Slashdot Mirror


Gas-Powered Shoes?

Glen Davis writes: "A Russian inventor has created motorized shoes! The shoes weigh 2 pounds apiece, and work by means of foot-long pistons which trigger a plate attached to the shoe's sole. Single strides are up to 13 feet long, and wearers can attain speeds of up to 25 mph! The shoes are gas-powered." (BBC article with pictures here, submitted by Ave.)

185 comments

  1. Yes, Yes, YES! by Seumas · · Score: 2
    So long as I won't be at risk of exploding or falling flat on my face into the asphalt while wearing them, I want a pair!

    I don't drive. Driving sucks. Traffic in the Bay area sucks. I live almost nine miles away from my company's campus and I would love a pair of these to trot along at a nice 25mph along the side of the San Tomas expressway.

    These would also come in handy when your boss is chasing you down the hall to hand you some extra work. With these suckers, it's just one big leap and you're half way across the building, out of his path!

    I wish there were photos of the shoes. God, I want a pair so bad!
    ---
    seumas.com

    1. Re:Yes, Yes, YES! by carlos_benj · · Score: 2
      These would also come in handy when your boss is chasing you down the hall to hand you some extra work. With these suckers, it's just one big leap and you're half way across the building, out of his path!

      I would think indoor use would probably be ill-advised. Unless you enjoy wearing accoustical tile headgear. Not to mention the problem caused by your throat hitting those thin metal cross braces at 25 mph. Ouch!

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  2. Has the whole world gone insane?!? by FSK · · Score: 1

    1. What is the long-term effect of its use on your joints? After using these things a while I assume you wind up spending your later years in a wheelchair. 2. (At the risk of sounding like a ludite) do we really need gas powered shoes?

    --
    When punk rock is outlawed, only outlaws will have punk rock.
  3. Re:Dangerous? by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

    heck, I've gone 40mph on my bicycle several times. I don't want to think of what would have happened if I had fallen off, my chain had jammed, there was an unseen stick in the roadway, etc...

    But I really am concerned about how one STOPS in these boots, or how one controls the speed. And if a 'normal' person can get up to 25mph, can an olympic runner go faster than that in these boots?

    - Spryguy

    --

    - Spryguy
    There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  4. Re:Re-inventing the wheel ... by jovlinger · · Score: 1

    well the pongo stick is why perdita had so many dalmatians.

    On a slightly less feasetious note, I do recall seeing a gas powered pogo stick.

  5. Re:Let's ban 'em (was Re:Dangerous?) by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

    This should be moderated up, 2 (funny!)

    - Spryguy

    --

    - Spryguy
    There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  6. the dog runs on "regular" by mr.ska · · Score: 1

    So, 40 km/h for a human. That's pretty good. So what happens if we make shoes for *other* non-bipedal animals?

    - The Kentucky Derby is overshadowed by the Yamaha Goodyear Derby 500, where gas-powered horseshoes propel specially trained jockeys to 100 km/h, and banked corners are mandated after one too many dull, wet thuds in turn 1.

    - Police dogs don't ride in the K-9 unit anymore, they run along side of it, and chase down criminals in the next borough. You think dogs chased cars before? Just think of a car theif seeing an angry German Shepard closing in on their stolen ride. Is that a brick in your pants, or are you surrendering peacefully?

    - Mice in space. No, we don't make shoes for them. Just rig up one of these shoes as a mouse trap, and spring the little bugger into orbit. Confused by happy birds of prey get to pluck their lunch right out of the air.

    No sense in limiting this to just shoes, either. Ski boots could give hot-doggers the air they've been looking for. Heck, ski-jump in Saskatchewan. Imagine figure skating with gasoline-assisted jumps... instant replay is required to figure out whether it was a octuple axel, or merely the standard septuple.

    I think this just goes to show that engineers should be given good jobs and a decent salary... to keep them out of trouble and coming up with goofy crap like this. :) (I should know - I'm one.)

    --

    Mr. Ska

  7. Re:Calif. must love this. More $$$ from smog check by jafac · · Score: 1

    Hey, my new fuckin lawn mower (CA), has a SEALED engine. I cannot take it apart and fix it myself. Only the certified Sears guys are allowed (by law) to service it, lest the enduser (me) misadjusts the engine or rigs it for better performance/worse emissions.

    They're serious about this stuff.

    Maybe I'll just buy a goat, because the engine has started to misbehave, it runs fast-slow-fast-slow for no reason, and to get Sears to look at it? $50 just to crack the case, more if there's work that needs to be done. Bottom line, if you need any serious work on your lawnmower, you're better off buying a new one. What happens to the old one? Landfill.

    If it ain't broke, fix it 'til it is!

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  8. Re:You laugh!! by Phaser777 · · Score: 1

    Now we just need another species to go to war with... In the absence of evil giant mutant bugs, I propose attacking Microsoft. They're the next best thing.

  9. What if one shoe runs out of gas before the other? by systemapex · · Score: 1

    Think about the pathetic situation that would happen if one shoe ran out of gas before the other! I wouldn't want to be in that person's shoes.

  10. Long term health risks. by ^_^x · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long your knees/ankles would last if these were used regularly? It can't be a smooth ride.

  11. Mr. Bill's interested! by masoolsa · · Score: 1

    Woah.. starting to sound like a Borg drone.

    Add a laser scope to your HUD and
    a put on a mechanical hand-piece glove and you're all set!

    (If you're short on cash, use a cheap laser
    pointer, and hold on to a plier in your hand.)

  12. Re:Can I be a superhero now? by evilad · · Score: 1

    Good idea! Ironically enough, the Ursus Mark VI failed because of mobility problems. I won't spoil the plot of the amazingly fine movie by telling any more.

    I hear he's working on Mark VII right now. I can hardly wait for Project Grizzly II.

  13. How do you top a boot? Tep on the toe, tupid! by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2
    One question though - how do you stop? The BBC article says the pistons are triggered by the foot hitting the ground...
    Typical journalist who doesn't bother getting all the facts. If the thing fired as soon as it was compressed, it would throw you back when you landed after a step. The obvious trick is to have the piston be triggered when you unload your heel and push with your toe. This isn't something you do until you're already pushing away for the next step. If the piston turns a 300-pound, 3-inch stroke of your toe into a 300-pound, 12-inch stroke of the entire sole plate, you're going to get some serious distance from it.

    If these guys have done their homework, the two boots are interlocked so that if one quits, the other shuts down too. I suppose it would be a shock to have a 12-foot stride suddenly followed by a 3-foot stride because of a fouled sparkplug.
    --
    Ancient Goth: Someone who overthrew the Roman Empire.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  14. Re:Dangerous? by Badmovies · · Score: 1

    That subject line was the first thing that crossed my mind upon reading this too. Collisions in a car at 25mph are going to result in little damage (so long as you are wearing your seltbelt), but stumble at that speed and I don't relish the idea of skidding on my face. Wearing the same protective gear as a rollerblader might work though.

    He should find that guy who created the bear suit, I would love to watch him hopping around a Kodiak.


    Andrew Borntreger

    --


    Andrew Borntreger
    Champion of cinematic disasters
  15. Re:Let's ban 'em (was Re:Dangerous?) by slashdot-me · · Score: 1

    Approx 800 bike deaths / year in the US. Compare to 200 deaths / year due to lightning.

    Ryan

  16. It's the wrong shoes Gromit! by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 1

    And they've gone wrong!!!
    Hmm.. I could do with a bit of cheese now.
    ^. .^

  17. Re:Can I be a superhero now? by Accipiter · · Score: 2
    Fighting evil helps, too. ;)

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  18. Long strides, but no jumps by AethericFlux · · Score: 1
    Just from looking at the design of the shoes and the descriptions given, it looks as though the shoes are designed solely (ouch) for running. I can't see how it would be possible to adapt this design to use in more vertical jumps, such as would be suggested by real accessibility as the article mentioned.

    The other thing that noone discusses is how you are supposed to stop. Every time your foot applies a certain amount of pressure to the shoe, it fires the boosters. I can just see people trying the slalom to a halt.

  19. the million dollar man by ^chuck^ · · Score: 1
    Geez, given all these postings, what with the HGP and the super armor, you could say:

    We have the technology...

    Brought to you by CHuCK, who is still stuck somewhere in 1985

    --

    Lemure, wtf! Don't you mean Lemur?
  20. Re:I thought of this when I was 10 by anatoli · · Score: 2

    Amazingly, when I was 10, I saw a description of exactly this thing in a popular technical magazine (aimed at 10-year-olds, appropriately). The thing was invented by yet another 10-year-old. This was, like, 25 years ago...
    --

    --
    Industrial space for lease in Flatlandia.
  21. Real Progress at Last. . . by Spasemunki · · Score: 1

    Bringing humanity one step closer to achieving its ideal: Inspector Gadget.

    "Sweet creeping zombie Jesus!"

    1. Re:Real Progress at Last. . . by The_Rook · · Score: 1

      no, not inspector gadget. this is for the secret super mario brothers in all of us...

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  22. Re:Dangerous? by Jonathan · · Score: 2

    What happens when someone runs into a wall or lamp post at 25MPH? Or worse, hits another pedestrian?

    Nothing good, but then bicyclists can go 25MPH too, and can also crash into walls and pedestrians.

  23. Old News! by Louziffer · · Score: 1
    Anyone ever seen that horrible 1993 movie, Super Mario Bros.? Isn't it interesting that they seem to have basically the same boots that they show in this article?

    Man... I never knew that movie would come back to haunt us in this way. I guess that if there's a screwy idea out there, there's always someone on the planet that's gonna try it. Time to sit back and wait for the Koopa Troopahs.

    LouZiffer

    --

    LouZiffer

  24. Another superpower down by bug_hunter · · Score: 1

    now I just need that laser surgery that improves eyesight beyond 20/20, use that growth hormone that used on the mice, bionic arms, and bionic hearing and I can beat the crap out of the 6 million dollar man.

    --
    It's turtles all the way down.
  25. British Inventors by ichimunki · · Score: 1

    are already working on a super-cooled potato powered version of these shoes. I expect to see the RIAA sue the makers since it will be easier to carry pirated CDs from one house to a friend's house across town. Besides, doesn't Ford have a patent on the piston? I may not be a lawyer, but I smell the liability lawsuits on these shoes four continents away.

    --
    I do not have a signature
  26. Re:I thought of this when I was 10 by dangermouse · · Score: 1

    ...and man, would those shoes launch a 10-year-old!

  27. Re:37 km/h? by Zoyd · · Score: 2
    AC said:
    The bbc page claims that:

    The fastest sprinter at the Sydney Olympics will not surpass 37km/h (23 mph)

    It's going to be a boring 100m competition then. Even if the runners could achieve their maximum velocity (37km/h, or 10.28 m/s) in just two seconds (the first 10 meters) of acceleration, then the winning time would be somewhere close to 11 seconds.

    A more realistic estimate for the maximum speed [calculations]....

    This tells us the maximum speed will be somewhere around ... 34 mph.

    You are correct in pointing out, AC, that 23 MPH is not the typical top speed of 100m sprints. 23 MPH is actually the average velocity of 100m sprints. But top speeds aren't 34 MPH as you calculate. Top speeds are actually about 27 MPH.

    Here's a little tidbit on the subject from the Mathematical Accociation of America.

    World's Fastest Man
    The 1998 edition of The Guinness Book of World Records features an article about Donovan Bailey, billed as the fastest man alive.
    The article begins: "Canadian Donovan Bailey rocketed into the record books when he set a new world mark of 9.84 seconds for the 100-meter dash at the Atlanta Olympics." It briefly recounts Bailey's career and, toward the end, quotes Bailey: "No one has ever run as fast as I have, running 27 mph."

    When Roy D. North, a computer programmer and mathematical gadfly now based in Connecticut, came across that passage, something bothered him. When he calculated Bailey's speed from the given time and distance, he obtained 22.7 miles per hour.

    "What went wrong here?" North wondered. "Was Bailey misquoted? Was there a typo?"

    North had to find out how that apparent mismatch had come about, and his search turned up an article in the Aug. 5, 1996, Sports Illustrated. The account mentioned that Bailey's speed at the 60-meter mark of the race was 27.1 miles per hour.

    Mystery solved! One speed was the average over the entire race, and the other was the instantaneous velocity at a particular point in the race.

  28. Shoes Mk II by jd · · Score: 2
    Not to be outdone, TSR announced their own 7 league boots. Questions as to their safety were ignored.

    In other news, the JCB GT, the 110mph turbocharged mechanical digger has won an award as the craziest invention not yet bought by Microsoft.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  29. Return of the Super Mario Brothers? by bconway · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or do those look suspiciously like something seen in the Mario Brothers movie? I hope they don't hold a patent on this, things could get really ugly.

    --
    Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru?
  30. Bored? by Signal+11 · · Score: 3

    This is another example of what happens when you get a bunch of bored engineers in a room.

    1. Re:Bored? by JSurguy · · Score: 1

      It brings tears to my eyes to imagine something that puts one foot 13' away from the other at 25 mph.......

    2. Re:Bored? by cybercyst · · Score: 1

      i think its kinda cool myself, i can't wait to see the nike brand gas powered sneaker.

    3. Re:Bored? by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      terry pratchet? One of the first ones (color of magic, light fantastic?)

    4. Re:Bored? by JSurguy · · Score: 1

      Think so.... Cannae remeber - have to go dig them out...

  31. Re:Helmets? by slashdot-me · · Score: 2

    Have you ever seen a collision where a car hit something head on? Each and every one has a bright red splat where the driver's head hit the windshield. Why don't we mandate helmets for drivers? Helmets would surely save lives in these types of collisions.

    Since cars are more dangerous (greater speed) and more deadly (greater number of deaths) they seem to be a natural target for helmet advocates. Yet these people go after bikes. Why? Surely they aren't concerned with safety or they would attack cars too. Hmmmm...

    Ryan

  32. Re:Can I be a superhero now? by owillis · · Score: 1

    You do understand that the rise of gas-powered superheros requires the arrival of supervillians? Face your doom, hero - boy! :)

    --
    OliverWillis.Com
    An Operative with an Agenda
  33. Boots of speed +10 !! by Benjamin+Shniper · · Score: 3

    Now all I need is some gloves of power and I'll rule the world!

    HAHAHAHAHA

  34. Re:Might actually save knees... by SciBoy · · Score: 1
    It's not the landing I'm worried about, it's the sudden takeoff. Tennis players ruin their knees just taking the jolts from their own body weight running back an forth. I think they need to make a metal exo-skeleton if they intend people to use it more than intermittantly.

    Actually, I've thought about those for a long time. It's wierd that we don't have those "Aliens" robot lifters already. It wouldn't be hard to make the controls for them. Just put pressure sensors on the inside of a normal glove and shirt-arm, when you move your arm you pressure the sensors that control the motors in the exo-skeleton. More pressure, more speed and strength. We should've had it by now.

    --
    "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
  35. Re:Might actually save knees... by ars · · Score: 1
    Actually they do have them, only they are used for remote access to things like radiocative materials.

    The glove tracks your hand, it's not exactly what you described, but if you increase the power on the remove part it is.

    I wouldn't want to support with my body the force one of these things can produce.

    --
    -Ariel
  36. Re:Kangaroo Commuter by chinoodle · · Score: 1

    Fair point, but these guys are already taking the train. And as much as I hate the shitty train service we get here in London, it is more 'eco-friendly' than driving.

    I'm not suggesting these guys are gonna be 'walking' all the way to work. :)

    --

    henry [ w i r e t r a p . n e t ]
  37. Hmmm.. by deefer · · Score: 3
    This could cheapen the Helium3 mining operation from the moon!!! You could leap 100m in a go! Better make sure they are properly fitted, though, or quite a few lunar miners could end up in the Sun...

    Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

    --

    Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

    1. Re:Hmmm.. by deefer · · Score: 1
      Actually, I was kidding, thanks.
      Humour sometimes depends on taking a false assumption and expanding on it, and the joke is we all understand the underlying premise is absurd, but imagine the assumption being real.
      You want a pissing contest on how 1337 you are at physics? Now _that's_ funny!
      Lighten up, dude! Drink a beer!!! Or even better, drag your skinny arse over here to London, and have a beer _with_ me! :)

      Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

      --

      Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

    2. Re:Hmmm.. by ColonBlow · · Score: 1

      You must be a hoot at parties. You would make a good Vulcan.

      --
      free online diet tracking.
    3. Re:Hmmm.. by kramer · · Score: 2

      Ever tried using a gas-powered engine with no atmosphere? Just won't work.

    4. Re:Hmmm.. by Signal+11 · · Score: 2

      That's not possible. The escape velocity for the moon is in the kilometers/second range (duh). Earth is alittle over 11 km/s. Besides, Newton's laws would make it impossible - first, where would you get the fuel, and second, what would it push against? Assuming these are regular shoes and not "rocket shoes" you'd need to push someone at several hundred Gs within a second to spring them into orbit. Strictly for the sake of arguement, you start turning into gelly around 30G's internally, with 10 considered the maximum safe speed. You can go faster for short bursts (under a second), but not any longer. Anyway, that aside, as your speed increased, so would the apparent weight of your space suit. It'd likely squish you under those kind of force anyway..

  38. Only in the US... by jalalski · · Score: 1
    ...would they be gas powered, the rest of the world considers them petrol powered.

    Did you know you have foreign readers? ;-}

    jalalski across the pond.

    --
    .sig available on 'Need To Know' basis only!
  39. Super Mario Bros. by maddogsparky · · Score: 1

    Didn't I see this a few years ago in a theater? Think of the possibilities for the military and law enforcement--or uses agains the military or law enforcement. I could just see a bunch of drug dealers getting their hands^h^h^h^h^hfeet on these!

    --
    science is a religion
  40. Re:Safety? by Vanders · · Score: 1

    Even worse, what if the Throtle jammed? You could be running for miles with these things.

    Now i have images of people being forcably propelled up a busy shopping street while screaming for help.

  41. Well that's special. by waterhouse · · Score: 1

    So, uh, what's the point? Are there applications for this other than trendy executive toy? I guess I could see moving faster being a benefit in an emergency response type situation but on the same hand the kind of bounding that the boots provide would be really dangerous around a large bad thing (like a fire).

    Maybe if they changed the fuel the boots could be used as an alternative to a car, but since they use gas (and how!) there isn't as much appeal. Am I missing something?

  42. Forget practicality! by Signal+11 · · Score: 5
    Well, gas powered equipment typically puts out a alot of heat, I suspect these aren't any different. So you have the heat production issue. On a hot day this could be a problem. So, using my previous overclocking experience, I added peltiers and an alternator to the shoes. I also strapped on a bunch of heatsinks and used heat pipes to extend the heatsinks up the side of my leg. It's now a boot instead of a shoe.

    So I was thinking, now that I have this alternator, how about I add a couple shoelights to them so people can see me at night? Not being one to be outdone, I used flourescent lights.. I'm environmentally friendly, afterall. Gotta add a ballast for that though. We could save on weight by running the wire up the side of the pants leg and back down the other, though I can't say I like the idea of 450v going by my precious jewels. But, in the name of science, I did it anyway. They work great too.

    So I have these peltier-cooled flourescent gas-powered walking boots. Doing all this required that I supercharge it to about 10psi and use a higher octane fuel. I got a great deal on peltiers though from Melcor, they're offering me volume discounts now. I painted them black 'cuz black looks cool. There's wires all around it, but that's the "in" thing now, so I'm not too worried. I added some fuses to the outside for easy replacement, as I've found the flourescent lights can overload the alternator and short when they first turn on. Should add a capacitor and a power inverter.

    You know, since I've got this nifty power source, I decided to make it wireless. Why not power up the shoes and make them walk to me in the morning? Forget the stupid dog! That'll require a bigger starter engine though 'cuz of all the electronics... Done.

    I also decided to add a computer heads-up display. We're using over 3000w of power right now, so I decided to go with a transmeta. Besides, heat production being what it is, a pentium would be too much. And I have to mount it on my chest now. I also added a belt-keyboard and mouse .. plus USB ports.

    Infrared would be good for tracking down lusers, so I've also integrated that into the HUD display. I don't know why people keep running away from me when I'm wearing my shoes (what's so bad about them?!) but now I can track them down. Hey, I'm getting a transmission on my wireless downlink....

    *cackle* We are the borg...

  43. There's a joke there somewhere by FascDot+Killed+My+Pr · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who finds it ironic that they are using a "foot-long piston" to power a "flat plate"? That what a shoe is already!
    --

    --
    Linux MAPI Server!
    http://www.openone.com/software/MailOne/
    (Exchange Migration HOWTO coming soon)
  44. One Word..... by kdgarris · · Score: 1

    Flubber!

  45. Re:I wonder what OS they control them with? by heliocentric · · Score: 1

    It would take a tremendous amount of bouncing to generate something like what you suggest... but if you could there would be a major thing to learn from it - what is at the center of the earth?

    I don't mean is it carmel or truffel, but liquid or solid? Eventhough there was "Journey to the Center of Earth" that didn't seem to help much. What has helped are major earthquakes on one side of the earth that can be measured on the other side in specific places, measure the time delay (and note any lack of sites to detect the quake) and ponder if the center of the earth is absorbing quakes or not...

    --
    Wheeeee
  46. Re:Helmets? by JordanH · · Score: 1
    Yeah, a helmet, of course, yeah, right... Put a propeller on the helmet and run it with gasoline too.

    Then, maybe you could get 30 feet to the jump. Might only be able to carry about 10 minutes worth of gas, but what the heck!?

    Hey, maybe you could coordinate the propeller pitch to apply more upward pull on your neck and back in order to help counteract those harsh bounces as the shoes push off.

    Yeah, a helmet is just the accessory for these...


    -Jordan Henderson

  47. What sudden takeoff? by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    It's not the landing I'm worried about, it's the sudden takeoff.
    You miss the point. The piston can push for several times the distance that a person's toes can. Even with the same forces (and same acceleration, F=ma), you can get a lot more energy (E=force*distance) and thus a lot more speed. The takeoff doesn't have to be sudden at all, it's just sustained a lot longer. If you're coming down again on what amounts to a collapsible stilt, so's the landing.
    --
    Ancient Goth: Someone who overthrew the Roman Empire.
    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
    1. Re:What sudden takeoff? by SciBoy · · Score: 1
      Well, you may very well be right. I'd have to try them on to be sure. But even with the same forces, as you say, an increase in energy is produced. This energy will have to be transferred to the rest of the body via the legs. However you look at it, it will be more strain on joints and muscles. If its a short sudden burst of speed, it will be a short but very sharp impulse, if its a long sustained accelleration, it will be a smaller strain in the joints but in a longer period of time. The net sum is of course not equal, the latter is much better than the first, but neither of them would probably be approved these days in any work environment. (Consider for example how long it would take before a work hazard controllant would shut down a plant where all the workers have to squat to do their work (no, I don't mean to take a sh*t :) )

      I know I'm probably stretching it a bit here (I just have to be right) but then again, people have gotten injuries from all kinds of activities you wouldn't think was harmful in any way.

      --
      "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
    2. Re:What sudden takeoff? by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2
      Energy is force times distance. As I mentioned before, if you can sustain a smaller force but over a much longer distance, you can impart more energy with less mechanical stress.

      I think you're confusing several concepts. Every step is a "short sudden burst" of energy, as you come down on a foot (arresting the downward velocity) and then spring off again on it (leaving with upward velocity). If the boots can make each step smoother, you can have less stress than walking normally. A burst of speed as in a sprint involves several steps; unless you have greater stress in one or more of them individually, you won't have greater stress overall.

      There don't seem to be any unusual postures or motions involved with using these boots, so I don't think the squatting analogy is relevant. When you push off with your shoe, the ground "pushes back". With the boots, there's an extensible mechanism that extends the push for a greater distance. Doesn't seem like a biggie.
      --
      Ancient Goth: Someone who overthrew the Roman Empire.

      --
      Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  48. Re:Helmets? by Coda · · Score: 2

    I don't care much about the actual topic you're mumbling about, but horrible arguments irritate me.

    Yes, car crashes result in a greater number of deaths, but that says nothing about the relative morality rates. Until you know how many deaths there are per car crash, taking into account the possibility for multiple passengers in cars, you cannot even begin to make an accurate statement about which is deadlier.

    Also, head-on collisions do not always result in the drivers head leaving a "bright red splat" on the windshield. If the driver is wearing a seatbelt and driving a car with airbags, they'll usually be bruised but intact. Motorcycles and bicycles lack the stability, mass, and enclosure of a car, and so head-on collisions usually result in the driver being flung over the handlebars, hence the need for a helmet.

    We don't mandate helmet laws for cars because cars already have mandated safety equipment: seat belts, airbags, impact tests, safety glass, et al. Motorcycles, bicycles, skateboards, and rollerblades don't have these safety measures, and so helments are necessary.

    Helmet advocates are obviously concerned with safety. Your fallacious logic can be equated with the statement "People fighting hunger aren't giving me food, and I'm hungry, so therefore they're not really interested in feeding people." I'm sure there's a fancy Latin name for this type of logical error, but the best English phrase for it is "bullshit." If you suspect alterior motives for their apparently altrustic desire to save lives, name them.

    If you don't want to wear a helment for aesthetic, political, or spiritual reasons, fine. Just don't attempt to justify it because something else people do is dangerous as well.

    --
    -- I can't think of anything witty to put here. Sorry.
  49. Re:Hmmm.. This IS possible anyway by marat · · Score: 1
    1. You can leave moon tangentially;
    2. Moon has no atmosphere preventing you from reaching ~1.3 km/s step by step (though you would need to move you legs really fast, but not often, I suppose).
  50. Moderate this up! (was:Let's ban 'em) by Anonymous+Covard · · Score: 1

    It's funny!

    --
    Information wants to be free -- but informants want to be paid.
  51. Wait by alleria · · Score: 1

    13 feet stride? Um, my strides are about 4 feet in length. 13 feet stride is the kind of thing needed only by Dennis Rodman and such.

  52. Re:mid-air turning? by Jebediah21 · · Score: 1

    hehe. I can just see some poor sap take a big step and hit a tree.

    On the serious side I see other issues with the particality of these shoes. First off: why use gasoline? Surely there are other forms of energy that would be safer and cheaper. As long as you are going think creatively you might as well do it in every aspect. Also, who is going to want to fill up at a gas station when their shoes run out of gas? Who is going to want to smell like car exhaust just to walk or run? These shoes seem like they would be much better with certain improvements.

    --

    Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
  53. Uhm... by limbostar · · Score: 2

    Nintendo made the Power Glove years ago.

    ...are you *sure* you want one?

    --
    this is a sig.
  54. Re:Gas Powered Shoes?? Uhh.. Think! by noreaga · · Score: 1

    I don't think he'll need many gallons, especially since he (hopefully) doesn't weigh as much as a full blown vehicle.

  55. What about muscle and tendon damage? by cfabe · · Score: 1

    What concerns me is what the effect would be if a piston fired when your weight was not over the foot that was firing. It seems quite likely that your leg would be shot up with a great force, as the firing boot would be expecting to have the weight of your entire body over it. Damage to leg muscles and the hamstring tendon seems possible. Maybe there would be some sensor to determine the force being applied to the sole of the boot and adjust the boost accordingly?

  56. Already been done - better... by MythoBeast · · Score: 2

    Have you seen Exerlopers?

    The original design of these things allowed for 30 foot strides(once you got going), and speeds that were considered too much of a liability for the company to sell. No gasoline, pistons, or even moving parts, just good old fasioned efficient engineering.

    Mythological Beast

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  57. Knees go out by SciBoy · · Score: 2
    What worries me is that they probably put a lot of extra pressure on joints, specially the knees, that they where not constructed for. Olympic sprinters train their muscles to take the added hits and jolts of running at 23mph.

    On the other hand, it says quite clearly that they're only supposed to be used for short periods of time (25 minutes was the gas limit) which hopfully will mean that people won't replace their bicycle with these shoes.

    --
    "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
  58. Re:lack of details by anatoli · · Score: 2

    AFAICT you're supposed to run, not walk, with these things...
    --

    --
    Industrial space for lease in Flatlandia.
  59. How lazy can we get??? by DShor · · Score: 1

    Step #1: Stairs are too hard to climb all the time.
    Step #2: Build escalators and elevators to make life easier.
    Step #3: Getting too fat because I'm no longer climbing stairs.
    Step #4: Build stairmaster to exercise.
    Step #5: Walking is too tiring.
    Step #6: Build cars.
    Step #7: Getting too fat because I'm no longer walking.
    Step #8: Build treadmill to exercise.
    Step #9: Still getting fat because of my computer (I don't want to leave the house).
    Step #10: Start jogging every morning for a half hour.
    Step #11: Too lazy to jog for a half hour.
    Step #12: Build gas powered shoes to jog same distance, in a shorter period of time.
    Step #13: Still getting fat because of laziness.
    Step #14: Diet pills...

    See where this is going?

    --


    Why is it that people always hear what I say, and not what I mean?
  60. Daddy Long Legs by Proteus578 · · Score: 1

    Go Go Gadget Legs!!!

  61. Re:Sport potential? by bunyip · · Score: 1

    This would clearly be fun. Can you imagine some petrol-head outfitting his shoes with little turbochargers and nitrous-oxide injection? As soon as you make it a sport, people will take it to extremes.

  62. If nothing else... by pingflood · · Score: 1
    ...at least it'll allow for some new, creative excuses when you're late for work; ``Uh, sorry, boss -- my shoes ran out of gas again.''

    -pf

  63. Re:Dangerous? by Refrag · · Score: 1

    You're missing the obvious fact that bicycles are still on the ground (most of the time) and have steering mechanisms.

    ...or are you thinking that air-control (as seen in Unreal Tournament) is real?

    Refrag

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
  64. The Picture by Seumas · · Score: 3
    Okay, so now we have the picture at the BBC to look at and, just as I imagined it would look, it's basically flat shoe-platforms with springs encased inside, and pistons along side your legs, strapped about your knee.

    The first thought that went through my mind when I saw this picture was "what a great way to have the lower part of your legs completely torn off from the rest of your body".
    ---
    seumas.com

  65. At least now I have an in-plot excuse by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Platform game hero(in)es all have superhuman jumping ability. This will only add to the immersion of new games' plots. (I'm writing a Contra clone called Against.)

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  66. Maybe it's been covered... by Perdition · · Score: 1

    but wasn't there some American tinkerer a few years back who developed a set of spring-powered "legs" you wore like a weird body-brace that let you run up to 30 m.p.h. and jump a six-foot standstill vertical? I forget where I saw it, but despite the ungainly pose, it looked like more fun than the Big Wheel. Now, gas-powered shoes you can keep, but if someone knows if any info on the spring-legs is (hopefully on the 'net), let me in on it.

    --
    Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
  67. Re:Helmets? by nstrug · · Score: 2
    Let me guess - you're one of those idiots on an YZF R-1 or a Hyabusa wearing no helment, no gloves, sneakers, t-shirt and shorts...I'd love to see one of those guys go for the big red smear.

    Funny thing is, most of these guys can't ride - check out the rear tire, usually about 2" of unscrubbed rubber on either side.

    Might as well be riding a Harley (fate worse then death)

    Nick

    --
    -- "It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park" - Jim Moran
  68. diesel pogo-stick by marvinglenn · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this is gonna affect the patent on my diesel powered pogo-stick.

    --
    The whores get mad when the sluts give it away for free.
  69. I've seen this before... by Dan+Jagnow · · Score: 1

    Go, go Gadget legs!

    --
    The heart has reasons that reason does not understand. - Jacques Bènigne Bossuet
  70. Re:Safety? by Helge+Hafting · · Score: 1
    Even worse, what if the Throtle jammed? You could be running for miles with these things.

    Now i have images of people being forcably propelled up a busy shopping street while screaming for help.

    They won't need to run like mad. Simply jump in place till you can turn off ignition.

  71. Re:mid-air turning? by GungaDan · · Score: 1

    control issues aside, it sounds kinda like a fun toy. and it should be a boon to the arthroscopy industry.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  72. SpringWalker by nedron · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, I think the SpringWalker looks like more fun (and safer).

    --


    * As is generally the case, my opinions do not reflect those of my employer.
  73. "Gas" is a liquid by PyRoNeRd · · Score: 1
    It baffles me to this day that Americans call petrol "gas".

    AFAIK "gas" is a liquid and not a gas.

  74. Re:Helmets? by peccary · · Score: 1

    http://www.magma.ca/~ocbc/nigel.html

    has an article from NZ. And there's this:

    Motorists get head start in drive for road safety

    From the Sydney Morning Herald, Tuesday 22nd September 1998

    By ROBERT WAINWRIGHT, Transport Writer

    First it was motorbike riders, cyclists and skateboarders - now motorists and their passengers are being encouraged to wear helmets. The move comes in the wake of a new study which claims that headwear can dramatically reduce brain injuries in road accidents.

    A report by the Federal Office of Road Safety claims that "bicycle-style" helmets would be as effective as airbags and better than seat belts, reducing the severity of accidents by 50 per cent and saving the life of one in five head-injury victims. The report, released yesterday with the backing of the Department of Transport and Regional Development, even suggested that protective headbands could be designed as a fashion accessory.

    It presents findings from a two-year study on head and brain injuries conducted jointly by the accident research units at the University of Adelaide and Monash University, which said head injuries were costing the economy more than $1.5 billion a year. The universities concluded that helmets would provide more protection than safety options such as interior padding, side-impact airbags and advanced seat belt designs. Full helmet protection would lessen the severity of more than 60 per cent of brain injuries, compared with a bicycle-style helmet (50 per cent) and better interior vehicle padding (30 per cent).

    A spokesman for the Office of Road Safety said the idea was being put forward only as a voluntary measure, and there were no plans to make it compulsory. "Car occupants are already better protected than cyclists or motorcyclists," the spokesman said. "But this research shows that safety could be improved quite a lot by using simple, low-cost protection. We are publishing these results so that the community can make an informed choice." Professor Jack McLean, from the University of Adelaide, said studies of head injuries found that specially designed headbands could offer a practical alternative to full helmets. "The proposed headbands would apply padding to the front and sides of the head, where most impacts occur," Professor McLean said. "They would be lighter, cooler and less bulky than a conventional helmet."

    Ms Pam Leicester, a behavioural scientist from the NRMA's Road Safety Department, said the idea had merit, but it would not be easy to persuade motorists to wear helmets. The report, which concluded that a helmet would have avoided one in five fatal accidents, will be given to Australian helmet designers and manufacturers.

    "A detailed analysis of head impact patterns ... suggests that specifically designedheadbands could provide a practical alternative to full helmets," it says. "With some imaginative designing, the headband might well be developed as a new fashion accessory."

  75. Re:Kangaroo Jumps by PyRoNeRd · · Score: 1
    Hmm, it looks like a copy of those Exerloper shoes. And they claim they patented the design.

    A clear case for a patents suit, it seems...

  76. Looney Tunes by MrDalliard · · Score: 1

    {meep meep!} I'm having this "acme jet boot" moment.... As worn by Wile e Coyote Watch out for that unexpected cliff or railway tunnel! {/meep meep!} M.

  77. mid-air turning? by TheTomcat · · Score: 5

    I'm sure this is going to sound stupid until you think about it. Remember playing playform scroller games? Like Super Mario Bros. The play control in the 'Mario' games was decent -- you could do things like adjust your trajectory in the middle of a jump or fall, but remember all those other games where it was impossible to move while not on the ground? Where if you jump forward, the direction buttons do nothing until you're back on the ground?

    Without a way to adjust your destination, mid-flight, wouldn't these things be incredibly dangerous? This would be somewhat like running on ice, or losing the brakes on your car while driving.

    Sure it's a cool idea, but is it practical?

  78. It's the Wrong Trousers! by slothdog · · Score: 1

    Does this remind anyone else of one of the Wallace and Gromit adventures?

  79. Probably another Hoax by Durrik · · Score: 1

    I've lost alot of faith in BBCs ability to report news. In the past few weeks we've had two reports linked from Slashdot from the BBC that were just pure crap:

    Microsoft moving to BC -- Apparently this story came from someone in the BC gov't (not the minister) talking to someone not in Redmond, and not associated with Microsoft about bussiness in BC. Yet the BBC reported it as Microsoft moving to BC.

    Hackers hack the space shuttle -- another BBC story. I don't remember anyone claiming that they did this, and the space shuttle is on a closed network, and NASA uses a pretty strong software development process that almost ensures a system that has a low probability of hacking. I believe a story on their development process was on slashdot recently.

    This is probably the BBC trying to get more hits on their website so they can get more ad money. And the BBC does like to play hoaxes on the public. I remember hearing of a story in the 70s when they reported (as an April Fool's joke) that the new library in some city in England was built upside down. They pull other hoaxes as well, that's just the one I remember right now.

    And besides this falls into one of those wacky inventions. It probably be as popular as those wacky inventions you see in all those black and white news movies. You know the self buttkicking machines, the face guard that rolls down like a shade to protect against grapefruit spray, and all the rest. And where did all these silly inventions go?

    --
    Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
  80. wind up by North · · Score: 1

    this has got to be a wind up...

    single strides of 13 feet

    i mean, that would hurt just a little don't you think.
    The whole concept is just stupid, and so many people have been duped into believing it, even at the BBC.


    ------------------

    1. Re:wind up by North · · Score: 1

      ooops, i'll try and close that tag next time.

      ------------------

  81. Re-inventing the wheel ... by (void*) · · Score: 2
    Professor Kunikov believes that, as well as being fun, the shoes could be used by rescue services to reach quickly areas inaccessible to vehicles with wheels.

    Hasn't he ever heard of the Pongo stick!!

  82. Wait for the upgrade by MupwI · · Score: 1

    I'm holding out for a decent pair of seven-league boots...

    --
    -- Bah weep grah nah weep nini bong
    1. Re:Wait for the upgrade by seldolivaw · · Score: 1

      Pratchett readers all :-)

  83. Re:Helmets? by Sarin · · Score: 1

    In my country (Holland) you have to wear a helmet on a motorcycle too, even the light ones > 49.9 cc. But you can avoid it driving a three of four wheeled motorcycle. You don't need a motor drivers licence for them either, just a card driverslicence is enough, because they are considered as convertibles or open cars. :)

    I guess this product is gonna cause confusing here for the lawmakers, as soon as I put on my future pair.


    Regards,

  84. Acme[1] engineering at its finest by EngrBohn · · Score: 4

    Just don't go after any roadrunners with them.
    [1]ACME= A Company that Makes Everything

    Christopher A. Bohn

    --
    cb
    Oooh! What does this button do!?
    1. Re:Acme[1] engineering at its finest by alecto · · Score: 1

      While their products sometimes didn't include sufficient safety instructions to prevent unfortunate coyote accidents, and they wouldn't survive in today's strict product liability environment, I take exception to the idea that ACME products were defective.

      Not only did the products perform as advertised, but the company offered fast, free delivery to the American Southwest!

      You can bet that next time I need a portable Evil Genius lab, some rocket powered roller skates, or even gas powered shoes, ACME will be my merchant of choice!

  85. What happens when one shoe runs outta gas .... by dustpuppy · · Score: 2
    I'm forseeing nasty accidents when one shoe runs out of gas and the other one keep going ... maybe that's how the Tasmanian Devil (from Bugs Bunny cartoons) got his trademark whirlwind spin going?!? :-)

  86. University home page by martin · · Score: 1

    at http://www.ugatu.ac.ru/ shows other work too..
    a levitating fighter plane (either that or those Russian pilots are real gooda low level flying).

    :-)

  87. Ouch! by clickety6 · · Score: 1
    Single strides are up to 13 feet long

    Unless your inside leg measurement is over 8 foot, that's gotta hurt!

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
  88. Engine trouble? by AlphaInsight · · Score: 1

    Geez, what happens if you throw a rod or blow a piston? It'd take your entire leg off. Also, if any of you have ever used the gas powered engines on model cars and airplanes and the such, you know those little suckers get really really hot. That diagram looks like that motor is barely an inch or two away from the leg, can we say OUCH!. One more thing and then I'll get off of my soapbox. How do you crank it up? I don't see a pullcord, or similar device anywhere.

  89. I love this bit... by seldolivaw · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    He also said he would continue to refine his product.
    "We aren't standing in one place," he said.

    ROFL...

  90. Re:ANTI TROLL SMACKS DOWN by CIHMaster · · Score: 1

    Suck it bang it rape it fuck it fuck you fuck me EAT SHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

  91. Think by SciBoy · · Score: 1

    Energy that has to travel up through your legs to set your body in motion.

    --
    "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
  92. Combustion by SciBoy · · Score: 1
    If you read the article (which I did a second time to confirm something that I now remembered) it says that stepping down, resets the piston, which injects fuel into the piston where a tiny spark-plug combusts it, propelling you up and forward (depending on your stance I guess). This hardly sounds like a "equal force sustained over a longer distance" situation but rather as a short, strong impulse to send you off. He (the constructor) also says: "A person can move with significant jumps or strides" which means that it's not a case of normal forces but rather extraordinary forces that send you off the ground.

    If it was the normal forces of a normal step over a longer distance you would not be able to jump higher, just take longer steps (faster).

    --
    "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
  93. Infantry Augmentation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    Given a more efficient powersource these things could be a first step (sorry) towards powered armoured infantry. Combine that with those contact lenses that give better than 20/20 vision, add some kind of targeting overlay for your rifle and powered augmentation for your gun arm - you have a soldier capable of running and jumping faster and higher than any human adversary, who can resolve and target hostiles like a cyborg and then hit them with the kind of ordinance you'd normally have to mount on a humvee. For some poor grunt meeting one of these guys on the battlefield it would be like an HPB with a 350 ping meeting a cabler with a ping of 30 :)

    I believe the technical term for the opponents of such a force is: "0wn3d".

  94. Haiku by havaloc · · Score: 1


    Gas powered footwear?
    Think about the problems of
    Really busted knees.


  95. I do think. Can you study? by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2
    Energy that has to travel up through your legs to set your body in motion.
    Once again, you're confusing energy and force. Energy is force times distance, and the only large movement during a boot-powered launch is in the boot pistons themselves. This is where the energy is being produced. The only thing that travels up the body is force. Force is also being transmitted through your body from your feet up to your scalp when you do no more than stand up. If you bounce up on your toes, you may be accelerating yourself at 2 or even 3 G's. I doubt that you would consider the forces to be excessive. Continue a 3 G push for a distance of a foot, and you'll fly an additional 2 feet into the air before you start to come down again. Same force, greater distance.
    This hardly sounds like a "equal force sustained over a longer distance" situation but rather as a short, strong impulse to send you off. He (the constructor) also says: "A person can move with significant jumps or strides" which means that it's not a case of normal forces but rather extraordinary forces that send you off the ground.

    If it was the normal forces of a normal step over a longer distance you would not be able to jump higher, just take longer steps

    If you're doing anything as energetic as skipping (let alone a trot or a run), you are spending some time flying through the air without either foot in contact with the ground. This is not a case of "extraordinary forces", it's quite normal.

    Now try to follow me here. If you accelerate upwards during a normal step (and you pretty much have to), you are pushing with a force greater than gravity. If you sustain this greater-than-gravity acceleration over a longer distance, you'll accelerate to a higher speed and achieve a greater altitude during the step. Double the distance, you'll go about double the height and 1.4 times the speed. Quadruple the distance, you get 4x the height and 2x the speed. This is all without increasing the forces involved (F=ma, E=Fd, v=sqrt(2E/m)).

    This is all first-semester physics. Haven't you studied it yet, or didn't you understand it well enough to apply it to problems that weren't on the tests?
    --
    Ancient Goth: Someone who overthrew the Roman Empire.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  96. Physics, eh? by SciBoy · · Score: 1
    I've studied physics for 6 years, so I know physics, OK? You explained yourself in your little essay exactly what I meant. Forces are transmittors of energy. You cannot apply a force to anything without also transferring energy. Energy is inheritly indestructible and the only way to transfer energy is by applying force of some kind. This is also rudimentary physics. I know you grasp this concept so I must conclude that you chose to refuse to understand what I said.

    While your explanation is quite sound, it still does not answer the main gist of my argument, that the piston is powered by a combustion. It's not a question of evenly pumping in air in a pneumatic piston, it's a small explosion. Does this sound like an even accelleration to you?

    Also, consider that even quite normal forces can easily damage your body if they are applied repeatedly and mechanically.

    Attacking me personally was quite unneccesary, specially since the fault was not with me or my argument. Energy is not automatically distributed in a system upon entering it, it must travel through it by use of forces, much as you state in your own post. I was not confusing anything, I was waiting for you to understand what I meant.

    What I'm saying is that the energy from the combustion is quickly transferred to the leg via the piston and quite violently "shoots" you off the ground. What I'd like from you now, is an explanation as to why you think this is not true. How is the combustion transferred so evenly to the leg?

    Lets consider the combustion an ideal one. I never liked thermodynamics much but let's take a look.

    p*V=n*R*T, this is the law of an ideal gas. The cylinder has an inside area of A and the piston's distance from the bottom of the cylinder is h. This gives us the force on the piston by the gas in the cylinder as F=p*A, where p=pressure (N/m^2). If we insert this into the formula, we get F*V/A=n*R*T => F*h=n*R*T => F=n*R*T/h. So, if we consider the time it takes for the fuel to combust much shorter than the time it takes for the piston to complete its cycle (not unreasonable) we get that the force on the body is inversely proportional to the length the piston has ejected. This means that we do indeed not have a uniform force working on the leg throughout the step but indeed that the force weakens. Note that h>0 (since the piston never reaches the bottom of the cylinder).

    Let's assume that the energy transferrance is 100% (not possible, there is a theoretical limit, but I don't care, because all my calculations so far are very idealised). Let the piston work over the length l, between x and x0. This give us the energy W=n*R*T*ln(x/x0). We see now also that the energy only increases logarithmically with the height of the cylinder. To make me jump straight up half a meter (a little less than two feet, and this is not counting where I am when the pistons are at rest before combustion) we need an energy of W=m*g*0.5 Nm. Together with our earlier formula we get n*R*T*ln(x/x0)=m*g*0.5. We assume that the piston is 1 foot long (in the article), that is 0.3m. We have n*R*T=m*g*0.5/ln(x/x0). We now assume that the expansion in the piston is isoterm (that the temperature doesn't change during the expansion). This might not be entirely right, but what the heck, I just want some rough numbers to work with here (or rather, prove that I know physics). This means that F*h=m*g*0.5/ln(x/x0). Lets examine F when h=x0, at the pistons lowest point. F=m*g*0.5/ln(x/x0)/x0. Let's say that x0=0.05m (5 cm), m=70kg and g=10m/s^2. F=70*10*0.5/ln(0.3/0.05)/0.05=12.5kN. This gives the same person an accelleration of 179m/s^2, which is about 18G.

    Considering that the combustion not is instantaneous, that the expansion is not isotermic, that energy transfer is not 100% and so on and so forth, I have proved very little else than that I do know physics and that this is tricky stuff.

    I apologize for any mistakes above, since I had to go through the calculation and change variables a few times.

    The main point of the calculation above was to prove that the force is not uniformly applied during the extension of the piston, that I think, at least is certain.

    The physics involved above is certainly not first semester physics.

    Hmm. Well. Seems you struck a soft spot there. :) Maybe I overdid it a bit...

    --
    "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
  97. Re:lack of details by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    How much gas refills do these shoes require per... hmmm say... kilometer

    If you read the BBC article, they give you enough to figure that out...roughly. The shoes allow a speed of 25 miles per hour. They say that the fuel last for "about 25 minutes".

    That gives a range of about 10.5 miles. Not all that good, actually. (Or a little over 17 Kilometers.)

    I suspect it would take a lot of practice... But I also suspect that once you got the hang of it, you could do pretty well.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  98. Re:I thought of this when I was 10 by ParisPrague · · Score: 1

    That's funny! Well I think that settles the market question...

  99. And you did it again... by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    I've studied physics for 6 years, so I know physics, OK?
    I don't believe you. I cannot conceive of an educational institution with 6 years' worth of courses in physics, not flunking somebody who persists in making such elementary mistakes as failing to distinguish statics from dynamics. I only bothered staying in the university environment a bit over half what you appear to be claiming, and... well, I'll let the results speak for themselves.
    Forces are transmittors of energy. You cannot apply a force to anything without also transferring energy.
    Wrong on both counts. When you stand up, a force equal to your weight is applied upwards against your feet. What energy is carried by this force? What's the rate at which you gain energy from this force (the power)?

    To be nit-picky, energy equals the integral of the dot-product of f and ds over the path s. If you don't have any motion, you don't have any energy transmitted. Excessive forces (even nominally static forces) exerted on a body can over-stress parts of it and cause damage, but a small force acting over a large distance will not cause overstress. Consider the amount of energy you acquire when you accelerate to highway speeds in a car. While the kinetic energy imparted is many times what you could attain by running, the acceleration is only a fraction of a G. The stresses on the body are less than you experience by standing up.

    While your explanation is quite sound, it still does not answer the main gist of my argument, that the piston is powered by a combustion. It's not a question of evenly pumping in air in a pneumatic piston, it's a small explosion. Does this sound like an even accelleration to you?
    ...
    What I'm saying is that the energy from the combustion is quickly transferred to the leg via the piston and quite violently "shoots" you off the ground. What I'd like from you now, is an explanation as to why you think this is not true. How is the combustion transferred so evenly to the leg?
    Ask the designers. If it were my design, I'd either have a low compression ratio to keep the peak forces down to a reasonable multiple of the average, or perhap separate the combustion chamber from the expansion piston and use a controllable valve between them to modulate the expansion. The Russians have been working on this concept for something like 20 years; they're bound to have figured out a few tricks.
    Lets consider the combustion an ideal one. I never liked thermodynamics much but let's take a look.
    I have no such prejudice against thermodynamics, so I'll be happy to expand on your numbers a bit.
    p*V=n*R*T, this is the law of an ideal gas.
    Actually, the isentropic adiabatic expansion of an ideal gas is described by the equation P*v^k = constant, where k is the ratio of the specific heats of the gas (the constant-pressure specific heat divided by the constant-volume specific heat). For typical combustion gases, k is between 1.27 and 1.3. Suppose I have a 2:1 expansion ratio (you assumed 6:1) and I want to average 2 G's of push over the 30 cm travel of the piston. Assuming k = 1.3 and v1 = 2*v0, P1 = P0 * 0.406. The average pressure over the travel is the integral from v0 to 2*v0 of C*v^(-1.3)*dv quantity divided by the delta volume (=v0) where C = P0*v0^(-1.3). Trying to simplify this without the benefit of being able to draw equations...

    (integral(v0 to 2*v0 of (Cv^(-1.3)dv))) / v0
    = (-10/3 C [(2v0)^(-0.3) - v0^(-0.3)]) / v0
    = 0.626 C v0^(-0.3) / v0 {now expand C}
    = 0.626 P0 v0^(1.3) v0^(-0.3) / v0 {combine and cancel v0 terms)
    = 0.626 P0

    So the peak thrust is only about 1/0.626 = 1.6 times the average thrust. For a 2-G average thrust, the peak would be a mere 3.2 G's. This would allow you to leap 60 cm in the air (1.2 times your figure) with a peak load of about 1/6 of what you calculated. If you were willing to take a 4.8 G peak acceleration, you could jump 90 cm. Being able to add energy equal to a 90 cm leap with every step would make running very, very easy. A 2:1 expansion ratio would make for a very inefficient engine, but efficiency does not appear to be the goal of the effort.

    In short, I think you need to work on your analysis a little bit. My degree is not in physics, plus I'm very rusty after not using this stuff for years, and I am still running rings around you. I suggest you go brush up on some of the basics.
    --
    Ancient Goth: Someone who overthrew the Roman Empire.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
    1. Re:And you did it again... by SciBoy · · Score: 1
      Hey, you're probably right. I haven't studied combustion theory and I've never liked thermodynamics. So you are running rings around me, but you're also not a very nice person, you keep attacking me personally, quite unneccesarily.

      I studied nuclear physics and quantum physics and most recently, solid state physics. Also, it is a masters degree which means that I studied a lot of things. The main direction being physics.

      When you are standing still, yes there is a force on your foot from below. But your body is exerting the exact same force on the ground, which means that the sum of forces is zero. Energy is only transmitted in an unstable system where the sum of forces is not zero. So, I am in fact right.

      If you're sitting down and then stand up, your legs will have the same energy, but your body will recieve energy from them because you are moving your body from a lower position to a higher one, recieving a higher potential energy. This illustrates quite clearly that the energy, kinetik or potential, of the legs is not the same as a kinetik or potential energy of the body (torso).

      Now, once again you touch on something I said in my earlier post, that we do not know enough about the invention to have this discussion. Since you have admitted this, maybe we can drop it now. I admit that you know more about combustion and thermodynamics than me (not very hard, I don't know much in those areas) and I admit that there could be a way that the shoes could be only mildly concussive.

      I'll be interested to see if you can admit that I could be right.

      --
      "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
    2. Re:And you did it again... by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2
      you're also not a very nice person, you keep attacking me personally, quite unneccesarily.
      What I meant to attack is your claim to authority, not you personally. Studying the chemistry of plant enzymes for 10 years doesn't make one an authority on petroleum refining either. And I would hope that someone with the education you claim to have would be able to examine your assumptions a bit more closely. An example:
      Energy is only transmitted in an unstable system where the sum of forces is not zero. So, I am in fact right.
      "Unstable system" is not a term I have seen used in kinetics, but I can offer what I think is a counterexample. Consider a brick being pulled by a string. The string is pulled by a winch, which is attached to a pylon in the ground (which is perfectly flat). The brick is being pulled at constant speed toward the winch. The pulling force of the string is exactly equal to the friction of the brick against the ground, so the sum of the forces is zero and brick does not accelerate. However, the string is STILL transmitting energy to the brick, which energy is converted to heat by friction against the ground.

      Still think you're right? I might agree, once you are finished writing down all your assumptions. For instance, I agree that your gas-piston example would probably be too stressful for people to endure. I do not agree that the assumptions in your example were necessary for such a device, so the conclusion you drew was not valid.

      I admit that there could be a way that the shoes could be only mildly concussive.
      It's nice of you to do that after I offered a method (a separate combustion chamber and regulating valves) that could eliminate the concussion entirely. I agree that neither of us knows the details of what the inventor is actually doing, but you should have sufficient knowledge and imagination to see what is within the realm of physical possibility. Your assumptions are too narrow to yield valid conclusions, and that's what I'm trying to hammer you into admitting (the hammer being a useful device for applying brief, large forces to objects which cannot be moved with the static force of one's muscles alone ;-).
      --
      Ancient Goth: Someone who overthrew the Roman Empire.
      --
      Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  100. Re:Dangerous? by plaa · · Score: 2

    What I'm wondering about is that if the pistons fire every time you land, how are you supposed to stop?!?

    --

    I doubt, therefore I may be.
  101. Today's topic is Rational Insanity by CIHMaster · · Score: 1

    The Dead Life is an oxymoron! Oh hell, lets get our gas powered shoes and just go jump around. (MOSH PIT!)

  102. Equation by SciBoy · · Score: 1

    P*v^k
    In your post you explain k. But what is P and v. I can't find your equation in my thermodynamics book, but I'm assuming you didn't pull it out of thin air and that it is applicable. I'm actually interested to know what it is.

    --
    "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
    1. Re:Equation by SciBoy · · Score: 1
      Upon some afterthought this is obviously P as in pressure and v as in volume, though where I learned thermodynamics we used small letters for pressure and large for volume. A simple point I know, but it is 8am here and I guess my physics don't work too well before breakfast.

      I did my whole calculation again and arrived at the new peak thrust of F=57kN (with your constants and your function pV^k=C.

      What I think is that without pen and paper and being able to discuss our calculations in person, we're not going to be able to resolve this satisfactory.

      --
      "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
  103. But what if... by curiosity · · Score: 1

    we had a beowulf cluster of these? We could stay in the HOV lane on I270 all the way to work.

  104. Go Go Gadget Shoes by freediver211 · · Score: 1

    Thats All I Have To Say!

  105. Hmmmmm aha by Highlordexecutioner · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one thinking go go gadget shoes here or what.

    --
    Where am I going and why am I in this handbasket?
  106. Gas Powered Shoes?? Uhh.. Think! by SirStanley · · Score: 1

    Heh.. Wow and I thought that walking around alot was a good way to beat having to pay 2$ a gallon at the Pump. I gotta gas power my shoes... *wonders how many miles to a gallon he can get with these things"

    --
    --------========+++Dont Feed The Lab Techs+++========--------
  107. Engineering idea... :) by idistrust · · Score: 1
    ...erm...get a car!! :P

    --

    --Ask a silly person, get a silly answer.

  108. Re:Kangaroo Commuter by -Harlequin- · · Score: 2

    >I already have a chuckle at the 'execs' on the commuter trains in the morning who wear rollerblades, and use those motor scooter things.

    Wow, I wish we had that sort of thing here. I'd applaud them. A few months ago I actually saw two consecutive cars carrying more than one lone occupant (admittedly it was the weekend rather than a weekday, so family trips were more comman and commuting to work less so, but anyway, it's not something you see everyday here...)

    Where was I - yeah, living here, every moron and his dog takes a car to get to work and back each day (one moron per car), and each day we choke on the smog. Then those same morons (successfully) petition the council to ban skating in parts of the city, and sneer at and stigmitise public transport as the "looser cruiser" that only people too poor to own a car would use.

    Salute those guys on their blades. The execs here are a far lesser breed.

  109. 007? by Meech · · Score: 1

    This sounds like it should be in the next Bond film...

  110. Russian Engineering by bguilliams · · Score: 1

    Excellent. The nation that still can't build a decent clock/radio is now moving to the next logical step past their duct-tape space station. I'm sure we'll be hearing a lot about this innovation in the future.

    --
    We must respect evil, and we must make evil respect us.
  111. uhmmm... How do you stop? by GodSpiral · · Score: 1

    >>
    What worries me is that they probably put a lot of extra pressure on joints, specially the knees, that they where not constructed for. Olympic sprinters train their muscles to take the added hits and jolts of running at 23mph.

    I'm sure the springs absorb much of the shock of landing.

    From the description, you make another step whenever your foot touches ground again. Are you supposed to land face first to stop?

    1. Re:uhmmm... How do you stop? by cybercyst · · Score: 1

      a switch on the belt, perhaps?

  112. Re:Yep. by FroMan · · Score: 1

    Army ants strap on large mechanical shoes and jump across rivers? So much for humans being the only advanced race out there?

    Isn't think kind of thing from Pinky and the Brain? Are you pondering the same thing I am pondering Pinky? I think so Brain, but this time you strap on the left motorized boot, and I will play Dr. Claw.

    Is that a crime to use two different cartoon jokes in one post?

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  113. I thought of this when I was 10 by ParisPrague · · Score: 1

    And only a 10-year-old would find it interesting.

    1. Re:I thought of this when I was 10 by JWRose · · Score: 1
      Actually, If I remember correctly, The Coyote ordered these from the Acme catalogue so he can catch the Road Runner. For some reason, though, the Coyote didn't have much luck with them. Hmmm, Maybe these engineers should have reviewed the Road Runner cartoons before doing this. Oh well!

      Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion.

      --

      blah blah blah....
  114. Re: Gas-Powered Shoes? by ozbird · · Score: 1

    Gives a whole new meaning to "jumpstarting"...

  115. Re:neh, just my uninformed thoughts on this.. by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2
    Slowly pushing against something (like with your legs) to get up would not be damaging because it's a smooth movement and doesn't jolt anything. Suddenly being shot off your feet by a large explosion in your shoes would certainly jolt something, and I sure wouldn't want to be in shoes like that.
    That's okay so far. What you really need to do is examine your assumptions and see if any of them are invalid, which would make the conclusion questionable. In other words, if you know that "If A and B, then C" is true but B turns out to be false, it's possible (but not proven) that C is false.
    You press your hand against your wrist slowly, and it doesn't hurt; you're just slowly applying pressure. Hit yourself on the wrist with your hand, and it may hurt, because you're rapidly applying pressure.
    Your peak pressure is probably higher, too. To analyze this requires some knowledge of momentum (momentum = force * time). If your hand presses against your wrist you have only the static force of your muscles applying pressure, but when your hand first builds up speed over some distance (and time) and then slams into your wrist it stops in a very short time, so the force must be large compared to what the muscles applied to get it moving. It's the same principle behind driving a nail with a hammer; you can't push a large nail directly with your hand, but your hand can impart momentum to the hammer over a large distance/time. That momentum can move the nail, but for a much shorter time (smaller time, larger force).

    Some things may be "common sense", but common sense is only valid for the areas where we have enough experience to have it trained to be correct. Outside those areas there's no substitute for checking the facts and doing the numbers. The other thing is, "Common sense ain't so common." -- Roy Rogers.

    I bet I'm wrong, but that's what I think.
    Not bad for fourteen. Take physics and calculus and chemistry when you get the chance, you'll find that a whole lot of things that used to be mysteries suddenly go together like pieces of a puzzle. There's a lot of stuff out there that needs to be looked at by people in a position of knowledge and with fresh viewpoints, and you may very well be someone to find an important insight that everyone else has missed. "If I have achieved so much, it is because I have stood on the shoulders of giants." Go climb up onto the shoulders of Newton and Laplace and Leibniz and Kelvin and Avogadro, and tell the world what you see.

    One more little thing while I'm pontificating. There are a lot of people out there who are pushing agendas, and they depend on the ignorance of the public (especially in science) to get people to believe them. Watch out for these people. The truth is their worst enemy.
    --
    Ancient Goth: Someone who overthrew the Roman Empire.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  116. Quote by Dungeon+Dweller · · Score: 2

    We aren't standing still. We're improving the product

    A rather thick pun if I do say so myself...

    --
    Eh...
  117. Kangaroo Commuter by chinoodle · · Score: 2

    This is great! I already have a chuckle at the 'execs' on the commuter trains in the morning who wear rollerblades, and use those motor scooter things. Now I get to watch them bounding down the platform too! Yay!

    I'm thinking tripwire here...

    --

    henry [ w i r e t r a p . n e t ]
  118. Hello by SciBoy · · Score: 1
    See here. Now you're being more reasonable, even though you're not admitting that I also could be right. We just don't know enough.

    I didn't claim any authority, and if it seemed like it, that was surely not my intention. My first post, from which all this stems, merely points out that I thought that perhaps the shoes could be damaging to the legs if used for a long time (which I also pointed out was not intended).

    Your example only illustrates what I said. You yourself say that energy is transmitted into the brick and also from the brick into the ground, by friction. Energy is transmitted. But also, in some sense, the energy is constant. The kinetik energy of the brick does not increase.

    If I use terms that seem unfamiliar to you, or even wrong, please consider that I am Swedish and that there is a certain language barrier here.

    Well, as much as I've enjoyed our discussion maybe we can put it to rest. You can have the last word if you wish. :) /Daniel

    --
    "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." - Ambrose Bierce (1842-1914)
    1. Re:Hello by Tau+Zero · · Score: 2
      Oh, from your other question: I was using P to be pressure, and v to be specific volume (volume / mass). In the thermo convention I learned, V would be the total volume (v * mass). Or maybe I have it reversed. When I go to a reference, I have no trouble picking it up from context.
      Now you're being more reasonable, even though you're not admitting that I also could be right. We just don't know enough.
      ...
      My first post, from which all this stems, merely points out that I thought that perhaps the shoes could be damaging to the legs if used for a long time (which I also pointed out was not intended).
      Heck, one can get repetitive-motion injuries and strains without any mechanical assistance whatsoever. That much I agree with 100%. However, I do not agree that injuries are a necessary or even likely consequence of using powered boots. That would depend entirely on the design and also the training of the users.

      Let's try an example of the possible here. I can leap a set of 4 stairs in a single step, unaided. This is a height of roughly 70 cm. If my leg bends to give 7.5 cm and my toes flex another 7.5 cm, that is a total stroke of 15 cm for the launch. That's an acceleration of nearly 5 G's. If I was using boots which were set to an acceleration of 4 G's (constant over the stroke), a 30 cm stroke would launch me upwards by an additional 1.2 meters. More to the point, the stresses imposed by the boots would be 20% less than the stresses from the single step I can already make.

      The combined height is 1.9 meters. That's a bit higher than my own height. Being able to take one step and leap onto something at the height of my own head... that sounds fun.
      --
      Ancient Goth: Someone who overthrew the Roman Empire.

      --
      Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  119. Safety? by ka9dgx · · Score: 2

    It seems to me that this is a great idea, but what if there is a mis-fire? I don't think I want to have something capable of lifting my weight go off at the wrong time, or with excessive force.
    It would be very nice to see a photo or diagram.
    --Mike--

    1. Re:Safety? by Fesh · · Score: 1
      "They're the wrong trousers, and they've gone wrong! Stop them, Gromit, stop them!!"


      --Fesh

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  120. Re:Insolent pest! by PanDuh · · Score: 1
    Hah! "Super-hero" or should I say: "Super-ZERO".

    Do you really think you can defeat me and my plans to take over the world with my army of giant, super-intelligent, green-glow-in-the-dark, insulin-producing, human-ear-backed, mutant mice?

    I, along with Microsoft's Legion of Evil Monkeys will crush you, Linux-boy!

    MuuaHaaaaHahahahaahahaahaha..hahe..ah.he..ahem.

  121. Hehehehhe =:-) by drenehtsral · · Score: 1

    Hehhehehehe =:-) That is a really funny idea =:-)

    --

    ---
    Play Six Pack Man. I
  122. kicking by provolone · · Score: 1

    can you imagine kicking someone with these ? not only the piston but the added wieght would be nice too

  123. This is old by SurfsUp · · Score: 1

    Maybe this concept is somehow improved, but ISTR hearing about the identical concept 5 or 10 years ago.
    --

    --
    Life's a bitch but somebody's gotta do it.
  124. Cops by Dark+Coder · · Score: 1

    Bad Boys, Bad Boys,
    watcha gonna do?
    watcha gonna do,
    when they leap for you!

  125. Re:I wonder what OS they control them with? by carlos_benj · · Score: 2
    Just picture it now, Win98 based piston boots.

    If it's Win98 you could just put the Ctrl, Alt and Delete keys on the sole of one shoe and re-"boot" every 26 feet.

    carlos

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  126. Gas-Powered Shoes? by Famy · · Score: 1

    In addition to fun, games and the potential for a new olympic sport. We have significant military, law enforcement, agricultural, environmental protection, and rescue opportunities for this one.

    --
    Ask, and it shall be given (to) you; Seek, and ye shall find; Knock, and it shall be opened unto you. For every one
  127. If you think that's engineering.... by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    One of the selling points of this concept is that a person on foot (with internal-combustion boots or not) can go places inaccessible by cars. Doing it at 20+ MPH is new.

    This invention has been in the pipeline for a long time; I remember reading about gas-powered boots many years ago. But it's not surprising that cheap microcontrollers and actuators are finally making them a reality.
    --
    Ancient Goth: Someone who overthrew the Roman Empire.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  128. An alternative to petrol by noreaga · · Score: 1

    If petrol-powered boots can eventually find their way into the markets of commercial and everyday use, perhaps it would be time for Roman Kunikov and his crew of aeronautical-engineers to consider alternatives to using petrol, such as using solar energy or even electrical energy. I would presume that solar power boots would overall be cheaper and more safer for the environment... Plus, I wouldn't want to be waiting in line to filler-up on my new, shiny Nike Sky Boots for $2.50 a tenth-gallon...

  129. Daikatana Mission Pack by jnderr · · Score: 1

    Sweet!, that's the missing link to my Daikatana mission pack. Watch out you little toads you have more to contend with than that gas powered glove!

  130. Shouldn't this story bear the "foot" icon? by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2

    And the fact that this is foodwear would only be one of the reasons...

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  131. Walk a mile by Tiny+Ant · · Score: 1

    These shoes would make it easy to "walk a mile in their shoes."

    Would be over so fast.

  132. Re:ANTI TROLL SCOFFS by CIHMaster · · Score: 1

    Stupid? YES! By all means, it was un-endingly stupid. One of those random outbursts you know. My mission has succeeded, you have been trolled, and now you're day is a little worse off :) Now shalt the wrath of the moderators engulf us all!

  133. Re:good for military application? by Timbley · · Score: 1

    I was thinking something similar, myself. Can you imagine infantry outfitted with these things? It would do wonders for city fighting -- jumping up to rooftops, surprise attacks from around corners, massive rapid deployment of ground troops. Tim

  134. Re:I'm having a flashback... by Fesh · · Score: 1
    Neat. How about this one?

    Holy Roman Empire, Batman!


    --Fesh

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  135. If anyone wants to buy these..... by Ertai · · Score: 1

    I've got a bridge in New York to sell you as well as a wormhole generator.

    --
    "There is no shot you can take that I cannot simply deny." - Ertai, wizard goalie
  136. Dangerous? by BrianW · · Score: 3

    What happens when someone runs into a wall or lamp post at 25MPH? Or worse, hits another pedestrian?

    1. Re:Dangerous? by cybercyst · · Score: 1

      hahaha i was thinking the same thing about the bear suit, a bear suit + gas shoes + recoiless rifle, and you have something tanks shoudl fear.

    2. Re:Dangerous? by Field+Marshall+Stack · · Score: 1
      What happens when someone runs into a wall or lamp post at 25MPH? Or worse, hits another pedestrian?
      Well, for one, when you're wearing these it's impossible to hit another pedestrian, since you're not a pedestrian yourself; you're in (wearing) a vehicle. As for what happens when you hit a wall or a pedestrian at 25MPH while you're running around with your powershoes, I'd expect it's the same as when you hit a wall or a pedestrian at 25MPH when you're on a bike. I'm sure it'd be painful, but it doesn't happen all that often. Myself, I'd wear a helmet if I was going to go running around in those things, but I'm a bit of a wuss.
      --
      "HORSE."
      --
      "HORSE."
      -Flaming Carrot
  137. Great! by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    Al Bundy would love those ;-)

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  138. Pun intended? by _vapor · · Score: 1
    I'm still chuckling at the boxed quote on the page:

    "We aren't standing still. We're improving the product."

    -- Professor Roman Kunikov

    Is this professor for real? :^D

    --
    www.poak.net
  139. Um, I'm wondering... by FreeJack1 · · Score: 3
    The one thing that comes to my mind when I read this; is there a tube that runs up into your arse and all you have to do is eat beans or corned beef and cabbage and you'll have a limitless supply of energy for the motor!

    "More beans, Mr. Taggart??"

  140. Funny, but. by Dungeon+Dweller · · Score: 1

    I would assume that they are solid state. I always wonder why people feel the need to throw an OS into equipment that works fine solid state as well... A little basic knowledge tells you that unless the software is really helping the system to work, solid state is a better way to go, faster, more efficient, less prone to breakdown.

    --
    Eh...
  141. who cares ... by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    But it's good to see (that some) Russians are as misguided as westerners.

    I can see doing this along the lines of "because it's there", but seriously, for capitalists posibilities, it hasn't got a *leg* to stand on.

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  142. This must look ridiculous... by Griff · · Score: 5

    It sounds like something I'd like to try (but probably only the once :)

    One question though - how do you stop? The BBC article says the pistons are triggered by the foot hitting the ground, so presumably once you have started you have to wait until the things run out of fuel.

    (This brings up another interesting question: What happens if your left foot runs out of fuel before your right foot? This would probably make for some painful accidents).

  143. Can I be a superhero now? by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 3

    Combine these shoes with the Ursus Mark VI armoured suit, arrive in your personal helicopter... from Slashdot, I can get the tech I need to become a superhero! Now all I need are some nifty superhero-style weapons!
    --

  144. Helmets? by The+Wing+Lover · · Score: 1

    I'm not allowed to ride my motorcycle at 25mph without a helmet, and there's a reason for that. There's no protection in case of a crash.

    Should something like this come into popularity, would we need to enforce a helmet rule? Hitting something at 25mph can be pretty deadly, and I can already see people in a hurry having accidents.

    --

    - In Capitalist America, law violates YOU!

  145. Sport potential? by Brother52 · · Score: 2

    I'd love to see that some sport competition! How about, say, motorized soccer?

  146. Military Powered Armor by Life+Blood · · Score: 2

    I'm wondering how long it will take for this idea to be incorporated into that DARPA powered armor project. These are definitely better than the kangaroo suit for increasing infantry movement.

    --

    So far I've gotten all my Karma from telling people they are wrong... :)

  147. Re:Grammar Man sniggers by CIHMaster · · Score: 1

    Well shit. You got me. You with the $1500 prize!! If it weren't for the fact that I don't care, i'd have called you an ass. Oh wait...

  148. umm... guys?... by Jafa · · Score: 1

    How do we stop?
    - Phil in Fandango

  149. Just nitpicking... by Dorph · · Score: 2
    The fastest sprinter at the Sydney Olympics will not surpass 37km/h (23 mph)

    The world record time for the 100m is about 10sec, which works out to 36km/h, but this is an average speed from a standing start. I don't know how long it takes to reach maximum speed, but when the runner crosses the finish line, he's moving a helluva lot faster than 37km/h. ISTR the fastest human land speed being >=64km/h.

  150. Ha. by Gray · · Score: 1

    Russian scientists are thinking of some really impressive ways to get headlines these days..

    Mess up a landing even slightly and find your right leg propelled in a direction the bones don't want to go.. Even if you did learn to nail the landing everytime, the impacts would be totally jarring. Think jumping off a second story roof with every step.. Ouch.

    A gas powered pogo stick would be as useful and safe, and someone did that ages ago.. I'll take a helicopter thanks..

  151. You laugh!! by jabber · · Score: 1

    Heinlein in spinning in his grave right now.

    Those damn Commies (once a Commie, always a Commie) ;) are making Starship Troopers a reality!! In fact, with the Bear Suit and a personal jet-pack a'la Fall Guy (you know the one), all you really need are Aliens style weapons and a bunch of tactical nukes, and we can go to war with another species!

    Bugs Mr. Rico! Zillions of 'em!!

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
  152. Can I go vertical ?!? by kunsan · · Score: 1

    If so, I can see the headlines now...
    " 5'10" Computer Geek makes a 360 degree slam
    dunk on Shaq"
    I can wish, can't I ;)

    --
    The facts expressed here belong to all, the opinions to me. The distinction between fact and opinion is yours to decide.
  153. Kangaroo Jumps by oojah · · Score: 2

    Why use petrol powered shoes? Take a look at this page to see something that probably won't get you to 25mph, but will certainly let you jump a fair bit. You won't run out of petrol either ;)

    http://www.kangoo-worldsite.com/home.htm

    On TV once, I saw some *immense* boots somebody made - they were based on a "dead big achilles tendon" princple. Lots of springs, lots and lots of jumping. I can't find any links about that mind.

    Pterol might be cool, but I reckon the Kangaroo boots are better ;)

    --
    Do you have any better hostages?
  154. Ahh... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 2
    >(San Jose), declares cars owned by the poorest
    >people who can LEAST afford to replace their
    >cars to be "gross polluters"

    So it's the *POOR* people who own those 12mpg Excursions and Surburbans and Land Rovers that out weigh/size my own car by a factor of at least three!!! Silly me; I thought it was rich yuppies buying those monsterocities.

    Funny thing... I happen to *LIKE* having clean, breathable air...

    I wouldn't mind at all having <20mpg vehicles off the road. Or at least get rid of the "gas guzzler" tax exemption for them, and make them submit to all the safety and efficency requirements of normal cars. And bump the threshold for a *car* to be considered a "gas guzzler" up to 20mpg as well.

    Come on people... we all knew beforehand that California has some of the toughest emissions laws around. Yet we choose to live here anyway. If you want to drive a beat up old junker that spews tons of smog every time you start it up, well, you knew beforehand that that's frowned upon in this state. (seems like there's a cultural exemption for old Volkswagons tho)

    john
    Resistance is NOT futile!!!

    Haiku:
    I am not a drone.
    Remove the collective if

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  155. Go Go Gadget Shoes! by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    <Sorry, couldn't resist...&gt

  156. Gas powered anything by jabber · · Score: 1

    At first glance this article reminded me of a gag gift my grandfather used to have.

    It was a gas powered cigarette lighter. It was actually a regular lighter, with a plastic tube that you were supposed to stick down your pants. Gas powered...

    I just had this vision of plastic tubes extending up from a pair of Nikes... No thanks, my sneakers smell bad enough as it is.

    --

    -- What you do today will cost you a day of your life.
  157. Might actually save knees... by Tau+Zero · · Score: 1
    The boots have what, about a 12" stroke? Force = energy / distance; if you have an extra foot of travel to soak up the impact of landing, it's not at all obvious to me that you'll have any increased forces (longer time, but perhaps even lower forces). The fuel supply is the least of it, 25 minutes is probably the endurance using tanks on the boots themselves. Consider the capacity of a canteen on the belt...

    The next question is, what does this enable? If average people can run at 25 MPH with these boots on (and presumably carrying a load), it looks like they could handle a suit of composite armor. All of a sudden the powered-armor-clad Mobile Infantry of Starship Troopers doesn't look so far-fetched.
    --
    Ancient Goth: Someone who overthrew the Roman Empire.

    --
    Time is Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once... the bitch.
  158. lack of details by mirko · · Score: 3
    It's a pity we don't have not only some pictures but also some ideas of the way it is supposed to work :
    • How much gas refills do these shoes require per... hmmm say... kilometer ?
    • If I understood properly, these shoes allow their wearer to just walk the same way but make his steps longer.
      • What if he wants to climb stairs down ?
      • Won't he just be thrown in the air ?
      • How is precision stepping handled ?
      (a typical French expression in this case is "Adorable mais si on danse?" - "Lovely, but what about dancing?")
    • Walking with one kg of shoe per feet can also not be as natural as the guy tries to describe it...
      Especially if you happen to be out of gas in a country that is known for its penuries...

    --
    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  159. I'm Outraged... by TheNecromancer · · Score: 1
    Well, I hope they're happy now, because our city sidewalks and parks will be clogged with pedestrians stranded with their broken-down shoes, probably because they ran out of gas, or they're waiting for a tow truck to take them to the nearest service station for repair.

    And I used to enjoy walking through the park!

    --
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
  160. Yep. by hey! · · Score: 3

    Professor Kunikov believes that,as well as being fun, the shoes could be used by rescue services to reach quickly areas inaccessible to vehicles with wheels.

    Yep. Same strategy as army ants use to cross rivers.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  161. I'm having a flashback... by fudboy · · Score: 3
    Yes, I'm having a flashback to the cold war. Aren't you guys afraid of what the Russian military could do with this technology?

    1. Bouncing Battallions of Bolshevics Batman!!!


    :)Fudboy

    I guess I'm just a Fudboy, looking for that real Transmeta...
    --

    :)Fudboy

    I guess I'm only a Fudboy, looking for that real Transmeta