Slashdot Mirror


Most IT Admins Have Considered Quitting Due To Stress

Orome1 writes "The number of IT professionals considering leaving their job due to workplace stress has jumped from 69% last year to 73%. One-third of those surveyed cited dealing with managers as their most stressful job requirement, particularly for IT staff in larger organizations. Handling end user support requests, budget squeeze and tight deadlines were also listed as the main causes of workplace stress for IT managers. Although users are not causing IT staff as much stress as they used to, it isn't stopping them from creating moments that make IT admins want to tear their hair out in frustration. Of great concern is the impact that work stress is having on health and relationships. While a total of 80% of participants revealed that their job had negatively impacted their personal life in some way, the survey discovered some significant personal impact: 18% have suffered stress-related health issues due to their work, and 28% have lost sleep due to work."

397 comments

  1. IT admins are special by Tourney3p0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Join the club. We meet at the bar after work.

    1. Re:IT admins are special by Kaptain+Kruton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The bar must be empty because the work never ends.

    2. Re:IT admins are special by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As an software engineer(and thus not an IT admin), IT admins have it much worse than most middle class office workers. They get shit on over the smallest thing, and are the only IT employees who are expected to deliver within minutes of being asked. I don't think it's a stretch to say their stress levels might be higher than yours.

    3. Re:IT admins are special by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Join the club. We meet at the bar during work.

      FTFY.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:IT admins are special by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In terms of certain job expectations they are. These include longer hours and working weekends and during the 3rd shift.

      A lot of mundanes don't understand this. They hear that you've got some office job and they don't understand why you would be working those kinds of hours.

      Clueless spouses can add to the stress level. Even spouses that are part of the workforce can be ignorant and unsympathetic.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:IT admins are special by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      No your wife will not understand no matter what your job is. She will undoubtedly have worked more then you did, no matter what.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    6. Re:IT admins are special by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      This should be modded informative not funny.

      When the clock says 17:30 the drinking can begin. Until my next on call rotation, then I have to be sober for a whole week. That shit should be illegal.

    7. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am expected to be on call 24/365 even on my vacation (but I am not expected to come into the office if I am abroad or can come up with a good excuse, then I only have to control one of the other ppl by remote.. until the problem is resolved). I have been trying to get them to hire a second person but "the economy does not allow it". We are just under 300 employees + about 50 consultants and have every legacy system imaginable (even still some VMS machines). I have shitty pay (4k/month) and cant get a job anywhere else since I just turned 50. Life for the ageing sysadmin are GREAT!

    8. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you call $4000 every fucking MONTH a shitty pay I have absolutely no sympathy for you.

    9. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which Bar? The Foo Bar?

    10. Re:IT admins are special by noh8rz10 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      agreed with Tourney... lots of jobs really suck, and lots of people are stressed to the point of health impacts and have considered quitting. Many of these jobs pay significantly less than IT wages. also, the survey in the summary showed a jump from 69% last year to 73% this year? stop the presses!

    11. Re:IT admins are special by BrokenSoldier · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Depends on where he lives.

      --
      If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is.
    12. Re:IT admins are special by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That is only $48k. That is terrible pay for sysadmin work.

    13. Re:IT admins are special by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      We prefer to drink alone anyway, everyone's just another fucking user.

      In all seriousness, I've quit admin jobs due to stress, & would do it again if put in the same position. Luckily, I have a great boss now & a fairly cruisy admin job.

    14. Re:IT admins are special by ogar572 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Based on this comment, it seems you have been married awhile.

    15. Re:IT admins are special by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Keep a bottle in your desk so the bar never ends.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    16. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      48K is not particularly good. Consider how much it would cost to pay a mortgage, a car loan, all the bills, maintenance on your property, put your kids through school, etc. and it's not really enough.

    17. Re:IT admins are special by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      $4k a month? Not shitty pay.
      $4k a month for 24/7 on-call access? Shitty pay.

      Hours in a (30 day) month: 720.
      $4k for that entire month works out to about $5.50 an hour.

      Of course this is a little silly to think that you will be working all 24 hours of every single day, but even if you cut out the weekends (I'll say 9 weekends in a 30 day month) this means you're working 504 hours, which works out to be almost $8 an hour.

      Even if we break this down further and say, nobody will call you on the weekends or late night (HA), giving you a "simple" 12 hour work day you end up working 252 hours, which works out to be $15/hr.

      Nobody is saying $4k isn't a nice chunk of change to bring home every day, but consider this: if he was working a normal 40 hour workweek (more like 50 knowing the IT field), he would be making $23 an hour - which is a pretty decent salary... for someone who's working 40 hours a week in an office.

      You have no sympathy because I'm not sure you really understands what it means to be on-call 24 hours a day.

    18. Re:IT admins are special by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      It's typical for the state of Pennsylvania outside Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, or Philly... Actually I made slightly less.... Went back to school for business because I can certainly do anything my bosses ever did and they made 2-10x what I did...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    19. Re:IT admins are special by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      To be fair, the way we design networks sucks. Way too much remote hardware and permissions. Way too little graceful failure. Add to that custom in-house software written by brogramming monkeys.

      Way too much of this "You stood on the shoulders of geniuses to accomplish something as fast as you could, and before you even knew what you had, you patented it, and packaged it, and slapped it on a plastic lunchbox, and now (bangs on table) you have network issues."

      --
      Good-bye
    20. Re:IT admins are special by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Really?
      I would not open xterm for that kind of money. Is this windows only folks maybe?

    21. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No sympathy?

      OK, lets do the math:
      Taxes, about 1k
      Housing, about 1k
      Cars/fuel, about 500
      Food (two ppl), about 300
      3 x Kids (school, clothes, etc.), about 1k

      YAY! 200 for happy fun time, savings and unforeseen expenses.

    22. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We prefer to drink alone anyway, everyone's just another fucking user.

      God DAMN that's the truth. I'm so sick of everyone by the end of my 60 hour work week - that decompression consists of putting the phone in airplane mode and getting immersed in TV. Alone.

    23. Re:IT admins are special by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      See this is why i settle for lower paying IT jobs that require very little out of me. Hell, I spend most of my time looking busy and reading books on my phone. Granted I'm not making much over 40k, but i don't have kids or anything so it's fine. Sure there are always stressful moments like last week when the server power supply went out but all in all I think i have it good.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    24. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4k is laughable. I'm at 140k/year as a sysadmin, minimal oncall (maybe one or two incidents a month)

      get a new job

    25. Re:IT admins are special by datavirtue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Admin is just a step up from help desk, hang out too long and it will begin to suck badly. If you fail to increase your skills (most admins) and your ability to add value, then it will start to suck badly after a number of years--it's boring. How many servers can you provision or user accounts can you setup before pulling your fucking hair out? Learn to code, become a professional DBA, or acquire some more skills that makes you valuable, like perhaps getting involved with business intelligence. Admins are a commodity. Yes, it is easy to hang out and collect a paycheck, but don't whine when your value wanes and people direct you around like a monkey boy.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    26. Re:IT admins are special by Githaron · · Score: 1

      There is value in knowing that when you leave work no one if likely to bother you until the next work day.

    27. Re:IT admins are special by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Dude, 50k a year is shit fucking pay! Do you live in Malaysia or something?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    28. Re:IT admins are special by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      Turlock, Central Valley California. I make $11 and hour. about $1500 a month. Granted I work in an office of 17 people and the work isn't stressful so I am more than happy to trade money for a healthier heart.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    29. Re:IT admins are special by ambidextroustech · · Score: 1

      I agree with datavirtue. If you can, learn some new skills. It may be stressful, but it's good stress and it mixes things up a bit.

    30. Re:IT admins are special by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      My commute is 5 minutes, I never see users and I still would not go for that deal.

      For $11/hour you can work at McDonalds.

    31. Re:IT admins are special by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see what you did there. Haha. And no.... the name of the place is PEBKAC.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    32. Re:IT admins are special by DrGamez · · Score: 2

      I used to work on call as tech support for a chain of restaurants in WA state.
      I now work as a SDET under contract in an office. I cannot tell you the amount of joy I feel every day at 5:01pm, when I cease to exist to the company until 9am the next day.

    33. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stress is still stress whether you make 6 figures or are barely scraping by.

    34. Re:IT admins are special by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      lots of jobs really suck, and lots of people are stressed to the point of health impacts and have considered quitting. Many of these jobs pay significantly less than IT wages.

      Whenever I get stressed out, I remember the jobs I did before/while I was in college, and I'm happy to be where I am. I can't imagine what today's grads do without any work experience at low-wage McJobs. Consider quitting I guess?

    35. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a server power supply failure causes you stress then I think you are in the right place being a low end sysadmin making 40k a year.

    36. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      75k is the happy mark, stress seems a lot more manageable above that point.

    37. Re:IT admins are special by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      I also have a 5 minute commute. And yea, I could work at McDonalds but I doubt I would have the time to post shit on /. between the burger flipping. Here I kick back, read books and jump on shit when it breaks.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    38. Re:IT admins are special by Synerg1y · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Life was simpler back then too... the female co-workers were also hotter.

      It's the fear of uncertainty that prevents a lot of people from quitting and the family dynamic also plays a heavy hand in it. Ultimately, you have to have confidence in yourself and a savings account to successfully quit a job you don't like... but this factors in on the 90% vs 10% competence ratio most people agree on in IT: Some people everybody wants, some people are happy anybody wants them to work for them.

      My advice is and always will be: go read some tech books and pick up relevant skills,... or go back to school. Managers tend to be happy (regardless of how they act towards you!) and that's due to the 75k happy mark.

    39. Re:IT admins are special by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      where's the redundant power supply at? :P

    40. Re:IT admins are special by osu-neko · · Score: 5, Funny

      My commute is 5 minutes, I never see users and I still would not go for that deal.

      For $11/hour you can work at McDonalds.

      I'd do admin work for that kind of pay, but there's no way you could get me to work at any kind of restaurant for that little... that's real work.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    41. Re:IT admins are special by ambidextroustech · · Score: 1

      Once you add children, then 48K is not really much at all.

    42. Re:IT admins are special by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      As well as takes your career to the next level, it might comes as a shock but jobs that require more skills tend to pay more :)

    43. Re:IT admins are special by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      Right... what possible value can VPN or web services add to a business right?

      I'm not sure how / if network admins with no business sense differ from code monkeys, but I'm sure glad I'm not either.

      Ultimately though, the network exists to meet the need of the business (the guys who sign your paychecks).

    44. Re:IT admins are special by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1

      You cannot find someone who knows how to turn on a Cisco router and type 'show run', and or, install/partition Linux, in the San Francisco Bay Area for $50k/year. More like $80k/year. $4k/month gets you a receptionist. Where is this data from geographically?

    45. Re:IT admins are special by Synerg1y · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The reason most of you work so many hours is because you're sheeple. I'm sorry to say this and I don't say it in a funny sense at all, but at some point you've got to put your foot down... if somebody asked me to work on a Saturday I'd ask not to work on that Monday, if they need me for both... well shit pay me. And management knows I'll work on a Saturday, I've stated it multiple times... I've been asked once... for the ERP system transition (big big fish).

    46. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And once you're there you can be responsible for the servers AND the database server running on them. Just For Men, here we come!

    47. Re:IT admins are special by DrGamez · · Score: 1

      These numbers were pulled out of my butt (in reference to what an "ok salary" is), but the rest of the math remains the same.

    48. Re:IT admins are special by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      exactly nothing when the net connection goes down, leaving said admin with absolutely no influence over the solution besides picking up a phone and bitching. of course management still thinks he does despite its insistence on the remote services in the first place. being held accountable for things one has decreasing amounts of control over is probably the most critical cause of workplace stress, and i ts getting worse.

    49. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a real place in Melbourne, FL

    50. Re:IT admins are special by 50000BTU_barbecue · · Score: 1

      This is why I drink at work. Of course I work at home now. Canadian Club Sherry Cask. It's a decent go-to whisky for everyday needs. Fridays is when I start with the single malt Speysiders... Holy crap I love drinking!

      --
      Mostly random stuff.
    51. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A lot of developers have to deliver in minutes as well. THE APPLICATION DOESN'T DO THIS BUT I TOLD THE CUSTOMER IT DID BUT IT WASNT IN THE SPEC MEETING IN 30 MINUTES FIX AND TEST NOW GET ON STAGING NOW!

    52. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, if your employer told you that he was lying. Maybe for a junior admin... But most junior (unix) admins I know make 50k to start. By the time you're middle tier you should be at 70-75 (In the Philly area no less) and a senior admin makes 90-100 (sometimes even more depending on what special application they support). This is all based on sampling in the Philadelphia area, I'm a CTO in that area.

    53. Re:IT admins are special by Synerg1y · · Score: 2

      There's a position for that... DBA. You're thinking mom n pop IT sweat shop where 2 guys write the code, manage the servers, and the network. Fuck their couch, only college grads should be looking at those till they learn better and get their foot in the door... bringing me back to my original post, for a college grad that stress = $$$$$$$ down the road when they become the IT QB and are no longer bothered with trivial tier I/II stuff.

    54. Re:IT admins are special by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Say hello to Earthworm Jim.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    55. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could've respected that... except you're wasting your free time on video games (sig ref) and will probably die a virgin. Self-improvement buddy that's where the respect's at.

    56. Re:IT admins are special by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Personally I was supporting Windows, Linux, and Apple... So no, not just windows. I also was not the only one, I worked with admins from a dozen companies from time to time and pay varied from $40k-55k. Those making $55k were in their 50's and had started (often at these companies) during the 70's or at most 80's...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    57. Re:IT admins are special by bzipitidoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      None of my high paying jobs have been any fun. Seems that enjoying your job is somehow immoral. Many managers think that if you aren't stressed, you must not have enough work to do. A bigger problem is that if you're on a job at a foundering company, it doesn't matter how good your work is. The company is failing, and some will be looking for others to blame.

      The only fun job I had was a low paying one. Because it was low pay, I didn't care about being fired. Nor did I have to worry about it. Would have been easy to find a higher paying job, and they were not going to be able to easily replace me, not at that pay rate. Actually did a better job than if I had been under the gun.

      The most stressful job I ever had was one in which the project didn't just fail, it never got off the ground because the various factions were too busy fighting each other to agree on what to do. All sides were slamming everyone involved. If I didn't present a plan, I got beat up for that. When I did present a plan, I got beat up on the pretext of it being inadequate, and me being too stupid to understand that it wasn't adequate. The actual reason was that the manager was a fool who felt it was necessary for his job security that the plan be his plan. Didn't address the substance of any of the ideas at all, in large part because he didn't have the competence to do so. All that mattered to him was that his name was on it. He often took others' plans, tweaked them in ways he thought made them more palatable but actually made them less credible, such as by removing time allotted to deal with various difficulties we were trying to anticipate. Naturally, he'd harshly criticize the person responsible for putting in such "negative" things. And every time the other teams tore "his" plan apart. Then it was quickly revealed that it wasn't actually his plan after all, it was someone else's plan even when it wasn't. He would of course return the favor and try to rip their plans apart. In hindsight, I should have just quit that job, it was that bad. In the end, in a desperate attempt by management to save their own necks, the lowly among us were blamed and "quitted". But it didn't work, and shortly after, the company lost the contract and they lost their jobs.

      No doubt McJobs have horrible managers, but their power and leverage is more limited. A McJob simply doesn't have the same level of responsibility, and there's not a whole lot they can credibly blame on some poor peon. Nor is the threat of wrecking your career particularly credible. When you have more responsibility, you can be criticized and blamed for more things, be more easily made into a scapegoat, and your career can be ruined. Have you ever heard of anyone going on a murder/suicide frenzy over a McJob? I haven't. Possibly the closest are the "going postal" incidents. Suicides happen with a bit more frequency in jobs with more responsibility.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    58. Re:IT admins are special by Damnshock · · Score: 1

      $48k terrible? I really need to move to the US. Definitely Spain is a "third world" country

    59. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point exactly.

    60. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Spot on. Too many people are eager to "please" their management and afraid to be assertive. Ask - politely, firmly, and explain the rationale - for flex time if you have to work a weekend.

      If you're SO critical that being away from your desk for a day grinds the company to a halt, then:
      1) You're doing a poor job of automating your work;
      2) You've got a tremendous case for hiring an assistant (of course, if he comes in and starts doing #1 above... you might be in trouble);
      3) If you keep offering to work 90 hour weeks to be "indispensible," then your management will let you.

      First things first: Focus on item 1 above. There's probably a million things you can automate that you're not doing so right now, out of laziness, ineptitude, or simply "not having enough time":
      -- If laziness, suck it up, buttercup. If you're working 90 hours a week because you're too lazy to accomplish your work in less time, then that's your own fault. Zero sympathy.
      -- If ineptitude, start reading and hacking out some code for the minor stuff - learn as you go. Find someone senior/more knowledgeable and offer to buy them a cup of coffee and ask for their input on how to approach programming solutions to some of your problems.
      -- If "not having enough time," realize that if you're too busy mopping to shut off the water, you're going to be stuck in your current position forever, and miserable.

    61. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking as junior faculty (pre-tenure) who makes $90k, I can tell you that the stress doesn't get easier to handle. Truth is, you just have more to lose. Certainly in a job like academics, there is a precipitous drop if you don't make the tenure cut. I'd gladly take a paycut to $75k it if meant I had my nights and weekends back.

    62. Re:IT admins are special by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      The less the manager knows about his/her department, the more paranoid they are. I had some stupid PM try to blame me for not completing a project in the alloted time frame when they changed their rubric and added new requirements throughout the project w/o adjusting hours (we're talking about contracting for a small fly by night code shop where the lead coder was the network admin).

      What'd I do you say? I milked the shit out of them... the project's core was never really in danger, but she was a bitch, so I went over hours got paid and left / got fired. She offered a bit more hours but at that point I was like fuck you and my firm agreed so we ended it. The project was published 2 months later > added to portfolio. Imho shitty managers should be treated as just that: shit.

      And never forget why you go to work... to get paid :)

    63. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Admins vary according to where you work. I'm a sysadmin, and I'm well respected among peers. I know how to code, I do DBA stuff, and I get paid well above average for most sysadmins because of the skill and experience I have and the work that I do. Now, I will say that over 90% of most sysadmin jobs could be done with a monkey that can copy paste error messages into google. And their bosses know this, and pay them little. When you are responsible for thousands of software packages, newer hardware and software where you have $500k+ of hardware coming your way and have to support users, do backups, scale out, keep current, and so on, well. Its quite a bit above help desk to say the least.

      I will also say it is very stressful. I recently "lost it" and got fired from my last job from the stress, and after over 6 months off from work, I'm about to relocate and start a new job with a slightly smaller hardware budget and with slightly different set of responsibilities, and I'm concerned that I cannot take the stress again. Only time will tell.

    64. Re:IT admins are special by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you ever called an admin to thank them for fixing something?
      Even if you did, the helpdesk wouldn't even make a note of it, forget about communicate the gratitude to those deserving of it.
      Yet when there's a problem, the admin will be the first to hear. It'll be the only thing he ever hears.
      Few professions have to deal with such constant negativity.

      Thank god I'm not an admin myself (developer; we sometimes get to finish things, release the product and move on), but I've seen this happen to collegues and some friends.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    65. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Haven't you met any exIT worker behind the bar(in other side)?

      My experience is working in Pizzeria with 4 people(different ages) total with IT educational/professional background...

    66. Re:IT admins are special by dragon-file · · Score: 1

      I'd do admin work for that kind of pay, but there's no way you could get me to work at any kind of restaurant for that little... that's real work.

      See? He gets it.

      --
      Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
    67. Re:IT admins are special by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      None of my high paying jobs have been any fun.

      Look around the office. See anyone looking at the screen smiling? They are on Facebook or socialising in some IM chat. You don't 'smile' at work unless you are a clown, and even then its usually just the makeup.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    68. Re:IT admins are special by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stress is still stress whether you make 6 figures or are barely scraping by.

      Nonsense. You don't know what stress is until you have four hungry kids and no job. I started at the bottom of the tech world, but today I make a solid six figure salary. Money like that can smooth out a lot of life's problems.

    69. Re:IT admins are special by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is quite a lot of evidence that societies where the wealth gap is smaller (say Norway) are a happier. In other words it's not so much what you are getting, it's more about getting your "fair" share of it. Makes sense when you look at a bunch of smiling African villagers all living hand to mouth. If you follow the money = happiness theory those villagers should all be suicidal.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    70. Re:IT admins are special by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Such is life. IT Manager, you are an overhead, as far as profits are concerned overheads are evil. You must prove you generate income and profit, doing so will raise your status from evil to good, in a world where profit is God. Learn fancy accounting terms, spread sheet massaging and economics, you don't really have to generate a profit, you just have to make it look like you do ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    71. Re:IT admins are special by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I've worked plenty of long hours setting up system s in data centres or away from home contracting gigs where working in the hotel room at night going through the days results was more interesting than the crap on tv.

      Why are you assuming only guys work long hours?

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    72. Re:IT admins are special by jacobsm · · Score: 1

      I'm not a Sysadmin, I'm a specialist(zOS Systems Programmer) with 34 years in the business, and I make a heck of a lot more than 48K. Most of the time my manager (who's a real @#$!!**@#$) leaves me alone to do my job.

    73. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet that's the going rate for a Jr Sysadmin these day in Texas. I know because this article hit me like a bullet. This stress issue is so me! I'm looking for a way out. I'm going to die of stress. I can't even find time to spend it with my son!!! I look foreword to sleep is about the only recreation time I have if you want to call it that. I no longer have a group of friends, I don't keep up with the latest in social trends, name an actor or movie and my eyes glaze over. I'm living in my own virtual prison for six years now. I've become self institutionalized. I live to work.

      My life is fucked!

    74. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like help desk not sysadmin.

    75. Re:IT admins are special by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Old fart Aussie here, working life summary; rural HS drop out -15ys blue collar - Degree - 20+yrs white collar. (military draft ended when I was 15).
      Agree with the your "relativity" theory. You want stress then drive a taxi at night, you want physical and mental exhaustion to the point of visual hallucinations then work as a deck hand in the souther ocean. Most of the stress in an office comes from two sources, yourself and bully boy superiors. Out of those two, it's your own "wheels" that are more likely to drive you crazy. I find it helps if you have a soothing soundtrack for your memories..

      Take it easy, take it easy.
      Don't let the sound of your own wheels drive you crazy .
      Lighten up while you still can.
      Don't even try to understand.
      Just find a place to make your stand, and take it easy.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    76. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's sad and scary that was modded funny.

    77. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you assume that admins can't code, aren't already qualified to be DBAs, etc.?

      You're stereotyping.

    78. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, but his wife has been married longer.

    79. Re:IT admins are special by BrokenSoldier · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ugh. Been there done that. 36,000 a year as a support/sucktomer service manager for a laptop reseller. Took it because I was coming off being unemployed for 2+ months and I have 4 kids and a house. Left it after 10 months when a recruiter briefly mentioned that I could probably do better and helped me massage my resume a bit after answering 80+ emails a day, phone calls from whiny needy gamers that were too dumb to re-seat RAM in their 3000 dollar laptop, and expected 24 hour or less contact resolution based on the timestamp of the email. Most of which was not put out to me during the interview and first 2 weeks or so...... Interview your boss, don't just 'be' interviewed, and if you can gather some intelligence about the place first so much the better.

      --
      If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is.
    80. Re:IT admins are special by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Life was simpler back then too

      Yep, no job seekers strees back then, every new years day some bloke on TV would play the role of a bingo caller and pull out a bunch of golf balls from a wire cage, if your birthday was written on one of the balls the military just picked you up by the testicles and dropped you into an Asian jungle. /sarcasm

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    81. Re:IT admins are special by Goody · · Score: 2

      I have to agree. When I was maintaining servers, a power supply failure was a great outage to have, laughable in fact. Stress was losing a disk array on a box hosting 5,000 customers or an Exchange server that ran the company pissing all over itself.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    82. Re:IT admins are special by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      In short, get a MBA degree.

    83. Re:IT admins are special by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is easy to hang out and collect a paycheck, but don't whine when your value wanes and people direct you around like a monkey boy.

      On the other hand you'll have less stress if you don't worry and laugh-a while you can.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    84. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll say 9 weekends in a 30 day month

      I wonder if I can get my employer to adopt your calendar.

    85. Re:IT admins are special by wmac1 · · Score: 1

      I was IT manager in a Bank with 300 branches. I had less personnel than needed and everyone including myself was stressed.

      At one point in time, I became 100% sure that I will have a heart attack in the next 6 months. I applied to a postgraduate course and ran away after 8 years of working in the bank.

      I am now in the peaceful academy. The only thing I should do is to teach well and correct papers in an acceptable way (to keep both school and students happy). Besides the work is a real service to society, not just a service to make bank owners more rich.

    86. Re:IT admins are special by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      No, we don't.

      We keep a bottle in the drawer, sometimes another two in the server room...

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    87. Re:IT admins are special by schnell · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you ever called an admin to thank them for fixing something? Even if you did, the helpdesk wouldn't even make a note of it, forget about communicate the gratitude to those deserving of it.

      I work for a large evil soulless multinational megacorporation. Every time I have an interaction with our IT helpdesk (some of which are outsourced overseas, some of which are domestic), I am prompted via e-mail repeatedly until I fill out a form associated with my specific case ID describing how my interaction was with my IT rep(s), if my problem was solved, was the IT person helpful, etc. I don't know how it is at smaller companies, but I can at least tell you that in my company, every IT interaction receives some kind of rating - good or bad - and that's a powerful incentive for the company to reward its IT management, or fire them.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    88. Re:IT admins are special by ArsonSmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Man, do i fell sorry for you. While if I wont the big lottery I would likely quit, I still enjoy going to my job every day. I have worked to be the best at what I do and have been rewarded pretty well for it. If you're not then either you are not the best, or what you chose to do isn't very difficult.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    89. Re:IT admins are special by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      The direct path from server admin is systems engineer and architect. Get out of the ticket queue and into the big project planning.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    90. Re:IT admins are special by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Find out why you don't have control over it and take that control.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    91. Re:IT admins are special by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      And IT charge back. Run your IT department as a profit center. Make sure other projects are paying you for your services even if only on paper. If they want to cut how much they pay, you cut how much you service.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    92. Re:IT admins are special by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      Typically only people in jobs they really arent qualified for work long hours. There are some exceptions, overtime, bonus pay or really really enjoying the job. I've found I get more done in 8 hours than most of the 60 hour weekers do in two of their 12 hour days.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    93. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably the only job where if anyone knows who you are, you're not doing your job.

      The best sysadmins are the one's that keep a lid on the boiling pot without anyone being the wiser how busted the whole system is, and its always busted, despite what the programmers claim. And all it takes is one minor boil over, bug, or security hole to make you look like a complete tool, in which case, suddenly everyone knows who you are.

      When you think about it, it's kind of like Men In Black, only with longer hours.

    94. Re:IT admins are special by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Richard G .Wilkinson would agree with you. Though the wealth inequality gap in the US is vast, the nation is also the most multicultural too.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cZ7LzE3u7Bw

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    95. Re:IT admins are special by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Who doesn't drink at the office?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    96. Re:IT admins are special by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      This is basically the point I'm trying to make.
      I don't know how "thanks" sounds in your native tongue, but I doubt it sounds like "you received a 25% complaint rate over the last 6 months".

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    97. Re:IT admins are special by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      You couldn't afford to live in a cardboard box in Silicon Valley for $75k. It's pointless to try to put a dollar figure threshold on comfort without adjusting for your location.

    98. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This.

      DO NOT DO UNPAID OVERTIME.

      High stress levels? Hell yeah if you are always at work and never relax. 40 hours / week is the maximum. After that you just stress out and your quality of work begins to suck. Your quality of life will also suck.

    99. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close, Sweden...

    100. Re:IT admins are special by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      These days I try to make a point of only working the fixed 40 hours unless something goes boom. Back when I did consulting as a BA you were often committed by a sales drone to deliver analysis and findings in a timeframe that wasn't consistent with a sustainable work/life balance (you'd estimate 80 hours work they'd say to the client you could deliver next week kind of thing).

      I don't do that sort of work any more for a reason.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    101. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is cliche at this point, but... thats the point of things like bitcoin

    102. Re:IT admins are special by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Sure if you consider budgeting, planning, and executing large IT projects 'helpdesk'. Those range from building mesh wireless networks (when wireless was still 'new'), linux remote desktop kiosk setups, and state compliant customer information databases on one side... To 'normal' things like setting up file servers, network storage backups, email servers, etc.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    103. Re:IT admins are special by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      You'll note I said "outside Pittsburgh, Harrisburg, or Philly". I could move an hour south to Pittsburgh and make similar, but up here by lake erie where I own a house (which is unlikely to ever sell as the market is dead) wages are stagnant and low to begin with. On the other hand 40k here means you can own a house, car, and with some work support a family (my own parents never made more than 50k combined here).

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    104. Re:IT admins are special by ewenix · · Score: 1

      The bar has wifi, so we can remote in an fix stupid user problems in between drinks.

    105. Re:IT admins are special by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I did not intend to offend, just the low salary and inclusion of Apple, which has no more servers made me assume.

    106. Re:IT admins are special by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I own a home near lake Erie as well, near Buffalo. I would put the parents income guidlines as spot on.

    107. Re:IT admins are special by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      For a Jr, it is not that bad. $50k is about Jr money. One day when you trade the Jr for Sr or just drop the Jr, you will get more money.

      The stress issue is separate, not all employers are like that.

    108. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life was simpler back then too... the female co-workers were also hotter.

      Wow, what an asshole. And people wonder why there's not a lot of women in tech.

    109. Re:IT admins are special by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 0

      "Life was simpler back then too... the female co-workers were also hotter."

      Really dude? Way to make all of us guys sound like neanderthals! We got to stop doing that.

      I know your just trying to make a joke but there ARE Women in IT and who read Slashdot.

      --

      Gorkman

    110. Re:IT admins are special by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      My current boss is excellent with end user relations and even knows a little about systems....but she has NO CLUE when it comes to the server level stuff we do. I like her though as she usually defers the tech decisions to us as long as we can paint it in warm and fuzzies. Plus when we have to take time off for our family she gets it....but it's the ones above her that REALLY have no clue. They wanted to switch the database from Oracle(running on Power hardware) to SQL Server(on Intel of course) and did not know that with the particular product we run you have to switch out the whole entire infrastructure including the app server....and they supposedly specialize in being CIO's in our particular industry. I wanted to scream.

      --

      Gorkman

    111. Re:IT admins are special by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      I've investigated engineering and being a solutions architect. I "fell back" to being a Unix admin. I'm pretty good at my job I guess and have been making 6 figures, doing it since around 2000 (I actually received a "golden handcuffs" certificate from my manager at the time when I went over 6 figures :) ). I've changed jobs 5 times since then if you include a short consulting gig over seas back in 2004.

      I'm constantly learning new skills including programming and data base administration. For personal projects and some work stuff. I automate tasks and create documentation and encourage my coworkers to do the same. Heck, in large part due to my scripting and documentation we're managing a bit over 1,000 systems (virtual and physical) with just 5 sysadmins (2 open spots though; anyone looking for a job?).

      On the other hand though, I have put in a bit too many long days (this week in particular has been a bad one) and have been married and divorced twice but I think the personality that makes me a good admin also makes relationships difficult. Maybe. At least experience suggests it.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    112. Re:IT admins are special by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Cars/fuel, about 500

      $500 is 390EUR that buys me 255l of gasoline over here which gives me 3640km of driving. A month. Which is ~180km per working day. Do you commute 90km a day? No way I would do that.

      Housing, about 1k

      The property tax is negligible. Heating+electricity is less then $250/month for me. For a flat of ~60 m^2. Yes, I would take double size of that, but it still would be much less then 1k.

      Of course my employer knows it and pays me peanuts compared to numbers mentioned in this thread. It's still not bad considering that I commute 10 minutes by foot and have a stable job for years to come. Even in this shitty era.

    113. Re:IT admins are special by Culture20 · · Score: 1, Funny
      I'm getting drunk. Are there any girls there?

      Really dude? Way to make all of us guys sound like neanderthals!

      Neanderthals!? I've got a neanderthal-slaying knife! It's got a plus 9 against neanderthals!

      I know your just trying to make a joke but there ARE Women in IT and who read Slashdot.

      OK, but if there's any girls there, I wanna DO them!

    114. Re:IT admins are special by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Money like that can create a lot of problems too. It's not always about money. Who cares if you make 6 figures if you can never go to a kids event because you are going to be pulled away for some stupid stuff.

      --

      Gorkman

    115. Re:IT admins are special by airdweller · · Score: 1

      You must be about 25 years old. Believe me - you need a more challenging activity. Otherwise you're in for a lot of regret when you hit mid-30's.

    116. Re:IT admins are special by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      That kind of depends on the things you worry about. If you're confident in the security of your job or the security of your finances should the job disappear from under you, then yes, that six-figure salary helps. But if your worries include things like whether little Johnny is getting some 15-year-old girl pregnant, well, no amount of money is going to help with that.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    117. Re:IT admins are special by Synerg1y · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Women in IT need to get over themselves, I could care less what they think.

      And if they personally get offended by a little one liner on slashdot, then I'm the least of their problems.

    118. Re:IT admins are special by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I didn't. It is just my experience no matter how hard the guy works, it is not good enough for the wife. Sometime she is right.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    119. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, you're right.

      I'm extremely well paid from some reason. Luck I guess. But christ on a motherfucking donkey, my life is hell. I'm considering going back onto antidepressants to cope (it helps a lot, but side effects such as weight gain and dependency are a concern). I used to run 7.5Km every morning last year to cope - and it helped, but it was hell on my joints. After catching flu for a few weeks, I lost my running rythm, and stopped. Getting so fucking early in the moming to have time to run is also fucking stressful. Fuck that.

      My chronic stress is affecting my marriage and my beautiful baby girls...

      However, it's helping pay off my house - just a few more years to go. Once that's done, FUCK THIS SHIT! I'm going to quit and look for a nice admin-type job somewhere at a fucking universaity - even at one tenth my current rate.

      I like your idea about a low paying job not being stressful, because hey, if you lose it, fuck that, there's plenty others out there where someone needs top skills, but doesn't have the budget to pay. /me sighs

      just a few more stressful years.

      I pounded my work notebook yesterday, the thing is fucked. More stress because it had documents on it that I need.

      oh well.

    120. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly.

      or so fucking chronically stressed (like me) from earning those 6 figures, that you're not yourself and don't treat your family right.

    121. Re:IT admins are special by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      I was on a project like that. They were to migrate an existing application suite, with at least 20 years of cruft, from an ancient version of Informix to MySQL. In 6 weeks. Maybe a crack team of the very best could have made that deadline, but this was a group of mediocre to bad code monkeys. They brought me in when they had reached the 3 month mark and the end was nowhere in sight.

      Only one guy, the DBA, was questioning the schedule, trying to tell everyone that a database migration was not a simple little project. But, as usual, the problem was political. The team had been put in a position that if the company didn't win the contract, there would be no work for them and they would be let go. So of course they massively underestimated the work and ignored the contrarian. Better to get 12 more weeks of pay than 0 more weeks. If the company thought these barely capable code monkeys were going to be selfless in a situation like that, they were hallucinating. The company lost a bundle. The customer got one hell of a deal, and was still unhappy, with some justification as they had been basically promised the moon and told that despite their doubts we could deliver because we were the experts and they weren't.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    122. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, 50k a year is shit fucking pay! Do you live in Malaysia or something?

      Do you understand how much cost of living in regions factors in to your pay? A Sys Admin in Chicago could be making 65-70 a year while that same position in say Fort Collins Colorado would probably pay you 55-60 a year.

    123. Re:IT admins are special by TCiecka · · Score: 1

      I really appreciate this comment. Thank you.

    124. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem! We, the women in IT are quite used to condecending a-holes. And btw, you're probably no Cillian Murphy or Christian Bale yourself either, I'm sure..

    125. Re:IT admins are special by Synerg1y · · Score: 1

      I know you are, doesn't stop you from trying to strike it rich w a sexual harassment suit though. And compared to most women in IT that I know, in comparison I look like Matt Daemon and behave like Gandhi.

      You know... if you don't like the culture you can always start your own gig.

      I don't like the culture from either sex, so maybe I'm being a bit narcissistic, thankfully this is a community that's a shadow of what it once was, so I could care less.

    126. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of Accellion.

    127. Re:IT admins are special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it is. The problems are completely different when you have money. Poor Johnny might have to go hungry to feed his new baby. Rich Johnny just pays the girl off and moves on.

    128. Re:IT admins are special by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      You don't 'smile' at work unless you are a clown, and even then its usually just the makeup.

      I dunno - I smile when I can identify and fix something in less than a day that others have banged their heads against for months. It's the thrill of the hunt, and why I actually love doing the admin thing.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    129. Re:IT admins are special by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Same story here.

      My idea of stress only starts when, say, the Oracle DBA wails "...ohshitohshitohshit! Hey Guys? I umm, I need some help here... GUYS!?" ...and that's only because I know that the little fucker is going to blame OS/SAN/Mercury-in-retrograde/anything-but-the-malformed-ASM-command-he-issued-as-grid for the resulting explosion.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  2. Lying liars and the lies they lie about by ZaMoose · · Score: 5, Informative

    Only 73% have considered quitting? The other 27% are lying to you, probably because they're worried that the survey is being snooped on by the corporate Barracuda firewall.

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    1. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      No. They're just developers. They're not stressed as much because they don't have to carry a production pager or respond when their code blows up in the wee hours of the night.

      Not all of IT is on call.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other 27% are in upper management - probably playing golf.

    3. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "probably because they're worried that the survey is being snooped on by the corporate Barracuda firewall."

      Not "probably" but definitely....

      I could tell you stories about supposedly anonymous surveys. Just a heads up. The are never anonymous if they are done on-line!

    4. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 73% have considered quitting? The other 27% are lying to you, probably because they're worried that the survey is being snooped on by the corporate Barracuda firewall.

      This. Although, I would turn that on it's head. If they answer "no my job isnt stressful" then their ass is grass. If you aren't stressed out at least some of the time, the bottom line is you aren't working hard enough. If you, for some reason, have never thought about quitting, we are clearly paying you too much. Go re-apply and we will find you a wage that better balances your need to eat with our need to exploit our workers.

      Sincerely,

      Your boss

    5. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i think 73% are just having a whinge

      it would be a typical figure in any industry

      if it was the number of IT professionals that have actually quit (not just having considered quitting) due to stress, then you might have a story

      also, if IT professionals think they have it hard, have a look at these guys...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFe-nJtiByM

    6. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by osu-neko · · Score: 4, Funny

      No. They're just developers. They're not stressed as much because they don't have to carry a production pager or respond when their code blows up in the wee hours of the night.

      That depends on the developer... I've gotten midnight calls before. Granted, my boss was insane. He'd call me in the middle of the night to discuss an idea he just had to discuss for the project... I compiled sufficient evidence to support the theory that the man does not, in fact, sleep. At all, ever. I've seen him during daylight, though, even in direct sunlight, and he seemed perfectly okay with it (unlike me, I sunburn in approximately 15 seconds). He got annoyed when I stopped answering the phone in the middle of the night. "What if it's an emergency?", he asked. I told him if it was an emergency, call 911. I'm incapable of handling emergencies, I can only fix bugs and computer problems, and since our computers aren't running life support equipment, my software can all blow up, crash, and cause the servers to explode, but unless someone is in the room and severely injured by the explosion, this does not constitute an emergency, and if that does happen, I'm the last person you want trying to perform life-saving surgery to remove shrapnel.

      I don't work there anymore...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    7. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May be the other 27% are lying in a hospital bed after a heart atack !

    8. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      That's definitely not true.

    9. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 73% have considered quitting? The other 27% are lying to you, probably because they're worried that the survey is being snooped on by the corporate Barracuda firewall.

      This. I'm quitting because the asshats have decided to start drug testing. I don't do drugs, but I'll be goddamned if I'm going to put up with a packet sniffer being installed between my wang and my toilet.

    10. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by chispito · · Score: 1

      No. They're just developers. They're not stressed as much because they don't have to carry a production pager or respond when their code blows up in the wee hours of the night.

      Not all of IT is on call.

      That word "admin," I do not think it means what you think it means.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    11. Re:Lying liars and the lies they lie about by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      That depends. Work in a small enough shop and "developer" also includes things like tier 2 tech support (with tier 1 being the sales guy) and making sure the server works properly, even if it's a hosted server and you don't even have shell access. This is even more fun if it's your first actual tech job and you have zero experience in everything.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  3. And then what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quit and do what, it's the same everywhere.
    You just have to train those managers well and stick with it!

  4. This just in by mwfischer · · Score: 1

    This just in "Do more with less and stay longer" causes emotional and psychological distress.

    Film at 6 but it will actually take until like 11:30.

    1. Re:This just in by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, we're going to address your health concerns by outsourcing your job and your entire division ant a third the cost.

    2. Re:This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, we're going to address your health concerns by outsourcing your job and your entire division ant a third the cost.

      Awesome. Then I can get hired back as a consultant to fix the problems at double my previous salary. :)

    3. Re:This just in by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      1/3 not because of cheap labor, but because they don't have any problems sourcing tools..

    4. Re:This just in by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      ... Only to later hire you and your division back as 'consultants,' at double the standard rate, once we realize that a call center in India can't do shit about a broken fiber link on the local campus.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    5. Re:This just in by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a good friend and database analyst who lost her job at an insurance company after a couple decades of work there because they decided to outsource the job to IBM. A week later, she was back doing the exact same job, but as an IBM employee getting paid much more for the exact same job.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    6. Re:This just in by mwfischer · · Score: 1

      See. No one really knows how insurance or insurance companies work.

    7. Re:This just in by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      He's lucky.

      What about the guy that gets to stay and fix all the outsourced crap?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  5. I used to share office with some sysadmins by staltz · · Score: 1

    I used to share office with some sysadmins. They were constantly swearing because of people and machines. I guess neither of these two functioned well, and these guys had to take the responsibility of the problems.

    1. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by Stratus311 · · Score: 2

      This is what we do all day. We're a 3 person shop and have some of the most clueless users I've had the misfortune of dealing with. Not that I expect them to know much of anything on how a PC works but I do expect them to know how to change their own batteries in their wireless mice before submitting a ticket. Don't get me wrong, I'll take the ticket credit because it looks good in the reports, but FFS!

      And because this is Slashdot, I present you with a car analogy: Do you call a mechanic every time your car runs out of gas?!

      Oh, and in Soviet Russia, stress quits you!!!

    2. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      I really hate the ticket/metric system. Its designed pretty much to determine at what exact point they can do with one less person.

      --
      Good-bye
    3. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by crutchy · · Score: 1

      car analogy reply: no, they make a gas meter and the process of filling the tank simple enough for anyone to be able to do.

      i think the real problem is that too many IT admins suffer from a god complex... they don't understand the user, what they require to do their job or that often the procedural and functional "controls" that IT admins enforce are often part of the problem.

      in terms of company finances, IT admins are in most cases an essential expense, but they are also an overhead expense; IT admins aren't the breadwinners of a company. their purpose is to keep IT infrastructure operating so that others can do the work that makes money for the company. unfortunately this reality doesn't fit well with the god complex model within IT departments.

      there is no doubt undue stress heaped on IT admins when things go wrong, similarly to airline pilots, but like airline pilots, IT admins earn their keep when the shit hits the fan because when things are running normally they are there to monitor and plan. perhaps like airline pilots, IT admins need to focus their training on dealing with the problems they get paid for rather than spending the time whinging about users.

    4. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by ravenlord_hun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you break your car too badly the mechanic might tell you it's beyond repair and send you away. IT admins can't say that. Most users demand EVERYTHING, even when they are too clueless to find MS Word when they accidentally drag the icon from the desktop into a folder.

      "God complex" is really justified when most of the idiots on the system can easily cause significant problems, which are then blamed onto the IT because "it's the software that's broken!" The users are never at fault.

    5. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      IT users are the ultimate proof of "a little knowledge is a dangerous thing".

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    6. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by Spicerun · · Score: 1

      ......
      "God complex" is really justified when most of the idiots on the system can easily cause significant problems, which are then blamed onto the IT because "it's the software that's broken!" The users are never at fault.

      So why is it that the users doing their work on the system that (for which they are blamed when they don't get their work done) cause the significant problems, according to the "God complex" Administrators? Why is it that the only system problems is the work that the users must do?

    7. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by rasjani · · Score: 1

      And ideas like that are the root cause why it sucks to be sysadmin.

      I do understand your rationale but its just not valid in every case. Continuing with car analogy: if your rear mirror breaks or run out of gas, you wont just buy a new car because after a while, you don't have any more money left.. Your daily life revolves with so many admins jobs that its just bullshit to say that they are not part of equation for making things happen in the world.. Consider how many sysadmins work is even in your direct route when you made that post: Isp's, possibly your company's, how about those who maintained ordering system where net gear was purchased. Banks where money was transferred to buy those good, paying salaries.. Admins who keep /. running. Sure, world would survive without admins but what kind of world would be.

      Admins are enablers for Your Work....

      --
      yush
    8. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by div_2n · · Score: 1

      I've found that USUALLY if I tell users WHAT happened (i.e. the icon got moved to a folder) without saying they did it, they usually ask "well how would that happen?" knowing full well it was probably them but hoping there's a random bug that caused it, they usually don't push back when I say "you most likely accidentally did it while doing something else".

      Not being confrontational and avoiding aggressive phrases using the word "you" in it, then in my experience users are very receptive to learning what they did wrong so that they can be proactive in trying not to do it again.

      Aggressive: You moved the icon to a folder.
      Non-aggressive: The icon got moved to a folder.
      Non-aggressive follow up at request of user: You most likely accidentally moved it ...

    9. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by airdweller · · Score: 1

      "in terms of company finances, IT admins are in most cases an essential expense, but they are also an overhead expense; IT admins aren't the breadwinners of a company. their purpose is to keep IT infrastructure operating so that others can do the work that makes money for the company. unfortunately this reality doesn't fit well with the god complex model within IT departments."

      I'd say you don't understand very well how to run a business. If it wasn't for the " IT infrastructure", the companies would have to spend a lot more on what they now take for granted, which would mean lower revenues. So, yes, IT are also "breadwinners". The same way as finance, accounting, management, etc. are.

    10. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      I do expect them to know how to change their own batteries in their wireless mice before submitting a ticket.

      Do they have access to batteries? Or does IT keep them to themselves, where the only way to get them is to submit a ticket?

      P.S. Why do you have them use wireless mice in the first place, when wires seem to work fine?

      --
      That is all.
    11. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by Stratus311 · · Score: 1

      Our IT group does not keep batteries. We have a small supply room in our company where they get everything they need for their daily jobs, including paper, pens, batteries, etc.

      Trust me, if I could convince them that wired mice are just fine for their jobs instead of wasting money on batteries for wireless mice, I would. It's an entitlement issue.

    12. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by ravenlord_hun · · Score: 1

      Issues are usually caused by lack of training, faulty assumptions and generally being absolutely clueless as to how the systems they are interacting with works. Trained personnel are much less problematic. Want to guess the percentage of the users who received formal training for computers, let alone the specific systems?

    13. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by ravenlord_hun · · Score: 1

      Gotta agree there. The way you communicate with the users actually is pretty damn important. But I think that's a corporate culture thing. If the users actually listen to the IT and IT isn't being a total prick, it can work out pretty well.

      The thing is, that's kind of rare. Users are often repeating the same behavour over and over - and it gets aggrevating really quick. "Don't copy all your junk onto the production system share, you are only meant to store critical project data there." Then tomorrow, the drive is 98% full again, and not filled with mission critical data either. Most you can do is complain at your manager, who - chances are - will not do anything, because being "confrontational" will hinder his career. Then... what?

    14. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by crutchy · · Score: 1

      admins are the enablers of work, but they aren't the doers of work

      all business overheads are essential, otherwise they wouldn't be worth investing in, but they are overheads nonetheless, and overheads don't bring in cash

      are they as important as anyone else in a business? sure they are, but that doesn't justify the god complex

      the whole "users are stupid" mentality is part of the reason why IT admins cop so much abuse from users, and also why many small businesses are happy to farm out the IT stuff to consultants so as to avoid having to hire IT admins full time

      not saying that they are the only ones, but too many IT admins are power tripping jerk offs

    15. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by crutchy · · Score: 1

      you don't understand the definition of "overhead"

      have a read...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overhead_(business)

      even in software development companies only the software developers themselves are the breadwinners

      IT administrators are an essential expense, but they aren't breadwinners, and attitudes like yours are the reason why the god complex in IT administration is perpetuated

      if IT admins considered themselves as being on the same level as the users they support (as colleagues), rather than putting themselves on pedestals (as if having "admin privileges" actually means anything) they would probably get along with people better and endure less stress. if admins continue to talk down to users and treat them like criminals intent on destroying the universe, users will simply ignore admins and repeat the same mistakes just out of spite.

    16. Re:I used to share office with some sysadmins by airdweller · · Score: 1

      You didn't get it. Please read again.

  6. Rapid change in IT is the problem by Spy+Handler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When IT and computer/internet field in general settle down and become mature, things will get better.

    Right now there's just too many new technolgies and buzzwords and platforms and architecture and paradigms popping up, and pointy-haired managers and VPs all want to implement this and that and oh by the way make it work with our legacy system and nothing better get lost or you're fired.

    1. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by tokencode · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In IT the only constant is change.

    2. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Yold · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not a matter of maturity. Many organizations hide behind the disclaimer "we are not an I.T. company", despite having sizable I.T. departments. And despite having this sizable department, which offers mission-critical applications and infrastructure, zero effort is made towards working smarter. Problems are fixed with mandatory overtime, cutting staffing/costs, and "quick-and-dirty" fixes to long standing problems.

      I think some companies are starting to understand that their project management methodologies are flawed, but most cannot connect the concepts of "software debt" to decreasing marginal output in their I.T. efforts. An hour of work today is less effective than in the past because you are paying "interest" on your previous bad decisions.

      I think that the 27% is reflective of companies that can connect the longevity and cost-effectiveness of I.T. systems to proper project planning, management, and I.T. expertise. Whether or not this is an upper-bound remains to be seen, because a lot of organizations simply don't understand that inventing your own project management ideas dooms you to repeating the same failures that have happened over the last 50 years.

    3. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      That's because the field is young and dissemination of information is still sub-optimal. Give it a century or two, and the basic stuff will be as simple and standardized as elementary, high-school and undergraduate mathematics. (As in, no one reinvents the notation there, once it got stabilized over the centuries.)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by tokencode · · Score: 1

      Given that information is key to all other advances and its nature and quantity is always changing, so too will the technology used to make sense of it all. While what we have today might become mundane, demands on information technology will also increase. IT will always be in a state of flux.

    5. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      There are things that change (mostly the "how"-things) and things that remain static (mostly the "what"-things). Pythagoras' theorem is still the same, despite the fact that a long time ago, we were writing stuff down on paper and now we use pocket calculators and what not. There are basic patterns in all computational machinery (be it tangible, like transistors and circuits, or intangible, like subroutines and programs) that fall out naturally. One day, people will simply abstract the changing stuff away. It's inevitable, since I don't see any way of following the current trend long-term without the whole structure falling apart. Hail VPRI.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    6. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by aergern · · Score: 2

      Are you kidding? I've been in this field for the last 20 years .. it's always been like this. It has always been stressful and always full of all the things you name off. I guess you're a recent graduate? ;)

      --
      Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
    7. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard IBM is about to introduce a new line of boxen called the 360, which should settle things down a great deal. Then maybe everyone can learn how to do our jobs well.

    8. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      That's because the field is young and dissemination of information is still sub-optimal. Give it a century or two, and the basic stuff will be as simple and standardized as elementary, high-school and undergraduate mathematics. (As in, no one reinvents the notation there, once it got stabilized over the centuries.)

      If I am still doing this job in a century, kill me. (because we have invented some sort of immortality technique and the only way people can die is non-naturally)

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    9. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by nine-times · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It is strange, when you think about it, the way that the IT department tends to get segregated off from the rest of operations. You have companies where people do 100% of their work on a computer, where the company *can not function* when the Internet goes out, and yet IT is treated as an afterthought. The people running these companies think that running an IT department is as easy as "running out to Best Buy and picking up a computer," and then they get annoyed when their IT services are unreliable.

      I would have thought that, with as ubiquitous as computers are in business, IT work would be considered valuable. It's as though you have a company that ships things across the country by truck, but they don't think their mechanics are important, and they freak out when the mechanics want to have proper equipment for fixing the trucks. And worse, they don't think any of their truck drivers need to know how to drive. When their drivers put the truck in a ditch, they complain that the mechanics haven't made the truck crash-proof.

    10. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by starfishsystems · · Score: 2

      An hour of work today is less effective than in the past because you are paying "interest" on your previous bad decisions.

      Well said. And bad decisions when integrating complex systems build compound interest. One staffer goes in and hacks some config file as a workaround to something that really should be fixed properly. Before he can fix it properly, he's off putting out another fire somewhere. By the time the next staffer gets asked to straighten out the accumulated mess in the config file, the reason for half of the workarounds is no longer clear. You don't dare touch them, so you end up working around the workarounds.

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    11. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interest = Inflation + Risk + Margin.

      All companies have debt; to investors, to management, to employee's, to stockholders, to bankers. They set the interest level they find acceptable, and you get to perform to that level by controlling all 3 items in that equation.

      GDP, Ex Debt, has remained constant for the last 30 years; that represents increasing inflation for that formula.

      Margin thus, is squeezed until you've got to eat, and you begin increasing risk.

      Risk increases when you do things like asset strip employee's; e.g. college graduate comes to work. No Training (or time provided to self-train), no reward for maintaining education, 60hr work weeks. By the 5th year your bring in a contractor to replace your archaic malformed system with something new, and the now jobless graduate can't find a job because they don't have the new skills. Then you complain when there isn't a fresh supply of cheap intelligent laborers so you do the next best thing; outsource, show management a pretty graph, and lose money like hell but it's off sheet, and keep your job for another 2-3 years.

      When Lack of Education and Lack of Critical thinking intersect, the result is the individual learning expensive lessons at the companies expense. If you invest in training, the result may be waste if they find a job elsewhere, or it may be a reward if they recognize the rarity of such a thing and stay. If you don't, you pay for the mistakes, and are guaranteed nothing in return.

      Being over-productive and innovative is a great way to get yourself fired in korporate amercia these days; if you're especially efficient and through no fault of your own get egg on some important individuals face, they will attack you. If you deliver real cost savings, and you do that consistently, you will never be rewarded for it and doing so, because of the previous sentence, is a risk. The majority of Sysadmins don't maintain their certifications and work 60 hour weeks, the fantastic ones work 35 hour weeks and spend the other 5-10 educating themselves.

      All Capitalist Societies gravitate towards Tyranny because all services and products are a function of labor, and the cheapest way to reduce the cost of a product or service and improve marketability is, has, and always will be slavery in its many forms. When no cost is placed on labor, no effort is expended on eliminating it, thus innovation simply does not occur. Remove the OT Exemption for IT engineers from the FLSA, I will guarantee you that will bankrupt the corrupt and transform the project management methodology for most companies overnight. Enforce existing laws pertaining to finance and put the corrupt in jail where they belong, and you might just see the interest expectation come down some enabling apropos investment.

    12. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by starfishsystems · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Interesting. I've been in IT and software development for the past 35 years. At the expert end, it was a fantastic field to be in, especially with the advent of graphical Unix workstations and widespread use of NSFnet. Equipment and software was interesting and sufficiently expensive to justify reasonable IT salary levels to integrate it and take care of it all.

      I saw the real breakdown beginning, oh, just about exactly 20 years ago. Windows 3.X. It was crap, and we laughed at it. But businesses bought into it at a faster rate, and were more thoroughly locked into their decision, than we had ever experienced in the scientific/engineering community. Expectations of it were completely unrealistic and driven by desperation, which management downloaded onto the IT staff.

      Public perception of IT shifted from respect for expertise to open disdain. Why? As long as graphics workstations were being used within an expert community, the respect for expertise was natural. It's easy for one engineer to recognize the worth of another. But once any consumer could go out and purchase what looked at least superficially like the same thing, and twiddle on it, it would be easy to assume out of simple ignorance that all the so-called IT experts were just twiddling too.

      --
      Parity: What to do when the weekend comes.
    13. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Problems are fixed with mandatory overtime, cutting staffing/costs, and "quick-and-dirty" fixes to long standing problems.

      I blame the people who call themselves "engineers," yet refuse to implement any professional certification or accreditation standards, along with the professional ethical standards that come with it.

      A civil engineer told to "build this bridge on the cheap - cut corners & costs wherever possible," would be in violation of his *ethical professional obligations* and would be well within his rights to refuse, and whistleblow. He would also have a professional organization that would support him in doing so.

      Software "engineers" whine about being told to cut corners in ways that are dangerous and counterproductive, and yet they don't do the most obvious thing in the world when told to do something stupid: produce a business case explaining WHY and HOW the request is wasteful, dangerous, and counterproductive, and offer REAL, workable solutions that can still meet the business' goals while maintaining standards of safety and reliability. And spare me the shit about "management demands X, I have to give them X." It's trivially obvious that you can demonstrate a long-term maintenance cost associated with "doing X," or you wouldn't be whining about it.

      Software "engineers" delight in showing off their clever hacks and corner-cutting techniques, and then cry when management demands that they come up with more clever new hacks and corner cutting techniques.

      Until that changes, guess what? Status quo. If your response to management's ridiculous demands is "yes sir, yes sir, three bags full, thank you may I have another," then your suffering is of your own design - you agree to their demands, and then whine helplessly when your own shitty designs bite you in the ass.

    14. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      The nature of IT is to automate anything remotely unchanging.
      If IT no longer changes, IT itself is no longer needed.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    15. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by s73v3r · · Score: 2

      Because "meeting the business needs" usually means "having it done yesterday" and having it done cheaper.

    16. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but that's not going to happen.

      For one, change happens. With change comes snakeoil salesmen and people trying to hawk shit, under-equipped products for huge sums of money (Fortigate and Sonicwall come to mind, though Sonicwall is massively better than they used to be). Hell, even Cisco gets in this game, changing things up every once in a while just to stay 'relevant' with new certifications.

      Paradigms? No, nothing has changed. It's the same it's always been, just encapsulated (virtualization, cloud this and that, etc.). You just have marketing bullshit, like you always have, and managers and supervisors who gobble it up. Same for buzzwords.

      New platforms? It's your fault, or your manager's fault, for adopting something you can't effectively support. There isn't necessarily anything wrong with new platforms, but if it fits a 'paradigm' and that's why it was adopted, then it most certainly is your fault.

      New architectures? If that's a problem for you, find a different career. This doesn't complicate things, it makes things easier (barring too many paradigms, of course).

      In essence, what you're saying is we need to get the business and sales types out of IT. In my experience, the best run networks are "buzzword free" - people have tools delivered to them that they need, and people don't just get every whim honored. The person in charge of IT decisions is respected, because things really do just work. No, they may not be flashy and new, but they work. "The network is offline" doesn't happen, because things are planned and tested prior to production. (Yes, there are always gotchas, but in those cases people tend to be fairly understanding unless they're being unrealistic.)

      IT systems people are like high tech janitors, electricians, and general contractors all in one. GCs, electricians, and even janitors have standards by which they work: "no, I can't do that, it's against code" or "that will cause safety problems". People listen to them because they're typically right about their domain - as are IT types, if they're not business/sales type managers. But more likely than not, if they're not in the business/sales mentality, then they haven't got any balls (myself often included, unfortunately - herd mentality and negative social influence are bad).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    17. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      My favorite thing about IT is getting a position where the employer knows things are falling apart around them. They don't have a preconception about "just keeping things running" - thijngs have been increasingly unworkable for some time. You get to go in there and basically cut off the fat. One of the last positions I had was such a position: I reduced the physical server count by half, most of which were simply turned off, and many were virtualized. Network infrastructure (as well as 10+ years of bad racking and cabling) was redone in a mad dash during a massive power outage that had a known 'fix by' date, working by flashlight and diesel generator.

      The results were appreciable. They were able to have half-assed monkeys run the show for years afterwards without serious mishap, whereas prior to my arrival they'd been having serious problems almost daily. (And, no, it wasn't just me being awesome and slash/burning things, I had a lackey and another competent admin to help).

      No, they're not long term positions (because you get bored and work yourself out of a job), but they're seriously rewarding.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    18. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by lightknight · · Score: 1

      That's easy to understand. They're scared of IT. They don't understand it, and it seems to be everywhere; the best they can do is try to contain it, and hold onto their illusory power bases (if IT doesn't know the magic way we do things in our department, we can't be outsourced / downsized; hell, if we ask for 't3H cL0uD,' we can turn the tables on IT, and outsource them!). They are ill equipped to understand that it's not IT versus the rest of the company and its little departments ala standard company politics, but this company versus the company across the street that has a non-retarded staff that has integrated IT into all of its operations, and is busy running this company out of the business.

      This is a serious problem with American businesses, IMHO. Now, a lot of Asian businesses...well, they've been steadily gearing up to clean our clocks. And you'll notice that the "Buy American!" ad campaigns aren't really effective...you can see where American business is headed. While you were engaging in petty internal squabbles over fiefdoms owned by no one, and Wall St. was busy playing its mad games with the currency, other places were watching us, and learning from our mistakes. When they can do everyone else's job 100 times faster for 10 times less...well, your time is up.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    19. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Which means harassing the employees about getting things done faster (thus preventing them from doing so), and failing to strategize properly.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    20. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Fierlo · · Score: 1
      In my company, they are going the other way. I can only imagine they are giving in too much to IT.

      In a company of about 10,000, they are insisting that everyone cuts back to 500 MB (1 GB for managers) for their e-mail accounts. There were zero limits in place before (which was a mistake on their part).

      Oh, and they gave people two months (when the company is being restructured) to clean up their accounts. Many people have 10+ GB of e-mail. This is an electrical utility with lots of engineers. Some of the information should probably be stored elsewhere, but sometimes, it is just damn convenient to look up the answer to a question you've been posed before.

      And, if you've got a few thousand engineering types... how much money do you save on IT vs. how much is spent managing that cap number? They never did release the projected savings... probably so people couldn't question them vs. the increased cost to every other part of the organization.

    21. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Fierlo · · Score: 1
      I think my company treats IT well... however they are now insisting that 500 MB is an appropriate limit for everyone's e-mail accounts. I'm pretty sure that employees who have been there for 15+ years have far more than 500 MB, and the cost of having them parse their old e-mails (by June) is far more than the savings of a few hundred GB in storage.

      Even better, they implemented (in Jan 2012) some McAfee archive storage (or maybe it was a different company) that archived e-mails over a certain size.

      In Feb 2013, as part of the e-mail quotas, it was announced that all archived e-mail would be deleted (and wasn't included in the size of your quota, so you never really knew how much was left to delete). Oh, and they wouldn't unarchive your e-mails in bulk either.

      This is why people hate IT. And more specifically, IT Management.

    22. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is strange, when you think about it, the way that the IT department tends to get segregated off from the rest of operations. You have companies where people do 100% of their work on a computer, where the company *can not function* when the Internet goes out, and yet IT is treated as an afterthought. The people running these companies think that running an IT department is as easy as "running out to Best Buy and picking up a computer," and then they get annoyed when their IT services are unreliable.

      That's because it should be, and will be, after the field matures. Most computers are used as glorified typewriters and calculators, there is no reason they shouldn't "just work".

      I would have thought that, with as ubiquitous as computers are in business, IT work would be considered valuable. It's as though you have a company that ships things across the country by truck, but they don't think their mechanics are important, and they freak out when the mechanics want to have proper equipment for fixing the trucks. And worse, they don't think any of their truck drivers need to know how to drive. When their drivers put the truck in a ditch, they complain that the mechanics haven't made the truck crash-proof.

      Some drivers do break trucks more than others. Mechanics are simple folks, just like it staff. They will cry whatever you do. There are always better tools available, but they might not be the most cost effective.

    23. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because, on paper, IT doesn't make money, it just spends it. On top of that, when money is spent on it, there isn't always a visual effect.

      It's almost impossible to produce results like "Our tech optimized the computer, making the user 12% more productive and increasing revenue by $1,287 per month."

    24. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't closing the loop. A lot those twiddlers thought "hey this isn't so hard" and ran out and got jobs in IT.

    25. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's just stupid. Having a 500MB-1GB mailbox isn't too unreasonable *if* you also provide an archive for all the old email that will need to be deleted to get below that limit.

    26. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Cloud Cloud Cloud Cloud Cloud Cloud Cloud Cloud Cloud.....that is all managers hear! They hear it get painted in nice sparkles by marketing people and people like Leo Laporte and they thing we gotta have this shit. Then they have no fscking clue why their favorite website went down when the whole fsking thing is running on Amazon's EC3. Stupid.

      --

      Gorkman

    27. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      That's a load of crap. Been working in IT for 16+ years....and in those 16 years it's completely changed. In the next 16 years it will all change again. Laptops and Desktops will be replaced by Virtualdesktops and that will only be for a short time(next 5 years...maybe). The IT industry isn't looking for stability....it's looking to change the world constantly. It will never mature as we have an all encompassing thirst to make things easier.

      --

      Gorkman

    28. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Good analogy here!

      --

      Gorkman

    29. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      This is DAMN insightful. The business units OFTEN want something but have no idea how to articulate what they want it to DO or what they want to DO with it. They also want it installed yesterday because it might MAGICALLY solve all of the fraud issues....SUUUURE it will.

      --

      Gorkman

    30. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      That's because the field is young and dissemination of information is still sub-optimal.

      Algorithmic calculation has been around for 3000 or so years. The idea of automated calculators for 200 or so. The actual mechanical calculator for about a century. The physical implementation of automated calculators for 70 years. The notion of a programming language (and their use) for 60. What more time do we need?

      It would be different if there had actually been progress in the art of programming over the last few decades. In reality, most of the programming tools and facilities we had today were available 40 years ago and things have not actually advanced much since then. Our industry does churn for the sake of ego and NIH and then we are surprised when nothing gets easier or better in other ways.

      Yes, I'd like my saying this to people over and over to be a wake-up call. However, most are more likely to scream "Rails", "Clojure", "LINQ", "social media", etc., etc., etc., and be distracted by the shiny of the moment, which doesn't actually make any significant change in the ease with which we create software.

      --
      That is all.
    31. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Well, that's why I place my hopes with the VPRI efforts. Sometimes you just have to "burn the diskpacks"and return to first principles to change things.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    32. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It's almost impossible to produce results like "Our tech optimized the computer, making the user 12% more productive and increasing revenue by $1,287 per month."

      It's difficult/impossible to *measure* those kinds of results, but it's not impossible to produce those results. If IT isn't making money on paper, that's an problem of accounting not reflecting reality. If your business is using computers to make money, then IT is making money.

    33. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by nine-times · · Score: 1

      That's because it should be, and will be, after the field matures. Most computers are used as glorified typewriters and calculators, there is no reason they shouldn't "just work".

      Sure. And accountants just collect receipts. And salespeople just tell customers about your products. When you think about things this way, nobody does real work.

      But when you understand any of these jobs, you realize there's a lot more to it. Believe me, if all businesses were using was word processors and spreadsheets, then IT would be really easy. In my experience, even the person running a company is likely to underestimate the complexity of what they're doing on computers.

      The problem is, you'll talk to the GM of a company, and they'll say, "Oh, we're just using Microsoft Office. We have a bunch of servers, but I don't even know what they do."

      You start to show them what's going on with those servers, and suddenly it's like, "Oh, right. We do run several custom-build business-critical applications that haven't been updated in 10 years. But you don't need to worry about it. They work fine."

      Then you start to support that client, and suddenly it's like, "Oh, right. We have constant problems with those custom-built business-critical applications that haven't been updated in 10 years. I forgot about all the problems we have. But you can just fix those, right? Can't you, like, put it in the cloud? I hear the cloud fixes everything." And there's approximately zero documentation.

      No, sorry, this stuff isn't simple, and it's not "glorified typewriters and calculators". Your mom might just be using her computer to play solitaire, but lots of businesses are using them for real stuff.

      Some drivers do break trucks more than others. Mechanics are simple folks, just like it staff. They will cry whatever you do.

      Yeah, so I'm guessing that, not only are you not in IT and not in trucking, but you've never actually run a business.

    34. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best car analogy ever. Saved.

    35. Re:Rapid change in IT is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that an engineer designing a bridge doesn't have the same pressures? Cry me a river.

      If you have never learned to manage the expectations of your managers, co-workers, and customers - now would be an EXCELLENT time to start.

      If your manager came into your cube and told you, "Flap your arms and fly!" it's not your job to start flapping your arms - it's your job to make him understand that what he's requested is impossible, but that you could build him a very workable glider in X time for Y dollars, or a luxury Gulfstream for 10X time and 10Y dollars, or you could give him a parachute today, which would at least keep him from splattering on the ground, and that will give you enough time and breathing room to build that glider, or a small plane, or a Gulfstream, instead - which will allow him to fly.

      Seriously, if you treat every whim of your manager as if it's a command, it's no wonder you're so miserable. Have some faith in your OWN abilities and OWN knowledge, and learn how to tell your manager that what he's asked for is impossible, while simultaneously offering him 2 or 3 reasonable and deliverable alternatives. And never, ever commit to a date without thinking about the problem and doing some rough estimating.

  7. Water is wet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sky is blue.

  8. Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by meatspray · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Picking your boss. If you're not up a creek looking for work, that interview is to let you meet your managers, talk to some workers about the managers.

    When I started working it was "If I can just get in the door"

    When I was in my 20's it was "What cool things will this job do for me"

    Now That i'm in my 30's its "Will I be able to work with these people"

    1. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      With ya on that; I recently turned down a job that pays $10K/yr more than my current position, because during the interview they actually had the audacity to ask me about my religion. I figure, if they're going to blatantly flaunt the law and violate my privacy during the interview, chances are they aren't a group of people I want to associate with.

      Yes, contrary to popular belief, there's more to a job than pay.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    2. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Management" as being the worst part of I.T. fits right into my career experience.

      I've worked providing computer resources to non-technical (or at least not technical in computer areas) people during my career, and I have had a number of bosses who just would not listen. Some of it was that computer work was so outside their experience that it was magic, and if something is "magic" it takes no time or money to do. Users and management see too much stuff in I.T. as nothing more than flipping a switch because of their low knowledge level.

      For other bosses it was a more fundamental problem that's seen everywhere: management not listening to an expert when he/she says something they don't like.

      My advice to managers of all sorts: you should choose between two states with experts: trust the person you hire and listen to what he/she says or get rid of that expert. There should be nothing in the middle. You are going to lose those experts if you constantly second guess them or force them into situations that they have told you are not sustainable. Learn to listen.

    4. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by tokencode · · Score: 1

      What? Tell them you want 2x what you were looking for and when they don't hire you, sue them for discrimination.

    5. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by compro01 · · Score: 1

      It's "flout the law", not flaunt.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    6. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking, asking about your religion is not illegal. It makes a huge dent in their legal armor if they dont hire you, but the act in and of itself is legal.

      --
      Good-bye
    7. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you're in your 50s its "Will I be able to avoid being put on the layoff list, since I'll never be hired again in this industry due to my age, and I have to cling to this job until I can retire."

    8. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seems like a great way to make enemies.

    9. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

      What? Tell them you want 2x what you were looking for and when they don't hire you, sue them for discrimination.

      Yea, sure, and how exactly am I supposed to prove that they said something discriminatory, when the only people in the room were myself and the idiots I would be suing?

      Take it from someone who knows, via personal experience - without solid evidence, discrimination lawsuits are a complete waste of time and money.

      In hindsight, I should have recorded the conversation (I live in a "Single-party consent" state). Lesson learned.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    10. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking, asking about your religion is not illegal.

      True, it's not technically illegal - just very, very stupid.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    11. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Picking your boss. If you're not up a creek looking for work, that interview is to let you meet your managers, talk to some workers about the managers.

      When I started working it was "If I can just get in the door"

      When I was in my 20's it was "What cool things will this job do for me"

      Now That i'm in my 30's its "Will I be able to work with these people"

      Now that I'm in my 40's, it's "fuck that, I work for no one." I like being my own boss. I'm a lousy boss, though. You would not believe what I let myself get away with on the job...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    12. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by evil_aaronm · · Score: 2

      Roger that. At my last job, at a large multi-national working on medical diagnostics, I worked for a couple of years for a woman with whom I got along well enough. Then, she moved to a different group and a raging asshole took over - the kind that would literally look over your shoulder and tell you what to type, or holler at you in team meetings, or lie about what was in the actual scope of the upcoming release so he'd get us to do additional things that would make him look good, but cause us to work extra hours. Late one night, working on another impossible deadline, I got a blurry spot in my right eye but thought it was dirty contacts. Long story short, after seeing various eye doctors, I learned I'd burst a vessel in my retina (BRVO) and the blood was clouding my vision. This happens more often in older folks, but relatively rarely in younger people: I was like an infant compared to the majority of the folks in the waiting room. The treatment for it is direct injections into the eye, every six weeks or so. Yeah, lots of fun. I saved up enough to allow me to quit and coast for a while - it's been 8 months, so far - and at my last retinal specialist visit, the eye was good enough I didn't need an injection. Gee, I didn't have this problem before working for that raging asshole, and it's healed after I stopped working for him. S'pose there's direct correlation, there?

    13. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Now that I'm in my 60's its "Does this pay more than Social Security?" and "Why can't you drink on the job any more?"

    14. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      When you're in your 50s its "Will I be able to avoid being put on the layoff list, since I'll never be hired again in this industry due to my age, and I have to cling to this job until I can retire."

      I'm in my 50s, you inconsiderate clod!

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    15. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      It's "flout the law", not flaunt.

      We flout it; cops and prosecutors flaunt it. :p

    16. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by sliderr · · Score: 1

      Spot on.

      And the prevailing attitude in the last couple of contracts I've had was that everything just works out of the box and requires no engineering or real lab environment. Also an unwillingness to change a deadline because of some promise they made higher up the chain without clearing it with someone technical first.

    17. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding a Boss not listening to an expert saying the inonvenient truth.

      I have been there. It's bad when it's a surgeon with agod complex who is also arguably not mentally stable. I inherited a problem that had been horifically mismanaged by my direct report several times, several layers deep. In spite of this I tracked the cause down and it turns out the one piece of bloat ware the idiot insisted they and everyone else use was tanking the bandwidth and creating the issue, but the direct report was a coward and the boss didnt want to hear that. they likely have that evry issue to this very day, and they deserve it.

    18. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      The answer to that might be important depending on where it is. For example, if it's a Christian school they might want to actually know if you are a Christian. I can see not asking if the company is a secular one and the asking isn't really the issue as far as I am concerned....it's if they reject you because you don't have the same one where it becomes an issue....IF it's a secular business.

      --

      Gorkman

    19. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Seriously?

      It's a correction of a common, not embarrassing, not humiliating error, with a link to a phenomenally useful site, and you're doing the 'it's rude to correct' thing?

      Mistakes are golden if corrections are useful. Get a fucking grip.

      (not the same AC, before you ask)

    20. Re:Thats why your #1 priority in an interview is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An also can be important for other things, I'm my company we know the religion of people and is used to determine shifts and holidays. This is very convenient as is very common for Jews to work without problem the Sundays, by religion it's day of rest is on Saturday and for them it have been setup a Friday-Saturday weekend.

  9. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...jobs cause stress. More at 11.

  10. It's the economy stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many of us work at a company where they laid off a large chunk of the technical workforce and told the remainder to hang tight while the economy recovered or hired temps? Now that the Dow is back at record levels mgmt turns around and says "nothing horrible happened when you were half staffed so you must have been slacking before".

    Meanwhile hardware is not being replaced and software is not being updated. Hours are being wasted trying to breathe life into decades old tech which is obselete.

  11. It's about being "Always on" by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm an IT professional and more than once I've thought about quitting, especially when I was doing high-stress consulting. Clients treat you like meat, like "the help." They have no problem waking you up at 5AM with nonsense problems. If you don't answer and do it politely, they call your boss and then your job/livelihood is in jeopardy.

    This isn't just a 9-5 thing where, when you leave the office, you're no longer on the hook -- it's always happening. Sometimes, you're at a bar at 10PM and you get an urgent call -- pick it up, and you in your tipsy state are now on the hook to resolve an important issue.

    The fear of getting these calls has made me stay home sometimes when I could have been being social, and not travel away on vacation when I knew some action was going on I'd be needed for. It creates a lot of stress to be depended on so much, and now with telecommuting, you're expected to be responsive at all times wherever you are.

    It's a lot of stress even in the best setup/most-redundant environments, and the job is not for everyone. And when projects come up that are difficult and highly user-facing, it's hard to avoid this type of a situation.

    1. Re:It's about being "Always on" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nothing to do with IT, it's life today for an awful lot of people in the always being available in the modern world. There are many people that have no lives and fill their's with work, expecting others to do the same. Mmany of these are divorcees half way up the career ladder, and with their youth gone, they soon find the pool of other singles isn't interesting in them, so the compensate with work.

      It doesn't matter whether it's accounting, legal, realty, medical and of course, IT, it's a problem with modern life. People cope with it when they're young, but by the time they have a real life, marry have kids etc, priorities change.

    2. Re:It's about being "Always on" by mjr167 · · Score: 1

      How is that different from being... a doctor, a fireman, a nuclear plant operator, a plumber, or an electrical line repairman?

      Welcome to the world of essential services. When your job is to keep things working, you don't get to pick your hours cause shit happens.

    3. Re:It's about being "Always on" by Bigby · · Score: 1

      It isn't quite as much if the IT admins are redundant. They should have 4 people that know the same stuff. But that costs money...money the management doesn't want to spend, because they can just call you at 10 PM while you are at a bar or on vacation.

    4. Re:It's about being "Always on" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern life is one thing, IT administration is a level up. It really is something you don't understand without being there. It doesn't seem that bad, but it is. IT admin is not just a normal job, you're the fall guy for crapping programming, bad luck, and acts of nature. When Windows blue screens at work, you're the guy who gets the blame, not Microsoft.

      Technology is magical and scary to people, blaming the admin makes people feel better.

      On call for a few hours is nothing, but it's like someone who's always clearing their throat in your office - individually not bad, but oh-so-annoying for days on end. You can't ever fully relax, every time your cell rings it could be work, and so on. The problems all have people behind them, yelling or ready to yell. And the Admin is always to blame. You spend all day working on things what were built or designed poorly, failing, or just messed up, so most of the job is on the negative side - which can be frustrating.

      It's like being a data detective much of the time. Little hints, obscure log entries, googling for info, and hours carefully hunting for more clues.

      Developing is so much better. There isn't the same responsibility and stress. I found the focus and limited view downright relaxing.

      Here's the thing - it's a steady, crushing job that most people couldn't handle. I got suckered into it because everyone else stepped back years and years ago. I didn't cheat writing code and I was an amazing dev. Now I'm an admin with years of experience and I'd take a pay cut going back. The devs look down on the job, and I hear crap now and again about how easy it seems and that I must sit on my ass. I understand - I used to think that too. I miss the straight-forward development work, but not being treated like a disposable monkey. I have co-workers who do development contracts on the side to relax though.

      I had to learn more for IT Admin than I had to learn for programming. I spend all day working around and fixing bugs that developers left in. The "it's a feature" joke pisses me off.

    5. Re:It's about being "Always on" by nine-times · · Score: 4, Informative

      It seems to me that it's a little worse with IT support than with many other comparably skilled jobs. In recent years, there's been a competitive race-to-the-bottom. No one wants to pay for IT, and so there's been a trend towards MSPs instead of in-house IT. Those MSPs are competing by promising clients the moon. They can't deliver on the moon, obviously, but they push their employees to try. Meanwhile, the MSPs are making their money by being understaffed.

      At least that's what I'm seeing. It seems like the MSPs are going in saying, "We'll provide full support 24/7 365 days a year." Meanwhile they have 3 employees, all of whom work full time during business hours, but are asked to also be on call 24/7 without taking real vacations.

      I'm not saying that's unique to IT support workers, but it doesn't seem to be the norm.

    6. Re:It's about being "Always on" by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that you were foolish enough to agree to be available during outside hours. You have no one to blame but yourself for not establishing boundaries, on call hours after hours, finding subordinates to be available during off hours, or establishing competent service level agreements.

      Not every job will let you establish this, but it should be set from the interview. And hey, maybe there's threat of being fired if you don't perform, but jokes on them, if they fire you, you owe them nothing. At the very least you can begin searching for your next job where at least you'll be happy and maybe someone can appreciate your real value.

    7. Re:It's about being "Always on" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they get to call their rate and are into a professional trade association.

    8. Re:It's about being "Always on" by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1

      There are other doctors always available to take care of patients. Other firefighters are always on call to put out fires. These industries are highly systematized with workforce redundancy in mind -- and typically don't happen in the form of small businesses/startups. What if you're at a small-medium business, and you're the ONLY IT person, or one of two or three IT people who know about some critical issue that needs fixing? And attempts at getting help /consultants have not gotten through management due to cost?

    9. Re:It's about being "Always on" by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not so much "foolish enough," but that's what the market is looking for. In Silicon Valley (where I am located), every single IT position I interviewed for or looked into had some mention of "availability for after hours" or "on-call rotation." It's really become part of the culture to have IT workers be always on, and if you're not willing to do that, your job will go to some 22-year old hotshot out of college who is willing to do anything to get in the door.

    10. Re:It's about being "Always on" by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1
      100% true -- MSP sales teams go out and say "We're 24/7 available." That means they wake you up late at night via some phone system, or they have someone overseas to answer calls, whose job it is to wake you up late at night for this 24/7 support.

      Just like the night shift at a hospital -- the best doctors are available during the day. Patients get forgotten about by nurses at night sometimes (it's a big problem) -- the best nurses are also working during the day shift if they can. The best IT people work during the day -- so when escalation support is needed at night, they get woken up.

      May not be unique to IT workers, but sure is common in that field.

    11. Re:It's about being "Always on" by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain, man...I worked at a place that (the last year that I was there) had me working 32 hours onsite during the week (every week), and I pulled on-call (which was quite busy for a 24/7 shop - with doctors) for 36 weeks that year. I think the reasons why I quit are self-evident :p

      And you're right - IT (especially in small shops with only one or two techs) seem to be viewed somewhere between the Receptionist and the Janitor, with the glory of neither.

    12. Re:It's about being "Always on" by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      How is that different from being... a doctor, a fireman, a nuclear plant operator, a plumber, or an electrical line repairman?

      Welcome to the world of essential services. When your job is to keep things working, you don't get to pick your hours cause shit happens.

      Most admins don't provide any essential services. The systems most of them are responsible for keeping running do not run the equipment at any hospital, fire station, nuclear power plant, or other service in which people will be injured/killed if it does not function properly. Some people really need to get a grip...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    13. Re:It's about being "Always on" by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      If the company absolutely positively has to get ahold of you when a problem occurs, they're severely fucked up. In a responsibly run company, there are no essential employees. Management has completely and utterly failed to do it's job if a particular person is required. Forget about what happens if they don't answer their pager, what happens if they get run over by a bus?

      If they need someone to be available 24/7, they need to hire multiple people who work in shifts. If they can't do that, well, that's their decision, but it's their problem, not the poor admin who's trying to get some sleep. He or she is not responsible for the fact that the company only hired one person when they needed more, and absolutely positively should not be indulging the company in supporting highly unethical and irresponsible management.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    14. Re:It's about being "Always on" by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      In the absence of labor unions, the kind of power you like to pretend employees have doesn't really exist. Most people are only as "foolish" as they need to be to not starve.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    15. Re:It's about being "Always on" by nine-times · · Score: 1

      MSP sales teams go out and say "We're 24/7 available." That means they wake you up late at night via some phone system

      Yup. Your MSP may be offering 24/7 support, but they do not have anyone working 2nd shift or 3rd shift. They do not have staff waiting by the phone, ready to take your phone call.

      And it's not just about "the best IT people work during the day". Essentially, every time you call on nights or weekends, you're harassing some poor schmuck on his off-hours, ruining his personal life, because you can't wait until business hours. I hope you ask yourself, "Can this not wait? Do I really need help *right now*?"

      What's more, you'll get worse support during the day if you keep calling at night. Because the "best IT people" who work during the day are exhausted from answering your stupid questions on their off time.

      Sorry. I've had that job, and it sucks.

    16. Re:It's about being "Always on" by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1

      If we're talking about a big, 100+ employee company, sure. What about a 20 person startup, with only enough funding for one IT person, or hiring an MSP? Or an MSP -- where if they had this late night person working, they'd have to be familiar with all the client environments and changes in order to help effectively. With MSPs with over 100+ clients, the person or group would never finish playing catch-up just to have enough background to handle everyone's issues (even with the best/most diligently updated documentation).

    17. Re:It's about being "Always on" by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      How is that different from being... a doctor, a fireman, a nuclear plant operator, a plumber, or an electrical line repairman?

      Nuclear plant operators, firemen and electrical line repairmen are on call on a fixed schedule and get paid for those hours and if they're called in, they get paid overtime. Doctors and plumbers don't have to answer the phone at all, and if they choose to, they get paid between $150 and $6,000 an hour.

    18. Re:It's about being "Always on" by DigiShaman · · Score: 2

      I work for an MSP. This is 100% true. ALL MSPs over-extend themselves. It's why I have so-so days of work, and days where shit really hits the fan from all sides. In one day I can book my on-site break-fix visit a whole week in advanced if backlogged.

      Working for an MSP is extremely stressful. The pay sucks, getting new clients is next to impossible (you lose clients as quickly as you get new ones) as all businesses are looking for cheaper IT support with more value added. And if that wasn't bad, finding competent IT sales-engineers is next to impossible.

      You know, at times I just want to say "fuck it", just go back to filing cabinets and fax machines. Don't both with this house of cards.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    19. Re:It's about being "Always on" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protip: You are "the help".

  12. "have considered"? by Pooch+Bushey · · Score: 1

    try "have quit". i quit years ago, not because of the stress caused by users/customers, but because of ineffective management and, specifically, a ceo (not a manager, but the ceo) telling you (a) in front of anyone in the immediate area, (b) in public, and (c) in meetings that you (literally) were a fuck up and didn't know what you were doing. it was a 100 employee company; she did that to most of the senior employees. most tolerated it (among them her management team). some of us didn't.

  13. No sh$! sherlock... by morcego · · Score: 2

    Working in IT (started as support drone, now admin and consultant) for 20 years.

    Back to college right now. Just started Law School.

    Most of my friends either gave up IT to just work in management, or are in the process of switching fields.

    The comodititization of IT destroyed it.

    --
    morcego
    1. Re:No sh$! sherlock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Just started Law School.

      You might want to spend some time looking into the lack of jobs for Lawyers once they graduate.

      Then call up Randy Kelton on Friday night 512-646-1984 and ask about the different ways Lawyers can be handed the short brown sticky end of the stick.

    2. Re:No sh$! sherlock... by reynolds_john · · Score: 1

      YMMV, but some of our friends did what you suggested and pursued law. Unfortunately, there is a huge glut of lawyers out there right now, and their pay is (from what we're hearing) rather miserable, with long hard hours as well. I'd be interested to hear otherwise.

    3. Re:No sh$! sherlock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An attorney here, and a former IT systems guy here myself. I mean no offense, but the law is a commodity now as well, partly because of people like us. I wish you the best, but remember that the grass isn't always greener...

    4. Re:No sh$! sherlock... by morcego · · Score: 1

      YMMV, but some of our friends did what you suggested and pursued law. Unfortunately, there is a huge glut of lawyers out there right now, and their pay is (from what we're hearing) rather miserable, with long hard hours as well. I'd be interested to hear otherwise.

      Money is really not the main issue for me. Even if my income drop something like 30%+, I'm still ok, if I can have somewhat more regular hours and, overall, live my life.

      I do agree that is not the same for everyone but, then again, one of my friends is going the Psychology route. Law school is, mostly, my personal example.

      --
      morcego
    5. Re:No sh$! sherlock... by reynolds_john · · Score: 1

      Cool beans. Best of luck to you - I've thought about the same thing multiple times but keep coming back to IT - it's what I love.

  14. Is this different from any other job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that it isn't interesting or relevant or something to work on, but how does this compare to other office functions?

  15. hilarious by argStyopa · · Score: 0

    And in other news, when asked about their jobs, EVERY OTHER HUMAN ON THE PLANET likewise responded that 80% of participants revealed that their job had negatively impacted their personal life in some way, (and) 18% have suffered stress-related health issues due to their work, and 28% have lost sleep due to work.

    Oh noes, sysadmins have tough jobs! Please.

    --
    -Styopa
  16. Computers don't sleep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the 24/7 part that really bothers me, it's the not getting paid for it that really gets me going.

    I'm honestly surprised that the budget thing is not a bigger source of stress. You may lose sleep every once in a while when something big crashes, but having to justify your existence every damn day to the $(C-level) && $(anyone with any authority over you whatsoever) is by far the biggest source of stress I've ever seen.

  17. Probably true at large corporations by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

    where you have to handle the typical asshole IT manager, who in turn has to handle his asshole manager and so on. I'm an admin in a small company, above me is my boss, and above him the owner. They just don't give a shit until everything works fine. So no, I don't consider my job extremely stressful, my users are software developers, they seem more stressed to me than I am. Not posting anonymously, 'caue I don't give a shit either.

    --
    .sig: No such file or directory
    1. Re:Probably true at large corporations by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1
      And small ones..with only the ability to hire consultants and/or a single, less experienced IT staff member. In the former case (consultants), the consultant gets all this work and they want it done efficiently at the lowest cost. When consultant does their best work, client complains about how long it takes and then consulting company manger yells at consultant, despite a job well done.

      In the latter case (less experienced), you have a guy running around like a chicken without a head desperately trying to learn just-in-time to put out fires.

    2. Re:Probably true at large corporations by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      Workwise, the best admin job I ever had was working for a small, local call center - maybe 50 employees.

      Then again, they fired me when I told them that $10/hr wasn't shit for a sysadmin... Maybe not that great a place to work after all.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    3. Re:Probably true at large corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps your wording may have helped the situation. =)

    4. Re:Probably true at large corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SMB is no better, two stays there and like stated above, both instances are mental pygmies who thought they knew everything, were micro managing little hitlers and would freak out despite they were the typical source of the problem. Every. Single. Time.

  18. Re:Considering quitting due to impersonator... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm replying to both you and the other guy: we don't care and minimize both of your rants as soon as we see them.

    The more you try to fight the troll, the more you feed him.

    Don't quit, just make another account. It's just a stupid user ID, get over it.

  19. Have to wonder ... by PhxBlue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How much of that manager-induced stress is a result of managers who don't know how to lead?

    If I'm the head of the department you work in, then my No. 1 job is to clear obstacles out of your way so you can do yours. If I'm the head of a different department that relies on you (as an infrastructure manager) to do its job, then my No. 1 job is to work with you to find the most reasonable way of making it happen.

    On the other side of that, though, I've run into folks who think they're the gatekeepers just because they have the keys to the building. Any good manager should take "no" for an answer from IT if IT just can't do it, e.g., it introduces unacceptable security risk, the infrastructure just isn't there, etc. But an IT person who says it can't be done and won't explain why shouldn't expect to stick around very long.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    1. Re:Have to wonder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Example:

      My last corporate job my manager asked me to rewire two jacks for ethernet, with one jack having been previously wired for T1.

      I rewired the jack with 1,2,3,6 and my manager complained I did it wrong. I went and tested the loop with lineman tools. It worked. However, he went and did whatever project he was disinclined to inform me about, and then again complained I did it wrong. This time I replied, "There is only one way, and you can verify it with this test kit." His response to that was to rip open the jack and berate me because I had only used 4 wires, and it had previously been wired with 5. Durrr.

      I tried to explain the difference between T1/ethernet, but he just literally ripped the line out of the jack and told me to wire it back up with 5 wires. So I did. He went off again, but to no surprise to me this time he again complain I did it wrong. However he backed it up by saying, even the lineman tools confirm I did it wrong this time. Durrr, "Yeah because you just told me wire it wrong." So he told me "redo whatever you did before where the tools said it was OK."

      Two months later I overheard the cocksucker let slip during a lunch break to one of co-workers that "the problem" he had solved was connecting two switches, one with auto-sense and one sent to 100mbps, was manually setting the auto one to 100. I laughed inside that he didn't have the balls to tell me "oops my bad".

      Of course, I wanted to quit before overhearing that.

    2. Re:Have to wonder ... by ISoldat53 · · Score: 1

      I have NEVER met a manager with that attitude. They are always looking up not down. No one below them can do anything for them. It's those above that can make your life easier.

    3. Re:Have to wonder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm the head of the department you work in, then my No. 1 job is to clear obstacles out of your way so you can do yours. If I'm the head of a different department that relies on you (as an infrastructure manager) to do its job, then my No. 1 job is to work with you to find the most reasonable way of making it happen.

      And that thought is a large part of the problem. I've been in multiple companies where I've done exactly those things, clear obstacles and if that's not possible help find a solution. In each case management decided on an unworkable/doomed-to-fail approach, either the decision to use technology that won't work or to structure the project so that there is no way other than herculean efforts that the project will succeed (and then actively preventing those herculean efforts). Management doesn't want to face reality when they've already decided something that strikes their fancy, they only want it to work or to be able to blame someone else for the failure. IT is a striking example of the issue where if you're doing your job right no one sees problems. The problem is that if you do your job right it's assumed that you're overstaffed or over funded. Unless your senior management actually has a clue it's a no-win situation.

    4. Re:Have to wonder ... by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is that IT people end up needing to "manage up" and "manage laterally" on a day to day basis, in a way that regular people with normal high stress jobs do not have to.

    5. Re:Have to wonder ... by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Management doesn't want to face reality when they've already decided something that strikes their fancy, they only want it to work or to be able to blame someone else for the failure.

      Pretty much. In that case, the only thing an IT admin can really do is document the management's decision in writing and move forward. That way you have some protection when they try to throw you under the bus later.

      IT is a striking example of the issue where if you're doing your job right no one sees problems.

      Whereas if you're doing management right, hardly anyone should see you at all -- and by that I mean, people should be able to do their jobs for long stretches of time without managerial meddling^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H "guidance."

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    6. Re:Have to wonder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like logistics. It is called 'managing the management'. If there is a large enough logistics unit they unofficially dedicate someone to handle that role full time. Their job role is usually nebulous and called a floater or utility man (nobody cares about being PC when moving freight). Maybe it is about time that IT departments find the guy with the most soft skills and an assertive nature to do the same.

    7. Re:Have to wonder ... by nine-times · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If I'm the head of the department you work in, then my No. 1 job is to clear obstacles out of your way so you can do yours.

      The best boss I ever had once told me, "My job is to make sure that you don't have to worry about anything except doing your job."

      That is, if your job is to make sure the server has zero downtime, his job is to take care of the office politics, budgeting, etc. so that you can focus on keeping the servers running. Some other manager within the company decides he doesn't like you? Well that's your his job to deal with. You need a piece of equipment that won't fit into the budget? His job. HR has stupid requirements for filling out timesheets? His job. Any goddamn thing other than showing up in the morning and keeping the servers running? His job.

      Keeping the servers running? Your job.

      And he fulfilled his job description. My job at the time was a fair bit more complicated than "keeping the servers running," but the point is that I had a job description, and I didn't have to deal with anything that fell outside of that job description. And do you know how I knew what my job description was? My manager made it very clear, because it was his job. He didn't want me to spend my time trying to figure out what I should and should not do. He made it clear that if I was unsure what I should be doing, I should ask him because if I'm confused, then he's not doing his job.

      Now that's a goddamn manager. I miss that guy.

    8. Re:Have to wonder ... by Kittenman · · Score: 1

      Interesting comment ... my boss takes no interest in the machines that I keep up 24/7, and rather than believing that he's just trusting me to do my job, I think it's because he doesn't care.

      And there's a shonky Windows replacement system coming up to replace my 99.999% up-time mainframe system that's getting the glory. The squeaky wheel does indeed get the oil A non-squeaking wheel just doesn't exist.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:Have to wonder ... by DeSigna · · Score: 2

      One of my first IT jobs was working under an ex-Army sergeant IT manager. He used to work on Prime mainframes for the ADF before going corporate, and had a lot of experience with project management on the high end of defense & government IT.

      We all had an immense amount of respect for him, whether it was me (early twenties) to the older 40/50-odd techs. If you screwed up, you got chewed out. He did a pretty decent disappointed-dad routine which was somehow worse than being yelled at.

      We respected him because we knew he gave a crap and kept the "Directors of Micro-Management" well and truly off our backs for the most part, made sure Technical Services was involved in major decisions as much as possible. We would get warned if something nasty was trickling down from the top. It fostered a healthy team spirit too, everyone looked out for everyone else, helped each other with problems and so on. If a customer was causing problems or making spurious complaints, our manager would be out there looking them in the eye and asking if they had a business case for being difficult. On the other hand, if he thought an issue was your fault, you would know in very clear detail the hows and whys.

      I only left that job when the company was acquired by another much larger one and the TSM was made redundant - though that's a much more involved story.

      Ever since then, I've sought out companies with a similar "feel" to work for, and tried to foster a similar tone when taking up management roles. I've been successful finding places to work, and I'd like to think I've done as good a job as I can for the rest.

      What's the point of this TL;DR? The biggest thing I've noticed is attitude makes up most of your workplace perception. I've worked in crappy places since (though not for long). Keep your head and chipper helpful attitude, useful people notice and come to you for direction instead of your boss and the vibe spreads. Walk around with a martyr complex and no-one will want to help. A healthy team means even if it's busy, it's not hard, and you have a lot of potential extra hands that may be more skilled than you. This goes a long way towards getting a recalcitrant boss on your side too, if they have any kind of management skill at all.

      Can't really help with bad management, if they don't recognise your value, leave. You'll find out if you've overestimated on that part pretty quickly.

    10. Re:Have to wonder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slow clap... standing ovation... I had a couple of managers I really liked but none quite made it to the level you're speaking of.

    11. Re:Have to wonder ... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      It's a myth. Those don't exist. Most managers see getting stuff done by rolling it down hill. The prime directive of any human being is to make their lives less stressful by pushing the problem onto others. They just happen to have the knowledge and skill set you do not have (hence, you're not a manager). It's ok though. This is the way of the world. It's as old as time itself.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    12. Re:Have to wonder ... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      It's a myth? I'm telling you that I actually, in reality, had a manager like that. When you talked to him for any amount of time, you realized that he didn't really see his job as "You work for me! Do what I say!" but more like, "Even though I'm your manager, I work for you. My job is to remove the obstacles that keep you from doing your job." And it wasn't all talk. He actually did that.

      Like if he saw you looking frustrated, he'd come up and ask if there was something wrong. He'd listen to you. If it was like, "Well I'm trying to finish this project, but [whoever] in [some other department] is dragging his feet and not providing enough information," then he'd go, "Ok, let me see what I can do."

      He'd disappear for a little bit, and come back, saying, "[whoever] in [some other department] will have the information by the end of the day. If he doesn't, let me know." And that was the end of it. I don't even know how he got it done, because [whoever] in [some other department] was a lazy bastard who never did anything.

      Look, if you've just had bad managers your entire life, then I understand your cynicism. There are a lot of crappy managers out there. But think about it this way: take any job in the world, and the majority of people doing that job are bad at it. It's hard to find a good doctor. It's hard to find a good contractor. It's hard to find a good IT person. And it's hard to find a good manager.

      But management is a real job with a real skill-set, and a good manager is worth his/her weight in gold.

    13. Re:Have to wonder ... by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Interesting comment ... my boss takes no interest in the machines that I keep up 24/7, and rather than believing that he's just trusting me to do my job, I think it's because he doesn't care.

      How often does your boss stop by just to see how you're doing?

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    14. Re:Have to wonder ... by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      But management is a real job with a real skill-set, and a good manager is worth his/her weight in gold.

      And the funny thing is, most of that "skill set" is just trusting the people who work for you to (a) give you good advice and (b) do the right thing, listening to your people, and making sure they can do their jobs with minimal outside interference.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    15. Re:Have to wonder ... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I guess what you're saying is kind of true, but...

      Well, first, "trusting the people who work for you to give you good advice," might not be different from "listening too your people". More importantly, there's a lot involved in "making sure your people can do their jobs with minimal outside interference." You have to be enough of a psychologist to understand the needs of the people you're managing. You need to be enough of an efficiency expert to create an appropriate context for your people to work in. You have to be enough of a politician to navigate internal bureaucracy. You need to be enough of an accountant to squeeze everything into your budget. You need to be enough of a businessman and salesman to sell this all to upper-management.

    16. Re:Have to wonder ... by nine-times · · Score: 1

      And as far as him being a myth, I'll admit that I'm glossing over some stuff. He wasn't some magical being who actually made all obstacles go away. He was arguably a bit of a redneck who made dirty jokes and said inappropriate things.

      He generally *tried* to remove all the obstacles, but of course there were times where I had to deal with some nonsense outside of my job description. But most of the time, he managed to create a low-stress environment in a company that was full of chaos. In my opinion, he did a really good job.

    17. Re:Have to wonder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then find a new job. All of my managers have been great.. they basically let me do my thing (technical stuff) and figure out how to make me as productive and impactful as possible.

  20. Applicable Sub Reddit by bobstreo · · Score: 1

    http://www.reddit.com/r/talesfromtechsupport/

    The 24 part series by Jon6 is entertaining...

    1. Re:Applicable Sub Reddit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I read that post by jon6, all 24 parts. I would not be able to last with someone like that as my manager.

      This may explain it though:

      http://madamenoire.com/25917/six-signs-your-boss-might-be-a-sociopath/

      And how someone like that gets in power in the first place:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dilbert_principle

    2. Re:Applicable Sub Reddit by broseidon · · Score: 1

      Entertaining and painful. Aquaman knows I wouldn't have put up with half of what that redditor did regardless of my personal/financial circumstances.

  21. IT Management by Kimomaru · · Score: 1

    Boy, this post speaks the truth. Good IT Managers are extremely rare, most don't cut it. Ours is actually pretty awesome and actually has a technical background, but he's the first decent one I've every had (been working in the field for 15 years.) It all falls apart if the group isn't being led right and upper management's clueless.

    1. Re:IT Management by Shados · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of good management people. They just all hire each other and end up working for the same few companies, and the rest pick up the scrap.

      Something like (numbers out of my rear) the top 5% places to work for will eat up 95% of the good IT managers...the last 5% being made of people who want to take a crappy company and salvage it for recognition...

  22. I don't live at home anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I live at the office. When I buy groceries I put them into the office fridge. I only get 5 hours of sleep. I might need to file an extension for my taxes this year. I wouldn't even have the time to write up a resignation letter.

    1. Re:I don't live at home anymore by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      There is a threshold of abuse whereupon the problem is you being a doormat, not others laying too much on you.

      If you're really so critical that you've got to be around 90% of the time, leaving would ruin the company, and you'd have leverage.

    2. Re:I don't live at home anymore by megalomaniacs4u · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your resignation letter only has to say the minimum - Nixon's resignation letter, is the best example:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Letter_of_Resignation_of_Richard_M._Nixon,_1974.jpg

      I've used the same basic letter when I've quit in the past. You may get hauled into a meeting to find out why, but you don't have to tell them anything other than you quit (if they want you to work a notice period you'll find out)

    3. Re:I don't live at home anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one of my resignation letters said exactly this

      "To whom it may concern, as of (Date) i am resigning my position of (Position)"

      and that was it. I smiled a little at the To whom it may concern line.

  23. This is exactly why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My company requires all IT administrators who still have hair to shave their heads weekly. It cuts down on the janitorial costs of floor cleanup.

    We also have brown paper bags behind glass which reads, "Break here in case of hyperventilation."

  24. Re:Considering quitting due to impersonator... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you aren't actually the same person... Classic political maneuvering in a forum where it doesn't matter. Who cares if you're right? The whole thing is obnoxious, you're obnoxious, and we want you both to go away to reduce the level of irritation we experience reading the forums on a regular basis. You should be thanking the troll for all the free publicity and then going about your business... assuming either of you (if you aren't the same person) have anything else to do.

  25. Re:Considering quitting due to impersonator... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Quitting is also a viable option.

  26. Should fix itself by 2016 by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Boomers are retiring much faster than projected.

    5 million in 2010 and 2011 instead of the expected 1.7 million.

    Enough boomers will retire to completely cancel the unemployment rate by 2020.

    Once labor gets the upper hand- it's going to have it for the next 19 years after that short of some kind of wonder automation/robotics.

    And 460 million chinese are retiring over the same time period. More than the total population of the united states. Only 76 million united states boomers will retire.

    The pattern is this:
    -2012, about 2.5 million per year retired.
    2013-2016, 3.3 million retire per year.
    2017-2028, 4.5 million retire per year.
    2029-2031, 3.3 million retire per year.
    2032+ back to about 2.5 million until the baby boomer echo.

    Only 1.8% of people make it to age 90 and I'm not likely to be one of them.
    I expect to die by 2034.

    And there is something else to consider. If you are a boomer and you've been saving- when the second parent dies (likely before age 83), their estate puts you well past your retirement goals instantly and you may be able to retire (well) before age 60. So there is a multiplier effect here.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  27. Call out charges? by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    Put in your consulting contract a call out fee of $1000 - i.e. if you pick up the phone your client is on the hook for $1000? When I was working full and went on holiday I told my employer that contacting me whilst on holiday would be at contractor rates. They never did... Or make your mobile number a premium rate number: $50 a minute might help concentrate their minds, but less blatantly

    1. Re:Call out charges? by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, other consulting companies will undercut you on that and not charge that fee so they get the business in the first place. The consulting company CEO chooses sales over quality of life for consultants -- his company might not even survive if he doesn't.

    2. Re:Call out charges? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed the point. Normally you would work there full time. Outside of normal hours you charge them a consultancy fee for calling you etc. The whole idea is to get them not to call you, or at least to make it worth your time if they insist.

  28. Re:Considering quitting due to impersonator... apk by raydobbs · · Score: 1

    I used to just keep reporting it as spam. Over and over and over again - but apparently that flag does nothing, so I gave up.

  29. telcos, esp. by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Back in the seventies, I heard that Ma Bell employees used to "brag" about how many hours they'd worked that week.

    Then, '95-'97, I worked for Ameritech, a Baby Bell, since swallowed by SBC (which then swallowed AT&T, and renamed itself to AT SBC is the true Evil Empire), and discovered what was going on: ludicrous deadlines, utterly unrealistic goals, and little sub-empires that, rather than looking for buy-in, got the authority to tell us how to make the Perfect World (tm), as Revealed by them....

    Took about a year and a half, year and three quarters, before a psychologist friend gave a professional opinion that I was *this* far from clinical burnout.

    All for well under $60k/yr.

    And they claim they've got all these unfilled tech jobs, and can't find people to do them, so Congress, please let us bring people over who'll work for diddly-squat, and do 70 or 80 hour weeks with no complaint....

                            mark

  30. Oh, laddie. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    You've got a lot to learn if you want people to think of you as a miracle worker

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  31. Stress varies by elistan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've never had a job other than IT support, so I don't know how it compares to other work, but I have had different IT support jobs with wildly different stress levels.

    On the low-stress side, picture a small shop. 50 to 100 servers, two or three admins. You know each server, what it does, what its quirks are, what external systems it talks to, you control not only the server but its storage and networking and backups, you're the dba, the webmaster, you know by name all the developers that write the code that runs on the servers, you know most of the users and all of the managers of the company by name... It's a lot of different hats, but with the limited number of systems you have enough time to pay each its proper attention. You can tweak each server individually. Only in extremely rare occasions like a failed controller on the SAN do you get called off-hours. This sort of job is fun and engaging.

    The high-stress job is from being on a team that "owns" a few thousand servers in a global corporation with a poorly set up support model - but you only has access to the OS. No ability to work on the databases or SAN, no rights to the switches or hypervisor, and when it's your turn to be on-call you are guaranteed to get calls all through the night - calls ranging ranging from hung servers that need a reboot, to performance issues that take hours and hours to coordinate troubleshooting with the SAN team that swears it's not their issue even though its several systems all connected to the same controller, users on the other side of the world having whatever issue, on systems you don't know they first thing about except its a database server or whatever because of the naming convenntion. No sleep that week, no ability to go to a movie without fear of being paged... Pure stress for the week of being on-call, and dreadful anticipation all other times.

    I was glad to have been laid off from a job like the latter during the financial crisis.

    I'll take a job like the former, even with a micro-managing, cover-sheet-your-TPS-report, the-sky-is-falling type boss, over another one like the latter any day.

    1. Re:Stress varies by wintermute000 · · Score: 1

      I agree entirely and I'm in the former boat and have dealt with many times with the latter (global parent company, providers, migrating to mgd services etc.). The difference in the turnaround time for anything (faults or projects/implementations ) is absolutely amazing, and so its the level of competency (theres a lot of room for duds to hide in a large team).

      The trick is to find an environment that lets you do the former but has the size/scale that lets you play with the big iron / keep up your skills. From my networking perspective I'd say around 5000-10000 endpoints is the sweet spot.

    2. Re:Stress varies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take a job like the former, even with a micro-managing, cover-sheet-your-TPS-report, the-sky-is-falling type boss, over another one like the latter any day.

      Amen.

      I've been in a similar situation - I've worked for the tiniest of clients, and I've worked with Fortune 500 companies that are household names. Give me the former any day of the week. Even if the pay is worse. Even if the hours are worse. Shit, even if I'm on call.

      There's something to be said for - despite having to be the one to do it - being able to just go in and fix shit. No blame passing. No responsibility shifting. No endless meetings about nothing.

      The former is why people become admins. The latter is why there's a strong market for replacement souls in the sysadmin world; because these companies devour them at an astonishing rate.

    3. Re:Stress varies by technologypot · · Score: 1

      The saddest thing I have ever seen is a scenario exactly as you describe, a really horrible working situation for the poor server guys whose worklife appears to mirror your 'few thousand' server setup. Only, there were only 150 servers. Adding up to 350 or so if you count the VMs. Sometimes even a job that ought to be pleasant is utterly ruined by idiotic management.

    4. Re:Stress varies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got laid off from AT&T Wireless too?

  32. Auto-Immune Diseases are Stress Related by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, seriously, they are. Also inflammatory malfunctions such as IBD & Crohn's disease are specifically linked to:

    1) stress
    2) lack of sleep

    I know this as an IBD patient who is *required* to see a psychologist as an integrated part of treatment.
    I'd be curious to know how many of us in this world suffer from such things. Quite a large number in my immediate circle do. I suppose that could be circumstantial. Call it a hunch.

  33. It's Not New, Really. by p00kiethebear · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The people who are stressed about working in IT have a valid point. But this doesn't make you any different than say... a head chef?

    Millions of blue collar workers have to survive on less than half what the average introductory IT job pays and many have to do it in an environment where they don't speak the language. Imagine going into work and having to learn the ropes your first day just by watching. I had to work in kitchens for ten years and I'm telling you the responsibilities don't end there. It's your night or day off? Too bad, the dishwasher called in sick and we have to put you in? Oh sorry we can't pay you overtime, we're just going to pay you in regular wage with cash. Oops, we're paying you too much cash because you're working too much. How about we just pay you the same ammount every month no matter how much you work? Sexual harrasment? Too bad, your boss, is the HR, your manager, and the mediator all rolled into one.

    There are literally rehab centers built specifically for chefs because thouands of them burn out and start drinking on the job to deal the with stress. If everyone else wants to go home early, or the numbers arn't right that week, your boss will send everyone else home and you have to clean the kitchen yourself.

    4% more IT workers want to quit because of stress? Boo fucking hoo. So does everyone else who has to work a shitty job with long hours. At least you're being compensated at a fair wage for the skills you've developed. You're probably being paid over time if you're by the hour and you can probably also afford to buy a house. Not to mention basic health if not full benefits. If I cut myself with a knife I have to pay cash for the 5 stitches it takes to sew it up.

    Every job that takes skill and dedication looks shitty from the inside out. But seriously? Whenever I think about quiting my job or get angry about something trivial, I remember that I'm not dodging the secret police in North Korea or Bullets in Bosnia and I realize how lucky I am to even have a job. I wish I had the skills to be an IT worker so I could at least get paid a fair wage and didn't have to go home with dishpan hands every night. But this is what I get for playing more video games in college than doing actual work. Ultimately we're all masters of our own destiny.

    Be the change you want to see in your life. I would have been a lot happier and probably drank a lot less if I was on an IT workers salary. But as far as I'm concerned, I read this headline as "NEWS FLASH, PEOPLE HATE THEIR JOBS!"

    --
    The Blade Itself
    1. Re:It's Not New, Really. by DrGamez · · Score: 2

      Just because a Head Chef job is really rough, doesn't mean that the IT job is any less rough.

      What was the point of this other to say: other jobs are hard too?

      Our current pay/benefits system doesn't adequately compensate those who are doing actual hard work, but that doesn't mean the plight of the IT/Head Chef is any less... plighty. We can always hope for better, if even we are being unrealistic about our expectations.

    2. Re:It's Not New, Really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show me a kitchen that pages the head chef at 4am and I'll believe you.

    3. Re:It's Not New, Really. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >Just because a Head Chef job is really rough, doesn't mean that the IT job is any less rough.
      Well, it could mean just that. I'm not going to comment on the head chef as I have no experience, but extrapolate that to miners or fishermen, say: you have to catch at least a certain amount of fish to get paid, work outside in shitty weather, and there's a non-trivial chance of dying horribly. Does i make sitting on your naked ass at home sound less rough?

      I think the point might be that the echo chamber is developing some sort of persecution complex, whereby only the IT employees are hard working, valuable, over-stressed, underpaid, and most threatened by offshoring and immigration.

      It's important to keep an overall perspective, otherwise you come off as VW Phaeton owners complaining about slow ashtrays to the rest of the world.

    4. Re:It's Not New, Really. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      If you, as a head chef, make a mistake it costs you what? Maybe 100-200? If we as server techs and admins make a mistake it can cost millions....even billions. I'd take the stress of being a head chef any day.

      --

      Gorkman

    5. Re:It's Not New, Really. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      Not really fair as the head chef is probably already in the kitchen preparing for breakfast for people who want to eat at 7 am.

      Try paging the head chef at 2 am right after he closed the restaurant....

      --

      Gorkman

    6. Re:It's Not New, Really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Work culture in America is broken. Rationalizing one field's unreasonable, unnecessary stresses by comparing them to another field's unreasonable, unnecessary stresses is a cop-out. Yea, we could all be in prison camps so why bother to examine and question anything? Right...

    7. Re:It's Not New, Really. by p00kiethebear · · Score: 1

      If you, as a head chef, make a mistake it costs you what? Maybe 100-200? If we as server techs and admins make a mistake it can cost millions....even billions. I'd take the stress of being a head chef any day.

      WRONG. If you make a mistake as a head chef, you can kill someone.

      --
      The Blade Itself
    8. Re:It's Not New, Really. by p00kiethebear · · Score: 1

      It does happen. I was phoned at 3 am once because my helper in the kitchen was in jail and I had to be there in an hour to make sure both of our work was done. I was phoned at 2 am by my food rep that a fish delivery wouldn't be coming and I would have to catch a 4:15 ferry to Seattle to go pick up the fish at the market myself. Responsibility means the same thing in all languages and jobs. When you're the one responsible, you're expected to show up and make sure everything goes smooth without a hitch. I will concede though that the early morning phone calls probably happen less frequently than in the IT crowd and they usually don't involve immediate action. Most commonly it's a worker saying he or she is going to be late or can't come in.

      --
      The Blade Itself
    9. Re:It's Not New, Really. by p00kiethebear · · Score: 1

      This one Where I learned all about the responsibilities of being a sushi chef.

      --
      The Blade Itself
  34. It can be demanding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having management listed as a top source of stress hit a chord with me. Until recently I was working in an medium office. Out of an IT staff of about six, I believe three of us ended up leaving due to stress or stress-related illnesses. The cause of the stress was often (though not always) management. Not necessarily our direct manager, but management in general. It was a very frustrating environment in which to work, not people of the work itself, or the hours, but because of the conflicting signals coming down from on high.

  35. As an IT manager myself... by KipBoyle · · Score: 2

    ...I'm embarrassed that the top source of stress is (wait for it...) "management". Even users cause stress less often (16% vs 35%). Obviously, there are way too many PHB around. Hope I'm not already assimilated...

    --
    @KipBoyle
  36. Down... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not across.

  37. I'm not surprised by MBCook · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised. It can be bad enough when they actually know what they're doing, if they have no clue it can be terrible.

    There is an amazing story on Reddit (in 23 short parts!) of an IT manager from hell destroying a workplace. It's frustrating just to read.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    1. Re:I'm not surprised by noc007 · · Score: 1

      Came here to recommend that story. You beat me to it.

      Slight SPOILER hint:
      It doesn't end the way you want it to. It ends in the typical fassion it would at any corporation and it drives me crazy.

  38. My IT Director was so paranoid.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I quit after the following incident:

    IT Auditor: Who has admin access to this? (question #30 of 50)

    Me: Me, the lead sysadmin, the release admin, the IT director, and the one-man-shop "IT Manager" at a company we bought. ...(audit results come back)

    IT Director: You told the auditors the computer guy at the subsidiary has admin, because you don't want him to have it, and you didn't like that I told you to give it to him! Now you've got to take it away from him and I've got to explain to my boss why he had access.

    Me: Uh, no, they asked me who has admin, along with 49 other questions. I don't work like that, like everyone is out to get me. I'm not paranoid.

    IT Director: I'm not paranoid, and you better not be spreading that behind my back!

    So yeah, it seemed like a good time to move on.

  39. I wish.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If more admins started quitting, it would be easier for me to find a new job...

  40. In other obnoxiously obvious news........ by guitardood · · Score: 1

    73% of meteorological scholars agree that the sky above the clouds appears to be blue.

    This consensus is however disputed by the aforementioned 73% of IT folks thinking about quitting, seeing as how they haven't even seen the sky in a blue moon....LOL

    --
    -- L8R, guitardood
  41. Stress at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've worked in various industries. But to me IT was the most stressful of the lot. The trend also seems to be: the more the pay, the higher the stress levels. From what I've seen, when it comes time to unwind and party; the IT guys tend to go more ballistic then people in other industries. I guess there is a bit of truth in the old adage: "work hard, play hard".

    There is nothing worse than being stuck in digital serfdom, because the opportunities are not better than other industries.

  42. I quit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be the sysadmin for a high school, and I lasted three years. My primary job stress: faculty who considered themselves IT experts and went straight to the principal to set policies based on their own fabrication of the truth. Some of the biggest doozies:

    - Users frequently tried to get me to stop using imaging and instead "diagnose and fix the problem", insisting they'd lose the contents of their U: drives. They weren't sure what they expected me to do, but they didn't want me to do the enterprise-IT trick of wipe/format/image, instead resorting to...Norton Spring Cleaning? SpySweeper?

    - The math department head launched a war against my replacing inkjet printers with laser, because laser toner cost more than inkjet ink. Per-page costs were ignored, because departments treated their budgets like people living paycheck-to-paycheck, and couldn't look beyond the next week. Purchase of super-cheap printers and copiers behind my back was widespread, and I was stuck with the support when they broke after a few months.

    - I lied to an assistant principal about being able to except one teacher from the GPO that locks the screen after an hour idle. One teacher felt like pressing Ctrl+Alt+Del and typing her password once per day was too much work, and went on a rampage about it.

    - A user complained her Internet connetion was too slow, and blew $800 of her department budget to replace a P4/2.26 with a P4/2.8 to "solve" the problem (it didn't). She kept both PCs side-by-side so she wouldn't lose any of her work on her "old" U: drive. When I delivered the new PC, she demanded "Where's my flat-screen monitor?", to which I replied that it wasn't in the quote from Dell I had given her to forward to the bookkeeper. This incident in particular launched my get-another-job initiative.

    I'm now the source-code-versioning/Perforce/Jenkins guy somewhere else, and I love it.

  43. Seems Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called "work", not "super happy fun time".

    1. Re:Seems Obvious by lightknight · · Score: 1

      It's called "work" not "BDSM time with loud shouting / personal insults and poor pay." If I want to be yelled at by someone, I'll get married. Or I'll visit one of the seedier areas of a red light district, and pay one of the ladies dressed in leather to work me down until I can't bear the sight of myself in the mirror.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  44. Yay Shingles! by Wow8agger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I run a managed services department (so essentially I'm an IT director), and I think it's probably one of the most high stress positions that I've ever held. I'm on call 24x7, there is always money on the line, and it's a highly competitive industry.

    It was summer, and it started as just a weird burning/itching feeling along my right armpit, and I initially thought that I had gotten some poison oak/ivy/whatever on myself. I rubbed some calomine on it, and called it a day. Fast forward three days, and I had a incredibly painful rash that ran in a band from the center of my chest, under my armpit, and around the back of my shoulder. And holy shit did it hurt. Now I'm only in my early 30's, and for someone my age, Shingles really only has one source - stress. That particular week I had 26 customer facing engagements, and had worked 70+ for over a month.

    It was definitely a clarifying moment for me, and was directly responsible for my current attitude where we overstaff our department a little bit to keep the workload manageable, and I keep an eye on peoples timecards, and start hassling them about flextime when they go over 50 hours. The extra work hours just aren't worth the risk of someone having a health meltdown of some sort.

    -matt

    1. Re:Yay Shingles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shingles really only has one source - stress

      Wrong! I'm glad you're not a doctor. I had Shingles at 19 and living the easy life. Shingles results from the old chicken-pox virus you battled as a child waking up for a second round.

    2. Re:Yay Shingles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes shingles is a recurrence of chicken pox but it can come on due to a weakened immune system via stress. That's why it typically occurs at an older age. Are you a doctor?

      I had shingles a few years ago and it was excruciatingly painful. Came on as a simple rash and ended up attacking my nerves in my upper body and had a rash all over the left side of my body. I couldn't move for 3 days and felt after effects for a month. I still have numbness on a patch of skin on my shoulder.

      In my case it was stress caused by a combination of work deadlines, planning my wedding, and taking care of my terminally sick family member all at the same time. Not fun.

    3. Re:Yay Shingles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still wrong. Stress is NOT a proven cause, nor is the status of your immune system. Currently there is no research available to understand exactly how the virus becomes dormant and then reawakens. The fact you were stressed and were also afflicted by shingles is a coincidence, nothing more. I'm not a doctor, but I'm a hell of a lot smarter than you. You need to stop listening to your grandmother and start researching the answers on your own.

    4. Re:Yay Shingles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who is in there mid 20s I would have to agree. I graduated college when I was 23 and got a job as a sys admin for a managed service IT Company. I didn’t not make as much as the other guys because I was straight out of college which was expected. But they exploited the crap out of me. I was on call 24x7 working 16hour days and being called in on my days off or being told to work from home on the weekends. I began to lose my hair and started to have panic attacks because of the pressure from some of my clients. Fast forward 2 years, I quit. I could not take that type of abuse, it burnt me out and the crappy salary was not worth it. Yes I was a lucky one that got a job after college, but killing yourself with stress is not worth it.
      Now I work for an IT department for a local university and it’s very relaxed, I love life now. If you can find another job and leave. I have also learned to deal with losing my hair. Buzz cut!

    5. Re:Yay Shingles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course everything can't always be proven, but afterwards my doctor told me that everything going on in my life at the time might have attributed to it. It also made sense based on what I've read and researched on my own. Yes, my doctor told me this, not my grandmother, and I am much more inclined to believe him than some pretentious douche on Slashdot.

  45. IT admins arent the only ones or special. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh boo hoo, IT admins work a lot, they have stressful jobs, they think about quitting, blah blah blah. Yeah well, join the club called "Working for a living" and that club isn't just for IT people, its for you know, everyone who works for a living.

    Whats next? A story about how a large portion of IT people don't like getting up early in the morning for work?

    1. Re:IT admins arent the only ones or special. by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Nope, just a story about a large number of companies folding for lack of being competitive in a global environment. Seems they are unable to hire an IT people to keep things running, despite offering 'competitive wages,' and having an unlimited H1B limit to fall back upon. Who wants to work for a bunch of stuck of rich white kids who never pay their bills anyway, and think majoring in business / art history is all they need to do to live a successful life? They can keep their rapidly depreciating dollars / euros, and their business degrees for selling stuff they will no longer be able to make or afford, or perhaps art history degrees so they can host tours on Sundays for school children, while the rest of the world goes on the build something.

      Meanwhile the STEMs, the various trades, and so on of any decent caliber will be welcome elsewhere in the world. He who has the gold makes the rules, only so long as the people want gold.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
  46. Huh? by OldPappy · · Score: 1

    Stories (plural) of users folding 5.25 floppies to fit into 3.5 in drives? I haven't seen a 3.5 inch floppy in years, much less a 5.25 inch floppy. I am sure there are still some in use, but not enough to be a significant source of stories for IT people. Makes me wonder about the source of these statistics. I don't doubt that many IT people feel stress, just wondering where the authors of this study got their information. I didn't read the actual study, so maybe it was the author of the story just throwing some stuff in?

  47. 28% have lost sleep? by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1
    I think they meant to say, of the Admins polled, they on average lose 28% of their sleep.

    At least that's the way that most of the shops I've worked for are run...

    1. Re:28% have lost sleep? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Sounds about right. Usually we lose the lunch to afternoon coffee break nap.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:28% have lost sleep? by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      We shouldn't complain - we get our 5 hours a night...it's conveniently broken up into 1-2 hour chunks!

      I honestly can't gripe too much about the place I'm at now. Despite having a user base that's worldwide, there's a lot of allowance that's given for different time zones. The expectations in that regard aren't high, so this is probably one of the few jobs I've had that I'm *not* actively looking for work. (that takes place in the 10 minutes before running out the door, and the 15 minutes while the wife gets ready for bed (that would be known as "first attempt", to most of us))

  48. 6 figure stress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm.... When I was making 6 figures and felt stressed I would plan out a vacation trip or go shopping for a new car and the stress went away.

    Now that I'm barely scraping by, when I get stressed I think about buying a gun to put an end to it all. If I could afford one that is.

    1. Re: 6 figure stress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Steal the gun. What are they going to do? Shoot you?

    2. Re: 6 figure stress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A tank of nitrogen hooked up to a dry-cleaning bag that you have placed over your head and taped to your neck will let you check out painlessly and quickly with no mess. The burning sensation when you hold your breath comes from carbon dioxide, not lack of oxygen.

  49. Stress? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. MBA managers that know nothing except metrics and processes (both of which can and often fail, a lot, in the real world)
    2. Teammates that pander to this by playing the metrics and processes game instead of doing real work
    3. Excessive meetings
    4. H1B extensions. I get that bringing in foreign talent is a good thing for everyone everywhere, but the way the U.S. is doing it is just plain GREEDY. And before you try to call me racist, please know that I have friends that are H1B and colleagues that are as well that know their damn stuff and I'm proud to work with them. Doesn't change the fact the system IS being abused in other cases.
    5. Because IT is a cost, I have to FIGHT for raises. This is not the case for the guys in marketing and sales; when they do their work right and do it well, bam, bonuses, raises, and other perks.

    Makes me wonder why I haven't left the field entirely, tbqh. And I know I'm not alone in this. It's a goddamned sweatshop sometimes.

  50. I did it, and quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been there done that, with the exact reasons sited.

    Over 20 years of it. Granted some of them were awesome, with some incredible bosses and coworkers. But in the end, of constantly being "available", impossible dead lines, overwhelming work load, took it's toll. Premature grey hair, stress induced health issues, etc. I finally threw in the towel and walked away.

    Now, I'm working as a receptionist at a hair salon. With select side computer work. I have to say life is awesome. I'm happy, and generally stress free.

  51. Respect and thank your admin. You'll make his day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to make your admins day, just thank them for doing their job. Respect them like you would any other colleague. Realize that sometimes stuff just breaks, and it isn't anyones fault in particular. Support them in doing their job while they support the equipment that lets you do yours.

    These simple things can go a LONG way in alleviating the stress of your modern day IT administrator.

    I've been through a lot of sysadmin jobs over the years and I never really experienced much of above. I know none of it is a requirement for getting a paycheck at the end of the day, but the mental stress of being treated like a disposable tool to be hammered upon builds up after a while and gets old really quickly. I'm not sure why so many companies treat IT admins as inferior peons, but they do, and it's kind of sad.

    I landed up quitting and never turning back because of this. I'm sure if even a few people found it in their hearts to say "Hey, thanks for busting your balls getting my problem fixed, I really appreciate it!" I might still hold one of my former titles. Nobody ever really bothered though, so I said enough was enough and left. After the Nth job experiencing the same thing I decided I was done with that particular career choice.

    I now consult for VMware ESX/ESXi related virtualization (yeah, I know they call that crap the "cloud" today- it wasn't back then) and do some oddball jobs on a few ancient IBM mainframes just for fun (mostly self taught using Hercules 390). You'd be surprised how much people will pay for a COBOL or Fortran or JCL expert these days.

    But what really gets me is that as a consultant, people actually listen to my opinion and intuitions based on prior experience. I actually get thanked for being paid to do a job more now then I ever did as an IT admin. I get to travel and meet lots of people who treat me as a "specialist" who knows what they're doing, and not a troll who lives in an unfinished room with no ceiling and a bunch of noisy computers and doesn't know anything at all.

    So, seriously, if you want your IT admin to stay and do a good job- just thank them. Respect them, and they'll respect you. If they feel respected, then they'll be more opted to fix your problem ASAP or put in that little bit of extra effort when it's really required. It amazes me how so many people treat IT guys like trash, even though they're in charge of running the infrastructure that holds up the entire company.

  52. Lies, Damn Lies and Managers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Liars? How dare you suggest such a thing!

    The survey was completely anonymous and I answered every question as honestly as I could, well except for the very end when it asked for your gender, age and the department you worked for. I might of fudged that a little. There's a 7 year old girl, who hates his boss but is really happy to be working in marketing right now. But I would have been totally honest, if my manager didn't keep stressing me out about completing the survey.

  53. I eliminated stress by used2win32 · · Score: 2
    I changed my job to a support role.

    I now speak to users and IT on the phone and via remote connection software. Only 60K per year, but I telecommute 100% of the time now.

    Well worth the change

    --
    Procrastination; I'll think of a sig tomorrow.
  54. This is news how?? by skeezix-the-cat · · Score: 1

    Repeat: and this is news how?? *LOL*. Yep, slave to the dollar.

    --
    --I do what I can, I work in the dark.
  55. I believe you have my stapler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go Milton!

  56. This ^ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A well set up network should be almost invisible. My last gig the 2 network admins pretty much had a cake walk. Rollouts, security issues, and hardware issues are the only time you should see the admins, outside of planning meetings.

  57. DO IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damnit, I wish they would quit. I could get my job done.

  58. Dealing with management by PPH · · Score: 2

    Sounds right.

    I can deal with the PHBs, the MBA metric BS, theory X, theory Y, all sorts of management types with no problems. What really gets under my skin is the manager with some sort of side deal going on. They say, "You've got to improve your communications skills". I reply with, "If you've got something to communicate, put it in a memo. E-mail me. Leave a voice mail."

    "Insubordination!"

    When they want something done, but they can't leave any evidence, things get tense. And its not just in IT, but the opportunities are more abundant when upper management doesn't "get" rapidly changing technology.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  59. I considered it, then did it. by rwyoder · · Score: 1

    This is a big, well-known company, and there is a story related to it on the /. front page right now.
    The problems:

    - No network documentation whatsover.

    - IT dept fragmented into multiple competing divisions, and each division was
      sub-divided by device type. So there were no *network* engineers, there were
    "firewall engineers", "router/switch" engineers, etc, even though everything
    was interconnected. So no single network engineer could solve a problem, it
    always required dragging people from multiple divisions/depts into an issue.

    - Workload imposed on one person that should have been distributed across three.

    - Engineers not allowed to make any engineering decisions whatsoever.
        Nonsensical procedures mandated by management wasted huge amounts of time and
        staff, but no engineers were allowed input into the system.

    - Change control procedures that made it impossible to get the job done *and*
        follow mandated procedures. Everything required many levels of approval,
        but the approvers couldn't be bothered to approve in a timely manner,
        (if at all), and 50% of the time the change was never fully approved, so the
        only way to get the work done was to do it anyway and run the risk of getting
        caught in a change audit.

    - Clueless managers that believed every IT person is interchangeable and anyone
        can be dropped into any role, regardless of education, experience,
        certifications, or interest. e.g a network engineer with multiple Cisco
        certifications was expected to be a software developer, and a Linux admin,
        and not even allowed to work on Cisco equipment.

    I turned in my resignation several months ago.

    1. Re:I considered it, then did it. by noc007 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like it's AT&T.

  60. This is the true story by jacobsm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A stranger came to visit Chelm, together with his very old, very skinny cow. The mayor of Chelm insisted the stranger stay in his home during that time and even made room in his own barn for the cow. The stranger was a little worried about being in a strange town, so, he hid his gold in the straw in the barn under his cow.
    The next morning, the mayor walked into the barn to care for his animals, and he noticed the gold in the straw. He figured out that this cow, unlike all other cows, gave gold instead of milk. He was very excited!! He called a special meeting of the Chelm Town Council and insisted that they buy the cow from the stranger. They collected money from all the citizens in town. The mayor asked the stranger if he would be willing to sell the cow, and he offered double the usual price for a good milk cow. The stranger started to protest that the cow wasn't worth that much, but the mayor misunderstood and increased his offer. The more the stranger protested, the more the mayor offered. Finally, completely confused, the stranger agreed to sell. The mayor gave the scrawny cow the best stall in his barn. He fed her the very best feed in town. The next morning, the mayor approached the cow to milk her. As he started, he was very surprised to find that the cow gave...milk! And not even very good milk!! The mayor was annoyed. The stranger had sold him a cow that gave gold, but all he had gotten was milk! He reported back to the Town Council. They were angry. When they told the townspeople, everyone was furious! They decided to track down the stranger to get their money back. They found the stranger in the next town. With everyone yelling at him all at once, he had no idea what was going on, but eventually, he figured it out. He turned to the mayor and asked, "Did you feed the cow?" The mayor answered, "Of course we fed the cow! Do you think we don't know how to care for a cow?!!" The stranger answered, "Did you ever have a cow that gave gold before? Didn't you notice how scrawny she was when I came into town? There's only one way to get her to give gold... You have to stop feeding her! But, it took me weeks to teach her to not eat. This is what you have to do. Every day, feed her a little less. At the end of three weeks, you should be able to cut her down to eating nothing. The next day, milk her, and she will give gold again." The Chelmites look at the stranger, embarrassed about their previous anger at him. They return to Chelm and start the feeding regimen that the stranger told them. The cow got skinnier and skinnier, and the mayor of Chelm was very pleased. Until, one morning, on the very first day she would have gotten no food, the cow was found dead in her stall.

    The people of Chelm were, of course, very disappointed. But they always looked back nostalgically on the day when, if only their cow hadn't died, they would have been the richest town in Poland...

  61. Make way for profits! by Circuit_phreak · · Score: 2

    I worked for 9 years in the IT dept. of a car dealership with 17 stores, ALL IT done in house, 2 man dept, me as an "admin" and an "IT DIRECTOR" (self titled) with a god complex. We grew almost double the time I was there, and my pay actually decreased in gross the last 4 years I was there as they cut overtime, yet expected more work. I was a sysadmin, web developer, dba, cellphone trainer, and the personal repair tech to the 7 owners and their ungrateful privileged children. I finally said screw this, I am going to build furniture, being in the hospital 2 times a month for stress is not worth what the janitor makes. I was replaced with 2 people and half of my work was sent out of the company (all website work) it's all about the $$$.

  62. Re:Respect and thank your admin. You'll make his d by jacobsm · · Score: 1

    Really? How much? I'm a zOS Systems Programmer with over 34 years experience.

  63. The feld needs to be trades with apprenticeships by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    Electrical and plumbing have apprenticeships and rules that some PHB / VP can't make you passover / not follow.

    IT can do good with a apprenticeship system that let's people learn hands on and even give an manager if they take the same classes a much better view of the field then the CS theory based classes.

  64. Geekism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I think a large part of the problem is that geeks are almost never really jocks - they don't stand up for themselves and form unions of administrators or organize themselves. They just do what they're told.

    It doesn't help that it's not a very mature employment sector. There's no precedent to define what an administrator is exactly. So employers can try and push tech support duties onto admins, especially these days.

  65. no only engineers the workers on the ground also by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    no only engineers the workers on the ground also have levels of certification or accreditation standards, along with the professional ethical standards.

    also the workers doing the work don't go years of theroy based learning with little to no hands on work as part of the classes.

    At times engineers come up with stuff that looks good on paper but does not trun out that good on the ground level. (Still like that happens in IT they look at something and in theory it should work but on the ground level it does not or the ground level guys have to come up with hacks / workarounds to make it happen)

  66. This stress generates the IT culture of NO by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    A very common complaint that I hear from corporate types is that the IT department only has one answer and it is NO. I have always thought that this is due to the unbalanced pressure put on the typical IT department where their primary genuine performance review only comes when things blow up. It could have been 3 years of 100% up-time but a glitch during some critical sales presentation suddenly has the head of marketing calling for heads to roll in IT. You also get other negative feedback when the IT people "suddenly" need $100,000 worth of new servers (to replace the 10 year old existing ones that support 2,000 employees). The reason these are the performance reviews is that any traditional audits are simply incomprehensible to the non-technically minded management.

    This then also results in the IT staff assiduously avoiding taking on any additional risk. So when a department says, "we want BYOD" IT usually loses their minds as they know that even if they stand on their heads while explaining that they can not only not support 8,000 different types of devices but that there is a good chance that any given device might not work at all (Say the iPads not working with the 6 year old flash based timecard system). As far as the rest of the company is concerned this is just another strike against IT.

    At the same time I have experienced many IT people who become so risk adverse that this becomes a genuine risk to the company. Years ago I worked for a company that was switching from the drying up business of military contracting to large scale web based systems. Over 50 employees were sharing a pair of 256K ISDN lines and being forced to put a bizarrely set up Novell system on all our computers. The IT guy had a wall that was nearly completely covered with all his Novell certifications. My most glorious moment was when he ordered an awesome Dell server from hell and couldn't get Novell to install on it. He was on the speaker-phone with a senior Dell support guy when he told our IT guy that none of their best servers were compatible with Novell and this was a good thing as far as he was concerned.

    This is a very complex problem but without going into endless detail I have seen very unusual and creative solutions where both IT and the company can end up being a whole lot happier.

  67. RTM tester by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only significant IT job I had (barring a small stint in tech support) was RTM tester (Release to Manufacturing) - basically a QA tester job.
    If you want reasonable levels of stress, that's the way to go but you will have to find ways to desk warm or keep busy! Loved that job but sometimes I hated it when I actually had to do work like rip open a box, and reconfigure it, upgrade it, or carry out a s^&t load of testing in the fall for the Winter release candidates. A busy day would be putting new graphics cards into boxen, upgrading the RAM, and testing re-releases or new RC's, performing some CRC checks on cloned discs, and working late with bad free pizza. This was all pre-2008 of course!

    Actual new knowledge learned there - pretty much jack s$%t but it was 2 years of low stress. Left before they restructured.

  68. try sales support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I support sales departments,'getting rashes like someone here said its stress. I drink 10 cans of beer a night just to deal, throw up blood in the morning, have a constant fight waking up as well. A co worker in his 40s just died of a heart attack a few weeks ago. I need the paycheck. I am thinking about suicide all the time as I am single in my 30s and have never had a social life. It is hell.

    1. Re:try sales support by fazey · · Score: 1

      Or liver cirrhosis. Try not drinking for a while. See if those rashes go away.

  69. Score:4, Insightful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? This is "insightful"? Is slashdot, too, now filled with useless idiots?

    The answer to your fucking question is "none." Systems provisioning and accounts management are automated, or else you're a shitty systems administrator. You're an inexperienced infant, and one day you will discover that systems administrators' real job is to keep promises made by programmers. If even a simple majority of programmers, DBAs, or busint people were worth a shit at their jobs, you wouldn't need systems administrators.

    But that's not the case. We're the ones who make it work... and in the process, I make bank.

  70. Salary OT = slave labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather get paid by the hour and have the option to do OT if I wanted to than to be on salary. It sure is a shame that I live out in the country where cellphone "Dead zones" are prominent and there's no cable or phone connections there either. tsk tsk... What a shame indeed.

  71. lol by fazey · · Score: 1

    lol, I love that i'm reading this while being stuck at work due to an intended release on Monday, and we aren't done working out the issues.

  72. Half asleep, just read that as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "have considered quilting"

  73. I've nearly quit a few times by noc007 · · Score: 1

    My last job started out great and slowly degraded over time. Towards the end the "new" Chief Idiot Officer (CIO) had things on the brink of disaster and only through the skill that stuck around and sheer luck did things survive. I bidded my time while I looked for a job. After searching for a while and even expanding my search to neighboring states, I finally got the offer I was looking for. I was tempted to just toss my resignation to the HR lady, stop by the CIO. There I would tell him he's an idiot, that's what the "I" in his title stands for, and he can EABOD, GFY, and then ESAD. I didn't do any epic bridge burning because I didn't feel like it would have been right to do to my boss (not that he was perfect either, but he was ok) and the PFY. If my boss wasn't still there, I probably would have done that; the PFY can handle himself.

  74. $100k of equipment still unused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I walked out after pay cuts, verbal abuse and eventually getting boxes thrown at me by a Partner. Two years later they still have over $100k of equipment up and spinning and completely unused because said Partner never showed up for meetings he scheduled and he still won't let staff use this stuff until he has a meeting. This makes me happy.

  75. Quitting is for quitters. Real men BURN OUT. by surfcow · · Score: 1

    I had a monster job, did great, burned out, crashed, smoldered, collected unemployment, regrew, retooled, thrived, got the monster job, did great, burned out, crashed, smoldered, ...

    Larger, rinse, repeat.

    Where do I get off the dharma wheel?

  76. Most IT admins don't blaze it every day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It helps

  77. Re:Most X have considered quitting due to stress by andrea.sartori · · Score: 1

    I would have put it differently. Bad management is not unique to IT. Neither is the stress directly due to the nature of the job (social work, or anything else that puts you in touch with disadvantaged people... medicine... just name it. Which by the way gets to the same conclusion: most X have considered quitting due to stress. I know several (non-IT) people who did quit due to stress.

    --
    Mostly harmless.
  78. Work for the government then by gelfling · · Score: 1

    No expectations, no results. We pretend to work, they pretend to pay us.

  79. You need to unionize.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a developer that is in the OPEIU union (http://www.opeiu.org/) I typically just work 40 hours a week. We get paid hourly and Saturday is time and a half and Sunday is double time. Benefits are great. We don't get stock options, but I've been burned by those so many times it is ridiculous. The job is much more relaxed, but we still get plenty of work done. Because the company doesn't like to pay too much overtime, we tend to spend more time on design up front which leads to a better software. Since we are not all stressed out, we tend to write less bugs than in other places I've worked too. Overall, it is a much better work environment.

  80. Biggest Frustration by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    Is when they ask you to implement something you had ZERO input into. Usually there are about 5-10 other projects that really need to be done before their request can be done sanely, but you have to find workarounds to make what they want work NOW and then you have to REDO it all AGAIN once the other projects are done. Planning? Ain't nobody got time fo dat. SHOVE IT IN and who gives a fuck if it's your ass on the line....we'll fire your ass because we asked you to do somethign we shouldn't. Ain't no wonder I frickin hate my job at times.

    Plus then there's uptime. They want zero downtime but they don't want to actually PAY FOR IT. THA SUCK!

    --

    Gorkman

  81. The "Lateral move" move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have to agree with the "Managers creating stress" factor. I left two IT jobs because the managers were severe micro-managers. All of my requests and questions were always followed up with the same corporate drone answer I had been fed for 14 years. I stayed at the one company for 14 years because I didn't know better to leave. I was entirely stressed out and underpaid. They were a fan of the new position / lateral move where you have newer more challenging responsibilities, but the same pay. I had to put together a small presentation as to why I deserved more money. It worked, but it still did not get me to the median point in my field. So I left. I needed a less stressful environment and more money. It can be done if you have the skills. I am onto my second IT company since leaving, and I couldn't be happier. You just can't stay in one place for too long.

  82. so true by JC61990 · · Score: 1

    Its so true, ive been doing this for quite a few years now, im still in college finishing up my CS/IT degree, and to be honest i have been seriously thinking about switching my major to something unrelated to CS or IT. Ive been working in the field for at least 5 years now, ive done work in data centers, tech support (in house and phone) and when i just started i worked in a computer shop fixing pc's. Im only 23 and i can barely deal with the stress and b.s. that comes with the job(s). Computers are what i know best and always have, but really because of the work environment and people you work with, I really don't think this is what i want to do for the rest of my life.

  83. Same soup, just reheated... by nessman · · Score: 1

    Bottom line is this...

    a.) too many techies with titles and zero people or leadership skills masquerading as IT Managers or IT Directors
    b.) too many social outcasts working as IT people because they now have "power" over their oppressors
    c.) too many huge ego's in IT, plenty of backstabbing and people who will throw you under the bus to move their careers forward
    d.) the lack of upper management's understanding that a single disgruntled IT employee can and will destroy your company by:
    -- 1.) having full and unfettered access to everyone's e-mail, files, accounting systems, etc...
    -- 2.) changing all of the admin passwords and shutting all systems down 2 minutes before he quits
    -- 3.) dropping off a large stack of e-mails on the desk of the local newspaper editor
    -- 4.) stopping by the local FBI office with backup media from the last full system backup

    Too many companies don't realize how essential it is to hire a good IT Manager/Director with some sense of technical skills for the job - but isn't necessarily a technical wizard. Most importantly he/she will be a good leader that his or her subordinates will respect. Accordingly, this person will hire people with good people skills. Finally, no one person shall hold all the keys to everything. Giving your one and only "trusted" network administrator the admin passwords to everything is inviting disaster.

    I've dealt with my share of asshole IT Directors and other management types above me with no sense of leadership or people management skills. Along the way I've thrown a few of them under the bus as I made my way out the door without losing a minute's sleep over it. They deserved it.

    Bottom line - don't fuck with your IT people.

    1. Re:Same soup, just reheated... by toastedpenguin · · Score: 1

      a.) is so true it hurts. I am tired of senior management thinking someone with an advanced IT degree means they can manage because they are "smart", manage multiple departments because its "easier" for them and also manage a department they have no experience working in and then this person feels the need to micro manage work they know nothing about.

  84. The more things change ... by Dabido · · Score: 1

    When I was a Sys Admin (long time ago now Sheesh!) I was working 13 hour days with the occasional 23 or 24 hours day (usually following each other with an hours sleep in between). I was treated like crap. The managers used to tell people I was lazy and never did anything (which caused some of the other workers on occasion to abuse me and call me lazy). Then when I took a lesser position in another department for more money they had to replace me with four people. When one of them threatened to resign over the stress they gave him a huge pay rise.

    So, YES, managers are the problem. (Aren't they always?)

    Hearing this just tells me that everything has pretty much remained the same.

    --
    Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  85. 20 years of contracting by hicksw · · Score: 1

    You get paid to struggle with broken failing systems. All of the projects/systems I have ever been paid to struggle with have eventually failed. The managers went on the better, richer failing projects. I took the money and moved on.

    In the long run almost everything fails. If the last invoice was paid and the cheque cleared, it was a personal victory.

    Entropy is a nice word to stick in here somewhere.
    --
    It was a dark and drunken night. Four shots called out -- drink me.

  86. Contracted in to replace worker with heart attack by cpslash · · Score: 1

    I was contracted in to a sysadmin position once. The position opened up as the previous worker had a massive coronary. As I walked to my 'cube', I noted that the rest of workers seemed haggard, overweight, and overstressed. The work itself was incessant. You kept getting these 'work orders' from a computer system that tracked your every move. The manager kept coming by reminding us of our lagging productivity, and that we'd be fired if we didn't pick up the pace. One time, I left the laptop unattended on the desk. Security grabbed it. When I went over there to retrieve it, they threatened my physically with a veiled threat. When asked if I wanted to go 'perm', I said no thanks. My body said 'Thank God' to me. At the end of the six months, I was out of there.

  87. main stressors in job by jardos · · Score: 1

    Most of the issues raised in the article resonate with me. I was downsized from an IT Admin job a while ago. I was partially relieved when it happened. By the time I was let go I had high blood pressure, headaches, and a damaged tendon in my arm from typing so many emails and reports for management and others (in addition to the daily IT support tasks). The main stressors for me was a non-technical IT operations manager who wanted a report on everything using no technical jargon, (and at least a 30-60 minute meeting after any unexpected outage), an unspoken expectation that you had to work extra unpaid hours to get the work done, an under-budgeted and under-staffed IT dept, and a few difficult users. The general view from upper management was that the IT Dept is not a profit center. Therefore it should be funded and staffed to the minimum. Some people in other departments said I had the most difficult job in the company.

  88. Stress, and constant attacks on IT pay by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

    Can you think of any other field other than IT where being willing to put in the long hours that excellence sometimes demands results in efforts to dock your pay - but not those hours? That is incredible to me...to deliberately attempt to destroy the motivation of some of America's best and brightest. The results are easy to predict: Just project the same miserly approach upon America's research and development...upon American innovation, which an apt analog as so much of IT's efforts are aimed at doing something "better".

    The truth is the United States of America doesn't want to be the world's technology leader anymore...our nation's business leaders - and so their pets in Congress - just want to control the world through their control of the dollar.

    That goal is, in my opinion, unusually asinine even for a people and society increasingly constrained by greed given that the dollar can be blown to kingdom come with the simple declaration "Sorry, we don't take dollars anymore." (With the caveat that the statement must come from somebody who has the industrial infrastructure and position as a primary supplier in global trade required to back the value of their proposed dollar replacement.)

    That goal of controlling the world through the control of the dollar...it is an open admission that Corporate America's leaders and the politicians who represent them are aware that either they're too lazy or they lack the competence and talent to lead in any other way. Or both.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"