Slashdot Mirror


Windows 2000 to be banned in Germany?

tjansen writes "The German Site Heise reports in this article that Windows 2000 may be banned in Germany. The reason is the included deframentation software Diskeeper that is written by the Scientology-owned company Executive Software. Many state agencies and companies have policies that they are not allowed to use services from a company that is related to Scientology. " A good number of you will probably need to use The Babelfish.Update: 12/03 11:28 by H :Check out the English translation.

201 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. Seriously by penguinboy · · Score: 1

    Not that I love Windows 2000, but this sounds kind of silly.

    1. Re:Seriously by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1

      I noticed your User Info is an earthlink URL.

      Not many people know this, but
      Earthlink is owned by Scientology.

      I guess Germans aren't supposed to use
      Earthlink (or their acquired mindspring)
      either...

      If you hate Scientology as much as I do,
      you should switch providers and vote with
      your wallet.

      --
      -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
    2. Re:Seriously by MikeBabcock · · Score: 3
      Have you ever actually read something about Scientology? They are quite serious -- (the Scientologists are very strong minded and those opposed to them are equally so).

      See some of these links to understand some of the views ...

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Seriously by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      What the fsck are you talking about? Earthlink is a subsidiary of Sprint, a publicly traded company owned by thousands of people.

      hmmm....If you own 1 share of Sprint and a scientologist owns another share, does that mean you're doing business with the Co$ since you both own shares of Sprint (or any other company for that matter)?

    4. Re:Seriously by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      "Not many people know this, but
      Earthlink is owned by Scientology."


      You are mistaking Earthlink with Mindlink. I believe Mindlink is owned by the "Church" of Scientology

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    5. Re:Seriously by Buaku · · Score: 1
      Scientology is basically considered a criminal organization in Europe, along with new-Nazis and other dangerous cults.

      The scientology cult has earned itself a VERY bad name in certain circles. They didn't get laws like this passed against them for nothing. They worked at it.

  2. Good old Bablefish by kmcardle · · Score: 4

    The connection between the Psycho company and the software giant is sparkling wine assigning of the large churches a thorn in the eye.

    Ah. Good. Things are much clearer now.

    Redmond will quickly work around this one by removing the offending program. Good thing the guys didn't write IE 4.0. The Germans never would have gotten win98. :)

    --

    --
    then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel is just a freight train coming your way
    1. Re:Good old Bablefish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

      Ah, actually, the translation isn't all that bad. The original German used the word `Sektenbeauftragten'. `Sekt', as you may or may not know, is a sparkling white wine. But `Sekte' is used for sect. And a `Sektenbeauftragter' is a person assigned with studying sects, not an assignment of sparkling white wine... ;)

    2. Re:Good old Bablefish by quasimoto · · Score: 1

      Good but you have to admit sometimes there is a little lost in translating. I had a "humor break" when an AEG engineer (no names) would check my 'by the dictionary' translations of his program comments. Some where quite funny. We both had a good laugh. -d

    3. Re:Good old Bablefish by kalandra · · Score: 3

      Actually if you read the German version of the article. At the bottom it clearly states to go here for an english version. Which doesn't contain the white wine BS.

      Which just happens to be at http://www.heise.de/ct/english/99/25/news1/
      for those who care.

  3. I just can't see this happening by Dacta · · Score: 2

    If this really is an issue, then the diskeeper softwear would be fairly easy to remove (if it's not, maybe there should be an Anti-Trust suit about that one!)

    I've used their product on NT4, and I believe that it is almost identical to the one on 2000. It's just a single program, people - it's pretty easy to remove it and make it a free download from the US MS site.

    1. Re:I just can't see this happening by lonely · · Score: 1

      Hmmm I have just had the Diskeeper BootDefrag tool lock up my NT Workstation for 31 hours. This on a 3.1gig partition!

      Maybe I would prefere it they didn't ship this tool with Window 2000, I don't think my manager will appeaciate me loosing 2 more days!

    2. Re:I just can't see this happening by Bud · · Score: 1
      If this really is an issue, then the diskeeper softwear would be fairly easy to remove (if it's not, maybe there should be an Anti-Trust suit about that one!)

      I've used their product on NT4, and I believe that it is almost identical to the one on 2000. It's just a single program, people - it's pretty easy to remove it and make it a free download from the US MS site.

      Is it legal to bundle a "free" download with a monopolised product? I mean, if the Germans are obliged by law not to use DiskKeeper, but have to buy the monopolised product anyway to remain compatible with the rest of the world, do they still have to pay the license fee for DiskKeeper?

      --Bud

  4. In a way, this isn't surprising by jd · · Score: 5
    If Germany makes a law, or passes a ruling, it does at least stick to it, through thick or thin. We've seen that with Compuserve, and other interesting episodes.

    This -could- be interesting, though, as Microsoft is likely to drop support for ALL other versions of Windows, in order to force people to upgrade.

    If Windows 2000 is banned, even if only in Government departments, that will essentially force the de-Microsofting of the German Government. And that could spell some interesting times for *BSD and Linux vendors.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:In a way, this isn't surprising by mcc · · Score: 1

      um. More likely, MS will simply not include the offending program in the German-language version of the W2K bug. That won't be the least bit difficult for them, i'm sure..

    2. Re:In a way, this isn't surprising by Chalst · · Score: 1

      Read the article. It doesn't say that Win2k might be banned in
      Germany, it just says that it might be the case that some state
      governments will not use it.

    3. Re:In a way, this isn't surprising by Stephan+Schulz · · Score: 1

      Just a quick note: The verdict against the Compuserve manager was struck down after a double appeal (both prosecution and defense argued for the case to be dismissed) about two weeks ago.

      --

      Stephan

  5. the Psycho company. by Dast · · Score: 1

    "The connection between the Psycho company and the software giant is sparkling wine assigning of the large churches a thorn in the eye."

    Gotta love that translation. The Psycho (note the capital "P") company. :) Can you feel the hate?

    Now, I'm don't love the church of Scientology, but can someone explain this to me? And what is up with the references to "sparkling wine"?

    --

    This sig is false.

    1. Re:the Psycho company. by jaclu · · Score: 1

      Reharding sparkling wine:
      In German you use the spelling Sekt both for the Wine and for the religious sect

    2. Re:the Psycho company. by CMBurns · · Score: 2

      I think you refer to the german section

      > Die Verbindung zwischen dem Psycho-Konzern und
      > dem Softwareriesen ist Sektenbeauftragten der
      > großen Kirchen ein Dorn im Auge.

      Now the german word for "sparkling wine" is "Sekt", as opposed to german "Sekte" (note the additional "e") which means "sect".

      The mentioned "Sektenbeauftragen" are people who observe said sects. In this case, they are employees of the (catholic/protestant) church.

      So sorry, no alcohol this time. Just religion (which - as we now - is opium for the masses, not a bad deal, huh?).

      CMBurns, german by nature.

    3. Re:the Psycho company. by gotan · · Score: 3

      This is because Scientology is perceived in Germany neither as a church, nor as a sect, but as an organisation threatening the democratic system in germany. They are observed
      by the german "Verfassungsschutz" and aswered this with a public relations campaign, even drawing parallels to the persecution of Jews in the Third Reich.

      --
      "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  6. To summarise... by Rob+the+Roadie · · Score: 2

    W2K may be banned in Germany because a portion of the operating system (sic) was produced by a company owned/partly owned by the Scientologists?

    Thats one in the eye for M$ but I can never see this standing up!

    1. Re:To summarise... by pod · · Score: 1

      The germans have some pretty strict rules against infiltration of their government. Which is exactly what scientology is accused of (and found guilty and banned from germany).

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    2. Re:To summarise... by greenrd · · Score: 1
      That's correct. It's substantiated as well. If you don't believe him/her, read the original article, or even better, this, from the Bavarian government no less:

      http://www.innenministerium.bayern.de/english/scie ntology/

  7. Clue vacuum by Moonwick · · Score: 2

    Take a moment from your drop-of-a-hat Microsoft hatred to actually read the article. The issue at hand is that the Scientology 'church' operates a suspected intelligence organization (WISE) that the German government does not want to risk contaminationg German affairs. It's not about Microsoft hatred. It's about paranoia.

    --
    Only on slashdot can a posting be rated "Score -1, Insightful".
  8. They are serious... by zorgon · · Score: 5

    I'm not too sure about that article (Babelfish implied that the spokesman was the Catholic church's official in charge of sparkling wine, which I think would be a pretty cool job actually, Dominus vobiscum), but the German federal government is really serious about Scientology. If I'm not mistaken the legal sanctions being imposed against Scientology are pretty much the same as those being used to suppress Nazism... it would not surprise me if the German government goes toe-to-toe with Microsoft over this one if it proves correct.
    --

    --

    I am quite civilized, and I should be brought a beer immediately. -- Bruce Sterling

    1. Re:They are serious... by achim · · Score: 2

      First of all the term "Sekte" (religious splinetr group) has as much to do with the term "Sekt" (sparkling wine) as with "Insekt" (insect)...

      More important is the fact that this warning was issued by the catholic church and not by state officials. They tend to exaggerate a little when it comes to CoS. I'm not a fan of CoS, but the big churches in germany tend to be quite hypocritical of "their competitors".

      Though we have laws that fight antidemocratic groups by cutting on their rights, this is always done cautiously and the dangers that come from the goup have to be quite clear. Based on that I would not expect real consequences on the findings here. The danger of CoS infiltrating the world by means of a disk defragmentization program seem a little too far fetched.

      If MS wasn't concerned, nobody had cared at all.

    2. Re:They are serious... by Balazs · · Score: 3

      I'm not mistaken the legal sanctions being imposed against Scientology are pretty much the same as those being used to suppress Nazism


      Finally, a CORRECT usage of a Nazi reference.

      In German-speaking countries, there is legislation against some kinds of groups that are aimed at undermining the democratic system.

      Scientology belongs into this category, as do extreme right and extreme left groups. The only difference is Scientology's ability to buy ads in US newspapers signed by Hollywood "stars" to lie about "a new Holocaust" in Germany.

      --
      Computers. You can't live with them, you can't live without them.
    3. Re:They are serious... by swb · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, once the German Supreme Court has ruled that the Scientology folks are a threat to democracy, that pretty much leaves it up to the constitutional police to enforce their rulings. The constitutional police have nearly unlimited powers to enforce the court's rulings, since they only report to the court.

    4. Re:They are serious... by Jor · · Score: 1

      The danger of CoS infiltrating the world by means of a disk defragmentization program seem a little too far fetched.

      Hmm, just think of all those temporary files from your favorite home-banking software or crypto-suite, that get deleted from harddisk once the application is closed. The data however will remain until physically overwritten by some other program or until a disk-defragmentation program defragments your disk.

      Now, since i cannot look into the Source Code of any Windows2000 component, i am unable to dismiss scenarios where this software deliberatly searches for confidential information and transmits them to a scientology server next time you go online. (Hint: OpenSource cannot get into this situation...)

      Compared to the Scientology Organisation, Microsoft is a free, liberal, open-minded philanthropistic bunch of very nice free, liberal, open-minded persons.

      Note: this only applies in direct comparison to the Scientology Organisation.


      --
      --
      Jor
    5. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      The constitutional police have nearly unlimited powers to enforce the court's rulings, since they only report to the court.

      Nop.

      • There is no such think as a constitutional police in Germany.
      • There is no special political police in Germany.
      • There is the Bundesamt fuer Verfassungsschutz in Germany
      • German's Laender have similar organisations
      • The Verfassungsschutz is part of a democratic system to protect the democratic system itself.
      • The Verfassungsschutz is an pure intelligence organisation, mostly in the business of observing suspicious organisations.
      • Most information is collected from open sources (no, not code :-), like news papers, and publications.
      • The Verfassungsschutz has no police rights, can't arrest people, can't search homes, can't confiscate belongings
      • The Verfassungsschutz mainly reports to the federal and Laender governments
      • The Verfassungschutz cooperates with regular police, corts, prosecutors in case crimes have been found
      • The Verfassungsschutz is controlled by the minister of interior, the parliament, and the privacy protection responsibles. Unlimited power? What were you smoking?
      • It is subject to court orders if misbehaviour has been found.
      • It publishes its main findings in a yearly report (so that observed organisations know they are observed :-))

      Wherever you got your "information" from, please consider to drop that source. Maybe a visit to the library would be in order, too? And stop watching these old war movies is maybe also a good idea.

    6. Re:They are serious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
      The danger of CoS infiltrating the world by means of a disk defragmentization program seem a little too far fetched.

      Actually not. I cannot think of any user program that could access as much information as the disk defragmentization program. In fact, I never thought about this, but the disk defragmenter is the best place to put a trojan (system crashes or is abrutly powered down - and voila - you can modify W2000 kernel, any driver code, any registry entry, any directory access, any executable, any file on the system).

    7. Re:They are serious... by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Moderate this guy up!

    8. Re:They are serious... by billybob+jr · · Score: 1

      Police being kept in check by the courts? sounds like the United States.

    9. Re:They are serious... by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

      It is ironic that a government which bans ideas such as Nazism, or Scientology etc. would do so under the guise of "Protecting the country from totalitarianism." They are only becoming what they are trying to prevent. (IE National Socialism prevented free thought, modern day Germany prevents free thought)

      I have read of similar things about France (regarding Scientology).

      Unfortunately the United States (I believe) is heading in that direction too (under the guise of "protecting the people from 'hate'"). It will not be too long

    10. Re:They are serious... by gatekeeper-eu · · Score: 1

      Some correction is needed here. The Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (as in BfV)has 'Officials' (as in Beampte) not Police (as in Polizi). Their power is not as you describe. Any powers they have are precisely described in the Federal Constitution and Law (die Paragraphen) and in enforcing rulings of the Constitutional Court, they are as in most other western and AngloSaxon countries, 'servants of the court'. In this case only the power of the court as defined in the constitution.

    11. Re:They are serious... by gatekeeper-eu · · Score: 1

      Your typing was quicker than mine! see below. signed: Freundlicher Inzel Affe. (Private Euro Joke)

    12. Re:They are serious... by gatekeeper-eu · · Score: 1

      The (modern) German constitution and legal system is based on the AngloSaxon model. If you still have not got the point - your (the US) system is also based on the AngloSaxon model - you are saying you don't know about your own constitution or its origins? That to be brutally frank does not supprise me.

    13. Re:They are serious... by zorgon · · Score: 2
      First of all the term "Sekte" (religious splinetr group) has as much to do with the term "Sekt" (sparkling wine) as with "Insekt" (insect)...

      DoH, of course! I'd forgotten about Sekt. Left my Langenscheidt somewhere else... Okay, I want the job of being in charge of "Sekt." Not the other one. Thanks... z
      --

      --

      I am quite civilized, and I should be brought a beer immediately. -- Bruce Sterling

  9. It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by Philipp · · Score: 3

    The article quotes an official of the Catholic church, not a representative of the government. The word "Bann" in the headline has to be seen in this context: its a condemnation of the church. So to take this quote and speak of Windows 2000 going to be banned in Germany is quite a leap. So, don't believe everything Babelfish tells you and calm down, folks.

    --

    things. take. time.

    1. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by jw3 · · Score: 4
      You are wrong: they also quote an official from the Innenministerium, the ministry for internal affairs, section devoted to Scientology. And the "bann" in this context meanst that it would not be used by public offices - and this does not have to do anything with the church.

      Regards,

      January

      P.S. No, I'm not using babelfish. I just speak German and live in Germany.

    2. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by EricWright · · Score: 1

      Since you actually speak German, would you mind posting a "real" translation, and not some crazy crap that babelfish spits out? I'm sure a lot of us would appreciate it. Thanks.

      Eric

    3. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by Philipp · · Score: 1

      The quote of the lady from the Hamburg office is not in relation to Windows 2000. And come on, let's get real: You don't seriously believe that anyone in the goverment would stop Microsoft from shipping Windows 2000 to Germany, are you?

      --

      things. take. time.

    4. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by jw3 · · Score: 1
      The quote of the lady from the Hamburg office is not in relation to Windows 2000.

      It is in relation to Executive software.

      You don't seriously believe that anyone in the goverment would stop Microsoft from shipping Windows 2000 to Germany, are you?

      No, although the Germans keep amazing me. But it gives them a bad breath. And for us - a brand new little name to call the Windows users: "booooo, ya scientologists!".

      Regards,

      January

    5. Re:It's a "Bann", not a "Verbot" by jw3 · · Score: 1
      The quote of the lady from the Hamburg office is not in relation to Windows 2000.

      It is in relation to Executive software.

      You don't seriously believe that anyone in the goverment would stop Microsoft from shipping Windows 2000 to Germany, are you?

      No, although the Germans keep amazing me. But it gives Microsoft a bad breath. And for us - a brand new little name to call the Windows users: "booooo, ya scientologists!".

      Regards,

      January

  10. MS will support NT & 98 for four years by Dacta · · Score: 3
    after they stop shipping. It is in their standard support agreement.

    Why does it always have to be me defending MS from all the FUD on /.

    I don't like MS, and it kills my Karma. :-(

    Oh well.. if someone said something wrong about Linux, I'd do the same thing.

    1. Re:MS will support NT & 98 for four years by mistered · · Score: 2

      It depends on what you mean by support, though. Of course if you call Microsoft "support" and are willing to pay $195 (here in ca) per incident, they'll "support" you.

      Don't try to tell me that they'll "support" 98 and NT by releasing all of their applications for the next four years in 98/NT versions as well.

      --
      Enjoy your job, make lots of money, work within the law. Choose any two.
  11. WTO will jump on them... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    I suspect the WTO could make a case for this being back-door protectionism, especially given that Germany has a large native OS distributor. I'm not sure who I find more scary, the WTO or the Co$.

    Of course, I'm sure there are some Linux contributors who are scientologists, but I guess the regulation concerns companies.

    BTW, what does Win2000 need a defragmentor for? I thought disk fragmentation was cracked long before journalling and b-trees hit the agenda.

    1. Re:WTO will jump on them... by nine9 · · Score: 1
      I'm definitely more afraid of the Church of Scientology... (see my Website

      ) nine9

  12. Law by dnnrly · · Score: 1

    Doesn't German law try to actively prevent 'cults' from spreading. I have a feeling that this is a side effect of thier anti nazism laws.

  13. I laughed. I cried. by EricWright · · Score: 1
    Oh, that was extremely funny. But, don't we typically use the Psycho company and "the software giant" interchangably?

    Another of my favorites is...Harald bear, catholic representative for sparkling wines and world looking questions. I'm glad someone represents these noteworthy causes! You think Mr. Bear can give us some good tips on champagne futures? I missed out on the RH IPO!

    Eric

  14. Re:FIRST POST by albalbo · · Score: 1

    You know, with the Universe and karma and all being how it is, you're in for one hell of an eternity ;))

    Alex.

    --
    "Elmo knows where you live!" - The Simpsons
  15. Not Germany is banning!!! It's the Catholic churc! by Mika+Uka · · Score: 2

    Your answers seem to imply that Windows 2000 will probably banned by Germany. But that is not the case, it's just a report of a German computer magazine (Heise) that the Catholic church is about to ban Windows 2000 for that.

    Actually I personally ban Windows at all - from my personal computers. Although I still have to use that OS at work. But that's another story ;-)

    Bright Blessings
    Mika

  16. too good to be true? by cabalamat · · Score: 1

    Sounds too good to be true. Unfortunately.

    OTOH, Germany is funding open source software (GPG).

  17. Re:FIRST POST by Mike+Monett · · Score: 1

    Agree. I understand the desire to maintain freedom of speech and avoid the appearance of censorship, but this crap is getting out of hand. It is wasting everyone's time and making ./ look foolish.

    Why not specify "Fair Use" conditions that automatically assign a special category to "first post" and the use of profanity. And enforce it.

    If anyone want to read this junk, they can change their filter limits. The rest of us shouldn't have to put up with it.

  18. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by Wastl · · Score: 1

    What about a mechanism to allow only a limited
    number of Anonymous posts from a certain IP Address within a Topic? (Similar to the Poll system) Only registered users may post as they wish.

    Sebastian

  19. Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 4

    The Co$ has a history of attempting to disrupt online discussions about them, if they are likely to be critical of the "Church". The Usenet newsgroup alt.religion.scientology is legendary for this.

    So I wonder if this loon with the "Natalie Portman" posts has been hatted to disrupt Slashdot?

    1. Re:Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by EricWright · · Score: 1
      No, probably just some pimply faced teenaged, high school dropout with nothing better to do, and pissed off that Segfault doesn't put up with this sort of crap anymore.

      Eric

    2. Re:Is the "Natalie Portman" AC from the Co$? by HR · · Score: 1

      Strictly speaking, it's not futile to have assholes and their material removed from a forum, and, with any luck, from their ISPs.

      The worst offenders are always a small minority of users. Vandals are usually punk kids with a difficult home life or psychologically aberrant adults, neither of which exist in large enough quantities to matter. If you can keep shutting them down from their ISPs, only the truly obsessed wackos will continue to find new ISPs to abuse. The more noise you can get from these freaks, the easier it is to get a lock on the individual doing it. Then targets of abuse have more options to pursue.

  20. Re:Enough!!! by segmond · · Score: 1

    No more Anonymous cowards will not fix this, this guy could be doing this via an automated script, he can easily register an account with any free website, then with his script continue the stupid act. The best thing is simply to trace him and have him spanked, tho he might enjoy that.

    --
    ------ Curiosity killed the cat. {satisfaction brought it back | it didn't die ignorant | lack of it is killing mankind
  21. No... by Megaweapon · · Score: 3

    The whole Natalie Portman thing got moved to Slashdot because Segfault.org stopped allowing people to post messages. I was a frequent Segfault reader, and Natalie Portman was a very common topic over there. The Natalie Portman/Statue/Mae Ling whatever/etc... people just moved over here to Slashdot.

    --
    I'm sure "SlashdotMedia" will improve on all the wonders that Dice Holdings blessed us all with
  22. Good new GPLtrans by Krollekop · · Score: 3


    Maybe it's time to advertise the use of the GPLtrans engine instead of Babelfish ...

    Unfortunately, their German translation unit is under maintainance for a few days. Too many words [...] and MySQL isn't responding
    correctly
    , the web site says.

    I for one hope that GPLtrans will be mentioned next time a non-English article is referenced on Slashdot.

    Kk.

  23. Diskeeper (OT) by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    Don't use version 5... I had a similar problem.

    You know you're in trouble when they threw out the fairly useful interface in version 4 in favor of hooking into the Microsoft Management Console.
    The program also seems to run in real-mode priority regardless of what you tell it. My machine took 20 minutes to repaint the screen so I could shut the d*mn thing down.

    User Interface Hell... and it locks up your computer. I never had trouble with DK until version 5 and have just switched back to 4, no useful functionality lost either.



    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:Diskeeper (OT) by EvlG · · Score: 2

      I agree. The MMC sucks big time. It's probably one of the most disappointing things about Win2k. The old tools like WinDisk and such are now tied into that load of bloat, making the tool run slower for no good reason. And the startup time is VERY annoying as well.

      More Microsoft bloat with no useful gain.

    2. Re:Diskeeper (OT) by Wah · · Score: 1

      please, keep things in perspective..

      More Microsoft bloat with no useful gain.

      It's called "innovation" people, c'mon get with the program....

      --
      +&x
    3. Re:Diskeeper (OT) by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair to Microsoft MMC was an attempt to gather up all system management tools into one place.

      Of course, what they ended up with is a sprawling mazelike mess that is far more difficult to use than the disparate tools it replaces. I went back from IIS 4 to IIS 2 because it was took me about 20 minutes of wandering aimlessly just to configure basic ftp server functionality. And since everything is so random, you end up having to wander through aimlessly every time you use because nothing is intuitive. It's all just an endless maze of twisty little options all the same.

      I don't know what the User Interface experts have been doing for the last ten years, because in my opinion, GUI's are steadily and consistently getting worse.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  24. Hrm, an interesting alliance. by Bad+Mojo · · Score: 1

    We know Microsoft is rather un-ethical as far as companies go. And Scientology is the ultimate Evil. Is there any doubt that the two are linked? It won't suprise me to see more `alliances' in the future between these two tyrants of vile injustice.


    Bad Mojo

    --
    Bad Mojo
    "If you can't win by reason, go for volume." -- Calvin
    1. Re:Hrm, an interesting alliance. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised to find Bill Gates evolved from a clam...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  25. Paranoia by Lazy+Jones · · Score: 2
    The funny thing about this is, that the german army uses Lotus Notes internally with its weak encryption routines (the NSA has part of the key).

    The Scientology issue may sound odd, but as the government has found that they have been trying to infiltrate the state agencies to gain power and thus they have been considered a risk to the country's security, the decision not to use Windows 2000 would just be a side-effect of the politics of avoiding such threats.

    --
    "I love my job, but I hate talking to people like you" (Freddie Mercury)
  26. According to c't 25 the story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    as follows: Windows 2000 contains Diskeeper, a disk defragmenter. Diskeeper was created by Executive Software. Executive Software's CEO is Craig Jensen, a fairly high-ranking Scientologist (OT VIII and stuff). Scientology has been under investigation as being a danger to Germany under the `Verfassungsschutz'-laws. Partly due to those investigations many companies and governmental agencies in Germany are asking their members, employees and commercial partners to sign documents in which they declare not to have anything to do whatsoever with the teachings and religion of L. Ron Hubbard and Scientology. Now, Microsoft cannot truthfully sign these contracts anymore, and therefore many companies will at least think twice before doing business with Microsoft. Microsoft's official reaction is that you can simply remove the offending Diskeeper. This, however, seems to be quite somewhat easier said than done.

  27. Help, we're under attack by a herd of clams! by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1
    Hey, this sure looks like an organized attack from the scientologist (a.k.a. clams).

    Years ago, they tried the same kind of shenanigans against the alt.religion.scientology board, which is a forum for scientology criticists. First they tried to shut down discussions by forge-cancelling any critical article, and when that didn't work any longer, they tried swamping the board with meaningless rubbish.

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  28. Ich bin ein Deutschlander by nhowie · · Score: 2

    Right I'm moving to Germany ;)

    Does this mean that GNU/Linux will be banned in the US of A, since Richard Stallman is obviously a communist... ;-)

    On a serious note, though, this amounts to state censorship, and should not be tolerated - I'm surprised that this doesn't contravene some EU directive. Perhaps if the defragger had some pop-up instructing the user to join the Church of Scientology, then it might be justifiable. Also, do the German government intend to ban all John Travolta (or any other star related to the Scientologist) films?

    If you want to ban W2K, I can think of far better reasons.

    1. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by EJB · · Score: 1

      I think the Germans consider scientology a criminal organization. I don't think banning products from criminal organizations is something people would object to.
      Wether scientology is should be labeled as a criminal organization is the whole point, but it is another discussion.

    2. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by Rick+Razzano · · Score: 1

      Germany is not the U.S.; state censorship is legal in Germany. Last time I checked, they have their own constitution.

    3. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by wossName · · Score: 2

      Well, once you are in Germany you hopefully learn to speak (or at least read) the language, since you apparently don't understand what the c't newsitem was about.
      This has nothing to do with state-censorship, because the government only forbids its own agencies to do business with Scientology-related companies, and even that only in Hamburg and Bavaria AFAIK. And it makes perfect sense, as we have seen with the latest User ID-transmitting follies of programs less relevant to system security. This defragger will probably not send your password files to the Internet, but it should at least be checked, especially when it was developed by a Scientology-controlled company and especially when you're a government agency.
      I agree with my government on few things, but on this issue I'm pleasantly surprised how well they "get it" about Scientology and the US government doesn't.

      As for John Travolta/the Cruises, I'd guess that they probably don't even know what Scientology is _really_ about. They're obviously kept around for image reasons ("Hey, they're rich and famous, so how can Scientology be a bad thing ?"), get the VIP treatment and don't have to submit to any interrogation or rundown tortures. (At least I haven't heard otherwise)
      The only reason one might consider banning their films for is bad acting, but that's just IMHO. ;)

      And to the moderators: the above post got upped ? Please, that was mostly polemic !

      --
      Someone is wrong on the Internet!
    4. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by Feral+Wylde+I · · Score: 1

      You must have used Babelfish for the title,
      it is supposed to be Ich bin ein Deutscher!
      Aber Ich bin ein Franke! Danke!

      State censorship in Germany still allows you to
      buy pornography, and legally drink at an age that
      would toss you in jail here. Prostitution is also
      legal. The EU doesnt mess with the internal
      domestic policies of their member nations.
      I was surprised when I returned to the USA that I
      had to wait till I was 18 to drink beer and how
      intrusive our religious groups are here.

    5. Re:Ich bin ein Deutschlander by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

      Well, it goes like this:

      American freedom is partly a farce. While on one hand our Federal Constitution allowing practically anything (it is very vague), we also have our federal government violating it whenever they wish. The United States has absolutely never allowed complete personal freedom.
      For example, we have to right to own firearms, although we can not own certain types of firearms. We can use drugs (coffee, tobacco, alcohol), but not others (pot, cocaine, LSD) (I believe it depends on who is giving the most money :))

      We still have freedom of speech (for the most part), and I can, for example, put up a Nazi website claiming that Hitler helped the German economy, and was an all around nice guy, and the Government cannot take it down (my ISP can, however).

      I am, for the most part a libertarian, and I believe in more social freedom (with regard to drugs etc).

  29. Re:POST NUMBER NOTIFICATION. by LinuxGeek · · Score: 1

    You have convinced me that you must be a Scientoligist trying to completely disrupt any discussion here.

    You have also convinced me that Scientologists and M$ actually deserve each other.

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
  30. Operating systems... by Zerah · · Score: 1

    Hmm...
    I guess you can see this is another bad
    thing that happens when you start bundling
    too much stuff together with OS... if Microsoft
    had sticked to only making OSen and not bundling
    everything into it, they would not have run
    into all this hassle...
    Internet Explorer, Stacker, this defragging
    software... the list goes on.
    Seems like the old saying of sticking
    to your corebusiness still holds some truth....?



  31. New "tech" banned due to Scientology? by Deosyne · · Score: 2

    Why are products by Scientologists banned by German companies? Does Scientology have ties with neo-Nazi groups or something? Babelfish rather garbled that article, so I coundn't discern the reasoning of that if it was in the article, and I can't find any info about that elsewhere. Anyone know?

    Deosyne

    1. Re:New "tech" banned due to Scientology? by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      Mostly because Co$ is NOT a religion. It is a conspiracy motivated ripp-off

      American Law states that just about everyone who thinks his mind is fed by a "higher force" and creates a new religion, has the right to call their delusion so; "religion"

      Well, Science Fiction writer Ballard though this would be a really cool way of accomplishing World Domination (literally) So he wrote an extra few books about "Thetans" and "OT levels" and other "secret" stuf. You gotta read some of that. It is some of ballards best work .Of course that is illegal, cuz copyrighted. Which doesn't prevent anti Co$ activists to publish it anyway of course.

      Still, cus of the silly laws, silly Americans Like Cruise and Travolta this organization is quite big, influencial and well, dangerous.
      They are known for discreibility tactics for attacking enemies, in fact some of the stuff they publish (secretely, intern) is about how to "break" enemies and perform other illegal methods.

      The german government (as a lot of others have done less publically) recognized the danger of such an organisation, who uses such brutal and illegal methods, hidden in a "religous" org., and has rightfully outlawed them.

      Greetz Richard

  32. Cults... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Good idea, although I happen to like Windows 2000. If you actually USE it it's damn good (and looks cool, esp with Transperizer...).

    This is a legacy I think from the Anti-Nazi laws everybody made Germany pass after WWII. But if it allows somebody to halt the march of such an enigmatic (and law bashing...) cult then they can't be that bad!

    While we're on, could we ban Mormon's as well?

  33. CAN SOMEBODY STOP THESE MORONS? by kristallin · · Score: 1

    This is post number 643.972571563*2984

    Shut the heck up, people, and comment on what's going on, or at least post nude pics of NP here *grins*
    Seriously, if you want to babble on like that, get a life, and get a list, they're free at Onelist, you know... that way you're not getting on any /. reader's nerves with posting senseless $h*t!
    Do good for once!

    --
    you never know - reality may leave beta-test today!
    1. Re:CAN SOMEBODY STOP THESE MORONS? by CrAlt · · Score: 1

      Ya but then you would at least know what ISP the guy was on, and maybe RobM could make a preferences option to block that ISP for you.

      --
      I have to return some videotapes...
  34. Adding to Germany's paranoia by Tradewars+Addict · · Score: 1
    What happens if members of the Scientology group have contributed to Linux, etc.?

    ??????

    I mean it could happen, couldn't it?

  35. Both Good and Bad .. by arcade · · Score: 2

    When reading this, two things occured to me.

    First, i don't like the idea of banning neither religions, free speech or programs made by people / companies that has a certain belief. I have this nagging feeling when I hear about germans banning nazism. Of course, nazism is a Bad Thing(tm), but on the other hand.. it should be *legal* to have certain kind of opinions, and it should be legal to meet other people with the same opinions.

    The same thing applies to Scientology. Its a Bad Thing(tm), but on the other hand, I think its bad banning them, and I think its absurd to ban Windows 2000 just because a tiny little program inside it, is made by a company funded by clams. (Clams, slang for "scientologists").


    But, when we think about OUR goals, that is, killing of microsoft, scientology, nazism, and so forth .. I think the germans make good use of their laws. And, I guess it really could help SuSE, if windows2000 cannot be sold in Germany. I vision the entire German population using Linux and so forth. Oh, sweet dreams. :-)


    But, on the whole, I really think it stinks that they ban win2000, just because of some clams. Even though I don't like clams.. except for dinner.. I think :-)

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    1. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by ge · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's Scientology's beliefs that got the German federal and state governements all upset, it's their actions.

    2. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Reinoud · · Score: 1

      >First, i don't like the idea of banning neither religions, free speech or programs made by people / companies that has a certain belief
      in general, you are right, but Scientology is a "relogion" that states that it's beliefs are more important than the law. For this reason, the German government has decided that it is not possible to do government work and be a member of the "church" at the same time.

      Whether Scientology is a church at all is a different discussion. Im some countries they have been declared a criminal organisation in court verdicts.

      --
      -- Nothing is as subjective as reality --
    3. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Camelot · · Score: 1

      As the Germans see it, Scientologists are criminals, not preachers. And I whole-heartedly agree with them.

    4. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Myddrin · · Score: 2

      in general, you are right, but Scientology is a "relogion" that states that it's beliefs are more important than the law.

      If you check, most religions say this in one way or another. The law is of man, the Law comes from a higher power. (Or in the case of Buddhism is just how the universe works.)

      The german gov't finds the Orginization (the earthly part of the religion) to have done some very bad, bad things. I am already a little quesy with the idea, but I would have a major problem if they where saying that the beliefs of the religion should be banned.

      As far as I know example, the german gov, doesn't have any problem with the squirels (the people who leave $cinetology, but keep practicing the "tech").

      Just my 2 cents worth....
      RobK (Buddhist)

      --
      Myddrin
    5. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by aprentic · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. I always wondered why the list of crimes in the Church of Scientology included "Continued association with squirels." Do you have any idea why they picked the word "squirrls" for this?

    6. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Myddrin · · Score: 3

      I'm very fuzzy, but I seem to remember that LRH coined the phrase, referring to how cute and fuzzy squirels will steal nuts from people. Something like that. I talked to a few back when I hung out on alt.religion.scientology. They didn't seem like criminals to me, actually _most_ of them were very nice, just a little wierd. (There was one guy, Homer something that kept drawing me into flame wars.... :) )

      A bunch of them have banned together and formed a free society (the name of which I can't remember), that persues LRH's ideas w/o the oppressive leadership of the {ahem} Church. (They even liken them selves to the heretics during the Spanish Inquisition.

      I think there might be more info on xemu.net , but I can't be sure.

      RobK

      --
      Myddrin
    7. Re:Both Good and Bad .. by Myddrin · · Score: 2

      It's their actions that wory people. Their ignorance of human rights, their clear statement to destroy every government and become the supreme rulers of the world, their infiltration and espionage activities, and the more disgusting things.
      These people don't need to be banned. Criminals belong into prisons.


      Agreed, Criminals belong in prison. However, I was trying to point out that most people's beef is with the orginization, and that if you meet a $cientologist they are not ness. a criminal. Nor IMNSHO should believing in $cientology ness. be a crime... that's a little 1984ish

      It goes like this in some people's minds
      Some $cinetologist are Criminals
      Tom is a $cientologist
      ___________________________
      Tom is a criminal.

      This is not true as any student of elementary logic will tell you.

      --
      Myddrin
  36. Can Slashdot stand up to the clams? by cruise · · Score: 2

    Wow, there is surley enough derogatory comments about the clams in here to send them off into a legal frenzy. Can Slashdot stand up to the Scientologist Effect? Will they remove comments once the legal eagles come swarming in? Will they withstand the personal threats to their home and family!? Will they even notice the private dick who has been watching their every move since the article was published?

    All this and more....

  37. Tranlation by SL2C · · Score: 3

    Windows 2000 in danger of being banned

    A component of Windows 2000 was made by a scientology company. The defragmentation program "Diskeeper" is scheduled to be shipped in February as a standard part of the NT successor.
    It is being developed by the firm "Executive Software" of the confessing [?] scientologist Craig Jensen, as has been reported in c't issue 25/99. The connection between the psycho trust and the software giant is a thorn in the side of the large churches.

    "This will not be interesting to the Catholic Church alone, but also to the states, the Verfassungsschutz [one branch of the secret service] as well as the German industry", Harald Baer, catholic commissary for sects and wold outlook issues [Weltanschauung issues], commented to the German press agency (dpa). According to Ursula Caberta, leader of the Scientology working group of the Hamburg interior authority, Executive Software is one of the leading businesses in the Scientology organization WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises). [She says] WISE is "the decisive branch of Scientology in order to infiltrate and spy on the economy". In the states of Bavaria and Hamburg, there have been resolutions according to which authorities, in particular in the area of information technology, are not allowed to buy services from scientology businesses. (em)
    (cp/c't)

    1. Re:Tranlation by Kartoffel · · Score: 1
      I smell clams.

      Rob, Hemos, Neal: how about logging the ip's of AC posters? Just automatically encrypt em and file them away somewhere.

      I realize that abusiveness is a subjective thing. It would be cool if the /. administrators could pull up a log somewhere and see that, for example, 123.45.67.89 has posted a hundred AC comments about Natalie Portman in one discussion.

      Keep the logs secure and private, but if it looks like someone is being *seriously abusive*, you could subject that person's access rights up to moderation? Create an anonymized track record of _all_the_posts_ from the alleged abuser and allow moderators to decide if it's abusive.

      If the moderators give it a thumbs-down, ban the ip.

      Ack! end of rant. Everyone be sure to watch the Mars landing coming up in a few hours. I can't wait! ^_^

    2. Re:Tranlation by lacinyc · · Score: 1

      Nice view on Free Speech. :/

      ALL speech should be free, sadly even that of idiots.

      It's hard to stomach sometimes, but for real freedom you have to let whoever say whatever they want whenever. any limits are just that, limits.

      If you are limited you are not free.

      --

      --
      -- "My dad used to play sports with me... I don't like sports" -Tim
  38. Re:Seriously -- No doubt! by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

    Lots of people got beef with scientology. And vice versa as well...

    Check out this link: http://www.xs4all.nl/~kspaink/

    This page belongs to a good friend of mine, and she's been crusading against scientology for quite a while now. Not to mention that Scientology is trying to shut this down as well.

  39. bans distro. by Phill+Hugo · · Score: 2

    Choas in the street! has BANNED distribution. Slashdot erupts with rasied voises calling for immediate revokation of the ruling and flames the entire nation.

    said "this is a direct attack on the freedom of the people to choose what they wish, we should fight this at all costs".

    When contains GNU/Linux, this would be the story. The Spokeman would no doubt be Eric, Bruce or Richard and we'd all be telling each other to hold back the mindless mail bombings to whoever's government is offending.

    But this times its Microsoft, so it doesn't matter. Good on !

    Surely there is something wrong here. Yes, I know its MS. Yes, I know its scientology but this a stupid reason to suggest not using something, let alone banning it.

    We'd not let anyone suggest not using GNU/Linux just because Linus and the TLA crew[*] converted to some minority, much less becuase line 5329 of Perl was bug fixed by a member.

    Phill

    * ESR, RMS, ETC.

    1. Re: bans distro. by ge · · Score: 1
      Oh, please. What we've got here is someone from the Catholic church in Germany making a statement. I don't think W2000 has been banned yet. Some German states have rules that don't allow the govt. to fund anything that furthers Scienotoly's cause. It's questionable whether these rules will be stretched this far.

      When a Scientologist contributes to Linux by providing GPL'ed software s/he gives up control over it. There's a difference there.

  40. About using the right means to fight wrong by Camelot · · Score: 1
    I hate doing this, but - again - I find that I have to defend Microsoft. I would like nothing better than see Microsoft locked up in chains and the key thrown away. But, it has to be for the right reasons.

    ESR has it right, even though I don't totally with him - Microsoft should be taken down by natural forces (ie. market). Let's ignore the fact (ie. MHO) that it wouldn't be possible without the intervention of the DOJ for now, since it's not really relevant.

    Windows 2000 banned in Germany ? Fine with me. Doing it because of scientology is simply clouding the issue - the only good reason to do it would be because Microsoft and its products are bad for your health. Any other reason will allow Microsoft to be victimized and gain symphaty.

    Like I said, I don't like to be on the same side with Microsoft, but for the sake of doing the right thing, I'll do it.

  41. Translation by gotan · · Score: 1

    Windows 2000 threatened to be banned

    A component of Windows 2000 comes from a scientology-company. The defragmentation program "Diskeeper" is intended to be marketed as an integral part of the NT-successor. It was developed by Executive Software, a company of the confessing Scientologist Craig Jensen. The connection from the Pseudo-company [Scientology] to Microsoft bothers representatives of the big Churches concerned with sects.

    "Apart from the catholic Church also all German states, the office responsible for defending the constitution, and the german industy, will take an interest in this." comments Harald Baer, catholic representative for sects [...]. According to Ursula Caberta, head of the "workgroup scientology" of Hamburgs interior office, Executive Software belongs to the leading businesses of the WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises) Scientology organisation: "WISE is the main branch of Scientology for undermining and spying out the economy." In the german states Bayern and Hamburg resulitions exist, saying that official authorities may not buy services from Scientology-companies, especially in the Information Technology sector.

    --
    "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
  42. A quick and dirty translation by Ignatius · · Score: 2

    Windows 2000 threatened by Bann

    A component of Windows 2000 comes from a Scientology company. The defragmentation software "Diskeeper" is to be shipped in February as a fixed component of the NT successor. It is developed by the company "Executive software" of the admitting Scientology member Craig Jensen, as c't reported in the issue 25/99. The connection between the psycho company and the software giant is a thorn in the eye of large church sect-observers.

    "That will not only interest the catholic church, but also all provices, the Verfassungsschutz [German equivalent to the FBI], and the German industry" comments Harald Baer, catholic official for sects and Weltanschauung-questions, to the german press agency dpa. Accoring to Ursula Caberta, head of the Scientology working-group of the Hamburg office for internal affairs, "Executive Software" is among the leading companies of the Scientology-organisation WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises).
    WISE is the "crucial lever of Scientology to infiltrate and spy the economy". The states of Bavaria and Hamburg have existing resolutions which forbid offices the aquisition of services form Scientology-companies, esp. in the field of information technology.

  43. They won't release security fixes by divec · · Score: 2

    > MS will support NT & 98 for four years
    > after they stop shipping. It is in their
    > standard support agreement.

    Well since two years ago, it has not been possible to get a copy of Win 3.1 which has had all known security holes patched, and Win 3.1 stopped shipping only two years before that. I think "not fixing root exploits" is not the same as "supporting".

    Didn't MS claim to have lost some of the Win 3.x source code last year? That was less than four years after they stopped shipping it. How they're supposed to "support" a product to which they don't even have the source code, I don't know.

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

    1. Re:They won't release security fixes by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      "Root exploits"? You must be talking about NT 3.1, which stopped shipping in 1994 or so. Fixes for plain 'ol DOS/Win3.1 continued for a bit into 95-96 with networking fixes and a version of IE4.

      And yes, AFAIK "supported" at Microsoft means that if you call on the phone someone will have some idea what you are talking about. It doesn't necessary mean that there will be many or any bug fixes.

      However, I'm guessing that Windows 2000 will be a special case for MS support, because ActiveDirectory is going to scare people away from upgrading for a long time. Look at Novell -- they came out with a new version of NetWare 3 just this year for the we're-still-scared-of-NDS crowd-even-after-you've-browbeat-us-to-upgrade-for -five-years crowd.
      --

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  44. Translation of German news text by harmonica · · Score: 5

    Everything in [] are my comments to explain things. Translating this shows me how much a good translator is worth! ;-)
    --
    Windows 2000 threatened by ban

    One component of the Windows 2000 software is coming from a Scientology enterprise. The defragmentation program "Diskeeper" is going to be released in February as integral part of the
    NT successor. It was developed by Executive Software, an enterprise belonging to the confessing scientologist Craig Jensen, as C't magazine reports in issue 25/99. The connection
    between Scientology and the software giant is not liked by the Sektenbeauftragter (person responsible to review the activities of sects) of the large churches.

    "This is going to interest not only the Catholic church but also the Bundesländer (states ), the Verfassungsschutz (government institution that supervises activities that are against the German constitution) and the German industry", comments
    Harald Baer, Catholic representative for sects and philosophy of life [that's a straight translation] in response to DPA [a news agency].

    According to Ursula Caberta, who leads the study group Scientology of Hamburg's Innenbehoerde [an institution of the City of Hamburg], Executive Software belongs to the leading enterprises of the Scientology organization WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises). WISE, according to Caberta, "is the crucial arm of Scientology to infiltrate and spy on trade and industry". In Bayern and Hamburg [German states, Hamburg is a city state] there are laws that forbid public institutions, especially on the information technology sector, to buy services from Scientology enterprises.

    1. Re:Translation of German news text by harmonica · · Score: 1

      Sorry to reply to my own post, but re-reading this: Translating this shows me how much a good translator is worth! is a bit contradictory - I meant that a professional translator (which I am not) could have done a much better job... I've simply copied and explained many German words for which I didn't find a translation.

  45. CO$ Attack on /. not working by trance9 · · Score: 3

    Hah. I didn't even notice all the Natalie Portman spam because I always read with at least a minimal level of filtering based on score.

    That must drive the CO$ weenies crazy. I remember when they successfully ruined alt.religion.scientology by spamming the group with so many messages that any real discussion was lost.

    Scientology is an evil organization that is willing to go to any lengths to further its greedy interests. I'm not talking about protesting, or organizing church dinners here--death threats against "enemy" newspaper reporters, collecting damaging information about their own members for use as blackmail in the event that they testify against the cult, attempting to shut down, harass, and bankrupt critics... the list goes on.

    I don't blame the German govt. for not wanting to run any software written by Scientology. Given their thug like behavior in every other area, why would you trust their code? They probably did build some backdoors into it.

  46. [Country] bans [Vendor's] [OS] distro. by Phill+Hugo · · Score: 1

    Choas in the street! [Country] has BANNED [Vendor's] [OS] distribution. Slashdot erupts with rasied voises calling for immediate revokation of the ruling and flames the entire nation.

    [Spokesman] said "this is a direct attack on the freedom of the people to choose what they wish, we should fight this at all costs".

    When [OS] contains GNU/Linux, this would be the story. The Spokeman would no doubt be Eric, Bruce or Richard and we'd all be telling each other to hold back the mindless mail bombings to whoever's government is offending.

    But this times its Microsoft, so it doesn't matter. Good on [Country]!

    Surely there is something wrong here. Yes, I know its MS. Yes, I know its scientology but this a stupid reason to suggest not using something, let alone banning it.

    We'd not let anyone suggest not using GNU/Linux just because Linus and the TLA crew[*] converted to some minority, much less becuase line 5329 of Perl was bug fixed by a [cult minority of the week] member.

    Phill

    * ESR, RMS, ETC.

    1. Re:[Country] bans [Vendor's] [OS] distro. by Znork · · Score: 1

      Ah, but what if one of the TLA crew added a couple of lines of code to let them read anything on your disk and/or erase any documents they dont want around? With linux we have the source to discover that, but with Windows we dont.

      So, tell me, do you find it reassuring that a cult that is interested in control and power through a company dedicated to economic espionage and disruption may have coded backdoors into government computers so they can do whatever they want to your personal information? I can certainly understand the german government. Scientology wouldnt be above a little creative messing around with government data. After all, they arent above doing it manually by having sect members doing it.

  47. Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Even if some WTO officials don't want to admit it, but democratic principles, health, culture etc. still matter.

    In Germany (and Austria AFAIK) there are tough, constitutional rules intended to defend democracy and a lawful state. This means groups that aim t undermne the democratic order, like right-wing extremists or extreme communists are banned, and so are references to Nazism etc.
    Co$ is suspected to be a group that intends to destroy the democratic order as defined by the constitution, as these intentions are expressed in their writings.

    Those constitutional principles, based on General Human Rights, are definitely more important than WTO regulations.

    1. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      *references*?

      There's a General Human Right to prevent everybody from possibly offending you with a *reference*?

      C'mon. Even "Wolfenstein 3D" (or was it the Wolf3D homage in _Doom_ ?) got banned, and in Wolf3D the game involved _killing_ Nazis, not helping them...

      Does that strike you as free and democratic?

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:Defending the Democracy Does Matter by coyote-san · · Score: 1

      ... there was an outcry of moral superiority from west of the Atlantic....

      Complete that thought. One of the most notable such outcries, a signed ad in major newspapers, was subsequently denounced by some of the signers. They claimed that they were deliberately misled about the situation and did *not* agree with the CoS after learning the full story. (Unfortunately, since I saw this on a news broadcast I can't recall the name of the people interviewed.)

      Many of the other signers were obviously no different than many of the KKK members of the 1920's-era USA. (Some states had *huge* KKK membership roles - including many minorities - because a few prominent business owners announced that they would only do business with other businesses owned by members of the KKK. As long as they keep their gloves on, and hoods off, they had a lot of "support," but it all evaporated the instant someone called them on their true colors. No pun intended) If you're a movie producer and the agents for Tom Cruise and John Travolta call you and, ahem, suggest that you add your name to what seems to be an innoculous ad, you do so. The alternative is to find the stars are oddly unavailable for your next project.

      Many Americans *do* have mixed feelings about the German actions vis-a-vis the CoS, but we also rank most of the published outcry as being nothing more than a feeble attempt at Hollywood-ized politics.
      Besides, we need our guns in case the CoS actually does somehow get control of a state. :-)

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  48. SET YOUR THRESHOLD LEVEL TO 1 by laetus · · Score: 1

    In your /. preferences, set your threshold level to 1. Then when losers like the original poster get moderated to zero (usually pretty quickly), you'll never even see their inane babbling.

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
    1. Re:SET YOUR THRESHOLD LEVEL TO 1 by Stonehand · · Score: 2

      The one factor that made me hesitate 'bout that is that this will screen out *all* non-moderated AC posts -- which often seem to be ignored by moderators in favor of sometimes less worthy non-anonymous posts, despite the fact that some *do* deserve to be upped...

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:SET YOUR THRESHOLD LEVEL TO 1 by Mike+Monett · · Score: 1

      Clearly, the real problem is the limited range of numbers used to moderate a post. This can be fixed.

      I propose increasing the range from the current level to plus and minus infinity.

      I realize this will create problems when post approaches either limit - it will take the entire computing capacity of the universe to express the number.

      But hey - computers are getting faster every year.

      Also, the actual limits at infinity should be reserved for direct correspondence from dieties and representatives of higher powers.

      These people know who they are, and will have no problem adjusting their level no matter what we do.

    3. Re:SET YOUR THRESHOLD LEVEL TO 1 by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Don't sweat it. The number of worthwhile AC posts that don't get moderated up are small enough to miss, given the large amount of signal (and noise) on /.

      Try it for two days and see if you'll ever go back to threshold=0.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    4. Re:SET YOUR THRESHOLD LEVEL TO 1 by eightball · · Score: 1
      It is up to the conscience as a moderator to voluntarily lower the threshold in order to find the gems.

      As a reader, you do nobody but yourself good or ill from not reading non-moderated AC posts. And I agree with swordgeek in that the signal to noise in a post-moderated discussion aren't worth worring about.

      There is usually little reason to legitimately post anonymously. If they truly want to contribute to the community, I don't think it is too much to ask them to take responsibility (and credit). etc, etc....

  49. There is an easy solution.... by RayChuang · · Score: 1

    Folks,

    It should be noted that Windows 2000 is still quite a ways from being shipped for overseas editions. The North American edition (for US/Canadian use) will ship on February 17, 2000; the versions for European users will probably not ship for at least a month after that.

    There's still time to substitute a different disk defragmenter (or remove it altogether) to comply with German laws. For example, doesn't Symantec make a version of Norton Utilities for Windows NT? This means the German version of Windows 2000 will use Symantec's disk defragmenter instead of Diskkeeper.

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
  50. Compuserve Germany by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1
    I believe the Compuserve chief was declared innocent (or at least had his sentence removed) only last week.

    For those who doesn't know, German law said that the people who owned the Internet providers were personally responsible for everything that the customers put on the Internet, which lead to the Compuserve boss being sentenced to jail for, I believe, pedophelia (since Compuserve Germany hadn't monitored all Internet traffic in and out and stopped a customer from distributing nude pictures of children)!

    I believe the ban will never be a reality. Good thing too. I have no love for Scientology, but this is absurd.

    ************************************************ ***

    --

    Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

  51. Clarification: church ban not German law by hzo · · Score: 1

    To clarify that Scientology produced disk
    defragmentation thing:

    It is the German catholic church which is opposing
    Windows 2000 because of that piece of software
    This has nothing to do with German government or
    German laws (not yet :)

    As so often, IMHO moral and business are often
    pretty close together. Among moral considerations,
    churches see Scientology as competition for the
    souls and the purses of their faithful.

    The church ban
    was often used in former times to fight against
    individuals which were not in line
    with religious (or political) ideas of those at
    the top of the catholic church.

    More famous people banned were Martin Luther (in 1521),
    who later translated the bible from Latin into a
    living language and queen Elisabeth I of England (in 1570).

    So if you should get banned by accident, you are
    in prominent company :)


    --

  52. Reasonable assessment of threat not paranoia by FreeUser · · Score: 4

    The Germans are concerned about Scientology's well documented track record for

    - suppressing free speach through legal intimidation
    - violating people's privacy through various means, legal and otherwise
    - efforts to gain positions of trust and power
    - willingness to use such positions to promote their own corporate ... ah, religious ... goals

    They are concerned that Scientology is engaged in a power grab of titanic proportions which poses a direct threat to their democracy, which the above pattern of behavior appears to underscore rather clearly. Having a corporation controlled by Scientologists in turn controlling a critical peice of software (such as, say, an integral component of an operating system running on 95% of all PCs) is, they feel, a grave concern.

    OTOH if a scientologist contributes to Linux, the code is under the GPL. This takes control away from the Scientologists and puts it in the hands of the user. I doubt the German government would have any problem with that, though I suspect the hypothetical Scientologist contributing software of this kind might face immediate excommunication for giving away "intellectual" property which could have belonged to The Church. :-) (one must use a very liberal definition of intellectual to include anything written by Hubbard. Talk about horrible science fiction!).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  53. Re:The Church by Jjaks · · Score: 1

    You're wrong. Executive Software is part of WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises), and that bothers the Germans. As they say in the article, the Germans consider WISE an organisation committed to spying on and undermining the economy. The fact that individuals who are scientologists may have contributed to the coding of Linux, or that individuals employed by Red Hat (or others) may be scientologists wouldn't bring about the same reactions in Germany.

  54. My Translation by orcrist · · Score: 1

    Note: I am a native speaker of English who has been studying in Germany for 4 years; my German is basically fluent, though my English seems to be degrading ;-)

    My notes are italicized.


    Windows 2000 in danger of being banned

    A component of Windows 2000 comes from a Scientology company. The defragmentation program "Diskeeper" will be released to the market in February as an integrated part of the NT successor. It is being developed by the company Executive Software belonging to (or led by?) the admitted Scientologist Craig Jensen, as reported in c't 25/99. The connection between the (Psyho: here I read psychological, in the sense that it's not just a regular company but based on the philosophy of Scientology) company and the software giant has been a thorn in the eye of sect specialists/observers from the large churches.

    "This will be of interest not only to the Catholic Church, but also to all States (in the sense of 'California is a State'), the Verfassungsschutz (This is the division of the government concerned with protecting the German Constitution), as well as the German industry", commented Harald Baer, the Catholic specialist/agent (person assigned to a certain task; my English is really deteriorating) for sects and worldview (though Weltanschauung is used in English too), to the German Press Agency (dpa). In the view of Ursula Caberta, Chairperson for the Hamburg (the state!) Internal Affairs: Scientology Task-force, Executive Software is one of the leading companies in the Scientology organisation WISE (World Institute of Scientology Enterprises). WISE is the "...key arm/branch of Scientology for infiltrating and spying on the Economy". In the States of Bavaria and Hamburg there are government-policies which forbid agencies -- particularly those in the area of information technologies (basically computers) -- from purchasing services from Scientology companies.



    Chris

    --
    San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
    1. Re:My Translation by nine9 · · Score: 1

      Your translation is very good indeed. I study German too, but I did need to look up quite a few constructions...

    2. Re:My Translation by orcrist · · Score: 1

      Your translation is very good indeed.

      Thank you

      I study German too

      You probably read that sentence a bit too quickly, I study in Germany, Munich to be exact. I don't study German, though I am majoring in Linguistics.

      Chris

      --
      San Francisco values: compassion, tolerance, respect, intelligence
  55. Re:I this even M$'s fault this time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    This is odd- Germany is going to ban Win2000 because of a underlaying application? I am very much not a M$ advocate but this does not sound fair.

    Germany seems to defend itself against an intelligence organisation trying to undermine the democratic system. This intelligence organisation happens to be the one of the CoS. An organisation which hasn't precisely a track record of lawful, democratic behaviour and respecting human rights.

    It's the dammed right of the German government to decide which type of software from what organisation they want to run on government computers. It is as well the dammed right of the German church to run or not run whatever software they want on their system.

    The problem here is, that it is closed software, so there is no easy way to find out if it is harmless or not. Would it be open-source, this wouldn't be much of an issue, since then they would be able to check the code, independent of who wrote the software. They have chosen not to trust software related to the CoS - fine. Most of us have chosen not to trust software related to MS - very fine. So, if it's fair for us to bann some MS software from our computers, it's their dammed fucking right to do so on theirs.

    The remaining question is, why do we Americans react so sensitive to any news /. reports from Germany? I suggest some answeres:

    • We have gone through a sensibility training regarding Germany by our, not always neutral, media. So we are hypercritical.
    • We don't bother to check the facts. How many of us have read a trustworthy translation of the original German article before posting?
    • We don't bother to check the facts, because it's in a foreign language, and the short, rough slashdot article, with tabloid style headline is enough to fuel our prejustice.
    • Who cares about foreigeners anyhow?
    • Hate feels good. Hating Germans is accepted by our society. So it's feeling good without feeling guilty.
  56. Another dangerous cult. by sien · · Score: 1

    Personally, I have a lot of sympathy with German laws against scientology. Scientology does do some good, it really does get people dried out, but it also really does people over, a friends brother joined and the whole issue was horrible.

    But I really think another dangerous cult, that of Bill and MS, should also probably be banned in Germany. Chairman Bill has inspired his minions into countless evil acts, and even the US government is being forced to investigate this horrible religion and it's icon "the blue screen" before too much more damage is done.....


    PS ( I really like Natalie Portman )

  57. Co$ by finkployd · · Score: 2

    I'd really like to know if Andover.net gets any death threats or lawyer threats over this one. The Co$ is a pretty well known cult/terrorist org and has fscked up some people I know (it doesn't pay to try to leave the Co$, kind of like the mafia)

    As for Germany, good for them. If the WTO doesn't like it, fsck them! Germany is a soverign nation and they can do what they want. Sometimes in this messed up world, it's kind of nice to see a country stand up for it's ideals. It's a shame more countries don't take a stand against this money scamming cult.

    Finkployd

    Beware clams, I'm Xenu!

    hehe


  58. Re:What's totally awesome? by jilles · · Score: 2

    Scientology practices extortion and other bad things. The german government is very right in staying clear of anything this organization is involved with.

    Actually I think the idea of MS teaming up with a scientology owned company is pretty ironic. Believe me MS' fud practices are amateurism compared to what scientology is capable of.

    Some might claim that prohibiting an organization like scientology goes against free speech but does free speech include extortion practices?

    --

    Jilles
  59. Re:Trying to cover your ass, eh? by Phill+Hugo · · Score: 1

    I care little what religion people subscribe to when I use their software. Would you feel happy if your comments here were removed simply becuase you were [insert discriminatory reason]?

    I am not a Microsoft apologist, nor do I think scientology anything other than complete junk but I do think it stupid to cheer on these sorts of things just becuase it suits one specific purpose. Should that purpose ever be joined by less popular ones (such as the Pope asking that Catholics don't use GNU becuase Stallman is atheist) I'm you'd get the point.

    Phill

  60. Official English Translation by nullspace · · Score: 2

    For those who may want an accurate translation of the article, view this article from the authors of the article: Translation Link.

  61. Sparkling wine :-)) by lgresse · · Score: 1

    Here is the explanation of the sparkling wine stuff. In German, Sekt means a kind of German sparkling wine. Sekte means Sect. Interestingly their plural is similar or quiet close and Babelfish goes wrong... A+ L

  62. now that's a twist by arielb · · Score: 1

    Microsoft and Scientology are 2 organizations that try to get you into giving them lots of money. So it's not surprising they'd join together. Anyway, even if this isn't an official ban on W2K, the scientology link is very bad for Microsoft in Germany. I'm sure alot of people here in the US and around the world are also disgusted by this cult. Also, a modern file system shouldn't defrag, period.

    --
    ---
  63. You thought BabelFish was bad? Try GPLTrans... by pnot · · Score: 1
    Since GPLTrans' German translations are working now, I thought I'd give it a go. Giving it the URL didn't work, so I cut-and-pasted, and three minutes later GPLTrans came up with this:

    Windows 2000 impends truncated Bann one component from Windows 2000 stammt from einer Scientology-Firma. that Defragmentierungsprogramm "Diskeeper" desired im february than fester ingredient des NT-Nachfolgers to come onto the market developed becomes it from the inc Executive software des bekennenden Scientologen Craig Jensen, as c't into issuance 25/99 refered. tue chaining among dem Psycho-Konzern and dem Softwareriesen is Sektenbeauftragten the großen churches truncated thorn im eye. "Das becomes doesn only tue katholische church interessieren, sondern also all Bundesländer, den... etc. etc.

    Not quite useable yet then. I have my doubts about the effectiveness of brute-force word lookup, no matter how many people you have adding to your database.

    1. Re:You thought BabelFish was bad? Try GPLTrans... by geert · · Score: 1
      Brute force word lookup is especially difficult with German because German words can be concatenated infinitely to form new German words. In English they just put all words sequentially, while in German they concatenate.

      Every time I want to look up in the dictionary a German words that's longer than 10 characters, I have to split it in parts and look them up separately. This doesn't happen with French and English. And Dutch is something in between :-)

  64. This news made my day by leereyno · · Score: 3

    As an ex-scientologist news like this just makes me laugh with joy. Scientology is an evil cult whose goal is to take over the world and imprison or kill anyone who doesn't agree with them. Anyone who has spent any time in it can tell you that. Just look up the Fair Game PL. Scientology claims to be a religion but in fact the religious trappings it puts on are for PR and legal protection. It's no more a religion than Amway is. It's true nature is more like the Nazi party of the 1930's. If anyone could recognize this, its the Germans.

    Many scientologists as individuals are decent honest people. Its unfortunate that they have made such a poor choice in remaining in the "church." I could go on all day long about them, but many others have already covered it and more eloquently than I could.

    What is the difference between Scientology and Microsoft? One is an evil cult bent on world domination and the other was begun by L. Ron Hubbard.

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  65. Theres some sound reason in this, really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...bear with me on this one. Germany is one of the few gubbamints' that actually bothered to investigate scientology a fair bit. What they found as far as I can figure is that they are a psuedo doomsday cult, and aren't above helping the doom along a little. The idea is that they might be motivated to *intetntionally* put malicious code into their programs. Since W2K has had a defragger since at least RC1 (and needed it since NT 3.5 as any NT admin could tell you!) and will have it in the final release... Even though I love linux like the rest of slashdot, by the end of 2000 (BTW, the 'true' end of scmillenium: 11:59 12.31.00 :) there will be a fair share of W2K installed arund the world. Now, could you imagine if the friendly little app that microsoft ingested just happens to have a timer in it? BOOM bzzzzzzt /delete/ OR, how about data mining? The scientologist love to gather dirt on people and use it to get their way, a la Hoover and his Female Body Inspectors. Microshit might not have gotten the source to it, or it might be under control by a department or whatever composed of mainly people who worked/owned the previous company. Either way, the shitologists likely have access and control to the code. Ok I know its paranoid, but this is the 'reasoning' behind restricing software used. Its similar to most agencies having 'quality control' and specifications (like US of A's infamous C2 level requirements) dictation what will and won't be installed. Maybe some gubbamints out there will realize *anyone* could put what they want in the code...and demand Open Source :) Buh Bye M$ in respective country if anyone ever puts that particular 2+2 together ;)

  66. Re:L. Ron Hubbard by Khan · · Score: 1

    heh...this is the most intelligent post yet! I bet the clams are squirming all over the place concerning this post. Too fscking bad for them ;)

    --

    "Klaatu, verada, necktie!" -Ash

  67. But it IS already sold in Germany by MS · · Score: 1
    Look here:

    http://www.btb-online.de/software/dkp 40wi.htm

    Diskeeper is already sold in Germany, so why would it be a problem for Microsoft to sell it as well?

    :-)
    ms

  68. I don't doubt it. by leereyno · · Score: 1

    Natalie Portman in addition to being talented and gorgeous, is also from Israel. Scientology isn't exactly fond of Jews even though it doesn't promote this aspect of the belief system. Truthfully they are not fond of anyone or any group that isn't tied to scientology. Anything outside of the Co$ is considered inferior or corrupt and is generally called "wog" which is a british term equivalent to "nigger."

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  69. They did it to Mission impossible by JagerMeister · · Score: 1

    When Mission impossible came out, I remember the german people and the church boycotting the film becasue Tom Cruise is a Scientologist, and as a result it did poorly in German. And since the scientologist movement is still alive, I can only imagine that anti-scientologist sentiment will strengthen.

    --
    ---- Say thank you to Dr. Pickel
  70. They beat the IRS at their own game by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

    > You really have got to wonder about a cult that can scare the IRS into submission.

    Not really. They just
    a) moved all their money off-shore, outside the jurisdiction of the IRS (hence legally being external to the Internal Revenue Service), and
    b) then adopted tactics of the IRS by spreading misinformation, fear, intimidation and harrassment. Of course paying off a few IRS people helped too.

    What you have to be scared of is your friends and loved ones being brainwashed by the cult.

    Cheers

  71. L Ron Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When Scientology is outlawed, only outlaws will be Scientologists!

    Oh. I guess that's already the case.

  72. Some points from the full German article by Twinky · · Score: 3
    You can find an English translation of the newsbit on the Heise Server. They promised to post a translation of the full article over the weekend.

    The article contains some more details:

    • Diskkeeper has of course access to the full harddisk.
    • c't could find no obvious hints that the software is spying.
    • Of course you can only be sure when you have the source.
    • Microsoft, it seems, has the code.
    • Microsoft's Recommendation (to uninstall Diskkeeper) is not working. The files will be restored by the `System File Protection' (SFP).
    It will be worth to wait for the translation. It will contain some more background information.
    1. Re:Some points from the full German article by platypus · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's Recommendation (to uninstall Diskkeeper) is not working. The files will be restored by the `System File Protection' (SFP).

      Oh my, I thought all the time that this SFP thingy will be a major pain in the ass, seems like I was right.

    2. Re:Some points from the full German article by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      The worst is how it insists on reinstalling *fonts* that you have uninstalled. I don't know how or why the "MS Comic Book" font is a system file, but there it keeps reappearing.

      Plus no configuration interface that I can see, not even in the registry. Another software victory for MS.
      --

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    3. Re:Some points from the full German article by greenrd · · Score: 1
      Plus no configuration interface that I can see, not even in the registry

      WHAT THE F***!?! This is even scarier than I thought. Undeletable trojans, here we come...

  73. CmdrTaco watched by a private dick... by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 3

    Scientology agents are watching my house

    Slashdot | Posted by CmdrTaco on 1999-0-0
    from the just-because-you're-paranoid dept.

    About twenty minutes ago, a gang of three Scientology agents collected outside Taco Mansions. They tried to harass one of my visitors when they arrived, telling them that I was hosting child pornography and was a convicted felon. If anyone's in the XXX area just now, you might like to come and look, they're on the corner of XXX and XXX. I've posted PNG images of them *here*. I could use some backup on this one.

    Cheers,
    CmdrTaco.

    No, I don't think the Co$ would be stupid enough to try that one. The Commander is far from powerless.
    --

  74. Here's part of the reason ...... by taniwha · · Score: 3
    After WW2 the Allies left the Germans with a constitutions that bans organisation which plan world domination .... which just happens to be one of $cientology's goals (well that and chasing away all the space aliens that are haunting them).

    This is one of the main reasons that Germany is down on Scientology (that and some real estate scams by its members)

    1. Re:Here's part of the reason ...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      After WW2 the Allies left the Germans with a constitutions that bans organisation which plan world domination

      This is historically not correct (hell, the moderation system gets worse recently). The German constitution (actully, until the reunification ten years ago, it was formally not even a constitution), was not given by the allies. The so called Grundgesetz (basic law, fundation law), was written by Germans. A lot of them were victims of the Nazi regime.

      The fact that it is much different than e.g. the US constitution, the British, or the Frensh one (you don't want to have the sovejt union one of that time at all, do you?) demonstrates that not a particular constitution of the allies was used and copied.

      It is actually one of the brightest moments in German democracy that the constitution was written by Germans, for Germans, and brought into effect by the German people, not by some allied ruling.

      Of course the democratic allies insisted on and supported the process of getting a democratic constitution. For sure, they didn't left the Germans with one. When the Grundgesetz was signed and proclaimed in 1949, all the allies still hang around in Germany. Hey, they didn't even leave until today (ok, ok the sovjet union is gone) :-)

    2. Re:Here's part of the reason ...... by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      nono you got that all backwards! Co$ _likes_ the eenie aliens insides us all! (Thetans), more thetans=more happy, kinda like Parasitic Smartdrugs.

      Hugs SlashDread

    3. Re:Here's part of the reason ...... by DrMaurer · · Score: 1

      "US constitution, the British, or the Frensh one "

      If I remember correctly, and I may not, the British don't have a Constitution in the way the US does because they work on the concept of common law.

      I could be wrong, could a English-person or someone with more of a clue clerify this for me.

      As for the rest of the post, I pretty much agree with it. I mean, people have different biases, and some people have an unfortunate history that some think will (and may) repeat itself.

      bye

      --
      Dan
    4. Re:Here's part of the reason ...... by lordsutch · · Score: 2

      (you don't want to have the sovejt union one of that time at all, do you?)

      Actually, the Soviet Union had a fairly liberal constitution (as does the People's Republic of China). However, it (obviously) was not followed in practice.

      --
      My Blog. Sela Ward can sell me long distanc
  75. What is this all about? by omnifrog · · Score: 1

    I've been a reader of /. for about 6 months. Normally everyone is honest, direct, and polite. What is up with this "Natalie Portman" thing? Where can I find a history lesson? Thanks

    1. Re:What is this all about? by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 2

      I've been a reader of /. for about 6 months. Normally everyone is honest, direct, and polite. What is up with this "Natalie Portman" thing?

      It's been explained in a few other threads, but just in case you missed them, here's what happened:

      Humour site Segfault recently had to disable user comments because the system was being abused; a number of people were posting obscene comments about Natalie Portman and Mae Ling Mak. Every story on Segfault ended up with obscene comments attached to it.

      Because Segfault no longer allows commenting, the idiots who posted such comments appear to have migrated en masse to this site. At least we have moderators who can do something about this abuse.

      -Stephen (who had never even heard of Mae Ling Mak before the Segfault fiasco, and still hasn't got a clue who she is)

  76. What is a church? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The central question about scientology is whether it is considered a church or not. While the US constitution protects basically everything that calls itself a church, this is not the case in many different countries. In germany scientology is not considered a church but an organisation with a clear financial purpose. However, there are laws that prohibit some form of moneymaking and scientology uses some of them. That's where the illegal stuff comes in.

    1. Re:What is a church? by Cullison · · Score: 1

      I dunno, an income tax for churches seems kinda like a money making scheme to me. Seems the Catholic and Lutheran churches are living pretty high on the hog in Germany. Those two churches own more land than any company or organization in Germany except the German government. And it was the NAZIS who originally instituted that tax for those two churches, to buy them off. If the leaders of those churches had any shame at all for the activities of their predecessors for allowing the Holocaust to occur... well, if it were me, I'd have refused to accept any such money collected! But, we are talking millions and millions of deutschmarks, and, well... it's nice work if you can get it. Furthermore, German COURTS OF LAW have recognized Scientology as a religion. Dozens of times. What form of money-making is outlawed? Scientology derives income from services and from materials (books, tapes, etc.). Now, surely certain jurisdictions have tried to outlaw the ways that Scientology promotes itself and gets income, but these were not illegal until those jurisdictions decided to try to find ways to destroy Scientology -- and even German courts have found that such laws were themselves unconsitutional! So, please, enlighten us.

  77. Microsoft code reviews by daviddennis · · Score: 2

    You know, if they didn't have any, it might explain a few things :-)

    Seriously, the Church of Scientology is a nasty group of people. I don't know how comfortable I am with a connection between them and the software platform virtually everyone has to use at some point.

    D

    ----

    1. Re:Microsoft code reviews by DanMcS · · Score: 2

      Seriously, the Church of Scientology is a nasty group of people. I don't know how comfortable I am with a connection between them and the software platform virtually everyone has to use at some point.
      OK, I don't like the CoS's practices. But the fact that a software writer happens to be a Scientologist has no bearing on his program's utility. Do you seriously think that using a program written by a Scientologist's company will harm you in some way? Maybe it will give you Scientologist germs, and you might catch Scientology and turn into one yourself! Oh no! heh. If it's the best tool for the job, use it.

      --
      Communication is only possible between equals
    2. Re:Microsoft code reviews by daviddennis · · Score: 2

      Oh, not in those terms, no.

      But they do have an interesting record infiltrating various organizations, so the thought that a Scientology-sourced program might send confidential data to the Church would not be out of line.

      I realize it sounds absurd, but crazier things have happened - check the history of this bizarre organization before dismissing it out of hand.

      D

      ----

  78. ENGLISH VERSION OF ARTICLE... by Bananenrepublik · · Score: 2

    is here. That link has been obviously added later at the bottom of the original German article.

  79. constitution by emmons · · Score: 1



    ahhh, i love americans. (yes, I am american too)
    We're so ignorant about the world. Hmm, let me start. Firstly, the EU doesn't care if germany censors films, software, etc. They'd be delighted... two reasons: germany is the EU, and the EU stays away from domestic issues as to not piss off any of the member states.

    "this amounts to state censorship, and should not be tolerated"

    Well cowboys, germany ain't the good 'ol US. They have their own constitution. And it allows state censorship. And ask any german, they like it that way. *my god! they like it you say!* Yes, they like it. You cannot show a film in germany depicting nazis as good people for society. Nazis cannot organize anything. You cannot be a nazi. (it's legal but you won't live long)

    "Also, do the German government intend to ban all John Travolta (or any other star related to the Scientologist) films?"

    Well, at least you get relative freedom of religion here. But weather or not it's a religion is up to the government to decide. The church and state are not seperate here. There are 3 religion classes in the public schools. You can choose catholic, lutheran or neither/none (ethics). You must take one. If you want to be catholic or lutheran you pay a tax that goes to the church. Otherwise you don't get married or buried by them. I think the tax is a 2% income tax. *what's that you say? no seperation of church and state! my god!*

    hmm. what else should we nice americans learn today? oh yeah. porn is legal. so is alcohol. A 16 year old can go to a grocery store and legally buy a condom, porn mag, beer and a pack of camels. And he can enjoy them too. But if the light doesn't work on his bike when he rides home the police will stop him, give him a ticket for the light and tell him to have a fun night.

    Know a little about another society before you start saying what they can and can't do, would ya please?



    Now if you would please excuse me, I'm going to eat dinner, go to the pub and have a good german ale. I'm 17 and it's legal.



    -----

    --
    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    1. Re:constitution by nhowie · · Score: 1

      ahhh, i love americans. (yes, I am american too)

      I am not American, see the '.co.uk' bit in my URL. Hence the RMS/communist dig. Don't assume things like that, and don't write such patronising crap in your posts (this applies to much of the post).

      Firstly, the EU doesn't care if germany censors films, software, etc. They'd be delighted... two reasons: germany is the EU, and the EU stays away from domestic issues as to not piss off any of the member states.

      You got the bit about Germany being the EU right at least, but what planet do you live on if you think the EU stays away from domestic issues??? Anyways, W2K is an American product, so if it had been an outright ban (my apologies for that mistake), then it would not be a 'domestic' issue, also I thought the EU liked pissing off members states other than Germany (Not that the UK is at all bitter;)

      And why bring up the nazis? The attrocities committed by the nazis are something that should not be forgotten, but that's no reason to treat all "subversive" groups the same way. As dangerous as the Scientologists might be, I don't think they're even in the same league as the nazis.

      It doesn't matter anyway, since I got the wrong end of the stick about the 'banning' bit.

    2. Re:constitution by emmons · · Score: 1

      my apologies, I should have checked your web address. I don't want to insult you, but your post did sound quite american.

      The thing I brought up about the nazis had to do not with them but with the fact that the government can sensor. And yes, in the case of nazi propoganda it is a very good thing.

      When I said the EU doesn't care about domestic issues, I mean it tries not to get into issues unique to each state, unless of course major human rights violations are being made. As I uderstand it the EU is primarily for trade and economic unification, with the added benefit of giving europe more weight in international affairs.

      I apologize, I went off a bit when I read the part about "this amounts to state censorship, and should not be tolerated". I assumed it was another arrogant american assuming everyone has the first amendment. I went overboard with the sarcasm too.

      -----

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    3. Re:constitution by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      First of all: EU law overrules federal German law as German federal Law overrules state Law. Each country has five years to adopt the EU ruling to their laws.

      Speaking of Germany is the EU. It's only insofar correct, that most rulings aren't ratified, if Germany doesn't approve. Did you notice the word "most"?

      Furthermore, not a single EU law gets ratified, without every single of the fifteen nations approving. May it be Germany, Great Britain, or Luxembourgh.As it has been ratified at Maastricht.

      The German goverment has to report to European Court like any other member of the European Union.

      "this amounts to state censorship, and should not be tolerated""

      RTFM (Read the fucking manual) // Will this be censored?

      Taken from http://www.lib.byu.edu/~rdh/eurodocs/germ/ggeng.ht ml

      1. BASIC RIGHTS (A little bit abridged by me)

      Article 1 (Protection of human dignity). (1) The dignity of man is inviolable. To respect and protect it is the duty of all state authority. (2) ... (3) ...

      Article 2 (Rights of liberty). (1) Everyone has the right to the free development of his personality insofar as he does not violate the rights of others or offend against the constitutional order or the moral code. // Plain text: Do what you want as long you don't care to destroy democracy (2) Everyone has the right to life and to inviolability of his person. The freedom of the individual is inviolable. These rights may only be encroached upon pursuant to a law. // You may only sentenced to prison by law

      Article 3 (Equality before the law). (1) ... (2) ... (3) No one may be prejudiced or favored because of his sex, his parentage, his race, his language, his homeland and origin, his faith or his religious or political opinions. // Just to emphasize

      Article 4 (Freedom of faith, of conscience and of creed). (1) Freedom of faith and of conscience, and freedom of creed religious or ideological, are inviolable. (2) The undisturbed practice of religion is guaranteed. (3) ...

      Article 5 (Freedom of expression). (1) Everyone has the right to freely express and to disseminate his opinion by speech, writing and pictures and freely to inform himself from generally accessible sources. Freedom of the press and freedom of reporting by radio and motion pictures are guaranteed. There shall be no censorship. (2) These rights are limited by the provisions of the general laws, the provisions of law for the protection of youth and by the right to inviolability of personal honor. (3) ....

      Article 18 (Forfeiture of basic rights). Whoever abuses freedom of opinion, in particular freedom of the press (Article 5, paragraph 1) .. in order to attack the free democratic basic order, forfeits these basic rights. The forfeiture and its extent are pronounced by the Federal Constitutional Court. // Not by the State // And not the "dignity of man" or "the right to life and the inviolability of his person"

      "(it's legal but you won't live long)" I hope I misunderstood that passage, may it be my inability of english or yours

      "But weather or not it's a religion is up to the government to decide." No, the Court as in any democratic society

      Makes me think of the Palmer Raids and Red Scare. Article 1 might have come handy in this situation. btw. amnesty international lists the US as one of the nations in which the human rights are frequently violated by official action (death penalty, overcrowded prisons)

      "The church and state are not seperate here" Article 140 refers to Article 137 of the Weimar Constitution: There is no state church. ...

      "There are 3 religion classes... "

      What happens in schools lies not in the jurisdication of the government. The states ("Laender") make the school laws. In fact, I didn't have to go to religion classes, most people didn't go, (I did although I'm an atheist)

      AFAIK, in Berlin, nowadays, there is the possibility to go to muslim classes

      "hmm. what else should we nice americans learn today? oh yeah. porn is legal. so is alcohol. A 16 year old can go to a grocery store and legally buy a condom, porn mag, beer and a pack of camels. ..."

      porn is illegal in germany. porn in the sense that the "sexual act is depicted in a noncensual way, brutal, egoistical way, ..."

      Following the article 5 in consideration of Article 2 and 1

      If you consider magazines like Playboy as porn, yes you can buy such magazines being sixteen years of age.

      "..buy a condom..." You even get them for free as presents by parties and others, on the one hand as a reminder on the other hand as a joke.

      There is a four times higher teenage pregnancy rate in the US than in Germany. That makes me think.

      Don't tell me, just because it's illegal teenager, don't drink in the states.

      "Know a little about another society before you start saying what they can and can't do, would ya please?"

      Isn't that ironic? What is more dangerous incomplete/incorrect knowledge or no knowledge at all?

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  80. My favorite line from the translation by Steelehead · · Score: 1

    The connection between the Psycho company and the software giant is sparkling wine-assigned the large churches a thorn in the eye.

    --
    -- 100% MS-Free as of 4-4-1999, 11:47:38 PST. "The lapdance is always better when the stripper is cryin'" Free Kevin,
  81. Re:It's a "Bann", better believe it. by mazur · · Score: 2
    And come on, let's get real: You don't seriously believe that anyone in the goverment would stop Microsoft from shipping Windows 2000 to Germany, are you?

    I, for one, do believe that: when a user of xs4all in the Netherlands published a copy of the German forbidden radical-left magazine Radikal on his homepage, the German government instituted a ban to all of xs4all from Germany, which got widespread implementation, thereby also banning access to Dutch writer Karin Spainks anti-Scientology pages one the same site. So I don't see why a ban on Windoze Y2K would not be similarly accepted and followed. xs4all sued, but I can't remember the outcome.

    --
    The truth shall make you fret. (Ankh-Morpork tImes motto)
  82. Executive Crapware by thermal_noise · · Score: 1

    Much better to use the excellent free stuff from www.sysinternals.com for all of us who are stuck with at least one Windows machine at work.

  83. Re:this is a load of crap - no it is not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    >WTF do you think a democratic company
    This is probably meant to mean "country". ;-)
    >would ban a software because of the religion
    >of its authors?
    Yes, I think that is perfectly possible. (I am German, so I think I know something about German politics.)
    Scientology is not regarded as a church in Germany but as a criminal organisation trying to subvert companies and governments.
    Note that the article on heise.de is so far only talking about the opinion of a spokesperson of the catholic church.
    But many companies and government agencies have a policy of not buying any services from companies that have connections to Scientology. This is because they are concerned they might get subverted by them. (Which is quite possible, just imagine such a person installing BackOrifice on a database server in a government agency.)

    regards
    Thomas

  84. Scientologists writing GPLed software? by lordsutch · · Score: 2

    Would the Germans also ban software under the GPL written by Scientologists? I think it's a fairly safe bet that at least some GPLed code was written by one...

    (This sounds like a non-tariff barrier, rather than a legitimate social concern. Unless the software is designed to convert people into Scientologists, or Nazis, or tree-huggers, I can't see any good reason to ban it.)

    --
    My Blog. Sela Ward can sell me long distanc
  85. Co$ in a nutshell by finkployd · · Score: 3

    The Co$ is pretty much a terrorist cult that uses money, lawsuits, and worse to silence opposition. They basically prey on weak minded people and exploit them for money, work, you name it.
    Basically, they are a corporation pretending to be a religion to get tax breaks. There are lots of sites on the net dealing with these people, the largest of which is Operation Clambake. An interesting note is that the Co$ distributes internet software to it's drones that have nearly all of these sites, newsgroups, and such filtered out.

    Finkployd

    1. Re:Co$ in a nutshell by finkployd · · Score: 2

      Have you ever SEEN a Co$ intro video? They can only be described as comedies :) I've visited a local recruiting house and after what I saw and listened to, I still cannot imagine anyone joining with these people.
      However, it's possible that my experience was not representative of how they normaly work.

      Finkployd

  86. stupidity will out by wmeyer · · Score: 1

    Come on, people, let's be as intelligent as we think we are. If a company is run by a Mormon, does that make their software Mormon software? The US (mistakenly supposed to have been founded on principles of religious freedom -- it wasn't -- it was founded to let people practice their own flavor of persecution) has long been a hotbed of narrow and provincial thinking. The small town in which I was raised (in Michigan, not the south) was, until the 30s, restricted (no blacks, Jews, or Catholics, thank you.) It only changed because the law made it do so.

    There are good and bad people in every company, country, and religion. Many religions look pretty cockeyed to one not raised within them. All religions look cockeyed to an atheist. Focus on purpose, not packaging.

    Supposedly we hate M$ for their bloated and buggy software, not for their money. Yet the current DOJ action is money-motivated, not anything to do with either merchantibility or fitness of purpose, either of which might provide clear grounds for action against them.

    I have German ancestry. Having said that, I can also say that my German grandfather was the most narrow-minded, hidebound, and opinionated man I knew while I was growing up. Does that make all Germans the same? Of course not.

    On the matter of religion, I believe in a Creator. I do not believe in organized religion. I dislike Churches for the same reason I dislike M$ and governments: large organizations typically give rise to petty tyrants and corruption. In smaller organizations they have nowhere to hide while amassing their power.

    Software is written by people, not by churches. From what I know, Executive Software is a company motivated by commercial desires, as is M$, as is Be, Inc., as is Red Hat. If we do not care about the religious beliefs of Bob Young, or of Jean Louis Gasee, why then should we care about the religious beliefs of Craig Jensen?

    A mind is a terrible thing to waste. Let's not waste ours on the ignorance of persecution and paranoia.

    --
    --- Bill
  87. freedom's cost is misfits by peter303 · · Score: 1

    We see that on the internet- unpopular groups
    have their say, so that everyone can use it
    openly and cheaply.
    The German Government doesn't get what freedom
    is about if this article is true.

  88. death threats by prok · · Score: 1

    Ah yes, the dark practices of the "Church" of Scientology. My high school German teacher had a great story about scientology. Back in his younger days, he angered the church enough that they declared him officially dead. So somewhere in the churches files, there is record of my teacher's death, even though he is quite alive to this day. (apparently he was supposed to die after they declared him dead... don't ask)

    I dunno, people like that freak me out. The German govt. is right to be suspicious of them even if their measures may seem extreme at times.

  89. Why start with Windows 2000? by Jonathan+C.+Patschke · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, the filesystem-inspecific optimization routines present in Windows NT had been written by Executive Software back for NT 3.51 Service Pack 2. From what I remember, to run Diskeeper on Windows NT 3.51 (or was it 3.5?), you needed to install an Executive-software specific kernel to replace the Microsoft-standard Windows NT kernel. The Executive Software kernel added a few NT-native function calls that talked directly to the filesystem drivers to move blocks of data around and return various statistics (the sort of which generally aren't of interest to software running atop to OS, but vital to the OS itself). Basically, it was a layer of abstraction that let priviledged processes talk to the FS drivers through a standard interface (sort-of like ioctl()IIRC, Microsoft thought that this was a good enough idea (so that someone else could also write a defragmenter for NT) to include in the Microsoft kernel in a certain service release of NT 3.51 (I think it was either SP2 or SP3). Those functions were carried over into Windows NT 4.0. So basically, all versions of Windows NT since 3.51 SPwhatever have had some code written by Executive, albeit not as much as a whole defragmenter. Why now is the German government upset? Is there a lines-of-code limit to how much Scientolgist-written code may exist within a product?

    --
    Pining for the days when The Glorious MEEPT!!! graced SlapDash with his wisdom.
  90. Dose this seem disturbing to anyone else by RevS.A.S. · · Score: 1

    To me it seems a more than a little worrisome that a government wold try to suppress software just because of the religious belief of its programmers. I'm sure the Nazis thought they were justified in oppressing the Jews to. Oppressing religious freedom is the first step on a slippery slope. If the software works and people want to buy it than it should be available.

    --
    I Tell You: One must still have chaos in one to give birth to a dancing star! -Nietzsche
  91. Re:You people are idiots. by Osty · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I was reading a different article than you, but where did it say anything about "[preventing] a threat to its very existence"? Methinks you're the one who has it all wrong.

  92. good thing by bertuzry · · Score: 1

    at least on country has done the right thing and ban microsoft

  93. What would replace Win 2000? by GECK · · Score: 1

    Well, if Windows 2000 were banned, what would the German government use? Slackware? :)

    --
    http://www.livejournal.com/users/whiskeyjuvenile/
  94. he shoulda stuck to SF by dickens · · Score: 1

    As Isaac Asimov said (in his autobio), L. Ron Hubbard should have stuck to Science Fiction. Some of it is pretty good. Asimov could already see that Scientology was a "bad thing". Personally, I only got about half-way through the scientology book before I concluded that these people were psuedo-science spouting lunatics.

    And on another note, if you're lucky enough to have an NT workstation that is stable for several years without DisKeeper, you will be very happy you bought DisKeeper.

    It was a no-brainer for MS to buy DisKeeper, or the rights to it or whatever. It's badly needed on any seriously active NT (FAT or NTFS) file system.

  95. NOt banned.. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Please note.. this is about government 'banning' the use of w2k in ITS OWN OPERATIONS, not banning it from public use or from entering germany.

    This is not much different than other corporations who have certain rules about what kind of software is permitted.

  96. NOT BANNING IT! by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    People, they are possibly banning the use of w2k in government operations, not banning it from sale in the country.

  97. MOD UP the post above! by cymen · · Score: 1

    MOD UP the post above!

  98. GPLtrans isn't CLOSE to being finished by ToastyKen · · Score: 2

    It has a REALLY smart database of phrases right now, since it's getting started.
    But that's no reason to be against it.. it's just that it needs a lot more work.

    However, in addition, it uses a simply phrase-replacement algorithm that I don't hope to much hope in...

  99. Re:Entertainment by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

    Excuse me? Article #59 reads nothing of the sort, and is a perfectly legitimate statement (save the remark specifying the Germans).
    The fact is that the United States doesn't "rule," and is just as fascist in certain areas.

    The United States is better with regard to freedom of speech, and has not yet made illegal Nazism, Scientology, and other "questionable" beliefs.

  100. Re:I am Natalie Portman by Gideon00 · · Score: 1

    heh obviously? Did they leave a hair or something? Or was their choice in few words a dead giveaway?

  101. Deep Six by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    Suggestion for posts that are of interest only to masochists and (meta)-moderators. Use something like 3 strikes (3 independent deep six moderations) to effectively kill the post. Shouldn't use moderator points, but should be near unanimous agreement by meta-moderators.

  102. Re:FIRST POST! by barleyguy · · Score: 1

    #244, this has got to be a record for first posts!!! Fricking idiot!

    --
    --- "So THAT's what an invisible barrier looks like!" - Time Bandits
  103. Argggh by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    Subject: Deep Six (Score: -6)
    got changed to (Score:1)
    This time I'll try preview first.

  104. W2K, the Comic Book OS by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    Thanks, you just made my day.

  105. Smart Germans! by seaportcasino · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm starting to love Germans more and more! Forget about that little World War II thing. You guys are ok in my book! Hell, what am I saying, I'm part German!

  106. Microsoft's freedom to innovate. by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    Thanks, you just put it into perspective.

  107. We sould! And I'm use to be a Moromon. by Jonathan+Hamilton · · Score: 1

    In fact I still attend 10 hours of church a week because I am forced to by my parents. I have gone to church my entire life and started truly questioning the church when i was 14. The false logic that our church uses is amazing.

  108. Disk Defrag... by ph43drus · · Score: 1
    Now, I have yet to use Win2000, but I have had some experience with NT4...

    M$ had said that NT4 didn't need to be defragmented, and people at the hospital where my dad works were instructed not to defrag their NT workstations (NTFS != VFAT and all that).

    Unfortunately, NTFS needs to be defragged, which is a bug in NTFS, and M$ admitted as much by releasing a defrag utility. My dad found his workstation at work horribly defragged, and I do believe this did help with its performance...

    But we users of Linux and Ext2 wouldn't know anything about that kind of problem, now would we?

    Jeff

  109. The Complete Story on our English web site by jkuri · · Score: 1
    I just posted an English translation of our story about Windows 2000, Scientology, the major German Catholic and Lutheran churches and the Government on our web site.

    You can find the article ("Windows 2000 threatened by excommunication") at http://www.heise.de/ct/english/99/25/058/ . The German version of the complete article is at http://www.heise.de/ct/99/25/058".

  110. Not that serious.... by frost22 · · Score: 1

    - the guy is charged with the topict of sects.
    The German Word for that is 'Sekte'. 'Sekt'
    on the other hand is Champagne... so this is
    a Babelfish error.
    - The guy is just speculating. Don't hold
    your breath. The regulation in question is
    aimed at keeping dubious and untrustworthy
    $cientology cover firm from doing government
    related work. I doubt they apply it here.

    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  111. Re:Not Germany is banning!!! It's the Catholic chu by frost22 · · Score: 1

    This is nonsense as well. _The_ catholic
    Church hasn't even a central Authority in
    Germany.

    It is just some guy charged with studying sects,
    who is speculating.

    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  112. More in-depth article by TicTacTux · · Score: 1
    A more in-depth article appeared today in the printed issue as well as in an english translation online here (http://www.heise.de/ct/english/99/25/058/)

    McCarthy strikes back, but this time from a different angle, hehe.

    --
    Use The Source, Luke!
  113. More from an ex-Scientologist by nine9 · · Score: 1
    I think the big problem here is what will happen if Scientology tries to retaliate... Luckily the German Government is quite tough and doesn't makes as many U-turns as ours here in the UK, but they sure will try anything. For example, they tried to close down xenu.net (yeah, I know they didn't succeed, but they still tried)...

    Another thing that is a problem with Scientologists retaliating is that once they've made up their minds, they won't change them... For example, I use Sixdegrees a lot (don't laugh!), and there is a Scientology Discussion Group there. At first I thought they were skeptics, but then I found out they were all bona fide Scienos... OK, so I put my foot in it with a few of my remarks, but eventually they were nice to me... Then this really annoying woman shows up, somehow reads my webpages, and decides I am publishing "bad-PR", and this other guy thinks they should report me to their high hegions...

    It's so annoying!