Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: How Do You Manage Your Passwords?

Albus Dumb Door writes "As an IT professional, I've got a problem common to many of you: dealing with a lot of passwords. Memorizing them all becomes harder with age and and an increasing number of passwords. I will forget them eventually. I am obviously unable to use something online, like Last Pass and 1Password. Using a single password for all the systems is also obviously out of the question. I know that there are a few apps for cell phones for managing passwords (like Phone Genie and mSecure), but a cell phone, unless it's kept in offline mode (and even then), is still a security risk and I'm pretty sure my employers wouldn't like me having their passwords on my cell phone. I've also taken a look at things like the YubiKey, but changing the authentication scheme of most of the systems is not an option. The only interesting option I've seen so far is the Pitbull Wallet, but they just started taking pre-orders on IndieGoGo and are not expected to deliver until August. Amazon has some hardware password managers as well, like the RecZone and Logio, but either the price or their reviews scared me away. So how do you guys prefer to manage your passwords and what do you recommend?"

275 of 445 comments (clear)

  1. Air Gapped Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's not portable, and this is just what I do at home so may not scale well to the office, but I've basically got an old intel atom box (MSI Wind PC) running linux (slackware) with no network connection and full disk encryption just using luks/dm-crypt. I keep passwords, banking numbers, and other bits of sensitive info on there. No fancy management software, just plain old text files. I have it hooked up through a KVM and I just leave it running all the time (with locked screen), so it's nothing to switch to it when I need to use an old password or update a password when I change one.

    Files are backed up locally using rsnapshot (for history), and then that's periodically copied to one of 2 (also encrypted) USB thumb drives (I leave on plugged in the back and periodically swap them).

    Primitive, but sometimes that's what works. You could probably do the same with a raspberry pi at this point (disk encryption might be fun though).

    Also this topic comes up like once a month, and the answer has not changed in years. Stop asking!

    Completely off topic: what would be the best way to physically disable the wifi capability of a device. Obviously you can disable in software, but I'm the paranoid sort, and would love a way of knowing that my IP web cam is not gonna be doing anything with that wifi antenna. Thinking maybe some kind of terminator or some other way of "absorbing" the signals.

    1. Re:Air Gapped Box by Lanforod · · Score: 2

      Find and physically remove the wifi chip?

    2. Re:Air Gapped Box by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      Some older laptops actually do have easily replaceable wifi modules (just unscrew and pry out), and if not, they still might have removeable antennae. Removing the antennae may not totally disable the wifi though.

    3. Re:Air Gapped Box by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      Can you disable in BIOS?

    4. Re: Air Gapped Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I use passwords made of components, separated by a delimiter betwixt components. The delimiters change pretty regularly. The components do not, and either readily remind me of the thing I'm trying to log in to, or are something from my distant past, license plate, an ex's address or #.

    5. Re:Air Gapped Box by scheme · · Score: 1

      Completely off topic: what would be the best way to physically disable the wifi capability of a device. Obviously you can disable in software, but I'm the paranoid sort, and would love a way of knowing that my IP web cam is not gonna be doing anything with that wifi antenna. Thinking maybe some kind of terminator or some other way of "absorbing" the signals.

      Find and remove the antenna for wifi. If that's not possible, make an impromptu faraday cage around the body of the camera. It won't completely block the signals but it should reduce it significantly.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    6. Re:Air Gapped Box by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      all macbooks have the wifi and bluetooth on a small card. you can open the bottom and pull out the card. the camera, I don't know. drill it out? probably wouldn't crack the glass.

    7. Re:Air Gapped Box by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Completely off topic: what would be the best way to physically disable the wifi capability of a device. Obviously you can disable in software, but I'm the paranoid sort, and would love a way of knowing that my IP web cam is not gonna be doing anything with that wifi antenna. Thinking maybe some kind of terminator or some other way of "absorbing" the signals.

      That's easy - dunk it in water. You'll obtain the exact functionality you are asking for.

    8. Re:Air Gapped Box by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Removing the antenna is no guarantee of disabling wifi. The antenna is a fairly efficient broadcast device, but if you remove it there's still wiring to the antenna mount that will radiate. Range will be reduced, so a spy will have to get closer, but removing the antenna is not a total solution.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    9. Re:Air Gapped Box by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 2

      Apple will remove the camera on any of their shiny things for $99.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    10. Re:Air Gapped Box by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      wow, really? link? I guess it could be a genius bar service. you could probably watch them do it, or afterwards you could peer into the camera hole and confirm that it's an empty socket.

    11. Re:Air Gapped Box by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Removing the antennae may not totally disable the wifi though.

      Generally it's not recommended to run any radio device with the antennae removed. If the device tries to transmit through the connector, all the output power will get reflected back to the module, potentially damaging it.

    12. Re:Air Gapped Box by Pino+Grigio · · Score: 1

      I have all of my passwords in a KeePass database. That KeePass database is written to a TrueCrypt volume and the TrueCrypt volume is in Crypted on my Dropbox. I also have the KeePass database on a USB key on my home PC. I plug it in when I need a password and unplug it when I'm done.

    13. Re:Air Gapped Box by allo · · Score: 1

      Why? Do you really assume some box connects to wifi, if you have some system without a driver installed and no credentials entered anywhere?

    14. Re:Air Gapped Box by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If you open it up you will probably find that internally there is a U.FL connector that a short wire attaches to, which then goes to an external antenna. Check that the outer part of it is ground and then put a blob of solder over the whole thing to short it out.

      Alternatively there are usually decoupling capacitors and other parts between the wifi chip and the antenna that can be removed. That works well if you have a PCB antenna. If you find out what wifi chip you have you can download a datasheet with a reference schematic, and 99 times out of 100 that is what is used in the product as well.

      A better solution is to simply de-power the wifi chip, but it depends if the camera will still work if the chip isn't responding any more. Some chips have separate digital and RF power pins, in which case you can just remove the RF power and it will still respond to keep the firmware happy. Removing power means cutting the trace on the PCB, or lifting the pin if it has pins. Not easy as most modern wifi chips are no-lead devices.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Air Gapped Box by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Yo dawg...I put some encryption in your encryption so you can be encrypted while you encrypt.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  2. passwords.txt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    on my desktop.

    1. Re:passwords.txt by danxx · · Score: 1

      Open it with vim, put this text at the bottom:

      # vim: set cryptmethod=blowfish:

      Then type:

      :X [press-enter]
      :w [press-enter]

      It will prompt you for the password twice and voila! Instant encrypted database. Vim Heaven.

  3. Keepass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    extensible, open source, active project...what's not to like?

    1. Re:Keepass by jakeguffey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Came here to say this.

      I've used KeePass (or, in my case, KeePassX since I'm on *NIX) for about 6 years and it's been great. Encrypted local storage that I can sync between devices if I want, with an Android app (KeePassDroid) available makes life easy. It's also the only approved password storage method where I work.

    2. Re:Keepass by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      So, do you put the keyfile in your Dropbox folder, or no? If so, how is that more secure than using a password? Otherwise, do you just manually move it to different devices with a thumb drive or email, or what?

    3. Re:Keepass by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 3, Informative

      The keyfile is in my dropbox folder, I have dropbox installed on all my devices. On the iphone or ipad I just need to select the keepass file and it will open in the keepass app.

      Then my passphrase is required to open the encrypted file that contains the list of my passwords.

      This step is only required on my iphone/ipad if the keystore is out of sync with the dropbox folder. Otherwise the file remains cached on my portable device.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    4. Re:Keepass by kwalker · · Score: 1

      Same here. I use KeePassX, other members of my team use KeePass on Windows or Mac. I also use KeePassDroid on my Android phone. The database is compatible between all versions, and encrypted so it can be stored on a file share (In our case, our departmental drive). I also use ownCloud to sync it automatically between devices whenever a password is updated.

      I don't use the plugins though. I don't need to. KeePassX allows me to auto-type in named windows by hitting a global hot-key. Very useful.

      --
      ... And so it comes to this.
    5. Re:Keepass by gmuslera · · Score: 4

      Also works or have alternatives that use the same data files for most OSs, including mobile ones. You can backup/sync your password file between devices using online services while have a secure enough master password for it. Of course, you must keep in mind that if you have a keylogger in the device you are using that password file it will become compromised. Maybe having different password files for different uses would make it safer.

    6. Re:Keepass by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      I use Keepass.

      I store my keepass database on dropbox, this way it is accessible from my iphone, ipad and all my laptops and desktops. Any changes I make are synchronized between devices automatically.

      Keepass will auto fill in websites with plugins like KeeFox for Firefox, or launch Putty.

      I don't even know what my Slashdot, eBay or Amazon passwords are, as they are all about 64 random characters each.

      If you choose to go this route, it makes sense to have a very strong passphrase, as such, my passphrase exceeds 128 bits. A key file is also an excellent option.

      Why not both? KeePass allows you to do that.

      I also use KeePass (despite how silly the name looks when it's not properly capitalized :) but I use both a strong passphrase and a keyfile, then keep the KP database on Dropbox. The keyfile is manually transferred to any computer or device that I want to access Keepass from, so even if someone scrapes my DropBox, they can crack away at the database all they want, they still don't have the keyfile needed to decrypt it... I guess if someone gets my phone or laptop, they'll have the keyfile and a copy of the KP database, but still not my (pretty strong) passphrase.

      Meh. It's secure enough for my needs :)

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    7. Re:Keepass by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      So, do you put the keyfile in your Dropbox folder, or no? If so, how is that more secure than using a password? Otherwise, do you just manually move it to different devices with a thumb drive or email, or what?

      I don't, but opinions vary on this. For me it's no big deal to transfer the keyfile offline to any device that I would want to use, but 90% of the time it's one of two devices (phone, laptop). I always have my phone with me, so I always have my keyfile with me too if I need access from a different device...I suppose if I accidentally dropped both of them off a mountain somewhere, then I'd be hooped until I could get home again and grab the keyfile from my secure backups :)

      AS to the how, well bluetooth works *sometimes* for small file transfers, and if the bluetooth is wonky, I break out my connection cable. I also have a slick little cable that lets me plug a USB thumb drive into my android phone, so it's easy to push a file to a thumb drive, then use the thumb drive to put it wherever you like...also works great for photos / music / etc.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    8. Re:Keepass by idji · · Score: 1

      I also use keypass+dropbox+iphone+Minikeepass.
      Why is a keyfile an excellent option? If you only have 500,000 files on your computer (I bet you have less on your iphone), it can't take long to try them all - that is less secure than a 6 digit PIN, isn't it?
      Or do you mean keyfile+passphrase? But isn't the effort to find the path of the keyfile more clicking/typing than an extra 6 digits??

    9. Re:Keepass by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Ditto. Worth mentioning since no one has so far that the password list is heavily encrypted (including multi-pass encryption to ensure that any attempt to brute-force it requires many seconds or minutes per guess to attempt the decryption), so you only need to remember a single password for the vault to keep the stored passwords secure. You also have the option of using a separate multi-KB keyfile to increase security even further - i.e. you need password vault on computer + keyfile on USB + password in head to open it.

      It also has multiple techniques available for using passwords directly from the vault - autotyping login information when a hotkey is pressed (account used based on window title), copy-and-pasting with automatic clipboard clearing after paste, and I think a hybrid mode that invisibly does bits and pieces from both so that neither clipboard monitoring nor keylogging alone can catch your credentials. IIRC it also uses custom obfuscated text controls that ensure that your passwords are never stored in plaintext anywhere in its memory space, even if you've disabled the ****s to display them onscreen.

      I keep the password vault on my flash drive along with Windows, mac, and linux versions of the software so I can access it pretty much everywhere. All that's missing is a smartphone app that lets you plug in your phone as a "keyboard" to auto-type those long random passwords when you're logging directly into to a system in the server room. And honestly I haven't checked lately.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    10. Re:Keepass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Combine this with a keyfile that is not stored on the online syncing service. So if the keydb itself is obtained, it's useless without the keyfile (never put online) and the keyphrase. If someone obtains your phone or other device, they'll have the keydb and keyfile but not the keyphrase. Of course, nothing will protect you if your device is compromised (i.e. file access + keylogging) without your knowledge.

    11. Re:Keepass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree, keepass runs on just about everything, Linux, Winblows, Mac, Android, and some phones. The database is locally securely stored and backups to a flash drive make it transferable across OS's. Lots of flexibility in the options.
        http://keepass.info/

    12. Re:Keepass by FuzzNugget · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yup, I've used a number of password managers over the years and this one is easily one of the best. There's just no reason not to use it.

      There are ports for just about everything, including Android, which is incredibly handy.

      I particularly like the Firefox extension (KeeFox), which can be configured to automatically enter credentials as well as save new credentials entered in Firefox with one click.

    13. Re:Keepass by supertall · · Score: 1

      I've kept my passwords in an AxCrypt encrypted spreadsheet forever - think I'll migrate to KeepAss now. Linux, Windows and Android clients? Perfect.

    14. Re:Keepass by Dadoo · · Score: 1

      what's not to like?

      That fact that it's not multi-user? I'd like to see a (possibly web-based) password manager that can be used by an entire IT department, to keep track of all the passwords on the network.

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    15. Re:Keepass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look at http://keepass.info/help/base/multiuser.html

    16. Re:Keepass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And if you're worried about having a weak master password, use a YubiKey programmed with a 40-odd character string. If you're worried about losing both the USB key and YubiKey then append a few characters to the end of the YubiKey-generated string.

    17. Re: Keepass by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agree.

      I use KeePassX on my desktop, workstation and laptop (all Funtoo Linux), and KeePassDroid on my mobile.

      In addition, I've been playing with BTsync lately. I've found it invaluable for my password.kdb file.

    18. Re:Keepass by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      That's what I was also going to suggest. I've got a Keepass-client on my desktop, laptop, tablet and phone and the database itself is synced through ownCloud, so it always stays in sync on all the devices. Plus, ownCloud automatically makes backups of the database so if it should get corrupted I can just revert to the previous version. I find that combination to be pretty much unbeatable.

    19. Re:Keepass by Dadoo · · Score: 1

      Calling that "multi-user" is stretching it a little...

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    20. Re:Keepass by Monoman · · Score: 1

      Yep. Plenty of choices.

      Keepass
      Password Corral
      Password Safe
      TrueCrypt

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
    21. Re:Keepass by Scryer · · Score: 2

      I exchange the Keepass password file by superencrypting it with a (presumably) strong encryption algorithm before stuffing it up into the cloud. That should make it easier to break into my house physically than ripping my keys.

    22. Re:KeePass by bazmonkey · · Score: 1

      I second this one. The keyfile sits on a USB drive on my keychain to provide safe, synchronized two-factor access across multiple machines.

    23. Re:Keepass by natslovR · · Score: 1

      Just about everything, but unfortunately does not include ChromeOS. Rather than converting to some other tool I'm holding out that a ChromeOS version will come along some day soon, and for the moment, since I don't take my Chromebook outside of my home I'm ok to just RDP to my main PC and use it there.

    24. Re:Keepass by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      "Calling that "multi-user" is stretching it a little..."

      Well, do what I do, each user can use the portable version, self-contained and easily movable to wherever they want to store it. And you just need to copy the database file over to the android, etc. clients. I checked other solutions, but there's just no other that is offline + easy to move, port and backup + cheap (free is pretty cheap).

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    25. Re:Keepass by John.Banister · · Score: 2

      I think there could be a market for a hybrid between YubiKey and the inexpensive ($10-$20) usb stick fingerprint scanners available. If it acted like YubiKey does now but only released the password string on receipt of the fingerprint biometric information used to store it, that could also reduce the worry about losing the key. With also a battery and an RFID transceiver, the same losable key could be used for cars and doors.

    26. Re:Keepass by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Those cheap fingerprint scanners are really, really easy to fool.

      A USB keypad, like those you can get for laptops that don't have a numpad, but which allows you to enter a long pin number securely would be good. Your keyboard might be logged but unless someone can physically access the hardware the USB keypad should be secure (keystrokes would not be sent to the PC).

      You can buy HDD enclosures with a keypad on them but I think their security is weak, unfortunately.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:Keepass by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, do you find that they're really, really easy to fool for just anyone, or are they only easy to fool for smart people?

    28. Re:Keepass by streampotato · · Score: 2

      Yes. I use Keepass on my Ubuntu desktop, Windows 8 notebook (don't judge me,) and Moto X. While my db requires a password and is sync'd on Dropbox, I have a keyfile locally on each device.

    29. Re:Keepass by jpvlsmv · · Score: 1

      The one feature I wish it had was a USB-HID (I'd even settle for a BT/HID) emulator so that it could act as a USB keyboard to type when I have my phone plugged in. Unfortunately, none of the phone platforms will allow you to do that (easily)

    30. Re: Keepass by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      It doesn't auto submit the login by default. You can manually review the entered credentials before logging in.

  4. Text File with GPG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I just use a simple text file and gpg.

    1. Re:Text File with GPG by lesuth · · Score: 1

      I just use a simple text file and gpg.

      Exactly how I manage my passwords. No browsers to fail or be compromised, no phones to lose / break / be compromised, and no paper copies. With multiple (tons of?) OS and embedded OSes around, as long as one has my .gpg file... no problem!

    2. Re:Text File with GPG by allo · · Score: 1

      a simple script to decrypt to /tmp (tmpfs) and encrypt it after reading/editing. So there is no trace of the decrypted file on the harddrive

    3. Re:Text File with GPG by eneville · · Score: 1

      I have a series of gpg'd text files, usually, for things like godaddy, storing username=password. More notes really. The only way I can think of to store my personal data.

    4. Re:Text File with GPG by eneville · · Score: 1

      /tmp is disk on most distros. If you want to destroy the traces of it then you might want to use something like shred. If you have a specialist SSD for your /tmp then you may find that shred isn't good enough due to the internal RAID of the block device (see FusioIO), if you're paranoid. /tmp on Solaris is in RAM.

    5. Re:Text File with GPG by allo · · Score: 1

      here it is tmpfs, because i want it to be.
      You can use /dev/shm, which is always tmpfs on modern systems.

      do not rely on shred, it does not work on journaling filesystems. You may end up with writing 25 times to unused blocks, because the journal tries to keep the operations atomic.

  5. Write them down. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For work, write them down on physical paper and keep them in your physical wallet.

    You'll notice if your wallet goes missing.

    For home, write them down on physical paper and keep that somewhere safe.

    1. Re:Write them down. by Anrego · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For an extra layer of security, come up with some really basic cypher that you can do in your head. It doesn't have to withstand rigorous cryptanalysis, just has to hold up long enough for you to notice your wallet is missing and change all your passwords.

      Even something silly like taking the third character and sticking it on the end is probably enough.

    2. Re:Write them down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even better, write them down wrong. Use a random password with a trivial cipher that "you know" and can do in your head. Like add 2 characters to each one, ignore the first 2 and last 4 characters. replace the end characters with A and B.

      Anything you can come up with.

      This dramatically lowers the potential damage if they're lost (since they're not instantly usable).

    3. Re:Write them down. by msauve · · Score: 2

      If your passwords are in your wallet, and your wallet is missing, how do you change your passwords? Not everything with a password will email you a new random one.

      And, you still need to have a list of all the accounts which have passwords somewhere, so you know what needs to be changed.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    4. Re:Write them down. by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds good.

      And you might also want to keep a few additional passwords on that piece of paper. For those circumstances where you're suddenly required to have a new one (X characters, Y capitals, Z numerals) for a new application or whatever. Always nice to have one ready instead of trying to think one up on the spot.

    5. Re:Write them down. by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      A list of services in a text file with no meaning or obvious connection to the passwords written down would be easy enough. Maybe split them up have the services they are used for stored somewhere and the passwords written down with no connection to the service they are used for. That way someone who takes the wallet would get a piece of paper with crap written on it and no way to know what it's for.

    6. Re:Write them down. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If your passwords are in your wallet, and your wallet is missing, how do you change your passwords?

      If they're in your wallet then they're work passwords. So you contact the other admin and have her change your passwords.

      And, you still need to have a list of all the accounts which have passwords somewhere, so you know what needs to be changed.

      And for work this should be documented already. Along with reset procedures and contact numbers.

      For home, having them stolen is less of a risk. But you can always keep a copy (encrypted or not) with someone else in your family or a trusted friend or a safety deposit box. You're probably more at risk of them being destroyed in a fire or something. So treat them the same as any other important document.

    7. Re:Write them down. by Archimonde · · Score: 2

      That's pretty much what I do during my contract on the ship. I don't have a wallet, but have a pocket notebook and there I write down the network configuration, some usernames/passwords for some servers etc (every ship is different). With time, I remember all of this stuff so I destroy the papers anyway.

      I never write down which credentials are used for what, this is what I know, and always add some logical sounding letters/number to every piece of information but in some way that I always know what is garbage and what is real information. If I lose the notebook I don't think anyone onboard would be able to figure out what information is used for what, and also what piece of garbage to remove. Even if someone would be resourceful enough to do it, I would still have a much better head start because I would notice that my notebook is missing and I would have plenty of time to change the passwords.

      All of this is much better than having a document on a usb drive with your password list which has to be decrypted every time you want to read it. Of course, all of the info and much more is stored on some document which is encrypted for safekeeping.
       

      --
      Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
    8. Re:Write them down. by skastrik · · Score: 1

      Corecthorsebatterystapler

    9. Re:Write them down. by code_muncher_nerd · · Score: 1

      Using paper makes alot of sense if you don't trust your devices. Paper is offline, cheap and portable. Making up your own password can be a pain though. I've been toying with a generator that spits out a random set of characters, mapped onto a pin pad. That lets me use a PIN that I already know to form a random password. It gets printed and put away. I've been trialing it with some friends, with interesting results. People who trust their devices will not bother (they have more convenient options); having to use the printer seems to be a deal breaker; people don't like to admit that their passwords suck, and lastly the concept is not obvious to the average person. You can see the prototype at http://pinsavvi.com/pinpad/.

    10. Re:Write them down. by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      A cipher or a PIN

      Write down the unique part, and remember the 4-digit appendage.

  6. LastPass by ZerXes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is LastPass not an option? The password database is always synced to your laptop/cellphone so there is no problem accessing your passwords when you are offline. The security is the most robust I have found when it comes to password management, especially when you use 2-factor auth.

    1. Re:LastPass by neiras · · Score: 2

      That and Lastpass encrypts/decrypts the password store on the client side. Only the encrypted database is ever sent over the wire. It's not perfect, but Lastpass has been great for me. Worth the $12/year. I don't know any of my passwords now except one, and my yubikey protects the Lastpass master password.

    2. Re:LastPass by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Or 1Password. You can use an iPhone or Android phone. The data is encrypted. Yes, the NSA can probably get to it, no they probably wont bother. Should be adequate for most users. If you lose the phone and you're worried about somebody breaking the encryption you can log into DropBox (or whoever you have the file stored with) and delete it or just change the password from another device.

      Not perfect, but pretty damned good and a hell of a lot more user friendly than some of the Totally Paranoid suggestions around here.

        If you need security beyond this level, you should hone up on your ninja skills, get a bodyguard and not sleep in the same bed twice.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:LastPass by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What if they are required by the NSA (along with the "don't disclose that we are asking this") to give them your passwords? Giving the control to an US company could go very wrong. Even Hushmail that promised to have all your information encrypted gave it to the feds... and they are Canadians.

    4. Re:LastPass by AdamWill · · Score: 5, Informative

      They can't, because they don't have them. They have a bunch of encrypted blobs.

    5. Re:LastPass by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      From TFA you cite:

      "However, installing Java and loading and running the Java applet can be annoying. So in 2006, Hushmail began offering a service more akin to traditional web mail. Users connect to the service via a SSL (https://) connection and Hushmail runs the Encryption Engine on their side. Users then tell the server-side engine what the right passphrase is and all the messages in the account can then be read as they would in any other web-based email account.

      The rub of that option is that Hushmail has — even if only for a brief moment — a copy of your passphrase. As they disclose in the technical comparison of the two options, this means that an attacker with access to Hushmail’s servers can get at the passphrase and thus all of the messages."

      Hushmail was aware of the weakness of the server-side option and explicitly told its customers about it. These customers, foolishly given what they were doing, accepted that.

      Lastpass doesn't have the same problem; you don't need anything messy to do the client-side encryption and decryption. There is no server-side 'option' for Lastpass, nor would anyone have a reason to use it if there was one, really.

    6. Re:LastPass by danlor · · Score: 3, Informative

      The select the option on the website that allows you store your database in europe. (requires paid version currently)

      https://lastpass.com/use_eu.ph...

    7. Re:LastPass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They can't, because they don't have them. They have a bunch of encrypted blobs.

      Until they issue a 'patch' for the client, dumbass.

    8. Re:LastPass by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Lastpass doesn't have the same problem; you don't need anything messy to do the client-side encryption and decryption. There is no server-side 'option' for Lastpass, nor would anyone have a reason to use it if there was one, really.

      How do you know? I mean really, how do you know they aren't sending up your passphrase?

      Even if they're not now, how do you know they won't? If TLA government agency asks them to, do you think they wouldn't issue an app update that sent them your passphrase? Assuming you trust them today, will you decline every app update?

      I'm just playing devil's advocate here, but they're valid points. If the submitter is in an industry where "obviously" he can't use Lastpass, then I'm assuming these are operationally valid concerns.

    9. Re:LastPass by Nimey · · Score: 1

      That gets you nothing yet. The German datacenters aren't under EU law yet, because Lastpass does not yet have a European subsidiary that operates under those laws.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    10. Re:LastPass by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      So they claim, but since LastPass is closed source you are taking their word for it. Maybe they can request that the client sends them the key on demand, or they deliver you a special version that leaks the data. Hushmail had the same problem and even admitted that they could be compelled to send someone a compromised client (their's was Java web based).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:LastPass by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Won't protect you from the NSA, or the NSA's bitch GCHQ. They just hack the servers of companies they want to target, like LastPass. Even if they couldn't be bothered a National Security Letter to the US head office would soon get that data, I'm sure.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:LastPass by pahles · · Score: 1

      You do know that simply deleting something on Dropbox does not delete it? You can revert the deletion and even versions are kept.

      --
      Sig?
    13. Re:LastPass by CauseBy · · Score: 2

      since LastPass is closed source you are taking their word for it.

      I see comments like this all the time on Slashdot. The implication is that if you aren't willing to do the following, then you are an idiot who can expect zero security:

      1. Get a dual PhD in electrical engineering and computer security.
      2. Build your own personal chip manufacturing plant with no contractors or help of any kind, because one of them could be a spy.
      3. Personally develop your own CPU instruction set and personally implement it on a chip using your personal manufacturing plant.
      4. Personally develop your own computer language with absolute perfect security, which you personally audit because you are a PhD in computer security
      5. Write your own software stack for keeping passwords.
      6. Run your software, written in your language, on a computer built in your manufacturing plant.
      7. Do all this in a physically security building which, again, you personally built with no help from anyone else, because they could be spies.

      I suggest that you consider the possibility that there could be levels of security which are adequate and trustworthy short of that standard. But, while you consider that, I give you props for, apparently, being the only human on the plant to complete those 7 steps, who has a password wallet which requires no trust of anyone else ever anywhere in the chain. Congratulations to you, but the rest of us are too busy to do that.

  7. There is but one true password manager by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1, Informative

    Get 1Password. There is a version for every platform, including mobiles. It stores your full logins and integrates with popular browsers: just click a toolbar icon, enter the one master password you have to remember, and you can log onto MightyMegaBank just by clicking on its name. The program will also optionally generate big random passwords to replace the short crappy ones that you used to be able to remember.

    1. Re:There is but one true password manager by sconeu · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can understand not reading TFA, but did you even RTFS? What part of

      I am obviously unable to use something online, like Last Pass and 1Password.

      were you unable to understand?

      Now, I have absolutely no idea why poster "obviously" is unable to use it, but it's already ruled out.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:There is but one true password manager by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 4, Informative

      every platform.... except desktop linux?

    3. Re:There is but one true password manager by rk · · Score: 2

      This is called "challenging the assumptions." You, he, (and I for that matter) agree that it's not obvious why he's unable to use it. If the article poster is unaware that LastPass or 1password can work completely offline, then perhaps that information would change why they're ruled out. He might have another reason, but since it's not as obvious to us as it is to him, it's more than fair to raise it, especially when you're getting the advice for free.

      Personally, I only tolerate not being able to question assumptions when I'm getting paid to do it, and even barely at that. :-)

    4. Re:There is but one true password manager by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 5, Informative

      Because the OP is totally wrong, is why. 1Password keeps its data file locally. There are all kinds of synchronization features, which you don't have to use if you want to avoid online operations.

      OP may have been thinking of 1PasswordAnywhere, which is the all-online version.

    5. Re:There is but one true password manager by sconeu · · Score: 2

      Because the story poster said, 1password was off the table.

      Instead of just saying, "Use 1password", you should have challenged the assumption, and asked *WHY is it off the table?*, and then gone on with the benefits. Applehu Akbar also never mentioned its offline capabilities.

      In addition, the subject line "There is but one true password manager" smacked of fanboism. It sounded like, "I don't care what story poster said, I like mine."

      I'm quite willing to take my lumps, now that the false assumption in the story/summary was pointed out. Applehu should also be willing to take his for the flaws in his near first post.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:There is but one true password manager by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      Beat me to it.

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    7. Re:There is but one true password manager by tepples · · Score: 1

      Install it into the Android SDK device simulator.

    8. Re:There is but one true password manager by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      You're a fucking idiot. There are other options for password management in Linux. Just because this company chooses not to support it, doesn't mean anything.

  8. Algorithms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have a unique password for every domain I log into. I created an algorithm based on the domain i'm visiting. So I only have one algorithm to remember. The interesting part is when I have to change my password. I just have to try and keep track of the increments in my head to feed back into the algorithm.

  9. Keepass by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Keepass.

    I store my keepass database on dropbox, this way it is accessible from my iphone, ipad and all my laptops and desktops. Any changes I make are synchronized between devices automatically.

    Keepass will auto fill in websites with plugins like KeeFox for Firefox, or launch Putty.

    I don't even know what my Slashdot, eBay or Amazon passwords are, as they are all about 64 random characters each.

    If you choose to go this route, it makes sense to have a very strong passphrase, as such, my passphrase exceeds 128 bits. A key file is also an excellent option.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  10. Why by Liquidretro · · Score: 2

    Why are you unable to use one of the online systems like Lastpass? It's been very well vetted, offers offline and online modes. I personally find 1pass to be very Mac centric and expensive but it's a good product too. Keypass is a good opensource alternative, although its a local program so there are those downsides. It has android and iOS apps too so you can have access on a mobile device if needed.

    1. Re:Why by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I like KeyPass because the same database file can be used in my Android phone and on me PC. I don't want to use a cloud based password storage as that might be a vulnerability. I also like that KeyPass allows you to use more than just a password to protect the database, you can also have it use a keyfile. So it turns into something you know (the password) and something you have (the keyfile on a USB key). Then you just need to keep the database synchronized between the different systems you use it on. That could be a problem if you add passwords very frequently, but in my useage it has not been a problem. KeePassDroid is a nice Android version.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    2. Re:Why by Liquidretro · · Score: 1

      I like KeyPass because the same database file can be used in my Android phone and on me PC. I don't want to use a cloud based password storage as that might be a vulnerability. I also like that KeyPass allows you to use more than just a password to protect the database, you can also have it use a keyfile. So it turns into something you know (the password) and something you have (the keyfile on a USB key). Then you just need to keep the database synchronized between the different systems you use it on. That could be a problem if you add passwords very frequently, but in my useage it has not been a problem. KeePassDroid is a nice Android version.

      Cloud isn't a concern as long as your software is done right. By all accounts Lastpass has been done well. The cloud only gets an encrypted blob. Let the NSA go to town on it, not a concern. So do you manually sync your phone to PC then with your keypass DB?

    3. Re:Why by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      I like KeyPass because the same database file can be used in my Android phone and on me PC. I don't want to use a cloud based password storage as that might be a vulnerability. I also like that KeyPass allows you to use more than just a password to protect the database, you can also have it use a keyfile. So it turns into something you know (the password) and something you have (the keyfile on a USB key). Then you just need to keep the database synchronized between the different systems you use it on. That could be a problem if you add passwords very frequently, but in my useage it has not been a problem. KeePassDroid is a nice Android version.

      My dually-encrypted KP database is the one and only sensitive file I entrust to Dropbox, since even if someone gets it, they'll have to crack both the keyfile and the passphrase to get anything out of it. That does a lovely job of keeping your database in sync for you, since Dropbox clients are pretty much everywhere :)

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    4. Re:Why by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      It's really just a file that you copy back and forth between the two. I have recently placed it up on my Google Drive location as a backup in case my phone is lost or the microSD gets damaged. Then I could copy it down to my PC and in the KeePass there just open that file with the same password and keyfile and everything is there.

      As for Lastpass and the cloud storage? I can see that the file is an encrypted blob, same as the KeePass file, but what about while it is opened to look up a password? Do these cloud based password systems open it and display all your passwords in the browser? That would be the point I would be concerned with. Plus, the password to open it would need to be sent and could be captured to be used later by NSA or by Lastpass employees. If the encrypted blob is sent to your computer and opened locally, then there would be less concern of interception and it would seem similar to keeping the KeyPass file in Dropbox or something. But in that case I would not see how the local PC can open it without local software, unless it is a javascrip app running in the browser or something. I guess I am not very educated in how the cloud based password storage works since I don't want to trust the cloud to my passwords.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
  11. "Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by immaterial · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe I'm an idiot but I don't get why these options are obviously bad. I use 1Password on a regular basis.

    1. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by andrews · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't see the "obviously" either. I use 1Password and it's not web based, the secure password database file sits in Dropbox and is synced to all my computers and my iPhone. Works great.

    2. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the file is encrypted before it goes on dropbox, then its as secure as your encryption. And if you don't trust any encryption, then why are you trusting any website with any data that would require you to put up a password to protect?

    3. Re: "Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by shitzu · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Here's an idea - you can NOT put 1password db on dropbox and still use 1password

    4. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2

      more info please. I got the email yesterday, but I didn't see how it related to the NSA.

      thanks.

    5. Re: "Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by Roadstar · · Score: 1

      Indeed. While 1Password does provide the possibility to sync via Dropbox, you can also choose to use a local database and handle possible mobile sync via local wifi. That's what I did back in the day when they didn't have the Dropbox sync as an option. No, I'm not in any way affiliated with AgileBits. Just a long-time 1Password user.

    6. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by chihowa · · Score: 1

      What if he doesn't trust the implementation of the encryption in the password manager? That's hardly the same thing as not trusting any encryption.

      There's a pretty big leap from not wanting to expose your password database to unnecessary risk by handing it directly to your adversaries to not using any websites at all.

      Do you guys really think about things this simplistically?

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    7. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by unrtst · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What if he doesn't trust the implementation of the encryption in the password manager?

      These "what if's" are getting a bit silly. I'm not saying he should trust that implementation, but if he has reason not to, I'd hope that he's also smart enough (or believes he is) to pick an encryption scheme he does trust. We're really just talking about how paranoid someone wants to get with passwords that will be used on a lot of hosts, many of which are problem secured weakly. IE. seems like you're trying to create a flow chart out of this thread :-)

      * 1password +dropbox or similar stuff? - don't trust dropbox
      * 1password + your own sync or backup? - don't trust 1password encryption
      * clipperz + your own sync or backup (btw, clipperz is open source)? - not sure what you/he may not trust
      * name-your-own-encryption + a text file? - maybe you don't trust your own network connected OS
      * any of those, put inside a vm?
      * any of those, put inside a vm using full disk encryption in the vm?
      * ... with the vm files mounted via loopback encrypted again?
      * any of those on separate hardware (Raspberry Pi, an old android phone, HDMI dongle PC, etc)? ... this list can keep getting longer and longer.

      The orig question was "what do you use?", not "what should I use if I'm a paranoid schizophrenic that doesn't trust anything, especially the aliens that keep talking to me in my sleep?"

      To answer the orig question: I use an encrypted text file. I occasionally check out some of the offerings out there like lastpass, keepass, clipperz, etc, and even recommend those to others, but my simple encrypted text file has served me well for a long long time, and it is by far the fastest interface there is (vim). There is a security risk with it - one could do memory scraping while it's open to read the buffers, or use a key logger to snag the password for the master key, etc; and there's portability issues - it's trivial for me to get access setup once I'm on a linux OS anywhere in the world, but I don't always have that on me, and that hasn't been a problem.

    8. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      How do you know 1Password is secure? It is closed source, could be doing anything. Even the name smells like a scam, obviously designed to come first in any alphanumeric sort algorithm on a crapware site like cnet.

      It's also really expensive. $50 for something that you can get for free in the form of Keepass, complete with Dropbox sync and mobile versions.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by Ledgem · · Score: 1

      1Password has been around for years. We can't get around the fact that it's closed source, but they often write articles about their encryption implementations and participate in the encryption community. They're a good company.

      The big debate about password managers like 1Password is a bit philosophical. A password manager represents a single point of failure where you could lose everything in one go. On the other hand, it makes generating, managing, and routinely changing other passwords a breeze. Which is more likely to be breached? If you're a high-profile figure then a password manager could be pretty dangerous. If you're an average user then it's more likely that a password of yours will be cracked in a database breach. Having a password manager makes it easier to ensure that your passwords are all unique, that they don't contribute anything of value to password-cracking dictionaries, and it's a quick process to generate a new, random, long password to replace the old one.

    10. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by chihowa · · Score: 1

      You're misunderstanding the concerns raised further up the thread. It's not insane to think that putting sensitive materials (which, presumably, your password database is) on cloud services is of questionable judgement.

      There are also orders of magnitude more shoddy implementations of encryption than sound implementations (even if the underlying scheme is solid). Relying entirely on the security of someone else's encryption (especially if you don't have the understanding and ability to verify it) is very naive.

      Putting these two observations together is hardly limited to the mind of paranoiacs. If you want to blow this out of proportion by comparing it to aliens, memory scraping, and VMs within VMs, then you're being intellectually dishonest.

      Putting sensitive stuff on Dropbox is like storing your lockbox full of valuables at Joe's Totally Trustworthy Free Storage. You may trust your lockbox enough as an additional layer of security at your home, but do you really want to leave it in someone else's unmonitored possession?

      I'll never understand why people are so blindly trusting of people they've never met and treat even the slightest bit of skepticism as paranoia. There's a world of difference between not being a gullible chump and hunkering down in a boobytrapped bomb shelter.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    11. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by unrtst · · Score: 1

      Relying entirely on the security of someone else's encryption (especially if you don't have the understanding and ability to verify it) is very naive.

      What is the alternative, assuming you don't have the understanding and ability to verify it? Are you making your own? Good luck.

      Putting sensitive stuff on Dropbox is like storing your lockbox full of valuables at Joe's Totally Trustworthy Free Storage.

      BS. "sensitive stuff" here is an encrypted blob. It does not live solely on Dropbox servers. A physical lockbox (your analogy, not mine) would be a single physical item. Leaving said item at some shady place means that, at the very least, they could destroy it. Physical locks are also much easier to bypass if you don't care about destroying the box, as opposed to brute forcing a well designed encryption scheme.

      I'll never understand why people are so blindly trusting of people they've never met and treat even the slightest bit of skepticism as paranoia.

      If you re-read my post, you'll see that i don't use those services.

      You asked (in the post I replied to), "What if he doesn't trust the implementation of the encryption in the password manager?"
      There's a long list of options that anyone should be able to easily discern if they are at the point they don't trust a particular implementation, and that was my point. What was wrong with all of the other options I supplied (which should have been obvious next steps)?

      And the original post asked what we use. What do you use?

    12. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by chihowa · · Score: 1

      My point was that putting your password database "in the cloud" is a bad idea. Nothing more than that.

      There's no way for a normal person to determine if an encryption implementation is any good or not, so the only way to keep your passwords reasonably private is to not put them in that leaky sieve of online storage. Any random employee, hacker, or government could have access to your files there and you wouldn't know it. Hell, a Dropbox admin could have a script that just scans their entire storage for known-weak password database files and you wouldn't hear about it until the breach surfaced. Treating any cloud services as remotely private is insane.

      People put "password protected" zip files and Word documents and PDFs and such on Dropbox not knowing that the protection is junk, and most people here would scoff at the idea that they're safe.

      I use the built-in OS's keychains and password managers. They're "encrypted", but I wouldn't put them online. I transfer them between computers using a USB drive when I need to. It's not that big of a pain and I'm not paranoid enough to think that people are actively trying to break into my specific computer to steal my passwords.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    13. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by luxifr · · Score: 1

      My point was that putting your password database "in the cloud" is a bad idea. Nothing more than that.

      Actually it's a brilliant idea, as long as the encryption is strong enough.

      There's no way for a normal person to determine if an encryption implementation is any good or not, so the only way to keep your passwords reasonably private is to not put them in that leaky sieve of online storage.

      A "normal" person uses '12345 ', 'password' and the name of her dog as passwords. A "normal" person doesn't know and doesn't care about the implications of any of that. However, if you do use "good" passwords, chances are that you're also able to educate yourself enough about encryption to make - at least - an educated guess about the strength of an encryption scheme.

      Any random employee, hacker, or government could have access to your files there and you wouldn't know it. Hell, a Dropbox admin could have a script that just scans their entire storage for known-weak password database files and you wouldn't hear about it until the breach surfaced.

      In most companies not "any random employee" can access all data. Not even all company data, let alone customer data. But let's assume the malicious Dropbox admin scans their entire storage for known-weak password databases...
      1. how does he know them? by research... something you could do as well before using something 2. how does he identify them? by file extension? by file header? 3. how does he collect the MASSIVE amount of results (we're probably talking tens of terabytes at least)? On an external hard drive or something the like? would there be anything more suspicious for him to do? 4. what does he do with the data then? sell it? no, he has to break it open first... which isn't free either 5. why would he want YOUR data? is it really THAT interesting? and if you've access to valuable bussiness data, so does your manager who probably doesn't care or know as much about password security and is therefor the weaker link and a better target for an attack also: if the government wants your data, especially if you live in the common-wealth, then you're screwed anyway... you won't outsmart the nsa unfortunately

      Treating any cloud services as remotely private is insane.

      Seing threads everywhere and thinking that ones own data is so damn special to anybody that it would be worth the effort of breaking a strong encryption is even more insane

      People put "password protected" zip files and Word documents and PDFs and such on Dropbox not knowing that the protection is junk, and most people here would scoff at the idea that they're safe.

      I use the built-in OS's keychains and password managers. They're "encrypted", but I wouldn't put them online. I transfer them between computers using a USB drive when I need to. It's not that big of a pain and I'm not paranoid enough to think that people are actively trying to break into my specific computer to steal my passwords.

      That is as safe as putting "password protected" zip files online, really... if someone want's YOUR specific passwords, it should be easy enough to get someone steal your computer... easier than breaking into servers of big cloud providers... and the encryption on your computer would probably be easier to crack than the encryption of the data in the lastpass cloud for example having something physically near you doesn't make it safer... quite the opposite is the case that said: I go with lastpass... it's as secure as it gets right now... apart from actually memorizing all your passwords... I'd be more paranoid about laced shoes... loose laces pose REAL danger, you know... also it's more likely to get robbed on the streets or run over by a car than someone stealing your passwords from the lastpass servers... however: you can be as paranoid as you want but I hope you use an adblocker or your "my passwords are only stored in the OS's password manager" strategy (or any other strategy apart from having an allways-offline device where you put and read passwords manually) is pretty much useless anyway...

    14. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by chihowa · · Score: 1

      However, if you do use "good" passwords, chances are that you're also able to educate yourself enough about encryption to make - at least - an educated guess about the strength of an encryption scheme.

      You're not getting it. Even Bruce Schneier says encryption is hard to get right. While the encryption scheme may be fine, the actual implementation may be utter crap (or subtly flawed). Trusting the encryption as your only line of defense is unwise.

      In most companies...

      This entire paragraph is just filled with speculation. You don't know the internal business practices of the cloud services any better than I do. Why would you assume that they care about security and separation of access privileges?

      1. 2. 3. 4.

      If you can't imagine solutions to simple problems like this, how do you feel qualified to judge the quality of encryption software?

      As to 5, none of this relates to someone who wants to steal your passwords (as I specifically said in the post you responded to). This is more about mass harvesting of data in the cloud as is commonly done with credit cards, etc. Can you really not see the value in having access to hundreds or thousands of bank accounts?

      If you think not blindly trusting random people at companies is paranoid then there's nothing I can say to convince you otherwise.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    15. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by luxifr · · Score: 1

      However, if you do use "good" passwords, chances are that you're also able to educate yourself enough about encryption to make - at least - an educated guess about the strength of an encryption scheme.

      You're not getting it. Even Bruce Schneier says encryption is hard to get right. While the encryption scheme may be fine, the actual implementation may be utter crap (or subtly flawed). Trusting the encryption as your only line of defense is unwise.

      Appeal to authority much, eh? It's right that you have to trust the implementation. But then again, you have to (and do) trust many implementations in real life every day. Stuff that could actually KILL you if the implementation was "utter crap (or subtly flawed)". For starters: Think everything you eat, drink and use for transportation. That's why I was talking about making an educated guess.

      In most companies...

      This entire paragraph is just filled with speculation. You don't know the internal business practices of the cloud services any better than I do. Why would you assume that they care about security and separation of access privileges?

      I would assume that because a company wants to earn money and especially in cloud service providers there is so much competition that they couldn't afford to screw up even once. The least thing they can do to avoid that is to avoid being grossly negligent about security. Especially when their main selling point is the prospect of security.

      1. 2. 3. 4.

      If you can't imagine solutions to simple problems like this, how do you feel qualified to judge the quality of encryption software?

      As to 5, none of this relates to someone who wants to steal your passwords (as I specifically said in the post you responded to). This is more about mass harvesting of data in the cloud as is commonly done with credit cards, etc. Can you really not see the value in having access to hundreds or thousands of bank accounts?

      If you think not blindly trusting random people at companies is paranoid then there's nothing I can say to convince you otherwise.

      1. was a rethoric question and answered right away. 2. isn't as obvious as you make it sound... a proper true crypt container isn't easily distinguishable (if at all) from a massive file of just random data 3. and 4. are concerning the "Any random employee, hacker" figure... also: I don't store my bank account credentials anywhere...

      besides: it's easier to get access to hundreds or thousands of bank accounts by fishing than by stealing and breaking massive amounts of encrypted data... I didn't say not blindly trusting random people at companies is paranoid, did I? Interesting rethorics on your side...

      My main point still stands however: things like lastpass are fine for password storage, sync and transfer if used right because for most attacks on private data and credentials there are more efficient vectors: general, mass scale: fishing and malware via ads work just fine... targeted: well, let's not elaborate in detail about this, but in case of a targeted attack, it's probably any physical, offline vector you could think of...

    16. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Once again, your entire post is speculation and unsubstantiated assertions. My "appeal to authority" was to show you that my perspective has more sources than just my rear. Your position appears to be that there is no added risk to storing sensitive things online (that's the opposite of what I'm stating, and you keep arguing with me) or that the idea of mitigating known risks is nonsense. You're going to have to back that up with something more substantial than breathy rants full of ellipses that ramble on until concluding that your position is correct.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    17. Re:"Obviously" not Last Pass or 1Password by luxifr · · Score: 1

      Once again, your entire post is speculation and unsubstantiated assertions. My "appeal to authority" was to show you that my perspective has more sources than just my rear. Your position appears to be that there is no added risk to storing sensitive things online (that's the opposite of what I'm stating, and you keep arguing with me) or that the idea of mitigating known risks is nonsense. You're going to have to back that up with something more substantial than breathy rants full of ellipses that ramble on until concluding that your position is correct.

      Your appeal to authority just shows that you can come up with a citation and that your perspective lacks thinking of your own. You also continue to claim my position was rather extreme, when it's clearly not. I don't say that there's no added risk to storing sensitive things online. I'm just saying that the added risk is rather small if you're "doing it right"(tm) and that your point in ultimate mitigration of known risks (ie. no weighting between risk and use but just "don't do it") is an absolutely nonsense concept in its own because it doesn't work anywhere in real life. You're talking and seeing absolute extremes. I'm not. You obviously don't get that.

  12. Re:write them on a piece of paper by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

    I too am thinking of how to carry my passwords with me. My memory isn't as great. At home I have 1password running in the browser and in the menu bar at the top of the screen. But when I'm away from home i'm often lost. Before I was using the same password everywhere but am trying to move away from that because it is bad habit.

    I have 1 password installed on my phone, so presumably when I want to enter a pwd on a website I could take out my phone, open the app, look up the pwd, and manually type it in. But I'm looking for a really automated way. for example, having a pwd manager installed on a small USB thing on my keychain, then plugging it in and having all my pwds.

    any advice on how i could do this? the best solution is super clean and transparent, one step away from having the plugin installed in the browser. I was literally just looking the internet for it.

    thanks.

  13. Encrypted Databases by kroby · · Score: 2

    I keep a KeePass database for each of my consulting clients and encrypt them with a unique master password for each client that gets shared with the client. Then, another KeePass database with all of the client's master passwords inside of it encrypted with yet another master password that gets shared with my fellow consultants. This lets me give my clients access to their password documentation without having to give them the master password for all of my clients' databases. It also ensures that my colleagues have access to my client's passwords should they need to cover for me. Or, if you want to spend some money on a commercial product, look at Secret Server.

  14. Re:remember or reset by Anrego · · Score: 1

    The problem already exists (reset mechanisms are a huge hole in most systems), using it shouldn't make it any more vulnerable to attack.

  15. KeePass by ZenMatrix · · Score: 2

    I like KeePass it uses a database file that you can copy manually and you don't need to sync, or you could place the file on a dropbox share and use it from there. The file is encrypted and you need to enter a Master password each time. If you ever needed to give someone passwords you can export just the ones you need to share and set a new password so they can use it. Its been my favorite one to use since I use crazy complex passwords for everything online.

  16. http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/ by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2

    PasswordSafe works for me.
    Several passwords I need commonly, are written in my wallet, with nothing to indicate what, or what usernname, or system they are for. There are about 5 passwords written on a sticky note stuck to the back of a seldom used credit card.
    Everything else is in PasswordSafe.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    1. Re:http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/ by Melkman · · Score: 1

      Also worth mentioning is that the PasswordSafe database format has many different clients many of which are open source so you can check how your passwords are protected. Examples are Password Gorilla for Linux, MacOS and Windows and PwSafe for iOS .

    2. Re:http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/ by godrik · · Score: 1

      I use a few password for common systems I log in. For all the rest I use pwsafe to generate random passwords. I keep the password file on a git repository cloned on all my machines so it is difficult to lose that file.

    3. Re:http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/ by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      You are correct. In fact the cross platform clients are what first brought me to PasswordSafe.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    4. Re:http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/ by Gud · · Score: 1

      I use it a well and use Dropbox (looking for something safer to replace it) to keep my database synced among a bunch of machines
      PasswordSafe has the best password generators you can specify exactly what are the rules you want for each site

    5. Re:http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/ by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Ditto.

      PasswordSafe leaves me two passwords to remember, one to get into PasswordSafe, one to unlock the encryption on my laptop harddrive.

      I keep a copy of PasswordSafe & its database on a flashdrive, so I can take it with me pretty much anywhere.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  17. Web aoo by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    I created a web app. The password (decyption key) is sent on every request, so it's never at rest. Under the hood, entries are encrypted and decrypted with openssl using a reasonably secure algorithm. Each entry in the database is just a plain text file. I can include passwords, accounting information, URLs, whatever I want.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  18. Harder with age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I find that hard to believe. There's a website called Fark.com full of middle-aged people swearing up and down on a stack of bibles that being old is the best thing ever.

  19. Establish a secure area at the office by daveywest · · Score: 1

    1. Access should only be available to systems you currently and actively manage. If you're using the system so infrequently that you can forget, your account should suspended. 2. Admins should keep a secure log of access credentials stored in a secure area with controlled access. Any "in case of my death" information should be recorded. If there isn't a local site, you might want to consider storing the documents in a safe deposit box at your bank.

  20. Custom algorithm by Jumunquo · · Score: 1

    Come up with an algorithm only you know, that is generally different for each system you use, and for added security contains some personal thoughts about the site that make it hard to figure out your algorithm (although that last one might stump yourself too, lol). The problem is when you're forced to change your password, but it's usually some regular cycle, so I'm sure you could figure something out for that too.

  21. passwords management Allen Ludden style by turkeydance · · Score: 2

    randomly. three options. 1. slashdot starts with s: password is sw23edcx. 2. two s words: semaphoreslinky. 3. for those that require combos: Sw@3edcx.

  22. Re:Passport belt by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A failing memory means that you are not suitable for the job and should find something else, like working in a retirement home.

    Yeah, how many passwords like: R;3m|/|iv%{^B$
    do you have memorized? I have several passwords on that scale of arbitrary, that I did not pick, that I cannot change, that are changed on someone else's schedule, cannot be re-used, and that I tend to need to actually enter maybe once a quarter, if that.

  23. Use an Algorithm by clifwlkr · · Score: 1

    I gave up on password managers a long time ago. They are prone to compromise at some point. Instead, I use an algorithm that uses some element of the target as a seed to a simple formula. This gives me one thing to remember only ( or a few ), yet gives me a different password for every single site. A simple to understand, yet bad forumula to use, would be something like this: password = siteurl[2] + mySecret + siteurl[4]; So password for google would be 'omySecretl' Use a better formula for increased protection. Again, easy to remember,no password manager to get to/install, and a different password for every site, Likes it simple, Jim

    1. Re:Use an Algorithm by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      or just use pwdhash https://www.pwdhash.com/. There is firefox and Chrome addons

    2. Re:Use an Algorithm by clifwlkr · · Score: 1

      I like to use something that is in my head and I always have with me. That way it works when I scp, ssh, or whatever. Many times, I am not on a browser or necessarily even connected to the net. But I've been around a bit too so I am probably not typical that way..... Never mind embedded devices.

  24. Insecure but secure enough to keep most people out by JDeane · · Score: 1

    What I use is a text file on a thumb drive also backed up on several local drives.

    The text file contains the first half or so of the password, enough to remind me of what the password is should I forget. The rest is stored in my brain.

    For rarely used passwords and places I will put a hint under the half pass.

    I am trying to get away from these long 20 character passwords though... I really wish some one would invent a better system. Maybe a thumb drive that combines storage and a thumb print scanner in one package.

  25. Answer too long to fit in subject line by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 2

    A text file, encrypted locally with a long password (something I can remember easily, but quite long) and then uploaded to Google Docs for easy access anywhere that I have the decryption software. If I need a password, I just open that file up and copy / paste the password needed - then close it again. If I make a change to a password I can just change it once and that populates to all the other locations where my Google Docs are stored, but it is fully and safely encrypted the whole time.

    I even have an app for my phone in case I need it, but there is three factor authentication: my phone's login, a short PIN for the app, and then my full encryption password.

    --
    William George
    1. Re:Answer too long to fit in subject line by sylvandb · · Score: 2

      A text file, encrypted locally with a long password (something I can remember easily, but quite long) and then uploaded to Google Docs for easy access anywhere that I have the decryption software

      This. However s/password/passphrase/ and I don't use google docs but similar propagation.

      My text file also contains credit card account and phone numbers in case I need to cancel a card, routing and account numbers for if I need to set up direct deposit or other EFT, my kids social security numbers, and other similarly confidential reference information. I've even at times (not currently) kept a regularly needed signing cert in the file as my backup.

      I've tried many of the desktop password apps. But I've been doing my text file for about 20 years and nothing else is nearly as useful -- flexible and with ubiquitous availability.

      I recommend also to print a copy every now and then, with a date, sealing it up in an envelope or two, and keeping it with important "should I die or be incapacitated" papers (such as your will), replacing and shredding the older version.

      Write the date also on the envelope. The dates are so it is easy to tell which is the most recent in case multiple copies are found (e.g. a copy with your lawyer and a copy in the fireproof safe in the basement that is updated more frequently). The envelope(s) are to tell if someone has compromised the passwords so seal it up however makes you comfortable depending on who has access and how often you check (and update).

    2. Re:Answer too long to fit in subject line by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      A text file, encrypted locally with a long password (something I can remember easily, but quite long) and then uploaded to Google Docs for easy access anywhere that I have the decryption software. If I need a password, I just open that file up and copy / paste the password needed - then close it again. If I make a change to a password I can just change it once and that populates to all the other locations where my Google Docs are stored, but it is fully and safely encrypted the whole time.

      I even have an app for my phone in case I need it, but there is three factor authentication: my phone's login, a short PIN for the app, and then my full encryption password.

      Just FYI, KeePass does basically the same thing for you, but in a user-friendly, searchable, generally-less-mucking-around-required database. Pop the encrypted database file into Google Docs or Dropbox or somewhere and boom, you're done.

      I suppose one benefit of using a text file would be that you could theoretically use it on some new system that didn't have a KeePass client yet...if your encryption/decryption client worked on the new system, that is.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    3. Re:Answer too long to fit in subject line by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 1

      Fair enough - I was thinking about whether that was the right way to describe it as I wrote. Thank you for clarifying :)

      --
      William George
    4. Re:Answer too long to fit in subject line by WilliamGeorge · · Score: 1

      Although, at times I have used facial recognition on my phone - so that could be the 'something you are'... though it falls back to a password or PIN if the recognition doesn't work, so I guess that is a moot point.

      --
      William George
  26. Vim by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

    I use vim -x passwordfile.txt. It uses Blowfish encryption. You only need the -x flag when you create the file. I keep it on one computer at home, only, with a hardcopy (lots of index cards) in a desk drawer. If I need it on the road I temporarily copy required passwords on a USB thumb, encrypted. It's not an enterprise solution, but I'm just one person, so it works OK. Actually, I refer to the index cards way more often than the password file.

  27. Use a scheme by Tor · · Score: 1

    The problem with any password manager/tool (of course aside from a simple text file, which is obviously out of the question) is that you are dependent on that piece of technology. A commercial password manager may exist for Desktop OS 1 today, but may not be supported in Mobile Phone OS 2 tomorrow. The cumulative turnaround time for your password inventory is often much longer than that of any particular device in your possession.

    I've resorted to a lower tech solution for my own password inventory: A scheme that is based on the particular website (or other service name) in question. For instance, you may have an invariable prefix or suffix (perhaps an "encoded" phrase that's meaningful to you), a special character or two, and a component that is based on the web site or other name in question. In other words, something like:

                FiXeD#pArT.service-specific-part

    How you would "encrypt" that service specific component is really up to you - the point is that everyone would do so differently. But it should be something that you could train yourself to do relatively quickly.

    The only downside with this approach is that with so many different services with so many different password rules (some require a minimum number of characters but no more than a maximum, some REQUIRE uppercase or special characters; others do not support special characters at all.... etc), it's hard to find a single universal scheme that works everywhere. However I've found that with a couple of different schemes of this nature, I've gotten by so far.

    Another thing to think about is almost the opposite - how to enable access for your loved ones to certain places (e.g. to inventory your financial records etc) in the event of your death. Of course most of this can and should be done with signed affidavits etc, however, it can be difficult for them to get a complete view of all your accounts, policies, services etc unless you have a comprehensive summary somewhere.

    1. Re:Use a scheme by pspahn · · Score: 1

      I can't even remember what service it was (this was mid 90's) but I once got an auto-generated password string from a site I registered on (might have been my online banking).

      I ended up using that short string as a base password for everything and have continued to do so even today. I did this by doing the same thing you suggest, taking a small chunk and devising your own system for encrypting it while leaving it easy to recall.

      Yes, there are certain site with overly simplistic password rules. For those I simply use a generic password that I would use on other sites as well. Obviously, those are what I consider "throwaway" logins and I am not concerned at all about someone finding the password as that site/service has no long-term value to me.

      The sites/services that really mean something (web hosting panels, email, SSH stuff, etc) will always work with my scheme because they will always have robust password rules. If they don't, I choose another provider. This allows me to always know a password for something even though I may have not used the service in many months. Something like &Google-!@#$(mystring)$#@! or &Facebook-!@#$(mystring)$#@! is a simple enough way to do it, but you could certainly get more inventive if you like.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  28. I'd love to tell you, but... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that would be a security risk.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:I'd love to tell you, but... by CCarrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...that would be a security risk.

      Security through obscurity? Has this site taught you nothing?!? :)

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    2. Re:I'd love to tell you, but... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Security through obscurity?

      Security plus obscurity.

      Has this site taught you nothing?!? :)

      It's taught me that the bar for +5 Funny is pre-tty low.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  29. Lots of options! by hackajar1 · · Score: 1

    http://www.quest.com/privilege... http://www.liebsoft.com/ http://www.thycotic.com/produc... All of these support multi-user / groups of users access. That is what you actually want. And yes, they cost money, but if you are in IT and need password management, and don't want to pay any money, find a better employer!

    1. Re:Lots of options! by Monoman · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I like to check out this market niche from time to time. My main concern with some of these types of products is their complexity. When things go bad, very bad, I don't want to have to getting a multi-tier app by having to troubleshoot a remote DB, web server, etc just to retrieve a rarely used password. I have yet to find an app as simple as keypass, etc. that is multi-user but I will keep looking.

      For now we use one of the mentioned free single user products with multiple password files. There is a master file that will get you the password for all of the other files that are organized per dept/group.

      --
      Keep the Classic Slashdot.
  30. SuperGenPass by Chelloveck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For the most part I don't save or memorize passwords. I regenerate them as needed with SuperGenPass. SuperGenPass algorithmically generates passwords by hashing the site's domain name together with a single memorized password. This always generates the same password for any given site. So, I don't have to remember them or store them anywhere, I just need to know how they're generated.

    But what if I'm at someone else's computer without SGP installed? The SGP website has a "mobile" version, which is just javascript that runs entirely within the browser. Go there, type in the domain and password, and generate it. (Yes, I've checked the javascript. It's not sending your password out to the mothership or saving anything locally.)

    I do keep a notebook in a plaintext file with all the sites I use. This contains the domain name that the site had when I first signed up. Domain names sometimes change, or are ambiguous (ie., the same site is available via both foobar.org and foobar.com). The text file lets me keep track of what I need in order to regenerate the password.

    What about sites that require periodic password changes? I use the domain and just suffix my memorized password with a sequence number. And I write the sequence number in my notebook.

    What's that? Security questions? I generate the answer by hashing the question itself rather than the domain with my memorized password. And of course, I copy the question verbatim into my text file so I can regenerate the answer when I need to.

    The only failing is when I hit a site that doesn't allow certain punctuation, or has length limits, or something of that nature. Then I modify the parameters that I give to SGP and write down the specific parameters that I used.

    The notebook is stored on my home fileserver in an svn repository which gets backed up every night. I'm completely screwed if I ever forget my one secret, but it's one I've been using for literally decades now. It's going to be one of the last things to go when my brain develops bit rot.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    1. Re:SuperGenPass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I too use SuperGenPass and it's absolutely great, but I recently discovered that it has some well-known weaknesses: http://akibjorklund.com/2009/supergenpass-is-not-that-secure

      An alternative is PwdHash, but I haven't motivated myself to switch yet.

    2. Re:SuperGenPass by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      This much is true. That's why I normally use a locally-stored script, either Javascript in the form of a bookmarklet or a Python implementation of the algorithm.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    3. Re:SuperGenPass by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      Thanks for mentioning that. I'd heard of that vulnerability before. I actually have a Python implementation of the algorithm which I normally use from the command line rather than in the browser. That pretty effectively nullifies spying on the DOM. :-)

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    4. Re:SuperGenPass by lhunath · · Score: 1

      The idea is great, the implementation horrible.

      Master Password is an implementation of the same idea which takes care of all the flaws.

      In my opinion, what you need from a password manager is:

        - The output passwords need to be strong against attacks and the solution needs to be strong against attacks.
        - You need to be able to trust the algorithm and the implementation that implements it, and any involved parties.
        - Being safe from loss is just as important. If you can get locked out of everything the day your apartment catches fire, it sucks.
        - It needs to be sufficiently easy to use so that I won't get lazy and skip it.

      Doing 10 MD5's (SuperGenPass) offers NO strength against attacks on the solution at all. In fact, if I want all your passwords, all I need to do is make a website, get you to sign up with me, and brute-force your master password from the site password you gave me. A day's work, at most.

      Master Password implements several techniques to solve all of the above security problems: http://masterpasswordapp.com/s...

      --
      ``OK, so ten out of ten for style, but minus several million for good thinking, yeah?''
  31. Safely by AidenWright · · Score: 2

    Memorized the passwords. Know your limit on how many random letters, numbers, symbols you can memorize and then remember them. This is especially useful because my data dies with me.

  32. Re:Hash functions. by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    So you keep all your passwords in .bash_history? If by any chance the way you generated it for one site spills (from watching over your shoulder to putting a keylogger or whatever), all the others could fall.

    Btw, just adding a space at the start of the line will make bash to not save it in history.

  33. Password protected spreadsheet by Sesostris+III · · Score: 1

    OK, why not?

    (Truly curious as to why a password manager is considered better than an encrypted spreadsheet, using the same password or pass phrase).

    --
    You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
    1. Re:Password protected spreadsheet by Sesostris+III · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I don't think #a is particularly problematic these days - the modern versions of LibreOffice (and OpenOffice?) use AES-256. Good points with #b.

      --
      You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
    2. Re:Password protected spreadsheet by Sesostris+III · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Yes, there is the possibility of bypassing the clipboard (assuming some integration). Where there isn't, KeePass (for instance) clears the clipboard after a specified period (default12 seconds).

      --
      You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
  34. I hide it plain sight. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2

    These cyber criminals are babes in the woods, compared to my brilliance. I pull wool over their eyes easily. See? I enter the password in the username textbox and the username in the password textbox when I created the account. That is the last place they will look while trying to hack my password. haa haaa. The jokes on you script kiddies...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  35. KeePass by CreatureComfort · · Score: 4, Interesting

    KeePass. With the encrypted datafile in dropbox.

    --
    "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
    Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  36. TrueCrypt and a Safe by beerdragoon · · Score: 2

    I keep all my work passwords in a file that is saved in a TrueCrypt volume. This volume is kept on a network share where only domain admins can access it. I also keep some of the important passwords on a piece of paper that is locked in a safe in the data center. Generally I remember all the passwords I need, but sometimes (especially after a vacation) I need to refer to the TrueCrypt volume. If I ever forgot the password to access the volume, I have it stored in the safe. If I forget the combination to the safe...I'm screwed. Thankfully that hasn't happened yet.

    1. Re:TrueCrypt and a Safe by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      Store the combination to the safe in a file in your TrueCrypt volume, and Voila! Problem solved.

  37. SplashID by vanyel · · Score: 1

    I use SplashID on my phone (and it's probably the single biggest usage of my phone). Don't get the current version though - 7 is pretty much unusable. I had to fall back to 6, which is usable, though not quite as simple as 4 was (I think that's what I upgraded to 7 from, which was a terrible mistake). Like the submitter, I refuse to use the cloud offerings (which SpashID has as an option now). A cell phone is a risk, but I choose to believe that I could change the passwords before the database could be cracked, and that my risk from malware is low because I don't install every shiny new app that comes along. I do so mostly because there really isn't a practical alternative at the moment.

  38. Re:write them on a piece of paper by joe_frisch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I also have them written on a piece of paper, but it wouldn't do you much good if you stole it. if you see "god#" what would you type? It reminds me of what password I actually used (which doesn't contain English words).

    Now if someone REALLY wanted access to my accounts they could probably use that hint to reduce their search. If they had cracked some accounts, they could probably figure out some of the schemes I use as reminders and quickly figure out the rest.

    Of course they could also just hack my home wireless, or put me in a van and drill holes in my kneecaps until I told them.

  39. My method by asmkm22 · · Score: 1

    Break your password up into two parts: the root and the suffix. The root part of the password is the complex part, that you want to change periodically yet is the same for all of your services. The suffix part is simple to remember and unique to each service, and should be consistently derived from the service itself.

    For example, lets say you are setting up a password for your Yahoo account. The root part is "TLi945!zx" and the suffix would be "yahoo" resulting in a password of "TLi945!zxyahoo".

    Your password for Outlook might be "TLi945!zxoutlook". And so on. Each password is strong enough to hold up to pretty much any brute force attack, and when it comes time to changing your passwords, all you have to worry about memorizing is the root part. Then you just think about what service you are logging into and append it. Since the root part of your password gets used very frequently across all of your accounts, you can make it more complex than normal due to muscle memory building up faster.

    Also, it might be worth making the suffix a little less obvious than the name of the service. You could instead do something like the first, second, and last letter of the name, so the Yahoo password would look like "TLi945zxyao" and the Outlook password would look like "TLi945zxouk".

  40. Re:write them on a piece of paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    To late, I stole your wallet this morning and already logged into your bank and drained your accounts.

    Well, you have my driver's license, credit cards, and bank card, you already stole my identity, maxed out my cards, drained my bank account, and stole all my cash, what are passwords gonna get you that those other things haven't?

  41. All my passwords by dfsmith · · Score: 1

    are the same as my luggage.

  42. Re:remember or reset by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    The reset mechanisms exist regardless of how complex I make my passwords. They're generally not my systems.

  43. Re:Passport belt by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Systems that generate passwords like that - that you can't change - pretty much demand users write them down on a post-it note under their keyboard :(

  44. Old school by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    I memorize them. It's not always easy but it's really the only 100% secure way, and no they are not simple and they do get changed often.

  45. Re:write them on a piece of paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I also have them written on a piece of paper, but it wouldn't do you much good if you stole it.

    Same here. I use the names of common fruits and vegetables as my passwords. So if anyone steals my wallet, they will assume that my list of passwords is a grocery shopping list.

  46. ClipperZ by Llynix · · Score: 1

    I use a copy of the community edition of ClipperZ: https://clipperz.is/

    I run it securely on my own servers, although I've made a few modifications to prevent brute force logins and to brand it to my liking.

    I create separate accounts for all my clients and give them access to their account. They seem to love it as I have all their shit in one place for them if anyone else needs it.

  47. Don't use passwords by jchysk · · Score: 1

    Where ever you can get away without having to use passwords, I would not. Password-less solutions like LaunchKey can often easily be integrated into your systems and are MORE secure with less hassle.

  48. Modified Tablet by Rotworm · · Score: 1

    Linux can be installed on tablets. I would research a seven inch tablet, a distro that suits you, install Linux, encrypt the hard-drive, and power-down the device when not in use.

  49. Re:Security through obscurity by quonsar · · Score: 1

    You must use very short passwords.

  50. Captain Bad Password! by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty awful at password management.

    One "simple" password, used for web services that don't have any sort of financial or other "real" interaction with me beyond a pseudonym and a download I needed to access or an article behind registration that I needed to read.

    One "complex" password with a little bit of ever-changing entropy used for things like Google or Microsoft type services, banking/mortgage sites that don't offer me two-factor, etc. Your basic 7724hAppy!d0G$$smil3s sort of affair. Next year they'll all rotate slowly into 8562saD^DOG$$fr0wnz, if they're still in use, rendering abandoned site's passwords useless.

    And either two-factor authentication (RSA + "complex") or a unique "complex" password for accessing my work or accessing my uber-secrets.

    I frankly can't be bothered with much beyond that.

    1. Re:Captain Bad Password! by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      I fail at /b>

  51. Internet Password Minder by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1
  52. Passwords: Commit to Memory by SwimsWithTheFishes · · Score: 1

    I'm 60 and I have about 20 passwords. Some are to my wife's accounts.

    I memorize them. BUT they are all memorable to me.

    Let's say I had a very memorable event - my first kiss at an amusment park in 1969 - i'll create a password 'mfkaaapi69' and then switch it up a little bit so it ends up mFka&api6(

    This pasword might be resused for a few accounts, that I consider low level security (ie no money, no real identity). Banking/financial logins are unique and are longer mnemonics.

    Work is a pain - every 60 days we have to come up with a new one, so my work password is has a number I increment. KISS since they force the changing. Strangely some of my work logins still have the original password, while other logins are crazed about the changing. Must be different admins controling some of the domains and accounts.

    I do write my personal ones down, but that list is in our family papers stash, and it's clearly labeled what the accounts are - in case I kick the bucket.

    I've had a few scares and changed all passwords to all account at once. I had to rely on that written list for a few days.

    --
    *click**beep**beep* Scotty, One to Mod up!
  53. Re:Insecure but secure enough to keep most people by CCarrot · · Score: 2

    What I use is a text file on a thumb drive also backed up on several local drives.

    The text file contains the first half or so of the password, enough to remind me of what the password is should I forget. The rest is stored in my brain.

    For rarely used passwords and places I will put a hint under the half pass.

    I am trying to get away from these long 20 character passwords though... I really wish some one would invent a better system. Maybe a thumb drive that combines storage and a thumb print scanner in one package.

    Youy mean like this?

    Yeah, they're a bit pricey, but not totally out of the ballpark for the concerned user :)

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  54. TrueCrypt + DropBox by joelleo · · Score: 1

    I have a truecrypt virtual disk that I store in a dropbox folder. Because dropbox can sync differentially the entire thing doesn't have to sync every time I disconnect the file. Because all dropbox sees is the encrypted file, unless someone can decrypt it it is useless even if they breach my dropbox account or in some other way gain access to the file.

    It works a treat, to be honest. I keep sensitive passwords, of course, but also use it as encrypted storage for my notetaking app, sensitive diagrams, images etc.

    --
    "In the end, there is simply no weapon more devastating than the truth, delivered in just the right way." - tnk1
  55. I use SecureSafe - 2 factor authentication by elrick_the_brave · · Score: 1

    It is good for iOS, Android, or web. Passwords available offline or online. Documents online. Can enable two factor authentication - send SMS to phone.
    http://securesafe.com/
    Really good product and very happy with it.

    --
    (1st sig) If this were a snappy sig, you'd be reading it right now. (2nd sig) I'm a karma whore. >Insert FUD here
  56. Re:Hash functions. by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    unset HISTFILE

  57. password repository on a company phone by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    I have Secret! and KeePass on a company smart phone. Secret stores my personal passwords, and Keepass stores system passwords. Both are synced to/from a company server. The master password for Keepass is known to the other admins, and the Secret password is known only to me. (And no, it's not Correct Horse Battery Staple, sorry.)

    If the company has a problem with you keeping company passwords on a personal phone, have them issue you a phone with remote kill.

    The advantage of using a repository is that you're never tempted to make passwords easier to remember (IE: guess) or to reuse a password across multiple systems. The repository password is (ok I'll tell you...) a random string of characters arrived at by pounding the keyboard with both hands for several seconds and then choosing a sequence out of the center of the garbage. But you can remember any random string if you only have to do it once.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  58. Re:write them on a piece of paper by bobbied · · Score: 1

    To late, I stole your wallet this morning and already logged into your bank and drained your accounts.

    That's quite a trick, because before you can figure out the account name I used for the passwords you have, you are going to have to know the code.

    So, I have passwords on paper, but I'm going to guess you won't come up with the *real* password any time soon.

    Here, give it a try... My managed switch at home: "09"

    Let me know what the password is...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  59. We need more information, Albus.. by ThaumaTechnician · · Score: 1

    I'm at a loss to understand what the security issues you would have such that cloud-based password managers are a hazard. And yet, such that you can get away with passwords that you can commit to memory.

    Any password you can remember is a password that is already in thousands of crackers' try-these-first password lists. All of the online security breaches of password database have provided a rich and extensive database of passwords that people actually use. No, you need to use a password manager. Like five years ago. But a password-managing device is the worst possible option you can consider. How can you back up your password database?

    A good, completely off-line option is Steve Gibson's 'Off the Grid' password generator here: https://www.grc.com/offthegrid.... You could generate a paper grid and use that. It can be reprinted as needed, and even if you lose it, no problem.

    Some/all of the cloud-based managers can be used offline. I know for a fact that LastPass does not need to be connected to the 'Net to work. It's free, try it out - see if it works for you. There are 'LastPass Portable' versions, designed to run off a thumbdrive.

    For a buck a month, LastPass provides stellar technical support (one of the programmers called me at home to sort out an issue I was having when using 'LastPass for Applications' with the steaming pile of a crap that is iTunes): https://lastpass.com/go-premiu... Their security has been vetted by trusted reviewers, they use best practice encryption and protocols. Perhaps their Enterprise services will fit the bill?

    Cheap at twice the price. I can't recommend them enough.

  60. Re:Passport belt by bobbied · · Score: 2

    Systems that generate passwords like that - that you can't change - pretty much demand users write them down on a post-it note under their keyboard :(

    Yea. Stupid rules end up with stupid results, and having passwords that are too complex is nuts.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  61. Re:Passport belt by vux984 · · Score: 2

    I have 26 like that.

    So if I generate 26 more, you'll have no trouble memorize them all? Assuming that is the case, good for you, you are a special flower.

    To suggest that anyone else is unfit to work in any field requiring security is absurd.

    I also have a generic "Password123" password for sites that are use once and forget.

    I agree this is sensible.

  62. Re: Passport belt by bobbied · · Score: 1

    He definitely wasn't in charge of network security.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  63. Re:Passport belt by dnavid · · Score: 2

    To suggest that anyone else is unfit to work in any field requiring security is absurd.

    I think he was saying if you're in an environment where you both need to use very strong passwords *and* its not acceptable to write them down in something you carry securely all the time, *then* that suggests you either have to have a very good memory or you're not qualified to operate with those restrictions.

  64. Joking aside, a wristwatch by davecb · · Score: 1

    If one of the very-short-ranged devices like a wristwatch can be handed the task of keeping your temporary key, then go for it. A crook has to cut it or your hand off, or a court has to write a order to let the police at it. That's reasonabley secure, at least as good as a door-key on a keyring. The magic words are "short ranged".

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  65. You are overlooking something by UnderCoverPenguin · · Score: 1

    If you use a simple prefix you can remember, a different one for each system, then you can program a complex suffix into a YubiKey configured in "static mode". This avoids changing the existing password based system.

    Of course, it's not as secure as other options, like One Time Passwords or challenge-response systems, but is an improvement.

    (Another option would be to have a seperate YubiKey for each system, then each system could have a completely unique password.)

    --
    Don't try to out wierd me, three-eyes. I get stranger things than you, free with my breakfast cereal. --Zaphod Beeblebr
    1. Re:You are overlooking something by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      For low-security sites (99% of all web forums), using Firefox with a "master password" and then having Firefox remember the password is just fine. And you can run your FF profile in portable mode or something to synchronize between systems.

      All of my low-security, don't care if I can't get in them for a day or three, sites use a completely random 15-30 character alphanumeric password. Then I just have the browser remember it.

      As a backup to that, I keep all passwords in individual text files, with the contents protected by PGP/GPG. That has the advantage that I really only need to remember my (long) GPG passphrase in order to retrieve any password. Plus, since they are simple text files, I can store them in just about anything at all (such as git or SVN) to synchronize them across machines.

      My high-security site (financial) authentication details only exist in GPG-encrypted files. Those are decrypted in the GnuPG clipboard editor just long enough to enter into the password box.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  66. 100% secure option. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    I cant believe that nobody has mentioned what is used in a lot of high security areas...

    http://www.mandylionlabs.com/

    Get one of their fobs, works for all and will self destruct if you enter the master password in wrong.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:100% secure option. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      So long as that's not the only place or if it's for logins, which can be changed via physical access to a machine, instead of passwords to encrypted data which becomes inaccessible without it.
      IMHO very important data should never have the mode of failure of "we lost the password".

  67. Booby-trapped cave by quantaman · · Score: 1

    I etch them into stone plates then hide them deep in a cave in the Amazon surrounded by deadly booby-traps.

    It's pretty secure but it's a bit of a pain to access them when I forget the login for my hockey pool.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  68. I keep it simple by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

    I'm like the luddite here. I have a system of a handful of passwords I use. I have one unique that I use for gmail. I have a secure one that i use on a few sites. a secondary secure pass. I have an unimportant password that i use for junk things things like forums I don't care about. I has a few backup passwords I switch to when someone gets hacked like kickstarter.

    --
    Just another second banana
  69. Just remember this by Minwee · · Score: 1

    None of these methods of password storage are resistant to the twelve dollar wrench attack.

    1. Re:Just remember this by hambone142 · · Score: 1

      Or an Ubuntu OS on a disc.

  70. Re:password=password by thewolfkin · · Score: 1

    congratulations your password of "password=password" is rated "Fair" strength.

    --
    Just another second banana
  71. simple encrypted dmg file saved in dropbox by elliott666 · · Score: 1

    the way i do it is i create a small DMG file, turn on good encryption and save it in Dropbox. Put a simple text file in there. done. Just eject it when you're done and make sure to not store the password in your keychain. OS X only, but if you need in you can get into DMGs with 7-ZIp on Windows or just mount it under linux.

  72. Levels of security by AndyCanfield · · Score: 1

    I have levels of security. Any ordinary web site that demands a password gets my lowest-level password, which is the same on any such site. This happens to be my Slashdot password - who cares if somebody hacks that one?

    I have a special password that I use for my bank account. It could cost me all my money. Same password for any bank.

    Sometimes I have an intermediate level, but not often. It's surprising how little security is really necessary.

    Total of two or three passwords, each memorized.

    1. Re:Levels of security by dbIII · · Score: 1

      which is the same on any such site

      Same password for any bank

      That's what is called an enormous attack surface. If you treat the initial web password as if it is no security at all, then fine, but at the bank level it just takes one Target style bit of stupidity in one of those banks for someone to get access to multiple accounts, with only the problem of guessing your username to slow them down. with many banks that isn't much of a slowdown and if you've done transfers between the compromised account and the others then it's likely they don't have to guess.

      IMHO we should start teaching kids about this stuff in school. Important stuff should have unique passwords.

  73. ok, I'll bite by hurfy · · Score: 1

    notebooks

    Once I got past the post-it level many years ago I put them all in a notebook but not too obvious or near computer. Afterall, the daily ones are memorized.

    Actually 2 notebooks as I copied it all for a copy at home and work. The new passwords go on a page in the front and that gets copied to take and enter in the opposing book to keep them reasonably sync'd. If it is new enough that it is not in the other book I probably remember it still :)

  74. Flat File by jrumney · · Score: 1

    ~/passwords.txt.gpg contains all my important passwords, I have copies of it everywhere. For non-important passwords (like Slashdot logon), I just use a password I can remember, which is the same or minor variants based on the site's password limitations.

    1. Re:Flat File by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest splitting that up into multiple text files (one per site) and then putting it into git or SVN or some other version control system. Which will make it easier to sync between systems. It also makes it possible to use multiple or different keys for different accounts, depending on the protection level needed for that account.

      I do mine as regular text files with GPG armored ASCII inside, then use the GnuPG clipboard editor to decrypt the ASCII block as needed. The really important sites get printed and stored in a safe, along with a printed (but encrypted) copy of the private keys. There's also a USB-key in the safe with the key rings and files, but it may not survive a fire like the paper likely will.

      With ASCII-armored content, you could (worst-case) restore by OCR'ing or hand-keying off a printed page or fax page.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    2. Re:Flat File by jrumney · · Score: 1

      There's also a USB-key in the safe with the key rings and files, but it may not survive a fire like the paper likely will.

      It seems like there must be a flaw in your logic somewhere, but I can't quite spot what it is.

  75. Book in locked drawer or safe by dbIII · · Score: 1

    You never know what things can go wrong with electronic systems, but a book with written passwords in a place where the boss knows where to look if you get hit by a bus is almost foolproof.

  76. Re:Insecure but secure enough to keep most people by JDeane · · Score: 1

    Oh that is a nice thing!!!

    Thank you!!!

    Yeah a little pricey but not crazy expensive at all and totally worth it.

  77. Actually you can use it on Linux by geek · · Score: 1

    Sync 1Password to your drop box from your mobile/Windows/Mac and you can view it in Dropbox securely via a web browser.

  78. B-Folders by krelvin · · Score: 1

    Windows, Android pretty sure there is an iPhone version. keep it sync'd and use a complicated password. 3 shots at the password and the database is wiped. A website accounts are random generated different passwords for each site. No two sites has the same password. Most don't have the same user account. Also good for devices, and other info where you need to keep notes, date purchased, sn, license keys, setup info etc...

  79. Password Safe by Mryll · · Score: 1

    I have used Password Safe, Bruce Schneier's solution for a number of years. (pwsafe.org)

    Linux version is in beta with Windows and Android versions available

  80. My password.. by wakawakka · · Score: 1

    ...is just the letter "a"

  81. Ironkey by jjdacl · · Score: 1

    IronKey comes with a good password manager. I find it invaluable for remembering everything for me.

  82. Re:Passport belt by rjr3 · · Score: 2

    I love my wife and her name is lesa 53

    good luck with cracking the below
    Ilvemywfenderamesesa53
    GRC 2 X 10 ^ 39

    or

    my car is a 2004 vw jetta
    YaRSa004WettA
    GRC 2x10^23

    next car is a 2014 nissan leaf sv
    NexCaIA201NissaLeaS

    It really is not that hard.

  83. plain short scripts by rduke15 · · Score: 1

    plain text file in a Truecrypt volume, and little scripts to query/add to the file. It used to be batch scripts when I used Windows. Now I use bash in Linux, which should also work on Mac. The "t" script is to mount the Truecrypt volume if needed.

    $ cat `which p`
    #!/bin/bash
    [ -d /media/truecrypt1 ] || t on

    # accept up to 3 arguments, and filter on all 3
    if [ -z "$2" ]; then
            grep -ni "$1" /media/truecrypt1/p
    else
            grep -ni "$1" /media/truecrypt1/p | grep -i "$2" | grep -i "$3"
    fi

    $ cat `which padd`
    #!/bin/bash
    [ -d /media/truecrypt1 ] || t on
    echo `date +%F` " $@" >>/media/truecrypt1/p

    1. Re:plain short scripts by Xenolith0 · · Score: 1

      In your p script you can actually remove the entire if-statement and replace it with a single line. Doing this will also give you the benefit of allowing you to pass any number of arguments.

      Replace:

      if [ -z "$2" ]; then
                      grep -ni "$1" /media/truecrypt1/p
      else
                      grep -ni "$1" /media/truecrypt1/p | grep -i "$2" | grep -i "$3"
      fi

      With:

      grep -niE "$(echo ${@} | sed -r 's/ +/|/g')" /media/truecrypt1/p

    2. Re:plain short scripts by rduke15 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but that is actually not the same. Your single line does an "OR" with the searches. I use multiple greps to achieve "AND". ("search1.*search2" would not work either, failing to find them in a different order like in "...search2 ... search1").

    3. Re:plain short scripts by Xenolith0 · · Score: 1

      Hah, you're right. However, with a slight modification it will do an "and" instead of "or" and it still gives you the ability to do 0 or more search criteria instead of one or three:

      grep -niE "$(echo ${@} | sed -r 's/ +/.*/g')" /media/truecrypt1/p

  84. Keep it simple. by fgb · · Score: 1

    Just use the same password everywhere. "monkey" is always a good choice.

  85. In one word... by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    Alzheimers.

    Seriously this is a PITA today.
    For random ones I do not care about... .txt file slightly munged.
    For less random ones vim -x
    Serious ones -- if I told ya I might have to silence ya.

    At work I had an old school photo book with 4"x5" cards in a well locked drawer equivalent.
    I could hand a card to someone that needed it. Cross out the old and enter a new when the card comes back (think library checkout).
    where a card was a log of who got it.

    I could hand the book to my x-boss when I left ;-)
    after he signed for it :}

    "ssh" keys help a lot of things.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  86. Re:Password Safe by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

    Same here. The database is encrypted, so the risk is minimal even when it's on my phone. Any malware that could get at the database password as I type it could get at any password I type, and I'd frankly be more worried about malware circulating on the company network.

  87. Re:Passport belt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i think he was also saying "i am a fucking dick".

    haha, captcha: "elderly"

  88. Password store by julian4411 · · Score: 1

    Well, I keep a plasticized Password Card [1] for keeping the passwords that actually matter, along with a PGP passphrase, which is used to open up my password store [2]. The program itself is available on any major distribution, and its really easy to install if its not; it's also very easy to use. The only "disadvantage" is that there's no Windows version. [1] https://www.passwordcard.org/e... [2] http://www.zx2c4.com/projects/...

  89. Use a system by Tempestas · · Score: 1

    I do this... Service/Website Name+GeneralPassword spaced by $'s $Slashdot$Password$ This gives you a unique password for each site and I can remember it easily.

  90. single password + prefix by fongaboo · · Score: 1

    I picked one robust password, and then I add a prefix to the front that relates to the site or service it is for. For instance, for Google it would be go************, where ************ is the common portion.

  91. Similar here by Brad1138 · · Score: 1

    That is similar to what I have been doing for years, I have a base password, then I add characters generated for the domain name using my own algorithm. Easy to figure out in a few seconds and every PW is different.

    --
    If you could reason with religious people, there would be no religious people
  92. Use lastpass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can use LastPass offline. Maybe try looking into all of the options instead of making assumptions.

  93. Open Office, encrypted calc file by itwasgreektome · · Score: 1

    I store all my passwords in an openoffice calc file that's password protected. Additionally, that file is hidden on a truecrypt non discoverable drive. I feel relatively safe doing that.

  94. Make them memorable by wmorrow · · Score: 1

    I've started using a concatenation of many easy words, related to the system and my daydreams. According to xkcd, long plain word passwords are more secure. So at work, one password is "servertwomybitterlife". At home, it's "Anypornonthis24inchmonitor?" My bank account is "Ohlookabalancebelowzeroagain!"

  95. No mention of Roboform? by micronicos · · Score: 1

    I have been using Roboform for over 5 years. Currently I have 600 sites/passwords, all different, stored on my laptop & password-protected. The beauty of Roboform is that it will fill in passwords for Windows programs like SSH & SFTP & VNC as well as logging you in to sites automatically.

    Off my laptop I store Roboform2Go in a Truecrypt volume on a thumb drive.

    In the cloud I use SpiderOak to store the password-protected passwords.

    I'd like to know any reasons why this is not safe? It is most convenient & runs on my Linux box too.

    I do NOT use Roboform online sync, only locally.

    --
    Nico M, London, GB.
  96. Re: Passport belt by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    Well, come back when you find a network security guy who accomplished more then Einstein.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  97. Congratulations! by pigsycyberbully · · Score: 1

    My passwords are usually more than 16 characters and they are non-dictionary words. They are all types of characters some using non-Romanised letters. I literally could not! cannot remember my passwords for my server for my WordPress for my email system and various different formal and non-formal email accounts managed by me. My Amazon password my eBay password my blah blah blah password even for this website even though it's a smaller password. I keep all my passwords in a plain text file on a external hard drive. I make a policy of not telling people what type of desktop operating system, I use for security reasons my web browser has no identifiable user agent because I do not want to give a potential enemy information to attack my computer system through email and various brute force programs or Trojans and viruses Java exploits and drive-by malware. I run a very secure system and the only weakness I have is remembering those bloody passwords! I'm sick of the fucking things.. Get through my external hardware firewall and my internal software firewall and my intrusion detection and there is my passwords in plain text all in the centre of a pretend dummy boring read-me document. I need to encrypt them some day and yes with another fucking password I hate the bastards. I often use a language and browse websites that have a similar language to 1,338,299,512 people who all think they are master "Hackers." So there is probably 1,338,299,512 people with my passwords plus the NSA and GCHQ and somebody's granny at Tristan da Cunha.

  98. Personally and Professionally by xrayspx · · Score: 1

    Personally, I use a password protected secure not in an OSX keychain. Fine, rail me for that, but if someone gets into my keychain, I already lose anyway.

    For work, I've been trying WebPasswordSafe for the last several months. This is to get away from the melange of different un-sync'd password lists in various password managers people in the IT department had. So far it works well, it offers group policies, so theoretically it could be rolled out company wide and each user and group could have their separate password lists.

    I'd been guided to look at SecretServer, but the features I need are in WPS, and it's easier to sell Free in my company than Several Hundred or Thousand dollars, for many things at least.

  99. Make your own by LainTouko · · Score: 1

    I've just constructed my own simple password manager. Attach a short ident for each password to a strong master password, and then SHA512 and base64, truncate the result as necessary. Can be easily reconstructed wherever you want.

  100. KeePass by GeePee2000 · · Score: 1

    KeePass has served me well for four years now. Used in conjunction with dropbox. I've also got plugins for use with Chrome and TrueCrypt. As a personal solution it is fine. Not sure if it works as well for multiple users. Like the OP I've had problems with corporate password management. Software solutions seem to be either personal and cheap/free or large and eye wateringly expensive. I looked seriously at one about ten years back until I discovered that it was going to costs us approx. $20k

  101. Boom, minds blown. by danmart1 · · Score: 1

    Maybe I just old, but pencil and paper. Or, if you're really tech savvy, type it out on a typewriter. For those of us from the future, we can make a document, print it, and then not save it. Probably the most secure system ever created, assuming you don't leave it lying around.

  102. Just remember a few transforms by cjishnu · · Score: 1

    I memorize set of transforms on words that spits out different words. e.g. Transform1: always replace "apple" with "orange" Transform2: Replace the letter "e" with "eat" Then I write down all the passwords against each site and mark which transform I have used for each i.e. Transform1 or Transform2. Since only I know what each transform means, even if someone sees my list of passwords, they can't do anything about it. I don't have to refer to the table of passwords for all the commonly used passwords coz my fingers remember it somehow. So this is working out pretty well so far.

  103. Two approaches by Doghouse13 · · Score: 1

    Passwords at home, I write down and file (with the exception of hyper-important stuff like bank access, where I choose passwords significant to to me and just write down clear hints that will help me get them but no-one else). I reckon that, if anyone gets access to those, I have bigger problems to worry about.

    At work (softwear techie) I had, on average, 20-40 different password-protected access of various types. I (a) followed a theme meaningful to me (usually based on hobby things I'd been doing away from work); (b) used a single password on all systems; (c) guarded it carefully and changed it if I had the slightest suspicion it had been compromised; (d) changed it everywhere at the same time, regularly; (e) wrote down expired passwords so that I could recover any I accidentally failed to change; and (f) tried NEVR changed it immediately before going on leave. I found the combination of a password meaningful to me and the drill inherent in changing it multiple times in succession (and them using it regularly from that point on) meant that I never had a problem. Yes, I only had one password - one breach would have been a bigger exposure. But I NEVER had to write it down - and on the few occasions on which I had a brief memory glitch I could, in the worst case, give myself a big clue by looking back at my previous passwords to remind myself of my current "theme".

  104. I use common sense and a series of passwords. by JimB · · Score: 1

    I have 3 classes accounts. work accounts, important personal accounts, and junk accounts. I use an easy to remember 8 to 12 word phrase that describes the 'class' of account (Longer phrase where I deem more security is needed). I take one of the letters from each word in the phrase (all first letters, or 2nd, or 3rd, . . .), use "special character substitution" (like 3 for e, @ for a, etc.). This becomes the 'class password'. I then add a two character description for the specific account or computer I am using. I either wrap the 'class password' in these two leters, or stick them both at the front or end. I change the class passwords around every 6 months. Sometimes up to a year for "junk" acounts (FB, Twiter, et. al.) I have around 40 different accounts, in three 'classes', that I remember easily, and for long periods of time. Because I only have to remember very little. I never tell anyone any of my passwords, and never let them use my machines. And I don't obsess about the passwords. Physical access & "social engineering" are the easiest ways into a system, anyway.

  105. KeePass, but... by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 1

    Like many other posters here, I also use KeePass and put the password file on DropBox.

    The only issue for me is that I also use a "keyfile" file on all my computers (work, home, laptop), and that I could not yet find an iOS version of KeePass which would support keyfiles.

    Any idea ?

    1. Re:KeePass, but... by andras.tim · · Score: 1

      +1

  106. Encryption by inkrypted · · Score: 1

    I have so many I use a master password list written in a simple text document that is in two places. My main machine and a flash drive both protected by Truecrypt. The flash drive actually has a small binary on it so the computer I use it on does not have to have Truecrypt installed on it for me to use it. It supports Windows, Macintosh, and Linux. http://www.truecrypt.org/

    --
    Chris Sheppard
  107. Other question: how to remember a forgotten pass? by allo · · Score: 1

    I still have some big encrypted file here, were i forgot the password. I know i did change it to something secure once, and i have a bit of a clue, what the password was. But every variation i can think of did not work. So i still hope, i remember the password someday ...
    Is there any good trick to recall a password you once knew by heart?

  108. threat models by Tom · · Score: 1

    Preface: I am an IT security professional.

    I actually have a small set of passwords I use everywhere. Quite honestly, 90% of the forums, communities, blogs or whatever that I have an account on aren't worth having a different password for. If they get hacked, the password lost, you can post an irritating rant in my name - big deal.

    It's all about thinking about the actual risk instead of applying one formula to everything. Yes, my PayPal account has a different password, as does my e-mail or my server account password and my root password - all of those have their own individual passwords not used anywhere else.

    But for everything else, I have 3 or 4 passwords that I assign based on context and importance. All the online-games I play have the same password, for example. Go on, break into my LoL account. You can ruin my MMR until I find out, wow, I'm so afraid.

    So in sum total I have about 10 passwords, and I can keep them in memory. I have an encrypted textfile (network-shared) where they're stored, just in case I have an accident or something. Since that's just for backup purposes, I have no need for any of the password management tools.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:threat models by sl149q · · Score: 1

      Agreed. In fact those 90% of sites can simply be forgotten about. Enter something in, use it and forget it. If you ever go back just click on the forgot password option and then use the emailed link to set another forgettable password.

  109. Idea for PINs by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

    My dad has a bunch of cards for various tasks, including credit cards, fuel station cards, access cards for the various company locations he needs to access and so on. I think he has at least 15 different cards either on him or in his work vehicle at all times, and they all have unique PINs.

    So, being a guy who's worked with electronics for nearly 40 years, he puts the PINs right on the cards, in the format of resistor color codes. For instance, 1234 becomes "BRREORYE". Perfectly indecipherable to anyone who isn't into electronics, and still indecipherable to most electronics people if they don't know the secret.

    --
    Eat the rich.
  110. Careful with that spelling! by QilessQi · · Score: 1

    A few years ago I meant to try out KeePass but accidentally installed a totally different app called KeepAss.

    On the plus side, I still have my ass, so it must be working.

  111. SSH/GPG encrypted text file by blackjackshellac · · Score: 1

    I use a vim plugin that allows me to read a gpg encrypted file to get to my passwords, which lately are random 12 character strings of letters, numbers and symbols generated with pwgen. The system ssh account and the gpg keys should have different passwords. I avoid entering passwords remotely from secured systems using ssh keys (with ssh-add, or in more recent years this is handled by gnome). I do not want to put my trust in other password safes, especially those on smart phones. I do use firefox with a master password to store less sensitive passwords and feel relatively secure doing so but would never store anything like banking passwords there.

    --
    Salut,

    Jacques

  112. Re: write them on a piece of paper by techprophet · · Score: 1

    Nonsense! Clearly the god number is +5 Insightful!

  113. Password Safe by ltrand · · Score: 1

    Encrypts the file, has a portable exe for simple use, and wipes the password out of clipboard when the program is closed. You can set password complexity requirements on the random generation either for all passwords, a group of passwords, or a single password. Set password aging if you have to, and make notes on each password entry. I use it extensively and it is a great convenience.

  114. Dexadine's Acerose password vault by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    I've been using it for a very long time, it's a Windows stand alone program.
    http://www.dexadine.com/aceros...

    After installing a new OS, I'll pull a short-cut to the desktop. It's rather old I think it was XP that broke it (they claim Win7) - It used to call a site then automatically log-in, but I never used it when it worked, so no big deal.

    That Pitbull Wallet looks nice but I don't use passwords over my cell phone or tablet, just my PC; exceptions being gmail (not my main account) and Netflix. I don't because I don't have to.

  115. kiskis by higuita · · Score: 1

    I use kiskis, a program just like keepas, but older, in java and uses AES to encrypt the file.... choose a good password as master password and you are good to go!

    The java allow me to run in almost any system, have the program and the encrypted db in a pendrive (where i have some basic passwords) and i also have my main password db at home. For more important passwords, i ssh to home, do a quick gpg -d password.db.gpg | less and search for the password.

    This way i can access the passwords from whatever i am, i have the the passwords in a standard secure encryption and in a secure location (home and office) on different passwords db for different objectives

    --
    Higuita
  116. Re:Simple solution by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, my body is already full of tattoos about John G.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  117. Use a formula for low security passwords by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    I used to use a simple indexed array for remembering passwords but as the OP noted the number gets too large (thousands) so I switched over to a formula combined with an indexed array. Low security passwords get the least protection under this system and the high security passwords get stored in the array which is much harder to crack.

  118. cellphone camera by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

    I actually generate my passwords with a spreadsheet. It displays the new password in large type, then I take a picture of it with my cell and store it.

  119. Keepass by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    I use KeePass as well. I store the database in a Truecrypt volume which then is propagated across my OSes via one of the cloud backup services.

  120. I wrote them on a by NewYork · · Score: 1

    paper

  121. LastPass.com by jess_wundring · · Score: 2

    I've been using them for years, and I love it so much that I subscribe to their premium service, even though I don't have a use for it, to provide support for them...their basic service is free.

    It autofills my username and password on any machine where I have the app installed. If I don't have the app installed but need to get to my username/passwords, they have an online vault I can log on to.

    And searching is easy - I can search by username or site or keyword in description. They auto-filter my passwords as I type into the search box.

    https://lastpass.com/

  122. Re:Hash functions. by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    Not on my PC (Fedora 20):

    $ bash --version
    GNU bash, version 4.2.45(1)-release (i686-redhat-linux-gnu)

    And the test:

    1001  ls
    1002   ls
    1003  history

  123. Password Protected Excel by teknosapien · · Score: 1

    Being "old" I still remember all the passwords I need to. That being said I have a few co-workers that use a password protected Excel Sheet

    --
    no matter how good it is, it is human nature always wants to make things better
  124. Password manager by MJordan666 · · Score: 1

    I've been using Ascendo DataVault since my Blackberry days. I needed something that would cross platform with Blackberry & Windows and that was it at the time. They have since added IOS and Android to the mix. The database is resident only on your devices and can be synced between them. It may not be the best or the cheapest out there, but it works. I use it for logins, credit card account data, inventory and just about any small stuff that I don't want to leave out in the clear.

  125. Re:1Password + Dropbox sync by wavedeform · · Score: 1

    Would I trust the setup with nuclear launch codes? No.

    They were set to 00000000 for decades anyway, so why not?

  126. post it notes by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    like god intended

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  127. Nose4News by Nose4News · · Score: 1

    My long-term memory is stuffed with things I memorized out of necessity or boredom when I was a kid--my Aunt Marie's phone number, my high school locker combination, mnemonic devices that I made up, the punch line to a joke. So, I figure if I still remember them today, they will be around for a while longer and I assign them to sites as a password is needed. Then, I add the site to a list on my desktop with just the clue. The list is of no use to anyone but me.

  128. How? by nessman · · Score: 1

    I'm fucking smart. That's how.

  129. How common are password guesses/brute force anyhow by millertym · · Score: 1

    I don't even remember the last time I heard of a large scale data compromise from passwords being either brute forced or guessed. By a massive amount - bordering on 100% - compromises are from backdoors, social engineering, and zero day vulnerabilities that lengthy, encrypted, impossible to remember passwords don't help.

  130. I can recommend passwordstate by myxiplx · · Score: 1

    For internal passwords, and its ability to securely allow teams to share access to a password list I can highly recommend password state.

    Its a great program with a really responsive team behind it. I've used it in two companies now and its proven popular both times.

  131. passwordmaker.org by in_ur_face · · Score: 1

    I use passwordmaker.org which doesn't require keeping anything in a database. It uses a master password combined with a URL to generate a one-way hash which you use as a password. There are browser extensions to make it easy to fill in passwords when logging in (they pre-fill the URL in for you). You can customize the password hash algorithm, character set to use, length of password, and also any prefix or suffix that is to be applied. Since many sites need a capital letter, a number, and a special character I have them static as a suffix to apply to the hash. With these settings it'll generate a password that meets 95% of the sites password requirements.

    http://passwordmaker.org/ is also free.

    Honestly, the harder part is now remembering the username for each site (usually email or a few variations of usernames). I keep a database of my usernames for each site in the cloud.

  132. Password Scheme by Amorak1 · · Score: 1

    I don't write passwords down nor do I store them anywhere. Instead I keep 2 to 4 base passwords and a key in my head at all times. I regularly change the base passwords and key. The passwords are sentences such as "C12hg@S14" from the sentence, "Canada won 2 hockey golds at Sochi 14". Sports events, records and dates make easily remembered sentences. Because some sites don't allow non-alphanumeric characters, I keep a base password with only alphanumerics, such as "Spr2g7r" from the sentence "Slashdot posts are too good to resist" (7 looks enough like 2. Avoid 2 much duplication.) With the key I add two more letters to the password, making the passwords unique for each site. If my current key is 231 and the password is for my Slashdot account, then using the key I would use the 2nd letter of "slashdot" and insert it in the 3rd space of the base password and the 2nd last letter from "slashdot" and insert it in the 1st space from the end of the base password. My password for slashdot would thus become "C12lhg@S1o4". Facebook's password would become "C12ahg@S1o4". I have a single non-alphanumeric character in use at any given time for base passwords that don't have them. If it's currently "+" then I insert it before the second insertion and Spr2g7r"" becomes "Splr2g7+or" for the slashdot account. With this scheme I can operate with only 2 to 4 passwords, complex but easily remembered, and a numeric key. It also allows every site to have its own password using the site's own name. The key tells me what letters come from the site's name and where to insert them. It sounds complicated but, in fact, I can always figure out the password from the base passwords and the key.

  133. Re:Hash functions. by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    unset HISTFILE

    Not good enough. You at least want:

    $ srm ~/.bash_history

    Really? I would think that preventing stuff from being written to the history file is superior to attempting to securely delete it afterwards...

    But then what's in your DRAM? (google: cold boot attack). It all depends on your threat model. Does someone really want to get at those passwords or not?

    I know what a cold boot attack is, thank you. They're just not very straightforward to execute remotely, and not a very common threat in general. But yeah, your point stands that 'unset HISTFILE' won't protect you against that, so if you're really paranoid, you need to combine it with HISTSIZE=0. And pray that the commands aren't somehow left behind somewhere in memory anyway, which sounds a lot like wishful thinking. Which leads us to the argument that if you really want to prevent your computer from giving away any useful information to an advanced attacker with physical access, you have your work cut out for you.

  134. Re:Other question: how to remember a forgotten pas by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    Hypnosis. You'll either remember the forgotten password or you will become stiff as a board and members of the audience will be able to sit on you while you are placed like the seat of a bench between two chairs. Hopefully you'll remember the password. And then bark like a dog.

  135. Re:Insecure but secure enough to keep most people by CCarrot · · Score: 1

    Oh that is a nice thing!!!

    Thank you!!!

    Yeah a little pricey but not crazy expensive at all and totally worth it.

    No problem, I had actually forgotten all about them, so thanks for the reminder! I was looking into them a while back for this very application but I ultimately went with an encrypted password manager on cloud storage instead. Might have to give them another look-see... :)

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  136. Re:write them on a piece of paper by CauseBy · · Score: 1

    For good measure, if your Facebook password is "pickles" and your Gmail password is "bananas", you should set your Dropbox password to "condoms" and your Slashdot password to "anal lube". Then the thief is unlikely to even keep reading the 'shopping list'.

  137. Password Manager for Enterprise by SavySpoon · · Score: 1

    I've seen tons of suggestions for managing passwords for one or two people but what do you do when you need to manage passwords for hundreds of individual systems with passwords URLs? We tested out KeePass but it didn't give any granular controls. Is there anything out there that doesn't break the bank like Thyotic or ManageEngine? Thyotic http://www.thycotic.com/produc... ManageEngine http://www.manageengine.com/pr...

  138. Password? by reylevi · · Score: 1

    I have lot of passwords in every accounts I created before to remember. So eventually I can't remember those all. But those are already listed and have saved in my Google spreadsheet. I also use Passpack aside from spreadsheet. I also used to have them in my desktop, but when I realized with my privacy on it... So that's why I'm now using Google spreadsheet and Passpack. Realizing as well when I have new new account to make is I'm going to make my password short. Then like the password I am using for my other account shall be the same to the new account I am making so that it will be easy for me to remember.