Slashdot Mirror


Wiring A New House?

jbp123 asks: "I'm building a new house. Once the electrician has run the phone lines I want to run cat5e ethernet cable. I figure two drops to each of the 6 rooms with phone lines. I've never done this but my plan is to run the ethenet cable through the same path that the phone lines follow. I'll use up the rest of the 1000 foot spool by running a third cable to a few of the rooms. Ethernet cable is cheap. I found solid cat5e 1000 foot spools for $60 delivered so the decision to run cat5e cable is a no brainer. The question is should I run fiber? I really don't know how much the cable costs since I don't know what cable to use. It is much easier to run cable before the drywall goes in so I want to make an informed decision now. Ten years from now will I need/want fiber?"

232 of 730 comments (clear)

  1. Fiber? What other cables. by jarodss · · Score: 4, Redundant

    Not like this hasn't popped up on slash a few times before, but why only phone, cat5 and fiber?

    What about running Svideo and RCA to everyroom or an extra drop of cat5 to run sound on?

    And as far as running the cat5 parallel to the phone, if your building the house why not set your cables into conduits, that way you can upgrade to whatever cabling you need in ten years.

    1. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by demaria · · Score: 2, Redundant

      I'd be surprised if the Svideo or RCA cable can handle any decent level of quality on a long run. RJ6 (coax) would be a better choice there, it's easy to tap and can go long distances.

      There is technology coming down the pike (some available today) that will allow digital video to run over Cat5E cable.

    2. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by Colin · · Score: 4, Redundant
      What about running Svideo and RCA to everyroom or an extra drop of cat5 to run sound on?

      There are various (cheapish - under $100) ways of running video over Cat5. Personally, I've got Cat5 and audio cables into rooms, and run everything over that.

      However, 2 per room is not enough. There are a number of reasons for this:

      • They're never where you want them. You'll always want to move stuff around, and cables draped across the floor doesn't look good.
      • Once you've got the cables in, you'll see more uses. For example, telephone, TV, Audio for hifi, remote control for hifi, remote control for lighting, PC network - all possibly in one room.
      • When building, it's cheap. It's much easier to put these cables in before the drywall goes up. Trying to fish them through afterwards is hard work. BTDT

      Don't bother with fibre. It's not going to get used. People have been saying "fibre is the next big thing" for 5 years now - and cable just keeps catching up. Video over Cat5 is cheap - so, instead of piping cable round the house, put all the set top boxes in one location, and remote control them. 100Mb Ethernet is very cheap - VHS video quality needs about 3 Mb/sec, so you can stream that across existing networks. Hi definition uncompressed video is more than 100Mb/sec - but 1Gb/sec over copper is on the horizon.

    3. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by demaria · · Score: 2

      Same thing with power outlets. There used to never be enough power outlets in rooms. Then that changed over the past few decades. :)

      Remote control for lighting should be done with X-10 enabled equipment. It's a simple, low speed network, but it doesn't need to be fast. Most X-10 devices just need to turn on or off. Plus it runs over the existing power lines, so that will save a lot of money not having to run all those cables to turn on each light.

      HDTV at its max resolution, uncompressed, requires 1.2Gbps. Heehee. Bandwidth! :)

    4. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by isorox · · Score: 4, Redundant

      We have 20m runs of svideo at the uni tv station no problem. If you're more interested in length though we've done 100+m runs of high quality microphone cable (for video, £1.40 a metre), and 5-m+ runs of cheap (15p/metre) common tv cable with a couple of bnc or composite ends stuck on.

      We have a 300m rj6 crap quality cable with 2 20db boosters and a high output on the VTR at the start and another booster at the end (before a proper industry booster and splitter with another 200m run from there).

      If you need more then a 50m (150 foot) single run in your new house I'm envious.

      However its all very well dropping in whatever cables you need, think about how you are going to use them - do you really want them all arriving in your basement? Drop a lot more cable down to your living room, just in case.

      Might be worthwhile sticking some cheap speaker wire or 2 core mains flex down there too - if you need a signal.

      And finaly, whatever you come up with, double it. A video signal to each room is fine, until you want a tv in there, and a camera.

    5. Re:Fiber? What other cables. by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • There used to never be enough power outlets in rooms. Then that changed over the past few decades

      Depends. My house was built in 1988, has on average 4 outlets per room, and I still needed to add 6 x 4-gang strips to power all my toys.

      I fully agree with the sentiment that you can't put too much cable in. Skimp now, and you'll be paying later to put in hubs or switches in every room.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  2. Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by Keefesis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As long as you're using shielded cat5 cable and your phone lines are shielded, you shouldn't have a problem running them through the same conduit. Be aware, however, that if you run your cat5 cable within 6 inches (safe margin) of electrical sources, you will see interference and will experience performance problems. I'm not sure what your electrical people are doing, but it's common to place electrical outlets near phone outlets (fax machines, cordless phones, etc). Just FYI, be aware of this.

    1. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by Fozz · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, phone lines are low-voltage and should not represent much of an interference problem with your ethernet signals. Keeping your CAT5 at least 6-12 inches away from any 120V AC lines running parallel is always a good idea.

      Always cross your CAT5 and 120V power cables as perpendicular as possible to avoid crosstalk.

    2. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by Kallahar · · Score: 2

      Phone lines have 40V nominal and 80V+ rings. Low voltage is < 12V. You're right though, they usually don't interfere with other devices.

      Travis

    3. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by shepd · · Score: 2

      >Two wires twisted together picks up virtually nothing

      No, they pick up twice as much as a single untwisted wire.

      The reason why they seem immune to noise is because the receiver doesn't look directly at the voltage on the cable (such as a TV does), but instead it looks at the difference between the voltages on the pair. This means that if a 60V spike is induced near the pair, both wires go up 60V but when you subtract (for example) 72V from 60V you end up with 12V, thereby removing the interference.

      The twist ensures the interference is equal. Without the twist, the level of interference on one line could be greater than the other, thereby degrading the signal.

      I expect that the ground cable is providing a minimal amount of sheilding because the twists case it to "wrap" around the signal wire, thereby ensuring you get some kind of picture.

      >A friend of mine uses it for composite video.

      I'm very surprised this works. Analog video signals don't do a difference voltage check; One wire is expected to be directly tied to earth, which would short out the transmitter if it were differential.

      >And, by the way, add some good, strong cotton string with all your cables.

      Agreed, but don't use cotton. As it is organic after a few years it will rot, and then you're SOL. Use something inorganic, like that "cheap" twine you see the phone company installers carry about with them.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by crucini · · Score: 3, Informative
      I'm sorry phone lines are not low voltage and they do cause interference with CAT5 cable.

      Anyone can define "low voltage" however he wants. Check out this link for some of the ways NEC seems to define low voltage. Most electricians would say that less than 600 volts is low voltage, and this is also how the state of California defines it..
      Phone lines run at a much higher frequency (around 2.6khz)...

      Phone lines carry the speech spectrum, roughly 300 hz to 3000 hz. They also carry DC (0 hz) and ringing current (20 hz). They can also carry square-edged pulses made by hanging up a phone with a mechanical switch, for example, or dialing with a mechanical rotary phone. Such pulses contain energy far up the RF spectrum. Of course, a phone line carrying DSL will have lots of high-frequency energy above 3000 hz.
      ... but they only run at around 60v (I believe).

      Phone lines use a nominal 48 volt battery. When you pick up the phone, most of that voltage is lost in the loop and you get 6 to 8 volts across the line. Ringing current is AC, ranging from 80 to 110 volts.
      What all this means is that phone lines have a shorter range but can cause more interference, and power lines have greater range but won't completely wreck the signal.

      Phone lines can run for many miles without significant loss of signal or power. 120 volt power lines cannot. If you live in a house in the US, your phone line probably goes several miles to the CO, but your power line goes straight to a nearby transformer that feeds it from a higher distribution voltage. As for interference, power lines don't just carry 60 hz - they carry substantial amounts of energy at higher frequencies, caused by motors, light ballasts, switching power supplies and other equipment. I think a power line is more likely to contribute noise to a data circuit than a phone line is.
    5. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by mpe · · Score: 2

      Two parallel wires makes an antenna. Picks up anything. Two wires twisted together picks up virtually nothing.

      Not exactly the twisting means that the signal picked up in each wire tends towards being 180 degrees out of phase. Such the resultant signals almost cancel each other out.

      You can use Cat 5 for just about anything with low voltage. A friend of mine uses it for composite video. I expect plain audio signals to travel excellently through the cat 5. Use your imagination.

      line level audio though. Even though the cable might be ok voltagewise for speakers it isn't going to be happy with the current.

    6. Re:Running Ethernet With Phone Lines by autocracy · · Score: 2

      The post you replied to did NOT say that running cable near phone lines should be avoided - only that people tend to put electrical wires there, which you should avoid.

      --
      SIG: HUP
  3. Phone wire?!?? by atporter · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just use the Cat5 for everything. An RJ-11 will fit in an RJ-45 jack just fine. Tie it all back to a patch pannel in the basement and then you can patch phones/ethernet/whatever to your hearts content.

    1. Re:Phone wire?!?? by blacklambda · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just be careful... putting a 2-pair modular connector in the space for a 4-pair can bend the pins on the outside of the 4-pair.

      --
      Ryan Dorman, CCNA Network Communications Specialist Millersville Univesrity
    2. Re:Phone wire?!?? by mpe · · Score: 2

      Just use the Cat5 for everything. An RJ-11 will fit in an RJ-45 jack just fine

      So long as you don't mind the risk of damaging pins 1 and 8 on the RJ45. No pin 1 means you can't use the socket for ethernet...

    3. Re:Phone wire?!?? by mpe · · Score: 2

      I work for a university and you wouldn't believe how many ethernet ports we have to replace because someone could grasp the concept of the "data" and "phone" labels above ports and jammed their phone cord in the ethernet port and wiggled it around trying to get it to work before moving it to the phone one

      The alternative would be to fit the telephones with RJ45s... Which is quite simple to do with the appropriate tools.

  4. Only if you know what you're doing by nephorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fiber can be a pain in the ass to put in. Make sure you don't touch the actual glass... you'll never get those splinters out.
    If you have the means to put in fiber, though, go right ahead... but don't get secondary support equipment for it, as that might change by the time you want to put it into use.

    1. Re:Only if you know what you're doing by Tuzanor · · Score: 2
      Make sure you don't touch the actual glass... you'll never get those splinters out.

      Lol! One of my telecom teachers was talking about that. He said in his younger years him and his buddies would always be doing that saying that it didn't do anything and they didn't feel anything. Now, he says, that he's older he's starting to notice them and it irritates his fingers and hands more and more...

      Another piece of sound advice with regards to fiber is DON'T LOOK DOWN THE GLASS IF ITS PLUGGED IN!! Fiber doesn't use those purty lights that you see at the end of those light strands you see in stores. It uses powerful and specific wavelengths of infrared and can damage your eyes like a solar eclips. The same telecom teacher as above says that you should always orient the fiber ports so that if you have to unplug them live, that it should hit your buddy standing beside you in the face, and not yours :-) Also because of that you should not place connections at eye level, because the server/router/whatever may still try to transmit down the line and instead hit your eyes.

  5. Price by utdpenguin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Im just guessing at numbers, but fiber is expensive now. It will get cheaper. Lets say the Cat5 isn't worth replacing for 10 years or so. In ten years fiber will be a _lot_ cheaper. Possibly cheap enogh to offset the cost and trouble of rewiring? Dunno, just thinking aloud.

    --
    In Soviet Russia you dant have to put up with these crappy jokes
  6. I don't know much about this.... by puppetman · · Score: 5, Funny


    but why don't you set it up so that in future years you can put in what ever cable you want?

    I always imagined having a duct built into the floor of my house, running along the walls, with a grate over top. I would run whatever in there, be it fibre or cat-5, etc.

    And if I ever went wireless, I could just fill it up with beer and use a really long straw.

  7. Run conduit by jalewis · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you run conduit, no matter what happens, you can run new cable later.

    If it was me I would run the cat5e now and include a string with the pull. Later you can attach whatever cable you want and pull it through. It will be difficult if you don't have conduit.

    My future plans include 802.11a, so I am not worried about fiber. I just need one run to the middle of the house for my AP. I am using 802.11b now and I am happy with the speed/wire trade off.

    Good luck!

    1. Re:Run conduit by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

      I had no trouble pulling cat5 through smurf tubing (actually pushing) without a string. Even if I had, it's quite simple to attach a string to a bit of plastic bag and suck it through using a vacuum cleaner.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    2. Re:Run conduit by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used 1/2" flexible NMT, aka smurf tubing, so-called because of its baby-blue color. It's big enough to hold three cat-5 wires. I would have preferred 1", or 3/4", but the 1/2" was all that the electrician's supply store had in stock. I realized that I wanted conduit shortly before the drywall was to go up; after I had installed all the cat5 I thought I would need.
      -russ

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    3. Re:Run conduit by mpe · · Score: 2

      If it were me, I'd recommend running Cat5 or better for both phone and networking - one drop for phone, one drop for data, both in the same conduit. For phone, you could probably settle for Cat3 for cost reasons, but using Cat5 or better would allow you to switch a phone jack to a network jack fairly easily

      Also just using once type of cable could end up cheaper. Since worst case senario is that you end up having nearly a whole spool of cable unused for each different kind of cable you install...

  8. Don't do either yet. by Toodles · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By the sound of the post, you feel that this is an urgent matter before the drywall goes up. It doesn't have to be. What you should be concerning yourself with putting in is conduit, not the wiring, if this is a house you plan on living in for a good long time.

    With good conduit, running wires is a fairly painless process. Install the conduit, let the contractors install the drywall, then run the cat5, fiber, whatever. After X many years, if you decide you need to upgrade to fiber or whatever is current enough for your needs, pulling the existing wire and replacing will be a cinch. By putting in the wiring now instead of conduit, you are speeding up the depreciation and obsolescense (sp?) of your house, not increasing it. Good conduit even helps with events you didn't plan, such as if you figure out you need to pull RCA cables for house-wide stereo, or additional coax, or whatever.

    Toodles

    --
    Toodles D. Clown
    1. Re:Don't do either yet. by imrdkl · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Depending on the construction and how he will use the ceiling space, conduit could be quite a luxury. Most wood-frame houses dont have a speck of conduit, relying on romex through the upright members, typically 1-2 rooms per circuit. Conduit would be great, but requires a whole different kind of electrical contractor/installer, typically. (one who can use a pipe-bender quite proficiently)

      In any case, if you do use conduit, be sure to follow the rule of at least two, tagged fishlines on every pipe from every jbox, for later use of pulling new wire in to the existing pipe.

      Back on topic, I believe that ethernet in the walls is more than sufficient. One can always bridge to a fiber link at the termination in the future, but the last-mile question for fiber is far from being answered clearly, it seems.

    2. Re:Don't do either yet. by mnordstr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, you should absolutely use conduit. After 10, 20 or 40 years, you'll be swearing and kicking the walls when you realize you have to change all the wires and you don't have conduit (unless everything has gone wireless, but I doubt that).

      However, you should really think about what kind of conduit you plan to use. After 40 years, things tend to rotten, and if you have cheap conduit it might not last that long. And while installing it, you should make it the simplest task to upgrade all the cables. You still have to do that one day...

      And the cables you want to run really depend on what you use them for. But if you know you don't really need fiber now, you most probably don't need it after 5 or 10 years. Go with the cat5e. If you notice you need fiber after 10 years, fine, rewire your house, it will be easy because you used good conduits, and fiber will probably cost next to nothing after 10 years.

    3. Re:Don't do either yet. by LordNimon · · Score: 2

      Conduit may not be an option. It can be very expensive, and most builders won't even do it.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    4. Re:Don't do either yet. by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Redundant

      Don't forget to put a nylon cord in the conduit when you install it. When you go to run a new cable, it's a lot easier to pull it through than to try to push it or get a fishtape through the conduit. And when you run the new cable, pull a new section of cord through with it for the next time.

    5. Re:Don't do either yet. by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Conduit would be great, but requires a whole different kind of electrical contractor/installer, typically. (one who can use a pipe-bender quite proficiently)

      High voltage electricians are all trained to use a pipe bender, and at least among the unscientific sampling of the ones I work with frequently, all prefer to EMT conduit even when they could get away with flexible armored.

      Low voltage guys seldom use metal pipe and probably aren't as experienced. It's hard to say what kind of guys are actually on the job at most wood stick construction new homes. The worst part of running pipe in a new home might be trying to figure out where it would run, locating and keeping accessable the jboxes, and convincing your builder that this is something worth messing with his schedule.

      The latter part is key, since the building, GC, and subs have wicked schedules that can get thrown when some homeowner wants to do something different in the middle of construction, especially if it involves a trade or skill they don't do on a normal basis.

    6. Re:Don't do either yet. by jcostom · · Score: 2

      Perhaps I'm missing something here... Presumably he's paying the builder, so the builder does what? Builds. Builds what the customer is asking for. It's not like he's asking for something unreasonable.

      --

      The unsig!
    7. Re:Don't do either yet. by crucini · · Score: 2
      Then how the heck do all the office buildings get built?

      The get built by a different set of folks. I've worked on residential, commercial and industrial construction, and they are totally different worlds. You could take an experienced residential electrician to an industrial job site and he probably couldn't identify most of the parts being installed. There are probably small towns where this isn't true because the same guy does everything.
      ... see if the plumber will run some dry pipes for you...

      Couple of problems with this. First, plumbing pipe is generally installed with hard 90's, not the sweep 90's of electrical conduit. Second, plumbers don't usually install pull boxes, nor would they know where those boxes are required by electrical code. Third, plumbers generally don't know electrical code at all. Which leads to: fourth: plumbing pipe is not UL listed as electrical conduit, even if it's physically almost the same thing.

      However this idea can work if you need fairly short, straight runs (no major planning required) and your inspector has already proved tolerant of such things.
    8. Re:Don't do either yet. by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2

      The problem is, at least here in Ottawa, if you demand that your builder do something that isn't "the norm", the builder will just tell you to screw off and sell the house to someone else.

      Seriously, it's that bad up here. You're lucky if you can get them to build your house to code, with all of the windows and doors in the right place, and within 4 months of the schedule!

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    9. Re:Don't do either yet. by yakfacts · · Score: 2

      While that is true, high-voltage guys also don't care about bending, crushing, folding or otherwise destroying the integrity of your CAT-5.

      If you tell them that a bend in the cable will ruin it, or that it cannot handle greater than a 50lb pull force, they assume you are an idiot.

  9. Combo by Karma+50 · · Score: 5, Informative

    How about this stuff

    A lot more expensive than plain cat5 though.

    --
    http://www.thehungersite.com
  10. Forget the Telephone Cable by GC · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may not be aware of this but you can use your Cat-5E cable to run your telephones over.

    I don't think you'll need Fibre - doesn't Cat-5E support gigabit speeds?

  11. Use a pullwire for future enhancement by fbrehm · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ten years from now will I need/want fiber? If you string another wire along with the CAT5 cable, you can use it to pull something else through in the future. Just make sure it doesn't bind anywhere. When you pull the new fiber/firewire/whatever through, pull another pullwire along with it.

    During the summers between college semesters I helped wire a factory. It involved pulling a lot of wires through pipes. We always pulled a few extra wires for spares and to act as pullwires.

  12. Ducts by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

    Put in ducts and modular faceplates, so you can replace the cables when something better comes along. Have all the ducts go straight down to the basement, and a duct around the ceiling of the basement with access at each joint with a vertical duct, then put your router in some inobtrusve corner of the basement.

    Have fun.

    --
    __
    Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    1. Re:Ducts by mini+me · · Score: 2

      Running the conduits strait down to the basement is a good idea. From there you can run the wires above a false celing to your wireing closet. This would make adding new wires a snap, just start dropping wire down the conduit until you can see it in the basement. If the conduit is big so it doesn't get stuck on other wires you won't even need a string or anything to pull it through (you might need a little weight on the wire though).

      You could even put in some empty ducts for future expansion (maybe 3 or 4 on every wall) even if you don't need/want cable there right now. No need to even put the face plate in yet, you could always cut that later (just rememeber where they go!!!)

      As for what wires to use: Cat-5e is a great start. You can run basically everything over it, from your LAN (obviously) to your telephone, to your audio and even your TV. But if you leave room for upgrades it doesn't matter what the future holds...

  13. Fiber is unlikely by demaria · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fiber is highly unlikely to be necessary or desirable in the next 10 to 20 years in residential housing. Install Cat5E cable, it'll handle gigabit which should be fast enough for just about everything.

    Instead of spending money on fiber, spend money to install conduit. Conduit conduit conduit! Conduit is nice since you can later on pull fiber or additional wires more easily.

  14. In ten years... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In ten years everything will be 802.11. So does it really matter? Just run the cat5.

    1. Re:In ten years... by cheetah · · Score: 2, Informative

      God, I hope not. 802.11b is slow, at only 11mbps it can take quite a while to copy anything larger than a 100meg. Backing up a few gigs would be a nightmare... 802.11a is 54mbps and that is not too bad. But I will stick with GigE so I can push +20Meg/sec to my sever...

      josh

    2. Re:In ten years... by autocracy · · Score: 2
      Read The F-ing Comment: In ten years everything will be 802.11.

      Where the hell is the letter B? There is one in that sentence, and it sure isn't after the 11!
      --
      SIG: HUP
  15. Both? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

    Fiber breaks fairly easily - its a big problem. You might put it in there, and have it work fine for a long time, and then something breaks SOMEWHERE and you don't know where, but you do know that you've lost your connection. Copper is far more durable. If you put in the fiber and the CAT5, you could use the cable as a backup.

    Having said that, 100Mb per second is pretty fast for games, X-clients/servers and harddrive reads and writes, unless you really want all the computers to act like one computer. Maybe that's what you want. I don't really care myself. If I want to work on another computer, I walk over to the other one and sit down. So even in the future, I'll probably always be happy with CAT5.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Both? by autocracy · · Score: 2

      Kevlar is tough stuff, that's why they use it on fibre...

      --
      SIG: HUP
  16. Fiber is still expensive by Maktoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Right now, I wouldn't even consider using fiber.

    You would need a lot of other hardware to make it work.

    With Ethernet, hubs and switches are cheap... you can wire everything back to a patch box and from there have it connect to your ADSL or cable modem.

    I'm not sure what the costs are on actual fiber cable, but it's certainly not as cheap as CAT5. What's more, you would either need a NIC in your computer capable of accepting fiber (over $US300 I think) or you would need a Fiber-->CAT5 converter box at each point where fiber comes out of the wall. Those boxes aren't cheap either.

    Really, it just comes down to this. If you want super-fast communication between your computers in your house, and are willing to pay a hefty premium, them fiber it is. But it's not going to make your Internet connection much faster. Your Internet connection will only every be as fast as whatever the Cable or DSL modem has going out... and that's usually a 10Mbs connection running at 2Mbs download max.

    Personally... if you want scalability, I would just make sure that the CAT5 you string is high quality and has *all eight conductors*... that way it is good for Gigabit Ethernet... which is slowly coming down in price and is already more affordable than Fiber for LANs.

    enjoy

    1. Re:Fiber is still expensive by demaria · · Score: 2, Informative

      "If you want super-fast communication between your computers in your house, and are willing to pay a hefty premium, them fiber it is."

      Cat5E does gigabit. Current consumer hard drives can barely sustain flooding fast ethernet, let along gig. Fiber (and some will argue gig) to consumer and midrange machines are overkill and will remain so for some time.

      However, Linksys has just released an 8 port gigabit switch for $189.

    2. Re:Fiber is still expensive by demaria · · Score: 2

      >I'm not sure what the costs are on actual fiber cable, but it's certainly not as cheap as CAT5.

      The price (as of about 2 weeks ago) for 1,000 feet of bulk Cat5E (PVC) from www.datacommwarehouse.com is $99.99, plenum is $279.99, two-wire PVC fiber costs $329.99, and two-wire plenum fiber is $349.99.

      Yes, I know datacomm isn't the cheapest place out there. :)

    3. Re:Fiber is still expensive by blackwizard · · Score: 2

      As this post points out, fiber is still expensive in that the interconnect equipment, etc, is expensive. The cable itself is, however, pretty cheap. I don't see how it could hurt to install it now while it's easy if you forsee using it in the future. You can always pull the (cheap) cable through, and install ends and what not later.

  17. Criswell Predicts by fm6 · · Score: 2

    Good point. Certainly a better approach than trying to predict what kind of networking technology will be "in" ten years from now!

  18. Wireless by tetrad · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why not forgo the whole cabling experience and go wireless instead? You can connect every room in the house with a single hub. It's cheaper than buying the cable and hub/switch, and a whole lot more convenient.

    1. Re:Wireless by zilym · · Score: 2

      I disagree. With wireless, you've got higher latency, considerably slower speeds due to it being a shared medium, and usually higher costs.

      With his golden opportunity with the walls down right now, there's no reason to forgo a nice Cat5 wiring. Wire is cheap, you can put gigabit ethernet over it (vs. 11Mbps currently for wireless 802.11b), you can use a switch in the network closet instead of a shared topology, and you don't have to worry about your neighbors snooping your local traffic.

      You can always use wireless later on if you really want to (like for laptops). However, don't use that as an excuse for laziness right now.

  19. Cat5 and Coax by Robert+Hayden · · Score: 4, Informative

    You should run two drops of Cat5 and two drops of RG6 Coax to every "main" room you may have people. Run it to a central cross-connect in the basement or garage.

    The reason you want to run two coax drops is that if you get a dual-tuner sattelite decoder (like a DirectTV TiVo) you will need to lines going out to your dish or to your multiswitch (which splits the signal between >2 lines, so you can put receivers in multiple rooms).

    You could also run a Left/Right RCA audio system to each room, but audio will travel decently over Cat5, so you shouldn't have to worry about that.

    Fiber would be useful, but frankly you don't need it now because nothing we are doing iwll need fiber probably for 10 years. If you want to prep for it, you can run conduit (probably 1.5" would be sufficient) to each room, to make pulling new cables in (or pulling old cables out) easier in 5 or 10 years. Run it to a modular mounting jack so you can change stuff out if need be.

    Having just recently gotten my DirectTV TiVo (and hacked it to 146 hours of storage), I know my next house is gonna need twin coax to every main room. :-)

    1. Re:Cat5 and Coax by tzanger · · Score: 2

      The reason you want to run two coax drops is that if you get a dual-tuner sattelite decoder (like a DirectTV TiVo) you will need to lines going out to your dish or to your multiswitch (which splits the signal between >2 lines, so you can put receivers in multiple rooms).

      Umm.. why not only run two pair from the dish (dual LNBF) to the control box?

      From what I understand of Digital Satellite, you have the even transponders on one frequency and the odd ones on another. Your receiver selects the frequency by sending a DC voltage to the LNBF, since they are essentially just Gunn diodes. If you want two receivers to watch two channels which are potentially on different transponders, you need two LNBFs, or a single dual so each can select the frequency.

      Now I've seen satellite control boxes which block the DC from all the receivers and "permanently" tune one LNBF to the odd transponders and the other LNBF to the even ones. Then it electronically connects the RF coming from the appropriate Gunnplexer to the receiver based on the voltage the reciever is sending. Large hotels and apartment buildings do this, IIRC.

      What I'd love to do if I could keep the signal quality is to have a receiver which decodes all the channels I'm entitled to simultaneously and then remodulate them on to regular CATV frequencies so I could watch satellite TV from any TV in my house without another $#%!^*ing receiver and card to deal with.

      Actually I think the ideal solution would be a cPCI backplane system which, at its core, was a satellite receiver/decoder/hard drive and any number of plug-in DSP/playback/remodulator/control units. The idea would be to plug your dual LNBF-dish into the thing and it would take care of your SINGLE card. The main unit has a large RAID array which takes the MPEG2 streams and directly saves them to HDD as requested by the control cards.

      Now, for each TV, you plug in a control/decode card which takes the commands from your remote for channel change/record/menu/etc.. Now you can watch any channel, record it (pause live tv), watch pre-recorded shows, etc.

      The backplane is only responsible for the connections and the system housekeeping. The control cards have the MPEG2 decoder and act as the cross-connect between the raw MPEG2 stream and the HDD (not physically, but logically) -- If you have an HDTV TV, you buy the HDTV control card with optical 5.1 audio and component video. cheap-ass 13" you bought for $5? Then you buy the cheap-ass RF modulator version of the control card.

      And of course, you can run other inputs and select/control them from any TV. DVD/Laserdisc, VCRs, broadcast TV, door-Cam...

      Damn... now where do I go to build this? I've got the engineering background, just not the connections into the DTV/satellite market. The last time I asked for specs on a satellite decoder chip I was told to go fuck myself in BusinessSpeak. Damn... I wonder if a Slashdot posting would count as Prior Art if someone tries to patent this and lock me out...

  20. Fiber backbone, maybe, but... by Party+Remover · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...do you really want to have to standardize on fiber adapters for all your devices?

    Besides, GigE over copper is here now. I've just purchased an old house that needs a lot of electrical work -- while the walls are open, I plan on running Cat 6 STP cabling to my drops.

    GigE might be the last gasp for copper. Then again, some were saying that about Fast Ethernet when that debuted.

    Trying to build in anticipation of what the standard will be in 2012 is an expensive crapshoot. Go with what works now (i.e. Cat 5e/6) and count on the size of the installed base to ensure continued support for it.

  21. Conduits by Glytch · · Score: 2

    Shielded conduits would be more useful. More expensive now, but makes it dead simple to upgrade ten years from now.

  22. Talk To the HVAC Guys by linuxbert · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rather then running seperate conduite for cableing, use the cold air returns. talk to the HVAC (heating/vent/Air cond) and makesure that you have a main return running straight from the basement to the atic, and floor and celling returns in each room (good practice for ventilation anyway.) And you should have no problem running plenum rated cable (fibre, cat5e whatever) through them.

    as an asside, if you plan on having 1 room in the house with most of your equipment, add extra registers to get more Cooling in summer and dont forget about fans in the ducts to improve air circulation)

  23. As a certified electrician... by dfeldman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have pulled cable in several new construction projects and I have a few tips that will save you a lot of headaches in the future:
    • Run conduit. Big conduit. There's a lot of space between your walls so why not leave yourself the room you will need to expand later?
    • You can buy 25-pair (!) Cat5e cable. It costs about twice as much as 4-pair but it is well worth it for expansion reasons. There's not a whole lot you can't do with 25 pairs.
    • Don't forget to buy plenum wiring, which does not emit toxic fumes when it burns. It's probably code in your area. I have seen bean counting managers cheap out and buy generic cable, and get fined thou$ands of dollars for it.
    • Coax isn't a bad idea, especially in a residential installation. You never know when you will want cable/DSS in a room.
    • Run a string between any two points where it makes sense, and mark the strings so you know what you're pulling later.
    • Don't bother with fiber. It is overpriced and will remain so for quite a while. Copper is good enough for gigabit ethernet and will provide all the bandwidth you need (within one building at least) for a very long time to come.

    Good luck with the project!

    df
    1. Re:As a certified electrician... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Don't forget to buy plenum wiring, which does not emit toxic fumes when it burns. It's probably code in your area.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought plenum wiring was only required in airspaces. I though wiring enclosed in conduit did not have to be plenum-rated to meet code.

    2. Re:As a certified electrician... by dgou · · Score: 4, Insightful
      My SO, a data wrangler from a local university says:

      Great list. Esp. marking the strings, you'll really want to know what is where.
      25 pair sounds cool, however it is a termination nightmare unless you're just going to use it specifically from point to point as your major house backbone and have it premade and preterminated for your situation. If you terminate it yourself you might be able to maintain 100Mb, but likely not and certainly not Gig. Unless there is a whole new 25 pair solution out there. Big conduit to run a plethora of different cables (except power of course) is a more general solution.

      I would also add that you want more than one outlet per room. Depending on your builder, it could be something that you'd have to octopus up (or down) from a central point, or you might be able to run in between the floor boards to get opposite wall coverage (or three or four wall coverage depending on your layout.

      One thing is for sure, there is never enough bandwidth, and you don't know what you'll want to run in the future.

      The house I bought was already built, and has pathetic insulation which is not easily fixed. I'm planning on moving the "server farm" and "main hub" between the attic (in winter) and somewhere lower in the house in summer.

      Consider also that where-ever you've picked for your central hub might become ideal for something else (kid's attic room, enclosed hot tub in basement, whatever), and since its so easy now, I would be inclined to run the conduit so you could have two (or maybe three, depending on the structure of your house) alternative spots.

      It might also be cool to run a room or three with a few extra outlets for gaming/multimedia/"record"-making/"movie"-making parties, efforts, etc. (I'm thinking of "Duality" ((Lost the URL, darn!)).

  24. Wireless is to secure networking... by ColGraff · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...as running through the street naked singing "I'm a little teapot, short and stout" is to modesty and sanity.

    No offense, but even the best wireless security solution can't compare to having an actual cat5 cable you can control access to.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  25. Run Cat 5 but... by Codifex+Maximus · · Score: 3, Informative

    don't secure the wire to the studs in the wall. That way whenever fiber is more prevalent, you can use the Cat5 to pull the fiber down into the wall from the attic.

    Pull the Cat 5 to a central place down inside your house - locate your router/hub there - maybe even your home server.

    Think about providing excellent grounding and maybe even heatsink capability to your server closet. Run a separate breakered power to the server closet.

    Run coaxial cable for TV - double shielded - to each room and have it go either to the attic for split or better yet have them terminate at the power mast outside the house - leave plenty of extra cable.

    Wire your house for security prior to putting in the insulation - insulation and sheetrock guys just love to cut wires that are in their way. :/

    --
    Codifex Maximus ~ In search of... a shorter sig.
  26. Re:Ducts - Air Handling Space by TheDancer · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're gonna put it in ducts--even in a single dwelling residential--check your local codes. They may require you to use plenum. Most business codes (and either the NEC or the TIA/EIA-568-A can't remember which one) requires that for offices cable installed in ducts must be plenum rated and installed in conduit inside the ducts.

    The danger is non-plenum cable gives off a lot of smoke while burning, if the cable is in the ducts this can quickly spread the smoke to areas that aren't on fire and hinder peoples escape from the building.

    Fire codes are basically designed to do two things, 1) slow down the spread of a fire 2) make it easy for people to escape. And if you can't see, you can't get out (so the theory goes), that's why plenum is sometimes required. (plus non-plenum burning vapours tend to create a strong acid when mixed with water, iirc).

    Long and short, always check your codes.

    Bryan

  27. Upgradability - conduits by standards · · Score: 2

    It's hard to predict what you'll want to run between your walls in the future. Technology changes every few years - but house ownership can last for decades.

    The key is to install conduit between key locations in your house. It usually isn't that hard to run cables between the basement and the first floor, or from the attic to the second floor. But it can be a big effort to run a wire from the basement to the 2nd floor. Or to get a cable to a location where it isn't accessible from the attic or the basement.

    When I had my house built, I installed a conduit from the wiring panel in the basement all the way up to the attic, with access points on the first and second floors. I also installed a conduit behind two bedroom walls on the second floor - walls which are diffcult to get behind without a lot of demolition.

    Now if I want to bring in a new fiber or CATV or doorbell, it's very easy to draw the cable from the basement to the attic, and it's easy to cleanly distribute the cable to any room in the house.

    My only mistake was a lack of a conduit between my house and detached garage.

  28. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by Maktoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Oh, I just thought of something.

    It will be a little more expensive, but you might want to think about stringing "STP" CAT5, instead of UTP... that's Shielded Twisted Pair instead of Unshielded.

    STP is what is plenum graded, so that it doesn't catch fire as easily. Also, it's better shielded against interference from other electrical sources that might be in the wall.

    It's not a requirement or anything... but it might be worth considering simply for safety reasons.

  29. I just did this... by pherret · · Score: 3, Informative

    My father was building his new house and wanted it "wired for the future". My brother and I were to develop his idea and install it (after the electrician and before the drywall).

    We decided that is wasn't practical to run fiber. How much speed to really think you will need? How much faster can a home user get? Even if the broadband ISPs upgrade their system to allow anything faster than a maximum of 10mbps...are you _REALLY_ going to need that?

    If you are concerned about the speed in your home area network, then just make sure your network equipment is 100meg...that should be more than plenty for every person in those six rooms to be swapping high-quality multimedia back and forth.

    The point is, fiber really isn't for the home user...it's more for other intensive bandwidth situations. What I can definately recommend is that if you can afford it and it won't break your budget...then by all means go for it!

    However, if it _will_ break your budget, or you want to spend that money on a bunch of X-10 equipment for a semi-Jetson-type house, then run conduit and pull strings. So if you ever get the cash or get the itch to install fiber, all you gotta do is attach it to a pull string and go...it will slide nicely through conduit.

    As for the phone and other stuff...just run Cat-5 all the way through. You can use it for phone and sound (maybe other things). If you want video, just run a coax to each room and get a fancy distribution panel to manage all this neat stuff. I wouldn't recommend running S-Video throughout. Have you ever bought a 6-foot s-video cable? They are expensive. Coax does its job just fine. Make sure you run the high quality stuff.

    Of course, if you run fiber you can pipe it all through the same wire, but each room will need an EXPENSIVE thingy to split all signals to the designated device.

    1. Re:I just did this... by BIGJIMSLATE · · Score: 2

      "Even if the broadband ISPs upgrade their system to allow anything faster than a maximum of 10mbps...are you _REALLY_ going to need that?"

      EXACTLY! You my friend, are just as good as predicting the future as my friend Bill Gates, who told me that I will never need more than 640k of ram...

  30. Re:On the other hand... by ChazeFroy · · Score: 2

    A more expensive alternative is to put PVC piping in the walls and run the cables through it. It wouldn't be as ugly as having the cables on the outside, and you can easily upgrade. I am considering to do this when I build my house in the next 1-2 years.

    Of course the major drawback is the expense of the PVC piping.

  31. House Wiring by oldzoot · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wired my own house a few years ago.

    Here is some advice based on what I did. Note that I was at the time a licensed communications wiring contractor, so the house is wired a litte more than perhaps is usefull, but here goes.

    1. Put muliple locations in each room. I put to faceplates in each bedroom, typically near a corner and opposite each other ( diagaonally opposite corners ) a cable from the outlet can be run along either adjacent wall for convienience in locating phones or computers. In each outlet are two cat 5 data cables and 1 4pair telephone cable. In one of the two outlets is an RG6 CATV cable.

    2. Home run telephone wires - I ran all the telephone cables directly from the outlet to a telephone junction box in the garage which was mounted directly above the one from the phone company. The phone company box faces outside, mine faces inside and there are some holes in the 2X4 seperating them for cables to run through. I mounte 4 type 66 punchblocks in the inside box and terminated all 32 cables there. All multiple jumpering etc. is done in that box.

    I ran all the data wiring ( 48 cables ) to 4 dual gang boxes inside the master bedroom closet. Using ortronics IMO2 dual gang faceplates with 6 double port modules, I got 48 ports in the 4 outlets and its is not cludgy like a patchpanel on a swingout door would be- it has a finished look. I also got the electrician to put a utility outlet inside the closet close to the ports to power the switch and localtalk bridge.

    3. Put a telephone outlet near your CATV outlets - if you want to use satellite tv or some other service which requires a telephone connection it will be very good to have.

    4. Put data outlets in common rooms - the livingroom, dining room den etc. These areas could end up as common homework computer areas for the kids. I have a table in the living room and one in the dining room ( we eat in the kitchen ) with some older computers on them that the kids use for homework.

    Note that the contractors installers may be very helpful if you offer a 6 pack or two of beer to help grease the skids. I got all kinds of built-in bookshelves, nooks and other cool customizations this way.

    Another suggestion !! Put in the return line for a circulating hot-water system during construction. If you can not afford the pump now, you can add it later, but it is a pain to put the return line in.

    Also consider insulating hot water lines and putting insulation inside the inner walls to give some soundproofing.

    Good Luck

    Zoot

    --
    enough is too much
  32. Re:Yes. by antadam · · Score: 3, Informative

    not really...if you're happy w/cat 5e run that...if everything is through the walls and you ever want to change the type of wire, just pull out the cat 5e and hook the new fiber to the one end of the cat 5e when you pull it out. everything is already strung then.

  33. Re:Running wires/fiber etc... by Rozpoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    I always found it easier to just find the cable lines. Because they are pretty much in every room, you can just tie the cat5 wire to the cable line along with some string. Go up to your attic and just pull the whole thing up, then untie the cat5 wire and pull the cable back down with the string. They even sell face plates with both an ethernet port and place for the tv cable. That way you dont have to put more holes in the wall. Just a lot easier in my opinion.

  34. CAT-7 by robertchin · · Score: 2

    I don't see anyone that's mentioned it yet, but you should probably run CAT-7 for gigabit ethernet speeds. I agree that most gigabit ethernet equipment is expensive at the moment, but prices will no doubt fall soon (New G4 macs come with gigabit ethernet, including the G4 Powerbook (!) ). Gigabit ethernet is the future as far as home use. Fiber is a pain, CAT-7 is a copper wire so you should be able to make your own connectors. I'm not sure what the price point currently is on CAT-7.

    1. Re:CAT-7 by robertchin · · Score: 2

      One CAT-7 patch cable supplier, conforms to the CAT-7 proposal. Perhaps the proposal is finalized, but you can buy cable conforming to the proposal. This way you're guaranteed expandability. Price is always a factor when trying to stay on the cutting edge =)

  35. Free as aether by fm6 · · Score: 2
    I like wireless, but I wouldn't use it if there's an affordable and convenient alternative. Why deal with the extra cost and security hassles if you don't need to?

    And wireless only gives you 11 megabits, as opposed to 100 megabits for wired ethernet. And that assumes there are no neighbors emiting local packets for you to collide with.

    It's curious that everybody assumes that, except for the cost of the transceivers, that wireless bandwith is free and unlimited. There's only so much radio spectrum to go around, and we're already running short, even without 3G cells and ubiquitous community nets.

  36. My experiences in wiring a new house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative
    I recently wired a new house. Here's my experiences with it.

    I wired the house with cable and two CAT5e cables to each telephone housing, plus security and some audio cabling to a few select areas. I also set up the internal vacuum system.

    Do Not, I repeat, DO NOT wire anything before the electrician has wired for power. Plan with the electrician so that you can make sure your wire is at least 1 foot, preferably 2 feet away from his wire when running in parallel, and otherwise crosses at oblique (near to 90 degrees) angles. Master electricians are smart, but the workers they employ are morons. We had to yank out a lot of wiring because the electricians laid power cable in all sorts of unfortunate places right next to ours. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED.

    Do nail in wire protector plates onto wood just like your electrician does for the power cables. They're to keep the drywallers from wrecking your wiring with their drywall nails.

    Do consider running a little conduit, but only a little. Don't conduit the whole thing: what we wound up doing was running conduit from the basement up to the attic. The house is two-story. That way if we absolutely had to, we could wire things in the future without massive rebuilding.

    Do run everything (phone, cable, network, fiber) in a star configuration to a central hub.

    Do do both the telephone and networking and cable yourself. It's simple. Don't pay the electrician to wire for telephone if you're going to wire for networking; you're just wasting money.

    Do Not use plenum, braided, or shielded CAT5e cable. Plenum cable has basically one use: to be run through air ducts in old office buildings as a fire precaution. Shielded CAT5e will turn your network into an antenna if not properly grounded. In general, you don't need it unless you're running along with lots of electrical lines in close conduit areas. Braided cable is only for patch-cord use.

    Do consider the new combination cable available, which has fiber, cable, CAT5e, low-power DC, and audio all in one bundle. But it's a pain to wire because it has to be bent at very gradual angles. Might be a good way to go though, and cheaper.

    Do not expect that security is wired in a similar fashion. In particular, 4-wire smoke detectors cannot be wired in a star configuration at all: they must be wired in a specific, unusual serial topology.

    Do remember that your hub must be in a locked area.

    1. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Tuzanor · · Score: 2
      Do Not use plenum, braided, or shielded CAT5e cable

      agreed. If you really want high quality cables just go with enhanced twisted pair...

    2. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by WNight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here's a little advice for you. Since you obviously hate Slashdot, don't use it. It's really easy. (See .sig)

      As for the cable... Plenum rated cable is rarely required in the walls, it's usually only required in plenums, hence the name.

      The safety benefits, in the wall, are very debatable. The whole point of it is to avoid filling the airways of a large building with potentially toxic smoke from a distant fire. In a home, by the time smoke escapes from the cabling in the walls you've got much worse problems.

      If you have the money to burn, go ahead and install it, it's not going to cause any problems.

      But, if you're really looking for safety, spend the difference on better (or more) smoke detectors, or CO detectors, or Radon detectors, etc, etc.

      And as for the AC... Personally I'd rather trust an AC who said something sensible enough to get modded up rather than trusting you, a blantant troll and karma whore. Especially considering as how the AC was right and you were very wrong.

    3. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by WNight · · Score: 2

      It's really a chuckle, but despite the similarity of "WhiteNight" and "DarkWhite", they aren't the same person.

      I'm much more handsome and articulate.

      If it panics you to no end, get the admins to check IPs.

    4. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by WNight · · Score: 2
      What's the correlation between saying something sensible and getting modded up, Sparky? Herd mindset again: popular, therefore good.


      If a factual post, containing no blatant karma whoring, gets modded up five times (from 0) it's often an indicator that it's worth reading, even if not perfect. All in all, the high score on that post was proof of the success of the system (if only this once).

      Here's a little advice for you: don't jump to conclusions. If I hated Slashdot I wouldn't be here at all; ergo, since I am here, I do not hate Slashdot.


      Sorry, I was just assuming you weren't nuts. I mean, if most people insult things, they dislike them. I see you're one of those "unique" people who insults things they like. Clever strategy.

      I do, however, harbor a strong dislike for the herd members such as yourself who can't distinguish an informed opinion from utter BS, let alone form such an opinion for themselves, and who drown out reasoned debate with their bleating.


      Ahh yes. The only way I could possibly support the AC over you, despite him being completely correct and you being wrong and a jackass, is if I'm a herd member. Silly me, I thought I just disliked you because you were a rude and stupid; I didn't know it was "in" to bash you.
    5. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by autocracy · · Score: 2
      Salamander - the symbol from Farenheit 451. Symbol for flames...

      And dot dot dot. He was correct - plenum rated cable is rated for *plenums*. Plenums are air ducts. Plenum cable will still burn. If you have cable burning in your walls, you shouldn't be around to deal with the fumes. By the time they reach you in enough concentration to cause anything beyond a gag reflex, you're probably already dead. Now, if you want to run in through your central heat/cooling ducts, that is a different story. Same with in a lot of false ceilings in office buildings. Know before you post. Admit when you're wrong, because you will be wrong at least once.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    6. Re:My experiences in wiring a new house by Salamander · · Score: 2
      Salamander - the symbol from Farenheit 451. Symbol for flames...

      The origin of my name here actually goes back a lot further than Ray Bradbury. In ancient times salamanders were noted not so much for starting fires but for resisting their effects. I chose the name because - contrary to claims of karma whoring - even when I first registered I could tell that this was a place there are plenty of flames to go around and independent thinkers will get even more than their share.

      BTW, I do admit that I was wrong about plenum cable in homes. No problem. I'll even apologize for the original AC wisecrack. Good luck getting any of the other participants on either side of this stupid "conversation" to show even that much contrition for their even more absurd claims or behavior - "hate Slashdot", "astroturf", "make me sick", etc.

      My point about WNight jumping to conclusions or having undue faith in the moderation system still stand, however. I've had a couple of dozen posts modded up to five in the past and I metamoderate almost every weekday, so I know damn well how frivolously mod points are often awarded. I've also been hounded by ACs after my more controversial posts enough times to have an instinctive dislike of the breed. Stick around for a while, consistently speak your own mind instead of someone else's, and see if you don't get pretty annoyed yourself at ACs or the other ovine members of the Slashdot non-community.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  37. Forget fiber ... conduits w/ CAT5 and 802.11 by Doctor+K · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just bought a house and instead of wiring it up, I just use 802.11b for the bedroom computers. However, my 802.11b access point / firewall also has a switched hub, so my workstations are hooked up with CAT5. This is more than fast enough for any kind of internet connection you are likely to get in the near future.

    Don't listen to the ... ahem ... "experts" telling you to install fiber. In my day job, I work in research on fiber optics technology (mostly for 40 Gb/s+ DWDM long haul and metro networks). Fiber equipment that I am familar with is not made for the consumer market.

    Would you even know what types of fiber to buy? (multi-mode / single-mode, C-band / L-band / Extended-L band, ...) Or what kind of connectors you would need? Or do you have the access to the equipment necessary to splice fibers (it's not cheap to do it right)? Do you know what kinds of equipment to attach to the end of the fiber (modulators, switches, splitters, NICs ...)? And exactly what are you going to hook up that requires fiber's speed?

    If you are worried about an upgrade path, the smart thing to do is install conduits. When fiber goes to the consumer market, you will be ready.

    Kevin

    1. Re:Forget fiber ... conduits w/ CAT5 and 802.11 by Tuzanor · · Score: 2
      Would you even know what types of fiber to buy? (multi-mode / single-mode, C-band / L-band / Extended-L band, ...) Or what kind of connectors you would need?

      Of course you're not going to use singlemode fiber around your home. That shit is made for extremely fast long haul (10+ km) and the conectors are very bitchy to set up (you need a microscope) as they need to be lined up perfecty. Most fiber that is used for internal use is multimode and is more than adaquate for most applications. It is cheap and fast (for LAN/WAN use).

      Fiber equipment that I am familar with is not made for the consumer market.

      This is somewhat true. It depends how you look at it. There is fiber running from a lot of DVD players to Dolby 5.1 systems. Most new Cisco switches and routers have fiber "uplink" ports for clustering and uplinking...though those aren't meant for "consumer" use. Then again most slashdot users probably aren't your typical computer consumers and many of use have several computers running doing different things.

      I am planning on getting a Catalyst 3524 Xl. That is a 24 port 10/100 switch with 2 GBIC-Based fiber ports. They aren't cheap new, but you can get them for about $1500 used on ebay if you are patient enough to wait and get lucky.

    2. Re:Forget fiber ... conduits w/ CAT5 and 802.11 by Doctor+K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The CD player I bought in 1996 had "fiber optic" outputs. (It was a high end model and I still haven't seen a consumer D/A converter with comparable specs.) And now in 2001, the fiber optic output is still unused. A/V equipment with fiber optic output is nothing new. Even before then, the security system at the electronics store I worked at in high school (circa 1993) consisted of a "fiber optic" loop. A red-LED would send a pulse every through the cable every second (you could see it looking at the fiber end-on). If the cable was broken, the pulse wouldn't be received and thus you would know that somebody was trying to walk off with a floor model.

      However, in both these applications the type of cabling and what not is not what people usually think of when they are talk about fiber optics (hence the quotation marks). In both applications, you are only moving the signal a couple of feet and the signal has very low bandwidth. As a result, you can get away with a lot of slop and do most of the implementation with plastic fibers, normal LEDs and no fancy couplers.

      If you want to talk moderate bandwidth computer use (1 Mb/s - 100 Mb/s), I can't think of any advantages of fiber over CAT5 and wireless (except possibly EMI). All I can see are drawbacks (price, fickle connectors, comparatively little support ... ).

      If you are talking high bandwidth (over 1 Gb/s), then you want to consider fiber. However, I would like to know what a home user is doing that needs 1 Gb/s. Someday, users might be running multi-Gb/s home networks. When that happens, I don't expect a DVD optic patch cable to be up to snuff. Furthermore, I don't expect multi-Gb/s home networks to happen before this guy sells his home anyways (5 years is the rule of thumb used by real estate agents).

      So why spend the money laying fiber when:

      - CAT5 and wireless are good enough for the foreseeable future.

      - Standards for fiber home networks are practically non-existant such that picking the right underlying technology becomes a gamble.

      - The home's resale value is better enhanced with conduits.

      Kevin

    3. Re:Forget fiber ... conduits w/ CAT5 and 802.11 by autocracy · · Score: 2

      He's in a house. He'll use multi-mode, because it's cheap(er). You aren't familiar with the equipment he'd have because he's talking gigabit - as in one, not forty. He'll use it for a LAN. And thanks for sharing all the information that was way over the top of the topic.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    4. Re:Forget fiber ... conduits w/ CAT5 and 802.11 by autocracy · · Score: 2

      However, before you and the rest of /. think(s) I'm an asshole for my response to your original post - yes. This is said well...

      --
      SIG: HUP
  38. A hole in Cambridge by Tim+Ward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everyone is telling you to put conduit in ... this reminds me:

    The Cambridge University Computing Service, several years back, wanted to run a network round the city to connect to various University departments, colleges etc. To pay fo this they had to persuade all these bodies to cough up a significant amount of money as their share of the capital costs.

    Trouble was that people thought they were being asked to pay for high-tech stuff which would go out of date in a few years, so the marketing job was to persuade them that they were actually being asked to pay for an extremely low tech hole in the ground, through which any appropriate type of cable could easily and cheaply be drawn in years to come.

    This worked. The hole got built.

    1. Re:A hole in Cambridge by mpe · · Score: 2

      Trouble was that people thought they were being asked to pay for high-tech stuff which would go out of date in a few years, so the marketing job was to persuade them that they were actually being asked to pay for an extremely low tech hole in the ground, through which any appropriate type of cable could easily and cheaply be drawn in years to come.

      Low tech trenchs can be very expensive. Especially where they have to cross cities. Once you have accounted for getting appropriate permissions and paperwork, doing the dig and reinstating the surface actually paying for the conduit and cable is the cheap bit.

  39. Re:Hmm... by isorox · · Score: 2

    If you spend $100,000 on a house, whats wrong with adding another $500 for wiring (and $1500 for a 52" tv ;) - doesnt make much of a difference in the long run.

  40. 25 pairs... by fm6 · · Score: 2
    There's not a whole lot you can't do with 25 pairs.
    Oh Lord. You're right, of course. But putting that much capacity into a residential network still boggles my mind.
    1. Re:25 pairs... by fm6 · · Score: 2

      True, but bandwidth is another issue. You'd need special hardware to concentrate and deconcentrate 25 data streams at each access point. (I guess a standard router would do, but those aren't cheap -- or small.) I think fibre actually would be cheaper in that case!

  41. Re:Problem with Fiber (almost forgot this) by uberdave · · Score: 4, Informative

    That kind of signal loss is going to be insignificant. The real problem with bending fiber around corners, is that the strands are somewhat fragile. I've seen runs of fiber that had to be doubled because some of fibers the first one had broken when the cable was bent too sharply. The best thing with fiber is conduit, because it gives smooth rounded corners.

  42. Your code may vary by fm6 · · Score: 2

    And besides, toxic fumes are toxic fumes, even if they're legal!

    1. Re:Your code may vary by fm6 · · Score: 2

      Yep, and the Titanic didn't sink very often either!

  43. I just did this by renehollan · · Score: 5, Informative
    Well, worse: I bought a house already built.

    I ended up running 2 runs of Cat5e and 2 runs of quad-shielded RG-6 to 6 drops.

    You will want the coax... trust me. While I'd like to run everythng over UTP or fiber, the costs of locating things like VCRs, and satellite receivers at a head end, and streaming video digitally are prohibitive compared to the costs of running the coax. You may want to plan for the day when everything is streamed over IP and carried on an ethernet or fiber physical layer, but I think it is far better to have dead cable in the wall than to use horribly expensive equipment today as opposed to your neighbor who just hooks up the new TV to the cable outlet and is done.

    Fiber. I didn't run any, but mostly because of the cost -- it's still too expensive. Also, don't forget headend terminations for all those fiber lines -- they are expensive. If you can afford it, by all means. In my case, I figure I'll sell the house and build a new one before I have a real pressing need for fiber: am I really going to want to stream full-resolution uncompressed video room to room? I doubt it.

    Do put in as many drops as you think you'll need, and then some. You have an advantage over me: your walls aren't up yet. Plan for a minimum of one per room, more if there are multiple entrances. For example, many central family rooms open up to formal dining/living rooms and kitchen -- place the outlet on the "wrong" wall and you'll have to snake a cable across an entryway... not cool.

    If you can afford the cabling, make EACH 110VAC outlet have a co-located (but not sharing the box-- that violates code) coax/data drop. That's excessive, and you immediately have to separate the AC and other cables to avoid interference, but you'll have a drop whereever you need one. Personally, I'd probably stick with one outlet per continuous wall segment, more for bigger rooms.

    I ran 2xCat5e and 2xRG-6 (quad-shielded). You can get combo cable (speedwrap) that contains this (with or without fiber) in a single jacket that makes for easy pulling, but expect to pay double over individual cables. If you're paying for installation, the reduced labour might pay for the more expensive cable. Note: the reason for two runs of coax is in case you want to run a video stream back to the headend, like, perhaps a baby monitor camera. However, with recent PVR having TWO tuners, you'll find you need to use both coax cables, espescially with satellite systems (the receiver sends a signal selecting satellite and polarization to the multiswitch over the coax -- you don't have all channels on the cable at once). If you want to do this and send video back to the headend you may need three coax cables.. though a cheap PC and webcam might do the trick over the Cat5-e instead (and I can think of creative uses of satellite diplexers to use two coaxes for two satellite signals, one cable/off air signal, and a backfeed, but I haven't tried it).

    As for plugging phones into RJ-45s... why bother? Just terminate one of the Cat5e cables in an RJ-14 jack, leaving one pair not connected... you can have up to three lines on that RJ-14. Alternately, split it out in the box to two RJ-14s. You can always require for ethernet later, if you have to (or use a PBX that requires 8 wires). This also ensures that you don't accidently plug the phone in the wrong outlet (confusing the coax ports is bad enough).

    I'd post more, but have to go.

    --
    You could've hired me.
    1. Re:I just did this by renehollan · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah! There's nothing quite like straddling the ceiling joists above the family room (you know, the one with the 12 foot ceiling), holding on to a wall stud, and drilling through a top plate.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    2. Re:I just did this by Tiroth · · Score: 2

      Actually you can run video quite effectively over just STP (or even UTP) if you turn it into a differential signal. This is probably not worth doing through unless you build the converters yourself, but it is a cheap solution for people who have unused twisted pairs.

    3. Re:I just did this by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Yeah, and I looked into this as an option, but (a) converters are expensive, (b) building them yourself might be fun, but takes time (something I have little of (sigh)), (c) it requires all your RF equipment at the headend.

      Often you want to distribute component video, so you need three pairs, and a digital audio signal (oops, another pair). You can't take advantage of multi-tuner capabilities of modern TV sets, 'cause you don't have a broadband feed.

      I came to the conclusion that it's best to pull the coax for "legacy" equipment, and if I ever wanted to transmit video over IP, I'd use MPEG2 encoders -- they're no longer insanely priced and I expect them to become cheaper as time goes on.

      Now, if your cable is already run, and you need that extra composite or svideo signal, and you've got a spare pair or two, by all means, use them.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    4. Re:I just did this by renehollan · · Score: 2
      Yeah, I didn't want to run a bunch of different cable, but RG-6 was most practical. Believe me, I was thinking of all sorts of ways to use Cat5e for digital audio (doable on one pair) and component video (balun-ed on the other three), but the result is an ugly hack, permits only one video signal to a destination, and analog. Sending the baseband satellite feed on a coax, at least lets the receiver in each room decode a digital signal (albeit compressed).

      And no, I would certainly not transcode a digital satellite feed -- you're right about the cascading errors. I just put the damn baseband feed from the multiswitch on the coax and be done with it.

      Now, there are some interesting terrestrial HDTV decoder cards for PCs that provide an MPEG2 stream (either encoded off-line, or real-time with decent equipment (i.e. for live programming)) -- I think Telemann makes one for around US$400. A couple of these at the headend to permit streamed MPEG2-compressed HDTV over IP on the ethernet would be cool.

      It is very seductive to want GigE and headend sources that can provide as much switched digital audio and video as each room can handle, and do away with the coax. But we "ain't there yet".

      Also, once you start doing things like PIP (picture in picture) at the receiver in each room, you suddenly realize that you don't need all the streams to be full-resolution, certainly not the PIP stream... it would make more sense for it to be downsampled in real time before being sent to the remote room.

      It looks like what you want is a digital stream over 100 Mb/s ethernet or GigE (you did run Cat5e, right?) demodulated from whatever source (terrestrial HDTV, satellite, etc.) at the headend, with a resolution negotiated between equipment in each room and the headend demodulator. So, you could get a full-res main stream, and a 1/4 res PIP.

      D1 over GigE? I suppose it is possible.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  44. Plenum Rated and other tips. by tercero · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did this to my house last year.

    If you go the Cat5e route, be absolutely certain to pay the extra few bucks to get Plenum rated cable instead of PVC. Plenum rated cable won't put off toxic fumes if it catches fire. Also, your local fire marshall will love you.

    I recommend running wire, the night that only one side of the drywall is placed, this way you have something to anchor it to and get a reference of where your plugs are and need to be.

    Phone cables now are typically Cat5 or Cat5e. Don't use them unless you must, crosstalk can be bad.

    Lastly run 2 cables everywhere a computer can fit. Do you want an automated house in the future? Plan now! Maybe you don't but when you sell the house do you want that as a selling point? HTH

  45. Re:On the other hand... by FFFish · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or find a wrecking site for some old store or school, and see if you can nip the old conduit. Cheap as anything. Probably EM proof, too!

    Don't forget to also wire for sound and cable. You should have shielded speaker/audio/video cable running all over the place, and the old cable company television cable, too.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  46. Re:On the other hand... by FFFish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Oh, and now's the time to get the electrician to drop a loop down to a box every fourth stud or so. You *can* *not* have too many electrical boxes ready to be used.

    Make sure you have an accurate map of their placement. Then let the sheetrock guys cover 'em up: most of the boxes will go unused. But the day you desperately need an outlet *right there,* you'll be eversothankful you had the foresight to have a hidden box ready to go...

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  47. Building Codes by eander315 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Be aware that building codes may prohibit you from doing any of this. Most likely you'll be fine, but I would check first.

    Secondly, make sure you're using the right kind of cat-5 for the job. PVC type is cheaper, but is less resistant to heat and can cause noxious fumes if burned. Plenum type insulation is more resistant to heat, and is certified for use in air ducts because it doesn't produce the fumes that PVC will. Unfortunately, Plenum is more expensive. In any case, keep track of heat sources when you're wiring. The fireplace and oven, for instance, may cause you problems if you run cable right behind them.

    You may want to run 2 different colors of cat-5, one for voice and one for data. Cat-5 can handle up to 4 voice lines through one cable. In any case, make sure you label everything.

    Finally, don't forget to run coax (as well as any other cables you may need for ANYTHING, such as speaker cable, RCA, etc.), as you may need to add a TV or cable modem connection. No one likes having their cable modem sitting on the TV. e

  48. Don't forget to run the conduit vertically by coyote-san · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One other point is that conduit pipes should be run vertically. Running a 2" pipe through all of your wall studs is a Bad Idea, but running such a pipe vertically is another matter entirely. It also makes it easier to install the insulation. (You want insulation on interior walls for the sound proofing. A little money now will save a lot of headaches when your kids are teenagers.)

    You also want a large pipe that's a straight shot from attic to basement/crawlspace.

    The idea is that you have good access in attic and basement/crawlspace, so they don't need special treatments. But walls are a real pain once they're sealed, so you want to keep it as simple as possible. And nothing is simplier than a large vertical pipe with no bends in it. Even if the pipe is completely empty (e.g., you sealed in a few extra pipes "just in case"), you can pull a line with nothing but a string and a lead weight.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:Don't forget to run the conduit vertically by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      You also want a large pipe that's a straight shot from attic to basement/crawlspace

      Additionally, you want something like a bike hook ($.50 at Home Depot) by the top of the pipe to loop wire runs around. 20 feet of 4 to 8 cat5 cables weigh a fair amount and they want to fall back down the pipe.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
  49. Re:On the other hand... by FFFish · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Arrrgh. Another thing!

    Run some beefy nylon string through the studs. This will give you the opportunity to pull cable in the future. Use separate holes, and smooth off the edges so that the chances of snagging are reduced.

    (This, if you don't do the conduiting.)

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  50. Use CAT5e and you have flexibility by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 2, Informative

    I am preparing to build my own house as well and have been looking at this very issue.

    What I have decided was to run 6+ normal CAT5e wires to each room. This may seem like a lot but... Comready.com has 1000' spools for 40+$ so price is not that great of an issue.

    Now for the secret ingredients. First of all.. For network just use 1 or more standard CAT5e cables to do that in each room. You can then run up to 4 phone lines on another CAT5e cable. You then have 3 left.

    Milestek.com has cat5 baluns that let you transmit everything from S-video to Broadband Video in case you ever want video in any room.

    That also leaves a couple cables free for intercoms and such.

    If you want to lessen the cable runs or hook more things up in each room in the future you get something like the NJ-100 that we saw the article on slashdot about a couple weeks ago.

    Happy home hacking!

    --
    Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
  51. Re:On the other hand... by mmaddox · · Score: 4, Redundant

    Ignore these ranting loonies...

    Wire what you WANT, and then add an extra run to your office, your wife's office, and behind your televisions. Don't forget the kitchen.

    My new house was completed last April, and I've got 5e drops (2 or more per room) with a 100M switch in the "wiring closet" - an extra room in our attic. We considered fiber, too, but realized that fiber connections are just the flakiest things in the world. They're expensive, unreliable, and a downright pain, plus, it seems unlikely that we're going to be seeing anything faster than Gig-E anytime soon, so we're all set.

    If, by some weird occurrence, fiber becomes standard sometime in the future, I can pull the rooms by cutting and tying off my 5e from the attic. I will have removed the 5e and added the fiber at the same time. No sweat.

    More important than the cabling, make certain to get your primary computer room plugs on a different circuit from the rest of the room's circuit. THAT will come in handy. I have my office computer outlets and my wiring closet outlets on their own, separate circuits, and I don't feel too uncomfortable running what I want, now. Make sure you get extra outlets, too!

    --

    What'dya mean there's no BLINK tag!?

  52. Re:Yes. by lupetto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wires are so 20th century. If you're going to shell out the money, look into getting a good wireless network.

  53. 10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by SnapperHead · · Score: 2

    A big question to ask your self is are you running 10 or 100Mbit ? If your only running 10, your only using 5 wires out of the cat 5 cable. (Or is it 4) 100Mbit uses all of the cable. If your only running 10 (Which I couldn't understand, with 100Mbit cards so cheap these days) You can run the phone line inside of the same cable.

    Personally, I would run 2 cables in each room. Unless you have 2 offices. Think about it, with 100Mbit you can have a smaller hub in each room if you *REALLY* need it. Chances are, you won't be using that much bandwidth all day long.

    Plus, with the new 56Mbit wireless standard that was just released, I am not sure how many people will keep using cat5 cable across there house. I have my main machines running at 100Mbit (There in the same room), and everything else in the house is via wireless connection. Once I get IPSec working, it will be less of a hassle to worry about the security of the network :)

    At any rate, 2 in each room seems plenty for most home LANs. Unless you have 400 computers. My old house at 40 machines running 24/7, and 100Mbit was more or less required. (Don't ask :)

    --
    until (succeed) try { again(); }
    1. Re:10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      Kind of weak for a troll.

      both 10Mb and 100Mb use 4 wires. The difference is in the number of twists per meter as well as more stringent quality requirements. Anyway, there's really no reason to wire a new house with 10Mb; cable is cheap and so are switches.

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    2. Re:10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by TheDancer · · Score: 2, Informative

      10Base-T uses pins 1 2 3 and 6.
      100Base-TX uses pins 1 2 3 and 6.
      100Base-T4 uese all pins.

      100Base-T4 is a specification so that Category 3 cable can be used for 100Mbps speeds. Although you need special NICs and hubs to use 100Base-T4. It's not until you reach Gigabit (1000Base-T) that all four pairs are used. The actual standard allows for 1000Base-T over Cat-5, but most people reccomend Cat-5e. Although a Cat-5 installation must pass TSB-95 as issued by the TIA (A series of performance parameters above and beyond those in TSB-67).

      Bryan

    3. Re:10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by haruharaharu · · Score: 2

      There are plenty of people who still do [run 10Mb]

      Those are mostly existing installs. If there's no reason to upgrade, then why bother, right?

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    4. Re:10Mbit or 100Mbit ? by mpe · · Score: 2

      I could have swarn that 100Mbit used more then 4 wires.

      There are some old standards for 100M over cat 3 (and worst) which use all 4 pairs. (You'd also need special NICs and hubs to use them anyway).

  54. In 10 years everything will be wireless. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I guess fiber will always be faster but it seems like wireless will be the way to go. I'm sure they'll have good speeds by then.

    Of course, I wonder if sunspots will affect wireless internet?

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  55. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by dr_apoc · · Score: 3, Informative

    you can only go a few meters with Gigabit over Cat5e before attenuation takes effect. fiber doesnt have this limitation

  56. I just went through this... by cmeans · · Score: 2, Informative
    Put conduit in. One box per wall per room. Make sure you've got big enough pipes, an even distribution of the pipes through the walls, and a home-run room (or whatever they call it) where everything can come together nicely. (Ours is in the mud room.)

    That way you can change the cabling, and easily add more as the occasions arise.

    I have Cat5E running through-out the house. The only rooms I didn't wire were the bathrooms, and I already regret it.

  57. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by bmoyles · · Score: 2, Informative

    Plenum graded, iirc, actually means that were it to catch fire, its shielding and outer casing is made of a material that won't release toxic fumes into the airway (which often runs along the plenum--the space between the real ceiling and the drop ceilings found in many offices).

  58. I am part of a "smart home" wiring company by haledon · · Score: 2, Informative
    I'm part of a smart home wiring company (kind of a side-gig for me), and we do this kind of stuff all the time.

    Here is my suggestion: Get 4 boxes of Cat5e wiring, and tell your electrician to run all 4 bundles at once. NO phone, no fiber, no nothing else. You can (easily) use the Cat5e as phone wiring, and if you're going to pull cable, why not pull a bundle of 4, as opposed to a "bundle" of one.

    From there, you'll want to have someone (I don't know whether you feel comfortable doing it) set up a termination site at the home run, probably somewhere in the basement. That is where all your phone lines will converge, and any rack/patch panel system will go up.

    Now, if I were you, I'd have all 4 data drops wired with ports that can accept phone or data lines (RJ45 or RJ11 lines). You can get that kind of equipment from Home Depot.

    For ease of use, I would also suggest using 2 colors, when running your wire. Maybe, for example, red for the phone (which, remember, has the CAPABILITY to double as data, if you want), and white for all the data. That will make it easier to keep track of what is what later on.

    BTW, I would invest in a good cable crimper set, and a line-testing set as well. You can probably pick up both @ Home Depot, but I would suggest going to a local GrayBar if I were you.

    Now, with regard to cost, from our experience, doing the cabling before the dry wall goes up is about 1/3 to 1/4 as expensive as snaking wiring later on. Not only that, but it's also a MUCH, MUCH easier thing to do.

    I have seen a few comments regarding the running of other types of media.. that's really up to you. You might want to, at a minimum, run cable/audio, and speaker wiring. Again, if you're electrician is going to be running wire, it's just as simple to run a bundle of 4 wires as it is to run a bundle of 6 (4 data, 1 audio/video, 1 speaker.)

    If he trys to charge you more, tell him to get lost and just run the wiring yourself. If you take that route, then really, all you're looking at is an incremental cost of.. less than a few hundred bucks (relatvie to the cost of a new home, several hundred THOUSAND dollars), which is nothing, and a few hours of your time. The end result is a home with (theoretically) a higher value, since it's "wired and smart home ready".

    Now, regarding fiber... several home owners have asked us whether we would do fiber for them. The truth of the matter is that it's just too expensive for residential use. Not only that, but as a residential user, you likely won't need the power that fiber gives you. Your broadband connection will be the limiting factor, and I doubt that you'll be transferring files too large for standard Cat5e wiring to handle quickly. Not only that, but installing fiber requires more time, and is definitely not something the "do it yourselfer" should try.. not unless you've got a LOT of patience!

    On a side note.. as ironic as it would sound, the vast number of clients that our company takes on end up wiring the house... then installing a wireless network. Go figure.

    Either way, though, I would highly recommend running a bundle of data lines through the house. It's a solid investment.

    Please note that I have made it a point to leave my company's name out of this discussion. I wanted to make sure I came off as helpful, and not opportunistic. If you have any further questions, or want to know more, email me (jyamisha@hotmail.com) and I'll be more than happy to write more.

    --
    i want to live life, not just go through the motions
    1. Re:I am part of a "smart home" wiring company by renehollan · · Score: 2

      I just wish your company (and others in the biz) would bash on the heads of homebuilders. They are SOOO in the 1960s when it comes to prewiring, and the costs are insignificant compared to the rest of the house (yeah, I know they count every penny like auto manufacturers, but geez, ethernet to each room is practically a necessity today).

      --
      You could've hired me.
  59. Energy Management, Alarm, and other sensors by imrdkl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps going a bit off topic, but, one other thing to think about, before you sheetrock, is deployment of sensors for eventual energy management (smart-house) systems, and fire/burglar alarms and intrusion-avoidance systems. Typically, these systems require shielded 1 or 2 pair leads to analog boards which then convert to digital and feed the controller. Having these planned and at least the wire in place can save unsightly wires on the wall later.

  60. Re:On the other hand... by malfunct · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I would say in addition to this, put some conduit in for the network runs. I cant imagine trying to pull fiber through a run if it wasn't in conduit (I know how hard you have to yank that romex to get it to snake through all those terrible rough holes in studs, I spent far to much of my younger life remodeling with my dad).

    I think fiber at this point would be a poor idea because by the time you need it the standard will have changed. I know thats a problem in our current communications industry (the many miles of forever dark fiber).

    I do recommend running sound cables and cable tv cables all over, also maybe other sort of video cables.

    Also instead of duplicating runs, look into the possibility of switching wall plates. I saw them on some review site not long ago and they look like a great way to fake 4 connections into 1 wire run, though you are limited to always having those puppies on the same segment I guess.

    --

    "You can now flame me, I am full of love,"

  61. Re:Cost.... by webmaestro · · Score: 2, Informative

    ST, SC etc. are not cable types, they are the connectors. Also, Belden Multi-Mode zipcord (2 fibers, one RX one TX) can be had for $.23 a foot, not exactly expensive.

    The page you were looking at had patch cables, which ARE expensive, not bulk cable, which you would be running in this case. The connectors are expensive $3-8 each, but who said that he needs to terminate the fiber right now? You can check out bulk fiber here (Multimode) and the connectors here (ST) and here (SC), for later on. He's probably going to want to put in MultiMode fiber instead of SingleMode, because its more common, the equipment and fiber is less expensive, and because he probably doesn't need to make runs that are longer than a KM.

    If he (or you) want(s) to read up on the subject he can check out the Fiber University Lesson Plan.

  62. Re:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by isorox · · Score: 2

    At least in the UK, you dont have to be an electrition to wire anything you'll find in the home.

    I'd wait until you get the keys before putting in wiring though - perhaps ask the builders to put in a nice big cable duct system.

  63. Get an IBM Home Director Panel by tRoll+with+Butter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.homedirector.com/

    Use ALL CAT5 (no "standard" POTS lines) for phone and data, and RG-6 quadshield for satellite/cable TV connections. Have it all terminate at the Home Director box... Congradulations, you can now rewire any jack in the house to do whatever you want from one single location.

    This is how most of the new homes built in central FL are now wired.

    --

    ---
    Siggy, siggy, siggy, can't you see? Sometimes your puns just irritate me.
    1. Re:Get an IBM Home Director Panel by jjohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

      I built a house a year ago in Oak Creek, Wisconsin (just south of Milwaukee), and had it done by IBM Home Director. Four drops to each bedroom (1 RG6, 3 CAT5), two to the living room (RG6 and CAT5) and two to the kitchen (2 CAT5), all terminated in a box in the basement, with no POTS lines, and I'm totally happy.

      The Home Director panel houses my Time/Warner cable connection, which is both digital cable and RoadRunner, so my cable modem is in there, hooked up to a Linksys 8 port cable/dsl router (which provides DHCP to my network). The phone lines and cable lines terminate at simple splitters in the box; the network lines in the router.

      It's clean and nearly effortless. Plug a phone in, and it's set; plug a computer into a network port, and it's on the network with a proxyless broadband connection. When I built a room in the basement, I added six drops to it (RG6 and 5 CAT5) just as easily.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  64. You Don't *KNOW* What You Need. by dew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here's the straight-up truth. You don't know what you need 10 years from now! Neither does anybody else in this forum. 5 or 10 years down the pipe, you're going to want to drop in some new cabling/communications wiring, right? Maybe you will want to run audio/video cables through the walls like one poster suggested. But the point is not to NOW lay every single possible cable you'd want. What you want to do is to future-proof your house.

    In my opinion, the best way to do that is to use conduit. Conduit will let you easily drop in new cables to your house's framework. That way, just drop in your cat 5e and telephone wiring now, and then, as you need it, drop in other transport media.

    I might caution you as to using long-haul analog cabling media, like stereo RCA - long, straight wires make excellent antennas and the audio quality by the time it actually got to your speakers would be undoubtedly subpar. If you have the money, running something like optical S/PDIF would make more sense, as it's digital and won't lose signal quality over the kind of runs you're likely to have in your house.

    Good luck, and kudos on putting together a fabulous new home!

    --

    David E. Weekly
    Code / Think / Teach / Learn
    h4x0r for

  65. Something You might have overlooked by rveno1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    of Course it is a no brainer to wire your house with cat5e (in fact when my dad redid our house 8 years ago he made sure they installed cat5)

    But from another perspective AFTER you wire the house (and before the drywall is up) run through your house with a CAMCORDER and record where all the wires are placed this will become an invaluable resource when you have to do expansion!

    1. Re:Something You might have overlooked by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But from another perspective AFTER you wire the house (and before the drywall is up) run through your house with a CAMCORDER and record where all the wires are placed this will become an invaluable resource when you have to do expansion!

      No, don't use a camcorder. Use a camera (digital or film), get prints, and *organize them into a notebook*. Clearly label each page, ("Dining room, South") etc.. Make notes on each page as to what kinds of cable are where. Update the notebook after construction is complete as to what box is hooked to what cable.

      Hardcopy prints properly stored last for decades, and the specs on the MK1 eyeball won't change in that timeframe either. (Hardcopy notebooks can also be easily transferred to the next owner with no compatibility problems.)

  66. wireless + my experience. by psychalgia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    look, ive doen this to two differnet houses. Its going to cost you a LOT less to do wireless. Just take the plunge...that wired shit is going to be antiquated as hell in a few years.

    --

    ________________________________________________

  67. A few more cat5 suggestions by Spinality · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Lots of good comments here. I have nothing to add about the fiber/UTP question, other than it might be a little premature to drop fiber everywhere; but here are some other UTP notes from my experience:

    Consider using a modular connector system like this one. I saved a lot of time and hassle using them and the result looks great. You can also intermix CATV, voice, data etc. however you like.

    Use a star from a cable closet (could be a cabinet in your garage or next to the water heater, doesn't matter). Consider running everything to a patch panel. If you don't want to spring for the connectors etc. of a patch panel, at least create a 'virtual patch panel' where every circuit is tagged and accessible. Leave good documentation in the cabinet 'cause you'll forget what goes where.

    Follow the Cat5 specs: minimal bends, minimal tension when pulling cable, loose cable ties, no regular tie intervals, cross AC power perpendicularly and rarely. Pick the cabling spec you'll use and stick to it. Avoid doing what I had to do: running voice on the unused two pairs of my 100Mbs data circuits (even though I've had zero problems).

    Be sure you have power near your drops and plenty of power and some shelf space in your closet. You'll be terminating your outside internet connectivity here as well (DSL, cable modem, etc.) so be sure to plan space accordingly for routers, console connections, hubs, UPS, etc.

    See the remarks elsewhere here about using plenum cable if you're not installing conduit. But conduit would let you use fiber or other more advanced media in the future.

    Invest in some cheap test equipment so you can verify continuity, correct pinouts, etc. in all your cables.

    HTH -- Spiny

    --
    -- We all have enough strength to endure the misfortunes of other people. La Rochefoucauld
  68. Re:Cost vs. Future by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
    I've always thought that if I built a dream house, it would have a utility core that could access every room. Something like a 18-inch wide gap within the main central walls of the house that you could walk in. That way, I could route wires and install electronic equipment to my heart's content.

    Of course, the only proper entryway for something like this would be a button that makes a bookshelf swing open...

  69. Where are the Brazil panels? by michaelmalak · · Score: 2

    Why hasn't someone come out with a wall system like in the movie Brazil, where 2 ft square panels are removable? It would not only be good for wiring, but also for inserting surround speakers and hallway data-screen terminals.

  70. A few considerations by Manuka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since this is new construction, go the extra mile and feed each data outlet with some sort of conduit (PVC, EMT, or flexible). That way, when you want to upgrade or expand, it's a no-brainer and you don't have to rip things apart. EMT conduit has the added bonus of providing RF shielding to your copper cabling, provided it's properly grounded (which it should be). This also gives you the advantage of only needing to put in the plumbing before you put up the sheetrock, and then running the actual wire later.

    Also, Leviton makes a very nice modular structured media system that allows you to do neat things like audio and video distribution in addition to phone and data - they have modular patch panels that make it very easy to do.

    Lastly, whatever you do, TAKE PICTURES of everything you do before you put the sheetrock up - you'll want them for reference when you make changes later.

  71. For what? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I can't imagine what a single AV channel running through the walls could be used for. Obviously you're going to want to have Coax for broadcast/cable channels (to be selected individualy in the diffrent rooms). But really, what good would it do to have one global broadcast to the whole house?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  72. What about those 3com wallplates? by t0qer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't you read slashdot everyday? Shame on you if you don't!

    Just a few weeks ago there was this article about 3com faceplates. You can consolidate all your phone and data into 1 jack while running just 1 cable run to your rooms. Now if you got money to burn, you might consider one of these babies from Cisco. This is their media convergence server which will combine voice/data/video into something that can run over cat5. A MCS will cut out your need to run separate phone and video lines. Hey want to hire me to set this stuff up? I'm totally jobless right now and could really use the money :) Good luck on your house!

  73. LinkSys's EG0008 is not $189. by dew · · Score: 2

    I think you confused your products. The LinkSys switch with 8 ports all gigabit, the EG0008, as an MSRP of $1400 and is selling on the street for about $850. That's not $189.

    --

    David E. Weekly
    Code / Think / Teach / Learn
    h4x0r for

  74. Specific cool use of fiber by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 2
    Passive fiber links let you use IR remote controls anywhere in the house. A friend of mine has his stereo (totally IR controlled) in the basement. He dropped a fiberoptic line from a modified doorbell bracket in the living room, down to a terminus right in front of the stereo's photocell. Result: aim the remote control at the decorative bracket in the living room, and you can control the invisible stereo. Surprisingly nice to have such an inobtrusive install.

    What amazed me is that nonterminated cable is just fine for that purpose! He literally just fished the glass (and cladding) through the wall and mounted it in brackets at each end.

  75. Re:fast ethernet and POTS by YKnot · · Score: 3, Informative

    Both half and full duplex ethernet in the 10mbit and 100mbit variety use 2 pairs, one for sending, one for receiving.

  76. Plans I have for my parents house by KjetilK · · Score: 2
    I have been thinking about issues like this and I'll be very interested in what comes of this.

    My parents live in a largish appartment, in a small complex with 30 similar appartments. There is some money around, so I was thinking about building a LAN there. A lot have to be digged down into the ground, and I have been thinking about persuading these people to dig down fiber. Around here, it isn't that infeasible getting fiber all the way.

    When thinking about bandwidth, I've been thinking along these lines: If bandwidth is more expensive than CPU, then compression will be common, if CPU is more expensive than bandwidth, things will be transmitted with little or no compression. And this may change quite rapidly, so what is the application I can think of that I might realistically see that takes the most bandwidth? Uncompressed HDTV. And that is, AFAIK, 1.45 Gbits/s, right? I know of no copper that can do that. It stops at about 1.2 Gbits/s, right? So, if we take the expense of digging something down, it can't be copper.

    Inside the house, I have planned go get a diskless old box with a Fibrechannel card and use as router and firewall. Then, making conduits inside the house so that other cables can be replaced with not too much effort. From the router in the basement, I'll have a standard copper cable, cat5 or whatever to the server, which is a box that will run whatever I need of e-mail, web, the lot. Then, there will be a similar cable to the main workstation. Finally, there will be a cable to the TV.

    Other than that, I'll base it on wireless. People here have voiced concerns about security, and indeed, it must be made in such a way that the firewall isn't made pointless. But putting a lot of wire when you can use Bluetooth (which has been my primary choice, but I don't know), or 802.11 seems a complete waste. You can't wire all the gadgets I want anyway (I want the fridge online! And the washing machine, and the... :-) ) so most things must be on wireless anyway. However, with Bluetooth, I need at least two points in the house, so obviously I need cables from the router in the basement to the points where the senders and transmitters are.

    OK, these weren't advices, just a few loose thoughts, but I figured I'd share them.

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    1. Re:Plans I have for my parents house by mpe · · Score: 2

      My parents live in a largish appartment, in a small complex with 30 similar appartments. There is some money around, so I was thinking about building a LAN there. A lot have to be digged down into the ground, and I have been thinking about persuading these people to dig down fiber

      Unless the distances involved are greater than the 100m limit for CAT then there probably isn't much point installing fibre. However when you dig you install ductwork so you can always replace cable later on...

  77. You can't Plan Ahead by nuintari · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My expiriance with wiring from the ground up is that you cannot plan for everything. You'll always think of something else that you wanna do with your existing scheme, and need to pull more wire. So conduits are the only option.

    As for fiber, I've never had to pay for it, but I've had to work with it. Its not worth the effort to use it, go high quality cat-5, and if ya want, then ya can go GigE. I'm told fiber is cheap to buy, expensive, and hard to run, and the hardware to talk over it is murderously expensive. But maybe even the cable itself is expensive, I dunno, used it, don't like it, don't wanna think about paying for it.

    Conduits, and loads of them, will make your life easier, and will greatly improve the value of your home, wish my house had conduits, but mine predates WW2..... and has power consumtion issues. *cries*

    As for what to put in the cables, its whatever ya wanna do with it. Me, right now, I;d run s-video, cat5, and coax, and maybe whatever the current "buzz" cable type is, and at least 4 outlets in each small room, 6 to 8 in big rooms. Else, your wife/significant other will go mad when she can't move the TV. And put em fairly close to your electrical outlets, so ya can just take all your cables that are close together, and tie em together with zip ties, and make the mess behind your euipment a little more pleassent.

    --

    --Nuintari

    slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

    1. Re:You can't Plan Ahead by nuintari · · Score: 2

      Oy yeah, maybe I should mentioned that power and data don't mix.

      I shoul;d hed my own advice, the giant knot bwehind ym amchiens takes me back to my boyscout days everytime try to move it.

      --

      --Nuintari

      slashdot : where an opinion can be wrong.

  78. ra few more tips by xah · · Score: 2, Informative
    A lot of good comments. Here are some points that haven't been thoroughly addressed.

    Running the fiber will increase the value of your house. That might make it worth doing even if you never use it.

    While running conduit is a good alternative to fiber, do not use metal conduit. It hurts cable performance.

    Placing a single CAT-5 cable in 1" metal conduit resulted in degradation of return loss, attenuation and near-end crosstalk (NEXT), three key indicators of cable performance. The cable in the tests was still within specification, but was worse in all cases when placed in conduit. Capacitive coupling between the conduit and the cable was believed to be responsible. (LINK)

    If you run shielded twisted pair, or STP, instead of the usual unshielded twisted pair, or UTP, you need to ground it properly. See for example this link .

    Consult your fire codes and follow them. You might need to install plenum cable in certain spaces. When in doubt, install plenum.

    Whatever cable you run, leave lots of slack on each end. This is cheap insurnace against a cable problem.

    Try to adhere to a standard when you install the cable, such as EIA/TIA-568 for Ethernet.

    If you are worried about Echelon type spying, you will need to run fiber and take other precautions.

    --
    I am not a lawyer. Do not take my words as legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney.
  79. CAT5 _is_ your phone cable by LordNimon · · Score: 2
    Don't run separate phone and cat5 cables, because cat5 can be used to carry phone signals (4 lines to be exact). Just run at least two cat5 cables to each room, and then you can wire each one to be a phone line or a network connection.

    Also, don't forget to make sure that your data cables (cat5, rg6, whatever) are always at least 6" away from the power cables.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  80. Re:Phone wire?!?? - beware by indigo78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The company where I was employed one year ago had shared plugs for ethernet and phone. They set up every plug in the wall according to their needs. This could be very good, since it gave all the things a good modularity, but they had lots of problems (mainly about performance on the ethernet side). I can't tell you whether this problem was related to the shared plugs or to the ethernet structure. I know nothing about how this could have been done (except that they didn't use Voice over IP). Just be warned about possible problems of this solution...

    --
    I'm fat, you're ugly. I can get slimmer, and you?
  81. Not cat5, not fiber: CONDUIT! by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 2

    I wired every room with two runs of cat5: one for telephone, one for data. I ran conduit to a few rooms. The conduit has proven much more valuable than the cat5. And given the expense of terminating and testing every run, it would have been much cheaper to run conduit (NMT aka smurf tubing) to every room.
    -russ

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  82. Cat-5 for phones works very well. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2


    I use Cat-5 for telephone lines, and it works very well.

    Be SURE that each telephone line is on two wires that are a twisted pair. If you run telephone lines on wires that are in adjacent pairs, you will get terrible crosstalk.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  83. No need for expensive Fiber by Density_Altitude · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many comments suggests using fishing wire to pull the cables into conduits etc.

    My advise is that this is a good idea, but once you've finished with pulling copper leave the fishing wire there and voila, you've got a cheap optical fiber ready to go!

    I'd say use around 20 pounds tested wires to get a clean signal ;-)

    --
    delete free(system.gc);
  84. Re:Am I allowed to run cables myself? by LordNimon · · Score: 2
    So my question is, at which point can I legally and pratically get into the house and run my own cables?

    Generally, not until after you close on the house, at which point it will be too late. If you really want to wire it yourself, you're going to have to sneak in. And if you have an OnQ system, like I do, then it really won't work, because the installer will be responsible for all the wiring, and he'll notice. Plus, who's going to install the jacks? Sooner or later, someone will catch you, and then you'll be in trouble.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  85. Two pairs only. by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 2

    He's right. 10 and 100 Base-T use two pairs only for all modes of operation.

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  86. Wireless? by rknop · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I would run cat-5 cable if I were you. It will be useful for the forseeable future... and who knows what you will want to have run in 10 years? Redo it when the time comes. In the mean time, for a house network, it's hard to imagine 100Mb/s not being sufficient for several years.

    I've run cat-5 cable in two houses. After a few months, you forget how painful it was and are just grateful to have it. In my old house, which was very small, I only wired a couple of rooms, but it was nice once it was there. In the new house, I only wired a single room. I intended to wire several more... but instead got myself a couple of wireless cards. The desktop has a card, and I have a second for the laptop. I run them in Ad-Hoc mode. It's much more convenient this way. I had intended to have lots of drops wired in, so that I could run my laptop in whatever room, but now I can do that with a very minimum of pain. More expensive, yes, but more flexible and much easier to install in the first place.

    (The one wire runs between the room with my desktop and the cable modem, and the room with my Wife's desktop. Since both computers stay in one place all the time, it makes sense to have wires for them. Since my Linux desktop is also the house router, it has three network cards: one for the cable modem, one for the house net, and one wireless card. I have two different private 192.168.x.x subnets in just my one house....)

    -Rob

  87. Gigabit over copper. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

    Hi definition uncompressed video is more than 100Mb/sec - but 1Gb/sec over copper is on the horizon.

    Gigabit ethernet, at least, is fairly cheap right now. Check dlink's site for a fair idea of what pricing is like.

    Gigabit will run over standard cat-5 cable (it actually just runs slower signals in parallel over multiple pairs), so you won't even have to rewire for it.

    The problem is hubs. I have yet to see a good gigabit hub for under $2k or so. Most of the gigabit-compatible hubs offered use gigabit for uplink, and a handful of 100-base-T links for the rest of the ports.

    Has this changed in the past 6 months or so?

    Using a PC as a router in place of a hub isn't an option, as one gigabit ethernet card will come very close to saturating a 32-bit 33 MHz PCI bus. Start streaming large amounts of data through the house and the router will fail to handle the traffic.

    1. Re:Gigabit over copper. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

      The problem is hubs. I have yet to see a good gigabit hub for under $2k or so. Most of the gigabit-compatible hubs offered use gigabit for uplink, and a handful of 100-base-T links for the rest of the ports.

      What sort of crack are you on? Check out the Linux [linuxrouter.org] Router Project [sourceforge.net], freesco, etc. I own an ISP [stormforge.net] that is Cisco free using entirely LRP based routers and firewalls.

      And your internal routers are either not routing (saturated) gigabit traffic through multiple cards, or not running on commodity hardware.

      Even a hub - not a router, which is more expensive - that can handle more than one gigabit connection at full data rate costs about $2000 US. Find me a better price, with a link. My own numbers are from dlink (http://www.dlink.com). The links you posted describe _software_. The problem is expensive _hardware_. The machines you describe do not have the internal data transfer bandwidth to handle multiple saturated gigabit interfaces, so I'm puzzled as to why you even mention them as examples.

      I think for a router you will find that in practice it will be pretty difficult to saturate the 32-bit 33MHz PCI bus.

      I am a-priori assuming an application that will saturate gigabit ethernet channels. Otherwise there's no reason to use gigabit at all, as you point out.

      More than one saturated gigabit ethernet interface would certainly swamp a 32-bit 33 MHz PCI bus.

      Joe user's LAN and cable modem won't do this. A fileserver with a single IDE drive won't do this.

      Something like, say, a communications-limited distributed computing project sure would, and most interesting computing problems are communications-limited when scaled up past one box.

      Any application that requires streaming uncompressed (lossless) video streams between machines at better-than-NTSC resolution would also require better bandwidth than 100-base-T provides. Why someone would use multiple machines for something like this is left as an exercise for the reader.

      Either way, both I and the post I was replying to were assuming the existence of some need for gigabit ethernet.

  88. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by Teferi · · Score: 3, Informative

    cat5e is definitely gigabit, according to my handy Black Box catalog.
    cat6 hasn't been ratified yet, but will allow gigabit and beyond.

    --
    -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
  89. Re:On the other hand... by dhogaza · · Score: 2

    In my area, at least, burying boxes this way is a no-no and would surely draw the wrath of the electrical inspector. Your electrician will know if this is true in your area.

    Making a map would seem to answer the obvious objection to burying boxes, but what guarantee is there that the next owner will get the map? Or that you'll not lose it? Or get hit by a truck without bothering to tell anyone where it is or what it is?

    The idea is that another electrician should be able to come in and figure out the wiring including all splices without ripping out all your walls.

  90. That OTHER wire by jackal! · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you're going to do this, and do this right, might as well have fun.

    Run an indistinct wire, (go for red or something equally ominous) along with everything else.

    Ten years from now when you're pulling the old stuff with your buddies look terribly surprised or upset to see it. Claim that you have no idea to what it is, but always insist that THEY cut it any time one gets in your way...

    --

    Who moderates the meta-moderators?

  91. run 5e and wire pulls for the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The only thing that makes it cheap to install now is the ease of installation, and can be easily offset by that expensive fiber becoming useless by advancing technology; maybe the latest stereo equipment in 10 years needs a certain quality fiber and your stuff just doesn't match...doh!

    Put in string/wire for pulling new runs into each room. Having the string to pull new cables will make installing the latest+greatest in 10 years a snap if you need it. Also think through how "hard" the house really will be to wire once it is built. Consider that very few rooms will actually NEED ethernet, and houses with a complete basement or underground space access and/or attic space access are pieces of cake to wire(I wired the downstairs of one house with a full basement with open ceiling(ie floor joists visible etc) in about 30 minutes; the longest part was triple-checking where to drill holes through the wood flooring and terminating the cables.) Attics make wiring upstairs just as easy. Drop a wire down into the wall, poke hole in wall, pull wire into room, cut hole for electrical box, install box, terminate, and put faceplate in. Done.

    The trick/problem is when you need to go from the attic to the basement etc, or you need to get up to a room in the 1st floor and the area underneath it has a fully finished ceiling(like a plaster ceiling) and you can't just drill from below. Raised tile ceilings for basements are a great idea for exactly this reason, very easy access, and lower sound, too; some panels are very sound-absorbing, both reflective and transmitted(ie, sound in the room vs sound from upstairs etc) compared to a plastered ceiling. You can also sneak cabling up to there with a wire tube(some nice ones come with self-adhesive tape on the back, peel+stick after marking w/level etc) and just toss it across the tiles. Anyone who has worked at a startup company with a raised or open ceiling is very well aware of these advantages ;-)

    Run the Cat5e now because it's not going to get much cheaper, it already -is- cheap, and its easy to install now(plus, its extremely common and unlikely to go flying out the door any time soon.)

    Don't waste time having the contractor terminate the cables(it represents most of the labor) unless he/she can certify the runs(this means plugging in a VERY expensive piece of test gear, which runs dozens of different signal strength/crosstalk tests etc; the guy then gives you a sheet for EACH run that says its up to spec; Lucent, for example, requires this for use with their gear, as they do Lucent cable, which is some of the best I've used) otherwise, you're no better than they are and you'll save serious dough(server rooms where lots of runs are needed are a different matter; the pros can lay down cable, bunch it up and terminate it into patch boards into something that looks like fine art and works terrifically, plus they can certify each run, and you can have someone to scream at if the run doesn't work and the boss can't check his email; ALWAYS have a server room wired by the pros unless its less than a dozen runs and you don't need things to be critical.)

    Consider a patch panel in your wiring closet, and make accomodations for proper power(one dedicated 15 or 20a circuit should be fine), lighting(I suggest a long flour. light, NEVER a bare bulb, you'll be able to see much better) and cooling(vents top and bottom in the door.) Put a weatherstrip on the bottom of the door, this will keep out dust bunnies.)

    The patch panels are not -that- expensive, $100-200 for more wiring than you'll ever need. Same goes for 19 inch wallmount racks, they're very cheap and usually offer a swing-down design that affords VERY easy access to the backs of equipment. Spaced out, everything will keep cool, be easy to clean, and isn't going anywhere.

    Oh...also consider plenum instead of PVC. PVC puts out some -really- nasty stuff when it burns, and it's very thin, so it does burn very quickly(unlike thick PVC plumbing which is also full of water usually.) Plenum doesn't put out nasties when it burns(which is why its allowed in more places in commercial buildings than PVC is.)

    HTH!
    Brett

  92. Re:On the other hand... by CMiYC · · Score: 2

    I think he mean just the boxes themselves. No wires. I would think you could pass an electrical inspection with having just the boxes there. I can understand not passing if they all had wires running through them. I could be wrong though.

  93. Pneumatic Tubes by justfred · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't forget the Pneumatic Tubes (http://www.ptubes.com/). I really want to build a house with a pneumatic tube network. Use it for sending things like sandwiches and martinis.

    That and the network of toy train tracks running around the crown molding...

    But seriously, dittos on the conduit; home wiring is traditionally held down with things like STAPLES - ewwww. And get yourself a good fish tape (http://www.wisecomponents.com/storecatalog/wirepu ll.htm) while you're at it.

  94. Re:On the other hand... by CMiYC · · Score: 2

    They have every right in the world. Its your house now, but it might not be 20 years from now. And if your house burns down 20 years from now while someone else's kids are sleeping, that is not good. Its all in the name of safety. Well, at least it use to be in the name of safety. Now it might also be in the name of "our city needs more money, and you need a permit for that nail to hang a picture."

    But regardless, I wouldn't want to move into a house without some (even small) level of reassurance someone has said "yeah, as far as we know, this wiring is safe (even if barely)."

  95. Shielded? Nobody uses shielded. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    I've run buildings with miles of unshielded cat5.. so what do you mean? In fact.. isn't the spec for cat5 unshielded twisted-pair?

  96. Yes.. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    They most certainly ARE low voltage.

    You don't get 200+ volt spikes on phone lines.
    The only time you get AC with any voltage is during the ring-trip.

    1. Re:Yes.. by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ring voltage is around 90V, so please don't think of phone lines as low voltage. Also, have you ever seen the spikes on a phone line when there is a lightning strike at a telephone pole?

      Low voltage? Guess again...

    2. Re:Yes.. by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      If i can touch the "live" wires and not get shocked, its low voltage.

      Then it's not low voltage when it's ringing because you'll definitely get shocked. I know. I've been working on phone lines when calls came in.

  97. Re:On the other hand... by CMiYC · · Score: 2

    Something along these lines are probably the best idea. That way if in 10 years its not fiber, but a cable full of bubbles, you aren't screwed. If you do use PVC (or some kind of conduit), just make sure you put some rope in them so that you can pull the cables through later. Otherwise you aren't saving yourself much trouble. (Some, but not much).

  98. Conduit by Null_Packet · · Score: 2

    Run conduit or at least plenty of pull-wires/strings. That way you don't have as much of an issue and you can run what you like when the time comes. If you use conduit and pullwires, then you can pull/add/remove what you like.

  99. Re:On the other hand... by FFFish · · Score: 2

    A simple loop shouldn't be against code. Wire runs down into the box, and right back out. It doesn't get cut at all. If having the wire fold back on itself is a no-no, then have it run through one knockout and out another.

    Who needs a guarantee that I don't lose the map?! Not having the map isn't any worse than not having the boxes in the first place.

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  100. Suggestion by AaronW · · Score: 2

    I wired my older house with tons of CAT5E and coax (use RG6 for coax, BTW). I ran 1 to 2 lines from each room to a central closet where I also installed an AC outlet. In the closet I have a firewall router, cable modem, fast Ethernet switch, and a UPS ($5 at a swap).

    This has worked out quite well. With this setup I can control the cable and network of each room from one central location.

    This was an older home. It was fairly easy to do since I have a crawl space below the house and an attic above.

    If there are places that will be difficult to reach later, put in some tough nylon string to feed wires or cable through later. You will be glad you did. Also, it never hurts to run extra cat5e, as you never know when you'll need it. Cat5e also makes excellent phone cable.

    -Aaron

    --
    This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
  101. Run conduit.... by jordandeamattson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All

    Instead of trying to figure out what to run and what not to run to particular rooms, it is better to run conduit to your specific rooms. This will give you the flexibility to pull CAT-5, Fiber, phone cable, etc. into a particular room without going behind the drywall.

    Therefore, to give yourself the greatest flexibility, I would run conduit down each of the walls in your house. In addition, conduit will protect any cables that you run in the future. One of the problems I have seen with running "naked" cables - of any kind - is that nails or screws used to secure the drywall often end up breaking them. A conduit will protect your cables and "clothe" them.

    In addition, if I was building out a new house, I would put in a few additional items that will make your life easier over the long-term. First, I would build a "wire closet" to which I would run all of my conduits. Second, I would create places in the roof to receive wireless points of presence, so that you can get full coverage over your whole house. Make sure that these wireless access points are appropriately wired for power and have a conduit with CAT-5 running to them. Depending on the size of your house you will need two to four. Position them by looking for a coverage zone of 75 feet (yes, I know that they claim they can hit 150 feet, but this will give you strong coverage). And third, I would look at running a home automation network that would allow you to control lighting, heating, etc. throughout your house.

    Finally, if you haven't put up the roof yet, look at going with solar shingles with a grid tie power system. This will cost more than a standard roof, but with the buy-down that you can get in many states and the zero electric bill you will see, it will the same as a standard roof in the short-term and will cost less within 5 to 10 years.

  102. Forget the cable, worry about replacing them by ghostrider_one · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If I may make a humble suggestion, you should be less worried about what types of cable you run, and more worried about your ability to easily (ie without knocking holes in walls, cieling, etc) replace them in the future. A friend of mine (who yearns to return to the good ol' days when men were men, and code was punched on pieces of cardboard) (Hi, Ross) completely wired his house with state-of-the-art cabling when it was first built. Unfortunatly, what was state-of-the-art back then (ie 10-Base2 coax) is antiquated crap now.


    What I would suggest if you /really/ want to future-proof your cabling is to run all the cabling in PVC conduits with built in pulling-wires. Or alternatively, leave plenty of pulling wires in cielings etc.. Making sure it's going to be easy to pull through new cables in X years down the track, is a hell of a lot more worthwhile than worrying about whether Cat5 or Fibre will still be useful then. The design life of a house is a hell of a lot longer than the useful life of a cabling system.

  103. Ethernet cable is cheap? by richardmilhousnixon · · Score: 2, Informative

    One thing you might want to consider when running your Ethernet cable along with your phone (which in normally not in a conduit), is that local fire codes often require that any vertically-running cable be in a conduit or be fire retardant. You really can't get a 1000' spool of good fire retardant 5e cable for $60. Keep in mind that when wiring your house, the cable is probably going to be the least expensive component, but if you screw up and buy crappy cable (that burns like tissue paper or shatters when you try to crimp it), it can quickly become a serious headache and a serious expense.

    I wired my (already constructed) house a few years ago with cheap cat5 ($50 a spool) and was later informed by an inspector that, if I ever wanted to sell the house, I'd have to replace or remove the cable that I used.

    My suggestion to you is, because your house hasn't been dry walled yet (I assume), run at least one length of conduit to each room (If you want to have two cables going to each room, run one of them along the base of the wall) and use medium-quality cable. If you would rather not pay for conduit, use high-quality fire retardant cable, and talk to an electrician about your local rules and regs.

    --

    --
    -- sometimes AND gates turn me on.
    1. Re:Ethernet cable is cheap? by jroysdon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out Greybar (can't find an online presence). Plenum (fire retardant) cable can be bought for $60-70 for 1000ft. A definent must if you're looking at running power over ethernet. Good powered networking gear (Cisco Catalyst switches) will power down the port if they try and draw too many amps (see it happen when bad runs were causing power loss along the way). I'd hate to see what happens with cheaper gear.

  104. Legal requirements by Syberghost · · Score: 2

    Some people have glossed over this in passing, but you should pay attention:

    In some states, you are legally required to be an electrician (low voltage license) to do this.

    Florida is one example; it was passed this year.

    If you live in a state with this requirement, you might fail your inspection if you do this, and not be able to move into your house.

    Further, if you are building in a development and didn't hire the builder yourself, you must coordinate this with them, or they might very well rip your wires out. I've seen it happen, there is a house in my development sitting empty because the guy put Monster Cables for his stereo through the walls one night, and they cut them all into pieces and threw them away the next day. He backed out of the deal as a result, and now it's an inventory home. They didn't really have much of a choice, since if they fail the inspection they eat the house.

  105. Re:On the other hand... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 2

    On that note, you may also want to have a circuit on each of those drops routed as UPS. Then just put as many UPS's as you want in the garage/basement, and not worry about losing power on things like computer servers, alarm clocks, vcr, etc. Beats putting 9V batteries in everything.

  106. Don't run fiber today, just run plastic conduit. by Nonesuch · · Score: 3, Informative
    I would not run fiber now.

    What I would do is build a patch panel or wiring closet in a basement or similar location, with all telephone/data/audio cabling to other parts of the house home-run to this location.

    If you run 'smurf' (flexbible blue fire-rated plastic tubing) to each room, and two each to bedrooms, media room, then you should be ready for anything.

    When you run the smurf, draw 2xCat5e to each room along with any necessary speaker cable. Most fire codes will permit you to leave in a 'pull line' of a code-accepted material, so you can easily draw more cables (fiber, etc) as needed.

    When running the 'smurf' tubing, try to avoid running in parallel with power conduits, or if you must, maximize the separation. Where you pass power lines, try to intersect at right angles.

  107. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by Hobart · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, whether or not the cable jacket is plenum-rated (usually with Teflon) is completely unrelated to whether or not they wrap an extra layer of foil around the wire (shielded vs unshielded). If you're running unbalanced signals down the wire, such as RS232 serial data (Like Cisco or Sun Netra consoles), shielding is good. But Ethernet and Telephone send electrically opposite signals down each wire, so the electromagnetic fields and the twisting of the wire helps fight interference.

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  108. You don't know how right you are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just took a dump, and oh man, you really will regret it later if you don't put in fibre!

  109. Don't plan on using wireless. by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
    KjetilK writes:
    Other than that, I'll base it on wireless. People here have voiced concerns about security, and indeed, it must be made in such a way that the firewall isn't made pointless. But putting a lot of wire when you can use Bluetooth (which has been my primary choice, but I don't know), or 802.11 seems a complete waste.
    I wouldn't plan on using wireless. The bandwidth is limited, and it is shared bandwidth, whereas if you wire ethernet you can go switched- this is a huge distinction.

    The non-licensed spectrum, especially the 2.4Ghz range where 802.11b lives, is open to all sorts of consumer devices. A couple of neighbors with wirelss X-Cams and your 802.11b network is drowned in noise, totally dead. (I have tested this).

    You can't wire all the gadgets I want anyway (I want the fridge online!
    Security is also a major risk- wireless can easily be sniffed and is not difficult to spoof.

    Do you really want some script kiddie rooting your fridge?

  110. use STEEL Conduit instead of plastic by OmniGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    And if the contractor can't handle conduit (find a better contractor?!), you can do it yourself. Steel conduit is cheap (I know, 'cause I've done this), and conduit benders are not difficult to use. Of course, if you don't wanna use a conduit bender, you can buy prefab curved sections.

    A few things to keep in mind:

    0. Use METAL conduit rather than plastic - indefinite lifetime, RF shielding, and nailproof when hanging pictures. Also easily findable with stud-finder gadgets at need.

    1. Use BENDS rather than square corners (and insist the contractor do so -- inspect before accepting...). Makes pulling cable more fun, and VITAL for fiber (if it ever comes to that)

    2. If you do it yourself, make sure you debur the insides of all conduit ends with the little blade on the tubing cutter. It really sucks to have a short 'cause the conduit cut the insulation.

    3. Check local codes and the building inspector on how to GROUND the conduit properly (one probably grounds this to the building safety ground at the electrical service entrance -- a definite building-inspector question). The building inspector can be made into a very handy resource if you social-engineer the interaction properly - you want him to take you seriously, and to understand that you want to, and are able to, do things right and with proper permits; at this point, he ceases to be an obstacle and becomes an ally. Also, be real clear to the building department that your conduit is LOW-VOLTAGE wiring and NOT power wiring; the code requirements are different.

    Lastly, 3Com has a nifty mini-hub that fits into a wall box, seen on /. recently...

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
    1. Re:use STEEL Conduit instead of plastic by crucini · · Score: 2

      Good points. But don't cut electrical conduit with a pipe cutter - use a hacksaw with the appropriate blade. For EMT that would be 24 teeth per inch. If you use a pipe cutter and fully remove the internal ridge, it takes way longer than using a hacksaw. The only real benefit to a pipe cutter is that the cut is perfectly square. EMT fittings already incorporate tolerance for slightly off-square cuts.

      One other point - if the conduit is installed by a contractor, it's good to require that he pull a mandrel through while you watch. This proves that no obstructions are decreasing the area of the conduit. Obviously, the mandrel must be of the same size as the conduit.

    2. Re:use STEEL Conduit instead of plastic by CharlieG · · Score: 2

      I assume you mean EMT, and NOT rigid steel, because you mentioned the bender (aka a Hickie)

      Living in NYC, electrical is fun - 110v stuff ALL has to be metal armored - be it EMT, rigid, or BX cable - no romex here

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    3. Re:use STEEL Conduit instead of plastic by jpostel · · Score: 2

      I worked a job where the electrician ran the Cat5 through PVC conduit. I literally wore through a bend by pulling RG6 through with a nylon cord. The friction of the nylon just ate away the PVC.

      --
      Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
  111. THE BATHROOM!!!! by SuperDuG · · Score: 2
    Alright ... I know it may seem a little "icky", but you definantelly need to remember to put a phone line and an ehternet port in the bathroom ... I'm sorry, but all those times you'll be sitting there ... relatively bored ... you could be conducting business transactions and sending email ...

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  112. Some thoughts.... by chrisd · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Some things I've run into with my basement remodel and upgrading a 1936 place for modern data and phone. The previous owenr updated the electric froom hook and look to conduit.

    1....You want to be careful about running parallel data/phone, audio,video and power close to each other. Even with high quality cable, you can have problems.

    2.....Do not strand boxes with wire inside them. Sealing over live boxes is a huge no-no. Why? Because what if you drive a nail into an active box. Many municipalistes will force you to correct this if you want to move.

    3.....You cannot route wires through heating /ac ducts. Probably ovious, but I thought I'd note it.

    4.....Always run more cat-5 than you need. If you are pulling two lines for net and phone, pull another. It's no real extrta cash and coudl save you later. Also, it's nice if you want to pull an extra line that is outside the firewall to your office for guests.

    5.....Think about where you want your wireless for home coverage. I have a smaller house, so I don't have any problem, but if my house were more spread out, I'd probably hav eto move the antenna out of the basement, necessitating a run of cat-5 to wherever, with nearby power. It's either that or run a very long antenna line.

    6.....Power, power, power. A computer + Laser Printer + Ups + Monitor + other gee gaws will suck up at least a 20 amp circuit. You don't want to over load a circuit. That's bad. I'm running 3 seperate circuits for the home office. 1 for fridge and other stuff, 1 for computer geear and 1 for lighting.

    7.....Check references for all contractors if you aren't plannign on pulling bits yourself.

    8.....Get familiar with your local codes. They are there to protect you, generally. Finding out where you are required to do GFCI circuits alone can save you trouble later.

    Good luck.

    --
    Co-Editor, Open Sources
    Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
  113. Re:On the other hand... by von+Moltke · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am not an electrician, but I've done my own electrical work, so here's my opinion:

    The way I understand it, according to the National Electric Code, any box with wires running into it (even if it is just a pass-through) needs to be accessable. The thing to do in this case would be to cut the holes in the plasterboard and cover the box with a blank plate.

    The bonus with this method is that the placement of the boxes is obvious and the plasterboard doesn't need to be cut later. Therefore a map is unnecessary. Also, if the walls are concrete block and plaster, not plasterboard, this is the only practical way to go (unless you want to start cutting holes in the block for new boxes).

  114. 200? by fm6 · · Score: 2

    That's worth a Slashdot article all by itself!

  115. I ran fiber, but... by Multics · · Score: 2

    I have mostly cat 5e everywhere. Into each wall three drops. Then a drop is normally phone and the other two can be whatever. All run as a star.

    I *did* run fiber and a Topaz transformer ultra-isolated AC circuit (with separate ground) to the stuff that then goes on to my antenna tower. The goal was to use the fiber as a 20 meter lighting gap between the stuff over there (soon to be a long-haul 802.11 link) and the rest of my network. So now when (not if) lightning comes to wreck my day, the worst that will happen in terms of data is the tower end of the data service (fiber hub, 802.11 stuff, some ham stuff) will all go POOF, but the core network will be safe.

    If I had a separate garage, I'd run fiber (via a conduit) to there too. Fiber is *perfect* for longer hauls where lightning can be a problem. I buy all my fiber links from ebay, BTW... way cheaper than 'for real' and also allows me to avoid having to terminate them myself.

    -- Multics

  116. Wireless by GiMP · · Score: 2

    Why not use wireless?

  117. Re:fast ethernet and POTS by GC · · Score: 3, Informative

    oh great -

    moderators mod this one up 1 (but I don't get any credit as my karma is 50 already), then two come alone a and mod it down...

    back to 48... lovely...

    It seems I have been mistaken though - I've looked and it seems that all use 2 pairs except for T4 and Gigabit Ethernet over copper... the best I could find was this reference, it makes no mention of duplex, but does give some information.

    I have no idea where I got the idea that full duplex required extra pairs - I must be such a dumbo.

  118. Don't need any more hubs by itwerx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You only need as many hubs/ports as you have live connections. Leave the rest disconnected.

    Or do other things with them:

    - intercom
    - security system
    - bundle pairs (to get enough wire-gauge) and have whole-house audio
    - data-collection (e.g. thermostat, weather-station etc.)

    Cat-5 provides good, clean signal over a variety of wavelengths - the possibilities are endless.

  119. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by TimX · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is true.
    I just did my own wiring in the house that I just bought a month ago. I ran Cat5e, because it much more inexpensive and I design and install LAN/WAN equipment, and deal with fiber everyday. I hate fiber. The Transceivers along will run you $900 per end, that's a minimum $1800 per drop. Plus you will need to by the switches.

    Why do that when you can buy a four port Gigabit UTP switch for less than $300 and Gigabit nic's for $44.

  120. Don't forget the pictures by _Chainsaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No matter what you run eventually you will forget exactly how and where you ran it... before the drywall goes up go into each room and take pictures of every wall and the ceilings, these can be a major time saver when trying to find wiring, studs etc. later on.

    I'm with the guys that are reccomending running coax... you can never have enough cable TV jacks..put on in every wall. (Honey, can't we put the couch over there and the TV over there???? No, there's no cable TV jack.)

    If you live in an area where ceiling fans are commonly used have a box put in the ceiling of every room and the multi-gang switch boxes in the walls... major pain in the ass to try and put these in later.

  121. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by ryanvm · · Score: 2

    It will be a little more expensive, but you might want to think about stringing "STP" CAT5, instead of UTP... that's Shielded Twisted Pair instead of Unshielded.

    I'm by no means an expert on the matter, but a few years ago I did a lot of reading about comparisons between different cabling methodologies (UTP, STP, coax, etc).

    The interesting thing about STP is that you'd think that the shielding could only help. However, unless you ground it, the long stretches of shielding can actually make interference worse by acting like a giant antenna.

  122. Todays fiber is not future proof by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 3, Informative

    The question is should I run fiber? I really don't know how much the cable costs since I don't know what cable to use. It is much easier to run cable
    before the drywall goes in so I want to make an informed decision now. Ten years from now will I need/want fiber?"


    The only reason to run fiber is if the needed cable length, exceed recommended CAT5e length.
    Fiber has several disadvantages (I am no cable expert); Connectors; There is a plethora of competing connectors. The most common; SC and ST connectors are rather bulky, and doesn't really work beyond 1Gbps. The new breed of small form connectors for >1Gbps hasn't been certified yet.
    If you plan to run fiber "end-to-end", you will have a really limited supply of products to choose from, pay premium prices, and to some extent be tied up with
    with whatever connector you choose to begin with.
    Changing or making the end-termination on fiber, is much more expensive on fiber, than on copper. (the SMF connector "VF-45" from 3M claims to be the cheapest to use, when doing end-to-end fiber).

    The price difference between even a managed 24p 100TX switch and a 24p 100 FX (fiber) switch is significant. The price on 1000 SX fiber equipment is also much higher than 1 GBIC copper equipment.

    We just evaluated upgrading our fiber backbone from 10Mbit to either 100FX or 1000SX. (we run a non-profit ISP for 300 apartments), and the price difference between a using a fiber or a copper core switch is very high indeed. If it wasn't for the fact, that our cable length requirements exceed Cat 5e/6, it would probably be cheaper to abandon the fiber and re-wire with copper.

    Using fiber-converters (transceivers) also sucks; they cost too much (one needed for every connected device), is yet another source for network problems, and requires yet another power plug.

    Actually I believe, that the money saved from investing in fiber and fiber equipment now, could pay for a totally fiber re-wiring if the need for such really should arise into the future.

    I really think you will be much better off using copper. People in the know claims, that even though Class D/Cat 6 (200MHz) isn't certified as a standard yet (?), the commercial "Cat 6" cabling systems availably now, should conform to the coming standard. So Cat 6 should be a much better long term investment than fiber. AFAIK Cat 6 should do 10Gbps. Again, people who knows much more than I do, claims that the present standard for multi mode fiber (50 and 62,5 Micron)
    doesn't do more than 1,2 Gbps reliably, and is a "dead" standard like Cat 5, and 5e. The coming fiber standards /type (10Gbps) probably named "Laser optimized multimode fiber" LOMMF or OM3 is still in the works.

    To summon up;
    Cat 5e is the cheap and tried solution. If future needs doesn't go beyond 1Gbps, then why not.

    Cat 6 is slightly more expensive, but is much more "future proof" (10Gbps). Perhaps one is still advised to buy a complete system, from the same vendor though.
    It allready seems, that Cat 6 rapidly has become the choice when people wire new offices.

    Present day fiber standards are not future proof (1,2Gbps), too expensive; not only the fiber cabling systems, but all devices that need to connect with it, and is probably something best left to a professional electrician to install.

    Peoples advice about conduit and pull wires, are probably the real key to a long term investment.
    A cheap ethernet tester will probably pay for it self too, if you are going to make a lot of cables.

  123. Check with your builder.... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2

    I inquired about the same thing here in Ohio when building my house. The builder would not let me do anything but the stuff on the work equity list. I asked about Cat 5 and running some RG-58 (for Amateur Radio) myself and they said NO extra wiring period. If I did add it, I would not have gotten my FHA approval since I do have a FHA loan.

    Personally, even with the security issues with Wi-Fi, I would rather use it. Much more flexible and you can always setup as VPN gateway on the access point. It's much more flexible and if you decide you NEED your laptop when your on the crapper then you can do it (not that I would do it, but hey I know SOMEONE might someday!). Besides, when I get my laptop and Wi-Fi stuff, I can surf the web on a nice day out on my deck. That's just plain cool! :)

    On a side note, all of my phone cabling IS Cat-5. I can steal a pair off of it since I am only using one for voice and it would work. When I decide to excise the phone and ONLY use a mobile phone, then I can just add a hub on the other side of the wall from where the demarc boax is.

    --

    Gorkman

  124. What I did by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Informative
    First of all, you've got the (potential) advantage of new construction. In my case, when I was shopping for a house this summer, one of the things I was looking for was a single-story house, so I could have access to all the walls from the attic. (In Austin you can't have a basement without using lots of dynamite.) With new construction, your best bet would be lots of 1" inner diameter PVC conduit going all over the house to empty electrical boxes. Make sure they don't run parallel to the electrical wires!

    What I did was pull eight drops of six cat-5 and one RG-6 to six rooms. (Actually only seven RG-6 drops because I ran out.) I used up most of two 1000 foot boxes.

    Don't pull single wires, pull bundles. When I had the holes drilled and the weather was cool enough to stay in the attic all day, I pulled the wire from both boxes through the house, along with the RG-6, then folded the end over and did it again twice. I used cheap box tape to hold the wires together in the interim, then I used cable ties to tie it together into one evil looking snake. It just barely fits in a 1" hole. So far I haven't crimped the ends of the RG-6, but when I do start using it, I'll just stuff the extra cat-5 keystone jack back into the wall.

    In two of the drops, I didn't have to drill because there was no drywall over the cabinets (nowadays the ceilings go in first, so I was lucky), and in another, there was already a hole where I wanted it. The last hole was the toughest because it was on an outside wall, the roof about three feet above me. I cut a hole for three-inch pipe in my closet, giving nine times the area of a 1" hole, just right for eight bundles and the outside wiring, then put a pipe and a right angle joint at the top. The hole was cut well enough that the whole thing fits snugly with no glue or plaster.

    Assorted bits of advice: Forget about fiber, it's too much of a pain in the arse for home use. The only fiber you want is one strand going out of your house (dream on!). And besides, there are two diameters, and single vs multi-mode, but cat-5 is cat-5. Don't forget about the RG-6, because that means you can have cable/satellite in any and every room in the house. And if you buy wood bits, get 1" bits, and get them made in the USA with lifetime warranty. Wal-Mart sells these for under three bucks each. The crap from China won't last for more than one or two holes. Ultrasonic stud finders kick ass. Wig pins are good for pushing through drywall to find out the exact point of a stud, both on walls and ceilings. Not all horizontal studs in your attic are directly over the wall; if you're not careful, you'll drill out the top of a wall or even worse, paneling. (Yes, I did drill out some paneling. That's how I know.)

    Switched 100mbit Ethernet in the kitchen kicks ass. And it means you get to use more AC circuits for those big LAN parties.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  125. Take Pictures by dkresge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't stress the importance of FFFish's comments enough. Make certain to take pictures (digital cameras are great) of *every* cable run in *every* wall before the rock goes up. It's so much easier to be able to have an "x-ray" view of your house when doing additions in the future. Additionally, it's a nice resale point for prospective future buyers ("and, should you ever want to upgrade, here is a look behind the walls").

    As for the original question, skip the fiber -- go 2 RG6 and 2 CAT5 to each room, and run flexible conduit for future expansion (don't forget to run a length between the attic and the first floor/basement -- it'll save you)

    -D

  126. I installed conduit in my new home... by Beatlebum · · Score: 2, Informative

    Four years ago I purchased a new home in Alameda (SF Bay Area). A friend of mine recommended that I go with home-run conduit to every room. I eventually did get my conduit, however, I had to fight the builders who did not want to do anything out of the ordinary. They tried to snow-job me by claiming conduit was against residential code, so I called the inspector and he told me it was fine for low voltage wiring. Eventually I wore them down and I got my conduit. I think it cost around $1500 for 8 home runs in a 2700 sq foot house. If you do manage to get conduit it is important that you

    1) Get the largest diameter possible. I got 1.5".
    2) Ensure that the turn radius is as large as possible i.e. the conduit should take sweeping turns rather than tight turns because the increase in friction will make it very hard to pull cable. Remember that cat5 cable is only certified up to a pulling force of around 15lbs.

    After the house was completed my wife and I spent 2 weekends pulling Cat5e (lucent is the best) and RG6. We pulled 5 cat5 runs to each downstairs room and garage and 3 to the upstairs. In each case 1 cat5e supports up to 4 phone lines. Special conduit lubricant is a must, it's designed to make the pulling easier and keeps the wires lubricated after the fact. Of course a good quality fish-tape is a must, don't go cheap. The runs are terminated in my den, obvisouly you should pick a central location. In the den I have a server cabinet and a rackmount switch and a patch panel for the LAN and phone lines. The switch is connected to a firewall/router which is connected to a cable modem. You can plug a machine in anywhere in the house & DHCP will get you an IP and an internet gateway. I also have a couple of Audiotrons to stream music from my server.

    I did all the cat5 wiring myself. The trickiest part is terminating the cables, a cat5 circuit tester will save you a lot of time, of course you will also need all the crimping tools, wire strippers etc. I used Pandiut components throughout for the connectors, faceplates etc, their stuff is modular and well designed. A good guide to all this stuff is "Mike's Basic Guide to Cabling Computers & Telephones in Homes & Apartments"

  127. Re:cat5 + power by renehollan · · Score: 2
    In a word: NO!.

    You want to keep such runs at leastr 12" apart, cross them at 90 degree angles when necessary, and only bring them close in a split multi-ganged box (if your code permits that).

    --
    You could've hired me.
  128. Plenum by shepd · · Score: 2

    Lots of mis-information about plenum cabling here.

    Plenum cabling doesn't necesarialy burn less all the time.

    Plenum cabling is desgined to burn less in certain directions.

    IIRC, plenum means it won't burn sideways as well as upwards. If you want the other cable, I think you need "riser" cable (or something like that). If you plan to do this in an office building, this is a good time to find out. Otherwise they may make another crappy OJ Simpson movie.

    Where I live, if your house is made with wood, you can put in any comm. cable you like (as long as it doesn't give off toxic fumes without burning! ;-). Why? Because if there's a fire in a wood house you have a lot more to worry about than some lame-ass cabling.

    The only exception (again, for where I live) is that you have to use special cabling for running cable through air-ducts.

    But, once you move into offices, you _really_ need to watch those laws. The fire inspector will bust your ass if you run the wrong FT-rating cable. (IIRC, FT-5 for plenum spaces, FT-4 for anywhere else in offices).

    BTW: This may be incorrect for your area, and I refuse to claim responsibility if you use the wrong cable and cause harm to anything with your use of it.

    Note: Plenum is availiable for almost any cable. UTP, STP, coax, power, you name it.

    Careful grounding your STP -- over very long distances (like many floors in an office building) a ground differential can cause HUGE current loops through your ground. I've heard stories about ground jackets setting on fire in runs from the top floor to the basement in office buildings.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  129. OT: Use plenum by mosch · · Score: 5, Informative
    This isn't directly on topic, but it's important so I wanted to make sure you read this.

    USE PLENUM

    Yes, it costs more, but it meets building code, and isn't nearly so flammable. Please don't be cheap and use the PVC stuff that will help housefires spread wonderfully just to save $100.

    1. Re:OT: Use plenum by mosch · · Score: 2

      go outside, lay down some pvc and some plenum next to each other, turn on a propane blowtorch. that'll clear up your misconception that the only difference is toxic fumes. there's also a difference in flash point and burn rate.

  130. Let the Electrician Do It by smack.addict · · Score: 2
    Have the electrician who is wiring your phones do it. A lot of times these guys run cat3 for phone, you can get him to run cat5 for both phone and ethernet and get it all over with at once.


    Fiber is probably a waste of time, but maybe not.

  131. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by mosch · · Score: 2

    STP has nothing to do with whether or not the outer jacket is PVC or plenum. UTP plenum is widely available, and widely deployed. Shielded cable makes for a nightmare of floating grounds that most people don't deal with properly.

  132. Power & AC by Ratbert42 · · Score: 2

    Don't forget to consider your power and air conditioning needs. My office is pushing the limits of both.

    1. Re:Power & AC by Nonesuch · · Score: 2
      Good point

      When I did my home office, I had the electricians put in 'quad' grounded outlets and 20-AMP circuits all around.

      The cost for quads isn't much more than the cost for the usual 2-outlet boxes, and makes finding a spare outlet for additional systems much easier. The use of 20A breakers means that you are that much more likely to trip the 10/15A circuit breaker on a power strip before you trip a breaker down at the main panel.

      You might also consider a whole house surge protector.

  133. Why ruin a house? by SilentChris · · Score: 2
    Personally, I'd like to echo the statement that a lot of other people have been making around here: why ruin a house with wiring you will need to redo in 5-10 years? Why not just purchase an 802.11b access point now, graduate to bigger standards down the road, and save your walls. Yes, you will be behind the technological curve, but quite frankly, I haven't found many uses in which my home network would have benefitted from more than 11 Mbps (we're talking a network of four or five machines here, not 200 like at work).

    I have all of machines networked wirelessly, with a WinXP/Linux machine serving as a gateway to my cable connection. Simple, no fuss, and no matter where you go inside (and outside) the house, you can always have a connection.

  134. Complete wiring guides: by Futurepower(tm) · · Score: 5, Informative


    Glad you mentioned this, because it reminded me how difficult it is to find good documentation about wiring Ethernet.

    As a wise Slashdot reader once said, "You can't have too much overkill", so here is the wiring scheme shown 3 different ways. I hope it saves you the time of gathering it together yourself.

    Slashdot doesn't allow the HTML PRE tag. Slashdot removes leading spaces, so I've used dots below. Another problem is that the lameness filter is lame. That lameness filter is definitely named correctly.

    Use only Standard EIA/TIA T568B. This is also called the AT&T specification. T568A is NOT USED.

    T568B:

    When the hook of the RJ-45 Ethernet connector is underneath, pin 1 is on the left.

    Pair 1 is pins 4 and 5, Blue and White/Blue.

    Pair 2 is pins 1 and 2, White/Orange and Orange (Transmit Data + and -)

    Pair 3 is pins 3 and 6, White/Green and Green (Receive Data + and -).

    Pair 4 is pins 7 and 8, White/Brown and Brown.

    /--T21 White/Orange
    Pair2 \--R22 Orange
    /--------- -T33 White/Green
    / /-R14 Blue
    Pair3 \ Pair1 \-T15 White/Blue
    \--------- -R36 Green
    /--T47 White/Brown
    Pair4 \--R48 Brown


    Pin ColorPairName

    1 wh/or 2 TxData +
    2 or2 TxData -
    3 wh/grn3 RecvData+
    4 blu 1
    5 wh/blu1
    6 grn 3 RecvData-
    7 wh/brn4
    8 brn 4


    I know this sounds crazy, but standard Ethernet uses ONLY pairs 2 and 3, for both half and full duplex. The other wires just sit there, unused. (It is possible to buy external adapters to use the other two pairs as a second 10- or 100 Megabit 100Base-T connection.)

    The R1, T1, R2, T2 designations are for telephones. R1 is Ring 1 (the red wire at the telephone box). T1 is Tip 1 (the green wire at the telephone box). Ring and Tip are old names for the telephone wires, but if you talk to a telephone company installer, he or she will use those names.

    Quite obviously, someone messed this up majorly, as in "How can we make this confusing?"

    If you are new to wiring Ethernet start with the simple explanation at Johns Closet (as in wiring closet): Wiring: Color Codes, Terms, and Tools.

    See the Leviton Do and Don't Guides

    See the Wiring Guides at the Leviton Learning Center . See the Residential And Light Commercial Installation Practices (Tia-570 Compliance) [PDF file] guide.

    Also see the wiring specs at FAQS.org: 9.0 Standard EIA/TIA 568 (Use ONLY T568B)

    More information about wiring: Data Communications Cabling FAQ

    Your local store will probably try to charge too much. Shop around for Ethernet cable and connectors. You need the real thing, cable marked "Category 5". Other cable won't work.

    One last thought to those who are new to Ethernet networking. A Hub broadcasts all data to all computers. An Ethernet Switch sends the data only to the computer that where the data will be used. Therefore, switches are faster in cases where the network is sending data between more than one pair of computers at the same time.

    --
    Senator Biden (and Osama bin Laden) say that the Saudi government cannot continue without U.S. support: What should be the Response to Violence?

    --
    Bush's education improvements were
  135. Dark wiring is fine by gregm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wire/coax are cheap if you value your time at all. Don't bother with phone wire, use cat5e for phone lines you get more options this way. Run 2 coax and 3 cat5e to way more places than you ever think you'll want to, but you don't have to actually hook them up right away or ever. Use Panduit Mini-com jacks that can be removed from the cover without unwiring them and just terminate what seems reasonable at the present time. Put blank covers on those places that you're sure you'll never need anything and roll the wires up in the box... you will need to connect something to at least one of those ridiculous wires sometime. I put a cat5 jack out on my front porch last summer so I could sit on the porch swing with my laptop. Will run one out by the pool next summer.

    I like to buy different color cat5s and hook up the blues to ethernet, the reds to phone but leave the yellows dark. Everything should be a star (including security/smoke alarms) and should terminate in a nice large closet that has a big piece of plywood on the wall.

    Use cat5 e for security wiring too. Even though a lot of security systems require their circuit to be wired in series this can still be accomplished at the head and you may want change our your security system at some point. You waste a lot of wire this way but you've got more options. Run 3 cat5e and 2 coax to the detached garage, but if it's very far away run a 4 "conductor" fiber out there too and don't forget to run a string or two in that conduit. Even if it's not so far, the fiber won't pass the electrical potential difference that can occur when lighting strikes close to your garage and you'll save your hubs/switches.

    I've done a lot of this and even by being anal as hell there's always some place I miss. It's not at all unreasonable to put a mile of cat5 in a small house. Also buy as many boxes of wire as your biggest run (most conductors). That way you can run all the wires simultaneously and they'll look better when you're done. Don't pull on the cat5 very hard at all.... if it's stuck get off the ladder or off the floor and gently massage it into place.

    If you stub a conduit up into the attic make damn sure you insulate and seal the top of it. In a factory I wired, the electricians had graciously ran conduit from the attic down all the walls to metal boxes. They left the conduit sticking up through the insulation in the attic so I could stuff/fish my wires down them. They didn't cut them to length up in the attic some were just through the top plate and others were 18" above the insulation. The metal conduit acted like a chimney in the winter, warm air rose up the conduit, hit the cold attic, water condensed, ran back down the conduit and shorted/corroded about 150 jacks (Panuit mini-coms BTW). Ports on the on the phone system began to blow and I couldn't figure out what the hell was happening. Fortunately one of the metal boxes got crushed by a fork truck and I discovered the corroded jack. Upon replacing most of the jacks in the building water actually ran out of some of the boxes when I pulled the covers off.

    In a home where romex electrical wiring is allowed, non-plenum wire should be just fine. Romex is the 12-2 14-3 etc wire that is inside a flatish molded plastic covering. if your building codes won't allow romex and you're house has conduit you better buy the plenum.

    A big UPS in the head is always nice... maybe you should have your electrician run a few "home" runs of 110V to some color coded electrical jacks to get that UPS power up to some of the more deleicate and expensive electronics equipment in your house. Have your electrician put 110V recepticals and light sockets on many of the junction boxes in the attic and crawl/basement... when you have to add a phone line that you forgot you'll be grateful for the handy power and light and it's so inexpensive to do before-hand.

    Run a couple of power home runs to the entertainment center area.... you won't need the amperage but you'll get cleaner power for the tivo.

    That is all.

    No Really that's it.

  136. No good reason to use fiber by eno2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Other than bragging rights, fiber in the home is pointless. Your CAT5 can be used with gigbit ethernet NICs and switches to give you performance that is just as good. Your other alternative is to go with 802.11a (high speed wireless). It's faster than the 11 Megs per second (Approx 54 Mbps) that 802.11b gives you and performs better over longer distances. The money you'd spend on fiber should give you more bang for your buck if you use both of the above mentioned approaches in combination. I wired everything up for CAT5 in my house (14 nodes) and I'm a happy camper.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  137. Re:Fiber is still expensive -- followup by Yokaze · · Score: 2

    >cat6 hasn't been ratified yet, but will allow gigabit and beyond
    AFAIK, there is no beyond.
    Gigabit-ethernet was the last standard for copper.
    The 802.3 will not work on faster copper standards.
    The next standard 802.3ad (10 Gb/s) is fibre-only.

    --
    "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  138. Re:On the other hand... by crucini · · Score: 2

    There is no particular reason to install pull string when the conduit is installed, other than proving the continuity of the conduit. Professional electricians blow the string through with a compressor, or use a fish tape if it's a short run. No competent electrician installs pull string 10 feet at a time as he installs conduit, because any code-compliant conduit installation is fairly easy to string. The main issues in code compliance being: All pull boxes, condolets and junction boxes are accessible, and no more than 360 degrees of bend between access points.

  139. Running phone lines over cat-5 by XNormal · · Score: 2

    Why not just use cat-5 for EVERYTHING, including phones, like many companies do in their offices? It's much more flexible.

    You can either use jacks with both types of connectors or standardize on RJ45 and use RJ11/RJ45 cables to connect your phones. In this case it helps to keep certain conventions like 'top jack is phone, bottom jack is ethernet' but it's also good to be able to break this rule.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  140. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    $1800 per drop! Are you insane? Your company will go broke with you making purchasing decisions.

    We just installed 53 drops of 3M Volition Fiber. This stuff is amazing. You can tie the fibre in knots. The connectors (VF-45) can be yanked out (literally) and replugged hundreds of times without failures. This is in stark contrast to some of the problems experienced with the old-school fibre connections. And to top it off, it's only a bit more than Cat5 per drop.

    Check out the 3M Volition web site for technical details.

    Also, check out Gemflex for some inexpensive 100Mbit network cards and 8-port switches. 3M also sells a line of high-performance Gigabit switches, but they are still out of range for a normal home network.

    To give you an idea, Gemflex pricing is around:
    - $ 90 VF-45 NICs
    - $400 8-port switches
    - $100 RJ-45 to VF-45 converter

    It will be more expensive to build a fiber network, and for a home it may not be worth it. For a small/medium-sized office, however, I think it's a great future-proof option.

  141. Re:Ducts - Air Handling Space by crucini · · Score: 2

    I think the other poster meant wiring duct, such as this Panduit product which is actually a raceway. Your comments, of course, apply to ventilation ducts.

  142. Re:Running wires/fiber etc... by crucini · · Score: 2

    Sometimes it's that easy, and I've done that. Other times the wall includes a "firebreak". This is a piece of 2x4 nailed transversely between the studs, and it can really put a crimp in this plan. The solution is to drill through the firebreak with a diversabit - a long flexible drill bit. Because it's hard to guide the diversabit to the center of the firebreak, you risk breaking out through the drywall.

  143. INNERDUCT - Re:Don't do either yet. by fwc · · Score: 2
    I agree with the posters, but disagree with the steel option.


    I'd pull innerduct or plastic flexible conduit or whatever you want to call it. (If I ask at the electrical supply place for innerduct they know what I am talking about.)


    Essentially, this is a flexible tube, probably about 1" in diameter for your application, which is DESIGNED To have data cable ran in it. I've seen this stuff at home depot but I think they call it something else there. Generally it has ridges or "ripples" circularly around the tube. I have pulled many a wire through metal conduit and have also had my fair share of problems. Recently, people have been using the innderduct instead, and the cables are much easier to pull through, etc.


    Installation is also a breeze. It's a lot more like running a slightly-stiff garden hose than say pipe. You might need to staple/strap it in key spots, and check code requirements. Since it's data, generally you can get away with almost anything.


    Get a spool of Innerduct, a big juction box to connect everything into, and put at least one dual-gang box on each wall, if not more. I've also seen one Innerduct ran to the first one and a second one "jumpering" to a second (or third) box on the wall, so you can actually terminate the wires anywhere you want.


    Once you have the innerduct in, it doesn't matter what you put in it.... Fiber, Coax, CAT5, CAT6, etc. etc. etc.

  144. Some advice... by biglig2 · · Score: 2

    Definately run CAT5 now. Optionally, put dark fibre in next to it. You don't have to use it now, and the cable itself is probably cheap - it's the termination and the net cards that will cost.

    But probably it makes more sense to just run trunking and string so you can pull more stuff later. Who knows, in 5 years we may have wireless at fibre speeds, or sub-ethanet, or be able to run terrabit over CAT-7 copper, or whatever.

    Remember, when running the CAT-5, the first rule of cabling:

    "Put more cable in than you need, because the customer cannot be trusted when she says "I will only ever need x wires to that point". Even if the customer is you!"

    I've just had a day of crimp-tool fun making doublers to run two phone lines down a single CAT-5, largely because the customer did something that was guaranteed as "unthinkable" when we wired the damn site. Should have followed the rule ;-)

    REmember as well that CAT_5 is well established, and so you will be able to get all sorts of interesting baluns to run all sorts of nifty stuff down it.

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  145. No fiber by Mostly+Harmless · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I strongly suggest you do not install fiber. For many reasons. First, fiber is expensive. Second, terminating fiber is expensive. Third, the toold are expensive. Fourth, the NICs and hubs/switches are expensive. Fifth, you can't just "run" fiber. It takes special conduit, or armored fiber. Feel free to contact me with more information.

    --
    "`Ford, you're turning into a penguin. Stop it.'" -Douglas Adams, THHGTTG
    1. Re:No fiber by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      If, for example, you wanted to run Fibre in an older house just to connect two computers that were fairly far apart, would that be worthwhile? Terminating is still an issue, but fibre NICs aren't that incredibly expensive anymore. What kind of ducting would be needed, etc?

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  146. No, you can still do it later by pkesel · · Score: 2, Informative

    As most connected home owners know, you can get cables about anywhere you need them, one way or another. And if you can't, most good electricians can. I've helped my dad, a licensed electrician, do some crazy stuff to get wires where they need to go.

    If you're building a house, put in a wiring closet. Wire all your phone, cableTV, network, and home-theater connections into that location. You can get some fine management stations at most home centers. Make it in a central position in the lower level, and make sure there's a way to get wiring to second floors if necessary. One good way to do that is to put a 3" conduit next to a heat duct or air return or something similar. If you can, put a junction box somewhere on the second floor as well. Whatever the case, extend the conduit through to a junction box in the ceiling. Put several pull strings in alongside the existing cables.

    Also, make sure you have a cable raceway on the ceiling in the basement (if you have one) so that if you finish the lower level you have a way to get cables through the ceiling.

    Most home setups don't use the 10Mb/s to capacity, much less 100Mb/s. Can't see a good reason to even think about fiber yet.

    --
    - Sig this!
  147. here are some tips for structured cabling... by john_uy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i am doing some structured cabling for a campus environment and i would like to share to you some tips that i have learned.

    1. use the highest grade of cable available. use cat6 (even though the standard has not yet been established.) we did a testing and the best cable came from nordx/cdt using their cat6 4800lx cables.

    2. do not put any telephone wire (cat3) cables. cat 5 is backward compatible to cat 4,3,2,1 and of course cat 6 will be for 5,4,3,2,1. but the cat3 cable is not forward compatible to cat6. you can crimp the rj45 on a pair of cat3.

    3. treat the outlet to each room as more of utility. therefore, you should place it as much as you can across the room just like electrical outlets. besides, this is what structured cabling is all about.

    4. i do not suggest that you use stp, this is because you will need to ground each end of the cable or else it will absorb all the interference. stp is used for industrial applications where there are motors, and other interference causing devices. what you do is get a good grade of shielding in the conduit instead.

    5. assign a small room or cabinet in your house that you can centrally terminate the cables with connections to your switches, telco company, cable company, etc.

    6. with regard to safety, use a fire proof coating in the cables but not necessarily plenum. plenum emits toxic substances when burned although it will take extra effort to burn it.

    7. use patch cables. buy the factory made patch cables to terminate to a device at both ends instead of crimping it. it provides the lowest in terms of signal loss.

    8. remember get a certification (these are offered by good manufacturers.) at least you can avail of warranty of parts and labor if anything goes wrong.

    below is just my thoughts in helping you decide in using fiber or copper.

    with regards to fiber, imho, in 10 years time, copper will be obsolete. fiber to the desktop will be as common as cat 5 installations. copper is reaching its limits. the proposed cat7 cable requires shielding in each copper pair and a shielding for the entire cable. the head will no longer be rj45. it will definitely be more expensive than buying fiber optic cables.

    when using fiber optic, since your installation is in a house, you can use the multimode fiber optic cable. you can get the 62.5/125 or 50/125 core. distance is more of the decision what type to get. it depends on the equipment you get (see the specs.) remember that fiber optic should come in pairs. for connection heads, the most common is sc. almost all gigabit uses that with exception to some who use mt-rj.

    imho, i think that nowadays, it is actually cheaper to create fiber optic cables than copper cables because fiber optic is made up of glass and is then made up of sand whereas copper is made from copper and you can actually melt the wires and sell the copper from it than fiber optic. manufacturers are just selling fiber optic for a higher price since it is in high demand in commercial applications (more $$$$.)

    i should say that you may not need all of those information since you are not doing any commercial installation but i believe that when you do something, you must do it good! (besides it should last for 25 years or more.)

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  148. Re:On the other hand... by Erasei · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You should check with your local city building code before doing this. While most places won't have a problem with it, in the village where I live (Chicago area, ~30,000population) any in-wall piping is required to be metal conduit. This is done for fire safety reasons regardless if it is electrical wiring inside or not. Just something to consider.

    --
    visit my free wallpaper collection, wp.erasei.com
  149. Re:fast ethernet and POTS by mpe · · Score: 2

    POTS terminated onto an RJ45 might not be such a good idea because the line voltage will fry a NIC if they used the same hot pair

    Ethernet usually runs on pairs 1&2 (orange) and 3&6 (green). Telephones (at least of the US style variety) have the line on pins 3&4 (RJ11) or 4&5 (RJ45, blue). The only possible complications are two line telephones which use pins 2&5 RJ11 which correspond to pins 3&6 RJ45 for a second line.

  150. Cat5 by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    Actually Cat5 is the requirement. Cat5e "has improved signal carrying capabilities" over Cat5 but aren't required for GigE. 1000Base-T (802.3ab) standards have a complex signal encoding scheme that is very similar to 100Base-T2. It also uses all 4 pairs. My source (besides my own knowledge) is O'Reilly's Ethernet: The Definitive Guide". An excellent read BTW.

  151. Re:Fiber or UTP for Gigabit Ethernet by TheToon · · Score: 2, Informative

    In a new house I woul go for cat7 wire. It has several advantages. First it's certified for gigabit ethernet, secondly the wires are individually shielded. It has 8 wires in each cable and you can easily run two 100Mbps/FDX in one cable.

    --
    //TheToon
  152. Nope by epepke · · Score: 2

    I've wrapped plenum-rated cable around a soldering iron that was hot enough to fry the copper off a board if I wasn't careful (normally ran it through a diode for PC board work). No effect. PVC-insulated cable, on the other hand, roasts and stinks rather quickly.

    Incidentally, "plenum" is not the name of the cable; it's the name of the air space. Literally, it is an air space at higher pressure than the surrounding air space (e.g. for ventilation). However, it has come to mean just about any air space, especially the air space above the ceiling and in walls.

  153. What's So Funny? I'm Doing This by SEGV · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm literally putting the conduit in this weekend. In the future, I can pull whatever cables I want.

    In my living/dining room, which I'm currently rennovating, I'm adding four outlets with conduit to the basement. Each outlet has space for six connectors. Leviton plug-in style. I can run voice, ethernet, cable, speaker, etc.

    I'm just putting a box plate onto the stud and drywall, no actual device box. The wall plate goes on the finished side. Behide is a vapour barrier box, with 1" conduit going out the bottom through the floor.

    Plan for change.

    --

    --
    Marc A. Lepage
    Software Developer
  154. Re:PVC and the environment by Tassach · · Score: 2
    So, if you don't want to use PVC, be my guest, but it's lots more likely I'll die from my own bad habits long before then...


    The issue isn't whether or not PVC cable is dangerous -- it's whether or not it meets code. When you go to sell your house, it will be a real bitch when the home inspector writes you up for building code violations and the buyer's mortgage company makes you tear it all out (or replace it) before they approve the loan. Do the job right the first time and it will increase the value of your home rather than being an expensive liability. Home improvement is NOT the place to go cutting corners -- your home is probably the biggest investment you'll ever make, and only a fool would fail to protect that investment.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  155. Faraday Cage by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
    Don't forget that while the drywall's off is a great time to build a faraday cage around your office.

    No, really. Imagine the potential impact on resale value, especially if organized crime ever moves into your area.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.