Slashdot Mirror


Identity Theft Victim Gets Last Laugh

Ovid writes "Being a bit of a hypocrite, I sometimes whine about privacy in my blog. I do, however, try to be careful about not letting anyone get information about me they shouldn't and I rarely, if ever, use a credit card online. This is why I was surprised to find out one morning that identity thieves had racked up thousands of dollars one two of my credit cards. By early afternoon, I caught them and the police arrested them."

725 comments

  1. Canada by 2.7182 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The canadian mounties have a new branch devoted to identity theft and they solved my case in a week. They are amazing.

    1. Re:Canada by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In America, they'd laugh at you reported it and expected anything more than them simply filing it away on record. It's a lot like if your car is stolen. Just tough shit, as far as they're concerned.

    2. Re:Canada by ChuckSchwab · · Score: 5, Funny

      Similar experience here. Someone ran up $2000 dollars worth of condoms on my credit card. I turned all the information over the Mounties and by the next day they found the guy. I didn't even have to testify because he confessed, so strong was the evidence. I tried to kick him in the balls, but they wouldn't let me. :-(

    3. Re:Canada by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, although toronto has had its fair share of shootings during the past few years.

    4. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, Canada is AGAINST groin kicking?

      Man, I was all set to move there. Crap.

    5. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, your school health centers must be hurting for cash.

    6. Re:Canada by jdwest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Evidently, the CRMP are great at sifting through Mac OS X, too.

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    7. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canadian mounties are great. The Canadians kicked the Germans out of France and never get any credit for it.

    8. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be from the far south, or watch Fox News, because that just makes no sense.

    9. Re:Canada by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 5, Funny


      >>Someone ran up $2000 dollars worth of condoms on my credit card.

      Good god, he must have had a big weekend planned....

    10. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean SHE - it was his mother.

    11. Re:Canada by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      > Someone ran up $2000 dollars worth of condoms on my credit card.

      And that man's name?

      Paris Latsis.

    12. Re:Canada by realbadjuju · · Score: 1

      I agree. My friend's box got owned and some one put up a phishing-scam style site, paypal I think. It was up for maybe an hour before he knew what was going on. A week later he got a call from the mounties. He told them what happened and sent them the logs. And this was maybe 3 years ago...

    13. Re:Canada by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Good god, he must have had a big weekend planned...."

      Heh. At my high school they decided to deal with the teen pregnancy problem by handing out condoms. The water balloon fight was epic.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing how bias can sour ones reading of a story. My take on your link was more along the lines of "Wow, they've only had a single fatal shooting in the past 20 years".

    15. Re:Canada by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing they buy 'em, then return them for cash. If they're bulk boxes they could be $50-$100 each.

    16. Re:Canada by madprof · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Excessive taxes help prevent school shootings?
      Why don't we see anti-gun campaigners making more of this revelation?

    17. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't the resulting water baloons be slippery and slimy?

    18. Re:Canada by LeBlanc_Joey · · Score: 1

      RCMP

      --

      Everything in moderation, even moderation.

      No, especially moderation.

    19. Re:Canada by ect5150 · · Score: 3, Funny


      The water balloon fight was epic

      It must have been as you obviously didn't have any other use for them?

      --
      I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.
    20. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Amazing what can be accomplished by excessive taxs and a fraction of the number of people, isn't it.

      Yeah, that's something... Canada gets universal healthcare, and a police force that actually works FOR the people... And we get two pieces of desert that we'll eventually have to give back.

      Yeah, it's a great deal, ain't it? So much for the so called "conservatives"... The only thing they're interested in conserving is their bank accounts.

    21. Re:Canada by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It must have been as you obviously didn't have any other use for them?"

      Yeah right, as if you should be throwing stones.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    22. Re:Canada by jdwest · · Score: 1

      Thanks. Caught that post-post.
      Bob, Doug (and Geddy) would not be proud.

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    23. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      So did they tell you who you are? (Other than the number 2.7182.)

    24. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Someone ran up $750 of lottery tickets on my card; three people were arrested a year later.. don't know how they caught them, but at least one of them apparently has quite a record.

      Lottery tickets. Sheesh. Criminals are dumb, I guess. They could have actually bought something they'd use...

    25. Re:Canada by Morlark · · Score: 1, Informative

      My excuse is that I'm from Britain, where it's 3am and I've just woken up. Doesn't everyone rush to check /. as soon as they wake up?

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
    26. Re:Canada by kalel666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anyone who's balls can stand up to $2000 worth of condoms is not someone I would attempt to kick there. They'd probably grab your foot and break it off.

      --
      I HAVE CUBIC WISDOM THAT TRANSCENDS AND CONTRADICTS ONE DAY GODS
    27. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story you linked to is 6 years old, have any school shootings happened since then?

      Also it was in Alberta, think of it as a Canadian version of Texas.

    28. Re:Canada by mapmaker · · Score: 4, Funny
      At my high school they decided to deal with the teen pregnancy problem by handing out condoms. The water balloon fight was epic.

      I think I see why your school has a teen pregnancy problem...

    29. Re:Canada by calculi · · Score: 1, Informative

      If by "fair share" you mean about 10% of the number of shootings as Chicago - a similarly-sized metropolis - then you're right.

    30. Re:Canada by Horse+Rotorvator+JAD · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I'm married, what's your excuse?

      My excuse? Well, your wife had the day off work and actually spent the day over at my crib practicing positions out of the Kama Sutra. So I'm too tired to go out and do anything else but post on Slashdot. I bet your little minx of a wife is purring like a kitten right now though. :-)

    31. Re:Canada by multimed · · Score: 1
      I tried to kick him in the balls, but they wouldn't let me. :-(

      Two tries...

      I can't imagine it would have done much good, I mean if he had that many condoms on...
      OR
      Wow he must have wanted some really safe sex.

      --
      Vote Quimby.
    32. Re:Canada by Jorkapp · · Score: 2, Funny

      The phrase "tax on the stupid" seems to fit quite well in that statement.

      --
      Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    33. Re:Canada by uberdave · · Score: 1

      At 3am, I'm thinking about going to sleep, not getting up.

    34. Re:Canada by qube99 · · Score: 1

      $2k in condoms? Even in that worthless Canadian money...I wanna party with that guy!

    35. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada gets universal healthcare

      which you have to wait weeks for. at least in america you can't be refused medical treatment, and you can expect it in a reasonable amount of time.

    36. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the No Homos club.

    37. Re:Canada by darkpixel2k · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't really have anything of value to add to this thread--I just wanted to see if I could get the nested comments scroll off the end of my screen...

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    38. Re:Canada by mp3phish · · Score: 0, Troll

      You can?

      I know several people in the workplace who must make appointments several months in advance just to see their doctor. Sure, the ER is reasonably fast (provided ou aren't in a large city) but then you have to pay tons of out of pocket expenses. And what if it isn't an emergency but it can't wait 2 months? Then your SOL.

      I'm sure the same stories happen all over the world. But you can't justify your beliefs by saying that in the US it is more streamlined. It isn't.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    39. Re:Canada by deltatype0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah, a girl in our AV department did that as a senior prank my sophmore year, she took the air compressor and blew up a couple and tied them to her car and drove around. she had taped them all underneath the seats in the auditorium (the senior class has a class called "Current Issues" that's supposed to simulate college lecture style classes, mandatory for seniors, the class sucked -alot-)

    40. Re:Canada by cot · · Score: 2, Funny

      "It's a lot like if your car is stolen. Just tough shit, as far as they're concerned."

      No way. I had my car stolen in LA, and even though they found it the cop told me that they had detectives working in shifts to find the thieves.

      --

    41. Re:Canada by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 2, Funny

      So what you're saying is, Canadians can't aim very well?

    42. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, yes. What did you expect them to tell you? "We aren't going to do shit about your stupid car"?

      They may be overworked and understaffed, but for the most part, they aren't completely stupid.

    43. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, Donnie. You're out of your element.

    44. Re:Canada by The+Ur-Grue · · Score: 1

      And the obligatory "Big Lebowski" joke sails right over everyone's head, apparently.

      --
      "Dead men are no longer interested in military history." -Field Marshal Friedrich Paulus
    45. Re:Canada by killjoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's not the desert it's the shiny new bombers!. Nothing says "we rock" like massive air power.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    46. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow way to point out 1 event that occured 6 years ago. bet that took a lot of searching

      meanwhile if i want an american shooting i simply have to type www.cnn.com

      moron

    47. Re:Canada by Spruitje · · Score: 1


      In America, they'd laugh at you reported it and expected anything more than them simply filing it away on record. It's a lot like if your car is stolen. Just tough shit, as far as they're concerned.


      Well, in the Netherlands we don't have that much creditcard fraud.
      But we have another problem.
      There are Romanian gangs copying ATM cards and pin-codes.
      Most of the time they are caught.
      Second, the creditcard company's are introducing pin-code on creditcards.
      So if you want to pay you have to type in your pin-code.
      But on the other hand, credit cards aren't very common.
      Most people have bank cards and in most shops, petrol stations, train stations and restaurants you can pay with them.
      No need for cash.

    48. Re:Canada by niittyniemi · · Score: 5, Funny


      My favourite condom story:

      During the war the Russians ran short of condoms and they asked the British government to ship some over on the next convoy.

      Churchill ordered that the London Rubber Company should ship a consignment of extra large condoms over but mark them all as "extra small".

      The story maybe apocryphal but it's well known Winston had a well-developed sense of humour and didn't like Stalin, so I tend to believe it :)

      --
      The Machine stops.
    49. Re:Canada by Lusa · · Score: 1

      You don't happen to know, did they win anything? :D

    50. Re:Canada by l0b0 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I didn't know you had a Slashdot Readers' High over there...

    51. Re:Canada by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    52. Re:Canada by gjhut · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well actually, this type of pin-fraud has been wiped out completely by putting a small tongue like extension on the card input of the ATM. The extension makes it impossible to attach a magnetic card reader in front of the ATM's card entry slot.
      So you can see that some problems can be solved with a very minor design change. You could even argue that the whole problem started because nobody added this (rather obvious) feature to the design in the first place.

      The same can be said about all the pin-pad's (where you enter your number) that are not hidden from view. (Dutch Railways anybody)..

      But then again, the same bankcards can (could?) be used in stores in France without a pincode. So the theft of your bankcard there leaves you always with an empty bankaccount.

      See: http://www.nos.nl/nieuws/artikelen/2005/3/26/pinpa sfraudenederlanduitgeroeid.html , this page is in Dutch.

    53. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly sized? Chicago's population outweighs Toronto's by 1 million people. A difference of 30%.

    54. Re:Canada by flossie · · Score: 1

      A very similar story was mentioned on the Now Show on Radio 4 today. This version had specially manufactured 18 inch condoms (marked as "Made in Britain" and "Medium") used to protect sten guns from the cold. There is a link to the latest episode on the Now Show website.

    55. Re:Canada by zaddikim · · Score: 1

      totally offtopic, but you've got one of the funniest .sigs I've _ever_ seen

      --
      Keen idea man lynches
    56. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How such a comment is modded informative?

    57. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you can get pregnant by participating in a water balloon fight? Oh my god!!

    58. Re:Canada by niittyniemi · · Score: 1


      > A very similar story was mentioned on the Now Show on Radio 4 today.

      It must be synchronicity or something. A couple of hours after posting the parent I listened to the Now Show and heard Barry Cryer relate a similar story as you say.

      I don't know which is true (if either) but I've heard of troops putting condoms over the barrels of their guns (they blow up if fired when the barrel has got crap in it).

      --
      The Machine stops.
    59. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they solve once case every week, like Shaggy and Scooby.

      Was it a guy in rubber mask at the end?

    60. Re:Canada by flossie · · Score: 2, Funny
      A couple of hours after posting the parent I listened to the Now Show and heard Barry Cryer relate a similar story as you say.

      Hmm, I think we need a poll: does Barry Cryer read slashdot?

      Yes

      No

      I'm sorry, I haven't a clue

      Barry Cryer is Cowboy Neal

      I don't know who Barry Cryer is, you insensitive clod!

    61. Re:Canada by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      No Toronto and Chicago seem pretty similar:

      Toronto the city has a population of 2.48 million people, and there are 5 million in the greater Toronto area (cities touching Toronto).http://www.city.toronto.on.ca/toronto_fac ts/diversity.htm

      Chicago has 2.9 million people in the city and 5.4 million in the county.http://www.chipublib.org/004chicago/chifact s.html

      Why do you say Chicago has 1 million more people ?

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    62. Re:Canada by medelliadegray · · Score: 1

      on the history channle, they told how the condoms were used to protect guns.

      If the soldiers got caught, and in their posession were condoms marked 'medium' yet, they were 18 inches long, or whatever--it was supposed to be a propaganda or phychological thing. that and possibly to just conceal the purpose of the condoms.

      --
      Troll, Troll, go away and flame again some other day
    63. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it all comes down to the fact that we can't get guns easily here....not every Tom Dick or Harry has one. Of 100 people I know, maybe 3 have firearms. It's a lot different in the US.

    64. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chicago has 2.9 million people in the city and 5.4 million in the county"

      Ah, but that isn't the "greater Chicago area". That is much larger, and it extends around Lake Michigan all the way from southern Wisconsin all the way into western Indiana. It also extends quite a way out into Illinois past Cook County, probably at least two if not three counties over.

      According to the 2003 Census Bureau estimate, the Chicago Metro area population is around 8.5 million, or approaching double the size of Toronto.

    65. Re:Canada by pnewhook · · Score: 1

      Really? So Chicago the city now encompasses the entire major populated area of Illinois? Wow.

      Well with that logic, Toronto also encompasses the major populated areas of southern Ontario around lake Ontario from Niagara Falls to say Whitby (approximately the same area you specify). This population is probably about 7 million.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
    66. Re:Canada by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      Churchill entered the public restroom in Whitehall one day, saw a member of the Labor Party at a urinal, and went to the urinal on the far side of the room. The Labor MP grinned and said, "a little standoffish today, hmm Winston?" Churchill replied: "It's because every time you see something really big, you try to nationalize it!"

    67. Re:Canada by entrigant · · Score: 1

      They'd probably grab your foot and break it off.

      Did you mean to imply that their balls would do the grabbing and the breaking? O_o

    68. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I had my car stolen in LA, and even though they found it the cop told me that they had detectives working in shifts to find the thieves.

      But did you get your Creedence tapes back??

    69. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every school I went to did that. Nothing strange about it.

  2. Reminds me of another well known scam by kizzbizz · · Score: 5, Funny

    For those who haven't seen it (Like anyone in this crowd wouldnt have seen this), I'd suggest reading the P-P-P-Powerbook Story as a great compliment. These stories of Scammers getting Scammed never get old.

    1. Re:Reminds me of another well known scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Reminds me of another well known scam by volve · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Careful now, messing with scammers could get you whacked. Case-in-point, the final paragraph of the aforementioned P-P-P-Powerbook story:
      3) Finally, and most disturbingly, Jeff was not heard from again. I personally e-mailed him for permission to run his story on ZUG, but after an initial response, I never heard from him again. All of his Web sites have come down, and he is nowhere to be found.

      Jeff, wherever you are, this P-P-P-Powerbook's for you.
      Uh oh! :-/
    3. Re:Reminds me of another well known scam by benzapp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More proof that the only safe vengeance results in the death of the your mark.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    4. Re:Reminds me of another well known scam by LokieLizzy · · Score: 1
      Are you saying that since May 2004, no one's heard a word from Jeff?

      That's just scary.

      --
      My digital rights don't need management.
    5. Re:Reminds me of another well known scam by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Actually the site > www.p-p-p-powerbook.com is back up and running :).

  3. Uh... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


    > and I rarely, if ever, use a credit card online.

    Don't you know whether you do or not?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do or do not, there is no rarely, if ever.

    2. Re:Uh... by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      You do realise that the Yoda reference is in his sig, not his post, don't you? :)

  4. I always say... by LokieLizzy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    never use a card when cash will get the job done. It might sound "cute", but it's the best way to protect your privacy - not to mention your bank account.

    --
    My digital rights don't need management.
    1. Re:I always say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bah. i'm really tired of all this "only use cash" nonsense. this is exactly why you SHOULDN'T use cash. electronic transactions are much easier to trace and when they don't find the assholes you're often compensated in some form by your bank or credit institution. theft is just a part of life. it happens all the time in lots of different ways but when they steal cash you never ever get it back.

      trying to prevent identity theft is like trying stop a plane from crashing. you're just a passenger man and it's way beyond your control.
      just check your accounts regularly.

      i've used my credit and debit cards about every 3 seconds for the last 6 or 7 years. having all of your transactions in electronic form gives you quite some sophistication in using finacial software to analyze your spending.

      in korea only old men use cash.

    2. Re:I always say... by l810c · · Score: 1
      It might sound "cute", but it's the best way to protect your privacy - not to mention your bank account.

      I agree with the privacy, if you really don't want your purchases tracked.

      The key with Credit Cards, though, is to use a Real Credit Card and not a Debit card. Almost all(it may even be a law?) Credit Card fraud, your only responsable for $50. If your Debit Card get stolen, thieves can Drain Your Account and you have no recourse. It's gone.

    3. Re:I always say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      never use a card when cash will get the job done

      are you out of your mind? many, if not most, credit card companied have fraud protection. They have systems monitoring your account activity to detect irregular patterns. They have people call you when there is activity out of the ordinary. And most importantly, if the fraud is detected early, you are not responsible for the damages.

      If you use cash you have none of this service or guarantee. If you use cash and someone scams your cash away, you don't get a cent of it back unless you succeed in prosecuting the scammer and winning a civil suit to get reimbursement. Fat chance.

      I use credit whenever possible because I've made sure that my credit issuers protect me in such cases.

    4. Re:I always say... by soupdevil · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Washington Mutual has completely refunded my money for illegal use of my debit Visa on two separate occasions -- once when my number was used in a different country, and once when my card was physically stolen.

    5. Re:I always say... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Government regulations require debit card issuers to set a maximum liability of $50 if the debit card is reported lost or stolen within two days of discovery. If your card isn't lost or stolen, your liability is $0.

    6. Re:I always say... by l810c · · Score: 1
      Government regulations require debit card issuers to set a maximum liability of $50 if the debit card is reported lost or stolen within two days of discovery. If your card isn't lost or stolen, your liability is $0.

      Please post a link to info about that regulation. As I said in my post, the $50 is for Credit Cards. Some banks are now offering the same protections on Debit Cards as Credit Cards, but it is not law. Here's a link I should have included in my original post. I listen to Clark howard all the time on Radio here in Atlanta and he's is constantly slamming debit Cards.

    7. Re:I always say... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/credit/atmcard .htm "ATM or Debit Card Loss or Fraudulent Transfers (EFTA). Your liability under federal law for unauthorized use of your ATM or debit card depends on how quickly you report the loss." "For example, if you report the loss within two business days after you realize your card is missing, you will not be responsible for more than $50 for unauthorized use."

    8. Re:I always say... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Not true. Give me 100 bucks in cash. I will lose 50 of it with in the first week. I will blow 25 dollars on impulse buys, 10 bucks will be borrowed by a friend and never repayed and the last 15 will fall into the cracks of my couch to be eaten by money gnomes. There is a stigma to making extremely small purchases with CCs, and that seems to be where I spend all of my cash.

    9. Re:I always say... by l810c · · Score: 1
      OK, the best I can tell now is that I have been misinformed.

      It looks like the worst that can happen is that if you don't catch it within 2 days the losses go from $50 to $500. Definately not an account drain. There are other reasons not to use Debit Card as described in the link I provided.

      A point(which slightly got sidetracked by this thread) is that I buy things online with Credit Cards all the time and do not really fear about fraud. You always have that 60 day window.

    10. Re:I always say... by ksaville00 · · Score: 1

      I always try to use paypal when I can

    11. Re:I always say... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "There is a stigma to making extremely small purchases with CCs, and that seems to be where I spend all of my cash."

      It's not a stigma. It's because there are fees levied by the credit card companies. The merchants have to pay a percentage of the purchase plus a base fee to the provider of their merchant account. As purchases get smaller, these fees become a significant percentage of the purchase. Therefore merchants do not want you to use your CC for small purchases for very quantifiable reasons.

      This is also why some small businesses do not accept credit cards. It eats into their profits.

    12. Re:I always say... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      It looks like the worst that can happen is that if you don't catch it within 2 days the losses go from $50 to $500. Definately not an account drain.

      The real problem is that possession is nine points of the law. So if someone drains your account, the onus is on you to get your money back. With a credit card, the onus is on them to collect the money they claim you owe them.

      There's also the problem of the bounced checks if you happen to have some cashed at the same time. And even if the bank does manage to give you back your bounced check fee, the person you're paying with the check very well may not.

      All that said, I still use the paypal debit card for my transactions (just because of the 1.5% cash back they give me). But I don't keep a whole lot in my paypal account, and I don't pay the rent or anything at all by check through the account, so it's really not that bad. Oh yeah, and I don't lose the card in the first place. Yeah, OK, if my wallet gets stolen and used in the time it takes me to report it maybe I'm liable for $50. I'd have to check, but with a lot of cards you aren't even liable for that. $50 is the just maximum (OK, I guess if the thieves knock me unconcious for a week I'm liable for $500, maybe).

    13. Re:I always say... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Haha I'm refering to the stigma of (True story) going into a goodwill and paying for a 60 cent purchase with a CC. You get a very very dirty look. Using CCs for small payments has become not only a business issue but also a social one. What would you think of the guy in front of you if he bought just a pack of gum with a CC. Probably pretty negative. Enter the social stigma.

  5. Nice work! by fegul · · Score: 0

    Great reading! Excellent work there. I might not have been able to restrain myself from slugging the guy though!

    --
    Why bother?
  6. Identity theft protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you just send your full name, birth date, address, social security number, credit card numbers with expiration dates to securemyidentity@gmail.com, we will monitor your credit record and make sure that you never have to worry about your good credit record ever again.

    1. Re:Identity theft protection by Lil-Bondy · · Score: 1

      If This Was Anywhere But /. People Probly Would Send You Their ID & etc. You Never Know How Stupid Some People Are

      --
      Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. - HHGTTG
    2. Re:Identity theft protection by Armadni+General · · Score: 0

      lol

    3. Re:Identity theft protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we mod this down please.. someones going to try it and the real e-mail address is securetyscriptkiddy@gmail.com I know because I run the service. Promise it's 100% secure, not even google will read the info if you send an attached photo of your signature to prove it's you!

    4. Re:Identity theft protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do You Have Any Idea How Hard It Is To Read Text Like This? It Hurts My Fucking Eyes.

    5. Re:Identity theft protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uh, something's wrong with that email address, it just bounces back. Can I post it here?

      Sincerely,
      AOLuser

    6. Re:Identity theft protection by Armadni+General · · Score: 0

      OhWowNobodyCaresThisIsHurtingYourBrainThisMakesItE venWorseYouCan'tReadThisWithoutAHeadacheOrHopefull yTwo

    7. Re:Identity theft protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anywhere BUT /.? You have too much faith.

    8. Re:Identity theft protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i aM oPPOSED tO cAPITALIZING tHE bEGINNING oF eVERY wORD iN a sENTENCE.

    9. Re:Identity theft protection by nsasch · · Score: 1

      Okay, I sent it. You're doing this for free? THANKS!!!!1!!!

      --
      Make your computer faster: rm -rf /mnt/windows/
    10. Re:Identity theft protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you'rE botH wronG

      thiS iS thE correcT methoD

    11. Re:Identity theft protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You insensitive clod!

      The REAL email address is "secureYOURidentity@gmail.com".. trying to fool people, for shame.

    12. Re:Identity theft protection by Ann+Elk · · Score: 1

      And don't forget to include scanned images of your house keys and car keys, just to be Extra Special Safe (tm).

    13. Re:Identity theft protection by hugesmile · · Score: 1
      Here's my social security number: 078-05-1120

  7. Nah, cards++ by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cash can be stolen and used easily. Cards can be stolen and used, but you can get the money back. Big difference.

    Cards are way more convenient, less hassle in the long run, and let you get an accurate tally of what you spend. Cash just means constant trips to the ATM, spending money in dribs and drabs and forgetting about it, and the risk of getting mugged when you flash it too much.

    1. Re:Nah, cards++ by LokieLizzy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      One crucial difference between cards and cash:

      Your purchases aren't monitored and stored in huge server farms God-knows-where when you shop with cash. And that, to me, makes a hell of a difference.

      --
      My digital rights don't need management.
    2. Re:Nah, cards++ by mslinux · · Score: 1

      Google for it... it's proven that consumers pay 33 - 66% more whenever they pay with plastic (that's why McDonald's takes CCs). It's a mental thing. When you're laying down cash, you instantly realize how much less you're gonna come away with and the marketers can't track you.

    3. Re:Nah, cards++ by fred+fleenblat · · Score: 1

      If someone steals my cash it isn't going to screw up my credit rating for the next 3 years.

    4. Re:Nah, cards++ by iowannaski · · Score: 1
      But 99% of McDonald's transactions are cash.

      And they charge the same for CC transactions.

      I don't get it.

      --
      i forget
    5. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Some tips for carrying cash, from a semi-professional gambler who occasionally carries thousands of dollars around:

      • Keep the main stash in one pocket or your wallet, and keep a smaller amount of flash money in another pocket. If you are mugged, you can use the flash money for the tip below.
      • If mugged and asked for your money, take out your cash (or flash money above), and throw it in one direction while you run in the other! 99% of robbers want the money. If you can get the money to spread out when you throw it, so much the better.
      • Life and limb are infinitely more valuable than any amount of money.
    6. Re:Nah, cards++ by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cash can be stolen and used easily. Cards can be stolen and used, but you can get the money back. Big difference.

      Pay by value is much better than pay by reference.
      If you lose cash, you lose the value, but no pointer escapes the transaction. If you pay by reference, you leave a trail of pointers around increasing the risk of someone dereferencing your wallet.

    7. Re:Nah, cards++ by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      You buy more when you're charging, because you don't "feel" it as much. Charging isn't as real as handing over cash. At McDonald's it's probably not much, probably just enough to sometimes tip the scales of indecisiveness about a super size or apple pie or whatever.

    8. Re:Nah, cards++ by hass · · Score: 1

      Actually I have heard that paying your bills on the internet is safer than through the mail. If someone steals your credit card and uses it, you just sign some forms saying that you did not make the charges and the credit card company will reimburse you. I'm not saying that you shouldn't worry about identity theft. Identity theft raises credit card rates for everyone. One other note is that most debit cards are not covered for identity theft. So if someone steals your debit card and uses it, your money is probably gone for good. So it's probably a good idea to use a credit card or a virtual credit card number on the internet.

    9. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay by value is much better than pay by reference.

      That's by far the best geeky statement I've heard this month!

    10. Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Cards are way more convenient

      And in exchange for that convenience you give up any semblence of privacy in your transactions.

      Don't think that just means VISA or MC knows everything you buy because it is bigger than that. There are consumer tracking companies that merchants subscribe to that cross-reference each merchant's sale records with the CC#'s to build profiles of customers that shop at multiple merchants using the service.

      So, you may think the drugstore where you bought condoms doesn't know where you live, but since your home address is on file with, say, Blockbuster, you might just get some junkmail from the drugstore in a few weeks offering you a deal to come down and by some more condoms.

      If you've wife's on the pill, she might have some questions when the mailman visits that day.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    11. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      One other note is that most debit cards are not covered for identity theft.

      If they have a MasterCard/Visa logo on them, YES THEY FUCKING ARE!

    12. Re:Nah, cards++ by mog007 · · Score: 1

      That 33-66% increase in purchases wasn't enough of an incentive for McDonalds to accept cards until a few years ago. Credit Card verification takes time, and McDonalds is in the fast food business.

    13. Re:Nah, cards++ by ceejayoz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You missed the point. People are willing to spend more when they don't see physical money changing hands.

      Seeing $500 in $20 bills, for example, would probably give a lot of people pause when buying a new iPod Photo. Swiping a credit card looks the same whether it's $1.89 at McDonalds or $500 at an Apple store.

    14. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1


      Parent is right.

      For a couple months, I didn't use any plastic in day to day purchases. Kept cash in my wallet and added a few hundred every time it got below 300, so I was walking around with enough for 98% of the day to day purchases I make.

      Pulling cash out for a purchase is much different than plastic. It's brings it home to you that it's real where the plastic is just... well plastic. It didn't take too long to figure out some of the stupid places I was spending by doing this.

      I'm back to using debit and credit cards for most things, but I find it's with a different point of view. - I try to ask myself "would I pay cash for this?" and now sometimes I just don't buy things I might have before...

    15. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You F'ing paranoid! Seriously - who cares what you buy? Get a life! You are an aggregate. No one is specificaly targeting you. Bill isn't sitting in namless corporate x tracking your every move.

      Freakin' A! I'm tired of hearing all of this "but they track you" crap. You aren't that important!

      Unless you are doing something illegal, cheating on your wife, or otherwise doing something that will raise the attention of a higher power there's no reason to not use credit-cards.

    16. Re:Nah, cards++ by greenjello4 · · Score: 1
      One other note is that most debit cards are not covered for identity theft. So if someone steals your debit card and uses it, your money is probably gone for good.

      Most banks will cover fraudulent charges on debit cards if they go through the credit network. However, if your PIN is used, i.e. atm, it does not go through the credit network and is therfore not covered under the policy.

    17. Re:Nah, cards++ by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have to agree. I buy gas with my CC now so I dont have to empty my wallet. I make a concious effort to say "FUCK" when I spend the money just so it does not go by to easily since the price is incredible. Just trying to get the same feel I would when I do empty my wallet..

    18. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you are doing something illegal

      C'mon. Who among us isn't doing something illegal?

    19. Re:Nah, cards++ by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Google for it... it's proven that consumers pay 33 - 66% more whenever they pay with plastic (that's why McDonald's takes CCs).

      In aggregate, maybe. Personally, I pay 1.5% less when I pay with plastic (that's why I use my paypal debit card with 1.5% cash back).

      When you're laying down cash, you instantly realize how much less you're gonna come away with and the marketers can't track you.

      For a few hundred dollars a year, I'll let em track me.

    20. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think it's illegal in most places to offer different prices for different forms of currency.

      Explains why even though places get charged ~3.2% per transaction, they don't charge YOU more.

    21. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Massad Ayoob often carried a $5 bill in a book of matches (the bill and book were folded so that the money was obviously visible). He flipped the book away whenever somebody looked like they wanted to mug him (it flew farther with the matchbook's mass to help).

    22. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      got some Citibank stock, do you?
      How about this: Cards are a 4% unnecessary gouge.
      Cards cost the store owner more.
      Cards companies don't provide good security.
      Giant Corporate Banks are monstors and don't deserve my business.

      Any other reasons?
      Probably a few more.

    23. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spending money in dribs and drabs and forgetting it?

      This is exactly what debit-payment was designed for.

      When you buy several items in a store, with different prices, at different decimals, the way the numbers add up makes a big difference.

      People who walk into a store with a fixed amount of money in their pocket tend to consume more rationally than those who can tap a credit line. The cash buyer is less likely to pick up impulse purchases, and might even go to the trouble of doing the math, in order to avoid embarrassment at not having enough cash to cover their purchases. Whereas, a customer with a card is more likely to pick up an extra candy bar, or tabloid, etc., thus making more profit for the store, and the bank.

    24. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Superb, sir. Superb. In future, I will take efforts to safeguard my bank account against unauthorised dereferencing.

    25. Re:Nah, cards++ by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Quite a few places (especially in the asian computer shops I've been in) charge less for cash purchases than for credit card purchases.

    26. Re:Nah, cards++ by zx75 · · Score: 3, Funny

      One word for you: Gah!

      I've spent the last 3 weeks ~12 hours a day working to complete a project for one of my classes in C++... and when I read your post I thought my subconciousness was leaking...

      --
      This is not a sig.
    27. Re:Nah, cards++ by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Someone managed to duplicate my bank card and pin number and take $1000 from my account. The bank reimbursed my money. Policy is set on an institution by institution basis. If your bank won't reimburse you, then maybe you should shop around.

    28. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless you are doing something illegal, cheating on your wife, or otherwise doing something that will raise the attention of a higher power there's no reason to not use credit-cards.

      Ahh, another proponent of the "If you're not doing anything wrong, then you've got nothing to worry about" crowd. Rush Limbaugh used to stand in your ranks, until some prosecutors wanted to check out his medical records to see if he had in fact been doing something wrong.

      I strongly suspect that like him, your tune will change as well when someone wants to rifle through some of your info that's parked in some database somewhere.

      Savor your anonymity while you've still got some, people. Because it won't last forever. Pay for stuff with cash whenever possible. Don't get one of those toll transponders that could let The Man track where you go. Don't use those supermarket discount cards.

    29. Re:Nah, cards++ by alain94040 · · Score: 1
      Isn't this Slashdot? How come no one offered a technical solution yet?

      Credit cards are not evil. Just issue all of them with PIN, you will cut fraud by 99%. Other countries have been doing this for 20 years or more.

      It still amazes me that credit card companies are willing to let thefts charge thousands of dollars with no security whatsoever. It's called a microchip.

      Alain.

    30. Re:Nah, cards++ by karnal · · Score: 1

      So, you may think the drugstore where you bought condoms doesn't know where you live, but since your home address is on file with, say, Blockbuster, you might just get some junkmail from the drugstore in a few weeks offering you a deal to come down and by some more condoms.

      If you've wife's on the pill, she might have some questions when the mailman visits that day.


      Then the answer is simple. Don't fuck around on your wife.

      Or don't buy condoms. Or try talking with your wife.

      Just because someone knows what I purchased where... you know, it really doesn't matter in the whole scheme of things.

      --
      Karnal
    31. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay backed in gold is by value. In God We Trust is refference. bah... I'm tired and a bit off topic.

    32. Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Then the answer is simple. Don't fuck around on your wife.

      Ever hear of the word, "example?"

      Just because someone knows what I purchased where... you know, it really doesn't matter in the whole scheme of things.

      Yeah, sure, the innocent have nothing to hide.
      Heard that one before.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    33. Re:Nah, cards++ by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Pay backed in gold is by value. In God We Trust is refference.

      U.S. paper money hasn't been backed by gold since 1971. And read this.

    34. Re:Nah, cards++ by manaway · · Score: 1

      Cash can be stolen, but only once.

      ID can be stolen, and your credit card account will be properly credited fairly quickly, but: your bank account will take far longer to get straightened out, and your credit history with the big 3 credit bureaus may never be the same, even after the 2+ years it takes to argue things out.

      In my limited knowledge of friends who have had their ID stolen, there is a very big difference, but it's not what you think.

    35. Re:Nah, cards++ by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I've always had the opposite problem. Virtual money, neat and tidy and accountable for, has always been easier for me to ascribe value to than cash. If it's cash and in your hand, it's expendable. 250 dollars is a lot of money: it will buy you two magic shields, or a blue ring. But 25 pieces of paper? What good is paper going to do you?

    36. Re:Nah, cards++ by xmda · · Score: 1

      Why is that bad? Explain. No, I am not trolling, I simply do not understand the problem.

    37. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're comparing rush, the biggest fucking republican shitbag, to a no-name guy on the internet? the OP did mention something about importance of who you are. get over yourself. go watch some more x-files.

    38. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooh, someone could find out that I drove to my friend's house last weekend, or that I like Mountain Dew, or that I usually buy gas on my way to work. No way I'd want sensitive and useful information like that to fall into the wrong hands... With stuff like that, The Man could... uh... hmm... I'm drawing a blank here... Must be the mind-control rays from their satellites. My hat must be wearing out. I hope I've got enough cash on me for another roll of tin foil; can't let The Man know I'm onto Him by using a card...

    39. Re:Nah, cards++ by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

      What experiment did they do to prove that ?

      Taking my personal example : I generally carry something like 50 EUR in cash, so when I have to pay within 0-25 EUR I will rather give cash, and if it is more expensive use my credit card. So, I do not pay more when I use my card, it's the other way around : I use my card when I have to pay more.

      --
      McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    40. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is you want the mugger to think of *their* life and limb.

      Nothing like a GLOCK 17 to have this effect.

    41. Re:Nah, cards++ by Unordained · · Score: 1

      If you've [sic] wife's on the pill, she might have some questions when the mailman visits that day.

      Uh, I guess you don't believe in using multiple (simultaneous) methods of birth control? Not only because shit happens, but as a natural result of equally sharing effort and responsibility?

    42. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but your bank account balance is signed and it takes a while to run the queue...

      I'm overdrawn again. :P

    43. Re:Nah, cards++ by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      It used to be a CC purchase would cost you extra, it was the merchant passing on what it cost him to accept cc's.
      I was under the impression it was the CC companies that put a stop to this as it was a disincentive to using plastic. Of course they could have done with a few pet congresscritters as well as simply changing thier merchant agreements.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    44. Re:Nah, cards++ by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      The protection from fraudulant usage of a cc (after the first $50 per incedent) that is mandated by law is specifically targetted at credit cards, not checking debit cards or stored value cards. So unless the law has changed you don't automatically get protection on your checking acount debit card.
      Of course if Visa and/or Mastercard have implemented policy to extend such coverage then you get whatever is in the policy.
      However as I understand the cards are issued by banks and other orgs and not directly by MC or Visa, but the structure there is not one I know much about.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    45. Re:Nah, cards++ by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 1

      Even South Africa switched before the 1930-s, despite their gold mines.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    46. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't sell, then GPL.
      If you really want free, then BSD.
      If you want it done right, then buy it.

    47. Re:Nah, cards++ by malkavian · · Score: 1

      People know I'm a geek. So buying my computer parts isn't a problem. Don't care if they monitor that.
      Buying my weekly shopping's not a problem.
      I really don't care that they know what brand of washing powder I buy, or the soaps or food..
      Bills. Everyone has to pay them, and the paper trail there is so obvious, it's not worth obfuscating.
      Now, paying for the half pound or so of semtex or vial of anthrax on the cred card may be just another matter.
      They're useful for most things, but sometimes a cash deal is useful. The trick is in knowing just when to use which item.
      Never use a cred card, and I'll bet someone will take interest in your transactions another way (just why aren't you using one, they'll wonder).
      Use one for everything, and you're easy to track.
      Use one for most things, and it's like the magician's rule. Show them what you want them to see, and they'll never know what's hidden.

    48. Re:Nah, cards++ by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      All we need is an auto_pointer'n'pin.

      auto_pointer'n'pin is comming into world use, which is good for preventing fraud in cardholder present transactions, only problem is cardholder not-present transactions which thanks to the internet have become one of the major sources of credit card fraud. When will I get a auto_pointer'n'pin device for my PC? Something inside me just doesn't think entering my pin into vesa's website is a good idea, least not with the ammount of spoofing which goes on.

    49. Re:Nah, cards++ by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your purchases aren't monitored and stored in huge server farms God-knows-where when you shop with cash. And that, to me, makes a hell of a difference.

      Yes, and "they" have been doing this for years, and what harm has it caused me in all this time? None. What are they going to do, send me an advertisement for something I might want to buy. THE HORROR! How can I refuse to buy something I like?!

      If I am concerned about a purchase being monitored, I'll use cash.

      Or someone else's credit card.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    50. Re:Nah, cards++ by Punk+Walrus · · Score: 1
      Ahh, another proponent of the "If you're not doing anything wrong, then you've got nothing to worry about" crowd. Rush Limbaugh used to stand in your ranks, until some prosecutors wanted to check out his medical records to see if he had in fact been doing something wrong.

      Yes, but he did something illegal, didn't he?

      WTF are you people buying that you don't want traced? Look, I understand the "mistakes happen" ploy used by the paranoid, and I admit, they do happen. Here in DC, we had a SWAT team storm the wrong house last year; they were supposed to storm the house on the other side of the street. But how often does that happen? You take things like Ruby Ridge or Waco, and make it sound like they happen daily, for god's sakes. You only hear about them more now because the media is much more world-wide than it used to be. But that's another topic.

      Say they have some trace program, and see that I got a bag of fertilizer in 2004, and then I got some gopher poison in 2005 and then some matches in 2003, and some pipe and nails in 2005 (I don't know how to make a bomb, if that's not obvious). So the Feds come crashing down my door since I am making pipe bombs or whatever.

      They are going to really have to get some convincing evidence that I made such bombs. If you give me the crap, "What if they plant the evidence," then that's not related to purchase tracing, since they could storm a random house and do the same thing.

      Don't get me wrong, I am for privacy, but people often leave these paranoid comments with no obvious conclusion.

      Tracing purchases is bad because... OMFG! B3n Fr4nkl1n aNd t0m jeferz0n wUd b3 piss0rd!! dont buY sup0rm4rk3t ca4rdz!!11!oneone AAAAAHHHHH

      Now, private corporations are a different matter. Like if they had proof you were denied insurance because you bought too many pizzas and you're obvious a lard-ass... that would suck. Especially if they pegged you wrong because you bought pizzas for your scout troop or whatever. Now THAT would be a legitimate reason for not letting insurance make decisions based on purchase history. But as far as I know, they don't.

      For me to agree with your paranoia, show me evidence. Show me proof of intent to fuck you over as a citizen. But just making comments about supermarket cards with no real conclusion other that some Hitchcock "you'll never compete with fear theat the audience has in their own head" stuff.

    51. Re:Nah, cards++ by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

      The cash transaction does not go into "the books". They do not have to pay tax on the sale. If they are ever audited and it appears that 100 motherboards with P4 chips is not accounted for, they can say that a shelf that was holding collapsed and the hardware was destroyed.

      If they want to make more money, they can even wait until they have a decent amount of cash sales and then claim the stock as stolen, or destroyed.

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
    52. Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You clearly speak as one of the inexperienced, no surprise on slashdot.

      Unless the woman is a biological freak, in which case she has other problems, the pill is 100% effective. That's right 100% - as long as the dosing regimen is stricly followed. All published failure rates for the pill are based on the n out of 100 girls who could not remember to take it each day. Those girls should probably be using something like depo-provera.

      So, when the girl is on the pill, the man's part of "equally sharing effort and responsibility" is to A) remind her to take the pill each day that she needs to, and B) doublecheck with her before each screw.

      Sometimes it also means being the one who gets up out of bed, gets a glass of water and brings her that day's pill so she won't have to do it herself.

      Capiche?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    53. Re:Nah, cards++ by Tingler · · Score: 1

      Unless the woman is a biological freak

      I'm guessing you would learn that after the pregnancy announcement?

      Call me inexperienced if you wish, but I prefer to use as many layers of defense as possible.

      I would love to continue this conversation, but I am going for a weekend drive. I will be wearing a seat belt despite the fact that I also have an air bag.

    54. Re:Nah, cards++ by stanleypane · · Score: 4, Informative

      No offense, but you sound like someone that has never actually been mugged before. And it's no surprise the slashdot community found your misguided words to be insightful.

      I have been mugged. Several times. And if the person mugging you has a gun don't - I repeat, DON'T - do anything sudden. You are not in the movies and you aren't going to be a hero. Any sudden movements could easily scare someone who probably isn't very stable at the moment. And believe me, you don't want to add any stress to that unstable persons life when they have a gun in your back.

      At least, not in my neighborhood.

    55. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'm in the law enforcement field, albiet the private sector where six figure salaries are common. I spend roughly $4,000 to $5,000 a month on my credit-card for eating out, eating out, and fun stuff like personal electronics, motorcycle accessories, etc. Do you think I'd ever carry that much cash? Do you know what would happen if I got stopped on my way to my parents house on a traffic violation in my ML55 AMG and the cop decided to search my car? "Sir, is there a reason you are carrying $2,000 in cash? You are in Oakland. Sir, please turn around and put your hands on the top of your car."

      Yeah, that's right. That's about how it would go down; black man driving a $130,000 MB in Oakland with 2K of cash in his car. As I mentioned, I work in this field. Trust me, my peers and the folks I speak to at conferences have no respect for anyone carrying cash. It's dirty. Your chances of having something bad happen to you from a legal or otherwise perspective is much greater if you carry cash, especialy if you are a minority and make a lot of money. My credit-card gives me anonymitiy when I get stopped by the man. The local threat is always the greatest.

    56. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And before someone says "just get cash at the ATM when you need it and don't carry so much with you." Frequent cashouts from ATM's is a key trigger used to track drug dealers and can be used as court evidence. Take same black man from prior post, keep him in his ML55, say he now has $200 in his car, still gets picked up and now some detective looks into his financial history and see's that he averages 30 ATM transactions a month. The dude's screwed! To his defense, if he kept recipts then there could be a good out.

    57. Re:Nah, cards++ by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Also, sometimes the merchant pays 2% or something of the transaction for card service.

      For some computer stuff, the margins are 5-10%, so 2% is significant.

      --
    58. Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you would learn that after the pregnancy announcement?

      If she has a serious hormone imbalance she will know that she is not normal long before you ever meet her. There is a good chance she'll already be on the pill as a method to correct the hormonal problems and she will have been fully briefed by her doctor on the contraceptive issues as part of that treatment.

      I would love to continue this conversation, but I am going for a weekend drive. I will be wearing a seat belt despite the fact that I also have an air bag.

      Hey, inexperienced AND innumerate too! You'll go far in life!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    59. Re:Nah, cards++ by sysadmn · · Score: 1
      Your purchases aren't monitored and stored in huge server farms God-knows-where when you shop with cash.
      Sure they are. It's just a US Gov't server farm. And we all know how secure those are.
      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    60. Re:Nah, cards++ by Bootsy+Collins · · Score: 2, Insightful
      WTF are you people buying that you don't want traced?

      Donating money to an out-of-power political party? Or to an environmental group, or a group that opposes religious influence on science education in schools? Going to a gay club? Any one of a zillion other things that the dominant political party, or its religious/corporate backers, would rather you not do?

      I don't think that people are afraid of getting spotted doing something illegal. I think a lot of people are concerned over a perceived erosion of rights in the U.S. (cf. the outcry over everything from the USA PATRIOT act to the DMCA). Whatever you may think of that concern -- whether you think worry over declining rights is valid or a load of hooey -- there is bound to be much more worry if you are concerned about it, and simultaneously are looking at a decline in personal privacy.

    61. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!

    62. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it sucks, just recently i had a flat tire and pulled into the most logical place to fix it.. a gas station. said gas station didn't have an air pump and i didn't have my lug wrench in the car so i had to call AAA to come out and change my tire. they were 30 minutes away, so i waited (letting the store clerks know that i was going to be waiting outside for awhile so they don't get paranoid). during this time, a police officer drives by two times. the third time he pulls behind me and turns the spotlight on. he first accuses me of robbing the gas station at knife point, then he said i was trying to steal my own car, then he attempted to confiscate my 17" powerbook! i'm upset now and start demanding to know why he's harassing me. "watch your mouth or you'll have bigger things to worry about". if the tow truck didn't show up at that time, things would have been a lot worse. i was carrying $500 in cash, was no where near my home town at 11pm, didn't have anything but my drivers license on me, driving a $40k car. yea, fuck virginia beach.

      i ended up in the same area last night after i followed some friends to their house. these guys did hard drugs (didn't know until last night) and i drove one of them home. i'm not going to lie, i was freaking scared that i was going to get pulled over for driving my white female friend home and have some crazy shit happen like a cop searching my friend and i and finding drugs.

    63. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cash is convenient enough, and they have to steal it OUT OF YOUR HAND. Cards, they just need a bit of information about you and your card, but no cash can ever be stolen with inforation.

    64. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, she might have been taking some other prescription medication, or have been sicker than she realised the other night, or have eaten a bad kebab and expelled a pill un-dissolved.

      All it takes is a day of antibiotics prescription to make the pill unreliable.

      How do I know the above facts? One lifetime's experience of being female. So there you go, Mister Experience...

    65. Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      All it takes is a day of antibiotics prescription to make the pill unreliable.

      Yep, that's why doctors tell you about the interaction between the antibiotic and the pill when the they write the prescription.

      Ok, you got me, if you live in a country that (stupidly) sells antibiotics over the counter and you don't read the warning label, then you may be in for a surprise.

      Puking up the pill ought to be self-evident, consider getting pregnant in that situation the cost of stupidity.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    66. Re:Nah, cards++ by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Merchant agreements nowadays state that you cannot advertise separate prices for credit customers, to prevent this negative image.

      Most shops, however, will grant you a cash discount if you simply ask (this is allowed)

    67. Re:Nah, cards++ by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      Do you have a citation for this, or do you just think it?

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    68. Re:Nah, cards++ by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      If your wife's on the pill, you probably don't have any reason to buy condoms, unless you're fucking around on your wife, in which case your ass deserves to get caught.

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    69. Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Boy you sure are clever!!

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    70. Re:Nah, cards++ by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      Boy, you sure aren't!

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    71. Re:Nah, cards++ by grrrl · · Score: 1

      Your purchases aren't monitored and stored in huge server farms God-knows-where when you shop with cash. And that, to me, makes a hell of a difference.


      firstly - i use my receipts so *I* can track where I have shopped - gnucash does some pretty graphs :) I seem to spend a lot of money on Tuesdays...

      secondly - they (well, only the bank) know WHERE i've shopped but not what I've bought - only schemes like FLYBUYS (australia) are store-run and track WHAT you buy

      ive never been sent any marketing from the bank so I dont see them collecting data. even if it is being collected... perhaps my spending habits have something to contribute? :P

      thirdly, i prefer to carry next to no cash... it just seems to disspear on random crap - at least with a CC I spend all my money on substantial items and not just drinks and snacks

    72. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "I make a concious effort to say "FUCK" when I spend the money just so it does not go by to easily"

      hey i do that too, except instead of saying "FUCK" when i spend money, i masturbate furiously.

      i think it works better cuz i usually can't spend money for at least another 15 minutes, and i don't need any girlfriend$$es.

      but the cafeteria lady at high school sure gets pissy sometimes.

      (my coworkers in the teacher's lounge are cool with it tho.)

    73. Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm not clever, I'm pedantic. That's why I'm going to spell out just how much of an idiot you are.

      You see, if you are cheating on your wife you don't want her to find out. That's why it's called "cheating."

      So whether you deserve to get caught or not does not matter - if you wanted to get caught you would have just told her in the first place.

      Since you don't want to get caught, you don't want anyone else telling her either. When the drugstore sends a "come back for more condoms" advert to your home, the drugstore is doing something that you don't want them to do, something that most people would not even consider it possible for the drugstore to do because they think the drugstore does not know their mailing address. But because they used their credit card there, the drugstore does know their mailing address.

      Now, for the average reader that was clear in the first message I posted. But for an idiot like yourself, it took a while for you figure it out and then you thought it was your OWN idea so you went and made your dumbass repetitive posting.

      Then, when I called you on it, you responded with the equivalent of, "I know you are, but what am I?"

      I'm fairly certain that even this post is far beyond your mental capacity and you'll just come back with some other response that reveals more about your own mental inadequecies than it says about anything else, despite your sincere belief it is in fact brilliant repartee on your part.

      Good luck, and here's to you having a moment of epiphany!

      PS, see that other post in the thread that uses the word, "example?" That one's for you too.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    74. Re:Nah, cards++ by CondorDes · · Score: 1

      I thought my subconciousness was leaking...

      It probably was. Did you remember to delete your dreams when you were done with them?

      --
      "I haven't lost my mind -- it's just backed up on tape somewhere."
    75. Re:Nah, cards++ by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      This is something privacy laws should deal with.

      In the UK we have the Data Protection Act which provides strict rules on how data can and cannot be used, and this law would prevent this type of information sharing illegal.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    76. Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Ah, you brits have a different use for laws. You see, in the USA laws are written to protect businesses interests, not people interests.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    77. Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I thought my subconciousness was leaking...

      > It probably was. Did you remember to delete your dreams when you were done with them?

      free(your_mind) and your dreams will follow... ;)

    78. Re:Nah, cards++ by Dare+nMc · · Score: 1

      Are you sure of this?
      Every US Bill has a unique serinal number, and these are tracked, to "conteract piracy" any dollar you spend probably goes how? from a ATM (ie bank) to a merchant, who takes all dollars left, back to the bank at the end of the day.
      It would be very easy to track down exactly where/who spent most dollars, and where. And unlike a credit card, which you can be used in your absence, it has to have a physical link from removal by ATM (bank account #, and video survalence) to the scene of your transaction.

    79. Re:Nah, cards++ by woods · · Score: 1

      If mugged and asked for your money, take out your cash (or flash money above), and throw it in one direction while you run in the other! 99% of robbers want the money. If you can get the money to spread out when you throw it, so much the better.


      Why can't they have their cake and eat it too? E.g. shoot you in the back right after you start running, and then stop and pick up the money. It's not as if both you and the money are running in opposite directions and they have to choose between them...
    80. Re:Nah, cards++ by Kombat · · Score: 1

      So, you may think the drugstore where you bought condoms doesn't know where you live, but since your home address is on file with, say, Blockbuster, you might just get some junkmail from the drugstore in a few weeks offering you a deal to come down and by some more condoms.

      Uhm... why would that be a bad thing? I mean, we've already established that I buy condoms, right? Why wouldn't I want coupons to save a few bucks on them?

      I don't understand you people. Why do you vehemently refuse to allow businesses to perform any sort of targetted marketing? Why can't you see that it is a waste of money and effort to send coupons for steak to a vegetarian's house, or coupons for tampons to a single bachelor's apartment? Personally, I would much rather get coupons that I might find remotely useful than the scattergun, random marketing crap that they fling out when they're not allowed to use any demographic info. I'd rather get coupons for pizza and DVD rentals than for flowers or manicures. Wouldn't you? What's the big deal here?

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    81. Re:Nah, cards++ by Kombat · · Score: 1

      Someone managed to duplicate my bank card and pin number

      "PIN Number" is redundant repetition. Ask yourself: "What does the 'N' in 'PIN' stand for?"

      Sorry - pet peeve of mine.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    82. Re:Nah, cards++ by phlinn · · Score: 1

      Not entirely true. If the user stops/starts smoking, then the prescription may not work. Happened to a friend of mind who stopped and didn't realize she needed to get it changed. There are, as someone else indicated, other circumstances that make a pill useless. As a male, I'm not really familiar with the details.

      --
      "Pulling together is the aim of despotism and tyranny! Free men pull in all sorts of directions" -- Havelock Vetinari
    83. Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      If she's smoking she should not be on the pill to begin with, that combination increases her risk of cancer at least a couple of hundred percent, probably more.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    84. Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I mean, we've already established that I buy condoms, right?

      No WE have not already established that you buy condoms, that's the problem.
      YOU have and the store WANTS to, when it is really none of their effing business. Literaly.

      Your argument seems to be that we should give up our privacy to make marketing easier for businesses and to reduce the amount of junk mail we receive? Sorry man, but that is hardly persuasive.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  8. I guess that means his apathy by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    about privacy has come to an end?

    The sheep don't care about the affairs of the shepherders until the wolf gets by...

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:I guess that means his apathy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sheep don't care about the affairs of the shepherders until the wolf gets by...

      Shepherders? Are those people who go around rounding up the shepherds?

  9. Be careful... by LokieLizzy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Shortly afterwards, the police led the two thieves by me. They were in handcuffs and I had the biggest grin on my face."

    You might have outsmarted them this time, but it's never a good idea to gloat. This is something you'll forget in time, but they're going to remember it for a lot longer than you are because they'll be the ones doing time for the crime. If they got really rough sentences because of you and spent several years in the slammer as a result, ten years later they could come looking for you to take away your life. Your credit cards would be the least of your problems.

    --
    My digital rights don't need management.
    1. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If they got really rough sentences because of you... No they are going to do time because they were fucking theives. You can get shot because you cut someone off at a red light. What are we going to do? Cower to theives because they may hurt us? You are pathetic. Way to stand up for what is right, coward.

    2. Re:Be careful... by XorNand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That attitude is rather alarmist. By the same logic, anyone who's ever been a victim of any type of crime should forever being looking over their shoulder. Real life doesn't work the same way as the movies.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    3. Re:Be careful... by LokieLizzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, the irony! A registered member of slashdot being called a coward by someone whose username is...oh.

      --
      My digital rights don't need management.
    4. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      (Score:-1, Pussy)

    5. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like score -1, too much American teevee.

    6. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No they are going to do time because they were
      > fucking theives.

      They will probably waive the theft charges in exchange for a guilty plea on the narcotics possession charges.

    7. Re:Be careful... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And you are forgetting the 2nd ammendment to our constitution.

      And its backed in my case by a state law that says no matter how you get along with the local sheriff, if your record is clean, and you have passed the safe handling checks and have proved on the range in the presence of an licensed instructor that you can shoot reasonably accurately given the capability of the weapon in hand, he must issue a CCW to all who qualify as stated above.

      Like the sign showing the raging dog and the loaded revolver pointed directly at the viewer says, "Never mind the dog, beware of the owner".

      Do I carry? Damn betcha. Any chance of it being used? Only in my own home, or at work alone, and possibly if I should walk into a situation at a local convienience store, but the latter would have to be done under shots already fired circumstances. Otherwise the perp had better be in condition to get up from his face time on the floor and walk to the squad car.

      The bleeding hearts among us all tend to forget that the perp who does this, usually makes a consious choice to take what he wants/needs illegally from those who earned it legally. Generally speaking, society as a whole isn't going to miss those that claim a darwin award for their miss-guided efforts.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
      soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

    8. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, i'm just lazy. like you'd really know who someone really was on an internet message board anyway.

    9. Re:Be careful... by bani · · Score: 1

      few states let you kill someone in order to protect your property. they only let you use lethal force as self defense in the face of lethal force.

      your last paragraph you're justifying lethal force to protect property.

      iirc texas is one state where you can shoot and kill someone to protect property, eg a kid siphoning gas from your car.

    10. Re:Be careful... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      Alright! A voice of reason from the wilderness!
      (BTW, this from a future "Mountaineer" fan.) I
      want you on the jury prosecuting these criminals.

      The basic problem with CC fraud, and with ID
      theft, is enforcement of the law, and then the
      penalties involved. Victims of CC fraud and
      ID theft feel just as violated as a rape victim
      or a burgled homeowner. Lazy police departments,
      even lazier district attornies, and financial
      institutions that consider these to be little
      more than petty crimes, are all at much greater
      fault than even the most dim-witted victim.

      Much tougher penalties, with the DAs and judges
      that are willing to impose them, are the longer
      term solution to these crimes. In the old West,
      horse thieves and cattle rustlers rarely saw
      the inside of a courthouse -- they got swift
      justice at the end of a rope. (Hehe, maybe the
      "old way" is the solution to the GTA/carjacking
      problem we face these days. It wouldn't hurt my
      feelings to bring back some "old time" justice.)

    11. Re:Be careful... by Nick+of+NSTime · · Score: 1

      While you can technically kill someone here in Texas for stealing property, it does not indemnify you from: A) Being arrested (not necessarily charged) B) Being sued You need to be sure you're going to be able to live with the decision of taking someone's life before you do it, regardless of where you live.

    12. Re:Be careful... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thats not worth the cost of the bullet, OR the hassle with both the authorities AND your concience.

      In my home I am king.

      At the 7/11 with a punk holding on the cashier, its a standoff, until he cracks a cap. Then believe me, its the last cap he'll crack. If he's got an IQ over 70, he'll hit the floor face down on my command with his piece thrown or kicked well out of reach. Bet on it. Those are his choices, its up to him which one because the 3rd choice, to swing to cover me will be a bad one. At that point I'm facing deadly force and can respond in kind. And if, because of my age (70), I'm not fast enough, at least I did try.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
      soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

    13. Re:Be careful... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      That's one reason I'm proud of my hick roots, because we have at least one 70-year-old who posts to Slashdot *and* has the guts to defend himself in a life-or-death situation.

      Signed, a fellow West Virginian (born and raised, anyway)

    14. Re:Be careful... by Dmala · · Score: 1

      You may be right, but I can see where that attitude comes from. When I was working at a music store, security guards took down a shoplifter with a duffel bag full of stolen DVDs in my store. He was an enormous, mean looking guy, probably 6'1" 300 lbs, and he did not go quietly.

      I'm quite sure he wouldn't know me from Adam today, but the look he shot us when they marched him past the counter in cuffs still gives me chills.

    15. Re:Be careful... by Skye16 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Victims of CC fraud and ID theft feel just as violated as a rape victim or a burgled homeowner.

      Sorry, but that's them being retarded. Sure, they can feel very violated. Sure, they can feel very uneasy. But to say it's the same as rape is like saying breaking a finger is the same as giving birth. It's not even in the fucking ballpark. Almost nothing is worse than rape. Nothing. Even torture, followed by murder, isn't as bad as rape. It's the most devestating thing you can do to someone, short of maybe raping their family then gutting them with a spoon and hanging them with their own entrails in front of your eyes. I'm sure I could think up a few more fucked up scenarios, but to say identity theft and credit card fraud is the exact same feeling for the victim as rape is completely ridiculous. My apologies for offending you, but rape should never be used in an analogous situation.

    16. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the voice of reason.

    17. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in my own home, or at work alone, and possibly if I should walk into a situation at a local convienience store, but the latter would have to be done under shots already fired circumstances.

      Man, you gun nuts just live and breathe this super-hero fantasy. That's all I ever hear. I hope I don't have to rely on one of you if some shooting really does need to be done - you'd be cumming in your pants to hard to do any actual shooting.

    18. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Perhaps you can can become bunkmates with Earline Martin.

      In some states, when a person claims self-defense they are almost always arrested and charged with murder. Their case typically goes to trial. At trial, the prosecution only needs to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant killed the victim (sic). In order to even claim self-defense, the defendant has to confess, so the prosecution meets its burdon by default.

      The burden of proof then shifts to the defendant to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that their life was in danger and they had satisfied any duty to retreat or avoid the situation. If the defendant fails to meet this burden, the court will convict them.

    19. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Um, yeah.

      And it would have been safer to NOT try to FIND the thieves.

      Better yet, when Discover called to confirm the strange purchases, he should have approved them. (Because stopping the purchase might upset the thieves and, since they have your ID, they might come looking for you.)

      And everytime a terrorist attacks the U.S., the U.S. shouldn't fight back -- right? (Because the terrorists might attack again.)

      You forgot to mention the safest and least expensive option -- deliver a pizza stuffed with rat poison. (Perps won't do it again, cops get to eat their donuts, ID victim goes home with a smile on his face.)

    20. Re:Be careful... by metalhed77 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why do gun owners seemingly fantasize over the scenarios in which they may use their gun. It always sounds almost masturbatory.

      --
      Photos.
    21. Re:Be careful... by dukerobillard · · Score: 1

      Jeez, is that ever true. The testosterone leaking from that post is making me dizzy.

    22. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it "justifies" having an extended penis around the house.

    23. Re:Be careful... by Boogaroo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mark Wilson, a "gun nut super-hero" of your description was credited with saving lives during a courthouse shooting spree. A man, David Hernandez Arroyo Sr., came to the courthouse with bullet proof vest and semi-automatic rifle. He then killed his wife, killed a deputy, and wounded his son. He was closing in to kill his son when Mark Wilson fired on him.

      Wilson has been credited with saving not only the man's son, but others as well. Wilson hit Arroyo several times in the chest, but the bulletproof vest was effective. Arroyo did kill Wilson before running. The gun battle continued about two miles away and Arroyo was killed by police.

      I hear news stories every few weeks of something like this, but almost never hear of anyone able to respond to the situation except police. I know of one friend in Houston, TX who's had to use his gun on a couple of occasions in downtown at night. He's never had to fire. He values his saftey more than the punk who's trying to rob him and rightfully so. If Wilson's a gun nut, we need more like him.

      News

    24. Re:Be careful... by shmlco · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, knowing the scenarios and circumstances under which lethal force may and may not be used is PART of responsible gun ownership...

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    25. Re:Be careful... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not a native, but my wife is. I've only been here about 21 years. Born in D.M. IA, way back then, hung my hat several places "west of the river" over the years.. But I feel plumb at home here, having previously spent a decade in the black hills, but this is anywhere up to 40F warmer which suits my old, beginning to be diabetic bones quite well. I don't know what I'd do if I walked out of the house today, checked the thermometer nailed to the tree in the front yard where it was when I lived just out of Rapid City, and found it telling me that the bite in the air was plumb serious at -39F like it did at 5am one morning there.

      But I did manage to get KOTA-TV on the air on time, one vehicle out of 3 in the yard did start. The other 2 had batteries that had frozen and split wide open. But it was full of reclaimed oil of about 50W, and I drove it the first mile and a half at about 700 rpm listening to dry rod bearings rattle before the oil pump got warm enough to prime itself & give those poor old rod bearings a bit of a cushion. The fact that it started blew me away, this was mid february and it hadn't been moved since deer season ended at the end of november. Once it got oil, it was as good as ever, which wasn't saying much, it was one of fords pushrod 6's from 1952 & never ran on more than 5.5 cylinders since I'd bought it. I guess converting it to 12 volts the previous summer did pay off after all. It got a heart transplant a year later after a mustang and my 57 ford wagon had an argument, and I took the 272 v8 from the wrecked 57 and put it on that pickup, making a pretty good concealed weapon according to one fellow that tried the stop light grand prix against it one day.

      I'll observe one thing about my born and bred neighbors here in WV, they seem to have an excellent supply of something thats not all that common anymore, common sense. That sure beats the heck out of some I met in my various broadcast engineering jobs in California.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
      soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

    26. Re:Be careful... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      No my friend, I don't fantasize over it. The difference is really a good solid understanding of whats right, and whats wrong. Some I suppose, might have bad dreams about it because they hope it never happens but their imagination keeps playing "what if". I sincerely hope it never happens to me. But that doesn't mean I wouldn't do what needs doing if it did happen.

      I look at it this way. Somebody has to do it, and I put my pants on one leg at a time just like the cop who is probably busy scrapeing some drunk off a guard rail at the time. In pieces. With 5 to 20 priors on his still revocked license. His rig punched a van with a family of 5 in it, maybe 2 survivers, so 3 people died and 2 more spent a lot of time in the shop because some judge didn't have the balls to take him off the road by giving him lots of time in the states crossbar hotel to think about it.

      Whats right and whats wrong is something you have to cultivate. Too many think its right as long as they don't get caught.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
      soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

    27. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And everytime a terrorist attacks the U.S., the U.S. shouldn't fight back -- right?

      Ah, you mean how the U.S. responded to two dozen hijackers from Saudi Arabia by bombing two other countries and killing hundreds of thousands of people who had nothing to do with the initial attack?

    28. Re:Be careful... by dasunt · · Score: 4, Funny
      Why do gun owners seemingly fantasize over the scenarios in which they may use their gun. It always sounds almost masturbatory.

      Bunch of freaks.

      Now excuse me, I'm going to play CounterStrike:Source on my brand new Intel 3.73GHz Pentium 4EE Processer with 2MB cache, my 10k rpm Raptor SATA drives (raid 0 for speed), 2 GB of PC4800 memory and ATi FireGL X3 256MB GDDR3 memory!

      I'm going to cream the competition! Nobody will be left alive -- I can't wait!

    29. Re:Be careful... by RedBear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do gun owners seemingly fantasize over the scenarios in which they may use their gun. It always sounds almost masturbatory.

      Why do students study for a test? Why do athletes mentally run through upcoming plays? Why do speakers rehearse their speeches? Why does a guy think about what he might say to the new girl in class? Why does anyone mentally prepare for a tricky or dangerous situation they might encounter? It's something that goes along with being sentient. We think about things. We plan ahead.

      We also live on a planet inhabited by the most dangerous creature in the known universe: Man. We know that bad things happen sometimes. We want to be able to walk into a place and know that we have a good chance of walking out alive. It's the same mental preparation any number of people go through every day. If he was a police officer saying the exact same thing, would you call it a masturbatory fantasy, or a good technique for surviving his shift every day? What, a gun owner is supposed to be mentally unprepared to use his weapon for self defense in a real-world situation? Never think about it and nothing bad will happen, right? Sorry, but this isn't a utopia just yet.

      Oftentimes what you read into something comes from your own mind...

    30. Re:Be careful... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear about the passing of Mark Wilson.

      There is a solution that I subscribe to regarding
      the prevalence of body armor among violent criminals
      these days -- I have yet to see criminals wear
      bullet-proof hats.

      Go to the shooting range at least once a week. Practice
      the Weaver (or modified Weaver stance). Get in the
      habit of using the double-tap (2 shots in rapid
      succession). And practice those head shots. I do.

      If you are fortunate enough to live in an area
      where there is a firing range with shooting
      competition, try to get involved if you can.
      Nothing beats IPSC (International Practical
      Shooting Congress) competition to hone your
      shooting skills. The gun club I was a member
      of had the honor of hosting numerous IPSC
      (pistol, shotgun, and rifle) competitions.

    31. Re:Be careful... by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

      My point was you were overly dramatizing the situation.

      "In my home I am king"

      "At the 7/11 with a punk holding on the cashier, its a standoff, until he cracks a cap."

      How is anyone supposed to take you seriously with such language? Any point you may have had is obliterated by the juvenile language you use.

      --
      Photos.
    32. Re:Be careful... by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

      What the hell is your point? Counter-strike isn't fun because of any immersive qualities; the game is rather cartoonish. It's a fun point and shoot.

      --
      Photos.
    33. Re:Be careful... by metalhed77 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There's a difference between preparation and romanticizing. The post I previously responded to was clearly the work of someone who was fantasizing and over dramatizing.

      Of course, your trite language makes me think that you also inhabit a world with a 'perp' behind every corner and action just around the bend.

      "We also live on a planet inhabited by the most dangerous creature in the known universe: Man."

      Do you know how cheesy that sounds?

      "We want to be able to walk into a place and know that we have a good chance of walking out alive. It's the same mental preparation any number of people go through every day."

      Do you know what divorced from reality you are? A gun will not protect you from 99.9999% of the causes of death in america. I'd say that's a fucking good chance.

      And your whole attempt to say I was projecting is feeble and without any basis. Seriously, you tag it on as one sentence at the very end, with no supporting evidence. How fucking stupid are you?

      --
      Photos.
    34. Re:Be careful... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      You are, of course, quite correct.

      I subscribe to the opinion best expressed by:
      "I would rather be tried by 12 (jury)
      than be carried by 6 (pall bearers)".

      Protecting mere property by means of lethal
      force is never a good idea. The destinction
      between when a crisis crosses the line from
      "protection of property" and "self-defense"
      can get pretty damn hazy these days. Far too
      many car-jackings result in the death of the
      owner, regardless of willingly giving up the
      vehicle. Even purse-snatching victims have
      the (albeit small) probability of getting
      shot or stabbed in the process of giving up
      her purse. And in the good old days, most
      fights involved fisticuffs, not knives and
      guns. A sad statement upon the times in which
      we now live (and die).

    35. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "How fucking stupid are you?"

      He is considerably less stupid than you are, you fucking dolt.

      For the sake of humanity I hope someone removes you from the gene pool.
    36. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, no DDR2? You poser!

    37. Re:Be careful... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Just useing language he will understand is all.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
      soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

    38. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most gun owners don't "fantasize" about it, they prepare for it.

      The overwhelming majority of gun owners would be perfectly happy if they were never put in a position of having to shoot anybody. And not uncoincidentally, the overwhelming majority never are: well over 90% of armed confrontations end without a shot being fired, and usually someone running away.

      That being said, there are those very rare occasions when push comes to shove. IF a gunfight comes to you, and you don't have a gun, you will lose.

    39. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the adage that you are looking for is this:

      "Revenge is a dish best served cold."

    40. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, you mean how the U.S. responded to two dozen hijackers from Saudi Arabia by bombing two other countries and killing hundreds of thousands of people who had nothing to do with the initial attack?

      That was an incredibly tame response. If I had my druthers we'd have responded at night and anyone too close who happened to be looking in the wrong direction might have been blinded.

    41. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy with the hyperbole hun -- suggesting that rape is comparable to *torture* and _death_ is doing nothing for your otherwise valid post.

    42. Re:Be careful... by JoeCommodore · · Score: 1
      ...but they're going to remember it for a lot longer than you are because they'll be the ones doing time for the crime. If they got really rough sentences because of you and spent several years in the slammer as a result, ten years later they could come looking for you to take away your life. Your credit cards would be the least of your problems.

      Wow, that's pretty good FUD, you work for Microsoft?

      This is how monopolies are made, elections won, and people get away with with such things. Yep, don't do a thing and cower under your desks... like everyone else (thats what they want to to believe).

      --
      "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    43. Re:Be careful... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I was just pointing out that the victim is saddled with intense psychological trauma, that's all. Point well taken, though. How silly of me to say "rape isn't like anything!", and then try to come up with something "similar" (and I use that term loosely). My bad :]

    44. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy with the hyperbole hun -- suggesting that rape is comparable to *torture* and _death_ is doing nothing for your otherwise valid post.

      Hell yeah...and what's sad is that this isn't the first time I've heard that viewpoint. What I've learned is that if you ever find someone who is offended by the statement "murder is worse than rape", just walk away. If the truth of that statement doesn't hit them like a sack of bricks, then you can't have a rational argument with that person. They are convinced that you undervalue the trauma of being raped, and absolutely nothing will change their mind...

    45. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but that's them being retarded. Sure, they can feel very violated. Sure, they can feel very uneasy. But to say it's the same as rape is like saying breaking a finger is the same as giving birth. It's not even in the fucking ballpark. Almost nothing is worse than rape. Nothing. Even torture, followed by murder, isn't as bad as rape. It's the most devestating thing you can do to someone, short of maybe raping their family then gutting them with a spoon and hanging them with their own entrails in front of your eyes. I'm sure I could think up a few more fucked up scenarios, but to say identity theft and credit card fraud is the exact same feeling for the victim as rape is completely ridiculous. My apologies for offending you, but rape should never be used in an analogous situation.

      True story (although no one will believe it): After selling a small company for $$$ in the Silicon Valley and getting into a fight with management a few years ago, I walked away with big $$$ (because they were assholes) but I think I disrespected them on the way out. So far as I can tell, they decided to punish me for it.

      A year passes, and; I discover that the woman I had been with was involved with Organized crime, that I had been systematically manipulated and separated from friends and relatives and then extreme mental torture ensued. I was systematically drugged, poisoned (non-life threatening, physically damaging only), abused, hospitalized, my property in two homes was violated (people going in destroying things and partying in my places), my computers were broken into, passwords stolen, account access taken away, credit-cards used, threatened with extortion and blackmail, I was played back recordings taken during the previous year and made to understand in subtle ways who is responsible. It is difficult to even talk about everything that happened, because it sounds so unbelievable.

      I took off (ran out of the country) to try to get away. My passport was ripped up at an airline ticket counter. I was threatened with dozens of setups, including several by a U.S. customs officer.

      This crap went on for two years. They were trying to (A) run me out of money and (B) make me go insane. The ultimate goal was to make me destroy myself while torturing me. I am uncertain if it will continue now, it has been silent for a couple of months now. They were mostly succesful in destroying my bank and I am probably clincally depressed now, but not insane (somehow).

      But let me tell you, I would MUCH rather have one night with big bubba than 3 years of this shit. There are worse things than rape. Would you prefer to have your body raped, or your entire existance repeatedly raped over a several year period?

      For those innocents among you: Where power and money meet, so does corruption and often, very evil people. The world is not a fair place.

    46. Re:Be careful... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      You can say that rape is worse than murder but that's a bunch of bullshit since people recover from being raped but nobody has ever recovered from being murdered. When you're dead, you're dead.

      Torture followed by murder is also worse than rape. In fact, torture could involve rape, so that was an even more ridiculous statement than it at first appears. More importantly, rape is not somehow magically worse than any other kind of physical and emotional abuse just because it involves the genitals. I'd rather be anally raped than stabbed in the kidneys twenty times, forced to make a choice between the two.

      You are quite correct that the statement you are attempting to rebut is ridiculous. Barring an unhealthy addiction to money, Identity theft is no worse than someone wearing your underwear. It leaves you feeling violated but you haven't been injured and you will recover. However, saying that murder is worse than rape is just dumb. Line up ten rape victims, and ten murder victims, and ask them their opinions before you say that.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    47. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      his attitude wasn't alarmist, nor did he even say to not enjoy it - just not to gloat about it in front of them. assuming they'd get jail time (which they probably didn't), sitting in jail being haunted by the gloating shit eating grin of the guy who put you there eats at you day after day.
      never piss off sociopaths or the mentally unstable.

    48. Re:Be careful... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      My mother shot herself a year after being raped. Obviously death was preferable to her than dealing with being raped...

    49. Re:Be careful... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm genuinely sorry to hear that but I think a big part of the problem that some people seem to have getting on with their lives after something like that is tied in with our attitudes about sex and rape as a culture. I can only speak for American culture at all, but I suspect it's not much different in most of the world. A lot of women are treated like a> they did something wrong and b> that there is something wrong with them if they are raped.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    50. Re:Be careful... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I think it was more the fact that she couldn't ever forget it happened. It was with her seemingly every waking moment, and even worse when she slept. It just replayed over and over in her mind and she couldn't escape it no matter how hard she tried. It wasn't how she was treated socially (the guy broke into her house at night - it's not like she was dressed in a mini skirt being a cocktease or something (and I'm not saying that if she was, it would be okay for others to blame it on her, just that it was easy for people to completely accept that she was the victim)). Suicide after rape is fairly common - more so than suicide for no other reason. There are some people who can't put it behind them and just flat out think that it's better to be nothing than it is to be alive and living like that. That's why I say it's worse than death - at least with death, you're dead. That's it. It's over. You don't feel another thing. You especially don't feel the pain. You lose any chance of happiness as well, which is horrible, but what is worse - losing every chance of happiness AND pain, or just losing every chance of happiness and only getting to look forward to a life of pain? (I've been using the phrase "giving up any chance" alot - what I mean by that is a realistic probability of _whatever_)

      That's just the way I see it. Death is definitely not an acceptable occurence, but in comparison to some things, I - and many others besides me - would prefer it to the emotional trauma that comes with rape. I'm not happy mom did what she did, but I can understand it. It's rough at times, but she did what she felt she had to do to get away from the experience. I wish I could have done more to help her so that she didn't feel the need, but there's nothing I can do about that now.

    51. Re:Be careful... by Kombat · · Score: 1

      At the 7/11 with a punk holding on the cashier, its a standoff, until he cracks a cap. Then believe me, its the last cap he'll crack. If he's got an IQ over 70, he'll hit the floor face down on my command with his piece thrown or kicked well out of reach. Bet on it. Those are his choices, its up to him which one because the 3rd choice, to swing to cover me will be a bad one

      Wow, you're a real badass, aren't you. You sure talk big. Some questions though: What if he shoots you before you can get a shot off? Or what if your gun jams as you try to shoot him, and then he kills you? What if he has a partner you didn't notice? Or what if your first shot misses? Could never happen, right? You're the toughest mofo in the world, every bullet is dead-on, you can lift 1000 pounds and sprint 100 miles. Dream on, tough guy.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    52. Re:Be careful... by Kombat · · Score: 1

      We also live on a planet inhabited by the most dangerous creature in the known universe: Man. We know that bad things happen sometimes. We want to be able to walk into a place and know that we have a good chance of walking out alive.

      Don't you ever wish you lived in a place where you didn't fear for your life every time you left your home?

      Such places do exist, you know. And the US isn't one of them. It used to be, but it was in the media's best interest to work everyone up into a terrified frenzy of perpetual fear. Keep everyone locked in their homes, staring at CNN, waiting for the "all-clear" to let them know when it's safe to run to the store and grab some much-needed groceries before coccooning back up in their gated communities and locked doors and screened phones.

      Guns are a security blanket for the brainwashed masses. Fear is a form of control, and the US public has fallen for it en masse, hook line and sinker. The world doesn't envy you; they pity you.

      Here's a shocking scenario for you. My wife and I often go for walks through our neighborhood. AT NIGHT. UNARMED! Yup, we're crazy all right. "Danger" is our middle name.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    53. Re:Be careful... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You lose any chance of happiness as well, which is horrible, but what is worse - losing every chance of happiness AND pain, or just losing every chance of happiness and only getting to look forward to a life of pain?

      The very mindset that it will never get better is what leads to the suicidal behavior. Believing that rape is the worst thing that can happen to you and that it makes you less of a person leads to dwelling on it endlessly. Also, people need help to recover from that kind of thing and different people need different kinds of help. There may very well have been nothing you could do to help her recover.

      Anyway, I would rather live than die in almost any situation. The simple fact is that it can't get better after you're dead. Of course, for the religious death has less to fear, but then again a lot of religions tell you that you're going to hell if you kill yourself, so trading torment here for eternal torment there doesn't seem like much of a deal.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    54. Re:Be careful... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      No, not a badass, but realisticly, can he swing to cover me and deliver a shot in the 3/4 second of my aged reaction times? Remember, I'm already at the ready & all I have to do is pull. To beat me, he would have to be awfull fast and a good shot to boot. I'm a fair shot with that piece, and I doubt I would miss from 10-15 feet. As far as partners, I have sense enough to scan that before mine comes out.

      They are admittedly not very good odds for either of us, but I'd think my chances are better than his if he has to swing 90 degress or more to my location. He would have to swing at least that much in my local gomart store.

      Tough guy? Not really. I only bet on sure things. Thats why I don't play the lottery.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
      soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

    55. Re:Be careful... by Kombat · · Score: 1

      No, not a badass, but realisticly, can he swing to cover me and deliver a shot in the 3/4 second of my aged reaction times? Remember, I'm already at the ready & all I have to do is pull. To beat me, he would have to be awfull fast and a good shot to boot.

      But it's not that simple, that's my point. He has other options. He doesn't have to turn on the spot and point his gun at you. He could dive sideways behind an aisle. It's exponentially hard to hit a moving target. So if he decides to shoot it out with you, he'll be bobbing and weaving all over the place, ducking for cover and running crouched down. Can you still do that?

      What will you do if he dives behind an aisle? Open fire? You see, he has an advantage here, because you have to watch your backdrop, whereas he might not care if he misses you and hits an innocent bystander. What if he pops up with a hostage? You've just served to escalate an already tense situation to "truly lifethreatening" levels.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    56. Re:Be careful... by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you concerning the mindset, but that's essentially my point. THAT is why it is worse, for a lot of people. Maybe you could handle it, maybe others could. And for you, death is worse. But to others, who maybe couldn't handle it as they are, would prefer death.

      In my opinion, even death pales in comparison to perpetual agony, whether physical or emotional. I don't fear death. I dont' believe in an afterlife, and I'm certainly not rushing towards death by any stretch of the imagination, but it certainly doesn't terrify or bother me as much as it does others. There are some situations where I would prefer death to life - assured slavery, terminal cancer, etc, etc. For me, emotional reasons probably wouldn't be one of them (short of losing my family in a horrible accident that was my fault in some way...not sure I could handle living with that). But that's me. For others, living with it is far worse than death. And most certainly worse than identity fraud :]

    57. Re:Be careful... by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Locally, he doesn't have an aisle to duck into unless he can teleport himself 15-20 feet from a position at the registers. He is a wide open, virtually sitting duck target with only one place to go & thats over the counter, which has a low overhead he'll knock himself silly on. That improves my odds a bit. Still not 100% odds, but close enough for me to try them.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
      soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

    58. Re:Be careful... by Impotent_Emperor · · Score: 1

      Guns are a security blanket for the brainwashed masses.


      I'd argue that gun control is a security blanket. There's a belief that says that removing guns from law abiding citizens will somehow get the guns out of criminals' hands. Criminals can make the guns themselves or smuggle them from other countries. And there's always the use of other deadly weapons: knives, clubs, bombs, brass knuckles, etc.

      Guns don't have media support (at least not much). CNN is much more likely to support gun control and not gun ownership. I think the reasoning goes along: guns can harm people, so guns are bad, therefore we must get rid of guns. But guns have a very good use as self-defense tools. And they are very good tools. The user does not have to be bigger, stronger, or faster than a criminal; he only needs to be well-trained in using his gun.

    59. Re:Be careful... by bani · · Score: 1

      the real question is if guns in the hands of civilians saves more lives than they take (remember to count fatal accidents including ones involving children). or if a highly armed populace makes the US a safer place to live.

    60. Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, do you have the gun drawn and aimed at his back the entire time he's taking money from the register so you can shoot him as he turns or do you let him take the $75, shoot the clerk, and then you draw and shoot from the hip?

      If it's the former scenario, are you concerned that your actions might elevate a situation from armed robbery where $75 is stolen to felony murder where the clerk did everything right and through no fault of his own is dead? Would this bother you or is it all the robber's fault for engaging in armed robbery in the first place?

      If it's the latter scenario, do you think you can draw your (assumedly concealed) weapon, aim, and shoot faster than he can sweep his weapon in your direction or would you dive behind an aisle? Does the "perp" then leave the store or do you wait in ambush behind the aisle with your gun at the ready?

      I'm just trying to get the whole jist of the hero fantasy that plays through your mind.

      Now, I think most people (at least Americans with our movies and TV) have these little fantasies (I do), but there is a difference between your imagination and the probability of you being involved in such an incident and the probability of you being able to help as you would like and the probability of your help resulting in a good or at least better outcome.

      This is why your scenario is described as masturbatory by another. Your scenario is unlikely enough that it really serves no purpose other than to make you have good feelings. Just like your thoughts of a private encounter with Milla Jovovich or your thoughts of winning the lottery. Sure they might happen, but even then they aren't likely to happen as you've fantasized.

      As an aside, I don't have anything against concealed carry permits. I think it would be uncomfortable to have a holster, though. (Same with a cell phone holster.) Although, it would be nice to carry a gun in my car a little more freely as opposed to transporting it in the trunk. Guns are, quite frankly, neat with the power and precision they pack into such a small frame.

    61. Re:Be careful... by LandGator · · Score: 1

      Oregon's a "Shall Issue" state, as is Washington; in fact, getting a Washington toter's card for Oregonians is as simple as saying, "I travel in Washington on business". Now, if we could just get reciprocity with Florida.... as only 12 states honor Oregon's toter's card, and the Sunshine State ain't one of 'em.

      --
      The TSA is a test. It is only a test......
      "Find out just what people will submit to, and you have found out the exact amount of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them; and these will continue until they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they oppress." -- Frederick Douglass, August 4, 1857.

      --
      There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
  10. It's real hard to resist confrontation by Oriumpor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In a situation like this where you know the culprit is standing only a few meters away from you its so tempting to confront the thief. I admire his resolve.

    I never really thought how much power you the credit card holder have in these situations. A few proactive measures can go a great deal further than a phone call to a dusty beurocrat.

    1. Re:It's real hard to resist confrontation by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Depends on personality really. I personally would relish the feeling of knowing I'm shadowing this guy and that the cops are on the way.

  11. this is why by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 4, Interesting

    this is wnhy you get a prepaid visa or mastercard for online purchases. id rather spend the 30 minutes to put the cash on the card and buy something online with it than than let some druggy scum waltz off with my hard earned money. http://www.netspend.com/ Netspend offers inexpensive prepaid visa and mastercards that are useable anywhere.

    1. Re:this is why by LokieLizzy · · Score: 1
      " this is wnhy you get a prepaid visa or mastercard for online purchases...Netspend offers inexpensive prepaid visa and mastercards that are useable anywhere."

      Or, instead of letting Netspend waltz off with your hard earned money, you could simply get a debit card backed by Visa, Mastercard, or your credit card of choice. Because that's basically what a "prepaid Credit Card" is.

      --
      My digital rights don't need management.
    2. Re:this is why by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0

      id rather spend the 30 minutes to put the cash on the card and buy something online with it than than let some druggy scum waltz off with my hard earned money.

      Please, they're not stealing the money from you. If you haven't done anything negligent (like lose your card which you never signed), you're responsible for nothing. Even if you have been negligent, with most credit card agreements you're still responsible for nothing. At the most you're responsible for like $50 if you report your card lost or stolen within a reasonable amount of time. And that's just if you lost your card, without having signed the back, and the thief stole the card, signed the back, bought something with the card, using the same signature, and managed to not get caught.

    3. Re:this is why by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      isn't that a debit card and comes of your money ie they can clear your account and break your overdraft limit in the process?

      you know what would be real nice and pretty safe. a voucher like you can get for prepay phones. you go to your local outlet these days for phones its a printed till reciept with a code number on it. Buy from there a voucher and spend that online the voucher has a maximum value so your risk is limited to the voucher value - what you bought with it.

      Basically a one time credit card if you can do it for phone time why not for buying other goods and services the vendor is happy gets his money instantly wired to his account you get the security of a one time transaction and dont have to wait for a cheque to clear before being sent your goods.

      cool idea no identy fraud no waiting.

    4. Re:this is why by reflous · · Score: 0

      I don't know what the statistics are, but the identity thieves from this story could have stolen Ovid's trash, or obtained the information in a far less technologically advanced way.

      It is very rare that customer information is stolen from reputable online stores. When it happens, it is a major story, so if you read the newspapers, you'll find out about it right away, early enough to do something about it proactively.

      The risk (for most people) just doesn't justify the huge expense of some of the current prepaid options like netspend. If you're really concerned the only way to not leave any sort of trail is to use cash, always.

    5. Re:this is why by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Can you get those things anonymously? If so that's kind of cool.

      As far as security though, I'd rather use a credit card than a debit card. With a credit card, the worst case scenario is they can convince someone else I owe them money. With a debit card, they can take my money and it's up to me to get it back.

    6. Re:this is why by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0

      a stolen debit card can drain your bank account and you're screwed (or at least you're liable for like $500)

      That was true back when debit cards first came out, but nowadays most if not all debit cards offer the exact same legal protections as credit cards. The problem with them is that it's up to you if there's a dispute to convince the bank to follow the law.

    7. Re:this is why by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Debit cards are for suckers.

      Either the kind of sucker who believes all the advertising or the kind of sucker who can't manage credit and thus has such a poor credit history that they can't get a real credit card.

      In ALL ways credit cards are equal or better than debit cards.

      Meanwhile, if you wish to avoid people stealing your CC# online, get a card with Citibank or MBNA. Both of them have the 100% free service of generating single-use or "disposable" credit card accounts with configurable spending limits and expiration dates that can only be used by a single merchant. So if someone steals it after the legit vendor has charged it, it is no good. If the legit vendor turns out to be not so legit, they still can't charge more than you authorized.

      I've used my MBNA "shopsafe" account for tens of thousands of dollars worth of charges online and never once had any fraud. Reportedly, neither MBNA nor citibank have ever experienced fraudulent charges on their disposable numbers, but that may just be advertising hype.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:this is why by The-Bus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Except they don't really walk off with your hard earned money. I worked at XYZ credit card bank in their inward fraud department and it was usually something as simple as saying "These charges aren't mine." I say, "OK", tag them as such, and the merchant needs to come up with proof otherwise they pay. Usually, if we suspected it is a family member (say, calls to 900#s originating from their home), we ask them if they are willing to prosecute. That's the tough choice usually, if they know their $relative has been using their card.

      But usually the maximum you are responsible under federal law is $50 for any fraud (not per charge, for all the fraud). A lot of places will waive that and pay it themselves so you don't get pissed off.

      One time, I got a call in from someone who suspected this person was using a stolen card. They were at an electronics store buying a big screen TV and the teller said the guy looked suspicious. Well, we get the card info while the manager acts like he's "processing the order", we call the number associated with the account, and I ask, "Sir, are you in a store right now buying a big screen TV?"

      He says, "No, I am not."

      "Do you have your XYS Visa on you?"

      "Yeah, it's right her--- where'd it go?"

      We called the cops while the guy was waiting around for his TV to get prepared.

      Anyway, long story short,the article is not about "identity theft" since the guy just stole the guy's credit card number / mail somehow, just regular fraud. It is an interesting article though. And what he described is pretty common. Figure we havd a group of about 50 people working full-time just talking on the phone with people who suspected fraud. This was not counting the people who called customers who may have fraud, nor the people investigating the fraud either.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    9. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this myth ever going to die? At one point that MAY have been true, I don't know. But for YEARS now it hasn't been true. Every time this comes up I post the links to the MC/Visa fraud protection guarantees proving zero liability for debit cards. This time you can find it yourself, it's just not worth my fucking time anymore.

    10. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I automatically get a debit card with my bank account, no need to fill in any extra forms. I have no need to buy stuff on credit. If I can't afford something I will wait till I can.

      Explain to me exactly how I am a sucker because I don't want to have a credit card and don't want to end up playing the shuffle your balance every 9 months or whenever the 0% rate runs out.

      Also it is not just poor credit history that will effect getting a card. If you have no credit history you can also get listed as a liability.

      The real suckers are the people who are members of the mindless consumer society that absolutly must go out and spend spend spend.

    11. Re:this is why by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Hey let me ask you a question then -- recently I bought a product from compgeeks.com and it was 100% defective, and they would NOT take it back. I disputed the charge (online), never spoke to a human being about it, and my account was credited the money after 5 or 6 weeks. So my question is -- as someone who has worked for a CC company -- what went wrong, and why couldn't I dispute legit charges and get away with it?

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    12. Re:this is why by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      In ALL ways credit cards are equal or better than debit cards.

      Sorry, bud, its just not true. Don't you read enough around here to know not to say words like "always", "never" or use stats like "100%"? Anyway, to my point. In order to keep track of our finances, my wife and I moved to 100% debit card transactions years ago. We moved over $6k a month through the cards. Then, when I started traveling on business, I decided to get a credit card to get hotel points. My credit score dropped 60 points because of high credit card levels. Forget the fact that I pay the card down to $0 every month, that doesn't matter. Its the high average daily balance. Don't you check your credit scores?

      The second huge problem of credit cards vs debit cards is that multiple family members get the same card number. Right after my first trip to Europe, our credit cards were cancelled because they "bought it on a list of cards from a hacker site online".

      So again, it negaitvely impacts your credit rating, and the same number is given to all cardholders, so if one card is stolen or lost *all* cardholders are screwed until new cards arrive.

      Credit cards suck vs debit cards. And now that debit cards have the same exact fraud protection as credit cards, that goes doubly so.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    13. Re:this is why by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's because you're paying the balance off every month. Wise customers like you don't generate profitable carryover interest and late fees.

    14. Re:this is why by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      It's good that CC companies put a lot of effort into handling fraudulent charge complaints. Why is it, though, that the same care isn't taken to prevent real identity theft by preventing people from fraudulently opening new lines of credit in another person's name? Serious question here, not a flame.

    15. Re:this is why by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

      i could use a debit card from my bank but if its not visa/mastercard then its difficult to make online purchases with, if it is a visa/mastercard and it gets stolen then its connected to my bank account and i could be tapped dry very quickly.

      with a prepaid card i only have to put the amount i want to spend on it and if it gets stolen then the person who took it would only have access to the $2 or $3 thats left over from purchases, you couldnt even buy a pack of cigarettes with that much.

    16. Re:this is why by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Not a darn thing -- if you do it once. But thieves never can stop with just one score.

    17. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong, debit cards don't have the legal protection of credit cards. While you do have limited liability with Visa debit cards (not sure about Mastercard nowadays) that comes from the Visanet agreement your bank signs in order to be able to issue Visa cards, not from federal or state law.

    18. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct, but that protection comes from the contract your bank signed with Visa (and presumably Mastercard) in order to be allowed to issue their credit and debit cards. You have absolutely zero legal protection from liability for stolen debit cards, the only protection you have is what Visa and Mastercard force the banks to provide through their contracts.

    19. Re:this is why by OnlineAlias · · Score: 1

      And *NONE* of this is applies to debit cards. People, do NOT use check cards, they are a very very evil way for banks to eliminate their risk and paper check processing costs while making consumers think they are not liable. You ARE liable for *anything* that comes over an EFT transer, otherwise known as a debit card....

      Your bank account may be cleaned out, and the banks have no legal obligation to refund your cash...

    20. Re:this is why by nilbog · · Score: 1

      Do they make you give them your credit card number to put money on the prepaid card?

      --
      or else!
    21. Re:this is why by Yavi · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend and I have American Express cards linked to the same account and we have different numbers. It just depends on your bank.

    22. Re:this is why by Suidae · · Score: 1

      Yep yep. Thats all I've got, so I have two accounts, one I use online and just transfer money to when I need it, and I make the bank issue me a new card every three months.

      Its not perfect, but its better than nothing.

    23. Re:this is why by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      My credit score dropped 60 points because of high credit card levels.

      Big deal, if you have good credit in the first place, 60 points won't make a difference in the kind of interest rates you can qualify for if you need a loan.

      Meanwhile, by using debit cards you:

      1) Lost federal protection for fraud, you have to rely on company promises which may evaporate or change meaning when you can least afford it. This include the standard getting your money back but also covers things that can't happen with a credit card like bounced check penalties (from both your bank and the merchant to whom you wrote out the check) because your account was fraudulently overdrawn.

      2) Lost the free income due to interest on the float, at $6K/month it adds up.

      3) Put at risk your ability to do chargebacks - all credit cards process chargebacks for free per federal law, some debit cards charge you a fee to process a chargeback because, well they can since there is no law regulating that.

      So, I stand by my original statement debit cards are for suckers - the suckers who believe the advertising (which you apparently have when you claim fraud protection is identical when it isn't) or the suckers who can't manage their credit (in which case 60 points on your credit score can make or break a loan qualification).

      As for unique numbers, as another poster already said, it depends on your bank and that also goes just as much for debit cards. When my CU issued my wife and I ATM/debit combo cards they both had the same numbers, which were derivative of the checking account# they were linked to. (we immediately had the CU disable the debit functionality because we did not want the additional risk with no additional value).

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    24. Re:this is why by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I have no need to buy stuff on credit.

      You are clearly ignorant of much of the power of credit cards, none of which requires you to carry a balance.

      Do some research, consider it the financial equivalent of checking out the "preferences" panel of firefox.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    25. Re:this is why by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      Did he try to sign his name as "not a valid signature"? :P

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
    26. Re:this is why by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 1

      nope. aslong as i give them the cash i dont even have to give them a valid photo ID. just a name and a address (doesnt have to be my address)

    27. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      this is wnhy you get a prepaid visa or mastercard for online purchases. id rather spend the 30 minutes to put the cash on the card and buy something online with it than than let some druggy scum waltz off with my hard earned money.

      Alternatively, get a credit card that lets you generate a separate virtual credit card number for each purchase. The one I have lets me create virtual numbers that are only good at one merchant and which expire the month after they're created. They're also supposed to let me put a maximum total dollar amount on the virtual number, although I haven't figured out how to use that feature yet. (It may be that you have to install the Windows client to do that and that the Java applet version I've been using doesn't support that feature. Why it can't just be a simple web page, I don't know, but they seem to have crackmonkeys designing their web interface.)

      Anyway, I've started using these for all my online purchases. Works like a charm. I think this pretty much makes the problem of giving your credit card number out on the web a solved problem. (At least for one-time purchases. Periodic purchases might be a little tougher, but I think that, again, the Windows software may have some feature that supports doing that.)

      Now all I have to worry about is some punk teenaged kid that likes eating at Denny's stealing my mail and charging up a storm. Unfortunately, there is no easy to way to protect against that.

    28. Re:this is why by eyeye · · Score: 1

      I wish you dealt with my CC!

      I am still waiting for barlcaycard (a UK cc company) to refund a fraudulent charge for £500. I have been their customer for 15 years and do not fall behind on my payments and have never had fraud on my account, yet they still havent taken this off my account 3 months later - they are still "looking into it".

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    29. Re:this is why by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Tell them that if they aren't going to do something about it sometime soon, then you'll be switching to a different bank / CC company. That's something banks usually care about, especially if you've been a long-term customer.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    30. Re:this is why by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      Well, inexperienced / naive / greedy thieves can't. I think it's a Best Practice (so to speak) among credit card thieves to just use cards once and them get rid of them, no matter how tempting it may be to keep them and use them again; the two mentioned in this story probably didn't keep that in mind since they seemed to have been drug addicts and thus probably were quite desperate for the money.

      Of course, using a stolen credit card to order *breakfast* is still just stupidity.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    31. Re:this is why by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Sure there is. Replace your mailbox with a locking, slot-fed mailbox. Larger packages won't fit, but the majority of your mail will be secured. Now, sure, someone could break into that, too, but random kid stealing random mail won't be much of a problem.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    32. Re:this is why by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think experienced thieves don't even use the cards themselves. They just sell them to people who specialize in turning them into cash. And they don't steal one card number at a time either.

    33. Re:this is why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In ALL ways credit cards are equal or better than debit cards.

      Except for the 0% APR, you mean?

  12. more restraint than me .... by icebrrrg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... i would have found it very difficult to resist the urge to take some very gratifying physical revenge on the perps. bravo to ovidius. this won't stop identity theft, but it surely promotes a bit more vigilance on the potential victims ...

    --
    nothing worth possessing isn't possessed. or something.
  13. For that matter... by LokieLizzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems a tad arrogant to declare "I caught them and had them arrested by afternoon." Why? Because if not for Discover, and Visa's fraud-alert services, you wouldn't have been the wiser for quite a while longer - days or weeks, perhaps. You didn't do this by yourself. To imply otherwise denies the actions of many people working behind the scenes to make sure that when this stuff happens, it doesn't ruin innocent people's lives.

    --
    My digital rights don't need management.
    1. Re:For that matter... by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      No, law prevents credit card fraud from ruining people's lives.

      Discover and Visa are simply looking out for their own financial losses. The quicker they stem the fraudulent use, the less they have to pay out to cover it.

    2. Re:For that matter... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Nonsense.

      If someone is killed and it is reported to the police, who then catch them... how exactly weren't the police instrumental?

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    3. Re:For that matter... by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one EVER works alone and does a task entirely by themselves. Are you going to give credit to Alexander Graham Bell for inventing the telephone he used to call the police too? The distinguishing factor here is that he is the only person who would have even possibily caught this guy. The credit card company would have just written it off as a loss. The police would have written it up as a statistic. Ovid is by far the person most responsible for catching them.

      It's great the the CC company has fraud detection, but that's really not intended to catch anyone, merely to reduce losses.

      --
      AccountKiller
    4. Re:For that matter... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      umm, yeah. "who then catch the killer". The police catching themselves (or the corpse, depending how you read that) isn't particularly impressive.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    5. Re:For that matter... by damiangerous · · Score: 1
      Why? Because if not for Discover, and Visa's fraud-alert services, you wouldn't have been the wiser for quite a while longer - days or weeks, perhaps.

      Yep. And what's better is that after he gets a call from Discover he does nothing about the Visa account. Well, actually he goes and writes a journal entry about how great Discover is and how lucky he was they called him. While the Visa cards continues uncanceled for at least an hour until they call him. You'd think at some point he'd at least want to check on any other accounts he has.

    6. Re:For that matter... by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, the Visa card in question was a date expired card, i.e. Costco accepted a card past it's expiration date, and ignored Visa's decline to accept for the transaction, forcing it through anyway.

      I personally have never tried this, and suspect that most of the businesses I have dealt with would not have allowed the transaction. I may be wrong, but in my mind attempting it is fraud anyway.

      Also if you read the journal entry again, Visa had called him first, though the number he tried to call back strangely went to a cell phone from the recording he got. Visa needs to check that out to figure out why their trunk numbers are going to a cell phone, but they did attempt to notify him first.

      ~Rusty

      --
      You never know...
    7. Re:For that matter... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Costco accepted a card past it's expiration date,

      You'd think they'd be waaay smarter than that. Costco was practically guaranteed to get charged back, meaning they'd be out the merchandise with no money to show for it.

    8. Re:For that matter... by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      Oh I wasn't complaining about Visa in the slightest. I just thought it was amusing he was sitting there patting himself on the back while, for all he knew, they could have been jacking his Visa card through the roof since he didn't do anything to mitigate related damage. Most people, after hearing someone's been racking up fraudulent charges would think, "I hope they didn't get to any of my other accounts."

    9. Re:For that matter... by publius_ovidius · · Score: 1

      Actually, I mentioned that Costco.com put the charge through with an incorrect expiration date, not an expired one. An expired date is generally kicked out immediately (I've written CC processing software). An incorrect date isn't necessarily kicked back, but it can be checked and it should be.

    10. Re:For that matter... by cliveholloway · · Score: 1

      Are you going to give credit to Alexander Graham Bell for inventing the telephone he used to call the police too?

      No, but I would credit Antonio Meucci for inventing the telephone, and ask the police to arrest Bell for stealing his patent - well, if he was around today I would :)

      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
  14. Violence Can Solve All by ellem · · Score: 3, Funny

    No joke. I would have gutted those two like pigs. Throat to groin. Wouldn't have thought twice about it. Not any issue at all.

    Ovid, you are a sane man.

    * hey are you Ovid from Perl Monks & the Perl Monks Seti team?

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
    1. Re:Violence Can Solve All by autark · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe he is. At least, the picture on his blog matches the picture over at perlmonks.

    2. Re:Violence Can Solve All by publius_ovidius · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yup. I'm the same Ovid.

    3. Re:Violence Can Solve All by BradNelson · · Score: 1

      This is why my company NEVER gives out information on fraudulent purchases to ANYONE other than a law enforcement agency. We're not going to be liable for your vigilantism.

    4. Re:Violence Can Solve All by Hero+Zzyzzx · · Score: 1

      How lawyerly of you.

    5. Re:Violence Can Solve All by sinserve · · Score: 1

      Great, now when the bitter thieves are out after serving their sentence, they know who to gut from throat to groin.

    6. Re:Violence Can Solve All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, 'cause the first thing a small-time addict wants to do after spending a couple of months in jail/rehab is murder someone so he can spend the rest of his life behind bars.

    7. Re:Violence Can Solve All by Cytlid · · Score: 1

      Ovid: I apologize for my (other) post. ... s/DUMMY/SILLY/ ... Please consider it friendly banter. Good detective work!

      --
      FLR
    8. Re:Violence Can Solve All by publius_ovidius · · Score: 1

      No worries. I don't get riled up too easily. At least not online. I've embarrassed myself a time or two doing that, so I try to avoid it now.

    9. Re:Violence Can Solve All by cooley · · Score: 1

      Hey Ovid, good game there man. You showed both brains and balls, which is something too many lack both of. At the very least, most folks would have sat at home waiting for the cops to "take care of" the matter.

      Cooley

      --
      Just then the floating disembodied head of Colonel Sanders started yelling Everything You Know Is Wrong!-Weird Al
    10. Re:Violence Can Solve All by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "No joke. I would have gutted those two like pigs."

      Yeah, I buy that. Everybody's real brave in cyberspace. Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Violence Can Solve All by arcanumas · · Score: 1

      which just goes to show.... don't mess with a guy who willingly reads line noise. He is crazier than you :)

      --
      Slashdot Sig. version 0.1alpha. Use at your own risk.
    12. Re:Violence Can Solve All by ellem · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I'm psychotically violent. Seriously read my posts. I have major issues.

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    13. Re:Violence Can Solve All by ellem · · Score: 1

      Excellent. Been on your Seti team since like.. I don't know 2000-2001. My machine sucks but we try. (ie I can't bring myself to put Seti on my Powerbook :) )

      --
      This .sig is fake but accurate.
    14. Re:Violence Can Solve All by publius_ovidius · · Score: 1

      I know the feeling. I love my G4 iBook, but it runs about as fast as a one-legged greyhound. Setiathome doesn't seem like a good choice.

    15. Re:Violence Can Solve All by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I save the gutting like pigs routine for rapists and child abusers...

      But I would have gloated as they got the steel bracelets put on and walked out to the waiting jailcabs... :-)

    16. Re:Violence Can Solve All by cjsnell · · Score: 1

      No joke. I would have gutted those two like pigs. Throat to groin. Wouldn't have thought twice about it. Not any issue at all.

      No issue, other than the fact that they are IV drug users. I'll pass on gutting two shitmagnets who are possibly carrying HIV and/or hepatitis.

    17. Re:Violence Can Solve All by Danathar · · Score: 1

      Uh huh...

      "Those who beat their swords into plowshares will plow for those who dont"

  15. Hmm... by praetis · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How do we know this actually happened? People concoct amazing stories all the time.

    1. Re:Hmm... by LokieLizzy · · Score: 1

      We don't. We're just bored geeks on a Friday night. :^) But hey...it beats making fun of M$, or worshipping Apple's methods of dealing with students who break NDA's.

      --
      My digital rights don't need management.
    2. Re:Hmm... by publius_ovidius · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's a fair question.

      In this case, I happen to be "Curtis Poe", a grant manager for The Perl Foundation and in the small world of Perl, I'm moderately well-known. If I were caught making up stories like this, my reputation, and possibly my career, would be ruined.

      Also, I hope to post the police report when I get it.

    3. Re:Hmm... by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 2, Funny
      I was there in the Denny's.

      On a bet, I stole an English muffin from the kid's to-go bag. I can vouch.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in TFB he said he was going to scan and post the police report......

    5. Re:Hmm... by isometrick · · Score: 1

      How do we know that we are even here?!?

      Whoaaaa ... you're blowing my mind, dude ...

    6. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I can vouch that the story's location is legit. Right off Multnomah 'n' MLK over by Lloyd Center, right?

    7. Re:Hmm... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1

      What was on the english muffin?

      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    8. Re:Hmm... by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1

      Anomie.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  16. Wow! by tornadothrasher · · Score: 1

    What a great story!

  17. Purchases were not made online by mincognito · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More evidence that credit card signatures are useless.

    1. Re:Purchases were not made online by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      Not that I disagree with your point, but they didn't mention most of the purchases being online or not. They didn't spend several thousand dollars at Denny's and the hotel (which was online, by the way). The only other merchant they mention was Costco, and that could well have been online.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    2. Re:Purchases were not made online by Bill+Dog · · Score: 1

      The Costco in my world doesn't take Visa, only personal checks or their partnered Amex card. So either Costco's web site takes Visa but their stores don't, which I would wonder why, or something's amiss here.

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
    3. Re:Purchases were not made online by ThogScully · · Score: 1

      I remember checking Costco's website out a month or so ago, specifically to see if they'd changed that Amex-only policy because I was considering being a member. According to the website, they take anything, as I recall, but that could be online-only. If the stores are still Amex-only, then we know for sure that it was an online purchase in this case too.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    4. Re:Purchases were not made online by Mr.+Arbusto · · Score: 1

      The signatures aren't really their to verify Identinity. They are their to help prove fraud. Walking around and entering contracts to pay money using someone elses name was illegal last time I checked. It also helps cushion the consumers liability.

    5. Re:Purchases were not made online by Michael+Spencer+Jr. · · Score: 1

      (I work for a credit card processor, First National Merchant Solutions.)

      This is not evidence that credit card signatures are useless. These were card-not-present sales, so in each case the merchant was responsible for their own fraud protection. Credit card signatures are useless for consumers, because they're protected from fraud. (Chargeback rights) Credit card signatures are useful for merchants.

      So this whole thing makes about as much sense as: "radar guns useless, agree speeders." They benefit the people you are buying stuff from. They don't benefit you.

      Why not also claim that this is more evidence that retinal scans are useless? Why not also claim that this is more evidence that smartcard readers are useless? Those fraud protection systems are unrelated to card-not-present sales, just as signature verification is unrelated to card-not-present sales.

      (Modding parent down as offtopic for the above reasons might be a good idea.)

      Luckily for the general public, neither Visa nor MasterCard rely on the unqualified opinions of slashdot posters when deciding on changes to their operating regulations. Keep signing your signature panels, and keep signing your sales drafts on card-present sales. Signatures are useful for merchants, not useful for you.

      Where did this idea come from? We all know that some merchants don't care about fraud protection, so when they fail to protect themselves they get chargebacks, and either they learn or they stop taking Visa/MC. Where did we get the idea that people needed to become experts before they could tell if a signature matched another signature? Signatures have been used on legal documents for how long now? Where did we get the idea that just because some merchants don't use the fraud protection tools we give them, that those tools are useless and should be removed?

      Why aren't you using the same poor logic to conclude that password security is useless, because some users write their passwords on post-it notes? Why aren't you telling me where your network is, when you do come to that conclusion? :-)

      --Michael Spencer
      First National Merchant Solutions
      1620 West Dodge, Omaha, Nebraska 68197
      Mail stop 3270

  18. First of many by ryantate · · Score: 5, Funny

    Calling the cops three times on your cellphone: 68 cents.

    Driving to Denny's at 96 miles per hour: $1.10 in gas.

    Seeing identity-thieving bastards hauled off in handcuffs before your very eyes: priceless.

    There are some things money can buy. For everything else, there's adrenaline and instincts.

    1. Re:First of many by floodo1 · · Score: 0

      tired joke :(

      --
      I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
    2. Re:First of many by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 1
      Driving to Denny's at 96 miles per hour: $1.10 in gas.

      Speeding ticket: $500.

      Cost of court: $70.

      Remedial driving course: $300.

      Bus fare until you get your license back: $1.50 per trip. Transfers are free.

      --
      Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
      Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
    3. Re:First of many by thelenm · · Score: 1

      For everything else, there's someone else's MasterCard?

      (Sorry, that was a bad one.)

      --
      Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
  19. Cash cards by mec · · Score: 1

    I've lost about $80 in cash theft in my life.

    I've lost $0 in credit card theft, but dealing with the attempts has cost me quite a bit more in time: more than 100 times as much, in time and lost income, than the $80 cash loss.

    Cash means more privacy, fewer entries to reconcile, and less paper to shred.

  20. I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    What worries me the most is that so many people were so cooperative in trying to find "the thief". You go to Denny's, show them a credit card, and they give you a description of the person who used the credit card? That's the scary part.

    That some kid stole a couple thousand dollars from Discover Card and some Visa merchant - so what? This guy acts like they were stealing the money from him.

    1. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by rkww · · Score: 1

      This guy acts like they were stealing the money from him
      Well strangely enough, with the new chip-and-pin system they've just brought in in the UK, if the vendor doesn't accept c&p (i.e. they just take a signature), they are liable. (Although the card companies appear not to be enforcing that too strongly just yet since they can't distribute the necessary card readers fast enough.)

    2. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
      That some kid stole a couple thousand dollars from Discover Card and some Visa merchant - so what? This guy acts like they were stealing the money from him.
      They weren't stealing his money, they were stealing his time.

      Having dealt with and watched friends deal with the fallout from identity theft, I can tell you it can be pretty time-consuming, especially when you don't know what else of yours the thieves might have stolen (or worse, circulated to their peers).

      His half-day of detective work might have saved him a week of phone calls and hassle trying to get the matter fully resolved.

      --

      There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
    3. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0

      Well strangely enough, with the new chip-and-pin system they've just brought in in the UK, if the vendor doesn't accept c&p (i.e. they just take a signature), they are liable.

      Here in the US the vendor is pretty much always liable. So there's no need for a stupid chip-and-pin system. A lot of the time we don't even need a signature (gas stations, fast food restaurants, etc.)

    4. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Sanity · · Score: 1
      That some kid stole a couple thousand dollars from Discover Card and some Visa merchant - so what? This guy acts like they were stealing the money from him.
      If you don't object to people stealing from big evil corporations, how can you reasonably object when they steal from you?
    5. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That some kid stole a couple thousand dollars from Discover Card and some Visa merchant - so what? This guy acts like they were stealing the money from him.

      Don't you get it? This isn't play money. It's real money that the merchants, banks, and card processors have to cough up. Where do you think it comes from? Higher merchandise prices (or, eroded retail margins, and fewer mom-and-pop retailers as a result), higher bank fees, and higher transaction fees. All of that, all of it, trickles down to the paying consumer in one way or the other.

      Thieves like this are taking it from all of us, however indirectly. They're parasites. I completely tip my hat to someone who busted a couple of these punks while their greasy (stolen) Denny's breakfast was still impacting their short-term blood pressure. Truly delightful.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by mattkime · · Score: 1

      ...and if he was wrong? Nothing would have happened to the kids. But he was right and they were busted.

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    7. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      What worries me the most is that so many people were so cooperative in trying to find "the thief". You go to Denny's, show them a credit card, and they give you a description of the person who used the credit card? That's the scary part.
      What's so surprising about that? You should read that Mitnick book on social engineering -- then you'd realize how common it is.

      At least in this case their cooperativeness was a good thing!
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    8. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      They weren't stealing his money, they were stealing his time.

      Seems to me he stole his own time. Unless you're talking about the 3 minutes he spent on the phone telling Discover card "no, I didn't make those charges".

      Having dealt with and watched friends deal with the fallout from identity theft, I can tell you it can be pretty time-consuming,

      Well, I don't know what you mean by "identity theft", since, I mean, you can't steal someone's identity. But I know someone who had his credit card number stolen, and it didn't take up very much of his time at all. The FBI caught the people, and the employees of the people wound up with the bill.

    9. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      If you don't object to people stealing from big evil corporations, how can you reasonably object when they steal from you?

      It's pretty easy, actually. It's called a double standard.

    10. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by bani · · Score: 3, Insightful

      leave it to /. readers to get upset about credit card frauders getting caught.

    11. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Don't you get it? This isn't play money. It's real money that the merchants, banks, and card processors have to cough up.

      Actually, it's Denny's food that Denny's has to cough up, and hotel space that...probably would have gone to waste anyway. And as for the Denny's food, I mean, whatever, how much food does Denny's throw away every day anyway?

      Higher merchandise prices (or, eroded retail margins, and fewer mom-and-pop retailers as a result), higher bank fees, and higher transaction fees. All of that, all of it, trickles down to the paying consumer in one way or the other.

      The $0.00000000001 trickles down to him isn't enough to justify wasting a few hours of his time trying to catch a thief. That's what the police are paid for.

      Maybe he had fun playing cop, and hey that's worth it I guess. I dunno.

      Thieves like this are taking it from all of us, however indirectly.

      Not from all of us. Just those of us who eat at Denny's, or pay exorbitant fees to Discover Card.

    12. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That some kid stole a couple thousand dollars from Discover
      > Card and some Visa merchant - so what? This guy acts like
      > they were stealing the money from him.

      If it's no big deal, paste your name, CC number, expiry date, verification code, billing address and any other relevant information in a reply to this post.

    13. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Well, if you believe his story (and I don't), then the kids were taken to jail in handcuffs on his say-so. I wouldn't call that nothing. But I'm more concerned about the fact that a description of the kids, their room number, their habits, etc., were all given to some random Yahoo who happened to have a credit card they used.

    14. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Vellmont · · Score: 1

      How is that scary? He had the credit card that was just used a few hours ago. He didn't just flash a credit card and tell them what the numbers were. Furthermore this was a frickin Dennys, not a sex shop. What's so private about the description of someone at a Dennys?

      Are you really concerned that people might forge your credit card, then go around to restaraunts asking for descriptions of you? Your appearance isn't exactly private information, unless you wear a paper sack around your head. If you're really that paranoid just shouldn't even go outside.

      --
      AccountKiller
    15. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      What's so surprising about that?

      Nothing, really, I just think it would have made a neat story with a useful twist at the end.

      At least in this case their cooperativeness was a good thing!

      If you believe the story. I'm skeptical.

    16. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Cerv · · Score: 1
      Here in the US the vendor is pretty much always liable. So there's no need for a stupid chip-and-pin system. A lot of the time we don't even need a signature (gas stations, fast food restaurants, etc.)

      If the vendor is liable in the case of a fraudulent purchase, why don't they demand signitures? Sure it's a lousy security tool, but it's the only chance they have to spot a stolen card that could potentially cost them money.

      --
      sig
    17. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I'm not upset. I really don't care. Some guy stole some money from Discover Card. Some other guy caught them. The thief went to jail. This is news? Even if it were true, which I have my doubts about, so what?

      I think it's interesting that so many people were willing to go to such lengths on the say-so of some random guy with a credit card. The fact that those people were willing to do that is precisely why credit card theft is so easy in the first place.

    18. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by mog007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actully, Visa and Mastercard cover the expenses lost to fraud to both customer AND the business that got frauded. One of the other two or maybe both, refuses to give compensation to the business, so they eat it out of their own pocket. That's one of the biggest reasons why Visa and Mastercard are ALWAYS accepted, Discover and American Express are less so.

    19. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      If it's no big deal, paste your name, CC number, expiry date, verification code, billing address and any other relevant information in a reply to this post.

      If I did that I'd be negligent and the credit card company could sue me.

    20. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm not upset. I really don't care

      As of writing this message you've posted 13 comments about this story.

      Dude... you care. You care hard

    21. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      How is that scary? He had the credit card that was just used a few hours ago.

      And how did they know he wasn't the one who stole it?

      Are you really concerned that people might forge your credit card, then go around to restaraunts asking for descriptions of you?

      No, but it's that kind of blind trust that is what makes credit card fraud so easy in the first place.

    22. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by purves · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What worries me the most is that so many people were so cooperative in trying to find "the thief". You go to Denny's, show them a credit card, and they give you a description of the person who used the credit card? That's the scary part.

      I think you have "thief" confused with thief. They really stole his money. And why wouldn't the people at Denny's help him? He has his credit card and ID to prove that he is who he says he is. If someone else used the same card number they obviously weren't supposed to.

      That some kid stole a couple thousand dollars from Discover Card and some Visa merchant - so what? This guy acts like they were stealing the money from him.

      If someone stole your car, would you say, "So what? They're only stealing from the insurance company."? A defrauded man, his credit card companies, restaurant & hotel employees, and the police come together to arrest two thieves and somehow this is a bad thing? This is the way things should work, people taking responsibility and looking after their own interests and those of others.

    23. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by jadavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I mean, whatever, how much food does Denny's throw away every day anyway?

      Well, that's just stupid. Tell that to the waitress who served them and didn't get a dime when she could have gotten a real tip from non-criminals. Probably an overworked old lady who needed the money, too.

      One thing that people should realize is that when an anonymous big corporation gets hurt, it's not really a corporation that's getting hurt. It's the stockholders. It's everyone that has a 401(k) or a mutual fund or any other diversified investment. These aren't rich day-traders, these are old people living off this money, or young people trying to save a few bucks for when they can't work any more.

      What this guy did was every bit as noble as if he tackled a purse-snatcher. No, it's not his money, but it's someone's money, and that's a real, normal person just like you. He won't get a direct benefit, but he contributed to society.

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    24. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      If the vendor is liable in the case of a fraudulent purchase, why don't they demand signitures?

      Because the inconvenience of demanding signatures isn't worth the few dollars they lose every time someone buys a cheeseburger and fries and doesn't pay. It's the same reason they offer free refills and that if you complain about your order they give you a new one and don't even ask for the old one back.

      Try to buy something expensive without a signature, on the other hand, and you won't get very far. In fact, when I buy something expensive on a credit card I usually am asked for ID.

    25. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by bani · · Score: 1

      awesome! you totally owned his ass. no need to post anonymous, makes it harder to mod up :))

      and yes, he does desperately care. 13 comments proves it beyond all doubt.

    26. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      I don't care about the incident itself (if it actually happened). I don't care that some credit card thief got caught. I enjoy arguing about it, but I don't care...

    27. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think you have "thief" confused with thief. They really stole his money.

      How do you know this?

      And why wouldn't the people at Denny's help him? He has his credit card and ID to prove that he is who he says he is.

      Did they even check his ID? They certainly didn't check the last guy's ID that claimed to be him.

      If someone stole your car, would you say, "So what? They're only stealing from the insurance company."?

      No. I don't have insurance.

      A defrauded man, his credit card companies, restaurant & hotel employees, and the police come together to arrest two thieves and somehow this is a bad thing?

      Assuming it's true, it's not a bad thing. The end result, anyway. I think the means are a bit suspect.

      This is the way things should work, people taking responsibility and looking after their own interests and those of others.

      Bah, I can see looking out for the interests of others. But not for the interests of Discover Card or whatever other megacorp. Especially Discover Card, though. Discover Card is evil.

    28. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well, that's just stupid. Tell that to the waitress who served them and didn't get a dime when she could have gotten a real tip from non-criminals.

      You don't think the waitress got a tip? I don't see why you'd think that.

      One thing that people should realize is that when an anonymous big corporation gets hurt, it's not really a corporation that's getting hurt. It's the stockholders.

      I realize this. It doesn't change my argument. If you own stock in a corporation you're completely responsible financially for the actions of that corporation (to the extent of your investment). If you don't like what the corporation is doing, don't buy stock in it.

      It's everyone that has a 401(k) or a mutual fund or any other diversified investment. These aren't rich day-traders, these are old people living off this money, or young people trying to save a few bucks for when they can't work any more.

      So the $0.50 cheeseburger costs grandma with her 100 shares of a mutual fund which owns Denny's (is Denny's publically traded?) as 0.5% of its holdings $0.000000000005 and costs some rich guy who owns 10% of Denny's $0.005. In the end, I think the world is better for this.

      What this guy did was every bit as noble as if he tackled a purse-snatcher.

      You mean the guy who stole from Denny's? I wouldn't go that far.

    29. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by bryanp · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's Denny's food that Denny's has to cough up, and hotel space that...probably would have gone to waste anyway. And as for the Denny's food, I mean, whatever, how much food does Denny's throw away every day anyway?

      When I cleaned out my refrigerator today I threw out some food that got shoved to the back and went bad. By your logic it would be okay for some guy to sneak into my house and steal food from my pantry because I waste some of my food. Oh, but wait. I'm a person, not a corporation. There goes your precious double standard again.

      The $0.00000000001 trickles down to him isn't enough to justify wasting a few hours of his time trying to catch a thief. That's what the police are paid for.

      Not all of us want to depend on the government to take care of our every need. Besides, if you read the article you would see that the police were in no hurry to do anything until he called and told them he knew exactly where they were right that moment.

      Not from all of us. Just those of us who eat at Denny's, or pay exorbitant fees to Discover Card.

      Or those of us who purchase products from merchants who accept Discover. Here's a dirty little secret: costs roll downhill to the consumer.

      --
      "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    30. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Actully, Visa and Mastercard cover the expenses lost to fraud to both customer AND the business that got frauded

      Er... only if the merchant did every last little thing correctly. Otherwise, it's the merchant that eats it. Besides, there is no such thing as Visa/MC eating anything. They reflect the cost of doing that in the substantial fees they charge the merchants and other middlemen. They take no risks, financially, when you look at the big picture.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    31. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      When I cleaned out my refrigerator today I threw out some food that got shoved to the back and went bad. By your logic it would be okay for some guy to sneak into my house and steal food from my pantry because I waste some of my food.

      Sneaking into your house is kind of scary. But stealing food? We're talking about food here. If someone's going to risk going to jail to steal food from me, hell, I'll give her the food voluntarily.

      Oh, but wait. I'm a person, not a corporation. There goes your precious double standard again.

      No, I certainly don't care if someone steals food from you. Hell, I don't care if someone steals a million dollars from you. There's a double standard for ya.

      Not all of us want to depend on the government to take care of our every need.

      Huh?

      Besides, if you read the article you would see that the police were in no hurry to do anything until he called and told them he knew exactly where they were right that moment.

      Apparently they've got more important things to worry about than some dubious report about some idiots stealing money from Denny's. I don't blame them.

      Or those of us who purchase products from merchants who accept Discover. Here's a dirty little secret: costs roll downhill to the consumer.

      They roll downhill to the stupid consumer. The one that racks up thousands of dollars in debt at 20% interest. If I buy something from a merchant who accepts Discover, it's because the product is worth the price.

    32. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you like trolling. Moron.

    33. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      > > How is that scary? He had the credit card that was just used a few hours ago.

      > And how did they know he wasn't the one who stole it?

      And what if he was? He's not trying to use it, he's trying to track down the actual owner, so he can...do what, exactly? What evil thing is it that you're afraid might have happened here? Is he going to get his revenge because the credit limit was so low? I don't see the problem, sorry.

      > it's that kind of blind trust that...

      We don't know if it was blind trust. Maybe they asked to see his ID, and he just neglected to mention that minor detail. But whether they did or not, I still don't see the danger. Maybe I'm just not paranoid enough (wouldn't be the first time).

    34. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by GWTPict · · Score: 1

      It's an overhead you idiot, the single instance may make no discernible difference but the accumulation of those instances does. Any business plan has to take account of fraud, theft, bad debt etc. You may feel proud of your ability to do basic mathematics but you need primers in business and economics 101.

    35. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by GWTPict · · Score: 1
      who happened to have a credit card they used.

      You have a problem with the owner of a credit card having a say in who uses it?

      Do let me know what planet you're living on, I'll move there and make whoopee on your credit.

    36. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      You don't think the waitress got a tip? I don't see why you'd think that.

      At first she got one. Probably even a handsome tip, especially since the "customers" were not giving it from their own money... But usually fraudulent transactions are charged back to the merchant, so the tip basically vanished...

    37. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Apparently they've got more important things to worry about than some dubious report about some idiots stealing money from Denny's. I don't blame them.

      You obviously didn't RTFA, or this thread. The Denny's piece of the action was only one part of how the trail let to the jerks who were burning up thousands and thousands of dollars of other people's money. And don't think that even if you don't carry a balance on your credit cards - hell, even if you only pay cash for things - that the prices you may for merchandise and services everywhere you go are no impacted by theft (of all sorts, including this kind). If you shrug your shoulders at bad guys, you deserve what you get. But I don't deserve what you get, so straighten up.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    38. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      It's an overhead you idiot, the single instance may make no discernible difference but the accumulation of those instances does.

      How often does someone steal something from a Denny's with a fraudulent credit card transaction? You're acting like it happens often. The fact of the matter is that Denny's is already paying 2 or 3% for every single credit card transaction. That they pay an extra bit when someone is using a stolen card and they don't check the signature isn't a very big deal.

    39. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      You have a problem with the owner of a credit card having a say in who uses it?

      Of course not (then again, you don't own your credit card, the bank does, but besides that). I'm saying that they have no way of knowing for sure that he indeed was the owner of that credit card.

    40. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      But usually fraudulent transactions are charged back to the merchant, so the tip basically vanished...

      I would think that Denny's still honored the tip (assuming it wasn't ridiculous). Although, it probably is his or her own damn fault for not checking the signature on the card.

      Anyway, yeah, it sucks to work for Denny's and rely on people other than your employer to pay you. That's one of the reasons I won't spill any tears over Denny's getting ripped off. Hopefully the "waitress" will get a new job and the Denny's will go out of business. But I doubt it.

    41. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't RTFA, or this thread.

      You are wrong.

      The Denny's piece of the action was only one part of how the trail let to the jerks who were burning up thousands and thousands of dollars of other people's money.

      Other corporations' money... In some cases. In one case it was a hotel room that probably would have gone unused if it wasn't for the "identity thieves".

      And don't think that even if you don't carry a balance on your credit cards - hell, even if you only pay cash for things - that the prices you may for merchandise and services everywhere you go are no impacted by theft (of all sorts, including this kind).

      Not significantly. If the rate of fraud were significant, then you'd see a lot more stores which don't accept credit cards, and you could turn to them to buy your stuff. The credit card companies would eventually go out of business, and the world would be a better place. But it isn't significant.

    42. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      This guy acts like they were stealing the money from him.

      Had they not been caught, it is likely that they may have stuck the cardholder with the bill in the end. Merchants don't roll over that easily anymore.

      --
      -- $G
    43. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I'm going way offtopic here...

      But when the fuck did people other than restaurant waiting personel (waiter/waitress) start asking for and even expecting tips? I have no problem giving waiters and waitress tips, since they actually a wage that is specifically designed to be supported by tips (which is why they make $2-3 hr, the rest made up by tips, unless they don't at least make minimum wage, which then the employee has to cover the difference).

      I see it at salon's/barbershops. I have to tip the bastards now to get a decent haircut. I even had a Sonic "waitress" ask me for a tip. Twice. See this post. Should I start asking for a tip whenever I receive a phone call from a cable modem customer asking for assistance because they can't get online? When will the fucking madness stop?

    44. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Had they not been caught, it is likely that they may have stuck the cardholder with the bill in the end. Merchants don't roll over that easily anymore.

      They don't have a choice. When you dispute a charge, if the merchant can't produce a receipt with your signature on it, they're SOL.

    45. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by jedrek · · Score: 1

      Because American Express acts as a clearinghouse for all confirmation (your don't go through a bank, you only go through AmEx), if a merchant gets AmEx confirmation, it's as good as money in his pocket. Visa/MC MAY refuse.

      There are companies that will not accept payment from international clients except through wire transfer or AmEx.

    46. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> If you don't object to people stealing from big evil corporations, how can you reasonably object when they steal from you?

      > It's pretty easy, actually. It's called a double standard.

      The great thing about hypocrisy is that once you accept it in yourself, you are free to condemn it in others! ;-)

    47. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      A double standard is not the same thing as hypocrisy.

    48. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > A double standard is not the same thing as hypocrisy.

      Right, the parent wasn't a double-standards-are-hypocritical post, it was a that-reminds-me-of-a-joke post. :)

    49. Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, and my post wasn't a you-are-wrong post, it was a just-so-you-know post. :)

  21. Nothing being done about fraud at all by auzy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In fact, I'd like to add that companies like paypal penalise those who get frauded by others. In one case, a friend of mine was "paid $1000" over paypal, and a week later, paypal took it away and charged him $500 for a really dodgy reason. I constantly hear of such cases over paypal and the end result is that the frauder wins in one way or another.

    Whats even worse is that I have never seen any online store do a basic check to see if users were on a proxy or not, which could easily help reduce fraud if they did.

    Unrelated, if you want to see just how much credit card companies care about fraud, a rather funny link can be found at http://www.zug.com/pranks/credit_card/. It explains why I dont have a credit card...

    1. Re:Nothing being done about fraud at all by SlashHoe · · Score: 1


      Whats even worse is that I have never seen any online store do a basic check to see if users were on a proxy or not, which could easily help reduce fraud if they did.

      They would not be much of an online store if they refused most of their sales. What you don't think people buy things at work, behind a proxy?

    2. Re:Nothing being done about fraud at all by auzy · · Score: 1

      Open proxies I meant, with 8080 open. 99% of people with 8080 open are generally dodgy. Most businesses would have no issue as they shouldn't have it open

    3. Re:Nothing being done about fraud at all by magnugs · · Score: 1

      For some reason I have seen many people signing with "Jack Bauer" at work lately.

      This might not apply in the us:
      Signatures isn't really a problem because the handwriting is just as important as what the signature actually says. But what is more important is that, unless the purchase made does not match a spending pattern, the credit card company never see the receipt. All purchases are sent by a single end-of-day print out (containing all the credit card information from that day) and by wire. The signature on the receipt only needs to be valid if the customer later complains/doesn't remember the transaction. In the last year and a half I have had one customer complaining. I had to send a validated copy of the receipt to the cc company and 2 days later they validated the signature and completed the transaction.

      Also, over here almost all visa cards have picture id on the back of the card, which makes it really easy to validate if the cards user is the cards owner.

    4. Re:Nothing being done about fraud at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Also, over here almost all visa cards have picture id on the back of the card, which makes it really easy to validate if the cards user is the cards owner.

      My debit card has my photo on the front. I went to the student bookstore to buy texts and the cashier took the debit card and asked for a photo ID with it.

      I said, "why? My picture is on the card."

      She answered, "I know... it's just store policy, sorry."

      Hint: if I can fake the picture on the debit card, I can probably fake the signature and/or a second ID.

  22. poor ovid by Stalyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    he's happy today but just wait until tomorrow when a group of street punks beat him and take his dungeon master's guide. :(

    --
    The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
  23. Amazon alerted me... by lp-habu · · Score: 5, Interesting
    About three years ago I got an email from Amazon telling me that a new account had been opened using a credit card I used from my account.

    They closed that account and notified me immediately without authorizing any sales. I called the credit card company and found that in fact there had been three or four transactions on my card which I hadn't made. They weren't for a lot: there was one for a tank of gas, and the total was for less than a thousand dollars. The credit card company took care of the charges but seemed totally uninterested in pursuing the matter, even after I provided them contact information at Amazon. Amazon could not give me the information directly, but were anxious to provide it to the issuing bank. and urged me to contact my local law enforcement agencies.

    Stupidly, I didn't contact local law, but kept badgering the issuing bank. Finally I gave up and cancelled the account. The original card had of course been cancelled immediately when I reported the problem, but I no longer had any confidence in the bank.

    It's pretty bad when Amazon does a better job of tracking my credit card than the issuing bank does. Of course, I still do business with Amazon and I don't do business with that bank so maybe there's a moral there somewhere.

    1. Re:Amazon alerted me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Anonymous because I'm on the road)

      My husband ran into the same sort of apathy from the credit card company. It was actually a corporate card, so it wasn't a personal issue, but it still seemed vaguely disturbing.

      When I worked at the community bank, on the other hand, Retail Banking took it real personal if somebody tried to pull something with one of our debit cards. Difference between a (relatively) small company and a big one, apparently.

    2. Re:Amazon alerted me... by dcmeserve · · Score: 1
      The credit card company took care of the charges but seemed totally uninterested in pursuing the matter, even after I provided them contact information at Amazon.

      Just a cost of doing business.

      Far cheaper than actually investing in any real security measures.

      And besides, with the new bankruptcy bill that Congress just passed, their profits are going to be higher than ever.

      So a few people here and there get their identity stolen and their credit ratings thrashed; no skin off their margins!

      --
      "Orthodoxy is unconsciousness" - Orwell
    3. Re:Amazon alerted me... by HyperCash · · Score: 1

      The reason for this is that Amazon has more of a financial incentive than the credit card company does. If the charges are fraudulent the merchant pays, not the CC company. This will have to change before we start to see the CC companies start to care.

      --
      So I'm jump'n up and down screaming show me the money.
    4. Re:Amazon alerted me... by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      not only does amazon FORCE you to open an account to make purchases they STORE your credit card information. it may say your password needs to be six characters long but ONE character works.

      I confronted amazon about this issue and their only response was, no, it takes six characters.

      try it out my friends.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    5. Re:Amazon alerted me... by triffidsting · · Score: 1

      I have heard that CC thieves often use their stolen cards at gas stations. Doing so gives them the opportunity to check whether the card is still good without being in front of a human being who might remember them later.

      At least, that is what a customer service rep told me on the phone once when I was disputing some charges once.

      --
      Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
    6. Re:Amazon alerted me... by lp-habu · · Score: 1

      Sounds reasonable to me. Good idea, actually.

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. Those who live... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    in glass houses...

    oh, never mind.

  26. We need a national ID system by sPaKr · · Score: 0

    We need a national ID system that people who choose to take part of can force all credit card transactaions other sensitive transactions to require. The ID system should be optin for each citizen, but required for 100% by all information holders. Also it should be based on a PKCS#11 tokens, and allow people to select the token that they like. So the ultra paranoid (me) can use a biometericlly locked token The only reason thiefs are intrested in our personal data is that it allows them to become us. Without that their is no intrest and our privacy can return. Forcing the banks to support a common pki will not be hard, no pki no fdic insurance. That will get all the finnacals on board. And where they go everyone will follow. These people that think we dont need a national identy system are retarted, they dont see that we already have one with all the flaws, but none of the protectons a good one will give us. A national ID system could top ID theft, put a huge clamp down on spam, and reduce the value of our personal information thus increasing real privacy levels.

    1. Re:We need a national ID system by produkter · · Score: 1

      yeah, lets stamp 666 on everyone's foreheads so this never happens again, national id system is about the worst idea ever.

    2. Re:We need a national ID system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No No NO! Nonsense! I argue against this sort of crap all of the time when fools suggest this sort of thing for Passports. The trick is NOT to have a "foolproof" system (since anyone who knows anything about, say, so-called "copy protection" will know that there is no such thing). What IS needed is less technological systems and better safeguarding/contingency. The more secure you TRY to make a system, the more that people who beat it are presumed to be legitimate. If I have what appears to be a valid passport/key/card/etc., the amount of double-checking a person will do will be less. When dealing with this sort of thing, you want some security, but not too much, to ensure that everyone at each link of the chain in naturally suspicious of the entire process. Expiry date wrong? BIG RED FLAG!

      This is exactly the principle which so may fields, from social engineering to magic tricks, depend on - systems which turn naturally suspicious people into gullible ones. It's easier to trick an apathetic person than a computer, but much harder to trick a suspicious person than anything else - and as for a dozen suspicious people...

      This is a social problem, not a technology problem. Hence, it needs a social solutuion, not a technology one!

    3. Re:We need a national ID system by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      Its people like you that are happy to live in crap as you have no idea what being clean is. An opt-in PKI national ID system would solve many of these problems. You wouldnt be issued a number, you would have a public cert and a private key. It would be opt in for the morons like you that would fight it to their dieing breath until they saw how well it would work at which point you would scream at any friend, family member or stranger that didnt opt-in.

    4. Re:We need a national ID system by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      You are so right. PKI doesnt work, what was I ever thinking. You use amazon, iTMS, online air travel.. of course you dont.. those insane people use PKI and well you know you can produce a secure system so why even try. Making a more delicate system so that real people will do real work is competly wrong headed. Hoping some airline screener will do their job is insane and forcing them to as we have no real other backup system is even worse. A hand full of random personal facts does not prove idenity but that is what we have today. When are you going to wake up ans see we have already have a national id system which is has all the flaws of a bad system and none of the protections of a good system.

    5. Re:We need a national ID system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see several problems with this in reality:

      1. What happens if when the system is being launched an identity thief is able to sign up as you, prooving who you are then becomes exceptionally difficult.

      2. Your biometrics change, what happens if your disgfigured in an accident? You loose all your fingers, your eyes, your voice changes, etc.

      3. Somebody is able to forge your biometrics, for example what if someone makes a copy of your fingerprint in gelatine? Records your voice ala sneakers, etc.

      4. If biometrics where used say for cash points (ATMs) then its easy for an armed thief to rob you, march you up to the cash point at gun point and put you in front of the biometric sensors. Although this one is a problem with things like pin numbers, people often forget these under pressue and then the machine swallows the card, with biometrics this won't happen. Also since you cannot disproove that you "authorised" the transaction, how does anyone tell if your telling the truth or not?

    6. Re:We need a national ID system by GWTPict · · Score: 1

      You might want to learn to spell, and brush up on your grammar if you're going to refer to people as 'retarted', otherwise a phrase involving the words 'pot', 'kettle' and 'black' springs to mind.

    7. Re:We need a national ID system by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      Wow the spelling and grammer police are out. Way to avoid the subject and write about things that are next to useless. I will leave spelling and grammer to be corrected by the peons as it will give them something to do.

    8. Re:We need a national ID system by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      1) Initial issuing the tokens or certs is hard and thus must be done with care. Hopefully they would be issued at birth. Issuing the token will require a full background check, here we rely on the current system of 'random personal facts' we also make it a long and painfull process. The system would take note of things like issueing 1000 tokens to the same address. There would be many things looked at before tokens would be issued addresses might only one.

      2) If a token becomes compermised Certificate revocation is not a problem.

      3) This is where the free market comes in. People would be able to buy a token with the security features they feel are needed. The paranoid might want biometirc tokens, others might be happy with just a key fob. It would be up to you and the vendors that you choose to buy your token from.

      4) You are rather hung up on biometerics. True an armed thief could force you to preform the biotmetric operation but he could also take your kids hostage and send you body parts in the mail until you preform his bidding.

      Im not saying that an ID system based on PKI is perfect rather I'm saying its orders of magnitude better then what we have today. Today if you know a few random facts about a person, YOUR THEM. While some will say that ID's will always be stolen we should make it hard enough that the average crackhead 16year old can't pull it off.

    9. Re:We need a national ID system by GWTPict · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on missing the whole point, retard.

    10. Re:We need a national ID system by Kymermosst · · Score: 1
      You think anyone is going to take you seriously when you write like that?

      Allow me to fix your words as my brain parses them before I reply:

      We need a national ID system that people can choose to take part of. Those taking part could force all credit card transactions or other sensitive transactions to require it. The ID system should be opt-in for each citizen, but required for all information holders.

      It should be based on a PKCS#11 tokens, and allow people to select the token that they like. So, the ultra paranoid (me) can use a biometericlly locked token.

      The only reason thieves are interested in our personal data is that it allows them to become us. Without that there is no interest and our privacy can return. Forcing the banks to support a common PKI will not be hard: no PKI, no FDIC insurance. That will get all the financial institutions on board. And where they go, everyone will follow.

      These people that think we don't need a national identity system are retarded - they don't see that we already have one with all the flaws and none of the protections a good one will give us. A national ID system could stop ID theft, put a huge clamp down on spam, and reduce the value of our personal information thus increasing real privacy levels.

      Okay, now to reply:

      We need a national ID system that people can choose to take part of.

      We already do. It's called a state driver's license or ID card.

      Those taking part could force all credit card transactions or other sensitive transactions to require it. The ID system should be opt-in for each citizen, but required for all information holders.

      That would be a bit difficult, and you can bet it will be met with fierce resistance by liberty-minded individuals like myself, and the financial institutions.

      Besides, how long is the "opt-in" part going to last? It isn't difficult to find examples where so-called optional things have become effectively mandatory.

      It should be based on a PKCS#11 tokens, and allow people to select the token that they like. So, the ultra paranoid (me) can use a biometericlly locked token.

      Yeah, mandate the technology so when something better comes along, we're stuck with the old stuff. Not to mention the sheer expense.

      The only reason thieves are interested in our personal data is that it allows them to become us. Without that there is no interest and our privacy can return. Forcing the banks to support a common PKI will not be hard: no PKI, no FDIC insurance. That will get all the financial institutions on board. And where they go, everyone will follow.

      What does FDIC insurance have to do with credit card fraud and identity theft? You are aware that no FDIC insurance covers credit cards, right? The major credit card institutions aren't even banks. Your bank issues the card, but the card company is not a bank.

      Besides, it's not that thieves want to become us, it's just that it makes it easier to steal. No system is thief-proof, and no thief-proof society can be built. There is always a point of weakness.

      These people that think we don't need a national identity system are retarded - they don't see that we already have one with all the flaws and none of the protections a good one will give us. A national ID system could stop ID theft, put a huge clamp down on spam, and reduce the value of our personal information thus increasing real privacy levels.

      We don't need a national ID system. What we need is for credit cards to be sent via registered mail and for an end to the mailing of unrequested courtesy checks. Additionally, full account numbers should not be printed on account statements. A simple hash of the account number, delivered initially with the registered mail, could easily protect the real number and still identify a statement to an account.

      There are plenty of simple solutions that would

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    11. Re:We need a national ID system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't handle simple English, why should I assume you can handle more complex things, like the pros and cons of a national ID system?

      You could have the greatest idea ever, but if you present yourself as an illiterate moron nobody's going to spend the time and effort trying to understand the gibberish you wrote. I'm certainly not going to.

    12. Re:We need a national ID system by dbIII · · Score: 1

      With one system a single idiot who isn't paid enough to care can really ruin things for you. There are people in India who are having huge problems being recognised as being alive due to various paperwork bungles or fraud. With multiple systems of ID you can recover from identity theft - you have to think of consequences of system failure as well as trying to develop the ultimate system to solve all problems, because it may not successfully do so.

    13. Re:We need a national ID system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As a credit card thief, I agree whole-heartedly. A National ID will streamline my business tremendously, and increase gullability.

      I would vote for National ID's, except my voting privileges were removed when I was convicted a few years back.

    14. Re:We need a national ID system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These people that think we dont need a national identy system are retarted

      Apparently, those who think we do are as well. Who knew?

    15. Re:We need a national ID system by sPaKr · · Score: 1

      Ya the smooth talkers have done such a bang up job so far.

  27. Yes you do by nate+nice · · Score: 3, Informative

    "I do, however, try to be careful about not letting anyone get information about me they shouldn't and I rarely, if ever, use a credit card online."

    If you go to any store or use your credit card just about anywhere, it's on the Internet regardless of if you actually go to a Website to buy something.

    When you swipe your card to get groceries, where is that data sent? How does it get there? Through the Internet. It stays on a company database like anywhere else.

    I don't use my credit card on "shady" Websites, but I do realize when I use my card just about anywhere, that data is sent over the Internet and into a database somewhere where someone savvy enough could get access to it.

    It's for this reason I try and not use my debit card often as if someone takes my credit info and buys things, I'm not responsible for it. they haven't taken any money form me. However, if I use a debit and they take money, then that is money I have lost and it is much harder to get back.

    --
    "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    1. Re:Yes you do by pigscanfly.ca · · Score: 1

      Well actually, its normally sent over another packet switched network (like datapac) :-)

    2. Re:Yes you do by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      But doesn't this data eventually end up in a database somewhere that is globally accessible? I mean, I worked at a drugstore at one point and kind of peeked at our network setup and it's all TCP/IP with globally available IP's. I'm not sure what happens to the data when it arrives...

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    3. Re:Yes you do by Squidbait · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, every time you use your credit card in a store the number is printed on a receipt that goes in the register drawer. This drawer is closely guarded by some monkey employee making minimum wage.

      If I wanted to steal credit card numbers, I wouldn't bother trying to hack anything, I'd just get a job at a gas station and copy the receipts. Or for instance, I once worked at a travel/sales company, as a temp for almost minimum wage I might add, where the full details, ie name, address, phone, credit-card etc of around 30,000 customers were stored in Outlook as archived email messages. I could have stolen the entire thing with a simple File-Export or what have you and walked out. They wouldn't even have known it was stolen. Which is more likely, a scenario like that or having you cc number stolen while in transit over the net using heavy encryption... ?

    4. Re:Yes you do by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Right on brother. I often find it interesting that the people who handle the most important things (like cash, personal info, etc) are also the lowest paid in just about every company. Amazing this world is.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    5. Re:Yes you do by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to be the Internet, though. I remember that over here, years ago, travel agencies connected to airlines etc. using packet-mode ISDN to check flight availabilities and the like, and I would not be *entirely* surprised if that still was the case (mostly due to "never change a working system").

      It would make sense in the case of banks, too, for just the same reason - you just may not want to transfer sensitive data over the (public) Internet (whether that's strictly necessary or just paranoia stemming from a lack of knowledge with regard to how to securely transfer data over public networks is another question, of course).

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    6. Re:Yes you do by tweek · · Score: 1

      It could have been a public IP address but that doesn't mean it was publicly available. Think MPLS.

      --
      "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
    7. Re:Yes you do by mbaciarello · · Score: 1

      About a year ago, the police here (Italy) busted a shop owner who was simply saving (and reselling over the 'Net) data from the card scanner in his shop.

      If what the journalists wrote was real -- which is rarely the case -- it's really that easy.

  28. CC Fraud Not Identity theft by coloneyb · · Score: 5, Informative

    People sure have been jumping on this identity theft band wagon for about the last year. This isn't identity theft, it is Credit Card Fraud.

    Identity theft would be if I opened up a credit card using your social or if I obtained a loan using your social.

    Credit Card Fraud is stealing your credit card information and using it.

    Too bad the media just keeps misleading people to believe the two are one and the same.

    1. Re:CC Fraud Not Identity theft by LokieLizzy · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up to (Score:10, Mandatory Reading) if I could. This is definitely one of those things we're all getting confused on. Sort of like "off of" instead of "off". As in, he jumped "off of" the boat, which is *WRONG*, compared to he jumped "off" the boat. "Off of" is never a part of acceptable English grammar, even though the media seems to be doing its best to engrain it within the cultural vernacular.

      --
      My digital rights don't need management.
    2. Re:CC Fraud Not Identity theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be pretty upset to nitpick like that. guess you've been busted in the past.

    3. Re:CC Fraud Not Identity theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the perpetrator had a visa "check" in his pocket... how did he get that check? looks like identity theft to me

    4. Re:CC Fraud Not Identity theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering that it was this guys credit card, he probably stole the check out of the guys mail.

    5. Re:CC Fraud Not Identity theft by uberdave · · Score: 1

      And the "fraud" part of "credit card fraud" is... you guessed it, passing yourself off as the card holder. Credit card fraud is merely a particular form of identity theft.

    6. Re:CC Fraud Not Identity theft by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked credit cards are not generic, but (supposed to be) tied to your name and signature. In other words, you have to convince a machine or a person that you are the authorized user of the card in order to use it. I.e., you have to assume my identity to use my card.

      I would pretty much call that a type of identity theft, or if you want to be pedantic and picky, a type of identity theft was required in order for the credit card fraud to occur. I'm afraid I can't see the point in disengaging the two. It is the assumption or theft of identity that is the real problem in any case. If the system were working properly no charges could have been made on the cards.

    7. Re:CC Fraud Not Identity theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is definitely one of those things we're all getting confused on. Sort of like "off of" instead of "off". As in, he jumped "off of" the boat, which is *WRONG*, compared to he jumped "off" the boat. "Off of" is never a part of acceptable English grammar, even though the media seems to be doing its best to engrain it within the cultural vernacular.

      It may be unacceptable in formal English, but it has been part of the "cultural vernacular" for a long, long time (over 100 years).

      Plus, it makes perfect sense as the opposite of "onto," if not as a synonym for "from."

  29. Phat Lip by sbillard · · Score: 1

    Oh my!

    How did this guy resist popping the punk in the mouth? I would've knocked his fronts out. He had a perfect sucker punch opp - back to him sitting down *_BANG_* fucker sees a flash of white and then *_POW_* ... he goes dark.

    I'm not normally a violent person, but this would've been perfect. The cops are already on their way. $20 to the manager says he didn't see anything but blood and teeth on the floor.

    1. Re:Phat Lip by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It might be fun to think about, but in real life the situation is much more straightforward if there is only one set of criminals in the picture. Battery is a crime, and the story wouldn't be nearly as compelling if it ended with our protagonist going to jail instead of the thieves.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    2. Re:Phat Lip by danielrose · · Score: 1

      It's not our fault identify theives trip over their own fucked up feet and smash their head on desks or similar

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    3. Re:Phat Lip by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      it's not our fault identify theives trip over their own fucked up feet and smash their head on desks or similar


      Adding perjury to the charges won't help either. At the end of the day, you're either law-abiding or your not; if you're not, then it absolutely is your fault.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:Phat Lip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, if I knew some punk stole a CC and witnessed the rightful owner taking a swing or more at him, I might just be inclined to color the description of events a bit when the cops arrived:

      "The suspect tripped and hit his head on the counter officer. 47 times."

  30. Chief Wiggum by Poeir · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like this guy caught his own criminal. Unlike the rest of you lazy slobs.

    --
    Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    1. Re:Chief Wiggum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..lazy bones. Those criminals aren't going to catch themselves...

  31. Let me see... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    ...they mount Trojan horses, right? (ba-doom-ching)

    Seriously, that is amazing. I gotta move there; I prefer the CN over the Empire, and I'd rather not have an easy-to-get number used as my very identification. It's too easy here; I don't know about where you are (but clearly they gave you some nice help kicking identity-thief ass).

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    1. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'd rather not have an easy-to-get number [SSN] used as my very identification. It's too easy here; I don't know about where you are

      According to this page, "unless an organization can demonstrate that your [Social Insurance Number]" (equivalent to the American SSN) "is required by law, or that no alternative identifier would suffice to complete the transaction, you cannot be denied a product or service on the grounds of your refusal to provide your SIN."

      I've had no problems withholding the number from landlords and banks.

    2. Re:Let me see... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      The US has the same kind of protection in law

    3. Re:Let me see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But not in practice. Have you ever tried to get along without your SSN? It was hell in undergraduate to get them to assign me a free-form Student ID #. You can get a driver's license in most states that leaves off your SSN, but you still need to provide an alternate ID that HAS your SSN on it to get it. Most health insurance systems automatically use your SSN. I've never seen any place on an application form for you to specify that you'd like to use something else. In fact, most organizations will count on getting your SSN for a unique ID number. It's not that they require it specifically, but that they really aren't equipped to handle the few cases where people want to exercise their rights under the law.

    4. Re:Let me see... by Flendon · · Score: 1

      or that no alternative identifier would suffice to complete the transaction

      Most companies will simply say that their computer systems are not designed to accept anything else, they will look into upgrading the system in the not so near future and their is nothing they can do about it for now. Short of a long exspensive lawsuit your only other alternative is to go with another company...that will also require your SSN.

      --
      chown -R us ./base
  32. Biohazard by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    An emergency responder had another party dispose of needles in a coke bottle?

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  33. I RTFA by Cytlid · · Score: 5, Informative

    And all I can say is ... "SHRED THOSE CHECKS, DUMMY!". I have a discover card and get those all the time. I *Do NOT* toss them out. They get shredded in about 1 million little pieces.

    I shred just about anything that might have any information about me, my family, or my bills or creditors/debtors. This guy coulda saved himself some grief. The kid prolly saw him check his mail from a PO box and then shake his head and toss the checks in the trash, where he retrieved them.

    In fact, it bugs me Discover sends me those checks all the time. I never use them, probably never will, and wish they wouldn't send them so frequently.

    --
    FLR
    1. Re:I RTFA by ydrol · · Score: 1
      And all I can say is ... "SHRED THOSE CHECKS, DUMMY!". I have a discover card and get those all the time.
      Here in the UK some of the cheques are stolen by casual post office staff before they are delivered, and subsequently used in "Cardholder Not Present" transactions.

      Call your CC company and ask them not to send cheques. In the UK at least, they often have an awful level of interest and no-interest free period.

    2. Re:I RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I called my credit card company and asked them to stop sending me those "convenience checks." They said no problem, and I received written confirmation that I was being removed from the mailing list shortly thereafter. Haven't received any more checks since then.

    3. Re:I RTFA by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It could have been that the theif stole his card and then ordered the checks himself...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:I RTFA by Kurt+Gray · · Score: 1

      Amen. Shred everything. Use a cross cut shredder. All credit card companies I've dealt with send those blank checks too, not just Discover.

      From personal experience my wife once had her purse lifted from a restaurant. The thieves charged $2200 of electronics at a store nearby in less than 15 minutes. The local police were called but the cops didn't seem interested in details. The restaurant manager mentioned they might have the crooks on video, the cop didn't care, didn't want to see it. We mentioned we have the name of the store they used the card at just 10 minutes ago. The cop didn't care. "Just fill out this report. Tell your banks to drop the charge and they'll send you knew cards." And that was that. No gratifying foot chases or hard take downs, just sign the report.

    5. Re:I RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1-800-Discover

      that solves your problem right there.

  34. Got to watch hotels.com by (H)elix1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I spend a lot of time on the road, so she audits the hell out of my cards. Turns out there were a couple charges at a local hotel - weird, because it was not anything I would book! Weirder yet when she realized it was her card. My wife's credit card info got swiped at Target.

    Anyhow, the way the scam worked is they booked the room with hotels.com using my bride's card info. They checked in, tried to pay with a card that was expired (or did not work - they were not clear on that). When the hotel attempted to charge for the room service and the time they were there, it defaults to the card used to make the reservation. Card canceled, new one issued, no cost to us - but dang, you really have to watch your statements.

    1. Re:Got to watch hotels.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out there were a couple charges at a local hotel - weird, because it was not anything I would book! Weirder yet when she realized it was her card.

      Sorry to have to tell you this, man, but she was just having a fling with your best friend while you were on the road. She wouldn't have mentioned it, but she thought she was nailing you, then had to cover when she realized that it was her card.

  35. Online Credit Card Use Not Considered Harmful by chezmarshall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on, now.

    Using a credit card online is much safer than using it at any restaurant in which someone takes it out of your sight, using it at a store at which an imprint is taken, or giving its number to someone on the telephone.

    I do all of these, and like the vast majority of everyone else, I've never had a problem.

    Many, if not most, online merchants, don't ever store your credit card number. The exceptions would be those who have a recurring charge capability and those who explicitly have the capability to store it.

    Being aware of the security of your information is fine, but rejecting convenience without adquately weighing the relative risk is damned silly.

    This isn't to say that the original poster doesn't have good practices when it comes to using his credit card at restaurants as well. However, nearly everyone I know who won't use a credit card online will pony it up at a restaurant without a second thought.

    1. Re:Online Credit Card Use Not Considered Harmful by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      Many, if not most, online merchants, don't ever store your credit card number.

      Ever hear of Amazon's 1-Click? That type of thing is getting more common in the online world, too.

      Amazon isn't so obnoxious about it now, but when they first started with 1-Click, it was in-your-face, blatant, obnoxiousness throughout the order process.

  36. congratulations, ovid. by croddy · · Score: 4, Funny
    you got your personal web log linked on the front page of slashdot.

    now go upstairs and help your mom with the dishes.

    1. Re:congratulations, ovid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He lives in the attic, not the basement, you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:congratulations, ovid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  37. A Missing Bit of Info by torrentami · · Score: 1

    The author doesn't mention how they got his credit card info. I wonder if he even knows. I would imagine that since the crooks had one of this credit card checks they probably stole his mail. If so, I wonder if they hang around his house and maybe that's why he recognized one of them. Looks like he's got mail fraud on top of identity theft.

  38. It could have been me. by dallask · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a former scammer and hacker turned security consultant... I have to say that it is surprisingly FREAKING EASY!!! to get someones CC numbers... from social engineering tactics, dumpster diving, or just slight of hand / eye tricks... its possible to get almost anyones card number these days.

    Maybe not a single person as a target mind you, but valid card numbers none the less.

    Once you get the card numbers youll also find that it is stupidly simple to make large purchases with them. Online buys can be made to drop houses for obscurity... and in person purchases can be made with a $300 3M card writer and a good inkjet printer and a bit of photoshop to create a physical card...

    People NEVER verify the card holders name to the ID these days so having the actual card stolen from someone is just about as safe. (When they did attempt to ID me I would claim that I didnt bring my wallet, just the card and they would let me make a $599 purchase at best buy).

    I commend him quick thinking and 'dumb luck' in your of your credit attackers... I have to say that if some people had been as vigilant I may have had their fate.

    On the flip side of the coin, While I once had a stack of 50 valid and working credit cards obtained from one method or another... I now manage and secure online companies from attack and fraud using counter techniques which I used to skirt in MY efforts. I now have access to between 75 and 100K customer's information which Is locked down tighter than Fort Knocks if I do say so myself... not that this makes up for any of my past exploits, but to me, its a way of atoning.

    --
    The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
    1. Re:It could have been me. by bani · · Score: 1

      why did you stop? you get busted or something? how much did you steal and did you ever pay it back?

    2. Re:It could have been me. by XorNand · · Score: 1

      You profited from criminal activity and now you're profited again by helping clean up a racket you helped perpetuate?

      Stop patting yourself on the back, you magnanimus SOB.

      --
      Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    3. Re:It could have been me. by Stalyn · · Score: 1

      kevin mitnick? is that you?

      --
      The best education consists in immunizing people against systematic attempts at education. - Paul Feyerabend
    4. Re:It could have been me. by Alrescha · · Score: 1

      "People NEVER verify the card holders name to the ID these days so having the actual card stolen from someone is just about as safe. (When they did attempt to ID me I would claim that I didnt bring my wallet, just the card and they would let me make a $599 purchase at best buy)."

      In many cases, the contract with the vendor specifically says that they are to validate the signature and nothing else (ie: they are not allowed to demand your id).

      I actually like this policy, it's a lot harder to forge my signature than fake a driver's license :-)

      A.

      --
      ...bringing you cynical quips since 1998
    5. Re:It could have been me. by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Who's the bigger fool

      The dumbass who lets his info be stolen by a bastard like you, or the dumbass who hires a criminal to protect him?

      Since you've cleaned up your life, how many of your 'clients' have had mysterious thefts of their property? huh? Or theft of their customer's information you pretend to be protecting? huh? huh?

      Why else would you brag about having access to so much customer info that is locked down to anyone else?

      Once a theif, always a theif don't bother trying to atone, unless your next effort to atone includes jumping into traffic. One of your 'clients' will catch you one day, and it will be back to jail for you.

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    6. Re:It could have been me. by dallask · · Score: 1

      I stopped when I almost got caught... I made the same mistake most do... I got too cocky and attempted a purchase at the same store twice... by the second time the store owner had caught on.

      Instead of turning me over to the cops, as he probably should have done... he made me pay back the money, in the amount of $800+, and write a formal appology to the owner of the credit card.

      I realized that if I kept that up I would end up in prision... so I swore to myself that I would never attempt that again.

      All total I probably netted a grand total of $10,000 worth of equipment, mostly computer parts, stero equipment, and such.

      But I really must thank the shop keeper for giving the the oppertunity to redeam myself... its not easy for a 18 year old kid with no job to come up with $800 bucks in cash from his own pocket... and I had to sell / pawn many items which I really did care for to pay off that debt... I also had to work for 3 months to buy it all back from the pawn shop... so it was a continueing lesson.

      --
      The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
    7. Re:It could have been me. by dallask · · Score: 0

      First, I was never in jail. Second, it takes a hackere to catch and defend against hackers...

      Which would you perfer?
      A) Someone protecting your data who really knows how its stolen because hes been there and done it... so he KNOWS how to secure it?

      or B)Someone who is reading the same books the crackers and scammers are reading about system security?

      --
      The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
    8. Re:It could have been me. by dallask · · Score: 0

      No, but one of my exploits will be quoted in his new book :)

      --
      The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
    9. Re:It could have been me. by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

      Give us a break!

      Jerks like you have no conscience. You couldnt care less about the people you victimize.

      You stole the $800 to repay the company to keep your ass out of jail, then went on, business as usual victimizing others. No one believes you gave up the taste for easy stolen money. People like you can't leave it alone once you start.

      You are a leech and have no legitimate place in society.

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    10. Re:It could have been me. by dallask · · Score: 1

      However, the real lesson should be spellcheck your slashdot posts :)

      Sorry for that.

      --
      The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
    11. Re:It could have been me. by dallask · · Score: 2, Insightful

      believe what youd like...
      I know what Ive done...
      And I know how to keep others from doing it.. so I may as well put that knowlege to use.

      --
      The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
    12. Re:It could have been me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not that this makes up for any of my past exploits, but to me, its a way of atoning.

      That, and buying yourself new yachts occasionally?

    13. Re:It could have been me. by dallask · · Score: 1

      I should also state that many of my clients know of my past exploits, which extend far beyond those listed here, and choose to hire me BECAUSE of that knowlege.

      --
      The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
    14. Re:It could have been me. by sedmonds · · Score: 1

      It doesn't take a hacker to do so, it takes someone with the same skills and thought processes as a hacker. There's a distinction between those two.

      In the one case, there is a worthless piece of shit who, whether they currently continue to do so or not, engaged in immoral conduct. In the other case, there is someone who may have figured out how to be a worthless piece of shit but chose not to. The second guy is the one I'd want protecting my interests. Why? They have integrity. The second guy is more trustworthy than the first, so C) someone who has the skills to protect me, and the integrity not to put those skills to nefarious use.

    15. Re:It could have been me. by volve · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a testament to the ease of such exploits that you were able to accomplish it all without the obvious use of a dictionary or college education...

      If you'd benefitted from those, you may have been unstoppable.

      Sometimes I weep for the state of our society... :-/

    16. Re:It could have been me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ man, steal a dictionary already.

    17. Re:It could have been me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1. its not easy for a 18 year old kid with no job to come up with $800 bucks in cash from his own pocket... and I had to sell / pawn many items which I really did care for to pay off that debt... I also had to work for 3 months to buy it all back from the pawn shop... so it was a continueing lesson.
      I wish you had been locked up. It's clear you learned nothing except that you are too cowardly to really face the consrquences of your crimes. You pawn a bunch of stolen equipment to buy off your victim (who upsets me almost as much as you) and then whine that you had to work for 3 months to buy it back!

      People like you make me sick.
    18. Re:It could have been me. by sedmonds · · Score: 1
      All total I probably netted a grand total of $10,000 worth of equipment, mostly computer parts, stero equipment, and such.


      So we're supposed to believe you're reformed, even though you kept the stolen goods you weren't coerced into returning? You didn't redeem yourself, you are not a hero. You're a common criminal.
    19. Re:It could have been me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like putting a paedophile to work at a day care centre because he has "experience" with youngsters.

    20. Re:It could have been me. by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Thank God for mind-readers like you, sir. Perhaps next you could look into Mrs. Schiavo's mind and let everyone know what's going on in there. Thank you.

    21. Re:It could have been me. by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 4, Interesting
      People NEVER verify the card holders name to the ID these days so having the actual card stolen from someone is just about as safe.

      I seem to have stumbled upon a way to make every clerk ask me for ID, every time. I wrote on the back of my card in permanent marker, "ASK TO SEE ID." The first few times cashiers asked to see my ID, I was actually rather snotty about it, like they were wasting my time. Then I remembered what I had written and that it was working. I was stunned.

      There is a small fallout though -- although 99% of my transactions over the past year have been really nice, I got one last week at Barnes & Noble that was just completely uncomfortable. The lady at the register saw the back of my card, took a hardass stance and assumed I was a criminal. She said (loud enough for the other customers to look up and stare), "Excuse me sir, could I have your name?" I told her my name. Then even louder she said, "UH HUH. RIGHT. WELL 'MR. BOYD' YOU'RE GOING TO NEED TO SHOW ME SOME ID." Then, apparently disappointed that I actually had confirming ID, she muttered quietly, "well sir everything appears to be in order. Just doing as instructed." Oh well. At least she asked. If it had been a card thief, she probably would have leapt across the counter to make a citizen's arrest while she shouted "COVER ME!" to her coworker.

    22. Re:It could have been me. by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ive been watching this thread, and it seems to me you're the common ilk that does these very "exploits".

      Anybody can double-scan a CC. Hell, I even made a card-scanner/rewriter from casette parts. Didnt work very well, but it worked. I can also copy down 20 digit numbers, just like everybody else.

      And really, I do know how simple it is to "rip CC #'s off". Thats what the script kiddies usually start at. Seems you just ended at that point, which says a whole lot about yourself.

      And no, I dont need to talk about me. Im not the one with the over-inflated ego to brag on Slashdot.

      Sad, sad, sad.

      --
    23. Re:It could have been me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even Mitnick got the chance to come clean and enter the security sector...

    24. Re:It could have been me. by AEton · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the topic of credit card signatures:
      I like Shamu.

      (Spoiler: Circuit City gets it right at the end)

      --
      We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    25. Re:It could have been me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of you fuckers act like you've never done ANYTHING wrong in life.

      Get a clue. The guy is doing something he's good at, and he's not harming anyone now. Can someone just get on with their life without being branded a thief all their life?

      Guess not.

    26. Re:It could have been me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had to pawn off basically stolen merchandise and work for a whole three months to get it back... Tough punishment.

      </sarcasm>

      Serioudly, it's great that you apparently turned your life around, but working for three short months isn't much of a "continuing lesson." Hell, it's barely any punishment at all for your crimes. Now, if you'd returned the $9,200 in stuff you didn't get caught for stealing... (although I'm sure it was too late to get a refund+chargeback on most of the stuff)

    27. Re:It could have been me. by hankwang · · Score: 1
      People NEVER verify the card holders name to the ID these days

      But ask yourself: why is that? The card issuer could easily require shopkeepers to have the customer enter a PIN or show an ID. To prove that the ID was checked, the shopkeeper has to write down the registration number of the ID. This is how it works in Sweden. In Netherlands, people rarely use credit cards, but rather debit cards which can only be used with a PIN. A fraudster would either need to see the card owner enter the PIN and steal the card, or install a fake cardreader somewhere. The result: card fraud is very rare.

      (As an aside, to obtain a photo ID in Sweden, you need to show up at a bank or post office with a witness, and both of you need to show a document that is sent to your registered home address, plus other proof about your identities. It's pretty hard to steal someone's identity that way)

      Anyway, the problem is that if one CC company is the first to require merchants to take precautions, every customer will hate them for the extra fuss. The customer won't feel in his wallet that the CC company only takes 0.5% (administrative fees) instead of 5% (covering fraud) from every transactions, because it is the shopkeeper who has to bear those fees.

    28. Re:It could have been me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's what kind of scary. I worked at a retail store last summer, which of course included behind the register. I was given absolutely zero information on what to do with credit card purchases apart from "swipe here". I wound up doing what I would want people to do were I the purchaser, which included asking for ID when the signature was blank or too faded to read.

      Many people were surprised and thankful that I went to the trouble of doing that, and more than once I had someone borrow a pen to re-sign the card (yes, I had verified the ID.. :) This indicated, to me, that no one had done similar checks recently.

    29. Re:It could have been me. by swillden · · Score: 1

      in person purchases can be made with a $300 3M card writer and a good inkjet printer and a bit of photoshop to create a physical card...

      How did you get hold of the CVV2 to write onto the magstripe?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    30. Re:It could have been me. by swillden · · Score: 1

      I seem to have stumbled upon a way to make every clerk ask me for ID, every time. I wrote on the back of my card in permanent marker, "ASK TO SEE ID."

      Not a bad idea (I've done it for several years), but this doesn't have any effect on the types of attacks previous poster was talking about. It only helps when you lose your card.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    31. Re:It could have been me. by dallask · · Score: 1

      in the early days of CVV, none of the retailers ever validated the card with the cvv. Even these days most POS Systems dont take the cvv into concideration because the physical card is present.

      its more used for online transactions to validate that you have the card in hand... but if that e-tailor has an insecure system, and stores CC Data unencrypted in their DB... and you can hack it... well, its all a mess.

      This is what I do now, secure these systems.

      --
      The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
    32. Re:It could have been me. by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

      Obviously you've never been the victim of one of these pieces of shit.

      Do you think he ever repaid the other 10grand+ he's admitted to stealing?

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    33. Re:It could have been me. by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1

      You're still a worthless piece o shit.

      You victimized people, and now profit supposedly legitimately from what you learned by the victimization of those people.

      You should do the world a favour and jump into traffic.

      There is no other atonement.

      There is no honour among theives. You are and always shall be worthless.

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    34. Re:It could have been me. by dallask · · Score: 1

      to each his own opinion.

      --
      The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
    35. Re:It could have been me. by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1


      which just proves my point.

      you have no conscience.

      you never cared for how you hurt others. It was the threat to yourself that supposedly cleaned you up, not any type of quilt or remorse for the victimization of others.

      and you use the damage you caused to make money now when really you should be bending over and taking some fine victimization of your own to feel.

      And you really think people consider you to be running a reputable business?

      Come on! Prove it!

      Start some advertising here! ... What's your business name? Who are these suckers ... errr clients you pretend to be protecting? Let your record be public for all to see.

      --
      George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    36. Re:It could have been me. by swillden · · Score: 1

      I asked about CVV2, not CVV. The CVV2 is on the magnetic stripe, not printed on the card.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    37. Re:It could have been me. by swillden · · Score: 1

      Sorry, reverse that. I've confused myself. CVV is on the magstripe, CVV2 is printed on the plastic. POS systems do not and never did validate the CVV, but they do (and have for some time) passed it to the back end system for validation. The purpose of the CVV is to provide a data element which (weakly) proves card presence.

      So, my question is: When you were scamming people's card numbers and creating fake cards, how did you get the CVV? Generally, to create a usable fake card, you need to actually read the magstripe of the real card.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    38. Re:It could have been me. by dallask · · Score: 1

      My mistake,

      In some cases I had the actual card swiped on a reader which captured all the information from the card and which I could dump to the computer for printing on a physical card. Theirs not much you can do about some kid at a restaurant with a palm reader...

      but again, some vendors didnt even validate the EXP date when processing the card... or would simply pass the card number and exp to the gateway...

      I actually found one vendor who only validated (to the best of my knowledge) that the CC number was a valid number FORMAT... allowing me to create my own CC number with a reverse mod10 algorithm and create a card... I suppose they simply validated the number and ran the batch at the end of the day manually...

      --
      The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
  39. Authories don't care about this crime at all... by wernst · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I commend this fellow. I wish I had similar luck in the past...

    Last year Wells Fargo calls me. It seems some doofus used my Wells Fargo Mastercard to buy, among other things, $1000 in Victoria's Secret gift certificates from the VS Website. The expriation date was wrong, and the transaction flagged. Wells Fargo did NOT authorize the purchase, and I wasn't billed. (Other smaller purchases, under $50, had been authorized earlier in the day, but they were now being charged back since I said I didn't make them.) Bravo to Wells Fargo for being diligent about this.

    Of course, I want to catch these shitheats. Victoria's Secret has their shipping address, so I think it should be pretty easy to get that address, call the police, and have justice done.

    WRONGO!!

    I call Victorias Secret. They say they can only give the shipping address out to a police officer/detective conducting an investigation, or at the request of the Credit Card company (Wells Fargo.). OK. Fine. They don't want vigilantes.

    I call local PD. They say that since I didn't lose any money (WF blocked or refunded all charges) there was no crime for them to persue. If anyone lost money, Wells Fargo did. Call them and have them call police.

    I call Wells Fargo. They say THEY didn't lose any money; they cancelled or blocked the charges. If anyone lost anything of value, it is Victorias Secret for (apparently) shipping out the gift certificates immediately without a valid payment now, or a valid expiration date eariler. They would need to call the Police to start an investigation.

    "But I just called them! They don't care about who did this. They sent me to the local PD, and they sent me to you," I say. "I just want to know who did this. They have an address, but they'll only issue it to you or the PD."

    The conversation took TWO more laps around these three parties before I gave up.

    The story linked to in this post gives basically the same story in the sense that the local PD didn't give a shit about this crime in terms of investing ANY investigational effort. It was up to the poor victim to do all the legwork, and even THEN, the police seem like they take their sweet time getting there to catch the jerk-off criminals.

    I bet the local DA pleads them down to nothing without a trial too.

    In short, it seems that only determined application of stupidity on the part of credit card theives, along with an angry, lucky, motivated victom working hard at finding the theif, is the ONLY way these shitheads will ever get caught.

    I don't even know why I work for a living...

    1. Re:Authories don't care about this crime at all... by bani · · Score: 1

      file a small claims against the police or VS. attempted robbery is still a crime.

    2. Re:Authories don't care about this crime at all... by ebrandsberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, they have them on several issues, including drug charges, probably laundering, and other charges in addition to the identity theft. It was the ID theft that got them busted, but by tacking on the other stuff, they will probably get jail time. We also don't know if there were other ID's stolen, which it sounds like they had given the repeat visits to the same hotel (probably on another ID).

    3. Re:Authories don't care about this crime at all... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      It's not robbery, but I do enjoy all the law experts posting on Slashdot lately.

    4. Re:Authories don't care about this crime at all... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      The story linked to in this post gives basically the same story in the sense that the local PD didn't give a shit about this crime in terms of investing ANY investigational effort.


      Here we have an actual crime more or less solved and thrown in their lap. I guess they're too busy sitting on the side of the freeway or busting people for pot...

    5. Re:Authories don't care about this crime at all... by damsa · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think his point was the attempted crimes is a crime in it self even if no one got hurt. Or crimes in the planning stages can be considered conspiracy. Robbery is taking of something by the use of force. Fraud is taking of something by misrepresentation. Thus in this case it's fraud, not robbery.

    6. Re:Authories don't care about this crime at all... by zx75 · · Score: 1

      Well, in your case it probably really was more effort than it was worth. Nobody lost any money, there was an unsuccessful attempt at fraud, and thus no evidence of any serious crime.

      At best, if the cops had followed up on it, gotten a warrent for search and seizure they might have found evidence for other fraud crimes, but it is just as likely to be a crime of opportunity and yours was the only card stolen.

      As much as I agree with you that ideally all such cases should be followed and prosecuted, and as much as I dislike people who do that sort of thing, I understand the reality that it isn't practical or worthwhile to do so.

      I've seen more than a few 'the police wouldn't do anything!' type stories, and so far yours is the most mundane, the least likely anyone would have been punished even if they were caught.

      --
      This is not a sig.
    7. Re:Authories don't care about this crime at all... by clambake · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The conversation took TWO more laps around these three parties before I gave up.

      You think that was fun? How about this...

      Sombody charged my card AND changes the address for getting statements. Since I had not used the card in like two years, statements had stopped coming (a FEATURE!). So, I never learned about the fraud (or the supsequent, desperate pleas for payment, or the harassing phone calls from the collections agency...)

      Eventually the credit had been sold around to two or three credit agencies and one of them decided to actually look up my address instead of just using the last one used by the credit card company. At this time, I learned about the fraud and started taking steps to get it resolved.

      The credit agency, on learning about the fraud, promptly sold the debt as quick as they could (so they don't have to eat the cost), and by the time I got my act together, it had already changed hands.

      Now I had a new set of people calling me, bitching about money. So I explained the situation to them, and ONCE AGAIN, they sold the credit as quick as they could.

      This kept happening, I belive about 15 times, before I just stopped getting calls from people. Even now I'm not sure what the situation is...

    8. Re:Authories don't care about this crime at all... by Morgon · · Score: 1

      Check your credit report! I don't know if you ever want to have another car, house, or card again - but one thing's for sure - get that report and make sure everything's as accurate as possible.

      --
      [DISCLAIMER: This post is a work of satire and should not be misconstrued as a holy text upon which to base a religion.]
    9. Re:Authories don't care about this crime at all... by DustMagnet · · Score: 1
      they will probably get jail time.

      I doubt it, unless they already have a record. If Ovid wants to see them in jail, he'd better contact the DA and make sure they don't take the easy road and just give them a plea bargain for probation. We need more people like him.

      I really hope Ovid follows this through and we get another Slashdot article after the trial/plea.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
  40. The first fact about identity theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The person whose identity was stolen will have a lot of bad credit attached to his or her credit report. Subsequently there may be notes attached that it wasn't really him. But the automated programs which are responsible for figuring out whether you're a good credit risk are a lot better at figuring out the former than the latter.

    Therefore, even though your money was not stolen, your credit still winds up trashed.

    I hope you weren't planning on buying a house...

    1. Re:The first fact about identity theft by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0

      I hope you weren't planning on buying a house...

      Actually I'm in the process right now, so I know how easy it is to get false reports off your credit report.

      And to call this idenity theft is quite a stretch. It's just a stolen credit card. Having your credit card stolen and a couple thousand racked up on it, with it all reported within 30 days, that isn't going to even be mentioned on your credit report. Have you ever disputed a charge on your credit card before? I have, and there's no mention of it on my credit report (and no, I didn't have to pay).

    2. Re:The first fact about identity theft by loupgarou21 · · Score: 1

      now see, this just means that he would be lazy to let something like this ruin his credit report, with a little bit of persistance you can convince the credit reporting agencies to change your credit report if there is a mistake on it (and anything on the report resulting from this would be a mistake)

    3. Re:The first fact about identity theft by GWTPict · · Score: 1
      Of course you didn't have to pay, it's a well known fact that that fraud has absolutely no effect on the cost of credit.

      Please note, the sentence above is sarcastic. I wouldn't normally feel the need to point this out but with your obviously shakey grasp of reality I felt it might help in this instance.

    4. Re:The first fact about identity theft by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Of course you didn't have to pay, it's a well known fact that that fraud has absolutely no effect on the cost of credit.

      You are assuming I have credit card debt with Discover Card. Actually, I do, but it's at 0%. And since this incident, it hasn't gone up.

  41. AWESOME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read reading...you did well, congrats

  42. not hard at all by bani · · Score: 1

    when you know the punishment they will receive is worse than you could ever personally inflict. you know, pound-in-the-ass prison and all that.

  43. What I want to know... by unladen+swallow · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is what type of person steals 2 credit cards, racks up thousands of dollars in charges. Then proceeds to order breakfast from Denney's? Come on the meal is free live it up a little.

    1. Re:What I want to know... by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

      Because Denny's was OPEN at 6am.

    2. Re:What I want to know... by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      you did read the bit about the needles right? junkies dont care what they eat, its not like anything tastes bad when you are high...or so ive heard...

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  44. They were - and from you by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    If you were smart you'd be worked up too. Because it's people who are stealing money like that that make busienss costs higher (when they have to pay back the credit card companies for fraudulent charges they have to make it up somehow).

    Do you enjoy paying a "criminal tax" to keep some lazy bastard in a life of luxury? Because that's what your doing right now every time you buy something from somewhere that takes credit cards. Hopefully someone finds your CC number someday so you, too, can find just how unimportant the whole matter is.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:They were - and from you by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      Because it's people who are stealing money like that that make busienss costs higher (when they have to pay back the credit card companies for fraudulent charges they have to make it up somehow).

      If you care about the miniscule amount of money that these businesses lose to credit card fraud, you wouldn't use a business which takes credit cards in the first place, since they're paying something like 2-3% for every single credit card transaction.

      Do you enjoy paying a "criminal tax" to keep some lazy bastard in a life of luxury? Because that's what your doing right now every time you buy something from somewhere that takes credit cards.

      That's why I use my paypal debit card, which pays me 1% on every "credit card" purchase I make. 1% is much higher than the criminal tax. 1 out of 100 purchases are not fraudulent (certainly not at a business like Denny's or a hotel, anyway).

      Hopefully someone finds your CC number someday so you, too, can find just how unimportant the whole matter is.

      I hope so too. Screw the credit card companies. I'd rather a petty thief has the money.

  45. Re:Canada: Venue is everything... by quarkscat · · Score: 1

    I would say that those RCMPs are great!

    Unfortunately, most of the credit card holders,
    and users, are south of the northern border.
    Population differences (32 VS 375 Million)
    also make a big difference. ID theft is so
    very popular here in the USA just because it
    is so easy to get away with: first the criminal
    has to be caught, then the criminal has to be
    prosecuted, and then the criminal has to be
    convicted, and then the punishment has to be
    adequate to deter such criminal activity.

    Figures for the number of illegal aliens in the
    USA range from 8 million (official figures that
    have been massaged by political correctness) to
    an estimated 28 million, based upon percentage
    captured. Imagine a Canada whose population
    were to double within a decade not being noticed.

    Even the 8 million (low-ball) figure for illegal
    aliens in the USA puts a severe strain on the
    social safety net, and on crime fighting. Those
    who have been able to successfully remain within
    the USA the longest have done so by using the
    best false identities, or backed up with the
    help of government officials (at every level of
    government).

    It has only been post 9-11-2001 that pressure has
    been applied to law enforcement and prosecutors
    to actually enforce the law. It doesn't help
    that the POTUS is the poster child for amnesty
    for illegal aliens in the USA. So the taxpayers
    of America are subjected to SS employees that
    sell lists of SS numbers to the highest bidder,
    DMV employees that earn an extra 2 to 5 thousand
    USD per month under the table by creating good
    IDs from bad basic documents, and everyone with
    a computer, a scanner, and a laser color printer
    tempted to suppliment their income by becoming
    a fake ID provider.

    Having CC companies monitoring "unusual" usage
    of CC isn't enough by far. The punishment should
    fit the crime, which in this case should be 2
    years of hard (breaking big rocks into gravel)
    labor PER INCIDENT. Even this penalty is less
    that what I would impose (, so I guess it's a
    good thing that I am not the judge in court.)

  46. wow, he's so secure! by GISGEOLOGYGEEK · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Come on!

    'I rarely use my credit card online'

    Like that matters in any way!

    Why do so many people think online transactions are any less secure than any other kind of transaction?

    Every time you use a card to order a pizza you are giving your name, card number and expirely date to some kid who may be in some gang for all you know, any time you use a card in a store the clerk could be double swiping it to copy the card info electronically or just copying the receipt information. Remember that time you didnt get your monthly bill? Surprise, some bastard stole your mail and has the card info.

    Stop it already! If you use a credit card, you could have the info stolen, period!

    --
    George Bush + Linux = "I will not let information get in the way of the fight against Windows"
    1. Re:wow, he's so secure! by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

      In fact, they were local. You are more likely (by FAR) to have your CC numbers stolen by someone you hand your card to then online, it's a proven fact.

    2. Re:wow, he's so secure! by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "Every time you use a card to order a pizza you are giving your name, card number and expirely date to some kid who may be in some gang for all you know"

      I think gang members are too busy selling drugs for thousands of dollars to deliver pizza at $5/hour.

    3. Re:wow, he's so secure! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      You don't even NEED a credit card for someone to commit credit card fraud in your name. If they steal your identifying information they can sign up for a credit card in your name on your credit record, and you won't know until you do a credit check on yourself. They are free in Canada if done by mail, you fill out a form and mail it in to Equifax or another place.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  47. seems kind of brave by Pinefresh · · Score: 1

    slashdotting your LJ

    1. Re:seems kind of brave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt he will ever hear a single word about it. Before this article I had never even heard about LiveJournal... If I owned LiveJournal I would be LOOKING for ways to get my site mentioned on Slashdot. All advertisements costs money, this one just came in the form of bandwidth.

  48. SHAMELESSLY PLAGIARIZED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shamelessly plagiarized.

    Mod this idiot down!

    http://www.livejournal.com/users/publius_ovidius /1 11672.html?page=2#comments

  49. tracking down fraud... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it's always good to hear someone tracking down their own criminals like this story. this is a prime case of "vigilante justice" being very appropriate - especially given that the police were reluctant to get involved _at_all_ until he had confirmed that both perps were in the building.

    on a tangent ... i had a small online company try to defraud me last fall and tracked down the owner much the same. they wouldn't return phone calls or emails, so i took it into my own hands. through some dns whois queries, mapquest searches, reverse phone lookups and the like (all free, btw, because who wants to pay $40 just to have someone take all your fun :) and do it for you?) the short version is that i called his home phone number, then confirmed he was the owner of this particular business before railing on him for his poor service and demanding a full refund (which i received quickly thereafter). man, was this guy sure scared/surprised to get a call at his home number.

    moral of the story: i can relate the the ecstacy this guy must have felt when knowing you've had a hand in the takedown of someone who's done you wrong. i strongly recommend the experience to all /.ers who have such an "opportunity."

  50. Syringes... (and protection) by droopus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well done man, but the syringe portion gave me a chill. The syringe part is more than just evidence...what the cop did was both illegal and insanely dangerous. "Sharps" are considered hazardous medical waste and in every state MUST be disposed of in a proper labeled container (NOT a Coke bottle.) They must be given to a company licensed to dispose of hazardous or medical waste and destroyed, usually in these massive incinerators. (I was a med student once...)

    Ironic as this sounds, what the cop did with those sharps (syringes) was more dangerous than your identity theft. Most likely, the manager chucked the bottle in the trash, and those needles are possibly now being reused by some dumpster diving junkie. Who knows what viruses, bacteria, whatnot those kids had lurking in their blood.

    I'm insanely proud of your victory but I gently suggest calling the Red Lion, and TELL them that 'dirty needles' are somewhere in their trash. Two asshole identity theives in jail is small change compared to a trash collector or Red Lion employee getting Lyme, AIDS or septicemia, and spreading it to his family.

    Also, those guys know who you are, are obvious heavy druggies and probably don't like you very much right now. They'll be out one day. Consider a pistol permit. I ALWAYS carry, and that's saved my life twice. Get some professional training , and practice every week, too. My close scrapes: Three guys went at me with crowbars (carjacking attempt in a parking lot...liked my M3) and their eyes got as large as frisbees when in under half a second they saw the business end of my Les Baer .45. Never had to fire a shot, but I was absolutely ready to drop all three of them and they knew it. The other time I just opened my vest to a knife wielding mugger, we both smiled and he ran off like Carl Lewis doing the 100. Protect yourself!

    --
    "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    1. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, where do you live where you have such problems?!

    2. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by smashin234 · · Score: 2, Informative

      """Well done man, but the syringe portion gave me a chill. The syringe part is more than just evidence...what the cop did was both illegal and insanely dangerous. "Sharps" are considered hazardous medical waste and in every state MUST be disposed of in a proper labeled container (NOT a Coke bottle.) They must be given to a company licensed to dispose of hazardous or medical waste and destroyed, usually in these massive incinerators. (I was a med student once...)""" At the bottom of the article, the guy says that it turned out that the hotel had the proper facility to dispose of the needles. However, even if they didn't, wouldn't it be ironic if: Some criminal roots through the hotels trash looking for information to steal someone's identity with and gets needled?

    3. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      The other time I just opened my vest to a knife wielding mugger, we both smiled and he ran off like Carl Lewis doing the 100.

      Hence the saying, "Always bring a gun to a knife fight."

    4. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I don't know how it is where you live, but around here criminals tend to carry guns also. Just the other day someone was shot several times when they went for their gun during a carjacking attempt.

      Also, think about the crap that will be added to your own life if you actually have to shoot someone. And I'm talking about the legal crap, not the moral side. If you think someone gets mad for putting them in jail, think of how their fellow criminals will feel about you for killing or wounding one of their own. Yeah.

      It's a tough road. I certainly don't have the answers. I have long considered carrying, but I have not been able to come to terms on dealing with the aftermath.

    5. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by pi_rules · · Score: 1

      The parent is certainly right. They've got your name, address, and are apparently aware that you've got decent credit -- which probably means you've got some valuable loot. Heck, it doesn't even have to be valuable -- they just know you've got a real job and therefore real posessions.

      Carry? Certainly... everybody should seriously think about it.

      However, unless they're stalking you and looking for a good time to jump you (lot of work for druggies... and you've got more stuff inside your house than on your person I bet) they'd be more likely to return to your residence for a robbery or whatever else they have in mind.

      Beef up the locks, maybe get a security system, etc. Dogs are nice too if that's doable for you.

      Pistols are great for times when you cannot get your hands on a long-gun -- but having a nice shotgun handy when you're home is pretty much the Swiss Army Tool of long guns. No matter where you live (apartment, urban house, rural house) a good shotgun can be tailored to your needs with proper selection of shells (ammunition).

      Get training that not only covers the manual of arms but the legality portions too. You probably already KNOW when those circumstances occur naturally, but it's good to have it on paper that you were educated on the laws.

      But.. before you get too into it I'd suggest you just find somebody that you know who can take you shooting and show you how various firearms works. Again, I'd prefer you study up on a shotgun for home and a pistol for home/away. If you don't know anybody you can email me.. I can probably point you in the right direction to somebody in your area that'll show you. Personally anytime somebody is seroiously considering something like that I'l take them out to a range on my dime and let them have at it with various firearms, free. Shooters are just that way it seems.

      Shotguns are generally fairly inexpensive. A good Mossberg 500 pump-action can be had from WalMart for around $200 depending on the configuration. A VERY simple firearm to operate... but even simpler is a break-open double-barrled shotgun. I nabbed one for $300 brand new the other week. A Baikal (Russian made) 12 gauge side-by-side with a 20" barrel. Handy little sucker!

      Given the choice between an AK-47 clone and a 30 round magazine and a pump shotgun in 12 gauge with 5 shots you wanna know which one sits by my bed? The shotgun. Hands down.

    6. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The other time I just opened my vest to a knife wielding mugger, we both smiled and he ran off like Carl Lewis doing the 100.

      Be careful there. If he had run at you, you'd have been in a world of hurt unless you are the fastest draw in the West. It's easy to underestimate the time it takes you to be ready to fire or overestimate the time it takes someone to reach you.

    7. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > It's a tough road. I certainly don't have the answers. I have long considered carrying, but I have not been able to come to terms on dealing with the aftermath.

      I'll jump in here.

      *shrug*. To me, property rights are human rights. Property is life -- you can never get back the hours you worked for your boss in order to purchase your car, for instance. And it's pretty hard to insure the contents in your wallet. I see no moral problem with the use of lethal force to defend life or property. In most jurisdictions, lethal force is permitted only to defend life, but where the law permits it, I would be willing to use lethal force to defend my property from unlawful seizure, whether that property be the $50000 Boxter acquired through years of hard work and conscientious, or the after-tax $50 in my wallet I acquired last Tuesday and that I spent on a case of really good microbrew and a Chicago-style pizza tonight.

      If I lived in a jurisdiction that acknowledged the right to carry, I would choose to carry, and if I ever had to fire on a human (and assuming the civil or criminal courts agreed with my reasons for pulling the trigger, for I believe that law, by necessity, trumps morality), would sleep soundly knowing that I'd made the right decision.

      That cuts both ways. If you're not prepared to deal with the potential consequences of carrying; if you value someone else's right to life over your right to property (or even - as extreme pacifists sometimes do - your right to your own life), then choosing not to carry on that basis is every bit as correct a decision.

    8. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus · · Score: 1

      Be careful there. If he had run at you, you'd have been in a world of hurt unless you are the fastest draw in the West. It's easy to underestimate the time it takes you to be ready to fire or overestimate the time it takes someone to reach you.

      Well said, and I absolutely agree. Too many people think a gun is a magic device you drop in your pocket, and one sunny day when threatened, they can draw, fire and the "bad man will go away." BULLSHIT.

      I have taken many HUNDREDS of hours of training, am a Three Weapon Master, a Distinguished Graduate of ASAA (Advanced Level), and a Graduate of the toughest level at Blackwater (Tactical Pistol II). I was the only civilian in a class of SWAT and Military Special Ops personnel and finished in the top 20%. I am repeating the course for fun in May. (How sick is that?)

      My fastest time on the ASAA "Nutcracker" was 2 center hits on 4 sillouette targets at 5 meters in 1.6 seconds. That's from holster under a concealing vest, .45 ACP. And that was with Ranger Talons. My usual time is 1.7-1.8 secs. Fast enough? B) Against one guy, it would all be over in less than half a second...probably less, I already had the vest open.

      But I know I'm unusual. Most people don't train for shit and it infuriates me. Your advice is extremely sound. It's all about the practice and training. If you don't have it, your scenario is right on the money.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    9. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, where do you live where you have such problems?!


      Heheh good question. Nowhere particularly dangerous, but it's my line of work that brings on the threats.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    10. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by trawg · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm guessing either Iraq, or the USA

    11. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus · · Score: 1

      It's a tough road. I certainly don't have the answers. I have long considered carrying, but I have not been able to come to terms on dealing with the aftermath.

      As did I. May I suggest you read Massad Ayoob's book "In the Gravest Extreme" where he talks about the implications of carrying and using firearms in concert with the LAW and your own conscience. It's a serious subject, but Mass makes great sense. One of the great thoughtful gun books ever written.

      Me? I may be well trained and I know I am well armed but I hope I die in many years, never having had to fire a single shot at another living being. (I am NOT a hunter.)

      But I am protecting my family to the best possible extreme. NO ONE fucks with my family.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    12. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      The other time I just opened my vest

      Consider not wearing a vest in public to discourage attackers.

    13. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And once everyone is armed like you, muggers will shoot at us from a distance and take the money off our dead bodies. Thanks for making the world safer.

    14. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between an AK-47 clone and a 30 round magazine and a pump shotgun in 12 gauge with 5 shots you wanna know which one sits by my bed? The shotgun. Hands down.

      You got it man. Under my bed? Winchester 1300 SWAT model, folding stock, 18" bbl, 8 shot, loaded with 00 Buck, with an M3 Tac light on it, attached to a sling bandolier with 12 more 00 Bucks and 6 rifled slugs for the obstinate types.

      Plus a gun trained 180 pound bloodhound (Flop) who can smell a non-familiar person half a mile away.

      Did you know FN makes those Winchesters now? Identical to their own...half the price. Got an FN Five Seven too, in my collection if I really want to have some fun at the range.

      You might like this site. I got a case of 200 of these downstairs all ready for spring. A single 1 pound target will blow a van to bits.

      And women too. My wife carries a Glock 27 (.40 S&W) and is probably a better shot than I am. (Well maaaaaaybe....)

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    15. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope, property theft is NO legal justification for deadly force in any state. The VERY strict rule is, you can only use deadly force when you, or your family (and in some states, third parties, are in danger of deadly force.

      Infuriating as it is, that's the law. If you come downstairs in the middle of the night, and find an unarmed man stealing your stereo, you CANNOT shoot him. He literally can announce his intention to leave, and do so. Now, that doesn't mean, you can't break his leg with the baseball bat you have in your hand, but if you shoot him, you go to jail, my friend.

      You may hold him at gunpoint for the police but if he knows the law and is unarmed, he can stand up and walk right out your front door. Also, if the deadly threat is not inside your home you MUST attempt retreat unless he raises his weapon to fire.

      Lotta laws and you have to know them cold. It's a huge responsibility and anyone not willing to accept that responsibility has no business with a firearm.

      Sucks, eh?

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    16. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      Mr. Droopus:

      6 rifled slugs for the obstinate types

      I can see using the shotgun for home defense but with the slugs, do you have to be concerned about the slugs passing through walls in the event you miss?

      In an urban setting, wouldn't a slug go through your walls and possibly through the walls of your neighbor's house?

      Maybe I'm overestimating the range of a slug coming from a shotgun barrel. I've only hunted with shotguns using "normal" shotshells or rifles (30-06, 30-30). Never fired a shotgun containing a slug.

      In a home defense situation, it would seem like you would want a weapon that wouldn't go through your neighbor's house, his neighbor's house and the house after that. I'd never depend on a rifle for home defense because if I did not hit my target, the bullet wouldn't stop until it had passed through quite a few walls.

      How does the slug (or your wife's sidearm) handle passing through walls (conventional drywall, not bricks or poured walls)?

      Thanks, -s

    17. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      And once everyone is armed like you, muggers will shoot at us from a distance and take the money off our dead bodies. Thanks for making the world safer.

      No...if everyone was armed, muggers would think twice about even pulling out a weapon. Also, muggers are not trained snipers. When you say "at a distance", muggers are not going to hide behind trees 50 yds away and put two in your forehead before emptying your wallet.

      Most muggers probably couldn't hit a person more than 25 feet away. Too many TV shows where people hold handguns horizontal and/or fire from the hip.

      The other cool part of everyone being armed is that a mugger doesn't know that you are a fairy coward afriad of carrying a weapon. So, even if you don't want to carry, the criminal doesn't know that and he won't mess with you. You get the benefits of owning a gun without ever buying one.

      -s

    18. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus · · Score: 1

      Ah penetration....boy have I studied that, pondered that and sought the opinions of experts. Here's my take.

      Ok, we start small...9mm. Low penetration? Not on your life. A regular ball 9mm (about 1200 fps) will zip through sheetrock, metal car rims, and 2 or 3 people, leaving a very small wound trail. A JHP (hollowpoint) MAY expand properly and reduce that expansion, but it might not. I sometimes carry an HK P7 9MM loaded with Talons, but ball 9mm? That's range ammo for me.

      Ok up a bit..say, my wife's Glock 27 (.40 S&W about 800 fps, but way more delivered energy.) Nice carry ammo, less penetration to worry about, very accurate, but again, JHP only. My wife carries Magsafes, a VERY high power frangible JHP with a poured resin center. Expensive as hell, not practice ammo, but it would not penetrate thick sheetrock. Powerful little bastards, and I would hate to be on the other side of one. I use the .45 version too.

      Up to .45 ACP, what I usually carry almost always, either in my Les Baer 1911 or Colt Lightweight Commander. Again, magsafes but with one slight difference. Since I carry Condition One (cocked and locked) the round in the chamber is usually a CCI Shotshell. Actually they're pretty crappy, but basically they are tiny .45 shotgun shells with 210 tiny pellets. I do not want to kill anyone, I want to stop their aggression IMMEDIATELY. If they die, they brought it upon themselves. At 25 meters the shotshell will absolutely make a cardboard target look like swiss cheese, but even if I shot the guy in the face, the wounds would be minor and I have a feeling he might change his mind about attacking me. If he doesn't, 8 +P Magsafes, Gold Dots or Golden Sabres are right behind and he gets two to the chest and one to the head in under a second. I think that will prevent any further danger. My aim is to STOP him, not kill him.

      Ok to your question of longer arms...you are absolutely right about NEVER using a hunting rifle in your house for self defense. You are absolutely right about extreme penetration, you have little maneuvering room and the roar of a rifle (as you must well know) will be devastating to all, including you.

      Yes, my shotgun is loaded with 00 Buck, and the slugs are on the bandolier. It's much shorter than your rifle, and yes, the 00 Buck would penetrate sheetrock like butter. Luckily, I live in the woods, and no houses are in the line of fire beyond mine. But if I had to use a slug on a drugged out psycho already pumped full of 00 Buck (not very likely) I would probably go for a single head shot, and as a hunter, I probably don't need to explain what that would look like. As for penetration, slugs will penetrate sheetrock just as easily (if not more so) than 00 Buck, which is why I suggest, unless you REALLY have been well trained, use birdshot for home defense shotgun use, especially in an urban or suburban setting.

      Hehe...I can imagine the horrified faces of all the Euro antigunners at this post.

      Peace, scotty. Let's hope we never have to use this training.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    19. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus · · Score: 1

      Um, this is a not a dress vest I'm discussing, it's a khaki (or black) shooting vest designed to provide concealment. If I wasn't wearing the vest, I would be carrying unconcealed and would lose my permit in a second.

      Carrying concealed means concealed. If my gun "prints" (shows its shape through my garment), I am violating the law, and again, could lose my permit. It can be a real PITA in public, especially in supermarkets or stores where I might reach for something, so if I must, one hand goes on the outside of the concealing garment to keep it in place always. If my gun becomes exposed, I'm in violation of the law, simple as that. That's in my state. I think there are a few states where you may carry unconcealed, but I'm not sure of the circumstances. Packing.org would have those laws if you were interested.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    20. Re:Syringes... (and protection) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey troll-boy,

      I'd guess that droopus is a LEO or a PI. I retired from 32 years as a LEO. The first 7 in narcotics. Gawd-Damned straight I still carry a sidearm. When I got engaged, I found a less hazardous division.

      We put some real bad actors away (eeevuul doers for those of you who are slashbots). They did real BAD things to competitors' families. Thanks to you who let rapists and murders continue sharing oxygen with the rest of us, they have already begun getting out of prison. I'm sure that some of them remember me. If they are foolish enough to track me down, I am willing to make sure that it does not happen again.

  51. It Didn't Happen Online by theraccoon · · Score: 1
    I think it's interesting the victim makes a note of buying stuff online as rarely as possible, and the CC fraud occurred via snail mail.

    Why does everyone fear online shopping? A 128 bit encrypted site like Amazon is a hell of a lot safer than the mailbox sitting in my front yard. Am I wrong?

    1. Re:It Didn't Happen Online by feorlen · · Score: 1

      This is why I don't use the mailbox out front except for a very small number of things that I'm forced to by local government agencies.

      I pay $16 a month and have to pick up my mail several blocks away, but it keeps it from being stolen or scatterd all over the street when somebody pulls the mailbox off the wall yet again. I own a rather nice shredder, too. You'll never guess what also happens to the garbage...

    2. re: It Didn't Happen Online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No Walter you're not wrong.
      you're just an ASSHOLE!

    3. Re:It Didn't Happen Online by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      My mail goes right through the letter box in my front door.. problem solved?

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  52. Wow, so many coincidences! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I'm truly amazed at so many coincidences in this story. In fact, some of it is so jaw-dropping coincidental that I have a hard time believing it.

    Booked into a hotel under one name and paying under another? The hotel didn't care? Yet fell over themselves to help the guy?

    Police throwing away evidence?

    Visa et al catching and cutting them off, but the thieves stay put?

    Using the hotel computer?

    1. Re:Wow, so many coincidences! by Junta · · Score: 1

      To the first point, laziness and concern do not preclude each other, and they probably deal frequently with the circumstance, small business employee travel, family member treating another family member, etc...

      The second point, police work isn't all like it is on TV. From their perspective, they witnessed it, probably retained enough for some evidence, and had the rest tossed.

      As to VISA cutting them off, it never says if they had attempted to use it after the card company cut them off. Sure, pending charges might have been rejected, but they would never know that. Besides, what would they do otherwise? They probably assumed they had plenty of time. I had a card stolen once and it turned out just the opposite, the card was cancelled, charges paid by company, and not a damn thing anyone could do to figure out who did it.

      As for using the hotel computer, why not?

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:Wow, so many coincidences! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know Ovid personally -- he's my best friend -- and I have seen some of the evidence. It's real enough. Then again, you have no reason to believe me, either.

  53. Don't Shred: Request the CC company not send them! by thpr · · Score: 4, Informative
    In fact, it bugs me Discover sends me those checks all the time.

    Geez. Call Discover (or almost any other credit card company) and they will never send them again.

  54. I remember this one by hsoft · · Score: 1

    I remember this one. I had a good laugh. The kind of stories that make you feel good (ala Gladiator's "I will have my vengeance, in this life or the next").

    I hadn't read about the DDoS backfire and the fact that Jeff didn't give a sign of life since. Quite disturbing.

    However, I personally don't think this story was true. It's just too cool to be true. Just like this very story.

    --
    perception is reality
  55. Er..... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .... you USians never stop to amaze us.

    In similar situations I just handed over my stuff.

    Nobody was hurt, I was protected (insured) so I did not lose anything. One of the thieves was later caught.

    With all due respect I think you USian guys should consider what firearms are doing to your society.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Er..... by r00t · · Score: 1

      The crowbars would have done a job on him.
      What makes you think not? He's a witness.

    2. Re:Er..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, monsieur can run away --- its at least as safe as a confrontation.

    3. Re:Er..... by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      What a fantastic idea! Perhaps we shouldn't make any effert to deter crime! After all, we are INSURED!! Rob my house? Go right ahead! I have a shiny new homeowner's policy--no sweat! Murder my wife? PLEASE DO! This 500k life insurance policy is just swell.

      Perhaps YOUR country should consider what effect people LIKE YOU have on YOUR society.

    4. Re:Er..... by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      "In similar situations I just handed over my stuff."

      Which works great for assults, as we know.....

      "With all due respect I think you USian guys should consider what firearms are doing to your society."

      Frankly, it's not the guns, it never has been the guns, and it never will be the guns. We have plenty of murders with knives, crowbars, and other common objects.

      Now, if the guns didn't exist, would we have the same number of murders? I don't know, but I can bet that we'd still have *way* more than Europe or Japan.

    5. Re:Er..... by Munra · · Score: 1

      What, lower crime and murder rates?

      Damn you, grand-parent poster!

    6. Re:Er..... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      In similar situations I just handed over my stuff.

      Congratulations on not being killed. I happen to have known a couple people who handed over their posessions to an armed burglar, and were attacked and killed anyway. Insurance didn't help them much.

      If you watch TV in the US, you'll see plenty of security camera footage of roberies, where the victim(s) cooperate fully, and get brutally beaten or killed regardless.

      With all due respect I think you USian guys should consider what firearms are doing to your society.

      Great things, usually...

      Look at a state like Texas, where it was made legal for any legal gun-owner to carry around their loaded firearm in public. Many people like yourself were on their soapboxes yelling that the state was going to turn into The Wild West, and many people would be killed. Instead, the crime rate has dropped significantly, all thanks to guns...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Er..... by rlp · · Score: 1

      .... you USians never stop to amaze us.

      In similar situations I just handed over my stuff.

      Nobody was hurt, I was protected (insured) so I did not lose anything. One of the thieves was later caught.


      In the US where people own guns, most burglaries occur while the homeowner is out. The burglar risks setting off an alarm system, but this is a lesser risk than an armed homeowner.

      In Britain, gun ownership is severely restricted. Robberies while the homeowner is home are rapidly increasing. The criminal then does not have to deal with an alarm system, and knows that the homeowner is not armed. In several recent cases the homeowner was killed or injured by the burglar.

      --
      [Insert pithy quote here]
    8. Re:Er..... by entrigant · · Score: 1

      And in his situations nobody was hurt, he didn't have to go through the hassle of an insurance claim, and he didn't have to catch the thieves after they had his property. Hmm... ya your method definately sounds better now!

  56. saved your life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1st time you saved your car. 2nd time you saved your wallet. You obviously feel great having scared off some petty crims, but I don't believe they were out to murder you.

    Murderers carry guns too.

    1. Re:saved your life? by droopus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1st time you saved your car

      With great respect, I don't agree, I saved my life. One was sitting on my car's bumper. The other then two ran towards at me full speed with full length crowbars. You think a raised 4 foot crowbar in the hands of a running attacker just wants to gently ask for my keys?

      One hit on the head and bye bye droopus. The police caught the same theives days later after they had bludgeoned a woman into a coma, and stole her car.

      Ok here are your choices: feel good about being PC and unarmed, and (God forbid) possibly end up a vegetable in a hospice or on a slab. Or learn to protect yourself, professionally, safely and effectively and live to a ripe old age.

      Which do you want to bet your life on?

      Do what you feel is right for YOU, all I ask is that you extend me the same courtesy. Unless you threaten me or my family with deadly force (and for NO other reason whatsoever) I wouldn't harm a fly. Fair?

      I will admit, training is every bit as important as the decision. I have taken hundreds of hours of training, up to the SWAT level at Blackwater, and am probably better than 90% of AMericans who carry, including cops (many of whom are terrible shots.) Owning and carrying firearms is an awesome responsibility, I do not take it lightly, and unlike the NRA and most gun owners I SUPPORT yearly, tough, proficiency tests, which makes me rather unpopular in the gun world. But that's the way I see it.

      It gets even tougher for criminals in my home where I keep my Winchester 1300 SWAT shotgun with 8 rounds of 00 Buck under the bed.

      My 180 pound bloodhound, Flop, who can smell an unfamiliar person anywhere near my property and is gun trained is added protection.

      NO ONE is going to fuck with my family. And yes, my line of work makes me have reasons to be this secure.

      Murderers carry guns too.

      Damn right they do. So, we should allow them to be the only ones who do?

      If they carry one into my house they get carried out in a body bag, though.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    2. Re:saved your life? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Your either a troll or completely MAD. Plus you'r a dvetising a company that sends private mercenaries to Iraq. But sure its your choice to hide behind the false security of your proffessional pseudo-military training and big gun. I consider myself a reasonable person and agree with the parent poster, if you get mugged just give your stuff and ran away, or if they are threatening throw your wallet or cellphone to the side they will get distracted and run for the items while you are making a getaway. It worked for me several times.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    3. Re:saved your life? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      what if your attacker wants no witnesses? You are gambling with your life that your attacker is a rational person? What do you do when there is more than one attacker, you throw your things to one side, and one of them follows you? How are you going to defend yourself against someone who wants you dead or maimed?

    4. Re:saved your life? by droopus · · Score: 1

      Your sig speaks volumes. You've obviously never been in a situation where your or your family has been faced with imminent death...not a fucking wallet or cellphone. DEATH. I have. What would you do then, hmm? Beg for mercy, as he gassed up his chainsaw?

      I have a daughter whom I love more than life itself. What would you do if you did as well, and someone had a knife to her throat? Talk geopolitical mumbo-jumbo as he cut her carotid? I would drop him in under a second and save what I consider MOST PRECIOUS in my world. You would be placing flowers on her coffin, blaming that asshole in the White House that I like no more than you do. The only difference would be my daughter would be ALIVE. Yours would be dead. But then, of course, you could rationalize it by saying "yes, but I was PC."

      I don't know you, and I truly hope you never do face such a situation, but there are a lot of very sick people around who kill cause they think it's "fun." That will never happen to me. It MAY happen to you.

      Wanna bet your life on it?

      BTW, Blackwater does not provide "mercenaries," they only provide protection services for VIPs in Iraq. Those men hung and burned under the bridge at Fallujah? Blackwater consultants. They gave their lives to protect Paul Bremer. I am enraged we are in Iraq (I HATE Bush) in the first place, but Blackwater is a training school, first and foremost, with worldwide law enforcement their primary clients.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    5. Re:saved your life? by jeti · · Score: 1

      You have a young daughter and you keep a firearm under your pillow?
      I think this practice endangers your daughter more than any thief. Please store your firearms in a safe.

    6. Re:saved your life? by droopus · · Score: 1

      You have a young daughter and you keep a firearm under your pillow?
      I think this practice endangers your daughter more than any thief. Please store your firearms in a safe.


      Good advice, of course. I think you misread...after the kids (my daughter is a young teenager) are asleep, I remove my shotgun from my gun "vault" a steel-doored, locked, toolroom type room where all firearms are kept in a safe, all ammo in another and all magazines in a third. (All the safes are digital, no keys), and only then place it under my bed for the night. It's an 8 shot Winchester 1300, but I do NOT leave one in the chamber. I also have another fingerprint safe hidden in the bedroom closet (digital as well) with a Glock 19, equipped with an M-6 light laser and 2 high cap mags of +P Hydra-Shoks. There is also a loaded Air Taser, with a spare cartridge in the safe, both for my wife to protect the second floor if I go downstairs. My wife gets up in the morning and before she wakes the kids, the shotgun is emptied and goes back in the vault.

      And you know what? It don't mean shit. I know I am far more conscious and careful about my firearms than most but the most important thing is to teach my kids proper safety rules. My 4 year old is adamant (and has been taught) that if he is at a friend's house and a gun comes out he is to stop, tell the child to put it away and immediately leave, though not run (that's the most common way kids get shot...running away. If the kid insists on playing with it, he knows to say "hay. lets point it at the ground and see if its loaded"...and he can unload anything (I taught him)... even the largest 1911's.

      My daughter has been doing the same for 8 years now. She even comes to the range once in a while but isn't into shooting much.

      Safes, of course. Education is the most important though, imo.

      Oh, BTW...my pillow? Thats a terrible place for a gun...it's movie shit. I don't think sleeping on a shotgun would be very comfortable, do you. ; ) Under the bed on a wooden sheet covered in felt. hehe

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    7. Re:saved your life? by Ours · · Score: 2, Funny

      My 180 pound bloodhound, Flop, who can smell an unfamiliar person anywhere near my property and is gun trained is added protection. Wow, you Americans even train your dogs to use guns. ;-)

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    8. Re:saved your life? by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

      If everyone did as you suggest, you would be living in an environment where criminals rule. They would KNOW, not just hope, KNOW that no law-abiding citizen would be dangerous to them. All they have to do is pull out their guns and they get money. If everyone throws them money when they show a gun, that would be incentive to keep on doing it. Yes, it's a cliche, but it's the truth: When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns. I don't own a gun, but I'm glad many of my friends do.

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    9. Re:saved your life? by justins · · Score: 1
      You think a raised 4 foot crowbar in the hands of a running attacker just wants to gently ask for my keys?

      With all due respect for the Europe that I love, I think you've identified the naivete that is responsible for a lot of European pacifism.

      The police caught the same theives days later after they had bludgeoned a woman into a coma, and stole her car.

      Clearly, she should have stayed at home, or hid behind her Maginot Line, or something.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    10. Re:saved your life? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      The proposition that muggers eliminate witnesses is simply NOT TRUE. The statistics clearly show that resisting makes your many times more likely to get hurt. I mean really all tehy want is your petty posssions. If they get caught, they are likely to get away with probation or light sentencing, if they get caught with not-so carefully planned murder they are scrwed and they know it. Heck, any Aikido expert will tell you that running away is the best option and resisting should be reserved for that 0.00001% when you are backed against the corner by several attackers. I read this guys blog, he is a mad gun nut who is arming himslef to the teeth. Hr claims that its neccessary because of his proffession, dunno maybe he delivers pizza in Harlem or something.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    11. Re:saved your life? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      The world is not overrun by criminals and its not because of armed-to-the teath vigilantee citizens. Can we agree to that? We pay taxes to have proffesiinal police to protect us so we can concentrate on what we do best instead of spending countless hours getting proffessional level SWAT training at Blackwater. That plus avoiding dangerous places is more important that any false sense of secuity that carrying a firearm gives you.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    12. Re:saved your life? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Sorry but I have better things to do than fantasize about heroically defending my family against a gang of crazed chainsaw wielding drug junkies. Really I dont live in America, maybe this kind of shit does really happen all the time there. Yet statistically your much more likely to get injured in an auto-accident than than brutally dismembered by psychos. Do you put as much and MORE attention to car and driving safety? Do you have really high blood pressure from being scared and worrying all the time? If you are for real and are this way because of having been traumatizede as a crime victim then please accept my apologies. But I still think that the hours and $$ you put towards your Blackwater training would have been better put into sessions with a good Psychologist. Your are choosing the wrong way to deal with post-traumatic shock.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    13. Re:saved your life? by droopus · · Score: 1

      Nah, just means he wont run away in terror at the sound of a firearm.

      I do hate languages. B)

      BTW, the best shotguns in the world are English and Italian.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    14. Re:saved your life? by droopus · · Score: 1

      Sadly, home invasion in the US is on a steep rise. I truly wish it wasn't, but it happens in every state, every day. While I have reasons to be secure because of my work, you are absolutely right about the car danger as well, which is why I also trained with Skip Barber in defensive driving, racing, and evasive driving. Probably three quarters of the time I trained for firearms, but imvho, defensive driving is a lot easier and carries less personal responsibility than carrying firearms.

      And yes I have spent plenty of time on the couch, your advice is quite sound. But if three guys crash through my windows, I'll be holding a shotgun, not my shrink's card.

      And as I've said all through this thread, I hope I NEVER have to use any of this training. I just am a strong proponent of preparation.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    15. Re:saved your life? by droopus · · Score: 1

      I read this guys blog, he is a mad gun nut who is arming himslef to the teeth. Hr claims that its neccessary because of his proffession, dunno maybe he delivers pizza in Harlem or something.

      Are you referring to me? If not, my apologies. If so, a few problems there.

      a) I do very much like, but do not deliver pizza. NY pizza rocks.

      b) While my company is in NYC, I live in another state and either telecommute or take the train a few days a week if I must. Of course, I can't carry if I go to NYC.

      C) NYC is probably THE most difficult place to even possess a gun. More importantly, almost NO ONE in NYC can get a carry permit, other than diamond dealers. (All those Hasidic guys around 47th street? They are all armed.) Armored car dealers or anyone who handles large sums of money, too, but even then, the restrictions are loony. I always wondered...when they made the NYC gun laws... why are diamonds worth more than human lives?

      d) I admit, that when I have had to go to particularly bad areas of the city, I have a few times "mistakenly" dropped a Seecamp .32 in my laptop bag. (they are smaller than a deck of cards, and hold 6 .32 hollowpoints.) It bothers me to skirt the law that way, but at least I'll see my kids that night.

      e) I don't have a blog.

      f) NYC pizza rocks.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    16. Re:saved your life? by droopus · · Score: 1

      I am in not in any way a vigilante. I don't walk the streets looking for crime so I can shoot someone, acting as my own police force. (Perhaps it's a language thing, that's what vigilantism is.)

      Let me ask you a question, my friend. Do you have locks? Of course you do. Why? Because statisticially, unless you are lucky enough to live on an island alone, you want to control who comes in your home, correct? Good.

      If suddenly, near you, you started to see more and more breakins during the night, would you not strengthen your locks, perhaps put in some lighting? Sure.

      I live in the highest per capita income county in the USA. Home invasions and mass family assault have TRIPLED in the last year. Less than a year ago, a house less than a quarter mile away had four men break down the front door with a pickup truck, jumped out, all armed, and killed everyone in the house. They gang raped the wife to death, and then just plain old gang raped the 12 year old girl twins. Then they gutted them like pigs. They loaded anything of value in the truck and drove away. It took eleven minutes.

      This horrible case is not the only thing like this to happen in this county. Criminals know there is money and will do stuff like the above without hesitation. I didn't make it that way. Fix it, and I'd gladly find carrying unecessary.

      What would I have done? The instant I hear a noise like a car going through a wall, my wife and kids would lock themselves in our bedroom, where my wife would be armed with a Glock 19 out of the safe in the closet. She would hit 911 on the way to the safe. I would get my shotgun, kill all upstairs lighting, and as each guy came to the stairwell, I would ascertain he was armed and he would get two loads of 00 Buckshot from 15 feet. Hamburger. The other three now have a choice: get the hell away, since they will already hear the sirens, or storm the stairs, which again, six shots of 00 Buck would easily handle. If for some horrible reason I went down, or had a malfunction, they would kick in my bedroom door and meet one very pissed off woman with a Glock, a laser sight and 30 Black Talons.

      I've just put on really strong locks. As I've been saying...NO ONE fucks with my family.

      BTW, the training at Blackwater was fun, intruiging, challenging and I gained a few friends. What's wrong with that?

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    17. Re:saved your life? by MoralHazard · · Score: 1

      One NYC resident to another...

      "C) NYC is probably THE most difficult place to even possess a gun. More importantly, almost NO ONE in NYC can get a carry permit, other than diamond dealers. (All those Hasidic guys around 47th street? They are all armed.) Armored car dealers or anyone who handles large sums of money, too, but even then, the restrictions are loony. I always wondered...when they made the NYC gun laws... why are diamonds worth more than human lives?"

      It's a good observation. Me, I'd love to get a gun for sport shooting. Maybe a shotgun for trap, or a .22 to plink with. It's possible to own a gun (unloaded, secured carry to/from the range only) if you're willing to deal with 3-4 months of waiting and a couple hundred dollars in permit fees. That just isn't worth it to me, for a hobby.

      "d) I admit, that when I have had to go to particularly bad areas of the city, I have a few times "mistakenly" dropped a Seecamp .32 in my laptop bag. (they are smaller than a deck of cards, and hold 6 .32 hollowpoints.) It bothers me to skirt the law that way, but at least I'll see my kids that night."

      THIS is the part that I have a problem with: NYC is not particularly dangerous, and it hasn't been for a LONG time. I consider this to be a pretty nasty stereotype that's outlived the truth that created it.

      I live in Brooklyn, and hang out everywhere--Midtown, SoHo, Lower Manhattan, Hell's Kitchen, the Village, the LES, the UES, the triple-US, Harlem, the Bronx, Sunnyside, Forest Hills, Park Slope, Ft. Greene, Brownsville, East NY, Willamsburg, Bed-Stuy, Red Hook, Bensonhurst... You get the point. I used the stick to the Village and downtown, but my friends have scattered everywhere in the last couple of years. I think I have a better-than-average taste for what city is like, day and night.

      I'm a white boy, not particularly big, with no martial arts training or weightlifting habits. I dress middle-class casual or suit-and-tie, pretty normal for the city. In all the years I've been here, and on all the streets I've prowled, I've never once felt threatened or in real danger of street crime. I know people who have been mugged (mostly years back, but some recently) or assaulted on the street, but only a tiny number of them were injured or seriously threatened (e.g., a gun in the face).

      Street crime in NYC is at a low not seen since the 60s. For all the major violent crime categories except sexual assult, it's the safest city in America with more than 1 million people. The whole goddamned town in on a massive gentrification kick, so even the places that were spooky 5 years ago are full of married homos and college kids, now.

      I can think of maybe 3 neighborhoods in all of the five boroughs where I would worry about an adult male traveling alone: the Marcy Projects, Brighton Beach, and... well, I was gonna say the South Bronx, but since all those art galleries moved in, it hasn't been the same. Outside of those two spots, you have little to fear if you don't start trouble for yourself. If you're a girl, you have to be more careful, but that's true anywhere to about the same degree. Same for kids and the elderly.

      Anyway, all I'm saying is that NYC is generally safe enough these days that it won't be worth getting caught with an unlicensed concealed weapon. 10 or 15 years ago, I could see you weighing the risks and reasonably deciding to carry, permit or no. But not today--that's some serious time for too little additional protection, even if you're otherwise within the law and don't have a record--and Albany's talking about raising the minimum penalties, too.

      Why not try carrying a boxcutter or something like that, instead? It was always an effective deterrent when I was a kid in LA (now THAT'S a place I'd carry a gun!), and you won't go to jail for carrying one. Technically, I guess it's a concealed weapon, but it's not a firearm and you can plausibly tell the officer/judge that you just forgot that you had it when you left the house. Or, if you're into that shit, some Mace could help.

      "f) NYC pizza rocks."

      Of course it does.

  57. Nonsense. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Banks do not send CC information over the Internet.

    ATMs normally are on Intranets or private nets not connected to the net.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  58. You're missing the obvious by savage1r · · Score: 0

    But if you use your credit card the invisible lizard people who secretly control our government can track you! Never use anything but dollar coins because they can use that magneto-whatsis strip in the 5's, 10's and 20's too! Gaaaah, men in black suits are knocking on my as;lrne

  59. Identity Theft by Treacle+Treatment · · Score: 1

    I don't have an identity you insensitive clod!

    --
    TT
    1. Re:Identity Theft by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Should have posted that AC...

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  60. credit card security my **s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cash can be stolen and used easily. Cards can be stolen and used, but you can get the money back. Big difference.

    ----
    how wrong, my dad is a hispanic male, command of english is very limited. Anyways, someone had gotten a credit card under his name. They charged 4,000 dollars of crap to it. Several months later they must have stopped making payments or somethign and disappeared from radar. Because next thing my dad gets a letter from a collection agency after having tracked him "down" (like he was ever hiding!). Anyways, we go through all the hassel of contacting wellsfargo, all the credit reporting agency/unions, the avondale, az, police department, etc.

    Final result, my dad's credit is screwed. Wells fargo expects my dad to pay something like 400 dollars or so. My dad asked (my mom had been talking to the english speaking rep) to speak to someone who spoke spanish and he proceeded to tell them that he didn't get the card, he didn't charge it so he wasn't paying and hung up.

    Yeah, not the best method of handling stuff. But credit cards are not that safe.

    On the other hand, I still use wellsfargo; while at my university I believe it was my singaporese roommate who tried to fly to nyork, or was it to california? Anyways, wellsfargo covered me there. Dumb**s thought I had a bigger credit limit than 800 dollars! The fraud unit for the online flight booking place called me to confirm if I had ordered tickets, which is how I learned about this. Never saw the guy again or heard what happened. Filed some forms confirming I got ripped and Got a new card/number.

    Oh, my dad now uses my mom as his form of getting credit.

  61. This story is very likely made up.. by EmagGeek · · Score: 0, Troll

    First of all, anti-terrorism legislation requires hotels retain a photocopy of your driver's license. I find it highly unlikely that the hotel will accept a license in one name and payment via another name with only a credit card number. Second, credit card companies don't get details about a charge for 2-3 days after the charge is made, so there's no way that the CC company could have known that the charge was made at Denny's or what zip code that Denny's was in. The credit card processors always take 2-3 days to post the charge to the issuing bank, and it is then and only then that the issuing bank knows what store the charge was made at. The only piece of information the issuing bank receives is the TYPE of establishment the charge is made at. In this case, the only think his credit card issuer would have been able to tell him was that the charge was made at a restaurant. That's it.

    I went through similar credit card theft 2 years ago, so I have firsthand knowledge of how these processes work. I check my online accounts every day, so one day when I saw that my available balance had been cut in half, I called to see what the authorization was for. My CC company told me that all they knew was that it was an Office Supply retail store in British Columbia. They were very helpful in explaining how Visa and Mastercard work - that the merchant processor submits an authorization, which tells the issuing bank the type of store and amount, and then posts the actual transaction in a batch process every 48-72 hours. It is only when the transaction is posted that the issuer knows any details about the place where the card was used.

    This guy certainly has his talent for fiction, but that is all this story is.

    1. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by publius_ovidius · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wrong answer. Thank you for playing. We have wonderful consolation prizes for you (or not.)

      For what it's worth, and as I noted earlier in this thread, I'm actually fairly well-known in the Perl community. I'm a grant manager for the Perl Foundation, a scheduled speaker at the next OSCON, and an occasional technical book reviewer for O'Reilly. If I dared to create a lie this huge, my reputation would be ruined. I generally get job offers because of who I am. That would go away. Regardless of what you may think of my story, I'm not so stupid as to make this up.

      They did have a photocopy of ID of one of the thieves. However, the registration (made through hotels.com) was still billed to me. And as for your info about the credit card companies, I know nothing about your experience, but it is vastly different from mine. If you have any credit cards, call and ask to speak to their fraud department (or, more likely, navigate through all of the damned menus they have.) I'm sure they'll be happy to set you straight.

    2. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by I+kan+Spl · · Score: 1

      At the expense of my Mod points, I must point out, sir, that you are wrong.

      anti-terrorism legislation requires hotels retain a photocopy of your driver's license. I find it highly unlikely that the hotel will accept a license in one name and payment via another name with only a credit card number.

      This is how businesses normally pay for rooms when employees go on trips. Most companies do not give a card with each employees name on it, unless they are of the "enterprise" level.

      Second, credit card companies don't get details about a charge for 2-3 days after the charge is made, so there's no way that the CC company could have known that the charge was made at Denny's or what zip code that Denny's was in.

      Ummmmmm. No. Credit card companies know about a charge the instant it is made. Otherwise there would be no way to deny the charge if the card has been canceled or expired. At least my credit card company (Wells Fargo) has all charges show up on the web interface within about three minutes of the charge being processed. Yes, I have timed it.

      Also, batch processing of credit card transactions is not legal in the state of California. It would allow companies to have "mystery money" in their accounting that has been "paid" to them, but they have not yet retrieved from your account. I'm not sure if this is from California, but I'm sure there is very similar laws in the rest of the US. Also, these laws were not around two years ago.

      --
      My UID is prime and so is this number: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0.
    3. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by Jetson · · Score: 1

      1: In some cases, the bank *is* the card issuer.
      2: Different merchants have different reporting methods/rules. Very few are doing end-of-day batching now -- it's easier to get the confirmation electronically on-the-spot, in which case the details of the charge are immediately sent.
      For these two reasons, I routinely see my credit card charges on my bank's on-line banking site (complete with merchant ID or address) within 24 hours.
      I have made quite a few on-line purchases. The only time I ever had a problem it was because someone at a gas station double-swiped my card. The bank called me about 30 minutes after the card was used in Hong Kong.

    4. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What BS.

      My job involves travel.. lots of travel. Hotels never make a copy of my drivers license. *Never*. They don't even ask to do so.

      I don't know what kinda crack houses you've been staying in, but it's not something that happens in real hotels.

    5. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by (startx) · · Score: 1

      Where to begin.....

      First of all, anti-terrorism legislation requires hotels retain a photocopy of your driver's license.

      Nope, I just stayed at a Holiday Inn in AL, and a Days Inn in CO, both within the last month. Neither asked for a driver's license.

      Second, credit card companies don't get details about a charge for 2-3 days after the charge is made,

      BS here too. I can make a purchase anywhere in town, and by the time I get back to my computer, the Name of the store, location, and amount charged are already in my online visa statement through BoA.

      I went through similar credit card theft 2 years ago

      A lot can change in two years.

    6. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Uhhhhh wow. You are certainly sure of yourself. You are WRONG of course, but at least you have conviction.

      I have personally witnessed, in the last three months, a reputable brand name large chain hotel take a CC# OVER THE PHONE for a party who was checking in. The name on the card given and the name of the party checking in did not match.

      Strike one for your "fiction" theory.

      I don't know what kind of hokey CC company you have but my CC companies (Discover, Bank One, local issue Debit Card) will show purchases within 60 MINUTES...complete with details. How much, what store and in some cases what items. My wife does it to me allllll the time. :-) Whoever you talked to at your CC company doesn't know how it works.

      Strike two for your "fiction" theory.

      The final nail for your coffin is that this guy is a known person in PERL circles. He isn't some nameless, faceless teen-something trying to feel important.

      Strike three, 'yer out.

    7. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by slashrogue · · Score: 1

      Maybe you need to have credit cards with companies that are up to snuff these days, the current Visa I use is updated the same day (often under an hour) for purchases made before the close of the business day, and whatever else immediately shows up the next day. And I don't mean just a dollar amount, it has the name of the business etc.

    8. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by publius_ovidius · · Score: 2, Funny
      The final nail for your coffin is that this guy is a known person in PERL circles. He isn't some nameless, faceless teen-something trying to feel important.

      You're absolutely correct. I'm a named, faced, mid-thirties guy trying to feel important :)

    9. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      I stay in hotels 2-3 nights, per week. I'd say about 60% of the time they photocopy my ID. I usually call ahead, book on the phone with credit card (I call, rather than book online, I find I get better deals this way), and then when I show up in person I give them my name and they give me a key. Sometimes they ask for the credit card I used to book, *OR* the method I wish to pay by. So at this point I could give them a *different* credit card, or cash. No ID.

    10. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As others have pointed out the parent is a troll, but I just wanted to say that hotels definately will accept payment for a room with an unrelated credit card because it happens legitamitely ALL the time. Just as an example I used to be involved with booking touring musicians from time to time. As part of their rider we, of course, needed to get hotel rooms for them. That's just one example.

      I also doubt that hotels are a particularly large victim of CC fraud simply because of problems like these crooks had. They obviously were extremely incompetant since they used the stolen CC# to buy things that allowed them to be easily tracked down to a particular location.

    11. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by lemming552 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, right. I bet it will be difficult to find anyone on this thread that knows you personally to back you up on this. what? Next thing you'll tell me I'm supposed to see Ovid on Sunday...

    12. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a /. account and, while I have it RSSed to my journal, this is my first post... But yeah, I've known Curtis / Ovid for a while now and know him to be a man of his word.

      (Really, is it so hard to believe that someone with the technical skill and experience to do it helped to collar two people working within his area of expertise?)

      [lj user=l00p]

    13. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Troll
      I think Dan Rather is a *bit* more famous than you, and yet he perpetrated a much larger lie. Well-respected community leaders have lied about much smaller things. Some people have a need to be percieved as war heroes, and lie about their military service. All these people are much larger than some programmer in a small community that really doesn't meet that often anyway.

      I hope that now you realize just how silly your "I stand by my story" defense sounds.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    14. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by publius_ovidius · · Score: 1

      Heh. See you Sunday, Mark :)

    15. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by publius_ovidius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thanks Matt. Really, though, many in the /. crowd just want a chance to take someone down a peg. And while my story's true, you have to admit, it's pretty weird. I can understand a few people doubting me.

    16. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The final nail for your coffin is that this guy is a known person in PERL circles

      Well then! You've told him! If he's known in PERL circles then there's NO WAY he would lie!

    17. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      What you don't take into account, though, is that (most) people don't tell lies for the sake of telling lies: they tell lies in order to reach certain goals.

      What would Ovid gain by lying about this? Nothing I can think of. Specifically, he certainly doesn't gain any further reputation out of this. On the other hand, what could he possibly lose if the story was not true and he was found out to have been lying? A lot - namely, said reputation.

      Of course, that (losing one's reputation) is a risk people are often (?) willing to take, but only when they actually hope to gain something. If you want to look like a war hero instead of like someone who went AWOL for several months after daddy bought them a nice and relaxed job in the Texas national guard, then you at least have a *reason* to lie. :)

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    18. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by pz · · Score: 1

      anti-terrorism legislation requires hotels retain a photocopy of your driver's license

      Can you cite this legislation?

      My experience staying in hotels in the US 2-3 times per year post September 11 is that not one has asked to see my identification. Granted, I tend to stay in a more expensive class of hotels than Red Lion, but beyond a valid credit card, they do not verify identity.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    19. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by bani · · Score: 1

      i can make a cc purchase across town, go home and pull up my online statement and see the authorization "pending" just a few minutes later. with the name of the business, amount, and the zipcode.

      sorry if your cc company sucks, doesnt mean that everyone else's does.

    20. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 1
      First, I'm fairly sure Dan Rather didn't lie. He was absolutely wrong, but that's different then willfully telling something you know to be false. Dan Rather believed the story he'd been given, and errantly trusted the people who "verified" and "autheniticated" the documents. Dan Rather I'm fairly sure doesn't have the expertise or skills necessary to have realized the lie that happened. Dan might have been duped because he wanted to believe (for which you can fault him to no end, and I'll not argue). However, I have absolutely no doubt that Dan Rather at no point, knew it wasn't true and continued to report upon it. He stubbornly held on, because he trusted people he shouldn't have. You can even accuse him refusing to accept reality when it was put in front of him. However, that's still semantically a different deal then flat out lying. For all the bad things I've thought about Dan Rather at various points, calling him a liar never was one of them. (Biased, stupid, bumpkin being among the pot shots I'd take at him).

      Second, you're looking at the situation all wrong. I've been on the wrong end of a collection agency's phone calls, just becuase I got some deadbeats old phone number. I gave them the same advice:

      Just because you deal with liars all day, doesn't mean that I'm not telling you the truth. You are making harassing phone calls to a completely innocent person. You're harrasing me, and that's against Federal Law. Let's turn this around, I'm calling you to speak with John Doe, he owes me money. "But I'm not John Doe, John Doe doesn't live here you have the wrong number". Well that's what anyone who is getting collected from will say. So I got harrassing phone calls all the time (at times that were when I was sleeping because I live a non-standard schedule, despite Federal Laws that should have protected me from that). In the end, it's what finally got me to just give up my land line. I had no use for it, and having collection agencys calling me wans't working out. The best part, is that collection agencys can't call cell phones. They can't do anything that could cost you more money. So no collect calls, and no cell phones.

      Stop and think about the completely honest person completely telling you the truth. They'd give you the indiginate response of: "That person doesn't live here, stop calling me". Just like someone who tells a wild tale about catching an identity thief says: "You can believe me or not, but it still happened". Short of him getting a notarized copy of a police report (all of which would be trivial to fake, how precisely would he prove it to you?).

      I still remember you as the irritating fellow who accused me of being an Microsoft Shill (your nickname is memorable, if only because I have 3 of the 4 editions of that book), because I pointed out that a couple of books by "Microsoft Press" had some really good advice. "Code Complete", and "Writing Solid Code" are still pretty damn good books even after all this time (Haven't read the second edition of "Code Complete"). Despite the fact that I gave up using Microsoft products 7-8 years ago, you were quite insistant that I had to be a Microsoft Astroturf'er, and Shill. Even when my posting history is fairly clear I'm not. So go ahead, be a Doubting Thomas, however, I know for an absolute fact, you've jumped to wrong conclusions, and then stuck to them long after it was obvious to anyone aware of the details you were completely wrong. How very Dan Rather like of you...

      Kirby

    21. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Seeing as I've worked almost exclusively with card processing for the last couple of years I think I know that process a bit better than you, and I can guarantee that what you're describing is generally wrong. SOME merchants may only submit RECEIPTS in batches, but any merchant that does online processing of payments - which is most these days (how often do you see them pulling out the old style card rollers?) - will immediately submit the full details to their payment service processor. Now, some PSP's MAY submit only limited information in realtime to the aquirers, and some aquirers may pass on only limited information in realtime to the issuers, but in practice most submit full details these days. I've personally had my bank call me within 5-10 minutes of a transaction for a fraud check (if I've made large purchases that doesn't fit my normal purchase patterns for instance) and had them rattle of the full days worth of charges with exact detail to me for me to verify. What you describe may still hold some places with banks that still haven't upgraded their systems, but it's very much a thing of the past for most credit card users. What I find shocking though, is how often I get calls f from my bank or card companies (from numbers I don't know) and they expect ME to authenticate to THEM by giving out personal details. I find it amazing that they actually want to train their customers to consider such calls "normal". I'm always very skeptical about them, and tend to prefer calling back on a number known to me, but I bet lots of customers aren't.

    22. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by warpath · · Score: 1
      I think Dan Rather is a *bit* more famous than you, and yet he perpetrated a much larger lie.
      Yes*, and Dan Rather remains a respected newsman and anchor at CBS News... oh wait.

      *=I dunno if Rather lied but he was wrong either way and has certainly paid for it.
    23. Re:This story is very likely made up.. by nametaken · · Score: 1


      Sir, that kid is talking out his ass and we know it.

      That kid doesn't speak for us, and we congratulate you on your outstanding victory. :)

      I don't think he even read your writeup, or he would have KNOWN that you booked through hotels.com.

  62. Really? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    never use a card when cash will get the job done. It might sound "cute", but it's the best way to protect your privacy - not to mention your bank account.

    Really? That's true about privacy, and when I get around to laundering this pile of dirty money, that'll be great. But I think you're crazy regarding protecting your bank account (unless you mean from yourself, at which point some self-discipline would help).

    You can't contest a purchase with cash. You don't get free product insurance with cash. You don't get a nice charge summary with cash. You don't have to go to an ATM or a bank to get your card, as you do with cash. Using cash doesn't help your credit rating, and should you ever want a better car or develop the desire to move out on your own, cash doesn't help develop a good credit rating.

    I understand the card companies get a lot in profit from people, on average, for those services. But I don't pay them a thing, because I pay them off every month, on time. And since the credit card companies make it against the rules to pass on merchant fees (ie, no discount for paying cash), I figure why not take advantage of the situation?

    1. Re:Really? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      You make some intersting points. Except I find one humoursly circular and self feeding.
      Use credit so you have a better credit rating so you can use more credit. I find it amazing that 'credit' ratings have become so all important, even if you don't live a lifestyle that needs significant credit, esp in relation to your ongoing expenses.
      A trivial loan to someone without any established credit, but a good paying job and no debts, is gonna be very difficult and have a hugamoungus intrest. Why are people penalized in this society for NOT tending to live in debt? I don't get it (actually I do, it's more profitable, what I don't get is why people buy into this myth).
      IOW: f*ck keeping up with the jones, when thier 75 and in a nursing home tied to bed because they owed 10years salary to 'the man' and got sick I'll still be getting by on what actually is good enough in most areas and few nice things where it's important to me.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    2. Re:Really? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      You make some intersting points. Except I find one humoursly circular and self feeding. Use credit so you have a better credit rating so you can use more credit. I find it amazing that 'credit' ratings have become so all important, even if you don't live a lifestyle that needs significant credit, esp in relation to your ongoing expenses.

      It is self feeding. I hate that it's so, but realistically, it's necessary. When you go to ever purchase a home or other high ticket item, the difference can save you somewhere between hundreds-tens of thousnads of dollars. If you don't have a lifestyle that needs credit - and you NEVER will - then don't worry. But that describes very few people anymore.

      Why are people penalized in this society for NOT tending to live in debt? I don't get it (actually I do, it's more profitable, what I don't get is why people buy into this myth).

      There's good debt and bad debt, but in general I agree 100% with the sentiment. I have no bad debt. I pay off my cards every month, and haven't paid interest ever. I just bought a car today with cash. The dealership tried to get me to finance saying I had the best credit he'd ever seen, but I paid cash anyway.

      But someday, I'd like to own a home at a very low rate, and that requires a solid credit history. And really, you can build credit by using credit cards responsibly every month. You're never in debt and you get valuable services and convenience for free. How is that not a good deal?

      IOW: f*ck keeping up with the jones, when thier 75 and in a nursing home tied to bed because they owed 10years salary to 'the man' and got sick I'll still be getting by on what actually is good enough in most areas and few nice things where it's important to me.

      Amen. ;)

    3. Re:Really? by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1
      There's a difference between living in debt and making use of credit.

      Let's say as an example you have a credit card with a $400 limit, and every month you make between $200-$300 worth of purchases using your credit card and pay it back immediately when your statement comes in. Contrast that with someone who has never used credit in their life and merely uses cash.

      Who would you say has a more verifiable credit history and has shown they are able to pay back credit (at least to some degree) ?

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    4. Re:Really? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Ahh replace credit with use crack cocain.
      makes an interesting read.
      But seriously, the ability to pay back credit is amatter of income-outgo. If you make more than you spend, the remainder represents your maximum ability to pay back credit.
      What a history of doing so shows is willingnes to pay back credit, and the planning necessary not to exceded one's ability to do so.
      The problem is most credit card companies figure your ability as the sum of ability and willingness, and issue credit based on paying the MINIMUM payment, which is amount that leaves you paying huge interest rates for years.
      And they do this based on data that in 1/4 to 1/3 of all cases has significant errors.
      Is it any wonder we have a situation where most people are in debt rather than saving money. Not that the creditors are alone in blame here, the "OH SHINY I WANT" factor aplies rather heavily.
      How often one has used credit is only one part of thier picture. A person with a decent job,car,etc. who's never used credit has shown better fiscal discipline than most is more like to be able to pay credit that doesn't cause him to encroach on the limit of his means. Though a creditor should be aware of the change in circumstances to cause such an individual to seek credit.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  63. The scary thing is... by StimpyPimp · · Score: 1

    That scam actually works.

    --
    This signature is part of a balanced post.
  64. Lucky by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised at just how perfectly this all worked out.

    They happened to remember who picked up the order, based on the number? Perhaps the time (6AM), or what they ordered, was somewhat distinct, so I can see it. This is incredibly lucky.

    The people at the hotel seemed abnormally helpful as well; I really wouldn't have been that surprised if they said, "Nope, don't know," and went about their business. Instead, they called employees at home. He just happened to get someone who knew exactly who they were, and their room number. They just happened to have used something with a traceable billing address.

    Just as they were identified, they happened to come down.

    Having your credit card stolen is unlucky, but if it ever happens to me, I hope I'm as lucky as this guy!

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    1. Re:Lucky by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that if you charge back charges on your credit card it's ultimately the merchant that has to pay, not the card company. So if these guys where paying by card it's in the hotels interest as well to get it sorted out before they run up significant charges.

  65. You are kidding right? by juuri · · Score: 1

    First of all, anti-terrorism legislation requires hotels retain a photocopy of your driver's license. I find it highly unlikely that the hotel will accept a license in one name and payment via another name with only a credit card number.

    Now maybe when you stay at The Hampton's Inn, or some other major chain they will always follow through on complying with regulations. But if you honestly believe low end, transient home hotels ask for ID you have obviously never been to one. Hell a lot of those places take cash, no questions asked.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
    1. Re:You are kidding right? by damsa · · Score: 1

      Red Lion is pretty large hotel chain in the west coast. That being said I don't it would be an uncommon practice for people staying in the hotel to be different from the ones paying.

  66. Source of Info by suwain_2 · · Score: 1

    Out of curiousity, do you have any idea how they got your information? If they stole one of your cards, it could have been anywhere you used it. But they had two of your cards.

    (This is discussed a bit on his first post about it, but my question isn't answered.)

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    1. Re:Source of Info by publius_ovidius · · Score: 3, Informative

      I really have no idea. The fact that one of them had a credit card check in his pocket suggests they went through my recycling and found something I forgot to tear up. However, maybe they found something some other way? I just don't know.

      I'm looking forward to the police report. One of them (the guy who first walked into the lobby, not the blond kid) swore that he didn't do anything. The blond one seemed rather calm. The police separated them into different cruisers, perhaps so they couldn't get their stories straight. If one of them confesses, I'm sure that will be in the report and then I'll know. Of course, everyone will know, too, as I intend to post the reports as soon as I can.

  67. Your a Sick Puppy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like that in a dead animal.

  68. Red Lion = Red Devil by Baby+Duck · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1) I have stayed at that Red Lion in Portland.
    2) I have eaten at that Denny's as well.
    3) I have checked my email on the computer in the lobby.
    4) A PuTTY icon on the desktop should have clued me in that I should not have checked my email there.
    5) Over the next 3 days, my ISP account was used to spam strangers like crazy, before I finally changed my password.
    6) This was almost 2 years ago.

    Nice to see the Red Lion is still such a hotbed of criminal activity ;-)

    --

    "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

    1. Re:Red Lion = Red Devil by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      If you must check your e-mail on a public computer, at least use SSL. Any large webmail provider supports it, and if its your own box, you can setup SSL for free with a self-signed certificate.

    2. Re:Red Lion = Red Devil by SerialEx13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if the transmission is encrypted, it won't do much good if there's a keylogger on the system.

    3. Re:Red Lion = Red Devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why, when I was on an international trip a couple of years ago (from Australia to the US/Canada), I deliberately set up my work box to accept logins using OPIE. I had my Palm Pilot with me to calculate the appropriate details. Worked like a charm.

  69. Re:Cash cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    >I've lost $0 in credit card theft, but dealing with the attempts has cost me quite a bit more in time: more than 100 times as much

    So, you've lost $0 then?

  70. Why isn't the credit issuer held libel? by PanHEad2003 · · Score: 1

    Since the company that issued credit to someone using fraudulent identification, why are they not held libel due to their negligence? Why is the person who has had their identity stolen responsible for cleaning it up, when the credit issuers are the ones that have ruined it by giving credit to someone using a false ID. Credit issuers are not making enough identity verification if identity theft is occurring.

    1. Re:Why isn't the credit issuer held libel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Becuase libel and fraud are totally different things?

    2. Re:Why isn't the credit issuer held libel? by vidarh · · Score: 1

      Where did you get the impression that the card companies didn't take responsibility? (btw. it's "liable" not "libel"). This guy specifically pointed out that both Discover and Visa called him to check the transactions, and unless he was clearly at fault (doesn't sound like it) the card companies generally do take responsibility (or rather they pass it on to the merchant).

  71. Chuck Noris, eat your heart out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dirty Harry reads slashdot!

    1. Re:Chuck Noris, eat your heart out! by droopus · · Score: 1

      ROTFLMAO....that's great.

      I do have a 44 Magnum in my collection though. But a real one (S&W 629 Stainless) not that thing in the movie. They are NASTY weapons, but no cop would carry one.

      I also have a 22 with a silencer to practice in the woods out back. (It's legal.) That's a really fun piece.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    2. Re:Chuck Noris, eat your heart out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel really sorry for him. What a waste of time.

    3. Re:Chuck Noris, eat your heart out! by droopus · · Score: 3, Funny

      I feel really sorry for him. What a waste of time.

      You're on /. at 1 AM and you say I waste time?

      Tee hee.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    4. Re:Chuck Noris, eat your heart out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on where he is. 1 AM in New York City, for example, is 4PM in Melbourne, Australia.

  72. Stolen Identity by Cliff.Braun · · Score: 1

    What I want to see happen is someone to commit a large crime, and have a warrant out for their arrest, and then have their identity stolen. The person who stole the identity now has a warrant out for their arrest, and to avoid it they have to convince police that they 'just' stole the person's identity.

  73. MBNA by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 3, Informative


    Since losing a credit card number in an online purchase to a dbase hacker, I now use MBNA for all of my online shopping. It gives me a new credit card number everytime I use it, for which I can set an arbitrary $ amount before that number is consumed and also any expiration date for out to a year.

    I generate new numbers using my browser, and even Safari works on OS X. I rest easy knowing that the particular number is set at just over the amount of my purchase, so even if the cc number was compromised it would have no more value attached.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    1. Re:MBNA by cpghost · · Score: 1

      I now use MBNA for all of my online shopping

      This is an american bank, right? Does anybody know of similar services in Europe?

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    2. Re:MBNA by evilviper · · Score: 1

      That's nice and all, but I don't imagine a lot of people are inclined to sign-up for an MBNA account, just to get decent CC security.

      What would surely be useful for most people, is if a major CC company offered similar features on all their cards. This isn't hypothetical, actually, as American Express has been doing this for years now: http://news.com.com/2100-1017-245428.html?legacy=c net

      Can't figure out why Visa or MasterCard haven't done this yet. Perhaps they need to lose a few loyal customers first.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:MBNA by vidarh · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are American, but their European subsidiary offer services at least in the UK, Ireland and Spain. Don't know about the rest of Europe, and don't know if they offer the disposable card number stuff in Europe.

  74. Awesome story by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    Awesome story.

    I really hope someone doesn't post a follow up with a url to an urban legend site.

  75. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Most people don't put condoms on their BALLS, Einstein.

  76. I want in the data base by baomike · · Score: 1

    I want my wants in the data base. Myabe some of the collectors will realise not everyone watche CBS from 1900 to 2300 hours each week nite while drinking schludmiller.

    Recent case in point; took me two months to find an online record store that had a CD by Patricia Nohva
    ( Salut Country) , I happened to like a song of hers
    ( ca va bien) and wanted a copy. Found it at Archambault.ca.

  77. Mod parent down - it's an obvious troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just about every statement which can be verified here is wrong.

    HIS story is probably the one made up. As others have well pointed out, it's just plain wrong.

    The anti-terrorism claim ought to be a tip off to anyone who's actually stayed in a Hotel. Sheesh.

    It looks like he had a successful troll though, unfortunately.

  78. Tin Foil Hat Ovid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use credit cards online all the time. Wake up you fucking luddite.

  79. Revenge by ramblin+billy · · Score: 1


    So lets see...

    2 habitual criminals...needle freaks...computer literate

    who know his name and address...might have seen the geeky looking guy with the shit eating grin in the lobby...or his picture on his blog...or the cops might rub it in

    spending some quality time in the clink...with lots of time to dwell on cause and effect...and maybe even his chest thumping blog...meeting lots of nifty new friends

    oops.

    billy - who suggests at least a 12 gauge

  80. Two junkies in Maxim's... by funtime · · Score: 0

    ...could look a little suspicious.

  81. SSNs mostly not protected in US laws by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative
    The US does have some leftover parts of the Privacy Act of 1974 that occasionally protect people from government collection of their Social Security Number, though Driver's Licenses are now required to collect the number, and many other government activities have gotten permission to demand the number.

    There are private transactions where the government mandates that an individual provide a business with their SSN, primarily anything taxable, like hiring somebody, or opening a bank account that pays interest, and by now they mandate it for most bank accounts even if they don't pay interest, and they mandate it for any medical transaction involving Medicare or most other government-funded health care.

    For transactions where the government does not mandate that a business collect an SSN, they almost never place any restrictions on the business's activities with it, and they don't say that the business can't refuse to deal with you if you don't provide it - you're on your own.

    There are a very small number of cases where some government, mostly state, places limits on private use of SSNs, or otherwise insists on some kinds of privacy protection. But in practice, those are usually not effective.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  82. Cash is better in grocery stores by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Almost every grocery store I've been to has an ATM machine. From a privacy perspective, it's much better to go to the ATM in the store, get some cash, and spend it at the store than it is to pay for your groceries with either the same ATM or a credit card.

    Many grocery stores have their frequent-customer discount cards, which track your purchases if you use them - in my case, "John Doe", who lives at "General Delivery" in my town/zipcode, gets his purchase history recorded, and they're quite happy to correlate my purchases of coffee and Irish whiskey and whipping cream, or tofu and white wine, or tortillas and beer, or catfood and cat litter. No reason for them to know it's me.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Cash is better in grocery stores by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      This is not so true in the UK. ATMs are prevalent, but most insist on charging you about $2-$3 per transaction. This is not worthwhile. Furthermore, most are outdoors, and I certainly don't like getting cash out in front of others.

      Not sure why privacy is screamed so much. If I was up to something or had some kooky/kinky interest, sure, but I only ever buy regular groceries. Privacy is important, sure.. but they could figure out literally nothing from my purchase history.

    2. Re:Cash is better in grocery stores by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Around here ATM's charge $.75 to $3.00 with the lower half of that range being most common.
      However as NONE charge if you bank with atm's owner/sponser/whatever or if you are not a us resident. So I strongly suspect that's a matter of law not policy as everyone's atm's are the same and it's not only less proffitable, but adds complexity to the system.
      So of course all YOU need to do is fly out here to do all your atm transactions :) (or maybe not), but if it's a federal law creating the distinction then should you visit the US you won't at least have to deal with LOCAL atm charges.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    3. Re:Cash is better in grocery stores by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      ATM transactions at banks (even if they're not your own) are free in the UK. However, ATMs in stores, etc, are all part of an independent (commercial) network. I believe the most expensive one is in some club in London, supposedly $20 per withdrawal.

    4. Re:Cash is better in grocery stores by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Where are you going that charges you?

      If your bank is doing this, move you account. Seriously. I've *never* been charged for an ATM transaction, and I've used nearly every kind of ATM.

      (There are some privately run ATMs around.. you can always tell them as they're freestanding and often have a modem wire sticking out of the back. Avoid these like the plague, because they do charge you).

  83. Leaking Testosterone at Age 70? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Hey, if he's doing that, then he probably doesn't need to buy those pills they keep advertising on the Internet....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Leaking Testosterone at Age 70? by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      Don't I wish, don't I wish. But with a little sugar, it takes what would be a serious overdose for most to see any effect. But, the missus till appreciates what I can do occasionally without that stuff. :-)

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
      soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly

  84. They know your name and address... by billstewart · · Score: 1

    At least if your address is the same by the time they get out after their grand theft conviction or whatever...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  85. Happened to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey! I just read that and you should DEFINITELY count yourself lucky! It took CapitalOne 4 days to contact me about the credit card fraud that hit me last month, though BankOne didn't even do a SINGLE thing! What actually happened, is somehow my PayPal account was stolen (how, I have no idea, as I haven't used it or given out any numbers or anything in quite awhile). My PayPal account had my credit card and my checking account on it. They racked up about $4,000 using both, putting me about $1,300 over my limit in my checking account and maxed out my credit card in a matter of 4 days!!! They did all their purchasing online, and as a result of my own research, I found out whoever it is lives in AUSTRALIA!!! Now, I live in the US, so obviously there was no Denny's in my plan... Everything was put back to normal about a week ago, so I actually had absolutely NO FUNDS to draw from for almost a month (I had to wait for a new credit card, and my bank balance was negative)! Good thing I am a relatively poor student who works on tips (valet) so I still had 2 weeks worth of tips to hold me over (a few hundred bucks), and parents who love me LOL! The thing that sucks the most, is that whoever %$#@ed me over is going to get away Scott free... Bastards... Well, just my story. Oh, BTW, CapitalOne was excellent in dealing with the problem, very nice and understanding, while BankOne sucked about it, and PayPal was somewhere in between. I'm just glad it was taken care of... -JB (shnikejsb@aol.com)

  86. Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the parent posters homepage there for irony?

    1. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I left my account logged in ages ago, a friend of mine switched my homepage and I've left it there since. A bit of irony a bit of laziness and a dash of geekiness.

  87. They check in my town. by jgardn · · Score: 1

    People NEVER verify the card holders name to the ID these days so having the actual card stolen from someone is just about as safe.

    Maybe it's because our new city police chief (who has reduced car theft by almost 50% in one year), but every time I buy something in town, I always get carded. And every clerk so far has been careful. The only time they don't is when it is something small, usually less than $20.

    Granted, we don't have an identify theft or credit card problem around here. Maybe it's because our chief is so awesome and she's got everyone being proactive, though.

    Just tonight I ate a good dinner with five and they asked for my ID. They took about 10 seconds to check then recheck it too.

    If you're wondering, Federal Way Washington, and yes, there are tech jobs here and in the surrounding areas.

    Oh, and the car thefts? She has her boys follow the top car thieves around town, all day, and all night. No special tech, no special investigators. Just footwork. And the bastards are dumb enough to try it anyways, even though they know they are being watched.

    Oh, and if you report drugs on the street, they'll post a car in the area at night time. First they track them, then they tag them, and then one night you'll see cop cars busting into houses all over town. Those nights are very quiet except for the police activity. Usually they do it on a Thursday. I guess that's when they find the most stash.

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
  88. Did they have an actual card or just the numbers? by Simulant · · Score: 1


    I rtfa'ed but I don't get this.

    How do you order breakfast at Denny's without an actual card?

    Did they steal a replacement card from his mailbox? They had his cash advance checks so they must have had access to his mail at some point.

    Had his old card expired? Are both the old and new cards active at the same time?

    Just wondering... Maybe I didn't read clearly.

  89. How nice to live life in your own special world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) Most Hotel lobby have camera.
    2) When you punch or hit someone that leave a mark.
    3) The manager whont risk loosing his job for 20$
    4) There is always someone else watching.
    5) The guy get a good lawyer and he can make you look like the son of hitler.And you get the privilege of paying him disability for life.
    6) The guy get a good lawyer and he accuse the cop of beating him , to avoid bad publicity they trow away the case ...

    How nice to live life in your own special world , in reality this guy did the responsible thing.

    Credit Card fraud cost many billions each year, its a proven fact that most of the time people steal credit card in order to commit a bigger crime. Its in our best interest and in the one of the Credit Card company to have agents who specialise in this kind of acts, they should pay for additionnal cops on the force in every country and country. Its called prevention.

  90. summary of remarkable Holmes-like detective work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. You called restaurant where guy just used your card; 2. They told you buyer was staying in nearby hotel, and he was; 3. Police are called; 4. You jazz up story into self-aggrandizing epic.

  91. Re:Agreed by symbolic · · Score: 1


    Keeping information from where it doesn't belong gives cash a VERY high score on my list as well.

  92. Re:Cash cards by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

    Only if his time is worthless. Most of us would not consider our time worthless.
    Even at minimum wage (many of here are eigther in school or making considerably more than that, some both) $80 is only 16 hours.
    And that's exactly what he said, he said in time he valued his losses at more than 8k. Now admittedly it's eigther hyperboly, or he values his time very highly or he's had a LOT of time spent fixing such issues or most likely some mix of the above.
    To anyone else I do realize I've probably just fed a troll, but just in case someone really didn't get it.

    Mycroft

    --
    https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  93. CC fraud protection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The National Bank of Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates has set up their system to send an SMS to a designated phone number every time a transaction is made, telling the account holder how much was charged, at what time, and which shop did the charging.

    This means that within minutes of the card being used, the account holder should be aware if their card has been used fraudulently.

    How hard would it be to set this up for every bank? I'd rather pay for a similar service than inflated charges and greater potential for being defrauded.

  94. CAUTION - PARNET IS A FRUAD by hugesmile · · Score: 0
    Teh parent mesage is a fruad. Donot fall for it. Morderaters pelase mod it down.

    Teh only real way to protect your private information is to make it public, so no one to steal it. case in point teh paperatzi guys chasing movie stars around to take their pictures. The stars that pose willingly are not hassled. and those that want thier privacy are hounded.

    post all private information here, and you'll be safer for it. I gaurantee if you reveal all private information, you will have nothing to lose. 100% gaurantee.

    PS thanks to all of you who have already used Kaaza to share your C: drive including your Turbo Tax .tax files. Those are very helpful.

    - Your Nigerian long lost relative
    Dr. Amatumbu Tiboramaubi

  95. modparentaway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do they.... ? and it is important to "makeaverlongsencentsothemostofthepageisusedbuthts issosullessesidecidetopostasanonmouscowardsoshould you"

  96. On the other hand... by jpellino · · Score: 1

    I had a few grand taken two years ago - including some genius who paid their car insurance. We got the name, address, account number, phone number all in similar fashion to this story. When faced with all this info from me and the bank security team, and the question "what are you going to do to this felon?"
    The Progressive rep's answer was "I guess we'll hafta make them pay cash."
    "But they just committed a FEDERAL OFFENSE!"
    "Well, even criminals have to buy car insurance."

    Verbatim, folks. Ver-freaking-batim.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:On the other hand... by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      The criminals are lucky that they use Progressive and not Geico. That little lizzard would not go so easy on someone who used a stolen credit card. :^)

  97. Unfortunately by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
    That does not apply to debit cards or checks (which nowadays can be used like debit cards). People have thier accounts cleaned out, and they have no recourse.

    The $50 fraud limit needs to be extended to all electronic money trancactions.

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  98. There's no free lunch either... by cpghost · · Score: 1

    Nobody was hurt, I was protected (insured) so I did not lose anything

    You may not have lost anything, but the community did. Do you seriously think that the insurance policies wouldn't get more expensive? Let that happen on a wide scale, and the whole insurance business would be broke.

    You may live in a part of the world where only true and hardened criminals bear arms. You're certainly lucky for this. Unfortunately, we can't affort this kind of luxury in the US.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    1. Re:There's no free lunch either... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      You may live in a part of the world where only true and hardened criminals bear arms. You're certainly lucky for this. Unfortunately, we can't affort this kind of luxury in the US.

      That may be true, but you should also ask yourself why that's the case, and I think it's pretty safe to say that most criminals (namely, the random small-time credit card thieves etc., like the ones mentioned in this case) would not have access to firearms if there were strict rules in place governing who can and cannot buy them. Sure, it ain't going to stop Al Capone, but if everyone can just go to Gun*Mart to buy that new pump-action, then chances are that it'll not just be power-tripping rednecks and concerned home-owners, but also the criminals. All of them, theoretically, and a large percentage in practice.

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    2. Re:There's no free lunch either... by MourningBlade · · Score: 1

      just a quick fact that will work either way in the discussion: more than half (I think it's around 70%) of firearms used in crimes such as robbery were stolen/black-market.

      Of course, you could argue that there are more black-market firearms because there are more white-market firearms to steal, and you could argue that it doesn't matter how many restrictions you place on legal ownership, it's illegal ownership that is the problem.

      Can't say as I know either way, just thought I'd throw the fact in. And, of course, I can't remember where the fact is from, but I think it's from a DOJ report.

  99. Re:Did they have an actual card or just the number by Kredal · · Score: 1

    They phoned in the order to Denny's, then just had to sign the receipt when they picked up the food.

    Not sure how they got the convenience checks... who knows.

    When most cards expire, they send you a new one.. same number, different exp date. They were using the one with the outdated exp date.

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  100. That's exactly when you should use a credit card by benhocking · · Score: 1

    It's imperative that you do use a credit card when you're buying semtex (or other plastic explosives) or anthrax. Just don't use your credit card!

    --
    Ben Hocking
    Need a professional organizer?
  101. They can do Cartwheels too by monk.wal · · Score: 1
    I was snorkeling in http://www.calm.wa.gov.au/national_parks/previous_ parks_month/william_bay.html William Bay (on the south coast of Western Australia) when I saw a http://www.barrierreefaustralia.com/text-only/blue _ringed_octopus_text_only.htm Blue Ring Octopus with all its legs extended cartwheeling along the sandy bottom, propelled by the swell of the ocean.

    Lots of children swim in this bay (I did swimming lessons there) so we caught it and moved it to another location.

    1. Re:They can do Cartwheels too by Anthony · · Score: 1

      You caught it? How? My understanding is that are quite "shy" creatures and only determined people who do things like drag them out of discarded bottles or play with them are at risk of death.

      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  102. Discover does, too by RandyOo · · Score: 1

    Discover Card has similar capabilities, I think the only difference is that they don't let you set the expiry date. Plus you get cash back on your purchases! (up to 2% if you redeem from one of their "partners" that doubles the reward - I always get Sharper Image gift cards and then sell 'em on eBay)

  103. Tired of the fanboys by KalvinB · · Score: 2, Informative

    All his web-sites have not come down.

    www.bootsix.net informs the reader that he's busy on a video project. Most likely he gave persmission to distribute the story and then really didn't care to talk to random fanboys on the net about it.

    It's like writting a fan mail to someone famous, getting a response out of them and then pretending they're dead because they won't continue responding to your letters.

    I've done that many times as the reciever of e-mails from random people. I will typically respond to someone once if they contact me through my web-site's form. After that the chance of a response from me drop quickly to zero. Initial response, and then never heard from again. That's the typical MO of people when talking to people they don't know and don't care to know. He answer'd the ZUG guy's question and that's all be felt compelled to be obliged to.

    The big mistake that Bobby Johnny made was registering the power book site (which is his own site BTW so another one that isn't shut down) under his own name and home address.

    So if the guy wanted to fly across the ocean and whack him, he could. But most likely Bobby just didn't care to continue some long conversation with the ZUG guy and has better things to do as mentioned on his main site; the video project.

    But I have to say, assuming he's dead leads to a more interesting ending.

    I'd say he's just tired of the fanboys and has moved on with his life.

  104. Re:Don't Shred: Request the CC company not send th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't even have to call Discover to stop the checks, go to their website, login, and send them the request electronically.

    Worked for me.

    And while you're there, check out their one-time CC number generator for on-line transactions. Amex used to have one too, but dropped it. Guess which CC I use for shopping on-line?

    I tend to travel a lot for work. I put a lot of stuff on my personal card when I do (get paid per diem for expenses). How does their fraud department not alarm when a charge suddenly shows up in Honolulu on my card? Hmm, maybe they've figured out that all those microbrewery stops are legit.

  105. Why always blame the internet? by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

    I do, however, try to be careful about not letting anyone get information about me they shouldn't and I rarely, if ever, use a credit card online. This is why I was surprised to find out one morning that identity thieves had racked up thousands of dollars one two of my credit cards.

    A good sign that the internet is not to blame for all of our problems. It's more likely that someone you gave the card to offline was the one who stole it. It's a lot easier for a petty thief to, for example, jot down your info at a restaurant as they process your card out of view than it is to steal it from some database.

    --
    this is my sig
  106. Vests in public by StupidKatz · · Score: 1

    No kidding. If I'd have seen him wearing that vest, I would have had no choice but to attempt to assault him, too.

  107. Yeah, but headshots aren't exactl;y easy. by caveat · · Score: 1

    I've never been involved in a shoot situation (though I do carry), but from what I've heard, in the heat of combat, with a moving, bobbing, bouncing, relatively small target (that's shooting back), a clean headshot is mighty difficult. Not that it's not someting to try for - but I personally would probably use the Mozambique drill. Two quick shots in the body, onbe careful head shot. Takes a bit to master, but it's pretty much foolproof (.357 w/125gr JHPs :D) If the baddie isn't armored, the two COM shots should work, and even if he is, they'll give him pause long enough for you to draw a bead on his head.

    Of course, then there's the "trunk gun" philosophy; carrying a BFG in your car for a prolonged shootout like the TX incident. Myself, I keep a 7.62x51 semiauto, but that's more in case I get the random desire to stop by the range rather than the possibility of a shootout with armored bad guys.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  108. thats a fantastic post! by museumpeace · · Score: 1

    you WILL RTFA. the moral of the story is near the bottom: ALWAYS tear up those stupid cash-advance "checks" that your credit card co. sends.
    makes me so happy to hear this because I always rip em up to bits and put half the bits in a trash can and half in the paper recycle.

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
  109. Despite the slashdotting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    p-p-p-powerbook.com is still up. Maybe he is alive after all.

  110. sadly.. by TheJOsh!(tm) · · Score: 1
    I have "SEE ID" written on the back of all my cards, and I am sad to say that maybe 2/3 of the purchases i make, i do not get ID'd. this is esp. annoying when the clerk actually looks at the back of the card and still doesn't ask. i've even taken to "signing" See ID when this happens.

    being a sales person and dealing with large transactions all day, i am well aquainted with checking IDs. if it says check, i check. if it's not signed, i check. if it's smudged, i check. if there is ANY doubt in my mind, i make some excuse about being severely far sighted and not having my glasses with me...

    usually the people offer up the ID without a fuss, some act pleasantly supprised that their credit is being taken seriously. I've only had a few that made a fuss (so far they've all been valid), but i "blame" it on store policy and joke about not wanting to lose my job, and they agree.

    and to the GP poster, I work at Bestbuy, not all of us are dumb schmucks.. :)

    --
    Rise up in the cafeteria and STAB them with your plastic forks!
  111. This is cool. by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    The guy seems to have a level head, rather than trying to confront the people, he simply invetigates, and calls the police. Nothing wrong with that.

    But keep this in mind:

    The credit card companies called him. GOOD. That is what they are supposed to do. Further, HE wasn't stolen from; the merchants were. The merchants were carless and took risks with credit cards.
    Visa/Discover will not pay anyone for the illegal charges, as they can't prove the charges were authorized (with, say, a signature).

    Although I'm sure I would try to do the same thing in the same situation, a part of me would want to say "Why should I bother? I use my credit card as a convenience, and fraud protection is one of those conveniences. I don't use it so I can go chasing people around, that's not my problem. The merchants took the risk."

  112. Your story is inconsistent... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to catch these shitheats. Victoria's Secret has their shipping address, so I think it should be pretty easy to get that address, call the police, and have justice done. [...] I call Victorias Secret. They say they can only give the shipping address out to a police officer/detective conducting an investigation

    OK, sounds reasonable.

    "But I just called them! They don't care about who did this. They sent me to the local PD, and they sent me to you,"

    BZZZZT. Wrong.

    You called them, and they would not give you the address. That does *not* mean that they don't care, and that they haven't called the police themselves. All it means is that they won't tell you.

  113. Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod Parent Up

  114. My credit card theft by lopgok · · Score: 1

    I was picking my truck from an expensive repair ($6000 new engine ruined by a mechanic (their insurance paid for most of it)), and I paid with my credit card. The clerk said I had exceeded my limit. I said no way.

    I called the credit card company, and they said also said I exceeded my limit. They told me that on Friday (it was currently Monday) someone had purchased $4000 of computer stuff from a company I had never heard of. They asked if it was my purchase. I said no. They asked if another purchase on Friday at the same computer store for $3000 was mine. I said no. They asked about another purchase for $2000. I said I have never heard of that computer store. The card company seemed a bit confused.

    I said that the transactions were fraud. When the heard the f-word, they quickly transferred me to the fraud department. They said they had to check something about the 3 transactions. They said something like "the merchant didn't do something, so we don't have to pay". I suspect that the stuff was to be shipped somewhere other than my address and the merchant didn't ask for the security code on the back of the card, but the credit card company wouldn't say.

    They said they have just cancelled my card, and they are mailing me a new card. I said swell, but I have pick up my car. They said they would temporarily raise the credit limit by $6000, and while I was on the phone the clerk should run the card, then they would cancel the card. I told the clerk this (they had been listening since I was using their phone), and they ran the card which accepted the charge. The card was cancelled just after the transasction.

    I never found out how the card number was stolen. I did go to Bank of America had them take a picture of me and emboss it on the card. This is great when bying something in person, and completely useless over the phone or internet.

  115. Get it straight about cost of credit card fraud by fingerfucker · · Score: 1

    It's real money that the merchants, banks, and card processors have to cough up. Where do you think it comes from? Higher merchandise prices (or, eroded retail margins, and fewer mom-and-pop retailers as a result), higher bank fees, and higher transaction fees. All of that, all of it, trickles down to the paying consumer in one way or the other.

    While credit card fraud certainly does trickle down to the consumer, it is most certainly NOT the bank or credit card companies who cough up the money. Not a dime.

    If you were a merchant, you would know that every time a credit card transaction is claimed fraudulent by a customer, the credit card processing institution charges back the merchant for the FULL AMOUNT of the questionable transaction plus extra fees (to cover a brief administrative process to find out more details about the transaction from both the customer and the merchant).

    So remember this: The cost of EVERY fraudulent credit card transaction is initially passed on ONLY to the merchant - they are the ones who have to cough up the money, so they will be the ones RAISING PRICES to you and me.

  116. Discover Card Secure Numbers by PicoTera · · Score: 1

    Discover card lets you obtain a seperate number for each merchant. The number can be used multiple times by that merchant, but not by anyone else. You get a new Secure number by logging onto Discover and requesting one, or you can have a destop version that stays active for 15 minutes. Works for me.

    --
    Carbon Unit # 149-34-xxxx
  117. You are very likely made up.. by Schwern · · Score: 2, Informative

    And just to add a little more credit, I'm his roomate. Yes its true. You can check my rep if you like. Have fun.

    Also the local news boys, KOIN Channel 6, just left. Ovid will be on the news at 11 tonite.

  118. Re:Cash cards by Kombat · · Score: 1

    You missed the joke. Read it again. 0 times 100 is still 0.

    --
    Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  119. Hahaha. I'd love to see that one. by lorcha · · Score: 1

    Judge: I see you are filing against the police or Victoria's Secret. What is the amount of your actual monetary damages?
    bani: Uhhh... uhhhh....
    Judge: Did I stutter?
    bani: Well, I did not incur any actual monetary damages, Victoria's Secret did.
    Judge: Let me get this straight, you are suing Victoria's Secret because they suffered damages?
    bani: Well, someone on this website "slashdot" told me I should file in SCC against...
    Judge: Get the fuck out of my courtroom you degenerate fuck. Stop wasting my time.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  120. What we need is a FAQ - get cops to work by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

    I applaud the guy for being able to make a policeman move without applying 20,000,000 volts.

    My wife's computer was stolen. We saw her ICQ account pop up online - the thief hadn't even bothered to wipe it. We tracked down the IP, but Patrolman DonutMuncher apparently wasn't interested in even calling the ISP to get an address. It wasn't the computer we cared about but family heirlooms which were stolen at the same time. Unfortunately, police work is sometimes work.

    Where we live now, the cops couldn't bother to show up, to, say two thugs threatening to attack a pregnant woman (a racially motivated attack, too) even though they're LEANING AGAINST A SQUAD CAR HALF A BLOCK AWAY.

    This guy wants us to believe that he was able to talk cops into going back and forth to arrest these guys? Please tell me where you live, man! I might respect cops again if I can find a jurisdiction in which they actually do work, rather than raping and torturing prostitutes and shooting their wives to avoid paying child support .

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  121. Re:Hahaha. I'd love to see that one. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you think monetary damages are required for a successful lawsuit then you are one truly stupid fuck.

  122. Nice one. by lorcha · · Score: 1

    You have obviously never filed a lawsuit in small claims court before. Wake me up when you have.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  123. The best part of the joke is the irony... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The funniest part is where Jeff scams other people to pay for his alleged prank, and they fall for it and send Jeff money to pay to ship it, then write about it on the web with no sense of the dramatic irony playing out around them.

  124. Wants and Needs by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

    > Why can't they have their cake and eat it too? E.g. shoot you in the back right after you start running, and then stop and pick up the money. It's not as if both you and the money are running in opposite directions and they have to choose between them...

    The idea is that most thieves don't want your life, just your cash. If you drop the cash and back away, the thief will just collect the cash and beat it. They won't shoot you to stop you, because they don't want to shoot you (if they did, they wouldn't bother with a holdup, they'd just plug you and rifle your pockets). However, this theory has a down side, in that if you're facing someone with a firearm, you don't want to startle them. In that case, drop the cash and back away slowly, and don't worry about the money. Leaving with your health and an empty wallet is better by far than getting shot at.

    Virg