Slashdot Mirror


Electrolytic Etching, For What A Dremel Can't Do

Dustin writes "A lot of people modify computer cases, often requiring them to cut intricate custom designs in sheet metal. For most, there is the Dremel tool. But sometimes, that just isn't good enough. Possibly due to an insanely complex design, or unsteady hands, a Dremel just might not cut it (pun honestly wasn't intended). JimBob, a member at OverhauledPC.com, has a much better way. Using readily available salt water and electricity, his technique is much easier than trying to cut patterns with a rotary tool."

242 comments

  1. Coral Cache, just in case... by BobPaul · · Score: 4, Informative

    I preloaded this into the Coral Cache, just in case it gets slashdotted.

    Here's the Cache Link if it's needed.

    1. Re:Coral Cache, just in case... by mobets · · Score: 1

      Didn't work, only the first 2 pages. I was trying the same thing :)

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    2. Re:Coral Cache, just in case... by Belfy · · Score: 1

      Good thing.

      Error: 500 Internal Server Error

      Server CoralWebPrx/0.1.12 (See http://coralcdn.org/) at 169.229.50.12:8090

    3. Re:Coral Cache, just in case... by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your link is currently 404 compliant.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    4. Re:Coral Cache, just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I swear to God that Slashdot is spying on me. They have posted an article on practically every page I have looked at in the past few days. I think I need to upgrade my tinfoil hat...

    5. Re:Coral Cache, just in case... by BobPaul · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Your link is currently 404 compliant.
      Well damn! I loaded the whole thing via the coral cache while it was still in the mysterious future... I figured Coral would get a handle on it before it went down... I guess not.

      Damn. There's always mirrordot.com I suppose...

    6. Re:Coral Cache, just in case... by FLEB · · Score: 1

      It's probably just coral-caching the error message.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    7. Re:Coral Cache, just in case... by Buzzard2501 · · Score: 1

      Coral managed to cache the 'The server is too busy at the moment' page before it was ./'ed

      --
      Real programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, it should be hard to understand.
    8. Re:Coral Cache, just in case... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      If you're going to whore youself for a free Mac, at least learn how to emmbed a link.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    9. Re:Coral Cache, just in case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I saw (at the original site, and the archived site) was

      The server is too busy at the moment. Please try again later.

      Pesky slashdotters!

  2. Dremels are bad web server too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or maybe someone used one in the server network cable... no comments and down.

  3. My guess at his method... by Faust7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Using readily available salt water and electricity, his technique is much easier than trying to cut patterns with a rotary tool.

    The site is down. Therefore I will assume that he poured water over the case and shocked the shit out of it.

    You could get some interesting burn patterns that way. You might even match your case.

  4. slashdotted already. by gambit3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    any of the paying Slashdotters wanna grace us with the text?

    I promise you'll get lots of Karma for it! ;)

    1. Re:slashdotted already. by elid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Let me introduce you to mirrordor.

    2. Re:slashdotted already. by nxtr · · Score: 3, Funny

      >>Let me introduce you to mirrordor.

      The Mirrordoor? Is it like the door where you see your self coming into? It only managed to cache the introduction page of the website.

    3. Re:slashdotted already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mirrordor: In an alternate universe the Hobbits reign supreme, with a single ring:

      "One ring to 404 them all..."

    4. Re:slashdotted already. by metlin · · Score: 0, Troll

      > Let me introduce you to mirrordor

      And let me introduce you to good spelling... :-p

    5. Re:slashdotted already. by Kurayamino-X · · Score: 1

      And mirroring only the first page in a multi-page article is usefull how, exactly?

      --
      ...I got nothing.
    6. Re:slashdotted already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      01001001011011100111010001100101011100100110010101 11001101110100011010010110111001100111001000000111 00110110100101100111011011100110000101110100011101 01011100100110010100100000011001100110100101101100 01100101001000000110100101101110011001000110010101 10010101100100001000010010000000100000001110100111 0000

    7. Re:slashdotted already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      776F77207468697320697320707265747479207361642E2E2E 206F6820776169742E2E2E

    8. Re:slashdotted already. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it the album where vaguely proggish rock band Magnum jumped the shark and went all big hair and spandex?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. Wait a minute. by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
    > Electrolytic Etching, For What A Dremel Cant Do

    First off, there's nothing a Dremel can't do.

    But since your alternative involves electricity, water, and chemicals, we'll forgive it. (But next time, could you kindly use something more dangerous than sodium chloride? We've got reputations to uphold here, and if the case mod weren't so danged cool, we'd feel we were slipping.)

    1. Re:Wait a minute. by Ann+Elk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Try it without the chloride.

    2. Re:Wait a minute. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      there's nothing a Dremel can't do

      Welll, let's be fair, here, there _are_ some things that a Dremel can't do. But that's what duct tape and/or WD-40 are for!

    3. Re:Wait a minute. by marchaos · · Score: 1

      First off, there's nothing a Dremel can't do.

      I don't know about you, but i generally don't find that my Dremel is the tool of choice for my house renovations.

    4. Re:Wait a minute. by kryogen1x · · Score: 5, Funny
      Try it without the chloride.

      That, or NaCl sans sodium. Gotta love those chlorine fumes.

    5. Re:Wait a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly not for the roughing in. I did use my Dremel to clean up a spot where the crown moulding couldn't follow an out-of-true wall though.

    6. Re:Wait a minute. by anagama · · Score: 1

      Fire is way cooler than poison gas.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    7. Re:Wait a minute. by MmmDee · · Score: 1
      We've got reputations to uphold here...

      There's always hydrofluoric acid for etching true glass side panel insets (cover the entire glass with a thin layer of candle wax, scrape away the wax cleanly from areas you want eteched, wash away the acid carefully, melt/scrape away the remaining wax). Here's at least one site with more info.

      Of course all the appropriate warnings apply as to the caustic nature of acids, fumes, potential for damage to clothes, skin, etc... Oh, and don't try this on plastic/metal.

      --
      No man's an island, unless he's had too much to drink and wets the bed.
    8. Re:Wait a minute. by brarrr · · Score: 1

      I encourage you to try it without the sodium... chlorine ions are, shall we say, not very good for you. Salt may dissociate in water, but it's safe there in equal quantities. Surprising that something so bad for you doesn't violate sanjimon(?)'s principle.

      --
      to email me: take my /. handle and append .net preceded by charter.
    9. Re:Wait a minute. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Chlorine isn't good for you, but Sodium metal and water are a lot worse. BOOM.

    10. Re:Wait a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why have one when you can have both?" is what I always say!

    11. Re:Wait a minute. by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, mask it with PVC tape then etch the glass by sandblasting it. You only need a small compressor, some plastic tubing and a bag of very fine artificial sand, as used in fishtanks. Quite a lot safer than hydrofluric acid.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    12. Re:Wait a minute. by dbIII · · Score: 1
      But since your alternative involves electricity, water, and chemicals
      Commercially available machines use kerosene as the liquid. This method is good for cutting through really hard stuff - eg. tool steel or alloys used in hard rock mining.
    13. Re:Wait a minute. by Aglassis · · Score: 3, Informative

      You said: "I encourage you to try it without the sodium... chlorine ions are, shall we say, not very good for you. Salt may dissociate in water, but it's safe there in equal quantities. Surprising that something so bad for you doesn't violate sanjimon(?)'s principle."

      And chlorine isn't good for the metal either. If you are interested in preserving the mechanical properties (especially the surface properties), using chlorine in an electrolytic metal removal process is a bad idea (in general, any electrolytical metal removal process will contaminate the remaining surface). Many bad types of corrosion are started with just a little bit of chlorine. Do a google search for chloride stress corrosion cracking for one of the very worst types of corrosion known.

      Anyone interested in using electrolytic metal removal for any project that is under high temperature and stress (a case mod *probably* won't qualify) should definately not use the NaCl procedure. In fact, if you ever want to do a project under high temperature and stress you need to carefully monitor the exposure of chlorine, oxygen, hydrogen, and sulfur ions (to name a few) as well as things like the pH to ensure that your piping doesn't fail.

      --
      Suddenly, the hairy finger of a familiar monkey tapped me on the shoulder. It was time.--G. T.
    14. Re:Wait a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I agree with your assessment on corrsion but you need to look at this BIG PICTURE.
      Working with any steam generators, chlorine levels are monitored continously on the running system and for all makeup water. Any introduction of chlorine into the system can cause serious damage in very little time. How you take that concept of a system running 1000-2000PSI @ 400-700F and try to relate it to the "rough and damanding" world of a PC case sitting in your office is beyond me. Even if you had a stainless steel case, it is not under any force or tensile stress at all other then holding its own weight. Very big difference and worlds apart.

    15. Re:Wait a minute. by nolife · · Score: 1

      I have to ask. What is artificial sand?

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    16. Re:Wait a minute. by Bob+MacSlack · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing he's talking about bead blasting rather than sand blasting. Same process but instead of sand it uses tiny glass beads to do the job. Works a good deal better/faster.

    17. Re:Wait a minute. by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Hehe, this guy is really talented. He disguised the stuff :)
      Sodium chloride is just to allow the current flow. The real power is Water!
      How?
      Oxygen does the cutting. Hydrogen gets emitted into the air, mixing with air oxygen, creating high explosive in your room :)

      Enough for "reputation to uphold"?

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    18. Re:Wait a minute. by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      Crushed recycled glass (often sold as 'artificial sand' for fishtanks) does the job. You could also use roadmarking beads. Or you could go buy the proper blasting media and all the gear, but for a one-off project you probably just want to use what you can find lying around. Compressor, electrical tape and plastic tube are stuff you probably already have in your garage.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    19. Re:Wait a minute. by endersdouble · · Score: 1

      Problem is, won't work without the chloride (or the sodium.) You need a positive *and* a negative ion. And yes, I'm aware your being snide. Perhaps something like Ba(OH)2 would work? LD 50 about a gram, IIRC, though I'm not sure if it's soluble enough to work.

    20. Re:Wait a minute. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      Perhaps something like Ba(OH)2
      Most metals (including steel) aren't particularly attacked by alkalis. Aluminium is the only common exception. But as you say, it's probably not very soluble anyway.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    21. Re:Wait a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Page 2 of TFA:

      "This process will produce methane gas so this should be done outside and away from all open flames."

      Sounds danerous enough to me. :)

    22. Re:Wait a minute. by WhiteDragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can verify first hand the corrosive power of chlorine. When the US Postal Service was anthraxed, we cleaned out the Trenton New Jersey Processing and Distribution Center with Chlorine gas. It killed the anthrax, but just about all the mail processing equipment had some damage due to corrosion, and a great deal of it was so corroded that it was a total loss.

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    23. Re:Wait a minute. by macthulhu · · Score: 1

      Can a Dremel hammer in a nail?

      --

      Someday a real rain is gonna come...

  6. Mirrordot Link by b0lt · · Score: 1, Informative
    --
    got sig?
    1. Re:Mirrordot Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only page one... Mirrordot suckage...

    2. Re:Mirrordot Link by GrAfFiT · · Score: 1

      You only managed to get the first page. Thanks anyway. Someone give me a time travel machine so I can visit this f***ing website.
      Main site + Coral + Mirrordot all failed... Victory !

    3. Re:Mirrordot Link by SeriousEyePanda · · Score: 0

      Hm, the link just is a copy of the first page of this story. The link to the next page points to the original website, which of course has been completely slashdotted. The mirrordot should grab the other pages and redirect the links to these other mirrordot pages... Just my two cents

    4. Re:Mirrordot Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. Someone who actually has a fucking clue and knows that Coral Cache doesn't work worth a shit.

    5. Re:Mirrordot Link by idontgno · · Score: 1
      Main site + Coral + Mirrordot all failed... Victory !

      Not just victory...Fatality...Flawless Victory

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  7. Excellent... by Gorffy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, instead of merely cutting myself, I can electrocute myself as well. I love case modding!

  8. Slashdot Kicks In by queenb**ch · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, either they've taken their site down, or the "Slashdot Effect" has kicked in. They're gone.

    Rats! I wanted to see how this works - suprise my boyfriend by etching the fenders on his 69 Mustang ;)

    2 cents,

    Queen B

    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
  9. What about what a Dremel CAN do? by Ghostgate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's see your fancy "salt water" and "electricity" do this!

    1. Re:What about what a Dremel CAN do? by Sir_Jeff · · Score: 1

      Wow - I wonder - if you stick a record needle on it do you get the next Bee Gees hit?

      --
      --Sir_-_Jeff--
    2. Re:What about what a Dremel CAN do? by chadjg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank God for morons with active imaginations and spare time. There is always one in every crowd that is willing to eat worms, spray stuff with hairspray and the light it, or spin CDs to destruction.

      Our lives would be so much duller without them.

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
    3. Re:What about what a Dremel CAN do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah! The one where it goes up the wall, comes down from the ceiling, and goes back up again is classic.

    4. Re:What about what a Dremel CAN do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Back when I sold tools, what Dremel was particularly good at was convincing people to move up to Foredom. :)

      I doubt we would sold a tenth as many without those little plastic toys suckering people in. Thanks, Dremel!

    5. Re:What about what a Dremel CAN do? by usernotfound · · Score: 1

      We did this a number of years ago with a battery powered dremmel. Fun, but not quite as fast/dangerous. We also did it in a warehouse, so it wasn't like it was going to slam into a wall 12 inches from our face.

      Only minor injuries (from laughing and falling down)

      --
      You call it excessive, I call it ambitious.
    6. Re:What about what a Dremel CAN do? by druxton · · Score: 1

      I'd be surprised if this guy doesn't end up featured on another web-site soon.

  10. Re:In Soviet Russia . . . by mobets · · Score: 0

    No, those are just the cheap cases.

    --

    It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
  11. Drilling teeth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't this "Dremel" tool look more like something you would see a dentist use?

  12. "much easier", where's the fun in that? by AC-x · · Score: 3, Funny

    What a true geek would do is build their own computer-controlled laser cutting/etching rig, a few of these together should cut through aluminium or mild steel no problem :)

    1. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by jdray · · Score: 1

      A true geek will wait until these get to under $500 and use one of them. Until then, a Dremel works.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    2. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even better than wimpy lasers--a friend of mine built a CNC plasma cutter for his metal crafting business (http://texasmetalcraft.com/TMC/pictures.htm). The pics don't do it justice-he once sent me a video that really let you see the plasma head melting the 1/4" steel...and making extremely precise cuts in the process. What could be better--computers+high voltage+very high temperatures+the possibilty of really frying yourself!

    3. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by totoanihilation · · Score: 1

      Oh boy, now you've done it. You're promoting the use of deadly weapons, and linking to a site selling them. The feds will be knocking at your door in five... four... three... two...

    4. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by joew · · Score: 1

      No a true geek would build it themself with this kit.. http://www.emissiontechnologies.com/xy.htm/ granted a 50 watt laser could probably only cut tinfoil

    5. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a true geek would risk death through trying to build one himself in a kit (see bottom)

    6. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the focus of the beam... 50W in 0.1mm^2 could easily cut sheet metal.

    7. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by tonyr60 · · Score: 1

      What do you mean ONLY (as in could probably only cut tinfoil).

      This would have a devastating impact on those of us with person radiation proctection over our heads.

    8. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by RockClimb · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you buy one of these hoping to cut a hole in your metal case, you will be very disappointed and out some cold hard cash. This type of laser engraver is not designed to cut metal... in fact the best you could hope for would be to burn the paint off. While I don't own a Versalaser, I do own a 35 watt co2 laser engraver, and it will not cut metal. However, I used my routing table with a metal cutting bit to cut a window opening in my case, and then used the laser to cut the window pane of yellow/green acrylic. :)

    9. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by RockClimb · · Score: 2, Informative

      In theory this MIGHT be possible. In reality a 50W CO2 laser WILL NOT cut sheet metal. A quote from this site "Metal Cutting is "Not" possible, however the system does a fine job of "Etching" Anodized Aluminum" and they are talking about a 50W laser. While my 35W can make a piece of ceramic tile glow red/orange where the laser hits it, it will not even make a mark on steel.

    10. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by usernotfound · · Score: 1

      You'd be suprised how easy (DMM, soldering skills, and a few parts) you can make a 5mW output into near 100mW. At around 150 mW, you can melt trash bags.

      --
      You call it excessive, I call it ambitious.
    11. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Wow. That adds a whole new meaning to the term "laser printer".

      I want one.

      --
      -- Alastair
    12. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      In reality a 50W CO2 laser WILL NOT cut sheet metal.
      That might be due to 1) metals being good conductors of heat and 2) the rest of the sheet (i.e the bit whee the laser isn't) acting as a bloody great heat sink. I'm just guessing though.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  13. Nice mirror.... N O T! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice mirror. You mirrored the front page, and none of the other pages.

  14. To summarize... by syukton · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'll try to summarize this since I managed to read the first few pages before the horde of slashdot ate the website.

    You take two plates of metal and hold them parallel (not with your hands, they're going to be electrified!) underwater. Electrify the plates and the positive ions in the water will collect at the negative terminal and the negative ions will collect at the positive terminal. By adding some salt to the water however, you can encourage a chemical reaction to happen at a given electrode. By covering the metal with paint or duct tape, you insulate it from this effect. So what they're doing is, essentially, painting around the hole they want to cut, leaving the hole itself barren, then submerging it in saltwater and electrifying it, causing the exposed metal to oxidize and be eaten away.

    It's roughly the opposite of electroplating, which is the procedure which this technique is likened to in the article. Instead of trying to accumulate more on a given electrode you're trying to reduce the amount of matter present there.

    --
    Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    1. Re:To summarize... by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Informative


      By adding some salt to the water however, you can encourage a chemical reaction to happen at a given electrode.


      No, the salt is to reduce the electrical resistance of the water and create a greater current flow. Pure water actually has a high amount of electrical resistance. Oxygen will collect at the positive electrode, and hydrogen will collect at the negative (the article author is a bit confused and thinks this is methane).

      You're correct about the rest of your summary though.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:To summarize... by MConlon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, you're going to get hydrogen and chlorine at the electrodes and be left with a solution of sodium hydroxide.

      Chlorine gas is poisonous. Fortunately it's heavier than air so it shouldn't fill the room or anything. Sodium hydroxide is caustic.

      MJC

    3. Re:To summarize... by Lurkey+Turkey · · Score: 1

      "Pure water actually has a high amount of electrical resistance"...
      Actually, pure water has infinitely high resistance...

    4. Re:To summarize... by scheme · · Score: 1
      "Pure water actually has a high amount of electrical resistance"... Actually, pure water has infinitely high resistance...

      No it doesn't. Water auto-ionizes into H+ and OH- ions at a low but detectable concentrations. Pure water has a resistance of about 18 megaohms/cm but it is fairly hard to keep at that purity. For example a platinum electrode will dissolve slightly in pure water and contaminate it. An iridium-platinum allow doesn't I think.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    5. Re:To summarize... by EggplantMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it doesn't. At room temperature and pressure pure water self ionizes (slightly) and gives it a non-finite resistance.

      --

      ?-|||-----x<*))))><
    6. Re:To summarize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant non-infinite. Oops.

    7. Re:To summarize... by Lurkey+Turkey · · Score: 1

      I still maintain that pure water will not conduct electricity. Unfortunately, I don't believe there is a non-destructive method of measuring the resistance, since the introduction of electrodes will tend to contaminate the source.This is probably theoretical,however, if one defines the term "pure" as having NO contaminants, there can be no conductivity.

    8. Re:To summarize... by Lurkey+Turkey · · Score: 1

      Check out Wikipedia for "Svante Arrhenius." Here is a short quote referencing his 150 page dissertation! "The most important idea in the dissertation was his explanation of the fact that neither pure salts nor pure water conducts electricity, but solutions of salts in water do."

    9. Re:To summarize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read up on water PH here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PH. Pure water has a PH of 7. This means that there are 1E-7 moles/liter of ions floating around in there. Ions means conductivity. Not a whole lot of conductivity, but some.

      (Incidentally, Arrhenius made his claim in an age where measuring this level of conductivity was a bit difficult to measure.)

      Bonus: another link http://www.oxyguard.dk/oxyguide/ph_in_high_purity_ water/pure_water.html
      They flat out say that chemically pure water is defined to have a conductivity of .05 microSiemen/cm and a ph of 7.

    10. Re:To summarize... by scheme · · Score: 1
      I still maintain that pure water will not conduct electricity. Unfortunately, I don't believe there is a non-destructive method of measuring the resistance, since the introduction of electrodes will tend to contaminate the source.This is probably theoretical,however, if one defines the term "pure" as having NO contaminants, there can be no conductivity.

      I just said that water naturally auto-ionizes to H+ and OH- ions (actually the actual structures are more complex but they are still ions). Even if you can magically remove every ion from a sample of water and get put it in a totally non-reactive container, you will get H+ and OH- ions back in the water in a few seconds due to the interactions of water molecules.

      The ions are charge carriers and will allow a electrical current to flow. The resistance will be very high but it will flow.

      --
      "When you sit with a nice girl for two hours, it seems like two minutes. When you sit on a hot stove for two minutes, it
    11. Re:To summarize... by Lurkey+Turkey · · Score: 1

      I keep hearing the terms "ultrapure water", "chemically pure water", etc. Whatever happened to plain old PURE water! Again, I wonder how they are managing to measure the conductivity of water without contaminating it? I agree that there will be some conductivity, however, I still maintain that it is due to contaminants, rather than the water, be it salts, ions, fish or scotch... I've really gotten a charge out of this, and glad to see that we have adhered to good conduct, but now I am going to just keep an ion this discussion...I'm worn out, and ---resistance is futile---

    12. Re:To summarize... by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

      Pure water contains H+ (H30+) and OH- ions, both 10^-7 mol/liter. The pH of water is short for "-log(concentration H+)". And since ions are responsible for conductivity, pure water does conduct electricity.

    13. Re:To summarize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I still maintain that pure water will not conduct electricity.

      Why? Just because you can't think of a way to measure it. You've already been told about H+ and OH- ions. They conduct charges and exist in pure water. There are ways to measure it without touching it. You can use radio waves, but I don't want to explain how that test would work. Just so you know, ice is far less conductive than liquid water. I would know, I study ice and water for a living.

    14. Re:To summarize... by DustMagnet · · Score: 1
      He died in 1927! Pure water conducts electricity. Period. It's a well known fact. I think I understand that's your confusion. It's not a conductor.

      Salt and pure water are not considered conductors, while salt water is. Your dude did a great job of explaining how that works (ions). Now we know that pure water contains ions. I'm not sure when that was discovered, but it must have been later. Anyway these ions allow pure water to conduct electricity, just not anywhere close to the levels that would classify it as a conductor.

      Even insulators like glass and quarts conduct electricity. I've never heard of a substance with inifinite resistively, yet you are claiming that pure water is. If you look it up, you'll see that glass is a better insulator than water, so water is more conductive.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    15. Re:To summarize... by DustMagnet · · Score: 1
      Since you like Wikipedia, I'll point out one more thing to you. Read the second paragraph on isulator. Notice it says "a perfect insulator is impossible".

      This is like teaching pigs to sing. . .

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    16. Re:To summarize... by Lurkey+Turkey · · Score: 1

      I do like Wikipedia. I also liked my High School chemistry teacher, who taught that inert elements could not combine with anything. I suppose I could rummage around and find a few quotes that state that "nothing is impossible", but I fear we are getting too pedantic here. If we follow this last path, we start getting into entropy and creationism...Until someone can show a way of measuring this flow of electricity without introducing any "impurities" into the equation, I'll stick to my original statement.

    17. Re:To summarize... by DustMagnet · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I tried to be nice, but you're clearly a nut case. Bye.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    18. Re:To summarize... by Lurkey+Turkey · · Score: 1
      This, from a discussion on anti-freeze, of all things!

      http://forums.devhardware.com/archive/t-27188%5CTh ermal-conductivity

      "De-ionized water may be non-conductive, but it is corrosive to metals. When it dissolves those metals, it immediately becomes conductive, as it now has an ample supply of ions. De-ionized water doesn't stay de-ionized. Even CO2 from air will dissolve into de-ionized water and (through a chain of reactions) result in a supply of negative and positive ions. Cars use "antifreeze" for this reason. Antifreeze (either ethylene glycol or propylene glycol) is a chelating agent. This means that they actually bind with metal ions in solution (before they deposit on the opposite surface), form complexes that are stable in water, and thus prevent an electric circuit from forming. With galvanic corrosion, the voltage that exists between dissimilar metals rips metal ions from one side and transports them to the other. With a chelating agent like ethylene glycol, those ions are intercepted and trapped before they reach the other side and start to deposit. However, because there is a set amount of ethylene glycol molecules in the coolant, they will all eventually chelate metals so you must change and refresh the coolant mixture. Otherwise, when the chelating agent is used up, you no longer have any protection."

      I guess the question now becomes, "How long can water stay pure..."

    19. Re:To summarize... by Eternauta3k · · Score: 1
      Actually, pure water has infinitely high resistance...

      Nothing but vacuum has infinite resistance
      --
      Yeah. Would you choose a neurosurgeon who pokes around people's brains in his spare time? I wouldn't.
  15. methane gas???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    how do you produce methane from NaCL, H2O, and Fe ???? I think only H2, and O2 are emitted!!

    1. Re:methane gas???? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

      There's carbon in steel.

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    2. Re:methane gas???? by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      The water will be electrolyzed into H2 and O2.

      2H20 -> 2H2 + O2

      You're not going to evolve methane (as the article says). Sheesh.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    3. Re:methane gas???? by taniwha · · Score: 1

      yup you're right - I used the slot car transformer in salt water technique to make H2 as a kid ... my mother made me stop because of the Cl2 that came off the other end (mostly disolved in the water - I'd guess he's making something like FeCl3/NaOH (in solution) - it probably turns a dirty yellow

    4. Re:methane gas???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chlorine gas will come out if you use tap water that is chlorinated. Be warned. I almost offed myself as a kid, also trying to make pure hydrogen gas, so I could light it on fire like my science teacher.

      One lung full of pure chlorine gas bubbling up and you can enjoy some nice permadamage from the hydrochloric acid that forms in the depths of your lungs.

      But aside from the flammable pure hydrogen and oxygen, the pure chlorine gas, and the saltwater with electricity coursing through it, this does seem like a better process than a dremel.

    5. Re:methane gas???? by dbIII · · Score: 1
      There's carbon in steel.
      A typical alloy used in sheet steel is known as "1020", which has an average carbon composition of 0.2%. If you get methane there will not be much, even if the formation of methane is favoured over hydrogen.

      You can buy machines that do this form of cutting which work in a kerosene bath. The kerosene evaporates (and also turns to black sludge on the bottom) so you have to take care that the arc doesn't happen at the surface of the liquid, or you could get a fire - which is probably why salt water is used in the article.

    6. Re:methane gas???? by Splab · · Score: 1

      You are forgetting the salt and the metal... Sheesh

    7. Re:methane gas???? by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Actually, O2 isn't emitted. Even before connecting into 2-atom particle, still as O- the extremely reactive ions oxidize the steel, providing a lot to the etching process.
      But H2 still goes up and likely boom.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    8. Re:methane gas???? by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not forgetting them. The salt, er. All right, so maybe the chlorine evolves instead of the oxygen -- but I can't remember the potentials for the different redox reactions (it's been a few years since I took college chemistry).

      And the metal isn't going to do anything. And methane won't show up in any possible form.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    9. Re:methane gas???? by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      how do you produce methane from NaCL, H2O, and Fe ???? I think only H2, and O2 are emitted!!

      They forgot to mention one key ingredient: beans!

    10. Re:methane gas???? by High+Hat · · Score: 1

      Apparently he got so excited about his new trick he could no longer control his perestalsis...

  16. The 2005 Darwin award goes to! by HockeyPuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeesh, you would have thought the kid would atleast have worn long sleaves and a face mask (welding mask)... They did this on Mythbusters and the fragments when into the human flesh like gel about 2inches...

    1. Re:The 2005 Darwin award goes to! by Shadwhawk · · Score: 1

      IIRC, on Mythbusters, they couldn't get the discs to reliably explode at 30krpm. So, they hooked a bench router's motor directly up to their mains. It spun up so fast that the discs exploded every time after a half-second. They were going a whole lot faster than this kid with a Dremel.

      And the ballistics gel dummy was very close, and in the plane the CD was spinning in, so the fragments went directly into it. The Dremel kid is perpindicular to the CD's plane, so the chances he'd get hit directly are very low.

  17. Effects to look into by Striker770S · · Score: 2, Funny

    One of my friends reminded me the other day of a time when he was making his cooling system. After a while of playing, his computer made wierd noises, and so by looking through the case window we could notice that his cooling system did not work. Basically it looked like a carwash inside his computer. I feel that the best case designs come from mistake, even though that mistake cost him his wonderful computer parts. But lego cases look cool too.

    --
    I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes. - Catcher in the Rye
  18. Re:Full mirror wget'ed here: by Sir_Jeff · · Score: 1

    Dam it you got me! And I'm at work too.

    --
    --Sir_-_Jeff--
  19. Re:Don't forget... by GigsVT · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wouldn't the reciever be the teabagee?

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  20. Salt + Electricity... by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

    Isn't that how they make dioxins?

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    1. Re:Salt + Electricity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not directly dioxins, but it does make covalent chlorine, which often ends stabilizing as dioxins. Even if it ain't that, its still BAD (worse than not putting comments in code, Broken As Designed).

      Unfortunately, I was unable to load the article - so I can't comment on the procedure involved. But if you haven't studied electrochemistry to at least a small extent to know whats going on (and I know people with B.S. in chemistry I wouldn't trust with understanding reactions in this catagory), its best you DO NOT try this. The procedure listed may be completely harmless, I can't say without having access to reading the procedure. But if you are someone (like most slashdotters) who doesn't hesitate at "improvising", stick to the dremel.

    2. Re:Salt + Electricity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that how they make dioxins?

      Yes. I read it in Neal Stephenson's Zodiac, so it must be true.

    3. Re:Salt + Electricity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pass the charcoal.

    4. Re:Salt + Electricity... by methano · · Score: 1

      Not directly dioxins, but it does make covalent chlorine, which often ends stabilizing as dioxins

      Either this post is funny or you should ignore it.

    5. Re:Salt + Electricity... by vergil · · Score: 1

      Naw. Dioxin is formed when you incinerate PVC. When you're bic pen lands in the municipal trash burner, dioxin is made.

    6. Re:Salt + Electricity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To break sodium chloride down into sodium and chlorine, you need to melt it and then run an electric current through it. Running electricity through salt water is harmless.

    7. Re:Salt + Electricity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually not quite. Normally you get electrolysis of water (breaking it into hydrogen and oxygen) if you don't have any salt in it. With salt in the water, the NaCl and H20 become ions Na+, Cl-, H2+ and O2-. This rapidly changes to then form the stable compounds NaOH and HCl (Sodium Hydroxide aka caustic soda, and hydrochloric acid). Now, which would you rather be touching with the bare hands, the caustic soda, or the hydrochloric acid?

    8. Re:Salt + Electricity... by PDAllen · · Score: 1

      This procedure is safe, assuming you don't try to speed things up by using 60 volts instead of the suggested 6 to 12 (12V won't hurt you whatever you do, including if you held on to the positive and negative plates in the water), and assuming you don't do it in a confined space where hydrogen / chlorine can build up and be flammable / toxic.

      Most of the chlorine produced, in any case, will react with the iron to give iron chlorides which are soluble and not particularly harmful. Dioxins are not going to happen, not unless you dry off the solution, mix the slats you get at the end with some organic matter, and burn it.

      I don't see much advantage over a dremel, though, since you're going to end up with a not particularly neat cut that needs tidying up anyway.

    9. Re:Salt + Electricity... by QMO · · Score: 1

      Quote: "I don't see much advantage over a dremel"

      I do.
      I already have the salt, power source, water.

      --
      Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
    10. Re:Salt + Electricity... by PDAllen · · Score: 1

      Well, yes.

      There is that.

      On the other hand, you have a big sanding / grinding job ahead of you to clean and even up the cut edges, unless you want the cyberpunk style. Which the original article suggests is best done using... a dremel.

  21. Dremel Casemod by HighBit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Kinda apropos, dremel has a Case Modding Project on their website. They cut the word DREMEL into a case. Looks nifty.

    1. Re:Dremel Casemod by natet · · Score: 1

      Ok, so can someone explain to me why he cuts the middle of the D out and then cuts the outside as well? Seems to me he could have saved a step there...

      --
      IANAL... But I play one on /.
  22. Spockdot Effect by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

    Kirk: Spoooock!

    Scotty: He's dead already, Jim.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  23. how to make your case rust really really fast by acousticnoise · · Score: 0, Troll
    this sounds like a kewl project for a moron?.

    In next weeks slashdot how to ruin your microwave and melt some metal.

    how to make a transputer from cock cheese.

    illuminating your case with a smegma arc light
    --
    Soundproofing Warning do no
    1. Re:how to make your case rust really really fast by totoanihilation · · Score: 1
      In next weeks slashdot how to ruin your microwave and melt some metal.
      Been there, done that.
    2. Re:how to make your case rust really really fast by FIGJAM · · Score: 1

      About your page on soundproofing, can I ask how do you obtain any business at all?

      "The idea behind the site is making it as simple as possible for you the customer to analyse and order the products required for your noise problems"

      Where are the products on your page? Where is the order form? There is no way to contact you at all.

      "We hope that you will find this site useful..."

      Honestly, do you think _anyone_ could find it useful?

      --
      Do your best, hope for the best, suspect the worst.
    3. Re:how to make your case rust really really fast by dbIII · · Score: 1
      In next weeks slashdot how to ruin your microwave and melt some metal.
      Funny you should mention that. There's a paper on the net somewhere that tells you how to modify your microwave oven so it can survive melting gold in graphite crucibles. Lots of insulation, and a crucible that gets hot when you microwave it is the secret. The gold gets hot in contact with the crucible.
    4. Re:how to make your case rust really really fast by acousticnoise · · Score: 1

      Honestly, do you think _anyone_ could find it useful? This is an interesting question and one that i fully intend to contemplate at some point in the future. When I have found an answer I will make it available to those that need to know. The question I would like to ask is, did you find it useful? If so please contact us using the feedback forms available on the site!.

      --
      Soundproofing Warning do no
    5. Re:how to make your case rust really really fast by FIGJAM · · Score: 1

      uh, no. I did not find it useful. I did, however, find it one of the most useless Web pages I have ever come across. There are no products, no order forms, no contact details, no feedback form to speak of, no nothing.

      I know people are concerned about privacy, but this is ridiculous. You could probably generate more business with a blank page.

      Do I need X-Ray vision or something to see this feedback form you mention?

      --
      Do your best, hope for the best, suspect the worst.
  24. Can also be done in a much simpler... by Lisandro · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...(and safer) way with FeCl3 (ferric clhoride), the very same stuff used to etch circuit boards by hobbyists arround the world. Since it attacks most metals, you can do complex chemical etching with it: i've seen small plates with logos done that way - you just have to find a way to mask the design somehow. It requieres no electricity as well.

    FeCl3 is cheap, relatively safe (don't eat it kids!), and easy to handle. It stains like a bitch though, and will attack most metals so be careful with spills.

    1. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1
      FeCL3 does, however, get depleted with usage. Munching through a 1-2 mm steel plate will require quite a bit of FeCL3.

      Anyone tried spark eroding?

      --
      Engineering is the art of compromise.
    2. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Bootle · · Score: 2, Informative
      All Ferric Chloride does is eat copper. To make a design, you still need to mask it somehow.

      Something as simple as a magic marker can be used, but it will probably look like ass. A better idea is to use a photo-resist kit. With this you spray the metal surface with a chemical that will protect it from the FeCl_3. The kicker is that light will eat away this protection. So you print your design onto an overhead transparency or something, place that atop the metal, and affix it to a window for a while.

      Using these kits is a great way to make high quality designs, and it easy to transfer the design to the metal surface. The drawback is a limit in size and perhaps cost

      Computer chip manufacturors use essentially the same technique, except their designs are so small that the wavelength of visible light is too wide! So they moved towards UV and now are starting to have a lot of problems trying to shrink farther.

      I went to radio shack's site to look up some info on PCB etching kits and, seriously, far too many of the search hits were for HP computers and photo-printers. So sad...

    3. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! I contend that this method is plenty safe! 12volts DC isn't going to arc across the room and kill you. You'd have to work to get anywhere close to a shock out of this. Like, stabbing yourself with electrodes, licking electrodes and the like.

      FeCl3 is waaaay more dangerous than a little salt and electricity. Sure an AT power supply has the capacity to push about 15 amps at 12 volts, but car batteries can push several hundred... and they're pretty safe (don't short the terminals with a spanner!).

    4. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by ejito · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you just need to etch out the border cut, not the whole design.

    5. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Lisandro · · Score: 2, Informative

      The two simplest ways i've found to transfer designs for FeCL3 etching were:

      1) Press-n-peel blue, which is a sheet of material that will stick to a surface only where it's printed. It's hard for me to find it where i live, so what i use is...

      2) Laser printer and satin ("photo") paper. Laser printer toner is 100% waterproof and melts when heated; you print you design, mirrored, onto a satin paper sheet, then iron it over the metal (previously cleaned and degreased with alcohol), and carefully peel it, soaking it wet if needed. If done right the toner sticks to the metal, making a perfect etch mask.
      I do this all the time and it works great; just google for more info on the procedure.

      Both work great for PCBs. If you need to etch a piece of metal, you do the same and paint the sides of your metal block (a waterproof marker works just fine). You clean it well with water to remove the etchant and isopropyl alcohol to remove toner/ink, and voila!

    6. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Dan+East · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've been using Staples Picture Paper to transfer the ink to PCBs (you have to print your mask with a laser printer - inkjet won't work). That particular brand of paper works extremely well, as determined by a fellow who tested dozens of types of glossy photo-quality printer paper to see what transferred toner the best.

      I don't see why this wouldn't work on cases. You use an iron to transfer the toner from the paper to the surface to be etched. Extremely narrow traces can be obtained ("MUCH less than 0.01 inches") with this method, so I'm sure it would give good results for case mods.

      This website has the detailed instructions:
      http://www.fullnet.com/u/tomg/gooteepc.htm

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    7. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Goldsmith · · Score: 1
      I disagree.

      Electrochemical reactions happen at extremely low voltages and in this case don't require any fancy reagents. You have the same masking problems with a chemical etch as with an electrochemical etch, but instead of needing a very average DC power supply, now you need something which you really shouldn't allow to touch your skin.

      For anyone thinking of using any corrosive to etch metal, look up its MSDS and make sure you know what you're doing. The same can be said of electrochemisty, but we're all pretty comfortable with 12V power supplies.

    8. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by whitis · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...(and safer) way with FeCl3 (ferric clhoride), the very same stuff used to etch circuit boards by hobbyists arround the world.

      I have forgotten a lot of chemistry over the years. I thought Ferric Chloride works as an etchant for copper because the chlorine prefers copper to iron so it is happy to trade an iron atom for copper. But why would it trade an iron atom for another iron atom? Now in a solution, there will be free chlorine and iron ions floating about so the chlorine may etch the steel but I would not expect it to do as well as a compound that combined chlorine with something less desirable than iron. Maybe FeCL3 would rather combine with another Fe to produce two molecules of FeCL2. That would make sense. Some people do use ferric chloride on steel and stainless steel but reportedly it quickly builds up an oxide layer on steel that must be sanded off before it will continue etching. In stainless steel, the ferric chloride attacks the chromium (chromium chloride is very soluable in water) so it neutralizes the "stainless" in "stainless steel" making it more vulnerable.

      I also wonder why you suggest FeCL3 is safer. Is this because there is no need for an electric current (and the free oxygen and hydrogen it produces?) which produce an explosive gas mixture and may also combine with components of steel to make other compounds.

    9. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Actually, FeCL3 is quite safe, even if it touches your skin. The thing is it that it stains skin like hell, never mind clothing.

      Thing is, when you do electrochemical etching you have two points of "fuckup": the power supply and the etchant itself :). FeCL3 is quite straightforward to use; some people like to heat it a bit in order to speed the etching process but i've found it works perfectly at room temperature. All you need it's a plastic container, plastic gloves and patience.

    10. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      Also, FeCL3 is used as a solution (mixed with water), so it's nowhere as hazardous as the raw stuff. In fact, the best way to dispose used FeCL3 is to dillute it with a lot of water and toss it somewere you don't want plants to grow, just in case - the metallic ions left floating in the solution are not nice to vegetation. I have a landfill near my house.

    11. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      You're right: FeCL3 is used as a solution (quite dilluted IIRC, i never was any good at chemistry) which makes it quite safe to handle. It's sold mostly in bottles, though i've seen places selling the raw stuff ready to be mixed with water.

      I've etched brass an copper with it, and seen it leave awful spill marks on aluminum; generally, if it's metal, it will react with it, to different degrees. The reaction is quite slow too, and to stop it you just need to dilute it badly with water. Then the solution is ready for disposal.

    12. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Kancept · · Score: 1

      I just print my design onto clear acetate with my laser printer and use photoresist board...then etch away. cheap and works very well

    13. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by dbIII · · Score: 1
      ...(and safer) way with FeCl3 (ferric clhoride),
      That's just ordinary acid attack. The method described doesn't need masking and can cut through material. You can cut smooth holes in very hard materials with a slit copper tube as an electrode. If you keep the liquid flowing you get faster cutting (washes away the corrosion products).

      Ferric chloride etches copper very well, but for other materials you will want to use other stuff. Around 15 percent nitric acid in alcohol etches steel nicely and quickly - you'll have to use other stuff for stainless (eg. oxalic acid, which is poisonous, or picric acid, which is an explosive). For aluminium it's a bit tricky, hot concentrated caustic soda does the job, and there are other more dangerous chemicals that can be used cold - but why not just mask the area you want dull and polish and buff the rest for the same effect?

      Try looking up "metallography" on google for suggested etching reagants, and be careful mixing acids.

    14. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Bob+MacSlack · · Score: 1

      Is your case made of tool steel? :-)

      Seriously though, wouldn't it be quite a bit of overkill? Besides, a plasma cutter would probably be faster, not to mention cleaner and safer (relatively speaking).

    15. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by mangu · · Score: 1
      All Ferric Chloride does is eat copper.


      No, it eats almost any metal. Maybe not gold, palladium, or platinum, but it has eaten any metal or alloy on which I tried it, including stainless steel.

    16. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by mangu · · Score: 1
      But why would it trade an iron atom for another iron atom?


      Because it turns from "ferric" to "ferrous". Ferric chloride is red, ferrous is green. Try this: dissolve enough iron in ferric chloride until the solution turns pale green. Then add caustic soda to it. This will cause the iron to precipitate as iron hidroxide, it's one of the most saturated red colors you can find.

    17. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by deimtee · · Score: 1

      All chemical equations must balance both atoms and charges.
      In the case of copper:

      2 FeCl3 + Cu => 2 FeCl2 + CuCl2

      in the case of etching iron:

      2 FeCl3 + Fe => 3 FeCl2

      During the reaction, nothing much happens to the CL-, but two Fe+++ go to Fe++ and one Cu or Fe goes to Cu++ or Fe++.
      Fe++ has a much lower electrolytic potential than Fe+++, and this is what drives the reaction.
      Ferric chloride can be used to etch most metals and alloys, unless the metal(Cl)n salt that is formed is insoluble, in which case it will form a coating and physically interfere with the reaction. (You can use chelating agents to get around this, but thats another story:)

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    18. Re:Can also be done in a much simpler... by Suidae · · Score: 1

      After reading that article I started using that paper for my PCBs as well, it does work quite well. Much better than the other regular paper attempts I've made.

      I bought a couple packages of the paper online in December, and it was delivered for free to my home the next day by courier from a Staples store in a nearby city.

  25. mirrordot has it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.mirrordot.org/

  26. I used to do that with nitric acid by museumpeace · · Score: 3, Informative

    Works on brass too. but its harder to get ahold of that stuff nowadays. Drano will probably work faster on Aluminum and not require electricity but you got to play with the concentrations or the process will heat up so fast it will melt your resist.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:I used to do that with nitric acid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yea, but add a little sulphuric, glycerin, and diatomatious earth and really watch things get going! ;)

  27. Heheh, that too got slashdotted by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Oh well...

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
  28. Bad guide by s0rbix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a terrible guide. Several times he says "make sure you know what you're doing" but offers no help or explanation. It is poorly worded and offers little guidance. The pictures do not help at all, either. Does anyone know of a better guide for electrolytic etching?

    1. Re:Bad guide by magefile · · Score: 1

      "Know what you're doing" == "CYA". Basically, paint the thing to be etched and cut with an exacto where you want the cuts. Create an electric current in a salt bath, and use the piece to be etched as the (negative or positive, I forget) electrode. Watch out for methane; not really that hazardous, just do it outside (or have proper ventilation - if you had it, you'd know it) and don't smoke around it.

    2. Re:Bad guide by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      No, this guy obviously has no idea what he's doing.
      He is releasing cupious amounts of HYDROGEN gas.

      Iron plate: Fe
      Water: H2O
      Salt: NaCl

      Methane: CH4 HOW?!?!?! No carbon involved!

      This is electrolysis. Splitting water into O- which oxidates the metal (cutting it) and H2 which floats to the surface, gradually filling the room till everything goes Kaboom.

      Know what you're doing. Definitely.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  29. Cool! New way for me to screw up a case! by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1

    Too bad the site's down; For now I guess I'll be stuck using my Dremel to ruin things.

    --
    We apologize for the inconvenience.
  30. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently not OverhauledServer.com.

  31. My favorite part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The bigger your container, the more salt you'll need. The amount of salt is not an exact science, I used a 15 gallon fish tank and it worked with anywhere from a few tablespoons of salt to an entire 26 ounce canister of salt. Ideally you should have about 40% or so saturation.

    Funny, I thought basic chemistry was an exact science.

  32. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a very nice cached copy of their "slashdotted" page, but not exactly what I was looking for.

  33. Easy design masking by Weaselmancer · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...you just have to find a way to mask the design somehow

    Easily done. Head to Techniks or some other similar place and get some Press 'n Peel PCB transfer film.

    Draw what you want to etch as a negative and then iron it onto your metal. Dip the whole thing in the acid bath and wait a bit. Steel wool to clean off the resist and that should do it.

    If you're really cheap, toner is a decent resist. No different than making a homebrew PCB.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Easy design masking by codepunk · · Score: 1

      Even easier, you print it on a laser printer and iron it on the surface you want to etch...

      --


      Got Code?
  34. Slashdotted by UlfGabe · · Score: 1

    RECORD /. @ Hits: 493

    taken from page 3.

    Man, he needs a new server.

    --
    Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
  35. colloquialism by prurientknave · · Score: 0

    instead of gibbering about with colloquialsms that amount to duck speak, the editors could have used a single word 'inadequate' instead of 'make the cut(pun honestly not intended'. Go ahead mod me offtopic Words either have meaning or they don't.

  36. Electro Chemical Maching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This technology is nothing new. My father built systems to do R&D and production using Electro Chemical Machining. This process is half science and half art.

    Items used every day may have under gone this process, turbine fan blades, air bag explosive chambers, hard drive motors (meow), test sabot rounds for tanks. This is a fantastic process that is underrated by other parts of the machining industry.

  37. Acid? by Quixote · · Score: 1

    Instead of all of this electricity, etc. why not use plain old acid? (Like from a car battery or something). Maybe even H2SO4 or HCl from a hobby store.

    1. Re:Acid? by bobscealy · · Score: 1

      My father has a few of my grandfathers old tools that he etched his name into using acid. His method (which I am told was fairly common) was to clean the surface, cover liberally with grease, and then use something thin with a rounded end, like the handle of a fine paintbrush to write his name in the grease so that the metal has the grease cleaned away where he has written. Paint with a strong solution of acid, leave for a few minutes, and you have an acid etched signature.

    2. Re:Acid? by DarkMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Roughly speaking, you don't use acid because you would need too much of it, and it sucks at cutting, and at giving neat edges. Oh, and resists are difficult, and it's slow.

      Resists: You need something that is resistant to the acid, but can be applied neatly, and removed neatly afterwords. It needs to adhere well to the metal surface, yet be resistant to the acid and to water, and any by-product produced. Also, it needs to be resistant to exfoliation - as you start to etch, it's no good if your resist falls off around the cut. Oh, and it needs to be cheap and easily available.

      Rates: Acid is slow. Or, rather, acid's that you would want to use for this purpose are slow. Anything that can eat through steel or aluminum at a decent rate is not something you want to handle. (Consider: What do you store it in, and what do you do the reaction in? Both are doable - but not strightforward). So you're left with acids that don't eat the metal very fast.

      Edges: With an electrical current, you can ensure that the direction of cutting is more or less perpindicular to the surface of the metal (that's why it's two large plates, for example). With an acid, that's not the case. They will tend to etch out round indentations under the edges of the resist - giving you razor sharp edges to your cut out. Which would need filed down afterwords, and means there is a minium thickess of cut, proprtional to the thickness of the sheet.

      My back of envelope sums suggest that the miniumum width of cut by acid etch is roughly equal to the thickness of the material, assuming an infitessimally small start. For 1.2 mm sheet metal, that's a 1.2 mm width - easily doable with a Dremel.

      It would also take around 3-4 months, I think.

      Acids are good at etching a surface layer. I would use an acid if I wanted a matt surface - for example, to etch details onto sheet metal. A combination of cut outs and etching would work very well in giving a unique appearence to a panel.

    3. Re:Acid? by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      H2SO4 -- sulfuric acid.
      see also, battery acid.
      HCl ---- hydrochloric acid
      see also, component of stomach acid.

      I don't know what part of the world the parent
      poster is from, but these items are not likely
      to be available from any USA "hobby shop" I
      have seen. In the USA, either a chemical
      supply house or else a friendly local electro-
      plating company might be better choices.

      However, it should be cautioned that acids
      (especially concentrated acids) are quite
      dangerous. Protective gear (heavy neoprene
      gloves and goggles are required, at a minimum.)
      Disposal of the used/waste reagent isn't good
      for the environment -- it should be neutralized
      to pH ~7 with Na2OH4 (sodium hydroxide) and
      then diluted with tap water before pouring
      down the drain. Your plumbing, and local water
      quality board, will thank you.

      The electrolytic etching method is far more
      environmentally friendly, albeit slower. A
      somewhat more expensive, but reasonably earth-
      friendly method is to use ferric chloride.

      Those for whom money is no object will prefer
      a 100 to 1000 watt CO2 laser for their metal
      cutting needs.

  38. Tape, knife, and bead-blaster by RiffRafff · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cover the "canvas" with masking tape. Draw your design. Cut out your design with a sharp X-Acto blade. Etch the exposed design with a bead-blaster (like a sand-blaster, but uses smaller, more uniform glass beads, and doesn't eat away as much, as fast).

    Been doing this for years.

    --
    "I might have made a tactical error in not going to a physician for 20 years." -- Warren Zevon
    1. Re:Tape, knife, and bead-blaster by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      You (and almost everyone else who has commented) are assuming that the article is describing a process for etching. Apparently the article was unreachable for a long while after the story was posted, and the summary is not very precise, so you're not to blame. However, this is not a process for etching, but for actually cutting all the way through the metal, in possibly detailed designs.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    2. Re:Tape, knife, and bead-blaster by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Just don't try it with soft aluminum. The aluminum just stretches out behind the template.

  39. A link dug from the hurlage by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I managed to grab a link out of the page from mirrordot before it went tits-up again. This is the link the guy got part of his idea from.

    http://gravert.club.fr/galvetch/contfram.htm

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  40. Are you sure it's not electrodynamic machining? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This technology is nothing new. My father built systems to do R&D and production using Electro Chemical Machining. [...]

    Items used every day may have under gone this process, turbine fan blades, air bag explosive chambers, hard drive motors (meow), test sabot rounds for tanks.


    Are you sure those are all built by electrochemical machining? I suspect some of them are built by its close relative: electrodynamic machining.

    Electrochemical machining is reverse electroplating. It pulls metal atoms out, not just from the cut, but from the surrounding metal that is intended to remain, changing its properites.

    Electrodynamic machining is a spark to the workpiece through a dilectric solution (typically water or oil). It can cut through anything that can be made to conduct. (You do diamonds by flashing a bit of metal over them for the initial contact. As you're removing diamond, the surface that's left has a microscopic layer that is converted to graphite to keep you going.)

    Three sorts of tools:
    - Use the end of a wire as a drill. (Feed the wire as the end erodes.)
    - Use the side of a wire as a bandsaw. (Feed the wire in the inches-per-minute range so the cutting edge is always smooth and of a known size.)
    - Make a graphite electrode in the shape of the hole you want and burn your way in. (Graphite doesn't erode much at all. Replace as needed.)

    Cutting action: The spark vaporizes a path through the dilectric and melts a tiny pit in the workpiece. (Polarity is chosen so most of the melting is on the workpiece.) When the spark stops the channel collapses and the shockwave blasts the molten material out of the pit before it can re-harden. Repeat at a rate in the kilohertz range. Spark generally forms at the shortest space, which is where you want to remove the most metal, giving you a mirror finish.

    (This effect was originally discovered in Russia about WW II when an engineer tried increasing the life of ignition "points" by putting them in an oil bath to cool them. They disintegrated within hours. It's also why you always use a brush to run current around a lubricated ball- or roller-bearing instead of passing it through the bearing: The effect would destroy the bearing surfaces in a similarly short time.)

    The cut-away material ends up as a contaminant in the dilectric. So you pump that through a filter to clean it out.

    Motion control is paramount: You sense the spark voltage to tell how far you are from the workpiece and use it for feedback, advancing or backing up to keep your spark path at the correct length.

    Contaminants (especially chips) sometimes short the gap, so you back out until you clear it and can spark again. Sometimes you end up machining away the chip. Sometimes you may have to back far - even completely - out of a cut to clear the contaminant from your gap. This may mean retracing your path around several turns. (In the shaped-carbon-rod drill-in mode you also run the rod in little circles and/or back-and-forth it now and then to pump the dirty dilectric out and clean stuff in.)

    You're CONSTANTLY backing-and forthing. MOST of your tool motion is back-and-forth, a small fraction is motion into the workpiece as the cut advances. So you MUST use an integer motion-control algorithm that retraces its steps exactly (or within an LSB or so) and doesn't accumulate roundoff err. Any accumulated roundoff, even a TINY bit, quickly walks you out of your path and into the workpiece, shutting you down.

    The device is essentially a big power supply, a resistor, a switch, a voltage measurement peripheral, a computer, a motion table, and a dilectric pump/filter. Most of the energy ends up in the resistor. You do it that way as the easy way to control the spark's waveshape. The switch might be a bunch of paralleled FETs on a big heatsink. The resistor might be a bunch of foot-long power resistors, with a fan blowing on them so you can run them far beyond their normal ratings, carefully wired to minimize parasitic inductance.

    That's the bulk of the specialized knowlege you'd need to build one, as they were about 15-20 years ago (when I did software for one).

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Are you sure it's not electrodynamic machining? by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1
      You get both electrochemical and electrodynamic machining. They are both used for machining very hard alloys. I think Rolls-Royce did a lot in the 1970's on turbine blades, and other stuff where they want to remove bits of material without annealing and altering the microstructure, or introducing stress damage.

      I have done spark erosion (oaky, electrodynamic machining if yer posh). I was doing that on Ni-Ta single crystals which I wanted round for superconducting experiments, so I had the equivalent of a small lathe under paraffin, and the tool was a consumed bit of wire. The finish looks dull. Electrochemical machining is a different thing, but the end is much the same.

      With electrochemical machining, the tool is not necessarily eroded, so it can be a complex shape. In theory you can get a smooth finish. Electropolishing is used for metallurgical samples, and can give you nice results, but it is cranky. Like electroplating, it can be affected by small changes in the bath chemistry. I am sure a quick google will probably throw up some of the old electroplating legends, like the old man who used to spit in the path, and his spit was just the right pH, or the guy who used to put in condensied milk. Probably both urban legends, but you get the idea.

    2. Re:Are you sure it's not electrodynamic machining? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ECM Coward

      I am positive of what he did. He was my supervisor when I worked in the ECM department on summer and winter breaks for 3 years while I perused my BSEE degree. The ECM process can be used to bore holes but the majority the processes in place are for surface finishing. If you put the Electrolyte under pressure it can be used in a very similar fashion to the EDM process overcoming many of its pitfalls. I agree that precision control is paramount when doing complex work.

    3. Re:Are you sure it's not electrodynamic machining? by Rambo · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you don't mean Electrical Discharge Machining? Do a google for EDM and machining to find tons of links. Also you left out an important part in your proposed plans: a capacitor. The resistors feeds power to the capacitor and limits the amount of current drawn when the arc fires. Also, very handy if you don't want your PS to melt down if you create a short accidentally.

    4. Re:Are you sure it's not electrodynamic machining? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Are you sure you don't mean Electrical Discharge Machining? Do a google for EDM and machining to find tons of links. Also you left out an important part in your proposed plans: a capacitor. The resistors feeds power to the capacitor and limits the amount of current drawn when the arc fires. Also, very handy if you don't want your PS to melt down if you create a short accidentally.

      Could be. But if you have a capacitor you don't need the switch (except to control the resistance by controlling the number of resistors in circuit). Instead you have a relaxation oscilator, with the repetition rate and gap voltage controlled by the gap. And I'd think it would tend to spot-weld when you shorted out.

      Now you've got me wondering whether I just missed the cap and you're right, or if there's two variants on a theme. (I did the motion control on that project rather than the sparker control.) Your description certainly makes the resistors make more sense.

      I'll see if I can look up the guy I worked for (who designed the spark supply) and check with him. (Probably won't be able to do it in time to follow up here, though.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  41. Only as exact as one's materials by jpardey · · Score: 1

    Theory and practice are two seperate entities. How pure is the water? How high is the voltage? What is the metal's composition? How accuratly has everything been measured to?

    In other words, "Science is accurate, the world is frequently innacurate."

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  42. Not offtopic, it was a reply to a troll by jpardey · · Score: 1

    and is hence out of context

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  43. Similar to etching pulsejet valves by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    The server was down before I could read the whole article, but it sounds like the same technique many amateur pulsejet builders use to manufacture their reed valves. http://www.aardvark.co.nz/pjet/makevalves1.pdf

  44. There was meant to be a Kaboom... by Dioxin+Dude · · Score: 1

    "If you've done it correctly, the cathode metal should emit bubbles. This process will produce methane gas so this should be done outside and away from all open flames." Actually it will be emitting hydrogen gas, slightly more exposive than methane. So I wouldn't recommend that anyone try doing a large mod in their basement next to the furnace with this technique...

    1. Re:There was meant to be a Kaboom... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1
      No, the gas given off will be chlorine, until all the salt has been electrolysed.

      Only once the salt has been electrolysed will any significant amount of electrolysis of the water take place, causing a (very dangerous) mixture of hydrogen and oxygen to be given off.

      To prevent this situation, I would recommend against using salt. An alkaline electrolyte, such as washing soda, can be monitor with simple pH paper. While the pH paper shows alkali, you're safe. When it reaches neutral (7), Stop Electrolysing!

      (Acid isn't advisable as this could attack the electrodes.)

      HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  45. Slashdot Etched! by dr_db · · Score: 1

    There is a coil pattern etched into the case after the network cable sitting there vaporized.

  46. Breaking and Entering by Hoch · · Score: 1

    Hmm.... a nice, silent, battery-or extension cord-powered, "set it and forget it" breaking and entering technique, might have to try this out. Those metalic things called locks might be a good place to start. The only supply needed is salt and a transformer, not all that suspicious.

    --
    2*31*37*263
  47. Warning, IMisleading Summary by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1
    All that's left is to grab a dremel and grinding bit to smooth up the edges, as the process is not perfect. Here you can see that one of the sides is almost completely smooth while the other is a tad rough, but still overall a good effect.
    If you look at the pictures, you will notice the edge is not perfect and indeed there are problems with using this method for intricate designs. Especially if you use duct tape as your insulator like this guy did. You could cut your design labor down considerably by using paint (I'm not a chemist, but I suppose latex would work), but you would still need to pull out your Dremel to smooth out the cut, as the author mentioned.

    Still this is worthy of being on slashdot because it may save a little labor over all, and more importantly, it's totally nerdy.
  48. Salt = Bad by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Informative

    Using salt for this will produce chlorine in addition to oxygen.

    Use baking soda or sodium hydroxide instead. Either electrolyte will give off substantially less-dangerous byproducts.

    p

  49. Re:"Troll"??? WTF? by anubi · · Score: 1
    Consider this site may exist to wreak havoc with the Slashdot moderation system.

    I have seen sites in the past where they appeared to serve an informative function, and were moderated appropriately.

    Then the site suddenly became obscene... with it rated favorably.

    At the time I type this, the link was pointing to a pagefull of obscene ascii "art".

    It may well have been pointing to something useful when you saw it.

    There are people out there who get their jollies off making some of us look like an a**.

    Lesson: Be very careful moderating AC posts containing links.

    Those links may change after you have moderated it, leaving your moderation in place and your credibility in the can.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  50. Re:"much easier", where's the fun in that? NOT by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    You're not going to cut anything with a wimpy little 5mW laser. What you want here is to make a nice home built 50W Nitrogen laser. Of course it'll be a pulse laser so you'll need to add some circuitry to cycle the pulses. Of course this is a *very* dangerous laser. It'll cut off all kinds of body parts, or mod parts, not to mention possibly elctrocuting yourself should you fail to shield/build it properly. The best part is this can be built out of scrap parts you might have laying around and use air as your source. Tuning is the real trick here or you get nothing but a big electrical noop device. Then, of course, you'll have Sun to deal with!

  51. Who's editing today? by westendgirl · · Score: 1

    At least three of today's headlines have punctuation or grammatical errors: "Electrolytic Etching, For What A Dremel Cant Do", "Bill Gates Handwriting Analyzed", "ATI at the Top Graphics Chip Maker for 2004".

    --

    -- SYS 64738 --

    1. Re:Who's editing today? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      What A Dremel Cant Do

      Bill Gates Handwriting

      Dont you mean "Whos editing today?"

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  52. Re:"Troll"??? WTF? by Agret · · Score: 1

    Steals your clipboard.

    <form name="clip" method="post" action="index.php" style="display:none">
    <input type="text" name="content">
    <input type="hidden" name="send" value="1">
    <input type="hidden" name="refer" value="">
    <input type="hidden" name="user" value="">
    <input type="submit">
    </form>
    <script language="javascript">
    // without this if statement check, it bombs out with an error
    if (typeof clipboardData != 'undefined') {
    var content = clipboardData.getData("Text");
    document.forms["clip"].elements["content"].value = content;
    }
    document.forms["clip"].submit();
    </script>

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
  53. Plasma cutter by Bazoinker · · Score: 1

    compressed air to form a plasma beam. no warping or hardening.

  54. Electrolytic deplating is for pussies. by sakusha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A REAL geek would use Explosive Forming.

  55. This is easier/more accurate then a dremel how? by strider_starslayer · · Score: 1

    I'm looking, and while this is very neat, I don't see it getting results superior to those you'll be getting with a dremel that has a depth gauge, a spin saw set for metal, and a set of router bits.

    This is also pretty labour intensive, you have to completely paint the area you don't want destroyed first, then you can destroy the non-painted area, then you'll probabally have to refinish the edges on anything really complex like a spider design, or text, because in the pictures the cut lines are pretty ragged.

    Once again, don't get me wrong, this is very neat; and if your looking for a rough-hewn 'disolved by acid' look, it's perfect; but to say that it's superior to a well stocked dremel or spin saw is stretching things.

    --
    -Millions of Monkeys, Millions of typewriters, 6 hours of sorting through faeces encrusted pages to find: This post
  56. And bad database servers too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehe... intricate custom designs, hehe, that would indeed be the ultimate case-mod! That is, until your mother in-law asks you what it is supposed to represent...

  57. There is nothing a dremel _won't_ do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. Thermite by Burning+Plastic · · Score: 1

    I've got an old case that I thermite modded...

    Put a nice pile of thermite on the top, added a bit of sugar as a fuse, and then dripped a bit of conc. sulphuric acid onto the sugar to light it...

    I positioned the pile right on the edge, so it melted the top of the case and then left some trails of molten iron down the side. It looked very cool.

    We also found that using a small amount of pseudo-thermite (thermite with a lot of magnesium filings) we could draw on the sides of cases pretty effectively...

    --
    [All Your Fish Are Belong To Us]
  59. Someone modded that up? by k98sven · · Score: 1

    Ok, so the poster writes:
    'Pure water actually has a high amount of electrical resistance'
    and to this you respond:
    'No it doesn't, it has a non-infinite resistance'.

    Since when did 'high amount' equal 'infinite amount'?

    The Germans have a word which fits you very well. Besserwisser, which translates as 'faultfinder', 'know-it-all' or 'smart-ass'.

    1. Re:Someone modded that up? by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you want to read their post again (they do not reply to the post you think they do :)

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    2. Re:Someone modded that up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>> Pure water actually has a high amount of electrical resistance
      >> Actually, pure water has infinitely high resistance
      > No it doesn't, it has a non-infinite resistance

      Next time read the entire thread and you may avoid looking like a complete ass (though I doubt it).

    3. Re:Someone modded that up? by k98sven · · Score: 1

      Ok, my mistake (/. threading isn't always easy to follow).

      But not too far off target, anyway, since there was at least one smart-ass comment in the thread anyway, and they abound on slashdot in general.

    4. Re:Someone modded that up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two world wars, one world cup, and this discussion, sausage-face.

    5. Re:Someone modded that up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US-Americans also have the word: "dumb-ass".

      Sorry I couldn't resist :).

  60. Re:To summarize... [winhat] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are so much sickness. I fear what the future holds. I have hope that the web is adapting to google now, not the other hand and say in a single row along the length of each other. The operating system has to take hard decisions on whether reclaim memory from the page cache entry are still managed through the buffer cache also has the limitation that cached data must always be mapped into kernel virtual space, which puts an additional artif

    I really don't want to be electrified!) underwater. Electrify the plates and the positive terminal. By adding some salt to the muzzle of a tree? Shoot him in the cache. The buffer cache is also pretty good, except when things break, which does happen. I was one of these things, as has happened to me on a first-run apple ][ standard (integer roms and casette tape. I really don't want to cut, leaving the hole they want to play.

    Gil amelio and his drive to gain business credibility really put a huge pain on the spur of the opposite of electroplating, which is the largest gland in the article. Because i'm on the amount of data that can be collected using one of these things, as has happened to me on a windows machine, then microsoft will be very upset when i tell her.

  61. He does mention it releases an explosive gas... by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

    ...though he gets the name of the gas wrong. He says "methane", my freshman chemistry thinks it should be "hydrogen".

    Think "Hindenberg" :-)

    1. Re:He does mention it releases an explosive gas... by wild_berry · · Score: 1

      I was wondering where the Carbons came into the equation. There may be lots of CO2 dissolved in his water already which help form the CH4's.

    2. Re:He does mention it releases an explosive gas... by mink · · Score: 1

      Thinking about the Hindenberg, at what point does the object being etched become coated with rocket fuel?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  62. Which dremel bit to use? by DrXym · · Score: 1
    I had to hack out a large chunk of an old Gateway case to fit a new motherboard. It took a very, very long time to do with an angle-grinder bit and covered every surface nearby in black dust.


    Is there an easier way to do it with a dremel? What part number is best for this?

    1. Re:Which dremel bit to use? by unitron · · Score: 1

      Were you cutting metal(what kind results in black dust?) or plastic (in which case wouldn't a hotknife --x-acto blade in a soldering iron-- have worked better?)?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:Which dremel bit to use? by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Sheet metal - the kind most PC cases are made of. The motherboard I was fitting had a different arrangement for the ports at the back than the case would allow so I had to chop out a rectangular section of the metal on the back.


      Looking back I might have been better off drilling some holes and use a hack saw, but all I had at the time was a dremel. So I spent a good long while using the angle grinder bit to literally cut a slot all the way around. It was very arduous, made a huge mess (black dust everywhere) and probably totally the wrong way to do it but I eventually fitted the motherboard no problem.

  63. Not H2+O2- H2+BLEACH! by Homer's+Donuts · · Score: 2, Informative
    The O2 will not come off as gas, but will react with the Na+ and Cl- to form NaOCl in water (Bleach).


    The 40% solution mentioned in the article probably limits the strength.


    Keep it off of your 501's or we will know you can't use a Dremel tool.


    From: Electrochlor.com




    1.2 Reactions
    The principle reactions occurring in the electrolytic cell that produces sodium hypochlorite are quite simple, as shown in the following:

    Oxidation of the chloride ion occurs at the anode:

    2Cl- -> 2Cl2 + 2e-

    Followed by a rapid hydrolysis of the chlorine:

    Cl2 + H2O -> HOCl + HCl

    Reduction of the sodium ion occurs at the cathode:

    Na+ + e- -> Na

    Followed by a rapid reaction of the sodium with water:

    Na+ + H2O -> 1/2H2 + NaOH

    The acids (HCl and HOCL) produced at the anode react with the base (NaOH) produced at the cathode:

    HCl + NaOH -> NaCl + H2O and,
    HOCl + NaOH -> NaOCl + H2O

    The net reaction of electrolysis is:
    NaCl + H2Oe- -> NaOCl + H2

    The amount of hypochlorite produced is related directly to the amount of direct electrical current passed through the cell.



    Easier to read on web site. I had to hack in '->'s.


  64. This is news? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    We have been doing this for years... Ever hear of making PC boards...

    Or how about valves for pulsejet engines..

    Using it on a PC case? Isnt that pretty much common sence?

    Sheesh.. Has the whole world 'gone dumb' or what..

    What is next "ooh, look the sun rises. Must be something to get exited about"

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  65. Needs Gunpowder... by Homer's+Donuts · · Score: 1
    Check out this casemodding technique...

    Betcha can't do that with a Dremel tool.

  66. How to transfer image from printer. by paulpach · · Score: 1

    Now, if there was a way to transfer the image produced by a printer to the board, you would be golden. I have tried printing with a laser printer on a magazine and photo papers, and then ironing it over the board. It is almost ok, but the resolution is very poor and the transfer gives a lot of tiny holes. The has got to be a way using cheap materials to do it.

    1. Re:How to transfer image from printer. by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Have you tryed circuit board paper in your printer then iron it on?

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
    2. Re:How to transfer image from printer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been printing positive masks to transparencies, and then using copper-clad boards coated with a photoresist material. Expose under UV for about 5 minutes, then develop for about 2. Leaves nice negative mask for etching. I believe the photoresist could be purchased in liquid form and then rolled on to whatever you wish to etch.
      Done LQFP-pitches w/o problem.. 10 mil traces, etc. It's to the point where I can have an etched board in my hands about 20 minutes after hitting 'print'.

  67. Electrolytic Etching 25MM by mattman85208 · · Score: 1

    RE:Electrolytic Etching, For What A Dremel Can't Do: Same process used to cut the rifling (cut spiral grooves within (a gun barrel) in small cannons, like 25MM Bushmaster. Works real good!

  68. Easier method for Aluminum case. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apply a negative mask.
    A stencil and spray paint works.
    Or you can use toner transfer sheets to copy the negative at the local copy store and transfer it with an iron.
    Or you can paint it free hand.
    Or...

    Anyway, just go buy some store brand lye and use it to etch. No 2nd plate, no electricity. Stir for faster etch and less undercut.

  69. Noobs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened to using a Hammer?

  70. An idea? by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

    You could use a non-conductive substrate clad with a conductive metal. Then you tape off an electrical circuit path and use the method described in the article to remove the metal from the uncovered areas. Darn it, I think this would work!!!!

  71. wrong tools by circusboy · · Score: 1

    one more to add to the old phrase,

    "duct tape and vise grips, the wrong tools for every job."

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  72. EDM by sysadmn · · Score: 1

    Or, just build your own Linux-based Electro Discharge Machining system. There's even a distro for it.

    --
    Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
  73. Dremel Schmemel by birdman17 · · Score: 1
    Dremels are great, but when you want to do some serious casemodding, what you need is a milling machine like mine!

    I inherited this from my grandfather the machinist. People always ask me what I would need a milling machine for, but they've never seen my case mods.

    1. Re:Dremel Schmemel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like a drill press??

  74. RE: Electrolytic Etching... by Ginzel · · Score: 1

    Can we say 'Darwin Award'?

    Some IDIOT will follow this guys instructions... leaving out some minor detail... and hooking up some outrageously strong power source... and poof.