Slashdot Mirror


New Cable Designed To Deter Copper Thieves

Hugh Pickens writes "Pervasive thefts of copper wire from under the streets of Fresno, California have prompted the city to seal thousands of its manhole covers with concrete. In Picher, Oklahoma, someone felled the town's utility poles with chain saws, allowing thieves to abscond with 3,000 feet of wire while causing a blackout. The theft of copper cables costs U.S. companies $60 million a year and the FBI says it considers theft of copper wire to be a threat to the nation's baseline ability to function. But now PC World reports that a U.S. company has developed a new cable design that removes almost all the copper from cables in a bid to deter metal thieves. Unlike conventional cables made from solid copper, the GroundSmart Copper Clad Steel Cable consists of a steel core bonded to a copper outer casing, forming an equally effective but far less valuable cable by exploiting the corrosion-resistance of copper with the conductive properties of steel. 'Companies trying to protect their copper infrastructure have been going to extreme measures to deter theft, many of which are neither successful nor cost effective,' says CommScope vice president, Doug Wells. 'Despite efforts like these, thieves continue to steal copper because of its rising value. The result is costly damage to networks and growing service disruptions.' The GroundSmart Copper Clad Steel cable is the latest technical solution to the problem of copper theft, which has included alternatives like cable etching to aid tracing of stolen metal and using chemicals that leave stains detectable under ultra-violet light. However the Copper Clad Steel strikes at the root of the problem by making the cable less susceptible to theft by both increasing the resistance to cutting and drastically decreasing the scrap value."

668 comments

  1. Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Eventually, the thieves will take care of themselves.

    1. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by sjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Based on the Darwin slush pile, I'd say electrifying them is doing a fair job of it.

    2. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not fast enough.

    3. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Cylix · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I used to work with some fairly high powered transmitters here and there. Funny thing about large antennas is they tend to be located in lovely remote areas. Generally, the places where no one lives and consequently a great target for moronic thieves. Depending your point of you view you could say it was very fortunate our equipment always needed maintenance or was always failing. Consequently, we spent many events at an uncomfortable distance to the population. Being occupied during the day and night was a great deterrent to douche bags. (I know because after we left the thieves moved in like jackals I'm told)

      On one occasion it looked like someone had started to cut the copper from air conditioning unit, but gave up for some unknown reason. Now, what I had been waiting for was an attempted theft at the coax line for any number of transmitters. There was a metric crap ton of this and the word coax does not lend credit to the thickness of these particular runs. Such an act would create an immediate alarm and nor would it be fun to be on the receiving end of the line. The return feedback during the process would disengage the transmission, but not before baking a few fleshy components.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    4. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by smpoole7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Heh. I feel for you. Been there, done it. But I'll tell you this -- we get hit just as frequently at our big 100,000 watt FMs in Birmingham as we do at the remote sites. My colleague at the Clear Channel site right next to our FM on Red Mountain in Birmingham has video of a guy jumping the fence, clipping a handful of copper, and then gracefully jumping back over the fence, into his car and down the hill -- all in less than a minute. By the time the cops arrived, he was long gone.

      The cameras at that same Clear Channel site also provided a (somewhat scary) image of a different copper thief shooting out the lights before proceeding with his theft. He got caught, though, because even though he was wearing a mask, you could see his (unmasked) girlfriend crouching in the trees. She was identified and later sang like a canary when she was brought in for questioning.

      These guys know how long the police response time is and make sure they can grab and scoot before they can get caught. The deputies who investigated our big theft at a 50,000 watt AM a couple of years ago said the best way to catch them was to set a trap (but even then, they got discouraged because the thieves would spend a few months in jail, then be right back out to steal again).

      The deputies told me that on a slow day, they'll actually cruise the neighborhood with the windows down, sniffing for the smell of burning plastic. Whenever thieves steal telecom cable, they often try to burn off the insulation before scrapping it to get a better price.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    5. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by sjames · · Score: 1

      I understand that RF burns are quite painful and slow to heal.

    6. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by kimvette · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Plutonium is only mildly radioactive thanks to its long half life. Cesium-137 would be a far better deterrent.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    7. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by JoshuaZ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Unfortunately, a combination of desperation and ignorance does make thieves sometimes go after radioactive materials without realizing. And sometimes people die. The most severe such incident occurred in Goainia in Brazil in 1987 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goi%C3%A2nia_accident. Multiple bystanders were hurt. Four people ended up dying, and many more developed radiation sickness and had long-term health problems as a result. Plutonium would be a particularly bad choice in this context even if it were cheap because it looks just like a regular metal in most conditions. (And yes, I know your comment isn't really serious.)

    8. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Fjandr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The last bit is why it's increasingly being made illegal for scrap dealers to purchase burnt cable.

    9. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by froggymana · · Score: 4, Funny

      Plutonium is only mildly radioactive thanks to its long half life. Cesium-137 would be a far better deterrent.

      What about having a tube around the wire that is filled with white phosphorus? If they mess with the wire, they start on fire!

      --
      "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
    10. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by darth+dickinson · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow another Alabama Slashdotter :)

    11. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by kimvette · · Score: 2

      Nice! Now people are thinking!
      But better yet - how about a sintered cladding aluminum and iron oxides?

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    12. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      What about having a tube around the wire that is filled with white phosphorus? If they mess with the wire, they start on fire!

      Too fast - it only gets the lowest-end personnel, leaving the dealers and traffickers unscathed.

      What we really need to do is encapsulate ebola virus in the plastic sheathing - do it in such a way that skin contact releases it.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    13. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by the_raptor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most of them don't care. It is pretty obvious when someone is a copper thief.

      I think anything less than full photo registration of sellers, and a bureaucracy to make sure sure no scap is being "laundered", is about the only way to stop it. However that would probably cost more than the copper thieves do.

      --

      ========
      CINC, 4th Penguin Legion
    14. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      I doubt the friction from the sawzall would be enough to ignite it. Interesting idea, though!

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    15. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by rve · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention the fact that plutonium is far more valuable than copper. Thieves from all over the world, and possibly from other worlds, would hurry over to come and steal the plutonium clad wires.

    16. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by xenobyte · · Score: 2

      Just use a multiple step ignition... Should do the trick. Nothing like the smell of burning thermite and copper thieves in the morning!

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    17. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Shadin · · Score: 1

      I suppose we do exist.

    18. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steeling infrastructure today is like steeling horses in Wild West time - eventually someone is bound to lose life or limb because of blackout or communications gone deaf, or railroad signalization missing. It deserves same punishment as Wild West time horse stealing (tall tree, short cable ... erm, rope, that is).

    19. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by digitig · · Score: 4, Funny

      Steeling infrastructure today is like steeling horses in Wild West time

      What, they made horses out of steel with just a thin cladding (of hide?) in order to deter thieves?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    20. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Adding extra beuracracy to the sale process won't help...
      Thieves will still find unscrupulous outlets to sell their wares, and this will create an opportunity for greater profits operating such an outlet.
      It will also push the price of copper even higher, further encouraging theft.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    21. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The sad part is for this to actually be effective the thieves have to be smart enough to know the difference and when you are talking copper thieves you are usually talking methheads....not the brightest bulbs on the best of days. All they are gonna get is a shitload of cut lines followed by finding the line half melted in a ditch somewhere when brainiac figures out it isn't worth scrapping.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    22. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

      wrap it with magnesium or white phosphorous, then insulate it from the atmosphere. once the cable is cut, the oxygen/moisture would ignite the primary and produce heat enough to trigger the termite.

      --
      What ? Me, worry ?
    23. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of them don't care. It is pretty obvious when someone is a copper thief.

      I think anything less than full photo registration of sellers, and a bureaucracy to make sure sure no scap is being "laundered", is about the only way to stop it. However that would probably cost more than the copper thieves do.

      Also, won't work and would cast more then simply offering a bounty to the Salvage Yards that is greater then the scrap of stolen copper.

    24. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by jimmydigital · · Score: 4, Funny

      Eventually, the thieves will take care of themselves.

      I'm sure that in 1985 plutonium is available in every corner drug store, but in 2012 it's a little hard to come by. Just ask Iran... plus their scientists have a tendency to spontaneously blow up.

      --
      Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. -HLM
    25. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Yup, the hospital near me lost its high-speed Internet link and had to fall back to the slow one for a day because copper thieves tried to steal one of their lines. The one that they dug up was the fibre, and the one that kept working was the copper. I've heard a lot of reports of fibre being stolen because thieves aren't intelligent enough to tell the difference between it and copper (or, even if they are, they can't tell until they've cut through it, which doesn't really help).

      Given the low return on investment from copper theft, no one particularly intelligent is going to be participating.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    26. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, let's set out to injure the poor and desperate instead of going after the real crooks - the scrap metal dealers who knowingly buy stolen property in large quantities and are the ones really getting rich. Seriously, close down that market and the thefts will drop off overnight.

    27. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by GauteL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "My colleague at the Clear Channel site right next to our FM on Red Mountain in Birmingham has video of a guy jumping the fence, clipping a handful of copper, and then gracefully jumping back over the fence, into his car and down the hill -- all in less than a minute. By the time the cops arrived, he was long gone."

      If the thief only got a handful of copper and he was escaping by car, what is the chance that it actually cost him about as much in fuel and car maintenance to steal that copper as he got in scrap value? At the very least he would have made considerably more per hour to work in McDonalds.

    28. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by LiMikeTnux · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The return can be quite well if you know what you are doing. When I worked in Springfield, IL as an apartment maintenance guy, we had a rash of air conditioner coil thefts. So much so that on a lot of our buildings we had moved to roof mounted units. The guy stealing the copper knew exactly what to unbolt to slide that coil right out and run. We were not the only apartments to lose these, either. Even businesses were getting hit.

      --
      yap
    29. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Bugger white phosphorous - if you're going to go for that then use something like nickel tetracabonyl or dimethyl mercury. You know once the thieves had been hit once with that the problem would soon solve itself.

      Toxic enough for them to have time to put their affairs in order, but not too toxic that you have to deal with the dead body on your own property.

    30. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Frangible · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ... and that's not the only one. Here's another example of thieves merrily plasma torching their way through radiation warning signs and tungsten / lead shielding to get a source to sell to the disreputable scrap metal industry. Did I mention the GIANT RADIATION WARNING SIGNS?

      There are many such noted incidents, but there are many that go unnoticed. A worker at a French nuclear plant bought a watch using steel pins mixed with a Co-60 source one of these idiots stole, and this was only found when he wore it to work where radiation monitoring is required. No one knows who was exposed or killed earlier in the supply chain.

      As far as the poster blaming Brazil below, this happens here in the good ol' USA as well.

      And this will keep happening, as long as laws are not enforced and thieves continue to have such a willing market in disreputable scrap metal dealers

      More than the guilty parties have been exposed to dangerous levels of radiation in every single one of these incidents. Scrap metal thieves literally kill people.

    31. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that plutonium is far more valuable than copper. Thieves from all over the world, and possibly from other worlds, would hurry over to come and steal the plutonium clad wires.

      I, for one, welcome our new copper-stealing interstellar-travelling overlords.

    32. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by swalve · · Score: 1

      In Chicago, I'm seeing more and more buildings with razor wire along the perimeter of roofs. It's ugly, and really bums me out.

    33. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by hypertex · · Score: 2

      Pole line stolen three different times last year by three differing thieves, several miles total. They all get caught because the scrap yard requires ID and imposes a delay. FYI, when the line goes down, speed is reduced until crews can arrive on the scene. What is needed is education because each successive thief is unknown to the previous one. No Darwin type evolution can take place because the thieves are completely independent of each other.

    34. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      you don't need to smell for plastic.. burning copper has its own very distinct, nasty, and toxic smell.

    35. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    36. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What in the world possessed you to move there? It can't be the education, nor the dental plan...

    37. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Shit. Imagine that happening if the hospital's doing some kind of remote surgery over their fiber link.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    38. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by nitehawk214 · · Score: 2

      The return can be quite well if you know what you are doing. When I worked in Springfield, IL as an apartment maintenance guy, we had a rash of air conditioner coil thefts. So much so that on a lot of our buildings we had moved to roof mounted units. The guy stealing the copper knew exactly what to unbolt to slide that coil right out and run. We were not the only apartments to lose these, either. Even businesses were getting hit.
      --
      furries did it!

      One would think seeing the guy in the mascot suit with carrying wire cutters would tip you off.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    39. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      But then you'd have mutant pigeons.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    40. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The deputies told me that on a slow day, they'll actually cruise the neighborhood with the windows down, sniffing for the smell of burning plastic. Whenever thieves steal telecom cable, they often try to burn off the insulation before scrapping it to get a better price.

      When I take my 4x4 for an offroad spin in random places out in the middle of nowhere I often run into big piles of power line insulation.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    41. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a Darwin award story about thieves who tried to steal a brand new steel water-tower - first time they broke in (or rather underneath) it was just to scout around. Second time they broken in, it was to drive a pickup truck underneath, and use cutting gear to cut through the supports. Unfortunately, between their two visits, the water tower had been filled to capacity, and they had failed to estimate the compaction force of water tower. Their truck was a write-off.

    42. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it'll take 24 thousand years just to get rid of *1/2* the thieves. . .

    43. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Aye, the way to defeat this would simply be to "launder" copper. It would mean selling it to a fence who'd melt it down into bars, slag, etc. Really ingenious ones could get equipment and make them into pipes or something plausible as a good cover. All it would do is add to the cost.

      The best way to deter crime is to have a better social safety net in place and pull the economy out of the shitter.

    44. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      What in the world possessed you to move there?

      Hmm...could be quality of life? Friendliness of the people, knowing your neighbor and all? Living near the Gulf, and getting great seafood? Not freezing your ass off for 3/4 of the year? The food in general?

      I dunno...but whatever it is, there certainly is NO shortage of yankees moving here down south to live in recent decades.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    45. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Perfect! We coat the wires in plutonium, and any copper thieves will spontaneously explode! BRILLIANT!

    46. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      If the thief only got a handful of copper and he was escaping by car, what is the chance that it actually cost him about as much in fuel and car maintenance to steal that copper as he got in scrap value? At the very least he would have made considerably more per hour to work in McDonalds.

      That's assuming the car wasn't stolen, or the gas used wasn't. I find it truly amazing how much thought some people put into figuring out ways to make a dishonest living. I would imagine that many drug dealers would make fantastic CEOs if they had grown up under different circumstances. And vice-versa.

    47. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I imagine remote surgery would have a massive bandwidth reservation, so if that happened then everyone else's email and remote electronic record access would go to not available instead of slow.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    48. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      You can just sell them pinball parts. They won't know the difference.

    49. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Nimey · · Score: 1

      No, you don't understand. What if the thieves do this and knock the hospital completely offline but for some old dial-up modems they use for CC terminals?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    50. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's better when they die on your property, so the bodies can be processed by a taxidermist for use as a scare-crook. Imagine a feral pose like a bear.

    51. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Steeling infrastructure today is like steeling horses in Wild West time

      What, they made horses out of steel with just a thin cladding (of hide?) in order to deter thieves?

      nope, the horse stealers were executed. today, we can't do that. bit a pity

    52. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Darwinian self-eximinationists don't read those types of newsletters anyway.

    53. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Smart thieves wear white collars?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    54. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Maybe mix some pot or THC in with the materials. Drug laws are pretty fierce.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    55. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because that would make the cable a giant white phosphorus fuse? The methhead cutting the cable would certainly ignite and subsequently burn all to hell, but once the white phosphorus was ignited, it would quickly burn up all your copper the entire length of the cable run.

    56. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On top of that, the solution seems to be that we need to re-wire the entire country in this companies "proprietary??" new wire.

    57. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by fiore42 · · Score: 2

      Steeling infrastructure today is like steeling horses in Wild West time

      What, they made horses out of steel with just a thin cladding (of hide?) in order to deter thieves?

      'course they did. Bon Jovi, who obviously doesn't get enough credit for his deep historical research, even wrote a song about it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SRvCvsRp5ho&ob=av3e

    58. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      No amount of desperation present in this country justifies cutting off 911 service for hundreds of people, as has happened before in copper theft cases. Sure, go after the dealers, also go after their buyers (make sure they start enforcing traceability) AND go after the thieves.

      Actually, this new cable seems like a great idea, I suppose the company probably charges a high premium over the cost of the underlying metal, though.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    59. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dental plan...

      Lisa needs braces!

    60. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      No one said these people were smart.

    61. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Golddess · · Score: 1

      But whether you are in the middle of the woods, or right by some building, how do you then keep the fire from spreading? Perhaps there are some locations where this would work, but I'd rather deal with the inconvenience of losing the copper in my AC than losing my house.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    62. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Mildly radioactive, but still *highly* toxic. (and as others have said, far more valuable and rare.)

    63. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

      The deputies who investigated our big theft at a 50,000 watt AM a couple of years ago said the best way to catch them was to set a trap (but even then, they got discouraged because the thieves would spend a few months in jail, then be right back out to steal again).

      As mentioned, the problem is that they steal a few tens, or even a few hundreds of dollars worth of scrap, the problem is that the cost to repair that damage is often hundreds or thousands of times more than that. Wanton destruction of that scale is considered a felony in most states, punishable by several years in prison. If you've caught them once, chances are they are a repeat offender. Why are they getting out after just a few months?

    64. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cobalt-60 would be my choice...

    65. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plutonium is only mildly radioactive thanks to its long half life. Cesium-137 would be a far better deterrent.

      What about having a tube around the wire that is filled with white phosphorus? If they mess with the wire, they start on fire!

      How are the people who have legitimate reasons to handle these booby trapped cables supposed to work with them???

    66. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by pclminion · · Score: 1

      You guys... Why not go with a time tested method? Six foot high chain link, razor wire, and signs posted every 50 feet: "Do not enter: anti-personnel mines." Oh, and you actually put mines there.

    67. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure but its harder these days to get a job than to steal for a larger than average segment of the population.

    68. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by DedTV · · Score: 1

      They've already tried that. California already has very stringent regulations on scrap buying.

      From the CA Scrap Theft Compliance Guide
      Scrap dealers must maintain records of transactions for two years, which must be submitted to law enforcement in the city or county in which the transaction occurred.
      Scrap metal dealers are prohibited from providing payment by cash or check for purchases of more than $20 unless the check is mailed or the cash or check is provided no earlier than three days after the sale date. The payment delay is excused if a customer has been to the same yard at least five times per month for three months in a row.
      Additionally, the recycler must obtain a photograph or video of the seller, the seller's thumbprint, a copy of the seller's driver's license, a description of the seller's vehicle and the license plate number of the seller's vehicle.
      There is a 90-day tag-and-hold policy when notified by law enforcement.

      There's almost as much paperwork involved in selling a couple garbage bags full of beer cans as it is to buy a gun. And scrap yards also have numerous regulations on their metal accounting and many counties have created agencies to audit scrap buyers which makes it quite difficult to launder metal. Yet scrap theft is still a major problem in California.
      Regulations and bureaucracy aren't working. However copper clad cable isn't likely to do a whole to stop it. There's already tons of regular copper stand that it'd cost too much to replace and it won't stop the thieves stealing other sources of scrap like air conditioners.

    69. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Yeah. About that. Generally, crime pays less than minimum wage, and criminals are people who can't bring themselves to punch a clock. It's hunter/gatherer all over again. Wake up when you're sober, steal what you can, sell what you've got, buy and get over.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    70. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Hope there's a firebreak in the run, or else that's one hell of a price to pay to flashburn one moron.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    71. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Adding sulfur and barium nitrate lowers ignition temperature and produces a more vigorous reaction. The gas produced by the burning sulfur will also cause the molten metal to spray a considerable distance. Also, using copper oxide is preferable to iron oxide in an antipersonnel application due to its lower melting and boiling points, increasing burn speed and causing earlier ejection of metal droplets.

      In any event, I find this discussion disheartening; I don't believe violence is an acceptable solution to poverty and income disparity, even if that violence is deployed by the ignorant action of a would-be criminal.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    72. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      In any event, I find this discussion disheartening; I don't believe violence is an acceptable solution to poverty and income disparity, even if that violence is deployed by the ignorant action of a would-be criminal.

      So you're saying only poor people commit crimes?

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    73. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by cffrost · · Score: 1

      So you're saying only poor people commit crimes?

      I'm inclined to believe only poor people would compelled to engage in something as laborious, high-risk and low-return as cable theft.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    74. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former cable- and busbar-theft professional, I disagree with you. I was bringing in about $40/hour* doing that back in 2001-2002, and I was making $30K/year in my day job, pretty good for a single, early-20s male with no dependents and little college. Of course, back then, it wasn't nearly so high-risk, but then again, copper was scrapping for 1/4 the price it is now.

      For the record, we only did buildings that were in the process of being demolished. Even when I was 20, I had morals. Actually, probably more then than I do now, since I'm now a jaded and cynical old bastard.

      *To be fair, this was just counting the time spent directly laboring, not scouting out sites and then searching the actual buildings. But as this was an offshoot of our urban exploration hobby, it's a bit disingenuous to count that time as labor (and just as disingenuous to not mention it at all).

    75. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      And maybe some alligators.

    76. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      You think criminals don't work hard? There's often a lot of work involved in some of the more complex stuff that's illegal. Think about things like bootlegging DVDs - you basically have to set up a miniature factory to get all this stuff out the gates.

      In this case, an unscrupulous scrap yard would probably have the equivalent of a "back room". Let this stuff go on at night, off hours, in a hidden place, etc. and keep the regular business going during the day. It can be one employees job to melt down the stolen stuff, and he'd get paid on the books for some other generic job. Make it look legit as possibly, hide everything you can, and most importantly deny, deny, deny.

      Crime only pays less than minimum wage if you are not ambitious or creative enough.

    77. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The best way to deter crime is to have a better social safety net in place and pull the economy out of the shitter.

      What are you? Some sort of filthy pinko commie faggot european terrorist? People like you should be taken to the nearest lynching tree, gut-shot by a militia of good citizens and hung up to die next to the TSA granny-groper to act as a warning to others.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    78. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you have a market to sell it in. Until you can transact a deal it has zero value and zero price.

    79. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are they getting out after just a few months?

      The prisons are full of minority drug offenders, just like the votes want.

    80. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

      Ayup. Doesn't matter if its worthless; it has to _appear_ worthless.

    81. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I actually often get that response, especially when it comes to socialized medicine. It gets a diminished a fair bit when I explain we already have a lot of socialized things in our country. You know, power companies, the police, fire departments... and fire departments are definitely a good one to use as well. I explain the disaster that was the fire companies in the private insurance era of the early 1900s. You know, they'd basically let your house burn and all? While that kinda stuff still (rarely) happens today, I think most people would generally agree that the current system is better.

    82. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      Well, as a fellow Illini (not so far from Springfield), I heard a semi-funny story about an apartment I used to live in. The upstairs neighbor came home from work and went to take a shower. She wasn't able to get any water, so she called the maintenance guys. They arrived to find the ground floor apartments (unoccupied) had been broken into and a large amount of the copper piping had been stolen.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    83. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Yes, let's set out to injure the poor and desperate instead of going after the real crooks - the scrap metal dealers who knowingly buy stolen property in large quantities and are the ones really getting rich. Seriously, close down that market and the thefts will drop off overnight.

      They are both equally culpable and equally deserving of punishment.

    84. Re:Just coat them with plutonium by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      An American who recognises sarcasm? It's definitely the Thought Police and the rubber hose interrogation for you!

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Something like 70% of copper thieves have been convicted of theft once before. If there was a death penalty for thieves - and really, why not for all felonies? - this problem would quickly end.

    But no, we have to worry about their feelings.

  3. Theif soultions by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Steal more copper cable. Less monetary damage in goods loss, more damage paying people to replace stolen cable.

    1. Re:Theif soultions by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

      actually i guess steel would make the cable much heavier and more of a bitch to work with right? So perhaps it could work. More than likely though they just find other sources of copper to steal from or just steal more of it in more sophisticated operations.

    2. Re:Theif soultions by trout007 · · Score: 2

      Copper is more dense than steel. I don't know if the equivalent capacity cable is lighter though.

      --
      I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
    3. Re:Theif soultions by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      I seriously doubt it; steel is a terrible conductor (compared to copper), so I'm guessing you'll need at least twice as much of it to get the same conductivity.

    4. Re:Theif soultions by publiclurker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think most of the lines in question are carrying AC current. this current tends to stay at the outer surface of the wire due to something called skin effect. I'm sure the steel is just there to give the wire diameter and strength.

    5. Re:Theif soultions by JonWan · · Score: 1

      AC and RF only run in the outside layer of a conductor. It's called the skin effect, if the copper clad is thick enough the conductivity will be the same as a solid wire as long as you don't run DC through it you will be OK.

    6. Re:Theif soultions by Joce640k · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More than likely though they just find other sources of copper to steal from or just steal more of it in more sophisticated operations.

      You overestimate the intelligence of thieves. The word is out that cable is valuable so the average thief will carry right on stealing it.

      The fact that he doesn't get paid much just means he won't take the day off to spend money. He'll be out stealing cable next day instead. Net result: even more cable being stolen than before.

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:Theif soultions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The skin effect is negligable at 60Hz.

    8. Re:Theif soultions by Fjandr · · Score: 2

      Steel is far harder to cut than copper though.

    9. Re:Theif soultions by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      I really hope there's a *woosh* in there.

    10. Re:Theif soultions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The poster maybe right about immediate effects. If something changed in my source of income, I'd look for another place. In a way they will accelerate the adoption of the new cables by clearing up the old ones.

      Backing themselves into an evolutionary corner.

    11. Re:Theif soultions by ChrisMaple · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nominal skin depth in copper at 60 Hz is about 9 mm. It takes a lot of current to require wires with a radius greater than 9mm.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    12. Re:Theif soultions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      unfortunately not. the classic example for tragedy of the commons meets finite resource is the economics of the fishing industry.

      catch rates remain stable in time right up until the point the population completely collapses. the increased effort to collect the same tonnage is balanced by better sonar and trawling technology which allows you place your nets exactly where the fish are so that you can collect every last one. (until the point the population completely collapses and you have to target another species)

      fun differential equations to play with as long as you can put it out of your mind that it's real, a good portion of the world's protein source relies on it, and once it is gone all those people will have to go somewhere else for their meat. (may be a good time to get into the squirrel farming business)

    13. Re:Theif soultions by mpe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You overestimate the intelligence of thieves. The word is out that cable is valuable so the average thief will carry right on stealing it.

      Also by the time the thief discovers the cable isn't valuable the damage has already been done. As happens with telephone cables. Since the typical thief can't tell the difference between copper and fibre cable before cutting it.

    14. Re:Theif soultions by mpe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nominal skin depth in copper at 60 Hz is about 9 mm. It takes a lot of current to require wires with a radius greater than 9mm.

      Which would be indistinguishable from solid copper until cut to a depth of more than 9mm and still contains a substantial quanity of copper.

    15. Re:Theif soultions by SuperQ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wrong, skin effect is related to frequency. There is almost no skin effect at 60hz, or even that much effect on audible frequencies in the 20khz range.

    16. Re:Theif soultions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm suspicious of copper clad steel solution. Copper is costly and has been for a while. If cladding steel with copper saved enough copper to discourage thieves then it would also be vastly less expensive. If so, why hadn't this been done purely for cost reasons?

    17. Re:Theif soultions by artor3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      As someone else has pointed out, this is factually incorrect. The skin depth in copper at 60 Hz (377 rad/s) is over 8 mm. The skin effect won't make a difference here.

    18. Re:Theif soultions by neyla · · Score: 1

      The skin-effect is not really relevant at 50Hz. You'd need to up the frequency by MANY magnitudes before that'd become dominant.

    19. Re:Theif soultions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Steel strikes at the root of the problem by making the cable less susceptible to theft by both increasing the resistance to cutting and drastically decreasing the scrap value.

      "This armour protects the wearer by making him invisible, we have also added a thin sheet of paper to make it harder to penetrate."

      One of the things actually matters, the other thing is added to give a better flow to the market-speak. (Yes, I know, you can do a lot of neat stuff with paper but you get the idea.)

    20. Re:Theif soultions by lordholm · · Score: 2

      IIRC, the register estimated that BT owned copper cables worth more than the company itself (current day's copper prices). Obviously, would all that copper come out on the market, copper prices would fall down to essentially nothing.

      If telcos start digging up their copper cables, replacing it with the steel cables with less copper contents. The telcos need to sell their excess copper; and so the copper price will plummet, eliminating the need for digging out the cables...

      --
      "Civis Europaeus sum!"
    21. Re:Theif soultions by couchslug · · Score: 2

      At high enough frequencies you don't even need a center conductor. Make aircraft radar systems much lighter, among other things.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waveguide_(electromagnetism)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    22. Re:Theif soultions by Bert64 · · Score: 2

      Well, the Telcos should really be replacing communication cable with fibre anyway...
      But telco cables aren't a great target for copper thieves because they are so thin.

      It's power cables that are the problem, you can't replace them with fibre and they need to be much thicker.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    23. Re:Theif soultions by couchslug · · Score: 1

      SIGNAGE in English and Spanish would help, as would rolling "not copper core, no scrap value" on the insulation when applying the other markings.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    24. Re:Theif soultions by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except for the big white letters embossed into the jacket that say "FIBER OPTIC"

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    25. Re:Theif soultions by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Copper in the ground spread over thousands of miles of cable runs is a lot less valuable than a big blob of copper, so the cost of recovering it all would be quite high. There's no way they could dump it all on the market, but I wouldn't be surprised if they pull segments of it up when they're installing fibre.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    26. Re:Theif soultions by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most power cables are NOT copper. Even the low power 220V ones coming to my house are only copper clad aluminum. they connect to a copper whip that goes from my meter to the masthead where the cable from the street goes.

      From wikipedia and personal experience.....

      "Aluminum conductors reinforced with steel (known as ACSR) are primarily used for medium and high voltage lines and may also be used for overhead services to individual customers. Aluminum cable is used because it has about half the weight of a comparable resistance copper cable (though larger diameter due to lower fundamental conductivity), as well as being cheaper.[1] Some copper cable is still used, especially at lower voltages and for grounding."

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    27. Re:Theif soultions by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      Or just steal more of the cable. I mean I freaking live in a state where two men stole a BRIDGE for scrap: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15344442

      It'll deter many, but solve the problem. The "professionals" going so far to steal manhole covers will likely just change tactics. Instead of selling it for scrap they'll be selling it as black market "less likely to be stolen cable" in Mexico. The amateurs will see copper and then complain about the salvage yard jipping them on money.

      This is a threat to national infrastructure, to a degree. Rural area, 13% poverty rate, the power companies and rail yard get hit near constantly.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    28. Re:Theif soultions by Nimey · · Score: 1

      What makes you think a meth-head copper thief is 1) literate when he's desperate for junk, and 2) going to be able to read in the night while he's digging up the line?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    29. Re:Theif soultions by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      Skin effect at 50Hz in Copper is the order of a few cm. More than enough to matter when moving megawatts of power.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    30. Re:Theif soultions by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Power cables are much larger than 8mm. Power cables at 50Hz are designed with the skin effect in mind.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    31. Re:Theif soultions by FirstNoel · · Score: 2

      That won't stop them...at least not at first.

      It's just the "Man" trying to mislead them from an easy score.

      --
      "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    32. Re:Theif soultions by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the register estimated that BT owned copper cables worth more than the company itself (current day's copper prices). Obviously, would all that copper come out on the market, copper prices would fall down to essentially nothing.

      If telcos start digging up their copper cables, replacing it with the steel cables with less copper contents. The telcos need to sell their excess copper; and so the copper price will plummet, eliminating the need for digging out the cables...

      Yeah the same was said about Bell in the early days. However I highly doubt that (BT's copper + cost of digging them up) > (BT's net worth)
      Hell probably (BT's copper) (cost of digging it up)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    33. Re:Theif soultions by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Missed a < on the last line. Guess I should have looked at the preview.
      (BT's copper) < (cost of digging it up)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    34. Re:Theif soultions by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      They steal bus shelters in London. Very simple method too: They just wear the uniforms for the bus company, drive a trick up and disassemble the shelter. With the right logo sewn to their jacket, few would question their authority.

    35. Re:Theif soultions by richardoz · · Score: 1

      The Skin Effect at 50 or 60 cycles is negligable. http://daycounter.com/Calculators/SkinEffect/Skin-Effect-Calculator.phtml

      --
      All the worlds indeed a .sig, and we are mearly players..
    36. Re:Theif soultions by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      IIRC back a few years the local phone company said that the money they made on the copper paid for removing the old copper cables and installing fiber.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    37. Re:Theif soultions by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

      Skin effect is frequency-dependent, and at at 50/60 Hz is pretty thick; in copper at those frequencies it's 8.5 millimeters, so you're definitely carrying current in the steel core, not just in the cladding.

    38. Re:Theif soultions by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      They didn't break into that facility to read, they broke in to thieve.

    39. Re:Theif soultions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cable in this article is merely copper plated steel. It would be very poor for AC current (and DC), as the thickness of the copper is negligible (other than for the purposes of corrosion protection).

      The role of this cable is for "surge protection" in communications facilities. In this case, the conductor is needed to divert voltage surges (e.g. lightning) to ground, so that the current avoids sensitive equipment. Lightning strikes are very brief, and these rapid transients exhibit RF behavior (hundreds of kHz). At such RF frequencies, "skin effect" is very marked, and the "skin depth" is only a few microns. With this cable, it matters not that only the plating is copper, as the current from a lightning strike would be confined only to the outer few microns.

      Copper plated steel for surge protection is not new. Grounding rods are usually made of copper plated steel - the reason, is that the steel provides structural strength so that they can be hammered into the ground, the copper provides low-resistance for surge current and protects against corrosion.

    40. Re:Theif soultions by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      But even if thieves steal the less-valuable wire, it will also be less expensive to replace. It's not only useful as a "deterrent."

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    41. Re:Theif soultions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite the big white letters saying "FIBER OPTIC CABLE" our company had an $11,000 reel of optical cable get stolen from a worksite. Unless it was another telecom (doubtful) this cable would be totally useless to anyone since there was not even any metal whatsoever (iron, aluminum, copper). If these dummies tried burning the cable to remove the insulation, all they would have been left with was a puddle of melted glass no prettier than campfire melted beer-bottles...

      Thieves suck... Hope they get electrocuted next time.

    42. Re:Theif soultions by sco08y · · Score: 1

      More than likely though they just find other sources of copper to steal from or just steal more of it in more sophisticated operations.

      You overestimate the intelligence of thieves. The word is out that cable is valuable so the average thief will carry right on stealing it.

      The fact that he doesn't get paid much just means he won't take the day off to spend money. He'll be out stealing cable next day instead. Net result: even more cable being stolen than before.

      People don't have to be smart to respond to price signals. There are other things to steal, thus an opportunity cost. If you dramatically decrease the value of stealing something, while the risk and effort to obtain that value remain the same, people are going to steal less of it.

    43. Re:Theif soultions by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Comparing the fishing industry to unorganized crime doesn't really work in regard to this particular issue though. You have an organized commercial interest that invests in the development of new techniques and technologies in order to overcome the hurdles of declining populations vs thieves who have to put a much greater amount of actual physical effort into severing large cables. These aren't people who, in general, will be investing in better techniques and technologies to sever tougher cables. Those cables they do steal will be of much lower value as well, unlike the commercial catch it's being compared to.

      Yes, there will be idiots who sit there for an hour trying to hack through a steel cable. They're unlikely to try again except to test whether their new target is bonded steel or actual copper.

      I wasn't saying there wouldn't be attempts on the newer cable, but the idea that the same thieves would continue making a concerted effort to steal the newer cables vs simply damaging them from "test-and-move-on" is laughable.

      More cables may be damaged, but it won't increase the amount of cables actually stolen, which was what Joce (I was hoping jokingly) claimed. Thieves (successful ones, anyway) rely on timing much more than effort. Something that dramatically increases the time required to steal cables is going to immediately reduce the number stolen.

    44. Re:Theif soultions by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      I understand the concept behind your statement, but not how it applies at all to what you quoted. Both the things in the quote will help reduce the theft rate, though technically not the susceptibility to theft. The cutting resistance reduces susceptibility and the latter reduces the likelihood the theft will be carried to completion once the would-be thief realizes what it's composed of. At the very least, it will reduce the likelihood of that same thief subsequently carrying a theft of steel cable once they have learned how cheap the scrap is from the first theft.

    45. Re:Theif soultions by cffrost · · Score: 1

      You overestimate the intelligence of thieves.

      There's little to be gained by underestimating the intelligence of an adversary.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    46. Re:Theif soultions by cffrost · · Score: 1

      What makes you think a meth-head copper thief is 1) literate when he's desperate for junk

      Amphetamine withdrawal doesn't cause illiteracy. Also, a meth-head is going to be desperate for meth, not heroin.

      2) going to be able to read in the night while he's digging up the line?

      Radium paint?

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    47. Re:Theif soultions by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      I'll admit being puzzled by this. The wires on the pole outside my house are 6 strands of aluminum around a steel core. I don't think I have ever seen copper distribution lines.

      At one point as a kid, I looked into salvaging a mile of power line that went to an abandoned mine. It too was Al over steel. We talked to various scrap dealers. They weren't interested unless we separated the aluminum from the steel. We tried that with a 20 foot chunk and decided to cut firewood instead.

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
    48. Re:Theif soultions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skin effect is important at high frequencies (lots of kHz).

      At 60Hz for cables less than a few inches in diameter, it's a non-issue.

      -michael

    49. Re:Theif soultions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big as in "less than a millimeter tall". Yeah, nobody an miss that.

    50. Re:Theif soultions by JDBalogh · · Score: 1
      Note that the skin effect: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skin_effect/ is highly dependent on AC frequency.
      So for a power wire example (the CommScope copper grounding wire replacement example) at 50Hz or 60Hz, the skin depth is on the order of 10mm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Skin_depth_by_Zureks.png/
      In other words, until the cable diameter is over 20mm, the skin depth is the whole wire; 10mm radius in from each side => 20mm diameter.

      For the case in point (thin copper over steel core) the photos from CommScope show multi-wire (stranded) conductors with each strand being composed of a steel core with a thin layer of copper. Even if each strand was 3 mm and the copper was insignificant in cross-section, the skin depth of steel (from the chart above) is still deeper than the wire is thick. The cable does not act like a single solid (steel) wire until it is tightly twisted - crushed really - to eliminate the air gaps between strands.

  4. This won't work by mattventura · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It might stop them from being able to get money from the cable, but it's not like it's going to deter them from stealing the cable in the first place under the assumption that the cable is copper.

    1. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All they have to do is include a few thousands signs with each order that says "This cable is GroundSmart Copper Clad Steel Cable and is worthless to scrap yards"... sure, some would ignore the sign, but after a few batches would fail to get sold for much, the signs suddenly become an even better deterant than the actual cable.

    2. Re:This won't work by Mashiki · · Score: 5, Informative

      Too true. They'll still try to cut and strip cable, if they think it's valuable. There's been a lot of cases not only in the US but in Canada where these jackasses have cut fibre links thinking they were copper.

      While copper coated steel is a good idea, steel still has a market value. So these guys will simply strip the copper off, either by shaving or electrolysis. And then sell both. After all they wouldn't steal manhole covers if steel(and iron) had no value either. Really though, as long as scrap dealers are willing to look the other way for where metal is coming from it'll be easy.

      Though you can bet that once the job market picks up, this type of stuff will become rare again.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will work, it just won't be precipitous. When you commit a crime in order to profit and you don't actually profit, you won't continue to commit it with at least some forethought (ie, determining if the cables you are stealing are actually valuable). Additionally, these cables will be cheaper for initial installations (a nice side benefit) and if they are stolen, at least the expense of replacing the raw material will be somewhat mitigated.

    4. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i work in a mexican telecom dept. and they steal diesel, f.o cables, grounding bars and A.C like there's no tomorrow

    5. Re:This won't work by afabbro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You assume the thieves can read, are operating in a clear state of mind, and/or are operating in a lighted area.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    6. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm from a third world country and I can tell you that we haven't seen copper power lines in decades. They're all made of some form of aluminium-steel combination for precisely the same reason the article is talking about. Thieves leave them alone.

    7. Re:This won't work by mysidia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really though, as long as scrap dealers are willing to look the other way for where metal is coming from it'll be easy.

      I'm all for the government increasing regulatory burdens for scrap dealers and coming down on any scrap dealers caught "looking the other way", by throwing the scrap dealer in jail if necessary

    8. Re:This won't work by evilviper · · Score: 1

      it's not like it's going to deter them from stealing the cable in the first place under the assumption that the cable is copper.

      Sounds like a good plan. Theives do all the work, then find their payday going down the drain. If they can't tell the difference, a relatively small percentage of this stuff being installed discourages them from stealing the actual copper cables, too, since they can't tell if any target is going to pay-off or not.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    9. Re:This won't work by Cylix · · Score: 2

      I don't think they are going to actually strip it.

      These guys basically destroyed tens of thousands worth of property to make twenty dollars at the scrap yard.

      On a bit of a karma note I once heard about a scrap yard theft. The guys would pull up next to the yard in a boat (it was next to the river) and haul in a bunch of copper. The next day or so they would come back to the scrap yard and sale the theft back to them.

      Unfortunately, that trick only works so many times.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    10. Re:This won't work by gman003 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a cost-benefit thing.

      Right now, stealing copper is easy, and gives a high benefit. Attempts to make it harder to steal have failed, as they profit outweighs the cost. This simultaneously makes it harder to steal (steel cable is harder to cut) and sell (the average *person* doesn't even know how to do electrolysis, let alone the average thief), while also decreasing the profit (copper is about 10x as expensive as steel by mass).

      This may also be worth it simply as cheaper cable - while I expect manufacturing costs are a bit higher, material costs would be far lower. If you can buy "theft-resistant" cable for half the price of pure-copper cable, why the hell wouldn't you?

    11. Re:This won't work by haruchai · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, we don't need more Big Government looking over the shoulders of our job creators. The market will take care of itself if left alone.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    12. Re:This won't work by c0lo · · Score: 1

      ...like there's no tomorrow

      They may be right.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    13. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is hard to read when you haven't had your meth in a few hours.

    14. Re:This won't work by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      the average *person* doesn't even know how to do electrolysis, let alone the average thief

      The average scrap-metal salvager does, and that's all that's important. Are you operating under the flawed assumption that scrap-metal dealers will turn away obvious thieves? That's most of their business.

      while also decreasing the profit (copper is about 10x as expensive as steel by mass).

      Yes, so the thieves will steal more of it, or switch to something else. They're already stealing manhole covers (causing auto crashes), and those are made of cheap-ass cast iron.

      The only way to stop this is through stronger laws and law enforcement targeting the scrap-metal dealers. We were having a bunch of problems with this crap here in Phoenix a few years ago. The State passed new laws requiring the scrap-metal dealers to look at IDs and take down names and addresses for all sales, and it's died down a lot.

    15. Re:This won't work by smpoole7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We have signs like that. Our signs also point out that stealing from a federally-licensed facility could result in a federal investigation. Shoot, the Birmingham Police have their antennas on one of our big FM towers, and the thieves DON'T CARE. They get hit all the time.

      The thieves will destroy the cable to determine if it's clad or pure copper, then throw aside the stuff they don't want. It still leaves *ME* with a ton of cleanup and repair to do.

      That's what I love about this crap: they steal $20 worth of copper and do $10,000 of damage in the process. They'll take the three ground cables from a 700' tower (worth about $10 for scrap) -- and those grounds are what keep lightning out of my equipment. A storm rolls along and I get hammered, while they sit back with their six pack of beer and think they've done well for themselves. (Whimper.)

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    16. Re:This won't work by hedwards · · Score: 1

      My parents have that shit in their house and quite frankly, it's not something you want unless you don't have other viable choices. It's unfortunate that so many people are in a position where they think stealing live wire is a good idea.

      Perhaps at some point we could start funding the educational system, welfare and crime prevention programs again. Throwing people in prison for longer and longer periods of time just doesn't seem to be working.

    17. Re:This won't work by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

      It may take a while, but eventually thieves making a business of this will see a vanishing return on stolen copper. A good "business man" in this case will move on to something else. Will it completely stop theft? No, but it is a start.

      --
      Chewbacon
      The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
    18. Re:This won't work by gzipped_tar · · Score: 3, Funny

      They must be very good at NetHack.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    19. Re:This won't work by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      It will if the cable is any sort of sizable conductor. Cutting through that much steel cable will prevent them from actually finishing the job without either a) being caught or b) giving up out of sheer frustration.

      It may not stop the initial damage caused by the attempt, but cutting anything of the size required for grid-scale power transmission is not going to work out well for the would-be thief.

    20. Re:This won't work by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Throwing people in prison for longer and longer periods of time just doesn't seem to be working.

      It's hard to steal power cables while you're in jail.

    21. Re:This won't work by errhuman · · Score: 1

      How exactly would the market correct this? I don't quite have the black-is-white-yes-is-no imagination for this one.

    22. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aluminium and steel are used in power lines for their mechanical properties (e.g. being light or high tensile strength, cheaper), not to deter thieves.

    23. Re:This won't work by smpoole7 · · Score: 1

      >> ...like there's no tomorrow

      > They may be right.

      *Golf clap*

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    24. Re:This won't work by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Though you can bet that once the job market picks up, this type of stuff will become rare again.

      Im not sure how employable someone is who is willing to steal copper cable for scrap. Is that someone YOU would want to hire?

    25. Re:This won't work by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 0

      Fuck, we just need to bring public caning back, or hack parts of limbs off. Those have to be for heinous things though like theft that causes damages of $5,000 or more (cane them for less). Take two fingers each time. Figure if someone can't figure out after five tries, they really don't enjoy having functional hands, and eating. Figure after the first time it'll just stop. People who steal stuff like copper won't be served by MORE education. They are out of the K-12 educational system by then, and generally methed outa their head.

    26. Re:This won't work by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

      Of course! Because meth Heads always read signs.

    27. Re:This won't work by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Receiving stolen goods is already illegal.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    28. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this state you have to have a valid Electrical Contractor's license and bond in order to sell scrap copper wire.

    29. Re:This won't work by Nadaka · · Score: 4, Informative

      People get real desperate when they have hungry kids. When I was a kid my father poached wild game. It was the only way we could afford meat. And my mother ground hogs feed to make bread, because we couldn't afford either bread or grain intended for human consumption. When you are in that kind of situation you do or you die. There is no other option.

    30. Re:This won't work by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Being cheaper and harder to cut also deters thieves.

    31. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The market for "scrap" copper is China, BTW.They've been pillaging off important alloys from North America for a few years. Got enough left to move the nation's electricity? How about in ten years?

    32. Re:This won't work by jamesh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fuck, we just need to bring public caning back, or hack parts of limbs off. Those have to be for heinous things though like theft that causes damages of $5,000 or more (cane them for less). Take two fingers each time. Figure if someone can't figure out after five tries, they really don't enjoy having functional hands, and eating. Figure after the first time it'll just stop. People who steal stuff like copper won't be served by MORE education. They are out of the K-12 educational system by then, and generally methed outa their head.

      Why wait for laws like this to be introduced? There are a countries that are decades ahead of the US with laws like that in place right now and if you speak to the governments there they say the laws are working wonderfully. You should move to one of those countries. Today.

    33. Re:This won't work by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well diesel/gas/white gas fuel theft isn't anything new, or grounding rods or ac thefts either. One thing I can suggest, is if you're using a fuel dump or several. Switch your tank an cap labels, and inform your drivers of it. Meaning gas = diesel, and diesel = gas, and "mislabeled" water tanks can sometimes be mixed in too. And do it randomly, so the thieves have no idea which is which. It worked for us at a remote site when we were doing trench dumps.

      We'd park our fuel buggies out in a field and leave them and people would 'help' themselves. It stopped right quick once we did that, and there was a line of cars down the road. I know plenty of farmers that do the same thing.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    34. Re:This won't work by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Starvation deaths in our country are ridiculously low, and even more so once you factor out those incapable of caring (much less working) for themselves, and those mentally unstable. In fact, I would hazard that outside of those, it is non-existent.

      Youre welcome to try to pull up stats that contradict me, but I just checked this like a month ago, and it was something like
      0.0-something % of deaths were "exposure", and most were incapable of self care.

    35. Re:This won't work by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another scrapyard karma story:

      Many, many years ago my mother worked at an iron foundry. One day she transferred a call from a scrap dealer to the president, and afterward he told her the story. The scrap dealer had called to ask if the foundry really had sent these guys to sell the pig ingots back that they had just shipped the previous afternoon, and the answer was of course "no." The dealer knew exactly who to call because several of the ingots still had his chalkmarks indicating which foundry he had sold them to!

      Seems these enterprising thieves broke into the back gate from the railroad tracks, saw a large number of shiny pig ingots stacked on the back dock, and thought they were valuable (probably not knowing that pig iron was going for about $20/ton.) They must have sweated all night carrying these forty pound pigs a block and a half down the railroad tracks, then up a railroad bridge embankment, to their waiting truck. The scrap dealer also told the president that these guys had broken the springs on their truck by overloading it. Since he was keeping the thieves busy outside by having them unload the ingots from their busted truck, he asked the foundry president if he should call the police for him. The president was laughing by this time and said as long as he got his iron back, they'd been punished enough. "Hell, if they hadn't stolen from us, I'd hire them! Nobody around here works that hard!"

      --
      John
    36. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we don't need more Big Government looking over the shoulders of our job creators. The market will take care of itself if left alone.

      Somebody has been getting their thoughts implanted by Fox News. I can tell by how you mistakenly mix the term "Big Government" with "regulation" when the two are complete polar opposites. The Dems are in favor of Big Government, the GOP in favor of Regulation. Get your rhetoric straight.

      And no matter what you've been told, the super-rich and large corporations are not "job creators". Most jobs are created by middle-class people who run small businesses.

      This is something which does need legal attention. Letting the "market take care of itself" is a bullshit answer, as the only way "the market" has to solve this is to hire armed guards and shoot thieves. You have to have a legal system which sets proper penalties for the crime, and funds enforcement, or there is no way for the "free market" to solve jack shit.

    37. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those caught stealing infrastructure cable should be changed with treason and shot in public without trial.
      Those who knowingly purchase stolen infrastructure cable should 'only' be charged with aiding in treason, so they should get an actual show trial before they eat a bullet.

    38. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, no regulation on the "job creating" scrap dealers, keep your grubby Big Government off them. It's not like they're enabling people by "looking the other way" when buying a piece of metal from someone that can't explain what/why they are selling it.

      What's next? Pawn Shops?

    39. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd be willing to gamble that the majority of people stealing metals to scrap are putting it more toward beer and drugs than "need it to take care of my family".

    40. Re:This won't work by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's what I love about this crap: they steal $20 worth of copper and do $10,000 of damage in the process.

      If this happens regularly wouldn't it be worth investing in some better security, or even a security guard? Doesn't your insurance company insist on it?

      From the stories people are posting here about thieves jumping over chain link fences I can't help but think some barbed wire and a high concrete wall might help. Or am I missing something?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's been a lot of cases not only in the US but in Canada where these jackasses have cut fibre links thinking they were copper.

      Add Britain to that list as well.
      (jackasses?, fsckwits more like.....)

    42. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your signs are different than what I suggest.

      There are signs that say that robbery is illegal, not to drink and drive, no parking here, etc... in all cases the violater weighs the risk vs the reward... and in the case of your facility obviously thinks it's worth the risk as they sure seem to get away with it a lot.

      If... you could (legally) put a sniper on the roof who would gun down anyone going near said cables without permission... and post a sign to that effect... I'd wager the theifs would find a different target... just as if it was clear that what they are targeting isn't where you are, they would move on.

      Personally... I am in favor of the sniper option as it sends a clear message that looters will be shot (oh the good old days when it was more common place).

    43. Re:This won't work by mpe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All they have to do is include a few thousands signs with each order that says "This cable is GroundSmart Copper Clad Steel Cable and is worthless to scrap yards"

      You have to ensure that the signs are in all appropriate languages and that they themselves have no scrap value.

    44. Re:This won't work by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      I think GPP was a Poe. Though by it's nature, it is hard to be sure.

    45. Re:This won't work by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Most are probably repeat thieves. After getting burned with steel a couple of times, they'll pay more attention to notices.

    46. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Throwing people in prison for longer and longer periods of time just doesn't seem to be working.

      It's hard to steal power cables while you're in jail.

      Its generally more cost effective to teach them why its bad idea to steal stuff rather than lock em up for life.

    47. Re:This won't work by ae1294 · · Score: 2

      Personally... I am in favor of the sniper option as it sends a clear message that looters will be shot (oh the good old days when it was more common place).

      wow I've seen those sniper on duty signs before and thought they where jokes... I best be more careful..

    48. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of karma...a friend of mine caught the guys in this story: http://articles.latimes.com/2007/aug/31/local/me-ocbriefs31.s2. He was our maintenance guy, fixing a problem at night in our building on the other end of the same parking lot. He went over because he heard the screams (through several thick concrete walls) and wound up calling the cops. He also...uh...convinced the other suspect to stick around and wait for the cops to arrest him. The one guy that got shocked wound up dying in the hospital the next day.

    49. Re:This won't work by kyrio · · Score: 2

      Are you really dumb enough to think that a person who works that hard for the $10 worth of scrap is using it for food for family? Someone that hard working would get a job easily. The people doing this are not able to get jobs because of their drug addictions. They do not have families.

    50. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you operating under the flawed assumption that scrap-metal dealers will turn away obvious thieves? That's most of their business.

      [citation needed]

    51. Re:This won't work by Hognoxious · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Starvation deaths in our country are ridiculously low

      LordLimecat, meet Rest Of The World...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    52. Re:This won't work by cp.tar · · Score: 2

      You may also include the signs regardless of whether the cable is really copper-clad steel.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    53. Re:This won't work by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      *whooosh*

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    54. Re:This won't work by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      No, we don't need more Big Government looking over the shoulders of our job creators. The market will take care of itself if left alone.

      You are moderated funny but the article is an example of that exact thing happening.

    55. Re:This won't work by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's hard to steal power cables from British railway lines while you're in .

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    56. Re:This won't work by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Fresno, california is in the US, last I checked.

    57. Re:This won't work by RoLi · · Score: 1

      That won't stop the state-worshippers from screaming for more laws.

    58. Re:This won't work by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      but after a few batches would fail to get sold for much, the signs suddenly become an even better deterant than the actual cable.

      ... at which point facilities owners will start posting these signs even when they are actually using normal cables, and eventually thieves realize that most of these signs are just blufff...

    59. Re:This won't work by shentino · · Score: 2

      Moral suasion doesn't work against someone who doesn't give a flying rat's behind about anyone but themselves.

      The fact that they're causing a few orders of magnitude more damage than the copper they're stealing is worth proves how much they care.

    60. Re:This won't work by RoLi · · Score: 1

      Throwing people in prison for longer and longer periods of time just doesn't seem to be working.

      Longer prison terms is the main reason why crime has decreased since the 80's peak.

    61. Re:This won't work by RoLi · · Score: 1

      Its generally more cost effective to teach them why its bad idea to steal stuff rather than lock em up for life.

      [citation needed]

    62. Re:This won't work by hedwards · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's a nice story except it's not true. If that were the case then how do you explain the fact that crime is still dropping despite cutting back on stiff sentences and releasing criminals for budgetary reasons?

      http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/01/07/us-usa-crime-idUSTRE60613K20100107

    63. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First they came for the copper thieves. And no one cared. Then they came for the movie and music thieves. And no one cares. Then they came for you. And there was nobody left to care.

    64. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "From the stories people are posting here about thieves jumping over chain link fences I can't help but think some barbed wire and a high concrete wall might help. Or am I missing something?"

      Yes you are... Copper thieves are scum bags. The real solution is to give them copper in the form of a FMJ bullet to the head.

      These folks are worse than animals and should be treated as such.

    65. Re:This won't work by oobayly · · Score: 1

      I heard a story that where there was a sign saying "These cables are fibre optic, and have zero scrap value", somebody dug them up, and then wrote on the sign "Yeah, but we had to check anyway".

    66. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Barbed wire and concrete aren't that hard to circumvent (large piece of thick cloth and rope+hook respectively), so that wouldn't work much and add a lot of cost.

      Also remember: most of this happens with very long cables or remote locations where the police is more than 15 min. away. 24hr guard costs a lot and they can only protect a small area.

    67. Re:This won't work by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      It would be cheaper to just put the notices up and not bother replacing the cables, so sooner or later the notices will become inaccurate and worthless anyway.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    68. Re:This won't work by julesh · · Score: 3, Funny

      I had a can labelled "unleaded petrol" stolen out of my shed a few weeks ago. It was full of diesel. I really, really hope somebody tried to use it as petrol without checking. :)

    69. Re:This won't work by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Have you forgotten that in many places a single pot bust when you were 19 pretty much condemns you to the lowest manual labor which is now done by Jose for $4 an hour? I've known guys that have become drug dealers simply because there wasn't a single legal honest job they could get, any employer would run a background check and that was it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    70. Re:This won't work by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google the Bastoy prison in Norway. It looks like a damn summer camp, where the inmates can go swimming, cook their own food (they're given knives!), watch TV. Hell, their "cells" look more spacious than my old dorm room.

      Criminals sent there have some of the lowest recidivism rates in the entire world. It works because the Norwegians believe in rehabilitation instead of retribution.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    71. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Type of thing ticks me off when people are too stupid to make use of government programs that I pay for at gunpoint and instead break the law. They used to show a PSA with a single mom stealing ketchup packets to make soup for her kids. Hello, you're a poor woman with kids, bingo the doors of government open for you. Hell they even made a song about it.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzspsovNvII

    72. Re:This won't work by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      It's illegal, but it's very difficult to prove and therefore to prosecute. This means that most scrap dealers are confident that they can get away with it. Requiring them to keep copies of ID for anyone that sells them copper wire and be able to prove where all of the wire that they bought comes from, performing random spot checks on scrap dealers after copper thefts, and getting some high-profile prosecutions would go a long way. I doubt scrap dealers will pay more than 10% of the market value for stolen copper anyway. Get this down to 1%, and not even meth addicts will bother stealing it...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    73. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These guys basically destroyed tens of thousands worth of property to make twenty dollars

      Is that copper thieves your talking about, or banks?

    74. Re:This won't work by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How about FIX the problem by requiring all scrap yards to hold scrap cable for 7 days before payout and require a real drivers license or ID. the scrapyard then posts the cable turned in to a police website so the cops can cross reference a theft with a scrap drop off, and then wait for t he guy to show up to collect his payout.

      but no, we cant do that. Just like how we cant require this to happen at pawn shops.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    75. Re:This won't work by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      The CEO of enron got a job at another company, so I'm guessing that hiring thieves is not a problem with most places.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    76. Re:This won't work by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      In addition, most studies on how policing can deter crime have noticed that your chance of getting caught has a much greater deterrent effect that how long your sentence is. Basically, if you have a 95% chance of getting away with it, then crime tends to pay, so people commit crimes. Whereas if you have a 40% chance of getting away with it, crime doesn't pay.

      What that means in practical terms is:
      1. More police officers, enough to investigate all felonies and many misdemeanors as well.
      2. Police officers who are representative of and part of the communities they police, so citizens are more comfortable with the police.
      3. Police officers having more limited police powers, and not abusing those powers, so citizens who aren't committing crimes are willing to talk to them about people who are committing crimes.

      So if you want to police the ghetto, your goal is to find the most upstanding citizens from the ghetto you can find (which do exist - just because someone was born and raised in a ghetto doesn't mean they're a criminal), and train them to be friendly to the people they've known their whole lives unless they've committed a crime. It's not perfect, but it's a lot better than the current plan of trying to intimidate people into cooperating.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    77. Re:This won't work by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      AIUI at least in the UK to prosecute someone for receiving stolen goods requires showing that they "knew or should have known" they were stolen. That can be quite a hard thing to prove. A truckload of copper wire from a theft isn't going to look much different from a truckload of copper wire stripped out in a legitimate building project.

      OTOH a specific law can require scrapyard owners to put in place policies that discourage theives. One such policy could be to require ID to be shown and recorded with each sale. Another would be requiring a minimum hold time before scrap is processed (crushed, melted etc).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    78. Re:This won't work by delinear · · Score: 2

      More likely if it did start to work is that people would just throw up the signs everywhere as a deterrent and thieves would eventually realise there was real copper being "protected" by fake signs. Then we'd be back to step one except the thieves would be earning less per average haul and would need to steal more cable to get back to their previous levels. Better to tackle the issue of those who are buying this stolen cable than play whack a mole with those who are stealing it.

    79. Re:This won't work by vlm · · Score: 1

      How exactly would the market correct this? I don't quite have the black-is-white-yes-is-no imagination for this one.

      The scrap dealers will earn money and donate it to the lawmakers re-election campaign, obviously. Everyone important wins!

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    80. Re:This won't work by delinear · · Score: 1

      You'd just get people mugging the snipers on their way to/from their sniper nest. A black market sniper rifle has got to be worth way more than an armful of copper cable.

    81. Re:This won't work by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      IIRC newer aluminium alloys are better than older ones but it still isn't something you really want in an installation that isn't under tight control. Building wiring is rarely under tight control (whatever the powers that be might like to believe).

      Power companies on the other hand can use it successfully because they can keep tight control over what parts and procedures are used for jointing it. Plus power company wiring is usually outdoors so a bad joint overheating isn't so serious as it would be inside the walls of your house.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    82. Re:This won't work by vlm · · Score: 1

      ... since they can't tell if any target is going to pay-off or not....

      Sure they can tell. A nasty side effect is criminalization of magnets, private ownership of a magnet while on public property means felony possession of burglary tools or whatever, but its quite possible... Tell a meth head they're only getting 50 cents for meth instead of 50 bucks for meth a couple times, they'll figure out that using a magnet might be a good idea.

      This product is extremely large copperweld antenna wire, which has been around a lot longer than I have been around. I should try a piece at home and see if its magnetic. I would expect it is. If so, I would expect large power cables to be magnetic.

      On thing no one has discussed (as far as I've seen so far) is copperweld used to be famous for corroding and having the copper flake off then rusting and snapping thru. Plated "anything" doesn't last forever outdoors. Instead of putting up copper for 50 years, and randomly replacing it every 10 years as its stolen, you'll be putting up new copperweld every 5 years or so. Labor costs will be "interesting".

      Another thing no one has discussed is the whole point of using copperweld antenna wire is you can space your supports much further apart. So at least in the long run, theoretically, you could get rid of half your "telephone poles". Also this is because you can place steel cored copperweld under much higher tension, so when lines do snap instead of just taking off someones head, the whiplash will probably slice cars in two, carve furrows into blacktop, etc. I'm not sure the linemen are going to be all that enthusiastic about this product.

      Finally, the most effective solution to casual copper theft I've ever seen is called burial. Not killing and burying the thieves, although that would work, but burying the cable. I've never heard in 20 years of an outage being caused by buried cable being dug up by thieves. It's always aerial fiber being mistaken for power line, or POP lost power because thieves cut the lines, etc. Our POPs in built up urban areas with underground power distribution (skyscrapers, etc) never seem to have their copper stolen, its always sites with aerial feeds.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    83. Re:This won't work by Thing+1 · · Score: 2

      The only way to stop this is through stronger laws and law enforcement targeting the scrap-metal dealers.

      While I agree with this sentiment at the level of the problem that this article states, I'd like to add that it is sad that few of us realize the reality of the situation. Bankers have corrupted our system, leaving it in such a state that citizens need to steal parts of our infrastructure (causing orders of magnitude more damage than they benefit financially) in order to survive.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    84. Re:This won't work by vlm · · Score: 1

      It may not stop the initial damage caused by the attempt, but cutting anything of the size required for grid-scale power transmission is not going to work out well for the would-be thief.

      Sure about that? I've done a fair amount of metalwork, and frankly anything less than an inch around cuts almost as fast under a cutting torch as it does in a shear, almost. Hand held abrasive saws go pretty quick, although they're loud.

      I've done some metalworking with copper and its ductility and gumminess makes it pretty hard to work. Shears work up to a certain small diameter. Then its agony with the cold saw, or a gummed up hacksaw... I suppose a thief with a lot of spare time could use an axe? I'm curious how electricians cut large diameter copper wire. In the machine shop we clamp blocks of copper down to the milling machine table, try all kinds of cutting fluids none of which help (supposedly milk works but when it sours the stench must be amazing) and we swear a lot, which other than the swearing isn't going to be possible for an electrician in the field.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    85. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps at some point we could start funding the educational system

      Someone has been lying to you. The US education system is one of the best funded education systems in the world. Funding is absolutely not an issue in any way. The real problem is funding management and priorities. If you've seen teachers let go its not because of a lack of funding, but rather incompetent management of available funds.

    86. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the scrapyards won't actually do it. Turn it around: offer a bounty to scrap dealers for assistance in catching any copper thieves. Make the bounty two times what the scrap value of the copper was.

    87. Re:This won't work by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Have you forgotten that in many places a single pot bust when you were 19 pretty much condemns you to the lowest manual labor which is now done by Jose for $4 an hour?

      Have you forgotten that this is a global problem effecting pretty much every society on the planet?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    88. Re:This won't work by swalve · · Score: 1

      Based on what I see, your standard copper thief is pretty smart. (Or at least as smart as the scrapyards force them to be.) There is a guy in the neighborhood who scraps metal as a side gig. He is pretty smart about what kind of metal is which. I've brought stuff to the scrapper before (lead-acid batteries were 11 cents a pound last time), and those guys police what you bring in pretty heavily. If you don't strip ALL the steel off of aluminum, for example, you get the steel price. I would not be surprised if the folks doing the stealing figured it out pretty quickly. My impression is that your metal thief is a little smarter than your standard mugger or guy stealing batteries from Walgreens.

    89. Re:This won't work by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      It may take a while, but eventually thieves making a business of this will see a vanishing return on stolen copper. A good "business man" in this case will move on to something else. Will it completely stop theft? No, but it is a start.

      The theft of copper wasnt a problem until copper started becoming valuable, so the world has infrastructure where copper literally sits undefended. People go on about feeding families or drug problems, but thats not the reason for these thefts at all.

      Mankind all over the planet requires obstacles (such as locks) to keep its people honest. Its human nature to scavenge valuable/useful things. A few years ago it was catalytic converters. 40 years ago it was hub caps.

      You are right that there will be vanishing returns. Thats how markets work... It would require government regulations to perpetuate the cycle.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    90. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Canada also has nice prisons where the goal is rehabilitation instead of retribution. Their recidivism rate is also very, very low in contrast with US prisons.

    91. Re:This won't work by smpoole7 · · Score: 2

      > At a certain point having a "welfare state" might become cheaper overall.

      We have cameras. We have alarms. The guy who jumped the fence in this case was aware of both. He wore a mask because of the camera, and like I said, he knew the response time and was in and out before the cops could get there.

      The most cost-effective solution is to have the site monitored by cameras 24/7. But then you still have the problem of police response time.

      Having a guard on site? That would work, but it's very expensive. For a marginal operation, it could literally drive them out of business.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    92. Re:This won't work by smpoole7 · · Score: 1

      Around here, very few of the known thieves are meth heads. That's a stereotype.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    93. Re:This won't work by ommerson · · Score: 2

      The proposals for the UK go further: registration of scrap metal dealers and banning of cash payments for scrap, thereby also eliminating huge amounts of tax fraud.

      A rather unsavoury fact is that a lot metal theft is perpetrated by employees taking surplus or redundant materials from the employer.

    94. Re:This won't work by Nimey · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Oh, hey, an internet libertarian who accuses people who disagree with him of worshiping the state. Never seen /that/ before.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    95. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you copy this verbatim from the your Good Republican handbook?

    96. Re:This won't work by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      You think so do you. This what I would do if I were a crooked scarp dealer.

      I'd take the names and IDs of my legitimate dealers, just as the law requires. I would then simply over state the amount of recoverable material in my 'official' books after processing. I would continue to buy from the meth-head thieves, paying them a lower rate. The overstated recovery on my books conceals the other inventory I am getting under the table. Unless someone takes a very careful audit of my operation or I get really greedy and careless that would very hard to detect; you won't find it with statistics either because all the other scappers will be doing the same thing.

      You can't regulate crime like this out of existence. You might be able to curb it somewhat but you will impose costs on the public that more than likely exceed the those of the crime you do prevent.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    97. Re:This won't work by swalve · · Score: 1

      How have the bankers corrupted the system, in your opinion?

    98. Re:This won't work by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

      I thought it was birth control?

      --
      "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    99. Re:This won't work by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I don't that is a good idea. Might be ok for you to do personally at your residence (though still illegal) but if you doing it for a commercial enterprise I would think twice, or at least call the local fire Marshall first and ask what the rules are. I don't know what the federal rules might be but at least where I live there are local laws against storing accelerates and fuels in mislabeled containers.

      You can and will get ticketed if your are spotted say pumping K1 into a Gasoline can at the local filling station.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    100. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Around here it's not "hungry kids". It's not lack of a safety net. It's methheads stealing copper, or a certain group of people getting scrap from where ever they can to support their lifestyle. Which includes $30,000 BMW paid for with cash.
      And they are on welfare by, the way.
      Citation: work.

    101. Re:This won't work by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I'm convinced it's impossible to satirize libertarians because the threshold between "straight-faced serious" and "Poe's law," which is the butterzone for jokes, is completely nonexistant because the two zones overlap.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    102. Re:This won't work by sempir · · Score: 0

      It looks like a damn summer camp, where the inmates can go swimming, cook their own food (they're given knives!), watch TV.

      Do you have to be a native of Norway to get into the Bastoy? Just asking!!!!!

      --
      A closed mouth gathers no foot.
    103. Re:This won't work by camperdave · · Score: 1

      "Hey, Bubba! Lookee there. That sign says they's got copper cable."

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    104. Re:This won't work by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And then, when the police check with one of your regular legal suppliers and their records disagree with yours you find yourself on the receiving end of a surveillance operation. Then they catch you buying stolen cables and faking your records. Now you're in court for conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and for fraud, as well as for trafficking in stolen goods.

      Oh, and since you've knowingly falsified your paperwork, you've also lost the defence that you didn't know it was stolen...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    105. Re:This won't work by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      The other way around would be much better!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    106. Re:This won't work by kyrio · · Score: 1

      So, they became drug dealers, because that's the easiest (illegal) job they could do with extremely high returns. Wow, not being a drug addict certainly makes a difference in life choices!

    107. Re:This won't work by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The guy who jumped the fence in this case was aware of both.

      My post was about how you need a better fence that can't be jumped. Lots of places have them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    108. Re:This won't work by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I think so.

      Although it is a minimum-security prison, isn't it telling that Norway treats its prisoners better than the US treats its welfare recipients?

      And on the whole, people are happier in Norway. Imagine that :-)

      --
      Eat the rich.
    109. Re:This won't work by tibit · · Score: 1

      I agree. Copper really needs to be electrolytically machined for any sort of volume production I've been told. I've seen the process, and while it's "nasty", the results are accurate and repeatable, and there's no swearing involved as far as I could tell :)

      There's plenty of very expensive tools for dealing with electrical copper wire and terminals: hydraulic shears, crimpers, etc. Properly attaching terminals to a 1" diameter wire requires probably $25k worth of tools.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    110. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be a thief?

    111. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except in certain cases ;)

    112. Re:This won't work by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      I've also been on welfare and it did not feed a family of 5. Nor did it allow us to live in a non condemned building. Welfare is far from a free ride if you don't have an illegal source of income.

    113. Re:This won't work by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "Because the scrapyards won't actually do it."

      They will if slapped with a $10,000 fine for not doing it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    114. Re:This won't work by asavage · · Score: 1

      All power lines are ACSR (Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced) in the USA and Canada and I would imagine other parts of the world. Copper wires are used generally for insulated cables. If you want power cables that aren't copper though, you can also buy aluminum and they are approved by the NEC and CSA. I don't think this copper coated steel cable is approved by existing electrical codes.

    115. Re:This won't work by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I completely disagree. The bankster issue is totally separate; back during the boom in the early/mid 2000s, people were stealing this stuff left and right here in Phoenix, even manhole covers. There was no shortage of jobs; the problem is that there's a shortage of free handouts for people who are meth addicts and who can't actually show up for work every day for a normal job. Almost all this thievery, at least around here, was and is done by either meth-heads or illegals. It has absolutely nothing to do with the economy, it has to do with people who either shouldn't be here or who belong in rehab.

      If you really want to stop this problem, I see two methods:
      1) fix the illegal immigration problem, partly through improved border security and immigration enforcement, and partly through letting more water flow through the Colorado River so that people in northern Mexico can return to a farming lifestyle.
      2) crack down on meth addicts (while simultaneously legalizing marijuana), and force meth addicts into state-run rehab facilities rather than prison to help them rid themselves of their addiction.

    116. Re:This won't work by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      No their records will show they sold me W pounds of waste, my records will show I bought W pounds of waste. My records will also show I got X pounds of useable recycled material out of that waste, when I really only got Y, the stuff I bought hot will contribute Z, where the math has been arganged such that Z + Y = X.

      There will be nothing anyone's records but my own to prove a thing; and Z + Y will not be recorded on the office documents but the ones on flash paper, folded up behind the pack of cigarettes next to lighter in my breast pocket.

      This is old type of fraud, yes some people get caught, thousands of others get away with it every day.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    117. Re:This won't work by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Go find your own citation, asshole. Obviously, if tons of people are stealing this shit, they're selling it somewhere.

    118. Re:This won't work by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      They will if slapped with a $10,000 fine for not doing it.

      Now you've created a situation in which law enforcement personnel can demand a bribe of up to $9,999 in order to not enforce the fine.

    119. Re:This won't work by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Funny enough, in our case. Not only was the local MOE(environment) and police supportive of our effort. But so was our insurance company. As long as we maintained the ABC extinguish class labels(fire) markers on the tanks. They were all willing to turn a blind eye, because it meant that they had enough evidence to file civil charges for theft against these people.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    120. Re:This won't work by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Personally... I am in favor of the sniper option as it sends a clear message that looters will be shot (oh the good old days when it was more common place).

      ...as long as your snipers don't carry copper-jacketed rounds...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    121. Re:This won't work by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Mr. Breivik is hardly minimum-security material, not least for his own safety ;-)

      --
      Eat the rich.
    122. Re:This won't work by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Thats a really poor justification for ripping down telecoms wire or becoming a drug dealer.

      I mean, Ive heard the whole "one pot bust ruins your life thing", and Im not sure how true it is; but lets assume it is true, and the laws are unfair. So you break a law, get an unusually harsh sentence, and now its everyone elses fault that youre ripping up telephone wire? Does not compute.

      And I would reckon that if youre a pothead, your problem isnt finding food to eat, as food is quite a bit cheaper than pot. Again, noone even remotely employable (by an incredibly generous standard-- ie anyone mentally stable and not an invalid) is starving in the streets in the US.

    123. Re:This won't work by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The CEO of Enron isnt likely to cause problems by trying to steal cat5 cables for the copper inside.

    124. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Could get a job easily"? Yeahhh ... no. When people say there is a lack of jobs they actually mean it.

    125. Re:This won't work by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Who would recycle metal under those terms? As what is keeping a lot of scrap metal dealers in business is stolen property, what are you trying to do? Put them all out of business?

    126. Re:This won't work by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      The only way to stop this is through stronger laws and law enforcement targeting the scrap-metal dealers.

      While I agree with this sentiment at the level of the problem that this article states, I'd like to add that it is sad that few of us realize the reality of the situation. Bankers have corrupted our system, leaving it in such a state that citizens need to steal parts of our infrastructure (causing orders of magnitude more damage than they benefit financially) in order to survive.

      Oh, that's complete bullshit. Copper prices started rising in 2003, and aside from a fallout between 2008 and 2009, the price for copper has been around 4-5 times what it was in the late 90s. Copper is worth a lot of money. Copper is laying there right out in the open, easy to get your hands on, and easy to sell. The rise in copper theft coincided exactly with the rise in prices, and had nothing to do with a poor economy or high unemployment.

      There is a segment of the population that wants money and doesn't want to do honest work for it. That segment has always existed, and there is no indication that segment will ever go away. If they don't steal copper, they will steal cars. If they don't steal cars, they will break into stores and homes to steal electronics. They will always steal something. The only reason copper theft is such a big issue is the loss of worth it causes. If you steal a car, you might be able to sell it at half price, or you might even be able to chop it and get more than blue book off the parts. If you steal copper, you're usually looking at repair and replacement costs two to three orders of magnitude more than what you sell it for. It's a massive drain on the total wealth of the society, rather than the minor nuisance that theft typically causes.

    127. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There is no other option."

      You aren't able to think beyond the confines of your apparently tiny brain.

      Your parents were too poor to have any business procreating.

      Abstaining from reproducing when you are desperately poor ,
      not theft or poaching wild animals, is the solution. If you are unable to
      do something properly, you simply DO NOT DO IT.

    128. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is BANG ON!!!

      Our company has spent thousands of dollars replacing reflective signs that are made out of aluminum because the thieves steal the signs and get money for scrap aluminum when they sell it... You can't win...

    129. Re:This won't work by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Hmm.. I wonder how well a series of fences would work.. how well it'd slow down the thief if he had to hop each one individually as they are placed just far enough apart to risk falling in between two fences should he try and drape a thick cloth across more than one at a time. Or maybe thieves would just start cutting through the fence instead of hopping over it.

      We are talking 8+ feet tall chain-link fences, and not some little white-picket fence, right?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    130. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People get real desperate when they have hungry kids. When I was a kid my father poached wild game. It was the only way we could afford meat. And my mother ground hogs feed to make bread, because we couldn't afford either bread or grain intended for human consumption. When you are in that kind of situation you do or you die. There is no other option.

      Mr. Gekko, unchecked capitalism is NOT GOOD! (>_<);;; :P

      Eloquently said, Nadaka. Gordon Gekko types would have just told you all to FOADIAF (in a fire) to get rid of you as your family were too poor to buy proper food--much less whatever they had to offer for sale to 'the masses'. Also, they would view you as a drain on their resources due to their payouts into 'the system' if at all for the 'social safety net' if one was available for your family at the time.

      So now we have 'peaceful' socioeconomic revolution in the USA by the downtrodden masses.

      So will there be REAL change for the better for society at large or will we get a replay of 1989 China or 1789 France?

    131. Re:This won't work by radish · · Score: 1

      In the streets? Maybe not. But there are PLENTY of employable (and even employed) people in the US who don't have enough food to feed themselves of their families. The numbers are truly staggering - literally millions of Americans can't afford to eat as much as they need to. That's why places like community foodbanks need to exist. Of course because these people aren't out on the street begging people like you don't think they exist - but they do. I've volunteered at local foodbanks in my area and the stories are heartbreaking - these are normal, decent hardworking people who through a series of events find themselves without the money they need and without help from the state or anyone else, and have to rely on charity. It's an absolute embarrassment to this country and something we should all be utterly ashamed of.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    132. Re:This won't work by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Oh I agree, the local foodbank is doing their inventory on a couple of offlease i threw together for them and some of the stories just make you sick at your stomach, people that worked their asses off only to get stomped on by the system. Everyone is just a single illness away from being destitute yet both the Dems and Reps pander to the rich with ever more tax breaks and attacks to make free medical care some socialist bogeyman when medical bills are the #1 reason folks lose it all. I have a cousin that has to live on a lousy $700 a month in SSI when he is more than smart enough and has the skills to easily be a computer tech or even run his own shop, but he's in a catch 22 where his medicine that allows him to walk costs $96,000 a year (no shit, its more than $9,000 a dose and he gets it every 4 weeks) so if he works he loses his medicine which would leave him unable to work.

      But I don't know if its the same in your area but in my area a single pot bust means you will NEVER get anything above manual labor and we are up to our asses in illegals now. The part that will piss you off is I know a gal that is a state social worker and she's about to quit simply because the bosses force her to give crazy benefits to illegals! An American family will get less than 1/4th what she gives to illegals and when she complained she was told that its political and to STFU. So the whole system is royally fucked and copper stealing is just a symptom of a larger disease, our sliding towards being a third world country.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    133. Re:This won't work by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Tell a meth head they're only getting 50 cents for meth instead of 50 bucks for meth a couple times, they'll figure out that using a magnet might be a good idea.

      Any activity that consumes significant time, yet doesn't pay enough money to support a drug habit, is tantamount to "rehab".

      I've never heard in 20 years of an outage being caused by buried cable being dug up by thieves.

      http://www.nbcchicago.com/traffic/transit/Copper-Wire-Thefts-Interupt-South-Shore-Commuter-Rail-Line-106797133.html

      http://www.thenational.ae/news/uae-news/cables-stolen-from-dubai-electricity-authority-court-hears

      http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local_news/article/Copper-theft-suspects-free-on-bond-627116.php

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    134. Re:This won't work by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      I don't care how desperate you are. Causing $10,000 in damage to get $10 in copper wire is inexcusable. I'd rather see you hold up a gas station for the $200 they had in the register at the time, or mug someone on the street and steal their wallet. They are causing rampant and wanton destruction, for a pittance of a reward.

    135. Re:This won't work by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      It is not only my opinion. See Ron Paul, Occupy Wall Street, Tea Party, Federal Reserve, Military Industrial Complex, Star Chamber, Pat Tillman, etc. Specifics: implementing fractional reserve banking, and creating the Euro to bring all the European countries down with one tug.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    136. Re:This won't work by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Yup,*whoosh* indeed :-) Was this too subtle? It wasn't my intent to make anyone look foolish.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    137. Re:This won't work by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      You can cut up to about 1kcmil of copper (~1" dia.) with readily-obtainable shears (~$200 for a ratcheting shear). Above that, usually it's a pneumatic, hydraulic, or electric shear. Some are more portable than others, though I've never heard of a thief using that sort of equipment. Any live conductor of that size, and the likelihood of the thief living through the attempt is pretty slim. I could see one using it to chop up already-stolen copper though.

      I've never really heard of cable thieves using torches in the field. My use of cutting torches is limited to those which are far less portable than any manual tool though. Maybe there are some which exist that are as portable, cheap, and powerful enough to do the job more efficiently than shears to be used easily in the field. I could understand their use at remote sites where there exists a very small chance of discovery (and hence allowing more time for the theft).

      And yes, I actually would agree that an axe could be used in a pinch. I don't even think it would take much time to cut through an inch of copper cable. I'd try it out of curiosity, but I value my axes too much to subject them to that sort of abuse. :)

    138. Re:This won't work by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      We'd stop asking for more laws if the 1% allowed the existing ones to be applied. Instead, they get the ones they don't like ignored, and injustices require new laws for the justice system (still 100% justice-free).

    139. Re:This won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jean Baptiste Emanuel Zorg from 5th Element had a great point ont his. "You see, father, by causing a little destruction, I am in fact encouraging life."

      I mean, the state does not have any major interest on this, as any such damage does not directly hurt the tax income, rather a constant repair of the infrastructure brings more income for state. I think some company has to hire lobbyists to do the job. If MAFIAAA was able to do achieve their laws, why this industry could not?

    140. Re:This won't work by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. They may dig in to take a sample. It's still damage, but much less.

    141. Re:This won't work by NSash · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid my father poached wild game. It was the only way we could afford meat.

      Did you grow up in Sherwood Forest?

    142. Re:This won't work by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's hard to steal power cables from British railway lines while you're in [...].

      Shit, Romania disappeared!

      Actually, not shit. As long as they all go home before it happens.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    143. Re:This won't work by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You just proved my point, lardass; he was talking about where he's from.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    144. Re:This won't work by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      We'd stop asking for more laws if the 1% allowed the existing ones to be applied. Instead, they get the ones they don't like ignored, and injustices require new laws for the justice system (still 100% justice-free).

      Well then, from a Devil's Advocate perspective, what's the point of new laws if we already know they won't be enforced against those we really want them to be enforced against? We know that these sorts of laws will just be enforced against those without resources to fight or evade them, so it seems like a new law is less desirable than just better enforcing an old law.

    145. Re:This won't work by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The US inherited a lot of attitudes from the Puritans who originally settled in the northeast. Among those attitudes are that crimes must be met with harsh retribution, pleasure and sex are evil but violence against those who are evil is good, and so forth.

    146. Re:This won't work by mysidia · · Score: 1

      And then you have crossed the line from plausible deniability into clear intent.

      The police just have to catch you once dealing with someone whose ID you did not record.

      The crooked dealer can no longer feign ignorance -- one meth-head willing to rat the scrap dealer out to police, for the right $$$ is all it would take.

      Also, in addition to collecting ID, the reporting requirements could include a description of the scrap waste, and the enforcement agency would then have a "book amount" of the amount of material expected to be recycled from a certain weight of a certain kind of waste.

    147. Re:This won't work by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Those caught stealing infrastructure cable should be changed with treason and shot in public without trial.

      No.. Treason has a specific definition: providing aid or comfort to the country's enemies. Self-serving crimes that just hurt other people are not treason. The US is not a monarchy where anyone who defies the king, protests the law, or fails/refuses to follow the law is treasonous.

      I would favor allowing those thieves to remain alive, but denying them all further use of any kind of infrastructure/service provided by copper cable, until they repay for their crime 10-fold.

      For example, they would be placed in a prison with no electricity, therefore, no TV, phone, internet, and they would have no access to newspapers or any benefits of outside world infrastructure.

      Inmates would have to grow their own food. They would have to collect rainwater, and draw supplies from a drinking well by hand.

      And they would be put to labor at other times, installing new cables/repairing cables damaged by copper thieves.

    148. Re:This won't work by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      They aren't, but they are trouted about by the 1% as proof they take the concerns of the 99% seriously. I never said it was a good plan, I just said that's what happens. We ask for Justice, and we get more laws that are insanely specific and unenforced. It's a horrible plan, but that's the best we got.

  5. License scrap cable sales. by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Removing the market for scrap copper cable might also work. Typically this stuff flows thru metals recycling yards who are only too happy to look the other way when white-van-man shows up with a half ton of scrap copper. If these recyclers. or the smaller number of up-stream buyers, had to have paper work from licensed demolition companies or power utilities tracing the copper they buy you could stop the theft very shortly, without having to wait till every mile of copper is stolen and replaced before your deterrence sets in.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    1. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where I'm from a copy of your drivers license and information is recorded with any sale to the scrap yard. If you come in with something like railroad ties, they call the police. This is in a generally rural southern town.

    2. Re:License scrap cable sales. by theycallmeB · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A partial solution that seems to be working here in Oregon: for all scrap sales over a certain (relatively low) amount, the scrap dealer has to mail you a check rather than paying cash on the spot. Having to provide a working mailing address deters thieves, and the time delay discourages the druggies.

    3. Re:License scrap cable sales. by smpoole7 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We desperately need that here in Alabama. At present, there are plenty of crooked scrap dealers who buy the copper, then immediately load it on trucks and take it up to Tennessee, where it's melted within a matter of days. Even if you mark the copper, it doesn't make a bit of difference. It's long gone by the time the police show up to ask questions.

      I agree. Take pictures of anyone selling scrap metal. Get their ID.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    4. Re:License scrap cable sales. by smpoole7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So ... let me ask you this, Goebbels. (Hey, if you can invoke Geoffrey, I'll invoke him right back.)

      A bunch of teenage-and-twenty-something kids come into your facility with a huge bundle of telecom cable. The insulation has been burned off. You just KNOW that they're legit; right? You don't even ask for ID?

      Sorry, dood, but you ARE part of the problem. Calling me a Nazi for pointing that out to you doesn't change that fact.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    5. Re:License scrap cable sales. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Define unreasonable? If I lost the ability to call 911 because of copper thieves, I'd be pretty pissed myself. I'm personally surprised that it's taken this long to become a priority. Guess the FBI finally got tired of looking at kiddie porn.

    6. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Very clever...

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:License scrap cable sales. by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      Or it could just create an underground gray market for the stuff, and we'd be left with do-it-yourself copper foundries, copper home hoarders, copper traffickers that drive/ship the stuff abroad (or to a State/County where the enforcement is not as strict as where it was originally stolen from), and copper laundering facilities (where the copper is given a new clean title and resold on the legal copper market).

    8. Re:License scrap cable sales. by mysidia · · Score: 2

      All that adds costs for the bad guys, that eventually exceed the market value of copper in the first place.

    9. Re:License scrap cable sales. by plover · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, that thing tends to regulate itself a bit. Most copper thieves just aren't that organized. And if there was a "Tony 'The Electric Fence' Soprano" running a stolen copper wire laundering scam, the thieves would have to know about him, know where to find him, and be given the instructions to make the drop off in a private place. While tougher rules generally don't stop professional thieves, they do slow the crimes of opportunity by removing the easy market for the stuff.

      --
      John
    10. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Michigan requires valid photo ID.

    11. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, the solution to the problem of people stealing copper because they cannot get a decent jobs is ... to create more unemployed people by increasing the burding on construction, demolition, scrap companies and everyone related to them?

      Driving people with the skill and knowledge to dismantle and process scrap metal into unemployement ... what could possibly go wrong?

    12. Re:License scrap cable sales. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Removing the market for scrap copper cable might also work.

      Yeah, because removing the market for drugs has been so successful.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    13. Re:License scrap cable sales. by icebike · · Score: 2

      Seems to me that letting thieves continue to tear down transmission lines so that you can employ people to put them back up is a bit of the broken windows fallacy, no?

      If you are a legitimate business, why are you buying two miles of fire blackened copper cable a week after the big power failure in the next county?
      Skill and knowledge in fencing stolen property is not a precursor to a strong economy.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    14. Re:License scrap cable sales. by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      How is that enforced ? How do you know the dealer did not pay in cash, since cash is basically untraceable ?

    15. Re:License scrap cable sales. by julesh · · Score: 2

      I don't know how it's *actually* enforced, but if I were running the scheme there'd be undercover spot checks -- I'd send people in to sell some copper and demand payment in cash, perhaps the first time or perhaps after they've been through the whole check thing a few times, and see if they get anywhere.

    16. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      This is to prevent theft, not protect the environment (though cutting down on the wire -> scrap -> wire cycling will certainly help the latter).

      There is no need to have a watch list or whatever. Just require that any scrap dealer obtain ID when collecting scrap, and mail payment to the address on the ID after 30 days or whatever. Scrap dealers would then have to maintain traceability of their inventory, and perhaps hold onto stuff for a few days in case the police drop by.

      And this need not be applied to everything - just stuff that tends to get stolen because of high value. Pawn shops already operate under rules like these.

    17. Re:License scrap cable sales. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I can think of a couple of ways

      1: undercover spot checks, send someone in with a load of copper and see if they can get cash for it and/or set up survielance for a while to see if any cash transactions are made.
      2: cross-check the company books. For each unit of scrap metal the dealer sells check he has corresponding records for incoming scrap metal. If the dealers records show a suspisciously high volume of small transactions then start watching him more closely (e.g you could count the cars in and out of the yard and compare it to the transaction count).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    18. Re:License scrap cable sales. by vlm · · Score: 1

      Or it could just create an underground gray market for the stuff... copper traffickers ... copper laundering facilities

      You don't need anything that complicated. You just need one plumber with an addiction problem to accept copper pipe and brass fittings, and one electrician with an addiction problem to accept wire/cable. That's all. No complicated hollywood movie plot required. You don't need the whole mafia thing to pull this off.

      Coincidentally, when the missing pipe/cable is discovered, the addicted plumber/electrician is going to make a handy profit installing new pipe/cable, so its not like they're going to be in opposition to the idea.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    19. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      You can melt copper in a campfire. Get a little creative and you can actually cast it into ingots in your backyard.

    20. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      That and require traceability (identifying where it went, who it was sold to, etc), and perhaps a holding period before you can do anything with it.

      Audit scrap dealers, and so on. If you catch a thief treat them like a druggie and get them to snitch and then nail the dealer to the wall. The key is to remove the profit incentive, and that means controlling the legitimate copper trade.

    21. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I dunno. You get a whole distribution network for drugs because they're REALLY cheap to make and expensive on the street. The value of copper probably isn't high enough to sustain a while industry. I can see opportunists grabbing some wire and selling it for $200 at a scrap shop. I can't see people setting up smelting operations and turning out pipes and wires and such. Right now they're only sourcing scrap copper which has enough margin to make the theft profitable. If they have to replicate the whole manufacturing process then you're competing against legitimate industry and your initial margins will get wiped out fast as all the downstream steps are more costly.

    22. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      There isn't nearly as much money in copper, and it is in itself a legitimate industry so it isn't like the black market is the sole supplier and can dictate the price. Any black market that is established will never be able to charge more than legitimate industry does, and that puts a cap on their profits. Since the black market is likely to be inefficient at every step chances are it won't work.

      If Walmart sold what are currently illegal narcotics you'd see the drug cartels die off within a few years at most. Their skillset isn't actually making drugs so much as evading the law, and if you remove the value of the latter then they will find it much harder to compete.

    23. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Pope · · Score: 1

      Dead junkies don't buy drugs.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    24. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having spoken to several scrap dealers recently, they do this if the state tells them to.
      In Nebraska, for instance, all non-ferrous scrap sales require a copy of ID and a thumbprint.

      At one I spoke with, the above applies, and all vehicles coming and going (empty) are photographed.

    25. Re:License scrap cable sales. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does pay the bills though.

    26. Re:License scrap cable sales. by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      This doesn't have jack shit to do with the "environment." Why would you even be that disingenuous as to bring it up?

      This is all about certain business owners who are all too happy to turn a blind eye to obvious crime in order to make a buck for themselves.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    27. Re:License scrap cable sales. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Probably the same way they enforce everything not trackable, they do a test. Someone comes in and tries to get the payment in cash.

  6. big problem by bball99 · · Score: 2

    'round these parts - thieves are stealing HVAC units from the roofs of closed businesses, schools, etc.

    the problem is that the recyclers are paying in cash, and unless get wary when presented with a hundred or so bronze flower vases from a cemetery, just do a quick nod and a wink on the payout

  7. Used by hams for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Copper clad steel has been used by hams for decades. It is most effective at radio frequencies, where the "skin effect" causes the current flow to exist primarily in the outermost regions of the cable. 50 or 60 Hz AC current is not high enough frequency to have much of a skin effect, so it will consequently be a poor conductor compared to solid copper. There's no doubt that it is harder to cut, though.

    1. Re:Used by hams for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that HAM-radio operations are low-down, dirty theives.

      I will make sure to give each I see the stink-eye.

    2. Re:Used by hams for decades by jampola · · Score: 1

      Okay, so I will keep an eye out for anyone who looks like the Comic Store Guy wheeling a trolley full of copper.

    3. Re:Used by hams for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No he's saying that as a conductor, steel (iron) is about five times worse than copper and also that at RF frequencies the electrons are travelling through the surface of the conductor as opposed to the core (skin effect).

      GroundSmart's implied claim about steel being a better conductor than copper is bogus:

      Unlike conventional cables made from solid copper, the GroundSmart Copper Clad Steel Cable consists of a steel core bonded to a copper outer casing, forming an equally effective but far less valuable cable by exploiting the corrosion-resistance of copper with the conductive properties of steel.

      The benefit to steel here is making the cable stronger (longer spans) and more resistant to cutting.

    4. Re:Used by hams for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copper clad goes back a very long way. I've seen examples of open wire communication lines installed in the early part of the 1900s that were copper clad iron or steel for the external corrosion resistance. This isn't really anything new.

    5. Re:Used by hams for decades by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      The benefit to steel here is making the cable stronger (longer spans) and more resistant to cutting.

      I wonder about that; I thought one of the reasons they used aluminum for high-voltage power lines was because it weighs much less, and that this enabled longer spans than denser material. Steel is dense and heavy; even though it is indeed very strong, wouldn't this be a giant disadvantage for spans?

    6. Re:Used by hams for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, high voltage lines tend to not carry much current anyways. Electrical power is the product of current AND voltage. So the higher the voltage the less current you need. That is why high voltages are used in the first place - to minimize the size of the wire required to transmit power. Also, even 60hz. current does still mostly flow on the surface of the conductor. This is why stranded wire conducts better than solid in 60hz. power applications - there is more surface area.

    7. Re:Used by hams for decades by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      At the high transmission level, yes, but that's not what's targeted by (living) copper thieves.

      The largest they get are residential transmission lines, where the span isn't long enough for the additional cable weight to matter nearly as much as it does for high transmission lines.

    8. Re:Used by hams for decades by Formalin · · Score: 1

      RG-6 is ancient, and it has a copper-clad steel conductor.

    9. Re:Used by hams for decades by dbc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not much current??? Ummm... better double check that. The US power line infrastructure is stretched to the breaking point. Most 21KV and up lines are running near their max rated current.

      To the GP -- Aluminum is much more conductive than steel, and in power lines the cables are large enough that they have enough tensile strength to easily make the spans that power lines are designed for. Aluminum is lower loss than steel for 60 Hz. I've been making ham antennas out of CopperWeld since 1972, usually #12 solid, sometimes #10 solid. It is nassssty to cut. I use nail nippers these days, or a hack saw if I don't have a nail nipper handy. Small bolt cutters would be good. #12 soft-drawn copper doesn't stand up to icing all that well for larger antennas. CopperWeld is much stronger. (CopperWeld is the Cooper trademark, other vendors make copper-clad steel wire.) I think CopperWeld dates from around "The War", as my parents generation called it -- WW II.

    10. Re:Used by hams for decades by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Steel (iron) is lighter than copper.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    11. Re:Used by hams for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i had to hold my breath to stop a coffee incident on my keyboard

    12. Re:Used by hams for decades by msauve · · Score: 1

      I, too, have used CopperWeld for years, saw this article and thought "that's nothing new."

      A quick Google, and one finds that Copperweld has been around for almost 100 years. I guess it's just slashvertising.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    13. Re:Used by hams for decades by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      and those are NOT copper. Not unless they are more than 30 years old.

      I worked as a journeyman electrician in the late 80's and even then no copper was used from the pole to the home.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Used by hams for decades by vlm · · Score: 1

      Some have steel core, some dont. I think you may be confusing this with the much more common cable TV aerial drop cable that has a steel leader line with RG-6 hanging beneath it.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    15. Re:Used by hams for decades by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Steel is only about 0.88 times as light as copper. However, it's about 10 times worse a conductor, as seen here, so a cable ten times thicker is going to be much heavier than an equivalent copper cable.

      Aluminum, however, is only about 1.5 times worse a conductor than copper, while being 0.30 times as dense, so it absolutely does make sense to use it instead of copper for long runs.

    16. Re:Used by hams for decades by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm no electrician nor power company employee, but I wonder if these lines being stolen are more than 30 years old; there's a lot of old infrastructure around. The residential power lines and transformers behind my (late 60s-built) house look like they're as old as the house.

    17. Re:Used by hams for decades by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      At 60 Hz, the skin depth is 0.981 cm. While that's not exactly deep enough to penetrate a thick transmission line, that's still pretty deep. That's probably partly why they use stranded wire for transmission lines, and solid wire for residential wiring. However, they also use stranded aluminum wire for high-power residential wiring (the wire to your stove and dryer), and the skin depth effect isn't significant there; the real reason is most probably because stranded aluminum wire is much more flexible and easy to work with than solid aluminum wire, which would probably be nearly impossible to work with.

      High voltages are used to minimize I-squared R losses; power consumed (by a resistor, in this case a wire) goes up with the square of current.

    18. Re:Used by hams for decades by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Think of this like a guitar string. You have an inner core for tensile strength, and an outer winding/cladding for your desired tone.

      Copper has better mallebility, aluminum is crap. There's a huge reason why aluminum wiring is banned in most houses/apartments in the USA.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    19. Re:Used by hams for decades by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      Aluminum wiring is NOT banned at all; if you live in the USA, go open up your breaker box and look at the wire coming from the distribution pole, and then look at the wires going to your stove and your dryer. It's all aluminum.

      The only reason they stopped using aluminum for the 110V circuits is because a bunch of morons used outlets and other parts that had copper terminals, and just connected the aluminum wire to them. Aluminum has a different rate of thermal expansion than copper, so over multiple hot/cold cycles (called seasons), the joints loosened up, and they started having arcing, which caused fires (it didn't help that older wires had more flammable jackets than today's PVC insulation; a lot of it even had paper filler inside to keep the different wires separate!).

      Having an outer cladding of copper will only work if that "cladding" is about 1cm thick, which I seriously doubt is the case here. At 60Hz, the skin effect is very minor. Maybe if they bump the frequency up to 400Hz....

    20. Re:Used by hams for decades by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "if you live in the USA, go open up your breaker box and look at the wire coming from the distribution pole, and then look at the wires going to your stove and your dryer. It's all aluminum."

      Nope. It's all copper. I watched them install both 150A lines before moving into this condo.

      To quote them "Aluminum? Are you fucking stupid?"

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    21. Re:Used by hams for decades by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "(it didn't help that older wires had more flammable jackets than today's PVC insulation"

      Never heard of ceramic wiring? It's ceramic-clad and is what was used in place of asbestos. The entire house can burn down and the electrical system would still be functional. It's what's run through the interior of this condo. It unfortunately makes it a major pain to install new outlets.

      Oh, and the entire circuit breaker? Bus bar is solid copper.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    22. Re:Used by hams for decades by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      It is nassssty to cut. I use nail nippers these days, or a hack saw if I don't have a nail nipper handy.

      WTF? Are they for grooming the claws on your pet brontosaurus?

      Oh, nail nippers.. sorry! Pardon my ignorance, but what exactly *are* nail nippers?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    23. Re:Used by hams for decades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the maximum rating, anyway? A few thousand amps? (Dumping the entire max output of the hoover dam, all 2080MW of it, into a 400kV line gives ~5200A.)

    24. Re:Used by hams for decades by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I don't know where you live, but around here (AZ) aluminum is normally used for high-power circuits. Go to Home Depot and look at the wiring there that's sold by the foot. The big stuff is all aluminum.

      And to quote you, "Are you fucking stupid"? There's nothing wrong with aluminum, which is why it's used in high-voltage transmission lines. For residential installations, it has to be stranded so that it's easier to work with. Combined with a corrosion inhibitor and proper terminals, it's not a problem. It's only small-minded people who think there's a problem because some moron told them once "aluminum is bad, mmkay?". It's the same mentality that makes people think "nuclear power is bad, mmkay?": some people try it eons ago, do something wrong, it causes catastrophe, so small-minded idiots don't want to use it any more because they can't think of anything in terms of more than 2 variables. It's also the same mentality that leads Americans to think that anyone who doesn't agree with their political party's platform must automatically be part of the other party.

    25. Re:Used by hams for decades by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminum_wire

      "Building wire in US jurisdictions now uses the new 8000 alloy of aluminum as specified by the National Electrical Code (NEC). Contractors are also using larger sizes of aluminum building wire for low voltage feeders where the savings over copper is significant due the lower weight."

      "Aluminum wire in transmission and distribution applications is still the preferred material today."

      http://www.accurateelectricalservices.com/CA-Electrician/electrical-wiring/anaheim-aluminum-wiring-facts-fallacies

      The problem with aluminum wiring is that it requires more than 2 brain cells to work with. Apparently, that's not a problem in the electrical power generation and transmission industry, where they use aluminum all the time, but in residential building and repair (where the worker is either a contractor or the homeowner himself), that's asking too much.

    26. Re:Used by hams for decades by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Aluminum is brittle, moreso than iron. Welcome to earthquake country.

      Aluminum is not a desirable material in an area prone to tectonic shifting which can cause strain on cables. Aluminum Romex is shit in these areas.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    27. Re:Used by hams for decades by Khyber · · Score: 1

      8000 alloy is aluminum-lithium, not aluminum. Not core-clad wire at all, by any means, which is what we're discussing.

      Aluminum wire sucks for structural failures, which is why it's not used out here in my area very often.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    28. Re:Used by hams for decades by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Last I heard, the majority of the transmission infrastructure in the US was 50 or more years old. I don't have a way to actually verify that though.

      That said, I was indeed incorrect in what I had believed about the composition of modern high-voltage conductors. They're copper- or aluminum-clad steel, the tensile strength of which outweighs the increased load and allows for longer spans than all-aluminum or all-copper conductors.

    29. Re:Used by hams for decades by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Surely they use aluminum wire for transmission lines out there?

    30. Re:Used by hams for decades by dbc · · Score: 1

      A nail cutting nipper is a high-leverage wire cutter beefy enough to cut off a framing or roofing nail. Or cut steel fence wire, or such. A junior size cable cutter -- (aircraft cable, not electrical cable). Googling "diamond n10 nail cutting nipper" turned up this Amazon link.

      http://www.amazon.com/Diamond-N10-10-Inch-Cutting-Nipper/dp/B00002N7PG

    31. Re:Used by hams for decades by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Nope, as we still have problems with copper thieves causing blackouts in some areas.

      The wires going right to my house are solid copper.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    32. Re:Used by hams for decades by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, I mean the high-voltage transmission lines, like the 765kV long-distance lines, but also the lines going from your local transformer to the distribution center (this usually operates at 36kV IIRC).

    33. Re:Used by hams for decades by Khyber · · Score: 1

      It's the local transformer line being stolen, still solid copper. HVTs are steel-copper from what I've personally cut into during contractor positions for tower splice repairs.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  8. JOBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if there were some jobs in this country people wouldn't have to steal copper. It didn't happen NEARLY as much a few years back and I doubt the number of meth heads has increased that much since then. 8.5% unemployment is bullshit, it's more like 15% if you count everyone, not just the people currently getting benefits. Also, why not do something about the places that buy the scrap metal?

    1. Re:JOBS by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Maybe if there were some jobs in this country people wouldn't have to steal copper. It didn't happen NEARLY as much a few years back and I doubt the number of meth heads has increased that much since then. 8.5% unemployment is bullshit, it's more like 15% if you count everyone, not just the people currently getting benefits. Also, why not do something about the places that buy the scrap metal?

      Correlation != causation.

      It could just be that criminals that have always been stealing stuff, have now found that stealing copper cables involves far less risk, and better rewards than stealing from people's houses.

      There's far more statistics to be done to understand any of the underlying causes... but you know, blindly blaming it on a bad economy works just as well.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    2. Re:JOBS by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It didn't happen NEARLY as much a few years back and I doubt the number of meth heads has increased that much since then

      A glance at this graph will give you a swift education on why copper theft has increased recently.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    3. Re:JOBS by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Of course its nothing to do with the recent peak in the price of copper.

    4. Re:JOBS by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      It could just be that criminals that have always been stealing stuff, have now found that stealing copper cables involves far less risk, and better rewards than stealing from people's houses.

      It could be, sure. But seriously, which do you think is more likely?

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    5. Re:JOBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was visiting a friend in a suburb of Pittsburgh. His neighbor put out a broken vacuum and a broken table fan next to the garbage can in front of his house. My friend commented that "someone's gonna score". He bet me that within 20 minutes someone would come by and cut and take the power cords. 5 minutes later a dude stops and cuts the cords and busted the head off the fan off and threw them in the back of his truck which was already full of random stuff. Obviously this recycling effort pays for at least his gas to drive around different neighborhoods. In the next hour, I saw no less then four other people driving around looking through the garbage.

      Around where I live in northern VA, people are always stealing copper pipes and wires from new and empty houses. Someone recently took some pipes for a heating oil supply tank and it ended up draining into the basement.

    6. Re:JOBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just replaced all of the copper plumbing in my house with CPVC. Cost was most of the reason, the other was I have acidic well water and it eats the copper pipes. The pipes were thin wall copper (L grade) and many of them were paper thin and springing random leaks after just 20 years.

    7. Re:JOBS by hitmark · · Score: 1

      And it matches up nicely with the current downturn in the economy...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    8. Re:JOBS by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      It didn't happen NEARLY as much a few years back and I doubt the number of meth heads has increased that much since then.

      No, but the price of copper has ... duh!

      --
      No sig today...
    9. Re:JOBS by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      More likely is that the price of copper has gone up massively over the last few years.

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:JOBS by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is not a new problem. 20 -30 years ago, people were going around with chain saws and cutting down aluminium traffic light poles when the price of aluminium went through the roof. Theft always goes up in an economic down-turn, but we'll also always have that "base-line" of thieves who will steal because it's "what they do," not out of necessity.

      The real problem is that the damage lingers long after the economy recovers, as people who had to bend corners continue to bend corners. Eventually, it reaches the highest levels, such as BoA, CitiBank, AIG, as "just doing business."

    11. Re:JOBS by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      Which proves that the Lesser Depression was caused by a rise in the price of copper.

    12. Re:JOBS by Gwala · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind charting any commodity versus the US dollar - the US dollar has depreciated in value fairly substantially since 2008. So that big spike isn't a rise in Copper (although it may be a contributing factor), it's the lowering of the US dollar.

      --
      #!/bin/csh cat $0
    13. Re:JOBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Overtaxing? Is that what we're calling the lowest tax rates in 75 years now?

      Your bridge, paid shill/troll/moron... it beckons you return.

    14. Re:JOBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are artists that work on adding erections on price curves, or are they trying to draw a hand? :p

    15. Re:JOBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOOL. So you think the dollar is 5 times less valuable than it was 5 years ago? no other currencies have risen by an equivalent amount, even those currencies immune from western printing presses. something doesn't add up with your argument, like the numbers. maybe commodities are valuable due to 20x the US population growing at 7% GDP.....

    16. Re:JOBS by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      Shenanigans. You want to see a period of substantial depreciation in the dollar, look at the graph for 1975-85: 15% inflation, but copper prices stayed relatively flat.

      Somebody's gaming the copper market, just like they gamed the oil market when oil spiked up to $140 a few years ago...

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    17. Re:JOBS by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Angry authoritarian Lesbian Hillary Clinton, is that you?!

      Dude, you often argue good points. Snowgirl also makes a good argument here; don't let yourself down with ad-hominems just because you disagree.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  9. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by stanlyb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why stop here? Why not death penalty even if you get one little tiny hamburger. And his/her relatives in prison. For life.

  10. More importantly. by Glarimore · · Score: 1

    Less copper in the cable = less expense in raw materials

    Of course, this is for the same reason that people are stealing the cable in the first place: copper is EXPENSIVE.

  11. I have an idea by jampola · · Score: 1

    Just send 20'000vac through that outer sleeve, that would act as a great deterrent!

    1. Re:I have an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except when someone comes along with wooden or plastic handled cutters and hacks it off from one side, goes to the other side and hacks that off... well shit, looks like that whole massive middle section suddenly has no power running through it.

  12. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like it, though I'd execute the children, too. A crime-free society is less than a generation away.

    We think much alike, you and I.

  13. 60 Million a Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Squirrels probably do 60M in damages a year...

    1. Re:60 Million a Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Goddamn nihilists.

    2. Re:60 Million a Year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just nuts.

  14. Reward system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Pay scrap metal recyclers large rewards for turning in thieves (if convicted)

  15. Easier solution by Leuf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pirates use the copper in the lines to steal trillions of dollars worth of copyrighted materials. By stealing the copper, you are stealing the copyrighted materials that were transferring across them. Since we can't determine exactly how much copyrighted material was in the copper at the time, we need to assume it's at least 10 million dollars worth per foot. Since we'll never be able to recover this money from thieves desperate enough to steal copper, we simply need to authorize the RIAA and MPAA to shoot anyone suspected of stealing copper on sight.

    1. Re:Easier solution by kheldan · · Score: 1

      STFU, you'll give them ideas.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    2. Re:Easier solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I... I can find nothing wrong with this argument.

  16. Is the upfront cost less? by Zakabog · · Score: 1

    Is the upfront cost less than or close to that of just a pure copper solution? If not then it's not likely going to be implemented. I knew a couple people who worked for the electric company, they'd come home with 20lb buckets of scrap. Just a dozen short pieces pieces of very large gauge copper wire, that stuff I'd say would be worth stealing if you knew you could do it without frying yourself (an unlikely possibility unless you had a lot of experience with high voltage lines) but going down the street taking down power lines with a chainsaw, seems like you'd be better off driving into a convenience store with a pickup truck and running off with an ATM machine.

    1. Re:Is the upfront cost less? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're ignoring TCO. If the cost of copper deployment is less than the cost of copper-clad steel cable which would you use? What if you have to replace 10% of your cable network each year due to thieves and copper-clad steel is only 5% more?

    2. Re:Is the upfront cost less? by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      Most copper theft is from abandoned/foreclosed homes. Pipes and wires are ripped out shortly after the home is left, the new owners cover that cost and they're not worried about someone stealing the cables and pipes while they're still living in the home. Maybe some small places where utility wires can and are stolen more easily and frequently will want to implement this solution, but then the more expensive cable will now be stolen because the thieves think it's copper wire. Unless everyone was using the same wire and it was just "known" that looking at some wires they're not going to be copper, people are still going to try and steal the cable.

    3. Re:Is the upfront cost less? by flonker · · Score: 1

      I've also heard of copper theft from new construction/remodeling. The copper wiring/plumbing gets put in during the day, and gets taken out again that very night.

    4. Re:Is the upfront cost less? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > running off with an ATM machine

      A standard ATM machine, or one of those automated teller ATM machines?

    5. Re:Is the upfront cost less? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And once you've stolen an "ATM machine", you won't be needing your "PIN number" to get money out of it.

      You tard.

  17. Source on the Pitcher theft? by JayTech · · Score: 1

    Is there any source on the Pitcher utility line theft story? I can't find anything. I doubt the "blackout" was a very big deal considering that the town is a ghost town with only six residences remaining. The town has been basically dead since it was declared a superfund site, and then a tornado hit a few years ago and wiped away the rest. Kind of puts that part of the story in perspective...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Picher,_Oklahoma

    1. Re:Source on the Pitcher theft? by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      Is there any source on the Pitcher utility line theft story?

      I believe it's the first link in the summary, but I could be wrong: NYTimes, 7-Feb-2011

      Thieves broke into a muffler shop in Chillicothe, Ohio, and stole cash — and 130 catalytic converters. Pervasive thefts of copper wire from under the streets of Fresno, Calif., have prompted the city to seal thousands of its manhole covers with concrete. And in Picher, Okla., someone felled the town’s utility poles with chain saws, allowing thieves to abscond with 3,000 feet of wire while causing a blackout.

    2. Re:Source on the Pitcher theft? by scdeimos · · Score: 2
      Actually, it seems the NYT borrowed their content without attribution (so unlike them) from a 4-Mar-2010 article from the Joplin Globe:

      PICHER, Okla. — Theft of copper from utilities and other businesses is nothing new, but officials say some brazen thieves took the crime up a notch — and should consider themselves lucky they’re not dead, even if they haven’t been caught yet.

      The thieves made off with 3,000 feet of copper wire and some aluminum wire after cutting down numerous utility poles northeast of Picher, causing a temporary power outage for a handful of Empire District Electric Co. customers.

      “They were sawed off at ground level with a chain saw,” Empire spokeswoman Amy Bass said of the six poles.

      ...

      Nine residents were without power for several hours Wednesday. The lines apparently were cut about 7:30 a.m.

      ...

      Empire District Electric Co. is offering a $10,000 reward for information that leads to a conviction in the copper-theft case at Picher. Officials said they are asking people who might have information about the case to call local law enforcement.

      http://www.joplinglobe.com/local/x1399736758/Copper-thieves-cut-poles-energized-lines-in-Picher-buyout-area/

    3. Re:Source on the Pitcher theft? by JayTech · · Score: 1

      I believe it's the first link in the summary, but I could be wrong: NYTimes, 7-Feb-2011

      Thanks, I read that after I took a few seconds to bypass the paywall. I guess the NYT is a source, but unfortunately the story is very devoid of facts... only that one line on the theft (and an interview with a scrap metal guy and a politician unrelated to the incident)? Not one snippet anywhere else on any of the major news sites? Either I'm not looking hard enough (probably) or the theft was conjured up to add some drama to the story... anyone to disprove that silly theory?

    4. Re:Source on the Pitcher theft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the siblings of your post -- one has a link to a more detailed article in Pitcher's local media.

  18. I like this solution by VAElynx · · Score: 1

    Neat , saves material, too - even though manufacture is more expensive, I guess the saving on copper is worth it. I guess the thing it exploits is that at high voltages you only get current near the surface of a conductor (which is why many things use braided wire)

    1. Re:I like this solution by smpoole7 · · Score: 1

      It's not the voltage, it's the frequency. The wire acts as an inductor, leading to "skin effect" -- most of the signal travels in the outer "skin" of the conductor, and very little current flows in the center.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    2. Re:I like this solution by smpoole7 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, to further clarify: higher frequencies == more skin effect. Although ... I've been told that one reason why you can't find AC conductors much larger than 500 and 1000 MCM is because, even at 60 Hz, skin effect becomes significant.

      (YMMV on that last one.)

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    3. Re:I like this solution by VAElynx · · Score: 1

      *headdesk* You are absolutely right... I should have remembered from last year, but then, i'm a mechanical engineering student, not an electrician.

  19. Criminalize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...the purchase of stolen copper. And make a few big-time new story examples out of violators. That'll put a serious dent in the problem.

    1. Re:Criminalize... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Purchase of stolen goods is already illegal...
      This is why copper is an attractive target, it can easily be melted down to remove any markings or indication of what the copper was previously used for.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  20. Oh, I Know All About This One. by smpoole7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As someone who has been hit repeatedly by these morons, a few thoughts. Radio in general offers a very attractive target to these thieves, especially (believe it or not) older installations like AM radio stations. (At low frequencies like AM, the tower itself is actually the antenna -- that's why there are insulators in the guy wires -- and the tower field is laced with gobs and gobs of soft copper that acts as the ground plane.)

    1. Copper-clad steel is nothing new. Some of this is just marketroid hype (though to be fair, I don't think anyone has ever made clad *telcom* cable before). But other types of clad conductors have been common for some time -- not just to deter theft, but because of the price of copper.

    2. The real problem is the scrap metal dealers. You can't tell me that they're not suspicious when a couple of teenage guys come dragging in the core from a big honkin' three phase HVAC unit. But THEY want the copper even worse than the thieves, because they turn around and sell it in ton lots at a huge profit.

    3. Copper is considerably more conductive than steel. We can get away with it at RF frequencies because of skin effect (i.e., the signal travels through the "skin" of the conductor, rather than the center), but it's not a perfect solution. It's much more difficult to work with and it's easy to accidentally strip off the copper cladding, leaving you with far less desirable steel at the connection point.

    4. These thieves really are morons, and yes, most are repeat offenders. They even talk to one another in jail and compare notes. When we were hammered in February of 2010, the deputies who investigated our incident told us that they even knew who most of these people were. We had video cameras and they scoured the images to get a clue as to who it was.

    But sometimes I have to laugh. One of our FM stations here is in the huge metropolis of Pumpkin Center, Alabama, which defines "middle of nowhere." The house up the (dirt) road from the transmitter site has been hit repeatedly; I drove to the site to do routine maintenance a couple of years ago and noted that the air conditioner had been ransacked. But they won't mess with the FM site.

    I guess the fact that our landlady likes to go out and there and shoot with her boyfriend gives them pause. The sight of all those targets with bullet holes all around the center makes them think twice. :)

    Then some thieves tried to cut the gigantic, 6" copper coax going to our 100,000 FM in North Central Alabama. I posted a note that said, "Dear morons, if you try to cut this line, please have your life insurance paid up .... "

    They've stolen our grounding several times since, but they haven't touched that big coax again. :)

    --
    Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    1. Re:Oh, I Know All About This One. by russotto · · Score: 1

      Copper-clad steel is nothing new. Some of this is just marketroid hype (though to be fair, I don't think anyone has ever made clad *telcom* cable before). But other types of clad conductors have been common for some time -- not just to deter theft, but because of the price of copper.

      There's lots of copper-clad aluminum telcom cable. I haven't heard of copper-clad steel being used for it, though.

    2. Re:Oh, I Know All About This One. by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Just offer to give them as much copper as they'd like, delivered in 185 grain increments using a high speed delivery system. Cor Bon DPX should do the trick nicely :).

      Seriously, short of shooting them I don't see anything that could be done on the end of stopping these people. As you say, the answer is in the scrap dealers. Start holding them accountable and the problem will be reduced a ton. I don't see the problem with that either. We have licensing and accountability for all kinds of businesses, it would appear as though scrap dealers need to become one of those.

    3. Re:Oh, I Know All About This One. by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, short of shooting them I don't see anything that could be done on the end of stopping these people.

      I'm with you on this. The softer we are on recidivist criminals the less value we ultimately place on civilised behaviour and the kind of society most of us want.

      Another idea for vigilante justice might be to use the security footage to identify the thieves and trace them (they use their own damn cars most of the time as I understand it). They might learn a lesson if they came home to find *every* piece of plumbing and copper in their own home violently removed, especially if the next day they came to their car to find the entire wiring loom missing.

      There's none so afraid of theft as a thief.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
  21. Nothing new about Copper Clad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is nothing new about 'Copper Clad' or copper covered steel. It has been around for over 65 years - my 1944 copy of the Radio Amateurs Handbook mentions copper clad steel wire for wire antennas.

  22. Fact Check ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "exploiting the corrosion-resistance of copper with the conductive properties of steel"

    Isn't copper the best conductor, second only to silver, but quite weak against corrosion? Stainless steel is by far better against corrosion then copper.
    I think they may have that flipped around...

    1. Re:Fact Check ? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      They never said anything about stainless steel, and in fact, SS would suck for wire because it's rather brittle. Copper is very ductile which is why it's so good for wire, plus, as you said, it's second best next to silver.

      But yes, copper has less-than-stellar corrosion qualities (so does silver), and so does steel, depending on the alloy.

      That marketing statement therefore sounds like a giant load of crap: the corrosion-resistance of copper and the conductive properties of steel sounds like a terrible wire, since copper sucks for corrosion and steel sucks for conductivity. And with a power line frequency of 60Hz, the skin effect is quite minor so the copper cladding isn't going to help much in that department either.

    2. Re:Fact Check ? by swalve · · Score: 1

      In normal atmospheric conditions, copper corrodes pretty quickly, but the corrosion then protects the underlying copper from further corrosion. Unlike steel or iron, where the rust likes to flake off and expose even more of the metal to corrosion. That's why they use copper as flashing on expensive, long life roofs. They do have the conductive thing somewhat backwards. I'm not sure they are saying steel is a better conductor than copper, just that it is a conductor. Because steel is stronger and lighter than copper, you can just upsize the gauge and be OK. I think.

    3. Re:Fact Check ? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The corrosion property of copper that is good is that the corrosion protects the copper below it. With steel, you get rust, which flakes off and does not protect the steel underneath. Perhaps this is what they meant? I thought gold was a better conductor than silver and copper? That is why they use it in connectors. Am I inaccurate in this?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    4. Re:Fact Check ? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. You're right, copper forms a protective coating from corrosion, just like aluminum; the problem with copper corrosion isn't with the wire, it's with the terminations, where it has to mechanically connect to something else, and over time, depending on the design of the termination, the corrosion may interfere. Some terminations probably don't have a big problem with this, if they're designed to physically deform the copper, but something with removable connectors, however, would not be a good place to have copper contacts.

      But about gold, no. Gold is a worse conductor than silver and copper. Not by that much though; it's still a very good conductor, and far, far, far better than steel, but copper and silver are better. Gold's advantage is that it's almost impossible to corrode (except in the presence of certain chemicals that you won't find in most environments, and not just sitting in the air). That's why it's used as a plating in connectors: it protects the material (like copper) below it from air corrosion, and it doesn't corrode itself, while still being a very good conductor. The conduction properties aren't really that important there, since the thickness of the plating is probably on the order of micrometers, so the extra resistance it adds (by being not quite as great as copper) is negligible.

  23. Hang theives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the real sollution. Most of these crimes are perpetrated by repeat offenders. Kill them on the first offence, hell even wait for the third offense, and you'll see these kinds of crimes dwindle to nearly nothing. We keep tollerating this kind of shit from people and that just encourages them to go do it again. They really don't mind jail. Hell they like jail, it's warmer than their home, it has better tv than their home, and the rent and food are free. JAIL DOES NOT WORK! We need a better solution is either jails that are truly terrible places to be, or capital punishment.

    1. Re:Hang theives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get them to read your posts, that'll learn them!

    2. Re:Hang theives by Drishmung · · Score: 2
      Up until about 1820, there were 400 offenses in England that carried the death penalty. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/victorianbritain/lawless/default.htm

      And the prisons were indeed terrible places

      This did not make for a safer, more law-abiding society.

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    3. Re:Hang theives by PPH · · Score: 1

      Prisoners are guaranteed Cable TV in prison by Federal Law.

      Sorry. Someone pulled up all the cable. For the copper.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Hang theives by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think they are more throwing a fit because he crams them into dark green korean war surplus tents in the 115 degree Arizona heat with no cooling and limited water. I think they are more throwing a fit because he also uses hot boxes as additional punishment in those conditions. I think they are more throwing a fit because he is literally running concentration camps here in the US.

    5. Re:Hang theives by shentino · · Score: 1

      Maybe make it so they don't have to steal to survive.

      Do that, and you can shitcan the thieves that keep stealing.

      Unfortunately a lot of it is just plain unadulterated greed of people who only care about themselves.

    6. Re:Hang theives by RoLi · · Score: 1

      Up until about 1820, there were 400 offenses in England that carried the death penalty. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/victorianbritain/lawless/default.htm

      And the prisons were indeed terrible places

      This did not make for a safer, more law-abiding society.

      Actually, it did. Victorian England was a lot safer than today's England.

      From here:

      "The number of indictable offences per thousand population in

      1900 was 2.4 and in 1997 the figure was 89.1."

    7. Re:Hang theives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      americans give a crap about how prisoners are treated? news to me.

    8. Re:Hang theives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously not enough to actually get things to change (yet).

    9. Re:Hang theives by Drishmung · · Score: 1

      1900 is not 1820. 1900 is about two generations later. By 1900 the law had been massively reformed, and policemen had been introduced. The 'Peelers'. With a police presence---the friendly 'Bobby', greater prosperity and reform of many abuses (the sort of thing that Dickens wrote about---and helped change) the crime rate dropped.

      --
      Protoplasm. Quiet Protoplasm. I like quiet protoplasm.
    10. Re:Hang theives by makomk · · Score: 2

      Also, apparently he was so busy arresting illegal immigrants that hadn't committed any crimes and holding prisoners in inhumane conditions that he and his officers completely failed to investigate a huge number of rapes. That hasn't made him terribly popular except with white rapists.

    11. Re:Hang theives by delinear · · Score: 1

      Yes, everyone knows that the best way to deal with people who have little respect for authority is to prove to them beyond doubt, with petty, cruel and humiliating behaviour, that (certain) people in authority deserve no respect.

    12. Re:Hang theives by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The whole idea is that prison isn't supposed to be fun. If you don't like it, then don't commit any crimes.

      No wonder liberals never get anything done; they always focus on the stupidest, most inconsequential issues instead of concentrating on issues that really matter. Instead of making a big deal out of unjust wars like they did with all the protests during the Vietnam era, or making a big deal about civil rights for Citizens with different skin color like they did during the Civil Rights protests, today's moronic generation of liberals bitch and complain about pink underwear for prisoners while multiple wars rage on, and they say nothing about those.

    13. Re:Hang theives by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I think they are more throwing a fit because he crams them into dark green korean war surplus tents in the 115 degree Arizona heat with no cooling and limited water.

      So what? That's the weather here. Don't like it? Go move somewhere colder.

      Our soldiers are in the middle east in 120-130+ temperatures, and they have to wear body armor.

      And, citation needed on the limited water bit. I think you're making that up.

      People have been living here in AZ for several thousand years without A/C. The Anasazi even built a whole canal system here, and they obviously didn't need A/C to do it.

    14. Re:Hang theives by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Were these rapes in the county or one of the cities? The MCSO doesn't really have much in the way of detectives like a city police department, and much of their area is already covered by various city PDs (Phoenix, Tempe, Chandler, Scottsdale, Mesa, etc.). If a rape happens in Mesa, that's the Mesa PD's job to investigate, not the MCSO. If some kid gets lost in the mountains, that's the MCSO's job to mount a search and rescue effort. Joe just happens to like spending his officer's additional time on something that voters like. The areas where MCSO has jurisdiction, which aren't also covered by another municipal PD, are generally very unpopulated areas, except for the Town of Guadalupe which tried once to have their own PD and it was a complete disaster, so they went back to having the MCSO provide police services.

      BTW, illegals have committed a crime, just by coming here without authorization. Try moving to Mexico without authorization from the Mexican government and see what happens to you (hint: it involves a lot of prison time).

    15. Re:Hang theives by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      I think they are more throwing a fit because he crams them into dark green korean war surplus tents in the 115 degree Arizona heat with no cooling and limited water. I think they are more throwing a fit because he also uses hot boxes as additional punishment in those conditions. I think they are more throwing a fit because he is literally running concentration camps here in the US.

      Prison is meant to be a deterrent, not a fucking holiday resort. I say Sheriff Joe has it spot-on.

      If you don't like the idea of that sort of treatment, you have the same opportunity to avoid it as the rest of us: don't do the crime.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    16. Re:Hang theives by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      You forgot: and don't look like a Mexican. because he is ignoring many many crimes committed by whites so he can imprison as many brown people as he possibly can.

      The US constitution demands due process and no cruel or unusual punishment. If you have a problem with that, why do you hate America?

    17. Re:Hang theives by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      You forgot: and don't look like a Mexican. because he is ignoring many many crimes committed by whites so he can imprison as many brown people as he possibly can.

      A fair comment that reveals my ignorance of the full issue. Grishnakh's post is the first I've heard of Sheriff Joe of Arizona and I wasn't aware of the racial controversy. Naturally, as a geek, I want things to be as fair and functional as possible and as such could not support a racist policy such as you describe.

      The US constitution demands due process and no cruel or unusual punishment. If you have a problem with that, why do you hate America?

      Here we hit more of a symantec issue IMHO; what exactly does one define as 'cruel or unusual'? I suspect my definition differs from yours.

      There's also the philosophical (or political?) question of whether one considers prison itself and the loss of one's liberty to be The Punishment for The Crime, or whether prison exists to administer The Punishment for The Crime, with loss of liberty as a given.

      As a kiwi I don't hate the US per se, but rather what it is allowing itself to become. I do very much like your constitution.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    18. Re:Hang theives by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      I had just assumed you were American like me, sorry. The point I am making with the "why do you hate America?" comment is that if you see torture, humiliation, degradation, concentration camps, and death by dehydration and heat stroke to be not "cruel and unusual" then the "justice" you seek is antithetical to the American constitutional ideology.

    19. Re:Hang theives by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      I had just assumed you were American like me, sorry. The point I am making with the "why do you hate America?" comment is that if you see torture, humiliation, degradation, concentration camps, and death by dehydration and heat stroke to be not "cruel and unusual" then the "justice" you seek is antithetical to the American constitutional ideology.

      Again I find it hard to disagree with you, although I'd point out that we're still coming up against personal definitions because I agree that death by dehydration and heat stroke are going too far.

      I want to see a genuine deterrent and I'm sick of what I perceive to be the soft way we treat prisoners here in NZ and find similarities with the states. I guess I just don't believe in rehabilitation (such as we currently employ) which amounts to little more than an advanced university of criminal behaviour ultimately leading to further abuse of honest citizens upon the inmate's release.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    20. Re:Hang theives by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Also, apparently he was so busy arresting illegal immigrants that hadn't committed any crimes

      "Illegal immigrants that hadn't committed any crimes.." That phrase just makes no sense.

    21. Re:Hang theives by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      The problem is that a "genuine deterrent" of humiliation, sensory deprivation, abuse and torture does not work. When someone goes through that it tends to cause severe mental imbalances like post traumatic stress disorder, anti-social behavior depression, paranoia, psychopathy, sociopathy, etc. What your "solution" does is create the most horrible kind of criminal that will never be able to integrate into society under any circumstances and it is only a matter of time before they go on to commit more serious crimes, kill themselves or become institutionalized. This is a known fact supported by pretty much the entire community of psychology.

      The punishment of being in prison is being away from the world. To reform prisoners they need to be shown compassion and understanding, they need therapy, education and training. They do not need to be beaten like a dog until all they can do is bite back.

  24. Copper clad steel isn't new. by russotto · · Score: 1

    It's not new, and while it increases resistance to cutting, it also increases resistance to the flow of electricity (especially at lower frequencies). So you need a heavier and bulkier cable to do the job.

  25. Copper Clad is NOT new by Gim+Tom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uh, the article does not explain what is new about this. Copper clad cable has been around forever. It has been used for High Frequency antennas where the tensile strength of the steel is important and the skin effect keeps the RF currents near the surface. I don't think there is much skin effect at the frequencies they are promoting this cable to be used for. As others have already pointed out, the problem is not limited to electric or communications cable. Plumbing, and HVAC systems are also prime targets. Better regulation of metal recycling and the prosecution of those recyclers who do "look the other way" would go a long way to stopping this problem.

    Of course a few more charred bodies like was found on a building roof near here recently when a copper thief THOUGHT the 660 volt power line to the chillers was disconnected and it wasn't could also be a deterrent

    1. Re:Copper Clad is NOT new by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Replace plumbing with plastic...
      Replace communications cable with fibre...
      All you really have left is power, which is far more dangerous to steal..

      Tighter regulation of recycling will decrease legitimate recycling and increase costs... Those who are already breaking the law, will continue breaking the law for even higher returns.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    2. Re:Copper Clad is NOT new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA is about telecoms cables, not power cables.

    3. Re:Copper Clad is NOT new by pngai · · Score: 1

      GroundSmart Copper Clad Steel Cable is not a telecom cable. It is a ground cable, intended for direct burial without any insulating jacket. It does not carry signal or any power (normally). This is the kind of thing it is intended for: http://www.w8ji.com/ground_systems.htm

  26. Fiber by MetricT · · Score: 1

    Of course, if we had that fiber network we've paid for several times over in telephone fees, that would also deter thieves from stealing copper too...

    1. Re:Fiber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until glass becomes more and more expen... oh wait.

  27. Holy runon sentence, Batman! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Pervasive thefts of copper wire from under the streets of Fresno, California have prompted the city to seal thousands of its manhole covers with concrete and in Picher, Oklahoma, someone felled the town's utility poles with chain saws, allowing thieves to abscond with 3,000 feet of wire while causing a blackout as the theft of copper cables in costs US companies $60 million a year and the FBI says it considers theft of copper wire to be a threat to the nation's baseline ability to function"

    Somewhere, an English teacher weeps.

    Good thing we've got editors, right?

  28. yea cause no one by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    scraps steel for money

    1. Re:yea cause no one by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Last time I looked, admittedly, a couple years ago, scrap steel wasn't worth hauling in unless you had a dozen tons of it and were within 10 miles of the recycling center. Otherwise, you weren't even making gas money.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    2. Re:yea cause no one by vlm · · Score: 2

      Last time I looked, admittedly, a couple years ago, scrap steel wasn't worth hauling in unless you had a dozen tons of it and were within 10 miles of the recycling center. Otherwise, you weren't even making gas money.

      Oh I wouldn't go that far. You're looking at least at $250 per ton, maybe as much as $500 for high quality stampings from a factory. Now that is darn near an order of magnitude less than copper, but you certainly run a profit vs gas money on steel/cast iron. Lets say you have a 1 ton trailer on the back of your 10 MPG pickup truck, that's costing at least 50 cents per mile so you don't lose money until you drive more than 500 miles. Very few thieves live more than 500 miles from a junkyard, but I suppose its possible in the wilds of alaska, although there's probably not much to steal there.

      To give you an idea, there are scrap services in my area who will drive to your location, and dispose of your old stove or washer/dryer for you, for free. They burn some gas to drive to your house, burn an hour of windshield and loading time, and recycle the steel to pay themselves. They make an "ok" living doing this. If they can make an "ok" living for a normal person, I assume a meth head could keep himself in rocks pretty well as an illegal recycler. Note this is an "ok" income for unskilled work such as working at mcdonalds or walmart, not "ok" income as in I'm going to quit my computer science related job and buy a truck... Also these guys don't just crush and recycle, they sell the parts on ebay, so if you need a new timer for a '98 kenmore, they've probably got it. And this whole business is rotten to the core, so you know there's very little income tax being paid, used parts are going to be boxed up and sold by repairmen as new parts, etc, so its actually more profitable that you'd think on the surface.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:yea cause no one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know steel theft is a problem in my area and we have Europe-like gas prices.

    4. Re:yea cause no one by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      At the time I mentioned, the scrap yards were paying $18/ton max.

      Like I say, 2 years ago, and in a little corner of Arizona far far away from the press of civilisation.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  29. the root of the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The root of the problem isn't making things a bitch to steal. It's the psychopathic globalist agenda which is making wars, and corporations making law, so everything is shutting down and going bust. This symptom, "stealing copper" is a seed test to see if they can create another Problem, Reaction Solution saga when the public finally gets sick of the unemployed gangs (or whoever the msm gets the people to blame) stealing the copper, let the police shoot them the public will cry, and then we'll hear about all these copper thieves being shot, and then shooting back, and then more public outcry, another new law ban the guns, then more cops, more psychopathic bullshit.

    1. Re:the root of the problem by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Geez, guy, get a grip. Copper is easy to steal and fence; times are tough. Consider Occam.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    2. Re:the root of the problem by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. The root of the problem here is our failed economy. All this copper theft and stuff is nothing more than symptoms of that. It's not just the crackheads or meth addicts. It's people like the two brothers who dismantled an entire bridge and hauled it off for scrap. I mean, when was the last time you saw a junkie put forth that kind of effort to get a fix?

    3. Re:the root of the problem by Genda · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the point, the society is cannibalizing itself. Sure you have folks who would pull the gold from other people teeth while they chew for drug money, but there are a lot of folks who've gotten just plain desperate for money to keep the kids in milk and Captain Crunch. As we continue to saw off support for the poor, and their numbers swell, people will resort to ever greater acts of desperation, and the price will be a chronic failure of fundamental infrastructure. Its not like we haven't seen this kind of thing happen many times before in history. Just not here (at least not since the Great Depression.)

    4. Re:the root of the problem by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. The root of the problem here is our failed economy. All this copper theft and stuff is nothing more than symptoms of that.

      Copper theft is a global problem, and has been so for long before the housing bubble burst.

      Dont pretend that America is the problem just because you want to whine about its economy.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  30. Nah go the middle east way by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0

    Chop off his hand. Although most of the people who steal wire are probably crackheads or toothless meth heads. They'd probably chop off their own hand for some more crack.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  31. Hospitals are next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in another of todays bulletins, US hospitals solve the crisis of overcrowding by locking the doors.

    Why not hire security guards to march up and down the streets all day and night carrying M5's with shoot-to-kill orders?
    Better still, surround the copper cables with high frequency electricity to shock thieves to death.
    I know, pass laws that give life imprisonment (or perhaps execution even?) for stealing copper cables!

    Or perhaps it's time to elect Ron Paul so the banking cartels can be brought down and people don't have to steal copper wire in order to feed themselves? Nah, that'd never work.

  32. Legalize Drugs... by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where I live (Vancouver, Canada) the copper is largely stolen to fund drug addiction. Legalize drugs (and give away the hard stuff under prescription) and lots of this theft goes away...

    1. Re:Legalize Drugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From someone who hung around people playing with the hard stuff. You can never get enough of it. The only limiter is price. What you propose would be akin to saying 'lets kill thousands of people and on the taxpayers dime at that'

    2. Re:Legalize Drugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Britain, heroin is available by prescription. 50% of those with a prescription are able to quit on their own, compared to the 10% not on the prescription program.

      The enforcement regime is already killing people on the peoples' dime.

    3. Re:Legalize Drugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose you aren't aware that a lot of that drug money doesn't go to things like pot. The kinds of drugs a person ends up desperate for a fix on are also the kind that can wreck a mind for good. No way to legalize that without the taxpayers ending up with the bill for all these new "legal wave" druggies who end as needy vegetables in their old age.

    4. Re:Legalize Drugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an oft-repeated canard about legalization.

      How about legalizing drugs, which will take the incentive out of much of organized crime, whilst redirecting the money that is spent on the drug war towards education and rehabilitation efforts aimed at addicts and vulnerable parts of the population?

      But nah, we gotta have our drug war... Government and police have to have their profits at the expensive of society.

    5. Re:Legalize Drugs... by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Except that the supervised drug shoots have been proven to both reduce health care costs AND to help people beat the habit when they finally get to the point where they realize it's either beat the habit or die.

      Vancouvers supervised sites more than pay for themselves just in reduced emergency room care, and when the feds tried to shut them down, the Supremes ruled that it would have been both an infringement on the provinces' right to administer their health-care programs, and an infringement on the individuals' right to security of the person by putting them at increased risk of dying.

      As someone who has never been into recreational pharmacology, I say just legalize it and deal with it - it's a social, not legal, problem. Or stop being hypocrites and ban alcohol, tobacco, and every other product proven to affect brain function, including coffee, tea, sugar, breakfast cereals, any product containing corn or corn by-products, chocolate (don't you DARE!!!) etc.

      Seriously - the war on drugs is hypocritical. It's also one that cannot ever be won. Seriously, the way to reduce drug use is to set an example, and to keep an open, non-judgmental attitude when talking to people who chose to use drugs - not have a bunch of drug-addicted politicians pass laws against it.

    6. Re:Legalize Drugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Or stop being hypocrites and ban alcohol, tobacco, and every other product proven to affect brain function, including coffee, tea, sugar, breakfast cereals, any product containing corn or corn by-products, chocolate (don't you DARE!!!) etc. ...

      The US tried that once... didn't work out so well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prohibition

    7. Re:Legalize Drugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe a jailed population is more desirable to the powers that be. They are put to work, kept out of sight, and they can't vote.

    8. Re:Legalize Drugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont understand how legalizing drugs will stop the theft. . . unless your implication is that the free market will push the price so low that someone without a job can afford keeping themselves strung out 24/7. . . in which case are we sure that we want to allow what amounts to suicide to be legal to sell AND dirt cheap?

      I mean, we arent talking about pot heads here, we are talking more along the lines of crystal meth and up.

    9. Re:Legalize Drugs... by khallow · · Score: 1

      What you propose would be akin to saying 'lets kill thousands of people and on the taxpayers dime at that'

      So how is that worse than the current state of things? At least if those drugs are cheap, then we won't have thousands of people destroying our society in order to get high.

      Also note that I don't mind at all thousands of people killing themselves with currently illegal recreational drugs. More than that already do legally.

    10. Re:Legalize Drugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So someone with no money will stop stealing for drugs just because they can get them cheaper?

      I like the way you think you almost managed to hide your own personal agenda, so are you one of those stoners or on the harder stuff?

    11. Re:Legalize Drugs... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of legal activities which can result in death or being reduced to a vegetative state...

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    12. Re:Legalize Drugs... by delinear · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that, without the war on drugs, the prisons would need to find another way to fill the cells with profit-generating cheap labour.

    13. Re:Legalize Drugs... by delinear · · Score: 1

      The problem with the current system is that drug users have no choice but to deal with criminals in order to get their fix. Those criminals have a vested interested in selling the users onto harder and more addictive substances to ensure repeat business and/or higher profits. Remove the criminal element and you might find that you negate the slippery slope somewhat - it's not like there aren't countries already trying this out with reasonably positive results.

    14. Re:Legalize Drugs... by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      In Britain, heroin is available by prescription. 50% of those with a prescription are able to quit on their own, compared to the 10% not on the prescription program.

      The enforcement regime is already killing people on the peoples' dime.

      The people on prescription are largely people who want to quit...

  33. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by c0lo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Flamebait? I was completely seriously. I don't commit crimes - those who do obviously don't want to be part of our society.

    One generation from now, being completely serious will be a capital crime in our society (you'll need a good deal of craziness to survive).

    --
    Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  34. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In case you hadn't noticed, everything is a felony these days.

    But I agree that a second conviction for theft should carry a very long sentence. Many crimes are crimes of passion, committed under circumstances that are unlikely to be repeated - and many more "crimes" are not really crimes at all - but theft has real victims and thieves have a very high recidivism rate. If there is one crime that we should punish with very long vacations from polite society, it should be theft.

  35. Fuck meth by Myopic · · Score: 1

    Meth is a fucked up drug. Stick to caffeine and weed, people.

    1. Re:Fuck meth by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I say we kill all the meth addicts. Seriously. Bullet to the head and a proper burial in a pine box. People need to *FEAR* doing drugs of this variety. Potheads and coke addicts are harmless in comparison, they do not apply. No jail time. Just execution. Same goes for the sellers too. I believe in a war on drugs, but it's been an absolute failure because we are not treating it like one. Bodies need to fall to get results!

      If you ever met a meth addict or someone doing PCP, they don't exactly want to be left alone. They start having delusions to the point of killing people. Not for the drugs or drug money. They kill because of some fucked up visions and feelings they have.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Fuck meth by shiftless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I say we kill all the meth addicts. Seriously. Bullet to the head and a proper burial in a pine box. People need to *FEAR* doing drugs of this variety

      I got a better idea. Let's kill all the tyrants who want to imprison or murder other people because they disagree with how that person lives his life. Tired of meth addicts stealing copper? If the shit was easily and readily available (like it should be, since it's ridiculously cheap and easy to produce) then this small segment of the population could continue to exist in harmony with the rest of society.

      If we're gonna start lining people up against the wall and shooting them Nazi style, then I propose we do it to the hateful, moronic, and downright IGNORANT elements in our society such as YOU. See how slippery this slope gets, and really damn fast?

    3. Re:Fuck meth by DigiShaman · · Score: 0

      I've actually been shot at by someone that's been on PCP. He thought I was but one of many demons after him. He even ran over a night jogger, stopped, and put the truck into reverse to ensure he finished him off. Double-tapped his ass with a fucking truck! So yes, I'm a tyrant when it comes to advocating offing motherfuckers like these. PCP and Meth is hardcore stuff. You know, as an American, I will always tip my hat to the Chinese. Damn, how I envy their effectiveness at dealing with drugs abusers. They put up with none of that politically correct non-sense.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:Fuck meth by hxnwix · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know, as an American, I will always tip my hat to the Chinese. Damn, how I envy their effectiveness at dealing with drugs abusers. They put up with none of that politically correct non-sense.

      What are you babbling about? The Chinese treat addiction with rehab programs, the recidivism rate for which was 80% in the 90's (Mao 1999, 151), and is documented to be over 90% in the '00s (China Daily Youth, 27/4/04). You will need access to Lexus Nexus or a similar thing to easily follow these citations, unfortunately.

      Perhaps you are thinking of their trafficking penalties. It is true that being found in possession of over a kilo of cocaine or heroin in China is often punished with the death penalty. However, stepped up enforcement efforts are met by increased prices, inducing repair to the supply chain, resulting in no long term gain. As a result, China has been investing heavily in a multifaceted program of treatment, interdiction, social welfare targeting at-risk populations, education, rehabilitation, and diplomacy seeking to convert drug growers abroad to production of legal staple crops.

      The Chinese government is already aware that they can't make significant progress solely by killing all addicts, or even just major drug traffickers - there is an unlimited supply of people who will accept any risk. Fear has become just one component of the Chinese strategy. Read up on what they're doing - in many ways, they are actually more progressive than the United States. Unlike you, they aren't entirely naïve.

    5. Re:Fuck meth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would suggest nobody is stopping you moving to China if that's how you feel. I suspect that the reason you don't want to is that there are certain freedoms you enjoy that would be taken away under that regime - in which case you have to take the rough with the smooth. I've almost lost my life several times due to other peoples' bad driving (only my quick thinking/reaction has saved me) - should we advocate shooting people who talk on phones while driving, too? Where do you draw the line in your totalitarian regime?

    6. Re:Fuck meth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be "Lexis Nexis". "Lexus Nexus" sounds like a forum for the owners of badge-engineered Toyotas.

    7. Re:Fuck meth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, meth addicts? Harmony? If you've taken enough meth for the physical dependence to kick in, I think "harmony" is out of the question.

    8. Re:Fuck meth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you two should get a room

  36. Must be well marked by pentalive · · Score: 1

    Unless it is well marked it will not prevent the thief from taking it. It will only from making as much as they thought they might. The damage to power networks and facilities will still happen.

  37. simple by spongman · · Score: 1

    drug testing at scrap yards.

  38. Squirrels Protest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in world news tonight, millions of squirrels around the globe gather in protest chanting that the use of this new technology is prohibiting them from doing what they do best, gnawing. A representative from the Communications Workers of America agrees with this stance stating that the work performed by the squirrels generate high amounts of overtime for its members. Attempts to contact AT&T, British Telecom and Telstra were not immediately responded to.

    Over to you in sports Tim...

  39. Fresno by chucklebutte · · Score: 1

    My city made it to /. SMH...

  40. Offtopic: Editing Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pervasive thefts of copper wire from under the streets of Fresno, California have prompted the city to seal thousands of its manhole covers with concrete and in Picher, Oklahoma, someone felled the town's utility poles with chain saws, allowing thieves to abscond with 3,000 feet of wire while causing a blackout as the theft of copper cables in costs US companies $60 million a year and the FBI says it considers theft of copper wire to be a threat to the nation's baseline ability to function.

    If I had an account, and karma points, I would say something constructive and civil, like "Maybe in future somebody could take it upon themselves to double-check upcoming submissions." I could also choose to say something witty: "Looks like those periods were made of copper, too! Good thing the word 'and' isn't as valuable."

    If I was feeling particularly bored, I could rewrite the offending passage myself: "'Pervasive thefts of copper wire from under the streets of Fresno, California have prompted the city to seal thousands of its manhole covers with concrete. In Picher, Oklahoma, someone felled the town's utility poles with chain saws, allowing thieves to abscond with 3,000 feet of wire while causing a blackout. The theft of copper cables in costs US companies $60 million a year, and the FBI says it considers theft of copper wire to be a threat to the nation's baseline ability to function.' FTFY"

    But I don't, so I won't; I'm an Anonymous Coward. This is three run-on sentences strung together. Fucking edit your shit.

    1. Re:Offtopic: Editing Rant by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Your use of italics is Peculiar.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  41. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't commit crime

    Really? Then you must be the ONLY person alive not to have. With so many laws on the books, it's impossible NOT to have unknowingly broken one of them, whether it's your dog mating with another dog within 1,500 feet of a public school (California) or other such stupidity.

    We had the city pass a really stupid law - because kids were holding on to the back of buses during the winter and "sledding", they passed a law making it illegal to hold on to or grasp any part of a vehicle in motion inside city limits. So how are you supposed to steer?

    Ditto with the law they passed trying to ban massage parlors by defining massage as the physical manipulation of any part of another persons body - making everything from handshakes to helping your kid blow her nose.

    It's a safe bet you've broken a few stupid laws.

  42. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by Fjandr · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Ah, more humor being sucked out of /. I'd think this would have been modded above -1 at this point.

  43. Welcome U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to the third world!

  44. Article by vencs · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thief: Let's steal copper cables!
    GSmart: Let's steel copper cables!

  45. Kill the black market by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    If you KILL the black market by removing the profit motive you make it difficult to buy the stuff on the black market.

    Making a bigger police state is foolish; some of the biggest police states have been unable to stop forbidden things besides drugs...Christianity, revolutionary talk, underground papers, guerrillas, the French resistance, banned products, ALCOHOL, violations of copyright... just to name a few.

    Cigarettes still continue under a really discriminatory tax; illegal non-taxed product is probably impossible to come bye and will be as long as the tax is not too high...

    Free government clinics where you strap in and shoot up can be quite helpful in helping these extra desperate people (not to mention they flip out in a safe place.) A huge amount of domestic violence is drug related. You can't over limit them otherwise you create an alternative market to serve them! Yet another best solution impossible in the USA because the moralist nanny state freaks insist in dictating your lifestyle.

  46. Doubt it by Frosty-B-Bad · · Score: 1

    After working in telecom, there are reasons the copper is solid. Do you know how many splices, nicks, stretches, & bends there are from a CO to a home/business? Many many more than are fixed, to put it mildly. "the company" just hopes the copper in the ground never moves around so much that is causes a disconnect.. which only really happens because it is solid copper from one end to the other, not just a skin. (when the skin is breached you would lose the higher freq required). Once copper is laid its paid for, the maintenance is the nightmare, this would just introduce an infinite more possibility of more areas that could cause problems.

    Copper thiefs cost $60 million a year.. if a company, like AT&T, took that burden alone, it would be 60 million from like 19 billion profits, which is like .003%

    I think the cable industry is more overburdened with social media experts (Hi Marketing company for a NEW cable design!) and bored reporters than meth heads actually stealing cables. (not that it doesn't happen, its just not worth researching/buying/testing/teaching people how to properly repair new cable vs industry standard = $$$$$$$$$ vs $)

  47. Simple solution by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No cash for copper. ID required and a direct deposit to a bank account.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Simple solution by quenda · · Score: 1

      No cash for copper. ID required and a direct deposit to a bank account.

      That would be too easy. Why don't they do it? Pawn shops here need ID from every seller, and must submit serial numbers of everything to the police. Its not perfect but does make a big difference.
      Then again, I have to show ID to buy some decongestant, and that seems to make no difference whatsoever to the availability of meth.
      Which probably just shows that drugs are a bad metaphor.

    2. Re:Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that this simple solution is hard to implement. Probably the first reaction of copper thieves will be to sell the copper to smugglers who will launder the scrap abroad. This is especially problematic for the Schengen countries, since most of the copper theft there is perpetrated by Eastern Europeans who have unchecked entry and exit. And think of the (expensive) bureaucracy that would need to be put in place.
      So you need to get a lot of countries to work together, and the cure might end up costing more than the disease.

    3. Re:Simple solution by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      They're already doing that here in Springfield, IL (although they still pay in cash; why need direct deposit when you have a photo ID?) and it didn't cut losses at all, it just inconvenienced people who just want to recycle aluminum cans (there are thefts of aluminum siding as well).

    4. Re:Simple solution by sco08y · · Score: 1

      No cash for copper. ID required and a direct deposit to a bank account.

      I'm sure no criminal has ever had to deal with that.

  48. A cheaper solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Use lead instead of steel. Don't incorporate it into the wire, just have a guy standing there with a semi-automatic lead dispenser, and when thieves try to steal your copper, you can lead them out.

    1. Re:A cheaper solution by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 2

      That's legal in Texas. Deadly force is permissible to defend property from vandalism or criminal mischief at night.

  49. small anecdote about really dull copper thieves by nadaou · · Score: 1

    we once had 1,500' of fiber optic cable stolen by some really dull copper thieves ... I guess they had a rather amusing trip to the scrap metal yard but, I'd wished they'd have dumped it back on the side of the road somewhere as due to our fubared funding situation at the time it was years before that system was operational again (until the gear was completely obsolete and had to be entirely replaced anyway).

    --
    ~.~
    I'm a peripheral visionary.
  50. Are your numbers right? by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    $10 bucks doesn't sound worth the effort and risk. If your numbers are right and they really only get $10 bucks for the cable, then that speaks to a frightening level of desperation on a part of your populace. Maybe instead of making cables harder to steal we should make citizens that don't want to steal them...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Are your numbers right? by Relayman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They just need enough money to buy a rock of crack. Tomorrow is another theft for another rock.

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    2. Re:Are your numbers right? by TheLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe instead of making cables harder to steal we should make citizens that don't want to steal them...

      At a certain point having a "welfare state" might become cheaper overall. Then most of them won't bother to steal if you provide them with food, shelter and tv/"youtube"/game consoles/parks.

      Not a big difference if you're going to put those you catch in prisons where they are fed and housed...

      Of course you'd also need to fix the education side to it, compulsory education for kids, free education (maybe even up to undergraduate level), free meals for school-kids. That way you don't get stuck with 20% or more of your population being under-educated and not very competitive with the rest of the world in terms of cost/ability.

      --
    3. Re:Are your numbers right? by spokenoise · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wish I had mod points. Pity the social policy says you're shit unless you can pay for your health and education. A healthy and educated population wouldn't need to steal $10 worth of copper. Side effect from screwing the population.

    4. Re:Are your numbers right? by sFurbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At a certain point having a "welfare state" might become cheaper overall. Then most of them won't bother to steal if you provide them with food, shelter and tv/"youtube"/game consoles/parks.

      I'm not sure that works as well as you would imagine. Theft is still a problem in Denmark, where we do have a welfare state (of course, one should really do a comparison of Northern European countries, and try to correlate the degree of welfare state to the crime rate, but even there, ause and effect might be hard to tell apart). It seems to be mostly drug addicts and Eastern European gangs doing the theft.

      Of course, if we are talking about the price of a welfare state, be sure to include the lesser amount of work hours being produced. Higher taxes means less incentive to work, and higher social benefits means lesser incentive to work. Even though people are not only economic creatures, that reduced incentive does have an effect on the amount of work people are willing to do.

    5. Re:Are your numbers right? by TheLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2620558&cid=38698508

      That said, perhaps they should also do a test of the teachers, perhaps the direct reason for the difference is Finland has better teachers ;).

      BUT even so Finland might have better teachers because the teachers were once students themselves, and if most of the students were well-educated, then most of the teachers would be too...

      Whereas if you have crappy students each generation and most teachers coming from the "crappier end" of very unevenly educated students, you're not going to get very good results.

      In a democracy if you leave too many people "behind", unless you're at the very top, you're still eventually going to pay for it one way or another, as long as those behind can still vote ;).

      --
    6. Re:Are your numbers right? by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Or it doesn't matter. Opportunistic thieves come from all classes.

      I believe that many of the people involved in this kind of theft are drug users of the heavier variety. You'd do more to cut down on this problem by allowing pharmacies to administer a patient's drug of choice at market prices, as opposed to street prices. Just a hypothesis, anyway.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    7. Re:Are your numbers right? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      While that's true, countries like Denmark might have a smoother "upgrade path" if more and more jobs end up being more efficiently done by machines.

      People that say that there will always be jobs for humans are delusional, the whole point of things like "industrial automation" is to reduce the total number of humans needed for the work. Artificially creating jobs would be the same as welfare.

      With a welfare state you could end up having 90% (or more?) of the population on welfare, while the machines are the slaves.

      With a full free-market capitalist state, you may eventually end up having a small percentage of rich people, the larger percentage being some "tech priests", "chosen worshippers" and the rest being a mix of human and machine slaves.

      Even though people are not only economic creatures, that reduced incentive does have an effect on the amount of work people are willing to do.

      And why should people still have to work if one day machines can do it better? Just so the rich and powerful can feel superior?

      --
    8. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe instead of making cables harder to steal we should make citizens that don't want to steal them...

      At a certain point having a "welfare state" might become cheaper overall.

      Perhaps he was thinking more of genetic engineering - or at least pavlovian conditioning as part of the school conditioning. You can't afford not to do it - think of the children.

    9. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forget something. prison is a private enterprise that EARNED every $10 it gets for a meal fed to a prisoner. what did the thief do to earn food and housing?

    10. Re:Are your numbers right? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Of course you'd also need to fix the education side to it, compulsory education for kids, free education (maybe even up to undergraduate level), free meals for school-kids. That way you don't get stuck with 20% or more of your population being under-educated and not very competitive with the rest of the world in terms of cost/ability."

      The Free Market will fix this!

      Oh.....wait.....

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    11. Re:Are your numbers right? by Bert64 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Under a capitalist state each individual company is out to increase its own profits without giving any regard to the population, environment or economy as a whole...
      As a result, each company individually tries to reduce its costs by reducing the number of human workers required.
      Eventually you end up with mass unemployment, and in the absense of a welfare state those people have no choice but to turn to crime or die.
      The companies also shoot themselves in the foot because with everyone being unemployed, there is no longer anyone who can afford to buy their products.
      Of course, under capitalism people may well know this, but capitalism discourages working for the common good and anyone who tries to do so is likely to be driven out of business by those who are more ruthless.

      Without checks and balances, capitalism is doomed to self destruct.

      And why should people still have to work if one day machines can do it better? Just so the rich and powerful can feel superior?

      Because under a capitalist system, someone who isn't working wont make any money... Giving out money to people who haven't worked to earn it is welfare.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    12. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe instead of making cables harder to steal we should make citizens that don't want to steal them...

      At a certain point having a "welfare state" might become cheaper overall. Then most of them won't bother to steal if you provide them with food, shelter and tv/"youtube"/game consoles/parks.

      No, please don't go down the UK route. They will cash their benefits cheque *and* nick the cables for extra money on top too.

    13. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you do realize most copper thefts are carried out by people addicted to meth and not I need to feed my kids type problems*. Basically, If you give these people more social services they would use them to get more meth.

      * Just google "Copper Theft Meth".

    14. Re:Are your numbers right? by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      This is normal for the USA. WE are currently riding 25% unemployment and most of the republican assholes have done away with any kind of poor assistance in many states as well as the federal level.

      So you have 1/4 of the population having to scrounge to survive. Lawlessness breeds in that environment.

      Yes they are reporting "9%" unemployment, but that is their new way of counting them. Anyone that has been unemployed for more than 6 months is NOT COUNTED.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    15. Re:Are your numbers right? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "Or it doesn't matter. Opportunistic thieves come from all classes."

      Yup, I knew of a Director at a previous job that would steal reams of paper from work to take home for his kids to use.

      You can make 6 figures and still be a dirty thief.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The welfare state has created this. Unfortunately, the ratcheting back recently won't have an affect for 2 generations, at least. Also, not that the kids doing this all grew up on WIC, which mostly survived the great assault on welfare. A social safety net is important, but when it became a cradle for immoral behavior, we fucked ourselves.

    17. Re:Are your numbers right? by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      Copper was just up around $4.50/lb scrapping value here not too long ago, though I've been told a new copper mine/plant came online recently pushing the scrap value down quite a bit

    18. Re:Are your numbers right? by smpoole7 · · Score: 1

      > Opportunistic thieves come from all classes.

      True story, told to me by the deputies when they investigated our incident:

      Guy works for a trucking company. He drives his tractor onto the lot, waves at his buddies and says, "hey, Ralph!" Good mornin', Sam!" He hooks up a giant aluminum flatbed and drives it to his house. He uses a torch to cut it into scrap which he transports up into Tennessee. He makes thousands of dollars.

      Here's the scary part: he probably would have gotten away with it. But he did it THREE TIMES. He was finally caught when they did inventory, wondered about three missing trailers, and old security video showed him driving off with one of them.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    19. Re:Are your numbers right? by swalve · · Score: 1

      It's not desperation, I don't think, as much as it is an "easy" way to make money. Why go to a job when you can make just as much for fewer hours of work? Copper gets you $3 a pound, I believe. Fill up your trunk once a week, and you aren't doing too badly. That shit weighs a lot- go to the home center and try to pick up a coil of 2 or 4 gauge wire.

    20. Re:Are your numbers right? by smpoole7 · · Score: 1

      > At a certain point having a "welfare state" might become cheaper overall.

      Then how come all of those kids -- well-dressed, well looked after by the state, with free health care, and told from childhood that they're "just as good and just as important" as anyone else -- rioted in France and England? Why the image on London television of the teens cheering as they destroy shops and homes?

      Just asking.

      (What you're saying sounds good in theory, and I know that's being taught aggressively in sociology classes nowadays, but those of us who live in the real world, dealing with real people, know that it ain't quite that simple ...)

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    21. Re:Are your numbers right? by swalve · · Score: 1

      You know, I always hear that higher taxes mean a lower incentive to work, and I'm not sure I believe it. More money is more money. If I need $1000, I'm going to keep working until I get $1000. Maybe I'm more (or less?) rational than the crowd.

    22. Re:Are your numbers right? by smpoole7 · · Score: 1

      The economy here in Birmingham isn't that bad, because our primary employer is healthcare and the service industry.

      We still have tons and tons of copper and aluminum theft. When the thieves are caught, most of them are NOT crack heads, and they're not from lower-income families. Some of them are guys with regular jobs during the day. They do it to make extra money, because the scrap yards look the other way when they bring in the metal, and because they enjoy it.

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    23. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10 bucks doesn't sound worth the effort and risk. If your numbers are right and they really only get $10 bucks for the cable...

      Why do you keep saying "ten dollars bucks"?

    24. Re:Are your numbers right? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      There isn't a set amount of money people need, but there is diminishing returns on money. That makes your argument plausible, it might be that (some) people would work less if the tax rate was lowered. The consensus among economists (backed up by research, of course) is that, at least at the tax rate Denmark has (highest marginal tax is 56%, a lot of people are at that level), lowering the taxes will result in people working more, on average.

    25. Re:Are your numbers right? by swalve · · Score: 1

      Incorrect, as far as I can tell. The labor force participation rate is going down, but not because of any changes in methodology. U3 only means what it purports to mean, which is the number of people who want work, and are still actively looking for work.

    26. Re:Are your numbers right? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Do not think I believe that crime will magically go away just because of education[1] and welfare.

      And there were other youth too:
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2024035/UK-riots-2011-500-Londoners-offer-help-clean-rioters-mess.html
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2024446/UK-riots-2011-Broom-armies-reclaim-London-Birmingham-Manchester-streets.html

      So a judge of how well a system works is how much good you get vs how much bad, compared to other systems.

      [1] I personally think the UK education system failed at domesticating humans. Humans are pack animals like dogs. But less predictable due to less organized breeding programmes ;). Seriously though, most humans feel a need to belong to some group/tribe. In the old days, bad or good, there was stuff like religion, guilds, class systems. Nowadays religion etc is out-of-fashion, so there's stuff like football, street-gangs, Cult of Apple and the occasional pack of rioters. And within each group, the members will just do whatever the rest are doing or if a strong leader is present, they'll do whatever the leader tells them to do.

      So I suggest that if you give the youth a less destructive "tribe"/"gang" to belong to, with interesting activities that give them a sense of purpose and a "place", it'll help keep more of them out of trouble for at least a number of years, till they find something else (or not).

      --
    27. Re:Are your numbers right? by stewbee · · Score: 1

      I was with you until you said, in effect, that our teachers are uneducated. In every public school that I have heard of in the US, you still need at least a bachelor's degree. Now while I was in college I did take a senior level complex analysis class that was filled mostly with math/education majors, and while I couldn't help but chuckle at listening to them whine about how hard the teacher's tests were*, they were at least able to finish college and that alone makes them a step above most people in the US.

      This not to say that we can't do better. Take me for example. I would have no problems teaching. I enjoy it. While in undergrad I was a teachers assistant for calc 2 and I liked it. Another bonus to being a teacher in the US is that you do get a nice vacation in the summer, ideally. However there are a few good reasons not to be a teacher in the US.

      1. Pay: In general, pay is not as good as I can make in the private sector. Granted, in the Chicago suburbs, teacher pay is on par with what I make, but from what I can tell that is the exception and not the rule
      2. Dealing with parents: Parents don't want to hear that their child is just average or worse. So you can just take the easy route and not deal with it by giving decent grades.
      3. School administrators: I have a friend who's wife was a music teacher in one of the local school districts. He would tell me horror stories about the superintendent that his wife worked for. If he didn't like you or if you upset him in some fashion, he would have no problems removing you from your position.
      4. No respect from community: Typically, us normal 9-5 working stiffs see teachers as having the good life. I mean after all, they have summers off! Because of this, it makes them easy targets for budget cuts. Now the teachers around here unionized, but one just needs to look at Wisconsin in the past year to see what some people think about unions. Some people see it as a shelter to hide incompetent workers, but I see it as a protection from knee jerk reactions of the people, school administrators, and legislative bodies.

      I am sure there are more reasons, but these are the few that come to mind. In practice though, I think that I would be a good candidate for teaching. I am passionate about math and science. I have been told that I explained things very well when I was a TA. I would also like to think that having some real world experience would help to enlighten kids as to how and why math is useful, assuming I become a math teacher. Or similarly if I became a physics teacher.

      *I had just finished my undergrad EE degree and was in grad school at the time, so this senior level course was pretty easy comparatively to most of the other classes that I had taken previously

    28. Re:Are your numbers right? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      At a certain point having a "welfare state" might become cheaper overall. Then most of them won't bother to steal if you provide them with food, shelter and tv/"youtube"/game consoles/parks.

      You really think that? I think it would perhaps eliminate a small minority of thieves who really are stealing out of desperation and feel guilt over it. Those people would stop. The vast majority though are doing it because they feel entitled. They get food stamps, for instance but they also want drugs, beer, video games etc. Everyone wants what they haven't got.

      Unless you are going to 'equalize' everybody you will always have envy and by extension theft. We know from experience all over the world what happens when you try to 'equalize' everyone, it aint pretty.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    29. Re:Are your numbers right? by khallow · · Score: 1

      At a certain point having a "welfare state" might become cheaper overall.

      In my view, the welfare state is a large part of the cause of the problem. In the US, I'd say that the educational system has gone seriously downhill due to the same ideologies that believe in the welfare state. Housing and child care policies of similar nature have contributed by creating environments ripe for criminal activity.

      There's no point to compulsory, free education, for example, if it's not worth the price even at "free" and the alternatives, such as uneducated children working in an exploitive sweat shop, are better. At least in the latter case, the kids are getting paid.

      A big part of the problem also is lack of enforcement of law. It turns out that stealing copper wire is illegal in the US and the people doing it often are really dumb. But there's too many people in prison for all sorts of reasons. There's a very straightforward correlation between lack of punishment and repeat offenders. Among other things, this means an end to the so-called "War on Drugs".

    30. Re:Are your numbers right? by swalve · · Score: 1

      Is the research on average hours worked per capita, or something more opinion-based like surveys? Because I imagine most people would say they would work more if only taxes weren't so high, but do they actually do it when a tax gets lowered?

    31. Re:Are your numbers right? by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "A healthy and educated population wouldn't need to steal $10 worth of copper."

      Sorry, but that's a very shallow idealization of the cause of theft. And, looking at the world at large and history, it doesn't hold water.

      We currently live in the healthiest and best educated society to have existed (despite picayune quibbles) - and still - assholes steal copper to avoid legitimate work.

    32. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About 4% of the population are sociopaths, and a good chunk of those are slackers. Nothing you do will make them want to work - so putting them where they can't cause much harm is a good idea. Not sure if education will help there if they truly want a free ride.

      Oh, and the prison population tests out at 25% sociopathic.

    33. Re:Are your numbers right? by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      Education has been shown to be vastly overrated, especially with a popular culture that makes it clear that only nerds get good grades or pay attention to the superannuated teacher.

      The end result is we have a hip-hop rap-listening, crime-worshipping culture that has decided education is irrelevant. And for these folks, it probably is. We have finally entered a point where there are a lot more people than jobs, so the people without jobs aren't going to be needed. Ever. The labor market is sufficiently automated that what took 10 people to do 50 years ago now takes one. And the factory that employed 10,000 workers closed and moved to China. The US simply doesn't need all the people working any longer.

      Now, the tax base the government has been running on has pretty much collapsed because of this. The government isn't bringing in the revenue from those millions of laid-off workers and it shows. There isn't the money to provide a nice comfy lifestyle for those millions of workers. It is unclear how this will be resolved, but it is clear they aren't going to be supported by the government the way things are today. A massive reduction in the US population - perhaps by disease or violent revolution - is probably where things are headed. We don't need all those people anymore, so someone will figure out a way to get rid of them.

      Sadly, violent revolution seems to be the least likely. Nobody since around 1970 has actually taken the concept of violent revolution seriously. And Patty Hearst wasn't a role model for anyone.

    34. Re:Are your numbers right? by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Most people in modern economies are on salaries with fixed hours and thus have little incentive to work more anyway. Productivity is more strongly influenced by surrounding factors in the work environment. In fact, shorter working hours often means a higher productivity for the hours in which work is done. The minority of people who do have flexible incomes - contractors and the self-employed - have just as much incentive to work as they did before.

    35. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under a capitalist state each individual company is out to increase its own profits without giving any regard to the population, environment or economy as a whole...
      As a result, each company individually tries to reduce its costs by reducing the number of human workers required.
      Eventually you end up with mass unemployment...

      Here's where you go wrong. Every company tries to become more efficient, by doing the same work with less people. Then other companies start up, doing new things, employing the newly out-of-work people.

      Just compare society today with the days of subsistence agriculture. The number of workers required to grow enough food for our population is tiny - but that doesn't mean that everyone else is unemployed.

    36. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Because under a capitalist system, someone who isn't working wont make any money... Giving out money to people who haven't worked to earn it is welfare.

      not really, there are two ways to make money in capitalism, working is only one of them. the other is capital gains. there are plenty of very very rich people who don't work.

    37. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      compulsory education for kids - check

      free education - check

      20% or more of your population being under-educated - check

      which results in more bernie mad off with your copper futures types. - checkmate!

    38. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those companies will only survive if they do new things for those still with money.

      If gradually most of the money/capital/assets/resources ends up in the hands of a few, it'll all be about what these want.

      If the roads, farms, factories, waterways, utilities, "Intellectual Property", "security forces" are all owned by a few rich people/corporations, you'd have no choice but to kiss their ass.

      They'd be very happy in the absence of a pesky elected government (that has to pretend to please the voters), because then they'd be the government, except they won't ever get voted out.

    39. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At a certain point having a "welfare state" might become cheaper overall. Then most of them won't bother to steal if you provide them with food, shelter and tv/"youtube"/game consoles/parks.

      Welfare has a tenancy to produce an increasing quantity of human refuse through passing down uselessness generationally.

      PROOF:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV8P-vib5n8&feature=related
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfGLB8LO1aM
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1384498/Caught-camera--Swarm-mob-laugh-joke-steal-beer-soda-snacks-Las-Vegas-convenience-store.html
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gKrp81SINkc&feature=related

      SOLUTION:
      Toss them on the street and if they want to, or are able to, work they can be picked up from their bootstraps. If the economy goes into the !@$!@$!@#itter, having a large number of people around with nothing to lose can incite a solution to that.

    40. Re:Are your numbers right? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      Economists are well avare of the problems with survey-based research.* The research is based on actual behaviour. The example I am best aware of was done a few years ago after Sweden reformed their tax system: because the system change was extremely complex, the change in people's marginal tax varied enough that you could compare how the change affected people's work-hours. It turned out that a lower marginal tax did indeed mean more workhours. This is not the only such investigation, and they do show different results (IIRC, one done in Britain showed close to no correlation). I am in no way qualified to asses the literature, so I will go with the consensus of the experts: With the situation in Denmark, a lower marginal tax will expand the work supply. I don't know what the consensus is on other countries.

      *I would imagine a survey would slant the other way, that people would be less inclined to answer that they would work more for more money, but that probably shows the difference between our cultures (assuming you are not from Denmark).

    41. Re:Are your numbers right? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      Most people in modern economies are on salaries with fixed hours and thus have little incentive to work more anyway.

      Quite a lot of people are working part time, if the economic incentive to go to full time (or just more hours) was higher, some of them would probably do so. Besides, if the tax was lowered, the unions might agree to a longer work-week (or not press as hard for a shorter work-week), as their members would get more of the extra money.

      Productivity is more strongly influenced by surrounding factors in the work environment. In fact, shorter working hours often means a higher productivity for the hours in which work is done.

      Indeed, but I am not sure that higher average productivity will follow from a shorter work-week: People are perfectly capable of being ineffective even in a shorter work-week. I think this has more to do with management than anything else.

      The minority of people who do have flexible incomes - contractors and the self-employed - have just as much incentive to work as they did before.

      How do they have the same incentive to work if their effective hourly wage goes down?

    42. Re:Are your numbers right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And from the population screwing! These people need to be sterilized.

    43. Re:Are your numbers right? by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Quite a lot of people are working part time, if the economic incentive to go to full time (or just more hours) was higher, some of them would probably do so.

      Part-time employees as well as their employers are usually more interested in the flexibility such contracts provide. The idea that part-time jobs could, or even should be upgraded to full-time positions is misguided. With empty contract books such a policy would just be a huge waste of productivity.

      Besides, if the tax was lowered, the unions might agree to a longer work-week (or not press as hard for a shorter work-week), as their members would get more of the extra money.

      Possibly, but that doesn't mean it will lead to higher growth or productivity. The working hours of unionized workers is an issue when there's a shortage of workers that's putting a cap on growth. Currently quite the opposite is the case in many parts of the world. A higher workload for some would lead to lay-offs for other workers, who will then be unable to buy consumer products, leading to less contracts for their previous employers.

      How do they have the same incentive to work if their effective hourly wage goes down?

      Because it's terribly flawed to model incentive to work by the fraction of income that's taxed. The amount that is kept still scales linearly with production. It's more of a psychological effect if anything. In reality most self-employed people are borderline workaholics, and certainly not likely to be holding the economy back.

  51. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by tbird81 · · Score: 0

    Is theft of copper cabling "stupid law"? If not, you've missed the point.

  52. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm pretty sure their are jurisdictions were publishing something anonymously is illegal.

    For example your post annoyed me and:
    """
    Whoever - ...

    makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device, whether or not conversation or communication ensues, without disclosing his identity and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the called number or who receives the communications; ...

    shall be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.
    """ 47 U.S.C. Â 223(a)(1)(C)

    Now sure "intent to annoy" means something entirely different - but do you really know every single law that applies to you in enough detail to know you have never broken one?

  53. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    "i don't commit crime" does not restrict the crime to the stealing of copper cable, which should be obvious.

  54. Legal drugs still cost money by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    And they are still addictive. There's arguments to legalize drugs. This isn't one of them. In fact, you'll discover that some of the addicts that do this are alcoholics, their drug of choice is perfectly legal.

    When you combine a messed up mental state with a desire for money to pay for the addiction, you'll get people doing stupid shit. Legalization won't change that. It isn't as though someone doing legal drugs will suddenly be clear of mind and a productive member of society.

    Now don't misunderstand this as me arguing against legalization overall, I'm just saying it won't help this problem.

    1. Re:Legal drugs still cost money by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Could help if legal distribution reduced the price. Drug addicts currently need to come up with more money than even a middle-class income could provide. Though I guess a heroin or meth addict is incapable of even working McDonald's if that would be enough to support their habit...

    2. Re:Legal drugs still cost money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong. legalization reduces the social stigma of drug addiction. Presently, addicts are about 15 times more likely to independently seek help for alcoholism than addiction to illicit drugs. (Court mandated is about the same, adjusting for prevalence) Furthermore, it will free a vast amount of resources to support rehabilitation instead of incarceration. It is about 4x more expensive to incarcerate someone for a year than in-patient rehab (20x for outpatient) (double these figures because 6mo programs are generally very effective and this does not even include the law enforcement side (e.g. drug task forces, dea, etc). posting anon due to line of work. It is undisputed that we are more effective than prison in transitioning people away from a life involving hard drugs and alcohol. Then there's the cost efficiency. We treat between 4 and 40 addicts every year for the cost of incarcerating a single person the state prison.

    3. Re:Legal drugs still cost money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Wikipedia 1 Kg of raw opium, which (cheaply) refines to 100g of heroin - at least 6 months worth of use, is USD $29 on the legal market. I assume amphetamines are even cheaper to produce. Granted, the US Pharmacological-Industrial Complex won't be selling this stuff at cost..

  55. Cause, or symptom? by shiftless · · Score: 1, Insightful

    'Despite efforts like these, thieves continue to steal copper because of its rising value.

    Are you really sure that's the root cause of this?

    1. Re:Cause, or symptom? by jmottram08 · · Score: 1

      I dont understand your implication. Are you suggesting that people dont steal copper because of its current value?

    2. Re:Cause, or symptom? by fleeped · · Score: 1

      'Despite efforts like these, people continue to be poor and resort to stealing'
      There, FTFHim

    3. Re:Cause, or symptom? by couchslug · · Score: 2

      The root cause is the War On Some Drugs, but copper is expensive and WELL worth legally collecting and scrapping.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Cause, or symptom? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      I believe that he's implying that the cost is going up because of increased demand due to all the thefts.

    5. Re:Cause, or symptom? by jmottram08 · · Score: 1

      .... that makes little to no sense at all. Increased demand would be largely met by increased supply from the scrap yards. Its not like these people, or the people they are selling to are destroying the copper.

    6. Re:Cause, or symptom? by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Close. The root cause is the economy, and the root cause of that is corruption in government and in our banking system. Yes, it trickles down. The War on Drugs of course plays a huge role as well, but the brothers who dismantled an entire bridge in Pennsylvania to sell for scrap weren't doing it to buy drugs.

  56. I'm surprised at all the "this won't work" posts by doug141 · · Score: 1

    Of course the cable maker will clearly mark the cable, so it'll work. Copper thieves aren't first-timers, and they'll learn about this new cable real fast.

  57. Part of a growing Growing Trend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stealing metals for scrap value.

    You've also got this huge trend of stealing Catalytic Converters from high sitting Toyota vehicles. My neighbor had his catalytic converter stolen twice, and at $2000 a pop, that's one expensive growing trend.

  58. South Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I thought things were bad here in South Africa. The American copper thieves are making our guys look like amateurs :).

    But it is a serious problem here. People going without landlines for weeks or months. Telkom replaces the lines only to have them stolen again in a short period.

    We should have National Key Infrastructure (not the National Key Point) laws. If you do any damage to water, electricity, transport or communications (including postal services), you get a minimum mandatory sentence (3 years sounds about right), after which more years get added depending on how naughty you were.

  59. Infrastructure theft = looters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    crime against humanity, shoot on sight.

    1. Re:Infrastructure theft = looters by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      Posting flamebait on /. crime against humanity, shoot on sight.

  60. BPA in the Northwest has starting using clad steel by AbrasiveCat · · Score: 1

    The Bonneville Power Administration in the northwest US has already started using copper clad steel wire (cable) for grounding purposes. I haven't heard if it is reducing theft yet. BPA hopes it reduces theft so it reduces safety risk of missing power grounds at substations.

  61. What's New? by Vijaysj · · Score: 5, Informative

    Transmission lines in the national electricity grid here (India) consist of steel core for strength with an outer aluminum layer for conductivity. This solution has been in place from the time electrification started in India.

    --
    To Share Is To care
    1. Re:What's New? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Aluminum also has the property that its oxide is harder than the metal itself. An oxide layer forms spontaneously, and due to its hardness, protects the cable from further weathering. Steel or copper cables would have to be coated in some sort of insulation.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  62. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can tell that you have certainly missed the point tbird81, or are you ignoring it because it's inconvenient?
    Not that it matters, you've already told us all what to think of your opinions.

  63. This. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I guess the fact that our landlady likes to go out and there and shoot with her boyfriend gives them pause. The sight of all those targets with bullet holes all around the center makes them think twice. :)"

    Extend the right to defend your proporty: A thief who ignores "no trespassing" signs and breaks into a clearly private area should be viewed as having has given up his right to safety. The law should allow security systems that do bodily harm, problem solved.

    1. Re:This. by shentino · · Score: 1

      Considering that many thieves use the illegality of deadly force as justification to

      When thieves can brazenly say "nya nya nya u can't touch me unless you catch me and I'll only go to jail for awhile so nyaaa" things need to change.

    2. Re:This. by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      A thief who ignores "no trespassing" signs and breaks into a clearly private area should be viewed as having has given up his right to safety. The law should allow security systems that do bodily harm, problem solved.

      I'm sure you'll be happy to go to jail after your automated security system causes bodily harm to someone who accidentally ventures onto your property without seeing the no-tresspassing sign (maybe because they didn't go via the main entrance, or maybe they were blind or don't read English?), or people like the post man, firemen, police, etc. who may well have legitimate business (that is beneficial to you) on your property.

    3. Re:This. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Texas Penal Code 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY.
      A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
      (1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
      (2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
      (A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
      (B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
      (3) he reasonably believes that:
      (A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
      (B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.

      In Texas, you shoot them in the back as they run away. Or shoot them without warning if you think they may be intending to commit theft at night. Gotta love Texas.

  64. Same thing in the US by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Same reason too (strength and cost). When you are talking shorter run, like in a house, where weight doesn't matter and voltage is low you go copper. The lower resistance is well worth it. However for the long haul runs aluminium wins the day, and steel at the core to strengthen it. The higher impedance does lead to a bit more loss, but then you are talking as much as half a million volts so that equalizes things a bit.

    1. Re:Same thing in the US by flonker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Another reason copper is used, is that copper oxidizes much less. Which is why you have special connectors for aluminum wire, and for most modern building wiring, aluminum is forbidden. (Super-simplified version)

    2. Re:Same thing in the US by Zorpheus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually the resitance per weight is lower for aluminium than for copper. You could go for aluminium instead of copper and get less resitance by using thicker wires, and the wires would still be lighter.

    3. Re:Same thing in the US by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      But Aluminum forms a better protective layer when it oxidizes, and in typical applications you can solve the corrosion problem at the contacts either with dielectric grease or with conductive epoxy and a copper pigtail, which is how you solve the problem with existing aluminum wire -- add these pigtails at literally every splice, outlet, and switch.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Same thing in the US by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      I think it is instead galvanic problems with copper (and perhaps brass) wherever the two are adjacent. It's not straight oxidation (perhaps this is what you meant by super-simplified).

    5. Re:Same thing in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even though Aluminum oxidizes extremely quickly, corrosion resistance is excellent due to the formation of a thin surface layer of aluminium oxide that forms when the metal is exposed to air (effectively preventing further oxidation )

      Copper is similarly reactive in nature so it is hard to say copper is "much" less reactive than aluminum, however the formation of oxides of copper also help to improve corrosion resistance of copper.

      The reason there are "special" connectors for aluminum wire is to prevent a REDOX (reduction-oxidation) reaction if you are connecting copper to aluminum since directly connecting copper to aluminum will create a "galvanic" reaction and aluminum will corrode prematurely, and previously tight electrical connections can become loose over time leading to poor electrical connections which generate heat and contribute to arcing and possibly house-fires in severe situations.

    6. Re:Same thing in the US by afidel · · Score: 1

      Aluminum is quite common all the way up to the breaker box, I know the few boxes I've worked on all had aluminum service lines.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Same thing in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copper is a better conductor per cross sectional area and aluminum is better per weight. So, what you use depends on constraints. If space, thickness, and probably turning radius are most important like in home wiring, copper is the way to go. If weight is the primary factor you go with larger gauge aluminum because even though it is thicker it is lighter than copper.

    8. Re:Same thing in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the forbidden part is due to the thermal expansion of aluminium. Aluminum self oxidizes, forming Aluminum Oxide coating. It's why it doesn't corrode. Break the oxidization, and more will form.

      The copper/aluminum expansion often created contact issues resulting in arcing, heat, and house fires. Special paste is required for retrofitting connections, but many houses with pre-existing aluminum wiring are still safe (torque specs followed, etc.). Obviously, industrial installations still use it.

  65. Okaaaay... by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

    Copper clad steel wire has been around for decades. This is new how?

    --
    Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
  66. Too lazy to read it all. Did anyone mention . . . by Greg+Merchan · · Score: 1

    . . . the sacking of Rome?

  67. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by webnut77 · · Score: 2

    Something like 70% of copper thieves have been convicted of theft once before. If there was a death penalty for thieves - and really, why not for all felonies? - this problem would quickly end.

    Good idea. That would stop the file sharing problem, too!

  68. Sooo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Unlike conventional cables made from solid copper, the GroundSmart Copper Clad Steel Cable consists of a steel core bonded to a copper outer casing"

    Coppering steel replaces stealing copper?

  69. Re:I'm surprised at all the "this won't work" post by jmottram08 · · Score: 1

    When they chop down poles to read the print on the cable its a bit late, AND companies arent going to rush out and rewire everything with all new (and more expensive cable) just so they can still have their poles cut.

    I mean, i hear you, this is a long term solution, but all the "it isnt going to work" is based on the fact that few if any companies will jump on this bandwagon, especially when they know that when the economy improves theft will go down anyway.

  70. Where's the good news? by romanm · · Score: 1

    So they invented some non-recyclable material which is supposed to replace the recyclable one? How is this good?

  71. This is more looking like China during the 90's by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    Cables that are cut.

    Roads that have the manhole cover removed.

    Garbage can that has its cover stolen.

    Street signs that needs to be constantly replaced.

    Fire hoses with the chain and cover removed.

  72. thought this was a german only problem atm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are ripping down power lines from train rails while they are online....... (and sadly they know how to ground so they can remove them safely)

  73. What a load of drivel by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then why do north european countries with socialized healthcare and education AND social security still get hit by copper thieves?

    There are always people who want still more. Claim social security and go out stealing copper to get more money. Or do you think thieves are such noble people they don't claim social security because they got another source of income?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:What a load of drivel by emilv · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Maybe because "we" north European countries are part of the European union which makes it easy for people to travel between poor and rich countries.

      Note that I don't think it's the poor peoples fault. There's obviously some sort of organised crime utilising poor people for their own gains and this is made easier just because of the ease of travel, but that same ease of travel is a big win for other parts of society, and it's also fair to not bind people to the geographic region they happend to be born in. I'm sure americans have similar problems.

    2. Re:What a load of drivel by sosume · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Because we have open borders. People from former eastbloc states, who do not have any social welfare, come in and steal the copper. This must look like a harsh statement but the statistics do not lie; 90% of copper theft in Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium is performed by people from Poland, Romania, Bulgaria etc. (I know, missing reference)

    3. Re:What a load of drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because there's no 100% solution. The difference is the result the same or worse or better? And is it worth it compared to the cost?

      With the welfare state, you're counting on more people being too lazy to go do the crime. Of course you might get more bored+greedy people that gangs would happily recruit (so that those at the top of the gangs become rich :) ).

    4. Re:What a load of drivel by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      You guys should build a wall...

      Oh wait, that did not turn out so well last time.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:What a load of drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, but that's obviously false. It's normal for people to *think* that for all sorts of psycho- and socio- logical reasons, but the more painful truth is that the amount of copper theft that comes cross-border is nowhere near 90%. You do have thieves among you :P

    6. Re:What a load of drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't get hit anywhere as badly as US in Latvia and I pressume situation is even better in Sweden or Finland. We have rednecks but since they depend on mobile towers and electricity themselves they are generally not very inclined to make their lives even worse.

    7. Re:What a load of drivel by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Because the bloody Polish "boarder roamers" are still earing crap. Instead of national robbers we have east european robbers who roam the countries looking for cash.
      And why is that? Because you don't earn any money back in their countries. So its usually never the locals.

    8. Re:What a load of drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, missing reference. Racists are not bothered by a little lie here and there.

  74. Zap! by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    People obviously become copper thieves because they're too stupid for anything else...

    Whenever you see rail electricians working on the overhead line, they ground it to the rails. But copper thieves are not that smart so they pull it down and it hits the ground sparking, then stops. The thieves - thinking it's shorted out - proceed to cut it... ZAP!! - The system is designed to cut the power in case of shorts (happens all the time with trees hitting the wires in the wind etc.) and then turn the power on a few seconds later if the short is no longer detected. That's why the workers always ground it. The power is turned off but even if turned on by accident it will short out and stay off.

    Some stupid thieves got fried here recently. Not only didn't they know about grounding, they also decided to steal a stretch with a feed in the middle... So not only was a cut in either end not enough to render the piece harmless but the thief at either end got fried despite most likely seeing the powerful flash down the line from his partner going first... 16.000 volts with a lot of amps makes for an impressive flash and zero chance at finding much to bury...

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    1. Re:Zap! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      A college pal of mine used to work for an electric company, he said that sometimes they'd go out to investigate a fault and they'd find a hole, a partly cut cable and blobs of a black tarry substance.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  75. Replacing copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In Denmark, we has has lots of train disruptions due to stolen cables. So the danish railways has already started using the the copperclad cables with very low copper content.

    But that does not prevent criminals from Eastern Europe to go for the old cables. It is not drug addicts, it is organized criminals that steals the cables, despite the penalty being relatively harsh (many years in a prison under living conditions way better than they could dream of back home in Romania, Bulgaria or wherever they come from).

  76. Copper coated steel cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steel adds strength to cables with AC on them and a layer of copper on the outside is for good conductivity since thats were the current is.
    First time I've heard of that being done to foil thieves. On a big cable its also cheaper to have a steel core than to make it from solid copper.

  77. Cops catch copper conmen, than what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think thieves who steal more than the value of a chicken shall lose a hand. At least that was the law St. Ladislaw I, King of Hungary made circa 1085 AD. (Eighty years before that, the law of King St. Stephan I prescribed hanging for the same offense.)

  78. Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have copper in your backyard or immediate fenced in property?

    Get a large mean dog. Few people will risk jumping your fence

  79. So I guess... by michelcolman · · Score: 1

    gold cables are out of the question? Too bad, it would improve the quality of electricity a lot from what I heard.

  80. Hire guards. by arisvega · · Score: 1

    Security guards and, if things get ugly, dogs: it is a proven measure- it is easy to implement in countries where labour is cheap and cablefuckers are on the loose (like, say, Turkey, which is undergoing a boom in the sector of construction). Perhaps in other countries it is more expensive when you have to pay your guards real (non-turkish) salaries, but what the heck: you will be creating a few jobs.

    --
    The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
  81. Solution: Make prisons the easiest targets! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Easy solution...

    Make power cables to prisons facilities that keep cells lit, kitchens powered, washing machines running, maybe even heating, etc the easiest target.

    An odd form of Darwinism will solve the issue overnight.

  82. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by dkf · · Score: 1

    If there is one crime that we should punish with very long vacations from polite society, it should be theft.

    If theft is going to result in "long vacations", so should receiving stolen goods (since it is really "theft by proxy"). After all, it's the fences that enable thieves to dispose of the goods.

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  83. Abortion was made legal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/DonohueLevittTheImpactOfLegalized2001.pdf
    http://www.freakonomics.com/2006/03/16/lets-do-the-crime-drop-again/

  84. Just more reasons to go small nuclear reactors by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    This is just a proof positive that it makes sense to decentralise and get away from government monopolies of utilities. Small nuclear in everything.

  85. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by pz · · Score: 1

    kids were holding on to the back of buses during the winter and "sledding"

    Back in the day, that was called bumper sketching.

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  86. Corrosion resistant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when was copper considered to be corrosion-resistant?

  87. Terrorism by vonshavingcream · · Score: 1

    soon they will pass a law that if you steal copper you are a terrorist. that's basically where this is going. I don't condone the theft of copper, i just think it's crazy that just about any criminal act these days is a threat to national security.

  88. $60 million a year business by chaynlynk · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that stealing copper is a $60 million a year business.

    1. Re:$60 million a year business by Sparky+McGruff · · Score: 1

      That means... Copper thieves are the real Job Creators!

  89. HF Conductivity by jonniesmokes · · Score: 1

    In the description, they write "by exploiting the corrosion-resistance of copper with the conductive properties of steel". But this is copper clad *telecom* wire, so at megahertz or higher frequencies there will be no current in the steel core. Its all in the skin (effect) and the wire will have just the same conductivity as copper wire, minus any magnetic losses. I assume that they have made nice controlled impedance telecom wire, which is, to my knowledge, something cool and new. Kudos to the company that made it!

  90. Steal is poor conductor by pcjunky · · Score: 1

    We got some copper clad steal Cat 5 cable a couple of years ago and had to throw it in the trash. Reason? We couldn't power any POE devices through more than about 50 feet of the stuff. It turns out to have 4 times the resistance per foot compared to copper.

  91. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why any lawyer will tell you to plead the fifth *anytime* you talk to the police. Doesn't matter if you are 100% innocent.

  92. So what is the cause? by assertation · · Score: 1

    Is the world running out of copper or is it that recycling yards make it easy to "fence" stolen copper?

  93. Pennies ? by assertation · · Score: 1

    Someone told me a few years ago that the U.S. government eventually plans to let people sell their copper pennies for copper.

    Any truth to this?

    As someone with a half gallon glass jar of pennies I have been filling since antiquity I am interested to know.

  94. This is most of a century old. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    See copperweld . It's obsolete here in the Midwest, though. The utilities here have been using ACSR for overhead conductors for decades. Buried cable is also aluminum. There is no good reason to use copper for power transmission (there is also no good reason to use copper for building wiring, but that's a different can of worms).

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  95. Most power lines are NOT copper by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Most power lines are NOT copper anyway, they are Aluminum. Aluminum is a better conductor than steel, and almost as good as copper. Rule of thumb is that you have to go down a standard gauge number step for aluminum to replace copper, ie: #12 gauge aluminum replaces #14 gauge copper for the same current. Even so the same length of aluminum wire that carries the same current as copper will be lighter in weight. The only downside of aluminum wire is that for small gauge use standard wire clamps make poor contact due to dissimilar metals. The feed line into most homes is aluminum.

    1. Re:Most power lines are NOT copper by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      The only downside of aluminum wire is that for small gauge use standard wire clamps make poor contact due to dissimilar metals.

      Modern connectors work fine with aluminum and are so rated by UL. You'd be hard put to find devices for sale that are not labeled AL/CU.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Most power lines are NOT copper by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Even so, I would still coat the connection with the special anti-corrosion compound sold for that purpose.
      The better way of using Aluminum wire is to "pigtail" a short length of copper onto the end of the aluminum wire before connecting it to the switch or outlet. A special pigtail tool makes an air tight connection by tightly twisting the wires together, not unlike the method used in wire wrap panels.
      With connections above 20-40A the connectors are heavy enough to compress the joint so tightly that the connection IS airtight. Smaller connectors, even those rated for ALCU require a good heavy turn of the screws to insure they are tight enough, hence the use of the anti-corrosion compound to make sure the connection is air tight.

  96. FBI by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Ya, call them terrorists.. like everything else that walks on 2 legs. Now I'm not saying they aren't criminals, but come on....

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  97. Thieft of Copper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have lived in the USA all my life ,except for a tour of duty in Spain.We seem to have the stupidest people in high places . You stop thieft of copper by removing the scrape dealers from scene . They no longer can buy scrap Copper. Any copper that is bought must have the picture of the seller , his fingerprints , a DNA sample , before he recieves one cent . Wake up people thieves are stupid , and don't want anything on record that can Identify them , most are shady caractors . Just to back up my statement look at the crooks in the senate , and what they have done to our country . Crooks are crooks even in suits .

  98. Yep, more guns and cameras... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing else could be the deterent really.

  99. Copperweld by crispin_bollocks · · Score: 1

    New? Copperweld has been around for amost a century.

  100. marketing flak leaves out important detail by sribe · · Score: 1

    ...an equally effective but far less valuable cable by exploiting the corrosion-resistance of copper with the conductive properties of steel.

    They forget to mention "substantially thicker because steel is substantially less conductive".

    1. Re:marketing flak leaves out important detail by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      No, not much thicker in the large gages used for power transmission. Due to skin effect (enhanced by the magnetic properties of steel) most of the current flows near the surface so the lower conductivity in the steel interior has little effect. What the steel does do (in addition to making the wire cheaper) is make it stronger so that poles can be spaced farther apart. Of course, ACSR does these things better than does copperweld.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:marketing flak leaves out important detail by bussdriver · · Score: 1

      I thought that the skin effect was Hz dependent and that at low Hz it is much lower than at high Hz-- meaning that we probably are using the whole wire except for really thick cables.

      We need a new grid that is designed smarter (not a smart grid) which can handle distributed power sources better; as well as lose less power --- because power costs a whole lot more today we shouldn't be losing 10% or more to the grid (especially if the power is coming from the immediate area's solar panels.)

      What about DC power? a DC grid? resistance losses are due to VOLTAGE not AC/DC and surely we can more cheaply convert DC today than during the AC/DC fight a century ago when DC conversion was difficult and costly. (even if it costs more, consider all the grid tie and sync costs a distributed AC grid needs as well as component lifespan and the fact you can put cables DC underground and not waste power.)

      These cables do not sound like a solution to me. Americans should see what other nations are doing to address the problem and adopt the successful solutions (I know that is "unamerican" but no reason to not hope for maturity.) I hear that somebody did really well by working with recyclers... since copper has to be taken to somebody.

    3. Re:marketing flak leaves out important detail by sribe · · Score: 1

      Of course, ACSR does these things better than does copperweld.

      Ahem, aluminum is both much weaker and a much better conductor than steel. If your analysis were correct, there would be no ACSR--power transmission cables would simply be steel ;-)

  101. Doesn't matter what core is made of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I remember from correctly from the physics class on electricity and magnetism, doesn't all the current travel along the outside of a wire anyhow i.e. it doesn't matter what you make the core of because it has no effect on resistance.

  102. Effect over time. . . by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    You're right if only a small percentage of the grid in a particular area is made up of cabling such as discussed in this article, or aluminum clad steel, etc.

    But, if all of the power and phone cabling, etc gets replaced, and *every time* the thieves steal cable, it's almost worthless, after a few weeks or months you'd see the theft rate drop dramatically as they'll have learned that there's nothing worth stealing anymore.

  103. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Why stop here? Why not death penalty even if you get one little tiny hamburger. And his/her relatives in prison. For life.

    One thing at a time, Ambassador. One thing at a time.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  104. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by systemeng · · Score: 1

    I served on a grand jury a few years back. Based on the cases before us, the police in this area of Alabama have no interest in property crime whatsoever. The entire proceeding was laregely indicting people for drug crimes and the associated murder and mayhem. The way it works out, there is effectively no penalty for property crime thus the rash of them.

  105. Bad physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... by exploiting the corrosion-resistance of copper with the conductive properties of steel.

    Heh? I think the editors got their physics backwards. Steel is corrosion resistant, but is a poor conductor. Copper conducts very well but is also chemically active (which is why it turns green with time).

  106. Facepalm by tunapez · · Score: 1

    You just gave them another great idea, a small army of lawyers thanks you for their job security. Next thing you know they'll be talking about the potential revenues that aren't being generated by the outage and updating their books with all these catastrophic "losses". Oh shit....
     
      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!

    --
    Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
  107. May be worthwhile in power lines, but not at home by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

    In a typical (German, don't know about the US) home you have wire lengths of some ten yards and a thickness of maybe 1.5 mm (AWG 16). That is not that much copper, and adding pigtails at every splice might cost more in terms of work than it saves in metal.
    For cleaning up existing aluminum installations, it may be cheaper than ripping the old cables out though.

    In power lines with much thicker cables and longer distances between slices, however, deciding on aluminium should be a no-brainer.

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  108. New cable? by MTL_514 · · Score: 1

    Copper clad cabling is far from being something new, it pretty much existed since....forever!

  109. I think they are mischaracterizing why it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The copper cladding is not really for corrosion resistance. Copper oxidizes too, just look at the Statue of Liberty. The reason the copper cladding works is because free electrons travel on the surface and not the center of the wire. It's called the skin effect. So you get the strength and cost effectiveness of steel, with the conductance of copper.

    1. Re:I think they are mischaracterizing why it works by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Skin effect only comes into play at high frequencies, usually well into the RF region. At 50-60hz only a very small area in the center of the wire would not be handling any current. Even at AUDIO frequencies the skin effect is marginal. That's why the guys selling Litz wire speaker cables are full of shit with their claims of better frequency response.

    2. Re:I think they are mischaracterizing why it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your point in theory, the depth does depend on frequency and the frequency is low (60Hz) but the depth is still relatively shallow. For example in the US, our 60Hz system means that a copper conductor of more than aboud 8mm is a waste of copper. So if we are talking about very thick cables then we can get the mechanical strength of steel with the conductance of copper by only cladding it in copper.

      Also, to your point, perhaps it's time to take a look at switching the power infrastructure to maybe 120Hz or more and using a frequency divider at the customer site. I know that 60Hz is convenient because the wavelength is very, very long (3k+ miles) and so we don't have to worry so much about matching the the wavelengths, but still do we really have any power delivery systems that are that far away?

  110. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wanted to laugh at your posting, saying, No way can anyone put stupid laws like these into effect; unfortunately, I have seen them myself! I have to admit I feel like it is slowly killing me each time I learn a little more about my government :(

    So, I'll add to yours, I have a 3/4" water pipe coming into my house, and then it drops to 1/2" and I was wondering if I could upgrade my whole house to 3/4"; anyways, I'm searching Google and find my towns Water By-Laws and start reading (really, really slow day) and realized I am breaking many, many, many laws.

    Examples(there are about 50 or so by-laws in total, most are common sense, but a lot of really stupid ones too):
    1. Only allowed one hose to be connected outside... I have a front and back yard to water.... And backyard garden that is quite a ways from the house :( And there are rules to maintain ones property too. (petty: do I fail if I connect three 50ft hoses? -- it states "one hose" after all).
    2. Not allowed to put any raw material down the server (what is piss and shit?)
    3. Not allowed to put any chemicals down the sewer (guess I can never clean my Kitchen or bathroom again -- the document actually says "chemicals"; of course, being really petty, I wonder, "Would treated water (has flouride, clourine, etc) be legally considered a chemical?").
    etc.

    I am sad again now :( Fortunately "Till debt do us part" is about to start so after watching those poor people I always feel better about myself (sad, sad, sad but you take what you can get these days).

  111. Ask for ID by wiedzmin · · Score: 2

    In BC they have introduced the legislation that requires recyclers to ask for government-issued identification for copper recycling and record and report sources of the recycled material to law enforcement. Since introduced last year, wire thefts dropped by something like 80%.

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
  112. Re:May be worthwhile in power lines, but not at ho by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    For cleaning up existing aluminum installations, it may be cheaper than ripping the old cables out though.

    We have it in a bunch of old mobile homes here, like my mom's :)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  113. Re:tomhudson = stalks /. posters via ac troll repl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disappointing. You didn’t include anything about your HOSTS file.

  114. Slashverisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copper-clad steel cables are not new

  115. same here, but... by hurfy · · Score: 1

    They caught one group of thieves that got a business license here (WA) to get around the wait. I wonder how many they haven't caught...

  116. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by tbird81 · · Score: 0

    Okay, I wish I could express it as an equation so your mind could understand it, but:

    When people say "I don't commit crime" they actually mean "I don't commit crime that matters to the majority of people in my culture".

    When someone says "I've had nothing to eat today", do you retort (in your nerdiest voice) "Well, actually you've probably ingested many small organisms which landed in your mouth after 0000h, so, haha [chortle], you have actually eaten today."?

    Stop taking things so literally! Can't you get some sort of book that helps you with interpreting things properly?

  117. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    kids were holding on to the back of buses during the winter and "sledding"

    Back in the day, that was called bumper sketching.

    Really? I thought it was called road bumping... :)

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  118. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    That's a strange definition.

    I take "I've had nothing to eat today" to mean the person hasn't eaten. No I wouldn't chortle about those small organisms since in we don't call that eating.

    Whereas "I don't commit crime" I would take to mean "I don't break any criminal laws", possible "I don't break any laws that classify as felonies". Which I would have though everyone would take as the meaning.

    To the majority of people in the US smoking marijuana as a "crime that doesn't matter", yet I'm pretty sure you go to prison for that in a bunch of places in the US. I certainly wouldn't say "I don't commit crime" if I used marijuana (without say a permissions note from a doctor in a state that has such a thing - though the Federal Government still calls that a crime).

    I'm not taking things liteally. You are just being obtuse.

    In fact the very post being discussed said "all felonies" which covers a while bunch of things that your ridiculous definition does not.

  119. Re:Thief Solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good observation about skin effect, however "skin effect" is really only noticable at much higher frequencies like many tens or hundreds of MHz. At 50Hz or 60Hz which are the most common AC power transmission frequencies, skin effect is practically negligible, and therefore current IS carried throughout the cross-section of the conductor and not just the surface...

  120. Re:Legalize Drugs... [Msg 4 Bro. Maynard and co.] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or stop being hypocrites and ban alcohol, tobacco, and every other product proven to affect brain function, including coffee, tea, sugar, breakfast cereals, any product containing corn or corn by-products, chocolate (don't you DARE!!!) etc.

    Don't forget the orangutans!... :D

  121. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by sco08y · · Score: 0

    In case you hadn't noticed, everything is a felony these days.

    But I agree that a second conviction for theft should carry a very long sentence. Many crimes are crimes of passion, committed under circumstances that are unlikely to be repeated - and many more "crimes" are not really crimes at all - but theft has real victims and thieves have a very high recidivism rate. If there is one crime that we should punish with very long vacations from polite society, it should be theft.

    To be clear, I think Silvergate's drawing attention to a real problem, which is why that title bothers me. Presuming that he's putting his best case forward, the title is complete bullshit.

    The site promoting the book briefly explains how a person commits "three felonies a day".

    Unless the "average American" (I take average to mean typical, not statistical mean) is routinely importing goods, wandering around wetlands, lying about their sick days, receiving classified data, talking to the cops, etc., it's hard to see how he or she is committing three felonies a day. You can even have a drug habit without committing a felony in many cases, and that's probably the worst area of law enforcement overreach in society today.

  122. I don't see this getting used. by Drakin · · Score: 1

    Strange enough, I recall, at least in Canada that the requirements for a grounding conductor be of copper.

    Guess I won't be seeing that around here.

  123. APK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK seemed to disappear for a long time, presumably because his doctors finally found a mix of medications that were effective, but I guess he's been off them recently...

    - T

  124. Re:tomhudson = stalks /. posters via ac troll repl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APK, I have come across your posts on various forums over the years. I have seen how you react to people who have tried to explain that your posts all but incomprehensible due to excessive capitalisation, bolding and quotation and the disjointed style you adopt .

    If someone has recommended that they reply to you as an AC it is only so that you don't follow them in every topic they post in quoting comments from some completely unrelated discussion. I am posting this as an AC for precisely that reason.

    Here's the meat of this comment;
    No-one, except you, cares about whether you 'won' an argument. No-one, except you, cares whether someone 'ran away'. No-one, except you (and some trolls who enjoy winding you up and watching you foam at the mouth) care _unless_ what you have to say is in some way pertinent to the discussion at hand.

    I have come across your post at -1 because I have moderation points and am reading the 0 and -1 posts to see if there are any that are worth modding up. If I had found it at more than that, I would have modded it down - something I almost never do - simply because it has no place in this discussion. People are not modding you down as part of some conspiracy - they are doing it because your posts about things being 'too, too, 2 EASY' are offtopic. They are modding you down because complaining that people have 'run away' have no place on this site. They are modding you down because a post about people conspiring to keep you down is both nonsense and ... offtopic.

    They are modding you down as a way of trying to show you what posts are good and what are not wanted. Please, please try to understand this. It's not an attack on you. It's a way of trying to show you (and other people) what is considered a good post and what is not.

    tomhudson is not a guise or a 'LUSER'. I have seen them post on this site for years. Same for mcgrew and webmisstressrachel. The others I don't immediately recognise (and I'm not about to trawl their previous comments), but given your misidentification of those, I doubt you are any more correct for them.

    _My_ post is wildly offtopic, but after seeing your return to this paranoid and, frankly, creepy stalking of users you think are harassing you I am taking the time to try and get through. Post comments that are relevant to the topic. Stop trying to 'win' - not everyone is going to agree with you, learn to live with it. Pick one method of drawing attention to text - capitals or bold, not both. Stop with the excessive quotes - a relevant link or two is great, more than that and maybe you should consider submitting an article.

    Hope this helps explain the reactions you get and goes some way towards helping improve your posts.

  125. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Is file sharing a felony?

  126. Thieves and bad system by luk3Z · · Score: 0

    Thieves will exist until all people will earn equal. Thieves = result of bad economy system. Some people earn 500$ monthly and some 50 000$.

    --
    Recipes for USA bankrupt - http://tinypaste.com/0d66f dd = dollar deluge (printed in the infinity)
  127. Oh dear by dewexdewex · · Score: 1

    There's nothing for it: we'll just have to go wireless.

  128. Re:The problem is thieves. Get rid of them. by Rakarra · · Score: 1

    You are quite right, the parent should have said "I do not commit crime... that any DA would care about prosecuting."

  129. Cheaper to use Fe coated with Cu, why not already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Fe coated with Cu cable is equally good, but cheaper, why hasn't it been used everywhere?

  130. There's been studies on this by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it's not so much that the teachers are better, it's that they're equally distributed. In America, property taxes pay for public schools. So if you live in a poor neighborhood you have low value property, low property taxes and therefore underfunded schools. It's a clever way for the rich to have nice public schools w/o paying for the poor to get same. Finland doesn't allow that, they distribute the funds equally, and have no private schools. Adam Smith talked about this in Wealth of Nations. One of the checks and balances on the evils of Capitalism was suppose to be that the rich lived in the same environment as the poor (social and economic as well as natural); so if they screwed the poor they were really just screwing themselves. The world is big enough that that isn't true. Heck, forget the world, just the good 'ol US of A is big enough for the rich to ignore the plight of the poor.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/