Slashdot Mirror


Justin Frankel of Nullsoft Hacks AIM

Trinition writes "Justin Frankel from Nullsoft, the creators of WinAmp, as gone and hacked away at his new Parent Company's popular AIM service. He's remove the ads. Read the ZDNet article for details." Apparently AOL yanked it from the firehose page, but it's on Zeropaid.Update: 09/22 02:40 AM by H :Thanks to a couple people who pointed out that it is still on firehose.

168 comments

  1. NullSoft VS AOL... by nachoman · · Score: 3

    Personally I find this rather amusing. It seems that nullsoft is trying to cause as much trouble for AOL as possible. You will remember how gnutella was created and then removed by AOL and now this.

    I wonder if Frankel and other at nullsoft are trying to see how far AOL will allow them to go, or maybe they are just unhappy with their job at AOL. Most companies have you sign a non-disclosure agreement in regards to the software owned by the company. This would blatently infringe on this contract.

    Perhaps Frankel is doing this to get back at AOL for buying his company out (even though it made him rich). To me this course of action doesn't seem logical. It would be like a microsoft employee putting out a free version of a windows like operating system which he based on the windows code.

    1. Re:NullSoft VS AOL... by .milfox · · Score: 1

      Oh, speaking about M$ folks writing operating system stuff ..

      Check out www.geoshell.com, a GPL'd project that's a shell replacement for exploder.

      Yes, it's headed by a guy working for M$ (in his spare time, of course)

    2. Re:NullSoft VS AOL... by birder · · Score: 1

      How could you be bought out unless you wanted to sell? Nullsoft was just a couple of guys writing an mp3 player. AOL gave them millions of dollars (my understanding) for it. Personally, I don't see why he just doesn't walk away. Does AOL own Nullsoft/Winamp or do they own Frankel?

    3. Re:NullSoft VS AOL... by wolf- · · Score: 1

      In the current era of Extraodinarily Large companies, non-competition reaches into many areas of industry. Programmer for AOL, signing a general "you will not compete in any of our markets" can go work at McDonalds until AOL decides to buy that too. I hadn't realized until this moment, this other ramification of all the mergers we have seen recently.

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    4. Re:NullSoft VS AOL... by sik+puppy · · Score: 1

      you make him an offer he can't refuse

      if he really doesn't like aol that much, he can go do whatever he wants - 80+ mil is adequate to do almost anything

      the biggest problem is apt to be a "no compete" clause in the buyout - but again w/ that much cash...

      --
      The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers. Shakespeare, Henry VI, Part 2, Act 4, Scene 2
  2. And it works like a champ... by SpookComix · · Score: 1
    But honestly, it's something you would download and use if you just wanted to "stick it to AOL". IMHO, it's something you'd use out of principle, not practicality. Frankly, a visual spectrum is more annoying to have running on my screen than an occasional ad change.

    I think the whole concept is funny as hell, though. If he (or someone else) could write one that would show the name of the song being played, the time left, the artist, etc...that would be less annoying, and more useful.

    --SpookComix

    --
    You read fiction? I write it! Lemme know what you th
  3. AOL deserves it by judasimbus · · Score: 1

    I really don't see why anyone would have any sympathy towards AOL. These are the people who put advertisements in their properitary software that people pay $21.95 a month to use, a high price to pay for slow, unreliable 56k access. AOL just wants to bomard the world with advertisements in any way they can and their customers don't seem to care that they're paying to see advertisements. The worse is yet to come because the FCC seems to have given the green light for the AOL-Time Warner merger. It's going to be a AOL world as far as information goes.

  4. Re:What is the big deal with getting 1st post? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    Well, you can have the grits, grits, eggs, pancakes and grits. That hasn't got much grits in it.

    -David T. C.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  5. Re:Removing the ads by Phroggy · · Score: 1
    Are my Native American ancestors the figment of those "europeans" imaginations?

    If that.

    --

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  6. why should i have to have winamp? by Lx · · Score: 1

    Like I'm really gonna download that piece of junk and leave it running just to not see ads in AIM. I think having to look at it all the time is worse than seeing ads.

    -lx

  7. The AOL window. by NightmareDNS · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you guys, but I keep the damn thing minimized to the system tray.

    --
    NightmareDNS =)
  8. Re:What is the big deal with getting 1st post? by revbob · · Score: 2

    If ya didn't want grits, wha'd you order breakfast for?

  9. Re:What is the big deal with getting 1st post? by Abstract · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's time for a First Post section? Taco submits a story to it randomly, and whoever posts first, wins a point.

  10. Re:His "free*" time? by heller · · Score: 1

    The kicker is the "free time" part. Define "free time" when you're salaried. It was easy when I punched a clock. Now, it is really fuzzy...

    Not at all. Any time spent not at the office doing anything not explicitly asked of you by your employer is your "free time". This is a pretty easy definition.

    In this particular, the "not asked of him by his employer is pretty obvious", something tells me that AOL isn't going to ask him to write a clone of their software minus advertisements. So, the only thing left is, was it done at the "office".
    I'll make the guess that justin is really working to piss off AOL and would want to protect his ass, so it likely was really done at home during non work hours.

    ** Martin

  11. Holy wars by uriyan · · Score: 1

    I wish all of ./ers who can program would give their time to things like Nullsoft, and not like /dev/null soft. While I would prefer to have a full open-sourced client, crippling the AOL one seems like a nice job to me. Congrats, Justin!

  12. Re:Removing the ads (Mac version) by isaac_akira · · Score: 1

    yay! this one:

    http://jove.prohosti ng.com/~ieskins/other/AIM/AIM4.1AdHack.sit

    ...works great. it's a little patching app, so you don't even need to fire up ResEdit.

    - isaac =)

  13. Re:Still there..... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    I thought this was ZDNet! Man, I'm really confused.

    -David T. C.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  14. Re:His "free*" time? by deefer · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I've had contracts like that, as well - only from software houses, though.
    I can't see what right my employer has on _my_ code, written in _my_ free time, with _my_ compilers that _I_ bought (well, downloaded GCC, anyway...)
    I wonder how legal this actually is... OK, a contract is a contract, but "unfair contract" rules apply, over here in the UK, at least...

    Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

    --

    Strong data typing is for those with weak minds.

  15. Incorrect URL, Still Available to Download by rhughes · · Score: 1

    The URL in this story is incorrect. It is actually at http://www.firehose.net. (fireHOSE, not fireHOUSE) You can actually still download it here: http://www.firehose.net/free. Enjoy.

  16. Re:What is the big deal with getting 1st post? by Geccoman · · Score: 1

    Hey, I'm not a troll!

    I was just answering his question :)

    --
    I'm on a chair.
  17. Re:Thorn by ackthpt · · Score: 3

    Just goes to show what happens to the bloodflow from wearing a tie around the neck. :-)

    Maybe they could buy an ad on zeropaid ;-)


    It's all true! ±5%

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  18. Trolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Trolls .. they really whip the llama's ass!

  19. Removing the ads by Phroggy · · Score: 5
    He's not the first one to do this, ya know. Somebody posted the instructions in a chatroom about six months ago and I saved it in case I ever found myself running Windows and had a lot of free time on my hands (hasn't happened yet):

    Here's how you disable AIM Advertisements:

    Make sure AIM isn't running (not even the icon in the tray). Use notepad to open aim.odl. Scroll down to where there are two sections that have "advert" followed by "required". Remove the word required in both cases, and save the file. Now delete or rename your advert.ocm file (I renamed mine advert.bak). Now start AIM. When you sign on, no more annoying advertisements at the top of your buddy list.

    --

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    1. Re:Removing the ads by Phroggy · · Score: 1
      I'll assume that you got the allusion, or, do you only know it because they put it in a Matt Damon film?

      Actually it's because it was a Kevin Smith film; it's been awhile since I've seen Indiana Jones.

      --

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:Removing the ads by DeepThaw · · Score: 1

      It's actually from when they were on the zeppelin.

    3. Re:Removing the ads by Sylistron · · Score: 1

      Sweet! I always enjoy seeing big companies' ads get "misplaced" somehow!

  20. One of two things for certain... by mcrandello · · Score: 1

    There's either some real happy computer consultants out there for the extra business, or some real unhappy ones, that they either didn't have more banners up.

  21. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    Well, I'd like to point out to you , instead of Turing, you should really be comparing Jesus to Frank Sinatra. Sinatra is partially responsible for one of the best X-Files moments of all time, in the Christmas episode of two years ago, when his song 'Have Yourself a Merry Litte Christmas' played near the end. While he is not gay, I think we have to take into account that Sinatra actually has product, abeit indirectly, a much better Christmas episode then Jesus ever did. I agree with the rest of this, though.

    -David T. C.

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  22. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by dboyles · · Score: 1

    It's not "Stealing from AOL" any more than the UNIX clients are.

    Is using Tivo stealing? Is taping a show and fast-forwarding through the commercials stealing? Is changing the channel when a commercial comes on stealing? Is using junkbuster stealing?

    AOL created this protocol, along with the TiK TCL/Tk client, so people could create AIM clients for alternative OS's. NONE of these clients have ads. In fact, there is nothing in the protocol to grab/retrieve ads.

    Precisely. AOL is welcome to develop a UNIX AIM client. If they put some useful features in it, I can put up with the ads. I think part of the reason AOL allows UNIX clients to get by without ads is the following:

    1. UNIX users who use AIM are far, far, far outnumbers by Windows users.
    2. It costs money to prevent UNIX AIM users from using a service that doesn't show ads. In all liklihood that costs outweigh the benefits (see number 1 for a reason why).
    3. AOL probably doesn't want to alienate UNIX folks. Why? For one they probaby know that UNIX types will develop their own protocols, e.g. Jabber. Secondly, AOL and Netscape are buddies. It's been said that Netscape depends heavily on Mozilla. Who develops Mozilla? Right Virginia, UNIX folks (ok, not exclusively, but you know...). Thirdly, AOL really doesn't want to get people pissed at them with the impending Time-Warner deal.

    All of the above reasons boil down to one thing: it's in AOL's best interest to allow UNIX AIM development to continue.

    --
    -- "Complacency is a far more dangerous attitude than outrage." -Naomi Littlebear
  23. Re:Thorn by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1
    do you think that he cares? the guy got an 86 million dollar pay day... he's 21...

    Think about it... if someone gave you that much money, do you think that you'd give a damn about losing your job? I didnt think so.
    tagline

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
  24. Re:Removing the ads (Mac version) by CdotZinger · · Score: 1


    Go here:

    http://www.ResExcellence.com/user_cursors.shtml# AIM_EDIT

    Do what it says.

    --
    Your mouth is like Columbus Day.
  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. Re:Ummm. Yeah.. by RoscoHead · · Score: 1

    You claim that big business exploits technology to control individuals? How is exactly? Through ads?

    I dont find ads to be exploitive. I find ads to be annoying and often dumb, but never to the level of exploitation.


    Well, how about the tobacco companies deliberately targetting ads at teen-agers, to get the maximum mileage from them over their lifetime, even when they know the product's causing them harm?

    --

    Why is there only one Monopolies commission?
  27. Re:Its called sarcasm by acomj · · Score: 1

    ooops I replied to a anon coward.

  28. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by Paladin128 · · Score: 2

    Did you even read the artical? They don't make money fromt he ads. All the Ads are AOL advertizements. That's why they don't care if the alternative protocol doesn't have support.

    Also, the alternative protocol was NOT made to make up for the fact that the UNIX clients won't have ads. It was made for ease of development, and it actually has a few extra features, like saving/loading your buddy list on the AOL servers, rater than on the local machines. It's not specifically crippled, it's simply a version or two behind because less time is spent working on it. I should have been clearer in my earlier post.

    "Evil beware: I'm armed to the teeth and packing a hampster!"

    --
    Lex orandi, lex credendi.
  29. A better project for Justin to work on... by Nailer · · Score: 1

    That would be legitamite, and inflame more people than removing ads from AOL, would be to work on avifile [www.avifile.org].

    AviFile is a library, currently at 0.5, which can play a stack of Windows-only file formats, including MS MPEG 4, WMA and WMV, Intel Indeo, DivX ;-), and Cinepak. It uses about 50k of Wine code, the bare bones needed to support Windows codecs on Linux. The licensing agreements for most codecs seem to be liberal enough to make this legally OK. The 0.5 versions is quite useable.

    The current best player for AviFile is SMPEG XMMS, avaliable from
    ftp.xmms.org/xmms/plugins/smpeg-xmms/.

  30. Re:Thorn by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

    Course they could always sue him on the grounds that they paid him (bought the company) and he's intentionally damaging profits and attempting to damage their stock price. The SEC might be interested in locking his ass up for a bit as well.

  31. Begone ads! by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    When you're done with that, click on my homepage to get a small but effective ad-blocking host file.

  32. Re:The Perot Gambit by Uart · · Score: 2

    They paid Perot $700million to resign his seat on the board, sign a 5-year(?) non-compete, an agreement not to try to hostile takeover GM and they bought all of his shares.

    He should have held out for more.

    --

    Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
  33. Thorn by Refrag · · Score: 2

    It seems like AOL's recent buy-out of Nullsoft is turning out to be quite the thorn in their side. :)


    Refrag

    --
    I have a website. It's about Macs.
    1. Re:Thorn by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      Indeed. My friend coded one a few days ago. Didn't look all that difficult.

      Email me.
      Don't trust anyone over 90000.

      --

      +++ATH0
  34. Re:Ads, shmads.... by zephc · · Score: 2

    they have, its called Fire.app (search Softrak on stepwise.com for it). Its been around since at least the 1st few releases of Rhapsody. Also, I would just like to say that my friend Greg hacked the AIM for Mac client ages ago, removed the ads. One would think that it would be easy with Mac resource forks and all. unfortunately no, since AIM decompresses its code eac time it starts up (thats why its so damn slow on even the fastest Macs...its basically unstuffing/unzipping its own code). But yes, he removed it and it was nice to have an AIM client that didnt take up so much window realestate :) that was way back in the 1.x or 2.x versions tho

    ---

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  35. Thank God. by TheReverand · · Score: 5

    That .5" by .5" square was taking up valuable room which could be used for porn and UT and watching RIAA sanctioned DVD's.

    1. Re:Thank God. by zlite · · Score: 2

      Hee! Exactly. On my list of very irritating computer things, those tiny ads were pretty low. Is Justin just trying to prove that he wasn't a sell-out?

    2. Re:Thank God. by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Funny. But the space doesn't go away, BTW. It goes white and supposedly plays a visualization when audio is played with winamp. Cool hack. Even cooler because it thumbs his nose at AOL/TimeWarner.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    3. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you won't mind me putting an ad on your forhead then? I mean /you/ wouldn't even have to look at it. Maby I'll put a flashing annoying advert on your friends head so you can look at it. Only in a measly .5" by .5" square though...
      The point is software with advertisments has got to be the most annoying thing sence the fact that hotdog buns come in packs incompatable with hotdog's. So maby I /will/ use that desktop space for more pr0n. It is /my/ desktop I'll do what i want with it.

  36. Still there..... by slothdog · · Score: 5

    First off, it's firehose.net, not firehouse.net.... secondly, the software is still posted on the webpage, unless I'm hallucinating....

    http://www.firehose.net/free/aimazing/

  37. this could go three ways.. by photozz · · Score: 3

    1. He could get fired and sued.
    2. He could get promoted and told to "lay off" the special projects
    3. He could get "talked to" and fold like a napkin.

    Me, I'm guessing he gets promoted.

    --


    Dirty Pirate Hooker
  38. zdnet needs a spelling nazi by VAXGeek · · Score: 1

    Notise up at the top that it says "AOL's loose CANON". haha, funny ZDnet, they can't spell for beans.
    ------------
    a funny comment: 1 karma
    an insightful comment: 1 karma
    a good old-fashioned flame: priceless

    --
    this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
    1. Re:zdnet needs a spelling nazi by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

      Yeah, are they trying to make an allusion to Canon, the company that makes the BubbleJet printers, the EOS camera, and the color copiers? No, they probably were referring to a cannon, a very powerful long-range artillery piece.

      --
      "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
    2. Re:zdnet needs a spelling nazi by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

      Yeah, those priestly types can really get out of hand... ;)

      Oh, and BTW, your comment is a prime example of the pot calling the kettle black ;): "Notise up at..."

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

  39. Not at all what happened by edwdig · · Score: 1

    Mozilla.org was going to write a framework to support chatting within the browser. They created an API with which you could write plugins to support different protocols. All they released was the API for that framework. They might've released a plugin that let you use the Unix Talk protocol, but that's about it. They did not release anything at all that was directly related to AIM.

    1. Re:Not at all what happened by lordbrain · · Score: 1
      From what I recall hearing about all of this (which I recommend taking with a grain of salt due to the fact that I cannot find links to back all of this stuff up) was that this was to be a universial chat and instant messaging client, and Netscape gave mozilla.org the source code to AIM as a starting point. AOL quickly found out about this and in response Netscape pressured mozilla.org to pull the project. Please note, this is merely what I recall hearing about the situation.

      I will conciede that I was wrong regarding the actual release of the source code. This is thanks to the anonymous coward who posted a clever way you can still get to the original page, albeit not directly at http://www.mozilla.org/webtools/bonsai/cvsvie w2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&root =/cvsroot&subdir=mozilla-org/html/projec ts/chat&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&root=/cvsroot&file=i m-apispec.html&rev1=1.1&rev2=1.5

      But I do ask all of you to ponder this, why was the chat module pulled if Mozilla didn't have the source code? One reason could be that AOL didn't want to have their lead in instant messaging being undercut. But then again, AOL doesn't seem to mind that AIM and ICQ compete against each other.

      --

      Thank you. Thank you. Please no applause; just throw money
  40. Re:Economics 101: Loss Leaders by kubrick · · Score: 1

    my Win AIM client just put up an ad for th is page, which seems not to be an AOL site.

    pathfinder.com == Time

    Time == Time Warner

    Time Warner == AOL Time Warner

    okay, so I'm stretching things a bit (and I'm not sure if the merger is complete yet... :)

    btw, this doesn't affect your argument one way or the other, I'm just making the observation.

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  41. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by StillBlack · · Score: 1

    You're kidding right? Let me guess, he is evil for "Stealing" money from AOL. I'm not condoning stealing money from HUGE conglomerates. BUT... I won't be shedding a tear for AOL, or shaking my fist at "evil" programmers. Everything won't be free on net. I can accept that. But slapping an AD on everything that is free & having some bean counter justify it by saying there is a huge overhead for running his service is bogus. You can't possibly think a corporation of their size doesn't consider the cost of running a service before making it free. What changed in the last few years that would make the price of maintain the AIM service rise to the point where you now need to charge or run an AD. Did we loose a shipment of code; is OPEC also holding back bandwidth? What is it? Just my opinion.

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. --Bertrand Russell
  42. Re:His "free*" time? by Proteus · · Score: 3
    Define "free time" when you're salaried.

    Simply put, time spent using non-company resources is your "free time." For instance, if you go home and use a PC that you own to do anything, you own that work (unless the company has a claim to it otherwise [i.e. copyright, it started as a work project, etc]).

    Also, depending on the terms of your employment, there are "work hours" for which you get paid (even on salary). If you do non-work-related things outside of "work hours", that would be free time.

    Although I bet that some employers would see it differently.

    --

    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  43. hrm... not to be paranoid, but... by extar-bags · · Score: 1
    ...isn't it possible that the reason AOL isn't all that upset about this is because it requires AOL software to run? Not just AIM, i mean; its a WinAMP plugin.

    ----------

    --

    ----------
    "Rock over London... Rock on Chicago..." -Wesley Willis

  44. Not that big a deal by SrDrew · · Score: 1
    This isn't really anything new, there have been at least 2 other programs out there which completely remove the top and bottom ad bars (and cut off the slack space), the best one being "AIM Adjuster" (it doesn't work correctly with the new AIM released today (yet) but it works perfectly with all previous versions).

    There will always be a way to remove the ads from AIM, people were doing it (better) before Frankel and they will keep doing it regardless of what happens to him, only reason this is a story is cause the person writing the program is owned by AOL, not because it's anything new.

  45. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by NaughtyEddie · · Score: 1

    Yeah, in fact what the fsck's that box at the top of the Slashdot page? Come on, Capt Quesadilla, let's get rid of these evil advertisers.

    --

    --
    It's a .88 magnum -- it goes through schools.
    -- Danny Vermin
  46. It's my Moral Duty to read ads? by AndyL · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you, but just because someone has put an advertisement there doesn't mean I have to watch it. When I watch Farscape I shrink the window when an advertisement comes up. Am I stealing from Jim Henson? Or SciFi Network?

    I have no problem with them putting ads in the shows, but on the other hand they're not coming to strap me down and pry my eyes if I decide not to watch them either. And I think we'd be more then a little upset if the did.

    What if people just moved the window up a little so the ads were off-screen? Would that also constitute theft?

    1. Re:It's my Moral Duty to read ads? by Project_2501 · · Score: 1

      Nooooaah... its your moral duty to increase your bust. All together now!~! Weeeeeeeee must, we must, we must increase our bust! I cant hear you!! Louder! Come on now!! Weeeeeeeeee must, we must, we must increase our bust!! All right come again!! We must, we must, we must increase our bust!!! Thats the spirit!! We must, we must, we must increase our bust.. we must we must .....

  47. This is why AOL bought Nullsoft! by malasky · · Score: 2

    Perception: AOL is for dumb newbies, and AOL's IM client has annoying ads.

    So they buy Nullsoft, and get cool hacks like this. We love it, AOL loses nothing (those ads were worthless!), and AIM gets to bask in Winamp's reflected glory.

    Reflected glory!!

  48. Lion King Quote [off topic] by konala · · Score: 1
    Sorry moderators, but this is way off topic.

    Your sig should read:
    Rafiki: Aahh. Change is good.
    Simba: Yeah, but it's not easy.

    Just my few cents...or maybe more

    ~KONala ^..^

  49. HOSE not HOUSE. by seebs · · Score: 2

    firehose.net is what you're looking for. firehouse.net is a guy who does security consulting, mostly in a BSD context. A great guy, too. :) (I work with him sometimes.)

    He's getting about a hundred hits a minute off that bogus link. Luckily, he's not a Microsoft guy, or you'd have crashed his system. ;-)

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
  50. Re:Ummm. Yeah.. by Chris+Hind · · Score: 1

    A lot of the time, I think that ads don't have power over me. Then I get scared when I want a new pair of trainers and I don't like anything but the big-brand names. Ditto with soft-drinks: I will always buy the red one in preference to the one starting with "P" - even though I don't think they taste particularly different.

    All I'm trying to say is that ads are weird - really weird. They've tinkered with my mind a little. That doesn't make me immediately scream "horrible global capitalism!", but it does make me just a little wary.

    Of course, if you want real bug-eyed paranoia, read The Space Merchants and The Merchants' War by Pohl (& Kornbluth for the first). That's a recommendation BTW...

    --
    nal 11
  51. what's he trying to do? by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1

    Between this and Gnutella, it looks like Justin's trying to get himself fired. I guess he's not really happy at AOL.

  52. Re:The Perot Gambit by Vassily+Overveight · · Score: 3
    I was using a bit of humor since Frankel would probably continue to be a pain to AOL whether or not he was still associated with them. However, Perot really was paid off by GM just so they wouldn't have to listen to him any more. From here:

    Perot sold EDS in 1984 to General Motors for $2.5 billion. He retained ownership in the company, which made him GM's largest individual stockholder and a member of the board of directors. From the start, Perot and GM head Roger Smith quarreled, and Perot criticized the quality of GM automobiles. In 1986, GM bought out Perot's stock for $700 million with the agreement that he could not compete with EDS for three years. Perot ignored the agreement. Two years later, he started a new computer service company, Perot Systems, which operates in the United States and Europe.

    --

    "If I have seen further than other men, it is by stepping on their glasses." - Michael Swaine

  53. Re:Nullsoft rocks! by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    Hold your friends close, hold your enemies closer

    Intelligent: Pay these guys off and assign them something less damaging to their filthy aspirations of world domination
    Unintelligent: "Hey! You can't do that, you're fired!" - thus they go beyond the control of their might evil masters and really rip them.


    It's all true! ±5%

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  54. another example by Elby+23 · · Score: 1
    I think we, as a community, should spread news of these kind of activities as far and as wide as possible.

    This isn't as good of an example as something like DeCSS, but eventually, big business will have to notice that every new technology they come out with gets hacked.

    Eventually they will run out of Time, Will and PR to prosecute hobbyists. Eventually, this will help us retain our freedom.

    Think about it, if every protection method they make gets cracked just for fun, and they prosecute the hell out of everyone who participates, eventually the PR damage will be extensive.

    Large newspapers are noticably starting to slide towards the poor-little-napster angle in their articles.

    Keep it up!

    -lb

  55. AOL is not allowed to make money? by joshv · · Score: 3

    Come on, AOL offers a service, Instant Messenger, which costs them money to maintain and support, for free. The ads allow them to recoup some of their costs.

    How does stealing from AOL amount to someone being a 'programmer's hero'?

    When is everyone going to get it through their head that most of the services on the internet eventually will not, and cannot continue to be free. You will either have to pay hard cash, or pay with your eyeballs.

    -josh

    1. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by fonetik · · Score: 1

      Somehow I am reminded of Wally training ASOK in the dilbert comics. Good post. You get the point across, and still manage to have me thinking while trying to wipe the spittle off my monitor from laughing so hard.

      -fonetik

    2. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by Julian352 · · Score: 1
      The Unix clients are a very small niche of the total population of AIM software. If you would notice, AOL has not allowed any windows clients to connect to their services, even through the TiK/ToC protocol.

      There is a reason behind this, and it's called market share. AOL wants to control a greater market share, so that whenever it decides to come out w/ some way of making money off the client, most of the intended audience would get the ads.

      The geek population is not very good as an target audience, as it is very unlikely to use AOL's services beyond AIM, and are very likely to break any mechanism by which ads are delivered (filter out the site) destroying the revenue. Therefore, they are allowed to create their own clients, as long as they do not compete with the official one. (Once again, notice that there is no Windows clients that really work well)

    3. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by |n$ane · · Score: 1

      Yes it does cost them money to run AIM. I assume it also costs them money to run their ICQ servers. I dont see no ads in the official client there

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity. I *enjoy* it!
    4. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      Case send you a check to say that?

      I gave my pound of flesh already, now where's my donut?


      It's all true! ±5%

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by Chiasmus_ · · Score: 5

      How does stealing from AOL amount to someone being a 'programmer's hero'?

      Obviously, you haven't been on Slashdot very long, so let me explain things to you.

      Big corporations are evil because they are in the position of both controlling the government through financial leverage and the general population through employment and other more insidious dirty tricks such as advertising and control of the media and cultural brainwashing. Therefore, it is AOK to steal from big corporations. As King Missile once put it, "It's your duty as an oppressed worker to steal from your oppressor! Take stuff from work, and goof off on the company time!"

      Conversely, smart people are always heroic. Compare the works of Alan Turing to the works of Jesus. Who is more heroic? Why, Alan Turing, of course, because Jesus couldn't come up with a Universal Turing Machine (the basis for modern computer science) without some kind of Divine Intervention, which is cheating. Turing was also gay, but that only annoys the trolls, and there are little pieces of the "Secret Gospel of Jesus" which imply strongly that Jesus may also have been gay.

      Therefore, to use a favorite Slashdot analogy, various democracies around the world have been usurped by a giant multinational aristocracy, and only we (and Seattle anarchists) seem to understand this. Only Jedi Knights (l33t h4xx0rs) can bring this empire to its knees, with the aid of the force (l33t kernal h4xx0ring).

      In conclusion, the l33t 0-day work done on AOL's IM client is a minor victory for the forces of good, since, through raw brainpower alone, a guy we claim as our own (although he'd kick us in the teeth if we claimed him to his face) has taken a tiny bit of money and power from Steve Case, and given it back to the poor (by which I mean college nerds with fast computers), Robin Hood style (Ayn Rand can fuck herself).

      --
      "Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he deems himself your master."
    6. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      Maby so, but this plug in doeesn't move down to teh crippled protical, it uses the full, feature rich protical. I don't think this really elliminated the adds, more like covers them up. I *think* all it does is find out where the AIM window is, and draws over that part of the screen... It's not very tricky to do, you just need to make a few windows API calls to find the Window Class, get a window handle from it, then create a device context that overlaps that part of the screen. /me reads that last part and relizes that he scares himself.

    7. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      the first thing that comes to mind is the fact that i'm an aol user who uses aim (b/c the main aol prog has shitty IM capabilities), hence no need for me to see the ads.

      secondly, only people who don't have the understanding to install-let alone find this particular plug in -are the people who may even consider changing to aol, or adopting it as a service provider. For the rest of us, the ads are useless and i doubt aol will see any signifigant decrease in click-throughs

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by FrankNFurter · · Score: 1

      Moderate this post up, please.. 'tis the most hilarious and insightful post about the SlashdotZealotLinuxRulezEverythingElseSucks policy I've read in a long time

      --
      "Slashdot - the one place on the internet where guys brag about how small it is." - that IT girl
    9. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by Paladin128 · · Score: 5

      It's not "Stealing from AOL" any more than the UNIX clients are. The UNIX AIM clients (TiK, GAIM, KAIM, etc.) all use the TiK/ToC protocol, which was created by AOL as a slightly feature-crippled protocol (usually a version or so behind the normal one) that is easy to read/implement (it's passed over the wire as plain text). AOL created this protocol, along with the TiK TCL/Tk client, so people could create AIM clients for alternative OS's. NONE of these clients have ads. In fact, there is nothing in the protocol to grab/retrieve ads.

      "Evil beware: I'm armed to the teeth and packing a hampster!"

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    10. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by Evangelion · · Score: 1


      Consumers don't have an obligation to the corporations to act ethically with respect to them.

      If anything, they should be expected by default to get as much out of what the corporation is offering as possible, regardless of what the corporation wants.


      --

    11. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by Elby+23 · · Score: 2
      Actually, the ads are only for AOL internal services. That means that they don't get any direct revenue from using the ads.

      So how is this for a compromise - if you are contemplating buying the AOL service, you should leave the ads on, so it can constantly tempt you.

      If you're a hardcore zealot, like most of the people here, you were never going to buy AOL Access anyway, so you might as well turn the ads off. :)

      -lb

    12. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by Paladin128 · · Score: 2

      My philosophy on geting around ads and such (in services like AIM, NetZero, etc.) is that if you can, there's nothing wrong with it. If AOL wanted to detect the fact that I'm refusing to download ads, and kick me off, it's also thier right to do that. If I can't get around thier protective measures, or just don't care enough to try, good for them! If I can, good for me!

      "Evil beware: I'm armed to the teeth and packing a hampster!"

      --
      Lex orandi, lex credendi.
    13. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by gleam · · Score: 2

      Actually, GAIM has basic OSCAR support. Of course, when I'm in windows and I need to use aim, I don't bother with the windows client, I just use Quickbuddy (no ads, java, and actually fairly fast)

      get to it here:

      http://www.aol.com/aim/quickbuddy.html

      --
      this .sig is not a .sig.
    14. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by irksome · · Score: 1

      Right now, the ad that is displayed on my AIM is for ADP, a payroll service. I'm FAIRLY certain that ADP is not an AOL service. Since AOL does not seem to be the type of company who would give something away, I would guess that ADP has given them some money to have that ad there. So, AOL is getting direct revenue from these ads.

      -

    15. Re:AOL is not allowed to make money? by irksome · · Score: 1

      can't get much higher, it's at +5

      -

  56. some people have too much.... by acomj · · Score: 2

    some people have way way too much free time.

    This doesn't seem to make the product "Better" in anyway, just gets rid of the annoying ads that help pay for the AIM servers.

    Now if he could only get rid of those annoying ads that pay for slashdot.

    I'm truly underwhelmed.

    1. Re:some people have too much.... by boinger · · Score: 1

      Uh. junkbuster?

      --
      Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  57. Re:His "free*" time? by NaughtyEddie · · Score: 2
    You need to do what I always do. When you're at the interview stage, explain to your potential employers that you write software in your free time and that it has no value for them. Then they can add an amendment to your contract allowing you to do this sort of thing. You could even go in to your current boss and ask - asking doesn't hurt.

    The point about these sorts of contracts is to avoid you looking at all the employer's "trade secrets" and figuring out something really whizz-bang using them, and then setting up in direct competition. Many contracts forbid you setting up in direct competition (or working at the direct competition) within 6-12 months of leaving, too.

    But what you've got to remember about contracts is that (a) they're legally binding and (b) they are negotiable. Never forget (b) - it's your best friend.

    --

    --
    It's a .88 magnum -- it goes through schools.
    -- Danny Vermin
  58. What does AOL lose by having its ads blocked? by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 1

    All I ever see on AIM is ads for AOL itself. AIM itself could be considered one big AOL ad.

    So why have the ads at all?

    --Perianwyr Stormcrow

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  59. Re:Ads, shmads.... by NaughtyEddie · · Score: 1

    Linux unzips its own kernel, and that's not slow at all.

    --

    --
    It's a .88 magnum -- it goes through schools.
    -- Danny Vermin
  60. Re:written in his spare time by Skim123 · · Score: 3
    Man I wish I had his job, or his boss

    Or his $86 million dollars...

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  61. Re:AOL Rocks! by Fist+Prost · · Score: 2
    That comment reminds me of those glossy-eyed people in the AOL T.V. commercials. Especially the particularly glossy-eyed one who said;
    ...And the best part is that everyone else on AOL is _just_like_me_.
    Are you scared about the merger yet?


    Fist Prost

    "We're talking about a planet of helpdesks."
    --

    Fist Prost

    "We're talking about a planet of helpdesks."
    -Jaron Lanier
  62. Re:something for nothing by Elby+23 · · Score: 1
    Actually, AOL has released their protocol. You can write your own client to use it.

    There are dozens of legal, open source AIM clients.

    This is just somewhere in between creating your own client and using theirs. I don't see what the problem is.

    The code is running on your machine.

    -lb

  63. Re:Ads, shmads.... by zephc · · Score: 1

    yes but thats the ONLY things its doing at the time... its not running networking + havng a few dozen processes running :P

    ---

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  64. Re:easy way to remove ads from Windows AIM by dogbowl · · Score: 2

    I also got rid of that stupid news ticker with a couple of these:

    &nbsp ; load_ocm ticker

    now if I could only find a way to loose that search bar, I'd be happy

    --

    These pretzels are making me thirsty.
  65. Re:you need a spelling nazi by photozz · · Score: 1

    Notise
    ???

    --


    Dirty Pirate Hooker
  66. He's just trying to share mp3s... I just know it! by The+Other+Nate · · Score: 2
    This isn't Frankel's only escapade since becoming an AOL employee. In March, he and some Nullsoft colleagues wrote and posted Gnutella, a program similar to Napster that allows free trading of copyright music files over the Internet.

    They say next that they'll distribute this AIM program via WuFTP and Netscape, two programs that also allow free trading of copyright music files over the Internet. Those pirating bastards!

    I'm just trying to protect the artists!

    The Other Nate

    --
    The Other Nate

  67. protocol specs were already released - by jackDuhRipper · · Score: 1

    this was the start of the clusterfuck that is this whole AIM steaming shitpile: AOL published the spec a couple of years ago, then when clients started appearing that used it, AOL blocked them claiming "network security."

  68. Just Novell Instantme by Mark_Hopkins · · Score: 2

    Want AIM without ads in Windows? Just use Novell InstantME. http://www.novell.com/download/index.html

  69. AOL IM mac ad removal by paulschreiber · · Score: 2
    This isn't new -- there's been a way to remove ads from the Mac version of IM for ages.

    ResExcellence has the scoop.

    Paul

  70. It's still available on Nullsoft's page by suqur · · Score: 5
    You can still get the software right here:

    http://www.nullsoft.com/free/aimazing/

    Source code included! Apparently, AOL took it off of Firehouse, but forgot about Nullsoft's own website. Heh heh.

    And, just in case they take it off of that website, you can still get it (a slightly older version) from BetaNews, right here:

    http://fileforum.efront.com/d etail.php3?fid=968658671

    1. Re:It's still available on Nullsoft's page by Pontiac · · Score: 2

      Aimazing is still avaliable on Firehose in an unlisted directory.

      http://www.firehose.net/free
      Enjoy.. There's lots more Cool stuff in there for Free!(and not as in beer)

      Pontiac

      --
      If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
    2. Re:It's still available on Nullsoft's page by htmlboy · · Score: 2

      It's even still on firehose:

      http://www.firehose.net/free/aimazing/

      and i must say, it works very well :)

      chris

  71. Re:(sp?) by gaudior · · Score: 1

    The owls are not what they seem.
    --

  72. WSJ Article on AIMazing and Frankel by locksteele · · Score: 4
    Wall Street Journal reporter wrote about AIMazing this morning. Good overview, with this from AOL:

    "As for AOL, it says it isn't troubled by the software because it doesn't affect outside advertisers. The Instant Messenger box has two advertising spots, and right now they are being used to promote AOL's service. "Since AIM does not have [paid] ads, this is a moot point," says Tricia Primrose, an AOL spokeswoman."

    The article is available for free at MSNBC. Also, here's a screenshot from a link at Zeropaid.

    ==
    www.sitesherpa.com

  73. Deja vu by DeltaStorm · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall a great Nullsoft product being announced on /. then dying a horrible, horrible death... makes you think who's working for who...

    --
    .sdrawkcab si gis siht
  74. www.nullsoft.com by ProtectYaNeck · · Score: 1

    AIMazing and other useful binaries are available at www.nullsoft.com

  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. Re:Ads, shmads.... by NaughtyEddie · · Score: 1
    There is an element of that ;)

    What I mean though is that it shouldn't take much time to unzip AIM - AOL must have written really shoddy decompression code.

    --

    --
    It's a .88 magnum -- it goes through schools.
    -- Danny Vermin
  77. Re:(sp?) by amanb · · Score: 1

    neither has he *VERI*fied your speling.

  78. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  79. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  80. Re:Ads, shmads.... by zephc · · Score: 1

    well yeah, they werent concerned with efficiency, and i guess they just wrote their own compression code. they did it, im guessing, so ppl couldnt hack it up in ResEdit :(... bastards!

    ---

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  81. Re:This is hilarious from my standpoint by mcrandello · · Score: 1

    releasing the source might not be such a hot idea. Justin would face certain legal action, and any developers who managed to RE the protocol on their own would have to prove that they didn't use any code from AIM (I'm not sure what the status of leaked code would be, but wouldn't it still be copyrighted?). Besides, it wouldn't be as fun to write a compatible IM client with the stuff right there in front of you to work from, it would piss hem off much more to know that we did it without any help :-)

  82. Re:The Perot Gambit by prizog · · Score: 2

    Maybe AOL should just hire EDS. AOL is having a problem managing their programmers, and EDS has that cat herding ad...

    Cat herding: (http://www.adcritic.com/content/eds-cat-herders.h tml).

  83. For what it's worth... by bemis · · Score: 1

    I know the proverbial 'cat' is already out of the bag -- but AOL couldn't be *TOO* worried about this, otherwise i'm sure they would have pulled the software from the nullsoft homepage ... just a thought.

    bemis
    shut up dude! i'm trying to impress your mom!

  84. Re:This is hilarious from my standpoint by lordbrain · · Score: 5

    Actually, Mozilla.org released the API for AIM, but it got pulled soon afterward. Here is the page where it was and it tells why the API was pulled from the site.

    --

    Thank you. Thank you. Please no applause; just throw money
  85. His "free*" time? by Shotgun · · Score: 3

    I wonder about this, because the suits try to convince us annually that anything we create belongs to the company. All the employment contracts I've seen try to tie down developers so that the company gets first shot at anything they come up with. I don't know what his contract states, but how many of you working engineers could get away with releasing something to the public and then proclaiming that you did it on your free time?

    What is 'free' time when your on salary?

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    1. Re:His "free*" time? by Shotgun · · Score: 2

      I can't see what right my employer has on _my_ code, written in _my_ free time, with _my_

      The kicker is the "free time" part. Define "free time" when you're salaried. It was easy when I punched a clock. Now, it is really fuzzy...

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  86. hm... by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    A description of how to remove aim ads is available at my website at http://www.omlettesoft.com/impage.php3 with two caveats. One: everyone here has already described it. Two: everyone seems to ignore the fact that doing it places lots of weird menu items in your menu that look weird, but are mostly harmless but could scare you into thinking you did something wrong.

    But this isn't just about removing ads is it? it's about replacing it with the winamp oscilloscope. Whee.

    Netscape AIM has no ads, neither does Novell InstantME, but the latter is horribly unstable.

    As is mentioned on my home page, I have one burning question: who originally came up with the idea of removing aim ads? I'd love to speak to the guy/gal... Does that person want to remain anonymous?

    TiK (tik.sourceforge.net) has no ads and it's open source. kickass.
    --
    Peace,
    Lord Omlette
    ICQ# 77863057

    --
    [o]_O
  87. Netscape IM has no ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    THe instant messaging client integrated into netscape 6 also has no advertisements, and they are also a subdivision of AOL, so this isn't a big unique thing...

  88. The Perot Gambit by Vassily+Overveight · · Score: 4

    AOL must be regretting getting Frankel on board the way General Motors came to regret ending up with Ross Perot after acquiring EDS. Maybe Frankel is pursuing the same strategy; GM finally paid Perot huge bucks just to go the hell away and stop making their lives miserable.

    --

    "If I have seen further than other men, it is by stepping on their glasses." - Michael Swaine

    1. Re:The Perot Gambit by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      >GM finally paid Perot huge bucks just to go the hell away

      Really? Seriously, I didn't know that's what happened. Thought I remembered he resigned about the time he decided to run for president to avoid 'conflicts', whatever that means. Interesting that be was bought off by GM to leave. Any links to back that up? I'm curious.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  89. noads.slashdot.com by gimp999 · · Score: 1

    Well, I guess we can hope anyways..

  90. (sp?) by |guillaume| · · Score: 1

    Hemos has not verify the submitter spelling

    --

    give me all your garmonbozia

  91. Didn't just remove the ads by mwalker · · Score: 5

    He didn't just pull the adspace out, he lets you replace the adspace with an oscilloscope from the winamp mp3 you're currently playing. less of a hack than an overlay.

    but he does seem to be a 6 million dollar loose cannon. more proof to time warner that the truly gifted are beyond their control?

    perhaps.

  92. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  93. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  94. Only works for the Mac, but thanks! by GregWalrath · · Score: 1

    I'll try it at home tonight.

  95. Re:first off, use a better chat. by Phroggy · · Score: 1
    Why use AIM or ICQ when IRC is far better chat.

    Becuase AIM is infinitely more secure, and has a much different user base. Most of the people I know who use ICQ or IRC, that I'm actually interested in talking to, also have AIM; the reverse is not true. ICQ and IRC have historically been open to security holes, while AIM has been very secure - you can't even get my IP address if I don't want you to have it.

    --

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  96. Re:When will corps learn information cant be stopp by Andrej+Marjan · · Score: 1

    Who killed Kennedy? :)
    --
    Change is inevitable.

    --
    Change is inevitable.
    Progress is not.
  97. remove_ads.c by llzackll · · Score: 2
    Blah, this isnt very hard. Anybody with little knowledge of the windows api can remove the ads. This took about 5 minutes to write, and should work on any recent version of AIM. Ok, so you'll have to run this every time you run AIM, oh well.

    /* begin remove_ads.c */

    #include <windows.h>

    int main(){

    HWND BudWin, AIMad1, AIMad2;
    BOOL ret;

    BudWin = FindWindow("_Oscar_BuddyListWin",NULL);
    AIMad1 = FindWindowEx(BudWin,NULL,"WndAte32Class","AteWindo w");
    AIMad2 = FindWindowEx(BudWin,AIMad1,"WndAte32Class","AteWin dow");

    ret = ShowWindow(AIMad1,SW_HIDE);
    ret = ShowWindow(AIMad2,SW_HIDE);

    return 0;
    }

    /* end remove_ads.c */

    Actually, it took longer to format the damn html than to write this. What the hell did slashdot do to the <pre> tag? err.

  98. This is hardly new... by Millennium · · Score: 2

    People have been taking the ads out of the Mac version for quite some time, no code required.

    The oscilloscope is, admittedly, a new thing. But I could do that before with a WinAmp plugin (if I used WinAmp, anyway, which I don't).

    But geez; first Gnutella and now this. Is this guy trying to make his bosses mad?

    Incidentally, AIM has no paid ads; the only ads there advertise AOL's own stuff. So he hasn't damaged revenues at all, since the ads don't pay for anything AOL does.
    ----------

  99. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  100. Justin Frankel is now officially my Hero by abe+ferlman · · Score: 1
    oh my god, that's so cool. It's even corporate-justifiable since Winamp is an AOL-Time-Warner-Brothers-Netscape-Nullsoft-CNN-You rMama.com product. Wow.

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
  101. Not good for Nullsoft? by webrunner · · Score: 1

    I'd think that they'd be on pretty shaky ground with their superiors after Gnutella came to be... i doubt the AOL higher ups like this stunt either
    ----

    --
    ADVENTURERS! - ANTIHERO FOR HIRE - CARDMASTER CONFLICT
  102. dont' u guys get it !!!!! by n3m6 · · Score: 2


    he replaced the AOL ad with a _winamp_ad_ !!

    and it's promoting both winamp and AOL instead of just AOL..
    so like everybody is still happy..
    no wonder they let him do it.. :)

  103. Economics 101: Loss Leaders by KingJawa · · Score: 5

    It's much easier to reply to the parent than to all the "but they are only aol ads" or "but they allow free *nix clients" or other people objecting to this post, so, I am.

    I bring you a dictionary definition:

    loss leader (lôs ldr) -- n. -- A commodity offered especially by a retail store at cost or below cost to attract customers.

    AIM is, in a sense, a loss leader. They provide the service free of charge in order to get more people using the service. The ads may be only AOL ads, but they do get money when someone signs up.

    AIM has another loss leaderish aspect. "Look how good this product is, and imagine how great the whole service must be!" Sure, that doesn't apply to the TiK using group (and other flavors), but it does to the geek's friends. (I'll refrain from posting the definition of "friend.") One doesn't lose the ability to "talk" with TiK using buddies when they sign up for AOL.

    Oh, and my Win AIM client just put up an ad for th is page, which seems not to be an AOL site. But that has nothing to do with the idea of AIM being a loss leader.

  104. OT: Get This Shit Right! by Platinum+Dragon · · Score: 1

    and watching RIAA sanctioned DVD's.

    AAAAAAAAAAAAGH!!!!!

    MPAA! MPAA! Say MPAA, bobdammit!

    RIAA is the music industry cartel. MPAA is the movie industry cartel. RIAA hates Napster and MP3. MPAA hates DeCSS and css-auth. This shit's related, but it's not hard to discern.

    I'm about this close to producing a mini-FAQ on copyright battles just so people no longer have an excuse to screw this up.

    *exhales*...all better now.
    -------------

    --

    Someday, you're going to die. Get over it.
    1. Re:OT: Get This Shit Right! by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      If the women don't find you (+1, Interesting), they might as well find you (+1, Informative).

      Red Green kicks Ass!

  105. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  106. AIMazing still up by conraduno · · Score: 1

    Check the nullsoft website. It's still there.

    // Ian Shaughnessy

  107. This is hilarious from my standpoint by AFCArchvile · · Score: 1

    I see it this way: Frankel gets bought by AOL, and AOL puts its restrictions on him. So, in retaliation, he tweaks with AIM to get the ads out! Now all that he needs to do to achieve the coup de Case is to release the source code/protocol details of AIM! The open source crowd would love that!

    --
    "Ancillary does not mean you get to rule the world." --U.S. Circuit Judge Harry Edwards, speaking to the FCC's lawyer
  108. Nullsoft rocks! by eshaft · · Score: 1
    First gnutella, now this... what is AOL gonna do with these guys?

    Hopefully, let them be..

    --
    lf.o
  109. what I find scary... by w00ly_mammoth · · Score: 2

    is the fact that so many on /. are such l33t hax0rs and have an intimate knowledge of AOL instant messenger, that they know of multiple ways to hack it.

    w/m

  110. Argh! by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

    Argh! again. Nullsoft bought themselves back from AOL after a month or two from the time they were bought. Of course no one remembers this except me... Guess I'm the only one that bothered to visit the winamp main page back then...

    --
    we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  111. nt 4.0 by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 1

    dies horribly with winnt 4.0sp6 workstation

    ^^;;
    --
    Peace,
    Lord Omlette
    ICQ# 77863057

    --
    [o]_O
  112. A suggestion for Justin Frankel: by Erik+Fish · · Score: 1


    Why not write a patch for WinAmp that enables writing MP3 streams to disk?

    I was severly pissed off the day I wanted to save the stream from an interview conducted live on a college radio station and found out at the last minute that post-AOL-buyout versions of WinAmp can't do this due to the "potential for copyright violations".

  113. Re:Try protecting your country now by The+Other+Nate · · Score: 1
    I can't quite figure out what you mean. The only thing I can guess is that you didn't pick up on the intended sarcasm. If this is not the case, then I sure can't figure out what advertisments or mp3's have to due with a 16 year old cracker.

    --
    The Other Nate

  114. Re:another program by Priam · · Score: 1

    This program does not resize correctly on my machine. Know of anything else that's similar?

  115. Better watch out, Justin Frankel by Froid · · Score: 3

    This software could be considered a circumvention-mechanism under the DMCA, violating AOL's intellectual-property rights to its ads. I'd be very wary, if I were Justin Frankel.

    1. Re:Better watch out, Justin Frankel by WNight · · Score: 2

      What is it gaining access to?

      The DMCA is the DM-Copyright-A, if a copyright violation is not occuring or about to occur, it's likely the DMCA isn't involved.

      Yes, the DMCA is a festering example of bribe money and buying corrupt judges, but that doesn't mean it's accurate here.

      (Corrupt judges? Kaplan was bought and paid for.)

    2. Re:Better watch out, Justin Frankel by jallen02 · · Score: 1

      If I wanted to provide a useful utility to the world and did not feel like getting in trouble.. I would see to it that it is distirbuted anonymously so that people could propogate it and it would never die.

      If I felt like making a statement and boasting about my name and pushing my name around so more people knew who I was.. id release it with my name..

      Now then what has Mr. Frankel done? AHA, his anme is ALL over this.. obviosuly hes pushing his agenda along with this neat hack.. so these kind of things are cool but hes trying to make a statement? or something.. whatever his agenda is.

      Jeremy

  116. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  117. Nobody cared? Bullshit by duke_trinity · · Score: 1

    Frankel is a loose cannon. If I tried any of the shit he's pulled I'd get administrated out of existance... relegated to my very own special "R&D Broom Closet" in the company's sub-basement.

    They deep-sixed Gnutella and weren't enthused that he'd done it on their tab. Now their own software is being taken appart by one of their own. He should concentrate on integrating their toys with WinAmp to make a suite of apps and compete with ICQ, ultimately a better program than AIM anyway. I'm a big fan of Justin's but I'm not impressed with his latest innovation and I doubt that AOL's uppers are in love with him right now either.

    The moral of the story: If he'd messed around with a revenue generator he would be clearing out his desk now instead of laughing about these latest headlines with his buddies at the pub... after a point the mangement stops caring about how smart you are and fires your ass.
    -Duke

  118. What he did is pretty simple (more) by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 1

    Just from peeking over the shoulder of my friend time after time, I can speculate that what he did was this:

    When the plugin (it REALLY is a plugin, not an ad remover) is loaded, it finds out what the parent hwin of AIM is, goes through it's resource list and gets the hwin handle for the ad boxes. It whites them out initially. When you turn on winamp, it simply paints the vu meter/o-scope to the hijacked hwins. It also probably updates AIM's resource list with a couple of invisible hwins (I don't know if MS has a null hwin).

    It's not as hard or as cynical as a lot of people have posed.

    'Bogus

  119. another program by White+Shadow · · Score: 4

    Here's another program that actually hides the ads (resizes your aim window smaller). It's also open sourced.

    win32aimad

  120. I'm not taking any chances by JCCyC · · Score: 1

    I mirrored the thing already. Check my sig.

  121. Official AIM on Linux by Cato · · Score: 2

    Actually, AOL has ported their normal AIM client to Linux - it's available in beta, and works OK though I reverted to Gaim for reasons I can't remember any more...

    Yahoo Messenger is also available on Linux as well - quite weird having these official versions coming out...

  122. Wrong URL by davidu · · Score: 2


    It isn't Firehouse, it is FireHOSE.net

    The software can be found at Firehose.net/free

    -Davidu

    --

    # Hack the planet, it's important.
  123. 31337 by cvillopillil · · Score: 1

    It makes him a 31337 haxor.

    --
    no sig
  124. Chewing the Hand that Feeds You by d.valued · · Score: 1

    Nothing like bringing down the One True Evil Way- The Next Generation (tm) from the inside.

    Salute, Justin!

    --
    I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
    Real life is underrated.
  125. Re:What is the big deal with getting 1st post? by Geccoman · · Score: 4

    There's a contest here on Slashdot. Every time you get a first post, it sends an e-mail to CmdrTaco. He tabulates all of the first posts every week and if you win, you get a point. At the end of the contest, the person with the most points wins a bowl of hot grits, signed by CmdrTaco himself! If you get 100 first posts, Natalie Portman personally pours the hot grits down your pants!

    --
    I'm on a chair.
  126. written in his spare time by cluge · · Score: 2

    Like that "written in his spare time" comment. Almost all "spare time" progects I've seen were written during work hours. Man I wish I had his job, or his boss.

    --
    "Science is about ego as much as it is about discovery and truth " - I said it, so sue me.
  127. Download.com by bemis · · Score: 1

    Just a sidenote -- just noticed that this made the "download spotlight" spot on the front page of download.com . guess it aint to big deal...
    bemis
    -my shadow ran away again!

  128. Plug-in not removed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    The url was not firehouse.net but firehose.net and the plugin is available freely at firehose.net/free/ or nullsoft.com/free/ no one knows how to read these days.