Slashdot Mirror


Linux 2.4.15 is out; Linux 2.5.0 has also begun.

jbondjr writes: "It appears 2.4.15 is released. It's not quite updated on kernel.org's main page, but it is there if you dig through the tree. You can find 2.4.15 on one of your friendly Kernel.org Mirrors (note the 2.4.15 Changelog) From the 2.5 readme: "Linux-2.5.0 is exactly the same as 2.4.15, except for a version number change." So, enjoy the The 2.5 Tree

211 comments

  1. Bealch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Mmmmm... Turkey!

    1. Re:Bealch... by Sarcasm_Orgasm · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Turkey may be good, but nothings as Mmmmm as that chick in the datapipe ad...I've wacked it so much half my keys are sticking.
      --
      Score:-1, Truth

      --
      Special people have long socks, ride short buses, & invent witty sigs.
    2. Re:Bealch... by George+WIPO+Bush · · Score: -1

      I prefer these girls. Look at those feet!! Hours of lonely, sticky fun!

      --

      J. Wipo Troll, Esq.
      Crapflooder Associates
      Slashdot.org

  2. When will they exorcise decimal? by Derek+Finch · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Decimal is evil! I hear it infects linux. Use hexadecimal or binary!

  3. second! by Billly+Gates · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    !!!

    1. Re:second! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think the average stormtrooper knows how to install a toilet main? All they know is killing and white uniforms.

  4. Release by mroeder · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is this Freshmeat or Slashdot ?

    This isn't a new question - I know. But really does /. have to act as an advertising board for EVERY kernel release increment ?

    2c

    1. Re:Release by aliebrah · · Score: 2
      But really does /. have to act as an advertising board for EVERY kernel release increment ?
      This isn't just any kernel release, this is the release of 2.5.0, the new kernel development branch.
    2. Re:Release by Mercury · · Score: 1

      This is the release where Linus hands over the stable tree to someone else. AND the announcement of the first kernel of the new devel tree. Thus, it is news.
      Yeesh.
      Zephaniah E. Hull.

    3. Re:Release by atheos · · Score: 1

      yea, but slashdot posts releases, regardless.
      For the complainer, you can always go to your preferences, and select Linux articles to be excluded from your frontpage.
      I noticed that the article wasn't available to me, until I logged in anyway.
      Maybe that's a slashdot tactic to rid some of the AC posts.

    4. Re:Release by bclz · · Score: 1

      Yeah~ It's Big News for OS

    5. Re:Release by gabba_gabba_hey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Bleh, whatever... This comes up every time a kernel release is announced on /. I for one like to see these releases announced on the front page. If you don't like it, edit your preferences. Perhaps I should just check kernel.org every day and see whats up, or freshmeat. The fact is that I've grown accustomed to coming here as my first news spot of the day and generally just get new kernel release info from here - as it's always here. Personally, I don't mind a bit.

    6. Re:Release by MartinG · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is this Freshmeat or Slashdot ?

      It's slashdot. You can tell it is because it says "Slashdot - News for nerds" at the top.

      You can easily recognise freshmeat when you see it as well - it has a logo at the top with "FM" written in it.

      I'm surprised you have difficulty telling them apart. They really are quite different.

      --
      -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
    7. Re:Release by szo · · Score: 1

      IMO he's right. /. should have a separate topic for software release announcements, so people can exclude them. Now you can't just exclude linux, because a lot of other stuff is running under the same topic.
      Or: /. could have sub-topic, or topic-modifier flags, so one could exclude linux-announcement, gimp-announcement, and so on...

      Szo

      --
      Red Leader Standing By!
    8. Re:Release by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 3, Funny

      My guess is that the Slashdot editors do this to answer the eternal philosophical question:

      "How many people who can't read 'use the mirrors' can fit over a 100MB pipe?"

      :)

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
    9. Re:Release by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Ahem...

      Yes.

    10. Re:Release by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has mirrors?!!

  5. ep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This early post for Ida!

  6. A Condensed History of the Penis Bird by Klerck · · Score: -1

    For years now, the common American penis bird has been a staple of every American's daily diet. Whether it be penis bird sandwiches, fried penis bird, or perhaps penis bird under glass (for the rich), we all have penis bird at least once a day. Many Americans have no clue how the penis bird became so important in the pyramid of a balanced diet, so in this article I will attempt to explain its history and why it is so useful.

    In the early 1870s, Francis Zefran became the first penis bird breeder in North America. He started his famous Penis Bird Ranch in Canton, OH. At the time, not much was known of the penis bird's nutritional value, but the Penis Bird Ranch changed all of that. Not only did Francis Zefran raise penis birds to sell their colorful plumes (a VERY lucrative business), he also set up the world's first research lab dedicated solely to the study of the penis bird.

    The lab found many interesting things. First, it was discovered that the penis bird was actually semi-sentient. Second, the scientists found that the meat of the penis bird was high in protein, vitamin A, vitamin B, and calcium, while low in fat, cholestorol, and sodium. Never before had such a nutritious meal been had without supplement or fortification. The scientists of the lab recommended immediately that the penis bird become a part of every American's daily diet.

    When the news of the penis bird's usefulness reached president Rutherford B. Hayes, he was absolutely ecstatic. You see, President Hayes owed a number of favors to Francis Zefran because as I said earlier, the penis bird plume trade was an extremely lucrative business and Mr. Zefran was important in getting RBH elected through a number of monetary gifts. President Hayes immediately asked Congress to pass what we all know today as the Hayes/Zefran Penis Bird Consumption Act.

    The act did a number of things to make the penis bird a daily meal, most important of which was the requirement that for every four people in a household, one penis bird must consumed every day. Another thing the act did was create an artificial monopoly for Francis Zefran's Penis Bird Industries. The act stated that the only supplier of penis bird meat in the US would be PBI. As one would imagine, this quickly made Francis Zefran into the richest man in the world. He was soon a multi-billionaire (quadrillionaire with today's inflation). Never before had a single man seen such wealth.

    Many challenges were made to the Hayes/Zefran Penis Bird Consumption Act, and several even made it the Supreme Court. It was argued that the act was unconstitutional and went against liberty itself, but once the detractors tasted delicious penis bird meat for the first time, they immediately dropped their cases and followed the law to the letter. We all know today that penis bird is the most delicious meat man has ever known, but at that time, the only meats people ate were pork and beef.

    In the early 1970s, though, challenges to the act began again. Many argued that the monopoly given to Penis Bird Industries by the act was in all ways unamerican. The Supreme Court finally agreed, and in 1974, Section II of the act was struck down. This in effect opened the market to competition for all.

    Today, Penis Bird Industries is almost no more. Today we have the market leader Penis Bird Meat International facing against Penissoft, a recent startup. Where will the future lead the penis bird market? Only time will tell us, but one thing is certain: penis birds are here to stay!

    ( \
    X
    8====D

    -klerck

    1. Re:A Condensed History of the Penis Bird by Fucky+the+troll · · Score: -1

      Wow. I'd like to learn more about the Penis Bired, and the associated cult. Could you inform me of any way to find out more? A website perhaps? Thanks.

      --






      Roadkill is yummy.
  7. Linux changelog by Anonymous+Pancake · · Score: -1

    final:
    - Jan Kara: fix quota kill all hetero races with dildos

    pre9:
    - David Brownell: u must b gay update
    - Greg KH: USB and PCI assplug update
    - Ingo/me: fix SCHED_FUCKO for UP/SMP for good (flw).
    - Add back direct_BLOW now that it works again.

    pre8:
    - Richard Henderson: ass crust update
    - Andrew Morton: fix ext3/minix/sysv N'sync homosexual behaviour.

  8. So who else is downloading 2.5 by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 5, Funny

    so they can be cool and trendy and be on the development tree while it's still stable?

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by krorvik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thought about it, but then I realized that I would have to go *back* to 2.4.16 to keep on the stable side. So I'll just stick with 2.4.15 for now ;)

    2. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by entrigant · · Score: 1

      ME!! =D

    3. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by ddent · · Score: 1

      Funny you say that because thats *exactly* what I was thinking at the time. Hey, if I run 2.5.0, I can tell people I'm running the 2.5 branch. Heh.

    4. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by KjetilK · · Score: 1

      Me three! However, I failed to get it running. Can't get my network running. I have no idea what's going on, and I had two hackers working on it for me for two hours without getting anywhere. So, I'm back to 2.4.7-10 (came with RH7.2)

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    5. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I plan to, after I get home from work.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    6. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      *ahem* Ever heard of up2date?

    7. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      did you compile in netlink (and routing messages under that) that RH7.2 needs? It's under the networking menu - and if you search on Deja you can find that you need this for RH7.2 due to the way the ifup script now works.

    8. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by KjetilK · · Score: 1

      Jihaaaaa! It worked, thanks a lot! :-) I compiled in netlink, on the advice of my hacker friends, but they didn't think I would need routing messages. When I enabled that too, it worked!

      --
      Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    9. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      Glad I could help...this is the way /. used to be - discussions and helping people. Too many political based articles lately just pissing people off left and right!

    10. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by poundincludegeek · · Score: 1
      From the README:
      Linux-2.5.0 is exactly the same as 2.4.15, except for a version number change.
      So you could say you're being cool and trendy and using 2.5.0, although it doesn't really matter. I'm downloading it now!
    11. Re:So who else is downloading 2.5 by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Only problem is, 2.4.15 will eat your filesystem and burp loudly. You'd think it was a 2.5 kernel - oh wait, it is!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  9. Re:Belch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Oh, yeah, I forgot to mention, First Post!

  10. patch for XFree86 4.0.3 dri? by san · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Is there a way to use a new(er) kernel with XFree86 4.0.3 DRI? It seems my mb agpgart (VIA KT266) is not supported by 2.4.7 but it may be by 2.4.14.

    1. Re:patch for XFree86 4.0.3 dri? by LinuxGeek8 · · Score: 1

      You can use an ac kernel.
      Alan Cox has updated his dri modules in a way so you can still use XFree 4.0.3.

      --
      Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    2. Re:patch for XFree86 4.0.3 dri? by leine · · Score: 3, Informative

      Linus has a little package in the v2.4 directory. It is called drm-4.0.x.tar.gz. You can use it to get DRM for XFreee86 4.0.x.

    3. Re:patch for XFree86 4.0.3 dri? by webcrafter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So, finally Linux will incorporate Digital Rights Management?
      Interesting... it's GPL'd I suppose...
      However, is it possible to circumvent it by not using XFree? You seem to imply that

      (Note for the humor impaired: yeah I'm just joking. Go ahead and mod me offtopic, you know you need it! indulge yourself)

    4. Re:patch for XFree86 4.0.3 dri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Yahoo has this link which discusses the latest issues with XFree86 and the new kernel. All I can say is, be careful before you migrate a production machine over.

    5. Re:patch for XFree86 4.0.3 dri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      DON'T open the link in the above post if you value your lunch.

    6. Re:patch for XFree86 4.0.3 dri? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to find the patch by Robert Love for
      "Via vt8336"... it patches the agp.h file and some other files under drivers/char/agp/... and it is strange it hasn't entered the kernel yet.

      Then you should use the -ac kernel series for 4.0.3 drivers. If you have a Radeon card you should go for XFree 4.1.0 and standard linus/marcelo kernel.

      I thought I found it on http://www.linuxhq.com, even if now it says it is under reorganization

  11. Turkey! by iworm · · Score: 4, Funny

    Build 2.4.15 with some modules. Look where it installs them... (Clue: Think when it was released)

    Linus is a little joker, isn't he? ;-))

    1. Re:Turkey! by chabotc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Ps, if anyone else, like me, likes his /lib/modules tree without holidays that are not celibrated here in europe; or is a religious vegitarian, simply edit the toplevel Makefile and remove the 'extraversion' (-greased-turkey) from it. Then you will have a 'plain' 2.4.15 ;-)

    2. Re:Turkey! by webcrafter · · Score: 1

      Oh! you spoiled the fun for me!

    3. Re:Turkey! by imrdkl · · Score: 1
      Turkey-Day is a great tradition. I guess this is Linus' second or third one now, which means that he's also feeling anticipation leading up to the day. (at least if he's celebrating with a good cook) Otoh, if he spent the day making a release, maybe he ordered take out.

      I bet he still goes back home for Christmas, tho.

    4. Re:Turkey! by Martin+Maciaszek · · Score: 1

      or do as others suggested on lkml. Change it to:
      -tasteful-salad
      -sitting-duck
      or
      -speedful-penguin

    5. Re:Turkey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of kernel oddities, I was thinking about editing my own kernel source to include odd lines.
      boot messages are a good target: I already know what they're going to say (fine, if I update my hardware Ill go back to main-stream kernel) and it gives a great oppurtinity to make someone booting the machine thinking "did I really see that?"
      ("Sound blaster loaded. given severe spanking")
      I have other kernel messages on my target, too..
      So I now proclaim this to be the kernel-message-joke-thread. Feel free to post

      ("Power down"
      1 sec delay
      "No, wait, now it's down")

    6. Re:Turkey! by PM4RK5 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but its nice to see developers having fun with their work.

      Gobble, gobbble!

    7. Re:Turkey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>> if anyone else, like me, likes his /lib/modules tree without holidays that are
      >>> not celibrated here in europe; or is a religious vegitarian

      Ummm, I personally think that when Linux said 'Greased Turkey', he was talking about Bill Gates, not Thanksgiving... :-)

      And, sorry, but we Yanks have a lot to be thankful for, so please don't begrudge us our holidays, and we won't begrudge you yours. (BTW, it's 'Europe', with a capital 'E').

    8. Re:Turkey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Linus is a little joker, isn't he? ;-))

      Yes, he is. And I bet that our friends at MS will waste no time pointing out this kind of thing to businesses and asking them, "Do you want to bet your company's IT foundation on an OS written by people who do stupid things like this?"

      No, it's not a fair thing to do, but who said the computer business was fair? When you hand someone a stick that big, it makes little sense to complain or even be surprised when they hit you over the head with it.

    9. Re:Turkey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ye, well, is US with U and capital S? I thought so...So better when talk put it as us...so we know to whom we should address...bugger...

    10. Re:Turkey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... if only we could see the little snide comments abut competitors they include in THEIR code over there in Redmond. And all the immaturity.

  12. Preemptible kernel by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't forget the Preemptible Kernel patch. This will reduce latencies and overall make a desktop machine feel snappier.

    From what I hear, however, it's not recommended for servers where bandwidth is more important. But then again, you wouldn't be putting a bleeding edge kernel on there anyway, now would you?

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Preemptible kernel by chabotc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also, as we speak, the rml preempt patches for 2.4.15 have not yet been released, and the older ones (2.4.15-pre7) do not apply cleanly to the 2.4.15 tree. If you want to use that patch, wait a few hours/days. (they are very much worth using on a interactive desktop machine).

    2. Re:Preemptible kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There's some argument for it on servers too - On a lot of servers, it's not the absolute max throughput that matters, it's how quickly it give the appearance of responding to requests - it's often better if the users of a server can immediately connect and download at a few K a second, than if they can't connect in a reasonable time in the first place. - so, even on a server, latency can override throughput considerations.

    3. Re:Preemptible kernel by ukryule · · Score: 1

      So, this would be a version which when a new kernel is released, pauses all the low-priority task, upgrades the kernel, then happily continues?

      Kinda useful given the number of releases :-)

    4. Re:Preemptible kernel by WzDD · · Score: 1

      I'm interested in trying this, but I'm running XFS on my / - does anyone know about how well the patches work with XFS, if at all?

    5. Re:Preemptible kernel by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 1

      Actually, there was a thread or seven on the linux-kernel mailing list about this a couple months ago. However, it didn't go much of anywhere, as to upgrade a kernel on the fly would take some major code-fu (chucking variables into reserved spots in memory and hoping that you could keep track of them while you're running without a kernel)...

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
    6. Re:Preemptible kernel by Spoing · · Score: 2
      I like Robert M. Love's Preempt patch...I've used it for the past month and it works well. Unfortunately for me and some others there are two issues that will make it hard to add into the main kernel tree (maybe 2.5 as an option?);
      1. * Kernel modules that aren't SMP safe aren't preempt kernel safe.
      2. * Specifically, the binary part of the Alcatel/Thompson Speedtouch ADSL modems aren't SMP safe.

      There is probably nothing that RML can do anything about that. Alcatel needs to look into it, and consider releasing a fully open module, so that thier modems are better supported under Linux and other non-Linux OSs.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    7. Re:Preemptible kernel by mpe · · Score: 2

      From what I hear, however, it's not recommended for servers where bandwidth is more important. But then again, you wouldn't be putting a bleeding edge kernel on there anyway, now would you?

      It depends what kind of "server" is involved. Where one is mainly running interactive clients (or X terms) then such a patch might be very useful.
      But for a file server, web server (serving mostly static content), email server, web proxy, etc. You probably don't want to apply it.
      Hopefully soon this will become a compile option, rather than a patch.

    8. Re:Preemptible kernel by areguly · · Score: 2, Informative


      I use it flawlessy for a few weeks now. A few lines are pushed down in the source, but that doesn't hurd. I recommend it.

      I apply first xfs then preempt patch.

      --
      Alvaro
    9. Re:Preemptible kernel by evil_one · · Score: 2

      The preempt patch for pre9 applies cleanly to greased-turkey. I'm running it right now.
      Linux dwpws 2.4.15 #3 Fri Nov 23 07:49:28 EST 2001 i586 unknown

      --
      Desperation is a stinky cologne
    10. Re:Preemptible kernel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use bleeding edge kernels on my DEVELOPMENT servers all the time. In fact, I am compiling 2.4.15 for them right now...

    11. Re:Preemptible kernel by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      And what ha advertising ens if you have three versions: x, y, and z y has an extra variable in struct a from x z has an extra variable in struct a from x You upgrade from x -> z What happens?

    12. Re:Preemptible kernel by _Knots · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI, the patch *makes* it a compile option under "Processor Type and Features." It's a Y/N called "Preemptible Kernel."

      --_Knots

      --
      Anarchy$ dd if=/dev/random of=~/.signature bs=120 count=1
    13. Re:Preemptible kernel by pwagland · · Score: 2
      There is already a 2.4.15pre9 patch here. As always, please use the mirrors!

      This patch is not 100% clean, but the only reject is on an already patched file.

      patching file CREDITS Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch.
  13. Linus is SOOOooo unprofessional by barneyfoo · · Score: 3, Redundant

    Just look at the kernel name, for 2.4.15

    You'd think it would be 2.4.15, consistent with all other kernels.

    but NoooOOooo...

    he has to name it:

    2.4.15-greased-turkey

    1. Re:Linus is SOOOooo unprofessional by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Just edit the Makefile and remove "-greased-turkey" following EXTRAVERSION, if it bothers you. Can't miss it, it's the fourth line.

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
    2. Re:Linus is SOOOooo unprofessional by barneyfoo · · Score: 1

      Yes I know this. You couldn't detect the sarcasm?

    3. Re:Linus is SOOOooo unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he`s american? they have a big problem with jokes that dont aren`t labelled:

      /*
      Joke pending
      Dont take the next bit seriously - its just a
      bit of fun.
      */

      The door is a jar // this is the joke

      /*
      ok, i`m returning to being serious again.
      */

    4. Re:Linus is SOOOooo unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, moderators. This guy tries to be helpful and you mark him redundant. If you would've compared the timestamp on this and the other post, you'd see they were submitted at the same time. Hey, why wasn't the other one redundant instead? Lighten up.

    5. Re:Linus is SOOOooo unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, let us not forget the simple fact that Linus can name his kernel version however he wants ;)

    6. Re:Linus is SOOOooo unprofessional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess, to be prefessional in your opinion, He should have named it:
      1) Chicago
      2) Cairo
      3) Netscape Engineers are weenies

      Or perhaps, he should embed A Flight Sim in the Kernel, or perhaps, a NSA Security Patch, or perhaps as many security flaws as possible?
      That would make you happy. no?

  14. Todo list? by LinuxGeek8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm sure there isn't a Todo list. And I assume there never will be one.

    I was just wondering (read karma-whoring) what the first big change in 2.5.0 will be.
    I guess cml2, the new config/make system.

    Some other changes that might be expected;
    Jfs and Xfs in the main kernel,
    Fixing the latency, and maybe make the kernel pre-emptive.
    There will be a scsi layer rewrite and maybe a ide layer rewrite (that's correct?),

    --
    Well, don't worry about that. We can get you back before you leave. (Dr. Who)
    1. Re:Todo list? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 5, Informative
      Don't forget the possibilities of (in no particular order):
      • ALSA sound
      • MOSIX
      • BTTV2/V4L2
    2. Re:Todo list? by chabotc · · Score: 5, Informative
      To get a good feel for what the posible new cool things will be in the 2.5 kernel, check out the video / subscripts from the 2.5 kernel summit a while back. They mention

      Raw access to block devices (DB work)

      SCTP (nice network tricks)

      Block layer redesign (scsi, ide, etc)

      High performance file systems (xfs, jfs, etc)

      Re-worked network driver API

      Hot-Plug Devices (pci/pcmcia)

      Kernel build system

      Intergration of some NSA secure linux idea's (mandatory ACL's, etc)

      Async-IO addons (non posix conforment)

      ACPI / Power management (needed for hot plug?)
      And a lot of other topics. 'Specialy make sure to check out the video's. They provide some nice insights into the wo the file systems (xfs, etc), raw access to block devices (oracle was hot on this i think),rld of kernel hero's ;-)

      check out this link to the lwn article for more details, descriptions and links.

    3. Re:Todo list? by slittle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And what about the firewall code? I don't know about you guys, but I just love spending a large chunk of a weekend learning the new firewall every time a new kernel series arrives. It just wouldn't be the same if it didn't fsck up my firewall scripts...

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    4. Re:Todo list? by rasactive · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last I recall, there was an article on Slashdot where Linus described what he wanted in the 2.5 kernel. Some karma whore can post it, but I believe one of the goals was to eliminate human configuration, thus eliminating human error.
      But I could be wrong.

    5. Re:Todo list? by Joff_NZ · · Score: 1

      How hard would it be to set the kernel to be pre-emptable as a choice, when you're doing a "make menuconfig" or whatever... that way you could keep both the server and the desktop people happy....?

      --
      The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
    6. Re:Todo list? by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      raw access to block devices (oracle was hot on this i think)

      Our DBAs tell me that under the latest versions of Oracle, there is no performance increase on raw versus cooked partitions, and that it's therefore not worth the trouble anymore.

    7. Re:Todo list? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2

      Perhaps in your situation, but there are likely users for whom that is NOT the case.

      Think large enterprises which have huge databases. Oracle might know better about how to organize and access and cache the data than the OS does. The OS buffer could make things LESS efficient. Think read-ahead in situations where it is not appropriate.

      Sometimes you just need the OS to get out of the way.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    8. Re:Todo list? by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Perhaps in your situation, but there are likely users for whom that is NOT the case.

      Think large enterprises which have huge databases.


      Right, like us. These databases are multi-terabyte. There are only a hundred and change larger businesses than us in the world. We've got more IT employees than many large telecommunications firms, and more airplanes than all but one of the largest airlines in the world.

      I'm talking about FedEx, and the DBAs in question work on the largest projects in the company, including the one that does all the billing for FedEx Express.

      They're quite adamant about the performance of the latest Oracle on cooked vs. raw.

    9. Re:Todo list? by slamb · · Score: 2

      And what about the firewall code? I don't know about you guys, but I just love spending a large chunk of a weekend learning the new firewall every time a new kernel series arrives. It just wouldn't be the same if it didn't fsck up my firewall scripts...

      What are you talking about? You can still run 2.0.x ipfwadm stuff on the latest 2.4 kernel. Likewise 2.2.x ipchains stuff. iptables has backwards compatibility. If you want to use the newer interface, you can. No one's forcing you to.

      From linux-2.4.14/Documentation/Configure.help:

      pchains (2.2-style) support
      CONFIG_IP_NF_COMPAT_IPCHAINS
      This option places ipchains (with masquerading and redirection
      support) back into the kernel, using the new netfilter
      infrastructure. It is not recommended for new installations (see
      `Packet filtering'). With this enabled, you should be able to use
      the ipchains tool exactly as in 2.2 kernels.

      If you want to compile it as a module, say M here and read
      Documentation/modules.txt. If unsure, say `N'.

      ipfwadm (2.0-style) support
      CONFIG_IP_NF_COMPAT_IPFWADM
      This option places ipfwadm (with masquerading and redirection
      support) back into the kernel, using the new netfilter
      infrastructure. It is not recommended for new installations (see
      `Packet filtering'). With this enabled, you should be able to use
      the ipfwadm tool exactly as in 2.0 kernels.

      If you want to compile it as a module, say M here and read
      Documentation/modules.txt. If unsure, say `N'.

    10. Re:Todo list? by JLouder · · Score: 1

      Think large enterprises which have huge databases. Oracle might know better about how to organize and access and cache the data than the OS does. The OS buffer could make things LESS efficient. Think read-ahead in situations where it is not appropriate.

      I've seen numbers from a Sun engineer where mounting cooked partitions with the Solaris 'directio' option (which disables buffering) makes cooked Oracle partitions perform better than raw.

      Granted, that was Solaris, but it shows that raw partitions don't necessarily beat cooked partitions hands-down every time.

  15. Use the mirrors by jbondjr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Looks like kernel.org has updated their main page and their 100Mbps connection looks pretty maxed.

    http://www.kernel.org/mirrors/

    Sorry, seldom post, so don't know how to make a link on /. Also surprised my first submission got accepted :)

    1. Re:Use the mirrors by gazbo · · Score: 1
      Sorry, seldom post, so don't know how to make a link on /.

      Well...Kinda like you'd make a link anywhere really. So assuming you're not posting as code or extrans, I suggest you buy a book on html.
    2. Re:Use the mirrors by entrigant · · Score: 1

      Just use html

  16. Ive always by nervlord1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ive always loved the thrill of a development kernel, i bet linus is very excited, constant bug fixing does get quite annoying. But ive come to realise the ingenius nature of his development: odd and even numbers beeing stable and unstable respectively, its an ingenius little system, I know that 2.5 has some exciting developments like ALSA being our sound system in the works, but i wonder what else we can look forward to.
    Coincidently, does anyone remember the site that popped up when atlast 2.4 kernel was released and we got to predict when we thought 2.6 would come out, id like to see that site again to see what i predicted. Cheers

    --
    Microsoft IIS is to webserving as KFC is to healthy eating
    1. Re:Ive always by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's out there somewhere. Soon after 2.4 was out it got updated for 2.6 and reset. I think I voted for Q1 2002 hahahaha..

  17. ext3 by ma2tias · · Score: 5, Informative

    Now, for the people who use ext3:
    You will not need to download ac/ext3 patches anymore to get your journaling running.

    1. Re:ext3 by Cardhore · · Score: 2

      One thing worth mentioning, that it seems isn't well known, is that ext3 support journaling of the real data on the disc as well as the metadata. The other journalling filesystems only do metadata I think, so you might want to consider ext3 for filesystems where you have really critical data.

    2. Re:ext3 by josepha48 · · Score: 2
      in 2.4.15 you just can't umount your system. There is a workaround I found the other day.

      How to shutdown 2.4.15

      Bring your machine to init 1 on the command line. Make sure that there are no files in /var/lock and /tmp/.X11* if you are running X. Then umount -n /var and /tmp if you have them on seperate partitions. Then umount -n al other mount points. And then shutdown. This will help prevent the nasty fsck. However it is a real PIA.

      There should also be noted that there is a nasty bug in ECP in 2.4.14 adn 2.4.15 and 2.5.0 that may cause problems with devices that need ecp like webcams.

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!

  18. pre7: Taco-snot Linus by George+WIPO+Bush · · Score: -1

    THE OFFICIAL TACO-SNOTTING FAQ
    By The WIPO Troll, $Revision: 1.10 $

    What is "Taco-snotting?"

    "Taco-snotting" is a term used by one Rob "CmdrTaco" Malda, owner of the popular technology website Slashdot, to refer to the practice of sucking the penis of a homosexual man (or unwilling heterosexual; CmdrTaco doesn't care, and is rumored to actually prefer rape) and blowing the semen back out his nose onto his partner's (or victim's) face or body. Usually a long, bubbly stream of milky-white semen is left on CmdrTaco's face, dribbling out of his nose, down his cheek: hence the term, "Taco-snotting."

    Good Lord. And what is a "Circle-snot"?

    A "circle-snot" is a Taco-snotting circle-jerk, another practice common among homosexual geeks. This is when CmdrTaco, CowboiKneel, and Homos get together and Taco-snot each other repeatedly with their gooey, hot, and sticky cum -- spooging their dicks all over each other's faces and pasty-white bodies until they're all covered head to toe with man juice. Roblowme usually provides plenty of extra lubricant; he owns a limo service and has ample supplies of motor oil and axle grease.
    To complete this perverted orgy, fellow geeks Michael, Timothy, and Jamie often join in, dressed in black Gestapo uniforms, jack boots, and leather gloves. The whole group then proceeds to snot each other's spunk and whip each other's pudgy asses with riding crops and chains until their pasty-white geek bodies are sweaty and exhausted from all the passionate, homosexual revelry.

    Ewwwww. Why have I been receiving emails from CmdrTaco asking me if he can Taco-snot me?

    I'm guessing you've received an email similar to the following:
    From: malda@slashdot.org
    To: wipotroll@hotmail.com
    Subject: Hey, baby - jion me in a taco-snott! :)

    Hey, baby!

    Ever done a taco-snotting with anothar fellow geek? Its more fun then trolling Slashdot, trust me! all that talk you troll with about homasexual incest and stuff got me all horny and hot for you! Is it serius? Please tell me that itt is! If you want to get with me and my Slashdot bois, drop me an emale!

    ps- Please replie to me at horny_rob_6969@hotmail.com. I'd rather the guys at VA Linux are not seen this. :) :)

    --
    CmdrTaco (malda@slashdot.org)
    You most likely forgot to uncheck the "Willing to Taco-snot" checkbox in your account preferences. Whenever CmdrTaco gets bored (and who wouldn't, running a site like Slashdot all day), he roams through the Slashdot database, penis in hand, looking for people who might enjoy being Taco-snotted. How he determines this is anyone's guess; but if you have a homosexual-sounding nickname, you're in trouble. So this time, he found you. Lucky you.
    CmdrTaco has probably already got the hots for your wad, and he's probably already been lurking outside your bathroom window for weeks with a camera, some tissues and lube. There's no escaping a geek in heat, so it's probably too late for you, but you can possibly rectify this situation. To remove yourself from CmdrTaco's sights, log into your Slashdot account, go to your user page, click on Messages, and uncheck the box next to "Willing to Taco-snot." Maybe he'll ignore you. Probably not.

    I can't stop receiving these emails from CmdrTaco!?

    Probably not. If you indulge him in a Taco-snot or two, he might leave you alone. You might also want to look into mail filtering, restraining orders, or purchasing a heavy, blunt object capable of warding off rampaging homosexual geeks in heat. Trust me, when they charge... oh, the humanity. If he gets you, and you let him Taco-snot you, he might end up tying you up in his basement to use you as his sex slave for the rest of your life (or until he accidentally drowns you in spunk in a circle-snot).

    Have you ever been Taco-Snotted?

    Unfortunately, yes. I first met CmdrTaco at an Open Source Convention. He invited me back to his room for a game of Quake, but when I got to there, he jumped me and tied me to his bed, stripping me. After taking his "Commander" out of his pants, Mr. Taco made me suck the withered, little thing several times. He then performed his vile Taco-snotting ritual on me three times over the next two hours, bringing me to orgasm after sweaty, mind-numbing orgasm... then he snotted my own milky-white jizz back onto my face, into my mouth, then again on my exposed belly.
    CmdrTaco invited several of his Open Source (or rather, "Open Sauce" -- man sauce) buddies over to continue the twisted snotfest. Linux Torvalds raped my ass with his "monolithic kernel," and Anal Cox used his "network stack" in a multitude of unspeakable ways on and in every orifice in my defenseless body.
    How did you finally escape, you ask? After about 16 hours of countless homosexual atrocities perpetrated against my restrained body, they all finally went to sleep on top of me, sweat-soaked and exhausted. I was left there, covered in bubbly, translucent jizz-snot, chained to the bed, with half a dozen fat, pasty-white fags lying around and on top of me. Fortunately the spooge coating my flesh worked wonderfully as a lubricant; I was able to squirm my way out of the handcuffs and slip out the back door. I'm just glad I survived the ordeal. These geeks had a lot of built-up spunk in their wads -- I could've easily been drowned!

    That's horrible. Does "Taco-snotting" have anything to do with CmdrTaco's "special taco"?

    No, that's a different disgusting perversion CmdrTaco indulges himself in. CmdrTaco is usually not satisfied with merely snotting your own jizz back onto your face, he most often enjoys involving his own bodily fluids in his twisted games. WeatherTroll has spent some time trying to educate the Slashdot readership about this vile practice (emphasis added):
    You may be wondering what CmdrTaco's "special taco" is. You will be wishing that you hadn't been wondering after you finish reading this post. To make his "special taco", CmdrTaco takes a taco shell and shits on it. He then adds lettuce, jacks off on the taco, and adds a compound to make the person who eats the taco unconscious. Of course, the compound does not make the person unconscious until the taco is fully eaten. Thus CmdrTaco force-feeds the taco to the unsuspecting victim.
    After the victim is unconscious, he is held against his will and used for CmdrTaco's nefarious sexual purposes. This includes shoving taco shells up the victim's ass, Taco-snotting, and getting Jon Katz involved.
    Completely different, yet no less revolting. It should be clear to you now that CmdrTaco is a very, very sick individual, as are most of the Slashdot editors.

    Does Jon Katz get involved in any of this? I thought he was a paedophile, not a homosexual.

    Actually, Jon Katz is a homosexual paedophile. He's also a coprophiliac, and, many suspect, a zoophile. Jon Katz is somewhat of a loner and doesn't involve himself in circle-snots. Mr. Katz usually engages in a game called " Katz juicy-douching" with his harem of little-boy slaves: a vile practice which involves administering an enema to himself of the little boy's urine (forced out of them with a pair of pliers), spooging the vile muck from his ass back into the enema bag, then squirting and slathering the goo all over himself, and the little boy's chained-up and naked bodies. If he's in the mood, he will sometimes skip refilling the enema bag and just squirt it from his ass onto his boys. Unwilling boys are further tortured with the pliers until they comply and allow Mr. Katz to juicy-douche them for the rest of their lives.
    As I already said, Mr. Katz is also a zoophile. As if the sexual escapades with the helpless little boys aren't enough, Jon usually enjoys his juicy-douches best when his penis is firmly planted in a female goat's anus. He is also rumoured to get off on watching his little boys eat the goat's small, bean-like turds.

    ...Are you getting hard writing this?

    Why, yes. :) Join me in a WIPO-snot? I promise I won't try and rape you or kidnap you and make you my sex slave or anything. I'm not like CmdrTaco or Mr. Katz; I only enjoy snotting on willing partners.

    What's that screaming I hear coming from your basement?

    Oh, that's just my little sister; I got her chained up down there. In fact, I just finished snotting all over her body. You should see her squirm when I spooge on her belly, lick it up, and snot it all over her face! She's such a feisty little 14 year-old bitch. Of course she's my sex slave, she's my sister. What else would she be good for? So, join me in a WIPO-snot?

    No, thanks. I'm already CmdrTaco's boi toi.

    ________________________________________
    READER COMMENTS

    1. Re:Microsoft's Taco-Snotting Connection (Score:-1, Troll)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.21 4:49 (#2594325)

      oh yeah, you say you have masturbated only 2 times to this post. well, by the time it takes for me to get through reading it, i usually end up masturbated 5 to 6 times, 10 to 12 if i have the goatse.cx homepage loaded up and am looking at it side by side with the slashdot page. my keyboard, hands, mouse, monitor, the underside of my desk and around the floor under my desk are cum soaked and sticky with the man smell i know and love.

    2. Re:Microsoft's Taco-Snotting Connection (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.21 4:41 (#2594311)

      for version 2 you should make a total re-write of the cod...errr...text and add some details about cmdrtaco and the homo-gang's happenings with their coworkers (osdn?) and all of the gay revelry they enjoy and promote. by the way, did i just see cmdrtaco on television promoting the nax hair removal system? i guess after using vaseline in and around his ass he grew quite a ponytail and it had to be removed somehow...ouch!

    3. Re:Microsoft's Taco-Snotting Connection (Score:-1, Troll)
      by TRoLLaXoR on 2001.11.21 3:59 (#2594191)

      WIPO, do you notice how few comments you get for anything you write/post/spam nowadays?

      -Trollaxor

    4. Jon-Katz docking (Score:-1)
      by sales_worldwide on 2001.11.20 11:53 (#2588488)

      You forgot to mention Jon Katz's "docking" games, where he places his chopper head to head with another chap, and rolls the other guys foreskin over his own circumcised end ("docking"), providing him with fantasies of actually having his own forskin ...
      "Making linux GPL was the best thing I ever did" - Torvalds. I'd hate to see the worst thing...

    5. Re:Snotting a first! (Score:-1)
      by Fucky the troll on 2001.11.20 11:28 (#2588446)

      Woah! When did the WIPO troll get freed? And how the fuck did I miss it?

      Excellent FP, sir.

      This is a sig virus. Please put me in your sig

    6. Re:Snotting a first! (Score:-1, Troll)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.20 11:04 (#2588407)

      omg that is crapflooding material if i ever saw it!!!!!! and u got a first post!!!! whoot to the wipo troll!!!

    7. GW, please.... (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.19 9:03 (#2583756)

      GW...you know we love every hair on your 27 acre ass... and I, for one, would never do anything untowards your graceful demeanor. And you probably have several friends that would love to help you do the bear dance all over my face if I so much as spelled your name wrong. And you know I'd defend your Constitutional right to defame God in heaven. I'd even help fund your education, should you ever decide to take that route. Hell, I'd buy you a tall tepid bear-whiz beer if you were here with me, right now!

      But. ...if you can't find another topic, I'm gonna step over your dead mother's grave and kick your assuredly anesthetitized butt clear across the playground.

      Now go stick your shaved head back down inside the woman's toilet, and just to show there's no hard feelings, I'll jump in the tow-truck and drive right over to help you pull it right out...ok?

      thanks

    8. Re:Help me Taco-Snotters!! (Score:-1)
      by mark knopfler 69 on 2001.11.19 8:25 (#2583695)

      I DO NOT BELIEVE YOU SIR. FOR ONE THING, THE E-MAIL FROM CMDRTACO DOES NOT HAVE ENOUGH GRAMMATICAL AND SPELLING MISTAKES. Let's be realistic here, CmdrTaco usually types with one hand, and since he is shaking from jacking off his aim on the keyboard isn't too good. Those e-mails were a little too well written. Sorry boy, you'll have to do better.

    9. Re: What the hell is "taco snotting"? (Score:-1)
      by WeatherTroll on 2001.11.19 8:14 (#2583667)

      You should update this to say VA Software instead of VA Linux.

    10. YOU ARE WINNER (Score:1)
      by smackmonkey on 2001.11.19 7:06 (#2583510)

      Crackhead moderators: this is +5, Hilarious material.

      --
      CNN declares War on Islam!
      Left-wing America declares War on its Civil Liberties!

    11. Re:On Taco-Snotting 1.9 (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.19 5:40 (#2583336)

      This was funny the first 100 times. Now it is getting boring!

    12. Digusting and Shameful (Score:-1)
      by egg troll on 2001.11.18 22:27 (#2582054)

      Having masturbated *twice* to this post, I'm still incredibly aroused! Come over for a Taco Snot. I'll be wearing my crotchless Clifford the Big Red Dog outfit!!

      For more info check out this /. article

    13. IMPROVE THE FAQ (Score:-1, Flamebait)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.18 12:03 (#2580822)

      add more links to goatse and to cowboineal's site to make it better. a link to rotten.com would be nice too

      • Re:IMPROVE THE FAQ (Score:0)
        by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.18 12:18 (#2580832)

        and a link to michael's site and to jon katz's site if he has one and homo's site. i dont know what else to say. maybe a few links to phallic.org they have nice penis pictures! a link to the planet quake site or whatever. really make the reader feel this faq really answers their questions. oh yeah, and when you talk about cmdrtaco snotting you, say he brought you to "orgasm after sweaty orgasm". describe it more is all i'm saying. and use more italics and bolding! and when you talk about jon katz shitting or whatever have a link to fecal japan on rotten.com

        other wise a great job wipo troll! keep up the good work!

    14. Re:CmdrTaco's filthy secret! (Score:-1)
      by Wil Wheaton on 2001.11.18 6:41 (#2580438)

      Hi. Let's be buddies.. butt buddies.
      --
      WIL WHEATON DOT NET

    15. WIPO speaks the truth (Score:-1)
      by dead_puppy on 2001.11.18 5:33 (#2580342)

      Here is an e-mail I received a week ago:

      From: malda@slashdot.org
      To: puppy_dead@hotmail.com
      Subject: were where you last friday? :(

      I thought we where supposed to meet at Backdoor's at 8-ish, sugar-lips? You could've at least told me that you could'nt make it! I was even in my favorite pink skirt for you, honey-cup... next time, you could be more considarite and tell me you cant come... bastard.

      --
      CmdrTaco (malda@slashdot.org)

      You finding Ling-Ling's head?

    16. Taco snotting is WRONG!!! (Score:-1)
      by Big_Ass_Spork on 2001.11.18 4:53 (#2580300)

      I do it wrong

      Laying here in the shadows of my room, I squint up at my love. My Ms. Portman. I am sore and tired after fucking her for eight solid hours. My chapped and aching dick is soaking in grits to relieve the pain. She gets on her knees and starts lapping the grits up out of the bowl. She places her beautiful hands on my penis and starts to lick the grits off my achy piece.

      Massaging my nutsack she....

      WAIT, I DO IT WRONG!!!!

      Yanking my dick out of her mouth I throw her to the ground and shove it in to her gaping freshly fisted ass. [goatse.cx]

      "OH BIG ASS SPORK!! Fuck my ass, fuck my ass good. DEEPER, my stallion, deeper!! Make a Beowulf cluster of sperm on my back!!"

      "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of this baby!"

      I DO IT WRONG!!!!

      ---
      All your Sporks are belong to Big_Ass_Spork! What you say?! All your Sporks are belo... forget it...

    17. Rob Malda Dead at age 25! (Score:-1)
      by j0nkatz on 2001.11.17 22:54 (#2579596)

      I just heard some sad news on the radio -- famous queerbait Rob Malda was found dead in his Holland home this morning. The details were a bit hazy, but it seems that he drowned in jizz while Taco Snotting his friend Hemos. I'm sure everyone in the /. community will miss him -- even if you didn't enjoy his queer antics and boring ass website, there's no denying his contributions to the homosesual cultural development, particularly in the areas of Taco snotting. Truly an American icon.

      I wanna Open Source sex so it won't be worth a shit either.

    18. TACO-SNOTTING is really Donkey-Punching (Score:-1, Troll)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.15 6:38 (#2567601)

      No no no, the correct term for that is "donkey-punch". I have eye-witnessed this amazing eye-popping event demonstrated on unsuspecting hose-monsters by my frat brothers in the past.. . :-)

    19. Re:the effect of knowlege laws... (Score:1)
      by AbsoluteRelativity on 2001.11.15 5:31 (#2567457)

      The WIPO Troll
      Slashdot and the Karma Lottery - News for uber monkeys, by uber monkeys.

    20. Re:Taco-Snotting (Score:-1, Troll)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.13 9:27 (#2557632)

      Oh, man that's just sick !

    21. HOW DO I GET AN ANONYMOUS PROXY? (Score:-1, Troll)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.13 9:03 (#2557604)

      TELL ME WHERE I CAN GET AN ANONYMOUS proxy please WIPO Troll. Maybe later i will join you in a snotting at my place. ;P

    22. Re:Taco-Snottage!?!?!? (Score:-1, Offtopic)
      by vikool on 2001.11.13 7:43 (#2557495)

      what is this bull shit,i feel offened that some people feel so so senseless to post stuff like these esp when such a tragic incident has occured

    23. Re:Taco-felching!! (Score:-1)
      by I.T.R.A.R.K. on 2001.11.11 22:38 (#2551890)

      Where the fuck do I sign up?!

      - I throw rocks at retarded kids

      "Adequacy.org: Where congenital stupidity is not an option, but a requirement."

    24. Re:Taco-felching!! (Score:-1, Troll)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.11 21:53 (#2551753)

      this shit is hilarious..keep up the good work.

    25. Re:Taco-felching!! (Score:-1, Offtopic)
      by rockwood on 2001.11.11 21:49 (#2551746)

      OMG! That is the most disgusting thing I have ever heard! WHo in their right mind would sit down and waste the time to construct such a replusive story. I guess I'll be skipping lunch and dinner today.. and possibly tomorrow also. The game doesn't affect reality. Reality affects the game.

    26. Re:Ban this! It's disgusting!! (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.11 14:43 (#2550701)

      dude, this is crap-flood material if i ever saw it.
      duuuuuuuuudddddddddddddeeeeeeeee.

    27. Re:Taco-Snotting = HATE SPEECH (Score:-1, Flamebait)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.11 8:16 (#2550266)

      horny_rob_6969@hotmail.com

      Ah, so that's what the alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.horny-rob newsgroup is about!

    28. MOD THIS UP PLEASE!!! (Score:-1)
      by egg troll on 2001.11.11 5:34 (#2550024)

      +5, Arousing

      For more info check out this /. article

    29. Re:Taco-Snotting = HATE SPEECH (Score:-1, Offtopic)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.11 4:39 (#2549891)

      WINNER>

    30. Re:Taco-Snotting = HATE SPEECH (Score:-1, Offtopic)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.11 4:37 (#2549887)

      I love you. Why do you use your bitchslapped account, rather than signing up for a new account to post at +1 before getting bitchslapped by the censors here? I guess I should speak for myself, but I don't want to log out and lose all my slashdot customization properties, nor do I want to lose my 50 karma yet.

    31. Re:On Taco-Snotting (Score:0)
      by Anonymous Coward on 2001.11.09 9:19 (#2542412)

      you fucking rock! right down to the expanded cvs id!

      WIPO trolls > linux

    ________________________________________

    $Id: tacosnotting.html,v 1.10 2001/11/21 05:16:58 wipo Exp $
    --

    J. Wipo Troll, Esq.
    Crapflooder Associates
    Slashdot.org

  19. Damn! by zloppy303 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Damn! I just got 2.4.14 to compile using a part of the 2.4.15pre patch.

    I could have had some decent sleep! :)

    --
    Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein
  20. Warning: it has back doors !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    My boyfriend had been going on at me for a long time about wanting anal sex with me. Initially I was quite shocked, but perhaps not surprised as he had gone to a well known public school, and I knew what they got up to!

    I started to look up websites and read articles about anal sex on the Internet, and I was surprised how interesting I found the subject - I was even intrigued that the Americans call the women 'back door girls'.

    One evening, after a few too many glasses of wine, I said that I would agree to it, on the condition that if it hurt or I did not like it he would stop immediately. My boyfriend is very considerate and he fully agreed to my demands. I said that I would have a bath, and see him in the bedroom.

    I made sure that I carefully scrubbed my bottom in readiness, and with some trepidation walked into the bedroom. My boyfriend did nothing to hide his erection and he said that he was getting really excited at the prospect of taking me from the rear. He gave me a long and passionate kiss, his tongue probing deep into my mouth. He then cupped my breasts and started to lick and suck my nipples, which made them stand out like stalks. I could feel the moisture starting to flow from my pussy. He then got me to kneel on the carpet with my bottom sticking straight up at him. I am rather proud of my bottom, and he praised its plump roundness.

    His tongue started to lick up and down my crack, I could feel his saliva dribbling down over my gaping pussy lips. My hand went to seek out my clit, and I rubbed it hard. Then he eased his cock to my puckered little hole, and ever so gently pushed it in. I let out a gasp, and tried to relax my muscles he slid further inside me. It was an incredible sensation, feeling his stiff cock gliding in and out of my bottom as my finger masturbated my clit.

    Soon he cried out that he was going to cum, and my hand was in a frenzy rubbing my swollen bud, as I too felt my orgasm start. He groaned as with a final thrust up my bottom he spurted his delicious hot cream deep inside me. That was enough to send me over the top and I came with a violent shuddering spasm.

    As a thank you to me, he gave my juicy pussy a good licking, and I had another lovely orgasm. I am now a fully paid up 'back door girl'!

  21. Kbuild sorted in 2.5 I hope !! by johnjones · · Score: 2

    I hope that all the kbuild stuff gets in soon !!!

    regards

    john jones

  22. Raping the Olsen Twins by George+WIPO+Bush · · Score: -1

    I have a confession to make.

    Last night, I raped and sodomized Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen. I couldn't help it, they're just so darling cute when they're naked, chained to each other, and begging me not to plunge my penis into their puckered little asses. But I did. Seventeen times.

    And I like licking their cute little feet.

    --

    J. Wipo Troll, Esq.
    Crapflooder Associates
    Slashdot.org

  23. It will happen again? by bockman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My impression, as a linux user, is that with 2.4 we (well...they) have moved to a three stage development cycle:
    • alpha : the development tree
    • beta : developers realise that they have done all the tests they could and call 'stable' the development tree. More users starts using the new kernel (users which would not have used a 'development' release). New bug and problems come out; some of them may not be fixable with small patches, but may require some strong re-enginering.
    • final : the developers and beta users are satisfied with the current performances of the stable kernel ( and maybe also tired of working on it ;^>). The stable kernel is given to the maitainers. A new development kernel begins.
    This is not a bad model. Maybe the kernel is getting too big for the two-stage model. And maybe too many people are using Linux for critical business, starving the 'development' releases of the testers it needs to get production quality.
    --
    Ciao

    ----

    FB

    1. Re:It will happen again? by nyseal · · Score: 1

      Or....maybe just don't trust it enough.

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
  24. Take a break, coders! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    Linux coders, we really appreciate your hard work! Take a break, enjoy some lighter material!

  25. fast development by carpe_noctem · · Score: 1

    Dammit! I just downloaded 2.4.14 and recompiled not more than a few days ago, and time to do the same thing all again. Seems like the kernels are coming out faster than one can keep up with them. =)

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
    1. Re:fast development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had followed the kernel development, you wouldn't have upgraded to 2.4.14 in the first place. 2.4.15 was expected "Real Soon Now" and it would merge the Alan fixes, be handed over to the new maintainer, and last but not least, be Really Really Stable.

      Look at the changelogs. I think seeing all those fixes and an entry that says "Alan Cox: final merges" (not to mention that the -ac tree has haulted) is well enough to warrant saying, "I think I'll wait for this."

    2. Re:fast development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>Seems like the kernels are coming out faster than one can keep up with them.

      If you think that's bad, try keeping up with the security patches for Microsoft's so-called "operating systems". :-)

    3. Re:fast development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should use SGL instead.....

  26. how to make a link Re:Use the mirrors by leuk_he · · Score: 2, Informative

    just code html to make a link. you should type:

    <a href="http://www.kernel.org/mirrors/">http://www.k ernel.org/mirrors/</a>

    This works in html formatted <B> and </B> plain old text. (i think code as well).

    just a tip.

  27. Stable or not? by doorbot.com · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since the kernel is now on the 2.4 series kernel, is it officially considered a "stable" kernel yet? With the recent discussions of the VM system and pre-emptable kernels, I wonder if the latest version is stable enough for my server. I'm still running 2.2.19 and it's working fine, but I'm looking forward to upgrading some time in the next couple weeks (maybe).

    One big thing I'm looking for a fix for (hopefully with the 2.4.x series) is for the SNMP/netstat info to use more than 32 bit integers to store the number of bytes transferred. Mine keeps resetting after 4 GB transferred and over 6 months that would've added up, but right now it resets itself back to zero after it hits the 4 billion byte limit.

    Also, the SMP is supposed to be better, but will that really make a difference on a server which does mild web serving, other miscellaneous duties, and who's primary purpose is serving Unreal Tournament games? As of now, it doesn't look like UT takes advantage of both processors, it just uses one...

    1. Re:Stable or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SMP will help somewhat, in that it would free up one CPU for use entirely by UT, while other tasks could run on the second.

    2. Re:Stable or not? by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Stable is totally relative. The 2.2.x tree has had a lot longer to mature. It'll probably be a year before 2.4.x is as solid. This is true with most operating systems. If you have a mission critical server that's been working flawlessly on 2.2.x, then you have no reason to upgrade to 2.4.x. Since the old series is still maintained with security fixes, you can stay with the old kernel for a long time.

      On the other hand, if you're installing a new machine you might benefit from some of the 2.4.x features. As long as the machine isn't really critical, you might as well go for it. If you're starting a project that won't be deployed for another six months or so, then 2.4.x is definately the way to go. Likewise on a desktop machine.

      In your particular case, you need to evaluate how stable your Unreal Tournament server needs to be. Will you go out of business if it crashes? If not then I'd go ahead and upgrade. Chances are it'll be rock solid, and if not you can always go back.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    3. Re:Stable or not? by anpe · · Score: 1

      IIRC, SNMP integers are coded in ASN.1 standard, I wonder if your 4 bytes limitation doesn't come from the SNMP protocol itself ...

    4. Re:Stable or not? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2
      snmpv2c and v3 (most people just use v2c) DOES support counter64.

      I suspect its the kernel that's only keeping the 'ifconfig' counters to 32bits. the ucd-snmp pkg (the most popular) supports 64bit counters for the o/s's that have real native support for that.

      being an snmp guy myself, I'll take a look at this. if, in fact, the linux kernel DOES support 64bit ifconfig counters, then its trivial to wrap that support back into the ucd pkg.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    5. Re:Stable or not? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      The stable version is right here . You never have to worry about poor, unplanned, and non cvs development with this one.

    6. Re:Stable or not? by yem · · Score: 1

      IMHO its stable. I've used 2.4 exclusively since 2.4.0 at home and since 2.4.4 (WITH AC PATCHES) on servers. Have had absolutely ZERO problems.

      File servers, web servers, database servers, firewalls, you name it. I have *not* used the plain unpatched "linus" kernels much at all so I can't speak to the stability/performance of those. The -ac ones are good though.

      I'm on 2.4.13-ac7 right now (the last of the stable -ac kernels). I might stick with this for a wee while.

      I will *not* be using 2.4.15+ on any servers until some serious time/testing has taken place.

      --
      No, I did not read the f***ing article!
    7. Re:Stable or not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So run two separate UT server processes on different ports!

  28. hard packed versions by ma2tias · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The readme file in 2.5.0 says:

    Linux-2.5.0 is exactly the same as 2.4.15,
    except for a version number change.
    Subsequent releases diverge, with Marcelo Tosatti
    maintaining the stable 2.4.x kernels, while the 2.5.x kernels are for development work.

    and looking at the filesizes we find what we expect that

    linux-2.5.0.tar. takes up 129 699 840 bytes
    linux-2.4.15.tar takes up 129 699 840 bytes

    are the same. But if we look at the packed versions

    linux-2.5.0.tar.bz2 23 748 963
    linux-2.4.15.tar.bz2 23 747 061

    A difference of 1902 bytes

    linux-2.5.0.tar.gz 29 404 635
    linux-2.4.15.tar.gz 29 404 736

    A difference of -101 bytes

    How come?

    1. Re:hard packed versions by Cow4263 · · Score: 1

      I'd assume the difference lies within the only difference.. the file name. 15 is more then 0 so there would be a slight increase in the 4 series kernel.

      Just a thought...

    2. Re:hard packed versions by iworm · · Score: 1

      Maybe they backed out the Greased Turkey patch for 2.5.0?? Dunno, haven't looked. (Or maybe 2.5.0 should be Cold Turkey?)

    3. Re:hard packed versions by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      gzip and bzip2 compression isn't completely deterministic, different implementations of the algoritm, or command options can yield more or less different (but correct) output.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    4. Re:hard packed versions by w00d00 · · Score: 2, Informative

      since the name is different, the overall entropy is different. IMHO the packaged size then depends on the algorithm..
      just my .02

    5. Re:hard packed versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They most certainly *are* deterministic; compress the same file with bzip2 or gzip and you'll get the same file every time. Of course, using different versions of gzip/bzip2 might not necessarily give you the same file; that's not being undeterministic, it's just the natural result of changes in the code.

    6. Re:hard packed versions by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      Well, "not deterministic" may not be the best way of putting it, what I meant is that the format itself isn't so strict that the same input always has to result in the same output.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    7. Re:hard packed versions by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      a: the subversion joke in 2.4.15 b: compression is very picky. A change of one byte makes a big difference.

    8. Re:hard packed versions by jquirke · · Score: 0

      What a shame there isn't a way to properly moderate those who ask stupid questions.

  29. Re:Belch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That chick that keeps showing up in the Speigel ads on iWon drives me nuts. She ain't all that good looking, but damn I want to nail her every time I see her picture.

  30. Re:Belch... by Fucky+the+troll · · Score: -1

    Save these pictures and post the links, for the good of all the people here. Except Taco.

    --






    Roadkill is yummy.
  31. Upgrade by vidarlo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Damn. Downloaded 2.4.14 over a 56K link yesterday... Well.Patches suck but..
    I suppose we realy need all those new kernels on 2 year old pcs?
    Most normal pcs don't need this at all.
    Unless you're a freak

  32. Re:how to make a link by jbondjr · · Score: 1

    Thanx. I just didn't think it was so HTML, so I was thinking there must be some escape keys or something.

  33. Informative by beable · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is a new technique called "Don't Click On The Link Of Stories You Don't Want To Read". Apparently it allows people to decide whether they want to read the story just by looking at the headline, and if it says "New Linux Kernel Out", it allows the user to not click the link, thus avoiding the story they didn't want to read. I can't see how this new-fangled "Don't Click The Link" technology could possibly work, but some people say they are very happy with it.

    So... has anybody found any bugs on 2.4.15 yet?

    --
    ...
    1. Re:Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a patent on that?

    2. Re:Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is english humor?

    3. Re:Informative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.... you can tell because it's actually funny.

    4. Re:Informative by Johnny+Vector · · Score: 1
      There is a new technique called "Don't Click On The Link Of Stories You Don't Want To Read".

      Well okay, but see I wacky-parsed the headline as

      Linux 2.4.15 is out; Ringo's in

      So naturally I clicked on it.

    5. Re:Informative by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      'Wacky-parsed'? What's that?

    6. Re:Informative by UtilMan · · Score: 1

      Didn't Amazon patent this "Dont Click The Link" technology?

    7. Re:Informative by jumpfroggy · · Score: 1

      Is this patented? *hmm*

  34. Re:Belch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ad and Here's the link to the original on the Speigel site.

  35. At last by javajerk · · Score: 1

    Must have been a week since I installed 2.4.14 - to long a time :) This will be a nice weekend, I guess.

    What I really want to know: how is ext3 doing? And why is Alan still patching .13?

    Hmm, hopefully will be able to leave work early this evening...

    Cheers, Lars

    1. Re:At last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ext3 is in 2.4.15, and Alan has merged everything considered he considered stable with into that tree as well.

      I don't think he plans on doing the -ac patches anymore, at least not the way he used to.

  36. Request for 2.5.x by redcliffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I want support for ATAPI/IDE CD Burners. The SCSI emulation solution isn't the best solution I don't think. That's the extent of my wishlist. I'll be happy with whatever else Linus gives us in his infinite wisdom. Anyone else got a wishlist for 2.5.x?

    1. Re:Request for 2.5.x by Doug+Neal · · Score: 0

      ATAPI is SCSI emulation. ATAPI is, essentially, the SCSI protocol over the IDE bus - Windows has the same kind of thing with it's ASPI layer which is used on SCSI and IDE drives. Linux's SCSI emulation is the perfect solution because programs such as cdrecord don't need to worry about whether the drive is SCSI or IDE, because they can speak the same language to any of them. cdrecord should work with your IDE CD burner unless you've got a particularly wierd one... but I always like to check Linux compatibility before buying new kit anyway...

    2. Re:Request for 2.5.x by chabotc · · Score: 2

      Actualy, it would be quite simple to support ATAPI burners (since ATAPI is already supported). However the downside is in the userspace code. Most of the populair tools (read: cdrdao and cdrecord) are written with scsi interfaces in mind.. adding IDE writer support to those would be a lot more time consuming.

      So scratch that of your linux 2.5.x wishlist, and put it on your cdrecord TODO list ;-)

    3. Re:Request for 2.5.x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, my wish is that it will stop dying whenever my machine starts to use swap heavily. That'd be a big plus for me. :/

  37. ALSA Re:Todo list? by Laven · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does anyone know the reason why they haven't included ALSA in the main kernel yet?

    I finally switched my Red Hat 7.2 and recompiled KDE with Alsa support, and things are SO MUCH nicer than free-OSS. I can finally use Real Player or Quicktime Player (via CrossOver) seemlessly with KDE. No more fussing with artsdsp to get Real Player to work, or terminate artsd in order for Wine audio to play.

    1. Re:ALSA Re:Todo list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beats the fuck outta me. I am so tired of this.. every time I upgrade my kernel, I can't hear anything. Then I remember: oh yeah, I have to reinstall alsa.

    2. Re:ALSA Re:Todo list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not have full OSS compatibility yet. The last time I tried it, the sound on my SB Live was full of static (the music played, but the quality sucked). A bug report had already existed for a while, and a year later, nobody had even tried to fix it. And recently Vorbis has had ALSA problems, because ALSA and OSS implemented the same function in different ways (something to do with blocking/non-blocking access to /dev/audio).

    3. Re:ALSA Re:Todo list? by J4 · · Score: 1

      I'm using the unstable version of ALSA with a SBLive and it sounds good. On some machines raising the value latency timer value (which I haven't had to do here) will get rid of the crackling.

    4. Re:ALSA Re:Todo list? by Laven · · Score: 1

      OSS used to crackle horribly on both my SB Live and integrated AC97 audio chip. I installed the latest ALSA beta and it works very cleanly now. It works for me.

  38. Stability by sydb · · Score: 2

    It's probably stable.

    But why take my word for it (or anyone else's) - download, compile, install, stress test, use.

    If you don't have a test machine - wait a while, read the mailing list, see if anyone reports bad uptime / errors which affect you.

    If you're so worried about stability, I don't see any other real option for you. Certainly, it seems naive to consider an 'official' designation of 'stable' sufficient to jump in with both feet. Either test it yourself, or read other peoples reports - there's plenty of them.

    My experience? I have had no trouble with the 2.4 series, except for VM probs in 2.4.9 which brought my desktop machine to a short lived pause once or twice. I installed 2.4.13 last night and am hoping Andrea's VM will cure this.

    --
    Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  39. Loopback device fixed..and new pcmcia-cs 3.1.29 by buserror · · Score: 2, Informative

    For some reason I couldn't get the loopback block device module building in 2.4.14 on my laptop (depmod chocked on undefined symbols)

    works again in 2.4.15

    There is also a new (at last! almost 4 months since .29) 3.1.30 pcmcia-cs package there

    1. Re:Loopback device fixed..and new pcmcia-cs 3.1.29 by evildead · · Score: 1

      loop.c is easy to fix in 2.4.14. Just remove the two lines that say 'deactivate_page'

    2. Re:Loopback device fixed..and new pcmcia-cs 3.1.29 by JahToasted · · Score: 1
      There is also a new (at last! almost 4 months since .29) 3.1.30 pcmcia-cs package


      Wow... cool... thanks for letting me know, and according to the changelog the preemptable kernel patch will work now... Have a lot of patching to do this weekend.

  40. Problem with ALSA and 2.4.15? by Yomlogs · · Score: 1
    Hmm, my very first /. post and it's a complaint. ALSA 0.5.12 (emu10k1 driver) seems to have been broken by this release - amixer returns this error:

    amixer: Mixer 0/0 open error: Invalid argument

    ...and xmms segfaults immediately. :-(

  41. direct links to kernel mirrors by ddent · · Score: 3, Redundant

    Please avoid slashdoting the main server. Here is list of direct links to mirrors, by country.

    Version 2.4.15, full tarball:
    al
    dz
    as
    ad
    ao
    ai
    aq
    ag
    ar
    am
    aw
    ac
    au
    at
    az
    av
    bs
    bh
    bd
    bb
    by
    be
    bz
    bj
    bm
    bt
    bo
    ba
    bw
    bv
    br
    io
    bn
    bg
    bf
    bi
    kh
    cm
    ca
    ic

  42. Almost totally off-topic but... by biglig2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...reading this I went over to catch up on AC's diary. More human interest than the change log. Got to November 5th and read:

    "Windows installation day one. Getting rid of the old windows was easy - they fell apart quite happily, and certainly wont be re-installable anywhere else. "

    Blimey, I thought, until I remembered his house is getting done up...

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    1. Re:Almost totally off-topic but... by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Yes same here, I almost spit my thee over my laptop.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    2. Re:Almost totally off-topic but... by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      ...and he hasn't updated it for a week...

  43. please mod parent down, this is rediculous by CaraCalla · · Score: 1

    In a strict sense its true that the post is "Informative". As informative as if he wrote that Slashdot is usually green, that Rodger Rabbit is a Cartoon and that Bin Laden is evil.

    Did I already mention that Bin Laden is evil?

    --
    Live on earth may be expensive, but it includes an annual free trip around the sun!

    1. Re:please mod parent down, this is rediculous by MartinG · · Score: 1

      ask your mum to get you a sarcasm detector for xmas :)

      my post was not supposed to be informative (although strictly it is as you point out)

      Those who share my sense of humour might have said funny rather than informative.

      --
      -- MartinG To mail me: echo kewyjlcxyzvjfxbqwh | tr bcefhjklqvwxyz .@adgimnoprstu
  44. Network downtime by YellowSubRoutine · · Score: 1

    Curiously trying this patch on a 2.4.13 machine a while back, I found myself in the very unpleasant situation of having about 50% packet loss towards that host (lan where I have absolutely 0% loss regulary)

    No-one can explain this, but two very identical setups, only differing by this patch...

  45. Preemptability has nothing to do with stability by barneyfoo · · Score: 2

    Preemptability is just a feature that you can add to your kernel to make kernel threads preemptable (using the in-place SMP infrastructure).

    Preemptability is not:

    -an attempt to fix a bug in linux or make linux more stable
    -a way to make Linux slightly more advanced than MacOS
    -Something that is desperately needed

    Preemptability is:

    -A way to make processes that have long execution threads inside the kernel not take away from higher priority user-space threads (priority is not the same as niceness).

    So PLEASE, lets stop this bandying about of "preemptability" when you know not of what you speak.

  46. Why? by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    Quick question: I was wondering why there is so much fuss about this KBuild thing, and why there is going to be so much time / resouces spent on it in 2.5. I have never had a problem with the current kernel config, and find it quite intuitive (make xconfig especially). I can think of many more things which I would think deserve a higher priority than this. Someone care to enlighten me?

    1. Re:Why? by Crimson+Midget · · Score: 2

      The changes aren't so much for you the user, as they are for the developers and maintainers. The current system is a bit of a tangled mess and considered a hack. "make dep" is practically broken, configuration, compiling, pretty much everything takes longer than it should.

      But the user should see some changes as well. The configuration will be streamlined, and some level of automatic configuration will be available. According to Eric the new system will make it impossible to create invalid configurations. Also, a single "make" will compile everything you need, including modules and dependencies. Parallel builds will be improved and it will be possible to build individual sections instead of recompiling the whole kernel if need be.
      However, there is a big gripe some have with CML2; it's (currently) implemented in python.

  47. Marcelo Tosatti by rammer · · Score: 1

    Why is Marcelo Tosatti maintaining the 2.4.x tree?
    Is Alan Cox still tied up in 2.2.x maintenance or is he just tired of maintaining stable trees?

    Anyone know more about this guy?
    I know he's been a kernel hacker for a long time and has done some work with linux-ha project.

    1. Re:Marcelo Tosatti by Teukels · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Marcello is maintaining 2.4.15> because Alan Cox won't, it seems he made a personal choice.
      Alan Cox is going to be in touch more with the customers of his employer, RedHat.

      Marcello is a knowledgeable guy, he has proven to be sceptical and is imho able to discriminate well between a 'bad' patch and a Good(TM) patch. Alan said he would assist and advice Marcello if he needed help.

      If you want to know more about Alan Cox, please search google for Alan's diary and website. (Or try Telsa's website, might be even more fun to read.)

    2. Re:Marcelo Tosatti by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      linux.org.uk

  48. Unprofessionalism has a price by Sits · · Score: 2, Informative
    If you use make bzlilo then you will end up with the error:

    Fatal: Label "2415-greased-turkey" is too long

    While it's easy enough to fix (edit lilo.conf), I bet this is going to cause problems for someone.

  49. I'm crying by barneyfoo · · Score: 2

    really, I am.

    but anyway, last I checked "make install" put bzImage into /boot/vmlinuz and System.map into /boot/System.map, and move your old vmlinuz and System.map to vmlinuz.old and System.map.old, then reran lilo.

    Never used make bzlilo myself. Sounds like one of those features of the kernel you really shouldn't use, but some people do, and if you do use it you should really know what you're doing, but I guess that should be true of anyone compiling their own kernel.

  50. 2.5 not fully open yet by kanelephant · · Score: 2, Informative
    It will probably be at least a week until 2.5 really gets moving. Linus on the lkml
    ...when I release 2.4.15, I'll at the same time release a 2.5.0 that is identical except for version number (that makes synchronization easier later on). And I'll probably _not_ start accepting all the big waiting patches immediately, I'd rather wait for at least a week or two to see that there aren't any other issues.

    It's much easier doing some of the IO patches in particular knowing that the base you start out from is stable.

    Linus

    -K
  51. my god, slashdot sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I submitted the same story 3 hours prior, only to have it rejected. What the fuck is wrong with you people? Moreover, more often than not, I can't log on from Netscape/Linux; I have to use IE6 from windows for chrisakes.

    1. Re:my god, slashdot sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also, why is galeon crashing everytime I open slashdot?? nothing changed about the galeon I had installed... perhaps it has to do with whoever kidnapped CT and put that "love the xbox' statement in his mouth.
      yeah, their story posting is a sham, i think. I have sent stories only to have it posted under someone else's name, like that person had a better write up, or is better friends with the editors, or something.

  52. Bad Timing by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

    I had some free time after stuffing my face with Greased Turkey(tm), so I compiled 2.4.15-pre8 for ext3 support. Then, when I got to work this morning, I found out that Linus had not only released 2.4.15, but also 2.5! Damn, damn, damn!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    1. Re:Bad Timing by be-fan · · Score: 2

      It's not that bad! I track the XFS tree, so I tend to compile the kernel every few pre-patches (this is a personal workstation, so it doesn't matter). It takes 15 minutes to do the compile, as long as you keep your config files around. Quite painless, really.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  53. Oops. by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

    Oops...
    Something weird happened...

    Corrected version:

    And what happens if you have three versions: x, y, and z

    y has an extra variable in struct a from x
    z has an extra variable in struct a from x

    You upgrade from x -> z

    What happens?

  54. 3 stage? no. by evil_one · · Score: 1

    In the case of the Linux kernel we have maintaince and development.

    Major changes in structure and systems are made in development, with drivers added as well.
    Maintaince is bugfixes and drivers.
    That's it.
    The reason that 2.5 didn't open sooner is that the 2.4 series was not stable enough for the maintainer's taste. Now that it is, active development (rather than maintaince) will continue.

    --
    Desperation is a stinky cologne
    1. Re:3 stage? no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, I say he's right. early 2.4 has a whole string of changes that were definitely more than 'bugfixes and drivers' (VM espescially). Only now has it really settled down into pure maintenence, as kernel hackers move forward with all the cool stuff for 2.5 :-)

  55. PPC woes by vs · · Score: 1
    Yeah, and as PenguinPPC mentions somebody spilled PPC support.

    The advantage is that we probably get the most obscure unames ever: Linux issan 2.4.13-benh+xfs+ipsec-snap+irda-hotfix #1

  56. Yes it does !!! by Macka · · Score: 1


    Because there are lots and lots and lots of people like *me* who are pleased that Slashdot keep track of the kernel releases.

    What's your problem? If you don't see the point in it, don't open up the bloody article. If costs you what ... 2 seconds of your life to skip onto the next one!

    You're in the minority here pal, accept it and move on. Better still, edit your preferences and screen out the stuff you don't like. That's why they are there!

  57. SCSI Emulation? by evil_one · · Score: 2

    It's actually not emulation, but transport. ATAPI is actually SCSI, implemented on top of IDE. Remember those parallel port zip drives? They are SCSI over parallel port. SCSI "emulation" simply lets userspace apps talk to the devices in their "native" tounge.

    --
    Desperation is a stinky cologne
  58. talk about verison inflation by Cardhore · · Score: 2

    sheesh. 2.4 to 2.5 and not a single change.

    1. Re:talk about verison inflation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....dipshit

  59. Version numbers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats why microsoft called windows 4.0 95!

  60. Two different things: Kbuild and CML2 by LunaticLeo · · Score: 1

    Kbuild is the new Makefile system. As you said "make dep" is reliable, faster compiles (search google for "recursive makefiles harmful", more parallelism in the make (same recursive makefile problem), easier for developers to use.

    CML2 is the rule system for features to be compiled into the kernel. The rule solver is built in python.I am a perl guy, but I see no problem with this. Unified text, curses, and GUI configurator. The problem it solves is it is possible to compile a kernel with features requiring subsystems like SysV IPC, but not actually having SysV IPC included in the kernel build.

    These efforts are complementary. Makefiles are the low level rules to compile code and CML2 is the high level rules for whole features/subsystems.

    --
    -- I am not a fanatic, I am a true believer.
  61. Download Patch Here by Laven · · Score: 1

    It seems that a patch against 2.4.15-pre9 was released, but the web page wasn't updated. You can get it from here. http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/ preempt-kernel/2.4/

  62. thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    thanks for that info, you saved my day :)

  63. Warning: Troll - Re:Todo list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * Raw access to block devices (DB work)

    Can anyone say "cache coherency". I knew you could. FreeBSD had this but removed it a year ago because it's impossible (and would defeat the purpose of raw access) to keep the buffer/cache aware of what's going on.

    * Block layer redesign (scsi, ide, etc)

    Try, oh try again. So this will be the third scsi layer in the 2.x series? Hopefully it will be done right this time.

  64. ALSA and the 2.(4.15|5.0) kernel by pwagland · · Score: 2
    Hi all,

    While we are talking about incompatible kernel patches, please be aware that ALSA 0.5.12 does not work under 2.4.15. You need to get the CVS version, as described here. ALSA 0.5.12 compiles, but does not work.

    1. Re:ALSA and the 2.(4.15|5.0) kernel by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1


      ALSA v0.9.0.beta9 works great on kernel 2.4.14. I can't imagine it breaking in the next kernel. I don't think anyone, other than a packages maintainer, would really care that they had ALSA 0.5.12 working on a kernel version.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    2. Re:ALSA and the 2.(4.15|5.0) kernel by pwagland · · Score: 2

      Actually, it only appears to work great. The great conumdrum, is something broken if it appears to work? Read up more here. I.e. It does have the same problem, it is just masked....

      For good details on what broke ALSA 0.5.12, see here.

  65. Linux NFS by cpeterso · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that Linux NFS is perpetually broken and outdated. I believe there will be another NFS rewrite for Linux 2.5.

    With so many compete rewrites planned (VM, SCSI, VFS, NFS, ...) for Linux 2.5, does that mean Linux is really great or just really sucky?

    1. Re:Linux NFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or maybe it means 2.5->3.0 instead of 2.5->2.6 :-)

  66. Warning: DO NOT use ext3 with recent -ac kernels by archnerd · · Score: 1

    Later versions of the -ac kernel contain an ext3 bug that causes frequent kernel panics. This bug is introduced into the linus kernel in 2.4.15-pre2 and fixed in 2.4.15-pre8. Bottom line: ext3 users should use 2.4.15/2.5.0, not 2.4.13-ac8.

  67. Re:Belch... by Fucky+the+troll · · Score: -1

    Yeah, I think I'd fuck it.

    --






    Roadkill is yummy.
  68. MOD THIS UP! Hilarious!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    (but true)

  69. Warning: likely file corruption bug in 2.4.15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (dirty data does not get written onu nmount)

    Copy from linux-kernel mail (by Alexander Viro)

    Again, as a workaround - sync before umount (and don't boot
    unpatched 2.4.15/2.4.15-pre9 again, obviously).

    Breakage happens when you umount filesystem (_any_ local filesystem, be
    it ext2, reiserfs, whatever) that still has dirty inodes.

    IOW, if you are running 2.4.15 - build a patched kernel, install it and
    do the following:
    * switch to single-user
    * sync
    * umount everything non-buys
    * remount the rest read-only
    * turn the thing off
    * boot with patched kernel or with anything before 2.4.15-pre9

  70. How are preX patches applied? by Sanity · · Score: 2

    I have been trying to figure out how the pre-release kernel patches are applied. I have tried using the patch-kernel script to no avail. Are they patches against the previous prerelease, or the previous release?

    1. Re:How are preX patches applied? by AYEq · · Score: 1

      the preX patches are applied against the last releases source. ex.

      2.4.15-pre5 is applied against 2.4.142.4.15-pre6 is also applied against a virgin 2.4.14

      I think that www.bzimage.org has some incremental patches though, but I have never used them.

  71. Ext3 Utilities / Updates by PM4RK5 · · Score: 1

    For those of you actually compiling in ext3 support, you're going to need the new ext2 / ext3 tools (1.25) which adds support for ext3 filesystems. Then you should run:

    tune2fs -j (device)

    for each device, to add ext3 journaling to existing ext2 partitions.

  72. File system corruption under 2.4.15 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is file system corruption bug in the 2.4.15
    Here is a description a what to do if you are running 2.4.15 already. And here is the cure.

  73. Unmount problem with 2.4.15-final (BPB Release) by mikefe · · Score: 1

    Hello,

    It looks like this may be another BPB - Brown Paper Bag - 2.4 kernel release.

    There is already a patch available though from Al Viro.

    I believe Al can say it best. Here he is replying to war on LKML:

    Damn this junk removal feature. I could've quoted if it didn't have trouble with ">"!! Grr.

    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=1 00 655627817897&w=2

    References:
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=1 00 655058402225&w=2

    Patch:
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=1 00 655322609664&w=2

    --
    There: Something at a specific location.
    Their: Owned by someone.
    Please make sure your english compiles.
  74. Don't use this release: FS-corruption problem by spektr · · Score: 1

    A bug in the inode handling of 2.4.15 can leave stale inodes (unremovable files) when a filesystem is unmounted. The problem exists for all filesystem types. Do not use 2.4.15-pre9 and 2.4.15-final and wait for the patch.

    Al Viro on linux-kernel: Sigh... Supposed fix to problems with stale inodes was completely broken.
    What we need is "if we are doing last iput() on fs that is getting shut, sync it and don't leave it in cache". And yes, we have a similar path in iput(). Similar, but not quite the same.


    Al Viro on linux-kernel:Breakage happens when you umount filesystem (_any_ local filesystem, be it ext2, reiserfs, whatever) that still has dirty inodes.

    IOW, if you are running 2.4.15 - build a patched kernel, install it and do the following:
    * switch to single-user
    * sync
    * umount everything non-busy
    * remount the rest read-only
    * turn the thing off
    * boot with patched kernel or with anything before 2.4.15-pre9


    Russel King on linux-kernel: I think 2.4.15-greased-turkey should be renamed to 2.4.15-dead-duck. 8)

    1. Re:Don't use this release: FS-corruption problem by spektr · · Score: 1

      Here's another useful post from Russel King on linux-kernel for those who ran into troubles:

      > What kind of breakage are we looking at here? I had a system that ran 2.4.15
      > and got shut down without a sync. What kind of corruption will occur and is
      > it something a simple fsck will fix?

      fsck does seem to fix it, but it won't automatically detect the problem
      (since the filesystem is marked clean).

      It basically removes the inodes from the disk, but leaves the names in
      the directory. On the next boot, init scripts which clear out certain
      directories fail, and various daemons fail to start because of it.

      It seems that the only solution is to force a fsck at boot:

      shutdown -F -r now

      should do the trick.

    2. Re:Don't use this release: FS-corruption problem by spektr · · Score: 1

      ...and by the way: kernel.org just crashed.

      H. Peter Anvin wrote on linux-kernel:

      zeus.kernel.org has suffered what appears to be a multiple disk RAID
      failure, and no longer appears to boot. I can't do any further
      diagnostic without physical access to the machine; however, there is a
      good chance we have lost a RAID.

      I will attempt to bring the machine back, but, in the meantime, I
      would like to ask if there is anyone or any company who would be
      willing to donate eight (8) 73 GB SCA SCSI disks on short notice. We
      have been suffering from a shortage of space on the affected RAID for
      quite a while, and if it is truly dead it might be reasonable to
      replace the drives with higher-capacity ones instead.

      Please email me if you would be able to help.

      -hpa

  75. And at last, the solar designer patch is ported... by MattW · · Score: 2

    According to openwall, the non-exec stack and other security patches so useful in 2.0.x and 2.2.x are finally on the way to 2.4.x, giving you that extra bit of protection. Of course, it looks like it will have its own beta period, but those patches protected my 2.0.x box for quite a while from 0-day exploits, and let it manage a full year of uptime at one point despite dozens of users and a bunch of services (including the ever-dangerous wu-ftpd).

  76. 2.4.15 corrupts data by damian · · Score: 1

    as most of you lkml reading people surely noticed: 2.4.15 corrupts data when you unmount a filesystem (for example when rebooting), it doesn't do a sync before the umount.

    Back out to 2.4.15-pre8 to avoid it. Or find the patch on lkml.

  77. FS corruption -- see link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    FYI :: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=100 655058402225&w=2

    Hope it helps to avoid problems for some.

  78. What Linux needs is a Documentation czar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever looked in the Documentation directory recently?

    It's a MESS.

    Ever noticed other documentation spread out through the Linux source tree? Yeah, it's a mess too.

    I'd have a stab at cleaning the Documentation tree up so that it mirrors the layout of the rest of the source tree if only there was a hope in hell of Linus accepting the patch and integrating it in.

  79. Patching again... getting XPish hein? by CapnGrunge · · Score: 1

    Heck, I didn't like it when I immediately had to patch 2.4.14 due to the problem of loopback. Now I wonder when I will finally be able to upgrade my HP NetServer with a Cyclades PC300 with *one* kernel.

    --
    I see 57005 people
  80. Re:And at last, the solar designer patch is ported by CTachyon · · Score: 1
    According to openwall, the non-exec stack and other security patches so useful in 2.0.x and 2.2.x are finally on the way to 2.4.x, giving you that extra bit of protection.

    These days, many writers of buffer overflow exploits (the *only* exploit that a non-exec stack could possibly save you from, in case you didn't know) assume that vulnerable software is running with a non-exec stack, and code around it. Non-exec stack patches may have saved you from the 'kiddies in the past, but they afford no protection in 2001, although it certainly doesn't hurt your security so long as Assumption #0 is that the 'kiddies won't even be slowed down by it.

    --
    Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  81. Re:And at last, the solar designer patch is ported by MattW · · Score: 2

    No one, least of all me, said that a non-exec stack was all you needed to keep a box safe. However, it is still useful to have, and contains a variety of other useful patches, just as restricted access to /proc and some things to avoid games in /tmp, like symlinks to other system files, etc. Nonetheless, there's also such a plethora of buffer overruns available, and they are still common, probably because there is so much "example" code available, and smashing the stack is easier to code than trying to heap overrun malloc'd values or whatever a would-be exploiter might choose to do. Furthermore, many exploits that make it into the wild begin as proof-of-concepts, and therefore START as buffer overflows, since the writer has no intention of cracking anything. Several buffer exploits have been out in 2001. If you buy yourself any extra time, it is a patch well-applied, and the other features may be useful depending on the system.

    Alternately, a lock on your house door won't protect you from a burglar (the *only* entry that a lock will stop is a standard check-for-open-door entry, in case you didn't know), so you can have a lock on your door, as long as Assumption #0 is that the lock won't even slow down a burglar.

  82. Raw devices are good by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2

    You aren't supposed to use block and character devices for the same device at the same time!

    You have the raw device ignore the buffer cache. If you must switch between block and char devices (unlikely), use the block device, then flush it before any access to the character device (unless it already has been flushed).

    Just because using raw char devices messes up the block device cache isn't a reason to remove the feature. It is a reason to NOT MISUSE the feature.

    Do your light sockets have anything in them designed to keep your tougue out of them? ;)

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  83. Patch download for FS corruption problem by DeeKayWon · · Score: 2

    If you try to cut and paste from the mailing list archives, you'll probably have spaces instead of tabs in the patch, causing patch to choke on it. I've put a tabbed patch up here.

  84. Re:And at last, the solar designer patch is ported by CTachyon · · Score: 1
    No one, least of all me, said that a non-exec stack was all you needed to keep a box safe.

    Cool. It's just that there are quite a few people out there who think that having a non-exec stack is some sort of magic pixie dust that will guard against all buffer overflows, and I felt obliged to point it out in case you were one of them (which you obviously aren't).

    --
    Range Voting: preference intensity matters