Huh, sounds exactly opposite my experience there this summer. It's mostly a problem with the department I was with, and having my boss gone for like half the time I was there, and not having any projects to do.
Oh, and also the Sandia bureaucracy is intolerable. They screwed me over so many times it's not even close to funny.
Use adblock, and block all of the admedia/adwhoever javascript includes; most pop-anythings will go away because the commands to activate them aren't there.
Summary of said article: the industry is going to be building 20-years-behind-the-times reactors which will merely replace the existing reactors. And a lot of other hot air/meaningless commentary.
This guy needs to check his facts. No one is trying to say that pebble bed reactors are going to solve the energy crisis. The industry is developing (and has developed) more efficient, smaller, safer 3rd generation PWRs (pressurized water reactors) that use the same concept as traditional reactors but with vastly improved design (source: Nuclear News, November 2004). As a nuclear engineer, I can tell you that these will be the new reactors.
There is, of course, also the point that old reactors are aging. Yes, they are. Maintenance and reevaluations of those facilities are constantly under way, and they will likely be safe to operate for many more years. In the meantime, more modern reactors will be built at an increasing rate that will not only compensate for reactors that must be shut down in the future but also provide more energy.
I remember one season when five times she tried to auto-destruct Voyager to save maybe a single person's life. Ugh. She should have died, not been promoted (I can't believe she's an admiral as per the most recent ST movies).
No, I'm not forgetting them. The salt, er. All right, so maybe the chlorine evolves instead of the oxygen -- but I can't remember the potentials for the different redox reactions (it's been a few years since I took college chemistry).
And the metal isn't going to do anything. And methane won't show up in any possible form.
The NASB is regarded as having the best accuracy, though it doesn't seem too different from the KJV in this instance.
John 2:14 And He found in the temple those who were selling oxen and sheep and doves, and the money changers seated at their tables.
John 2:15 And He made a scourge of cords, and drove them all out of the temple, with the sheep and the oxen; and He poured out the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables; John 2:16 and to those who were selling the doves He said, "Take these things away; stop making My Father's house a place of business."
Slashdot Mirror
Huh, sounds exactly opposite my experience there this summer. It's mostly a problem with the department I was with, and having my boss gone for like half the time I was there, and not having any projects to do.
Oh, and also the Sandia bureaucracy is intolerable. They screwed me over so many times it's not even close to funny.
The Z machine and other magnetic pinch devices already can create fusion (not thermonuclear, though).
You should know that terrorists don't care about landing the plane.
Well done.
The Associated Press doesn't pull April Fools jokes, methinks.
From what I can tell, after that SNAFU with the other tiger pre-release, none of the mac torrent sites dare post any apple torrents on it.
Did he try to sign his name as "not a valid signature"? :P
Use adblock, and block all of the admedia/adwhoever javascript includes; most pop-anythings will go away because the commands to activate them aren't there.
None of the program compared are free
should be None of the programs compared is free
Bipedal (e.g. t-rex) as opposed to quadrupedal (stegosaurus).
The deep-sea fish story was a hoax.
Summary of said article: the industry is going to be building 20-years-behind-the-times reactors which will merely replace the existing reactors. And a lot of other hot air/meaningless commentary.
This guy needs to check his facts. No one is trying to say that pebble bed reactors are going to solve the energy crisis. The industry is developing (and has developed) more efficient, smaller, safer 3rd generation PWRs (pressurized water reactors) that use the same concept as traditional reactors but with vastly improved design (source: Nuclear News, November 2004). As a nuclear engineer, I can tell you that these will be the new reactors.
There is, of course, also the point that old reactors are aging. Yes, they are. Maintenance and reevaluations of those facilities are constantly under way, and they will likely be safe to operate for many more years. In the meantime, more modern reactors will be built at an increasing rate that will not only compensate for reactors that must be shut down in the future but also provide more energy.
Don't forget nuclear power!
Yes. Yes, it is.
Heh, no surprises here. I mean, from what we've seen from the leaked windows source...
Kate Mulgrew (sp?), that little skank.
I remember one season when five times she tried to auto-destruct Voyager to save maybe a single person's life. Ugh. She should have died, not been promoted (I can't believe she's an admiral as per the most recent ST movies).
No, I'm not forgetting them. The salt, er. All right, so maybe the chlorine evolves instead of the oxygen -- but I can't remember the potentials for the different redox reactions (it's been a few years since I took college chemistry).
And the metal isn't going to do anything. And methane won't show up in any possible form.
The water will be electrolyzed into H2 and O2.
2H20 -> 2H2 + O2
You're not going to evolve methane (as the article says). Sheesh.
Once in a while? You mean every other story that he "writes"?
Yeah, you're right; it kind of is par for slashdot to post 60-year-old news.
Good thing! If you hadn't, we'd be in some big trouble.
Stop spamming slashdot.
It doesn't work on safari either.
Er, it's also the other way around. Also.