Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Mods, Books, Checkmate

Slashback tonight with more book reviews, more on the Human vs. Machine Duel in the Desert, more on the Star Wars sequel name -- just generally more.

Quick, Danny, write faster! Danny Yee has written additional reviews of Jessica Litman's Digital Copyright , Naomi Klein's No Logo , and John Sundman's Acts of the Apostles . (You might want to flashback to earlier reviews of these by Michael Sims and Jon Katz, Warren A. Layton, and Hemos.)

From the Persian for "King" Frederic Friedel of Chessbase contributed some links which are especially interesting in light of the recently announced match between Deep Fritz and Vladimir Kramnik. He points to this link and this other link, saying "The latter has some nice quotes from Kramnik."

In addition, Frederic has links with more on Kasparov vs. Deep Blue, and Fritz in Space.

But the name is already perfect for a MAD parody ... RFINN writes: "If you haven't heard by now, Lucasfilm announced the name of Episode II. It's going to be called 'Attack of the Clones.' If you're like me, this stirs up pictures of Jedi running from giant red tomatoes and such. Do your civic duty and help change the name that has become the laughing stock of the sci-fi movie going community (and some of the actors themselves) by signing a petition to be sent to George Lucas."

Sold! to the man with the large contingent of lawyers! ncmusic writes "For all of you readers that have been following Bid For Power the DragonballZ Q3 mod. Funimation has issued a cease and desist order to the group. Funimation has excluse rights to DBZ in the US (and EU I think) and has sold exclusive video game rights to Infograms. Below is the announcement made on the site about the order. My question to the slashdot community is do you think this is fair? BFP is a FREE mod to an already existing game. Have their been any other precedence set for making mods based on characters from copyrighted work? And what advice do you have for the Bid For Power group?

'As many of you know Funimation owns the copyrights to Dragonball Z in the USA and has sold the exclusive rights to publish video games to Infogrames. On December 1st, 2000, the Bid For Power team received a cease and desist order from Funimation.

However, they seemed receptive to the notion of allowing Bid For Power to be released so long as certain conditions were met. We were put in touch with Infogrames who asked us, among other things, to recreate Bid For Power on Wild Tangent, a java-based engine, which would then be posted on the Dragonball Z website for people to play. This engine is incapable of running something as detailed as Bid For Power and we would have had to start work from scratch. Most of the team rejected the idea and talks went downhill from there. Without contact with Infogrames or Funimation the progress of Bid For Power slowed down even though we were sitting on a finished product and had been for some time.

We began dealing with Funimation directly in April when they asked us to send videos of gameplay to them so that they could have TOEI Japan review it. We sent the videos and heard nothing until we emailed them in July asking that we be allowed to release in August, since no objections had be made from TOEI Japan that we knew of. We were then sent another Cease and Desist order by way of Funimation.'"

So the confirmed-as-rumor rumor has become real? This is the sort of thing that would be best kept in the realm of rumor.

335 comments

  1. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    The text above is the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution. I fail to see anything in there resembling anything about copyright infringement. I didn't think copyright came about until after the U.S. Constitution was written.

    I also fail to see why he got a +5 insightful for passing on info that was obviously false.. I guess some moderator had just too many points and decided to use them up.

    I believe the parody thing you were talking about deals with Fair Use rights, which was not put into the constitution, but it was written as a federal law or something like that (IANAL).

    As for where you draw the line in things like this, and I feel that the game company is right in this case, is when a product that a group of people create could possibly be in conflict with any current or future projects that the company that holds the copyrights on the said information.

    E.G. I make a dragonballz game, if the people who 'invented' dragonballz saw my game as something that they may create in the future, even if they dont have plans to make the game, can tell me not to make my game.. Its just how the rules work, I can see why it is like that, even though I think it would be nice if it was different..

    Geist (too lazy to find name/pass)

  2. The ST:TNG Mod for Doom 2 by Kengineer · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember this? The whole map was the enterprise, down to a T. Well, it wasn't a mod, it was a level, but it was pretty damn cool :) Even the transporters worked, but they always beamed you to engineering.

    1. Re:The ST:TNG Mod for Doom 2 by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      What's wrong with Engineering?"

      "He wanted to go to the Holodeck!"

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  3. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by JosefK · · Score: 1

    Actually, English grammatical structures haven't changed that much, certainly not due to the introduction of the apostrophe. English retains a genitive case (in the singular, at least), which French lacks. In your example, the French construction would be more like "The birthday presents of Tom are nice".

    The apostrophe as an indicator of possession is an accident of orthography, not grammar or syntax. The apostrophe traditionally represents sounds that are left out, usually vowels. The genitive (or possessive) case in the singular was generally formed in English by adding -es to a noun. The plural was generally -a. With a few exceptions, the e was gradually lost in pronunciation, and spelling conventions followed suit, putting an apostrophe in place of the e in every genitive - except for pronouns. I'm not sure if the use of an apostrophe without the "s" for the plural genitive arose at the same time. So from a historical perspective, the apostrophe in Tom's and the apostrophe in isn't are actually doing the same thing, not different things.

    Gradually, however, the concept of -es as the genitive marker was lost, and the "rule" of 's and ' (for plural) being the possessive markers was extrapolated from common orthographic usage. Most of the other case formations were regularised, and the genitive (marked now by the apostrophe) is really the only vestige remaining of the old case system, with the exception, again, of the pronouns.

    Pronouns were and still are irregular. "Its" as the accepted form of the third-person neuter genitive pronoun was well-established before "Tomes" would have been shortened to "Tom's". (As an aside, the dominant Anglo-Saxon form was "his", from the nominative "hit", consonant with masculine "he" and feminine "heo". The "h" was dropped in the dominant dialect, though some dialect populations in England and America still retain the old "h" pronunciation, however.)

  4. Re:There are better things to petition by Harbinger(JDW) · · Score: 1

    I don't see why anyone who has ever worked on fiction / science fiction / any creative work of their own, would even consider to sign the petition to get George Lucas to change the name of HIS movie. Make fun of it all you like, but it his movie. Just because you might not like it, and some other people agree with you, doesn't mean you should try and force him to change it. There is a good reason why you can't force him, it is because it is his creation and if you can't respect that then just don't go watch it. Don't read anything else about Star Wars. I am sure George Lucas wouldn't care, his movies aren't targeted at the majority of people who read and post to slashdot anyway. They are targeted at a generation of younger kids who don't have the experiences and knowledge it is hoped that we do.

    Do something useful with your time instead of bitching about someone else's story. Write your own or read one who's title you can live with.

    Harbinger

  5. Re:Distributed Chess by ralmeida · · Score: 1
    I read here in Slashdot that you would need the energy of 15 supernovas just to store all the possible games in your computer's memory (according to thermodynamics' laws).

    Of course, since I read it here in Slashdot, there's a 72,1489% chance of being wrong. People here always come up with numbers to prove their point.

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
  6. Video Game Copy Rights by NateTG · · Score: 4, Funny

    Funimation/infocomm has the rights to DBZ video games. TOEI (sp) does not, they've aleady sold them and could care less.

    However, if the game qualifies as a parody then most of the copyrights are extremely difficult to maintain. Having had some exposure to DBZ, i'm sure that it won't be that hard to get from serious DBZ to a Parody of DBZ.

  7. Re:Distributed Chess by snarkh · · Score: 1
    In fact if you store a game per atom all of the universe is barely enough.

    The estimated number of chess games is 10^80. The estimated number of all particles in the universe (a lot more of them than atoms) is 10^100.

    Also, if you have 10 billion computers, each computing 10 billion positions a second, it would take you only 10^60 seconds to enumerate them all. According to the physicists the universe has been in existence for about 10^18 secs.

    Of course you probably would not to have to enumerate all positions to solve chess, but the numbers are telling.

  8. Re:Petition.. by fallen1 · · Score: 1

    Errr, no, more like "Send in the Clones" :-p

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  9. Re:Distributed Chess by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

    Wrong. If you include one more number you end up with 72.14895%. You should have rounded upwards..

    - Steeltoe

  10. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by flumps · · Score: 1

    That particular collection of letters is called an acronym .

    And by the way you'd pluralise it VCR's, as with all acronyms I can think of. Probably.

    --
    "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
  11. whats in a name? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other word would smell as sweet. The thing is if you think about it, The Empire Strikes Back and Star Wars are pretty cheasy names, but we don't care, we see these movies anyway. Why? Because we don't care about titles, never did, (not sure why we are starting now) we care about content.

  12. Re:Wrong question. by Pasty69 · · Score: 0

    I'll start at the end first :) My point was they should probably have realized from the beginning they couldn't develop something like this aboveground, and they are now paying the price for not being a bit more FreeNetish. They DID in fact know better, and actually claimed that they had struck a deal with FUnimation at one time I believe. There were claims that things were fine, then this shows up much to their chagrin, nice work Chris! Having some practical experience with Q3 mods, I'll try to explain something. I think you are probably theoretically correct. They could do that and it would work to some extent. However! The boxed editions of Q3A for linux sold poorly, thus Linux is not a very powerful gaming force, thus Windows remains on top of the heap in gaming. What does this mean? All the DIY stuff with putting the game together yourself just ain't gonna happen with Joe. Q Windowsuser. You've gotten Linux on the brain (no offense meant by all this of course) and you're not used to packaging thigns up neatly and tidily for Win users. Sorry if I'm wrong on that, but that's how it seems. This mod wouldn't be half as popular on release if it was distributed in tiny chunks, with users creating hteir own pak files and creating hteir own images... Good in theory, but I don't think it would work for this particular instance. Lastly, I want to say that they are going to change everything to non-DBZ according to their website, and still have it out in a month. Hrmmm... They miss deadlines a lot, so don't expect this to actually happen so soon. Funimation blows :)

    --
    -Pasty
  13. Re:Distributed Chess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cause you dont know any of the good ones, stoopid..

  14. Re:Distributed Chess by FFriedel · · Score: 1

    Yes, a number of pawn-less six-piece endings have been compiled. See my other postings below.

  15. Flashback... by Jerry+Talton · · Score: 1

    "You might want to flashback to earlier reviews of these by...Jon Katz" Now that's a scary thought. Bad drugs that make you read Jon Katz reviews instead of just the normal spiders crawling in your mouth and melting walls. *Shudder*

  16. Continuing this OT thread... by SnapShot · · Score: 2

    I have to agree, though your entire email could be rewritten by replacing "'liberals' don't want to liberate us from anything except personal responsibility" with "'conservatives' don't want to conserve anything except their narrow religious outlook and their bank accounts". By the larger point remains, only simplistic morons continue to try and describe politics in a black vs. white, left vs. right, linear graph.

    Let's pick some examples and give a Bizzaro World rating on each isue:

    Abortion: This is one of the weirdest issues to be shoe-horned into the conservative versus liberal scale. Abortion is entirly a religious issue. A powerful subset of religions in this country has decided that this is their litmus test. The supposedly constitutional conservative polititions should be pointing to the "separation of church and state" clause of the Constitution and telling these groups to fuck off. The supposedly careing liberal politions should be fighting for money to build huge government "embryo orphanages" to bring up and help the helpless little zygotes. Bizzaro world rating: 9.7

    Welfare (see military): Tax credits to corporations, payments to farmers, discount grazing rates on public lands, mineral rights to public lands sold for a fraction of the private-sector value; all are defended by the supposedly conservative right wing and opposed by the supposedly liberal left. Bizzaro world rating: 9.4

    Military (see welfare): The biggest government-funded job program in history is the darling of the conservatives. On the other hand, the biggest government-funded job program in history (that also provides education and training for some of the poorest citizens) is the target of the librerals. Bizzaro world rating: 9.1

    Drug War: Similar to the arguments on abortion. The liberals are saying, "Stay out of my life, let me do what I want." The conservatives are pushing for military raids on individiual's homes, "taking" of private property, and system that amounts to little more than a government job's program for lawyers and prison guards. Since the drug war does proportionatly affect minorities and the poor these issue does play into the stereotypes of convervatives versus liberals which limits the bizzaro world rating: 5

    Environment: You would think that an Adam Smith solution to this issue would make everyone happy. Make corporations pay the full cost required to clean up after themselves. Charge full market value for logging, grazing, and mineral rights on government land. To do anything less is welfare. The conservatives sure don't seem to pushing very hard on this. On the other hand, liberals seem to have a knee jerk reaction against anything that "commodifies" nature and they also have a tendanency to want to spend infinite amounts of money on perfect solutions instead of available money on those solutions that will do the most good. See the flap over the "arsenic in the drinking water" as a good example of politics over results. Bizzaro world rating: 8.7

    My last point: next time someone tries and describe someone as "conservative" or "liberal" when they really mean "right" or "left"... slap them.

    --
    Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    1. Re:Continuing this OT thread... by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      Y'know, this is about the closest to an even-handed, well-reasoned political opinion I've ever seen on Slashdot. Bravo. I wish the moderators had gotten to this one (but, as we know, chances of being moderated drop to about nil after post #100 or so.)

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  17. Re:Petition.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole problem here is not whether it's a good title or not - it's a matter of whether it's a good title for this particular movie. Judging from Episode I, the image of Jedi running from giant killer tomatoes in Episode II may not be that far from what the movie actually turns out to be!

  18. Re:Distributed Chess by FFriedel · · Score: 1

    I have bad news for you. Chess will not be "solved" in the course of the current universe. Naturally we will not be able to generate and store all possible chess games, even up to move 40. That would be 10^112 games, which reduces the number of elementary particles in the universe to a silly, irrelevantly small number.

    But of course we could take the other route: generate all possible positions and calculate all winning lines, as Ken Thompson did in the 80ies for three, four and five-piece endings. When you complete the retrograde analysis on these the computer plays them perfectly. We even use these endgames in the Fritz search, so that these days typically Fritz ends its won games by announcing mate in 20 to 70 moves. The first batch of six-piece endings have now been generated, but they are big. And the interesting ones (not yet calculated) are with pawns, which makes them even bigger. Pawns ruin one plane of symmetry and have the irritating habit of being promotable, so that you have to have all the piece endings that can derive from them available as well. Fritz can access a number of pawnless six-piece endings, but there is currently no practical use for installing these endgames.

    How about the 32-piece endgame? Now this is seriously big, containing between 10^40 and 10^50 positions. Trust me, it cannot be handled by the computer farms you propose. Dr John Nunn (mathematician, chess Grandmaster) tells me that just storing the 32-piece endgame database using optimum storage techniques (smallest theoretical energy levels for each bit of information) would require the matter stored in a few million galaxies. Maybe it could be done, but John is worried what Greenpeace would say about a project that involves dismantling galaxies in order to store chess.

    They'd probably chain themselves to the rocket ships.

  19. Re:Not so silly. by buhdabuddy · · Score: 1

    I do not agree. I think Star Wars was perfect for the time in which it came out. Sure, it may sound "hokey" now, but come on, it was produced in 1977. I am sure that half of the people reading this reply weren't even born yet. This was made (and named) well before the mass producing of B grade space films in the mid 80's, which Star Wars set the precedence for.

    --
    Don't Upset the Buhda
  20. Re:Lucas Arts and naming the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am one of the worlds hungry. Where did I put those dam doritos...

  21. Distributed Chess by GigsVT · · Score: 1, Informative

    Has anyone thought to use something like distributed.net as a huge chess computer? I'd bet it would be several times more powerful than deep blue, even without chess ASICs.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Distributed Chess by FFriedel · · Score: 1

      Correct. If every particle in the universe was a super-computer and generated, evaluated and stored a billion positions per second, and all had started immediately after the Big Bang, and all were working with a perfect parallel algorithm, i.e. no computer duplicates the work of another, then the project manager today would have to admit that we still haven't scratched the surface of the problem. And that we're not going to solve it. Remember that in a mere 10^14 years all galaxies will have disintegrated and all stars burned out. After that the residual matter will also evaporate, so that after about 10^80 years only electrons and positrons will be left over. After 10^100 years even the super massive black holes will have evaporated. (After that things become hazy for me).

      However: it is imaginable that we (Fritz 10 or Fritz 15) will find a way to force mate after 1.e4 in less time than this. This is analogous to a computer finding a forced win in a specific five-piece endgame position without knowing all 120,000,000 positions that can occur in that ending, and certainly without generating all possible five-piece games that can be theoretically played with that material on the board.

    2. Re:Distributed Chess by Alfred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you don't solve chess, you would calculate "End Game tablebases" which are large lookup tables that tell you a game result given a chess (board) position. I believe that the 5 piece EGTB has been fully calculated, with parts of the 6 having been done too (ones involving queens?).

    3. Re:Distributed Chess by Grab · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hey, d'you know how highly customised these processors are for chess? And how highly optimised the code is to do the solving? Trying to split it over multiple processors with different architectures and serious latencies between them is a losing bet, at least for a real-time solution.

      I believe their main concern is getting it done in real time. Like weather forecasting or 3-D graphics, the techniques for solving the problem have been identified many years ago - the only problem is seeing how much processing power (and algorithm optimisation) you can put in to reach a certain level of "good".

      Grab.

    4. Re:Distributed Chess by Alfred · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It wouldn't work for a real chess game, the latency between the "nodes" is too large for a realtime chess game. I wrote a parallel chess implementation (parallelised the AB game tree search) on a Beowulf and that was pushing the latency requirements (I got down to 50msec).
      What Dnet would be good for is move searches and end game tables, tables that specifiy a board position and the final outcome of that game :)

    5. Re:Distributed Chess by Kynde · · Score: 1

      Interesting? What makes that comment interesting is that how can it get modded up to 5 without being called 'flamebait' or 'troll'. :) Anyway...

      A distributed chess engine would probably be too slow for a real chess game

      Complete bogus, chess prediction is extremely suitable for parallel computing due to exclusive branching of moves and would not be too slow to play a normal or even tournee blitz game. Even a couple of seconds of latency between the task distributor and it's distributees wouldn't matter. Naturally it'd make it a less optimized approach than some super multiprocessor computer. Give it a 10000 pcs and you'll get plenty out, but that's what clusters are all about.

      ...finite...A distributed system could play every possible chess game...

      Already well commented on this thread. There's simply not enough silicon in the universe to make the chips necessary nor is there enough time left before the sun eats the earth. And I'm not even going to arse my self about the memory requirements...

      For a simpler comparison you might want to think about how long it might take to solve some 256bit encryption by brute force... (hint: again, silicon and sun)

      --
      1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    6. Re:Distributed Chess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like everyone's dumping on the idea of solving chess, but a slightly less ambitious but no less interesting option exists: solve checkers. The Chinook Project, the current world champion of checkers, managed to solve all the endgames up to 8 pieces before 1992 (and indeed used some clever distributed computing algorithms to do so). The project is currently retired, but since the number of positions is only around 5*10^21 (only!), signifigantly less than chess, solving checkers might be more feasible, particularly on machines that are almost a decade more advanced.

    7. Re:Distributed Chess by Skuto · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Been there, done that:

      ftp://cap.connx.com/pub/Chess%20Analysis%20Proje ct %20FAQ.htm

      Building something that actually plays chess
      over such a network is not going to work. Latency
      is critical for all current parallel chess algorithms.

      --
      GCP

    8. Re:Distributed Chess by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 2
      There are an astronomical number of possible board configurations in chess, but they are finite.

      Maybe technically finite, but astronomical doesn't give justice to the number. My quick estimate is that even if you could somehow store one game per atom, the entire earth doesn't have enough atoms to save all of the permutations.
      With so many possible games, how come I never win?
    9. Re:Distributed Chess by seizer · · Score: 1

      a) too slow
      b) too open to corruption by dodgy clients
      c) not well suited to distributed solving

      IMHO :-)

    10. Re:Distributed Chess by Alfred · · Score: 1

      Dammit, remember to re-read the post before hitting submit ;)
      50usec NOT 50msec :)
      it had a simple star toplogy from the master node.

    11. Re:Distributed Chess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That should be 72.1489%, if you live in the US. Sorry, I'm brazilian.

    12. Re:Distributed Chess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the latency between the "nodes" is too large for a realtime chess game.

      Total crap. Alpha-beta search is a refinement of min-max search. Just do min-max for the first few levels, and do alpha-beta only within each node. Even if you replicate each node job 3 times to eliminate crashes and doctored outputs, the level of computing provided by distributed.net could add 4 plies of search to any chess program, which would make it incredibly strong. I can't wait until someone codes this easy project.

    13. Re:Distributed Chess by remande · · Score: 4, Interesting
      A distributed chess engine would probably be too slow for a real chess game, but it could be used to do something even more ambitious: solve chess.

      There are an astronomical number of possible board configurations in chess, but they are finite. A distributed system could play every possible chess game, attempting every possible move and every possible countermove, and find out what lines result in white win, black win, or draw. By building that sort of database, a computer would be able to play by rote memory to the best possible outcome.

      Once that was done, chess would be as "boring" to computers as tic-tac-toe is to adults, and for the same reasons.

      --

      --The basis of all love is respect

    14. Re:Distributed Chess by Shimmer · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how many games of chess are possible? It's something on the order of 10**18, or even greater (I don't have the number handy). Divide that by the total number of computers on the planet and you still have an impossibly big number. Sorry.

      -- Brian

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    15. Re:Distributed Chess by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Insightful
      There are an astronomical number of possible board configurations in chess, but they are finite.

      Maybe technically finite, but astronomical doesn't give justice to the number. My quick estimate is that even if you could somehow store one game per atom, the entire earth doesn't have enough atoms to save all of the permutations.

    16. Re:Distributed Chess by Collusion · · Score: 1

      I still get beat at tic-tac-toe, don't know what you're talkin about.

    17. Re:Distributed Chess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful ?

      Take a very hard problem.

      Divide the complexity by 1,000,000

      You still have a very hard problem.

      Cheers,

      --fred

    18. Re:Distributed Chess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My quick estimate is that even if you could somehow store one game per atom, the entire earth doesn't have enough atoms to save all of the permutations. First of all, how did you come to that estimate? Secondly, if true, this would be the type of problem best solved by a quantum computer.

    19. Re:Distributed Chess by pw80 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I once read somewhere (how's that for specific? :-) that it was calculated that if every electron in the universe were pumping out thousands of chess moves every second, it would still take many times more than all the time that has existed so far to compute all the possible chess moves there are. Maybe if we used a beauwolf cluster of universes...

      --

      beep

  22. Christ, get a life by p3d0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're going to sign a petition to make him change the name from "Attack of the Clones"? Really, is that any worse than "The Empire Strikes Back"?

    I swear, Lucas can do nothing right anymore.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Christ, get a life by garcia · · Score: 1, Troll

      sorry but for a basically limitless budget for a movie I can't think of *any* reason why he would want to name it "Attack of the Clones". I am sure that someone behind the scenes had to have had a much better title...

      The first movie basically sucked. I don't even want to think about what this one is going to be like w/a name like that.

      Want to see the limitless budget die? Keep the name.

    2. Re:Christ, get a life by p3d0 · · Score: 2

      Alright, I've had it with all the AotC/ESB title comparisons; its not clever, or a revelation.

      Ok, and here comes your own clever revelation:

      "Attack of the Clones" sucks, bottom line, end of story.

      Wow, touche. Now I see the light.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    3. Re:Christ, get a life by Tsujigiri · · Score: 1

      I was thinking "SW2: Shadows of War", but that's good too.

      --

      "I'll take the red pill. No! Blue! AAAaaaahhhhhhhhh"
      - Monty Python meets the Matrix

    4. Re:Christ, get a life by p_trinli · · Score: 1

      You're oodly doodly welcome!

    5. Re:Christ, get a life by KyleDogg · · Score: 1

      No it should go like this: The Jedi
      The Empire Strikes
      Hope


      A New Hope
      The Empire Strikes Back
      Return of the Jedi

      hahahaha

    6. Re:Christ, get a life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, "AotC sucks" is a statement. "Look at me, I show you the error in your logic by making you realize that you're not considering that 'ESB' is just as hokey" is the unclever nonrevelation. See theforce.net message boards for dozens of people who think they're just as clever as you. Actually that's probably where you're parroting it from without comprehension (it sounds like a revelation, it MUST be). ESB became partially cheesy after the fact, due to the success & popularity of the Star Wars trilogy. AotC is cheesy before the fact.

    7. Re:Christ, get a life by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Did it occur to you that maybe I really think "Attack of the clones" is no worse than "Empire Strikes Back"? It's not an attempt to be clever. Maybe I really disagree with you.

      Not everyone who gets 5, Insightful is karma whoring.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    8. Re:Christ, get a life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright, I've had it with all the AotC/ESB title comparisons; its not clever, or a revelation. "Attack of the Clones" sucks, bottom line, end of story. We can't ask for an ESB name change (and I probably wouldn't because I disagree with the assertion that it's bad), but we can ask for an AotC name change.

      go "SW2: The Clone Wars".

      While we're at it, go "SW3: The Fall of the Jedi"

    9. Re:Christ, get a life by cretog8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > Really, is that any worse than "The Empire Strikes Back"?

      ...or "Return of the Jedi"?

      Star Wars has always been sci-fi space opera fluff--GREAT sci-fi space opera fluff. It's the stuff of cheap, easy teenage male fantasy, with slimy green aliens keeping our women in bondage fetish wear, big explosions, simple farmboys secretly being born to be galactic heros, etc.

      "Attack of the Clones" is a perfect title in this tradition.

    10. Re:Christ, get a life by garver · · Score: 2

      I swear, Lucas can do nothing right anymore.

      Funny, I was just thinking how Lucas can do no wrong. He is absolutely masterful at keeping the Star Wars hype going with pre-release rumors. In other words, he gets to keep selling action figures by the ton, with little promotional expense. Hell, he doesn't even have to make a good movie any more and it grosses $430 million, nevermind the action figures.

      Come on, why do you think he re-re-released the original trilogy? Just to make the public happy? Do you think it was coincidental that shortly after he re-re-re-released the same triology but now in a gold case with new scenes and animated critters? Why do you really think the DVD isn't coming out yet?

      He knows he's got a pile of suckers and is milking us for all we're worth. Personally, as long as he keeps entertaining me (via the movies, the pre-movie hype, or the action figures, I don't care), I'm more than happy to keep playing the sucker.

    11. Re:Christ, get a life by MrNixon · · Score: 3, Interesting
      YES! The Fall of the Jedi would be perfect. The progression would be perfect ... the titles would hold the story arc in a nutshell:

      The Phantom Menace
      The Clone Wars
      The Fall of the Jedi
      A New Hope
      The Empire Strikes Back
      The Return of the Jedi

      That would truly be awesome.

    12. Re:Christ, get a life by Pasty69 · · Score: 0

      Hell, he doesn't even have to make a good movie any more and it grosses $430 million and MAN, was Episode 1 not good! Speaking of rape a few posts back, Episode 1 (and probably 2 as well) was rape of a perfectly good franchise.

      --
      -Pasty
    13. Re:Christ, get a life by Tackhead · · Score: 3, Funny
      > Star Wars has always been sci-fi space opera fluff--GREAT sci-fi space opera fluff. It's the stuff of cheap, easy teenage male fantasy, with slimy green aliens keeping our women in bondage fetish wear, big explosions, simple farmboys secretly being born to be galactic heros, etc.

      (You are L. Ron Hubbard, posting from Mars orbit, and still bitter about Heinlein being a better writer than you. Lord Xenu demands that you take back what you said. "Friday" was not space-opera fluff, and the aliens in it were neither slimy nor green!

  23. English for Dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope Luca's takes those petiton's seriously and change's the title. Attack of the Clone's i's reall'y stupi'd. Then agai'n, it's better than the killer tomato's.

  24. Re:Lucas Arts and naming the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes... and I'm the loser who is pointing out that you're a loser for pointing out that he's a loser for bagging on all the losers. But in the end I'm the only one who saw the irony applied to my own post before someone else told me. I'm not going to say I'm better than you here, because I'm not... I just acknowledged ahead of time that I'd blow a couple minutes on this little bit of sad recursion so the cycle can hopefully stop. We're on slashdot. Face it, we all suck. Thanks to everyone for your dilligence in making the obvious even more painfully obvious and the redundant even more redundantly redundant.

  25. Re:Giant Red Tomatoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I felt like pelting the ugly motherfucker with tomatoes when I saw Episode I. (Jar Jar, not Lucas. But the title of Episode II is making me question the wisdom of that choice.)

    Actually, I wanted to pelt Lucas. That fat tub of lard is as ugly as you say.

  26. WildTangent, Programming, And Q3A mods. by Draeven · · Score: 3, Interesting

    WildTanget ( http://www.wildtangent.com ) Is not a necesarrily a Java engine. It is a graphics module useable in just about any programming language, this includes C++ and Visual Basic. The team wouldn't have to start from scratch, they'd just have to clone the Q3A engine. The WT object is very flexible and could very well make a game like Quake3. It just wouldn't be as fast. Don't diss the WildTangent =P

    1. Re:WildTangent, Programming, And Q3A mods. by David99 · · Score: 3, Informative
      This URL

      http://www.wildtangent.com/developer/downloads/ove rviews/WebDriverOverview/index.html

      Bypasses all the marketing fluff and explains what the product actually is.

      --
      -- Welcome to nowhere fast / nothing here ever lasts.
    2. Re:WildTangent, Programming, And Q3A mods. by delmoi · · Score: 2

      The team wouldn't have to start from scratch, they'd just have to clone the Q3A engine.

      Just?

      --

      ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  27. Re:What BFP should do: by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    5) acknowledge the fact that yes, they're trying to take somebody else's creation, and exploit the franchise for their own uses. They're not getting money for it, perhaps, but the point is that they're using somebody else's work without asking.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  28. Re:NO NO NO by Danse · · Score: 2

    You won't find time-shifting or space-shifting in USC17 either, but we do have those rights. Thanks to the courts anyway.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  29. Re:Lucas Film name by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 2
    The way I heard it, GL went into the studio a short while before the movie was complete and said he was changing the name to "Return...".

    When questioned why, he said that "Revenge is not a Jedi Concept".

    IIRC, this little factoid was revealed on the "The Making Of...." preview at the start of the Special Edition video tape (3-tape widescreen collection, U.K. version, though it's probably present on all the SE Ep III tapes).

    However, I'm posting from work, so I'm unable to verify this source right now. It could all be a figment of my diseased imagination. Or it could be marketing spin to make Lucas sound more like Buddha and less like a merchandising-cash-hungry dog.

    --

  30. Re:Petition.. by drphil · · Score: 1

    Send in the Clones?

  31. Re:Not so silly. by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

    It sounds like another way of saying "celebrity deathmatch".

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
  32. Re:Wrong question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry. my usage of the word "gpl" was tossed-off. I was trying to imply, in a way, "open source", to the greatest extent to which the mod could be open sourced.

    Keep in mind i haven't the foggiest idea how to create a q3a mod; i didn't particularly like quake 3, and so i didn't buy a copy. Therefore i don't know much beyond what i saw in the demo and at other people's houses.

    Whether you can gpl an image, you *can* distribute the entire mod in a format where the images, models, sounds, and program code are all in their own little seperate files rather than being lumped into one compiledish modfile. (of course, for all i know, q3 mods actually *are* distributed with the models & sounds all remaining as seperate files in a big tarfile or something.. i don't really know). My mention of the gpl is because it has a nice little conception of how you have to distribute source-- you have to give all the individual components, in a form they can be used to tweak and reproduce the "binary". This would be sound, source code, and whatever project files glue it all together. I figured that "gpl" makes about as much sense as "open source".

    (For the record, you *could* gpl an image; you couldn't release seperate "source" to that image (maybe you'd have to release any unflattened photoshop files you still had, if you still had them.), because the image *is* the source, but you would by gpling the image be saying that any "derivative work" would have to be gpled-- i mean, if you reused the image in a game, you would have to gpl that game.)

    It would , of course , be no better to gpl it than to bsd or lgpl it... and given you are using images, concepts and characters you don't own, you should probably just public domain it. (again, my use of the term "gpl" over the term "public domain" earlier was solely based on the gpl's insistence of distribution in a form with uncompiled component parts, not because of the ideological things behind it)

    A VERY interesting case would be this: They release their mod under the GPL; Funomics or whoever takes the images & character models & other DBZ recreations, and boxes the whole thing as a Q3 DBZ mod in stores; gpl violations are claimed; and Funomics argues that becuase they own the right to those images, not the creators of the mod, the creators of the mod did not have the right to mandate the GPL restrictions on those images, and becuase the GPL is based off of using copyright law to ensure the source remains open, Funomics wins. (Alternately, Funomics just shipped the whole mod, the court would probably rule that they have a right to images and models and other DBZ things, but the program code to the mod is still GPLed...) Interesting thought experiment.

    HOWEVER:
    Ugly. But they'd have to replace all the name references to copyrighted characters as well... a lot of changes overall to make it distributable.

    You misunderstood my point.. which is that instead of putting their names on the mod, getting space for it with a company that knows their names and addresses, etc., they should have just made the "source" files for the whole thing available while it was in development, so that if they get tracked down and get C&D letters, others can circulate the files person2person and continue the creation of the mod, and that way, they wouldn't have to bother with copyright laws, because the laws would be irrelivant. If they had done that, the DBZ mod would be playable now. As is, it will not be playable until they have done what you say-- remove all DBZ names and likenesses from the game; and that is because of a consious choice they made, that having their names on the final product is more important than being sure that the final product uses DBZ characters. My point was they should probably have realized from the beginning they couldn't develop something like this aboveground, and they are now paying the price for not being a bit more FreeNetish.

  33. Re:Lucas Film name by dragonmaster_zoc · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I don't see why anyone would bother to print up shirts for this movie if it's going to be as bad as Episode 1 (that means it has Jar^2).

  34. Re:FU - no i insist FUCK YOU !!! by H310iSe · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Fark. I modded this as troll and it came out modded as funny. "Troll" isn't even near "funny" on the dropdown, I don't think I flob'd it. Anyway, um, metamod me *stands like a sacrifice* but know that, um, i don't think it was actually funny. *sigh*

    --
    closed minded is as closed minded does
  35. Re:Where can I get it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RC1 and RC2 were leaked. The webpage that originally had them to download was shut down by the makers of the mod... if you look around you may be able to find it.

  36. Tomatoes, please, not Tomato's by GeekLife.com · · Score: 2

    Please correct the petition to state "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes" rather than "Attack of the Killer Tomato's".

    It's already extremely unlikely Lucas will pay any attention, but we might as well be grammatically correct in our attempt, so as not to be discarded before he even sees the petition.

  37. Re:Funimation by snake_dad · · Score: 1

    Is it a coincidence that your nick is "Gee... sue!"? :)

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  38. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by unitron · · Score: 2
    Adding the letter "s" and apostrophes as needed makes a word plural or possive or both or turns it into a contraction incorporating "is" or "has".

    Who was the idiot that thought *that* was a good idea?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  39. Re:Books vs. Movies? by mcc · · Score: 1

    Oh, horror of horrors!

    I have lost the respect of an unidentified person somewhere who has nothing better to do at 11:58 PM on a friday than read and respond to random comments about star wars on slashdot.org!

    It is clear i have disgraced myself and my family by reading star wars novels in the seventh grade between classes. I must now ritually disembowel myself in the seppaku ritual.

    *SOB* what have i done

  40. What does RMS think? by neier · · Score: 1


    Someone should petition Lucas to release Ep. 2 as a GPL movie.
    Then we could name the $#(* thing whatever we please. ;-)

  41. Re:Petition.. by earthpig · · Score: 1

    just my 3 cets worth
    episode one was such a dissapointment, i feel to hell with it.
    the quality of the title gives me a glipse of what to expect from the movie, and its not good

    i think "attack of the killer clones" would be better

  42. Re:Bloody Petition by njdj · · Score: 1

    IMHO, the reason why people complain about lame content in Ep. 1 is because they ... grew up.
    No. I first saw Star Wars when I was 31. It was popular with my contemporaries and was certainly not seen (except possibly be literati who affect to despise all SF) as a "kids' movie".
    I was disappointed by Ep I because it clearly is aimed at kids, and unless I hear that Ep II is different (unlikely, under any name) won't bother to see it.

  43. Re:Books vs. Movies? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

    Tell me, sir, how does it feel to be an expert on ficitious events conjured up for the amusement of children and associated merchandising?

    At least he reads books. I doubt you could say the same.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  44. Re:Petition.. by Traxton1 · · Score: 1

    See, I would think it would be "The Clones Strike Back."

  45. Re:Let's stop this ludicrous Lucas-bashing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coincidence???

    Absolutely. You're reading far too much into a movie that was basically designed to go "bang", "boom", "oooooooh" a lot.

    That applies as much to RotJ as TPM. The fact they have superficial resemblance to anything deep and meaningful is completely coincidental - and it probably says as much in the credits...

  46. Re:Lucas Arts and naming the movie by p_trinli · · Score: 1

    I second that.

  47. Re:Christ, get a life & dictionary by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

    Remember, periods go inside the quotes.
    Some of us hackers/geeks do it differently for a reason. Not sure if that applies here, though.

    --
    main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  48. Re:Funimation by tonywong · · Score: 1

    If MS wanted to kill Capcom by cloning streetfighter, they wouldn't be allowed to use the same characters. Instead, they'd be forced to use Ballmer the dog boy, Paper-clippy, Bill-borg and Code Reddy the IIS giant.

  49. Re:Let's stop this ludicrous Lucas-bashing.... by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 2
    Let's see now..... the parent said [/me cracks open economy-size BLOCKQUOTE tag box]:
    It showed its characters embracing violence (Amidala), deceit (Qui-Gon) and anger (Obi-Wan) in order to do what they considered to be the right thing.
    and:
    All three contingents are effectively "disarmed" (sometimes forcibly) before they achieve victory. And the moment they give up their weaponry -- they win.
    Heh, tell that to Qui-Gon : )

    But aside from Qui-Gon becoming a double-ended shish-kebab (and forgetting to become one with The Force), Obi-Wan was only briefly disarmed, before picking up Qui-Gon's sabre and finishing the job. And I recall Amidala fighting her way into the throne-room where she could point a gun at the Trade Federation guys. Neither really gave up their weapons. And the whole battle was eventually resolved when Anakin fluked the destruction of the control ship (man, they had light-speed travel, but didn't know about redundancy) using a Naboo ship he'd borrowed.

    I suspect that you're reading just a little bit too much intentional sub-plot into the movie.

    --

  50. Re:Funimation by ncmusic · · Score: 1

    They never offered to pay them. At least not to my knowledge.

  51. Re:Christ, get a life & dictionary by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Remember, periods go inside the quotes.

    This is a silly convention which leads to ambiguity, and I only use it informal writing.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  52. Re:Funimation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    More accurately, left wing = toltarian government (communism, fascism, monarchy, olgiarchy, socialism) and right wing = anargy.

    You've been on the happy dust, again, right? The far left is actual Socialism and Communism (actually, I'd argue that Communalism is even further left) -- these are systems that don't work and never have. The far right is Fascism and some Totalitarian systems (excluding, of course, Communism). Conservatism is not, as people dumbly argue, for smaller government. The fact that Conservatism proposes to impose so many moral restrictions on its people (more laws) mandates more law enforcement, which, of course, means a larger government. Both systems expand the Government, but in different ways.

    This does not mean the entire spectrum of Government is Totalitarian. Only that the extremes are. Most governments are inbetween. Libertarian, contrary to the assertion of the original sig, is a left-wing, liberal idealogy. The argument he wanted to make was that the Democratic Party is for Socialism and the Republican Party is for Fascism. Neither are true. (Albeit, while the Socialists and Communists are Independents that vote inline with Democrats, the Fascists are generally a part of the Republican Party.)

  53. Grammar Nazi, again. by sudotcsh · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Good god. Did they let Cmdr Taco write that petition? How do they expect Lucas to take it seriously when there are apostrophe issues everywhere?!

    I refer them to this handy guide: Bob The Angry Flower's Quick Guide to the Apostrophe, You Idiots

    Hopefully that'll clear things right up.

    ---

    1. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your more likely to get "birthday presents of Tom are nice".

    2. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Humorous spirit accepted. They didn't have any specific rule covering acronyms, so I figured a "collection of letters" is just as good. ;) Plus they had "M.D.'s" as an example, so I think we're good.

    3. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by operagost · · Score: 1

      There are two of the letter "A" in this sentence.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by flumps · · Score: 1

      Nobody thought of it, I'm sure it just evolved that way. Imagine having to go around saying:

      "It is the birthday of Tom" instead of "It's Tom's Birthday" (much easier) or

      "Tom has birthday presents that are nice" instead of "Tom's birthday presents are nice" (far shorter).

      French is a good language to look at: if you translate french word for word you get something like English grammatical structures would have been pre-apostrophe (pre-atrocity? hmm).

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    5. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by flumps · · Score: 1

      Ag, sorry. That should of read:

      ..particular collection of letters is definately called an ..

      Please don't flame me, please don't flame me :(

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    6. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2

      Using an apostrophe to show plurals of numbers, letters, and figures is optional.

      That being said, I'm opting not to use it because it looks freaky weird to write VCR's.

    7. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by Fat+Casper · · Score: 5, Funny
      Eat shit; billions of flies can't be wrong.

      Sorry- I meant billion's.

      It does depress me that to avoid lowering the self esteem of million's of illiterate's, we need to condone their mistake's. These are prople that can't even find their (there?) country on a map two out of three time's. I'm all for language evolving, but I refuse to follow the lead of the hillbilly's. I suppose that after a few more generation's of homeschooling these folk's will be writing Webster's for us. I think I'll just move to Canada and speak French. They might have stupid idea's about language, but they're better than your's.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    8. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by YoJ · · Score: 1
      I prefer to use the apostrophe in that situation. Here is the way I prefer:

      There are eight E's in this sentence.

      There are two A's in this sentence.

      So you think it should be: there are two As in this sentence? That's a lot of ass.

    9. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by jdavidb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Out of curiosity, do you consider a VCR to be a letter, a number, or a figure?

      :) (Please accept this in the humorous spirit it was intended, as if we were old friends or something instead of complete strangers on the Internet.)

    10. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      Thank you, thank you, thank you! This is destined to become my favorite destination on the web. This kind of thing just ~grates~ on me to know end.

    11. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by jdavidb · · Score: 0, Redundant

      know end

      Feeling kind of stupid and sheepish, now. Say, is that preview button any good?

      Is it past my bedtime yet?

      Hey, wow. Slashdot makes you wait two minutes between each post. Never ran into that before.

    12. Re:Grammar Nazi, again. by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Sorry, had to do it..

      That should of read:

      "That should have read" or "that should've read".

      ..particular collection of letters is definately called an ..

      Definitely.

      <grammar flame="off">

      ;)

  54. wars wars wars... by CeramicNuts · · Score: 1

    Star Wars: The Clone Wars

    doesn't this sound redundant redundant to you?!

  55. Too Close. by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2
    Lucas should have embellished the title a little more to "Attack of the Killer Clones from Outer Space", though hopefully it won't be quite that hokey (cross fingers).
    That suggestion is too close to the runner-up tittle of "The Empire Plan 9 from Outer Space" which, after much heated debate and several small skirmishes amoung the writers, lost out to the current tittle. We can only hope this doesn't come up again less we have yet another "Retro SciFi" jihad amoung Lucas' staff. There's still "double latte white chocolate mocha" fallout in the conference room ceiling tiles from the last one.
  56. Re:Attack of the Clones! by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 2
    Hey; Easy on Hamil. Don't stick him in with Jar-Jar and Jake Lloyd (BTW, would a quick IMDB search to check names have killed you? : )! He's infinitely prefereable to either of those two losers (he also appeared in some of the Wing Commander games, an episode of The Outer Limits, and I hear he does a few of the voices on the Batman animated series - a much classier resumé).

    Anyway, if Jar-Jar and Jake had been involved the title would have been more like "Itsa De Cloneys Attacking. Yippeee!".

    --

  57. Re:Bloody Petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your sig...

    Really, I always read Anonymous Coward posts, and always post as Anonymous Coward.

    Supporting the rights of Anonymous Cowards for 2 years now!

  58. Re:Funimation by q-soe · · Score: 2

    Umm no

    But they have the right to protect their trademarks - it is the Law - Dont like it - go to university and get a law degree, or run for government and change it - dont sit there and whinge. Legally they have a perfect right to control the actions of a non profit mod - the own the character rights and thus they can legally say how and where the names, images and concepts can be used - end of story.

    The MS comment is childish - you are talking about 2 different licenses and 2 different laws - MS license you to make USE of their product thus you can write letters on it etc etc.

    Fair us unfortunately has NOTHING to do with copyrighted images etc, the company could choose to not block or to block it - they have chosen the latter - and Funimation have total right to stop them as they own the characters (legally)

    Check out the MS license and then do a search on copyright laws.

    These guys have wasted their time and they lose out -they should have gotten a clearance in writing before starting - thats what BUSINESS people do - and even if its not for profit the company can argue the very reason they chose the Dragonball Z characters was to get the considerable fan base intersetd that is they used the funimation copryrighted material to attract customers to their product - whether they make money of not is a moot point really.

    --
    I refuse to argue with Anonymous Cowards - if you want a discussion get an account....
  59. Re:Lucas Arts and naming the movie by drsoran · · Score: 1

    It does seem kind of silly though to call it "Attack of the Clones". Why not simply Star Wars Two: The Clone Wars. That's what the period has been known as for years.. it'd make more sense. Ah well. Doesn't matter to me. I'll probably go see it but I'm not one of these crazy people that goes out and buys the DVD of the movie (well, if there was one) and all the boxed variations of the directors cut, etc. and the toys. That's just silly.

  60. Bloody Petition by vulg4r_m0nk · · Score: 3, Funny

    My first response when seeing the petition to change the god awful name of Episode II was happiness at being able to voice my mind and support an effort to improve a series I care about.

    On consideration however, I think that signing that thing ignores the real problem -- quality of content. It is my expectation that Ep II will suffer a weak storyline, lame characters, jackass explanations (i.e., the Force comes from bugs in your cells or whatever the hell that was) just as Ep I did. Given this near certainty, I think the title is great. Let shit be called shit and we can save ourselves some grief.

    1. Re:Bloody Petition by xjarodx · · Score: 1

      IMHO, the reason why people complain about lame content in Ep. 1 is because they ... grew up.

      Yeah, but after 20 years of filmmaking, why didn't George Lucas grow up, too? You'd think from 20 extra years of experience between Star Wars films Lucas would have some idea of his own limits as a writer, director, and vision/idea man/producer for movies. He's got the last part down, and I suppose he's a decent director, but, man, the lines he gives his actors in Ep. I and IV are pretty weak. "Yippee!" "Midichlorians!" "I recognized your foul stench when I was brought on board!"

      What amazes me is how, despite all those extra years of experience, similar Ep. 1 and 4 are: both written and directed by Lucas himself. The lines are equally horrible (though I would say that Ep. 4 has better moments with R2 and 3PO than Ep. 1 with Jar Jar), but Ep. 1 just has the bigger budget. It's a shame Lucas didn't spend any of it on a decent writer. I don't have any problem forgiving Ep. 4's shortcomings since it had a small budget, time restraints, and was the first go at the saga. But Ep. 1's style over substance, weak plot, hackneyed slapstick antics, and lame lines are unforgivable - especially considering Lucas had all that time to "grow up" with us.

      In the end, I just hope Lucas is so overwhelmingly confident with Ep. 2 that he can afford to give it this, well, just f'in stupid title.

    2. Re:Bloody Petition by Compuser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IMHO, the reason why people complain about lame content in Ep. 1 is because they ... grew up. I came to the US when I was a grown up and saw Star Wars episodes for the first time when I was older than 20. I see no difference between the episodes in terms of quality. How is an animated Jamaican-spouting goon worse than a metal wizard-of-oz'ish charicature of a robot, or a rolling trash bin with blinking lights? I am not trying to troll, I am just saying that SW is aimed at kids and is not bad in that realm. Ep. II will probably not deviate from this money making scheme, but where is the grief?

    3. Re:Bloody Petition by osgeek · · Score: 2

      Nah, with the advent of the Ewoks, Lucas moved his focus toward a decidedly younger audience. I saw RotJ when I was a kid too, and those fuzzy, cutesy, JarJar precursors absolutely ruined the movie for me.

      There are other qualitative and quantitative differences between the first movies and ep 1, but I've spent enough time discussing what went from a series that was targeted at 14-20 year olds to a series that's targeted for 6-12 year olds.

    4. Re:Bloody Petition by unitron · · Score: 2
      But did you see the first 3 movies (episodes 4,5, and 6) as a grownup when they were new and not already an indelible part of the culture, before a bunch of other movies, television shows, and who knows what all else influenced by those first 3 movies were created?

      I did. Phantom Menace just wasn't as good. At least not if judged as a movie intended for adults.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    5. Re:Bloody Petition by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      I don't like to admit it, but I grew up. And I still like Empire Strikes Back. So just because something is aimed at kids, that doesn't mean it has to suck. A good storyteller can go after the kids and still be attractive to other groups as well. But somewhere along the way, Lucas forgot how to do this, or decided that it wasn't important.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  61. The petition is closed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that it would have done much good anyways :P

  62. Re:Funimation by billcopc · · Score: 1

    They were a mile beside the point when they mentioned Wild Tangent's WebDriver. This game is a mod, the developers of BFP didn't write the Q3 engine upon which it runs, they just did a truckload of new graphics and sounds, and wrote zillions of lines of gameplay code. That's why people make mods instead of standalone games : you save the hassle of writing your own game engine and easily benefit from the pros' work. If these guys were to actually make BFP in WebDriver, it would probably end up looking like an old playstation game (low-polys, cheap colors) because they might not be very familiar with the intricacies of 3d lighting and tesselation issues.

    Infogrames's lawyers are either ignorant or well informed. Either they stated this out of pure idiocy, or someone in the know told them that it would not only look good to the press, but it would also stop the BFP team dead. I'm putting my money on #2.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  63. Ahh yes... Foxing is still popular, I see. by m00t · · Score: 1

    Back in the Good Old Days(tm/c/r/patent pending), I and a decent sized group of friends were working on the Predator Quake TC. It was a lot of fun and we were nearing our first public beta. (un)Naturally, our morally mindful leader got the notion to ask for permission. *pow* FOXED. It was rather depressing, but what could one do?

    I wonder what they'd think if the ZIP got released... Then again, thinking back on it, I'd be rather embarassed. :P

    Someone needs to do a TC that's a bit more original. I mean, people *don't* have to use pre-existing monsters to do good work. DoD and CS for half-life are hugely popular without such content usage.

    I'm not saying it's fair that we can't use freely (as in no one gets a dime) things that are popular and recognizable. It's just that I think we're pretty unlikely to win this battle anytime soon. Why not make our on multi-million dollar franchises? :>

  64. There are better things to petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are better things to petition than the name of the next star wars. Sorry, but they screwed you on the last one -- now is the time to give in.

    What might be better? Well, for one:
    Anti-DMCA Petition:
    http://www.dibona.com/dmca/

    Programmers speak in Code.
    http://www.anti-dmca.org

    You really need to start acting or there won't be any net...

  65. Re:So difficult? by oiuyt · · Score: 1
    A cease and desist IS lawyer for a simple no.... doesn't GET much simpler than that....

    -B

  66. Clone names by Daimaou · · Score: 1
    I can understand Lucas wanting the word "clones" in the title of Episode II since it deals with the clone wars. However, I can think of at least 10 cheesy names containing the words "of the clones" that are much more acceptable than Attack of the Clones.

    • March of the Clones
    • Scourge of the Clones
    • Storm of the Clones
    • Strike of the Clones
    • Onslaught of the Clones
    • Drive of the Clones
    • Onset of the Clones
    • Pugnacity of the Clones (A good one to give the word pugnacity the attention it deserves)
    • Bellicosity of the Clones
    • Bedlam of the Clones
    • Militarization of the Clones
    • War of the Clones
    • Combat of the Clones
    • Fray of the Clones
    • Clones of the Clones of the Clones...
    I hope George will break out his Thesaurus and Dictionary and do a serious rethink of this title.
  67. Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Let's face it: if you know it's someone else's property, why spend thousands of hours doing development without securing permission to use it?

    Stupid people get no sympathy here.

    (Karma, goodbye...)

    --

    ---

    Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

  68. Star Wars? Think about the nane!! by ajs · · Score: 2

    Look, "Attack of the Clones" is cheesy, I admit, but a whole lot less chessy than "Star Wars" or "The Empire Stikes Back". We've just gotten used to those being the names of great movies.

    People keep getting upset about the Star Wars films having Lucas fingerprints all over them, and for the life of me, I can't understand why! Star Wars is Star Wars, and it should not suprise you that there are things as painful as Ewoks, as predictable as light-sword fights, as broken science as ships meant for vacuum with hinged hatches. These are the hallmarks of the fun-but-essentially-fluff science-fiction-fantasy that Lucas creates. It's decent fantasy, but with high (and almost certainly accidental) camp value.

    Go see the movie expecting a Lucas film, and I guarantee you will not be disappointed. Go expecting the next 2001, and you will be an unhappy camper.

  69. Re:If Lucas didn't listen for Jar Jar, then... by operagost · · Score: 1

    Are you a real troll, or just play one on TV?

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  70. Re:Petition.. by sid_vicious · · Score: 2
    While we're at it, tack on:

    "Crouching Jedi, Hidden Clone"

    Can't take credit for that one, though... :)

    --
    If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet.
  71. Re:Funimation by Mahonrimoriancumer · · Score: 1

    If your viewpoint is the case, then where does anarchy fit into the political spectrum? I admit that I over simplified my explanation, but the main point that I was trying to show is that if total government is on the left and total government was on the right, where would no government be? It obviously is not in the center...

    --
    So climate's changing. So what? It has always changed. The big news would be if it wasn't changing. - Dr. Philip Stone
  72. Let's stop this ludicrous Lucas-bashing.... by cyberon22 · · Score: 4, Informative
    I'm disappointed that slashdot is endorsing this ridiculous petition to Lucas. Especially since the new title makes perfect sense.

    The Phantom Menace refers to the underlying theme of the SW films: evil lies within. It showed its characters embracing violence (Amidala), deceit (Qui-Gon) and anger (Obi-Wan) in order to do what they considered to be the right thing. Intelligent film-watchers who have seen ROTJ should be aware of this. It is only when Luke renounces violence at the end of ROTJ that the tables turn and the "good" side wins. Coincidence???

    Consider the end of TPM. All three contingents are effectively "disarmed" (sometimes forcibly) before they achieve victory. And the moment they give up their weaponry -- they win.

    But what does this all have to do with clones? Thematically, TPM is full of "doubled images" (handmaidens, Sidious/Palpatine, droids) which are associated with order falling apart. Even the planet Naboo is split into two halves (the ego and the id - diplomats and warriors), etc. And so if you actually bother to reflect on it, the new title makes perfect sense. These bad decisions our "protagonists" will make (out of - no doubt - a desire to do good) will begin to backfire on them badly.

    As much as people may dislike Jar Jar (I found his presence objectionable myself), doing idiotic things like signing this petition is just foolish.

  73. Re:Attack of the Clones! by then,+it+was+nigh · · Score: 1

    [...] and I hear [Hamill] does a few of the voices on the Batman animated series [...]

    Most notably the voice of the Joker [as a quick IMDB search would have revealed... ;)]. Which blew my mind when I found out -- I mean, the voice of the Joker and the voice of Luke Skywalker are not two that I would have pegged, just from listening to them, as coming from the same man.

    --
    sed 's/In Soviet Russia/In NSA America/g' < yakov-smirnoff-jokes.txt
  74. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by siegesama · · Score: 1

    Did you completely disregard everything he said, simply because you wanted to post something that sounded as holier-than-thou as that? This doesn't even have the slim arguments of "theft" that the various "media pirating" scandals have perpetrated. This is the reinterpreteation of character design as a game mod.

    This is similar to fanfic, in my eyes, or a fan site using pictures proclaiming undying love for the series.

    Unless you're just trolling, in which case I suppose it's all okay then.

    --
    what the hell is a 'junk character', anyway?
  75. I dont give a rats ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anime is gay and DragonBalls is the worst gayest penis-whore suckfest of them all!

  76. Re:Funimation by Perrin-GoldenEyes · · Score: 1

    Okay, we're a little off topic here, but it's a slashback, and I think it's a fairly interesting discussion so I'm gonna put in my $0.02.

    I'm not really sure what you're talking about when you refer to libertarianism as a "left-wing, liberal idealogy". I assume you're talking about US "liberalism" here, which is a horrible misnomer. US "liberals" don't want to liberate us from anything except personal responsibility. But that's another issue. US "liberalism" is extremely close to socialism. They haven't quite managed to push us into a truly socialist system, but that is certainly what they are trying to do. They attract votes by telling the less well off that they've been screwed by the system, and that they'll take lots of money from the "rich" to institute all sorts of social programs to make things better. Well, they don't actually accomplish much, but they seem to have the masses gulled into thinking that voting Demokrat is their only hope of achieving the "American Dream".

    The Republicans aren't really much different. They do have the evil influence of the "Religious" Right, but that's balanced by their slightly closer adherence to the Constitution in other areas. The point is that both parties are primarily interested in preserving the status quo which places them jointly in control of the country. And those in control (with the exception of the occasional statesman [read: politician with a conscience]) will always be interested in increasing the size and power of the government. That means less freedom for the average citizen. Unfortunately, the average citizen (at least here in the US) isn't all that smart, so when a politician tells him that adding this shiny new social program is gonna make things better, he believes it. Especially if the tax jump to support it is only applied to the "rich".

    Note: There are a number of definitions of "rich". For the purposes of this comment, there are two important definitions, that for the average US citizen and that for politicians. To the average US citizen, "rich" means "anybody who is making more money than I am." To determine who is rich to a politician, you have to pick an income cut off line. That line has to be high enough that the "rich" people represent a minority of the population, but low enough that they represent a sizeable minority. If it is too low, there will be enough "rich" people that when you screw them they can probably make sure you don't get reelected. If it is too high, there aren't enough to exploit effectively because you simply don't bring in enough money for the government.

    --
    -Perrin.
    Now I want you to go in that bag and find my lightsaber. It's the one that says bad mother-fscker on it.
  77. Revenge of the Jedi by RogueAngel7 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This may be a little bit before some of you, but Lucas refered to Return of the Jedi as Revenge of the Jedi to the press as to make it more dificult to find out info on it, and He has a long history of Misinformation, Misdirection, and Tentative Title names to keep people on thier toes.

    I expect this to be no differant.

    --
    "Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds" - RWE
    1. Re:Revenge of the Jedi by Jim+Turner · · Score: 1

      No, he didn't. He changed it at the last minute because "revenge" sounded too violent. --jim

      --
      ~ I would like to apologize in advance to those of you whom I may one day kill.
  78. Funimation by Magius_AR · · Score: 1
    The Funimation people are complete bitches. They complain about practically _any_ use of DBZ in any way. If you say the word the wrong way, they'll be on your case.

    Magius_AR

    1. Re:Funimation by Steeltoe · · Score: 1

      Who are you to give legal advice?

      Observing yourself before speaking or acting is a good idea.

      - Steeltoe

    2. Re:Funimation by faldore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh. Really. So you believe that simply because a corporation bullys you you should believe everything they say? There *is* a legitimate question here as to whether they have the legal right to control in any way the actions non-profit, free mod of an existing computer game. Saying that they have a legitimate claim is like saying that someone who wrote a school essay on Microsoft Windows deserves to be sued by Microsoft for using their "copyrighted" material in the essay. It falls under fair use. They are not profiting from it. They are not "photocopying" original material. They are simply designing a free mod using ideas that have been aired on television. I believe there are also laws that anything aired over public airwaves becomes fair game. So just because Funimation claims they have the right to stop these people doesnt mean that in fact they do.

    3. Re:Funimation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BFP is a FREE mod to an already existing game. Have their been any other precedence set for making mods based on characters from copyrighted work? And what advice do you have for the Bid For Power group?

      Fan-sub is generally accepted part of the core North American anime culture. These are people who copy the Japanese shows, translate them, and then subtitle them. They will freely copy their results far and wide. They typically make specific stipulations against sale or rental of the material. However, when a company purchases the rights to North American distribution, the continued distribution of a fan-sub is considered piracy.

      Despite the fact that it is free, the product would eat into the possible profits to the people who fairly and legally bought North American distribution rights. Both the distributors and fan-sub people know this and generally play nice together.

      My advice to BFP is to either provide your effort to Infograms or gracefully step aside and see what Infograms can produce. If the project is important to those involved, try negotiating permission to continue from Infograms.

    4. Re:Funimation by nomadic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Whatever your opinion on whether it was right or wrong, I don't think it's outrageous for Infogrames or Funimation to think it might cause competition to them; I mean, you're basically creating a game based on a story you don't own. And anyone who doesn't consider a mod a real game must not have hit the computer game store lately. Look how many mods have hit the shelves as retail games (and are presumably making money). Personally I think Infogrames was acting pretty cool in offering the developers a chance to get involved in legit, paid work.

    5. Re:Funimation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didnt write this post but i DONT consider it flamebait - its actually the truth - bet this moderator is the same guy who modded the steven king dead troll up to informative

    6. Re:Funimation by osgeek · · Score: 2

      They are simply designing a free mod using ideas that have been aired on television.

      Profit isn't the deciding factor. If Microsoft decides to clone StreetFighter and give it away for free in an effort to kill Capcom -- like they killed Netscape by giving IE away for free -- is that okay? They're not making a profit on it!

      The issue of damage to the copyright holder has to be part of the discussion.

      Liberalism is socialism. Conservatism is fascism. Vote Libertarian.

      Amen, brother. I can agree with that one.

    7. Re:Funimation by Mahonrimoriancumer · · Score: 1

      Liberalism is socialism. Conservatism is fascism. Vote Libertarian.

      socialism = total government, fascism = total government, liberal = left wing, and conservative = right wing.

      Does this mean that the entire spectrum of government is toltarian? If so, where does anarchy fit in?

      More accurately, left wing = toltarian government (communism, fascism, monarchy, olgiarchy, socialism) and right wing = anarchy. This leaves different degrees of government between the two extremes.

      --
      So climate's changing. So what? It has always changed. The big news would be if it wasn't changing. - Dr. Philip Stone
    8. Re:Funimation by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > ... received a cease and desist order from Funimation.

      "Do not taunt happy Funimation ball Z."

  79. FEAR by gnovos · · Score: 2

    Jar Jar clones...

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  80. Re:Christ, get a life & dictionary by DirkGently · · Score: 2

    Actually, that dates back to the old by-hand printing presses. They had to put it inside the quotes for some strange reason.

    --

    I keep trying to pick fights, but I can't shake this Excellent karma.

  81. Re:Wrong question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This mod wouldn't be half as popular on release if it was distributed in tiny chunks, with users creating hteir own pak files and creating hteir own images...

    It would be pretty easy to distribute it in more than one form simultaneously, even if over hotline.

  82. Re:Petition.. by carlos_benj · · Score: 1
    I think it should be, "Attack of the Fifty Foot Giant Killer Clones from Planet X" starring Burt Ward. Maybe George is looking to hire one actor and digitize him/her into millions of supporting roles....

    I did understand that one crucial battle scene pits Obi Wan against a disgustingly profane clone on an elevated platform. Just as the authorities arrive the clone plunges to his death and Obi Wan is arrested for making an obscene clone fall. This sends his young apprentice spinning out of control into the dark side of the farce. Unable to make bail, Obi Wan escapes and becomes a hermit on a remote, desert planet.

    Episode 3 will be a response to the more vocal fans and will be called, "Obi Quiet, It's My Movie!".

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  83. Fan Art! by TigerBaer · · Score: 1

    Imho a mod based upon some story/show/movie/game etc, is really just a form of fan art. IF i make a level for Counterstrike that seems remarkably similar to the battleship in UnderSiege.. should i be liable to be sued? If i draw a picture of one of the dragonball z characters for my personal enjoyment (is a free mod for anything but?) am i violating their copyright? HELL NO. Fuck off Funimation!

  84. Re:Lucas Film name by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

    The alternative reason is that Star Trek 2 was coming out at about the same time, and it's original title was "Revenge of Khan". Lucas changed his movie so there'd be no confusion, but then it got changed to "Wrath of Khan" anyway.

    --
    Dyolf Knip
  85. Reading into the film.... ;) by cyberon22 · · Score: 1

    But aside from Qui-Gon becoming a double-ended shish-kebab (and forgetting to become one with The Force), Obi-Wan was only briefly disarmed, before picking up Qui-Gon's sabre and finishing the job.

    The parallel is to ESB. The "pit" is bad news in any symbolic reading (falls from grace, death, etc). By rising out of it to confront Darth Maul (who allegorically represents the evil within), Obi Wan becomes a "true" Jedi Knight (he gets a green lightsaber). Symbolically, Obi-Wan passes the test that Luke failed in ESB when Luke refused to accept that Vadar was his father (and thereby confront the fact that the potential for evil existed in him as well).

    Neither really gave up their weapons. And the whole battle was eventually resolved when Anakin fluked the destruction of the control ship (man, they had light-speed travel, but didn't know about redundancy) using a Naboo ship he'd borrowed.

    Absoutely. But ANH also showed us a victory built on violence - and look where it went. Its end ceremony explicitly quotes Leni Riefenstahl's "Triumph of the Will". The new film is equally skeptical on a symbolic level. Victory WAS accidental, and it WAS based on violence and not the kind of conscious moral decision (Luke's) that triggers victory in ROTJ. And so we end with day falling to night (good --> evil) in a funeral ceremony clouded with fear and uncertainty. Not exactly a happy ending.

    I suspect that you're reading just a little bit too much intentional sub-plot into the movie.

    I understand your skepticism, but I'd respectfully suggest that you're not giving Lucas enough credit. Why does the new film keep referencing Ben Hur? Why are we continuously given suggestive Christian images associated with the fall from Paradise? Why is all of the color symbolism consistently negative with regards to our "heroes" (Amidala wears red and black!!)? Why such emphasis on "masks" and doubles? Why the shift in emphasis from the sun to the moon, paternal to maternal relations?

    As much as some of its features (like Jar Jar) may be offputting to some, it is hard to ignore the incredible complexity of the film as a whole.

    1. Re:Reading into the film.... ;) by Dr_Cheeks · · Score: 2
      Dude, you just blew my mind. Well done. Now I have to learn what you just said so I can tell all my friends.

      Oh, just to clarify, I'm geniunely not being sarcastic here (I would have used more italics and the SARCASM tag).

      Wow.....

      --

  86. Re:hehe by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

    He knows a girl with a Revenge on the Jedi shirt. Does that not just say "she-geek" to you?

  87. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by TGK · · Score: 2

    I actualy disagree with the point I'm about to make... but your logic is flawed so I'm going to point it out to you.

    Don't think "theft" of the digital property. Think "theft" of the rights to distribute that property. Once someone else has given the property away you no longer have the exclusive right to distribute do you? Unauthorized copies are moving around. That's how it's "theft."

    --
    Killfile(TGK)
    No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  88. An idea for the Q3 mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    --Instead of trying to fight this battle, the writers of the Q3 DBZ mod should sidestep and throw it back in the copyright holders face.

    They should turn it into a parody.

  89. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by JoeShmoe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can my character have DBZ hair? Can my character have DBZ clothing? Can my character shoot big fireballs? Can my character have DBZ naming?

    You draw that line in the sand and I'll find some way to split it in half. Copyright laws were designed to focus on intent, not specifics.

    - JoeShmoe

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  90. DragonballZ characters. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well *DUH* of course they were going to be told to cease and desist. It's a terrible shame that people with the imagination to create a game of that complexity and richness couldn't have spent another 1% of the time to think up some slightly different characters. Anime characters are so formulaic anyway, I'm not sure anyone would actually have noticed anyway!

  91. Where can I get it? by merchant_x · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anybody know if a copy has been released into the wild? I would like to download it before it gets sued to oblivion.

  92. If Lucas didn't listen for Jar Jar, then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...why would anyone think that he'd listen to fans about the name. It's probably been focus-grouped to death by yes-men MBAs from various toy companies. Face it. Lucas is losing his touch. He has little of Akira Kurasawa's work left to plagiarize -- or worse still, chooses not to. Each film has been worse than the previous. I'm expecting Attack of the Clones to be about as good as, say, the average Star Trek Voyager episode.

  93. Wrong question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you know that you're in a country with a screwed up legal system that can allow a copyright holder to limit the third-party use of characters from horrible tv shows even when the use does not dilute the copyright, affect in any way the profits or revenues of the original copyright holder, or make money for the third-party, then why on earth make it possible to send a cease and desist letter? Publish the whole thing anonymously on xoom.com, GPL it, and make sure that every step of the design process from pre-alpha up is freely available so even after xoom gets the C&D letter and kicks you off, your mod will still be floating around hotline. Just let the community have the thing, and it will never die, no matter how hard the lawyers try to stamp it out.

    P.S.: To the "call to power" people: It might be too late to "leak" your source code anonymously to usenet-- since the lawyers can whomp your asses even if the leak was unintentional-- but it isn't too late to get your thing distributed. replace your splash screen with a big "DBZ SUXOR!!" drawn in Microsoft Paint and release the thing. Taa-daa! You are now "parody", and protected under what's left of the U.S. free speech laws.

    Anybody remember that old macintosh World Builder game set in Mr. Rodger's Neighborhood...? Damn, that thing was hard.

    1. Re:Wrong question. by Pasty69 · · Score: 0

      Can you GPL graphics and models and sounds? If not, then you'd have nothing to distribute. Code is great and all, but have you ever played Q3 when it's missing textures or models? Ugly. But they'd have to replace all the name references to copyrighted characters as well... a lot of changes overall to make it distributable. I doubt the actual gameplay is anything similar to FUNimation/Infogrames concept for the game, and there can be no copyright violation on gameplay anyhow... but back to my point, I was under the impression that you could GPL code and stuff, not binary iamges and models and sounds. Care to enlighten me?

      --
      -Pasty
  94. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by JoeShmoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not so fast...I think this is not as simple as you make it sound.

    I think there is a case to be made that this mod would fall under the category of parody. This means that it is protected from claims of copyright infringement under the first ammendment.

    Besides, if you want to take such an exclusive view...where do you draw the line? Can I use a DBZ skin for my player? Can I use a DBZ character name for my player?

    IMHO, if there is no profit involved then the courts, society, and all of us should be giving people wide latitude when it comes to these kinds of creative endevours.

    - JoeShmoe

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  95. Funimation by q-soe · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    The question if it is fair is not relevant unfortuantely - i know that this an unpoluar opinion in some quarters of /. but funimation holds the copyright on Dragonball Z and thus they have the right to control its usage and appearance, thus if they say cease and sesist you cease and desist - its the law and the law has nothing to do with fairness. You could argue fair use and no profit but i fear that wont work as they have proven themselves to be aggresive in defending their copyrights (and it is legal for them to do so)

    --
    I refuse to argue with Anonymous Cowards - if you want a discussion get an account....
  96. Re:Christ, get a life & dictionary by ethereal · · Score: 1

    Of course, you included a redundant "at least", so apparently nobody's perfect. The "its"/"it's" thing bugs the heck out of me too, but I suppose you can't blame posters for getting it wrong when none of the /. editors know which one to use :)

    --

    Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

  97. Star Wars title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't the movie title just be named what it's about: Clone Wars. I think all Star Wars nerds have heard of the Clone Wars.

  98. Re:Books vs. Movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Tell me, sir, how does it feel to be an expert on ficitious events conjured up for the amusement of children and associated merchandising? Perhaps some "Big Bad Wolf" and "Tiny Toons" experts would like to comment on this as well.

    And in no way, sir, does this post insinuate that you are a loser. Because you're not, really! I mean, how could such a well-versed Star Wars expert ever be called a fucking loser?

    Sir? Sir? Are you there, sir?

    ...loser.

  99. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you create a DBZ skin you can be sued for copyright infringement.

  100. Re:Petition.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Maybe "Send In The Clones?"

  101. Giant Red Tomatoes by piehole · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm sorry but did you see that last movie. Giant Red Tomatoes would be a huge improvement. I think the petetion should be to replace Jar Jar with a Giant Red Tomato.

    1. Re:Giant Red Tomatoes by ckedge · · Score: 1


      I keep thinking "Attack of the Clowns"

    2. Re:Giant Red Tomatoes by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > I'm sorry but did you see that last movie. Giant Red Tomatoes would be a huge improvement. I think the petetion should be to replace Jar Jar with a Giant Red Tomato.

      I know I felt like pelting the ugly motherfucker with tomatoes when I saw Episode I. (Jar Jar, not Lucas. But the title of Episode II is making me question the wisdom of that choice.)

      I guess Lucas figured that if we wouldn't let him ruin Episode II with Still More Jar Jar Binks, he'd self-destruct the whole franchise by turning it into a series of 50's B-movies.

      On the other hand, at the current rate of decline in the Star Wars franchise, there's hope that Episode III will be entitled "Planet of Hot Grits" and feature plenty of gratuitous wet-toga-and-jewelry shots Natalie Portman getting her hair done. Wooooooooooooo-hoooooooooooooo!

  102. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think there is a case to be made that this mod would fall under the category of parody

    That case could be made if the mod did in fact fall under the category of parody. However, it does not, so I fail to see the relevance.

    Besides, if you want to take such an exclusive view...where do you draw the line? Can I use a DBZ skin for my player? Can I use a DBZ character name for my player?

    No and no. You don't own the copyright. Even just for "personal use" is still an infringement of copyright [but you're not likely to be caught].

    There is no line to be drawn. It's simple copyright law.

    these kinds of creative endevours.

    If the mod authors were so fucking creative why couldn't they invent their own characters?

  103. Re: Still get beat at tic-tac-toe by Xoro · · Score: 1

    Ouch. Maybe you should give Global Thermonuclear War a shot.

    --
    Kill, Tux, kill!
  104. Petition.. by jvoisin · · Score: 1

    Looks like nobody can sign the petition to ask to have the name changed. With the traffic they are going to get from /. they could get quite a formatible list of signatures. ;)

    Too bad.. I think that 'Attack of the Clones' is a pretty silly name.. May as well call Episode 3 'Return of the Clones'...

    1. Re:Petition.. by Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

      Bad mental picture:

      Jar-jar gets cloned ;)

      -= rei =-

      --
      *Kid Rock runs for Senate* Democrats: We must run Kid Scissors.
    2. Re:Petition.. by optikSmoke · · Score: 1

      My two cents:
      No matter how many people sign that petition, George Lucas will ignore it. He has already demonstrated his ability to be a complete crackpot. IE: Jar Jar, and (correct me if I'm wrong), but didn't he call DVD a fad and refuse to publish Star Wars on DVD?
      So I guess we'll be seeing Attack Of The Clones make an attempt to clean up after the Phantom Menace and Jar Jar Binks.
      BTW, does anyone know where to get the Jar Jar-less version?

    3. Re:Petition.. by Yorrike · · Score: 1

      Episode 3 is going to be called "Attack of the Clones 2", I can just feel it.

      --

      Looks can be deceiving. Or CAN they?

    4. Re:Petition.. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Funny
      The Killer Clones from Outer Space
      Shakes the Clone
      Planet of the Clones
      Home A-Clone
      Clone with the Wind
      Jurassic Clone
      The Lion Clone
      Beverly Hills Clone
      The Clonefather
      Honey, I Shrunk the Clones
      Dances with Clones
      101 Clones
      Snow White and the Seven Clones
      The Rocky Horror Picture Clone
      An Officer and a Clone
      The Nutty Clone
      The Hunt for Clone October
      The Clonefather II
      Remember the Clones
      Star Trek IV: The Voyage Clone
      Interview with the Clone
      Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Clone
      Star Wars VI: Return of the Clone
      How the Clone Stole Christmas
      Raiders of the Lost Clone
      Saving Private Clone
      The Perfect Clone

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  105. Re:Lucas Arts and naming the movie by Sherloch+Hemloch · · Score: 1

    Isn't there a PETA site or some civil rights site you can post at? I don't post there so don't be bringing your soapbox around here, fella. * Heard that JAr Jar was in this one too...Howabout "Attack of the crappy cardborad characters" or "Slow destruction of Childhood memories"

    --
    Never trust a bald barber; he has no respect for your hair
  106. Petition by Legion303 · · Score: 1
    Mr. Lucas is already the laughingstock of the sci-fi community. I don't think a petition will change that.

    -Legion

    1. Re:Petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Lucas is already the laughingstock of the sci-fi community.

      Then the joke is on the laughers. Why would people in the sci-fi community bother to laugh at stuff in other genres, such as the Fantasy stuff that Lucas makes? What next, is Vernor Vinge a laughingstock in the porno community?/p.

  107. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by TGK · · Score: 2

    While theUnited States Constitution makes no provisions for or against the existance of copyright that does not mean it is not legitimate law (general reference, not disputing your point). Remember that The Congress shall have Power... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

    The Courts have taken this to mean (especialy under the 14th ammendment) that the Congress can make pretty much whatever law it wants provided that it doesn't abridge any specific or implied freedom as determined by the court. Furthermore, I find it highly unlikely that this Court is going to strike down Copyright as unconstitutional.

    --
    Killfile(TGK)
    No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  108. Lack of scarcity.. by Bothari · · Score: 1

    There is no lack of scarcity, in other words it's not the same as someone taking something away from me and giving it away, since in that example I wouldn't have it anymore.

    This is *NOT* the case here, a copy leaves the original intact. If i remember my history correctly, it was one the points raised by your very own Thomas Jefferson, when he raised some personal worries concerning copyright and patents...

    Of course, it might reduce the market value of the original...

  109. precedent of nixing mods by room101 · · Score: 1

    Yes there are some precendents for a company nixing a mod that contains their IP.

    id shutdown a mod for q2 called "generations" that featured BJ blowkosky (sp?)(wolf3d), the Doom! marine, the Q1 dude, and Q2 players. Some game where they all played together. id didn't want it because they had q3 coming out and a "return to castle wolf" in the works. Whatever.

    Also, 3drelms (makers of duke nukem) shut down many sites that had maps for q2 that were remakes of the classic duke nukem 3 maps. Even bigger whatever.

    --
    room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
    (they always break you eventually)
  110. Re:DONT JUST MODE HIM - TERMINATE HIM by geekoid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All speech has rights. Even twits like him.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  111. Lucas Arts and naming the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Umm am i missing the point here ? maybe cause as far as i can see Lucasarts can name the movie anything the like - they own the property after all, they appeal of phantom menace i think has shown that they no longer rely on the fanboi element for survival and they could really call it Star Wars Three - Obi One sucks Yoda's cock and they would all still go and see it.

    Dont you think its a bit childish to have petitions to change the name of a movie that a company has decided on ? What about world hunger? civil rights ? rape? Nope were gonna protest about a movie

    I give it approx 10 minutes befors some ethical person posts email addresses for lucas arts staff or george lucas himself - that wayy all of you can mailbomb them to death in the reponsible adult way you all practice

    1. Re:Lucas Arts and naming the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rape and such is already illegal. Why would you protest something that isn't allowed? (which makes me wonder about MADD, much like http://www.seanbaby.com

    2. Re:Lucas Arts and naming the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Those who would sacrafice their freedom for a little temporary clone deserve neither" - Benjamin Frankilin

    3. Re:Lucas Arts and naming the movie by Chester+K · · Score: 2

      Dont you think its a bit childish to have petitions to change the name of a movie that a company has decided on ? What about world hunger? civil rights ? rape? Nope were gonna protest about a movie

      Man, that means you must be extra childish since instead of spending your time helping out the homeless, downtrodden, or battered, you're here ranting about people ranting about a movie.

      Sorry sir, stop looking down your nose as people; not everyone has to devote their lives to the 'important' causes. Life would be pretty damn boring if nobody took the time to deal with some of the 'frills'.

      --

      NO CARRIER
  112. Re:What BFP should do: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a really fucking retarded post.
    What will Funimation do? Sue them.

  113. Y'know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Tthe "UPDATED" feature in Slash is there for a Reason. Why don't you slashdot-editor-people ever seem to *use* it?

    If you're going to put up a link to a petition which is closed *before a single comment has been posted*, then wouldn't it make sense to alter the article and note in it "oh, btw, you can't sign the petition anymore" ?

    What's up with this wierd aversion to updating the article to reflect important details that are A) in h2 type at the top of the link B) noted in cid #12 or so..? I mean, it isn't a big problem.. i'm just curious.

  114. Attack of the Clones! by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1
    If you haven't heard by now, Lucasfilm announced the name of Episode II. It's going to be called 'Attack of the Clones.'

    Hey hey hey, quit bashing the name. I hear that Jar Jar Binks, Mark Hamel and the little kid that played Anakin Skywalker spent hours thinking this over. Let's all honor their hard work!

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  115. regarding the funimation thing by RestiffBard · · Score: 2

    I'm not a fan of dragonball Z (sorry Taco I just don't like it) but this whole thread brought to mind fan fiction. I have every feeling of certainty that some company has the book rights for dragonball z and I'm sure that there are books out there based in the DBZ universe that can be had at any waldenbooks. just as easily I'm sure i can search google for DBZ fanfics. so when is someone going to start CandDing fan fic sites?

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  116. Re:Java is a dead anguage by HDAMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey, there is nothing wrong with Latin, so lay off.

    --
    The truth is always there, whether or not you want to believe it.
  117. It was a typo by the_other_one · · Score: 1

    It was really Attack of the Cones

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
  118. Books vs. Movies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Everyone complained about Episode 1, and now everyone is complaining about Episode 2. I know that movies often tremendously differ from books, but how similar are the books and movies in the Starwars series? Is there a JarJar in Book 1? Pod Racing? Force-o-meters ?

    1. Re:Books vs. Movies? by mcc · · Score: 1

      While there have been a LOT of star wars books by a variety of authors, and the universe described by them is QUITE intricate, the star wars movies are definitely wholly the creation of LucasArts.

      Books exist for all the movies, but these books are based on the movies and NOT the other way around. I *believe* that the books based on the new movies are being released to stores *before* the movie is released but *after* the movie is written, and that the books based on the original movies came out after the movies had left theatres, and that they all describe the exact same events. Don't quote me on any of that.

      While LucasArts has apparently agreed that the movies will respect the continuity of the books, this doesn't make a big difference in terms of Episodes 1-3; no book so far has covered events which take place prior to the beginning of the original Star Wars movie (well, OK, they did a couple small-time books about shit that Lando Calrissian and Han Solo got into when they were young. That doesn't count, and there is no way those books could affect the events of any movie.), and almost all of them take place years after Return of the Jedi ends. Therefore, for episodes 1-3, LucasArts doesn't have to work very hard to get things to match up with the continuity of the books; we have only tiny, tiny vague references to work with as to what the sequence of events before the first Star Wars movie was. We know *some* things about the nature of the technology the Clone Wars were based on. That's about it. Other than that, Lucas can make up whatever wierd shit he wants (and so far, he has) without worrying about conflicting the books, because the books are so incredibly vague about what happened during the fall of the Old Republic.

      Episodes 7-9, whenever they finally come, will have to work a good bit harder to come up with something really interesting without affecting the timeline of the books, as the hundred years after Return of the Jedi ends is just full of books. It's been conjectured that episodes 7-9 will happen in the same timespan, but not the same continuity, as the Jedi Academy series of books, but there's absolutely no way of knowing.

      As far as "force-o-meters" go, there have been various hints in the various books as to that it is at least possible to create machines to detect when someone nearby is "strong in the force"; the Jedi Academy series includes a machine found in an abandoned building that was previously controlled by imperial administrators which was able, vaguely, to identify force-sensitive individuals-- those strong in the force had different energy signatures, or something, as interpreted by this machine. That thing was more along the lines of using heat-seeking goggles to see people in the dark, though, and how the thing worked wasn't explained (because they didn't know how it worked), as opposed to this "midichloreans" (??) blood-test crud.

      Don't worry Samuel L Jackson and Frank Oz will save us.

  119. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1
    The fact of the matter is that these mod developers are releasing a DBZ game. Yes, I know it isn't a standalone title and it is free and everything else - that doesn't matter. If Funimation ever wants to release a DBZ game, they don't want to have to compete against some Q3 modders. Technically, it is illegal to use DBZ skins and names and everything else too, but those aren't half as serious as a full-blown mod. Funimation doesn't care if you use a DBZ name as your player name in Q3 or Diablo II or anything else, there's nothing there to potentially cut into their revenues later.

    yrs,
    Ephemeriis

    --
    "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  120. Whatever happened with history.. by HIghoS · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did anyone even bother to listen to the little bit of history the original movie presented itself with? do you guys even *remenber*? (the ones always bitching about E1 being crap ;)

    If they are making the movie after the Clone Wars, the title is perfect..perhaps it is 50-60ish, but so what, it's better then watching the Trade Federation and the annoying droids do all the fighting ;)

    Then again, i'm use to reading the Star Wars books, which are as we all know, books are always twice as good as movies ;)

    1. Re:Whatever happened with history.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The clones are made byt he republic to fight the robots, so you won't get away from them...

  121. Attack of the Clones by csbruce · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, movies frequently have fake names while they are still in production. ROTJ was once called "Revenge of the Jedi" while it was still in production. In any case, Lucas should have embellished the title a little more to "Attack of the Killer Clones from Outer Space", though hopefully it won't be quite that hokey (cross fingers).

    1. Re:Attack of the Clones by ajmarks · · Score: 1

      "Revenge of the Jedi" was changed to "Return of the Jedi" at almost the last minute. They had already printed and begun to distribute posters by then. As a side note, these posters are very valuable to those who spend their money on that kind of thing.

      --
      Opinions are not Informative, though they may be Insightful or Interesting.
  122. Star Wars Two: The Clone Wars by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    Admittedly, "Star Wars Two: The Clone Wars" is a much cooler name, but it's probably too similar to "Star Wars".

  123. Attack of the fans by Nom_Anor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it's incredible how people are always bitching about StarWars! First you complain about The Phantom Menace title, next about JarJar, next about Attack of the clones. Since the SW prequels resurfaced, the only thing people are doing is critisizing George on every thing he does. You really think The Empire Stikes Back was such a great title?? Come on! If I was George Lucas I would stop right after Attack of the clones and NEVER make the 3rd one. How cruel would that be?

    1. Re:Attack of the fans by osgeek · · Score: 2

      If I was George Lucas I would stop right after Attack of the clones and NEVER make the 3rd one. How cruel would that be?

      Oh, please, Jesus. Make him stop before releasing this one.

  124. Oh, the humanity! by dstone · · Score: 2

    Rape and such is already illegal. Why would you protest something that isn't allowed?

    News flash... things that "aren't allowed" still happen. Plenty. Bringing attention to illegal atrocities may serve to reduce their occurance even more.

    Unfortunately, very little is likely to reduce the occurance of Star Wars movies. Sigh.

  125. What BFP should do: by Omerna · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They have four options:

    1) Change the game to a Dragonball Z like mod. All they would have to do is change the faces of the characters. Just so they are not immediately recognizable. They would also have to change a few maps (like Kami's house).

    2) Ask for donations. Check out the forums over there (links at the top of their page) and if everyone only sent $5 dollars they'd probably have enough for legal defense. Some lawyers might take it pro bono for publicity.

    3) Get whichever company makes Quake (don't own it so I don't know) to help them. This is a mod for an existing game, so Funimations licensing may not cover it.

    4) "Sneak" a copy or several hundred thousand out to the general public. Once it's out (and I've heard copies are already floating around) what is Funimation going to do? I envision an ICQ/ email/ etc distribution campaign. This is what I would do.

    --


    No sig for you.
  126. So difficult? by rabidcow · · Score: 1

    "...we emailed them in July asking that we be allowed to release in August, since no objections had be made from TOEI Japan that we knew of. We were then sent another Cease and Desist order by way of Funimation."

    What? A simple "no" wouldn't have done?

  127. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by number+one+duck · · Score: 1

    I don't think they will get you for naming yourself after their characters. What you need, my friend, is a buck naked, shaved bald, pregnant Bulma skin.

  128. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by itp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    IMHO, if there is no profit involved then the courts, society, and all of us should be giving people wide latitude when it comes to these kinds of creative endevours.

    So if I take something of yours and give it away, but I don't charge for it, that's ok, right? Because there's no profit involved, right?

    Something tells me this viewpoint is just a little bit simplistic.

  129. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didn't take anything away, they made use of existing ideas. There's a significant difference between physical theft, and a dispute over a copyright or trademark.

  130. You might want to... by Balinares · · Score: 1

    ... flashback to earlier reviews of these by Michael Sims and Jon Katz

    No I don't. But thank you. :)

    --

    -- B.
    This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
  131. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by remande · · Score: 2

    IANAL. That out of the way, the line for parody is that it must use only as much of the original to be readily recognizable. I suggest that a good parody that knew how to stay on the line was Spaceballs. They could even gat away with Dark Helmet's...er...helmet, plus the Alien re-enactment in the diner. Mad Magazine also knows its way around how far it can go and come in under the parody clause.

    --

    --The basis of all love is respect

  132. That's nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard that the new Planet of the Apes was originally titled Marky Mark and the Monkey Bunch.

  133. The 'right' to control? by Balinares · · Score: 1

    You definitely have a point, you know; but you might also want to re-read this. If only it was as simple as a matter of 'right'...

    --

    -- B.
    This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
  134. hehe by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

    I know a girl (well woman now) who still has a Revenge of the Jedi T-Shirt...its bound to be worth, say, $20 by now ....

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

    1. Re:hehe by Jester998 · · Score: 1

      "I know a girl"
      Whoa... back up a sec. You mean, like a 3D entity of the opposite sex? DAAMMMMNNNN... tell me how ya did it, oh grand geek master. :)
      I can't meet a chick even when I'm trying. LOL

  135. If Attack of the Clones wasn't bad enough by MeowMeow+Jones · · Score: 4, Funny
    Lucas announced that after finishing episode three, he plans to film Episodes 1-1137 of THX.

    Dude's got to lay off the crack.

    --

    Trolls throughout history:
    Jonathan Swift

  136. NO NO NO by Danse · · Score: 2

    Jebus people! If you create something for your own personal use it DOES NOT constitute copyright infringement. Nor would it constitute patent infringement. Those 2 areas of law are designed to prevent COMPETITION. If you are not distributing the creation, it is not competition.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    1. Re:NO NO NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if you create it for your own personal use and then give it to a friend, you have violated copyright. Kinda makes multiplayer DBZ skins pointless.

    2. Re:NO NO NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Contrary to popular belief, you are wrong. Read USC17 if you don't believe me. Or, point me to the part of USC17 where it says "making copies is fine provided it's for personal use".

      This "personal use" thing is a myth. Read the law. It's not in there.

      The only thing personal use does is protect you from being caught.

    3. Re:NO NO NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I heard it on Slashdot, so it must be true!

      Dense

  137. WRONG by Danse · · Score: 1

    If you DISTRIBUTE a DBZ skin you can be sued for copyright infringement.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    1. Re:WRONG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like in a typical scenario in which the skin creator shares it with all his friends? Funny how that works out so well, huh?

  138. heh... by Danse · · Score: 2

    I was kinda thinking along those lines myself. If I was Lucas, I KNOW I wouldn't be able to resist the chance to fuck with the heads of a bunch of Star Wars geeks :) For all we know he could be laughing his ass off right now.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  139. Petition The BFP Crew by Fatal0E · · Score: 2

    to change their name to Attack the of the Alien BFP Clones just to piss everyone off

  140. Re:DONT JUST MODE HIM - TERMINATE HIM by erroneus · · Score: 0

    Speech comes in two forms:
    + popular
    + unpopular

    No one can agree 100% with which is which. Sometimes you are the moral majority, sometimes you're not. It's all a matter of when and where you are isn't it? When were the Christians the moral majority? Now? Yesterday? Where? Here? When were the Christians the moral minority? 2000 years ago? Where? Europe?

    Ever notice how no one (except communist china) is ever offended by Buddhism? That's probably because you don't see them backing their morals with guns, brutality and death. I say this because they are the model of peace and tollerance... mostly... Ever hear the expression "losing my religion?" You just lost yours the moment you decided to judge the "racist." Jesus didn't tell you to judge anyone. Jesus told you to love him. So piss off you hypocrite.

    BTW, I'm atheist but it doesn't make me wrong does it?

  141. Lookey what I found! by Fatal0E · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Lookey what I found! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try reading the url.

    2. Re:Lookey what I found! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try playing BFP. You can piss off an animation house, contribute to a slashdotting, promote pirated software and well, it's actually a pretty good mod!

  142. Bid for Power... by neema · · Score: 1

    What if the Bid for Power guys said that the video game wasn't based on Dragonball Z in the USA, but in Japan?

    1. Re:Bid for Power... by Jester998 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would matter. They're essentially the same thing; my understanding (I'm not a DBZ fan) is that Funimation LICENSES the DBZ name/characters/etc from KOEI. Since it's just a license, and not a separate "product" (or trademark, or whatever you want to call it), I don't think that tactic would work.

    2. Re:Bid for Power... by Jester998 · · Score: 1

      Whooops... I think that should've been TOEI, not KOEI... like I said, not a DBZ fan. I DO like KOEI's RPGs though.... :)

    3. Re:Bid for Power... by Pasty69 · · Score: 0

      That's up for someone else to decide if Funimation decided to pursue copyright violation. This has happened before numerous times before to other mods (most notably to the Quake2 version of Generations). Surprises me to see thsi get any kind of remark on Slashdot since it's a simple issue of copyright violation...

      --
      -Pasty
  143. Non-profit < > harmless by G+Codemonkey · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, I seem to recall the Aliens TC hack of Doom being MUCH more popular than the official first person shooter based on the Aliens world. It's doubtful that the official Aliens shooter would have been such a flop if the Doom Total Conversion had not been so well done.

    1. Re:Non-profit < > harmless by Glytch · · Score: 2

      The Aliens TC scared the hell out of me. Especially the first level. That was incredibly creepy the first time through.

      If there's any old-school Doom fans here who haven't played it yet, it's worth your time. >:)

  144. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by JoeShmoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Distributing DBZ eps...you have a case. Distributing fan scripts and stories? Then I don't think you should, even though the laws say you do.

    The whole purpose of the copyright laws were to encourage creativity. Things that extend or add to creative works (as long as their are clearly labeled to identify origin) should be allowed.

    - JoeShmoe

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  145. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you take something of mine and give it away I don't have it anymore, do I?

    But wait, with digital data I probably do. So the "theft" argument doesn't work (check the dictionary and you'll see that it requires the removal of property against the will of the owner... removal not copying).

  146. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

    That case could be made if the mod did in fact fall under the category of parody. However, it does not

    Says unimportant you. That's an opinion, not a fact.

    When I think Q3...I think ugly horrid monsters roaming castles and courtyards. DBZ seems a complete mockery of that. I mean, what if someone make a damn Pokemon Q3 mod? How about Strawberry Shortcake? At what point do we say, hey that's definitely different than the original work?

    - JoeShmoe

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  147. Star Wars predetermination by TACD · · Score: 1

    About that Star Wars title: I may be utterly wrong, but it was my knowledge that the entire series of Star Wars films was based on books which could not be fit into a single film. (You knew this, yeah?) So surely the title has already been decided by the title of the book? (Does anyone own the fabled tomes, who could confirm this?)

    --
    Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
    1. Re:Star Wars predetermination by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      I may be utterly wrong, but it was my knowledge that the entire series of Star Wars films was based on books which could not be fit into a single film.

      You're utterly wrong. The Star Wars films are based soley on scripts and story treatments written by George Lucas. Any Star Wars books you find were licensed after the fact.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
  148. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You have directly reused my property without recompense nor permission. It may not be called 'theft' in all cases but it all comes back to that point.

  149. Re:Helvetica by pressman · · Score: 1

    Wow! This is a new one to me. Aliased fonts? What is this 1985? And aliased TT fonts as well. Do yourself a favor and switch to using PS fonts!

    --
    Pooty tweet
  150. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  151. Re:Mod This Up With Insightful Please! by pressman · · Score: 1

    OOOOOOO! Helvetica! Now that's freaking original! Why don't you try Arial or Times or some other exotic font!? Why not go crazy and use Verdana or New York.
    Please! Helvetica has to be the MOST boring of all possible fonts! Vanilla, plain and simple.

    --
    Pooty tweet
  152. Another reasonably happy sucker. by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1

    Right on; and to think, all of this entertainment for the price of a few pairs of dollars.

    --

    (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

  153. Re:Christ, get a life & dictionary by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1
    At least if you're going to write to persuade someone, at least check your spelling and grammar!
    ...Attack of the Killer Tomato's".
    1. Remember, periods go inside the quotes.
    2. The apostrophe, despite 'conventional illiteracy' indicates possessiveness, not plurality.
    ...we just want it's title to do the same.
    • "It's" does not mean it possessive. It means "it is" -- a contraction.
    • Judging from the context of your sentence, I assume you mean the movie's title, not the title of the movie is "title."
    • In this case, you need to use "its" -- the proper form of it possessive.
    Final Grade:
    Content - B+
    Editing - D
    --
    Yeah, right.
  154. Lucas Film name by child_of_mercy · · Score: 3, Insightful
    doesn't Lucas have a history of messing around with his film names to slow the pirates down?

    He did it with Jedi

    Imagine the t-shirt presses of Shenzen are whirrin up right now with "Attack of the Clones".

    Be a bit of a blow to them if he changed the name a month before it opened.

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    1. Re:Lucas Film name by TACD · · Score: 1

      If Return of the Jedi was 'going to be' Revenge of the Jedi before it came out, perhaps Episode II will be called 'Attack of the Drones'. Or 'bones', perhaps? 'Defense of the Clones'? Ergh. Did Lucas ever mess with the names of the other films? 'Jedi' was a long time ago, and (personally) I wouldn't think he's likely to revive the idea now (especially since everyone knows about it) unless he also did it with Epsiode I. Anyone know the motive for the 'Jedi' name-switch; perhaps it was for a different reason than commonly thought?

      --
      Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
    2. Re:Lucas Film name by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      well he specifically said at the time that the reason for the "jedi" name switch was to screw with the unauthorised merchandise

      and he's only had Phantom Menace since then... (which he didn't screw around with but I think he did get burned by the dodgy merchandise)

      It's just a hypothesis.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  155. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Pasty69 · · Score: 0

    But FUNimation would go after someone if they distributed a script that they wanted to use. It's all about what FUNimation think they can make money off of that they atack.

    --
    -Pasty
  156. copyright by delmoi · · Score: 2

    'fanfic', or other sorts of 'takeoff's arn't covered by copyright.

    --

    ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  157. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Pasty69 · · Score: 0

    You can create and distribute anything DBZ related that you want. As soon as you make something that FUNimation wants to make money off of they will say "HEY! Don't do that because you are stealing out profits!" and the C&D letters come out. If you make a winamp skin (aren't all you other /. people linux? I thought I was the only one using winamp =P ) nobody is going to say "Damnit that's 5.4MILLION dollars I'm losing on the winamp skin industry. They signed with Infogrames to make a DBZ game, so BFP is taking their profits, how simple is this? Copyright violation in an easy to swallow capsule!

    --
    -Pasty
  158. Beat Deep Fritz? by hkka · · Score: 1

    Thats unpossible! There are a thousand paths that have never yet been trodden--a thousand healths and hidden isles of life. Even now, man and man's earth are unexhausted and undiscovered. -- Nietzsche

  159. Game modifications and cease & desist letters by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

    I first went beyond BBSs to the Internet around the time Doom came out, because I found out about a Star Wars Total Conversion. By the time I tracked down the right message boards, etc... I had found that the original group of developers had given up because LucasArts had sent them cease and desist letters. However, LucasArts at the time was developing a Doom-ish Star Wars game, "Dark Forces," so they had a little more interest than Funimation.

    For a while, I picked up where the original Star Wars conversion people left off, made a website and everything, and made lotsa progress, but never once received a negative communication from anyone with a commercial interest.

    After a crappy Dragonball Z game comes out with proper licensing, I have a feeling no one will care if better or different stuff is released later. :-)

  160. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by JoeShmoe · · Score: 1

    FUNimation would have no rights to a script that someone else wrote. Fanscripts are still copyright the script author, even though technically according to current laws the scripts themselves are infringing on the copyright of the characters themselves. It's a fine line and a stupid one at that.

    - JoeShmoe

    --
    -- I wonder which will go down in history as the bigger failure: the War on Drugs or the War on Filesharing
  161. Re:DONT JUST MODE HIM - TERMINATE HIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs hell?

    Retards like yourself seem more than capable of turning this planet into something even more impressive than some mythical lake of fire. Really. By the time you are done with the world, hell will be a eternal vacation resort... especially if you aren't there.

  162. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    OK, it's my opinion that the DBZ mod is not parody. So what? Most reasonable people would agree. The important thing is intent. Was the DMZ mod intended to be a parody of DragonBallZ? The answer is no.

    Every time something like this comes on Slashdot, some idiot always says "no, no, we can use this unrelated piece of legislation to get around the law in this case". Forget it. You can't. This is just nerd hubris. Do you really think an experienced judge would accept transparent lies like "oh, it is supposed to be parody"?

  163. Thank you. by sulli · · Score: 2
    I agree. "Attack of the Clones" is just fucking fine. It's only a movie!

    Even "Star Wars" is a hokey name. That's the point, isn't it?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  164. Thank you (Re:Grammar Nazi, again.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great link, great site.

    My life had almost gotten normal :)

    Excellent.

  165. Re:Stephen King, author, dead at 54 by unitron · · Score: 2
    "Is there some secret cabal between the fake-story trolls and newbie moderators that we were previously unaware of?"

    You mean other than being the same people with multiple accounts?

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  166. Re:Dragonball Foxed? No, stupid developers by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > When I think Q3...I think ugly horrid monsters roaming castles and courtyards.

    ...so you think Funimation shouldn't have sued, but ID Software should have? :-)

    > DBZ seems a complete mockery of that. I mean, what if someone make a damn Pokemon Q3 mod?

    Besides, there are probably plenty of parents of school-aged sproggen would pay good money to blast Pikachu into a mountain of gibs ;)

    (Shit, I loved lobbing a stream of rockets into Barney the Dinosaur in that DOOM wad... and I don't even have kids!)

  167. Not so silly. by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    If you really think about it, "Star Wars" sounds sort of silly to begin with.

  168. well, by Tom7 · · Score: 1

    At least in my mind, "Return of the ___" and "The ____ Strikes Back" were pioneered by the Star Wars series. Attack of the Clones seems derivative at this point.

    It's a silly name (I thought it read, "Attack of the Clowns" at first), but it sure isn't petition-worthy.