Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Episode I DVD Review

dswensen writes: "Theforce.net has an in-depth review of the forthcoming Star Wars: Episode I DVD (due for release October 16th). Looking at all the great features packed into this DVD, I'm glad Lucas decided not to just toss off a cheap version a year ago. Love it or hate it, it looks like they really pulled out all the stops." Plus Ant points out that there is some teaser movie available for Star Wars Galaxies, the upcoming massively multiplayer game.

209 comments

  1. fncp by trollercoaster · · Score: 0, Funny

    first non-censored psot! w00t!

    --

    Slashdot, come for the goatse, stay for the trolls.

  2. Okay, but.... by Migelikor1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We still haven't seen the original trilogy that didn't suck on DVD, and there is no plan to release it. I find it somewhat ridickulous.

    --
    My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
    1. Re:Okay, but.... by Tet · · Score: 2
      We still haven't seen the original trilogy that didn't suck on DVD


      Yep. I've got the complete set three times on video. The original set, plus the special editions, in both normal and widescreen. Even so, if they were on DVD, I'd buy them tomorrow. I'm sure I can't be alone in that.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    2. Re:Okay, but.... by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere the other day that Lucas has said their won't be any original trilogy DVD's until at least 2005, after Episode 3 is done. And your right, they'll probably be those "improved" versions at that, with even more stuff thrown in if this Ep1 DVD is any indication.

      It's too bad Lucas has apparently decided his original work is crap, and has become obsessed with what his big machines up there on the ranch can do. A boxed set of the original trilogy, in it's original form, would probably be one of the best selling DVD sets of all time.

      Dammit George, I don't care if you originally wanted yet another big-headed alien in the cantina, or you can see the strings on the Tie Fighters in Frame 2045-78. Give me Digitally remastered, Dolby 5.1/DTS Star Wars, Empire, and Jedi, and you'll be the Geek Hero you once were.

    3. Re:Okay, but.... by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Informative
      • We still haven't seen the original trilogy that didn't suck on DVD, and there is no plan to release it

      ...until after episodes 2 & 3 are out. Wierdly, Amazon has the DVD of Episode 4 listed, complete with ASIN number.

      But sure, let's have it, George. Heck, I'd settle for being able to get pristine VHS tapes of the unbutchered versions.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:Okay, but.... by connorbd · · Score: 2

      You know, I have to disagree -- with the exception of Greedo shooting first (a very badly rendered addition to ANH as well as a bad idea) and giving the Sarlaac a proper mouth (also a little pointless, especially as it broke a number of fanfics and even a book or two), the special editions were actually very well done. The Ewok village at the end of Jedi is much improved, Cloud city is a much brighter place, the picture quality is vastly enhanced... on the whole, I have no trouble accepting SW:SE as Lucas' definitive vision of the movies.

      The only objection I have to the Special Edition versions of the movies is that they gave Lucas license to go crazy in TPM; after all, if he could digitally map Jabba into ANH, he could get away with pretty much anything, which he tried to in TPM. And so we got Jar Jar Binks...

      /Brian

    5. Re:Okay, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and giving the Sarlaac a proper mouth (also a little pointless, especially as it broke a number of fanfics and even a book or two"

      Have you been outside recently? Apparantly theres a war on!

    6. Re:Okay, but.... by Brad+Wilson · · Score: 1

      I've had the THX remastered Laserdiscs for years (the most recent versions). No 5.1, unfortunately, but even so, outstanding sound and picture quality (and none of the lame ass additions).

      Similarly, I have the Laserdisc of Phantom Menace (Japanese import) in 6.1EX audio. Amazing picture and sound. Extras aren't worth re-buying for. I rarely ever watch extras. I have enough to watch with just the movies! :)

  3. Its like I told my Mom... by BiggestPOS · · Score: 1
    Yes, I may bitch about how much I "hated" Episode I, but I'll be damned if I didn't pre-order the VHS (lost it too, dammit!) now I'll be damned if I don't order the DVD.... Its only money.

    --
    What, me worry?
    1. Re:Its like I told my Mom... by alen · · Score: 1

      I got into DVD before the VHS came out and swore never to buy VHS again. I broke down once when I bought the OT on ebay for $10.

    2. Re:Its like I told my Mom... by rm-r · · Score: 1

      And that's way Lucas can't be bothered to make Episodes 2 and 3 any good (just like he didn't with Episode 1. You dumb fanboys will be in the queue anyway, buy the tacky merchandise (which is meant for 6 year olds) and he'll laugh all the way home to the ranch- via the bank

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
  4. Great DVD, so-so movie by alen · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Maybe it was too hyped before release, but I was kind of let down when I saw. Maybe it's because George Lucas had such a strong role in the movie. My favorite is still ESB.

    1. Re:Great DVD, so-so movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer Pale Ales over ESBs, but you'll find me drinking the ESB if the only other choice is a Hefeweizen.

  5. Special PS2 Edition by INicheI · · Score: 0

    Now I would love to see some sort of special edition DVD for the PS2. They could add some cool stuff, and make it awsome.

  6. Why the delay? by Chazmati · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He probably postponed it so he could include some teasers of Episode 2...

    1. Re:Why the delay? by PhatAir · · Score: 1
      Nah, the more cynical among us would say that he delayed it so that everyone would buy 2 copies - the VHS one when it first came out, and the DVD one for the better quality footage and extras.

      2 copies = twice the revenue

    2. Re:Why the delay? by bribecka · · Score: 1

      I think that Lucasfilm wanted to make sure that DVD was going to "take"--that it wouldn't become another laserdisc. Even 1.5 years ago, DVD was pretty new to most people. And since it takes quite a bit of time to put a disc like this together, you have a LONG wait.

      And if there is a teaser of Episode 2, it will be well worth the wait IMHO!

      --

      Where are we going and why am I in this handbasket?

    3. Re:Why the delay? by Loligo · · Score: 1

      >He probably postponed it so he could include
      >some teasers of Episode 2...

      Somehow, I think the drooling fanboys of TFN would have mentioned this.

      -l

    4. Re:Why the delay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What, The Fishing Network?

      http://www.the-fishing-network.com/

  7. Film master? by melatonin · · Score: 1
    The transfer of the film has been painstakingly reproduced on the digital format directly from the original film master.

    Didn't Lucas have a digital master of this movie? I know a significant portion of the movie was digital anyway, and I thought he was going to run the rest of the film through digital processing so he could get a digital master.

    --
    Moderators should have to take a reading comprehension test.
    1. Re:Film master? by aslagle · · Score: 1

      The Digital Bits has an interview with the people responsible for mastering the Ep. I DVD (as well as George Lucas), and they stated that the transfer was done from film (and not direct from digital) because they wanted the tonal qualities the film transfer gave them. Apparently Lucas et al. aren't as much behind the all-digital concept as they're saying...

    2. Re:Film master? by nytes · · Score: 1

      Ep 1 was shot on film, and transferred to digital for test screenings around the US.

      Ep 2 will be the first one to be digital from start to finish.

      --
      -- I have monkeys in my pants.
  8. What about the Jar-Jar-free version ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was eagerly expecting this feature.

  9. RCE disc by onion2k · · Score: 2

    Yeah, but its going to be an RCE disc, and it isn't going to work on a region 0 multi-region player..

    1. Re:RCE disc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those of us who are unenlightend, explain what the heck is an "RCE disc"? Thanks in advance.

    2. Re:RCE disc by alen · · Score: 1

      I'm not 100% sure, but an RCE disk is locked only for Region 1. It won't play in region free or non-region 1 players. Just another feature of the movie studios.

      I usually support patents, trademarks and copyrights but this is way too far. People pay extra for the region free players and that money goes to the studios as a tax. And they use it to develop rce disks.

    3. Re:RCE disc by CiaranMc · · Score: 1

      Then buy one of the European versions - all RCE disks so far have been R1. If they made R2 RCE discs, half the people in R2 wouldn't be able to watch them...

    4. Re:RCE disc by sph · · Score: 1

      Well, then buy R2/R4 version if your equipment can handle PAL. It's definitely not RCE. You also get better vertical resolution and smoother movement with PAL, and the actual disc features should be exactly the same. There is a review of R2/R4 version of the disc at MichaelDVD, and they seem to consider video transfer rather disappointing. And about RCE... My modified Sony chooses region automatically (also works with RCE discs), yet lets to override manually. No protection can fool good hand-selection without breaking compatibility with "legit" players as well.

    5. Re:RCE disc by fyonn · · Score: 1

      people pay extra for region free players (assuming it's a hardware hack) but the money doesn't go to the studio's at all. they'd rather you couldn't mod dvd players. the money pays for the parts and labour to replace the bios or change the jumpers or spill solder all over the mobo etcetc.

      dave

    6. Re:RCE disc by Malc · · Score: 2

      "I'm not 100% sure, but an RCE disk is locked only for Region 1. It won't play in region free or non-region 1 players. Just another feature of the movie studios. "

      I think that you're right. I believe the scripting on the DVD disc asks the player which region it is, and then compares the response to what it thinks it is.

    7. Re:RCE disc by gumbo · · Score: 1
      I think that you're right. I believe the scripting on the DVD disc asks the player which region it is, and then compares the response to what it thinks it is.

      Right. Since RCE discs have been around for a while, there are lots of DVD players that let you pick the region you want it to be at the moment (through an on-screen menu if you're lucky.) For others that are firmware flashable from a CD-R, you can just flash the player back to R1 to play an RCE disc, and then flash it to R0 to play other discs.

  10. Re:Star Wars game by or_smth · · Score: 1

    10 bucks a month for endless replay value is not what I consider a nominal fee. Not to say that most new MMORPGs (everquest) don't suck though, because they do.

  11. Why aren't the orginals on DVD yet? by peripatetic_bum · · Score: 1

    This question has been bugging me for a bit,

    as I can think of no real reasonn why the
    first Star Wars episodes arent out on DVD?

    What reason can there be for delaying them?

    I am sure it has something to do with money,

    but just how long does lucas think he will wait?

    Thanks for reading

    --

    Sigs are dangerous coy things

    1. Re:Why aren't the orginals on DVD yet? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      If you read Lucas's quotes on various sources you would know he was looking at not releasing the original trilogy until 2005 with the release of Episode III. The man is busy, for crying out loud. Do you really think he has time to put together great packages for the other three movies when he's working on Episodes II & III? Think about the amount of work it will take to get all the extras digitized and cleaned up. We aren't talking small projects, and Lucas wants to be involved. Be patient.

    2. Re:Why aren't the orginals on DVD yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Think about the amount of work it will take to get all the extras digitized and cleaned up

      Cleaned up: none, they did it for the special editions.

      Digitized: none for Lucas, it's a job for the tecchies.
      Lucas wants to be involved
      Oh, bollocks. That means they're going to be crap. The man is a walking turd with a beard. Let Kasdan do it!
    3. Re:Why aren't the orginals on DVD yet? by peripatetic_bum · · Score: 1


      Acutally, I dont believe the reasons he states. It's quite clear from the pap that was episode one that the one thing this man is not is busy.

      Oh I'm sure he's busy in the sense of tbeing busy in making as much money as he can, but from the crap he added to the original episodes to the drivel that was episode one, He is not busy with anything to do with the acutall making of star wars.

      Take a good look at episode and see that it was pure drivel from someone who never gave a thought to what made star wars "Star Wars."

      All this crap about how he's cleaning this and remastering that is fine, but I doubt he himself is doing any of it. As for being busy doing epsidoes 2 and 3, again doubtful since it appears he doesnt do any directing (even when he claims a director's credit)

      In short, Lucad is not busy.

      --

      Sigs are dangerous coy things

    4. Re:Why aren't the orginals on DVD yet? by CS_Snapple · · Score: 1

      And what about the Indiana Jones trilogy?

      The only thing I can think of is that George Lucas already has all our money. Maybe he's biding his time until we have a little more to spend.

      No ticket.

    5. Re:Why aren't the orginals on DVD yet? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      Kasdan? What are you smoking? Kasdan cowrote the screenplays for ESB and ROTJ, that's all. He never directed a movie.

      Secondly, I really suggest you two look at what type of work Lucas puts in on his projects - the man is involved, even when he isn't the director, from step one to the premiere. Lucas is a pretty impressive man all things considered: an active, inloved father of three kids (who he, BTW, has sole custody of); involed in numerous Lucasfilm projects; and he is a busy businessman. So he makes money - cool. I wish I could come up with a concept that would allow me to fund my own major motion pictures out of my own pocket and ensure a strong profit.

  12. If only he could write... by DudeTheMath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If only the movie were any good. Lucas should get Kasdan in on this one, too. "Yippee," indeed.

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
  13. With all this new technology... by baronben · · Score: 1

    Couldn't ILM find some way to remove Jar Jar?

    1. Re:With all this new technology... by Malc · · Score: 1

      Just be glad it's only Jar-Jar. It couldn't have been worse, he could have put Ewoks in the film and really gone for the child market. I can't watch Return of the Jedi because of them.

  14. What's an RCE disc? by jonr · · Score: 1

    ...and why can't I play them on a multi-region player? If this is true, I'll not buy it. To me it would be defective disc.

    1. Re:What's an RCE disc? by Jungleland · · Score: 2, Informative

      Region Code Enhanced. It basically tells the player that it is region 0 disk(so the player switches to region 0), then during the menu sequence checks that the player is region 1. The Idea being that only region 1 locked players will be able to play. I have heard that a lot of mods get around this, mine for example wont change to Region 0, so in theory it should work. All of the RCE disks so far have been crap so I havent tested this so far.

  15. Star Wars Galaxies teaser... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was one hell of a Lego commercial... it's a one minute video with about 15 seconds of LEGO toys, 15 seconds of company logos, and 30 seconds of ingame footage that isn't that different from the pictures already on the webpage...

    maybe if it showed some game combat...

    --Loco3KGT

  16. RCE not necessarily a problem. by dmaxwell · · Score: 2

    It depends on the player. There are patched BIOS files for the Apex600A that allow RCE disks to work if the player is in Region 0 mode. Also, it isn't too hard to put mulitple BIOSen in many players and switch between them. RCE is ineffective on players that can actually be switched to a target region. I would assume by now that many players other than the Apex have been hacked to deal with this.

    1. Re:RCE not necessarily a problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, "boxen" is gay enough, but "BIOSen"? Holy fuck. What's wrong with you dirty beast-bearded GNU hippies anyway?

  17. not at all biased, no... by Scryber · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is there anything about Star Wars that the TheForce.net doesn't wet their pants over? Granted, the DVD is chock full of stuff, but it could've been encoded as MPEG-1 and they still would have been flipping out about how great it is.

  18. Bad review by lambent · · Score: 1

    This is the most childish and unprofessional review I have ever read. The editorials in the college newspaper I read this morning deserve more respect than this. It reads like a fanboy's wet dream.

    The only criticism with the quality is that it does look perhaps a bit more static and less life-like or organic than film. It's a small price to pay for the clarity we've never been able to appreciate before.

    One of the biggest drawbacks to the cinematography, in my opinion, was that the CGI did not look real enough. And if it didn't look real in the theatre, how much worse will it be on my TV? I remember the original glowing reviews before the film made wide release. And many people ended up complaining about how the film did not live up to hype and expectation. This hyper, Lucas-worshipping review points out the analogy clearly enough for me.

    1. Re:Bad review by Kizeh · · Score: 1

      I'm not willing to go quite that far, but, well, the movie wasn't particularly great. No matter how well you package it, it still isn't particularly great. In fact it was remarkably mediocre.

    2. Re:Bad review by Stormie · · Score: 2

      In fact it was remarkably mediocre.


      In fact, the only way this DVD could not suck is if you got a copy which accidentally had a different movie pressed onto it.


  19. Has the reviewer ever seen a good DVD before? by Keelor · · Score: 2
    Yes, it's great that that Ep. 1 is coming out on DVD, and that the DVD is not one of those throw-in-the-PR-crap-and-some-random-cast-member's -commentary items. However, the tone of voice that the reviewer uses seems to imply that DVD features that have been standard for high-quality DVD's have never appeared until now.


    And while around 90% of the movie remains identical to the theatrical version, it appears that George can't leave the film alone.

    Yes, it's called the director's cut. I'm personally all for them, but they even appeared back in the days of *gasp* VHS. And some people might be a tad bit annoyed that they can't get the version that they saw in theaters on DVD.
    Make a special point to know that the DVD is divided into 50 chapters for those that want to pinpoint the moment they are looking for in a flash. It goes against traditional thinking, but mass chapter listing is quite possibly a new trend for franchise films to start following.

    50 does seem higher than many DVDs, I'll give that. But there is a point that's it's too much--you spend more time flipping through the channel selection (there's no way they show all 50 chapters on one screen) than actually watching the scene you want to see.
    ...instead of having just Dolby 2.0, like the VHS version, DVDs with a moderate home theater will enjoy the vibrancy of Dolby 5.1 Surround EX.

    Yes, I'm fairly sure I've heard of the rare DVD have 5.1 surround sound.

    The fully animated menus are terrific and randomly reflect (or when chosen) the unique planets of the movies.

    I can't make a judgement here, since the reviewer doesn't mention the only aspect I truly care about with menus: do I have to spend 8 hours watching flashy menu transitions just to watch the movie? On the other hand, if the DVD bucks this trend, it's approximately the only DVD in existence that does, and I salute the makers.


    As for the huge wait, I would like to point out that this DVD seems ~about the same level in terms of effort as the Gladiator DVD, which was a 2-disc set released simultaneously with the VHS version. If Lucas was _so_ intent on spending hours upon hours to make this DVD, I don't quite understand why they didn't release a standard DVD (with the usual "extra" of 5.1 surround sound and widescreen) at the same time as the VHS, and then market this as the Director's Cut/Collector's Edition, which it obviously is.


    ~=Keelor

    1. Re:Has the reviewer ever seen a good DVD before? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3
      • since the reviewer doesn't mention the only aspect I truly care about with menus: do I have to spend 8 hours watching flashy menu transitions just to watch the movie

      Or in the case of Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, see a spoiler of the end of the movie!. Yes, this irritates the hell out of me as well. I wonder why they think it's necessary.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    2. Re:Has the reviewer ever seen a good DVD before? by tb3 · · Score: 2

      Obviously not, since he is a Star Wars fan-boy, and this is the first Star Wars DVD. It's a whole new world to him.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    3. Re:Has the reviewer ever seen a good DVD before? by jhoffoss · · Score: 2

      I'm wondering how long it took this reviewer to pull his/her lips off of the proverbial ass of LucasFilm...

      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
    4. Re:Has the reviewer ever seen a good DVD before? by Malc · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Dolby 5.1 Surround EX involve an extra speaker. If so, shouldn't it be called Dolby Digital 6.1? I don't think that Dolby Digity EX is quite as common on discs as Dolby Digital... but for most us, we won't be able to tell the difference as we only have 5.1 speakers.

    5. Re:Has the reviewer ever seen a good DVD before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed that; fortunately I saw the movie in the theatre before owning the DVD; hope not too many people had the movie spoiled because of that menu, it is a truly great film.

  20. Good things about episode 1 by 0-9a-zA-Y_.+!*'(),-$ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually, there were quite a few things I liked about Episode I.
    First of all, he established the groundwork for what are sure to be two very dark and combat-filled movies.
    Also, the lightsaber fight at the end was the best filmed so far.
    Even during a second viewing, I was still laughing every time I saw the "thin client" attack droids in action. IMHO, anybody who doesn't think an entire army of Crow T. Robots getting their asses kicked by lizzard men is funny needs to lighten up a little. That battle alone was worth my seven bucks.
    On the downside, turning The Force into super-intelligent germs was a huge mistake. In two brief scenes, he ruined the whole series by turning a beautifully impossible fantasy into a very implausable sci-fi load of crap.
    This was even less forgivable than the cartoony Jar Jar, the Bat-Grapling-Guns that Amidala's royal guard used, or the fact that Brian Blessed (voice of the Gungan King) put in the corniest performance of his carreer since his hammy appearance in Flash Gordon.

    --
    Everything but Z
    1. Re:Good things about episode 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First of all, he established the groundwork for what are sure to be two very dark and combat-filled movies.
      Or they could be two very shitty toy commercials. The distinction being that good movies for kids can still be enjoyed by adults (eg Shrek), whereas crappy Beard-Boy toy commercials can't.
    2. Re:Good things about episode 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or they could be two very shitty toy commercials© The distinction being that good movies for kids can still be enjoyed by adults ¥eg Shrek, whereas crappy Beard-Boy toy commercials can't©

      The sad thing is, it was even shitty for some kids© How many kids can follow the politics of a trade embargo? The cheesy plot was based on something children don't want to deal with©

    3. Re:Good things about episode 1 by connorbd · · Score: 2

      I don't know; calling the attack droids "thin clients" is probably funnier than anything in the movie...

      /Brian

    4. Re:Good things about episode 1 by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

      On the downside, turning The Force into super-intelligent germs was a huge mistake.

      Yeah, that midi-chlorox stuff was crap.
      I think Lucas could have handled the detection better with something like a PKE meter, leaving the Force as pure mysticism, rather than trying to explain it pseudo-scientifically.

      I could care less about the E1 DVD, I want the original trilogy on DVD.

      C-X C-S

    5. Re:Good things about episode 1 by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
      First of all, he established the groundwork for what are sure to be two very dark and combat-filled movies.


      Excellent point. Most people tried to evaluate Ep. 1 in isolation, forgetting the overall story arc. The Phantom Menace had to start out "up" (which apparently means childish to Lucas). Otherwise, there would be no reference point for the downward spiral to come. I'd be willing to bet that Ep. 3 will be darker than Empire Strikes Back, and a marathon viewing of all six episodes will make Jar-Jar a little easier to tolerate, as he can then be seen in the context of the greater story.

      ...Brian Blessed (voice of the Gungan King) put in the corniest performance of his carreer since his hammy appearance in Flash Gordon.


      Have we forgotten his scenery-chewing cameo in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves? :-)
      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    6. Re:Good things about episode 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > On the downside, turning The Force into super-intelligent germs was a huge mistake.

      Yeah, that midi-chlorox stuff was crap.

      I think Lucas could have handled the detection better with something like a PKE meter, leaving the Force as pure mysticism, rather than trying to explain it pseudo-scientifically.

      Historically, people have made innumerable theories that were later proved wrong. Could it not be that the Jedi Council (who are obviously not omniscient) made up this (incorrect) theory to explain things? Perhaps these so-called "super-intelligent germs" are merely particularly Force-attuned creatures that tend to congregate towards those most attuned to the Force? This would also explain why the midi-whatsits aren't mentioned at all in the original trilogy... it was an old theory that was later debunked (or forgotten, with the disbanding of the Council).

      I'm not entirely sure that Lucas is planning to explain it off like this (episode 1 did not particularly impress me, and I am somewhat questioning his story-writing ability at this point). However, it does fit the facts, and keeps the Force mystical, not scientific, so it is the interpretation I am going to stand by.

    7. Re:Good things about episode 1 by then,+it+was+nigh · · Score: 1

      Have we forgotten his scenery-chewing cameo in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves? :-)

      I dunno, I still think that whole King Yrcanos thing from the "Mindwarp" segment of "Trial of a Time Lord" takes the cake.

      --
      sed 's/In Soviet Russia/In NSA America/g' < yakov-smirnoff-jokes.txt
    8. Re:Good things about episode 1 by droleary · · Score: 1

      Historically, people have made innumerable theories that were later proved wrong. Could it not be that the Jedi Council (who are obviously not omniscient) made up this (incorrect) theory to explain things? Perhaps these so-called "super-intelligent germs" are merely particularly Force-attuned creatures that tend to congregate towards those most attuned to the Force? This would also explain why the midi-whatsits aren't mentioned at all in the original trilogy... it was an old theory that was later debunked (or forgotten, with the disbanding of the Council).

      Excellent points. Another thing to consider is that Lucas has to somehow turn the Jedi from a respected galactic diplomatic/religious organization into a laughable, "hokey" band of outcasts in the span of, what, 25 years? Mistakes in proclamations like these ("the universe revolves around the Earth" anyone?) are often used as evidence against a religion's claims as a bearer of truth. I expect it'll be used as ammunition by the Empire, or otherwise debunked.

  21. Other 'Missing' DVD titles by Masem · · Score: 2

    Also conspicuously missing from DVD releases are two major triologies: Back to the Future, and Indiana Jones. You'd think having both of these out as well as SW on DVD, all in maximum featuritis, would help to improve the acceptance of DVD.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    1. Re:Other 'Missing' DVD titles by aslagle · · Score: 1

      Currently, according to the CEA, there are 20,235,574 DVD players in the market (as of 9/18/01 - U.S. only. Divx included. DVD-ROM & PS2 not included).

      DVD is the fastest growing consumer electronic product launch in history. 20 million units in 4.5 years!

      A few SF trilogies not being out aren't having much of an effect on the DVD market.

    2. Re:Other 'Missing' DVD titles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm I read that BTTF will be out next year.

    3. Re:Other 'Missing' DVD titles by Monte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Currently, according to the CEA, there are 20,235,574 DVD players in the market (as of 9/18/01 - U.S. only. Divx included.

      Both of them?

    4. Re:Other 'Missing' DVD titles by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      Also conspicuously missing from DVD releases are two major triologies: Back to the Future, and Indiana Jones.

      And this is the kind of bullshit that is pressing people to buy bootleg copies. Do you know how easy it is to get these films on DVD? They were released on laserdisc; you can find nice DVD transfers just about anywhere. I already own Star Wars on VHS and I'll tell you what, if Lucas continues to take his sweet ass time in releasing the DVD, eventually I'm just going to up and order myself some bootlegs. My VHS copies are getting worn out and I want to watch a digital version without buying a used laserdisc player. If I have to buy bootlegs Lucas can bite my ass on a real release, because I won't buy it. Same thing applies to BTTF and Indiana Jones.

      Just release the movies on DVD already. I don't get what this bullshit hold up is. It shouldn't take years to release these films, considering they've already been released on laserdisc.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    5. Re:Other 'Missing' DVD titles by FaasNat · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Back to the Future, but definitely Indiana Jones. Is there some sort of restriction preventing these films from being distributed on DVD?

      --
      There's never enough when you have too little
    6. Re:Other 'Missing' DVD titles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a bit from an interview with Bob Gale which seems to explain the absence of those DVDs.

      BTTF.com:
      Well, I couldn't claim to be the Back to the Future fan that I am if I didn't ask you a few questions about that wonderful series. The Back to the Future trilogy remains one of the most popular film series of all times, and as with the other popular trilogies out there, the films are not yet available on DVD. Are you involved with the development of these films finally being released on DVD, and if so, what are you at liberty to discuss as far as planned features, expected release dates, etc.?

      Bob Gale:
      When Mr. Bronfman was running Universal, he did a really dumb thing. He sold all the foreign DVD rights of Universal's product to Columbia for a three year window. He didn't believe in the DVD format. So when Jaws is sold in France, Columbia makes the money. Well, Universal has lost a ton of potential money on this, so they decided to hold back the release of some of their best stuff until that deal expires. I'm not sure when that is, but it may be at the end of the year. Once that happens, you can expect some high profile library stuff, including the BTTF movies to come to market. It's certainly our desire to do Special Editions, with commentary, trailers and anything else that makes sense to put on the discs...there's EPK stuff, and maybe we can locate the B-roll on some of that. Bob and I also did on-camera interviews for BTTF about 3 or 4 years ago, so I'm sure the home video departmant has that somewhere. But there's no set plan yet, or budget. Bob and I are huge DVD fans, so we'll make sure that they'll be quality products. By the way, we recently did a commentary track for Used Cars with Kurt Russell in on it -- that DVD's supposed to come out in October.

  22. Bonus feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anyone else think that as a bonus feature they should have included the video for Weird Al's "The Saga Begins"?

  23. Biased source by Wind_Walker · · Score: 1
    Don't you guys think that it's a little strange to see a Star Wars site reviewing a Star Wars movie and giving it a 96/100 rating? I mean, what we have here is a group of fanboys (for lack of a better term) who are just fawning over things that 95% of people really don't care that much about.

    When I decide whether a DVD is right for me, I look at the technical details; I'm looking for sound quality, picture quality, framerates, ease of navigation, and other technical aspects. Yes, the movie is important, but not nearly as important as quality; that's what DVDs are all about! It's great that they included new scenes, but who cares about it if the picture is shoddy and the sound poor?

    I mean, it would be like CmdrTaco reviewing the latest Linux release... oh, wait a minute...

    1. Re:Biased source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I mean, it would be like CmdrTaco reviewing the latest Linux release

      Taco would only give good reviews to distros with apt.

  24. Another Review by krugdm · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're looking for another review that doesn't involve Force.net drool, here's one from The Digital Bits which has a lot of the same information, but some different criticisms.

    1. Re:Another Review by wossName · · Score: 1
      Something I found even more amusing than the drooling over standard DVD features was the author's opinion on the documentary:

      "... It is surprisingly honest and candid, with far more revealing moments than I ever anticipated. [...] My greatest disappointment was Rick McCallum continually using curse words in the feature - directly contrary to the fanfare of TPM being a kid's movie and the like. Fortunately Lucasfilm did have the foresight to bleep most of the offending words, but it still detracted very much from an almost perfect documentary."

      Surprised when your featurette turned out to be more of a documentary ?
      --
      Someone is wrong on the Internet!
    2. Re:Another Review by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • If you're looking for another review that doesn't involve Force.net drool

      Well, to be fair, there's no point in giving anything like a critical review of the movie itself. You've either seen it before, or you're not going to see it, love it, hate it, or are bored hearing about it. But, that said, it really is appalingly sycophantic.

      • But don't worry, the podrace has never looked better. [...] Podracers roar like never before and you will appreciate the nuance of sound design. Laser blasts and the roar of the crowd fill the rear channels and the subwoofer roars appropriately. [...] including a major sequence around the podrace a second time with Anakin losing control of his pod and Sebulba getting his flamethrower out and trashing other contestants in the Boonta Eve race. You'll be greeted by several new racers, new pods and plenty more action in the Deleted Scenes section

      Sounds like someone's got a real Pod Racer hangup (George or Joshua, the reviewer, or both). It's just one scene, dudes. In fact, it's (to my eyes) a shoddy, dull and overlong scene, cynically designed to look a lot like the game it was intended to sell. Hey ho.

      • In this copy the documentation was not included but will probably lean more towards functionality and less on innovation

      Does it scare anyone else that there's any question that a DVD needs "functional documentation"? ;)

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Another Review by bigdavex · · Score: 1
      From the Digital Bits review:
      There are two reasons for this. The first is an abundance of visible film grain present in the print.
      That strikes me as odd; wasn't Ep. I shot digitally? I would have thought that there wouldn't be a film stage in this process. Anybody know the story here?
      --
      -Dave
    4. Re:Another Review by g0del · · Score: 1

      According to the producer of the dvd, there was a conscious decision to use the film master for the transfer, instead of the digital master. More information can be found in an interview with him here G0del

    5. Re:Another Review by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks!

      --
      -Dave
    6. Re:Another Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      TheDigitalBits sucks. Most of their reviews are 99% a review of the movie itself, and 1% a review of the actual DVD. And the one or two scant sentences that are dedicated to picture/sound quality show a severe lack of technical knowledge. Just look at that review you linked to. He actually thinks he's seeing film grain on the DVD! If he's too ignorant to know that the grain size of modern film stocks is far, far smaller than an individual pixel of the puny 720x480 image of a DVD, he should not be brazenly declaring "We Know DVD" on the front page of his site.

      The only place I've found that acutally does an even moderately good job of reviewing DVDs is the Internet Movie Database. Just look as some the reviews by Michael Hafner that appear there. Now there is someone who actually has (some) technical knowledge, and attempts to provide something approaching real criticism. He's certainly not the best reviewer imaginable, but at least he's better than the guys who run TheDigitalBits.

  25. Worth to purchase a DVD player for by ballpoint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The Episode I DVD is even worth your investment in a DVD player if you have continued to delay the purchase."

    Well, I decided to go all the way to setup a full-size, no expenses spared, home theater nearly two years ago, just to be able to see 'The Fifth Element' again.

    Since my family and I have been watching hundreds of rented movies on DVD, and we all agree that the investment has been utterly worthwhile.

    Why invest $10000 in a home theater when you can go and see a movie on a much bigger screen with a family of four for $25 ?

    Well, there are a couple of reasons:

    • At $22 saved on every movie, I'll recoup my investment in 5 years.
    • I can see movies again in their former glory, which is not possible with a VHS tape and a television screen.
    • DVD extra features sometimes provide valuable insight in the movie-making process, and make you appreciate the typically enourmous efforts required.
    • Carefully chosen and positioned speakers provide an audio treat you won't find in a theater filled with a popcorn-popping and coughing audience.
    • I prefer the comfort and security of my home. Best of all, I can sip a cocktail while watching.

    All said, even if this movie isn't going to make anyone go out and buy a DVD player, I'm glad it's finally there.

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
    1. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by alen · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the money saved from not paying theter prices on foods in the popcorn, sugar, fat, butter and soft drink food groups. But since you won't be buying 3 liter cokes at $6 each with free refills you may not be getting the best value.

    2. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $10000?!!!?

      fuck you, dumb richfuck. people out there are starving, and you pay 10k for a TV. You make me sick.

    3. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by Malc · · Score: 1

      "I prefer the comfort and security of my home. Best of all, I can sip a cocktail while watching."

      You certainly can't play "The Force" game in the cinema. Yes, that's right: get all the Star Wars discs (ok, tapes for now) and watch them one after the other. Everytime you hear the words "The Force", down a drink. See if you can remember the Ewoks the next day? Fortunately, I can't ;)

    4. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by bytor4232 · · Score: 1

      Well, this DVD is why I bought a DVD player a few weeks ago.

      --
      -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
    5. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      First of all, he said 'home theater', not TV. Decent widescreen projection TV's start around $2000. Unless you want to listen to the 5.1 channel digital sound downmixed into 5-watt TV speakers that probably cost $1 to make, you still need a receiver with Dolby Digital decoding, five speakers (6 or 7 if you want to truly experience Surround EX movies like TPM), and a subwoofer.

      Second, I seriously doubt that, had the poster elected not to spend the $10k, it would have made any difference to starving people.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    6. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by Vudu+Child · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but the fact that this 'home theater' does the exact same thing my 19 inch TV does, only on a grander scale, makes the two comparable. It doesn't matter that one has several different components that must be purchased separately. A TV is the conveyance of the video and audio.

      However, you are right that this person would have likely spent the money on something else related to himself anyway. Our culture is very voyeuristic, as anyone who spends 10K on an entertainment center will tell you. Many of those that do go out and do things for entertainment, do not do things that usually help others (me included).

      --
      If you had my real name, you'd use an alias too.
    7. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot plant.

    8. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no such thing as a decent projection TV.

    9. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, just buy a plasma TV, they're under $10k now.

    10. Re:Worth to purchase a DVD player for by ryanwright · · Score: 2
      I've got some better points for why I enjoy my home theater much more than a "real" theater:

      I can sit back, put my legs up on the coffee table and relax without being bitched at.

      I can pause the movie if I have to take a leak.

      If some asshole leaves his cellphone on, I can kick his inconsiderate ass out of my house.

      The popcorn costs ten cents a bag and tastes better, too.

      Pizza & beer. Need I say more?

      No chance of some morons bringing their screaming 2 year old in to watch Sleepy Hollow.

      No chance of being hit with popcorn thrown by a group of obnoxious teenagers.

      I can watch almost any movie I want, any time I want, as many times as I want.

      I don't rent, however. I buy. The point of an HT isn't to save money, anyway. If I wanted to save money I never would have gotten into this hobby...

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  26. what will this do to the file sharing networks? by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1
    I'v seen a few comments (mostly here) that this is the film to gleam off of one of thoes evil file sharing networks. I wonder how many people will do this and if the networks can keep up with the demand? Could this grind the net down to a crawl like all thoes viruses like Nimda*? I doubt it, mostly because I don't know all that much about the way packets are shuttled around the globe.

    I guess my question is how many people will try to download it as soon as someone rips it, or will we all be law-abiding and get it from a store? Also, do you think this will slow down internet access allover the world and cause routers to spontaneously combust? Oh wait, I forgot that no one here would ever illegally download copyrighted material. ;)

    *Off topic, but when you herd of the Nimda, did anyone else immediately remember The Secret of Nimh? I love that movie!

  27. Sounds rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A crappy film with a bunch of extra crappiness thrown in - why should I want that?

  28. Another review by The+Grinner · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well, there's also another good review of the disk over at The Digital Bits. Been up there about a week or so now.

  29. Marketing Menace by phwiffo · · Score: 1
    That's the most biased review I've ever read. I don't think Lucas took that much time to
    1. Re-master the sound
    2. Make flashy menus
    3. Make a director's cut
    Digital techniques are supposed to reduce production time, not lengthen them.

    It's such a marketing decision. Classic supply and demand. Most starwars fans will have probably bought the DVD and the VHS by the 16th! What's that, $40-50 per fan for the same work?

    *cha-ching*

    --


    Trolls, it must be cool to be that bored.
  30. A much simpler review by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 4, Informative

    I mean this in all honesty:

    1. Phantom Menace was a poor to mediocre movie no matter what your point of view, unless you saw it when you were 7 without seeing the original movies. It does not deserve to be talked about any more that Waterworld does.

    2. DVD extras cannot change #1.

    1. Re:A much simpler review by goober · · Score: 1

      Lucas's big mistake with TPM was creating a more sophisticated plot than the original trilogy. A plot that apparently went completely over the heads of all the Lucas bashers out there.

      Hands up out there who realized that the good guys didn't win at the end of TPM.

    2. Re:A much simpler review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't apologise for it. TPM is a piece of shit.

    3. Re:A much simpler review by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      Lucas's big mistake with TPM was creating a more sophisticated plot than the original trilogy. A plot that apparently went completely over the heads of all the Lucas bashers out there.

      No, Lucas's big mistake with TPM was that he created a trite, predictable movie, which assumed that the viewer had the intelligence of a third grader.

    4. Re:A much simpler review by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Phantom Menace was a poor to mediocre movie no matter what your point of view, unless you saw it when you were 7 without seeing the original movies. It does not deserve to be talked about any more that Waterworld does.

      You, my friend, have far too weighty an opinion of Hollywood. The Phantom Menace was as good as most of the movies that have ever come out of hollywood. It might not be a timeless work of art--but that applies to the whole darn thing.

      TPM was Star Wars--the Star Wars of ewoks, time measured in parsecs, and hokey new age religion masquarading as fantasy blended with sci-fi. It's a fun space fantasy. If you go in waiting for anything but "fun star wars", you'll be disappointed.

      And I *liked* waterworld, god damn it!

    5. Re:A much simpler review by goober · · Score: 1

      No, Lucas's big mistake with TPM was that he created a trite, predictable movie, which assumed that the viewer had the intelligence of a third grader.

      Thank you for proving my point. Know-nothing blow-hards don't get it. btw, can you tell me the real reason why the Trade Federation invaded Naboo? Show me you have the intelligence greater than a third grader...

    6. Re:A much simpler review by elmegil · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Thank you for proving my point. Know-nothing blow-hards don't get it. btw, can you tell me the real reason why the Trade Federation invaded Naboo? Show me you have the intelligence greater than a third grader...

      In other words: "I am one of the elite few who understand the true genius inherent in the movie, and the rest of you who actually thought movies are to be enjoyed instead of analyzed are just morons. Nany nany boo boo!"

      Get real. TPM was trite and occasionally offensive. Most of the acting sucked (little Anniken in particular). A lot of effort was spent and the result should have been mind blowing on its face instead of requiring deep analysis and "understanding" to "get it".

      Actually though, this should have hardly been a surprise to anyone who went to see the re-issues of the original trilogy; it has not aged well, and the first movie which knocked everyone's socks off at the time in particularv is not much better than TPM except in the effects for the time department. Of course today those effects look dated too....

      If you want to live in your nostalgia land where Star Wars was the best thing your 11 year old eyes ever saw, feel free, but forgive the rest of us if we've grown up and placed higher expectations on our movies (even action movies need to surprise us).

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    7. Re:A much simpler review by goober · · Score: 1

      Actually though, this should have hardly been a surprise to anyone who went to see the re-issues of the original trilogy; it has not aged well, and the first movie which knocked everyone's socks off at the time in particularv is not much better than TPM except in the effects for the time department. Of course today those effects look dated too....

      Bravo! I agree completely! I'm not defending TPM as being great. I just don't think it sucks.

      Whatever...

    8. Re:A much simpler review by brsett · · Score: 1

      More or less, to get the cloning technology. And while the movie didn't suck imo, it was entirely predictable (with the exception of Darth Maul and Liam Neeson dying). Just thinking about that "are you an angel" part makes my skin crawl. Yecchh.

    9. Re:A much simpler review by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      No, Lucas's big mistake with TPM was that he created a trite, predictable movie, which assumed that the viewer had the intelligence of a third grader.

      Since third graders are his target market, I don't think it's a mistake. If some adults enjoy a movie for kids, I think Lucas views that as a bonus.
      --
      -Dave
    10. Re:A much simpler review by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Lucas's big mistake with TPM was creating a more sophisticated plot than the original trilogy. A plot that apparently went completely over the heads of all the Lucas bashers out there.

      But then he squandered about 3 hours of the movie on that interminable race, and all the pretty eye-candy under the ocean, and the third version of "Blowing Up the Big Spaceship with a Lucky Shot"(TM) while glossing over much of the really interesting political stuff. The Jedi Council meeting should have been shown in more detail. They decide not to train Anakin, which is illogical, and no justification is given for this bizarre decision.

      Granted, Lucas doesn't want to bore the kiddies, but let's face, if you are going to introduce political intrigue into your story, you shouldn't gloss over it so well. You can always cut back periodically to Jar-Jar getting his tongue scissored off or pod racers exploding or Darth Maul flossing his horns or something to keep the Ritalin set in their seats.

      In summary, if you are going to make a movie with a two-hour plot, don't waste two-thirds of the movie showing stuff that does little or nothing to advance that plot. One or the other has to go.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    11. Re:A much simpler review by johns713 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I liked WaterWorld! Granted it was not some great drama like Titanic or anything, but for a weekend outting it sure beat watching American Beauty. I would even go so far as to say it ranks right up there with Robinhood, Prince of Thieves.

      WaterWorld's problem was it did not live up to the hype. I mean come on, it was the largest movie ever at the time of it's release. And it had an star-studed cast.

    12. Re:A much simpler review by geomcbay · · Score: 2

      Cloning technology? There was no cloning technology on Naboo.

      They invaded, at the behest of Palpatine/Sideous to further the political chaos that was already beginning to occur in the Galactic Senate. Palpatine used this chaos to force a no-confidence vote of the senate leader and then took his place, setting himself up as the eventual Emperor.

      Anyway, my take on the whole suck/doesn't suck is that TPM *was* a Star Wars movie. It fit in neatly with all of the rest of the movies. In fact, I'd personally say it was a better movie than all the others except The Empire Strikes Back.

      The issue here is that if you look at any of the movies past or present you can find all sorts of faults, if you're looking at them as anything more than pure serial escapist fantasy. The problem most people have is they saw the originals when they were much younger when they could overlook such issues.

    13. Re:A much simpler review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      star-studded cast?!?!?? Jabronie...

    14. Re:A much simpler review by FeTrut · · Score: 1

      They decide not to train Anakin, which is illogical, and no justification is given for this bizarre decision.

      I thought it was because they knew he'd grow up to be a rat bastard...

    15. Re:A much simpler review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Buddy, that was obvious enough for even the little kids to gather. I once dated a girl who though Mission Impossible 1 was too complicated to follow, and I think that she would have gotten it.

      Geez, I thought you had some clever analysis that involved the number of spots on Darth Maul's face divided by Princess ??!@@'s hairstyle.

    16. Re:A much simpler review by dachshund · · Score: 1
      Since third graders are his target market

      See, that's what I don't get. If you want to get third graders in seats, make a Pokemon movie. It's a whole lot cheaper. On the other hand, if you've got a $100+ million budget and practically the every American 14-40 years old ready to see it five times, take advantage of it fer chrissake. Make a movie that appeals to the kiddies, but doesn't sicken the older types.

      Particularly if you've got two more sequels to sell... Third graders can only generate so much hype.

    17. Re:A much simpler review by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Yoda: The most powerful wielder of the Force ever he may potentially be, but train him we don't want to do. So loose let's just cut him and if an apprentice a Sith Lord takes him as in the future, deal with it we will in a sequel.

      Mace Windu: I bet they don't sell as as many stuffed me's as they do Jar-Jar.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    18. Re:A much simpler review by Bimble · · Score: 1

      The existence of subtleties in a movie does not make it a good movie - it just means you might gain some enjoyment from noticing them. Yes, the plotline involved more than just a planetary invasion and messiah-wannabe. Yes, there are plot points that aren't as obvious now, without later movies to point them out to people. But that doesn't change the fact that it's easy to dislike the overall movie. Heck, I loved parts of the "Dungeons and Dragons" movie, but thought the movie as a whole sucked eggs.

      For my part, while TPM had redeeming moments, the movie as a whole was a disappointment. Suspicions that Anakin's mother lied about Anakin's parentage to pique Qui-Gon's interest just don't make up for Anakin's terrible lines ("Yippee"? Who says "Yippee"?), Jar-Jar's constant distractions from the story, and absurdly juvenile plot devices like "ascension guns".

      I'm not about to roast Lucas for making a movie I didn't enjoy - he's made it clear I'm not in the target age group for TPM. But I'm not about to latch onto the movie's redeeming qualities in an effort to make its critics ignore its numerous flaws, either.

      --
      Naked.
    19. Re:A much simpler review by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

      The existence of subtleties in a movie does not make it a good movie - it just means you might gain some enjoyment from noticing them.

      And balancing out these subtleties were blatantly stupid parts, like the goofy attack robots that used war tactics from the 1700s--lining up in a big row so they could be mowed down--rather than being bent on actually killing things. Heck, humanoid robots weren't even needed.

    20. Re:A much simpler review by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


      > A lot of effort was spent and the result should have been mind blowing on its face instead of requiring deep analysis and "understanding" to "get it".

      This seems to be a standard claim from people who for some reason need to defend lame-o movies. "It was too deep for you lot to understand." I heard the same thing about the überpathetic Starship Troopers.

      Yeah, deep.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    21. Re:A much simpler review by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      My favorite part was controlling the attack robots from a single "mother ship" where the main reactor was conveniently placed right next to the front door. Obviously designed that way, of course, so that it could be blown up by a novice pilot just learning the controls of his ship.

    22. Re:A much simpler review by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, I forgot about my other favorite part, the test of his Jedi powers by a psychic test where every other hidden item was "ship."

    23. Re:A much simpler review by brsett · · Score: 1

      Trust me, there was cloning technology on naboo.

    24. Re:A much simpler review by lunadude · · Score: 1

      The Star Wars films are ment to be seen through the eyes of a child. The content and structure are that of the old serials (Flash Gordon, Spy Smasher, Batman). Yes there is some fluf, but one cannot take this too seriously.

      Get over it and have some fun!

    25. Re:A much simpler review by jedrek · · Score: 1

      I would never say that Startship Troopers was 'deep'. A movie with a bunch of 'heroes' running around shooting at bugs 'deep'? No way.

      On the other hand, I really enjoyed Starship Troopers, a fun, campy movie along the lines of Flash Gordon from the 50s. 'Fun': yes; 'Deep': never.

      jedrek

  31. And already the Eggs for these Discs are unleashed by suedehed · · Score: 0

    The Easter Eggs for the 2 Discs have already been exposed, I just hope they are, shall we say, legit. Check em out at DVD Easter Eggs.

  32. Starwars Episode1 DVD may be good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to check out a world class dvd, check out the Sleeping Beauty special edition dvd. THAT dvd truely is an amazing feat. It includes commentary put together from old recordings from Walt Disney himself and a plethora of other features that make Starwars features look standard.

  33. Alternate Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it have the alternate ending where Jar-Jar dies a horrible death ?

    1. Re:Alternate Ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does it have the alternate ending where Jar-Jar dies a horrible death ?


      Probably not, but let's petition Lucas to let David Cronenberg direct Episode 3© We would not be disappointed with Cronenberg's plans for JarJar©

  34. Sounds rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This disk sounds like a crappy movie with a bunch of crappy "features" (5.1 sound is a bonus now, is it?) thrown on. It sounds like utter crap.

    Interestingly, my other post stating this opinion has been deleted. Why are the admins here censoring this opinion? Is it because they're wetting their little pants over the turds that George is producing and don't like to be reminded how much of a ride they're being taken for?

  35. DVD of Christmas Special? by jonerik · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, yeah, yeah, this is all well and good. But when is the DVD of the Star Wars Christmas Special coming out?

    http://www.salon.com/ent/tv/feature/2000/12/05/s ta r_wars_tv/index.html

    1. Re:DVD of Christmas Special? by darth300z · · Score: 1

      ahhhh....good memories! TV didn't get any better than this! Not only do you have Bea Aurther singing a song as a bartender, but Princess Leia doing a song and dance with the wookies!!! Plus the first intro of Bobba Fett (as a cartoon no less)! Whoo Hoo! I remember sitting in front of the tv to watch this thing. I was the perfect age to enjoy the hell out of it! But no vcr back in 1978, curse the luck! Time to run over to ebay and buy a copy! :-)

      --
      By law, anyone who has been drinking is "sober" until he or she "cannot hold onto the ground." Actual lexington, KY law
    2. Re:DVD of Christmas Special? by gumbo · · Score: 1
      I burned a copy of the Christmas Special a week ago, and have only watched the intro and first scene (Chewbacca's family grunting at each other), but it's absolutely hilarious so far. The quality leaves much to be desired, since it's based on a 1978 videotape, but still, hilarious.

      George Lucas has been quoted as saying he'd destroy every copy of that show if he could, though. He didn't have much to do with the making of it, and he hated it. I don't think there's any chance of an official release.

      Gumbo

  36. Not Again by sessamoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess we're going to go through that whole long, drawn-out discussion of TPM:It Sucked vs. TPM:I Loved It again. The way I see it, TPM was no more hokey or badly acted than ANH. The casting was about the same, maybe better than ANH. The story is still classic space opera.

    I don't bother comparing the SW films to truly great moviemaking much. ANH is obviously a far inferior film when compared to the earlier 2001:A Space Odyssey. What's important about the films is the sea change they brought in the acceptance of SF in mainstream American culture, and the role it played in many of our childhoods.

    Bringing TPM do DVD in such a spectacular way can only be a good thing. If you don't like the movie, you shouldn't even be wasting your time reading this thread.

    --
    "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    1. Re:Not Again by Bwana · · Score: 1

      Bringing TPM do DVD in such a spectacular way can only be a good thing. If you don't like the movie, you shouldn't even be wasting your time reading this thread.

      I couldn't have said it better myself.

      --

      "Electric Relaxation" - ATCQ
      - Bwana
  37. No, that's wrong... by artemis67 · · Score: 2

    Lucas has publicly stated that he will release the original trilogy on DVD, but after Episode 3 comes out. He wants to release all 6 films in a special box set. If the review of Episode I is any indication, it should be worth the wait.

    Personally, I hope there is an option to watch the original trilogy before they mucked it up with that "Special Edition" crap....

  38. Where can you take 4 people to a movie for $25? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's $9.50 a pop here not counting snacks, beverages, & transportation. More along the lines of $30 for two.

    1. Re:Where can you take 4 people to a movie for $25? by llzackll · · Score: 1

      it's like $3.50 here during the day, at night it's $5 but for students it's still $3.50. Popcorn is like 5 bucks for the equivalent of a bag of microwave popcorn though.

  39. SW: The Phantom Plot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only there were a special director's cut that took out Jar-Jar, the stupid DNA test thingy and put in a better plot! It would sell like, hmm, I guess it IS all just about marketing. Lucas' artistic "vision" is becoming more myopic with every movie.

  40. No, you're wrong too... by jhoffoss · · Score: 2

    No, what he SHOULD do, is release the original trilogy on DVD soon, one at a time, then a boxed set with maybe a fourth disc of extra crap, then episode 2 on vhs, then on dvd, then epsisode 3 on vhs, then dvd, then a boxed set of all three 'episodes' with an extra feature disc, then all six with a ton of crap. Only then will Lucas have "Used the Force" (of marketing).

    I wish he'd just hurry up and release the original trilogy like everyone else though....

    --
    Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  41. BUT- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will the special features included on this DVD include never-before-seen backstage footage of Natalie Portman pouring hot grits down her pants?

    *grin*

  42. RCE is overrated by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
    Basically there are TWO places in a DVD player that contain zone information. There's a 8-bit bitmap in the MPEG stream that says which regions it's playable on (enforced by the player), and there's also an region number register in one of the GUI registers of the playback control software which can be read by the DVD's scripting (allowing enforcement by the DVD disc).

    The bitmap can easily be ignored, but it's hard to put six or eight integers simultaneously into a single register without resorting to quantum computing, which is still a few years off. So-called "region zero" players have the bitmap bypassed, but "region switchable" players let the user choose (and maybe automatically try based on the bitmap) which region number will be presented to the DVD's scripting code.

    Region switchable players also let you take advantage of discs which enable extra features (like subtitles in Asian languages) based on the player's region number.

    Anyhow, I don't expect to be getting this disc because I don't f'ing care about Episode I. I know it's heresy, but I never saw it in the theatres, and aside from Wierd Al Yankovic's summary of the movie, I have only the vaguest idea of what is contained within. I do know that I would hate Jar Jar, though.

    I also doubt I'll be getting the Episode 4-6 DVDs, because they'll likely only be available in the "Ministry of Information approved" edition. I've got the widescreen stereo release and the widescreen THX release on LD, without the "Han Solo didn't really shoot first" crap. I'll live with the disc change to watch the end of the movies on side 3, if that's what it takes to avoid the Politically Correct version.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:RCE is overrated by Malc · · Score: 1

      "and there's also an region number register in one of the GUI registers of the playback control software "

      GUI registers? Don't you mean GPRMs? I also believe that you're referring to "the navigator", which is separate from the GUI.

  43. Much better review at DVDFILE.com by Malc · · Score: 4, Informative

    This review is dreadful. Are the reviewers suffering from tunnel vision? Did they have their Lucas goggles on? Were they paid by Lucas? It's a bit of a brown-noser and the tone suggests to me that even if the quality of DVD had been really crap, they would still have written good things about it.

    I prefer the review at dvdfile.com. When they discuss the transfer to DVD, you can't but help feel that they know what they're talking about. Perhaps I also share the same opinion as the reviewer: this wasn't a great great film, but we all liked the *idea* of a Star Wars film. The review is here: http://www.dvdfile.com/software/review/dvd-video_4 /starwars_episode_i.html.

  44. Horge should have included... by datatrash · · Score: 1

    He should have tossed in Marlon Wayans jar jar impersonation from the deleted scenes Requium for A Dream dvd. Twas better than all of episode 1. The sight is completely wacked in any event.

    1. Re:Horge should have included... by datatrash · · Score: 1

      well so much for the link.

  45. No matter how you wrap it... by clickety6 · · Score: 1

    It doesn't matter if you put it in a beautiful carved sandalwood box, wrap it with expensive paper, tie it with fancy bows, and scent it with expensive perfume...


    ... a turd is still a turd.


    I'd rather have had a decent film, than an overbloated DVD.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:No matter how you wrap it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Lucas can go fuck himself. TPM was a steaming pile of dog shit.

  46. Should have pushed DVD out long ago. by timlyg · · Score: 0

    Now I'm not interested...seen the show too many times...

  47. Too bad I'm not six anymore by soccerfreak · · Score: 1

    It's too bad I'm not six anymore or I might have really enjoyed Star Wars Episode I. There's no way in hell I'm going to pay money to see the next Star Wars unless reviews say that it's not a film for young children like the last one. I'm not holding my breath in anticipation of Lucas' next effort. They say you can't go back home and this was most certainly the case with Star Wars. I had great hopes as the series moved on but this was one of the biggest letdowns of my my life. Sorry George, you may have done some great things in the past but don't you have enough money? How much more do you need you greedy bastard? Clearly EP I was made as a cash cow instead of with the intention of making a great film.

  48. dvd? passe. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had it on Laserdisc for almost a year now.
    No region encoding, No content controls.
    Same resolution you have on your DVD and in Dolby 5.1

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:dvd? passe. by Malc · · Score: 1

      Nice idea, but doesn't work for me as I can't pick-up rentals of LD's on the way home from work.

    2. Re:dvd? passe. by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      Errr... Laserdiscs have never supported as high-resolution images as DVD, especially when you take into account anamorphic enhancement.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:dvd? passe. by Icepick_ · · Score: 1

      Laserdisc?

      It's *analog* for god's sake. Gimme a break.

    4. Re:dvd? passe. by cwebster · · Score: 1

      really? and how exactly would one accomplish that. deeper pits? longer pits? On the disk its a pit or it isnt, 2 states, digital. I would assume it stays that way until after its read by the laser pickup.

      Also, a dvd doesnt stay digital long either. The video is analog-ized early on and sent to your viewing device. The audio does stay digital a little longer, at least till it gets to my receiver and is converted to 6 analog channels of audio.

    5. Re:dvd? passe. by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2

      The resolution of LaserDiscs is inferior not only when you consider the anamorphic enhancement, but also when you consider that the frames are interlaced.

      However, LaserDiscs can in some ways look much better than DVDs because the video is not compressed. No MPEG artifacts, etc. It's pretty much a "pick-your-poison" thing. Visually, I would say that a well-mastered DVD is superior to a well-mastered LaserDisc, but an average DVD is inferior to an average LaserDisc.

      BTW - I use both formats; I own about 4 times as many DVDs as I do LaserDiscs (~200 vs ~50), mainly because they are cheaper and easier to obtain. But when I do go back and watch my older LaserDiscs, the lack of compression artifacts is very apparent.

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    6. Re:dvd? passe. by mr3038 · · Score: 1
      a dvd doesnt stay digital long either. The video is analog-ized early on and sent to your viewing device.

      In fact you can send video fully digital up to display if you really want. Just use DVI or equal for output. Whether the pixels on screen are digital or analog is another question...

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
    7. Re:dvd? passe. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      BZZZZT! Wrong.

      Laserdisc - a LARGE 2 sided CD which are pits just like your CD and read by a laser (hence the name laserdisc) It is purely digital, uncompressed video.

      you are thinking of videodisc - 5 phonograph needles running on a PLASTIC disc to produce sub VHS video.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  49. In-depth review on IGN.com by Ringwraith · · Score: 1

    Check out IGN.com for a seriously in-depth review. (It's 8 pages long.) I'm not sure about the movie, but it sounds like the extras are great. I guess the DVD is actually a director's cut sort of thing, with footage that was cut from the theatrical release reinserted for the DVD release. Who knows? Maybe in 10 years Lucas will give us a cut worth watching. We can hope, anyway.

    --
    -- Hobbits suck!
  50. New Order vs. Phantom Menace by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1
    Let's see, New Order's new one comes out on the 16th and the Phantom Menace comes out the same day.

    New Order fan since 1982. Never disappointed (even by Republic).

    Star Wars fan since 1977. Disappointed numerous times except by TESB.


    The Winners are the Boys (and Girl) from Manchester


    Waaahay!

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  51. Get a clue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the possible exception of Episode V, each and every episode is bubblegum, and Episode V is marginally above that. They have always been bubblegum, and they will always be bubblegum. If you want a serious move, watch any movie by Akira Kurasawa (especially Ran!), and you'll soon realize how much bubblegum they all are, especially the original. You're off your rocker if you somehow think that Episode I somehow breaks some chain of spectacular moviemaking. This comes from someone who has seen each episode during their original theatrical releases, and has all the youthful memories of the original (which is still my favorite, I know for that reason).

    That said, they are *all* great fun, including Episode I. You just have to be in the right frame of mind.

    Chill out!!!

    1. Re:Get a clue! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they're bubblegum, but so what? Bubblegum is good sometimes.

      IV is mint-flavoured bubblegum
      V is peaches-and-cream-flavoured bubblegum
      VI is cola-flavoured bubblegum

      I is shit-flavoured bubblegum

  52. dude get over it by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0

    phantom menace sucked really really bad. watch the original dune movie for some real special effects. those models look 100x better than shitty cgi.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  53. In other words... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    Phantom Menace was a poor to mediocre movie no matter what your point of view...

    So no matter what I actually thought of it, it was a poor movie? And here I thought movies were subjective! Good thing your comment was moderated as +1 Insightful, or I might never have learned this valuable information.

    P.S. I thought it sucked ass, too.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  54. Alternate URL for movie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there another URL for the movie or a mirror site? I banned doubleclick.net a long time ago from my computer and the URL without the doubleclick.net part doesn't work either:
    http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;3350543;4317604;z? ht tp://aka1.starwarsgalaxies.station.sony.com/swg_fi nal.mov

    how to block web ads/bugs:
    http://www.ecst.csuchico.edu/%7Eatman/spam/adblo ck .shtml

  55. Agreed by Enygma42 · · Score: 0

    Those guys on theforce.net are a bunch of nuts. I liked the Star Wars movies (I even enjoyed Episode I despite its many pitfalls), but if there's one thing I hate about Star Wars it's those nuts whose lives revolve around it.
    Get a f*cking life!
    A Way Of Life

    --
    "hehe, website" - Homer Simpson
  56. Watch TPM with a different mindset this time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The movie wasn't horrible, it just got hyped up as being the greatest movie ever so much before the movie was actually released that people were very disappointed when it wasn't, and that Star Wars hadn't grown up with the fans. Lucas did say that he made the movie with kids in mind, didn't he? People shouldn't have expected it to be a life changing event, rather than a cheesy space opera with lots of spectacle.


    I went to see TPM, and I didn't expect it to have a very mature plot, developed characters, or that it would change the world. I went to see it because I wanted to see funny looking aliens, explosions, and cool lightsaber battles. I wanted to see what I saw when I saw ANH when I was seven. In my opinion, it delivered.


    That being said, the movie could have done without the Midichlorian (SP?) thing or Jar Jar Binks, and perhaps Lucas wen't a bit too far with the marketing. For this reason, I think it isn't as "pure" as ANH was. No matter, TPM is enjoyable for what it is.


    When most of us watch the old Star Wars movies, we watch it with the same mentality we did when we first saw it. Everyone who likes it reverts to the mental age of six or so when they watch it.
    Suddenly, incredibly corny characters like Han Solo and Boba Fett become the greatest characters ever. When we watch ANH, we don't question the movie... we know it is cool.


    I'm sure anyone who saw TPM when they were seven will be reminiscing about how cool it was when they are young adults.

  57. no 4:3 aspect ratio? by pomakis · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I couldn't help but notice that there's no option for a 4:3 aspect ratio in the specs for this DVD (using either pan-and-scan information or a separate side). The ability to encode multiple aspect ratios on a single DVD was one of the things that really excited me about DVD technology when it first came out. It allows a person to evolve his/her home entertainment system from a regular television to a widescreen system without making any sacrifices at any time. Unfortunately, very few DVDs are produced with this in mind. Most are widescreen only. So when I watch a movie on my 4:3 television I have to put up with a smaller letterboxed picture, causing me to almost have to squint at times to see see details in the movie. Sure, when I get a widescreen TV in the future this won't be a problem, but it frustrates me that I have to put up with this problem now, especially since DVD technology has a solution to it.

    Using the zoom feature of a DVD player to zoom in past the letterbox strips is not an option for me. It blindly cuts an equal amount off both the left and right sides, regardless of the scene.

    I'd like to know why very few DVDs include pan-and-scan information to allow proper viewing in a 4:3 aspact ratio. Is it that much more expensive to produce a DVD this way?

    1. Re:no 4:3 aspect ratio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why no 4:3? Well, for one there's no room left on the disc. This is also the same reason that DTS isn't included either.

      Additionally, many fans of DVD prefer not to have the film hacked to attain that 4:3 ratio. P&S can completely alter scenes and the panning that is added in is just annoying.

      Finally, directors (especially ones like Lucas who can have total control) refuse to alter their film by cutting it for P&S because they fell it alters and destroys their film.

      The only solution is to either have two versions of the film, or include both on the same disc (flipper).

      Watching a widescreen movie on a 4:3 television isn't really that bad. It may be distracting at first, but you get used to it and soon don't even notice the "black bars".

    2. Re:no 4:3 aspect ratio? by Brad+Wilson · · Score: 1
      I couldn't help but notice that there's no option for a 4:3 aspect ratio in the specs for this DVD (using either pan-and-scan information or a separate side). The ability to encode multiple aspect ratios on a single DVD was one of the things that really excited me about DVD technology when it first came out.
      I've never seen a DVD which can dynamically flip between widescreen and fullscreen, though I believe they exist. One problem there has to be one of labor: creating a pan & scan version of a film usually takes an incredibly patient and talented individual to do the new transfer (and don't even get me started on open matte crap). Does the DVD technology exist to make this process easier for the mastering of 4:3 from widescreen images? Would the obvious loss of resolution from scaling be a problem?

      I don't have an overly large television (32 inch) and you still couldn't pay me to watch pan & scan, personally.
    3. Re:no 4:3 aspect ratio? by pomakis · · Score: 1
      Additionally, many fans of DVD prefer not to have the film hacked to attain that 4:3 ratio. P&S can completely alter scenes and the panning that is added in is just annoying.

      But P&S technology offers the choice, so purists can select widescreen or letterbox, and people who want a corner-to-corner picture on their plain-jane TV can select P&S.

      Finally, directors (especially ones like Lucas who can have total control) refuse to alter their film by cutting it for P&S because they fell it alters and destroys their film.

      How do you think these movies are released to VHS tape or edited for television?

    4. Re:no 4:3 aspect ratio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ability to encode multiple aspect ratios on a single DVD was one of the things that really excited me about DVD technology

      So you think that using twice the space to store two versions of the same movie is exciting? DVD technology is a complete failure in this respect.

    5. Re:no 4:3 aspect ratio? by pomakis · · Score: 1
      To the best of my knowledge, DVD technology allows a movie to be encoded once, in a widescreen aspect ratio, with pan-and-scan information to allow a player to display a 4:3 aspect image by panning the widescreen image appropriately. All players can do this, because it's a non-optional part of the spec. However, very few movies are encoded in this way. Most movies that offer a 4:3 aspect ratio do so by encoding the movie twice (usually by using a double-sided disc). This indeed seems like an unneccessary waste, because the technology allows for a much more elegant solution. But I guess pan-and-scan encoding is expensive, so it's rarely done.

      I brought this up here initially because since George Lucas is being reported as going all out with the DVD release of Episode 1, I thought he'd have taken the extra bit of effort to encode pan-and-scan information onto the DVD.

  58. I was hoping... by Faust7 · · Score: 1

    ...that somewhere in the huge amount of extras there might be the real version of the movie, the one that didn't suck.

    Oh well.

  59. The *real* Director's Cut by MrEd · · Score: 1


    Well, having established that the Phantom Menace was a shitty movie targeted at easily-marketable 7-year-olds, I'd like to bring your attention to a release much worthier of your attention. The Phantom Edit, as it is called, is an underground 'remix' of this movie, a remix that attempts to bring a small level of respectability, plausibility, and intelligence to this poor film.



    No-one knows quite where to find a copy (seeing as it is a massive copyright violation), but I'm sure that Direct Connect, Morpheus, and WinMX users will be able to dig up a copy, somewhere.

    --

    Wah!

  60. Come on, People! You're missing the point here! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    With a DVD copy of Phantom Mucus, it will be possible to edit your own version of the film into something GOOD. And DIGITAL! No cheesy VHS or Quicktime bullshit.

    Plus with extra footage, and Dolby 5.1, it will be possible to do a BUNCH of cool edits. Like looping the crowd noise in order to get rid of the Howard Cosell "That's Gotta Hurt" English speaking alien announcer. And obliterating with finesse the final vestiges of 'Meta Chlorine' references.

    The 'Phantom Edit' was a VERY good start. I was amazed at just how huge a difference it made, turning a wretched piece of 2 out of 10 puke film into a 7 out of 10 Star Wars entry. I'll be using my copy of the Phantom Edit as my master cut-list simply because of the excellent work of the Phantom Editor.

    With that DVD in the hands of smart, tech savvy fans, it is very likely that Episode 1 will actually be rescued in a high-fidelity format.


    -Fantastic Lad

  61. Dolby Digital EX v. 6.1 by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2

    In a DTS 5.1 or Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtrack, there are 6 independent sountracks-- one for each speaker. The .1 bit refers to the fact that the Low Frequency Effects channel contains about one tenth as much information as a front or surround channel.

    In the old Dolby Surround system, the surround and center channels were extracted from the left and right stereo channels...

    For example, if the left and right channels contained the same audio at a particular time, the audio would be directed to the center channel. Don't ask me how the surround channel was extracted.

    Unfortunately, such a system is essentially unable to play sound from two speakers at once. Dolby Digital 5.1 improved on this system by seperating the surround channel into a left and right surround, and futher, by eliminating the extraction step-- six tracks are recorded instead of just the right and left. This allows the sountrack to use all of the speakers simultaneously.

    With Dolby 5.1 Surround EX, we're back to matrix surround. If the right and left surround channels contain the same audio, that bit is directed to the rear surround. 5.1 EX is 6 channels mixed so that a seventh can be extracted.

    6.1 would imply that the rear surround channel is recorded seperately. I believe that DTS has a discrete 6.1 mode.

    1. Re:Dolby Digital EX v. 6.1 by Malc · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification about DD EX. You are right, DTS does allow a discrete rear channel. As for Dolby Pro Logic Surround, I believe that I read something somewhere that the surround sound is inserted out-of phase with the left and right... it doesn't effect ordinary stereos, but a receiver with a Pro Logic decoder can extract it. I could be very wrong though ;) And of course, with Pro Logic, the surround sound is mono, even if you have two speakers. BTW, is Pro Logic the same as Dolby Surround 2.0 that we get on DVDs?

    2. Re:Dolby Digital EX v. 6.1 by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2
      BTW, is Pro Logic the same as Dolby Surround 2.0 that we get on DVDs?

      Essentially, yes. Here's a brief run down of the various technologies. Dolby Surround: a method of matricing four tracks into a stereo soundtrack. Often called 2.0, to highlight the fact that only two discrete channels of sound are recorded onto the film, DVD, laserdisc, etc. .

      These channels can be uncompressed (PCM, usually 1536 kbs), or compressed using the Dolby Digital compression system (varies, can be as high as 448 kbs, or as low as 192 kbs).

      Dolby Digital: a method of storing up to 5.1 channels (the .1 referring to a low bandwidth "Low Frequency Effects" channel) in a compressed format (maximum bitrate is 640 kbs, usually less than 448 kbs).

      Dolby Surround EX: a method of matricing 3 channels into the Left Surround and Right Surround channels, so that a Rear surround channel can be reproduced.

      Dolby Prologic: the most common method of extracting the extra channels from a Dolby Surround soundtrack. 4 channels are reproduced--Left, Right, Center and Surround. Typically the Rear channel is piped to two rear speakers.

      Dolby Prologic II: a newer decoding sytem with more advanced decoding algorithms-- supposedly it can mimic a left and right surround.

    3. Re:Dolby Digital EX v. 6.1 by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Pro Logic uses a matrix to combine the left and right channels to make a mix channel, from which the centre and rear channels are extracted.

      You can get an approximation of the rear channel by wiring a speaker between the (+) terminals of your hifi amp. Get two speakers, connect the positive tags to the positive tags on the amp, and connect the two negative tags on the speaker together. Don't connect them to the amp, or anything else.

      This is called a Hafler system. It works reasonably well, for something that costs nothing.

  62. How about SW 4-6? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    OK Lucus, when are you going to release the FIRST three (OK the MIDDLE three) Star Wars movies on DVD?

  63. dvd's are annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because of the regional code

  64. Jeeze, no Natalie Portman reference yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This *IS* Slashdot that I'm on, right? This *IS* about Star Wars episode 1, right? Natalie Portman *WAS* in this movie, right? Jeeze, has the AC who posted the Natalie Portman and hot grits posts died or something???

    Thomas Dz.

  65. Region 2 Languages? by osolemirnix · · Score: 1

    The most important aspect of a good DVD IMHO is the number of languages I get.
    On a region 2 DVD I want at least english, plus two others (german, french, spanish,..). Learning foreign languages was never so much fun. After all, that's what DVDs are about.

    Yet recently, there have been alle these DVDs where you suddenly cannot turn the subtitles off anymore, if you watch it in a foreign language. Really annoying crippleware (their argument being "licensing reasons"). What? As if I would buy it twice just to watch it in another language without subtitles?

    I'll wait and see how the region 2 version of Phantom Menace turns out in that aspect, before I make a judgement.

    --

    Idempotent operation: Like MS software, wether you run it once or often, that doesn't make it any better.
  66. It would have been a far better film... by way2muchsense · · Score: 1

    if George Lucas had called back Haley Joel Osment, who I just heard last night had auditioned for the part of Anakin Skywalker. This is the equivalent of the Red Sox selling Babe Ruth to the Yankees.

    Of course, then he probably would not have been able to act in The Sixth Sense, which came out the same year, and made him a really HUGE star.

    May the Curse of the Bambino II follow LucasFilm for the remainder of its existence. What is the nature of this curse? That no film in which LucasFilm was involved with in any way receive one single iota of attention from the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, no matter how Oscar-worthy it might be.

  67. karma whoring by johnnycal · · Score: 0

    There is a poll on century theaters to see the most anticipated upcomming scifi movie here.

    --
    yah, I brake it all.....
  68. Where's The Phantom Edit? by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2

    I want a copy of The Phantom Edit. Heck, I just want to see The Phantom Edit. Any hints?

    --
    If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    1. Re:Where's The Phantom Edit? by sulli · · Score: 1

      I bet someone writes a script to watch this on a PC...

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  69. Wow- talk about BLIND. by solios · · Score: 2

    I personally don't think it would have been possible for Jesus to give a better review of God.

    Reread the sentence, consider the originating website of the article (theforce.net) and you'll see what I mean exactly.

    I read about five paragraphs of it, and very nearly puked. I viewed source, expecting to see a suspected <drool> review </drool> tag set in there somewhere. No luck.

    This isn't a review- it's Lucasfilm Masturbigratification.

  70. Various vulgarities by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

    I like how they, for no apparent reason, tied the SWG teaser into a download from doubleclick.net. Will I be expected to sign up for the game through doubleclick also? As far as I'm concerned, this is a criminal organization that bribes and lobbies it's way out of legal trouble. Why not just have the mafia handle the subscriptions? Does anyone have a mirror for the movie?

  71. I'll give you a copy. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    If you have high speed, then email me at. . .

    Yobthra@yahoo.ca

    We can do the instant messenger thing. All you have to do is promise to make copies and distribute them to at least three other people. More than three is obviously better. It's important to the health of our culture to make sure that modern mythology stays in the hands of the people. Especially since Lucas can no longer be trusted.


    -Fantastic Lad --Greed is evil.

  72. love the fantasy football ad at the top by bwhalen · · Score: 1

    it seems a little demographic research is lacking at this site??

    --
    Where do you want to be, What are you doing to get there.
  73. not just for kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Episode is definitely NOT just for kids. I am tired of people saying things like 'ooh, it has no plot', or 'look at the simplistic story and embarrasing interactions and development' or 'this sucks, why was an entire MOVIE wasted on some POS planet that just 'happened' to be the first planet in Ep4" or "whats with all the blatantly cheap rip offs and redos of names, characters and alien phrases that totally makes the entire series into a cheaply written childrens series"

    Well, stop that bitching, and welcome yourself to the new millenium. No one needs plot, story or development. No one needs clever or witty interactions and story frames. Just get used to it and lobotomize yourself (then it is a GREAT MOVIE)

  74. Star Wars Galaxies CEO Speaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://lumthemad.net/story.php?story=2314
    2001-09-20 09:27:00

    Kelly Flock, CEO for the company releasing Star Wars Galaxies said, in a magazine quote

    "When asked if he takes into account consumer input Flock is dismissive, relying instead on the expertise of his staff. "No, we never talk to consumers - they just fuck us up. Someone asked for a copy of our market research which made us take the decision to do EverQuest. I said we hadn't done any market research. Had we done, the game would never have been made. We never focus on them. Gamers don't know what they want. We just want to know if they have a valid credit card"

    Would you buy a Star Wars Game from that man ?

    1. Re:Star Wars Galaxies CEO Speaks by Amanset · · Score: 1

      Yep, that would be this month's "Edge" magazine (from the UK). Shocked the hell out of me when I read it on the train today.

  75. Its the force.net by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    I'd like to a review from non-zealots as well.

  76. Dark by chegosaurus · · Score: 1

    Star Wars movies are never going to be dark. Blue Velvet is dark. Man Bites Dog is dark. Empire Strikes Back is a kids film with a cliffhanger instead of a happy ending.

  77. Why would you watch these in 4:3?!! by jibs · · Score: 1

    I would NEVER watch a film with an aspect ratio of 2.35:1 as pan-and-scan. You lose nearly half the film!!

  78. Anakin by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 1
    I don't think it would have been nearly as bad if they had a better actor to play Anakin (Haley Joel Osmand would have been perfect). I'm only 16 but I'm definatley not a newbie to Star Wars. I wasn't born till' after they came out but in the nature of a true geek I was running around my yard as a tie fighter at the age of 4. Hopefully Episode 2 will be aimed at an older audiance.



    --
    We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.