Slashdot Mirror


Another Hole in Hotmail

Ancipital noted that a new hotmail hole has sprung up. This one is, like the ILUVYOU bug, a VBS macro attachment that must be executed by people with very (ok, who does this, huh? I mean, viewing a gif or clicking a URL, but running a strange program? The mind boggles).

219 comments

  1. Re:You'd be surprised. by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

    Maybe they were overwhelmed by dialog boxes popping up and were just doing whatever it took to make the dern thing go away.

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
  2. Re:Wow by Reziac · · Score: 1

    About six months (mainly as a spamcatcher) and I quit using it when it became necessary to have javascript enabled to access my account. I have the nasty stuff turned off in Netscape.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  3. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by gaudior · · Score: 1
    Sure they can. In 1996, 34% of the American public voted for Bill Clinton... again.

    When you look at pop culture, and other countries leaders, it's obvious that most people are that stupid. I'm surprised the result wasn't higher.
    --

  4. Re:GUI designers take note by www · · Score: 1
    The attachment you are about to open may contain a virus. To continue opening, type "virus threat accepted", otherwise press return.

    On a very similar idea you could also have a form where there was the explanation, in which was said at the end to type "yes" or "no" into a text box and click okay. Perhaps something short but unique could be used for each different box. I think "virus threat accepted" is a little long, users might make a typo and not figure it out.

    E.G.
    You are about to format your disk. Formating your disk will erase all the information on it. Type "format" into the text box and click okay to format. Type "no" or click cancel to stop this operation. Remember, this formatting the disk will erase all information on it.
    ---------------
    | &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp &nbsp|
    ---------------
    &nbsp &nbsp [okay] &nbsp &nbsp [no]

    --
    -- no .sig here
  5. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by Error+Spelling · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't that be Monday OR Friday?

  6. Re:Wow by aradiaseven · · Score: 1
    Never used hotmail.

    For the online signup stuff, I have a pseudonym that has an e-mail alias on my own domain name that sends incoming mail to /dev/null

    Very convenient - I never even see the spam.

  7. Re:GUI designers take note by BlueMonk · · Score: 1
    Maybe it's time to be less GUI and force the users to think (FDISK does something similar):

    The attachment you are about to open may contain a virus. To continue opening, type "virus threat accepted", otherwise press return.
  8. Re:You'd be surprised. by steveargonman · · Score: 2

    Same kind of thing when you go to an AOL chatroom and tell them they can get your pic by pressing ALT+F4, it's been around forever, but the cluebies still fall for it. Idiots. :\

  9. Re:You'd be surprised. by PollMastah · · Score: 2

    Slashdot poll suggestion:

    In order to continue reading the pr0n trolls on Slashdot, you must pour a bowl of hot grits into your hard drive right now, and click OK. Do you wish to continue?

    1. Yes
    2. OK

    (Glossary: "hard drive" is usually used to denote the secondary storage device on your computer...)

    --

    Poll Mastah

  10. Re:Password in the cookie? No-one's *that* dumb :) by ksheff · · Score: 1

    I wonder what hotmail does if you check the "remember my password" option..

    It probably just sends you the same cookie but with an expires field, so the browser will store the cookie on the hard drive. If the cookie doesn't have an expires field, then it's kept only memory. If you need to login as a new user, restart the browser.

    Of course, if one is going to do something like this over the Internet, it should be encrypted. BTW, slashdot isn't the only one. Linuxtoday.com uses plaintext cookies for authentication also.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  11. message from hotmail by jbarnett · · Score: 2

    Message I got when deleting my spam bucket:

    Message to Hotmail Members

    We apologize, but your account is temporarily unavailable. This delay does not affect the entire site or relate specifically to your account, but the machine that holds your account information is temporarily unavailable. We do not expect this delay to last much longer, so please continue to check our site for your account status.
    We will do our best to make your account available as quickly as possible. We appreciate your support, and sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.

    © 2000 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Terms of Service Privacy Statement

    --

    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
  12. Password in the cookie? No-one's *that* dumb :) by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 2

    Naah, no-one would be stupid enough to embed a plaintext user password directly into an authentication cookie. Well, maybe Microsoft and Hotmail, but no-one who had the slightest clue about the issues Slashdotters care about.

    Would they?

    #!/usr/bin/perl -w

    open COOKIE, $ENV{HOME} . "/.netscape/cookies" or die;

    while (<COOKIE>) {
    if (/slashdot/) {
    chomp;
    my @args = split;
    my $cookie = pop @args;
    $cookie =~ s/\%25//g;
    print pack("H*", $cookie), "\n";
    }

    }

    --

    1. Re:Password in the cookie? No-one's *that* dumb :) by pod · · Score: 1
      I have done a web based email reader recently, and the unique cookie assigned can only be used by the ip address it was issued to. If some other ip tries to request a page with that cookie, it gets rejected. Such a trivial technique, works well too.

      Proxies of course make it look like everyone has the same ip, but this uses SSL which normally doesn't get proxied.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    2. Re:Password in the cookie? No-one's *that* dumb :) by jesser · · Score: 2
      Naah, no-one would be stupid enough to embed a plaintext user password directly into an authentication cookie.

      what's wrong with using the password for a permanent cookie? someone with the cookie can do anything you can do (post comments, submit articles), so why is it a big deal if they have your password?

      otoh, for something like web-based e-mail where you log in for a few minutes, you want the authentication gone when you leave the computer.

      (i wonder what hotmail does if you check the "remember my password" option..)

      --

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
  13. wingate by NuclearArchaeologist · · Score: 1
    If hotmail works on your machine, so will this.

    I once read that Wingate was full of holes. You might want to look into that.

  14. Re:The intelligence of a typical computer user by RobertAG · · Score: 1

    Actually, they were infected by the Intelligensia Virus, which causes dumb people to make what they believe to be intelligent, informed decisions..

  15. Re:GUI designers take note by clearcache · · Score: 1

    I hadn't thought about it quite like that. While dialog boxes in Windows are not limited to error messages, maybe they should be.

    ...and you're right, I run Gnome on my PC at home, and the only dialog box message that I get regularly (that I ignore) is the one that tells me I'm running the Gnome File Manager as root and that I could damage my system if I'm not careful.

  16. Is it only a Hotmail hole? by frankie · · Score: 1

    I don't use Hotmail. Does it automatically display HTML attachments?

    Using an HTML file to execute malicious javascript seems pretty straightforward. Are any of the other web-based email services (Yahoo, Eudoramail, Mac.com, etc) vulnerable to similar attacks?

    1. Re:Is it only a Hotmail hole? by sammy+baby · · Score: 2

      Not automatically: the items still have to be selected in order to be viewed. However, that's enough for the script to run and capture session data.

  17. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by Maxintern9 · · Score: 1

    If your mental age stayed in the single digits, I suppose it could approach a low number, since you IQ is your mental age divided by your physical age.

  18. Re:A Brief Explanation for the lazy by konstant · · Score: 2

    Try logging on to Hotmail, not touching anything for 30 mins and then clicking on 'read mail'. If they have the server set up sensibly, you'll have to enter your user name and password again.

    On the other hand, if Microsoft have done something really really dumb, like including the password in a cookie, then there's really no hoe for them.


    Hotmail stores your user information in a session cookie, not a persistent (disk) cookie. If you close all your browser windows and access hotmail again, you are required to enter your password again... unlike Slashdot I might note.

    I know the session cookie has an expiration period, but I don't remember what it is. Probably something like 20 minutes.

    -konstant
    Yes! We are all individuals! I'm not!

    --
    -konstant
    Yes! We are all individuals! I'm not!
  19. Re:JavaScript, not VBS... by Spoing · · Score: 1

    HTML and RTF allow us to format email far more effectively than plain text ever will. Shouldn't we just make them more secure?

    You use RTF for email? HTML -- if stripped down to the most basic tags -- I can understand, but why RTF?

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  20. Hotmail did. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5

    I thought this story was quite. Besides being, it was to read! I wonder why Microsoft can't get off, and implement.

    This is not, the JavaScript exploit in existence! Microsoft should, otherwise the users. The mind boggles.

    But then again, I rarely. So who. Well!

    1. Re:Hotmail did. by RPoet · · Score: 1

      Oh my god.. I think I need to get some sleep...
      --

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    2. Re:Hotmail did. by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 1

      So why is CmdrTaco posting anonymously now?

      --
      Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  21. Re:Wow by gwalla · · Score: 1

    I got a Hotmail account years ago (my first email account, and before MS bought Hotmail). I still have it, although I don't use it that often. I really only use it as an alternate account during the summer, since my school account won't let me log in from a different server, and because several of my friends keep sending me stuff at that address even though I keep giving them the new one.

    ---
    Zardoz has spoken!

    --
    Oper on the Nightstar
  22. Re:You'd be surprised. by (void*) · · Score: 2
    And the other 2/3 - 1 persons clicked no? Only one remembered not to run that executable?

    Right?

  23. difference between data and executable by jpowers · · Score: 1
    "ok, who does this, huh? I mean, viewing a gif or clicking a URL, but running a strange program?"

    Not everyone knows the difference. They see the attachment and click. After the last one, I sent an explanation of how to figure out what kind of file the attachment is (by looking at the extension) and why it's important to know before you click on it.
    Since I support a hundred-plus windows users, I'm not really surprised that people don't know this. I'm sort of irritated, though, that if I don't tell them stuff like this, they aren't going to learn it anywhere else. The programs don't have little warning screens about it, and no one will ever RTFM, so they're stuck. Good thing we don't use Outlook here, eh? We still got last week's virus, but only two people lost .jpgs over it.

    -jpowers
    You Know You've Been Watching Too Much Ranma 1/2 When...
    --

    -jpowers
  24. One word: ActiveX by gwalla · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that it would be fairly trivial to embed an ActiveX component in an HTML email, to mess with people who read their mail with ActiveX-enabled software (Hotmail via MSIE, Outlook, etc.). Since ActiveX is just plain-vanilla binary executables with the most minimal security imaginable, it could do all sorts of unpleasant things when viewed. It could, for example: propagate itself (by interfacing with Outlook), embed itself into every HTML file on the user's hard drive, embed itself into all outgoing HTML mail (in which case it could become nearly uncatchable), send all sorts of info over the net, install backdoors, etc. I'm surprised it hasn't been done already.


    ---
    Zardoz has spoken!
    --
    Oper on the Nightstar
  25. Poor users that would clik this. by Mr+Krinkle · · Score: 1

    It is not a matter of educating people. We will never be able to educate everyone enough. People will always be stupid. Even if you are the smartest person, you still do remarkably stupid things. I have yet to meet the person that can not qucikly think of at least 5 times they did things that any rational person would comment as completely stupid. As for people cliking in an email for most users a computer is as much of a magic creation as the internal combustion engine. How many drivers know exactly how their car works and can repair it? These computer users are the same ones that repeatedly send forwards on because if they send it to 200,000 people Timmy will receive millions in health care and they will see a cool qt movie on their pc. People do stupid things. We will continue to do stupid things. Therefore education helps but people will always clik a button if the pros seem to outweigh the posssible negatives. Or even if it is jut in front of them. just my one cent.

    --
    I am 31337 or something.
  26. Re:Listen, folks by malachai · · Score: 1

    you see, this is the problem with the world today. everyone is so concerned with the format and correctness of everything, not of what it is trying to tell you. it doesnt matter one bit if his grammar is wrong, if he spells something wrong, etc, its just being anal about something so completely insignifigant that brings nothing but stress to everyone. get over it, it not going t affect your life if someone talks differently then you do, and if it does, your life must not be worth that much.

    point in case, my lack of capitals and most punctuation, i hope it gives you nightmares.

    -Malachai
    -Sometimes i want to masturbate but then i feel that i dont deserve myself.

  27. Re:The intelligence of a typical computer user by Lev_Arris · · Score: 1

    We've had the same here in Luxembourg where a local radio station reported that ILOVEYOU had destroyed millions of computers (Did their CPU explode?) but completely forgot to mention that one could just delete the mail without launching the attachment and that's it.

    They also said that there were no Antivirus tools available that could detect VBS.LoveLetter which was just plain wrong, as I had downloaded updates for InnocuLAN, McAfee, Norton AV and AVP about 2 hours before their report.

  28. Re:Hooray for Javascript by radish · · Score: 1


    Hmm - a tip. When looking for karma, try getting your facts right. As anyone who reads /. should know, you can't put anything programmatic in a cookie (and that includes jscript).

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  29. Re:you missed the point by thimo · · Score: 3

    The point was that people don't read the dialog.

    Yes, but the point was that users *might* think that formatting the HD is a good thing. Sometimes it is, when you detect Windows on it, to install OS blablabla ;), but normally it is not what you want. The point of the poster you replied to was that the user doesn't need to know that formatting is bad and thus you don't know for sure 1 out of 3 users don't read dialog boxes.

    Thimo
    --

    --
    Avoid the Gates of Hell. Use Linux!
  30. Another point... by MonkeyMagic · · Score: 1

    ... is that most users don't know that other extensions than .exe can actually run "a programme". So even if they did see .js or .vbs they wouldn't even know not to run it. For most users, the only way to find out what type a file is, is to double-click.

  31. Re:question about the above statement by cameloid · · Score: 1

    I think he was about to say "with very small cranial cavities", but I could be wrong.

    --
    -- Cisk for the Cisk God
  32. Re:Formatting the same as erasing? by mikpos · · Score: 1

    Err actually both are not necessarily true. It is not difficult to find a situation where (a) the engine speed will decrease or remain constant; and (b) the speed of the car will decrease or remain constant when you floor the gas pedal (e.g. while going up a steep hill with a small engine or heavy load).

    The name "accelerator" is a bit confusing because it implies that it will cause your car to accelerate. More often than not, it's used to keep your car at a constant speed, and oftentimes it will be used to slow the car down. Most people wisely don't call it an "accelerator".

    Rather, most people call it a "gas pedal" and likewise use phrases like "giving it some gas" and "laying off the gas". This to me shows that they have a very good understanding of what the pedal does: it allows more gasoline into the fuel mixture. Also, it would seem that most people will not expect the gas pedal to cause any sort of positive acceleration when going up a steep hill (for example), so I'd say your assumption that most people just expect it to speed up the car is false. Also, your assumption that it doesn't matter would also seem to be false, otherwise extreme confusion would ensue when people would drive in hilly or mountainous parts.

    This may seem off-topic, but it's not. Would it be too much to ask to give the populous at large the benefit of the doubt? Most people know what's going on with most things, and they don't need it to be overly dumbed down. The worst case of this is retarded software companies who make programs that mimic real-life devices in order to presumably make it "easier to use" (examples are CD players which look like real CD players, chat programs which look like telephones, e-mail programs which make analogies to snail mail protocols). Oftentimes, the program will be come out extremely crippled, and pretty much inferior in every way to its competitors. Also, it come out being a little bit condescending, which I'm sure can't help its sales. People know that an increase in gas in the fuel mixture in their car causes an increase in power because they've experienced it, not because there's a sticker that says "speed" or any such nonsense pasted on to it.

  33. Re:A Brief Explanation for the lazy by VoiceOfReason · · Score: 1

    Just the addition of an IP address encoded as part of the session key will block out *most* of the people who could grab your cookie for this hack. The only ones it doesn't affect are those with the same IP address as the unsuspecting Hotmail user, which would occur if the Hotmail user was behind the same proxy as the perpetrator. Its an easy change to make, since they are (assumedly) already going back to verify the session key in some respect.

  34. Re:A Brief Explanation for the lazy by AppyPappy · · Score: 1

    Write a Javascript embedded in an HTML that automatically sends the reader to another website. How much damage can you do to a person's PC once they get to a website? Especially with Java or VB/JavaScript?

    The problem would be that it wouldn't take long for the site to get shuttered and the manhunt would be on. Perhaps.

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  35. Re:GUI designers take note by ianezz · · Score: 1
    People don't want to face decisions.

    Unfortunately, software requires you to make decisions, and dumbly clicking on "OK" all the time is seen just as a quick way to make the problem go away. Unfortunately, it's not the case. Ideally, the user interface of an application should be engineered and designed to stay flexible intuitive, easy to learn while popping up the minimum number of questions. These goals cannot be accomplished all the times for every situation. In such cases, where the full attention of the user is needed, I'd suggest to force him to use a different input device in order to proceed than the one he usually uses. Today it would mean that you'd have to require confirmation via keyboard (perhaps requiring to type an extensive `yes' instead of a simple `y' (or whatever). I know this may be source of troubles, but I don't see alternatives if questions can't be avoided.

  36. Sorry, it's gone. by TheDullBlade · · Score: 2

    I developed it on paid time, it was company property. I didn't keep a copy (I don't use Windows at home for anything but games, so I wasn't tempted).

    I was pretty sure it would spread to millions of computers, and I'd get a bonus. Instead I got a pat on the back from the guy in the next cubicle (who didn't install the software either), and the company refused to hire me as a regular employee when my co-op term ended (despite demonstrated ability as one of their best programmers, and their desperate need for a rewrite of an in-house package I was intimately familiar with, I was "unqualified" without a degree). Very disappointing.

    --
    /.
  37. Just another reason not to use Hotmail by Narmi · · Score: 1

    I also don't use Lookout Express.

    1. Re:Just another reason not to use Hotmail by malachai · · Score: 1

      yeah, i thought using that feature in hotmail was cool but after using it for a while i became frightened :D

    2. Re:Just another reason not to use Hotmail by RobertAG · · Score: 1

      But if you use Hotmail with Netscape and Linux (like me), a little 'ole VB Script ain't gonna do much.

    3. Re:Just another reason not to use Hotmail by TITAN-X · · Score: 1

      How many users know to turn off JAVASCRIPT before viewing an attachment -- If you need a secure email account, try LINUX or other TEXT-BASED programs

      --
      DEVO-X
    4. Re:Just another reason not to use Hotmail by gaudior · · Score: 1

      It's not VB script, it JavaScript. Do you have JS turned off?
      --

    5. Re:Just another reason not to use Hotmail by roundclock · · Score: 1

      Me too! Thanks for thanking him, that thanked him.
      Thanks to thanks again!

  38. Re:GUI designers take note by Delphis · · Score: 1

    Yea.. it sure does! Also provokes a swearing response and a tendency to scream if something important is being worked on .. well, it does from me as it's FAR too frequent with my machine running Nice Try SP6 .. i.e. it actually happens. Only time I saw Linux kernel panic was when I had a machine with a dodgy simm socket and half the machine's memory just 'disappeared'.. kinda understanding it would get upset..

    Anyway.. I digress.

    --

    --
    Delphis
  39. Re:A Brief Explanation for the lazy by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 1
    How does it make you feel when so many here blame Microsoft Outlook for the ILOVEYOU virus. The prevailing attitude is "Microsoft should have protected users of Outlook. Instead of calling it Outlook, better call it Lookout", etc.

    What they are really suggesting is that Microsoft should bundle anti-virus software with Windows and Outlook. Seems to me that the bundling issue got you guys into a bunch of trouble already.

    You can't have it both ways folks. If you are going to split Microsoft in two for bundling software, you can't demand that they bundle more software to protect from virii.

    Ugh. Expecting anything but bigoted bullshit about Microsoft from /. is asking too much, it seems.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  40. Re:A Brief Explanation for the lazy by kootch · · Score: 2

    the tricky part about this is that you don't need to click on the attachment. Hotmail, just like many of the other newer email clients, recognizes it as html code, and embeds the html page into the page automatically. Unless you've changed settings, this will happen without you actually doing anything.

    it's not a vbs file. it's an embeded javascript. there is no virus check run because it's not a virus and there isn't an anti-virus that checks for potentially malignant javascript. Hell, the creator only had to identify the cookie, the username, and the server the cookie was being held on, and automatically send all of this info to another account (which could have been a hotmail account)

    Not everyone had to actually open the attachment.

  41. Idiots who run shit by Steevee · · Score: 1

    No lie, I work on a college campus with PhD's who will open anything...we had several people run the ILOVEYOU .exe without even thinking twice about and then they piss and moan when I tell them it will be a day or two before I can find the time to come out and rebuild their machines.

    ID10T's....all of 'em.

    --
    if electricity is created by electrons, is morality created by morons?
  42. Yahoo mail by MrShiny · · Score: 1


    I tried this thing on my Yahoo mail account and it changed the <script> tag to <cursive> :)

  43. Kudos to Hotmail!!! by Remote · · Score: 1

    OK, so bashing hotmail.com in /. is pretty easy, but there is one single aspect that I think makes hotmail the best free web-based e-mail service: they do close spam generating accounts or drop-in box accounts. You guys in this thread seem not to pay much attention to this.

    I used to receive about 5 spam messages a day and never have I sent a complaint with a full header to abuse@hotmail.com I got spam from the same address again. I can't say the same about any other web-mail.


  44. How stupid are people by glitch_ · · Score: 1

    Many people don't understand the ramifications of actions online. Just like long ago on AOL, even though the was a warning label on everything, people still gave away thier Screen names and passwords.

    1. Re:How stupid are people by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      I don't think this applies to this case, unless consider them stupid for using HotMail in the first place.

      The exploit involves clicking on an HTML attachment. If we stop considering HTML as safe the whole web would crumble.

      I don't know that I would blaim MS so much either in that HTML and JavaScript are reasonably safe it is just this particular combination of running a javascript that appears to be from hotmail itself, and therefor can access Hotmail cookies. As sugested elsewhere, MS should change the aparent origin of attached email files to be another domain, like test.com.

    2. Re:How stupid are people by Misch · · Score: 1

      I say GOOD! As one of my cow orkers said, "Anybody who writes someting that shows just how bad Microsofts programs are and how stupid people are deserves a statue, not jail time."

      I think a quote from spaceballs is appropriate:
      Helmet: So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
  45. Lowest common denominator by AliasTheRoot · · Score: 1

    If you insist on designing software services so easy that an idiot can use them, then expect idiots to use them. Now couple this with a need to "innovate", ie force out upgrades to software with features that people don't need then what do you expect?

    1. Re:Lowest common denominator by dragonfly_blue · · Score: 2
      And let that be a lesson to everyone; you're just not being malicious enough!

      You punk kid virus writers are becoming lazy no-goodniks who just want to live off the government dole! Back when I was a kid, we had to walk 7 miles through unsorted punchcards if we wanted to write a virus; and we didn't have no fancy-schmancy new-fangled "scripting languages", neither, nosirree, we had to imprint the binary on cardboard boxes, which in turn we'd mamble famble until they'd turn into finely crafted executables, yes sirree.

      --
      Free music from Jack Merlot.
    2. Re:Lowest common denominator by dragonfly_blue · · Score: 1
      Sorry bout that, haven't had my coffee yet. Also, wanted to test the new servers. =P

      --
      Free music from Jack Merlot.
    3. Re:Lowest common denominator by cvd6262 · · Score: 1
      It's sad that Gates is still spewing smoke about M$ needing to be in one piece to prevent this sort of thing. I write JavaScript everyday and could have done this if I had thought about it (maybe I'm not malicious enough).

      What's even more sad is that he keeps doing it because he knows people believe him, and click things that erase their HD.

      jt

      --

      I'd rather have someone respond than be modded up.

    4. Re:Lowest common denominator by tburkhol · · Score: 1

      I'm still amazed how many users I see double-click on _everything_ regardless of what they really want to do. I wonder how many people executed ILOVEYOU.TXT.vbs when they meant to select&delete.

  46. question about the above statement by dayeight · · Score: 2

    What kind of grammer is that?

    With very what?! Egads.

    Linux Band Bratwurst Orange
    Beos Band XIR: Xir is recursive

    1. Re:question about the above statement by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 5
      It's not the grammar that bothers me, so much as the inaccuracy of the summary. It isn't a VBS attachment that causes the problem, but rather a plain HTML attachment with embedded javascript. Even in a world of "intelligent" users, HTML is expected to be a "safer" document format, rather than "dangerous" executable code.

      I think there're a number of people you could assign the blame to, but no one entity that's "fully stupid". Users should be more careful, Hotmail should attempt some filtering, but most importantly the w3c should provide a means of denoting "third-party" HTML (and other documents) that appears to be from the server, but in reality was placed there by someone else (such as an attachment to an email or a comment in a message board that doesn't restrict HTML).

    2. Re:question about the above statement by kupolu · · Score: 1
      Part of the post got cut off. He was referring to the ILOVEYOU virus when he said the VBS script. I have no idea why he added that, but if he was calling the hotmail hole a VBS script, he would of said "is a VB macro" instead of "a VB macro".

      You know it must be slashdot if we have to spend time deciphering CmdrTaco's grammer instead of looking at the point of the post:)

      --
      -- We should kill all the intolerant people in the world.
  47. Re:File extensions by fulgan · · Score: 1

    Except that all news client I know displays the extention anyway so you'll have to save the file and open the folder you saved it to in order to have the extention hidden

    Not exactly the same, is it ?

  48. Re:JavaScript, not VBS... by gaudior · · Score: 1
    ObBias: Email shouldn't be in HTML, let alone have embeded scipts...strip it all folks!

    Not a bias, just good common sense.


    --

  49. it's not a microsoft bug per se... by SethJohnson · · Score: 3


    This is an embedded javascript exploit, just like some of the earlier exploits (not VBS as described above by CT). Hotmail is filtering out javascript within the bodies of e-mail, but not attached html files. They could remedy this by either filtering attached html files (not so easy to do) or by offloading the attachments to be read from a seperate server outside the *.hotmail.com domain (my recommendation).

    Here's an awesome story about another risk of using web-based e-mail. It describes how your IP address could be identified if the sender attaches an IMG tag to the e-mail and then watches the web server log for when you read the mail and your browser requests the image from her server. Clever.



    Seth
    1. Re:it's not a microsoft bug per se... by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 1

      There's also a CERT advisory a few months back about a similar problem: Malicious HTML Tags Embedded in Client Web Requests

  50. Re:You'd be surprised. by zpengo · · Score: 2
    I used to do that with Netbus. People would be looking at porn sites or something, and I'd pop up a dialog that said "In order to continue, your hard drive must first be properly reformatted. Do you wish to continue?"

    I was nothing short of amazed at how many people clicked OK. It must have been at least a third, if not half.

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  51. Read more abt it by Nate+Fox · · Score: 2
    theres a Wired article and a ZDNet article.

    From the ZDNet article:
    Bennett Haselton, Webmaster for Peacefire.org, said the flaw involves sending a user an e-mail with an HTML attachment. When the user clicks on the attachment, the file sends a copy of the user?s cookie to the hacker.
    Once that cookie is received, the hacker can insert it manually into the Netscape cookies.txt file and use that authentication key to log in to Hotmail as the user. Click here for a description of the trick.
    <snip>
    Not a 'trivial bug'
    Since the cookie does not contain the user's password, the hacker can only access the account when the user is logged on and as long as the authentication code is valid. But Haselton said that five minutes would be long enough for a hacker with a prepared script to download all of a user's e-mail messages.

    Best I could see, theres no email floating around doing this - its just an idea at this point. And for it to propagate(sp?) like luvbug or melissa, it'd need a script to use the hotmail address book. As it sits right now, it'd just come from one guy who knew lots of hotmail addresses. Someone correct me if I'm wrong on this, tho :)

    -----
    If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed...

  52. Re:Formatting the same as erasing? by ganjuror · · Score: 1

    "I'm sure the manual will indicate which lever is the velocitator, and which the decelleratrix..."
    - C. M. Burns

  53. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by MrDelSarto · · Score: 1

    clearly that is not true. 35% of all statistics are just made up anyway

  54. Re:Formatting the same as erasing? by Cris+E · · Score: 1
    As for whether 'formatting' is the best word for this operation - well, there is no word in the English language that means whatever it is you are doing to the disk, so either a new word had to be coined - or an old word recycled. I can't think of a better word than 'formatting'.

    Initialize works well...

    Cris E
    St. Paul, MN

  55. Re:The intelligence of a typical computer user by Gregg+M · · Score: 2

    What I saw made me laugh over and over again. The news people on almost every channel gave the following advice.

    1.) If you get an e-mail that your not expecting (hmmm all of them!) call the person and ask them if they sent you mail.
    Why don't you just drive over to their house and ask them.... DUH!

    2.) Make sure you virus software is up to date.
    Hello! This didn't work and wouldn't work because this was a NEW virus. They had a virus defintion only hours after the bug hit! What good would it have done!

    --
    Linux is only free if your time has no value. Windows is only free if you threaten to use Linux.
  56. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by fedos · · Score: 1

    Or customer service.

  57. Slashdot is apparently immune by bcilfone · · Score: 1
    Wow, I just tried to setup an example in my post that popped up the user's cookie in an alert window, but apparently the slashdot folks figured out a semi decent way to filter out javascript.

    Good job!

  58. Re:The basic problem is... by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should read up on the facts. She was the passenger in a car... the driver pulled over so she could add stuff to her coffee, she took off the lid and it spilled on her. The issue was that the coffee is way hotter than it should have been, but she still should have been more careful.

    -- Dr. Eldarion --
    It's not what it is, it's something else.

  59. Re:Wow by Nick_Psyko · · Score: 1

    Today I downloaded all the headers from my snotmail account. 1210 new massages! arrgh. . . .

    --
    mountvol \\?\brain{dbe069b1-65ae-11d5-bab4-806d6172696f}\hu mor\
  60. Re:No, not a hole in Hotmail. by kwsNI · · Score: 1

    You're right, it is the MAIL servers job to send/receive e-mail. However, with web based e-mail, the WEB server basically has to act as your e-mail client. If that was left up to the browser, the browser would have to be written to work with ever online mail service AND each time the inevitable hole is found, you'd have to download a new browser.

    kwsNI

  61. Not only that... by The+Queen · · Score: 1

    ...but what about folks who defrag their hard drive every time they get a javascript run error.

    I'm on the fence between ease of use and mandatory education. (Mostly cuz I drive a car but couldn't tell you how it works...pot calling the kettle, eh?)

    The Divine Creatrix in a Mortal Shell that stays Crunchy in Milk

    --

    The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
  62. Re:You'd be surprised. by imeof · · Score: 1

    that is alot of dialog boxes

  63. I know it now. by NuclearArchaeologist · · Score: 1
    Interesting sophistry. I suppose you would agree that the user does not need all of the pointless and uninformative messages as well as important ones? A user that does not know what formating is, has had a big M$ flag pulled over their eyes. The conditioning runs deeper than message boxes.

    Having worked in an all M$ shop for the last three weeks, I can tell you that you are right. Many of the users do not know what formating is. I can also tell you that most will click or run just about anything! 1 of 3 is a low ball estimate for where I work. Those people and myself generally read no further than OK. Woops, it blew up, so what? Application reliability is terrible to begin with and most people have just given up. Their powerlessness has been demonstrated again and again as reasonable applications were replaced with MS counterparts. With their power to choose went all feelings of responsibility. They have given up.

  64. Re:Wow by thopkins · · Score: 1

    Uh they can't be true. Hotmail accounts are deleted after 3 months (or is it 4?) of non use.

  65. Re:Listen, folks by quadong · · Score: 2

    Ok, while I disagree with your point in general, I will concede that it is the meaning of a sentance that makes the most difference. However, a trailing adjective/adverb that modifies nothing is a problem anyone can be justified complaining about. This is why it bothers us when we see stories that have sentances that just

  66. Re:GUI designers take note by yson · · Score: 1

    I know. Switch to full screen mode with blue background and display your wanring in white text. That never fails to provoke knee-jerk reaction.

  67. Not just Hotmail? by mkrus · · Score: 1

    isn't this related to the Trojan Horse Issue that the ZOPE guys posted yesterday?

  68. Do NOT hit yourself in the head with this hammer. by kd5biv · · Score: 2
    Then, when the ILOVEYOU crap started, I had to send 2 separate emails with all caps in the body and a header that read "READ THIS!!" or something to get their attention. In it I said not to open attachments. Several people stopped me to ask; "Is it okay to open attachments?"
    I've always wanted to leave a claw hammer on my desk with a note attached that says:
    This is a hammer. Please do not hit yourself in the head with it. Hitting yourself in the head with this hammer will cause serious and permanent brain damage.
    That way I have something to point to when someone asks me if it's OK to open email attachments. Doesn't work too well over the phone, but I'm sure I could make use of a suitable GIF on the web server..
    --


    73 de N5VB (ex-KD5BIV) AR SK
  69. Re:Listen, folks by VoiceOfReason · · Score: 1

    Thats an easy opinion to take when you're young, but when you have to join the real world and effectively communicate with those around you it just doesn't cut it. If you can't get your point across in an acceptable dialect, people will ignore you or make fun of you. While you may think that's wrong, proper spelling and grammar (which I do not claim to always follow to the letter) are two areas of conformance I agree with.

    If you don't think it matters, watch how many people comment when CmdrTaco or one of the others uses atrocious spelling and/or grammar. While it may be acceptable in certain communities (such as this one, to a degree), try turning in a paper to a professor or a design document to your boss and see how far it flies.

  70. Re:No, not a hole in Hotmail. by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1

    I disagree it doesn't have to act as a client. It presents the data to the browser who is the acting client. I guess if you want to get wild about it, it could be a client as much as pop3 is a client; their job is to get data to and fro not inspect and decide what you get. (maybe I'm just and old crusty bastard but that's the original intention of mail and I'm sticking to it).

    The problem with your suggestion is that not only do these exploits work for Hotmail, because the client readily accepts them, any other site can send bad javascript to you. If the client would prevent you from executing bad code to begin with there could be 20 billion new exploits but if your browser didn't run them not only would your Hotmail account be fine but all the other sites one goes to doesn't have to be worried about either.

  71. is it surprising? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Folks at MS should have known better than leaving attachments unprotected like that. They should compile attached html files into word documents or something :)

    Listen, this is not really a new bug, this has being there for a while. A couple of month ago I used JavaScript and my school account to collect some passwords from some unsuspecting users of HotMail. It was very easy. The attached HTML had JS that reloaded the parent page not from HotMail but from my own server. (I just copied the entire page) most people did not notice that the URL does not belong to MS, they decided that Hotmail threw them out and they tried to relogin. A script on my server read the password and the user name, then sent back a page with the password and username and 'onload' submitted that info to the MS servers (this way the user actually logged into their hotmail accounts but I still had their passwords). The trick was to control the parent window, for some reason the exploit only worked in Netscape 4.x not in IE.
    Well, there is always next time.

  72. Robin Miller not doing his job... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A373 62-2000May9.html

    C'mon 'boys'....

    Wonder if there is a contract with Katz involved....

    --
    Blar.
  73. Security Hole Discovered At Slashdot! by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 3

    Here's the exploit:

    1) Find a story about technology (if your name is "Katz" this step is unneeded)
    2) Skim the headline of said story to "get the gist".
    3) Submit story to Slashdot, paying special attention to making it seem like this story is related to some hot topic.

    For instance, if the story is about a misconfigured website allowing a security breach, make it seem like the story is related to a recent email worm by working "email" and "Visual Basic Scripting" in there somehow.

    What's the effect of this exploit: In all the excitement of having another Microsoft bashing story will hurriedly type your submission onto the front page with plenty of spelling errors and word omissions.
    --
    Have Exchange users? Want to run Linux? Can't afford OpenMail?

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  74. Re:Wow by WD · · Score: 1

    I use mine only to sign up for anything online.
    Basically, all it ends up being is an online junk mail repository! (which I rarely ever bother to check)

    -WD

  75. A Brief Explanation for the lazy by CiaranMc · · Score: 5

    How this seems to work is that someone emails you an HTML file as an attachment.

    If you then view the attachment through Hotmail, Javascript in that attachment can then pretend to me from the Hotmail domain, and therefore access any cookies that Hotmail has set up. It can then submit these values to a form on another, hostile, server.

    These cookies then allow access to the site from a user pretending to be you, allowing them to read and delete your emails or send email from your account.

    It's not clear form the article, but presumably the relevant cookie is the one holding the user's session key. In a typical implementation this key will be useless after 30mins or so, but the length of the timeout is really whatever Microsoft chooses it to be.

    Try logging on to Hotmail, not touching anything for 30 mins and then clicking on 'read mail'. If they have the server set up sensibly, you'll have to enter your user name and password again.

    On the other hand, if Microsoft have done something really really dumb, like including the password in a cookie, then there's really no hoe for them.

    -Ciaran

    1. Re:A Brief Explanation for the lazy by greenrd · · Score: 1
      What they are really suggesting is that Microsoft should bundle anti-virus software with Windows and Outlook.

      That would be a good idea, yes. If it worked properly and had quick, regular, free updates, an excellent idea.

      But that's completely missing the point. Microsoft should never have released a product with such hideous security bugs still in it.

      You can't have it both ways folks. If you are going to split Microsoft in two for bundling software

      Personally I don't try to. The "bundling" issue is a load of hot air to me. What on earth is wrong with giving stuff away, as long as you don't exclude other people's stuff illegally? But remember the anti-trust trial does not stand or fall on bundling alone.

  76. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by barooo · · Score: 1

    Think of how dumb the average person is. By definition, half of the population is dumber than that...

    Technically, wouldn't that be the median?

    --
    One more drink, and I'll move on. --Dave Matthews Band
  77. I can't resist...someone has to say it. by hal200 · · Score: 4
    C is for cookie, that's good enough for me!

    Ah. I feel MUCH better now! Now I have to go delete some email before I lose my cookies! <grin>

    --

    I just want to take over the world...Why does that automatically make me EVIL?

  78. Clickwrap Licenses by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the problems one might to ensure that a "clickwrap license" is read and agreed to by the consumer. The traditional method of ensuring that the agreement is actually read is to disable the OK button until the user has scrolled through the license. But how can you ensuretaht a reader actually reads what's scrolling past? I propose a multiple choice reading comprehension exam.

  79. this mail is not hot by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Request to rename Hotmail into Holemail (other variations such as Crackmail are accepted)

  80. Hotmail is down by heinzkeinz · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this hole explains why Hotmail is down.
    Could they actually be fixing the problem? Naaah.

    Here's the message one gets on login:

    "We apologize, but your account is temporarily unavailable. This delay does not affect the entire site or relate specifically to your account, but the machine that holds your account information is temporarily unavailable. We do not expect this delay to last much longer, so please continue to check our site for your account status.

    We will do our best to make your account available as quickly as possible. We appreciate your support, and sincerely apologize for the inconvenience."

  81. Who does this? by seligman · · Score: 1
    ok, who does this, huh? I mean, viewing a gif or clicking a URL, but running a strange program? The mind boggles

    I run outlook in a largish corporation. If you want, I can give you a list of a few hundred people that click on strange attachments.

    :)

    --
    -- It is too late for the pebbles to vote, the avalanche has already started.
  82. Does anyone really consider internet email secure? by L-Train8 · · Score: 1

    There have been enough well-publicized problems with internet email that everyone with a brain knows they are not secure. Doesn't everyone just use thier hotmail accounts to enter on website forms, so they don't get spammed so much?

    Saying "hotmail has security holes" is like saying the sky is blue.

    --

    Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
  83. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by Tava · · Score: 1

    They still bias the average over the median. It might not be much, but still...

    Think of a population of 3, two have intelligence value of 1 (any metric) and one has value 1.5. Now the average is 1.166666 and 66% is below that! Not by much, but it is below! What I am styatin is that the two tails are not symmetric and the net result is a median (slightly) lower than the average. Thus we have that more than 50% of the population is below average! Not by much, but below.

  84. Why!? by Mr804 · · Score: 1


    uh. Why do people even use hotmail? Last I checked, everyone and their grandma has some free email service.. mail.yahoo.com, excite, etc.

  85. Re:Wow by greenrd · · Score: 1
    I log in once every 6 months or so to delete everything.

    Um....? Why log in at all?

  86. hmmm.... by Byteme · · Score: 1
    Hotmail is down at the moment. :)

  87. Re:Hotmail is the most spam free service I know of by greenrd · · Score: 1
    I don't use the Hotmail spam protection because I am paranoid about losing interesting/important email (I am on a ton of low-volume mailing lists). Instead I use the subject-line filters (primitive but it works). The chances of a legitimate email having HOT XXX ACTION in the subject line are virtually nil. :-)

  88. Re:JavaScript, not VBS... by AdamJ · · Score: 1

    And the flipside to this:

    Why do we need more than plain text for email?

    I like email to appear in the standard fonts and layout *I* want, not what somebody on the other end of the line thinks is cool. I don't want to waste the time downloading the extra bloat for HTML. I don't want this bloat replicated to the hundreds of people that subscribe to the mailing lists I run. I don't want the PINE users who subscribe to the lists bitching endlessly at me because they're getting HTML attachements.

    Comformity to standards brings efficiency.

    If something needs formatting, that's what attachments are for.

    Adam

  89. Re:Social Engineering is easier by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

    Anyone who falls for something like that DESERVES to face the consequences...

    if they didn't learn all the times that the services say "DON'T GIVE YOUR PASSWORD OUT TO ANYONE", then maybe that will teach them a lesson.

    -- Dr. Eldarion --
    It's not what it is, it's something else.

  90. Formatting the same as erasing? by LordNimon · · Score: 5
    Your post underscores the fact that many technical people have forgotton the original meaning of the words they use. It's really a shame.

    To you and me, formatting means erasing. But that's only true in techno-speak. In every other context, the word "format" does not imply erasing - not at all! And since very few people actually format their hard drives (and hence, have no experience with the process), how can you expect them to know what that word means?

    When you "format" something, you arrange it. You put it into some kind of order. To most people, that's a good thing! The moron who decided that "format" is a synonym for "erase" should be shot.

    If your application had asked the user to "erase all files on your hard drive", I think very few people would have said yes.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:Formatting the same as erasing? by VChris · · Score: 1

      Actually, 'format' is not a bad term for what it was intended to do. Format puts the initial information on a disk defining inodes, directory structure, freeblock bitmaps, etc etc - in other words, giving the disk structure so that it is useable. The bad part of the term is that it doesn't imply the loss of data...

      --


      The difference between reality and fantasy is a nice soundtrack.
    2. Re:Formatting the same as erasing? by sbaker · · Score: 1
      Back when floppy disks were 8 inches across, I wrote a little CP/M-like OS for our Intellec MDS. While writing the disk formatter, I'd be testing it a dozen times a day and got *fatally* used to typing 'Y' when it asked if I *really* wanted to do it. To prevent myself from making that mistake again, when asking whether you wanted to format the disk or not, it would say:

      "If you wish to reformat this disk, please tell me the Capital of Paraguay:"

      ...or any of a dozen other capital cities of hard-to-remember places.

      :-)

      Oh - and BTW - there is a BIG difference between formatting and erasing. Erasing is a merely a side-effect of re-formatting.

      Erasing is not a side-effect of first time formatting because an unformatted disk (by definition) contains no files.

      Also, you can certainly erase all the files on a disk and not have reformatted it.

      As for whether 'formatting' is the best word for this operation - well, there is no word in the English language that means whatever it is you are doing to the disk, so either a new word had to be coined - or an old word recycled. I can't think of a better word than 'formatting'.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
    3. Re:Formatting the same as erasing? by LordNimon · · Score: 2
      Actually, 'format' is not a bad term for what it was intended to do.

      But that's beside the point. The fact that it re-initializes the directory structure and allocation tables is nowhere near as big of an issue as the fact that it erases all data on the drive!!!!

      Here's an analogy:

      Stepping on the accelerator in a car will:

      • A) increase the RPM of the engine
      • B) make the car go faster
      Yes, both are true, but so what? When a driver steps on the accelerator, it's because he wants B) the car to go faster. 99% of all drivers aren't that concerned about the engine RPM, even if they know what it is.
      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    4. Re:Formatting the same as erasing? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 3

      But that's beside the point. The fact that it re-initializes the directory structure and allocation tables is nowhere near as big of an issue as the fact that it erases all data on the drive!!!!

      Usually it doesn't actually. The data is still there but inaccessable because the OS just reset the allocation tables. You're not really losing the data, you're losing the ability to access the data in the intended mannor, its a byproduct.

      Dos even had an "unformat" command.

      -- iCEBaLM

    5. Re:Formatting the same as erasing? by BlueMonk · · Score: 2

      I think a more fun experiment would be to write a program that asks "This program contains a virus. In order to run this program you must first install the virus onto your computer. A computer virus has the potential to destroy all data contained on the system. Yes, that means you should click cancel if you want to live. [OK] [Cancel]"

  91. economy of incompetence by scotch · · Score: 1
    At this point, if Microsoft were to clean up its act with regard to virus vulnerability and security, remove all holes from its sponge-like operating systems, and patch each leaky application, the army of companies in the business of providing bandaids for Microsoft's lesions would suddenly find themselfves without a market or hope for a profit. Virus protection, installation, un-installtion, disk doctoring, system tweeking, and countless other markets swarm like remoras around the whale-shark that is Microsoft. Sudden cluefulness on the part of our Redmond friends would at this point surely result in lawsuits from companies such as Norton and perhaps add to the mountain of evidence the goverment as ammased in its antitrust investigations.

    An economy built on 20 years of incompetence won't go down without a fight. Security and vulderability of MS OSes is today just as big an issue as when I first encountered the Jerusalem virus in 1988. Where is the innovation now, MS?

    --
    XML causes global warming.
  92. Social Engineering is easier by zpengo · · Score: 5
    I've seen websites that claim to give people access to anyone's Hotmail account. All you have to do is send an e-mail to a particular address that looks valid (something like account-password@hotmail.com) and give them the login of the person whose acct you want to get into, as well as your own login and password.

    I wonder how many people fell into that trap, thinking they were gonna get into someone else's account.

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  93. Re:Wow by SimonMcC · · Score: 1

    I used it for a while when I was travelling alot (to grab my home POP3 mail, work has MS Exchange with Web Access, which is the dogs danglies..), now my ISP has a decent webmail interface and I only use HoTMail for testing accounts etc, and for MSN Messanger.

    McC

  94. Re:The intelligence of a typical computer user by RobertAG · · Score: 1

    You can educate people until you're blue in the face. Only those who want to learn will learn. When I was a sysadmin, there was certain collection of individuals that would ALWAYS need help changing their passwords when they expired. No amount of education could make the difference. FYI: Some of these people had Master's degrees.

  95. Not so fast.... by GuySmiley · · Score: 2

    the windoze default setting is to 'hide' the three letter file extenstion. If the attached file was named noodiepic.jpg.vbs, it would appear as noodiepic.jpg . Most people would feel safe (yet perverted) by opening this.

    After our beloved NTServer was 'Loved', the people with this setting only noticed the jpg icons had changed and kept infecting away. I changed this setting on all infected users to help remind them what file type it actually is.

    --
    Hey, leave comments about my mother out of this!
  96. Re:The intelligence of a typical computer user by regen · · Score: 3
    A lot of people run programs from strangers; the press and computer industry don't do a good enough job of educating people about these things.

    I saw something funny on CNBC during the ILOVEYOU worm outbreak. They were advising people not to save attachments to disk, as that could lead to infection, but to just execute the attachment. Not only was the mainstream media not educating people, they were actively making it worse.

  97. Re:Wow by hal200 · · Score: 1

    I still use my Hotmail account...as a Spam Trap. I log in once every 6 months or so to delete everything. Works like a charm!

    --

    I just want to take over the world...Why does that automatically make me EVIL?

  98. Re:Wow by jbarnett · · Score: 2


    I still have my hotmail account, I use it as my "spam bucket". You know those free website that offer free accounts (like the new york times), but you have to give them you email address? Also when registor with search engines, sign up FREE to win crap out there, just use a hotmail account and see how long it takes to fill completly full with spam (it took mine 3 days!)...

    A neat treat though, just put a filter in to filter out anything with 'A' in the subject, they allow like 5-10 filters, so delete everything that has a vowel in the subject line!

    --

    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -THHGTTG
  99. That's for a different concept. by Rurik · · Score: 1

    After the machine is infected is where the hidden extension comes into play. Or if someone was mapped to your machine, and they became infected, and you had no clue (the biggest problem in our outbreak). Then, since you didn't open the emails, you disregard the warnings, and open up your (infected) jpg's. And boom, you spread it around again, now on your entire hard drive, and everything you're mapped to.

  100. BSD bug by gatkinso · · Score: 1


    I wonder.... how many people will take the time to realize that it was a bunch of BSD hackers who implemented this hole, and not engineers at Microsoft?

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    1. Re:BSD bug by ceswiedler · · Score: 1

      Was wondering the same thing. Twenty gets you forty, the original Hotmail site had the same security hole--and probably a few more. Microsoft does TRY.

      The problem is, getting rid of security holes is like protecting the President. Doesn't matter how many times you do your job perfectly--the bad guys only have to beat you ONCE. It's just a matter of percentages.

  101. executed by people with very by LaNMaN2000 · · Score: 1

    It is "executed by people with very" little computer experience who cannot even form one complete and coherent English sentence.

    --

    ByteMyCode.com: A Web 2.0 code sharing community.
  102. Re:Wow by Jasonv · · Score: 2

    I've had a hotmail account for about 3 years and I still use it.

    Everytime I sign up for anything on the internet, anytime a webpage asks me for email, any time I have to put in an email address to 'register' a program, or any convention I sign up for, I put in my hotmail address... They then usually ask me a bunch of personal questions. I'm always 25-35 male, I make $100,000+/year and am single. And when you see all those little boxes where you check off your interests? Well, I check them all. Then I check (or uncheck) those boxes that ask me if I want their monthly, weekly, daily email magazine. Oh, and I want all the updates whenever they update their software/web page, etc...

    I currently get 7-8 emails a day at that address.. about twice a week I get one from Hotmail Staff telling me my mailbox is full.. :)

  103. Re:File extensions by Spittoon · · Score: 2

    That is *absolutely* the case. That's why the ILOVEYOU virus author renamed files not from file.ext to file.vbs but to file.ext.vbs.

    Moderate Chris Hiner's post UP.

  104. 4 Years, still use it. by BoLean · · Score: 1

    I've used it for four years. The only two times I considered giving it up wer when MS bought them (and immediately added nifty little features like defaulting to MSN, passports, and having to tab twice to enter username and password) and when I started getting spammed really bad by Email.com, AOL and Yahoo users. But then I realized that if I switched to any of the other big ones previosly mentioned it would probable get worse.

  105. Re:Fourth! by Quester · · Score: 1

    YEA FOR YOU!

    Are you self taught?

    How many hours have you logged?

    How long before you were really good?

  106. Re:(OT?) Linux alternatives for web mail? by laserjet · · Score: 1

    I never checked what they run (don't really care as long as it works) but I use newmail.net - you can use their web-based access, or they have a POP server you can also use. They also have a SMTP server that you can use, too. I have been pretty happy with them. Much more that with Hotmail.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  107. Re:No, I wouldn't. by kaball · · Score: 1

    Well in actuality if you format your HD and havent written anything else to it since format you can recover the files. When you format your not overwriting the data just clearing the node entries.So a recovery is very possible.

    --
    ctrl+shift+S
  108. Re:Nor Microsoft. MS should be sued for viruses. by Vector+Inspector · · Score: 1

    Dude, good times was a hoax. Get wit the program.

    --


    spoo

  109. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    yeah, true... but it was still a funny comment, darn it

  110. Re:On the flip side... by Platypii · · Score: 1

    Ummm, dumbass.... Macros can go into standard .doc files, not just .dot, so i think you might want to re-think your little program idea.

  111. Re:Password in the cookie? Lots! by judd · · Score: 1

    People with accounts on lots of services tend to recycle passwords, through laziness or ignorance. So if you can infer from someone's email what other services they use, you have a good chance of taking them over too.

    I used to do frontline support at a University - you would be amazed at how many people use the same password for everything.

  112. Re:File extensions by Platypii · · Score: 1

    however even with the file extentions on, windows refuses to show the .pif extention, and it's icon can be changed to whatever... i've thought this to be an interesting concept for a while, just waiting for someone to exploit it now...

  113. Re:Wow by Kryos · · Score: 1
    Quick poll: How long did you use Hotmail, and why did you finally give it up?
    2 Years. I quit when Micro$lave took over and moved to Rocketmail. Then Yahoo grabbed them. I guess it could be worse, 'tho.
    --
    Now everybody's equal, just don't measure it. -Bad Religion
  114. Re:Wow by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

    Never used hotmail, but I've had some rather good experiences with yahoo's free mail service.

    -- Dr. Eldarion --
    It's not what it is, it's something else.

  115. Totally false by TheDullBlade · · Score: 2

    The proper extension for a Word file with macros is ".dot", because it's a template (a Word template is a dynamic object which produces documents, a Word document is a static object and can't contain code) - just because Word is too stupid to complain if you name it ".doc" doesn't change that. What you're saying is like insisting that a ".jpg" can hold formatted text, arbirary JavaScript, and hyperlinks because if you rename an ".html" file to ".jpg" IE will still open it as HTML.

    At any rate, my program detected macros in files with the extension ".doc". It wasn't a program idea, it was a working program that I tested and proved effective.

    From http://www.emergency.com/wordvrus.htm:

    An important point to make here is that Word documents (.DOC files) can not contain macros, only Word templates (.DOT files) can contain macros. However, it is a relatively simple task to mask a template as a document by changing the file name extension from .DOT to .DOC.

    I hate pathetic morons who go around insulting people for imagined mistakes without checking their facts.

    --
    /.
  116. Re:The basic problem is... by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

    I bet in the UK you couldn't sue a restaurant (and win) because you spilled coffee on yourself.

    -- Dr. Eldarion --
    It's not what it is, it's something else.

  117. Re:(OT?) Linux alternatives for web mail? by Samhain · · Score: 1

    I am using a module for the ROXEN web server called IMHO (Internet Mail HOst). Just started trying it. It works well to access IMAP mail boxes over a web interface.

    The only disadvantage is that you have to be using Roxen since it is written in RXML, but some may not consider that a disadvantage.

    BTW I am using it with FreeBSD, but it will work with Linux too.

  118. This is a cross-platform exploit. by SethJohnson · · Score: 1

    Concerning this hotmail exploit, there is the same security risk on the Mac as with Wintendo. Key here is that you're not using Hotmail, but Microsoft's other e-mail product. With Lookout express on the Mac, you're safe from all the VBS ILOVEYOU-styled trojans.


    Seth

  119. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by Brett+Viren · · Score: 1
    Think of how dumb the average person is. By definition, half of the population is dumber than that...

    This is not true ``by definition'' at all. Half the population is dumber than the average person only if the median of the dumbness distribution is equal to the mean.

  120. On the flip side... by TheDullBlade · · Score: 2

    At a certain large Canadian technology company, after having the email shut down by a Word macro virus panic, I once wrote a program that identifies attachments with a ".doc" extension that are actually ".dot" files (Word document templates that could contain macro viruses). If it was a real ".doc", it just opened the file with Word; if it was a ".dot", it put up a dialog box with big biohazard signs that said "This is a falsely labeled file! It could carry a virus or trojan horse! ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO OPEN IT?"

    Everyone who saw it, including my boss, agreed that it solved the problem completely. However, nobody installed it, and nobody outside of my department was shown it. It was almost certainly deleted shortly after I left the company, and the vulnerability (to a few specific viruses) solved several months later by purchasing expensive anti-virus software.

    Home users have an excuse: most of them are ignorant. They have a vague idea of some portion of what's on their hard drive and what's on the internet, and of the difference between an application and a document. Corporations, though, want a simple solution: money out, invulnerability to viruses in. The answers have been jumping up and biting them on the nose from any halfway decent MIS department, from security websites, from annoyed articles in the trade papers, but the managers involved want their computers to "just work", and not be bothered with having to think (or making all their employees apply common sense, which, I must admit, is about as difficult as teaching cats to march in formation).

    --
    /.
    1. Re:On the flip side... by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      You don't happen to have a copy laying around, I would love something like that -grin- :)

  121. Re:Wow by Diomedes01 · · Score: 1

    Well, as if you can't guess... I dropped mine like a hot potato when MS bought out Hotmail... To understand recursion, you must first understand recursion...

    --
    "To hope's end I rode and to heart's breaking: Now for wrath, now for ruin and a red nightfall!"
  122. (OT?) Linux alternatives for web mail? by Booker · · Score: 2

    My wife uses Hotmail, because she likes the convenience of getting her mail through a web browser, from any computer. I've seen a few apps for Linux that allow you to pull your mail off a POP or IMAP server, and access it through the web (ACME mail comes to mind - http://www.astray.com/acmemail/)

    Has anyone used this, or similar programs? How well do they work? How insecure are they?

    It'd be nice to set up an alternative web mail system....

    ---

    1. Re:(OT?) Linux alternatives for web mail? by belbo · · Score: 1
      Hi.
      Don't know if this is what you were asking for, but ApexMail runs on RedHat Linux. Nifty stuff: fast, featureful and gratis (no, I don't get paid by them ;-)).

      Regards

      tom

      --

      --

      --
      "Just believe everything I tell you, and it will all be very, very simple."

  123. Re:Dealing with human tendencies by psmX · · Score: 1

    Even if you tell a person not to execute programs attached to emails that person won't believe you (or likely won't know what you are talking about). They will execute it anyway. Further proof of incompetence come when even after infecting themselves with some thing nasty, they open the attached FIXFORTHELOVEBUGTXT.vbs the next day.

  124. Re:JavaScript, not VBS... by SimonMcC · · Score: 1

    Why should we restrict our email to plain text ?
    HTML and RTF allow us to format email far more effectively than plain text ever will. Shouldn't we just make them more secure?

    McC

  125. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by adb · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean "Only Hitler..."?

  126. Re:You'd be surprised. by Maxintern9 · · Score: 1

    My boss does this. I spend at least half an hour a week backtrcking through the spastic clicking he does when unexpected dialogue boxes appear. Incidentally, I work for Microsoft. No kidding.

  127. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by ucblockhead · · Score: 1
    The number of people scoring 200+ on an IQ test is so small as to be insigificant as an average. We're talking maybe five people out of 1 billion.

    (Also confusing the matter: I don't think you can score anywhere near 0 IQ without being dead.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  128. IMG tags in emails... by ceswiedler · · Score: 3

    Oh, yes. I've actually suggested we do something similar at our company. We send out HTML emails to our customers. The URL in the IMG tag doesn't have to be an image at all--it can be a CGI page which redirects to an image. Throw a couple of parameters (like a user-id) into the URL, and the CGI page can record exactly when users open the email. Nifty, eh? I never thought of capturing the IP address directly (not something we're interested in) but it would obviously be possible.

    Wonder if this could be exploited further?

  129. No, I wouldn't. by kd5biv · · Score: 2
    I wrote a little "application" that was a simple little dialog box that asked the user if he wished to format the hard drive (in so many words) to see just how many of our in-house users really read those messages - and attached it to an email sent to everyone in the office (around 150 users). (Results were then sent to my computer through TCP connection, for those interested) 1 out of 3 users clicked yes..
    Did you then go back and resolve the IP's to machine locations and send anonymous emails to the users saying "You, sir [or madam as the case may be], are a FOOL!"?

    Why would anyone in their right mind let unknown people run foreign code on their machines? Yes, I get executable attachments sometimes myself, but why would I want to run code that does who knows what? I guess I just know too much about the kind of people out there. Yeah, maybe that's it.

    Just goes to show, once again, that there are two kinds of people in the computer world -- those who know what they're doing and understand the technology, and those who are along for the ride and depend completely on their "gurus" for anything even the slightest bit off the routine.

    I have to rant a little about this because around here 9 times out of 10 people come to me to bail them out when they screw something up, and only one of my jobs pays me for that. I have very little trouble believing that quite a few people would answer "yes" to your question, and not much more trouble believing that they would come whining to more clueful people about getting their files back afterwards.

    ("No, you don't understand. You FORMATTED the hard drive. That ERASES the hard drive. Unless you backed up those files which were ON the hard drive, they're gone. Sorry .. have a nice day ..")
    --


    73 de N5VB (ex-KD5BIV) AR SK
  130. MS Must be Implementing a Fix Right Now by carlhirsch · · Score: 2

    So I just tried to send a message through hotmail, and I got a 404-ish error. So I logged back in to Hotmail and later got a message while refreshing saying that the server holding my account was temporarily unavailable. Sounds like they're taking the machines offline to throw in a patch.

    I'm hella pissed, though, because the mail I was sending was to a headhunter I've been talking with about a sweet Linux job and I don't know if it went through or not.

    It's enough to make a person switch over to PEmail. Old habits die hard, though. I've been using Hotmail since before M$ bought them.

    -carl

    --
    . We've got computers, we're tapping phone lines, you know that ain't allowed - Talking Heads, "Life During Wartime"
  131. You'd be surprised. by RavenWolf · · Score: 5

    I wrote a little "application" that was a simple little dialog box that asked the user if he wished to format the hard drive (in so many words) to see just how many of our in-house users really read those messages - and attached it to an email sent to everyone in the office (around 150 users). (Results were then sent to my computer through TCP connection, for those interested) 1 out of 3 users clicked yes..

    1. Re:You'd be surprised. by G27+Radio · · Score: 2

      There was a problem with the code I was using so this wasn't working properly earlier. It is now. There's an interesting article about this type of web trojan on kuro5hin.org. There's a lot of discussion about it on Zope as well. It affects just about every web site out there.

      I decided not to have the link cause you to profess your love for Bill Gates to this thread. Instead I set up a sid here.

      numb

    2. Re:You'd be surprised. by wemmick · · Score: 1
      If you're a sysadmin or a help-desk person or a person who your co-workers trust on techie matters, you're not helping and your data are flawed.

      While it's true that too many users ignore warning dialog boxes, it's also true that many users won't know the difference between "format" and "defrag".

      When somebody they trust pulls tricks like this, it only confuses them more.

      Then again, if it keeps them from opening suspect files, may it is good after all.

      --
      ___
      Cognitive Overflow
      more than yo
    3. Re:You'd be surprised. by Tokyo+Joe · · Score: 1

      Im not, but was surprised.

      On the Monday Morning after the ILOVEYOU gig I sent out an HTML email titled NOONELOVESME. The design being to look like the ILOVEYOU virus. It included a little VBS prog that played a game of connect 4 (Stolen from the M$ web page...)

      Despite the media attention of the previous 3 days only one person bothered to Phone me and ask what it was before opeening the e-mail and playing the game!

      --
      Tokyo Joe
  132. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by pnevares · · Score: 2

    Like the Dilbert comic where the boss becomes irate at a statistic that 40% of sick days are on Monday and Friday.

    *gasp*!

    Pablo Nevares, "the freshmaker".

    --

    Pablo Nevares, "the freshmaker".
  133. No, not a hole in Hotmail. by kwsNI · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is announcing it as an undocumented feature, not a security hole...

    kwsNI

    1. Re:No, not a hole in Hotmail. by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1

      I would say that it's NOT a hole in Hotmail, but a hole in the browser. Color me crazy but I believe that a mail server's purpose is to send data to you, not to scan/prevent bad data from getting to you.

      The way the process works now, it's only a matter of time before the next java filter work-around gets through. It's like filtering ILOVEYOU in subject lines, it only works until... whoops somebody changed the subject line. Now if the client had those dangerous actions fixed/disabled then instead of filtering for KNOWN problems they could prevent the problems from occuring to begin with.

      Kinda like chasing our own tail is what it seems like to me. My opinion is that Hotmail should NOT filter anything and make the browser responsible.

  134. Dealing with human tendencies by Phydoux · · Score: 3
    This reminds me of something I heard a long time ago that has to do with human tendencies:

    "If you tell a man that there are millions of stars in the sky, he'll believe you. If you caution a man about wet paint, he'll have to touch it before he'll believe you."

    You can remind people ad nauseum that you shouldn't execute programs attached to e-mails because they might contain viruses. Most won't remember or believe you until they experience a virus infection for themselves.
    --

    --
    If a tree fell on a florist, and nobody was around to hear it, would he make a noise?
  135. The intelligence of a typical computer user by seanshannon · · Score: 1
    A lot of people run programs from strangers; the press and computer industry don't do a good enough job of educating people about these things. Of course, I think Microsoft deserves most of the blame on this one. Especially if the trojan is a known quantity, how hard can it be to screen all incoming messages for that particular attachment?

    Sean Shannon

    --

    Sean Shannon
    Proprietor and Editor-in-chief,

    1. Re:The intelligence of a typical computer user by duffbeer703 · · Score: 1

      I go to the University at Albany, SUNY. One of my friend's professors was going through his mail in class and noticed several ILOVEYOU's from the Senior Administrative types, including the president of the University. I'm glad that someone that intelligent is running a university.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  136. not just hotmail... by jesser · · Score: 3
    remember the CERT advisory in february about untrusted people being able to make it seem like javascript code came from a trusted website? i was wondering when someone would start exploiting this seriously. almost every site with dynamic content that isn't completely controlled by the site's owner is vulnerable to similar attacks.

    the next step is a worm that affects web discussion forums. i wouldn't be at all surprised if slashdot was its main target, just because of slashdot's size and the fact that javascript's security model is messed up on all browsers.

    --

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  137. Re:The acutal nature of the Hotmail hole by jovlinger · · Score: 1

    yes. I too was suprised that the poster apparently had failed to read the article.

    Now that has to be the height of laziness

  138. Re:GUI designers take note by trust_no_one · · Score: 1
    The problem with this is that all too often GUI applications pop up useless message boxes. The easiest way for a programmer to get text onto the screen is often a message box. These messages are usually either purely informational messages, or they are confirmation messages "Are you sure?" Both are purely unnecessary in 95% of all cases. The informational messages don't require the entire application to stop and wait for the user acknowledge the message, but the programmer is too lazy to actually communicate the information in a less intrusive way. Confirmation boxes are slightly more justifiable perhaps, but are still way overused. At least 9 times out of 10 the answer to "Do you really want to do what you just did?" is yes and why do I have to click another button to get the program to do what I just told it to do.

    Alan Cooper in About Face characterizes the message box as "arguably the most abused part of the graphic user interface." As he states later in the book, confirmation messages "only work when they are unexpected." The answer isn't to make the users do even more work to get past these useless messages, but for programmers to stop forcing the users to click through endless dialog boxes to perform the simplest tasks.

    --
    I'm not an actor, but I play one on tv.
  139. JavaScript, not VBS by the_demiurge · · Score: 1

    From the page, this seems to be an unfriendly JavaScript exploit, not Visual Basic Script, and pretty different from ILOVEYOU.

    Scientia est Potentia.

  140. Hooray for Javascript by / · · Score: 3

    It doesn't actually do many of the horrible things associated with the ILOVEYOU crap, but it will let someone else commandeer your hotmail account.

    A quick summary: javascript in a rogue cookie on a hostile site tells Hotmail to send its own cookies to someone else. Once that person has those cookies, he has all the authentication he needs to use/abuse the original person's Hotmail account.

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
    1. Re:Hooray for Javascript by mochaone · · Score: 1

      As anyone who reads /. should know, you can't put anything programmatic in a cookie (and that includes jscript).

      Oh, really ?

      Why don't you check this Cert Advisory then. I'll post a snippet for you:

      Attacks May Be Persistent Through Poisoned Cookies

      Once malicious code is executing that appears to have come from the authentic web site, cookies may be modified to make the attack persistent. Specifically, if the vulnerable web site uses a field from the cookie in the dynamic generation of pages, the cookie may be modified by the attacker to include malicious code. Future visits to the affected web site (even from trusted links) will be compromised when the site requests the cookie and displays a page based on the field containing the code.


      There have been numerous examples given on how to exploit this. They all involve inserting javascript code into a cookie.

      --
      Hates people who have stupid little sigs
  141. Techies as car mechanics by yankeehack · · Score: 1
    Before complaining about how imcompetent people are, consider the fact that MOST PEOPLE out there in the real world have little or no computer know how.

    I can tell that a good many of you have had the experience of explaining how, say, a hard drive works and seeing your co-worker's (or parents, great aunt, 3rd grade teacher, manager, etc.) eyes glaze over and their heads nod listlessly. To tell the truth, most people I have run into are scared of doing something wrong. Won't even open one up to put in a stick of RAM. "It's for the professionals to do" they say (and then they gladly pay someone at the local office supply store to do it for some ungodly sum.)

    I think it is the job of the techies to be proactive and protect those "lusers" as much as possible. Go ahead, slam MS as much as you want, but if you're expecting for that lawyer or doctor or insurance adjuster whose computer you just worked on to be cognizant of the dangers of clicking on an attachment, don't hold your breath.

    After all, how many of you know enough about your car to dispute your mechanic's diagnosis of that funny sound you hear when you put on the brakes? It's for the professionals to do, correct?

  142. Re:Password in the cookie? Lots! by jesser · · Score: 1
    People with accounts on lots of services tend to recycle passwords, through laziness or ignorance. So if you can infer from someone's email what other services they use, you have a good chance of taking them over too.

    good point.

    --

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  143. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

    I'm suprised it was that low. There are ALOT of stupid people out there.

  144. Hotmail is the most spam free service I know of by indiigo · · Score: 1

    By turning on their SPAM protection and having it go directly into my trash, I have received probably one piece of spam in the past month, and I have everything going into this account, I use it for posts on usenet, and regular mail still goes through... it's very very nice... They really have cleaned up their act...

    --
    fslg503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-86 8650 3-985-fdsg8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-9
  145. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by dragonfly_blue · · Score: 1
    Only you would want to turn a funny thread into a political argument.

    --
    Free music from Jack Merlot.
  146. "average" has several meanings... by TheDullBlade · · Score: 2

    including both median and mean. Anyway, because intelligence isn't really something you can put a real number to, we're free to fake a nice balanced bell curve where the median and the mean are the same. I think it works out that way with I.Q.

    --
    /.
  147. bloody 'ell by / · · Score: 1

    You're right of course (and I realized my mistake moments after submitting). s/in cookie/on website/i.

    --
    "If one is really a superior person, the fact is likely to leak out without too much assistance" -- John Andrew Holmes
  148. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by Tava · · Score: 1

    Actually, as other posters have already told you, half of the population is dumber than the median, not the average.
    The interesting thing is that MORE than half is dumber than the average Joe: the lower tail of the distribution "saturates" on 0 IQ, while there is no limit on higher than average IQs.
    Put it another way, with very few exceptions, noone can be dumber than mud (IQ 0) while there will be few(?) more than twice as smart as our beloved Joe!

  149. The article says Java Script, not VBS.. by dwlemon · · Score: 1

    And by looking at what CmdrTaco wrote up there, he's been hitting the bottle early this morning.

    Could this also affect Yahoo or other web-mail services? Or just Hotmail because of the specific kind of info they keep in their cookies?

  150. GUI designers take note by clearcache · · Score: 1

    Users have become so numb to the pop-up dialog "Click Yes/OK to continue" that they are no longer a fully effective tool in GUI design. Time to think up something that will not provoke a knee-jerk reaction every time it pops up. I admit it, when I'm in a hurry, I click "OK" as soon as I see it, too.

    1. Re:GUI designers take note by mrdisco99 · · Score: 1
      Well, if Windows wasn't so error-prone, we wouldn't get used to seeing dialog boxes. I've noticed that in Windows I tend to click OK without reading, but when I'm running GNOME, I actually read what the box has to say. I assume this is because I'm just used to them coming up in Windows, while in GNOME they're somewhat of a novelty.

      Also, for web browsers, many times it's easy to disable dialog boxes you don't really need... like those telling you you're about to visit a secure site. By reducing the usual number of dialog boxes that pop up, you take more notice of the ones that do.


      +++

      --

      +++
      NO CARRIER

    2. Re:GUI designers take note by Glytch · · Score: 1

      Dude, this is an excellent idea! As a matter of fact, I'm going to add something very similiar to it to a program I'm writing. Thanks for the suggestion.

      Err, I hate to say this, knowing I'll be struck down, but moderators, take a look at the above.

  151. Re:File extensions by pallotta · · Score: 1

    How many non-geeks do you think are aware of this choice at all, let alone what it means?

  152. Sounds like a javascript bug to me by bluGill · · Score: 2

    From they way this story is worded, I'm led to belive that you could construct a similear javascript to get the cookies from anywebsite.

    Just one more reason that I only use crashscape (Which is what I've been calling that program since 1.1 when I first saw it) with sites I trust. Mostly my bank because they require javascript for some reasons (at least to log in, once I'm logged in I've disabled it with no problems, but that is a pain)

  153. File extensions by Chris+Hiner · · Score: 5

    What alot of us forget, is that Windows 95 defaults to not showing the extension for files it knows the type of. So if you name a file NIFTY_PICTURE.GIF.VBS, alot of non technical people will see it as NIFTY_PICTURE.GIF. But when they double click it, it runs...
    (Win98 may default to this too, I don't remember)

    I suspect lots of nongeeks leave it at the default...

    1. Re:File extensions by kingrat · · Score: 1

      Win98 does default with file extensions off.

    2. Re:File extensions by Stormie · · Score: 1

      That is *absolutely* the case. That's why the ILOVEYOU virus author renamed files not from file.ext to file.vbs but to file.ext.vbs.

      That is *not* the case with Win95 and Outlook97.. regardless of whether I set my system to hide file extensions of known filetypes, Outlook displayed the ILOVEYOU attachment with the full ".txt.vbs" extension.

  154. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Use the Preview Button! Don't forget to Preview before posting!! Thanks!!!

  155. A typical day at the luser's email box by gatesh8r · · Score: 1
    Luser: "Hey -- I just got this new Hotmail account. Now I can talk to all my friends!"

    The luser types away, giving its username and easily guessable password...

    Luser: "Oh, look -- my fiance sent me an email. How do I know? It's entitled, 'ILOVEYOU'. I guess she doesn't use spaces. btw, what's with this .VBS file?"

    Another luser gets flooded with 50 or so of these email from all of the luser's friends and family.

    Luser: "Wow -- advertizing! I should look at one of these! Oh, what's this? Two files, one with the extention .EXE, and the other with the extension .VBS! WOW!"

    Talk about ".DUM"...geez, will lusers ever learn?

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  156. who does this? by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

    ok, who does this, huh?
    the same people who click 20 times to open an email cause they have so much sh!t open. Then they wonder why they have so many copies of it open...they don't know how many times to click when they are told to "double-click".
    "Leave the gun, take the canoli."

    --
    this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
  157. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by plague3106 · · Score: 1

    Hmm..speaking of stupid. You forgot to tell me what i mean. Also, i was not aware that the *nix dict command was the be all end all when it comes to english words. Ain't wasn't in the dictionary for a long time either, but that didn't stop people from using it.

  158. Wow by zpengo · · Score: 3
    Another grammatically fascinating post by CmdrTaco, and another administratively fascinating event in the history of Microsoftified Hotmail.

    I'm sure that pretty much everyone here has or has had a Hotmail account at some point in the past. Quick poll: How long did you use Hotmail, and why did you finally give it up?

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  159. The basic problem is... by fraserspeirs · · Score: 2

    People are lazy and don't consider the ramifications of what they do. This puts more burden on programmers to protect idiots from themselves.

    There are many alternatives to Outlook Express (in the case of the love bug) or Hotmail, but people that are too lazy to properly evaluate the suitability and safety of their tools will get hurt. This happens with physical tools

    That taiwanese-brand hammer is way more likely to split and send shards into your eye, but is that your fault or the manufacturers fault? In the US, it is of course entirely the manufacturer's. In the UK, well, the judge would make an arbitrary partition and say it was maybe 60% the manufacturers fault, and 40% mine. Of course the UK approach is much less sane.

    1. Re:The basic problem is... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      what if it was so hot that it melted through the cup? (you should read up on the FACTS of the McDonald's coffee case)

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  160. RE: dealing with dip$hit coworkers by merganser · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the tip. I have now created just such a folder. It never ceases to amaze me who opens these things and ends up hosing-up my entire day cleaning up the mess. And then once they know they are busted they don't want you to tell anyone they opened it. more advice for dealing with dip$hit coworkers? We all have a lot of 'em.

  161. Gimme mod points, quicky! by RPoet · · Score: 1

    I need to moderate this up. No wait, it has to be a lie, 33% of human kind _can't_ be that stupid. :/
    --

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
    1. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by BlueMonk · · Score: 1

      I won't be convinced until 34% try to do the same in 2000 :)

    2. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by BlueMonk · · Score: 2

      On a related note, I heard that studies have shown that half of the population make up 50% of the people.

    3. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by RavenWolf · · Score: 2

      You've never worked a help desk, have you?

    4. Re:Gimme mod points, quicky! by Ig0r · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't unconstitutional, they probly would (which is more sad).

      --

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
  162. I'd call it "resetting the filesystem" by yerricde · · Score: 2

    How's "resetting the filesystem" for a name?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  163. 11 months and still counting. by yerricde · · Score: 2

    I normally use Hotmail through Outlook Express (no flames please; my filename extensions are not hidden). When I get a spammer, I just report her.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  164. Re:first by jgriss · · Score: 1

    No that's for 2n"d posters

  165. you missed the point by NuclearArchaeologist · · Score: 1
    The point was that people don't read the dialog. It could have said anything, and 1/3 of the users would have punched yes. The average user sees so many anoying and useless pop up windows, that they have learned to ignore them to get what they want.

    There is an analog in meatspace warning lables. Due to lawsuits, warning lables on all sorts of products have become small books. The few usefull messages are lost in the clutter. Have you read all the warnings on your step ladder? No, you just used it. The one or two sensible warnings were lost in a blizzard of BS about pregnant woment not opperating heavy machinery.

    Conditioned like a rat.

  166. Re:Who opens these? by Digital+Mage · · Score: 1

    The people who open these are the same people who ran the Elf Bowling game a few months ago.

    How do you know that the game came from Nordstrom's (I believe that was the company) when the damn thing isn't even signed with a legitimate certificate. It is attachments like these that ease people's minds into thinking that only good can come from opening foreign attachments.

    The next time I see garbage like this without a legit certificate I'm giving them a piece of my mind.

  167. Here Here! by FatSean · · Score: 1

    Agreement. Of course, I wouldn't be surprised if the sandbox implementation in the Visual J++ "Virtual Machine" has a bunch of holes in it. Just seems par for the course...

    --
    Blar.
  168. Which are the parties responsible? by Paul+Neubauer · · Score: 1

    (ok, who does this, huh? I mean, viewing a gif or clicking a URL, but running a strange program? The mind boggles).

    If I read the attack information right, the user would see an HTML file.. to many, just another web site. Now, even if it wasn't such, who would press on and get zapped?

    Likely the click-happy, who don't see an odd extension as one or such, but just click reflexively, as they've always done. One more reason I loathe attachments. (I was getting emails at work that were just attachments, no explanation, not even a sbject. Someone got offended when I replied "Deleted: Unread, not important enough for sender to identify, not important enough to read.")

    Microsoft/HotMail? Yes, left a door unlocked. They really should lock it properly. But an unlocked door doesn't get opened by itself.

    Some crackerd00d wannabe? Yes, that person opens the door, or at least puts up the sign on it suggesting that it be opened. But even this person hasn't done the real damage.

    The first two set up conditions for the rest. The ones who don't see what they look at and just click, just like always, not pausing to inspect.

    There was(is) a hole, and someone has exploited it... but, in the recent "LoveBug" case, there were a surprising number of accomplices all over the globe.

    --
    I don't subscribe to RMS's GNUtopian vision.
  169. Who opens these? by Bitter+Cup+O+Joe · · Score: 2

    Most people wouldn't think twice about opening a snail mail package addressed to them, even if it has not return address on it, and seems somewhat heavy. That's why the unabomber managed to rack up a pretty decent string before being caught. People don't tend to think that bad things will happen to them when they are using tools that they deal with everyday without understanding.

    To put it another way, while most people think of themselves as fairly decent drivers, how often in the past week have you been cut off, or had the guy in front of you make a turn without signalling? People get so used to using tools that they become careless; this is compounded if the person doesn't understand how the tool that they are using works, or at least had it drilled into their heads the way to safely use the tool.

    It's just a matter of time before people get more careful about opening things they're not sure are safe. I imagine Thag got a lot more careful with fire after watching Thog torch himself.

    --
    "This is your world. These are your people. You can live for yourself today, or help build tomorrow for everyone."
  170. Re:JavaScript, not VBS... by Narmi · · Score: 1

    I hate HTML formatted messages. Basic tags are ok (like bold, italic), but I really don't like colors. I often get emails with black text on a dark background, or yellow text on a white background. Plain text is easier for me to read, and uses less bandwidth.

  171. What's the risk on the Mac side of the equation? by www.thefish.com · · Score: 1

    Slightly off-topic -- non-hotmail point, about OE:

    I'm running OE on the Mac laptop, only because of one key feature it has, and just switched back to it from Mailsmith, actually.

    The feature was the ability of it to automatically detect what proxy settings to use with my home Wingate machine without having to adjust anything in OE itself. I haven't seen another program be able to do that. I just tell the Mac about my Proxy IP, OE (and IE, for that matter) sense the configuration change in the Apple system files and adjust appropriately. No manual, or otherwise, adjustments needed in my browser or mail client needed!

    But, now I'm a little concerned about OE, even though it doesn't speak VBscript on the Mac, because other malicious content can be sent to it. I'd say it's running 60/40 on the PC only vs. Mac,too OE bug effectiveness meter. Don't quote me on that...

    Has anyone seen a Mac mail client that is that versatile, eh? I think not. But OE also scares me, none-the-less. I'd use Linux, but our foreign language translation business really demands the use of a Mac, believe it or not. ;-P

    Comments and thoughts, and suggestions of other mail clients are welcome and invited...

    --
    -- I lived through the IPO Rush of '99
  172. The acutal nature of the Hotmail hole by sammy+baby · · Score: 5

    Contrary to the reporting on /., the most recent Hotmail hole is in no way related to a VBS script. What's so alarming about the hole is that it is acutally an HTML file which contains the exploit. More specifically:

    The folks over at Hotmail were smart enough to filter out JavaScript from HTML formatted messages sent to Hotmail recipients. They did not, however, think that it would be necessary to filter HTML attachments, either. As a result, a clever individual was able to construct an HTML page containing JavaScript which forwards HotMail authorization cookies to a third party.

    Ironically, this information is largely reproduced from the article on Peacefire cited in the original post. No mention of VBS files anywhere.

  173. why people open these things by markus+o'farkus · · Score: 1
    There's a reason why I say open. They are not 'running' them as far as they are concerned. In this case anyway, they were probably trying to view the document, not 'run a script' or even 'run a program'.

    And don't forget it did have a txt in there. And if you save it to the desktop first, it looks like a text file. windows by default hides the file extension, which in this case is vbs, so you are left with just .txt. And have you seen the vbs icon? It looks like a scroll.

    Lastly, if you get something in your real mail that you look at and say wtf? wouldn't you open it? (yeah, yeah, yeah, not if it looked like a bomb, right?)

    And I'm kind of surprised there aren't more trojaned joke email programs. Those things get sent around like no tomorrow if they're funny enough (and some, uh, less so)... remember elf bowling? the combo#5 flash program? that fucking cat that walks around on the desktop... In other words, people are just plain used to viewing and running attachments in most settings.

  174. JavaScript, not VBS... by Spoing · · Score: 1

    This one can't be blamed on VBS -- JavaScript was used for this exploit. Since Hotmail requires JavaScript, this means that all users -- not just those with Windows -- could have been victimized by this exploit.

    This one could impact other web-email sites.

    ObBias: Email shouldn't be in HTML, let alone have embeded scipts...strip it all folks!

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  175. Who Opens these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately everyone at my work. Which leads me to believe that virii will always be a problem. We all know that windows is really bad for security, but I don't think your average human can handle multiuser OS's. The few people here that have switched to win2000 always insist that they have administrative rights to their computer and I don't blame them. The only unix platform I think most of these people can handle is BeOS which is in essence is a single user OS. I think we are doomed to dealing with these virii for as long as we have personal computers as we know them.