Slashdot Mirror


Happy Birthday! Email Is 30 Years Old

pgrote writes: "Happy Birthday Email! It turns 30 and Yahoo! News has an article here. Of course, they have the @ sign listed as a + sign. There is an interesting look at the history here. Two neat things about this: 1) The creator can't remember the first message, but he knows it was in ALL CAPS and 2) Can you imagine your life without email now?"

241 of 383 comments (clear)

  1. Email. by gmanske · · Score: 2, Funny
    I can't imagine life without email now, although I'd like to imagine it without spam.


    Happy birthday email!

  2. It may be 30 years....... by Beowulfto · · Score: 1

    but it sure feels more like 50-55.

    --
    There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes. -- Dr. Who
  3. Life without email by Hangtime · · Score: 5, Funny

    Before email I never knew there were so many women interested in showing me their tata's with such snappy come-ons as "We are all 18....and horny!" Who would ever have thought it! Me of all people would have women fawning over me like that and all thanks to email!

    HT

    1. Re:Life without email by grammar+nazi · · Score: 3, Funny
      And I never would have learned of the wonder benefits of Viagra and Printer Cartridges!!

      Now I can keep it "up" for as long the inkjet keeps printing pr0n... and that's a long time thanks to email!

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    2. Re:Life without email by rgmoore · · Score: 1

      But why do you have to study to get a diploma? Don't you know that you can get a degree for your life experience?

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    3. Re:Life without email by Quizme2000 · · Score: 1

      What about the chain letters, joke of the day, I love you messages? Pls forward this 100 times or have you will be cursed by the iHAVEnoSEXlife hex

      --
      "Get them before they get....
    4. Re:Life without email by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

      Come on!!!! You don't get any e-mails? That is hard to believe.

      What about the "Reduce your Debt" e-mails?

      or the "Hot Teens want you" e-mail?

      If you want some e-mail let me know I can forward some of my hotmail e-mails.

    5. Re:Life without email by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 1

      You can become an ordained minister in 5 mins. Try this out. I did it! I now walk around secretly marrying people. Now, if only I could become a sea captain online, I could also marry people at sea!

      --


      Do a google search before posting.
  4. Can I imagine my life without email? by Omerna · · Score: 2

    Yeah. And it's not pretty. I like having my spam condensed (mostly) into nice, easily deletable, chunks in my inbox. Telemarketers and junk mail are much harder to get rid of. Junk mail must be thrown away, and I'm a busy guy, ya know? Telemarketers have a knack for calling JUST in the middle of dinner. Email is perfect for consolidating the load. Thanks!

    Please note that was a (bad?) attempt at a joke. I don't need to modded down as troll.

    --


    No sig for you.
    1. Re:Can I imagine my life without email? by Mahonrimoriancumer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Umm, you know that telemarketers try to call during dinner?

      My brother used to be a telemarketer... He quit the day after he called me and asked if I wanted long distance, because I smacked him around when he got home.

      --
      So climate's changing. So what? It has always changed. The big news would be if it wasn't changing. - Dr. Philip Stone
    2. Re:Can I imagine my life without email? by erlenic · · Score: 1

      I've never been interrupted during dinner, but then again, all I have is a cell phone, so I have never gotten any telemarketer calls :)

  5. SPAM by ZenJabba1 · · Score: 1

    Who would have imagined 30 years ago, the amount of SPAM email that gets sent now, and if they did what would they have changed to stop it!

    --
    `find / -name "*your_base*" -exec chown us:us {} \;`
  6. First email by Defender2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet the subject was "MAKE MONEY FAST"

    --
    ...I'll procrastinate tomorrow...
    1. Re:First email by Quizme2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mine was..."TEST:Contact the administrator if you did not get this message".

      Technology will always be embraced by idiots and burden geniuses.

      --
      "Get them before they get....
    2. Re:First email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You know, I had always wondered if the very *FIRST* person (or at least the first few) got filthy rich doing this scam via email.

      I figured that one of the everlasting qualities about this scam is that there were so many people that actually believes/ed in it..

      Im figuring that people are still getting money _to this day_ because of theres peoples still seeing it for the first time..

    3. Re:First email by invenustus · · Score: 1
      You know, I had always wondered if the very *FIRST* person (or at least the first few) got filthy rich doing this scam via email.
      I doubt it. How many people who join that thing actually send the money to the people they're supposed to send to?
      --
      grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    4. Re:First email by chefren · · Score: 1

      I'd like to think it was "FIRST P0ST!"

    5. Re:First email by WMNelis · · Score: 1

      Regarding your sig. Not making a statement here, just a question. Would you consider the use/reading of /. some form of embracing technology?

      --

      Sig free since 2/6/2002
  7. all caps by InferiorFloater · · Score: 1, Redundant

    that's funny, I get lots of messages in ALL CAPS that I can't seem to recall. But I do know the gist was something like:

    HOT HOT HOT TEEN SLUTS WAITING FOR YOU

    --

    ---------
    Get back to me when my brain starts working.
  8. Random thoughts by solendril · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Ah, the beauty of email lies in its wonderful flexability and ease of use. No dead trees and no stamps. It's just as easy to send a 1,000 line message as a 5 line one. Our only job now is to make sure that it stays out of the evil hands of the United States Postal Service...

    1. Re:Random thoughts by andymoe · · Score: 1

      And US GOV...

  9. Historical progression by dghcasp · · Score: 1, Funny
    The article mentions that the first email message was possibly QWERTYUIOP

    Was the second one Make Money Fast! with QWERTYUIOP! ?

  10. life without e-mail... by Peyna · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wouldn't be much different, I'd just be on the phone alot more, and have alot more paper notes lying around. It's not like it is the only source of communication in the world. Try imagining life without electricity. I wouldn't put e-mail even in the top 100 of the "inventions" list, even if it is/isn't an invention...

    --
    What?
  11. Birthday... by frleong · · Score: 2

    Not even the creator remembered the exact day when this happened. It was only a vague "autumn of 1971". Can someone make a suggestion to Mr. Tomlinson to set a date so that people can celebrate more easily, when it turns 50?

    --
    ¦ ©® ±
    1. Re:Birthday... by wemmick · · Score: 1

      I doubt that we will be using text-based email twenty years from now. Nobody will notice or care when email turns 50.

      --
      ___
      Cognitive Overflow
      more than yo
    2. Re:Birthday... by WMNelis · · Score: 1

      I doubt we will be using COBOL code too :-)

      --

      Sig free since 2/6/2002
  12. One question... by Omerna · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Was it intended to be named:

    a)Email
    b)E Mail
    c)e-mail
    d)email

    I'd honestly like to know what the original intent was... and no, electronic mail doesn't count. (why? my post, my rules)

    --


    No sig for you.
    1. Re:One question... by solendril · · Score: 1

      The spelling I always remember from the early nineties was "e-mail." The lowercase "e" may have more to say about the hackers involved then the intended form. It's not like grammer matters too much to the people on IRC...

    2. Re:One question... by Skynet · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd just make it "email" and be done with it. It takes the least key strokes. ;-)

      --
      Execute? [Y/N] _
    3. Re:One question... by RudeDude · · Score: 1

      I've always preferred the look of "e-Mail" since it aesthetically looks pleasing (to me) and de-emphasizes the "E" without completely disassociating it from 'mail'. The article on pretext.com uses all lower case 'e-mail'. So does the body of the Yahoo article... but the Yahoo article title uses "E-Mail" as if following standard title capitalization rules. It doesn't even occur to me that there would be any technical reasons to choose one over another, I'm sure it's purely style.

      --
      RudeDude
      Perl/Linux/PHP hacker
    4. Re:One question... by timmyd · · Score: 1

      Here is a quote from Donald Knuth's homepage:

      A note on email versus e-mail

      Newly coined nonce words of English are often spelled with a hyphen, but the hyphen disappears when the words become widely used. For example, people used to write ``non-zero'' and ``soft-ware'' instead of ``nonzero'' and ``software''; the same trend has occurred for hundreds of other words. Thus it's high time for everybody to stop using the archaic spelling ``e-mail''. Think of how many keystrokes you will save in your lifetime if you stop now! The form ``email'' has been well established in England for several years, so I am amazed to see Americans being overly conservative in this regard. (Of course, ``email'' has been a familiar word in France, Germany, and the Netherlands much longer than in England --- but for an entirely different reason.)

    5. Re:One question... by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 1

      (Of course, ``email'' has been a familiar word in France, Germany, and the Netherlands much longer than in England --- but for an entirely different reason.)

      What's the reason?

    6. Re:One question... by antdude · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      From what I understand, it doesn't matter as long as you keep the word consistent. For example, Web vs. web. If you are going to use Web (capital W), then keep using that on the whole Web site. :)

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    7. Re:One question... by whovian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Email means enamel auf deutsch.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    8. Re:One question... by gleam · · Score: 2

      I have a relative who will go nameless who insisted on typing it "eMail."

      Always threw me off.

      me, I do email.

      --
      this .sig is not a .sig.
    9. Re:One question... by ath0mic · · Score: 1

      Actually /. ran a story on this a while back
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?
      sid=00/10/23/12 55205

      inspired from this wired article
      http://www.wired.com/news/culture/
      0,1284,39450,0 0.html

    10. Re:One question... by Nightpaw · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are on crack. You're entitled to your opinion, but man, that's the least aesthetically pleasing option for me.

    11. Re:One question... by htmlboy · · Score: 2

      Was it intended to be named:

      a)Email
      b)E Mail
      c)e-mail
      d)email


      i've no idea what they originally called it, but the difference in those choices is just a natural progression of our language. when a word like that is introduced to our culture, it's originally separated by a space, then the space becomes a hyphen, then the separation disappears altogether. so in common use, it went:

      e mail -> e-mail -> email

      i suppose capitalization goes away as time goes by, too, but that wasn't covered in my linguistics elective.

      chris

    12. Re:One question... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it
      E-MAIL
      or
      EMAIL
      because the computers used didn't have lower case letters?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted and ignored otherwise.
    13. Re:One question... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Email is a sort of porcellan coating done on metal. Don't know the english word.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted and ignored otherwise.
    14. Re:One question... by Bishop · · Score: 2

      I believe the english word is "enamel."

    15. Re:One question... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      It's best to just call it 'mail' if there's no ambiguity. And 'an email' is called a 'message'.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    16. Re:One question... by basic70 · · Score: 1

      We need a Wav file.

      "Hi, My name is Mr. Tomlinson, and I pronounce email, email.".

      /Basic

    17. Re:One question... by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      well, we call them "Lotus Notes" of course.

      Our company was pretty slow in picking up on email outside the company. We got Notes not long after our 3270 consoles were replaced with PC's... oh about 92-93 I would say.

      We were sending internal correspondence via notes for at least a couple years before they discovered interent email (one customer was completely baffled by the salesman's blank stare when asked for his email).

      Funny thing is once we started exchanging email with our clients on a regular basis, most people still referred to them as 'Lotus Notes'.

      "Hi, Joe... this is Sam from xyzcompany."

      "Oh, hi... howya doin?"

      "Good, good... say, you get that Lotus Note I sent you?"

      "Wha???"

    18. Re:One question... by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 1

      i suppose capitalization goes away as time goes by, too, but that wasn't covered in my linguistics elective.

      Kind of like "Internet" -> "internet". MS Word (ugh) always puts that little red underline if I don't capilalize.

    19. Re:One question... by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Back in the early days it was called e-mail. Somewhere around 1990 it started turning into email.

      I remember this because flamewars would erupt over the proper spelling of email (or e-mail). No doubt future slashdotters honing their skills in anticipation of the web.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    20. Re:One question... by thvv · · Score: 1

      When I wrote it in 1965 we called it MAIL.
      This "e" business always sounded silly to me.

  13. First EMail account? by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mine was on the Pig & Whistle BBS in Montreal (684-0282, I think it was), back in 1987.

    Running on an Atari 800xl, maxed out with 256k RAM plus four full floppies (180K each), all hooked to the net with a blazing fast 1200 baud modem. I was limited to my puny little 300 baud.

    ...And then came Fido...

    --

    ---

    Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

    1. Re:First EMail account? by Tim+Doran · · Score: 2

      heh... my first email account was assigned as part of my job with Forestry Canada in S. Ste Marie, ON (1989). I had my own (graphics-capable!) terminal on the VAX and everything.

      Better yet - a buddy in Comp. Sci. back at campus told me about a Faculty of Science unix box through which I could gain access to the magical wonderland of Usenet. He coached me on how to ask for an account ("I'd like to learn Unix, please") and what NOT to say ("I'd like to hog bandwidth in my attempt to read everything ever posted to Usenet").

      Sure 'nuff, the admin gave me a shell account and told me how to get a dialup account. Ahh, the world was at my fingertips. And my grades were somewhere around my shoes ;)

    2. Re:First EMail account? by singularity · · Score: 2

      I was not as early. People were amazed at my 2400 baud modem, though.

      It was 1992, and I was connected through a free FidoNet-connected BBS in Louisville, KY (called TSCOPE for anyone from the area). We could get Internet email accounts and a very limited Usenet feed.

      The SysOp of TSCOPE actually became a friend of mine (local BBS gatherings - those were great fun). The BBS was run on two phone lines connected to a 286.

      I was running my 2400 baud modem off of an Apple //gs with 1meg RAM, no hard drive, running at 2.8 mHz.

      I remember reading about the Waco comings and going online. Significantly different coverage (for better or worse) than the Trade Center coverage.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    3. Re:First EMail account? by ekrout · · Score: 2

      256K of RAM? 640K is all you'll ever need, so you're pretty well-off! ;-)

      --

      If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    4. Re: First Email account? by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm young...I still remember the day we trooped down to the computer lab to learn how to get on the internet...November 1996...the computers were running Windows 3.11 with Netscape...I skipped class the rest of the day, content to surf...saw an ad for "Free Email"...joined Hotmail that very day...I checked and found the lab opened at 0630...the next day I was in and had found Geocities...learned some HTML and said "Hello, world"...haven't looked back. Of course, I did wind up failing out of school because I spent a solid 15 hours per day in the computer lab for the next month, but hot damn, I was having fun.
      I'm just now getting back into school...but I've learned my lesson, Electrical Engineering is not for me...Computer Science is where I'm headed.
      Thanks for stirring up old memories...old to me, anyway.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    5. Re:First EMail account? by SaDan · · Score: 1

      Wow... I can't even remember the BBSs where I had email accounts in the late eighties and early nineties. I know one was in Indianpolis, IN, one was in Cincinnati, OH, and the other was in Chicago, IL. Good BBSs were all long distance from me, so I didn't use the email features very much, just for local chat with other users while we were offline. 2400 baud and long distance sucked.

      Got to Purdue University in '95, and discovered the joy of TCP/IP via a 19.2Kb/s DOV unit and SLiRP on my first Unix account. Seemed like a small step at the time, but it definately led to where I am right now.

      Yes, brings back memories. Happy birthday, email!

    6. Re:First EMail account? by manon · · Score: 1

      It sure brings back memories. I think those were the romantic days...
      No cable modem, no spam, no people asking stupid computer question all the time (live spammer those are, a pest).
      And far away from people having trouble configuring stuff like outlook...
      Damn I miss those times.

      --
      42 + 1 = 42
    7. Re:First EMail account? by peter303 · · Score: 2

      1974 at MITAI.
      However, my 1976 account STILL WORKS,
      although you have to attach a domain to it.

    8. Re:First EMail account? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      1974 at MITAI.

      You got me beat (first time on Slashdot, BTW - congrats... I was never the first on usenet "remember when..." threads). My first mail account was on some big system in 1979. My first BBS was in 1981... an Apple ][+ with four disk drives giving a total storage of 400K. One was the BBS software and DOS, one was mail and messages, and two were seperate file areas.

      Anybody else remember "bang paths"? (although I never called them that until they were obsolete... they were just "how you get to the server").

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  14. new? old? by RudeDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And yet I sitll hear people talk about this as a "new" technology. Human perception is such a tricky thing. I'm personally glad it has become mainstream. Even with the curse of SPAM it still has a world of uses that are worth while. Now we just have to hope the Internet as a whole isn't just a 'fad'. ;)

    --
    RudeDude
    Perl/Linux/PHP hacker
  15. ahh what would life be like.. by josepha48 · · Score: 2, Funny
    if that little baby was never born???

    We'd never know that "I Love You" ;-)

    We'd probably have a new 'Outlook'!

    Ahh.. I think I could do without that crap anyway.....

    Just think in all that time the RFC are still not implemented with any security in mind.

    HELO
    FROM: bill@microsoft.com
    RCPT TO:you@friend.com
    DATA
    blah blah blah....
    .
    QUIT

    NOOP

    NOOP

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

    1. Re:ahh what would life be like.. by AtrN · · Score: 1

      Remember the "S" in SMTP is for "simple".

    2. Re:ahh what would life be like.. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I thought for a long time that the S in "SQL" also stands for simple, but I digress.

      The "simple" is most helpful for testing. It makes sending email via telnet possible and "easy". And it makes the coding of mailers easy as no binary output is needed, just plain text.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted and ignored otherwise.
  16. E-mail helps people find each other. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 4, Interesting


    They say that the internet takes people away from real interaction, but I have found it to be the opposite.

    For example, I met a Brazilian woman in a chat room, and, after months of sending hundreds of e-mail messages and then talking on the telephone, I went to Brazil and lived with her family while she taught me Portuguese.

    Without e-mail, I would have had much less connection with Brazilians.

    What should be the Response to Violence?

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
    1. Re:E-mail helps people find each other. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Did ya fuck her?

    2. Re:E-mail helps people find each other. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Of course he did numbnuts! Brazillian women are notoriously easy. When I went to Brazil for 2 weeks this past May, I got laid on a nightly basis. Rock on!

    3. Re:E-mail helps people find each other. by kusma · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't it extermely funny that this gets moderated as "informative"?

    4. Re:E-mail helps people find each other. by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      I'm very glad to be in on this secret. Now I know where my next vacation will be. ;-)

  17. Huh? by Beowulfto · · Score: 1
    And, the top-of-the-line modem connection at the time operated at a snail-like 300 baud, roughly one-twentieth of the speed of today's standard 56.6 kbps modem.

    What percentage of dial-up accounts hit 56.6? In my experience the phone lines will rarely support anything over 33.6 or even as low as 28.8. Just because the modem is rated for 56.6 doesn't mean it is practicly standard.

    --
    There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes. -- Dr. Who
    1. Re:Huh? by Obsequious · · Score: 1

      Personally, I just like how 300 baud (which is 300 bps) is 1/20 of 56,600 bps. I had no idea that 6,000 = 56,600. It's a good thing we have journalists to do such extensive research and fact-checking; just think of how long the mathematicians have been overlooking that amazing equality!

      Or am I missing something here? :P

    2. Re:Huh? by Sly+Mongoose · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      What percentage of dial-up accounts hit 56.6? In my experience the phone lines will rarely support anything over 33.6 or even as low as 28.8. Just because the modem is rated for 56.6 doesn't mean it is practicly standard.
      First, I think modern modems are rated at 57.6 not 56.6!

      Second, I understand there is some legal limit around 53 but I've never hit that mark. I get 50.666 almost every time with 49.333 very occasionally. Everyone else I know also hits 50.666 fairly consistantly, with an occasional 49.333 like myself.
    3. Re:Huh? by Sly+Mongoose · · Score: 2
      Ha! Last time I checked, I had 1,500.00k (or 1.5 MEGAbITS!)
      Pity you don't have a brain to go with it!
    4. Re:Huh? by dbucher · · Score: 1

      There is no such *legal* limitation, at least not in Europe, and in Europe modems are not faster !

      --
      The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance.
  18. Email rocks! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I personally believe email is the killer app of the Internet. Sure, there's other stuff, like news, chat and, recently, the web, but I think email is what made it all happen. If there never was email, I think the whole Internet thing wouldn't have taken off at all. Yeah, people give credit for the recent take off to the world wide web, but I'm talking about the Internet getting to the stage it was in when the web was invented. Oh well... All I'm saying is, email rocks!

    1. Re:Email rocks! by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 2

      I think the new killer app has become Instant Messagine (ala yahoo, msn, aol, icq, etc.) I know that email has it's history but I know I use IM much more than email. Plus I get much less spam through it, none! ICQ has it's spam problems and AOL has it's own, but it pales in comparison. I can't be the only one who sees it this way. Large number theory is behind me on this one. Maybe I just like instant gratification =)

      --
      WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    2. Re:Email rocks! by Howie · · Score: 2

      IMs are at least 10 years old already. CMU had Zephyrgrams when I was at college, and I think that had been around a little while then.

      IM as implemented by ICQ or Yahoo only really serves to have strangers interrupt me with incoherent junk rather than merely fill my mailbox with it. If only IM clients has as much brains as some mail clients do.

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
    3. Re:Email rocks! by superdk · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. Email is really bigger than IM is right now and will remain that way for a while.

      Believe me, when a business internet customer's email goes down all hell breaks loose, they never scream about their IM not working.

      --


      Silly slashdot, sigs are for kids!
    4. Re:Email rocks! by Phexro · · Score: 2

      "IMs are at least 10 years old already."

      a bit older than that, i'd imagine. from write(1):

      HISTORY
      A write command appeared in Version 1 AT&T UNIX.

    5. Re:Email rocks! by Howie · · Score: 2

      I thought about that as I pressed submit :)

      I meant GUI IMs when I said 10 years, or at least ones that don't screw up your terminal window while you are trying to work. write(1) and talk(1) don't play friendly with fullscreen apps, and annoyingly don't work that well with multiple logins (e.g. screen or xterms), either.

      I miss talk, and the days when a user community was around the machine - personal unix has killed a lot of that, leaving things like IMs and slashdot to fill the void.

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
  19. My moment of silence to commemorate the event.... by IcebergSlim · · Score: 1



    ATTENTION!!! $100 CLUB/LGS CASH CLUB MEMBERS and anyone who wants more money... VERY IMPORTANT INFO TO HELP YOU MAKE MORE MONEY GUARANTEED IS IN THIS LETTER!

    Hello
    Welcome to this powerful group and thank you for your efforts to add to this team! My name is Ben and just so you know this is not SPAM I am the one who put this group together. Together we stand to make alot of money in this and any future companies this group merges into. However We will only be successful if we continue to grow very rapidly! Currently our group posesses 8-10 "Heavy Hitters" these people NEED YOUR HELP!!! There are many ways to HELP OUT and put alot of CASH IN YOUR POCKET at the same time! As any NETWORKER who actually makes money could tell you HIGH QUALITY LEADS and TARGETED ADVERTISING are the 2 most important things! For those of you who know me you can skip a lin................

  20. what about after the @ sign? by paranoidia · · Score: 1

    Of course e-mail is great, but at first it was used to comunicate with a few people across the same network. What about the development of the DNS structure? The ability to have domain names and usernames for e-mail is a lot different from the original design of it.

    1. Re:what about after the @ sign? by Matthew+Luckie · · Score: 2, Informative
      Of course e-mail is great, but at first it was used to comunicate with a few people across the same network. What about the development of the DNS structure? The ability to have domain names and usernames for e-mail is a lot different from the original design of it.
      This all happened after Al Gore invented the Internet.
  21. The 100th monkey theory by Water+Paradox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Started using e-mail in 1988, when it was 'bout half as old. I remember trying to explain to people what e-mail was. It was one of the great lessons of my life, because people looked at you dumbly, no matter how eloquently or simply you described the process.

    Then one day, it "caught on." It had reached the media, and enough people knew how it worked that suddenly everyone seemed to know how it worked. As a geek, I didn't spend half an hour explaining e-mail anymore. I got right down to the nuts and bolts of showing people how to use it.

    We used BITNET, back then...

    -Jared

    --
    information is immaterial
    1. Re:The 100th monkey theory by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      Ahh yes.. BITNet. Back in the days when sending a full Byte through ByteNet could literally cost you an arm and a leg (aging process isn't nice on the body).

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:The 100th monkey theory by K8Fan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hell, back in the late 80s and early 90s they used to have the "@-Party" at the World Science Fiction Convention. All you needed was an e-mail address to get in. Even at this convocation of self-selected, very geeky people filling several hotels, all the "internet people" were able to party in one hotel suite. I remember meeting Cliff Stoll (before he went all curmugonly) and ESR was hawking his fresh-off-the-press "The New Hacker's Dictionary".

      Someone even put instructions on how to crash the @-Party on one of the (physical) bulletin boards. They had printed things like "yourname@domain.com" and people came up to the door claiming that their e-mail address was yourname@domain.com. They didn't get in.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  22. i recall... by flynt · · Score: 1

    i read in a book once, and perhaps it was made up, that the first message was something about forgetting a razor blade or shaver or toothbrush somewhere, and that's why email was made up? any truth to this?

  23. First message? by Macrobat · · Score: 2, Funny
    Well, duh. There's only one thing the first message could have been...


    "FIRST POST!"

    --
    "Hardly used" will not fetch you a better price for your brain.
    1. Re:First message? by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

      No, it was "Imagine a beowulf cluster of mail servers!"

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  24. the new yardstick by digitalmuse · · Score: 5, Informative

    hmmm, e-mail is older than I am (26yrs). and I measure myself through the things I've seen. I remember Ronald Regan as a very young child. I recall my parent's last throes of back-to-the-land/cold-war self-sufficency. I was astounded as the first Space Shuttle launch took us around the earth and flew us back home on wings. I was glued to the TVs when the Challenger exploded. I was there when faxes were pasted hourly on the walls of Boston's china-town as Tienamen square unfolded.
    I lost friends in an act of terrorism that the world had never seen before, or even believed possible outside of cheap paperback fiction.
    I have done all these things at a distance, I have made friends and effected change on continents that I may never visit.
    I have dipped my toes in the greater waters of mankind.
    All this in less than 30 years.

    How will my children look back when they are my age?
    Will they remember a world before the arrival of the meta-verse that allows them to interact around the world, regardless of language, race, time, or class?
    Will they look back with sepia-toned memories of the good-old days before corporate structures replaced government?
    Might they think of us with scorn, as those who poisoned the earth and water that they inherited?
    Or will they think of us as the generation that first tasted this fruit of true communication, and were alternately torn and brought together by it.
    pioneers in a digital age where the hot metal was still fluid and a maleable medium, filling gaps and voids in the mold of society.
    what will someone say about us in 30 years.
    what do we want to leave as our legacy for our children,
    food for thought.

    --
    "If I wanted your input on my pet project, I'd stick my hand up your ass and use you like a sock-puppet." - Muse
    1. Re:the new yardstick by NonSequor · · Score: 4, Funny

      How can you be 26 and remember Ronald Reagan as a very young child?

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    2. Re:the new yardstick by NonSequor · · Score: 2

      Please don't make me explain the joke because that would ruin it.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    3. Re:the new yardstick by cvande · · Score: 1

      Well said.....

      As long as we can remember these things with a sense of awe...all is not lost.

    4. Re:the new yardstick by Vaystrem · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm curious to know how you
      1) "remember Ronald Regan as a very young child" considering that
      2)"On February 6, 1911, Ronald Wilson Reagan was born to Nelle and John Reagan in Tampico, Illinois. "
      when you said
      3) "I am (26yrs)."
      and
      4) "All this in less than 30 years."

    5. Re:the new yardstick by discovercomics · · Score: 1

      If He was born in 1975 he would be 26 this year.
      Reagan was elected in 1980 and served two terms through early 1989
      So our very astute poster was around 5 when Reagan entered office and around 13 when he left office

      So of course he could remember Reagan

    6. Re:the new yardstick by schulzdogg · · Score: 1
      Thank god someone else knows that Tom Clancy is a talentless hack



      Amen Brother.



      I read the bear and the dragon to spite myself, it was in a place beyond terrible where high school wannabe authors live.

    7. Re:the new yardstick by PCM2 · · Score: 2

      I think it was a typo; he meant "a very OLD child."

      BA-DA-BING!

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    8. Re:the new yardstick by CokeBear · · Score: 2

      Speaking of Tom Clancy... (yes, I know I'm straying off-topic, but please wait until someone replies before you mod me down) I recall a book that I read many years ago, in which terrorists released some biological agent at various sites around the USA, including a MacWorld Expo. The effect wasn't felt for some time... after people had travelled on planes back home from the conference (and the other places where the stuff was unleashed). The effect was that the disease broke out all over the USA simultaneously, and the source could not initially be determined. I can't for the life of me remember the title, and its been bugging me for weeks. Anyone know what it was?

      --
      Reality has a liberal bias
    9. Re:the new yardstick by jslag · · Score: 1
      How can you be 26 and remember Ronald Reagan as a very young child?


      I'm of similar vintage, and remember quite clearly how pissed off my parents were at this 'president' person...

  25. Thanks, Ray by Bastian · · Score: 1

    Just think about how much more healthy the online pr0n industry is, thanks to Ray Tomlinson.

  26. It is a double edged sword by El_Nofx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At my moms work, if their email servers go down, the whole company shuts down, all 10,000 people.
    People have become too depenedent on email in some cases. They can't do their job without it.
    Every time a new virus comes out the spreads through email they have to shut down the whole system because all the employees are too stupid and still don't know better then to open the attachments.
    But email has improved their productivity by at least 25% and the cost is worth it to them.
    The thing I hate most about email is that it is so impersonal. People fire people though emails.
    They applogize to them thourgh them, ask people out on dates. It gives the anti-social a way to not interact. I hate that

    --
    It's not the OS it's the user that sucks. If it's user friendly, you get stupider people. - clinko
    1. Re:It is a double edged sword by TaoJones · · Score: 1
      El_Nofx wrote:
      At my moms work, if their email servers go down, the whole company shuts down, all 10,000 people.

      ...sounds like email is "mission critical" to them. So make sure it works.

      People have become too depenedent on email in some cases. They can't do their job without it.


      So what? People have become way too dependant on elecrticity too, and we won't even mention fire... Just keep the PHBs happy and it's all good.
      Every time a new virus comes out the spreads through email they have to shut down the whole system because all the employees are too stupid and still don't know better then to open the attachments.


      Sounds like a bad sysadmin to me... why give users the chance to blow their foot off?

      But email has improved their productivity by at least 25% and the cost is worth it to them.


      Damn, so who is this company? A 25% increase in productivity just because Joe Blow has email? Now, if it made my penis bigger or increased my chances of meeting "Naughty Teen Coeds" I'd believe you ;)

      The thing I hate most about email is that it is so impersonal. People fire people though emails.
      They applogize to them thourgh them, ask people out on dates.

      Yup, they sure do.

      It gives the anti-social a way to not interact. I hate that


      *shrug* so how exactly is it "anti-social"? There are people that I "talk to" on a regular basis that the only proof I have that they exist is via email/im/whatever... Maybe I'm way off base as to who these people *are* that I'm dealing with (possibility), but I still don't get "anti-social"...

      Now it's getting late here, but my anti-social North American ass is off to play StarCraft with some dude from Australia...

      TaoJones


      "Every 24 hours seven people step on mines in Afghanistan. Be careful not to be one of them today and tomorrow." iranian.com

      --
      "Fear is the rootkit of democracy.." Blarkon
  27. Me too! by Grue · · Score: 1

    Who can forget the countless times their favorite mailing list has been flooded with Me too! messages.

    It's great how their are hierarchies of recognition and respect depending on what your e-mail addy is.

    Me too!

    Josh

    1. Re:Me too! by Grue · · Score: 1

      doh, there are

  28. Cool, I'll send a card by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

    Cool... I'm off to bluemountain to send myself a card.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  29. and tomorrow.. by Capt.+Beyond · · Score: 1

    is the 30th 'birthday' of the e-mail virus!!

    :)

    --
    -- "Perceptions create reality. By changing your perceptions you change your reality."
  30. I send you this file in order to have your advice by mini+me · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Happy Birthday.gif.exe

  31. Re:Let me get this straight... by rossz · · Score: 1

    Yeah, we should shut down our entire lives completely and ignore everything else in the world except for this one horrible event?

    B.S. It's time to get on with your life. A great tragedy occurred, but at some point you have to pick yourself up and live again. I suggest you seek therapy. You might be suffering from post-tramatic syndrome.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  32. Re:Let me get this straight... by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

    I hope for your sake this is a troll. This site is primarily "news for nerds. stuff that matters" (in theory). This is not a general news site. /. was considerate enough to abandon normal operations to provide the public with a service when it was greatly needed. That service is no longer needed. News sites are operating just fine so people can go there to get their info about WTC. Like you said, it's been almost 3 weeks. Believe it or not, life goes on. The world cannot and must not stop forever because of any tragedy no matter the magnitude. The WTC attack was a terrible thing. What would continuing coverage on a totally unrelated website accomplish? It would be unneccesary repetition. Maybe YOU need to get some priorites. I intend to live while I still have my health.

  33. Hi! How are you? by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 4, Funny

    I send you this file in order to have your advice
    See you later! Thanks

    Attachment #1 -- me&judy.jpg.vbs

    1. Re:Hi! How are you? by klykken · · Score: 1

      Then, dear Sir, could I suggest adding a procmail routine to take care of that?

      --
      Looks like a fish, drives like a fish, steers like a cow.
  34. E-mail! by hendridm · · Score: 1

    Websters says that it's e-mail. Oxford English Dictionary spells it both ways (e-mail and email).

    I personally like 'e-mail', since phonetically 'email' could be pronounced EH-mail.

    1. Re:E-mail! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      you clearly don't understand basic English rules. "email" should be pronounced "eemail", the vowel after the m hardens the e. Same reason I always read Linux as "Line-ucks" even though I know it's roots are not English at all.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  35. Forget the diploma by mike_the_kid · · Score: 1

    Look, I do not tell everyone about this, but I have an opportunity for you where you can make up to $7000 per week from your own home.
    Everyone knows that the internet is synonymous with $$$, but until now, only a few people knew how to get the $$$.
    I was looking at your resume, and it looks pretty good! Now, with times being as tough as they are, I want to let you know about a little tool at resume_goat.cx. This classy, non-trapping web site will submit your resume to all sorts of high tech employers out there just looking for people to recruit.
    So you ask, how can this translate to $$$, well its this new technology called marketing! Sign up now by sending in $29.95 to yours truly, and I will let you in on my secret!

    --
    Troll Like a Champion Today
  36. email, the absurd history by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Mr. Watson--Come here--I want to see you."

    "Yes Mr. Tomlinson?"

    "Hi! How are you? I send you this file in order to have your advice. See you later. Thanks"

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  37. SPAM combat needed by Simm0 · · Score: 1

    Interesting seeing how many slashdot user emails are reworded etc. to stop them from getting spam.

    e-mail is basically at the point where something new needs to be thought up that isn't propriatry (free as in free speech) and works quite well without the possibility of SPAM going through it.

  38. More critical than we realized by Ldir · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My company had World Trade Center offices; our parent company was headquartered there and had a data center there. We also have offices all over the U.S. and a fair international presence. Our company has a fairly conservative approach to technology, viewing the revenue-producing, line-of-business applications as critical. Support applications such as office automation were considered nice-to-haves.

    Consequently, in our Business Continuity Plan, e-mail was designated a "Tier 2" application. This means that it was slated for recovery only after the critical business applications were restored. It was felt that e-mail was a nice-to-have that could easily be replaced with the telephone and fax in a crisis.

    This perception changed dramatically on September 11. We quickly learned how e-mail had become integral to the business. It was the communications mechanism that facilitated most of our internal information exchange. Restoring e-mail moved from second-tier to our highest priority because it was critical to recovery and to communicating with our scattered employees. With hundreds of dislocated people, it was the most reliable way for our clients and our employees to reach specific individuals.

    When future historians talk about the way technology revolutionized business, e-mail will be on the list. My company realized we can't do business without it.

    1. Re:More critical than we realized by SClitheroe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's some significant insight contained in this post. I work for a company that, stats wise, generates 4x the volume of email of any other company in Canada, on a per-employee basis (we've been doing email on IBM mainframes since before most companies had computers).

      Email is much more than just another form of messaging. I've seen email used as a form of decision records, as a primitive form of version control (the email thread contains each revision of the document in question), as discussion threads, and even as a form of middleware for some very significant applications (like train dispatching). In a company like mine, end-to-end delivery of email messages that exceeds 30 seconds is seen as a serious degradation of service (no kidding!)

      Consitent, timely, and reliable delivery of email in large companies (outside, perhaps, of large dot.com online sales companies) is arguably more important than nearly any other form of networking.

    2. Re:More critical than we realized by Howie · · Score: 1

      I've personally seen two buildings damaged by trains in my days as a commuter. Reading station before they rebuilt it had a train go straight off the end of it's line into the station, and a similar thing has happened in the past at Slough. You can still see the cutting-torch marks in the roof beams.

      Don't assume trains stay on rails because thats where you put them.

      --
      "don't fall into the fallacy of believing that Perl can solve social problems. Maybe Perl 6 can, but that's a ways off"
    3. Re:More critical than we realized by alexburke · · Score: 1

      I work for a company that, stats wise, generates 4x the volume of email of any other company in Canada, on a per-employee basis (we've been doing email on IBM mainframes since before most companies had computers).

      Which company would this happen to be?

  39. Email is a company by Mandelbrute · · Score: 1
    I'll vote for e-mail. There's an electrical appliance company called "Email."

    Then again, there's also one called "smeg."

  40. I can imagine by aozilla · · Score: 2

    If there were no email then there would be probably be an offline messaging feature of instant messaging. With access control lists built into most instant messaging providers, we'd have no spam. Sounds good to me.

    --
    ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
    1. Re:I can imagine by aozilla · · Score: 1

      yeah, except that ICQ SUCKS

      --
      ok then your [sic] infringing on my copyright! Could you as [sic] me next time before STEALING my comments for your own?
  41. 'You've got cake' by tenzig_112 · · Score: 2
    The technology behind e-mail does not seem to have changed much over the past three decades. Correct me if I'm wrong [as if you guys wouldn't], but every "advancement" in e-mail over the past decade or so has just served to screw it up- proprietary extensions [i.e. Exchange stuff] that are less than useless because the formatting either vanishes or shows up as garbage.


    Of course, there's spam. That's "new."

    1. Re:'You've got cake' by Richard+Fairthorne · · Score: 1

      TCP/IP had what I consider a positive impact on email.

  42. Okay, here's my PRIORITIES! by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny

    1) Refinance my mortgage
    2) Get some HOT TEENAGE SLUTS
    3) Buy printer cartriges
    4) Take a free vaction to Orlando, Florida
    5) Get a Legal Marijuana Alternative
    6) Boost my windows reliability
    7) Make my penis bigger
    8) Become wealthy working at home
    9) Have a personal relationship with God
    10) Say HI! to Dan. He has some HOT TEENAGER SLUTS for me.

    After all, if there wasn't email, how could I get PRIORITIES?

  43. Re:Emmail? by hendridm · · Score: 1

    yeah, good point :P I don't think it should be capitalized though since it's not a proper noun.

  44. Humble attitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Sometimes we get wound up in the politics and agendas of some members of our community.


    It's always a refreshing moment when one reads an article like this where a technology innovator (I'd say hero, but lately I like to reserve that term) is truly appreciative of what he's done but, while appreciative of what the impact has been, not motivated to drive an agenda with it.


    Yeah, this might be an intellectual flame - but I'll bet many agree with the basic point.

  45. Life without email by el+borak · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Can you imagine your life without email now?

    I've often wished I had the guts to take the same action as Donald Knuth and get rid of my e-mail address:

    • "... it seems to me that 15 years of email is plenty for one lifetime."

    Of course, I'll be the first to admit that DEK's time is more in demand than mine.

    --
    An imperfect plan executed violently is far superior to a perfect plan. -- George Patton
  46. WOW! ALL-CAPS IS THE OLD-SKOOL!!! by dopeghost · · Score: 1

    30 years with email, - optimistically I look forward to 30 days without a new outlook exploit

    --
    This UID is 7651 digits too high to subjectively infer IQ from.
  47. not clean by chocolatetrumpet · · Score: 2, Insightful


    >No dead trees and no stamps.


    Right. Lord knows, we all use clean electrical power sources these days!

    --
    Spoon not. Fork, or fork not. There is no spoon.
  48. 10 vs. 3-fingers by garoush · · Score: 5, Funny

    With email, I get to exercise ALL of my 10 fingers. While with pen-based-mail only 3 get used -- and some use only 2 fingers.

    I keep wandering how our parents managed life with only 2-3 fingers; must have been very boring. So what were they doing with the "other" hand?

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
    1. Re:10 vs. 3-fingers by Zalgon+26+McGee · · Score: 2, Funny

      ANd when I'm engaged in Highway communications, only one finger gets used (with any regularity)

      --

      ---

      Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman

    2. Re:10 vs. 3-fingers by armb · · Score: 1

      > When do you use your left thumb?

      Some people vary which thumb they use for space depending on which hand is used for the previous or next letter.

      http://www.zdnet.com/products/stories/reviews/0, 41 61,2309465,00.html suggests swapping thumb every hour to reduce stress in the tendons.

      --
      rant
    3. Re:10 vs. 3-fingers by kjell79 · · Score: 1

      > With email, I get to exercise ALL of my 10 fingers.

      That is unless you use windows, then you're just using the three finger salute.

    4. Re:10 vs. 3-fingers by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1


      I only use 2 fingers to write email -- one on each hand, unfortunately, so I can't put the other 8 to some other use at the same time.

      Just as well -- my officemates would probably look at me funny if I did.

      -Poot

  49. Knuth by srichman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don Knuth weighs in on this at the bottom of this page.

    1. Re:Knuth by andyNola · · Score: 1

      Knuth says:

      (Of course, ``email'' has been a familiar word in France, Germany, and the Netherlands much longer than in England --- but for an entirely different reason.)

      German: das Email -> enamel

      --
      -- This .sig is not here yet!
  50. Another look at Email by sasha328 · · Score: 1

    There is an article at Living Internet about the history of email. An interesting quote:

    Commercial Email. In 1989, MCI Mail and Compuserve provided the first commercial electronic mail connection to the Internet through the Corporation for the National Research Initiative (CNRI) and Ohio State University respectively.
    Does anyone else know of other early comercial implementations of email?

    1. Re:Another look at Email by mik · · Score: 1

      Note that The World (also known as Software Tool and Die) was also started in 1989, but it was (and is) a full-service public dialup ISP. Also of interest in this thread is that they own the "circled at-sign" trademark.

  51. Can you... by r_j_prahad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can you imagine your life without e-mail now?

    I try to, oh how I try to imagine, every waking minute of my day, how beautiful life would be without e-mail. I hate e-mail, I'm chronically abused and assaulted by e-mail. I have a boss who wields e-mail as a weapon. When he's pissed, he buries me under e-mail, and then wants to know why I can't get anything done. I've had days where he's sent me two-hundred e-mails, some with seven or eight attachments, paragraphs and pages and volumes and books of e-mail.

    This turd's office is only fifteen feet away from my cube, but I can't get a face-to-face with him. Because he's got e-mail. It's not a communications medium, it's an ass-covering medium.

    When I quit this job (and I have an interview this week) I'm going to mass-print a copy of every e-mail he's ever sent me on every goddamned printer in the company. It'll make our NIMDA infection look benign.

    1. Re:Can you... by Glytch · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could also call down a BSA audit on your soon-to-be-former company. It's even more effective if some of their licenses mysteriously vanish. Wink wink.

    2. Re:Can you... by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 1

      You could also call down a BSA audit on your soon-to-be-former company...

      Yes, all of those boy scouts setting up tents and lighting campfires in the office, will surely cause havoc.

      HH

    3. Re:Can you... by narroost · · Score: 1

      Filters young Jedi, you must learn to use filters!!!

      --
      Got Root!
  52. rob+slashdot.org by devinoni · · Score: 1

    What would the world be like with a + sign? Scary, but I think it's just the people at yahoo who seems to want this. http://www.reuters.com/news_article.jhtml?type=int ernetnews&StoryID=257307 shows the @ that we all know and love.

    1. Re:rob+slashdot.org by kireK · · Score: 1

      Of course, not long after you had slashdot.org!rob

  53. Knuth's view on this subject by Black+Acid · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what the original intent was, but Knuth says let's drop the hyphen. I have to agree with him. Think of how much time you would save by typing it email instead of e-mail. History shows language evolves to the point where the hyphen is omitted reguarly. Whens the last time you saw "main-frame" or "soft-boot"? Mainframe and softboot are the prefered forms, and for a good reason.

  54. First message was "HEL" by Codeala · · Score: 1

    I seems to remember watching a TV documentary about the early days of the internet. During a segment of the show, a guy who worked on the ARPANET project said the first email message send/receive was "HEL". The message is supposedly "HELLO" but the receiving program crashed after it got "HEL". Or maybe the sending program crashed? Can't remember which.

    Kind of funny if this is true, because HEL could easily be HELP! And this is before Outlook 1.0 ;-)

    The whole thing could be a dream, or about something completely different so don't bet on it.

    --

    Codeala - Just another mindless drone
    1. Re:First message was "HEL" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The original message was HELL STARTS HERE.

    2. Re:First message was "HEL" by whh3 · · Score: 1

      Actually, what you are referring to is from a Docuementary of the history of the internet called Triumph of the Nerds 2.0.1. And, the first message (across the internet) was "LOG". It was transmitted in an attempt to spell LOGIN but the program crashed. They checked the program (router), made a change, tried again and it worked. Coincidentally, it was one of the few government projects that was on budget and ahead of schedule -- go figure!

      --
      remove nospam. to email!
  55. Re:I know what smeg means by NonSequor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Email is French for enamel if I remember correctly. I believe the first e should have an acute accent though. The plural is emaux.

    --
    My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  56. ...but he knows it was in ALL CAPS by pj7 · · Score: 2, Funny
    The creator can't remember the first message, but he knows it was in ALL CAPS.

    ALL CAPS? I didn't think AOL was around in the 70's.

  57. Donald Ervin Knuth by mangu · · Score: 1

    ...a perfect anagram for "Hunt, Drink, and Love"

  58. if it were invented today... by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the patent office then was as fscked up as it is tody, e-mail could have been patented.

    And it would have gotten nowhere. It would not be the major phenomenon it is today.

    This is the perfect example with which to vigorous beat about the head and shoulders those who defend software patents as necessary to innovation. "What about e-mail, you dork?"

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  59. Happy BDay! by MathJMendl · · Score: 3, Funny

    Happy Birthday Email!! ILOVEYOU! I send you this file in order to have your advice. It contains information about how to make $100,000 per month, no risk! That's right, obtain a prosperous future with a college diploma for only $99!

    --


    "I have not failed. I've simply found 10,000 ways that won't work." --Thomas Edison
    1. Re:Happy BDay! by sharkey · · Score: 2

      ADDREG.EXE

      Mama Chili Recip.doc.pif

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  60. +1 Funny on the MQR standard by MarkusQ · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    *laugh*

    Cute.

    And not, dispite what someone seems to think, offtopic at all.

    --MarkusQ

  61. I have the opposite problem. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 3, Funny


    The standard general answer to this question is that Brazilian women won't have sex with a man unless they are in love. However, they sometimes fall in love very quickly.

    The specific answer is no. My problem is staying out of women's pants, not getting in.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
    1. Re:I have the opposite problem. by spood · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does sound like you have an 'opposite problem.' Wearing women's pants?

      --
      ---- Just another spud server.
    2. Re:I have the opposite problem. by betis70 · · Score: 1

      >>My problem is staying out of women's pants, not getting in. Don't forget your raingear! AIDS is high in Brasil.

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
  62. YOUR first email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He can't remember his, which is kinda sad. Can you remember yours? It would be fun (for real) to hear what people first used this "medium" for.

  63. Re:You moron! by yomegaman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Give up, dude. Its a loosing battle. There never going to get it. Your wasting you're time.

    --
    ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  64. Bit of email history by Simm0 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Interesting how the @ symbol wasn't added till a year later.

    1970
    Ray Tomlinson of BBN invents email program to send messages across a distributed network. The original program was derived from two others: an intra-machine email program (SENDMSG) and an experimental file transfer program (CPYNET)

    1972
    Ray Tomlinson (BBN) modifies email program for ARPANET where it becomes a quick hit. The @ sign was chosen from the punctuation keys on Tomlinson's Model 33 Teletype for its "at" meaning (March)


    1. Re:Bit of email history by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 1

      I believe it's "Where Wizards Stay Up Late (excellent history of the development of ARPANET) that mentions that Tomlinson chose the '@' symbol not only because of its meaning, but because it was one of the few characters not yet spoken for. Of course, there was one obscure OS that used '@' for something or other, and this stirred up a bit of controversy when these folks had to escape email addresses all over the place.

      (Too lazy to go in the living room and look up the exact reference, so I may be talking out my ass. What a surprise.)

      --

      What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

    2. Re:Bit of email history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Of course, there was one obscure OS that used '@' for something or other

      That would be Multics, which used @ to delete the current line input. Which made typing an email address on Multics quite fun, aparently.

      Still, Multics sites were outnumbered by TOPS10/TOPS20 and ITS sites and the @ won.

  65. To think... by gatesh8r · · Score: 1

    That ppl are still having caps-only emails...

    HI! I AM AN AOL USER I THINK THAT THE INTERNET IS A GREAT FEATURE NO I AM NOT SHOUTING AT ALL WHY DO YOU THINK THAT I AM DOING THAT FOR EVERYONE NEEDS TO GET AOL BECAUSE IT IS SO EASY

    And we're better than this -- we don't have to use punchcards anymore :-)

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  66. baud != bps (usually) by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
    Personally, I just like how 300 baud (which is 300 bps) is 1/20 of 56,600 bps. I had no idea that 6,000 = 56,600. It's a good thing we have journalists to do such extensive research and fact-checking; just think of how long the mathematicians have been overlooking that amazing equality!Or am I missing something here? :P

    The term baud can be very misleading. Technically it is just ``symbol per second'' which can mean bits per second, but usually meant (back then) bytes per second, Bps, so 300 baud would be 300Bps = 2400bps, which is roughly 1/20 of 56kbps. It can also mean characters per second, i.e., 300*7bps (proper ASCII is only 7bit), and it originated with the telegraphs and morse code (dit-dit-dit-dah-dah-dah-dit-dit-dit!). Such confusion is why the term is rarely used these days.

    1. Re:baud != bps (usually) by VultureMN · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Technically it is just ``symbol per second'' which can mean bits per second, but usually meant (back then) bytes per second, Bps, so 300 baud would be 300Bps = 2400bps"
      Umm. No.
      300 baud modems were indeed 300 bits per second. You're correct in the "symbols per second" thing, but everything including and below 2400 baud used one symbol per bit, so in those cases baud=bps. Higher modem speeds still run at 2400 baud, but use phase shifting and other tricks so that each symbol stands for N bits. For example, a 9600 bps modem works by each symbol representing 4 bits. 2400 baud times 4 bits/symbol equals 9600 bits per second.
      For the purposes of this discussion, "symbols per second" means you're sampling the carrier N times per second.

    2. Re:baud != bps (usually) by lazybeam · · Score: 1
      ...but everything including and below 2400 baud used one symbol per bit, so in those cases baud=bps. Higher modem speeds still run at 2400 baud...

      close.
      2400bps modems ran at 600 baud, with QAM encoding 4 bits to a baud (V.22bis). (Remember a baud is a [possible change in] signal) 9600bps modems ran at 2400 baud (V.32). They had those tricky phase shifting back in the 600 baud days :)
      This is true up to 33.6k (getting more complicated as speeds increased), and with 56k modems its different again, treating the PSTN more like ISDN.

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
    3. Re:baud != bps (usually) by VultureMN · · Score: 1

      Well hot damn! You're certainly correct. Thanks for the clarification.

  67. all caps? by User1234 · · Score: 1, Informative

    He must of been an aol user.

  68. The future of email by dgroskind · · Score: 2

    Email is come-from-behind technology. Although it predates voice mail and fax by nearly 15 years, it is only in the last 5 years or so that it rivals them in popularity.

    Despite its success, email hasn't supplanted either voice mail or fax. Nearly everyone who has email also uses voice mail or fax, often both at work and at home. In spite of the fact that both voice mail and fax can be sent as an email attachment, those two technologies show no signs of disappearing. The sales of fax machines continues to rise and voice mail appears to be at saturation.

    As near as I can surmise, both voice mail and fax have a higher degree of perceived urgency than email does. This urgency comes from the urgency of the technology they supplement or replace. Voice mail is a stand in for a telephone call itself, the most urgent form of communication. Faxes replaced couriers, which also were reserved for the most important documents.

    Email seems to be primarily used for non-urgent communication. Part of the reason is, perhaps, that the sender of email cannot be sure if the message has arrived. For voice mail, if you get the greeting and the beep, you are reasonably sure of delivery. For fax, the fax standard guarantees that the fax will not be sent unless it is being received at the other end.

    In one way, the urgency of email will probably not be determined by the message but by the attachments. The ability of email to move, store and forward electronic documents in a standardized way may determine its future development.

    In another way, the urgency of email will be raised by email messages generated by computer. Because email can be generated by computer much easier than voice mail and fax, more and more email could be of the alert variety that tells the recipient that something needs his attention.

    As a result I would look for some kind of encoding that flagged an email as urgent beyond simply the opinion of the sender. For instance, the email addresses that users give out might someday contain some unique priority designation so that priority could be determined by the source of the message.

    One can see the process at work now when sys admins have computers send email alerts to their pagers and cell phones.

    Once urgency can be reliably defined in an email message it could change its fundamental characteristic, which at the moment is convenience.

    1. Re: The future of email by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      I have no telephone at work. I have a phone line at home with no telephone attached...just a DSL modem. It isn't that I have no use for a telephone, but I wanted to see if I could manage using email as my only method of non-contact communication. It works fine. I understand that it won't work for everyone, but I recommend it for anyone who thinks it might be possible. Concentration is greatly enhanced: no longer do I suffer interruptions from anyone who can dial my number. Email is answered promptly, but at a time of my choosing. No longer am I beholden to interlopers.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    2. Re:The future of email by TV-SET · · Score: 1

      One can request a Return-Receipt-To: email . This will basically garantee that message has been received (not read or understood) by the other part.

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
    3. Re:The future of email by dgroskind · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are 3 problems with return receipt as it is now implemented:

      Some email clients to support it, like mine (elm).

      The user may not look at his email for days, as I often don't.

      The user may ignore it, as I often do when I use Outlook.

      What's needed is some standard. The fact that there isn't one after all these years suggests that users are happy with the level of reliability for the urgency of the messages.

      The inventor of email said he invented email not because anyone wanted it but because it was a neat idea. Probably if he had thought automatic return receipt was a neat idea, we'd have it now.

    4. Re: The future of email by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      I have been telephone free for almost 8 months now. Except at work, where I have one like everyone else, but its rare that I ever use it. I do have a cell phone, but its one of those special ones that only call 911 or a service station and its in my car at all times. You might be asking, how the hell do you order pizza? I walk down to the local place and order. Its rather unique not having a phone. It has actually helped me get more personal with people. Email is good for a short blurb, but nothing beats getting out and actually talking to people face to face.

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
    5. Re:The future of email by TV-SET · · Score: 1
      I believe that all those problems are appliable to fax, and/or telex, and/or any other means of communication.

      Some email clients to support it, like mine (elm).

      AFAIK, Return-Receipt-To is a standard, so lack of support for it is a problem of non-standard compliant e-mail client.

      The user may not look at his email for days, as I often don't.

      Same applies to faxes. I may be out of town or just not bothered :)

      The user may ignore it, as I often do when I use Outlook.

      That's pretty much the same as above.

      Return-Receipt-To guarantees that message reached destination mailbox - same as fax confirmation guarantees that fax message has been received by the other part and that remote fax machine is not out of paper or something.

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
    6. Re:The future of email by dgroskind · · Score: 1

      I believe that all those problems are appliable to fax, and/or telex, and/or any other means of communication.

      No method can guarantee the message was read but voice mail, fax and telex almost guarantee that the message was received. With email, you can never be sure. If the sender or receipient is having server problems, email can be stuck in a variety of holding queues for hours or days.

      Return-Receipt-To is a standard, so lack of support for it is a problem of non-standard compliant e-mail client.

      Email delivery problems occur before the email reaches the client. My point was that depending upon the email reaching the client for confirmation is not sufficient. The email may never reach the client because of problems upstream.

      As companies depend more on email they've made their email servers more reliable. However, what is needed is a protocol by which a server automatically sends back an acknowledgement that a message was received. Without this protocol, the usefulness of email for urgent and time-sensitive messages is impaired.

    7. Re:The future of email by TV-SET · · Score: 1
      I am missing something here... either I don't understand you correctly or...

      You say that: "Email delivery problems occur before the email reaches the client. My point was that depending upon the email reaching the client for confirmation is not sufficient. The email may never reach the client because of problems upstream." With Return-Receipt-To server automatically sends confirmation to the sender, when message reaches destination mailbox.
      And then you say exactly the same but about a new protocol: "However, what is needed is a protocol by which a server automatically sends back an acknowledgement that a message was received."

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
    8. Re:The future of email by dgroskind · · Score: 1

      Is there some confusion, perhaps on my part, between client and server here? Your previous comment said, "Return-Receipt-To is a standard, so lack of support for it is a problem of non-standard compliant e-mail client." I assumed you were saying that return receipt was a function of the client rather than the server.

      Reading over the SMTP specs there seems to be more handshaking than I thought. Certainly, servers are prompt in sending "mailbox not found" messages back to the sender.

      I was under the impression that mail could be delayed at some point in the relay chain without the sender being aware of it or being notified of it until much later. If I'm wrong, I appreciate you taking the time to make it clear.

      There should be a way of returning undeserved karma points in such cases.

    9. Re:The future of email by TV-SET · · Score: 1
      I was under the impression that mail could be delayed at some point in the relay chain without the sender being aware of it or being notified of it until much later. If I'm wrong, I appreciate you taking the time to make it clear.

      Well, mail can get stack and I don't want to argue on that one :)

      Maybe, what I was trying to say is that normally it takes up to under few minutes for e-mail message to get to the destination point. If sender requests a confirmation with his message, and he/she does not receive it withing reasonable time then he/she knows that the message got stack somewhere, in which case something terrible should be done :) like resending the message or contacting the recepient, etc :)

      --
      Leonid Mamtchenkov ...i don't need your civil war...
  69. Life without email by Dalgar · · Score: 1

    I have 4 email accounts, but I never get any mail on any of them. The only message I got was from someone saying hello, and welcome to Outlook, and that was like a year ago. So, I suppose my life with email is exactly the same as it would be without email.

  70. E-Mail is not 30 years old today. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 5, Informative



    E-Mail is more than 30 years old. Doug Englebart's NLS system was doing email for years prior to '71, and infact, demonstrated it publically in '68.

    Get your facts straight, gang.

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:E-Mail is not 30 years old today. by Lxy · · Score: 2

      It would figure. Keep in mind that Yahoo broke this story.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    2. Re:E-Mail is not 30 years old today. by ryantate · · Score: 1
      Keep in mind that Yahoo broke this story.

      Reuters broke the story, Yahoo is not a newsgathering organization.

    3. Re:E-Mail is not 30 years old today. by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      It looks like it was sending significant messages between two machines, but it looked more connection oriented.

      First of all, there were only two machines involved, I'm not sure if the stuff they demoed was designed to work with more than two, but it didn't look like it.

      Secondly, it all looked like you connected to another machine then sent the message to the other user. I don't think they had the concept of addressing another user at another machine and letting the system do the transport work.

    4. Re:E-Mail is not 30 years old today. by dgroskind · · Score: 2

      Englebart was no doubt years ahead of his time but email as we know it is traced back to Tomlinson.

      As the article about Ray Tomlinson says:
      Like a number of then existing electronic message programs, the oldest dating from the early 1960s, SNDMSG only worked locally; it was designed to allow the exchange of messages between users who shared the same machine. Such users could create a text file and deliver it to a designated "mail box."

      Tomlinson's achievement seems to have been "transferring files among linked computers at remote sites within ARPANET", that is creating users' mail boxes accessable over ARPNET, which did not exist as such before 1968.

      As Englebart describes the system: "Each individual has private file space, and the group has community space, on a high-speed disc with a capacity of 96 million characters." The system therefore doesn't appear to be the network environment that Tomlinson was working in.

      Englebart's list of Pioneering Firsts is said to include "integrated hypermedia email" but the term email may be an anachronism in this context.

  71. Nimda, an email virus?? by netsharc · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Along with the "+" sign error, the article mentions that email helped spread the Nimda virus. As we all know the only thing helping Nimda spread is Microsoft's security hole. Hmmm... some journalist didn't check his information.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  72. Is that "the first Internet E-mail"? by mj6798 · · Score: 2
    As I have heard history told, E-mail systems were in use before 1971. E-mail is said to have started by people leaving files for each other in various places on a time sharing system. Then, to make this easier, various scripts and clients were created.

    Tomlinson apparently was the first to send E-mail via the Internet (or any network?), and he is said to actually have adapted a time sharing mail program to do this.

  73. Before Email by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Of course, before email similar functions were (and Still are!) performed by Telex. There is a fascinating history of Telex here

    Telex sprang from the same source as the Volkswagen automobile: The creative growth era of the early Third Reich. It was devised as a means of distributed military command and control messages and data in a time before we eve had a structure for data processing machinery. What existed at that point in time was 455 bps Baud automatic telegraph and dial-using telephone exchanges. The original Telex was essentially (director-controlled; yes, the Europeans were doing hat then) rotary telephone switches modified to carry DC telegraph lines, providing a switched service for teletypewriters in the same way as was done for telephones.

    There is even a brief discussion on how to access telex from your email.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Before Email by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      Just found the link.

      This is all discussed in all the geekish detail you could ever want in the Telecom Digest, a eighteen (18!) year archive of discussion about telecom technology.

      TELECOM Digest was founded in August, 1981, by Jon Solomon. It has been published continuously since that time. The location has changed over the years. It has been published at MIT, at Boston University, at Rutgers, and for about six years (since 1989) at Northwestern University, Evanston, IL. We are back at MIT as of November, 1995.

      TELECOM Digest is distributed on several networks: In addition to the mailing list, the Digest appears on Usenet as the 'comp.dcom.telecom' (moderated) news group.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    2. Re:Before Email by Thatman311 · · Score: 1

      Likely the word "reich" (sound like rish) is used because frankly it sounds cooler than relm.

      Blah blah blah... Third Relm ...blah blah blah.

      That is lame. Also when I was in school it was always taught to us as "Third Reich".

      --
      Silly Rabbit...Sig's are for kids.
    3. Re:Before Email by BadDoggie · · Score: 1
      I never expected Joey G to hang around babelfish. As (former) Minister of Propaganda, you'd think he'd know that Reich is better translated as "Empire" than as "Realm".

      However, English prefers the German word and the rseulting ramifications.

      Also, while "fyoorer" is not the ideal pronounciation of "Führer", it is indeed the closest that most English-speakers are ever gonna get to the proper pronounciation. If I was you, I'd worry more about the mispronounciation of my name -- GER-blls (rhyming with gerbils or fur-balls), indeed! I think "Go-blls" (like "snow-balls") might be preferable,.

      What a bunch of kooks, them Nazis. The ones saying blonde-and-blue-eyed is the elite of genetics all had brown hair and eyes. The one who preached euthanasia for all children born with birth defects (the "life not worth living") himself had a clubfoot. I could go on for hours. What a hoot!

      Oh yeah, moderators: I took the "No Score +1 Bonus" already, so don't waste your points modding this down further. This thread looked rather whimsical already, and sometimes you just have to answer some nutbag, even if it's off-topic.

      woof.

      "Dressing up like Hitler is not cool, Cartman!"

    4. Re:Before Email by kiwaiti · · Score: 1
      Don't expect to be able to teach anyone how to pronounce "ch" or "ü" without audio examples and feedback on their own attempts. "ch" is especially hard because its pronounciation varies with the preceding vowel (a,o,u vs. e,i,ä,ö,ü or blank).

      I shall not comment on your Nazi posing. It would deserve a -1 handicap - -2 even (effectively destroying your offending login name).

      I will, however, state that you are not representative of the average german population (as if anyone would suspect that), much as Timothy McVeigh is not representative of the average USian population.

      Kiwaiti

      --
      Member of the Legion Of Microsoft Haters
  74. +1 informative on the MQR standard by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
    Thanks for the link, and the perspective.

    -- MarkusQ

  75. TESLA NOT MARCONI! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Tesla invented the radio damnit! Not Marconi!

  76. Texas Instruments +30 by bstadil · · Score: 2, Informative

    TI has a system called MSG that functioned a text based email system. I used it in 1974 in Denmark and it had been in use for more than five years in the US I was told at the time. It connected all TI sites around the world but the system was based on an IBM 360 something.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  77. first mail after reading this by sconeu · · Score: 3
    It's funny... this is the first mail I received after reading this article...


    From Degree_Program@University_World Mon, 01 Oct 2001 02:27:33 -0700
    Received: [deleted]
    Message-ID: [deleted]
    From: Degree_Program@University_World
    Bcc: [deleted]
    To: [deleted]
    Subject: Diplomas from prestigious universities in days.
    Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 05:18:05 -0400 (EDT)
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    U N I V E R S I T Y D I P L O M A S

    Obtain a prosperous future, money earning power,
    and the admiration of all.

    Diplomas from prestigious non-accredited
    universities based on your present knowledge
    and life experience.

    No required tests, classes, books, or interviews.

    Bachelors, masters, MBA, and doctorate (PhD)
    diplomas available in the field of your choice.

    No one is turned down.

    Confidentiality assured.

    CALL NOW to receive your diploma
    within days!!!

    1 - 9 1 7 - 5 9 1 - 3 0 0 1

    Call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, including
    Sundays and holidays.
    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  78. The First Email by SkewlD00d · · Score: 1

    "QWERTIOP", two machines in the same room at Cambridge, supposedly according to here.
    Stanford claims that they were the recipient of the first data communication.

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  79. Your timescale is off. by rjnerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Fax and voicemail have been around for a very long time. The earliest patents for fascimile machines are only slightly newer than those of teletypes. (19th century). You could even get cheap machines as WW2 surplus, many ham radio operators played with the technogy in the 50's and 60's. It was a niche technogy (mostly used by the newspaper photo distribution services) until the Japanese wanted a way to send documents to each other electronically. An ASR-33 doesn't cut it when you have a page of kanji to transmit. Until then the west was happy to send each other telex messages.

    Voicemail is otherwise known as an answering machine. I admit I had email before I owned an answering machine, but in the days before Bell allowed "foreign" devices to connect to their lines, answering machines were fairly uncommon.

    Certainly once you could get a magnetic wire recorder, you could do an answering machine. The oldest unit I have heard of, dates from the late 30's. (I am sure someone tried it with phonograph technology, but I don't think it was commercially viable.)

    If you are looking for a business practice changing technology that is newer than email, try FEDEX.

    One question I proposed for the Nerd Purity tests (the long ones with the possibility of >500 point scores). 2 points for having an email address in high school. If you are class of '85 or earlier, add 2 points for each year. Class of '75 or earlier, add 5 points per year.

    As to the + vs @ nomenclature: I remember in 1977 spending 10 minutes explaining to a business card printer just what that blob was (at sign didn't cut it, he needed "commercial at" before he got it. There wasn't a typewriter handy so I could point.), and that "DP@MIT-ML" was correct, and "DP @ MIT-ML" wasn't.

    Oh yea, as to the UPPER CASE, the commonly available terminals of the day didn't provide it.

    -dp-

    --
    Organizer:New England Rubbish Deconstruction Society;The NERDS,first US team in the UK Scrapheap Challenge/Junkyard Wars
  80. Re:I know what smeg means by Moses+Lawn · · Score: 1

    Oh, I like that. Now I can say "look at all that emaux I have" or "I sent the emaux to Al and Betty" today. Reduces the ambiguity of a plural form that can be the same as the singular.

    Of course, it's entirely too cutsey to live, so scratch that idea. Please. In fact, delete this entire post before Jon Katz or some marketing droid picks it up. Please, I beg you.

    (Apologies for the gratuitous Jon Katz hit)

    --

    What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?

  81. 30 Years by Aurelfell · · Score: 1

    So all I have to do is buy that time machine on ebay, go back to 1971, and kill the people who invented it. Then I'll never hear "you've got mail" again. Totally worth it.

  82. The real question... by Ridge · · Score: 1

    "Most likely the first message was QWERTYIOP or something similar."

    What does he have against U?

  83. Read the question everyone: WAS it intended . . . by dananderson · · Score: 1
    c) e-mail. Only later was it shortened to email.

    Actually, many or most ./ers seem to be born after email was invented.

    I used to call it "electronic mail" or "computer mail" or usually just "mail." Only in the mid- or late 1980s did I hear "e-mail."

  84. Glad to be alive and free by Evil+MarNuke · · Score: 1

    What should our priorites be? Drop everything we do? Not move on? What kind of country would we become if that happened?

    Let me tell that I'm more worried about the whole mess then most people. I understand how grave the sitution is. I still can't believe they are gone. I also realize that life must and will go on. There is no stopping that.

    I feel deep regret for the people who lost thier lives and the brave souls that lost thier lives to save those people. I support our government and Bush 100%. I can't just stop everything I do and morn forever. I can't quit my job and join the Navy. That is not my place. That is not what God whats me to do. He's leading me somewhere. He has a plan for me in the days to come. My place right now is to live my life and not let the terrorist win. You sir, are suggesting we stop everything and live a life in terror. I rather be dead then to have my freedom taken away.

    If anything our country has realized the value of life. Become right with God through his son Jesus. Not tomorrow. Not Sunday. Not in a month. Right now. You never know when you will die.

    --
    The journey is better then the end.
  85. If only they knew. by jcr · · Score: 2

    Back in high school in Fairfax County, VA, we had a couple of HP machines that we time-shared with the rest of the schools in the county.

    We had a series of chat-type programs which were forbidden by the administrators, since we were supposed to use the computers for computing. (That is, generating square root tables and printing our names in an endless loop.) To implement these apps, we needed to have files with multi-writer access, which only the sysops were able to create, so what did we do? We cracked them, of course!

    Even then, circa 1979, we knew what computers were *really* for.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  86. Maybe it's about time... by sfe_software · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe it's about time some new standards are formed? I bet the SPAM problem would be much better if we had some form of SMTP-authorization that was standardized. I know there have been many attempts, but no two clients support the same few methods... Open-relays worked 30 years ago, but times change.

    On a lighter note, I couldn't imagine life without email.

    --
    NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
  87. So... by CdotZinger · · Score: 2, Funny


    Is it

    emai-l (the Japanese porn star from Star Trek)
    ema-il (verb meaning "oozing from a French guy")
    em-ail (Ebonics for "they are sick")

    or

    e-mail? (some special kind of mail)

    I wonder. If only I had more information....


    --
    Your mouth is like Columbus Day.
  88. First message transfered by frambris · · Score: 1

    A tad off topic but cool anyway.

    The first message ever transfered over what was to become Internet (it wasn't even ARPAnet at the time, I believe) was the three letters Log. It was the three first letters of Login: but the protocol stack crashed after three letters =).

    Maybe the Microsoft brains crashed when they tried to type HTML and it became htm...

  89. first email by waterbiscuit · · Score: 1
    I very much remember my first email. It was my first IT lesson at school 5 years ago. We set up hotmail accounts and to this day I still use it for emails to friends. I remember the painstaking trouble of learning what a link was, and how it could possibly work- the internet was some sort of surreal supernatural thing you connected to through a modem. And what on earth did I want to use the internet for? "searching" said the guy next door, but I didn't have anything to search for. Was that all it could do? I used the computers mainly for email after that, the web was still somewhat of a mystery and its uses were not to become apparent for another year or two.

    After email came about a month of yahoo chat rooms, then I progressed to icq, then irc where I learnt most of my knowledge about computers. Interestingly my range of friends started off very wide- people from hawaii, honk kong, malaysia and the states (I'm british). Now I mostly chat to UK friends. It was through IRC that I learnt about computers- usenet and then this thing called linux which by this time I just had to try. And so I'm here now not quite geek since I can't code except html. But without a doubt the reason I first used computers was for email, so thankyou to its inventor for more or less changing my life.

  90. Instant messaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The hassle of typing combined with the intrusion of a phone call. No thanks.

    1. Re:Instant messaging by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Amen brother. I got a cell and disconnected my land line. I only turn the cell on when I want to place a call.

      Suddenly, no more telemarketers, assholes from work with stupid questions that "just can't wait", etc.

      IM strikes me as yet another way to be bothered when I just don't want to be bothered. Unlike email, that I can wait to answer for days, weeks, or even just throw away. Maybe IM is a toy for the young and impatient, people who *want* constant stimulation in their lives.

      Email - if I could ditch the phone altogether and just use email, I would.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  91. Re:Emmail? by Amanset · · Score: 2

    Not unless it was spelled emmail. Vowels followed by one consonant and then more vowels are typically long, in English.

    Utter tosh. This make work for thoroughbred Germanic lanuages, like German and the Nordic languages, but English has had too much of a Latin influence (for example, years of occupation by France) for such generalisms.

    Try speaking to someone who has learned English as a second language. English may be very simple in terms of structure (no sex for nouns and suchlike) but what makes it difficult is pronunciation - they are next to no rules on how things are pronounced. You have to start using the language to learn it, it cannot be learned by reading rules in books.

  92. The future of email is Unified Messaging... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    There are unified messaging projects and products starting to come that will allow you to consolidate all your data. This has to be one of the most important time saving ideas. Get your voicemail on the web, listen to your Email or IM on the phone, Fax on the web, text to speech, etc.

    Another consolidation that I really like, is Instant messaging products, like Tillian. I can now get my AOL/AIM/Yahoo/ICQ/IRC in one program. (The irc is ok, but I'll stick with mirc and bitchx)..

    --
    Another Verizon customer, DSL'less in Seattle.

  93. The first email. by vidarlo · · Score: 1

    I think that any of the comments under is right.
    But you'll have to define whats email and whatsfile sharing.
    But if u say that a email shall contain a adress, for example needing to include a @ sign and a domain, then can u say "That is the first email".
    And I do not know the details of this message in 1971, but I suppose it is /almost/ right.
    It is not a big lie if u say this is the first email,thus there might be older emails than that.

  94. Bandwidth by klykken · · Score: 1

    The article describes their usage of 300 baud modems in 1971. In 1989 I used a 1200 baud manual modem, and in 1990 a fantastic 2400 baud (with Hayes, whee!)

    So during the 18 years between 1971 and 1989, the bandwidth had increased just 8x. Today, I have 2048kbit at home, giving me an increase of bandwidth the last 11 years of an astonishing 853 times 2400 baud, or 6827 times 300 baud.

    What lies before us in the next decade is surely food for thought. Also, we'll need more bandwidth to cover for the year 2011 equavilent of annoying popup banner ads ;-/

    --
    Looks like a fish, drives like a fish, steers like a cow.
  95. Just think..... by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    What if the internet had never come about?!?!?! We might all actually have lives ;)

  96. If the first post was all caps... by Stalcato · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...then the first reply must have been;

    Stop shouting!

    Cat.

  97. I don't quite remember my first email ether. by darkonc · · Score: 2
    It was back in 1979, on MTS (Michigan Terminal System) at the University of Alberta, where I'd bought a computer account while in High School. Previous to that, we'd had an in-hous messaging system (simply called 'mail).

    Mail was pretty simple. Everybody who wanted to use it, created a file 'mail' in their home directory which was permitted append-only others. (You think ACLs are a new idea?). The mail program took your message, added a header, and appended it to the end of the recipient's mail box. (much like UNIX mail does, except that the destination mailboxes were decentralized).

    The first multi-system mail had interesting routing features. I remember a message from Edmonton to Calgary (180 miles south of Edmonton) went south to the states, through New York and California before arriving in Calgary via Utah.

    Not long afterwards I got introduced to Unix, and the Usenet. Needless to say I was hooked. I was soon expounding the values of email to everybody who would listen. -- trying to get them to understand why it was, in so many ways, better than fax, for most written communications.

    It was almost a crusade -- trying to get as many people as possible onto email. Even back then, I was into remote administration -- running boxes from home over a 300 baud modem with a homemade terminsl program. I still remember one person replying to one of my emails:

    Is your system clock completely out of whack, or is that really when you sent that email?
    The clock was accurate.
    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  98. Same Age by bruceg · · Score: 1

    Wow, I just celebrated my 30th on Monday, too.

  99. Another fine set of facts from Yahoo by not_cub · · Score: 2
    Here is my own sarcastic take on the some of the "facts" from the article:


    He also conceived the now-famous ``+'' symbol to ensure a message was sent to a designated recipient.


    + was pretty famous for years before that. This is not the 5000th anniversary of addition. And how did they miss the correct symbol by such a margin anyway?


    And, the top-of-the-line modem connection at the time operated at a snail-like 300 baud, roughly one-twentieth of the speed of today's standard 56.6 kbps modem.


    300*20=6000 ... 300*200=60000


    Calculators are cheap... please get one.


    Another major stage in its development came in the mid-90s as the first Web browsers introduced the World Wide Web to the couch potato.


    The world wide web must have been fairly lame before the invention of the browser.


    not_cub

    --
    q='echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"';s=\';b=\\;echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"
  100. He was born in 1975 by wiredog · · Score: 2

    Reagan came into office in Jan 81. I remember Apollo 11 landing on the Moon, and I was only 4.

  101. One century by wiredog · · Score: 2

    In less than 70 years, one persons lifetime, we went from the first airplane to Apollo 11. My grandmother could remember the first time she saw an automobile, and the horse and wagon the family owned. In less than 60 years computers have gone from building sized machines that added numbers slightly faster than a slide rule, to Palm Pilots. I learned how to use a slide rule in high school. I'm only 36, and I remember the first color TV my family got. We live in a different world than our parents did, and our children will live in one that is different still.

  102. THE PRICE IS RIGHT! ;) by TheBiggerSteve · · Score: 1

    Oddly enough Oct 1, "The Price is Right" game show also had their 30th anniversary. Coincidence? I don't think so. Conspiracy? Maybe. Joke on us by God/Aliens? Probably. I wonder if they will cancel e-mail AND that game show when Bob Barker dies? ;)

  103. ObLogan'sRun by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    "Make Carousal Fast!"

    "Yes! You can gain Sanctuary in the privacy of your home!"

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  104. history of uucp style email addresses? by Corporate+Gadfly · · Score: 1

    Can somebody explain the history of uucp style email addresses?

    --
    Corporate Gadfly
    Jonathan Archer: the most beaten up Enterprise captain in Star Trek history
  105. save another keystroke and your privacy by twitter · · Score: 2
    Drop the e. Why bother calling it email, when it should be looked on as mail like any other post? The sooner people stop thinking of their personal correspondence by computer as something different, new and disposable, the sooner they will demand privacy for their mail.

    What's in a name? Lots!

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  106. Obfuscation contests are so cliche... by Wdomburg · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Why not do a readable Intercal contest instead?

  107. The death of SPAM via punch cards by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

    If we assume that a spammer would have an automated program to generate the emails, as is done today, consider that the spammer's mailing lists would probably have been stored on punch cards; that would have been one hell of a stack of cards for each email the guy sent out. True, they could have stored the list on tape, but considering the availability of a card reader vs. tape drives (in an academic or research environment), I'd bet on the cards. And, each address would have to be hand -entered at some point, vs. the address scanning/mining of today. Ah, the good old days ;)

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  108. The first email relationship by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1
    Can't recall the very first email I sent, but in college in 1982, I do recall the first email relationship I had... a friend worked as a co-op in a EE lab, and his female coworker and I sent each other many emails, from nice to naughty. Local email, of course... This went on for months. We finally met at the end of spring semester... being the classic nerd that I was (am), I must have been a great disappointment to her, because the emails stopped after that! ;)

    Come to think of it, I've probably ruined more relationships with email than preserved them.

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  109. True, but... by Randy+Rathbun · · Score: 2

    wasn't Englebart's email program limited to only sending email to users of that machine?

  110. Article misquotes Samuel Morse, slightly by TalkingToes · · Score: 1

    As I was reading, realised that the quote was sightly wrong. The correct version is "What hath God wrought", same words, capitalized correctly. He quoted from the Bible, (book of) Numbers 23:23, per the Library of Congress.

    --
    5'16" is easy math, so why do so many miss it?
    1. Re:Article misquotes Samuel Morse, slightly by Octal · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's "WHAT HATH GOD WROUGHT", in all caps. Morse code actually used all caps specifically so that God would never be lowercase.

  111. Sept. 21. by kannen · · Score: 1
    Perhaps the date should then be set at Sept. 21 - which is the first day of fall.

    Hmm??? Likey likey??

  112. Before the at@ there was the bang! by Stavr0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Before @ addresses were common we had bang paths where our email would hop from host to host with the UUCP protocol.

    mailto:sprintlink!exodus!andover!slashdot!stavr0

  113. Is this really correct? by Evil+Attraction · · Score: 1

    According to one of Norway's most respected computer gurus, Gisle Hannemyr, this isn't correct; Email is older than 30 years. There is an article about this in the Norwegian computer magazine digi.no. I'll try to translate the most important bits of the article to English:

    "- When we talk about e-mail being 30 years old (ie. it was invented in October 1971), it might be because Tomlinson also made an e-mail solution called SENDMSG and CPYNET for BBN's proprietary Tenex network in 1971."

    Hannemyr further says that this is pretty irrelevant when it comes to e-mail over the ARPAnet (and Internet); "- It is e-mail we send over the today's Internet which is 30 years old. E-mail itself is much older, and have been around since the MIT-developed Compatible Time Sharing System in the sixties."

    Whatever is right, I guess we all can conclude that without e-mail, we would have had time to live a normal life. All of us... :-)

    --
    No, I didn't write this signature

  114. The terrorists used email, we should get rid of it by mergy · · Score: 1

    I think we really need to think how email played a part in the terrorist attack on 9-11-01. I wonder what the people who invented email are thinking now that their technology is being used for evil.

    I heard they used IBM laptops too - wonder what IBM is thinking now that their tools are being used for terrorism.

  115. Imagine he'd patented it.... by mdemeny · · Score: 1
    ... he'd either be insanely rich, or we'd still be using friggin' fax machines.

    There's a good case to be made for some inventions being public domain (or something similar)

  116. '+' sign - you're all getting it wrong. by sr105 · · Score: 1
    It says clearly, "to ensure a message was sent to a designated recipient."

    Some mail servers treat addresses like substrings when they match more than one username on a system. So, mail to brian@somesite.com would be delivered to brian, brianm, brianr, and so on. However, brian+@somesite.com will only be delivered to brian, and not any of the others.
    If I remember correctly, Carnegie Melon has a system like this.

    So, indeed, the '+' sign is in fact used "to ensure a message was sent to a designated recipient. "

    R.

  117. Thanx to E-Mail I got LAID!!!! by typikalteen · · Score: 1

    Without E-Mail my fat white ass wouldn't have met the crazy nympho that I fucked and tried to leave. Just too bad the internet is home to stalkers she still hasn't left!!

  118. I wrote an email program in 1965 by thvv · · Score: 1
    Noel Morris and I wrote the MAIL command for MIT's CTSS system on the 7094 in 1965. Yes, in those days we used 6-bit BCD for messages, so they were all upper case. MAIL was used by several thousand registered users of the two MIT systems. This program was the ancestor of the Multics and Unix mail commands. See
    http://www.multicians.org/thvv/mail-history.html
    for more on the history of mail and instant messaging.
  119. Re:I know what smeg means by jrockway · · Score: 1

    The plural is emaux.
    Kinda like emacs, right?

    --
    My other car is first.
  120. email or e-mail by Dollyknot · · Score: 1

    I've always wondered what function of the dash is, obviously it is to be able to differentiate between email and e-mail I can see that quite well, what baffles me is what that distinction is, at a guess I would think it is a class distinction, but arguing with myself I would state class distinction is a purely British phenomena, so I'm still unable to understand this nuance of internet ettiquette. On further reflection I suppose it is akin to the difference between viruses and virii.

    --
    It's called an elephant's trunk whereas it is in fact, an elephant's nose, a nose by any other name would smell as sweet
  121. First Email by KurdtX · · Score: 2

    Ok, I was half asleep when my Prof said this (so it may not be exact); but he's not the kind to BS, and he actually has the connections to these kind of people. He said it was something like:

    Hey Mike, this is a test. Call me if you get this.

    Yeah, the name is probably wrong and he might have been asking for a fax, but it just sounds so Engineer-like that I believe it.

    --

    Kurdt
    I'm not anti-social. Just pro-technology.
  122. First message by jariv · · Score: 1

    "
    Hi! How are you?

    I send you this file in order to have your advice

    See you later. Thanks
    "