Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X Tiger Goes Gold

bonch writes "Following up yesterday's story, AppleInsider now reports that Tiger build 8A428 has been deemed the Gold Master for shipping. Sources expect an announcement of Tiger's completion sometime tomorrow." There are far better days to make a product announcement, should a company wish to be taken seriously, but it worked for Gmail!

562 comments

  1. Let's not forget by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apple was founded on an April Fools Day, so this would really be an anniversary event.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apple was founded on an April Fools Day

      Ha! Finally it occured to you!

      Had you fooled for quite some time, huh?

      You forgot the quotes around "founded", though.

      Obviously, we're just a division of Microsoft and no company, so now you know where the money you buy Mac's for goes.

      I must say I thought it was apparent to you guys though... Mac's and OS X users usually serve as a testbed for new technologies we at Microsoft are coming up with, that we can later choose to incorporate in our flagship product Windows if the Mac users like them.

      And you always thought it was two completely different companies, one often "ripping off" the other.

      Ha ha.

      Steve Jobs
      *cough* CEO, Apple *giggle*

    2. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, longhorn was designed with most of the features that tigers has, and has been in development longer, so i dont know about that

    3. Re:Let's not forget by iBod · · Score: 1

      Looks like this April 1st will be another momentous day for Steve Jobs...

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/04/01/steve_jobs _joins_ikea/

    4. Re:Let's not forget by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      Since when was WINDOWS Microsoft's flagship product?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  2. expect... by igny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    shortage of mac minis in the coming weeks

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    1. Re:expect... by paulius_g · · Score: 1

      I do hope that new Minis will ship with Tiger. I'm still waiting for the second generation, expecting lower price and better performance.

    2. Re:expect... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are people that have been waiting for Tiger before ordering a mini. It seems that the Apple Store has caught up on the 1.25GHz mini orders (ships same business day), the 1.42GHz minis are still 5-7 days to shipping.

    3. Re:expect... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It might not move as many as you think. The people in the market for a mini (the archtypical 'switcher') don't really follow OS releases.

      OTOH, I've had 'wait until Tiger' in the back of my head when thinking about getting a Mac.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    4. Re:expect... by qzulla · · Score: 1

      Why?

      q

    5. Re:expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although parent is probably a troll, it is actually a good question. Why wait for the next Mac release?

      By the time it is available, you will already be hearing the hype and rumors about the following release. And you know you are going to have to pay full retail price for that anyway (that's the Apple business model, after all). So just go ahead and buy now.

    6. Re:expect... by yuriismaster · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think I can answer that for him...

      While this list may answer your questions, I seriously reccomend viewing the '05 Keynote from San Fransico

      http://www.apple.com/quicktime/qtv/mwsf05/

      1. Spotlight: I'm sure you probably know about it by now. Super-quick searching of everything evar!

      2. Dashboard: Quick lookup-info and go thing. Try something remarkably similar at http://www.konfabulator.com/ but think of Dashboard as faster.

      3. Automator: Like writing small shell scripts to replace you, but way better/gui'fied. Application developers can use AppleScripts to create more robust workflows. (Save your pr0n images faster than ever before!)

      4. More optimization: Like most .upgrades, things are looking a lot faster.

      Visit http://www.apple.com/macosx/ for more info

    7. Re:expect... by ChesterTanuki · · Score: 1

      Well unless you live in the USA, shortages are already a fact.

      I have been waiting almost 2 months for the Mac Mini I ordered, and I was told the other day that it could be yet another "several months" in coming. I can understand Australia being lower on Apple's list of priorites, but this is ridiculous.

      I will be cancelling my order. So long Apple, and thanks for the Kool Aid. You can wait for a time when I need a new computer, not just want one.

      I'll try to refrain from further stamping of my feet in vexation - I doubt they really care...

    8. Re:expect... by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but I expect a lot of forthcoming OS X software will be Tiger-only once it takes hold. The new developer frameworks (I'm especially fond of Core Data) are just too good to pass up.

    9. Re:expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a switcher. But I am waiting for Tiger to get my next Mac. The Mac mini looks prime for pure convenience in desktop computing. I don't need my old bulky Mac anymore!

    10. Re:expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd probably have better results dealing with a store (Apple Store or a third party) then ordering online.

    11. Re:expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are wrong on this one. Laypeople may not know Tiger from Silvester the Cat, but when they try out Mac minis at computer stores and see all the eye candy of Aqua and usability of Tiger and full power of Unix, they maybe impressed enough to take out the wallet. Tiger will help the adoptation rate of Mac hardware (switchers + adders), IMHO.

    12. Re:expect... by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, any product that's listed as "same day" is over stocked. Apple's supply-chain management is very tight. The company does not intend for products to sit on shelves waiting for orders to come in. A 2-3 day shipping window is what the company shoots for. If the product can ship the same day, that means orders have been slower than anticipated.

      I ... um ... have no idea what relevance this might have on anything. But I thought you might find it interesting.

    13. Re:expect... by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      why not take a trip to frigen singapore and just buy one? or how about going down to the local reseller and get one? christ all mighty.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    14. Re:expect... by ChesterTanuki · · Score: 1

      I did order it from an Apple store. The computers are supposedly all being assembled in the US to order and shipped over to Australia complete. So if you added extras (like me), it would presumably throw even more spanners in the works.



      Apparently all Mac Minis bound for Australia are being held up for this long time - a few weeks ago I was told that it was because of a shortage of superdrives, but now it's obvious that its a shortage of, well, Mac Minis. Figures.

    15. Re:expect... by lamz · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am one of those people. OS X 10.4, new Quicken and new iLife, purchased separately, would cost almost as much as a Mac mini.

      As soon as Mac mini's are shipping with OS X 10.4, I'm ordering one. And if they're shipping with a coupon, or OS X 10.3 on the HD with a 10.4 updater, even better! It will make it easier to install 10.4 on my other Macs.

      I managed to pull that one off a few years ago when I bought my iMac G4 17". It had 10.1 on the HD with a 10.2 updater disc in the box.

      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    16. Re:expect... by oritpro · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I will be getting a mini as well once they start shipping with Tiger installed (not a coupon), and in fact have been holding off for just this reason.

      Being a *nix guy, I can hardly wait!

    17. Re:expect... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Yea but is this like a Redhat 7 - 7.1 switch or a win 98 to win 98Se type switch?

      Osx has AMAZING press people just love the damn thing, Tiger sounds like an upgrade not a bug hunt.

    18. Re:expect... by LadyLucky · · Score: 3, Informative
      Gah, speak for yourself. My Mac Mini has been on order for 2 months.

      That seems to be what happens when you are low priority - Apple New Zealand sources from Apple Australia, which itself can't satisfy its own demand.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    19. Re:expect... by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      You mean, that the status quo will extend itself into April... No kidding, I was at a local apple reseller recently and they still had a backorder list of around 45 minis and only could deliver 5 so far!

    20. Re:expect... by thesixthreplicant · · Score: 0
      for instance, at the time of Tiger's release, I predict that
      1. all Mac's will come with 512MB RAM preinstalled, and
      2. the Mac mini will get 64MB Video RAM

      But these are just a guess (1. I'm certain of, 2. is just a wishful-thinking-guess)

    21. Re:expect... by DenDave · · Score: 1

      In EU it is the same.. and we're freakin' next to Ireland where they supposedly make the puppies..

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    22. Re:expect... by robbieduncan · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a common mistake. Some Macs are assembled in Ireland, normally PowerMacs, but it's mostly a depot/warehouse. All Mac Minis are made in China.

    23. Re:expect... by eclectic4 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Interesting. I would want the full version CDs, no doubt. You should do an "archive and install" when doing this update anyway, and, if you ever need to reinstall the OS to the machines in the future, you would have to first install 10.3, and then the updater again. With the full install you wouldn't have to do so.

      No, having the full install is by far the better option IMO, but, that's just me...

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    24. Re:expect... by eclectic4 · · Score: 1

      Um, the only reason, the only one as to why a Mac mini would even be in the running for many "switchers" is the OS. I think they are aware of Tiger. Remember, it's a Mini, the OS is the only reason... a good one, but the only one.

      --

      "The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge." - Daniel Boorstin
    25. Re:expect... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      First, OS X is distributed on DVD. The mini's 10.3 has 5+GB of stuff on it, iLife '05 is 4+ GB. Even the OS 9 disc is a DVD.

      FWIW, it looks like iLife '05 is included as a full version on DVD. The older version of iLife is pre-installed on minis.

      Having a full version CD of 10.4 is desirable to me, doesn't a full version it include the option to upgrade too?

      I think I'd get an external hard drive to experiment with 10.4 before fully commiting to it, because it is effectively, 10.4.0, a .0 release may be buggy.

    26. Re:expect... by PaxTech · · Score: 2, Informative
      Don't count on it working. I bought a dual G5 a few months before iLife '05 came out, but I held off buying it since my employer was buying some Mac Minis, and I thought I'd just "borrow" an iLife installer disk from one of them.

      The installer knew that I wasn't installing on a Mini though, so it refused to install.

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    27. Re:expect... by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      Yea but is this like a Redhat 7 - 7.1 switch or a win 98 to win 98Se type switch?

      Well, it's not OS XI, but all the OS X upgrades have had a lot of useful features added and faster performance than the previous point releases.

      I never really used 10.2, so I can't say everything that changed, but I got my Mac last March, and it had 10.3. I do know that the most useful feature I have ever found in an OS, Expose, was added to 10.3, and was not in 10.2. Also I think Finder was improved from 10.2 to 10.3.

      As for what's coming in 10.4 that isn't in 10.3 that I'm looking forward to? Here's my list:

      Spotlight: Uber fast searching of my hard drive, even looking in PDF files for my search keyword, works like the search function in iTunes, only for the entire hard drive. Also enables smart folders in many applications to auto store things I look for a lot.

      Automator: Scripting for people like me, who haven't yet learned AppleScript. GUI scripter, looks incredibly easy to use, and might get used a lot for me when I make photo CDs and such for friends.

      iChat AV improvements: 10 person audio chat, 4 person video chat. since I love using my iSight, I should get a ton of use out of this.

      Core Video: might even make my iBook work well for video editing (not counting on this, though, it is only an iBook G4).

      True 64 bit support in the OS: For when I get my G5. Mmmmmm.

      RSS in Safari: I use Safari more on my Mac than I use Firefox on my Mac. I have Firefox for it, but I find Safari works easier for me for most pages... might have something to do with the way Firefox is coded for the Mac, though.

      Those are the main features, besides the speed boost all programs should get like there was between 10.2 and 10.3

    28. Re:expect... by Ansonmont · · Score: 1

      Also, its cool looking. Small, you know.

    29. Re:expect... by shotfeel · · Score: 4, Informative

      AFAIK, Apple has never shipped "just an updater" for a paid update (of course my memory gets fuzzy when you get back before System 7). Its always been the full OS (which comes on DVD these days). That was always a nice touch as apposed to the install DOS-install Win 3.1-Upgrade to Win 95... process involved with a certain other company.

      Even with the "free" ($20) upgrades some have gotten in the past, Apple has shipped the entire OS on the CD(s). Its just that the installer checked to make sure you have the previous version before starting the installation process (you could still do a full archive and install). In fact, it didn't take long for people to figure out the trick and image the upgrade CD to disk, remove the bit that checked for the previous system, then burn the "fixed" image to another CD.

    30. Re:expect... by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking it's going to be at least a year before there are enough must-have apps that are Tiger only to induce upgrades.

      OTOH I'm ready to upgrade today!

    31. Re:expect... by SunCrushr · · Score: 1

      Sure.
      Maybe if your running a third rate crappy distributor who doesn't care about getting products to the customer in a timely fashion.

      I work for CDW. We are not a third rate crappy distributor, and we pride outselves on our inventory control and supply chain management.

      We have people on staff in our purchasing department whose sold job it is to anticipate market needs and keep certain key products in stock in our warehouse so that we can ship them on the same day they are ordered. This is especially handy when you have a lot of goverment contracts to fill. These orders can be very time critical.

      When we advertise "Same Day" on a product, that means it can ship on the same day it is ordered, becuase it is currently in stock. It doesn't automatically mean that we overstocked that item and that orders are slower than anticipated. If we ran this company like that, we would have ran it into the ground a long time ago. Instead, through carefull control, we have flourished, even when the economy was tanking.

      The last thing we want is for product to sit on our shelves. Our product shipping turnover is very fast, and in most cases, a product won't sit in the warehouse very long because of the hard work our purchasing people do to predict what will be needed to fill our customers needs in a timely manner.

      Any distributor worth anything doesn't shoot for a 2-3 day shipping window. They shoot for same day shipping on as many orders as possible. The reason for this is both customer retention and sataisfaction, as well as to maximize profits. An order sitting in your system because a product isn't in stock looses your company money every day in order maintenance costs. These costs are small, but when you process thousands of orders a day, they can add up. Also, an order doesn't make you any money until its scanned onto the truck when it ships out. So you aren't making any money by making the order take longer to ship, you are simply loosing customers to the guy who can ship faster.

      A 2-3 day shipping window, while realistic, isn't very competitive, and won't win you customers, especially in the government sector. In this business, the aim is to make money, and you make money by selling product and shipping it quickly, as well as by being helpful and having good service. Timely is the word here people. Timely. That means shpping the same day, not in 2-3 days.

    32. Re:expect... by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do realize that Apple's not a distributor, right? We're a manufacturer. We don't have to worry about losing a sale because of a 2-day shipping delay, because we make what we sell. You can't get a Mac unless you get it from us. Sure, if we can't ship it to you quickly enough you might pick up the phone and call one of our other customers -- like CDW, say -- and get it from them, but that's irrelevant to us. We've already sold it at that point.

      Your goal, as a reseller, is to have inventory sitting on the shelf so you can fill orders quickly in order to compete with other resellers. That's how you do business.

      Our goal, as a manufacturer, is to never build a single thing unless it's already sold. We can't do that, practically, because we can't sell something unless we've already built it, but we try to get as close to that as possible. We don't have warehouses. We don't sit on inventory waiting for the phone to ring. We don't pride ourselves on having things in stock. Just the opposite.

      Our two companies live in completely different universes. You're silly to try to compare them.

    33. Re:expect... by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      CDW is a distributor, not a manufacturer. JIT is a bigger deal in manufacturing because having a warehouse is less aligned with the core business. Apple saves money if they can operate as small a warehouse as they can get away with. So would CDW, but the nature of your business demands that you store at least some product.

      Now, JIT taken to an extreme can be bad, as your example illustrates ("ship it today or we find someone else").

      You're right about the desirable window being less than two days though. My custom iBook went ~36 hours from ordered to shipped - good enough for me.

    34. Re:expect... by SunCrushr · · Score: 1

      Sorry sorry...
      In my morning stupor I seemd to have failed to notice that you were talking about a manufacturer and for some reason my brain made me think you were talking about all distribution in general, not manufacturing. My bad.

      By the way, if you guys at Apple do aim for a 2-3 day turnaround, then congrats, because from what I've seen, you routinely beat that turnaround a lot.
      Keep up the good work, and thanks for the correction, as well as the great contributions to technology. :)

    35. Re:expect... by CameronGary · · Score: 1

      My Mini came with iLife '05 pre-installed, whereas the earlier ones were as your describe. I got mine in late February.

  3. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Great now I wonder if it will run on my spanky new G3 iMac i just bought off ebay.

    And where can I buy it in Little Ole' Texarkana, Arkansas

    1. Re:Great! by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Interesting

      actually, apple's been really good with supporting old hardware provided you stuff it with enough ram.

      my G4-450 tower is over 6 years old, and works great with the latest version of OS X Panther -- everything is just as snappy as it is on my fairly new powerbook (as far as the os is concerned...). I've been using the latest release of final cut pro on it without a problem for the past few weeks.

      can you say that you can use a 6-year old PC without any siginificant upgrades and still run the latest OS and software and be productive with it? Paying $2000 for a machine that will last 6 years is definitely justifiable compared to paying $1000 for a mediocre machine that lasts 2.5 years.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    2. Re:Great! by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Gah, well that depends on the program you want to run. World of Warcraft is kind of right out for this little 233Mhz strawberry iMac I have next to me. Even though the RAM is maxed out. :(

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    3. Re:Great! by paulius_g · · Score: 1

      I also got an old iMac which is waiting for resurection. Wonder if the search features will be fast on 233mhz!

    4. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ya know, the moderaters are idiots, but it's only in the Apple threads where it really shines.

      (parent is marked 'troll' as I post this.)

    5. Re:Great! by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      New releases of OS X generally run faster than older ones because the OS is relatively new and optimizations are keeping pace with feature adds.

      The one thing you'll want is a decent amount of memory. 128 mb hasn't been enough for any previous version, and it's doubtful it'll be enough for 10.4.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    6. Re:Great! by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      Officially, I believe that it needs built-in FireWire and a DVD drive. However, that may just be to stop people installing it on ancient 233 MHz models.

    7. Re:Great! by jdwest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That was my experience, exactly. A couple of colleagues and me managed to stave off a Windows-only mandate my college had adopted with a similar message. We stuck our collective necks out to challenge this policy by saying we could upgrade from 9.2 to Panther, plus 21 sticks of 256 MB modules and save a ton of money on our Replace-A-Lab-Every-Three-Years(TM) plan.

      These boxes (five-year-old G4 466s/30MB) cost a pretty penny in their day, but there was really nothing wrong with them, save one or two failed HDDs. They are used for introductory graphics courses and Photoshop labs, and even compared to today's blazers, they are perfect for a teaching environment.

      The lab, which is utilized about 26 hours a week, is well into its second semester with nary a hiccup and ZERO maintenance.

      I don't know if it will change the mind of our 'Doze-centric admin in the long run, but I admit I chuckle when a two-month old Dell lab box gets pwn3d or upchucks on its own hardware far more frequently than it should.

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    8. Re:Great! by kongjie · · Score: 1
      Yeah, tell me about it. I just ended my WoW subscription and trashed the files--after leveling my toon up to lvl 60, I've found that my performance on a 933mhz G4 (1.5 gigs RAM) with an upgraded video card to a Radeon 9000 is too crappy to enable me to enjoy the game experience. 9.5 FPS in instance dungeons (and if a bunch of mobs spawn/rush forward at the same time, that drops to under 5 FPS, aka unplayable).

      And I wouldn't think that a mini would be up to the task, either--not with the 9200 card and 32mb.

      Not being able to play WoW isn't a big enough justification for the thousands I would need to upgrade...especially since everything else is working fine.

    9. Re:Great! by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm pretty sure it's possible to install on those machines with XPostFacto.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    10. Re:Great! by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "can you say that you can use a 6-year old PC without any siginificant upgrades and still run the latest OS and software and be productive with it?

      Sure. As long as you're not married to Windows.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    11. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      World of Warcraft is not a program. It's a game.

      Okay, maybe it's a game that is made from programs or technically a program because it runs on a computer but in the end it's a game.

      Go to someone's house. Interact with them. Play on their damn computer!

    12. Re:Great! by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Firstly, your G4/450 tower isn't over 6 years old, because they were released August 31, 1999.

      can you say that you can use a 6-year old PC without any siginificant upgrades and still run the latest OS and software and be productive with it?

      Certainly. Not to mention the UI being a hell of a lot more responsive while doing it as well. Windows XP is quite usable on any P2 class machine if you bulk it up with enough RAM.

      FYI, a PC of roughly the same era as your G4 (mid 1999) would be something along the lines of a 600Mhz P3 and would have cost substantially less. Or you could have had a dual ~450Mhz P3 for about the same price as your G4 (~US$2500).

    13. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Dell Dimension T550 that's six years old. With 256 mb SDRAM and the same old 20 gb 7200 rpm IBM hard disk (I have the 75GXP--the notoriously unreliable one) and it works completely fine for normal web browsing, word processing, light development. And it shows no signs of slowing.

      Don't be a snob.

    14. Re:Great! by Keruo · · Score: 1

      > can you say that you can use a 6-year old PC without any siginificant upgrades and still run the latest OS and software and be productive with it?

      My w2k3 domain controllers are p3 500MHz with 256Mb ram, and those are running without complaining too much.
      Performance logs show constant cpu load around 30 to 60% but the system works just fine even under load.
      Only significant upgrade was the extra 128Mb ram.
      And these machines were closer to $1000 than $2000 per piece when bought.

      --
      There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
    15. Re:Great! by mdarksbane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Although I agree with you about the quality and longevity of Apple's hardware (my dad still runs a G4 400 with an upgraded HDD as a recording studio and sees no need for a new system), nothing says you need a new windows system, either.

      I'm stuck on a Celeron 700 at work. Nothing CLOSE to my preferred dev environment, I assue you. However, for the test scripts they've got me writing in vbscript, I never have any speed issues. It serves its purpose perfectly well.

      The truth of old hardware is that if properly maintained it will be exactly as good as it was when you bought it.

    16. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Dad runs WinXP SP2 on my old P3 600, and it works fine (well as fine as any windows box can). It does all he needs it to do, wich is mainly Pagemaker, indesign and photoshop, it just wont play World of Warcraft, or any other recent games.

    17. Re:Great! by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny you should bring this up. I just finished -- and I mean just finished, like ten minutes ago -- a weekly column that I write. I loaned my PowerBook for a few days to someone who needed it more than I did, so I wrote it on a six-year-old iBook with a 300 MHz G3 processor and 256 MB of RAM.

      This computer runs 10.3.8, and the application I used was Adobe InCopy 3.

      It worked perfectly. Zero complaints. The only way I could tell the difference between the iBook and my PowerBook is the size of the screen. Of course, I wasn't running any other applications at the time; if I had been, I would have run out of RAM. But apart from that one constraint, I used it in exactly the same way I normally use my laptop, and noticed no difference in functionality or speed.

    18. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      http://store.apple.com

      In that order.

    19. Re:Great! by pboulang · · Score: 1
      yeah, I'm not sure that achieves the "and be productive" requirement. Domain controllers don't do a heck of a lot.. DNS,DHCP, File Sharing, Print Sharing, User Authentication... these all are minimal load. Obviously they are quite useful services in their own right, but none require a front end with alpha blending, etc..

      I seriously laughed at the blazing speed of an NT 4.0 box just the other day with just about the same sysem specs you mention... a simple front end like file manager absolutely blew me away with how snappy it was.

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    20. Re:Great! by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're on a Mac running Safari right now, you can right-click or ctrl-click on the "comment" field for slashdot submissions and tick "Spelling -> Check Spelling as you Type". The word "resurection" would be underlined in red and you could right-click or ctrl-click on it to correct it. I'm not nitpicking about spelling, but I actually think it's a neat feature that not many Mac users are aware of for posting on the net. It's a system-wide feature for text fields in OS X, just a neat little insight into the design quality of what goes on under the hood.

    21. Re:Great! by X_Caffeine · · Score: 1
      re: can you say that you can use a 6-year old PC without any siginificant upgrades and still run the latest OS and software and be productive with it?

      Well, yes. I just upgraded a 6-year-old Celeron 333mhz laptop (only significant upgrade is a boost from 64 to 192mb RAM) to XP, and it runs great. Boots as fast as 98, as stable as Win2k. Oh, I did turn off the shadows, animated menus, etc. But basically it runs superbly.

      A lot of non-Windows users seem to be under the impression that XP is somehow nearly-equivalent to OS X -- i.e. a new operating system with new-computer requirements. It's not, it's just a splash of paint on Windows 2000, which in turn is just WinNT with plug-n-play, which is basically a 1998-era OS.

      Which isn't to say it's a particularly good OS, or that I would recommend it to anyone (I don't), but XP does what it does just great on old hardware.

      --
      // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
    22. Re:Great! by Golias · · Score: 1

      Not being able to play WoW isn't a big enough justification for the thousands I would need to upgrade

      Install more memory.

      I play WoW all the time on a 1.42 GHz mini ($600) with 1 GB of RAM installed (under $200), and it runs great at 1280x720 on my HDTV projector.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    23. Re:Great! by localman · · Score: 1

      Memory: get 512MB for normal usage. Anything less and you will be unhappy. This is from my experience, and also what my wife who works at the apple store has seen with customers.

      If you're doing some major media stuff (editing huge images, or doing substantial audio/video work) you'll want to get 1GB.

      Cheers.

    24. Re:Great! by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      "can you say that you can use a 6-year old PC without any siginificant upgrades and still run the latest OS and software and be productive with it?

      Sure. As long as you're not married to Windows.


      Actually we have 1997 200mhz laptops that came with 80mb of RAM and 5gb Hard Drives, they are used in testing and for diagnostics when a tech doesn't want to drag a new laptop out or needs one that still has the good old serial and parallel ports.

      They run WindowsXP (even with Themes turned on), and benchmark almost 20% faster in applications than they do if we swap hard drives and run Win98 on the poor suckers.

      I think they pretty much qualify for some of the lower end equipment, and techs even have Windows media Player 10 on them, and watch videos and use them as jukeboxes. It is quite amusing actually.

      But as for the tied to Windows thing, not true.

      XP can get a lot of performance out of a computer, especially considering these laptops are running faster with XP for the techs now then when our company bought them in 1997 and was running Win95 or Beta Win98 on them.

    25. Re:Great! by MojoStan · · Score: 1
      I'd mod you up if I had mod points, but I'll add to your comments instead...

      Firstly, your G4/450 tower isn't over 6 years old, because they were released August 31, 1999.

      Actually, they were only announced on August 31, 1999. They didn't ship until October 1999, with the G4/450 being the top model and the G4/500 being delayed until 2000. "Over 6 years old" was one heck of an exaggeration or miscalculation. The fastest Mac six years ago was a G3 without AGP.

      FYI, a PC of roughly the same era as your G4 (mid 1999) would be something along the lines of a 600Mhz P3...

      In October 1999 (the month the G4 actually shipped), the P3 was available at 733Mhz.

      ...and would have cost substantially less. Or you could have had a dual ~450Mhz P3 for about the same price as your G4 (~US$2500).

      The G4/450 was priced at $2500 when it was announced on August 31, 1999, but the price was raised to $3500 on October 14 when the G4/500 was delayed.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    26. Re:Great! by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 1

      I loaned my PowerBook for a few days

      You write a weekly column and use the word "loaned"? :)

    27. Re:Great! by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      I don't get the joke. What's wrong with "loaned?" Are you thinking it should be "lent?" That's a common error in usage. See, when you actually give somebody something temporarily, the word you should use is "loan." "Loan" is an entirely regular verb; it's past tense is "loaned."

      When you figuratively give somebody something, the word is "lend," and it's past tense is "lent."

      See, you "loan" your laptop, but you "lend" a hand.

    28. Re:Great! by powermung · · Score: 1

      I have a K6-2 450mhz machine running Windows XP flawlessly for about 5 years. Are you seriously using that G4-450 as your main Final Cut Pro machine? Yeah, I can load Adobe Premiere on my K6-2 too, but why load a thousand dollar software on a $50 machine??? I've had a G3-600 that was crawling under OS X 10.0 (though strangely with each point release, the UI became snappier and more responsive) which I found unacceptable for anything other than basic day-to-day business tasks.

    29. Re:Great! by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      Such machines would not be usable as desktops or workstations, IMO, even if they run well enough to do some diagnostic stuff and play MP3s.

      "They run WindowsXP (even with Themes turned on), and benchmark almost 20% faster in applications than they do if we swap hard drives and run Win98 on the poor suckers."

      Hardly surprising as they have the benefit of the NT kernel for I/O and VM.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    30. Re:Great! by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I haven't figured this out, but on my 10.2.x at home doesn't have spell available for Firefox like it does Safari, but it works fine for all other apps including 3rd party apps for LJ clients and various other ones.

      I'd rather use Firefox since it tends to run 10x faster than Safari does, but really miss this feature. Maybe it's only me and I just need to dig deeper or upgrade to Tiger.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    31. Re:Great! by kongjie · · Score: 1

      The 32MB i was referring to is on the mac mini video card. It's nice that it works for you for WoW...I've had other people tell me basically the opposite.

    32. Re:Great! by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      but on my 10.2.x at home doesn't have spell available for Firefox like it does Safari

      I recall there was a plug-in for Firefox and did a quick google, and apparently there's one called Spellbound that does the same thing.

    33. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great tip! Thanks! Awesome, a dream come true.

    34. Re:Great! by Golias · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know what you meant, but the bottleneck is not the 32MB memory card. Blizzard designed the game to work with it.

      The bottleneck is that the base mini configuration comes with 256 MB of RAM installed, and WoW is a memory pig.

      Even with 512 MB installed, you start paging off the hard drive, and the hard-drive on the mini is a high-latency 4200 RPM notebook drive. Every time you start using virtual memory space (which is almost always if you play WoW with less than 768 MB), it's a huge performance hit.

      Tell your friends to try more RAM, and they will discover that the ATI card in the mini actually out-performs the nVidia card in the iMac G5, in spite of having half the video memory.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    35. Re:Great! by kongjie · · Score: 1

      Argh, don't tempt me to go this route...I was just starting to get stuff done now that WoW has been eliminated from my daily schedule.

    36. Re:Great! by Steve+Cowan · · Score: 1
      Hmm, looks like you got me ... sort of. From Dictionary.com:
      Usage Note: The verb loan is well established in American usage and cannot be considered incorrect. The frequent objections to the form by American grammarians may have originated from a provincial deference to British critics, who long ago labeled the usage a typical Americanism. Loan is, however, used to describe only physical transactions, as of money or goods; for figurative transactions, lend is correct: Distance lends enchantment. The allusions lend the work a classical tone.
      I was taught in school that "loan" is a noun while "lend" is the only verb you can use in any case. Mind you, I'm Canadian, and apparently you guys reject the use of "eh" as well (go figger)... :)
    37. Re:Great! by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      You're also using a dictionary as a reference for usage and style. That's an error. You need to find a style book, like the Associated Press one or the University of Chicago one.

  4. Fast! by CypherXero · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yesterday:
    Apple will sometimes seed several final candidate builds before one is declared gold master...'"

    Today:
    Tiger build 8A428 has been deemed the Gold Master for shipping

    Damn that was fast! I can't believe I miss those builds!

    1. Re:Fast! by maxjenius22 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There can be only one.

    2. Re:Fast! by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      First final candidate was 8A420, this is 8A428... assuming that the build is incremented by one, it implies 8 bugfixes....

    3. Re:Fast! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Damn that was fast! I can't believe I miss those builds!

      Of course! It it was slow, they would name it Mac OS X 10.4 Turtle.

    4. Re:Fast! by jlaxson · · Score: 1

      The first FC was 420, the second was 425 (which I'm in the process of downloading for the second time). Builds don't correspond to bugs, but rather, I believe, a rough measure of time.

      --
      On Apple Input Peripherals: They're okay, I guess, but I was really hoping for a one-key keyboard and a 109-button mouse
    5. Re:Fast! by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      My guess is that builds correspond to (think this one through...) builds.

      Each time the entire system is rebuilt (probably automatically at a certain interval), the build number is incremented, and then the QA teams are let loose.

  5. Aprilfools! by binder520 · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would be the best joke on Microsoft if Apple costumed TIGER as Longhorn.

    1. Re:Aprilfools! by mOoZik · · Score: 4, Funny

      It would be funnier if TIGER had a LONGHORN! *wink nudge*

    2. Re:Aprilfools! by dwntwnboi · · Score: 1

      say no more

    3. Re:Aprilfools! by gblues · · Score: 1

      "Of course! Tiger is Longhorn! Longhorn is Tiger! Tiger is Longhorn! Longhorn is Tiger! Tiger is Longhorn! Longhorn is... a MAN!!"

      *cue "Crying Game" theme*

      (with apologies to Jim Carrey)

      Nathan

    4. Re:Aprilfools! by T'hain+Esh+Kelch · · Score: 0

      During the introduction of Tiger to the public, Steve Jobs actually showed a movie to the crowd stating that "this is what we are dealing with" followed by a tiger moving around in the jungle. He then went on to "And this is what the competition is playing around with" showing a big longhorned cow. Hilarious!

  6. April 1st announcement by RustNeverSleeps · · Score: 4, Informative

    An April 1 announcement from Apple actually sort of makes sense, because Apple was incorporated on April 1, 1976. That makes tomorrow Apple's 29th "birthday."

    It's good to see that Apple is delivering Tiger on time. Some might even say it's early.

    1. Re:April 1st announcement by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 4, Funny
      RustNeverSleeps wrote:
      An April 1 announcement from Apple actually sort of makes sense, because Apple was incorporated on April 1, 1976. That makes tomorrow Apple's 29th "birthday."
      This overlooks that slashdot is a geek website. :-)
      Tomorrow will be Apple's 30th birthday (since birthday counting is zero based)
      though it is only the 29th anniversary of Apple's birthday (which is what most people who haven't had to debug overflow and off-by-one errors celebrate.
    2. Re:April 1st announcement by nganju · · Score: 1

      ... tomorrow will be Apple's 30th birthday... ... it is the 29th anniversary of Apple's birthday...

      Your two statements contradict each other. If you say that this is the 29th anniversary of Apple's birthday, you're implying that the only date that can be considered the true "birthday" is April 1, 1976, and that April 1st in every following year does not fit the definition of "birthday", but is only an anniversary. If the birthday is only the actual original date of birth, then tomorrow cannot be Apple's 30th birthday, because Apple can only have ONE birthday. So which definition of "birthday" do you want to use?

      Ok, it's super nitpicking but like you said, this is the geek website :)

      --
      There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    3. Re:April 1st announcement by StikyPad · · Score: 5, Funny

      B.S.

      I was born in '76, and my 30th birthday isn't for another year damnit. Don't steal what little youth I have left.

    4. Re:April 1st announcement by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Actually your 0th birthday would be your birth. Finally something that is already 0-based. although parents don't refer to their children as 0 year olds. they talk about how many weeks/months old they are. So there still is room for improvement

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:April 1st announcement by jacksonj04 · · Score: 2

      It will be the 29th anniversary of Apple's founding, or the beginning of the 30th year of existance.

      Happy?

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    6. Re:April 1st announcement by feloneous+cat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't steal what little youth I have left.

      Trust me, Dude, no one is thinking "man, I wonder if that guy is 18".

      Soon those birthdays zip by like updates to OS X...

      --
      IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
    7. Re:April 1st announcement by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Tomorrow will be Apple's 30th birthday (since birthday counting is zero based)

      Unless you're in China, in which they count the time spent in the womb as a year so you are born one year old.*

      * - More or less, generally in China age is fuzzy. You have a general sense of what it is, but not an exact one.

  7. Cheap updates? by antizeus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there any word about whether they'll offer cheap updates to people who recently bought a Mac? I've heard that they've done so in the past, and I hope that they do again, because I just got my iBook yesterday.

    --
    -- $SIGNATURE
    1. Re:Cheap updates? by superrcat · · Score: 2, Informative

      They only do that for people who make purchases the day of the announcement and after.

    2. Re:Cheap updates? by Finque · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's usually something available.... if memory serves, you only pay $25.
      I could just be talking out of my ass on that value though.

    3. Re:Cheap updates? by superrcat · · Score: 1

      That was for 10.0 to 10.1 because it was feature incomplete and released 5 months later. 10.1 to 10.2 and 10.2 to 10.3 were full price.

    4. Re:Cheap updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      General Apple policy of late has been to offer free (read: pay shipping) updates by mail if you purchased a product it would be bundled with after Apple makes the announcement of the product ship date. So, you bought too early. But if you got one of the rebate deals on iBooks currently available you still got a really good deal.

    5. Re:Cheap updates? by qzulla · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Debian I won't argue with but did MS give you a free update to XP if you were running W2k?

      I didn't think so.

      q

    6. Re:Cheap updates? by Hellad · · Score: 1

      I am not positive about this, but I have heard from numerous posts on other boards that if you bought a machine within the month of the new release you should be able to get a free upgrade. I would highly suggest calling the applecare line because they are usually quite willing to help out with these sorts of issues...

    7. Re:Cheap updates? by Nermal6693 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just to clarify: 2000 was NT 5.0 and XP is 5.1. So 2000 -> XP and Panther -> Tiger are both +0.1 upgrades.

    8. Re:Cheap updates? by man2525 · · Score: 1
      ...because I just got my iBook yesterday.
      Uh oh. Its rumored that the the iBook, eMac, and iMac are getting updated this month. A bump up to a 64MB graphics chip in the iBook would allow it to use Core Video in Tiger (good if you want to work with Motion, for example).
    9. Re:Cheap updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As for the comparison to Debian -- you'll get the equivalent upgrade from Apple for free, if that's all you want.

      (No, there's nothing there yet.)

    10. Re:Cheap updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10.3.1, 10.3.2, 10.3.3, 10.3.4, 10.3.5, 10.3.6, 10.3.7, 10.3.8, and, when Tiger arrives, 10.3.9

      Maybe you don't know what you are talking about.

    11. Re:Cheap updates? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, 10.1 was free for everybody. All you had to do is ask for it. If you had to have it delivered by mail (hello, all those Apple customers in Outer Mongolia) they charged $19 for shipping.

    12. Re:Cheap updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you FOOL! you don't buy a new iBook when Apple has set a deadline for a release of the next OS. YOU JUST DON'T DO IT! but you did and that was foolish.

    13. Re:Cheap updates? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Okay, let's squash a couple of pieces of misinformation.

      One: You're not thinking of Core Video. You're thinking of Core Image.

      Two: Core Image has no requirements at all. Any computer that can run Tiger can run Core Image code.

      Three: Core Image will take advantage of hardware acceleration if it's available. But it's also smart enough not to take advantage of hardware acceleration if the CPU is faster. For instance if you run a Core image application on a 2 x 2.5 GHz G5 with a GeForce 5200 card, nearly all Core Image functions will be executed in the CPU. Because it's faster.

      Four: Motion does not use Core Image. Rather, Core Image is derived from some of the work that was done for Motion, with significant portability enhancements. Whether or not you can run Motion has nothing to do with Core Image.

    14. Re:Cheap updates? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      umm... your dumb... if you buy after the day the product is announced, you get the OS for free (plus shipping and handling)

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    15. Re:Cheap updates? by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      If you call the applecare line be sure you have a credit card number handy. They won't talk to you unless your computer is less than 90 days old or if you purchased a support contract. For all other cases you must purchase support per incident.

      BTW: with panther came out they refused to ship free updates (even for shipping "cost" of 20$) even to customers who purchased after the official announced date. It was the first time they did it but you can expect it to happen this time around as well.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
    16. Re:Cheap updates? by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      mostly true. i got a half hour out of online support from them well after my warranty expired. probably was an error on person on other side.

      i have had both excellent experience with apple and less than recently as they sound like they are reading off the most of same info they have available for public on their website.

      that said, apple, according to consumer reports rates as they best experience for support in industry.

      and how many vendors are there anymore which dont charge for customer support after warranty expires?

    17. Re:Cheap updates? by Hellad · · Score: 1

      It was mentioned that the iBook was a day old so I assumed that it would be under warenty. A side note, the Applecare warrenty costs a bit, but for me was WELL worth it. I had a new dvd-rom drive, new power supply and other repairs that add up to at least 1000 bucks all covered for free because of the warrenty.

      Hmm, as far as your note about Panther, that is contrary to what I heard, but like I said, I didn't have first hand experience with that particular upgrade. Personally I have been waiting for tiger to be released and installed before I pick up my new iMac...

    18. Re:Cheap updates? by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 1

      Comparing the version numbering schemes between Windows and MacOS is down right silly.

      Apple packs more in a "+0.1" release in 18 months then Microsoft does when they have three years and are adding 3 to the number (ie from Windows 95 to 98)

      From Jaguar to Panther saw a completely new UI look for Finder, greatly increased Finder functionality with side bar and greatly increased usability thanks to Expose. Apple had more upgrades and enhancements from 10.2 to 10.3 then Microsoft has done from Windows 95 to Windows XP.

    19. Re:Cheap updates? by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      Comparing the version numbering schemes between Windows and MacOS is down right silly.

      You're quite right. However, some people insist on doing it, and usually do it incorrectly. I'm just trying to point out the facts :)

      Personally I haven't had too much Mac experience, having started at 10.2.4 (and currently have 10.3.8).

    20. Re:Cheap updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets quash abit of misinformation here

      One: Yes, he is actually talking about core video

      Two: Core Video definitely needs requirements

      Three: null and void

      Four: Again, he is talking about core video

    21. Re:Cheap updates? by numark · · Score: 1

      Apple's support techs recently seem to be somewhat lax on checking for warranty information. Sometimes if you call up with a minor question, they'll take it without asking for your AppleCare information. I've done that one or two times (though I have an AppleCare contract, so it's not that big of a deal).

      As for some techs sounding like they're reading off a sheet, that can be true now. However, I've had excellent experience with just moving up the chain of command. Apple techs generally seem more willing to bring someone else into the conversation, like a supervisor, than many other companies. This particularly held true for me during the snafu over the shipment of the delayed GeForce 6800 cards. Oftentimes just by asking once, I'd get someone higher up the chain who could answer my question.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    22. Re:Cheap updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple had more upgrades and enhancements from 10.2 to 10.3 then Microsoft has done from Windows 95 to Windows XP.

      Oh, 10.3's also built on a totally different kernel is it?

      Don't be ridiculous. I'd be surprised if there was much commonality at all between 95 and XP.

      adding 3 to the number (ie from Windows 95 to 98)

      Uh huh. AFAICR, 95 was 4.0 and 98 was 4.1, so that's also a .1 bump. Actually, thinking about it 98 might have been 4.10. But if you think "95" and "98" were the version numbers you're on crack.

      From Jaguar to Panther saw a completely new UI look for Finder, greatly increased Finder functionality with side bar and greatly increased usability thanks to Expose.

      Guess what? Windows XP also has a totally new "find file" dialog with more function. And I've never used it so I don't actually care.

    23. Re:Cheap updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did MS give you a free update to XP if you were running W2k?

      No, but they gave us XP SP2 which is a fairly major update - it's at least as much a feature release as a service pack. Ditto one of the NT service packs - SP3 or SP4, I forget.

    24. Re:Cheap updates? by NoodleSlayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Congratualtions. You just nailed it on the head. XP has functionality that most users never at all use. Apple on the other hand has added features like Expose (next time you're in an Apple Store or Fry's open a bunch of windows and hit F9 on the keyboard, that's expose) and the Side bar on Finder that actually is used on a daily basis by users.

      As for Kernel versions, if I remember right 10.3 is on Darwin 6.0 and 10.2 is on Darwin 5.0. So if you want to pull up obscure version numbers that never get referenced there you go. It was a whole +1.0 more!!! Therefore it must be worth much more then your +0.10 upgrade on windows and just as much as your +1.1 upgrade from 95 to XP!

      However most users don't see the Kernel, you can use the computer without ever knowing what the Kernel is. To most users going from Windows 95 to 98 they would see little to no difference. Going from Windows 95 to XP you'd see some changes in UI colors, some annoying preference changes and sorting on the taskbar. Which is about on par with the changes between Jaguar and Panther (10.2 and 10.3, for those unfamiliar with MacOS)

      So yea, it is worth just about as much as a +1.1 upgrade. Fancy that.

      See what happens when you try to think like a Windows fanatic?

    25. Re:Cheap updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you want to pull up obscure version numbers that never get referenced there you go.

      Hey, you started it :-p

      The Darwin 6 kernel is an evolution of the Darwin 5 kernel. The XP kernel is an evolution of the NT kernel which was written from scratch by a separate team and has nothing to do with whatever's in 95. That was my point.

      I'm not a windows fanatic, I just take exception to lame attempts to bash it (or anything else).

    26. Re:Cheap updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's my impression that Motion does use Core Image and Core Video. I know that those names were not used, and that it wasn't officially released, but they had to get Motion working pre-Tiger.

      After installing Motion I could see that additional frameworks had been added to /System/Library/Frameworks. They may have been developled for Motion, but they are available to everyone.

    27. Re:Cheap updates? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to say that your impression is not correct, in at least two ways. Motion does not include Core Image. The currently-shipping version of Motion can't take advantage of Image Units. (The update to be announced in a few weeks at NAB will.)

      Core Video is nothing but a convenient framework for handling QuickTime movies as OpenGL textures. It's not part of Motion either.

      Both Core Image and Core Video were developed after Motion had already reached the late stages of development.

      Second, the frameworks that are included with Motion, like all other application-specific frameworks, are private. They're not public. There's no published API for using them in your own applications.

    28. Re:Cheap updates? by nine-times · · Score: 1
      Comparing the version numbering schemes between Windows and MacOS is down right silly.

      Right. First of all, because numbering schemes are fairly arbitrary. Apple could call Tiger "OS 11" (or XI?) and it wouldn't change what it was. They could call it "Mac OS 935 XL edition" and it wouldn't be more worth-the-money.

      Still, every time Apple releases a new version of their OS, somebody has to say, "What?! You're paying $130 for a 0.1 release?!"

      Inevitably, someone needs to explain how Apple's version numbering scheme works, that +0.1 releases aren't security patches or service packs. The difference between 10.0 and 10.4 IS NOT like the difference between Windows 2000 and Windows 2000 SP4. If you absolutely had to compare, you'd have to say it's more like the difference between the original Windows NT and Longhorn.

      So, I've posted this explanation many times before, but Apple's numbering scheme goes something like: [code-base].[operating system].[service-pack]

      Until they change kernels and break compatibility, the OS will remain OSX (10.x.x). So if we were to put Windows NT in this scheme, and let's say Windows NT 3.1 was Windows 3.0.0.... Then Windows 2000 would be Windows 3.1.0, Windows XP would be 3.2.0, the most up-to-date version would be 3.2.2, and 3.3.0 would be the version number of Longhorn.

  8. pearpc by Anonymouse+Cownerd · · Score: 4, Funny

    now if only if i had a computer fast enough to make pearpc usable...

    --
    http://www.rayn.net . Funny. Stuff.
    1. Re:pearpc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's okay, you can still use CherryOS!

    2. Re:pearpc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a problem, use CherryOS! I hear it has a tremendous speed improvement over PearPC thanks to the excellent proprietory code created by Maui X developers.

    3. Re:pearpc by Mikito · · Score: 1

      Maybe I could try running Virtual PC on my G4 iMac, and run CherryOS on top of that.

      Then again, maybe that's not such a good idea.

      --
      Anakin Simpson: If you're not with me, then you're my enemy--ooh, donuts!
    4. Re:pearpc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My quad Athlon 64 4000+, with 8gig of ram runs it ace. I bought it just to run PearPC on. Ha, take that apple!

    5. Re:pearpc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      REALLY?!?!?!?!

      You think?

    6. Re:pearpc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just buy a dual G5. PearPC should run fast enough on it.

    7. Re:pearpc by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

      Every gal in Constantinople
      Lives in Istanbul, not Constantinople
      So if you've a date in Constantinople
      She'll be waiting in Istanbul

      --
      Sent from my iPhone
  9. They can't go on like this, can they? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 4, Funny

    So when is Ocelot coming out? And how many big cats are left? Lion, lynx... lynx is overused and probably won't be picked... Any other names?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by superrcat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Garfield.

    2. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Sabertooth. Lion. There are a bunch. At some point you have to drop the cats though. It's better than LONGHORN though.

      Here are some more possible names.

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    3. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by ari_j · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about puma, cougar, mountain lion, panther, catamount, and painted cat?

      (For the link-checking impaired mods: the links are all to the same article, on purpose.)

    4. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by ericdano · · Score: 1
      Actually, here is a better link for cat names.

      right here, from codecomments.com

      --
      It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
      I moderate therefore I rule!
      --
    5. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Garfield.

      That would only be if Microsoft came out with a clone of OS X. It's bloated and requires large quantities of lasagna just to get it started.

    6. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by banuk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Garfield was fat and bloated and moved very slowly... hopefully not the direction apple goes

    7. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by maxjenius22 · · Score: 1

      Liono? Snarf?

    8. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by swimin · · Score: 1

      because puma, cougar, and mountain lion are the same species?

    9. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by superrcat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They're using the codenames to make a better distinction between the upgrades. "Mac OS X" has become a brand like "Pentium" and if they just market it as 10.3 to 10.4, most people would consider it a minor update rather than an entire overhaul.

    10. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by jdwest · · Score: 1

      Puma was the dev reference to 10.1, but not the externally marketed name, e.g. Jaguar (10.2) and Panther (10.3).

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
    11. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by fakedupe · · Score: 1

      Ligers! Ligers! Ligers!

      oh and vote for Pedro!

    12. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Leopard?
      Cheetah?
      Jaguarundi? (I know, too close to Jaguar...)

      And after looking it up:
      Puma (can't believe I forgot this one)
      Serval
      and some others that nobody knows.

    13. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate to point out the obvious...but panther was already used:-)

    14. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by superrcat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fine...Pussy Galore.

    15. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Shhh...you'll ruin the surprise! ;) (Actually, I learned something today - I knew all those names but catamount and painted cat, which Wikipedia lists as other regional names for the same animal. Where I grew up, incidentally, it was just a mountain lion.)

    16. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by ari_j · · Score: 1

      You'd think I'd remember that, since I run Panther on my Powerbook. But maybe I just have trouble with names in general. ;)

    17. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 1

      What about Catwoman? New! Apple OS X, Selina Kyle.

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
    18. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1
      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    19. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Well.. Leopard, Bobcat, Cheetah, Puma, Caracal, Serval, Kodkod, Margay?
      My personal favorite: Flat-headed Cat?
      Um, Sabertooth errr Smilodon?
      Domestic?
      Calico?
      Maine coon?

      Civet? (ok not really a cat)

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    20. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by kevcol · · Score: 4, Funny

      So when is Ocelot coming out?

      How do you titillate an ocelot?

      You oscillate it's tit a lot.

    21. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Google Sets provides some interesting suggestions. Caracal? Serval? Just plain Wildcat (for their last release before XI)?

      Wikipedia says that Apple has trademarked Cougar and Leopard in addition to Lynx. (For reference, they've used Cheetah, Puma, Jaguar, Panther, and now Tiger.) Interestingly, they've mentioned all the members of Panthera except for the lion, so I'd bet that's next.

      And there's always Liger if they're desperate. "It's pretty much my favorite OS...bred for its skills in Unix."

    22. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by the_sidewinder · · Score: 1

      Chupathingy! How 'bout it Grif? I like it. It's got a ring to it. Mac OSX 10.5 code name Chupatingy If this is a major overhaul of the OS, why does it not get to be 11.0?

      --
      /. is not to be used by individuals with high blood pressure or a history of heart attacks
    23. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by ztirffritz · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm holding out for Egyptian Hairless. Once they have mac mini with Egyptian Hairless installed, I'm buying 2!

      --
      Why doesn't anything interesting happen when I have mod points?
    24. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by atezun · · Score: 1

      That's the name of a mexican lizard. You know eats all the goats.

    25. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by ArsonPanda · · Score: 5, Funny

      +5 Funny?
      only time Garfield has *ever* been funny.

      --

      --I don't want the world, I just want your half.
    26. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been saying that the next revision is one-eyed alley cat. I have friends that say the next one is Toonces.

    27. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by fmita · · Score: 1

      Liger. It's pretty much my favorite animal...bred for its skills in magic...

    28. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by zerokey93 · · Score: 1

      Mac OS X Limecat!!!

    29. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kzin.

    30. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by huxrules · · Score: 1

      Max OS X 10.5 "Liger"

      It's probably my favorite OS.
      Bred for its powers in majic.

    31. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by drsmithy · · Score: 1
      Garfield was fat and bloated and moved very slowly... hopefully not the direction apple goes

      Indeed, they should have used Garfield for 10.0.

    32. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... Score: 5? Apparently that's how you titillate a moderator, too!

    33. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      Any other names?

      Feral Tabby.

    34. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this is a major overhaul of the OS, why does it not get to be 11.0?

      I'm sorry, you seem to be outside of the Reality Distortion Field. If you could please step back with in its range, we can continue on as if nothing happened.

    35. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by peter1 · · Score: 0

      Hobbes!!

    36. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by g-doo · · Score: 1

      Puss...in Boots.

    37. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Puddytat

    38. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 4, Informative

      Puma was used too. The names of the releases were Cheetah (marketed as 10.0), Puma (marketed as 10.1), Jaguar (marketed as 10.2), Panther (marketed as 10.3) and Tiger (marketed as 10.4).

    39. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Queer+Boy · · Score: 2, Informative
      And how many big cats are left?

      Apple has registered the trademarks for Lynx, Cougar and Leopard.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    40. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Wait, wasn't Garfield the code name for 10.0?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    41. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by BenWang · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of Final Fantasy X-II...

      Well, OSX-II does have a ring to it, just like Apple-II, Pentium-II

    42. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Puma" was the codename for 10.1

    43. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And how many big cats are left? Lion, lynx... lynx is overused and probably won't be picked... Any other names?

      If only there were some sort of reference source where you could enter a noun and see all of its hyponyms, like for instance all the hyponyms of cat . (A hyponym of a word is a word that describes a more specific type of that thing. For example, truck and car are hyponyms of vehicle, and sedan is a hyponym of car.)

      Anyway, now that I've given away the answers, I want to see Mac OS X "Sabretooth". :-)

    44. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by John+Pliskin · · Score: 1

      http://www.mummra.co.uk/index.php?s=content&p=outt akes

      Made me think of the Outtakes.

      Mac OS X.8 Tits.

      $

    45. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Per+Wigren · · Score: 1

      So when is Ocelot coming out? And how many big cats are left? Lion, lynx... lynx is overused and probably won't be picked... Any other names?

      I'm waiting for Mac OS X Pussy.

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    46. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by KeithIrwin · · Score: 1

      They go through all the existing cats (Ocelot, Lion, Tiger, Lynx, Puma, Leopard, Cheetah, Bobcat, Fishing Cat, House Cat, Liger) and then:

      They move on to the Thundercats.

      Personally, I'm really looking forward to 10.17: Liono. I hear it has some great features. But 10.24: Snarfer, that's really gonna be the shit.

      Then, once they're out of Thundercats, that's when they move on to Thundercats villains.

      I've heard great things about 10.32: Mum-Ra the Everliving.

      Keith

    47. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SabreTooth

    48. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >SabreTooth

      Longfang v longhorn

    49. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      You've got it all wrong:

      Mac OS 10.4 Tiger
      Mac OS 10.5 Lion
      Mac OS 10.6 Bear
      Mac OS 10.7 Oh My!

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    50. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by beowulfcluster · · Score: 3, Funny

      When they release OS X Catbert you know it's time to start looking somewhere else.

    51. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by VirtualWolf · · Score: 1

      Puma's already been used... that was the internal codename for 10.1 (before they started using the codenames for marketing).

    52. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cat Stevens

      This version won't be allowed in the US.

    53. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by stitchypops · · Score: 1

      If you're looking for a few more cats, I kinda like Puma.

    54. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by untouchable · · Score: 1
      --
      As Seen On TV's? Come back!!!
    55. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what in sam hell is a puma?

    56. Re:They can't go on like this, can they? by Thomas+Roberts · · Score: 1
      I hope to God, Apple will NEVER NEVER NEVER use Lion because all the names they have used so far have given me the impression the OS is a predator where each "kill" equals:
      • a user that stops using another OS (switcher)
      • a user that adds OS X to the home so a newer other OS is not purchased (includer). OS X will run new software (new, equivalent, Mac version), and the other OS will run "legacy" software (old, no equivalent, other OS version only)
      There is nothing predatory about the lion's demeanor because the male:
      1. is usually shown laying down and yawning.
      2. looks bored.
      3. rarely hunts (females do the hunting)
      4. it's walking looks more like schlepping
      On the other hand, pumas, jaguars, panthers, and tigers always look like they are stalking prey, and cheetahs can get up to 70 m.p.h. The only other names I can think of that give me a predatory image are:
      • Leopard (10.5)
      • Cougar (10.6)
  10. New Computers by rookworm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When will new computers ship with this preinstalled? I am considering getting a Powerbook soon, so I hope there will not be a long wait.

    --
    The toad can't burp - and for some reason can't fart either, so it swells up and eventually explodes. --Anonymous Coward
    1. Re:New Computers by jdwest · · Score: 1

      Boxes that are ordered post-official announce date of availability will have the new OS installed. That was my first-hand experience on a 2x2.0 G5 tower a year and half ago.

      --

      Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet ...
  11. Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by rokzy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've just been looking at the Tiger preview stuff on Apple's website. it's been there for ages but I never bothered with it until now.

    I knew the features were cool but there were a few extra surprises, like in Dashboard there's a language translator that translates your words as you're typing. it looked really cool - he was typing "French fries" which was dynamically translated frenc->francais->pommes frites as more letters were typed. I didn't notice a USA ("Freedom fries") option in the language list though.

    Automator looked far cooler than I'd imagined too.

    I must say I don't like the new look of the email app though. I love the current skin.

    1. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by superrcat · · Score: 1

      The Mail interface will be the April Fool's joke.

    2. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by keesh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How about "french fries like salt"?

    3. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by m1571k · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      At least they got rid of the dumb mail folders in a tray thing that annoyed so many people :)

    4. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Well, the examples of what you could put on the dashboard certainly looked cool (mind you nothing that I haven't seen in Windows or Linux), but aren't we getting a bit overwhelmed with different types of control panels?

      I mean one on top that we can't get rid of (to make more screen real-estate). One down bottom (that we can at least move around). And now ANOTHER one UNDER that?

      I think I like the paradigm mostly used by KDE and Gnome better. As many toolbars as you want. Put theme where you want. Allow some to pop out of others. And most importantly: allow all of them to hide themselves automatically and allow you to arrange things on them any way you like.

      I know that the "simplicity" of the Apple interfaces is supposed to make things easier by forcing everyone to live within a narrow framework... but they are clearly moving away from that simplicity now. Next thing you know it will be Windows.

    5. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by damiam · · Score: 1

      By "control panel" on top, are you referring to the menu bar? If so, WTF are you doing that you need to hide it?

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    6. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now ANOTHER one UNDER that?

      That one only appears when doing a very specific thing (adding new Dashboard widgets), you can't do anything else when you're doing that anyway, so it doesn't really make a difference.

      It isn't a different "control panel" at all.

      Also, the bar at the top is an essential part of the interface. Why on earth would you ever want to remove it?

      I think I like the paradigm mostly used by KDE and Gnome better.

      It's not so much a paradigm as a failure to make design decisions.

    7. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by MasonMcD · · Score: 5, Funny

      I love the current skin

      Skin? SKIN?!!! OK, you gnome/KDE hippie. Apple doesn't make "skins". They produce "human interface guidelines" and bond the UI onto an app so tight it'll make your anus pucker.

      Unless you're talking about human skin from any "trade dress" lawsuit. In which case, they make lovely lampshades.

    8. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a drawer, they're called mailboxes, and you're called an idiot.

    9. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      like in Dashboard there's a language translator that translates your words as you're typing

      That feature has been available in Sherlock except that Sherlock is dog slow (I have a Dual 2 GHz). It even uses Systran.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    10. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need Dashboard to do that! There's a regular English -> Moron translator here.

    11. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you have to click the button in Sherlock. It doesn't do live translating.

    12. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I liked the old Mail pull out draw better. The new Mail interface looks like everybody elses mail interface.

    13. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      i thought so too, but then i realized, i never put drawer away to begin with. its neat trick to have, but in hindsight i dont think this was it's best implementation.

    14. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh. You wish. Those are skins. It's just lucky Apple still has enough sense to not give you a way to customise them. But then they don't have sense enough to not use metal skin for their web browser. Oh the pain, the pain of it all.

    15. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by yabos · · Score: 1

      Dashboard only comes up when you push F12. Other than that you don't see it.

    16. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by unlinear · · Score: 1

      Sadly, Apple's "skins" are about as tight as, oh, the Comic Book Guy's skin lately.

      Jacked up GUI discisions up the wazoo, and then adjusting the HI guidelines-- that's the New Apple.

      Not that I'm not drooling for 10.4 to come out...but look at the Normal/metal/platinum trio of "skins" in 10.4, shake your head at the Mail.app controls (if they're anything like the MWSF build from last year), and shiver at the inconsistent eyecandy that is only consistent because they changed the rules to match.

    17. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Well, I see that the Apple zealots have totally missed my point. (I should point out that my every-day computer these days is a Powerbook.)

      But why couldn't this new functionality simply been added to the control panel, or made available as a separate all-in-one application.

      Adding something like this as an entirely new design element to me is questionable for a system that prides itself on the simplicity of its interface.

      Now when a new user is not sure where some functionality is they will have FOUR places to look instead of THREE.

      What I see operating here reminds me too much of the release strategy for Windows. You have to have frequent new releases to keep a revenue stream going (rather than just charge users annually for support on their existing OS) and in order to justify a new release you have to CHANGE something, preferably something that is easily noticed. Further, those who don't upgrade have to be punished in some way, in this case by new application that will only work if you have Dashboard.

      Really it was small changes like this, made over many years that has made Windows (and the MS apps that go with it) the monstrosity that it is now, and the same is true of the more bloated Linux interfaces.

    18. Re:Yeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhh!!!!!!! by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Well, there are some of us that are not totally sold on the unified menu bar concept. It doesn't (for example) work with x-windows applications (yet anyway) and there are an increasing number of things that use that tiny bit of real-estate on the right (sound,battery, bluetooth, wireless, date/time indicators) and on smaller screens those drop-down menus on the left and those status indicators on the right run into one another with undesirable results.

      I've run into many situations with applications supposedly written FOR Aqua where the placement of controls on the window vs the hotspots that activate those elements are off by exactly the width of that menu bar.

      To me this indicates that there is some confusion among developers about what it means to take over the entire screen, maximize a window, etc.

      Finally, try running for a while in dual-head mode where you are using two monitors. There is only one menu bar. You have to choose which monitor it will appear on. If you are actively using applications on both screens this results in a lot of mileage on your mouse (depending on the nature of the app of course).

      Maybe the new system will address some of these things, but I have a feeling that the Dashboard concept will make life more complicated without addressing existing issues.

  12. OSX is grrrrrreat! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You know, I am so glad that Tiger is finally being released. I have been using Panther for a while, and it is SO GOOD as far as operating systems go. Yes, I used to enjoy tinkering with all the settings in Linux and FreeBSD over the years, setting up desktop and laptop systems exactly the way I wanted them, but there were always problems and things that I couldn't get working properly. With OSX, everything Just Works (tm), obviously because the same people who make OSX make the hardware it runs on.

    And Tiger is going to be a beautiful release. There are features in it, especially the searching and process automation, that I've been dreaming about for years. The searching technology first appeared in BeOS with its attribute-based filesystem, but the process automation is actually something that a company I worked for ten years ago tried to invent and couldn't get it working properly. When I saw it on Apple's demo page for Tiger, I basically saw exactly the same thing that we tried to do...

    All I'm trying to say is that I thoroughly understand the depth of Apple's success with this software, and the technical achievement they made. This is a UNIX that can do so darn much.

    1. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by blew_fantom · · Score: 0

      With OSX, everything Just Works (tm), obviously because the same people who make OSX make the hardware it runs on.

      And Tiger is going to be a beautiful release.

      All I'm trying to say is that I thoroughly understand the depth of Apple's success with this software, and the technical achievement they made.

      i don't get it... no offense... but is this post suppose to be sarcastic? how could it not work well given development of specific finite hardware and wrapping an OS around that? the beauty of OS's like FreeBSD or *cough* even Windows is that it works well across many different platforms. I just installed FreeBSD 5.3-Release on a 5 year old slapped-together box and *ahem* "it just works". but i didn't spend 3 grand for it.

    2. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by MochaMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Stop surfing slashdot and get back to work, Steve! Aren't you supposed to be writing the press release right now?

    3. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't you supposed to be writing the press release right now?

      I think that was draft #1.

    4. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that you never hear of shortcomings or issues with Apple hardware and software until they release a newer version. Then people come out of the woodwork in great numbers and with such emotion (grrrrreat and similar) on how awesome and long they have waited for feature X and how much better it will be now that feature Y is included and how much faster everything will now run because release current +1 is so much more efficient. Sounds like you are about to shed a tear there but yet had no complaints or issues since the last time you upgraded.

    5. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
      heh... try running Apple hardware and software. Then you'll understand. It's so damn good, especially compared with that Losedows crap, but even compared to perfectly good software like Linux and FreeBSD when used in a desktop or laptop situation, that when some new feature comes out that makes things even better than before... well, these products really spoil you, I'll tell you that.

      And, yes, I definitely shed a tear. :-)

    6. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by eallison · · Score: 1

      Panther runs just fine on 5 year old hardware. My in-laws have an over five year old PowerMac that I have Panther running on, and it works great. They have no complaints at all. Fancy features nicely degrade in a usable fashion (expose drops frames, but still works perfectly well, and that's on a 22" monitor). It's a fantastic upgrade from OS 9, even on old hardware.

    7. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      after version 10.1 i have no complaints, and the usability and speed keeps getting better and better, at times, surpassing my expectations, that why, im not bitching

    8. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it feels better if you paid premium for it.

      then you can let all the little annoyances slide too... or at least not admit that they exist at all since who would say otherwise?

      I got an ibook.. so yes, I have a mac, I'm not talking out of my ass here, it has it's flaws - and it is far from perfect that mac fans make the macs out to be. but it is forbidden to say the bad word about the iProduct.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    9. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by ColMustard · · Score: 1

      Why can't anyone seem to talk about Apple's products without sounding like cheerleaders?

      --
      Moof.
    10. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by idlake · · Score: 1

      With OSX, everything Just Works (tm), obviously because the same people who make OSX make the hardware it runs on.

      Looks like another Apple marketing guy trolling on an open source site.

    11. Re:OSX is grrrrrreat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. So now you have a 5 year old box of crap with an OS thats unusable with any real world commercial apps. Fantastic. Thumbs up man!

  13. A cunning strategm by xenocide2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Announce on April Fool's day, and then just mine the April Fool's posts on slashdot for good ideas!

    --
    I Browse at +4 Flamebait

    Open Source Sysadmin

  14. and it's already a bestseller... by QuantGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...acccording to Amazon. It's the top Amazon software and electronics item, which is pretty amazing considering it's outselling TurboTax and the iPod.

    I ordered mine already, of course...

    1. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by chrism238 · · Score: 1

      Impressive how they can so successfully sell something that doesn't exist - a bit like Mac minis I guess.

    2. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by damiam · · Score: 1

      Just like the next Harry Potter book has been at the top of Amazon's book sales for a while.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by phalse+phace · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No. It's amazing considering Apple only has ~3 percent market share.

    4. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by VooDoo999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slightly off topic, but did anyone else notice Will-Maker Pro at #5? I don't follow sales lists very closely, but this has got to mark some sort of trend. I guess the first review says it all, but with this feature list, how could it not sell?
      # Choose from 40,000 legal documents; protect family and assets
      # Create a legal will, living trust, financial power of attorney, and more
      # Comprehensive and easy to use with step-by-step interviews

    5. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by JQuick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. It's amazing considering Apple only has ~3 percent market share.

      That number is incredibly misleading. It underestimates real users since, lumped into the Microsoft share, are the majority of the Intel PCs used as Point of Sale terminals, ATMs, informatioin kiosks, etc.

      It also fails to account for the fact that Mac owners tend to keep their systems for several years longer than PC users. Thus the percentage of home users of Macs is probably somewhere between %8-%12, not the oft quoted 3%.

    6. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by doon · · Score: 1

      my guess is that it has something to do with the Terry Schiavo case. Living Wills seem to be a pretty hot topic right now.

      --
      To E-mail me, replace the first period in my domain with an @
    7. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by damiam · · Score: 1

      Up until Google removed OS stats from its Zeitgeist last year, Macs were pretty consistently listed at 3% (this is of active web users, not based on sales stats or anything like that). If anything, that's an overestimate, because Mac users are more likely than PC users to use Google (IE by default nudges people towards MSN, whereas Safari has a Google search box built in).

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    8. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by Arivia · · Score: 1

      It can create living wills it seems-a piece of documentation many people are creating as part of the effect of the Terri Schiavo debacle.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    9. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by ErikZ · · Score: 3, Funny

      "It also fails to account for the fact that Mac owners tend to keep their systems for several years longer than PC users."

      I don't see why keeping your old mac in the closet would qualify you as a "user".

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    10. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by gobbo · · Score: 1

      True. It's also true that many mac users spoof their browser, to avoid being shut out of websites that whine about incompatibility.

      Installed user base was up at 55 million at one point in the late 90's... I wonder what it is now. Apple's always had a problem with users who won't upgrade, because the old clunker still works fine... and even though anything over 6 years old is going to be a real slug on the intarwebthing, if it doesn't break down (and yes, there are plenty of OS 8.x and 9.x machines that still don't crash all the time) people will put up with that, especially if they're on dialup.

    11. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, boy, do we even have to talk about how wrong that is?

      Do you know what Google's statistics measure? I'll give you a hint: It's not the demographics of all computer users. And it's not the demographics of all Internet users. Hell, it's not even the demographics of all Google users.

      All those stats measure is the demographics of all Google requests.

      If the number is 3 percent, than that means that exactly 3 percent of all requests to the Google web servers came from browsers that self-identify as being on a Mac. What does this tell us about the entire population of computers out there in use? Zip. Zilcho.

      Example: I know of a business that owns upwards of 200 Macs. They're used for graphics production and video and audio editorial. The vast majority of these Macs will never have hit Google, because they're not used for that. They're used for running Motion and After Effects and Final Cut Pro and Pro Tools and that's all. Two or three shifts a day, six days a week, 52 weeks a year. Their representation in those Google stats you quoted? None at all.

      Don't look to the Google stats for information that the numbers can't give you. You'll just end up being misled.

    12. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is obviously completely anecdotal and this was about 4 years ago, but...

      I worked as a cable modem installer. Every day I got to see computers at 4 or 5 different houses. I worked there for nearly a year. During that time, I saw maybe 4 or 5 Macs. You do the math.

      I love Macs. I use one. My girlfriend uses one. Nobody else I know does.

    13. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It also fails to account for the fact that Mac owners tend to keep their systems for several years longer than PC users."

    14. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by hahn · · Score: 1

      Wow, don't go and rupture an aneurysm. No one said that 3% was an exact figure. It's an estimate. Your argument is that the 3% number is "wrong". Your argument goes on to say that the number is wrong because the requests don't necessarily come from all the Macs being used and you cited an example of 200 Macs at a company that never get used for Internet. Um...SO WHAT?! There are also companies that use PC's that never hookup to the Internet. Your assumption of a bias may be true, but you've given no reason as to why the bias ONLY works in favor of Macs. As long as your example of 'outliers' can also work equally for PC's, the end figure comes out close. As an analogy, if you get a week of unseasonably warm dry weather during winter, it does not mean that your average temperature over a year period is necessarily warmer if you also get a week of colder than usual weather during summer.

      The estimate of 3% is a reasonable one based on a reasonable model. There is no reason to suspect that the probability of usage of Google would correlate with the OS with any significance (if it did, then the numbers WOULD be biased - but you need a plausible reason for why it would). Therefore, with a large enough sample size (and I think it's reasonable to say Google gets a large sample size), there should be very little bias in terms of which OS users use Google. If you presume random sampling - ie lack of inherent bias - (like how clinical trials are done), then your final figure should be fairly close.

      The 3% number may not be exact, but that's not the point. You have absolutely no basis to claim that it is wrong. You have one anecdotal claim and you think that THAT disproves the 3% estimate?

      --
      "The only normal people are the ones you don't know very well."
    15. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Actually there are lots of PCs running windows in similar roles as well (never used for google requests).

      The Google Zeitgeist measure was actually very believable, whether you like it or not. No one has made a good case of outright and systematic bias against Mac/OS and Linux.

      For Linux users its lack of movement was telling everybody who wanted to hear that Linux on the desktop just wasn't happenning.

    16. Re:and it's already a bestseller... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...acccording to Amazon. It's the top Amazon software and electronics item, which is pretty amazing considering it's outselling TurboTax and the iPod.

      According to Netcraft, however, it's dying the same death that the associated architecture faces.

      I ordered mine already, of course...

      The other Mac user was unavailable for comment.

  15. 8A428 slashdotted, mirrors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apples site already slashdotted - somebody please setup mirror for tiger 8A428.

    ;)

  16. Re:I'm preordering as soon as they start selling i by ericdano · · Score: 1

    I'm with you. Every version of OS X is better than the last. I just have to wait for a few programs to be Tiger certified (Digital Performer, Protools).

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  17. Mr. Gates, I love your sig by QuantGuy · · Score: 1

    ...but aren't you supposed to be finishing up Longhorn instead of reading Slashdot? :)

  18. Apple's OS upgrade past performance by amichalo · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the past, when Apple has upgraded their OS versions, they have done the following:
    (1) customers who purchased a new Mac 30 days (the exchange peroid) before the announcement get a free upgrade CD in the mail (or at an Apple Store perhaps?)
    (2) new Macs being built come with the new OS on the hard drive image from the factory.
    (3) computers in inventory get their boxes sliced open and a new OS upgrade CD (DVD?) dropped in. This disk requires the install drive to have an OS on it already, so it is not the same as what comes on the boxed OS CD.

    I have also read other reports from people who got a free iLife upgrade because of (1) having that CD dropped in their Macs as a separate disk, not the OS and iLife on a single disk.

    This may usher in the era of Mac OS missing iTunes/iPhoto/iMovie/iDVD/Garageband on the same CD - thus reinforcing the concept of iLife as an application suite and the OS as a standalone product. Don't look for these new iLife apps on the Tiger install CDs purchased from the store. (But as always, new Macs come with Mac OS and iLife as well as Quicken.)

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:Apple's OS upgrade past performance by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it's 30 days? I'm planning to pick up a powerbook today, but i'm concerned about waiting too long....anyone have a more definite answer?

    2. Re:Apple's OS upgrade past performance by deiol · · Score: 1

      The upgrade isn't free, I got the 10.3 upgrade less than 30 days after I bought my Powerbook and it was $15.

    3. Re:Apple's OS upgrade past performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, ask random dude on /. or the Apple store where you are buying it. Which do you think would yield better results?

    4. Re:Apple's OS upgrade past performance by drdink · · Score: 1

      I believe they classify that money as "shipping charges."

      --
      Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
    5. Re:Apple's OS upgrade past performance by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 1

      I did call the Apple store before posting my question. Their reply was three-fold:

      1) We can't comment on what the size of the time window is, because we don't know.
      2) We can't even comment on past behavior because some would imply that to be a guarantee of how things will be with regard to Tiger.
      3) We can't comment on the announcement date nor the release date for Tiger because we don't know.

    6. Re:Apple's OS upgrade past performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i am super poor; will they offer free upgrade from 10.2 to 10.3 yah think???????

    7. Re:Apple's OS upgrade past performance by base_chakra · · Score: 1

      (2) new Macs being built come with the new OS on the hard drive image from the factory.
      (3) computers in inventory get their boxes sliced open and a new OS upgrade CD (DVD?) dropped in. This disk requires the install drive to have an OS on it already, so it is not the same as what comes on the boxed OS CD.


      Is this to say that Apple doesn't ordinarily include full installation CD-ROMs/DVD-ROMs? I've been wondering if each piece of the bundled OEM software they include is also provided on separate CDs/DVDs...

    8. Re:Apple's OS upgrade past performance by amichalo · · Score: 1

      Let me clarify completely:

      New Macs come with:
      (1) Full OS X CD, able to be installed on a newly formatted drive or reinstall over an existing install.
      (2) iLife
      (3) WorldBook Encyclopedia (non-Power line)
      (4) Quicken (non-Power line)
      The above (1-4) are also on the HD image from the factory
      (5) a recovery CD with recovery tools and a hardware test specific to this model

      What I was saying in the previous post is that:
      (2) new Macs being built come with the new OS on the hard drive image from the factory.
      (3) computers in inventory get their boxes sliced open and a new OS upgrade CD (DVD?) dropped in. This disk requires the install drive to have an OS on it already, so it is not the same as what comes on the boxed OS CD.


      For those new computers that have the old OS image on the HD, because they made it out of the facotry before the OS upgrade, Apple drops in an upgrade CD. The same goes for iLife. When the new version was announced, Apple dropped in upgrade CDs (DVDs some people reported) of iLife '05.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  19. How many bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If it's true that Tiger has gone golden just to meet an April 1st deadline, how many significant bugs do you suppose Apple let slide to meet the deadline?

    1. Re:How many bugs? by citog · · Score: 1

      Why don't you take out a paid ADC subscription and find out? :)

    2. Re:How many bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Why don't you take out a paid ADC subscription and find out? :)

      Oh, does Apple inform its ADC members of the bugs? I think not.

      Interesting that your stupid comment got moderated up, but the original posting was left alone. Could it be that /. is just an advertising arm of Apple?

    3. Re:How many bugs? by citog · · Score: 1

      Oh, does Apple inform its ADC members of the bugs? I think not.

      Interesting that your stupid comment got moderated up, but the original posting was left alone. Could it be that /. is just an advertising arm of Apple?


      Could it be that you're over zealous? The ADC members had access to the various seeds along the way and so see the glaring bugs and a number of the less obvious (from testing in their own development environment). They also have access to certain private mailing lists on which Apple will admit to and inform of bugs (heck even the regular Apple dev lists have this).

      My comment was facetious not stupid, by the way. :)

    4. Re:How many bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In striving for a purely publicity related deadline, I'm so sure the new OS has been thoroughly tested... not! And don't forget the inherent design limitations that Apple knows about and we might call "bugs".

      My comment was facetious not stupid, by the way. :)

      Call it what you like. The fact that you made the suggestion is absurd, dumb, and stupid.

    5. Re:How many bugs? by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      what system or program has ever been released without bugs? some bugs wont and maybe cant be discovered until wider deployment.

      as pragmatic approach, i would imagine you do best you can and fix what you can after that.

    6. Re:How many bugs? by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      deadline might not be based on publicity but i suspect if there are weaknesses they know of they may have been outweighed by getting QT 7 out as soon as possible to coincide with other hardware initiatives. that is the real trojan horse apple has against MS.

    7. Re:How many bugs? by FredFnord · · Score: 1
      Call it what you like. The fact that you made the suggestion is absurd, dumb, and stupid.
      Before I comment on this, just for clarity, let me inform you that I am not the original poster.

      Now, that said, if your posts are any indication, it is my considered opinion that you have had any trace of a sense of humor, or indeed a recognition of sarcasm or irony, completely surgically removed at birth.

      Additionally, from all evidence, it appears you are sorely limited in the vocabulary department, since you do not appear to have the slightest idea what facetious means, nor did you even bother to take the time to look it up.

      In short, it appears that you are dumber than a hat full of assholes and have all the grace and politeness of a rhino with a terminal case of hemorrhoids.

      And now, it is time for bed.

      Cheers!

      -fred

      --
      Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
    8. Re:How many bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask me again after 10.4.1 is out.

    9. Re:How many bugs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the stupidest comment yet.

  20. Re:I'm preordering as soon as they start selling i by phalse+phace · · Score: 2, Informative
    But if they started "selling it," it wouldn't be a preorder anymore...

    Seriously though, if you really want to preorder right now, you can do so through Amazon.com and get a $35 rebate too.

  21. Re:First april fools joke of the year? by Maserati · · Score: 1

    Well, AppleInsider has been pimping this for a while. Nobody else I've seen is citing build numbers unless they're quoting AppleInsider. Apple has messed with people before. I think either AI is getting bogus info from a source at Apple, or AI themselves is pranking.

    But, April 1st is Apple's birthday, so it wouldn't be out of character for them to announce something big. Or prank AI, remember butt-head astronomer ?

    --
    Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  22. Yeah, I can... by SaDan · · Score: 1

    My old 386 is still running Linux. Going on 14 years old.

    1. Re:Yeah, I can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'll bet THAT's useful, Mr Zealot.

      Also, there's no need to add your age to every post.

    2. Re:Yeah, I can... by spir0 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I think his point was that he can run the LATEST Apple OS on his old machine out of the box. Without some serious kernel hacking and years of recompiling, there's no way a modern linux distro will run on your 386.

      Of course, there's no way your power supply or hard disk have lasted 14 years, unless they've been off for over 10.

      --
      The reason girls and Windows users don't understand UNIX is because all the documentation is in Man files.
    3. Re:Yeah, I can... by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      Are you using a GUI on it? I'm just curious because I have an old Toshiba Tecra 740CDT that I've been thinking of installing Linux on. However, the video drivers on Linux only get it up to 256 colours when it actually handles thousands. KDE is too sluggish, and the other less bloated GUIs don't appear properly because they use colours not visible in the 256 colour palette. It's just waiting for a Linux installation.

    4. Re:Yeah, I can... by SaDan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, running XFree86 w/Fluxbox, when I need something graphical on the box.

      It's not the processor that makes the system, but 32Megs of RAM, and the SCSI drives. Anything less than that, and it would be unuseable.

    5. Re:Yeah, I can... by Knightking · · Score: 1

      It's a bit of a strech to call Fluxbox "something graphical". That's why I use bb4win, so I get the crappiness of windows with the bad UI of linux!

  23. Re:I'm preordering as soon as they start selling i by macgyvr64 · · Score: 1

    Good luck with that.. ;-P

  24. OS XI by thundercatslair · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Will apple ever upgarde the name to mac OS 11? I know that apple OS X name is pretty much like microsoft windows, but hasn't there been enough upgrades to warrent the version name upgrade, or a better question would be how is it they even decided to upgrade the version name by 1?

    1. Re:OS XI by amichalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There will never be an OS XI.

      The point of changing the name to OS X wasn't the start a new numbering system, it was marketing.

      Sure X means 'ten' and that comes after OS 9, but it was just a nice coincidence.

      The impact of using Roman numberals signifies a big 'shirft', just like Windows 3.1 -> Windows95 -- "Whoa, something is different with this upgrade!"

      OS X is also important to pay homage to the UNIX core and X-windows interfaces from NeXt that went into the new-from-the-ground-up OS.

      If you didn't get it yet, Jaguar was OS 11, Pnather was OS 12, Tiger is OS 13.

      So yes Virginial, there really is a Santa Clause; but he won't ever put OS XI in your stocking.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    2. Re:OS XI by amichalo · · Score: 1

      Please excuse the parent post. I've been drinking again.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    3. Re:OS XI by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      OS 11? 12? 13? Then why are the version numbers 10.1, 10.2, 10.3?

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    4. Re:OS XI by 1000101 · · Score: 1
      "If you didn't get it yet, Jaguar was OS 11, Pnather was OS 12, Tiger is OS 13. "

      It looks like you are the one who doesn't get it. X is 10. All of the updates since the original have been just that, updates. My guess is that the OS will stay on 10 for a few more years and then get a complete overhaul and bump up to 11. This is just like every other piece of software on the market. Tiger is not 13.

    5. Re:OS XI by damiam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Version numbers are completely arbitrary. The differences between point versions of OSX are at least as significant as the differences bewteen major versions of Classic OSs. So it makes perfect sense to consider them as OSs 11, 12, 13, 14 if you like. No one said there has to be a "complete overhaul" between major version number bumps, as shown by the original Mac OS, which went for twenty years and 9 major version without a complete overhaul.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    6. Re:OS XI by deviator · · Score: 1

      I've been trying to figure out how they will market OS XI when they finally get there - "it's so good, it goes to XI!" might work.

    7. Re:OS XI by fossa · · Score: 1

      You're on 10, all the way up, all the way up... Where can you go from there? Nowhere. What we do, is if we need that extra push over the cliff... Eleven.

    8. Re:OS XI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't get it yet, Jaguar was OS 11, Pnather was OS 12, Tiger is OS 13

      Um, Puma doesn't count? The improvement from Cheetah to Puma was huge!

    9. Re:OS XI by mooniejohnson · · Score: 1

      Blockquoth the poster...

      If you didn't get it yet, Jaguar was OS 11, Pnather was OS 12, Tiger is OS 13.

      Uhh... "About This Mac..." says "Mac OS X Version 10.3.8" It doesn't say "Version 12.0" I'll give you points for trying, but it's not 11.0, 12.0, 13.0, etc. Pay closer attention next time.

      --

      Elmo knows where you live!

    10. Re:OS XI by awtbfb · · Score: 1

      Will apple ever upgarde the name to mac OS 11?

      Yes, but it will really still be 10 but the packaging will make certain people think it is a bit louder.

    11. Re:OS XI by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      Will apple ever upgarde the name to mac OS 11? I know that apple OS X name is pretty much like microsoft windows, but hasn't there been enough upgrades to warrent the version name upgrade

      UNIX systems typically do not change their upgrade numbering very often, even when there is a platform shift (witness IRIX).

      Point releases with point point patches is very common in UNIX.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    12. Re:OS XI by EggyToast · · Score: 1

      I'd love to say it goes to eleven... but they'll probbably just do OS X 2.

    13. Re:OS XI by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Apple uses the very sane X.Y.Z numbering system

      Z is for bugfixes.
      Y is for feature additions.
      X is for backwards compatibility breakage.

      10.3.8 was a bug fix on the 10.3 line.

      10.3.0 was a major set of new features (100+) to the 10.x line.

      10.0 broke(in fundamental ways, excluding Classic environment, etc) compatibility with OS 9. New kernel and all.

      OS X 11.0 (not the X will likely not become XI because it doesn't sound cool) will happen when backwards compatibility is broken or their is something fundamentally big that changes to the OS itself.

      PS: Apple also reserves the right to do whatever the hell they want. But they seem to follow this more or less correctly.

    14. Re:OS XI by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

      Meh, seems to have become synonymous with mac...like Mac OS X 10.x = Windows-whatever... maybe when they make the next paradigmatic jump, like the jump between OS 9 and 10.0 we'll get a XI but you know that XI doesnt look as cool, so we'll probably get some kind of the OS formerly know as X or somehting...
      bah, conjecture, I like the exhausting the big cats theme... force windows to stick with ungulates... I cant wait for Windows Water Buffalo

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
    15. Re:OS XI by idlake · · Score: 1
      OS X is also important to pay homage to the UNIX core and X-windows interfaces from NeXt that went into the new-from-the-ground-up OS

      It's amazing how many things you got wrong in a single sentence:
      • NeXT did not ship an "X-windows" interface. Quite to the contrary, Apple does not want you to use "X-windows", they want you to use Apple's native, proprietary window system derived from NeXT.
      • OS X uses the Mach kernel, not a UNIX kernel. OS X has some BSD UNIX code in it to make it behave like a UNIX system.
      • There is little "new-from-the-ground-up" about OS X; the kernel is largely the Mach kernel, the compiler is largely gcc, the language is Objective-C, and the GUI toolkit is largely NeXT's, all software from the mid-1980's.

      The "X" in "OS X" actually doesn't pay homage to the X Window System. I don't know whether Apple marketing just didn't know better or didn't give a damn, but I consider Apple's use of the name "OS X" rather disrespectful.
    16. Re:OS XI by acb · · Score: 1

      Actually, wasn't there a fairly major rewrite between System 6 and System 7?

    17. Re:OS XI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll just stop making Macs and focus solely on iPods. Duh.

  25. Re:First april fools joke of the year? by drdink · · Score: 1

    If they are, then AppleInsider is in on it too.

    --
    Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
  26. it's a Liger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's pretty much my favorite animal, bred for its magic skills.

  27. Beware this 'Tiger' release! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    **** THE PROOF THAT TIGER IS EVIL ****

    T I G E R
    84 73 71 69 82 - as ASCII values
    3 1 8 6 1 - digits added
    \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/
    3 1 8 6 1 - digits added

    Thus, "TIGER" is 31861.

    Subtract 97 from the number - this is the year Vesuvius erupted, written backwards. It gives 31764.

    Add 0791 to it - this is the year IBM announced S/370, written backwards - you will get 32555.

    Subtract 38, the symbol of slavery. The result will be 32517.

    Add 1983, the year Microsoft introduced Windows 1.0 - the result is 34500.

    Turn the number backwards, and add 1778 - the year Oliver Pollock invented '$', the symbol of exploitation, suffering and injustice. The number is now 2321.

    This, when read backwards, gives 1232. This is 666 in octal, the number of the Beast...

    Evil, QED.

    ( http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/evilfinder/ef.shtml )

    1. Re:Beware this 'Tiger' release! by Espectr0 · · Score: 1


      **** THE PROOF THAT TIGER IS EVIL ****

      T I G E R
      84 73 71 69 82 - as ASCII values
      3 1 8 6 1 - digits added
      \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/
      3 1 8 6 1 - digits added


      LMAO dude you have waaaaaay too much time in your hands!

    2. Re:Beware this 'Tiger' release! by dncsky1530 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or you could just say that their first computer, the Apple 1, sold for $666.66.

    3. Re:Beware this 'Tiger' release! by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Well, I could do the same calculation with "Espectr0"...
      Did you check the link?

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    4. Re:Beware this 'Tiger' release! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Field Commander Moss of the American Freedom Rangers, I presume.

    5. Re:Beware this 'Tiger' release! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just say that Tiger is full of daemons.

    6. Re:Beware this 'Tiger' release! by Aphoric · · Score: 1

      I was too lazy to read all of it, I can't imagine someone spending time to actually come up with this...

      --
      People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
    7. Re:Beware this 'Tiger' release! by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      Nah, that's just Wozniak's weirdness. His phone number used to be 888-8888.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
  28. Automator by jay-be-em · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Automator has to be one of the coolest things I've seen in a gui.. ever.

    http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/automator.html

    It looks like Apple has finally found an elegant way to make a GUI accomplish tasks like these faster than I could at a bash prompt.

    --
    "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
    1. Re:Automator by idlake · · Score: 1
      Automator has to be one of the coolest things I've seen in a gui.. ever.

      Well, I'm sorry you have been so deprived; graphical programming and scripting environments like that have been around for a long time, in endless variations.

      It looks like Apple has finally found an elegant way to make a GUI accomplish tasks like these faster than I could at a bash prompt.

      Faster than:
      wget -nd -r -l 1 -A jpg http://somehost.com/
      zip out.zip *.jpg
      I don't think so.
    2. Re:Automator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this all that different from AppleScript macros which I used as long ago as System 7.5?

    3. Re:Automator by 10Ghz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Difference between Automator and your example is that Automator is something my wife could use. Your example might as well be written in hebrew.

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    4. Re:Automator by skingers6894 · · Score: 1

      Well most people's mothers might be able to do that with automator but the time she would need to understand that script could not be estimated...

    5. Re:Automator by idlake · · Score: 1

      I was responding to the claim that Automator was an efficient replacement for bash programming; it is not. That's why these kinds of environments haven't caught on with experts.

      And while bash may be a little too obscure for your mother, non-experts generally don't have any more trouble learning well-designed scripting languages than graphical environments.

    6. Re:Automator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, I remember Macro Recorder in Windows 3.1 that did the same thing...

    7. Re:Automator by 10Ghz · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I was responding to the claim that Automator was an efficient replacement for bash programming


      For my wife it would be. She would be infinitely more productive with Automator than with Bash-programming ;).

      non-experts generally don't have any more trouble learning well-designed scripting languages than graphical environments.


      I beg to differ. With tools like Automator they would get instant visual cues as to what the system does. The system would just make sense. They just set each step accordingly, by choosing from drop-down boxes (with descripitve names of apps and actions) and the like, and it does the rest. It even has nice arrows point that "when this is done, I will move on to this step here". But let's look at your example:

      wget -nd -r -l 1 -A jpg http://somehost.com/ [somehost.com] zip out.zip *.jpg

      Huh? What is "wget"? What the hell are -nd -r -l 1 -A? How do those tell the user what it's doing? The user would have to spend time going through obscure manuals. With Automator, they could simply tell the system "fetch images from this website, and make an archive out of them".

      Of course, if you have the commands memorized, then typing that command is propably faster than doing the same with Automator. But ask regural user who does NOT have that knowledge to do the same with Bash and with Automator. Which will be faster? Which of them will he rather use? If you answer "Bash", you are deluding yourself.
      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    8. Re:Automator by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

      It is still the difference between a bicycle with training wheels and a motorcycle. Once the complexity of what your trying to do gets to a certain point, clicking on pictures won't be expressive enough. Automator will be a good tool automating desktop tasks. Using it to design init scripts wouldn't be the world's best idea. Incidentally the GUI vs. CLI argument is older than this. If you have the commands down cold, a task like this will be accomplished faster than the time it takes to click all of the pictures and string them together. On the other hand, there aren't that many people who will learn the commands in the first place.

    9. Re:Automator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...which is why it's so cool that on a Mac you can bring up a terminal window and do all the obscure shit you want if that's what floats your boat.

    10. Re:Automator by Speaker+to+Sendmail · · Score: 1

      Oh, absolutely. That will reliably be much faster. Because I've committed to memory all of the options and parameters that I'll ever need to use for wget, curl, grep, tar, sed, awk, bzip, the built-ins from several shells, etc, etc, etc. So I'll just whip off a simple shell script in 15 seconds or so.

      Oh, wait, no I haven't. Guess I'll have to do what every user and most admin's I know do: If the task's significantly complex or going to be performed repeatedly, I'll spend 10 minutes poking through man pages or an O'Reilly book, and another 10 debugging. If it's something simple I'll just just do it by hand and be done.

      One of the most significant advantages of a GUI is that it presents all of your options, even the infrequently used ones, at once -- no memory required. Since automating a task is, by definition, something you only have to do once, it's a perfect choice for GUIfication. I love my *nix shells, my OS/400 CL, I can even tolerate DOS .bat files when I have to, but from what I see here this technology would be at least an order of magnitude more useful to me than any of them.

    11. Re:Automator by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

      I can see the ads for it now:

      Automator, the best scripting environment for middle-aged spammers who like to have a stylish OS!

      --
      When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
    12. Re:Automator by jay-be-em · · Score: 1

      Ok, I concede, probably not faster than a knowledgable bash user, but close enough that I may use it for some things when I don't feel like, for instance, reading the imagemagick man page which I am not very familiar with but is quite useful.

      And yes, I realize there have been similar tools to automater. I simply don't feel they have been as elegant as this solution, judging from the videos and comments I have seen regarding it.

      Perhaps I should have said something more like, 'it looks like Apple has finally found an elegant solution to the problem of allowing people who aren't unix-people to accomplish tasks in an efficient fashion comparable to the way unix-people use small bash scripts.'

      --
      "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
    13. Re:Automator by idlake · · Score: 1

      She would be infinitely more productive with Automator than with Bash-programming ;).

      I wasn't responding to a claim by your wife, I was responding to the claim of an expert bash programmer that it would make him more effective.

      But let's look at your example:

      Again, you are arguing a straw man. I gave an example an expert bash programmer, not your wife, would use.

      Which will be faster? Which of them will he rather use? If you answer "Bash", you are deluding yourself.

      You are just shooting down a straw man. I wasn't arguing that bash is the scripting language for your wife.

      I was simply stating that there are lots of traditional scripting languages novices apparently have no problems with if they need scripting at all, in particular if they are supported by a good scripting IDE. Furthermore, I was simply stating that there have been lots of Automator-like systems before and they don't seem to make programming magically easy.

      What is it with you anyway? Are you deliberately quoting out of context, or are you simply too lazy to understand the posting you are respond to?

  29. In other news.. by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Duke Nukem Forever goes gold!!!

    1. Re:In other news.. by thundercatslair · · Score: 1

      I think it has finally evaporated.

    2. Re:In other news.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Offtopic!?

      You guys suck. I'm sticking to jokes about ducks.

  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who knew Tiger would come out in the first half of 2005?

    Duh! ...come on, even my grandma knew for weeks, that tiger is comming out in april.

    You should use that thing, called the Internet, more often so maybe you would know what's going on in the world.

  32. Erm by OverlordQ · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It's still March 31st in almost all of the USA so where does the April 1st joke come into play?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Erm by 1000101 · · Score: 1

      Normally this would be the time to say RTFA. However, you don't even have to do that to figure this out... RTFP (Read the Fucking Post): "Sources expect an announcement of Tiger's completion sometime tomorrow"

    2. Re:Erm by geniusj · · Score: 1

      Apple hasn't announced anything yet. It is speculated that they will tomorrow, April 1st.

    3. Re:Erm by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      It is April 1st in many other parts of the world though. You know, there are other people on this planet that do not live in the US.

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    4. Re:Erm by seriesrover · · Score: 1
      It is April 1st in many other parts of the world though. You know, there are other people on this planet that do not live in the US.

      yes but why does that matter? Since Apple, a US company is anouncing a product made in the US, from the US, I think the grand parents reasoning is perfectly valid on the point you tried to retort him\her on.

    5. Re:Erm by node+3 · · Score: 1

      It's still March 31st in almost all of the USA so where does the April 1st joke come into play?

      Um, everywhere else?

      And in answer to your next question: Ulysses S. Grant.

  33. Re:Apple... by reiggin · · Score: 1

    Then maybe you should wait a year and a half again before you upgrade.

  34. Re:Apple... by superrcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    You paid $100 for an operating system that is already 2 versions old? I have some copies of Windows Me I'll sell you for $80.

  35. How big is the time window for an OSX replacement? by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 1

    That is, how far ahead is the time window in order to get a free OS replacement from the time of hardware purchase?

  36. Re:Apple... by amichalo · · Score: 1

    Eh!??! What gives? I just paid over A HUNDRED DOLLARS for Jaguar... and now, two weeks later, those sums of beaches are telling me that a new version is out??!!? That's not fair! I'm not paying another over A HUNDRED DOLLARS to get the next version, not two weeks after I got Jaguar!

    Apple... what the heck did I expect? I knew I should have stayed with Win XP.


    I call bullshit. This is an anti-Apple troll.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  37. Fat Freddy's Cat OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Fat Freddy's Cat OS. The more you say it, the better it sounds.

    1. Re:Fat Freddy's Cat OS by Aussie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fat Freddy's Cat OS.

      Ahh, memories. I think I'll find my "Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers" comics tonight.
      Thanks.

    2. Re:Fat Freddy's Cat OS by Carthag · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, I think that was the first time I read a cat comic and laughed.

      "What is this dried shit? I'll go poop in his head-phones."

  38. .torrent anyone? by mattyohe · · Score: 0, Redundant

    JOKE!

    --
    - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    1. Re:.torrent anyone? by momerath2003 · · Score: 1

      From what I can tell, after that SNAFU with the other tiger pre-release, none of the mac torrent sites dare post any apple torrents on it.

      --
      I had but a simple dream, to destroy all humans.
  39. Releasing Tiger means Apple is Doooooooomed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or at least that's what some idiot in the press will say.

  40. Re:Apple by reiggin · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Those that invent and lead the industry tend to make the headlines, as opposed to the followers and imitators.

  41. That may be true by jbellis · · Score: 1

    but from the information on that page there's no way to say.

    1. Re:That may be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he found a way to say it. Of course it is meaningless but the cronies will mod it up.

    2. Re:That may be true by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      and the trolls will undercut his whole point without checking it out to see if it has merit only because it came from apple user, and "thus it just has to be zealotry"(TM)

    3. Re:That may be true by jay-be-em · · Score: 1

      The best part is that I'm a Debian user.

      I just think it's a damn cool idea to have gui tools organized in a way which reminds me of piping and input redirection in a unix shell. I hope GNOME rips this off.

      --
      "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
    4. Re:That may be true by HawkingMattress · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try clicking on the "play here now" link inside the image... (quicktime required)
      It's extremly impressive, really looks like the gui version of Unix pipes. This one might be the last straw for me.

    5. Re:That may be true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just think it's a damn cool idea to have gui tools organized in a way which reminds me of piping and input redirection in a unix shell

      The doublepluscool part is that you can write Automator actions that wrap shell commands, so anything you can do in the shell you can do in Automator.

  42. Another idea... by The+Journalist · · Score: 2, Interesting
    At some point Apple is going to run out of big cats (I am aware this statement is courtesy of Brigadier General Obvious...).

    So for the final release of an OS X variant, you think Apple will say screw it, and decide to call it... OX?

    1. Re:Another idea... by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1

      I was hoping for a "Fluffy Kitten" release, myself.

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  43. Re:Apple... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1

    Dammit... The auction said it was the newest version, new in box, and all that good stuff. I bought it on ebay. As soon as I get home I'm gonna post here the ebay id of the jerk who sold it to me as "new in box"... The asshole didn't say it was two years old.

  44. If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives? by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 1

    It looks like Apple is still stuck in 1.4-land for now but apparently Tiger is going to ship with 1.5. Can anyone confirm this? If so it's going to be a help to those of us with Java 1.5 applications.

  45. Re:Apple by reiggin · · Score: 1

    One more thing... would you rather have a few more stories about Longhorn delays?

  46. troll... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I wonder how much the Longhorn upgrade will cost... I bet it will be more than $100.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:troll... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in the past with MS releases, in the months leading up to the release, the PC makers and MS have offered a free upgrade when it is released, some times months in advance. Apple chooses to keep it a secret to everyone which basically screws the people that bought the day before. Some posts indicate Apple will allow a 30 day buffer if you ask for it.

  47. Re:Apple... by Redshift · · Score: 3, Funny

    Miserable troll. You bought JAGUAR? For a hundred dollars? Where exactly? eBay? If you are not a troll you are just plain dumb.

    Panther is 10.3.

    Jaguar was 10.2.

    Tiger will be 10.4.

  48. waiting for the Big Release by mah! · · Score: 1
    New /. poll:

    most important release of the year?

    1. Re:waiting for the Big Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of them seem important to me.

    2. Re:waiting for the Big Release by uberjon · · Score: 1

      Duke Nukem Fo...Oh wait

      --
      Dick Laurent is dead.
  49. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Those that invent and lead the industry tend to make the headlines, as opposed to the followers and imitators.

    Don't forget the criminals!

  50. One significant upgrade... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 4, Informative

    The machine I'm typing this on had one significant upgrade since I got it in high school. (I finished grad school a few months ago.) That was my 300MHz to 750MHz CPU upgrade. Man, I was livin' large back then, telling myself I'd just get a doubled CPU speed every year and a half. That kinda stopped when I didn't have the spare cash, and hasn't started up since.

    Well, and that 20GB hard drive I splurged on. My root partition is still on the original 2GB, though.

    I'd like to have a few new things, like USB 2.0 (though I could just get a card for that) or Serial ATA so I never have to see a fucking ribbon cable again. I may not play World of Warcraft on it, but it does the same thing it did years ago---runs Opera, runs my little perl programs, and runs gaim. Old gaim.

    Though, because PCs are so modular, you get into a "best axe I ever had, three new handles, five new blades" thing. If you upgrade the RAM, the video card, the CPU and the disks, it's not really the same machine that it was. I doubt I'll buy an entirely new machine in the foreseeable future. So you could consider $2000 in parts spent over six years to be the cost of keeping the machine stocked with quality upgrades. I think it all works out evenly.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:One significant upgrade... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      My 400Mhz B & W G3 cost me about $100 second hand. It runs Panther fine and has enough power to do everything I want to do with it web, mail, music, video and development.

      Since then I bought a shiney white Mac Keyboard for it (post price drop so say $35) and plugged in a PCI USB 2 card (I bought it knowing I was getting a Mac. It was used in my PC for a while before being transfered) at a cost of $20. I also bought myself a nice new IDE Sony DVD burner at a cost of $60.

      $250 for a 'workstation' albiet a little slow, is a bargain.

    2. Re:One significant upgrade... by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      not bad, but your workflow if you are doing music and video would have been worth extra $250 for the mini.

    3. Re:One significant upgrade... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 1

      This was before the mini was announced and you can't get them for love or money around here. The local Apple store is quoting a month or two for delivery. I've always got my Linux PC as a back up.

      Probably six months down the like I'll be getting myself an iBook anyway as my works Dell laptop is huge, heavy and crap. It's more a luggable than a laptop.

    4. Re:One significant upgrade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call BS. I am in grade school now and the computer I had when graduating HS was a p133, they didn't have 300Mhz on 1000 USD machines when I graduated. Not to mention that a MB from 1996-98 didn't support 20GB hard drives. So unless you are in the fast track of grad school or only got a masters I don't see this being reasonable.

    5. Re:One significant upgrade... by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      so how do you like os x in general?

    6. Re:One significant upgrade... by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

      Master's degree in a year and a half. I got sick of being in school, and now I answer the phone all day while reading Slashdot.

      I was really, really confused reading that you're in "grade" school---perhaps a time traveller is replying to me? No, just someone who clearly didn't go to grad school for English...

      --grendel drago

      --
      Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    7. Re:One significant upgrade... by unclethursday · · Score: 1
      I can't speak for the parent you are asking about, but I love OS X. I'm far more productive on it than I am on any of my Windows machines. Ironic that I got my iBook strictly for portability and computing when I am away from home, and I use it almost exclusively at home as well (there are one or two Windows only programs I use, but rarely), and have since the first time I turned it on last March.

      Unfortunately, I've had a string of bad luck with logic boards. I'm having my 4th logic board installed now, and am stuck on a Widnows PC right now, until I get it back on Monday.

      Good news is, with AppleCare, the logic board replacements are free, and will be for 2 more years should I need any more (I hope not). And if I keep having these problems, I'm gonna use my AppleCare to just replace my current iBook with a new one (or see if I can get a PowerBook and pay the difference). I'm willing to let this replacement board go without asking for a replacement because the second board had a physical problem that wasn't detected till it started shorting on me. Depending on what was with this board, I'll see about replacing it under my warranty.

    8. Re:One significant upgrade... by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      wow, four boards. yeah, i think if they cant fix after a while they just give you a new box, or i have read.

      Applecare is pretty good, in that i think they treat you well for the money.

  51. Puma by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    How about puma

    I thought I told you to stop making up words!

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:Puma by G-funk · · Score: 1

      It's not a puma! It's not a puma, at all! /Try the fish, I'll be here all week.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  52. April 1st, Tiger and a 3-button mouse. by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I'm there.

    I'm hoping it is the truly revolutionary pointing device i'm expecting and not just another mouse.

    1. Re:April 1st, Tiger and a 3-button mouse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should announce the zero-button mouse tomorrow :)

      Interestingly enough, a zero-button mouse is perfectly workable in this day and age. All you have to do is tie it to mouse gestures, and voila, Apple can make a zero-button mouse the standard for a new generation :)

      I've been dying to see an Apple mouse parody using this idea for some years now (ever since hearing about mouse gestures) but nobody's ever done one :\

    2. Re:April 1st, Tiger and a 3-button mouse. by cheekyboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How about a mouse with a numeric keypad on it, so you can type txt using mobile phone combos, 5-2-6

      Would be good for a few things, numeric entries that you cant be bothered to type with, or Enter keys etc...

      Just in case any one patents this, ive posted it first, so NYA NYA NYA its mine, pay up. Oh and it was obvious, as in "drink some beer, oh I have an idea"

      All great inventions are products of chaos/randomness

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  53. Re:Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    And if I have to upgrade again, how am I ever going to finish copying my 17M file?

  54. Re:If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives by Redshift · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, Apple's Tiger 10.4 will contain Sun's Tiger 1.5.

    http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=523

  55. Congratulations! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Hey, I think you're the first!

    Yes, complaining about how good the April Fool's Slashdot posts were back in the day has become even more of a Slashdot tradition than the silly fake news itself.

    So, you win "First Crotchety Old Post". Go you!

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  56. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think my last post was flamebait? You should have seen it before it was revised!

  57. Re:First april fools joke of the year? by tdelaney · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you ought to visit outside of the US ... it's been April 1 here for the last 14 hours.

  58. JDK 1.5 by akuzi · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if JDK 1.5 will be shipped with Tiger, and if so will it be the the default JVM?

    This is one of the few pieces of software I run on Linux development box that is currently not available for OS X (not counting developer seeds).

    1. Re:JDK 1.5 by Redshift · · Score: 2, Informative
  59. Re:Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Troll, apple do release free patches for sercurty & stabity updates.
    But thanks for playing, please now stop molesting the goats.

  60. Why XI? by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    What makes you think there's going to be an OS XI? Perhaps it'll be like the X11R7, or TeX 3.2, or Linux 3.0... well, damn it, I'm sure there's a lot of software that stops making major version number changes.

    Kinda like Intel had their 'Pentium' name that they kept milking through what, four significant processor generations?

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Why XI? by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OS XI - 30th anniversary, fully 64 bit, tuned IPv6, new filesystem, complete reworking of emulation of OS9 technologies, completely rewritten kernel, GCC 5.0, new developer tools/GUI builder, The Son of Dock... it's going to be a very different animal (pun intended)... think somewhere along the lines of the jump from System 7.0 to 8.5 in terms of functionality and revision.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:Why XI? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      And a fully vector-based UI, I hope.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Why XI? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      mmm... speaking of TeX... when is Prof K. expected to release the big 4.0? I have been waiting for nearly 15 years already!!!!

      umm.. no, please to not respond, it was a joke.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Why XI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, in case this is not a joke, TeX's version number is asymptotically approaching pie. Yum, pie! The big K might be a chef on his spare time.

    5. Re:Why XI? by Kethinov · · Score: 1
      it's going to be a very different animal
      Mac OS XI: Chimera
      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    6. Re:Why XI? by hawk · · Score: 1

      >Kinda like Intel had their 'Pentium'

      Intel had no choice.

      Safe computing *requires* thata you draw a pentium around your computer before launching Windows (or any other form of trafficing with demons, for that matter).

      hawk

    7. Re:Why XI? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im sorry... what is the PC term for illiterate moron?

  61. Holy Diver.... by bushlick_bill · · Score: 1

    you've been lost too long in the midnight sea oh what's becoming of me... ride the tiger you can see his stripes but you know he's mean oh can't you see what I mean? -ronnie james dio

    --
    I liked it better when nerds weren't cool.
  62. What about 10.3.9? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    10.3.9 after 10.4?

    1. Re:What about 10.3.9? by mfivis · · Score: 1

      The only issue is marketing -- may confuse some people -- not that the 10.3.9 release is played up in any way.

      Is there something in 10.3.9 you desire more than Tiger?

  63. Tiger by Alien+Venom · · Score: 3, Funny

    TIIIIIIIIIGER UPERCUT?

    1. Re:Tiger by RikF · · Score: 1

      lol - obviously not a lot of other SFII players reading this morning!

      --
      In Soviet Russia you own your cat
  64. Re:First april fools joke of the year? by Petrushka · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you ought to visit outside of the US ... it's been April 1 here for the last 14 hours.

    ... 16 hours here. Not too long until April Fool's Day is over!

  65. Half-Life 2 (even though it came out last year) by bushlick_bill · · Score: 1

    It's THE killer app... CounterStrike?

    --
    I liked it better when nerds weren't cool.
  66. Re:I'm preordering as soon as they start selling i by Rainbird98 · · Score: 1

    Actually you can pre-order Tiger right now through Amazon.com for $94.99 with their mail-in rebate.

  67. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by dirkstoop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Au contraire,

    The number one question asked by 'the archetypical mini-buyer' - and of course the tons of other people that ask for a mini who sometimes have some similarity with this mythical person - is 'Will I get Tiger for free when I but my mini now?'

    The archetypical mac-mini switcher (subset of a-mm-buyer) is not the complete computer-n00b we would all love to go out and buy a mac, only because then we might actually get to benchmarks the actual stand-by time of our mobile phones, that type of user still uses the windows pc they've had for years because they don't care about computers, don't read the articles about them in the press, skip conversations about computers in social events because they're biased to think they won't understand any of it anyway and are thereby still highly unaware of the other options out there besides using their windows 95 OSR 2 box with 16 megs of ram till death.

    The typical switcher we get - I work in a big Apple Centre in the Netherlands - is the slightly geeky guy on a budget. The type that cares a bit above average about computers, never used Linux because they couldn't figure out how to install it in the amount of time they wanted to commit themselves to it and besides that just mature enough to be tempted by the idea that *it* might JustWork(TM)

    -- above passage not intended as linux-is-too-difficult-for-'normal'-people-flame-b ait but merely to describe the type of user whe're talking about here--

    The second most important typical mini-buyer is the user that already has -at least one- mac, looking for an extra machine to fulfill some specific task(s) , or unable to resist the mac mini coolness factor and getting one while not having the faintest clue why they would need it, or to replace for instance a dying iMac they've been using as a file- and print-server on a budget or likewise

    Besides that, all the linux-geeks I know either want one, already have one or don't need one since they've gotten themselves an iBook. but that's not such a large part of the people we get in our store.

    All of those categories of customers actually care *a lot* about whether or not Tiger will be included with their minimac.

    PS: I'm not in sales but in tech support, so I might miss a few of those potential customers..

    --
    (may read 'IMHO' wherever omitted from above text)
  68. Am i rite guys? by arron_nz · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is an april fools joke, isn't it?

    --
    garble
  69. What version of GCC? by Zetta+Matrix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I remember correctly, Apple intended to ship GCC 4.0 with Tiger. Currently the 4.0.0 branch of GCC is in phase 3 (the final phase before release). Is Tiger going to have a custom GCC build with some of the 4.0 features (some recent snapshot of the 4.0 branch) like SSA and auto-vectorization, or have they fallen back to the 3.4.x series?

    1. Re:What version of GCC? by Raleel · · Score: 1

      there is precident for them shipping an alpha or beta... they were using betas of samba 3, then patched it up

      --
      -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
    2. Re:What version of GCC? by bonch · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/xcode.html

      "At the heart of Xcode 2.0 is Apple's version of gcc 4.0, the next generation of the industry-standard gcc compiler. The new compiler helps you get more performance from your existing code by using a number of advanced optimization techniques. Auto-vectorization, a technique borrowed from the world of supercomputing, helps you to unlock the power of the Velocity Engine in every PowerPC G4 and G5 system without writing vectorized code. Other optimization tools include support for feedback-directed optimization and inter-module analysis."

    3. Re:What version of GCC? by jimmyharris · · Score: 4, Informative

      The pre-release builds are including both gcc 3.3 and gcc 4.0 with 4.0 being the default.

      You can switch between them using the

      /usr/sbin/gcc_select
      command.
    4. Re:What version of GCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was modbombed by pro-MS trolls with a grudge. Karma went from excellent to terrible in one day. Thanks, mod system!"

      Maybe you were modbombed by people who just got tired of your postings. A lot of them look like trolls to me.

    5. Re:What version of GCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And well before that it was "I'm being modbombed by anti-MS trolls!"

      Nothing has changed here. bonch is still a liar, a hypocrite, a karma whore and a troll.

    6. Re:What version of GCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like someone's mod points ran out, so they're resorting to AC stalker posts again. I see metamoderation is already reversing bonch's troll mods. haha!

    7. Re:What version of GCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm not mistaken Bonch wasn't even modbombed For anything regarding Microsoft. He was modded down because he thinks every pirate defends the GPL (not that I see any relation whatsoever).

    8. Re:What version of GCC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I.e., you're the mod who did it.

      For the record, i read Bonch's posts and there's nothing saying every pirate defends the GPL. it looks like he was saying they're both intellectual prop. violations...and they are...

  70. New Poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll get a Mac when:

    - It Ships With Tiger.
    - It Ships With 10.n+1.
    - I can afford one.
    - I get tired of being a WinZombie.
    - It Runs Windows.
    - Command Taco Does.
    - I have a Mac, you insensitive clod.

  71. Choosing a date for a product announcement by vandelais · · Score: 0

    2 Things you don't let your marketing dept do if you can help it if you are a Fortune 500 company.

    1) Guarantee your product intro will not be even the lead financial story of the day by introducing it the day the Dept of Labor releases monthly non-farm payrolls.

    2) Introducing a product on April Fools day, a national holiday or 9/11.

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
    1. Re:Choosing a date for a product announcement by mosschops · · Score: 1

      2) Introducing a product on April Fools day, a national holiday or 9/11.

      Why not? It all adds to the is-it-or-isn't-it buzz. Gmail being announced 1 year ago today didn't seem to do them any harm at the time :-)

  72. nice grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apple do release free patches for sercurty & stabity updates

    1. Re:nice grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with the grammar? I see spelling errors, but no other errors.

    2. Re:nice grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try and find it yourself.

  73. Re:zero based birthdays by santakrooz · · Score: 1

    not a worldwide standard. china is 1 based for example.

  74. pardon my french, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you Sir are reading slashdot?

    Then again. Nice troll...

    Smartass
    Dumb Troll. /me thinks you have too much Karma.

  75. Nope... JDK 1.6!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OS X Tiger will be the first OS to support JDK 1.6, which by the way will support .NET pcode natively. yet another reason to go with OS X!!!!

    1. Re:Nope... JDK 1.6!!! by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Oh, well trolled sir!

      I like it - short, full of technical sounding gibberish but with just enough "OSX R0xors LOL!!11!1" thrown in at the end to thoroughly hook the Apple zealots. Informative indeed!

  76. PIII @ 900, 6 years old, runs XP just fine... by wernst · · Score: 2, Informative
    So the previous mac-head said, "can you say that you can use a 6-year old PC without any siginificant upgrades and still run the latest OS and software and be productive with it?"

    Sigh.

    I'm currently typing this on a Pentium III @ 900 with 512 megs of ram and a 60 gig hard drive which is, hey, what do you know, SIX years old. Though I'm running Ubuntu at this instant, I was happily running Windows XP all day to run FrameMaker and Lotus Notes (along with Opera and Firefox) perfecly fine.

    Look, I'm very fond of my Mac (and even older Blue and White G3), making silly statements isn't going to win any converts...

    1. Re:PIII @ 900, 6 years old, runs XP just fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't even remember a p3 existing with that clock speed in 99. Even if it was around, it was probably about 7-800 dollars just for the processor. 60 gigs definately wasn't cheap at that point either. I paid 200 dollars or so for a 30 gig in 2000, so figure on 500 or so for a 60 gig back in 99 to be generous. 128mb sticks were about $100.00 at that point, but since most motherboards came with 3 DIMM slots you probably have 2 256mb sticks in there which would have been even more expensive. So, with those specs, you've either upgraded or you spent a shitload of money on that machine when you first got it. More than the average Mac of the same era would have cost.

      This combined with the fact that most people buy PC's for as cheap as possible basically nullifies your arguement. In most circumstances, a Mac is going to last a lot longer.

    2. Re:PIII @ 900, 6 years old, runs XP just fine... by fr0dicus · · Score: 1

      That's five years old at best, even if you bought that chip on day of release.

  77. mmh... Automated pr0n.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://images.apple.com/macosx/tiger/images/automa torretouch_20050113.jpg

    well, except for that kid and that retouch thing...

  78. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by rnelsonee · · Score: 3, Informative
    I just want to say that I agree with you - a lot of Mini buyers do know what Tiger is, and knew it was coming out soon. I should know, becase I'm one of them. And you hit it on the head "slightly geeky guy on a budget". For me, I'm a bit more than 'slightly' geeky, but at the same time, I wasn't really in the market for a new computer, I just got the Mini cause I always wanted to try OS X.

    I'm basing some of this off of the fact I have seen zero Mac Mini commercials - most Mini buyers (in the eastern US anyway) probably heard about it by word of mouth (and internet) rather than a traditional media campaign - so they know at least a thing or two about OS X and what the releases mean.

  79. Re:Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT dog. Jaguar is already a version behind.

  80. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  81. Re:When will by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1

    Probably tomorrow.

    --

    -
    Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
  82. Wacom 21UX Cintiq with "tilt" support. by JackAxe · · Score: 0

    It's what I like and what I've wanted for a very long time.

  83. feature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pardon my ignorance Sir but it works as advertized... you grep foo on zero, so of course I'd expect that to go for ever... and slow down the system... I think your linux needs a fix for that out of memory error.... or you need more memory.

    ui... do not try this at home...

  84. Build numbers by warkda+rrior · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... Tiger build 8A428...

    Think about this: if the build number is in hex (i.e. 0x8A428), this is the 566,312nd build of Tiger.

    Now, about 18 months passed since the release of OSX 10.3. This means that Apple built OSX Tiger about 42 times per hour, without stop since Oct. 2003 (OSX 10.3 release time)!

    --
    You need to install an RTFM interface.
    1. Re:Build numbers by godawful · · Score: 1

      yeh, except no.
      os 10.3 was 7(letter)nn. for example, 10.3.8 is 7U16.
      the first number goes up one for every major os release (as i recall, i dont have older versions of the OS around to check).
      the letter changes with every 10.2(3, 4).x release.. the last two digits (or 3) are more in accordance to the build.

      i know im not making the most sense with this, but i just woke up

      --
      Live EVERY week... Like it's Shark Week
    2. Re:Build numbers by pdawgplaya · · Score: 1

      nice thought, but no you'rewrong. 8 is the version number. 10.4 is just used externally. version 1 was an internal built, version 2 was public beta, version 3 was called 10.0, version 4 was 10.1 and so forth... the A means that this is version 10.4... 10.4.1 will be 8B something, this release would be the 428th build of it.

    3. Re:Build numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The build numbers don't work that way. Here's a little table with some examples:

      MacOS X version Darwin kernel version Build
      10.2.0 6.0.0 6Annn
      10.2.1 6.1.0
      10.3.0 7.0.0 7Annn
      10.3.8 7.8.0 7U16 (what I'm running right now)
      10.4.0 8.0.0 8A428

      The first digit of the build number is always equal to the Darwin kernel's major version number. The next position is a single alpha character which Apple uses to distinguish different lines of development on that major revision of the OS. The first release will always be an 'A'. If the first branch they make is to add drivers for a new computer, that build series will get 'B', the next branch gets 'C' and so forth. The two major kinds of branch that I know about are for updates (10.3.0 -> 10.3.1 etc.) and for new hardware support.

      Finally you get to the actual build number, which is simply a boring old decimal number.

      So 8A428 actually means it's the first (and probably currently only) branch of 10.4 with 8.x.x series Darwin kernels, and it's at its 428th build.

  85. Re:When will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Microsoft releases Windows for PowerPC.

  86. Re:Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit meaning that scenario could not happen? How exactly how could it not happen? You mean Apple has sold no hardware in the last two weeks so there is not a single person this would happen too? Were they preloading Tiger two weeks ago? Could you explain?

    As much as I do not believe that actual specific poster myself, it deos happen. I remember the major PC vendors offering free upgrades from ME/2k to XP on new computers months before XP was released. It was no secret. Apple actively decides to hide or attempt to keep their updates a secret and there are people who get screwed for that exact reason. Is that a better way to treat a customer? Keep them in the dark so they might be fooled into buying something older? You can deny it or try to make excuses for it but bottom line, people are getting the shaft. Heck, Longhorn was announced well over a year ago (of course it keeps getting delayed but that is a different point).

  87. Yes, they can: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SABERTOOTH!!!!!!!!

  88. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by ColMustard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm, I haven't seen any mini ads either, and I've only seen one or two iPod ads. Maybe I just don't watch the right shows/read the right magazines...

    I have been pleasured to notice a sharp decline in Dell ads that have reached me, though. If that 'dude' guy or those dorky interns say one more think about Dell's superior service...

    --
    Moof.
  89. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by grotgrot · · Score: 1
    The number one question asked by 'the archetypical mini-buyer' - and of course the tons of other people that ask for a mini who sometimes have some similarity with this mythical person - is 'Will I get Tiger for free when I but my mini now?'

    That is exactly what I asked on the day they came out when I bought mine. The Apple person on the phone said Tiger would be free or $20.

  90. Another dissertation of evil-ness by totoanihilation · · Score: 1

    In the same train of thought, here's more proof that Apple is evil ;)

  91. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A release posted to slashdot does not equal media coverage. Take a random poll on the street of who knows or heard about XP SP2 (just the SP, not even the entire OS) compared to who has heard of Tiger. I can even make it simpler for you. Ask 30 random people to name a single OS for an Apple computer and then ask them to name an OS for a PC.

    Then rethink your headline and media coverage comment. It has NOTHING to do with someones opinion of invention and industry lead.

    My comment is by no means an attempt to bash Apple or any company at all, just your silly comment.

  92. Re:Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple hipsters like these guys?

  93. Re:If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just so you know, the reason Apple doesn't invest very much time or effort into Java is because there's zero demand for Java client applications on the Mac. And the reason there's zero demand for it is because Java applications that are ported to the Mac have so far been done very sloppily, resulting in a bad user experience all around.

    If you want Java support for the Mac, do two things. First, sign up with ADC and express your opinion. Second, start writing good Java applications for the Mac.

  94. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that someone can dredge up a years-old script that works with any word, put TIGER into it, copy and paste the results and get a +5 funny?

  95. 10.4 Went Gold! by espek · · Score: 3, Funny
    Seems snappier!

    Updated permissions, everything seems ok.

  96. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by jargoone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The typical switcher we get - I work in a big Apple Centre in the Netherlands - is the slightly geeky guy on a budget. The type that cares a bit above average about computers, never used Linux because they couldn't figure out how to install it in the amount of time they wanted to commit themselves to it and besides that just mature enough to be tempted by the idea that *it* might JustWork(TM)

    You have a good view, but let me give you a data point. I'm a Linux sysadmin by day. My "server" at home runs Linux. My desktops at home run sort of Windows by necessity: one is for my wife, the other is my laptop that I need to use with a Centrino wireless card, and VPN for work. I know that I could "train" my wife to use Linux. I also know that I could get my finicky laptop to work. Point is, I don't want to. By the time I get home, I don't feel like it.

    From reading (mostly on /.), I'm about to switch. I want a machine that will allow my wife and I to use with sessions running simultaneously. I want mail and printing and scanning to work right. I want Bluetooth syncing to our phones and my wife's Tungsten to work. I want to be able to use my iPod, and my digital camera, and edit videos. I want it to all be integrated, and I want it to, yes, "just work".

    I mess around with things enough at work and home. When I want to play, I have plenty of things to play with. But I want something that I don't have to think about unless I want to. I don't want to have to edit a single god damn configuration file to accomplish the above tasks. Is the Mac the right answer? I think it might be. But if it's not, that's okay. I can go back to the old way, and when I do, I'll sell the Mac for damn near what I paid for it.

    I never thought I would be this way. But I've reached a time in my life where I have less patience and willingness to sacrifice free time. I also have lots more money. That's why I'm giving it a shot.

  97. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The typical switcher we get - I work in a big Apple Centre in the Netherlands - is the slightly geeky guy on a budget. The type that cares a bit above average about computers, never used Linux because they couldn't figure out how to install it in the amount of time they wanted to commit themselves to it and besides that just mature enough to be tempted by the idea that *it* might JustWork(TM)

    sorry, you are wrong here! i *have* used linux (red hat, then mandrake, then suse, then debian) and stopped when I found OS X! I am stuck at home with win XP, because I just want word and thunderbird and firefox to work here anyways, but use OS X at the lab and am just waiting for an imac and os upgrade to get one for home.

  98. So what's the answer? by commodoresloat · · Score: 0

    I ordered a mini about 2 weeks ago, scheduled to arrive 3 weeks after I purchased it (i.e. next week of course). The big question is, will I have to pay for tiger? I'm guessing (hoping!) not.

    1. Re:So what's the answer? by robbieduncan · · Score: 1

      If it was ordered before a shipping date for Tiger was announced then you will have to pay for Tiger. Apple tend to offer people who buy machines once a shipping date is announced "free" upgrades (you pay shipping, normally around £15,$20). As your machine looks like it's going to ship after a Tiger ship date is announced you might get lucky.

  99. Easier way of acheiving the same result by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. Tiger build 8A428... Think about this: if the build number is in hex (i.e. 0x8A428), this is the 566,312nd build of Tiger. Now, about 18 months passed since the release of OSX 10.3. This means that Apple built OSX Tiger about 42 times per hour, without stop since Oct. 2003 (OSX 10.3 release time)!

    8A428

  100. NeXT was never based on X11 by mamladm · · Score: 1

    You're mistaken. NeXT always had it's own windowing system which was based on Display Postscript (DPS). It was NOT based on the X Window System.

    from Wikipedia ...

    "The developers of NeXT wrote a completely new windowing engine to take full advantage of NeXT's object oriented operating system. A number of commands were added to DPS to actually create the windows and to react to events, similar to but simpler than NeWS..."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_PostScript

    --
    the macintosh asterisk mailing list http://www.astm
  101. Re:How big is the time window for an OSX replaceme by earthtoandy · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you purchased a computer within 14 days of the anouncement of release you are entitled to a $20 upgrade. This is how Apple has done it in the past.As far as buying Panther on its own there is no upgrade.

  102. Did someone say tiger? by kiddailey · · Score: 0, Redundant
  103. Re:Apple... by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 1

    "...And I said, I don't care if they update again either, because I told, I told Jobs that if they update one more time, then, then I'm, I'm quitting, I'm going to quit. And, and I told Ballmer too, because they've updated my SP two times already this year, and I used to be over by the window, and I could see the squirrels, and they were married, but then, they switched from the Jaguar to the Panther release, but I bought my Jaguar release because it didn't bind up as much, and I kept the disc for the Jaguar release and it's not okay because if they update to 10.4 Tiger then I'll set the building on fire..."

    (With apologies to the fine people who wrote, produced and directed Office Space)

    --
    Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
  104. script? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    Can someone else dredge up this script and post the link? There are many other things I would like to prove are evil, but I don't want to do that much work.

    1. Re:script? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy linked to it at the end of his post.

  105. Re:First april fools joke of the year? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In addition to AppleInsider's reports, there have been developers on several different Mac discussion forums talking about these builds, and the things they say always line up with what AppleInsider is saying. I have to believe that AppleInsider is getting their information from developer's who actually have the seeds. Granted, I haven't heard anything about this very latest (gold master) build, but there was plenty of talk about the previous one (final candidate). I'm sure there are developers talking about this latest one too, it's just that I haven't been on any of the Mac forums since this news broke.

  106. Oh I don't know by mcc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have you ever seen what happens when you put a tiger and a longhorn steer in the same room?

    Now THAT'S funny

  107. Mac OS Y? by silence535 · · Score: 1

    Mac OS why?

    -jsl

    --
    Dyslectics of the world, untie!
  108. Re:Apple by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    if you have been here for 5 years and thought that they have slipped just recently, then I think you need to pay more attention.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  109. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "or unable to resist the mac mini coolness factor and getting one while not having the faintest clue why they would need it" This probably describes 99% of purchases ever made. :)

  110. Re:If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives by arodland · · Score: 1

    Why does your software have a handedness? Doesn't that make it incompatible with half of the potential computers in the universe? And what's the chirality of my laptop anyway?

  111. Re:If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Just so you know, the reason Apple doesn't invest
    > very much time or effort into Java is because
    > there's zero demand for Java client applications
    > on the Mac. And the reason there's zero demand
    > for it is because Java applications that are
    > ported to the Mac have so far been done very
    > sloppily, resulting in a bad user experience all
    > around.

    You obviously have no clue - for a start you don't have to 'port' Java applications to OS X - they run as is, also your post has absolutely nothing to do with the post you are replying to - the parent doesn't mention anything about how much effort Apple puts into java.

    IMO Apple has put an admirable amount of effort in Java and has really taken a gamble with making a first-class citizen on OS X. They've licensed Sun's JVM and made most of the Cocoa APIs available to Java apps. They also ship JBoss with OS X Server - a competing product to Web Objects - their enterprise application solution, which they've also port to Java. I'd say they're pretty committed.

  112. Most important "new feature" by webhat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Those are all great, but to me, I want to know if Tiger has another "new feature": Does it make my computer feel faster?

    Pretty much every previous release of MacOS X has brought speed improvements, and I want to know if Tiger will continue that tradition. Not all of us can afford G5s at the moment, and a speed increase would really make it shelling out another 80 bucks or so (.edu discount) worth it.

    --
    'I am become Shiva, destroyer of worlds'
    1. Re:Most important "new feature" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A new operating system that is faster than the previous version? That's impossible. Like, Darth Vader is Luke Sykwalker's father kind of impossible.

    2. Re:Most important "new feature" by Slashcrap · · Score: 1

      Those are all great, but to me, I want to know if Tiger has another "new feature": Does it make my computer feel faster?

      Absolutely! Tiger will be around 50% faster for most tasks than 10.3.

      Please note that this isn't because 10.3 was slow and inefficient and there were lots of easy improvements to be made. No, it's because....ummm, errr.. Look over there - Free IPods!!

  113. Re:If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives by MassacrE · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You obviously have no clue - for a start you don't have to 'port' Java applications to OS X - they run as is, also your post has absolutely nothing to do with the post you are replying to - the parent doesn't mention anything about how much effort Apple puts into java.

    It is developers who think that Java applications run as-is who are responsible for the shitty java applications on OS X today.

    It takes a handful of lines to switch to the mac menu bar (instead of window-mounted menus), but nobody does it. Java apps which 'run' on the mac are often not even tested to see how they behave.

    I would never advertise my mac client software as 'java software', because users now consider that a badge of warning. If it is a good mac app, the fact that it has java code in it shouldn't even cross the user's mind.

  114. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you are the king of run-on sentences. Only one of your paragraphs is composed of more than one sentence. You have a single sentence with 119 words.

    It even looks like you're going for run-on words also, which I've only seen rarely.

    Outstanding work!

    (I know, you're not a native English speaker. I forgive you.)

  115. Re:When will by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

    1993 called. They want their FUD back.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT

    Back in the day, you needed some seriously expensive beefy (and sometimes exotic) hardware to do anything meaningful with Windows NT on PPC.

    If I recall correctly, the Xbox2 development platform runs an NT derivative on 970.

    --
    There are 1.1... kinds of people.
  116. Re:If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I couldn't have said it better. Although I think it's worth making clear that what you said about the menu bar is just one example of how developers can piss off users by assuming that Java applications should be run unmodified on the Mac.

    Drag and drop is a vital part of the Macintosh user interface. Java developers often neglect to implement it. Same with packaging and application metadata, application services, even the dock menu. Java developers often -- I'll go so far as to say "almost always" --completely ignore these important parts of the Mac operating environment, either blithely unaware of them or under the sadly mistake impression that users just won't miss them.

    Like I said, if developers want Apple to give a shit about Java, they're going to need to start giving a shit about Apple.

  117. Re:If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 1
    I think the problem is that if you look on the Sun Swing tutorials, they all have a line in them that sets the app to "default look and feel." So everyone puts those lines in his Java app. "Default" must be the correct setting, right? Wrong! Default look and feel means the Java default look and feel, as opposed to the platform-dependent look and feel. The Java LnF is ugly ugly ugly and it works differently from all the other apps on your system. I never adjust the LnF; I'll use whatever the JRE wants to give me. Sun makes a big deal about plugable LnF and being able to switch LnF. I think that's a bug, not a feature. Your app should run with whatever LnF the host environment wants to impose on it, and it should be difficult or impossible to change this.

    I'll be putting up some screenshots of my app in the next couple of weeks. If I can find someone who has OS 10.4 I'll even put up some Mac screenshots. I'm very curious to see if Mac users will think of it as a Mac desktop app; I would take that as a compliment, of course.

    From what I can tell, there are two things holding Java back from desktop apps. First is that Swing itself is hard to use and cumbersome. It is too powerful and not intuitive enough to program in. Yes it has some great features but there should be simpler, more direct ways of doing common things. Second, Java is closed source. This is a problem because we need forks of the JRE. We need a Qt fork, which does all the rendering in Qt. We need a GTK fork, a Mac fork, etc. These would all have the same language and run the same software but they would use native rendering, which is the only way you're going to get real native LnF, which is the only way you're going to get people to think of Java apps as "just like any other app".

  118. Ribbon cables? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > so I never have to see a fucking ribbon cable again

    Why do kids hate ribbon cables so much? My eight year-old keeps pulling the ones out of my case and his friends make bad jokes about them. They work well and have for decades.

    It's just like with case screws. My 13 year-old son whines because he has a case that requires removing two screws to open. Why is that such a problem?

    Sigh, kids today are too lazy to plug-in a ribbon cable or use a screwdriver.

  119. Call me... by payndz · · Score: 1

    ...when OS X 10.4.1 goes gold!

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  120. Re:If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 1

    By the way, the Mac Mini was the most brilliant move Apple has done to get more developers to experiment with the Mac. Hmm, let's see, it costs $600 (out the door), it uses all my existing peripherals, it takes up negligible space on my desk... I'll take one! I'll probably buy one just so that I can make sure that this new educational learning application runs smoothly on OS X 10.4. This Mac Mini could result in a lot more Mac software.

  121. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by thesixthreplicant · · Score: 0
    Last night was the first time that i needed to use sudo on my Mac

    I felt kinda good...and dirty...at the same time

    :)

  122. Re:Apple... by vingt · · Score: 1

    Bullshit meaning that scenario could not happen?

    Yes. Exactly. Current machines have (for *quite* some time) shipped with Panther. The poster to whom you extend your misplaced support talks about just having purchased *Jaguar* at that high price? They're either trolling or incredibly stupid. You just didn't spot it.

  123. Kzin by Farrside · · Score: 1

    I, for one, will purchase a retail copy of our new felinoid overlords...

  124. Re:torrent link? by tao · · Score: 1

    Student ADC memberships ARE for free. They don't include a free copy of MacOS X though =)

  125. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by dirkstoop · · Score: 1

    haha, after re-reading my post I can't imagine other people going through thát amount of trouble to read it.. :-)

    just skipped a night and yes, exactly, I'm no native speaker, how'd you guess? ;-)

    --
    (may read 'IMHO' wherever omitted from above text)
  126. Java is Tiger's .net by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    While I've not seen a huge number of Java apps on the Mac, I think Apple likes to keep up support because it offers a more mainstream alternative to Objective C for those that like to dabble.

    Plus while there may not be a huge number of consumer apps, there are a lot of little Java applications all over, things like Puzzle Pirates or enterprise apps.

    So while it will help for more people to write mac Java apps, a think it has a strong foundation of support.

    Myself, I am really looking forward to both tigers quite a bit!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  127. No April fool's joke... by Domini · · Score: 1

    If you bothered to go to the AppleInsider link you would have noticed the article was posted:

    "Thursday, March 31, 2005"

    Never mind April... you're just the vanilla fool.

  128. the natives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The natives are easily amused by baubles and glass beads, it seems.

  129. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by ickoonite · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hear hear!

    I was in a vaguely similar boat, though I can't ever claim to have been a Linux sysadmin - certainly not outside the home anyway. All our machines at home were Windows XP, mostly self-built, and we had Linux for NAT, etc. But all the machines were a constant hassle. The only thing I can be thankful for is that this was before spyware and its ilk got really big, so I never had to deal with much of that.

    Anyway, I got an iBook in 2002, after playing around on a very sexy PowerMac G4 server (it had 1.25GB RAM, which was not unimpressive at the time). Looking back now, it was quite crude - Internet Explorer for the web browser, no X11, no Quartz Extreme - but I still switched, and haven't looked back.

    Granted, it's a little weird if you're coming from a Linux-centric background - each UNIX has its own ways of doing things and Darwin is no different in this respect - but you can still get down to the nitty-gritty and write your own ipfw configuration if it floats your boat. And, though Fink seems slightly stagnated of late, running KDE on your Mac is just plain cool (from a "because you can" point of view, anyway).

    Keep an open mind - I know a friend of mine was a little upset at first because he couldn't start Apache with apachectl start. I was a little terse with him in reply, pointing out that Apple, champion of the GUI, could hardly expect a horde of headstrong OS9 GUI diehards to open up a Terminal to start a web server. Once I pointed him towards the Sharing tab, all was fine.

    The wireless implementation is unparalleled. Having taken my first steps in the WiFi world on a Mac, it pains me to use Windows' or Linux efforts (the latter I am having particular trouble with at home). Bluetooth is beautiful - you will, I am sure, find BluePhoneElite and Salling Clicker amusing if not essential toys. iPhoto is really, really nice; iMovie HD is just totally cool...

    You almost take it for granted in fact. I installed iTunes on a friend's Windows XP machine the other day, and she was almost bowled over (she has rather poor balance) by the simplicity of iTunes. I now think of it as nothing special, but to someone who has suffered under WiMP for so long, it is truly refreshing.

    In the end, all the machines at home now are Macs, save for one Linux server which still does NAT, mostly for my amusement so that I can continue to hack when I want. But I really think you hit the nail on the head with this...

    I mess around with things enough at work and home. When I want to play, I have plenty of things to play with. But I want something that I don't have to think about unless I want to. I don't want to have to edit a single god damn configuration file to accomplish the above tasks.

    I think I can sum it up succinctly with a line that is sure to appeal to at least the more mature and competent (i.e. less l33t t33n h4x0r) type that reads /. "Hack 'cause you want, not 'cause you have to." Hacking actually becomes fun again. And surely that's something quite hard to put a price on?

    iqu :)

  130. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your friend couldn't start apache on OS X with apachectl start, he was doing something wrong, most likely not being root.

  131. let the fun begin by idlake · · Score: 1

    And the reason there's zero demand for it is because Java applications that are ported to the Mac have so far been done very sloppily, resulting in a bad user experience all around.

    Oh, what fun. On the one hand, we have vociferous Java WORA advocates, who claim that no platform adaptation is needed, and on the other hand, we have vociferous Mac advocates, who complain if applications don't look exactly the way they are used to. Please, do let the fun begin and slug it out.

    What's particularly fun about this is that Java hackers are probably some of Apple's most loyal customers, and that Apple desparately needs a successor to Objective-C and all they got is Java. This will be interesting to watch.

    1. Re:let the fun begin by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why do we "desperately need a successor to Objective-C?" Is Objective-C going somewhere?

      In point of fact, most of those great new technologies that everybody is raving about would not be practical without Objective-C. Core Data, for instance, could not be implemented practically in either C or Java because of its dependence on features of the Objective-C runtime.

      And we're kinda just starting to really take advantage of what Objective-C can bring to the party.

  132. Re:If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives by idlake · · Score: 1

    It is developers who think that Java applications run as-is who are responsible for the shitty java applications on OS X today.

    They think that because that's Sun's party line.

    Java apps which 'run' on the mac are often not even tested to see how they behave.

    Of course not. Java is WORA. You shouldn't have to test on more than one machine.

  133. Re:torrent link? by drdink · · Score: 1

    I am ADC Student and received copies of Panther. I received 10.3.0, and I received 10.3.6(or something around there) when they refreshed the version they shipped. I'm expecting to see 10.4.0 come in the mail as well.

    --
    Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
  134. Re:torrent link? by drdink · · Score: 1

    And I just reread your comment. The Student ADC memberships are *not* free. ADC Student costs $99/yr and includes a one-time ADC hardware discount as well.

    --
    Beware, Nugget is watching... See?
  135. Re:torrent link? by tao · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, then what is the free ADC membership called? I know I got one for free...

  136. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Besides that, all the linux-geeks I know either want one, already have one or don't need one since they've gotten themselves an iBook. but that's not such a large part of the people we get in our store.

    I am a Linux geek. I have an iBook (one of the new 12" G4s, bought just before they came out - thanks to the Apple store for automatically upgrading my order). I want a Mac mini so I can retire my Lintel box to be an oversized, loud gaming console. A dualboot setup lets me choose whether I want to be able to keep in touch with the rest of the world (as I don't want my emails spread out over two OSes) or be able to just fire up a game and have some fun - but it doesn't allow both, as I dislike Windows enough to not want do do anything except playing games on it.
    The iBook is nice, but as my demands for desktops are radically different from those for a notebook it's not an option as a replacement desktop.

    The Mini, especially as it now comes with Tiger, fits my needs just fine. Now I just need to get my hands on a few hundred bucks...

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  137. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Um...root is disabled by default on OSX. He likely didn't use sudo. Even though he no doubt was logged in as an admin user, sudo is still needed. This fooled a CS teacher at my school, who has started switching from Sun and SGI to Macs.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  138. Re:Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this guy is trolling.

    Panther was the previous version of osX not Jaguar.
    Jaguar hasn't been for sale for 'ages' now.

    BTW: If you don't like an OS that actually shows improvement almost every year, you should stick with XP.

  139. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by MikePikeFL · · Score: 1
    That is exactly what I asked on the day they came out when I bought mine. The Apple person on the phone said Tiger would be free or $20.

    Awesome! I have been following the Tiger news recently, and placed my order for a PowerBook on March 30th. Since at that time the speculation was for the end of April... Maybe later.

    So if you must know, I'm responsible for the timely release. I finally saved up enough, dropped the cash, and now that my PowerBook is in the air on its was from China, Tiger goes gold...
    --
    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway" -Andrew Tanenbaum
  140. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'll also add to that line of people waiting for Tiger to get their Mini - and to fall into that 'slightly geeky on a budget' category. Enough that I still spend 80% of my working day in vi!

    Not quite in the market for a full system upgrade, plus I'm the sort of person who buys their Hi-fi in components - I like the ability to upgrade my display without throwing the whole computer out - and vice versa. I'd actually pay for a headless G5 over a mini, even if it was the size of a pizzabox - I'm just not prepared to buy an all in one unit.

    I think what you will get is a second generation of switchers once they've seen the first in use.
    For instance, my wife knew what an iPod was (and had an MP3 player when they first came out), but wanted and bought an iPod after I got mine. I would wager now (if I wasn't an Anonymous Coward) that her next laptop will be an iBook once she's played with the Mini.

    And to concur with a couple of posters above - I bought MS Office for my wife, as I was spending too much time coming home and supporting OpenOffice document compatibility issues - I have better things to be doing with my time. (Still peanuts compared to the nightly crashes and tri-monthly re-installation of Windows - although to be fair, we have another machine that is rock-solid, and Apple chuck out some duds too).

    Firefox, on the other hand, has been a hit with everyone I've forced it on, and I've not had to explain the philosophy of open source to any of them.

    Given the number of people who pirate their software, it's all 'free' anyway.

    'It's the software, stupid' - and that's what will sell the Mini.

  141. Cunning? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
    Announce on April Fool's day, and then just mine the April Fool's posts on slashdot for good ideas!

    Cunning if Jobs wants to short his own stock. I'm sorry, did you just say "mine slasdot for good ideas?"

    I know it's only 8:00, but that'll probably be the funniest thing I hear all day.

  142. I felt just like you a couple of years ago by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    I had 3 linux computers and 1 windows 2000 machine. As of today I have 3 computers, one is my PowerMac Dual G5 2.0ghz, another is my iBook G3 700mhz dual booting between OS X and Ubuntu, and the newest addition is my Mac mini. My Mac mini is running Ubuntua 5.04 on it. I still have a need for a Linux desktop (I think). I probably could have done without it, but its just too cool of a little computer. Like you said, if I find I don't really have a need for it, I'll put it on Ebay and almost recoup my costs.

  143. Everything's one year older in Japan by acb · · Score: 1

    Only in Japan, where, by convention, ages are counted from 1; i.e., a new-born baby is considered to be of age 1.

    1. Re:Everything's one year older in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Only in Japan, where, by convention, ages are counted from 1; i.e., a new-born baby is considered to be of age 1."

      that doesn't even make sense. 1 what? it can't be years... what are the units MAN, the UNITS!!!?

    2. Re:Everything's one year older in Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And even more... the age increments on January 1 (or on lunar New Year for some), so a baby born on Dec 31 is age two on the following day. Makes for some interesting conversations when talking to young ladies...

  144. OS upgrade discs vs. first-class OS install discs by acb · · Score: 1

    How long does it usually take for brand new Macs to have the new OS as a first-class installable CD, without the inconvenience of having to install the previous OS and upgrade it? Once 10.4 appears in shops, are all new Macs guaranteed to come with first-class standalone 10.4 CD/DVDs, or does it depend on clearing out the backlog of machines with 10.3 and 10.4 upgrade discs?

  145. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by nine-times · · Score: 1

    I think his overall point is still stands though-- these days, most Mac people buying Macintoshes are either long-time Apple users (who tend to follow Apple's moves fairly closely) or computer-geek-types who are [at least] moderately knowledgable. The computer-illiterates and know-nothings (the sort who wouldn't pay any attention to OS upgrades) think of Windows as the default, and so that's what they buy and that's what they use. Or at least that's a harsh but semi-accurate generalization.

  146. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by jargoone · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bluetooth is beautiful - you will, I am sure, find BluePhoneElite and Salling Clicker amusing if not essential toys.

    Thanks for the links. I was looking through some of the features of those tools. Doesn't OS X have some of the same features? I know that caller ID popup when a call comes in was built-in. I also heard once that "proximity monitoring" was built in, but I never confirmed that. Do you know? That was one of the big selling points for my wife: that her phone will be synced without her even taking it out of her purse.

    I installed iTunes on a friend's Windows XP machine the other day, and she was almost bowled over (she has rather poor balance) by the simplicity of iTunes.

    I had this exact experience 2 days ago. My friend and I heard this funny/stupid song at a bar last weekend. I had iTunes installed on my laptop already, but had never used the store, or the burn feature. I wanted to get this song and put it on a CD for humor's sake, but we were leaving soon and I was afraid I wouldn't have time. I already set up my account (5 free songs with PayPal sign up). Once I found the song, I think it was 5 clicks before I had it burned on a CD. Maybe this is possible with other software, I don't know. But I was impressed, and it makes me think there are more good things to come.

  147. The cheap upgrade window is NOT 30 days!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoops! You just got unknowingly bamboozled by a stupid Apple employee. Apple is notorious for not telling their employees (those not DIRECTLY working on a particular product) anything before an official announcement. They love secrecy, and employees are the biggest source of leaks. Thus you have people extremely low on the food chain like Apple Store workers who think they know something (they don't, they just read the rumor sites like everyone else) and want to sound all helpful and smart. Unfortunately you fell victim to this.

    History shows that Apple has only ever given a free/cheap upgrade to people who bought on or after the day they announced the exact release date. That means if you bought before they announce Tiger's release date, you're out of luck.

    The common myth that floats around is either 30 days or 60 days, but history shows that it's completely false. Last time they announced Panther's release date 2 weeks ahead of time, and that 2 weeks was the only time in which you could get the cheap upgrade. Some people managed to stretch it a little by lying about their purchase date, but don't count on it.

    The moral of the story: if you are concerned about this (if you really really don't want to pay full price for Tiger), wait until AFTER Apple says something in an official announcement. Don't trust what a single employee tells you, especially one at the Apple Store. Unless that employee's last name is Jobs, you're probably only getting a guess. And if it's based on the common myth, it's probably false.

    1. Re:The cheap upgrade window is NOT 30 days!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an Apple Store employee, I can tell you this is true.

      Whenever someone asks me the Tiger-upgrade questions (price, date of eligibility for free/reduced upgrade), I give this answer, almost word for word:

      "Apple has not released information concerning the upgrade. I can tell you what they have done in the past (full $129 upgrade from prior versions, with a computer purchase within two weeks making you eligible for free/reduced upgrade). That said, the only definite information will come when Apple officially announces Tiger. Apple has officially said Tiger will be coming in the first half of 2005. I take that to mean the May/June timeline."

      The most presumptuous question I ever received: "So, Apple will be updating the iMacs when they release Tiger next month?"

      I gave the standard answer: "Apple has not officially said anything about either thing, so I cannot confirm nor deny anything. That said, I am the last person to know anyway, so you are definitely asking the wrong person."

      Try it - check out any Apple Store on the announcement date of any product. You are likely to see several of the employees gathered around one of the computers, reading up on the product.

    2. Re:The cheap upgrade window is NOT 30 days!! by iowannaski · · Score: 1

      Which part of the grandparents post are you refuting? You seem to be in complete agreeance, as far as I can tell.

      --
      i forget
  148. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by hackstraw · · Score: 1

    I want a machine that will allow my wife and I to use with sessions running simultaneously. I want mail and printing and scanning to work right. I want Bluetooth syncing to our phones and my wife's Tungsten to work. I want to be able to use my iPod, and my digital camera, and edit videos. I want it to all be integrated, and I want it to, yes, "just work".

    I think a Mac is ideal for you and your wife. The transition takes a while, and no OS X is not perfect, but considering the alternatives, its better than all of them, especially for what you want to use it for.

    I mess around with things enough at work and home. When I want to play, I have plenty of things to play with. But I want something that I don't have to think about unless I want to.

    Me too. I'll warn you, my job satisfaction level has gone done since switching to a Mac for my personal machine at work. You ask yourself, "Why in 2005 am I still having to do XYZ to get PDQ done?"

    Have fun.

  149. Kzin by alispguru · · Score: 1

    Kzin are fast, powerful, honorable, intelligent... and a little paranoid. Not a bad match for an Apple fanboy...

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  150. Re:Apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Either he's a troll or he's really stupid; you can buy Jaguar for $18.

  151. Re:torrent link? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

    It's called an online membership.

  152. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by XbainX · · Score: 1
    Keep an open mind - I know a friend of mine was a little upset at first because he couldn't start Apache with apachectl start. I was a little terse with him in reply, pointing out that Apple, champion of the GUI, could hardly expect a horde of headstrong OS9 GUI diehards to open up a Terminal to start a web server. Once I pointed him towards the Sharing tab, all was fine.
    You actually can control apache from the command-line:
    `sudo apachectl start`
  153. How about paying for software licenses? by Name+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    You would be violating your licensing agreement by doing what you suggest.

    At least Apple understand about people with multiple machines and offers a family pack option for home use which saves a lot of money on licenses.

  154. I half-switched: not all deserts by zardie · · Score: 1

    I switched..sort-of.

    I love my unix. I love my Windows, too. I run several WIndows servers, FreeBSD machines, Solaris machines and Compaq Tru64. I've done the lot.

    As a desktop, my PowerBook G4 15" 1.5Ghz fits the bill perfectly. I love it. It's a computer that's fun to use - I can access the unix stuff when I need it and I can tuck it away when I've simply had too much and just want to use my PC, without spending ten hours to set up (hello Debian users). Sometimes us geeky types like to use a computer to do other stuff other than tinker. The Mac is brilliant at that.

    That said, if I want real Linux, dual boot is there and PPC arch handles it gracefully.

    My gripes lie with iPhoto - it won't support the Canon 1Ds Mk II camera nor will it support the CR2 raw format that's been available from the 20D and the 1Ds II for several months prior to iPhoto 5's release. iPhoto won't support the Nikon D1X or the D2x for that matter, so it's a major hit for pro photographers. iPhoto can do wonderful things with my raw shots from the 10D however.

    iMovie HD is kinda cool, but I've yet to get my hands on an HD camcorder to give it a test-run.

    I still have a Dell P4 mobile 2Ghz notebook that I use for my imaging and gaming purely because the support exists. The Mac is not the holy grail, although it's a good fit for most people. Tiger and the Mac Mini would be the perfect suggestion for any unix geek to pick up an alternate architecture though.

    1. Re:I half-switched: not all deserts by ickoonite · · Score: 1

      Sometimes us geeky types like to use a computer to do other stuff other than tinker.

      Exactly. We have lives and stuff to get on with too.

      My gripes lie with iPhoto

      Yeah, it ain't perfect. I'm lucky, in that I have the Kiss Digital/300D/Digital Rebel, which works fine, but I can see that it's a right bugger if it doesn't, and, from what you say, the lack of support is rather inexplicable. And I've got over 15,000 photos in my library, so it's not the fastest thing in the world. :P

      ...Dell...notebook...for gaming...

      Yeah, it makes sense. I'm no fan of Dell's more recent kit (we used to have Dell machines back in the day when they built expensive, quality machines, rather than the cheapo stuff they churn out today), but for the most part it works, and the games point is inarguable - the right tool for the job. It'll be a fair while (if ever) before developers start taking Mac gaming seriously again.

      The thing that pains me about Windows is the maintenance. I am just about to go and do a complete reinstall for a friend. He is pretty cautious with how he uses his machine because of my persistent badgering, but his other friends when using it less so, and as a consequence now, no sooner than you connect to the Internet and it is saturating upstream bandwidth with what I presume to be spam-sending. It's painful how an Athlon 64 3400+ can be reduced to molasses-like speeds...

      iqu :D

  155. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by tf23 · · Score: 1

    I never thought I would be this way

    Welcome to the slashdot-burnt-out-geek-swicher's club.

    You will be more then happy.

    I find I'm not fucking with the machines in the house nearly as much. Not because I have to (got enough of that at work). Now it's because I want to. I didn't buy a mini, it didn't exist back then. We bought a refurb iBook for the family (I got a 15" Powerbook).

    Been very happy with it ever since.

  156. Re:If this isn't a joke, it means Java 1.5 arrives by micromuncher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like I said, if developers want Apple to give a shit about Java, they're going to need to start giving a shit about Apple.

    I couldn't think of a more flawed statement. For the last 10 years developers have been hounding Apple to give them support that made them contenders. WWDC 1996 "Apple is going to be the #1 Java development platform..." followed by the slowest deployments and poor implementations. Apple blamed Sun, but the reality was the group was understaffed (not to mention staffed with newbs - I was recruited for the 1.2 port.)

    In 1997 my company stopped using Mac as a development platform because we needed current JDK and working JDBC support.

    Being in the sci-tech and engineering field, the biggest complaint since 1991 has been the lack of tools running on Macs. Java gave Apple an opportunity REGARDLESS of UI because sci-tech Java apps supposedly run anywhere, and its not a matter of reimplementing the application, as you Swing LAF is swappable (if you do it the way you're supposed to.) Making an argument that Apple users won't use software that isn't Mac-like is bunk when its the functionality thats important.

    So, as I guy who hounded Apple for 10 years before giving up, I can honestly say that giving a shit about Apple and asking for current support and bug fixes did absolutely nothing.

    And this whole "build it Mac-like and they'll come" is bullshit. Even Apple doesn't follow the once sacred UI guidelines anymore (think of the metal iWhatever interface.) This cliquey religious mentality is exactly the reason why Apple lost so much ground in sci-tech. Evangelism decided they'd only support "killer apps", and unfortunately in many verticals, there isn't such a thing. Why do I give a hoot about dnd support in an image processing app or a spreadsheet?

    My .02.

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  157. Impact of Windows 64? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a feeling the pending availability of Windows 64 has more to do with the decision to go gold with Tiger.
    After all the (arguable) hype Apple made of the PowerMac G5 being the first 64-bit desktop computer, I'm sure Apple would like to claim Tiger is the first mainstream 64-bit OS.

  158. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by vertinox · · Score: 1

    I couldn't agree more. I actually had a conversation with a customer over the phone this week while we were rebooting his Winxp box to see if a reg hack worked (He was having word 2003 issues) and he asks me what I use at home.

    I paused because it seemed rather awkward at the moment but I finally replied:

    "I use a Mac."

    And he seemed rather surprised as I was awkward because we are a major Microsoft software support group and to them we seem to do amazing things to get our clients machines back up and running (reg hacks, spyware removal, getting Outlook and Word to function correctly and Winxp tcp/ip stacks to work again).

    "Why?" was exactly his answer and then there was silence.

    I thought for a bit and then replied "I don't want to take my work home with me."

    He chuckled at that and I elaborated "Just because I can fix anything on a Windows computer doesn't mean I want to spend the time fixing it on my own."

    That and I noticed ever since I've got an Xbox (and later a DS) is that I don't use the PC's that I do have. If I need to do constructive things like Word, Excel, Email (Thunderbird), Surf (Firefox), Photoshop, IM then I always use the Mac.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  159. 6 to 7 by hawk · · Score: 1

    It was beyond "major". Most of it was replaced.

    Programs that actually followed the guidelines still worked. Others (Early Macwrite, Word 3 and down, *all* viruses, most system utilities) were ended.

    I was a developer at the time, and used both the alpha and beta releases. The alpha release was significantly more stable than the Windows 3.1 and 95 families.

    hawk

  160. Chip released October 1999 by wernst · · Score: 1

    Wienee. ;-)

  161. No way by bogie · · Score: 1

    Sorry but if you said 4% maybe 5% I'd agree, but >10% mac use is nothing but a fantasy. I've done plently of home and office computer work over the years and Macs don't come anywhere near to being in 1 out of every 10 households. That's not me being anti-apple or anything that's just what I've seen from an IT and non-IT standpoint. In fact among my family, friends, and my wife's friends and family I can't think of any who own a Mac.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  162. My estimate is skewed by my perception. by JQuick · · Score: 1

    I live outside of boston.
    My friends are scientists, engineers, writers, etc.
    Thus some (the non-techies) have been mac users for a long time.

    The majority of the geeks have migrated from BSD and Linux to Macos X.

    All told, my immediate environment is about 50% mac, and a few of us have been working with computers for 10-20 years but never owned a Microsoft box.

    Perhaps 5% is a more realistic estimate.

  163. Hat off to you. by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    you can right-click or ctrl-click on the "comment" field for slashdot submissions and tick "Spelling -> Check Spelling as you Type"

    I have been using Macs since 1992 and Apple machines since 1983. I switched to OS X near the end of the Jaguar epoch, not quite believing that it would be fast on my 1998 PCI graphics G4 (it was). I'd read about spellchecking in text fields for Carbon-based apps but figured something was wrong with my install.

    Your clear instructions have changed everything for me. My brain is built to spell (literary type), but I need the red dots to draw my attention to on-screen errors which are harder for me to notice than print errors.

    So, thank you, sir. This absolutely rocks!

    --
    blog
    1. Re:Hat off to you. by Smurf · · Score: 1

      Well, since that made you so happy, here you have an extra tip:

      If you regularly need to type in different languages, type Command-shift-; on a Cocoa text field (works for some Carbon apps too). This brings up the Spelling floating window where you can easily switch the language used for spell-checking.

      I have been a Mac user since 2003 and I'm amazed to discover sweet things like this frequently. Enjoy!

  164. sudo by bodrell · · Score: 1
    I only recently discovered
    sudo su
    It's nice to operate as root without having to type "sudo" every time I need to edit a system file. Not that I do it often, but sometimes the constant "sudo" gets laborious, especially with lengthy commands I've already typed.

    On a related note, is it possible to let a particular application have root permissions? Sometimes I like to edit system files with a GUI editor, and this always causes problems (when I need to write out my changes).

    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    1. Re:sudo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sudo -s gives you a root shell

    2. Re:sudo by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1
      Yes you can run GUI applications as root if you want ... just go to the Terminal and type:
      sudo open {application path}
      and type your password. I believe this will run the application as root, allowing you to edit system config files, etc. (If you're lazy, you can get the application path without typing or changing out of your working directory by just dragging the app's icon into the Terminal window. Drop, and it inserts the appropriate path from the filesystem root. Although I'm sure some hardcore CLI wizards will scoff at it, I'm a reasonably advanced user and I use it all the time.)


      I haven't tried doing this in a while, and the time I'm thinking of when I used it was probably OS 10.0, if that. If it doesn't work, I suppose the alternative would be going into NetInfo Prefs and enabling the 'real' root user and logging in as that (although I think that's generally bad practice except when absolutely necessary).

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:sudo by bodrell · · Score: 1
      Thanks for the tip, but I don't think that works anymore. I'm pretty sure I tried the
      sudo open
      route the first time around. And yeah, enabling the root login works, but I'm trying not to do that (I was running as root for way too long for this very reason). However, now that there is fast user switching, it might not be so terrible to login as root once in awhile . . . so I may go back to my perilous ways.

      Oh, and I might add that I never had problems reading the system files (probably because I am in the admin group), but when I tried to write my changes I got permission errors.

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
    4. Re:sudo by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Good to know -- thanks.

      Maybe you can use pico instead of a GUI editor? I'm pretty sure that sudo pico works.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    5. Re:sudo by bodrell · · Score: 1
      Maybe you can use pico instead of a GUI editor? I'm pretty sure that sudo pico works.

      Yes, sudo pico definitely works. What's most frustrating is when I've made major modifications to a file with pico, then can't write out my changes. Well, at least I can't write them to the file I want. I'm sure there must be some way to change permissions of a GUI application (this is also relevant if you want to do some silly hack like change the bootup image in Photoshop, which I did back in the day when I logged in as root; I don't know of any decent CLI image editors ;)).

      Hell, Tiger is coming out in less than three weeks, so everything may have changed.

      --
      Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar
  165. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by iowannaski · · Score: 1
    I watch a fair amount of TV. The only Apple commercial running since the superbowl has been the single stupid iteration of the ipod shuffle spot.

    God I hate that ad.

    --
    i forget
  166. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by ickoonite · · Score: 1

    I'm not aware that the Caller ID thing is built-in, but then, I'm not that familiar with Bluetooth - it's my brother's setup that has the Bluetooth phone and adapter, and whilst I've played with it a bit, I was under the impression that you had to install something for CID to work. Proximity monitoring - for the screensaver and such - likewise. But then I don't really know.

    iqu :)

  167. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by ickoonite · · Score: 1

    The aforementioned friend is the kind of guy that would make that sort of mistake - he has a little knowledge, but not a lot. Doubtless the need to be root (by whatever means) to start Apache escaped him - and why it didn't then work.

    iqu :)

  168. NeXT STEP had this feature in 1990! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This feature was added to NeXT STEP in 1990! Microsoft Windows was at version 3.0 at the time.

    http://www.aci.com.pl/mwichary/guidebook/timelines

    Sine OS X is really OpenStep in Mac OS X clothing, all Cocoa applications get on the fly spell check for free.

  169. Re:expect... No, they DO ask it all the time by jargoone · · Score: 1

    Apple's site says that the Address Book application will do CID. Linky: http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=517 80

    You're probably right about the proximity syncing...

  170. Ok, its April 3rd now.... by xjerky · · Score: 1

    ...so where's the announcement???

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
  171. Re:fp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    12106917GET

  172. Just switch to PPC linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You won't need to worry about update CD's or paying for upgrades to your OS ever again.

  173. found an answer by bodrell · · Score: 1
    Mac OS X Hints has a couple of solutions to the problem. There were some interesting comments, including the following:
    I discovered, while I was writing this, that "sudo open < filepath" won't launch as sudo. /me thinks it's because sudo executes an Apple app called "open" that digs into the app package and opens the app. Problem is, the app doesn't get executed as root....only the package opener does. Not sure why that is the way it is, but this seems to work pretty well (for Cocoa apps...)
    And here was an example that's supposed to work:
    sudo /Applications/TextEdit/Contents/MacOS/TextEdit &
    Although other people said you need to dig into the package contents like so:
    sudo /Applications/System\ Preferences.app/Contents/MacOS/System\ Preferences &
    --
    Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a soportar Si la vida me da palo, yo la voy a espabilar