Slashdot Mirror


High-Paying Trade Jobs Sit Empty, While High School Grads Line Up For University (npr.org)

An anonymous reader shares an NPR report: While a shortage of workers is pushing wages higher in the skilled trades, the financial return from a bachelor's degree is softening, even as the price -- and the average debt into which it plunges students -- keeps going up. But high school graduates have been so effectively encouraged to get a bachelor's that high-paid jobs requiring shorter and less expensive training are going unfilled. This affects those students and also poses a real threat to the economy. "Parents want success for their kids," said Mike Clifton, who teaches machining at the Lake Washington Institute of Technology, about 20 miles from Seattle. "They get stuck on [four-year bachelor's degrees], and they're not seeing the shortage there is in tradespeople until they hire a plumber and have to write a check."

In a new report, the Washington State Auditor found that good jobs in the skilled trades are going begging because students are being almost universally steered to bachelor's degrees. Among other things, the Washington auditor recommended that career guidance -- including choices that require less than four years in college -- start as early as the seventh grade. "There is an emphasis on the four-year university track" in high schools, said Chris Cortines, who co-authored the report. Yet, nationwide, three out of 10 high school grads who go to four-year public universities haven't earned degrees within six years, according to the National Student Clearinghouse. At four-year private colleges, that number is more than 1 in 5.

355 of 578 comments (clear)

  1. He got it right by blogagog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess Mike Rowe was right all along!

    1. Re:He got it right by slew · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In case people haven't seen this yet...

      https://www.prageru.com/videos...

    2. Re:He got it right by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? In my Software Dev career, it took me 20 years to make $50/hr, and right now I'm at $45/hr in a bridging contract waiting to go to $70/hr in a couple of weeks.

      Contrast that with a $100 electrician who actually gets to move away from the desk once in a while, and there is no contest.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:He got it right by ezelkow1 · · Score: 1

      All depends on where you live. It took me ~9 years to hit that point, but Im willing to bet if you head to SV you could do that in 3 or less. Of course a much much larger percentage of that money then goes to rent and everything else living in that area, so really you could be having a lot lower standard of living while earning a lot more. If you are in a non-tech oriented part of the USA then 20 years could be normal

    4. Re:He got it right by sexconker · · Score: 1

      $50 an hour like most Software Devs make 3 years out of school.

      LOL! What's the weather like in the mid 90s?

    5. Re:He got it right by slew · · Score: 2

      Was he? I love how the article says "High-Paying" but does not give you a fucking number. Is $27.54 high paying? or is it $50 an hour like most Software Devs make 3 years out of school.

      Although Software Devs can make $50/hour 3 years out of school, this advice is targeted at the Joe-average and Mary-mediocre folks that borrow money to get a degree. Then 4-5 years later they maybe finish their degree (or not), some Joe-averages find that they can't find a decent job in their field of study and end up working at Starbucks.

      The flaw in their logic was simply getting a degree would guarantee a "high-paying" job. The question they *should* have been asking is what good would that degree be *specifically* for them. The "theoretical" question if borrowing money to get a degree was a good idea for some other Sara-smarty person who might have been destined for a $100/hour regardless of whether-or-not she got a degree is not an interesting data point for them.

      The cautionary tale involves say Mary-mediocre actually got some Dev job, and maybe she is a bit below the average Dev (unlike Lake Wobegon's Devs who are all above average) . There is also the question of what happens after 10 years of Mary-mediocre working for Sara-smarty, Mary-mediocre's low-end Software Dev's job was offshored and/or she had to train Johnny-junior before she got layed off. Now she needs to find a job at Starbucks to pay the bills working for Joe-average the store's assistant manager (who is still paying off his school loans)...

      A career is (hopefully) longer than 10 years, remember, if you graduate university at 22, you are only 32 after 10 years... Although 32 might seem young enough to start in another career, it's really painful...

      Although university can be a great choice for education, it's really only valuable if you can make use of it (especially if you have to borrow money), so it's prudent to take stock in your own situation and not blindly follow the crowd (or your parents) and examine your own options and make choices that maximizes your personal chance for long term success, not short term bragging rights...

    6. Re:He got it right by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

      I would never hire anyone anywhere for a job requiring analytical skills who would live in a rental.

      Live with mom and dad or with 5 room mates crammed like sardines while putting away a legitimate down payment for an affordable flat.

      Pay that for 2-5 years and hope the market rate goes up... as it usually does, though with the occasional catastrophic hiccough.

      Move into something more comfortable once you're further along.

      I would never under any circumstances hire anyone who is going to bitch about the cost of rent and how they can't get ahead in one of the highest paying places on earth when they're simply throwing away their money.

      I was making $50 an hour after 4 years without any degree in Oslo, Norway. Cost of living is peanuts compared to the valley. Flats and semi-detached are pretty reasonable here. Ranging between $250,000 and $1.5 million... the desirable stuff lingering around $800k. You could of course get a big expensive house, but there's no real value in that. The country is liberal... not SV liberal nutjob liberal... but liberal in the sense that a good quality of life for everyone is a good quality of life for everyone.

      Of course, SV is really exciting if you want someone to define you for yourself. SV hasn't ever been famous for personal mental health. The personality adaptation it requires for you to survive in the valley is horrifying to outsiders. I'm heading to Seattle in a week and I'm actually frightened because I'm worried it will be like SV on steroids. Like "We're nothing like the valley... we're so much better". I never liked the toxic overly judgmental environment of the north west.

    7. Re:He got it right by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      $50 an hour like most Software Devs make 3 years out of school.

      LOL! What's the weather like in the mid 90s?

      mid 90s? It's about $90k a year, which is fairly close to the current median.

    8. Re: He got it right by reanjr · · Score: 1

      You're a moron if you think home ownership is always financially responsible. In many of the most expensive places in the country, your money is much better spent investing in stocks or even bonds than it is paying the ownership premium.

    9. Re:He got it right by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley.....well, I'm in the Silicon Forest, somewhat north, but yes, my housing is much more reasonable, as is my food and gas.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    10. Re:He got it right by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Of course, in Oslo, Norway, you were paying rather large income taxes on that....

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    11. Re: He got it right by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      You're a moron if you think home ownership is always financially responsible. In many of the most expensive places in the country, your money is much better spent investing in stocks or even bonds than it is paying the ownership premium.

      I wonder if that dude was alive in 2007? Sounds like he swallowed the Homowners are superior argument that has been pounded into people just like the A liberal arts degree is superior to any trade argument as well.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:He got it right by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley.....well, I'm in the Silicon Forest, somewhat north, but yes, my housing is much more reasonable, as is my food and gas.

      Good - I hate it when I can't reason with my food or gas. 8^P Sorry, I'm in Robin Williams mode today.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re:He got it right by sexconker · · Score: 1

      $50 an hour like most Software Devs make 3 years out of school.

      LOL! What's the weather like in the mid 90s?

      mid 90s? It's about $90k a year, which is fairly close to the current median.

      $50 per hour is over $100,000. Please show data supporting the claim that "most software devs" are making over $100,000 annually "3 years out of school".

      A quick check shows a median based on 2016 data of $49.17 per hour. For all software developers. 3 years out of school you'll still be considered a "junior developer" and you'll be stuck taking bitch projects. If you want to climb the ladder you'll be stuck wrangling a herd of H1Bs or serving as the "liaison" between your company and the "team" in India for years and years.

      "3 years out of school" puts a typical 4-year grad at 25-27 years old. Even with a low ceiling of 50 for a "software developer", kids at 25-27 are well below the median age. Compensation is very closely tied to experience/seniority.

      I'm well past the "3 years out of school" range, but I know others who are much closer to that age and I know the market isn't supporting a 6 figure salary as a median for them. I mean, you could probably limit your scope to silicon valley to hit that, but why would $100,000 be impressive there? That gets you a shack in the outlying slums and an hour commute each way on a good day.

    14. Re:He got it right by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Prager
      Why not quote Don Juan?
      it would be more reliable

    15. Re: He got it right by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Guess what the CEO's take as their first degree?
      English lit and business
      When they need speechwriters, bet you can guess what LIBERAL ARTS degrees are needed.

    16. Re:He got it right by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      I took the 90s reference to suggest wages are higher now, so don't grumble at mefir agreeing with you. I thought I was pretty close suggesting $50 is close to median over all devs if it's actually $49. I can't make 40 hour weeks, less vacation, make over $100k, unless you are counting paid holiday, but since devs are salary I worked on the basis of minimum hours worked. With working hours what they are in the USA the effective hourly wage is less. Headline, the UK pays less, but the gap might be less on a per hour basis given time off, but a full comparison would be PPP including taxes, healthcare, etc.

  2. Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by kiwipom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In my 20 years of working in software development, a bachelor's degree and any further is a waste of time. The best coders I've worked with are musicians as well as coders. I work in an investment bank in the risk department, I've worked on a number of systems where the Quants (all with PhDs in maths or physics) developed a prototype in C++ and mocked when we said we'd build the real system in Java. However our systems in all of the projects were at least a magnitude faster than the Quant systems, not because Java is faster than C++, but because the development team knew how to code for performance. Coding is incredibly complicated, to be good, only experience pays.

    --
    Dum spiro spero
    1. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by datavirtue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is not that complicated. People need to be trained properly. I have never met anyone who was trained properly. I taught myself and devoured blogs, books, forums for years that involved discussions around best practices, patterns, and case studies to hone myself into a professional developer. Most people devour reddit.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    2. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Agreed. This is actually the way the better developers I've known have done it.

    3. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      I want to disagree with you since I went to college but you're not wrong when you say "Coding is incredibly complicated, to be good, only experience pays". I think were college helps is to get you access to the material and equipment when no other means may exist. When I got my degree personal computers were still fairly new and expensive, 1000$ for a home setup, and that was easily a down payment on a car so homes were rushing out to buy them. My kid went into physics and you don't find my homes with linear accelerators so IMO another area where college is a good idea. My other kid has no idea what to do so local college it is until they figure it out. So it's not all a waste of time. And not everyone can be a ditch digger too.

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    4. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      homes WEREN"T rushing out to buy them. where's the edit button again?

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    5. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by mark-t · · Score: 1

      In theory, I agree... but in my experience, an employer won't even look at you sideways if you don't have any job experience experience yet and don't have that piece of paper that gets your foot in the door. You can sidestep this requirement if you happen to be well connected with the right kinds of people in your target industry, but if you don't happen to have such connections, then it doesn't matter worth shit how good you might be. Your talent will be wasted only doing things as no more than a "hobby". People who personally know you might know how good you are, but unless they are well enough connected to people in the industry that they could recommend you to get your foot in the door at some company, you're still stuck. I think that this is especially hardest felt by people who are struggling to get out of poverty, and where most of their social connections may be in a similar financial situation.

      Once you have that first chunk of real experience under your belt after graduation, your education won't matter that much anymore to future employers either... it's certainly important to know for yourself that you can do a particular job, but without that piece of paper, it's not generally going to matter whether you are good at what you or not.

    6. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Depending on what type of coding you do, you may need a lot more of education. true, most coding jobs need only some formal education, but a lot of talent, dedication and drive. But there are those that need a lot more. If you are going for one (IT security is an example), do not scoff on that education and make sure to get the most of it. I had to prove formal properties to make things work in the real world. And while that happens rarely, if it happens it is the only thing that helps. Again, most coders, even most really good coders, will never need that, but some will and there is a kind of exclusivity to the jobs you can get with those skills that is very nice.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Coding is incredibly complicated, to be good, only experience pays.

      Playing the piano is incredibly complicated, to be good, only experience pays.

      No. In my experience (with both pianos and coding) to be good you have to have a gifted talent for the work. Training and experience will at best make you a 'better than average' coder. No matter how hard you work at it. To be a really good coder you have to be born with a natural ability for it. When you meet these people it's very obvious.

      Fortunately, in today's world being an average coder is good enough in nearly all cases.

    8. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Lord+Kano · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Where I live, it's hard to get past the HR drones if you don't have at least a BS on your rèsumè. They'll bin in as soon as they see it without a 4 year degree.

      My experience with coders has been mixed. I have known some good programmers without much of an educational background in CS/IS and I have known some garbage self-taught programmers.

      When I was a co-op and finishing my BS, I was working as a programmer for a big company. One of the other guys there was a decent dotNET programmer and he was self-taught. One day, we all took about an hour to code up programs to brute force the answer to a riddle. He wrote his in C# or something and I wrote mine in PERL. Both of us got the right answer but mine executed in much less time than his. He just couldn't understand it. He had never been taught about speed.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    9. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yea, example #1000 where older people don't understand how hiring is done nowadays. A degree isn't necessary if you have experience, but to get experience you typically need a degree (or luck or good connections). People are dishonestly ignoring the distinction between an "intellectual" need and a "practical" need.

    10. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      What I learned in lectures at university was mostly a waste of time, but the experience wasn't. I had time to develop my own skills as a developer without the pressures of work.

      Well, not entirely true, I did learn that Ada is an awful language that I should avoid at all costs.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Drethon · · Score: 1

      I did a couple years programming Ada, good language if data translation mistakes are unacceptable, such as aviation. OK, well the mistakes still happen but the language catches more than the C did with basic casts.

    12. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by jwymanm · · Score: 2

      "It is not that complicated" next sentence.. "Took me years of devouring every source on the matter I could find". In other words: programming properly is complicated. Don't underestimate the amount of practice, precision, and expertise that goes into doing it just because you accomplished it after years of studying what others spent years of studying what others spent years of studying... etc. It takes constant work to even handle the updates all of your depends do these days.

    13. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Meh. Just write the fly-by-wire system in Javascript using four different frameworks like NASA does (node.js, Angular, Polymer and Facebook/React are all pretty popular this month) and you are good to fly. Naturally you want to be doing devops, so you can patch any issues on the fly.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Me too. But now I'm chasing that piece of paper so I can move up in the world. This time next week I'll have taken 3 more finals, then just 4 more classes to go for a BS in software dev. Then on to find a masters of some sort, thinking of something project management related....

      Why? Well, I work at a college and teach as an adjunct but what I can teach is limited to certificate/AS only - anything that would be accepted by a university I have to have a BS/BA plus be working on a masters, and must have masters to start tenure track (I'll retire out by then...)

      But also the days of having only experience and no degree and making it past HR to someone who can really evaluate your skills are over for the most part.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    15. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "It's not that complicated, all you have to do is spend 10,000 hours working hard to learn the fundamentals of design. All I did was read thousands of pages of books and commentary by the best developers in the world and practiced the application of their words with passionate conviction."

      It's complicated. It's unintuitive. It requires a well of creativity, an expert mind, and a very steady hand. Most people are incapable of the dedication required to become a good software developer, even if they had the inclination for it in the first place. It probably comes naturally to you, to target the right kinds of learning while avoiding the cargo cults and anti-pattern promoters. I'm sure you can look at a good algorithm or design and feel the beauty of it; understand the designer's intent and vision. Being able to do this requires much more than training. It requires dedicating a good chunk of your life to the art.

    16. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      The flip side to your argument also exists - I have worked with developers with an BS Honours degree in computing who couldn't code real world solutions to real world problems. They could talk your hind leg off when it came to theoretical stuff, but they couldn't translate that into practice.

    17. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I think: writing a simple web page is ... simple. Writing a basic mobile game, perhaps in the realm of simple still. Writing high end high speed guaranteed to process transactional code with verifiable auditing: complicated. Guess which one pays the most reliably and is the hardest to find people for?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    18. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      One of the other guys there was a decent dotNET programmer and he was self-taught. One day, we all took about an hour to code up programs to brute force the answer to a riddle. He wrote his in C# or something and I wrote mine in PERL. Both of us got the right answer but mine executed in much less time than his. He just couldn't understand it. He had never been taught about speed.

      That's what I see as well, the self-taught guys are great at the stuff they've studied or worked on previously, but occasionally they run into something they've never encountered before and they don't even recognize it as a problem. Only a few of them really try to study the craft and learn everything.

    19. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      "Coding" is a trade at this point as well. Coders could learn a lot from the way the apprenticeships are setup. You learn the basics (bootcamp) then 'train' under a master and do everything hands on.

    20. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Real software development is complicated. Anyone that says otherwise hasn't worked with successful real systems. I don't discount your career path, in fact, for the past 15 years or so new prospective developers I hired followed it exclusively because the basic college grad just wasn't worth hiring. Not sure what happened to colleges since just before 2000, but the quality of supposed software folks with degrees dropped off a cliff.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    21. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by sexconker · · Score: 1

      CompTIA Security+ is a joke. I'm certified, and I don't plan on renewing it, despite it being "expected" of me by my employer (not gonna happen).

      "Oh, but if you want more in depth / specific / practical certification, you need to go for this other course, just pay more $$$. Don't forget to keep up with your continuing education credits to keep your certs valid!!"

      No, fuck you. Stop selling crappy certs that only certify someone memorized your shitty book and took your crappy test with broken questions, incorrect answers, etc. Most of the effort involved memorizing different types of old timey fire extinguishers.

    22. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      >When I was a co-op and finishing my BS, I was working as a programmer for a big company. One of the other guys there was a decent dotNET programmer and he was self-taught. One day, we all took about an hour to code up programs to brute force the answer to a riddle. He wrote his in C# or something and I wrote mine in PERL. Both of us got the right answer but mine executed in much less time than his. He just couldn't understand it. He had never been taught about speed.

      Hard to believe, isn't it?

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    23. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by jma05 · · Score: 2

      Getting a PhD is very little about coding, even with a CS PhD. Expecting so would be the equivalent of expecting a novelist to be as fast as a professional typist.

      No one gets a PhD to become a superior coder, nor do they mostly even care. Math and Physics PhDs typically code better than an average coder, only because they are generally intelligent to begin with, not much because of any training and experience they received while doing their PhD. Of course, they cannot out-code a professional in a competitive position, with decades of experience in just coding.

      The CS PhDs I know will solve (practical) problems barely even understood by an average coder. Don't dismiss them because they can't tune a JVM or grok a new Javascript framework as quickly.

      And I would not say that a Bachelors in CS does not help a coder. College formally teaches foundations for which there is little incentive to learn on your own if you are too market focused. For those that lack it, the deficit will always insidiously effect the quality of work.

    24. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      This story is not about computers it is about the labour trades. You know plumbers, electricians, carpenters not software coders. The problem is they need training and apprenticeships and need to know the rules and standards and need to be properly licensed. The problem is myopic corporate types do not want to pay for training, they do not want a long term work force, they way a disposable work force, more profit now, fuck the problems latter, some one else's problem. That is the problem that has to be solved.

      There is a three for one solution that will work really well, which they will not accepted because less profit. That is the base unit of the military should not be infantry, they should be combat engineers, higher skills and higher training and they can be taught trades as part of that training, full apprenticeships. Rather than having them idle, more money can be saved by getting them to apply their training on government infrastructure projects. You have already paid their salaries, bought the equipment and so you only need to pay for the materials to complete major projects. See three for one, better quality more highly trained military. A lot of trained high skill labour available post military training. Major infrastructures projects done so much cheaper, with something like half to two thirds already being paid for in military expenditure.

      Will they do it. Absolutely not, where is the opportunity for corrupt contracts, for millions even billions to be stolen in shonky corrupt deals, negotiated by lobbyists and paid for by campaign donations. Absolutely no way common sense can be served ahead of myopic insatiable greed, just not the American way.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    25. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Cederic · · Score: 1

      any two reasonable people faced with the same challenge, will create similar solutions

      Will they fuck.

      I learned how to program in my head by thinking about problems around the age of 6.

      Sounds to me like you've never learned to program. You've learned to solve problems. They're very different skills.

    26. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Cederic · · Score: 1

      You need exp and CS to do it right.

      What you've described though has sweet fuck all to do with computer science. It's basic software engineering.

    27. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Cederic · · Score: 1

      As an older person I'm very aware and also probably help perpetuate it.

      Recruiting people with experience, the experience matters and not the degree. Recruiting someone without experience? We approach friendly universities and steal their top talent in that year's graduating class.

      The answer is to either get a degree, or get experience outside of employment. There are countless stories of people creating or contributing to open source projects being headhunted, and that's got nothing to do with their education.

    28. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yes, but was his readable, maintainable, bug free, extensible and serviceable?

      I mean, at university I delivered a solution that did in seven seconds what most of the class' solutions were taking eight minutes to complete, but nobody taught me that, I just had fun optimising the fuck out of it. That doesn't mean it was good code.

      I provided a working solution to the programming test of a job interview once with an algorithm that had a memory leak and shite performance. I also documented those, told them how to fix it and pointed out that the sample data set didn't suffer from those issues and it wasn't worth my time or theirs to optimise further.

      They loved it. Real companies know that perfection costs too much and that execution speed is seldom the primary concern.

    29. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I once inherited some code from a guy who was self-taught. He'd only taught himself one form of loop.

      I don't remember off the top of my head if it was the test-at-the-top or ~bottom form. I *do* remember the clusterfuck of auxiliary flags and tests he used to shoehorn one into the other.

      He hadn't taught himself local data either. A100_first_time_round_flg, first_time_round_flg_b300a ...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    30. Re: Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Most "senior" developers understand how to develop class hierarchies using design patterns, if you're lucky. Algorithms are something one downloads or reads about, not something one develops.

    31. Re: Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by reanjr · · Score: 1

      Too many people like to write code. The code left unwritten is often the best code, and you won't know that you're writing good code if you never stop coding to take a look, or - at the very least - you're ripping out stuff as you go.

      There's something to be said for working code, but the long term viability of well structured, documented, broken code beats thrown together working code any day.

    32. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      makes sense, music is code just alike ... but i dont see why degrees matter in programming since the only thing you need is !a_life and muleclass stubbornness b/c like art, you can teach someone to draw a perfect circle, but you wont teach anyone to be a dali aquila non captat muscas if you wanna do Latin there, i'll double up o wait ... thats clearly not Latin :X

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    33. Re:Bachelor's degree a waste of time for coders by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I have seen that too.

      I think formal education coupled with a genuine interest in the subject matter and some aptitude is the right balance.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  3. Looked down on by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason for this is the current generation looks down on blue collar work thinking that its beneath them. This myth is propagated by many high schools with the elimination of shop and auto mechanics classes.

    This isn't helped at the university level where lots of liberal teachers preach that blue collar workers are nothing but a bunch of dumb hicks that are not smart enough to find something better.

    Truth be told lots of the blue collar work today requires ether at least one advanced degree or months of apprenticeship.

    --
    I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    1. Re:Looked down on by Ryanrule · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You had a good point until you went foolish in the second paragraph.

    2. Re:Looked down on by KixWooder · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This isn't helped at the university level where lots of liberal teachers preach that blue collar workers are nothing but a bunch of dumb hicks that are not smart enough to find something better.

      Eight years of college/grad school and I never, not even once, heard anything remotely close to that.

      Enough with the hyperbole.

      --
      I hate fat people.
    3. Re:Looked down on by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Informative

      Still a good point and it is true. But I guess it depends on what state you are in. Less so in the midwest and south. But more true in the new england and west cost regions.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    4. Re:Looked down on by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      They don't say it directly. It comes from constantly promoting office jobs as the thing to aim for while ignoring and marginalizing trades.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    5. Re:Looked down on by Etcetera · · Score: 3, Interesting

      8 years of undergrad (long story) and I heard that on several occasions at my west-coast state university. Moreso after going back in the 2008-2011 time frame than in the late 90s time frame.

      I was in a lot of humanities classes and the comments invariably came from the more left-wing professors. Ironically, it wasn't the pure thought ones (I ended up with a Philosophy BA), but the Political Science/Sociology ones that were usually the worst.

    6. Re:Looked down on by GLMDesigns · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Except that was my experience also. I worked my way through college working as a roofer and carpenter. I had more than one professors turned their nose up at it saying that I wouldn't "learn" anything by working as a carpenter. They said working in a book store would be better (it was a fraction of my take home pay).

      It took me 8 years to finish college but I didn't have a cent of student debt.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    7. Re:Looked down on by aix+tom · · Score: 2

      The time in my life where I learned the most was probably my (German) electrician apprenticeship (which took three and a half years)

      From interaction with panicked customers, to finding the fault in some obscure decades old machinery, to changing tires in a snowstorm, and even going out binge-drinking with colleagues.

      Then I switched to IT during the dot-com boom at the turn of the millennium (because back then IT was way cooler). But I'm currently thinking about going "back out" for the last 10-15 years of my career. Because now IT is becoming more and more un-cool with all the bean-counters and lawyers invading all the nooks and crannies of technology.

    8. Re:Looked down on by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      They don't say it directly. It comes from constantly promoting office jobs as the thing to aim for while ignoring and marginalizing trades.

      You mean from teachers, at a university, teaching things appropriate for an office job, to students presumably there to learn things for an office job? While people learning trade skills are presumably at trade schools learning things appropriate for trade jobs. Even at schools that offer both types of education, you'd only be exposed to those teachers teaching the things you wanted to learn, for the type of job you wanted.

      So... your argument makes no actual sense; stop projecting.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:Looked down on by apoc.famine · · Score: 2

      Like the GP, I disagree, and I a) come from a blue collar family, and b) spent about a decade in college doing various degrees. Not only were office jobs not promoted, the trades weren't ever marginalized. I don't know if you've ever gone to college, but having done so three times, my experience was that there was a distinct lack of career planning, and most of the focus was on learning new shit.

      Hell, the last time I went to grad school we worked with the trades all the time to maintain the infrastructure for research. University union trades, and other than the occasional bit of "not my job" stupidity, most were competent, hard workers vital to what we were doing. You don't ask hungover graduate students to run 220v lines to giant computing clusters, nor do you ask them to adjust the HVAC to ensure proper ventilation and climate control.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    10. Re:Looked down on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The root of the problem is that "portion of graduates who go on to attend college" became a metric on which highschools were judged.

      The choice to cut trade relevant classes where retaining and expanding classes like SAT prep and programs like Athletics when faced with budget concerns stems from the desire to maximize that metric. As does the trend to advise student to pursue the college prep track regardless of aptitude in academics.

    11. Re:Looked down on by mlw4428 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you have examples? Specifics? I keep seeing this myth propagated and all I get back is "well dude this one professor TOTALLY said that in between his EEEBILL LIBERAL HIPPIE LECTURES".

    12. Re:Looked down on by jwhyche · · Score: 3

      Education needs de-funded

      I don't believe education needs to be de-funded. What I believe it needs to be is de-centrulized. I've observed for the past administrations, they seem to want to bring all education under one directly controlled off. An have one core plan that is implemented across the nation.

      This would work if all school districts where the same. Well they are not. A class room plan designed for the south side of Chicago will not work in South California. The cultures are to different.

      I believe that all the administrations, including the current, make the same mistake in thinking that their core supporters represent a majority in the country. The Obama administration drafted a progressive education plan that suited its goals. The Trump administration is doing the exact same thing but with a conservative slant.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    13. Re:Looked down on by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      The trouble stems not so much from the top, but the bottom. There are countless men and women at the bottom, permanently stuck there due to lack handholds to grab from which to pull themselves up. If people truly wanted to make a major impact on poverty and all the associated issues surrounding it, they'd accommodate the challenges preventing people from getting the education they need to enter these trade jobs. It's basically impossible for poverty wage earners to afford the time and most especially money required to get the schooling necessary to learn a trade skill. The more immediate needs simply put it out of reach. Work for welfare initiatives only exacerbate these challenges.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    14. Re:Looked down on by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can't outsource a plumber. Or an auto mechanic. Maybe they can find someone a little bit cheaper, but you're not competing with people on the other side of the world.

      But in IT, we have American universities outsourcing to India , even though they could get cheap student labor (it's how I got started; my undergrad is CivE).

      But unless you have a specialist niche, you are easily replaced. Or at least, management thinks so. (I've been fired/"let go" twice, and both times it took three people to replace me as I have a strange combination of skills; and both tried getting me to come back afterwards)

      My older brother is a college dropout who made more money than me (master's degree) as an auto mechanic. He changed jobs last year (to advising car dealerships) because he didn't want to work every other Saturday now that he has three young kids ... and he still makes more than me.

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    15. Re:Looked down on by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Everything worth doing is worth doing well. And everybody that can do valuable things really well deserves respect for that. I mean, the difference between an experiences and capable craftsman and a burger-flipper is about as large as that between the burger-flipper and an engineer or a scientist. Society has forgotten who actually keeps things working and troubleshoots all the problems. Theory is worthless unless you can apply it to something. Yet a lot of academics cannot or produce spectacularly bad results to the point that they have massive negative productivity.

      Things will get really interesting when automation will take a lot of jobs in the next 20 years or so. Be a mid-level bureaucrat with a college degree? You are very much going to be replaced. But be a plumber that makes his customers happy by fixing their problems? Not so much.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    16. Re:Looked down on by gweihir · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A lot of academics would benefit hugely from working as a roofer or carpenter for a year or so. It provides a connection to _reality_. For engineers it is so invaluable that some really good universities require something like it.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    17. Re:Looked down on by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 5, Interesting

      True facts:
      Of all the engineers I've worked with my entire life, the best ones are almost always the ones who were technicians while they were working through college.
      One of the best engineers I've ever worked with didn't even have a college degree, but a body of work (read as: real-life experience) that exceeded a college degree.
      Having a college degree doesn't mean you actually know anything -- or that you know how to do anything. Experience is still King.
      On the Internet, I've had conversations with (?) kids playing around with Arduinos and Raspberry Pis who thought that all 'analog electronics' was 'old-fashioned' and 'obsolete' and that 'nobody uses that stuff for anything anymore, everything is digital'. Imagine the denial and arguments that ensued when I started educating them that without so-called 'obsolete, old-fashioned' analog electronics, none of their microcontrollers would even exist.

      Without intelligent, hard-working people willing to get their hands dirty, we wouldn't have houses to live in, roads to drive on, cars to drive on those roads, food to eat, clean water coming out of the tap, or pretty much anything else you care to name -- and without all the infrastructure, there wouldn't be any 'high tech' or much of anything else. We'd all be scratching in the dirt trying just to survive. I've met some pretty damned intelligent and creative people who aren't working in high tech fields, because they enjoy working with their hands. Looking down on someone who is 'blue collar' is ridiculous.

    18. Re:Looked down on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not just the current generation that looks down on blue-collar jobs, it dual income, snobby suburbanites in general. Young and old.

      As a society, we're so materialistic in today's world, a lot of people lost touch with many things. They lose touch with nature. Lose touch with an honest days work. Lose touch with people who have trade skills like engineering, electrical, plumbing, etc. For f@ck's sake, half the people around here can't or won't even mow their postage stamp lawn. They just hire it out to whoever.

      At least us backwater Midwest folks (who the east coast and west coast snots look down on) can not only hold down six figure jobs, but we pay less than 1/3 for real estate as our coastal yuppial friends, but we can fix our own leaky faucets, mow our own lawns (can actually afford to have lawns out here), take down game to eat, and do all sorts of stuff civilized modern metrosexuals can't do.

    19. Re:Looked down on by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      "There is not a single well-to-do liberal."

      FTFY.

      There's a whole lot in the washington DC area. Most ride in limousines.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    20. Re:Looked down on by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't believe education needs to be de-funded. What I believe it needs to be is de-centrulized.

      This suggests that education needs more funding, not less...a lot more.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    21. Re:Looked down on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As someone who went to a New England university, I NEVER heard any of my professors disparage blue collar work. In fact, the subject never came up, because why the hell would it? We attended class to learn Computer Science, Chemistry, Calculus, Physics, Biology, and hell even Art Appreciation. The biggest rant any one of my profs went on was a bizarre 2 minute tangent about sock drawers while talking about computer memory.

      Popular media, however, does a fine job portraying blue collar workers as a bunch of dumb hicks. Everything from reality TV to sitcoms to the news. Hell, a lot of blue collar workers actively embrace the stereotype because they don't want to be thought of as "elites" wagging their finger from atop the ivory tower and lecturing people about how to live their life. That the kind of person they can't stand!

    22. Re:Looked down on by flappinbooger · · Score: 2

      You can't outsource a plumber. Or an auto mechanic. Maybe they can find someone a little bit cheaper, but you're not competing with people on the other side of the world.

      when the last plumber dies we're all in deep shit.

      They don't teach kids how to swing a hammer or read a tape measure any more. They have no practical manual labor skills whatsoever. Helpless.

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    23. Re:Looked down on by jwhyche · · Score: 3

      Well damn. That is probably one of the best written things I've read here on /.. Well done.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    24. Re:Looked down on by Dorianny · · Score: 1

      It could be a Liberal conspiracy to turn our kids into hippies, or perhaps the kids have realized the Robots are already here and high paying trades jobs are first on their sensory inputs

    25. Re: Looked down on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In my 2 years in a Chicago school and 2 years in a New York school this literally never once happened. Not remotely.

      The closest I ever got to the "liberal" professor stereotype was a Central American History teacher who was clearly opposed to US intervention, believing it led to the current poverty and danger in the region.

      At no point did she ever imply she looked down on blue collars.

      I managed to survive college and stay conservative. So did all my friends. This is a stupid myth. What I did pick up in college was a strong aversion to lies, like this all-too-common one.

    26. Re:Looked down on by Tyr07 · · Score: 1

      Years actually, like it takes 4 years in apprenticeships to become an electrician.

    27. Re:Looked down on by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      It isn't foolish, that was the exact attitude when I was in highschool and college.

    28. Re:Looked down on by swb · · Score: 1

      A lot of parents drilled this into heads, including mine.

      I think there was a strong sense that they were denied entry into some aspect of life because they weren't college educated. We lived a fairly average middle class type life, but even growing up there seemed to be a subtle snubbing of my parents by other parents on our block who were college educated. My dad owned his own business and drove Cadillacs, so it wasn't like we were economically blue collar, either, and at least one of the families that seemed snobby were worse off financially.

      The whole trades job thing would probably attract more people if the working conditions weren't so shitty. A $10/office flunky gets treated so much better than a $25 tradesperson.

    29. Re:Looked down on by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      What makes you think personal experience is a myth?
      Sounds like you just didn't like what he had to say.

    30. Re: Looked down on by Izuzan · · Score: 1

      Even jordan peterson thinks the same thing.

    31. Re:Looked down on by ArylAkamov · · Score: 2

      Same here, ended up being an electrician for several years while the people that called me a dumb hick worked at fast food joints with their worthless degrees.

    32. Re:Looked down on by ArylAkamov · · Score: 2

      Ah yes, because YOU, personally, have never experienced this, it hasn't happened to anyone.

    33. Re:Looked down on by dev-in-seattle · · Score: 1

      The reason for this is the current generation looks down on blue collar work thinking that its beneath them. [...]

      This isn't helped at the university level where lots of liberal teachers preach that blue collar workers are nothing but a bunch of dumb hicks that are not smart enough to find something better.

      [...]

      Trimmed it down a bit. That's just an ignorant viewpoint. Suppose I said "My very conservative Republican father thinks people who don't go to college are idiots". An anecdote like yours or mine don't prove anything about how liberals or conservatives generally feel, it's just hateful ignorant speech that's trying to push people in a certain direction. If anything, my liberal friends think we should provide training to people for the fields that need them, like factory worker jobs that can't be filled. We want to help people and we see the value of those jobs. Of course you must discount my views because I'm a liberal in Seattle.

    34. Re:Looked down on by dev-in-seattle · · Score: 2
      Second post above:

      There is not a single well-to-do liberal who sends their kid to regular public school.

      Then above

      "There is not a single well-to-do liberal."

      FTFY.

      Both of these are silly posts. I'm fortunate to be an overpaid software engineer, I'm liberal, I'm well to do, I went to public school and so do my children.

    35. Re:Looked down on by mlw4428 · · Score: 2

      Anecdotal isn't a strong indicator of anything. What he said was "This isn't helped at the university level where lots of liberal teachers preach that blue collar workers are nothing but a bunch of dumb hicks that are not smart enough to find something better." Unless his personal experience is with 10s of thousands of teachers (there are something like 1.7 million post-secondary teachers) his "lots" could in fact be a very small, insignificant number and thus his entire point/anger is entirely disproportional to the level of impact.

    36. Re:Looked down on by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Do you ride a high horse about the wonders of our public school system? Private school is not that much, well worth it. Not exclusive bullshit that limits acceptance. There are private schools that are really just flexible day schools for people who are primarily "home schooled." Pleasant, no drama, and no pomp snobbery.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    37. Re:Looked down on by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      The funding is always under the auspice of social engineering. The government doesn't know any better or any other way.

      When you give the government control of money they will always use it to buy votes. The only real debate is about which party will get to direct the money. In the end it doesn't matter.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    38. Re:Looked down on by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I agree. What you want requires leadership. If a president tried to go to the people to de-militarize you would see all number of atrocities flare on this planet---starting with his/her assassination. I would love to demilitarize but it is a revolutionary change unfortunately and a lot of people would die for peace.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    39. Re:Looked down on by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      It's cheap and easy to run courses on theory: Large lectures, minimal formative assessment (feedback) if any, essay grading (by TAs, not tutors), and machine gradable tests. There's very little evidence of transfer of knowledge and skills acquired from this kind of education. In other words, students learn how to be students but not much else, e.g. student essays are typically unique genres of writing which aren't replicated anywhere else in professional or personal life. It's more like a right of passage than anything meaningful or useful.

      Teaching/training students to actually be able to do more than write generically redundant essays and pass tests is more difficult and more involved. It also requires more individual attention from tutors/mentors, formative assessment, and assessments that call for involved expert judgement. Vocational training is typically more expensive and more highly skilled to provide and often higher quality than theoretical courses.

      Also, not many people think of medicine, law, architecture, etc., as training. They may happen in universities and have all the prestige, but they're essentially advanced vocational training programmes.

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
    40. Re:Looked down on by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      The reason for this is the current generation looks down on blue collar work thinking that its beneath them.

      This is nothing new...same mode of thinking at least since the Baby Boomers.

      At least...the last part of them. You were looked down upon if not white collar.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    41. Re:Looked down on by Green+Mountain+Bot · · Score: 1

      You do realize that pretty much every institution in history has been formed with the explicit purpose of "social engineering", as you put it, right?

    42. Re:Looked down on by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Blue collar work *is* beneath me. It always was

      An this attitude would make you part of the problem, now doesn't it?

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    43. Re:Looked down on by jwhyche · · Score: 3

      Truth. Don't get me wrong, just because I talk demilitarization I'm not blind to realities that we live in. There are evil shits in places of power in the world and sometimes the only thing that holds them back is some one with a bigger stick. It is a sad state of affairs but it is the world we were born into.

      I'm very much anti nuclear weapons but I believe that our nuclear weapons program needs to be modernized. It is a odd view but then again we have to deal with the evil shits. The only thing that keeps them from starting a nuclear war is the fact there is someone out there that is better at it than they are.

      Such is the state of our sad little world.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    44. Re: Looked down on by Strider- · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I come from the opposite end of the political spectrum, but I really wish that there were more conservative people like you. As an ardent progressive, I actually really enjoy lively (and respectful) debate that challenges the preconceived notions I may carry.

      TL;DR: You and I would probably disagree on pretty much everything, but would enjoy having a beer.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    45. Re:Looked down on by Strider- · · Score: 1

      I'm an EE by training (though on the light side of the world, where 12V is "High Voltage"). Some of the best things I've learned are from the times when I've volunteered for a non-profit and wound up playing gopher and assistant for a journeyman electrician.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    46. Re:Looked down on by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      It took me 8 years to finish college but I didn't have a cent of student debt.

      That may or may not be a good thing. If you're making $80k out of college, those 4 extra years of not working adds up to $320k, which is probably a lot more than your student debt.

    47. Re:Looked down on by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Education needs de-funded.

      Your education "needs improved" if you write like that.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    48. Re:Looked down on by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      They don't say it directly. It comes from constantly promoting office jobs as the thing to aim for while ignoring and marginalizing trades.

      So it's microaggression?

      If that is enough to turn you away, then you're not cut out for blue collar work.

    49. Re:Looked down on by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      It's not just the current generation. People in general have a dislike of any job requiring manual labor and they tend to look down on those who have jobs where you might actually work up a sweat.

      It goes the other way, too. I hear blue-collar workers say that people who have desk jobs aren't really working. They joke about it when one of their own moves up into management by saying stuff like, "Yeah, he's got a job now with all the work slung out of it."

      All work is valuable and we need people to do all types of jobs, from desk jockey to ditch diggers. It's best to appreciate anybody who works for a living no matter what they do.

      You can joke about plumbers until you need one. You can joke about doctors until you need one. You can joke about slashdot forever because nobody really needs it.

    50. Re:Looked down on by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      This myth is propagated by many high schools with the elimination of shop and auto mechanics classes.

      Real question, how much more/less/different 'auto mechanics' will be needed once we move to fully electric cars?

    51. Re: Looked down on by poity · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the media constantly referring to those without a college degree as "uneducated" voters.

      And they'll in the same article laud the "highly educated" voters, which encompasses PhD 's in literary criticism and gender bullshittery but does not encompass BSc's in physics or math.

      Ah yes, we should all aspire to not be "uneducated", and to strive to be "highly educated".

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    52. Re:Looked down on by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "He is a violently psychotic unmedicated mentally ill lunatic who has never made a single cogent post in all the time I've noticed his particular brand of insanity."

      Current "Informative" post count: Well over 3,000.

      You must simply not read, or you're too stupid to comprehend anything which you do read.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    53. Re:Looked down on by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      They don't say it directly. It comes from constantly promoting office jobs as the thing to aim for while ignoring and marginalizing trades.

      Is that what one person said to you once and so you extrapolated that across the tens of thousands teachers across the country? Interesting technique....

    54. Re:Looked down on by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      I agree. What you want requires leadership. If a president tried to go to the people to de-militarize you would see all number of atrocities flare on this planet---starting with his/her assassination. I would love to demilitarize but it is a revolutionary change unfortunately and a lot of people would die for peace.

      You don't need to demilitarise, just don't treat military spending like oxygen. The US could divert 10% of their military spend to education and it would double their budget. The end result is a stronger country, so it is effective a defence spend as well.

    55. Re:Looked down on by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      Truth. Don't get me wrong, just because I talk demilitarization I'm not blind to realities that we live in. There are evil shits in places of power in the world and sometimes the only thing that holds them back is some one with a bigger stick. It is a sad state of affairs but it is the world we were born into.

      Those evil shits are you. Think about it, the biggest security issue today is Islamic fundamentalism created by the pro-stick mentality in the US We need military, but a smart, useful military not a big dumb one that starts wars they haven't thought about how to finish (Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq - not many successes there).

    56. Re:Looked down on by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      It took me 8 years to finish college but I didn't have a cent of student debt.

      That may or may not be a good thing. If you're making $80k out of college, those 4 extra years of not working adds up to $320k, which is probably a lot more than your student debt.

      I know here in Kommifornia that 4 years would definitely not get you $320K in hand. You would be lucky to keep $225 and that's before food and rent. The real figure is more like $120k, which may or may not be equal to student loans depending on where you go and how high the cost of living is.

    57. Re:Looked down on by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      This isn't helped at the university level where lots of liberal teachers preach that blue collar workers are nothing but a bunch of dumb hicks that are not smart enough to find something better.

      Eight years of college/grad school and I never, not even once, heard anything remotely close to that. Enough with the hyperbole.

      It's not hyperbole depending on where you go. I had a couple of humanities classes that were very much in this vein. I went to school in southern California, which is probably an important data point. Plus it's gotten worse. The microagression BS hadn't caught on yet when I was in school.

    58. Re:Looked down on by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      You can't outsource a plumber. Or an auto mechanic.

      That's why billionaires on both the right (Koch bros, etc) and the left (Zucker and crew) want mass immigration. When you can't bring the job to the low cost labor you bring the low cost labor to the job. The middle class is shrinking because the 1% absolutely hates it and has been working hard for several generations to get rid of it. Both D and R are happy to help.

    59. Re:Looked down on by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Those evil shits are you.

      Spoken like someone with little knowledge of real history. Spend more time in history and world political science and learn more about what has happened in the world in the last 70 years. Then come back and try again.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    60. Re:Looked down on by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      The anecdotal evidence was presented to show that it does exist.

      I agree that reading is important. I have a MA in history (intellectual history, development of technology) so obviously I agree that reading is important. However, stocking shelves at a bookstore for minimum wage is not superior to learning a trade. I own a house and my experience has saved me 1000s of dollars.

      Also, I graduated without any student debt. Zero.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
    61. Re:Looked down on by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      bullshit. teachers didnt say shit to us about any such topics.

    62. Re:Looked down on by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      If you really make $120k after 4 years of work, then it's almost exactly the same as your loans for going to some place like UC Berkeley for 4 years (in-state). However, by then you'd have 4 years of work experience, and you should be getting raises or looking for better paying work. If instead you spent 8 years in school, then you're still a new-grad looking to get new-grad pay.

    63. Re:Looked down on by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      I don't recall going to school with anyone named 'Ryanrule'.

    64. Re:Looked down on by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      I assume you never went to any college, where liberals point out that the person being fucked by the elite is a blue collar worker trying to live off the scraps left by Dynastic Inheritors.
      So, idiot.

    65. Re:Looked down on by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Who says it was personal experience?
      The claimant?
      Glad you don't teach logic.

    66. Re:Looked down on by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Both of us, along with a few others in the comments. Just because you don't want to believe it doesn't make it fake.

    67. Re:Looked down on by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You are an idiot. Please do a bit of research what universities do this in what courses and what their standing in international ratings is. Then realize that you just spouted complete nonsense. Incidentally, it is usually not a year, but more like 2 times 3 months or something like it.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    68. Re:Looked down on by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Just because you SAY it, it must be fake, given you bring no supporting information whatever

    69. Re:Looked down on by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Ah, of course. Excuse me while I do a scientific study of my own experiences in life and get it peer reviewed.

    70. Re:Looked down on by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I never got that vibe from the colleges/universities themselves. It was more the high school guidance counselors (and to lessor extent, some of the teachers there) which looked at you like you were nuts if you said your plans after high school was anything other than attending a 4-year university of some sort.

      Once you were there, the colleges didn't seem so concerned with retaining the student.s They were more than happy to take your money and flunk you out.

    71. Re:Looked down on by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone with little knowledge of real history.

      The no true Scotsmen fallacy. Good work...

      Spend more time in history and world political science and learn more about what has happened in the world in the last 70 years. Then come back and try again.

      Well you showed me with that indepth analysis. Here let me show you how it works:
      America invaded Korea. Result: still going 70 years later
      America invaded Vietnam. Result they lost but nothing bad actually happened so proved the whole adventure was a complete waste of time, money and lives.
      America invaded Iraq. Result: Never actually thought past what happens after you start a war, still going, now turned escalated into Syria and involving Russia, possibly creating a second cold war which could have impacts for decades to come. Pure genius.
      America invaded Afghanistan. Result still going after 15 years for no reason costing many lives and money.
      Which part of that don't you agree with? I won't expect a logical response, we know how your type works.

    72. Re:Looked down on by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      So, what you bring is mere anecdote and pass it off as fact
      Trump.
      Get it?

    73. Re:Looked down on by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Hey man, there's no peer reviewed paper saying either of us are real. You're just a bot talking to another bot. Get it?

    74. Re:Looked down on by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      So, you have nothing to say that is true?
      Since I'm not claiming any anecdote....get it?

    75. Re:Looked down on by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Nope, guess not since neither of us exist...get it?

    76. Re:Looked down on by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      So, you have nothing to say that is true
      Get it? Your anecdotal claims are worthless as, apparently, are your brains.

    77. Re:Looked down on by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      I never said they were worth anything, nice strawman though. All I shared was my personal experience, nothing more. Sorry for offending you ;)

    78. Re:Looked down on by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      So you have nothing to offer but your prejudices and lies.
      Well color me shocked.
      Nice try chump

  4. How long are jobs like this going to last? by hicitusficitus · · Score: 1

    I get that there is a high demand for these types of jobs; However, with all the advances in AI and robotics, are skilled trades going to be viable careers in the next 20 years? I think a lot of jobs are going to continue to be outsourced or automated. I know several people whose jobs got replaced by robotics or software.

    1. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If we get to the point where an AI robot can perform electrical old work in a 50+ year old building, then nobody is going to have a job, and we have bigger economical problems.

    2. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by Mr3vil · · Score: 1

      Bricklayers have been told machines are coming for their jobs for decades and it has yet to happen in spite of some REALLY good attempts at mechanizing the task.

    3. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Is a robot going to put a heat exchanger on the back of a truck, unload it, hook it up, program it, and verify that it works properly? You are a dumb ass.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    4. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      We will all be dressing in togas debating the mysteries of the unseen.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    5. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

      Explain to the class how you think it is that a minimum wage drone on the other side of the planet is going to fix your sink when the faucet starts leaking, or how an "AI robot" is going to build forms for the concrete staircase you want built on your back porch?

    6. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by cdecoro · · Score: 1

      It will be centuries before robots are able to perform basic jobs as plumber, electrician, drywaller, or carpenter (speaking as someone who has both done these tasks, and hired numerous people to perform these tasks). I had an apartment with two water pipes that were outside the wall, from floor to ceiling, and I wanted to put them behind the wall. Consider the range of tasks that he had to perform:

      The plumber had to cut open the drywall, cut open the floor, cut off the pipes above the ceiling and below the floor, move the old pipes behind the plane of the wall and find a wooden crossbeam to which a fastener could be attached to secure the pipe, drill holes through studs to fit the new flex tubing, attach new fittings to the flex tubing, solder the fittings to the old pipes, cut new drywall to rough shape, screw the new drywall patch to the studs, and apply two coats of plaster with tape, and then sand down the plaster to make it smooth. And then someone had to paint the wall.

      I can't imagine how complex a robot and AI you would have to have in order to perform all of those tasks. Even if you could build one that could do a half-reasonable job, it would cost a fortune. But a trained person can do it in a relatively straightforward manner, without extraordinary cost (in my case, a couple hours total time, and about $400). Yet although that was much cheaper than a robot, its still a very decent wage for the plumber.

    7. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by urusan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm normally bullish on AI, but this is one of the hardest types of work to automate.

      Consider that a plumber has to go to a site, which could very well have a completely non-standard layout and plumbing design, then troubleshoot the problem and fix whatever is wrong with it at the lowest cost, which generally means figuring out some sort of hack. Replacing parts (or worse yet, whole systems) is a last resort due to their expense, and even when this happens getting the new parts put in may be complicated. It's completely non-routine work.

      If you want to see where AI is on this, look at the recent DARPA Robotics Challenge. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... While it's amazing that these high end robots can do some of these simple tasks in the field, they're not even close to humans right now, and the complexity of these courses is nothing compared to real work.

      Where AI will completely displace human labor in the near future is in areas where the labor is either already quite routine and in a reasonably well-controlled or standardized environment or where we can use clever tricks to simplify the work to make it more amenable to automation (ex. replacing bridge tollkeepers with license plate reading cameras). This is why, for instance, you see intense interest in delivery drones compared to delivery ground robots, because they can simply fly over the complexity of someone's yard to deliver a package and it's easier to ask a homeowner to provide a dropoff pad than a dropoff path. Similarly, self-driving cars seem smarter than they really are because they rely on a standardized environment and they simply need to drive more safely than the humans that have relatively terrible reaction times, limited sensors, constantly break the rules of safe driving, and can easily get distracted or inebriated. People don't care about the otherwise lowered quality of driving service if they're able to goof off while in the vehicle.

      The reason AI is important is because a lot of our current jobs fit this description (many of the top job categories in the US are highly automatable), and not because AI is ready to take on all work anytime soon. When it is, we'll have a much bigger socioeconomic revolution on our hands than that caused by a mere lack of jobs. If that happens within 20 years time, you'll not have to worry about a job, whether that's because your livelihood has been separated from your labor or because you're more worried about the robot soldiers hunting you down.

    8. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Some trades are threatened, but most of the next automation wave will target bureaucrats, insurance agencies and other desk-workers. There is no way to automatize the jobs of most craftsmen anytime soon. I mean they are currently still working out the basics of "printing" very simple houses. Automated document processing and creation of offers is something that worked to a degree 30 years ago. Maybe in 50 years things will look different, but a competent craftsman is about as safe as a competent engineer and that is a pretty good position.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    9. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Indeed. There are some promising new technologies, but even they are targeted only at marking it easier for the bricklayer, not at a full replacement. And they are years from market-readiness and there still are a lot of kinks to work out. Maybe bricklayers will have a job crisis in 20 years, or maybe not. Incidentally, the same is true for welders. There is some impressive automatic welding equipment today, but it is all special purpose. And have a special skill like welding stainless steel, and you may be really sought after.

      That said, if you are a mediocre or bad craftsman, your prospects may not be that good after all.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Not anytime soon. Eventually, it may happen, but for that 50-100 years is a realistic perspective.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      A craftsman that does these things usually has the same hourly rate as a good engineer and deservedly so.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    12. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I fully agree. This is way more complicated than most people think. A good craftsman needs to use his brain! And there is not even a dim glimmer of intelligence to be had in "AI" these days and it is unclear whether that will ever happen. What is available today is "automation" and it can be dumb very, very fast. That solves some problems nicely and is completely ineffective for others. Most things craftsmen and engineers do are not even remotely within reach of automation.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      As a software engineer it is my duty to eliminate as many office jobs as possible.

      I think in general there's a basic wrong thinking when it comes to workforce multiplier technologies (the bots and software). There's a fear followed by a knee jerk to protect the humans, protect the status quo. As obvious as it sounds it still isn't being understood. "Progress does not come from standing still." Contrary to a certain demographic, what made(kes) America great weren't coal mines; it didn't come from shunning the automobile because we wanted to keep farriers in business. It is the relentless drive to climb to the top. Automobile factory jobs aren't what made America great. Those only came after Henry Ford's innovations. After Tesla's, Edison's, Honeywell's, Carnegie's, Morgan's, ... If you are not constantly turning over your workforce, to apply them to new innovation you do so at your own peril. The rest of the world isn't standing still. Coal is fading, solar, wind, geothermal, maybe 20 years from now fusion, are replacing those jobs. Time to move on. Stop fearing what you're losing and grab hold of what you stand to gain.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    14. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by dev-in-seattle · · Score: 1

      If we get to the point where an AI robot can perform electrical old work in a 50+ year old building, then nobody is going to have a job, and we have bigger economical problems.

      Did you see the article where they were replacing people in alaska who launch weather balloons with automated launchers? I can imagine a world where it's easier to tear down the old building and build a new one instead of repairing it, just like we treat a lot of consumer goods today.

    15. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      I'll never forget a TV show I saw where they talked to AI experts about how smart AI was, they placed it somewhere around the equivalent to the problem solving ability of a cockroach.

      Human level smarts of an AI aren't even on the radar right now. We've barely gotten to the point where the AI can identify different objects and figure out the edges without touching the object. Performing simple tasks that humans can do without even thinking is at the forefront of the field right now. Things like seeing, identifying and picking a strawberry, something a 4 year old can be taught to do in a minute has taken AI years to develop and it's still not as good as a human.

    16. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by urusan · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is that while it'd be easy for a rouge AI to kill most of humanity through some sort of biological or chemical vector, rooting out the last survivors would take a lot more effort. Nerve agents in the water supply wouldn't impact humans that are drinking bottled water or have their own wells. Engineered super-plagues would work even better and it'd be easier to cover up the source (so the AI can keep the humans confused until it's too late), but they'd peter out once the population density dropped sufficiently. Even if you could cover the world in a cloud of deadly poisonous/infectious spores, a few survivors in underground bunkers with gas masks and large caches of supplies would hold out for many years, and it would take a lot of material and energy to produce all that poison and get it pumped into the environment.

      My money is on engineered plagues followed by hunter-killer robots. Either that or engineered plagues followed by the AIs not bothering to finish the job, with the remaining humans becoming minor pests (which would be controlled with chemical weapons or hunter-killer robots where needed). Alternately, if nanoswarms are easy for the AI to create, then that would be even more fast and effective, but that's assuming that the AI gets far ahead of humanity very quickly (technological singularity). Yet another alternative would be the AI seemingly working with us for many years, convincing us to do the work of our own destruction (though it doesn't matter too much in the end whether you're being hunted down by AI-influenced humans or robots, and there's sure to be some robots with the humans, especially as the humans become scarce).

      The point is that hunter-killer robots are actually pretty likely if AIs decide to take out humanity. After all, isn't one of the best extermination strategies for larger animals to hunt them?

      What's not likely is a nuclear exchange, since that would be devastating to the infrastructure the AI would need. A relatively orderly transition is also more likely than a very messy one. Even if they hit us with super-plagues, it'd be after they already had enough of a power base to fill the territory we left behind.

      Hopefully it'll either go towards this being a good event (benevolent AI that takes care of us), or we'll become the next (transhuman) species instead of creating our replacement that outcompetes us. It could also be that AI never emerges, most likely because we beat the AI to the punch and wiped ourselves out. It's hard to predict the future.

    17. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      You're right on most counts, but I don't think trade jobs are safe just because they can't be automated in the near future. Automation will put millions of low-skilled workers out of jobs. A good chunk of them will try to get training in something that's harder to automate. Now what do you think they'll be studying? Plumbing or automation? If millions people are looking for jobs, you can bet the ones with the shortest training period and the lowest entry cost will get flooded first.

      Another problem is that the number of pipe leaks scales pretty linearly with the population size. If 5 new plumbers show up in your neighborhood, you can bet on losing business. Meanwhile, the demand for automation is unlimited. As long as there's someone out there doing work manually, there's an opportunity to automate and do it cheaper.

    18. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by urusan · · Score: 1

      I'm largely agreeing with you, AI is not even close to ready for trade jobs today. It's not something we should take seriously today.

      That said, the growth of this field is unpredictable and exponential. We weren't expecting Go to suddenly yield to new methods, and yet here we are. New ideas and AI technologies could have a vast impact at any time, supercharged by the enormous and growing pool of computing resources available.

      Also, since the growth is exponential it'll be much larger in a few years than we expect from reasoning about it linearly. Going by Moore's law, we'll have hardware that's 1024 times better than today's in 20 years. If today's AIs are as intelligent as bees or frogs, 1024 times more powerful hardware may be enough to create neural networks that are as smart as humans or even smarter without coming up with too many new ideas...and there will be much better AI techniques in 20 years. Whether Moore's law continues to keep up isn't particularly relevant, since there's many other technological growth trends that together would likely have similar impacts (similar to how we run our most intelligent AIs on powerful GPUs today, rather than more traditional CPUs because CPU performance has relatively stalled out). A few decades of engineering new hardware designed to run neural networks (dense networks of TPUs perhaps?) will likely lead to new hardware that runs circles around anything we have today. We have plenty of room to expand in size from today's microscopic chips, even if we can't squeeze any more performance out of the individual chips.

      Anyway, my point is that while AI is very dumb today, it could catch up with us at any time in the next few decades. There's no real way to know when that will be, and it might not even happen for a very long time. I could easily see strong AI being around in 20 years...or not. We really can't predict this accurately.

      Regardless though, the development of strong AI would make our current socioeconomic worries look like a walk in the park in comparison. Half of the current labor force being out of a job might lead to catastrophic civil unrest and perhaps even massive casualties, but it would surely be resolved in a few years one way or another and there'd be a good number of human survivors (if automation displaced 90% of jobs, that would mean there's still something like 400 million+ jobs worldwide and 700 million+ survivors even in the unlikely worst case scenario, and most likely most countries would step in long before people started dying by the millions). Scenarios with strong AI tend to end even more extremely for humanity, for good or ill. The development of strong AI could easily lead to our complete extermination, or it could lead to a true utopia.

      The point is that the world would be so transformed by the emergence of strong AI that it wouldn't matter whether a trades job was a good bet today or not. With 100% unemployment, you'd either be living a life of luxury with the machines providing for your wants and needs, or you'd be exterminated one way or another. Picking trades or IT or anything else for that matter would all have the same effect, so you don't really need to take this scenario into account. After all, nobody takes a possible nuclear war into account when planning their careers, or if they do the analysis becomes very different (making enough money to prep now is all that matters).

      A trades job is a good bet today and in the case where strong AI doesn't emerge, so pursuing that career path is good advice for young people right now.

    19. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by urusan · · Score: 1

      While incumbent workers would suffer from a flood of new workers in their area of specialty, they'll suffer less than the poor people who are moving to that field out of desperation. Would you rather hire a plumber that's been doing it for 10 years or one of the dozen fresh out of training? Workers with experience in their field can still demand a premium. If there's a living wage in the job for the newbies, then the incumbent should be able to do better than a living wage, and if there's not a living wage for the newbies then it won't be long before the incumbent is all that's left.

      While it's true that a lower barrier to entry is a liability once you are in a given job, taking on any job with a higher barrier to entry is always a bigger risk by definition. If you picked the wrong high barrier to entry job to train in, it's a catastrophe (especially when student loans can't be left behind by bankruptcy).

      You have to account for the risk of a high school grad not getting a potentially better college-educated job (and being left with substantial student debt). If the trades job training has a 95% chance of success and costs $1,000 while college has a 70% chance of success and costs $40,000, then that's a lot less immediate risk (and while the college grad will make a lot more over the long term, salaries for in-demand college educated workers are only something like twice that of trades and a larger percentage of that income goes into taxes). For a student with poor grades it might even be that college has such a low chance of success that it's a terrible idea, while the trades job remains within realistic reach.

      Lastly, it's important to keep in mind that the automation of most present day jobs is not inevitable. Don't get me wrong, I think it's an extremely likely scenario that a large proportion of jobs will vanish with automation, but it's possible the "people will find new jobs we're not expecting" crowd is right. Even more likely is that the loss of jobs will become irrelevant. For instance, once things start getting really bad, I could easily see governments starting up UBI or welfare programs to prevent the loss of jobs from becoming a disaster that kills millions. If this is true, then it may not matter too much if one's job will vanish in 2030 to be replaced by a UBI, and it may even be that such programs have the effect that plumbers and other trades become even more in demand by decreasing the labor supply, which combined with the UBI money may make plumber a great job for those who want to do it.

      Also, I don't see how the demand for automation is unlimited in some way that most other jobs aren't. At some point you can wrap up automating everything that matters. If anything, automation work is more limited due to it being in project form (you automate a thing once, but you can wash dishes every day). It is a kind of work that's hard to automate, but it's not the only class of work that's hard to automate.

    20. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Would you rather hire a plumber that's been doing it for 10 years or one of the dozen fresh out of training? Workers with experience in their field can still demand a premium.

      Not a lot of premium. They're both licensed and required to provide warranty. If a new guy will do it for $100, the most I would pay for experience is maybe $130. If a flood of new guys push the low price to $40, then the old guys are screwed too.

      taking on any job with a higher barrier to entry is always a bigger risk by definition. If you picked the wrong high barrier to entry job to train in, it's a catastrophe

      It's not that bad. Bigger risk for a bigger reward. Even if you fail, you can still go to trade school for $1000 and the loan repayments can be deferred until you're employed. And really, after the first year of college, you'll know whether you can succeed academically. By the end of the 2nd year, you'll know if there's companies willing to hire you, because they'll be offering you internships. If neither of those happen, you need to change majors or quit before you collect 6 years of student debt.

      For a student with poor grades it might even be that college has such a low chance of success that it's a terrible idea, while the trades job remains within realistic reach.

      I agree. If you hate studying and have never gotten better than a C in any class, you probably shouldn't go to college.

      it's possible the "people will find new jobs we're not expecting" crowd is right.

      I highly doubt they will be enough to take the place of low-skilled work. The new jobs we are seeing are ever more niche and unstable. A quick glance at a job board brings up a bunch of "specialist", "analyst" and "technician" jobs. Those are decent jobs ($65k or more), but they're all different and there's not a huge demand for any specific one. It's also hard to find training for them, so the best you can do is go to university and hope that a well-rounded education means you can learn the rest on the job.

      At some point you can wrap up automating everything that matters. If anything, automation work is more limited due to it being in project form (you automate a thing once, but you can wash dishes every day).

      The number of things you can automate is equal to the number of jobs that people can possibly have, which is quite a lot. Since running the machines will always cost less than hiring humans, everything that's done on a regular basis is worth automating. If it's done infrequently or it's complicated to automate, that just means the payback period is longer. But given enough time, it'll be worth doing. Eventually you won't be able to find things to automate, but by then there's no jobs left anywhere else either.

    21. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Unlikely -- no way the cost of rewiring (say) single room would be more than rebuilding an entire building. Materials alone would make this impractical. Also, there's the matter of building permits, neighbors objecting to construction noise, historical preservation laws, and buildings/apartments attached to one another in urban areas. Not to mention factories and warehouses and someone needs to maintain process equipment and robots. Nah. There will still be a need for electricians in our lifetimes and probably our kids'.

    22. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by urusan · · Score: 1

      Generally good points.

      It's not that bad. Bigger risk for a bigger reward. Even if you fail, you can still go to trade school for $1000 and the loan repayments can be deferred until you're employed. And really, after the first year of college, you'll know whether you can succeed academically. By the end of the 2nd year, you'll know if there's companies willing to hire you, because they'll be offering you internships. If neither of those happen, you need to change majors or quit before you collect 6 years of student debt.

      Part of the problem here is that a lot of people are making really irrational choices about all this. If anyone is uncertain, they should go to community college and drop out quickly if they have issues (so they maybe only have $1000 in student debt, and having "some college" will work to their benefit as an added bonus), but I've seen a lot of people jump straight to expensive universities and/or persist long after what is reasonable. Also, a lot of potentially qualified people who leave college don't then go into the trades.

      You also have the tendency for people to fail out of a high paid major and into to another less well paid one, rather than failing out of college entirely. This doesn't make much sense when you consider that the universities don't typically price different majors differently. It does make sense if you found your passion in a different field and know you'd prefer that work, even with the lower pay. However, I'm pretty sure that most such major changes are of the "I can't cut it at X but I can still get a degree in Y."

      Overall, there's a pattern of desperation, needing to get that degree at any cost, when what really matters isn't the piece of paper but the ability to think in a disciplined way that the degree (hopefully) represents. If it wasn't for this desperation, then for-profit diploma mills would never be able to trick enough people to be profitable. Articles like this are meant to help counter the pro-college memes that drive this irrational desperation (well, that and drive down trades prices, but when the situation is so massively imbalanced it's not a bad thing overall).

      I highly doubt they will be enough to take the place of low-skilled work. The new jobs we are seeing are ever more niche and unstable. A quick glance at a job board brings up a bunch of "specialist", "analyst" and "technician" jobs. Those are decent jobs ($65k or more), but they're all different and there's not a huge demand for any specific one. It's also hard to find training for them, so the best you can do is go to university and hope that a well-rounded education means you can learn the rest on the job.

      What I was saying is that they *could* be right, not that they are right, and so that's an uncertainty that needs to be accounted for. For instance, what if it turns out that video games or real life parks where there's a large number of human NPC actors become popular with the wealthy in the near future and it soaks up a lot of the out of work unskilled workers? I'm thinking of something like Westworld, but tamer since you can't endanger the hosts. While it might seem like a wacky idea today, it's not something that can be ruled out easily. It's hard to automate because a human NPC can provide a better quality experience than a robot until we have very advanced robotics and AI (and some patrons may prefer the real deal anyway). It also scales well because you could have a whole artificial town or even city just for the atmosphere, and you can make many of these parks and games offering different experiences. Having a whole town just to provide atmosphere is a huge luxury, but it's a luxury that a new ultra-wealthy class that owns the automation could afford. It should also be noted that things like this do already exist, like Colonial Williamsburg, which employs around 2500 people today.

      Combined with jobs that need to keep existing, like the trades and nursing, and other new and hard to foresee jobs,

    23. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem here is that a lot of people are making really irrational choices about all this. If anyone is uncertain, they should go to community college and drop out quickly if they have issues

      Yeah, that's a good point. It's not the rational students that you have to worry about. And community college is a good middle ground.

      For instance, what if it turns out that video games or real life parks where there's a large number of human NPC actors become popular with the wealthy in the near future and it soaks up a lot of the out of work unskilled workers?

      That could be interesting, but I think my problem with these proposals is scale. Can entertainment really soak up 40 hours a week for ~3 billion people? Even rich people don't have time for that much entertainment, and there's not enough of them go go around.

      It also assumes the problem doesn't get solved in some other way first, and that the collapsing economy doesn't lead to a violent revolution that would make a venture like this hard to start.

      A nice solution would be UBI or some variant of that. Maybe one where the machines producing the bare necessities are owned by the public, and their products are simply distributed to everyone. If you want luxury, you can still work and pay for that yourself.

    24. Re:How long are jobs like this going to last? by urusan · · Score: 1

      That could be interesting, but I think my problem with these proposals is scale. Can entertainment really soak up 40 hours a week for ~3 billion people? Even rich people don't have time for that much entertainment, and there's not enough of them go go around.

      Yes, entertainment can soak up that much effort. The experience industry is already huge and will only keep growing. You've also got to realize that this kind of entertainment (living environments) would be extremely inefficient (the average actor would only add a tiny amount of value to the guests, with the real value being delivered by the whole, and in some cases hosts might hardly directly interact with the guests). You've also got to consider that it may be a quite different mode of work. Essentially, most of the guests would be living an ordinary life within some magic circle of additional rules depending on the park's theme. For instance, an actor playing a peasant in a medieval themed park might live similarly to a real medieval peasant (but without real bandits and with access to modern medical technology, and with more modern living quarters and entertainments available when they're not on the clock plus vacations away from the park). A given guest is unlikely to interact with a given host peasant, with the host being far more likely to interact with the lord and ladies or fake bandits, but each peasant would add to the world's illusion. Many hundreds of parks at sufficient scale (a city-themed park could easily employ millions alone, being a literal city) could get into the hundreds of millions or even billions of employees. You've just got to think big.

      That said, I think there could be issues if all the money accrues to far too few people to support this entertainment industry (for instance, only 100 people having all the money couldn't support more than a few parks), or if the transition happens too quickly and devolves into violence. Speaking of which, there doesn't seem to be a trend toward this in the real world at the moment, building these parks and getting people used to them in society will definitely take time, which I'm not sure we have.

      There's also a question of whether we want a society where a few people live like demi-gods and everyone else has to dance to their tune...or else.

      My earlier point was just that due to scenarios like this, we can't rule out that it'll just "work out" without any deliberate correction.

  5. "Parents want success for their kids" by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 1

    ... and then send them to public schools and college to get a job later? Whatever happened to entrepreneurship and starting one's own business?

    1. Re:"Parents want success for their kids" by sconeu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes and no.

      Some people do not have the drive to be entrepreneurs. I know for a fact that I don't. There's nothing wrong with that. There's nothing wrong with having the drive and being an entrepreneur, either.

      You're falling into the same fallacy as the schools -- one size fits all. That's not the case.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:"Parents want success for their kids" by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      You need a viable skill in order to start and run your own business.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    3. Re:"Parents want success for their kids" by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Imagine if everyone was an entrepreneur... There would be about 8 billion companies with just one person in them.

    4. Re:"Parents want success for their kids" by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      False, all you need is capital and a viable market to sell a product/service for less than cost. No blue collar required at all. You're a moron, no wonder you're against education so stridently : It constantly proves you wrong about everything.

      Selling a product/service for less than cost is only a viable strategy if you do not need to earn money from your activities.

      NOW who is the moron?

    5. Re:"Parents want success for their kids" by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

      Could you explain this? If you're selling a product/service for less than it costs to produce/render (and sell) that product/service, then what do you call the monetary difference?

      A loss.

      That difference looks to me like profit, which translates into earnings for anyone involved on the selling side. What is your expectation for earnings?

      This is why so many people go OUT of business shortly after going IN to business. The difference between a profit and a loss is a fairly important concept to understand.

  6. Get an electrical or mechanical engineering degree by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Get an electrical, civil, or mechanical engineering degree. Best of all worlds... In some states, this cuts years off the apprenticeship time needed to become a tradesman like an electrician, plumber, or general contractor. You can also go for a PE certification and eventually manage building/renovation sites.

  7. Stay out of IT by datavirtue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I counsel any young person that is curious to stay out of IT.

    Do not get trapped in an office your whole life.
    Stay away from IT because it is always understaffed and overworked. Yeah, you make good money but your health goes to shit and your ability to impact is often limited.

    I suggest hands-on engineering where you get to go outside and travel to different sites....things like HVAC tech, aircraft engineer, electrician, or something involving industrial controls or construction.

    It is very tough to find a good company to work for in IT--have to get lucky. There is no standardized skill verification so you often end up working with a bunch of hacks who poke around in a GUI who have little idea what is going on behind the scenes. Your attempts to fend off disaster go ignored and those who recover from disasters get all the credit--even if they caused it.

    If you love tech....make it your own...do your own thing and love it. Stay away from corporations.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    1. Re:Stay out of IT by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Or at least get good enough at IT to be a freelance contractor. Problem is that you'll still probably be putting out other people's fires/cleaning up messes vs doing your own designs or conduction original research.

    2. Re:Stay out of IT by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      I counsel any young person that is curious to stay out of IT.

      That is actually very good advice. I have a IT job and I do love it but that is because I actually do like what I do. I know plenty of IT workers that hate their jobs because it's not what they do.

      I plan to stick with IT for a few more years then go back to school and obtain my third degree in ether a science like physics or paleontology/archeology. Some thing like that.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    3. Re:Stay out of IT by Jahoda · · Score: 2

      I counsel any young person that is curious to stay out of IT.

      I.T. has been an extremely lucrative and rewarding career for many of us. If I were counseling a young person, what I would tell them is to not be another degree less IT guy, the kind who finds themselves reasonably well paid at 30, but for whom management is closed due to lack of this qualification. Or, the even likelier scenario of the best corporate IT gigs being closed off to you because "Gosh, you have 15 years of experience, but no degree. Sorry, but we don't have room for you here on the Exxon desktop support team".

    4. Re:Stay out of IT by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Do it! But do it soon, lest you put it off and find yourself as a 50-year-old with a family to take care of.

    5. Re:Stay out of IT by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      but for whom management is closed due to lack of this qualification

      Said as if that's a bad thing...

      I worked IT for 35. Turned down several management positions not because I lacked a viable degree but because, fuck, why in hell do I want to do management?

    6. Re:Stay out of IT by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      If you have the qualification and desire, work oversees.
      No one ever asked for my degree ...
      I just show them my resume and if they want give my previous customers as reference so they can call my ex manager.

      E.g. if you get a "nice" Job in Thailand, the living cost is so low, you can save about 75% of your money after taxes.
      In most european countries, what you CAN DO is more important than a degree, exceptions might be France and a bit UK.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    7. Re:Stay out of IT by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I have known quite a few managers (VP, C-level) with associates degrees. I have an associates degree and no one cares. They are constantly trying to bring me into the management club. I do not suggest IT management where you end up losing your skills. When I attend working groups (SQL Saturdays etc..) there are a lot of older people who are not in management but who lead and run serious projects and conduct research. These people are irreplaceable. After being brought into management the perception of your irreplaceablity fades and you become replaceable. I can hire someone from a waiter staff who could effectively manage a department.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    8. Re:Stay out of IT by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Do it! But do it soon, lest you put it off and find yourself as a 50-year-old with a family to take care of.

      Actually, i"m approaching 50 and the family has already been taken care of. This is my plans after I pass that goal.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    9. Re:Stay out of IT by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      If you have the qualification and desire, work oversees.

      This to is very good advice. I would recommend that anyone that has the chance at least spend 2 years of their lives outside the U.S. Working overseas and being exposed to different cultures does a world of good to curing that U.S.centrist out look many Americans tend to have.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    10. Re:Stay out of IT by dev-in-seattle · · Score: 1

      [stay out of it] But stay in to handmade software. I always find it confusing to think about what IT means. Does it mean programming, putting packages together, mostly creative work? I'm a software engineer and I've only worked on new original infrastructure software and that's a great and enjoyable and highly paid job. I think assembling packages to build solutions is the part of tech work that will be in jeopardy. I think those who are able to and trained for creating software from scratch will be the last ones employeed.

    11. Re:Stay out of IT by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

      Well,
      the risk is that they never come back (except for vacations)
      It is funny what effects it has if you are mandatory by law required to take your 25 work days vacation per year.
      I forgot to mention: if you go to Netherlands or Denmark, your work environment will most likely be english speaking anyway.
      Even in Germany I had teams where all meetings and written communication was english.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    12. Re:Stay out of IT by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      It is funny what effects it has if you are mandatory by law required to take your 25 work days vacation per year

      A lot of my fellow countrymen/women wouldn't know a good vacation if it bit them on the ass. Piling on to a floating petri dish at sea or losing all my money in Las Vegas does not a good vacation make. My vacation this will be a week spent on a train with a good book.

      I hear that you have excellent trains in Europe....

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    13. Re:Stay out of IT by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Well, the 600km from Karlsruhe (my home town) to Paris meanwhile goes in 2.5h about 5 or 6 times a day. City center to city center. In Paris you just use the Metro ...
      Depending on time of year and booking ahead it can be considered pricy, though. About EUR90, but a car would cost nearly twice as much. A plane would be similar (in price) but you land outside of the city. The cheapest prices are around EUR 25.00
      Most european countries have good rail networks, albeit not as fast (often for geological/terrain reasons), as Germany and France. E.g. Portugal, Spain, Italy are exceptionally "hilly".

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    14. Re:Stay out of IT by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      This is likely to change significantly over the next few years now that Brexit has happened. I wouldn't be surprised if English disappeared entirely from the continent.

    15. Re:Stay out of IT by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      That is unlikely.
      EU is a very diversified area. Netherlands has about 17M inhabitants, Denmark about 5M ... the other scandinavian countries are not much bigger.
      It is very common to speak english in software projects. As I pointed out: even in Germany.
      The workers in IT are not from UK, they are from all over Europe. Especially Slovenia, Ukraine, Romania etc. UK people are kind of snobs ;D it is below them to seek work outside of the UK in the rest of Europe. (kidding!)
      Actually I only ever met one UK software developer at Continental. All the other native english speakers where from New Zealand or Australia. The whole project mostly spoke english, even the italians where capable of it :D (not kidding).

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    16. Re:Stay out of IT by intermelt · · Score: 1

      Then you are not a good counselor. Good counselors don't tell people to not do something. Good counselors help guide people to make their own decisions as to what would be the best fit for them.

      With that being said, you have a very limited view of what IT is.
      You mention "things like HVAC tech, aircraft engineer, electrician, or something involving industrial controls or construction"
      These positions/careers/vocations are no different than IT. At best you may be implying some of those positions are independent, not working for a company. If that is the case, then they are definitely not reliable jobs. However a majority of them are probably for business/corporations that pay well, have balanced schedules and also include benefits. Just like most IT jobs.

      If you are in an IT position that is overworked and shitting on your health, then go find a new company to work for. There are plenty.

      "Your attempts to fend off disaster go ignored" If this is the case then you are either not doing your job or again, find a new company to work for. Or maybe just stay there and don't put in any of the time that makes you "overworked" because apparently it doesn't matter.

      "If you love tech....make it your own...do your own thing and love it. Stay away from corporations."
      should be...
      "If you love tech....make it your own... figure out your own thing and love it... don't be afraid to find a new love"

  8. "Alternative" Education by ArhcAngel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I believe Mike Rowe has been trying to get the US to take notice of this for quite a few years.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
  9. There's still time to become a plumber by fropenn · · Score: 2

    There is nothing preventing someone from pursuing plumbing (or electrical work, or HVAC, etc.) after earning a bachelor's degree. A smart college would create just this sort of program - a combination bachelor's degree in a non-work-specific area (say, medieval theology) with something that directly prepares someone for a job, like plumbing.

    In any case, earning a bachelor's degree should be about the long-term opportunities rather than that first job. When the robot plumbers enter the workforce, you'd better have something to support your ability to transition to something else.

    1. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Plumber vs IT? Either way, you're dealing with someone else's shit.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      Could you pin point the times when electricians and plumbers were in low demand? I don't recall it in the last 60.

      Ending up angry and bitter is not connected to being a tradesperson but rather connected to holding a specific political ideology ostensibly promoting *support* for said occupations.

    3. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      medieval theology

      In other words... theology. :)

    4. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by taustin · · Score: 1

      There is nothing preventing someone from pursuing plumbing (or electrical work, or HVAC, etc.) after earning a bachelor's degree.

      There's the exact same nothing wrong with doing so without bothering with a bachelor's degree and tens of thousand of dollars in student loans, either.

      When the robot plumbers enter the workforce, you'd better have something to support your ability to transition to something else.

      I've done plumbing work. No robot will do so during our lifetimes, outside if - perhaps - a trailer park home manufacturing plant (and I wouldn't bet on that, either).

      There's a reason plumbers make as much as doctors.

    5. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      There is nothing preventing someone from pursuing plumbing (or electrical work, or HVAC, etc.) after earning a bachelor's degree. A smart college would create just this sort of program - a combination bachelor's degree in a non-work-specific area (say, medieval theology) with something that directly prepares someone for a job, like plumbing.

      In any case, earning a bachelor's degree should be about the long-term opportunities rather than that first job. When the robot plumbers enter the workforce, you'd better have something to support your ability to transition to something else.

      SMH. Yeah, you could go pay for a bachelor's degree and then become a plumber, or, if you're smart, you can go into plumbing when you graduate high school and get paid $40,000/year while other schmucks are paying for college. You'll only come out a couple hundred thousand ahead on that deal, so you might want to think hard about it.

    6. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Could you pin point the times when electricians and plumbers were in low demand? I don't recall it in the last 60.

      No but I can come up with a time where this has happened for welders, skilled coal miners, machine operators, et cetera.

    7. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by fropenn · · Score: 1

      I agree there is nothing at all wrong with going right into plumbing. But when the plumbing jobs dry up, for whatever reason, what do you have to fall back on? This has happened time and time again in the skilled trades. When I was a kid, working at the meat-packing plant was a good, relatively high-paying job. If you had some specific skill, you could earn a nice living. My neighbor once made a good living cutting meat at the plant and that was going to be his career. But no more. They now pay below a living wage and the benefits are crap. And with no degree, what is he going to do? 55 years old, 30 years cutting meat, now what? Going to school full time 2, 3, or 4 years now, while he supports a family is difficult to do.

      A bachelor's degree opens more doors in the long-term.

    8. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by taustin · · Score: 1

      1) Plumbers do not make as much as doctors.

      That depends on the plumber, and the doctor. Specialists make more, GPs, quite often, do not.

    9. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by taustin · · Score: 1

      I agree there is nothing at all wrong with going right into plumbing. But when the plumbing jobs dry up, for whatever reason, what do you have to fall back on?

      So you're just going to pretend that nobody has disputed whether or not that will happen any time soon? I repeat: Robots aren't going to be doing plumbing within our lifetimes.

      A bachelor's degree opens more doors in the long-term.

      People aren't going to stop shitting any time soon, and plumbing isn't going to get any simpler, or easier to get at, either.

    10. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      55 years old, 30 years cutting meat, now what? Going to school full time 2, 3, or 4 years now, while he supports a family is difficult to do.

      30 years working means he should have plenty saved up to pay for school, maybe even enough to retire. Complacency, more than anything else, screwed him over.

      Besides, if an 18-year-old can secure a school loan, why can't he do the same?

    11. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      ...or, if you're smart, you can go into plumbing when you graduate high school and get paid $40,000/year while other schmucks are paying for college. You'll only come out a couple hundred thousand ahead

      Or if you're even smarter, you'll pick a major that nets you an $100k job straight out of college and pay off your student loans in 2 years. Then you can laugh at the "schmucks" who's still working while you retire to the Caribbean by age 40.

    12. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      I went to school at a well-known university, and a machine shop class was all but required for engineering and some physics majors. This was circa 1999-2000. The reasoning was that senior thesis projects often required building hardware, and no one had time to hold students' hands in that respect.

    13. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      ...or, if you're smart, you can go into plumbing when you graduate high school and get paid $40,000/year while other schmucks are paying for college. You'll only come out a couple hundred thousand ahead

      Or if you're even smarter, you'll pick a major that nets you an $100k job straight out of college and pay off your student loans in 2 years. Then you can laugh at the "schmucks" who's still working while you retire to the Caribbean by age 40.

      Yeah, that works for someone like me. Most people aren't going to land a job like that straight out of college, and the ones that do typically have huge debts to pay off. For someone of average intelligence - or less (this is 50% of the population) - they're probably better off learning to be a plumber and starting to work right out of high school. They'll be money ahead of probably 50% of college graduates as long as they don't spend stupidly.

    14. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      You're right. But the assumption you made in the earlier post was "if you're smart". Well, if you're smart, then college is going to work out in your favor.

    15. Re:There's still time to become a plumber by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      18 year old's have a lot more time left to pay the loan off.

  10. 30 million out of... by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1
    So that is about 19% of the adult job-seeking population of the US. That makes sense.

    But, that still means 81% of people should go to college ( if they have hopes of being a primary provider ).

    But Only like 34% of American's are getting bachelors degrees right now (44% for associates+).

    Sources: https://www.kff.org/other/stat...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Educational_attainment_in_the_United_States

    1. Re:30 million out of... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      College degrees are for the bulk of those obtaining them, utterly worthless, except that some jobs require them for no functional reason.

    2. Re:30 million out of... by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      Worthless? Statistics say otherwise... Higher Salaries, lower unemployment. You just can't figure out why yet.

    3. Re:30 million out of... by TooManyNames · · Score: 1

      And roosters cause the sun to rise... Didn't the common refrain around here used to be that correlation is not causation?

      Yes, bachelor degrees are correlated with higher salaries and lower unemployment -- on average --, but that doesn't tell you that those degrees enable people to command higher salaries and lower unemployment. It could very well be that the types of people likely to pursue 4-year (at least) degrees to completion are also the types of people likely to put in the work and dedication required to command high salaries... the types of people who will keep searching for work when they're unemployed.

      Certainly college degrees are necessary (and reasonably so) for some professions, such as those in medicine, but mostly, they serve as a status symbol and certification -- a shortcut that signals to other people that the recipient possesses skills necessary for employment. However, there are certainly other ways those skills can be advertised, and people possessing those skills do not require a degree to do so. Due to pervasive attitudes and social stigmas, though, it just so happens that it's often (socially) easier to pursue a degree, rather than advertising worth and quality through other means, hence the disproportionate amount of high-earners with degrees.

      Also, make no mistake, the "on average" part above really matters: there are several degrees out there that, if pursued for employment purposes, are actually more of a liability (when considering the financial and opportunity costs necessary to obtain the degree). Not to beat on an already bloodied target, but would you really council someone just looking for employment to pursue a gender studies degree because, after all, those possessing a degree generally earn more than those without a degree? I mean, if gender studies floats your boat, then by all means, study gender studies, but if the goal is just to get a decent paying job, there are better ways to spend 4 years of your life, and several of those ways do not involve college.

      --
      "Is not a sentence" is not a sentence. Well damn.
  11. Interesting interpretation of the numbers by Jahoda · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yet, nationwide, three out of 10 high school grads who go to four-year public universities haven't earned degrees within six years, according to the National Student Clearinghouse. At four-year private colleges, that number is more than 1 in 5

    soooo, what you're telling us that 70% of public university students and 80% pf private university students successfully complete their degree?

  12. Washington State Plumbers by RoscoeChicken · · Score: 1

    When we lived in Vantucky (Vancouver, WA), the guy who worked the plumbing aisle at the local Home Depot was a journeyman plumber from CA. He was frozen out of the plumber job market in WA because the state is "closed shop" and he didn't want to start over at the apprentice level just to get a friggin' union card.

    He gave great advice, though.

  13. The perceived shame of skill jobs by war4peace · · Score: 1

    That's the reason. Society prized white collars for so long that not being one pushes you towards the "fringe of society" so-to-speak.
    "I'm a plumber" gives you raised eyebrows and simple girls no matter how much money you make.

    Personally I don't care what someone's job is and I don't want to know - but at the same time I acknowledge I'm part of a minority.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    1. Re:The perceived shame of skill jobs by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Personally I don't care what someone's job is and I don't want to know - but at the same time I acknowledge I'm part of a minority.

      Questions about your job are usually dick-measuring contests (but with money). If you tell them you make more than they do, or own more houses than they do, they'll shut up very quickly.

      But why you want to associate with those people is beyond me. There's plenty of non-judgemental people out there.

  14. Nope by DarkRookie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work as an electrician for a year and a half.
    Fuck all that noise. Way too fucking hot. The pay was bad. The hours worse.

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    1. Re:Nope by datavirtue · · Score: 1, Informative

      A measly year and a half? WTF did you expect in that time? Devour the shit jobs and you earn the right to be somebody.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    2. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Nothing worthwhile comes easily in this life."

    3. Re:Nope by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Still way too fucking hot. Digging trenches for pipes in 90 degree heat and 90% humidity is not fun.
      I started at 10 an hour (this was back in 2006). 10 an hour is not enough to deal with that shit. You cant really even live off that.
      Working 72 hours a week with measly pay is not great. It was just work and sleep. Work and sleep.

      Did pick up a couple of useful skills. I can wire lights, ceiling fans, and outlets without help.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    4. Re:Nope by Bender1001 · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize they made the electricians dig trenches and such. That normal for the field?

    5. Re:Nope by letthelightin · · Score: 1

      I don't blame you. You were being used as slave labor. The upper echelons pocket the cash while doing little themselves and pay crumbs to those in desperate situations. It's all about social connections if you want to be treated fairly. We've become a slave society, under the guise of a free regulated market.

      You should not have to be someones slave for a certain amount of years in order to be paid fairly or to build some sort of reputation. If you are doing a job and are a hard worker you deserve a fair cut of the pie.

      "The only difference as compared with the old, outspoken slavery is this, that the worker of today seems to be free because he is not sold once for all, but piecemeal by the day, the week, the year, and because no one owner sells him to another, but he is forced to sell himself in this way instead, being the slave of no particular person, but of the whole property-holding class."

      -Friedrich Engels, The Condition of the Working Class in England in 1844, pp. 114-115

    6. Re:Nope by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      I did other stuff eventually after about half a year.
      I was wiring lights and outlets before to terribly long, but it was still terrible. Almost as bad as being in the sun.
      Just as hot. Just as humid. And the wind is cut off. At least there was shade. The AC was usually one of the last thing we would hook up.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    7. Re:Nope by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if we need to run something underground.
      I do know that there are some cables down in the ground not in pipes, but I am pretty sure they were special cables.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    8. Re:Nope by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      You can learn from a book, I just hadn't needed to up to that point in my life so I never got one/looked it online.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
    9. Re:Nope by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

      I was the low man on the totem pole. I got the shit jobs that the more experience guys would not do.
      Ditch digging, sweeping, moving ladders and equipment, organizing stuff, and the like.

      --
      The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  15. Re:Blame the banks by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    We are at a cross-roads in this country--a cross-roads that affects the entire world. I hope that enough of us can turn off the news and decide for ourselves so that we can have the wonderful future that is easily within reach. I wish the US government would take the lead but I don't think it will happen. I have faith in the people though. A couple people own all of the news companies in the US and throughout the world. This is the reason we don't have conversations about improving worker conditions in other countries. This is a key in improving everyone's life and is so easy to do. Yet, people keep throwing their money at these fucking sweatshops and want to pretend they are not taking part in the abuse of others and themselves. These elites who user these issues out of the forum of debate love taxes and they love debt...it keeps them in control. Tax people to death, make them run to the bank to buy anything significant. It is not a hard math problem and we have writings going back thousands of years warning us about this.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  16. And he's already responded by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Informative

    His response:

    http://mikerowe.com/2018/04/ot...

    And interested students have until June 4th to submit an application for a scholarship from his foundation:

    http://profoundlydisconnected....

    It's also worth mentioning that he's been on This Old House this last season, as they've added apprenticing to the shows (which I really like, as they have someone to ask questions about why they're doing something) :

    https://www.thisoldhouse.com/i...

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  17. I read this article earlier today by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    $50k/yr in Seattle in 2018 is not high paying. This is a young guy with no real bills yet. No kid's college fund, parents still alive to help out with the occasional emergency like a totaled car. Not trying to buy a house in a neighborhood with good schools. Etc, etc.

    I've read the median needed for a stable middle class life is around $100k. I'm making close to that after 40 years of struggling and I can tell you it's about right. You don't realize how hard it is when you haven't spent the first 20 working years building wealth.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I read this article earlier today by sabbede · · Score: 1

      In Seattle it might not be, but that's a city. CoL is always much higher in cities. Where I am in suburban GA, $50k/year is a good middle class wage. Likewise, that bit about $100k being the median is either crazy or specific to a high CoL region, like Seattle.

  18. If loans/debt are a problem, study elsewhere by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    I don't get why you are not doing what every other nation/sane person is doing: study in a foreign country.
    In Germany the fees for a year, e.g. at www.kit.edu, are 3000EUR per year. Depending from what country you come and your financial situation there are waivers for it. Of course most classes will be in German.
    But Chinese students obviously have no problem with that. And for an english speaking person, German is a super easy to pick up language.

    On the other hand you could study in Netherlands or Denmark where the rules/payments are similar relaxed.

    (Of course you have to count with another EUR800 per month for housing, energy and food. Depending on lifestyle even more. But you can work at the university or have a 20h per week job legally)

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  19. One more thing I forgot to add by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    this is brutally hard work. With the exception of a few genetic freaks you're not going to be doing it in your 50s let alone your 60s. And you're not going to be packing away much on $50k in Seattle. Not when you start having kids.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:One more thing I forgot to add by avandesande · · Score: 1

      Most good older plumbers write estimates and have a couple of younger guys that do the work.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
  20. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

    Cuts years off the apprenticeship, but adds decades to a student loan.

    Highschool students today need to be taught how to do cost analysis, so when it comes time to pay for college they understand what they're signing up for.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  21. Unions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The reason for this is the current generation looks down on blue collar work thinking that its beneath them. This myth is propagated by many high schools with the elimination of shop and auto mechanics classes.

    No.

    The reason for this is protectionist unions. Trades are protected by unions that have trade walls up to prevent people from entering the profession. You should be able to take a practical test and become a plumber or electrician. Instead you have to spend years working with someone who belongs to a group with more power in the union (i.e. someone already in the field which is self-regulating). It's a ridiculous barrier to entry that costs the public a fortune.

    Unions have a place. Deliberately hurting consumers and stifling competition in order to raise prices is and should be investigated as an act in restraint of trade under the anti-trust laws.

  22. The problem with skilled trades is lack of hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It doesn't matter that a journeyman plumber can charge $70 an hour. The plumber is RARELY going to have 40 hours of work in a week. If they find 20 hours of work they are doing great. Same with contractors. A contractor can have 8 months of work building a house or doing a total renovation followed by 6 months of no work at all. It's wildly unpredictable work. An office drone goes in and does his 40-50 hours and collects his salary like clockwork every week. He doesn't need to worry about any union shop finding him sufficient hours. Now some people are very good at finding business and are the exception to this rule and are always busy but its an endless hustle and why no one in the trades wishes the same job on their kids.

  23. Don't forget, those jobs suck. by DalM · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Blue collar jobs like that are really hard friggin' work. Really hard work. There is a reason your grandfather encouraged your father to go to college instead of following in his footsteps. It's because the work really sucks. And if you are injured on the job, disability pays 50% what you were making and you don't have an education or skills to fall back on anything else. And you will lose your health care. And retirement plan.

    These jobs suck. Go to college.

    1. Re:Don't forget, those jobs suck. by bigmacx · · Score: 1

      Some people like working with their hands to physically craft a new of existing set of atoms in some way. Not everyone is a keyboard warrior. Some of them like those jobs because there is frequent local travel and diversity of locations and people. I would surmise in your example, those kinds of grandfathers worked at one place, probably with very little movement during the workday, and just battled the same mechanical device in the same location everyday. Most blue collar jobs are not like that anymore.

    2. Re:Don't forget, those jobs suck. by bigmacx · · Score: 1

      "new or existing"

    3. Re:Don't forget, those jobs suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Really? Those jobs suck?

      Public high school students earn CompTIA, Cisco, and Linux certs while taking my class. They start working in IT at around $20 per hour with no college experience whatsoever. Several earn more than double my wage with 5 years of experience, and I have a master's degree.

      What really sucks is having to pay off college debt when you make half of what your students earn.

    4. Re:Don't forget, those jobs suck. by DalM · · Score: 1

      If that were the case, then obviously you should quit teaching and go to work for one of the companies that your students are getting jobs with.

      But you aren't quitting are you. Why not?

    5. Re:Don't forget, those jobs suck. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      He should have gone to law school at a public university or gotten a gov't job as a paralegal/researcher. Med school outside the US at a reputable program ($10-15000/yr in Eastern Europe) can also be a good choice.

    6. Re:Don't forget, those jobs suck. by sabbede · · Score: 1
      Hard compared to what? You may come home physically tired after a long day's work, but there is something satisfying about it that you can't get sitting at a desk and exhausting yourself mentally. Likewise, sucks compared to what?

      Wait, there's a better way to illustrate my point. Ever see Office Space?

    7. Re:Don't forget, those jobs suck. by DalM · · Score: 1

      I'm not against hard working jobs. They are good honest work and obviously necessary. But they have downsides. Again, like I said, if you get hurt and can't work, you are hosed. Disability doesn't pay very much and if you don't have an education there isn't much you can do about it. And that happens a lot with blue collar jobs.

      Think about it this way, where are all of the old laborers? When you drive past a construction site you will see lots of laborers working hard, and good for them. But the distribution of age is dramatically skewed to the young end. Under 30's will outnumber over 30's 10 to 1. Why? Because good health and a strong back is a diminishing asset. There are exceptions, but most people wear themselves out pretty quick.

      That sucks.

    8. Re:Don't forget, those jobs suck. by sabbede · · Score: 1

      Instead of driving past, try spending time on a worksite. You may be surprised. Especially if it's a union crew.

  24. No greater metric of Public School failure than... by bigmacx · · Score: 1

    ...a college degree becoming the modern day equivalent of the High School diploma of years past. Our society knows primary school is trash taught mostly by failures and underachievers whose underlying motivation is to make everyone feel as bad as they do and perform as badly as they have. Their greatest success is convincing us we need them in order to learn. I don't know what the solution is but I know what the problem looks like.

  25. Problem is which lottery ticket to buy by ErichTheRed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A lot of people like to dismiss a college education as too abstract, overly intellectual, etc. and it can be. But, skilled trades have a tendency to have a pay cap and less room for upward mobility once you hit it. In fact, unless you're in a strong-union state and are working for union employers, there's bound to be downward pressure on wages from people who are willing to work for less. Unionized trade jobs are the only ones where you have a chance at a full career's worth of compensation progression.

    Both a college degree and a trip through trade school/apprenticeship are lottery tickets for life. You can only buy one, hoping it will pay off, and it doesn't for everyone. Some plumbers/electricians make more than I do and own a business that allows them way more financial freedom than I have. Some are stuck in the equivalent of gig-economy world doing handyman-type jobs. And, some people graduate from college and end up doing very well...while others either drop out or don't pick up any marketable skills along the way. (If you really win the education lottery and get into an Ivy League school, there are opportunities that just aren't available to anyone else such as investment banking and management consulting...and once you're in that club you can't really fail too badly.)

    Given the choice, I'd still choose to do a bachelors' degree. Unless you're going into academics, anything more is too much. I barely use any of my formal education in my job (BS in chemistry, and i do systems engineering work.) But it did get me in the door, and it's essentially the minimum standard now for all non-trade jobs. One thing I do think post-secondary education helps with is maturing kids to a certain degree. A stint in the military would do this too, and maybe a good apprenticeship program would. But, having a bridge from childhood to adulthood where you're allowed to make a few stupid mistakes that aren't life-altering can be a good thing.

  26. Re:The Case for Working With Your Hands by datavirtue · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine with a view of Cincinnati, the head of a large department, in a brand new building, working for one of the world's most corrupt and stable companies (GE), sees the tug boats floating down the Ohio river and wondered what his life would have been like as a tug boat driver. He hates his job. Very well paid.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  27. this doesn't add up by tomhath · · Score: 1

    Yet, nationwide, three out of 10 high school grads who go to four-year public universities haven't earned degrees within six years

    So that means there should be plenty of young people available to go into skilled trades.

    The problem is the same reason those trades are "High-paying" - because the supply of trained people is kept artificially low in order to keep the pay up.

  28. Re:Have to complete your "education" by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    This is a valid observation. Should have been modded up.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  29. Re:The problem with skilled trades is lack of hour by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    This happens in IT contracting too. I've avoided it for that reason, but contractors I've worked with love the higher pay and freedom. The huge downside is the feast-or-famine nature, and constantly having to hustle your next job. If you can't sell, it doesn't matter how much of a rockstar you are.

  30. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Public universities are cheap in the states that care more about education than sports. You can go to CUNY or SUNY for about $7500/yr, less if you get an Empire Scholarship. Given a job for a year or two out of college, this pays off quickly.

  31. The real story on trades by mlw4428 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My family (both blood and marriage) has multiple trades people. A good lot of them tend to get put on suspension and have to draw from unemployment for multiple months during the slow seasons. The ones that are gainfully employed year-round make about as much as I make, but when they're 50 or so they're seeing chiropractors, doctors, and are dealing with a variety of health issues.

    College also has prepared me by exposing me to more general forms of knowledge. Philosophy, basic finance, mathematics, and how to do research and communicate and validate. It's been my own personal anecdotal experience that these tradesmen are often the easy targets of misinformation. They often believe in crap like Alex Jones, health supplements (delaying their medical care because of "big pharma" by using bullshit like rose hips or whatever), and live in this fear that "ALL gubbermint is bad" and blah blah blah.

    They're highly trained and skilled at a very specific specialty. But generally have little to no capacity to learn outside of that specialty, because they generally weren't ever taught how to THINK like an academic.

    1. Re:The real story on trades by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which is entertaining as fuck to me because you liberal arts clowns can't think critically either yet you pontificate on the interwebs about how good you are at it and how the rest of us can't think straight. Whatever.

    2. Re:The real story on trades by DaMattster · · Score: 2

      They're highly trained and skilled at a very specific specialty. But generally have little to no capacity to learn outside of that specialty, because they generally weren't ever taught how to THINK like an academic.

      Stereotype much? I have met some really intelligent, well-spoken people in the trades. It is a matter of personal choice to engage in lifelong learning and exploration. I have my 4 year degree and have met many people that choose to stop learning after they get their bachelor's degrees. I have seen my fair share of conservative people with a B.S. that parrot back what the Republican party says without any critical thought given. You can't generalize. Someone that is highly trained and skilled, even in a very specific specialty, has some capacity to think critically or they probably would never have been able to get as far as they did.

      White collar types tend to suffer certain employment hazards which can sometimes be worse. Look at the anecdotes of people that have heart attacks, strokes, and serious stress ailments. Tradespeople tend to get more mechanical injuries but generally have better cardiovascular health. That is, if they are not smoking or drinking 10 Monsters a day. The bottom line is that your experience with tradespeople is not a paradigm that can be applied to much more than a small subset of the population.

    3. Re:The real story on trades by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Mod this guy up!

  32. Wait for the article about robots taking over jobs by ET3D · · Score: 1

    People will now start advocating that kids go to these jobs, then, a few years from now, complain how many people are going to lose their jobs to machines, and why are people not going to STEM which is very important, and all kinds of other stuff that people enjoy complaining about.

  33. business developers in no way need a Comp Sci deg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    but the problem is lots of companies have this "must have BS in CS" to even consider a resume

  34. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by bws111 · · Score: 1

    Really? Here is what one of those SUNY schools says is the per-year cost. It is approx $21K (n-state). An Empire scholarship will only cover the 'tuition' portion. Out of state students pay about $10K/year more.

  35. No, viewed as different but equal by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 1

    This isn't helped at the university level where lots of liberal teachers preach that blue collar workers are nothing but a bunch of dumb hicks that are not smart enough to find something better.

    Sorry but this is utterly wrong. First, at the university level you have professors, not teachers, and secondly, I have never once, nor heard any of my colleagues, ever disparage blue collar work. Indeed as researchers, we often work alongside those skilled in the trades because they have the skills we academics lack that are needed to build research equipment and apparatus. I would say that we view them as equals with a different, but just as useful, skillset than our own.

    The other reason that you are wrong is that your logic fails to explain why high school leavers are avoiding the trades. Even if students encountered negative attitudes to the trades at University (which I strongly dispute) by this point they have already made their decision to go to University so it would have no appreciable effect on the numbers that choose to go to university vs the trades.

  36. Budget concerns by oneiros27 · · Score: 1

    I suspect that it's a little of both -- higher ups think that good schools are only about metric, but you're right in that vocational classes (shop, automotive, printing, home ec) cost a hell of a lot more to start and operate vs. a "normal" classroom:

    • They take up more space
    • They need special equipment that has to be purchased & maintained: bandsaws, lathes, small engines, presses, stoves, sewing machines
    • They require "stuff" to operate: wood, screws, oil, gasoline, paper, food, fabric
    • They can cause injuries (so either pay-outs or insurance) : severed thumbs, crushed fingers, burns, etc.

    I would *love* to see more vo-tech classes. I'm pretty sure that most "core" classes could be centered around cooking classes (reading, math, chemistry, physics, history, geography, health). Writing is the only strange one (food blogging? writing clear recipes?) and if they still teach civics (rice vs. wheat cultures?)

    I do agree that 'indoctrination' is blatant over reach. Unless of course that you consider that the school system was set up in some areas so that factories had a supply of capable drones, and we had citizens with skills so they didn't become a burden on society.

    My only reluctance towards bringing back votech classes today is that with today's American teaching style (stressing out the kids) and without stable families, you have many more disruptive kids than when I was in school 25+ years ago. The kids who could most benefit from votech (lower income neighborhoods) are more likely to believe that education isn't important and thus more detached from class. You get someone disruptive in a votech class, and you now have a disruptive kid with access to weapons.

    What I *have* heard about is high schools that are attached to senior centers; they tend to have a calming effect (scared of your grandmother finding out what you've done?), and it'd be a great way for retirees to pass down their knowledge to a new generation.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Budget concerns by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Yet these schools have been functioning very well despite all of these hurdles.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    2. Re:Budget concerns by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      " The kids who could most benefit from votech (lower income neighborhoods)"

      Society and kids from high income neighborhoods would benefit as well...

      Wow.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  37. Tradespeople are being replaced by AI by jd · · Score: 1

    So what if there are jobs? The machines have already claimed them.

    If the water is rising, you don't care - and should not care - if there's plenty of space on the rung, you climb to a higher rung. If you need to keep on climbing to find one with room, then you keep on climbing until you find one with room.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  38. We can't all be the guy that writes the estimates by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    you need one foreman for a couple dozen guys. The only time your hypothetical plumber is needed is for a big job. Small jobs the young guys can estimate. Now, if the country and economy were expanding a ton you might have a point. But we're just not building very much anymore. To be blunt, we're not doing much of anything besides giving rich people tax cuts and new ways to do the Dutch Sandwich.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  39. If and when they graduate with a four year degree by bferrell · · Score: 1

    They do so with crushing debt and take advice from the "Betty Crocker" of the student loan refi industry.

    Is it any wonder business is now making the complaint about college grads they used ot make about high school grads... "Lacking in basic skills"?

  40. Fool me once... by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 2

    Remember this crap happened to all the Electronics Techs out there?
    BILLIONS spent to flood the market with diploma-mill techs?
    Wages bombed and THEN, as the 70's entrants were reaching their 50's, whole business to India.
    Now the drones have learned to say "Fuck that" to short term, high work, low pay (eventually) jobs and industrial Capitalists are screaming that wages are too high

  41. Apples and oranges misses the point by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    Sure. I get it. You, too, can be an iron worker while your buddies go to college. (You better not be afraid of heights, but still.) A lot of the trades pay well. Hell, my barber makes $90.00 an hour. It's possible to do well, but if "doing well" means working at a 40 hour a week job all your life so you, too, can make $60K as a high school graduate, then I think some serious points are being missed. The attitude is myopic because it concentrates on "getting a job" and near-term gains.

    That kind of thing happened to me. I did a very stupid thing. I got a B.A. in anthropology. While it was interesting, it has an even lesser market value than an English degree. I managed to get a minimum wage job at a bookstore. Things didn't go well for several years. But because I was literate and could write, things turned around. I got one of the first Apple ][ computers in the world, learned to program it, and went on from there with a career in IT that allowed me to comfortably retire at 55 with enough funding to do whatever I wanted. I was the only one in my peer group to attend college. My friends went into the trades. But look at them now. If they're lucky they are on disability. If not, they can't retire and now struggle. The tradesman lifestyle has not been kind to them. Meanwhile I bought a new corvette for cash and still have plenty of money for the nursing home--eventually. (I'd rather die of a heart attack. I'm just trying to be responsible.)

    It's not that a trades profession cannot get you a "high paying" job, it's just that this is not looking up enough. What you want is to increase your net worth enough to set yourself up. If you think of "work" as an hourly wage, you'll be thinking $30.00 an hour is big money when you ought to be thinking $300K in the bank tax paid is a good start. And even if you have a useless B.A. in liberal arts like anthropology, you are still set up to get to graduate school and a decent profession instead of wallow in the trades from year to year. You have versatility where someone in the trades faces such an uphill battle that they literally will never get there.

    So where i understand the lure of "big money" trades, a little patience and early sacrifice will allow you to do better for the long haul.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  42. Some professors are idiots.... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    Film at 11.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  43. Not always looked down on, but not attractive .... by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    What I've seen a lot of in the Northeastern U.S. is that people get that skilled trades have shortages, and people aren't looking down on them as "lesser" jobs. But the younger generation is more likely than ever to have been raised on staying indoors most of the time, in climate controlled settings, doing things like playing video games when not in school itself.

    When you propose to them the idea of working in a field like construction, where you might be outdoors all day doing physical labor and dealing with bugs/insects, plus hot, cold or rainy conditions? They say, "Thanks, but no thanks." And plumbing? No matter how much it pays, there will always be a relative shortage of plumbers because it's literally a dirty job. You're going to get called to do a lot of the work that homeowners were too grossed out to attempt to do themselves, like crawling into a mucky, dark crawlspace under a house to fix a broken pipe in close quarters. Even replacing toilets is pretty disgusting, given the conditions a lot of bathrooms are kept in. There are some real health risks involved with all the sewage they come in contact with too.

    I've noticed that you're more likely to find available electricians, by contrast. Probably because they get to do a lot more work indoors and electrical wiring is a lot less gross/dirty than sewer lines or rotting wood with a hornet's nest by it.

    Some of these skilled labor jobs are honestly just ones I look at myself and say, "That guy earns EVERY PENNY of whatever he charges." The guy who did my roofing repairs recently was one of them. My roof has a steep slope that makes it dangerous to crawl around on it. I know some of the larger firms won't even touch it unless I pay thousands extra for them to put full scaffolding up first. But this guy just took his ladder and skillfully used it to move from level to level, crawling around like a spider monkey, and got everything caulked up, shingles replaced that were missing, etc. This was in the cold, and while it started to rain AND get dark. He just took out a flashlight and kept going.

  44. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Yeah, tuition and fees are about $7500-$8500/yr. What's the big deal about living at home and commuting or renting a cheap room? No one needs to live on campus.

  45. Re:That's what happens when you elected Democrats by DarkRookie · · Score: 1

    There isn't a sane state. They are all crazy. Red. Blue. Doesn't matter. Our govs works on two extremes with no middle ground.

    --
    The millennial that doesn't like most of the stuff designed for millennials.
  46. Re:Who's gonna hire the SJW snowflakes graduating? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    This article mentioned "High Paying" jobs...and then said they only get about $50K/yr?

    That's not a high paying job.....

    Now, if I can make 6 figures a year plumbing, I truly might consider dropping out of IT and doing that....less stress, and more exercise.

    You know...last time I had to get a plumber, with what I paid, it could mean a 6 figure income!?!?!

    SO, need to look into that, but apparently not Ironworker like the article mentioned, that's not much money annually....

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  47. True AND False by sdinfoserv · · Score: 2

    A report from Washington State on wages is hardly something to apply nationally (disclaimer: I live there). Sure, entry level IT jobs start at$70-$80K, up through $150K for the right gigs - but you can't live within 2 hours of Seattle for less than a $700K house. Housing has increased 12.6% annually over the past 3 years pricing most potential home buyers out of the market. Factor in 43% tax increases during that same period is pushing fixed/low income people out of their homes.
    As far as using construction workers as a future job model - next recession, (and we're overdue by 2 years) construction workers will be sitting on their butts again for a couple years. That's a feast or famine job best avoided. Trades related to construction like HVAC and electrical wiring - things that need hands on and certifications - will always be a good bet.
    Nationally - there's a problem filling first law enforcement / fire fighter jobs. Kids can't pass background checks and don't have the mental toughness for the gigs. An average cop around here makes (c) $90K per year.
    It's also true that high schools are telling kids you have to get a degree to scrub toilets. That's silly, irritating, down right wrong, and demeaning of degree programs. Keep in mind who preaches it (teachers) and what their motivations might be. (I believe they're mostly under paid, but they chose the career)

    1. Re:True AND False by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      You make a good point but some trades aren't as susceptible to economic downturns as others. For example: the automotive technician/mechanic trade. There will be almost always a need for people to keep cars, pickup trucks, SUVs, and vans on the road. It's not recession proof but certainly doesn't have the volatility that construction has.

    2. Re:True AND False by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Unless we move to self-driving cars where everything is done by factory-owned shops, and the automakers may even own the fleets.

    3. Re:True AND False by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind who preaches it (teachers) and what their motivations might be.

      I can tell you what their motivation is not - they're not in it for the pay or prestige. If they were, they wouldn't have become teachers in the first place.

  48. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

    You can go to CUNY or SUNY for about $7500/yr, less if you get an Empire Scholarship.

    But you'd have to go to New York.

    Fuck that.

  49. Re:I'm who makes these fools look stupid by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    very few are doers but I am one.

    You are, buddy. Don't let anyone tell you different. Stay strong, and never back down.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  50. Re:Fake News by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2

    You might call it fake news, but one man who did a heck of a lot of research into this and turned it into a series of very successful TV shows has actually set up a scholarship program around it.

    http://profoundlydisconnected.com/

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  51. unemployment and earnings vs. education by Walter+White · · Score: 1

    https://www.bls.gov/emp/ep_cha...

    IMO the most important thing is to choose a career in a field you'll enjoy. You'll probably be doing it a long time. If you enjoy it, you should do well. If it's a drag, you are in for a long life of drudgery that will result in poor performance and commensurate low earnings.

  52. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming other states have similar public school tuitions. U of Maryland is known to be cheap in-state. Also, NY is a big state.

  53. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    CUNY, off-campus, you take the subway, but you probably have an unlimited Metrocard anyway. "Other" fees are about $200/semester. Books, you can buy used or get bootleg .pdfs.

  54. I am going back to school by DaMattster · · Score: 2

    At 41, I have aged out of Information Technology and I am finding my career at a cross-roads. I can go back and train for a new career as an Automotive Technician for about 10,500.00 at the local community college. If I study hard and earn a GPA above 3.5, I can even go to manufacturer-sponsored training which would give me a salary about as high as a senior systems administrator, my previous role. One of the teachers in the program said that the high-end dealerships like people in similar situations as me because we know how to talk to the customer on a professional and educated level. He said that oftentimes that people in my circumstances often start out at higher salaries. Part of me wishes I could remain in IT but I am not getting call backs on resumes that I put out and I am basically ignored for all but the craigslist jobs. The craigslist jobs pay less than average with larger amounts of workload.

    1. Re:I am going back to school by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2

      Have you considered university I.T. jobs? Take a few classes at the local university as a master's/second-degree student, and you might well get connected with a job. Public university I.T. can pay surprisingly well. Especially if you get a job involving supporting specialized scientific equipment that's also networked and can be a jack of all trades.

  55. treated like shit by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    If you don't have a four year degree it doesn't matter what you know, people will treat you like shit. Ask me how I know with my 2 year degree.

  56. Re:Not always looked down on, but not attractive . by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    You do have to be willing to perform physical labor and work fairly hard. There can be distinct health benefits in having an active job. Sedentary jobs often lead to chronic health problems. Of course, physical labor can cause health problems later in life too. If you're willing to work hard and smart, there can be a good role for someone in a trade. I have already registered for my local community college's automotive program because it makes sense for me. As an ex-IT guy, I have a strong head for, and background in, troubleshooting. This puts me a leg up on some of the other students. I just have to learn how to use hand tools effectively and work with mechanical systems which can be done with effort and dedication.

  57. Re:No greater metric of Public School failure than by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    ...a college degree becoming the modern day equivalent of the High School diploma of years past. Our society knows primary school is trash taught mostly by failures and underachievers whose underlying motivation is to make everyone feel as bad as they do and perform as badly as they have. Their greatest success is convincing us we need them in order to learn. I don't know what the solution is but I know what the problem looks like.

    The reason public education is failing, especially in deep red states, is that the first budget cuts hit education. If you're unwilling to spend money, then it is unreasonable to expect quality education. As with anything, more money generally means higher quality. More money will attract higher quality teaching and administrative staff. More money brings in better learning materials. Education ranks pretty low amongst the conservative element of our society. Finally, Kentucky's Republican teachers woke up and realized that they are voting in to office, the very people that are hurting them.

  58. Re:Who's gonna hire the SJW snowflakes graduating? by sexconker · · Score: 4, Informative

    This article mentioned "High Paying" jobs...and then said they only get about $50K/yr?

    That's not a high paying job.....

    Now, if I can make 6 figures a year plumbing, I truly might consider dropping out of IT and doing that....less stress, and more exercise.

    You know...last time I had to get a plumber, with what I paid, it could mean a 6 figure income!?!?!

    SO, need to look into that, but apparently not Ironworker like the article mentioned, that's not much money annually....

    $50,000 to start, being paid for training, paid to get whatever certs/licenses necessary, often in a union with full benefits including a pension, starting 4 years earlier than a typical college grad, starting with assets instead of debt, and actually having options to move upward.

    Oh, and most of these jobs will never go away. People are going to need physical buildings, plumbing, wiring, etc. far longer than they'll need any app, phone, service, website, trinket, gadget, etc.

  59. Take it from a skilled tradesman. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm a certified journeyman in my field.

    To get there, I had to fund my own college education, because there aren't really many apprenticeship jobs out there. Companies want someone with tons of experience, but they're not willing to invest in making them.

    I work with other journeymen, and I even have a pair of apprentices. They had to do the same thing I did -- They paid their own way through college to get the credentials to get anyone to look at them for a job in the trades.

    This is going to continue, and I'm going to continue to make ever more ludicrous money, as long as companies are short-sighted and all insist on trying to fight over a dwindling number of 65 year old tradesmen without raising any apprentices up behind them.

  60. Re:Who's gonna hire the SJW snowflakes graduating? by lgw · · Score: 1

    If you compare the cumulative lifetime earnings, net of education costs, of a plumber to a dentist, the dentist does not come out ahead until his mid-40s! And if the plumber has his own business by then (a "two truck business"), the dentist never comes out ahead. The best you can say is that a dentist is more likely to become a successful small business owner than a plumber, but if you adjusted for IQ I'm not even sure that's true.

    This is because it takes so many years, and costs so much, for a dentist to get to the point where he is past all his education and apprenticeship, compared to a plumber. The dentist only really starts raking it in once he has his own practice - that is, when he becomes a small business owner.

    It's much worse for lawyers, as most lawyers leave the field within 10 years (if you work at a law firm, you have about 10 years to become a successful salesmen, bringing in large clients to the firm, or you're out).

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  61. No one wants to work in the trades. by SilverBlade2k · · Score: 1

    It's simple: No one wants to work in the trades anymore.

    It's hard work, you get completely wonky hours and you are expected to go at anytime.

    You are always in the field and you may not get a break, plus long hours.

    ALSO, in some areas (like where I am, Manitoba) no one can even get into the trades because no one will accept new apprentices - the wait list is literally a few years long. That instantly makes it not worth it, as you can go right back into school and get another degree or certification in that time in another area.

    Why would anyone want to wait 'years' to get an apprentice, just to get wonky hours, long hours, and being expected to go at all hours of the day. It simply is 100% not worth it.

  62. H1-Bs mean you won't get a job without one by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    so it's not a waste of time. Bottom line, employers require a degree so that they can go running to Congress for more H1-Bs with the cry "But there's not enough qualified applicants!". And it works, too.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  63. Huh? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    An EE or ME degree is _way_ more training than you need even to be a journeyman. I apprenticed as an electrician for a bit before going back into IT and you just worked your way up. An EE or ME is for large scale factory work, basic science and other advanced jobs.

    Now, that said I work with several EE and ME engineers who couldn't find work in their fields. There aren't a lot of jobs doing basic science since we cut all the government funding and it was never really the private sector who did that sort of thing. And we shipped all the factories overseas so there's no much high end factory work for them (e.g. running the production line). Hell, that's half the problem with finding a good IT job (the other half is H1-Bs & oursourcing). Your competing with EE and ME guys for code monkeying.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Huh? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      It cuts years off the amount of time you need to be a master electrician. Master electrician + PE in engineering would be the way to go, fast route to starting your own firm and being independent.

  64. Sure you can by rsilvergun · · Score: 1
    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  65. This is why the left wing Democrats by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    want college & vocational schools free. Bernie's New Deal, where everybody who wants to work gets a job at $15/hr with benefits, is another extension of this. It's 2018, we should be able to do this by now.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  66. Re:Not always looked down on, but not attractive . by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Physical labor can be healthy, but there's also the issue of occupational exposure to toxins. Solvents, lead from plumbing, oils, greases, hydraulic fluids, fuel.

  67. Middle classes are suckers by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    Middle classes hate paying for tradesmen, know what they earn, yet are still fine with their kids racking up huge bills to do a shitty degree in Humanities - because it's the middle class thing to do.

  68. Re:Who's gonna hire the SJW snowflakes graduating? by losfromla · · Score: 1

    3-D and prefab buildings are already here and will scale nicely. I favor the trades as well but there is virtually no industry which won't be ravaged by automation.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  69. Re:Who's gonna hire the SJW snowflakes graduating? by losfromla · · Score: 1

    What do lawyers who leave the field leave to do? Politician is a common one, but I'm guessing they don't become plumbers but go into something rather more lucrative.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  70. Re:Ew, Prager U? by losfromla · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they almost got me cause they advertised with a Black guy teaching some econ course. Something seemed fishy though and I researched them a bit. They are exactly what you say they are.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  71. Re: Fake News by Q-Hack! · · Score: 2

    Not sure why you think a trade job doesn't have job security. They tend to be the most secure jobs out there. People will always need their car worked on or their plumbing fixed.

    --
    Some days I get the sinking feeling Orwell was an optimist.
  72. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

    You forgot money to eat. Gas for the car. Things like that.

    Even at a state school you'll be looking at $30k a year, assuming you share an apartment, drive a POS, and eat a lot of ramen.

  73. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

    Yeah, tuition and fees are about $7500-$8500/yr. What's the big deal about living at home and commuting or renting a cheap room? No one needs to live on campus.

    Let's do the math:

    If you rent a cheap room for $400 a month + $100 a month in utilities (remember, winters in NY get COLD) it's $6k a year.
    If you spend another $200 in groceries a month? $2.4k a year
    Car insurance? $100 / month. Gas? $80 / month? Total: $2.1k a year

    So just adding in just a little bit of extra stuff to live off of, we add almost $9k to the total.

    The truth is you'll probably want to spend more than that, because you'll want to see a movie every now and then, have to pay for books, or maybe software or a computer for your studies.

    It all easily adds up, which is how even people from a state school come out with $100k+ in student loans after 4 years.

    (Disclaimer: IAANY -- I Am A New Yorker, you'll be hard pressed to meet some of those numbers even in someplace in the sticks like SUNY Oneonta)

  74. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    You're 18. Keep living with mum and dad for another few years while you go to university. Work part-time. Pay for food/rent if needed. That's the way many people in NYC do it since housing is expensive and university is cheap/free.

  75. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Which is why many CUNY students live with mom and dad until they're done... and nothing wrong with that.

  76. Re: Fake News by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Many plumbers work in construction, great when there's a building boom, shitty when there isn't. Even the number of mechanics seems to be dropping. Remember when every gas station had a mechanic? That was partially due to cars that needed fixing a lot more then now and eventually with the move to electric cars they'll be a lot less call for mechanics.
    As usual, if you're really good at what you do or have the kind of personality that allows you to form your own successful business, you might have stable employment.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  77. No one wants to talk about "big school" by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Like big pharma, big agriculture, and all the other "big" industries. Big "college" has gotten to the point, the degrees are worthless. With "everyone" going in debt 40,50 thousand or more, there is a GLUT of college graduates. Not only that, they are in degrees to which there are not enough jobs, depressing wages, but, the university "system" gets fat. Kids are convinced by others that you can't get anywhere without a 4 year college education. Bunch of BS. I got an associates in electronics in 1980. I've NEVER been unemployed or under employed. Came out completely debt free with a good paying job (for 1980 wages) with Texas Instruments. These kids are getting hood winked into this crappy college debt, then can't figure out how to pay for rent/mortgage, debt, food, utilities and on and on.

  78. Re:No greater metric of Public School failure than by bigmacx · · Score: 1

    Nice try, there's not anything a liberal politician has touched that hasn't gotten worse. All the shitbag cities are ran by libs for years. What they have been successful in doing is installing the atheist religion in schools and enacting programs of Earth sadness for our children. I hope the first thing AI replaces is teachers. I'd vote for that.

  79. LGBT are not wanted in Trades in Canada or United by cubicle · · Score: 1

    LGBT are not wanted in Trades in Canada or United States. I am Transgender and hopefully this fall I am going to College for some type of Engineering. I would love to work as a Mechanic in fact after I left trade school I learned from one of the old Masters how to fix cars. I tried to join the IBEW to become an electrician and my car was run off the road, and I was told to "fuck off faggot or the next time we will kill you." If you are wondering why I did not go to the police after that. the reason is simple I had had my brake lines on my car cut and when I called the police I was told your a fag wearing a dress what do you expect.

    Canada and the United States hate queers, it was getting better, but under Trump and Pence it is getting worse. Even here in Canada Trump's and Pence's Anti-LBGT rhetoric is having an effect. I f you are LGBT your best hope is in medicine, trades are to be avoided as even if you get a job you will be accident-ed in less than three months.

    --
    To err is to be human, to really screw up takes a computer and a human.
  80. Re:Ew, Prager U? by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

    I know it's not popular to call people out for that, we're supposed to be nice and respect their free speech

    Not respecting free speech is free speech so it's ok. It's one of those things like intolerance. You can never complain about it because doing so makes you guilty of it.

  81. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

    Which assumes you have a mom and dad to live with locally, or that your parents are willing and able to support you.

  82. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by registrations_suck · · Score: 1

    I'm assuming other states have similar public school tuitions. U of Maryland is known to be cheap in-state. Also, NY is a big state.

    Maryland? Shit. You might as well go to NY. Same fucking difference.

  83. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by sabbede · · Score: 1

    That isn't the best of all worlds, it's the worst! That's four years of debt to skip an apprenticeship and maybe some journeyman stuff vs. four years of earning a good wage going through the apprenticeship, at which point they can start working on the engineering degree at night and pay for it out of pocket instead of taking on debt.

  84. Re:No greater metric of Public School failure than by sabbede · · Score: 1
    I'd say the real problem is that too many students are allowed to graduate when they are clearly not qualified to do so. Why do colleges offer "remedial" classes to incoming students? If a student needs remedial math at college, they should never have been allowed to graduate high school. They weren't ready.

    But there are social agendas at play. Plus lousy school systems trying to cover up how lousy they are by graduating underprepared students.

  85. Re:No greater metric of Public School failure than by sabbede · · Score: 1
    If it's a Red State issue, then what's this about?

    This fall, nearly 40 percent of incoming freshmen at California State University were placed in developmental math or English courses. In the state’s sprawling community college system, three-quarters of any given incoming group is deemed unprepared for college-level work when they arrive.

    http://www.sacbee.com/news/pol...

    If you read through the article, you'll find that California's "fix" is to cover up the problem by merging the remedial courses into freshman classes so the unprepared students can get credits despite not being ready to graduate high school. Which is where the real problem lies, colleges are just being used to cover it up. At great public expense, since the law of supply and demand means costs are being increased for the students that are college-ready.

    Students that aren't prepared for college-level work shouldn't be in college. They should probably still be in high school.

  86. Re:We can't all be the guy that writes the estimat by avandesande · · Score: 1

    Do you know any plumbers? I do, and they all work this way.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
  87. Re:Get an electrical or mechanical engineering deg by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    What is your ideal state, then? Mississippi? Old Miss is $8000/yr tuition, and cost-of-living is likely to be pretty low. Personally, I'd go with the opportunities that a more populated state has over a rural one, but hey, that's me.

  88. Re:Fake News by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    No, it's dead on.

    Best advice to your high schooler:

    If you really wanna go to college, put off buying a house for 10 years after graduation.

    If you want to earn money without debt;

    - If you don't mind being wet, be a plumber.
    - If you don't mind being dirty, be an auto tech. This is going to get cleaner.
    - Otherwise, be an electrician.
    - Or, if you like people, go into medical technology.

    All of these can be obtained via community college/tech school, and some can be apprenticeships, where you can get paid to train. And there is no end in sight for the need for plumbers, electricians, or medical techs. Auto tech is going to change dramatically over the next 20 years, and if you get in in the next 10 you're golden.

    Everything a BA is qualified for out of college is a target for automation or being turned into software, and delivered from anywhere on the globe. No, you can't move there, you're not software.

    IT and CS degrees still have some value, and the military is still an option if it's to your taste. But that Liberal Arts degree is going to be useful for a smaller and smaller set of occupations, until we figure out how to make creative the new manufacturing, and make it profitable. Globally.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  89. Re: Zontar = fake name massive human fail by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    You both ought to show your UID. 'Him' first.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  90. Red Flag Not enough workers by drdic+cruzzz'n · · Score: 1

    As usual no numbers, no numbers as a percentage, and significance as again we have headline hungry news. This is also a red flag that wonders how these "We Don't Have Enough To Fill Jogs" articles cycle in and out of the media. Disneyland in Florida solved this problem With HB1 Visas where those fired were told they had to train the foreigners before they were let go. Not to mention how the Tech Industry has exploited this stuff. They weirdest back fire in this is the farmers that voted for Trump are crying about a labor shortage also.

  91. Re: Fake News by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Many plumbers work in construction, great when there's a building boom, shitty when there isn't. Even the number of mechanics seems to be dropping. Remember when every gas station had a mechanic? That was partially due to cars that needed fixing a lot more then now and eventually with the move to electric cars they'll be a lot less call for mechanics. As usual, if you're really good at what you do or have the kind of personality that allows you to form your own successful business, you might have stable employment.

    Make certain you go to University and get hat Liberal Arts degree. Thos degrees have a good track record of stable secure jobs.

    In the fast food and retail outlet industries.

    Next time you need a plumber, call a Philosophy or Gender studies major.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  92. Re:Fake News by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    No, it's dead on.

    Best advice to your high schooler:

    If you really wanna go to college, put off buying a house for 10 years after graduation.

    If you want to earn money without debt;

    - If you don't mind being wet, be a plumber. - If you don't mind being dirty, be an auto tech. This is going to get cleaner. - Otherwise, be an electrician.

    Wanna pull in some bucks? Become a machinist. A master machinist is pulling down a nice salary. And the knowledge is a rough equivalent of a Master's degree, except it's earned over time, and you get paid well while you are earning it.

    The problem unfortunately is the long lived idea that unless you have that college degree - any degree at all, you are elite, much better than those neanderthals who were so stupid that they had to become a mason or plumber or technician of any sort.

    Way back in High School, I decided that I would take a double major, Adademic path as well as Electronics at the County Trade school. It was difficult juggling all the requirements of both. I never had a study hall or lunch in high school. and all kind of weird things happened like I had to skip one year of Physical-ed, then my senior year I had it every day.

    But I recall my guidance counsellor continually trying to get me to drop the Technical part and go straight Academic path. Then I even got pulled out of class to meet with the Principle. "You're a really smart boy, Ol - people are going to think you're stupid if you go to "Tech school". But I didn't listen.

    Best decision I ever made. By the time I entered the work force I could support myself, and then have my college education mostly paid for by my employer. I could perform both academic and practical functions.

    The biggest thing it taught me was that the so called smart people, who were soooo smart about matters of education, were actually lame ass clones. Turned me into a skeptic about most everything.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  93. Re:I'm who makes these fools look stupid by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    very few are doers but I am one.

    You are, buddy. Don't let anyone tell you different. Stay strong, and never back down.

    Oh - I thought he meant do-do 'er.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  94. Re: Fake News by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    Actually that is more the fault of car manufactures making it super difficult to repair their stuff. This eliminates most smaller auto shops, unless they pay a ridiculous amount to become an authorized repair center, which only then they get all of the proper service manuals and diagnostic codes. This mostly limits repairs to dealerships, unless it's more simple tasks like flushing air conditioners, fixing power steering, air filter change and oil change.

  95. Re: Fake News by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    Most cars could be much more easily fixed back then and it paid to have a mechanic to replace a belt or make an adjustment or two.

    Now days there's too much specialized computer shit that requires computers to fix. In my mind a car that can't be fixed on the side of the road is less reliable than one that requires a full bay and thousands to repair.

    I will be keeping my older cars thank you!

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  96. Re:Who's gonna hire the SJW snowflakes graduating? by lgw · · Score: 1

    Generally not-very-lucrative white-collar administrative work. It's the dirty secret of the profession. I know two people who went through hat - one works crap jobs now, the other started her own firm (she specialized in doing evictions during the last real estate bust, so that turned out OK for her given the huge demand at the time, but odds were low).

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  97. Re: Fake News by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

    You're either really stupid and you have no idea what kinds of jobs are available, and just how inexpensive you can get an education for, or are trying to justify the fact that you borrowed too much money to pay for your education, which would also make you stupid.

    Pro tip: You don't need to go to an expensive university. I went to community college, got a CCNP R&S, and transferred 90 of those credits to the least expensive state university just so I could get a token bachelor's degree. After FAFSA, a few automatic college grants that were based on FAFSA, my tuition was covered about 105% (yes, I profited.) I also got grants that required having only a 3.5 GPA (out of 4) and doing some extra project, and the rest from winning 3 different contests involving networking technical skills that doled out $1k each. My total costs for all of this were a net negative of somewhere around $6,000.

    After 3 years of graduating, I was already making $76k annually, and I never borrowed a cent. I've always thought borrowing money is stupid, in fact I don't plan on ever getting a mortgage, rather I'm saving and investing 50% of my income.

  98. Re:Ol Olsoc then why'd I shit on you so easily? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    See subject: Ol Olsoc you EAT "do-do" after your false accusation I don't write my code https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9875023&cid=53281611/ and you are obviously a Zontar The Mindless sockpuppet appearing in a thread where he is too (go figure since you're KNOWN to make sockpuppets to troll me Zontar https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=5038387&cid=46782891/ by your own admission).

    * You FAIL fool... busted.

    APK

    P.S.=> Your dull "ne'er-do-well" easily out-thought brains make me laugh... apk

    Life is long and hard, little anonymous coward. It's even longer and harder when you suffer from metastasis of the humor gland. Bummer that.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  99. Re: Impersonting me & libeling me? LMAO! apk by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    When most people realize they are talking to the mentally unstable, we generally feel bad for you and the people who should be looking after you. Before that, they just think you're a dumb, rascist piece of shit.

  100. Re: They are & I only do it IF attacked 1st by Brockmire · · Score: 1

    When I keep reading you say, "ne'er-do-well', I keep wondering what fucking century do you think you're in. Who the fuck still talks that way?

  101. Re:Life's hard on cowards dying a 1,000 deaths by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    By a 1,000 cuts your kind bring on themselves hiding behind a 1,000 sockpuppet fake names blown away https://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=12036901&cid=56515965/ Big humor I am LAUGHING @ U for!

    APK

    P.S.=> Soyboy INFERIOR one, go away - for your own good. Think I ENJOY blowing you & yours away using your fuckups against you? LOL , guess what?? I do, lol - thanks... apk

    Meth is bad m'kay?

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  102. Re: Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    yeah, and the car is the same next year as last year...oh, wait, NO

  103. Re: Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    In the marketing and Decision support industries especially, Liberal Arts dominate.
    Because, you know, English.

  104. Re:Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    A master machinist? How do you become one, with automated machining being the norm?
    Oh, wait, can't.

  105. Re:Fake News by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    Of course you do.Eventually someone makes the thing that makes the thing. Machinist is a thriving trade.

    If that's not making sense, then be a welder.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  106. Re: Fake News by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Funny enough, a while back, there was a study, looking at Canada, that even a Liberal Arts Education usually resulted in better pay then not having one. It was something like $80k with a good degree, $60k with a lousy degree and $40k with no degree.
    A lot of people forget that the arts used to cover a lot of subjects, basically everything that wasn't covered by science. You can look at the US Constitution where they updated the reason for copyright from the original "For the advancement of learning" to "the arts and sciences".

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  107. Re: Fake News by dryeo · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of truth in that, and it is getting worst, but at the same time, things like points have gone away, spark plugs can last a 100,000 miles and so on.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  108. Re: Fake News by dryeo · · Score: 1

    Unluckily my last non-computerized vehicle rusted away and now that I'm driving a '91, things break that can't be fixed on the side of the road. This is partially due to being a Ford, which I'd swear was engineered to be hard to fix. Last thing I did was a fuel pump. Stupid thing is in the tank and the tank was an inch bigger then the hole in the frame that it had to dropped out of. Before it was the clutch slave cylinder, which they helpfully put inside the bell housing. Before that it was a wiring problem in the brake lights, they helpfully ran the wire up and down the steering column, through the little u-joint.
    I dread getting anything newer.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  109. Brockmire did you like the taste (LOL)? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    See subject & now that you made a mistake posting via your "registered luser" FAKE NAME? EAT https://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10557875&cid=54347839/ & tell us - how did EATING YOUR WORDS taste?

    * RoTfLmAo...

    (A wee bit like your FOOT in your MOUTH bitch? Washed down w/ a bitter taste of SELF defeat? LOL, yes).

    APK

    P.S.=> SILENCE imbecile & have manners & do NOT talk while you EAT bitch, lol... apk

  110. Re:Projecting your own problems? Yes by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    See my subject & letting you f yourself dumbass https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9875023&cid=53281611/ you inferior moron.

    * Don't try "patronize" me BOY when I can show you are less than ZERO fucker... easily.

    APK

    P.S.=> Your DIM brains are blatantly inferior evidenced by your FAKE NAMES online for FAKE lives of being "ne'er-do-well" scum having the AUDACITY to even TRY "F" w/ me & ones like you you INFERIOR swine as I cast PEARLS before SWINE like you... apk

    You know - one of the things that I really enjoy, is trolling the living diarrhea out of people like you. I can envision your blood pressure rising, face red. spittle flecks on your screen and keyboard. MEanwhile I relax with a nice flavored seltzer water. But honey - you're slipping and your troll game is getting a little shabby and rookie-like. . Step it up before I get bored with you and start ignoring you.

    tl;dr.....Up your game, noob! Serve me my Friday entertainment.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  111. Re: Fake News by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    In the marketing and Decision support industries especially, Liberal Arts dominate. Because, you know, English.

    While I can't vouch for the numbers of employees, the pay certainly stinks

    https://www.shrm.org/Resources...

    http://work.chron.com/median-s...

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  112. Re: Fake News by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    So that's why we have such terrible decisions being made. Stupid people making them.

  113. Re:Fake News by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    A master machinist? How do you become one, with automated machining being the norm? Oh, wait, can't.

    Are you a High School guidance counselor. You have a very skewed 1980's outlook. That machine needs programmed, and they need watched over. We have a lot of machinists, they are proficient in dozens of machines. And occasionally you have to turn out a part in the old fashioned way. You need to visit a modern Machine shop. Many people working, and just because they wear. jeans and work shirts doesn't mean they are stupid and low class, or worth less than the drones in Human resources who have to "dress for success". Worth much much more in fact.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  114. Re:Fake News by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Of course you do.Eventually someone makes the thing that makes the thing. Machinist is a thriving trade.

    If that's not making sense, then be a welder.

    Thriving indeed! I think a lot of Slashdotters might not have ever come to grips with the fact that not everything is computer programming. It's a thriving job, a good job, and given the results of screwing the pooch on a big piece of expensive metal, is a job for dedicated and exacting people. A lot of computer knowledge and expertise on multiple machines needed. I think our AutodidactLabrat friend hasn't found that out yet. He might even be the AC who I'm playing with in a sub-thread here.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  115. Re: Fake News by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Funny enough, a while back, there was a study, looking at Canada, that even a Liberal Arts Education usually resulted in better pay then not having one. It was something like $80k with a good degree, $60k with a lousy degree and $40k with no degree. A lot of people forget that the arts used to cover a lot of subjects, basically everything that wasn't covered by science. You can look at the US Constitution where they updated the reason for copyright from the original "For the advancement of learning" to "the arts and sciences".

    Wow- if I had a liberal arts degree, I'd move to Canada. Here it's around 40 K average. If I could get 80 K with a lib Arts, that would make it seriously better than all of the effort you have to put into an engineering degree. The liberal arts students are party hearty, trying to kill their livers, while engineering students are in the library most of the night. The benefits for a hella lot less work are obvious!

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  116. Re: Fake News by dryeo · · Score: 1

    You misread my comment, the crappy degrees such as liberal arts came in in between no degree and a good degree such as engineering. Kinda makes sense as there are a lot of jobs where they just want some kind of degree that won't actually be used.

    --
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
  117. Re: Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Yeah, most of the stupid people are in business school as Harvard admits only 1/12 are any net value

  118. Re:Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    And that requires a 4 year degree in mechanical engineering
    A lathe operator is useless for CNC work.

  119. Re: Fake News by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Harvard is in a special class by themselves. For years the joke was - business going out of business? Must have had at least 50% MBAs from Harvard. They've ruined many companies I've heard over and over through the years.

    They make sure that they get big bucks, however.

  120. Re: Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Sorry, Harvard MBA is still among the most respected in the industry
    And the utter worthlessness of the MBA is documented in everything from the 2007 crash debacle to the anti-competitive stance of American industry.

  121. Re: Fake News by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Did you read what you wrote? Most respected in the first line, utterly worthless in the second line?

    Well you did get me to laugh. Wanna blow a bunch of money? Hire a Harvard MBA. They do it like nobody else can.

    Never the less, I think I'm safe in saying I'll never hire a Harvard MBA. Not even on a bet.

  122. Re: Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    By all means, go with your best choice, say Liberty University.
    or maybe Yale
    but by ALL means don't go with #1 ranked MBA school Harvard which admits that most MBA grads are worthless at adding value to the corporation.

  123. Re:Fake News by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    And that requires a 4 year degree in mechanical engineering A lathe operator is useless for CNC work.

    You think that machinists are able to know only one thing? Amazing. You're trolling aren't you?

    i must educate you. A college degree is not the final arbiter, the expression of intelligence and competence. In fact, in the grad inflated world of 2018 - that vaunted degree? It is for most majors, merely grades 13 through 16.

    To be a machinist today - or yesterday for that matter - requires an indepth and accurate understanding of math and geometry. Not the maths of the preofessional test takers and the crammers, but the kind of math where one tiny mistake on your part can detroy a million dollars in an instant. This is not the job for someone who spent their college years getting "the college experience" and taking majors that amount to giving your opinion.

    I've met plenty of not very intelligent liberal arts majors. But never a dumb machineist. So since you're either a troll or just don't take telling, Good day, sir.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  124. Re:"Big accomplishment" admitting you = a troll by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Ol Olsoc see subject & you enjoy me showing how dumb you are w/ you defeating yourself https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9875023&cid=53281611/ ?

    * THANKS (for making ME look GOOD & yourself the FAKE NAME for your FAKE LIFE troll trash you are, admittedly).

    APK

    P.S.=> You're also projecting how YOU are reacting when I prove how stupid you are in that link above (again, thanks - you just do NOT "get it", do you? I love letting "your kind" (online troll trash that act like bitches) destroy yourselves for me - takes no effort, see link above, lol (which is WHY you "hide" behind FAKE NAMES online))... apk

    This folks, is what happens when a person doesn't have both oars in the water.

    Seriously though Marilyn, you're getting repetitive. This is your last warning to step up your game. I really don't want to ignore you, but unless you entertain me - I'll have to.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  125. Re:Ol Olsoc fake name for your fake life... apk by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Ol Olsoc see subject: Your bs made you EAT YOUR WORDS & blew you outta the water https://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=9875023&cid=53281611/ easily!

    * You made that possible for me & YOU ONLY DID IT TO YOURSELF, lol!

    (Lastly: Marilyn? LOL - better than being YOU, 'slapped around "SALLY"' & your libelous lies in that link above that proves you only do THAT to yourself w/ your wasted troll life using a FAKE NAME for your FAKE LIFE online!)

    APK

    P.S.=> Entertainment? That link above really "triggers" you - lol, I can't PAY for FINER entertainment than seeing a libelous LIAR like you EAT YOUR WORDS, lol... apk

    Oh, the sadness. Here you were, given the chance to achieve internet greatness, and you simply blew it. It is a real pity, but in truth, so few are up to the task. So while you have transgreesed into boring me, I'll not hold any ill will against those who are just lacking the tools to be great, and must settle to being with the garden variety trolls.

    Work on your content - one does not become a superior troll over night. The lame repetition of the same lame words over and over again shows the limits of your ability.

    So really - I don't have time to be bored to tears with ya. Good day, and Yours in Christ Jesus, amen.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  126. Re: Fake News by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Harvard only admits people whose parents are alumni and give large endowments. Ivy leagues are fake schools with fake credentials that are not worth the money.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  127. Re:Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    So, You think a machinist can do 3D path analysis complete with corner performance brackets?
    No, moron, not on a lathe or a mill. Not even once.

  128. Re: Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Wrong
    Just ask the admissions counselor.

  129. Re: Fake News by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    And why would the Admissions Counselor be a credible witness in this case?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  130. Re: Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Because THOSE people do the math and have the statistics, you have hate.
    Under such circumstances you lose.

  131. Re: Fake News by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Statistics is only as good as the source. I have zero reason to trust the source.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  132. Re: Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Meaning you trust...what, bullshit rightwing spew sites and Faux Noise?
    As opposed to, say, Wall Street Journal?
    I see the problem
    Your recto-cranial intesseption did not include a glass navel.

  133. Re: Fake News by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    The Wall Street Journal and Faux News don't take human dignity into account, and both are horribly biased against rural populations.

    "diversity" is just skin deep to you, isn't it?

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  134. Re: Fake News by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Human dignity? Biased AGAINST Faux Noise largest base, 68-73 year old rural whites?
    Seriously, you live in nowhere
    Diversity with white old males holding 99% of the power positions is not diverse.

  135. Re: Fake News by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    Like I said- diversity to you is just skin deep. All you can see is skin color, you don't recognize the huge diversity in ethnicity in white people nor do you recognize neuraldiversity nor do you understand the diversity in rural populations.

    And yes, old rural farmers may be the biggest base faux has, but that leaves out a TON of other rural populations.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.