Slashdot Mirror


Has the Love Affair With Driving Gotten Stuck in Traffic? (washingtonpost.com)

America's love affair with the automobile and those dreams of roaring off on open highways are on the wane as the nation grapples with too much stop-and-go traffic and too many hours spent behind the steering wheel. From a report: Those findings are contained in a report to be released Thursday by Arity, a technology research spinoff created two years ago by Allstate Insurance. Arity underscored the growing disillusionment by using an illustration: Americans, on average, spend more time in their cars -- mostly driving to and from work -- than they receive in vacation time. Arity researchers said most people average 321 hours in the car each year and get 120 hours of vacation [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; an alternative source was not immediately available.]. "To me, that really crystallizes the issue," said Lisa Jillson, who leads Arity's research and design department. "I get a certain amount of vacation time, and I spend almost three times that in my car just getting back and forth to a job."

Her research showed a notable difference between millennials and baby boomers. Unhappiness with driving becomes more pronounced, with 59 percent of millennials saying they'd "rather spend time doing more productive tasks than driving," while only 45 percent of baby boomers make that same statement.

332 comments

  1. Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Either pick your employer to be near your home or buy a home with prospective employers nearby. Commuting is for people who didn't think ahead, and they pay a price and even may die because of it. Think ahead or die on the road.

    1. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sounds pretty damn easy for you. But when advancement can only be had by changing jobs every 2-3 years, trying to move with every job means paying rent forever. Unless you think anyone can work anywhere they want? Otherwise most of us schmucks have to go to where the job is.

    2. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by MightyYar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Easy to say when single.

      When I was a bachelor, I would rent within walking distance of my employer, even though it was in the suburbs and it involved me cutting through some business parks. Then I got married and my wife got a job. Then my employer moved. Then we had kids and had to think about school districts. We moved to a place that is a 5 mile commute (in heavy traffic) for her and a 10 mile commute for me (in light to moderate traffic) with a decent school system. But either of us could get fired tomorrow and our commute could change, and we wouldn't be able to move without uprooting our kids and selling our home.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      I'm wondering where all these people live where there is SO much traffic every day?

      Are they only polling places like D.C, L.A. , Houston?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      I want to live where you live. In every city that I know of, they designed the roadways for less than half of the current traffic load. Almost everywhere, there is a traffic jam twice a day.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    5. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      ...and we wouldn't be able to move without uprooting our kids and selling our home.

      Well, this is nothing new. People have had to uproot and move to jobs for most modern days.

      And heck, in the 60's - 90's...it was a bit more difficult as that no internet, you had to manually let everyone know where you'd moved, etc.

      And there was no such thing as working remotely, which is more and more becoming an option today.

      But really, no one in several decades assumed they were entitled to stay at one job, in one city, and not have to move a bit to where better jobs were. My family did it as I was growing up, as that Dad moved us when better jobs were to be had for the family. This was for Electrical Engineering.....but yes, we started renting, but then bought houses, and part of life was selling house and moving to a new town.

      So, this isn't something new....families have done this for longer than I have lived.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd tell you but then you'd want to move here which would just make our traffic load worse. Sorry.

    7. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      What does this have to do with the rebuttal he made to the AC parent? Sure, people have had to deal with jobs moving and it makes living close to your job problematic, and yet having dual careers in the household to cater to makes it essentially impossible.

    8. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's pretty damn easy more than it isn't. If there's only one employer in an area that would be a real limitation, but for most people that's not the case. "The job" is where you take it. If you can't plan ahead, expect to die on the road.

      But don't pretend you have "no control" over that, most people do whether or not they're willing to sacrifice something to eliminate commuting long distances. If you can't figure it out, sucks to be you I guess.

    9. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      ...and yet having dual careers in the household to cater to makes it essentially impossible.

      Why is it impossible?

      Basically, you move with the person that makes the most money, right?

      It's the golden rule: "He who makes the most gold, makes the rules".

      But seriously, whichever one makes the most $$....if they have to move, then you do.

      Is it easy? No.

      Is it convenient? No.

      Is it doable...and pretty much required in modern life to advance? Yes.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    10. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nomadic lifestyle isn't for everybody. We build cities for a reason. If we can vote for stability, we will. We can start by not letting transient multi-national corporations set up shop without very long term obligations written into the contract. Don't let outsiders buy up and fence off all the property and other resources. Give preference to the locals and they will flourish. Problem is that the locals are impressed by all the 'easy' money the transients promise. And once they bite the apple, it's all downhill.

    11. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not because your're single, it's because you're suburban.

      Everything about suburban living scales terribly and as the nation grows traffic will only get worse.

    12. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by peragrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually the 60's -90's you got one job and stayed with it until you died.

      You might only work for 2-3 companies your entire life.

      Millineials basically have to get a new job every 5 years with a new employer as employers do not give out wage increases otherwise. Why do you think wage growth has basically been negative for the last 15 years compared to inflation?

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    13. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I want to live where you live. In every city that I know of, they designed the roadways for less than half of the current traffic load. Almost everywhere, there is a traffic jam twice a day.

      I"ve live all over the south east and south central areas of the US mostly, but also in other states, some out west.

      Sure, there is rush hour, but I've never been stuck in traffic for an hour or more as a normal thing.

      Most of my commutes have been in the 10-15min range each way avg.

      I did have one job, that had a 35min commute each way, but that was not due to traffic, but the job was a good one that was a bit farther than usual to where I lived, but it wasn't too bad, I'd just throw on some tunes and jam down the road...I bought my first corvette for that one, so I got there and back pretty fast.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    14. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by djinn6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's a few big differences between then and now:

      1. Both parents work now, so it's much harder to find a place that's close for both
      2. People change jobs every 2-3 years, instead of staying at one company for decades
      3. Houses have become much more expensive, together with the associated transaction costs

    15. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by sjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the '60s, there was usually just one job to consider per family. In the '70s, there was one primary job and a secondary job that was fairly easy to replace or even do without for a bit. That made things a lot easier logistically.

    16. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Actually the 60's -90's you got one job and stayed with it until you died.

      I grew up through those years, and you are wrong...at least from my experience, and all of my friends i grew up with along the way (and along the moves).

      We didn't really settle in one place for a LONG period of time, till I was starting about 6th grade or so.

      I myself moved for schooling and jobs for most of my younger years...till about age 35 or so....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lower your expectations: buy used cars, don't renovate your damn kitchen and toilet every 2.5 years to keep up with the Joneses (20 or 30 year old appliances work fine), don't switch phones/laptops/iPads every year, buy a small house with a small yard, or better yet, a 2-family where some other schmoe pays your mortgage.

      Then you won't need a second income or to job-jump to "advance" every 2-3 years.

    18. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by PPH · · Score: 1

      they designed the roadways for less than half of the current traffic load

      Then the city is full. And they need to stop issuing building permits. If it was an overtaxed water or sewer system, it's not unheard of for cities to declare moratoriums on new construction. Why not with roads?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    19. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sexist pig!

    20. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if something applies to you, it applies to everyone, right?

    21. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by rogoshen1 · · Score: 0

      No thank you. I'll gladly take the 35 minute commute from house way out in the woods on acreage -- and not have to deal with neighbors, HOA's, or people in general.

      Not everyone wants to live in a suburban or urban hellscape.

    22. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by MyrddinBach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It has been shown that it's nearly impossible to build enough roadway in high traffic areas because as soon as you add more roadway it gets filled to capacity *immediately*.

    23. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds pretty damn easy for you. But when advancement can only be had by changing jobs every 2-3 years, trying to move with every job means paying rent forever. Unless you think anyone can work anywhere they want? Otherwise most of us schmucks have to go to where the job is.

      Generally people who "can work anywhere" can do so as they don't have specialized skills, so they can "go anywhere" but also have way more competition for those same jobs everywhere as well since they do something that everyone can do.

    24. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What the fuck are you arguing against? Somebody said move to your job rather than care about the improvement of roads and transportation. The other person said that's not a practical solution for huge swaths of people when there's two jobs and kids. Your point is, apparently, "Yes, you're right, it's not a solution, stop whining about it."

      Like somebody saying, "Hey this could make things better" and your answer is "My perceived experience with this inconvenience means you shouldn't be interested in whether the conditions dealing with it deteriorate or improve." You're a dumbfuck, cayenne8. Every fucking day.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    25. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering where all these people live where there is SO much traffic every day?

      Are they only polling places like D.C, L.A. , Houston?

      It can take me anywhere from 1-2 hours to get home here in the ATL. Work southside, live very far northside (only good place with halfway decent housing costs and even those have skyrocketed the past 3 years). Can't move because wife works northside. Of course, the main problem here is they have 2 major highways merge through the city. If they would split the 2 highways it would reduce travel time for me because most downtown traffic is for the other main highway.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    26. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That post pretty much says "I don't understand anything about economics, sociology, or politics, so let me make this suggestion I find incredibly insightful but will be useless in practice."

    27. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Mine did. Everyone I went to school with had two working parents. Little suburb of 9000 in the western edge of Minnesota's Gold Coast (Lake Minnetonka)
      2. My parents and most of their friends were teachers, with all the inherent perks and downsides that means (tenure, low pay, unions, no path to management) but those people who weren't teachers seemed to change jobs pretty often.
      3. Yes, houses are more expensive. That one is correct, but very few people could work from home back in the 60's - 90's and the modern definition of a nice house is far, far different than what my parent's was. A couple with three kids could expect three rooms and a single bathroom. A sledgehammer, some pipe and a couple bags of QuickCrete and you got a second bathroom in the basement. Some 2 x 4s, a little drywall and some cheap carpet and you had a basement bedroom. Nothing up to code, mind you, but as long as you didn't climb the walls you'd be fine. Things were cheaper back then, but you didn't get much more for your money. My parents bought their house in 1958 and didn't get whole-hose A/C until 1984. No one did, really. Cheap fuse panels, minimal duct work, ancient furnaces, 1/4 " pipes when 1/2" would be code. Those places were horror shows.
      Then and now -- you get what you pay for.

    28. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Kjella · · Score: 1

      ...and we wouldn't be able to move without uprooting our kids and selling our home.

      My family did it as I was growing up, as that Dad moved us when better jobs were to be had for the family. (...) So, this isn't something new....families have done this for longer than I have lived.

      A few kids do. I'm trying to think back and from 1st through 9th grade, out of ~50 pupils in two classes I'm struggling to remember even a handful that moved out of or into the school district, I remember two and it certainly wasn't every year. Maybe it's a cultural thing or that my neighborhood was exceptionally stable but my impression is that a lot of people are looking to move when they have toddlers, but then there's a decade's solid freeze until high school. In the short term I know people who drove 1-2 hour commutes each way, every day in order to stay put until they can find work closer to home. There are certainly those who'd drag their family along for even a modest raise or career advancement, but my impression is that for most it either takes a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity or they've lost their main income and fate more or less forces their hand.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    29. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Everyone can survive without keeping up with the neighbors. It's kind of like needing water, pooping, or pissing,

    30. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      My employer just moved my office recently, and it doubled my commute.

      Sounds bad, until you realize that my commute is now 18 minutes.

      Everything is relative.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    31. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know what happens when a city stops growing? It stagnates and dies. Cities plan for growth, and when it stops happening, bad things happen to the plans based on growth. Governments can grow quite easily, but shrinking is very hard, and often behind the curve creating a death spiral for the city. It doesn't happen very often, but when it does, it is ugly.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    32. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by danbert8 · · Score: 2

      Except new developments, new jobs, and new residents mean more tax revenue. Local governments all want that and they don't want to spend it on infrastructure. They want to spend it on nice offices, pay raises, pensions, parks, signs, chambers of commerce, and anything except roads, schools, police, fire, or water services.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    33. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by danbert8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is some truth to that. As you build more capacity, traffic in that spot gets worse, but traffic *in general* gets better. The traffic on the main throughfare gets worse, but the traffic on the side streets and alternate routes improves. The key is to expand multiple roads and not just the one.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    34. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      No, it's not because I'm suburban.

      My job is suburban. Even so, for a while when I was single I lived in the city before I got tired of the commute and high rent.

      My kids simply cannot use the public education system in the city, so it's a non-starter there. I'd have to pay for private school.

      My wife actually works in the city, which is why here commute is so hellish.

      Our compromise is that we live in a first-ring suburb with excellent bus and train access. We can be downtown in 20 minutes on public transit, which ironically is better downtown access than when I lived in Manhattan. The schools aren't the absolute best, but they are good enough if you stay on top of your kids, and you don't need to worry about testing into a magnet school. We've had the same cars for 10 years and we've maybe driven 110,000 miles between the two of them... we're not exactly captives to the automobile.

      Anyway my point is we did think ahead, spent a lot of time planning out where we are in relation to our jobs and weighing factors like access to the city and schools. But I'm not single, so I sit in traffic.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    35. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those people with short commutes in the 60s and 70s killed all the highway development because they didn't want to split neighborhoods and highways back then were loud and polluting. Now it's too expensive to get the right of way to expand and add new highways so we are all screwed.

      Look at Atlanta vs cities like Houston and LA. At least in Houston and LA there are multiple highways and alternate routes. If the downtown connector gets shut down due to a pinhole camera on a bridge, the entire city is screwed because the ONE perimeter route is already clogged with just local traffic.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    36. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      . Commuting is for people who didn't think ahead, and they pay a price and even may die because of it.

      Or can't afford to buy, or think buying is a bad investment, that property which is close to where they work. In my case, the homes which would require no traffic are in the $1-$2M range. I work just outside of a "cheap" city. I cannot imagine what people in Si Valley deal with.

    37. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Actually the 60's -90's you got one job and stayed with it until you died.

      This is a myth. Average job tenure is higher today that it was in the past.

      Sure, there were some people that had jobs for life (and still are today), but that was not common, especially if you were female or non-white.

      The "golden age" of jobs for a lifetime never existed.

      Why do you think wage growth has basically been negative for the last 15 years compared to inflation?

      It hasn't. Median wages, corrected for inflation, are higher than 15 years ago.

      Median household income has gone up less, because of a decline in workforce participation, but even that has not been negative.

    38. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I don't really disagree, but how does that rebut my point? You can't say "move close to work" when there are people in the household who work 15 miles apart - the best you can do is split the difference. Bad schools mean some areas are less attractive if you have kids. Uprooting the kids is of course an option, but it is not without cost - so one weighs the costs and the benefits. Would you uproot your kids to save 5 minutes on your commute? How about 30? That line is very dependent on your circumstances.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    39. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      But seriously, whichever one makes the most $$....if they have to move, then you do.

      Uh, that's what I did - and the place I found was 15 miles from her workplace. She works in the absolute shittiest part of the city. If there was an engineering job there, I couldn't find it.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    40. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1, Insightful

      3. Houses have become much more expensive

      They are also much bigger. New houses today are twice as big as houses built 50 years ago, despite families getting smaller.

      Adjusted for inflation, the average cost per square-foot has barely changed.

    41. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Informative

      No need to argue, we have data!

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    42. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Do not react to NPCs, but thank you for pointing out the absurdity of his argument.

    43. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and we wouldn't be able to move without uprooting our kids and selling our home.

      My family did it as I was growing up, as that Dad moved us when better jobs were to be had for the family. (...) So, this isn't something new....families have done this for longer than I have lived.

      A few kids do. I'm trying to think back and from 1st through 9th grade, out of ~50 pupils in two classes I'm struggling to remember even a handful that moved out of or into the school district, I remember two and it certainly wasn't every year. Maybe it's a cultural thing or that my neighborhood was exceptionally stable but my impression is that a lot of people are looking to move when they have toddlers, but then there's a decade's solid freeze until high school.

      Same, many of the kids that I graduated high school with I had known since grade school and from those I've kept touch with most still live within 40 miles of where we all grew up and this was in a big suburb, not some rural town.

    44. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      NJ sucks. We have one of the highest population densities, but I've been at my place of work too long and am doing too well to leave, yet moving isn't a viable option for other reasons either. I've a 40 minute to 1 hour drive one way each day, depending on traffic. Twice this week alone, Rt295N was backed up for miles in the morning due to accidents. Every year it gets worse; more accidents, more traffic, more lane closures, even more assholes cutting you off or not playing nice with others. (and turn signals? What are those? )
      Anymore, I hate driving. I want those hours of my life back to do something besides concentrating and staring at a road.. or sitting, waiting at endless traffic lights.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    45. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by PPH · · Score: 1

      That post pretty much says "I don't understand anything about economics, sociology, or politics

      Well then. Please elucidate. Bestow some of your vast wisdom upon us.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    46. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by PPH · · Score: 3, Informative

      Cities plan for growth, and when it stops happening, bad things happen

      Ponzi planned for growth.

      Many perfectly viable businesses have upper limits on growth and seem to succeed without it. My dentist, for one example.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    47. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Live in an RV and park it in your employers parking lot. No rent or mortgage and no commute. Problem solved!

    48. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Harlequin80 · · Score: 0

      Only if roads are your measure of max capacity.

      Increase your density and you increase your localised consumption demands and your localised supply of workers. This leads to business growth in the area which then leads to more worker demand which leads to more demand for density.

      The real issue is suburbia. Each person having their 700sqm block and 4 bed 2 garage house. The transport infrastructure cost for that is prohibitive, so you end up with traffic jams.

    49. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by brantondaveperson · · Score: 0

      But either of us could get fired tomorrow.

      Sounds like borderline non-existent employee protection laws, and consequent insecurity of employment are the real problems here. Plus, American cities are built far too spread out, often with a dying centre, surrounded by industry, surrounded by suburbs. So city planning failed too. I'm not at all sure that other countries experience the same problems - although when I lived in the UK I commuted 40 minutes each way. That sure sucked.

      Where I live now, I'm able to get to work on my bike in 20 minutes, and the kids get to their schools in five minutes on theirs. Even so, some people choose to live an hour's drive away. Go figure.

    50. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Houses have become much more expensive

      American houses are absolutely insanely huge. The rest of the world manages just fine in much smaller accomodation.

    51. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by tepples · · Score: 1

      Basically, you move with the person that makes the most money, right?

      It's the golden rule: "He who makes the most gold, makes the rules".

      Sexist pig!

      I see no sexist asymmetry in cayenne8's comment. As I understand the comment, if he makes more money than she does, he and she ought to live close to where he works. If she makes more money than he does, he and she ought to live close to where she works.

    52. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      I have not met one child of military that was not messed up in some way. The school near me that had military kids is the most problematic school in the area.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    53. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by geggam · · Score: 2

      2 People work in most households so divide that wage by 2

      I saw my dad support us during the 60-70s easily with blue collar work and mom get a part time job when the 80s S&L bust impacted the mortgage.

      She never stopped working after that

    54. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Where does it get better though? The one big study on "Induced Demand": https://www.aeaweb.org/article... - "We conclude that increased provision of roads or public transit is unlikely to relieve congestion."

      Just googling around suggests there's a 1:1 or near 1:1 correlation with capacity and increased traffic.

      That isn't to say we shouldn't build more lanes and roads, but as more people move to cities etc - traffic is going to get worse. Where I live - rush hour went from something that happens between 8-10 am in the morning and 4-7pm in the evening - now it's pretty much rush hour traffic all day every day from 7-9pm, and even on weekends.

    55. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      Problem is if enough people did so the country would (probably? what do I know) be in trouble. At least in the non-long run.

      That said I agree, and I do so too for the most part, I drive a 20+ year old car and use iPhone 4S. There are people who go farther though: "This couple lives on 6% of their income so they can give $100,000 a year to charity": https://qz.com/515655/this-cou...

    56. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Screw the ecahhhhnamy and most so-called economists. It's not environmentally sustainable for a country to be sustained by the constant production and destruction of throw-away junk.

    57. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was once pressganged by a recruitment agency into accepting a job with weeks. If I could fly direct by drone, it was only 10 miles away. The housing market was so tight that it took me four months to find somewhere convenient downtown (other locations were actually inside the cloverleaf of an freeway cloverleaf intersection, or in remote estates).

      But with the arrangement of ground level public transport, I had to spend three hours a day commuting there and back; 30 minute taxi, catamaran ferry, train journey and another taxi.
      Leave at 7.30am - get to work at 9.30am. Leave work at 5.30pm. Get home at 8.30pm

    58. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how you defend suburbanization while simultaneously name suburbanization as the cause of all of your problems.

      White people.

    59. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by mikael · · Score: 1

      The same problems happened in small cities. Usually there is one major intersection where circular roads meet arterial roads, or even just two intersections where commuters are trying to go into two different directions simultaneously at the same time, or all trying to go on the same road at the same time, exceeding capacity.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    60. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      It's impossible to avoid the commute unless you both work for the same employer, and then the family factors further complicate it is the point. E.g., we're equidistant from our employers now in an area with good schools. It'd be impossible for me to live within walking distance of my job, due to zoning and security, and even close to it would be poor schools. Living within walking distance of her work would involve living in rental housing catering to students, and a poor school district. So I have a 15 minute commute and she has a half hour commute.

    61. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by mikael · · Score: 1

      Because in many cases, they choose to build industrial estates and business parks next to sketchy parts of the city, while the good schools and housing are in the diametrically opposite part of the city. Business owners don't want commuters clogging up their deliveries. Residential owners don't want business parks spoiling their views. So the commutes just keep getting longer.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    62. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by mikael · · Score: 1

      Because commuters are constantly "shopping around" for a shorter commute. If they find a short cut, a rat run, or a suburb with a shorter commute time, they will use that.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    63. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd give you a mod point if you had citations and data...

    64. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree about cayenne8. I have yet to see him post anything that wasn't complete shit. Sadly hes not even a troll, just a douche.

      He is just one giant waste of fucking time.

    65. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Ha, I can't afford that. Commuting isn't as bad now as it used to be since the company moved closer to me (thus forstalling my leaving and looking for something closer). But generally the high paying jobs are not in places with affordable housing, especially in high tech. Rent across the street from where I work is more than double my mortgage. Buying it out of the question as the costs have gone up faster than the value of what I own, and at the age I am I'm not going to start a new mortgage unless it's someplace for retirement.

      Your advice is find if you're just a general purpose manage for a retail big box store in a podunk town. But then hope you don't get laid off when there's an economic downturn since there won't be replacement jobs. It's not as common now for new employers to pay relocation costs as it used to be either. If you're a high tech worker, you can't just work anywhere, the companies are not evenly spread around the country so that you can live wherever you want.

    66. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Yup, and that's why one of my coworkers bitched every day about his awful commute from San Francisco to San Jose, because his wife was the one who made the most money. But he still did the commute, he wasn't just going to quit and stay at home because you don't just give up that extra $160K/year because the commute is long.

    67. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      However cities changed. We used to have jobs downtown and people lived in suburbs and there was good mass transit options to get from there to downtown. Now the good jobs that pay a decent salary out out at the suburbs, and not necessarily the suburb you are in but the one 30 miles away or more, and the mass transit is not set up to handle that sort of commute.

    68. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Also companies today come and go, in many fields you couldn't keep a job for life if you wanted to.

    69. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 1

      Trip time reduction is not the point! The point is that the total throughput of the road (total number of trips) increases. That means more people can get where they want or need to go - for example you can build more housing and have those people get to and from jobs in a job center like a downtown area. In the same amount of time as before, of course, because the extra capacity gets filled up. But again, trip time reduction is not the point, and it's okay that trip time remains the same because the total number of trips increases.

    70. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Bay Area is just bad because of geography. Mountains and water means fewer freeways that everyone packs onto. And when you do have a good commute the jobs change and suddenly everyone wants to commute in a different pattern, or the roads designed for residential traffic are now handling heavier loads than intended. The mass transit is just badly designed because of political issue and because the commute patterns have changed since the mass transit was built. But many people put up with it for the sole reason that if you lose you job then you can find a similar one within a 20 mile radius.

    71. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They build new roads, they widen roads, etc. Which is why there's ALWAYS construction going on and that construction causes more traffic :-)

    72. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by grep+-v+'.*'+* · · Score: 1

      You might only work for 2-3 companies your entire life.

      *I* worked for three companies without ever quitting my job. *I* stayed in the same place, every 8 years the company would change around me.

      They finally mostly closed down our region and laid everyone off. Out of over a thousand, I was one of the last 20 to go. I'm not sure if that was good or NOT, everyone else had already settled down again before I even got out the door.

      --
      If the universe is someone's simulation -- does that mean the stars are just stuck pixels?
    73. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      2 People work in most households so divide that wage by 2

      Nope. The average American household has 1.3 earners.

      Households in the bottom 20% average 0.5 earners. Households in the top 20% average 2.0 earners.

      www.bls.gov

    74. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bay Area is completely gridlocked in every direction. It's completely messed up.

      There is no reverse commute any more. No escape.

      I'm Bay area native. I feel like a watermelon seed, spat out, nothing for me here now, nothing for my kids...

    75. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I don't think I did that at all. I defended my decision to be in the 'burbs, but not the concept of the 'burbs. You have to play the hand you are dealt. And yes, I'm white, but my wife is not - so you got that wrong, too. The main reason we picked the suburb that we are in is because it has both a lot of diversity and decent schools.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    76. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's a few big differences between then and now:

      1. Both parents work now, so it's much harder to find a place that's close for both
      2. People change jobs every 2-3 years, instead of staying at one company for decades
      3. Houses have become much more expensive, together with the associated transaction costs

      Yes, those are differences but there are others that were caused by the predominance of the automobile and have led to our dependence on it. So yes, the two income household is much more common now, but another change is that we are more likely to live farther away from where we grew up than we were prior the car. In the past we managed to find jobs in the same communities as our parents, sibling, aunts and uncles because it was a priority, - AND because individual communities had more jobs. Now we have bedroom communities with relatively few businesses and jobs compared to the number of people living there, and this is because of the car. When my wife and I lived in a 2nd ring suburb, the chances of us both finding a job there was almost nil even though we both have careers that are in high demand fields. We now live in a city and both of us have changed jobs multiple times. We've been here 20 years and have never had to move to stay close to work.

      I was born in the early 60's in a small town. At the time, there were corner stores, a movie theater, a resort, barbershops, clothing stores, and a lumber yard. There were small neighborhood schools and churches. Now most of the retail businesses are gone. The small churches and schools were replaced by mega churches and schools some of which are now outside of town. You need to drive there. But this is not a place in decline. The population is 10 times what it was, but all the things that used to be in town have been replaced by shopping centers, big box stores, and industrial parks located near major transportation corridors, in some cases two towns away. It was not a big deal in the 70's and 80's when this movement accelerated because it was an easy drive. Now that everyone has to drive everywhere and the population has grown, congestion is a big problem.

      And you're are right, houses are more expensive than the were in 1960. They are also twice as big even though the average family size has shrunk. There is something also very telling about the houses today versus houses built prior 1940 or even 1950. If you get a chance to look at an old house, what prominent feature is missing that virtually all houses of today all have? A garage. In fact a garage is often THE single largest identifiable part of a house. The square footage we dedicate to our cars is kind of insane when you think about it.

      Garage aside though, houses today are still huge by comparison. Do we really need houses that big? Should we really be driving 5 miles to go to a restaurant or bar instead of just being able to walk to them instead? In many ways, I think we have become victims of our own gluttony and laziness. 3/4 of US men are overweight. It would do us a whole lot of good to place people, retail, jobs, and services closer together and we walked or biked more and drove a whole lot less.

    77. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      There are very weak employee protection rules here - it's an "at will" employment state. I'm not an employee in any case - I'm a contractor/consultant.

      Our suburb is very old and train-centered. Our elementary school is less than half a mile from the house and we walk the kids daily. Or did, anyway - the older one now gets on the bus.

      I did a 40 minute commute for a single year when my wife got a new job. I bought a fuel efficient shitbox and listened to a lot of radio. That was pre-kids and she worked long hours, so I didn't feel like I was missing out on much. Now I'd hate that. But hey, some people drive cabs all day so I can't really complain. I have colleagues who drive an hour. One is getting married but he is downtown and his new wife works over an hour away (in no traffic) in an adjacent state. They are trying to figure out what to do - for now he may keep his downtown condo but only use it weeknights and then they will live together on weekends until one of them finds something more convenient. Single=Easy :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    78. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would. But of course most of you are morons.

    79. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      I commute a little over 40 miles each way, I have a nice little place in the country and the difference between renting here and renting in the city pays the fuel bill.

      Although you might be right about dying on the road a couple of months back i was behind a camper when it started going into the verge with barely time to think wtf a car comes speeding past (about 60-70mph) and ploughs into the car behind me.

      I was pretty lucky, i'd been let into traffic by that car behind me in the previous town. Strangely an old fella had been let in before me but for some reason he decided to turn back into the road he had been let out of. So it probably should have been me and that car behind me had no chance at all...

    80. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by LostMyAccount · · Score: 2

      Haha, the old Slashdot standard of mistaking possible with practical or even desirable.

      I figure a job change has to be really good to make the transaction costs of moving worthwhile, moving an entire family could cost upwards of $20,000 when you factor in market-necessary home improvements, selling costs, buying costs, moving costs, and any changes necessary to live in the new house (everything from fixing what's broken to furniture that fits the new house). Moving more than 3 times probably nullifies the financial gain from more lucrative positions.

      In fact, I'd even argue that economics suggests that frequent moving isn't that common, mostly because homes are generally oriented towards ownership and not rental. If frequent moving was economically desirable, we'd have a different economic structure around housing oriented towards longer term leases and rentals vs ownership, and probably an entirely different housing model than single family homes.

      While it's true there's a lot of rental out there, it's generally occupied by either childless old people, very young people or low-income families. Family housing generally isn't rental, and even if you wanted it your selection would be pretty tough because 3-4 BR, 1500 sq ft rentals are really uncommon. It's 1-2 BR and smaller sq footage.

      Moving a lot for a job is like chasing a mirage, it's all energy spent and little actually gained. It's best to min-max housing location, likely employment centers, commutes, schools, and then stay put. There's so much more to choosing your residence than commute -- access to shops, restaurants, recreation, etc.

    81. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Lower your expectations

      Why stop there. Live in the street. Collect food stamps. It's amazing the wealth you can accumulate when you don't pay for accomodation and eat from the bin.
      I mean the world is trending towards a gap in affordability and income, so clearly the problem here is expecatations.

      Also your impression of what people do in their houses is completely detached from reality. People don't renovate every 2.5 years. 30 year old appliances also do not work fine. In fact just owning a 30 year old appliance in countries where you don't get fantasy prices for electricity can often contribute to your affordability problem. People haven't been switching phones and laptops yearly for quite a while now, and even small houses with small yards are starting to get frigging expensive close to jobs (the entire topic of conversation).

    82. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Biologists have a word for uncontrolled growth; "Cancer"

    83. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you make equal pay to your spouse, and work 50 minutes apart, all you can do is split the difference if the school district in the middle is decent (or exists). Most professionals don't have the luxury of working in industries which operate near their spouses industry.

    84. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      seriously, 10 miles is biking distance

    85. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can top that. Same job, same cubicle even, three companies in five years. They game the system to keep you from earning better benefits by making sure that you'll never accumulate any significant service time with any one company. Occasionally they'll throw in a pay cut to keep costs down.

    86. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      And that will reduce my commute times?

      So more commute time, less safety, inability to shuttle kids around, requirement of shower when I get to work, susceptibility to rain and snow... what's not to like? At least if I survived I'd be in good cardiovascular health.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    87. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most cases, job jumping is the only way to get a raise that even matches inflation.

    88. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not met one child of military that was not messed up in some way. The school near me that had military kids is the most problematic school in the area.

      Maybe you consider me messed up...I'm a military brat, and went on to spend 22 years in the military myself. I retired at the age of 40, and now in my second career doing pretty good for myself. The people I have seen who were messed up were the ones home-schooled who never left their state (and some not even their county), especially if they were raised in a fundamentalist, religious household.

      Extreme lack of social skills and some basic knowledge about how the world is. in some cases, never met anyone outside of their race or ethnicity.

      On the other hand, most of the military brats I knew have done fairly well for themselves and are adaptable to new situations. Moving every few years teaches you to adapt and do it quickly. Add in the time many of us spend outside the US, and we are more open to other cultures, etc.

    89. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mostly it gets spent on roads, schools, police, fire, etc.

    90. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parks, signs and chambers of commerce are pretty important for quality of life of the populace, being able to find things, and jobs. What is your problem with those things?

    91. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      There are no bachelors in the top 20%?

    92. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Looking at the data, households on the top 20% have as few as zero and as many as 5 workers, or more. The average of 2.0 hides a lot, even if the modal value is 2. But $150,000 average with five working might not be impressive per person!

    93. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      3. Houses have become much more expensive

      They are also much bigger. New houses today are twice as big as houses built 50 years ago, despite families getting smaller.

      Adjusted for inflation, the average cost per square-foot has barely changed.

      They are only much bigger in the USA, maybe also Canada. In the UK they are much more expensive, and if anything smaller.

    94. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Just because you cycle to work it doesn't mean you can't shuttle kids at other times, surely?

    95. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      For me it would not work. In the summer, when the weather is best for cycling I need to drop the kids off at camp on my way to work. In the winter, I swing by their school on the way home from work to pick them up from after school activities. Not everyday, but it complicates things. Add it to the abject terror of biking in on narrow busy roads, weather unpleasantness, and the loss of time (and therefore money) - it just won't work for me. I'll even use the showers at work :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    96. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by strikethree · · Score: 1

      Lower your expectations

      Sounds great.

      buy used cars

      I already do, but you don't save as much money as you might think when you factor in all of the preventative maintenance that must be done because you can't be sure that the original owner performed maintenance religiously. Changing ALL of the fluids (transmission, brake, oil, coolant) and filters is not cheap. Depending on the age, you may want to also get the timing belt/chain serviced, rotors for the brakes, etc. Buying a new car obviates all of these efforts and the car is under warranty. But I still buy used cars.

      20 or 30 year old appliances work fine

      Oh. I thought we were dealing with reality here. That 20 year old refrigerator, if it is still working, uses more energy to keep stuff cold than a newer one costs overall. Spending money in one area to lower costs in another bears no relation to "lower expectations".

      don't switch phones/laptops/iPads every year

      Most of the people I know, do not switch out every year. All of them are eventually forced to switch due to planned obsolescence, but it is not every year. Examples would be laptops that have processors that are no longer "supported" in Windows 10 or Huawei not offering security patches for phones that are older than 2 years. I guess people could just stop using modern technology entirely, I mean who needs to receive phone calls or use the Internet? Surely YOU are not that important where you need any of those "conveniences".

      buy a small house with a small yard

      Can't afford even a small house, much less a large house. This one is easy to do; Just don't buy a house at all!

      or better yet, a 2-family where some other schmoe pays your mortgage.

      As much as I would love to lower my expectations, the concept of living off of someone else's labors is disturbing to me. If this is part of lowering my expectations, I want no part of it.

      I dunno dude. Your prescription doesn't seem to help much. Got anything more useful?

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    97. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Used cars: do the work yourself. Laptops/phones: you don't need "security support" to make phone calls or surf the Web. If you can't run Win 10, run 7 or Linux. Appliances: fridge may be worth it, others are not energy-wise. Being a landlord: it's a vocation like anything else -- all jobs and careers involve being paid from "others' labors."

    98. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You don't seem to understand the definition of the word career. The GP said each had a career, not that each had a job.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    99. Re: Work close to where you live as a priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For reference.

      Minimum wage being usd240/month (factory worker or farm help)
      A 500 sqft 2br condo costs 75,000 with gym n pool. For a couple with 1 kid.
      A 1000sqft flat with 3 rooms 2 toilet, no facilities is 87,000. For a full family, 2+2 or 2+3.
      And thats almost certainly below usa standards. Brick/concrete walls, 2 years (enforceable) warranty.

      Adjust the amounts to your local minimum wage. If you guys think usa is expensive or not large enough, come over to asia.

    100. Re:Work close to where you live as a priority by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      Funny you that you mention that. The place is so overcrowded, that their shit LITERALLY washed up on shore one day (not to mention that this was only one instance where the feces made it to shore). It was washed up on the beach for MILES.

      There's a video of it here. In the end, the city blamed it on Canadian geese! Ahh Fairhope, AL - home of the rich and tame-us.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
  2. I've been over it for years by DogDude · · Score: 1

    I've been over driving for years. I commute about an hour each way, wasting 2 hours of my life each day, or 2/16 of my woke life. I'm actively trying to move to a place where I don't have to waste hours sitting in a car every day.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:I've been over it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on your job, look for remote jobs.

      I've worked from home as a programmer for the past 4 years, plus a few months. If you can effectively work from home (e.g., don't get distracted by odd jobs around the house or have too many other at-home distractions), then nothing beats it.

    2. Re:I've been over it for years by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm in my late 30's and never made a drivers license, and one of my reasons is that driving a car just to get from X to Y, especially when done daily for commute, is a waste of time. Using public transportation I am free to make use of the time as I see fit. It's also healthier, because there's always some walking involved to move to the stations.
      Of course I can afford that, living in an area of Europe that is very well connected with public transportation, I really feel like owning a car is unnecessary. I realize not everyone is so fortunate.

      But the bigger reason why I reject cars is that I fundamentally disagree with the car culture: that expectation of having ultra-mobility, and what it has done to our cities and landscapes. Cars are expensive, noisy, they stink, produce a large amount of waste to operate and when they are discarded, are bad for health and the environment. Our cities are designed around roads for cars, grey tarmac everywhere that takes up so much space, flattens the natural soil, animal and plant life. Just for the cars to be able to get everywhere.
      Our whole economy is wrapped around this car culture and supplying it with sufficient oil, mostly by buying it from the dictatorships in the most unstable areas of the world.

      Not to mention the huge inefficiency of the whole setup. Most cars move over a ton of weight around just to transport one or two persons.

      Thankfully people are starting to rethink, and thanks to Tesla, electric is on the move, which will at least relieve some of the issues I have with the car culture.

    3. Re:I've been over it for years by DogDude · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%. I'm actively trying to move from the US to Europe primarily for this reason.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:I've been over it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The masses must not have cars; while contained to the train lines, they will never see how the bourgeois live.

    5. Re:I've been over it for years by bkmoore · · Score: 2

      I agree with you 100%. I'm actively trying to move from the US to Europe primarily for this reason.

      I lived in Europe for almost 10 years, but not for this reason. Public transit in Germany, where I lived, actually sucks. Don't get me wrong, it's great compared to the U.S., but that's not saying much. Trains were way overpriced, almost always overfilled, and often cancelled. Local transit was a bus service that took almost an hour to go from work to home, even though a direct route would be 10 km, because the only bus took a very circuitous route to where I lived. I started riding a bike to work instead, but that's not always possible in the Winter. After five years of public transit I had had enough. I would have bought a second car for commuting to work, but my job didn't pay enough to afford both a home and a second car, so I left instead and returned to the U.S.

    6. Re:I've been over it for years by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I'm in my late 30's and never made a drivers license

      I take it you don't have kids? Even the last buddy of mine who never got his license finally succumbed at age 30 because with three kids the schedule just didn't add up anymore, even though his wife drove. I've taken public transport to work more years than I've driven and not always owned one either, but being stuck without the possibility to borrow/share/rent/lease one and depend on taxis and public transport for everything that would be terrible. I mean I could obviously manage like if I for some medical reason couldn't drive, but for me that'd be a huge problem to work around. A problem that was vastly easier solved getting my license than trying to work out of a lifetime of non-driving, that's kinda the nice thing you do it once and there's no real upkeep. I got mine as quickly as I could and I'd do it all over again.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:I've been over it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in my late 30's and never made a drivers license, and one of my reasons is that driving a car just to get from X to Y, especially when done daily for commute, is a waste of time. Using public transportation I am free to make use of the time as I see fit. It's also healthier, because there's always some walking involved to move to the stations.
      Of course I can afford that, living in an area of Europe that is very well connected with public transportation, I really feel like owning a car is unnecessary. I realize not everyone is so fortunate.

      But the bigger reason why I reject cars is that I fundamentally disagree with the car culture: that expectation of having ultra-mobility, and what it has done to our cities and landscapes. Cars are expensive, noisy, they stink, produce a large amount of waste to operate and when they are discarded, are bad for health and the environment. Our cities are designed around roads for cars, grey tarmac everywhere that takes up so much space, flattens the natural soil, animal and plant life. Just for the cars to be able to get everywhere.
      Our whole economy is wrapped around this car culture and supplying it with sufficient oil, mostly by buying it from the dictatorships in the most unstable areas of the world.

      Not to mention the huge inefficiency of the whole setup. Most cars move over a ton of weight around just to transport one or two persons.

      Thankfully people are starting to rethink, and thanks to Tesla, electric is on the move, which will at least relieve some of the issues I have with the car culture.

      hehe I'm your arch-nemesis then.. I love cars.. as an engineer I was able to afford to build both a gasser and a ratrod. I drive them all the time, sometimes even to work. love the smell, love the feel and working on them.. the next scheduled project is going to be a Rock Crawler or an armored military restoration, not sure which yet.

    8. Re:I've been over it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hate to burst your bubble and inform you how Europe obtains ALL of its natural gas from Russia. Americans have natural gas fields in their back yards, enough for at least several hundred years.

    9. Re:I've been over it for years by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Here's a secret: it's always like that. I think people, especially Americans who don't have much experience, imagine that public transport will magically take them between any two points cheaper, faster and more comfortably than a car. Usually you'd be happy to get any two of those. Outside of urban areas not even that.

      Like even in Hong Kong, which you'd think was small enough, public transport is great around Kowloon or HK Island but for something like Sai Kung you'd probably want a car already.

      This is not to shit on public transport though, I think it's very important to have a decent system (and for everyone else to use it :D) to reduce congestion and protect the environment and help people who aren't able to drive themselves like children, disabled or poor people.

    10. Re:I've been over it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hate to burst your bubble and inform you how Europe obtains ALL of its natural gas from Russia.

      Well, then it's a good thing that is not true.

    11. Re:I've been over it for years by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      hehe I'm your arch-nemesis then.. I love cars.. .

      I totally get it when people like cars. Cars can be beautiful, amazing pieces of machinery. I just think they are too ubiquitous and prevalent in our society. A lot of people who own cars and use them to drive every day, could probably also do without if they were willing to sacrifice some of the convenience.

    12. Re:I've been over it for years by mrvan · · Score: 1

      Here's a secret: it's always like that. I think people, especially Americans who don't have much experience, imagine that public transport will magically take them between any two points cheaper, faster and more comfortably than a car. Usually you'd be happy to get any two of those. Outside of urban areas not even that.

      Like even in Hong Kong, which you'd think was small enough, public transport is great around Kowloon or HK Island but for something like Sai Kung you'd probably want a car already.

      This is not to shit on public transport though, I think it's very important to have a decent system (and for everyone else to use it :D) to reduce congestion and protect the environment and help people who aren't able to drive themselves like children, disabled or poor people.

      Living in Europe (and having lived in HK) I'm afraid this is mostly true. Public transportation is almost never optimal because it does not follow the optimal route and doesn't stop where you need it to and/or stops where you don't need it to. Advantages are of course lower energy use per person-mile and less effort required while riding.

      I take it as a mark of civilization that I have public transport options available to me, both trams to get around town and trains to go to neighbouring towns, but in my commute I cherish my private transportation. In my case, that's 30 minutes on a bike, which is most of my regular exercise*. The nice thing is that e-bikes (going up to 30 mph now) are making a bike commute a more plausible alternative for people living up to say 20 miles out.

      However, a perfect form of transportation for non-local travel is some form of electric self-driving car powered by fairy dust. Until that time, public cars and public transport both have drawbacks...

      * and yes it's fine in winter too, the poster somewhere above is just a sissy :)

    13. Re:I've been over it for years by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      I take it you don't have kids?

      I'm starting to get those little critters now. It's true, to move an entire family around, not to mention all the required baggage, especially for babies, cars are a huge convenience and a relief. My wife owns a car and drives us around on more far-away trips, like visiting family, so I admit even I am not completely carless. I'm not saying we should completely ditch cars and the associated benefits of mobility. There are situations when cars are almost mandatory. But I'll just repeat what I just said in a different reply:
      I think cars are too ubiquitous and prevalent in our society. A lot of people who own cars and use them to drive every day, could probably also do without if they were willing to sacrifice some of the convenience.
      For those occasions a car is really needed, people could hire them... car sharing... another trend that is fortunately also in development.

    14. Re:I've been over it for years by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

      That you don't find the same value in car culture makes you a very small minority... To me the vehicle is the ultimate expression of my freedom - I can hop in and drive anywhere in the vast country I live in without restriction. I have, many times, over 200,000km in my vehicle. I will agree it's inefficient for daily commute, and I use transit as well (zero of those 200km are from commuting), but owning a vehicle and the infrastructure we've built for vehicle travel is arguably our what makes us truly free.

    15. Re:I've been over it for years by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Something to consider, jobs for life means being able to live close enough to walk to work. Disposable labour means, public transport becomes unworkable, let alone walking to work.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    16. Re:I've been over it for years by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      This could change radically if companies that are in information-oriented jobs, such as design, graphic arts, and programming, would get off their butts and gear up for remote work, which is quite possible and even saves a lot of money (not to mention transportation, lost time, and pollution).

      I've worked that way for 10 years. Unfortunately, too many companies still want to waste time having people relocate to a suburb, miles away from work, and commute each way. An hour each way = 10 hour days instead of 8, or 12 hour days rather than 10.

    17. Re:I've been over it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is the reason for you to move, choose the area you move to very carefully. Public transport availablility varies vastly, even within countries.

      In Hamburg, Germany, the public transport system seems very nice, at least within the main parts of the city, I don't know about the fringes and the satellite settlements. Where I live it's pretty grotty. There is a system, so if you really can't have a car you can get by, but it's a major hassle, especially if you have to travel to somewhere else than a major traffic hub. A journey of 15min by car can quickly become a 1.5h to 2h affair if you have to go somewhere the system isn't really set up for.

      Likewise in the UK. If you live in London or say a place like Cambridge, you are arguably better off without a car, depending on where exactly you live. More rural or even just not quite so centrally located towns or cities even and you are SOL.

    18. Re:I've been over it for years by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      I'm not denying the value in our car culture that you describe. Mobility is always a good thing. I just think that the cost of having that freedom is too high, especially when you have alternatives available.
      It is now becoming evident that we are paying the long-term cost of car culture in one way or another, due to all the fuel we are burning and the consequential effects on our climate.

    19. Re:I've been over it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have children and I don't need a car. Luckily, we live in a city and everything we need is in walking distance or easily accessible by public transport. Luckily, our children are not handicapped, so they can walk and travel by PT with us. My parents didn't have a car either, and I still live. It may be a problem on suburbs, but suburbs are product of car culture. In the future, we should have fewer suburbs and more self-sustainable villages.

    20. Re:I've been over it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you very much for making a difference

    21. Re:I've been over it for years by gdm · · Score: 1

      There comes a point when your lost time becomes significant too: http://www.mrmoneymustache.com...

  3. Terrible Stop Lights by nwaack · · Score: 1

    It doesn't help that there's now a stop light or roundabout at nearly every intersection that gets more than 20 cars a day. For example, the city I live in put a stop light IN THE MIDDLE OF A STEEP HILL because there's a small factory on the, otherwise completely empty, side street. So even though there's only cross traffic for about an hour each day, the light continues all day. I'm just waiting for this winter when someone goes sliding through the light and T-bones someone. I hope both parties sue the city.

    1. Re:Terrible Stop Lights by Solandri · · Score: 1

      A big reason for this is because cities don't want to foot the bill for installing a light at a street for a new development. So they frequently negotiate for the developer to pay for purchasing and installing the traffic signal at the street (it becomes part of the cost for the development project). The developer does so but times the light to be most favorable for people going to/from their development project, to the detriment of through-traffic. So if they install a light for a new road leading to a housing development, any car arriving at the left turn lane to head into the development will cause opposing traffic to immediately get a red light, so the car making the left turn barely has to wait. Likewise for someone leaving the development - any car on the leaving side of the road immediately triggers a red light for all cross traffic, so the people leaving the development don't have to wait.

    2. Re:Terrible Stop Lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feh. Idiots who can't drive don't deserve to drive. Can't stop in the middle of a hill in winter? Sheesh. If you have both hills & snow, you use snow tires. Simple as that.

    3. Re:Terrible Stop Lights by nwaack · · Score: 1

      Feh. Idiots who can't drive don't deserve to drive. Can't stop in the middle of a hill in winter? Sheesh. If you have both hills & snow, you use snow tires. Simple as that.

      And idiots who've never seen a REAL winter storm shouldn't make idiotic comments about driving in them. Trying to stop a vehicle going any speed on a steep hill in the middle of an ice storm is impossible regardless of size or type of tires.

    4. Re:Terrible Stop Lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago in Austin, I was working for TXDOT and became involved in a discussion about the Capital of Texas Highway and the fact that it was supposed to be a limited access highway, but housing and business developers had put in lights every few hundred feet as traffic congestion increased, exponentially increasing overall driving time for anyone who used the highway as a thoroughfare.

      Our recommendation was to build frontage and merge lanes to the highway and reduce the number of lights by 2/3rds, which would allow traffic to keep moving and keep the congestion to the frontage a merge lanes. The overall feeling from the developers was that this only favored through traffic while inconveniencing the denizens of the communities they were building.

      In the end decision was to continue to add more lights, to the point now where if you live on the south end of the highway (Bee Caves or Rollingwood), and have to commute to the north end for work (North Austin, Domain or Great Hills area), your commute will be 45 minutes to an hour for less than 15 miles of distance.

    5. Re: Terrible Stop Lights by DatbeDank · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Lived in Cleveland, Buffalo, and New England. I know real winters. Snow tires trump any vehicle add ons like all wheel drive any day.

      I own an all wheel drive jeep and I still put snow tires on each winter. If you're living in a place with snow and you only own tri-seasons (ahem all seasons) you're an idiot.

    6. Re: Terrible Stop Lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Anchorage, as long as you have a good set of studded snow tires you'll be fine even on hills.

    7. Re: Terrible Stop Lights by nwaack · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Lived in Cleveland, Buffalo, and New England. I know real winters.

      Oooh, you sound like a real man. Please let me groom your manly beard while I stroke your manhood.

      Where I live we had a 30+" snowstorm just last April. I'm very familiar with winters, you arrogant douche. Unless you have studs on those snow tires (illegal) you aren't stopping your car on a steep hill covered in glare ice. You just aren't. Don't even pretend that you can. Snow tires are great but can only do so much...it's called physics, you should look into it sometime.

    8. Re: Terrible Stop Lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's called physics, you should look into it sometime.

      Fuck off and learn some social skills. The guy never said anything about ice. He was referencing snow. Nothing that he said was incorrect, you just seem to be arguing for the sake of arguing. Go away...

    9. Re: Terrible Stop Lights by Dr_Terminus · · Score: 1

      What about states where they're not permitted (MN, WI, MI, IL)? What do you propose then?

  4. Driving is fun by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

    But commuting sucks. It just becomes a routine you have to do like brushing your teeth and taking out the garbage. Heavy traffic of course just makes it worse. Sadly, as good as public transport can be for a lot of reasons, it's not much fun either and in many cases won't save you any time.

    I now live 10 minutes walk to the office and it still kind of sucks when it's very cold and/or rainy. On those days I can just stay in and work from home though :D

    1. Re:Driving is fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Driving is a job for a chauffeur or soon to be an AI.
      'Fun' is for suicidal idiots.
      It's also not a sport.

    2. Re:Driving is fun by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I now live 10 minutes walk to the office and it still kind of sucks when it's very cold and/or rainy.

      Found the Millennial!

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  5. Not all by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

    It takes about 15 minutes to work (I have to drop off the kid) and 10 minutes home, so about 25 minutes per day * days per week * 50 weeks ~ 105hours. So not quite.

    On the plus side my car is nearly 50 years old, stick shift, and fun as heck to drive. So the drive can be by the seat of your pants which can be pretty enjoyable. There is about a three mile stretch where the road curves back and forth several times that most people don't like to take. That stretch alone is a joy to take at 10-15 mph above the speed limit. On the way home there is about a 1 1/2 mile street that is straight as an arrow with no lights or stop signs and very little traffic, ie pure fun to rake the shifter through.

    Of course YMMV.

    1. Re:Not all by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      On the plus side my car is nearly 50 years old, stick shift, and fun as heck to drive. So the drive can be by the seat of your pants which can be pretty enjoyable. There is about a three mile stretch where the road curves back and forth several times that most people don't like to take. That stretch alone is a joy to take at 10-15 mph above the speed limit. On the way home there is about a 1 1/2 mile street that is straight as an arrow with no lights or stop signs and very little traffic, ie pure fun to rake the shifter through.

      Sadly, for some reason, a lot of people, particularly the younger ones, don't think of a car as something that can be 'fun' or 'exciting'...it is merely a commodity, or necessary evil to get from A->B.

      Not me...I've owned nothing but 2 seat sports cars all my life...I worked and saved before HS so I could get one in HS, and have saved and traded up since then (kinda like I did with my stereo)....

      I too love to hit the gas and down/up shift on stretches of road when no one is around.

      But sadly, not as many people appreciate that anymore.

      Hell, it is getting nigh impossible to find a new car with a manual transmission anymore.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:Not all by bob4u2c · · Score: 1

      It is getting hard to find old ones as well. Those who like stick don't want to give them up.

      Like I've told my wife, if I wreck my car I'll just fix. If I total the car, I'll take what I can from mine, transplant to a new less wrecked car and drive that. I'm either giving my car to my kids or dying in it.

    3. Re:Not all by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is an interesting point...

      I used to hate driving. But after saying, "Y'know, if I'm going to spend an hour-and-a-half a day in my car, five days per week, I'm going to get a car that I don't mind being in." So I went and bought a nice car. And I didn't hate driving anymore.

      There are plenty of people who look at a car as a necessary evil--"I just need something that will get me from Point A to Point B." They buy that and then they complain that it isn't comfortable to drive for two hours. Well, maybe you should have included that in your requirements.

    4. Re:Not all by tepples · · Score: 1

      I worked and saved before HS so I could get one in HS

      Was that before states started tightening their child labor laws to shut out children under 16 from more and more duties?

    5. Re:Not all by Dorianny · · Score: 2

      A manual-gearbox used to perform better, get better gas mileage cost less and be more reliable. All of this has changed with modern automatic transmissions. About the only reason left for manual is the "fun factor," which is only really fun in long stretches of empty road, stuck in traffic it just adds to the stress

    6. Re:Not all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the plus side my car is nearly 50 years old, stick shift, and fun as heck to drive. So the drive can be by the seat of your pants which can be pretty enjoyable. There is about a three mile stretch where the road curves back and forth several times that most people don't like to take. That stretch alone is a joy to take at 10-15 mph above the speed limit. On the way home there is about a 1 1/2 mile street that is straight as an arrow with no lights or stop signs and very little traffic, ie pure fun to rake the shifter through.

      Sadly, for some reason, a lot of people, particularly the younger ones, don't think of a car as something that can be 'fun' or 'exciting'...it is merely a commodity, or necessary evil to get from A->B.

      Not me...I've owned nothing but 2 seat sports cars all my life...I worked and saved before HS so I could get one in HS, and have saved and traded up since then (kinda like I did with my stereo)....

      I too love to hit the gas and down/up shift on stretches of road when no one is around.

      But sadly, not as many people appreciate that anymore.

      Hell, it is getting nigh impossible to find a new car with a manual transmission anymore.

      Agreed. I drive a manual for that very reason. I think new cars are so boring. They are all tech and no soul. Very nany feeling with all it's safety features, which may be good but sure are boring.

    7. Re:Not all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, for some reason, a lot of people, particularly the younger ones, don't think of a car as something that can be 'fun' or 'exciting'...it is merely a commodity, or necessary evil to get from A->B.

      Why sadly?

      A lot of the 'driving should be fun' comes from car commercials.
      In real life it is a good thing that younger people don't think of cars as toys.

      Maybe a am a bit colored by walking past a place where the parents puts flowers by the road every year, but it is not like a lot of lives wouldn't be saved if all kids treated cars as tools rather than toys.

      Also, the whole 'revving the engine for no reason'-culture has to go.
      Car 'enthusiasts' seems to be incapable of understanding that the reason people looks is the same as when some junkie screams and shits himself in public.

    8. Re:Not all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Was that before states started tightening their child labor laws to shut out children under 16 from more and more duties?

      Could also be farm work, that is still mostly open for younger (I did alott of that.) Also could be like the Donald, who "worked" for his dad, and was a millionaire at 8.

    9. Re:Not all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FTA:

      What’s more, millennials carry an inordinate part of the $1.3 trillion in student debt in the United States, and that influences their decisions.

      Sometimes it's kinda hard to buy a nice car.

    10. Re:Not all by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But sadly, not as many people appreciate that anymore.

      No one ever appreciated you using the open road as your own personal speedway. Why the hell would I own a sports car when I could just rent one when I hit the racetrack? Sure as heck not to sit in traffic, or to pick up IKEA furniture.

    11. Re:Not all by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Was that before states started tightening their child labor laws to shut out children under 16 from more and more duties?

      Well, I started out pretty young, mowing neighborhood yards, and baby sitting....and when 16yrs, I got my first W2 job, washing dishes at a medium upscale restaurant, and worked my way up from there.

      I've pretty much had a job since then all through HS, college, grad school...etc.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    12. Re:Not all by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It is an interesting point...

      I used to hate driving. But after saying, "Y'know, if I'm going to spend an hour-and-a-half a day in my car, five days per week, I'm going to get a car that I don't mind being in." So I went and bought a nice car. And I didn't hate driving anymore.

      There are plenty of people who look at a car as a necessary evil--"I just need something that will get me from Point A to Point B." They buy that and then they complain that it isn't comfortable to drive for two hours. Well, maybe you should have included that in your requirements.

      Once you're past the level of a twenty seven year old rust bucket that you're scared will catch fire when you touch the brakes, all reasonably modern cars are fine to drive for a couple of hours at a time.

      The problem is with a two hour each way commute, not the car you're in.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Not all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the plus side my car is nearly 50 years old, stick shift, and fun as heck to drive. So the drive can be by the seat of your pants which can be pretty enjoyable. There is about a three mile stretch where the road curves back and forth several times that most people don't like to take. That stretch alone is a joy to take at 10-15 mph above the speed limit. On the way home there is about a 1 1/2 mile street that is straight as an arrow with no lights or stop signs and very little traffic, ie pure fun to rake the shifter through.

      Sadly, for some reason, a lot of people, particularly the younger ones, don't think of a car as something that can be 'fun' or 'exciting'...it is merely a commodity, or necessary evil to get from A->B.

      Not me...I've owned nothing but 2 seat sports cars all my life...I worked and saved before HS so I could get one in HS, and have saved and traded up since then (kinda like I did with my stereo)....

      I too love to hit the gas and down/up shift on stretches of road when no one is around.

      But sadly, not as many people appreciate that anymore.

      Hell, it is getting nigh impossible to find a new car with a manual transmission anymore.

      I used to be the same but you have to live in an area where there are open stretches of road. There is no driving for fun where I am (Denver Metro) at really any time of the day. There is almost always pretty thick traffic, even if it is moving, and never a time when the roads are empty. At 11PM, 4AM, 2PM, or any other time there are still at least a dozen of cars around me and I don't even live in the worst areas. You'll hear people say all the time that Denver traffic isn't as bad as .

      You MIGHT be able to find something open if you go far enough into the mountains, which can be pretty, or plains but spending an hour in traffic (or more on the weekend) kind of kills the urge to drive more. And there's no helping the commute, which is what 99% of driving is. I have a super flexible schedule and can basically choose when I come and go but at best that just puts me in moderate traffic instead of severe. Sadly, driving for fun die years ago.

    14. Re:Not all by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      "About the only reason..." I take it you don't live where there is snow...

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
    15. Re:Not all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly?!?!?!? to paraphrase your post from my "younger ones" perspective:

      "I'm a conservative which means I prefer to waste money and energy and use the most extremely fiscally irresponsible method of transportation I can find. My idea of fun is wasting expensive petro-energy while sitting passively in a seat while using none of my own strength or energy. Due to my love for petro-wars (in which the 'young ones' have been fighting and dying for almost two decades) I find it sad that people who are younger than me are more mature and responsible than I am with their health, money, time, and energy consumption. I could care less that 10 times as many people are killed by cars in the USA every year than were killed in the 9/11 attacks(which were used as justification for aforementioned petro-wars in which the 'younger ones' generation have been fighting and dying for close to two decades, without bitching and moaning like these spoiled baby boomers with their lust for breathing poison air, covering everything with asphalt, and generally shitting on everything wherever they go.) People who do things like ride bicycles that improve their health, reduce traffic congestion, are extremely fun(because y'know using their bodies to move fast and experience g's on tight corners while engaging in aerobic exercise that triggers the release of endorphins and anandamide that make you feel good) make no sense to me. They should be sitting in a drive-through at McDonnalds clogging up their arteries, letting their muscles atrophy, and driving up the cost of healthcare after wearing down the inefficient roads for which my taxes go to pay. "

      I look forward to when people like you are too old to drive, or alternatively have all passed away so that the 'young ones' who actually bother to think about stuff can take over, hopefully before people like you have succeeded in turning everything to shit.

    16. Re:Not all by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      About the only reason left for manual is the "fun factor," which is only really fun in long stretches of empty road, stuck in traffic it just adds to the stress

      Actually, I find it fun all the time, I like it in city driving too......

      I'd really not want a sports car without a manual transmission, it takes something away from it.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    17. Re:Not all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being able to afford a luxury vehicle is something most people in this country will not be able to justify. I'm glad you can afford the cost but I don't think many people set out to buy something they will actively hate every day?

  6. Public transportation does save time by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sadly, as good as public transport can be for a lot of reasons, it's not much fun either and in many cases won't save you any time.

    I can't do anything else while I'm driving. I can do all sorts of stuff (work, relax, etc.) while on public transit.

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Public transportation does save time by djinn6 · · Score: 2

      Still, if the traffic sets you back 1 hour, but public transit sets you back 2.5 hours, most people will drive. There's simply not enough hours in the day to devote 5 hours of it to the commute.

    2. Re:Public transportation does save time by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even here in the Netherlands, with a very dense and well managed public transport network versus congested roads, commuting by car is still faster than public transport in many cases, and a lot of people prefer to spend less time commuting over taking longer but being able to work or read. Public transport is great when you have an efficient single leg journey with a short-ish distance to walk or cycle at either end. But it starts to suck hard once you have to change lines: the chance of missing your connection adds stress to the journey. Even worse when you're on a crowded train: good luck working, relaxing or even just reading a book in that case.

      There's a psychological aspect to it as well. As soon as you get in your car, the workday's done in your mind. With public transport, the day ends only when you're at your front door.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Public transportation does save time by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      And in my city, you'll have plenty of time to do those other things, because the transit system assumes all trips are going downtown, so it takes 3x as long to get where you are actually going than if you just drive.

      I can do all that stuff you mention with the time I save by not using the shitty transit system here.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    4. Re:Public transportation does save time by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Let me guess. You live in Los Angeles. That's one of my beefs with the transit system here.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:Public transportation does save time by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's where driverless subway/rail systems can really improve things as well. Instead of a "train" of 10 cars coming every 10 minutes, you can have a single car (or pair of cars) stopping every minute or two. You no longer need to spread the costs of a motorman across 10 rail cars for the system to make sense.

    6. Re:Public transportation does save time by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, if you have to drive 300 minutes every day to get to work then you really need to move closer to work. This is a major cut into your life time, your bank account, everything.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    7. Re:Public transportation does save time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never consider my workday over when I get in the car. I also factor in what my drive time would pay me in overtime plus the national maximum reimbursement rate for vehicle mileage to any company for which I would consider working . This helps me determine the true Cost and Pay rate that also takes into account quality of life.

      Back on topic, I'd rather spend my 35 minute commute doing anything but driving. You're right though, I'll take my 35 minute car ride over the estimated 1 hour and 45 minute bus ride with multiple transfers that I would need to take in order to get to and from work without a car.

      The transportation system should be both faster and cheaper to be successful.

    8. Re:Public transportation does save time by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Could also be Atlanta. It doesn't help that there is no unified regional transit system (though that is in the works). But if you want to go from suburb to suburb, figure on it taking half a day if it can even be done at all.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    9. Re:Public transportation does save time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't think the IRS lets you deduct mileage for "normal" commutes.

    10. Re:Public transportation does save time by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Can you really? I mean maybe you can in your particular case, but from my experience most people can't do anything other than hold onto their stuff and stare blankly into the distance. Best case you see people shitposting on facebook or looking at cat pics on their phones.

    11. Re:Public transportation does save time by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      This argument sounds good, but I didn't find it was really that true when I took public transit to and from the office.

      For starters, the commuter rail line I had to take in to the city had really spotty cellular data coverage. As it went through tunnels or through open fields, you had no service. Only once you got close to my stop did LTE start being consistent and reliable.

      When I took the metro around (DC area), they still have this ridiculous exclusive deal with Verizon wireless so they're the ONLY provider giving you cellular signal underground in the metro system. Since I have T-Mobile, again a problem. They do brag about having wi-fi at most station platforms now, but that's not going to get a lot done for you in the 5-7 minutes you might be standing there, waiting for your metro train.

      Also, at the speeds the trains all run out here? You can drive from my house to my office and get there just as fast as using mass transit. The only time that's not true is when a car accident causes a real traffic blockage that makes everyone sit in traffic for an hour, not moving, or something like that. In general, the only time savings I saw with the train over driving in was that last 10-15 minutes I might spend parking my car in a garage, often up on the 6th. level or so, and then getting from there back in to the office itself.

      These days, I always drive in because I have flexibility to work late and not worry about missing a train, and I have a trunk in the car that can hold bigger items I might need to haul around. (I have to take care of our corporate network and I've had times a large box shipped to one location, but I needed to unbox and configure the contents, and then install at a different office. That's terrible, trying to carry all that stuff on the Metro.)

    12. Re:Public transportation does save time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Chicago, all train lines radiate out from The Loop (which is named for the shape that the original subway and elevated train lines make around the center of downtown Chicago.) This is because they were designed for people who worked downtown and lived in the suburbs along the original spokes.

    13. Re:Public transportation does save time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it's a big word, but did you see ''notional''?

    14. Re:Public transportation does save time by tepples · · Score: 1

      the transit system assumes all trips are going downtown

      Let me guess. You live in Los Angeles.

      Citilink in Fort Wayne, Indiana, also runs a hub and spoke arrangement, with all but three lines meeting at the downtown transfer station.

    15. Re:Public transportation does save time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't work while standing. Can't work while keeping an eye on the homeless dude who might knife me. (They got a different guy instead, so mission accomplished.) Can't work while trying to move to a location that doesn't reek of body odor. Can't work now that I drive, there is no fucking way I will ride transit now that I can afford not to. Duh.

    16. Re: Public transportation does save time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can... You can... Everything is you can.. do you mean ME? Oh I can, if I spend $billions for those dream systems. Gee, just imagine, $billions equals lotsa new roads, and FREE CARS for everyone.

      Is that something you have actually done? No? Well then stop talking out of your ass.

      Asshole.

    17. Re:Public transportation does save time by Kevin108 · · Score: 0

      Public transit? Gross. Who wants to be locked in a vehicle with a bunch of sick, dirty, loud strangers?

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    18. Re:Public transportation does save time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no...I did see "national"

    19. Re:Public transportation does save time by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Even here in the Netherlands, with a very dense and well managed public transport network versus congested roads, commuting by car is still faster than public transport in many cases, and a lot of people prefer to spend less time commuting over taking longer but being able to work or read.

      Of course it's faster. That is universal except for dedicated services in mega-cities. e.g. In London last week I had the option of catching a train to waterloo in 35min or driving for 1h, and it wasn't even peak hour yet.

      And let's talk about your country for a moment:
      I would like to see you drive from Utrecht to Rotterdam faster than the train can get you there during peak hour.
      I would like to see you drive from Amsterdam to Rotterdam faster than the ICD can get you there at midnight when you have perfectly free roads.

      The speed case is not universal, however the GP's point was that your *time* may be valuable to you. Given the choice between 30min on the road or 50min on the train, a lot of people choose the train unless they have some form of offloading from the driving activity (e.g. carpooling). Driving for 30min sucks when you could be ranting on Slashdot instead.

      And finally I'm incredibly disapointed that you as someone in the Netherlands would come up with this line and then talk about psychological aspects. The Netherlands of all places where public transport for commuting is incredibly well utilised. My wife just went for a girl's weekend away in Flevoland with 7 of her work colleagues. They had to hire a car since between the 8 of them they had 1 car owner and 5 people with drivers licenses. Everyone else not only commuted via public transport, but actually spend most of their daily lives the way Dutch people do, with a bike and a train.

      With public transport, the day ends only when you're at your front door.

      Put your work laptop away when on the train, and pull out a book.

    20. Re:Public transportation does save time by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I would like to see you drive from Utrecht to Rotterdam faster than the train can get you there during peak hour.

      I drive this 2-3 times a week (Utrecht to Rotterdam in the afternoon). In a lot of cases I can plan my trip outside rush hour, but when I can't, the trip takes at most about 1 hour. The Intercity is 37 minutes, plus 8 minutes by subway, plus a 10 minute walk, and a 20 minute bus ride at the other end. Not allowing any extra time for changing lines. The train is pretty fast... if your journey is station to station (I used to commute like that for a while, the train took me pretty much door to door and it was great)

      I would like to see you drive from Amsterdam to Rotterdam faster than the ICD can get you there at midnight when you have perfectly free roads.

      Same deal: door to door (assuming I leave from Amsterdam Central Station) that takes just over an hour by car or train.

      We do have good public transport and it's well used, but don't think that's how most people travel. Plenty of train lines are already overcrowded and it would take maybe 5-10% of car drivers deciding to commute by train to completely overload the system in rush hour. They are improving the capacity with longer trains, closer-spaced signals and some clever automation, but that only goes so far. Having one car owner in a group of 8 people is exceptional except in a few cities like Amsterdam or Utrecht, but in the Hague or especially Rotterdam, you'll find that most people own one. The "Dutch life" of living close enough to work to go by bike is an unattainable dream for the vast majority.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    21. Re:Public transportation does save time by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There's a psychological aspect to it as well. As soon as you get in your car, the workday's done in your mind. With public transport, the day ends only when you're at your front door.

      I think that must depend on your own psychology. I find commuting time by car is the same as commuting time by train, except that in a car I can't doze off for a few minutes if I'm tired, or read a book.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    22. Re:Public transportation does save time by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      plus 8 minutes by subway, plus a 10 minute walk, and a 20 minute bus ride at the other end

      Subway? Walk? Busride? Are you Dutch or an expat? Dump a bicycle at the station like every other Dutchman :-) Seriously though it takes 20-30minutes to cycle from central station to any of the Rotterdam town edges (Europoort-Rotterdam excluded).

      The "Dutch life" of living close enough to work

      That I disagree with again. If anything The Netherlands seems to be typified by living in a different city to where you work.

      Okay I can't criticize, technically I'm working in Germany at the moment.

    23. Re:Public transportation does save time by kbrannen · · Score: 1

      Dallas is this way too. East to west lines are non-existent, so if you're at a station in the northwest of the city and want to get to a station in the northeast, expect to take 2 hours to go downtown first. Unless you're going downtown or somewhere on the leg you're already on, it's better to drive even if traffic is slow.

  7. I hate cars by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    I didn't have one in high school. By the time I did it was an expensive nuisance and constant source of stress mostly used to get me to work.

    That said if I had one in high school (along with the increase in social standing that comes with one) my opinion would probably be very different.

    Meanwhile I drive home against traffic each day and it's terrifying to me how bad things are. Traffic will be backed up several miles on surface streets. Freeways are at least a half mile. Meanwhile all those cars are spewing toxins and we're wasting gas and getting into wars we can't afford to feed our hungry engines.

    Why do we live like this?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to bike or walk or take the bus to work..... my job forced me to get my license and a car. I hate every second of being in that car, even when im off doing the things i enjoy.

    2. Re:I hate cars by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Why do we live like this?

      If you have viable alternatives, I'm sure we'd all love to hear them.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:I hate cars by PPH · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why do we live like this?

      Because owning your own flexible mode of transportation gives you the option of bypassing all of the crappy businesses that transit-bound people are stuck with. I don't mind taking the bus or riding a bike. But once the local stores figure that they have a significant captive market in their little urban villages, their prices go up and their quality goes down. While all the carless people are stuck shopping within a raduis dictated by how far they are willing to lug groceries on a bus, I'll just jump in my car and head out to the big box store in the suburbs.

      Politicians enamored with their socialist Central Planning Bureaus hate people like me.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:I hate cars by El+Cubano · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why do we live like this?

      Because, on the whole, people like cars and governments like (gas) tax revenue.

      Public transit takes both of those things away. Electric cars help with the pollution, but costs government the gas tax revenues, hence the sometimes "innovative" proposals you are starting to hear about how to tax electric car owners for their utilization of road infrastructure.

      Still, in practically every city, outside of the places where there is simply no possible way to increase road capacity, people will prefer increased road capacity to any public transport solution.

    5. Re:I hate cars by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, you probably go shopping for groceries once a week at best and have to buy stuff that can be stored for a long time. I just use a shop on my way and go almost every day there so my groceries are actually fresh.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [I viewed my car as] an expensive nuisance and constant source of stress.

      That's basically how my mom sees computers/phones. She's computer illiterate, and her phone sucks.

      Id wager to guess you were in a similar situation as my mom, but with cars; i.e., you didn't know how to repair it, and your car sucked/wasn't fun.

      Your mind may already be made up, but if you to see what all the fuss is about, try buying a cheap, small, older car that has potential (either in the performance or looks department) and where you can "wrench on" (i.e., repair) yourself. Make improvements per your taste. Do repairs. Quite a bit of fun how some small chances can really affect the look/feel of the car.

    7. Re:I hate cars by PPH · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you probably go shopping for groceries once a week at best

      Maybe for major re-stocking at the local Costco. But I do stop by and pick up fresh fruit and whatnot almost every day. With a car, it's a 10 minute side trip. Too many people living in urban villages have no such option. It's junk food at the corner bodega or hours on the bus (at which point it's not really 'fresh') . The USA doesn't have traditions like a neighborhood bakery or butcher. We do have some nice farm fruit stands. But these are usually out of town a ways (good luck without a car). The bodega owners keep them out.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:I hate cars by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      It's one of those questions I always ask people: "Have you looked into alternatives? Tried them out?"

      Many times, using the car is a path of least resistance. "Yes, I could take the bus or the train and maybe bike the rest of the way, but that just seems like too much work and, in the mornings, I just don't want that hassle."

      There's also the expense. "I have a $400 a month car payment and you want me to spend $100 a month on bus/train fare just to do the same thing I could do with my car?"

      My roommate was convinced that there was just absolutely no way she could take the bus to work. It would take too long, cost too much, be a pain in the ass. Then her company started offering to subsidize people who did not drive to work. So she took a little time and figured that, if she took the bus, it'd take her an extra 20 minutes to get home and it would cost her about $2. This versus the $7-8 a day she was spending on gas (not to mention wear-and-tear, oil changes, etc.).

      Once she had a little bit of incentive to look, she figured out that it wasn't quite so impossible.

      I'd like to see a "Don't Drive To Work" day. Give people a chance to check out the alternatives. Yeah, maybe those alternatives aren't viable. But at least you tried them and you know they aren't viable. Because it's pretty easy to just say, "Naw, I couldn't do that."

    9. Re:I hate cars by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      I used to live in a situation where I had a 30-45 minute commute to work by car. I lived right next to a bus stop and my office had a bus stop next to it. The estimated time for a public transit trip from my home to work was over 2-1/2 hours. This is metro Atlanta and unless your commute is within the city or from the suburbs to the city, good luck. I lived in one suburb and worked in another and the two transit systems were only connected downtown.

      Now I live out in the cow fields and have a 30ish minute commute. But the urbanization is quickly approaching... A Wal-Mart went up last year and it's only going to get more developed from there.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    10. Re:I hate cars by dasunt · · Score: 3, Informative

      governments like (gas) tax revenue.

      Gas tax comes nowhere near to paying for the cost of building and maintaining our streets and roads.

    11. Re:I hate cars by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      I finally invested in a used Tesla, so I don't worry about buying gasoline anymore.

      There are actually a lot of electric car options out there now, even on the used market, so you can no longer really say they're "un-affordable". I mean, not unless your budget only includes beater cars under $2,000 or something.

      I regularly see electric Smart4Two cars for sale, going for as little as $6,000-ish each, often with low mileage. If you're single and just need a vehicle for a work commute, it'll get the job done, even if it's tiny and you think it looks goofy.

      If you can deal with something more like a typical monthly car payment on a new vehicle? A Nissan Leaf or Chevy Bolt would be reasonable options. So far, you can still get that Federal tax credit of $7,500 back on one of those purchases too.

      If you really get stressed out by driving and dislike the whole thing? Then sure, don't buy a car and don't drive. This is the age of services like Uber and Lyft, making it even easier to avoid owning a vehicle. But I've always been kind of a car enthusiast and I guess I'm not ready to let go completely of the freedoms that come with owning one you can just get in at any time, and go anywhere you like. No worries about timetables or relying on someone else....

    12. Re:I hate cars by tlhIngan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do we live like this?

      Because, on the whole, people like cars and governments like (gas) tax revenue.

      Public transit takes both of those things away. Electric cars help with the pollution, but costs government the gas tax revenues, hence the sometimes "innovative" proposals you are starting to hear about how to tax electric car owners for their utilization of road infrastructure.

      Still, in practically every city, outside of the places where there is simply no possible way to increase road capacity, people will prefer increased road capacity to any public transport solution.

      Actually, you can thank General Motors for the love of cars.

      Because back in the early 20th century, public transit in North America was actually.... extremely good. In any town or city, bit or small, you could get around using public transit. between horse drawn carriages to street cars it was a completely normal way to travel. Not just New York, or San Francisco, but any twon in any state.

      Of course, the Model T brought cars into the mix, but not by much - they were relatively finicky things and you still had to contend with a lot of pedestrian traffic everywhere.

      What replaced the street car was buses, which were considered high tech and advanced (since they didn't require rails). This did lead to the failure of many streetcar companies, since people flocked the novel bus that could go more places (and did) over the street car.

      General Motors came along and basically decided to buy out all the failing street car companies. They didn't replace them, just bought them up, shut them down and left it as things were. Advertised the heck out of cars giving freedom (we're still talking early 20th century here) and there you go. After the second world war, the car became the status symbol and everyone bought into it, the interstate system was developed and so on. Plus, cities spread out into suburbs designed for cars and you end up with what we have today.

      Hard to imagine, but at one time, the USA had a better public transportation system than Europe. Even today it still doesn't quite match what we had back then.

      American car culture was literally developed from advertising - just like how weddings were transformed by a few De Beers ads insisting you must have a diamond ring.

    13. Re:I hate cars by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Looks like you checked it out.

      In the case of my roommate above, for example, she discovered that there was an express bus that took her from the bus station near our house to a bus stop just down the block from where she worked. She didn't know about it until she looked--she always said that, "Oh, it would take too long." And she's right--if she had to take city busses, it would have taken an extra hour to get home (she missed the express bus one day and discovered that).

      I'll admit that taking the bus or train or whatever doesn't work everywhere. Like you said, if I live in Suburb A and I work in Suburb B, most mass transit is optimized to get you from Suburb A to City or Suburb B to City--not from Suburb A to Suburb B.

      I only ask that people look rather than the knee-jerk reaction of "Gosh, there's no way it would work for me." I mean, it's the Internet age. You can look up bus & train schedules on line. Hell, Google can tell you how to get to someplace by a certain time via mass-transit.

    14. Re:I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which adds to your time away from home. lol

    15. Re:I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Depends on how high the gas tax is. In Norway, taxes on gas & cars cost 3x what the road system costs. It is simply a big source of income for the government.

    16. Re:I hate cars by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      1. Downsize; live in a smaller space closer to work.
      2. With the new-found flexibility from downsizing, pick an area that a meaningful percentage of your trips can be walked, cycled, etc.
      3. {Don't have kids | Live close to kids' school}
      4. Live local
      5. Give up car
      5a. Rent when you need extra freedom.

    17. Re:I hate cars by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      Gas tax comes nowhere near to paying for the cost of building and maintaining our streets and roads.

      Which is something that I never said.

      What I did say, however, is that governments like the tax revenue. That is a true statement. Additionally, in places where electric vehicle adoption has been high and gas tax revenues have fallen, there have been proposals for taxing electric vehicle owners to help make up for the shortfall. That is also a true statement.

      The percentage of road maintenance which gas taxes pay for is independent of both things which I said.

    18. Re:I hate cars by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

      American car culture was literally developed from advertising - just like how weddings were transformed by a few De Beers ads insisting you must have a diamond ring.

      And if we could get the major car companies to stockpile their cars in great big warehouses to constrict supply and keep prices high, like DeBeers does with most of the diamonds pulled from the earth, we might be a great deal better off.

    19. Re:I hate cars by fatwilbur · · Score: 2

      "Why do we live like this?" Because it results in the objectively amazing, easy, and technologically advanced lives we now live. Though everyone likes to bitch and whine about how bad things are, that's just human's pessimistic brains, we were built through evolution to think in terms of worst case (for good reason). Objectively the average person now lives far better than a king of not even one hundred years ago, and it's steadily getting better too.

      I remember as a kid, only rich people went to Hawaii, now well within the reach of the middle class, as an example. Next time you eat cheese or grapes, think about how only the richest of people ate those only a few short generations ago...

    20. Re:I hate cars by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

      "groceries are actually fresh" Can you explain this? Why would you think the produce isn't then sitting just as long on your grocer's shelf versus yours? Whether you buy it today or two days later, it is still the same age since it was picked, no? I highly doubt any grocer gets fresh daily deliveries, that would be horribly inefficient and expensive.

    21. Re:I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *WE* don't. *You* do. Time to move.

    22. Re:I hate cars by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      Almost everything in American culture comes from advertising. From birthday cards to wedding rings to the "fact" that boys wear blue and girls love pink, stems not from long-standing traditions, but from successful 20th-century advertising campaigns.

    23. Re: I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually fresh... And then you negate your $$$$$ professional salary with unpaid overtime and underpaid free time with $ manual labor. Great idea. Thanks for virtue signalling.

    24. Re:I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does *IF* they stop putting it in the "common pool" where it gets spent on other things!

    25. Re:I hate cars by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Next time you eat cheese or grapes, think about how only the richest of people ate those only a few short generations ago

      What? I suppose grapes depends on where you live, but "bread and cheese" has been synonymous with poverty since forever.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    26. Re: I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to forget coca cola santa Claus!

    27. Re:I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except this trend away from public transport happened all around the world, not just your one country. And GM had no part in it in those other countries. Cars offer a whole bunch of benefits that people wanted, and there was no insight into the terrible effects they would have on cities. The public, politicians, and companies were all complicit in the destruction of public transport.

    28. Re:I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did the math in my situation.
      Driving: 45 minutes each way, 1.5 daily.
      Public transport: 1.5 HOURS each way, 3 hours daily. Double. no thank you.

    29. Re:I hate cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the public transport solution is never actually a solution. Just someone spending money on what they think is a solution,.
      Like "high speed rail" in California, currently slated to connect one farm town to another farm town. going mostly slowly.
      Instead of using the money building a proper public transport system.

  8. My city has those by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    we spent a few hundred on a sensor that only trips if a car pulls up. Your city's being cheap. The sensors work and work well. They're not even that expensive.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:My city has those by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Please let me know where these sensors are that work well. Most of them I've dealt with change the light for nobody and then fail to detect cars. I can't tell you how many red lights I've sat through unnecessarily waiting for a left turn arrow that no one was waiting for...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    2. Re:My city has those by nwaack · · Score: 1

      The sensors work and work well..

      No, they don't. This one has a sensor - one of those cameras that watches everything. The light still turns red as I'm pulling up to it even though there's no cross traffic. Also, this was just an example. The traffic management system, in general, is very much broken.

    3. Re:My city has those by nwaack · · Score: 0

      Don't listen to rsilvergun, he's a know-it-all dick. He hangs out at Slashdot for the soul purpose of disagreeing with others, even if he knows the position he's taking is blatantly wrong.

    4. Re:My city has those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're everywhere in the Netherlands and they usually work without problems. Intersections without vehicle detection are rare here.

    5. Re:My city has those by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Every single traffic light in my city of 4.4 million is a sensored light. And all the arterial ones are connected to a central traffic light control center that adjusts the timings to maximise traffic flow....

    6. Re:My city has those by nwaack · · Score: 1

      It's not that they don't work (although many don't if you're on a bike or motorcycle), it's that they're timed terribly even if they do work.

    7. Re:My city has those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not my experience (in the Netherlands). There are cases where they are timed pretty badly, but generally they work well. My only annoyance is how the efficient cycle is often interrupted by buses and trams, which get priority over everything else at many intersections.

  9. Americans Get Shit For Holidays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember Germans get three more weeks PAID vacations than you Americans because theyre a better, smarter people than you.

    USA is for suckers.

    1. Re: Americans Get Shit For Holidays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commuting across Germany would be a breeze. Such a tiny country. Real men drive semis across the country and laugh at your long vacations from their truck stop micro hotel rooms

    2. Re: Americans Get Shit For Holidays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real Germans blitzkrieg across Poland!

    3. Re: Americans Get Shit For Holidays by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      # ToDo: Soviet Russia gag goes here.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re: Americans Get Shit For Holidays by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      # ToDo: Soviet Russia gag goes here.

      If it wasn't for the brave Germans in WW2 we'd all be speaking Russian by now.

      No, wait, that's not it...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  10. Having Love Affair when you're stuck in traffic by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 1

    Now you're talking! ;)

    --
    Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
  11. Riding is Productive by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

    I've lived close to and far from work over the years. Most recently I moved from a 15 minute in town commute to a 45 minute commute. I'm finding that the 45 minute commute is pretty productive. I think about work and home things, it lets me wind down and get ideas. I'll either make a spoken note or just remember what I want to do to make improvements to whatever I'm doing be it home or work related. I almost never have any music, pod cast, or books on tape going as a quiet commute is my desire. The short commute went from busy at work to busy at home with no downtime or quiet time. Perhaps taking 30 minutes or an hour at home after work to just chill would replace the commute but it's hard to make the time where commuting is unavoidable.

    When I go on vacation, I ride my motorcycle and within a couple of days, all my work cares have fallen away behind me. It's the positive aspect of heading out on vacation.

    And I suspect I'm a boomer of some sort, tail end at least (61 years old).

    [John]

    --
    Shit better not happen!
    1. Re:Riding is Productive by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      I often think about work projects during a commute in public transport. When I drive myself, I prefer to keep my full attention on the traffic.

    2. Re:Riding is Productive by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      When I drive, I prefer to post things on Slashd{#`%${%&`+'${`%&NO CARRIER

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    3. Re:Riding is Productive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are certainly free to do that, but me, I cannot understand the idea of working for free. Because that is what you are doing. All that time spent thinking about work during your commute, I know you're not putting it down on your time sheets. And if you tried your boss would first laugh and then reprimand you.

  12. Despite marketing cars are useful transportation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Love affair" is just car company marketing. People buy cars because they are useful transportation tools and other options like buses or trains are unvailable, take longer or are too expensive (to build at taxpayers expense).

    Even in a congested area during rush hours cars often remain the fastest and cheapest transportation option. If electric cars become widespread, then they will also be the most environmentally friendly transportation option for travel outside of the densely populated urban core. If autonomous cars become widespread then cars will become a much safer transportation option than they are today.

    Usually train, subway and bus transit options are the answer in those congested areas. Still for a sizable portion of any population transit will never be a viable, affordable or desirable option. And that shouldn't be driving transit advocates to distraction.

  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. Autonomous cars by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    This is where autonomous cars will help. When you can get work done as part of your commute it becomes less of a hassle. This is why rich people have drivers, so they can be conducting business and the driver has no incentive to get worked up about traffic as it's their job and they get paid no matter what traffic is doing.

    While is may be practical for some people to pick up a cheap rental near work to live and work in during the week, it's not a practical solution for people who have families. And it requires that the time you save can be put towards real actual additional paid work to make it financially worth it.

    Public transit exacerbates the problem by extending the time wasted commuting while providing no ability to get work done even though someone else is driving.

    The problem of the commute can be solved two ways: make it shorter or make it more productive.

    Business class Waymo with Wifi and enough room to comfortably sit with a laptop. That would be useful. Unless you tend to get motion sickness.

    Telsa is working on making the commute shorter. Which is probably the most practical solution for most people. The question is whether it will either be affordable or take enough richer people off the road to make the freeways not terrible for the rest.

  15. Isn't this because Baby boomers have more time by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    on their hands? I mean, worst case their kids are grown up and the work. A lot are just plain retired. Of course they don't mind spending time in a car the way a Millennial working two jobs and taking care of the kids does.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  16. One can get used to not driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One can get used to not driving. I stopped driving 2 years ago and started cycling to work. I listen to audiobooks on the way and have both lost weight, improved health and consumed about 700 hours of books.

    Still have the car, as I need to drive to my parents every now and then, but I really hate driving now. On the plus side, my car, which used to require expensive service every few months (thats Range Rover for you) can somehow magically survive an entire year without a mechanical failure :-)

  17. The problem isn't cars by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

    The problem is city design as well as the concept of a work day is 9 to 5.

    We cluster so much similar types of work in a concentrated location and dictate that it all starts and ends at the same hour.

    Convince your employer to start an hour later or earlier and you will see a major difference.

    --
    DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    1. Re:The problem isn't cars by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Convince your employer to start an hour later or earlier and you will see a major difference.

      I took your idea and wanted to improve upon it. However, my boss was not amused when I asked that we change our work hours from 08:00-to-17:00 to 21:00-to-06:00.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:The problem isn't cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Convince your employer to start an hour later or earlier and you will see a major difference.

      Doubtful. Plenty of places are flexible with work hours and all that gets you is a rush hour that lasts 2-3 hours in the morning and is brutal in the evening because the people who get in earlier stay later so they can work fewer days. As with adding lanes to the highway, adding more options for start times just encourages people to live further out, leading to more traffic and no real improvement. I can get in any time between 6 and 9, but that turns into options of either 6 or 9 because traffic is a nightmare in between. If I need to be in by 8, I have to leave by 6:30 (6/5:30, 7/6:00, 9/8:00, 10/9:30, etc.). And if your job involves interacting with other people, you can't have much more flexibility than that (telework aside).

    3. Re:The problem isn't cars by nevermindme · · Score: 1

      No, it is the absolutely the self-abusive Luddites who insist on going to work when Work From Home is a viable option compared to a cube farm in many industries. The other half of traffic is the older gentry driving 60 miles each way when down at the corner telemedicine would be a cheaper option if their asshole care providers would adapt.

      Once you become an adult in a modern corporate culture like GenX slackers you will learn no matter what your role there is no need to be in a cube farm at 9:45 on Friday before a holiday or drive through a snowstorm to be on conference call with the other division in someplace worse. Unemployment is 3.5... nobody is going to get fired for remoting it in.

    4. Re:The problem isn't cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that this is a completely different subject, right? I know nobody reads the articles, but could you at least be bothered to read the preceding comments? The issue being discussed here is the effect of work hours on traffic patterns. The feasibility of telework is a separate issue.

      As for the subject you brought up, there are some serious flaws in your arguments. It's not the workers that set the remote working policies, it's the companies. Increasingly, companies want their employees to be physically located at the workplace. And you can't define the utility of being physically present by the edge cases. I work with people who are remote from our location and there is a definite productivity drop; there's just no substitute for in-person human interaction. Being able to shout over the wall, listen in on discussions, or just walk down the hall and pick the brain of whoever happens to be around is invaluable in a lot of workplaces. If you're just doing menial code monkey tasks, then sure, work wherever and whenever you want. But if you have a big boy job that involves a lot of moving pieces, you put yourself at a disadvantage if you're not where the rest of the team is located. And yes, you're going to get fired if you work remotely when it is prohibited in your job description.

  18. It depends..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...for me the commute would probably be more enjoyable if I owned a brand new Dodge Challenger Hellcat vs. my current 250,000+ mile POS Chevy S10 pickup......, but unfortunately I will never be able to afford a Hellcat, so I am stuck with the POS and currently loathing my commute.

  19. So sorry you're stuck in traffic... by Uncle_Meataxe · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... because I'm not. I've been commuting by bicycle for the last 20 years. It's like being on vacation while getting to work -- the best part of my day! It's a bit over 20 miles (33 km) each way so I'm on the bike for about two hours/day. What's great is that I get two hours of workout in per day for essentially one hour of time (it takes 30 minutes to drive each way). The thing most motorist don't understand is riding a bike is often faster than driving. On surface streets, it's almost always faster to ride a bike during commute hours. On average, cars go about 13 mph (21 kph) in cities, which is a very easy speed to ride a bike. Yeah, I live in California, but I've commuted year 'round in Michigan too, so there...

    1. Re:So sorry you're stuck in traffic... by VitrosChemistryAnaly · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I do too. After switching to commuting by bike (8 miles each way), I can never go back to driving to work. If the weather is especially nasty, I'll take public transportation or telework.

      Plus sides include getting my exercise in for the day on my way to/from work, I'm super relaxed and more productive at work, I'm not putting miles on my car...

      I suppose I'm lucky to live in the reasonably dense mid-Atlantic with plenty of biking lanes and paths. I grew up in Indianapolis and couldn't imagine trying to commute by bike there. Too much hostility towards bikers.

      --
      "It's a tarp!" -- Dyslexic Admiral Ackbar
    2. Re:So sorry you're stuck in traffic... by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I live in California, but I've commuted year 'round in Michigan too, so there...

      Have you tried this in New Orleans? 35C and 95% humidity is just ideal for biking, amiright?

      Of course, that's only a problem seven or eight months a year, so maybe it would work for you....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:So sorry you're stuck in traffic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but do you have to wear that damn lycra?

    4. Re:So sorry you're stuck in traffic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... because I'm not. I've been commuting by bicycle for the last 20 years. It's like being on vacation while getting to work -- the best part of my day! It's a bit over 20 miles (33 km) each way so I'm on the bike for about two hours/day. What's great is that I get two hours of workout in per day for essentially one hour of time (it takes 30 minutes to drive each way). The thing most motorist don't understand is riding a bike is often faster than driving. On surface streets, it's almost always faster to ride a bike during commute hours. On average, cars go about 13 mph (21 kph) in cities, which is a very easy speed to ride a bike. Yeah, I live in California, but I've commuted year 'round in Michigan too, so there...

      Nothing against biking but if it takes 2 hours a day to bike and 1 hour a day to drive it's not faster. Healthier, sure, but not faster. Plus you can't bike on highways which would dramatically increase the total distance I need to commute. You get sweaty biking, which can be problematic unless your office has a shower or something. If it's actively snowing or raining it's even worse. You can't carry as much stuff, which could be fine for many but still a problem for many. Not to mention if EVERYONE starts biking you just have the same problem again but with new vehicles. Accidents would be higher too as you can't fall off or tip a car. Put a few hundred thousand people on bikes at 7:00AM heading to the same places and see how much you still like biking to work.

      The core problem is population density and the antiquated idea that you need to go to an office to sit behind a computer. There are certainly jobs that can't telecommute but many (maybe most) can. No matter how you travel, if everyone starts doing it at the same time to the same places you're going to have problems. Public transportation isn't really the answer either since even that won't scale properly. Around here everyone just drives to bus or train stations which just changes the traffic locations. Most people aren't going to be walking a couple of miles everyday to a bus stop which STILL doesn't address the problem of long commutes, it just changes the mechanics.

      There are only two solutions to this problem with the current tech we have or is on the horizon. One is stop congregating to work, which is the easiest, cheapest and most effective. Two is remove the human component of driving. Going full self-driving vehicles will GREATLY reduce traffic since most traffic is caused by human inefficiency. Stopping, starting, merging, maintaining speed, paying attention, and not getting into wrecks are all things people are exceptionally shitty at and are the primary causes of traffic. Other things, like construction or road closures, cause problems but are usually minor until exacerbated by bad drivers being dumb.

    5. Re:So sorry you're stuck in traffic... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I didn't buy my first car until I was 27.

      You advertise that riding a bike to work is "great"; however, pardon me while I punch huge holes in that view.

      Riding 20 miles will require effort. Effort implies sweat. Being coated with slime for 8 hours until the ride home is NOT pleasurable.

      When riding a bicycle, you are exposed to the elements. Riding against the wind (80% of your journeys) will, again, engender sweat. But wait, it gets worse. Water falls from the sky from time to time. I don't know about you, but I found it impossible to stay dry. Thankfully, I never really had to deal with snow.

      Drivers occasionally try to hit you. I am not talking about the driver not paying attention here, I am talking about the driver locking eyes with you and intentionally moving their car in such a way as to make it impossible for you to not get hit. Granted, those are rare, but it did happen to me 3 times in 10 years. I intend to live longer than 10 years and it hurts getting hit by a car.

      Again, drivers, but this time we will deal with the people who don't pay attention. I found myself in life threatening situations frequently. I generally rode in residential streets to keep it from being a minute to minute threat on my life, but every intersection was a gamble if there was another car around. Stop signs are optional if you will only be running over a cyclist, apparently.

      Riding a bike is useful and great, but you oversell it. By FAR.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    6. Re:So sorry you're stuck in traffic... by Uncle_Meataxe · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I hear you. 95% humidity is a problem even when it's 26 C. That's part of the reason I moved to a less humid climate. But, I ride even when it's over 43 C (110 F) here (usually 20% humidity). It's surprisingly comfortable when it's really hot as the sweat evaporates immediately. For riding less than an hour, it's also not a problem well below freezing. You just have to have the right clothes. Of course, I have a place to shower on both ends.

    7. Re:So sorry you're stuck in traffic... by Uncle_Meataxe · · Score: 1

      Sure, you'll need a shower at work if you ride any significant distance or in bad weather. And yeah, riding a bike is exercise. If you don't like sweating, it's probably not for you. I have friends who drive hours on the weekends to do wild adventures in the mountains, often involving some discomfort. Maybe it's hard to imagine, but adventure can be fun. That's the way I see it when I take off in bad weather. If you haven't been to Copenhagen or Amsterdam, you'd be surprised that the roads are *packed* with bike commuters, even when the weather gets a bit dicey.

      And, not sure where you live, but I've been riding 10,000 miles/year for 25 years, in three states, in lots of cities and places, and I've never had any motorist *try* to hit me. I usually favor the same thoroughfares that you'd take in a car (if they have bike lanes) because it's faster and more efficient. Residential streets can be more dangerous with people pulling out of driveways, kids running into the streets, etc.

  20. Used to dread my commute. by TigerPlish · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was 1.5 hours from my house to the shop in Calle Ocho. Through the worst of miami. 2nd gear crawling most of the time.

    Then I got a better job, closer to home. I actually get to enjoy my car now. I floor the first 3 gears then lazy-shift up the last 3. Nice, flowing traffic -- fast, mind you, but easy.

    There's those who love to drive, and those who hate driving and hate cars. Guess who there's more of. Yeah. This is why cars are maybe 5% of the cars out there, and the rest are lumbering land-cows called "SUVs" and "Crossovers."

    And of those 5%, maybe 1% of those are sports car. What the hell happened? What's with all the land cows?

    Leave the driving to those who love cars. The rest of you, for all that is holy, get your self-driving podmobiles already!

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re: Used to dread my commute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SUV (land cow) makes you feel powerful sitting high above traffic. And in a sense they are right, in a crash that land cow is going to grow horns and gut your sports car like an unlucky matador

    2. Re:Used to dread my commute. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The "land cows" have always been there. Before SUVs and crossovers, Americans bought Oldsmobile station wagons with fake wood siding and land barges like the Ford LTD. And then mooooomyvans like the Dodge Caravan...

    3. Re:Used to dread my commute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a ford fairmont. Man that thing was a beater.

    4. Re:Used to dread my commute. by dj245 · · Score: 1

      There's those who love to drive, and those who hate driving and hate cars. Guess who there's more of. Yeah. This is why cars are maybe 5% of the cars out there, and the rest are lumbering land-cows called "SUVs" and "Crossovers."

      And of those 5%, maybe 1% of those are sports car. What the hell happened? What's with all the land cows?

      I've owned small cars, sport sedans, motorcycles, and hatchbacks all my life. I looked down upon large vehicles as unnecessary. Until last month when I started a concrete business and had to trade up for a truck. While I love the cornering of a small car and shuffling through the gears of a manual transmission, it just doesn't make sense in some places. My knee was in constant pain when I had a manual transmission Miata in Houston. If I had gotten into any accident in my CRX I would have probably been killed. All of my vehicles were fine for a single guy or a couple without kids who rented, but beyond that they had some serious drawbacks. And several of the places I have lived had a monopoly on straight, flat roads so driving wasn't particularly fun anyway.

      If I'm spending 4 hours a day in a vehicle making sales calls, I want a vehicle that completely isolates me from the road, the traffic, and any other unpleasantness outside. As a bonus, my truck isn't especially high end but it has 400HP and is respectably fast in a straight line.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    5. Re:Used to dread my commute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Get kids and come back with your experience hauling them and their stuff around to their various activities in your little go-kart.

    6. Re:Used to dread my commute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cars are maybe 5% of the cars out there, and the rest are lumbering land-cows called "SUVs" and "Crossovers."

      And of those 5%, maybe 1% of those are sports car. What the hell happened? What's with all the land cows?

      Leave the driving to those who love cars. The rest of you, for all that is holy, get your self-driving podmobiles already!

      Took my sports cars in for service and the dealer lent me one of those popular pickup trucks. Driving that monstrosity was a miserable experience. No wonder the fools who drive Stupid Useless Vehicles don't like driving, that's not driving, it's torture!

    7. Re:Used to dread my commute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS - My sports car has been hit 3 times by retards driving 4 door pickup trucks.

    8. Re:Used to dread my commute. by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      The idea is to live somewhere walkable (older suburb or real city) where kids don't have to be hauled around everywhere in a steel-and-glass isolation bubble. Also, people the world over manage to raise kids and have smaller (like Camry/Corolla) sized cars.

    9. Re:Used to dread my commute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah lets fit a family of 5 in a fucking sports car.

      You're a self righteous twat.

    10. Re:Used to dread my commute. by shilly · · Score: 1

      We have two kids and drive a Renault Zoe. It's plenty big enough for them and their kit, and it's small size means it can get round town (and SUVs) easily. Instant torque is helpful for that, too.

    11. Re:Used to dread my commute. by houghi · · Score: 1

      I love to drive. I really, absolutely love to drive. During my vacations I will fly somewhere, rent a car and spend 3 hours in the morning and 3 hurs in the afternoon driving. I really love it.

      That said: I hate commuting in a car. I hate it. To me it is wasted time. I do not even own a car anymore. I still rent cars during the holidays. Flying in Europe is pretty cheap, even when I avoid the real cheap airlines.

      I use Cambio as car sharing. Once a week I take a car for 2 hours to do my weekly shopping. And if I have time, I can take one for a day during the weekend.

      As the company pays my public transport 100% (not uncommon in Belgium. I believe 50% is required by law) it is all money not spend. By selling my car I save easily 200-250EUR per month in the car devaluation, insurance, taxes, fuel and maintenance.

      The commute now for me from door to door is just under 1 hour. With a car it is over an hour and up to 1.5 hours on more busy days. If there is no traffic (e.g. on a Sunday) it would be 20 minutes by car, door to door.

      As an extra, If I decide to have a drink after work, I do not have to stick to water. I can drink one of the many great Belgian Beers, take the train home and be safe.

      I really love driving. The smaller the car, the more I like it (as long as it isn't a "sportscar") I hate standing still.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Used to dread my commute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was 1.5 hours from my house to the shop in Calle Ocho. Through the worst of miami. 2nd gear crawling most of the time.

      Then I got a better job, closer to home. I actually get to enjoy my car now. I floor the first 3 gears then lazy-shift up the last 3. Nice, flowing traffic -- fast, mind you, but easy.

      There's those who love to drive, and those who hate driving and hate cars. Guess who there's more of. Yeah. This is why cars are maybe 5% of the cars out there, and the rest are lumbering land-cows called "SUVs" and "Crossovers."

      And of those 5%, maybe 1% of those are sports car. What the hell happened? What's with all the land cows?

      Leave the driving to those who love cars. The rest of you, for all that is holy, get your self-driving podmobiles already!

      You understand that the end game of self-driving cars is making other cars illegal on public roads, right? Not immediately, of course, but all the true benefits of self-driving vehicles are negated by still have human drivers on the road. No matter how good a driver you think you are, you will never be better than millions of cars that can act in unison and react faster. And no, you can't react faster than a computer.

  21. That's nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My dad is past retirement age but still commutes to work in Toronto every working day; His commute is just under 3 hours one way every day. I've told him many times that if I had to do that I would just blow my head off and call it a life, but not using those exact words.

  22. Feds Failed to Make Roads Safe for Non-Motorists by BrendaEM · · Score: 4, Informative

    America has written it's laws like everyone is born with a SUV strapped to their ass.
    If you make our transportation systems safer for pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists, and scooterists, it will cut down traffic, and reduce our dependence on oil.

    Scooters, motorcycles, and mopeds help reduce traffic in other countries.

    (Some scooters get 92MPG, many motorcycles get 64MPG.)

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  23. Time in car != time stuck in traffic by Solandri · · Score: 1

    The average American drives 13,476 miles each year. If they're spending 321 hours in their car each year, that works out to an average speed of 42 MPH. That's hardly bogged down by traffic, especially if you factor in time spent on local streets. I average about 20-25 MPH on local roads (after accounting for red lights). So if you figure half my commute time is on local streets, half on the highway, then I'm averaging 61.5 MPH on the highway.

    The "problem" isn't traffic. It's suburbanization and high housing prices at workplace locations, forcing people to live much further from their workplace than in the past. Public transportation is great for countering excessive traffic, but less effective at countering long commute distances (the bus or train is stuck between having few stops so less time is wasted waiting, and maintaining frequent stops so you don't have to walk far when you get to your destination car-less).

    It's also worth pointing out that the average (mean) for open-ended quantities (like time spent in a car per year - capped at 8760 hours) is skewed towards the high end by the few extreme persons. If 9 people in a room make $50k/yr, and the 10th person makes $5 million/yr, the average income for everyone in the room is $545k/yr. So the median number of hours spent in the car will be lower (probably a lot lower) than 321 hours.

    1. Re:Time in car != time stuck in traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average driver doesn't exist. The ones doing all the miles are not the ones sitting in traffic for hours every day.

      My wife used to have about a 13 mile commute here in Los Angeles and it could take her anywhere from 30 minutes to 2+ hours door to door depending on whether she drove in the middle of the night or during rush hour. That includes freeways, but as I understand it the last 0.1 miles near her workplace could take 15 minutes or more due to gridlock.

      On some afternoons, "rush hour" might be 16:30-20:00. She drove under 7k miles per year and yet spending only 321 hours commuting for a 5x 48 week calendar would mean about 40 minutes each way which was probably pretty close to her average trip time. If her commute was a little worse, like many of her colleagues, I suspect the numbers would be closer to 500 hours per year.

  24. Couldn't wait to drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in high school I couldn't wait to drive, even in the bigger cities like Chicago. Maybe too a lot of high schools don't provide drivers ed anymore. So people never bother to pay for private lessons? Myself, I have always lived in rural towns, heck my current town has one traffic light. We are miles from a town with a WalMart or other big retailers, so that lifestyle is something that requires a vehicle and yet its also less expensive then a big city to operate it. I still like my independence so for myself a vehicle is not a option, maybe I would think differently in a large city where mostly I could by without it.

  25. Love affair with driving? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

    Driving is the means, not the end. The love affair was not with the automobile, but with getting out and exploring new places.

    1. Re:Love affair with driving? by geek · · Score: 1

      Spoken like someone thats never driven a corvette. Floor one of those fuckers down the freeway some day and then tell me its about the destination because when I'm behind the wheel of one of those SOB's I really dont give to shits where I am going.

    2. Re:Love affair with driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flooring a corvette, usually results in the stabilitrak engaging. If you disabled it (not wise) back end meets front end often. When driving sports cars, you modulate the pedal, not on/off it.

    3. Re:Love affair with driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ever own a 'Vette long-term or just drive one on occasion? I've owned three now ('88, '94, and an '05), and while they are fun, the novelty wears thin if they are your daily driver. They were the most uncomfortable rides I've ever owned. My '05 was just a toy, so it didn't seem as bad. Back problems forced me to get rid of it since getting in and out became an unnecessarily painful ordeal.

    4. Re:Love affair with driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense, commuting in a proper sports car has never worn thin for me. I've commuted in a string of RX-7s since the mid 1990's. An FB, then an FD, and now and FE (RX-8). All manuals (every day is leg day!). Typical commute is 25 miles of city streets, highway, and a little bit of country. Never gets old. And I'm not young.

  26. What about Gen X ?!? by Comboman · · Score: 3

    Her research showed a notable difference between millennials and baby boomers.

    You do know there's a whole generation in between Boomers and Millennials right? A lot of Boomers are retired now, so if this research is being done on commuters, the people you are calling "Baby Boomers" are probably Generation X.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:What about Gen X ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one actually knows who makes up which generations anymore.

    2. Re:What about Gen X ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Her research showed a notable difference between millennials and baby boomers.

      You do know there's a whole generation in between Boomers and Millennials right? A lot of Boomers are retired now, so if this research is being done on commuters, the people you are calling "Baby Boomers" are probably Generation X.

      These studies always forget that we exist, only Boomers and Millennials matter to them. We're the ones always going "well nobody asked me" whenever we see these studies and poll results.

    3. Re:What about Gen X ?!? by grumpy-cowboy · · Score: 1

      In all "serious" studies, it's Millenials VS !Millenials

      --
      Will $CURRENT_YEAR be the year of the Linux Desktop?
    4. Re:What about Gen X ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read it as "there's a significant generational difference between Boomers and Millennials. (We may infer that Gen X sits between the two, so the difference between them and each of the others is less significant. But that's speculation.)"

    5. Re:What about Gen X ?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Millennials is used for people who were young during the millennial shift which includes people born in the 80's.
      So the split is something like over/under 35 year old.

      I'm 37 and is apparently considered to be among the older Millennials.
      When I grew up that expression didn't exist so I assumed that I was from Generation X until I tried to figure out what a Millennial was.

  27. Vacation time commute time? Really? by magzteel · · Score: 2

    "Our study shows average_vacation_time average_commute_time".

    How is this significant? Does anyone commuting think like this? I just view commuting as part of a typical work day.

    It should come to no ones surprise that my vacation_days my_work_days.

  28. No Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who really enjoys driving to and from work?

  29. Re:Vacation time commute time? Really? by magzteel · · Score: 1

    ugh, Why does a LESS_THAN symbol disappear?

    "Our study shows average_vacation_time IS_LESS_THAN average_commute_time".

    How is this significant? Does anyone commuting think like this? I just view commuting as part of a typical work day.

    It should come to no ones surprise that my vacation_days IS_LESS_THAN my_work_days.

  30. 600+ hours commuting by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    120 hours of PTO (can't really call it vacation, since what used to be 5 sick/personal days are now lumped into it, so really about 80 hours of vacation). Plus 80 holidays.

    Yes, my life sucks....

    1. Re:600+ hours commuting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That 600 hours should be detucted from the vacation and holidays time you dirty communist!

  31. No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay away. We've got too many idiots from SoCal invading and building McMansions already.

  32. This is a half-assed supposition. by ckatko · · Score: 1

    Okay, yeah, we're in cars. You know what we're also doing? Getting utility out of those cars by being able to live further away from dense cities while commuting into them for our high-paying jobs.

    People wouldn't sit in traffic unless they had to? No shit. People also tend to work in sweatshops because they're _better paying than every other job_ in their town.

    I agree that it's a good amount of perspective that we get less vacation than we drive to work in terms of hours to convoy how long we really spend getting to our jobs and not getting paid for it. But that's... basically it. It's just a "huh... that's interesting." trivia point like "We drink X gallons of soda every year."

    Yeah, we should probably drink less soda. And it would be NICE if we didn't have to drive as far. It'd also be NICE if we weren't filling our lungs with pollution (from those same cars!) that causes asthma and allergies and learning disorders in our children. Except this last point actually means something. People are literally dying from our car's gas engines. And that's way more important than, "Oh no, I have to sit in a car and listen to music or podcasts in traffic while I go to my job that pays 10x more than 99% of the country"

    My first computer science job paid $25,000 a year. After three years I made $32,000. I was responsible for data migrations for entire companies involving C#, SQL, and mobile applications. 32. fucking. grand. before taxes.

    If I moved to Seattle, I'd be making >100,000 a year easily for the same job. I have friends there and they assured me of this--trying to get me to move and join their companies.

    You think I wouldn't mind sitting in a car for an hour a day to Joe Rogan podcasts while I make literally FOUR TIMES as much money? (Or more.)

    Now, why haven't I done that? Well, I got proper fucked by genetics and I'm currently staying near family because a strong support system has more UTILITY to me than a high pay check at the moment. But that's the key. People sit in traffic (and work) in large cities because the highest paying jobs (and ability to jump from one job to another instead of "the one big company in my town") are worth the minor inconvenience of sitting in a car. Even if you hate sitting in a car, if you treated your time in the car as a "billable hour" that you weren't getting paid for, you're still making far more money than 90% of the country and more money per hour sitting in your car in traffic than semi-truck drivers are making doing it for a living.

    In otherwords, nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:This is a half-assed supposition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would mind, there's no way i'll be sitting in a car more than half an hour one way.

    2. Re:This is a half-assed supposition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't matter if the offer you four times the salary when the cost of living is 5-6 times where you are now. Seattle is stupid-expensive even if you plan on communing an hour or more to get out to the boonies where it's slightly more affordable.

  33. Cross-Country by djbckr · · Score: 1

    I've always loved a good cross-country drive, and I still do. But to drive to work every day? No thanks. I get to work from home, so I don't have to deal with rush-hour local traffic (Redmond/Seattle) thank $DEITY - If I had to commute to the office every day, I'd have to kill somebody.

  34. more productive tasks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...59 percent of millennials saying they'd "rather spend time doing more productive tasks than driving

    Like posting crap no one cares about on Facebook ?

    (come on, "millenals" and "doing more productive tasks" literally opened the door for that...)

  35. Working from home and waiting out traffic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a white collar tech worker, I can often opt to work from home. A lot of people at our office do a majority of the time even though its mandated no more than 2 days a week. It is often a ghost town in our office now and I wonder why we even really need it anymore. They could cut our office space to 1/3 what it is now, and do a hot desking situation instead. A lot of such companies could do this, even some call centers and this would cut down on the need for so many cars on the road.

    When I do go into the office, I usually don't get in until 10 now because I have morning meetings with India that we take care of in the morning from home. Then we come in, if we feel we need to. At the end of the day, I take advantage of the company exercise room or the nearby park if it is nice weather to get a walk in for about 30-45 minutes, watching the traffic stream by as I do. A few others have caught on and do this now as well. By the time I get finished, traffic is down to a trickle and the drive home is quick and unstressful.

  36. No. by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 1

    I love driving, and I consider it a hobby as well as essential transportation. I grew up in a big city but I no longer live in one, so there are no traffic jams here, ever. the system functions as intended and driving is a pleasure. I have a car, a truck and a travel trailer. I use the car when I'm not hauling things - 34 MPG and fast. The diesel truck gets used when hauling or towing.

    There is a rather large disconnect between the city experience and the country experience. Here it's a central part of life, where in the City maybe it has gotten to the point where a lot of people would rather do without or use ride sharing services.

    My only wish is that one group does not push their agenda on another group. Public transportation is not useful for people who actually do physical things for living, build physical things, sell things, haul things. The time scale is not conducive to business either. I can spend all day on public transit to get one task done, or spend two hours to get five tasks done in a car. The former makes no sense in a world where the latter is available.

    I spent a good amount of time in Japan, and there public transit made much more sense. I never rent a car, always use the rail system. The population density and size of the country lends itself to it much better than the distribution and size of the US. Europe is larger but still better distributed for it. But I don't like it when people want to get rid of cars for the sake of getting rid of cars. It does not make sense universally.

    1. Re:No. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Public transportation is not useful for people who actually do physical things for living, build physical things, sell things, haul things.

      I often see this argument on slashdot, along with "well my monster truck can carry fourteen tons of concrete and a bunch of ten foot steel girders if I ever need to, um, get some concrete and steel girders to build a small bridge one weekend".

      If you need a truck for work, fine. If you need to carry some heavy building materials once a year, hire a truck for the day.

      It's nothing to do with the benefits or drawbacks of commuting to an office job each day by car.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  37. I find worrying about getting creamed by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    By some drunk and/or dumb person way more stressful. Plus I have to worry about my car breaking down and the price of gas.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I find worrying about getting creamed by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      I'd worry more about getting creamed by some drunk guy on the subway, to be honest!

    2. Re:I find worrying about getting creamed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL, then you need to buy better cars!

    3. Re:I find worrying about getting creamed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >the cost of maintenance/wear/gas is a lot of money
      >LOL SO SPEND MORE MONEY

  38. What's crazy is that with a 2 week vacation by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    you're in pretty good shape. Not saying you shouldn't be mad about how crap life is. Just saying the rest of us should be way, way more angry.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  39. Re:Vacation time commute time? Really? by JDShewey · · Score: 1

    ugh, Why does a LESS_THAN symbol disappear?

    Because it is the start of an HTML tag, and /. allows them in comments to a degree. Typically, you overcome this with the use of an HTML entity by typing out the HTML Entity Name. So typing "&gt;" will result in the site displaying a <

  40. It Follows The money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cost of owning and driving a car has become so great that people want out of the loop. It will get worse. When i started driving in 1958 a driver's license cost two dollars at Sear5s, was a piece of cardboard with no pics on it at all. Now when i get a new license it costs $75 but is good for six years. That means the employees needed to issue permits are six times cheaper than in the past. The US has a very subtle inflation that is changing many things in our lives. We could buy a new car for $1,000 and now the typical total cost of buying a new car is about $42,000. And gasoline can be such a curse that people avoid moving to rural areas. Gasoline in the city or suburbs is normally used in small quantities but in rural areas one has little choice other than buying a huge amount of gasoline. In short our system is failing. Look at the coal industry. One machine can easily replace 1,000 coal miners so the labor cost for call has dropped due to so few miners being employed yet what the end user pays for that coal makes using it more like throwing gold coins out the window. Americans have created a system in which we can no longer afford ourselves.

  41. Commuting doesn't suck. I like it. by mschuyler · · Score: 1

    I know that the prevailing sentiment here is traffic, commuting, and why you need to commute and how bad it all is. I commuted at least 25 miles one way my entire working life, and I enjoyed it. Being in my car, alone, driving, was the most pleasant and least stressful part of the day. I could listen to the radio--if I wanted to--or I could keep it off. There was no one else making extra noise, no constant pestering for attention, no distractions except other traffic, which was more or less an auto-pilot kind of thing. Further, no sitting next to others on the bus, no timetables, no waiting, no crowding. Public transportation? Good Lord, spare me, please!

    I've always enjoyed running through the gears, turning sharp corners, merging into traffic. I don't care what state I'm in as long as I'm in the state of transportation. I just love driving and have since I was 16. Over 50 years later I still love it. Now that I'm retired I miss it. Any excuse for a road trip and I'm in!

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
  42. Re:Feds Failed to Make Roads Safe for Non-Motorist by cmseagle · · Score: 1

    Some scooters get 92MPG

    That'd be pretty mediocre! My 125cc Honda gets >120 MPG. It won't cut it for freeway driving, but it'll get up to 45-50mph without too much struggling.

  43. Exactly!! by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    When our family relocated because I took an I.T. position in Maryland, we were stuck renting a run-down 1970's townhouse for the first couple of years, as we got our bearings. The school district it was in was rated very highly, so with 3 kids, that was a prime concern.

    As we started getting serious about searching for a house, we quickly found that almost anything out here with 3 bedrooms or more, suitable for our 5 person (6 with grandma, who lives with us most of the year now) family was WAY outside our price range unless we moved over an hour from the metro area.

    We finally compromised on buying a 105 year old home that had a separate 2 car garage and a partially finished basement, plus the bonus of a nice view near the top of a hill. It's in a small town near the river, and has a rail line running through it with a commuter train you can take to and from where I work. The school district? Not as good as where we stayed initially, but this district was still rated ok when we got here. I think it's gotten worse since then, but thankfully - our kids are reaching their teens and will be out of it soon.

    My workplace recently relocated me, along with a subset of our group, to a new office that's about 20 minutes closer to my house than my old office. But it ALSO meant there's no way to take the train there anymore, without doing a bus transfer. Too much headache so now I just deal with the drive.

    All in all, the driving around sucks -- but I don't regret our decisions either. I've been able to argue for my employer letting me work from home more often, these days, so that makes it a lot less painful. Compromising on the biggest investment you'll probably ever make (your house) doesn't seem wise to me, just to play a game of trying to be close to work. Not when work is full of highly mobile employees and they have multiple offices all over the country, and have already done 2 mergers and eliminated one new business they tried to start up in one city.

  44. Stop changing my font! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do I stop this dumb cunt from changing my font to the eye-bleeding Courier? Fuck her HTML wizardry!

  45. Where you live... by geggam · · Score: 1

    ... changes your view on this.

    Rural American a car / truck is mandatory as walking 15 miles to the store to get a pair of pants during snow or 100+ degree days simply isnt feasible walking / biking.

    Many states dont have enough people to subsidize public transit in medium sized cities let alone small town USA

    Big city areas.... driving a car to work always ended up being stressful. Having a car to do weekend stuff was a huge benefit

    I enjoy driving in rural America. Cant stand driving in cities where all you road boulders are parked in the left lane or worse where you are bumper to bumper while bicycles pass you by

  46. Re:Vacation time commute time? Really? by magzteel · · Score: 1

    ugh, Why does a LESS_THAN symbol disappear?

    Because it is the start of an HTML tag, and /. allows them in comments to a degree. Typically, you overcome this with the use of an HTML entity by typing out the HTML Entity Name. So typing "&gt;" will result in the site displaying a <

    Thanks! Guess my markup is out of practice.
    I have to read more carefully before pressing 'submit'

  47. one of these things is not like the other by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    "roaring off on open highways" and "too much stop-and-go traffic" are generally talking about two different environments. I think there's a big difference in user experience between stop-and-go traffic to get to your work, and driving a country road in fall colors to a new destination.

    I suspect that what the study is really measuring is a cultural change brought on by easy access to personal electronics and social media. It's a sucking thing rather than a pushing thing. When most of your needs are being met by that silicon rectangle in your hand, it's easier to decide not to take that drive to the country and experience reality.

    The US is a big, big place and us humans don't actually inhabit more than a small portion of it. I ride (Harley) just for the fun of it, and I have no problems finding empty roads and interesting near-deserted places to explore all over the central and western US. I can ride for days, alone, and have a great time.

    I admit I may be an edge case. I'm old enough to be in the "let's go for a drive" generation, and I live right on the edge of my area's urban growth boundary. Head south-west for four blocks and I'm in the country. But even were I right in the middle of the metro area, it wouldn't be more than an hour to get out into the open, except during rush hour of course.

    I get that the problem as framed is that if you're driving for hours and hours to and from work during the week, why the heck would you want to take a drive on the weekend? My answer put succinctly is that it's a different thing. It's like, the difference between riding a stationary bike and riding a mountain bike in the woods. It's a different experience. Being bored to tears on the stationary doesn't preclude finding pleasure in a country ride.

    When I worked in the city, my commute was typically 45 minutes to 1.5 hours, one way, depending on traffic. I'm well aware that there's areas where this is a lot worse. My uncle had a commute in LA of three hours each direction, which begs the question, why the hell didn't he move somewhere else?

    Daughter is in her twenties, and she apparently inherited my love of driving. She has a small economical car that she takes exploring to let her mind decompress after a tough day, despite having a 40 minute to 1 hour commute each way to her job. Where she lives, there's traffic for about four blocks, and then open road. Admittedly, probably another edge case.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  48. Re:Feds Failed to Make Roads Safe for Non-Motorist by enjar · · Score: 1

    My Chevy Volt is doing 175 MPG for its lifetime average. My driving is averaging about 85-90% electric. My next vehicle will very likely be a full EV. My power comes from a power portfolio that is pretty clean already and is getting cleaner, plus I opt for paying more for green power on my bill to create demand for renewable sources versus fossil fuels. I live in a climate where two wheeled vehicles don't do well several months out of the year due to snow and ice. Yes, I know there are ways for cyclists and motorcyclists to deal with snow, ice, freezing temperatures and all that -- but most people aren't going to deal with that. Scooters and motorcycles powered by gasoline also sidestep a lot of emissions laws that cars don't, and can pollute quite a bit, even though they consume less fuel. Small engines can be emissions nightmares, especially two stroke engines.

  49. Cars are awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My car is no more than 5 minutes away at any given time. I can depart immediately at any time I want towards any destination. I can change my destination en-route. I can go out to lunch miles away, run errands, pick up dinner or groceries on the way home, or take home leftovers. I can leave home late and come home early if I don't feel well, go in early and stay at work late if I have to without worrying about schedules or waiting for anything to show up. My car is dry in the rain or snow, warm in the cold, air conditioned in the summer. I set the temperature to whatever I want and I pick the soundtrack. I can have private conversations in it, fart, pick my nose, change my clothes, eat a meal or take a nap in it without it being anybody else's business. I can carry just-in-case things I would otherwise leave at home rather than lug around in a bag: water, snacks, medications, deodorant, hand sanitizer, cash, lint roller, first aid kit, tool kit, backpack, grocery bags, a phone charger and battery, an umbrella, extra coat, gloves and change of clothes. I can carry infants and children without annoying others. There are hundreds of models to choose from, in many colors. They can be fun to drive fast, they can be fun to drive off-road, and soon may drive themselves if you'd like.

    Given the amount of R&D that has gone into producing a modern car, they are unbelievably cheap to buy. Decades of metallurgy, mechanical engineering design, manufacturing work, finite element simulations, fluid dynamics and combustion science (and/or battery research), thermodynamics, catalyst chemistry, transmission design, suspension development, even the tires are pretty sophisticated things nowadays. For many it's the most comfortable chair and best-sounding stereo they own. You're buying the product of hundreds of billions of dollars of R&D done by tens of thousands of people over a century or so. Maybe modern computers and smartphones can compete with that but not much else as the pinnacle of human technology.

    I'm all for others who hate driving taking public transport. Cars cost money to buy, refuel, maintain, register, insure. They create traffic, take up space, they make some noise and pollute the air. Are they practical in dense city areas, maybe not. Should they be electric? Yes. But even so cars are still awesome.

  50. I used to love driving, now I hate it. by cgiannelli · · Score: 1

    I used to love driving, never thought I'd ever want a self driving car. But I realize just how much productive time is wasted in the car going to and from an office that you really don't need to physically be in most of the time. Traffic where I moved to is getting worse. Once open highways are clogged, accident ridden messes. That's the other thing, so many accidents, as if every bad driver in the country moved here. So if it's not normal traffic it's hold ups because some dolt wrecked. People are simply incapable of taking care of themselves and need technology to do it for them.

  51. North America unlike World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a funny thing. Both the US and Canada once had public transportation networks that were the envy of the world but they were largely ripped out after the depression. Some cities, like Chicago, are still pretty good -- folks don't have to live in the heart of the city to have access to a bus or train to get places. Other locations not so much. Oh, the arguments were all that these services could not compete with personal cars but in many cases the numbers were rigged -- ask GM and others who helped. Problem is that the way things are built now makes very little allowance for implementing public transit of any flavor. One of the things that would have to be undone if any serious attempt were to be made to adapt to changing climate and reducing greenhouse gasses. Why this won't be a quick or cheap fix as centuries of technical development and a century or more of built environment all needs to be redone differently.

    In other places there was a bit more thought given to the future. One can visit big chunks of Europe and Japan and rely on public transportation that seamlessly connects. North America has gone out of its way to make it hard... wonder why?

  52. Vehicle sensors that ignore bicycles by tepples · · Score: 1

    we spent a few hundred on a sensor that only trips if a car pulls up.

    Which puts cyclists like me at a disadvantage. A lot of cities' traffic engineering departments in this country appear not to know how to calibrate their induction loops to recognize a bicycle with its wheels over the crack in the road. Sometimes it won't even recognize a bicycle and a motorcycle put together waiting on the same loop.

  53. Provided it's even running on a given day by tepples · · Score: 1

    I can do all sorts of stuff (work, relax, etc.) while on public transit.

    Provided public transit runs where and when you need. Citilink buses in Fort Wayne, Indiana, shut down for the night and have 58 days of scheduled downtime per year (source: fwcitilink.com) so that drivers can be with their families. Also provided you can carry and use a laptop for your work, as many tasks need a mouse, a large screen, or a powerful CPU or GPU.

    1. Re: Provided it's even running on a given day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also living in fort Wayne, never taken the bus, live on the North side commute is 3 minutes to work. No idea what this traffic is people speak about.

  54. Speak for yourself by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I can eat breakfast, shave, catch up on the news and post to /. all while dri#$#![CARRIER LOST]

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  55. Legal minimum size of a dwelling by tepples · · Score: 1

    Adjusted for inflation, the average cost per square-foot has barely changed.

    But has the minimum size in square feet that a given city's zoning law allows a home builder to build changed? I seem to remember some cities were fighting the tiny house movement in court.

  56. Damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just wrote out a huge comment and then the "prove yourself" question was undecipherable. It had an infinity symbol in it? It failed and erased my whole comment!

  57. What would help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would love a real estate website that allows you to put in one or more work addresses, and it shows a map of total commute times. It would have been very useful for me. I thought my favorite neighborhood was too far a commute to my office, so I didn't consider it. I later found out that there is a back-road short cut that is quite reasonable. Perhaps a upper price range, and it could show the houses with the shortest commutes, or just label all the houses you browse with your total commute times.

  58. "something better to do" huh!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Millenials cannot frigging walk down the street without their nose in their phones. I've been polling in Brooklyn. It's astounding. Beautiful fall day. Phone zombies.

    So sure, "something more meaningful" being "social media 7x24"

    Now , get off my lawn, ya bastadahs...

  59. There's a whole damn generation in the middle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Her research showed a notable difference between millennials and baby boomers" - there's a generation you skipped there, but don't worry not giving a shit is our defining feature.

  60. Not me by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Not only do I enjoy driving, I PREFER to drive a stick shift. My personal car is a Mustang for the weekends. I requested my employer provided car to be a stick shift as well. Living out here in flyover country, (small-medium city 200k), a 10 minute commute to work would be a lifetime. Lots of great country to drive in here. From time to time, I have to go to Tulsa, Dallas, Chicago, Detroit but I don't fly...I drive. As long as the cruise control & spotify work, doesn't bother me one bit.

  61. Re:Feds Failed to Make Roads Safe for Non-Motorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Failed to make the roads safe for non-motorists"... I guess, when they were making roads for motor vehicles - like the Interstate Highway System - they should have taken into account pedestrians. Because nothing says "Transport people and goods throughout the United States quickly and efficiently!" like getting your 18-wheeler stuck behind somebody strolling down I-5 at 1 mph.

    "Sharing the road" is a reasonable concept in low-speed areas, like residential neighborhoods. But all the food you eat, all the goods you buy - it needs to travel fast. So we build highways. And those highways need to allow cars and trucks to move fast. Slow people need to get out of the way, or they will get hurt.

    Captcha: mashed. How very accurate.

  62. Driving is on my employer by reanjr · · Score: 1

    I live in a major city. I work in the suburbs. I take the 2 hour driving time directly out of my workday, so I only work 6 hours a day. My employer decided they want to run their op where office space is cheaper rather than where the talent lives. That's on them.

  63. Re:Feds Failed to Make Roads Safe for Non-Motorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The monospace font is like shouting, please don't do it just to be different.

  64. Yet another socialist pipe dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The state is mother, the state is father. The state will drive for you, to where the state knows you must go. Freedom is slavery. Yada yada yada.

  65. it's no longer fun by sad_ · · Score: 1

    driving my car used to be fun, it no longer is. besides the ever increasing traffic jams which means you're not really driving anyway, but just sitting in a car waiting, there are increased police presence making sure you're following the traffic rules, which also have become more complex/unclear and sometimes impossible to follow (not really the rules, but rather situations; contradicting signs etc) and fines have increased to ridiculous levels. clearly, there is no fun to be had anymore.
    i try to go to work by bike as much as possible, and still google maps reports that i've been in traffic for 42 hours last month! that is almost 2 days lost for nothing.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
  66. F*** Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I finally sold my car and moved to a city which has great public transportation. No more oil changes. No more trips to the gas station. No more pricey repairs from lying repairmen. No more haggling with lying car dealers. I still like to read about car technology and I love the designs of futuristic cars. But overall, because driving and owning a car suck so badly, I f***ing hate having a car. Good riddance.

  67. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 240h of vacation per year plus a 33% bonus over the salary so I'm cool.

  68. Re:Feds Failed to Make Roads Safe for Non-Motorist by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    many motorcycles get 64MPG

    As a motorcyclist, I have to say that's only true for very small motorcycles ridden very slowly.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  69. Public transportation is insufficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It does not go where I want when I want. Public transportation is nice if you want to be livestock moving where you're told you should want to go.

  70. Dream versus Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The dream of driving, the idyllic scenario, is driving a soft-top down a bendy road in some really scenic area of the world. It's summer and the roads have only light traffic, so you are free to enjoy the scenery and the road.

    So much of driving isn't that though. You are battling traffic to get to work. Construction means there are choke points or diversions. It's winter and the roads are slippery, and first thing in the morning it's dark. You have to plug in the block heater just to ensure the car will start and often, you have to dig the car out of a snowdrift.

    Guess which you do more of? Guess which I love and which I could frankly do without?

  71. traffic jams on American Graffiti? by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    I remember back in the day when I turned 18, went to DMV to get a license. then shortly after got my first car. $300 junker, yeah! now I get to go cruisin'. These days I can easily see why millennials would not pursue such, why? to go cruising in a traffic jam?

    Here in SF bay area not much option, public transportation ok in some areas, bad in many others. Problem is the mindset of everybody in this country (rail transportation, and ***real*** bike lanes unimaginable) but wait maybe the millennials will detour from baby boomer thinking. I have read a lot of congestion caused by additional cars such as Uber and Lyft as I see these as "constant commuters" as usually the car is parked at home or at work but only on the road during between. Uber cars are on the road constantly.

    I real stink I have are car commercials that show how fun it is to drive with wide open roads or city roads with no other cars (yeah, need the world become like "I am Legend" or "the Omega Man"). Cmon' how many people really like to drive, I say very few percent. Rest of us smucks just use it to get from point A to B.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com