Bezos just announced last week that they have over 110 million Prime subscribers. So an extra $20 a year means potentially another $2.2 billion in their pockets. Sure, they'll lose a few but the number that drop the service over the increase but the vast majority won't. I'd be surprised if even 5% didn't renew because of it.
Have fun setting up and managing 10 different systems. Enjoy having to bloat your app to be able to know how to work with 10 different systems rather than 1. Have a great time with different bugs across different systems. There's a reason companies don't do this.
There have been dating sites that only charge males, while females get their profiles free. They've gone without issue for a long time so it'd seem doing so based on age might not cause issues wither.
I'd get them a copy of General Relativity For Babies.
http://amzn.to/2Df5RKb
I've also gotten my nephew Quantum Physics For Babies. The entire series is wonderful.
This change has two benefits for Facebook:
1) Seeing more family and friend updates, and less business page posts, makes for a more enjoyable experience for users. This means they'll come back more, which in turn means more opportunities for Facebook to show them advertisements and make money.
2) Less brand Page posts means brands have to spend more on paid advertisements if they want to be seen by the more than 1.3 billion people that log on to Facebook daily. Again, more money for Facebook.
Facebook always tests these changes on a number of regions or states before choosing to roll them out across the entire network. If they're making this change, it's because they've seen positive response from their testing.
So you'll be able to make calls and text on your PC..... like macOS has offered for years?
The addition of running Android apps is nice. Though most of the most useful apps have a desktop counterpart that generally offers a better workflow, as it's been designed for use on the desktop.
Remember that there's zero requirement to upgrade. The processor still performs as originally claimed. It's only if they choose to be secure that they may see a performance hit. There was never any guarantee that there'd be no security issues or that performance would be as advertised always no matter what patching was applied.
The Tesla battery factory likely has the most battery power on the planet. That's like saying they'd be fine if they just had their own nuclear power station.
Fairbanks has a population of 32,751. This airport sees more than 839% more people come through in a single day. The two aren't anywhere near comparable.
They certainly have backup power for critical systems like air traffic but remember that an airport is basically a city. 275,000 people a day pass through that airport. The eleven different four-car trains there carry 200,000 people each day. The terminal is 6.8 million square feet. Just to keep some lights on so people don't panic requires a ton of backup power. Providing power for all the baggage handling, runway lights, and all other systems is a HUGE ask. Powering it during normal times likely takes damn near its own power plant. Running it on backup power would an insane requirement.
The vast majority of users have automatic updates turned on (which is the default in iOS) so all updates are downloaded automatically and they never see the release notes. Of those that do manually update, I'm sure only a small percentage of them bother to read the update notes. Why bother if only maybe 2% of your users look at your notes? Seems a waste of time and effort which could be put towards more important things.
With an average computer, you can hope to make less than 50 in a month of mining after downloading there ~160GB ledger and starting to mine. You'll spend well over that in electricity to mine that coin.
"This averages out to a shocking 215 kilowatt-hours (KWh) of juice used by miners for each Bitcoin transaction (there are currently about 300,000 transactions per day). Since the average American household consumes 901 KWh per month, each Bitcoin transfer represents enough energy to run a comfortable house, and everything in it, for nearly a week. On a larger scale, De Vries' index shows that bitcoin miners worldwide could be using enough electricity to at any given time to power about 2.26 million American homes."
https://motherboard.vice.com/e...
Bitcoin uses 215 kilowatt-hours (KWh) of power for each transaction. That could power the average American home for almost a week.
It's incredibly wasteful. I believe recently they'd said bitcoin mining is currently using more power monthly than the entire country of Nigeria uses in a year.
Generally the majority of reviews come out the Thursday before the release. This has been the case in past reviews and releases.
This was simply a little light demo for some YouTube folks. It's no different than when they allowed media members a quick hands-on after the Keynote.
I was down for having a constructive conversation around machine learning and AI until you pulled the "you're one of those people" piece. I never suggested teaching a computer to accept my own values, in fact I was suggesting it's not the road they're looking to go down. But thanks for making assumptions about others and negatively branding them. Fuck off.
I completely understand. My point was that if a child heard the word "gay" used in a negative connotation growing up, they'd believe it was a negative word. Being gay would be bad in their mind. That's exactly what has happened here. Because no one stepped in to help the API understand, it made its own inference based on available information in the way it's very commonly used on the internet.
In this case, Google didn't set out with instructive AI. They simply let it loose to learn on its own, rather than being instructive about how it learns and what is good or bad.
The API is learning as a child would with no parent to help guide and shape their world views as they grow. Exposed to hate speech and negative views, they don't have a reference, and so they come to believe those views are the standard.
Very likely her clients had searched for her too. Often times Facebook will show you people who have searched for your profile, even if they haven't friended you.
Slashdot Mirror
Bezos just announced last week that they have over 110 million Prime subscribers. So an extra $20 a year means potentially another $2.2 billion in their pockets. Sure, they'll lose a few but the number that drop the service over the increase but the vast majority won't. I'd be surprised if even 5% didn't renew because of it.
Have fun setting up and managing 10 different systems. Enjoy having to bloat your app to be able to know how to work with 10 different systems rather than 1. Have a great time with different bugs across different systems. There's a reason companies don't do this.
New app update appeared just after this announcement. You might find if you don't upgrade the app you won't see these new ads.
Where else can you find a speaker with beam forming for that price? Generally you have to look to spend about $20,000 to get that kinda setup.
There have been dating sites that only charge males, while females get their profiles free. They've gone without issue for a long time so it'd seem doing so based on age might not cause issues wither.
I'd get them a copy of General Relativity For Babies. http://amzn.to/2Df5RKb I've also gotten my nephew Quantum Physics For Babies. The entire series is wonderful.
This change has two benefits for Facebook: 1) Seeing more family and friend updates, and less business page posts, makes for a more enjoyable experience for users. This means they'll come back more, which in turn means more opportunities for Facebook to show them advertisements and make money. 2) Less brand Page posts means brands have to spend more on paid advertisements if they want to be seen by the more than 1.3 billion people that log on to Facebook daily. Again, more money for Facebook. Facebook always tests these changes on a number of regions or states before choosing to roll them out across the entire network. If they're making this change, it's because they've seen positive response from their testing.
So you'll be able to make calls and text on your PC..... like macOS has offered for years? The addition of running Android apps is nice. Though most of the most useful apps have a desktop counterpart that generally offers a better workflow, as it's been designed for use on the desktop.
Remember that there's zero requirement to upgrade. The processor still performs as originally claimed. It's only if they choose to be secure that they may see a performance hit. There was never any guarantee that there'd be no security issues or that performance would be as advertised always no matter what patching was applied.
Don't bother with the thermostat threat. Go right for where it hurts. Point out that PornHub will buffer like crazy.
The Tesla battery factory likely has the most battery power on the planet. That's like saying they'd be fine if they just had their own nuclear power station.
Fairbanks has a population of 32,751. This airport sees more than 839% more people come through in a single day. The two aren't anywhere near comparable.
They certainly have backup power for critical systems like air traffic but remember that an airport is basically a city. 275,000 people a day pass through that airport. The eleven different four-car trains there carry 200,000 people each day. The terminal is 6.8 million square feet. Just to keep some lights on so people don't panic requires a ton of backup power. Providing power for all the baggage handling, runway lights, and all other systems is a HUGE ask. Powering it during normal times likely takes damn near its own power plant. Running it on backup power would an insane requirement.
The vast majority of users have automatic updates turned on (which is the default in iOS) so all updates are downloaded automatically and they never see the release notes. Of those that do manually update, I'm sure only a small percentage of them bother to read the update notes. Why bother if only maybe 2% of your users look at your notes? Seems a waste of time and effort which could be put towards more important things.
With an average computer, you can hope to make less than 50 in a month of mining after downloading there ~160GB ledger and starting to mine. You'll spend well over that in electricity to mine that coin.
"This averages out to a shocking 215 kilowatt-hours (KWh) of juice used by miners for each Bitcoin transaction (there are currently about 300,000 transactions per day). Since the average American household consumes 901 KWh per month, each Bitcoin transfer represents enough energy to run a comfortable house, and everything in it, for nearly a week. On a larger scale, De Vries' index shows that bitcoin miners worldwide could be using enough electricity to at any given time to power about 2.26 million American homes." https://motherboard.vice.com/e...
Bitcoin uses 215 kilowatt-hours (KWh) of power for each transaction. That could power the average American home for almost a week. It's incredibly wasteful. I believe recently they'd said bitcoin mining is currently using more power monthly than the entire country of Nigeria uses in a year.
Generally the majority of reviews come out the Thursday before the release. This has been the case in past reviews and releases. This was simply a little light demo for some YouTube folks. It's no different than when they allowed media members a quick hands-on after the Keynote.
I for one am shocked that the price of parts for my $120k Porsche aren't cheap.
I was down for having a constructive conversation around machine learning and AI until you pulled the "you're one of those people" piece. I never suggested teaching a computer to accept my own values, in fact I was suggesting it's not the road they're looking to go down. But thanks for making assumptions about others and negatively branding them. Fuck off.
I completely understand. My point was that if a child heard the word "gay" used in a negative connotation growing up, they'd believe it was a negative word. Being gay would be bad in their mind. That's exactly what has happened here. Because no one stepped in to help the API understand, it made its own inference based on available information in the way it's very commonly used on the internet. In this case, Google didn't set out with instructive AI. They simply let it loose to learn on its own, rather than being instructive about how it learns and what is good or bad.
The API is learning as a child would with no parent to help guide and shape their world views as they grow. Exposed to hate speech and negative views, they don't have a reference, and so they come to believe those views are the standard.
Recently threw away a brand new CueCat. Worked at RadioShack in the '90s and we gave them away like candy.
Very likely her clients had searched for her too. Often times Facebook will show you people who have searched for your profile, even if they haven't friended you.
'90s kid me sheds a tear.