Slashdot Mirror


Massive Backlash Building Over Windows 10 Upgrades (fortune.com)

Some Windows users are now disabling critical updates on their systems rather than face the prospect of mistakenly upgrading to Windows 10. An anonymous reader writes: "By pushing it on users in such a heavy-handed way, Microsoft is encouraging users who have very valid reasons to stick with Windows 7/8 to perform actions that leave their machines open to attack," writes PC World's senior editor. He adds that "Over the past week, I've received more contact from readers about this issue than I have about everything else I've written over the rest of my career combined."

Now even China's official news agency is reporting that users are angry about stealthy Windows 10 upgrades, saying over 1.2 million complaints appeared on one microblogging site. It quotes a legal advisor with the Internet Society of China, who says Microsoft "has abused its dominant market position and broken the market order for fair play," saying that lawsuits would be justified over Microsoft's action. "Yang Shuo, a worker at a Beijing-based public relations company, told Xinhua that the sudden update interrupted his drafting of a business plan and led to a meeting cancellation for a deal worth 3 million yuan ($457,735). 'Just because I didn't see the pop-up reminder does not mean I agreed.'"

In a possibly-unrelated development, the Chinese military plans to send nuclear submarines into the Pacific Ocean.

280 of 501 comments (clear)

  1. Business plan = profit by gavron · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, I am writing a business plan too ,

    Dammit, I just lost $457,000!!!

    *Goes to join the MPAA and BSA to help them explain how their lost profits are calculated*

    E

    1. Re:Business plan = profit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      If the deal was cancelled because of it (it only says the meeting was, could have been rescheduled) it's probably because they couldn't believe that the guy's IT was so terrible he couldn't just move to a different computer and carry on working.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Business plan = profit by Ravaldy · · Score: 2

      Because it wasn't the fact that he was putting it together last minute and didn't save frequently (which MS Word and Excel do for you anyway).

      Ah, human nature. It's never their fault for screwing up.

      MS has become the entity to point for all failures related to computer. Getting old and redundant!

    3. Re: Business plan = profit by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Local admin revokes write and execute permisions to %systemroot%\GWX and its sub-objects from TrustedInstaller and System users.

      This prevents MS from installing or running their shit there. The updates will silently fail on install.

    4. Re: Business plan = profit by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      They are bad if they force the updates and they are bad if they don't.

      I've personally never heard this complaint until now. I have not changed the defaults and the popup will come up once in a while and can dismiss it. If I leave the computer idle for a period of time at night it will reboot which I believe is very acceptable.

  2. They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When they approved a security update installs a Windows 10 nag they all but proved there are no updates left for Windows 7 regardless of when the "end of life" is. So people cut them off.

    1. Re:They did it to themselves by Hognoxious · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is what happens when millenials and hipsters make decisions. They're incapable of understanding that someone else might see things differently to them. If they think it's a good idea, it must be a good idea, and anyone who thinks it's shit is wrong.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's about how we feel as well. We've never allowed updates to install fully automatically, but our default policy used to be that we'd normally install recommended updates unless we had a good reason not to. Not long after the Windows 10 mess started, that policy changed to install-nothing by default, and we just have someone review the security updates each patch day and make a list of any that it seems (a) we might actually need and (b) don't come bundled with anything else we don't want.

      The thing that makes me nervous, even though it's quite rational as a business decision, is that until we've had time to vet, we now don't install anything. Our assumption is that the risk of some new security vulnerability that isn't patched for a day or two and also gets past all our other precautions is lower than the risk of Microsoft shafting us with an update we really don't want.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:They did it to themselves by Megol · · Score: 1

      Bull.

    4. Re:They did it to themselves by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      "This is what happens when millenials and hipsters make decisions."

      I've never seen 'hipster' used in the same context as 'Windows' before. What's next - hipster shuffleboard?

    5. Re:They did it to themselves by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      And then the millenials and hipsters defend it, saying "microsoft needs to make a profit, so why is everyone so grumpy?"

    6. Re:They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      maybe you can clarify this mystery for me. Critical updates and reocmmended updates are two different categories. The Winodws 10 update is a recommended update, not a critical update. So if one turns off recommended updates, one does not get the Windows 10 upgrade. But the critical updates still come down fine. So how do you go from installing recommended updates AND critical updates, to not installing any updates at all? Is it just an issue of mistrust?

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    7. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      On Thursday I turned off "get recommended updates like you get important updates" (or whatever the exact text it) on my wife's computer. I *just* got a call from her telling me that her computer started installing Windows 10. I changed the setting specifically to avoid the 10 install. I double checked that my desired setting was in place after a reboot. So, no, turning off recommended updates doesn't always avoid 10.

      capthca: outrages

    8. Re:They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. Thanks for making a cogent reply to this question I've been asking since the whole business started.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    9. Re:They did it to themselves by Calydor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, that's true for everyone using Windows 10 today, so ...

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    10. Re:They did it to themselves by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      If your running Windows 7 Enterprise, that shouldn't be needed. It doesn't "qualify" for the "free upgrade" and you shouldn't ever get the screen at all.

    11. Re:They did it to themselves by Ken+D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well it started out as an Optional Update.
      Then it became a Recommended Update.
      Next it will become a Critical Update.
      And finally an Unavoidable Update.

    12. Re: They did it to themselves by macs4all · · Score: 1, Troll

      Maybe you are fucking stupid and did it wrong,or maybe you are one of the hundreds of /.ers who make shit up. Microsoft ignoring properly set policies is only one of the possibilities here.

      Catcha: dumbass

      Well, we found at least one MS shill...

    13. Re:They did it to themselves by macs4all · · Score: 1

      If your running Windows 7 Enterprise, that shouldn't be needed. It doesn't "qualify" for the "free upgrade" and you shouldn't get the screen yet

      FTFY

    14. Re:They did it to themselves by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      T Not long after the Windows 10 mess started, that policy changed to install-nothing by default, and we just have someone review the security updates each patch day and make a list of any that it seems (a) we might actually need and (b) don't come bundled with anything else we don't want.

      We had those sort of issues even back in XP+1 days - when Vista was the hot mess. Updates were always bitching something up, so meetings got interesting foro a while. Since I couldn't be in every conference room at once - especially since some of them wer my own meetings, I ended up having a couple "special laptops" that was offline most of the time, and when I did update them they were thourougly checked out.

      It's pretty pathetic when you have to keep a computer off the network in order to keep it functioning. Even more pathetic that so many Windows fans seem to think this is SOP.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    15. Re: They did it to themselves by macs4all · · Score: 1

      We really need to come up with a good name for people who accuse anyone who disagrees with them a shill.

      As soon as they stop doing it to me.

    16. Re:They did it to themselves by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Interesting

      maybe you can clarify this mystery for me.

      Today's windows updates when it damn well feels like it.

      Or even tricks you into it. I have one machine that pops up a blank window, always on top. nothing in it. when you try to get rid of it, it starts to install W10.

      Is it just an issue of mistrust?

      Is what I just described the tactics of a trustworthy company? I fear Microsoft bitching up my computer more than any malware . Though some would consider that to be redundant.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    17. Re:They did it to themselves by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's interesting. Thanks for making a cogent reply to this question I've been asking since the whole business started.

      Did you doubt the veracity of all the people who have said they "upgraded" without their input?

      Or otherwise trick you into it, in some pretty devious ways, like my blank Window that stays on top and won't go away. In the end, I have to click in the window - anywhere will do - and quickly kill the next window that pops up, because it is starting the upgrade process.. In the end, it only make sense - a company that downloads an operating system on your computer without your permission probably doesn't feel that they need your permission to do anything.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    18. Re: They did it to themselves by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      We really need to come up with a good name for people who accuse anyone who disagrees with them a shill.

      Insightful.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    19. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      It's pretty pathetic when you have to keep a computer off the network in order to keep it functioning.

      Indeed. I've done the same thing with the "special laptops" when demonstrating a new web app to someone, just in case Chrome decided to update and break it on the morning of the presentation. You can probably imagine how that habit started.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    20. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I mostly work with small businesses. These organisations are far more likely to be on Pro than Enterprise.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    21. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      So how do you go from installing recommended updates AND critical updates, to not installing any updates at all? Is it just an issue of mistrust?

      In a word, yes. We're talking about small businesses here. Some of them are generally technically clued up but too small to have dedicated IT staff, so anything to do with maintaining the IT systems is time out of someone else's day and minimizing overheads is important.

      It used to be the case that installing security updates and other things that were described as improving stability and the like generally worked, and following Microsoft's recommendations seemed to give acceptable results while keeping the systems as safe and reliable as possible.

      Since following Microsoft's advice no longer has that result, and since anything to be manually reviewed and installed takes time, a lot of the businesses I work with are now defaulting to install-nothing, and then doing the minimum sensible amount on top of that to keep things security patched as necessary.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    22. Re: They did it to themselves by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      The AC is not as much disagreeing, but suggesting that the user rather than Microsoft is be blamed in these seemingly accidental upgrades, because he is "fucking stupid" and is making shit up.

      What "good name" would you suggest?

    23. Re:They did it to themselves by NotAPK · · Score: 4, Funny

      First they came for the Optional Updates, and I did not speak out...

    24. Re:They did it to themselves by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 2

      would rather chance a malware infection than an involuntary Windows 10 upgrade

      They're the same thing aren't they?

    25. Re:They did it to themselves by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      When they approved a security update installs a Windows 10 nag they all but proved there are no updates left for Windows 7 regardless of when the "end of life" is. So people cut them off.

      I lost all trust in Microsoft with my Win7 update KB3035583. The update claimed "it made
      upgrading to Win10 easier" now seen as an inside joke at the time.

      April 11 2016 apprently I was the only person in the world who found the file that was to
      of been sent out - my hosts file had stopped it from leaving.

      This file was to of left April 5 and contained browser caches which showed what you
      done online over the course of 24 hours. All of the AV and ad blockers were in on it as it was
      allowed to pass em all.

      Mentioning this directory and warning others on sevenforums got me banned for posting
      crap.

      This was located in the GWX directory, where were three more config.cfg files. Having
      removed the GWX directory I could only read on /. what each was for when one came into
      action over the course a year.

      Windows future looked bleak with Win10 being more of a tracker/stalker (your
      choice). I went to Mint KDE, a bit more trust in that direction.

      Only now is how I felt about MS being shown by others, just took them a year to catch on.

    26. Re: They did it to themselves by cm5oom · · Score: 1

      More insightful than your comment to be honest. I was pointing out that the word shill gets thrown around a lot, especially in windows threads.

    27. Re: They did it to themselves by cm5oom · · Score: 1

      The problem is that even people who just try to counter the circle jerk bs get called shills. Even when they agree that microsoft is doing some bad stuff, just not as much as what some people claim. Hell there's probably people thinking I'm a shill and I haven't even defended windows one bit.

    28. Re:They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      No, but so far no one has answered the question except that one AC above. There is a check box in the Update settings to disable "recommended" updates. These aren't the same updates as the monthy critical IE update and all the other security updates. I have this check box unchecked on all my Win 7 hosts and there is no problem with updates or nags of any sort. This is exactly the course that Microsoft recommends, as seen in the now infamous "trick" notification. It seems a lot of people don't understand this, since they seem unable to answer my question as to whether or not they had followed this option when all their awful stuff happened. You haven't answered it either. Is there something about that explanation that is unclear?

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    29. Re:They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      Do you know of any cases where folks with the 'Give me recommended updates the same way I receive important updates' option is unchecked and the Windows 10 upgrade has been an issue? That's what Microsoft says to do, and I haven't had any problems with it. That doesn't mean everyone had the same experience, certainly, but from the news stories and jabber here it seems not many people understand this setting exists or its theoretical relationship to the upgrade.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    30. Re:They did it to themselves by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "... that policy changed to install-nothing by default, and we just have someone review the security updates each patch day and make a list of any that it seems (a) we might actually need and (b) don't come bundled with anything else we don't want."

      1. Isn't that kind of expensive?
      2. if you can't trust your supplier not to try to trick you why are you using that supplier?

      Am I the only one that finds this situation to be surreal?

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    31. Re:They did it to themselves by Megane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know what you're doing about updates you don't want, but Microsoft has "revised" the update in question at least ten times so far. Each time an update gets "revised", the hidden status goes away. If you simply "hide" updates that you don't want and leave Windows Update on automatic, one day you will wake up to Windows 10. You probably aren't doing this, but a lot of people are.

      I just gave up and turned Windows Update completely to manual-only and stopped bothering with it. But I normally don't use Windows for anything but playing a limited number of online games, and I certainly don't use IE/Edge (web browsing is done on a laptop running OS X), so my attack surface is a bit smaller than average.

      In contrast, I've seen an "Upgrade to El Capitan!" window only two or three times, and I have at least three Macs that I work with regularly. I've tried to figure out how to stop it, but it's never happened enough for me to learn anything about it. It never tries to force the update (I'm sticking with 10.9 for now), and apparently it actually respects your decision not to upgrade, instead of repeatedly nagging, downloading 6+ gigabytes without permission, and then forcing the install. Maybe Microsoft could learn something from that.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    32. Re:They did it to themselves by Megane · · Score: 1

      It started when you decided to use Chrome as your web browser? (ducking)

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    33. Re: They did it to themselves by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More insightful than your comment to be honest. I was pointing out that the word shill gets thrown around a lot, especially in windows threads.

      The Microsoft paid shill has escaped the once narrow definition, and now represents anyone who makes over the top statements in support of Windows or any OS or device. Shill might be one of the kindest words to use for these jokers. The "every problem is your fault" folks, the misinformers, the deny that Microsoft is doing what they say they are doing folks, the blatant liars. Many doing it all for free, and approaching troll and axe grinder status

      And yes - this does happen a lot in Windows threads. There is a reason for that. Shill fits pretty well.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    34. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I can't give a useful answer to that one. As far as I know, none of the organisations I'm talking about would be installing updates without approval anyway.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    35. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      1. Isn't that kind of expensive?

      Yes and no. It's annoying that someone has to spend an hour or two each month looking up the new security updates to make sure they're not doing questionable things before installing. It's a lot less expensive than having our systems compromised, whether by updating to Windows 10, installing telemetry that potentially raises regulatory or contractual compliance issues, etc.

      2. if you can't trust your supplier not to try to trick you why are you using that supplier?

      When we bought these systems, we did trust Microsoft. Now we don't, because their behaviour is no longer trustworthy. We aren't currently buying any new Windows-based systems. We are currently experimenting with other platforms. There's nothing inconsistent here, just a supplier that unfortunately changed for the worse over time.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    36. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      We've never allowed fully automated updates on any of the systems I'm talking about. The change in policy for us is that when patch day came around, we used to basically just go down the list and tick anything recommended unless we'd heard there was a problem. Now we go down the list, untick everything first, and then re-tick any security issues that appear to be relevant to us and not bundling anything we don't want after we've looked them up outside Windows Update.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    37. Re:They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      There's no need to duck, because that's exactly when it started. The catch is that it wasn't me choosing to use Chrome, it was some of our clients.

      The so-called evergreen web browsers are, in my professional opinion as a web developer, one of the worst ideas our industry has come up with in a long time, and comparable to the Windows 10 issues in terms of how much damage they cause and time they waste.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    38. Re:They did it to themselves by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Well it started out as an Optional Update.
      Then it became a Recommended Update.
      Next it will become a Critical Update.
      And finally an Unavoidable Update.

      then the Punitive Update

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    39. Re: They did it to themselves by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      We really need to come up with a good name for people who accuse anyone who disagrees with them a shill.

      In the above case, I think we can just use the term "correct".

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    40. Re: They did it to themselves by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Some days, we really need a (-1, Hopelessly Incorrect) mod.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    41. Re:They did it to themselves by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "microsoft needs to make a profit"

      Do we get to vote on this?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    42. Re:They did it to themselves by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      ...until MS decides that it is critical now that you update.

      You will know after the fact.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    43. Re:They did it to themselves by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      It's true that many people don't understand that. And Microsoft is counting on it.

      It's also true that many people, that did understand it, got "updated" anyway.

      I have turned off all updates and downloads from Microsoft, because it really is my evaluation that the "updates" are more dangerous that the "hackers".
      At least to me... YMMV.

    44. Re:They did it to themselves by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      "... that policy changed to install-nothing by default, and we just have someone review the security updates each patch day and make a list of any that it seems (a) we might actually need and (b) don't come bundled with anything else we don't want."

      1. Isn't that kind of expensive?
      2. if you can't trust your supplier not to try to trick you why are you using that supplier?

      Am I the only one that finds this situation to be surreal?

      Not the only one. But when all other companies in that industry use the same software, you might have no choice in what you use. (That may be changing now...)

      And the careful checking is done by every competent company that doesn't want to die, reguardless of system used.

    45. Re:They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much difference it makes as long as you aren't using IE for Internet browsing. The browser is really where vulnerabilities are generally targeted, most of the rest is either download a fake application or just using mechanisms already present in the OS. Those aren't necessarily patchable.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    46. Re: They did it to themselves by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      And none of those reports indicate that person understands the setting I mentioned. Just like the PC World "trick" notification story, where not only do they not know about this setting, they don't even know what a notification is.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    47. Re:They did it to themselves by cwsumner · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      See "Dancing Bunny syndrome". 8-{

    48. Re: They did it to themselves by jimtheowl · · Score: 1

      No I'm not; You are making shit up.

      I was telling you about the previous post only. That has nothing to do with what other people have said in the past.

  3. Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging site by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    If Microsoft doesn't even look at the micro blogging site, what good does complaining on it do?

    Oh, and HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate /v "DisableOSUpgrade" /t REG_DWORD /d 0x1

  4. Um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So don't call it Windows 10. Call it the largest security update ever provided.

    1. Re:Um by maugle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "hipster"
      "SJW"

      You have no idea what those terms actually mean, do you? You just heard them used in negative contexts and know people don't like being called them and, without any further research, decided to apply them to everything you don't like.
      The businesspeople complaining about this forced intrusion on their workflows are neither hipsters, nor are they SJWs.

    2. Re:Um by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      We know EXACTLY what "hipster" and "SJW" mean, so why don't you just fuck right off?

      Hey Your Majesty, watch the language! The peons are listening!

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    3. Re:Um by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      SJW means "someone I don't like". Same as "liberal".

    4. Re:Um by Z80a · · Score: 1

      You seem to have some issues recognizing SJWs, here lemme help you:
      This is how your typical SJW acts

      Except when they get powers, then expect 1984 tier bullshit.

    5. Re:Um by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Sorry, SJW means whiny millennial's or gen-xer's trying to cash in with massive amounts of whining over first world problems on microblogging sites, and screams everything is sexist, everything is homophobic, and problematic and then screams misogyny when someone tells them that their whining is shit. Key hallmarks include: Problem glasses and aposematism. Other defining features is a strong desire to ignore real world problems, screaming that free speech is problematic/dangerous/not a right and running away when someone asks why they aren't doing something actually help disadvantaged individuals.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Um by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

      It's all FUD.

    7. Re:Um by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And that long list of things you don't like is near-exhaustive, so it comes back to the answer I gave: SWJ = someone I don't like (or someone who complains about something I don't care about).

    8. Re:Um by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Sorry, facts not feels determine my reality. Maybe this handy picture will help you out.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    9. Re:Um by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The fact is, SJW as you define it is unrelated to how others use it. That you may be the only person on the world to use it "correctly" doesn't mean that the general definition of it is useful in any way.

    10. Re:Um by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      The fact is, SJW as you define it is unrelated to how others use it. That you may be the only person on the world to use it "correctly" doesn't mean that the general definition of it is useful in any way.

      No, that's not how I define it. That's how most people define it, except for those involved in social justice and are trying to reclaim the word. Which of course is falling flat on it's face. I should probably add in for future reference, SJW's also enjoy things like hashtag activism which gives them great feels, but does nothing. You can like it or not, but as a reminder SJW's made that label for themselves. Their own actions have tainted it, the normies have caught on and use the label as it should be for a group of whiny kids with no life experience and demand that the world should cater to them. Let me say that again, the reason why people use the label as such is because of their own actions.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re:Um by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. Read the last 1000 uses of SJW, and substitute "someone I don't like" for SJW and see if it changes the meaning at all. It won't. Rarely (if ever) is SJW used as you indicate.

  5. EU should act over forced upgrades via deception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    EU should act over forced upgrades via deception

    Just like they did with IE bundling, and now Google bundling.

    EU should take Microsoft to the cleaners for forcing W10 underhand

  6. In a possibly unrelated development by phizi0n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slashdot editors have been trained to cross-promote in every story rather than actually contributing their own thoughts.

    1. Re:In a possibly unrelated development by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slashdot editors have been trained to cross-promote in every story rather than actually contributing their own thoughts.

      Wow you lack humour.

  7. Retaliatory strike by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    The subs will sit off the coast of Washington, ready to fire at the next automatic update.... That's if they're not running Windows onboard.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Retaliatory strike by dysmal · · Score: 1

      The subs will sit off the coast of Washington, ready to fire at the next automatic update.... That's if they're not running Windows onboard.

      Subs with Windows! What could possibly go wrong?

    2. Re:Retaliatory strike by Tooke · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      Anybody want a peanut?
  8. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by fl_litig8r · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Oh, and HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate /v "DisableOSUpgrade" /t REG_DWORD /d 0x1"

    Silly rabbit, the next Windows critical security update will fix that registry error you just created.

  9. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately if TTIP takes hold, every consumer will get screwed by big business.

  10. Re: in other news by dugancent · · Score: 3, Informative

    First off, your off topic. This article has nothing do with Apple.

    It wrong with Apple does it and it's wrong when Microsoft does it. That said, what Microsoft is doing would be the equivalent of installing the update when you hit no/cancel in your iPad.

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
  11. Opting IN is pure BS and the world knows it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If people weren't such nancy pushovers this automatic "opting in" garbage would have been dealt with by the regulators already but I'm sure screwing common folks up the bum is business as usual for them.

  12. And at the end of all this hoopla, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Win 10 will dominate the Windows market, the world will move on, and Microsoft will consider defending and possibly losing a massive class action suit as merely a cost of business.

    What really needs to change across the board is the sizes of penalties in both civil and criminal suits against big companies. When the typical award is between 50 and 500 times what it is today, large corporations will tread more lightly. Until then, law suits, fines, etc. are just a business expense that the C-levels have already predicted and the bean counters have factored into their projections.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    1. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by ADRA · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Win 10 will dominate the Windows market"

      The real question is how much will be left with such a large market of people who generally and acutely hate your product? Every miss-step MS does (and this is certainly a big one) costs MS marketshare, and given the enemic PC landscape, that's the last thing MS needs. This will just usher people toward alternatives faster.

      Ask yourself this: If given the option would you jump into bed with Redhat or Oracle. I'd choose Redhat because Oracle's got a history of being slimy money grubbing assholes. Repuation matters, and there's little these days compelling the common man from chosing them over any of their numerous competitors.

      --
      Bye!
    2. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Win 10 will dominate the Windows market, the world will move on, and Microsoft will consider defending and possibly losing a massive class action suit as merely a cost of business.

      Presumably that is their strategy. I'm not sure it's looking so good for them so far, though. We're already most of the way through the one year period for an update to Windows 10, they have been literally giving it away and actively trying to trick people into migrating, and Windows 7 still has a much larger market share. Meanwhile, Microsoft's reputation and credibility are in tatters, probably more so with the geek and professional community than anyone else.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I think it will take time given the situation today and the need for a change in senior management, but if Microsoft doesn't come out with a better alternative before Windows 7 support runs out at the start of 2020, it is surely gifting a huge commercial opportunity to anyone who wants to make a play for their OS markets. I don't know who that would be or what form it would take, but I can immediately think of several vaguely plausible variations, and nearly four years is a long time in IT.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    4. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hello. I'm a guy who makes purchasing decisions for a business. We're not moving to Windows 10. We are looking at alternatives and about to spend real money on some of them.

      You have no evidence for your claims.

      He does now.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    5. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      large market of people who generally and acutely hate your product

      Why did you feel it necessary to drag the American Presidential election into an otherwise rational discussion?

    6. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by jenningsthecat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ... Meanwhile, Microsoft's reputation and credibility are in tatters, probably more so with the geek and professional community than anyone else.

      True. But Windows is losing share on the server side really fast, so they've probably already given that one up. Might that be why they're going all Linux-y - to pave the way for officially throwing their own server OS versions under the bus in favour of MS-branded Linux? As for the rest of the enterprise, can you see IT departments migrating their entire user base to something other than Windows? In most organizations the pain and expense of that would cause heads to roll, so anybody who wants to keep their job and/or have a good reference probably won't take the 'dump Microsoft' idea beyond the bitch and moan stage. Besides, they probably see the writing on the wall - with Cloud services pervasive and growing more so, we're likely gonna end up back at the old thin client model anyway - only this time, it will stick and become ubiquitous. Then nobody will care much about the desktop OS.

      IMHO that's why we haven't seen 'the year of the Linux desktop'. Not because Linux isn't good enough, and not because Windows isn't bad enough, but because such a large-scale change is too risky for the people who would have to promote and implement it, and in a few years it's not going to matter anyway. Maybe that's where Linux will finally have a chance - as a kickass scalable, reliable thin client OS that natively does things the same way as all those servers out there.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    7. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hate having to say it, as I've been building and supporting Windows units since Win 3.1 but for my business customers? We're looking into Chromebooks with the Windows 7 units being kept for legacy applications and to run hardware that won't work anywhere else, just like I have several XP units out there running legacy devices like CNCs.

      The reasons why are simple...they are cheap, easy to manage, and for basic office work? They have more than enough power to do the job. You can manage everything locally with Google for business and if one dies who cares? Just whip out another one from the back and they are right back where they were in a couple minutes like nothing ever happened.

      MSFT is really really fucking themselves HARD with Windows 10 as they forgot the golden rule...silly rabbit, Windows is for business. They forgot those millions of small businesses are their bread and butter and by keeping control of all their phone home shit strictly for Enterprise which most of them cannot afford? They just made the competition look a HELL of a lot more attractive. Even my gamer customers are asking me about alternative like Linux and SteamOS and just keeping a Windows partition for the games that won't run as even they really don't like Windows 10. its buggy as hell, as likely to crap itself on update as a bleeding edge Linux distro, has lousy backwards compatibility and piss poor driver support.....its just not a good OS.

      My guess is by 2020 Nutella will go the way of Ballmernator, they only question is whether there will be enough customers left who give a shit for the next guy to try to save the company. What they SHOULD have done is backported both DX12 and the Windows Store and made selling add-on services and features a big money maker, with their massive server network and bandwidth they could get ahead of the curve with services like Internet TV and selling online game hosting services but they went from being a bad Apple rip-off with Ballmer to being a bad Google rip-off with extra spying and Bing! with Nutella...sigh. How they went from making something as good as win 7 to such a giant fuckup of a company is beyond me.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Braintrust · · Score: 1

      Outside of enterprise, my opinion is that that the only reason Windows as a platform exists at all in 2016, is gaming.

      Legacy enterprise and legacy gaming keep Windows on many millions of machines, I think.

      If I could port my gaming collection completely over to Linux tomorrow without resorting to an online (Steam) solution to do so, today would be my last day having anything to do with Windows and Microsoft.

      I know Dosbox has long had Linux support, and lots of newer games are native Linux, but there's a vast grey area there that spans about 15 years of gaming, and that grey area keeps me tethered to Windows in part for the time-being.

      If you substitute the word 'enterprise' for the word 'gaming' in the previous paragraph, you also cover another huge chunk of what keeps Microsoft in business against all better judgement.

      Addendum: Apple and Google and Facebook and all the other data-mining, walled-garden monopolies are just as bad if not worse in how they conduct themselves.

      I miss the open internet a lot.

      --
      Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
    9. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by dwywit · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer to see the penalties include a refund of the cost to undo the damage:

      1. Revert Win10, or, when that doesn't work
      2. Format and re-install Win7/8/8.1
      3. Refund the cost of any hardware borked
      4. Refund the cost of software re-installation
      And most important
      5. Compensation for loss of business/income, say, actual plus 10x as a penalty and disincentive to do it again.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    10. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by dwywit · · Score: 1

      S'funny - there's an article further down about the latest release of OS/2.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    11. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by dwywit · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of Adobe Creative Suite users out there, and Adobe doesn't have much motivation to port it to GNU/Linux, although it's available on OSX - it shouldn't take much effort, but the market is just too small, at least initially.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    12. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Braintrust · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      --
      Years later, a doctor will tell me that I have an I.Q. of 48, and am what some people call "mentally retarded".
    13. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      That you, Ballmer? Don't you have a basketball team to ru(i)n?

    14. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      That is odd, because I know two very large companies are in the midst of rolling out Windows 10, as well my the company I am currently consulting for. As for gamers, well according to steam, Windows 10 passed by Windows 7/8/8.1 long ago.

      http://store.steampowered.com/...

    15. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Agripa · · Score: 1

      I think they believe that there will not be a separate desktop market so they are sacrificing what they have now to further their interests in other markets. Based on the results, it is not working.

    16. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

      In my libertarian dictatorship, wholesale liquidation of corporations for serious criminal fraud would be the norm. For a very few instances. Then no more.

    17. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Trogre · · Score: 2

      I've found old Windows XP laptops make great Linux+XFCE notebooks for my customers. Just throw a cheap SSD in them, maybe replace the battery if needed, and they're much faster than they ever were when new.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    18. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I have a few friends who also run their own businesses or are senior enough in someone else's to make IT purchasing decisions. That kind of thing happens when you've been working for a decade or two. Still, as long as all of us are only pretending to have power and our businesses are all mythical, Microsoft has nothing to worry about, right?

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    19. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      You must be looking at different Steam stats to the ones you linked to. Those show Windows 10 at around 40% market penetration, almost exactly the same as Windows 7, with 8.1 at around 12% and everything else lost in the noise.

      I'm curious to know which very large companies are already rolling out Windows 10, if you're free to name them. So far I haven't encountered any in my own work, but most of the clients I deal with are at the smaller end of the scale.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    20. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's where Linux will finally have a chance - as a kickass scalable, reliable thin client OS that natively does things the same way as all those servers out there.

      The merged product of Android and Chrome OS fits this bill pretty nicely. Chromebooks are already displacing iPads in the educational sector. Can the business sector be far behind? If Google comes out with private-cloud version of its Apps platform, then that provides another nail in Microsoft's coffin. One might argue that we're trading one oligopolist for another, but hasn't that always been the case?

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    21. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      As for the rest of the enterprise, can you see IT departments migrating their entire user base to something other than Windows?

      I already have, but then I mostly work with smaller businesses rather than big "enterprise" clients. In the smaller organisations, IME, there's generally much less tolerance for the kind of shenanigans Microsoft has been pulling lately, and often more willingness to make significant changes if the alternatives look better. I've seen things like dumping MS Office entirely (in favour of cloud-hosted equivalents) and dumping Windows almost entirely (in favour of Apple laptops) with generally positive responses.

      I suspect you're right about trending back towards thin clients, at least for the short to medium term. In a sense we have already been doing that for a few years with mobile apps as front ends to remote services, but it seems that for many businesses, web apps and cloud hosting generally have also won for now, despite the various downsides. I'm not as sure as you are that the thin client model will stick: I think those downsides will become too significant to ignore after a while and business users will look to regain control. The irony is that the one business that could potentially have led the industry on a short-cut to that end result was Microsoft, and it would probably have been huge for them, but once again they tried to follow another trend five years too late instead and now they've blown it.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    22. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Linux users are the type that, if they pay for software, would usually prefer to do so once rather than buy a cloud subscription. And they already have had the opportunity to download the backup, offline version (CS2) since Adobe posted the serials publicly.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      there were adobe tools (pshop?) for sgi irix, but that was a special case.

      irix emulation for linux, funny thought.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    24. Re:And at the end of all this hoopla, by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Businesses will continue to use microsoft so the market will continue to be dominated by microsoft. There really is no alternative for the masses as they are barely able to use windows and it has full support from hardware manufacturers. I use linux for the most part but I've been using computers since 1982 before the world of the GUI began on the desktop. I've moved several coworkers to Macs but as aircraft mechanics they make good money and can splurge on such things. Without fail all the ones that moved to Macs are overwhelmingly happy with the change but given the high costs I doubt Macs will ever be more than 10 percent of the market and Apple seems okay with that. Being a premium brand is very profitable. I used to hope for a linux desktop conquest but I think it'll remain a geek niche and I've come to accept that as well.

    25. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by inasity_rules · · Score: 1

      They also killed SBS, with the last usable option being 2011. So, there we sit, on SBS 2011 until I can port the functionality over to a linux box.

      --
      I have determined that my sig is indeterminate.
    26. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      As you apparently know, Windows 7 has support until the early 2020. That is a long time before we need to make any big decisions, and we expect the Windows 10 fiasco to be ancient history by then one way or another.

      In some cases we couldn't use the free Windows 10 update even if we did want to, because we'd have immediate compliance issues as soon as we didn't have full control of systems that handle sensitive data, which no version of Windows 10 available via the free update offers.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    27. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

      Same experience, except that the 'upgrade' to Win10 silently discards a random selection of (mostly old) programs you might well be using daily. And they almost all work if you can reinstall them. What's going on?

    28. Re: And at the end of all this hoopla, by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you mean. The stats clearly show that the #1 version of Windows installed is Windows 10 (64-bit), which is what I said -- at 40.01%. The next closest is Windows 7 (64-bit) at 34.09%, and then Windows 8.1 (64-bit) at 12.46%.

      As for which very large companies are already rolling out Windows 10, I don't think I should. I'm not sure if they care if others know or not, but I'm not wanting to find out from their legal departments that they do. I could say that one of them is one of the largest advertising agencies in the world, and other is a state government agency.

  13. It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 5, Informative

    Create a blank .reg file and put this in it

    Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\Gwx]
    "DisableGwx"=dword:00000001

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\WindowsUpdate]
    "DisableOSUpgrade"=dword:00000001

    Then run it, alternative manually add those keys to the registry yourself.

    Yes, I know this isn't exactly user friendly and NO it shouldn't be necessary but it works all the time, every time.

    It's even documented on the Microsoft website, go on have a look : https://support.microsoft.com/...

    Why this is STILL not common knowledge I don't know. All you get from everyone is bitching how "Microsoft shouldn't be doing this" and "how dare they have the gall to do this". If EVERYONE on Slashdot put some effort in to spreading the word about this pretty simple fix, then a LOT of people would not end up with Windows 10 when they don't want it.

    Hey maybe Slashdot could run a quick piece on it? Perhaps spread the word to some mainstream press with a link to a reg file hosted by someone trustworthy.

    Alternatively let's all just keep rehashing the same fucking discussions about how "update KBwhatever" keeps coming back when hiding that has never been they way to fix this problem.

    1. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      No thanks required, just share the wealth.

    2. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I saw a post elsewhere that said:

      Activists will go out and build ramps for disabled people.
      Social justice warriors will go out and remove stairs for everyone so that the disabled person won't be offended.

      I applaud your interests in practical applications of knowledge good sir!

    3. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by michael_rendier · · Score: 1

      This is because i wasn't logged in when i posted ^^^

      --
      There are three kinds of people in the world. Those that can count, and those that can't.
    4. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 2

      Thanks for your useful suggestion. It's relevance to the topic has not gone unnoticed.

    5. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      spead the news: linux is better, switch today!

      now that's wealth.

    6. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 4, Informative

      They documented the feature in January. I have been using it since at least February on 2 machines that I use 6 days at week and always have automatic updates on and scheduled to run at 3am. Neither have been automatically upgraded to Windows 10. 1 machine is left on 24/7, the other about 9/6.

      I have used it on at least 500 customers machines and in that time exactly none of them have been automatically upgraded to 10. I would know because I told every single one of them that if they found themselves on 10 to call me and I would roll them back to 7 remotely.

      As yet none of them have called me.

      So, yes, Microsoft may well edit these keys, they're not exactly in the business of being super nice to consumers are they.

      But what's the point now? The "free Windows 10" offer ends in about 2 months. They've had at least 4 months to nix the single most effective method of stopping the Windows 10 upgrade and yet they've not bothered. They just kept people busy pointlessly blocking a windows update and the forums and comments full of geeks moaning about how Microsoft keep fucking them about.

    7. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Meh, it's not the Desktop operating system Windows is though is it? Really.

      I did Linux on the desktop for a year at home and work. It's alright, stuff eventually works but I still found myself hankering for the "I didn't even need to find a driver for it" feeling of Windows.

      Yes, I've got to fuck about with registry hacks and stuff to get it the way I like it, but is any Linux distro 100% what a user wants out of the box?

      Can you grab nearly any piece of hardware made in the last 5 year, plug it in and have it just work? Can you just buy a game, install it and play it?

      How's fitting that brand new top of the line graphics card going?

      I love Debian, I run it on 6 servers and wouldn't look anywhere else for a server operating system. It does exactly what you ask of it, no more, no less.

      For the desktop though? It's just not Windows enough.

    8. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But what's the point now?

      I suppose it depends on how desperate they get as the deadline nears, particularly if they don't see a huge surge in conversions at the last minute. Even when the Get Windows 10 prompts started, I wouldn't have expected Microsoft to turn an update that installs them back on after a user actively chose to hide it. Even after they'd done that, I wouldn't have expected them to bundle promotional material into an unrelated security update. Today I don't honestly know what lines they wouldn't cross any more or if there even are any.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    9. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    10. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I don't want a solid, well supported Linux desktop.

      I want a Windows desktop. It's definitely not perfect, but at least it's not Linux on the desktop.

      I keep trying it, I always have a partition loaded up with Desktop Linux on. I regularly try out this distro or that distro.

      I always end up back in Windows, it's the path of least resistance.

    11. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, if they guy who writes a piece of software that he has to keep updating to get round Microsoft's dirty tactics says that the KB in question is re-enabling automatic upgrade to Windows 10, then who am I to argue?

      I'm just some guy on the internet.

    12. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I never said it did, but good point well made.

    13. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I'll shut the fuck up now because clearly this is a solved problem. Thanks for helping.

    14. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Can you grab nearly any piece of hardware made in the last 5 year, plug it in and have it just work?

      Kinda... In fact, I'm soaking in it

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    15. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this hack doesn't disable the nagging. It just stops automatic updates, but many users will see "important free upgrade from Microsoft, it's great honest, click here" and will manually request an upgrade anyway.

      FWIW I did try Windows 10 on a system of mine and it goes to a black screen with no cursor when booting with BitLocker enabled (works fine in 8.1). Obviously can't downgrade the normal way because it has to boot for that to work. Fortunately it was a test install on a spare drive.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      Why not just turn off recommended updates like the latest generation of notification from MS suggests? Critical security updates will still get applied.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    17. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Isao · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or download and run Never10 from Steve Gibson. Makes the approved registry changes for you, and removes any pre-downloaded installation files you may have.

    18. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see some evidence of it not stopping the nagging, again I have nothing but anecdotal evidence of it being 100% effective but if someone has actual proof of it failing then I'll stop peddling my snake oil.

    19. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Why not just apply 2 registry keys?

      If it's as simple as "Why not..." then why is anyone still suffering this problem?

      Because any mainstream news coverage this get's is 100% negative Microsoft bashing with zero advice on how to sort it out.

    20. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Whatever works for you dude, you're preaching to the wrong congregation though.

      It's not the nerds that need to know, it's all the other people that don't want Windows 10.

    21. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

    22. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      As far as I can see, people are still suffering this problem because they don't understand the directions MS keeps trying to get them to read. It seems like a lot of people don't know the difference between recommended updates and the critical updates (or "important" updates as the control panel calls them).

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    23. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      This is definitely a large part of the problem. There's not a big enough noise coming from non Microsoft related news outlets to tell people how to sort it.

      It's like geeks have discovered a cure for dirty diesel but instead of getting the word out, they're arguing about how terrible the engine manufacturers are.

    24. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      An apt car analogy!

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    25. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by fnj · · Score: 1

      I always end up back in Windows, it's the path of least resistance.

      Fine. Then you bloody well deserve the hell you are going to go through.

    26. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I'm yet to experience anything like what I would expect hell to be like.

      What hell am I going to go through? Educate me.

    27. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Huh, weird! It's almost as if Microsoft have been doing their level best for the past five years to convince users that they should conflate "critical updates" with "recommended updates"! Gee, if only we could clone you and assign all of your clones to be live-in helpers to all of the countless grandmothers, grandfathers, and other non-technical people who would be affected by this. It would be so easy!

    28. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The Never10 utility does this. Very small so easy to download.

    29. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even if they charge, they'll keep the ads. Though I suspect they may extend the free period.

    30. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They do all sorts of nonsense. Ie, when people in W8 preview discovered registry setting to skip the Metro start screen and boot straight to desktop, that removed that in the next update. It didn't hurt Microsoft, the vast majority of users would never have used it or known about it, and yet...

    31. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this disable all Windows updates, including those one might wish to install?

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    32. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      No, just the upgrade

    33. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      Okay thanks

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    34. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

      I believe he is referring to you losing control over your computer. Some people like that, some don't.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    35. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by clarkn0va · · Score: 1

      "Any OS that requires me to manually edit the registry is simply not ready for the mainstream"

      Or something like that.

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    36. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Similar experience. I've tried many linux desktops; always too much little stuff missing or too many nuisances or WTFs, and back to Windows I go. Tho if they don't succumb to wherever KDE5 is losing its marbles (please, people, not everyone wants a fucking cellphone interface!), PCLinuxOS is pretty close.

      Some years ago during one of my periodic spasms of linux testing, Mandrake 7.2 came closest to everyday usable... and when I finally got the desktop all tweaked to my satisfaction, I was amused to discover that I'd recreated Win95.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    37. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I think the real point is that Win10 isn't a desktop; it's an interface to the Windows Store. And this "Get it for free!" thing is like that furniture store that's been having its "Going out of business!" sale for the past 30 years.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    38. Re: It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      There's nothing to stop them.

    39. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by ayesnymous · · Score: 1

      Would it be a problem to run both Never10 and GWX Control Panel? Who knows, some Microsoft Windows 10 update might slip thru one of those but be caught by the other one.

    40. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Sure, but GWX Control Panel should probably be updated periodically as well.

    41. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      The last piece of hardware I had to install in a Linux box (was a media server) was a DVB-T2 TV Card.

      Not only were no drivers included with Debian for it, I had to go off and grab a firmware then COMPILE my own drivers.

    42. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      My point of shock was when it offered to sell me a version of Minesweeper that would not have ads.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    43. Re:It's THIS EASY to stop Windows 10 Upgrades. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I heard about that... and that it's something like a 100mb download, wtf. (Did they tweak Win10 so old Minesweeper won't run?)

      I first realised what Win10 really is when I heard (I don't know if it's true) that there's no media player included, but that you could buy one at the Windows Store for a couple bucks. Yeah, a couple bucks times half a billion users, that's already more money than you'd make selling a desktop to those who'd pay for it. Microsoft's real money has always been in Enterprise customers, but they've also always sought a method of making profit from home users (who previously have never been profitable)... well, this is it.

      It's the cellphone business model applied to a PC, and personally, I hate it.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  14. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by hambone142 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd like to see a nasty class action lawsuit against Microsoft in this issue. Not that I like lawyers but this is a very damaging and deceptive action on Microsoft's behalf.

  15. If only... by WegianWarrior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...this had been opt-in instead of try-repeatedly-to-opt-out, Microsoft might been able to gain lots of positive press for offering a newer, allegedly safer, somewhat spying OS for free.

    As is, with it being rammed down people's downlinks with little or no regards for the users wishes or data-caps, the angry backlash should been predicted and expected.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  16. this happens when you trick and mislead your users by pezpunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft is assaulting its user base with features and upgrades that they don't want.

    hounding, harassing, misleading, and tricking users into doing things they don't want to do is a great way to lose even more market share and foster an even more toxic reputation that Microsoft is unscrupulous and an increasing unnecessary nuisance.

    it is hilarious to me that there are actually people here who will defend MS and even blame users for their OS being upgraded against their intentions.

    when you have to watch your own system like a hawk and protect it from multiple vectors of attack ... from the company that MADE that OS ... man, it is time to re-evaluate whether it's worth the hassle at all. amazingly, Microsoft has managed to plant that seed of thought not in rabble-rousing Linux faithful, but average joes and janes who have no desire to become security experts and update ninjas just to keep their machine from changing its operating system on them. good job MS, alienating one of your most faithful demographics.

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
  17. No more security for old systems, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The support period for Windows 7 and 8 has not run out yet, so why does everyone claim that not upgrading to Windows 10 will leave open machines for attack? Does Microsoft plan to not put out any more security updates for older systems or is this fear mongering to draw more people to Windows 10?

    Both would be bad.

  18. I'm making money off it. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am installing GRC's never10 at an alarming rate. I have had to make at least $1600 in the last week alone charging $25.00 for the 10 minutes it takes to install it on their personal computers..

    Thank you once again Microsoft for making the IT guys job more relevant than ever, at this rate I'll be able to afford a vacation home by fall.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:I'm making money off it. by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Because outside of office work and servers, Linux is SHIT. Linux actually makes my hardware LESS valuable because i lose so much performance. I love Linux, been on the train since the 90s. When SteamOS came out i built 3 different machines (good, better, best based on Valve's specs). Best and Better are now Win 10 machines and Good is in a closet somewhere. Im wearing a damn TF2/Linux Tshirt right now, but for entertainment on x86, its garbage.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:I'm making money off it. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't care if I had to play retarded clones of Solitaire and the snake maze game(s). I would NOT reward M$ for DirectX and that's what people are doing by using Windows for gaming.

      If you want to play more than a handful of AAA titles, your choices are Microsoft, Microsoft again, or Sony. You know it's sad, but true. The situation is improving, but it is improving slowly. It's got four years to improve sufficiently that I don't need Windows. The only question then will be whether I'll be able to run Steam without systemd...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:I'm making money off it. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I would NOT reward M$ for DirectX

      Why not? It seems to be one of their most solid and well performing APIs.

  19. That only works until Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    adds a workaround. I did a couple of different registry tricks, but I still ended up with 10 on my 7 desktop this week without my permission.

    1. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Not the GP poster here.

      Could the difference be that your 500 machines are linked to a domain, while the GP's single machine is stand-alone?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by richy+freeway · · Score: 2

      No. I run a "mom n pop" computer shop with 3 engineers that averages about 70 repairs from the general public in a 5 day week.

      We also probably get about 10 a week from a company that gives support on machines they lease.

      We're by no means huge, but we see enough customers who have not long made the jump from XP to 7 who don't want to move to 10.

      My story is purely anecdotal and definitely not scientific. But when I see apparently knowledgeable people saying they can't keep 10 off their machines whatever they do, it makes me wonder if they have an agenda with what they're saying.

      Full disclosure : I run 10 on all my personal desktops and my desktop at work. We have a 2 Windows 7 machines left in the building. Both are running some accounting software we don't want to upgrade. (How cliched does that sound?) It works fine in 10 but you can't send PDF invoices from it via Email.

    3. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, given that it's been the officially documented way to avoid this. And it's been my experience as well with non-domain joined machines.

    4. Re: That only works until Microsoft... by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna call bullshit.

      Forget all the special tools that stop the updates coming in. Forget hiding updates.

      You have those specific keys in your registry set to those specific values and you STILL have Windows 10, through absolutely no action you or anyone who has access to your computer has taken?

      Tell me more.

    5. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      So if 3 technicians know the answer, why do all the 6 figure engineers struggle with it? Why aren't they telling more people about it?

    6. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The key registry setting will actually delete any partially downloaded Windows 10 folder if it detects it.

    7. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      My story is purely anecdotal and definitely not scientific. But when I see apparently knowledgeable people saying they can't keep 10 off their machines whatever they do, it makes me wonder if they have an agenda with what they're saying.

      If you (or lots of other non-NDA-bound people) had the source code for windows update , you wouldn't have to wonder. You could have found out yourself, or the other people who hadn't signed NDAs would have made it public knowledge why it happens in some systems and not in others.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    8. Re:That only works until Microsoft... by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification.

  20. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First off, your off topic. This article has nothing do with Apple.

    He's commenting on the heavy, biased, and relative over-reporting of the Microsoft windows 10 upgrade push issue while any one else who does it is given a free pass.

    Apple is just an example.My mom's ipad nags her to upgrade every single day. Where are the stories that apple is pushing unwanted upgrades with no way to shut them off?

    It wrong with Apple does it and it's wrong when Microsoft does it.

    Quite. But it's apparently only newsworthy when Microsoft does it?

    That said, what Microsoft is doing would be the equivalent of installing the update when you hit no/cancel in your iPad.

    Its really not.

    Suppose Adobe flash pops up and says it will complete the flash upgrade install when you reboot your PC. with a single button that says: "OK"

    Clicking the window corner close-window "X" or even hitting "Alt-F4"... only an idiot would think these actions some how would ever "Cancel" the flash upgrade next time it the computer reboots. That's not how it works, and everybody with half a brain knows that's not how it works. Expecting doing that to cancel windows 10 upgrade is just... silly. Spilling a bunch of ink over it is even sillier.

    Complain rightfully that Microsoft is being aggressive, belligerent, and ought to stop, or even be sanctioned... but there's no reason to imagine nonsense about the X button, which is doing exactly what its always done: dismiss the window. Whether or not it cancels the action... some times it does, other times it doesn't...it depends. You can't assume it's cancelled and there are countless examples where dismissing a notification window doesn't cancel...

    Here's another... If outlook pops up a window saying you have a meeting in an hour, and you click the 'x' in the corner, or alt-f4 outlook... it doesn't cancel the meeting.

    All you did was dismiss the window. Spilling ink with headlines like "clicking X on outlook notifications doesn't cancel the event! waaaaahhhh!" is just silly.

  21. Re: I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by spectrum- · · Score: 2

    I feel a bit conflicted on this one. On the one hand, you're absolutely correct - MS is pushing this to monetise the OS and use windows store platformto generate a new revenue stream to compensate for the drop in PC sales etc.

    But on the other hand Windows 10 has some stuff in it I really like. Ignoring briefly the dubious back peddling on the ux disaster that was 8 and 8.1 there's some nice stuff in there like OneGete and powershell 5 and native stuff like virtual desktops and forthcoming ssh and bash shell etc. Some stuff lifted from other platforms who but nice nonetheless.

    The real problem is it's gonna only get worse as they try and suck everything into Azure and Office 365 and a variety of other vendor lock in stuff. All looks somewhat enticing now while they love all the open source at the moment. But this can't last.

  22. Lucky me by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 4, Informative

    All my 7 installs are Enterprise, which are "not eligible" for this "free upgrade" lol.

  23. How many friggin' times do I have to say NO! by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1
    . Updategate: Microsoft reinstalls piss-U-off-qwik Windows 10 virus, again

    .
    Microsoft missed the 'no means no' portion of sex-ed class...

  24. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by QuietLagoon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...it is hilarious to me that there are actually people here who will defend MS...

    It wouldn't surprise me if there were paid shills defending Microsoft on the boards. Probably wouldn't be the first time Microsoft did something like that.

  25. Re:Then don't use Windows by umafuckit · · Score: 1

    Don't like Windows? Don't use it. Done.

    Some of us have to. I hate the thing but I work with certain hardware/software combinations for which Windows is still the only option.

  26. Funny thing is, would buy win 10 but not upgrade by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

    I would probably buy win10 on my next new computer without giving it a second thought but I'm very resistant to upgrading my win 8.1 system.

    On top of that, Microsoft's behavior is giving me a strong push towards linux for my main permanent box.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  27. Re: in other news by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Where are all these people finding iPads that nag them to update every day? We use them for testing, and I've never seen more than a message when a new version of iOS is available and then the little marker like all the other apps with available updates on the relevant screen.

    Apple certainly do some shady things in terms of trying to drive updates. They stop apps that don't favour newer iOS versions being available in the App Store. They provide no mechanism to back out of an update if it doesn't work. They should be, and sometimes actually are, criticised for these things. But I've never seen anything to suggest they harass users the way Microsoft have been recently or automatically install anything unless the user actively opts out.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  28. Ideas about Microsoft's abuse: by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wow! Many of the comments above have somewhat justified or accepted Microsoft's abuse.

    1) Can we have a court case to force Microsoft to sell everyone the Enterprise version of Windows 10?

    2) On Windows 7 and 8, turn off automatic updates and use Autopatcher. Unfortunately, Autopatcher has not begun supporting Windows 10. We need independent control over Windows operating system updates. How can we achieve that?

    3) Don't let Windows connect to the internet. Use 2 separate networks. There would need to be some way for the separate networks to communicate. Internet access could be done using separate computers running Linux.

    Microsoft has a long, long history of releasing defective code and fixing it later. After fixing 2,722 vulnerabilities and other defects, Microsoft declared Microsoft Windows XP "end of life". After fixing almost 3,000 defects, Microsoft declared Windows XP was too vulnerable to use.

    We still have 17 computers running Windows XP with a software firewall. We've had no problems. Everyone is a limited rights user.

    4) We need international support for a Windows-compatible operating system, like ReactOS.

    5) Maybe the U.S. government now only helps the rich gets richer. The European government could bring a huge court case against Microsoft.

  29. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decepti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't use m$ products, problem solved.

  30. Re:Then don't use Windows by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I guess you werent around when Microsoft was convicted of being an abusive monopoly....

    --
    Good-bye
  31. Regardless of the arguments: Thanks, Slashdot! by mschuyler · · Score: 2

    Argue away, but the fact is Slashdot warned me in time. I thought I had put Win X to bed a long time ago, but up it pops again. I killed it again, thanks to Slashdot. Don't know how long it will stay dead, but at least it is for now.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  32. Re:in other news by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The iOS control panel allows you to disable automatic downloading and installation of OS updates.

    Windows does not.

    It's really that simple.

  33. Why Not A Class Action Law Suit by bigal123 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My parents were just hit with the Windows10 upgrade. I had not bothered to block it on their computer. They are older and now more confused than ever about what happened without their permissions. Many of their saved passwords were cleared out to sites. They struggle to use Windows as it is and Microsoft does not make it easy on a normal day. I truly think that a massive class action suit against Microsoft would easily win hands down.

    The first law firm to step up and push it right could make some money. End users may not get a whole lot out of it, but it might make MS shut up and listen.

    An no I normally don't like these types of law suits and don't like most lawyers, but this clearly shows need.

    My folks were already on the verge of going to a Mac. this may push them over the edge.

    1. Re:Why Not A Class Action Law Suit by speedlaw · · Score: 1

      Buy a mac now. I'm tech support for the same overall situation. At one point I calculated the gas and time it took me to keep a rickety laptop going and I bought a used iMac for them. Best $275 I ever spent....set up the unit with my old single band Airport and now I only visit for dinner.

    2. Re:Why Not A Class Action Law Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why not a class-action?

      1) You can't. Read the EULA. No class actions; individual actions by arbitration (arbitrator chosen, or at least paid for, by MS) only, if you think you can prove some kind of specific damage.
      2) MS may have more and more expensive lawyers than the US Government, let alone anybody else who might want to try. Even if 1) didn't apply, no contest.
      3) MS doesn't really care about people leaving. The PC market is crashing anyway, and Windows is a non-presence in tablets, *books, and phones. As long as they can sell their cloud services (big, but almost a rounding error compared to Amazon, Google, etc.) to businesses, they'll be happy, until the company runs out of cash (could take a while).
      4) For most people, Linux is not an alternative. Neither is Apple, really. So one way or another Windows is here to stay, grumbling and griping notwithstanding.

      If you want to stay on W7, apply the documented and undocumented tweaks. Never10 and GWX Control Panel. Set Windows Update to ask before downloading, and uncheck Recommended Updates with Important. Hide and re-hide the W10 things (in Optional Updates) as the appear/reappear. If you can't figure it out and don't have an IT Guy on staff, outsource to a computer shop. Done.

      W10 itself can be controlled, but if done right it ends up looking and working like W7 but with a weird start menu, too much network activity (even after turning off or blocking the major hogs), slightly higher power consumption than W7 in older machines, uncontrollable updates, and rotten drivers. On the latter, a latency problem has reappeared on one older machine of mine in W10 that was fixed in W7 5 years ago - ??? Bottom line: W10 can be controlled, but it may not be worth it if you already have W7 working right, and some useful software no longer works (as is usual with new OS's). Choose wisely.

  34. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    (For whoever missed the reference and thought I was trolling: here you go.)

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  35. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a nasty class action lawsuit against Microsoft in this issue.

    And I'd like to join it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  36. Re:Grandma doesn't know how to use the registry by richy+freeway · · Score: 1

    So go tell Grandma how to do sort it out.

    Alternatively just talk about grandma on the internet and how bad Windows 10 is.

  37. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    Silly rabbit, the next Windows critical security update will fix that registry error you just created.

    I doubt that Microsoft is going to break Microsofts How to manage Windows 10 notification and upgrade options documentation.

  38. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by danomac · · Score: 4, Informative

    A few days ago I fixed a business computer. It kept nagging and finally installed Windows 10.

    The result?

    1. The upgrade finally killed the (very old) hard drive in the PC. Errors everywhere, had to be replaced.
    2. The old office suite no longer worked.
    3. The antivirus messed up.
    4. Somehow during the process the email screwed up and they lost some of it (not repairable.)
    5. The custom order entry system he used no longer ran.

    So a new hard drive was installed and Win7 put back on. Everything was reinstalled, and I put in the GPO policies and registry tweaks that stop W10 for now... until Microsoft decides to change it again.

    When I told them they'd have to probably spend $700+ replacing their old software (and still risk the order entry system not working) they were very mad at Microsoft. This was their only functioning workstation and so its lost definitely affected business operations. The computer store was backlogged over a week (!) fixing issues like this one so they called me.

  39. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    http://osxdaily.com/2016/01/04...

    Option 1: Punt the iOS Update for 24 Hours

    If you take this route, get used to pressing Later and Remind Me Later repeatedly, as in 24 hours you'll be asked about it again. And 24 hours later, again. And another 24 hours later, you can go through the process yet again, until you either give in or move along with another of the options below.

    That was option 1. The other options are even more awesome.

    Option 2: delete update and avoid wifi forever.

    This deletes the available iOS update which stops the iOS update from popping up every day, however, the moment you're on a sustained wi-fi connection for a while the iOS update will download itself again automatically and start sending pop-ups to install it again.

    Option 3: Accept the update.

    Avoid the upgrade reminders by accepting the update. yay solution!

    Option 4: Block the update domains on your firewall.

    Of course this means blocking all updates for all apple devices on the LAN... and only works while you are at home; so hardly a solution at all really.

    This is just as shite as Microsoft, if not worse.

  40. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    They should force Microsoft to include an OS choice screen, like the browser choice one. A selection of alternate operating systems, including Ubuntu, Tails and ChromeOS. There would need to be some kind of mechanism in there for processing refunds for the unused Windows licence too.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  41. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Why do you say disabling recommended updates is an extreme? I always disable them. They aren't the same as the critical security updates, they are just various driver updates, langauge packs, and the like. And the update to Windows 10. I've never had any issues with Windows 10 upgrades or nagging notifications since I've had recommended (Again, not critical) updates turned off the whole time.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  42. Sex has some parts I really like by raymorris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    > I feel a bit conflicted on this one. ... But on the other hand Windows 10 has some stuff in it I really like.

    Suppose for a moment that Windows 10 was awesome, as good as sex. And Microsoft is forcing it upon people who don't want it. How do you feel about forcing sex on someone who doesn't it? Still conflicted?

    In my case, I have expensive hardware which is controlled by a Windows application, an application which doesn't run in Windows 10. Without Windows 7 or earlier, I have to throw out several thousand dollars worth of equipment.

    1. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How do you feel about forcing sex on someone who doesn't it? Still conflicted?

      The only thing I'm conflicted about is the fact that you're comparing a free OS update with rape.

      Don't do that.

    2. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by Kickasso · · Score: 1

      > I have expensive hardware which is controlled by a Windows application

      You have made your bed, now lie in it.

    3. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      How do you feel about forcing sex on someone who doesn't it? Still conflicted?

      The only thing I'm conflicted about is the fact that you're comparing a free OS update with rape.

      Don't do that.

      Then how would you describe what Microsoft is doing?

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    4. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How do you feel about forcing sex on someone who doesn't it? Still conflicted?

      The only thing I'm conflicted about is the fact that you're comparing a free OS update with rape.

      Don't do that.

      Then how would you describe what Microsoft is doing?

      Not in a way that belittle's and demeans a very serious case of sexual assault to something akin to an inconvenience or a breach of corporate social. If you think they are comparable that says a lot...

    5. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by Tough+Love · · Score: 1

      Multiply that "inconvenience" (I gross understatement) by several hundred million and it's not a small thing at all.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    6. Re:Sex has some parts I really like by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      I dunno. The comparison is pretty apt on many levels when you actually think about it.

      1) Rape is a forceful act, in which one person is rendered powerless, then has genetic material forcefully inserted. It is considered a heinous violation, because the perpetrator does this exclusively for their own power tripping and physical pleasure, damaging another human being mentally, emotionally, and physically, then leaving them with all the consequences. It denies the victim agency, and dehumanizes them into a simple object that exists for the perps's pleasure, who's later sufferings are unimportant.

      2) This kind of forced update holds many parallels. It is also a forceful act (done without proper consent), in which the user is rendered powerless, and computer data is forcefully inserted. it should be considered and analogously heinous violation because MS is doing this exclusively for its own power tripping and financial benefit, damaging other people's businesses and system configurations, causing mental harm to users and admins who have previously told them NO repeatedly through blocking the update, setting registry keys, and uninstalling prior updates that made it through (all things MS can trivially check for but doesnt) leaving them with all the consequences of the action. This kind of policy denies the user of agency on what does and does not get installed on their system, and dehumanizes them as just statistical figures for unexploited market potential, that exist only to make MS more money, who's sufferings are unimportant to them.

      The major difference is that rape affects humans directly, where this kind of digital rape affects humans indirectly.

      Further, the kinds of justifications levied in defense of these heinous acts are very similar:

      "If she didnt want it, she shouldnt dress provacatively!"
      "If you dont want the update, you shouldn't accept security updates promiscuously!"

      When you really think about it, the two are very closely related pathologies, and handwaving it away like you did is a disservice to the people who's systems are being violated like that.

  43. Wrong title by stooo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The title is wrong. It should read :
    "Not enough Backlash Building Over Windows 10 Upgrades "

    --
    aaaaaaa
    1. Re:Wrong title by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 1


      My brother, backlash can only take you so far.

      This has become a monster, changing and adapting and worse, winning.

      We must nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.

      --
      A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
  44. Re:in other news by bug_hunter · · Score: 1

    I know they're not perfect, but the majority of Apple updates just work and don't revamp the complete user experience.
    There are two parts to this problem:
    * Aggressive updates that almost try to trick you (Apple at least doesn't do the tricking part)
    * Updates that break things

    --
    It's turtles all the way down.
  45. PC World by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    Boy, PC World, and its dozens of tracking includes on the page, are really milking this Windows10 story.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  46. Re: in other news by Incadenza · · Score: 2

    What's more, the notification windows says right in the middle "CLICK HERE TO CHANGE SCHEDULE OR CANCEL THE UPGRADE": http://core0.staticworld.net/i... So why do people who do not want the upgrade actually read the text and click there? Are they just mindlessly X-ing everything away?

    People don't read the page, the scan the page. Do a test with a group of people and an eye tracker, and they will probably see this on average:
    1. Windows 10 is recommended upgrade for this PC (“I'd rather not”)
    2. Sunday, May 22, 11:00 PM (“Certainly not! Bugger off”)
    3. OK (“No, it's not OK”)
    4. Upgrade Now (“FU! Where's the other option ?????”)
    5. X (“That's want I want: CANCEL the incestuous bastard”)

  47. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The broken HDD is very common. Many drives, as they age, effectively become 'read only'- where the heads reliably retrieve files, but new write operations damage the surface of the aged platters.

    MS just doesn't give a damn. The upgrade triggers a vast number of write operations, and as sector failures occur, Microsoft's dreadful HDD 'fix' program kick in trashing the enture drive. No yes, dribblers and creps will tediously claim this is the 'fault' of the owner for not replacing the drive when it got to this state- point the saliennt point is that the HDD faults were currently NON-CRITICAL, and the user OS settings reasonable for continued use.

    Installing a new OS on an OLD machine should only be done to a new drive, SSD or memory stick. The old drive must be left alone (and yes, someone really should copy the criticla files to a new storage location- but we all know that).

  48. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that they've already done so at least twice in the last few months.

  49. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decepti by Nunya666 · · Score: 1

    Oh, how nice. Grandpa over here is bringing back the M$ way of typing Microsoft.

    It's idiotic and adds nothing to the discussion. I bet you spell America as Amerika too... Yawn.

    Grow up, AC. "M$" is just a frigging abbreviation. Yes, it is usually used negatively, but it's still just an abbreviation.

    Using your "logic" we should stop calling desktop computers "PCs". After all, that "ancient" term was first used several decades ago.

    Idiots. Everywhere I turn, nothing but idiots.

  50. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decepti by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Care to share the actual damages you suffered at the hands of this free update reminder?

    My time. I could have used it to better myself, or masturbate or whatever.

    Please don't tell us you were tricked into installing it since you don't use Windows

    Who told you that? I talk about using Windows all the time. I paid for Win7Pro, on purpose.

    and according to you, you are the smartest motherfucker ever to walk the face of the earth.

    Alas, I still talk to ACs, so that can't possibly be the case.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  51. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Nunya666 · · Score: 2

    The result?

    2. The old office suite no longer worked.

    A friend of mine had W10 forced on him recently. He didn't notice an option to cancel the "upgrade", although it could have been there. After W10 was installed, his Office 2010 demanded the product key. He couldn't find his original installation media, so he couldn't use Office. He had something that he needed to do in Word, so he looked for alternatives. Another friend suggested OpenOffice, and he installed it just fine. He called me for help using OO, since he knows I use it in Linux. I helped him resolve his technical issue, and we have another happy non-Microsoft user.

    Since he paid for Office, he should be able to use it for as long as he wants to. The fact that W10 breaks an existing installation is silly and underhanded.

    Go Microsoft! Keep shooting yourself in the foot. Class action lawsuits rarely accomplish anything more than making a few lawyers richer than they already are. With that in mind, the best chance that Linux fans have is for Microsoft to alienate their customers so badly that they look for non-Microsoft alternatives. So far, Microsoft is doing a wonderful job of alienating their users.

  52. Re: in other news by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

    You can always decline the update and the phone will respect your choice, but I seem to be wrong about the ability to disable automatic downloading of the updates.

    Some people say that you can go to Settings -> iTunes & App Store, scroll down to 'Automatic Downloads', and turn off the Updates switch, but others say that doesn't apply to iOS updates, just apps.

    So, Apple doesn't appear to give users the option to disable update prompts altogether. Which I agree is unacceptable, even though an iOS version update is nowhere near as hazardous as a Windows version update.

  53. Re: in other news by Bert64 · · Score: 2

    When something pops up you might be in the middle of typing something, such that you press a couple more keys out of inertia before you've fully registered the popup... I've had that happen on many occasion and it's extremely annoying...

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  54. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by old_kennyp · · Score: 1

    I have disabled update process entirely for any home machines I am responsible for..None of my computers can run it effectively as they are older hardware, and the BS about "bettter performance" and "working fine on older machines" is just lies!.

  55. Re:in other news by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    OSX only offers to auto install minor updates, to update to a newer version of OSX you have to go into the app store and manually choose to download it.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  56. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by danomac · · Score: 1

    They need the old version of Office to work with their order entry system. Switching it to something else was not an option, and there's no guarantee it will work with the newer versions of Office.

  57. Re: in other news by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

    Which I agree is unacceptable, even though an iOS version update is nowhere near as hazardous as a Windows version update.

    Uh...

  58. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by macs4all · · Score: 1

    The "x" does what you think it does. It closes the notification. It does not cause upgrades to happen, and it does not stop upgrades from happening, it only closes the window. The problem is that the update is scheduled already by the time that notification appears, and you must cancel the scheduled upgrade while still in that windows instead of closing it.

    And you don't call that deceptive?

  59. Solve this the right way by Weirsbaski · · Score: 2

    They need to bring this to court, so a judge can solve this the right way-

    "Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, this court is considering fining MSoft $100Billion. But I'll totally give you an out- my laptop is running an app that sets the actual fine. If you can figure out how to get the app to NOT fine you, then we'll go with that. Otherwise you're assumed to have agreed with this dollar amount, and waived your rights to appeal. You have five minutes, and... GO!"

    --

    I am not a sig.
  60. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by fafalone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That alone isn't enough. They needed to be fined enough that they get the message. There's no way their legal department didn't inform the higher ups that this kind of abuse would leave them open to liability, but the past has proved to them any resulting fines are a minor fraction of the money they made doing it. The only way to actually discourage this kind of behavior is to make the fine so severe that their shareholders take notice. I'm thinking a whole quarters profit should get that message across, which Google tells me was $5bn in Q1 2015.

  61. Re: in other news by sphealey · · Score: 2

    Which action gave Microsoft permission to install the forced upgrade?

    sPh

  62. Re: in other news by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2

    Years and years of scummy, shady web-based malware pop-up windows with fake "Yes" and "No" buttons that do the same thing have conditioned many users to opt for the "close windows" X button as a more fool-proof way to ensure that nothing happens.

    But as others have pointed out it's too late by the time this window appears, and they don't believe the only real solution, hitting the "cancel update" button will work.

    --
    -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  63. Re:in other news by macs4all · · Score: 1

    Most Apple users are just bending over and are happily accepting anything that their supreme leader decides to thrust against them. Microsoft has slightly different history with treating customers than Apple, hence the backslash.

    That must be the reason my iPad 2 runs OS X 7, my MacBook Pro runs OS X 10.9, and until I DECIDED to upgrade my iPhone 6 plus last week, it was running iOS 8.4, the version it came with.

  64. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by kheldan · · Score: 1

    I'll sign that petition! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit!

    What do we want?
    Lawsuit!
    When do we want it?
    Now!
    What do we want?
    Lawsuit!
    When do we want it?
    Now!

    Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit! Law-suit!

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  65. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by LesFerg · · Score: 1

    $700 should not have been a large portion of the annual income for a business, I would think, if they relied so much on a single workstation.
    It sounds like it was old enough to require either replacing or a HDD upgrade already.
    No excusing the unexpected upgrade, but the business seems to be partly at fault for the extent of the damage and down-time.

    --
    If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
  66. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by LesFerg · · Score: 1

    Since he paid for Office, he should be able to use it for as long as he wants to. The fact that W10 breaks an existing installation is silly and underhanded.

    He didn't pay for Office. He paid for a license to use Office. I don't think that windows 10 broke that, it simply required proof of said license purchase, which is the one part of your Office pack that you should never throw away, lose, or borrow from somebody else.

    --
    If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
  67. How to stop windows 10 update. by clockley(571021718) · · Score: 1

    Create an admin user then create another unprivileged account. Use this account to do your work. Windows will still download window s 10 but the installer will ask for the admin account before installing.

    1. Re:How to stop windows 10 update. by NotAPK · · Score: 1

      "Create an admin user then create another unprivileged account. Use this account to do your work."

      Excellent advice, but please note that everyone should do this all the time anyway.

      Yes, badly written software will create hassles along the way. Usually they can be fixed by granting write permissions to the specific "Program Files" folder(s) that the misbehaving software is expecting.

    2. Re:How to stop windows 10 update. by Megane · · Score: 1

      Have you actually tested this? I doubt that the current user being on an unprivileged account would be enough to keep the installer from running as a system process with system permissions, just like how the rest of system updates work.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:How to stop windows 10 update. by clockley(571021718) · · Score: 1

      works on my mom laptop that runs win 7 pro.

  68. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    I was under the impression that they've already done so at least twice in the last few months.

    It's what I have followed to keep my Win 7 machines on Win 7 and there has yet to be any attempt to update them to Windows 10.

  69. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by Agripa · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is assaulting its user base with features and upgrades that they don't want.

    While removing features and compatibility that they do want.

  70. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by Mr.CRC · · Score: 1

    Yes, you stupid fool, if it was the fucking tire maker who deliberately punctured your tire!

  71. Bit here too by speedlaw · · Score: 1

    I know Apple ain't perfect, but when Win 10 showed up uninvited on a family machine, it clashed with an Netgear AC wireless dongle. Took about two hours to realize that was the problem... Since all I do is Word or Excel, I'm happy to pay the Apple tax...they never stole my time like this.....and time spent fixing a computer that was NOT broken is truly wasted time.

  72. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1
    --
    You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
  73. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    It is highly deceptive. But claiming that the "x" installs windows is also deceptive, or uninformed.

  74. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 1

    Which part is the lie "macs4all" ?

    The part where I know family members who have to cancel their unwanted ios update every single day? Or the part where I sourced that article that shows that 4 ridiculous workarounds?

    At least there are easy 3rd party apps one can use with windows to shut it up, or one can turn off windows updates entirely.

    Neither is an option with ios.

  75. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by sjames · · Score: 1

    They've already resorted to unhiding updates that the user hid. What makes you think they won't undo other actions the user takes to explicitly reject an update?

  76. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 2

    Yes, that is quite annoying. It happens a lot less often in windows 10 with the improvements to the notification area that doesn't steal the focus when notifications popup.

    Its one of the (many) actual improvements in Windows 10.*

    If Microsoft would pull its head out of its ass and let 10 sell it self it would. All the negative word of mouth about 10 are connected to the telemetry being forced on, and the windows updates from 7/8 being obnoxious.

  77. Re: in other news by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    Is this some weird thing that phone companies can turn on or something? That article is several months old, but I have never seen anything like that behaviour on the test iPad I have here.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  78. Stop adding stupid shit to the end of summaries by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    In a possibly-unrelated development, the Chinese military plans to send nuclear submarines into the Pacific Ocean.

    That's not cute. That's obnoxious. Cut that shit out.

  79. MS stole my webcam, speakers, printer and scanner by amigabill · · Score: 1

    There may be more, but the things I know don't work after installing Win10 include my laptop's webcam and speakers, and my combo printer/scanner/fax machine.

    I'm taking an online class this summer, involving video conferencing, printing stuff and scannign my work to submit online. My kid can't skype with his remote grandparents.

    Sorry MS, this is quite a fail.

    There are allegedly Win10 drivers for stuff internal in my laptop, but I haven't yet solved that riddle satisfactorily.

    The maker of my printer/scanner unit says NO, we wil lnot make any Win10 drivers for that. Screw you, buy a new one. IMHO, if MS is so insistent that Win7 and Win8 users change to Win10, then they should also make demands on vendors to mandatorily make Win10 drivers for any gizmos they made for Win7 or Win8. My printer/scanner has vendor supported drivers for both Win7 and 8, but MS wants to take this support away from me by not wanting me to continue using my Win7 Ultimate edition.

    So, since stuff no longer works, and some of that stuff probably never will work again, should I be able to sue MS, since I'd have been find if we had not been hustled into this Win10 thing?

    Before I allowed Win10 to do its thing, I did a clonezilla on my hard drive, so I can go back with a hard drive swap. Or so I assume and hope. Would MS have mangled the licensing to forbid that from working?

    My wife didn't get any confirmation or anything when hers updated, and she was in the middle of some important work that she lost and had to do over a while later. She says she said no when it asked, and I assume she got scammed by the red X means yes trick. I don't know if that's what happened or not, but makes the most sense from what she told me. She was in Virtualbox installing RedHat when hers began Win10 install and that of course did not get saved properly when the rug underneath it was pulled.

  80. Out-Gatesing Gates? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Could it be Mr. Nadella is actually a bigger dick than Gates?

    Is that possible?

  81. Change of strategy by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Instead of the stick, Microsoft will now try the carrot.

    1. Re:Change of strategy by Megane · · Score: 1

      I don't think that picture accurately reflects the concept of "the carrot".

      A more appropriate analogy would be a rectally inserted carrot.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  82. Re:MS stole my webcam, speakers, printer and scann by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Your printer/scanner probably even speaks the same (proprietary) protocol as modern, supported devices, and all it would take to make it work would be a hex editor... if not for driver signing.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  83. Re: in other news by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Which action gave Microsoft permission to install the forced upgrade?

    I can't speak for everyone, but I can say with surety that Microsoft asked me for my permission to install Windows 10. They asked me fairly early, so it was before the full extent of telemetry was well-known, and I said yes. I am still running Windows 7; I cancelled the process, then went on to hide updates, and use GWX Control Panel to "make sure" that something Microsoft does in the future doesn't bring it back. I've also used this thread to compile a batch to remove the offensive updates (telemetry, windows 10 related, etc) which I would paste here if allowed. But it isn't. It's not a difficult exercise anyway.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  84. Re: in other news by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    All the negative word of mouth about 10 are connected to the telemetry being forced on, and the windows updates from 7/8 being obnoxious.

    don't forget the typical lack of drivers. all of my hardware is pretty recent (except my printer, which speaks PCL and PS) so I suspect it would all work OK, but telemetry is a non-starter. But a lot of people are having driver problems of the usual sort that tends to accompany a new windows version. really the only time that hasn't been true has been win2k->winxp, and vista->win7... for obvious reasons. Every other windows upgrade is accompanied by the sound of pocketbooks emptying as people buy new printers, multifunction devices, and scanners in particular. A while later, they show up at a flea market or yard sale for a few bucks, and then I use them with Linux.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  85. Re: in other news by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    That said, what Microsoft is doing would be the equivalent of installing the update when you hit no/cancel in your iPad.

    Interestingly enough what happens when you hit no / cancel, and then you have a problem with your iPad? Take it to either the genius bar, get a warranty replacement, or do a factory restore using iTunes and then tell me how much of a "choice" you have staying with the OS version of your choice.

    Though I do agree there's an order of magnitude difference between forcing an update on a PC which may have all sorts of critical use cases, and forcing an update on a toy.

  86. Re:in other news by Zumbs · · Score: 2

    Liar. I sit here typing this on my iPad 2, running iOS 7. It is eligible for iOS 9.2.3 (or whatever the most recent rev. Is); bit I don't CHOOSE to upgrade. About once every few weeks, I see a REMINDER that the new version of iOS is ready for download. I DISMISS the Dialog by clicking "Not Now" or whatever, and THAT IS THE END OF THAT.

    I have an iPad Pro 9.7 running iOS 9.3.1, and *every* day I get a reminder for upgrading to iOS 9.3.2, even though it has been pulled for that particular model due to a nasty bricking bug. When I press select the option to postpone the installation, I get sent to a login screen with a very well hidden "press here to cancel update" link. You really ought to do your research before throwing around words like liar and asshole.

    --
    The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
  87. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    I used to hate the term shill as it was used to describe "everyone I disagree with". I hated it even more when I got called a shill, mainly because I figured if I should put up with that name calling the least someone could do was pay me for it.

    But now... Despite all the good technical features windows 10 offers, and despite it being a somewhat solid system underneath MS's fucked up business decisions, people seem to defend the absolute indefensible.

    I'm now reasonably certain there are MS shills on here.

  88. What happens when the free upgrade period ends? by naranek · · Score: 2

    The free upgrade period for Windows 10 ends in July. What happens after that? Microsoft is pushing it so hard that it's really hard to see them putting a price tag to it.

    --
    Only dumb birds land downwind.
    1. Re:What happens when the free upgrade period ends? by vandamme · · Score: 1

      They will pay you to install Windows X. Double if you're now a Linux user.

  89. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1

    I bet MS still installed all the 'telemetry' crap on your PC(s).

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
  90. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by houghi · · Score: 1

    Unwanted update asside, what would have happend if the HD would have gone out without the upgrade? Hardware breaks. Shit happens.
    The real issue here is that they did not have a backup in place. Even worse, they had a single point of failure and that broke.

    Here is what should have happened:
    1) Do the (or any) upgrade and it breaks
    2) Restore the situation as to when it was not broken with backups.
    3) Start looking at a solution for the failed upgrade.
    This could be Windows, Linux kernel or Notepad upgrades for all I care. There should have been no reason for non working software (points 2-5) after a restore.

    The real issue is that the company was not ready and it was just a disaster waiting to happen where the WIndows update was merely the last drip in the bucket.

    To me an OS version update is nice when it works, but I NEVER expect it to do. And that is while running Linux and having done many upgrades without any issue. I will never expect it to work. I can hope, but never expect as people will never know what I have done to my machine after I first booted it.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  91. Re:Does Microsoft even look at the microblogging s by Megane · · Score: 1
    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  92. Re: in other news by Megane · · Score: 1

    People who put web links (or web-style links) on the word "here" should be drawn and quartered. There's also very bad contrast between one word in dark blue next to the rest of the words in black on a white background, making it hard to even see that it's a link, not to mention that the word "here" isn't underlined, further reducing its visibility as an active UI element, to the point where one might suspect that it was made intentionally hard to see.

    3GB+ file download. Internet access fees may apply."

    Thanks Microsoft, for going ahead and downloading it for everyone anyhow! My experience was that the thing dumped 6.5 GB in a hidden folder with fucked up access permissions (so you couldn't delete it even as Administrator without doing some deep magic). Good thing I caught it in time. But I would have to admit that yes, that was in fact more than 3GB.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  93. Re: in other news by Megane · · Score: 1

    and they don't believe the only real solution, hitting the "cancel update" button will work.

    It might matter if it was actually a button. Instead, it's the word "here", in blue, without even an underline to draw attention to it as something clickable. Having to click on the word "here" to stop a forced upgrade is much dumber than having to click on the Start menu to shut down the system.

    The only real solution is to put Windows Update on full manual mode, then ignore it. But you have to do that before the GWX update installs, or after you manually remove it.

    Well, actually, the only real solution is Linux, but that's a bit much for most people. And that brings in the whole systemd thing. Maybe BSD?

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  94. OP by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    To the submitter: Please do not put links to a paywall site because it is absolutely fucking useless for the vast majority of people here.

    "You've reached a subscriber-only article."

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  95. Re: in other news by sociocapitalist · · Score: 3

    "Apple is just an example.My mom's ipad nags her to upgrade every single day. Where are the stories that apple is pushing unwanted upgrades with no way to shut them off?"

    I get nagged every few days to upgrade my iphone and a simple touch of the screen puts the annoying box away.

    I clicked yes once by mistake and got a confirmation box, where I clicked no.

    There was no automatic installing at random hours.
    There was no installing anyway when I clicked anywhere other than 'no'.
    When I clicked yes by mistake, a verification gave me the chance to say 'no' again.

    So no, it isn't the same thing that Windows 10 (aka Windows Shaft) has been doing to users - including my father in law the doctor who clicked on the x and had his system upgraded anyway, resulting in his medical applications no longer running.

    No, it really isn't the same thing at all.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  96. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    This was their only functioning workstation

    This is why Microsoft doesn't give a shit if your customer is angry or not.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  97. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decept by dugancent · · Score: 1

    No, MS is an abbreviation. M$ is childless.

    --
    SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
  98. Re:this happens when you trick and mislead your us by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    slash is popular enough that it has attracted quite a lot of 'bad elements'.

    there are paid shills here, absolutely sure of that. its obvious to anyone who has spent time here and seen the discourse.

    it was once very left-leaning and progressive and now the conservatives have invaded and will mod down, in army-like fashion, anything they disagree with.

    slash has been invaded. but most of us knew that years ago.

    soylent is quite a lot better; but they are not the target that slash is, in terms of trying to counter-spin common sense.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  99. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by jbengt · · Score: 1

    The problem is that the update is scheduled already by the time that notification appears, and you must cancel the scheduled upgrade while still in that windows instead of closing it.

    I believe that the only choices in that dialog are to click "OK" or to close the window with the little red "x". (at least that was true previously, the upgrade pop ups have been disabled on my work machine)

  100. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 1

    No, it really isn't the same thing at all.

    On the other hand, Microsoft makes it easy to roll back to your existing version of windows after you update; good luck doing that with Apple.

  101. dichotomy by a1englishman · · Score: 1

    So wait, we cry foul when our Android phones don't get upgraded to the next version of Android, but damn Microsoft for upgrading everyone to Windows 10?

    Yeah, I understand your Windows 7 works great on your ten-year-old PC, but it's going to run out of updates soon, and if your PC's that old maybe you should consider something a little more modern, or get a version of Linux that will keep it going. For the majority of "just make my PC work" folk, automatic upgrades are great. Keep the machine up to date and not force the users to think.

  102. Re: in other news by sociocapitalist · · Score: 2

    No, it really isn't the same thing at all.

    On the other hand, Microsoft makes it easy to roll back to your existing version of windows after you update; good luck doing that with Apple.

    Fair point but I still don't class it up there with surprise unstoppable upgrades of the OS.

    If Apple does go that route then I'll be screaming right along with the rest.

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  103. Re: EU should act over forced upgrades via decept by clarkn0va · · Score: 1

    I think the word you're looking for is "barren"

    --
    I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
  104. Re: in other news by Keybounce · · Score: 1

    Kindle Fire pushed an update that broke Android File Transfer

    I have a Kindle Fire, 7in, HD. Came with OS 4.5.

    This was the first Kindle I had that could not just be hooked up to my Mac and appear as a drive. But in fairness, it was also my first kindle that was more than just a book reader.

    Still, using Android File Transfer, it could move books onto it. No problem.

    I had a chance to try out OS 5.something on the newer 6in. Decided that it wasn't worth it (this was when I was buying it -- the older generation, twice the price, 7in HD was a better buy than the cheaper, lower-quality, newer 6in). I did not like the new OS. Did not want it. And yes, that was a factor, but not the deciding factor, in getting the 7in.

    Then, OS 5 was pushed on me by force. Could not undo. Called up Amazon. Was told that it was possible to revert by doing a "restore to factory settings", to put it back the way it was, and that doing so would tell the update system not to force a re-update.

    Well, if I attempted to restore my backup from Amazon, that would force an upgrade to the newest OS.
    And attempting to revert without restoring? Still left me with the new OS.

    There's no way to go back. Heck, iOS doesn't let you go back either, but last I checked, it did not force you to upgrade if you didn't want to.

    The only good thing about the win10 upgrade is that you *CAN* go back.
    No one else lets you go back.
    More and more, everyone is forcing you to go forward whether you want to or not.

    Gee, I'm so glad I *own* what I *bought*, and people attempting to run unauthorized code on my machine are fined and/or arrested/jailed for hacking. Oh, wait ...

  105. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

    Yes, but try explaining that to a Sr. Manager or bean-counter. It may be 2016, but clients still don't like support people walking in and telling them "you're PC's busted... pay money." "Not busted, working fine." "Microsoft has done something stupid. Must spend money, fix PC before breaks." "Nonesense! My equipment is functioning just fine.. leave me alone." "No. PC broken. Watch." **reboots PC, Windows 10 begins to install all by itself, freezes on blue-screen after third restart** "See, PC broken. That'll be $700."

    Microsoft may seem like a bunch of idiots to IT savvy people, but to business types it appears much more like an extortion racket.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  106. Re:Then don't use Windows by WheezyJoe · · Score: 3, Informative

    This. Like the Hitler thing, there will always be someone who flippantly posts "just don't use windows" with a misguided air of superiority.
    So, in a futile attempt to put this to rest: if it were that easy, that's what people would do.

    But it isn't, and Microsoft knows it, and that's why they're doing what they're doing.
    If you don't rely on software that requires Windows, happy for you. If you got the spare time and the inclination, there's Linux or BSD; otherwise, Macs have become pretty damn bullet-proof turnkey solutions for getting the essentials taken care of and then some. Throw in a Playstation 4, and you've got games covered, too.

    But for the rest of us, it's a huge shit sandwich, and we're all gotta have to take a bite.

    --
    Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
  107. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by asvravi · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Slashdot - where even facts are modded flamebait by frothing zombies just because the facts happen to favor of Microsoft!

  108. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Bizarre. I said nothing there in favor of Microsoft. I was just clarifying misinformation coming from journalists reporting that the "x" button was what caused the upgrades. Which might lead someone to interpret it as "I'll reboot my computer instead, that will fix it!", or "I'll be smart and kill it with task manager instead!"

    That is why this is deceptive. Microsoft knows the customers are not expecting to have to actively opt-out and that most are likely to just close the box instead of reading it closely. They probably have some tech savvy friends saying "Windows will never upgrade itself unless you agree" (and I know some of them).

  109. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Look at the screenshot. There is a third choice. Windows 7 users may hot recognize it because it's in the new "Metro" UI style.
    See: http://images.techhive.com/ima...
    That word "here" in blue is a clickable link. Click on it and you can get somewhere to cancel the upgrade (not sure what it looks like there though).

    Of course the Microsoft lawyers will interpret passive action as passive consent to the upgrade.

  110. Re:I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Oh ya, one more note, the new notification is not the same as the older ones that said "upgrade now" versus "start download and upgrade later" versus "X".

  111. Remember you can revert by baerd · · Score: 1

    This is slightly tangential, but if you've 'upgraded' to Win 10 you can revert back to Win 7. I did this myself as I had issues with Win 10 breaking my router (as in it stopped working for all devices not just the PC) and I didn't know you could revert, but found some instructions online. If you've been hoodwinked into Win 10 and are not happy I suggest googling the steps to revert back to what you had before.

    --
    I wish I had a lawn.
  112. Re: I agree, its trickery shame on Microsoft by Zebai · · Score: 1

    I agree Windows 10 has a lot of features and improvements that are nice to have. It is the reason I upgraded myself to Windows 10, however I don't do an "upgrade" like most people have I always do OS Installs on a fresh format usually on a new hardrive with the old one still there as a backup.

    After using windows 10 for months now however I must confess it also has features that I extremely dislike so I have both gained and lost. Windows update on windows 10 is no longer optional it is a mandatory process with a mandatory reboot. This along with a few other "features" has caused me some headache. I've managed to mitigate most of them. Its much more manageable now though since I figured out how to break part of the automatic reboot process since part of it is controlled by the task scheduler but it required changing ownership of several files and making them read only.

  113. Re: in other news by Zumbs · · Score: 1

    Given how much I paid for it, I expect it to "just work". When I press the "Later" button, I expect that the update gets postponed to some later time. I do not expect that it tries to start the OS update - I don't have sausage fingers. I also expect that a pulled update does not keep prompting me to update my device, and that I can find official word and updates on the home page of the manufacturer. Alas, I have to rely on 3rd party articles, referencing twitter updates from some guy.

    In W7, I can right click a particular update and select hide. Up until recently that would effectively hide the update forever. The W10 update is just crap from a user perspective, no argument there.

    --
    The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
  114. Re: in other news by msoftsucks · · Score: 1

    Hahaha!!! Really! When Windows 10 rapes your machine it auto uninstalls quite a few programs. Programs that Micro$haft doesn't want on your machine. When you try to rollback, these programs do not get reinstalled. In some cases such as Microsoft's own Media Center, once its been removed, its been removed forever.

    --
    Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
    Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.
  115. Re: in other news by vux984 · · Score: 1

    it auto uninstalls quite a few programs

    Because leaving stuff that is incompatible is a good idea?

    When you try to rollback, these programs do not get reinstalled

    Oh noes. I have to reinstall CPUZ myself. Meanwhile your ios device once rolled forward... never goes back. But we're busy hating on microsoft here so we'll give that a pass.

    In some cases such as Microsoft's own Media Center, once its been removed, its been removed forever.

    That's actually interesting. Cite?
    I found several articles that discussed reinstalling Media Center after it was uninstalled; so that's possible. I didn't see anything specifically addressing the rollback from windows 10 scenario though... so as I said... Cite?

    All I could find when i tried searchingwere articles on how to get it installed and running on Windows 10... which apparently is quite easy to do...if you wanted it... which is itself sort of a weird thing for someone called msoftsucks to want... i'd think if you were using windows at all, you'd be on kodi or something.

  116. A lady marched into office of Microsoft by Olotila · · Score: 1

    A Finnish lady marched into office of Microsoft with unwillingly updated computer and after threatening with a lawsuit got it back with Windows 7 the next day. Finnish Female marched into a Microsoft office Translated version

  117. Re:EU should act over forced upgrades via deceptio by martinfb · · Score: 1

    ALL governments that are FOR the people should enact, and act, on legislation to allow buyers: 1) FULL disclosure of a product and it's usage ramifications, and; 2) have abilities to OPT IN what ever 'features' / settings are deemed desired, and; 3) charge ANY company fees to allow any product to do ANY advertising whatsoever.

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  118. Re: in other news by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Well that just goes to show you should research your purchases and ensure the devices you buy support standard protocols, instead of buying whatever is cheap at the time...
    My printer for instance supports Postscript, which ensures it works by default with pretty much anything. And i have a networked scanner which sends jobs via email.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!