Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Are There Any Alternatives To Android Or iOS?

An anonymous Slashdot reader is asking whether or not there are any alternatives to Android or iOS smartphones: Like most of us, I've owned a few smartphones over time, ranging from a Nokia E71 to a Samsung Android phone and now, an Apple iPhone. It is close to phone upgrade time, and I've been reviewing the features that I use on my phone. When I think honestly about it, the only features I really need are:

1. Phone calls (loads of conference calls, for which I use a wired headset with a microphone)
2. SMS Messaging (unlimited on my plan)
3. Navigation (very important, and is probably the most-used app on my phone)
4. Occasional internet browsing

All of this could be done by the Nokia E71, when Nokia Maps was a thing. If I want to move away from Apple, Google and the like, do I have any options now? Are there any trustable (and by trustable, I mean avoiding unknown Chinese manufacturers) phones in the market today that could do all four and (ideally) have better battery life than one day?

176 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. First Post? by 14erCleaner · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, there are no good alternatives.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re: First Post? by Dracos · · Score: 1

      Root your phone, then you'll be able to remove all the crapware.

    2. Re:First Post? by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      But my wife just got a new unlocked Android Moto E for $120, and is using it on Republic Wireless for $20/month, unlimited calling and texts but no data other than wi-fi.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    3. Re:First Post? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Informative

      iOS and Android dominate the market today, but there are a few alternatives with potential to escape from the app/spyware hell. Silent Circle make the Blackphone, which is Android-based but with a heavy emphasis on security and privacy compared to most of the major off-the-shelf brands. Perhaps more interesting, Purism are working on the Librem 5 and recently beat their funding target by a comfortable margin, which potentially means a privacy and security focussed phone that runs a different platform entirely could be available in the not too distant future.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    4. Re:First Post? by countach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As an iPhone user, what is this app/spyware hell of which you speak?

    5. Re:First Post? by leonbev · · Score: 1

      Seriously, the answer really is no. BlackBerry OS, Windows Phone, and Palm OS all died a long time ago.

    6. Re:First Post? by Xenx · · Score: 2

      If we're talking about the apps that get around the permissions system, iPhone users aren't immune to it. It's not as rampant, but it's there. If we're talking about the fact that it's more and more common for apps to track the user and record info, then they're just as vulnerable as any other smartphone.

    7. Re:First Post? by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      They say it's "unlocked" but just try using a Republic Wireless phone on another network.

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    8. Re:First Post? by Sebby · · Score: 1

      How about the "We're Apple and we'll dictate how you use your own device that you paid us for" hell

      --

      AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    9. Re:First Post? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      ASOP or Lineage OS, delete the stuff you don't want, build. It's the best and only option.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re:First Post? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      LMGTFY. Install a "social app", approve it one time, and it can easily continue to record/film/report whilst open - and not as you expect.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    11. Re: First Post? by BLToday · · Score: 1

      Which Samsung phone? I’m looking at a cheap smartphone when traveling overseas and Samsung phones can be found pretty cheaply.

    12. Re:First Post? by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      The phone is unlocked, meaning it takes a SIM. She also had to buy a Republic SIM for $5, but could switch if she wants to. So far the quality and service are both fine, and it's hard to knock the cost.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    13. Re: First Post? by dbialac · · Score: 1

      iOS is ugly, the iPhone X display looks like something from There I Fixed It, and iPhones have no headphone jack. Android is a giant spyware platform for Google.

    14. Re:First Post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The hell of having an email client, web browser, thousands of apps, amazing battery life and incredible security? Oh yes, the horror. I assume you whine that you cannot install emacs on your fridge, too?

    15. Re:First Post? by doom · · Score: 1

      No, there are no good alternatives.

      Except not using a "smart" phone.

      A fate worse than death.

    16. Re:First Post? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Sorry, not available in my country (the US)

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    17. Re: First Post? by shm · · Score: 1

      Tizen was quite buggy and it looks practically the same as Android. Couldn't root it either unless you ponied up for a developer unit. I had the Z1, the entry level phone.

    18. Re: First Post? by dmesg0 · · Score: 1

      Disable the application. You can disable any pre-installed application by standard Android means or any application using Package Disable Pro app.

      BTW, I've yet to see a system app with pop-up ads on Samsung, are you sure it is one indeed? What phone is it and what carrier?

    19. Re: First Post? by dmesg0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think rooting is a good idea nowadays. It prevents updates and you can achieve most things rooting allowed in the past without it.

    20. Re: First Post? by jimbo · · Score: 1

      I agree completely, I was gobsmacked when I saw I default app had ads and a paid version.
      I still use it though, so I go to Settings->Apps->Peel Remote->Notifications set to Blocked. Fixed!

      I've had to do this for a large number of Apps to keep interaction with the phone on my terms, not the other way around. It can tell me when I get a call or a message, the rest I look at when I please.

    21. Re: First Post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Assuming that there is a root available at all. I've yet to find a way of rooting my LG V10, I see methods online that work for other people, but I've yet to find one that works for me. And, I don't even have a Windows computer to try some of the methods.

      What we really need is some sort of a law requiring that phones have some method of gaining root access on at least a per boot basis, if not longer. I bought my phone, I shouldn't be stuck with a semi-functional phone in perpetuity because the manufacturer wants it locked.

    22. Re: First Post? by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      Which Samsung phone? I’m looking at a cheap smartphone when traveling overseas and Samsung phones can be found pretty cheaply.

      Moto e4 for Verizon Prepaid at Walmart for $40 and a $4 unlock code from ebay. Removable battery and SD card slot up to 128GB. Near stock 7.1.1.

    23. Re:First Post? by Woldscum · · Score: 1

      Moto e4 for Verizon Prepaid at Walmart for $40 and a $4 unlock code from ebay. I just turned on one with AT&T. Search on youtube for how to. The other network prepaid versions of the e4 do not have the fingerprint scanner. Amazon sells a lock screen ad version for $99 and $130 clean unlocked one.

    24. Re:First Post? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Pretty much not at this time but Google have proven to be such deceitful political manipulators and control freaks, I expect Linux smart phones to start appearing under most brands in the next bunch of years. The can simply skip the Android Java layer and tell Google to go fuck itself, it is bound to happen, as the manufacturers seek more control over their market and that means excluding Google, they deserve to be excluded. It is inevitable, just a matter of time, some hints but likely at least a some years. Simply buy second hand and screw them, make sure you buy a phone with a user removable battery, that is easy to root and you are done. Avoid phones that run hot, that really shortens the life of electronic components. Expect a push from foreign governments that do not trust US corporations, they will simply demand quotes for government supply of Linux phones and drive that market, then tenders would be years in advance to allow development time and they are free of US corporations, especially after Don Don the orange orangutan little speech about the importance of US corporate domination of the entire planet, how to many enemies, stupid is as stupid does. The damage that little speech did to US tech companies in foreign countries, ain't no one going to trust them now.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    25. Re:First Post? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have a OnePlus one phone, battery life was very bad after 1-2 years. It would drain in less then half a day, reboot unexpectedly, it was bad.
      I unlocked the bootloader, which is easy with an opo, and installed lineage OS without all google services. This means no app store either. You can only install FOSS software using F-Droid.
      Now the battery lasts > 2 days with one charge and when I close the apps the processor is in deep sleep mode all the time. I have full control over my phone finally.
      For messaging you can use the Riot app. All other things I use via the mobile website.

    26. Re:First Post? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it's exploited in the wild, but a couple of months ago there was a vulnerability in XPC. This is the framework that all sandboxed iOS / macOS applications use for communicating between privileged and unprivileged components, so is useable by any sandboxed app. Any malicious app that you had installed until that update would have been able to compromise the kernel.

      There have also been a couple of GPU driver bugs that I know of that allow kernel privilege escalation.

      The iOS sandboxing support is pretty solid overall, but it does rely on the kernel not having security vulnerabilities.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    27. Re:First Post? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Do you know that thing where you have to upgrade your apps or their online elements stop working properly, but then you have to upgrade iOS or your apps stop working properly, but if you upgrade iOS on your device that is more than a few months old then your whole device stops working properly? It's related to the one where your app prompts you to install a new version, but afterwards you find that the thing you already paid for and were happy hasn't had bug fixes or performance improvements but instead now has ads and in-app purchases and some new bugs that stop it working properly, and you can't roll it back.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    28. Re: First Post? by Shoten · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Root your phone, then you'll be able to remove all the crapware.

      Actually, no.

      The problem with this is that the worst of the crapware (like Adups' garbage) is tied into the OS itself. So while, theoretically you could remove it...you're talking about altering the OS itself at a very low level. And that brings a host of other problems based around maintenance. New Android version from the manufacturer to address vulnerabilities? Get ready to hack the OS all over again and perform surgery to remove the bad parts...assuming that they are where they were last time. Have a problem with something not working right? Could be from the changes you made...but it's hard to tell and good luck getting any technical support at all. And all of this first requires that a person be a guru on the inner workings of Android, which is a pretty tall order; I would think that someone asking about phone variants out there isn't one of these people, because everyone who is a bona fide Android developer (developer of Android itself...not apps for the Android OS) is pretty plugged-in to the cellphone industry.

      There is a difference between "technically possible" and "actually feasible."

      --

      For your security, this post has been encrypted with ROT-13, twice.
    29. Re: First Post? by grub · · Score: 1

      If you don't like Apple Maps, install Google Maps, Waze, etc. Personally I use Apple Maps as I've yet to have any problems with it.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    30. Re:First Post? by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Funny, I have an Xperia X so I'd be interested in Sailfish X. Couple of problems - currently no Bluetooth (among other issues), and "Current availability: EU, Norway, Switzerland".
      The Xperia X bluetooth hasn't been great anyway, but I don't understand the geo-blocking.

    31. Re: First Post? by Maritz · · Score: 1

      A battery that slows your phone down as it ages. Nice.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    32. Re: First Post? by dmesg0 · · Score: 1

      I do run Mobiwol (no root firewall) when I need it (e.g. data restricted network). So far it worked fine for me.
      Otherwise I just disable everything I don't need with Package Disabler Pro.

    33. Re:First Post? by dmesg0 · · Score: 1

      In most other countries 20$/mo (or even less) gives you unlimited calls/texts and many GBs of data.

    34. Re:First Post? by vm · · Score: 1

      I used Psiphon to connect to the Sailfish X store from Germany & buy the OS without a hitch. The flashing is somewhat obnoxious, however, so I would recommend skipping the OTA option and use Sony's flashing util instead to save yourself a lot of time. I haven't tried Bluetooth but the couple of Android apps I've installed for testing work flawlessly. The standby time is phenomenal, too. I can't think of any app I would need that requires Google Services to work and I only use Bluetooth in my car so I hadn't considered that yet. And the change log for the open source version says BT has been working since Sept 29.

    35. Re:First Post? by Xenx · · Score: 1

      I couldn't bring to mind any specific examples myself, but I knew they existed. But, that's exactly it. They do well enough, but aren't perfect.

    36. Re: First Post? by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Yeap; modern civilisation is doomed by a single flaw, don't try to fix it, simply start up a new civilisation on mars with that single flaw fixed.

    37. Re:First Post? by ChocoIncognito · · Score: 1

      psssssst, your Apple device is sacrificing usability and power control for the illusion of a longer battery life. Rooted Android users have been tweaking their CPU/GPU clocks for better battery to performance ratios for a long time now. But it's hard to look at the facts when you're too busy being snide on the internet, huh?

    38. Re: First Post? by Derwood5555 · · Score: 1

      Get a Pixel or Pixel 2. Default Android has no crapware.

    39. Re:First Post? by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      Well, clearly we should move. I mean, we're not getting the data we deserve!

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    40. Re:First Post? by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll look into giving it a try!

  2. windows phone? by rogoshen1 · · Score: 2

    You could probably snag a Nokia Lumia from target or amazon or something and save several hundred dollars; provided those are actual needs.

    1. Re:windows phone? by Lije+Baley · · Score: 2

      My $50 Lumia 640 with WP8.1 could do all of that beautifully, and works with band 12 on Tmobile...except the web browser was falling too far behind for my needs. So I updated to WP10. It has more features and the browser works much better, though the UI was a bit of step backwards in usability, mostly around things getting smaller and more complicated. I have no issue with missing apps. I may pick up a used Idol4s when they get under $100.

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
    2. Re:windows phone? by DogDude · · Score: 2

      In what way was the UI "a step backward"? It's largely the same, but with some new features from 8.whatever.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:windows phone? by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I have actually used a Windows Phone, and surprisingly I liked the OS fine. However for me Waze is the best navigation app, and Google stopped updating it for Windows Phone when they took it over so it was pretty buggy and unlikely to get fixed. Here We Go may be ok, but since OP said that navigation was important I'd hesitate to recommend it.
      To test, though, you can get an unlocked Lumia for $50 or so, so it's a pretty low risk evaluation.

  3. Windows phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Windows phone... ho you asked for a good alternative !

  4. Tizen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tizen. Samsung Z2/Z3 you can get one on Amazon. They don't have a large amount of apps, but they have all of the things you really need.

  5. Not anymore, anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Happy owner of a WinPhone here. Dated, sure. Fewer apps, sure. But compared to the iOS and Android phones I'm helping other people with on a daily basis, I find it easier to use. But I may be biased... by my better phone.

    1. Re:Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So much better that Microsoft has dropped the platform altogether. Bravo.

      It had potential, don't get me wrong; and if Microsoft hadn't screwed every single pooch they encountered on their journey with Windows Phone, I'm sure it would be a real winner, but...

      Its dead, Jim.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    2. Re:Not anymore, anyway by DogDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Windows Phone 10 is supported until sometime in 2020. There's no reason not to continue to use Windows Phones for another years, at least.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    3. Re:Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because the smartest and most successful people in history have all tied their hopes and dreams to a dead horse to achieve greatness, right?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    4. Re:Not anymore, anyway by DogDude · · Score: 5, Funny

      What in the fuck are you talking about? "Hopes and dreams?" I'm talking about a phone.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    5. Re:Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 2

      What in the fuck are you talking about? "Hopes and dreams?" I'm talking about a phone.

      I'm talking about behavior patterns of intelligent and successful individuals, and adopting a dead platform is not one of those patterns.

      You're going to have to switch platforms in 2 years, one way or the other. End of life is when you start moving off of a platform, not when you adopt it; the 2.5 years of "support" Microsoft has pledged Windows phone is intended to allow current users enough time to migrate to another solution.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    6. Re:Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If all you use is the features that come with the phone and maybe a handful of free apps, more power to you, have at it. If you really want to keep using a device that's a year or more out of support (there are only 2 years left, remember), especially running a Microsoft OS with no security patches, go right ahead. Sure, it'll "work", it'll power on and at least the default functionality will probably be there; if you ever need to restore after they kill support, your apps will be lost, of course. I wouldn't really consider simply turning on and booting to be "working", when the device is intended to do so much more than that and those functions will necessarily break when Microsoft quits supporting them.

      If you use any apps, you clearly haven't considered that you might need some time to find suitable replacements, or you really don't actually use them enough to care about potential substantial workflow changes. Having migrated from Blackberry to iOS to Android, I've been around the block a couple times; if you have some app that does some function a certain way, it takes time to sift through all the available apps on your new platform that perform that function, in order to find one that has the options you need and works the way you need it to.

      Again, though, if all you care about is the most basic of functionality, sure, stick with Windows Phone. That's all you'll have when MS pulls the plug and, really, you don't even need a smartphone for those functions; most feature phones will perform those tasks, including GPS now, with multiple days of battery life.

      For someone who actually uses a smartphone as a smartphone, adopting a dead platform is simply beyond idiotic and suggesting it as an option is either ignorant, malicious, or both.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    7. Re:Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      As long as the camera works, I'd say keep it for that; I kept an old feature phone that had an excellent 2MP camera with proper OIS and autofocus, simply because it still made for better prints than 4 and 5MP cameras that were available on phones until just a few years ago. I've got nothing against using what works for you, or sticking with the dying platform because you're already there, of course; that would just be silly. It sounds like you might already be considering other options at this point, anyway.

      Hopefully, the camera functionality will keep working after MS fully drops support, because yes, the cameras on those phones are incredible and it would be sad to see them just break because some company, not even the manufacturer, flipped a switch.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    8. Re:Not anymore, anyway by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      Happy owner of a WinPhone here. Dated, sure. Fewer apps, sure. But compared to the iOS and Android phones I'm helping other people with on a daily basis, I find it easier to use. But I may be biased... by my better phone.

      Windows phone is a brick without a Microsoft account. You literally can't do anything on it without an account and with one everything is online with no recourse. It's impossible to do something as simple as configure a local address book or simple calendar that is not forcibly uploaded to Microsoft.

      Neither can you use wifi or devices local GPS without being forced to contribute to crowdsourced location bullshit and tell Microsoft where you are. It is literally impossible.

      Windows Phone is probably worse than Android /w Google play molestation from a privacy perspective while being even more locked down than iPhones.

      Don't even consider it.

    9. Re: Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      They also didn't tie their thoughts and activities to dying platforms or ideas. I think you missed that point in my post.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    10. Re:Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Sure, if you've got nothing else going on.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    11. Re:Not anymore, anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is not true, Windows 10 Mobile allows you to do everything local to the phone without an account. Heck even apps update without an account in the store, and you can install "free" apps from the store without the account. If anything its the only mobile OS that DOESN'T require you to have an account to use fully.

      Google still requires you to have an account to even use the play store...

      Either way, this might have been true in 8.0/8.1 days but with Windows 10 Mobile (probably just going to be Windows 10 S (ARM) in the near future) you can get away with no accounts signed in.

    12. Re: Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Outdated but still effective for its intended purpose, yes. Windows phone is no longer effective for its intended purpose for most legitimate smartphone use cases; for many, it simply never was, in large part because Microsoft kept too tight of a grip on it and was too overbearing.

      Successful people use what works and stick with it for as long as it will continue working for the foreseeable future so, yes, most of them do end up sticking with outdated (but still fully functional and, likely, supported by someone) tech. But those same successful people get off of dead platforms (and I'm not simply speaking in terms of phones here) as quickly as possible once they learn of the platform's impending demise.

      We're half a year into Windows Phone being at that stage in its lifecycle; nobody with a propensity for making successful life choices is choosing to use it at this point.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    13. Re:Not anymore, anyway by aix+tom · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about behavior patterns of intelligent and successful individuals, and adopting a dead platform is not one of those patterns

      Yeah. That's why George R.R. Martin will never have any success with that funny books he has written on an that old typewriter-platform.

    14. Re:Not anymore, anyway by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      I have a win phone and it was a big mistake. Edge only, massive battery drain, no other good browser choices. Poor app choices, a lot of things on iphone.android just arent available despite all that noise they made about universal apps and if it works on pc it works on phone one os bullshit. I got an email from my bank they other day saying they are withdrawing their banking app from feb and it's not going to work anymore. One of the reasons I got it was the satnav layover from nokia maps but these maps are crap, there are years olds roads not listed, it cant find shit in the search and it has more than once sent me to the wrong place. I've been trying to stick it out because I don't want to shell out for a new phone but literally the only thing it does better is let me save my xbox screnshots and clips easier though its native xbox app. That is the sole area I would say it is better than the others but I don't really think it's worth it for that. Groove music player is another bag of shit app that there aren't really many better options for.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    15. Re:Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Typewriters aren't what I'd call a dead platform. You can still buy them new, get manufacturer support, and find replacement parts and ink ribbons for them. Old doesn't mean dead.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    16. Re: Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Please give specific example of what a Windows phone can't do right now.

      Have more than 2 years of remaining vendor support and an app store that hasn't mostly stopped seeing updates to major apps.

      Oh, wait, you asked for one; sorry, that was two, one of which was actually an issue raised by a Lumia 950 owner elsewhere in the thread Of course, you provided a few of your own: still hold a charge, USB Host Mode, connect to LTE networks, and properly render web pages (to which I'll add: run browsers that aren't using Edge's rendering and JS engines).

      I don't disagree that picking a Windows phone now isn't the best choice for most people. But you come off as a jackass.

      Well, that certainly is one way of looking at it, and perhaps you're right. Or, perhaps I simply grew weary of having to defend my position against someone who doesn't understand how to weigh options, risks, and advantages is various choices, y'know?

      Most successful people I know weigh options, risks, and advantages of various choices and don't make sweeping generalizations...

      Indeed, and this particular option carries the risk (a guarantee, actually) of lacking long-term support and a rapidly-degrading experience if you actually intend to use it as a smartphone. There was no sweeping generalization made, I never said Windows Phone is a horrible platform or that no good hardware was ever made to run it; on the contrary, I said it was a platform with potential, run into the ground and abandoned by its creator. I actually have some love for the poor thing, honestly; I just think it's a bad idea to suggest it as an option to someone looking for a phone they've held onto for 9 years, given vendor support will be ending in 2 and the store is already massively degraded because no vendors want to spend the time and money to keep their apps updated on a dying platform.

      but I'm an engineer who specializes in HPC so I could easily run with a different crowd than someone in IT support, web development or management/business.

      I see, an egotistical appeal to authority. What was it that you just said I was coming off as?

      (I'd be willing to bet you fall into one of those three)

      You could easily verify for yourself, but I'll save you the trouble. You're not entirely wrong; I actually cover two of the three, but that is not the sum total of my life experience, so it's hardly relevant here. Keep in mind that the management/business types are the whole reason you have a job in the first place; if we weren't successful, you'd be unemployed. Your high horse has a wounded knee.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    17. Re:Not anymore, anyway by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about behavior patterns of intelligent and successful individuals, and adopting a dead platform is not one of those patterns.

      lol. What a pile of bollocks to come out with.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    18. Re: Not anymore, anyway by Maritz · · Score: 1

      He's intelligent and successful, you can tell by his choice of smartphone OS.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    19. Re:Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      Someone doesn't understand the difference between long term success and nabbing a nice golden parachute on their way out the door of the company they just sunk, I think.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    20. Re:Not anymore, anyway by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      This is not true, Windows 10 Mobile allows you to do everything local to the phone without an account. Heck even apps update without an account in the store, and you can install "free" apps from the store without the account. If anything its the only mobile OS that DOESN'T require you to have an account to use fully.

      Google still requires you to have an account to even use the play store...

      Either way, this might have been true in 8.0/8.1 days but with Windows 10 Mobile (probably just going to be Windows 10 S (ARM) in the near future) you can get away with no accounts signed in.

      All of my comments are based on first hand experience with "windows phone" as parent indicated. I have never used Windows 10 Mobile and have no comment specific to it.

      I will add software can be installed on Android devices from any source. It is trivial to download free software from Google app store without an account or Google play services installed.

    21. Re:Not anymore, anyway by Lanthanide · · Score: 1

      My phone is coming up on 4 years old (HTC One M8).

      The battery life is now noticeably permanently degraded. It does mean that it's fairly quick to get back up to 100% charge, but it also fast to deplete.

      So keeping a phone for another 3 years will mean significant battery decay.

    22. Re:Not anymore, anyway by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      You should try googling windows 10 phone... you'll understand the hopes and dreams

    23. Re: Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      So I wouldn't recommend buying a new one - or spending ANY money on one - but if you have one with 10 on it or are handed a clean one for free...

      That's more or less my point. This entire discussion is predicated on a user looking for a platform to switch to; that is, getting a new phone.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    24. Re: Not anymore, anyway by ChrisHarshman · · Score: 1

      Actually, GRRM types his novels on a computer running DOS; he rather famously uses WordStar 4.0: http://teamcoco.com/video/george-r-r-martin-dos-program

    25. Re:Not anymore, anyway by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      Jesus, like he said, it's just a phone. Do you get all excited/upset when you have to buy a new microwave with the clock in a different place?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    26. Re: Not anymore, anyway by vm · · Score: 1

      why didn't you just replace the battery?

    27. Re:Not anymore, anyway by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      As long as microwave isn't running a phone-home-for-activation OS for which the manufacturer has already announced the end of support, no, I don't really care where the clock is as the microwave will still work in 2 years.

      That's a fair bit different than suggesting someone migrate to a platform that is already EOL, has an already deteriorating ecosystem, and will be unsupported and unable to activate or install apps in two years time. Especially when you're making that suggestion to someone who just told you they're looking to upgrade from their current 9 year old phone; clearly, they don't want to have to migrate again right away.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  6. Blackberry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Blackberries still work. And during the SONY hack, Blackberries were the fallback!

  7. For nav, use OpenStreetMaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    OSMAnd on Android allows offline navigation, GPS track recording, waypoint management, etc. It's a little quirky, but for a free app, it's damn useful. It's the only reason to have a mobile "device" (sorry, we're not allowed to consider them to be "computers")

    As for the OS, try your hand and building a custom version of Android on a phone that allows such a thing.

  8. Custom Android ROM by RickRussellTX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ubuntu Touch/Mobile failed, Microsoft is closing shop on Windows 10 Mobile.

    Honestly your best bet would be a phone that you can root, and put a stripped-down custom Android ROM on it. You don't need to connect to any Google Play services to get all the basics. At least that way you get to pick your configuration and keep it minimal.

    1. Re:Custom Android ROM by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu Touch/Mobile failed, Microsoft is closing shop on Windows 10 Mobile.

      Honestly your best bet would be a phone that you can root, and put a stripped-down custom Android ROM on it. You don't need to connect to any Google Play services to get all the basics. At least that way you get to pick your configuration and keep it minimal.

      There is LineageOS, it's a replacement (?) for cyanogenmod https://forum.xda-developers.c...

    2. Re:Custom Android ROM by tepples · · Score: 1

      now you have to diff it against a signed official source tree and review every line, while paying special attention to undefined behavior and "innocent" looking typos (think: underhanded C contest entries by the people I warned about in the first paragraph).

      Do you likewise do that for a PC operating system?

    3. Re:Custom Android ROM by gaiageek · · Score: 1

      Here Maps (formerly Nokia Here Maps). You can install an Android ROM, don't install gapps (the Google stuff), and install the Here Maps apk. Works fine. Plus it allows you to download maps for entire countries in advance so you use less data.

    4. Re:Custom Android ROM by nnull · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand how Ubuntu Mobile failed. It was an opensource project with a lot of interested developers and interest in the system. I quite enjoyed it. They just shut down the whole thing and told everyone to basically "fuck off". It's failure was the lack of production phones and seriously bad business decisions (Seriously, no one could buy the phone), not that it wasn't a good platform. This is what happens when you have a single entity control of a platform.

    5. Re:Custom Android ROM by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Custom ROMs are falling out of favor because phones are shipping with better versions of android. Touchwiz on gingerbread was garbage, so CM was really popular then. Since about KitKat there's been less and less incentive to load a custom ROM.

    6. Re:Custom Android ROM by wed128 · · Score: 1

      No, but Debian's GPG key is easy to verify.

    7. Re:Custom Android ROM by RickRussellTX · · Score: 1

      I wasn't advocating against the Google Play Store at all, simply pointing out that you don't need it to get a basic set of apps. You can find APK sources or mirrors to sideload many free apps.

  9. 99% good enough by supernova87a · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First, ask yourself why you really need to go to a phone that will be less supported, less well-debugged, less secure. Do you really need that special use case that rarely if ever comes up? Do you have the energy / time to maintain a phone like that to the same standards (and if not, are you just implicitly deciding not to)?

    Sometimes, don't you just want a phone that may not do absolutely everything, but otherwise generally just works? Aren't you old enough to not need to put up with half-assed shit any more?

    1. Re:99% good enough by olau · · Score: 2

      What are those standard you speak of?

      I can understand if you just don't want to think about it at all, but then... why are you here? Please hand in your geek card.

      Perhaps you can get a new card from the I've-seen-the-world crowd down the main stream.

  10. Absolutely ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    ... a book.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  11. Sailfish on Sony Xperia by chill · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sailfish by Jolla, on either the Sony Xperia or any of a number of other phones as aftermarket.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re: Sailfish on Sony Xperia by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I've wanted to try Sailfish just for the BTRFS support, but it's not supported on any phone that I actually want to use.

    2. Re:Sailfish on Sony Xperia by rolandw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've had a number of Jolla devices. My wife has a Jolla phone. If I were on the market today for a new phone, I'd be running Sailfish. The guys at Jolla are building genuine independence and, by being relatively obscure, I think manage to keep things secure yet flexible. Much of my work is in Linux admin and to be able to do that work, natively, straight off my phone is a joy.

      Word of warning: it's like Linux on the desktop - it works really well but you need to engage your brain. There is no easy way of syncing your music on your phone to some music library on some cloud service but hey, if you want to, you can find a way. Don't use a Jolla if you want a brain-dead experience or if you suffer regularly from hang-overs.

      Word of warning 2: When you meet someone else running Sailfish in the wild the amount of excitement generated probably needs a health warning - for you and those around you. If you have a heart problem, don't go looking for other Jolla fans outside a Jolla event.

    3. Re: Sailfish on Sony Xperia by zeigerpuppy · · Score: 2

      Yep, Sailfish is great, posting here from a Sailfish phone at the moment. It's much better than the malware that iOS amd Android have become. Otherwise I'd probably use LineageOS but very happy with Sailfish on Xperia X.

    4. Re:Sailfish on Sony Xperia by tipo159 · · Score: 1

      I so wanted Sailfish OS to work and ran it on a Nexus 5 for about six months before I threw in the towel. The problem is that sometimes I really NEED my phone to work and, in a couple of cases, the Nexus 5 adaptation of Sailfish OS let me down.

      Also, even though I got my money back, I don't trust Jolla after the Tablet crowdfunding disaster.

    5. Re: Sailfish on Sony Xperia by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

      Jolla tried BTRFS as main storage on their first phone, but they soon switched to ext3. Their experience was not too great. I think they still support BTRFS on the SD card, if that's your cup of tea. (OTOH, Wayland works great on it, the animations are smooth and you don't even notice it's there.)

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    6. Re: Sailfish on Sony Xperia by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 1

      The Intex Aqua Fish is another one which should be easy to obtain.

      --
      My first program:

      Hell Segmentation fault

    7. Re:Sailfish on Sony Xperia by GNious · · Score: 1

      I just replaced my old (original) Jolly with a 2017 Huawei P8 ... the Huawei feels slower, more sluggish, apps are prone to just hang or even freeze the phone for a few seconds.

      Really wish there were still 1st-party Jolla phones.

    8. Re: Sailfish on Sony Xperia by vm · · Score: 1

      It's not Dalvik -- that's old school & was replaced entirely by Android 5. The 50€ version of Sailfish X includes Android Run Time and it works great for everything that doesn't require Google Play services. I had to connect to their store via Psiphon (pretending to be in Germany) but payment was accepted and I have access to updates for a year. If you don't want to invest in the software, there are builds available that don't include the ART but don't expect a plethora of apps. Standby time is amazing, though, just as you'd notice on any of the Android open source builds that don't run Google Play services in the background.

  12. Cheap Windows phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Any cheapo windows phone will do all that just fine. The built-in map app is great for navigation, even without internet.

    1. Re:Cheap Windows phone by beuges · · Score: 2

      Not sure why you got a funny mod here. Windows Phone allows you to download maps for your region onto the device so you can navigate in areas with poor/no coverage.

  13. The E71 still does ALL that... by williamyf · · Score: 4, Informative

    Provided you load up The Garmin APP, and get the maps from OpenStreetMaps, and OperaMini

    More seriously though, the market has spoken, and there are only three platforms:
    iOS 18% Installed base.
    Google's Android with PlayStore/Services 55%
    AOSP (Android Open Source Ports) 27%

    the rest of the platforms (WindowsPhone10, BlackBerry's BB10, WebOS, Bada) are pretty much roundng errors.

    WP10 will be supported (including security patches) until 2020. BB10 will be "zombie supported" (no mention of security patches) until 2020 as well. The other two, I do not know.

    So, pick your poison wisely; for there is pretty much no escape.

    But, if you are hellbent on not being on neither iOS, nor any flavour of Android, then, for your specific use case, I'd bet either on Bada (Samsung has big pockets to keep the platform going for a while), or a "Smarther than a featurephone, but dumber thn a smartphone" asha-type phone from HMD (the owners of the Nokia brand).

    PS: My last four phones were a Nokia E71 like you (which I still keep around as my Garmin), then a Nokia N9, then a Blackberry Q10, then a Blackberry keyONE (android, current one), but I had a mobile phone in some capacity since 1996 (Motorola AMPS, then ericsson AMPS, then Sony AMPS, then nokia 6119, then nokia 7110, then Ericsson-Symbian-but-I-forget-cause-I-was-mugged, then Nokia 7250i, then some no-name huawei). So I kinda speak from experience.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    1. Re:The E71 still does ALL that... by rcs1000 · · Score: 2

      The Nokia N9 was a staggeringly good phone. I still wonder what would have happened if Nokia had thrown its weight behind it rather than behind the (at the time) pretty poor Windows Phone.

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    2. Re:The E71 still does ALL that... by iampiti · · Score: 1

      I do too. I'd had loved to see that platform develop. It could've been much better than what we have now

    3. Re:The E71 still does ALL that... by u801e · · Score: 1

      PS: My last four phones were a Nokia E71 like you (which I still keep around as my Garmin),

      I have a Nokia N95, N97, N8, N9, and a 808. Other than the N95, I used to be able to get free map updates roughly every 6 months for the Nokia/Here maps application. But since Nokia sold its maps division, there doesn't appear to be a way to update the maps on any of those phones. Are you keeping the maps on your E71 up to date? If so, then how?

    4. Re:The E71 still does ALL that... by u801e · · Score: 1

      The Nokia N9 was a staggeringly good phone. I still wonder what would have happened if Nokia had thrown its weight behind it rather than behind the (at the time) pretty poor Windows Phone.

      From what I've read, there appeared to be a lot of political issues between the Maemo/Meego and Symbian parts of Nokia which lead to the decision to go with Windows Phone. Like you, I wish that Nokia had gone with Meego and ported existing Symbian applications to the new platform.

      At least I still have and use my N9.

    5. Re:The E71 still does ALL that... by williamyf · · Score: 1

      I've got the GarminXT application from OVI store (when it existed, I guess you can get the sis files from non-sanct-sources), and get my maps from openstreetmap in Garmin format.

      As I detailed in the original post.

      Got the GarminXT app because the nokia maps app that shipped with the E71 did not had turn by turn directions.

      The Maps for the HereMaps App for the N9 (which I still have for the time being) have not been updated in a loooooong while... so even less hope for the E71

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    6. Re:The E71 still does ALL that... by williamyf · · Score: 1

      In my case, I went from E71 in 2009 to N9 in 2011 (a gift), so no time to buy and use the E72.

      My phones tend to last me four (or more) years.

      If it was significantly better, or just an incremental update, is hard to say.

      --
      *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
  14. I feel your pain... by used2win32 · · Score: 1

    Today, we either get the malware infested chaos of Android, or the closed garden of Apple. We used to have choices...

    Before I picked up my current phone, I looked at a (slightly used) Nokia 808 Pureview. I wanted decent sized screen, a phone, messaging, and a great camera with flash, and with the ability to get info from/to my computer. A decent browser would be nice to use in place of some apps (in the case of the 808). That was pretty much it.

    In the end, even the Carl Zeiss lens with a 41 megapixel camera could not get me to leave the current hardware.

    I might not have the perfect phone for me, but it works, can be fixed, is up to date for security and can get info to/from my computer. Just because the phone has additional functionality, doesn't mean I have to use it.

    --
    Procrastination; I'll think of a sig tomorrow.
    1. Re: I feel your pain... by used2win32 · · Score: 1

      What does this phone have to do with Microsoft?
      It is a Nokia phone. It runs the Symbian operating system. It was released in Feb 2012.

      Microsoft announced the purchase of Nokia in Sept 2013

      --
      Procrastination; I'll think of a sig tomorrow.
  15. Here's a comparison: by John.Banister · · Score: 4, Informative
  16. Betteridge by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

    ubports and Sailfish are probably your best bets if you want to flash a custom firmware to a small base of supported handsets.

  17. Nope. by Dracos · · Score: 1

    Windows Phone is dead (arguable whether it is a good alternative). Samsung was working on a clean-sheet mobile OS, but hasn't launched anything with it as far as I know.

    Mobile devices have become virtually indistinguishable from each other within the phone and tablet categories other than OS and screen size. I gave up on getting a new smartphone because nothing has a hardware keyboard anymore... everything is a super-thin slab of touchscreen-only monotony packed with inevitably over-spec'd hardware driving a new upgrade-go-round... no one needs 4K display or 25MP camera on these things.

  18. Purism, Librem 5 if you can wait a bit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm in the same boat as the OP, trying to milk a bit more life out of a phone that is pretty much falling apart (Galaxy S II). I want to get away from Android, and refuse to be a walled-gardener with Apple.

    Most promising lead I've found is Purism's Librem 5 phone, which is still a yearish out. Runs their flavor of Linux by default, but promises to be able to run pretty much any distro you want. Hardware kill switches for privacy concern things like webcam, WiFi, etc.

    I don't own any Purism stuff currently, but it seems like they are doing things right. I'm hoping that the phone doesn't end up vaporware, but it seems like that it unlikely; they've got a range of several Linux-focused laptops released.

    From there, I guess the question becomes what GPS navigation software options are available from Linux, since that was another primary listed requirement.

  19. Come on... by countach · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From what you're telling us, you have very modest requirements, albeit not quite modest enough to use a plain old candy bar phone.

    Now as a non-tech geek, which is what this profile is screaming, why would you not want to go mainstream? iOS and Android is mainstream. They are readily available. There are tons of resources on how to use them. They have apps available should the need arise. Going out of mainstream is for early adopters, for tech geeks, for people with non-mainstream needs. There's a reason why Android and iOS dominate. THEY WORK FOR MOST PEOPLE.

    1. Re:Come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just FYI, you can be a tech geek and still not be interested in installing tons of crap on a little shitty terminal.

  20. Phones for the 1% by gavron · · Score: 2

    You're a rare breed, using your smartphone primarily as a phone (!!!) and secondarily for other things.
    [quote]1. Phone calls (loads of conference calls, for which I use a wired headset with a microphone)
    2. SMS Messaging (unlimited on my plan)
    3. Navigation (very important, and is probably the most-used app on my phone)
    4. Occasional internet browsing[/quote]

    GIven you're not using Signal, #1 and #2 can be handled by any cheap handset.
    Navigation is a function of whose data you want to use. The most accurate data is provided by the companies that have spent the money to build the data and now want you in their ecosystem consuming it. That's Goole, Apple, and Microsoft. As an avid supporter of open source I would also bring up OpenStreetMap, but alas, it cannot compete with big money and complete datasets.
    Internet browsing can be done on cheap handsets as well.

    You say you work in the car with a wired headset. Use your car's nav system and get a cheap (aka Nokia) handset. It will remind you of how you used to do things back in the 1960s, and you won't be disappointed with all the modern features that scare you about IOS and Android.

    Ehud

  21. blackberry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    yeah yeah i know, laugh away. blackberry 10 is probably one of the best mobile OS i've come across. It's smooth, logical, and made for production. It all falls down on the app side. There are some, but not everything. You could probably get a leap for $100. Personally the passport while laughably shaped is a fantastic phone. If you truly use your phone for those 4 things (which is really what i also use it for) try a BB10 phone. I bet you'll be happy with it

    1. Re:blackberry by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      That's not a good recommendation since Blackberry doesn't make phones anymore. One can argue it was a viable OS, but if it had been among the best it wouldn't be fading in the rear view mirror of history like the Palm Pilot before it. There are options outside of iOS and Android in the budget "feature" phone group running Qualcomm's Brew OS, but that's about it.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    2. Re:blackberry by twosat · · Score: 1

      There's also the Nucleus RTOS from Mentor Graphics. Here in New Zealand, it's available in feature phones such as the Mobiwire Dakota, Doro 6520 and the ZTE R350. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      https://www.mentor.com/embedde...

  22. Buy the tech not into the brand by AHuxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. Phone calls (loads of conference calls, for which I use a wired headset with a microphone)
    2. SMS Messaging (unlimited on my plan)
    Something like a better Nokia 3310 that can support calls, tethering.
    3. Navigation (very important, and is probably the most-used app on my phone)
    A portable GPS unit with free new map support.
    4. Occasional internet browsing
    A quality laptop using any OS you like.
    No android or apple OS needed.

    Buy real devices that support what is needed as part of their design.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Buy the tech not into the brand by tepples · · Score: 1

      4. Occasional internet browsing
      A quality laptop using any OS you like.

      That'd be fine if companies still made 10.1" laptops designed to run desktop operating systems. That size ended production in December 2012, and bulkier laptops need a bigger, more visible bag.

    2. Re: Buy the tech not into the brand by houghi · · Score: 1

      If I would do that I would walk around with 3 devices all the time. Not practicle for me. The strange thing is that there are only two choices. There should be more. Duopoly is not a good thing.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  23. Trust is gone by sgage · · Score: 1

    The internet is a cesspool, the big tech corps are vampires, and no, there is no anything that you can trust. The internet is over. Net neutrality is over. Sorry, but there it is.

    1. Re:Trust is gone by doom · · Score: 1

      The internet is a cesspool,

      What's under discussion isn't "the internet", but rather a particular type of client. One can use the internet without using a mobile device.

      Which is not to make the claim that the internet is not a cesspool, but just staying away from mobile phones will help you dodge some of the turds.

      If you're first thought is "Oh my god, how will I upload photos of my lunch to facenorth?" you have bigger problems than the state of the internet.

    2. Re:Trust is gone by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      The internet is a cesspool

      I don't agree. Internet is not a cesspool, yet ; but it dangerously moves in that direction.

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  24. Re:Facebook? Whatsapp? Snapchat? Games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can't speak for the op, but I (along with many others), use my phone as a phone, and occasionally as a GPS. I don't want social networking anywhere near my phone, really don't like instant/SMS messaging, and games are pretty worthless to me.

    If the only device I have available to me is my phone, it is because I'm busy, and really don't want the distraction of those other things.

    I have a REAL computer that does all those other things far better than the fanciest smart phone can.

  25. Re:But... iOS and Android *are* half-assed. by yithar7153 · · Score: 1

    I've never been that impressed with the experience provided by these multibillion dollar corporations.

    Despite all is their resources, they mostly deliver lipstick on a pig. With a custom ROM, at least it's mostly MY pig.

    I'm not sure if you're aware of the whole fiasco with the Intel ME, but there are concerns about smartphones for pretty much the same reason. Like there have been bugs found in the ME. So there may be bugs in the phone's firmware as well.
    https://ssd.eff.org/en/module/...

  26. There are some, one is kinda viable (sort of) by pngwen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Probably the most viable phone OS is Legacy OS, which is just an open source version of Android. You can install it, and provided you don't instal gapps, it is pretty secure. It also gives you complete control over your phone. Legacy OS + Fdroid gives you a FOSS solution that protects your privacy about as well as any OS for a tracking device can.

    There is also the openmoko stack from a few years ago. If you can get your hands on a Neo FreeRunner, they are an acceptable phone. You'll be on your own for software though, as that project is effectively dead.

    No matter what you do, you can't really trust a phone completely. The nature of the cell network means that any cellphone is a defacto tracking device. Your whereabouts are logged, and because you have shared them with a third party you have no expectation of privacy. They don't even require a warrant for law enforcement. Also, private citizens can simply purchase the location data from most providers. So keep that in mind. I carry a phone, but I am ready to stick it in a microwave and run from it at a moment's notice.

    --
    I am the penguin that codes in the night.
    1. Re: There are some, one is kinda viable (sort of) by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Probably the most viable phone OS is Legacy OS

      Legacy OS is a lightweight linux distro for very old computers. I think you mean LineageOS.

      which is just an open source version of Android.

      Android is also an open source version of android.

    2. Re:There are some, one is kinda viable (sort of) by doom · · Score: 1

      The nature of the cell network means that any cellphone is a defacto tracking device. Your whereabouts are logged, and because you have shared them with a third party you have no expectation of privacy. They don't even require a warrant for law enforcement. Also, private citizens can simply purchase the location data from most providers.

      See, they call it a "smart phone", because it's the phone that's smart.

    3. Re: There are some, one is kinda viable (sort of) by pngwen · · Score: 1

      LINEAGE OS! I keep doing that! Legacy OS has been in brain longer. Lineage is the successor of Cyanogenmod. It is a completely Open Source build of android, and by default does not come with GAPPS.

      --
      I am the penguin that codes in the night.
    4. Re:There are some, one is kinda viable (sort of) by pngwen · · Score: 1

      Doesn't even have to be a smart phone. If you are wandering around with a StarTac folder in your pocket you still log in to cell towers as you go about your business.

      --
      I am the penguin that codes in the night.
    5. Re: There are some, one is kinda viable (sort of) by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I use lineage myself.

      I used to run all kinds of AOSP based ROMs (and yes, AOSP is also open source) but I found Lineage to be the most reliable overall.

  27. Purism - linux phone in development by RedCard · · Score: 1

    Librem 5 from purism is a linux phone in development. [1]

    Sure, it's not shipping for another year, but the company has shipped plenty of (well-regarded) linux laptops, and even gone so far as to figure out how to shut off intel's AMT in their newer machines. [2]

    [1] https://puri.sm/shop/librem-5/
    [2] https://puri.sm/learn/avoiding...

    1. Re:Purism - linux phone in development by jaminJay · · Score: 1

      Hardware switches for turning things like GPS and WiFi off, too!

      --
      Leela: "Is all the work done by children?" Alien: "No, not the whipping."
  28. Down to 2 options now, unfortunately. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I really wished Microsoft would have pursued a phone that ran full, native Windows10. Unfortunately you're really confined to Android with it's daily vulnerabilities and stability issues or IOS with locked down handcuffs and proprietary formats.

  29. If you really use for calls, get iOS/Android by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    1) iOS/Android both have roboblockers. If you really value calls so much don't you want to avoid false ones?

    1) If you do conference calls a lot, you WILL want the full range of possible conferencing apps - I have to do audio calls along with three (sometimes four) different types of video conference through a week.

    1) Just get a real phone.

    I left all the numbers the same as they all relate to calling.

    2) Why not also be able to use any other messaging option that may become popular, like WhatsApp?

    2) Get a real phone.

    3) Why would you not want a ridiculous array of navigation apps, many with offline support?

    3) Maybe you want different types of navigation, like hiking or biking support?

    3) Again I point you to real phones for incredible versatility for all the things you say you want to do.

    4) What happens when the only browser on your non-standard device is not working well on some particular site? Or maybe you want password management or autofill or some other feature?

    4) You know what goes here.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. Alternative to Android/iOS by StormReaver · · Score: 2

    Not yet, but there will be in 2019.

    The Librem phone hits all of my requirements, and will be my next phone in 2019. It's not cheap, but its feature set is awesome. Some highlights (in no particular order):

    1) Runs pure Linux, which allows for installing many standard Linux distributions.
    2) Has hardware kill switches for the radio and microphone.
    3) Encrypted calls between Librem phones.
    4) No tracking.

    There are other great features, too. It's the phone I've been waiting for since I first discovered smartphones.

  31. Windows Phone by DogDude · · Score: 2

    Windows Phone 10 works great. I got one of the $200 Alcatel somethings from a Microsoft Store and it's really awesome. Great UI. I like that you can use it without a Windows ID at all. Mail is much better than the other two. Calendaring is good. Maps and GPS aren't bad, but I don't use them much. It has all of the basic "apps" you might need (Lyft and Uber for me).

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
  32. Nope. by XSportSeeker · · Score: 2

    If you are looking for something modern, with latest specs, short answer - nope.

    If it can be an older device, for known chinese manufacturers (because all phones are manufactured in China to a degree), your only bet is probably a Windows Phone... which has been discontinued and is currently in a limbo.

    Other than that, Ubuntu Touch is dead, there are some few privacy minded mobile distros still out there, but most options will require you to: install the OS yourself, pre-order something that is still not out, have a hard time actually buying a phone, and/or perhaps trust a company that will probably be making their phone with an unknown chinese manufacturer anyways.
    It's also worth noting that lots of companies tried to come up with either a hardened Android version for privacy, or a Linux distro that would run on a mobile device. It didn't work out too well, either because of technical limitations and speed smartphones are evolving, or for lack of costumers and support.
    I wouldn't recommend going for any small company alternatives right now because long term support is definitely not guaranteed.

    Since you have so little requirements, might as well delegate navigation and browsing to another device, and just buy a dumbphone.

  33. Sacrilege! Also an excellent question! by shanen · · Score: 1

    In particular, I find your explicit description of your needs and implicit philosophy are highly simpatico. Alas, I think the answer is no, for religious reasons, as just proven by the tax "reform" legislation we [Americans] are in the process of receiving.

    In a capitalist economy, there would be a number of competing options and we would have meaningful choice and freedom. The side effect of that competition might even drive meaningful improvements rather than the current insane defense of profit maximization. However, that should give you some hint as to what's wrong.

    We don't have capitalism, which is even deader than communism. What we have now is corporate cancerism.

    There is no gawd but Profit, and Apple is Profit's #1 prophet. Rounding out the top ten (according to Forbes for 2016) we have Gilead, the google, Exxon, and some huge gamblers. The gamblers are various kinds of too-big-to-fail financial institutions that gamble with OUR [the peasants'] money, pocketing the profits while relying on their captive governments to save them when they phuck up again. (Yeah, the Russians have it even worse.)

    As it applies to your concrete question, you should count yourself lucky you still have too choices to "freely" pick from. One of these two cancers [Apple or the google] will ultimately swallow the other. My prediction is that Apple is more likely to make a fatal mistake, or perhaps just slump for a product or three and go down that way.

    Or to reword it in long tweet form:

    Trains on time? NO!
    Planes on time? NO!
    Make Rome great again? NO!

    But #PresidentTweety got lots of "help" from #BolshevikRepublicans!
    So they gave themselves a YUGE raise paid from the national DEBT!
    There is no gawd but profit and Trump is NO prophet.

    #TrumpStinks #PutinWins

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:Sacrilege! Also an excellent question! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      In a capitalist economy, there would be a number of competing options

      That depends on a lot of things, such as barriers to entry and network effects among others. If you want a guarantee of a number of competing options, you'd have to go to some sort of planned economy that would pick a certain number of winners.

      In particular, there's network effects. Network effects are when the value of an X depends on how many other people have Xs. It's what makes it really difficult for Linux to take over from Windows. People run Windows partly because it runs the software you want. People write software for Windows because there's lots of people who will buy it. Network effects apply to phones, also. Android has the most users, and iOS has the wealthier users, so it's worth writing apps for both of them. Windows Phone, for all the good things I heard about it, never got popular enough to attract all the apps, and it stayed less popular because it didn't have all the apps.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    2. Re:Sacrilege! Also an excellent question! by shanen · · Score: 1

      I think in the cases of natural monopolies, you should also have special tax rates. The main goal would be to make sure the government has sufficient money to regulate the monopoly properly and prevent price gouging. However I think there should be a secondary goal of supporting research to break the monopoly with alternative technologies or approaches that will support honest competition. In certain cases, there might be some justification for higher taxes for other purposes, or perhaps it would get more complicated than that. I think sales or consumption taxes are fundamentally wrongheaded because government should be encouraging the sales and consumption that drive the economy, but there are real infrastructure costs that need to be distributed fairly.

      Network effects sometimes do lead to natural monopolies. However in many cases they are not really natural monopolies, but are used to create abnormal profits that allow monopoly-based destruction of the alternatives. I would use the delayed adoption of FM radio as an example.

      Your Microsoft example is actually one that led me in this direction. Imagine if Microsoft had been divided into two or four competing companies. Each child company would have started with a copy of the source code and a roughly equal share of the human and physical resources. After that they would have competed freely using Windows as a standard technology. They would even be allowed to extend the standard by sharing the new extensions in public, but perhaps some of the children would decide to go their own way. I strongly believe the overall result would have been faster overall evolution of the OS situation and higher total profits. Perhaps Microsoft Child A would make bad choices and go down, but Children B and C would probably do better, and the overall result would have been REAL OS options (and more freedom) for everyone...

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  34. Tizen OS by coolate · · Score: 1

    Cheap phones, modern browser, simple interface, and low hardware requirements so itâ(TM)s fast. Ok store, ok security update pace and support and mostly open source. Itâ(TM)s the hyundai of phones. Mediocre but likable!

  35. Re:Ubuntu Phone? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    Canonical Touch is dead but the project lives on, by volunteers, at ubports.com

  36. Which is more important? by green1 · · Score: 1

    a) being able to tell everyone who doesn't care that you're sticking it to the corporations by not having an Android or iOS device
    b) having the best tool for the job.

    You can do everything you ask on other devices sure, but it won't be as good.
    Specifically mapping and navigation which you list as your most important requirement, you simply can not beat google maps for that, and you won't get that on some random non-android and non-ios device. Sure there are various other mapping options, but for most up to date, most accurate, and including real time traffic, accident reporting, road closures, etc? Not likely if you don't have Android or iOS.

    Beyond that though, invariably you'll have to explain to someone at some point why you can't just do some simple thing that everyone else can do because your device doesn't support the app needed for it. Sure you'll think you're cool while saying it, but everyone around you will be rolling their eyes.

    Phones these days are all about the apps, and if it's not Android, and it's not iOS, it simply doesn't have the app support. This is what makes building a new smartphone OS so difficult, your platform can be better in every single way, but it will never take off unless you can sway millions of individual app developers and convince them to develop for your platform, something they have no reason to do as you don't have any market share until after you've got the app developers.

    1. Re:Which is more important? by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Beyond that though, invariably you'll have to explain to someone at some point why you can't just do some simple thing that everyone else can do because your device doesn't support the app needed for it.

      So what? Is your self-esteem based on the corporate brand of phone you choose to purchase?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:Which is more important? by green1 · · Score: 1

      I think you're reversing the roles here. My self-esteem is NOT based on the brand of phone, so I don't have to go around explaining to everyone why I chose a non-Android non-iOS device, and can instead just get on with doing whatever task it is that I'm trying to do, knowing that whatever app I need will exist for my platform.

      The OP on the other hand seems to be more invested in the brand of the phone "It's NOT an Android!" or "It's NOT an iPhone" rather than just picking the tool that will best do the job needing to be done.

    3. Re:Which is more important? by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

      a) Beyond that though, invariably you'll have to explain to someone at some point why you can't just do some simple thing that everyone else can do because your device doesn't support the app needed for it.

      Yup

      A year ago I was asking myself almost the same question as the OP, and I came to the conclusion that what I needed was a good "dumb phone", augmented by a tablet when traveling. It took me hours of research on the internet to find the dumb phone. I eventually brought it, and found that it didn't do the basics of phone and SMS nearly as well as my Android smart phone. The two bug-bears were: firstly, contacts, where I had to manually enter and maintain my contact list which had been maintained in the Cloud by Android and synchronized with my desktop, and, secondly, typing SMSs. It was a bit of "fun" using the old keypad again, but basically a pain. I was slowly typing brief, misspelled responses to long messages.

      Despite my limited stated requirements, I found that I needed/wanted more, practically. I did want to be able to access the internet when out, and to be able to take photos at short notice. Sure, my dumb phone did have some kind of worthless browser, and could take photos, but obviously there was no comparison with a modern, moderately specced smartphone, let alone a top end one. I also found that keeping track of a phone and a tablet during normal work and leisure was just too complicated.

      The dumbphone experiment was a waste of my time in 2016/17, and will be increasingly so as time goes by

      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
    4. Re:Which is more important? by Javaman59 · · Score: 1

      Agree the dumbphone is the neatest solution if it really does the job. They are smaller and simpler - battery life is a big plus! However, I found that if I regularly need a smartphone/tablet as well, then it's just a matter of time before I lose one of them. The "must carry" list becomes: wallet, keys, phone, smartphone (maybe passport). One too many for me. A bit of a pity, however. :)

      Thanks for the tips about the SIM USB reader and other spec details. (Although, I found during my dumbphone experiment that I was noticing things like this, which all just "worked" on a modern smartphone).

      --
      I'm a software visionary. I don't code.
  37. How could I have forgotten about Microsoft? by shanen · · Score: 1

    Good comment, though I think you deserve funny mods for your closing joke more than insightful for stating the obvious. To really show insight, you needed to say more about why Microsoft can't do small.

    My theory is that the fundamental problem is that Microsoft had their head wrapped around the BIG OS model, and never recovered. Small is not their thing, but for phones smaller is just better and the ridiculously over-capable OS was a bad thought pattern.

    However, in accord with my other comment, I would also argue that corporate cancerism tends to do that. We actually had other players in the smartphone market, with other choices to freely choose from. I think Nokia was an especially sad story, but there were others. The only way the two current cancers (Apple and the google) can avoid swallowing each other is if they can keep their predatory financial models separate--but it's obvious that they are converging.

    Ultimately there will be one smartphone to rule them all. Our only choice will be the winner or nothing. Not a real choice. (However, we may not get that if they figure out how to bribe the politicians to require each person to have THE smartphone.)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    1. Re:How could I have forgotten about Microsoft? by doom · · Score: 2

      Our only choice will be the winner or nothing. Not a real choice

      I went with "nothing" a long time ago. My life is okay. Really.

    2. Re:How could I have forgotten about Microsoft? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Modern phone operating systems aren't really small either. Windows 2000 ran happily on computers far less powerful than my phone (and with a lot less storage space) - and my phone was very cheap 4 years ago.

      The odd thing with Windows Phone was that they underestimated the value of the ecosystem. My partner had a Nokia 1020, which had a nice UI and a great camera. She'd have kept using it if not for the fact that it didn't support newer versions of TLS and so increasingly couldn't connect to online services (for example, it couldn't connect to my mail server, because I disabled all vulnerable protocol versions and it didn't give a useful error message so it took ages to figure out that this was the reason).

      For all of the time that she owned it, there were basically no useful third-party apps. Actually, there was a musicpd client (unlike iOS), but that's about it. Now she has an Android phone, which she generally likes less, but when she needs an app for something it probably exists (and most of the time it even exists in F-Droid).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:How could I have forgotten about Microsoft? by shanen · · Score: 1

      Too bad your late response is unlikely to receive any of the insightful mods it might deserve. I mostly agree with you, but I do want to clarify the large-OS thing.

      You are responding in absolute terms, and you are correct on that basis, but Microsoft was thinking in relative terms. They deliberately crafted their OSes BEYOND the economically reasonable hardware available at the time they were creating them. They were counting on Moore's Law to make the hardware resources (as required by the newest version of Windows) widely available by the time they entered the market. As a competitive strategy when the OS market was more competitive, it worked pretty well because it allowed them to deliver the most functionality relative to competing OSes.

      Not relevant now, and even less relevant in the smartphone market. As the author of the original question put it, the capabilities of the phones are already quite excessive. I also believe the power problem has kept an absolute lid on smartphones and effectively overcome Moore's Law, even though the chips continue to improve.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  38. Two (lame) choices by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

    1. Build your own. Check out RePhone from seeed. https://www.seeedstudio.com/Re...
    2. Use a portable WiFi hotspot with Google Voice and an iPod Touch. I have a data plan with a Straight Talk device and use Google Voice for texts. I don't get many calls, and that's the way, uh huh uh huh, I like it.

  39. ubuntu touch? by MarkeJohnston · · Score: 1

    What is Ubuntu Touch? Ubuntu Touch is in general a new Ubuntu distribution with a different UI that is adapted specifically to mobile devices with a touchscreen like phones and tablets. Modern mobile devices are already very powerful and therefore Linux which exists for nearly all modern hardware architectures and can easily run on these devices. However, an existing user interface was not yet available to run Linux on these devices. Ubuntu Touch will be able to fill this gap. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/...

  40. Moto Android phones by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Removable battery.
    Removable SD card.
    Easily bootloader-unlocked.

    The G4 Play and G5 rock socks, and are some of the best phones for the price -- $100-200 -- out there.

  41. LineageOS by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Would love to see a Linux phone running normal Linux + Wayland rather than Android yet without all the Google spyware (Google Play Services) Android by itself is really not that bad. It is for the most part just Linux. You can cross compile whatever you want without much trouble.

    Currently best bet is to find a phone supported by Lineage OS (formerly Cyanogenmod) where you don't have to go through hoops to crack locked boot loaders and extraneous BS. Google play is not included by default with Lineage OS and you get to have "root" if you want.

    There are completely offline mapping solutions with voice directions, reroute and fancy map views that don't require any Internet connection at all. ALK offers a fairly decent solution for not much $$$ and it can be legitimately side loaded easily without Google play.

  42. SailfishOS is still around, but it has problems by shm · · Score: 1

    Jolla no longer sells hardware, so you will have to acquire a Sony Xperia X1, and install SailfishOS yourself.

    The OS itself still has some problems. For some strange reason, you can not bulk delete entries from the phone log. You can not block callers. These are old feature requests which the Sailfish team has ignored for years.

    GPS is supported, but you can only use HERE maps via the optional (free) Android adaption layer, and occasionally that breaks. There is no viable native mapping solution.

    If you're into messaging via Whatsapp and Signal, support is broken. There was a whatsapp clone for Sailfish some years ago, but it was remotely disabled by Facebook.

    Signal support is present but for text messaging only.

    It's usable if you have the patience and time to workaround these problems.

  43. Re:What I'd Like To See by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    I'll second this. I know I'm an extreme edge case but I want a 'dumb' OpenBSD brick phone.

    Dumb phone by day. OpenBSD LTE router by tether.

  44. Re:Ubuntu Phone? by nnull · · Score: 1

    Wow, thanks for that. I was disappointed when Ubuntu killed the project, I'm glad the volunteers have continued it. It's not a bad platform and it could be built to be a great alternative platform.

  45. Re:Librem? by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

    I'm going to make the bold prediction that this phone will never see the light of day. The weekly updates while fund raising followed by radio silence in the almost 2 months since the funding goal was met is about as clear a sign as exists that this was either poorly scoped out -or- is a total sham. Plenty of examples of this pattern exist and I don't know of a single one that actually ended up actually shipping.

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  46. Allow for choice by Linnerd · · Score: 1

    I tackle the problem by making it a two step process:
    1) Look for some phone hardware that is as open, flexible and as standard possible.
          Note that this immediately excludes Apple HW - no openness, no choices there.
    2) Select the OS that best satisfies your needs on that hardware.

    For (1) I've chosen a Fairphone 2 (5", Qualcomm Snapdragon, 2GB + 32 GB, 2 SIMs + MicroSD, USB-OTG, Headphone Jack, replacable battery), 10/10 on ifixit, built to last.
    For (2) you have the choice between Android/OASP 6.1 maintained by the company, regular updates; community supported Ubuntu and Sailfish ports; Lineage 14.1 (aka OASP 7.1) with incremental updates (that's what I'm currently using, but I've test-driven/used them all).

    Not cutting hardware & software, but well usable & I expect to get at least another 2-3 years of usage out of this combo.

  47. Stupid Answer by pikester · · Score: 1

    Find a phone that has battery requirements you like and run VPN software on it. Doesn't solve the security requirement though.

  48. Sailfish OS by recrudescence · · Score: 1

    I'm using Sailfish OS on a Jolla phone now, and I'm very happy with it. Partly because the switch from Android is made smooth by supporting Android apps. It has all the requirements OP asked for, including a navigation solution (which can optionally fall back on online Google Maps data). Having said that, I do have a love / hate relationship with the company in charge though. They've consistently disregarded their fanbase while writing glamorous "We've listened" posts for every release, and they seem to be making terrible business decisions lately.

  49. No white box phone. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    The problem is there isn’t any white box phones. Like the white box PC where there are a bunch of standardized components that we can put together. To make our own custom phones.
    If we had this, I expect we would have a couple Linux ports and a Net BSD port by now.
    Heck Microsoft may get back in the mobile market again.
    However at the moment the build tolerance of these phones are very difficult for the small business or the individual to make and sell a practical phone that they can say is theirs.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  50. Purism Librem 5 by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Get one of those. Their setup does look like the prime choose a choice for someone who wants to avoid the big two.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  51. lineage + fdroid by sad_ · · Score: 1

    buy a phone that is supported by lineageOS and install it.
    do not install the google apps, everything you need is already provided out of the box without any google interference.
    install fdroid to get additional, all open source, android apps. it has navigation apps available.

    you'll have a phone that is as much open source as possible, the only thing that remains are binairy kernel blobs for various hardware bits of your phone.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  52. I do not agree. by emil · · Score: 2

    LineageOS provides an optional root package. If you apply it, and you also apply a GAPPS package, Google's Skynet/(Safetynet) will mark you forever tainted and forbid you from using Android Pay or Netflix. I don't care about either of these features, so that's what I'm doing for now.

    Option B: You can also skip GAPPS and run without Google. If you load F-Droid, you can use the Yalp app to pull non-GMS (Google Mobile Services) based apps out of Google Play for use on a non-Google version of LineageOS.

    LineageOS updates will successfully apply either way.

    I am carefully considering Option B for my upgrade to Oreo.

  53. Copperhead - Hardened Android by emil · · Score: 1

    Newer than the Blackphone is the Copperhead hardened Android.

    There is a free download for the Nexus 5x and 6p (but these phones have a terrible habit of frying their CPUs).

    They also sell Pixels preloaded with Copperhead, but these are quite expensive.

    1. Re:Copperhead - Hardened Android by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Interesting, thanks. Alas, it looks like those only support North American radio at the moment, and in any case their preconfigured devices are both out of stock, but that's definitely another source I'll keep an eye on.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  54. Re:What I'd Like To See by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    This has to change. There has to be a better paradigm.

    Dead wrong.

    When 99% of the market wants either Android or iOS, there is no economically viable alternative. Users are financially locked into each platforms by their respective app stores, so a new competitor is extremely unlikely. Privacy-minded, user-centric operating systems on phones will remain niche for the forseeable future.

    As things stand, you can install Lineage on almost anything that ships with Android. That's about as good as it's going to get.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  55. I have one by spikeysnack · · Score: 1

    I have a FireFox OS phone. I unfortunately can only use ATT sim because the US Cellular is incompatible. but the wifi is great and the integrated Firefox browser is very good (HTML 5.0) , and the screen is small but clear. The user experience is better than android, but it is older and the camera is not up to 2017 standards. There is a whole app store world of stuff that is not related to Google, because the phone was not rolled out in USA but in Europe and Asia markets. You can find them around on ebay and other after-market sites. OS updates are slow to non-existent. I pay like $25/month for prepaid, because I have a landline at home and get less than a call a day.

  56. Chipset drivers by tepples · · Score: 1

    the same binary works for everybody's PC.

    Not necessarily. Different GPUs, sound cards, NICs, etc. need different drivers. In order to work on everybody's PC, an operating system has to bundle drivers for every chipset ever produced.

  57. Linux on T101HA by tepples · · Score: 1

    A quality laptop using any OS you like.

    That'd be fine if companies still made 10.1" laptops designed to run desktop operating systems.

    I have an Asus Transformer T100 that I bought well after December 2012.

    As of the latest update to the Debian project's compatibility page for the T100TA, suspend and Bluetooth are "Error (Couldn't get it working)", screen backlight is "Unsupported(No Driver)", and WLAN and audio are "Only works with a non-free driver and or firmware".

    Or does "any OS you like" mean "any OS you like so long as it is Windows" in the same way that the Ford Model T came in "any color that he wants so long as it is black"? Does "systems" refer to both Windows 8.1 and Windows 10?

    Here's one you can buy for $300. [ASUS Transformer Book T101HA-C4-GR]

    Is Linux more compatible with the T101HA than with the T100TA? In this forum post, a user complains about "missing sound."

  58. Finish this phrase: "all I need is" by whit3 · · Score: 1

    ...16k RAM 10MB hard disk 640k RAM for this computer to type a letter an e-mail terminal and so on. Trying to find a phone that's specialized to only a few functions is fruitless; the addition of apps to a smart device (or even the addition of smarts) is not an economic drain, so don't THINK about it so much. Think, rather, of whether those apps are useful, and ignore the ones that aren't. And, if the phone is open to new apps, it does't become a paperweight in three months when the next 'need' pops up from nowhere.

  59. Carry 2 phones? by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    The E55 was the best phone I've ever had. Maps, Gmail... that was the main things I actually needed... and it did it all in a lot less space than any one now.

    How does carrying 2 phones into the mix effect decisions?

    - one rooted / free / whatever
    - the other locked down. Might as well choose Apple

    Some advantages of this:
    - might not need to carry a battery pack
    - no need for a dual sim phone if that's useful to you
    - one for the wife and another for