Slashdot Mirror


EU Leader Says English Is Losing Importance (politico.eu)

An anonymous reader writes: Jean-Claude Juncker, the European Commission president, opted to deliver a speech in French on Friday morning because he said "English is losing importance" in Europe. He gave the comments, which are unlikely to mend fences after a war of words between Brussels and London over Brexit negotiations, at the "State of the Union" conference in Florence's Palazzo Vecchio -- an annual event for European dignitaries. Juncker said he was opting for French because "slowly but surely English is losing importance in Europe and France has elections this Sunday and I want the French people to understand what I am saying about the importance of the EU." He spoke in English.

435 of 711 comments (clear)

  1. ... Says the Frenchman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course someone who speaks French thinks English is "losing importance." They've been asserting that for decades now, because they are delusional. Anybody who ever has needed to deal with software written in France by French companies knows just how arrogant they are about speaking and writing French and only French, even if it means inconveniencing literally everyone else around them.

    1. Re:... Says the Frenchman by ctilsie242 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some software is pretty good from France. VeraCrypt is a good example of something well made.

    2. Re:... Says the Frenchman by ichthus · · Score: 1, Troll

      Was it written in a French-based programming language, or an English one?

      --
      sig: sauer
    3. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      He is not really French, he is from Luxembourg where French is one of 3 official languages. This is like calling an Irishman a Brit, or an Englishman. Only 16% of the population are native French speakers, although 96% of the population is fluent in French. The primary native language is Luxembourgish, which is closer to German than French.
      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_of_Luxembourg

    4. Re:... Says the Frenchman by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 2, Informative
      English is not the #1 language in the EU, even before Brexit"

      In accordance with the EU population, the most widely spoken mother tongue is German (16%), followed by Italian and English (13% each), French (12%), then Spanish and Polish (8% each).

      After Brexit, it will be worse. It's true that English is used as a second language by a significant portion of the population, but the same can be said for many other languages, given that much of the population speaks 2 or more languages. Interestingly, the UK is among the lowest ranking countries when it comes to being able to speak in a second language.

      Current EU population is 504 million. The UK is 64 million, of which 88% (56 million) speak English as their mother tongue. After taking out those 56 million, the number of people who speak English as their mother tongue in the EU drops to only a few million out of the remaining 404 million population. In other words, less than 1%.

      Source

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Was it written in a French-based programming language, or an English one?

      There's a Brazilian language called 'Lua' whose control structures are English words [if, while, etc]. Why reinventing the wheel? No reason to be chauvinist about it.

    6. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Informative

      English is not the #1 language in the EU, even before Brexit"

      In accordance with the EU population, the most widely spoken mother tongue is German (16%), followed by Italian and English (13% each), French (12%), then Spanish and Polish (8% each).

      Check your stat definitions before using them to make a point. Those are 'native tongue' percentages. 51% speak English.

    7. Re:... Says the Frenchman by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      tabarnak, les francais francaises connu-pas le vrai francaises quebecois esti.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      Trop de francaises!

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    8. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Was it written in a French-based programming language, or an English one?

      Since i am a Greek, when communicating with Barbarians like you i am forced to use a Barbaric language (in my case the -common among Barbarians- language called English) instead of the language of the Gods: Greek!

      But a PROGRAMING language based in French or English (or any other "natural" language)? Does such a thing exist? I always though that the -few- "natural" words used in any programing language can easily be translated in any natural language (and even better: use symbols/ideograms instead!) since the syntax/phrasing is so simple: a mathematic language actually.

      P.S. Sorry for my English... but then again: it is not my fault that you are barbarians and can not communicate in Greece!

    9. Re:... Says the Frenchman by cide1 · · Score: 1

      Since i am a Greek, when communicating with Barbarians like you i am forced to use a Barbaric language (in my case the -common among Barbarians- language called English) instead of the language of the Gods: Greek!

      I've known several Greeks over the years, and all of them have said basically this to me at some point.

      --
      -- the computer doesn't want any beer, no matter how much you think it does. NEVER, EVER feed your computer beer.
    10. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Was it written in a French-based programming language, or an English one?

      There's a Brazilian language called 'Lua' whose control structures are English words [if, while, etc]. Why reinventing the wheel? No reason to be chauvinist about it.

      You don't understand the Francophone world then. Be in Quebec or France, they actually write laws about making it illegal to use words that are from other languages.

      One day "Le Weekend" is understood and used by everyone, the next it has been outlawed and illegal to use in mass media. It's a very chauvinistic attitude.

      Compare the French to the Germans, who not only embrace all sorts of languages, it is considered educated to know and use words from other languages in their speech and adopt them into German.

      Which sounds the healthier attitude to you?

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    11. Re:... Says the Frenchman by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      The poster said 'mother tongue.' That is the same as saying 'native tongue.'

    12. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK, my mistake, but it makes the point completely stupid. English will still be the most widely spoken language after Brexit.

    13. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

      Yes but when a german and a frenchwoman get together for business, they'll most likely talk english.
      Same for the Greek and Belgian business people.

      And when italians meet with germans, belgians, french and swiss- they'll speak english.

      At least until completely reliable real time translation apps come along and it no longer matters.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    14. Re:... Says the Frenchman by vux984 · · Score: 2

      I always though that the -few- "natural" words used in any programing language can easily be translated in any natural language

      Perhaps, but aside from the keywords all the standard library function names are in english, all the standard library intellitext documentation is in english; all the comments, constant names, #defines and macro names, are in English.

      If you have the source for the standard libraries, all the internal class and member names, variable names, function names, and even the comments, etc ... are all in English.

      Then all the compiler warnings, and compilation errors, runtime exceptions, etc... in many cases aren't localized, or are localized poorly (which is possibly worse), or even if they are localized its still often better to get them in english because it's generally much easier to find online support and help if you search for the english message then the localized one.

      I think anyone programming **seriously** benefits from knowing english. The language keywords are just the tip of the iceberg.

    15. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by aevan · · Score: 5, Informative
    16. Re:... Says the Frenchman by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      For the next generation, with every phone having Babelfish capabilities, it really won't matter. It doesn't have to be completely reliable. Even communication between 2 speakers of the same language isn't completely reliable. Just look at the misunderstanding of "draining the swamp", or "make America great again."

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    17. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      That's because French used to jave a major world importance, which then faded and was replaced by English. When English loses world importance you will be seeing Brits and Americans becoming chauvinistic about the language as well. It's already pretty true, just witness the American tourists who seem angry that they can't be understood in some places.

      I liked the attitude in Finland, which was "why the hell do you want to learn Finnish?"

    18. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      What you speak is gutter speech. The honored Greek is long dead, As for teaching us Barbarians, Rome gave us the engineering, math and all the solid stuff, our numerals are Arabic, what we got from Greece is bath houses and philosophy based in a world that lacked a logical framework. Nothing to be sneezed at but of course but even the concept of Zero originated elsewhere.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    19. Re:... Says the Frenchman by vtcodger · · Score: 2

      I believe that it is a French tradition to declare English to be a dying language on Star Wars Day (May 4) every year. The practice purportedly dates back at least to 1415AD when Charles the VI's inflamatory anti-English language Star Wars Day speech purportedly led directly to the Battle of Agincourt in October of that year and thus to a dramatic change in direction in the Hundred Years War.

      (Charles VI was reportedly exceptionally crazed even for a 15th Century European monarch.)

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    20. Re:... Says the Frenchman by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      But a PROGRAMING language based in French or English (or any other "natural" language)? Does such a thing exist?

      It depends on how narrow your definaition of "based" is. In general the syntax of programing languages is totally different from any natural language, but the vocabuary borrows heavilly from English.

      I always though that the -few- "natural" words

      In the core language spec relatively few words are used but once you include the libraries nessacery to do anything useful with the language you see a much larger number of words. Nearly always taken from english.

      can easily be translated in any natural language

      Could be but very rarely are.

      (and even better: use symbols/ideograms instead!)

      Works for a few of the most common things but you quickly run out of symbols that can be displayed and entered easilly on most computers arround the world.

      Languages that require non-ascii characters have been tried but have remained the exception.

      P.S. Sorry for my English.

      Your english seems fine to me.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    21. Re:... Says the Frenchman by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      And by the same token, you're inflating your count by including a significant number of people who THINK they speak a second language (including English) fluently, but don't.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    22. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      That's because French used to jave a major world importance, which then faded and was replaced by English. When English loses world importance you will be seeing Brits and Americans becoming chauvinistic about the language as well. It's already pretty true, just witness the American tourists who seem angry that they can't be understood in some places.

      I liked the attitude in Finland, which was "why the hell do you want to learn Finnish?"

      That's already true. Brits get rather annoyed when you use an Americanised word or an American spelling in the UK. Some people are exceptionally hostile to Americanisms. You don't see anyone trying to pass laws or punish people for using Americanisms though.

      / ironically, many "American" words that British people hate on, originated in Britain, they just fell out of common usage in Britain for a while.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    23. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean "draining the swamp" and "literally denying food to preschoolers to give tax breaks to the wealthy"?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    24. Re:... Says the Frenchman by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      It is still not true.
      Polish meeting Spanish in Paris will likely speak English and not French, because one of both wont speek French, one of both wont speak Polish, and one of both wont speak Spanish.
      Same for any other combination of countriees and meeting points.
      Or do you really think there are more than a hand full non finish people in eurpoe that actually speak finish? Or do you think otherwise, there more than a few thousand Finns that don't speak english? Or do you think finnland will scratch engllish now from the school curriculum? Or any other EU country will?

      Countries like Netherlands, Denmark, Estonia, Lithuania are to small that any other country will put their languages into the school curriculum (that was exagerated). And no one in europe is so dumb to remove English from it. And we most certainly don't select one or two languages as european lingua franca. The rest of the world is mainly explored with English and Spanish, so both will stay in the curriculum.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    25. Re:... Says the Frenchman by ichthus · · Score: 1

      No reason to be chauvinist about it.

      I asked a simple question. Besides, I would never be a chauvinist -- that's a word with French etymology.

      --
      sig: sauer
    26. Re:... Says the Frenchman by smelch · · Score: 1

      What matters the most is how many people will understand you when you speak. More people understand English in the EU than any other language. Mother tongue may give some sort of hint at which direction the most widely understood language may go in, but that's not necessarily true.

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    27. Re:... Says the Frenchman by jandersen · · Score: 1

      Compare the French to the Germans, who not only embrace all sorts of languages, it is considered educated to know and use words from other languages in their speech and adopt them into German.

      Dateien und Festplattenspeicher?

    28. Re:... Says the Frenchman by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      As you note. The brits are already language chauvinistic.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    29. Re:... Says the Frenchman by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Soon the Americans will prove that they're just as enlightened as the Greeks by running their economy straight into the ground through idiotic tax policy.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    30. Re:... Says the Frenchman by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      you are a barbarian

      The word you are looking for is commonly anglicised as 'gwelow'.

      Better than 'gaijin' or 'gaiji'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    31. Re:... Says the Frenchman by trenien · · Score: 1
      That crap again.

      The first time I saw it, I didn't really pay attention and shelved like so many facts we hear.

      And then, I started to think about it. So, what are the numbers? I used the CIA World Factbook as a source

      Do note that I'm talking about native speakers here, like on that propaganda website

      So, first, English native speakers. In Europe, that means British, Irish and a handful in Malta. Total number is about 69 millions

      Italian speakers are basically in Italy and Switzerland. All together, it means around 64 millions.

      Then, French speakers. That's France, and the French speakers in Belgium (There are also a number of them in Switzerland, but that country isn't part of the EU). That adds up to a bit more than 70 millions.

      So they're giving percentage numbers that are clearly worthless

      First time I saw that (years ago), I decided to assume it was some mistake on the part of someone. Considering the mistake is still there, I can only conclude this is actually deliberate to make English seem more legitimate than it actually is.

    32. Re:... Says the Frenchman by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Not to be rude but are you sure you are descended from ancient greeks? Is it possible that you're more of a modern Greek / Ancient Turk?

    33. Re:... Says the Frenchman by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      Who up-voted that ignorant post?
      Le weekend is still used in France, while Quebec has a translation (la fin de semaine). It's just a matter of regional differences (just like UK vs US English).
      There is no such thing as laws forbidding the import of words from other languages. French is made of thousands of words from other languages.

    34. Re:... Says the Frenchman by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      it's like you just described a lingua franca

    35. Re:... Says the Frenchman by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Was it written in a French-based programming language, or an English one?

      Since i am a Greek, when communicating with Barbarians like you i am forced to use a Barbaric language (in my case the -common among Barbarians- language called English) instead of the language of the Gods: Greek!

      But a PROGRAMING language based in French or English (or any other "natural" language)? Does such a thing exist? I always though that the -few- "natural" words used in any programing language can easily be translated in any natural language (and even better: use symbols/ideograms instead!) since the syntax/phrasing is so simple: a mathematic language actually.

      P.S. Sorry for my English... but then again: it is not my fault that you are barbarians and can not communicate in Greece!

      Why don't you (Greeks) then all convert en masse to the religion of the Gods - the Hellenic religion, so to speak? Resume worshipping Zeus, Athena, Aphrodite, et al. After all, that religion is indeed very cultured and has strong parallels to Hinduism, and you'd prove your 'superiority' if you worshipped the same gods whose language you claim to uphold!

    36. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      our numerals are Arabic

      You misspelled 'Hindu'

    37. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by Khyber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I guess you failed English coprehension, as all of those links provide plenty of support for French-only stuff.

      BTW, I've been in Quebec. I've also done business with Quebec, years later. So I can personally say that yes, there are quite strict laws regarding when a foreign language is allowed to be used, otherwise you're FORCED to use French (or the bastardization of it that the Quebecois call 'French.')

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    38. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by unixisc · · Score: 1

      ROTFL

    39. Re:... Says the Frenchman by unixisc · · Score: 1

      As would Brahma, Indra, Surya, Agni, Vayu and others in their pantheon

    40. Re:... Says the Frenchman by unixisc · · Score: 1

      That's b'cos they were conquered successively by the Romans, Byzantines and Turks, and didn't get to express themselves. And by the time they could, they were a shadow of their ancient selves

    41. Re:... Says the Frenchman by unixisc · · Score: 1

      When people from similar language groups meet, won't that be different? Like if a Frenchman meets a Spaniard, chances are that they'll both understand each other's language somewhat, despite the differences. Similarly for Italian and Portugese. Likewise, when Danes meet Swedes or Germans meet Norwegians, will they still speak English instead of their rather similar languages?

    42. Re:... Says the Frenchman by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter what they think, or how bad they are. Fact remains that those people whose secondary/tertiary/quadrary/... language is English would speak that w/ people who are not their compatriots. Yeah, there'll be exceptions, like Spaniards talking to Portugese, or Germans talking to Swedes, or Turks talking to Arabs, but otherwise, the number of people who understand and speak English dwarfs those who do the same for French, Spanish, German and all the others.

    43. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Go back a very short 100 years. When you wrote scientific papers it was common to use German, amongst others. Today it's almost 100% English. What matters is not the number of people who speak the language natively, but how often it is used internationally as a means to communicate across cultures. for hundreds of years, Latin was the primary language for communicating across boundaries, even though it had zero native speakers. English can very easily lose it's position here.

      Spanish has more native speakers than native English speakers. English has more total speakers because of the number who learn it as a second language, and that is to communicate with others for the purpose of business, science, culture, etc. When the need to learn English as a second language starts to fade then English will lose its place on the world stage. Spanish speaking countries other than Spain tend to be of lower economic importance, which is one reason why it isn't more dominant than English. However Mandarin speaking countries have extremely high economic important, and it is likely going to replace the US as the 800lb gorilla someday.

      As for the EU, since the UK is leaving and there will remain only one EU member state with English as one of its official languages, this means that English is indeed losing its importance to the EU as Junker says.

    44. Re:... Says the Frenchman by jaklode · · Score: 1

      Let's just force everyone to learn German and be done with it.

    45. Re:... Says the Frenchman by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      My experience is: Yes, they will speak English.

      As a matter of fact, my experience tells me you'll fall back to the language that most speak reasonably well, which turn out to be English in nearly all situations.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    46. Re:... Says the Frenchman by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Or a lingua brittanica. ;-)

    47. Re:... Says the Frenchman by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Which sounds the healthier attitude to you?

      tbh the French approach seems healthier to me.....it ensures ancient documents will be more likely to be understood.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    48. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Archfeld · · Score: 1

      There is one area I had totally overlooked. Greek theatre/arts. The art of the play and sculpture the rest of the world was bequeathed by ancient Greece is in itself both astounding and phenomenal.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    49. Re:... Says the Frenchman by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Do musical scores in French have words like "Allegro" in them? Italian gave us all the keywords for music, just like English gave us the keywords for programming.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    50. Re:... Says the Frenchman by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I have sympathyâ with the Greeks in that regard.
      The worst ofc are the English speaking barbarians, not being able to pronounce a single Greek god correctly ... pretty sad.
      On the other hand they also can not pronounce most Germanic/Nordic gods correctly.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    51. Re:... Says the Frenchman by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      If you remove the Italian, you are right.
      I have been in talks at a table where everyone spoke English except the Italian ... he only spoke Italian.
      If an Italian approaches you outside his country you can bet he first addresses you in Italian :)

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    52. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Dogers · · Score: 1

      Brits get rather annoyed when you use an Americanised word or an American spelling in the UK

      Only when it's in something calling itself English. It's not English, it's American English or International English, not English English..

      --
      I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    53. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Calydor · · Score: 1

      German and Norwegian is similar enough to just speak each their own language?

      Get real.

      Danish, Swedish and Norwegian are known to be unique in that native speakers of each will understand the other two decently well, especially if both speakers make an effort to speak slowly and clearly.

      I'm Danish. I live in Germany, just half an hour's drive from the Danish border, and I can assure you that the Germans here more often than not do NOT understand more than two words of Danish.

      English is a good language to use as a fallback option if for no other reason than the fact that so much of our entertainment is made in English. American English, but still English. Now, if countries like Germany and France would stop dubbing EVERYTHING that crosses their borders, be it games or movies, then they might realize how smart it is to have a language in common with everyone.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    54. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That "bastardization" of French was standardized 300 years before the France French agreed on a common tongue. Do your homework racist dimwit.

    55. Re:... Says the Frenchman by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      2 actually - Malta and Ireland.

    56. Re:... Says the Frenchman by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Gwelow: barbarian, literally; foreign ghost, non-chinese.

      I know, never explain the joke...

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    57. Re:... Says the Frenchman by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is and they do.

      In Quebec City, all the souvenir shops sell t-shirts emblazoned with tabarnak, calise etc. Who buys them? The French (from France) people I met seemed very amused that such innocuous terms from Catholic mass could be used as expletives.

    58. Re:... Says the Frenchman by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      People mostly speak in their native tongue, not in English. English will not be the most commonly used language in the EU, German will.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    59. Re:... Says the Frenchman by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Of course if you go there. Then the grunts and gestures of cavemen represent the height of language?!? Logically the most modern language would be the most advanced rather than the most primitive language. English tends to lead not so much because of adhering to tradition but because it continually evolves, adding new words and usage continually.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    60. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by Jesus+H+Rolle · · Score: 1

      You don't really know Homer until you've read him in the original Klingon.

    61. Re:... Says the Frenchman by colinwb · · Score: 1


      It seems a correct answer is yes and no:

      * Debussy - String Quartet (1893)
      1. Animé et très décidé
      2. Assez vif et bien rythmé
      3. Andantino, doucement expressif
      4. Très modéré - En animant peu à peu - Très mouvementé et avec passion

      * Faure - String Quartet (1924)
      1. Allegro moderato
      2. Andante
      3. Allegro

      Perhaps the above is not surprising, because Faure was 17 years older than Debussy, but intriguingly:

      * Ravel - String Quartet (1903)
      1. Allegro moderato - très doux
      2. Assez vif - très rythmé
      3. Très lent
      4. Vif et agité

      * Debussy - Violin Sonata (1917)
      1. Allegro vivo
      2. Intermède: Fantasque et léger
      3. Finale: Très animé

      A German mixed example:
      * Schumann - Piano Sonata 2 in G minor (1831-1838)
      1. So rasch wie möglich ("As quickly as possible" — however, near the end, Schumann writes "Schneller" and then "Noch schneller", meaning "Faster" and "Still faster")
      2. Andantino. Getragen
      3. Scherzo. Sehr rasch und markiert
      4. Rondo. Presto

    62. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    63. Re:... Says the Frenchman by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

      Parent post is touching on what is truly important, which is which language, outside of each speaker's native language, is the speaker's audience most likely to be competent in? Unfortunately, author of parent post failed to understand the importance of a common second language.

      English is by far the most common second language in the world.

      The number of persons for whom English is a second language now far outnumbers the number of persons who speak English as their native tongue. Within business and technology, the overwhelming amount of communication is done in English. There is vastly more publication and correspondence in English between non-native speakers of English than there is between native English speakers.

      When a Finn, a Frenchman, and a Brazilian collaborate on some FOSS project like Blender or LibreOffice, they do so in their common tongue, which is English.

      English is now used by a larger percentage of the world's population than any other language. It is used by a much larger absolute number of speakers that ever before. And, do to the influence of all the inputs from other languages, it is evolving faster than any other language has ever done.

      The obdurate francophile who abhors "le hotdog", and "la weekend" has a point: if there is any artistic value in preserving the french language then outlawing foreign words must be done. But some of those francophiles are being purposely blind to the benefits of having a common global language for business and technology. That kind of purposeful bigotry is destructively stupid.

      (As an aside, the French that is spoken in Quebec is relatively unchanged from the historic French of the 1600s, It is the French language spoken in Paris that has been corrupted over time.)

    64. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The wealthy - the top 10% - overwhelmingly carry the tax burden even though they make a minority of all income. Add in that capital gains taxes and luxury excise taxes are almost exclusively the domain of those top 10%, and they are easily funding more than half of all Government spending - while making less than half of the personal (not including corporate) income. But hey, you keep that income inequality mantra rolling!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    65. Re:... Says the Frenchman by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      German. The language of love if your fetish is hocking up a lung...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    66. Re:... Says the Frenchman by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      It was written in the D programming language, or le systeme D as it's called in France.

    67. Re:... Says the Frenchman by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      They are salty that they are no longer the lingua franca.

      Not nearly as salty as the Italians, who don't even own lingua franca any more.

    68. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      The top 10%'s share of U.S. income is over 50% of total income for the country.
      So, it's logical that they would pay at least 50% of the taxes.

      However, we give $4,000 deduction to everyone (including the top 10%) and a ~$6,600 standard deduction to everyone (more if you can itemize -- which the top 10% can do in abundance).

      So that means the bottom quintile basically pay no federal income tax.

      BUT, they do pay 15% social security tax, and 10% to 12.9% state, local, and excise taxes for a tax of about 25 to 28%.

      The top 10% pay about 3% social security tax (down to under .3% for the top 1%) and 3% in state, local, and excise taxes (under 1% for the top 1%). So their total tax rate is well under that of low and middle income citizens. If we were to put a higher rate on the lower income citizens combined with their higher rate of local taxes and social security, they would literally not have money to eat or house themselves and would probably turn violent as they died of a combination of hunger and starvation.

      And as a result policing and prison expenses (already about $31,000 a year but as high as $100,000 a year in some states) would be even higher.

      So SINCE the deductions we give to everyone have a larger benefit to lower incomes in terms of PERCENTAGE but not DOLLARS, they pay little to no federal income tax.

      But- the very wealthy pay a MUCH lower rate on long term capital gains and often pay no tax at all since the basis is reset on their death. They already pay over a total tax rate 10% lower most people in the 21% to 90% income brackets.

      And you conservative jackwads just voted for a bill to LITERALLY take money from pre-kindergarden children so you could give the top 2% a larger tax cut.

      Way to go- taking food from babies to fund yachts. Conservatives are sociopaths.

      Are you proud of taking money from kids to fund luxury travel and multiple luxury condomiums?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    69. Re:... Says the Frenchman by koavf · · Score: 1

      Your English is very good.

    70. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      The top 10%'s share of U.S. income is over 50% of total income for the country.

      Source? Because the link I provided shows otherwise. And it's taken from 20154 IRS tax returns (most up-to-date data). It shows the top 10% pay 71% of Federal income tax, but make about 47% of income. This one fallacious claim you started with renders the rest of your post essentially irrelevant.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    71. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Interesting. So does everyone understand italian, does he use a translator, or does no one have a clue what he's talking about?

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    72. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      https://thinkprogress.org/weal...

      The top ten percent of earners in the United States took home more than 50 percent of all income in 2012, the highest amount ever recorded since data was first collected in 1917, according to an updated report from economists Emmanuel Saez and Thomas Piketty.

      While the wealthiest took a big hit during the financial crisis, theyâ(TM)ve almost fully recovered. Last year, income for the top 1 percent of earners âoeincreased sharply,â the report notes, growing by nearly 20 percent, while the bottom 99 percent only saw money rise by 1 percent. âoeIn sum,â the authors write, âoetop 1% incomes are close to full recovery while bottom 99% incomes have hardly started to recover.â

      This follows a trend since the recovery officially began. From 2009 to 2012, income for the 1 percent grew by 31.4 percent, while everyone else only saw it grow by 0.4 percent. That means the 1 percent âoecaptured 95% of the income gains in the first three years of the recovery,â they write.

      http://equitablegrowth.org/res...

      "U.S. top one percent of income earners hit new high in 2015 amid strong economic growth"
      "The top 1 percent income earners in the United States hit a new high last year, according to the latest data from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. The bottom 99 percent of income earners registered the best real income growth (after factoring in inflation) in 17 years, but the top one percent did even better. The latest IRS data show that incomes for the bottom 99 percent of families grew by 3.9 percent over 2014 levels, the best annual growth rate since 1998, but incomes for those families in the top 1 percent of earners grew even faster, by 7.7 percent, over the same period. (See Figure 1.)"

      http://billmoyers.com/2015/01/...

      https://thinkprogress.org/the-...
      Adjusting for inflation and excluding anything made from capital gains investments like stocks, however, shows that even that small gains for all but the richest disappears. According to Justin Wolfers, adjusted average income for the 1 percent without capital gains rose from $871,100 to $968,000 in that time period. For everyone else, average income actually fell from $44,000 to $43,900. Calculated this way, the 1 percent has captured all of the income gains.

      Saezâ(TM)s new data show that income for the 1 percent did actually decrease somewhat in 2013 as compared to 2012: its share of income fell from 22.8 percent to 20.1 percent.

      Note: The top 1% alone earned 20% of the entire nation's income. It's easy to hit 50% when you go to the top 10%.

      here's updated 2015 data...
      https://taxfoundation.org/summ...
      Top 10% 45.87% of the total income.

      The ENTIRE bottom 50% earned only 11.49% of the entire nation's income.

      If you allow any kind of deductions at all, their taxes are going to be much lower because even tiny deductions are a huge portion of their income. But worst case, let them starve- the most they could pay would be 11.49%.

      But given the crippling size of state and local taxes combined with social security taxes, many would starve and go homeless.

      Here's a state by state breakdown of how much people pay in state, local, and excise taxes .

      http://www.itep.org/whopays/fu...

      Excise taxes are things like $2 on your cell phone bill and $70 a year for your car. Likewise, the poorest get no share of pr

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    73. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Yes, cooked numbers and adding things in that apply to everyone. You do know the rich pay FICA and excise taxes and capital gains taxes and do not qualify for most of those exemptions that go to lower income people? The raw data says you're full of BS - it's only when you make "buts" and "ifs" and "estimates" that you can skew things the other way. The facts are: the rich pay the overwhelming amount of taxes in the US, and it is much higher than their share of income.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    74. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Lets be clear. More people will be able to speak English than any other language. Therefore, it will be the most commonly spoken language.

    75. Re:... Says the Frenchman by mfearby · · Score: 1

      When English loses world importance you will be seeing Brits and Americans becoming chauvinistic about the language as well.

      English is the ultimate universal language (apart from its unfortunate spelling and being difficult to learn) because it borrows words from other languages all the time. From wikipedia:

      According to one study, the percentage of modern English words derived from each language group are as follows:
      Latin (including words used only in scientific / medical / legal contexts): ~29%
      French: ~29%
      Germanic: ~26%
      Others: ~16%

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      I don't imagine English speakers will become chauvinistic if/when the language is no longer that important; it'll just keep borrowing words as necessary.

    76. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      That's not quite how it works at all; Latin was a dead language--meaning no native speakers anymore--for most of its importance as a common language for international communications, which should be a big hint that the number of native speakers and their economic importance has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with a language getting the job.

      French got popular because it was fashionable among the elites and used for international diplomacy. It fell out of use because...well...fashionable ought to be a hint, and France also pretty much screwed itself over on the 'international diplomacy' front. (See: French history.)

      German fell out of use in science because WWI, WWII, and the fact that a rather stunningly large number of people for some reason just decided they really didn't want to be Germans and left. (See: World history.)

      At this point it's probably more likely than not that English would actually go the way of Latin--it'll stay important for a significant period of time even if all English-speaking countries suddenly disappeared tomorrow, because so many people have it as a second language. It's somewhat easier than switching to Mandarin--English may be one of the hardest languages to learn, but unless your native tongue is tonal then the difficulties in English will definitely hit a lot farther into learning it than they will with learning Mandarin. Spanish...well, the different versions are generally mutually intelligible right now, but...

      Though, really, if we're going by the largest population in the EU should be setting the importance of a language to the EU, I'd think then that Arabic would be hands-down the most important one by now.

    77. Re:... Says the Frenchman by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      Because you like the name of the introductory course, of course: Beginning Finnish.

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    78. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Unlikely, that. One of the acid tests for translation is to have them translate a text, producing a smooth translation, and then you hand their work to another translator to translate back, blindly of course. The back translation, if the initial translation is good, should be close to the original text--it doesn't need to be the same words, but you certainly should have the same 'sense' to it.

      Mechanical translators are not really close to passing that test on a reliable basis, and computers may well need to be capable of reliably & accurately taking instructions in natural languages to reach that point. From experience, though, picking a language everybody in the group knows is likely to be the preference offline--they might be used to help close gaps in vocabulary and understanding of idiomatic language, but they'd be more annoying trouble in conversation than even the most mangled common tongue.

    79. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by Shalhav · · Score: 1

      French words are one thing to learn; French idioms another. Is grenouille, literally frog in English, used in another sense here, or a quote from some metaphor?

    80. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Read the who pays.

      $2 excise tax is a lot of money when you make $8 per hour.

      It is almost nothing when you make $100 per hour.

      And sales tax is highly regressive since the poor spend everything they make but the wealthy do not or they find ways to avoid some or all of the taxes.

      Read the who pays analysis. Understand what a high share of their income the poor pay for social security and state, local and excise taxes.

      Try to tell me how someone who makes $16,000 a year is going to survive if you take half of their income in social security, sales tax, state and local taxes and then add on federal income taxes which we currently excuse them from.

      If we are going to do this, we should raise state taxes to take the same share of the wealthy's money that it takes from the middle income and the poor.

      The math doesn't support your position and the included IRS data does support mine.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    81. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      And your response to data is this unsourced bullshit backed up by your ignorant opinions?

      You are the type of person who votes to take away food from hungry pre-schoolers to give a larger tax break to yourself and then goes and has a kegger to celebrate doing so.

      Which the republicans actually did. What asshats.

      I don't see how christians can associate with this party other than the abortion issue.

      Once abortion is outlawed, I suspect their tie to the republican party will evaporate if their souls and doctrine haven't been completely corrupted.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    82. Re:... Says the Frenchman by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      In that situations most people half assed understood it, or one gave a quick summary.
      Myself I was only involved in such a situation twice I think. But my friends tell me the same stories.

      I do a lot of Aikido, visiting seminars in south France, Switzerland, Lichtenstein etc. where Italians show up often. As soon as you get into a talk with them the first minutes they only talk Italian until they grudgingly accept that you don't speak the language. Very fascinating "syndrome".

      A friend of mine does Aikido, too. He is from Catalonia, Catalan is a rough mixture between French, "Spanish" and Occitan. On an Aikido seminar they where sitting outside of the Bread&Breakfast drinking some wine and having a barbecue. My friend plays Guitar, so they had some music.

      Suddenly an Italian from a hotel across the street showed up. He sat by them, started to talk to them, later sung with them, took over the show completely. Was great fun. But the point is: he constantly only spoke Italian. And while the languages all come from latin, modern Italian and Catalan are quite different languages.

      My friend said it was one of the most funny experiences.

      I mean: I would be to shy to approach a party of singing people, which I don't know, in a foreign country and just sit down and start singing, in my own language, mind you.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    83. Re:... Says the Frenchman by syntotic · · Score: 1

      Naw, they are under the delusion that other languages are most extensive because of teh voices they hear in their heads, they think it is French but most likely it is some Arab or other. Same happens in Italian, you can LIVE them here thinking a priest is *talking* to them and then they fall into a spree of Islamic thinking and ideas. Or maybe they are hearing a lot of Spanish, as English would not go through in schizophrenia (different language root, syntax, etc.), though unlikely in Europe, they must be getting any number of Arabs and Africans in French. Not the first time Antiquity World organizes an European war through schizophrenia. The web is enough to give importance to English as there is a LOT of new literature in it in English, (and of course compared to the facilities to SEEK information in electronic means it is hard to compete out of them, or plain dumb and retrograde for that matter). Now, if Chinese starts taking out... or supplanting English, then it can become a real punch, just try to read Chinese translated into Egnli sh. But it is still moving a few millions from a high inertia track (with the exception of schizophrenics who end up imbued by any number of languages, even personal ones, and become incoherent). If the man is schizophrenic he MAY be *hearing* even English speakers in French, as schizophrenia goes.

    84. Re: ... Says the Frenchman by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Who pays more in taxes than their share of the income? Case closed. Push your class warfare BS elsewhere...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    85. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Kabukiwookie · · Score: 1

      / ironically, many "American" words that British people hate on, originated in Britain, they just fell out of common usage in Britain for a while.

      Really? Which words would that be? Defense? Which comes from the english 'defence', which has the base word 'fence' in it, a word which in itself is still written the same way in US english strangely. Maybe 'organize' (or any other verb that uses a 'z' instead of an 's', even though when pronouncing it, one can actually hear an 's' sound, instead of a 'z' sound. Or maybe 'color', where again, one can actually hear the 'ou', instead of the short 'o', when the word 'colour' is pronounced.

      It seems that a lot of americanisms are just lazy use of english and poor spelling really, which have somehow become the default way to write things in the US.

      --
      The mountains of madness have many little plateaus of sanity - Terry Pratchett.
    86. Re:... Says the Frenchman by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Of course someone who speaks French thinks English is "losing importance." They've been asserting that for decades now, because they are delusional. Anybody who ever has needed to deal with software written in France by French companies knows just how arrogant they are about speaking and writing French and only French, even if it means inconveniencing literally everyone else around them.

      I'm a Canadian. English is the language of 9 provinces and French is in the tenth. We teach the second language in all provinces, and including in some regions the Indigenous languages too.
      I learned French beginning at age 50. I learned Spanish concurrently. I am not gifted in languages, but I do find that in the middle east, and Africa, French is the dominant second language.

      Advantages I gained from learning the other two are a) understanding the Non-American culture and the brain's thought processes, an understanding of the other romantic languages, and a much greater English vocabulary. I am much better for it. By the way, my brain is wired to do math and programming. It took me a few months to be able to speak as an immigrant but 3 years to become proficient in French, with reading and writing.

      When I watch CNN or other stations, where they interview the man on the street, I am shocked at the poor level of speaking. I am gonna go now.

       

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    87. Re:... Says the Frenchman by Vuil · · Score: 1

      Of course someone who speaks French thinks English is "losing importance." They've been asserting that for decades now, because they are delusional. Anybody who ever has needed to deal with software written in France by French companies knows just how arrogant they are about speaking and writing French and only French, even if it means inconveniencing literally everyone else around them.

      Same nonsense in Quebec. I worked with Quebec software people. They thought their software was better, they were better educated, they were more intelligent, they had more understanding of technology, they had better software methodologies, French was better at capturing requirements, they were - well - just better .........it is a Gallic quirk. Not to be taken seriously.

    88. Re:... Says the Frenchman by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Healthier? Gesundheit!

    89. Re:... Says the Frenchman by mcswell · · Score: 1

      "There even are places where English completely disappears. In America, they haven't used it for years."
      --Prof. Henry Higgins

      (http://www.musictory.it/musica/Rex+Harrison/Why+Can%27t+The+English%3F)

    90. Re:... Says the Frenchman by mcswell · · Score: 1

      That's because you (and I) belong to those hoi poloi, whereas they belong to the o oo.

      Well, that fell flat. When I previewed the above, the Greek letters in the last two words went away (leaving the 'o', which are visually identical to the omicron). As someone has remarked in his sig line, \. just doesn't do Unicode. For the record, the words are (rough breathing) omicron iota, pi omicron lambda omicron iota.

    91. Re:... Says the Frenchman by mcswell · · Score: 1

      "Languages that require non-ascii characters have been tried": In case anyone is interested, one of these was APL (at least in some versions).

    92. Re:... Says the Frenchman by i_ate_god · · Score: 1

      ben ouais ostie!

      Take a catholic word, say it in french angrily, and now you're swearing Quebecois.

      The nice thing about it is that TABARNAK is a far more satisfying swear than FUCK. Try it next time you stub your toe.

      --
      I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
  2. what a moron... by ole_timer · · Score: 1

    english is waning...you go right ahead and believe that

    --
    nothing to see here - move along
    1. Re:what a moron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A Spanish friend of mine wants me to move out to Spain and I'd mentioned one fear was an inability to find work and she was saying I had nothing to worry about because if all else failed, I could teach English lessons because there's a huge demand for native English speakers to teach advanced English. And Spain is classically one of the least willing to learn English because of the wide spread use of Spanish internationally.

      Yeah, having a hard time believing the guy. Probably more of a politically motivated jab at Brexit.

    2. Re:what a moron... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      The business community does.

    3. Re:what a moron... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 5, Insightful

      english is waning...you go right ahead and believe that

      This may be true one day. But my money would be on Chinese, not French, as the successor.

    4. Re:what a moron... by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      It is not the "only" important language, no, of course not. French is important, as is German and Russian. You can make cases or Arabic and Spanish, as well. English is, however, the *most* important language.

    5. Re:what a moron... by omnichad · · Score: 1

      The ones that don't speak Mandarin.

    6. Re:what a moron... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Even people so stupid they can't tell the difference between "is not decreasing in use" and "is the only important thing" realize they better learn a few words of it, eh?

      Baka baka baka sou da ne?

    7. Re:what a moron... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Have you checked out the lousy pay for TESL (Teaching English as a Second Language)? In many cases. it's room and board, and pocket money. People do it when they want to get a "free" experience of living in another country.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    8. Re:what a moron... by guyniraxn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've traveled to Taiwan for work five times in the past year, no one expects me to know a word of Mandarin. We're still years away from that becoming a reality.

    9. Re:what a moron... by nucrash · · Score: 1

      With India being the most populous English speaking country in the world, I am thinking English will continue to be somewhat relevant. I do believe the speak is correct in that English is waning. US is in decline and as long as India doesn't get their affairs in order, Mandarin and simplified Chinese are going to be the next languages of choice.

      The UK decided nationalism is for them which is sad considering at one point in time they were the largest empire not a century ago.

      --
      Place something witty here
    10. Re:what a moron... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Except in the US, where it will be Spanish. Latinos will be bilingual, but most of the rest of the population will be English-only. Makes it easy to have a private conversation in front of unilingual English speakers.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    11. Re:what a moron... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Chinese is too difficult for non-native speakers to ever become a glue language that business people would want to learn to speak to other non-native Chinese speakers. Also, almost all Chinese people speak a second language. Younger people English, older people Russian.

      Spanish or German are the only really viable alternatives to English for that use case in most of the world. And what business uses as a glue language is the one that parents will want children to learn in school.

      Chinese is a useful language to learn, and it is increasingly useful in the world we live in, but that is only for the use case of talking to people in China.

    12. Re:what a moron... by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Arabic, sadly.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    13. Re:what a moron... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But my money would be on Chinese, not French, as the successor.

      My money would be on anything but French as the successor. French has been withering for over a century.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    14. Re:what a moron... by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you have a speech on the importance of the EU and you want to direct it at a French population who are about to go to the polls, and the outcome of those polls could determine the future of the EU, what's more important? That you speak in English or in French?

      Context, it fucking matters.

      He is anything but a moron.

    15. Re:what a moron... by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      You don't become a large empire without believing nationalism is important. Interestingly enough, I think that once the UK leaves, it'll be Germany alone trying to look outside Europe's borders - and they can't carry it alone. More, I think EU will turn completely inward and, for the most part, leave the world stage within 25 years. Tragic.

    16. Re:what a moron... by qaz123 · · Score: 1

      Actually Chinese grammar is simple. It has complex writing system and pronunciation.

    17. Re:what a moron... by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Given that the largest population of English speaking folks is now in India, the Indian accent will eventually become the standard and American accents will be considered quaint like the British accent is considered nowadays.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    18. Re:what a moron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you believe that.... Some of us white anglo looking folks running around the USA DO understand Spanish.... And yes, I've overheard some of your conversations you thought where private...

      Personally, I consider it rude to choose to speak in a language to obscure your conversation from those around you and try not to do that when I can, but again, I suppose that's not a typical white anglo's attitude either..

    19. Re: what a moron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If there's one lesson to learn from the US history of immigration, it's that by the third generation nobody is going to be speaking Spanish in a significant capacity.

      After all, we aren't speaking Italian, Polish, Yiddish, or German. We're speaking English.

    20. Re:what a moron... by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      If the Latinos are bilingual and most of the rest of the population speaks English... then English is still the dominant language.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    21. Re:what a moron... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You should have seen the girls who thought they could have a private conversation in Hindi turn red. I didn't know any Hindi. It didn't matter. I picked up the conversation thread and jumped in (in English) after they had dug deep enough.

    22. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Chinese like most asian languages, is one of the most simplest languages in the world, only topped by Korean and Japanes which are even simpler.

      You are probaly scared by writing with Kanji, but when you get used to it, it is not that complicated either.

      How hard can it be to learn a language, where every word is just one or two sillabels, which has no gender and only one or two times, no singular, nor plural? Wich basically has nothing like complicated European languages?

      You think a japanese or chinese speaks bad english because they are to dumb? English, probably the simplest european language, at least for 'germanic' nations, is ten times more difficult than Chinese or Thai, Korean or Japanese.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    23. Re:what a moron... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      When people make the effort to learn a second language, English is still the most popular choice by a huge margin, beating the #2 choice by a factor 2

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    24. Re:what a moron... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      My money is on a billion native speakers, and, if they can get rid of their oppressive and evil government, a tremendous business and manufacturing powerhouse that will fuel and even more significant R&D. The US will never be able to compete with that, particularly as we're on the road to stagnation (while assiduously stating that our policies are to prevent it!). That sort of power could drive change, but they are held back by a huge boat-anchor. I suspect their business leaders will eventually realize this and divest themselves of it, one way or another, and our grandkids will learn Chinese in school alongside whatever their native language is.

      Yes, I know it's a difficult language to learn, but I don't imagine any of us will start speaking it suddenly or even in our lifetimes. English didn't become widely spoken overnight, it took a long time to replace French, and neither will it's successor.

      Spanish would be my second pick, it has a huge speaker base and relatively logical (if not simple) grammar. But it has the problem that most countries that speak it are poor and mostly irrelevant on the world stage, with no evidence of that changing any time soon. Without that, it's like the various dialects in India - a lot of speakers, but they tend to speak only to each other casually, but speak other languages professionally. German has wealth and power behind it, but even if you sum up all the similar languages spoken in northern europe, doesn't really have much of a speaker base, and it's not clear that they can prop up the rest of Europe forever.

    25. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Depends on the country.
      In Thailand it is a high honoured skill/job. In relation to other jobs, you nearly can earn a fortune. You easily earn twice as much as you need for a month, with a half time job. Having a visa and a work permit as a teacher is no problem at all.
      Basically every school that gives you a certification also guarantees a job afterwards.
      However the Thai are very special:887 they value after work education, further qualifications etc. very very high and are ready to pay absurd prices.
      E.g. a 12 weekends Thai massage course costs about 3 monthly wages.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    26. Re: what a moron... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Go to Little Italy in a city near you. Or Chinatown. Or parts of New York. Or Amish country. Or, if you're lazy, just watch Bladerunner. Languages have this nasty habit of hanging around as a way to preserve culture among minority groups.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    27. Re:what a moron... by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Not when most of the population is of Latino descent and can speak both languages. It can happen, given enough time. Most of the population here speaks English, but the predominant language is French.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    28. Re:what a moron... by slew · · Score: 2

      If you have a speech on the importance of the EU and you want to direct it at a French population who are about to go to the polls, and the outcome of those polls could determine the future of the EU, what's more important? That you speak in English or in French?

      Context, it fucking matters.

      He is anything but a moron.

      Well, another observation is that he might simply pandering to the increased sense of *nationalism* that every country seems to be experiencing these days.

      In politics, flattery will get you everywhere and tamping down any chance of a Frexit is probably Juncker's number one goal...

      Of course he isn't a moron, he is a politician which requires the talent to be able to speak out of all sides of one's mouth...

    29. Re:what a moron... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      The ones that don't speak Mandarin.

      English is taught in Chinese schools starting in 3rd grade. Most urban young people can understand basic written English, and many of them speak it fluently. Most Chinese businesses have English speakers on their staff, and have little difficulty dealing with English speaking clients and customers.

      Other European languages are far less common. I have met Russian speakers in Dongbei, and Portuguese speakers in Guangdong. But those are spoken for regional and historic reasons that are fading away, similarly to the way many elderly people in Liaoning still understand Japanese.

      French is pretty much nonexistent. Even if you go to a French restaurant, nobody there speaks French.

    30. Re:what a moron... by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      There are a few reasons why Mandarin will not replace English as the "international" language. Mandarin is a tonal language, which makes it much harder to learn, because the tone in which you speak changes the actual meanings of words (in Mandarin there are 4 tones and one neutral tone). In a non-tonal language (e.g. English), while you might determine the emotional state of the speaker through tone, the meanings of the words spoken do not change.

      Think about how broken someone's English can be and yet still be understood. Even with an incredibly thick and obnoxious French accent, a fluent English speaker will still be able to understand them. This is far less true in tonal languages.

      Then, of course, there is the written language. English, being a phonetic language, means that all words are comprised of the same 26 characters. Even if you come across a completely new word, you can determine pronunciation fairly easily, and depending on the word you may even be able to determine meaning (root word + suffix/prefix etc.). Even if the word is misspelled, communication is still possible (i.e. phonetic languages have parity, in a way). However in Mandarin there are thousands of different characters, and slight variations in how they are written (or maybe drawn?) completely change the meaning. Even for native speakers, it takes years and years of study to master writing and reading in Mandarin.

      For fast and effective communication, especially between speakers of different fluency, phonetic/non-tonal languages are the way to go, and Mandarin is neither of these.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    31. Re:what a moron... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Not when most of the population is of Latino descent and can speak both languages. It can happen, given enough time. Most of the population here speaks English, but the predominant language is French.

      As a Latino, I tell you: no, it won't happen. 3rd, 4th generation will speak English only (just like anyone else.) And it's not like we have to wait to see it happen. Latinos have been in the continental US for centuries, and this is always the outcome. Seriously, find me a neighborhood, barrio, town or city were 3rd, 4th generation Latinos speak Spanish as their primary language (if they speak it at all.)

    32. Re:what a moron... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      You can call it simple, but it isn't, really. You could also deny that it's a single language...and that's "sort of" correct. Mandarin and Cantonese aren't *that* different. The problem, traditionally, is that because it was a tonal language, different villages could be mutually unintelligible. Tonal languages are subject to strong pressures for variation as different people have difficult in speaking, or hearing different tones. So there is a quick separation as different populations learn from different speakers. Note that the grammar and vocabulary would remain the same, so a non-phonetic writing system could be universal.

      Well, I said that was the traditional problem. I have a rather strong suspicion that radio and television have exerted a strong homogenizing effect, so that everyone now learns the tones of the Chinese equivalent of BBC English. So the language is probably becoming much more uniform. (This is a hypothesis, as all of my information is from older sources. Perhaps someone else will affirm or deny it?)

      In a way it's like asking "What's the simplest computer language?". (And assembler doesn't count.) You *could* say, and defend, that Forth or Lisp* were the simplest language. Or that C was. Or even that Ada was. It all depends on exactly how you're looking at "simple".

      * Not Common Lisp, but Lisp 1.5, before it started adding complexities into the language.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    33. Re:what a moron... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      No. French was not the reason for "SOS" (no periods!). French was the reason for "Mayday" (the French phrase was "m'aider", a shortened version of "venez m'aider" [meaning "come and help me"]). (Thanks, Google)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    34. Re:what a moron... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      You should consider the sad history of the Bablefish.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    35. Re:what a moron... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and just imagine the size of the keyboard needed for all those characters!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    36. Re:what a moron... by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Chinese like most asian languages, is one of the most simplest languages in the world, only topped by Korean and Japanes which are even simpler.

      You are probaly scared by writing with Kanji, but when you get used to it, it is not that complicated either.

      How hard can it be to learn a language, where every word is just one or two sillabels, which has no gender and only one or two times, no singular, nor plural? Wich basically has nothing like complicated European languages?

      You think a japanese or chinese speaks bad english because they are to dumb? English, probably the simplest european language, at least for 'germanic' nations, is ten times more difficult than Chinese or Thai, Korean or Japanese.

      I speak Spanish (my mother language) and English (my second language for the last 28 years.) I speak some Japanese, which thank God for me is non-tonal.

      I've been exposed to Chinese (Mandarin and Cantonese) as well as Vietnamese which are tonal. I can't for the life of me I cannot pick up the tones and stresses. I cannot distinguish most tones in Mandarin, let alone reproduce them. First tone? Rising tone? Falling tone? Falling/Raising tone? No way! Cantonese is more complicated, and Vietnamese even more.

      Grammatically they might be simpler, but the tone system is quite a challenge. So there are a lot of reasons why learning a language is difficult.

      For "Anglos" the difficulty of learning Spanish lies not on pronunciation, but on the irregularity of our verbs combined with the multitude of testes, each with their own set of modalities. For us native Spanish speakers, the challenge of learning English is in with phonics, the much richer sound system forced into an ambiguous alphabet.

      For me, Japanese has been a bit of a challenge because of the vocabulary and some of the conjugation forms. I don't think any of these pose the same challenge Chinese tones pose for me.

    37. Re:what a moron... by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      I am considering the number of speakers to be the metric, not whether they use that language the most. The set of people who speak English is larger than the set of people who speak any other language.

      It doesn't matter if most of those people speak something else most of the time, because we are talking about whether English will be replaced as the so-called "international" language. To me (you may disagree), this means answering the following question: what language will 2 people with different native tongues most likely communicate with? The answer to that, in your scenario, is still English.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    38. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1


      English, being a phonetic language, means that all words are comprised of the same 26 characters. Even if you come across a completely new word, you can determine pronunciation fairly easily,

      No idea whst you mean with 'phonetic'. However your idea that you can determine pronounciation from the writing is completely wrong, even idiotic.
      a) idea, pronounces the first i as ey as the word 'I'
      b) idiotic, pronounces the first i es ee like in the word see

      For a non english, learning the english writing of the words is as hell as learning Thai writing.
      26 letters are not enough to write english. But at the time the writing was established, people where to dumb to invent new letters (or keep the few they invented) .

      You are 'complaining' about asian languages often being tonal. However likewise the non english natives bitch about, were, where, we're etc. I guess there are people here/hear that have better examples. People ... should be spelled peeple. Because that is how the pronounciation sounds to me.

      Regarding latin letters, english has the most complicated spelling/pronounciation in the world. Even Tagalog is joke easy, because the use a, e, i, o, u like any other european language, except english and partly frensh.

      Why you write e.g. 'look' instead of 'luk' is beyond me ... oh, the spelling for 'luk' is to close to 'luck'? But 'luck' should actually be spelled 'lack' and 'lack' should be spelled 'laeck' or with a german or norwegian like a-umlaut.

      In other words: english is an easy to learn language, grammar wise and vocabulary wise, for an european! Because most european languages share a part of the vocabulary and have similar grammars.

      However the writing system with the purely fitting (oh, did I write purely wrong, well it is not red underlined) 26 letters is anything close to 'phonetic' ... learn Japanese, or Italian, or German: those write _exactly_ es you speak it. With a few exceptions or rules in german, e.g when to insert an 'h'. Ah, and Finnish comes to mind.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    39. Re:what a moron... by Plus1Entropy · · Score: 1

      Apparently there are a few different designs to deal with that. One of the most common is to simply type the "Pinyin" (Mandarin transliterated using the Latin alphabet), which is then interpreted by software to generate the correct characters.

      I think that demonstrates my point pretty well.

      --
      Only crack the nuts that crack. You don't put the ones that don't crack in the sack.
    40. Re:what a moron... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of all this, my wife is Chinese (native speaker). I don't think I'm talking about adults learning anything, I'm talking about what our kids and their kids will learn in school alongside their native tongue, and use in business. I will probably never speak another language well. However tonality is not an impediment, much as I can with English speakers, I can understand both her emotional state, and the relationship of the person she is speaking to on the phone when she speaks her native language, just by listening (i.e. no body language clues). Tonality is part of their diction, but it exists in all languages to some degree or another. I can change the meaning of a sentence just by pitching my voice, I cannot do it in writing, but I can do it while speaking. They also can use that same tonality to imply sarcasm, or whatever they want, all while speaking the phonemes required to be understood. I've always thought of it as amplitude modulation: sending music or meaning on a carrier wave, except that the carrier wave changes too to modify the speech.

      There are numerous different ways of using phonetic Chinese, I'm not an expert on any of them. They already learn them in school in China, and I am under the impression that it's part of how they type Chinese characters since their keyboards do not have tens of thousands of characters either. They simply do not use the phonetic language as their written medium. And it's possible that changes over time too, I predict some bastardization if indeed the language becomes dominant. Already native Chinese speakers use english words for certain things, even when Chinese words exist to express that identical idea, much as English took in a number of French words.

    41. Re:what a moron... by gmack · · Score: 1

      That was my experience living in Spain, all of the English teachers I knew were paid very little and the job basically provided food and a place to stay so their savings would go father when traveling in Europe. I never understood how they could live on what they got, thankfully as a tech worker I didn't have to.

      It is different for Asia though, they actually pay their teachers properly.

    42. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The main reason that people have problems with tonal languages is that they feel silly to try to reproduce the tones.
      In other words when you are suposed to make a high tone, you semiconsciously make a middle high tone.
      When you are supposed to make a rising tone, you make a high tone.

      To learn in a professional school they usualy have band machines which overemphasize the tones of the language, that makes it essier to hear them. But actually, in an intensive course, e.g. 3 month in the country, or even simply watching youtube videos will change that quickly.

      The real trick however is to approach it like an actor on stage. That is true for every language, but I learned that only after I was already 40, so to late for my english :) Actor on stage means: like in a song, you do your best to mimic how a native person in that 'role' would talk. If you try to learn british english you take a book like 'Pride and Prejudice' and try to speak loe one of the protagonists in the movies. You don't simply try to 'just say the words' as you can, you try to imitate the sound, the tones etc. the emotions.

      The same in dancing or martial arts. Bad dancers and slow learners suffer from the subconscious believe that they look like a poser (bragging), if they do it properly. So they do it awkwardly.

      You can not learn to handle a sword without pretending to be a Knight or Samurai, and posing (in the sense of posing in front of a camera) in the way how a Samurai or Knight would move.

      If Chinese had a simple western or similar to Korean writing system, it definitely would be one of the simplest languages on the planet. You only need to learn the vocabulary ... no real grammar ... thats it (yes I simplify).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    43. Re:what a moron... by gmack · · Score: 1

      A Spanish friend of mine wants me to move out to Spain and I'd mentioned one fear was an inability to find work and she was saying I had nothing to worry about because if all else failed, I could teach English lessons because there's a huge demand for native English speakers to teach advanced English. And Spain is classically one of the least willing to learn English because of the wide spread use of Spanish internationally.

      I've lived there but I was brought into the country for a specific task and when that job went away, there was no replacement. The economy of Spain is still in a bad state so many of the people with marketable skills and who know other languages are moving away from Spain. I've known some tech workers who tried to find work in Spain fail.

      The exception of course, is if you want to work some place like Malaga where more people speak English than Spanish but then you can count on waiting tables

      Also, most Spanish adults don't speak other languages because they were never taught, the kids on the other hand, often speak English perfectly.

    44. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Mandarin is since decades the only official language. Obviously China still has its hundreds of local languages. Some would call Mandarin high Chinese. I don't agree with your idea that the tone would change from region to region, in Mandarin. Mandarin and Cantonese are actually quite different, probably only 50% common words, and Cantonese has one tone more, or was it even two?

      In a way it's like asking "What's the simplest computer language?".
      Actually not.

      I go into the cinema now. School english: I'm going into the cinema now.
      I go into the cinema tomorrow. School english: I will be going into the cinema tomorrow.
      We go into the cinema tomorrow. School english: We are going into the cinema tomorrow,

      Not sure if my school english examples are fully correct. Anyway, I badly translate now Chinese into english:

      I go cinema
      tomorrow I go cinema
      tomorrow we go cinema

      No 'going', no 'are' no 'will'. Chinese is a 'baby' language. Most asian languages are in one sense or the other, baby languages.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    45. Re:what a moron... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Except that that's not the native language of most Indian speakers, except Anglo-Indians, or descendants of Brits who remained in India after 1947. The reason that English is an official language there is that the Indian linguistic population is pretty fragmented, w/ the south being pretty hostile to the idea of Hindi being the official language.

    46. Re:what a moron... by blindseer · · Score: 1

      My bet is on English being the primary language but all the curse words will be in Chinese.

      I think I saw this in a TV show once.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    47. Re:what a moron... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      the irregularity of our verbs combined with the multitude of testes

      Indeed. When I speak Spanish people often say it's a load of bollocks.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    48. Re:what a moron... by jaklode · · Score: 1

      Really, you go "into" the cinema? I was under the impression you go "to" the cinema?

    49. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      SOS comes from Morse alphabet. ...
      --- ...

      Because for its unique pattern. Later the term 'save our souls' was coined to make it easier for the kids to remember those three letters.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    50. Re:what a moron... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They learn English starting in elementary school.

      It does not matter how many of them there are, it is not relevant. If other people learn Chinese is up to those other people, not to China.

      Perceived "stagnation" of American business is not going to stop Germans from using English to talk to engineers in China. Events in America are not going to give a difficult non-phonetic writing system any sort of comparative advantage compared to languages that use writing systems based on Latin. It doesn't matter how awesome they are, they're going to have to use a different language to communicate with other people who are less awesome.

      Spanish seems like a good choice, but it turns out few people speak it. It is the most useful second language for Americans, but the list of places that speak it is mostly a list of small countries in one region. Portuguese is more likely, because Brazil is big enough to become a world power. But that would have to happen first.

      Swahili is probably more likely than either of those IMO. It is written with a Latin alphabet, it is spoken across a wide region by a lot of people, and adults successfully learn the basics in a short amount of time.

    51. Re:what a moron... by cgriffiths · · Score: 1

      26 letters are not enough to write english.

      26 can be enough with a decent system of orthography which English lacks. Welsh for instance uses 29 letters and is purely phonetic, there are no exceptions to how you read letters. Stress is the only thing which changes the sound of a letter and the stress nearly always falls on the penultimate syllable unless marked by a diacritic. For instance the word 'caniatáu' is stressed on the 'áu' rather than the -iat- as would normally be expected.

      Why you write e.g. 'look' instead of 'luk' is beyond me ... oh, the spelling for 'luk' is to close to 'luck'? But 'luck' should actually be spelled 'lack' and 'lack' should be spelled 'laeck' or with a german or norwegian like a-umlaut.

      'oo' in English is a grapheme, this means that it is a letter or group of letters which express a particular sound or phoneme. Even with a purely phonological orthography graphemes can still exist. However I am a little confused as to why you think that luck should be spelt as 'lack'. Luck in my dialect at least is the 'u' sound as "huh" and not "hah". 'u' is the defacto vowel for this sound as seen in: up, huh, luck, stuck, fuck, pub, dumb, fun etc.

    52. Re:what a moron... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      I recommending thinking less, and reading more. It may be that there are millions of people in the world studying language and education and there just might be extant experiential data on the difficulty of learning various popular languages.

      Thai of course is very difficult because the writing system is obfuscated Sanskrit. Any language designed to be unintelligible to people in neighboring countries with similar spoken language is going to be a real bear. Thai people with poor English can often read English faster than Thai!

    53. Re:what a moron... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Well, I thought he meant he was starting a new job as an actor.

      Luckily he is here to correct me in my understanding of how easy or difficult it is to convey information in various languages.

      Like Larry Wall said,

      "I started trying to teach myself Japanese about 10 years ago, and I could speak it quite well, because of my phonology and phonetics training – but it’s very hard for me to understand what anybody says. So I can go to Japan and ask for directions, but I can’t really understand the answers!"

    54. Re:what a moron... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well, another observation is that he might simply pandering to the increased sense of *nationalism* that every country seems to be experiencing these days.

      Could be but:

      1. Occam's Razor would say the current EU leader has a vested interest in addressing the people who decide tomorrow whether the EU will stick together.
      2. Nationalism would make him speak Luxembourgish rather than French.
      3. He's speaking out against nationalism in France.
      4. He is a Libertarian.

    55. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      There are also millions of people who show the establishment how to teach languages so that the students learn it quickly.
      The internet is full with 'learn any language fluently in three month'.
      The Thai script is very very remotely inspired by Sanscrit.

      At the time it was 'invented' it was a kind of hobby of princes or kings to invent new scripts.
      I find Thai funny, e.g. every letter has a proper name. They don't need a radio alphabet to spell out a word with single letters. The inventor took care of it already.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    56. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      The u in luck does not sound like an u but more like a bastard mixture between an a and an u (considering Latin/German/Italian/Finnish/Japanese sound of an u) pretty close to an a for me.
      All the examples you gave tend into the same direction.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    57. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, in German you say 'into'.
      I try to remember your suggestion!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    58. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That is no wonder.
      Larry Wall is an American.
      He is not able to correlate the sounds he hears to what he thinks how a Kana is actually pronounced.
      If he was a self taught Finn, German or Italian he had no trouble at all to understand it.

      And, Larry Wall is a linguist. He claims many decisions in PERL, at least till PERL 4, are based on linguistic 'principles' unfortunately plenty of people don't grasp his thinking.

      Just listen to an Italian opera, they only have 5 clear vovels. A, e, I, o, u. And in jap. they are pronounced like in Italian, not like in American English.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    59. Re:what a moron... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Hi there, I lived in Shanghai for 6 years, and have been doing business and extensive (30%+ annually) here for the last 15 years (currently in Guangzhou). I've never had a situation where I couldn't do business in English. Yes, I speak Mandarin - but that makes it easy at the shops, small restaurants, and grocery stores. Or on production lines. But business? If da laoban doesn't speak English, most assuredly his trusted associate does and business is conducted that way. Oh, and just to seal it - English education has basically been mandatory in China for the last 30 years - at least 3 years in elementary (and often 2 years in secondary) school. More people speak English in China than reside in Western Europe.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    60. Re:what a moron... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Listen to how a person from Shanghai and a person from Shenzhen both say "thank you". The person from Shenzhen will think the Shanghainese is saying "ten ten" and the Shanghainese will think the Shenzhen folk is saying "four four" very poorly. Local accents seriously damage the universality of a tonal language. Mandarin or not - it is harder for me to be understood in Guangzhou than in Shanghai (I learned Mandarin in Shanghai) - because of my accent.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    61. Re:what a moron... by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it's not because he's right on this matter that he isn't a moron.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    62. Re:what a moron... by cgriffiths · · Score: 1

      Interesting perspective, after doing some reading on the sound it turns out that you are correct for the majority of English speaker pronunciation.

      In reference to German, my English dialect pronounces the 'u' in the same way as 'e' in the standard German 'bitte' or the 'er' in a southern German pronunciation of 'oder'. Never realised that my English neighbours pronounced 'luck' differently but I will admit that an 'ah' sound can be heard in the American pronunciation of "luck".

      Thanks for showing me the differences in pronunciation ;)

    63. Re:what a moron... by ghoul · · Score: 1

      Doesnt really change the fact that the most spoken English Accent is Indian. And that is with only 30% of the population speaking English. As more speak it that accent will become more and more prevalent.

      --
      **Life is too short to be serious**
    64. Re:what a moron... by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      English is considered one of the hardest languages to learn, for much the same reasons Arabic is on that list--it makes a lot of use of idiom and imagery, and English has a significantly large vocabulary because of its tendency to mug languages for spare vocabulary.

      Chinese, Japanese, and Korean are all on that list, too, and not just because of the use of Chinese characters: They all have some degree of tonality, which can literally change the meaning of a word--there's some sentences in Chinese which are the same syllable, repeatedly, with different tones...which make perfect sense if you have the required ear for telling. (If your native language is tonal, it may be easier, but...not necessarily. Also, 'one or two sillabels'? No. I speak two of those languages. I'm not even sure where you're getting the idea that tenses are any simpler--technically maybe, but that's only because they use particles for things most European languages use conjugation and declension to do, and English generally does with word order. Oh, and formal/informal distinctions exist and you can have a level of "More Formal Still" to "Very Close Informal" and using the wrong level with somebody is an insult. Gender also sometimes pops up, though not in the grammatical sense.)

      Japanese and Chinese people's English can be bad because English is a hard, hard language--and, well, there's some distinctions between sounds, such as l & r, that their languages don't make. Learning those is surprisingly hard if you didn't start as an infant, and even then you might have trouble making those sounds yourself.

    65. Re:what a moron... by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      I'm not surprised by 'room and board, and pocket money,' but I'd want to see just how this differs from normal pay for teachers in those countries--both in amounts and local buying power. How much it pays can also change a lot depending on what skills you've got and what precisely you're teaching--in general K12 (or local equivalent) pays the least, if you don't count tutoring in.

      Since I've got degrees from a university in an English-speaking country, I can get myself pretty easily a job teaching English in Japan--don't know about other countries--and I know that at points people have been able to fund going to college in Japan--and attending a place in Tokyo--by teaching English there. YMMV, of course.

    66. Re:what a moron... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Glad that you agree somewhat :D
      Sometimes I have the impression people don't really try to understand/comprehend what I write ... as I'm not a native english speaker ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    67. Re:what a moron... by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      The term is MONOlingual, not unilingual
      So, a field hand can do what most Norte Americanos with baccalaureates cannot
      So who is the stupid one here?

    68. Re:what a moron... by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 1

      "This may be true one day. But my money would be on Chinese, not French, as the successor."

      Not happening. Unless the Indians start ditching English in favor of their dozen and more native languages. Now and in the future, the only ones who'll be using Chinese as more than a diplomatic language will be the peoples of countries with large Chinese majorities like Singapore, Taiwan and of course the PROC. The languages with the greater probability of replacing English will be Spanish or Arabic.

  3. Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect this by evolutionary · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What people may not be aware of, is that computer languages, especially HTML and JavaScript will require people who want to enter the IT field to know at least elementary English. The keywords in HTML tags recognized by all browsers around the word are in English, as is the JavaScript language. While there are some interpreters of compiled languages like C++ in other languages (Chinese for C++ examples exists) the more popular languages have English keyword bases. (see like of non-English based computer languages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...)

    since this is the case, any country wanting "in" on the booming IT industry will have to know some basic English. The English speaking community got the core computer programming/formatting languages out first and as usual, first to publish will have more control it long term.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
  4. In other news... by Jiro · · Score: 4, Funny

    Head of the Corner Burger Stand announces "McDonalds is losing importance."

    1. Re:In other news... by Nutria · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cow says, "eat mor chikin".

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:In other news... by ichthus · · Score: 1

      Mmm. Yes, Cow. Whatever you say. And some waffle fries too, please.

      --
      sig: sauer
  5. English "losing"? by davebarnes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many Chinese speak English compared with Français?
    How many Indians speak English compared with Français?
    How many Japanese speak English compared with Français?

    C’est un homme stupide

    --
    Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
    1. Re:English "losing"? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Arguably more important: what percentage of EU-27 citizens speak French vs English?

    2. Re:English "losing"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > Arguably more important: what percentage of EU-27 citizens speak French vs English?

      Probably more speak French than English, given:

      a) the role of French in diplomacy until some time ago and
      b) the number of languages which are French-related (including the other Latin-based ones).

      Now, frankly, with the only country which speaks a language planning to get out, why would they use said language? For nostalgia?
      Why would anyone elect to use a language if there's no native speaker?

      In Europe, as far as it concerns the European Union, English is over. It's the same idea in Asia (for instance, between China and Japan or China and Russia).

      You had the chance to promote Esperanto and push us into a Star Trek Federation-like future. But you chose to mock Esperanto. Great job!

    3. Re:English "losing"? by Gabest · · Score: 1

      Who cares about French? Russian is the way to go for Europe!

    4. Re:English "losing"? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Far more speak English than French. Far more speak English than German. German and French are almost equal though very differently distributed.

      More speak English than French and German combined.

    5. Re:English "losing"? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Remove the UK, and less than 1% of the remaining EU members have English as their mother tongue.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:English "losing"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And yet, if you go to any country, you'll more likely find someone to speak english with, unlike french and german.

      Yeah, english is not my mother tongue.

    7. Re:English "losing"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The question wasn't " what percentage of EU-27 citizens speak French vs English as their mother tounge". If 10% speak French, and 10% speak German, and 10% speak language x, and 10% speak language y, etc. but 70% of them also speak English, then English matters more as a shared language.

    8. Re:English "losing"? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      The EU is not a country. Inside each country, you most likely will use the language(s) of that country, not English. And in the future, with the ability of apps to translate spoken foreign languages into words you understand, who cares? Babelfish makes language chauvinism irrelevant. The next generation won't need a shared language to communicate.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    9. Re:English "losing"? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The EU contains countries. If a Swiss guy wants to talk to a Greek woman, they do need a common language, which is more likely to be English than German, French, Italian, or Greek.

      Automatic real-time translation of spoken words is a REALLY difficult problem, since it requires actual understanding.

      At one point, I was in charge of internationalizing one of our shop floor apps. I set it all up, and then translated all the English phrases into Japanese. In many cases, I'd type in the English phrase and get several suggestions back, all looking different (I don't read any specifically Japanese script). In order to pick properly, I'd have to understand the English phrase (no problem) and understand the Japanese phrases (problem). I didn't have a better idea for verifying translations than putting them back through Google in the other direction, which (a) I didn't do, and (b) isn't practical for real-time voice translation.

      I was later told, rather gently, that some of my translations had needed to be changed, in a way that sounded like someone was afraid of offending my facility with Japanese. I thought that was pretty funny.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    10. Re:English "losing"? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      How many Chinese speak English compared with Français?

      When I was spending time in Germany, one of the people I talked to a lot wanted to practice his English with me. Why? Because his (German) company outsources production to China, and the language he had in common with their suppliers was, you guessed it, English. Their English was as terrible as his, but they still managed to maintain the relationship.

    11. Re:English "losing"? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Which misses the point. He was taking about the languages used in the EU. With the UK leaving, France and Germany are now picking up things like financial services that are leaving London. This is their moment to grab a huge slice if the pie that the UK is abandoning.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:English "losing"? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Which misses the point. He was taking about the languages used in the EU. With the UK leaving, France and Germany are now picking up things like financial services that are leaving London. This is their moment to grab a huge slice if the pie that the UK is abandoning.

      Which misses the point. He was taking about the languages used in the EU

      No he wasn't. He was talking TO FRANCE. He was talking AT FRANCE. If he was talking to the finance industry he'd be speaking English, not in a language they don't understand.

      Anyway my reply to the GP was not in the context of Junker's message to France, but rather directly to the GP talking about English losing the EU .... even without the UK it will still be a language understood by 220 million more people than French.

    13. Re:English "losing"? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      How many Europeans speak English compared with Français?

      It's more on topic, and yet still on the same point.

      Unfortunately it's not on point in the context of his speech. English is completely irrelevant and losing importance when giving a speech addressing the future of the EU to a French voting bloc that will decide its fate tomorrow.

      Context matters.

  6. Brexit by Tailhook · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Each new day yields another affirmation of the wisdom of UK deplorables.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    1. Re:Brexit by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      How so? Because the head of the EU in a speech addressed directly to French people a day out of an election decided rightfully that speaking in French is far more important to get his point to the right people?

      I'm still keen to hear what wisdom is on offer from a country who by every recent poll quite drastically regrets their knee jerk decision.

    2. Re:Brexit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's election time in the UK, This is an extra election before the start of the brexit negotiations, which is a brilliant move. the UK will start the negotiations with a much broader backing, now the citizens have seen that so far, most brexit results are quite positive, and the EU was wrong on there fud.

      The EU is negotiating with the UK government. It will still be negotiating with the UK government after the election. The idea that the internal UK politcal parties is in some way relevant is just another symptom of the egocentric delusons typical of the Brexit supporter.
      There was to have been a general election in 2020, about when the real effects of Brexit will be obvious.
      calling an electon was just a cynical move to give the tories three more years of power while they try to distance themelves from being the cause of an economic disaster

    3. Re:Brexit by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      as deluded as ever....

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    4. Re:Brexit by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The Brexiteers think that the UK is being insulted when Junker points out that May is delusional. It's not an insult, it's a genuine concern.

      May's negotiating position is entirely unrealistic. She doesn't seem to acknowledge our understand that the EU is in control here. The EU sets the timetable and the agenda. That's how Article 50 works.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Brexit by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If the Brexiteers thought at all there wouldn't have been a Brexit.

    6. Re:Brexit by Kartu · · Score: 1

      Well, Brexit was supposed to be politician vs politician kind of play.
      The guy who pushed for referendum didn't seriously consider the lave option to succeed, as it makes no sense whatsoever.
      It is a lose-lose for UK, as:

      1) Look at Switzerland, they are not part of EU (no veto or any other rights whatsoever) but they do pay quite a lot for being part of the market
      2) Germany and France were pushing for more federalization and UK was the only major player objecting it, now nothing will stop them
      3) Leaving EU market would harm EU but will be much more harmful for UK

      So, UK will either pay the same (if not more, as they had some "discounts" before) and lose veto rights or shoot itself into foot much harder with "hard brexit", which again would play for EU, demonstrating what happens to a country when it does that.

      And to the dude speaking, he clearly said "in EU" and he was correct (in many EU countries people speak more than just English, by the way; Spanish doesn't seem to give a flying fuck about any language and as long as tourists go, German's are the most active ones etc etc)
      It was also before crucial presidential elections, stroking French nationalism a bit.

      All in all, smart move.

  7. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    English is important, but if a language replaces it as a common tongue, it likely won't be a European language. If it shifts, it will be Mandarin/Cantonese, or Arabic. Maybe even Russian.

    If not English, Spanish would be the more logical choice, imho.

  8. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by Nutria · · Score: 1

    Mandarin/Cantonese and Arabic are complicated languages which are wholly unsuited to keyboards.

    And Russian... why in the world would we want to speak Russian?

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  9. Re:German by Nutria · · Score: 1

    Exactly. The "Big Two" European languages are German and French, and Poles, Swedes, Czechs, etc are going to learn German before French...

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  10. To paraphrase: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    EU Leader is Butthurt

  11. He's right? by kamapuaa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well to be fair, England leaving the EU does indeed make English less important in the EU.

    --
    Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    1. Re:He's right? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      LMOL not to people who conduct business.

    2. Re:He's right? by shadowknot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You're perhaps right that it makes English less important in the political side of the EU but, as oh_my_080980980 pints out, English will continue to be the language of communication between those who need a common language in the EU as they're not going to magically cease doing business with British businesses or those affiliated with English speaking organizations. I think we can look at the airlines to disprove this chap's point. If you listen to ATC from anywhere in the world it's in English. An Iranian airline flying through Slovakian airspace will communicate with ATC in English, using feet as a measurement unit for altitude. OK, the point about feet is immaterial but it always used to bug me when the Discovery Channel replaced the original narration and translated aircraft altitude into meters, smacked of ignorance and assumption to me.

    3. Re:He's right? by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Informative

      But does it really? Let's remove the UK from the EU. The remaining population: Are they more likely to speak English or french?

      Outside of France, Belgium and Luxembourg which shared common territories recently enough that the language is adopted in the country who else speaks French:
      Netherlands 29%
      Roumania 17%
      Ireland 17%
      Italy 16%
      Portugal 15%
      Germany 14%
      Austria 11%
      The rest 10%

      So way to go, your speech was not understood by the vast majority of the population. Now let's do the same thing to English.

      Ireland 95%
      Netherlands 90%
      Sweeden 86%
      Denmark 86%
      Austria 70%
      Finland 70%
      Slovenia 59%
      Germany 56%
      Belgium 52%
      I'm not going to list all the rest, but not a single country in the EU has less than 20% proficiency in English.

    4. Re:He's right? by qaz123 · · Score: 1

      English is dominant because of the US. If the US loses its status, English will do it too. But I don't see it in the near future at least

    5. Re:He's right? by wyHunter · · Score: 2

      English is dominant because of the British Empire , and the US's continuation of political and technological power as that empire waned after WWII. I don't see the US losing its status in the near future. 50 years from now? Who knows?

    6. Re:He's right? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      They use English because that's what's mandated by IATA. However, at local airports, they can use the local language. And Quebec has an exemption to use French as the principle language, though ATC also speak English (same as a large percentage of the population, both English and French, are bilingual. Drives the rest of the country nuts).

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    7. Re:He's right? by qaz123 · · Score: 2

      English was not as dominant as it is today 100 years ago when the British empire was still in power. The current status of English is because of the US. Of course I don't deny that British Empire had its role.

    8. Re:He's right? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      English is dominant because of English speaking countries being dominant for centuries. Before then it was Spanish or French following centuries of Spanish and French speaking countries being dominant.

      Britain passed the Baton on to the US early in the 20th Century after a few centuries of dominating the world.

      Once China has been top dog for a century mandarin will replace English. Yes, I know it's complicated, etc, but when they're firmly established as the top dog on the globe and running everything, language will slowly creep in until it is essential to understand mandarin, just like it is English today.

      French has been waning in importance for 400 years.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    9. Re:He's right? by qaz123 · · Score: 1

      No, at least in the 18th century and in the first half of 19th century, French was more important than English

    10. Re: He's right? by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      England leaving the EU makes the EU less important.

    11. Re:He's right? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      18th century the world was entering the era of colonialism and exploitation of other people on a massive scale. France was certainly playing 2nd fiddle to Britain during that century, as you can tell by looking at the globe and which countries managed to suppress the most people. Britain's territories were larger and in more desirable locations. France largely took the areas Britain didn't want.

        Arguably, on the european continent they were still the largest land-power. Certainly the major land-based military power.

      Early 19th century you see France react at being left behind (much the same as Germany after WWI going to WWII)- desperate to maintain their importance in the world they launched their last hurrah, their version of mini-Hitler started his war on Europe and got France stomped into the mud. The effects on France were horrific and they never really rebounded completely. Even if you look at something like population, once the most populous nation in Europe they're now equivalent to the UK (despite being larger territory), and only 3/4 of German population. By end of Napoleonic wars there was no question France was of lower importance.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    12. Re:He's right? by mrbester · · Score: 2

      Nice that he gave that speech in a country where only 16% of the population would understand him. There's the EU inclusivity he trumpets when bashing UK for wanting to leave.

      I have used French in the past to talk to Dutch people who didn't know English. Why French? Because I don't know German.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    13. Re:He's right? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      How so?
      Do I now learn slowenian or serbian to talk with girls from there? Or should I learn frensh, and have a funny sexy accent? Or is it better to stick to english as the people from there likely speak english anyway?

      The BREXIT will basically change nothing for the rest of the EU, I doubt we even bother to remove it from the list of official languages to translate legislative texts into.

      The only changes will be:
      a) banking fees for transfering money into and out of the UK
      b) data and speech roaming fees
      c) passport needed instead of simple id card to enter the UK, or for the brits to enter the EU
      d) strict border controls for people comming by plane
      e) probably some hardships for hobbyist sailors
      f) work permit required for people from one side working in the other side (how idiotic)
      g) probably different languages thought in school in the UK ... no idea
      h) probably visa requirements and other nonsense

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re:He's right? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      What people seem to be missing is that less important does not mean unimportant and while 94 is a large number it is smaller than 95.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    15. Re:He's right? by wyHunter · · Score: 1

      And perhaps english dominance was merely a result of satellite communication and/or undersea cable , which are late developments. Who knows?

    16. Re:He's right? by qaz123 · · Score: 1

      People have an instinct. The instinct that makes them to imitate those who have the highest status. As soon as a new "top dog" appears in the world people will start learning its language. It's inevitable. And the media will start "bootstrapping" that new language. Also, the complexity doesn't matter.
      It's one of the reasons of course, not the only one

    17. Re:He's right? by jaklode · · Score: 1

      I think we might end up with a weird mix of English and Mandarin at some point...

    18. Re:He's right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not only this, but English is *the* language of STEM. 100 years ago, German was a competitor, and French earlier, but in science and technology today, if you don't speak relatively fluent English, you're not in the game. You cannot collaborate with others around the world, and your work will rarely be noticed.

      Even Masters and PhDs are written in English by a lot of non-English speakers in universities located in countries that do not have English as their first language. Often with a preamble in the native language (the 'thank you' page, etc) only.

      As English is my first language, this is advantageous for me; but to be honest, it's partially an accident of history. If it was German or Mandarin for example, the important thing would be having a de facto common language.

    19. Re:He's right? by VAXcat · · Score: 2

      Heh....this reminds me of the old aviation story. At Templehof airport in Berlin, a Lufthansa pilot was struggling to communicate with the Tower in English, which he did not speak very well. In frustration, he announced he was a German Pilot in a German plane in Germany, why did he have to use English to talk to the Tower. A British pilot in a British Airways plane replied on the radio "Because you lost the bloody war!"

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    20. Re:He's right? by GNious · · Score: 1

      The BREXIT will basically change nothing for the rest of the EU, I doubt we even bother to remove it from the list of official languages to translate legislative texts into.

      ....did anyone suggest that that would happen?
      I mean, if it's translated to Irish Gaelic, perhaps some of the people in Ireland would be OK though I suspect not all, and the Maltese would prolly still complain.
      Did you instead mean to remove it from the list of official Working Languages?

      Note: EU currently doesn't translate legislative texts to Irish Gaelic for some reason
      Note 2: Apparently more people speak Polish in Ireland, than speak Irish Gaelic
      Note 3: German or Russian would prolly get you some ways with people from Slovenia or Serbia

    21. Re:He's right? by Brama · · Score: 1

      To add to this, I'm pretty sure the 29% of the Netherlands are not very proficient in French. They could probably get away with it as a tourist in France. I've had 4 years of French but then never used it, but for statistical purposes I might 'speak' French.

    22. Re:He's right? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Nice that he gave that speech in a country where only 16% of the population would understand him.

      Except that 100% of his target audience could understand French. The context of his speech is everything. French elections determining the future fate of the EU are tomorrow. French is the most important language anyone could have spoken on TV today anywhere in the EU.

    23. Re:He's right? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Proficiency here means they can get through a basic conversation not that they'll be passing any university courses. Also you'd be surprised what Dutch people can do, especially young ones. My wife is a teacher here and her students (7th grade) learn 6 languages. From the first grade they are taught 2, and from the 5th grade they learn the different structures of international languages. Once you understand the structure of language, learning it becomes easy.

      I sit in an office with 12 chemical engineers. I'm the only one who speaks *only* 3 languages.

    24. Re:He's right? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      You've never been to Italy or you'd realise you're talking out of your arse.

    25. Re:He's right? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      First source in Google. Seems to be similar to figures that come out from Wikipedia too. Probably a difference in measurement, i.e. One measuring basic proficiency and the other the number of people who have passed a certified B2 certificate or some such thing.

      Mind you the figures they have for the Netherlands are waaaay on the conservative side on your site.

    26. Re:He's right? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not only reeks it of pettiness, arrogance and silly wounded pride, but way to go to further de-legitimize yourself and your organisation in a time when you're already in question. Not only are you a complete arsehole who dicks over the population on the behest of the multinationals at every turn, now you're even denighing to speak a language most people understand!

      Fuck me did you miss the point he was making. Less frothing at the mouth and more reading please.

    27. Re:He's right? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Flanders speaks dutch as first language

      hahahahahahahaha. They don't even *claim* to be making noises that sound similar to Dutch :-)

      Actually funny story, travelling on a bus in Croatia there were 3 Belgian girls (as it turns out) in front of me. I couldn't pick their language, but every 1 in a 100 words or so sounded familiar. Anyway eventually we went up and asked them and:

      Girls: "We were speaking Dutch"
      Me: "No you weren't"
      Girls: "Yes we were"
      Me: "I didn't understand a single word."
      Girls (burst out laughing): "We're from Flanders and our entire conversation was just about how no one from the Netherlands can understand us!"

      The rest of trip turned into a language lesson.

    28. Re:He's right? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      He doesn't mean more people understand French, he means that in future if you want to negotiate with the EU it get stuff done in it, speaking French will probably help. France and Germany are the two biggest members.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:He's right? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's not even half of it.

      The Irish border is a major problem with no good solution. Gibraltar is fucked. UK financial services will lose access to the EU. There will be some tariffs, not clear how may yet.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    30. Re:He's right? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      He meant nothing of the sort. Read the context of his quote. He meant that at the time he made his speech French was the most important language to use given his speech was targeted at the French voters of this weekend's election.

      The French like to think French is important, but it is only the 3th most understood language in the EU and is the official language of only the 2nd biggest economic bloc. If he wanted to make a point for the future based on economy, size, or importance he would have made it in German, if he wanted to make a point on how to be understood in the future he would have made it in English.

      What he did make a point of was that the EU hasn't forgotten France and not to forget that come Sunday.

  12. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by OhPlz · · Score: 1

    For the cyka blyat!

  13. Qu'est-ce que tu as pu dire à propos de moi, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Qu'est-ce que tu as pu dire à propos de moi, petite chienne?

  14. Que? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Que dice el artículo?

  15. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny, I was just thinking the EU was losing importance...

  16. Pourquoi? by xession · · Score: 2

    This guy must be an idiot. The only language that is spoken by a roughly equivalent number of people in the world is Mandarin Chinese. Unless Junker intends to push for people switching to Mandarin, he should probably just sit down and stop making an ass of himself.

    Its a good thing when there are fewer barriers to communication in the world. English for the most part, won on the global stage as the cross-over language. Short of another World War, I see little likelihood of this ever changing, especially when considering its embedded adoption in the technology sector.

    1. Re:Pourquoi? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      I can see Mandarin Chinese taking over, especially if China is the first to colonize the Moon and other planets, while other nations are chasing their tails.

    2. Re:Pourquoi? by WrongMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Chinese is tonal language with a pictogram writing system. It's never going to catch on a global language.

    3. Re:Pourquoi? by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      for communication within the EU it's strange to use a language with no native speakers, obviously the logical choice for Germans would be Arabic

    4. Re:Pourquoi? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This guy must be an idiot.

      Wow. You realize something from just a statement that millions in the EU still don't get after years of having him as the EU figurehead.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Pourquoi? by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      English is a language comprised of a 26 character alphabet, assorted punctuation, and has 171,476 words (according to a google search and Oxford dictionary). Many of those words are synonyms with very subtle differences depending on context. We also have a fair share of homonyms to add to the confusion. Combine that with our penchant for creating new words by manipulating our languages underlying prefix-base-suffix rules.

      In English, order matters, subject verb agreements matter, punctuation matters, inflection matters. English is one of the hardest languages to learn, yet many countries do it because the biggest powers- past and present- in the world (U.S.A. and Greatest Britain) speak it. If that shift of power changes, the dominant language will too.

    6. Re:Pourquoi? by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      As AC says above me, a simplified version of mandarin, perhaps with a romanized alphabet will almost certainly be the top language one day. (unless India has a boom this century equivalent to China's last century- in which case English may end up getting even more entrenched so the whole world speaks it).

      I can see mandarin and English getting bastardised with a non-tonal mandarin, perhaps with lots of borrowed English, becoming a world-standard.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    7. Re:Pourquoi? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Chinese is tonal language with a pictogram writing system. It's never going to catch on a global language.

      The reliance on inflection in Chinese is what makes me think it will have a hard time gaining traction. A lot of people are using English with ATC as an example. Now try changing that to Chinese, and add in the accents of non-native speakers with the low fidelity of commercial aviation radios (those headsets are pretty scratchy and hard to hear, especially in a noisy cockpit), and you have a recipe for miscommunication. While English has an annoyingly high amount of homonyms, in terms of inflection even if a word is mispronouced it is usually clear what word is intended. And don't get me started on Arabic. Speaking it is hard enough, but reading it when short vowels aren't even printed and the same 3 letter root can make 5 different words depending on those hidden short vowels is a straight up pain in the ass.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    8. Re:Pourquoi? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Actually, there's a lot to be said for a pictogram writing system as a "global language". Since each glyph essentially represents a complete word, anyone who can memorize the meanings of the pictures can read their writing, without having to actually be able to understand or speak the same language. If you learn the calligraphy, you could similarly write your English (or whatever) using their writing system, and anybody who can read their writing system will know what you are saying.

      In fact, that's exactly why China stuck with it so long. Many Chinese "dialects" are in actuality separate mutually-unintelligible languages. A phonetic-based writing system like an alphabet would have impeded communications across those language boundaries, which would have made for a weaker state. (This is a bit of a simplification though. There *are* today some phonetic aspects to some modern Chinese glyphs.)

      The problem of course is that a writing system with thousands of glyphs is not particularly compatible with printing or computers. When the West invented the printing process that touched off the modern era, China got left in the dust. Even today with Unicode, it was a serious effort to decide on a subset of written Chinese that would fit in the mere 65,356 glyphs (20% of the 16-bit character space) allotted to them. I'm unaware of any keyboard manufacturers who use it.

    9. Re:Pourquoi? by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      As a speaker of both English and Mandarin, I can't help chiming in... English is hard to master but it's easy to learn "just enough" to get by. Mandarin (and Chinese in general) is the same. It all depends on your background. For an Asian student, learning English is probably harder than Chinese; for a Western student, learning English is easier.

      Both languages are hard to master because they both have a rich etymological history going back thousands of years. Both languages have multi-100k-word vocabularies... more than anyone can hope to learn, even in their native tongue.

      However, something like 97% of all verbal communication involves a vocabulary of only 3k~5k words. And both English and Chinese have a pretty simple grammar system -- no declensions / cases in Chinese (only a few 'vestigial' ones in English); no gender; a fairly simple system of verb conjugations; both are, for the most part, simple SVO syntax -- so it's not hard to learn enough of either language to be useful.

      Just look at any hustler on the beach in the Philippines... "Hey Boss, you wan' buy pearl? You wan' fake Rolex?" They can negotiate the entire transaction in broken English. And it doesn't matter where you come from, they will approach you in English every time. Because they know, if you're rich enough to afford a vacation in the PI, you probably learned some basic English in school.

      Chinese -- or any other language -- has a steep hill to climb if it wants to supplant English as the de-facto lingua franca of the modern world.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    10. Re:Pourquoi? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      You are quite right.
      I once learned Japanese, forgot everything except what I need for my martial arts and: except all the Chinese characters. I forgot Hiragana and Katakana, but not many on the Kanji.
      I occasionally by accident learn new Chinese(Japanese) Pictograms (actually they are mostly not pictograms, but ideograms and logograms).
      So I was researching about the Lua programming language, stumbled over a language called 'bright'. It is more C like and used by a company called http://mcci.com/
      I actually was searching for some other Lua variation ...
      I don't remember what made me make that circle but I ended up with the Chinese Ideogram for 'bright'. Which is the combination of the two pictograms for moon and sun, combining them into one ideogram.

      The funny thing is, when I watch movies on youtube (Chinese fantasy/martial arts etc.) I automatically pick up all the Chinese glyphs, they instantly form words in my mind.

      I guess if I would actually learn 800 more glyphs, I could read stuff probably ten times faster ... however I focus on Thai right now.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    11. Re:Pourquoi? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      As AC says above me, a simplified version of mandarin, perhaps with a romanized alphabet will almost certainly be the top language one day.

      Why? English already is the lingua franca.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:Pourquoi? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Vacation in the Philippines is actually extremely cheap.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    13. Re:Pourquoi? by martyros · · Score: 1

      English is semi-tonal too. There are tons of words where the emphasis completely changes the meaning of the word -- sometimes just the part of speech (proGRESS = verb, PROgress = noun), but sometimes to a completely different meaning (duh-ZERT = tasty to eat, DEZ-ert = lots of sand). When someone speaks with no emphasis on their words -- or worse yet, with the wrong emphasis -- you have a hard time understanding what they're saying but you can generally make it out. Same thing with Mandarin.

      You're right, that as long as Chinese insist on using Chinese characters it will never become a world language. But as a spoken language, Mandarin is a lot simpler than English; and if they ever go wholesale into pinyin-only, I think it has a decent shot of overtaking English as a trade language.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    14. Re:Pourquoi? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      This guy must be an idiot.

      Yes a guy making a statement to a French speaking voting bloc on the eve of a French election to determine the future of the EU, and saying that French is the most important language to use right now is an idiot. ...

      Context man. Context. I for one am glad this "idiot" is speaking on behalf of the EU than someone like you who can't see the forest through for all the trees.

    15. Re:Pourquoi? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It is one of the hardest languages to learn but it is incredibly forgiving for pronunciation. Chinese not so where a slight change in tone can change an entire sentence.

  17. Re:German by fisted · · Score: 1

    Gewesen da, getan das. Scheiße war Bargeld.

  18. Well... by XSportSeeker · · Score: 1

    A petty if not justifiable or desperate move from EU.
    It's basically on the brink of collapse, and that's not exactly a good thing. If France elects Marine Le Pen and goes for Frexit, EU is basically over. I didn't think they'd make it this obvious, but of course the only move EU has right now is to the ego of the richest countries left.

    1. Re:Well... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      You don't frighten us, English pig dogs. Go and boil your bottoms, you sons of a silly person. I blow my nose at you, so-called "Arthur King," you and all your silly English K-nig-hts.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Well... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      With the French gone, basically what is left is Germany and "the rest".

      75 years late, but finally The Great German Reich will be back!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Well... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      A petty if not justifiable or desperate move from EU.

      Well, while the guy is the EC president - it seems likely this was just typical Francophone English-baiting. The French have been trying to pretend English doesn't matter ever since French stopped being the international language of diplomacy a century ago.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Well... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

      If France elects Marine Le Pen, I think the world is probably over.

      Trump, Le Pen, Kim, and Putin all leaders at the same time?

      The world couldn't handle it.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    5. Re:Well... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Don't forget May. She is a great source of instability.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  19. Should be German by Parker+Lewis · · Score: 2

    So, if he want to talk about importance, he should speak in German.

    1. Re:Should be German by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      On the eve of a French election determining the future of the EU, while talking almost directly to the French voters, why the hell would he speak German?

  20. Re: So.. what language will be the lingua franca t by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    Espronto.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  21. "Why do we have to speak English?" by david.emery · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't know if this is true, but it's a damn good story:

    At a NATO military conference, the French admiral was complaining, "Why do we have to speak English at all of these events?"
    The Dutch admiral replied, "Because the British, Canadians, and Americans made sure we don't have to speak German."

    1. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing this story. It brought me much joy

      --
      I tend to rant.
    2. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Don't know if it's true, but I absolutely love it regardless.

      Das ist grossartig!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that World War II actually got off the ground because the French refused to muster an army against Germany when they flagrantly violated the Treaty of Versailles by invading the Rhineland, a demilitarized zone per the Treaty and also the Locarno Pact.

      France had over a million troops at its disposal at the time. Germany had some tens of thousands. If France had retaliated with military force and pursued an enforcement action within Germany's borders due to violation of the treaty, then World War II would NOT HAVE HAPPENED.

      The French (and partially the British for their complacency as well at the time) are to blame for World War II. The French get a larger share of the blame specifically because they previously invaded Germany's Ruhr region for purposes of acquiring reparations, yet wouldn't act when real military action was required, and also because France was a lot closer than Britain, and had all the information at their disposal to make the right call.....and they didn't.

      So many people died because France sat and did nothing when Germany gave them the middle finger.

    4. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      True, the more accurate rebuttal would be "Because the British, Canadians, and Americans made sure we don't have to speak Russian."

    5. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it is true but certainly not accurate. The list should at least include the Russians, who probably contributed the most to the defeat of nazi germany.

    6. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      At lest they (along with the UK) had the courage to stand up when Hitler invaded Poland.

    7. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by david.emery · · Score: 1

      But the Soviet Union was not a member of NATO, and this was explicitly at a NATO conference.

      The contributions of the western Allies, not just US but also UK, in providing supplies, vehicles, etc to the Soviet Union shouldn't be discounted. It may not have been the margin of victory, but it certainly allowed the Soviets to exploit their successes, and definitely contributed to ending the war in '45.

    8. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh yeah, brave France and Britain, ignoring the takeover of Austria and Czechoslovakia, but boy howdy, Poland was the last straw! That dereliction of duty is what wiped out France in a matter of days and forced Britain to retreat because none of them were prepared for what had been right in front of their face since 1936.

      World War II didn't have to happen, and it happened because France and the UK didn't do their job of enforcing the treaties and pacts they constructed to keep Germany in line post-World War I.

    9. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      However Russians usually do not attempt to NATO conferences.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    10. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      it's still them who "made sure we don't have to speak German"

    11. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that World War II actually got off the ground because the French refused to muster an army against Germany when they flagrantly violated the Treaty of Versailles by invading the Rhineland, a demilitarized zone per the Treaty and also the Locarno Pact.

      Actually, Winston Churchill put it down to the harsh conditions imposed by the treaty of Versaille. Perhaps if the UK and France (and the US) hadn't completely screwed the German economy and imposed impossible debts onto the Germans, bread would never have reached 5 marks a loaf... which was why Hitler became so popular.

      Fun game, this 20/20 hindsight on history.

      Maybe if the US hadn't been so lazy and got of their arses in 1939 instead of 1941, we wouldn't have had to rely on the Russians.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    12. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Don't know if this is true, but it's a damn good story:

      At a NATO military conference, the French admiral was complaining, "Why do we have to speak English at all of these events?"
      The Dutch admiral replied, "Because the British, Canadians, and Americans made sure we don't have to speak German."

      Plenty of jokes like this. My favourite:

      Someone muttered some German over the ATC channel over Frankfurt airport. ATC responded with "Speak English please".
      The airliner asked "I am a German pilot in a German aircraft flying over a German airport. Why cant I speak German?".
      The next response was in a perfect English accent "because we won the bloody war".

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    13. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by david.emery · · Score: 1

      The way I heard this was a BOAC 707 (predecessor to British Airways) was on a flight from LHR to FRA, and was having problems finding the airport in the fog.

      BOAC pilot: Request vectors to runway.
      German ATC: I gave you vectors. What is wrong, have you never flown to Frankfurt before?
      BOAC pilot: Yes, but that was back in 1944, and I didn't land.

    14. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by bungo · · Score: 1

      Actually, Russia does attend NATO conferences. I can't remember that actual term, but they have some observer status, and there are Russians in the non-secret security areas of the NATO headquarters.

      Obviously the don't attend the meetings of only the 28 member countries, but there is still some interaction between Russia and everyone else. Russia used to have the largest delagation to NATO, bigger than most of the member countries, until the Ukraine issues and a lot of Russians were kicked out.

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    15. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by bungo · · Score: 1

      I doubt it is true, as in the meetings that general staff would attend, everyone can speak in their native tongue, and there are interpreters giving live translations.

      Also, French is one of the official languages of NATO.

      --
      "The best part? I became an ordained minister while not wearing pants." -- CleverNickName
    16. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by Evil+Kerek · · Score: 1

      I would put forth that Hitler had more to do with the defeat of Nazi Germany by engaging the Russians in the first place....

    17. Re:"Why do we have to speak English?" by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I think you messed up the punchline.

      Nope, the British don't say "you lost the war", that is poor form and denotes a lack of self respect. What you wrote is yet another American butchering of the Queens English.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  22. Re:Interesting by Aighearach · · Score: 2

    He probably doesn't realize that all the French voter rolls are processed and the data input by Bulgarians who don't speak French.

    Without using English, they wouldn't even be able to have their ballots printed.

    All their government documents have to be translated into all the dozens of EU languages... by the same people. And those people only speak Bulgarian, English, and German. Very few people in the world want to learn French, and that includes people who translate French documents all day! It also includes French people, who often write the originals in English.

    Considering French labor laws, there is no way that France would be able to afford to hire French people to do that sort of work.

    It is true that if you visit France and appear to be a native English speaker, lots of people will pretend they don't speak it. Just practice asking, "Do you speak Russian?" first and then they'll answer you in English.

    Without English, the EU wouldn't even work. If the French really think English is on the decline, they should be studying German because that would be the next choice for a "glue language" in Europe.

  23. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    English is a bastard language. look at common spellings of words that are pronounced differently (tough, bough) etc etc, rules with exceptions, words that sound the same but are different (there, their)

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  24. C'est vrai by pr0nbot · · Score: 3, Funny

    When he realises English is the lingua franca in Europe I shall experience great schadenfreude.

    1. Re:C'est vrai by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Given the number of EU citizens who speak 2 or more languages, and that after Brexit less than 1% will have English as their mother tongue, it's the EU citizenry who will be shaking their heads at the UKs insistence on making themselves less relevant.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    2. Re:C'est vrai by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Where do you think the Americans got their language from? Why do you think that language Americans speak is called "English" and not "American" or something else?

      Sure, people often make the distinction between "American English" and what many call "Queen's English" but the difference is so small that it's still "English".

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  25. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by omnichad · · Score: 1

    lingua franca

    Probably a Frankish language, or maybe even French?

  26. French lost its importance 100 years ago by Zemran · · Score: 2

    He said that English is losing its importance and then gave his speech in French? That sounds like a Monty Python joke.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  27. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Once the UK leaves, English will be the mother tongue of less than 1% of the EU. It's the Brexiters who are doing the bashing to their own language by reducing its relevancy.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  28. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by Nutria · · Score: 1

    What gives you the idea that criticizing Mandarin and ignoring Russian means that I'm defending English?

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
  29. Les Raisins Aigres! by DatbeDank · · Score: 2

    I have a lot of French and Russian friends that i've made during my travels. One thing that i've noticed between them is a sort of mild cultural annoyance that their language isn't as dominant like English or even to an extent Spanish.

    The UK was an EU anchor tenant. No amount of EU sour grapes will change that fact. Even without them, everyone will still be wanting to speak English.

  30. Unfortunately by qaz123 · · Score: 1

    He's not right yet

  31. Re: So.. what language will be the lingua franca t by msk · · Score: 2

    If you mean Esperanto, then yes. It would be a better choice than French for ease of learning, especially when it comes to pronunciation.

  32. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Very few people in the world want to learn French, and that includes people who translate French documents all day! It also includes French people, who often write the originals in English.

    Citation needed [even an anecdote would do]. Everybody wants to learn French [except for the Americans, of course].

    Good time to remember that French used to be the official language in England, whose first Official English document was issued around 1350.

  33. Jean-Claude? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    So you're saying a Frenchman said English is losing importance?
    Sounds like typical butthurt Frenchie behavior to me.

    Disclaimer: I was born and brought up French. I think the language wars are fucking stupid and hate it when French people walk into a restaurant, making a scene at the fact the waiter doesn't speak perfect fucking French (add emphasis on the "fucking").

    Fucking get over it!

    --
    I tend to rant.
    1. Re:Jean-Claude? by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      You know that the guy is from Luxembourg, not France, right?

    2. Re:Jean-Claude? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      I'm Canadian.

      I wasn't bitching about his nationality, I was bitching at the cultural behavior of French people in general. Quebec and France being the worse, but definitely not the exceptions.

      My buddy from my college days was from France, awesome fellow.

      This isn't me dumping all French people into one basket. This is me asserting an observation I've made throughout my 27 years on this planet.

      Clearly there are English speaking people who feel the same about French speaking people, just like there are Chinese speaking people who feel the same about Japanese speaking people (sorry I don't know the proper name for the Japanese common language, so I left both as Chinese and Japanese)

      When the "Oh no we're losing our language! We need to ban everything that isn't French from our schools!" agenda is shoved down your throat deep enough, you'll understand how I feel about this.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    3. Re:Jean-Claude? by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      This isn't me dumping all French people into one basket.

      Yes this is exactly that.

      Clearly there are English speaking people who feel the same about French speaking people

      If by "feel the same" you meant "racist", then yes, you are the living proof that these people do exist.

    4. Re:Jean-Claude? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      At this point you're just attacking me personally, and doing a poor job of it mind you.
      I expressed my opinion, you challenged it in some weird way, I clarified my position by providing personal experiences.

      Are you capable of more than one-line, nonsensical, arguments? That would be great if we're going to keep this up. Your statements suck.

      Just as an fyi... French and English people are not a "race". Look it up before calling people racists.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    5. Re:Jean-Claude? by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      You must be the kind of person who says that hating Muslims is not racist since Islam is a religion.
      Racism is not only about race (what is a race, anyways? a skin color?) but about perceived or real ethnic groups, from which one can't really escape. You can't stop from being middle eastern or French, even whether you consider those to be races or not.
      When you express your opinion by saying that you bitch against " cultural behavior of French people in general. Quebec and France being the worse", you are being racist against the French-(speaking) ethnic group, in that case particularly France and Quebec.

      Now, I won't apologize for saying the truth, even if you consider it to be a personal attack. The problem with racist people is that they get along when nobody tells them they are being racist. That why there are so many out there.

    6. Re:Jean-Claude? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      No.
      Seriously, look it up. You just constructed your own definition of what racism is, without even knowing the proper definition of what a race is.

      The fact that I would hate the cultural behavior of the town 1 hour from here, or hate the cultural behavior of the French in general, makes absolutely no difference. Both groups are comprised of very cool people, but the culture is still fucking hogwash. That doesn't change the fact that I am Acadian born, French of origin, and Caucasoid of race. I simply choose to not buy into the overall mentality, which exists in all cultures, whether you like it or not.

      Stop trying to attack me personally and try to understand my point of view for once.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    7. Re:Jean-Claude? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      If you take a moment to observe; all of his comments seem to automatically get upvoted by at least 1.

      --
      I tend to rant.
    8. Re:Jean-Claude? by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      I understand your point of view perfectly. I don't care if you hate the culture of a race or a country or an ethnicity, I consider them all to be racism. Just because you have a very narrow definition of racism doesn't mean it's the only definition.

    9. Re:Jean-Claude? by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      Ok I get it now. You live in your own little bubble.
      That's fine, enjoy your life mate.

      --
      I tend to rant.
  34. Re:Interesting by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    Yes, interesting. What makes you think he did? According to all news reports I have been able to find, he spoke French.

    I may have been mistaken. I may have read this quote and misapplied "The EU’s chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier said he would deliver his speech in English. “ If incorrect thanks for pointing that out.

  35. Please read this as what it means by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The EU head honcho says English is losing importance after the UK leaves the EU.

    It's left as an exercise to the reader to determine whether this message is backed by

    a) reality
    b) politics

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  36. Dominance, Not Importance by eepok · · Score: 1

    English will be an important language for the next couple hundred years. Chinese recently became an important language to know (within the last 30 years). What English (as a language) is losing isn't important, but dominance. Twenty years ago, you would have heard that EVERYONE should learn English because it's the global language of business. Today, economics has changed and now you can be part of the global market while not knowing English. Moreover, with the (marginally) dominant nationalist/isolationist politics of Britain and America, globally minded countries will look to other countries (and thus their languages) for partnerships... but English will still be important.

  37. Re:Bitter by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Junker is generally regarded increasingly as a clown. Even with people who are actually pro-EU (like myself).

    The sooner this bozo goes the better.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  38. Re:German by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Only because English is an official language of only one EU country + a few micro nations.

    But in terms of proficiency of language English is more widely understood throughout Europe than German and French combined. So regardless of what's official, English is by far the most important.

    While you're right about which will learn German over French, it does gloss over the fact that of all the countries you listed English is by far the dominant, again even when you combine German and French.

  39. Re:Mais non! by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    The article says he will deliver the speech in English because it's important that the UK understands. It's not like most Brits can understand more than one language, not even Cockney.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  40. Re:Another person spoke in English by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    He should have said "Obviously I want to be understood by the French, but it is equally important than I am understood by the rest of the world."

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  41. No, not really by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For one, English is still the language of the United States who is still and exceedingly important trade and military partner with most of the world. That alone makes English pretty important. Likewise while the UK may be leaving the EU, they'll still be trading with the EU, nothing really changes there.

    However the real importance of English comes not from the nations where it is the primary language, but all the nations where it isn't. The reason is that while English is only the 3rd or 4th most spoken first language it is, by a mile, the most spoken second language in the world. When people from different nations get together to do business, English is generally the language they use. Chinese is not widely spoken in Japan and Japanese is sure as hell not popular in China, but English is a common second language in both and so usually used when companies from the two nations do business.

    In the EU it is even more important as there are a ton of primary languages. If you wanted to do business in the native language of all EU nations you'd need to speak Dutch, French, German (a couple variants thereof), Danish, Irish, Greek, Portuguese, Finnish, Swedish, Hungarian, Greek, Turkish, Czech, Estonian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Slovak, Slovene, Bulgarian, Romanian, and Croatian. While you can find people with that kind of language skill, they are very rare and very sought after. Getting one for your firm is unlikely... However English is a popular second language in all those places, so you can do business in that. You can have people from Germany, Croatia, Greece, and Spain all at a table and English is a language they can probably all use whereas the likelihood that they all speak each other's native tongue is pretty low.

    English has become the language of common exchange, and nothing seems to be changing that. Should another language take over for that, French is not likely to be it, much though the French may wish it was.

    1. Re:No, not really by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The UK's trading relationship with the EU will change. The deal outside the EU won't be as good as the one in it, and the current government seems like it wants to crash out hard to WTO rules.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  42. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by qaz123 · · Score: 1

    Language complexity has nothing to do with its dominance. If say Chinese or Russians become dominant in business, military, science, I can assure, you everybody will start learning Chinese or Russian

  43. Re:Interesting by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Of course he did. He was addressing the English speaking people at the time and telling them exactly why it is so important right now (on the eve of an election in France that will decide the fate of the EU in a literal sense) that he speaks French.

    Today English is the most spoken language. But in terms of the future of the EU it is by far not the most important.

    Sunday after the election one hopes that this will change again.

  44. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 3, Informative

    The keywords are irrelevant. It's simple enough to write a keyword translator. I wrote one that translated BASIC from a custom set of french keywords to English way back in the mid-80s for a friend. If you can't write a translator, or even just a series of macros or a regex or a perl script to do the job, you need to realize TIMTOWTDI.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  45. Re:About the EU, not the world by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The joke runs even deeper.

    Every EU member state could nominate its "official" language when it joined. Of course, various countries nominated their most common language. France chose French, Germany German, Spain Spanish, you get the idea.

    Ireland picked Irish because there was no reason to choose English with England already covering this. Malta chose Maltese because there was no reason to choose English because... yes.

    Now, with England leaving, English will no longer be an official language of the EU. Yes, I'm not kidding. NO other member state named English an official language. Funny enough, a fair lot of representatives of various countries speak their own language and English, only. And a fair number of interpreters and translators, while required to speak more than just two languages, will have a hard time interpreting/translating when you can't use English as an intermediate anymore.

    And while it is likely that this will at least be solvable by throwing more money at interpreters (it might be a bit tough finding someone with rare combos like Polish-Spanish), it doesn't solve another problem: With most delegates only really speaking their own language and English, in the near future, most talks between delegates will be held in a language that is officially not even spoken in the EU anymore. That alone makes the Brexit hilarious.

    That and the fact that quite a few Irish delegates will soon no longer be able of even choosing a language from the interpreters that they can understand reasonably well.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  46. Re: Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mother tongue huh? Well, my mother tongue is german, and I feel like 90% of germans around me, including myself, speak english most of the time. Even at the bar, because there is usually someone from the UK, who doesn't speak german quite as good, hanging out with us. Frankly, you're being ridiculous.

  47. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    Over 50% of people in the EU will still understand English to a competent level because it is the language of international business and taught in many schools. It is true, statistically, almost no one will be speaking English as their native language once the UK leaves (although a decent % of Ireland speak English in their homes).

    English will still be the most understood language in the EU even if not the native tongue.
    German will be the most common native tongue in EU (as it already is).

    French is only really important to France, parts of Belgium, and the parts of the world they once occupied.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  48. Re:Interesting by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Yes, interesting. What makes you think he did? According to all news reports I have been able to find, he spoke French.

    I may have been mistaken. I may have read this quote and misapplied "The EU’s chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier said he would deliver his speech in English. “ If incorrect thanks for pointing that out.

    He explained why he was speaking in French, in English.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  49. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    English speaks for itself.

  50. It's the second language of 100% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    See title (written in English and understood throughout EU).

  51. Arabic by rfengr · · Score: 1

    Arabic will soon be the official language of Europe.

    1. Re:Arabic by hackel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right after they enact Sharia law!! Oh noes!!!

      (PS—You're an idiot.)

  52. Re:Junke speaks English by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you read the article, he spoke in English because he wanted the English to understand him, and it's not like the majority of the UK speak ANY second language.

    How do you expect to have an effective negotiating team when the people on the opposite side of the table can understand everything you say, but also have private conversations right in front of your face because you don't know any second language? Make fun of you with a straight face? Say that the only difference between you and a bucket of shit is the bucket? Debate strategy in private without leaving the room or whispering amongst themselves? Call you a dumb f*ck to your face?

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  53. Re:German by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    And now ponder how much you have to suck as a nation when other nations would rather willingly learn the language of a country that invaded and enslaved them not even a century ago than yours.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  54. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    To be a business language people have to be able to learn it as adults, and be able to identify documents using just a phrase book.

    The written form has to be based on the Latin alphabet. The reason is simple; lots of languages already use it. So there is broad familiarity with the concept of having a phonetic encoding system using approximately these same letters. No other writing system has that.

    Russian is not viable in a post-Soviet world. It is laughable.

    Chinese or Arabic-speaking people can look up phrases in a Latin alphabet using a phrase book. And nobody else is going to easily use theirs. So it is not even viable. It is not even 1% chance. Plus, other reasons.

  55. The real problem of English in the EU by fred6666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    is that once the UK leaves, English will no longer be an official language of any UE member country. Ireland declared Irish and Malta declared Maltese as their official language for EU purposes, even if their people speak mostly English.

    1. Re:The real problem of English in the EU by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      It does matter because EU institutions work in official languages only. Everything is translated in all languages. So if Ireland or Malta (or some other country) don't change their official language, English will loose its official status within the EU.

    2. Re:The real problem of English in the EU by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      It does matter because EU institutions work in official languages only. Everything is translated in all languages.

      So no change then. Also loss of English as an official language does not change it's status as a procedural language.

    3. Re:The real problem of English in the EU by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      I meant everything is translated in official languages of their members country (obviously not all languages of the world), which English no longer will be.

    4. Re:The real problem of English in the EU by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      English is still a primary procedural language. Everything the EC or parliament does is first published in English German and French before any translations are done.

      No change.

    5. Re:The real problem of English in the EU by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      why would that stay if English is no longer an official language of any country within the union? They could replace English with Italian or Spanish at this point...

    6. Re:The real problem of English in the EU by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Because it is the most translatable and understandable language in the entire union. Given that French and German are already procedural languages, you'd need to add the next 5 most popular languages as procedural languages just to reach the same audience.

      And that's before you even consider the case of having the EU change languages in documents and the mess that will introduce.

    7. Re:The real problem of English in the EU by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      pretty sure they could just stop producing new documents in English (or any other language) without creating any mess. In fact, the more languages they have to support, the bigger the mess.

    8. Re:The real problem of English in the EU by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      To what end? Make legislation unreadable for 220 million people?

      For the lulz?

    9. Re:The real problem of English in the EU by fred6666 · · Score: 1

      legislation is already translated into every official language of the EU

  56. Re:Juncker is just afraid of a Frexit. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    If he were doing this to address Frexit, he wouldn't have spoken in English. His real target was the UK, which seems to think that they will get a better deal outside the EU than they have inside.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  57. Re:Au contraire... by qaz123 · · Score: 1

    They can chose language that has the smallest number of speakers in EU.

  58. If only... by hackel · · Score: 1

    I really wish this were true, but it's just so far from reality. Political grandstanding of the worst order. As someone who speaks the broken English of a U.S. American, I think it is a terrible language and absolutely should not be the "universal" language of the world. It's just bad. Not particularly expressive, difficult for newcomers to learn, ridiculous, inconsistent grammar rules, etc. It is my hope that continued advances in machine translation will allow people to revert to using their own languages even more. Universal translators will one day be a thing. But today is not that day.

    1. Re:If only... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      Are other languages any better? Spanish has about 50 verb tenses. French is almost as strange for pronunciation as English, in fact some of the strangest words in English are FROM French. Mandarin might have easy grammar, but Chinese writing is beyond PITA.

      Languages are like computer operating systems; they all suck, but in different ways.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:If only... by painandgreed · · Score: 2

      I really wish this were true, but it's just so far from reality. Political grandstanding of the worst order. As someone who speaks the broken English of a U.S. American, I think it is a terrible language and absolutely should not be the "universal" language of the world. It's just bad. Not particularly expressive, difficult for newcomers to learn, ridiculous, inconsistent grammar rules, etc.

      However actual usage patterns and current language theory from articles I've read seem to say the exact opposite. English's willingness to mangle its grammar, borrow loan words, and define meaning by use makes it easier to learn, more expressive, and adopted more widely than the languages. The opposite side of things would be French with their Académie française which seems to be losing out due to its rigidity.

    3. Re:If only... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Spanish has 50 verb tenses? How should that be possible?
      It is a simplified version of Latin. That means 3 primary tenses. Plus the 'completed' form of it and then the subjunctive.
      And if you speak any other European languge, that will have a similar amount of tenses.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  59. Re: So.. what language will be the lingua franca t by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    They don't have the population to take over the world, and if they blow up the world I still don't have to speak Russian!

  60. Just to be clear... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...if the political leaders of this world are wondering why people are taking their stupid claims less seriously and turning toward other sources (ie the rise of "fake news")?

    THIS would be the reason.

    A major, possibly THE major political leader of the EU making a blanket, provably false statement.

    Yet I expect Mr Tusk would also assert that because of his penchant for use of falsehoods, Mr Trump is "stupid".

    What's "hypocrisy" in French, Mr Tusk?

    --
    -Styopa
  61. Re:Classic French politician. by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    French-Canadians as well.

    I remember watching a Brian Mulroney press conference years ago (yes I'm old). One reporter asked a question in English, which Mulroney answered. After he finished another reporter asked pretty much the identical question - but in French! So Mulroney basically gave the same answer again.

    This cycle happened three or four times during that press conference. It wasn't every question... but it was enough to be noticeable and quite silly.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  62. Re:German by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    German is growing in importance in the east of Europe, mostly because lots of people from there want to work in Germany or Austria (where they also speak German). It's not only closer than France, Germans and (even more so) Austrians are still popular with their eastern neighbors, despite the more recent history. Germany gets lots of workers from Poland, Austria has many people from Hungary and now increasingly Romania going there to work. These people learn German, not English or French.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  63. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

    Plus the set of keywords is small and easy to learn anyway. The keywords used in programming languages are English words and they kind of have a similar meaning but really they're not all that natural to native English speakers. If they were, we could all start writing webapps as soon as we graduated kindergarten. No what I expect to start seeing is programs using English keywords and UTF8 variables names but the comments all being in native languages. The English-only speakers will be at a slight disadvantage.

  64. Re:Classic French politician. by fred6666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The guy is from Luxembourg, not France.

  65. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by ghoul · · Score: 1

    What people may not be aware of, is that computer languages, especially HTML and JavaScript will require people who want to enter the IT field to know at least elementary English. The keywords in HTML tags recognized by all browsers around the word are in English, as is the JavaScript language. While there are some interpreters of compiled languages like C++ in other languages (Chinese for C++ examples exists) the more popular languages have English keyword bases. (see like of non-English based computer languages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...)

    since this is the case, any country wanting "in" on the booming IT industry will have to know some basic English. The English speaking community got the core computer programming/formatting languages out first and as usual, first to publish will have more control it long term.

    Computer Languages are made up of keywords. There is a constant struggle to make programming more accessible by making computer languages more readable by adding syntactic sugar. However for a people who grew up writing a language where every symbol is not a letter but a keyword , computer languages are as readable as their natural language. I expect languages to come out which use Chinese characters for Keywords.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  66. Re:Classic French politician. by twms2h · · Score: 1

    Juncker is not French, he's from Luxembourg.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  67. English Speakers Say EU Is Losing Importance by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    This is demonstrable. Juncker's opinion is only an opinion, and a petulant one at that.

    1. Re:English Speakers Say EU Is Losing Importance by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      What time of day was it? If it was after 14:00 he was probably drunk, and if it was before 12:30 he'd be hungover from the previous day.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  68. Re:Another off-topic useless, #fakenews msmash pos by msmash · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bwahahahahaha, no.

  69. Re:About the EU, not the world by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

    You're mistaken. Counties are allowed multiple official languages. Ireland and Malta have English as one of theirs, so the eu will be obligated to keep English not just for reasons of practicality.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  70. Re:Another off-topic useless, #fakenews msmash pos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's literally everywhere, including The New York Times. Please tell us how you have better sense of news than those guys.

  71. Re:Classic French politician. by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 2

    You must be from France, because you're taking serious offense going through every comment in this thread mentioning this guy being from France, and specifying he's from Luxembourg. Not like there's any real difference between the two...

    --
    I tend to rant.
  72. Tish! That's French! by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    French is a dying language, spoken only in the former African and Southeast Asian countries, and a dying empire. Soon it will just be a stupid accent, which is too bad, I like Maurice Chevalier

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  73. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    On the world scale, the francophonie has more than 50 full members (84 if you include observers), even excluding the Central African Republic and Thailand (human rights violations).

    Those countries comprise a billion people. Those "parts of the world they once occupied" are hardly insignificant.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  74. Re:Classic French politician. by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    no, I'm not...

  75. Re:Mais non! by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    a lot of them don't even understand their native english either as their lack of ability to comprehend facts attests hence brexit

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  76. Re:Interesting by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    If you're explaining, you're losing.

    Ronald Reagan

  77. Re:Junke speaks English by Barsteward · · Score: 1

    The EU have been considering have the exit negotiations in french

    --
    "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
  78. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    It's not like every question on stackoverflow is unique. There are plenty of sites in other languages with plenty of code snippets. The official french PHP documentation, also available in 9 other languages. You can find french versions for most programming languages, including c++ and java, just by searching $PROGRAMMING_LANGUAGE_OF_CHOICE examplaires . Or you can substitute the word "examplaires" for the the translation of the term "example" in the written language of your choice.

    atoi()? Whatever your little heart and your imagination desires. For example, overload entier() to take strings in a header, and then a simple text substitution of atoi() to entier(). Or if you like conciseness, ent. 25% fewer letters than atoi.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  79. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by evolutionary · · Score: 1

    Yes but you had to WRITE the translator first. The base language wasn't changed, you just added a translator to it.If you have to read source code, you are helpless without the tools, or knowing basic English. That is how people get locked into platforms. In any even the world standard is pretty much established. Translators solidify that if anything.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
  80. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 2

    On the world scale, the francophonie has more than 50 full members (84 if you include observers), even excluding the Central African Republic and Thailand (human rights violations).

    Those countries comprise a billion people. Those "parts of the world they once occupied" are hardly insignificant.

    From a worldwide perspective outside those areas they are. Most of the French speaking countries outside Europe are impoverished and not very well connected globally. That might change in the future, but there isn't really anywhere near as much reason to learn French as an outsider than there is English.

    It could all be down to 19th century policies. The British knew their territories were too widespread to try to hold on to forever purely using military domineering, and so tried to make their presence at least partially tolerated by maintaining trade and cooperation. (not that Britain didn't do so terrible unspeakable acts- and conquering land in the first place could be considered impolite).

    France, and Belgium showed little concern for the countries they occupied and were more brutal in their rape of those countries. They tried to make their territories too scared to rebel. The result is today, those countries are still recovering and relative backwaters.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  81. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by evolutionary · · Score: 1

    I'm sensing a trend and preference to French here. Personal opinions are fine, but there is the basic fact that the methods are still in English and being objective. manuals are all nice, and the open source community has made great efforts to help there. But as long as the methods and core keywords of accept languages are English, you have to learn a little English. look, I've worked abroad in a couple places teaching ESL for awhile. And French is hardly the best example as there are many words that are similar to English or near cognates you can utilize there, but that is an isolated method. What about, say a language completely incompatible with romance languages. Say, Chinese. (I'd say Japanese but English has been integrated into a lot of common phrases in Japanese since WWII to the point an someone with no Japanese can pick out a few things accurately). The Chinese language is totally alien to English but a Chinese programmer is forced to learn many verbs and object names to program. A translator is likely to get it totally wrong as there are cultural elements to language as well. True Language is not just "grammar-translation" method which is abysmal for teaching communication anyway. It's true that programming keywords won't make someone fluent, but "Hello Word" examples has certainly gotten that basic meaning across. If you can apply your simple word translation in a meaningful way to languages like Chinese, Egyptian, or Swahili, koodos to you. Using the grammar-translation approach to getting keywords in an incompatible language makes it harder to program as you get an incorrect meaning of what it actually means. Sorry if English being important because of the tools is distasteful to you. I've thought about it for years. Bottom line, we have to accept something. And English was there first.

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
  82. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by slew · · Score: 1

    English is a bastard language. look at common spellings of words that are pronounced differently (tough, bough) etc etc, rules with exceptions, words that sound the same but are different (there, their)

    If that is your criteria for a "bastard" language, don't ever try to learn Chinese. There are hundreds of homophones (words that sound the same but have totally different meanings) and the writing is not related at all to the pronunciation (being a logosyllabic writing scheme)...

    On the other hand if you combine all English and Chinese fluent (and semi-fluent) people in world they probably out number all other languages and the fact that millions of children successfully learn both languages all the time, it might be fair to ask what problem (if any) there might be with a
      "bastard" language. French is after all kind of a "bastard" Celtic-Latin language...

  83. Re:The only reasonable list of standard language by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    + Hebrew (Israel)

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  84. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's look at The Numbers:

    Number of native English speakers: 500 million
    Number of native French speakers: 80 million
    Number of 2nd language English speakers: 510B
    Number of 2nd language French speakers: 192M

  85. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by slew · · Score: 1

    Chinese or Arabic-speaking people can look up phrases in a Latin alphabet using a phrase book. And nobody else is going to easily use theirs. So it is not even viable. It is not even 1% chance. Plus, other reasons.

    Given the current trends in technology "phrase-books" are going the way of books (niche applications only). Even today, they have photo-translators (free apps available on Android anyhow, don't know about iOS) and they are only going to get better over time. Universal translators (good enough for identifying documents and traveling) are probably going to become ubiquitous in a few years.

  86. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by tsqr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Once the UK leaves, English will be the mother tongue of less than 1% of the EU. It's the Brexiters who are doing the bashing to their own language by reducing its relevancy.

    Last summer my wife and I toured the Czech Republic, Germany, Austria, Slovakia, and Hungary. We encountered language barrier issues exactly zero times. Everybody we met - hotel staff, merchants, even random people in the street when we needed directions - understood and spoke English more than adequately for the purpose. Also true to a slightly lesser extent when we visited Amsterdam a few years back. I suspect tourism drives this as much as any other factor. We met a group of people travelling together who were from Sweden, and they spoke English so fluently and accent-free that I was shocked to learn where they were from (I had been guessing Canada).

  87. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Maybe you don't know it, but you're using a translater that someone else wrote for every single program that you write, whether translated at compile time or run time, unless you're punching in hex codes into ram. So what's your point. It only takes ONE person to write the language. Or to take the language compiler or runtime source code and change the keywords to keywords of their choice, and distribute the new compiler or runtime interpreter, in which case the extra translation stage is skipped, and there's no worry about clashes between the old and new keywords.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  88. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    The highest population growth is occurring in many of those countries. Population pressure plus environmental degradation are going to lead to mass migrations and wars that will, either directly or indirectly, affect everyone who isn't part of the 0.1%.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  89. Esperanto by lcall · · Score: 1

    It seems like Esperanto should be everyone's 2nd language, simply because it's so easy to learn yet seems ~"complete", and more importantly, has been shown to make learning other languages easier to the point that overall you learn, say, more French if you learn Esperanto first, than if one spent the entire time studying French. So learn whatever you would have learned as a 2nd language, for the 3rd, and you saved time and got farther, overall (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto#Third-language_acquisition). And it seems to me the easiest way for someone to better understand the grammar of their own native language, by seeing a simple & clean example.

    I don't think aficionados usually see it as a replacement for a first (or native) language, though that has been done intentionally by some (per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., or search https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... for "native").

    Then there's the side benefit of being by far the cheapest effective global route to everyone being able to talk to and understand each other, even if haltingly. For some people, learning English is simply too hard. For the rest, it's still a very big effort, and Esperanto is extremely easy by comparison. In terms of global cost/benefit, Esperanto seems like a big win. And it's fun!

    An excellent, persuasive explanation from Claude Piron: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    (PS: There are other interesting constructed languages each with their pros & cons, but none with nearly the same amount of traction or interest as Esperanto. It's interesting to consider, given all that has been learned in the field so far, how to "optimize" a constructed human language, considering various factors like ease, familiarity, beauty, efficiency, computability, or whatever one sees as most important. Also, feel free to point me to how link text should be covered with a url when posting.)

    --
    A Free, fast personal organizer for touch typists: onemodel
    1. Re:Esperanto by lcall · · Score: 1

      (ignore my stupid question about the link text)

      --
      A Free, fast personal organizer for touch typists: onemodel
  90. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by HiThere · · Score: 1

    The real problem with your argument is that new computer languages arise all the time. Even now...

    When Ruby first came out I couldn't even decide whether I was interested because everything was only in Japanese, and it's still true than many libraries are first released with only Japanese documentation, and the English follows later...sometimes over a year later.

    The current generation of languages clearly favors English speakers, but it's not like the Air-Traffic controllers, there's no real need for new languages to be internationally intelligible.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  91. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Methods don't have to be in English. Take the compiler or runtime source code and you can make all the keywords in any arbitrary language. And no, a properly made code translator does not get it wrong. I've done it.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  92. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

    Poverty and population growth unfortunately almost always go hand-in-hand. I have seen predictions about French overtaking English globally as a first language in the coming century. I don't think that will push French into being the world's dominant language though. If as you say, there are mass migrations from those poor population growth areas, it's usually the people migrating to learn the new language.

    The only way there is going to be more pressure for people to learn French as a foreign language is if those French speaking countries get out of poverty and become financially important players on a global stage.

    --
    "That's the way to do it" - Punch
  93. Re:Interesting by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 1

    It is true that if you visit France and appear to be a native English speaker, lots of people will pretend they don't speak it.

    In Paris, maybe-- at least, that's the stereotype.

    Get outside of Paris, though, and the French people are quite friendly and will be happy to speak with you in your bad French or in their pretty-good English or in whatever other language you both have in common.

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
  94. Yeah, okay. by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

    "English losing importance," says man in member state of a multinational alliance that relies on the United States to keep its defense costs at rock bottom.

  95. I thought Nationalism was bad by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    People who don't speak primarily English, often learn English because of tourism, trade and travel.

    But sure, if you plan to not engage in the larger world economy, stick to whatever language your corner of the world speaks and bloviate about how Brexit is racist and nationalist.

  96. Bye then. by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    He has pulled that butthurt stunt before. Because he thinks that with the "brexit", the only country who speaks English are leaving.
    He certainly going to alienate a lot more.
    There's a lot of us who don't understand German or French and if they again threaten to drop English, there's a lot of us who won't be able to understand what the leaders of our country are saying.

    It would be yet another nail in the EUs coffin, and even though I like the concept of the EU as it was originally sold. I don't want what we have now or where it's going. We where specifically told that it would NOT be the United States of Europe but a trade union.

    But let them speak French, I will welcome that so that we can get rid of the EU.

    1. Re:Bye then. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      We where specifically told that it would NOT be the United States of Europe but a trade union.
      Who told you that and why did you believe it?
      Of course we are transforming slowly into united states of Europe. However greatly different than the USA.

      I don't want what we have now or where it's going.
      I do. Most 'anti EU' stuff is just propaganda by idiots.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  97. Mandrake by unixisc · · Score: 1

    How was Mandrake Linux, when it was around?

    1. Re:Mandrake by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Most people liked it.
      It was Debian based if I recall correctly.
      However the company falter at some point ...

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  98. Re:Classic French politician. by Kergan · · Score: 1

    FWIW Luxembourg was, culturally and historically, part of the Holy Roman Empire. Huge difference.

  99. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    At the top of your link: "all such lists should be used with caution." :-)

    12% of the Eu's 510 million people have French as their mother tongue. That's over 60 million. Throw in 7 million in Canada, most who speak Quebec French (a variant of French, same as English Quebecers speak Quebec English and there are various variants of English in the UK). Hait has 10 million people, with mother tongue divided between "French" French and Haitian Creole (a local variant of French). We're already just 3 million under your 80 million native speakers.

    Are you seriously going to maintain that the other 50+ countries of the francofonie have a total population of only 3 million people whose mother tongue is French?

    The figure is full of shit.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  100. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by unixisc · · Score: 1

    Maybe. But if the EU continues its open doors policies w/ the Mohammedan world much longer, it won't be English against whom they'll be preserving their precious languages. They'll run the risk of being supplanted by Arabic, Turkish and Urdu.

  101. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by unixisc · · Score: 3

    Question is: will the French be as valiant in defending their language from being supplanted by Arabic, in the same way that they are vis a vis English? The Moors would be a lot more virulently anti French than the English ever were, even during the 100 years war.

  102. Re: So.. what language will be the lingua franca t by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    If Esperanto was easy to learn to pronounce. Then why do all the Esperanto snobs complain about William Shatner in the movie "Incubus"?

    I haven't seen the movie, but I suspect that has more to do with Shatner than with Esperanto.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  103. The languages that matter by unixisc · · Score: 1

    English is the only important language... you go right ahead and believe that

    Okay, as someone who worked in Si Valley in the last decade - and I see no reason for that to have changed - the main languages that matter alongside English in the industry were/are Mandarin (maybe some Cantonese), Korean (to satisfy the hordes of Samsung, LG & Hynix), and Japanese. Oh, and Russian too, since Moscow is a major tech center, and Russian is the 2nd language in Israel

    Anybody who thinks that languages like French, Arabic or German are anywhere near as relevant is fooling themselves. Spanish & Portuguese are there, for the Latin American market.

  104. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    And yet if you weren't around, they wouldn't have been speaking English, would they? It's quite common for a group of people whose native language is $PICK_A_LANGUAGE to switch to English as soon as a single English-speaking person shows up. They aren't doing it to communicate with each other better - they're doing it because a hell of a lot of people whose first language is English simply cannot be arsed to learn a second language, or simply have passed the stage where they CAN learn a second language with any sort of proficiency.

    It's a shame, because being able to communicate in two or more languages helps protect against the ravages of Alzheimers

    Bilingual people with Alzheimer's outperformed single-language speakers in short- and long-term memory tasks, even though scans showed more severe deterioration in brain metabolism among the bilingual participants, the scientists said.

    The ability to speak two languages appears to provide the brain with more resilience to withstand damage from Alzheimer's, said lead researcher Dr. Daniela Perani, a professor of psychology at Vita-Salute San Raffaele University in Milan.

    The more often a person swapped between two languages during their lifetime, the more capable their brains became of switching to alternate pathways that maintained thinking skills even as Alzheimer's damage accumulated, the researchers found.

    Previous studies have shown that lifelong bilingualism can delay the onset of dementia by as much as five years, Perani said. However, no one has yet examined what causes that effect in the brain.

    The bilingual people dramatically outscored monolingual speakers on memory tests, scoring three to eight times higher, on average.

    Bilingual people achieved these scores even though scans of their brains revealed more signs of cerebral hypometabolism—a characteristic of Alzheimer's in which the brain becomes less efficient at converting glucose into energy.

    The brain scans also provided a clue why this might be. People who were bilingual appeared to have better functional connectivity in frontal brain regions, which allowed them to maintain better thinking despite their Alzheimer's, Perani said.

    Constantly using two languages appears to make the brain work harder. During a lifetime this causes structural changes to the brain, creating a "neural reserve" that renders the bilingual brain more resistant against aging, Perani said.

    Bilingualism also sets up a person for better "neural compensation," in which the brain copes with its own degeneration and loss of neurons by finding alternative pathways through which to function, she said.

    Maybe the decreased brain capabilities of unilingual people is a factor contributing to both Brexit and Trumpism? Certainly when people can communicate outside their local linguistic community they have more opportunities to be exposed to new ideas. Plus imagine the money that can be saved by delaying Alzheimers, if you need a financial incentive?

    Like taking kids to cancer wards to discourage their smoking, maybe we can take them to old age homes to show the benefits of a second language. Old age homes are depressing enough - we should be doing what we can to delay entry just out of kindness.

    Maybe it's time to bring back foreign language training as part of the core curriculum in both countries?

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  105. Re:Interesting by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    It is true that if you visit France and appear to be a native English speaker, lots of people will pretend they don't speak it. Just practice asking, "Do you speak Russian?" first and then they'll answer you in English.

    Many decades ago there was a US TV show called Candid Camera that taped people's reactions to impossible/uncomfortable situations using a hidden camera. One episode featured a young woman with a VERY heavy suitcase seeking help in handling it in Paris. The woman was a native Parisian. The passersby she stopped pretended not to understand her French.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  106. Re:Classic French politician. by fred6666 · · Score: 1

    This is for TV (and radio). This way they can cut the answer in the language of their TV channel. Sometimes the question get asked by a French-speaking journalist first and the same question will be repeated in English.
    Nothing controversial, or even surprising here.

  107. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

    Haitian Creole (a local variant of French).

    Hatian Creole is not mutually intelligible with French.

    In West Africa, many people speak French, but few of them speak it as their mother tongue.

  108. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by loonycyborg · · Score: 1

    Russian writing is a lot more phonetic than English. Rules are a lot more logical, to the point you actually have a chance to pronounce a word properly based only on how it's written without knowing it. While English is full of silly rules like 'i' for some reason reading like 'ay' in some context and like 'i' in others.

  109. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by tsqr · · Score: 1

    And yet if you weren't around, they wouldn't have been speaking English, would they?

    That is what we call "an assumption", and it has the additional attribute of being entirely unrelated to the question of whether English is losing importance. I have no idea what they would have been speaking if I wasn't there, and neither do you; maybe they prefer Klingon. I can tell you, though, that the folks from Sweden I mentioned were speaking English among themselves before we introduced ourselves to them; if they'd been conversing in Swedish (or Klingon), we wouldn't have participated.

    As for my personal language skills, I am able to limp along in Spanish. Unfortunately, not a language of much use in the countries I mentioned. But your snippet on the benefits of bilingualism makes me wonder if there's a similar benefit associated with being conversant in multiple programming languages.

  110. Lol, fuck france by YoungManKlaus · · Score: 1

    For real, just look at Eurovision ... _everyone_ talks in English except the French tard who gets called for the numbers.

  111. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    As far as translating English into local languages, I agree. I doubt many local languages will ever provide large enough data sets for translation from those languages to be any good.

    It was in `98 I tried to speak to a Chinese student on the bus and she smiled and bowed a couple times speaking Chinese and then pulled out a phone-sized computer and started speaking into it, and the computer explained that she didn't speak English but had a translator device. It worked pretty well. We have lots of students that don't speak English. But only from China. Nobody else has advanced enough language support to get away with it, even now.

  112. Re:Interesting by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Under narrow enough preconditions I'm sure it is even true.

  113. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    I can't speak for Arabic, but Mandarin is fairly easy to type with modern input methods. You can even draw it onto your touchscreen (or onto your trackpad) if you're hardcore.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  114. Re:Interesting by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    But in terms of the future of the EU [English] is by far not the most important.

    Why?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  115. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Would you say that people who want to enter the music field need to know at least elementary Italian?

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  116. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    If those French-speaking countries get out of poverty and become financially important players, they're going to have a lot of English speakers. Dominant languages have momentum.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  117. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by blindseer · · Score: 1

    It is irrelevant what their mother tongue is, it matters what common language all the parties in the conversation speak.

    When I visited Germany it was quite common to find people that spoke English. I spoke no German but I had a translation booklet. I know some Spanish but found no use for it. When in the vicinity of a major airport the signs had both German and English, because English is the mandated language for international pilots. Most everyone around the American military bases spoke English well enough to do business, there were even English language radio and TV stations. Even the French guy at the wine shop in Germany spoke English, which might have had something to do with its vicinity to the EU central bank in Frankfurt.

    OPEC member nations use English as its official language, even though none of the member nations have it as their "mother tongue".

    International banking is done in English. International air travel is in English. International oil trade is in English. English is the closest thing we have to a universal language right now. If some EU snob thinks that the "brexit" is going to diminish the importance of the English language in international trade then he's going to find himself getting corrected quickly. The UK may be leaving the EU but that does not mean that trade to the UK stops. Trade with other English speaking nations also continues.

    When I visited my Army buddy in Germany I made a conscious effort to not look "American" since I knew Americans are often targets for violence and pickpockets. I did not wear any blue jeans, only khaki style slacks. I wore Doc Marten boots. The coat I wore was an Australian/Western style duster. I guess it worked because when in the airport security line to head back home I was in line behind a British family, which I thought might lead the people to at least ask what language I spoke when it came to my turn. The lady with the metal detector started to talk to me in German. When I replied in English she said, "Oh, you're English!" Yep, I'm "English". I'm of German ancestry so this tall and thin guy, with (then) jet black hair, and snow white skin follows a group of Brits I guess I looked more German than English. They were shorter, rounder, with a hint of red to their brown hair and faint freckles on their skin. That was the most memorable moment of knowing I fit in, people generally seemed to assume I spoke German but more often than not they switched to English when I tried to speak German back.

    Another memorable moment was going to a restaurant to sit and have a drink while walking with my friend. We were greeted by a rather curvacious waitress and shown a table. We ordered in broken German and paid for our drinks. When we wanted a second drink a rather flat chested waitress started to take our order but she ran off suddenly. We were confused for a minute until she returned with the buxom one which spoke to us in English. I was doubly pleased with this, I didn't have to try to speak German and I got another look at the pretty girl.

    That was another thing that struck me. Even though I apparently looked "German" enough that people thought nothing of it until I looked confused when spoken to, they switched immediately to English. I thought that given the proximity to France and Italy that people might first try French or Italian, maybe even Spanish which I studied in high school and college and thought I might have to rely upon. Nope, English was their immediate fall back.

    I recall seeing a recent video on the French election in which the commenter made the observation that while the video was in English he knew it might get a lot of views in France since 40% of the people in France spoke English. So, I suspect even the French in Germany speak English. In every EU nation at least 20% of the population speak English, perhaps not as their "mother tongue" but they do speak it. A quick Wikipedia search tells me that roughly half of the EU population speaks English.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  118. Reality check by TheSync · · Score: 1

    The international technical conferences I go to in Europe and Asia are held in English. IETF RFCs are written in English. Internationally, pilots talk with air traffic control in English.

    Even if the UK disappeared, English would still be relevant in the EU.

    Let's be clear, Mandarin has 1.05 billion speakers. English has 1.01 million speakers. That is #1 and #2 worldwide.

    French is way, way down the league tables, at 272 million speakers. Below Hindi, Spanish, Arabic, Malay, and Russian.

    Over the next 20 years, French may gain another 20-30 million speakers in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, but English will gain similar numbers if not more from Nigeria and India.

  119. Re:Juncker Programming by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    Why? Because it's not "stdio.h" (standard input output), but "esstd.g" (entrée sortie standard). I thought that was self evident.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  120. Re:German by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Those people don't need to learn English, they already learned it in school, and likely French, too.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  121. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by Kjella · · Score: 2

    Number of 2nd language English speakers: 510B
    Number of 2nd language French speakers: 192M

    Assuming the B stands for billions I'm sure many would like to know how far our galactic empire stretches. Realistically yeah I agree, if people speak a second language it's by far likely to be English.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  122. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

    Thailand is neither a member of the francophonie, nor was it ever colonized/occupied by European conquerors.
    That is one reason why the Thai consider themselves so special.

    While most Thai learn English, many speak several local languages and understand or even speak Mandarin.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  123. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Basically every 'arab' in France speaks French. What is your point?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  124. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    if there's a similar benefit associated with being conversant in multiple programming languages.
    Of course it is.

    However as most languages evolve into multiple paradigm languages (object oriented + functional + generic) and have higher level concepts in the libraries, this is less needed in our days (considering you are fluent in Java/Scala or C++).

    Around 1995 I was on a talk in Frankfurt, Germany, by Bjarne Stroustoup.
    His final words were something like:
    "However everyone of us should learn more programming languages.
    And natural languages, of course!"

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  125. Re:So.. what language will be the lingua franca th by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Why you believe that the Latin alphabet is easier for an outsider to learn than e.g. Sanskrit or Khmer or Arabic for you, is beyond me.
    There are a few complicated alphabets, but if a 5 year old child of a camel herder, can learn the Arabic script in about a year, it says quite a lot about you that you believe you or any other adult westerner is less capable than a 5 year child.

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  126. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by cgriffiths · · Score: 1

    or simply have passed the stage where they CAN learn a second language with any sort of proficiency.

    One of the greatest myths of second language acquisition... Personally I learnt my second language to native fluency as an adult, starting my studies at 18 years old. However I have also met previously monolingual people who have learnt that second language in their 50s and 60s and are perfectly fluent by any reasonable measure. There is no cut-off point for learning a language unless your mental state is deteriorating rapidly such as Alzheimer's or another debilitating illness.

  127. Re: Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by godel_56 · · Score: 1

    Mother tongue huh? Well, my mother tongue is german, and I feel like 90% of germans around me, including myself, speak english most of the time. Even at the bar, because there is usually someone from the UK, who doesn't speak german quite as good, hanging out with us. Frankly, you're being ridiculous.

    In Australia the local SBS TV channel sometimes broadcasts crime dramas from places like Sweden and Germany in the original language, and I've been surprised that when they have to interrogate someone from a different country they switch to English without extra comment or exposition.

    I think Australia has one of the lowest percentages of people speaking a second language, but considering our geographical position, which one should we choose? Chinese might make sense, but due to its tonal nature of verbal speech and the foreign characters it's bloody hard to learn as an adult if you don't have a gift for languages.

  128. Re:Classic French politician. by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Not like there's any real difference between the two...
    Then I wonder: who is the bigger idiot, you or him?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  129. Re:Classic French politician. by quax · · Score: 1

    "Not like there's any real difference between the two..."

    You should get out more. Travel the world a bit.

  130. Re:Interesting by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Why?

    When you want to speak to a group of nations it's best to speak in a language they can understand.

    Over 50% of the population of Europe speak English.
    Only 20% speak French.

    One language grants you an audience of an additional 220 million people.

  131. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by mysticgoat · · Score: 1

    French is one of the official languages of Mali, which was once a French colony. There are numerous native languages with official status. English is NOT an official language.

    However in Mali English is the common language for trade, business, and technology.

    The same seems to be true for the other impoverished, post-french-colony nations.

    English rulz.

  132. Re:The only reasonable list of standard language by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    So what? >50% of the population of India speaks Hindi. And the primary powers of their national government are native speakers. I'm not saying it's right that minorities there don't rise in power, I'm only pointing out facts and categorizing them as best as I can.

    Not everyone in the United States speaks English natively, some don't speak it at all. There are people growing up speaking Spanish, French Creole, Swiss German, one of dozens of Tribal Languages, etc. But I hope we can agree that the people who operate the civilian government and military of the United States are speaking English every day.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  133. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Every child in China has learned at least a few years of English since the mid 1980s, putting it somewhere around 500 million people who at least understand it somewhat - in one country alone. Add in India, and you easily have over a billion people who are somewhat capable in English right there. What India and China does basically dictates how "worldwide percentages go" and since English is THE chosen second language for those countries - it will continue to dominate the rest of the world. No matter what the French (or francophiles) desire.

    Try to get around India or China speaking just French or German. Then try it with just English. It's orders of magnitude easier in English - heck, even the road signs are in Mandarin and English!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  134. Re:About the EU, not the world by Cederic · · Score: 1

    it is likely that this will at least be solvable by throwing more money at interpreters

    Ah, about that. The EU has something of a funding crisis hitting in 2019.

  135. Jean-Claude Juncker is Losing Importance by KayakFun · · Score: 2

    Jean-Claude Juncker and the other eurocrats have proven to be so self-centered and closed to criticism about their inefficient monthly moving back and forth between Brussels and Strassbourg, their huge salaries, huge allowances and free pension schemes, expansion into former USSR and middle East territory, inability to make southern countries to behave themselves financially, turning the border control in a ferryman operation to make human traffickers rich, and much more, that the only way to change the EU is to step out of it, and start a New EU.

    The UK is the first of the net-contributing countries, a few more and the EU goes bankrupt. The New (or North) EU will consist of the net-contributing old-EU countries.

    This message is brought to you from the Netherlands.

  136. He's from Luxembourg really ... by golodh · · Score: 1
    And he's the guy who said he'd help Ohio and Texas secede from the Union unless Mr. Trump stopped encouraging Brexit.

    He's also the man who, after a working dinner with the British Prime Minister called her "delusional" and "living in a different galaxy".

    In public.

    And whose staffers leaked extensively about this working dinner the day afterwards.

    Yes, that Mr. Juncker. His words are definitely to be taken with a grain of salt.

    More so after after a few glasses of wine and a copious meal.

  137. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Also true to a slightly lesser extent when we visited Amsterdam a few years back.

    I call bullshit. I've never met a person in Holland who didn't speak English.
    Hell many of them correct mine ... embarrassingly enough. :-)

  138. Re:Junke speaks English by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Well Spanish is the next most spoken language

    Well at least this horribly incorrect fact (Spanish is #5) is consistent with the rest of the wrongness of your post.

  139. Re:Classic French politician. by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Not like there's any real difference between the two...

    You must be from America. Specifically some of the dumb fuck parts of California where people can't even get through school.

  140. Re:Interesting by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    Citation needed

    http://google.com/

  141. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

    Briton who actually can be arsed to learn the local languages here.
    As often as not, when locals learn where I'm from and break out into English, they are doing it to use me as practice, not because they feel sorry for me.

    --
    No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  142. Nobody is listening. by runnymedecourt · · Score: 1

    Who gives a toss what Drunker says?

  143. Re:Juncker probably the most unpopular man in the by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

    Assuming the B stands for billions I'm sure many would like to know how far our galactic empire stretches.

    ShanghaiBill didn't say human speakers. Perhaps you were unaware that mice speak English, as shown in documentaries such as Cinderella.

  144. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by michael_wojcik · · Score: 1

    Plus the set of keywords is small and easy to learn anyway

    Yes, and they have nothing to do with English grammar, or word inflections, or orthography (once you memorize that small set of keywords), or any of the other things that are important to learning English as a natural language.

    The relevance of programming-language keywords to learning English is scarcely more the relevance of Greek letters in mathematical notation is to learning Greek.

    Now, learning to read comments written in English in source code has some relevance to learning programming, since so much extant source has comments in English; and so some extent the same can be said for identifiers. But again there's a mighty gulf between having basic reading competency in a language and being able to speak or write it. I've had reading courses in French, but I never learned to speak it or even really understand any of the spoken language; and similarly the two years I had of Japanese made me much better at reading it than writing or speaking.

  145. English has been the international language... by martinfb · · Score: 1

    English has been the generally accepted international language for a very long time.
    Does the world really need to stop and change this now?!
    Are there not more pressing global issues at hand?!
    Would someone please pull Mr Juncker's head out of the sand?!

    Sounds to me more like a stab at flinging contempt at the UK for BrExit!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  146. Re:Classic French politician. by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    No, I'm from Canada, and I was mindlessly ranting.
    Glad it made your day though.

    --
    I tend to rant.
  147. Re:Classic French politician. by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    I'd love to visit Europe someday, but my list of places to visit start in much more remote locations. Seeing as I live in Canada, I don't actually need to leave the country for the most part. I'd rather die to a grizzly bear than some religiously fulled fanatics.

    --
    I tend to rant.
  148. Re:Classic French politician. by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    Out of the 4 people who bashed my head in for my out-of-line comment, yours was the most insightful. Thank you.
    I might actually look into it, but for the record, my comment was 100% written with about 2 minutes of research time and rantMode set to true.

    --
    I tend to rant.
  149. Re:Classic French politician. by quax · · Score: 1

    You'd be happy to learn that the risk of dying by grizzly in Canada is about as high as the risk of dying from a terrorist attack in Europe.

    I live in the GTA and will fly with the whole family to Germany in the summer.

  150. Re:Fortunately (or unforunately), IT will affect t by petervandervos · · Score: 1

    Not when they enter it, but after a while they have learned a number of Italian words. http://www.musictheory.org.uk/...

  151. Re:Classic French politician. by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

    I don't think you understood my point.

    Generally, I enjoy seclusion from the population.

    --
    I tend to rant.
  152. Re:Classic French politician. by quax · · Score: 1

    Oh right, didn't read this properly. No much to worry about in European remote places (no bears anyhow, but wolfs are making a comeback).

  153. Re:Interesting by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    Sarcasm?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  154. Re:Interesting by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Je ne comprends pas

  155. Re:Interesting by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    You said English is "not the most important." But then you gave reasons that seem to support that English is the most important.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  156. Re:Interesting by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Timing and context is everything.

    English wasn't important for the duration of the one speech that Junker directed at the population of France. As the French election is over, and as it's the most widely spoken language in Europe, it's important again.

  157. Re:Interesting by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    got it

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."