Slashdot Mirror


Windows 2000 to be banned in Germany?

tjansen writes "The German Site Heise reports in this article that Windows 2000 may be banned in Germany. The reason is the included deframentation software Diskeeper that is written by the Scientology-owned company Executive Software. Many state agencies and companies have policies that they are not allowed to use services from a company that is related to Scientology. " A good number of you will probably need to use The Babelfish.Update: 12/03 11:28 by H :Check out the English translation.

355 comments

  1. Seriously by penguinboy · · Score: 1

    Not that I love Windows 2000, but this sounds kind of silly.

    1. Re:Seriously by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1

      I noticed your User Info is an earthlink URL.

      Not many people know this, but
      Earthlink is owned by Scientology.

      I guess Germans aren't supposed to use
      Earthlink (or their acquired mindspring)
      either...

      If you hate Scientology as much as I do,
      you should switch providers and vote with
      your wallet.

      --
      -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
    2. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eartlink is owned by sprint, which is/soon will be owned by MCI Worldcom, I believe

    3. Re:Seriously by MikeBabcock · · Score: 3
      Have you ever actually read something about Scientology? They are quite serious -- (the Scientologists are very strong minded and those opposed to them are equally so).

      See some of these links to understand some of the views ...

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    4. Re:Seriously by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      What the fsck are you talking about? Earthlink is a subsidiary of Sprint, a publicly traded company owned by thousands of people.

      hmmm....If you own 1 share of Sprint and a scientologist owns another share, does that mean you're doing business with the Co$ since you both own shares of Sprint (or any other company for that matter)?

    5. Re:Seriously by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      "Not many people know this, but
      Earthlink is owned by Scientology."


      You are mistaking Earthlink with Mindlink. I believe Mindlink is owned by the "Church" of Scientology

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    6. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Earthlink was *started* by Sky Dayton, a hardcore, raised-in-the-church Scientologist. Earthlink was recently sold to Sprint (? I think).

      I have heard rumors that Scientology was a silent partner in starting up Earthlink. If so, they have already taken their (substantial) gains.

      I have also heard rumors that being a Scientologist is a de facto necessity to advance to upper management. This is considerably more worrying. If true, it means that Earthlink is effectively *controlled* by Scientology, even if they no longer own it. Really, it's the best of both worlds -- they have their money, and they control the company too.

    7. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earthlink was bought out by Sprint and now goes by Earthlink/Sprint. So unless you are saying the CoS owns Sprint(in which case they are practically unavoidable) Earthlink should be relatively safe.

    8. Re:Seriously by Buaku · · Score: 1
      Scientology is basically considered a criminal organization in Europe, along with new-Nazis and other dangerous cults.

      The scientology cult has earned itself a VERY bad name in certain circles. They didn't get laws like this passed against them for nothing. They worked at it.

    9. Re:Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By no means am I a CoS fan. Though could you explain how the German goverment chooses who gets on their list and who doesn? Is their a trial, or is purly at the whim of someone hidden a way in some Amt (office) somewhere?

  2. Freaky Ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh. First, it was their ads in PC Week that made ridiculous claims about disk optimization.

    Beware, though. Anyone who speaks out against this company faces a legal beating from the church we all know and love (to bash.) :)

  3. The More the Merrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is totally awesome...if China is leaning toward open source, and Germany away from Winblowz (tm). If more countries start doing this, the folks in Redmont will be out of business (or so one may hope).
    Then everyone would use Linux. Surely, world peace, elimination of all deseases, hunger, poverty, etc., and an unprecedented leap in science cannot be far behind! :-)

    1. Re:The More the Merrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't mind if Microsoft died a slow and painful death. Of course I'd still be using my Mac, not Linux.

    2. Re:The More the Merrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M$ has never been real big outside North America anyway, largely because of their record on security and the ITAR. (Why would a foreigner buy buggy encryption the NSA can probably decipher faster than he can?) Seems to me the Amiga's been a strong competitor in Germany all along.

    3. Re:The More the Merrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've never been real big outside North America, yes the most valuable company in the world that does the majority of its business outside the US 'has never been real big outside North America'. Pinhead. Microintellect. Raisin.

  4. POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the post number: 7

    It may be different, but when I was posting this, that is how I saw it.

    I FUCK NATALIE PORTMAN DAILY. MULTIPLE TIMES. WE HAVE GOOD FUCKS!

    -cow

    1. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the ##*% is this guy? An M$ lover?

      Do we really need this kind of crap? This makes the usual first post dorks seem quite nice.

      If this keeps happening, something will need to change!

    2. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by Wastl · · Score: 1

      What about a mechanism to allow only a limited
      number of Anonymous posts from a certain IP Address within a Topic? (Similar to the Poll system) Only registered users may post as they wish.

      Sebastian

    3. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by Wastl · · Score: 0

      You simply seem to have too much time. Go doing something useful.

      Sebastian

    4. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

      You have convinced me that you must be a Scientoligist trying to completely disrupt any discussion here.

      You have also convinced me that Scientologists and M$ actually deserve each other.

      --

      Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    5. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      standard disruptive tendancies of scientologists... why don't you go a f*** L. Ron Hubbard instead and leave /. alone. oh, that's right. you can't. LRH f***ed you over good and proper already...

    6. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ, dude!

      What's wrong with you? Natalie Portman's hot!

    7. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An MS lover? His language and behavior is far more in line with a typical Linux poster. Check out any Linux advocacy, or even better and NT advocacy, news group and you'll read many posts like this from Linux supporters.

    8. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shit!

      He must be gay.

      -cow

    9. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cow, shut up already...

      -dog

  5. Good old Bablefish by kmcardle · · Score: 4

    The connection between the Psycho company and the software giant is sparkling wine assigning of the large churches a thorn in the eye.

    Ah. Good. Things are much clearer now.

    Redmond will quickly work around this one by removing the offending program. Good thing the guys didn't write IE 4.0. The Germans never would have gotten win98. :)

    --

    --
    then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel is just a freight train coming your way
    1. Re:Good old Bablefish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the word "Sekt" in German most often means "Sparkling wine", but in this case it is more correctly translated into "Sect". Quite a difference...

    2. Re:Good old Bablefish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

      Ah, actually, the translation isn't all that bad. The original German used the word `Sektenbeauftragten'. `Sekt', as you may or may not know, is a sparkling white wine. But `Sekte' is used for sect. And a `Sektenbeauftragter' is a person assigned with studying sects, not an assignment of sparkling white wine... ;)

    3. Re:Good old Bablefish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there's a difference between the words "Sekt" and "Sekte(n)". They aren't even homonyms, so Babelfish should come up with the correct translation without having access to the context. Goes to show that the Fish is just plain broken.

    4. Re:Good old Bablefish by quasimoto · · Score: 1

      Good but you have to admit sometimes there is a little lost in translating. I had a "humor break" when an AEG engineer (no names) would check my 'by the dictionary' translations of his program comments. Some where quite funny. We both had a good laugh. -d

    5. Re:Good old Bablefish by kalandra · · Score: 3

      Actually if you read the German version of the article. At the bottom it clearly states to go here for an english version. Which doesn't contain the white wine BS.

      Which just happens to be at http://www.heise.de/ct/english/99/25/news1/
      for those who care.

  6. I just can't see this happening by Dacta · · Score: 2

    If this really is an issue, then the diskeeper softwear would be fairly easy to remove (if it's not, maybe there should be an Anti-Trust suit about that one!)

    I've used their product on NT4, and I believe that it is almost identical to the one on 2000. It's just a single program, people - it's pretty easy to remove it and make it a free download from the US MS site.

    1. Re:I just can't see this happening by lonely · · Score: 1

      Hmmm I have just had the Diskeeper BootDefrag tool lock up my NT Workstation for 31 hours. This on a 3.1gig partition!

      Maybe I would prefere it they didn't ship this tool with Window 2000, I don't think my manager will appeaciate me loosing 2 more days!

    2. Re:I just can't see this happening by Bud · · Score: 1
      If this really is an issue, then the diskeeper softwear would be fairly easy to remove (if it's not, maybe there should be an Anti-Trust suit about that one!)

      I've used their product on NT4, and I believe that it is almost identical to the one on 2000. It's just a single program, people - it's pretty easy to remove it and make it a free download from the US MS site.

      Is it legal to bundle a "free" download with a monopolised product? I mean, if the Germans are obliged by law not to use DiskKeeper, but have to buy the monopolised product anyway to remain compatible with the rest of the world, do they still have to pay the license fee for DiskKeeper?

      --Bud

  7. In a way, this isn't surprising by jd · · Score: 5
    If Germany makes a law, or passes a ruling, it does at least stick to it, through thick or thin. We've seen that with Compuserve, and other interesting episodes.

    This -could- be interesting, though, as Microsoft is likely to drop support for ALL other versions of Windows, in order to force people to upgrade.

    If Windows 2000 is banned, even if only in Government departments, that will essentially force the de-Microsofting of the German Government. And that could spell some interesting times for *BSD and Linux vendors.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:In a way, this isn't surprising by mcc · · Score: 1

      um. More likely, MS will simply not include the offending program in the German-language version of the W2K bug. That won't be the least bit difficult for them, i'm sure..

    2. Re:In a way, this isn't surprising by Chalst · · Score: 1

      Read the article. It doesn't say that Win2k might be banned in
      Germany, it just says that it might be the case that some state
      governments will not use it.

    3. Re:In a way, this isn't surprising by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 1

      Just a quick note: The verdict against the Compuserve manager was struck down after a double appeal (both prosecution and defense argued for the case to be dismissed) about two weeks ago.

      --

      Stephan

  8. the Psycho company. by Dast · · Score: 1

    "The connection between the Psycho company and the software giant is sparkling wine assigning of the large churches a thorn in the eye."

    Gotta love that translation. The Psycho (note the capital "P") company. :) Can you feel the hate?

    Now, I'm don't love the church of Scientology, but can someone explain this to me? And what is up with the references to "sparkling wine"?

    --

    This sig is false.

    1. Re:the Psycho company. by jaclu · · Score: 1

      Reharding sparkling wine:
      In German you use the spelling Sekt both for the Wine and for the religious sect

    2. Re:the Psycho company. by CMBurns · · Score: 2

      I think you refer to the german section

      > Die Verbindung zwischen dem Psycho-Konzern und
      > dem Softwareriesen ist Sektenbeauftragten der
      > großen Kirchen ein Dorn im Auge.

      Now the german word for "sparkling wine" is "Sekt", as opposed to german "Sekte" (note the additional "e") which means "sect".

      The mentioned "Sektenbeauftragen" are people who observe said sects. In this case, they are employees of the (catholic/protestant) church.

      So sorry, no alcohol this time. Just religion (which - as we now - is opium for the masses, not a bad deal, huh?).

      CMBurns, german by nature.

    3. Re:the Psycho company. by gotan · · Score: 3

      This is because Scientology is perceived in Germany neither as a church, nor as a sect, but as an organisation threatening the democratic system in germany. They are observed
      by the german "Verfassungsschutz" and aswered this with a public relations campaign, even drawing parallels to the persecution of Jews in the Third Reich.

      --
      "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  9. To summarise... by Rob+the+Roadie · · Score: 2

    W2K may be banned in Germany because a portion of the operating system (sic) was produced by a company owned/partly owned by the Scientologists?

    Thats one in the eye for M$ but I can never see this standing up!

    1. Re:To summarise... by pod · · Score: 1

      The germans have some pretty strict rules against infiltration of their government. Which is exactly what scientology is accused of (and found guilty and banned from germany).

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    2. Re:To summarise... by greenrd · · Score: 1
      That's correct. It's substantiated as well. If you don't believe him/her, read the original article, or even better, this, from the Bavarian government no less:

      http://www.innenministerium.bayern.de/english/scie ntology/

  10. Clue vacuum by Moonwick · · Score: 2

    Take a moment from your drop-of-a-hat Microsoft hatred to actually read the article. The issue at hand is that the Scientology 'church' operates a suspected intelligence organization (WISE) that the German government does not want to risk contaminationg German affairs. It's not about Microsoft hatred. It's about paranoia.

    --
    Only on slashdot can a posting be rated "Score -1, Insightful".
  11. They are serious... by zorgon · · Score: 5

    I'm not too sure about that article (Babelfish implied that the spokesman was the Catholic church's official in charge of sparkling wine, which I think would be a pretty cool job actually, Dominus vobiscum), but the German federal government is really serious about Scientology. If I'm not mistaken the legal sanctions being imposed against Scientology are pretty much the same as those being used to suppress Nazism... it would not surprise me if the German government goes toe-to-toe with Microsoft over this one if it proves correct.
    --

    --

    I am quite civilized, and I should be brought a beer immediately. -- Bruce Sterling

    1. Re:They are serious... by achim · · Score: 2

      First of all the term "Sekte" (religious splinetr group) has as much to do with the term "Sekt" (sparkling wine) as with "Insekt" (insect)...

      More important is the fact that this warning was issued by the catholic church and not by state officials. They tend to exaggerate a little when it comes to CoS. I'm not a fan of CoS, but the big churches in germany tend to be quite hypocritical of "their competitors".

      Though we have laws that fight antidemocratic groups by cutting on their rights, this is always done cautiously and the dangers that come from the goup have to be quite clear. Based on that I would not expect real consequences on the findings here. The danger of CoS infiltrating the world by means of a disk defragmentization program seem a little too far fetched.

      If MS wasn't concerned, nobody had cared at all.

    2. Re:They are serious... by Balazs · · Score: 3

      I'm not mistaken the legal sanctions being imposed against Scientology are pretty much the same as those being used to suppress Nazism


      Finally, a CORRECT usage of a Nazi reference.

      In German-speaking countries, there is legislation against some kinds of groups that are aimed at undermining the democratic system.

      Scientology belongs into this category, as do extreme right and extreme left groups. The only difference is Scientology's ability to buy ads in US newspapers signed by Hollywood "stars" to lie about "a new Holocaust" in Germany.

      --
      Computers. You can't live with them, you can't live without them.
    3. Re:They are serious... by swb · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, once the German Supreme Court has ruled that the Scientology folks are a threat to democracy, that pretty much leaves it up to the constitutional police to enforce their rulings. The constitutional police have nearly unlimited powers to enforce the court's rulings, since they only report to the court.

    4. Re:They are serious... by Jor · · Score: 1

      The danger of CoS infiltrating the world by means of a disk defragmentization program seem a little too far fetched.

      Hmm, just think of all those temporary files from your favorite home-banking software or crypto-suite, that get deleted from harddisk once the application is closed. The data however will remain until physically overwritten by some other program or until a disk-defragmentation program defragments your disk.

      Now, since i cannot look into the Source Code of any Windows2000 component, i am unable to dismiss scenarios where this software deliberatly searches for confidential information and transmits them to a scientology server next time you go online. (Hint: OpenSource cannot get into this situation...)

      Compared to the Scientology Organisation, Microsoft is a free, liberal, open-minded philanthropistic bunch of very nice free, liberal, open-minded persons.

      Note: this only applies in direct comparison to the Scientology Organisation.


      --
      --
      Jor
    5. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      The constitutional police have nearly unlimited powers to enforce the court's rulings, since they only report to the court.

      Nop.

      • There is no such think as a constitutional police in Germany.
      • There is no special political police in Germany.
      • There is the Bundesamt fuer Verfassungsschutz in Germany
      • German's Laender have similar organisations
      • The Verfassungsschutz is part of a democratic system to protect the democratic system itself.
      • The Verfassungsschutz is an pure intelligence organisation, mostly in the business of observing suspicious organisations.
      • Most information is collected from open sources (no, not code :-), like news papers, and publications.
      • The Verfassungsschutz has no police rights, can't arrest people, can't search homes, can't confiscate belongings
      • The Verfassungsschutz mainly reports to the federal and Laender governments
      • The Verfassungschutz cooperates with regular police, corts, prosecutors in case crimes have been found
      • The Verfassungsschutz is controlled by the minister of interior, the parliament, and the privacy protection responsibles. Unlimited power? What were you smoking?
      • It is subject to court orders if misbehaviour has been found.
      • It publishes its main findings in a yearly report (so that observed organisations know they are observed :-))

      Wherever you got your "information" from, please consider to drop that source. Maybe a visit to the library would be in order, too? And stop watching these old war movies is maybe also a good idea.

    6. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
      The danger of CoS infiltrating the world by means of a disk defragmentization program seem a little too far fetched.

      Actually not. I cannot think of any user program that could access as much information as the disk defragmentization program. In fact, I never thought about this, but the disk defragmenter is the best place to put a trojan (system crashes or is abrutly powered down - and voila - you can modify W2000 kernel, any driver code, any registry entry, any directory access, any executable, any file on the system).

    7. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The 1997 report of the Verfassungsschutz is also published in English: http://www.bmi.bund.de/publikationen/vsb1997/engli sch/index.html

      Translation of the 1998 report might come soon.

      Makes it even simpler for CoS to read about how they are monitored. So much for the unlimited power of the ``constitutional police'' (Boy, the US school system must be really broken, still using your gov's propaganda material from WWII?)

    8. Re:They are serious... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Moderate this guy up!

    9. Re:They are serious... by billybob+jr · · Score: 1

      Police being kept in check by the courts? sounds like the United States.

    10. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get real. A trojan can be in any app on any (yes, even Linux) operating system. It's hardly likely to be in Windows2000, do you really think that Microsoft would risk that kind of liability for the CoS? Why don't you try spreading your FUD somewhere else? Oh, I guess /. is the perfect place for anti MS FUD so carry on.

    11. Re:They are serious... by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

      It is ironic that a government which bans ideas such as Nazism, or Scientology etc. would do so under the guise of "Protecting the country from totalitarianism." They are only becoming what they are trying to prevent. (IE National Socialism prevented free thought, modern day Germany prevents free thought)

      I have read of similar things about France (regarding Scientology).

      Unfortunately the United States (I believe) is heading in that direction too (under the guise of "protecting the people from 'hate'"). It will not be too long

    12. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Get real. A trojan can be in any app on any (yes, even Linux) operating system.

      That's true. But by definition a disk defragmenter can (must) access any single file on the filesystem, and the applications are not to be running (so it can change anything silently). If your chess programs tries to open /etc/lilo.conf and then makes a read+write of your /vmlinuz, you can strace it and catch it. And you are not expected to run it as root anyway. But if it is a defragmenter program, then it is expected to run with full privileges for read/write on the entire disk, and if it changes the content of some random file, you'll have a hard time catching it.

      t's hardly likely to be in Windows2000, do you really think that Microsoft would risk that kind of liability for the CoS?

      I don't know. It was just pointed that the "defragmenter" is the best place to put a trojan that could run for years unnoticed, not that this is actually likely to happen.

      Why don't you try spreading your FUD somewhere else?

      The problem is not about Microsoft. It is about Microsoft using a product that will have free access to maybe 5% of the entire content of all the hard drives of the planet , a product coming from a company related to the CoS which is known for 1) targeting at making the most money possible ("More money, more money, more money"), 2) suing and harassing anyone who dares to say anything against them, 3) infiltrating any organization 4) have so ridiculous "belief/ves", that most of its dirigeants must be dishonnest (see http://www.xenu.net/).

      Yes it can happen with Linux, FreeBSD, ... but then you'll have the source code, so the trojan could be found, if you want to check for one.

    13. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking of Nazies, Poul Nyrup Rasmussen(Danish PM) Just said on National Tv that he have found out that his dad was a member of the Danish Nazi Party during ww2! if nothing else, you have to be sligtly impressed that he have the guts to tell it!

    14. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      scientology is not free thoought. One of the first things you do when you join the cult is submit to hypnosis. They f*ck with you mind, badly.

    15. Re:They are serious... by gatekeeper-eu · · Score: 1

      Some correction is needed here. The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (as in BfV)has 'Officials' (as in Beampte) not Police (as in Polizi). Their power is not as you describe. Any powers they have are precisely described in the Federal Constitution and Law (die Paragraphen) and in enforcing rulings of the Constitutional Court, they are as in most other western and AngloSaxon countries, 'servants of the court'. In this case only the power of the court as defined in the constitution.

    16. Re:They are serious... by gatekeeper-eu · · Score: 1

      Your typing was quicker than mine! see below. signed: Freundlicher Inzel Affe. (Private Euro Joke)

    17. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly enough..

      Europe in general just doesn't get the idea behind freedom of speech -- Noan Chompsky could tell you about that, any one remeber his paper on Freedom of Speech during the '70 that caused the French
      to go ape shit?

      Freedom of speech is a US thing, you
      don't find stuff like that in Europe. Oh sure you could write some article about how the Chancler is
      a jerk, heh.. Though he'd just sue you then and you'd have to prove it in a cort of law (gotcha!). Though in all fairness, during Carnaval (Faschings),
      you're technically allowed to say what ever you like -- for one day. Intresstingly enough, during the Nazi erra, Carnaval was also bann.

      The Germans at least seem to think that "Kontrole" is they way to do everything. One can just hope that the yonger generation there figures it out.

    18. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humm.. And Jorg Haider isn't a threat?

    19. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only half right.

      The German government is not trying to prevent free thought. Far from it. They are not banning Scientology. What they are banning is the Church of Scientology. That's the organization, not the practice or the belief system. The German government doesn't ban the Freezone or any other so-called 'squirrel' groups (think of them as the protestants of Scientology) that practice Scientology beliefs but don't obey the orders of the Church itself.

      The Church of Scientology would have you believe that, by banning it, Germany is banning all of Scientology. It also claims that the Church of Scientology speaks for and represents all Scientologists worldwide. That's a little like the pope claiming he represents all Christians in the world (well, maybe he does claim that, but at least he doesn't have people killed who disagree). The German ban on the Church of Scientology is the same as if Germany banned any dealings with members of the Council of Cardinals. The Vatican might moan and complain, but Germans would still be allowed to practice Catholicism.

    20. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get me wrong, but since the fourties we are a bit cautious in Europe about organizations that attack human rights, the democratic system or the right not only of free speech but of free thinking. Scientology does that. The German constitution doesn't allow ppl. to do that. So why should the German government use software of doubtful origin to handle important data? Let them chose not to do so. Isn't that part of free markets: the right to chose?

    21. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >(Boy, the US school system must be really >broken, still using your gov's propaganda >material from WWII?)

      It's got nothing to do with our school system-- the way that modern Germans organize their government is simply too insignificant for our school system to concern itself with.

      Germany doesn't matter.

    22. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a good bout of crack you're smoking there?

      i'm an american and i think you're a complete fool if you think that ANY other country is insignificant.

      any of us has the power to economically destroy all the others...

    23. Re:They are serious... by gatekeeper-eu · · Score: 1

      The (modern) German constitution and legal system is based on the AngloSaxon model. If you still have not got the point - your (the US) system is also based on the AngloSaxon model - you are saying you don't know about your own constitution or its origins? That to be brutally frank does not supprise me.

    24. Re:They are serious... by zorgon · · Score: 2
      First of all the term "Sekte" (religious splinetr group) has as much to do with the term "Sekt" (sparkling wine) as with "Insekt" (insect)...

      DoH, of course! I'd forgotten about Sekt. Left my Langenscheidt somewhere else... Okay, I want the job of being in charge of "Sekt." Not the other one. Thanks... z
      --

      --

      I am quite civilized, and I should be brought a beer immediately. -- Bruce Sterling

  12. It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by Philipp · · Score: 3

    The article quotes an official of the Catholic church, not a representative of the government. The word "Bann" in the headline has to be seen in this context: its a condemnation of the church. So to take this quote and speak of Windows 2000 going to be banned in Germany is quite a leap. So, don't believe everything Babelfish tells you and calm down, folks.

    --

    things. take. time.

    1. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by jw3 · · Score: 4
      You are wrong: they also quote an official from the Innenministerium, the ministry for internal affairs, section devoted to Scientology. And the "bann" in this context meanst that it would not be used by public offices - and this does not have to do anything with the church.

      Regards,

      January

      P.S. No, I'm not using babelfish. I just speak German and live in Germany.

    2. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by EricWright · · Score: 1

      Since you actually speak German, would you mind posting a "real" translation, and not some crazy crap that babelfish spits out? I'm sure a lot of us would appreciate it. Thanks.

      Eric

    3. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is not true. I have once dealed with a big german bank (I am German, too), and before I was allowed to do anything, I had to sign a paper that I am not affiliated to Scientology.

    4. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by Philipp · · Score: 1

      The quote of the lady from the Hamburg office is not in relation to Windows 2000. And come on, let's get real: You don't seriously believe that anyone in the goverment would stop Microsoft from shipping Windows 2000 to Germany, are you?

      --

      things. take. time.

    5. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by jw3 · · Score: 1
      The quote of the lady from the Hamburg office is not in relation to Windows 2000.

      It is in relation to Executive software.

      You don't seriously believe that anyone in the goverment would stop Microsoft from shipping Windows 2000 to Germany, are you?

      No, although the Germans keep amazing me. But it gives them a bad breath. And for us - a brand new little name to call the Windows users: "booooo, ya scientologists!".

      Regards,

      January

    6. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by jw3 · · Score: 1
      The quote of the lady from the Hamburg office is not in relation to Windows 2000.

      It is in relation to Executive software.

      You don't seriously believe that anyone in the goverment would stop Microsoft from shipping Windows 2000 to Germany, are you?

      No, although the Germans keep amazing me. But it gives Microsoft a bad breath. And for us - a brand new little name to call the Windows users: "booooo, ya scientologists!".

      Regards,

      January

  13. MS will support NT & 98 for four years by Dacta · · Score: 3
    after they stop shipping. It is in their standard support agreement.

    Why does it always have to be me defending MS from all the FUD on /.

    I don't like MS, and it kills my Karma. :-(

    Oh well.. if someone said something wrong about Linux, I'd do the same thing.

    1. Re:MS will support NT & 98 for four years by mistered · · Score: 2

      It depends on what you mean by support, though. Of course if you call Microsoft "support" and are willing to pay $195 (here in ca) per incident, they'll "support" you.

      Don't try to tell me that they'll "support" 98 and NT by releasing all of their applications for the next four years in 98/NT versions as well.

      --
      Enjoy your job, make lots of money, work within the law. Choose any two.
    2. Re:MS will support NT & 98 for four years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four years? Is that it? I have an old IBM typewriter that is older then Sputnik. They still provided spare parts last time I cared to check. Now that's support-)

  14. WTO will jump on them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    I suspect the WTO could make a case for this being back-door protectionism, especially given that Germany has a large native OS distributor. I'm not sure who I find more scary, the WTO or the Co$.

    Of course, I'm sure there are some Linux contributors who are scientologists, but I guess the regulation concerns companies.

    BTW, what does Win2000 need a defragmentor for? I thought disk fragmentation was cracked long before journalling and b-trees hit the agenda.

    1. Re:WTO will jump on them... by nine9 · · Score: 1
      I'm definitely more afraid of the Church of Scientology... (see my Website

      ) nine9

    2. Re:WTO will jump on them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I suspect the WTO could make a case for this being back-door protectionism, especially given that Germany has a large native OS distributor.

      I suspect it is not necessary the case. For instance some drugs are legal in France (alcohol), and others are not (marijuana). But the WTO won't do anything, will it ?

    3. Re:WTO will jump on them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I suspect the WTO could make a case for this being back-door protectionism...

      "Back-door Protectionism?" I think I saw that movie... wow, that WTO sure is kinky!

    4. Re:WTO will jump on them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Co$ won against the IRS.

      THE IRS!!!

      Co$ is scary.

      (Posting anon-like because they is SCARY)

  15. Law by dnnrly · · Score: 1

    Doesn't German law try to actively prevent 'cults' from spreading. I have a feeling that this is a side effect of thier anti nazism laws.

  16. I laughed. I cried. by EricWright · · Score: 1
    Oh, that was extremely funny. But, don't we typically use the Psycho company and "the software giant" interchangably?

    Another of my favorites is...Harald bear, catholic representative for sparkling wines and world looking questions. I'm glad someone represents these noteworthy causes! You think Mr. Bear can give us some good tips on champagne futures? I missed out on the RH IPO!

    Eric

  17. Re:FIRST POST by albalbo · · Score: 1

    You know, with the Universe and karma and all being how it is, you're in for one hell of an eternity ;))

    Alex.

    --
    "Elmo knows where you live!" - The Simpsons
  18. Re:THIS IS A NOTIFICATION. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this somehow related to the anti-WTO protests?

  19. Not Germany is banning!!! It's the Catholic churc! by Mika+Uka · · Score: 2

    Your answers seem to imply that Windows 2000 will probably banned by Germany. But that is not the case, it's just a report of a German computer magazine (Heise) that the Catholic church is about to ban Windows 2000 for that.

    Actually I personally ban Windows at all - from my personal computers. Although I still have to use that OS at work. But that's another story ;-)

    Bright Blessings
    Mika

  20. too good to be true? by cabalamat · · Score: 1

    Sounds too good to be true. Unfortunately.

    OTOH, Germany is funding open source software (GPG).

    1. Re:too good to be true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until they find out that some scientologist has contributed to the Linux kernel, then it will be banned as well.

  21. What's totally awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Banning the purchase of a product based on the religion of the author? Sounds like the Germans are still up to their old tricks from the 30s, when Jews were the pariahs.

    Some people always got to have a demon.

    1. Re:What's totally awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientology isn't a religion, it's a cult, pure and simple. If you're willing to see the light, see here: http://www.xenu.net/

    2. Re:What's totally awesome? by jilles · · Score: 2

      Scientology practices extortion and other bad things. The german government is very right in staying clear of anything this organization is involved with.

      Actually I think the idea of MS teaming up with a scientology owned company is pretty ironic. Believe me MS' fud practices are amateurism compared to what scientology is capable of.

      Some might claim that prohibiting an organization like scientology goes against free speech but does free speech include extortion practices?

      --

      Jilles
    3. Re:What's totally awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its more than that, this is banning a product because of one small utility that comes with it. It's like banning Fords because the CoS made the airbags.

    4. Re:What's totally awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, if the CoS is still getting the money and the airbags are reinstalled by the car after your restarting your car like Windows does.

    5. Re:What's totally awesome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you use your internet connection for?..... It seems that you dont know anything about them... Research, research, research first....... Click here to see the light...

  22. Re:FIRST POST by Mike+Monett · · Score: 1

    Agree. I understand the desire to maintain freedom of speech and avoid the appearance of censorship, but this crap is getting out of hand. It is wasting everyone's time and making ./ look foolish.

    Why not specify "Fair Use" conditions that automatically assign a special category to "first post" and the use of profanity. And enforce it.

    If anyone want to read this junk, they can change their filter limits. The rest of us shouldn't have to put up with it.

  23. Re:Enough!!! by Fruan · · Score: 0
    Hmm. I agree.

    Also, has anyone else wondered what Ms. Portman's reaction to that... that... drivel would be? *I* find it... disturbing, at best.

    --
    Shawn Poulsen (Fruan)

    "On Slashdot, many obvious things are insightful." - Annonymous Coward, 2000/7/9

  24. Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 4

    The Co$ has a history of attempting to disrupt online discussions about them, if they are likely to be critical of the "Church". The Usenet newsgroup alt.religion.scientology is legendary for this.

    So I wonder if this loon with the "Natalie Portman" posts has been hatted to disrupt Slashdot?

    1. Re:Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by EricWright · · Score: 1
      No, probably just some pimply faced teenaged, high school dropout with nothing better to do, and pissed off that Segfault doesn't put up with this sort of crap anymore.

      Eric

    2. Re:Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your ISP? Please tell.

    3. Re:Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft!

      -cow

    4. Re:Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by HR · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking, it's not futile to have assholes and their material removed from a forum, and, with any luck, from their ISPs.

      The worst offenders are always a small minority of users. Vandals are usually punk kids with a difficult home life or psychologically aberrant adults, neither of which exist in large enough quantities to matter. If you can keep shutting them down from their ISPs, only the truly obsessed wackos will continue to find new ISPs to abuse. The more noise you can get from these freaks, the easier it is to get a lock on the individual doing it. Then targets of abuse have more options to pursue.

    5. Re:Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • You have to stop the core, which would be me.
      see, he tells us exactly what action should be taken. all we have to do is track this idiot down and kill him. if someone else does the tracking, i'll do the killing, k?
    6. Re:Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so ignorant. You can't lock all immature / stupid people away. Deal with the problem. Set your threshold to 1, do whatever you want, but don't blame people who have a hard lot and a not so l33t life.

      > Vandals are usually punk kids with a difficult home life

      No, Vandals are a great punk band. You know, the punk kids like them.

    7. Re:Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm.. go get a life, you little prick. Please. For your own sake.

    8. Re:Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a lonely person. I'm sure theres someone out there that will make you happy. Don't give up so easily -- she is out there. Don't ever give up on your dreams or on your happiness. You seem like an intelligent person, don't do this to yourself. Don't give up -- ever -- you will find her!

  25. Entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ok, I have my popcorn ready.

    How long will it take that we hear the usuall Nazi, free speach, first amendment, US rulez, my country is better than yours type of flames by people who for sure haven't read the article?

    Ahh, this will be an entertaining slashdot "discussion". Not that it will have contents, but maybe the editors will sooner or later learn to check their news headlines and clipings a little bit better before posting?

    What happend to the old journalistic rule: Check, check, and re-check?

    1. Re:Entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Already happened: #59,

      Wana share some popcorn?

    2. Re:Entertainment by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? Article #59 reads nothing of the sort, and is a perfectly legitimate statement (save the remark specifying the Germans).
      The fact is that the United States doesn't "rule," and is just as fascist in certain areas.

      The United States is better with regard to freedom of speech, and has not yet made illegal Nazism, Scientology, and other "questionable" beliefs.

  26. Major idiot by LinuxGeek · · Score: 0

    Actually, I think Miss Portman has much better taste and style than to be seen with a person of your obviously expensive psychiatric problems.

    If you are a big supporter of Scientology and want to disrupt any competent discussion about this article, then you have a good start towards that goal. But I don't see anyone applauding your methods and I doubt that any serious Scientologists would appreciate your methods.

    Have a good day and may God bless you.

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Major idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple bunch of cocksuckers and motherfuckers...
      Click here to know more about this suckazz

  27. Re:Enough!!! by segmond · · Score: 1

    No more Anonymous cowards will not fix this, this guy could be doing this via an automated script, he can easily register an account with any free website, then with his script continue the stupid act. The best thing is simply to trace him and have him spanked, tho he might enjoy that.

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
  28. No... by Megaweapon · · Score: 3

    The whole Natalie Portman thing got moved to Slashdot because Segfault.org stopped allowing people to post messages. I was a frequent Segfault reader, and Natalie Portman was a very common topic over there. The Natalie Portman/Statue/Mae Ling whatever/etc... people just moved over here to Slashdot.

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
  29. Good new GPLtrans by Krollekop · · Score: 3


    Maybe it's time to advertise the use of the GPLtrans engine instead of Babelfish ...

    Unfortunately, their German translation unit is under maintainance for a few days. Too many words [...] and MySQL isn't responding
    correctly
    , the web site says.

    I for one hope that GPLtrans will be mentioned next time a non-English article is referenced on Slashdot.

    Kk.

    1. Re:Good new GPLtrans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPLtrans has German translations disabled...

  30. Remember. by Dark+Fire · · Score: 0

    Whoever is posting those F*** Natalie Portman messages and the like obviously is not capable of intelligent conversation. Whatever their reason for posting on Slashdot, they are certainly not doing a very good job of making their point. Are they (a) Microsoft Zealot (b) Scientologist (c) Person w/ too much free time (d) Orange (e) One of those lint sculptures of cowboy neal that has formed a rudimentary intelligence and is posting to slashdot.

    I go for (E).

    Shawn

    Hey, why not make that the next poll?

    1. Re:Remember. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you had read more of this guys posts, you would realize that he IS intelligent. He is desperate, in need of human companionship and compassion, although I'm not sure if he knows this himself. He's probably getting a kick out of you calling him stupid. Hes destroying himself... which he does not deserve. He's better than this. Instead of ignoring and putting down those who are suffering (such as this guy), we should offer them all our support. I urge this guy to rethink his life, and what hes doing. Hes better than this.

  31. Diskeeper (OT) by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    Don't use version 5... I had a similar problem.

    You know you're in trouble when they threw out the fairly useful interface in version 4 in favor of hooking into the Microsoft Management Console.
    The program also seems to run in real-mode priority regardless of what you tell it. My machine took 20 minutes to repaint the screen so I could shut the d*mn thing down.

    User Interface Hell... and it locks up your computer. I never had trouble with DK until version 5 and have just switched back to 4, no useful functionality lost either.



    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:Diskeeper (OT) by EvlG · · Score: 2

      I agree. The MMC sucks big time. It's probably one of the most disappointing things about Win2k. The old tools like WinDisk and such are now tied into that load of bloat, making the tool run slower for no good reason. And the startup time is VERY annoying as well.

      More Microsoft bloat with no useful gain.

    2. Re:Diskeeper (OT) by Wah · · Score: 1

      please, keep things in perspective..

      More Microsoft bloat with no useful gain.

      It's called "innovation" people, c'mon get with the program....

      --
      +&x
    3. Re:Diskeeper (OT) by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair to Microsoft MMC was an attempt to gather up all system management tools into one place.

      Of course, what they ended up with is a sprawling mazelike mess that is far more difficult to use than the disparate tools it replaces. I went back from IIS 4 to IIS 2 because it was took me about 20 minutes of wandering aimlessly just to configure basic ftp server functionality. And since everything is so random, you end up having to wander through aimlessly every time you use because nothing is intuitive. It's all just an endless maze of twisty little options all the same.

      I don't know what the User Interface experts have been doing for the last ten years, because in my opinion, GUI's are steadily and consistently getting worse.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  32. Hrm, an interesting alliance. by Bad+Mojo · · Score: 1

    We know Microsoft is rather un-ethical as far as companies go. And Scientology is the ultimate Evil. Is there any doubt that the two are linked? It won't suprise me to see more `alliances' in the future between these two tyrants of vile injustice.


    Bad Mojo

    --
    Bad Mojo
    "If you can't win by reason, go for volume." -- Calvin
    1. Re:Hrm, an interesting alliance. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised to find Bill Gates evolved from a clam...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Hrm, an interesting alliance. by Medieval · · Score: 0
      And Scientology is the ultimate Evil.

      No, that would be Amway. :D

    3. Re:Hrm, an interesting alliance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sounds like typical Slashdot rabidly anti-M$, paranoid speculation. Needless to say, I'm not a huge fan of Redmond, but even I can see that M$ has nothing and wants nothing to do with the Scientologists. M$ is just a bunch of egotistical software geeks that spend more time counting their money and fucking other companies over than actually working on their products. But what they want are money and fame. As much as you'd like to thing otherwise, they really could give a shit about mind control like the Scientologists do. They just want your money.

      One more thing to all you Scientologists out there, do you REALLY think it's such a good idea to run your web server on NT4? Just something we all need make a mental note of......

  33. Paranoia by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 2
    The funny thing about this is, that the german army uses Lotus Notes internally with its weak encryption routines (the NSA has part of the key).

    The Scientology issue may sound odd, but as the government has found that they have been trying to infiltrate the state agencies to gain power and thus they have been considered a risk to the country's security, the decision not to use Windows 2000 would just be a side-effect of the politics of avoiding such threats.

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  34. According to c't 25 the story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    as follows: Windows 2000 contains Diskeeper, a disk defragmenter. Diskeeper was created by Executive Software. Executive Software's CEO is Craig Jensen, a fairly high-ranking Scientologist (OT VIII and stuff). Scientology has been under investigation as being a danger to Germany under the `Verfassungsschutz'-laws. Partly due to those investigations many companies and governmental agencies in Germany are asking their members, employees and commercial partners to sign documents in which they declare not to have anything to do whatsoever with the teachings and religion of L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology. Now, Microsoft cannot truthfully sign these contracts anymore, and therefore many companies will at least think twice before doing business with Microsoft. Microsoft's official reaction is that you can simply remove the offending Diskeeper. This, however, seems to be quite somewhat easier said than done.

  35. I've upped my thresholds, so UP YOURS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah

  36. Help, we're under attack by a herd of clams! by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1
    Hey, this sure looks like an organized attack from the scientologist (a.k.a. clams).

    Years ago, they tried the same kind of shenanigans against the alt.religion.scientology board, which is a forum for scientology criticists. First they tried to shut down discussions by forge-cancelling any critical article, and when that didn't work any longer, they tried swamping the board with meaningless rubbish.

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  37. Re:Enough!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, and it probably is done by a script.

    Two remedies, the boring one is to look for the "i have post..." bit and ignore any posts,

    or the funny one (imho) is to ban any posts talking about natalie portman... ;)))

  38. Re:Enough!!! by Fruan · · Score: 0
    Although I hate to get drawn in by a troll such as yourself, I really must say that such a comment is rather weak, coming from an anonymous poster.

    Which really is the whole point. By allowing people to post anonymously, you allow people like yourself to act without fear of the consequences.

    --
    Shawn Poulsen (Fruan)

    "On Slashdot, many obvious things are insightful." - Annonymous Coward, 2000/7/9

  39. Ich bin ein Deutschlander by nhowie · · Score: 2

    Right I'm moving to Germany ;)

    Does this mean that GNU/Linux will be banned in the US of A, since Richard Stallman is obviously a communist... ;-)

    On a serious note, though, this amounts to state censorship, and should not be tolerated - I'm surprised that this doesn't contravene some EU directive. Perhaps if the defragger had some pop-up instructing the user to join the Church of Scientology, then it might be justifiable. Also, do the German government intend to ban all John Travolta (or any other star related to the Scientologist) films?

    If you want to ban W2K, I can think of far better reasons.

    1. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Babelfish translation translates "Bann" wrong. It does not mean especially in this context that the german government forbids W2K to be selled in Germany, it only means that the german catholic church or some parts of the german government will not use W2K because of this relation to something coming from scientology. In germany most officials see scientology more as criminal organization using mafia methods.

    2. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by EJB · · Score: 1

      I think the Germans consider scientology a criminal organization. I don't think banning products from criminal organizations is something people would object to.
      Wether scientology is should be labeled as a criminal organization is the whole point, but it is another discussion.

    3. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by Rick+Razzano · · Score: 1

      Germany is not the U.S.; state censorship is legal in Germany. Last time I checked, they have their own constitution.

    4. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by wossName · · Score: 2

      Well, once you are in Germany you hopefully learn to speak (or at least read) the language, since you apparently don't understand what the c't newsitem was about.
      This has nothing to do with state-censorship, because the government only forbids its own agencies to do business with Scientology-related companies, and even that only in Hamburg and Bavaria AFAIK. And it makes perfect sense, as we have seen with the latest User ID-transmitting follies of programs less relevant to system security. This defragger will probably not send your password files to the Internet, but it should at least be checked, especially when it was developed by a Scientology-controlled company and especially when you're a government agency.
      I agree with my government on few things, but on this issue I'm pleasantly surprised how well they "get it" about Scientology and the US government doesn't.

      As for John Travolta/the Cruises, I'd guess that they probably don't even know what Scientology is _really_ about. They're obviously kept around for image reasons ("Hey, they're rich and famous, so how can Scientology be a bad thing ?"), get the VIP treatment and don't have to submit to any interrogation or rundown tortures. (At least I haven't heard otherwise)
      The only reason one might consider banning their films for is bad acting, but that's just IMHO. ;)

      And to the moderators: the above post got upped ? Please, that was mostly polemic !

      --
      Someone is wrong on the Internet!
    5. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by Feral+Wylde+I · · Score: 1

      You must have used Babelfish for the title,
      it is supposed to be Ich bin ein Deutscher!
      Aber Ich bin ein Franke! Danke!

      State censorship in Germany still allows you to
      buy pornography, and legally drink at an age that
      would toss you in jail here. Prostitution is also
      legal. The EU doesnt mess with the internal
      domestic policies of their member nations.
      I was surprised when I returned to the USA that I
      had to wait till I was 18 to drink beer and how
      intrusive our religious groups are here.

    6. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all I am German myself. Maybee I missunderstand you here but it seems to me that the German states Bavaria and Hamburg have laws not to employ software that was in whole or in part created by the Church of Scientology. As there are among other things expected to pay for it (and quite a lot too) it's certainly their right to choose not use software of a more than suspicious origin. The German constitution grants the right for religious freedom, free speech etc. but it definetly stops where these right are beeing abused to violate or harm others, this is basically where the German constitution draws the line. I have never been able to make any sense how the Americans interpret freedoom. Freedom to sell guns but not, for instance smoke pot. Total freedom and if possible anarchy for business but not for people.

    7. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

      Well, it goes like this:

      American freedom is partly a farce. While on one hand our Federal Constitution allowing practically anything (it is very vague), we also have our federal government violating it whenever they wish. The United States has absolutely never allowed complete personal freedom.
      For example, we have to right to own firearms, although we can not own certain types of firearms. We can use drugs (coffee, tobacco, alcohol), but not others (pot, cocaine, LSD) (I believe it depends on who is giving the most money :))

      We still have freedom of speech (for the most part), and I can, for example, put up a Nazi website claiming that Hitler helped the German economy, and was an all around nice guy, and the Government cannot take it down (my ISP can, however).

      I am, for the most part a libertarian, and I believe in more social freedom (with regard to drugs etc).

  40. Re:Enough!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kick, Ban, Name and Shame...

  41. Operating systems... by Zerah · · Score: 1

    Hmm...
    I guess you can see this is another bad
    thing that happens when you start bundling
    too much stuff together with OS... if Microsoft
    had sticked to only making OSen and not bundling
    everything into it, they would not have run
    into all this hassle...
    Internet Explorer, Stacker, this defragging
    software... the list goes on.
    Seems like the old saying of sticking
    to your corebusiness still holds some truth....?



    1. Re:Operating systems... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... Why does the average Linux distro come on 3-6 CD's then?

  42. New "tech" banned due to Scientology? by Deosyne · · Score: 2

    Why are products by Scientologists banned by German companies? Does Scientology have ties with neo-Nazi groups or something? Babelfish rather garbled that article, so I coundn't discern the reasoning of that if it was in the article, and I can't find any info about that elsewhere. Anyone know?

    Deosyne

    1. Re:New "tech" banned due to Scientology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know that products are banned, but Co$-'infected' companies don't get public orders AFAIK.
      Scientology aims at destroying the current democratic systems, defies human rights etc., so there are serious constitutional concerns.

    2. Re:New "tech" banned due to Scientology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientology has a history of covertly infiltrating government agencies (IRS for one, I believe) to spread their crap, or to protect themselves. Its not too much of a stretch for Germany to believe that this software could have some hidden function. I personally don't believe that M$ would let that slip past; they must have code reviews for an included part of W2K. Still, it isn't all that hard to believe that it could happen, given the CoS history.

    3. Re:New "tech" banned due to Scientology? by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      Mostly because Co$ is NOT a religion. It is a conspiracy motivated ripp-off

      American Law states that just about everyone who thinks his mind is fed by a "higher force" and creates a new religion, has the right to call their delusion so; "religion"

      Well, Science Fiction writer Ballard though this would be a really cool way of accomplishing World Domination (literally) So he wrote an extra few books about "Thetans" and "OT levels" and other "secret" stuf. You gotta read some of that. It is some of ballards best work .Of course that is illegal, cuz copyrighted. Which doesn't prevent anti Co$ activists to publish it anyway of course.

      Still, cus of the silly laws, silly Americans Like Cruise and Travolta this organization is quite big, influencial and well, dangerous.
      They are known for discreibility tactics for attacking enemies, in fact some of the stuff they publish (secretely, intern) is about how to "break" enemies and perform other illegal methods.

      The german government (as a lot of others have done less publically) recognized the danger of such an organisation, who uses such brutal and illegal methods, hidden in a "religous" org., and has rightfully outlawed them.

      Greetz Richard

  43. Cults... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Good idea, although I happen to like Windows 2000. If you actually USE it it's damn good (and looks cool, esp with Transperizer...).

    This is a legacy I think from the Anti-Nazi laws everybody made Germany pass after WWII. But if it allows somebody to halt the march of such an enigmatic (and law bashing...) cult then they can't be that bad!

    While we're on, could we ban Mormon's as well?

    1. Re:Cults... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, Mormons don't exactly have a history of subverting their opposition. Remember this is a group that believes in upholding the law, even if you happen to disagree with it. Also, the main reason the germans are going after the Co$ is for certain aggressive tactics that have been used to silence or punish their detractors. Mormons may not be popular but they strictly uphold the law and don't actively oppose their detractors. It's the fact that the same can't be said of Scientology that causes nations like Germany to wary of them. Definitely a case of apples and oranges.

    2. Re:Cults... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You're asking /. readers to actually use a Microsoft product before forming an opinion on it? Not likely to happen in this lifetime.

      Hell will freeze over before a positive Microsoft or negative Linux article appears on Slashdot.

  44. CAN SOMEBODY STOP THESE MORONS? by kristallin · · Score: 1

    This is post number 643.972571563*2984

    Shut the heck up, people, and comment on what's going on, or at least post nude pics of NP here *grins*
    Seriously, if you want to babble on like that, get a life, and get a list, they're free at Onelist, you know... that way you're not getting on any /. reader's nerves with posting senseless $h*t!
    Do good for once!

    --
    you never know - reality may leave beta-test today!
    1. Re:CAN SOMEBODY STOP THESE MORONS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people pull this crap, there IP should be posted. It was this kind of junk that ruined segfault for me to the extent that I can no longer go there even now that write ins are gone. Excuse any bad grammar, I just woke up.

    2. Re:CAN SOMEBODY STOP THESE MORONS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad most users probably have dynamic IP's...

    3. Re:CAN SOMEBODY STOP THESE MORONS? by CrAlt · · Score: 1

      Ya but then you would at least know what ISP the guy was on, and maybe RobM could make a preferences option to block that ISP for you.

      --
      I have to return some videotapes...
  45. Adding to Germany's paranoia by Tradewars+Addict · · Score: 1
    What happens if members of the Scientology group have contributed to Linux, etc.?

    ??????

    I mean it could happen, couldn't it?

  46. Both Good and Bad .. by arcade · · Score: 2

    When reading this, two things occured to me.

    First, i don't like the idea of banning neither religions, free speech or programs made by people / companies that has a certain belief. I have this nagging feeling when I hear about germans banning nazism. Of course, nazism is a Bad Thing(tm), but on the other hand.. it should be *legal* to have certain kind of opinions, and it should be legal to meet other people with the same opinions.

    The same thing applies to Scientology. Its a Bad Thing(tm), but on the other hand, I think its bad banning them, and I think its absurd to ban Windows 2000 just because a tiny little program inside it, is made by a company funded by clams. (Clams, slang for "scientologists").


    But, when we think about OUR goals, that is, killing of microsoft, scientology, nazism, and so forth .. I think the germans make good use of their laws. And, I guess it really could help SuSE, if windows2000 cannot be sold in Germany. I vision the entire German population using Linux and so forth. Oh, sweet dreams. :-)


    But, on the whole, I really think it stinks that they ban win2000, just because of some clams. Even though I don't like clams.. except for dinner.. I think :-)

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    1. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by ge · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's Scientology's beliefs that got the German federal and state governements all upset, it's their actions.

    2. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Reinoud · · Score: 1

      >First, i don't like the idea of banning neither religions, free speech or programs made by people / companies that has a certain belief
      in general, you are right, but Scientology is a "relogion" that states that it's beliefs are more important than the law. For this reason, the German government has decided that it is not possible to do government work and be a member of the "church" at the same time.

      Whether Scientology is a church at all is a different discussion. Im some countries they have been declared a criminal organisation in court verdicts.

      --
      -- Nothing is as subjective as reality --
    3. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Camelot · · Score: 1

      As the Germans see it, Scientologists are criminals, not preachers. And I whole-heartedly agree with them.

    4. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Myddrin · · Score: 2

      in general, you are right, but Scientology is a "relogion" that states that it's beliefs are more important than the law.

      If you check, most religions say this in one way or another. The law is of man, the Law comes from a higher power. (Or in the case of Buddhism is just how the universe works.)

      The german gov't finds the Orginization (the earthly part of the religion) to have done some very bad, bad things. I am already a little quesy with the idea, but I would have a major problem if they where saying that the beliefs of the religion should be banned.

      As far as I know example, the german gov, doesn't have any problem with the squirels (the people who leave $cinetology, but keep practicing the "tech").

      Just my 2 cents worth....
      RobK (Buddhist)

      --
      Myddrin
    5. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The german gov't finds the Orginization (the earthly part of the religion) to have done some very bad, bad things.I am already a little quesy with the idea, but I would have a major problem if they where saying that the beliefs of the religion should be banned.

      It's their actions that wory people. Their ignorance of human rights, their clear statement to destroy every government and become the supreme rulers of the world, their infiltration and espionage activities, and the more disgusting things.

      These people don't need to be banned. Criminals belong into prisons.

    6. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by aprentic · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I always wondered why the list of crimes in the Church of Scientology included "Continued association with squirels." Do you have any idea why they picked the word "squirrls" for this?

    7. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Myddrin · · Score: 3

      I'm very fuzzy, but I seem to remember that LRH coined the phrase, referring to how cute and fuzzy squirels will steal nuts from people. Something like that. I talked to a few back when I hung out on alt.religion.scientology. They didn't seem like criminals to me, actually _most_ of them were very nice, just a little wierd. (There was one guy, Homer something that kept drawing me into flame wars.... :) )

      A bunch of them have banned together and formed a free society (the name of which I can't remember), that persues LRH's ideas w/o the oppressive leadership of the {ahem} Church. (They even liken them selves to the heretics during the Spanish Inquisition.

      I think there might be more info on xemu.net , but I can't be sure.

      RobK

      --
      Myddrin
    8. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Myddrin · · Score: 2

      It's their actions that wory people. Their ignorance of human rights, their clear statement to destroy every government and become the supreme rulers of the world, their infiltration and espionage activities, and the more disgusting things.
      These people don't need to be banned. Criminals belong into prisons.


      Agreed, Criminals belong in prison. However, I was trying to point out that most people's beef is with the orginization, and that if you meet a $cientologist they are not ness. a criminal. Nor IMNSHO should believing in $cientology ness. be a crime... that's a little 1984ish

      It goes like this in some people's minds
      Some $cinetologist are Criminals
      Tom is a $cientologist
      ___________________________
      Tom is a criminal.

      This is not true as any student of elementary logic will tell you.

      --
      Myddrin
  47. Can Slashdot stand up to the clams? by cruise · · Score: 2

    Wow, there is surley enough derogatory comments about the clams in here to send them off into a legal frenzy. Can Slashdot stand up to the Scientologist Effect? Will they remove comments once the legal eagles come swarming in? Will they withstand the personal threats to their home and family!? Will they even notice the private dick who has been watching their every move since the article was published?

    All this and more....

    1. Re:Can Slashdot stand up to the clams? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So long as nobody posts the text of any of the 'secret' documents of the 'church' of scientology, slashdot should be ok. God help it if that should happen though. The cult really has NO sense of humor about that sort of thing.

  48. Re:Seriously -- No doubt! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think this is a joke you have never had to live near these freaks. I think the German government has good cause. Frankly they'd be better off with the Nazis than the Scientologists.

    Check out this site (which they have been trying to shutdown for a long time).

    http://www.xenu.net/

    You really have got to wonder about a cult that can scare the IRS into submission.

    What a bunch of kooks!

  49. Tranlation by SL2C · · Score: 3

    Windows 2000 in danger of being banned

    A component of Windows 2000 was made by a scientology company. The defragmentation program "Diskeeper" is scheduled to be shipped in February as a standard part of the NT successor.
    It is being developed by the firm "Executive Software" of the confessing [?] scientologist Craig Jensen, as has been reported in c't issue 25/99. The connection between the psycho trust and the software giant is a thorn in the side of the large churches.

    "This will not be interesting to the Catholic Church alone, but also to the states, the Verfassungsschutz [one branch of the secret service] as well as the German industry", Harald Baer, catholic commissary for sects and wold outlook issues [Weltanschauung issues], commented to the German press agency (dpa). According to Ursula Caberta, leader of the Scientology working group of the Hamburg interior authority, Executive Software is one of the leading businesses in the Scientology organization WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises). [She says] WISE is "the decisive branch of Scientology in order to infiltrate and spy on the economy". In the states of Bavaria and Hamburg, there have been resolutions according to which authorities, in particular in the area of information technology, are not allowed to buy services from scientology businesses. (em)
    (cp/c't)

    1. Re:Tranlation by Kartoffel · · Score: 1
      I smell clams.

      Rob, Hemos, Neal: how about logging the ip's of AC posters? Just automatically encrypt em and file them away somewhere.

      I realize that abusiveness is a subjective thing. It would be cool if the /. administrators could pull up a log somewhere and see that, for example, 123.45.67.89 has posted a hundred AC comments about Natalie Portman in one discussion.

      Keep the logs secure and private, but if it looks like someone is being *seriously abusive*, you could subject that person's access rights up to moderation? Create an anonymized track record of _all_the_posts_ from the alleged abuser and allow moderators to decide if it's abusive.

      If the moderators give it a thumbs-down, ban the ip.

      Ack! end of rant. Everyone be sure to watch the Mars landing coming up in a few hours. I can't wait! ^_^

    2. Re:Tranlation by lacinyc · · Score: 1

      Nice view on Free Speech. :/

      ALL speech should be free, sadly even that of idiots.

      It's hard to stomach sometimes, but for real freedom you have to let whoever say whatever they want whenever. any limits are just that, limits.

      If you are limited you are not free.

      --

      --
      -- "My dad used to play sports with me... I don't like sports" -Tim
    3. Re:Tranlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot is a privately-owned website. Rob is free to do whatever he wants, including censoring it. Tops would be getting rid of the clams.

      www.xenu.net

    4. Re:Tranlation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rob is free to do whatever he wants, including censoring it.

      Technically, yes, but once he institutes a policy of censoring material, he'll legally be obligated to review everything for censorchip. Personally, I'd much rather have him wasting his valuable time looking for new bizarre stories so I can waste my valuable time reading them. Moderation seems to be the best alternative (and seems to be effectively frustrating the Scieno noise generators).

  50. The Church by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do believe members of the church of scientology has been part of the open coding process sorrounding Linux in particular and several of the applications it can run too. I guess german must ban every Linux distribution too then. I wander what the germans will be running on those computers. BE OS :)

    1. Re:The Church by Jjaks · · Score: 1

      You're wrong. Executive Software is part of WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises), and that bothers the Germans. As they say in the article, the Germans consider WISE an organisation committed to spying on and undermining the economy. The fact that individuals who are scientologists may have contributed to the coding of Linux, or that individuals employed by Red Hat (or others) may be scientologists wouldn't bring about the same reactions in Germany.

    2. Re:The Church by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do believe members of the church of scientology has been part of the open coding process sorrounding Linux in particular

      Total lies. Name one developer.

  51. L Ron Hubbard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Germans take the whole ani-cult thing (which many view scientology as) real seriously since WWII. They have several anti-totalitarian clauses in their constitution which is supposed to keep someone like Hitler (L. Ron Hubbard) from gaining any type of political power. Anyone affiliated with scientology will be black listed, I'm not kidding.

    1. Re:L Ron Hubbard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good!

    2. Re:L Ron Hubbard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Several anti-totalitarian clauses in their constitution which is supposed to keep someone like Hitler (L. Ron Hubbard) from gaining any type of political power.

      Of course the Austrians have the same clause in their constitution.. Didn't really do Austria much good. They just voted Jorg Haider into parlement (which gives him a seat in the EU BTW).

      Jorg Haider: put a ban (verbot), more or less, on all forigners in his state (Carintha). There is a 0 (zero) visa quota for forigners there. Cute..

  52. That explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always had the gut feeling that RedHat is evil. Thank god I didn't buy their crappy product!

  53. Re:Seriously -- No doubt! by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

    Lots of people got beef with scientology. And vice versa as well...

    Check out this link: http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/

    This page belongs to a good friend of mine, and she's been crusading against scientology for quite a while now. Not to mention that Scientology is trying to shut this down as well.

  54. I this even M$'s fault this time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is odd- Germany is going to ban Win2000 because of a underlaying application? I am very much not a M$ advocate but this does not sound fair.

    1. Re:I this even M$'s fault this time? by shitface · · Score: 0

      Who cares- no one likes M$

      --
      Real men dump cores! Read my journal, I am neat.
    2. Re:I this even M$'s fault this time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      This is odd- Germany is going to ban Win2000 because of a underlaying application? I am very much not a M$ advocate but this does not sound fair.

      Germany seems to defend itself against an intelligence organisation trying to undermine the democratic system. This intelligence organisation happens to be the one of the CoS. An organisation which hasn't precisely a track record of lawful, democratic behaviour and respecting human rights.

      It's the dammed right of the German government to decide which type of software from what organisation they want to run on government computers. It is as well the dammed right of the German church to run or not run whatever software they want on their system.

      The problem here is, that it is closed software, so there is no easy way to find out if it is harmless or not. Would it be open-source, this wouldn't be much of an issue, since then they would be able to check the code, independent of who wrote the software. They have chosen not to trust software related to the CoS - fine. Most of us have chosen not to trust software related to MS - very fine. So, if it's fair for us to bann some MS software from our computers, it's their dammed fucking right to do so on theirs.

      The remaining question is, why do we Americans react so sensitive to any news /. reports from Germany? I suggest some answeres:

      • We have gone through a sensibility training regarding Germany by our, not always neutral, media. So we are hypercritical.
      • We don't bother to check the facts. How many of us have read a trustworthy translation of the original German article before posting?
      • We don't bother to check the facts, because it's in a foreign language, and the short, rough slashdot article, with tabloid style headline is enough to fuel our prejustice.
      • Who cares about foreigeners anyhow?
      • Hate feels good. Hating Germans is accepted by our society. So it's feeling good without feeling guilty.
    3. Re:I this even M$'s fault this time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hate feels good. Hating Germans is accepted by
      > our society. So it's feeling good without
      > feeling guilty.

      I rather object to the notion that anyone who criticises and/or disagrees with the policies of German governmental/religious institutions hates the Germans. The tactic of silencing all opposition through continual repetition of such wildly exaggerated and blatantly false claims is used to great effect by those of certain political persuasions, and is very disturbing.

      These institutions may have good reasons for banning this Church of Scientology (which I, admittedly, know nothing about), but, barring comments which actually support such a claim, those who disagree with them (including CoS members) should not be accused of hating them, or those they represent.

  55. Many state agencies and companies have policies th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > WTF? I thought the Germans had learned their lesson on laws that put down particular religions.

  56. bans distro. by Phill+Hugo · · Score: 2

    Choas in the street! has BANNED distribution. Slashdot erupts with rasied voises calling for immediate revokation of the ruling and flames the entire nation.

    said "this is a direct attack on the freedom of the people to choose what they wish, we should fight this at all costs".

    When contains GNU/Linux, this would be the story. The Spokeman would no doubt be Eric, Bruce or Richard and we'd all be telling each other to hold back the mindless mail bombings to whoever's government is offending.

    But this times its Microsoft, so it doesn't matter. Good on !

    Surely there is something wrong here. Yes, I know its MS. Yes, I know its scientology but this a stupid reason to suggest not using something, let alone banning it.

    We'd not let anyone suggest not using GNU/Linux just because Linus and the TLA crew[*] converted to some minority, much less becuase line 5329 of Perl was bug fixed by a member.

    Phill

    * ESR, RMS, ETC.

    1. Re: bans distro. by ge · · Score: 1
      Oh, please. What we've got here is someone from the Catholic church in Germany making a statement. I don't think W2000 has been banned yet. Some German states have rules that don't allow the govt. to fund anything that furthers Scienotoly's cause. It's questionable whether these rules will be stretched this far.

      When a Scientologist contributes to Linux by providing GPL'ed software s/he gives up control over it. There's a difference there.

  57. About using the right means to fight wrong by Camelot · · Score: 1
    I hate doing this, but - again - I find that I have to defend Microsoft. I would like nothing better than see Microsoft locked up in chains and the key thrown away. But, it has to be for the right reasons.

    ESR has it right, even though I don't totally with him - Microsoft should be taken down by natural forces (ie. market). Let's ignore the fact (ie. MHO) that it wouldn't be possible without the intervention of the DOJ for now, since it's not really relevant.

    Windows 2000 banned in Germany ? Fine with me. Doing it because of scientology is simply clouding the issue - the only good reason to do it would be because Microsoft and its products are bad for your health. Any other reason will allow Microsoft to be victimized and gain symphaty.

    Like I said, I don't like to be on the same side with Microsoft, but for the sake of doing the right thing, I'll do it.

  58. Translation by gotan · · Score: 1

    Windows 2000 threatened to be banned

    A component of Windows 2000 comes from a scientology-company. The defragmentation program "Diskeeper" is intended to be marketed as an integral part of the NT-successor. It was developed by Executive Software, a company of the confessing Scientologist Craig Jensen. The connection from the Pseudo-company [Scientology] to Microsoft bothers representatives of the big Churches concerned with sects.

    "Apart from the catholic Church also all German states, the office responsible for defending the constitution, and the german industy, will take an interest in this." comments Harald Baer, catholic representative for sects [...]. According to Ursula Caberta, head of the "workgroup scientology" of Hamburgs interior office, Executive Software belongs to the leading businesses of the WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises) Scientology organisation: "WISE is the main branch of Scientology for undermining and spying out the economy." In the german states Bayern and Hamburg resulitions exist, saying that official authorities may not buy services from Scientology-companies, especially in the Information Technology sector.

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  59. A quick and dirty translation by Ignatius · · Score: 2

    Windows 2000 threatened by Bann

    A component of Windows 2000 comes from a Scientology company. The defragmentation software "Diskeeper" is to be shipped in February as a fixed component of the NT successor. It is developed by the company "Executive software" of the admitting Scientology member Craig Jensen, as c't reported in the issue 25/99. The connection between the psycho company and the software giant is a thorn in the eye of large church sect-observers.

    "That will not only interest the catholic church, but also all provices, the Verfassungsschutz [German equivalent to the FBI], and the German industry" comments Harald Baer, catholic official for sects and Weltanschauung-questions, to the german press agency dpa. Accoring to Ursula Caberta, head of the Scientology working-group of the Hamburg office for internal affairs, "Executive Software" is among the leading companies of the Scientology-organisation WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises).
    WISE is the "crucial lever of Scientology to infiltrate and spy the economy". The states of Bavaria and Hamburg have existing resolutions which forbid offices the aquisition of services form Scientology-companies, esp. in the field of information technology.

  60. They won't release security fixes by divec · · Score: 2

    > MS will support NT & 98 for four years
    > after they stop shipping. It is in their
    > standard support agreement.

    Well since two years ago, it has not been possible to get a copy of Win 3.1 which has had all known security holes patched, and Win 3.1 stopped shipping only two years before that. I think "not fixing root exploits" is not the same as "supporting".

    Didn't MS claim to have lost some of the Win 3.x source code last year? That was less than four years after they stopped shipping it. How they're supposed to "support" a product to which they don't even have the source code, I don't know.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

    1. Re:They won't release security fixes by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      "Root exploits"? You must be talking about NT 3.1, which stopped shipping in 1994 or so. Fixes for plain 'ol DOS/Win3.1 continued for a bit into 95-96 with networking fixes and a version of IE4.

      And yes, AFAIK "supported" at Microsoft means that if you call on the phone someone will have some idea what you are talking about. It doesn't necessary mean that there will be many or any bug fixes.

      However, I'm guessing that Windows 2000 will be a special case for MS support, because ActiveDirectory is going to scare people away from upgrading for a long time. Look at Novell -- they came out with a new version of NetWare 3 just this year for the we're-still-scared-of-NDS crowd-even-after-you've-browbeat-us-to-upgrade-for -five-years crowd.
      --

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  61. Translation of German news text by harmonica · · Score: 5

    Everything in [] are my comments to explain things. Translating this shows me how much a good translator is worth! ;-)
    --
    Windows 2000 threatened by ban

    One component of the Windows 2000 software is coming from a Scientology enterprise. The defragmentation program "Diskeeper" is going to be released in February as integral part of the
    NT successor. It was developed by Executive Software, an enterprise belonging to the confessing scientologist Craig Jensen, as C't magazine reports in issue 25/99. The connection
    between Scientology and the software giant is not liked by the Sektenbeauftragter (person responsible to review the activities of sects) of the large churches.

    "This is going to interest not only the Catholic church but also the Bundesländer (states ), the Verfassungsschutz (government institution that supervises activities that are against the German constitution) and the German industry", comments
    Harald Baer, Catholic representative for sects and philosophy of life [that's a straight translation] in response to DPA [a news agency].

    According to Ursula Caberta, who leads the study group Scientology of Hamburg's Innenbehoerde [an institution of the City of Hamburg], Executive Software belongs to the leading enterprises of the Scientology organization WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises). WISE, according to Caberta, "is the crucial arm of Scientology to infiltrate and spy on trade and industry". In Bayern and Hamburg [German states, Hamburg is a city state] there are laws that forbid public institutions, especially on the information technology sector, to buy services from Scientology enterprises.

    1. Re:Translation of German news text by harmonica · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own post, but re-reading this: Translating this shows me how much a good translator is worth! is a bit contradictory - I meant that a professional translator (which I am not) could have done a much better job... I've simply copied and explained many German words for which I didn't find a translation.

  62. CO$ Attack on /. not working by trance9 · · Score: 3

    Hah. I didn't even notice all the Natalie Portman spam because I always read with at least a minimal level of filtering based on score.

    That must drive the CO$ weenies crazy. I remember when they successfully ruined alt.religion.scientology by spamming the group with so many messages that any real discussion was lost.

    Scientology is an evil organization that is willing to go to any lengths to further its greedy interests. I'm not talking about protesting, or organizing church dinners here--death threats against "enemy" newspaper reporters, collecting damaging information about their own members for use as blackmail in the event that they testify against the cult, attempting to shut down, harass, and bankrupt critics... the list goes on.

    I don't blame the German govt. for not wanting to run any software written by Scientology. Given their thug like behavior in every other area, why would you trust their code? They probably did build some backdoors into it.

  63. [Country] bans [Vendor's] [OS] distro. by Phill+Hugo · · Score: 1

    Choas in the street! [Country] has BANNED [Vendor's] [OS] distribution. Slashdot erupts with rasied voises calling for immediate revokation of the ruling and flames the entire nation.

    [Spokesman] said "this is a direct attack on the freedom of the people to choose what they wish, we should fight this at all costs".

    When [OS] contains GNU/Linux, this would be the story. The Spokeman would no doubt be Eric, Bruce or Richard and we'd all be telling each other to hold back the mindless mail bombings to whoever's government is offending.

    But this times its Microsoft, so it doesn't matter. Good on [Country]!

    Surely there is something wrong here. Yes, I know its MS. Yes, I know its scientology but this a stupid reason to suggest not using something, let alone banning it.

    We'd not let anyone suggest not using GNU/Linux just because Linus and the TLA crew[*] converted to some minority, much less becuase line 5329 of Perl was bug fixed by a [cult minority of the week] member.

    Phill

    * ESR, RMS, ETC.

    1. Re:[Country] bans [Vendor's] [OS] distro. by Znork · · Score: 1

      Ah, but what if one of the TLA crew added a couple of lines of code to let them read anything on your disk and/or erase any documents they dont want around? With linux we have the source to discover that, but with Windows we dont.

      So, tell me, do you find it reassuring that a cult that is interested in control and power through a company dedicated to economic espionage and disruption may have coded backdoors into government computers so they can do whatever they want to your personal information? I can certainly understand the german government. Scientology wouldnt be above a little creative messing around with government data. After all, they arent above doing it manually by having sect members doing it.

  64. Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Even if some WTO officials don't want to admit it, but democratic principles, health, culture etc. still matter.

    In Germany (and Austria AFAIK) there are tough, constitutional rules intended to defend democracy and a lawful state. This means groups that aim t undermne the democratic order, like right-wing extremists or extreme communists are banned, and so are references to Nazism etc.
    Co$ is suspected to be a group that intends to destroy the democratic order as defined by the constitution, as these intentions are expressed in their writings.

    Those constitutional principles, based on General Human Rights, are definitely more important than WTO regulations.

    1. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      *references*?

      There's a General Human Right to prevent everybody from possibly offending you with a *reference*?

      C'mon. Even "Wolfenstein 3D" (or was it the Wolf3D homage in _Doom_ ?) got banned, and in Wolf3D the game involved _killing_ Nazis, not helping them...

      Does that strike you as free and democratic?

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a German myself I must admitt that I share my government's view of the danger of Scientology. I remember when our government took position against them and there was an outcry of moral superiority from west of the Atlantic. "What about religious freedom!". There was a time when Germans considered America a roll-modell, but this is no longer the case. We see a country now which has more of it's population behind bars than any other in the western world, a country that allows the sale of guns without hardly any restrictions at all, in short we see the facts. I haven't been to proude about beeing a German, it's just what I am and not an achievement, but lately well just a little bit.

    3. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      C'mon. Even "Wolfenstein 3D" (or was it the Wolf3D homage in _Doom_ ?) got banned, and in Wolf3D the game involved _killing_ Nazis, not helping them...

      The usage of Nazi symbols is illegal in Germany. Period. It doesn't matter in which context. Why should an ignorant software company be treated different than anyone else?

      And why is it, that only we Americans seem to have problems to understand that US law doesn't apply in other countries (how many US citizens have been arrested in Mexico for carring guns?).

    4. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon. Even "Wolfenstein 3D" (or was it the Wolf3D homage in _Doom_ ?) got banned, and in Wolf3D the game involved _killing_ Nazis, not helping them...

      It still featured Nazi symbols, and with any editor you could replace Nazis with Jews...
      (And killing people in a game - no matter how bad they're supposed to be - isn't exactly promoting pacificm and human rights anyway)
      Anyway, given Germany's history it's IMHO a good thing to ban all symbols of this kind - if only to prevent misunderstandings...

      Does that strike you as free and democratic?

      Freedom does not mean you can do what you want regardless of your surroundings. It means you're free to pursue the right things according to your (own!) conscience (and not e.g. infringing the rights and dignity of others). For more insight read Kant or - more recent - Rawls ('A Kantian Interpretation'). It sometimes helps to educate, even as a techie...

      Democracy does not mean to recklessly execute the will of the majority without regard to the minority and Human Rights. This is not about markets but about ethics.

    5. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by coyote-san · · Score: 1

      ... there was an outcry of moral superiority from west of the Atlantic....

      Complete that thought. One of the most notable such outcries, a signed ad in major newspapers, was subsequently denounced by some of the signers. They claimed that they were deliberately misled about the situation and did *not* agree with the CoS after learning the full story. (Unfortunately, since I saw this on a news broadcast I can't recall the name of the people interviewed.)

      Many of the other signers were obviously no different than many of the KKK members of the 1920's-era USA. (Some states had *huge* KKK membership roles - including many minorities - because a few prominent business owners announced that they would only do business with other businesses owned by members of the KKK. As long as they keep their gloves on, and hoods off, they had a lot of "support," but it all evaporated the instant someone called them on their true colors. No pun intended) If you're a movie producer and the agents for Tom Cruise and John Travolta call you and, ahem, suggest that you add your name to what seems to be an innoculous ad, you do so. The alternative is to find the stars are oddly unavailable for your next project.

      Many Americans *do* have mixed feelings about the German actions vis-a-vis the CoS, but we also rank most of the published outcry as being nothing more than a feeble attempt at Hollywood-ized politics.
      Besides, we need our guns in case the CoS actually does somehow get control of a state. :-)

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    6. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You really don't have a clue how things work over here in the US do you. First discard most of what you read/see in the mainstream media. Your ignornace is summed up in this line a country that allows the sale of guns without hardly any restrictions at all. Do you know what kind of restrictions we have or what you must do to get a gun here?
      • no criminal record
      • no history of drug abuse
      • never been diagnosed with a mental disorder
      • back ground check
      • waiting period
      And thats in the least restrictive areas.
    7. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be better to also force the buyer to attend a course with final test on use and safety of firearms. And record who bought what (as for cars and licence plates).

    8. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do you know what kind of restrictions we have or what you must do to get a gun here?
      [...list...]

      So 95% people can still get an arm. And how is one punished if someone else uses his gun ?

    9. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the problem is past restrictions were less stringent? I've read quite astounding figures relating to the number of handguns* held (legally and illegally) by American residents. It seems there are so many anyone can get one second-hand.

      At any rate, if you think American restrictions on handgun sales are severe, try buying one in the UK or Japan! You may be in for a bit of a shock.

      *Rifles are rarely used in criminal activity, so a discussion of `guns' in general is rather misleading.

    10. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems there are so many anyone can get one second-hand.

      Boy, I'd sure like to know where those anti-gun people are finding all these cheap and readily available second-hand guns. I'm tired of paying full price and could sure use the savings.

      At any rate, if you think American restrictions on handgun sales are severe, try buying one in the UK or Japan! You may be in for a bit of a shock.

      And yet both countries still seem to have higher incidents of crime, suicide, and domestic terrorism than the US. I wonder why that is.....

      *Rifles are rarely used in criminal activity, so a discussion of `guns' in general is rather misleading.

      But they're trying to get rid of them too! Once that's accomplished, the ultimate conquest of the US by the likes of Scientology should be trivial.

      People think we don't need guns because "it can't happen here". Well, the reason it can't happen here is because the people here all have guns.

    11. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And record who bought what

      No. Bad Idea. REALLY BAD IDEA! Registration always leads to confiscation. The Germans themselves should know this. Under the Democratic Weimar Republic in Germany, laws were passed requiring all guns in Germany to be registered with the authorities. They did this for the same reasons for which ill-informed people are currently trying to restrict gun ownership in the United States today. They wanted to "reduce crime" and "protect children". The result: the Nazi's, under Hitler, used the list of registered gun owners made during the Democratic Weimar Republic to go door to door confiscating all privately held weapons. And once the German people were disarmed (thanks to 'gun registration' laws passed with the best intentions by the previous government) it took a World War and millions of deaths to remove the Nazi's from power and bring Germany back to freedom. Remember, Hitler may have been freely elected to power, but once he disarmed the German people (thanks to gun registration) there was no way for the German people to un-elect him. For more information, check out Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership.

      Apart from the history lesson, can anyone explain to me exactly how gun registration is going to reduce crime? Nobody has managed yet. Seems to me it's just more fuzzy thinking.

    12. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finished shitting in a bag? How come the US has 6 times as many murders as Europe per head, and a similar ratio of prison populations per head .. . buh duhh because they have LESS crime? Jesus Christ on a Swizzle Stick you from Arkansas?

  65. SET YOUR THRESHOLD LEVEL TO 1 by laetus · · Score: 1

    In your /. preferences, set your threshold level to 1. Then when losers like the original poster get moderated to zero (usually pretty quickly), you'll never even see their inane babbling.

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
    1. Re:SET YOUR THRESHOLD LEVEL TO 1 by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      The one factor that made me hesitate 'bout that is that this will screen out *all* non-moderated AC posts -- which often seem to be ignored by moderators in favor of sometimes less worthy non-anonymous posts, despite the fact that some *do* deserve to be upped...

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:SET YOUR THRESHOLD LEVEL TO 1 by Mike+Monett · · Score: 1

      Clearly, the real problem is the limited range of numbers used to moderate a post. This can be fixed.

      I propose increasing the range from the current level to plus and minus infinity.

      I realize this will create problems when post approaches either limit - it will take the entire computing capacity of the universe to express the number.

      But hey - computers are getting faster every year.

      Also, the actual limits at infinity should be reserved for direct correspondence from dieties and representatives of higher powers.

      These people know who they are, and will have no problem adjusting their level no matter what we do.

    3. Re:SET YOUR THRESHOLD LEVEL TO 1 by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Don't sweat it. The number of worthwhile AC posts that don't get moderated up are small enough to miss, given the large amount of signal (and noise) on /.

      Try it for two days and see if you'll ever go back to threshold=0.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    4. Re:SET YOUR THRESHOLD LEVEL TO 1 by eightball · · Score: 1
      It is up to the conscience as a moderator to voluntarily lower the threshold in order to find the gems.

      As a reader, you do nobody but yourself good or ill from not reading non-moderated AC posts. And I agree with swordgeek in that the signal to noise in a post-moderated discussion aren't worth worring about.

      There is usually little reason to legitimately post anonymously. If they truly want to contribute to the community, I don't think it is too much to ask them to take responsibility (and credit). etc, etc....

  66. There is an easy solution.... by RayChuang · · Score: 1

    Folks,

    It should be noted that Windows 2000 is still quite a ways from being shipped for overseas editions. The North American edition (for US/Canadian use) will ship on February 17, 2000; the versions for European users will probably not ship for at least a month after that.

    There's still time to substitute a different disk defragmenter (or remove it altogether) to comply with German laws. For example, doesn't Symantec make a version of Norton Utilities for Windows NT? This means the German version of Windows 2000 will use Symantec's disk defragmenter instead of Diskkeeper.

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  67. this is a load of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read this article via Babelfish, and I didn't quite catch the bit where it said Windows 2000 was banned in Germany. It seems in german the title has the words "Einn Bann" in it. I don't know how good the translation engine is but what I got the English meaning of the title to be, "Windows 2000 threatens a spell"

    The rest of the article seems to deteriorate into a bunch religious sparkling wine crap, but fortunately (if only for the grounds) Windows 2000 is NOT being banned, at least I wouldn't believe it until I read about it in a more reliable source. The quality of postings on /. seems to be deteriorating these days :(

    WTF do you think a democratic company would ban a software because of the religion of its authors? Get real people. Maybe ITALY or any blatantly Catholic country, but not Germany.. sheesh.

    Happy hakking,
    rohit

  68. Compuserve Germany by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1
    I believe the Compuserve chief was declared innocent (or at least had his sentence removed) only last week.

    For those who doesn't know, German law said that the people who owned the Internet providers were personally responsible for everything that the customers put on the Internet, which lead to the Compuserve boss being sentenced to jail for, I believe, pedophelia (since Compuserve Germany hadn't monitored all Internet traffic in and out and stopped a customer from distributing nude pictures of children)!

    I believe the ban will never be a reality. Good thing too. I have no love for Scientology, but this is absurd.

    ************************************************ ***

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  69. Clarification: church ban not German law by hzo · · Score: 1

    To clarify that Scientology produced disk
    defragmentation thing:

    It is the German catholic church which is opposing
    Windows 2000 because of that piece of software
    This has nothing to do with German government or
    German laws (not yet :)

    As so often, IMHO moral and business are often
    pretty close together. Among moral considerations,
    churches see Scientology as competition for the
    souls and the purses of their faithful.

    The church ban
    was often used in former times to fight against
    individuals which were not in line
    with religious (or political) ideas of those at
    the top of the catholic church.

    More famous people banned were Martin Luther (in 1521),
    who later translated the bible from Latin into a
    living language and queen Elisabeth I of England (in 1570).

    So if you should get banned by accident, you are
    in prominent company :)


    --

  70. Reasonable assessment of threat not paranoia by FreeUser · · Score: 4

    The Germans are concerned about Scientology's well documented track record for

    - suppressing free speach through legal intimidation
    - violating people's privacy through various means, legal and otherwise
    - efforts to gain positions of trust and power
    - willingness to use such positions to promote their own corporate ... ah, religious ... goals

    They are concerned that Scientology is engaged in a power grab of titanic proportions which poses a direct threat to their democracy, which the above pattern of behavior appears to underscore rather clearly. Having a corporation controlled by Scientologists in turn controlling a critical peice of software (such as, say, an integral component of an operating system running on 95% of all PCs) is, they feel, a grave concern.

    OTOH if a scientologist contributes to Linux, the code is under the GPL. This takes control away from the Scientologists and puts it in the hands of the user. I doubt the German government would have any problem with that, though I suspect the hypothetical Scientologist contributing software of this kind might face immediate excommunication for giving away "intellectual" property which could have belonged to The Church. :-) (one must use a very liberal definition of intellectual to include anything written by Hubbard. Talk about horrible science fiction!).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Reasonable assessment of threat not paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Germans are concerned about Scientology's well documented track record for

      - suppressing free speach through legal intimidation

      - violating people's privacy through various means, legal and otherwise

      - efforts to gain positions of trust and power

      - willingness to use such positions to promote their own corporate ... ah, religious ... goals

      Well, duh! The Catholic Church and the German State are, of course, quite innocent of such motives; the Inquisition and the NAZI (most regrettable) excesses didn't really happen.

      At least the Scientologists put out a good product and, for the most part, have waged their war for the planet by reason and by legal means, and for the real betterment of humanity. Every organization screws up from time to time. But Scientology's screw-ups have been strategic rather than morally flawed. Whatever you may think of proprietary religion, it is certainly no worse than proprietary software -- and as long as there remains a legal basis for suppressing illicit copies there will be legal attempts to do so.

      They are concerned that Scientology is engaged in a power grab of titanic proportions which poses a direct threat to their democracy, which the above pattern of behavior appears to underscore rather clearly.

      Whatever else it is, Scientology is not a threat to democracy. Even though its source code is for sale, it is available not secret. Although Scientology admits to a plan for world domination, so does a certain cabal of OS programmers. ;)

      (one must use a very liberal definition of intellectual to include anything written by Hubbard. Talk about horrible science fiction!).

      Are you talking "Battlefield Earth"? I loved it. So did my 12 yr old son.

    2. Re:Reasonable assessment of threat not paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, duh! The Catholic Church and the German State are, of course, quite innocent of such motives; the Inquisition and the NAZI (most regrettable) excesses didn't really happen.

      They did. But today they would be forbidden.

      At least the Scientologists put out a good product and, for the most part, have waged their war for the planet by reason and by legal means, and for the real betterment of humanity.

      Ha! I see ! You are joking.

      (See also www.xenu.net (1) for information about the CoS).

    3. Re:Reasonable assessment of threat not paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, finally we hear the voice of the Cult of $cientology, as filtered through one of their loyal members. At least it's better than all the 'Natalie Portman' sporgery that's been going on.

      Well, duh! The Catholic Church and the German State are, of course, quite innocent of such motives; the Inquisition and the NAZI (most regrettable) excesses didn't really happen.

      Well, duh! yourself. Please remember that those happened years (at least 50) ago and aren't really relevant to the issue at hand. Then again, if your policy is "allways attack / never defend", I guess it's more important to you to hit back than to make your arguement relevant. If relevance is an issue, the Cult of $cientology has been busy much more recently with such things as Operation China Shop, Operation Orange Juice, Operation Funny Bone, Operation Freakout, Operation Snow White, the murder of Lisa McPherson (as well as many others), and far too many other acts of pure evil to mention here (but that you can find here). And while were on the subject of $cientology and the Nazi-ism (you brought it up), don't forget to look here.

      At least the Scientologists put out a good product

      Matter of opinion. I've used both Diskeeper and Norton Utilities. It's my opinion that Norton Utilities is a much better product. I think it's pretty clear where your opinion comes from.

      waged their war for the planet by reason and by legal means

      Haha. Yeah, right. 'Reason'? From the people who brought you Xenu (Galactic Overlord of Distinction). And 'legal'? It sure doesn't look that way from where I'm sitting. Once again, what about Operation Snow White etc.?

      for the real betterment of humanity

      I think these people would disagree. Too bad they can't in person because they're dead.

      Every organization screws up from time to time.

      Thank god the Cult of $cientology screws up from time to time. Think of the evil they could accomplish if they weren't so incompetent.

      But Scientology's screw-ups have been strategic rather than morally flawed.

      Um. No. Maybe by the Cult of $Scientology's own special definition of ethics, but not in the real world. Once again, look at Operation Snow White etc.

      Whatever you may think of proprietary religion, it is certainly no worse than proprietary software

      It is when it kills people. And no, we don't like proprietary software around here either. Choose your arguements more carefully in future.

      Scientology is not a threat to democracy.

      Not while the Cult of $cientology can use the tools of democracy to press it's own totalitarian agenda. Once they do get control, though, watch out! The Germans have special experience with totalitarianism, and they know it when they see it.

      Although Scientology admits to a plan for world domination, so does a certain cabal of OS programmers

      But when we say it, it's a joke. When the Cult of $cientology says it, they mean it. Personally, I'd much rather have Linus in charge if I had to choose. And judging from how it treats its own members I'd have to say the Cult of $cientology is my last choice.

      "Battlefield Earth"? I loved it. So did my 12 yr old son.

      Really? I thought it kind of sucked. Well, actually I though it really sucked. I would think the average 12 year old would have better taste. At 12 years old, I was reading (and enjoying) Heinlein.

      Oh, and before you start branding me as some anti-religious bigot or pawn of the anti-$cientology movement, don't. I like most religions. Comparative theology is one of my hobbies. $cientology is just one of the many religions I've studied, and not even the most evil one at that. It's just currently on topic.

  71. Trying to cover your ass, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since many of the head honchos of the Linux movement are confessing Scientologists, you suddenly find yourself in the akward role of a Micro$oft apologist.

    Good.

    I hope they ban Linux next.

    1. Re:Trying to cover your ass, eh? by Phill+Hugo · · Score: 1

      I care little what religion people subscribe to when I use their software. Would you feel happy if your comments here were removed simply becuase you were [insert discriminatory reason]?

      I am not a Microsoft apologist, nor do I think scientology anything other than complete junk but I do think it stupid to cheer on these sorts of things just becuase it suits one specific purpose. Should that purpose ever be joined by less popular ones (such as the Pope asking that Catholics don't use GNU becuase Stallman is atheist) I'm you'd get the point.

      Phill

    2. Re:Trying to cover your ass, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No they're not! There's some troll on noew claiming that a load of linux developers are scientologists... They're not! He's just making it up. Ignore him... www.xenu.net

    3. Re:Trying to cover your ass, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since many of the head honchos of the Linux movement are confessing Scientologists

      Who then? Give us names. I don't think you can because there aren't any.

  72. the real question here is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well...why doesn't that half baked operating system get a real file system... then maybe they wouldn't need to defrag the bloody thing.


    -- check out todays user friendly comic strip..it's a scream.
    User Friendly

    1. Re:the real question here is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you create a file system that doesn't need to be defragmented?

  73. My Translation by orcrist · · Score: 1

    Note: I am a native speaker of English who has been studying in Germany for 4 years; my German is basically fluent, though my English seems to be degrading ;-)

    My notes are italicized.


    Windows 2000 in danger of being banned

    A component of Windows 2000 comes from a Scientology company. The defragmentation program "Diskeeper" will be released to the market in February as an integrated part of the NT successor. It is being developed by the company Executive Software belonging to (or led by?) the admitted Scientologist Craig Jensen, as reported in c't 25/99. The connection between the (Psyho: here I read psychological, in the sense that it's not just a regular company but based on the philosophy of Scientology) company and the software giant has been a thorn in the eye of sect specialists/observers from the large churches.

    "This will be of interest not only to the Catholic Church, but also to all States (in the sense of 'California is a State'), the Verfassungsschutz (This is the division of the government concerned with protecting the German Constitution), as well as the German industry", commented Harald Baer, the Catholic specialist/agent (person assigned to a certain task; my English is really deteriorating) for sects and worldview (though Weltanschauung is used in English too), to the German Press Agency (dpa). In the view of Ursula Caberta, Chairperson for the Hamburg (the state!) Internal Affairs: Scientology Task-force, Executive Software is one of the leading companies in the Scientology organisation WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises). WISE is the "...key arm/branch of Scientology for infiltrating and spying on the Economy". In the States of Bavaria and Hamburg there are government-policies which forbid agencies -- particularly those in the area of information technologies (basically computers) -- from purchasing services from Scientology companies.



    Chris

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    1. Re:My Translation by nine9 · · Score: 1

      Your translation is very good indeed. I study German too, but I did need to look up quite a few constructions...

    2. Re:My Translation by orcrist · · Score: 1

      Your translation is very good indeed.

      Thank you

      I study German too

      You probably read that sentence a bit too quickly, I study in Germany, Munich to be exact. I don't study German, though I am majoring in Linguistics.

      Chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  74. Re:Many state agencies and companies have policies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, they did. One lesson is to not support organisations with a fascistoid structure.

  75. Another dangerous cult. by sien · · Score: 1

    Personally, I have a lot of sympathy with German laws against scientology. Scientology does do some good, it really does get people dried out, but it also really does people over, a friends brother joined and the whole issue was horrible.

    But I really think another dangerous cult, that of Bill and MS, should also probably be banned in Germany. Chairman Bill has inspired his minions into countless evil acts, and even the US government is being forced to investigate this horrible religion and it's icon "the blue screen" before too much more damage is done.....


    PS ( I really like Natalie Portman )

  76. Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 2000 threatens a spell

    A component of Windows 2000 comes from a Scientology sect company. The Defragmentierungsprogramm " Diskeeper " is to come in February as fixed constituent of the NT successor on the market. It is developed by the company Executive software of the admitting Scientologen Craig Jensen, as reports c't in output 25/99. The connection between the Psycho company and the software giant is sparkling wine-assigned the large churches a thorn in the eye.

    " that will not only interest the catholic church, but also, Harald bear, catholic representative for sparkling wines and world looking questions, in relation to the German press agency (dpa) commentated all Lands of the Federal Republic, the protection of the constitution and also the German industry ". In opinion of Ursula Caberta, chief of the working group Scientology sect that Hamburg interior authority, belongs to Executive software to the prominent enterprises of the Scientology sect organization WISE (World of institutes OF Scientology sect Enterprises). WISE is the " crucial lever of Scientology sect to infiltrate and spy over the economy ". In the Lands of the Federal Republic Bavaria and Hamburg existed resolutions, according to which authorities may not in particular purchase services of Scientology sect enterprises within the area information technology.

  77. Co$ by finkployd · · Score: 2

    I'd really like to know if Andover.net gets any death threats or lawyer threats over this one. The Co$ is a pretty well known cult/terrorist org and has fscked up some people I know (it doesn't pay to try to leave the Co$, kind of like the mafia)

    As for Germany, good for them. If the WTO doesn't like it, fsck them! Germany is a soverign nation and they can do what they want. Sometimes in this messed up world, it's kind of nice to see a country stand up for it's ideals. It's a shame more countries don't take a stand against this money scamming cult.

    Finkployd

    Beware clams, I'm Xenu!

    hehe


  78. Official English Translation by nullspace · · Score: 2

    For those who may want an accurate translation of the article, view this article from the authors of the article: Translation Link.

  79. Sparkling wine :-)) by lgresse · · Score: 1

    Here is the explanation of the sparkling wine stuff. In German, Sekt means a kind of German sparkling wine. Sekte means Sect. Interestingly their plural is similar or quiet close and Babelfish goes wrong... A+ L

    1. Re:Sparkling wine :-)) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is no plural of german "der Sekt". Like theres no plural of "milk". The plural of "die Sekte" is "die Sekten"

      Jörg Dietrich

  80. now that's a twist by arielb · · Score: 1

    Microsoft and Scientology are 2 organizations that try to get you into giving them lots of money. So it's not surprising they'd join together. Anyway, even if this isn't an official ban on W2K, the scientology link is very bad for Microsoft in Germany. I'm sure alot of people here in the US and around the world are also disgusted by this cult. Also, a modern file system shouldn't defrag, period.

    --
    ---
  81. Scary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ahhhhh....I use Diskeeper all the time, and loved it up until now. I had no idea the Scientologists owned Executive Software, and the notion really scares me. Welp, I have copes of Diskeeper Workstation, Diskeeper Server, Undelete Workstation, and Undelete Server that now need to be burned! At least they were free complements of Executive. Man, Bill's gotta be QUITE pissed about this one. A goddamn disk defragmenter is fucking him up. Of course if he just engineered a better file system or had M$ write their own deframenter none of this would happen.

  82. You thought BabelFish was bad? Try GPLTrans... by pnot · · Score: 1
    Since GPLTrans' German translations are working now, I thought I'd give it a go. Giving it the URL didn't work, so I cut-and-pasted, and three minutes later GPLTrans came up with this:

    Windows 2000 impends truncated Bann one component from Windows 2000 stammt from einer Scientology-Firma. that Defragmentierungsprogramm "Diskeeper" desired im february than fester ingredient des NT-Nachfolgers to come onto the market developed becomes it from the inc Executive software des bekennenden Scientologen Craig Jensen, as c't into issuance 25/99 refered. tue chaining among dem Psycho-Konzern and dem Softwareriesen is Sektenbeauftragten the großen churches truncated thorn im eye. "Das becomes doesn only tue katholische church interessieren, sondern also all Bundesländer, den... etc. etc.

    Not quite useable yet then. I have my doubts about the effectiveness of brute-force word lookup, no matter how many people you have adding to your database.

    1. Re:You thought BabelFish was bad? Try GPLTrans... by geert · · Score: 1
      Brute force word lookup is especially difficult with German because German words can be concatenated infinitely to form new German words. In English they just put all words sequentially, while in German they concatenate.

      Every time I want to look up in the dictionary a German words that's longer than 10 characters, I have to split it in parts and look them up separately. This doesn't happen with French and English. And Dutch is something in between :-)

    2. Re:You thought BabelFish was bad? Try GPLTrans... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dutch was derived from Mittelhochdeutsch (I don't think there is an appropiate English term; literal translation: middle-high-German) during the last few centuries.

  83. This news made my day by leereyno · · Score: 3

    As an ex-scientologist news like this just makes me laugh with joy. Scientology is an evil cult whose goal is to take over the world and imprison or kill anyone who doesn't agree with them. Anyone who has spent any time in it can tell you that. Just look up the Fair Game PL. Scientology claims to be a religion but in fact the religious trappings it puts on are for PR and legal protection. It's no more a religion than Amway is. It's true nature is more like the Nazi party of the 1930's. If anyone could recognize this, its the Germans.

    Many scientologists as individuals are decent honest people. Its unfortunate that they have made such a poor choice in remaining in the "church." I could go on all day long about them, but many others have already covered it and more eloquently than I could.

    What is the difference between Scientology and Microsoft? One is an evil cult bent on world domination and the other was begun by L. Ron Hubbard.

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  84. Theres some sound reason in this, really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...bear with me on this one. Germany is one of the few gubbamints' that actually bothered to investigate scientology a fair bit. What they found as far as I can figure is that they are a psuedo doomsday cult, and aren't above helping the doom along a little. The idea is that they might be motivated to *intetntionally* put malicious code into their programs. Since W2K has had a defragger since at least RC1 (and needed it since NT 3.5 as any NT admin could tell you!) and will have it in the final release... Even though I love linux like the rest of slashdot, by the end of 2000 (BTW, the 'true' end of scmillenium: 11:59 12.31.00 :) there will be a fair share of W2K installed arund the world. Now, could you imagine if the friendly little app that microsoft ingested just happens to have a timer in it? BOOM bzzzzzzt /delete/ OR, how about data mining? The scientologist love to gather dirt on people and use it to get their way, a la Hoover and his Female Body Inspectors. Microshit might not have gotten the source to it, or it might be under control by a department or whatever composed of mainly people who worked/owned the previous company. Either way, the shitologists likely have access and control to the code. Ok I know its paranoid, but this is the 'reasoning' behind restricing software used. Its similar to most agencies having 'quality control' and specifications (like US of A's infamous C2 level requirements) dictation what will and won't be installed. Maybe some gubbamints out there will realize *anyone* could put what they want in the code...and demand Open Source :) Buh Bye M$ in respective country if anyone ever puts that particular 2+2 together ;)

  85. Re:L. Ron Hubbard by Khan · · Score: 1

    heh...this is the most intelligent post yet! I bet the clams are squirming all over the place concerning this post. Too fscking bad for them ;)

    --

    "Klaatu, verada, necktie!" -Ash

  86. What is scientology? (sp?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing like typing in random URLs, I was quite amazed when this worked:

    www.scientology.com

    Then, when you are done there, clean your mind at:

    bitch.shutdown.com

  87. Re:Germany banning material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just for clarification: It's the US who still operates gas chambers. Germany even doesn't have the death penalty, they are not so barbaric any more.

  88. But it IS already sold in Germany by MS · · Score: 1
    Look here:

    http://www.btb-online.de/software/dkp 40wi.htm

    Diskeeper is already sold in Germany, so why would it be a problem for Microsoft to sell it as well?

    :-)
    ms

  89. I don't doubt it. by leereyno · · Score: 1

    Natalie Portman in addition to being talented and gorgeous, is also from Israel. Scientology isn't exactly fond of Jews even though it doesn't promote this aspect of the belief system. Truthfully they are not fond of anyone or any group that isn't tied to scientology. Anything outside of the Co$ is considered inferior or corrupt and is generally called "wog" which is a british term equivalent to "nigger."

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  90. They did it to Mission impossible by JagerMeister · · Score: 1

    When Mission impossible came out, I remember the german people and the church boycotting the film becasue Tom Cruise is a Scientologist, and as a result it did poorly in German. And since the scientologist movement is still alive, I can only imagine that anti-scientologist sentiment will strengthen.

    --
    ---- Say thank you to Dr. Pickel
    1. Re:They did it to Mission impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When Mission impossible came out, I remember the german people and the church boycotting the film becasue Tom Cruise is a Scientologist, and as a result it did poorly in German.

      Well, this is how Scientology put it. It did poorly simply because the movie was bad. And regarding church boycotting it: Which church? There is no state church in Germany, and esp. young people (the target audience of the movie) give a damm about any church.

      Whenever I read such statements I can not avoid to think about what's wrong with the mass media in the US.`? Is an Elvis-shaped potato in Ohio really more important news than some objective information about the rest of the world?

      Most so called knowledge seems to come from PR campains, movies, and comic books.

  91. Open vs Closed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of folks are saying that it is ridculous to ban software from a group like the Co$, the same might happen to Linux, given the diversity of it's authors.

    This ignores one small fact. Linux is open, W2K is not. Given their track record I am made very nervous by anything from the Scientologists going thru every block of my hard disk. I have no trouble at all believing they would exploit this if at all possible. Given that I can't inspect their code, it's enough to make me sure not to buy W2K. Not that I would have anyway :).

    So let's not be so open minded our brains fall out on the floor. It's worth considering if allowing a cult to contribute code to closed systems used worldwide constitutes a clear and present danger to the information infrastructure. To allow *anyone* to contribute safely, it's required that *anyone else* can check for sanity and lack of maliciousness in that code.

    Perhaps a government ban is going too far, but it certainly has publicized the issue. If M$ has an ounce of sense, they will find another defragmenter and end the issue. Otherwise, supporting scientology will just become one more reason to dislike and distrust the software giant.

    This reaction isn't because I find the belief system of scientologists obnoxious, I find most religious beliefs slightly obnoxious. This is because past *actions* by this group have convinced me they have ulterior motives and know no limits other than pure self-interest.

  92. The bigger point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many German companies have operations outside of Germany. How many will upgrade to Win/2k outside of germany if they can't do it at home? How many other non-german companies will also hold off?

  93. Damnit!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sick and freaking tired of slashdot defaulting to 'html formatted' !!!

    I write friggin html all day long, and do not want to see another goddamn when I'm posting!

    /grumble/ And the pref wont let me specify plain text as default! Noooooooooo b/c I'm *anonymous* and for a good god damn reason to, my ass would be fired if the wrong person read.

    We need a 'registered but post anon with prefs on and Score: 1' very badly.

  94. They beat the IRS at their own game by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    > You really have got to wonder about a cult that can scare the IRS into submission.

    Not really. They just
    a) moved all their money off-shore, outside the jurisdiction of the IRS (hence legally being external to the Internal Revenue Service), and
    b) then adopted tactics of the IRS by spreading misinformation, fear, intimidation and harrassment. Of course paying off a few IRS people helped too.

    What you have to be scared of is your friends and loved ones being brainwashed by the cult.

    Cheers

  95. L Ron Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When Scientology is outlawed, only outlaws will be Scientologists!

    Oh. I guess that's already the case.

  96. Some points from the full German article by Twinky · · Score: 3
    You can find an English translation of the newsbit on the Heise Server. They promised to post a translation of the full article over the weekend.

    The article contains some more details:

    • Diskkeeper has of course access to the full harddisk.
    • c't could find no obvious hints that the software is spying.
    • Of course you can only be sure when you have the source.
    • Microsoft, it seems, has the code.
    • Microsoft's Recommendation (to uninstall Diskkeeper) is not working. The files will be restored by the `System File Protection' (SFP).
    It will be worth to wait for the translation. It will contain some more background information.
    1. Re:Some points from the full German article by platypus · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's Recommendation (to uninstall Diskkeeper) is not working. The files will be restored by the `System File Protection' (SFP).

      Oh my, I thought all the time that this SFP thingy will be a major pain in the ass, seems like I was right.

    2. Re:Some points from the full German article by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      The worst is how it insists on reinstalling *fonts* that you have uninstalled. I don't know how or why the "MS Comic Book" font is a system file, but there it keeps reappearing.

      Plus no configuration interface that I can see, not even in the registry. Another software victory for MS.
      --

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    3. Re:Some points from the full German article by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Plus no configuration interface that I can see, not even in the registry

      WHAT THE F***!?! This is even scarier than I thought. Undeletable trojans, here we come...

  97. Re:FIRST POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus Christ, dude!

    Lay off the Natalie Portman Fucker. He's not bad!

  98. CmdrTaco watched by a private dick... by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 3

    Scientology agents are watching my house

    Slashdot | Posted by CmdrTaco on 1999-0-0
    from the just-because-you're-paranoid dept.

    About twenty minutes ago, a gang of three Scientology agents collected outside Taco Mansions. They tried to harass one of my visitors when they arrived, telling them that I was hosting child pornography and was a convicted felon. If anyone's in the XXX area just now, you might like to come and look, they're on the corner of XXX and XXX. I've posted PNG images of them *here*. I could use some backup on this one.

    Cheers,
    CmdrTaco.

    No, I don't think the Co$ would be stupid enough to try that one. The Commander is far from powerless.
    --

    1. Re:CmdrTaco watched by a private dick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I don't think the Co$ would be stupid enough to try that one.

      You might be surprised. Their past behavior tends to make one think they are stupid enough to try it. Check out Operation Foot Bullet for more info.

  99. Here's part of the reason ...... by taniwha · · Score: 3
    After WW2 the Allies left the Germans with a constitutions that bans organisation which plan world domination .... which just happens to be one of $cientology's goals (well that and chasing away all the space aliens that are haunting them).

    This is one of the main reasons that Germany is down on Scientology (that and some real estate scams by its members)

    1. Re:Here's part of the reason ...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      After WW2 the Allies left the Germans with a constitutions that bans organisation which plan world domination

      This is historically not correct (hell, the moderation system gets worse recently). The German constitution (actully, until the reunification ten years ago, it was formally not even a constitution), was not given by the allies. The so called Grundgesetz (basic law, fundation law), was written by Germans. A lot of them were victims of the Nazi regime.

      The fact that it is much different than e.g. the US constitution, the British, or the Frensh one (you don't want to have the sovejt union one of that time at all, do you?) demonstrates that not a particular constitution of the allies was used and copied.

      It is actually one of the brightest moments in German democracy that the constitution was written by Germans, for Germans, and brought into effect by the German people, not by some allied ruling.

      Of course the democratic allies insisted on and supported the process of getting a democratic constitution. For sure, they didn't left the Germans with one. When the Grundgesetz was signed and proclaimed in 1949, all the allies still hang around in Germany. Hey, they didn't even leave until today (ok, ok the sovjet union is gone) :-)

    2. Re:Here's part of the reason ...... by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      nono you got that all backwards! Co$ _likes_ the eenie aliens insides us all! (Thetans), more thetans=more happy, kinda like Parasitic Smartdrugs.

      Hugs SlashDread

    3. Re:Here's part of the reason ...... by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      "US constitution, the British, or the Frensh one "

      If I remember correctly, and I may not, the British don't have a Constitution in the way the US does because they work on the concept of common law.

      I could be wrong, could a English-person or someone with more of a clue clerify this for me.

      As for the rest of the post, I pretty much agree with it. I mean, people have different biases, and some people have an unfortunate history that some think will (and may) repeat itself.

      bye

      --
      Dan
    4. Re:Here's part of the reason ...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no single constitutional document in the United Kingdom, but there are a number of statutes which hold constitutional status. The oldest of these is the Magna Carta (1215), and the most recent is the House of Lords Act 1999 (1999). Critically, however, the constitutional status of such statutes is based entirely on unwritten convention. A parliamentary majority could theoretically change any of them on a whim, but this isn't done because they are viewed as constitutional.

      Some would argue the House of Lords Act 1999 was ill-considered, but the general view is it should be improved upon, not repealed. This reflects the fluidity of the constitution, which has been continually evolving, more or less, for nearly 800 years.

      If I remember my history correctly, the root cause of (or pretext for) the American War of Independence was that taxation of the American colonies by Parliament was said to violate the constitution. Specifically, the claim was it violated of the Petition of Right (1628), which states that taxation of any sort requires the common consent of the people (broadly speaking), as represented by parliament. In so far as colonial populations didn't (and don't) return MPs or peers to parliament, it was argued there could be no common consent. Widespread sympathy with this claim is one reason the American War of Independence is generally viewed as having been a just war (in the UK and USA), even if there were less noble motivations behind it as well. It is also an example of the conventional view which holds that certain statutes carry constitutional status, while others do not.

      An example which illustrates the superiority of precedent and convention over written statute is the royal veto. The Glorious Revolution of 1688 affirmed the sovereignty of parliament, though the monarch retained the power to veto legislation. Within twenty years, however, even the veto had ceased to exist in practice, though it remains on the statute books to this day. Ironically, this theoretical executive veto was carried over into the American system, where it was brought back into use.

    5. Re:Here's part of the reason ...... by lordsutch · · Score: 2

      (you don't want to have the sovejt union one of that time at all, do you?)

      Actually, the Soviet Union had a fairly liberal constitution (as does the People's Republic of China). However, it (obviously) was not followed in practice.

      --
      My Blog. Sela Ward can sell me long distanc
  100. What is this all about? by omnifrog · · Score: 1

    I've been a reader of /. for about 6 months. Normally everyone is honest, direct, and polite. What is up with this "Natalie Portman" thing? Where can I find a history lesson? Thanks

    1. Re:What is this all about? by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 2

      I've been a reader of /. for about 6 months. Normally everyone is honest, direct, and polite. What is up with this "Natalie Portman" thing?

      It's been explained in a few other threads, but just in case you missed them, here's what happened:

      Humour site Segfault recently had to disable user comments because the system was being abused; a number of people were posting obscene comments about Natalie Portman and Mae Ling Mak. Every story on Segfault ended up with obscene comments attached to it.

      Because Segfault no longer allows commenting, the idiots who posted such comments appear to have migrated en masse to this site. At least we have moderators who can do something about this abuse.

      -Stephen (who had never even heard of Mae Ling Mak before the Segfault fiasco, and still hasn't got a clue who she is)

  101. To cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were fucking natalie portman you would call her by her real name. Not the one you see on the magazine covers and the fansites.

  102. What is a church? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The central question about scientology is whether it is considered a church or not. While the US constitution protects basically everything that calls itself a church, this is not the case in many different countries. In germany scientology is not considered a church but an organisation with a clear financial purpose. However, there are laws that prohibit some form of moneymaking and scientology uses some of them. That's where the illegal stuff comes in.

    1. Re:What is a church? by Cullison · · Score: 1

      I dunno, an income tax for churches seems kinda like a money making scheme to me. Seems the Catholic and Lutheran churches are living pretty high on the hog in Germany. Those two churches own more land than any company or organization in Germany except the German government. And it was the NAZIS who originally instituted that tax for those two churches, to buy them off. If the leaders of those churches had any shame at all for the activities of their predecessors for allowing the Holocaust to occur... well, if it were me, I'd have refused to accept any such money collected! But, we are talking millions and millions of deutschmarks, and, well... it's nice work if you can get it. Furthermore, German COURTS OF LAW have recognized Scientology as a religion. Dozens of times. What form of money-making is outlawed? Scientology derives income from services and from materials (books, tapes, etc.). Now, surely certain jurisdictions have tried to outlaw the ways that Scientology promotes itself and gets income, but these were not illegal until those jurisdictions decided to try to find ways to destroy Scientology -- and even German courts have found that such laws were themselves unconsitutional! So, please, enlighten us.

    2. Re:What is a church? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      be enlightened:
      This is not about religion. Here you have a cult that has the goal to get world domination without respecting human rights or the law of the current society and has a record for collecting information ILLEGALLY to blackmail any opponents or just non-believers who argue against its beliefs.
      You think it's smart to use closed software they coded to handle sensitive data? Like your legal files, your income-tax-report, the files at your doctors practice?
      Such data could be used if gathered through a backdoor to tell lies with a little core of truth about you, making it impossible for you to defend against it. Esp. if used with such force as CoS shows in such cases. What if there is a backdoor in it? a defrag-tool has admin-rights and therefor unlimited access to your harddrive.

    3. Re:What is a church? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The church taxes are collected from members of that particular church and then given to the church. This is almost the same thing, as giving the money to the church directly (like donations). If you are not member of the Lutheran or Catholic church, you don't pay money for the church. This is something like the church-state separation in the US: While there is no church-state relation, the opening of Congress is with a prayer and the In God We Trust stuff on money. About the illegal stuff: if there are too many complaints, the state has the duty to look into it (even if it is a so called church...) Then there is the protection of the state, organisations (nazis and scientolotist) want to overthrow the state. So it is only logical, that the state defends itself. A funny side not: the secret service of scientoloy is "outsourced" since members are too crazy to do it themselves...

  103. what next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    wow, first the pentium III's won't be used by the EU because they're NSA tracking devices, and now windows 2000 is an evil scientologist conspiracy?

    euros! cast away the shackles of wintel and install linux NOW!

  104. Microsoft code reviews by daviddennis · · Score: 2

    You know, if they didn't have any, it might explain a few things :-)

    Seriously, the Church of Scientology is a nasty group of people. I don't know how comfortable I am with a connection between them and the software platform virtually everyone has to use at some point.

    D

    ----

    1. Re:Microsoft code reviews by DanMcS · · Score: 2

      Seriously, the Church of Scientology is a nasty group of people. I don't know how comfortable I am with a connection between them and the software platform virtually everyone has to use at some point.
      OK, I don't like the CoS's practices. But the fact that a software writer happens to be a Scientologist has no bearing on his program's utility. Do you seriously think that using a program written by a Scientologist's company will harm you in some way? Maybe it will give you Scientologist germs, and you might catch Scientology and turn into one yourself! Oh no! heh. If it's the best tool for the job, use it.

      --
      Communication is only possible between equals
    2. Re:Microsoft code reviews by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      Oh, not in those terms, no.

      But they do have an interesting record infiltrating various organizations, so the thought that a Scientology-sourced program might send confidential data to the Church would not be out of line.

      I realize it sounds absurd, but crazier things have happened - check the history of this bizarre organization before dismissing it out of hand.

      D

      ----

  105. ENGLISH VERSION OF ARTICLE... by Bananenrepublik · · Score: 2

    is here. That link has been obviously added later at the bottom of the original German article.

  106. New moderation needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think after today /. should implement a new caetegory, (-1 Scientologist)

  107. Re:You people are idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're so fanatical about something as unimportant as an operating system for a damned PC that you cheer when a government freely interferes in religious expression, or you cheer on an oversized, greedy government tries to regulate the US software market by claiming Microsoft has an OS monopoly when clearly (by definition) they do not. Knobs.

  108. constitution by emmons · · Score: 1



    ahhh, i love americans. (yes, I am american too)
    We're so ignorant about the world. Hmm, let me start. Firstly, the EU doesn't care if germany censors films, software, etc. They'd be delighted... two reasons: germany is the EU, and the EU stays away from domestic issues as to not piss off any of the member states.

    "this amounts to state censorship, and should not be tolerated"

    Well cowboys, germany ain't the good 'ol US. They have their own constitution. And it allows state censorship. And ask any german, they like it that way. *my god! they like it you say!* Yes, they like it. You cannot show a film in germany depicting nazis as good people for society. Nazis cannot organize anything. You cannot be a nazi. (it's legal but you won't live long)

    "Also, do the German government intend to ban all John Travolta (or any other star related to the Scientologist) films?"

    Well, at least you get relative freedom of religion here. But weather or not it's a religion is up to the government to decide. The church and state are not seperate here. There are 3 religion classes in the public schools. You can choose catholic, lutheran or neither/none (ethics). You must take one. If you want to be catholic or lutheran you pay a tax that goes to the church. Otherwise you don't get married or buried by them. I think the tax is a 2% income tax. *what's that you say? no seperation of church and state! my god!*

    hmm. what else should we nice americans learn today? oh yeah. porn is legal. so is alcohol. A 16 year old can go to a grocery store and legally buy a condom, porn mag, beer and a pack of camels. And he can enjoy them too. But if the light doesn't work on his bike when he rides home the police will stop him, give him a ticket for the light and tell him to have a fun night.

    Know a little about another society before you start saying what they can and can't do, would ya please?



    Now if you would please excuse me, I'm going to eat dinner, go to the pub and have a good german ale. I'm 17 and it's legal.



    -----

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    1. Re:constitution by nhowie · · Score: 1

      ahhh, i love americans. (yes, I am american too)

      I am not American, see the '.co.uk' bit in my URL. Hence the RMS/communist dig. Don't assume things like that, and don't write such patronising crap in your posts (this applies to much of the post).

      Firstly, the EU doesn't care if germany censors films, software, etc. They'd be delighted... two reasons: germany is the EU, and the EU stays away from domestic issues as to not piss off any of the member states.

      You got the bit about Germany being the EU right at least, but what planet do you live on if you think the EU stays away from domestic issues??? Anyways, W2K is an American product, so if it had been an outright ban (my apologies for that mistake), then it would not be a 'domestic' issue, also I thought the EU liked pissing off members states other than Germany (Not that the UK is at all bitter;)

      And why bring up the nazis? The attrocities committed by the nazis are something that should not be forgotten, but that's no reason to treat all "subversive" groups the same way. As dangerous as the Scientologists might be, I don't think they're even in the same league as the nazis.

      It doesn't matter anyway, since I got the wrong end of the stick about the 'banning' bit.

    2. Re:constitution by emmons · · Score: 1

      my apologies, I should have checked your web address. I don't want to insult you, but your post did sound quite american.

      The thing I brought up about the nazis had to do not with them but with the fact that the government can sensor. And yes, in the case of nazi propoganda it is a very good thing.

      When I said the EU doesn't care about domestic issues, I mean it tries not to get into issues unique to each state, unless of course major human rights violations are being made. As I uderstand it the EU is primarily for trade and economic unification, with the added benefit of giving europe more weight in international affairs.

      I apologize, I went off a bit when I read the part about "this amounts to state censorship, and should not be tolerated". I assumed it was another arrogant american assuming everyone has the first amendment. I went overboard with the sarcasm too.

      -----

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    3. Re:constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since when was porn illegal?

    4. Re:constitution by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      First of all: EU law overrules federal German law as German federal Law overrules state Law. Each country has five years to adopt the EU ruling to their laws.

      Speaking of Germany is the EU. It's only insofar correct, that most rulings aren't ratified, if Germany doesn't approve. Did you notice the word "most"?

      Furthermore, not a single EU law gets ratified, without every single of the fifteen nations approving. May it be Germany, Great Britain, or Luxembourgh.As it has been ratified at Maastricht.

      The German goverment has to report to European Court like any other member of the European Union.

      "this amounts to state censorship, and should not be tolerated""

      RTFM (Read the fucking manual) // Will this be censored?

      Taken from http://www.lib.byu.edu/~rdh/eurodocs/germ/ggeng.ht ml

      1. BASIC RIGHTS (A little bit abridged by me)

      Article 1 (Protection of human dignity). (1) The dignity of man is inviolable. To respect and protect it is the duty of all state authority. (2) ... (3) ...

      Article 2 (Rights of liberty). (1) Everyone has the right to the free development of his personality insofar as he does not violate the rights of others or offend against the constitutional order or the moral code. // Plain text: Do what you want as long you don't care to destroy democracy (2) Everyone has the right to life and to inviolability of his person. The freedom of the individual is inviolable. These rights may only be encroached upon pursuant to a law. // You may only sentenced to prison by law

      Article 3 (Equality before the law). (1) ... (2) ... (3) No one may be prejudiced or favored because of his sex, his parentage, his race, his language, his homeland and origin, his faith or his religious or political opinions. // Just to emphasize

      Article 4 (Freedom of faith, of conscience and of creed). (1) Freedom of faith and of conscience, and freedom of creed religious or ideological, are inviolable. (2) The undisturbed practice of religion is guaranteed. (3) ...

      Article 5 (Freedom of expression). (1) Everyone has the right to freely express and to disseminate his opinion by speech, writing and pictures and freely to inform himself from generally accessible sources. Freedom of the press and freedom of reporting by radio and motion pictures are guaranteed. There shall be no censorship. (2) These rights are limited by the provisions of the general laws, the provisions of law for the protection of youth and by the right to inviolability of personal honor. (3) ....

      Article 18 (Forfeiture of basic rights). Whoever abuses freedom of opinion, in particular freedom of the press (Article 5, paragraph 1) .. in order to attack the free democratic basic order, forfeits these basic rights. The forfeiture and its extent are pronounced by the Federal Constitutional Court. // Not by the State // And not the "dignity of man" or "the right to life and the inviolability of his person"

      "(it's legal but you won't live long)" I hope I misunderstood that passage, may it be my inability of english or yours

      "But weather or not it's a religion is up to the government to decide." No, the Court as in any democratic society

      Makes me think of the Palmer Raids and Red Scare. Article 1 might have come handy in this situation. btw. amnesty international lists the US as one of the nations in which the human rights are frequently violated by official action (death penalty, overcrowded prisons)

      "The church and state are not seperate here" Article 140 refers to Article 137 of the Weimar Constitution: There is no state church. ...

      "There are 3 religion classes... "

      What happens in schools lies not in the jurisdication of the government. The states ("Laender") make the school laws. In fact, I didn't have to go to religion classes, most people didn't go, (I did although I'm an atheist)

      AFAIK, in Berlin, nowadays, there is the possibility to go to muslim classes

      "hmm. what else should we nice americans learn today? oh yeah. porn is legal. so is alcohol. A 16 year old can go to a grocery store and legally buy a condom, porn mag, beer and a pack of camels. ..."

      porn is illegal in germany. porn in the sense that the "sexual act is depicted in a noncensual way, brutal, egoistical way, ..."

      Following the article 5 in consideration of Article 2 and 1

      If you consider magazines like Playboy as porn, yes you can buy such magazines being sixteen years of age.

      "..buy a condom..." You even get them for free as presents by parties and others, on the one hand as a reminder on the other hand as a joke.

      There is a four times higher teenage pregnancy rate in the US than in Germany. That makes me think.

      Don't tell me, just because it's illegal teenager, don't drink in the states.

      "Know a little about another society before you start saying what they can and can't do, would ya please?"

      Isn't that ironic? What is more dangerous incomplete/incorrect knowledge or no knowledge at all?

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  109. Wrong question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The question is "who may buy it?"

    There are rules which would prevent certain parts of the government to buy Windows 2000/Diskeeper. The products may be sold ...

  110. Glad to find this out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can count on Executive/CO$ products NOT being used on any systems that I admin...

  111. My favorite line from the translation by Steelehead · · Score: 1

    The connection between the Psycho company and the software giant is sparkling wine-assigned the large churches a thorn in the eye.

    --
    -- 100% MS-Free as of 4-4-1999, 11:47:38 PST. "The lapdance is always better when the stripper is cryin'" Free Kevin,
  112. Re:It's a "Bann", better believe it. by mazur · · Score: 2
    And come on, let's get real: You don't seriously believe that anyone in the goverment would stop Microsoft from shipping Windows 2000 to Germany, are you?

    I, for one, do believe that: when a user of xs4all in the Netherlands published a copy of the German forbidden radical-left magazine Radikal on his homepage, the German government instituted a ban to all of xs4all from Germany, which got widespread implementation, thereby also banning access to Dutch writer Karin Spainks anti-Scientology pages one the same site. So I don't see why a ban on Windoze Y2K would not be similarly accepted and followed. xs4all sued, but I can't remember the outcome.

    --
    The truth shall make you fret. (Ankh-Morpork tImes motto)
  113. duh yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I can never see this standing up!

    Yeah, it's not like Germany is an autonomous country with its own laws (What? it is? how dare they not abide by the US Constitution!?!?)

  114. Executive Crapware by thermal_noise · · Score: 1

    Much better to use the excellent free stuff from www.sysinternals.com for all of us who are stuck with at least one Windows machine at work.

  115. Re:this is a load of crap - no it is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >WTF do you think a democratic company
    This is probably meant to mean "country". ;-)
    >would ban a software because of the religion
    >of its authors?
    Yes, I think that is perfectly possible. (I am German, so I think I know something about German politics.)
    Scientology is not regarded as a church in Germany but as a criminal organisation trying to subvert companies and governments.
    Note that the article on heise.de is so far only talking about the opinion of a spokesperson of the catholic church.
    But many companies and government agencies have a policy of not buying any services from companies that have connections to Scientology. This is because they are concerned they might get subverted by them. (Which is quite possible, just imagine such a person installing BackOrifice on a database server in a government agency.)

    regards
    Thomas

  116. Re:You people are idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are the idiot. The government is trying to prevent a threat to its very existence, be it religious or whatever. They have every right to do that. You may agree with that or not, but it would be silly for them to let the threat go on, and not interfere. Of course they are not like you so they interfere.

  117. GET AN ACCOUNT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a "post anonymously" button on the post screen if you have an account. I post like 20 times a day, but I usually post anon to protect my 30+ karma and personal privacy.

    Is clicking a checkbox every time you post so hard?

  118. Scientologists writing GPLed software? by lordsutch · · Score: 2

    Would the Germans also ban software under the GPL written by Scientologists? I think it's a fairly safe bet that at least some GPLed code was written by one...

    (This sounds like a non-tariff barrier, rather than a legitimate social concern. Unless the software is designed to convert people into Scientologists, or Nazis, or tree-huggers, I can't see any good reason to ban it.)

    --
    My Blog. Sela Ward can sell me long distanc
  119. Co$ in a nutshell by finkployd · · Score: 3

    The Co$ is pretty much a terrorist cult that uses money, lawsuits, and worse to silence opposition. They basically prey on weak minded people and exploit them for money, work, you name it.
    Basically, they are a corporation pretending to be a religion to get tax breaks. There are lots of sites on the net dealing with these people, the largest of which is Operation Clambake. An interesting note is that the Co$ distributes internet software to it's drones that have nearly all of these sites, newsgroups, and such filtered out.

    Finkployd

    1. Re:Co$ in a nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >...They basically prey on weak minded people...

      That is a manifestation of a tragic mindset -- that of "it can't happen to me" -- IT CAN! Scientology uses many front groups to hide its identity and intentions from the "raw meat", as they call new recruits. Then they use a VERY sophisticated suite of mind-control techniques in their courseware. There's no violence, just some innocent-seeming exercises that put you in a state that is quite receptive to programming.

      By the time the first course is over, they're so thoroughly mindfscked, they generally can't be made to believe they've actually been drawn in.

      Cults in general use some very strong and dangerous stuff. Never believe it can't happen to you.

    2. Re:Co$ in a nutshell by finkployd · · Score: 2

      Have you ever SEEN a Co$ intro video? They can only be described as comedies :) I've visited a local recruiting house and after what I saw and listened to, I still cannot imagine anyone joining with these people.
      However, it's possible that my experience was not representative of how they normaly work.

      Finkployd

  120. A Suggestion Concerning AC's by Kartoffel · · Score: 0

    Rob, Hemos, Neal: how about logging the ip's of AC posters? Just automatically encrypt em and file them away somewhere.

    I realize that abusiveness is a subjective thing. It would be cool if the slashdot administrators could pull up a log somewhere and see that, for example, 123.45.67.89 has posted a hundred AC comments about Natalie Portman in one discussion.

    Keep the logs secure and private, but if it looks like someone is being *seriously abusive*, you could open that person's access rights up to moderation. Create an anonymized track record of every post from the alleged abuser's ip and allow moderators to decide if it's abusive.

    If the moderators give it a thumbs-down, ban the ip.

    Ack! end of rant. Everyone be sure to watch the Mars landing coming up in a few hours. I can't wait!

  121. huh huh huh very funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    huh huh, cow said "Microsoft!" huh huh, he's such a funny and cool guy!

  122. stupidity will out by wmeyer · · Score: 1

    Come on, people, let's be as intelligent as we think we are. If a company is run by a Mormon, does that make their software Mormon software? The US (mistakenly supposed to have been founded on principles of religious freedom -- it wasn't -- it was founded to let people practice their own flavor of persecution) has long been a hotbed of narrow and provincial thinking. The small town in which I was raised (in Michigan, not the south) was, until the 30s, restricted (no blacks, Jews, or Catholics, thank you.) It only changed because the law made it do so.

    There are good and bad people in every company, country, and religion. Many religions look pretty cockeyed to one not raised within them. All religions look cockeyed to an atheist. Focus on purpose, not packaging.

    Supposedly we hate M$ for their bloated and buggy software, not for their money. Yet the current DOJ action is money-motivated, not anything to do with either merchantibility or fitness of purpose, either of which might provide clear grounds for action against them.

    I have German ancestry. Having said that, I can also say that my German grandfather was the most narrow-minded, hidebound, and opinionated man I knew while I was growing up. Does that make all Germans the same? Of course not.

    On the matter of religion, I believe in a Creator. I do not believe in organized religion. I dislike Churches for the same reason I dislike M$ and governments: large organizations typically give rise to petty tyrants and corruption. In smaller organizations they have nowhere to hide while amassing their power.

    Software is written by people, not by churches. From what I know, Executive Software is a company motivated by commercial desires, as is M$, as is Be, Inc., as is Red Hat. If we do not care about the religious beliefs of Bob Young, or of Jean Louis Gasee, why then should we care about the religious beliefs of Craig Jensen?

    A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Let's not waste ours on the ignorance of persecution and paranoia.

    --
    --- Bill
  123. freedom's cost is misfits by peter303 · · Score: 1

    We see that on the internet- unpopular groups
    have their say, so that everyone can use it
    openly and cheaply.
    The German Government doesn't get what freedom
    is about if this article is true.

  124. Might want be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientology heads are known for going after sites which say anything bad about them, be intresting to see them go after /. :) All /. has do is advertise one of thier websites to shut it down :)

  125. death threats by prok · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, the dark practices of the "Church" of Scientology. My high school German teacher had a great story about scientology. Back in his younger days, he angered the church enough that they declared him officially dead. So somewhere in the churches files, there is record of my teacher's death, even though he is quite alive to this day. (apparently he was supposed to die after they declared him dead... don't ask)

    I dunno, people like that freak me out. The German govt. is right to be suspicious of them even if their measures may seem extreme at times.

  126. Why start with Windows 2000? by Jonathan+C.+Patschke · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, the filesystem-inspecific optimization routines present in Windows NT had been written by Executive Software back for NT 3.51 Service Pack 2. From what I remember, to run Diskeeper on Windows NT 3.51 (or was it 3.5?), you needed to install an Executive-software specific kernel to replace the Microsoft-standard Windows NT kernel. The Executive Software kernel added a few NT-native function calls that talked directly to the filesystem drivers to move blocks of data around and return various statistics (the sort of which generally aren't of interest to software running atop to OS, but vital to the OS itself). Basically, it was a layer of abstraction that let priviledged processes talk to the FS drivers through a standard interface (sort-of like ioctl()IIRC, Microsoft thought that this was a good enough idea (so that someone else could also write a defragmenter for NT) to include in the Microsoft kernel in a certain service release of NT 3.51 (I think it was either SP2 or SP3). Those functions were carried over into Windows NT 4.0. So basically, all versions of Windows NT since 3.51 SPwhatever have had some code written by Executive, albeit not as much as a whole defragmenter. Why now is the German government upset? Is there a lines-of-code limit to how much Scientolgist-written code may exist within a product?

    --
    Pining for the days when The Glorious MEEPT!!! graced SlapDash with his wisdom.
  127. Dose this seem disturbing to anyone else by RevS.A.S. · · Score: 1

    To me it seems a more than a little worrisome that a government wold try to suppress software just because of the religious belief of its programmers. I'm sure the Nazis thought they were justified in oppressing the Jews to. Oppressing religious freedom is the first step on a slippery slope. If the software works and people want to buy it than it should be available.

    --
    I Tell You: One must still have chaos in one to give birth to a dancing star! -Nietzsche
    1. Re:Dose this seem disturbing to anyone else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. Unless Money is a god, CoS is NOT a religion

      2. Your reply is typical for CoS people, especially when it gets to making silly comparisons and references to Nazi Germany.

      3. If a self-proclaimed religious movement is a threat to society, than oppressing it is justified - unless you are a member of this movement itself of course.

  128. Re:You people are idiots. by Osty · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I was reading a different article than you, but where did it say anything about "[preventing] a threat to its very existence"? Methinks you're the one who has it all wrong.

  129. Hypocrits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scientology use Germany's history as a coward tactic to defend themselves. They blame that Germans are nazi's and all that. How about The American Nazi Party? How hypocrit. Germans' history has nothing to do with the evil influence that Scientology wants to spread across the world.

  130. W2000. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adding more fuel to the fire! Just another reason to boycott M$ and go w/Linux. Would I trust my hd to a spy organization? Esp. one w/reputation that Scientology has? NO WAY!

  131. good thing by bertuzry · · Score: 1

    at least on country has done the right thing and ban microsoft

  132. What would replace Win 2000? by GECK · · Score: 1

    Well, if Windows 2000 were banned, what would the German government use? Slackware? :)

    --
    http://www.livejournal.com/users/whiskeyjuvenile/
  133. he shoulda stuck to SF by dickens · · Score: 1

    As Isaac Asimov said (in his autobio), L. Ron Hubbard should have stuck to Science Fiction. Some of it is pretty good. Asimov could already see that Scientology was a "bad thing". Personally, I only got about half-way through the scientology book before I concluded that these people were psuedo-science spouting lunatics.

    And on another note, if you're lucky enough to have an NT workstation that is stable for several years without DisKeeper, you will be very happy you bought DisKeeper.

    It was a no-brainer for MS to buy DisKeeper, or the rights to it or whatever. It's badly needed on any seriously active NT (FAT or NTFS) file system.

  134. NOt banned.. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Please note.. this is about government 'banning' the use of w2k in ITS OWN OPERATIONS, not banning it from public use or from entering germany.

    This is not much different than other corporations who have certain rules about what kind of software is permitted.

  135. NOT BANNING IT! by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    People, they are possibly banning the use of w2k in government operations, not banning it from sale in the country.

  136. MOD UP the post above! by cymen · · Score: 1

    MOD UP the post above!

  137. GPLtrans isn't CLOSE to being finished by ToastyKen · · Score: 2

    It has a REALLY smart database of phrases right now, since it's getting started.
    But that's no reason to be against it.. it's just that it needs a lot more work.

    However, in addition, it uses a simply phrase-replacement algorithm that I don't hope to much hope in...

  138. Re:I am Natalie Portman by Gideon00 · · Score: 1

    heh obviously? Did they leave a hair or something? Or was their choice in few words a dead giveaway?

  139. I'm a Scientologist, I've GPL'ed tons of my code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact, the GPL is very compatible with the ideals of Scientology. It may not seem like it is but if you were a Scientologist, you'd know different.

    I've been quite happy to have contributed over the years to the Linux efforts by GPL'ing my code, working with others on making Linux a great tool for computers, and generally being a part of what I consider to be a great social movement, just like Scientology.

    You don't know who I am, but you'd probably change your views on Scientology if you did. But it is exactly the sort of bigotry being demonstrated by the German nation - not a nation particularly well known for it's ability to maintain a fair and just society - that leads me to continue my anonymity.

    So don't get hypocritical about Scientology and the German government. It could be you in the same boat, Mr. Open Source Developer, evil baddy of the computer world, making life difficult for Microsoft.

    You probably know more good Scientologists than you think you do, and one of these days you'll be surprised to learn that what you think you know about us as a group is only what you've been taught to believe.


    On the face of things, the GPL may not be compatible with the trademarks of Scientology - for good reason. If it weren't for the fact that we protect our rights to our religion vigorously, we would not be as strong a group as we are - many infiltration attempts have been made by US and other government agencies, and all have been thwarted.

    The battle in Germany over Scientology is not what it appears to be... you may think you know, but all you know is what you've read. And that's not always the truth.

  140. Re:he shoulda stuck to SF ... naaa he sucked ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I read "Battlefield Earth" by Ron Hubbard. It was O.K.at the begin, but soon after it becomes really boring, and stupid. I did finish the book, but I'm not going to read anymore of his writings. In my opinion he was really a very bad writer.

  141. Deep Six by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    Suggestion for posts that are of interest only to masochists and (meta)-moderators. Use something like 3 strikes (3 independent deep six moderations) to effectively kill the post. Shouldn't use moderator points, but should be near unanimous agreement by meta-moderators.

  142. Re:FIRST POST! by barleyguy · · Score: 1

    #244, this has got to be a record for first posts!!! Fricking idiot!

    --
    --- "So THAT's what an invisible barrier looks like!" - Time Bandits
  143. Argggh by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    Subject: Deep Six (Score: -6)
    got changed to (Score:1)
    This time I'll try preview first.

  144. W2K, the Comic Book OS by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    Thanks, you just made my day.

  145. Smart Germans! by seaportcasino · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm starting to love Germans more and more! Forget about that little World War II thing. You guys are ok in my book! Hell, what am I saying, I'm part German!

  146. Microsoft's freedom to innovate. by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    Thanks, you just put it into perspective.

  147. Re:You people are idiots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The scientologists use hypnosis on iundividuals and extortion on groups to undermine the democratic process and install their own puppet leaders.

  148. Re:Bad news for RedHat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're not. They're both atheists - as in "There is no God". This can be extended to include thye imaginary space-cooties that crawl on scientologists - there's no rational reason to beleive they exist (or that we're clams). Neither of them are scientologists.

  149. Re:I'm a Scientologist, I've GPL'ed tons of my cod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA has infiltrated scientology. It's now being steered by the US government, mainly as a whole load of dumb f*cks who'll do whatever they say.

  150. It's not a religion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Co$ isn't a religion. It's a scheme to bilk gullible people out of their money, created by a hack science fiction writer.

  151. We sould! And I'm use to be a Moromon. by Jonathan+Hamilton · · Score: 1

    In fact I still attend 10 hours of church a week because I am forced to by my parents. I have gone to church my entire life and started truly questioning the church when i was 14. The false logic that our church uses is amazing.

  152. Open Source Scientology? Not likely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens if members of the Scientology group have contributed to Linux, etc.?

    Probably nothing. The German government seems to mostly be concerned with Scientologist infiltration into their government for the purposes of grabbing power (much like the Nazi's did). They are probably mainly concerned about hidden 'features' in the Scientology written programs contained in Windows2000 transmitting sensitive information about the user (ala' Real Networks) back to Scientology. For an organization with a history of blackmail and deceit like that of Scientology, this is a real concern.

    If the programs were released as open source for linux, this wouldn't be such a concern. Since the German government (and everyone else) would have direct access to the source code, any such compromising 'features' would be detectable and removeable.

    I mean it could happen, couldn't it?

    I seriously doubt it. For one thing, I don't think any Scientologist would be allowed to release software that isn't directly owned and controlled by Scientology. This is especially true if the programmer has signed one of Scientology's infamous Billion Year Labor Contracts (literally the Intellectual Property Contract from HELL). And given the amount of money (>$300k+ per person) that Scientology charges for their services, any software they own the rights to is hardly going to be free software. For another thing, any organization that keeps it's own core beliefs (strange though they may be) as secret as Scientology does, is hardly going to be open about any source code they create.

    In summation: Discordians create Open Source Software. Scientologists do not.

  153. Re:FIRST POST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I change my mind. Two Things. 1) Muppets blow me all the time. 2) I also blow muppets on a regular basis. -cow

  154. IP logging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lock outs by IP are a good idea, except that it probably wouldn't work.

    In all likelihood, the Natalie Portman sporger is probably some kid using his parent's dial up account and does not have a fixed IP. If his IP gets blocked he just dials back in until he gets assigned a different IP. This would probably be enough of an inconvenience that most people would give up. Unfortunately, the people that submit these annoyance posts (by definition) already have way too much free time and are willing to keep dialing back in because they obviously have nothing better to do.

    Meanwhile, someone else with the same ISP could get one of the blocked IP's and be unable to contribute meaningful discourse.

    The best solution, still is to just ignore the twits. Why waste valuable ATP on them? Eventually they will get tired and go back to the kiddy site that spawned them.

    1. Re:IP logging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why waste valuable ATP on them?

      I agree with your logic. However, sir, not every reader of slashdot metabolises via photosynthesis. Readers from the animal kingdom don't run on ATP (adenosine triphosphate). We have other chemicals and apparatus in our cells to make us go (like mitochondria).
      On the other hand, my cells run on midichlorians >:-P

  155. Free guns in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a country [the USA] that allows the sale of guns without hardly any restrictions at all

    Hardly. Very few people realize it, but the fact is that every citizen of the United States currently lives with over 20,000 laws restricting the sale or transfer of guns in the United States. Get the FACTS. I hate to think what you consider an adequate number of gun restrictions.

    On a related note, you seem to be implying that citizens being able to arm themselves to defend their rights and freedoms against organizations like Scientology is a bad thing. Care to rethink your prejudices?

  156. Punish ciminals. Not victims or objects. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how is one punished if someone else uses his gun ?

    Why should the legitimate gun owner be punished? They didn't pull the trigger. Isn't having their expensive gun stolen from them punishment enough?

    Here's a little hint: Maybe if we actually started punishing criminals (defined as the people who, through their own actions commit crimes) instead of inanimate objects and blameless citizens, we might actually see a decrease in the amount of crime. It's this fuzzy thinking attitude of "society is to blame, so punish society" that allows violent criminals to continue their behavior.

  157. Re:We should! And I used to be a Mormon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had Mormon friends, and I read the chapter that got Deborah Laake excommunicated for writing about her Temple marriage ceremony. (What is it with that doubled "aa" in Mormon names, BTW?) So I know that the LDS church is kinda out there.

    But for sheer goofiness, head over to Operation Clambake and groove on the upper-level super-secret madness that LRon cooked up! It's NUTS!

  158. Disk Defrag... by ph43drus · · Score: 1
    Now, I have yet to use Win2000, but I have had some experience with NT4...

    M$ had said that NT4 didn't need to be defragmented, and people at the hospital where my dad works were instructed not to defrag their NT workstations (NTFS != VFAT and all that).

    Unfortunately, NTFS needs to be defragged, which is a bug in NTFS, and M$ admitted as much by releasing a defrag utility. My dad found his workstation at work horribly defragged, and I do believe this did help with its performance...

    But we users of Linux and Ext2 wouldn't know anything about that kind of problem, now would we?

    Jeff

  159. I was a Scientologist and I bet you haven't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > In fact, the GPL is very compatible with the ideals of Scientology. It may not seem like it is but if you were a Scientologist, you'd know different.

    I was that deluded once, but now I do know different. Scientology, especially the organisation known as the "Church of Scientology", is extremely incompatible with the GPL.

    > You don't know who I am, but you'd probably change your views on Scientology if you did.

    Probably NOT. And you don't know who I am, but you'd definately change your views on Scientology if you did.

    > But it is exactly the sort of bigotry being demonstrated by the German nation - not a nation particularly well known for it's ability to maintain a fair and just society

    All that was over 50 years ago. The only reason you think Germany is bigoted today is because it won't allow Scientology to do as it pleases, and the cult does not like that and teaches its followers accordingly. I think you'd find Germany to be a very fair and just society today if you'd just look around all the propaganda the cult has been feeding you. Germany has suffered enough injustice, unfairness, and bigotry, and does not tolerate it now. That's what they won't tolerate a bigoted, unjust, and unfair organization like Scientology.

    > that leads me to continue my anonymity.

    The death threats and "Fair Game" treatment I got from the cult for leaving it is why I'm staying anonymous (I'm really hoping Slashdot doesn't log anonymous posts in case the cult demands those logs). I also think if you are a good Scientologist, like you say you are, you wouldn't even be reading this thread. The mandatory NetNanny software Scientology makes all its members use before they are allowed onto the internet should be preventing you. Since you're not such a good Scientologist, maybe the real reason you're posting anonymously is because you also don't want the cult to find you out. I think that's a much more likely reason for your posting anonymously than the threat of the Germans getting you. Then again, there is another possibility. Perhaps you are only pretending to be an open source software author to shill for the cult. Exactly what programs have you contributed to or worked on?

    > You probably know more good Scientologists than you think you do,

    I know a few good ex-Scientologists. I try to avoid knowing any current Scientologists, for reasons of my personal safety.

    > and one of these days you'll be surprised to learn that what you think you know about us as a group is only what you've been taught to believe.

    So, do you deny the existence of Xenu? After all, this is what Scientology actually believes. It doesn't speak well for the sanity of the Cult, regardless of its political agenda.

    > you may think you know, but all you know is what you've read. And that's not always the truth.

    I know what I paid good money to learn from Scientology. So, just how much do you know about Scientology? I reached OT3 before I realized what a crock it all is. Have you learned about our friend Xenu yet? Probably not. And truth? All the truth you know is what you've wasted good money to be told by Scientology. I know how slippery that sort of truth can be when only seen from the inside. The outside spectator always sees more of the game.

    Also, you seem to claim that the GPL is not incompatible with Scientology, yet you never demonstrate exactly how it is compatible. Things aren't compatible just because someone says they're not incompatible. Where's the proof?

    I've seen this sort of arguement from Scientology before. Scientology also claims to be compatible with all other religions. Once you get inside, you find it really isn't. And before you tell me this isn't how Scientology really is, you can hear it in Hubbard's own voice . Everything L. Ron ever said is the complete truth, right?

    Finally, if you actually are currently involved in the Cult of Scientology, I urge you to get out! You have no idea what danger you are in. The value you place in open source software and the values of Scientology are completely at odd, and the cult will eventually destroy you for it. The world needs more open source programmers, not more Scientology drones.

  160. Re:Germany banning material? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humm. Anti-German-Goverment to a German means Anti-German-People. Oder habe ich was falsch verstanden?

  161. The Complete Story on our English web site by jkuri · · Score: 1
    I just posted an English translation of our story about Windows 2000, Scientology, the major German Catholic and Lutheran churches and the Government on our web site.

    You can find the article ("Windows 2000 threatened by excommunication") at http://www.heise.de/ct/english/99/25/058/ . The German version of the complete article is at http://www.heise.de/ct/99/25/058".

  162. Not that serious.... by frost22 · · Score: 1

    - the guy is charged with the topict of sects.
    The German Word for that is 'Sekte'. 'Sekt'
    on the other hand is Champagne... so this is
    a Babelfish error.
    - The guy is just speculating. Don't hold
    your breath. The regulation in question is
    aimed at keeping dubious and untrustworthy
    $cientology cover firm from doing government
    related work. I doubt they apply it here.

    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  163. Re:Not Germany is banning!!! It's the Catholic chu by frost22 · · Score: 1

    This is nonsense as well. _The_ catholic
    Church hasn't even a central Authority in
    Germany.

    It is just some guy charged with studying sects,
    who is speculating.

    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  164. One very scary thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading this article, a very scary (those who know Co$ will understand) thought crossed my mind. Is Bill a member? If so, the future might be very dangerous.

  165. More in-depth article by TicTacTux · · Score: 1
    A more in-depth article appeared today in the printed issue as well as in an english translation online here (http://www.heise.de/ct/english/99/25/058/)

    McCarthy strikes back, but this time from a different angle, hehe.

    --
    Use The Source, Luke!
  166. More from an ex-Scientologist by nine9 · · Score: 1
    I think the big problem here is what will happen if Scientology tries to retaliate... Luckily the German Government is quite tough and doesn't makes as many U-turns as ours here in the UK, but they sure will try anything. For example, they tried to close down xenu.net (yeah, I know they didn't succeed, but they still tried)...

    Another thing that is a problem with Scientologists retaliating is that once they've made up their minds, they won't change them... For example, I use Sixdegrees a lot (don't laugh!), and there is a Scientology Discussion Group there. At first I thought they were skeptics, but then I found out they were all bona fide Scienos... OK, so I put my foot in it with a few of my remarks, but eventually they were nice to me... Then this really annoying woman shows up, somehow reads my webpages, and decides I am publishing "bad-PR", and this other guy thinks they should report me to their high hegions...

    It's so annoying!