Slashdot Mirror


Windows 10 Will Reserve 7GB of Your Computer's Storage in its Next Major Release So That Big Updates Don't Fail (zdnet.com)

In the next major release of Windows 10, Microsoft will reserve 7GB of your device's storage to resolve a Windows 10 bug thrown up by Windows Update not checking whether a PC has enough storage space before launching after big updates. From a report: As Microsoft warned ahead of the Windows 10 October 2018 Update, systems that don't have enough space to install Microsoft's 'quality updates' or new versions of the OS will see an error message explaining there is insufficient storage space. That happens because Windows doesn't check if a device has enough space before initializing. Microsoft's current solution is for users to manually delete unnecessary temporary files and temporarily move important files like photos and videos to external storage devices to make enough space for the update. This problem is more acute for devices with little storage capacity, such as many of the cheap 32GB flash-drive PCs on the market today.

191 of 368 comments (clear)

  1. No they won't by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Because none of my computers run Windows 10. If you aren't running Linux in 2019, you aren't paying attention.

    1. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm Windows 7/Linux mix until Windows 7 runs out of support. After that is 100% Linux.

    2. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I spend 30% of my time maintaining Windows machines.

    3. Re:No they won't by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I run Linux... in a container on Windows and FreeBSD.

      Oh, and so my kid can play Minecraft on his Chromebook.

      Technically, I suppose I run it on several devices in the house - Android, Chromebooks, Chromecasts, Ubiquiti, etc.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:No they won't by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Data collection. Spying. Owning you.

    5. Re:No they won't by tepples · · Score: 1

      I guess this is for people who work in industries where no GNU/Linux-compatible replacement for a business-critical Windows application or device driver is available. Even Wine fails for many real-world applications.

    6. Re:No they won't by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True you are not paying attention, because things actually work so smoothly in Windows 10, that you don't need to focus on keeping your OS running.

      Ok, I am being a bit sarcastic here. But Windows 10, doesn't suck that much, and Linux isn't that much better of an OS. I have a system with rather new hardware (With hardware designed for Linux, from System 76), and it duel boots Windows and Linux. And oddly enough windows runs faster and smoother for most application then Linux does.

      No Linux runs well on the system, and Windows 10 has its issues too. But it isn't like a Windows 10 user is so far behind in 2019 a Linux user.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    7. Re:No they won't by 110010001000 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Linux is a million times better because your data doesn't get sent to mega corporations for profit. You haven't been paying attention.

    8. Re:No they won't by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Nothing is more critical than keeping mega corporations from taking your data and spying on you.

    9. Re:No they won't by ArchieBunker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Can you point me towards the Linux builds for SolidWorks and Altium Designer as I need to get some work done. Also video editing is a hobby so how about Adobe Premiere?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    10. Re:No they won't by fbobraga · · Score: 2

      Second-rate, third-rate FOSS that just makes productivity other than software deving a pain to use?

      More users / popularity will fix this in near future (today, several pro-software have native linux support - I worked in http://serpro.gov.br/ : most of the Desktops are linux-only [Ubuntu, today...], and the tech support people love it! [very few idiotic problems, like virus spread...])

    11. Re:No they won't by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

      Pretty sure Ubuntu is sending your data to Amazon...

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    12. Re:No they won't by demon+driver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There are valid reasons against Linux, but more maintenance time or hassle isn't one of them. On the contrary, with any popular distribution all of which employ mature, well-engineered package management tools, Linux system and application maintenance is at least by one order of magnitude easier and significantly less time-consuming to boot (pun not intended)...

    13. Re:No they won't by kramer2718 · · Score: 2

      I paid quite a bit for my Mac, but it's worth it...

      It's a Unix. It works well out of the box but I can configure it almost as well as any Linux.

      Not a gamer, so no reason for me to use Windows.

      But yeah, fuck Windows. If I couldn't afford a Mac, I'd sure as shit be running Linux.

    14. Re: No they won't by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We get it. You've never used Linux and you like to parrot talking points from last century. Kindly do it somewhere else where you have a chance of not being recognized case a complete idiot though. Here most of us know how truly ridiculous your claims are.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    15. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I spend 30% of my time maintaining Windows machines.

      So do I. And by "maintaining" I mean continually uninstalling stupid crap (especially troubling is how much of it is 3rd party software like Candy Crush) that windows keeps installing on my user's machines, despite being told not to in Group Policy. Or re-assigning the default browser away from Edge, and back to IE. (I know IE sucks, but the primary software that is used by nearly every employee for 80+% of their job requires IE to be the default browser), or continually turning off all of the data collection because it all gets turned on after every software update...

      Windows 10 is the biggest piece of malware I deal with on a day to day basis.

    16. Re: No they won't by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is far easier to keep a Linux system working smoothly than a Windows system. I installed and configured a Linux system for my mother a decade ago. I haven't touched it since and it continues to work perfectly. That's literally 0% maintenance effort. Since you seem to be bad at math I'll put it on more "touchy / feely" terms you can understand ... You are a fucking clueless moron with no idea what you are talking about.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    17. Re:No they won't by tepples · · Score: 2

      Then let me rephrase it to sound less like "personal problems". If you were hired into a company that had standardized on SolidWorks, and it were your job to lead a company-wide transition to a replacement application that is compatible with GNU/Linux, which application would you choose to replace SolidWorks?

    18. Re:No they won't by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      I feel you on that... DAZ Studio gives you MacOS or Windows versions... if there were a Linux-native version, or Apple made a new MacBook Pro with a decent nVidia-based GPU (1060 or 1080GTX w/ 6GB RAM, please), I'd dump 'doze in a heartbeat (and yes it works in WINE, but not very well.) As it is, they don't, so I'm kind of stuck for now.

      But... I only keep CG stuff on said laptop, and nothing else.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    19. Re:No they won't by bobbied · · Score: 2

      I'm running Windows Media Center with my cable card network tuner on Windows 7 until the guide updates stop, then I will likely just convert to another guide provider until I cannot buy Xbox 360's anymore or the hardware takes a dump.... At which point I will review my options and likely end up with some streaming service option and drop cable totally.

      But that's not because I don't want to run Linux.. Only that I don't have any other option but WMC as it's the only option for protected content unless I want to spend an arm and a leg on a TiVo DVR setup and pay the monthly fees.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    20. Re:No they won't by BringsApples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft model:
      buy the (correct) OS
      buy the user licenses
      buy the access licenses
      buy the software
      buy the user rights to use software
      find ways to get what you need done, done.

      Linux model:
      download the OS
      install/setup/configure the OS
      find ways to get what you need done, done.

      Functionality of each is irrefutable, but one is a real pain in the ass, the other is just irritating at times.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    21. Re:No they won't by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      There is VLC. That is FOSS and the best video player I have ever used
      KeePass works well.
      BleachBit minus the interface
      Notepad++
      Calibre, minus the interface again. At least to can change it somewhat.
      On the just free side, you have WinAmp and Bulk Rename Utility

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    22. Re:No they won't by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      What I'd do if I needed Windows-only rich client software would be to (a) run it in a VM, or (b) run it on a dedicated and carefully firewalled 'Doze box, accessible via Remote Desktop only from specific machines inside my local network. Actually, pretty much, that's what I do now. My home systems run Linux, and when I need to, I remote into the office network using VPN + rdesktop (Linux terminal services client).

    23. Re:No they won't by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      Also, NextCloud. That was a fun RPi project.
      And qBitTorrent
      Deluge is decent enough if basic.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    24. Re:No they won't by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Informative

      I find Windows 10 needs to restart a hell of a lot. And it forces the restarts too. It will wake the machine up in the middle of the night just to restart without asking.

      While it's generally pretty good the lack of control over updates is immensely frustrating.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    25. Re:No they won't by jm007 · · Score: 1

      your tenacity is admirable and I'm sure many support your efforts; to say that anyone disagreeing with your assessment (and its risks) is 'not paying attention' is not persuasive and likely takes away from your end goal

      unsolicited advice: drop the personal attacks and you might find skeptics more open to your efforts

    26. Re: No they won't by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really? Have you missed the numerous stories of Windows 10 updates doing truly horrendous things to people's systems, including but not limited to losing data and causing them to fail to boot at all? How about having your system's settings reset so that you are never truly sure that it is set up the way you thought it was? It is absurd to suggest that Windows 10 is easier to maintain then Windows, since you literally have no control over it, having relinquished all control to Microsoft.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    27. Re:No they won't by DarkRookie2 · · Score: 1

      Windows 10 does suck. Have you not seen all the news stories of the utter failure this has been
      Really the only reason to stick with it is if you cannot change it at work or the like, or you play newer games and want the fancy graphics.

      Also, Linux/7 is at least 10% faster on the same hardware than 10 is.

      --
      http://progressquest.com/spoltog.php?name=Son+Of+Son+Of+DarkRookie
    28. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the "near future", huh? Only been hearing that for almost 20 years.

    29. Re:No they won't by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      SolidWorks dominates the low-end features modeling space, it's commonly used in modeling objects to be machined (which is what it's for) or 3d printed (it's good for that, too.) It also does the machining process, which is to say, it generates the code that's sent to the CNC machine. And there is nothing which is even vaguely close to it on Linux, and it does not work well under WINE. It's unfortunate that the developers haven't written a decently compliant application (those tend to work under WINE) but it's still something of a standard.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:No they won't by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The time you save with easier updates just gets spent sorting out other stuff. It really depends on the apps you use as well, for example Kicad seems to be better on Linux (side-by-side install is easier) but on the other hand setting up a decent AVR development environment is an annoying, manual process.

      In the end it probably comes down to which OS you are more familiar with, rather than either being much better than the other. They both have their frustrations and strengths.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    31. Re:No they won't by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      You clearly know nothing about engineering or how people use computers to do actual work. Can you recommend a software package for Linux that lets me model drawings and objects in three dimensions and simulate the physical forces applied to them?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    32. Re:No they won't by I-am-a-Banana · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is 100% what is wrong with the Linux scene. Every year for as long as I can remember I hear 20xx is the year of the Linux desktop. But the Linux desktop is never that close....

    33. Re:No they won't by hackertourist · · Score: 2

      I don't know if I'd characterize Solidworks as anything resembling 'low-end'. Maybe compared to CATIA...

    34. Re:No they won't by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Brand Rich Guy With IT Hireling(R)

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    35. Re:No they won't by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      If by work you mean spend 20% of your time waiting for Windows to finish updating, then yeah, Windows is for you.

      Really, WTF is in those updates that would require 7Gb?!!

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    36. Re: No they won't by kenh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So your mother is running a 10 year-old browser on a 10 year-old Linux kernel, on a 10 year-old PC?

      --
      Ken
    37. Re: No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Worst yo-mamma joke. Ever.

    38. Re:No they won't by Immerman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And so it has been. The Linux desktop has been thriving, it just hasn't gained dramatic market share, persistently hovering around the same tiny fraction as MacOS, for reasons that have very little to do with the Linux desktop itself.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    39. Re:No they won't by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Because none of my computers run Windows 10. If you aren't running Linux in 2019, you aren't paying attention.

      (or LTSB/LTSC)

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    40. Re:No they won't by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't know what they are sending! The system, the source code, is CLOSED. It could be sending a log of every website you ever visited, every keystroke, every document you have. You have no idea. And the data they collect can change at any time.

    41. Re:No they won't by Pascoea · · Score: 1
      Different thread:

      I am just stating facts. In return, people call me a "troll". But here are some facts: [followed by 1 fact and 6 opinions]

      This thread:

      Altium has sold out long time with their "cloud" product.

      I have no idea what "SolidWorks" is

      Thats nice

      Do you actually wonder why people would call you a troll? To summarize this thread: Here is my expert opinion on one piece of software. I've never even heard of a piece of software in a related space. Oh, a company uses this software? Cool story, bro. Yeah, sorry, 100% troll.

    42. Re:No they won't by Big+Boss · · Score: 1

      How about OnShape? It's web based, so that might cause other issues though.

    43. Re:No they won't by Ormy · · Score: 2

      A few years after win7 stops supporting most new games it'll be dead to a lot of diehard users. Hopefully games will run on linux by then.

    44. Re:No they won't by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Wait, SolidWorks is in a "related space" to Linux? I was under the impression that SolidWorks doesn't even run on Linux! You guys who call me a "troll" can't even form a coherent thought. How am I "trolling"? I just said that his not having SolidWorks on Linux is a personal problem. 99.999% of people don't need Solidworks (whatever that is).

    45. Re: No they won't by rnmartinez · · Score: 1

      Had to LOL at 20xx - should be thinking of software, but immediately thought of Mega Man.

    46. Re: No they won't by djbckr · · Score: 2

      I don't have mod points, so I'll just add a "me too" post: An old family friend got fleeced by one of those "Microsoft Support" scams and not only did he lose some money, his computer was pretty much useless. He was otherwise frugal and didn't want to get a new computer, but his computer took - not kidding - five minutes to boot up to be usable. After discussing with him his habits, I put Linux Mint on his computer. It's a slow computer, so it does take a minute for it to boot up, but it runs flawlessly and has for years. He's happy as can be and is able to talk to his kids/grandkids regularly now.

    47. Re:No they won't by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Oh, no - where will I find 7GB on my 500GB drive?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    48. Re:No they won't by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Please elaborate. In what way to they "own" it?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    49. Re: No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you would jump to that conclusion. I've been using Linux and still use it from time to time for software deving. I've been using linux since the days when Mandriva was called Mandrake. Since moved onto other distros of course since Mandriva hasn't been a thing in a while.

      But it's a very narrow use-case. You can't expect adoption unless you appeal to the masses.

      This is a REALLY hard to believe concept, especially amongst the slashdot community, but MOST people who use a desktop computer ARE NOT a software engineer or even remotely interested in IT. They don't have to. A lot of them are willing and paying customers, it's the major reason why pay-software companies are some of the most valuable companies in the world. Money talks, bullshit walks. Linux desktop is still in the "walks" phase. For the average consumers (you know, the crowd you need to please to gain that huge market share), asking them to open up a console and type commands means, no thanks, this shit sucks...

    50. Re:No they won't by tepples · · Score: 1

      What does Thunderbird lack as a replacement for Outlook?

    51. Re:No they won't by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Yes, if you need to use specific software then Linux may not be for you - but MacOS is in the same boat, and nobody mocks "the year of the MacOS desktop"

      When you get right down to it, most people don't actually need much software to get their job done. A web browser, a word processor, maybe a spreadsheet and a smattering of other job-specific programs. Linux has all of that, just maybe not the exact same software you're used to using on Windows.

      But that has nothing to do with Linux, or MacOS. That has to do with a certain company engaging in decades of often illegal abuse of their monopolistic position. If you insist on supporting their monopoly, then no - Linux is not for you.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    52. Re:No they won't by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Office integration perhaps?

      I have heard from some people that the integration between MS Office and Outlook allows for some very handy features - I've never heard such a claim in person though, and have only rarely met anyone who uses Outlook for anything that couldn't be done just as easily with Gmail, or any number of other alternatives.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    53. Re: No they won't by BringsApples · · Score: 1

      No, you do. I buy it for RDP, file sharing, DNS, DHCP, Domain controller, VMs, etc... Each has it's own of charging you for usages. With Linux, this is all always included. Also, I own the OS, can make changes to it, hell I can even resell it.

      --
      Politics; n. : A religion whereby man is god.
    54. Re:No they won't by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      If you aren't running Linux in 2019, you aren't paying attention.
      Hear, hear.
      Switching to Ubuntu may have had a learning curve associated with it, but no hurdles I couldn't eventually overcome -- and that's only because I'm not a 'typical' computer user. The 'average' computer user can more-or-less use it right out of the box.

    55. Re: No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is a REALLY hard to believe concept, especially amongst the slashdot community, but MOST people who use a desktop computer ARE NOT a software engineer or even remotely interested in IT.

      Exactly. Which is why they should use Linux.

      Nobody wants to spend time and money trying to fix Microsoft's garbage and botched updates!

      My Dad is not in IT, but switched to Xubuntu at my recommendation after Win7 pooped the bed. He says his effort spent maintaining the machine dropped to effectively zero and remains there. And he really liked Win7.

      I switch my Mom to Xubuntu after XP went EOL. She loves it and has zero problems. When she wanted another computer for her kitchen a year later, she insisted on Xubuntu even after I convinced her to play with a couple of Apple machines. When the SSD on her main PC died (Intel garbage) It took two hours to restore it; 1.5 hours of which was going to Microcenter to buy another SSD (SanDisk FTW) and then installing it. That's the sum-total of effort both machines have required since early 2014.

    56. Re:No they won't by harperska · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Linux model:
      download the OS
      install/setup/configure the OS
      Configure the OS
      Configure the OS again
      Break something
      Google which config file might control the weird behavior you are seeing.
      Search message boards for a possible solution
      Wade through countless 'me too' posts to see if anybody actually has a fix
      Try a solution someone gave for a problem that looks like it might be similar to yours
      Try a different proposed solution because the first one only made things worse
      Break something else
      Give up
      Reinstall the OS
      Repeat

    57. Re:No they won't by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Or, you want all your systems to more-or-less simply run, be usable by everyone you hire without substantial retraining, and to run basically every application or game without an issue?

      I mean, who'd want THAT in 2019?

      I know I'd much rather fuck around with with various builds, bad repositories, driver support, and having to command-line every goddanmned thing. Super way to spend my day, instead of running my business or playing games in the time I have available.

      --
      -Styopa
    58. Re:No they won't by Leuf · · Score: 1

      As far as video editing, DaVinci Resolve is a full featured competitor to Premiere and it has a Linux version. Also has a free version that will be good enough for most people.

    59. Re: No they won't by uncqual · · Score: 1

      Of course, if Linux really became a popular desktop OS for ordinary users, this old family friend would now fall victim "Linux National Support Center" scam. The reason these don't seem to exist is because there are so few Linux desktop users except techies that Linux scams are not as profitable as Windows scams.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    60. Re:No they won't by gander666 · · Score: 1

      My anecdote is different. My work laptop is Win10, and it gets rebooted about every 8 weeks when corp IT pushes a parcel of updates (but I will admit that many of these upgrades require 2-3 reboots).

      --
      Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
    61. Re:No they won't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      MS model
      Buy the OS
      Configure the OS
      Update the OS
      Re-Configure the OS
      Install necessary program
      Trouble-shoot why the program isn't working
      Pay someone to fix the issue
      Realize they can't fix the issue because MS reasons
      Buy new second-choice program to do necessary task
      Accept that things will sort of always be broken
      Buy new MS OS in hopes of things improving
      Realize none of your sort of working software works properly now
      Repeat ad-nauseum (Since 1988 at least)

    62. Re:No they won't by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I'd characterize Solidworks as anything resembling 'low-end'. Maybe compared to CATIA...

      That's the kind of thing I would call high-end, yeah.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    63. Re:No they won't by Nethead · · Score: 1

      And get the SolidWorks license server to run on *nix. You're lucky it stays up in Windows.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    64. Re:No they won't by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2

      the primary software that is used by nearly every employee for 80+% of their job requires IE to be the default browser

      I would quit if I were you.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    65. Re:No they won't by Interfacer · · Score: 1

      I manage several windows domains in a pharmaceutical plant. Each plant runs a SCADA system which requires its own AD. Windows 10 does not ignore group policy. I almost never walk to a machine.

      But if you administer systems in a large system, you really should set it up properly so that you control what gets installed, and what gets through the firewall, and which updates are approved, and how all security is configured. MS doesn't just 'decide to remote install some crap'. If stuff makes it onto your machines without your consent, they are not set up properly.

    66. Re:No they won't by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The very few times I've encountered Outlook use that went beyond basic email and calendar it turned out to be poorly done and confusing to recipients. The people who do this always struck me as the sort who had drunk deeply from the Microsoft Kool-aid fountain, as they're the same people who glowingly praise Sharepoint and other abominations.

    67. Re: No they won't by packrat0x · · Score: 1

      No offense, but if it's mission critical application... Locking yourself up in a specific OS (whatever it is) doesn't seem like a good idea/design.

      Finally, a truly insightful comment!

      --
      227-3517
    68. Re:No they won't by GrumpySteen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sure... "Windows" is the one installing Candy Crush. Not the users. Nope. They're completely innocent and definitely didn't have anything to do with it.

    69. Re:No they won't by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Uhhhh you DO know that it takes less than 30 seconds to turn off the crapware in 10...right? They even have free programs like "Shutup10" that will do it for you, its literally "clicky clicky" simple.

      Personally I'm sticking with 8.1 Pro plus ClassicShell, not because I can't take the 30 seconds to go "clicky clicky" on Win 10 but because 8.1 with ClassicShell gives me the nice UI of 7 with the speed and better SSD support of 10 with updates that are rock solid instead of alpha quality. Everything is fast, everything just works, and the only packets leaving my PC other than the ones I personally send are things I have authorized like my AV and program updates.

      You should really try it, purrs like a kitten and has been the most hassle free OS I've seen since XP X64 aka Win2K3 Workstation, just a great OS for getting your work done with the least amount of BS.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    70. Re: No they won't by _merlin · · Score: 1

      The professional UNIX workstation market evaporated when Windows became good enough. All that stuff moved to Windows when NT4 became good enough for a far more attractive price. Professional UNIX workstations were still better mind you, but a PC with Windows NT4 was so much cheaper and (perhaps just barely) good enough, so it became the rational choice.

    71. Re:No they won't by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Or you could just disable the aggregator job in the task scheduler.

      Not difficult, unlike trying to re-configure the audio in Debian.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    72. Re:No they won't by dbreeze · · Score: 1

      +5
        I'm old enough, and have been running Linux for long enough now, that I just do an internal :facepalm:, and nod sympathetically to the continuing woes of those still using Microsoft.

      --
      When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
    73. Re: No they won't by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about using internet explorer?

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    74. Re: No they won't by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Evidently you aren't smart at all. What people want is a web browser and email capability plus some kind of word processor for a smaller segment of "most." They want it to be fast and they don't want to do *any* maintenance. In other words they want a properly set up Linux system. They definitely do *not* want Windows.

      Unfortunately there are a bunch of fools like you running around telling bullshit lies about Linux. Because you are a "power user" you likely do spend some amount of time dickering with your system, but I know for a fact and from real world experience that if you give the average user a well configured Linux system they will thank you time and again for getting them away from "that awful Windows." They will not have to *ever* use the command line or perform any maintenance task. They will *never* download a program and find out the hard way that it was a Trojan Horse or other malware. They will *never* decide to power down their laptop at the coffee shop because they have an emergency and have their system tell them "fuck you bitch ... You ain't going nowhere for a good while." Seriously, get a clue.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    75. Re: No they won't by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      Until Windows 10 1809, Candy Crush was an install by default item. So yes, it was Windows which was at fault.

      Once the 1809 rollout is complete, Candy Crush should go away.

    76. Re:No they won't by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I run Linux, but I will in 2020 probably have to move my gaming-machine to Win10 (currently still win7). There will be no email, no non-gaming web-browsing, etc. on that machine to not feed the creeps in Redmond even more personal data. I will also keep a non-networked win10 VM around for MS Office (which I sometimes have to use), probably in a master-worker config, were the master gets all the updates, but the state gets copied to the non-networked worker before I give it access to any documents. Fortunately, you _can_ copy VMs easily. I hope that still works for win10...

      If not for gaming and MS office, I would have left windows behind a long time ago.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    77. Re:No they won't by gweihir · · Score: 1

      When you look at the naked OS, Linux beats Windows in everything. But when you take in the environment I agree to your statement.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    78. Re: No they won't by gweihir · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Automatic updates on Linux work...

      Well, if it is the right distro is used and they are set-up right. The last time I had a problem with one was about 7 years ago and it was something related to a custom boot-script, so technically my fault. Of course, when the old release goes out of service (Debian LTS currently gives you 5 years), you may want to update that and that is usually a manual process, but other than that you can fully automatize this and, unlike MS crap, it does not break.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    79. Re: No they won't by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I say you're not smart as you fail to recognize you live in a bubble fed by slashdot microchamber feeding things you want to hear while ignoring reality.

      You insult the GP as stupid but and assume everyone uses Linux by now and LOOVES Libreoffice as the next coming of Christ while it lacks features like pixel perfect text rendering that Word 2.0 had.

      People LOVE Office and Windows. They like their cute Free/Busy appointments reminders in Outlook. They like to reserve conference rooms with ease with Office 365.

      They want their shitty Walmart inkjet to plug in and just work. They want to kill people in Fortnight.

      To them that is Freedom. Linux and Libreoffice is tyranny.

      99% of PC users agree and do not want or need to deal with that shit storm called Gnome 3 or KDE.

      Linux had 20 years to win the desktop. We got one with Ubuntu 13 years ago. Then we killed ourselves with gnome 3, kde 4, pulse audio, etc.

      Linux is a server and IOT OS. Get real

    80. Re: No they won't by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Anything by Oracle ... In 2019 even?!?

    81. Re: No they won't by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Take the hairyfeey challenge? Take any Linux distro and upgrade 2 major versions and see if it still functions?

      Windows has a stable ABI unlike Linux so it breaks far less. The echo chamber on slashdot says otherwise but try it? Xorg and drivers will always fail between kernels and versions

    82. Re: No they won't by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Yeah douchebag ... Pixel perfect rendering in their word processor is a huge issue for most people. And what part of "properly configured" don't you understand? That printer works just fine because the OS was configured by me. I explicitly stated real world experience, not "stuff I read on Slashdot." If fortnite really is such an issue for the user it's called dual booting. The user decides at boot time if they want a toy or a computer. The coupe de gras? It is clearly you that gets all their knowledge and understanding of Linux and how it compares to Windows from the uninformed and intentionally misinforming "new age Slashdotter", aka the morons who don't belong on any highly technical forum, let alone one that is specifically for people who are Linux competent.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    83. Re: No they won't by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Some MS shills moderating, I see.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    84. Re: No they won't by Interfacer · · Score: 1

      If you dual boot, you need windows, the diskspace, and the license anyway.
      A properly configured Windows system works just as well as a properly configured linux system.

      An OS is just a platform for using the applications you need to get things done. Most people don't give a crap about OS wars. They just want to do the stuff they want to do. Dual booting is just annoying and pointless unless there is a real reason why you cannot use just 1 system.

      I've developed software on linux, and on windows. Both systems have strong and weak points.
      If you call Windows a toy, that just proves that you don't have the same skill level on windows as on linux.

    85. Re:No they won't by Interfacer · · Score: 1

      You don't have a firewall between your network and the internet to block anything that phones home?

    86. Re:No they won't by samwichse · · Score: 1

      My guess is the major system updates... like going to new build numbers?

    87. Re:No they won't by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Ok, I've switched to VLC for some time now. But...if VLC is so great, how come it does the following:

      I run a video full screen.

      The video ends.

      I end up with a green window covering 90% of the desktop. It can't be Alt-F4'd. It is forced on top of everything else so I can't even see what is running in Task Manager.

      The only way it goes away is I load -- from memory, mind you because the green monster is covering 90% of the screen -- another video in vlc. Then hit escape to get out of full screen. Then hit the stop button.

      I wish I was making all of that up.

      I'm not.

      It is really annoying. And I can't find an answer online.

      Latest VLC btw.

      --
      I come here for the love
    88. Re: No they won't by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

      No offence, but maybe you're just rubbish with Windows as your familiar home is unix?
      Just as Win admins are rubbish and lost in unix terminals.

    89. Re: No they won't by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

      Or, you could have just partitioned the drive in two, one for OS, the other for data.
      And then "lock / freeze" the OS partition against any changes using something like Deep Freeze.

    90. Re: No they won't by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Here most of us know how truly ridiculous your claims are.

      Only those of us here that are completely blind to the needs / wants of end users make that claim. Plenty of others (myself included) use Linux without ever considering recommending to many people for precisely the reason the GP claims.

      We get it. You are a nerd like the rest of us. You need to learn that this means you don't actually represent the needs of the 99% out there. We are the 1%.

    91. Re:No they won't by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      that windows keeps installing on my user's machines, despite being told not to in Group Policy. Or re-assigning the default browser away from Edge

      If you spend 30% of your time on this you're doing something VERY wrong. Candy crush is installing on your computer? What are you doing wrong? Certainly I've never seen it on any computer managed by group policy, and disabling it is controlled by a simple setting on Windows 10 Pro. Likewise the Edge default seems to only reset during feature updates. How frequently do you re-install windows / apply updates that are only released twice a year to even rank the Edge thing as an annoyance? And if it's that frequent why haven't you scripted resetting it?

      Work smart not hard.

    92. Re: No they won't by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. That's the perfect solution for the non-technical user. Did someone forget the premise? Yes ... Yes you did ... Now off you go ... Good boy!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    93. Re:No they won't by yuvcifjt · · Score: 1

      Let me guess, you use Android as your phone, Chrome as your browser, gmail for emails, and have your profile on facebook / linkedin ?

    94. Re:No they won't by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I find Windows 10 needs to restart a hell of a lot.

      Linux has to restart a hell of a lot too, people just don't do it and happily ignore the fact that major distros release kernel security patches every few weeks. Windows just forces is the issue.

      It will wake the machine up in the middle of the night just to restart without asking.

      An OS is incapable of waking the computer from its off state unless you allow it through through the BIOS.

    95. Re: No they won't by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Really? Have you missed the numerous stories of Windows 10 updates doing truly horrendous things to people's systems, including but not limited to losing data and causing them to fail to boot at all?

      Have you missed the numerous stories of that applying to people using Windows 10 applying large feature updates on day of release, and those updates being held within a matter of days? Every version of windows allows you to delay feature updates for a small period of time. Windows 10 Pro will let you do it for a year after the release of the stable business ready branch.

      Do you regularly screw cheap hookers without using a condom as well? Personally I don't like to live dangerously and chose not to using the tools at my disposal.

    96. Re:No they won't by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Personally I like getting work done without stupid mess around. You know how to do that? Just run the damn OS I need.

      But I get it. The Linux crowd does gravitate towards a solution that is as difficult and convoluted as possible.

    97. Re: No they won't by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You, as usual, are an idiot. Any dolt can use a properly configured Linux system. Indeed it is simpler to use Linux than Windows 10. Seriously, go kill yourself.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    98. Re: No they won't by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Bullshit ... Because she has been informed that she is not subject to be vulnerable to said malware ... Furthermore there is no company called "Linux" and so they can't claim to be calling on behalf of "Linux."

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    99. Re:No they won't by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      I need mostly Linux at home, precisely because it's the OS I need to get work done without "stupid mess around." I also need mostly Windows at work because that is what my employer, like most others, has chosen for me. And I need to be able to access any of my systems from any of the others. What I described above is a non-convoluted and non-difficult solution to that problem.

    100. Re:No they won't by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no. 10% of the drive is 13GB. If you don't have 7GB, you are probably starting to notice slowdowns. Pony up the $75 and get a better drive for your workflow, or at least offload 7GB of your cruft onto a cheap SD card or something. Pity party. If you won't modernize your hardware to keep up, then absolutely, running Linux is a good option for you.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    101. Re:No they won't by Ormy · · Score: 1

      Why not? When windows compatible NES emulators became useful I was happy to toss my NES. When Playstation (1&2) emulators became good enough I was happy to toss those too. When faster hardware is cheap enough that I can run all my currently win7 software in an emulator (i.e. virtual machine) on a linux box (including games) then I will be happy to toss win7. Are you saying people should cling to every software platform/OS they've ever owned even if something better AND backwards-compatible replaces it?

    102. Re: No they won't by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      All you did was prove you know nothing about Linux.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    103. Re:No they won't by demon+driver · · Score: 1

      I agree that much depends on the apps you use. Not so much with the familiarity aspect. On the contrary, I'm perpetually astounded how easily long-time Windows users in my surroundings have switched to Linux who not even had any kind of IT background to begin with.

  2. is that a way to disable updates? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    by manually ensuring that you don't have that 'required space' ?

    I bet there will be nag dialogs endlessly until you 'let them' do an update to your system.

    man, I hate win10. we are forced to use it at work but thankfully I can do 99% of my daily stuff with linux. those who must use win10 - I feel sorry for you. its not a fun experience having to be the 'operator' of a computer you don't really own anymore..

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:is that a way to disable updates? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is funny how Windows 10 has differed from Windows 7 as time has gone by. For example, Windows 7 ran OK on a regular hard drive. Windows 10 -needs- a SSD to be able to function. The minimum size has grown as well, where W10 pretty much needs 120+ gigs of space with all the Market and user installed shoverware, and that's before adding relevant apps.

      Maybe if Microsoft made this a whole new OS release, this would be understandable. They could set requirements where they could have a hidden partition with 20+ gigs tucked away for both recovery and updates. This also would make a reset/reinstall easier, as the entire C: filesystem could entirely be blown away, not just deleting c:\Users, program directories, and the Windows directory, ensuring that no malware is on the new filesystem. In addition when the machine is reinstalled or refreshed, all updates can be copied, so the machine doesn't need to go through multiple Windows update and reboot cycles to work.

      Best of all would be having Windows be entirely hypervisor based, so a Windows desktop would be a VM, and a "reinstall" would just be starting, loading and provisioning a VM image. No fretting with bare metal.

    2. Re:is that a way to disable updates? by Freischutz · · Score: 1, Interesting

      by manually ensuring that you don't have that 'required space' ?

      I bet there will be nag dialogs endlessly until you 'let them' do an update to your system.

      man, I hate win10. we are forced to use it at work but thankfully I can do 99% of my daily stuff with linux. those who must use win10 - I feel sorry for you. its not a fun experience having to be the 'operator' of a computer you don't really own anymore..

      To be fair that's a lose lose situation for Microsoft. Be aggressive about updates and the user is annoyed, let the users install updates at their own leisure and they get hopping mad when their computer is infected by malware because of an un-patched vulnerability they could have fixed by installing in a timely fashion the updates that they have been putting off installing for weeks. At least you're getting the damn updates.

    3. Re:is that a way to disable updates? by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I have no Win10 box handy to determine for sure the answer to your question, but so far as the 'space requirement' goes, Microsoft has adopted a 'our way or the highway' attitude, so I think it's probably hard-coded into the OS, or at best you'd have to hack the Registry to change it. Without knowing the details, they might even create a separate partition just to contain downloaded updates. Don't know though.

      You can go into Administrative Tools/Services, shut down the Windows Update service, and set it to 'Disabled', but that's the nuclear option; you won't have ANY updates that way, so it's all-or-nothing. Also, for all I know, they've locked you out of changing the startup settings for the Windows Update service, so you'd have to hack the Registry (if possible; even Registry entries have Security settings that can keep you out of things Microsoft doesn't want you changing) to stop it from starting up. If you can't do that then you'd have to do something extreme like pull the drive, find the .exe file for Windows Update, and change the security settings on the file so that even System is set to 'Deny' for executing the file. Lots of hoops to jump through for something that should, rightly, be entirely up to the User to control. This sort of 'strategy' from Microsoft, to take control of your computer away from you, is why so many of us hate it and hate them and have switched to Linux, by the way. We feel we should have the final say in how our own machine is administered, not Microsoft.

  3. I already fixed this. by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    I fixed this issue over a year ago by putting Debian in Windows place. Windows update hasn't been an issue yet,

  4. Yippee! by petes_PoV · · Score: 4, Funny
    So by the simple act of ensuring there is less than 7GB free for Microsoft to reserve, I can put a stop to all these annoying and inconvenient updates that keep getting in the way?

    Great news to start the year.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  5. Trying to create a more stupid user by brxndxn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a computer enthusiast since the DOS days, I so much hate Microsoft's Windows 10 philosophy. Every move they make is one where Microsoft attempts to chip away at a user's ownership of his or her computer. Microsoft creates a new problem by taking away a user setting - like deciding exactly when he or she has the time to update the computer or their work is sufficiently at a stopping point to risk an update. In doing so, Microsoft introduces a whole host of new issues such as temporarily bricking users' devices, rebooting in the middle of their work, running the hard disk full, or causing updates to run when a user really needs to get out of the office. Then, in order to fix the problem they created, they take more control away from the user and allocate unusable user space just for Microsoft to have extra space for more bloated updates.

    The paranoid part of me doesn't believe Microsoft is doing this to fix the update problem at all. Instead, they're allocating 'hidden space' on the drive to capture user sensitive data and store it for later uploads to Microsoft when the laptop/desktop is connected to the Internet.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
    1. Re:Trying to create a more stupid user by ITRambo · · Score: 2

      It seems like Microsoft is unwilling to fix lame code let into the OS because they fired 10k QA engineers to save money. Instead, they're patching the patches that were created with useless crap was put into Windows 10. Windows 10 is becoming as unreliable as Windows 3.1.

    2. Re:Trying to create a more stupid user by Narcocide · · Score: 2

      The paranoid part of me doesn't believe Microsoft is doing this to fix the update problem at all. Instead, they're allocating 'hidden space' on the drive to capture user sensitive data and store it for later uploads to Microsoft...

      You're on the right track but there's no reason it has to be this clever of a reason. Most likely they're just reserving 7GB of free space because they've targeted that as the demographic most likely to be prodded into buying a whole new machine when Windows Update soaks up 100% of the free 6GB on their harddrive for a 7GB update that would brick their computer anyway.

    3. Re:Trying to create a more stupid user by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      The paranoid part of me doesn't believe Microsoft is doing this to fix the update problem at all. Instead, they're allocating 'hidden space' on the drive to capture user sensitive data and store it for later uploads to Microsoft when the laptop/desktop is connected to the Internet.

      The paranoid part of me wonders if this is the start of some kind of trend where it's basically expected that some largeish portion of user-purchased hardware -- storage, compute, connectivity is expected to be given over completely to its primary software vendor to support their business model. Whether it's mining cryptocurrency, providing distributed storage, obtaining extremely local telemetry (local RF monitoring, weather monitoring, traffic/geolocation, etc) and so on.

      I mean, we're already partway there. Maps applications phone home to provide traffic congestion, crypto mining (albeit mostly malware-oriented) exists, Windows 10 has its "download and provide updates to local computers" settings, etc.

      Maybe it becomes like commercials, part of the expected bargain for "free" stuff, which is also largely the basis for large scale "free" internet services in exchange for personal information.

      Maybe it's something you buy your way out of, at least partially -- pay for Windows Deluxe Pro, and you buy down the amount of local resources you're expected to hand over to Microsoft for their cloud computing environment.

    4. Re:Trying to create a more stupid user by Calydor · · Score: 1

      So by getting Windows 7 to run on my new machine despite the system drive being an SSD I've managed to go back to having Obama as president despite not even being American?

      I think your analogy kinda ran off track.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:Trying to create a more stupid user by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      The paranoid part of me doesn't believe Microsoft is doing this to fix the update problem at all. Instead, they're allocating 'hidden space' on the drive to capture user sensitive data and store it for later uploads to Microsoft when the laptop/desktop is connected to the Internet.
      Hear, hear.
      Remember: It's not 'paranoia' if what you're saying is true, and it very likely is. When your OS is feeding you ads right on your desktop and you have NO way to stop it, then just like Facebook, Your Personal Data has very likely become a 'product' that they sell to advertisers. Them, them, fuck them, I say.

    6. Re:Trying to create a more stupid user by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Maybe the reason why I don't know how off the top of my head to do that is I do not use Windows 10 at home and only had to be subjected to it in my last job, where there were never any ads to begin with. Be a dumb cuck and use Windows 10 all you like though, I'll be over here using Ubuntu and not giving a fuck.

    7. Re:Trying to create a more stupid user by hai_Priesty · · Score: 1

      It strangely reminds me of career politicians that keeps on generating duplicating and often useless laws on the slightest provocation. Instead of using enforcing an existing assault laws against thugs that had beaten up a bus driver, some lawmakers had a career boost (and massive ego boost) by creating "a law that prevents the public from assaulting a public transport driver".

      It's largely about controlling your subjects.

  6. ms incompetence by NikeHerc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a perfect example of why I have been ms-free since July 4th, 2018, and a big shout-out to Ubuntu for helping me be ms-free.

    If a company as big as ms can't check for free space prior to an o.s. update, they don't deserve to be in the business of providing operating systems.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    1. Re:ms incompetence by fbobraga · · Score: 2

      I'm in a Windows-free (except for desktops on some works...) since 2007 - I'm an ex http://serpro.gov.br/ worker: even the desktop on my work there was Ubuntu-based!

  7. 32gb flash drives? by citylivin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    With SSD's being around $100 for a samsung 256gb drive, i doubt anyone is deploying less than 128 these days.

    Who the hell would ship a computer with a 32gb ssd? windows itself needs that much to even install! much less run. 128gb has been too small for a few years now!

    There are also some tricks you can use to free up space. One i learned recently will clean up the stupid windows installer directory pretty well. i personally freed up 40gb on my work machine.

    Download the windows installer cleanup utility, then run MSIZAP.exe G! to clean the directory

    If you get an error, delete all the registry keys under:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Installer\UserData

    reference: http://wyang0.blogspot.com/201...

    --
    As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    1. Re:32gb flash drives? by NotFamous · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, even to this day there are many Windows devices sold with 32GB of MMC storage - tablets, cheap laptops, and media devices to connect to your TV. I really believe there should be a class-action lawsuit against these devices as you will shortly run into a wall with these computers. It reminds me of all the Android devices that were sold with 4GB of storage (2.5GB used by the OS), which run into the same problem.

      --
      Some settling may occur during posting.
    2. Re:32gb flash drives? by Blue23 · · Score: 2

      Who the hell would ship a computer with a 32gb ssd? windows itself needs that much to even install! much less run. 128gb has been too small for a few years now!

      I won a Win10 Trekstor Primebook, little notebook with the specs of a wimpy chromebook or tablet. 32GB ssd, 4GB RAM. It don't want to have to invest more than the thing is worth to me in order to keep up with Windows updates.

      Had to connect a USD drive to get the 2018 April update on. No way there's 7GB free space on it even after an aggressive cleaning.

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    3. Re:32gb flash drives? by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      And if you choose to go with someone other than Samsung, like AData or Kingston, the prince is even better. It's only about $45 Canadian for a 240 GB SSD. Which makes it even more insane. Who's using eMMC storage when a proper SSD is so cheap.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:32gb flash drives? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Lots of netbooks hitting the market these days have 16-32GB eMMC..

    5. Re:32gb flash drives? by Deathlizard · · Score: 2

      If I remember correctly, Microsoft had this OEM deal on Windows 10 where the OS was free if the hardware met certain minimum specs. I believe that 32GB of HDD space was one of the requirements. Because of this, a ton of desktops and laptops were made with this spec in order to maximize profits. That's why there's so many of them out there.

      If this is true then its a problem of their own doing.

    6. Re:32gb flash drives? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The Dell Inspiron 11-3162 is cheap, but it only has 32GB of storage. I uses EMMC flash (Hynix HBG4e) which is dog-ass-slow!. In fact, it might be the same type of memory found in a normal USB flash drive. IOPS is like that of a failing 5400RPM IDE drive. And that was for at least 5 that I worked on*

      *Not my idea, don't ask why they were purchased.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:32gb flash drives? by mejustme · · Score: 2

      With SSD's being around $100 for a samsung 256gb drive, i doubt anyone is deploying less than 128 these days.

      Bought my teenage son a DELL 3-in-1 laptop in October 2018. Came with a 32 GB SSD.

      After he turned it on, Windows attempted to download some updates. Filled up the hard drive. We spent a couple of days trying to fix it, removing default installed apps, rolling back updates. In the end it was a lost cause. I finally convinced him to let me install Ubuntu on it, which makes me happier since all my home computers run Ubuntu.

      Now most of the disk is free versus having zero disk space available. I found it incredible to see Windows take up 100% of a 32 GB drive and then complain it had run out of room.

    8. Re:32gb flash drives? by urusan · · Score: 1

      What about computers from before SSDs becoming that cheap?

    9. Re:32gb flash drives? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      With SSD's being around $100 for a samsung 256gb drive

      Can you tell me how I can install one of those in my glued together tablet?

  8. In all fairness by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
    In all fairness, this idea really doesn't sound too bad. Granted, you have less space for your own stuff on cramped storage devices, but then the choice is "store your stuff locally and get no updates", or "don't have your stuff locally and get updates".

    Most of these cramped storage devices, can handle SD cards and most of them are intended to be used with cloud storage.

    I have one of those: a eMMC based Chinese el-cheapo tablet. (Chuwi Hi10 Plus) Technically it has 64GB eMMC, IIRC, but it also has an android partition and many other partitions I don't really know what they do. The Win10 partition is something like 48GB. That said, eMMC based machines are so very slow, I would recommend never getting any. I heard more modern eMMC is better...

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:In all fairness by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So ... the difference is basically that I'd instead have a choice? Because now it's locked into "don't have your stuff locally and get updates".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:In all fairness by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Yes. Except the people who usually get these devices don't understand the choice and stay unpatched and unsupported... it alsi signals to OEMs that 32GB eMMC won't cut it any more.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    3. Re:In all fairness by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of it being a toggle, but having it on by default. I'm not against it being required for a little while either. One less thing to manage.

    4. Re:In all fairness by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Then how about making patching the default value that you can turn off with some powrshell command that you certainly can't accidentally stumble upon without REALLY wanting to know it?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  9. Finally...! by ddtmm · · Score: 2

    A way to prevent automatic updates.

  10. Re:Flash-drive PC's? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    I've found that even 128GB is often not enough just to run a desktop. Windows 10 + updates + Microsoft Office + updates takes ~100G. Not sure how you can even sell a Win10 computer with 32GB since 30-40GB is Windows 10 alone and that can easily go beyond 40 or 50GB during updates.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  11. Will this 7GB be added to disk requirement specs? by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2

    Or will it be something that the consumer "finds out" after starting to use Windows 10?

  12. Re:Flash-drive PC's? by willaien · · Score: 1

    Installers doing a streamlined minimal install build of windows 10 can probably squeeze it in.

  13. Worse than Chrome OS or Android? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Nothing is more critical than keeping mega corporations from taking your data and spying on you.

    Laptop and detachable computers sold in big box stores tend to come with one of three operating systems: Windows (which spies on its users), Chrome OS (which spies on its users), and Android with Google Play (which spies on its users). Though some can be coaxed to run third-party replacement operating systems, they aren't warranted to do so. In fact, many models have severe problems with broken or missing drivers when running anything but Windows (such as the ASUS Transformer Book T100TA, as reviewed by a Debian volunteer). Which is the least of three evils?

    Or does Apple deserve a monopoly?

    1. Re:Worse than Chrome OS or Android? by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

      Or does Apple deserve a monopoly?

      No one, especially Apple, deserves a monopoly.

      --
      Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
    2. Re:Worse than Chrome OS or Android? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Evil is evil. You don't have to be limited to 3 choices. We used to have personal computers.

    3. Re:Worse than Chrome OS or Android? by tepples · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be limited to 3 choices.

      What are the other choices? Do they involve a severely restricted set of screen sizes and having to buy a laptop without first having first seen its keyboard and screen? System76 currently doesn't offer anything smaller than 13 inches, and there aren't any System76 dealers in my home town.

    4. Re:Worse than Chrome OS or Android? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      You can run Linux on many systems and laptops. I am not doing your research.

    5. Re:Worse than Chrome OS or Android? by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      But for how long? I gave up on running Linux on my laptop because you could never tell from one update to the next which parts would work and which wouldn't. One update my broadcom wireless would work fine, next nada, one patch my APU worked great, next YouTube felt like trying to watch video on a Via Chrome from 1997, and the Asmedia USB 3 was as unpredictable as the weather.

      Linux is great on servers because server hardware is old and barebone, no wireless, if it even has a GPU or sound its some ancient chip that has been in service for ages and is as common as dirt, its really not that hard to support servers as its about as bog standard as bog standard can be. With laptops and desktops where there is just a constant stream of new chipsets, iGPUs and APUs, a bazillion wireless variants? Its damn hard to support that much gear reliably and consistently and frankly with Linux the money just isn't there as the big corps like Red Hat have zero fucks to give about desktop support.

      So sorry but with laptops and desktops you are just better off with Windows or ChromeOS where the driver support and stability is just better, there just isn't enough manpower dedicated to all the funky chips to make Linux a good choice for many.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    6. Re:Worse than Chrome OS or Android? by Interfacer · · Score: 1

      Sure you can run linux. But noone cares about running an OS in the real world. They want to run their applications. And there are many applications that don't run on linux.

  14. Block updates at router? by DigressivePoser · · Score: 1

    This and "telemetry" uploads to MS are the things keeping me away from Windows 10. As one AC posted, there are several watchdog processes that keep the whole update mechanism functional. Has anyone had luck with blocking updates with firewall rules?

  15. Re:But are YOU now paying attention to this? by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Of course!

  16. Solution by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

    Best keep my computer full so the update fails then

    --
    Wanna buy a shirt?
    https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
  17. Just delete something temporal by Gabest · · Score: 2

    Like hiberfil.sys or empty the browser cache. If you can't find 7GB, you are doing it wrong.

    1. Re:Just delete something temporal by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      The hibernation files is the exact same size as your system RAM. So, that works if you've got 8GB to start with.

      Honestly, I think this is a good thing with modern SSD where they (Samsung for example) recommend you over-provision free disk space to ensure proper wear leveling of the NAND flash. There's no reason why this 7GB of free space couldn't also be used in this regards to extend the life of the SSD while not in use.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  18. Re:Flash-drive PC's? by nctritech · · Score: 2

    Windows 10 with compactos enabled and the program files folders manually compacted with /EXE:LZX uses something like 9GB total; then add pagefile, swapfile, hiberfile and whatever is in the Users folders. Base Win10 can be cut down pretty far if you know what you're doing, especially if you're dropping to PowerShell and using Remove-AppxProvisionedPackage to toss out all the extra non-store non-important crap like ZuneMusic and ZuneVideo and OneNote and People that are all otherwise non-removable. Toss in a generous dose of admin-run cleanmgr and a little "dism /online /cleanup-image /startcomponentcleanup /resetbase" to discard all update uninstallers and backup files and you'll have a neatly trimmed system. I've gotten a "32GB" (29.8 GiB minus boot/recovery partitions = more like 28.5 GiB) to have about 14 GiB of free space with all the things mentioned above, no user data, and no software installed.

    It's possible to reduce this further by turning off paging, hibernation, and fast startup (which should lose all three of those big hidden special files I mentioned) but there are several reasons you probably should not do those things unless you're ready for extra grey hair.

    With newer Win10 builds they're shoving an 800GB recovery partition at the end of the disk; you can delete this in diskpart or Linux, expand the main partition in Disk Management (diskmgmt.msc) to suck up the extra free space, then in an admin command prompt go "reagentc /enable" to have Windows fix recovery mode by putting the recovery files in the main Windows partition instead, reclaiming a decent amount of unused space and overhead in the now-gone recovery partition.

    Of course, once the machine is in the hands of someone that can't babysit the toddler that is Windows 10, it's going to fill up faster than you can say "how big were hard drives in 1992 again?" and Microsoft will rape Nanking way too hard, where Nanking is the name of your capacity-free HP Stream 11.

  19. Not such a terrible concept .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Obviously, there's plenty of Windows 10 hate to go around, especially here on Slashdot.

    But given the constantly decreasing price of storage per megabyte (and faster read/write times for it!), it doesn't seem like a bad idea at all for the OS to simply reserve the amount it would take to do any OS upgrade, and keep it safe from being used up by other programs or user data.

    Honestly, I bet millions of Window laptops are out there right now, with at LEAST this much storage space already partitioned off for some kind of OEM "recovery" partition that most people will never find worthwhile to use? HP, Dell and others love to configure their systems like that. But for people not knowledgeable enough to blow away the whole partition structure before doing a clean installation of Windows? A lot of them now have a machine running Windows 8 or 10, but with as much as 40GB or so wasted on some recovery partition that would bring them back to Windows 7 if they actually used it. In other cases, it would just restore the PC to its original state, full of useless crapware that was bundled with it, plus an OS that needs 50+ update patches to be re-downloaded to get it current again.

    1. Re:Not such a terrible concept .... by willaien · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That ignores that cheap, budget devices are sold with 32GB or 64GB of storage. They aren't expandable. Remember that Windows 10 is _supposed_ to run on more than just high end desktops.

    2. Re:Not such a terrible concept .... by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      But, see, Microsoft doesn't care about what You want, they only care about ensuring They have control of Your computer. Your ability to actually use it in any way meaningful to you is secondary to that, that should be clear to anyone at this point.

    3. Re:Not such a terrible concept .... by Arashi256 · · Score: 1

      For low-end laptops that come with 32GB eMMC storage and 2-4GB RAM, they almost always have an SD card slot that supports at least 128GB cards if not more. So stating that all these devices "aren't expandable" as if it were an absolute fact is bullshit. Seriously, go check laptops on Amazon in the £150 - £275 price range and actually check the hardware details. I'll wait.

    4. Re:Not such a terrible concept .... by willaien · · Score: 1

      The base storage itself isn't expandable. Sure, they might have an SD card, but good luck getting windows to use a removable storage device to do windows updates from.

    5. Re:Not such a terrible concept .... by jgdnavy · · Score: 1

      Actually, now you can download a Windows 10 install media creator direct from Microsoft. It may be missing some drivers, but you can get those from the manufacturer's site, and should be updating them anyway when doing a recovery install. On the flip side, the Microsoft solution doesn't contain the vendor specific bloatware, just the Microsoft bloat.

  20. Wow, got a problem fix something else? by kamakazi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So Window Update doesn't check the size of the update and make sure there is enough space before downloading and installing it, so instead of fixing Windows Update we will just reserve 7G (SEVEN Gig!?!?! I had a full OS, and all of Microsoft Office, and my other software on a 105MB hard drive back in the day - but I digress) which will only be used when there is a major update instead of JUST FIXING WINDOWS UPDATE.

    It is simple math. I realize with dynamic updates you probaby can't make an exact prediction of the space needed for the rollback repository etc., but you can know the actual update file sizes, and you can make a conservative guess on the in-process size, just check, if there isn't enough space don't even do the download. Nag the user about it all you want, just don't actualy start the process until you have room.

    And if they actually need 7G now, what happens next year when the updates are bigger?

    It's funny, I am sick of MacOS as they continue to de-Unix and get in my way with every update, so I am switching, but for some reason I never even considered switching to Windows.

    --
    "Proximity to wonder has blunted our perception and appreciation of it" --Tim Hartnell in 'Exploring ARTIFICIAL INTELLI
    1. Re:Wow, got a problem fix something else? by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 2

      So Window Update doesn't check the size of the update and make sure there is enough space before downloading and installing it, so instead of fixing Windows Update we will just reserve 7G

      To be fair, this does make sense.

      Just because there are 7G+ of free space at the start of an upgrade process doesn't mean that the user isn't busy copying/moving large files around, or otherwise changing the amount of disk space available. OS installs - which these are - should be reliable above all other considerations.

      Also, the fine article makes it clear that the reserved space is in fact used by the OS for temporary files and other ephemeral content, so the space isn't actually lost.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    2. Re:Wow, got a problem fix something else? by Solandri · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand. The problem wasn't that Win 10 was failing to update because you didn't have enough enough free storage space. The problem was some people were managing to prevent Win 10 from updating by limiting the amount of free storage space.

      My laptop had a problem with the 2017 Fall Creators update. It turned the icons for roughly a third of my installed programs and associated files into default icons, making it impossible to tell them apart. The correct icons were selectable in Windows' app settings, but they would still remain the default icons on the desktop and in File Explorer. It was impossible to tell which files were things like Office documents. So I reverted to the previous version of Win 10, and disabled the Windows Update service and set my connection to metered to prevent it from downloading and auto-installing the FC update.

      About 6 months later I started getting warning messages that support for the Win 10 version I was on was ending, and that I must update. I tried updating, my icons were still broken, so reverted back as usual, sending a feedback report that the update was breaking my icons (hoping that they'd fix the problem at their end). Well, at some point it began ignoring my connection being set to metered, and would automatically re-enable the Windows Update service to push the new version (by now the Spring 2018 update, which still caused the same problem). It would update, I'd roll it back so I could get work done, and it'd update again every time I forgot to suspend the laptop and stepped away for a couple hours. It downloaded the update so many times I had to turn off my cable modem because I was in danger of going over my ISP's monthly quota. I had to use my phone for anything Internet-related.

      Microsoft doesn't want you using old versions of Win 10. They will do anything they can to force you onto a current version. That is their primary objective here. Merely checking that there's enough free space for an update is not enough, because then someone could use that to block the update. The update must install for them to be happy.

      (And if you're wondering if I ever found a fix for the icon problem, yes I did but it wasn't really a fix. I had to uninstall and reinstall every program whose icons were broken. Except after the update I couldn't uninstall the affected programs. The uninstall would bomb out with an unspecified error. I had to update, write down a list of each program whose icons were broken, revert the update, then uninstall each program on the list one by one, then reinstall each of them, then allow the Win 10 to update.)

    3. Re:Wow, got a problem fix something else? by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      I have an ongoing similar problem. About every five logins, all my icons/tiles will revert to the default in the Metro/Start Menu. I have to logout and log back in a couple of times, or reboot a couple of times, for it to resolve the issue.

  21. MIKKKRO$OFT?!?! by Merk42 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    M$ BAD! I didn't RTFA or RTFS, BUT, BAD M$ BAD!! Now to wait and get +5 insightful!!

  22. Re:the silver lining? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    Oh, you think having less than 7GB of free space is gonna stop Windows from trying to fill it? Good luck with that.

  23. And how we laughed at that Win 95 joke! by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
    Remember the good old days? "It is called Windows 95 because it is going to ship in 95 floppy disks, haa haah haa!" And we thought it was funny.

    95 Floppy Disks would store less than a quarter of a Gig.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  24. Re:Flash-drive PC's? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Any chance to get one of those builds?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Re:Flash-drive PC's? by willaien · · Score: 1

    Worth looking at something like ntlite.

    https://docs.microsoft.com/en-...

    System builders start off with something like this, but they will likely either have access to other tools or use something like ntlite to slim things down.

  26. Incremental updates are a lost art at Microsoft by hackertourist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Like the last time I needed to make a change to MS Office: I wanted to install a Czech language pack for MS Word. This should be a few MB worth of dictionary and hyphenation info. The Office installer proceeds to remove my entire MS Office installation, redownload 500 MB and reinstall the entire fucking Office suite. IIRC it nuked all my preferences too.
    The icing on the cake was that it replaced the Start menu shortcuts for all Office programs with new versions in Czech, even though my system language is set to English.

    1. Re:Incremental updates are a lost art at Microsoft by qubezz · · Score: 2

      Which is how Windows 10 "updates" work, your entire OS is nuked and a new installation is installed, with fresh "app store" hardware drivers and game cruft, and barely the settings that the upgrader understands restored.

  27. Well, I suppose when your computer stops booting by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    due to the sheer number of viruses and spyware on it that will stop those updates....

    Seriously, I don't think it's possible to run a modern OS connected to the Internet without regular security updates.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  28. That's one way to look at it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    another is that most people don't like computers. Computers are tools to them. They hold the same feelings towards a computer that most techies hold to a spanner wrench. Less so, really, since your spanner wrench doesn't break all the time due to complex maintenance requirements.

    Microsoft isn't likely to hide data mining. Again, most people don't care about privacy. They've got bigger problems in their lives, like paying rent, getting healthcare or figuring out how to save enough for college. And you know what, they're right. Privacy violations aren't the principle tool used to control and oppress people, as others have long since noticed

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  29. Get me the software and I'll switch by sjbe · · Score: 2

    Because none of my computers run Windows 10. If you aren't running Linux in 2019, you aren't paying attention.

    Really? Or maybe it's that linux literally doesn't have critical software I need to do my job nor any suitable substitutes. I'm an accountant and an engineer. (not as weird a combo as it sounds) There literally is no functional equivalent to even something as basic as QuickBooks on linux. Never mind our MRP software, CAD software, various other engineering software and other tools that are indispensable to our work. Even when there are substitutes they generally are crap.

    Believe me I'd switch to linux in a heartbeat if it were actually practical to do so but it isn't and very likely won't be any time soon in my day job. Works great for some of our servers though. At work we run Windows 10 for our desktops and while it has its warts, it gets the job done. Don't love it but linux desktop options aren't making me swoon with envy unfortunately.

    1. Re:Get me the software and I'll switch by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      So the people deciding your job / your tools, which could include you, have made peace with the fact that Microsoft will spy on you. Nothing wrong with making peace.

      For most of your private uses, you could still switch to Linux - in a year if not a heartbeat. You have not mentioned any reasons why you can't - although you will be the only one to lose if you can't. If you do switch, Microsoft gets their grubby hands on your private data with much more difficulty. What's to not like about the plan ?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  30. Made up "facts" by sjbe · · Score: 5, Informative

    For example, Windows 7 ran OK on a regular hard drive. Windows 10 -needs- a SSD to be able to function.

    Don't know where you got this made up fact. I'm typing this on a PC that has Windows 10 and does not have an SSD and it runs just fine. (well... as fine as Windows ever runs)

    The minimum size has grown as well, where W10 pretty much needs 120+ gigs of space with all the Market and user installed shoverware, and that's before adding relevant apps.

    More bullshit. I'll agree it's pretty bloated but it demonstrably does not require that much space. If you have that much shovel-ware installed, switch PC vendors. On the machine I'm running right now Windows takes about 45GB of space. You can argue that's still too much and I'd probably agree with you but it's 1/3 of what you are claiming.

    If you want to bash Windows there are plenty of opportunities that do not require making up nonsense.

    1. Re:Made up "facts" by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      I have experienced the same as ctilsie242 myself.

      Running on an entry level AMD C-50 series Dual 1.0GHZ, an SSD was required to run Windows 10. I've seen that on many a "moderate" to "entry-level" machine. Windows 10 seems to be heavy on disk utilization on mid to lower tier desktops, especially following a boot cycle. Moderately high to high end machines can apparently compensate due to the significant amount of resources available. It may just be that Windows 10 was optimized for higher end machines and SSDs. Machines that are never powered off probably not suffer as severely either.

      On the disk space front, between Volume Shadow Copies, and the size of program installations require a disk capacity greater than 120GB to be usable. This isn't a Windows 10 problem per se, but Windows 10 itself does require at least 64GB to operate once you factor in the 6 month upgrades, temp files, page file variances, and especially fragmentation and performance of physical disks, etc. This leaves the remainder of the drive for applications. Office is no small install, and files created using Office are larger than they used to be as well. Image resolutions have increased, video resolutions have increased, anything embedded in say a PowerPoint or OneNote, plus the caches for OneDrive and DropBox. It adds up. Eventually a smaller physical disk simply isn't going to be able to sling things onto the platter without incurring a hit waiting for the drive to spin back around to find a 2 meter womp rat exhaust port sized piece of unallocated space.

      Want to put anything on there besides the basics, and you definitely need more than the 120GB minimum for platters. I don't even use 120GB Windows 10 SSD based devices for anything other than streaming and remote desktop. I don't run anything local on devices with so little capacity. That is largely due to bandwidth being limited to 5mbps, making it so nightmarishly slow to swap out items on such a small device, that I don't even bother.

    2. Re:Made up "facts" by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Don't know where you got this made up fact. I'm typing this on a PC that has Windows 10 and does not have an SSD and it runs just fine. (well... as fine as Windows ever runs)

      Try it again when Win 10 is installing an unschedulable automatic update. I wasted 2 hours at a client's office because a HDD Win 10 system decided to start updating just as I began troubleshooting. After struggling to do anything with the thrashing HDD for over an hour, I gave up and told the client I was wasting his money trying to fix a computer which was updating. I'd visit the next client on my list that day, and be back at his office later after a few hours.

      Win 7 at least gave you the option of picking when it would install updates. The only thing you had to watch for on HDD systems were virus scans which were incorrectly scheduled during working hours.

      More bullshit. I'll agree it's pretty bloated but it demonstrably does not require that much space. If you have that much shovel-ware installed, switch PC vendors. On the machine I'm running right now Windows takes about 45GB of space.

      Actually, I'd agree that 120 GB is the absolute minimum I'd recommend for a Win 10 system drive. I've been using 256 GB SSDs as a minimum on client machines for a couple years now. Yes Win 10 by itself usually only takes about 30-40 GB (though I've run across one system where it bloated to 75 GB - it gets bigger over time). The problem is when it does one of its forced major updates, it keeps the old version around for a few days in case you decide to revert to the previous version. That Windows.old folder is usually 20-25 GB. So now you're at about 60-75 GB for just Windows. Add in the pagefile and hibernate file, a few tens of GB for programs you've installed, plus 15% free space to keep the SSD's write speeds fast, and you're at 120 GB before you've even put any data on the drive. (I recommend enabling System Restore with a reasonable amount of space for restore files, so that's another 10 GB. Making Win 10 on a 120 GB SSD unviable.)

    3. Re: Made up "facts" by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      Runs fine with an SSD.

    4. Re:Made up "facts" by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      The 120GB size is definitely something that exists, and it's probably the result of tallying up the winsxs folder. On most Windows machines this folder can be friggin' huge, largely because it stores multiple versions of various system resources. Given that it's also a "special" folder, it's difficult to accurately tell how large it is.

      Also, I have a test computer (with a hard drive) on which I installed Win10 for evaluation. I decided not to upgrade, so I still use Win7 on my primary workstation. I had my Win10 system off for a whole month, an when I finally turned it on again, the machine thrashed the drive for a good 2 hours before the system was usable (Edge literally took 45 minutes to start). I later did a Win10 update, and that did more thrashing for over 3 hours. Yes, since SSDs came out, a LOT of software companies stopped caring about filesystem overhead.

      Also keep in mind that everyone is using a different version of Win10 as MS pushes their dog food out, expecting the public to do all their QA. I'm not the least bit surprised that your experiences are not the same as those of others. My own experience with Win10 has been horrible, which is exactly why I don't use it. Feel free to accuse me of making up nonsense, too, or insist that my backup PC is a piece of junk. I'll continue to avoid Win10.

    5. Re:Made up "facts" by Curate · · Score: 1

      The 120GB size is definitely something that exists, and it's probably the result of tallying up the winsxs folder. On most Windows machines this folder can be friggin' huge, largely because it stores multiple versions of various system resources. Given that it's also a "special" folder, it's difficult to accurately tell how large it is.

      Almost all files under C:\Windows\System32 are hardlinks to corresponding files under C:\Windows\WinSxS. So if you are calculating Windows footprint by counting both of these directories, you are overcounting by a huge margin.

  31. Personal problems by tepples · · Score: 1

    I just said that his not having SolidWorks on Linux is a personal problem. 99.999% of people don't need Solidworks (whatever that is).

    Say 99.999 percent of people don't need each particular application that is incompatible with GNU/Linux. This means 0.001 percent of people do need each such application. If there are 10,000 such applications whose user bases don't overlap much, then roughly 10 percent of people will need at least one such application. More likely than not, eventually you, a family member, a friend, or a co-worker will experience such a personal problem and expect you to help solve it.

  32. Retrain for a different industry by tepples · · Score: 1

    Or you're tied to Microsoft OS's because you need a mission critical application. [...] There's also still a lot of small business that just can't operate without Windows.

    Let's say you work in an industry that requires use of an application or operating system that spies on you all the time. An extremist might claim that such industries ought to cease to exist, and affected workers ought to retrain to work in a different industry with a different "mission". For example, bingoUV has recommended that someone become a meat butcher.

    But I sincerely doubt that this is practical for most.

    I file my taxes using TurboTax.

    And for the last two years, I filed my individual tax return using Credit Karma's web application, which is cheaper than TurboTax or H&R Block and works on Mozilla Firefox for Xubuntu. I plan to use Credit Karma again this year.

  33. Clueless trolls by sjbe · · Score: 1

    I don't serve you.

    Don't recall claiming you did but you do serve up a lot of bullshit here on slashdot. Still can't tell if you are a troll or an idiot but I'm favoring both.

    Have fun with your spyware.

    Windows 10 "spying" on me is pretty far down my list of concerns when it comes to shady companies watching my activities.

  34. MacOS hardware kills it (if only apple where open) by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    MacOS hardware kills it (if only apple where open) to more hardware and nvidia.

    apple is pissing off the pro users when are willing to Drop $5-10K on a high end workstation. HP-Z is killing it.

  35. Bloat by WCMI92 · · Score: 1

    Software bloat is the biggest problem in IT. Windows should not be anywhere near 7GB IN TOTAL not just for am update.

    640K ought to be enough for anybody?

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
  36. Windows PCs w/32 GB drives shouldn't be sold by SB5407 · · Score: 1

    They routinely run out of space due mostly to just Windows files. I see it happen often. I have to routinely use Disk Cleanup on my 120 GB machine for the same reason.

  37. Re:MacOS hardware kills it (if only apple where op by Immerman · · Score: 1

    They used to be pretty excellent - not nearly as excellent as the substantial price premium would suggest, but still really well-made hardware and a well-polished OS. If you could afford it, and didn't need any Windows-only software, then they made for an arguably great deal.

    Heck, I've got one of the last MacBooks with a DVD drive, admittedly running Linux because I'm not fond of MacOS, but it's a really nice piece of hardware nonetheless. However, the recent ever-diminishing capabilities of their new computers, combined with the user-hostile anti-upgrade policies like soldered-in RAM is unforgivable.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  38. Good. I run Windows 10. Sometimes I use Linux. by laxr5rs · · Score: 1

    Apart from the OS debates of this over that, I use Windows 10 for ease of use in the areas that I like. Like recording and using Photoshop (much preferred over the Gimp). People, at least in the Windows world don't understand often that updating an operating system is more important than the level that they are bothered by it. If this gets the updates onto the disk, and gets them on people's machines easier, good for MS.

  39. Bad idea by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    I refurbish a lot of laptops. And a trend I've noticed in the sub-laptop models, the super tiny tablet-PC combo deals, is they typically have VERY tiny internal storage. I've seen them range from 16 to 32 GB typically. Oddly, 24GB seems to be a sort of standard I've seen on many of these 'all-in-one' near-SOC based devices.

    This is not enough space for the operating system and spare space desired (7GB.) In typical contemporary fashion, instead of ensuring these older devices continue to work, break them all so people will buy new ones. Many of these devices are all-in-one near-SOC, with soldered on RAM and storage right to the mobo. You cannot upgrade these devices.

    This irresponsible use of resources simply cannot go on. We will face shortages eventually. A different mindset needs to be adopted and quickly. Having software decisions break hardware needlessly is... stupid to say the least. And irresponsible. Where are the so called millennials who care about sustainability? I've heard a lot of talk, but seen very little of the walk.

  40. Sigh, Win10... by sarren1901 · · Score: 1

    With only one more year of Windows 7 support, my wife and I are getting nervous. I can probably shift over to Linux on the desktop full time and ideally turn my current windows 7 install into a vm file. I read a howto guide on using vmware to do just that, so I'll have to try that out sometime this year. I figure I can play my older windows only games and editors in a vm setup. I already use linux as a server so I'm no stranger to linux, just never took the full time dive.

    The wife on the other hand already can't stand Win10 at work so she doesn't want it at home. She's not an Apple fan but she does use numerous windows only applications for photo editing and not running those apps is not an option.

    I'm debating about upgrading her Win7 computer to Win8 to give us another 3 years of updates. Does this sound like a good idea? Is upgrading to Win8 as a stopgap better then just going to Win10, or should I just bite the bullet?

  41. Re:Flash-drive PC's? by nctritech · · Score: 1

    I never said they gave a damn. A lot of people are stuck with Windows 10 through no fault of their own. I offered up the voodoo for those people; it doesn't excuse Microsoft being a hot mess. We don't live in an ideal world. We live in the real world, with real problems that we can't ever hope to get ideal fixes for, so we do what we can with what we have.

  42. haven't used windows since 95 by suezz · · Score: 1

    the only computer I have loaded with the windows crap is at work. Using Linux on all my other computers. So now they come up with more reasons for corporations to spend more money so they get rid of more employees.

    Good job microsoft. I haven't gave them any money since windows 95.