to finish that screwball, whatever it takes... apk

  106. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was able to read and write at the age of two. I could also play piano, if "Twinkle Little Star" counts.

    Not everyone is the same.

  107. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 2

    Here are the requirements for the exam she passed according to this guy. Suffice it to say you need to know a little more then that. If you aren't impressed by that I would hate to be your kid. Clearly setting records just isn't good enough for you.

    --
    -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
  108. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 1

    Screwed up the second link.

    --
    -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
  109. a really big question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who. cares. ?

  110. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

    You mean, the majority of "programmers" at Microsoft are not total frauds themselves?

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  111. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

    Yes, I do. You're welcome to come out of the basement and see for yourself.

  112. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it does not qualify enough to be appreciated.

    At that age, with the right guidance, it is not that difficult to get a focused kid to learn answers to a certificate test like those microsoft certificate programs. What programs did she actually write? Now _THAT_ would tell us if she was a programming prodigy.

  113. I have zero respect for the certification by tlambert · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have zero respect for the certification. It will not buy me in a job interview. I have the slashdot'ers natural inclination to treat MS certification for what it is: someone I don't trust vouching for someone I don't know.

    If you are in an interview with me:

    o Prove you can code
    o Prove you didn't lie on your resume
    o Prove you can communicate with other engineers

    Given all that, she seems like a smart little shit. I would have given her a chance.

    Judging her life after the fact without extra information is not useful, and doing so makes you a dick.

    --Terry

  114. prodogy by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 2

    Never heard of her until she died. Sad. Perhaps her case will help promote health care generally in India. Would be nice if losing a clearly large potential helps put the focus on curing disease (especially the more exotic ones that the west doesn't focus much on).

    That said though I've heard that prodigies often fail to reach their potential. Ie do amazingly well and get into Harvard Law at 15 and than ... nothing. Their career is just like the rest of the Joe Smoes that got their degree when they were 25. I guess as two examples of ones that succeeded: Beethoven and Bobby Fischer. Any others? I guess what I'm saying is they have the intelligence of an adult extremely early but often they don't continue to develop. That is the nature of human development in general from what I understand. 0-4 or so really rapid development. Than more from 14-30 or so. In between and afterwards nothing that special. You learn but your reasoning doesn't improve at a great rate (might even decrease later on even not counting senility. So sad, but one good thing is she'll be remembered for what she was excellent at not as a 70 year old that had a hoo hum career and "oh yeah was the first MS MCP, you know that company from back in the 2010's?".

  115. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol ... looks like microsoft rejected you pretty hard.. haha :D

  116. Who the fuck care ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. She belongs to the Microsoft camp which tried to, - and still trying to, - harm the FOSS movement

    2. She belongs to a sect that worships the Satan

  117. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You're not alone, lot's of kids were writing code at the age of 9 -- I'd bet half of all the over-30 slashdotters learned to program between the ages of 8 and 11.

    Of course, it was much easier to get started back then. There were tons of BASIC programming books targeting that age range in the 80's, and just flipping on the family micro was all it took to get started.

    This is to say nothing of the zillions of type-in programs you'd find in magazines and books like the Magic Micro and Micro Adventure series (the former targeting 1st & 2nd graders!)

    That said, without same the wealth of resources that we had it's a much more impressive feat for a 21st century 9-year-old that it was for a child of the 80's. They're at a significant disadvantage.

  118. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My son is 8. He's not a very proficient reader yet

    Something must be wrong...

    He's been mostly home schooled

    Ah, there it is!

    My friends first child was reading chapter books before she started kindergarten. She's not exceptional, her parents just cared enough to spend an hour or two a day reading to her and teaching her to read. She enjoyed the time she spent snuggled up with her father as he read to her, and the attention she got from playing fun reading games with him.

    Your kid is 8. You home school your child. He can't read.

    You have either failed to grasp the 'school' part of 'home school', you're remarkably lazy, or you just suck at teaching. (I'm not willing to discount a combination of the three.)

    Fuck, pay attention to your kid! Stop reading Slashdot and go teach your child basic skills!

  119. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    I would have been programming at nine, but first I had to locate a teletype connected by modem to Dartmouth Time-Sharing System. Oh, and I had to wait for them to get BASIC reasonably stable.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  120. Re:The candle ... NO by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Who is there to be angry at? Doctors who were trying to save her life? You know, not all tragedies have people you can blame.

    I really dont get why people need a reason to be sad about her death (she had an MCP!) and someone to be mad at (those incompetent doctors). Is this what we have come to? Someone's death is only of note if they were of a particular skill set, and if we can blame someone for it?

  121. too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is too bad.
    she wouldve greatly advanced technology

    in a world full of stupid, it's sad to see a genius come and go so quickly

  122. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    lol ... looks like microsoft rejected you pretty hard.. haha :D

    Actually Google did, but I am not dissing them.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  123. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by BenJCarter · · Score: 1

    OMG I love the Interwebs, they make me LOL!

    --
    For in politics, as in religion, it is equally absurd to aim at making proselytes by fire and sword. - Publius
  124. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Yes, I do. You're welcome to come out of the basement and see for yourself.

    I have seen their products. It's their greatest strength -- it's impossible to emulate incompetence. As far as I know, everyone who is not a fraud at Microsoft, is placed into their expensive zoo Microsoft Research and is paid to not work for Microsoft competitors.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  125. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by ormondotvos · · Score: 1

    I'm currently raising a 19 month old, and a 25 month old. They pick out their own programs from the TV guide online, and nuke their own food. Pushing buttons, and pairing numbers isn't that hard. I don't find them oddly proficient.

  126. Choice is yours. by luk3Z · · Score: 0

    Computer or health/life. Choice is yours.

    --
    Recipes for USA bankrupt - http://tinypaste.com/0d66f dd = dollar deluge (printed in the infinity)
  127. Expert medical care by Tymst · · Score: 1

    "Two weeks ago her outlook appeared to improve. In recent weeks, Microsoft had stepped in to help provide expert medical care."

    Well, isn't that awkward.

  128. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 0

    "if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all."

    All right. No more criticism, jokes, or insults. Some people don't like it. Therefore, it should never be done.

    Let's just ban all words. Someone could take offense to one of them. That would bring about the apocalypse. Anyone who disagrees isn't a 'proper' human!

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  129. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are waiting for you to pass ... eagerly.

  130. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    Actually Google did, but I am not dissing them.

    Failing to meet Google standards instead of failing to meet Microsoft standards isn't really something to be proud of.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  131. The article is a troll by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful

    She is called a programming prodigy but no evidence is given, the only "evidence" is a MS certification on a site where MS certification is a gigantic red flag. Certification in general tends not to be popular and the ones from MS are often considered to have less value then the paper they were written upon if the paper was made of shit.

    The article writer probably knows this and also knows that controversy sells ad impressions.

    The simple fact is that a young person died who had some minor accomplishments that most on /, simply do not value since they know adults with the same who are the waste of IT. Maybe if the article poster had given some examples of actual code she had written? Something that would actually impress other developers? But the only links I seen so far are to software that is frankly not that impressive to people from a generation that had to create their own computer from scratch. Don't forget, there are REAL rocket scientists on Slashdot. People that built their own home computer before there were home computers are supposed to be all impressed with a kid that made a calculator in a modern development environment? Not even a very good calculator.

    It might be hard for a 9 year old to do that particular exam but so what? Coders judge other coders on code, not certificates.

    All this is to me is a young person who died who seems to have gotten some minor press attention for an achievement I do not value. Show me her 3D engine, new sorting algorithm, something that makes her a true child prodigy and not just a very boring kid who read a training manual cover to cover.

    Sad she died, but millions die each day. What makes her worthy of special attention? I just don't like fake emotion from people who shed tears over this but never made a donation to stop people from dying or to cure a disease. Slashdot doesn't need human interest stories.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  132. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    I had an uncle who was studing CS, so by age 2 I was writing my first Hello World program in BASIC.

    Sorry, I don't believe you.

    At two years old, you didn't have the motor skill to control a keyboard or a mouse, much less read or write.

    He obviously just made a typo there.

    I had an uncle who was studing CS, so by age 2I was writing my first Hello World program in BASIC.

    That sounds a lot more plausible, especially considering his lacking grammar.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  133. Re:Tag her and bag her by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    He was formally tested.
    How else would you determine an IQ score?

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  134. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

    Actually Google did, but I am not dissing them.

    Failing to meet Google standards instead of failing to meet Microsoft standards isn't really something to be proud of.

    I think, they just were acting like a bunch of dicks, considering that my current job involves everything an order of magnitude more complex than Google does.
    At least they were not giving me idiotic puzzles to test if my mind works exactly the same way as theirs.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  135. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Psychotria · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I did ok in life, even had something to do with VoIP later on - you're probably using my code. But you don't even know my name.

    Umm, I think we do, Doug

  136. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by tbird81 · · Score: 2

    I'm just saying a bunch of people die every single day. You cared about this woman? You knew her? I'm sorry for your loss if so, but in reality you life has not changed and by tomorrow you will have forgotten this person existed and that this exchange even took place.

    The point is that when we hear of someone young and promising dying, we have this feeling called "empathy". I realise that your Asperger's makes it a difficult thing to comprehend. We think of children we know, we think of others we have lost at a young age, we think of what her parents must be feeling. It's part of being human.

    I'm sorry if it's not logical, Spock.

  137. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Trogre · · Score: 1

    You are 100% correct, however the latter is the only reason you read about it.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  138. Re:The candle ... NO by mythar · · Score: 2

    Who is there to be angry at? Doctors who were trying to save her life? You know, not all tragedies have people you can blame.

    not who; what. i get pissed when bad things happen to nice people. i may even turn my anger to constructive use, but this should not be construed as finger-pointing.

    I really dont get why people need a reason to be sad about her death (she had an MCP!) and someone to be mad at (those incompetent doctors). Is this what we have come to? Someone's death is only of note if they were of a particular skill set, and if we can blame someone for it?

    are you asking why i had an emotional reaction to this news, or do you really not know that in many cultures solemnity is the appropriate reaction to news of someone's death?

  139. Gift taken away by kokoko1 · · Score: 1

    Quoting from the news paper her uncle said just a nice words "Speaking to The Express Tribune, Major Ahsan Randhawa, Arfa’s uncle, articulated the family’s grief as best as he could. “We are grieving her loss but she was a strong child”, he said – adding “she was God’s gift to us and now she has returned to Him”. May Allah peace on her and family

    --
    http://askaralikhan.blogspot.com/
  140. I should stop watching movies like antitrust... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "[...] became the world’s youngest Microsoft Certified Professional at 9 years old [...] Two weeks ago her outlook appeared to improve. In recent weeks, Microsoft had stepped in to help provide expert medical care."

    I'm probably just reading too much into things, but...

    Ballmer: "Hey, this 10-year old is great! Awesome! And best of all she gives loads of PR to our company!"
    MS lackey: "... She's 16. And she recently switched over to Linux and is telling everyone how hopelessly dated our dev tools are!"
    Ballmer: "... WTF??? *throws chair* I'm fucking going to kill her!!!"

  141. Mozart schmozart. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Mozart was composing single draft sonatas at an earlier age. What's your point?

    Mozart schmozart. If he'd waited till he was older he might not have put too many notes in.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  142. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New slogans?

    "We can certify you before everyone else but then we'll have to kill you"
    "Microsoft Certification: Killing child prodigies since 2012"
    "You can never be too young for Microsoft Certification - or death"
    "Microsoft Certification: Children are dying to get it"

    While being true, none of these are likely be chosen.

  143. Doesn't work on carbon units, you duMa$ses by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    In recent weeks, Microsoft had stepped in to help provide expert medical care.

    That's the problem, right there.

    They probably tried to switch her off and on again.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  144. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    Why is parent marked as troll?

    It's sad that she wasted so much time of her short life on this stuff...

  145. Re:Nob /|\ by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    Let's get this right - you base your choice of OS on whether other users of it affect a sufficient display of emotional platitudes over someone they didn't know? I can almost imagine Tony Blair calling her "The People's Programmer" when I read your bleatings.

    P.S. I hope you're not using ReiserFS.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  146. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by laejoh · · Score: 1

    Flash cards? Shouldn't that have been Silverlight? We're talking Microsoft here, aren't we?

  147. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

    I think, they just were acting like a bunch of dicks, considering that my current job involves everything an order of magnitude more complex than Google does.

    Maybe they were looking for somebody that doesn't overcomplicate simple problems.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  148. Accept Death by sakari · · Score: 0

    My heartfelt condolences to her family. She was so young and so gifted, with such a future ahead of her. :(

    Not trying to be cold here, but death is part of life. There is no future really, there is only this moment. Why grief for something that is not ?

    Accept the fact that you and me are going to die and live life to the fullest. She sounds like she did just that. We all make choices in our lives, even the moment when we die. We are all one and playing a game where death may not seem like it is our choice, but ultimately everything we do and everything we are born with we have chosen. Death is natural.

  149. Re:This raises some interesting questions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes.

  150. One less MCP in the world by sentimental.bryan · · Score: 1

    Take that any way you like.

  151. Re:The candle ... NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The complications were not necessarily avoidable. Medical science, unlike mathematics, is not exact - there are few perfect answers to a given situation.
    It is very sad that her life had to end this way, however there is nobody to blame here. They would have had to have a constantly monitored camera in her trachea to catch the bleeding as soon as it happened. Even then, the chances of correcting the complication in time to save her would have been unlikely.

  152. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Is it the long list or the long words that are impressing you most? Perhaps you'll be less impressed when you find out that all these "evaluate", "recommend", and "demonstrate"s all come down to answering a multiple choice question.

  153. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Snirt · · Score: 1

    TFA article says she had photographic memory, Good memory != creativity/productivity. It is a huge accomplishment when I compare myself with her..At that age I had no single certificate on my ass let alone any computer knowledge- learned how to use a computer when I was 18.

  154. my condolences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope her family can stand the pain. May her rest in piece.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8goV81mY7cs

  155. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Snirt · · Score: 1

    RIP young girl. Fuck people who treat the late girl as if she was MICROSOFT itself. She just happened to have taken one of their exams...may be her parents recommended her to take MCSE.

  156. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DavidSell, ByOhTek, antitithenai, Bonch, Dtech and others are psuedonyms/sockpuppets used by the Waggener Edstrom rapid response team employed by MS to astroturf discussions in favour of MS and to attack any point of view which isn't favourable to MS and supportive of their interests.

    http://waggeneredstrom.com/about/approach

    Mod accordingly

  157. Epic quote by Jamel+Toms · · Score: 1

    That was an epic quote at the end about shyness.

  158. Re:fyuckfyuck mod-points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lame.

  159. Proof even Microsoft can't really fix Outlook. by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    >> Two weeks ago her outlook appeared to improve. In recent weeks, Microsoft had stepped in to help provide expert medical care.

  160. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by apow · · Score: 1

    Logged in just to say that before calling people liars, check your facts.

    I was reading a bunch of words before being 2 years old. I was 4 when I got my first computer (a MSX) and learned to create simple programs reading only the BASIC manual... so not impossible at all I'm afraid.

    --

    Rio de Janeiro's dwellers are stupid. No, really.
  161. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by DeathFromSomewhere · · Score: 1
    It's the fact that she was 9 when she did it.

    If you aren't impressed by that I would hate to be your kid. Clearly setting records just isn't good enough for you.

    --
    -1 overrated isn't the same thing as "I disagree".
  162. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    LOL Well played, sir!

  163. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by strikethree · · Score: 1

    At two years old, you didn't have the motor skill to control a keyboard or a mouse, much less read or write.

    I am not entirely certain that is true about the motor skills. I was riding a bicycle without training wheels at two (but still in diapers. Heh). I was also able to diagnose a friends pedal car (camaro?) at two years of age. I reasoned out how the device was provided motive power, flipped it over, and put the chain back on its tracks.

    The reading and writing would be very amazing. I am certain I was not even close to writing (but possibly close to reading) at that age.

    strike

    --
    "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  164. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by gknoy · · Score: 2

    How does one verify such a claim? I don't even know what evidence to look for.

  165. You obviously haven't heard of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gennady korotkevich, have you?
    http://petr-mitrichev.blogspot.com/2009/10/gennady-korotkevich.html
    He's only 16, yet he is the ranked second in the world in topcoder.
    http://community.topcoder.com/tc?module=MemberProfile&cr=22263204

    1. Re:You obviously haven't heard of... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      There are always artificial metrics that allow such claims, but they are meaningless for reality except in very specific and limited circumstances.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:You obviously haven't heard of... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      ... and you forget that there are quite a few people that are good at this thing that have no interest in topcoder at all. I would estimate orders of magnitude more than are in topcoder. Typically that will be people a little older, with jobs and experience that would find the business model of topcoder ridiculous. Most people good at an engineering discipline have zero interest in doing it competitively. That is something for kids. So my point is that you will not find the very top people at topcoder. There may still be reasonably good ones with large egos there. And nobody said a 16 year old could not be pretty good at this. But being a "genius" is something different.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  166. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by IANAAC · · Score: 1

    Logged in just to say that before calling people liars, check your facts.

    I was reading a bunch of words before being 2 years old. I was 4 when I got my first computer (a MSX) and learned to create simple programs reading only the BASIC manual... so not impossible at all I'm afraid.

    You do realize there's a HUGE difference developmentally between a two year old and a four year old, right? Linguistically, physically, emotionally... HUGE difference.

  167. Re:Tag her and bag her by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    <quote><p>At this point in time I wish all the ACs would die  from a treatable disorder.</p></quote>

    ?

  168. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by treeves · · Score: 1

    Indeed. How does AC know this? DavidSell's and antitithenai's comment histories fit with AC's assertion, but ByOhTek and Bonch's comment histories suggest that they are not at all fixated on MS-related stories.

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  169. R.I.P. by DemonGenius · · Score: 1

    It's so sad to see someone pass away who very well would have contributed something great to the profession. Something needs to be done to remember this young girl. Anyone want to name a useful application after her?

  170. Re:Lighten up, Fork. by Anarchduke · · Score: 1
    Thats' true, any reasonably smart high school student COULD have jumped through those hoops. How many 9 year olds though?

    To answer your question, why so emotional, I turn to the words of John Donne:

    No man is an island,
    Entire of itself.
    Each is a piece of the continent,
    A part of the main.
    If a clod be washed away by the sea,
    Europe is the less.
    As well as if a promontory were.
    As well as if a manner of thine own
    Or of thine friend's were.
    Each man's death diminishes me,
    For I am involved in mankind.
    Therefore, send not to know
    For whom the bell tolls,
    It tolls for thee.

    A loss of a child is a loss of all she might have accomplished, both directly and as a result of her interaction with others. Try and take a moment and reflect on the pain her family feels; The sense of loss her friends and neighbors feel. Sure I may not have known her, but she was someone I gave my respect to years ago when I learned that she had passed the MCP exam at age 9.
    As a father, I can't help but empathize with her parents who must be devastated to have her light snuffed out so early on. They will never be able to see all that she could become. They will never see her smile or laugh again. They unique way she might have frowned when concentrating or any other mannerism that screams out individuality. All gone and only memories are left. All her promise is lost. Only emptiness remains.

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  171. Oh the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A community that regularly toutes the importance of education (especially in math and sciences) and rants about how stupid and immature the younger generation is nowadays yet...

    When a story is posted about the passing of an individual who very obviously valued their education and gained recognition at such a young age by siezing oppourtunities given to her...

    Part of the same community responds with: "So what?".
    Part of the same community responds with: "Psh it was only a MS Cert, she doesn't deserve any respect from me".

    I sense bitterness and a lack of empathy.

  172. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry Dad...

  173. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does Microsoft encourages child labour now?

  174. Re:The first four comments are disgusting? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    we have this feeling called "empathy".

    What makes you think the one who you replied to doesn't? What makes you think that they don't feel empathy for people that they actually know? Personally, I find it difficult to believe that many people really are saddened by her death. I don't know how they're feeling, but I suspect they're nothing more than pretty words.

    Asperger's

    The number of pretend psychologists here who try to insult others by (likely incorrectly) diagnosing mental disorders seems to be staggering.

    The fact that someone seems to be more in control of their emotions than you are doesn't make them a sociopath, emotionless, or anything of the sort.

    It's part of being human.

    They're aliens!

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  175. Re:Gosh... by davesque · · Score: 1

    Why the heck did you mod my comment troll??

  176. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    He's dyslexic. I suppose that might have something to do with it, yes? We read every night and several times a day. We've been encouraging his reading and actively instructing him since he was 5.

    He's able to do long division without a problem. Did I mention he's able to understand and use 'advanced' concepts like UNIX pipes?

    (You do realize that girls typically mature quicker intellectually than boys, right?)

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  177. brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my name is ali raza for fifteen years i lived in pakistan and now i am 15 and living in england 2 days ago when i heard about arfas death i became very sad and when i read about her information i cried lods i dont know why but i still consider her as my older sister if anyone from her family finds this post please contact me on aliraz1 at hotmail.co.uk because iwant to know more about my sister please ... i pray to god that she gets peace in her grave and a nice and massive house in jannat pleasse contact me

  178. Re:Tag her and bag her by VanGarrett · · Score: 1

    It's been a very long time since I've had the story related to me. I don't recall the actual number, only that it was above 200; in the 220s, possibly. In any case, his parents had taken him to a psychologist, who had him take an IQ test.

  179. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Correction: at two years old, *YOU* didn't have the motor skills to operate a computer.

    I am not you. Some might say I was a gifted child, others would say I'm just an encyclopedic asshole. I say it's all about perspective.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  180. Re:Certified Microsoft Professional by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Oh, I could type but I wasn't handwriting. I could manage block letters by age 3, which I remember quite well because I labeled my copy of the Michael Jackson VHS. It probably took me 10 minutes though, and lacked vowels: "MKL JKSN". I bet my mother still has that tape somewhere.

    I could read the BASIC book, not with a scholarly command of the English language, but enough to understand most concepts. For any parts I didn't understand, I could simply type out the code samples and figure things out by intuition. Keep in mind, this was BASIC, a procedural language. Each line of code has a direct and immediate result, a pattern any sane child can understand. I didn't figure out OOP until my early teens...

    Handwriting (cursive) didn't happen until much, much later. Heck, I still can't write anything legible in cursive. It was never a priority for me as I was typing 40 wpm by the time I hit grade 2 - much to the dismay of the computer tutor, as I spent most of my time pounding out elaborate sketches for that poor turtle. How many kids do you know who asked for a LOGO cartridge for their 6th birthday ? And an Assembler cartridge for their 8th ? :)

    And yet, for all my computer wizardry, I was most envious of the neighbour's electronic skills. I could create my own crude versions of arcade games, but he was building freakin' robots with remotes and lights and buzzers! Robots &gt> sprites.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com