Slashdot Mirror


Legal Actions Against Linux-DVD authors

Teancum writes "Legal actions have already started to happen against the programmers who wrote the DVD-CSS decription routines. This page contains the official response by the programmer, who has had his web site shut down by his ISP. I guess that the DVD Forum doesn't want to see an open source project that can read DVD-Video. More info about the Livid project can be found here. " Update: 11/05 04:33 by H :Check out the latest announcement from his site - eMedia has done a great report on the whole thing - read this.

346 comments

  1. Re:Down with big business by Smallest · · Score: 1

    yeah! down with computer manufacturers (build your own, from sand, wood, and copper ore!), telephone companies (make your own wires and string them to all of your friend's houses), cable TV, movie studios (fuckin greedy theives, making movies that cost tens of millions of dollars... you can make your own for ten dollars and a CamCorder), electronic companies (oops, no CamCorders), record companies, package delivery services (won't be anything left to deliver anyway), airlines (no reason to go anywhere), hospitals, any drug company who ever invested R&D money to create the pill that might, someday, save your life.

    there is nothing wrong with "Big Business" that isn't already wrong with people in general.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
  2. Re:Interesting tidbits on Section 296 by technos · · Score: 2

    Notice where it says (In section 2A)"advertises for sale or hire or possesses in the course of a business" are the conditions for breaking the law. As he has neither offered for sale or substantially benifitted from the CSS decryption code, I figure he is probably safe.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  3. So THIS, silly AC by Skid · · Score: 1

    In this age of nigh-anonymous free webpage accounts, it is hardly a difficult matter to find someplace to upload it, and then to post the URL as an AC.

    A lawyer that reads Slashdot is by definition technically inclined enough to realize this. Save the paranoia for the stuff you need to be paranoid about.

    --
    These are *MY* opinions.
    They will not be *YOUR* opinions until the Orbital Mind Control Lasers are operati
  4. Re:Section 296 clauses 1,2 of the Copyright Act 19 by Scott+McGuire · · Score: 1

    First, which country is this act from and which countries laws apply in this case?

    Second, in the US wouldn't 2b violate the first amendment? And would it not violate similar laws in at least some other countries?

  5. Closing the barn door... by frankie · · Score: 1

    The Windows version of DeCSS is available in lots of places (for example, DVDtidbits), and other platforms will doubtless follow shortly. It's far Far FAR too late for the cartel to shut down one or two web sites. They really shouldn't even try, it only makes them look stupid. Well, I suppose using the CSS encryption scheme demonstrates quite enough stupidity...

  6. Re:Section 296 clauses 1,2 of the Copyright Act 19 by nstrug · · Score: 1
    I hate replying to my own posts but forgot to post my thoughts on this. IANAL but Derek may have real problems with clause 2b. The plaintiff will try to prove that he "publishes information intended to enable or assist persons to circumvent that form of copy-protection". Clause 2a shouldn't be less of a problem (the keyphrase is "specifically designed.")

    Nick

    --
    -- "It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park" - Jim Moran
  7. Re:My web page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Solicitor? Damn boy, you should be getting a lawyer not a hooker!

  8. Some confusion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make some good arguments, but there is some confusion in your logic... (don't worry, this isn't a flame :o)

    Most likely, the DVD Forum (previously the DVD consortium) has a patent or copyright on the way that DVD's utilize this system.

    OK - they may have a patent, but since the site has been shut down due to "copyright infringement", such a patent would have nothing to do with this. Patents and copyright cover different things; they could patent the method (algorithm) but could only copyright code (program/subroutine).

    It could be that the only way a Linux DVD player could exist would be to write code that works with this patented system. You can either license it, or steal it. This may lead the Forum to believe that there is only one way to write code to work with their system, so it MUST be a copyright violation.

    Not if it's patented; that would be patent infringement. In order for it to be copyright infringement, they would have to have posted someone else's code. (Which they didn't.)

    So they may be guilty of patent infringement, but not of copyright infringement.

    1. Re:Some confusion... by |DaBuzz| · · Score: 2

      OK - they may have a patent, but since the site has been shut down due to "copyright infringement", such a patent would have nothing
      to do with this


      Actually, Derek wrote the following on the Livid-dev mailing list:

      Still haven't got full details, but it "potentially violates the Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 1988; Sectiond 296(1) and (2)".

      They seem to be using a statute that covers both copyrights and patents so they could be claiming either, or both. This is why I used the terms in the way that I did.

  9. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 2
    To repeat: this is not an "openness" issue. Peer review wouldn't have resulted in better functionality.

    Of course it would have. Someone would have said, "That won't work. You see, once someone gets a single key, which they will be able to do if they disassemble or just pay attention to what a software decoder does, the whole thing goes ka-blooey."

    -=-=-=-=-

    --

    -=-=-=-=-
    My mom's going to kick you in the face!

  10. Re: 24-inch academy ratio ? by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

    Hey, I could be wrong, but I though that was academy ratio. Academy ratio motion pictures (pre-widescreen) were in an aspect ratio similar if not identical 4:3 and this called the academy ratio. Perhaps academy ratio is slightly different. The only reason I was willing to call it that was that I have never seen vertical or horizontal letterboxing when they show academy ratio movies on TV. So, if the academy ratio is NOT 4:3, then it is close enough that there is no signifcant cropping. They certainly dont pan-and-scan them!

  11. Emailing by nowindowz · · Score: 1

    Right now it seems to me as we might be overreacting, but I doubt it will stay that way for long If this comes to be the case lets email them. One thing to remeber keep the language clean and be polite, because the minute one of use is rude and pisses them off they will ignore us and all is lost. Another thing to remeber is that capitalism is democratic, buying a product is vote and everyone listend to their pocketbook.

    --
    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  12. this is a bunch of crap. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    i'll say that again. this is a bunch of crap. is the css stuff gonna need hosting that's not gonna cut them off at the faintest smell of legal action? jwhitema@netscape.net

  13. Re:Once Again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhm. The CSS encryption was reverse engineered in Norway. Reverse engineering is specifically protected by Norwegian copyright law. They DID play by the rules.

  14. Re:We need collective memory by Pierce · · Score: 1

    I've wondered quite often when such a site would come online, some way to keep track of which companies to boycott (with the reasons for them being in the database). ...have a way for people to "sign" the petitions and hopefully follow-through and not purchase any.

    Wayne

  15. Re:Questions: by aqua · · Score: 2
    Presumably by now the CVS archive has been checked out thousands of times today -- openprojects had a fairly nice CVS server, IIRC, and the code is small. Presumably whoever moved against the authors was trying to stop dissemination, but the code escaped -- like the Australian rabbit retention fence, there were already rabbits on both sides of the fence, and an attack by the movie industry just makes it spread faster.

    There is little to fear -- the fact that the industry went after the authors already suggests that they're archeologically ignorant of how an information network functions. Before they made their stupid attack, there were perhaps a hundred copies of the source. Now there are thousands, spreading all over with an O(n^2) growth surface area, and they'll never be able to catch them all (my copies are in two secured machines far enough apart that a strategic nuclear warhead couldn't get them both, and no paper trail -- some friendly overseas mirrors would help, though).

    If it does come to a court case against the linux-dvd authors, though, it would be great to see organized OSS community resistance -- legal defense funds, PR/letter efforts, source-code T-shirts and such stuff. As the OSS community grows in scope, it will naturally tend to come in contact with more legal pigheadedness, and it would be useful to have some sort of organized defenses (conventional and guerilla types) to cope with an attack.

  16. Can you copyright a number? by taniwha · · Score: 1
    (please bear with my probably ignorance of trade secret case law and feel free to jump in and correct me)

    it just dawned on me - what we're really talking about here is the key that was found in the Xing code, plus some others that were guessed once it was known.

    It's pretty obvious that the guessed ones can't be copyrighted .... being encrypted they haven't even been published so they must be trade secrets .... the only people who could be prosecuted would be people who gave them away ... and no one did, as I understand it, they were obtained by deduction, not reverse engineering or any sort of theft.

    On the other hand the original key that was in plaintext in the Xing code was obtained from a copyrighted work ..... can something that's just a number be copyrighted? (I know it can't be trademarked)? Can I copyright '9', or better yet '0'? how about '42'? or '78687622'? can one draw the line (yeah I know it's law, not math and they have different criteria for getting stuff done .... but if some people are going to own numbers I want to stake out some usefull ones before the land rush gets going).

    Seriously though it seems that one could 'own' a number in a certain context .... for example '987492837498234898732' in the context of DVD might be a copyrightable number .... but what if I want to use it in a paper on number theory? or it's a large prime I want to use in a paper on primes?

    Of course the problem here is that in order for this DVD-number to be usefull it has to be secret but copyright requires publishing - the minute it's published the number loses all it's worth - so maybe we're just looking at lawyer smoke&mirrors

    1. Re:Can you copyright a number? by Chip+Stillmore · · Score: 1

      Well, they did reverse-engineer the Xing player in order to get the unencrypted key. The first key was not obtained by deduction, the remaining ones were. I'm no lawyer, but I suspect that it's the first act they did of reverse-engineering the player, that is the source of what's going on now.


      Of course, I could be (and probably am) wrong.

  17. Re: 24-inch academy ratio ? by evilpenguin · · Score: 2

    Oh, and the 24-inch referred to my screen diagonal measurement. It wasn't meant to be part of the aspect ratio comment...

  18. Re:Bully Tactics by Paul+Dirac · · Score: 1

    Is it ever possible for the legal system of a country to be used by a "monolithic" organization for a legitimate beef? Aren't lawsuits sometimes the right way to proceed? Attacking the legal system, using the whole "information wants to be free" schtick, makes us look like a bunch of cyberhooligans. Maybe if we want to impart real change, maybe we have to join the "establishment", and fight from within. Dirac out.

  19. Re:To The Ramparts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bruce,

    It's quite simple to see what they've done wrong. All of you mad speculators are assuming that it's the DVD consortium claiming copyright infringement. There is another possibility. Perhaps it's Xing trying to cover their asses so they won't be out the ~$1 million (US) fine that they're going to owe the DVD consortium by the time all this gets settled.

  20. Here's the source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's uuencoded in a reply to this message.

  21. Re:THIS IS GREAT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have got to be the most ignorant, selfish, ms lover, money hog in the world that I have ever had the displeasure to know about. Sorry if the linux community is smarter than you and that they are willing to write software for free on their spare time. You and all the other MS lovers are so concerned about money and being rich. I decide to make a simple calculator for my personal usuage so I might as well distribute it as opensource. However, with you, "OH NO, I better get as much money out of this small program as possible. I wouldn't want to help someone out for free now would I?" Opensource is good for people learning too. I can think of many times where I was not able to figure out how to do something and was able to find out with someones source. Little things like figuring out how to drag a window from anywhere with a mouse click. I suppose you would no nothing about that though because you don't know a damn thing about programming do you? You just pay programmers shitty money so that you can make millions off of their work. You are the one stealing. The linux community gives to people while you steal people's money and lives. You are the fucking pig. You sound like a typical business pig. GET A LIFE DIPSHIT and go back to college and learn something.

  22. Re:I'm not sure I understand by Thother · · Score: 1
    Wait,

    This has nothing to do with the entertainment industry angry about a bad investment. Entertainment companies are famous for making bad investments. Just ask any investor.

    The DVD pricing scheme has marketting 101 written all over it. Always charge MORE for something new. It doesn't matter if the "New and Improved" version is any better than the old one, consumers will pay more just because it's something different. Other industries thrive on this concept. Car manufacturers stay in existance because of this rule. So do computer manufacturers. Entertainment people are just following the pack here.

  23. Re:Get DVD CSS Code here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You need the DVD ioctl; dvd_authinfo isn't defined by the CSS code. You can get the ioctl at:

    www.kernel.dk

    It's the CSS code that's important. The ioctl doesn't threaten anyone.

  24. Moderate down this troll by Barbarian · · Score: 1

    You know, it's probably horde in Finnish or whatever the programmer's language is.

    1. Re:Moderate down this troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nah, he should be moderated up for being informative.

      There is no excuse for having stupid errors in your .sig. You write it once and then you forget it for days or weeks. Correcting it is no effort at all, and it makes it much easier on the hundreds or thousands of people who have to >read< what you write. If you won't make any effort to make your .sig easy to parse you are forcing a lot of extra effort onto the rest of the world, especially those whose native language is not English.

  25. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Smallest · · Score: 1

    I really do not see what all the fuss is about in the first place. If the DVD consortium had bothered to create open source drivers for LINUX and *BSD then the crack would not have been necessary.

    uh, yeah, right.
    do you really think that's all there was to it? you don't think there's any chance maybe the people who did this (or the people who would do this) weren't thinking "This is gonna be cool! Free Movies!" ?

    get real

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
  26. This is the reply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And here it is:
    begin 644 csc-auth.tar.gz
    M'XL("*,T(S@``V-SE4B%I.+H$22&)-8@P,4`DOGOS]?=,\" `%V?/JCWUU\>/]>_Z"U?G_Q,__6'][);_FYP`G
    MX>C37W'&Y_D0X^C1[UI\%H,.G?Z8?'J[OAMY4%C%7_'A2[S 3NZ(N
    MU1*"2XH-/;%K7@_BF00P5_6TOMJ![KPJ8POZ*IS%ZC.Y*>- ,/]1S'*WN'",@
    M-\TKDR=RU*J.RQA_&SY*?^\H>J8\S:]?8\F&Z+0UEM&A#3L X@M8RHQ`+:+2Z
    MMK"6'DDBM:I+FO:DQ=MM!N'3X2P?UH'IVHUJ[>9'&T@P9V[ B?*9LIURQ*2CV)YC!,X[6Z9*VUB^I79]'S5'@96'29]JD
    M+A>T=0+-E"RPE8&O5W,"GJU,HM*7(=CGF6MY":096E(4@NR (BO;
    M0QCS-%$P5@I/)$R3LZN[0V0G(IQ,VGZ51P5II23'+9E!6=5 3,WFG;+HKC%`_,M
    MIB@=^15'M[/U8JUC+W+(:FW([13^JE+FF&.&7AILQ.5&H8> SY$Z5Y1G879"9V%$($CB%QOWF#H1(Q36=:/SJX05$>'Y/QV!;
    MTG_CN9R?"G`H49/V)$#35M^.)=B56I&^&T]ED>/5(CWCA_? AF>#N\[M,'1/Q%CY'3
    M,:CDS)&%#0X$Q[P4Y5P7T;""X2#%F:"=CBAJLG5`6OJK/,# T;N@[)&.22*'V'@WQ%&$@6(3OJ("
    ML%[D!+>7?"#IEG,`A]&TXHRH#PQ-^9//$`;-EJ!7SE4)(A8 1-S?`YQRXP.[?*5@]5G/;_&A#'$/J
    M#8T9P_9(`O4`&)P/H1YT^)?1:+9IHNZJ&TFIR/F*3+3DZ$@ R8
    M8(S@B`Q7J=;37.1Q3"RR.-U`*B#:9_Z/^JLQ6W()L@"'[I2 \9GW&(OQ#Y7$G
    M$DKE1\S''4X!J%VO;-PCLS9M3BS+]?D)`%X.[=+['!BL741 AGANX%&`ORCI
    M?O.5N0?-;#EO6LMQ^(YW%*[*XP;C(Z:+;$HB4G!PU)\Q["Z 65`1U$!5B1.Q.B4D*WIXI1;$WIF72[$(&=`H)^-0O["_./71O1 .\3
    M?0Z[8EP)5)M(;X:K`VI/E3&E(D%``E,FBQISPO:D07:@*Z) ,Q.
    MT8EX^FC$BWD#]\'IVN>,,"WJE\@CL,8^G!+]])F
    M=?$.^P[CTJC),I^_:#O-Q6ZAGU/SLA9O`]#&6U"NXY3>6(( (7[H$>4?DD02Q3@3RW!PBA'_5:2DM&-EQ;[/>.9"[
    M[YOPVHTT%;@GY[))8Z]\9NL>7(RJE+``GL&\#&3]3'5:1)X 0^*)HE
    MQ,,N&E$?BWO5+9\%4EM#/KO27D#B?D=L]XZFIG-=-2^H/:. S\2:0"M[FT,,U
    MIH08*4U2VTDJ:C^IDVM(=XT%FS=E"VB'X@(M/8:LTJ[A,D` Q8_WA)OU":EN;8#"]&P34!
    M4-,>D/4PLB."CLHH(H2ASF5%JGLGXNLIJ;^$E6OK8H2A96+
    MZ2U_@GW;*#0O??P+J).PR39-5Z2:7BC&46=`E$(!M0RR_]H VAMDE(24?0V$>(,&H0V2%G-/#+DC_1QGJ6P'
    MF66(SA7WWX2OG8E+OJAIRPH&2!P0=I$#Y`Y!Y72=)0WH7"[ T&!BY&RY?(5#V
    M,Z7'VDYPH;U&G(5%]KS#OL2#'+VOG(X>&/A)`O[W='!:_L+ )_T$'BU/6E>8D
    M`HD40Z@3+!-&X>Y9G(&67.*9@S'NVE;:`TMN'^:$1"E2
    MHFP[:'?X-@(E/7J_H2_$6G_NO,QO`U#CQNJH+(=:I]%JISG +K
    M)0Z7Z59NE"EA*Y^_B+C4]F9,6YCFYBCE8'OL/)0;S5WI(8' /_YBB.E_>A=4FF>2VVJO!;$I-27\YS:;CQBTXV#;L$RAF$Z0O@ )Q5`_J++[=Q\R>T,5;^RKLI(OZ=;I/*VD59_%+\WMO2L4#_F1
    M?9!\/W,-QI--]G-I[M"%XZ*Q&CD_=DW=CHXK!K!T
    M34T=1S]F]+^YV!.*&_+5GA#W2APWZO!S3^Y1JG1C'$#Y'M3 _$XZKY"94!"6ALL7_+TA/
    MK0>Z*Z4@'#,?>Q79AYX>+B6Q_/Z!^C3Z3V^9-ZF8+W7TUW+ 4V]CQ2@14R&&8YLB&0[9RY^1=B
    M2J@"\F-$@G+9']Q&ZG.?IVG4#VY2.:3?'+'G(Y%=VZ3&T^_ *
    MR(6;?Z+7PYY^X="XI:D=F)=--W4&-S5R6207&,@A*X^TVTS -%G0F0DQE1718[E`F[USQ2$#AW
    M@!/\*0A^`GL+'L,IF@LV=\62("TL:$2#V_;-7R@C&56`#V& 1(P\7%F[DDXP!
    M5'GQSB$D`L_2B`KS'"^;4S"D&_62DE;3#F(E?X=\P7#!IN2 (]B1GALT4[O\S'^)UP?3)[8=JZ!&
    M/TQUY[IGW*[S@WJN5R>-@[3:N=L@Q=UL6?FQ>_@Z=A4-HOH I*7)10(+LD_!D*8]::;MFFR$PR.F]TRQH
    M:/7TM(V5H
    M^7;--^@=%H.A%^0UN8M3$H@;5B(9S8RK[JN=KP-(.R=G$+! !*:!:04CHJ*T[
    MP"24$G.YG*+O?D3=6`R07\"#Z8K$
    MA#DYBDZ2\M,7I7E.^?965$Y#S[#S
    MD&$BPZ;N2G;^5!?&W,W9\G5^M[:
    M@T)"0F4P4.H-CU.S;'O9,CH
    MTD7/@TP`"&GEG%>O-\V`?@C_PV?SO=F9*=B
    M4S0U.WWS1V8;$@08ET::5U823[)=^U6GT5A_Z4\F_='LB?5 _V=-7@^O^XW2@
    M9Y\'^F$R_C3IW^OAU$_%WNC;R6"@Q[?Z^G-_\FD0T;K)@%: $>]&,;+`!5HWY
    M[\$?L\%HIA\&D_OA;(;=KIYT_^$!F_>O[@;ZKO\%TAS\&(_ UE,IP-1Y]X0QK$G0P_?9[IS^.[F\&$IW5_PNG\HG[H3V;#
    MP52!CM^'-UVF7O6G(/N5_C*QM,!]6](A-@$`I\,I__0_:ER
    M@OWML=]L!.EBC_O^Z)H5M:=(8ESX>]0
    M+U;BF.GC_SIC`=W=Z='@&O3V)T]Z.IC\/KPF.:C)X*$_A/A I1GHRH5W&
    M(XDM;WJD/%C)X'>R@M`D;16F?_:DPRN`(]0R8+A)!`2$4W
    M_?O^I\$T4HT1\-%NF#S2TX?!]9#^@>CZ3J0"+_KMD;2(#]P FN@]U$FMD
    MATYEY(-D:R-O(SA[WR_/VK/W[(_LXFX\)6/#(;.^9HKQ^VI `JR>#$>3%[M2_
    MOGZ=_?/A$`722E&S-)//;7]3S%"Y-4I=X'._LCIB3
    MMAH-%(!"H:I0*!3@WXRRR,^@.B_($"GT&C8)PF5WIGI51WF >JIGEG
    M8[CP""C`F)W"D`+%SN[V0X=?=^K`NM'G1VJVBB9CK(#@B@- //G3T@IL..-TH
    M&"4-=FA(NBN67L,(B/R4SH3I:`">(4_`:S%X]57
    M5P8^`(C,A\KSA+5B51H3_#$*'BNWE3SS6V&`4LS[2)>6M>? -U0@(-V)U$78J/CUSQ;)5N@T:K:`6)32!KEW$-+'&:BD
    MX(X77;.,PU#A#*^LLF;:=3&KAU3MW2AR7B+7`U;GB&`3T^- R1U:SAM)O4H!1
    M?O&,?_F33_,7"G(D$0:"T$-$C&CDOW`LX"%+T94SF0SP-:% 1_P_:&
    M9[1ZYIPU*MTS"PD]/KJW?_SBF5$\GOTY5)IW0!)*#='\
    MRM#W?^+@ZH-CB\@[?MGUH@RNMY&L/W>8.EN26D-/7LQP*Z* ;H3X^K!K/!,#
    MYY78-F2[#9O!9HD&XT)P[FEET_08$XWTF/[=K'`^-B`W>J8 %[V'3.,]&%P9A
    MV?EL8T/8.-;1LXLA-W7=G$1&%IDHXRM3K&@/O3M/9"U]GDU +
    M$8]Q3PLS6;V?6,W3>+N=/WZS[0RI6^1@."B,Y)3_C86:1.* N(#,RLY>YJI[-^E-='W:>]]-@4'?$PO$CGW
    M;:CD]969:>/1DW(4&T5M.CQ#6!+16/BA+,$Z9D-[O.LG0T% JU+V&ZSH3BVX:
    M>?.&T$\XOC!L%()#L"[>@-MAFX:L*)7]V>E8MJ>%V2"JA+/ /%*QK.`YG"M>G
    MJ,+.(UMBM`PX=H4U!D;UF7-)*2AP:S\B4_A@/43MB>Z^T>; LX9D5@2X*JP-=
    M+-LU_Z?#VMS_[OCS\9]^.OZ]8H!]0ORO>E*]C__U)7ZY\7\ U'L]_ASINCO]E
    M?HV&'?^X7DW$ZE.K5>[C?WV)W_9$;,K9=#L=C4=7HM7\H7, A^VSB0^Q#U[_S_SR\__;#*>#>?CZ=5GK>/6^1_'"_._VF@D
    M]_/_2_SL^-]/Z7_-7V[^'](7XG/7M&;1TDC2N+MN+I=K4L\ S_;65F'K![,Z%PNZR5S=.IH.F;%M]+7M
    M.-ZN-5S&5X=[!S\R9KLO6GK$^(S2BN
    M;]=-[?7EK*=W:JED-TM@`&[?VH9^-NM-$;T3!>*%EM3:IGO 7%3B]M4#_LB]&
    M3("NW=@6V>"?WR'??#8W0)&Q>E/&@]NYNIO_=FQ_!QJ[9?[ 'U0K6?V;Z5YJU
    M"O1_\^?]_/\2O],LE4!]T6[D9UB!]'4R[OZ7?%!J&_L%5O: RT1ID"D4\:6*FB+MJ-_*P9M*YE7;7^IL/:NUUO\
    MO#&._NT/A8)"D=*V1:7%9IQ:`#Z'EK9=D^*Y;J^J?B&#;[7 U'_PMD-+O4L)ZZ,(?IR6X;;@@5#AQRUT('#?'?MMLAEU,.9&B+ OURLF'>FH]
    M0\[&O?>R`Y?U&(N4.T,'/QU@%TE]8'C]'[
    M3$^4#.>&!YHW:7MWH>VR;6M/2>1.BTL'^EEO>D4_W_3LW7@ ZG)^>ES6V!1T'
    M/M!5YD,Z[YU*FQ]('=BM=J$:94]UA@U5V?ARKJWB/C)-IQ/ S73;*N.U.$N=VZE)>"^H13@J(A[QD8$FQ#3DMB'EV]8D
    M%1DS%J&RUZU&Q\?3*[D:O2\D-4W(=S2J>R[D$@KSD7C4\CT HWMSG:0CE^D8/A
    MXY/Y;.MR/CNIQ"?QYN6XNXSM7+_T.-;(SRLWH@@C8;UZ>N* E/8H,0'3/D)=2
    M"#9'5W=:0Y"@X[[?@.\[?C`.IH6O6VF,L7@U2C6_*O,0,I4 PLZ/TW+GE6\@^
    M^!^28DDS+3[)T1^?WAV"1%DG;Y)]5:O=%LO95!/1&,+9**L D8]KBG'F.R7;
    MV.,12'`LO@'VNW7P.AN/WTNL#:TJ]K1&>&-US&>7N"-N/JN )A#=>0!1^8:*]3->V0
    M2T;HU_-T;N,>:-R1D`^[\6$)3Z2&GL[&&"W;+'&C?!5BKAC G,5$*>V5I=
    MZ`(;]>^/VIE"T3JEP8=&G!]9I`0_3]N4^:DZSIGU3NI0?)8 -A&6(FP-/Y!\>
    M0P_)).B#5QG@)\&3?X)QS&:$'#SY
    MNPF4$$/T>Z/^-/L0_22G+.>G%I89EG_/#&GO?>R.)6PZLF? JB7@G;F9LN6F#B>>6;\1I.ORF9/@A=-!RG
    M;]&E65VZY(H!T5Z[9WK5!YBFA83SX\*&9I:_R7%QC4^:3@W 5;X)>#5^A^G6&
    M0&1&%4>-/0U.:GZ((7EN*$VJ/];K$.#L\T`8T0_I?#K\^,! @VJ!6%5&$1+;0+V4R#!(E$]IP]3E"]8"#P*O(`KO``6FG
    MP9-G"1R)K*>>2J&F0Z,HS/2(V\'1\@!(VLS_5./[]?^7^&T ]+$0/EQR3
    MV^WHP/"\]]%1^J%GU(+'$I_V_1]F$_%&W#03[(DI)04IH1` 7CI='8`FYXOC`
    M3XMN_M^]?%86"&ZE`3726CASOL2H:JM0V-(J$IH;(32+_HL A,[,1`0NG
    M-B"F-&WP@B,7>2$SN$?#)*PA#D8_..=A8'WW$8A/H]?I
    M>9O,B*/A_"KLMO>GY2'1B\$`:!L&:_+NT/ME6W1+>8D=?"Y *6?3@,IU*B*`'
    M>G?9>/HN'>$,>Y'1[+".,OS7"(I2.2(')L:Z5W,?N#Z`V). I:@8O6X*Y.&I(
    MMG=EZ$2KUA@YHGJ*":36F8S"]
    M10]Y!*1D0`&&HX#KP3A27`0E!K+"WPIKVB:4$9?M$U?BS=M H-_I;7*Z6*^5F
    MN5Z.DG*[W"C7RJU?30/64$+V1HQ6^R:NO-TIK$DKAO)-F&- Q:(JW=Z)A]&0W
    MJNQ$&QO#4F%MS988"G1?UT+5P[=O!8XBR?5,"Y=AWMLI_"H LU]M%ICT
    MA@*UG#MAB$IL(N)F()Z+&?R%7RW:>!)]55WQI2I?HII\L8" D-K/`2O"E$N5K
    MD8\KP,3(G*SX4D'5,6@L-\C)[SC(C7)LQK9:;I6CNAGKFAG Q!(.\5%#K9S$S
    MG$;M3=:T#)6*4B%$B1HD8)6*4B%$BKG]IG9T_,IHET6CP_; M]110OU0>0R2JKBR:5TDU
    M3P8`F6=Z?R6M`J("S;*+_GAC:E0G`TF(U+B="`W8C.LA%U7 `F#]%-
    M\I2']\9G5Z/QN:P*QH-M*?SQY[@:/3+_U/9QQ`-SKYV,!X= GRT`%Z(
    M.`!?G$QE]\#HA:755=67P#^5E?IQ>)Z>;1CJ'([[2FJ**LG Y?#S/W/;IG"'2W#5N]I@_$.DLU1(F878Z
    M'&CD,@.D.U2K.POCL"B_R[GL[I#;@;S!*H+9:SQPEC\VR5) B&";/4(G0JEQ3
    M.46P3M%*W:(S5"HM29X(M14QZ55GE/6R%58,UVTB]#+].S" 1;`>;?PU
    MFXXMCC[H9=.:5:\)X4X!8'!9B)V+#UFNEA3X@FE_OBEYMPI KZ)?A8L79QI/N
    MF\K;Z/%C0Z>EZ!=-B9'21@)3DK?1M]'?31;)*>DMEQF?FH: -`6SLP%8]$!$$
    M%?,OTFM@D(\>$?&;+_LLA'NBS17Q_W7PIIY/MS84,:S2R)8 ^U4D
    MAUEF9JL3*U*
    MJC-[#7/;P=0'/">;V=M=#)(AVS64(-R"2W5U+"N62BVP^,; JDR
    M,]11_9*^:!3,J!J70AGH3%KV\J_S=#2&=K5S.,/-&+S]`\+ DRC=#V)P6
    M=6?DH5U$JEUP:S90AL;3V>:2>/A';`XB'Y@7X0N,DE?&;6` ?H4T
    M]NK=C5#O4,IKC'9!-1][BYD5&4XQKD,A5M58]&+TR,ZC'G] V!B1,
    MI%YB_;%U81(DI%=
    MO.A8:1I':/BVI'+64*U)Y0"X\JMGG0[^WL??>\A3+4L!6KB .
    M#N59C;W-JP[KVB$*$V@M08%&U1OBCI`I(;RV+W9TA#S[*-# 5AWCV49C
    M:JAA[X"VLU]W5FO4TCT#G!U"U1UTL8.4I+58SNK6>;0L-;' ).J;UZ'3:KL:8=?
    MZ&^C`%^2CA_:?"ENN-YP#[L[?EVLZ/M`S\EX@#I!R3/
    M:M.CDBTF;>^3-#@RJ'^O@P)L]SYAD_Z8`MBD]J2E/90"=;2 X@0;H["$YH+8&
    MB8(@V"1B@TTB\=%:W4`-.JP`T=8F(>LA*FWO^69T4$,KF/O [,0IP1#EP!\'QQ)V#1NP_>_K]`):Z[Y)51)%Q\\-SA-R*M-(=+ KN\:-TW_&9]JJ^V`%)@[PH)G-&
    M)K*"0XY]USONDSDX?
    M>&I-R(423R!*1>3P2AJD1U).TT\@TA4;0\IM=E:*CMB+#LZ >6M/3_"$'?E]Q
    MX/XV$[;@=I](%^2E'-,Z20[5DE?4E$^W//VU*6H#8`W(;)$ @B,##0-;LHP^"M*FGX8)!JX3\(H*9V\#Z&NU=?9$5LTB
    M+8;DUV23.)4INPZ:?DS(=DGS#;MMZ1D*)XS.7G+K/9_.6Q) $A43:)I7:@1.UU/&9(H>1TI#Y#
    MULVJ.6D"%D.ZBDFMI$>G-T26$7,^A!*GW0I$./&34%>)/4E 744S5SDH@_LA.
    M2'"%NM2IQ1X'^2*6,RF>MX[&D$VM?OX*6`JV+_:&$)W*I6S 0[VC#,Z8:G
    M&0H^';C8DR!GI18@C%:@O9"8R8LX2L12HQ:H4A07;#?U[A9 UE8X?1%5TB%`.
    M'T?TD,^`>7(H]^H!EHX"4B-#H(I.TE!EJ!GHCQ1_%(4D;(5 =\R@YJJT4'!PEFW*@*CD^=5LJ'W2B:'K"
    M(\N,J7"TN4`@9O@!F3KD/0>>I@Z5"/!"9D6I175?)T_'#UW "RW@C$6ZZF`Z*B@_#(Q5@;585@;NEJ)`X6U50]J$,WR5P"Z4Q6 %E-T=*@%
    MDLC((,E$.-U):40TF2)UGTZPBJ&FQ74`E1'.[7VU9K#UEHM %EJ.2?27D=*1?
    MDK?:15#I'BT&5+I1@**+?D8U#ARY)==ZE)I41BBI*W:1)T) !
    MQ8E/!%"FLH!*,)(=E0$V@#H,3.*CX*/E1;5TDB!7(]3QR,O 9::[[]D*S
    M#>4_923%'W%%MGL$5')=TPZ43RZ'VB03ZNT'@8I/24EM2!? !1"[E!+&D*FUH
    M&`!FJ#YQ:J(.*$L#HP>-16S*T5'U8L.3@Q.0[)@,A&R1K+@ #NJHD\>17HX"LQ'I
    MG"TGB9#3*EURI1NJVUJ`*_T#/VVJ.MVIL1]X6JP$"IFN1I) @,A(39*P0];*33'?T0D2E2%I.O
    M44OGA%'UCTQ1.3YGSY'_S'E&24UVW&0-'""=JX'RJB*EZ>= 9A05T>AP$60-M
    MCDTB(VZ3BU:"A16'B?R!2A.%-ZE3-44R=@H0-2\G2"%33H, 5I;D_JK;
    M!@*$=)!HDQ+?&'(Z3GIJ7:0`UJ_D33E"LP%Q%+!^PT29K-( `E4K%H365G#X=M7>VS+8Z9E-QXB
    MJ]*RD90*.M+43*C\J70D`@*CI/8D1]Y4.`_]O"-S($J4Y>P 'HH.S3"4_!^[0
    M=YUB]DCM+82:^+:J$G[@IQ%996J5NWU6*+0H(Y%+*DV
    M=N#I2M40=66^VQ-]J/H^$!L#)&ZH]4!#EPX7:#&C>XVJ`$
    MZ`1^T?5@C-F3ENSS_$\?:KS_W?FW(DC1/S72K-Q
    M?_[W2_R6#M3U3M,I]%;Q1PQ\S-1!;:W[IOYVIR`Z;O9QGDU 'T6S$MJG
    M'LI:`>T?.@7S?YBC+8=O_/QUW#S_X[A9KRS&_VO&]_%?O\B /SL5N\-6SU\B(V90M=5.:,71.>1R]U[U7[6\Y$#WHK]X*=5-I+ R`,VL'`R2[&4CI`H`B`-"W+"LQ`$X
    MNZ^`7+.0*[(5\S(K
    MN\^)^YRXSXG_7'6)59M8=8!,5TSB\Q^?/0N0F=>/)&##B>8 \I_LD885GV;OAY.)_500A:3LB*8GXCSYZI*,$7]%!5/Q*^ZMEL $BW#YFMW;2DI\D&
    M1G;-BNO/QW,&O/(1K?XR6A476S`.7PR=?+4K[8^#1#DG:-* Z/47TM=C[#0TE=42[-K7U5AIK_J]:
    MO!5][8+10064(IQ=FZ$#A:F'H5HKH%7-$Q?#C[:
    M[QM17)(Q$:[ZP\O#[Z(]1&_C,-P$/P?5(*NO0"3.9`C#DE> OJMW`!$*,.(D*
    M(PQ`N&'AAT(T>0PDUPEAN.P)H0UDI#Q?.9B=>[[)SV'-RSL 80EN"N-;#D1+ZB!T]1
    MKV.4&/'9Q,U$RW@B(C
    M1L2'#\-Y[[18[)EO7$H4!4IZ68[6T_GVR\GE^79%6[YNIX> L/*,'Z0,AY34G
    MRSG7S(0=("(3SZUQSK+`2Q8()37+=(U@>[_C\DW"?!`5*[/ -FV4[E!3
    M_,`0$_Y*W%]5]U#?=9?:0/`J_95=KJV5;^^"M6O/%S$$LS#
    ME7#'PM"6*PF^:(=2.3T43').3=.1)X84>T)L^5'!*=S>Y*I (Y)0UQ#0JEB_I
    MW'W!ORO2UVU+EW!J[,K5L.D2.SKBJ`M:5BF"?AX\'DZF98X ,BP\WHL
    MH;:_.;LHNP4@\8F;;9EBKL!H[Q&HD17"9Q,.U,"AL=#R7@/ +#
    M$:MA-;M7AM\QE.J*N&K\25D-,J"7QD@0
    MA'@SBHZ&H^'L5..[\%S^D/P2VXL(93:^:7^/N$,;>5V-
    MX$(#(3``KX(:!L:H=-3?PC>&'9#>NDM?7,M#]S?3*`,X?I/ 4&V]W"W]3AP5X
    M09B_NF5X*,!3%:X'YB]):TI:-9._Y%&5UT0^-.0UD4=#TII =."CTI6`;)D?)
    M5)%/-7FMR*,F:6U)ZTO!MCSZ\EJ1#S5YK'/9_YRAI>:O%;D 49,T=1>K]@4#\JB*#3D1:VM#7A-Y-"2M*6E5L7TWY5&5
    MUT0^-.051O&&I#7IK-*7@FUY]"53!59E>:W(HR9I;4GK2\% VSYIX*_*A)J\5
    M>=0DK4V(=>E6W)AYZ\MN31DS1U*H>]
    MNPVCLB"[(BBNR6M%'C5):TM:7P:@+8^^O%;D0TU>*_*H25I [8$\XP6'+_"4$
    MT1(RZ,EK2QX]28LEK2Y$$LNC+J\M^="3UY8\>I(6DWJZ4G` @CZYD2N53)J^I
    M/#))&TA:5PH.Y-&5UU0^9/*:RB.3M`$A5J5S36>N3Z3YV#Y (L)$@:4U)JTKG
    MFO*HRFLB'QKRFLBC(6E-]KHK`S"01U>0G0J*,WE-L3``6SS 8Q\"6BKRF\LBP#5&W!^S@
    M-`?_?C@^P0QC!L!#4IA*R4&^3!?V#
    MS57&AUF-
    M*1N#'69V]..>]:)49@,.#T)-'#)!P6#XX%9@1:!6,'>,!E` -KF^(5QW7=":`
    MD8'K@Q8JD:4U_/@S3!+B!=(4(@'R!V
    MP3TP14#_$+'@/"HDE,M`>#>#20"."P',NJT"`=)5F3(D(#5 $,.0(A`7X,L0M^`V8">=PBA8/%8K:"28"C
    M8"J"6X.Y@1-B&H,S@_V`MX"-8P:#;79)/:EC-N#PF/"I8Y+ @!&#XX%9@19CU
    M8.[@LF"AX/HI*1SJ"R07U`7H`A!ST%P@GB%[(=*@]4!)@$8 !E0;2$4*Y3^J!
    ML(4DA2"#;@*F#(X+108RK.``2P>_!KN$!(0H@IR!N`2G!", 'UX=H!)>%`(*T
    M`@O-JC>PT/A-/4YR+!0\"DP`LPQD##K!0*"G=\MW#_$>XCW $>XCW$.\AWD.\
    MAW@/\?\P1*B86^($#3NRWLK9Y]U0+NJM6(!Q&[)HH;EXP39 0KS-$+Z[LL?C!
    MFA-J.5;-6%A@/0>5%ZMT++:P?L0R`"M@+&2P-AM4[)E/72% AH=MS5@RL/K"(
    MS)SU#2LR+%JQ]H`9I.ML(0.N>V!IH,LI5@@UBS,LB+`.A:H .JP$6?UC/8EF"
    ME3L68%A3#C2D@3/_8.'=Y`S\XZLR[,!#UG58,!!TOP
    MS%F#LNLXV-TCM>5]=RL*"@$46;"583F(5CX4.[#!83L-"@( 4>
    M;"$@2JS2!SQ76G'F2)@M>LY:CC4G3`>9LV)BS0VS!%:7,)A TG.&$0FV`)@WU$Q8MGKE]$5AV8*R"S0%F
    MN:ZS4@]H*X"%$488V-)@;H"5#X80V+.PY(=J^&(SG^A0L9? PW/]BQ56$O_GAFBLD-/T]/,5]U'8+3X)LGXO'M%Y\L6,_
    MG0[Y*7YKL_-""9-4"^_@,._!Y1GRFO!S21Q=X4N(M&_=K1N `$THH)'XKH_#V
    M\6.YI^*7_'?>.?'D2:O$3`#?$'>/Z+JLYK,%V!)XJ_*8FI@ 'W@W^F@C!@8OX
    M6Y&KE1Y+(/E'CX;TQE#,KJWMYBSH%FT2>3WN>_/XV6X5,^W MS_)O58:$?YA,
    MU7RFJF9*;*9$,B7Y3(EFBFVF6#+%^4RQ9JK83!7)5,EGJF@ F7CCSOZSE_E:P
    M9>:I_'&&JP&4/_KK3?6D3D;?.L\[H[GYX[4R.
    M-QW[KCBQM_,AEURT
    M;F1'.9J85M@31Y0C>@Z(S'(G0D'ADQ/`=?SR/#L73T8M7\8 0R3D15K3QA+T7
    MCT',Y%!.NC(N,]XJ9!T*6%I(J"MA\+.#I&7%'T_*GT\6,]3 5F]">I%GPIOMQ
    M)J+>T$WT31]NW\-'\9(;K7?Y8[O5P7`!U/'IV5O`EQ!C)98 G684G(P@;9HJRTY+^B1U*.^6M$(O6CC');?TX02%H4U9)1N\
    MNW-F>\]>'QX4#3T7909`Q)N,;V3M*90\++TMY74J+5$IK=: K]#,=-KV4U>1:
    M*="O-*U:\CJ6)B6E!3W+I?^3ZUH&=8]V!Y?E^5
    MR]9HJ%BF6^GO08]E$CYZ)`J7BGM)$%R[*]"^5O\+O.__MS
    M1@&Z-?Y/M;'D_UV]C__S17Y?#PFB(:N*2
    MW+8J:1`VZ#H->$'@4W5:2+Q))\['_EE06Q9/A1O]92&)(#2 ZQ[\`;W3SOW_9
    M'XX&XR\?_R>J->OQ4OR?1O-^_G^)'X]/[$6CF"=IU-B@:I4 =YE#;MJ^6KS?C/;\P=3,JYXBV'U
    MPHQSB[`U6!1UQA=G?=Q&CI.2MJ/:%;42X(6&AP#3C&_A.KK 8
    MP#=XOMT*VVZ[HJ
    MNR;[B9[O6@'HM1F";3+MNP"2$B5P"FX="+/H>W0*%I+/"0Q B7YQ,3/8\F.>&
    M)M&BV9W`C%:--9MRD!F%9GZU?F])E]`3>&L1FAZ$#=AAMD7 PUJO[-G!_M.
    M=--+\^6/$13GF+8M*?_UQQL!((C.21`2PT$Z-'+,P[D=DI$ (M\%Y5OE-PS?=,X-X'I.$B9
    MG@]72YQ;0AKX#\1KU_6>W_I]?Z5RO]@&)D)IF,,L.NPX27* U=M^#)"]0;XU[6#S^FYQ/#"ZPXF)V./XCU!^&/
    MQ&%"F*C$YB`C70H:7>R4&/YC;]2?9A^BUYMF#7HV-*N>Z'& *I/GE'PRPS5$V
    M?R)%C[,L.IW/)]M;6Q\^?-B.^O/UA-AF:/XP6>?XDFEV(># M-)8Y(-)Q'
    MO704=3/Z#DJD:!-;F04J\3[``@ZX>%CP9D"MM5_DF+6"!BV K1S1S4;2!L/I;![%
    M%?6X,:0Q!$[%]0:")>MO2L27S*@48ZU48J-,AW.)"6AZ12A G=S(;AIPJS
    M/1^>9[\A\/:M5C])1K3RY611">Z4V6D1_Z3*#Z/'\`80H\# `K:-C+T5X$U?>
    M+MP'\
    M+==65K^V+C@"+E85UC4P#.)S5K90%8.T>I9U`HYTEPIWI;K '=2IPIC(9Z,TN
    MG3IMKU8UKYK8]HG2%UP(4O9T9-0T2Q$NWK`Z>-GTS6XY8I7 BY;6[ZRVOGE:@
    M!#HL'$!+=0;K:,/P%9-K_UV,K98>,%'S`''+'F"HO0/SA[1 V@8IYDCKW!:
    M"XZ2NMIO&)Q:=-ARL-&X8-31Z-3F_W[V48(OPLHS6V';.7A ZW/GCX9]WY*O8
    M-PTPJR#+/R9=E6[_^3(]N\B@@"-ZXL[M9I_9K68?Z:,,UHW FGJBX_BKK90:+
    MOL#V7^8H01J2[H+JY(_'7!]$"RW7KR3)A6]O\.EM]+,2*-S 9)>F;>NGM-;7$
    M%0\QMPR2*858@BOKP!)C;2WHFZ4!,UJKPV'^Z96LPWYY%GO ]]/6SPQ,0
    MO>Z$S=\OT+Q--77*!D\W__71!-M,?S_`8"
    M'Z9&!(PV9`$H*R"S1#.H.1T;Q:)HUFV;=%O.!S:4EL[*LC+ HFA6:68BEL@PX
    M-0LSK$%2D2=G41[B`HA9[S0[STJ;LDPP/2M(A9(E*N:&XZ% !5DZK8>/3M\_MVAY%+']!65&9X7AY4]^]$L
    M]W#AQE6\+>,5:*^L_/TFW)@B6\)2")S=5VB%82EUJ5]HM!# BR='>TV.NFS2VQOT^C6_+H%6*K6>SGJ;3K_?68$MMYX(4>87
    M&0[D"K3YZ^CE;UK[[8/5`HEU6[
    M6&UB77)MU\38D"S.$!;[7+T)0K8[WFR8Z'!DE"_#ZUDD8`S .@6!I_BP:KI=6
    ML4I"(T>86TVX42Z-H!4'X*H0J#C&;FYM&!=/NK=A@"#GX\N X"O'/0D!NV&!A-_3(,2^ZB
    MBC_?VBO;T4_%_;AD^I=`G%;
    MG6@H2GS*,.P1U,#76/S^JEU7IT`SAQ+7:8;.UNDEEMH,CK, 9
    MPN@O60W(B:'^T`2[RCSES:6!#2"GT2R*9(@*7$-BP(6&&QE ^&FQ@K/&0+=*9
    MWQHT??9SL7JKJ,/65R]'3_A[V7SF

  27. Re:All for one and one for all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone explain to me how cracking the encryption is a "good thing" (tm). I ain't seeing it. All it sounds like is that it will make pirating movies a whole lot easier, which IS illegal. And I especially like how in the article posted on here it says "I guess that the DVD Forum doesn't want to see an open source project that can read DVD-Video.". Like being open source had anything with them getting mad at them. They would have gone after MS if it was MS who first discovered how to crack it. If anything, I'd send money to the prosecution.

  28. Re:A lot of issues - reverse engineering and so on by schon · · Score: 2

    Also I read about someone else complaining that the protection was very weak, and it was easy to break. Fine - if your front door is unlocked it does not make legal to steal your home. This is not a legal defense.

    You're missing something - nobody "broke into anybody's house".

    If your front door locked is broken by design, then yes, it's illegal for someone to break in. - but it's NOT illegal for that someone to tell you about it, or to inform the lock manufacturer that they make a shoddy product, or to broadcast to the general public that the locks are faulty.

    Nobody broke any laws here - they cracked the encryption for legitimate reasons. Your analogy implies that they broke the encryption and started selling pirate DVD's, which is untrue.

  29. Yes, you are dead wrong. by segmond · · Score: 1

    You are dead wrong. They were not doing it to show DVD copy-protection scheme.

    "According to CNN, the group was attempting to reverse-engineer a software DVD player in order to create one compatible with the Linux operating system. There is currently no Linux-compatible player."

    read http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9911/05/dvd.hack .idg/index.html

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
    1. Re:Yes, you are dead wrong. by um...+Lucas · · Score: 2

      I don't recall any mention of Linux in the article on wired that was posted yesterday.

      Quite frankly, I wouldn't be suprised if the "group" broke DVD for whatever reason and then just brought up Linux to deflect the argument somewhat. I hope that doesn't make me a troll.

    2. Re:Yes, you are dead wrong. by Mark+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Read Alan Cox's diary; he's been excitedly watching DVD's under Linux the last few days (granted, the dialogue seems to switch arbitrarily between English and French, but it's still early). Much of the Linux community is tickled; I for one had been holding off on buying DVD's and a DVD-ROM drive until such time as there was Linux support for them. For that matter, I'd been holding off on buying videos, since I knew they were effectively obsolete. If the film industry had wanted to delay the breaking of CSS, they should have seen to it that closed-source binary-only DVD-ROM drivers were available for Linux. It would have seriously diminished the motivation to break CSS. As it is, they need to realize that they stand to make more money selling DVD's than they might lose to piracy - think of the shot in the arm that CD's represented to the recording industry. The real threat, as someone else pointed out, is that artists can use DVD to distribute original work outside established channels. DVD is to the film industry what MP3 is to the recording industry.

    3. Re:Yes, you are dead wrong. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      This report puts it in a different light:

      > The DVD-on-Linux movement appears to have caught the attention of a Norwegian group calling itself Masters of Reverse Engineering (MoRE), who then reverse-engineered a software DVD player from Xing Technologies and discovered an unencrypted key that could be used to unlock DVD movies. ... MoRE also publicly released the trade secret CSS algorithm, which allowed the Linux programmers to discover the weaknesses that made the keys unnecessary. ... Once the MoRE programmers released the decryption keys and source code for the CSS decoder, the Linux programmers felt it was safe to speak up about their own work.
      --
      It's October 6th. Where's W2K? Over the horizon again, eh?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  30. Yikes! by Tet · · Score: 2

    I accidentally deleted by copy of the decyption code this morning. Arse! Does anyone have a pointer as to where it's available?

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    1. Re:Yikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most appropriate response is a campaign of selective assassinations.

    2. Re:Yikes! by technos · · Score: 2

      DeCSS is still available from the CVS repository. Details on how to retrieve it are available on the mailing list mentioned above.

      Hoard it in good health, I know I will.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  31. Not a prime... by llamayak · · Score: 1

    It's divisible by 2. :)

    Heh, check this out: http://www.theonion.com/oni on3311/microsoftpatents.html

    --
    "There is a fine line between genius and insanity--I have erased this line."
  32. Re:To The Ramparts! by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 1

    I don't totally understand the issue, but would be willing to help out if I understood what was going on, who to write, and what to tell them. Has anyone created a single page that describes the work of the programmer(s) in question, summarizes the copyright laws in question, offers one or more analyses of the situation, and suggests an appropriate course of action that people can take to help out? Having all this information centralized would be, in my opinion, a big help by enabling casual Slashdot readers like me lend a hand.

    Take care,

    Steve

  33. All for one and one for all. by osjedi · · Score: 5

    Where do we send legal defense contributions? Do not let these coders suffer for their efforts!

    --
    -=-=-=-=- osjedi uses Debian GNU/Linux. -=-=-=-=-
    1. Re:All for one and one for all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a note... the FBI/police/whatever doesn't handle copyright. Copyright violation isn't a "criminal" suit, but a "civil" suit -- the legal system distinguishes between them. For one thing, civil suits can only be brought by the person or entity that was harmed -- if you don't sue, there's no-one who will do it for you.

    2. Re:All for one and one for all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If its purely civil then why do the cops do raids and make arrests against people who copy software, music cds, etc and resell them? Making software to crack the encryption to the best of my knowledge is legal... Using it to make copys to redistribute is illegal. I feel for some of the authors of software that get ripped off this way. However i can't find it in me to be to sorry for music industry and Video/movie industry. They make an obscene ammount of money with their products and they play serious hardball with the distribution channel to make sure that they get the biggest bite. Audeo

    3. Re:All for one and one for all. by ??? · · Score: 1

      This is _not_ only about piracy. A big part of this is being able to _view_ DVDs on a system of _our_ choice. This is about _not_ being forced to use proprietary software for any purpose - entertainment or otherwise.

    4. Re:All for one and one for all. by earlytime · · Score: 3

      the legal action is to be expected. A reverse engineering job this significant was all but guaranteed to draw fire from the lawyers. I think the appropriate course of action is to fall behind a group with legal experience like the FSF or EFF. Then the real victims here can be defended appropriately.
      I think that any financial support should be routed through these types of organiations, at least so that the authors don't incurr any income-tax burden. -earl

      --

    5. Re:All for one and one for all. by WNight · · Score: 1

      The law is in place to punish people who break it, and award damages to those hurt by their actions.

      If you pirate a movie, and get caught, then tough. You had it coming.

      But, if you buy a DVD you should be able to use the information on that disc in any way that you see fit except for violating copyright by making and distributing copies.

      There is no legal punishment for watching a movie outside of its coded region. Nor is there a law against watching movies in Linux. Or in writing software that will read bits off of a DVD and do something arbitrary (probably display them as a movie.)

      Those things are not illegal. But the movie companies are trying to take away our ability to do those. Fuck em.

      Nothing illegal was done on either side, but we don't have any obligation to do things their way.

      They used trade secrets to make the product harder to use, all in the name of stopping piracy. Bullshit. They're primarily concerned with restricting viewing to certain regions so they can jack up prices with artificial scarcity.

      They have the legal right to encrypt data. But we also have the legal right to decrypt that data. They're saying the law doesn't offer enough protection (whine, whine) and taking matters into their own hands, and they get upset when we take matters into our own hands.

      This isn't a matter of copyright violation. If it was, they wouldn't harrass the author of the program, they'd simply stand back and let the FBI, or whatever regional authority step in and apply the appropriate legal penalty.

      This *is* a matter of pissy overly-protected corporations who throw tantrums when the world doesn't work their way and start sending in the high-priced lawyers to blackmail people into submission.

      I hope they get figuratively assraped by the whole thing. I was fairly neutral to the studios until this, but now they're up there with MS and Amazon, just another good-for-nothing company with too many lawyers and a monopoly based only on suing everyone who does it better.

      But don't let yourself feel sorry for the jerks for a minute. They have all the legal protection they need against real criminals. This whole mess is about them blackmailing law-abiding folks.

    6. Re:All for one and one for all. by Rares+Marian · · Score: 1

      How about ask the author?

      "Computers should be ... tools... (siglim 120 chars)" Like cars... to the office no more no less.

      --
      The message on the other side of this sig is false.
    7. Re:All for one and one for all. by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
      I was going to ask that. Perhaps someone should start a legal defense fund for open-source programmers.

      That's easy for me to say, I suppose, since all my money is accounted for till mid january. But I know plenty of techie-types that blow their money, simply because they don't care. So, instead, maybe a fund should be set up. Any legally-inclined folks out there?

  34. Re:Section 296 clauses 1,2 of the Copyright Act 19 by grokblah · · Score: 1

    but is it *intended* to circumvent copyright, or just play the dvd?

  35. Oh Boy by mochaone · · Score: 1

    That poor guy. He's going to have to fend off legions of corporate, monkey lawyers now. Someone mirror his stuff now before it's lost forever.

    --
    Hates people who have stupid little sigs
  36. Re:What's the big deal? Piracy costs industry zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..so theft is theft. Wait a minute..what was stolen here? Nothing!! People have hardware that they want to be able to use in a certain way. They experience a problem because the supplier wont assist in any way. They write their on software to solve their perceived problem. Now, if I wanted to modify my car it would be ridiculous to even assume that the manufacturer of the car would even consider coming up to me, prohibiting me from modifying the car. We dont license hardware - only software. If we choose not to use the software, then choosing to use our own software is perfectly fine. The problem lies in if people will use the code to copy DVD-movies - but that problem resides firmly with the person making the copy and retailer of the movie. No one's going to tell me how I'm supposed to use one of my own possesions that I have acquired with my hard earned cash. No one

  37. Correspondance with Creative Labs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A while ago I had an email correspondance with Creative Labs about releasing drivers for their DVD card. Their reply was that I should write to the DVD consortium because they have restricted Creative not to release drivers for Linux. (Probably our friends at Micro$oft had something to do with it). I was really surprised by that reply, and, now I will support the developers as much as I can ane we will protect Linux-DVD. FT

  38. Re:I'm not sure I understand by penguinicide · · Score: 1

    This may be a bit of a tangent, buy most versions of quicken are not y2k compatible if I remember correctly. I think quicken99 is, but before that I think youre out of luck.

    --


    penguinicide... when jumping out a window just won't do.
  39. Defence monies? by Parity · · Score: 3

    If there's going to be a major court battle, it's going to get expensive. I hear a lot of talk about what is/isn't prosecutable around here, but when it actually comes to a case, does the open source movement have a legal defence fund?

    I know the FSF has a legal team, but I've never heard that they'd do anything but enforce the GPL. Would they get involved in this kind of thing?

    --Parity

    --
    --Parity
    'Card carrying' member of the EFF.
    1. Re:Defence monies? by seizer · · Score: 1

      I doubt the FSF would touch it, but the EFF have been known to champion causes on these sort of lines...

      --Remove SPAM from my address to mail me

    2. Re:Defence monies? by Parity · · Score: 2

      Ah! Good point.
      Even if nothing comes of -this- case I could do worse things with my money than joining the EFF. Thanks for the reminder, I think I have a check to write now. (Besides I want the book... :))





      --Parity

      --
      --Parity
      'Card carrying' member of the EFF.
  40. Re:Actually, I've wondered about this myself. by Malc · · Score: 1

    "Anybody with a vcr has been able to copy any movie ever released to the VHS format, yet this industry has not collapsed so far as anyone knows"

    I presume that you are refering to copying one tape to another (using two VCR's)? It's not as straight forward as copying using a home VCR due to Macrovision. Macrovision plays with the gain in the VCR, effecting copies but not the TV.

    "If they were really worried about pirates, what about screen captures? What about split data streams? What about capturing the signal from the decoder and saving the raw output to a vcr? What about every other possible way to copy something that can be seen or heard? You simply can't encrypt something of this nature, so why try?"

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that MPEG-2 is compressed. A straight screen or data stream capture would require huge amounts of storage space and make redistribution tricky. I've also heard that DVD-Video also utilises Macrovision, making copying to tape difficult without some additional equipment.

    You're right: there is always a way around the system, especially if people are willing to sacrifice image and sound quality. These options increase with time, but by making it harder now, the industry can make bigger profits now.

    Personally I don't know why the industry bothers: I would suspect that the average consumer doesn't care for or can't be bothered wih pirating, or they'd be a bigger problem now with current technologies.

  41. film at 11:00 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Stupid people release broken, closed source product. 2) Smart people point out the flaws. 3) Stupid people blame smart people and make their lives hell. ....this "pattern" appears not only in software, but seemingly in every industry. i hope for the day when the bastards responsible for closing his site pay dearly for their idiocy. but they don't "get it" -- the smart people HELPED them find the flaws and fix their product...a product they refuse to make available to a significant portion of the computing population! (linux). dvd is starting to suck. yet another good guy gets his face slapped by the stupid and powerful. substitute (slapped,face) with an alternate (verb,anatomy) pair for a more vivid picture of what's happening.

  42. Sigh by Signal+11 · · Score: 4

    The emperor has no clothes. Sound familiar? Like the story, nobody wanted to acknowledge that the DVD encryption sucked - it was trivial to crack! I'm sure the people that initially released this knew it was weak. I mean... 4 bytes for encryption?

    Now somebody comes out and says "Sir, you have no clothes"... and boy is the emperor pissed! MS did the same thing with hotmail (bad hackers, bad!) - blame somebody else. Security is not about ignoring issues.. it's about confronting them. Make it public.. let people try to crack it. If it stands the test of time... THEN it's secure, and not before then. The movie industry just spent several billions on security training.



    --
    1. Re:Sigh by gargle · · Score: 1

      What if they were indifferent towards the issue of copyrights, but broke the security simply to show that it could be done? Would this be legal or illegal then?

      I can't imagine breaking a cryptographic scheme could be illegal. Cryptographers do that all the time.

    2. Re:Sigh by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      It depends. Did they accept any licensing restrictions? Does Norway restrict that sort of thing, either through its own law or by treaties that it's a signatory to? Is this a patent violation?

      If not, there's probably not a case against them.

      Breaking a crypto scheme could be illegal; if you open a package, but to do so, you must agree to a EULA not to do so -- and it's not an important part of actually *using* the product, then you're probably in violation. If there's no such agreement...

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    3. Re:Sigh by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      Nope. There's a large difference between saying (as in your Imperial/H.C. Anderson example), and doing.

      It may be rather easy to, say, run over your neighbor's cat, or for that matter your mayor, or to set fire to City Hall. It's also trivial to repeatedly mail-bomb somebody. None of these are legal, despite the fact that they may be easy.

      Since breaking the encryption was a non-trivial task requiring completely voluntary, openly discouraged effort, whether or not it was "easy" is no defense at all.

      Overall, this is not a security issue; it's one of legality. If the decryptors violated a license agreement, or conspired to distribute this with the intent to facilitate duplicating copyrighted works, then they're likely in the wrong. If they did not, then again the difficulty or lack of it has nothing to do with it whatsoever, legally.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  43. Re:Once Again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see how you can relate this to the linux community demanding free stuff. The fact is that the linux community wants to grow and all you Microsoft/Money lovers out there prevent linux from growing. The only way linux can grow is for the linux community to make it grow. It was obvious that dvd would never come to linux by a corporation so these coders took it open themselves to make it happen. Dvd is the only thing Microsoft has over linux and we want that to change. Anyway, it's not the coders fault that the dvd encryption was piss poor. I mean a 4 byte encryption? What the hell? That's like putting X+2=4 and bitching at the linux communtiy that we published the answer is 2. To some Ignorgant/DUMB people, the x is a code and unreadable but to intelligent people, it is 2. Don't blame these guys for being smarter than the encryptors. The fact is that the encrytion was poor and should have never have been used if they wanted to keep it encrypted. We don't want free dvd movies, nor free dvd players. We just want to be able to play them in linux and that's all. Go back to college you microsoft lover.

  44. Archive and mirror by Doomsayer · · Score: 0

    Could someone put up a mirror of their CVS files and web pages? Maybe put it all in a zip file so it's easy to pass around to many people. Are there any public open source CVS places that you can just leave a source code folder?

    Eventually, they'll be able to get their web site back up; but, hopefully we can help them continue the work no matter how many sites are shut down.

    1. Re:Archive and mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Done and done. DVD CSS code in .ZIP format:

      www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Po rt/3224

      Grab it quick, pass it around.

  45. Let's see what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    begin-base64 664 css-auth.tar.gz
    H4sICIU0IzgCA2Nzcy1hdXRoLnRhcgDsXG1z20aS9lfxV0yy qVi0KRlvBEg7
    di1fU67L5lKbVO6ufI4LIkERK5LgAqBk7W72t193Pw3MUJaz 2Vzs2q2KPkDi
    YHpmuvvp7mdGABdVdZYe6vWTBx/ux/MiL0n69Nvzkvj4t/48 8BLP9+LQ95Po
    geeHXhA9MP0HH+HnUNVpacyDdVqv05tq/b5+/+j+v+nPovH/ H9KrbJVvsg/h
    f9/z4jh6n//J2+J/cr+XRF5A/aOoHzww3m/+/+A/6yxdZmVl npsGCefrTl3V
    y+vlm+LiT3wDn84L26PoXKebfJnWWdOn+Xzca5HWTQdupY96 f5lVizLdXmxI
    oNNJN5unOospsyqrDf2V71ZFI9XRFT01n506a+vSR11/t3Ny uVjcvX1WmM9+
    3+noKCzdrKh7dxnrZgDbQ6Ub1Vj8SO37pr/ToVnAJkt3Tzsn Z+XWnK3MI7KC
    qtv0P9a701nmVX3G4Ui2O2ljdPKf3/zPy6+/bE385I+z0fQP M/NOEJv/7ZxY
    MetZ827b4rivOnthe+qa3CZZ7F3JxsOL40kcG98jcOQB0ZrM dLpYmvPzZxyX
    i+uVBRQ3fHZqTdM13c6D335+nfxvAfGR838Y+UFf8n8/9pN+ HHL+T8Lwt/z/
    MX6ePOqYR2ZS7G/L/HJdm9NJ1/jD4dBMszK7MvP0ZnGozBdL /vT7ap/TH+eL
    YvuCpFjwu3VemUWxzMw2vTUXmTlU2dIcdtTN1OvM1Fm5rUyx Mt9TlsyLnQn4
    A9/58puvejxCSRlUGiRvNRluVZRmmdVpvqnOMdWTTueJTknZ x5TFoc53lB6X
    hamKLSfQoqRZ891lM0N12O83OS2HEmxKa6MxMx5gQfWGu2W7 SxrhtGvqgkdh
    kW2a78xNUV6dt/odjVxlGalT5dt8Q6CpWSilrF3sMnNxKyPk u7zO040hVF1m
    rDmPwjems29Nurksyrxeb3vUD7J5bTZFcVWZTX5F0vXDyvyJ IEnLzXYYuC5k
    iPLWpLslrZC6VcWqvknLjExEtpeFbYob8owxLx9uza6oSXm6 rTOwfLqoD6Q3
    DbJcVjTSbb1muRp6V9niQAu7ddXepTWP0RhzfVitxGzkcBmX Wy/yurprbpbf
    p5TUM3K+eXidlnm2qx8aXi+b8jLd5QySU1ZHXJfvrrOyzpbd nmEdG4td3NZZ
    O7oz4mJNipDzsnfGvOs1aU5rxh3ZO0sX6wY3rMUyX60I1rsa 0yoIy0rsdTop
    b/f1f2S3fpfcQOtgo14U1KfkJe03BPcbcqVIWSXbZTZL+Tbf LdgRTZjQ72JH
    bigPO/qDbu1pQCppV4bUIp167MJrRuKSxQBYFqxTKpJmWebX mWgjmGT/5dt9
    WVxnEkjpRb5x3NhMfhQwbLOqcEEshhHVaHaG3KI4bJYmo5kE OhdVXRJ+eKAt
    YXjDMtytsWUbaKnjpiVftxQOu8vGoceIcsKKgmCdVojDc8T6 72jpmwPp/all
    L58SD7zdZ8tsRRmmyi93NOWmIPlDGDzrdCjk6nxhrot82cR2 vquN+qYneCLV
    dhRdj/Ld/kBNpNiBFLvYFIsr84jUodYuDSVjtAh4/zAtFO8O dZXddjt/7Zzo
    mkSGPL1900q8ek2s+K9+L+x5vaTX75mgN+zFvag3+JEWcCIS zI3qxfqV771+
    1jnhVeR8j5PjaU7iw2cmNy+eG++ZOTvLiYSeNBI5j27nujN1 /vo1j6NGajVT
    4Z7h1T/r/MgZFxke0Z9VNugJgSrHbpOsJJM0jdVhsZY8wc6/ 8xOZsxfmk/Ce
    OyHfMRHfaQbi2Z4aqht8xzPHs/DNe4bxpXNwzx1PpvYFY0dO Dj6gk+OeT74N
    e4Oe6ZOvI/J4IE5+R1Dnhxi503vrpT1D14FcM7ku5Hoh16Fc V3Jd9kTCFwlf
    JHyR8EXCFwlfJHyR8FXCC0Tek2ss10iuoVx9uSZy7escIuGL hC8Svkj4IuGL
    hC8Sfv9jw/nIkPr79UcGt/HeB27B3r3g/iT6VcBtwjvgHh8q wvcHhDfjOewx
    simHDXqCdnL6z0G34ih1cASMA5Gpg8hMkec56I4suhW9Awe9 C5UIHfQnFv2K
    7gsH3SuV8J1I6Wuk2EgYaiRIzP0Lo5sR8l/CyE19U5iv5t/+ kdjlKXHYJRXO
    VVlsQb+0HktJVK7MzKurzPMy22UlH1HwIISQLAWj31fZYVmc lUSdaCQGK9FP
    kHPuSQ1NbyERQkeJutDm4SLnyk2EmTjIHpSUWYDQqUVaEtOl qGunTYmU7dIN
    D1Jlfz5kTGnund7crHOKS47omqj+EhybQvrAPK+N14co88TV CnJS1VDgjBgg
    DXtmNsyvkAyq/C9qHmrAMC7FFLIodhVatyLOc1lmmQn6yiiZ 1BAnKja3u2LL
    u4Ji9ZSF3/7gh+Yx/erLNZKrT1ffGZ04eUFjfPXt/M7wDGJn +NN9SVSuJl7Y
    vX+q/jvDv+SdxcPaXO2KG5OvlCFaYZDEdlyzLZaHTUHR3RDl Q4Wt255Pggjp
    2/Rtvk03Z4TOvFgq1NRU3PProtbdyA0z2SvBgoEjWDNhoGJI gaWQxeyGMnO+
    qsWRPAj5mBbAPFyEiaE292kgviv4o90qh1yWVuI6QT91x5Ia JDLusi2tHChh
    rJZEd0velwgrbTedLqlsIPmG0XYqQa+ckfdzNSPnTg7VFFtJ HiWWajarqqRM
    xb/8Z5o4BPIc4lSQXjrEPtvZTVyjgmxOK7bijsL4nl6dE1Kx 2YRep5uDMv5d
    sTv7S1YWjY1uOBZv2v1qDjNtxf4yBraFGSU+7ubOkoq9OMyy +pz7PumciF6U
    xU6rsxcXr7zX5osvCKdd8zdt8aVlKA1oCV6bz83fqQv35PZB 21luJZTGZFi/
    HTa0g3Ah8Oi3tEeSIB8/hi/4b2QRzrWdE9rac7HJUVGpAVYn 23BP5GdWiHr3
    uFXERMUvzOCZefyY/uzKEBAs3qgT8Yf/jP02arbXsrnzRVxA zcZRwSbzybQn
    Ogwrd4q/XrwwQdQ1Pxjns3/ns3f82Q+6XbIVQ+nkxJh2RPzR WFancuf123l9
    GSdux5XP7w7rN8P6d4alTp3f0ZaMN4Jm/PI77/Rtl4Z+KwN0 j275uMVXnlN7
    8BxtUXhuPmkW+FhrweOmyZPlNK6V8Rq5rtxi5/3tORbR3uHl qt9/7JzQ9dHZ
    mSae5wDByY9cOWhzfXp2xsn/hfFQQl0C8222KDOiLs+OWr9H Aa7utn/Hm3Xv
    3lb/3tbg3taQW9tjL4o4Kn5M6fhAA3zAZrJKtuSU8SjLMC+Q Yw9JeHKIxNFM
    O3MJcj432lO946J72Beokot1kS8yrZkuR7Vb+lMimCb0u24N bI+0aBNfZZsV
    lYJdvj9sUj67SU3kIVkIt6AQFEbRNsMP581YzhmPCDzkJDPw Gm7xspZ8mle1
    e652NIMkPD32ksp+kTU2Y8pTbPiYTA6YiH20y+A0p6KcDeS4 SdiFUXaxO2wv
    stIhQ0VZnb9THv4/Zw5cH9C3IgLMJydcUpbZW+HRjkCdbff+ fY1BU07YWq9C
    T3Jiy0IpRc2lYIBYEJTFGw7x01phtzZcBG7YwbWe5VZacWw5 xWlvelFc87kV
    0zuRsoyx2VCRVHti1pSMlhj3hRArNWZeLDqeX4AXy+peMYeh jz80cSh/a+Tk
    oupxcf5crBAMmRoTiaOw4Iae+VzG7qpJJKbY2IwW0aVel8Xh cs2EQo4DBTE4
    KBXVCOIZmd2GWnuI6ASdQUiJQBsfjdrkYNKqTRwNhbfqNC26 xq+JovFScIAL
    h/OptyxqnTkpgUJkRiVHpi0aUge+QAsC1ikmuYDXOSUBpnJM Df58yGssVs8E
    3/UQIGmazYv6Stvgofx1V+ssoZZa4YDWb02nZ04XzYfykfv8 vXFo00C2kqJ1
    BIi7nTRTtp95VZzUO61YRM3PTfMJkfEzdbMz36ed12hnu/1i /YJfpl9wpF/w
    S/QL3qef33f1C36hfnf6/0PN7vW3d0eqGeXjONr/tRz9iywR /JOW+JCQ+FUQ
    8a8b0b+Gj1HReV/yzyl3h3BaaonTMu/tWA6pEjncGsjx01QO vSYT+Xssf4+k
    T9hjAZxwzWd8DX175tWX07WZCGPQKBCBOLQHcXPpFGC8oRWb z6XPWASSkT3v
    xdS+XIeymEhmGE1xdvbjs/sZNatHg0MhmXoiKk6kJRjclWu4 9bFZ5jCLLLEv
    LVNZSTS1xplBy2ButcFyR3JsGMu1Ly2DkerKAnOR9sSOsYwX ytrmMk9fzJ/g
    9BIzTKRr0Le2C+QayjUO7FFlEInAqG+dmshs/dieOAahXd4E S/JGqlC74hkW
    Jte+zDOG+YcigA/BxLp2LOPNxBhhoF3hNRYYiEAiCxjB56LV VK4D2FCGGAww
    g3wIRxaY84n1JoTHouEIM4xF0RDGnVt1E+nqS8tQrlPoMBrZ dUPR4dSGhO8Y
    fQp4hok1JVYMbI8BDXhG5h9NRADrHmNs4A8tMjbQHgxUQxbo y4pjWYBGD+Ag
    s8Wx/TfJGEuCNbAkgA+n1bHMoG6VIYa6JOk6k0mHI7uMicww cGJ/7IsAPArH
    TZ3YR+D2ZbZQ2vszYEmsFIs1hrFFDmaYwhgiECXQIbFdYdZZ ZE0J8E2wbMww
    lqZBbHWAxQZyTQIHy7DSKLAzAGRDpCDPZrG5+CcE+BDm+LdB In/PEvt3Atgl
    Ch9JdfJhkNhlhADI1Ga0WV9RzAKKfpl64ORJhC7ie470BSvh Pwexb2/D35EI
    R3ObJ0eIaSQ8LCkEKCY2NhAnyFS0SFG6b+2juJ/YTqPQik0B DeQiH8l5YFPB
    DL4Pbdyp0gAWisDQszkC6RExiKTmw6yYdDCzC4MOKDb4dw/i PuhD6alFa4As
    FFiAKIqQ4RUawCOQk9gAAq6wGCA3mdxbOnxbOhA9UWIxP4Pj xzZ9zZp03Gn/
    +wRcIJfCp/2pzaXIFZHm6YHF3xCl1ikmcBqsFSNUoIAWIaSv 0Mmic1vr+nBR
    JNKz2AZJ6FmLR4FmaDYsDDhzas14YmN4irw6sVligrSLBcBK +McbchL+MdcH
    mnw1iY0tBAxuIEOHoQ30caSLlIoc2iDBimcwa9/iH7Yao14G kfUAlMZ/+eAs
    ZFFv7OgwH9oMjeUhDIOpRmybKzxEbyzmGww1elqaBSy68Euw JIQyatc0sT5B
    2gXm4+bfljahIGA0eme2gqIdfkjgOMABJQ+JEJQrkPaJCIwi vStL8u3taWRB
    DpYEzwCUCaw0dEjUaGItA4Qi0wFvVIoloQxscXABN3YqJVw5 hlkBhJFDokDT
    hgh6z7EhqBQCBQUEXu/PbKAji6IlVtI7tERjjqkRNE6KAa58 oBV4bHlDyzwR
    D27FGQ6cEg77BDNbLgDpcODQTs8pf0gnAByizP1vtZK4ucMf QcpAPqOJtZIG
    1thJir7DuqAPKjyMC26RTHRhEtOxxQwKnzrOtxBEVKoAxhg4 7AVgRi6Cl2Cl
    OHKoFMoF1g3ePRjbxAMnKtGBQeE+eHQ2s9kWOIUrR33HSnMH akgIoOiAhpKh
    xOGPKH8ohQC2jh1Zk8yje0tH8M5mDLkUXMupwAhMxHMcOzlu OrcPFQSx3Q0g
    xYBX6GpnoROfsaXhKNZYZzxWLcTiIxvicBfMBVo2dx5q0CwK hguqAToAHhc6
    OQ6VTTNQiIwPbtu3xQkMEsBDyvRBOIYDZ7M6tBRg4ttUBkzN FASRTVaoWqD7
    GjwTZ0eFYESUKgEObXiARSDtA4qR4jKxFQz5BhjBwySAM3hc CB2mTraMYltA
    lKv7DgeD41BZkMDnA5saJwObGhHuWsKx1QJRmjibb5B+JEst TtDBm9qkiFQy
    cZIYti/R0EmKIDrYTGHLoltUz+a7ke+WjsAmK+wAlCo4saW7 Ed/ZVIN6gEMn
    ocMOQ5vKfJSOydhJ6UN7UIEHa5T6J1r/JcfNLbVDXQTTwj4A ZASxPdbTjKll
    7MjHyKhIX4FvKYkHeOu5SKJkqeUTo9hyGDxnFMFxyJbY66Fq goygUnszm8om
    uqme27wWz20pmoe28KEqDCGgFSy2lDjxLBuLRvahphHAh8KH kxdl6QObRZGz
    URsGUBr7vpF7bBPYag/Ci315iLQ7n9p9zdAhn9gODSd2qzeb OhQflRJsSDfB
    Yz0M4OtMKZYEkHswEFr6hK01diNaLSCACob9i3K5wO6UUVJQ +UN35wT2ghI1
    crjKBKEz0jMegTcqFTbSnt1r+s6hRzT7iV1HaEsHAgNhiBSM JILUiBQ88TSt
    SCWY2ZwAdADnWDkggkyruMRO16XbKpDY+qjbZw33xMYtsOg5 hEx3I4ETjLAE
    EitcDqQg3GF3VLMBUBM2kdmmdLjcc6t+Q/0l3CfWMsg6OE1B 7sEiW+5oXYSk
    iFqMvAaWjoBR+oekqBk/saU1cLaeqNRIxwlmgIM0Vh3yqiUl sXHmQUDDY+p0
    ddgcloREPEQW9ZyNFdyE/ADShOINdCpTRGJHAdHjJIc6IZCQ yuaBsyHFmSWY
    BKo9yAiS1XDkZCAkPAXF1DoRSVGrXDOEWCmxfAIlHCvWLe/E acGSZs7OEtlf
    ua1TQICDQJcU2MUg0yHowbqAAMyv8EYdQdnGNg4mVjo5sSTO Gzj7S8BYyYjj
    Ad0OTRwqhRDBThXxjZKHTkOHjI9j57R06Gyhdcc5cGDvKz23 p3RIrOqyqWVD
    wPJRACUO4cRJDaJs4pwXwUpTKA1IYxmAgDewG0jUGrhvrOex A2uZwciqDkqL
    RaIqqKfBTED+tDrGdw8lVZMjeM+dXUzfVgKYRFPO2CkdiDKt /GNLCqE6yuxc
    z1tmtlxgrUrCpzaMkConI+eUDmhVeun89wCxFg6czAcroWiA Y8FKysamFldK
    Q/RR5p93FR1CqwOsAe/GTmTHU4esgccjMYI/ggjCce6/G/Rw A7sNVICJ81x0
    3/ExNBnw/3l+e6323+/9X7xK/mG+/+Onv/8h7nsxvv8jijzP 9/n7P+Ik+u39
    34/xgzdgikPJryKmi6v0MsP7jvwMv7wjWp13Omm3efyuTvOd vsrID3Vl5aoo
    8cA2IckwkrIdMV+8dLkvi7pYFJteh19PSZtnqfgRpmzJz6Hx g3T6tJSZfj/l
    FyEX+theulhklbzTKcKyznRTFRiGH9fiju3bwyJ5leEl2Tqv Nxl/4rVf3Fl7
    urMPTWKZ+gIEK7DM2gcs7cu6soCqaB9gX9AQN/y6Ba+Zn3Pv jHhh+sbiUt+w
    5Icts6pmI1yW/M4ELfemTMs93S8O+r6pPDsn5uzok13NPDwA 3tE9VNnqsMG0
    F1ljc7GMPDXZjH80P77HoWfwxRL0u/lKDbZP81UNzfdqNEPj EbjCHHZ4rLCx
    62mVXjfPm8m7qvyWibyqyw+gv23fDnUNb2g0BlNePWUP4vst nuxT/o6Jgr9U
    4skyu84XmePem3yz0Y78lunoy5dT511jefVV3nm4lHdgiwMe +M8rGYFVEJvl
    W0IvlCGz4UF3a8xLxvZNWewuBViq/89YlwNtPNiIbmJPMk92 ZBx91JVBj/fa
    9VWUxaGUZwWXeSngv5WX0cnon7LkGUl+Kss63RJCVO1rvCVN epRZ96fXbJ6I
    HO5c58useFNXT67r6o3nv/HPr4uLd619pJe+Br2zcdV6lB+N FWF9WLiiXjSg
    qEfwUoTIk7j3Ky3CqrjVW8a3ik8LJyzs3IoxDku83MEPqcpd TR4M016Hpkm3
    DVDbkQ2+R4WfXOUmn9v4cVX+EEiHrF7I7E2MvBcO07zi51ir 5r116tu+sLJf
    31ZkxQ0irP1ChT1/D4ALVA3TSl+CvmSlNvymTXWkjOEHqt0H vvlI4VBpKm3S
    x3G+RRdRRUPcvDqr1RK74jV92prtPrukkr/MC2oy3Hb9zX7r B2HUj5PBa3bq
    G7bYXahoatRHgfkxWH5qWhGAMOB3qGp+SWyJ4HxZd/g1lar9 fofKAbqIwP//
    jQYk/juoaUMFb5fRMlbpYWOVwhv1AsGCn+pu7hMS/6+9a39q G8nWP4e/QsNU
    EjsYYvnBM3CXADPhDkmoQGZ3i2Fcki0FV8B2YUOSu5n92+/5 vtPdasnikcxs
    7txduwohtbqP+nH6vLr7HFYb3hXmgDTz2ejPO6YiCDTSPbtm Z+8H0ngUjNFM
    PQHqGvTcwdeTSCApc8htKndhwKFSOKj0KZmQuPd0e3Rwbd/r 18YBJ2mNu4V1
    k7mrCId3JMR9hG3FSbC90zTn6ZZY931TzYHwAp488emwGx8t kSGp4NP5cIxa
    HyrbMDlYvyuSVswfoaWJ4ZDn9qtB8GL4AYekzImx4CfTmLmK 9O7FUI8HDbg3
    WotU9ZCQqQrpCtEbRwxtF58nKUjGWPphDi8P944ohyTYrZ2J DFEwvor1+J9Q
    z+Ti6qPle/QaYHwNqMcEwoejADPK+8KHFTGFJazPGW4hzAiz u0glT8LFtVNQ
    ys92Bi1eh4fB4mdMmwYmv3TAItB+MQ0W5+ZevT7eW5fBH7qT Zkq7Pg2v3BGt
    M7CHSAjZ5SA5t6cUB93h5Wh4yXMSPHGhP0hB/WF3cm5pBhlb 0qfjidicmxPK
    giOR0lEQQgTptwe9y+RD8HNyLrhyZmHJsPx3Iqi9/TEeJo/H mp3EaB8H49Cv
    WlDwkO5ZMmcbzFizgKQxj2W42A5pj3qqYM4rPWW3pDxPcY/C JOktksOnuDYs
    qArhn0ddcy6Nm89xWo+HPtP+oFc1wyY/1n6MDCBCHz4saRcu 9d7Pze2wEiJc
    mLyHWmetJL2nRMYrxSQbm9ejZPD8aDcwbruUaFxEn2K6Xjk/ t8DUBYx9Ogbr
    BQqC6BPRIeE4eUuPpozP6DQDJyohvcJZBzGTRNNCovMMkKGx pW88MmZ8z1wK
    1i8RX4WuqPh1HokECVGcXxRUsJBi8I4LwTR8/kgqhmnHE7SP QYheRpPL/sfH
    0tM8CElBFPT2nRCkOIJsN7SQLpKspS8FyQPyBnfSN98uQ2TY PEpWQtUndOJB
    CiLDZLic/EQSkc86CV5pFuAIc4QQhsoefZIcF3Y8LAodooY6 1QRfRNSgrQOu
    AuPYwoLapsR1XM0NFc7ZXaCt5yAIlrwTLRRxe9KQyYfEUCP2 8LXxTkTvM/pj
    Y9CpizIdRK2YTMBohwP51u4PehB/bW3taRg+rbfn/g30/8zN yrfW/0XtX1H/
    X62w1V5Zof+vVn2m/3+L35RDHZkjl1y3wnlE74yZOaD2ID5p n27MYY1LaIGQ
    4+AP8ZWzUQqt8cdB+11eMP6NLZrT7hu/tf0vDFfa9YL9r9UO Z/5fv6H/Pzf4
    5mRv5g9wyhegPfz7JqFoYZ39XZf497NZdxPaCzOlhAodRfSx qiZRsHN0BOUE
    uhJlYF/reisCAFxdAJbKG1Zm0qOr8NHjSecCOuo2RfLKPAc6 b2LPBGh/uHS2
    lU8678eaBicbOK/eq3Q6Ij9cfex0qnPfBy6vyE8iUTAvDlCn wdMngcuJT/lg
    IRblP3U16MvX8mlpV6RAJBV8nvmuUefdjgJDnNBUyNwjSNhR qGdomstxjWdp
    whoXf8yl25ZLUv/tt41bgDQskBUsAsn/RldKxQ2UB7j6GoAk twMJ40JN1uq2
    fA81WW3VsOb4m7dDorQ9DYXSSJu/oz0GyAr2JH11ewo1+cr2 NA0U7Hj9yvaE
    cQHIV1WlaUe5ge1h8j9G2WYKKAAQRTWswAoUIDbm4XiUdPup QPsv77h7CeSW
    hVzHVsx/cJOFAZriGz3092p6I+Sbav3E3LhzcI8MyteCRwZv zZ0gX829brjX
    Dfe6kb1uusSmTWw6QNIUSXz19uDA68y8fAQjVkeynjTqrdXM c0M+ExU95oLE
    VJ5HSaEFM5d3a2gXSOjHJP/KujQoeTV+3x+N7Ks5CDy9YQeK JxPMM80euRQh
    mbnni9G77FmoezzkwXWT8D5JRh3YaYpJcFgdLPpOQY6Od17v 7lVGtagW17q1
    HlyAjKrwEbO5KYT/0aMAjyEfY/vY4GPXPjb52KvmnTxeDTpC KCnTpb2++uBJ
    e0N1tpPr5ifjUU1QKRkbz1wfLvsTOOv5cFkLJJWOe856l/If RziNNxDYwCsE
    rANRCzBMVdREb3B8dGHBjBLPiqZB5TvTXlOGi/T2gtkaR1Xj TSYV3jWuzL8a
    TlThzTTaXwbzEEOFr16qZxP5io7qBtexhN0k6tDEfFRHGL4T Hrwbcp1J2tfp
    0xfOAx0Tw3QXghDupkz1TsImfO1gK0XVNsCOVzIuqXyMyssE Nnr7C+rtWv0D
    Ml/1d6N9CpcxcneCfat03SN9thCYlDZP17JyC5tmEOTtcq5d Jq/gyufPtmDo
    PwiefLfJHYpeIvwESVrcNR19Y+99QUUVO4JNm7p6isrKX9P2 WyX7Ono0rRNT
    QNlNNcxAcepxqIpjJVUKknOZZiYnpqBMgAyuwKsI0YfjI/t+ MQirGBNQ1ZeH
    ez8G27Te6DDcBj8HVTqrZ4DAzuzDsOjVbZpmcALRRgRTEAiA oR6LxmGQGznt
    M1vt1frnilcMHp7sTHDdK5jQUhjTddcB40WbkR9aeJZ3gytz 2JRcN6PjCK2O
    TrPucMOQUnUuNB53MrnLzuGMkuts9GGh71ZTi05KV4zjKX7X EUqO+HjkZqIl
    PIFSE+R3Y2NJaVYGszFfQLobnSz/FF7VQvDLCH5qz7rCi5sm RQoukzwY/1hS
    dynDBgjRGwr9GWWFDME0zR9hnD5cbmgpttglOF9KAm4rqAN/ TZZnBlq1cNpd
    STnWijvJx/6kgmeScEMf+Wr9ixa0ouvD0fSCVoGq8mONnKcn 5RW6sLgZzIfz
    GdvuqyekcdKJLt8pz4m6NVPiSXTNGiO1K6BFRZCPGDQw/RHS 4+OH/qR7Vql0
    5Z2qEhVAia5rwXw0WT8cXV+s103N5+306MKC+zh6DFR+4Hi5 zjWZsCmNyuq3
    RuesFjjUAj6n1jKxMLb3Gy7fyM9HVlGabaLZbOdI1aUjyjJe u4paISM0PMx+
    oqzUhZYiIXXSRzQZ9iv6JemLZwGJvHm7FTQbSkU93Kne40vh Y0Em3jXcXdPd
    tVgPvW+71GV3t+LuVrMBoejUlWnyuP747hrsvf5h3VFnuRCj 8NYsLfLlVKMc
    DEFXW0hyesPmyAY9mIlYHQbrlAEfXCaTq8sBbeGDHhG+T6eN /cEtiByJ4JOC
    LGbCbHoSNtSvFIYp7REPkkElW9StBa87b3Zfvzr4e5XsbzFU HB7JfBheVua7
    EfxOolDgyijlQktDpQ0Eb6SvmpO1rfj1nS9+5eFy10IeLpY7 QdCmP+K9MQ2K
    4D3Em+Q6NaUhW4KKXSBbflTohas7+lTRzqmZJWZ+GG+iiXvD /yXp87amU31q
    c9y7P7OdFHd0qONmtaDN7mzf2JcFmF/QmWjnxagSXZ9E/VO0 c17FIfRiapST
    jOF57bYlyttteILX7J9fP9cdCHmRWTNaYN4L28rpXtKKf6cy AKUCNl9aX/G6
    LENHq5laMu13jplxTQPYaCrofXU+lo4uZY6lFa2Y9M/xEEvt D8+vak6B44No
    ekJGcQ/2NWeFj7HLVrO6IOHmxsFUoo4Zfy/7rx+r55vZfxvt OmJ+mfgvzWWs
    /yzX5d/M/vtN7L8BPYnnJV9nCC6aebmJ5RZT722WY5uFuxo4 Zd2ezPRq0NV1
    Wq6Z22pYq7AxdsBqhCLcTPbkgR8UJjiaYENJf6DbQpIx3Kq/ 4QK5v0/BOCTs
    GGe/J6cmrEb8SeidhlIp8atuF4QT69nQbBqFE8RwKQh+6A/6 4zPj31W3n/V1
    fftWYCUbZqH839tqPWVeLjMb37a+p33HOup2VfSFcYSoAXgM qL5njIoGvad8
    pxvT0Fq36dPV3D/+JpUSwOFJo718ujn3D3Nggacg5C6u8YQC T6ry6IHcIW0F
    ac0Ed7g08djAi2U8NnBZRtpKzAMKPRRco8kRmep41cJjHZcW 0taQ1kPBNVx6
    eKzjRQuPdVxaSFuL7ZkhnmWSO5hHV2k5pqWVNlukhUhr02SK S7tBEyfe4nEV
    ly7SwlTrCBPoGi690FpVWmvWFt1CGo26vdUaz/PJnTO8tPBY x6WFNHNcrNlD
    D+DShA25AWvrMh4buCwjbQVpTdi+V3Bp4rGBF8t4pFF8GWkr elilh4JruPSQ
    qU6rMh7ruLSQtoa0Hgquda2Jt44XLTzWcWkhbU0httG4EBea vVdptqYxeM0a
    sEOktdG4EJc2HlfxoovHVVy6SDOHymnvXqNRGZ1dRxe38FjH pYW0NaT1MABr
    uPTwWMeLFh7ruLSQtpZaDyc8sCV3QIhVoEEXj6u4dJEWIq0N JAlxaeNxFS+6
    eFzFpYu0ULEnRsG0SZMZ7Op4leAxwiVBWoq0GAVTXGI8RjFX JXCHS4K0NLa+
    rHhkx5jrGw27fNDgQgLSVpDWRONWcGnisYEXy3hs4LKMtBVt dYwBSHGJ0dkR
    ujjBY8S1EaSlSIsxACkuMR4jvEjwGK1y4QJvdWTaQJIQl3bb rkl08bjas+sc
    IdLaQJIQlzYeV/Gii8dVXLpICxV7YhRMcYmRKcKrBI8RLgnS UqTFKJhyiYfr
    GFxSwWOES8JliLZ1sMNDczzfz4NPPAPN86M81swj1jzDxRPC PETI4+I8E0XH
    Azwl505TcQ2FixwxOjtCFyd4jHBJkJY2aPnFXWSXoSK8SCK7 6pIgLU3niqeH
    6QybTm3rPgnNbLLEf5K5upuKpH+cDqQtJBykdUR9zmVOVM4J htYw1IyTIDST
    zWA9iWBoBoUYbggeZzWnbJjaicHRD7v2FKUhNqTwRNSG60xi MAk+qRVJEbGV
    xJ2jwa4m1RfkNQfXzEwgISPVI5qTo3CgOKqcIuQeJJGkf2Q1 nB1EAes4bM1S
    VzIJ0gcSPFIzEhPyB5Jd0mgSDvIWkjnSRDIO4x2NJIRcgaSP dI0shNSDU4T4
    T3ZBykOCR+pIskLOw4nRVpQlSSe95jQnByTKEh/JLjnDSchJ 9ckadYWxbrGa
    U9/4g1hJLWMl9yBrWIkt4eDsIOqTC5PorBgmYagMmfeKNwlI ccmA1wyDMhyX
    hHrNMARyV0OUyQnJ5tZSy5TJeda61iuGYQPkvSTFq45ckEaT FZOPkEmQHpPt
    kt6QmJAfryqGk8RytpJIkKJwKpJak7iREnIakzKT/JC2kIxz BpNsxoo9kSM2
    pPCc8JEjkqQEJPikViRFnPUk7qSyJKGk+pFiOMUXci6KC5QF yOYouZA9k/eS
    pVHqoZBAiYIiDbkjmXJPsYfMlpyUjIyyCYkyKS4FGfKwrltQ ptBC/kdSTLpN
    5tZVDE9Ty7RImUl209gSN3IUsgtyOBLG1BBgQwnJGFOPcZCk k16TXJIDkhWR
    z5BdklKSkJPqkzWSypIBkVuRhCbNW0hoeNIOGzkSShpFIsBZ RjQmnnAg2NL7
    5ZtBnEGcQZxBnEGcQZxBnEGcQfw3hkgR8yk2QdOObE7l9TQ2 tIt6AwswT0ND
    Cs3FC7KBepwhuqjZU/mhzkmxnFozFQvqcxR5qaVT2aL+SDWA GjAVGepmad36
    fDIaEhXdrrNiUPugEpk46xs1Miqt1D1oBomdLSRVvYeWBt1y 2rJqAvuMChH1
    UIrqtBpQ+aM+S7WEmjsVMOqUqXFp6Mw/VLy7zjpJrYnKb+Ks RjQ8UommLkT1
    PnY2zrRrvUQZ1ZEaO5Ua2hyollEbpsJAuwdHmBo5FSvaFKga UttNje8sZ9al
    maDrrGo04FAFT5w1mDouzQDU5mh4iJ1tLo2svy+jytKCQCWL thKqk9TiqejQ
    DkN1mhYCKnq0hRApqaWn6leq7syRNFt0nbWcOidNB4mzYlLn plmC2iUNJrGz
    uaeqNdPIRD2c5g9qiDTgUMelaYHaFw1G1PtpyqBGSmMMdeqV MNP26s78yynW
    ddY3qsS0bCTOakwzAS0pVIhpu4mdDS9VT1Q0etEuQHMMNVYa nqib0yRCrZEG
    LNohaKCkjZtGJNoCaN4wZsK6M1vSGtR1VnWq8qQKibN20mxB yw4VdNqcYmeb
    T3s2GoexYtB41HXrHbQQcPkjcXZoWlJ0C3XTmrdit2qSGlfH sTV60HZF9Z7W
    MhoUaBei6kyLHQ0vtE2RhtEaRqMG7T7GyFx3Cxw0qHedfTly u9UTty5Cyw6N
    VbQ50CwXOyt1qrYCWhhphKEtjeYGWvloCKE9iyo/LYg0BNFW RpMHrXg0xtBe
    5ciuWbTiKptdOVQ3AOefdPWqP8DxLx6L5ynVstWqsgifWAV1 i/4a4JNL/Xrb
    vzB3/YFQ7Ul+nzEDgNLQcD6s6c1Zv6ahIrPIjzeEkDTp77lT PIvaZuEhyNYF
    dkybwJc2MqZ8QV+Fpza7BpSUpJYfg1OeveCZeGzo6yo2unIv IdMeuaibhONz
    KCY+wiicPnuGOJWf8+815uTW1mpVMxH8MrZ7BDdlldcW4Crg leWRL2ke7m7I
    wkSiD1zEnzpCKz9DILmFhb7uxjA9++DBZs6CbrsNkXd8s5Dt ae71NREvJZsr
    fT6U6vrvzocPXARNeXgUVtmIX70h9evgN80ks0UPnj7xAoGa Nq9Uf3VdVPfu
    Q+9+rbrBvX5+GFH+3DD8yruq5M1um9mtbvguxgxFwc8VA5Tj zFq6jl+QjPaT
    v9p5ICjktfq9iWdti3AzdLrhQ9na2gxWzdYYnI9onW6+l8uv dqlY005/xf8m
    hkRvJFMzn6lpMjVspgYyNfKZGiZTaDOFyBTmM4UmU91mqiNT PZ+pbjJpwNn/
    ZzXPooJPE09DH8cMDWid7vCAPj066EmdpOf8G1kgcruu+ysG wzi9GsOJkOd+
    K6j87fUbSSAkPYFbRbleeTnnPemGYvrj5mdGKMd2D5zZlVxw E4D9r2QBbfOa
    cY8Z7RxHOOAV4nz4gZBGrEB0eRl9YizxIRmGi1Mpcjz9LcCL gKvUME3HyWSc
    BbW2TiUukzEczuhuKxN23PVffl+N2yDBncIlG82U0Uw8ptPj ffFU1BO0IIsa
    CkcLwjtqwUhqYU8cKR8x54CUWG4ELAg6OSJcRy8vkgvsZDTl axwinBPRDy1u
    aeuxY5Az2eeTrozLzKe6kg4DGDVUqKUw9LWDZMpiPx7KX4yK GdpmN6E9SVPY
    TfeWzk0Eb4KHPW777i+EU9tosy1/Wm+zwbAA6uisPxH++Aq+ XEoAZnvsCC7f
    KN0m6BolZNDflxfeOiOHxkOUifvp78UxBcZJd93bHWUO+FSy +UFUJ6YbNMvN
    zWGMvVfY6oMTuCXIaJHVSUbeyQjFTflkzUlJXyUO5bcllchF hXNccOTDExSC
    m9CSpd/dObPtg+O93YrgcwUzgCxeMp5A9wQm96un1bxMZUrU q+VylXmtGzYz
    LmuSW1VPvjJpzWomY5mkRrUgZ7n0P7msJV23sIku3piSu8yJ BozCd5uCgb2Z
    yPWvFbnsFwWLMd2q//RajEm4sACBy7B7JKCvXQj0R4bwlApg v82c9c78/5bs
    /z77Zvu/6/VWc7m4/1tKzPZ/f4vf9/10gP3BnU6ew3fOOo6z lr2bK0ik5tCQ
    iolTfNuKpJ7boJsk4ALDV9GpkHibTJz3/VMQW4qnwkV+KSQp COPdY+4/aP4b
    36ff3v9PvbXSDov+f5bl32z+fzP/P9vBYNjrfXI+NaEsvksm E/UF2guoFPEU
    wJTfWzr4+Xl38c3rl+qieekehxecz5u8xx3jnrHgc2f8aUzs VBjJ+Z1Oepj2
    tNuTGpoi40Te8+BXME9NzjocV1eb83a+f5/7KF/mKy4wBkN1 1mOIo0B5MA8n
    wfrBedXtf0wm20c/GNcU1IykBR1MNHXCTfNu1F/C8QyR3QRI 5+Bt52jv1W5H
    ym3w3fk4GqdL0bu+lbuztHFq1Xror6wnD5cBzvbb4xe14FHU N+fSjEI7r1UK
    0kiEd+iwZeqrzftwvO25hVaNt+J/HsdL5+eD9WAebm7np9Va 0wmHxilysScM
    7e4ZK4XaXKRJNb3FcdYWYPaWrFtlv6uOjt+83TnuHL74+9H+ zvZBppIonGcG
    iLbfA8HkzuAKceB5LyWNmSHfhwiGYL4iXdmrPuO5RdoabBft GLeY5qSkbahp
    irES8EEND15Pq38L19BiBU94PV0amBwL6FJvIA/MF04e9k6z r9ie00OOJmvw
    fDh8H/ysB7bWg8DW66ZPxpK9Y853lQA6liFYVyvcfQBhxPJQ XvYHwRvBKAPk
    LigX/UEHHnLzQHZhkTvq/889qwJv2p2xZM9D0V7MWnQHFEWd 6RYd05nFoTCH
    e4Gh74sO3IvnwbwSnGSNxvcCMygba63KbiICzeTT+j2r0tPs hb4RwiZM0YG6
    q2+YvRzU853tdf/g2114043y5Y/oFOdIbVso//3HWwHQiU7H c4nhIO0JH8vg
    3A1JOMJdcA7qXwSnc27smgsLlvr8dgPddMcobyacII7OzXwJ ddx5ffj3N/s/
    vjjeyOf0iWCdBPCe9M9nJgXql536PGL97mAvLvt6sHN4dLz5 UD775uX+5sPv
    6w3bmVmFuyOajr2Uy4t+Oce5w6VB5s7giQmYwB6zfDTqBlsB /XS4t9G1WVvN
    Dqjru+yAevBZbl+9fvX84PXOT+78u+R/Zu3TttlXA+sWWh0g XPdMUIvKw3F1
    SdtN4H7fhabvjERhjnb7rFWPnOeQ5v4HwJ38z7gb/wrp/075 P2y2pvx/NlZm
    8v//ofyvPuonl/3ERNnxY7I89kP23Cj3T4v9f3qpv1zo92R+ zxcQSMkdOsAt
    ?/bx9sL+7fbzXAaqZDKJ2WD2oT8daNyg8eYZ6q9+L2a9A/zWq0 L+EAdzh/3ml
    1WgW6X9rZWb//Yb03w6+WVne+xghQppjB+MzjcKiEb2GKYko fHMoIZ1yGl3Z
    qar7DxOX5HjJhiYJnkVMmlz/RYAtDZLJFooeJUlwNpmM1p8+ RZiPy1F/Keld
    Pf3nNUpFT0naF0GRUhtqhrZK6wEkeBExolwUD68mcObhux0J nvXw9JfxqC83
    IkVebAXjK7A3GVJ8vD/JxT+Dp2khUrkOEKJYjP9Ft9nDi9EV 3FG7rTJTHBHZ
    9lP5oAlGwpwIKzGKBDDi1uD775LJOB9AjJEonjCy2Bg5UAM6 TdHoLXl4ERa6
    h7DTWaAoW4mCg+fbVQ28438kF9NLd/hYcFLA1vqvKGaNgH7d aoFus9GgTpfj
    SRDWzY4bQY0++xRbb8hYGJ8EUTk+nA3NR+Eb5bKPeBqMyWVC Qy19oafu29xs
    IwbcFzjevtPqh2R6K59Ohkhwr8xOivizmjznswggIsBwW8eO DYpwEtZPC/Eg
    EOxhOqkxnbRzlnTfbyjA3f64+xP2rAGcF4vB+gzmmg3xpuMC MlQ0QoPuM0Gq
    U+f6GyWSR1jXXaC+yv6w3vjbPGWw85O1xb5x0Jqq70fvm1h/ 8r9md7Xc+LH2
    jd/iRsDip/xvpUIg/siPFT6lTlozktUhRbrPBzfxuWdtFeDk YxjopVg3ddpW
    lVWv2bD1g9DnBQSpZXgkYprFCOdv2GzwsulLcS3QT2KX1+Zm ZnnNcKW/4Vti
    dymlOoN1sGhiW9n8dsdWzg4bFvaAOeD0NTdXhP7B2Tt8w7ia OfICp7XgGFQ3
    9ht1Tg0ZtuYtNBaMOsY7tfz1ko9wvkgrz7jEtrO7f7Tz097f 4U+Q9k0BZgVk
    /JN0I3Rnr6+j86uEAji9J27cbfYZ32n2QRsxWLeae4LK/Juk m0gvZgXWf5mw
    hOIQmkusw80z1Q+CQs3NW0XJwrsTvjoNfjUIyu3sSHrYrp7e 8JWwnkHMqUGY
    UvQlWPoNqhgPHnhtszggo1XuDvOvb6CHfX7dkX59tSP/d6Sb pX/ry62WHQYU
    fqbOEV1X08VhV/pZ5uovDuQv5oPqO/EfZg5Zt729qXoXvWbm ljD4CZYt+4Jz
    Jtir3mKpPIYwUY7oXNmJozKMzyu/pEAO4cuXxY73jw/2OkR6 sxI2eV/AeZsq
    38QCTxx98QKZbcx9Vsl8vGa5acQuP5pgq5nFB+gXcNfg7RRO lpU0DjhFDkUv
    Vx7/MnhMfHQ8YufwJQ2sO4fSkTt6++PLo01DFi3M7ujCf4DJ 2nt+dzGewvLM
    Oegfh+YO5p14PtUXmTfTm3F8Gvz9kPw/ey0X/v77F1fnzvFh JCxgsAgFEBqQ
    qGjSNWdDESwqorctlUWmRU0RT/JJEIuGJopYBDWAcRUxVSLw k/MgD7EY3LZ7
    llwk1SWoCdKyOXwQWYJKbjieSGflpBr1uY0mL25x/Q49CZ0R FWas0EudxkGF
    bdAggWMG05XM2PJJt825cf1xf3fdGw88B25CLW5Zg5WxcOmH DW68eH10rFB2
    XmwfHOy9+nEPuczG9JKPCc0L/Y8dvNXAtIhfso7x8qRX/fj7 JW5jCmwJiyHc
    7F4iFfqlzJb6QqWBiJ0ftvcP3r7Z88WoxT1a7Kz/+0Ip24J7 NtRlQ2tvkesf
    ZHoJpVJ89WzcXXLy/UZJbzl9wu+yTMlwIEu6LQtH50LHFSTa xu0DLSPYyDU9
    h34Mm5xDsxIUuatLpvpAsvnd5HcJP42vQkr+Hf3CA/BAA8BB U2rBeTIJpMdN
    hFhOIfVJPz3q+e4pa1+72DxiqKpVm9Q2qZfc2DQYGxrFGaLF /qjWeC7bHW0e
    IqCxCF/9niniEQa3gWBq/vxWpkf4czUnYJGROQnrBrHKXy++ 7o0zQevyuqaL
    OzUjOs2VG+kDa6W3bwEm9x4JVbsi6a1PSmfuD/oYCoRsxoLE Je5kcEgq0Ykc
    bV1i2gxCVEqtALzBHWJH6HuuJyws8CHPCN/4ULEhZmlpSUQw 07ySBQafgk+v
    LnB3DityyxKDelO/9t2SO6/ir55u1+zoR7CcKW7dvcpRVpHb 1jlUd2VVTB9u
    Bq1834joA4aOkL/4SkFMWLxp6cajKgU62zcjewSCxR5HcGvM OIwnqmJ5MvCo
    Or3ENF2wVIIxVcOnfkw8yq17Dr/kgzcVv/WzVqnIBmQja3YG TZogtMFW5Kah
    uqETimDu0w/g99qGr/ruFIi7vsmKssTXDHOu4FcM81e3cRrO vRqaG5Evbu10
    6XuOaOPrkLpQ8r5D2fh9WOtB0C8GleTjiEE9qzeRFy5dW+rn CZN7R8fbzw/2
    j17s7ebMbbBQ5/yiu3a5aBFl4IxsWgRVooZYeHP2aKony2WG x43p1wvtmhE6
    TAY/sPBNkqGzdWYcy9gMjpIx3ehPWQ2UElP8URNsmXkqM5d6 NoCcRFNkyWQV
    DEMi4HzDDYZfDTY01mSQbadrfmvQzLLnchY/l5Nl7CmTH/af v9w+dPsm9DEI
    7VrEnEZZmpx1JsOOVKaihqORt4GLlfQVZi90yOiuaCnAiOth zPWm9RKluTAn
    tHoyjhCxGGcuD445bSMUtdZLAqUUjwiXhOigreruPWz+JpGN rEdsTKb6VOdE
    XZnJjRtONpvAWrr2i1VSgN0KTtSigmE4tZMaYVICF+yluP/k C7afTO8+0b70
    dpZMBa6RRshYmvBz2kAfR6QSDc4AF5vK8nFfeHb9xD5C9i8O lTL7zX6z3+w3
    +81+s9/sN/vNfrPf7Df7zX6z3+w3+81+s9/sN/vNfrPf7Df7 zX6z3+z3p/79
    L+nnq8UA8AAA
    ====

  46. Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 4
    Not much more to say than what's in the title.

    Once the jinni gets out of the bottle, it's damned hard to get it back in. Lawsuits might harass individuals, but it won't stop the momentum.

    The only way I can see this thing being stopped is for a "DVD2" to come out and for "the industry" to obsolete all DVD currently on the market, and if that happened, I'd bet the consumers would raise bloody hell over it. ESPECIALLY considering how long everyone waited to get the freaking DVD standard in the first place.

    -=-=-=-=-

    --

    -=-=-=-=-
    My mom's going to kick you in the face!

    1. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, why not just backup the 5gig files to DAT tape, then you can store 5 movies per tiny tape?

      Or , re-encode the mpeg2 streams to MPEG4 format, you get full resolution (720x288 for widescreen) and it looks 95% like the original.

      Its not VHS, its SAME quality as DVD.

      As for extras and menus, big deal, the menus are so crap and simple why waste the data... you can duplicate them anyway by using html+jpegs and links.

      Anyway, going on the storage curve law, things will get so high by 2002, then we can store 50 DVD movies on one disc. Things arent gona be 650 meg for ever.

    2. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Alpha+Prime · · Score: 1

      Having it in software only expedited the process since the hardware is so hard to hack for most people. I have a friend who loves to break the dongle security. Its easy enough if you have the proper hardware and the knowlege.

      ...Alpha

    3. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most movies are 4gigs not 9, the extra gigs are making of or trailers, or music videos.

      Topgun was 3.8gig

      Another use for COPYING dvds to HD is for people who want a 1 day rental to last 1 week.

      Borrow for one day, copy it to HD (5gigs) and you can watch it for 1 week or more, or ifyou have a 30g HD, you could keep upto 8 movies backedup.

      And YES, you can play the movies from HD with full menus etc and FULL 5.1 audio , for those who say you cant, get a clue, make a video_ts dir in C:\ and copy the files there, then the player (xing) will play from there.

      :P~~


    4. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by kijiki · · Score: 1

      Go get a good debugger. Now think: The software decoder has to decrypt it's key into memory to use it. It wouldn't have mattered if Xing had encrypted their key, it just would have take a bit longer. Even if someone figures out how to make software that confuses every known debugger out there, you can still run the decoder in an emulator like BOCHS and get the key that way. The only way to securely distribute digital media would require tamper-proof hardware (impossible) or authentication schemes like DIVX (annoying, and probably still not secure).

    5. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Foogle · · Score: 1
      Well that's not the point. The point is that in the business world, someone always has to be accountable. That's why businesses want a commercially supported Operating system, and why people like RedHat can charge for support. It's the reassurance that there's someone to blame when all hell breaks loose.

      And that's what they're doing now -- blaming the hackers who broke the code.

      -----------

      "You can't shake the Devil's hand and say you're only kidding."

    6. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by WNight · · Score: 1

      But, they feared making it open because their bugs would be obvious. So they hid it hoping that nobody would look.

      Even if it was open, they wouldn't have gotten any serious help. As Bruce Schneier says, nobody will waste their time helping test a proprietary scheme.

      And if any hackers found bugs, they'd simply have waited until the system was finalized before pointing them out.

      Even doing this in hardware would only have bought them a little time. Smart cards, designed to be uncrackable even with determined hardware hackers with millions of dollars at stake are proving to be fairly 'easy' to crack. And because the codes pretty well had to be static, you'd only need to crack one...

      As was said in a previous message, no matter how strong it was, or how well protected, it would eventually be cracked because we can just watch it be done. Crypto relies on the premise that you can en/decrypt the message in a 'safe' place. PGP assumes that your PC is trojan free, or your super-safe messages could simply be screen-dumped. The same with DVD hardware... we could take it apart piece by piece, melting open the chips until we could apply hardware probes on critical gates and watch the execution.

      If you make it harder, you only attract smarter hackers.

      But, that would be overkill. Someone would get fired from a hardware company and would have given away the key. Nothing like this is ever secure for long.

    7. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by WNight · · Score: 1

      Nope. If all they wanted was to watch pirated movies, they'd download the VCD versions. Much smaller, and almost as good.

      And bigtime DVD pirates don't care about this. They just presses duplicates of the disc with encryption intact.

      The only people this helps are people who want to watch DVDs they already own on alternate platforms. (Or people who'd rather download a 9GB movie instead of a 650MB movie, then burn it onto 12 CDs and flip discs all the time... yeah, like that's a big group of people.)

      Cracking the encryption doesn't mean as far as piracy goes until a 9GB download and 9GBs of drive space are so cheap as to not matter. Until then, it just lets us watch the movies we own the right to view. (That bit about the region coded has no legal force, so fuckem.)

    8. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Ledge+Kindred · · Score: 2
      The point is that in the business world, someone always has to be accountable. .... It's the reassurance that there's someone to blame when all hell breaks loose. .... And that's what they're doing now -- blaming the hackers who broke the code.

      Right, instead of blaming themselves for developing such a lousy encryption scheme and not putting it ou for public comment to find out if it's lousy or not, they're saying, "We designed a lousy encryption scheme and kept it private but now these people have disclosed that it was a lousy encryption scheme therefore we must sue them rather than take the blame."

      That whole "accountability" thing is a sham in the industry. No corporation, whether you want to talk about Sony, Microsoft, IBM, Ford, probably not even RedHat now that they have stockholders to be responsible to, nobody will take responsbility for doing something stupid or "wrong" if they can instead sue some poor schmoe in attempt to pass the buck.

      -=-=-=-=-

      --

      -=-=-=-=-
      My mom's going to kick you in the face!

    9. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by AT · · Score: 1

      The people who cracked the encryption aren't the ones who should be blamed. All they did is point out the problems that already existed. And of course, the only value is punitive, to discourage others from posting the code, which as the original poster pointed out, is futile. The "jinni" is out.

      If anyone should be blamed, it is:

      (1) Xing. They didn't encrypt their key, as they should have.

      (2) The designers of the DVD encryption scheme. They made a huge mistake in allowing one comprimised key to reveal other keys. Now it is impossible to just lock out the Xing key.

    10. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by skelly · · Score: 1

      I really do not see what all the fuss is about in the first place. If the DVD consortium had bothered to create open source drivers for LINUX and *BSD then the crack would not have been necessary. They haven't even broken any copyrights anyway since they haven't released dvd movies on the internet. All they did was open source the means to write drivers and indirectly how to read the encryption to to run those drivers. The actual hardware requirements for burning DVD is costly and copying to CD loses all the advantages of DVD. All you get is a lousy VHS quality and that is bad. If you want pirated VHS movies, they are already on the net. Any idiot with a T1 and a video graphics card can copy movies. Also the space reqirements for dvd are in the gigabytes. CD's only hold 650 MB of information. You will loose a lot of quality in the compression to CD. The worst that they may have done was infringe on some patents and copyrights. The harware makers are just lashing out from their own stupidity for such lousy encryption schemes. Oh well, I just want to watch my DVD movies in my home player and maybe play DVD released software on my computer. I could give a shit about stealing a copy of of a movie when I can rent it for four bucks and buy it for 15 bucks.

      --
      Romanes eunt domus? People called Romanes, they go the 'ouse? It says Romans go home. No it doesn't. What's Latin fo
    11. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      No offense but the issue of public review of the CSS encryption methodology is irrelevant. It doesn't matter if they came up with an unbreakable encryption. Why you ask? Because the players have to have the ability to decrypt the information to playback the movies. Which means the keys are available, either built into the players or included on the discs themselves. Once the DVD consortium was stupid enough to allow software DVD players they lost any chance of keeping this secret. It doesn't matter if you try to disguise, hide, obfuscate, etc. the decoder. If it's there, it can be reverse engineered and there's nothing that can be done about it. They should have stuck to hardware.

      To repeat: this is not an "openness" issue. Peer review wouldn't have resulted in better functionality.

      -sw

    12. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      DVDs have a couple layers of protection. First DVD devices will not read arbitrary blocks off the disks until they have been properly frobbed to allow this. This is the unlock key. Then the data is encrypted so that you can't steal the data directly and have a perfect to the original copy of the movie. If they would have stuck with hardware implementation only, this would have been much more difficult to accomplish. Plus they could have applied for patents and such which would give them legal grounds to hunt down people who do reverse engineer the methodology anyway.

      -sw

    13. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree. I haven't heard of any way of encrypting a decryption key so that one program can it can be used w/out decrypting the first key. I'm somewhat confused by the idea of stacking encryption keys and assuming that makes it safe. Wouldn't decompiling the program and probing through it let you put together the algorithm to use it anyway? If you encode something in such a way to allow you to decode it without lossing any information then of course someone else can do the same. It's just common sense. Why bother with this encryption shit anyway? It sounds like a waste of effort to me.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    14. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Oirad · · Score: 1

      I'd bet the consumers would raise bloody hell over it. ESPECIALLY considering how long everyone waited to get the freaking DVD standard in the first place.

      I'd bet the manufacturers would find a way to shift the fire onto "hackers" and such who evily break the encryption scheme, ruining it for everyone else...

    15. Re:Didn't stop MP3, won't stop DVD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (3) Microsoft. They should be blamed for everything.

  47. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copyright laws were designed to strike a balance between the consumer and the creator of a product. Its not fair to the creator for someone to give away thousands of copies of his product so that the creator makes no money, but it is also unfair to the buyer to be foreced to only use the product in the way that the creator originaly made it. What this means is that copyright laws allow you to do things like: like make as many copies of a cd as you want, or copy that cd onto another media (like tape), but this is to be for your own personal use and not for resale or distribution (though in some states distribution is not chargeable). Many industries these days are using new media formats to attempt to manipulate how the copyright laws work. Every areticle I have read talks about how this program allows for the "illegal copying" of DVD or the "illegal copying of music to MP3." But these aren't illegal processes, you are merely making a copy for yourself to another format for backup or easier use. There is nothing wrong with this. Yes, it can be used for illegal purposes, but that does not inherently make the product illegal (hell, you can sell bongs in most states). The long and the short of it is that these encryption techniques (etc.) while trying stop illegal copyright violations is also stopping the consumers legal rights granted to us by copyright laws. And now we see how bad this is, the common citizen looss their legal right and the illegal activities will not stop because the incription formats will never be good enough.

  48. Monopolies crumbling by ~spot · · Score: 1

    Its sad that these big companies are having to throw around high priced lawsuits to hide the fact that they got caught with their pants down. They should have anticipated the need for DVD software on the linux platform, but instead they chose to leave it out, instantly making it a target for geeks, hackers, and coders everywhere.


    Whoever brought the suit up should be ashamed of themselves.


    ~spot

    --
    "and no, im not the spot working for Transmeta, although i wish i was..." -- ~spot "i'm the epitome of public enemy..."
  49. illegal? by Kanasta · · Score: 1

    They stumbled across 4 bytes that Xing left lying around. They put it thru a DVD and found it worked. How is that illegal?

    1. Re:illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's illegal because I (a private company) said so. Even if there aren't any laws against it, if you decide otherwise, I'll sue until you agree.

  50. Re:All for one and one for all. [fair use] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not just look after your discs? I've never managed to destroy a CD (or DVD or Dreacast GD).

  51. Re:THIS IS GREAT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you hate Tovralds, then you are either stupid or you are bill gates(Notice the lowercase and that Notice gets a capital letter). As far as ripperX goes, I LOVE IT and no I do not distribute mp3s. I have at least 350 cds and about 400 mp3s. Now lets see if you can figure out if that is less mp3s than songs on the cds I have. I have 4 cd players but they are not always convient. When I'm in my car or just in my room, I will listen to the cds. However, if I'm on my computer doing work, it's much easier to play mp3s and change songs with a mp3 player than it is to use cds. All you bitches to is bitch and makeup bullshit lies. You sound like a dumbass that is concerned with nothing but ripping people off. No, I'm not a programer even though I can. I'm a Physicist working on my PHD so you can take it from my side too. Everyone that bitches about linux are the dumbasses that probably jumped on the management train durning college becaues their initial major was to hard and required to much work on their part. LAZY! Get a life!

  52. Re:RULES ARE MADE TO BE BROKEN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are forgetting one very important thing. Rules were made to be broken. Microsoft allready taught the WHOLE WORLD how to do this. And HEWL YEAH if i can have something for FREE why the hell should i go pay $$$$$ for it? Some of use cannot afford to pay MS taxes everytime they brake their protocols , and everytime they release a patch to their lousy OS.SO we use a FREE BETTER product. Free software is here to stay. End of story. PERIOD. IN the long run everyone will see that.The "rules" as you call them are changing very rapidly and radically. Wake up and smell the coffe....

  53. Re:GOOD! by tjrw · · Score: 1

    "It would have cost us, the consumer, more money if they had decided to release 128 bit encrypted titles in the US and 40-bit encrypted titles to the rest of the world. That's two smaller runs rather than one larger run. Sure you can yell about the export laws but they're a different subject."

    Umm, hello !
    Can you say region codes ?

    They already do have to do multiple different runs because the morons don't want your to view a US film in e.g. the UK due to the different release schedules in the cinemas. It doesn't seem to have occurred to them that it's not hard to run an NTSC TV and a US DVD player in the UK. Of course most people don't do that since lots of places sell "region free" players with modified firmware allowing people to view region 1 DVDs elsewhere anyway.

  54. Macrovision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >I'm not sure I understand why they (the entertainment industry) has their shorts all in a bundle over this. Surely they new that at least some people would be knock off DVDs via a redigitalization of the analog signal? Sure, it isn't as high quality and the seconday channels are lost, but aren't they already subject to piracy galore with VCRs? And yet they make money hand over fist on VCR rentals and sales. I am fully capable of copying videos at home, and yet most of my videotapes are purchased, pre-recorded videos.

    You won't get far without some kind of macrovision defeat. Difficult to find (unless you like to build electronics kits), and usually illegal (no, stripping macrovision isn't illegal, using one of the patented methods is.). Commercial boxes aren't cheap.

    Although, I 100% agree with you, $20 or so is my limit for software that doesn't do EVERYTHING I need it to do, PERFECTLY.

    I've actually found DVD's relatively reasonably priced, here, in Canada (although boxed sets are much too overpriced). And, cheaper (yes, cheaper!) to rent. Just $1 CAN a night at Steve's TV. I bought the matrix for $24.

    I didn't buy DVD for the picture, I bought it for the dolby digital surround sound. That was worth it. It makes a crappy signal seem like film ;-P

    If you want to be really lame, you could always sync a camera to the CRT refresh, and record the picture on the CRT itself, as if you were watching it. This can never, ever, be defeated.

    BTW: DVD isn't (technically) going to look a whole lot better on HDTV. It doesn't have enough resolution lines to make use of it... Buuut, the increased width of the display will allow for a few more scanlines. Not enough to make a big deal over though. I think it will look better though, due to tube/flat screen/lcd/etc.. technology advances giving a sharper image. Not due to the HDTV standard, though.

    Overall, your arguments are good... Too much Intellectual Property is sold at too high a price nowadays. Like the CAD software at my College: $10,000 per copy. For a large company, at that price, why not just hire a team of programmers to make you a custom solution?

    1. Re:Macrovision by MacBoy · · Score: 1
      BTW: DVD isn't (technically) going to look a whole lot better on HDTV. It doesn't have enough resolution lines to make use of it... Buuut, the increased width of the display will allow for a few more scanlines. Not enough to make a big deal over though. I think it will look better though, due to tube/flat screen/lcd/etc.. technology advances giving a sharper image. Not due to the HDTV standard, though.
      Yes, it will look better in a HDTV set. Most HDTV sets will double the number of scanlines of the NTSC signal, resulting in a less flickery picture without noticable scanlines. And if you buy a DVD player with progressive component video outputs, then it will look superb, without the interlacing effects ("combing") and "jutter" caused by converting a 24 frame/sec signal to 60 field/sec.
  55. Re:I'm not sure I understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On our Panasonic A-120:

    - S-Video
    - Composite
    - ColorStream

    No RF. I guess they figure if you can afford the player your TV doesn't suck. Only coax/optical digital Audio output.

    Some lame-ass DVD players, including (I think) mine, won't even play a region 1 PAL disc (does this exist?) in an NTSC region 1 player, and vice versa.

  56. Re:All for one and one for all. [fair use] by Panaflex · · Score: 1

    I can't tell you how many copies of CD's I go through. Tapes as well. So, I got a Minidisc, and I copy my CD's to them.

    Whenever the minidisc gets chomped, dropped, boiled.. whatever, I not have my original CD to go and copy back out.

    This is perfectly legal. I won't switch to DVD until I can get my fair use out of it. And, just like my CD->MD conversion, I expect perfect quality, digital.

    Pan

    --
    I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
  57. Take the initiative away from the pigs by ccchips · · Score: 1

    I wish I could bell the cat, but I'm afraid I have neither the time nor the expertise; however, I have an idea.

    What if people who are into these things got together and established a freely-available technology akin to DVD? What if they then made the encryption/decryption technology part of the hardware, or gave the proprietary-content people a way to plug in security at the hardware level? If that happened, we'd have a situation where (as always preferable,) people would have a *choice* about how to encode, or whether to encode, security information into their content.

    I think media-to-eye paths should be viewed just like any other communication path. Satellite television and cable television are not, in themselves, proprietary routes for information. It's the responsibility of the indivitual cable companies and providers to scramble/descramble their transmissions. This has *nothing* to do with the particular television set we use, because the set is a standard device that responds to standard signals.

    There will always be greedy people to fight these kinds of things, either for their own pocket or their own expediency. But, ultimately, there's no long-term advantage for that.

    If DVD is cracked, it's cracked. Punishing the people who did it isn't going to stop future crackers, but it *will* give those of us who already distrust the mass-media industry a bad taste that can only get worse. Look at what's gone on with MP3. There could be an ever-widening gorge between the mass-media producers and those they are supposed to serve.

    Unless we can come up with an alternative that everyone can live with.

    What say? Is it worthwhile? Or should we just continue fighting with each other, and see where the war gets us?

    --
    --------------Rev. C.C.Chips---------------- For the real truth, visit
    1. Re:Take the initiative away from the pigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually the dxr2 is 100% hardware but the dxr3 isn't and has to use software for the CSS.

  58. Re:Only one thing to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would that closed source player be 100% linux compatible? Do you think there are many closed-source companies willing to develop binaries for:

    - Atari
    - Amiga
    - Macintrash
    - Etc...

    Linux is about compatibility. Closed source breaks this...

    And when the money for this player runs out, and Linux 3.0.0 or XFree 5.9 won't run the last player release, what then? Pump in more money? Break linux to make a closed source program work?

  59. "I am Spartacus!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Unfortunately, many of us aren't willing to risk the financial well-being of out wife and kids just for our principles. If that means the loss of my own soul to the evil, then so be it. I did it to save three other souls.

    "I use windows at work, so my kids won't ever have to use it."

  60. open source and freedom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like open source and computing are approaching a nexus similar to that of the people vs. tyranny.

    let's all meet in the usa, dress up like indians, board a container ship full of dvd's, and throw them overboard.

    it's starting to look like programmers are destined to be the next freedom fighters -- with a personal obligation not to the gov or law but to freedom and knowledge, even when it threatens their freedom.

    RMS was right -- Free Software is starting to resemble Free Speech.

    1. Re:open source and freedom by Zerth · · Score: 1

      > let's all meet in the usa, dress up like indians, board a container ship full of dvd's, and throw them
      > overboard.


      Nah, we need to show up at somebody's front door/steps, dressed like PHBs, and ritualisticly burn DVDs.

  61. Re:Uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhhh, but the conversion is going to take even longer than real-time playing...

    Imagine this:

    30 minutes ripping time + 5 or 6 hours MPEG-2 decoding time for a 2 hour movie, on, say, a Pentium 200 + 18 to 24 hours MPEG-1 encoding time. Don't even think about re-encoding it into a lower-resolution MPEG-2 stream. That would take weeks.

    Now, not only did it take you longer to convert it than it took to rent the VHS tape, but it looks like sh*t (worse than VHS). 320x244, all pixellated whenever anything happens, YUCK! And a very nastily compressed soundtrack to boot! The power comany would love you, though.

    Of course, if you have 100's of GB to spare, I guess AVI is a choice, but a P-200 wouldn't handle the necessary data throughput (IMHO).

    In other words, if it can't play DVD realtime, it may as well not bother.

  62. Link to Copyright Designs & Patents Act 1988 by JPMH · · Score: 2
    Full text of the act is available at http://www.ipr-helpdesk.org/en/p /uk/p_uk_051a9.htm.

    Devices designed to circumvent copy-protection

    296

    (1) This section applies where copies of a copyright work are issued to the public, by or with the licence of the copyright owner, in an electronic form which is copy-protected.

    (2) The person issuing the copies to the public has the same rights against a person who, knowing or having reason to believe that it will be used to make infringing copies

    (a) makes, imports, sells or lets for hire, offers or exposes for sale or hire, or advertises for sale or hire, any device or means specifically designed or adapted to circumvent the form of copy-protection employed, or

    (b) publishes information intended to enable or assist persons to circumvent that form of copy-protection, as a copyright owner has in respect of an infringement of copyright.

  63. Question???? by Duxup · · Score: 1

    In an article or two I read that it was Xing who forgot to secure their software and then using that they were able to crack the encryption. If that is the case I don't see how you can blame the guy who wrote the DVD-CSS decryption routines, even if they were weak.
    Is this not the case?

    And lets say it is the programmer's fault. How do you legally define good and bad DVD-CSS decryption routines?

    I can't imagine a contract stating: "If nobody cracks it, then your ok, if they do, we sue you."

    Or perhaps that's how it is?

    1. Re:Question???? by Duxup · · Score: 1

      gord did i have that backwards!
      hehe,next time i'll read the article completely :-)

  64. Re:GOOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello! The Region code makes a region 1 disc different than a region 2 disc. ie. Different data. Different data will require a different disc pressing.

    You said:

    >It would have cost us, the consumer, more money if they had decided to release 128 bit encrypted titles in the US and 40-bit encrypted titles to the rest of the world. That's two smaller runs rather than one larger run.

    Pressing multiple region coded discs means many smaller runs (much more than 2, actually. I beleive there are at least 5 regions.).

    BTW: Region 1 = US and Canada only. Where is 128-bit ok? US and Canada only. ie: Your point is moot. Multiple pressing are currently required, in exactly the same fashion (but for a different reason) as you suggest is why 40-bit would be chosen over 128-bit. A 128-bit Region 1 disc could very much have been legally made and sold in the only regions it supports.

  65. Re:Decryption routines.. by Musc · · Score: 1

    It isn't the fact that they are making a profit that is a bad thing, it is the way in which they are going about it. Making everything unnecessarily expensive and unfree. make your damned money back selling dvd hardware. no need for stupid encryption schemes to guarantee inflated prices.

    --
    Hamsters are at least as feathery as penguins. HamLix
  66. Re:A lot of issues - reverse engineering and so on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no starwars trilogys on dvd without it? AWHHH. Well the dvd starswars trilogy might as well be nonexistant if we can't use use dvd in linux. Not all of us can buy expensive dvd players for the tv, a computer that runs windows so we can watch dvd, etc.......... That's a selfish outlook.

  67. Re:DVD Forum Are you listening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And us PowerPC/Alpha/Sparc guys are chopped liver?

    Seriously, we all want to create a royality-free gpl'd version of a dvd player -- we just now need to clean room this decss program, and be able to use it under the GPL'd.

    DVD Movies are good. Why limit it to a lame platform like Linux x86?

  68. Re:Bully Tactics by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Legal systems exist to provide persons with an official way to address problems.

    This is NOT the type of thing that should be clogging the courts.

    This isn't like having the FBI bust up Vinny Bagadonuts' DVD piracy ring.

    This is simple bullying. If I independantly developed a recipe for cookies that tasted EXACTLY Wally Amos' cookies, AND if that recipe is different from the "Famous" recipe I'd win in court.

    If, I'm selling cookies for $3.00 per dozen at the PTA bake sale and I get hauled into court for "reverse engineering" someones cookie recipe, that's idiotic.

    This is NOT about redress of legitimate concerns. It IS about big money corporations throwing their weight around. When has selling out ever been successful as a vehicle of enacting change?

    The 1960's long haired, pot smoking radicals, have cut their hair and joined the "establishment" and sold out what they believed in because they all of a sudden wanted the nice jobs and nice houses, and 2.3 kids....Now those former revolutionaries are in control of the same system that they railed against 30-40 years ago and it's "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss."

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  69. Re:DVD Forum Are you listening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And us PowerPC/Alpha/Sparc guys are chopped liver?

    Seriously, we all want to create a royality-free gpl'd version of a dvd player -- we just now need to clean room this decss program, and be able to use it under the GPL'd.

    DVD Movies are good. Why limit it to a lame platform like Linux x86? Thats what binaries do for us. And binaries will break with future kernels and/or libc.

  70. Re:Legal Not an Excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt if lecturing the judge on semiotics is going to do them much good.

  71. Interesting tidbits on Section 296 by technos · · Score: 2

    Thanks to Pekka Pietikainen, who found this little goodie.

    296 Devices designed to circumvent copy-protection

    (1) This section applies where copies of a copyright work are issued to the public, by or with the licence of the copyright owner, in an electronic form which is copy-protected.

    (2) The person issuing the copies to the public has the same rights against a person who, knowing or having reason to believe that it will be used to make infringing copies-
    (a) makes, imports, sells or lets for hire, offers or exposes for sale or hire, or advertises for sale or hire, any device or means specifically designed or adapted to circumvent the form of copy-protection employed, or
    (b) publishes information intended to enable or assist persons to circumvent that form of copy-protection, as a copyright owner has in respect of an infringement of copyright.

    [(2A) Where the copies being issued to the public as mentioned in subsection (1) are copies of a computer program, subsection (2) applies as if for the words "or advertises for sale or hire" there were substituted "advertises for sale or hire or possesses in the course of a business.]

    (3) Further, he has the same rights under section 99 or 100 (delivery up or seizure of certain articles) in relation to any such device or means which a person has in his possession, custody or control with the intention that it should be used to make infringing copies of copyright works, as a copyright owner has in relation to an infringing copy.

    (4) References in this section to copy-protection include any device or means intended to prevent or restrict copying of a work or to impair the quality of copies made.

    (5) Expressions used in this section which are defined for the purposes of Part I of this Act (copyright) have the same meaning as in that Part.

    (6) The following provisions apply in relation to proceedings under this section as in relation to proceedings under Part I (copyright)-(a) sections 104 to 106 of this Act (presumptions as to certain matters relating to copyright), and (b) section 72 of the Supreme Court Act 1981, section 15of the Law Reform

    (Miscellaneous Provisions)
    (Scotland) Act 1985 and section 94A of the Judicature
    (Northern Ireland) Act 1978 (withdrawal of privilege against self-incrimination in certain proceedings relating to intellectual property);
    and section 114 of this Act applies, with the necessary modifications, in relation to the disposal of anything delivered up or seized by virtue of subsection (3) above.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
    1. Re:Interesting tidbits on Section 296 by pp · · Score: 1

      Oh, and this is UK law apparently
      (and looking at his e-mail address the guy in trouble is in the UK)

      I really hope this doesn't end in some poor invidual being sued for everything he owns
      by that multi-billion DVD cabal (who thinks MS is
      too small to join them)

  72. Re:What's the big deal? Piracy costs industry zero by Cramer · · Score: 1

    > i can't declare it as a loss on my financial reports (yes, i am a corporation) because there's no way to know how many sales were actually lost due to cracks.

    That's an interesting point... if you could get some data on the number of downloads of the crack(s) from the sites distributing them, then you'd be able to file them as losses.

    That would certainly be an inventive tax trick :-) Of course, the people downloading (and using) the crack(s) would not like being tracked like this in the slightest. Then again, the IRS most likely wouldn't accept it if you were ever audited.

    At any rate, making copies of commercial content is bad, immoral, unethical, and illegal. However, people still do it -- speeding is unsafe and illegal, but people still do it all the time. I don't think this is really the point, however. As has been said more times than I care to count, we (the linux dvd community in general) don't want to copy the bloody DVD; we simply want to view the movie for which we've paid our good money. It's not our fault the DVD Forum failed to use a system with any hope of preventing duplication beyond blocking any access at all to the disk. Of course, it's been suggested CSS was never intended to prevent copying, but to prevent "fair-use."

    You can make up your own mind on the legality... there's arguements on all sides. The only reason I bought a DVD was for tinkering and the volume of data a _data_ DVD will hold (I've got way too many CDs as it is.) I hold DVD in the same light as I2O, Diamond, and Creative. [I refuse to do business with Diamond ever as they refused to release any docs on their gfx hardware for years.]

  73. Actually, I've wondered about this myself. by Trifthen · · Score: 2

    Ok, this may all seem obvoius, and if it is, please tell me I'm just being insane. But what in the hell is going on here? Let me get this straight:

    • Anybody with a vcr has been able to copy any movie ever released to the VHS format, yet this industry has not collapsed so far as anyone knows.
    • CD's also fit into the above category, as does most software ever written. So why when they were designing DVD, did they find it in their great wisdom to even need to encrypt the DVD format?
    • If they were really worried about pirates, what about screen captures? What about split data streams? What about capturing the signal from the decoder and saving the raw output to a vcr? What about every other possible way to copy something that can be seen or heard? You simply can't encrypt something of this nature, so why try?
    • Excuse me, but 40bit encryption? 400 keys? Take off a few powers of two for that... effectively 35 bit encryption. I could crack that with a commadore in a back closet. If they thought that would deter anyone who truly wanted to crack the encryption, they were sadly mistaken.

    I could go on for a while, but I see that it's pointless. The fact that they're trying to sue someone for their own neglegence is fairly amusing. But the fact is, they lose absolutely nothing by having the keys cracked. They didn't get anything out of it in the first place - so they can't lose anything.

    Is it just me, or does it seem like the DVD industry was trying to pull a fast one on movie and publishing studios... you know, "Hey, DVD is encrypted... so you'll no longer have to worry about bootlegged copies of your product." Now they have to save face, and it looks like they don't like it one single iota. If this is the case, I wonder how they explained the DVD->VCR and similar copying techniques once the stream is decoded... Oh well, back to the drawing board.

    Shaun Thomas
    Kildosphere.com
    --
    Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
    1. Re:Actually, I've wondered about this myself. by Trifthen · · Score: 1

      I presume that you are refering to copying one tape to another (using two VCR's)? It's not as straight forward as copying using a home VCR due to Macrovision. Macrovision plays with the gain in the VCR, effecting copies but not the TV.

      Yes. However not all tapes use this. I know quite a few people who make copies of movies they buy so they can wear out a cheap tape instead of the original (for stuff they like to watch quite a bit.) What about people who record movies off of something like HBO, Pay Per View, or other formats. You get cable-quality which isn't totally horrible, and all you have to do is pay your cable bill. Doesn't *that* hurt the industry? Since you didn't buy the movie you just recorded? It's irrelevant.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that MPEG-2 is compressed. A straight screen or data stream capture would require huge amounts of storage space and make redistribution tricky. I've also heard that DVD-Video also utilises Macrovision, making copying to tape difficult without some additional equipment.

      I have no idea how MPEG layer 2 compression works, nor do I care. The point isn't that you Can make copies, but that there are certain classifications of people... I propose two:

      • Joe Viewer - Joe doesn't give a damn. He just wants to watch his !%#$% videos that he paid good money for. Getting ahold of pirated copies is a big pain in the keester, and DVD's aren't that expensive anyway, so he buys them without complaint.
      • Bill h4X0R - Bill just wants shit for free. Doesn't care how he gets it, where it comes from, or even what quality it is. So long as it looks good on a TV, he won't complain. He knows the basics for doing cheap video capture. He sometimes does it digitally from a VCR, and the concept is the same from a DVD. Picking a usable compression ratio and converting it to MPEG2, AVI, RealPlayer, Quicktime, etc, he can get a fairly small video that will look crystal clear on any TV. Does encryption stop this man? No. Does Macrovision stop this person? No. Are these formats too big to distribute with a CD? No again.

      My question is this: What do they gain by using encryption? Joe user is damn likely not to pirate videos other than recording stuff off of HBO or whatever. And Bill knows that anything sampled at a fairly decent rate may look bad on a monitor, but will be very forgiving when seen on a TV, and so far as I know, TV has been fine for most people for years. Bill may want an exact copy, but with DVD, that isn't feasable due to storage size limits in DVD recordable media. People make copies of their own movies all the time to avoid wearing out their favorite tapes. What exactly is gained by encrypting this kind of media?

      My answer: absolutely nothing. Good users won't pirate unless to make a copy to avoid wearing something out, which is less prevailent with hard-media. Of course they can't make backups on anything but a VHS in case they scratch or break the disk, but there's always a catch, right? Bad users will do whatever they can to get a movie - including recording it at the theatre, and there isn't any way you can stop that short of metal detectors in the lobby. You've been able to record a CD on to a tape, or another CD for years, and that didn't seem to matter. But as soon as MP3's became all the rage, then the industry started worrying. Why? Because the files can be distributed and anyone can download them? So what. I could have done that with a wave file, mp3 is just better compression. Nothing new has really occoured in the past 5 years to make anyone more paranoid, but for some reason this new technology is making entire industries quake in their boots. What is the big hairy deal, anyway?

      I really don't think it matters. The industry is too paranoid for its own good. Besides that, if they were really serious about this, they would have used a little more common sense when copy protecting DVD's. The playstation did it for crying out loud. Yes Mod chips can get around this, but I can also get around macrovision by putting a mod chip in my VCR or removing the macrovision chip. Very few people go this far, but this only proves that even hardware isn't foolproof.

      Shaun Thomas
      Kildosphere.com
      --
      Read: Rabbit Rue - Free serial nove
  74. What I said on Sunday by heroine · · Score: 2

    When the first article on this came out I posted a comment on how they were probably violating some law. Obviously it was moderated down as a troll but it was true anyways. If there's any law against cracking DVD encryption you can bet the RIAA and MPAA goons are going to hit them with it and with the amount of money these guys can throw at lawyers they'll either put these kids in jail or settle on a $multi-million lawsuit if they ever distribute Livid.

  75. IDIOT! MORON! FATHEAD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you post this from a PC? A true blue IBM PC? A non-clone? Well, if we lived in the world you suggest, there would be no clones, since the IBM PC BIOS would never have been legally duplicated by Compaq back in '84.

    The light bulb was also proprietary. Perhaps no-one should have investigated it after Edison bought the patents. Who the hell needs light bulbs from other companies anyways when you can enjoy the refreshing glow from the light bulb you just plugged into those red hot 0000 AWG DC wires... Damn, the wires fused again! Ma, go over to the neighbours to crank the handle on the proprietary Bell phone (no touch-tone or rotary dial, that would require knowledge of the phone system), the power is out again!

    So was radio. No more FM stereo for you, we'll broadcast at a low quality mono AM station forever, just like Marconi and Tesla did with their proprietary invenetions. Can't do anything better, since we aren't allowed to know how radio works.

    >Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.

    Yeah, what a waste of time it was, newton's laws, etc... Just because he could give people a better understanding of how the world works, doesn't mean he should have.

    If everyone was like you, we'd still have the sun orbiting around us. As proof, I offer this: We would NEVER have known as soon as we did that planets travel elliptical orbits if it weren't for Kepler *STEALING* information from a "colleague". Was that so wrong? I guess so.

    Houston Ground Control, this is Apollo standing by... We have breaking news to report! Mars doesn't seem to be where we predicted it to be, let's study planet orbits!

    Aww, crap. The +5v DC voltage rod from ConEd melted again! My computer is going to crash once my volta pile breaks down (can't have lead acid batteries, volta's pile would have been proprietary, so how it works, no one could ever figure it out to develop it further.)! But the HD is still spinning, I guess +12v DC is avaliable for a little while longer.

    When will you morons get it?

  76. Re:My web page (MODERATE THIS UP!!!!!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not likely, this is slashdot, were informative posts get marked down, and silly crap gets moderated up...

    Isn't self-censorship great? It's like a box of slashdot level 2 posts, you never know what you might read inside!

  77. Re:leaky leaky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the p*ss doesn't kill ya, the chlorine will! ;-)

    (yeah, it's crap, but I felt the urge to hit submit, now!)

  78. Re:GOOD! by mmontour · · Score: 1

    Is the term DVD a protected trademark?

    Probably, but you could always call it "GNU DBD" (for "DBD's Basically DVD") :-)

  79. Re:Flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While that post certainly looks like flamebait, I have a feeling that all the others flaming it are looking a bit silly, now that they've realised:

    This was probably sarcasm! Sounded almost like MEEPT! for a moment there...

    Did you really think this guy was serious about his argument? He's taking you for a ride, and, by the replies to replies to replies, some of you are still on that ride.

  80. Why drug dealers don't sell aspirin... (again) by eries · · Score: 1

    This is 100% correct. MP3 is still thriving, and not (in my opinion anyway) harming the music industry. Priacy only occurs in cases where collusion or some other force damages a free market environment (close-source software is another good example).

    MP3.com ran a terrific article on this a while ago, called "Why drug dealers don't sell aspirin" - here's the URL:

    http://bboard.mp3.com/mp3/ubb/F orum8/HTML/000015.html

  81. Re:Countersue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That reminds me of this:

    Judge: On the docket today, a suit against Mr. X for breaking and entering, and the destruction of personal property. And a countersuit, made by Mr. X that the personal property would never have been destroyed if making entrace to the house was easier. :-)

  82. Bingo! by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 3
    Bruce is absolutely right on about this. THAT is where we should be looking. Who really cares that much about desperately needing to make a spare copy of the Matrix, or desperately needing to play it on a Scrotely Whizzbang in ScroteOS?
    Now ask yourself if you want the ability in the coming millenium to make your own desktop movies, your own music CDs, and be able to go on the net and sell 'em to people on your own without going to CBS or Universal Studios? It doesn't matter that much if you're not good, do you want the _ability_ to express yourself in this way?
    The alternative is exactly what Bruce says, allowing commercial interests acting as trusts to make it difficult for you to be in the business unless you go through one of the established studios- and there's a LOT of evidence that this is sheer exploitation. I'm not sure how bad it is in film, but in the music industry the exploitation is very very bad, insanely so, outright fraudulent. It's brutal.
    The counterbalance to this is ability to produce your own artworks, at several important levels.
    • First, it needs to be legal and possible to do the actual artwork. This would compare to being allowed to own recording equipment at all, if you're a musician. This is tough to lose- it would be tyrannical and indefensible to eliminate it, though you'll see just this happening indirectly- you're taxed on blank media by the industries, supposedly to defend against 'pirates'.
    • Second, it needs to be legal and possible to distribute your artwork. There are some ways to challenge this, though it is tough. This is the level of ability to record your own work on media that is played on industry standard consumer level players, such as CD players. Soon it will be a question of making your own DVD desktop films and being able to give friends your work to play on their consumer DVD players. I _think_ DVD already punishes independents in that you can't do that yet, you have to be a licensee for huge sums or you don't have ability to record that format and play it on a consumer deck. That's bad, very bad, and it must be changed.
    • Third, you need to have the ability to go somewhere and get 1000 CDs/DVDs pressed. Here, CDs have traditionally been strong- there are many small outfits that will burn a case of CDs for you. I think there is a concerted effort going on to make it so no such availability will be there for DVDs. If you have a hit underground rock album and enough grassroots/net distribution to justify pressing them in the thousands, you can do that today. I'm not aware of any way to legally and practically have a hit underground _film_ and press DVDs of it in the thousands, and this is a very serious problem and concern for freedom. We are not talking about pirates here, we are talking about the voice of the artist or independent filmmaker.
    • Finally, you get up to extremely heavy distribution. There may be a problem in getting along with the big entertainment trusts, but if you're playing on those levels you already have your own distribution networks and can cut deals from a position of strength, by shipping X many products and saying 'There. I could move 6X as many with your distribution. You can have a cut of that, or you can sit by and I'll get someone else for it or grow until I'm doing it myself'. At this level the artist does not need that much protection as he or she has _arrived_ and is doing business effectively, with extensive distribution already.
    That's basically 4 levels. Currently, with regard to CD-Roms, the levels to watch out for are second and third- if new consumer CD hardware refuses to play the existing format, it would be suicidal but would also be a way of 'taking back' control of CD authoring from the independents. More significantly, the people who can press 1000 CDs for less than a grand have to be protected- if they are harassed out of business, the independent would have to try releasing their work on blue dye-CDs pressed one at a time, and that doesn't scale. Access to the industrial duplicators _must_ remain.
    With regard to DVDs, it looks like the entire first three levels are at serious risk. I'm not certain you can burn the DVD format at home with your own material: THAT has got to change (rejoicing if I'm wrong here, but I kind of doubt it.). By the same token, if you can't burn it you can't give it to a friend, the datasizes are not comparable to the industry offerings, and if it's made illegal to 'pirate' defined as burn movie content onto a DVD (backing up HDs OK but video content, you're not allowed to?) then level two is shot- if you distribute your own work burned in DVD format you could get done for piracy even though it's your own work. Finally, the third level is the volume producers- if they are stamped out in the name of antipiracy it is an incredible imposition on the independent artist, because without that ability to work hard enough to earn the money to ship the commercial grade content on standard media in volume, nobody is ever going to get to stage 4, the stage of jockeying for position and making room for yourself at the table. To do that you _have_ to be able to move the units yourself and present the big distributors with a fait accompli- giving them an unsolicited tape will not cut it, you have to show them your network and the amount of units you're currently doing.
    Are we going to let the industry BAN us from producing artworks as independents? (insert 'poetic license' joke here! :P ) Are we going to focus so hard on the desire to run off a copy of the Matrix for personal use, that we're _blind_ to the steady erosion of our abilities to create in the digital age? How far will it get before something is done? Who is willing to consider this in terms of the rapidly approaching era of desktop filmmakers (live, CGI, cel-animated, all types) and the systematic slaughter of all of their distribution options?!?
    The _first_ order of business should be getting control of the ability to master consumer DVDs, just as we are able to master audio CDs legally and unharassed. If that means losing the encryption so be it- there are important issues at stake for the millenium. The technology _will_ come, and people _will_ be able to do desktop filmmaking. It's a question of whether the consumer media becomes a wholly controlled property of vast conglomerates, or whether individual artists will be allowed to pursue their artwork using common consumer media for output. You can burn a CD and play it for people (especially if they have a CD-Rom, but maybe even on their CD players.) What if you were only allowed to record on DATs and had to go to Atlantic Records to be allowed to have it made into a CD?
  83. Re:post crack on a foriegn server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about this server? (Check a few posts above!)

  84. Re:Simple Solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I'm Spartacus!"

  85. DVD-ROM drives... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wouldn't be suprised if there was an effort to block any new DVD-ROM drives from being able to read DVD movies. That way when the current batch of DVD-ROM drives die the problem goes away. No more DVD movies on PCs. They could just recall any drives that are not in the hands of consumers to prevent any more from being released.

  86. Re:Down with big business by FigWig · · Score: 1

    Profits don't impede "progress", monopolies do.

    Any company, governement, or whatever will do what they can to stay in power - or stay profitable. Even if this is at the expense of progress. The saving grace to this situation is that there are dozens working in the name of increasing their profits (and thus advancing progress).

    --
    Scuttlemonkey is a troll
  87. Re:GOOD! by um...+Lucas · · Score: 2

    The way you describe it, I don't see a point. They can press all the DVD's at once and then ship them to different areas at different times to correspond to your release codes, and that's once pressing.

    If they have to press one set for the US and then one other set for everywhere but the US regardless of release codes, that's now 2 smaller runs (40 bit & 128 bit) vs. one larger run. The cost of warehousing the DVD's as they're waiting for the release date is negligible.

  88. Re:They may have a case ... sorta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is a patent then the whole thing would be described on the patent server and you dont need to hack it, just read the docs.

  89. Windows first ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the article:

    "He pointed out that the MoRE programmers, who are Windows users, already had what the Linux community wanted-the ability to play DVD movies."

    Hehe ! That hurts, doesn't it ?

  90. blech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ah, security through obscurity. how nice.

  91. Re:Bully Tactics by chuck0 · · Score: 2

    >Every monolithic organization uses the legal system of the country that they're in to bully people when their profits are threatened.

    It's called *capitalism*. This system can't exist without an overwhelming apparatus of lawyers, courts, prisons, police, and so on, all of which function to protect the rich crooks from getting challenged by the little guys/gals.

    How many rich people do you know who are in prison?

    Yup, awfully small list isn't it?

    Chuck0
    Mid-Atlantic Infoshop
    www.infoshop.org

  92. I don't care about the copying- by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

    What I care about is access to tools.
    Give me either access to the ENCRYPTION if there must be encryption, or make the format so you can burn DVDs with unencrypted data, AND THE CONSUMER DECKS WILL PLAY THEM. I'm serious. This isn't about piracy at all. It's 'content protection', in the sense of "You can't be an artist/filmmaker unless you're big enough to be one of the X many corps which can afford one of the encryption slots. Not many of those! If you're just some schmuck making films, you are NOT ALLOWED to produce standard media. If you try we'll sue."
    Does anybody see what is wrong with this picture? Who is working on making this state of affairs STOP and giving artists the right to create and distribute their artworks? This goes waaaay beyond the pale, and it really has little to do with piracy at all. It's just the same as taxes on blank media for consumers to tax independent content creators- only this time it appears that it might be possible to TOTALLY cut off every indie artist/filmmaker from the ability to reach an audience. Is this unconstitutional?

    1. Re:I don't care about the copying- by ccchips · · Score: 2

      Exactly the reason for my earlier thoughts. I will never support an environment of that kind; it was hard enough with the vinyl record industry, and Heaven knows, the CD-ROM technology must eventually be a Godsend to those who would like to make up their own little shows and have their own little distribution network.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't we ultimately just go for capacity, and leave the encryption/decryption issue out of it? I knew nothing about DVD until this story broke; in my ignorance, I thought it was going to be a lot like CD-ROM, but with far more capacity, and usable for (for example) distributing a whole Linux distribution on one platter.

      Just like before, I think we have to clearly illuminate the issue, which is, as always, that some people are always going to be paranoid about someone swiping their stuff.

      THAT SHOULD NOT BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE TECHNOLOGISTS TO SOLVE! That's a MORAL ISSUE.

      I've had a VCR im my house since 1985, and guess what I use it for? Time shifting. That's it. If I had a media platter that was re-writable, and could store 15, 20, or even 30 hours of video, guess what? It would be for when I'm on vacation, or don't have the time to record and watch later.

      Any dork from the music or mass-media industry that's reading this, spread the word: you're never going to win if you place paranoia and greed above all other motives. You *will* win if you remember who you serve.

      --
      --------------Rev. C.C.Chips---------------- For the real truth, visit
  93. ZIP file here for your pleasure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Click here for the source, all zipped up and ready to go... ftp://134.173.94.44/cssdvd.zip

    1. Re:ZIP file here for your pleasure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's set to accept either anonymous or ftp as a username, with an e-mail address (or anything else as a password). The site is sometimes down however, which might explain the occasional trouble. Good luck.

    2. Re:ZIP file here for your pleasure... by apropos · · Score: 1

      uh, its marked for no access, unless you can supply a username other than anonymous?

  94. Re:A lot of issues - reverse engineering and so on by AArthur · · Score: 1

    I can't comment on doing this digitally, since I haven't worked with really expensive CD-ROM drives, although ALL computer CD-ROM drives are capable of doing it the old fashion way (digital to analog to digital type setup). This isn't the best for sound quality, but in most cases it perfectly fine for everyday -- and is how most Mp3s are ripped and most CD-ROM drives. So basically the analog audio out cable of the CD-Drive hooks to a special analog input on the motherboard.

    On newer PowerMacs (G4s come to mind) I have heard that this is completely digital (a PCM digital cable hooks to motherboard directly), so you don't get any sound degration at all from the decoding and reincoding and redecoding of the music.

    Why they don't just use standard ATAPI or SCSI for digitally encoded sound data is beyond me. Maybe because it takes up to much bandwidth on slower buses? Or maybe because the CD player would stop playing (or play static) when you were transfering lots of data this way?

    Again, I have only messed with PowerPC-based PowerMacs, so I don't know how PCs do this.

  95. Re:I may be wrong by Legerdemain · · Score: 1

    Well, my understanding is that the reason these people worked so hard to break CSS was because it was the first step on a long road to DVD playback under linux. That's the only connection.

    And as Bruce said, RE for interoperability is legal.

  96. Show your support for this with your money! by diz · · Score: 1

    As a result of this development everyone who runs Linux or reads Slashdot should today go out and buy at least one DVD movie, whether you own a DVD-ROM or not. This will send Hollywood and the DVD forum a clear message that they have a much larger market now that they can no longer restrict individual freedom under the guise of "preventing piracy." They accomplished nothing more than annoying users who wanted to play DVD under alternative operating systems.

    1. Re:Show your support for this with your money! by Flower · · Score: 1
      Oh yeah. Let's see, the Consortium is investigating ways of punishing those who have cracked their weak-ass copyprotection and to show them our displeasure at being vindictive for their own damn stupidity we should throw money to them.

      How they shall tremble in terror upon their pile of money which we gave them knowing the size of the market who will buy DVD products. I am most assured that if people had not boycotted tuna but instead used your plan we could save twice as many dolphins from the nets. I can hear Flipper cheering now.

      Serious for but a moment. Unless you send them a reciept and a letter voicing that you would never buy a DVD again all they will see is a sudden spike in purchases as they begin to harrass the people foiling their encryption scheme. Profits==Good to any company. Also keep in mind that those profits will partially go towards prosecuting the people we want to defend.

      Your idea will send a message that they are doing what consumers want them to do.

      This is why you want to boycott DVD and send well written, non-flamelike letters to the Consortium! This way you send a clear signal that explains to the comapnies involved why they are experiencing a loss of profits. Just to make sure we understand the point here. Making money gives a company the impression they are doing something right. Losing money starts a company investigating what is going wrong with their business.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
  97. ZIP file here for your pleasure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Click here for the source, all zipped up and ready to go... ftp://134.173.94.44/cssdvd.zip

  98. Re:Get DVD CSS Code here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wouldn't compile. Where is dvd_authinfo defined?

    If yer gunna distribute it, at least make sure it compiles first...

  99. Re:CSS Decryption code in .ZIP format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Slashdot effect!!

  100. Re:Only one thing to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one idea : if thousand of person from hundred of country add their name in the AUTHORS file this could be a very difficult task to engage a legal action against all this people over the world. This could work only if there is a massive engagement. my 2 eurocents and sorry for my bad english, is not my mother tong, euuuh... my native language. Hervé

  101. Tax deduction for lost revenue due to piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't declare it as a loss because you don't have to declare the income you didn't get.

  102. Re:GOOD! by Xenu · · Score: 1

    I can put "Coca-Cola's Secret Formula" on a web page without violating their trademark. I can't sell a soft drink called Coke or Coca-Cola because that would violate their trademark. A trademark does not mean that nobody can use the name or mark without permission, it prevents others from using the trademark in commerce.

  103. Loss? (was Re:What's the big deal? ...) by nito · · Score: 1

    Loss? Are you crazy.

    You only have loss if you go under the break even point, and that has **nothing** to do with non-executed sales.

    GrossProfit (or loss) = GrossIncome - TotalCost

    Note that GrossIncome is the real deal and not the "Oh if it wasn't for so and so, I would have made so and so" crap.

    In that equation I do not see that "lost sales" anywhere, do you?

    ________________________________________________ _____

  104. Re:Copyrigthing numbers - possibly ! by maroberts · · Score: 1

    You probably can't copyright a number, but you CAN make it a Trademark. Peugeot I understand own all 3 digit numbers with a zero in as tradmarkes

    e.g.. 205,306, 406 etc

    Porsche probably own 911 and some others

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  105. Re:Uhh by Millennium · · Score: 2

    Oh, please. Any computer that comes with a DVD drive is fast enough to play DVD-movies in realtime; consumers wouldn't stand for it otherwise. Most do this through hardware, which is why we need to get drivers for that hardware up and running.

    Many computers anymore could actually do this in software, though it'd eat most of the CPU time. Then again, if you're watching movies it's pretty unlikely you're doing any other work.

    What are you trying to do, add a DVD drive to a Pentium-200? While I suppose you could try it, the money would be better spent on a real DVD player and an upgrade for the computer.

    Oh yeah; before I forget, do you have any idea how long it would take to convert a 4-gigabyte movie file to something like, say, an AVI or MPEG, which woulf come out larger still?

    That's the problem with the industry. So the encryption was cracked. Big deal. DVD piracy is still impractical. One DVD-RAM disk costs more than a DVD movie. The storage space to hold just one DVD movie on a hard drive will set you back by as much as ten movies or more. A DVD drive costs more than a DVD player. And not enough people have DVD drives that you could recoup costs by selling pirated copies, which you'd never be able to sell anyway because you'd have to put them on DVD-RAM media (4-odd gigabytes is still a huge pain to download even on the most high-bandwidth connections), which are already more expensive than the movies, so to make any profit you'd have to price them higher still, and no one's stupid enough to buy that when the movie can be had legitimately for less.

    In other words, you've got four cost-related factors which kill DVD piracy's practicality, at least for the moment. And by the time these are nullified, computers will be powerful enough that the encryption would have been cracked anyway, if it's really as weak as the crackers said.

  106. Re:I may be wrong by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

    The idiots who say this kind of thing in a boardroom will quickly be selected out of the pool of successful companies because they'll start to ignore Linux.

    I don't care if that is actually why they cracked the DVD encryption scheme. It's the reason I'm happy they did, and that's good enough for me.

  107. Re:To The Ramparts! by messman · · Score: 1
    I plan to do as much as I can. I wish I could do more. If I had a website I would post the code there...wait a moment...

    Bruce, you have a website. You can post the code in your website to challenge the big powers. You are in the US and could get legal help from the EFF more easily. And, you said there was nothing illegal there. So, just do it!

  108. Re:I'm not sure I understand by Icculus · · Score: 1
    I expect HDTV to be the "must" for upgrade to DVD

    From what I understand, DVD players themselves will need to be upgraded for (H)DTV. I don't think most of them are equipped to deal with any resolutions but standard NTSC/PAL stuff. Do they even have digital video outs? Oh well, one more reason to wait :)

  109. DVD2=HDTV DVD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd imagine that they'll try to stuff a more difficult to break encryption in DVDs containing HDTV content that couldn't be played on current players anyways. It is an option for them, and common sense would dictate that in 10 years HDTV on DVD will be how movies will be distributed. They haven't completely blown it (yet). However, the fact remains that any attempt to protect piracy by prevention of access to a consumer will eventually fail. "RESISTANCE IS FUTILE." No amount of paranoia or whining from Hollywood can ever stop it, just as whining by the SPA will never stop software pirates. Maybe Hollywood should just count their blessings every once in a while and realize just where the blessings come from - And give some serious consideration to what alienating the general public by inferring they're thieves could cost them. They have always claimed that the encryption was intended to "keep honest people honest". Fuck off, Hollywood. If you seriously believed the general public was honest, there would be no need for such a stupid, untrusting copy-protection scheme. These are the people who put dinner on your table, water in your swimming pools and gasoline in your SUVs - certainly no one you should be dissing.

  110. You can burn DVD's just not encrypted. by rogerbo · · Score: 1

    A correction for you. It perfectly possible already to burn DVD's at home. I work at a video post production house and we can and do burn our own DVD's. Ok the DVD burner was expensive but they'll come down in price. You only need to be a licensee and pay big bucks to burn ENCRYPTED DVD's. But presumably independant film makers are not going to be too concerned about releasing their movies on unencrypted DVD's.

    For a starting filmaker, people passing on copys of their work to friends and even burning illegal copys could help their career a lot as it gets their work seen by more people.

  111. Re:Speak-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry.

    You shouldn't post a "speak up and be heard" post here on Slashdot from an A. C. account. The irony is, well, overwhelming.

    Anybody can sign a post with anything they want for an email address.

    TrouserSnake

  112. Re:Hi! Mr. Lawyer! by Tet · · Score: 2
    Such an obvious trap is laughabel, even thought it often snares the clueless.

    You may think it's a trap, but through sheer coincindence, I genuinely did have the source, and genuinely did accidentally delete it this morning. Sigh.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  113. Re:Bully Tactics by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    >It's called *capitalism*. This system can't exist without an overwhelming apparatus of lawyers, courts, prisons, police, and so on, all of which function to protect the rich crooks from getting challenged by the little guys/gals.

    Um, no. Capitalism means that companies compete with one another to get ahead in a market.

    >How many rich people do you know who are in prison?

    That's the way the world works. Rich people don't have the motivation of starvation to push them to rob liquor stores. When rich people become addicted to drugs they can afford expensive rehab or they can afford to keep buying drugs so they are not subjected to the mental condition that occurs when you are going through withdrawal. So they don't have to rob banks to get their next fix.

    Maybe I'm just naive and old fashioned but I've always thought that the best product *should* win.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  114. Re:Bully Tactics by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    Bad idea. This will discourage legitimate complaints from being brought before a court.

    If Caldera was afraid that they'd have to pay M$'s legal bills do you think that they'd dare even speak the words "Microsoft" & "Court" in the same breath?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  115. Re:Hold your horses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah! I see!

    You want to provide the "hard place" so the ISP can't dodge the rock, and hence will be trapped between the "rock" and the "hard place."

    Cool. Drive all the ISPs out of business. Except, of course, the ones that can afford a legal department (there are about a half dozen)

  116. They did NOT reverse engineer the DVD code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They simly found open keys and thus this is not reverse engineering

  117. Re:Illiterate .sigs and munged e-mails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cower at your command of the English language. Can I be yer concubine, d00d?

  118. where DVD leads us by vleo · · Score: 1

    On a road to a police state it's very important to ensure that media is controlled tight.
    Look 10-15 years into the future if trends exemplified by DVD are allowed to develop.
    You can't distribute video - the only format being DVD that you can't create unless you got a license from the powers.
    You can't distribute audio, since the open MP3 standard was declared illegal.
    You can't distribute even written matter, since publishers afraid of copyright violations enforced that the only format text can be distributed in is closed and has to by licensed.
    And any of these licensed can be revoked for a lot of reasons.
    The only was to speak freely - is in your kitchen - well, congratulations, it's not 1984, it's 2014...

    --
    Vassili Leonov ...it is the actions that affect us, not the motive...RMS
  119. Re:Hold your horses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tend to agree.

    Eliminate all the lawsuits. Make it expensive and difficult to open a lawsuit.

    That will, of course, kill the GPL. I say good riddance.

    Some of you may not agree.

  120. Re:Section 296 clauses 1,2 of the Copyright Act 19 by nstrug · · Score: 1
    This is UK law - Derek is in the UK. I imagine UK law has similar clauses - trademarks and copyright law around the world is mostly based on the Berne convention. Of course it doesn't violate the 1st amendment (if it was in the US). The 1st amendment prevents government from stifling free expression - it does not prevent a company or individual from seeking redress if you attempt to bypass their copy protection.

    Nick

    --
    -- "It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park" - Jim Moran
  121. Re:GOOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well if they copied the actual code thats one thing.. However reverse engineering is perfectly legal (despite what some people would like to think).

  122. Re:Only one thing to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why pool all your money to mount a legal defense fund?

    Why not pool the same money and use it to produce a licensed closed-source (heavens to betsy! dirty word!) DVD player for Linux?

    Or is this not about DVD decoders, and just another little political game, engaged in by people who never use anything but a glass teletype in the first place? (RMS comes to mind...)

  123. Countersue. by bs · · Score: 1

    Sheesh.

    Someone should sue them back for not supporting Linux in the first place. We never would have had to crack it if they would have been nice about it.

    1. Re:Countersue. by bs · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know it's silly.

      I was intentionally being silly.

      I admit I haven't read ANY of this stuff, but it seems really silly for them to take legal action against someone who payed for a DVD and wanted to watch the movie that he or she payed for.

    2. Re:Countersue. by diz · · Score: 1

      Why? Can this fall under the Americans With Disabilities Act? We're not being provided equal access because we are "disabled" in Linux?
      This seems silly. Vote with your dollars. Go out and buy DVDs now whether you have a drive to play them or not. If industry moves to disable DVD-ROM based playback, of course stop buying DVDs alltogether.

  124. Re:GOOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you posted it on the web and called it "Coca-Cola's secret formulae" you would be sued for a trademark violation, I am fairly certain. Of course, you could call it "Fibbitzes secret formulae" and then hope that a journalist somewhere would spread the word that "Fibbitz is the same ad Coca-Cola"

    Is the term DVD a protected trademark?

  125. Re:All for one and one for all. [fair use] by Tyrithe · · Score: 1
    It's along the line that mini-discs are cheap, small, and convenient to carry around. However, you can only do so much to one until they stop working. I'd rather carry a collection of MD's around than all the CDs I have. It'd take up about half of the space. (If I have the estimate right)

    Tyrithe

  126. OK? He's fscked. by acb · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be so sure he'll be OK. With Hollywood and the zaibatsus siccing their legions of lawyers on him, even if no damages are awarded, this will cost him years of hard struggle and hundreds of thousands of dollars of legal costs. And you can bet they're going to want to crucify the guy, so that his tarred corpse on the gibbet may serve as a warning to future reverse engineers.

    It's kind of like that religion popular with all those Hollywood celebrities, which tends to sue critics for the purpose of harrassing them, rather than winning.

  127. He's the name they have... by acb · · Score: 1

    Which means that he's the one they're going to try and drive into the ground. You can't sue John Doe for tens of millions of dollars in Mitnickesque damages if you can't identify him. Fawcus was the one sufficiently trusting/unparanoid/naive to put his name anywhere near this thing, which means it's his name on the lawsuits.

    Would he be facing extradition to the U.S.? Is jail time a possibility?

  128. Bully Tactics by Lord+Kano · · Score: 4

    Every monolithic organization uses the legal system of the country that they're in to bully people when their profits are threatened.

    Look at the RIAA they made Diamond spend tons of money to fight their claim in court when the RIAA knew all along that they'd lose.

    They wanted to scare other companies into not making MP3 players. Had Diamond not been as successful in the past they wouldn't have been able ot beat the RIAA in court.

    Because these programmers are most likely not multi-millionaires and can't afford 60k(US) in lawyer fees the hope is for them to just disappear.

    Like the guys who wrote HLE, like the guys who cracked NT SP4's "security", the DeCSS guys are going to be pounded until they are forced to disappear or by some miracle are cleared.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Bully Tactics by Eric+Green · · Score: 2
      So the best product *should* win, you say?

      That must be why Microsoft Windows out-sells Linux by a factor of 10 to 1, eh? Nothing to do with bully tactics by a huge monolithic corporation with deep pockets but bug-riddled product line, eh?

      Face facts: It is rarely the company with the best product who wins. Rather, it is the company that is most ruthless in destroying its competitors who wins. This is similar to the way that CocaCola Co. and Pepsico collude to buy up all the supermarket shelf space allocated for soft drinks in order to keep competing products from getting a toe-hold, or the way that General Motors bought out all the electric trolley companies so that they could discontinue service and replace the electric trollies with GM's smelly ugly smoke-belching buses. With the approval of the government. Face it, we have the best government that large multi-national corporations can buy. Too bad the only politician running for President who's willing to say so is John McCain, who stands a bat's chance in Hell of getting elected.

      -E

      --
      Send mail here if you want to reach me.
    2. Re:Bully Tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both corporate America and the little guy are being taken advantage of by who? The Lawyers! When the big guys want to do something, they get the lawyers to threaten the little guys and the little guy has to pay thorough his nose to be defended.

      On the other hand, if the little guy wants to go after the big corporation, he gets a lawyer too! Think about it - ambulance chasing, airline accident relative chasing, Automotive fuel tank design issues, High tech stock volatility accompanied with losses, Y2K failures and now disk drive controller bug class action suits. They're basically sharks through and through.

      The solution? I like the one where the losing side pays for the legal fees of the winning side. That way, if RIAA loses to Diamond, RIAA pays Diamond's legal fees. For once, right can become a sort of might.

      The legal establishment doesn't like that idea. They want to collect regardless of whether they win or lose. By having a loser pays scenario, frivilous suits that are used to threaten or intimidate may go the way of the dodo or at least be much reduced.

      Want to take on GM or that hospital or insurance company? Make sure you have a good case. If some big Fortune 1000 company with billions of dollars wants to sue you, they have to make sure they have a good case. This is the system that the British use and you don't see many lawsuits as a result.

    3. Re:Bully Tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Every monolithic organization uses the legal
      > system of the country that they're in to bully
      > people when their profits are threatened.

      That's why we need loser-pays for both side's
      legal fees. RIAA/DVDCon/etc will think twice
      before entering a court battle they know they'll
      lose, and plaintiffs can take loans to get hotshot
      attorneys if they know they're going to win.

      - Adam Megacz
      AC on account of laziness

  129. Re:THIS IS GREAT NEWS by Zurk · · Score: 1

    youre a troll. M$ stifled competition by releasing unfinished products to the gullible public. now open source can only release better products which actually work..it doesnt dump. m$ has stifled business so much that programmers can only release free software to stand a chance of being seen. thats M$ problem - they've hung themseleves with their own tactics.

  130. It's not quite that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no requirement to use CSS encryption or regional coding on a DVD title. That decision is entirely up to the title publisher/content owner. There are many titles out there with no region codes and no CSS encryption. You can make a DVD title yourself, you don't need to license CSS or the DVD specs to do so, and it doesn't have to be encrypted. True, the DVD Forum and Hollywood content owners were ill-advised to use CSS, and they're not going to make any friends by going after the Linux community. But they're not quite as all-powerful as you think.

  131. Contact info? by DerMarlboro · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know who we could slashd . . . er . . . um . . . contact to voice our disapproval of this behavior?

    1. Re:Contact info? by Parity · · Score: 2

      Since the author himself doesn't know who had is site shutdown, I'd say it's unlikely anyone here does.

      I also think that filling a corporate inbox with flames is unlikely to affect their legal department. Maybe their sysadmins would quit in frustration and they'd go under from a lack of digital infrastructure... but I doubt it.


      --Parity

      --
      --Parity
      'Card carrying' member of the EFF.
  132. Re:A lot of issues - reverse engineering and so on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Encryption is pretty irrelevant to this point - it is entirely possible to create a DVD without CSS encryption (Fargo springs to mind; my company uses it when developing our players during initial hardware or drive testing phases).

    Of course, the rest of the DVD standards are also licensed and hence prohibit general entry into content production in the way you mention.

  133. Is it illegal in Norway? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

    I don't know the laws of Norway, so what are the legal grounds for action against the authors/distributors of the DeCSS package? Perhaps someone more familiar with those laws should comment before we get in a tizzy about this..
    Your Working Boy,

    1. Re:Is it illegal in Norway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sound like i'll be moving to norway pretty soon then!

    2. Re:Is it illegal in Norway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds like i'll be moving to norway pretty soon then!

    3. Re:Is it illegal in Norway? by indigo@dimensional.c · · Score: 2

      I don't know anything about Norwegian law, but I am sure Norway is a signator to most of the treaties governing international copyright and patent law.

      This will provide a pretense for suppressive legal action. Whether they actually broke Norwegian law is largely irrelevant.

    4. Re:Is it illegal in Norway? by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      Actually, I do not understand exactly *what* law he is supposed to have broken!?
      I know reverseenginering is going to be outlawed i USA, but have never hear anything about it being illegal in Norway.
      And suing him for making a program that can decrypt/copy DVD's is as silly as suing microsoft for xcopy.
      (xcopy is a perfect tool for making copies of copyrighted software...)

      Can someone enlighten me about what it's all about?

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    5. Re:Is it illegal in Norway? by Bwerf · · Score: 1

      i believe that patents on mathematic algoritms are not allowed in most european countries, i dont think norway is an exception


      --

      --
      If noone rtfa, then what's the slashdot effect?
    6. Re:Is it illegal in Norway? by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 2

      Copyright law isn't that different. However, in EU reverse engineering is explicitly allowed. Norway is not a part of EU, but a part of EFTA, and as such likely to follow the same rules.

    7. Re:Is it illegal in Norway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      As others have noted, Norway follows EU law closely in these areas (allthough we're not a member of the EU). It IS legal to reverse engineer for some purposes in Norway. One of those purposes is to ensure interoperability between your product and a competition (such as ensuring you can read file formats etc.), and this seems to fit into that category.

      A good thing about the guys cracking CSS being from Norway is that it's fairly difficult to use nuisance lawsuits or high legal costs to scare off people in Norway, since - first of all - it's hard to stall court decisions for a long time, and second, your will usually be able to get fairly good lawyers appointed if you can't afford hiring your own

      (when I was sued by the justice department for refusing to accept my compulsary military service a few years back I actually got one of the best and most well known lawyers in the country appointed by the court at no cost to me - the judge proceeded to throw the case out of court without even hearing what the justice department had to say :-).

      And even if they should happen to be convicted, they'd likely get a very light sentence - Norway doesn't that tough sentences... The MOST you can get, regardless of crime, is 21 years of prison (of which you will normally serve 2/3's of if you behave well). I think the max. he could be convicted for for breach of copyrights would be 3 years at a minimum security prison (read: security like a kindergarten, fences you could jump over, etc. Of course you're placed there because they rightly assume that most non-dangerous first time offenders are more likely to serve their sentence than risc that it be prolonged, and being transfered to maximum security prisons, by escaping). He'd be more likely to get a small fine, and maybe a short suspended sentence, though - if convicted, that is.

      But I think it would be highly unlikely that someone would be convicted for this in Norway (or even charged).

      I think it would be more likely that the industry would attempt a civil suit against them, but that too would be very difficult in Norway - Norwegian courts doesn't like to award ridiculous sums of money to anyone... (above 200.000 - 300.000 USD would be considered ridiculous sums of money in most civil suits against an individual)

      All in all, if you're going to be sued, Norway is the right country to be sued in :-))

  134. post crack on a foriegn server by Snoobs · · Score: 1

    If people were smart they would realize that there are some countries were US companies cant do shit. Why not post your little crack on one of there web servers anonymously and let the movie companies fume.

    That way, you don't get arrested, spend thousands of dollars in legal bills, essentially ruining your life.

    In my opinion, if you only use 4 bytes for encryption you deserve to get screwed!

    peace

  135. Any more info?? by AJWM · · Score: 2

    The above linked page is pretty sparse on info, bascially saying the ISP seems to have shut down the website "for copyright violation". This isn't exactly legal action (yet). Where's the rest of the story?

    --
    -- Alastair
  136. More info please? by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    Who exactly got the page shut down and what are they threatening? I'm a bit curious?

    In the mean time, let's start some lawsuits.

    1) Sue Microsoft, Hollywood and all of the DVD manufacturers for conspiracy to restrain trade. DVD's a big app, and there are no commercial DVD players for Linux, which is the only viable competitor against Microsoft. Coincidence, or conspiracy?

    2) Sue whoever got that page shut down for harassment. If the author was within his rights to reverse engineer the code and post it on the internet, threatening him legally should be considered harassment. Corporations like to harass people this way. It's time to start suing them for it.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  137. Re:DVD Forum Are you listening? by peter · · Score: 1

    Did the guy say i386 linux binary? No, he didn't. If they developed a driver (hopefully in collaboration with linus or other people who can help them make sure they provide the right interfaces and stuff), then they would obviously have a much easier time getting it working on a second architecture. I'm sure some company could afford to pay a guy to keep the driver up to date with the linux kernel, and to handle requests for a x-hardware version by using a cross compiler. This person could also keep the driver up to date with new versions of the kernel, if it was found that the binaries stopped working with a newer kernel.

    Obviously, there should be a *BSD driver available too. (and whatever other OSes people ask for).

    I don't know if it would make sense for them to define a new standard for DVDs, and do the above for it. This would obsolete all the hardware DVD rendering cards, I think, so they probably wouldn't do it. New versions of software for the DVD cards could maybe handle it? Haven't taken the time to grasp exactly what is going on with all this :(

    Hmm, wait a minute. If they provided a driver which decrypted a DVD stream, even if the crypto part of the driver was binary only, you wouldn't need to do anything to copy DVDs. Just use the driver itself to get a decrypted copy! If there was a driver that provided a /dev/dvd to be read by a software DVD renderer, you could just copy it to a file instead of rendering it. I don't see how they can provide a Linux driver unless they provide a complete program like they have for windoze, which doesn't give access to the data at any time after it has been decrypted. This would be fine with me, but it would be a lot more work for them. It would also horribly knot the knickers of some open source bigots^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hadvocates. All else equal, I think an open source program would be better. (usually all else isn't equal. Usually, open source programs actually are better (== more functional, stable, and extensible. not always faster of flashier.) :)

    #define X(x,y) x##y

    --
    #define X(x,y) x##y
    Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  138. Ouch! by jfrisby · · Score: 1

    Ouch! This is going to be Yet Another Long Drawn Out Legal Bloodbath.

    My question is: what are they alleging? Copyright infringement? Of what? The key? It certainly can't be the actual decryption software...

    I'm sure that in the long run, the authors will be OK... The industry groups will probably eventually back off... But in the meantime, they are in for a serious storm...

    So, who do we protest to? What industry groups? Has anyone bothered to come up with a form "Letter of Protest"?

    Say, that's an idea! I'll have a "Letter of Protest" on my site for those who are interested within a few minutes... :)

    Jon Frisby, Sr. Software Engineer,
    Personal Site (MrJoy.com)

    --
    MrJoy.com -- Because coding is FUN!
  139. Uhh by tarp · · Score: 1

    Because maybe your machine is too slow to play DVD in realtime, and you want to write it to the HDD and convert it to a different format and play it? Duh.

  140. I don't think that there's a case by miniver · · Score: 1

    IANAL, but ... it depends upon where you are, and how patents and copyrights work where you are.

    Quick summary of Patents, Copyrights, and Trade Secrets for the USA:

    • Patents:
      You get a patent on X (and patent protection) for releasing the method for doing X. You get to charge everyone licensing fees for doing X, regardless of how they implemented X. In theory X is supposed to be a mechanical or chemical process, but software algorithms and business processes are patentable in the USA.
    • Copyrights:
      You get a copyright on X simply by labeling X with a copyright notice. The copyright protects you from other people using a direct (or indirect) copy of X, but if someone else implements X themselves, without any use of your X in their product, you're out of luck.
    • Trade Secrets:
      You can get a trade secret for X just by claiming that X is a trade secret, but you have to keep it secret. Trade secrets are usually fought-out between companies when critical employees (ie: they had access to the secret) change companies, and the new company starts using X. Trade secrets are damned hard to protect, unless you can implement them in hardware that can't be reverse engineered.
    • Reverse Engineering:
      Reverse engineering is the process of gathering information about X without having access to the source code, blueprints, formula, etc for X. Reverse engineering is legal in the USA for purposes of building interoperable products, as long as your final implementation of X does not derive in any way shape or form from the original X. Thus you typically need two teams -- one which reverse engineers X and produces a complete specification of X, and another team (the clean room team) that implements a new X from the specification, and nothing else.

    I am sure that the CSS algorithm was not protected by a patent, since the patent process would require that the CSS algorithm be published in the body of the patent. If it was patented, then the DeCSS implementers would be in violation of the patent, but in the absence of a patent, that isn't a threat.

    If the CSS algorithm was copyrighted (almost certainly) then it would be protected from people making binary copies and using the copies, but that isn't what happened here. The original reverse engineering team (in Norway) may have violated their shrink-wrap license (the one that says you're not allowed to reverse-engineer the product) but shrink-wrap licenses are on fairly shaky legal ground, and the reverse-engineering clause is probably the least legal.

    If the CSS algorithm was a Trade Secret, and someone else figured out the secret, then in general the DVD people are S*** Out Of Luck.

    Of course, this is all subject to the legal distinctions between differing jurisdictions, and I have no idea about how the laws in other countries will interact with the US laws in this case. In any case, I don't think that Derek is in trouble, as long as he isn't stashing decrypted DVD movies on his website, but again, IANAL.

    --
    We call it art because we have names for the things we understand.
  141. Re:Get DVD CSS Code here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Another mirror You can view the unzipped version at: penguin.asa.nl
    The zip also available here: The complete zipfile

    ---
    One day we'll rule, its the future

  142. Questions: by Tarnar · · Score: 1

    Where is the livid page located? Geographically anyway. Perhaps it should be moved to a location where Patent and Copyright laws are a little more... moderate.

    Also, I find the fact that the author doesn't even know WHO'S claiming infringment, he's just getting the shaft and a kick to the ass.

    Goes Google have a backup of the page? How about anyone's cache? The CVS, methinks the repository needs to be archived in many anonymous places.

    We're not in the wrong, but that doesn't mean we won't get our asses slapped around. So lets lay out some contingencies.

  143. Re:THIS IS GREAT NEWS by anonymous+cowerd · · Score: 1

    What in Hell, you nitwit, are they going to arrest Torvalds for? Writing his own code? Giving it away for free? Jaywalking?

    Why is this such an awful ordeal for some people to understand? When are the anti-GNU morons going to realize that if someone - Richard Stallman or Linus Torvalds, for example - sits down and writes an original piece of code it is HIS to dispose of? He can sell it, or give it away free, or keep it all for himself, or give it away with the GNU project restrictions on redistribution, or require users to paint themselves blue and wear a tutu before they can use it. And if any particular user, whining about the constraints on his freedom, doesn't like the license that the code's creator and owner decided to stick on the code, then that user is perfectly free to NOT USE the copyrighted code.

    Besides as everyone knows it isn't good free software that's going to destroy the so-called "software industry." What's going to destroy the commercial software industry is itself, with its unending stream of defective garbage, expensive upgrades that never address the bugs, and the source code kept a deep dark secret. (I think some of these clowns are ashamed to reveal their source code for fear that people who can read source would laugh like crazy.)

    Sooner or later all the rest of the businesses are going to get sick of seeing their hard-earned profits bled away by the commercial software guys, in return for software that not only breaks all the time but doesn't even meet advertised specs. Businessmen don't mind paying money for sound products, but this pointless, relentless, continually accelerating upgrade-go-round has just got to stop.

    Yours WDK - WKiernan@concentric.net

  144. WILL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS DO ANY GOOD by $nyper · · Score: 1

    IF I REMEMBER RIGHT THE GUYS WHO DESIGNED THIS ULTRA COOL BIT OF CODE LIVE OUTSIDE OF THE U.S.


    DOESN'T THIS MEAN THAT THE COPYRIGHT LAWS DO NOT APPLY?


    ARE U.S. LAWS UPHELD IN OTHER COUNTRIES AS WELL?

    --
    "Help me Obi-/.-Kenobi,your my only hope!" -$
  145. Bugtraq by flamingdog · · Score: 1

    So does this mean we can be sued if we submit something to bugtraq?

    ---------------------------
    "I'm not gonna say anything inspirational, I'm just gonna fucking swear a lot"

    --

    ---------------------------
  146. Austrailian Mirrors etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't reverse engineering legal in Austrailia... Can't we just setup mirrors over there and they can't touch it. I thought it was legal here as well... As long as you aren't tainted with the original code it is legal for you to duplicate functionality... If not something is wrong and we need to take a firm stance on this issue. The author should not be alone...

    1. Re:Austrailian Mirrors etc... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3
      Reverse engineering for reasons of interoperability is still legal in the U.S.

      Bruce

    2. Re:Austrailian Mirrors etc... by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      It is also legal in the EU. But Norway is not a member of the EU.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    3. Re:Austrailian Mirrors etc... by Ares · · Score: 1

      I remember doing a report on Norway about 10 years ago (6th grade). In my research I seem to remember something to the effect that Norway did in fact join the EU (then-EEC) in the late 70s or early 80s. However, even if they are not part of the EU, Scandinavia has a long history of being quite liberal in allowing reverse-engineering type activities. So, all other things aside, the reverse engineering was probably quite legal (even in the US for interoperability purposes, which is what we intend to do with it anyway). The goal of the unnamed industry group is simply to scare the sh!t out of the little guy which, as we all know doesn't work when this forum finds out about it.

  147. Re:CSS Decryption code in .ZIP format by laosland · · Score: 1

    Ummmmm, GeoCities say's that the Webpage wasn't there....

  148. Re:Legal Not an Excuse by gargle · · Score: 1

    You need to address the issue - ie: why did I kill you? instead of passing a law saying it's wrong. The latter will not stop me. Education will. Which one is the cheap solution, and which one is the best solution? I'll let you be the judge

    Both are important parts of the solution. The fact that you're punished for breaking the law has an important deterrent effect. Education alone won't do -- there'll always be people so lacking in moral virtue, willing to steal and kill if there were no penalties (even with penalties, there are *still* people who break the law).


  149. Re:Decryption routines.. by Eponymous,+Showered · · Score: 1

    OK, so what if there was a web page set up (or even a little server with a little protocol on a little port) with title keys. No need for all the other manufacturer key crap. One person (per title) cracks the title key in the privacy of his/her home, posts it anonymously to the server. No one can sue the server admin for having a collection of numbers. Debian and RedHat and the like can distribute a player that uses the key to play the movie and don't have to worry about being sued for defeating copy protection.

    IANAL, so this is probably chock-full o' holes.

  150. Re:What's the big deal? Piracy costs industry zero by Smallest · · Score: 1

    Prove me wrong.

    as an independent s.w. developer, i get two or three customers a month who tell me that the only reason they're buying my product is because they can't find a crack that works.

    i know there are lots of cracks available, for different versions of my stuff. but, i release so often, that any given patch has a useful life of only a week or so.

    even so, i have to assume that people are finding the right crack for the right version and... viola, lost sales.

    i can't declare it as a loss on my financial reports (yes, i am a corporation) because there's no way to know how many sales were actually lost due to cracks.

    all i can do is accept the fact that people will try, and succeed, in breaking my 'license enforcement'. so i get on with the real stuff - making the products better. a big corporation, on the other hand, may have the resources available to quantify these lost sales. and, the quantity may really run into some serious money.

    you're trying to justify what is at best disrespect for the terms of the license of the particular product being pirated - it progresses from there to total disregard for the fact that people earn their livings from producing this stuff (not all the money Sony makes goes to the CEO... real, normal people do the real work) - to, at worst, the idiotic idea that you are fighting a corrupt and evil system.

    here's a clue : there is no system. there are just people trying to make money to buy the crap they want. trying to get a free ride by breaking this or that protection scheme is stealing. a theif is a theif. accept it and do something useful.

    --
    I have discovered a truly remarkable proof which this margin is too small to contain.
  151. Preserve the source. Download it NOW. by kinesis · · Score: 1

    The next thing the lawyers will go after is the CVS repository. Grab the source while you still can.

    CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.on.openprojects.n et:/cvs/livid cvs -z3 co -r Ver-0_9 css-auth

  152. Re:Legal Not an Excuse by Ace_ · · Score: 1

    Education is very important; the thing is that if you took the time to educate yourself then you would realize why it is wrong to kill someone. You see, there are so many laws that teaching you all of them and why they are wrong would take their enforcers far too much time -- but the ability to be educated still is available. You just have to take some time out of your day. If you want to be part of society or civilization or government (I use these terms somewhat loosely), you must abide by the law of the land as well as natural law.
    If the law of the land is wrong, change it. There are peaceful and effectual ways of changing the law of the land. They may be time consuming, but I stick to my statement above.

    Sorry, I guess I'm getting a little off topic -- my point is that if what these people did is legal then good for them, if it is illegal then they should either pay the price or change the law or change their ways.

    Legal does have a meaning by the way. It means created by or conforming to law (something along those lines, not sure what Mr. Webster would say).

    --
    -- Ace
  153. Here's two companies to add to the list by B.D.Mills · · Score: 1

    Here's two companies that I would add to such a list:

    "Tetris Company, The" - this company allegedly have the rights to the game Tetris. They allegedly use bully-boy lawyer tactics to attempt to shut down every Tetris clone on the Internet. For more information and to see some nasty lawyer e-mails, visit www.geocities.com/Hollywood/243 0/tetris.html

    "Franklin Mint, The" - This company allegedly stole the copyrighted rules for Star Trek 3-D Chess, and when the creator of the rules finally found a lawyer who would do the case for free and sued, the company allegedly used every dirty lawyer trick in the book to derail the court case. The creator eventually lost the case in March, 1999. Official star trek 3-D chess rules may be ordered from the author's site at home.interhop.net/~bag/rev3d.htm. This site used to have details about the lawsuit as well, according to www.treksites.com/Reviews/632.shtml.


    --

    --

    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
  154. Feedom to INNOVATE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. If you are too bloody slack to support other platforms, then you risk having it done by someone else. Nitendo and playstation game software, then car performance mod chips scanner chips, and now DVD. What you see is the time lag reducing = net collaboration. You cannot store secrets in silicon. full stop.

  155. Down with big business by cdlu · · Score: 2

    This screams in my ears that big business is, yet again, hurting us more then helping us. Progress is the enemy of profits. It may be worth it to start a Slashdot Defense Fund, as this is one of the larger (largest?) forums of free-software users and writers.

    1. Re:Down with big business by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      "Progress is the enemy of profits"?

      It strikes me that most of the more-advanced nations in the world are largely profit-oriented. Societies that have stagnated or withered away have been disproportionately communal; witness the Utopian movements, most indigenous tribal cultures, the more Socialist states, and so forth -- which have largely disappeared or been defeated. To fade away is not progress.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Down with big business by Captain+Sarcastic · · Score: 1
      Perhaps profit is not the enemy of progress. Most people, though, tend to use the same reasoning as Calvin of "Calvin and Hobbes" fame, after Hobbes refuses to take the blame for a mishap suffered by Calvin. Calvin says, "But considering what a shambles my life is in, couldn't you take at least a little bit of the blame?"

      --
      Strike while the irony is hot! -- The Freethinker
  156. What can we do to help? by handorf · · Score: 0

    Can we put together a legal defense fund of some sort? Otherwise any Open Source or Other player for Linux is going to be illegal!

    Where do I send my money?!?
    -- I'm omnipotent, I just don't care.

    --
    -- IANAEG - I am not an elder god.
    1. Re:What can we do to help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont realy think you need to help much.. After all he is living in Norway.. He hasnt broken the law here... As I seem to recall the encryption beeing a trade secret and not copyrighted.. Meaning.. this is just steam blowing from the DVD makers.. just relax and wait for the courts to dismiss the case.. and still he will get a okey lawyer appointed that will clear out that mess.

    2. Re:What can we do to help? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

      I agree. I'd be willing to donate US$20 (approx the price of a DVD ;) to help out.

      While I don't presently use linux, it can't hurt to have more than one DVD program floating around - the one that came with my computer isn't particularly impressive IMHO.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  157. Re:THIS IS GREAT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll tell you what they're going to arrest him for. They are going to arrest him for writing Open-Source software. That's right!!!!! I'm lobbying the United States congress to pass legislation making open source software illegal. With regards to your point about how they can do whatever they want with it since they wrote it, well duh!!!! If I made a homemade bomb do I have the right to blow it up in some crowded market??? Well I made it didn't I? duh!!!!

    The point is that Open-Source preys on the legitimate software industry and if it is allowed to continue unimpeded it will drive companys out of business. That's not the American way, and you can bet that plenty of us are going to work as hard as possible to outlaw Open-Source!!

    Sheez, give it a rest. It's not like anybody actually _likes_ using linux. You won't miss it, trust me!!!!

  158. Passion. by 311Stylee · · Score: 1

    Once again those who seek to make lots of money are 'beaten' by those who love computing/coding. Once again, this has really pissed of the people who want our money.

  159. Part 1 of the uuencoded css-auth program. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Part 1 of the uuencoded css-auth program.

    begin 644 css-auth.tar.gz
    M'XL("-TS(S@" V-S31TJ$+$XH4DN0=O3O]^MN@ 0E.9FS59/:2SR3R5@$&XV^
    M?MUHS:Q]%57EXN#%7_>C3P[?G)[J%YI^#C?^=K_H-X>]P]= 'KWNG1UKW#D]?
    MOWZA3U_\A)_*EE&A]8LBS\OOK?O1\_^E/S.O__-/XX/_,?K O'1WU?NG_I^M_
    M]->_]/^7_YRMK"D>37$697FV7N:5
    M_??9H^WF63=?F6Q5Y'^866F[F2G/#O#@($T>DUB]^/7S?]+ _S2JW29D7ZY_K
    M_T??_5_\?9&61&/NS\_^;XSW"@#JZC
    MKV:>I :+CP\NBT06OH6^SGJ]LY/7]*'^!?\7
    M._@K;.S[_G]RW#MB_S\\/>F=G+YY0_7?F],WO_S_9_S\[6^ D@P\W]_K#X&8P
    MZE_IN_OW5\-SC3^#F_% R0+\?#*%3?),'W7T?U29(1OK*:7/\]6Z2!X6I=X[
    MW\>'?W_;X4?ZLC!&C_-Y^1051E_F519')0AT]#";=97>_7/ Z5D_,H='\)J8\
    MSZ]>8>L]'6X68YS 7BFZZ5%_95,BVB8JV?.5F2V=)$\XMM!@GG?):CXO3*:?(-B5B; Z2-%BJGI,./2*."C,W14''@02LYWB@4U!
    ML3]1G5TLQ*9:UDIE ELCAD-2,K,@*>0ACFL0*QDKAB81I,G9UMXE0(L;)
    MI.U7>9235@IRW((/**NZ:B+OM':!2]LT*IGXS!1EA -CQ0H/DVF2)F7BXA!1
    M%HFJG1H-)=DACISXEWF&"^112E.W[%3G*VFBUTY$4.62T,N 9W"
    M;V7")^:8H>>JL#R0*->3#9I>5
    MP.[+A2Z?H-/2K.R9WNOM-9SL\NY75"#8/F :W".HD 0G-*JB_8%-PO!$+)4+0 JD;NR%=$^R+)%"^/0N.:[H
    MQ+Q_3-&QD!,C@7ESH,P(YXQ$Z'7FI$,D64RMH(J8TOF4 XEL4N,9>'RF#6QS
    MQM[&>6C1D,'?2$,&F'K==4$3-D'F C6S\;#$EU%,8$;/4A,Y#B$"=R!QOVF-
    MH6(Q36=:OSFX05$>'Y/JS[-Q?Z_/;F8C@9WMZ,]>7M2+L2J Z,O
    MAN/):/C^GA[QPNO;B^'E\+Q/'Q#SAUU&3KN@DC-'%C9.(#C F*2^^NLA R!!J
    MLRHBT5#N71&09GLEHVC"SB)/*;G8:.V@[1((%%)OXD:LJCK _B P]3MX-+[HB
    M]I=WPM]+H&XY[L,F7?)1I)-[,.WMJ:FF0Y[1)^,C!
    M$Z)!=,%J\@B-P;Z8BC#?'#B-GL[$IQ/F!2?'MK+6BYPIKQG ],MS])2'/ 85RYQD\(>F6+S
    M3GW(.#>2"7I= 3'1^L\4K!ZK.3*_V1#'D'I#1:%;)K,HKF\KNB#D$8A-K%VL(Y4 F?7
    MXLR^7).=!."M'97(X@F*HM9WBRJBM\3+?X8-LD =1D WE!.,ZS7&F+
    MF$YDGI" 1:!-B@)A11DHWR0^K94DKU49@\@DR/7P\(,DA,,LJ7
    MCD=@M7TX+Q ^ZA?VFX8%=]?8XP-8+Q;OI/
    MB7G:B(E,I4%X>X-O,\/AZHP2;"MEE]:DW(NF]3VRGLV[L'%
    MJ$H("^!YA#)06^,:+RP@*B?Y%0%#S[IFA_,2]1ZFQ$=D\PS 4N)5+T*A@A-C@
    M#EIL#;R/[(PVL [O+2'C1ZK#2O*$T =%LX1XV$4[U,?B7G5SSARIK6:?76DC
    M('&_([(;6U/3N2KK%]2&T=EH&4@%;W/HX1I30HR4)HEM)16 UF50XL(: TR4M
    MH>&+0O>6CT*J+0%I #?M$*GS! 1X,(P:XANUQ)WJ%:FV$D_49J6YM@$+W:":P+BE/OO91TPG9PX& 1$P"OI_#%1M
    MJZ>AI047#LU67-XH\\T44O[ZQIGTAJB%D>X4
    M=E! Y07@7$K=#%].V9U0 &9E1:)'*WLZ1(%ST\D)0\65?SR#E(*KL(J4VL
    MQ0&2/_P.$MFGWR/]F*)0M/"Q[^ .PF;;--4
    MI>S,_ASM4X[*IS1J5_? H;U957*\(42V(_^JL?>X
    M'O-PI!E%/0>B$ RH9>9\2EH:D$"#G_HSY.05P178;ZT-^BPUG.L*Z2ES(ES"
    M,X"@7E$R)R8%0#5%2,?YO/?:H*GP'20HN:9]'%:P4]X,U/) E5"2P_\HWAIHF
    M(24=06/O(,).C_G.2_H8/9ZAG
    MCDP8A;MG40I>,HEG#L:X:UMI#\RY?9@1$J5(B;)MJ]WAVPB 4].C]FK\0:_W8
    M>?F\-4"-:JNCLAQR*:2]H\?5U&>'J4@?T(602^N";-X$%>F ("2]\+2CJ6-:9
    MDQ;199SKU+8K,\B3;T0ON6@(F9:.7.WZLKOBW65+?Q^SQ1& ;>9(ETFNE.LNMESA/!;&?K/*&[\!4?90W7CZ/;/+X-OGITH)4J TRQBW,:V
    M])#DYUMH(:!.$"OP +JM% QSK=J%ZQL14FZI"!\7#TL@MB>N!MS:7(N5RB:
    M@J&2@,A&NR@0!MT::'W28 :R(FD$2;L&]1\WT06_AJBEA2646"I9K_FVHD8N
    M%U NU?MP'D 5NLVD!A.L8E4JQCA/C ;S9[=_?G>*GW2O)#;(=T5116F@=,F,
    MLDA"BFS=>^Y@2]5^Z 5,$)HOA>K@*CTK%H:_9F?U4H;P""WH"=;W;WYR(2F:
    M\9N:,78=5A.5-Q2+/0.H!^FB"__.JU0B2YI$*!X9[IV*ZGQ Y%U:;9)*K%XO9YA Z22TYWT].U7(QQOZ(%L#>:
    M]WNNP?ALDWU?FCMTX3BKK4;VCUQ3MZ7CD@$L75-3Q]&/&?T K%WO"=^4>I4R6Q@&4[T']'YRX-=2PX4#.^*E$]M[H0YKR%\GNB 4R*B!.W
    M>XG!!;_G"][-L:BDZVSSS&6H'Z%PX2E!9G"=RWE5\'U5:^# $U6!-4_TW71>;
    M+KBZ ,!V#5$L^(JKJ]J>Y"94!"6ALL5_9Z2GQ@/=E5(0CODSB6Q
    M_/Z!^C=Z3V^9E
    MXF8+W7TUW+4R=K^C BMD,,QR9$,@V]ES\R]T*.$*R(\1"SIYPZ-6YK:@7G9
    M9%FEB2V^_!:R[U;RF1H+ $OPN"G\#>G,=P\OJ"S5VQ
    MQ$@+,QK1X+9]_1O*2$85.(JX;>I2_(FN\ N^
    M@Z3IOBV63*R\M7/H)YGTO"V'#AYKF46U&P1P!*_],XU4:M5 ?=W+
    M0U0'8FNUL)5G5EMM]1RHB
    M_M[UEVN;?8H#-_6Z$;$2&XQ/T/6!'P[EPHB^ZN6K4[*5QOJ GZ^9F*ZS3)48W
    MML7'=AG $3V*8^D[D!% W0^&EJ\6?(/>.F(P](*\)G=Q2@)Q
    M?92.C&9&9?O5UM;S>V4Y^V^5)F&='T4E2?OJB,(\)W]Z*RF FH
    M^5&^EF&5T_TS(^F" 0C%DCOA;QQO3&W.A
    M(4)8[Q+!QB79NIYAR3W.]Z]0;;J;FUW?R9#1I3CQM>:&3\( 8]2]F[V
    MO>+1FYW H2=;F[UY_YHU+^9?&']][KZ_>"\?S\>Z,G'@;X;W7X8]:_U7^O QC?_1AT*%UHP&M"&G1C&Q *MN^??![Y/!S43?#4;7P\D$U-Y_
    MT?V[.Q#OO[\:Z*O^9TAS\/OYX&ZB/W\W4Q&/&T[@%VYQ?U7 7\T&0[&"GQ\&EZT#_6R/P;;+_7G
    MX>3C[?VD9IX.U[_YHO\QO+GHZ,&0"0U^OQL-QCB_ NWA-3@>X.'PYOSJ_H('
    M@=^#PLWM!'+"R'99 -/H?8&TDS$#OZO,0FY.&-I7?X5?PH%'^%YC1K;[N?Y'!
    M["_./,!F/;G=M@H816.=_?]J[^O?FSBR='^V_HJ.LP$)RT; =^L:8.[(D)]XA
    MP,4DNWD8XFU)+:S%EK26;& GF;_]UGG?4Q\MR4"8A#NS:S\/C;JZONO4^:IS
    M3AT^E3DX-/TY1K=,1V1"9(EZG>\[W_9/R@4'!&A:CW5?%GW ;*_ G*L2G:Y3/7(R;-&SIAW%AZ6"O\"46B1
    MCF5HTF-7^L)FAGT?SICDBYZQR,F@.L"[4>BZ
    MF20U@GPH\XGRUF(@F("[AEF3$RI6/3"RQS@R)#^E,5$**(! 5^"/4M>I>_?Z]
    MJ1\5",T'R_.(K4(J#=R'[AM%^>]S9/0'@0JT+8F=CT+'66+ =_X4>%$*Y>PY[06O0:=ALJ6*52IO)_00B?9(!2@K.
    MO>@&,0Y+!1]>D;(6.G11JX=0[LQA'!(::?RWV19@VD?X@!1 OE5
    M'__R9WOS%PKBD@@%06@A(DHTXE\8%M#)4GCE3 S5+F=3,R!Z QK6WZ"]R3FU
    MGCECC9QQ:MDB1^M3DLH\7CI[WO/)&Z+2 FP?33Z@I@4=*G)FKF8'96I,]>W4
    M\-?79.PM?#?:Y4V;.;^5UTH/C2"A[J.=PY.GCPWC\?BGD&G >!T@H-$3+]P:^
    M_P..JV_O[OE=L8H./.$!)F0G++A:[
    MNX+&(4U.L:)W>G26REK[(+DL1W;@O
    M"PN1WL]YS#&E,;N>^;;>^D8IF/R;@P%2_Y!9TUOU,C]51,* ,R>
    MW:G33&/_*KV)ODN';[)+8,"'M"(1OV\#)2_>
    MFYTVFSXJ1[%AU"XGYPA+(AP+/Y0E6,=B8MV[?C00I$K=&[" N4['HH9%7;PC\
    MA.L+Q48AWUY>._&K*/^+^5AJ'_M0KBOU7CVFW\IR_Q=V:VK S@3'40^PEJ!
    M\_Y7 8)V0PV(!N_!_'39@4Y57^@K40(
    M@19IR#1;JJ ]>A#]2S'H6\F\:O]+A:W7P^'JY]U9]"]_*A2T%BEM>U1:[W+_M R>#WV "4)_U+T4U.*2K>$YO?"_P2E/Z2-
    MC^#_1KVB\;]KM4HEEOB_4V!WY>C)A;]*2U#;
    M.2=D6%R3"X6[ >2MQ0)2K%@DJ4F'6+;,AC/5K:16,W@^,XS["!84B$5#R:#W
    M8P]2A.I :>Z=C4+E#N0E5"/^ )17TY&UB!A&;S*U*)HL#0XT;]+WP4K?16RW
    M5C(Y;P$9P"@;7K[G.6]Z_GIF1(ZSB[+Z-JFO)U6E;].E$5= ,G^]*&]!6N% =
    M(E,O(%"+X...-D5]:)CIN?DNBA*-83"[I@EZ82#3LG#M>/F 43']F74=USC$S
    M+[Q$MCDA8S/^6I$*MJZC:TE5;M?I8B)N Z8N?U^(B=.)N&-3"WSJ:O 5@Z
    M_D_H5P#:%(^8C3X9UD3 3@[%0/IO@QZK]#M$2+>EF@K.C&"EVHAM*;EK2FZC
    M6\4+L4MAE=?454#S7/IPGZ/[*,5^#3>NYX-UF56%&Y$5JL[ E%/Z:60JQ/ ,>"F$0#C>/&AU0^1&KF[U)F8SEZ9MXOH8IZ]-B1_-)F9I$C2KI _-+XS(5:LW
    MFJU7LJBG,F.KH**H4%JUL]"@+JKTZ?:P"SV1OQM=*F8@]K
    MK&^FAAD7(.G 4)+=V[L(:":DMZON,3D""B&50U_8[
    M6UM$V*2TJJ.QCNO(B@XTZG2KIA\29)9ZW>.E]7M1O[,0#[O U80D/I :>SF&?T3\"&9./UXE@%Z,EI*2H2%BZMW3HL&4U!Z^? (
    M!?6+:EI7^3BRSOZ&)*B&7K8&=OZ@W>OX6;3[BVR;1#:_
    MF8!= 7LCR.T6"D^>ON@_P%FH59L1=XE2SO%9VZ/ ?M =_ B&,5S0
    M9#9QLEV>V;K,LOQK9D"[\VXP
    MD[!YR)ZI)I(1%
    M0A>=,,R%YGW&/K.3"-5%&S^[\.C;TWDV/3SI12JV$VE2@4F C'A8$T:?Y$PV%"V7M7$-'WZ?)R
    M\NZNF6DSM;V9HN,C_2[PV01Z -NH47*^-2)$,G8=G0!JLO
    MX:H)# *MLJWL"@;RCH,GSI)Z)+*":J9/:'QMM5 *0L^DA]QJ15KY5MY5Y"\>
    M#&Q=-!$0Y+HHY9;*'OSP!-ZB=X"%C>F^@H?3LT;,%#B4_TY D^+N9Q&[9D-]LB4DH*D
    M4(@+P."A$"$WF(_\N&KF\>VSQV6IP4D:8".MAC-WEHRF[A2 DS_K%A2WU+B8(.!B/SM^'(U
    M+S(Q8;?6\4OK;R!H0BUV$8MDD@DP\F_ES>3K>4E]A1%\*4
    M17>OTTMQ$;VKL>MGEZ_3*7P8BHQF #G*X%]#*$KEB!B8,S9XO_2!"X,:#18W
    MLJ-!Y&MUKJX:DE,7/U&D1GO6"OL@9TCN!*KQY'*!^2IVA6[ _V? OI2!DT,P:
    M]2-4G'/W]X-TW;1=.8$W^-)M$Q"5W^_VGANPU [%0(Q)F;&*%(@>=[4 : S
    M6#C)XH(L#$,)V;ET&RT-ELGRY")KZ(+F(2K85I,EG>-D'^Y QKW^MW%6T[4\O
    MM@L%8>N-!&8PC/K4PV3IJIKL%PH(WSB,$/Y:][8$@].U*0. >& (VNC>9SJ],
    MDAG8E1D85&_1/9H E4Q5J,-!P,W5.%!X7"U7RLURO1PEY7:Y4:Z56[^:#FRAA)R-&* [V95QYM5_8DEY,Y)L@Q^+$
    M%&_O1Y/HT4%4V8]V=R>EPM:6+3*TU/7KV2>G22W,BT&Y^U5 G@4UO(%#+.0M3-&(3X3;3S'>([**!&C1(P2,4K$*!&C1(P2
    M,4K$6J*2H'P%SP:>-3RK>,9X-O&L:QLH$:-$C!(Q2L0H$:- $C!)Q_4N#94 NFL>NA5Z6P'T#K5$-8#^IH=^A>Y! -UC
    M+1$'.Z6N.\7OA+;N!.RY?V#H%@CY-_49>#N+'A^=/#?P9:; WEU K("S0(KL:S78O#>MD:A)@=3%G).>_5)R$@O='W
    MX JNJ7:_WB69OTNS?N>?("I"4^UN=)Y-R>.*&^Q_^Q@"K"9D,J/Q ;)XNZ2%Z),;$QM7YA,HJN7$=UF
    MXL#&-A?A>[_,&$QX&,8!Y![34;.\T?NV0A,0R3
    M8*!$8%6N*;E$L!;A2IW0&3*5%B1/!=J*V/3*,XH\)XXDTQ4 ZF5CFE7#Q/*D '50+,3)Q=LLUTJ*^8)J?[DG>>\7MC N
    M@\6*B]U'@Y>55]'#AP9.2]$OFA(CI8T$IB2OHCO1WTP6R2G I+9 X+%:R&]B$GNHC\$>_+NG6L> WA+D9Q +5,CA:TF _-
    M;FDU,K@B?SUZ%"6U4O1S%+S'*^^5_'N

  160. Part 1 of the uuencoded css-auth program. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Part 1 of the uuencoded css-auth program.

    begin 644 css-auth.tar.gz
    M'XL("-TS(S@" V-S<RUA=71H+G1A<@#L6UMSV[B2SNM![8] Y67L*D6V?$E.
    MG)=5;#G1'M^.)">31TJ$+$XH4DN0=O3O]^MN@ 0E.9FS59/:2SR3R5@$&XV^
    M?MUHS:Q]%57EXN#%7_>C3P[?G)[J%YI^#C?^=K_H-X>]P]= 'KWNG1UKW#D]?
    MOWZA3U_\A)_*EE&A]8LBS\OOK?O1\_^E/S.O__-/XX/_,?K O'1WU?NG_I^M_
    M]-><L7=X^/KDY#OZ?_TZT'\/^C_J'9V^T(>_]/^7_YRMK"D >37$697FV7N:5
    M_??9H^WF63=?F6Q5Y'^866F[F2G/#O#@($T>DUB]^/7S?]+ _S2JW29D7ZY_K
    M_T<G&_Y_?'QZ_,O_?\9/X]0'WA1^>??_5_\?9&61&/NS\_^ ;XS<;^._H]4GO
    ME___%/\_O[W[,KSY<-#K\C\'D\KHVUFICU[KH]Y9[_CL^%3 WWKY]>W"@#JZC
    MKV:>I :+CP\NBT06OH6^SGJ]LY/7]<+1H']Q/<"R4UYVDS]J?:H/C\Z. 3D&R
    M7N:-KSO#TJ.#SR86BF]T[_3L%+N?;B]=_"E.:?DL*IGPVQ_ R$!L[*Z+E-#7\
    M0F^#DY.W.-YS+RQ^^$+\&"?9/&?2)]_EI3#6E']B76E+$.6 %Q]];>*'^!?\7
    M._@K;.S[_G]RW#MB_S\\/>F=G+YY0_7?F],WO_S_9_S\[6^ D@P\W]_K#X&8P
    MZE_IN_OW5\-SC3^#F_% R0+\?#*%3?),'W7T?U29(1OK*:7/\]6Z2!X6I=X[
    MW\>'?W_;X4?ZLC!&C_-Y^1051E_F519')0AT]#";=97>_7/ Z5D_,<I4:?9=&
    M,]/1XRHIC3X^/NSH][DMZ?WK/LSGJ-?KO>H='\)<[L=]I0< H8M8Y^$JL7IEB
    MF90E?++,]0P,ZBB+=9Q8I+=I!7)8.P4S2WJ(A*=T/M?E F^FR<QDUN@XGU5+
    MDY4=C?5ZMHBRAR1[T$E)Y+.\U%&:YD\F[BH(B"5T5Q@."!" )GBR,IV3U/"_T
    M$IQKZV5!?Q!!DH=,."P15G7T%*WU.J\*-8?@XGQ)3^R"UX- Y9@&'*[M:OU^#
    M;Z3JR(*_$GNQ^DQFBBC5=]446ZLK=Q"PFV2ER6+9ZJ&*B@B _&]Y*?V\K>J8\
    MSZ]>8<F2^+05EM&F]7&P!:WE@T(LX-'J"E6E[9(D$JO:K&G /6K1:I1 ^;<[R
    M81V8MMVHQFY^LX$$,SY-E*UUCG<*C4+U 0%9/RURHHR EA<64EK"#K!255;4
    M!Y;VQOG2N->>L]'6X68YS 7BFZZ5%_95,BVB8JV?.5F2V=)$<7=?ZR]YI6=1
    MQH==:V&&1>\XMM!@GG?):CXO3*:?(-B5B;Z2-%BJGI,./2* ."C,W14''@02<
    M CMDDVI58'^<\!;D=W-FMVPOU&E4DE6H1?0H&@ZL(_ =<9DM_O2>LYWB@4U!
    ML3]1<P%;ZV1.I/538A?[G7HKG&5FDD<B4A4S(AU#,P4+[,' UTKE7X31XM?@
    M55KC++5EC7@=QJ?!XTRX)"*9SLR3\.OE_DZ,R)/[FN5/-=T X)YJ6*$/.EK4S
    MR>G5TLQ*<1V.>9:UDIE ELCAD-2,K,@*>0ACFL0*QDKAB81I,G9UMXE0(L;)
    MI.U7>9235@IRW((/**NZ:B+OM':!2]LT*IGXS!1EA -CQ0H/DVF2)F7BXA!1
    M%HFJG1H-)=DACISXEWF<S,E\6127>&"^112E.W[%3G*VFBU TY$4.62T,N9W"
    M;V7")^:8H><&A'@?9&/]D#C[@W4D()5!.!17&BFP7,F---E J5[R,W]TP9[RR
    M9@?KU*86F!>>JL#R0*</DZCYL N8!-8LO3$@JU ,8JIB,/B_I%!>->3#9I>5
    MP.[+A2Z?H-/2K.R9WNOM<UZ2Q-F6.LQ2[1WM0W[P<V<F069 Z6B00*LG(\L/4
    M/,#-.>-9SL\NY75"#8/F :<A5F.X'W/=3RTD1+HP$6F,PR?BK3L*425GP8'$
    MX-D;O<$[@U,L<..S<$6&"VB5Q;96A833+,?[!66A-6_)IVL E&RAB.-_*,<Q\
    MPG$8GR\-[6)2*\E@%5F+1X0.GHQRT<*&%@1VG<K S),W#C8@G]-IQQPJ2;(H
    M[6 /.1(E&0@"J7W)N;3(XVHF;' 2(>W".HD 0G-*JB<M!+24RT>_8<&J*CG#
    MB+E<TN-TW>%-PO!$+)4+0 JD;NR%=$^R+)%"^/0N.:[H<4EY%G9'L94CR&.>
    MQ+Q_3-&QD!,C@7ESH,P(YXQ$Z'7FI$,D64RMH(J8TOF4 XEL4N,9>'RF#6QS
    MQM[&>6C1D,'?2$,&F'K==4$3-D'F C6S\;#$EU%,8$;/4A,Y#B$"=R!QOVF-
    MH6(Q36=:OSFX05$>'Y/<ZW41 [.NQV KTG_MN9R?<IQ0HB;1)$?!"3I-^'*V
    MKL3:9H(&YCFAO:[Z-_5#N(RGD\'H>JS[-Q?Z_/;F8C@9WMZ ,]>7M2+L2JZ,O
    MAN/):/C^GA[QPNO;B^'E\+Q/'Q#SAUU&3KN@DC-'%C9.(#C F*2^^NLA R!!J
    MLRHBT5#N71&09GLEHVC"SB)/*;G8:.V@[1((%%)OXD:LJCK _B P]3MX-+[HB
    M]I=WPM]+H&<#P7448Y::?4X+P1F(>XY[L,F7?)1I)-[,.WM J:FF0Y[1)^,C!
    M$Z)!=,%J\@B-P;Z8BC#?'#B-GL[$IQ/F!2?'MK+6B<V9<XN R7N4%FP&#B8YR
    M#-0U!)V XGMH,M:'W#HWQQ0[Z/RL,97"-ZOH@42V]Q&1$8%@#A%WZA=H0P ;O
    ML[0B\$Y;Y!79.B"M>YPIKQG],MS])2'/ 85RYQD<XJ(X!BA@-['Z)7+'2SA*
    M'^']40!"[N1*P.HYOV@=DL$D <\&(8MU.'-X)R&645E5VH1='AD4U+VI1!0M
    MYZJHLBW1NZ#LD8Z).PZQ,37$482!?!F^H@*PGF<$M^>\(>F 6<P"'T:3DC*BW
    M#$WYG?<0!LV*H%?&50DB%C$W-<#G'+APSAT<[W?59P$XNC: RHB*X3;0L[>+S
    M3GW(.#>2"7I= 3'1^L\4K!ZK.3*_V1#'D'I#<$VP.<G80Y;( A6 &)P/8=XT
    M^%>1:%;)K,HKF\KNB#D<RV&[^&1%CHX$@T,P1G!,AJM4XVD N\KA#S-(H64(J
    M8-IG_G?ZJS$K<@FR (?NE+QF?<8B_$/E<2L22N5'AX^FUF38A7(9SE:35K2&
    M0613'P9 H"TZ& (?Q0<VMX^*TAS:%=S6K(:J:BU)I</@U>$8A-K%VL(Y4F?7
    MXLR^7).=!."M'97(X<1\Y2(,G;F&1P'^HJ3[S5?F'C2SY1P UEN/P'5.44Q6[
    M#<9'3!?9E$0VK*@X+RZ%W6=#<<?E4K'3$&AR:&\'0A?@]8Y 4,G:'ZZEH"K_=
    M89<P#0#NI3%B)'(*:X(\?J:XE13M-T7 +*JL5! U9J2N-<?\&63+@L49R;V=
    MR3$-2W&5?=K7F"QOB3E"P4>@F*HM9WBRJBM\3+?X8-LD =1D WE!.,ZS7&F+
    MF$YDGI"<^2D#L**LTSI_9B75T;DV0J!3+-/@]QAVYW,J@EJ ("C$B<KM$) 5O
    MSY2BV!N3(JZID $]AP1\ZI?CS_8]=*]%[Q-]!KMB7 E4&TMOAJL#:D\5$:4A
    MQ!EW> 1:!-B@)A11DHWR0^K94DKU49@\@DR/7P\(,DA,,L<0]9B*&)FV H&C!
    MA2&X2RC(%Z04 "4R:+&G+,LK1!=J KHDS$[1BGAZ9\2+F(#[X/G:9X\P+>J7
    MCD=@M7TX+Q ^ZA?VFX8%=]?8XP-8+Q;OI<WJ8@J;#N/2J$E3G[^(G.9B-]>/
    MB7G:B(E,I4%X>X-O,\/AZHP2;"MEE]:D<]]S]#H ;TR"<AVG]-H21/C2)<A:
    M(N]($&M%('^:;83PGU522 M&*&X0Z^X#N?N^":]=2E.!>W(NF]3VRGLV[L'%
    MJ$H("^!YA#)06^,:+RP@*B?Y%0%#S[IFA_,2]1ZFQ$=D\PS 4N)5+T*A@A-C@
    M#EIL#;R/[(PVL [O+2'C1ZK#2O*$T =%LX1XV$4[U,?B7G5SSARIK6:?76DC
    M('&_([(;6U/3N2KK%]2&T=EH&4@%;W/HX1I30HR4)HEM)16 UF50XL(: TR4M
    MH>&+0O>6CT*J+0%I #?M$*GS! 1X,(P:XANUQ)WJ%:FV<-MXD%EQMI!V"#[@
    MXE..59B'J(B1#%C_>$D_49J6YM@$+W:":P+BE/OO91TPG9P X&1$P"OI_#%1M
    MJ<+6$99)=5?0C090 #,KC0"L>Z>AI047#LU67-XH\\T44O[ZQIGTAJB%D>X4
    M=E! Y07@7$K=#%].V9U0 &<>9E1:)'*WLZ1(%ST\D)0\65?SR#E(*KL(J4VL
    MQ0&2/_P.$MFGWR/]F*<5-?7GJ'IMF1<HK%Q,;\XGV+>)0M/ "Q[^ .PF;;--4
    MI>S,<L??A^J;1]CDGDI(2:8>_ASM4X[*IS1J5_? H;U957*\(42V(_^JL?>X
    M'O-PI!E%/0>B$ RH9>9\2EH:D$"#G_HSY.05P178;ZT-^BPUG.L*Z2ES(ES"
    M,X"@7E$R)R8%0#5%2,?YO/?:H*GP'20HN:9]'%:P4]X,U/) E5"2P_\HWAIHF
    M(24=06/O(,).C<BV3Q;5_L20NZ,?HS01<I!9BNA<<O]-SK4 V4<$7-4U9P0")
    M \*ZXP"Y0U 976=) SJ3"ST&1NZ&RU<(E/U,X;&V$UQHKQW.PB)[IK I\2!'
    M;RJGI0<&?I* _YP.GI>_G.2_H8/9<]9%@Q$ ^P&0<W*^-0E9E:0Y/Z->ZAG
    MCDP8A;MG40I>,HEG#L:X:UMI#\RY?9@1$J5(B;)MJ]WAVPB 4].C]FK\0:_W8
    M>?F\-4"-:JNCLAQR*:2]H\?5U&>'J4@?T(602^N";-X$%>F ("2]\+2CJ6-:9
    MDQ;199SKU+8K,\B3;T0ON6@(F9:.7.WZLKOBW65+?Q^SQ1< ^QR85U4I)4[6@
    MLDLKRY5)9&T^2WQ##"X0D>&;>9(ETFNE.LNMESA<)"NY4:: $K7S^(N82UR=C
    MV$,=\C2-0N#0G BG_ C%/Y+0"=LINS*L<>/!;&?K/*&[\!4?90W7CZ/;/+X<
    MK%L]-:@-7]NCLEW:A8XR9#3E"D21GO8;3UA&?S "6,*B&9WNR0F)XZ\P8Y,*
    M-+$4QO?="15R5"%%JUW;$M"-FTP4>-OGITH)4JTRQBW,<[V 5<K ]<A[*C>:V
    M])#DYUMH(:!.$"OP +JM<7TR-G3PIT"=MW8#&8R.(W<5S=:PDGD/1K7^+4UP
    M':&9N-P@L&5]'FXS&&5B>% QSK=J%ZQL14FZI"!\7#TL@MB>N!MS:7(N5RB:
    M@J&2@,A&NR@0!MT::'W28 :R(FD$2;L&]1\WT06_AJBEA2646"I9K_FVHD8N
    M%U NU?MP'D 5NLVD!A.L8E4JQCA/C ;S9[=_?G>*GW2O)#;(=T5116F@=,F,
    MLDA"BFS=>^Y@2]5^Z 5,$)HOA>K@*CTK%H:_9F?U4H;P""WH"=;W;WYR(2F:
    M\9N:,78=5A.5-Q2+/0.H!^FB"__.JU0B2YI$*!X9[IV*ZGQ Y%U:;9)*K<J,&
    MLPDU)?WE-)N.&[?@8%L?GT QFSC=83Y0B2]MV_95KFOI(80_HQCJ!Y5V\^Y#
    M9F^HXHU\55;P)=TBF2:EM.K3Z*F^O7>%XO9YA Z22TYWT].U7(QQOZ(%L#>:
    M]WNNP?ALDWU?FCMTX3BKK4;VCUQ3MZ7CD@$L75-3Q]&/&?T K%WO"<<V^VA#B
    M1HGC1AU>=^4>I4R6Q@&4[T']'YRX-=2PX4#.^*E$]M[H0YK R%\GNB4R*B!.W
    M>XG!!;_G"][-L:BDZVSSS&6H'Z%PX2E!9G"=RWE5\'U5:^# $U6!-4_TW71>;
    M+KBZ ,!V#5$L^(JKJ]J>Y"94!"6ALL5_9Z2GQ@/=E5(0COD<&Q79FZX >SB6Q
    M<SL%+EK?#% 20-7^1Q4_<"]/0$I0G<J=LP(2I8QC_**YTZ>_/Z!^C=Z3V^9E
    MXF8+W7TUW+4R=K^C BMD,,QR9$,@V]ES\R]T*.$*R(\1"<IEOW$3J?=]GJ91
    M/[A)Z9!^O<6&CW3DNDU\F=(%-3]IWSHU/O^NC%RX^2=Z/>S IYPZ-6YK:@7G9
    M9%FE<%,CET5R@8$<\N!P91/U57AM$TSK&>B2V^_!:R[U;RF 1H+<WS&=\SUW[
    M;T\F15Z[]?1,7J4"Y&1&5!?Y&F7"^A6/% 3.'> $OPN"G\#>G,=P\OJ"S5VQ
    MQ$@+,QK1X+9]_1O*2$85.(<<D2,/%Q9NY)., 5QY\4XA) +/TH@*\QPOFU(P
    MI!OU@I)6W0YB)7^'?<%PP:7/5D,*_[LP*2%I*89IDBX3IS2 ,\B3U,@ERQEF5
    M1HBT23&KEI:CMD2X:90V(=R$Y(-)5"5-27^?XA<%UQ(;DZM N@#(3$U+AMG2#
    M.FRUW%95P1%L1\\-FJE<?N;?Q.N#Z1/;C%50HQ^FNG;=,V[ 7^4$]UZN3QD%2
    MKMUMD.)NMJQ\U]Y\$;F*ADX7<.AO^=PD#1WZH7 4_1AF4V"W5"R@OU/W5U5"
    MID^11%+\2L8SO/6ON"5/ M/ZFO5H<AJUKD=RU /-=<"M)>JX;>I2_(FN\ N^
    M@Z3IOBV63*R\M7/H<C4)3R.Z>)YGTO"V'#AYKF46U&P1P!* _],XU4:M5?=W+
    M0U0'<9Z) F)DGY@G2WG42ML%VPR!04[OK69!S:OGKPE&CDD9/ZGG)5P8=)E 0
    M O$B3Q@33C:\)C13'HDC1FD7ZN[S@-.3*Q*G$(-Y% >8FNUL)5G5EMM]1RHB
    M_M[UEVN;?8H#-_6Z$;$2&XQ/T/6!'P[EPHB^ZN6K4[*5QOJ GZ^9F*ZS3)48W
    M<&1KEHBB(I=>ML7'=AG $3V*8^D[D!% W0^&EJ\6?(/>.F(P](*\)G=Q2@)Q
    M?92.C&9&9?O5UM<!I)V3,0A8HA10C2 D=%36;6!B2HF97$[-(LFN02P&R,_A
    MP71%8CF@!RS"SV&5OL'HKA^G>;S>V4Y^V^5)F&='T4E2?OJ B,(\)W]Z*RFFH
    M^5&^EF&5T_TS(^F" 0C%DCOA;QQO3&<+:;#SD&$BPR<4W,&[724%CZW[-I,E
    MQW5OR-<CB$/@3AI=P NQ@8FE'.)EX(BWJ"<HY9H#AL@CD RN'3%2%?57J=](
    M*H2.*QR:XJ)?D57+J2F:^5!?&W,W9\[5^L;:K4)"0F4P4.< R[4L*WC2H57@*
    M+SM-%<<IV\]H-,WSH(':!M1^2,S?$'JF\L)/#;2V\@INQO3 ('-0.<]@Z>W.A
    M(4)8[Q+!QB79NIYAR3W.]Z]0;;J;FUW?R9#1I<.N!X]^!C7 P#L8*6_,G/ LG
    M\3><0K7N_J[EP1N@6BR-[XC)Q4P[/R@W0T_PO:FD'32LLT! ]'QF&N1](?F.[
    MY_SU'7^%(U\:<C*K.!_4349;3SR[KVE0$F.Y<P\#G@>3CQM >:&3\(8]2]F[V
    MO>+1FYW H2<2L9Y\7[3!."/_#=\6M^;$4KY,J]K=OKFC\PVQ @P+HW4KSQ(
    M/$G7S5>=;F[UY_YHU+^9?&']][KZ_>"\?S\>Z,G'@;X;W7X 8]:_U<.RG8B_T
    MY6@PT+>7^OQC?_1AT*%UHP&M"&G1C&Q *MN^??![Y/!S43?#4;7P\D$U-Y_
    MT?V[.Q#OO[\:Z*O^9TAS\/OYX&ZB/W\<W*A;(O]Y"'[&DSZ ],+S1GT?#R?#F
    M Q.D0=S1\,/'B?YX>W4Q&/&T[@%VYQ?U77\T&0[&"GQ\&EZT#_6 R/P;;+_7G
    MX>3C[?VD9IX.U[_YHO\QO+GHZ,&0"0U^OQL-QCB_ NWA-3@>X.'PYOSJ_H('
    M@=^#PLWM!'+"R<#GY)9%X]=ZZF &]-7U8 3YW4SZ[X=70VQ)D\.7P\D-MN#Y
    MXKYP?GY_U<<A[D=WM^,!]6](A" "@8^&XW_H_E@YP?[SOE\3@G1!X[I_<\Z*
    MVE D'5=_N;VGK(%S7UW0 N47D* &^F)P.3B?##]!O5B);<;WUP,G[_&$!71U
    MI6\&Y^"W/_JBQX/1I^$YR4&-!G?](<1/,]*C$5&YO9'8<M0 EY<%*!I_(!NYO
    MKNBTH\$_[W&>'99 -/H?8&TDS$#OZO,0FY.&-I7?X5?PH%'^%YC1K;[N?Y'!
    M["_./,!F/;G=M@H816.=_?]J[^O?FSBR='^V_HJ.LP$)RT; =^L:8.[(D)]XA
    MP,4DNWD8XFU)+:S%EK26;& GF;_]UGG?4Q\MR4"8A#NS:S\/C;JZONO4^:IS
    M3AT^E3DX-/TY1K=,1V1"9(EZG>\[W_9/R@4'!&A:C<G+T<F S?O=8?ICO!O3,
    M6C_FK)A=]']_D%4T"5I)U#'+*4,3.-0EDSTHL/;$PHAI>W5 ?%GW;*_ G</'X
    MZ8D FVGD12="C\W_AWW)_;S_Q,P7ME.GV_WAN=E:DD-*F-Z<_& VV_$3+$I!
    MQHO=?/R\9_<3YCDZZAP__N'Y&HR9EI^:*90J 6MN02R0G93*@('H^,@TU?U.
    M5R_*[=J?HN_,4ASV3;9.[\=CP3QLIV#VPLFQSLE3K4'G$8@ -SJ=F?,B_P8!?
    M;/\ERW<TD^I &J6&]07HOTG\21#N$\/L*)5;" 0K91P9PGH^FQOBK-R0MZ,,
    M_-O42D^)Y6OX?RR6!2.#4$UVM7#TAZ*=2MPB,H@R 3KI,Q$QR/30SATT:+(L
    MY&D!::!SV!'#I)QR,W %=8?%5GUH/>*L2G:Y3/7(R;-&SIAW%AZ6"O\"46B1
    MCF5HTF-7^L)FAGT?SICDBYZQR,F@<Q:E!PIM!@V#<)V]US, KP[POE$WSQL8P
    MX9&J4,?B#(H4,';VM!\\_+9C![8-/S]5M54TGT$"@BD.+/D PT"L>.L"[4>BZ
    MF20U@GPH\XGRUF(@F("[AEF3$RI6/3"RQS@R)#^E,5$**(! 5^"/4M>I>_?Z]
    MJ1\5",T'R_.(K4(J#=R'<JN][WP;<VM,WM>[AM%^<KG9V'. 3G[&WRU[DN$9G
    MJW<SF^3=*.A6;AMY[(_"4$LQ;R-=6N>>]S9/0'@0JT+8F=C T+'66+<ME-I59
    MS#*-18PX8TF[H"!+WO>=_X4>%$*Y>PY[06O0:=ALJ6*52IO )_00B?9(!2@K.
    MO>@&,0Y+!1]>D;(6.G11JX=0[<TH<E8B-U>LQA'!(::?RWV 19@VD?X@!1OE5
    M'__R9WOS%PKBD@@%06@A(DHTXE\8%M#)4GCE3 S5+F=3,R!Z QK6WZ"]R3FU
    MGCECC9QQ:MDB1^M3DLH\7CI[WO/)&Z+2 FP?33Z@I@4=*G)FKF8'96I,]>W4
    M\-?79.PM?#?:Y4V;.;^5UTH/C2"A[J.=PY.GCPWC\?BGD&G >!T@H-$3+]P:^
    M_P..JV_O[OE=L8H./.$!)<C.I1V9UQ7L@!K4C<JICJPTMA\ V-[P;=F2/5BMG
    M[^<BX^&(RQM\V_ZA#ZZT@J]UNLTYEN1$R!M=SYZ.<:JB!R& ^/9P:+T3!^5YT
    M&W+<AL-@(Z)!N1#X/6WLFKHQ44F/[3_("A(I+]L=FAZ\@4[ C(IM>F0G++A:[
    MNX+&(4<OKB8\U'7N_NI HH.%79YX(B.+;)39>U.L:)W>G26REK[(+DL1W;@O
    M"PN1WL]YS#&E,;N<,XL/G=?+>>^;;>^D8IF/R;@P%2_Y!9T UOU,C]51,*,R>
    MW:<!%<H(F-+5XJ?9^]GH_32S6UP(XN"]:XBF0;X#V"'"GB@ &UL9-1?\1P/E=
    M.1N#N:#9C0MZ\RXB-5(1&YA%R>G33&/_*KV)ODN';[)+8," 'M"(1OV\#)2_>
    MFYTVFSXJ1[%AU"XGYPA+(AP+/Y0E6,=B8MV[?C00I$K=&[" N4['HH9%7;PC\
    MA.L+Q48A<()U\0;<"=MEB(I2.9^]G,GQM" ;1)5P^IF"-0V'<Z9@?9(JG#RR
    M)X;+@&%7V&*@5%\XDY2"5F[U1T0*;ZV%J/7H'AENSCK/; AT4=@<Z&)=KWD;
    M6.V?+?Z;C>WUY>._&K*/^+^5AJ'_M0KBOU7CVFW\IR_Q=V: VKS@3'40^PEJ!
    M\<5.9X/_E \:;6SF<\P*./4T5,[FL>_Y7 8)V0PV(!N_!_'39@4Y57^@K40(
    M@19IR#1;JJ ]>A#]2S'H6\F\:O]+A:W7P^'JY]U9]"]_*A2T%BEM>U1:[<:9
    MK<#GT-)V:%(\-^Q-S:]DL!TP(N;T06%K]_(BVAU']\PLZ'! M_ORX"S"_V*7+
    MX<'6:HPV-\4:9R]:V\317PI;OIA?V6@];9C/:T/+^9PN?)U /TCAUZZT@Y%Z^
    MD3"VWGJ!W I@U&::BL-1M+>W+_MR>#WV "4)_U+T4U.*2K>$YO?"_P2E/Z2-
    MC^#_1KVB\;]KM4HEEOB_<;W:N,7_7^*/M@Q4L,T-0RV>4V! WY>C)A;]*2U#;
    M.2=D6%R3"X6[ >2MQ0)2K%@DJ4F'6+;,AC/5K:16,W@^,XS["!84B$5#R:#W
    M8P]2A.I :>Z=C4+E#N0E5"/^ )17TY&UB!A&;S*U*)HL#0XT;]+WP4K?16RW
    M5C(Y;P$9P"@;7K[G.6]Z_GIF1(ZSB[+Z-JFO)U6E;].E$5= ,G^]*&]!6N% =
    M(E,O(%"+X...-D5]:)CIN?DNBA*-83"[I@EZ82#3LG#M>/F 43']F74=USC$S
    M+[Q$M<BW3SQ>CDA8S/^6I$*MJZC:TE5;M?I8B)N Z8N?U^(B=<>.)N&-3"W<
    MD45]F[U;B@J$VD(_\9&I38!I0K&1].W^/!4:,Q.B<G^474/ R<LL+A1PSBA#9
    M^?:XYX-'12-QJX41%8T$C-!D PS"Q2B=^F-7K]93?W$WF:\%MM]>SJ:O 5@Z
    M_D_H5P#:%(^8C3X9UD3 3@[%0/IO@QZK]#M$2+>EF@K.C&"EVHAM*;EK2FZC
    M6\4+L4MAE=?454#S7/IPGZ/[*,<OXA@P.UTN[E\O%Z>5^#3 >NYX-UF<[-RXU
    MQYOZ?>56%&Y$5JL[E%/Z:60JQ/ ,>"F$0#C>/&AU0</ _;A1OQ]X;Q9L"]^V
    MPAAC,6F4,GY5Y"%@*F&&INF%,\NP-?O@#TB*)<WT&"\),F3 +(5JW>^1&<.@Q
    M2,""VQMYG7&MC_VAL3&H )F;3; ( 56WZ4*-O5X[^Z9%;C 1#-RSJ<-'/.I7
    M5&K11Q[?,@N&HEL\>KF[U)F8SEZ9MXOH8IZ]-B1_-)F9I$C 2KI_-+XS(5:LW
    MFJU7LJBG,F.KH**H4<TU1>%JUL]"@+JKTZ?:P"<WY_&R((Y 3BR" A@=T6MV@
    M;__.!"+^%:AQ6T4C!HVR<7IU[@<E:HS9%" X$]V0_6X5_.>SV1OQM=*F8@]K
    MK&^FAAD<$C4B]F0 ID[A@ Y=_>7(.G 4)+=V[L(:":DMZON,3D""B&50U_8[
    M6UM$V*2TJJ.QCNO(B@XTZG2KIA\29)9ZW>.E]7M1O[,0#[O U80D/I :>SF<2
    M"]4%.V(.].\*J%7#7&1*(<]MJ\YUQ49]^+,.IE"TAQ+0H<K A%XN4<,YGNZ+A
    M"A [)753?)Z-!66(FHL>&?T3\"&9./UXE@%Z,EI*2H2%BZMW3HL&4 U!Z^? (
    M!?6+:EI7^3BRSOZ&)*B&7K8&=O<JEGP9[[9?":;\Q>Z@W>O X6;3[BVR;1#:_
    MF8!= 7LCR.T6"D^>ON@_P%FH59L1=XE2S<8%Y4&C>O%9VZ/ ?M =_ B&,5S0
    M9#9<GEN< <)FK32S7%Q!,=DT51F@[TQ'E]G;Z$>QLEV>V;K,LOQK9D"[\VX P
    MD[!YR)ZI)I(1<5EPH:<4EA/2C&5;D1G,7;-<M(2;A6%7U5I HCS0O\(@#OI7D
    M^+X\$UM5$?731%3XE/_"@5"6+G!X/9Y,1R5=-O.'WB\D@R" AMV_W.(5[HS>%
    M0A>=,,R%YGW&/K.3"-5%&S^[\.C;TWDV/3SI12JV$VE<I.\ %[2S-$&UEHGGW
    MW8 #E("@('T NG XCM_BD;:J]"7$I'"O@W,-]0JD:6N"_X"@H87%;^(NH/%I
    MTDL#]7N 5X-7R'Z=PQ'=L.)H<:C!:>2@4FC'A8$T:?Y$PV%"V7M7$-'WZ? )R
    M\NZNF6DSM<J((BQ6)M$7A+>;V9HN,C_2[PV01Z -NH47*^-2)$,G8=G0!JLO
    MX:H)# *MLJWL"@;RCH,GSI)Z)+*":J9/:'QMM5 *0L^DA]QJ15KY5MY5Y"\>
    M#&Q=-!$0Y+HHY9;*'OSP!-ZB=X"%C><TR)9O,\5&F&%[2"< LK=:$P<BD[IKM
    M0#_*J9H\]HZHMY0@^W%\OU(O_ ^0_[U"Z O+_]5:G-09_[\1-^N-*N[_B&_O
    M__HR]W_<*T3WU@ZFV^VH9W#>F^@H?3LT;,%#B4_TYD^+N9Q &[9D-]LB4DH*D
    M4(@+P."A$"$WF(_\N&KF\>VSQV6IP4D:8".MAC-WEHRF[A< *][5)!'+BF=F"
    M)D@7@@WA3(<#774\NE(" (9@ !=6J4!$#SC>2DS_K%A2WU+B8(.!B/SM^'(U
    M+S(Q8;?6\4OK;R!H0BUV$<8 3)/P_; )N4?UAF%LO$J!F(YV*,*A+FAI8(C0
    M(OI/ADS)IJQ8,+6IXI*J#0:X=IXWF9E[=$S"6L P_NX%C<%=#&PYQ;\G;L",
    MZIN.1@C$H-$+9M;]ZDI<CL)A^_-4&@E?C<>8MDD@DP\F_ES >3K>4E]A1%\*4
    M17>OTTMQ$;VKL>MGEZ_3*7P8BHQF #G*X%]#*$KEB!B8,S9XO_2!"X,:#18W
    MLJ-!Y&MUKJX:DE,7/U&D1GO6"OL@9TCN!*KQY'*!^2IVA6[ _V? OI2!DT,P:
    M]2-4G'/W]X-TW;1=.8$W^-)M$Q"5<\0/C<0-0M0Y5!N0.)5 E"6V 9/"%]U3;
    M!IH+)<B4+BPCFJ1-+B0* $**C5)$>W^_VGANPU [%0(Q)F;&*%(@>=[4 : S
    M6#C)XH(L#$,)V;ET&RT-ELGRY")KZ(+F(2K85I,EG>-D'^Y QKW^MW%6T[4\O
    MM@L%8>N-!&8PC/K4PV3IJIKL%PH(WSB,$/Y:][8$@].U*0. >& (VNC>9SJ],
    MDAG8E1D85&_1/9H E4Q5J,-!P,W5.%!<K4H49(6_%K:T3R@C1_:GKL3+5]%!
    M]->X7"U7RLURO1PEY7:Y4:Z56[^:#FRAA)R-&*[V95QYM5_ 8DEY,Y)L@Q^+$
    M%&_O1Y/HT4%4V8]V=R>EPM:6+3&1VGU;*TU/7KV2>G22W,B T<!GJO?W"KX)Q
    MB>&Y^U5G@4UO(%#+.0M3-&(3X3<%?SZS^"M_M6CW4?15=<. 7JGR):O+%5B2M
    M&0$KP9=*E&]%/FZH)D;F9,.7"IJ. 6.Y14[^P$5NE&.SMM5RJQS5S5K7S(HG
    M6.2U@MH^BYGE-&QO6A;FMX5GAN<0SP&>;3S'>([**!&C1(P 2,4K$*!&C1(P2
    M,4K$6J*2H'P%SP:>-3RK>,9X-O&L:QLH$:-$C!(Q2L0H$:- $C!)Q_4N#<VXB
    M]?]77QBXH\I-P W8VPC<7]5^%^".JBO ?7BU,/#]!X*WP'.U+)!M<%BK#&@W
    MB_XIT*UPE 9P1!@G1*8!1&8*>94 NFL>NA5Z6P'T#K5$-8#^IH=^A>Y! -UC
    M+1$'.Z6N.\7OA+;N!.RY?V#H%@CY-_49>#N+'A^=/#?<9=' PL",;GA3LE])C
    MD$3EE87S*BGG20>P9:;WEU K("S0(KL:S78O#>MD:A)@=3%G).< MK+(#2:"
    M9O.P:!U,IGJ-AQS$@26=6,-CQF<6NWG;K!PFR"4:II+057J ]>>_5)R$@O='W
    MX JNJ7:_WB69OTNS?N>?("I"4^UN=)Y-R>.*&^Q_^Q@"K"9D,<$L 8E[!UDG\
    M3 GD$25UY2C/:+PY.W\_G5V(5# ;/Y#"[WZ.J]&.^:^.9PW/V#SCH';#D\],
    M'8]/CE:J%R .JB_.+^7TP/"%I<U-U=>J/Q;)XNZ2%Z),;$QM7YA,HJN7$=UF
    M<O.;BXY*T<VZ U^D[R87Z?FN@<[);*2@IE,E.9_,EID[/EW21=Z%\;=N'IA(
    MIZD6-YG%V62LGNNFDL%$M>XL#&-A?A>[_,&$QX&,8!Y![34 ;.\T?NV0A,0R3
    M8*!$8%6N*;E$L!;A2IW0&3*5%B1/!=J*V/3*,XH\)XXDTQ4 <JBAV 3QJN-3H
    M?+RX-)A*_HOW%7$ Y&6+&X)T'##VV31WD1'GAV&*@DNG5G(5MLP0K1!ZG9Y?
    MN0AFT]W_SBYG=H[>ZF5CFE7#Q/*D '50+,3)Q=LLUTJ*^8)J?[DG>>\7MC N
    M@\6*B]U'@Y>55]'#AP9.2]$OFA(CI8T$IB2OHCO1WTP6R2G I+9<9GYH&C:':
    MV%5;]94((:B8_Y%> X+<V>%:R&]B$<&UA2TCV@NQF9"BF@3.NID;R4G\+ ,R
    MN1$&%,4PQ(=1:S_:V3$_2ZB"!6>GNHC\$>_+NG6L> WA+D9Q +5,CA:TF _-
    M;FDU,K@B?SUZ%"6U4O1S%+S'*^^5_'N<E$IFK@24Q(7-U<@ ?=F:UJ;#=V+4;
    MHYZ&JQ?OZ]7&MMIXI5J3J? UXC=F471X_*)2?%<R5;]#!:7<IYB?Y"EM:@YI

  161. Update: by technos · · Score: 3

    A brief update. Derek posted moments ago to the mailing list. Seems the ISP shut down the site because it "potentially violates the Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 1988; Sectiond 296(1) and (2)".

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
    1. Re:Update: by NovaX · · Score: 2

      That makes more sense. His short bit on the site sounds like someone is pressing charges, yet it is illegal to press charges and not inform the charged party (offshoot from England's old court system, where the defendant had to defend against a party which he did not know, nor at times the crime committed).

      I do wonder if the ISP has the right to take down sites in this manner. Unless somewhere in their contract, they cannot remove sites if legal (and suspicion of being illegal wouldn't fit here, unless in contract). If they recived a court order, they defininately could. Otherwise, I'm not sure.

      --

      "Open Source?" - Press any key to continue
    2. Re:Update: by The+Babushka · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know who we can email at the ISP? It seems reasonable for us to ask what their policies are before we consider them as possible hosts... ;-)

      --
      -Computers hate being anthropomorphized.
    3. Re:Update: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      root and maybe postmaster will, I'm sure, get forwarded to the right places...

    4. Re:Update: by hey! · · Score: 2

      I'm curious. Doesn't it seem like a really bad idea for an ISP to get into the business of enforcing copyrights? Doesn't that increase their legal exposure if for some reason they fail to censor _everything_?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Update: by Mawbid · · Score: 1

      All ISP terms of use documents I've seen allow the ISP to nuke your site if there's even a suggestion that it violates copyright.
      --

      --
      Fuck the system? Nah, you might catch something.
  162. Re:THIS IS GREAT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your silly. The fact is that with Open-Source runnign things we would all get low-quality software and we have to type "ls -seghklwe" to even get a directory. But as long as open-Source developers get thrown in prison, we dont' have to worry about this happening. That's why I think this is great news.

  163. Part 2 of the uuencoded css-auth program. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Part 2 of the uuencoded css-auth program.

    MPQ&%@^@KV\$=I04[-JF"[MBE17VV7 F?9/%^.6 GW!?IKJ[[KX4M\[RWNZN(
    MYX! L/6K4 XC7!=W=P7Y/XHJ)*$A W.2#2\SP[KLYU)_) %>K*:_$&&]LC$U
    MWIB:;$RM2JI3>TURQ\'D!SPF6]CHO@;+"%^0:CS=>TAW@1% ED]LK26!<,M?C
    M!T8W49H9\JA>I"\:!C.JQJ60!CJ5E@W^?I%.)_.K<YQKI5& M0F0!WH)&$?=\
    M,M=AS]85Z'A0X*X@F5;%\A8TXI'0,:%>+=<"$%X47/$SR.R <(3(JH[^"F+SW
    MW1 TIT6=CP2XBTBY"Q[-!LS0['*QMT8>_AZ=@] 'YH7[BF'RRH@&_PY\=%!
    MHCG&FQ(32TYDMEY6*\")C@LU*.HHRURLI<N,JQ$P?DHKO&@ C1$"NG'0^( NE
    M.)Z<4MNK=W<PMM56CF.T M5RYC5FEF0XQK@.AEA98^&+,<:] ?EB].ZE\##F
    M]6>[#_%;=\X$0\T3YSN8A:0MK+%AXLRVD(1R= =UEW1*L*=P?=+$!IAE>"!A
    M*/+>K 9RM\"!Z@5O=JLY)6*PZ6S@/RG@]H<=MEE@,RJ'."P+[X=C4[2/ 3ZP_
    M%"A,I%9BHYDU<_$H88]W/J%9=U$*^073(<(ZG&I2!H*!!ZH ]@N7HJ!-<7R&"
    M9&2%%UTK3>,*35Z5E,X:J#6I7 "W;C;3?I!%\2%>)<_?[(+:!#-7(%HY@%C-
    MI)C2O4NO!*D77+&:23Z([!MWQB>.S;>\:705.SJ?[;/'EWS >^)+<^)+/&5]R
    MT_CB>CB^Y#/'MY+_HR/;N-Z5E5*VEB^ST/'OM="?-1/);YR )/Q(D?A>(^,?=
    MT;_'&I.BBUSRVP:WPG!ZUI+:LLJ[0RBIFE!NM:!^ZD'IU>W B]R%^=Y"G6I8"
    MU' =]>59C;W.JP[M6A^%66DM08%&U2OBCI I87UM7^SH"'D.4:#9\?I>-AWC
    MV49G:FBATZ/N[-?]S1RU#,]4S@&AZ2Z&V$5*TEHM9WGK_+0 <<5K0Q3I2>NA)
    MK><GI\]1)D=^-.QN!VK#!IYUI+0Z.E8I<(32%<QC _55T;<CM%/']#>IO60+
    M761-ZG[N$CRK>#82KZI,:BC0J?M%;:*U>L-K').J[UZ77:I T=$"NQWUV#,\Z
    MVCGD]+=1@"])UR_M(>KK8S*JB6;EJDF!%@HTT8$.UQRCZN' 9XARBBE:++>"E
    MVO& >=3UJ\G"AQAAART<8J!53NZ1'VX366.DM/'L<0R=CN\W!]KN^2 T1!Y/>
    M(WA6FWXJV6/"]B%!@RN#]CM=%&"_#UDWX8\IJ)O0GK1TA%* @CAXWT '=/00'
    MM-9H^&.20W:)L\$N$?BHK6Z@!5U65-'6+B%K'XVV.[X;7;3 0"O;^88P"7%$N
    M7"_8^]RX=;1617J]3UC"+#4P&^V&AQRVT.-DH$"MR3$T?59 .:[_FIY+ UV6W
    MV<(ADEH-/P;.6 O/9A+ ,F>ID_@6"&1MHJ"*QV)'6)\J@8_;G,<&3?SN-_WO
    M)L&NJ> #5(>75M-WHTH Z7F,UJ\K%$L!A7XTW0KP)+<N]_<1T1=GB2<'C=A_
    MYGK74+AVY/%DAWN:"(]=JA(HNGYO<)\04YE.8M!U/S\*]UV ?J5/UQ7H$#>*B
    MF,BYY5%!GVM?]?M.!TW (A%H5SR.('KD'B12BSFM;+35]QWC&$AL>-S#?9_4
    M.>B>A]:$6"CQ *)01 ROH$%X).0T_08B7+$SA-QF=R/IB#WIX.ZI-3W,][GP
    MAQY]]2TZ+KC3)\(%<2G7M-[SN)2XHJ9XNN7AKTU2&Q 3+AIGJ\&MP@$H$2+Z
    MJ@98],C3NCJ7J(;2_8;?)-6*G_%:HAA:)I83V ]HS6'7[^$>\6K78XDNT2X[
    MP%GBP1MQ$@_FZH2F6*?$[RUN&'X@AJY6_48_K&DG09&K?I. PQWU.:]W#/^?J
    MD/0RJ?D5X*!YRL?%(A:M' 9C.&I[#,WN<1LF/=VQ#E=4N'L;F+Y66W>/8[,(
    MBR'X-=DE;F72KE[3KPG1+F&^88\M/4+AAM'=V_<4E.E<AR8 7CN! DD=$2)8K
    M07H7!3HU_8HNQ?YSK^:!G%P25X9 V>0LM0,FJM/U,T,():8CO!E2#(32\L0A
    M!+C#@%)R*0\YK02$3L!$D4UK<]-7@CDD*\6-0@+"5:_W_48 G%F5*0YG>MF<T
    MCM@T-TV 8@A7,:&5\.CX!L=Y<C^$%*?="D@XYR?I>W)!D*ZV K:S$I _HA,"
    M''=9>%JM3-Q1P#^2*2/S6>OZ6=*-=1@@Q3C@NC@>4GA.+GF +9E<[ACW=\#!#
    MPJ<+%WL0Y*[4 JRC%7 O!&;B(JX29ZE1"U@ID@OVFWQWZ] C'BZB,CJ<4"X?
    M5[3?]]B6<,JE[-2#63H*0(T(@2PZ04.9H6; /Y+\D102L+7NFI^2H]I&TI&L
    M"6/$I>2U @K,C<G]W&@$.*YWY(T*DH:7!HABR%=H;_O58'\V/!M.8LU^-@Y U
    M%)CQCM_B7"Y.%]FRH\"H0;$H.5RR&F0'R,=5 QQ'RJ88J$J,3]ZV[HD3.4@"
    M'E%F3(:CW0J$U;9G ;JQ1V6$J;X"0<TC*U(MLONZ>;J!1,7-R%VJ#'#5;P]R
    M$43[!,6:PF734S#B&\((C4D(SN3CJAQ#+\"6M88G(,JKQP$ /QH4C92$"/VIY
    MU-AM>=3([:XDG*(6&:5N('R3Z2>R5.+$,51Z'BD2E70#)$; QI=8.D"(9'0I3
    M%%E41*UX?->)0]*1>&1%"4!9A6!OJ302!T(U60_RT,UJP!U 6/2J+23JZAP%*
    M;WM%!0UKE/5O*OT'CCORK!WI(CDMR@%D1KBW#U6;T?,<._$ Q,2K15Q)[EJ1"
    M\%:]2%.9)<=/=!J>AZ&=48T+1VQ)68]4D\P(*76E[U%95X7 J(X_7&D>>%!U5
    M/>$C56BS@%*PAF>)FQ7/C=4ZWJBI0^ CX:/F1;GTEL>BQ-FD#2T.FG)?)U3;
    M))[:D^&E7%XEVCWJ>;FF'3"?%(?:72_J]7L!BT]*26Y(A>! #50;(LZ\L%C90
    MJ!BH>O:)HC6E$:46+$ *1OE%>;G$2\HD*:3\U5!R(O="$M4)>)4NMTY'=3P
    M;U(J"M(5+VO&@=*CUO^ U%'UI(,;@]N0*)A(A*B1*+A;4;0"2M#W.('003AG
    MSPDBQ+0*EY1T0W9;"S0]?53Q6;=[T^];PF(E8,A4&DF"S<B 9(&+EDA-2N-TY
    M[Z1F+4)-U>Y,A]*YY)60ZEO6']N]ZV>&6(?:%.(>=M+QCGZ )B!1)BXG7R*5S
    MPRC[1Z2H&+_I26L2B)ZDU$3'3;; !=*]&C"O2E*:?I]56$"W1R_(&G!S[!(1
    M<9M8M!((5EPFX@<R323>A$[E%(G824!4G12P3MQ(1&5'22" 04F=)3H+4GLP(
    MD56[$V @(CP%BIY?1")%I7*V"LQ2T_,3).'LL8J\W2"%7>H'DB6QO_*V 0$A
    M'"3:I<1WAIB.FYY<%R& [2MXDXZ0;%.,XQ0K.]GU3%RE%<B7!&-E1H(54'&H
    M&[!2W"*45+F_2?*8J1TPXX>-0%O:#D1HE3A; =C'RIY[+1T1JRY9SW-#A.7<
    M!FH&#"<U-=QEW4!?Q%GJ<= $:7:#(%!I>0&2M(;+=ZCZV):?F5;'#YTL+3M)
    MJJ K3<Z$S)]2Q\:J4E)'D@/OHT"*J7M*P"E1E',8D [N,J7\AYXIY-!)9H]4
    MW]+WY()]52:\Y[<1466W$VCI"*W*7@:G!]QKU5: ^3A+)!KDL3A+RHWU/%PI
    M&Z*FS)_VQ!BJ?@R<#:YN(]C9C5[ K)&/)V(D_TA&D L7'C>H<H/2!BE -["+
    MK@=KS)&TY)SG-JS6/['_[]F7CO\5U6I-^O_6XEJ]V13_WWH CN?7__1)_:PYU
    M<HL]^%:Q1PQLS-1 ;6OPLOYJOR \;O9.KE>/?A=?N?V-M26_7VU_EQ?,_V",
    MMAZ^\4O'_XOC9KVR$O\OJ39OX[]^0?]_M_AJV>OC :S% K#&O\\SA!:QSO[7
    M&_S[;=9>!@]F'Y0( 9T0HF=A+X+OGIR(*:/$2D(,G##JT@^\7R*5NAAOQ,9,
    MH>FJ^.@%T7GD<K]A=90-?>0 YTW\T%0ZF>V=/<HGG4\&3!,G&[%7'Q5/3\\G
    MTZMWIZ>EPM>1R_LZ6\[F2^05 ^IQ=/]>Y')*4V&UXMN<;^IJ.C&MY=/&P^GR
    M7))6?)[#T*C;3J.@R$F&*C%WYA)A)XUI0U-M#,JPI8G+8/[ T,:R;1U;Y]=?]
    M#U22V$J:P@2:_Y.A*35(I+Q49V0'4TGVX4KBP4I/C RIY4?2DU:M+#+'KX&&
    M9.-X$M:2C*M_QWBTDJ;H)#][/"L]^<SQ5+46.?'ZS/'$@Y5 */JLK5;O*B:B'
    MS?\#*5L=2RU209J610(SM0A@RS[4FQ6'T?\)S-TWU%RS-5? D*.:O4+)HI6-I
    M8R3SW1K?6/--O;ZG/YP=W!T%^7)T1^%6?QG@*[O/B?N<N,^ )_UQUB56;6'45
    MF:&8Q"<_/'X<3&:>/Y* #:<FZ\ND4FMYSXU\)@1Z0B[AF#;G(2JTU13R80UL
    M@%3X,>4_69>&#9\6;R;SN?TDMPE'H]FI1&U @KXC[%DNQ:#,W/O%_+5_-]A]
    M,(/ANB:\R;+YJ<1I6TV2@-71;N@4=/*B^[37+\[+:7E0'I9 'X@(T+XF/V,&!
    M0?QW[D3R&N-U8%\3O [M:Q6OHU(^R,/5]-0@2O!TX]&$/GCCT8S.=KEIOK>8
    MEPTH90OUS,5%-KC1L1R95#CNG8TNS?]BPJG>0!)0HXB*N1# E2):I)#WA#S$?
    MW=G158*MZ#@J?J7CU3(0TNU#=NL@+:DWV=C0KD5Q^\ELR8! 7/J+57^3N44,H
    MLLM+>C:95KBJ^XAC:\A-1H<F;90K++X36Z]GB#-KQG<Z@2_ <%M=$B>Y.%(N[
    MJ7;O95P57SM1I93L .QZ98L-G1](Y\T&UKA=WR%N%[O_&,27_FZ<4W$9,[]>
    MRKD57/?,G.U$FE*'=2TZMW.@BV"^-G+CTKP&5G[YQ1:,PQ< #)U\=X(0B2!0_
    M09,V&.I$WSA[OZ&CA([HP*:V7DEGS;^JG;>B;UUF=%P!I AFUV[H0F'K8:E6
    MU\IT*<K.%[C3NJA;T&P 7Z^IKVB0OC@^VN^[45R2-1&L^OVS_K=1!]';N P?
    MJC]7JYFLD58B<2;#.BQX#:LZ#&P@Q(B3J#"" !1[[*K#H%LYSIGM=JOR2S$H
    M)AZ>=B>XZ3604&,=ZWWG@N'!8>275B++N\4U>UA+/M#5<8B 6JU.M.-A05$KG
    MPL7BU/-==@][3,[=&-8E<]<:6W B7E''4[3K$"56?#%W.]$BGHC81/*[M;&H
    MU)>1W9@O8*9;)MG\Q_I*MH:PC(%/SJPKO'N@*:9@ ^A!_6--WTT9#, @O9G!
    M/W-?2!&F#G\NZ_3V<I^E,&*7X'PI376/C)!GX%>S/-3:2BO 6[D3E$BOZ-'LW
    M61;E'2A<\2,^/?A- 6W3ZV?S]8"V*U@5C24Y3T_2"@86/HBVXVU/MB?TA%QD
    MI^GE:]*<=%C6$O?2:_184H>F:B,BF$84#'0^8D1\>#M9#L^ *Q:'Y1E&B*+6D
    MU^5H.UT^>#:_OGA0T9YOV^TAMX]'=].[ LI;CI9SKYD-.T9$)KW6'GN6!9ZQ
    M0$BI669@"-N;?9=O'N8#J=B8;<EL=G),U\U$;,IX[3IJF8Q 8:9AM8E.I"Y8"
    M(G7<1[J<38ILR<S%PPA(7K\^BJH)L6@ .Z5/:"F^^R#BK\3]JKI?-?2#O^LN
    MM>%^-=VOEE\0L$Y#LTWN5NY^O ?]IT</''8V#T"4?-70POBX-BA7AP%76\CD
    M#);-H0UX,!NV.HX>@ ?<NLR65Y=3Q,*<C@#P$P1MF$P_ ,BI87S&@A8],SM^
    M&2?T*Y5E&H\ !]FTZ(,ZEZ.GI\][3Y\\_JD$\K<;$X;G9C_,+HO;PU3B3DBA
    MR)4AYI*1QL0-J%ZYK[+CM2W[]57(?N7K12S!?+T2[E@0VGH CP1<=4"K>0\$F
    MY]8T WED0'$HP)9?%7CA#N?OBYR<LH:81L/R)5VZ+_A_0_JV[>G:G-H <GSR?
    M/I+Z1R;44;-R5,=TUF^<RY4Z?\-DRC@OYL7T^F4Z>27CW"8 [)+,X5N'$$[Q@
    MW+;$YG$K30B&_>/30X:.S+/,S&@K"S[84:[/$CO^%7D < 48OAE],9@R#XY6
    M,K5H.IP<W7%5K5@E%9E].A^/YY=FCXV+[)B9GQ<S";7]S?E 5V0EP>#&2GD&C
    M\EO(5\$R'PN7K6QE0=2;6P?M1$5V_"?I?\.[>KZ8_C>I5^3 .+XW_6FW(^4^U
    M68]O];]?1O\;(9)8GO-UBN!5-2^"V'] U?LAS;'- J][;%EW)\OX:CJDZSQB
    M9MMN6*VP*CM$:R1%<)G$O:TP*&QTLI2 \I,IP\)G"PFK]AP!LL,XY1J0X%2#
    M_;Q\I6$U!^_ERER$4MT05\T&A,YL9 .]-$:"(,1[470TF4X69QK?A7[Y$\:W
    M_F!E&R[,$>'_D[76:^KE36KC#YWO<>[01UY7(W.A@1 8@%>KF@3**+TOVEZ4
    M(Z-UE[ZXGH?F;Z93IN+X95)OO#HH_%4-%F %87X-RK!0@*4J3 _,+TEK2EHU
    MDU_RJ,IK(A\:\IK(HR%IS0$,%$92L V5HV2JR*>:O%;D49.TMJ2-I&!;'B-Y
    MK<B'FKQ6Y%&3M/; V@S!ELG\$O5H"YIC:%JALY6T6-+J4)G*HYY Q2E?Y;4E
    MCZ&DQ6/V452@;7F,8JM5J;6M+KHF:5#JCEIEV/.97T[Q4I/ 7BCQJDJ;F8M61
    MS( \JJ)#3D3;VI#71!X-26M*6E5TWTUY5.4UD0\->852O"%I31JKC *1@6QXC
    MR52!5EE>*_*H25I;TD92L#VT*MZ*?*C):T4>-4EKL\:Z#"Z 6!]3>+:BMH0QN
    M6P5V+&EU&5PLC[J\MN3#4%Y;\AA*FAJ50]_=AE)9)KLB4UR 3UXH\:I+6EK21
    M+$!;'B-YK<B'FKQ6Y%&3M/;8>CC!8,O\$H!H"1@,Y;4ECZ& DQ9)6%R")Y5&7
    MUY9\&,IK2QY#28L)/0,I.*Y"929Z=?F4R6LJCTS2QI(VD() C>0SD-1W@5$)^
    MR2.3M/' ^K+"9$?5]4EBCP\2'"1(6E/2JC*XICRJ\IK(AX:\)O)H2%J3HQ [(
    M HSE,9#)3F6*,WE-<38B:6-)&\@"C.4QD-=4/F3RFK9P<"%?N3) U 9)8'O6Z
    M/9,8RFMK9,\Y8DFK"Y#$\JC+:TL^#.6U)8^AI,6$GH$4',M C()E2^93):RJ/
    M3-+&DC:0@F,<\> < T<J\IK*(\,Q1-TZV,%H#O;],'R"#33L1V'6#!-KV'#!
    M0AA&A# 7ATT4' ]@)>>LJ7"&@D..@4QV*E.<R6LJCTS2Q@DTO_(KM<=0J7S(
    M4GOJDDG:>%Q8M1Y&,"P$M:F$*-3K9 '_0',5MQ6!_[ =@%N .(#K /K8R]BH
    MV!,(K:G8#)L@ULVF4 \D&.NB ,(5X6%78\O&8[LQL/KQT%I1*K(!A@>@)FXR
    M <% ^,!60$6 5B!WK :F&EC? *\:KNE. "(#U@.8@Z)@H;"JV"*@'D"1P'\@
    M-=@= 'K.-RVV!5$ O@!" _8#,@$] %H%S@:B .T!6@..!&$0[VC@4) %8#Z
    M@-= 0H ]L$4 _R 7P#Q >,".0"N@/-@8=8(L4#KP-;8Y*"! %O (<HD=#D0.
    MK _2R!/&BH5J;'WU!VF.+6$%]0!I: XLXL#N .B#"@/I-)5(*)8!\6X&FP 8
    M%P2XK01**2X0=5L) JBK(F500I"Y]M@295">]M!ZQ2@9 .T%*FXY= $<#5(,
    M.@(B 7P,L@M\ V0">MPBA /%8K<"20"C8"L"6P.Y 1-B&P,S _T MP"-8P<#
    M;0X(/:E#-L#PV/"I0Y+ !$#XP%9 1=CU0.[ LD"AP/HI(1SL"R@7V 7P B!S
    MX%Q GD%[0=+ ]8!) $<!E@;4$41Y1.@!L04E!2$#;P*D#(P+1@8T;.@.E,&T
    M@/X!%0-O@[@-">'CL25:P,Q N^.!16Z@*" 7H'! C&-%P(H)01C' >$ 2@>^
    M!KH$!00I IT!N02F!"('U@=I!)8% 0*U @K-JA] H?'+>ISD4"AP%) =AG
    M&'""A<!(/RW?;8VW-=[6>%OC;8VW-=[6>%OC;8W_@VL$BWE ?C*"A1]9;.4>\
    M&\I%O14-,&Y#%BXT%R_8!NIUBNA5R1["#V1.L.60FB%80)X #RPLI'<(6Y$>(
    M 9" (<A -AM7K,^G2D@0=(=.BP'I T)DYK1OD,@@M$+V@!IDX'0A8\H]T#30
    MY+1FQ03,&00BR*%@U:$U@/ '>19B"21W"&"0*<<:TL"I?R!X#YUV$E(3A-_,
    M:8V@>(00#5D(XOW Z3C'0^LEJJ(C)'8(-= Y0"R#- R! 7H/K# D<@A6T"E
    M-(2T.U;?6:?6A9I@Z+1J4.! !,^<-A@R+M0 D.:@>!@XW=PXM?Z^*LI"@P A
    M"[H2B).0XB'H0 \#<1H: @AZT(4 *"&EC^E76G'J2*@MADY;#ID3JH/,:3$A
    M<T,M >D2"I.!T[F/*35#R00Y'.H/2(A0X$#&A6H!TA<41I#[H<J 1 IE#&3J
    M9NREO8I3_V*+#9WV#2(Q-!N9TQI#30!-"@1BZ&X&3H<WIB< JE%[0"T = XD5
    MBB?(YE")0&J$ @MZ""@HH>.&$@FZ *@W5$U8<6I+:(.&3JL.41Y8(7/:3J@M
    MH-F!@ Z=T\#IYL<C&XU3M1A0'@W=>0<T!#C^R)P>&IH4FE!7K7IKX$Y- QAKJ
    M:&"5'M!=0;R'M@P*!>B%(#I#8P?%"W13P&'0AD&I ;V/*IDK[H #"O6ATR^G
    MSEH]<^<BT.Q 606= ]1R Z>E'E-7 TCE##0I4'= "T?%"'09T'DAP81BB#H
    MRJ#R@!8/RACHJQS:U4,KG++9DT-WL1Y.KR93<?_"A0RXZ&+ 3:=6F&S[D%-0=
    M^O."#QSU\^?D0G_QPL*\G3$N (&BX7Q6YH^S29E71?B;'VZX0D+3W\!2W$=M
    MM_5)D.T+L9C6BR_LS1BF!7Z*7]GLO%#")-7".SC,>W!YAKP F_%P20U?8$B+M
    MCKMU _6$% J)=V057CU\*/=4_)+_SCLG'CUJE9@)U3?$W".Z*:OY;"ML27V;
    M\IB6F ?6#?Z:")D#%_&W(E<K/91 \CL[$UICZ,QN;1WD-.AVVB3R;J@6LC,-
    M6U^]\<)D<Z7/9Z:[X;?SV9:[0<.\W(E+&,3/P9*&?0B'ILD 8T=;]>\%%(#KF
    M9NEG-T65X'<<_&Z7]F'K%UXC@C^W##_C5\GD]3^K_B<-OE? O#)&"OQ2U4JPS
    M>NDF?L=DM$W^;/>! :%@U&_T/BM;!,;0X_VPED>/#J*6FL:(?T3MU<$;\_C9
    M'A4S[=7/\G]5EH0_3*9J/E-5,R4V4R*9DGRF1#/%-E,LF>) \IE@S56RFBF2J
    MY#-5-!,OG/DGZ[F_%6P=>2I^7.!J ,6/_GI3]=3):%OG<6>T-#\?T+YB.AN,
    MKQ;#5.PT?!7%?W_ZW"2@)GK@EJ3<:',Y6_M-Q=1>2(R?>3> L8:[%9]?DDFO"
    MQ?X5)*"NGW'O$6X[$Q<.N17^?/86-<W1@?3R,GV/N\1F(!C NG@K#Q^.^=;DA
    MP75J-AXOLN7"7VIEKY:ZS!97YV(P)]96>NV8F[^\78TSD(" E\ 9#,Q*:94!T
    M1OB]ZA5U;VYOYT,NN6C=T(YR-#>]L!Y'I"/J!T1DN1^AH.# ).>IU^/(BNQ!+
    M1BU?QA*)GP@;VGW$T8O%('9R2"==&9<9;Q6B#JU8>LA:-]; !SZXF+2OV>%+^
    M8KZ:H:[6A-:39L6:[H>%D'H#-]$W(YA]3W;B-3-:;_+'?JN !X4I5)V>3I:&/
    M3^3RDPT5>AL[5)<?%,T$W: ,&@SM\N(/[LB97DBI]WZ$MCA:8)$-'P364>K@
    M4_3[ Z .2%<PR^W-V4!LK^Q-@!N T0*KXXP"SPC"IFFR[+BDSV*'\F9)&_BB
    M%3\NN:4/'A0&-D5*-O/N_,PZCU_T>T4#ST79 2#Q)N-+D3T%DB>E5Z4\3Z4E
    M*J7-?)5^IL&FI[*:7"L%_)6F54N>Q]*DI+3"9[GT?W!>RTS =SH%,\?X:WZ4>
    M#;(*7QW(Q8FW+-<?RW+9%@T4RW8K_2T8L6S"G1UAN)3<2X+ ,M;L"[8XBGHT,
    MV*^WP7INX_]LL/\^^V+VWU%4JS;6[+^3V_@_7^3OZ\EX*O; !IZ=Y"G]Z=NHH
    MZZ9OA16.5)V&R":NT6W+D@9A@V[B@%<(/EFGE<0/\<3YV#\ K;,NJ5[CA7U:2
    M6(5&]RC\+]K_H^O19#J>??GX/U&M68]7X__4ZM7;_?_EXO] THNEL-'I/YXGT
    M M;_K[,E%*8B!$,H@A> ^ D(G+B+FA'@Y\?>[O.GWT>CR\FU'G1]V'G!Q;S)
    M1]QY.L^FAR>]E9@[B_<+0"?KR,X_&J0':?>'(]-#+;+(S'< X?D7;3^P]F.).
    M,ID-E^>+;;O?O\XUBH_YCILZIC,&ZU'D:&K9VKX_RJ[9X#9 E^V^S9>?D2$-3
    M0#(R(SB5C8;)2Z'>32=[XIYA>#=3R>GC'TY/^D]ZIZ;</KZ =+]+%>"]]/;%\
    MMT];C*U8+_(K^@GG,JFG\\.+[\K1G72B?FDJT&ZS2]$X-<R [R+";Q%>;]YM%
    MQSNF9)1XBV'SXEZZO1T]B+;E/N[M=;%6)^'9V?N%J>-\=28 4=X]42T&="VY@
    MQD]Q9ZU)G:.]N=803M7)B^<_=%^</OONIY/C;N>Q%TE8ST. MA.,/JD#RZ?1*
    M[H'#[WW<"+P^A\_['=N*F<I1Z2'\%J%KL%/4G5V=CW ;.3PE[4!U**HEP L5
    M#\%,,[Z%&^AJ!U_B^6IOJCEV9$J#A7RL+;S\9O3*MV)GCDZ .FC4ZG,W>1#_2
    M8>N!P;7:KYN:')CLI^K?M:&B%V8)'A!I?TI%LF+Y6KZ?3*/ G!J*TDH_5<C&9
    MGLJ=KOE*>J*1.YG\]R=V9319#$_E$MA\+9Q%/Z*/U$+061_ 1"P2S>)8NSSZI
    M&L2^.)V;[/EJGAB81(\6GU3-=--:LRN]S# TR_<//K$K(V9?F1N#V Q1=%5]
    M;&Z0?7-5A]W.@]#Q[6-P,TSSY4\0%.>$NBTI__6[#U: (#JG04@,5U/?T#%?
    MS\=K,A3A8_4\KORF>D[/5:^YLV.QSZ\WX$WG1GDSXA3D.+3 9-F#'[M-G/ST_
    M_O:[%_OYG"$2K !?B+^"XG)"O;S7I\GZ-]'R(O+_B#J/CMY<?"-:?;Y]\<'
    MWWQ=2>QD^@X/YU =!RF7%Y/-%.<C(0U\.(-[AF#+=>>8,4M'TV$DU](C$H-^
    M3:_U;-4[J/.;=U"/?C$_GSQ]<OCX:??/SO_=Y']H]=-VV%= 3.)LN9QH X7I$
    MCBDJ?K,H[7'<J#R<NUCG3CD*=>T.22M=SG- \^D.X([_O\R,X/9'</\?Y?_C
    M:FTM_F=<O>7__S_R_X:=DFO@+R<9SL0 &Y'$F>E\>]R[:R\X_R#?O\[V_\-S
    M_9N9_H#G#V(!"2KYB SP 62T)@QLQ$K>$.0?'CNMFF+4S'\[.^YHT8!/\8X$
    ME#$,OK!BLW%1Y!.I*"\$'3_YL?/XN-=YT3\54-,,1NRP<M $@;5N$'CR!/6#
    M<2]N_U;P_]+LU^O1'T( /A+_N5E+JFOQG^NW^M\OB/_MXNO)<O]=>C$WN,"2
    M@\79[*UH?Q#^2 PF!(E*; XBTK6@T<5NB>$_.M/19?8V>K%G9-#SB9%ZHH<I
    MDI;7?S*5[4VSY2,I>I)ET=ER.7]P__[;MV_W+N>3O6QT=?] OUU(JO0_4OBL8
    M2?#,Q>R2.J@]&P$D^LZ(,@:_IX/9U5*">81A1Z*'(WG[TV( ^,3\,%WGQ*%I<
    M"7D[2R6.2#191L-T&@TRV@Y*I&F#I'(38)!B$*DCLWHO4]? \2L)1.U.9-8HH
    MV8['IL'Y_'QB;5IFAF;,4U-Q)H5-^Z^S)4_[G;6)F2:<\:? 78N>"&-<I@J;L
    M1>OUI7+0/1,]G:U4RA;3Z/%AIR3U3G.->!L F4Y8^-CJ3 ';ZW^38E8)&/:M
    M'-',1M+&D\O%,HHK:G%C0&.".173&Q"6;+0G$5\RPU+,M%& )C7(Y64I,0#,J
    MUG+^26K#,%+WA\)L+R<7V6\(O/U1K9\D(UKY>K*P!)^4V7$ 1_Z@JSVU_ XAA
    M8&#6T;67(KR,*Z]6[H.0RQ[6DY+UI.Y9-GRSSPI[D\7PSV* S)M4%=S'8F,$X
    MLP'<G+H+&8J\H8%V)I+JQ+G)_@;.(Z[0"C04V;^I)/^^#1[ L_&5[=Z(!6L>,
    M_1BT*>=/86O6JN7&QNHWM@5#P-6FPK;&!D'\GHVM-,4@K1Y EG0(C?4J#!]+<
    MPSH9.-.8+/3>@$:==E2;NE=-;/^$Z0LN!"E[.#)LFH4(%V] 8#;QL^MZ@'+%)
    ML?(Z./":5P\KD_U0$]L#E^H4UM&NP>."LVQ^:[&5T\/&*S9 @KG+$FBNLUO[6
    MZ3M"Q3C5''F&TVIP%-15?\/@U,+#EH.#QA6ECD:G-O]&V3L )O@@MSV*#;J=W
    M?-+]<_\GB2<(_::IS#+(\I])5Z;;?[Y.SZ\R,."(GKC_<;7 /XJ-J'QFC+-8'
    MU3U1<?MY-LS,+/H"#_ZR1 G"D P74"<_'E(^B%9ZKE\)DBO?7N+3J^AG!5"8
    MLTO2-_72JQM:B2N^QIP8)%L*L00WM@$18VLK&)N% ;-:F\-A_MMSD<-^>7IJ
    MYO5)U_S?-=-LYE=X8KL,4O@A@R.ZJ4:(PZ&99[-7_^*J_(L VR-B)?]4]9,/V
    MCM;ZO1HU,W>$@290=E,++IC@J/0!3>4+828V SI.=@;I)HC/"[_ 0 [@-Q^+
    MO3A^\;A_"J#7D[#EFQ68MZFF33G@&:2_^8#,#N933LE"N$: Y=<#>[)I@N^GO
    M!YBLP*["[1I,;BJI 3@-'RJS7+S[E^E=P*.C$=UGWT/!VGUF)K++G]]^?W*@
    M:-'6.9Q?A"^BL@[>7U\LUJ#<!P?]_<#<U?E1.%^;"Q_-]&8 87Z_^TX#\?_=9
    MKL3[GUQ<G;O AZDA =-=$0!% C(BFIF:LYEA+(I&;MNCV7(^L*'T=%$6R6!@
    M)#0CB*4B!IP9P0PR2"KTY#S*U[A2Q6)XEEUDI3T1$\S("M* @9(F*N>6X9R8K
    MQ]4PYK8,>?<1SN]D)D5FE Z/TJ6TC6T<%3$&LXT,I[*0ZQB6)K.8?")L<VY=
    MOSWN/0C60]XCMZ%V'UF%E6JXV+#"QG=/3UZPENYWG<>/^T^ ^[4LN-4S?T)C!
    M>7'8V.,?C+B'"S?>QP]DO0+NE8V_V8,94V1+6 B!L?L&KC LI2;U*YT60#P]
    MZAP__N%Y/V2C=OO0V-GX]RNE[ @^<: NFXSV WS]EI=+P)5*JV>+X9[C[_<W
    MS):3)\(I\T*&JW+#M/GKZ-S5<2L<;?+AA38KF.2&G@._A1B UY\!L XA\;$K6
    MYL!D"Z<IG!(T+:T*E_QWS L<X 4,I!X92CDZSY:1F7'N(6XAQJ1?7_7\]&P:
    M7WUU>(!0BE4'D#8AE]PX-%$V)*L[A,5^K]$$(=L=;C9(=#( US)?!]2P2( 9G
    M0+"V?W[=)$>$>S7'8(&0.0[K!K8J/"^^'BT\HW5Y7>;A3EE 9I\)F)7UDM?3V
    MJU23^RX))7LB&9Q/FLD\GDYD*?[K*IO*@<2E_#*+ U0IDXC5YA'3011+IZ@%
    MP _Y)7='\#O.$W9V\)(GA,_#6L4@9F]OS[!@.KP-!PPA!E\_78!U #CKR@2,&
    M1E._#L.2NZCB3^YWRG;U4]&<$;8^?LJQJ2,?.N>@[(JNZ!P >1+7\W!C61PCZ
    MZXS3L\(F[-YT=!-@E14\.]&5/1&$A1E?SDCW93VE*Y8F"QR 5UH^8U@MNY&"T
    M:]*4@2J/H6AS^%L:O*GX!YNU0H5?D'T_;%^;&8+!#;8C-RW 5#9.P6LVGS(/0
    M>X[AL]I=J^)C;:*C*/$YRYPK^!G+_-EC7*_GDP::6Y'?/-K UTI^XHLGG ?5*
    MR4]=RN3O@]J@!K88%;-W<USJ6;H)O>#HVF*_@)GLG[SH'#X ^/OFNW\NIVT1#
    MG8N+[L;E;HO85)WRIJM5;1!#;'T%ZYH:\')>\;B__GFG7E: F0S.$%PO?Q!DZ
    M7:>G6*HS.,D6"*._IC4@)@;[0Q7L)O645Y<&.H <1[-*DD$J< V)J2Y4W,CR
    M4V$#98VOV4XZ\UN%IL^>R[G:7(Z7L5XF1\>'WW>>.;L)OD: Q/8LH\):EY=GI
    M<G9J.E.DXF@>&'"ADZ' '%P=,O_8;2D"$=>S <Z;'FP0FE?V!+MGUE%8+-PS
    MEZ\..>T@"%H/-ER4LNHBO.&*#NBJ/F[#%AJ)[/L9L7<R5=8 F)QV:G9S<X-FL
    M%VOQ[%=.2:7:1]%+:E1D&5[932W7I$3NLI=5^Y/?8'ZR;GW "N0PL2]8NKC&#
    M,&NIU\]Q@"&,F$XDV 'N;BI+QT/FV<T3YDBR_^:K4F[_;O]N_V[_;O]N_V[_
    G;O]N_V[_;O]N_V[_;O]N_V[_;O]N_V[_;O_^J?[^'\D"*4@ 0 $

    end

  164. Real Networks should be held liable by snack · · Score: 1

    I believe that Real Networks should be held liable for this blunder. It is their fault that all of this has gone down. They were the ones who did not encrypt the decryption key (i love saying that). These crackers should not be blamed for this. Anyways, I will still buy dvd's untill i get a 5 gbps line running into my house (Then i will have streaming dvd's (like HBO)).

    Tim

  165. Re:Hi! Mr. Lawyer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The early porn sites were immediately shut down because the volume of incoming requests either knocked the server offline or the administrators blocked it because the level of traffic was interfering with their other connections. The initial jennicam, a then free, unedited camera set up in a then college student's dorm room was publicized well enough and consumed enough bandwidth to virtually knock the university off the net for several days, and the incoming connection requests slowed their connections to outside down for several days even after the administrators shut the camera down. This is far different from the routine delivery of legal threats that shuts down sites today.

  166. Hi! Mr. Lawyer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I accidentally deleted by copy of the decyption code this morning. Arse! Does anyone have a pointer as to where it's available?

    Right. This is right up there with posts requesting kiddie pr0n. Such an obvious trap is laughabel, even thought it often snares the clueless. ya want a copy? Poll the newsgroups, maybe it'll get anonymously posted. But then you're probably not interested ingetting the program, right? I gots me copy! Nyaaaaa!!!

    1. Re:Hi! Mr. Lawyer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember a day on the net when pr0n was not omnipresent but when x gif sites (as they were known then) were secrets on the net? And when one was publically exposed on USENET, it would get slammed and shut down? Well, it's thattaway with w4r3z s1t3z, mp3 sites, MAME rom sites, etc. No one wants to attract the roving lawyers scouring the net for any lusers to feed on. DeCSS has now officially entered the 'underground'. Use a search engine and keep the results to yourself.

    2. Re:Hi! Mr. Lawyer! by technos · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry to let you down, AC, but Tet is a real /. user with a history.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    3. Re:Hi! Mr. Lawyer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So?

  167. Getting it And the Current Info... by Unknwn · · Score: 5

    Well, the replies on livid-dev are just starting. As of right now, not much is known. According to Derek's most recent message, it "potentially violates the Copyright, Designs & Patents Act 1988; Sectiond 296(1) and (2)". You can keep up with the discussion if you want at http://livid.on .openprojects.net/pipermail/livid-dev/1999-Novembe r/, which is the archive for the livid-dev mailing list.

    Also, to get your own copy of the code, do the following for bash (*csh people, export your variables properly with setenv instead :)

    $ export CVSROOT=":pserver:anonymous@cvs.on.openprojects.ne t:/cvs/livid"
    $ cvs -z3 co css-auth


    --
    Jeremy Katz
    1. Re:Getting it And the Current Info... by FauxPasIII · · Score: 2

      $ export CVSROOT=":pserver:anonymous@cvs.on.openprojects.ne t:/cvs/livid"
      $ cvs login
      $ cvs -z3 co css-auth

      --
      25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
    2. Re:Getting it And the Current Info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the password for CVS login?

    3. Re:Getting it And the Current Info... by Pathwalker · · Score: 1

      What's the password for CVS login?

      leave the password blank.

    4. Re:Getting it And the Current Info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's blank, just press enter.

  168. Re:Illiterate .sigs and munged e-mails by Mattsson · · Score: 1

    Please! No one cares if he should happen to misspell a word. (Except you, apparently.)
    Understand that not every soul on this planet can write perfect English. (Including a rather large part of the population with English as their native language.)
    Also, very few people go through every word of every letter they write with a dictionary.
    I doubt that every letter you've ever written are in perfect English either.
    Information does not become less valuable because one word is misspelled.

    --
    /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
  169. Hardly an 'official' response.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    The pointer to the response it hardly official. I WOULD like to see more information regarding who is claiming trademark infringement. Sounds like a slashdot email effect should be launched. Linux needs DVD, unfortionatly, it appears that the DVD guys don't think they need Linux.. :-(

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  170. Specifics of violation? by KMSelf · · Score: 2

    From the posted items, it appears the infringement claims may be based on either copyright or patents or both, and that the jurisdiction may be European. As I'm also not a lawyer, the following information may be highly irrelevant, though I hope it's illuminating.

    First, it's not clear that there are legal grounds to pull the plug an an entire website based on alleged but not (at least publicly) specified infringemnt. If nothing else, ISPs may face significant backlash risks for violating common carrier covenants to provide equal service to all without prejudice. My reading of the US DMCA (Millenium Copyright Act) is that protection against copyright infringment on the part of customers is offered in return for a clarification of common-carrier status, and liability limitations. This is US law and doesn't apply in the UK, but a similar legal tradition exists there.

    Second, there is precedent under US law of a similar type of reverse engineering in the case of either Sega v. Accolade or Atari v. Nintendo (I don't recall which, and it may have been another, but these are the two major cases in the area, and the subject was gaming). The basic premise was that the defendant's hardware require both reverse engineering of software to allow cartridges to run on it, and a literal copying of some small portion (14 bytes?) of code was required by the security or authentication mechanism of the console, including, IIRC, an encoded trademark. These were held to have functional, not expressive, attributes, and the defendents won in both cases.

    I suspect a bit of bluster here, and while I wouldn't run for shelter in the information I've provided, I might look to it for some ideas for defense.

    --

    What part of "gestalt" don't you understand?

  171. Question about liability by Hrunting · · Score: 2

    Saw the mention about them going after Slashdot and I immediately thought, "For what reason?" but then I thought, "Hey, let's give them a reason!" We all know that Rob doesn't censor Slashdot, hopefully removing him from liability. What if someone, say an Anonymous Coward (or in this case, Hero) were to post the source code for the entire project to Slashdot? Would Rob be liable?

    If it worked, you'd have a great source that potentially couldn't be attacked anymore than an anonymous post to a newsgroup.

    1. Re:Question about liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quick, someone log out, divvy up the source code and post it little-bit by little bit on /.!

      What's the max per post again?

    2. Re:Question about liability by mochaone · · Score: 1

      Well, Rob does support the moderation system. Is that a form on content censorship?

      --
      Hates people who have stupid little sigs
    3. Re:Question about liability by technos · · Score: 2

      This is probably not a good idea, if only on the grounds it will probably be moderated to Hell and will clutter the crap out of the discussion. Do you have any idea how large it actually is? Imagine twenty MAX_LEN messages.

      Besides, there are probably copies on thousands of user PC's. There is no real danger of it being lost.

      Also; do anyone of us really have the moral right to legally endanger (potentially, OC)./ or its creators? No!

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    4. Re:Question about liability by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Well, Rob does support the moderation system. Is that a form on content censorship?

      Of course not. Moderation is just the aggregate result of individual reviews.
      /.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    5. Re:Question about liability by Glytch · · Score: 1

      >Well, Rob does support the moderation system. Is
      >that a form on content censorship?

      Not really, since there's no difficulty in seeing all the posts if you want to. It's all based on what the user wants to see at that point in time. Besides, doesn't "censorship" (in the strictest definition of the word) connotate government action? I think that's the way it goes, but I'm not sure.

    6. Re:Question about liability by mochaone · · Score: 1

      Besides, doesn't "censorship" (in the strictest definition of the word)connotate government action?

      I'm not sure, but isn't Yahoo facing some issues about moderating the contents of its discussion boards (or whatever they call them)? I understand that they were removing posts that they demmed not to be factual. They have always claimed that they could not be liable for the content of the postings because they did not censor them. Now that they have acknowledged censoring, they have potentially opened up a hornet's nest for themselves.

      True, Rob and Gang do allow you to see all the posts, but I think a lot of people have their threshhold set to 1, so in effect censorship is taking place.

      I'm personally not a fan of the moderation system so I wouldn't mind it if Rob got scared and ditched it anyway. Rob, are you listening?

      --
      Hates people who have stupid little sigs
    7. Re:Question about liability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't clutter stuff up if posted uuencoded like this:

      Main Post
      All the replies to this post are sections of the source code. Enjoy...

      - (#1/20) Part One...
      - (#2/20) Part Two...

      But, it probably would endager slashdot so don't do it.

  172. But it isn't Copyrighted or Patented by Teancum · · Score: 1

    One of the problems with DVD-Video in general is that it hasn't been patented. If it were, the spec would be in the public domain and all of this discussion would be pointless except for trying to decide just how much of a royalty each of the original developer of DVD would be getting when for-profit copies of open source DVD software was sold.

    If you look at the DVD Fourm's licensing non-disclosure agreement you will find that it is quite restrictive. Mainly this is because DVD hasn't been patented, but instead they are persuing a course of protected under trade secret laws. If you spill the beans then your will be roasted alive.

    The Linux DVD folks are trying to get a DVD-Video player working, and right now the knowlede is being spread by osmosis or some other very painfully slow process. About half of the group has signed the DVD Forum's agreement, and the other half are busy trying to hack at DVD trying to understand how it works. The folks who know DVD are saying "yeah, you are close" or "the specs for that part of DVD are actually ISO 13818-3" or something like that to give them a hand.

    Eventually all of the information regarding DVD-Video will be made, one way or another, public knowledge. Unfortunately there won't be an open source DVD player until this happens.

  173. Help? by mackga · · Score: 1

    Maybe this would be a good project for the new Red Hat Center for Open Source to take under its wing? I mean, if this guy needs financial help, and possibly sound legal help to fend off the industry, perhaps RHAT could get some good pr.

    --

    "shop smart:shop s-mart" ash

  174. A GOOD IDEA by munson · · Score: 1

    i recomend distributing the source files to bbs's as well. this is now an internet world and they would overlook bbs's today.

  175. It is located in... by antdude · · Score: 1

    Schaumburg, Illinois. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  176. Slashdot Defense Fund by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a great idea to me. I'd definately give a few dollars away to defend people against big business.

    Well, there's my vote.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  177. Re:hmpf. by xFryGuy27 · · Score: 1

    I'm not a lawyer, but why not sue the ISP for shutting down your site? If i owned a business and someone claimed i was in copyright violation, that's between the company and me. I'm sure the ISP could be sued for loss of business or something.

  178. Self-Fulfilling prophecy? by Masker · · Score: 1

    One thing that I don't understand about this and the MP3 controversy is the approach of attacking members of a large community that is cohesive. Attacking a Linux developer is just not a good idea, since it will alienate that company or industry from a large segment of the user-base that is interested in the product. I generally buy albums that I have heard music from. Since commercial radio sucks hard, I generally don't get exposed to much music any more, but I like it when friends can send me an MP3 to listen to. If I like a couple of songs, I'll go out and buy the album. However, if the industry pisses me off by trying to prevent that from happening (which will ultimately fail unless some form of hardware encryption is necessary to play the music, in which case, it's not going to be very popular anyways since the additional cost is simply passed directly to the consumer), I won't buy it; I'd rather just ask that friend to rip the whole album for me, or let me rip it.

    The movie/music industry may lose some money from illegal distribution of media, but that's not new to DVD or MP3 copying. How many bootleg albums and videos are sold throughout the world?

    --

    ---------The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

  179. I'm not sure I understand by evilpenguin · · Score: 5

    I'm not sure I understand why they (the entertainment industry) has their shorts all in a bundle over this. Surely they new that at least some people would be knock off DVDs via a redigitalization of the analog signal? Sure, it isn't as high quality and the seconday channels are lost, but aren't they already subject to piracy galore with VCRs? And yet they make money hand over fist on VCR rentals and sales. I am fully capable of copying videos at home, and yet most of my videotapes are purchased, pre-recorded videos.

    Frankly, I think piracy should be regarded as competition. If you lower your price enough, people are simply not that tempted to pirate. I think most people would buy rather than pirate depending on price.

    In shrink wrap software (which I hardly ever have to buy anymore, thank you FSF and Linus et.al.!), I would buy just about any title at $20 or less. I'll even go up to about $60 for something like Quicken (where's the Linux version, Intuit? -- BTW, I've sent them letters swearing that I'll not upgrade again until they make Linux version. What could any future version do that my current one can't?)

    In movies, at an average price of $20, I seem to be content enough to buy them.

    I can't help but be outraged, however, at the fact that DVDs, which cost them FAR less to make than videocassettes, are consistently more expensive! I have stuck with VCRs for now because of that (well, and because I expect HDTV to be the "must" for upgrade to DVD -- why get a DVD and feed it to my 24-inch academy ratio 3-inch mono speaker TV?).

    I guess I'm saying it should be a linear programming problem to compute the price at which they get the most money rating rate of sale against rate of piracy. I don't care how much technology they throw at it. If it can be viewed, it can be copied somehow, even if it's sampling the voltages at the CRT! Give it up. Keep it open and make it cheap. People will pay then.

    1. Re:I'm not sure I understand by evilpenguin · · Score: 1

      If you new what I new. Knew, dammit! K!

      Sorry. I just hate it when my fingers make me look like a moron. I prefer to do it with the message content! :-)

    2. Re:I'm not sure I understand by Score+Whore · · Score: 1
      The fact that they did not release a linux version to begin with was foolish.


      You do realize that the DeCSS code was originally written for Windows, right? It's not really a linux thing. Linux just found incorporated the functionality into the livid project.
    3. Re:I'm not sure I understand by sirket · · Score: 2

      Exactly. If the entertainment industry stopped wasting a bazillion dollars on creating poor copy protection the cost for DVD's would not be so high and there would not be a problem.

      The fact that they did not release a linux version to begin with was foolish. This, coupled with the fact that there is no recordable DVD format capable of recording a full movie means that the industry should not worry. If they are really worried they should simply not make home DVD players capable of reading large recordable DVD's when they come out. This wont stop large scale professional pirates or computer users however nothing will stop the large scale guys and computer users aren't a _huge_ segment of the market.

      In the end the entertainment industry should just stop being such a pain. The grateful dead allowed fans to make copies of performances and then give those away and it did not stop the dead from becoming one of the wealthiest bands in history.



      -sirket

    4. Re:I'm not sure I understand by Elias+Ross · · Score: 2

      It's economics, where you sell things at the price people want to buy them at. DVD owners are willing to pay more, therefore DVD makers make more money.

      VHS copies are pretty terrible second or third generation.

      I do think that prices suck ass. In places like Japan, CD's are priced so high people rent them.

  180. UPDATE by nwetters · · Score: 1
  181. Freedom of speech, buddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone sells this DVD car.
    And there is really no other alternative quality wise to this DVD car.
    The VHS car is outdated.

    Fine. I buy a DVD car.

    I take it home, and it doesn't fit in my Linux garage.

    I figure, no big deal. Lots of people have Linux garages. Someone will figure it out.
    Specifications are available for $5000, I could figure out how to use it with the Linux.
    But I only paid $20 each for my DVD cars.
    No thanks, I'll wait for someone to figure it out.
    I'll just park it outside for now.


    Hey look, someone figured it out and posted how to do it.
    Cool, Now I can use what I paid for in a reasonable manor.

    What exactly were you complaining about?

  182. Re:Illiterate .sigs and munged e-mails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU EEEDIOT! The word is "hoard", not "horde"! Try using a dictionary sometime (like Merriam-Webster's).

    You MORON! That guy at least made some effort in order to learn foreign language. You obviously didn't move your ass and tried to learn his language, which makes you look like an eeediot.

    Moron...

  183. Re:Get DVD CSS Code here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grab it quick and pass it around.

    Come on, everybody sing along!

    "3.54562x10^5 copies of cssdvd.zip on the net, 3.54562x10^5 copies of cssdvd!
    You take one down, pass it around, 3.54563x10^5 copies of cssdvd.zip on the net, 3.54563x10^5 copies...."

  184. Um, wasn't DeCSS developed and dist. from Norway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And even if it was done in the US, the prohibition against developping software to break copy protection/security DOESN'T TAKE EFFECT UNTIL NEXT YEAR! Now the DVD lawyer squad might have a case against Xing for not protecting their keys as was required by their signed NDA, but certainly have no case against the freeware authors. This is just punishment through litigation as the little guy can't even afford to "win" a lawsuit backed by Big Corporate Deep Pockets. Bottom line, the proverbial genie is out of the bottle. Thanks to the WORLD-WIDE internet, there will ALWAYS be a copy of DeCSS floating about FOR ALL ETERNITY. HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! Now if you want to develop a DVD player for Linux, build the whole thing minus the crypto, but leave the hooks in place, so if a user...um... happens to have the decrypt code, he/she can just drop it in and play DVDs. And the player authors will have done no wrong!

  185. Re:THIS IS GREAT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now you have just proven to me that you are the dumbest mother fucker on the face of this planet. The "American Way?" What way is that? It use to be to throw Africans into chains and force them to work the white mans fields. Now it's becoming to rip off the poor and tell them lies because you believe you are better than them. You are pathetic. By the way, you can't stop open-source. It's the same thing as free speach. If you don't like it don't use it. I'm not going to argue with you anymore because I don't like to argue with hard headed, ignorant people.

  186. Progress & Profits by David+Ishee · · Score: 1

    I don't agree that progress is the enemy of profits. I think it is more along the lines of the decisions people make in hopes of making profits that can impede progress in specific areas. I wouldn't say that progress and profits in a basic philisophical form oppose each other.

    As individuals we have control over what we spend our money on and therefore have power over profits. Use that power.

    --
    Your password has expired, please login to change it.
  187. Re:THIS IS GREAT NEWS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, the American Way is where everybody has a chance to advance themselves and win the American Dream. That applies to Microsoft too, they have to be given a fair chance. But Open-Source is not fair to Microsoft. But don't get me wrong, most Open-Source is just crap anyway, but some of it is good and when people can get it for free .. duh!!! They are going to use it and not pay Microsoft for Microsoft software. Is that fair?? Most of you Open-Source whiners complained about Microsoft "dumping" internet explorer and killing off Netscape. Why aren't you complaining about Open-Source dumping its open-Source software?? It's the same thing, and your hurting Microsoft, and that is wrong, wrong, WRONG. If you think you will be allowed to spit in the face of the most innovative company history has ever produced, you are wrong.

  188. Letter of protest! by jfrisby · · Score: 1

    I have posted a letter of protest at:
    http://www.mrjoy.com/protest.html

    It needs work, and I don't know where it needs to get sent, but that information *will* be added as I get it. Suggestions welcome!

    Jon Frisby, Sr. Software Engineer,
    Personal Site (MrJoy.com)

    --
    MrJoy.com -- Because coding is FUN!
  189. piracy as competition by nfgaida · · Score: 1

    the reason they will never look at piracy as competition, is the reason they try to put their competition out of business. good capitalistic system, all companies naturally try to be monopolies, so they can make the most $$$.

    --
    *elevator music plays*
  190. This is to be expected by substrate · · Score: 1

    I think everybody saw this coming, it shouldn't be a suprise at all. I'm not sure what the outcome will be. The danger is that the content scrambling system for DVD was leaked. Anything derived from that is contaminated so the efforts to rewrite it were useless. The only way to create a legal implementation of something is via either reverse engineering or cleanroom techniques (or licensing, but that was out of the question in this case). This may mean that there can never be a GPL'd DVD decoder, the onus would be on the license holder to prove that they never saw the leaked technology. This may be difficult.

    What some smart vendor should do at this point is create a Linux DVD driver, the time is probably right to make a lot of money (selling the only Linux compatible DVD solution) with a minimal effort.

  191. Re:shut down first, ask later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) How about someone compile a list of ISP's
    that shut down content then ask question later?
    We can then BOYCOT these ISP's..

    2) Boycott DVD - it's region coded, it's proprietry
    it's not required - bring back VideoCD's!
    - they play rough, we play rougher, and if
    no one buys, they ain't getting crap!

    3) Take the DVD development underground - just like how legalities forced drugs/cracks/etc underground - ie. legalities won't stop it, just make them go under tables

  192. Speak-up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remeber, It is easy to sit here and posts gripes about this sort of thing, but it is up to YOU to stand-up up and say this is WRONG. You must always stand up for our rights. WE must rise up as a whole in order to teach the courts what technology is about. WE are many, WE are a driving force. WE CAN make a difference. I don't want my children living in a world where expressing intelligence make you suspect. YOU have a responsability to the world. They say knowledge is power, but we control the power. Companies will die without us. If you work for a company that does this sort of thing you must tell them that they're wrong. Yes I know there is a risk, I know you may lose you're job, but you can always find another job.Try regaining a freedom, THATs difficult. TrouserSnake

  193. Re:What's the big deal? Piracy costs industry zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So true. So sad. Some industries are REALLY Pirhanas... The art industry (movie, music) is, I think, one of the worst

  194. Hold your horses. by Solarus7 · · Score: 1

    You all are a tad premature. All the page says at the moment is that his page has been removed because someone
    (no names mentioned) had it removed because it violated a supposed copyright.

    No mention of being sued personally. No mention of lawyers involved. (Yet).

    Lets see how this develops before we start screaming about lawyers.

    Sol

    1. Re:Hold your horses. by sethdelackner · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I don't know what the law says on ISPs shutting down sites at anonymous requests, but I think he should sue his ISP for censoring him with no legal justification and no legal right even if they had justification because as an ISP they are not liable for content posted by their subscribers; this is part of the CDA and is current law.

    2. Re:Hold your horses. by arcade · · Score: 1

      but I think he should sue his ISP for censoring him with no legal justification

      The problem with the people of US is that you want to SUE all the time. Why not just quit using that damned isp, tell people how stupid they are, and move to another ISP?

      Damn, the world would be a much better place without all those stupid "suings".


      --

      --
      "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
  195. Re:What's the big deal? Piracy costs industry zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you meant "Entertainment". Not that the "Art" community doesn't have it's problems, but it is certainly very distinct.

  196. Ah, the brain-light have struck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear DVD-Forum, Good, sue your demographic. I guess I really didn't need to drop $2K getting my home DVD ready. Spoooon!

  197. Decryption routines.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    I'm confused by something in regards to DVD decryption. How does ANY software do DVD decryption? Do they ALL need to request to have a key? How are 'new' keys added? As they are all burnt on the disk itself, it doesn;t seem like it would be 'easy' to simply add more keys to the stack. Isn;t this a long term problem, as more companies want to USE DVD?

    Are they basically locking in a limited number of companies from producing decoder boards, based on the FINITE number of keys available, even if ther already is 'space' keys for such a purpose such as future expantion?

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    1. Re:Decryption routines.. by drivers · · Score: 1

      There is some number n of encryption keys on all DVDs. (I think n=128, IIRC) Then a key is handed out one by one, to licensees, by whoever it is that owns the standard. Damn antisocial if you ask me.

      Disclaimer: Don't bother flaming me. I don't care.

    2. Re:Decryption routines.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

      So essentially, only 128 UNIQUE entities can make software or hardware decoders. That's a shame. I'm guessing it also costs a whole lotta money to actually GET one of these keys.

      Talk about stifling development. For all they know, someone out there could be able to make a player that is somehow optimized, and can decode the data on a 286, but they'll never know, becouse they don;t have the money to buy a key..

      Did Divx also have this limitation?

      --
      -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
    3. Re:Decryption routines.. by DragonHawk · · Score: 3

      As I understand it, it works like this:

      The actual multimedia (audio/video/etc) data is encrypted with a single key, unique to that title, called the "title key". You need the title key to watch the movie. Each movie gets a different title key.

      The title publisher puts many copies of the title key on the disc. Each copy is encrypted with a different manufacturer key (and not with the title key, so you don't need the title key to decrypt it).

      Each DVD player manufacturer is given one of those manufacturer keys. They then build their DVD player with the capability to decrypt their copy of the title key, allowing you to play the movie.

      The crack was assited when some company forgot to encrypt their copy of the title key -- they storied their copy of the title key in unencrypted form. This let the DeCSS people unlock a disc without knowing how CSS worked, which made the reverse engineering of CSS easier.

      Since then, the DeCSS people have cracked more then one hundred additional manufacturer keys. Apparently, the CSS manufacturer keys are very easy to break.

      It is worth pointing out that the DeCSS people would have cracked CSS eventually, even without help. The screw-up by that company just made things quicker.

      The DVD people are now suing anyone they can get in their sights in an attempt to close the barn doors after the horse has wandered off. Typical knee-jerk corporate reaction.

      That is my understanding of all this. I could be wrong.

      --

      dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
      I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    4. Re:Decryption routines.. by Darth+Yoshi · · Score: 1

      > So essentially, only 128 UNIQUE entities can make software or hardware decoders.

      IIRC there are 400 unique keys. Aside from that, you're correct.

      > I'm guessing it also costs a whole lotta money to actually GET one of these keys.

      That's the idea. :-)

      > Talk about stifling development. For all they know, someone out there could be able to make a
      > player that is somehow optimized, and can decode the data on a 286, but they'll never know,
      > becouse they don;t have the money to buy a key..

      I honestly don't think they care whether they're stifling further development, they're in the business to make a profit. I think it's important to remember that making a profit is not _necessarily_ a bad thing.

      --
      // TODO: fix sig
  198. And the irony is... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3

    > Like the guys who wrote HLE, like the guys who cracked NT SP4's "security", the DeCSS guys are going to be pounded until they are forced to disappear or by some miracle are cleared.

    And the irony is, the movie industry will end up suppressing access by the honest people who would have ended up buying DVDs to play under alternative OSes. But the crooks who want to make massive bootleg issues undoubtedly already have the code, and won't have it posted on a web site where it's easily spotted and stamped on. The pirates will thrive, but sales won't be increased.

    They would have been better off not using encryption in the first place.

    --
    It's October 6th. Where's W2K? Over the horizon again, eh?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  199. Simple Solution... by Segador · · Score: 1

    Just send a letter to (-the-people-who-accused-this-guys-) saying that you are the real DVD Cracker. Put a copy of the sources on your website with your name appened in the sources as contributor and let it be downloaded.
    They could have a lot of money, but they just cannot afford 10000 trials in 50 different countries.... And they must know who's accused (accused?? is this correct?? sorry) first.
    I don't have any homepage, but i'm ready to open one for this cause.

    ==
    That's the time harvesters,that's the time to be care
    get back all this people, so ostentatious and arrogant.

    --
    ==
    That's the time harvesters,that's the time to be care
    get back all this people, so ostentatious and arrogan
  200. Good thing I got a copy while it was still there. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2
    Have fun proving the source is on my machine and suing me, DVD people. Have fun!

    It's your own damned fault. Treat customers like cattle, and they're going to respond like this. Treat us with a little respect, release some linux sources (or a binary) for a DVD player, and we'd all be much, much happier. Oh, well. Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

    - A.P.
    --


    "One World, one Web, one Program" - Microsoft promotional ad

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  201. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an idea, let's sue the people who are trying to give DVD a wider range of viewers. Bullshit

  202. To The Ramparts! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    Given that reverse-engineering for reasons of compatibility is still legal even in the U.S., I don't see that these guys have done anything wrong. And take a look around at all of the Linux DVD web sites. I'm told that multiple ones are down, mirrors removed, etc. IMO first ammendment rights are being stomped upon rather heavily this morning

    We need make our displeasure known using peaceful and legal means. I can't over-emphasize that. Beyond that we need to work out a strategy, and get the Linux businesses involved in supporting legal defense. Sit down now, think about what you can do, and do it today. Tell reporters. Call your congressman. Picket a video store if you can't think of anything else!

    Thanks

    Bruce

  203. That's a UK law by Booker · · Score: 2

    I'm pretty sure that's a UK law (I don't know where Derek is located) so if you're searching for more information, check the .uk sites first.

    :)

  204. They may have a case ... sorta by |DaBuzz| · · Score: 2

    Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, programmer, or even a smart guy.

    Now, it's my understanding that to read DVD's, you must utilize their encryption/decryption key system. Now, not knowing which system they use ... I have to imagine it's not a free standard. Most likely, the DVD Forum (previously the DVD consortium) has a patent or copyright on the way that DVD's utilize this system.

    It could be that the only way a Linux DVD player could exist would be to write code that works with this patented system. You can either license it, or steal it. This may lead the Forum to believe that there is only one way to write code to work with their system, so it MUST be a copyright violation.

    God forbid another programmer can do the same thing you paid millions for without using your code. *shrug*

    Anyway, I'm sure they have enough to completely ruin the lives of anyone that doesn't follow their rules or license their technology.

    I've been a long time DVD supporter and my continued support will be directly effected by how the DVD Forum handles this situation.

    1. Re:They may have a case ... sorta by David+A.+Madore · · Score: 1

      If it had been a patent, distributing the decryption software might have been illegal (provided you assume that patents on these sort of things are legally valid, which is uncertain in the States and certainly false in many countries, such as France). But it is not a patent issue, because they wanted to keep the details secret, and you can't file a patent unless you give the details (in theory, at least).

      The copyright hypothesis doesn't hold much water, either: you can copyright a literary work, or a program, but not a standard, nor an algorithm, nor a technique.

      The DVD Forum tried to keep the encryption secret. They failed. Too bad for them. Now let's enjoy the fruit of their failure.

  205. A lot of issues - reverse engineering and so on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    I've read many comments on the subject and I thought it would be worthwhile to send my .02 about all of it. I think that it's a critical moment for open source to stablish itself as a valid, legal alternative to the commercial industry. The same thing has happened before - cassete tape, CD recorders, MP3 - but the industry was not so aware to the power of the Internet. And there are also other issues being played here.

    The first one is about the legality of reverse engineering. I was surprised to not seeing any comment about it in /. Lets not be mistaken, this is completely different of getting reference code (such as in the MP3 case). In some countries reverse engineering is explicitly prohibited. Many manufacturers put clauses of usage in their licenses stating that the owner of the device is not allowed to reverse engineer it. I dont know the situation in Sweden, or any specific country for that matter.

    There is one thing that is not as discussed as it should, and is the legal defense funds for the OSS developers. Legal advice can be quite expensive. I remember all the fuss over MIDI sequencers months ago. Their work is legal - everyone is entitled to write their own interpretation of someone else's music - but it takes a lot of lawyers to prove it. The industry has enough money to pay the best lawyers, and they to their job very well. Its very easy to take out a web page - just a call from the lawyer frightens the ISP. OSS advocates should take steps to have the same weapons on their side.

    Also I read about someone else complaining that the protection was very weak, and it was easy to break. Fine - if your front door is unlocked it does not make legal to steal your home. This is not a legal defense. However, what could we do to stop it? Maybe the OSS community can come up with a strong mechanism to replace the current one. I'm sure it can be done. There is no point in keeping the algorithm secret - it can be always reverse engineered. The design of a really strong protection mechanism could be done by an OSS team, and it could be offered to the standards body. It could be the best 'proof of goodwill'.

    This leads us to another point - the reason to do it. It's a tool to watch DVD movies in a Linux box, or it's a tool to generate copies of DVDs? The Internet community (and some /. readers) must bear in mind that this protection is fundamental for the entertainment industry. We would have no Star Wars Trilogy without it :-) As someone else said, in this case it's better to have protected content than to have NO content.

    There is also a lot of smaller issues that aren't clear at all. Patents, rights of distribution, and so on. All of this must be cleared. It will be much better for the Internet community to solve this in the legal arena, so we can keep doing what we do best.

    1. Re:A lot of issues - reverse engineering and so on by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5
      I don't think we should assume that copy-protection is critical for anyone's sales. CDs have existed up until now without it, a copy-protection system was recently added to CDs, but I don't see that the industry was hurt during 20 years of its absence. Software copy-protection met with incredibly strong customer rejection.

      The record and video industry has been crying about this for years, but I think it's still a red-herring. Their real purpose is to make it difficult for you to be in the business unless you go through one of the established studios. They don't want artists to be able to do their own distribution, electronicaly, and keep all of the profits.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    2. Re:A lot of issues - reverse engineering and so on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a copy protection scheme, and built into the hardware, in a lot of CD-ROM drives.

      I mean the ones that won't extract CDDA because the manufacturers didn't provide for that in the drive's firmware.

      Drives of that sort, for instance, won't let me play CD audio out into my USB interface speakers, because the Windows 98 driver for my speakers has to be able to "rip" the CDDA and re-render it to my USB port.

      I have a number of older CD-ROM drives that won't rip CDDA. Most of the newer ones seem to be capable of it. Does anybody know if there was a legal precedent set that freed drive manufacturers to be more brave and include CDDA decoding in their firmware?

      Needless to say, there isn't any legal prohibition any more. My USB Speakers are Microsoft branded, and the drivers are Microsoft branded. So Microsoft produces a commercial product that rips CDDA.

    3. Re:A lot of issues - reverse engineering and so on by Johnny+O · · Score: 1

      This is why I still cherish both my standard and special edition Star Wars LaserDisc box sets! They look sooo good. But it is so hard to cram that 12" platter in my cdrom drive!! :-(

      Now that the ATI All-In-Blunder cards work in Linux, I bought an extra LD/DVD player to hook up to it and enjoy the movies that I can't get on DVD yet.

      I just wish I didn't have to hunt & peck for the programs, and then have to configure and compile! When will we get direct support from vendors!!! I don't use WinDOS anymore but to play some games! I want Linux support so I can get rid of my Wintendo once and for all!!!

  206. when is something secure by hany · · Score: 1
    Make it public.. let people try to crack it. If it stands the test of time... THEN it's secure, and not before then.

    sorry but i have to say that even after such public test, thing can't be considered secure. it can be considered just "not hacked yet".
    it's almost same like proving application is without error - we can't do that so we run test and then we say "we did not found bug for now".

    remember article about MS Windows 2000 security test site? remember "our" arguments against MS claiming "nobody cracked our box so w2k are secure"?

    however i agree that allowing public to review the product is the best thing author/creator can do to test correctness/validity/robustness/whatever of the thing (of course after proper desing and review by himself :).

    --
    hany
  207. Once Again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a perfect example of the linux community demanding everything to be free, and when something is stolen/reverse engineered they cry foul. This guy had a great idea to develop a freeware player/decoder but he did it the wrong way. Play by the rules or burn. Better luck next time...

  208. Re:GOOD! by MikeFM · · Score: 1

    Nice flamebait. :) I hope you're not serious. Nobody who can count past five actually thinks algorithms should be okay to patent. As long as they didn't release the source code to anybody elses software then of course it's okay to write their own and release it to anybody they want. Just because you can't do something, doesn't mean other people shouldn't. Subversive kids.. :)

    --
    At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  209. CVS: Get it while it's hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ~/css$ CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.on.openprojects.net :/cvs/livid cvs login
    (Logging in to anonymous@cvs.on.openprojects.net)
    CVS password:
    ~/css$ CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.on.openprojects.net :/cvs/livid cvs -z3 co -r Ver-0_9 css-auth
    cvs server: Updating css-auth
    U css-auth/COPYING
    U css-auth/Makefile
    U css-auth/README
    U css-auth/css-auth.c
    U css-auth/css-auth.h
    U css-auth/css-cat.c
    U css-auth/css-descramble.c
    U css-auth/css-descramble.h
    U css-auth/dvdinfo.c
    U css-auth/reset.c
    U css-auth/tstdvd.c

  210. leaky leaky by Nickbot · · Score: 1

    Any Legal Eagles out there have any idea if legal actions have in the past been able to get pee out of a swimming pool?


    --
    Praise the Force Field! Praise the Laser Project! Slackware Loon #19830573
    1. Re:leaky leaky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Going swimming, I take it?

      Be careful not to drink the water.

  211. hmpf. by vertigo · · Score: 2

    I don't like the fact that ISP's are so trigger-happy at shutting a site down at the command of the first person that sends a threatening mail, be it on behalf of a company or not, without checking if the alleged accusations are true. When they are in doubt, they just shut a site down.

    Why do i find this irritating? It removes the possibility for the site-owner to say: "okay, you think i'm violating the law? sue me."

    The way ISP's behave now bully's will always achieve their goal because the people who are willing to stand up for their rights are taken away the opportunity to do so. Even if the content of a certain site was violating a law, the offended party should take it up with the owner of the site, and not the ISP who is merely responsable for the network connection.

  212. Only one thing to do... by Millennium · · Score: 3

    Actually, two I suppose.

    1) Everyone, get a copy of the source. If you can legally serve it up (meaning no patent issues on the encryption) do it. Basically, spread the information so far and wide that it's useless to go after anyone, because it would take more money than even the entertainment inductry has.

    2) Figure out how to start a good legal defense fund. DVD on Linux would be a Good Thing.

    This said, I do have a few issues with the people who cracked the decryption. Making it possible to save the unencrypted movie on a hard disk was unnecessary and uncalled for. It's possible to rite a player without that capability, and that's what they should have done, at least at first. Were they trying to get into trouble by writing that capability into their software right off the bat?
    And yes, I know it's Open-Source, so someone else could easily have written software to copy the DVD movie. But the people who cracked the decryption shouldn't have been the ones to do that, if only as a gesture of goodwill towards the industry. The capability would always be there for someone who wants to do it, and the original hackers come out of it looking at least tolerable to the indistry.

    Both sides are in the wrong this time, albeit in different ways. But I'm sticking by the hackers, who are wrong only by virtue of a rather shortsighted design mistake, rather than the industry which, which is wrong due to undue technophobia, a healthy dose of greed, and the inability to see that copying DVD's to another DVD is pointless since a single DVD-RAM disk costs more than most DVD movies. It's cheaper just to buy it legitimately, so piracy is pretty much pointless.

    Except, I suppose, for potentially wrecking the idiotic "tiered-release" schedule the entertainment industry uses. But that's no big loss.

    1. Re:Only one thing to do... by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, making a copy onto a hard disk, while necessary for copyright infringment,is not in itself copyright infringement.

      Copyright allows for certain kinds of "fair use" copies to be made. These includes some copies made for personal use which have no monetary impact on the copyright holder, or short excerpts for use in criticism.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  213. Re: 24-inch academy ratio ? by unitron · · Score: 1
    4:3 aspect ratio perhaps?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  214. I may be wrong by um...+Lucas · · Score: 3

    But i don't remember how Linux is getting dragged into this argument. I don't recall hearing the the hackers were breaking the DVD's codes simply to be able to watch DVD's in Linux. They were doing it in order to show the futility of DVD's copy-protection scheme.

    All of you that are dragging Linux into this are really doing something bad for Linux. You need to be careful, lest if become regarded as the "renegade" OS... "Linux users don't respect intellectual property, look what they did to DVD." I'm not saying that, but it could be said in a boardroom somewhere.

    I really don't think that the movie industry singled out Linux when thinking of copy-protection schemes... They were just more concerned with Windows users, because, face it, that's where the primary market is. Most industry publications have Linux relegated to the server closet, and just recently has it's head started to pop out. It would have happened had more and more people started using Linux on the client side.

    But that's a separate argument. The fact remains (in me view) that Linux was not involved, it was simply people demonstrating that after all their hard work, the copyprotection scheme used by the movie people was flawed.

  215. Re:GOOD! by spinkham · · Score: 1

    I believe in the US, at least till next year, they have every right to publish it...
    AS far as we know, this protection mechanism is neither patented, nor legaly protected in any other way. Reverse engineering for interoperability is quite legal, as the SAMBA team has shown us.

    --
    Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
  216. CNN article. by afniv · · Score: 1

    Well, actually IDG.

    The article just mentions that a hacker group released software that would decrypt almost and DVD disk. At least it also mentioned Linux.

    Of course, there is a strong quote from Sony that they support "content protection". Like they would ever want to allow copies of there movie/music.

    ~afniv
    "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"

    --
    ~afniv
    "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"
    Richard von Weizs
  217. Re:blank password fails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm - it worked for me earlier today with a blank password...

  218. CNN article. by afniv · · Score: 0

    Well, actually IDG.

    The article just mentions that a hacker group released software that would decrypt almost any DVD disk. At least it also mentioned Linux.

    Of course, there is a strong quote from Sony that they support "content protection". Like they would ever want to allow copies of there movie/music.

    ~afniv
    "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"

    --
    ~afniv
    "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"
    Richard von Weizs
  219. We need collective memory by Kaa · · Score: 4

    We need make our displeasure known using peaceful and legal means

    To make our displeasure known is not enough. We need to know and remember who did what. We need, basically, a database that knows that on such-and-such date such-and-such firm threatened/sued/shut down a programmer/group/site because of this-and-that. In this way people in position to pressure the offending organization will know if it needs pressuring (and, for example, has a history of hostility towards, say, MP3s).

    Of course, there will have to be a significant threshold to cross before some action gets into such database. We don't want script kiddie complaints that their ISP shut them off for trying random 'spoits to end up in there.

    And yes, I understand that it is likely to end up being known as "The Slashdot Black List".

    Kaa

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  220. Re:GOOD! by Kaa · · Score: 1

    GOOD! DVD was a closed, proprietary encryption method. Nobody has any right to publish it.

    Lessee... Maybe it was copyrighted? No, likely not, there is "fair use" doctrine, and all that. Maybe it was patented? No, because that would mean it was already published. So it must have been a trade secret, and that basically means that the company relies on its own security to keep it secret. Coca-Cola's recipe is neither copyrighted, nor patented. If you found it out (without breaking any laws) and published it on the Web, there is not much that Coca-Cola can do.

    In any case, as far as I understand, this has nothing to do with the encryption method. Basically, there is a fixed list of passwords (around 400, I believe) any of which will unlock the DVD movie. All the guys did was to crack some of these passwords. And I don't think that publishing, say, some idiot's root password on the net is illegal...

    Kaa

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  221. Re:Get DVD CSS Code here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grab it here, rolled in .ZIP format for easy use.

    www.geocities/SiliconValley/Port/3 224

    Grab it quick and pass it around.

  222. Illiterate .sigs and munged e-mails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This would have gone by private e-mail. However, Kessin has decided to munge his e-mail address without an obvious de-munging step. So instead of saying it to him privately, I have to say it to the whole world:

    YOU EEEDIOT! The word is "hoard", not "horde"! Try using a dictionary sometime (like Merriam-Webster's).

    Main Entry: horde
    Pronunciation: 'hOrd, 'hord
    Function: noun
    Etymology: Middle French, G, & Polish; Middle French & German, from Polish horda, from Ukrainian dialect gorda, alteration of Ukrainian orda, from Old Russian, from Turkic orda, ordu khan's residence
    Date: 1555
    1 a : a political subdivision of central Asian nomads b : a people or tribe of nomadic life
    2 : a teeming crowd or throng : SWARM
    synonym see CROWD

    Main Entry: 2hoard
    Date: before 12th century
    transitive senses
    1 : to lay up a hoard of
    2 : to keep (as one's thoughts) to oneself
    intransitive senses : to lay up a hoard
    - hoarder noun

    So much information, so little wisdom...

  223. blank works by pohl · · Score: 1

    The connection was not being refused because of authentication, but because the server was busy. Sorry.

    --

    The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  224. Locking the door after the horse has bolted .... by taniwha · · Score: 1
    is always a bad idea .... it just makes the other users of the stable angry.

    Leaving the key under the mat is also a bad idea

    Letting amateurs implement crypto doesn't work so well either

    But the worst mistake is to alienate a whole bunch of smart people who understand locks by selling them horses but not letting them ride them

    In the future if you are basing a business on the use of large secret numbers you had better use really big ones .... and maybe not leave them around where people can find them

  225. I don't understand by nd · · Score: 1

    There's something I think I'm missing here. The DVD people are upset because now that the source is released people can copy DVD movies, correct? But, the thing I don't understand is.. why would we need to decrypt ANYTHING on a DVD disk to make a copy of it? Couldn't you just copy a "raw image" of the DVD to a blank DVD and allow the players handle the decryption? Is there a hardware layer that prevents raw reading of DVD movies or something?

    1. Re:I don't understand by Pierce · · Score: 1

      The only thing I can think of is that they get money from people that license the decryption routines.

      Wayne

  226. CSS Decryption code in .ZIP format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Get it here:

    http://www.geocities.com/SiliconVal ley/Port/3224

    Get it quick and pass it around.

  227. GOOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GOOD! DVD was a closed, proprietary encryption method. Nobody has any right to publish it. These kids are gonna get the book thrown at them. They deserve it. I wonder, however, if there's any way they'll be able to pay even a fraction of what the settlement is. I hope their pay is docked for the rest of their lives. Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. Stupid kids...

    1. Re:GOOD! by um...+Lucas · · Score: 2

      I can probably count to 999 quadrillion (I'm not sure if the next set is quintillions?, if so, i can get that far too) but I think people have a right to patent algorythms. It's intellectual property. It lets a company reap the benefits of spending all that money on R&D.

      Is the issue at hand the fact that the industry created their own 40-bit crypto algorthym and someone reverse engineered it, or is it that they're upset that someone released a program that essentially allows the duplication of their CD.

      Reverse engineering in order to create a playback mechanism in Linux is one thing, and they probably wouldn't even mind that. Piracy/copyright violations are not.

      It's THEIR movie. They own it. They paid the actors to make it. They risked millions of dollars in marketing. They deserve the rewards it brings.

      It would have cost us, the consumer, more money if they had decided to release 128 bit encrypted titles in the US and 40-bit encrypted titles to the rest of the world. That's two smaller runs rather htan one larger run. Sure you can yell about the export laws but they're a different subject.

      If you don't agree with the law, don't be and ass and break it just because you can. Write your congressman. How many outraged slashdotters do that? Or do you just preach to the quire here? I stand in favor of patents, I just think that the system needs to be revised in the computer age. Just shortening their lives would be a good thing.

  228. blank password fails by pohl · · Score: 1

    $ cvs login (Logging in to anonymous@cvs.on.openprojects.net) CVS password: cvs [login aborted]: connect to cvs.on.openprojects.net:2401 failed: Connection refused $

    --

    The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

  229. My web page by firebird · · Score: 3

    In terms of what the ISP can do with the site,
    the terms and conditions of use say that they
    are allowed to disable it if they feel like it.
    But see below.

    I've just had been supplied with information on
    the relavent bit of the Act, and it's seems to
    be about circumventing copy protection mechamisms.
    I'm supprised we have such lunacy in our Law.

    Thus that page may well fall foul of English Law.

    So don't bother the ISP, they are taking a
    reasonable course of action.

    I guess I basically need to visit a Solicitor
    on Monday.

    Derek Fawcus

  230. Re:My web page (MODERATE THIS UP!!!!!) by g.liche · · Score: 1

    Someone moderate Derek's post up a bit!

    --
    -------------------- Standard disclaimer.
  231. Legal Not an Excuse by Signal+11 · · Score: 2
    Sorry. I don't buy it. If I go out and shoot you, it may be illegal.. but you're still dead.

    Address the issue - not pass laws to try to make it disappear. I just had a lengthy discussion with somebody this afternoon about what "legal" means. Legal doesn't mean anything. You need to address the issue - ie: why did I kill you? instead of passing a law saying it's wrong. The latter will not stop me. Education will. Which one is the cheap solution, and which one is the best solution? I'll let you be the judge

    Besides... the movie industry knew how important it was to make this format secure, and they blew it. If I entrusted billions of dollars into something on the premise that somebody wouldn't do it because it's illegal... that ought to be a shooting offense.



    --
  232. 'My' arguement by Nate+Fox · · Score: 1
    So I bought my DVD of The Matrix. say I wanted to watch it on my DVD-ROM, but didnt want to pay for the software player or any hardware decoder. So I wrote my own utility to read the data (read: movie) on MY DVD. Scouring the fine print on the cover/disc of The Matrix, I find one lil blurb on the disc: "No Copying." Fine. I'll write a util that decrypts the data, and pipe it to a player (how bout an mpeg player?), thus not copying it to disk.
    I never found anywhere on the cover/DVD, nor did I ever sign anything when I bought it, that said I can only 'read' the data on this DVD with a licensed DVD player (be it hardware or software). Since its my DVD, shouldnt I be able to manipulate my software/hardware as I see fit for my own personal use? After all..I bought this copy for myself...

    In this, I dont see how 'I' broke any rules, since I own my DVD. now simply 's/I/Original Author/g' and you'll see my view on everything.

    Can someone tell me if this point of view is wrong or not?

    -----
    If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed...

  233. A vote for positive moderation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a great idea. Why do I never get moderator points when I need them?

  234. So... what IS an acceptable excuse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just had a lengthy discussion with somebody this afternoon about what "legal" means. Legal doesn't mean anything.

    I have a definition of legal: "That which has not been made illegal". As usual, the law rarely states explicitly what is "legal" to do (US Bill of Rights being a unique exception). However, books are replete with laws stating explicitly what you CANNOT do, with detailed ranges of punishments all spelled out in black and white. So I say is something is not defined to be "illegal" then it is legal. Is it Right? Is it Moral? Those are additional questions unrelated to "Is is legal?" e.g., cops here in San Dimas grabbed a guy who was videotaping pre-teen kids in their swimwear at a local water park and snapping photos of their crotch area. All this was done from outsire the park grounds with telephoto lenses. The videos and pictures were then sold. Cops found they could do nothing to him since the pictures contained no nudity and because it's not illegal to photograph people in public areas (otherwise the entire news media would be out of a job). So they had to let him go.

    The Digital Millennium Copyright Act President Clinton signed into law (which outlaws defeating region coding and macrovision among other things) in the USA doesn't take effect until next year. So it is therefore not illegal to do NOW.

  235. Why do they always take down websites. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they always take down websites in such cases, even when it is not even proven yet that it is ilegal. Sounds like execution without trial to me. When It was indeed reverse engineered in Europe they don't stand a chance, to get the programmer convicted.

  236. Section 296 clauses 1,2 of the Copyright Act 1988 by nstrug · · Score: 1

    296 Devices designed to circumvent copy-protection

    (1) This section applies where copies of a copyright work are issued to the public, by or with the licence of the copyright owner, in an electronic form which is copy-protected.

    (2) The person issuing the copies to the public has the same rights against a person who, knowing or having reason to believe that it will be used to make infringing copies-

    (a) makes, imports, sells or lets for hire, offers or exposes for sale or hire, or advertises for sale or hire, any device or means specifically designed or adapted to circumvent the form of copy-protection employed, or

    (b) publishes information intended to enable or assist persons to circumvent that form of copy-protection, as a copyright owner has in respect of an infringement of copyright.

    [(2A) Where the copies being issued to the public as mentioned in subsection (1) are copies of a computer program, subsection (2) applies as if for the words "or advertises for sale or hire" there were substituted "advertises for sale or hire or possesses in the course of a business.]

    Nick

    --
    -- "It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park" - Jim Moran
  237. Reverse engineering in Norway by Lface · · Score: 1

    Yes, this is correct, reverse engineering is allowed in Norway.

  238. Pricing Scheme not new. by kramer · · Score: 1

    It's not like this practice of pricing the new technology higher than the existing more-expensive to produce product is a new thing. Look at the difference between casettes and CD's. Which do you think takes longer and costs more to make. I'll give you a hint, it isn't the piece of tinfoil between the two pieces of plastic.

  239. More info about the paricipants please... by Malc · · Score: 1

    "Legal actions have already started to happen against the programmers who wrote the DVD-CSS decription routines. This page contains the official response by the programmer..."

    Who exactly is Derek Fawcus? How does he fit into the picture? Other stories about the cracking of the DSS talked about Norwegian programmers being responsible, but from what I've read so far on this page, Derek is in Britain (Norwegian abroad perhaps?). Why is Derek getting the heat, or is he the first of many? What can we do to help him since it appears that he has got himself in to trouble for helping us (sort of!)?

    BTW, I think that people should stop worrying about the source code not being available. It's been out there some time, and many people will already have copies ready for reposting.

  240. DVD Forum Are you listening? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There is no point to shut down the programmers site. The Linux community will start spreading the drivers across the net anyways. Watch and learn. One couldn't of stopped mp3 players, and now DVD recorders sadly. If they can't play them, hell they'll get both play and record to file if you can't provide a driver!
    A smarter strategy is to immediately provide a binary playing driver (the encryption part only being in unreadable binary) under linux with your vendors and request that the full open source be removed. Most people would follow through and would minimize the problem.
    Its stupid to think that shutting down one site will do anything. Everybody in Linux-dom is laughing at this because its provoking many people to spread the drivers... and alot of people simply do not care one way or the other being disgruntled as they are.
    I would of bought a DVD player if it had a linux driver.. am sure a lot of people would of too..
    The people who make these decisions have no idea of what will happen in the coming months with DVD from the linux community at large if they don't support Linux and keep saying.. "we are GOING TO give DVD drivers.." like a broken record.
    I predict DVD record files are going to surface and the movie industry is going to be fuming. It may not be as common as mp3 but will eventually lead to millions.. Programmers will even build recorders.. get the point?
    Why? because all that stupidity not to provide a few simple partially binary drivers to work under Linux. Linux has REALLY smart people. nothing can be encrypted. there is always a leak. Its smarter to play politics with the linux community and provide the drivers and go after the few that do it, rather than to adopt a prohibition style approach that will fail.
    So get your head out of your ass and do something intelligent to protect your investment and make some money out of by providing your OEMS more customers.
    --A linux observer.

  241. moviebone has a good take on this whole thing by DragonHawk · · Score: 2

    moviebone has a good take on this whole thing. Read the article here:

    http://www.moviebone.com/arti cles/1999/11/crypto.html

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  242. Nope, if anything this is self-censorship. by YuppieScum · · Score: 1

    I can choose to only see those articles that other readers moderated to my threshold (and by doing so demonstrate my trust in their opinions), or I can choose to see everything.

    Laziness on the part of the reader doesn't constitute censorship by /.

    I can choose not to read even-numbered pages in my newspaper, but that doesn't mean it's being censored by the sub-ed who lays out the articles.

    --
    This sig left unintentionally blank.