Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Good Print Media Is Left?

guises writes: "A recent story discussing the cover of Byte Magazine reminded me of just how much we've lost with the death of print media. The Internet isn't what took down Byte, but a lot of other really excellent publications have fallen by the wayside as a result of the shift away from the printed page. We're not quite there yet, though. There seem to still be some holdouts, so I'm asking Slashdot: what magazines (or zines, or newsletters, or newspapers) are still hanging around that are worth subscribing to?"

285 comments

  1. The Economist by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Economist. Still worth reading.

    1. Re:The Economist by ADRA · · Score: 2

      Yup, pretty much that and nothing else really. Long live the new flesh!

      --
      Bye!
    2. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once subscribed to 3-5 publications important to me. Some rather expensive. I guess the last one I let go right around 5 years ago. Even the Economist is available as a digital edition.

      I don't know of any myself. Done right digital versions offer some advantages print cannot. Does print offer any advantage over digital beyond not needing a powered device?

    3. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, you can roll up the newspaper or magazine and kill mosquitoes with it.

    4. Re:The Economist by Penguinisto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Done right digital versions offer some advantages print cannot. Does print offer any advantage over digital beyond not needing a powered device?

      One small disadvantage: When I was a kid, I remember a HUGE stack of National Geographic magazines that stat around my grandparents' house. Many of them dated back to IIRC the 1940's and 50's, and some older still... I could sit around as a kid in the 1970's and leaf through them, no problem.

      Would we be able to, 30-40 years hence, be able to even open some of these digital mags without paying (again) for the privilege of doing so? What if the website dies off? What if archive.org didn't, well, archive it?

      Paper may be inefficient at many things, but even magazine publishers that died off a long-assed time ago likely still have one or two copies of their editions floating around somewhere (even if it's sitting in a flea market or antique store...)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    5. Re:The Economist by Panoptes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Old magazines are a complete sense experience. The brittle feel of the paper, the colour as it browns towards the edges of the pages, the (by now) quaint font and layout conventions, the style of language and changes in structure and word usage, idioms and expressions that are no longer current or fashionable; the smell of the paper, the tactile quality of the old covers and binding, the faint noise of opening a long-closed magazine. It's an aesthetic experience that gives the publication a sense of history, a view of another time.

    6. Re:The Economist by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      You can wipe your ass with paper copies. Rip the pages out and cover the walls and windows of your house. Make paper mache with it. Cut up the headlines to make an old fashioned ransom note. Plenty of advantages to paper.

    7. Re:The Economist by icebike · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dono If I believe that.

      The Economist has always had a penchant for saying very little with the largest number of words.

      If you sit down and try to outline one of their major articles, as I recently did, you will see how few points they actually try to make and the inordinate burden they imposed on the reader while making them. And its not like they provide quality supporting documentation to justify their points. Often they simply trout out half truths and over simplifications in point after point of seemingly endless paragraphs of supporting verbiage which provide little enlightenment.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    8. Re:The Economist by TheRealSteveDallas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's also not so easy to put a revision on history when it's in physical copy to be referred to whenever needed. When all your historical documents are digital... how long before it's really possible to claim "Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia"? That would be doubleplus ungood.

    9. Re:The Economist by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Byte is great as a history book of how we got here, until about a year before its demise. It chronicled much, and it served many masters and interests with a lot of personality. It did ok online, but even that folded, and much of what UBM bought is dead, failed in the transition to online.

      There are classic issues, but that was yesterday, and tomorrow much is going to be different. There are still new technologies, some advances, and more than enough cults of code and hardware, now bifurcated into traditional vs mobile computing. Add-in the Maker Movements, 3D printing, and what was once a handful of really creative geeks is now multiple disciplines of them. There's not an easy way to chronicle the computer industry, because it's now industries, reaching everywhere.

      Byte served its purpose well. Long live Byte. Goodbye, Byte, Circuit Cellar, Pournelle, and so many other characters. Long live Ars Technica, Wired, GigaOm, and dozens of other sites like NetworkWorld, InfoWorld, The Register, and so forth. Print will never come back. You won't feel it in your hands until your foldable smartphone makes this comfy some day in the future-- to do again.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    10. Re:The Economist by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      Yes indeed. Our resident mouse-deterrent system will not use the litter box exclusively unless it is laid upon a bed of newspaper. Lacking that, it's about 50/50 whether she'll go in my shower or the preferred location.

      I'm certain there's a rhyme and reason for this behavior, but I find myself unable, as a mere alpha primate, to understand her great feline intellect.

      In an attempt to bring her into the electronic age, I placed some transcripts from Reddit beneath and around her beloved evacuation site. It kept her out of my shower, but her aim began to suffer, and more of her scat hit the paper than the litter.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    11. Re:The Economist by supernova87a · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, and maybe this is just an American bias, but the writing style of the Economist is highly irritating. I finish reading a third of it, and I feel like I've just been given a lecture. Then I toss it in the recycling.

    12. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, better off listen to it. At least if you do something else while listening to a crappy article it wouldn't be a complete waste of time.

    13. Re:The Economist by Silh · · Score: 1

      Does print offer any advantage over digital beyond not needing a powered device?

      It can be physically abused, without risking damage to a potentially expensive electronic device... for myself, namely in the waiting area for patients at my office.

      Sure, lots of people just play around/read on their smartphones these days, but for those who are not, I'd rather have a bunch of magazines which they can flip through if they're looking for something different to read, rather than providing an electronic device for them to do the same.

      Also preferable for active, destructive, kids. :P

      --
      -- Silhouette
    14. Re:The Economist by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      Circuit Cellar's still around, and not half bad, actually.

    15. Re:The Economist by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      I read Nuts&Volts. Still fun.... once in a while.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    16. Re:The Economist by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Often they simply trout out half truths and over simplifications in point after point of seemingly endless paragraphs of supporting verbiage which provide little enlightenment.

      Well, to be fair, it is economics. Not sure what else they could do.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    17. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Economist is actually a news magazine. It actually has very little economics content, apart from the business articles.

    18. Re:The Economist by icebike · · Score: 1

      Not as much as it once was.
      Go surf their site, they cover a wide wide variety of topics.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    19. Re:The Economist by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I can read a magazine on the toilet, I refuse to take a laptop in there (I don't even own my own, it's a work laptop and it stays at the office). I can't read anything on a smartphone period, the text is too tiny and the interface is awful, smartphones are badly designed nuisances. Similarly, I can read a book or magazine in bed, but not the smartphone and not my desktop computer and I will never own a tablet. I can read the paper or a magazine on a train or plane, but electronic substitutes fail badly there for me (and the books never run out of batteries).

    20. Re:The Economist by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      You can barely find stuff from 5 years ago on the web. Some stuff yes, but most of it vanishes or becomes very difficult to locate using modern search tools which are oriented towards serving up ads and hits for what's popular and current.

    21. Re:The Economist by unitron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Try different newspapers and see if she's expressing a political view.

      Or tabloid versus traditional fold in the middle, see if it's a class thing.

      Let me know how she feels about USA Today.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    22. Re:The Economist by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      You seem a little over-exaggerating, but I can relate to the GP. In the late '90s when I was in art class we would pick through old National Geographics from the '60s and '70s. Half the fun was looking at the old ads. Especially car ads for some reason. Looking at old car ads in any old media is always a hoot.

    23. Re:The Economist by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      The brittle feel of the paper ... the tactile quality of the old covers and binding...

      It also makes the magazines difficult to wet or use as toilet paper, and hence means they tend to last longer as reading material for the John.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    24. Re:The Economist by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can barely find stuff from 5 years ago on the web. Some stuff yes, but most of it vanishes or becomes very difficult to locate using modern search tools which are oriented towards serving up ads and hits for what's popular and current.

      Google seems to be getting worse as time progresses. Back when Google was just coming around (early '00), and Altavista was dominant, to search for ALL words (Boolean AND) in a query: +you +had +to +put +a +plus +in +front +of +everything or else it assumed a Boolean OR.

      Google assumed you wanted Boolean AND.

      Now in Google "+you" "+need" "+quotes" "+and" "+plus" for Boolean AND, or else it will search Boolean OR/ALL_SYNONYMS.

      I'm also getting kinda sad because useful Usenet discussion is vanishing. My city used to have a reasonably active Usenet group. It is now a wasteland, and there's no good Forum replacements. And of what forums there are (for any and all subjects), Archive.org or otherwise don't archive them as well as old Usenet discussions are on Deja / Google Groups.

    25. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Economist has enormous value - as a contrarian indicator. In the 30-odd years I've been reading it, they've been diametrically wrong on every major issue. No 'good' analyst is that infallible.

      (ERM, EMU & AGW are just the most obvious examples.)

      As has often been observed, the Economist's dark secret is that it's written by green kids pretending to be old fogies. (Nigel Lawson called them 'teenage scribblers'.) Like Wikipedia, it's good as a source of bare factual information - e.g. the cost of a Big Mac in Wotdefukistan - but like Wikipedia, it's really crap on contentious subjects - like whether Swedes or Norwegians invented salt liquorice.

    26. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generations of boys grew up ogling the naked boobies in the National Geographic. My father did it (on a small island in the Indian Ocean), and I did it (in a coal mining town in the North of England). I can't see my sons bothering (anywhere with an internet connection).

    27. Re:The Economist by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      penchant for saying very little with the largest number of words

      Grasshopper, you must value the journey as much as the destination.

    28. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Given that all your use cases are solved by a tablet and your complaint about smartphones is solved by a tablet... Why exactly will you never own one? Gypsy curse? Restraining order? Technomasochism?

    29. Re:The Economist by volmtech · · Score: 1

      My mother found some National Geographics from 1915-17 in a house she and my dad rented. Those auto ads were a double hoot, and the bare chested New Guinea native women. I was born in 1952. I watched the 60s and 70s ads on television.

    30. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is by far the most scathing condemnation of The Economist I have ever read. I hope for your sake their anti-libel lawyer isn't reading.

    31. Re:The Economist by blahplusplus · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately you don't understand what science has discovered, human beings aren't very good judges of their own thinking and reasoning.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    32. Re:The Economist by able1234au · · Score: 1

      Tablets are great for simple browsing. Most of my use of my iPad is casual browsing the web and reading books. It goes in the toilet with me but i guess i should steralise it a bit more often. The reading experience is different to a laptop. You would think it would be the same but it is not. Form and function i guess.

    33. Re:The Economist by able1234au · · Score: 1

      Actually while Reddit has a lot of rubbish, it also has a lot of good content and good intelligent contributors. Also the ranking system that puts good answers to the top does usually work and while the linear approach of slashdot has some merit, in slashdot we end up with "frist post" rubbish up the top and you have to wade through content to get to the good stuff. So i miss Usenet too, but usenet was about the contributors, and they are on Reddit.

    34. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Playboy ;-)))

    35. Re:The Economist by Dynamoo · · Score: 1

      Similarly, if you dig out an old copy of BYTE or something similar, it is the *ads* which can be more interesting than the articles. You want *how* *much* for *that*??

      --
      Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    36. Re:The Economist by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Most of the local discussion groups seem to have moved to G+ or Facebook. You can always sign up with a pseudonym if you really want to participate, but yeah... Nothing like the good old days.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    37. Re:The Economist by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Economist has always had a penchant for saying very little with the largest number of words.

      I find that the Economist has a very high information density. Not just in its headline topic but in many other areas of journalism, too.

      As for "half-truths and over simplifications", that's not my experience. Maybe you just don't understand a lot of the rather complex concepts and language that their professional and technically proficient writers use?

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    38. Re:The Economist by shrewdsheep · · Score: 1

      I am digitally subscribed to Scientific American (German version) which is delivierd in DRM-free pdf. I remember that I relished just browsing magazines when I was young and I believe that this experience is gone for good. However, the experience can come close by using the internet to browse the issues and then bringing up the pdf on the tablet.

    39. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    40. Re:The Economist by wooferhound · · Score: 2

      . Print will never come back. You won't feel it in your hands until your foldable smartphone makes this comfy some day in the future-- to do again.

      What will I read In the Doctors office if print media dies ?

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    41. Re:The Economist by GTRacer · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, I doubt the "entertainment" genre is dying off with the same rapidity as technical is. Tabloids in particular will continue to fester for years to come.

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    42. Re:The Economist by Andover+Chick · · Score: 1

      I mostly like the Economist and have read it for years. Does a good job with financial analysis and the occasional tech article. Although it has been getting a bit extreme with immigration issues lately. It has always been pro-migration but it seems to have abandoned it relatively moderate view in be past few years. Btw, "More Intelligent Life", also published by the Economist online, is a fun read.

    43. Re:The Economist by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      +1

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    44. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your own media on your own server.

      I know that's not a solution for everyone yet, but nearly anyone on Slashdot can handle it, and that's enough digital archivists to make a reasonably reliable record.

    45. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll just drop this off here:

      if you took all the economists in the world and laid them end-to-end around the planet, they would never reach a conclusion...

      teach a parrot to say 'supply and demand', and you have an economist...

    46. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "trout"?

      Surprised that got through your editing before you hit "Submit"...

    47. Re:The Economist by Sporkinum · · Score: 2

      The same issues of magazines that are currently there. They never change.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    48. Re:The Economist by dywolf · · Score: 1

      same thing. grandparents have Nat Geo mags going back to 1945. I read their entire collection over the course of a 6 or 7 summers of visits in the 90s. I'd gladly include Nat Geo on the list of magazines to read. I'd include Life if it was still around, but since its not, I have to be content with tracking down old TimeLife books when the libraries sell off older collections. The geography ones ("The Sierra Madre", "The Russian Steppes"...) were a high point of photo essay literature. Life itself is to me just such an iconic publication I find it hard to accept that it went away. I get that the internet makes it theoretically easier to do the same thing (visually travel to far off places)...but it the coherence and thematic consistancy of the Life publications and books as I remember them.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    49. Re:The Economist by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Economist
      National Geographic
      Analog
      NYTimes
      New Yorker
      Discover Magazine
      Time
      Life, before it went out of print...still worth tracking down copies if you can.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    50. Re:The Economist by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Does print offer any advantage over digital beyond not needing a powered device?

      Personally, I am not sold that digital versions will stand up to the test of time. Printer versions pretty much only go out with decay or change of language which happen very slowly. Digital has it's own decay issues but proper back up will probably make it better than print, but I am uncertain that word docs, pdfs, or even text files will be compatible with future versions of similar readers a few decades from now. Will Adobe Acrobat 45 be able to update and open something made with Adobe Acrobat 4 accurately and reliably? Then there are revision issues. I can usually be certain that nobody has reprinted an old book with changes and if they have, there will be proper notation of this on the copyright page. Not so sure, I can tell how old a digital document is or that it hasn't been changed.

    51. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. The Economist is not perfect, or at least I do not agree with all its positions, but its writing is clear and concise and it is very much on top of events with insightful reporting and analysis. You must be confusing it with Time Magazine. It stands head and shoulders above any other comparable paper in any language.

    52. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...like whether Swedes or Norwegians invented salt liquorice."

      we need to know who to blame for that absolutely disgusting shit

    53. Re:The Economist by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Similarly, if you dig out an old copy of BYTE or something similar, it is the *ads* which can be more interesting than the articles. You want *how* *much* for *that*??

      Occasionally you find an old flyer for an electronics store too. Get to see the price for 27" CRT TVs, $4000 prices for ugly ass beige Pentium 100 computers, film cameras, etc.

    54. Re:The Economist by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Most of the local discussion groups seem to have moved to G+ or Facebook. You can always sign up with a pseudonym if you really want to participate, but yeah... Nothing like the good old days.

      Unless I'm missing something, G+ and Facebook don't have nice threaded searchable discussions the way Usenet or a Forum do. Usenet benefits from being decentralized service, and I actually enjoyed using a desktop client. G+ and Facebook are the opposite, and are worse at archiving or searching than Forums. I find for tech-support, Forums / Usenet seems to be where a LOT of solutions are found, as it lets users with similar issues notice a trend, and pound away at their findings and solutions as they go, in a media that gets recorded, where the users aren't organized / patient enough to add that data to a Wiki somewhere.

    55. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the adverts - patent remedies for the medical problems that our grandparents used to obsess about; early technology when it was first introduced; etc.

    56. Re:The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me make a guess: those "half truths" you refer to are regarding the Economists take on climate change?

    57. Re:The Economist by xeos · · Score: 1

      I find the Economist to be much higher info density than any other print magazine I've looked at recently. Not a long list I admit, but still I'm shocked you would say it's low density. Maybe you just aren't interested in the content.

  2. I have 1 subscription by jmd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    funnytimes.com

    All I need.

  3. National Geographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Very good photography, good enough writing.

    1. Re:National Geographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped NG a long time ago because it became a picture magazine that I could flip through in 10 minutes. The prose became an afterthought. My parents were very liberal regarding material that came into the house, provided it had merit and NF fit the bill. I was gifted a subscription from the age of 9 until 29, when I told my father it just wasn't worth it anymore. He had noticed it too. Instead of digesting one story in a day or two over the course of a week, I was flipping through in 20 minutes like I said earlier. This all played out from 1977 to 1992, IIRC. The very first magazines I received as a boy still had a trace of the leafy looking decoration around the cover.

      Anyway, not to knock their photograph... but it came at the expense of the prose which made the magazine format less appealing. I understand I might be in a distinct minority here. It just reminds me too much of Life magazine now, and we all know how that went.

    2. Re:National Geographic by pooh666 · · Score: 1

      I quit them because of their god aweful marketing machine. Junk snailmail from everything.

    3. Re:National Geographic by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Admit it, you just like the 3D holographic jungle tits on the special edition covers. You know, the "Silver Star" edition that comes out every 18 months if you buy the extra......nevermind.

  4. Who Cares? by NReitzel · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Good print media?

    Really. Local newspaper provides enough to wrap up stuff to ship, and a few sheets to use to light charcoal.

    Other than that, who cares?

    --

    Don't take life too seriously; it isn't permanent.

    1. Re:Who Cares? by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      My local newspaper is down to printing only three days a week. Not too many years ago they printed two editions per day seven days a week. I subscribe to just the Sunday edition, but that's just to get the ads and the sports columns.

    2. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good print media?

      Really. Local newspaper provides enough to wrap up stuff to ship, and a few sheets to use to light charcoal.

      Other than that, who cares?

      Well, if you find yourself in a bind while taking a dump, you can wipe your ass with that print media after you're done thumbing through it.

      (sorry, was fresh out of car analogies. Came up with this shitty one instead.)

    3. Re:Who Cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My parrot needs the Norwegian Times at the bottom of his cage, otherwise he's pining for the fjords.

  5. TP by Russ1642 · · Score: 2

    They haven't started making digital toilet paper yet.

    1. Re:TP by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for my toilet paper to boot up . . .

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
  6. Your local newspaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nowhere else will you find detailed reporting regarding events and issues that may actually impact your life. Some have said that social media will kill local newspapers but I find that real news is still better covered by a reporter than by hearsay on my Facebook wall. Local reporters work hard to produce a paper every day (or every week, depending on your community), the least we can do is subscribe to their publication to help foot the bill of good reporting.

    1. Re:Your local newspaper by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Here in Australia, my experience is that the genuinely local newspapers (limited to specific suburbs or council areas and usually available for free every week) are great as a way of finding out whats going on in the local area. The normal daily newspapers are full of crap and not worth reading.

    2. Re:Your local newspaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be nice. All of my local papers are nothing but regurgitation of wire service stories. They don't have real reporting anymore. I would doubt there are more than a handful of newspapers left in the entire US that have any kind of reporting staff or any kind of real journalistic integrity.

      The digital world isn't killing journalists. We don't have to print ink on dead trees to have real journalism. The medium is irrelevant. As long as people are out there asking questions and trying to find truth, we'll have journalism. Even if it's published on a website, a smartphone app, or anything else.

    3. Re:Your local newspaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bullshit, 90-99% of 'local' papers are ad vehicles and nothing more... (not that there ads aren't going away too...)
      you will NEVER (again, for 90-99% of the local papers) see them doing REAL reporting that actually informs people about local skullduggery and shitty bidness practices...
      you think they are going to do a series on how car dealerships rip you off ? really, when half their ad revenue comes from them ?
      so, fill in the blank with virtually any local story of corruption, etc, and you will find they will NOT cover that story (same with teevee news) 'cause they either don't want to bite the hand that feeds them, or the local chamber of commerce fascists will punish them...

      local movies and schedules, super useful !
      kitty stuck in a tree ? sure, that's important, let's get film on that...
      some idiotic kerfuffle on the local board over some nothingburger ? sure, they'll let that simmer for weeks...
      but REAL corruption, REAL injustice, REAL bad bidness behavior ?
      UNLESS it blows up too big for them to ignore, they WILL ignore it...

    4. Re:Your local newspaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. It's about the content and the local newspaper generates local news that is not available anywhere else and at better quality than Marge puts on Facebook or Twitter. The metros are dead (or nearly so) since they are just another way of sending out AP/Reuters/etc to people who already get it online.

  7. Lapham's Quarterly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.laphamsquarterly.org/ is still putting out amazing topic-oriented journals printed on comfortable paper. Their current issue is about Revolutions and their previous issue was Comedy. The subscription cost is worth every penny.

    1. Re:Lapham's Quarterly by guises · · Score: 1

      Thank you, this is exactly the sort of thing that I was looking for from this thread. That looks like an excellent publication that I'd never heard of before.

  8. Whatever you're interested in by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1

    I like my tech magazines and news digital. I like my Muscle & Fitness and Popular Science in print. It's personal preference really.

    1. Re:Whatever you're interested in by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

      I still enjoy getting magazines in the mail. I find them more satisfying than trying to read something on a tablet. Mostly I get woodworking magazines (Woodworker's Journal and Fine Woodworking). I also get the print edition of MSDN Magazine, which I like to take with me when I go to lunch.

  9. Make Magazine by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lots of good stuff. Byte could have morphed itself into this magazine.

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    1. Re:Make Magazine by Shadyman · · Score: 1

      +1 for Make

    2. Re:Make Magazine by rijrunner · · Score: 1

      The thing is, Byte, Datamation, and a few others quit being really must read for techs long before the Internet really hit.

      In the IT field back in the late 80's through about 2000, the scariest thing to see would be an executive with a glossy magazine..

    3. Re:Make Magazine by fermion · · Score: 1

      One thing that surprises me is that every talks about Byte, but not the spin off of a great column in Byte, Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar. Circuit Cellar is a bit expensive, and very technical, but if you like really making hardware it is a must. Circuit Cellar is the part of byte that was hardware making. There was another part that review and broad industry connections, another part that was software, and of course the musings of Jerry Pournelle. If you are into reading international English fiction, Granta is also a must have.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:Make Magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +2 for Make :)

    5. Re:Make Magazine by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      I loved Circuit Cellar in Byte. Steve was a good writer. I usually complain of magazines losing their focus. In this case, I'm complaining that Circuit Cellar magazine narrowed its focus too much. For me. Maybe not for hardcore hardware hackers.

  10. Paecon by blahplusplus · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You won't get the US centric perspective that you get from the economist.

    http://www.paecon.net/

    1. Re:Paecon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank goodness I don't get a US centric perspective from the Economist. I read it for the same reason I sometimes watch Al Jazeera: it's good journalism from a perspective I need to understand to function well in the big wide world.

    2. Re:Paecon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it's good journalism from a perspective I need to understand to function well in the big wide world."

      Nope, you see it through the lens of what you want to believe to be true unfortunately. Science has shown, people can't reason worth a damn.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  11. P0RN by Trachman · · Score: 1

    P0RN is will always be a good niche for certain type of clientele. Leaves no electronic trace also, does not require electricity and information in such type of magazines will rarely result in additional search in internets.

    1. Re:P0RN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'd not touch p0rn with a 10-ft pole.
      • If you get it by subscription, the post office is photographing it. And you're probably on a list for getting paper bag covered material. Therefore you are a terrorist.
      • If you get it at the newsstand and pay with credit, see above.
      • If you get it at the newsstand and pay cash, you might be OK. But only so long as no one sees you and gossips it to the world on Myspace / Facebook / Wordpress / what-ever

      If you so much as touch p0rn, you can forget a career in politics or even kid's shows. Just ask Paul Mall/Paul Reubins about that.

  12. The Guardian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Guardian is always worth a read.

  13. "print" vs "digital" is pointless distinction by globaljustin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    TFA has it all wrong from the start.

    The problem is, from a cybernetic perspective, the internet is just words, pictures and video at the presentation layer...

    **its not inherently different** The **channel** for the information is different, but it's the same type of information

    both a print & digital news requires a *reporter* and *editor*

    a blog can never be the "paper of record"...it has to be an institutional entity with accountability

    yes, of course the transition to digital formats was **mismanaged** by the non-journalism side of most news operations, but that is because the businesspeople made the same mistake TFA makes...thinking a digital news story is somehow inherently different b/c the channel is different

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
    1. Re:"print" vs "digital" is pointless distinction by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your point is only true in theory, but not in fact. Because of how it evolved, the Internet broke the culture of willingness to pay for journalism. This has turned out to have some bad consequences - namely a decline in quality, and the dominance of ad-supported information, and unthinking acceptance of the ad-supported press.

    2. Re:"print" vs "digital" is pointless distinction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The channel can make all the difference. Remember when software distribution and patching was done with floppy disks? When bugs were hard to patch you're damn right there were fewer bugs. Now software distribution is fast and patching is easy. This didn't make software more reliable, it just made it more buggy. It's just like Jevons Paradox.

      With print media you have lots of eyes looking at the quality of the final printed page because, let's face it, once it goes out of the door the only thing that can follow is massive embarrassment if you get it wrong. A blog on the other hand can be edited, patched and fixed quite easily. The same thing happens...the quality goes right down.

      I still see print as being a higher standard and a higher quality. Heck, even the BIOS setup screens of some PCs contain some raging typos and Engrish. That code is on flash ROM and we still believe we don't need to fix it. Or we don't believe we need to fix it yet. Or ever.

    3. Re:"print" vs "digital" is pointless distinction by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      Perhaps we have moved towards an "on-demand" style of consuming.
      We're not reading an article anymore because an editor assumed we had to read it.
      Instead, we're reading an article because we were actively looking for it.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
  14. Your local newspaper. by SocialEngineer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Disclaimer: I've worked for 2 newspapers, and currently work for a media company (in the online division).

    Why? Because a local newspaper is going to cover more relevant info, with more details, than numerous other mediums. It's an at-your-leisure consumption device, too.

    I get the Sat. & Sun. local papers here. The Sat. for general weekend news, and the Sun. for big feature stories. Our paper frequently has some amazing local content; I recall a great 2 page spread on a local barbershop, and when one of the historic buildings burned down, they had almost daily coverage on the progress.

    Plus, it's great for information on important city council stuff. Our city has been having the Great Trash Debate for some time, and now it's finally coming to a close (trying to figure out if trash pickup should be privatized, or if they should increase the cost of trash stickers to cover rising costs of maintenance for the trucks).

    If you live in a major metro area, seek out the smaller hyper-local publications for your area.

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    1. Re:Your local newspaper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The local newspaper here is 8 - 12 pages, with only 2 pages of news, the rest ads and local sports. If you don't follow the local high school sports teams theres nothing of interest.

    2. Re:Your local newspaper. by sootman · · Score: 1

      > when one of the historic buildings burned down,
      > they had almost daily coverage on the progress.

      Wow. Must've taken a long time to burn down. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    3. Re:Your local newspaper. by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Same here. The local paper used to be a big deal with local color, news and editorial. Now it's a leaflet of its former self.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    4. Re:Your local newspaper. by SocialEngineer · · Score: 1

      Definitely a shame, but one big reason why your local paper isn't that big is because of a lack of financial support. The paper I used to work at in my previous town of residence went the same way; they weren't able to generate enough revenue for the corporate owners, so they had to budget less for news and more for advertising in order to stay afloat.

      In cases like that, the best you can hope for is a change in leadership/ownership of the paper. I myself would love to see newspapers go non-profit.

      --
      "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
    5. Re:Your local newspaper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      80% of the "News" in my local has a Reuters by-line. The remaining 20% consists of more editorial content then actual news. So the argument that the local newspaper is going to cover more relevant info is at least for MY local paper, sadly, false. Still it does work well to line the bird's cage.

  15. Magazines by slapout · · Score: 1

    For .Net developers:

    Code Magazine
    MSDN Magazine
    DNC Magazine(Not a print magazine, but it is a PDF that you can print out.)

    General Computing:

    CPU Magazine (not as good as it used to be, but still not bad)
    Maximum PC

    My local bookstore carries quite a few Linux magazines imported from Great Britain.

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:Magazines by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      And Oracle just cut loose with Java Magazine. I now have a vague notion wtf Hadoop is.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  16. There are exactly two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Economist, and
    The Christian Science Monitor

    1. Re:There are exactly two by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Economist, and
      The Christian Science Monitor

      One of those titles is an oxymoron.

    2. Re:There are exactly two by unitron · · Score: 1

      The Economist, and
      The Christian Science Monitor

      Didn't CSM shut down its print edition a while back?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:There are exactly two by unitron · · Score: 1

      The Economist, and
      The Christian Science Monitor

      One of those titles is an oxymoron.

      Nonsense! If there is such a thing as Christian Science, then it certainly should be closely monitored.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  17. Wall Street Journal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read this everyday, you'll be amazed at how informed you will be.

    1. Re:Wall Street Journal by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      If you read this everyday, you'll be amazed at how informed you will be.

      For various definitions of 'informed'.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  18. Analog Science Fiction & Fact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Definitely still worth a subscription today, as it has been for decades. Last I checked, the cost of a print subscription was the same as an electronic subscription; difference is, my kids are more likely to be able to read the print version in a decade.

    1. Re:Analog Science Fiction & Fact by hendrikboom · · Score: 2

      I've been trying to maintain an e-subscription to to Analog for some time now, mostly because I've run out of room for books in my hose and I've reached the point where, for every paper book that comes into the house, I need to find a book to throw out. It has been an exercise in frustration. e-subscriptions are handled by independent businesses, not by the publisher (as paper ones seem to be). And they've been closing one after another. First fictionwise closed, apparently subsumed by Barnes & Noble, which sells only within the US. I switch to Sony despite their reputation with rootkits. Then the Sony reader drops my subscription so I have to resubscribe, and a few months later the reader store closes to North American subscribers. They've handed over their customers to Kobo, which in OK for books (I read my books on a Kobo device anyway), but they abandoned their magazine subscribers. Kobo, on the other hand, treats Analog like most epublishers treat magazines, that is, as throwaway items. They even delete your magazines as a service when they're a certain number of months old. I'm told it's possible to take some action to keep them around longer, but I have no idea what that is.

      Not to mention the ever-present DRM.

      Publishers need to get their act together if e-publication is to work for readers. Tor and Baen seem to have figured it out. Few others.
         

  19. WIRED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    i just renewed my WIRED subscription. it's still dirt cheap, is entertaining to read, and has a nice cover. yeah, it's about half ads, but whatevs. if you're not used to blocking ads, you're some sort of time-traveler from... hmm, when did we not have advertising?

    1. Re:WIRED by nullchar · · Score: 1

      +1 for WIRED in paper format. The layout is beautiful and ever-changing.

      Infoporn anyone?

    2. Re:WIRED by rickb928 · · Score: 2

      Did you guilt them into a discount? I got a renewal for some stupid amount, $24/yr or so, and I called and told them it was over. The phone rep caved and I got an $11/yr renewal.

      So I have now only missed Vol1 No1. The streak continues. And it is still worth reading, since they appear to have stamped out may of the gratuitous optical gimmicks that rendered it virtually unreadable in the early 00s. Migraine effects, which now only show up once or twice an issue. I'm still convinced they design around whatever press ink is in the 'oops' bin at the distributor, or on clearance.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  20. Archaeology, IEEE Spectrum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's all we get in the mail. My wife got Mother Jones for a while.

    I like Archaeology, it's pretty old school, even has classifieds in the back.

    1. Re:Archaeology, IEEE Spectrum by nospam007 · · Score: 2

      "I like Archaeology, it's pretty old school,..."

      It usually is.

    2. Re:Archaeology, IEEE Spectrum by lecoupdejarnac · · Score: 1

      +1 for Mother Jones, there aren't nearly as many organizations doing deep investigative reporting as there used to be.

  21. The Atlantic Monthly by quarnap · · Score: 2

    The last of the general interest genre.

  22. Dupe by dovf · · Score: 1

    A year ago almost to the day a very similar question was discussed here: http://ask.slashdot.org/story/... But I'll respond the same way I did there: Science News!

    1. Re:Dupe by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

      Science News is available online, though.

      --
      Design for Use, not Construction!
  23. The Pitchfork Review, SPIN Mag, Under the Radar by DaBombDotCom · · Score: 1

    I subscribe to all three, they are fantastic. Music print media is still alive and strong in my opinion.

  24. Niche publications... by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 2

    I write for and read a niche publication related to an obscure hobby of mine (related to model trains) and it actually sells very well and they still pay well for contributions. Mostly because the target audience is retirees who are of a generation that are used to and comfortable reading the printed page, and are happy to pay for it. Many of these people also supplement their subscription with online forum discussions, which has changed the nature of the magazine. The primary focus is on lengthy how-to articles that people would not normally compile for free and post online due to the time and effort involved, but are happy to put into print because they (and I) are being paid for it. Club announcements and updates and stuff are less needed thanks to online forums.

    The one thing the magazine has not done is embraced a digital version and made their archives available digitally. One magazine that has done this to great effect is Model Railroader. Rather than collect stacks of back issues, you can now get the whole set online or on discs. One of the main issues depends on what the original contract with the writers looked like. If it did not have a 'and all future media' type clause, you would have to seek individual permission from each contributor to make the back issues available digitally. That has been one of the things holding back the particular magazine I write for. I myself am all in favor of making back issues available digitally. At the very least they could sell a digital edition beginning with new issues, with a new contract for the writers that includes it.

    As far as mainstream periodicals, I occasionally like to pick up a Wall Street Journal or a New York Times when at an Airport, but 99.9% of my current news intake happens online these days. Financial Times of London is a good one, but again can be had online.

    what I do read exclusively in printed form is books. I just like them, and I like to keep the best ones for re-reading later. Mine will be among the last generation to prefer this most likely.

    1. Re:Niche publications... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a highschool student who loves the smell of books but can see the writing on the wall, I'm going to say your generation is going to be the last to prefer to read books as well. Many of my fellows cannot read a proper book, nor can they focus on anything for more than a few minutes; but, maybe that will improve. I hope so.

    2. Re:Niche publications... by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Yep, model RR, R/C aircraft, and a few other categories are the only ones that seem both stable and likely to stick to their old formulae these days. Hey, and thanks for your work. I'm pretty sure you're not making a killing from it.

  25. Make and W.I.R.E.D. by the.o.ster.66 · · Score: 2

    Make and WIRED are my two current print subscriptions. (W.I.R.E.D. is fantastically infuriating to type)

    1. Re:Make and W.I.R.E.D. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make and WIRED are my two current print subscriptions. (W.I.R.E.D. is fantastically infuriating to read)

      FTFY

    2. Re:Make and W.I.R.E.D. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F.T.F.Y.

      FTFY

    3. Re:Make and W.I.R.E.D. by necro81 · · Score: 1

      I still have a subscription to WIRED because I still find some new trends in consumer tech there. Other times they'll report on something and I'll think to myself "Damn, I heard about that through IEEE Spectrum, Make:, or somewhere online months or years ago. Where the hell have these guys been?"

      About every other month one of their long-form articles will genuinely satisfy. I highly recommend the 20th anniversary compendium of their best long-form stuff.

      I will note, however, that the satisfying long-form stuff is never their cover article. The development of the cover article, and accompanying eye-catching cover, usually goes like this:

      1) take some topic that has been floating around the zeitgeist for a bit. For example - "The capabilities of 3D printers have been improving for years, while costs have been going down"
      2) throw one or two contemporary data points at it, "The original RepRap was a piece of shit, and cost $$$ plus a year's worth of tinkering to build and get running properly. The latest $Machine produces passably good knicknacks, works out of the box (mostly), and only costs $$."
      3) take it to its most illogical, hyperbolic, and unsupported conclusion. "Soon we will never go shopping, we will produce all consumer goods in our own basement for pennies!"
      4) find a celebrity to put on the cover. Anyone, really, will do.
      5) give the Art department a hit of LSD and Red Bull, then create the cover from (3) and (4),
      6) ???,
      7) Profit!

      So, yes, I find WIRED to have enough useful and interesting content to continue paying a subscription price for it. But I open each issue with modest expectations, and drop it off at the gym for someone else to read as soon as I'm done with it.

  26. Short news is dead, long analysis lives. by Ghostworks · · Score: 1

    "Long read" periodicals, which rely on research or expertise are still worth reading. The Economist and Foreign Policy are tow that stick out in my mind.

    Local news may or may not be good. When national coverage dominates, you're basically getting a watered down version of last week's CNN. When local coverage dominates, at least you know there was was probably no other source for that information.

    Industry Journals probably cover esoteric topic no one else will, so those count if your are actually interested in the esoteric topics.

    Sadly, the niche, hobby magazine is pretty much dead. Big players release news and content directly to the web, and the best commentary is spread around blogs and web-zines. In fact, if the bulk of a magazine can be described as "news about X", or a "a community newsletter for Y", then it's dead.

    1. Re:Short news is dead, long analysis lives. by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      I mostly agree, with a few exceptions. Home Power, for one. Classic Cars, Classic & Sports Car, and a few others sometimes have some practical articles that would actually be of use to a buyer or owner actually touching the mechanical parts themselves! A few rags like Hot Rod (at least used to) still have hands-on articles, though their preoccupation with cars that sucked even when they were new gets annoying (flame-bait comment: Chevelles, for example). Model RRers have several from which to choose. Still I think, like Home Power, the niche/hobby mags that are decent come from true believers. Some of them never make a profit, but that's not their primary reason for doing it.

  27. Better question by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    What good media exists at all.

    I say none.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Better question by schnell · · Score: 1

      Then how are you informed about what is happening in technology, in world affairs, in your local area or anything else if there are no good media?

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
    2. Re:Better question by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      There is passable ( and suspect ) media, but not 'good'

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  28. National Geographic by richtopia · · Score: 1

    Easy enough to leaf through, colorful enough to justify printing. I keep one in the map pocket of my car for waiting at airports.

  29. Circuit Cellar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yep

  30. Good print media.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well they are available either print or digital but the Circuit Cellar / Elektor mags are good.

  31. Science Magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would classify New Scientist (http://www.newscientist.com) as an excellent subscription magazine. The quality of the printed pictures and graphs is a great addition to nice science articles.

  32. NYTimes is left I believe. by BoRegardless · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least according to Rush.

    1. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Do people REALLY still cling to the myth that the New York Times is not a left-wing newspaper? Puh-leez. We're adults here, people. In this day and age, we're still denying basic facts like this? You don't believe me, do you?

      Is The New York Times a Liberal Newspaper? Of course it is.
      --Source: The New York Times.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by Kyont · · Score: 3, Funny

      So they say! Although it is unclear why Geddy, Alex and Neil would be weighing in on this issue in the first place.

      --
      You shall see a cow on the roof of a cotton house.
    3. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by stox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course it is Liberal, anything having to do with facts or science is Liberal these days.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    4. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The thing is, the NYT has a lot of high quality articles still, even if their newsroom is all liberal. They go deeply into subjects and do good research. You shouldn't believe everything they say, and if it's important, you should verify; but they give you good overview of the world.

      Another high quality newspaper is the Wall Street Journal. If you're looking for print, it can't be beat, for similar reasons. The main difference is the WSJ focuses more on economic issues, and the NYT focuses more on social issues.

      The editorial staff of both newspapers is mediocre, but the quality of the guest editorials can't be beaten, in both papers. You have ex presidents, or the commanding officer of the armed forces of Lebanon. Maybe you don't agree with the guest editorials, but they are often worth reading, more than the average blogger.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by unitron · · Score: 0

      Of course the NYT is liberal, remember how liberally Judith Miller helped Cheney sell the war?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    6. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do facts or science have to do with the NYTimes?
      Opinion and propaganda they have by the bucket full and more.

      What was their motto again?
      "Integrity, we've heard of it."

    7. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by dywolf · · Score: 1

      The NYTimes is as close to middle of the road journalistic integrity as you can get. It is far, FAR from being "just a liberal rag". They print opinion pieces from nearly anyone, on any subject, on nearly any stance. They just recently published Jenny MacCarthy. In the past they've published Ronald Reagan. They've written both in support and against the middle east involvements, often in the same issue.

      The Grey Lady is not to treated so badly or dismissed so simply.

      Also, if your opinion is that simply using facts and logic are what make one a liberal, then that implies that a lack of those things is what makes one a conservative....and certain individuals are doing a VERY good job of proving that point.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    8. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Another "good old days" comment... years ago, WSJ had a decent editorial staff, and reported "economics" issues as often as "financial" issues. Now it's more honest to its name—just about Wall Street. Another Murdoch victim.

    9. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Are you upset about the fact they use color or something? Yours is the most idiotic and wrong comment I've read all week on Slashdot, just so you know.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    10. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      false

    11. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it is Liberal, anything having to do with facts or science is Liberal these days.

      Unless it has to do with guns.

    12. Re:NYTimes is left I believe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because, what? You don't know the difference between economics and finance? Or, I see, you're paid by News Corp.

  33. here's one I really like by sribe · · Score: 2
  34. Infowars Magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.infowarsshop.com/-Infowars-Magazine_c_65.html

    Unbelievable well-done mag.

    1. Re:Infowars Magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1000

  35. Yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What good print media is left?"

    Yes.

    Print is a medium, so yes, it is still there. A newspaper, or magazine, it's a publication, not a medium.

    You mean "What good print publications are left?"

    1. Re:Yes. by unitron · · Score: 1

      "What good print media is left?"

      Yes.

      Print is a medium, so yes, it is still there. A newspaper, or magazine, it's a publication, not a medium.

      You mean "What good print publications are left?"

      In that case, shouldn't it be "What good print media are left?", media being plural and all?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  36. Lucky Peach and Archaeology by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

    Two magazines I still read in print are Lucky Peach and Archaeology.
    Lucky Peach is a bit of insanity: Food travel, recipes, and steam of consciousness weirdness. Not cheap, and so far as I can tell, not all of it is available online.
    Archaeology is great because you get to see real science actually in use -- unlike the pap most newspapers post, where the big words are all left out. It does have digital subscriptions, but because most of its articles are short, I'm happy to take this into the (ahem) powder room, where I really don't want to bring a screen.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:Lucky Peach and Archaeology by guises · · Score: 1

      Thank you, that was exactly what I was looking for. I'd never heard of these before and suddenly I feel like I've been missing out.

  37. A different perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As I get older, font sizes seem to get smaller (I'm already planning to get a new pair of glasses with a higher magnification on the progressive part). So I am very happy to use my tablet to read books and magazines because I can change the font size to something suitable for my inner Magoo.

    Case in point: this year's spring issue of 2600 will be the last hard copy version I buy - I can hardly read the tiny type. Hereafter, I'll be buying the electronic version.

  38. The Economist is British . . . by Mr_Wisenheimer · · Score: 3, Informative

    . . . the last time I checked, the Economist was not a US publication. Does the BBC World News have a, "US centric perspective," too?

    1. Re:The Economist is British . . . by blahplusplus · · Score: 0

      . . . the last time I checked, the Economist was not a US publication. Does the BBC World News have a, "US centric perspective," too?

      Yes.

      (from citigroup memo download below)

      http://pissedoffwoman.files.wo...
      http://pissedoffwoman.files.wo...
      http://pissedoffwoman.files.wo...

      At the beginning of the first memo "Plutonomy: Buying Luxury, Explaining Global Imbalances", the analysts introduce the subject:

      Little of this note should tally with conventional thinking. Indeed, traditional thinking is likely to have issues with most of it. We will posit that:

      1) the world is dividing into two blocs - the plutonomies, where economic growth is powered by and largely consumed by the wealthy few, and the rest.

      Plutonomies have occurred before in sixteenth century Spain, in seventeenth century Holland, the Gilded Age and the Roaring Twenties in the U.S. What are the common drivers of Plutonomy?

      Disruptive technology-driven productivity gains, creative financial innovation, capitalist- friendly cooperative governments, an international dimension of immigrants and overseas conquests invigorating wealth creation, the rule of law, and patenting inventions. Often these wealth waves involve great complexity, exploited best by the rich and educated of the time.

      2) We project that the plutonomies (the U.S., UK, and Canada) will likely see even more income inequality, disproportionately feeding off a further rise in the profit share in their economies, capitalist-friendly governments, more technology-driven productivity, and globalization.

      Citigroup explains how the "non-rich" consumers become increasingly irrelevant within the "plutonomies":

      4) In a plutonomy there is no such animal as “the U.S. consumer” or “the UK consumer”, or indeed the “Russian consumer”. There are rich consumers, few in
      number, but disproportionate in the gigantic slice of income and consumption they take.

      There are the rest, the “non-rich”, the multitudinous many, but only accounting for surprisingly small bites of the national pie. Consensus analyses that do not tease out the profound impact of the plutonomy on spending power, debt loads, savings rates (and hence current account deficits), oil price impacts etc, i.e., focus on the “average”consumer are flawed from the start. It is easy to drown in a lake with an average depth of 4 feet, if one steps into its deeper extremes. Since consumption accounts for 65% of the world economy, and consumer staples and discretionary sectors for 19.8% of the MSCI AC World Index, understanding how the plutonomy impacts consumption is key for equity market participants.

      The analysts of Citigroup then invent a new term - "The New Managerial Aristocracy":

      THE UNITED STATES PLUTONOMY - THE GILDED AGE, THE ROARING TWENTIES, AND THE NEW MANAGERIAL ARISTOCRACY

      Let’s dive into some of the details. As Figure 1 shows the top 1% of households in the U.S., (about 1 million households) accounted for about 20% of overall U.S. income in 2000, slightly smaller than the share of income of the bottom 60% of households put together. That’s about 1 million households compared with 60 million households, both with similar slices of the income pie!

      Clearly, the analysis of the top 1% of U.S. households is paramount. The usual analysis of the “average” U.S. consumer is flawed from the start. To continue with the U.S., the top 1% of households also account for 33% of net worth, greater than the bottom 90% of households put together. It gets better(or worse, depe

    2. Re:The Economist is British . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Economist is a *lot* more US-normative than most UK publications, yes. For one thing, a lot of their market is US; for another, they're generally proponents of the US and UK becoming more similar -- mostly by the UK changing.

    3. Re:The Economist is British . . . by dkf · · Score: 1

      The Economist is a *lot* more US-normative than most UK publications, yes. For one thing, a lot of their market is US; for another, they're generally proponents of the US and UK becoming more similar -- mostly by the UK changing.

      Having bought the Economist in various places around the world, you should be aware that the apparent focus of the magazine is different in different places. The content is formally the same, the articles are identical, but the ordering is not; this changes surprisingly strongly how one feels it is centric towards one place or another. Always buy in the US? It will be US centric. It's quite different in France.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  39. Print media? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean, like, the "Print" command in my programs?

  40. Here're just a few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foreign Affairs, Harper's, NY Review of Books, Lapham's Quarterly, Washington Monthly, Democracy Journal, The Baffler, and many, many more!

  41. The Library Still Has Books by warren.oates · · Score: 2

    I still take home books from our local small-town library (it's an original Carnegie Library) and read them in the bathtub and on the toilet and in bed and with The Simpsons on mute in our living room.

    --
    Doh.
  42. High Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High Times is still available in print, bro. What more do you need?

  43. our local Sunday newspaper has coupons by turkeydance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it pays for itself with the first delivery. saved $8 this week. but i blew it all of it on a flash drive.

  44. The Jamaica Gleaner print edition by colenski · · Score: 2

    The Jamaica Gleaner has excellent writing, actually employs professional reporters and fact checkers, and keeps an NPOV. The problem is, it only covers Jamaica.

  45. National Geographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Definitely National Geographic....Though I think the iOS digital edition is superior to the actual magazine. Higher res photos, updated content, and more engaging interactivity in the articles.

  46. New Yorker by timeOday · · Score: 2

    There's a digital edition too, but I presume that doesn't exclude the print edition, or your list will be empty.

  47. IT Is Not Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I swore off of magazines simply due to prices. In 1985 I spent about $35. per week on magazines to satisfy my interests. Today I can go an entire year without buying a magazine. And as for books Project Gutenberg pretty much handles 100% of my book needs as well. Frankly i find that the use of English has declined in quality to the point that I rarely want to read books published after 1930 and the savings are substantial as well. I am aware that I could drive to a library but there again is the expense of driving compared to the ease of downloading literature on a PC.

  48. worth reading by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    QST, Nuts & Volts, Air & Space, maybe Circuit Cellar, although CC seems to be changing and not necessarily for the better.

    Arizona Highways has, very sadly, fallen from a great height. I couldn't recommend it to new readers.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    1. Re:worth reading by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      I forgot one: Quest is an excellent magazine devoted to the history of spaceflight. Highly recommended.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  49. National Geographic by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

    Excellent, sometimes stunning, photography. Thought-provoking, impartial and balanced writing that prompts you to ask questions instead of telling you what to think.

  50. Here are a few by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2

    The Economist
    Harper's Magazine
    The Atlantic
    Lapham's Quarterly
    Foreign Affairs

  51. Funny Times by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    http://www.funnytimes.com/

    They're sometimes too far radically left leaning but still lots of good stuff. At least they're funny (most of the) times. :)

  52. Here is my current list: by boogahboogah · · Score: 2

    Here is my current list:

    Analog
    The New Yorker
    American Rifleman
    Shotgun News
    Practical Sailor
    Cruising World
    Good Old Boat

    Shortest of these subscriptions ? 7 years
    Longest ? 25 years (Analog)
    Do they have websites ? Sure, but the print media is what I seriously read.

    1. Re:Here is my current list: by boogahboogah · · Score: 1

      I forgot the two newspapers:

      Wall Street Journal
      Philadelphia Inquirer

  53. Subscription worth having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American Rifleman

  54. The New Yorker? by bshell · · Score: 2

    The New Yorker website is quite good, but many of their articles can only be found in the real print magazine. They don't appear online. Plus, there's something *better* about the print version of the New Yorker with its classic very readable three column layout, its well designed typeface, inimitable New Yorker cartoons sprinkled about each issue, and even the tiny little illustrations that dot the articles and follow some clever theme in each issue. I know there's an iPad/Tablet version of the New Yorker (which I have never read) but the print magazine is still pretty nice. And I have not even mentioned the expensive ads.

    1. Re:The New Yorker? by mako1138 · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I would find it hard to give up the print edition. A physical subscription includes access to the digital archive, which is nice.

    2. Re:The New Yorker? by a11ikat · · Score: 1

      Neck and neck with the Economist.

  55. Aviation Week & Space Technology by guzzirider · · Score: 1

    It is a good read, calling it a bit hawkish might be lenient.

    1. Re:Aviation Week & Space Technology by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Takes me back... from the mid-80s to the early 90s I read almost every page. Haven't seen one lately, didn't know it was still in print.

  56. Fortean Times by bshell · · Score: 1

    Check out the Fortean Times. "The world of strange phenomena"

  57. 2600 hacker's quarterly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is 2600 Hacker's Quarterly still printing? Is it still worth getting?

    1. Re:2600 hacker's quarterly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is 2600 Hacker's Quarterly still printing? Is it still worth getting?

      I believe it is, but it never was worth paying to read it. Last time I actually read some article in that publication, it was low level, you got to be kidding me, why did you want to mess with that, kind of disbelief. Building a Freaking box is not going to help you these days...

  58. Toto Washlet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    why let poor quality cellulosic products touch your tender nethermost region

    http://www.totousa.com/Washlet/S300eS350e.aspx

  59. The Economist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Economist

  60. Easy by motorhead · · Score: 0

    Soldier of Fortune
    See what's happening in the world.

    --
    Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
  61. Harper's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harper's is well worth the subscription cost. Interesting articles, both short and long.

  62. Sciencenews and the Economist. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Science News, and the Economist are the two subscriptions I always renew. https://www.sciencenews.org/ https://www.economist.com/

  63. Download the pdf of any magazine instantly by bshell · · Score: 1

    One thing I've noticed is that any print magazine you may want can be downloaded from your favourite torrent site in just a few seconds. e.g. here are the latest issues of some popular ones... http://kickass.to/national-geo... http://kickass.to/the-economis... http://kickass.to/scientific-a... and of course http://kickass.to/penthouse-us... These are pdf files of only a few tens of megabytes and with hundreds sharing new issues hot off the press, they appear almost instantly on your computer. With this going on, who would buy a paper magazine? NB: these are page for page exact copies of the real print magazine so all the ads are intact. I even wonder if magazine companies are uploading their own publications to sell more ad space based on how many torrented mags are shared. If I was in the magazine business I would do this for sure.

  64. Vanity Fair by dave562 · · Score: 1

    They have good, in depth coverage of current topics. For example, they were one of the first mainstream publications to give accurate, factual coverage of the financial crisis while it was unfolding. Their contributors write well and their editors are top notch. There are usually one to two articles worth reading every month, each about five pages.

  65. The Age by Lips · · Score: 1

    In Australia, "The Age", is an excellent centrist newspaper. My subscription is worth it!

  66. Linux Voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Great Mag on Linux

    1. Re:Linux Voice by gigne · · Score: 1

      yes. quite superb and a metrix shitload of content.

      --
      Signature v3.0, now with 42% less memory usage.
  67. Smithsonian by TheRealSteveDallas · · Score: 1

    It's always got good stuff and lasts two visits to the throne room.

  68. QST and QEX by CQDX · · Score: 1

    QST comes with membership in the ARRL but can also be found in some radio and electronics stores. QEX cost extra but is worth it if you are really deep into building your own stuff. Nuts and Volts is pretty good too. There are electronic versions of these three but I'll only pay for the printed version. If they go electronic only I won't renew my subscription.

  69. IEEE Spectrum, much more than electronics by erice · · Score: 1

    It covers a wide variety of technical topics with quite a bit of depth. I get it by default by being an IEEE member. However, it seems that you can subscribe directly too.

    1. Re:IEEE Spectrum, much more than electronics by necro81 · · Score: 1

      I used to receive Spectrum until I determined that my IEEE membership wasn't doing me much good. Thankfully, all of Spectrum's content is available on their website. It's not the same as a print magazine, but I still check it out.

  70. I care some and think there's a solution by bgfay · · Score: 1

    Our local Syracuse paper was bought up by the same folks who are running the Times-Picayune into the ground. We used to have two daily papers (certainly don't need that now), but are left with a non-daily paper that is primarily AP wire and NY Times stories.

    What I would like is to see Syracuse University buy the paper, use the press to print a daily for both the university and the city (keeping with the Town & Gown movement). The paper could be the Journalism department and also be an outlet for the business department. It seems a win-win. I wonder what the downsides are.

    --
    Yeah, I'm as old as my UID would suggest.
  71. channel differences by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    right, there are "differences" because, inherently, the channel is different, but it doesn't affect the content...journalism is still journalism

    there are myriad benefits to using the internet in the newsroom...the CMS's they have are great...very streamlined.

    digital media, as you point out, is different by scale...the resources it takes to print 100,000 newspapers is much different than the resources to make an internet article that 100,000 people see

    there are other obvious differences, and they matter to things like ad sales

    this in no way proves TFA right or lets newspaper owners off the hook for their bad business decisions

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  72. blame businesspeople by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    the Internet broke the culture of willingness to pay for journalism

    Right effect wrong cause...blame the business side. I saw this happen firsthand as a web editor in Colorado, but it's not "the internet" that broke...it was narrow-minded business people in the administration that refused to adapt their concept of ad revenue

    It's a narrow, non-tech MBA-style business approach that did this

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  73. Mad Magazine by warewolfsmith · · Score: 2

    A little crazy is a good thing.

  74. Country magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A skinny mag published by a travel agency that appeals to the AARP crowd. Nice, nonpolitical stories about middle America with wonderful, NatGeo level photography. Stories mostly reader submitted. Cheap, about $1.25 an issue.

  75. I loved the ads by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why is it that the ads in mags like Byte were a key part of the reason I bought the magazine -- but banners and online ads have become little more than annoyance and irritation?

    The old print-media ads were informative and didn't slow down my reading in anyway so I guess they were excellent "secondary" content.

    There's no way I'll patronize any site that uses full-page interstitial advertising -- yet the full-page ads in Byte and other printed mags were things I often read from start to finish.

    Is it just me or have others had the same experience?

    1. Re:I loved the ads by jbolden · · Score: 1

      A full page in a print magazine had to get you far enough through the sales process that you would remember the product and be willing to talk to a sales person. A banner ad has to get you interested enough to click on the banner to go the site. The proper comparison is the website to the ad.

    2. Re:I loved the ads by unitron · · Score: 1

      Why is it that the ads in mags like Byte were a key part of the reason I bought the magazine...

      Wasn't that pretty much the only reason to buy Computer Shopper?

      (well, except for the Lab of Doom and Pepsi-Cola)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    3. Re:I loved the ads by fulldecent · · Score: 1

      > Why is it that the ads in mags like Byte were a key part of the reason I bought the magazine -- but banners and online ads have become little more than annoyance and irritation?

      This is the same reason some Superbowl TV ads are funny but all other TV ads are boring -- they require a large up-front investment.

      --

      -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    4. Re:I loved the ads by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      That might have been true when Byte was around. The last time I looked at a print mag (don't remember what one), it had about 100 pages of pure ads. You could collect all the scattered stories and cram them on a single page.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  76. The Guardian Weekly by tick-tock-atona · · Score: 3, Informative

    You know, the organisation that worked with Snowden to reveal government overreach to the world? The one whose journalists just won a Pulitzer?

    The weekly edition is delivered worldwide. The condensed format is great for catching up on what's happening beyond the boundaries of Murdouche's empire..

    This kinda sounds like an advertisement, but it's really not. It's just that print news media here in Australia ranges from mediocre to outright political propaganda. The Guardian is my lifeline on sanity in this environment.

    1. Re:The Guardian Weekly by ErnyCowan · · Score: 1

      The Guardian Weekly is the only newspaper I read regualarly, and almost completely. I have done for about 20 years. I find it unequalled in breadth of coverage, geographically, politically, economicall, environmentally. It covers many places and issues that fall off the radar of other sound-byte oriented media. And it's courageous - Edward Snowden's revelations, the Rupert Murdoch cell phone hacking scandal, the British MP financial abuse, ...

  77. The Atlantic Monthly by davecb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Published "As We May Think" soon after WWII, today is "web first" and quite timely. Perhaps a bit fluffier than it once was, but still doesn't care what you think, but cares desperately that you do think.

    --
    davecb@spamcop.net
  78. The Economist. Still worth reading. by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    Agreed

    Falcon Wolf

  79. Heavy Metal and others by bobaferret · · Score: 1

    And any other graphic novel/ comic book like thing out there. There's some flow to graphic novels that I've never really seen done well on a computer.

    I think Photography magazines are still better in print that digital. What the picture looks like printed out is always different than what it looks like in a digital format.

    I'd also suggest Mad Magazine. You just can't fold a tablet the same way you can the back page.

  80. Harpers, New Yorker, Sunset. Not the Economist by cshay · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All of those are a pleasure to read.

    I knew some people would call out the Economist, and I used to subscribe to it some years back - but unfortunately they dumbed it down quite a bit several years ago in a push to increase their subscription base... and it looks like they succeeded.

  81. Le Monde Diplomatique by manu0601 · · Score: 1
  82. Newscientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like that one and still get it delivered

  83. Scientific American by DogDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yup. Scientific American.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Scientific American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...back when they had C.L. Stong's Amateur Scientist collum. Has gotten a bit gloom-and-doom, less technical, and frankly a bit dumbed-down. I still buy copies from time to time, but I used to subscribe.

  84. Byte served its purpose well. by falconwolf · · Score: 2

    Long live Byte. Goodbye, Byte, Circuit Cellar, Pournelle, and so many other characters. Long live Ars Technica, Wired, GigaOm, and dozens of other sites like NetworkWorld, InfoWorld, The Register, and so forth. Print will never come back. You won't feel it in your hands until your foldable smartphone makes this comfy some day in the future-- to do again.

    I loved reading Byte! starting from the beginning. Reading what hardware and software hackers, who followed hacker ethics not the criminals called hackers in the press today, were doing was terrific. My two favorite columns were Steve Ciarcia's Circuit Cellar, which is now a compleat magazine of it's own, and Jerry Pournelle's Chaos Manor.

    Falcon Wolf

  85. Harper’s, The Baffler, The Believer by LMariachi · · Score: 2

    Harper’s (not to be confused with Harper’s Bazaar, which is an especially boring fashion magazine,) The Believer, and The Baffler all have good literary and art coverage as well as long-form lefty political journalism. The New Yorker is good too, and not as New York City centric as you might think, aside from the theater/music/event listings, but it’s weekly, so kinda expensive and easy to fall behind on. There’s some good stuff in Rolling Stone and Playboy from time to time but I wouldn’t keep either one on the coffee table where people could see them.

    1. Re:Harper’s, The Baffler, The Believer by hjf · · Score: 1

      I read the Argentinian edition of Rolling Stone. Such a shame. Some of the articles are excellent, but the rest of the magazine is pure crap, especially the provocative covers (which they, at least, recognize it's for selling more)

  86. The Economist by falconwolf · · Score: 1

    You won't get the US centric perspective that you get from the economist.

    I am an American and only 2 American print magazines come as close as The Economist does to my pov. Those are Reason magazine and Liberty magazine.

    Falcon Wolf

  87. The economist, New scientist by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

    The Economist has many short articles that make for awesome bathroom reading, plus longer in depth articles. The same with the New Scientist. Both are also weekly magazines so it is a non stop firehose of up to date information that doesn't involve, cyrus, the kardashians, or whats his bieber.

    I once loved Scientific American but then they became as crappy and unrealistic as Popular Mechanics for a number of years, then they became more serious but way too much psychology 101 crap about the brain. It is Scientific American mind this Scientific american mind that. But that is just PopMechanics again about the brain. Brain Implants in 10 YEARS!!!! Brain mapped for 800th time in PET scanner! Brain simulated in even bigger computer! Basically these are cover story articles that might get 100 words in New Scientist.

    1. Re:The economist, New scientist by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      At first I read not "cyrus" but Cypress, and I thought, actually it does feature Cypress frequently...

      Still like SciAm sometimes but I have to agree—they seem to be trying to compete with Discover.

    2. Re:The economist, New scientist by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I meant Cyprus. Thought they might mention Cypress too.

    3. Re:The economist, New scientist by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      I too have trouble wiping on my keyboard at 2am. Then stupid spell check doesn't give me any heads up. I need a smell check that also checks for my intent.

  88. The Week by naff89 · · Score: 2

    I love The Week. It's a reasonably objective collection of the best news articles/opinions each week. Each Sunday, I sit down with a cup of coffee for a half hour and get a broad overview of what happened in the world that week, and what people said about it.

    It's basically a printed new aggregator, showing only the most insightful and informative opinions (from all sides) each week -- the exact opposite of the Internet news I consume daily.

  89. Hunka Hunka Burnin' Byte by govett · · Score: 1

    I remember when Byte was 600+ pages, and could break a nerd's arm when it was picked up.

    1. Re:Hunka Hunka Burnin' Byte by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      They were fat, but I must've missed that issue. Sure it wasn't a Computer Shopper?

  90. Ever switched to the other NRA mags? by swb · · Score: 1

    American Rifleman is fairly entertaining for a bathroom read. I know you can (or at least as a life member, I can..) get one of other NRA mags instead of AR. I keep thinking the women's version might be interesting, at least as a sociological amusement, and perhaps something to leave at the Pediatrician's office to keep 'em guessing.

    1. Re:Ever switched to the other NRA mags? by boogahboogah · · Score: 1

      No, because I grew up reading my dad's American Rifleman's. Still remember the WWII surplus rifles advertised for 25$ or some such. Yeah when I signed up last August I had a choice of three different mags.

  91. Neil was a Randroid.... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

    at least at one point in his life. Check the credits on 2112.

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  92. Here's a few I like by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1

    The London Review of Books
    The New York Review of Books
    Foreign Affairs
    The Times Literary Supplement

    1. Re:Here's a few I like by ignavusinfo · · Score: 1

      Finally! The LRB is woefully underrepresented in this thread. Although UK centric -- to some degree -- its coverage of economics and the Middle East is really excellent and informative for a US reader too. (Plus, of course, the book reviews.) Perhaps a little stuck in its ways but always interesting.

  93. Science News, Smithsonian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a lad of 19 and a college co-op at IBM, I discovered a wonderful periodical in the site library called "Science News." Have been a subscriber ever since (three decades). The quality of writing has not wavered.

    Have also been a member of the Smithsonian for nearly as many years. As with SN, I read cover-to-cover. I'm not always immediately interested in the subject matter, but the level of writing always draws me in. Each article always teaches me something new.

    And, by god, in either publication in 30 years, I think I have noticed only one typo. I know copy editing isn't glamorous, but it gives such enormous pleasure to read without stumbling over grammar or word-choice mistakes.

    Both are well worth the subscription price.

    1. Re:Science News, Smithsonian by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      I've always liked Science News, but it's just what it says, News. I prefer the in-depth stuff from American Scientist. Sort of like the difference between the first years of PC Magazine and the first years of Byte. I wouldn't have missed John Dvorak's Inside Track, but I didn't really learn anything long-term useful from it besides an attitude (thanks John!). I occasionally still pull out a 1980 or so article from Byte to help in understanding something.

  94. Economist, Sky and Telescope, Skeptic by edremy · · Score: 1

    The former because it's probably the best general news periodical around, even when you disagree with their (fully acknowledged) slant. S&T is nice for the photos and paper charts- my son still has the four page foldout detail of the Milky Way up on his wall. Skeptic just for the off-the wall stuff- it's a good snack time at the table read.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  95. Slashdot Magazine by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I love Slashdot Magazine. Trolling feels so much more real and important in physical print! It's crisp, solid, and biting.

    And nothing like the actual smell of dupes in the morning. Ahhh, takes the breath away. Just not the same on the 'net, dude.

  96. Byte - RIP by BobandMax · · Score: 1

    I subscribed to Byte when discharged from the Navy in 1977 and maintained the subscription until the day it was killed. They offered to transfer my subscription balance to one of their other publications. None of them interested me because they weren't Byte. A huge hole was left in computer technology reporting that was never filled. Dr. Dobbs persists, at least digitally. For that, we should be grateful.

    --

    "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
    -- Pablo Picasso
  97. Silicon Chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Electronics, both digital and analogue, a smattering of internet stuff, reviews of gadgets, 'nuff said.

    1. Re:Silicon Chip by Circlotron · · Score: 1

      Yeah,I get Silicon Chip in my letterbox every month. A good hands-on magazine for people who like to make electronic stuff. And not just lame flashing lights either. Get a load of these past projects -> http://www.siliconchip.com.au/...

  98. Few Asian magazines... by bayankaran · · Score: 2

    Internet is yet to obliterate Asian - especially Indian -magazines.
    Caravan - http://www.caravanmagazine.in/
    Open - http://www.openthemagazine.com...
    The above two are new ventures, here are some older ones...
    India Today - http://indiatoday.intoday.in/
    Frontline - http://www.frontline.in/
    And no one has mentioned New Yorker - probably the best over the years.

    --
    Tat Tvam Asi
    1. Re:Few Asian magazines... by bill_tvm · · Score: 1

      You missed out 'Seminar' - http://www.india-seminar.com/

  99. WIRED use to be great.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wired used to be a great magazine. I subscribed about 6 months ago and it is total crap now. It is unreadable.

  100. Private Eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UK magazine that soberly documents dishonest and two-faced behaviour of, mainly, the rich and powerful. Many have threatened to sue, few have done so successfully.

  101. No one mentionned 2600? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another one is "Le canard enchaine", for the french-speaking.

  102. Yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harper's and Lapham's are really amazing. I'd recommend them for anyone who likes thinking broadly.

  103. AIR by Strider- · · Score: 1

    The Annals of Improbable Research is quite reasonably priced, and a good read.

    After all, where else could you read about "Homosexual Necrophilia in the Mallard Duck" or "Predicting when cows will lie down"?

    --
    ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
  104. WRONG. Byte ~= Arthur C. Clarke, Make ~=JK Rowling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're insane, or you've never read Make, or Byte. For Byte to devolve into Make would... well look, TFA conveniently has PDFs of Byte. Read an issue of each, any issue, cover to cover; In each, skip all ads, no matter how kitsch, retro, or flashy. Byte will take you an hour or two, depending on your reading speed. Make might take you half an hour, if it takes you a few minutes to find the continuation of an article break or you need to use the washroom. Then try to bring to mind what a couple of Byte articles discussed, and the implications, and the same for Make, and note how the latter reads like JK Rowling to the former's Arthur C. Clarke.

  105. Magazines calculated to drive you MAD by damnbunni · · Score: 2

    I still read Mad Magazine.

    It's changed some since I first discovered it (and guffawed at it) decades ago, but it still has some pretty good writing and I get enough chuckles out of it to justify the sub.

    The problem with Mad is that Mad will never be as funny as it was when you first discovered it - and it doesn't matter when that was. To me the funniest Mad articles are from the '80s. My Dad read it in the '60s, and thinks those are the best years. I have the whole run on DVD, and the '60s stuff doesn't strike me as funny as the '80s stuff.

    The other problem with Mad is that pop culture has become self-parodying, which makes the parodist's job much more difficult.

    (Mad isn't a news publication. But the question didn't specify that the periodicals be USEFUL, just worth reading!)

  106. The only one I actually care about by Chi-RAV · · Score: 1

    Edge Magazine (http://www.edge-online.com/magazine/)
    A british gaming industry mag. More about the background, technicalities etc. of gaming.
    I still remember they carried a monthly section (in the '90s) where readers could showcase their own 3D modelling skills. Also it had the largest section of gaming vacancies in the UK back then. Joints like RARE and EIDOS posted jobs there.. That should tell you enough about their readership :)

  107. Re:The Economist ... and the FT by petes_PoV · · Score: 2
    If you're citing The Economist, I'd suggest adding the Financial Times - for a lot of the same reasons.

    Any newspaper that doesn NOT carry a horoscope and limits sports coverage to a single page (2, tops) must have a sensible set of priorities. In addition it takes the reaslistic view that pretty much everything of importance has a business or financial driver or consequence (though it does cover natural disasters and upheaval in non-financial terms, usually with a much more level-headed and unsensationalised tone, too).

    The weekend FT, especially, is the closest I've ever seen to a well-balanced, non-partisan, grown-up (more in-context F-words and nudity than any other newspaper manages, but it all fits in with the mature nature of the writing) content than you'll find elsewhere.

    And full-sized newspapers are so much better than tiny little tablets or even PC screens for getting the BIG picture

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  108. Not necessarily scientific by Noam.of.Doom · · Score: 1

    But the Free Inquiry and the Skeptical Inquirer are well worth reading and supporting IMO.

    --
    It is the universe that makes fun of us all.
  109. But, alas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... it supports the Climate Change scam...

    (though I see it's trying to pretend it doesn't at present)

  110. I get my news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... direct from the short-wave espionage 'number stations' http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numbers_station

    Anything else is SO out-of-date...

  111. Roundel by drama · · Score: 1

    This one is BMW specific (with a bit of Mini in there too). Subscription is via membership in the BMW Car Club of America.

    The magazine is surprisingly good. Far better than any Car & Driver or Motor Trend, etc. The difference is huge. From what I understand, of the car clubs that produce their own publications, Roundel is far and away the best. I haven't verified this myself.

  112. The Home Shop Machinist and ... by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

    Machinist Workshop

    Strategy & Tactics, Modern War, World at War

    History Today

    And with D&D Next if they don't bring back the print versions of Dragon and Dungeon I won't be held responsible for my actions ...

    --
    Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  113. Guitarist Magazine by mrandmrshappy98 · · Score: 1

    Guitarist Magazine. Yeah, they do an online version but the mag is much preferable.

  114. American Iron by NandGate1 · · Score: 1

    If you can't be out riding your motorcycle, at least you can enjoy reading about them.

  115. Scientific American by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    Dense enough (for me anyways) to take my mind off my hind brain hate/fear of flying.

  116. Foreign Affairs, Scientific American by tigersha · · Score: 1

    But both are too expensive to deliver to Germany so I have a digital subscription :(

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  117. hackermonthly by fireant254 · · Score: 1

    try http://hackermonthly.com/ there is printed and pdf option

  118. German Computer Magazines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    c't and iX. They are consistently outstanding and full of information you cannot find on the Internet (yet resp. back then). Their tests are actual tests. They often find errors in products and they get back to the manufacturer to get them confirmed and/or fixed. Or not if the manufacturer cannot or does not fix it. This is better than 98% of all "tests" of products which are often not much more than a quick check or even worse, a re-phrasing of press-releases of products.

    If you can read German, those are the only paper computer magazines.

  119. I did not abandon print, print abandoned me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I loved the old C/C++ Report, Dr. Dobbs, and other magazines. Then one day they were gone. Today, even the few print magazines like MSDN aren't on the magazine rack any longer. Did magazine buyers stop buying these technical journals? I never did. They just disappeared.

    I like to TAKE A BREAK from the computer screen, and do something else. I don't want to look at a screen all day working, and then read magazines on a screen.

    At least Dover still prints math books.

  120. American Scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    American Scientist by Sigma Xi.
    A science magazine written by ACTUAL scientist.

    (Don't confuse it with Scientific American -- totaly different magazine)

  121. Mental Floss by butalearner · · Score: 1

    My library has a digital subscription to Mental Floss magazine, which I check out every time I remember it (I'm doing so now, thanks for reminding me). The best part about newspapers and magazines (analog or digital) is that, when I pick them up, I read stories I would not otherwise seek out. Mental Floss is especially cool because of the interesting trivia represented as infographics, and their featured interviews are almost always awesome even if not very well known (two recent ones: Bill Watterson and Neil deGrasse Tyson [before Cosmos, that is]).

    1. Re:Mental Floss by DriveDog · · Score: 1

      Funny, I thought Tyson and Watterson had been very famous for a long time. But then I realized that no one else in my household knew their names until the last couple of years.

  122. worth reading, or paying for... by DriveDog · · Score: 1

    I don't actually buy much, but there are a few worth spending time with. They might be available online, but mostly just in the same format as the printed version. Not every issue for any of these, but sometimes Scientific American, American Scientist, Trains, National Geographic, Home Power, Smithsonian, Road & Track... that's about all I can think of without getting into obscure tightly-focused monthlies or geographically specific magazines. I think The Economist has stayed solvent by broadening their appeal. Which means the excellent columns with economics-based analyses of years ago are much rarer. I find The Economist not much different from some of the US-based news weeklies these days, aside from having much better international coverage.

  123. Skrolli by cosmo42 · · Score: 1

    Skrolli, a Finnish tech magazine made by hobbyists for hobbyists. The mainstream tech magazines either died or started reviewing stuff like TV's and electric shavers so hobbyist scene had to start a new magazine. It has been received really well after 5 issues in over one year. Many were skeptical that a new print magazine would make any sense but they have been proven wrong.

  124. Fine Woodworking, Popular Woodworking by ClayDowling · · Score: 1

    Woodworking is just as geeky as the computer field, just with different materials. Both of those magazines publish an excellent print edition, combined with print ads that are still relevant and generally not annoying. In both cases they have also done an excellent job of melding their print operation with the Internet. They feature relevant columnists online who can go into greater detail about subjects in the print magazine, including a lot of excellent how-to video.

  125. +1 for "As We May Think" Re:The Atlantic Monthly by Fubari · · Score: 1
    As We May Think (1945) is Brilliant, by the way - worth the read.

    r.e. main topic of "good print resources": I enjoy Scientific American, recreational reading. I don't know if I could have kept up with The Economist before it was "dumbed down" as mentioned in another post, but it is a good travel magazine for me (airport reading fare) - just not a quick read (for me). I subscribed to Wall Street Journal for a while but just didn't have time to read all of it - I found some interesting things there. I am going to try a Guardian subscription based on another recommendation.

    Here's an excerpt from As We May Think: fascinating reading, I encourage you to check it out (same link)if you haven't yet.

    Let us project this trend ahead to a logical, if not inevitable, outcome. The camera hound of the future wears on his forehead a lump a little larger than a walnut. It takes pictures 3 millimeters square, later to be projected or enlarged, which after all involves only a factor of 10 beyond present practice. The lens is of universal focus, down to any distance accommodated by the unaided eye, simply because it is of short focal length. There is a built-in photocell on the walnut such as we now have on at least one camera, which automatically adjusts exposure for a wide range of illumination.

    Also... we're not there yet on "trails".... has a fascinating section on readers researching and building their own trails; the closest I've seen is browser bookmarks. "trails" are a different thing than pre-canned trails stitched together by authors. This captures WikiPedia pretty well (in 1945!):

    Wholly new forms of encyclopedias will appear, ready made with a mesh of associative trails running through them, ready to be dropped into the memex and there amplified. The lawyer has at his touch the associated opinions and decisions of his whole experience, and of the experience of friends and authorities. The patent attorney has on call the millions of issued patents, with familiar trails to every point of his client's interest. The physician, puzzled by a patient's reactions, strikes the trail established in studying an earlier similar case, and runs rapidly through analogous case histories, with side references to the classics for the pertinent anatomy and histology. The chemist, struggling with the synthesis of an organic compound, has all the chemical literature before him in his laboratory, with trails following the analogies of compounds, and side trails to their physical and chemical behavior.

  126. Garden & Gun by NoImNotNineVolt · · Score: 1

    Garden & Gun magazine.
    Byline: Soul of the South

    Which is especially strange since I'm a socialist liberal living in an apartment in New Jersey. I first subscribed as a joke, but it turns out that this is probably the last magazine I'll stop subscribing to. Great insight into a lifestyle that isn't available to me.

    Other great periodicals that I don't see people mentioning include Wine Spectator (I don't really drink wine, or at least not any that costs more than $5/bottle), Outside magazine (I spend most of my life in a cubicle or a car), Powder magazine (skiing the east coast, the only time you see powder is in photographs).

    Perhaps my taste in magazines has more to do with escapism than anything else?

    --
    Chuuch. Preach. Tabernacle.
  127. I almost forgot: RECOIL & OFF-GRID by SocialEngineer · · Score: 1

    Both magazines are well designed and contain great bits of info if you're into that sorta thing. I highly recommend OFF-GRID, as it's got great information that's useful just in your daily life, even if you're not a survivalist.

    --
    "Better to be vulgar than non-existent" -Bev Henson
  128. Net Magazine by mr.dreadful · · Score: 1

    Net magazine is an excellent magazine about web development, which ironically has an almost unusable website.

  129. MIT Technology Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://technologyreview.com/

  130. Analog? F&SF by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Depending on your tastes.... Mother Earth News?

                    mark

  131. Nuts and Volts by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    Nuts and Volts as well as Circuit Cellar are good hardware zines. Nuts and Volts is a little lighter than CC but I like them both.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  132. USNI Proceedings by tmjva · · Score: 1

    The U.S. Naval Institute's "Proceedings" magazine.

    Yes there is an online version, but where else can you clip adverts for rail guns?

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  133. Rush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's right

  134. Rolling stone by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

    Rolling Stone for sure!

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
  135. Niche topics by Vrtigo1 · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of magazines that cover niche topics, hobbies, etc. Specifically those that target a mostly older demographic are likely to still have good content in print. I used to be into woodworking and there were still quite a few magazines specific to that topic that were worth reading. Shopnotes, Wood, Fine Woodworking, etc. They're all expanding their online content, but I don't see them going online-only anytime soon.

  136. The Old Farmer's Almanac by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

    --Still has pretty good writing, and it's fun to read the weather predictions and compare them against reality.

    Also worth mentioning - AMA (American Motorcyclist)

    Consumer Reports

    --
    .
    == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??