Domain: justfuckinggoogleit.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to justfuckinggoogleit.com.
Comments · 323
-
Re:It's obvious why they're *really* doing this
-
Re:Customization is King
I read your entire comment and I explained why it couldn't be done. Now die thank
- Only an idiot states that something is impossible, especially when there is solid evidence that it is possible. QED, you are an idiot.
- There are numerous examples of deformable terrain in the wild. In fact, you could find them by googling for "deformable terrain" which is exactly what I did. Most of them are not ready for prime time, but if they almost work today, we'll have enough processing power tomorrow. Thus again, you are an idiot.
- Wishing death on someone for correcting your idiot ass makes you a little bitch, in the bargain.
-
Re:GoogleFS and You
Pleeeeze enlighten us (with your zero background).
http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/ -
click me
-
This looks like a job for...
-
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important
Problem Report: Access denied to system because of URL Filter Configuration, while attempting to retrieve the URL: http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search.pl?quer
y =microsoft+bush+DOJ.
Message ID: Blocked by Websense Category: Tasteless
Problem Description: Your system was configured to deny access to this URL.
Possible Problem Cause: Request denied, as specified in the local filter list configuration.
Possible Solution: Traffic to and from the internet is being filtered and logged. Access to this site has been blocked according to * Policy. If there is a compelling business justification for access to this site to be permitted, please present your request to the IT management at your business unit for consideration.
Even Websense is in on the conspiracy, trying to hide it from us!
Me = sad panda :( -
Re:probably on Microsoft's list of next important
In fact one of the very first things Bush did when he entered the White House was remove all of the DOJ lawyers on the Microsoft monopoly case who had any legal experience with monopolies.
Could you please provide a link to this information? I was unable to find any.Especially this article from the first page of results: Slap on the wrist? (Salon.com)
-
Re:The pirate bay?
I greet you, on behalf of all Earthlings, with this link:
http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/ -
Re:Isn't that just the API?
-
Re:Interesting tech
If you had Googled, you would have hit this: Bloodless Surgery
-
Re:Who?
Uh, this is certainly not the first time this has come up on Slashdot. Do you expect the authors to explain what Linux is every time one of those stores comes up? If you're one of the 5% of Slashdot readers who didn't know what this story was about, do you think there might be a resource you could use?
-
Re:Data Rate?
300GB capacity at 20Mbps... Can someone check the math on that? I'm thinking overnight backups aren't even going to be possible.
A helpful hint for you... -
Re:Well, Not too "Bright", but...Be like me.
-
Re:Nothing new here. Move along.
Yes, just click here.
-
Re:Uhhh, What??
Google is your friend: R&B Coffee.
That's a very diplomatic response. I belive this;
http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/
is more traditional. -
This is a troll
I love Ask Slashdots when the answer is really to go to the oracle.
Honestly, there's web developers near you. We have websites. We know what we're doing. I'll do it if you're in my area - send an email to mudformike at yahoo dot ca and I'll get back to you. Give it to any of the other people who replied. We'll even tell you the language you should actually be doing this in for it to be sustainable.
ps - Web 2.0 is what we in the business call a "buzzword". It doesn't really mean anything and you can't program in it. If a client asked me to "program something up in Web 2.0" my fee would climb by 75%.
-
Re:bookmark synchronization
Yes! It can be found here.
-
Hmmm...
If only there were a way to search the Internet and find a particular page, perhaps by keyword...
You never know, you might find the answer to your question! -
Re:GLBT?
-
just my way...
Of course if you want to be 100% sure a format would work. DO NOT RUN A LOW LEVEL FORMAT! I seen it recommended it's just wrong... Low-level Formatting creates the Tracks and Sectors on a blank hard drive. The drives you buy today are Low-level Formatted at the factory. Low-level Formatting these hard drives yourself is not recommended.
But not everyone can or wants to go trough the trouble of formatting so what can we do next?
My standard way to get spyware of a box:
run crapcleaner this will remove a lot of useless files just make sure you only select the sections you want deleted. Don't use the reg clean unless you know what you're doing.
Next up would be the running the standard anti virus programs I personally use hitmanpro the site is dutch but the program is English it includes most trusted anti-spyware products and runs them all in a row and automatically removes anything and makes up a html page of what it did.
Still not gone?
- If you know the name of the spyware it might be worth googling chances are you find a special removal tool.
- In my case I can spot bad programma's and spyware as a process with the use of HijackThis and sysinternals process explorer. But be sure to google all the processes you don't trust before deleting them. This way of deleting is not recommended for your average computer user (then again you post on slashdot so your probably fine..)
- Some times it's required to boot in to safemode to remove some files
Ok now that you're cleaned you don't want this sort of thing to happen again there are a few common practices:
- Don't be YES man don't just click YES and NEXT on every box that pops-up also instruct any family members to do the same.
- Run as a normal user instead of administrator
- Make sure windows is up to date
- Some browsers such as firefox make it easier to avoid spyware though this requires some plugins. recommended are adblock + gblocklist
Useful links:
google: http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/ ;)
crapcleaner: http://ccleaner.com/
hitmanPro: http://hitmanpro.nl/
HijackThis: http://www.spywareinfo.com/~merijn/
Process explorer: http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/ProcessExplo rer.html
Firefox browser: http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/
adblock: https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?id=10&application=firefox
gblock list for adblock: https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.php ?id=1136&application=firefox
hope it helps... -
Re:Where do we get tritium from ?
The answer is JFGI!!!
-
Re:For any other company, it would just be a gimmiI see sticks, but I'm not seeing analog. At the very least, the default controller wasn't analog (something not even Sony managed until the PS2).
Sony managed it with the Playstation Dual Shock, which replaced the old playstation main system in stores in 1998/1999.
It didn't rumble. The dual analog controller was just that: a standard PSX controller with two sticks.
"This rumble feature is similar to the one featured on the first edition of the Japanese Dual Analog, a feature that was removed shortly after that controller was released." -- Wikipedia entry for DualShock. If you don't trust Wikipedia, JFGI, and you'll get more sites that note that the first edition of the Dual Analog in Japan did indeed have Force Feedback.
-
Seriously...
Well, the first places to check are all the old standards: Workopolis, Monster, LinkedIn. I would also try Orkut now, but I'm a hardcore Google Fanboy (though the countdown to evil began a while ago). The search terms - well, that's easy. I'd try "technical writer" first and nothing second. If someone cannot make their resume found when I type "technical writer" then they aren't that technical and I'm not hiring them.
The second place to check would be any local sites that may post classifieds-ish things.
So here's my general answer to the questions? Where do I check? The place that resumes get posted.
Of course, next time you have a question like this, I suggest that you jfgi...
-
Re:Here you go:
dude, you misspelled http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/search.pl?quer
y =linux+webcam+software -
Re:ex parte
Or here.
-
Re:Torrent for dungeon siege?
here.
-
Re:Linux Lover?
-
Re:Mac users
Even the semi-computer illerteate people I know use google and nothing else.
Exactly. My whole familiy uses Google. Hell, they use it as a verb. This shows that even non-tech savvy people know that Google is THE search engine. I mean, just look at http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/. No one made a justfuckingyahooit or justfuckingaskjeeves. -
Re:Welcome to economy 101
I'm suprised they aren't also setting up in Brazil.
A quick google search would tell you that Brazil is "free software's biggest and best friend".
-
Re:A chain of trust ...
Really? I missed that story - link please!I know Google helps the Chinese government censor the web by blocking certain search terms within China, but I wasn't aware they'd directly aided the Chinese in tracking down individual dissidents, like Yahoo! allegedly has.
-
Re:Sure they can.
-
Re:Live-CD?
I believe the link you're looking for is Just Fucking Google It!.
I'm still amazed by the number of people whose first reaction is to ask, rather than search. Christ, I'd be embarrassed to ask a question whose answer was on the first page of a simple search... -
Re:Export restrictions?They've been eased over the years, e.g. here is a list of articles.
In 2002 it was upped to 195,000 million theoretical operations per second, and the limit goes up automatically every six months. A typical PC in 2002 was 2000 MTOPs, so this allows export of some rather big honking systems.
-
Re:Poor Man's Wifi Antenna?
Of course. Here we go:
-
Links, history of Singularity
If you people would RTFB, you'd discover that the Singularity has a history of intellectual discussion going back around two decades. The treatments in science fiction are a part of that, but just reading the SF isn't going to get you much (any more than reading SF will teach you physics, or math, though it might serve to get you interested).
http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~phoenix/vinge/vinge-s ing.html
http://singinst.org/what-singularity.html
http://www.accelerationwatch.com/
And let's not forget:
http://justfuckinggoogleit.com/search.pl?query=Sin gularity
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technological_singula rity
The first person to use the term "Singularity" as applied to futurism was John von Neumann, and he used it to mean a disruptive change in the future brought about by a high level of technology.
The first person to postulate that recursive self-improvement in Artificial Intelligence would rapidly produce "ultraintelligent machines" was the Bayesian statistician I. J. Good. Today this is known as the "hard takeoff" scenario.
The first person to popularize the term "Singularity", referring to the breakdown in our model of the future which occurs subsequent to the (technological) creation of smarter-than-human intelligence, was the mathematician (and sometime SF author, and inventor of cyberspace) Vernor Vinge.
Kurzweil's "Singularity" belongs to the accelerating change crowd that includes John Smart. Their thesis is, first, that history shows a trend for major transitions to happen in shorter and shorter times, and second, that you can graph this on log charts, get reasonably straight lines, and extend the lines to produce useful quantitative predictions. I agree with the qualitative thesis but not the quantitative thesis.
In my opinion, Kurzweil could greatly strengthen many of his arguments by giving up on the attempt to predict when these things will occur, and just saying: "They will happen eventually." I think that it is just as important, and a great deal more probable, to say: "Eventually we will be able to create Artificial Intelligence surpassing human intelligence, and then XYZ will happen, so we better get ABC done first." Than to say: "And this will all happen on October 15th, 2022, between 7 and 7:30 in the morning."
Since I don't care particularly about when someone builds a smarter-than-human intelligence, just what happens after that, and what we need to get done before; and since I don't think that this necessarily needs to make life incomprehensible, so long as we do things right; I belong to the I.J. Good "hard takeoff" crowd. With a strong helping of Vernor Vinge, because I think there's a difference in kind associated with a future that contains mind smarter than human, which we do not get just from talking about flying cars, or space travel, or even nanotechnology.
On Slashdot, someone says "intelligence" and you think of all the computer CEOs with IQs of 120 and the starving professors with IQs of 160, and you think that means intelligence isn't important. But you will not find many excellent CEOs, nor professors, nor soldiers, nor artists, nor musicians, nor rationalists, nor scientists, who are chimpanzees. Intelligence is the foundation of human power, the strength that fuels our other arts. Respect it. When someone talks about enhancing human intelligence or building smarter-than-human AI, pay attention. That is what matters to the future, not political yammering, not our little nation-tribes. In 200 million years nobody's going to give a damn who flew the first flying car or -
Is it a joke?
Your [sic] a fool if you think that postgres can replace Oracle.
Oh, my a fool, right?
Most large organizations are never going to trust something without a service agreement.
Indeed. That's why they buy professional support I guess... Seriously, is it really that hard to use Google for God's sake? I'm not even going to read the rest of your troller posting. -
Re:Queue Apple Apologists in 3... 2...
Then why can't I play songs purchased from iTunes on my Creative player?
There are two possible answers to this FAQ:
- Because you haven't bothered stripping the DRM off the files yet.
- "Why can't I play songs purchased from some crappy site that only deals in DRM'd WMA on my iPod?"
-
Might there be even bigger, and maybe better?
So eBay purchases Skype, thereby vastly increasing its effective client base. Not what I would have predicted - everyone's favourite not-being-evil search organisation didn't get to buy Skype after all.
But imagine the power in a purchase or alliance the two ultra heavyweights... EBay's worth too much for Google to buy outright at current prices (> $50bn) but the resulting search and information possibilities would be mind boggling if they could integrate effectively.
- M -
Re:But....
-
Re:Interesting
-
Re:What is it?
Have you been in a coma, a cave, or just high on dope for the past year?
And to be honest, I think even if someone told you, you wouldn't have a clue. I mean, apparently you don't know what Google is either. -
Re:WPA2, not WPA
just google it ?
E.g. this Axis even supports WPA2. -
Duh
Rather than connecting directly to Yahoo's or Hotmail gateways, use your ISP's mail relay. That's what it's there for.
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/ -
Re:Hmmm...
First Google hit looking for firefox ie skin. HAND
-
Re:One way to be sure it's secure
If you had taken a few seconds to look, you would have seen that people can get fungal infections in their fingernails as well - especially women who use artificial nails or nail polish, both of which trap moisture under the nail.
-
Re:Amazon.com is the Walmart of online retailThere's always some place that will sell you the same shit (or better) for less, so there's no need to overpay by boycotting Amazon.
You can always look for it on the web, you know.
-
Re:I can't send money
It's KING of Prussia, pal, a community about a half hour from Philadelphia PA, near Valley Forge. Yes, THE Valley Forge, where Washington's troops weathered a bitter winter during the American Revolutionary War.
King of Prussia has a LOT of office complexes, and one of the largest malls in the country. I saw Batman Begins at the IMAX near the King of Prussia mall. It was so dope, yo.
ONE SEARCH for "King of Prussia" on google.com led me to this page, where you can read all about how King of Prussia got its name. Surely you had time for THAT, before you went "wtf", no? Here's another link you might find useful. -
Re:Partnering with Sun?
Show me proof.
Well, since you apparently are too lazy to use google, I guess I'll have to do it for you then. Here you go, champ. Or specifically, see the table here for the actual results.
There you'll see that a 24 cpu F25K scores 11631.1 MB/s in the TRIAD benchmark (you can choose COPY, ADD or SCALE instead for that matter, the results are similar), a 144 cpu F25K 76097.8 MB/s, a 4 cpu Opteron (called AMD_Opteron_848) 15921.0 MB/s, and finally a 64 cpu IBM p5-595 173564.2 MB/s. And just like I said in my previous post, those numbers show that a 4 cpu Opteron beats a 24 cpu F25K, and a 64 cpu IBM beats the highest end 144 cpu sun pretty badly.
I haven't seen any of these memory bandwidth benchmarks, but I'm pretty sure you're talking out your ass because the MINIMUM configuration for an F25K is 36 CPUs.
Well, nobody said that you have to use all the available processors when running the benchmark. Actually, looking at the email where the Sun engineer submitted the benchmark results, it looks like all the benchmarks where run on the same machine. Running with different numbers of cpu:s is actually a pretty interesting benchmark, since it shows how well the bandwidth scales with increasing cpu numbers. In this case, one can see that the bandwidth per cpu scales almost linearly for the F25K, which is a good result for a big shared memory box. Unfortunately that doesn't really change the fact that the bandwidth per processor actually isn't that impressive.
Oh, right, you were just trolling and spouting the typical anti-Sun pro-IBM Slashbot FUD.
Oh right, you were just spouting the same old "Sun computers are better since they have much more memory bandwidth than pc class computers" that was true in the early 1990:s, without actually checking whether it still holds (Hint: it doesn't). -
Re:He'll still make it...even for NewLine
I enjoy it when people talk out of their ass.
Except that he's pretty much correct, at least on the shady accounting front. You can throw a stone and hit an example from the artists where people talk about the creative accounting practices used when the RIAA or the MPAA want to make sure that a movie or album has $0 profit.
As for whether <insert major corporation here> is out to get "money money money", well, every third post on slashdot is by a corporate apologist saying that making money is the only responsibility corporations have, which is usually right, unless the charter indicates otherwise. I assume that New Line's charter is newer than the Civil War-generation "paradigm shift" when corporations changed from being chartered for the public good to being chartered for profit.
As for whether Jackson is taking it personally, he'd have to show up himself and let us know. -
Re:This happens more than you know4 words: willful ignorance, due dilligence
- Nobody is forcing you to advertise on the net (which even in 1999 was already the LEAST effective means of advertising, and has gotten worse in terms of credibility, results per dollar spent, etc)
- Nobody is forcing you to use the agencies you mentioned. Its not hard to check out the people you're dealing with. That you don't is the hallmark of the wilfully ignorant who don't do their due diligence
- Contrary to what you state, its very easy to control how your ads get distributed - just put in a clause that provides financial penalties if they use adware/spyware. Agencies that won't agree to that are obviously not going to make the short list. That you are so desperate that you go with someone who won't agree to such terms is a sign that your business plan is doomed.
It's much easier to pay other people do the work and focus on developing a good product.
What good is it developing a good product if, by the time you get to market, you've already pissed off every possible consumer?