Slashdot Mirror


Non-Apple Buttonless Mouse

MX pointed us to a story about a new buttonless mouse. It's visually quite unique, but they say it's not the ideal gaming device for you real-time-gaming folks. But hey, points for style. I've been using this optical cordless logitech (Blatant ThinkGeek linkage) on my desktop for awhile, although I'm not sure how well it'd work for gaming. When I play, I still use a MS Optical mouse. Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice.

215 comments

  1. Tanks by metalhed77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems like it would be good for implementing a targeting system in say tank simulations. Where you can move the mouse to move the tank, and move your hand on the mouse to move the turret. Also good for 3d modeling as they say

    --
    Photos.
  2. All hail the wheel... by joshjs · · Score: 1

    One of the thingks I've missed in the Apple buttonless is the wheel. Once you get used to that little sucker, it's hard to live without him. (Sure, it's a button, I guess, but not one I'd do without...)

    1. Re:All hail the wheel... by dotderf · · Score: 1
      Ever find yourself stroking the spot between the left and right mouse button on a mouse without a wheel?

      Brain: I want to scroll down.

      Hand: Alrighty, Brain!

      Brain: I don't see any scrolling. I think I'm going to cry.

      These buttonless mice look pretty spiffy, but I can't imagine using one to play Quake! I'm SO rough with my mouse. It's so comfy!

    2. Re:All hail the wheel... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2

      Ever find yourself stroking the spot between the left and right mouse button on a mouse without a wheel?

      ALL the time, and practically EVERY time I've got a non-wheel mouse in my hand. I never thought that such a little addition could be so addictive. The first time I was with one, I found it a bit of a nusance. Not 1 day later I had a "normal" mouse in my hand, and found myself rubbing the mouse where the wheel shoud've been.

      I ran into the samething with the M$ Natural Keyboards. There was one sitting around the office that no one wanted to use. I figured "what the hell" and tried it. I yelled at that thing for 2 days straight. I finally got fed up enough and put a "normal" keyboard back on my box. I couldn't use it! After that, I plugged the Natural back in and ordered one for home. I've been using a Natural ever since. That was like 2 years ago. ( I HATE the cursor keys on the newer Naturals, but ALL pain in my wrists totally went away after using the Natural. I think that out-weighs a bit of annoyance (and a few extra times of getting fragged... :-) ).

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    3. Re:All hail the wheel... by painkillr · · Score: 1

      Did you hax0rz the logitech site? Why did it redirect us back to a slashdot page?

    4. Re:All hail the wheel... by painkillr · · Score: 1

      WTF? I chose Poland, and a girl in her bra shows up on the Polish Logitech site.

    5. Re:All hail the wheel... by Nick+Number · · Score: 2

      WTF? I chose Poland, and a girl in her bra shows up on the Polish Logitech site.

      Well, I'll be darned. It doesn't have that pic for any of the other countries, though the German page has a picture of a scantily-clad man and woman lounging under an ad for their iFeel Optical. Verrry subtle.

      --
      Promote proofreading. Don't mod up sloppy posts.
    6. Re:All hail the wheel... by joshjs · · Score: 1

      Very VERY often, actually. I'd pay for one at work just to avoid the annoyance. I'm considering it.

    7. Re:All hail the wheel... by cluening · · Score: 2

      That's one of Micros~1's monopoly tactics: make protocols that are close to normal ones, but just different enough that one can't use both, and make hardware that acts the same! :)

      --
      Posted from the wireless couch.
  3. keyless keyboard by lowtekneq · · Score: 2, Funny

    What? and you don't post my story on the keyless keyboard?

    --
    Carpe meam simiam!
    1. Re:keyless keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess to learn how to use a keyless keyboard, you'd have to go to BOARDING school!

    2. Re:keyless keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was at the newsstand the other day and picked up a crossword puzzle book. It had crossword puzzles without any form. Just a 50x50 grid like graph paper. Part of the puzzle was that you had to decide on where the null squares belong, but if screw up on your guess ... you're f**cked.

    3. Re:keyless keyboard by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
    4. Re:keyless keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /me gives the [RGRNCA] salute

      didn't expect to see you here. ^_^

    5. Re:keyless keyboard by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      /me gives the [RGRNCA] salute
      didn't expect to see you here. ^_^

      Well, I'm not dead yet, and Slashdot still carries some interesting stuff, so, uh, here I am. =)

  4. MS mice by Tet · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I still use a MS Optical mouse. Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice.

    Personally, I've never understood why people are so obsessed with MS mice. There's nothing wrong with them, although I think the ergonomics are sometimes designed for show rather than use. But when Logitech discontinued the Pilot mouse, I went out and bought a whole bunch. I've yet to find anything better. MS mice, and newer Logitech mice all lack a full size middle button, and those with wheels impede the use of the middle button. I've never understood why wheel mice didn't have a traditional three button layout with the wheel on the side, being thumb operated...

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    1. Re:MS mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because it works alot better the way it is, and you probably have hands the size of a gorilla, monkeyman.

    2. Re:MS mice by baptiste · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I have to disagree. While I can't stand MS and the way they behave in the software arena, they can make awesome mice, keyboards, etc. How many of us would give up the wheel? The Intellimouse Explorer 3.0 is hands down the best mouse out there IMHO. It actaully fits my hand, is smooth over any surface, and just has a great 'feel' - plus it looks cool. But even something as plain as a keyboard - their keyboards are still very nice. I always thought shortcut keys on a keyboard were overkill, but now that I use them - I can't live without them (I switch between 2K and Linux and miss the keys when I'm in Linux)

      So I agree with Taco - MS can make a sweet mouse.

    3. Re:MS mice by panthro · · Score: 1

      I still think mouse designers have yet to top the Logitech M-CQ38, triangular tilted 3-button PS/2 ball mouse that works fine for me. A scroll wheel gets in the way, I don't want it, and those elongated-ovoid-shaped mice that seem to dominate the market these days feel like they were designed for E.T.

      --
      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    4. Re:MS mice by Migx · · Score: 1

      optical MS mice are very very nice. In terms of shape and precision. I perssonaly use logitech wireless optical for "work" and razer boomslang 1000 for games. But maybe that's because i've gone anti MS lately :))))

      --
      Migx
    5. Re:MS mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While the scroll wheel at first seemed like a great idea, I found out that it is a real ergonomics disaster. I started getting nasty carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms after using the wheel too much, and went back to using the Apple Pro Mouse that came with my Mac. No more unnatural and highly repetitive finger motions...

    6. Re:MS mice by MattRog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can 'click' the mousewheel. Acts as a perfect 3rd button if you change it in the IntelliPoint software. I'll agree with Taco as well -- MS Mice Rox0r!

      --

      Thanks,
      --
      Matt
    7. Re:MS mice by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      It also works perfectly in X. I have three Logitech cordless desktop (the ones with the "normal looking" keyboard and mouse), and use the third button for paste all the time. The wheel also works in every KDE app with no problem - even better than in Windows, IMO, as the window that you're scrolling dosen't need focus - it just scrolls the pane underneath the pointer.

      Anybody know if the Logitech optical mouses work with the desktops without a seperate reciever? All the keyboards and mice I have "bind" to a reciever, and can then be used in the same room, and can be swapped back and forth (rebind them to a new reciever by hitting connect on both the device and receiever) with no problem. No interference, no crosstalk. These are truely well built pieces of hardware.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    8. Re:MS mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How many of us would give up the wheel?

      I never really understood the appeal of the scroll wheel. I've used mice with them before and it always seemed like a gimmick. I tend to find it much easier to either use the spacebar in a browser or just use the scroll bar - they're certainly much more accurate and provide quicker random access than clicking along with the wheel. Of course, I also tend to use trackball controllers of assorted types because they fit my hands better, require less space, less movement , and usually come with 4 or 5 conveniently placed buttons. I suppose many people feel about trackballs the same way I feel about scroll wheels.

    9. Re:MS mice by Tet · · Score: 1
      How many of us would give up the wheel?

      I've never yet found a use for a wheel on a mouse, so I'd have to raise my hand at this point...

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    10. Re:MS mice by tjwhaynes · · Score: 2

      Why are you missing keys when in Linux? Every key on my keyboard is active including the speaker volume adjust, play, stop (mapped to XMMS), shopping, browser, etc. They all work. You just need to configure them.

      And yes - having shortcut keys is really useful.

      Cheers,
      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    11. Re:MS mice by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Here here! I use an MS Intellimouse Explode at work and it's... OK. I find the body too arched, I don't wan't or need either the scroll wheel or the extra 3 buttons (my model has four) and I don't see any purpose in the "tail light". But, it works OK, mine tracks very well on the table top and - although others in my office behave erratically - the click pressure is about right. I've got to say that the MS mouse actually CREAKS if you squeeze it! WTF? My other mouse is an Apple Pro-Mouse, which I REALLY DO infinitely prefer.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    12. Re:MS mice by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      I use a mouse just as you discribe. It happens to be the puck that came with my Wacom Intuos Tablet. It also has a row of two buttons behind the first.

    13. Re:MS mice by eleven357 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would have to disagree due to the fact that I've previously owned an MS Intellimouse Optical. As far as playing q3a went, the mouse jumped here and there, especially annoying when trying to frag. The funny thing was that I always kept my mouse drivers up to date and I still continued to have this problem with the MS Intellimouse Optical. Thats when I decided to trash the MS mouse and go for a Logitech Dual Optical. Now this Dual Optical mouse is the ideal mouse for any of you FPS fans, since if one laser fails to track, the other laser picks up where the other one stopped tracking. I personally like Logitech's Dual Optical as far as optical mice are concerned. And As far as the smooth surfaces go, the Logitech is also alot smoother, and also seems to be more ergonomically correct for my hand. But I guess it all really boils down to personal preference, so get whatever floats your boat!

    14. Re:MS mice by stretch_jc · · Score: 1

      Mind if i ask how you got those keys active and configured? I have looked for a reasonablt tutorial or how-to and keep coming up with a blank

    15. Re:MS mice by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      I use an MS Intellimouse Optical in Mac OS X (using USB Overdrive to map out the extra buttons).

      I like the mouse as far as the scroll wheel and extra buttons, but I don't care for the shape, it is too arched, and a lot of these mice have a bad problem when they freeze up after a while, forcing me to unplug it for a while. Sometimes this doesn't even work and I have to switch back to the Apple Pro mouse.

      I like the feel of the Apple mouse better... tracks good too, but I miss the scroll wheel and right button, and the MS mouse does creak if you squeeze it! Feels cheap.

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    16. Re:MS mice by IOdine · · Score: 1

      Look here.

      http://www.linux.com/enhance/newsitem.phtml?sid= 1& aid=11801

    17. Re:MS mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Anyone using any sort of "optical" mouse for gaming, isn't really gaming.

      They may be fine and dandy for the casual player but for the highest levels of play you simply can not use an optical mouse. I have not seen a single one that can keep up with the fast movements required for high-level play.

      I really like the Microsoft mouse (non-optical) though. I have never had a single one break (and I've owned/used about 7 of them; some of them are really old). And my mice geat extremely heavy usage, both 3D modelling and game playing.

      I've seen/used tons of broken Logitech mice.

      The middle wheel is awesome. Both for scrolling and game usage. I hate using computers that don't have the wheel, you really get used to using it. The middle click on the wheel works fine, I don't know what the problem is. As for game play, it's great because I can bind a whole bunch of weapons to the mouse and easily switch between them with one hand...

      As for the funky MS mouse shape, I think it fits my hand great, I like the feel better than any other mouse.

      "It's the best Jerry, the best!"

    18. Re:MS mice by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Maybe you shouldn't be using the scroll wheel so much. I've never had any problems with mine, and never know anyone else who has had any problems. I have it set to scroll 5 lines. I dosen't take much effort to scroll down a few comments.
      If I really need to scroll far. I'll just use the scroll bar.
      I find it no more unatural than moving the cursor over to the scroll bar, or uisng the page down key.
      What kind of mouse did you have? The MS one I have, has a very easy to turn wheel. I have noticed that some are quite clicky/sticky/hard. And I could understand getting CTS if you were using one of them.

      My only complaint about the MS Explorer mouse is that it's too damn bulky. It's not something I realised untill I started to use it. I never used to rest my hand on the mouse. Just grip it with my fingers. The ergonomics can get in the way some times because they must expect you to rest your whole hand on it.

    19. Re:MS mice by tjwhaynes · · Score: 2

      Yep - thats the article I read and used. There are lots of symbols already predefined in XFree86 4.x - read the comments on that URL talks about setkbdmap.

      For some tricks you need to make use of utilities like XMMS Pipe to fire commands at XMMS from hotkeys. That way you can bind a key like VolumeUp to a command to send a message to XMMS to raise the volume. Similar tricks can be used with other players (like cymbaline which isn't pretty but has random album play).

      Cheers,
      Toby Haynes

      --
      Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
    20. Re:MS mice by Progoth · · Score: 2, Interesting
      LOL. Anyone using any sort of "optical" mouse for gaming, isn't really gaming.

      Speak for yourself. I have the logitech cordless optical that taco was talking about, and it's fantastic. I had to turn the sensitivity way down because it is so fine-grained, whereas with my ms mouse I had to turn it way up. it never jumps on me, and the resolution is fantastic. I bought some rechargable NiMH batteries, and I have to say that with those it's almost the perfect mouse. The only problem I have with it is that the buttons are too close together, so I can't have 3 fingers on top. but since I usually only use the wheel for reload/zoom/changing weapons, and that in linux the thumb button also maps to B3, it's great.

    21. Re:MS mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check the logitech website, somewhere in the support section they have a grid listing what mice and keyboards are compatible with what recievers.

    22. Re:MS mice by Demanufacture · · Score: 1

      When speaking wrt computers, I'm pretty sure the plural for mouse is mouses, not mice. In a similar vein, the plural for a computer virus is viruses, not virii.

      --
      --- "When you're strange"
    23. Re:MS mice by DRACO- · · Score: 1

      Flip over a ms mouse, most of them are from logitech. Check compaq's mice, same...

      You might even find a few mice and keyboards from lexmark, especially ibm.

      DRACO-

      --
      Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.
    24. Re:MS mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree; I use Logitech Pilots on all of my current machines.

      But with newer machines, I'm not sure what to do. Eventually I'm going to have to buy a new one...it looks like this is going to be fairly soon. I'd like to find a decent USB mouse with (at least) 3 buttons...am I dreaming?

    25. Re:MS mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more unnatural and highly repetitive finger motions...

      Oh, your poor wife!

  5. Logitech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I absolutely LOVE my optical, wireless Logitech mouse, with three buttons plus clickable scroller =] It goes thru about 2 AAs in a month, under more or less constant mousing. I will never go back to wires if I can help it.

    1. Re:Logitech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a side note, I went through TWO MS optical mice before the cords died. Each died after only 3 or so months. The mouse itself was nice - lotsa buttons - but the cables dying that fast it totally unacceptable.

    2. Re:Logitech by xagon7 · · Score: 0

      AMEN brother! I had the MS Intellimouse optical .. and they are just 2 DAMN BIG! I am in mousing heaven with the Logitech optical...lighter and faster.

    3. Re:Logitech by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      As a side note, I went through TWO MS optical mice before the cords died. Each died after only 3 or so months. The mouse itself was nice - lotsa buttons - but the cables dying that fast it totally unacceptable.

      You know I thought it had something to do with the cord! It has that RF choke on the end and always feels like the wire inside is pinched. I'm thinking of trying to replace the wire on mine, because it stops working every so often. I read once if you call MS and complian they will send you a new one.

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    4. Re:Logitech by DRACO- · · Score: 1

      I agree, I have a cordless optical mouse from logitech, but my batteries have lasted me over 2 and 1/2 months, Dec-feb. I havent changed them yet, they are the originals too! :P

      But then again, Im using linux, and not mousing so much.

      DRACO-

      --
      Consider yourself blessed if you are sneezed on by a dragon and only get wet, it could have been a fireball.
  6. Help desk by jACL · · Score: 4, Funny

    User: My mouse doesn't have any buttons? How do I click?
    Helpdesk: Lean left.
    User: What, the buttons are in the seat now?
    Helpdesk: No, lean the mouse left.
    User: But how do I move it around then?
    Helpdesk: Er...put it back.
    User: What if I have to click and drag?
    Helpdesk: Hang on, let me just open up a hardware service ticket.

    --
    "It remains to be seen if the human brain is powerful enough to solve the problems it has created." Dr. Richard Wallace
  7. Not enough memory ... by NWT · · Score: 4, Funny

    Warning: Can't create a new thread (errno 11). If you are not out of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug in /home/sites/site84/web/class_db.php on line 7

    Hehe,it seems their webserver is running on a mouse, too :-)

    --
    Life sucks.
    1. Re:Not enough memory ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHHAHA, it seems like they are running a *NIX OS. Therefore, *NIX OSs suck!! hahahha!

  8. Having looked at the mouse... by Tsar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It appears to me that the mouse still has left-right buttons, but they're in the underside of the mouse body, so you have to tilt the entire body to activate a button by pressing the appropriate corner harder against the desk. Cool, but like the man said, you lose some fine control and quick response time.

  9. Mice and gaming. by jidar · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Yeah you definately wouldn't want to be using a mouse like that for gaming. In fact, even using an optical mouse isn't a good thing if you are competing at the world level.

    What you will find if you look into the Pro gamer community (this might sound like I'm kidding, but it really exists: http://www.shackes.com) is that most of them do not like optical mice. They simply don't have high enough sampling rate in most cases. If you turn fast enough with an optical then tend to freak out for a second resulting in your player staring at the floor or sky and spinning. Also, the movements and physics of using an optical are somewhat different. For instance the 'flick' motion that a lot of players have mastered doesn't translate well to an optical.

    Opticals are nice because of their longevity, and low maintenance, but if you're seriuos then ball is still king.

    --
    Sigs are awesome huh?
    1. Re:Mice and gaming. by Phosphor3k · · Score: 0, Troll

      You've never used a computer before have you? Do you even know what a mouse is?

    2. Re:Mice and gaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would say that the real reason for this is not the inherent superiority of ball mice for gaming but the fact that most very serious (ie Pro and near Pro) gamers learned to play on ball mice. Since the two do feel different, they do not switch for fear of losing some of their edge. Wait for the day when almost all mice are optical - there will be a generation of Pro gamers using them (unless something better comes along first).

    3. Re:Mice and gaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most gamers I know have given up the crappy "Razer" mouse in favor of optical mice. The new MS optical mice sample at 6000 Hz, which is twice what most optical mice use. I'd like to see some stats on which "world level" players don't like optical, because I have a feeling you have no idea what you're talking about.

    4. Re:Mice and gaming. by BobbyK · · Score: 1

      This is actually not true anymore. With the new genration (explorer 3.0, logitech dual optical) alot of pros play with optical especially in Counter-strike (The world champions NIP mostly use explorer 3.0 for an example). Alot of the Quake players are also shifting to optical. http://www.xsreality.com/?a=post&id=16932

    5. Re:Mice and gaming. by debrain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is the genuine issue that your parent message brought up - the sampling rate on optical mice is too low to adequately map the expected motions to interpreted motions, and hence the human user performs operations that the hardware does not interpret as the human expected or anticipated.

      The obvious consequence of this is a sharp flick to the right or left which leads to a Quake 3 character staring at the ground for no apparent reason, and subsequent death and loss of the competition. This can be compensated for with extremely, and I mean extremely, high sensitivity, in the order such that 0.5 cm corresponds to your screen resolution in terms of a desktop.

      However, that being said, the human user does not have the physical coordination to operate at that level. As such, until optical resolutions are significantly higher, users of track balls and ball mice will have superior granularity and better correspondence between the expected behavior of the hardware and the actual behaviour of the hardware, irregardless of the skill, training, and habits of the users.

      The advantage is in the correspondence between expected behaviour and actual behaviour, it being much better with track balls and ball mice (which are optical, but in a different way) than it is with optical mice.

      (Just a note - have a look at trackball patterns; it is not a uniform pattern but a miss-mash pattern with form following function)

      Having been one of, and knowing some of, the better Unreal Tournament players in my time, the differences, in not playability but infinitisemal advantages that lead to domination over a long enough time period, are well known and examined. Optical mice do not require a very long time period to assert their inferiority. ;)

    6. Re:Mice and gaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You truly have no idea what YOU are talking about. The new MS optical mouse is decent. Have you ever attended quake tournaments? Lets see I attend and compete at them regularly. A few people, as in not many at all, have swapped over to the 3.0. Most still play with the ball mice and the ones that did swap to the 3.0 typically used opticals before. To further explain, the ones that used opticals to play generally have very high sensitivity settings. So long or fast movements with the mouse aren't all that necessary. Otherwise almost everyone without super high sensitivities use ball mice.
      More importantly Microsoft mice are overpriced turds. I can't believe all the people in here praising it. If you just read through some of the posts right now you can see how many people have said they've had them break, yet they were happy to get replacements everytime. These mice shouldn't break within two or three years. The teflon feet on Microsoft mouse are pitiful is well. After some hardcore gaming you can fully wear them out in half a year, which really affects the movement. Microsofts in particular do have shoddy construction. A pathetic plastic shell, with no feeling/weight, and a poor shape when compared to logitechs.
      You are clueless and apparently most people in here have not been accustomed to pro gaming. Unless of course they are playing counterstrike. Opticals are used there often, because moving the mouse isn't really required to play that game.

    7. Re:Mice and gaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, counter strike is the minor leagues. :)

    8. Re:Mice and gaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless of course they are playing counterstrike. Opticals are used there often, because moving the mouse isn't really required to play that game.

      ROFL, right on. I personally play quake3 (q3f mod) quite a bit. I stick to my Logitech "Gaming mouse" usb, 3 button, no scroll wheel, ala mouseman '96 style (which I still have one and works, but it's only ps/2 so it has a lower refresh rate). Anyway the gaming mouse is damn nice, I've seen some optical mice and tried them a bit, but I never liked em enough to actually buy one, mostly because I've yet to see an optical mouse with 3 big buttons.

      My housemate on the other hand, uses some optical ms mouse thing for counterstrike... heh

    9. Re:Mice and gaming. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about ~5000dpi. My current optical mouse is ~2000dpi. It doesn't sound all that unreasonable to make something you're talking about. But since the 2000dpi is good enough for most needs, it would be a special product, and gamers might reject it anyway.

    10. Re:Mice and gaming. by debrain · · Score: 2
      It doesn't sound all that unreasonable to make something you're talking about.

      Indeed, it seems that Logitech has attempted to deal with this by using 2 lasers as in the MouseMan (R) Dual Optical, although I could only speculate at the success of this technique.
    11. Re:Mice and gaming. by nanospook · · Score: 1

      The trick with optical mouse's is to avoid the wireless. Since they contain their own power supply and transmitters, they are simply too heavy. Try gaming with a brick! The Logitech optical (with wires) is so light and accurate that gaming with it is a breeze. Unfortunately as others have stated, the middle button is a wheel and basically a pain in the ass.

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    12. Re:Mice and gaming. by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I don't know about anyone else but I learned on arcade joystick quarterpumpers and frankly I can't stand playing games with a mouse. I think you've got a good point about 'when everyone learns on optical mice.' Frankly I've always thought a real arcade style control system was the way to go for any serious gaming. Using a force feedback wheel for racing. Using a force feedback yoke for flight sims. Using the classic arcade stick for most games, and a roller controller for the some odd games.
      Although by the time 'optical' mice have replaced wheeled ones I'm sure the issues current opticals have will be resolved.

  10. Microsoft's mice by stevie-boy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice.

    I replaced the hideous 'pebble' supplied with my iMac with an MS optical wheel mouse, it's probably the best £30 I've spent on computing kit.

    The Classic MacOS drivers for the extra button and scrolly wheel work without incident and MacOSX has support built in.

  11. Left-handed mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any left-handed mice out there for use strictly as a gaming device (one that can be used at the same time as a right-handed mouse)? Preferably one with lots of buttons. I have always wanted to be able to control both movement and aiming with mice. I've tried joysticks but they just don't cut it. If I had a mouse in each hand with eight to ten buttons on each mouse, I could stop using the keyboard for gaming.

    1. Re:Left-handed mice by jx100 · · Score: 1

      Well, you might want to look at the Microsoft Sidewinder Strategic Commander

  12. my thoughts exactly. by gimpboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice.

    i say the same about nike. who cares if small asian children work 16 hours a day for almost nothing-they sure make good shoes. really though it's called having principles. if you think a company is bad, for whatever reason, you shouldnt do business with that company-not just the part of the company you disagree with.

    mod me down if you want, but i personally dont appreciate the hypocrisy.

    --
    -- john
    1. Re:my thoughts exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the thing is, you are probably just as morally bankrupt as ol' bill, but you're just jealous that you don't have his billions. until you are jesus christ, get out of pulpit.

    2. Re:my thoughts exactly. by JWhitlock · · Score: 5, Insightful
      i say the same about nike. who cares if small asian children work 16 hours a day for almost nothing-they sure make good shoes. really though it's called having principles. if you think a company is bad, for whatever reason, you shouldnt do business with that company-not just the part of the company you disagree with.

      WHOA! How about a little perspective, huh? Is Microsoft doing anything on the level of exploiting third-world children? Sure, they've been convicted of operating an illegal monopoly, but the only folks that got hurt were those trying to sell software of their own. Is this the principle you are trying to follow - fair competition in a regulated market? Does that mean your principles lead you to buy third-party software? Or is your principle that software should be free, and thus you don't care about those other businesses that were shut out? I must admit, I'm not sure what you are talking about, and I can't wrap my brain around any principle that lumps Microsoft's "business practices and operating systems" with Nike's treatment of third-world workers. Or, are you commenting that Nike's new initiatives to help third-world workers are comparable to Microsoft's new initiatives to fix security problems?

      Personally, I'm quite happy about Microsoft's business practices - they resulted in cheap PCs (every PC didn't have to meet IBM's specs, just Microsoft's) and angry programmers, which directly resulted in the Linux operating system. Linux may be putting a free operating system in every computer, but Microsoft put those computers on people's desks - they are like the ugly booster rockets that put the shuttle in orbit.

      BTW, horrible link to NIKEWORKERS.ORG. Like your comments, it assumes everything (that you agree that Nike exploits third-world workers) and explains nothing (no examples of Nike's exploitation). In fact, the only stories in the ABOUT section were old articles about paid endorsers that didn't know about the problems, and the only links in the NEWS section were about Reebok! This would have been a better link.

    3. Re:my thoughts exactly. by cl0secall · · Score: 1
      i dunno why i'm even replying to this... its not my fight.
      I must admit, I'm not sure what you are talking about

      he says it right here:

      if you think a company is bad, for whatever reason, you shouldnt do business with that company-not just the part of the company you disagree with.

      btw, nicely assembled troll. You should meet these guys. (See what I mean here.)

      --
      Model 551, Chambered in 6mm
    4. Re:my thoughts exactly. by //violentmac · · Score: 1

      I normally don't reply to posts. But your post was brilliant. Bravo!

      It takes guts to take the kind of stand you did.

      --
      --------

      get jiggy w/ ayn rand!

    5. Re:my thoughts exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monopolies aren't illegal, nor is operating one.

    6. Re:my thoughts exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Microsoft doing anything on the level of exploiting third-world children?
      Gates: Steve one of our employees just e-mailed me and asked if we were exploiting any third world children.
      Balmer: No we're not, why do you ask?
      Gates: Why aren't we?!? How are we supposed to overcharge consumers and undercut our competitors if we're not exploiting third world child labor?
      Balmer: When you put it that way I'll put marketing on it right away, I'm sure they can learn to write for .net or VB, and have them coding 16 hours a day for under $1.

    7. Re:my thoughts exactly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you work on something for many years and MS come along and squish it, what's the result? No financial gain, many wasted years.. You may as well have been working for $1/day in a sweat shop.

  13. ruh roh... by acm · · Score: 1

    Warning: Can't create a new thread (errno 11). If you are not out of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug in /home/sites/site84/web/class_db.php on line 7

    Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Can't create a new thread (errno 11). If you are not out of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug in /home/sites/site84/web/class_db.php on line 7

    ERROR: Unable to connect to database.

    1. Re:ruh roh... by Kubik+-+The+Original · · Score: 1

      I hope that this guy was being sarcastic...

      "They should really use RealMedia by Sierra Online instead of Quicktime made by ID Software..."

    2. Re:ruh roh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumbass, Realmedia is made by apple as well. And the only good thing that ID software ever did was that crappy game called unreal. Get our facts straight lorser. kekeke ^_^

    3. Re:ruh roh... by Kubik+-+The+Original · · Score: 0

      Obviously you have never heard of sarcasm... Besides, do you even know that Sierra is a gaming company???

  14. cross refrencing sneaky advertising? by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 1

    is it me, or are there little OSDN hints in the stories?

    the more than obvious ones, the 'here's an OSDN link' ... or check this out from our partner ...

    is it me, or is this a new thing? we all know /. is part of OSDN, but why make it extremely obvious/annoying?

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    1. Re:cross refrencing sneaky advertising? by Grax · · Score: 1

      I think they're trying to do full disclosure so they won't be excused of sneaking in OSDN links.

    2. Re:cross refrencing sneaky advertising? by verch · · Score: 1

      Why? Maybe because they are a business and businesses (despite what people like RMS and ESR might tell you) need to create revenue to stay alive? /. is one of the most visited sites on the net (I have no facts to back this up, but its popular anyway) so why wouldn't they throw in a link to one of their own sites every now and then for a bit of free self advertising? Its not sneaky, or in my opinion all that annoying, its just good business.

    3. Re:cross refrencing sneaky advertising? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2

      Could you please link to the relevant statements from RMS and ESR stating that they aren't in favour of people making money. I must have missed them.

  15. Lovin' Apple's by piecewise · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple's buttonless, (beautiful), optical mouse has been great for me. They say Macs are more productive computers because of the user interface.. I agree.. but I must admit I wasted a lot of time originally just looking at this thing.. it's weird.. the inside of it appears to "float". You can't tell this in pictures but in 'real life' it seems to float. It reminds me of mercury actually, in a sense. The Apple logo inside, especially, floats within it. It's a really great mouse.. and it's connected to a G4 tower, so that ain't bad either!

    Wow, I'm talking about *nothing* and I've still developed a paragraph! Much like my english papers. I'm done now...

    --
    The next comment I write will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    1. Re:Lovin' Apple's by green+pizza · · Score: 2

      it's weird.. the inside of it appears to
      "float"


      hehe, yeah, I've noticed that too... it looks like a polished piece of black stone suspended within the mouse... the keyboard is sort of that way as well... funky mostly-clear styling, with the wires and chips somehow hidden. Neat stuff! My desk is pretty wild with my Apple LCD, keyboard, and mouse... plus my "speckled granite" Silicon Graphics 21" CRT, keyboard, and mouse.

    2. Re:Lovin' Apple's by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      why on Earth did SGI get rid of their "speckled granite" monitor and keyboard finish? not to mention their wonderful old "hypercube" logo. such a shame - maybe they'll bring back the logo when they're profitable again.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Lovin' Apple's by green+pizza · · Score: 2

      why on Earth did SGI get rid of their "speckled granite" monitor and keyboard finish

      No kidding, nothing says "Dell" like a black monitor/keys/mouse setup and "sgi" in lame white paint. Ugh. Thankfully the Octane2 (and maybe the Fuel) work fine with existing granite accessories. Too bad there was never a granite FD Trinitron monitor.

    4. Re:Lovin' Apple's by Seehund · · Score: 1

      I agree, Apple's "Pro" mouse is pretty to look at, but I hate to use it (I still prefer it over my Powerbook's trackpad or iMac puck style "mouse" though).
      Not only is it worthless in the same aspect as other Mac mice, i.e. the single "button" (or in this case, switch), but the "flipping the whole top" operation instead of clicking a button separate from the mouse chassis takes away any possible advantage of the much touted ability of using the mouse on "any" surface. You still need a hard and flat surface, otherwise the whole mouse will follow your clicking and you'll have to increase your pressure accordingly. For example, right now I'm in bed watching TV with the Powerbook in my knees, and the Pro mouse tracks perfectly on my sheets, but instead of just clicking a mouse button I have to push the whole lump of transparent plastic a couple of cm down into the mattress.

      The best kind of mouse I have used so far is the Wizard 3-button mice for my Amigas. Precise and fast movement plus exactly the right sensitivity and feedback of the buttons. A scroll wheel is unnecessary with this mouse, just hold the middle button and drag - much better control than a wheel.

      The MS Intellimouse comes in second here.

      Since the link to this new mouse is slashdotted it's a bit hard to see if it's a better concept than Apple's Pro mouse.

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  16. Microsoft Hardware by neema · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice."

    Difference being is this. Microsoft software is made, mostly, within Microsoft. Microsoft hardware is hardware someone else makes and they just slap on a label onto it.

    Microsoft hardware is actually really good, and the support for it is amazing. My optical mouse was tweaking out for some reason, so I called them and they sent me another one by the next day. They didn't require me to send in my old one. It probably didn't cost them much anyway, but it was still a cool gesture.

    1. Re:Microsoft Hardware by ianezz · · Score: 2
      Microsoft hardware is actually really good

      It may be true about mice and joysticks, but the keyboards they resell are really of the ``el cheapo'' kind. Nothing really comparable to a good old IBM PS/2 (see here and here) or a Keytronic (see here).

    2. Re:Microsoft Hardware by khang · · Score: 1

      Probably the main reason why Microsoft invests a lot of money into making good keyboards and mice and other accessories is that it's just another place for them to advertise their logo on your desk.

      --
      -khang
    3. Re:Microsoft Hardware by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

      As soon as i read this comment, i took out my trusty chef's knife and cleared the M$-Logo from my Intellimouse Optical. I needed 10 seconds to remove the logo.

      How long does it take to do the same to any other M$-Product?

      --
      ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
    4. Re:Microsoft Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just violated the DMCA. Go to jail. Do not pass go. Do not collect $200.

    5. Re:Microsoft Hardware by yesthatguy · · Score: 1

      Well, I just grabbed my knife and tried to get the logo off of my Windows startup screen. Unfortunately, as soon as I got the hole in the glass to get access to it, my monitor started futzing out on me. So now the logo's gone, but not because I cut it out.

      Cutting it out of the retail packaging, on the other hand, went rather smoothly. So I'm 1 for 2.

      --
      Yes! That guy!
    6. Re:Microsoft Hardware by oyenstikker · · Score: 1

      I own a Microsoft mouse and keyboard. But its okay, I scraped the Microsoft logos off with a razor blade.

      No, I'm not joking. ;)

      --
      The masses are the crack whores of religion.
    7. Re:Microsoft Hardware by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 1

      Heh... at least on the rev. 2 IM Optical, you can remove the M$ logo with a pencil eraser. Looks better than cutting it off with a knife, I'd think.

      --
      Want Linux games? HERE.
    8. Re:Microsoft Hardware by theancient2 · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't be a shock to anyone that a company can be better in one area than it is in others. Microsoft is not one giant entity in which Bill Gates does everything from coding Windows to designing the mouse -- there are multiple divisions, each with its own management team, employees, QA practices, and so on. Some of those may be better than others.

      Anyway, enough about that.

      One story I heard was that someone at thought everyone else's hardware sucked, so they said, "we've got money, we can build our own." My experience with hardware 10 years ago was about the same. My first computer went through three mice of three different brands in about a year. Then we bought a Microsoft mouse. It was more expensive, but it had a good warranty. I took it apart (of course), and could see that the mechanical components were designed much more solidly. Ten years later, that mouse is still in service. (I haven't examined a Logitech mouse since the one that died, so it's possible that they've improved their design since then.)

      The experience with keyboards has been the same. We went through three keyboards. We didn't go through them as quickly as we went though mice, they didn't last more than a year each. (Although in all fairness, one of those was lost to spilled Coke, not to wear.) Then, we paid a bit more money on a Microsoft Natural keyboard. It's still going, too.

      I've been using the optical mouse (high-end model) since it came out a couple years ago. I haven't had problems with quick movements in most games, but then again I'm not a very "l33t gamer." (The only game that gave me a problem was that "spank the monkey" flash game that came out a few months ago. It couldn't move such a large distance so fast.)

    9. Re:Microsoft Hardware by grumbly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Difference being is this. Microsoft software is made, mostly, within Microsoft. Microsoft hardware is hardware someone else makes and they just slap on a label onto it.

      Ohhh.. SO close. You are almost correct in saying that someone else makes but what you really mean is that someone else manufactures it. MS does all its hardware design in house (mice, keyboards, joysticks, games pads...) and then subcontracts out the manufacturing.

    10. Re:Microsoft Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My god you Linux people scare me.

      Oh no! I bought a Microsoft product! The logo burns my eyes! It must be removed!

  17. just 800dpi Taco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your ass is mine in Quake3 with this baby:
    rawr

  18. It's been done by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Funny
    Buttonless mice have been available for ages. This is not a new thing.

    Check it out.

  19. MS Intellimouse Explorer by snillfisk · · Score: 1

    While 'bloated' with the explorer-name, i really enjoy the feel of the mouse .. it fits nicely in my palm and the 3.0-version has better update (which was a small problem with the first version, at least when doing fps-gaming and you suddenly wanted to turn all the way around) ..

    The 3.0 is also a bit "lower" than the previous version (1.0) and looks more logitechish .. i'd recommend it for anyone looking for a good, optical mouse.. the only problem is that they've moved the 'next/prev' buttons since 1.0, so i press them accidently from time to time ..

    and .. it doesnt bluescreen. there's a red flare, however.

    --
    mats
    One man's ceiling is another man's floor.
  20. likes and dislikes by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

    I must admit as well that microsoft does well in the interface device category. I happen to be fond of their joysticks. But, Logitech always seems to make their mice and keyboard better and for gamepads I've always got to go with a Gravis.

    --
    - /* dead coders leave no comments */
  21. MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by penguin_nipple · · Score: 5, Informative
    Ever since I first saw them, I have oned a few MS Optical Mice. For some reason, MS Hardware is damn fine division. I had a faulty Intellimouse Optical, got a new one replaced, no charge. Had the smaller white one faulty, replaced, no charge. I now own 2 of the small, one of the large Grey ones...love my technical referrals? I also own the Logitech cordless optical mouse and cordless keyboard. First off , Optical is the way to go. Secondly, MS is good at hardware. Thirdly, Support is great for both W2K and Linux, no hassles anywhere. Except for programming those extra buttons for the logitech keyboard in Linux. Oh well, maybe someday I'll figure out the keycodes and write a little hack to make the buttons work.

    I would like to try this no button mouse, when I am working (coding) I occassionally get serious serious hand pain (no jokes..lol).

    It will last for days and is quite painful. All of us in tech jobs, spending long hours at computers should take a serious look at ergonomics. Also, your employer should pay for upgrading your chair, keyboard and mouse if you feel pain with your current setup. It's your health, your future, hell, go out and buy what you want and throw the bill at your boss if you're in pain (not literally throw it, figuratively). I would in fact suggest sitting down with your employer and going over ergonomics and how it can effect employee productivity.

    Maybe some of these links would be helpful:

    Design/Layout
    Ergonomics - A Practical Guide
    Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Computer Related Repetitive Strain Injuries

    I am gonna buy one, the tiny little muscles used in your hands to click the mice buttons place a huge strain on your arm over a period of time. It may not bother you now, but let's talk in 20 years....

    1. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by ideut · · Score: 1
      Oh well, maybe someday I'll figure out the keycodes and write a little hack to make the buttons work.

      Use xev to find out the keycodes. Then use xmodmap to give them keysyms (choose names from /usr/X11R6/include/X11/keysymdef.h). There are applications to assign arbitrary commands to keysyms. Some window managers (eg sawfish) have this built in.

      --

      --

    2. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by IceFox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Before you blast me, here me out. I had wrist problems and tried a number of different mice. I have a little collection of mice in storage now. You know what one did more (for my wrists that is) then any other one? A trackball. And when you think about it you can relize why. With a normal mouse you mover your wrist all around, but with a trackball you use your thumb for everything. This drematicly reduces the amount of stress on your wrists. Granted it took me two weeks to be able to master it and another month to get my gimp skills back, but it was worth it. Unfortunetly for you lefties it is a little harder to find a trackball, but give it a shot.

      As for keyboard I ended up getting a Kinesis, but that is for another post.

      As for desk I built my own to match my height so my wrists are in the least amount of pain. (90 angle at elbo)

      -Benjamin Meyer

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    3. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by onShore_Jake · · Score: 1

      Kookyness. First you say: For some reason, MS Hardware is damn fine division
      then you mention: I had a faulty Intellimouse,
      then, as if one failed unit wasn't enuff, you Had the smaller white one faulty.
      Hmmm... what fine examples of a "superior mouse"

    4. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by penguin_nipple · · Score: 2
      Superior in terms of overall usage, comfort level and my personal opinion. Sure hardware sometime goes out faulty (little loose wires etc). Superior customer service, a phone call and reciept cleared up the problem. They paid for shipping and sent me a brand new mouse. This is the real world, things happen and sometimes hardware is defective. The question then comes down to, how does the company treat me as a customer if there is a problem? No horror story here, they were excellent. Now well more than a year later, all mice still run perfectly.

      Might have been a bit vague, but I thought my point was made, sorry if it was not.

      Still goes to my end point, the hardware is great. If something happens and it breaks due to manufacturer defect, they should replace it, and they did. So yes, it is a fine example.

      I'm just sitting here wondering why you come off sounding like a knob?

    5. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      look for funkeys kernel patch

    6. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by penguin_nipple · · Score: 2

      Cool, last time I tried to mess with keyboard mappings was when I had my iBook...thanks for the info!

    7. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by penguin_nipple · · Score: 2

      I have never actually gone the way of the trackball. Whenever I tried them, they did the same as you say, felt clunky and I just couldn't get myself to adjust. If I do stuff in the gimp or any other image editing type app, I'll fall back to my Wacom writing tablet. After using a tablet, mice seem really crude. But I might try out a trackball, since they aren't all together too expensive...

    8. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by chihowa · · Score: 1

      I think trackballs are great. Often at work I'd have to go back to a mouse, and it'd feel very klunky. Moving the curson in very fine increments seems so much easier with them as well. I suppose this makes quite a bit of sense... you are moving the cursor with your fingers instead of your whole arm.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    9. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by abreauj · · Score: 1
      Thirdly, Support is great for both W2K and Linux, no hassles anywhere. Except for programming those extra buttons for the logitech keyboard in Linux. Oh well, maybe someday I'll figure out the keycodes and write a little hack to make the buttons work.

      Actually, they're already defined in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XKeysymDB:

      • XF86AudioLowerVolume :1008FF11
      • XF86AudioMute :1008FF12
      • XF86AudioRaiseVolume :1008FF13
      • XF86AudioPlay :1008FF14
      • XF86AudioStop :1008FF15
      • XF86AudioPrev :1008FF16
      • XF86AudioNext :1008FF17
      • XF86HomePage :1008FF18
      • XF86Mail :1008FF19
      • XF86Start :1008FF1A
      • XF86Search :1008FF1B
      • XF86AudioRecord :1008FF1C
      • XF86Calculator :1008FF1D
      • XF86Memo :1008FF1E
      • XF86ToDoList :1008FF1F
      • XF86Calendar :1008FF20
      • XF86PowerDown :1008FF21
      • ...

      Under the Sawfish window manager, the Shortcuts control panel lets you define functions for the keys. Most of the options are for Window-Manager functions, but the "Run shell command" binding is available for anything you can run at the command-line.

    10. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by boopus · · Score: 2

      I'll seccond the Trackball! I've had most versions logitech has made in the past ten years, and every one has been worth the (sometimes) expensive price. I'm currently using the Wireless Optical Trackball, and it makes all the difference. Want to read slashdot? Lean back your chair back, put your feet up, and hold your mouse on your lap and really relax. It's well worth the double AA battery each month.

      There does seem to be a learning curve for them, but unfortunatly I can't comment as I was young enough that "it just seemed natural" to start using it. As long as you've got something else for gaming(and in the days of USB, you aren't limited to just one pointing device), I really recomend them.

    11. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by rabidcow · · Score: 2

      Not everyone can use a trackball, at least without a lot of training. It requires a great degree of motor control in the thumb that some of us just don't have.

      For me at least, using a trackball is like typing with my elbows.

    12. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.mousetool.com

      i use win2k so i don't know how good the linux version is. the windows versoin is excellent, however. i hardly ever use the buttons any more.

    13. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by macosxaddict · · Score: 1

      How is this evidence of a good hardware division? Of course they replaced the defective mouse - any manufacturer would do that, but a good manufacturer wouldn't have shipped the faulty mouse in the first place. And isn't it possible that your "superior" mouse is the cause of your RSI?

    14. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by penguin_nipple · · Score: 2
      Possible that that's the cause, but let's be realistic here. I also owned a Blueberry iBook, had it for about 20 months and an internal IDE cable broke on it. It didn't physically break, every OS on the face of the planet would simply not recognize any HD at all. Apple wanted a crapload of $$ for a repair, 500US just to look at it.

      Now, I wouldn't go and jump on any bandwagon and start saying Apple makes *crap*, because I think they make good stuff. I still have my original Apple //c downstairs from when I was younger and it's still working. I was highly disappointed that Apple wanted so much just to pop it open and look.

      Anyhow, when I mentioned 'superior', it has been superior in terms of usability and comfort compared to anything I have used. Now the trackball has come up, I'll try it. I already mentioned the Wacom Tablet. So, yes, the large grey intellimouse has been the best so far, but hey, I'm not closed minded about trying new things. Unlike many who would love to bash the intellimouse line and hardware simply because it is somehow associated with MSFT. But then again, this is slashdot.

    15. Re:MS Makes a superior Mouse & Ergonomics by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      RE: Hand Pain

      Have you looked into the various kinds of trackballs out there? I had hand/wrist pain and since switching to one of those curved (ergo) keyboards and a MS Trackball Explorer (its optical too) my pain has dropped to almost nothing. It takes about a week of use to really get comfortable with the new setup, but its really nice once you do.

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  22. /. ed by kevinqtipreedy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow it seems like whenever there is a good story not on cnet.com only the first 3 people can get to it. It takes 5 people to make a conspiracy: slashdot, osdn, the site that gets ./ed, me, and you. There is only one solution, well besides everyone upgrading hardware/bandwidth incase they get slashdoted, and thats to get even. What goes around comes around, so we should all slashdot slashdot. So everyone follow this link check out this awesome story online at http://www.slashdot.org !!!!!!

  23. Check out the manufacturer's page... by Twiki · · Score: 1

    While this story gets hammered. You can visit them here.

    --
    mySig
  24. MySql Error when loading page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So much for the "it's scaleable" argument.

  25. not to be nitpicky... by lanclos · · Score: 1
    "Whatever anyone thinks about their business practices and operating systems, they sure seem to always sell good mice."
    I beg to differ. Microsoft Products always follow a distinct cycle: release the first (frequently bad) rev, and evolve it from there. It's like an iterative approximation algorithm. Compare Windows 2.0 to Windows98, or IE 3.0 to IE 5.5; while the overall shape is largely similar, the finer points have evolved substantially, such that the product became something that people were willing to use, and not simply avoid.

    I owned one of the first Microsoft mice, by sheer chance. They're still shaped the same way now as they were back then, but the mouse I had was fully dead within 12 months. Since then, they've evolved the product substantially, to something that many people tout as the holy grail of mice.

    I have a personal preference for Logitech optical trackballs, and haven't used any MS mice since my first one died (it really was that shoddy of a product). It's also my personal belief that Microsoft takes their "evolution" process too far, and throws in too many features at the expense of stability and longevity. Note that I draw no comparisons to WinXP or IE 6.
    1. Re:not to be nitpicky... by jefflinwood · · Score: 1

      How long ago did you own that "first microsoft mouse"? My dad had this old clicky Microsoft Mouse for his IBM XT, probably circa 1986-87. I don't think I'd describe it as shaped the same way they are now - it wasn't ergonomic at all. And the two buttons on it hurt your wrist to use.

      By the time Windows 3.1 came out, the MS mice were more like todays modern mouse. I think they were usually bundled with a copy of Win3.1.

    2. Re:not to be nitpicky... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The fact that older mice weren't as nice as the newer mice are doesn't demonstrate anything. The point is that Microsoft has always offered a mouse that was, if not always the best, at least in the top three of what was available at the time. Any other comparison is unfair.

      Incidentally, I have a bunch of older MS mice, many over 10 years old, that still work fine. The only reason I don't use them is that the Wireless Intellimouse Explorer has obsoleted them.

  26. Should be rats not mice by jonathanjg · · Score: 2, Troll

    I still contend that such products although good, should still be referred to as "microsoft rats"!

    1. Re:Should be rats not mice by Fweeky · · Score: 2

      Why? Rats are smarter, cleaner, less smelly and make much better pets than mice.

      Oh, wait, Microsoft mice rule, rats rule.. I see it now :)

  27. WARNING! Do not click! Filthy pr0n redirect! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  28. Gaming mice by MickyJ · · Score: 1

    Optical mice aren't too good for FPS style games. They always 'slip' if you move them too quickly (you end up looking down - not too good when trying to shoot someone before you kill you).

    A good solid ye olde ball mouse is very good. I highly recommed the Logitech WingMan Gaming Mouse (if you can find one). With the shoot, jump, reload style of games, you need 3 buttons minimum.

    1. Re:Gaming mice by MickyJ · · Score: 1

      Oh plop. Preview before posting. I meant before he kills you...doh!

    2. Re:Gaming mice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never had a problem with "slippage" using my IBM Optical mouse. You just arn't picking quality mice ;)

  29. MS Mouse ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I play, I still use a MS Optical mouse

    All this time you've been yelling about how evil microsoft is, and yet you're still supporting them by using their product ?

    My fucking God taco! You're a bloody hypocrite!

  30. iMac Mice by PoiBoy · · Score: 1
    Slightly OT, but one thing really has me bothered...

    Why didn't Apple use a wireless keyboard and mouse on its new iMacs? It seems to me that the entire beauty of the machine is completely ruined by having to look at these cables.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:iMac Mice by zome · · Score: 1

      If they did so, they'll never sold the new iMAc to any school or public places. Mouse is so small, too easy to pick up and take home.

      At my collage, we had a new wireless mouse in our presentation room, it last 2 days before someone took it. I guess it ended up on eBay already.

    2. Re:iMac Mice by JPRelph · · Score: 1

      Its true about them being easy to pick up if used in public places, but there is also the point that they'd either have to have AA batteries inside them, or have them plug in to recharge. The new iMac is Apple's consumer machine, its simple and uncomplicated. Its designed to be easy to use, and I think that a lot of potential iMac owners out there would get sick very quickly of replacing the batteries. If they were rechargeable via USB you could guarantee that 90% of people would just leave them plugged in all the time. So it would be extra expense for Apple, and I think that the majority of consumers are happy with mice that don't mean you have to keep a stock of spare batteries in the computer desk.

    3. Re:iMac Mice by Stenpas · · Score: 1
      I just can't resist. There are some good stories involving the mice at my school. In one lab with the hockeypuck mice, students like to move them to different computers because they like the color better. Some students just switch a puck with an optical, and we've had students steal optical mice. Those things cost the school $40 each! And sometimes we find mice on the floor, or with the ball taken out. The real killer is when the ring that seals the mouse ball in the mouse is taken. It's easier to just buy a new mouse rather than get a replacement for the ring. We also have a lot of students who like to try to blind themselves with the optical mice.

      For the grand finale of "crazy students and their mice", you have to know what the Apple hockeypucks look like. They're circular with little plastic plating on the sides that matches the color of the imac. So I walk into a lab that I don't go in too often, and the plastic plating was switched on at least 10 mice! Whoever did it preferred their mice to have purple and pink plating. After trying to dismantle the plating on an expendible puck I have, to no surprise, the plating is glued on. Whoever did it would have have to spent hours with a scalpal to cut/pry it off and a few more hours to glue it back together. It was done with quality in mind during the whole process. It felt just like a real Apple mouse.

  31. wheel/middle button by kriebz · · Score: 1

    Usualy the wheel can click, acting as the middle button. This can cause problems if you are prone to rolling the wheel while trying to press it. I have Taco's Logitech mouse (or the same model, rather) and the fourth button, on the thumb, is also a "middle button". This solves the above issue. The fact that this is /all/ I can get the fourth button to do is my failure to configure linux.
    My favorite mouse ever was my Logitech Series 9, which went into spasms and had to be removed from service. I plan to replace its guts with a wheel mouse some day, giving it every feature I want.

  32. Blatant Think Geek link by Spankophile · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Taco actually bought his mouse through them to show his support, or if he goes to ... We need more sousveillance!!

  33. I'm living in the past by Nall · · Score: 1

    I'm still on my good ol' Logitech serial mouse. Sadly, this thing is more reliable then any other mouse i've come in contact with, as they have resulted in either breaking, or they died out on me while playing Age of Empires.

    You woudn't belive how much it sucked sending in a huge horse archer army against someone online and then having your mouse die out on you.

  34. About the Logitech mouse.. by dmouritsendk · · Score: 1

    The Cordless Mouseman Optical(that mr. Taco is using on his desktop..) arent great for gaming, because it(like all other cordlesses) sometimes have problems when you get REALLY "twitchy"(when u make 200 differnt moves in 5sec. Tonyhawk is a really twitchy game.. so is counterstrike(which might be a better example since were talking mice here :)) in a game.

    I have a Cordless Mouseman Optical, but Since ive got my USB Optical Wheelmouse (also logitech). It have been pluged into my game maschine, since the USB still are more reliable.. BUT, i must say, Ive found the Logitec cordless Mouseman Optical is one of the most stable cordless ive have tried yet. I also own a MS Cordless and the logitec is, in my experice, WAY more stable.. But MS knows this i think, they warn you on the mouses product page: MS productpage , Wireless freedom, Microsoft reliability LMAO ;O)

    BUT, dear mr. Tacodude.. Ur are rich and everything, go get the new Mouseman Dual Optical, it has a tail(hence stable in games), and two optic eyes(hence 1600DPI res).. Havent tried one yet.. but they should be GREAT for gaming.. :O)

  35. Focus, people! :-) by seldolivaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Taco posts a story about a new mouse, and includes a one-line comment mentioning MS Mice. Result: a thread of replies almost entirely about Microsoft mice, Microsoft hardware, and MS's business practices. And 3 about the actual mouse :-)

    1. Re:Focus, people! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful ?
      The site is fubared, so noone can make valid comments anyway.

    2. Re:Focus, people! :-) by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

      Well, Taco has a good point though!

      I hate Microsoft with a passion. I run Linux.

      However, I have a Microsoft mouse, and I have to admit it's a fine mouse! It's well designed, comfrotable, reliable, never sticks or anything.

      Windows is of course pure shit.

    3. Re:Focus, people! :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taco's paying off the engagement ring and saving up for his wedding. Slagging off Microsoft is a known banner-ad money-maker here.

  36. Re:Help, I'm stuck in jail! by October_30th · · Score: 0
    Good work in Hague this week, Slobo.

    However, shouldn't you be busy preparing your defense instead of trolling on Slashdot? Have you heard anything from Bill Clinton? Is he going to testify?

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  37. That's it !! by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'm kicking my /.addiction. I'm never visting this site again:
    When I play, I still use a MS Optical mouse.

    I guess the preposal took a lot of guts but admitting using M$-products is just plain stupid.

    1. Re:That's it !! by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Common, that's not flamebait. Maybe a bit dumb and not quite funny, but certainly not flamebait

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:That's it !! by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

      I thought so too..
      it was supposed to be funny, but it's just to easy...

      The constant bashing of Micros~1 is just part of life on /. , the beowulf thing is also getting old but it can be funny at times.

      Oh well, there goes my Karma ;)

  38. Forget Mice! Forget Trackballs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it may not be the best for gaming, use of an IBM TrackPoint, built into the keyboard, makes for very efficient use of hand and finger motion, resulting in a lot less "brain strain". No more hunting of the hand between an external pointing device and the home keys. It's even more efficient than an integrated trackpad.
    See this for an example.
    The TrackPoint even works with MacOS and MacOS X, using USB Overdrive.

  39. Microsoft Hardware by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    Anyone else notice that Microsoft's best (or perhaps, only decent) products are their hardware offerings? It's amazing what they can offer when they outsource most of the design and manufacturing to someone that knows what they're doing. Microsoft I/O gizmos and the XBox show that Microsoft does know how to assemble a team that is not afriad to hire outsiders to design and build a good product.

    Now if only their Windows versions of Office took some cues from the Mac versions and became less of a disk/ram/cpu hog.

    Off to download the latest 18 MB security service pack for Outlook... man am I glad I only own one Windows PC...

  40. RSI prevention by gidds · · Score: 1
    Two points:
    • I started getting mouse-hand pain a few years ago – probably not the `standard' form, though as it was my palm that hurt, not my wrist. Anyway, I found a simple solution: mouse left-handed! I found it surprisingly easy, and now find it more comfortable than mousing right-handed, as it evens the hands out: instead of having one hand covering half the letter keys, the cursor keys, the numberic keypad and the mouse, the hands are much more evenly balanced. (I also found some, erm, other things are also great left-handed... ;)
    • Buttonless mice such as the one supplied with my Mac G4 seem much easier on the hand than buttoned mice. You've much more freedom to change your grip, and you can click almost anywhere on it. (And before I get flamed, no, Real Programmers don't need at least 3 buttons! Maybe Windoze forces you, but Mac OS works very comfortably with one as well as with more. Honest.)

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    1. Re:RSI prevention by penguin_nipple · · Score: 2
      I agree with your 3 button comment. I was actually expecting someone to flame with why I wasn't using vi in text mode :)

      I am a lefty, but now that I think of it, I never acutally tried using my left hand to control the mouse. So, here I am trying to do it...I feel like I do when I try to write with my right hand. Pretty klunky and having trouble getting used to it. But certainly a thought....

  41. Compare optical mice usb cables by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The MS optical mouse I had died because the USB cable broke. The Logitech mouse I replaced it with has a little plastic extra to limit strain on it. So thumbs up to the Logitech which is still serving me well.

    Also, the decoder chip inside was the same in both mice, so there's no difference there. MS still suck.

  42. usability not so great by markj02 · · Score: 2
    MS mice are flashy and comfortably shaped for many hands. But MS has trouble with basic usability issues: the scroll wheel is not a very good controller for scrolling in actual experiments.

    Now, about those Windows shortcut keys, if you want to use them in Linux, there is nothing stopping you. You can bind them to whatever kind of menu, modifier, or action you want.

  43. I don't know why... by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2

    ...I find this stuff funny. From the site linked:

    Warning: Can't create a new thread (errno 11). If you are not out of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug in /home/sites/site84/web/class_db.php on line 7

    Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Can't create a new thread (errno 11). If you are not out of available memory, you can consult the manual for a possible OS-dependent bug in /home/sites/site84/web/class_db.php on line 7

    ERROR: Unable to connect to database.


    :-) Boom goes the box.

    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  44. Microsoft Mice by entrylevel · · Score: 1

    I've tried every Apple mouse, two Logitech (one regular non-optical and one wireless optical), and a slew of others.

    Nothing had impressed me more than the Optical Intellimouse Explorer until I tried the Wireless Optical Intellimouse Explorer. It tracks even smoother than the wired version, looks great, and doesn't light up the bathe room in a red glow when I turn off the light. The driver software (on Mac) is well designed, unobtrusive, and even tells you when the battery is low.

    Then there is support: when my original Intellimouse died (after 2 years, not under warranty), I read them the serial number off the bottom, gave them my address, and they shipped me a replacement _overnight_, at no cost. When I say overnight, I mean I called at 9 PM and got it before noon the next day. I mail order lots of stuff, and have only seen this kind of performance from Outpost.com.

    I am anti-microsoft-pro-little-guy whenever I can be, but Microsoft has my money when it comes to mice.

    --
    Karma: Incomprehensible (Mostly affected by posting at +5, reading at -1, and metamoderating everything unfair.)
  45. The Mouse by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Since i haven't seen a single post that was on topic, i'd like to actually talk about the mouse.

    Obviously I haven't used one, but I don't see what problem they're trying to solve with this leaning instead of clicking thing... it seems to me that that would be even worse for your wrist after repetitive use, and judging from the other mice on the companies website, they're not exactly masters of ergonomics or industrial design.

    This does bring up a question I've wondered about, though; if Apple offers their own 2-button scroll wheel mouse, what will it look like. The last time we heard rumors that they were designing one was back during the days of their hockey-puck mouse, so the mouse would have had the fruit and ice design scheme. I must say Apple's current no button clickable mouse is beautiful, even though I use my Logitech Cordless Optical Mouse most of the time, I keep it on my desk for the prettiness factor (the Logitech isn't bad though, it almost perfectly matches the colors of a graphite G4 tower, it just can't hold a candle to a translucent black oval floating above your desk ;).

    Of course, there's no guarantee Apple will ever make a two-button mouse, but I don't think you can rule out the possibility that they might start at least including them with Power Macs. Apple has admitted that many of their customers need the extra button and scroll wheel, particularly gamers; when Apple furnished Power Macs for QuakeCon, they came with 3rd party two button mice, and you'll wonder how you ever used the Mac OS X Finder with a one-button mouse once you switch.

    So I think there is plenty of motivation, although they would probably keep the present mouse on the iMacs (the iMacs now actually use a special mouse with a white bubble instead of a black one, ditto for the keyboard). So my question is what would it look like? Hopefully nothing like this one from Green, in form or function, but how do you make a mouse as stunning as the current one with buttons and a scroll wheel breaking up the design? Would be a very different design, but the new towers might see a very new design sometime soon as well, and they might take that opportunity to switch keyboard and mouse designs ont the pro products as well, after all, is Apple going to use the same style they've had since the G3 when they start making 5th gen towers.

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  46. Here's the article... by thebabelfish · · Score: 1

    Here's the article for those who can't reach it. Sorry for the freakin' filler, I hate the lameness filter.

    Introduction (stupid filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    Personally I never heard of the company "Green" before. Did you? Anyway, they seem to have a wide range of rather interesting products. Today we take a look at two of them; The Crystal Optical Mouse and the Finger Mouse.

    (image of packaging) (filler, filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    These products are provided by Colorcase.be.

    Crystal Optical Mouse (stupid filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    Let's take a closer look at the Crystal Optical Mouse.

    As we all know, most mice come with 2 or 3 buttons and a scroll wheel. Well, times change :). Green decided to try something new and they developed a buttonless mouse.

    How does it work? The top part of the mouse is one shell. You have to move the shell to the right or the left to click. Here's a picture to clear it up:

    (image of mouse, (c) Green)

    Specs Crystal Optical (stupid filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    Colorcase.be has this mouse in two different colors; black and purple. I have to warn you though, the black one isn't really black. It's rather "smoked", which is even sweeter :).

    (image of both mice next to each other) (filler, filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    Specs (filler, filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    • 400 - 1500 dpi optical sensors (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    • Scroll wheel (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    • Flashy design (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    • USB connector (ps2 converter-piece included!)
    • A lighting LED (filler, filler, filler, filler)

    Experience Crystal Optical (stupid filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    When I first started to use this mouse it felt really weird. Especially because you have to swing the mouse to the left and the right to click. After using it for a couple of hours it was a piece of cake. It's a great mouse, but defenitly not suited for a real gamer. It takes to much time to click and you can't right click and left click at the same time. So if you work in an office all day and you want to try something new, try this mouse. If you are a hardcore gamer; leave it alone.

    (image showing the smoked/transparant effect) (filler, filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)
    (image of above but in the dark) (filler, filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    What about the ergonomics? Well, to be honest, in the beginning this mouse is a little hard on you wrist. But when you get used to it that problem will not occure again!

    Finger Mouse (stupid filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    This mouse (if you can call it a mouse) was especially developed for powerpoint presentation. With a normal mouse or trackball it's rather hard, when making a presentation, to switch between screens. Thanks to this innovative mouse you can say goodbye to that problem.

    (image of the finger mouse) (filler, filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    Specs Finger Mouse (stupid filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    Let's see what this little mouse has to offer.

    Specs: (filler, filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    • For notebook users (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    • For children's tutorial operations (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    • Special Elegant design (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    • Wrist and finger muscle harmless design (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    • A lighting LED when power by computer (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    • Cursor movement is activated by thumb (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    • USB/PS2 (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    • Measurements: L x H x H= 98 x 45 x 75mm (filler, filler, filler, filler)
    (image of mouse) (filler, filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    As you can see by the specification list, the main purpose of the Finger Mouse is to make presentations and laptop use easier. But if you have a laptop I wouldn't recommend this mouse. This mouse is a really awesome sollution for people who have to make a lot of presentations!

    Here's how to hold it:

    (image of mouse being held) (filler, filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    Conclusion (stupid filler, filler, filler, filler, filler)

    Crystal Optical Mouse:

    This mouse performs very well and looks really sweet. It costs 48, that's about 52USD, but it's sure worth the money. I would recommend it to anyone who has to work with a PC whole day, because it is fun to use. But to all gamers, stay away from this mouse :).

    Finger Mouse:

    This mouse is perfect for Powerpoint presentations. But that's its only purpose, don't try to use it for something else. This mouse is available for 40EUR, about 43USD.

    You can download additional drivers for the Crystal Optical Mouse here.

    --
    "I don't trust goats," --To Catch a Spy
  47. wireless optical 3 button with no scroll wheel? by pomakis · · Score: 1
    If I could find a wireless optical three button mouse without that silly scroll wheel, I'd buy it in an instant. Unfortunately, since scroll wheels for some reason are becoming seen as "necessary" on a mouse nowadays, I suspect I'll never see such a combination.

    Heck, even if it wasn't optical I'd be happy.

    1. Re:wireless optical 3 button with no scroll wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so just buy a wireless optical 3 button mouse with a scroll wheel, open it up and remove the wheel.

      Stop complaining.

    2. Re:wireless optical 3 button with no scroll wheel? by pomakis · · Score: 1
      so just buy a wireless optical 3 button mouse with a scroll wheel, open it up and remove the wheel.

      Can't do that... the scroll wheel doubles as the middle button.

  48. Microsoft optical mouse death by dzym · · Score: 1

    Many readers have wrote comments to the effect of their Microsoft optical mouse dying and them getting a free replacement from MS with just a phone call.

    These are not isolated incidents.

    Early versions of MS's optical mice have an exceptionally weak spot in what is otherwise a finely engineered product, which is where the cord enters the mouse itself. The wiring there can easily break, and indeed does also frequently occur on non-Microsoft mice.

    MS is aware of this problem. It is not acknowledged to be a systematic problem, and they handle the replacement policy very well, as some here have noted. But it is still a problem with the earlier versions of MS optical mice.

    Current versions of these excellent mice seem to have that connection point reinforced.

    1. Re:Microsoft optical mouse death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on my third mouse because of the lack of any sort of protective ring/sheath where the mouse cord enters the mouse housing... that means all the stress involved in flexing goes straight to the wires which will eventually break under the repeatative stress.

      Right now I'm getting about 6-9 months use out of the mouse before this happens. So far Microsoft hasn't batted an eyelash when I contacted them to get a replacement.

  49. logitech optical cordless rule! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've a got a logitech cordless optical like Taco, and love it. great for simple surfing or other desktop stuff. Sucks in Unreal Tournament though, but I have to reboot to play it anyway, so its a rare occasion.

  50. Microsoft isn't a hardware company by realkiwi · · Score: 1

    You never read the quote by himself saying that MS isn't and never would be a hardware company???

    I read it and as they aren't I don't buy stuff that doesn't exist... Remember He never lies!

    Logitech make very nice mice and on my Vaio I have a very small Dexxa wheel mouse. But my next mouse will be a Wacom Graphire.

    --
    realkiwi
  51. Re:Help, I'm stuck in jail! by October_30th · · Score: 1

    Does he have a CRACK WHORE fetish? Is that why he moved to Harlem?

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  52. Logitech Mouseman Wheel optical by asv108 · · Score: 2

    I purchased a mouseman wheel optical when they first came out a couple of years ago. I've been very pleased with this mouse. It has 4 buttons + wheel, which is surely enough for anyone. The design is very comfortable, plus if you look at Intellimouse Explorer it appears to be very similar in design to the mouseman. Another cool feature of the mouseman, is the blue LED that is USB powered. It looks really cool in the dark too. I've looked at the newer wireless mice, but I have no reason to go wireless plus it isn't the same form factor as the mouseman wheel.

  53. Re:Help, I'm stuck in jail! by October_30th · · Score: 1
    Hey, dont diss Monica! She looks like she could deliver hell of a blow-job.

    Besides, I like women with a healthy amount of meat on their bones -- not these anorectic excuses for a woman you tend to meet today. Hell, I'm only 32 and yet today's freshman university girls I see on my lectures every day quite frankly horrify me. Every day there's like a row of skeletons with makeup greeting me on the front-row.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  54. Don't know what your talking about by dnoyeb · · Score: 0

    I went optical, and it works just fine. Im tired of cleaning my balls. And the mouse flick works just as it always did. The flick was not really about the mouse, but more about the mouse pad area. You can still life an optical mouse and gain more space. At least I do and havent noticed an issue with it.

    Certainly optical mice track better than balls. A ball has a certain amount of inherent loss in its movement.

    In any event, I wont admit to actually consulting the "pros" but in my own personal experience, I like this mouse and i have yet to blame it for any of my deaths.

    1. Re:Don't know what your talking about by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      The rate at which a mouse ball will get dirty is related to the environment, and the MOUSE PAD. I have an anchient Genius Mouse/Cutting Pad and it greatly reduces (or should I say "eliminates"? I never have to clean it out...) the amount of dirt that gets in to muck up the mouse. The sponge/cloth things are crap.

    2. Re:Don't know what your talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im tired of cleaning my balls

      Was that an intentional non-sequitur?

  55. Buttonless ergonomics - one person's experience by victim · · Score: 2

    I have to give a big thumbs up to buttonless mice. I've been fighting an RSI in my mouse hand for a couple of years. Since I've switched to a buttonless mouse it has cleared up entirely. I highly recommend anyone with mouse hand problems try one.

    It is an apple mouse. You don't miss the buttons under Mac OS, I run about half the time in X and I've just learned to use the extra modifier keys to get the other buttons. It becomes automatic after a day.

    (Not that I'm a clicking fiend, the injury probably originated while playing a string of shows with a bluegrass band. 240 notes/minute, 80/finger/minute on the right hand for three hours a day is a lot of finger pulling for a bass player. I had to stop doing that, but the hand didn't heal until I switched mice.)

  56. How to do Middle button? by ssheth · · Score: 1

    Most 2-button mice have it setup so you hit both left and right buttons together to get the middle button. How could you do that on this mouse since you can only "swing" one direction at a time?

  57. Carpal Tunnel Mouse Advice by hendridm · · Score: 1

    I started with severe shooting pains in my right hand due to too many hours of work, programming for school, and mostly because of playing Diablo II.

    I started using my right hand for mousing and developed the shooting pains within a couple of months (which is odd, since it took almost 8 years of computing to develop the pain in my right hand).

    I tried several mice, but the trackball worked best. Not all trackballs are created equal, however. Some of them require you to push the buttons with the standard pointer and middle finger. These did nothing for the pain.

    Finally, I found an excellent trackball that is both ambidextrous AND allows the left and right mouse button to be pushed with the pinky and thumb instead of the standard fingers. It's also Optical so I don't need to clean the damn thing every week. It's the Logitech Marble mouse , and it rocks.

    I found the most difficult part to get used to is not having the scrool button. It took longer to get used to that than switching from my right to left hand. Now I can use a trackball or standard mouse in either hand with equal ease.

    Unfortunately, it is not feasible to bring a trackball to work because I am always sitting at a different terminal, so I had to adopt a method where I use my right hand to guide the mouse and push the buttons with my right hand (while using the muscles in my wrist and not my fingers) to do the mouse. It's only a little counterproductive, and it's better than not being able to work...

    1. Re:Carpal Tunnel Mouse Advice by Garath · · Score: 1

      What I've found that works well for ergonomics is the Naturalpoint TrackIR (http://www.naturalpoint.com) It tracks a reflective dot on your forehead. With that and an external switch I made out of a joystick handle, my arm feels much better. Unforunately, there are no linux drivers - there was a project to write them, but it seems to have stalled. The company is willing to provide any documentation needed, but they're too busy with the windows and mac drivers. That's actually one of the things that's keeping windows as my primary OS at the moment. I'd try writing the drivers, but I don't have nearly the needed skills - I'm just a genetics geek who dabbles in programming occasionally when I have to. :) Fnord, Garath

    2. Re:Carpal Tunnel Mouse Advice by Nameles · · Score: 1

      I agree on the Logitech Marble Trackball. I hate trackballs, but that was the only one I could stand using for a while.

      I wonder what solutions are like for laptops? I think almost all companies now use the touchpad (which I abhor). I stick with an older laptop that still had one of those "nipple" "trackballs" or whatever you want to call them.

  58. One Button Why? by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    I can understand why Apple ships machines with a one button mouse. MacOS has a global menu bar and, was design for one button mice...more or less. Things such as important desktop tasks are located in the finder's menu bar.

    However a one button mouse with a windows or linux system would seriously annoy the hell out of me.

    This is a nich market mouse that is probably only going to be bought by mac users or people building public terminals.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:One Button Why? by Stenpas · · Score: 1
      One of the things I've noticed of how OSes differ from the MacOS is their lack of keyboard shortcuts. In the menu bar under MacOS 9, there's 22 keyboard shortcuts and they're pretty obvious to use. command-o opens a file/folder, command-p prints, that type of thing. And every program takes advantage of them in some way. In Netscape, there's 38 keyboard shortcuts.

      In the end, this is a huge efficiency gain because you don't have to spend the extra 3-5 seconds to go to the mouse, find what you want, and select what you want.

      Multiply that 3-5 seconds by how many times you go from the keyboard to mouse in one day to access a menu. That's how much time you could be saving if their was a keyboard shortcut to it. It ends up becoming a huge number.

      Last I looked, Windows didn't have too many keyboard shortcuts, or at the very least there was no obvious way of knowing what they were. Very unfortunate.

    2. Re:One Button Why? by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

      Read the link please. The style is similar to the Apple Pro mouse except instead of a single click action you lean the mouse to the left for a left click and lean to the right for a right click. The only thing thise mouse lacks in comparison to a regular optical mouse is a scroll wheel which would drive me batty like my Apple Pro mouse does on my Powerbook. I know a scroll wheel doesn't look as asthetic but PLEASE reading a long web page without a scrool wheel (or PDF document) is madness.

      --
      I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  59. Stupidamouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never thought that parody would become reality... check out this 1998 parody Stupidamouse.

  60. Re:Help, I'm stuck in jail! by October_30th · · Score: 1
    Too much is, obviously, too much. :)

    Im talking about normal women, not some beach babes who cant eat or drink for the fear of getting "fat" but keep taking speed instead.

    I'm talking about the likes of Kate Winslet.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  61. Logitech wireless optical by darkwhite · · Score: 2

    (I don't work for logitech.)

    I've been using it for almost a year now (bought it when it came out). It is wonderful. I've been playing all kinds of games with it, tried my friend's Razor Boomslang, this is definitely better. I like the shape, although I suspect some of the bigger mice (like MS Optical) may be more comfortable for the hand. Batteries work for two or three months (I use rechargeable so it's more like a month and then I spend 5 seconds replacing them with charged ones). Doesn't need a pad, doesn't collect residue like ball mice. Windows detects it as a standard HID device, so no drivers needed. Not bad at all, I say it's definitely worth the money.

    --

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]
  62. Trackballs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't used a mouse for years, my logitech trackball works so much better.With a thick pad in front of it, it is much more comfortable, and the control is much tighter. For my laptop, I have a little trackball that you wear like a big ring, beats the crap out of wearing a hole in the finger with the little red thing in the keyboard. Of course for Photoshop nothing comes close to the wacom artz 12x12 tablet.

    So who needs a mouse of any ilk.

  63. Day Late, 2 Buttons Short. by dgulbran · · Score: 1
    This is nothing new. I've been using one for over 6 months, both Mac & PC, and it works great.


    I bought one of these in Japan in July 2001. And CNET Asia ran this review of the product in October 2001. Sheesh. So much for cutting edge news on /.

    --
    The world won't end in darkness, it'll end in family fun, with Coca-cola clouds behind a Big Mac sun.
  64. Laptop Options by hendridm · · Score: 1

    I used to say exactly what you are saying. I would always check out an older laptop at school just to get the nipple because I simple hating the touch pads. However, have you tried the newer laptop touch pads? The technology has improved greatly in the last year or so.

    I've recently used the touchpad on the newer Apple iBook/Titaniums and some new Toshiba laptops we have, and it is excellent. I've switched to it and now can't stand going back to the nipple when I am forced to, but when I use some of the older touchpad laptops, I get irritated at how sloppy they are.

  65. I know that was a joke but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an optical mouse leaning the mouse doesn't stop movement unless you lift it off the desk more than sensitivity of the optics allows. this can vary widely, some optical mice will still have motion a full centimeter off the desk.
    This is why the 'underwater computer' uses an optical mouse. Basically technology has made that joke obsolete.

  66. The trackpad is the best mouse ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even with a desktop I use an external trackpad. The trackpad is the best mouse ever! NO need for room to operate it!

  67. THE ABOVE POST IS TROLLING! LINK IS NOT PORN! by Anders+H�ckersten · · Score: 1

    The parent to this post is trolling. The link is perfectly fine.

  68. Awful website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1x1 .gif file tiled to set the background color? GAH!!!!

  69. Can we say..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ups to #dlf

  70. Suggestive Marketing by Steve+X · · Score: 1

    My housemate pointed this out to me and I tend to agree:

    Doesn't this memepool link seem to "suggest" this buttonless mouse?

    Just a theory, of course...

  71. Change the scroll wheel by billcopc · · Score: 1

    New mouse designs are nice, but why not just fix the existing mice's problems ?

    Personally, I'd like to have an analog scroll wheel. Of course that would require enhanced software support. Something precise enough to move pixel-by-pixel. Perhaps with a physical switch to re-enable the click marks, which would be necessary in games which use the wheel to switch weapons or inventory items, etc.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  72. Can't emulate middle button! by vindaci · · Score: 1

    It looks like it doesn't come with a middle button (I don't see anywhere about a pushable wheel). You can't even emulate three buttons because you can press *either* the left or the right button, but not both! :(

  73. Been done before... by Bazman · · Score: 2

    Here's a really useful buttonless mouse, the Stupidamouse.

  74. am I the only one here... by the_consumer · · Score: 1

    ...who uses an ibm scrollpoint? After using a mouse with a joystick, you'll never want to use a scroll wheel again. Force sensitive vertical and horizontal scrolling just rules. I wish more companies would use this technology, maybe ibm has a patent, I dunno...

    --
    "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -