Slashdot Mirror


How To Profit From Telemarketing

jsprat writes: "From the Seattle PI: A man gets an automated message from a telemarketer. He complains. Two weeks later, he gets a check and an apology! In the article, another man is mentioned who claims to have collected $2650 dollars over the last year for illegal spam, faxes and automated calls. Another weapon to fight these clowns?" What's your personal cash-won record?

325 comments

  1. Ironically.... by qurob · · Score: 3, Funny

    Telemarketers call YOU so THEY can make money....

  2. 045Ax 65384... CORE DUMP..... by The_Fire_Horse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi there - this is a note to the reader of slashdot. If you are reading this message, then the software has cored and the experiment is over.

    In case you aren't aware there aren't really any people posting on slashdot - this is all one gigantic IRC bot specifically designed to make you believe that you are part of a community. You (yes - *you* ) are talking to a very clever computer program.

    Well, sorry if we confused you, and hey thanks anyway. (Oh, yes and because you are the only reader our logs show that you have several 'karma accounts' and a number of 'troll' accounts - you never fooled anyone.

    Even your emails to Taco were ironic - you didnt know, but Taco is actually a QuickBasic program on an old XT!

    Thanks for reading and posting.
    Over, and out.

    Woah! Hey relax - its a joke (I've seen the Matrix too many times)

    1. Re:045Ax 65384... CORE DUMP..... by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

      In other words, your life is The Truman Show.

  3. Money for nothing? by stevenbee · · Score: 1

    Who has the time to pursue this kind of thing? That time and energy could be spent making money honestly.
    And Timothy, I ain't kissing no man.

    ; - )

    --
    Don't read this!
    1. Re:Money for nothing? by Sc00ter · · Score: 2

      What's so hard about writing down what time they called and if they call when they're not suppose to to send a letter?

    2. Re:Money for nothing? by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

      But, doing that cuts into my pr0n surfing time!

    3. Re:Money for nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Who has the time to pursue this kind of thing?

      The guy sent an email, and copy-pasted the text of the relevant law. Probably look less time than for you to ridcule him on /. The difference is, now he has $500 and you just have another blog post

    4. Re:Money for nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      now he has $500 and you just have another blog post

      Dude, $500 ain't jack; that's what your mom gets from me every day for her "services" -- and it just barely covers her daily crack habit. I mean come on, get a grip!

    5. Re:Money for nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $500 for an email isn't a bad afternoons work.

      Besides, if it wasn't for these types of people, you wouldn't be able to have a phone in your home for the incesant ringing.

      I really do believe these types of laws have helped a lot. A simple "Put me on your do not call list" has been quite effective for me and my wife.

      If it didn't have the veracity of law, it wouldn't really help.

    6. Re:Money for nothing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suing a spammer is making money honestly. BTW, DHS is a notorious spammer, although I wasn't aware of their violating the TCPA as well.

  4. Ben Livingston's success by Jerky+McNaughty · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ben Livingston has a web page with a lot of good hints for anyone interested in suing these people. He also has a complete list of everyone he's sued, the outcomes, and in some cases, even a scanned image of the check they sent him.

    1. Re:Ben Livingston's success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Ben Livingston's success by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It shouldn't be that difficult to automate the filing process. At least, arrange forms for specific types of actions and have these templates preserved for future actions against parties that call/fax/email in violation.

      I read his how-to-warrior-fu document thinking it's all good, makes sense. Just the nagging problem is making sure you're on the right side of things.

      Eg., WA state has some system where you register your email address (http://registry.waisp.org/) so that parties violating the strict anti-spam law can not claim ignorance to knowing that you don't want spam, or at the least you are a WA resident and it would be foolish to send spam once learning ("knowing", that cracked me up... in the Biblical sense? Nah..) the fact you're WA resident.

      I think that if you're able, to mirror and re-invigorate the the how-to-anti-spam-warrior-fu document to get the wave going. Hands off Washington.

      Another topic is that by allowing telemarketers to defeat caller ID, doesn't that contradict the intent of the law to make it illegal to conduct automated telemarketting? It seems logical that defeating caller ID is what tele-marketters hide behind, making it difficult to trace/track/prove calling events.

      Whatever. Go Ben.

  5. My personal cash-won record? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    No way am I pissing off these guys...I'm gonna make MILLIONS by selling those penis-enlargement pills! And it's not even MLM!

    I hate to brag, Timothy, but I think you're being just a little short-sighted about this.

    1. Re:My personal cash-won record? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SECRETS OF PENIS!!!!
      $5!!!!!!!!!!!

      The spammers never reply to my questions.
      Do you you have a 50c version.

      Thanx

  6. I�m gonna be rich by fabiolrs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If a get 1 buck from ever spammer that sends me unwanted messages Im gonna get rich soon! :))

    Is there a law in US that obligates spammers to give people money or that makes spam a crime? Here in Brazil we have no such law neither any law that makes spam a crime. I believe obligating these stupid people to pay some money to people they send spam would descrease A LOT the amount of unwanted messages we get everday...

    --
    Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
    http://www.morroida.com.br
    1. Re:I�m gonna be rich by qurob · · Score: 1

      True...if I got $1 from each piece of spam I recieved, I'd be making about 300*365 = $1,096,500 a year.

    2. Re:I�m gonna be rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liar!!! screw you! we both know that I'm the only one who sends you email, and i'm only send you a 1/10th of what you say. that's it we are finnished. I want to break up!

      Your Mom.

    3. Re:I�m gonna be rich by DaBunny · · Score: 1

      I think you missed a decimal place there. 300*365 = $109,650. Not bad, but still in the same ballpark as honest work...

    4. Re:I�m gonna be rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing worse than being finnished is being swedished.

    5. Re:I�m gonna be rich by morcego · · Score: 2

      Actually, I too live in Brazil. And receives a lot of spam.
      From my personal experience, most Brazilians ISP do act agains spammers. I for myself have managed to have dozens of spammers have thier accounts closed, and even a few that got charged by their ISPs. The most sensible exception is UOL (one of the largest ISPs, but which fortunately generated very little spam). SPAMs from Brazil accounts for about 15% of all the SPAM I get.
      In any case, if I had the time, I think I could sue the spammers here, for taking advantage of a service which I pay for (my internet connection), and I think I could win.
      So, don't think everything is helpless here. Just get a good lawyer, and talk to him about the things you can do.

      --
      morcego
    6. Re:I�m gonna be rich by MattCohn.com · · Score: 0
      If you want to get a list of people who send you unsoliceted e-mail, it's actualy quite easy. You can just create a new account at Hotmail!

      • Create the account,
      • Give the address to no-one,
      • Check it in a week, and you have about 300 people who sent you unsoliceted e-mail.

      Actualy, I'm going to go try it now...
  7. Never underestimate . . . by div_2n · · Score: 2, Funny

    the power of noisemakers. When you know it is a telemarketer, just set the phone next to any of the following for an extended period of time. Say . . . 5 minutes. -A blender -A garbage disposal -A TV/Radio speaker -You ass after eating beans -etc. Remember, they pay for those calls. Make them earn em!

    1. Re:Never underestimate . . . by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 1

      You're fighting an entity who simply doesn't care. It's like trying to annoy your PC by thumbing your nose at its error messages.

      A telemarketer is a computer script with a human interface. All the telemarketer does is read a computer screen telling him exactly what to say and press buttons indicating your responses. There's absolutely no thought involved on his part, and so he doesn't care whether you try to annoy him.

      The best way to deal with a telemarketer is, as soon as you're sure it's a telemarketer:

      (1) Ask, 'Does your company have a don't-call list?'

      (2) Ask, 'Would you please put my name and phone number on that list?'

      I have never had a telemarketer say 'no' to either of those questions, and I hardly ever get a telemarketing call any more.

      For more information, see JunkBusters at 'http://www.junkbusters.com/'.

    2. Re:Never underestimate . . . by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      actually don't do that, you can mess up thier ears. More than once I had to throw down my headset because someone put on a really loud noise. Once I had to go home because the ringing didn't stop.

      Remember they are just doing thier jobs, it's the marketers fault that the jobs exist in the first place. You have to understand, they probably don't want to call you just as much as you don't want to be called.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    3. Re:Never underestimate . . . by DrSkwid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I gas jews all day, man those bitches sure are whiney

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    4. Re:Never underestimate . . . by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Stop eating so many beans.

    5. Re:Never underestimate . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, if you REALLY want to punish them, just hang up.

      Take a listen to this from "This American Life" here:

      http://www.thislife.org/

      Click on the 02 archive and scroll down to the February 1 episode, "Plan B," and listen to "Act Four: A Fate Most of Us Fear" (requires RealAudio). It's one particular guy's telemarketing experience.

      The MOST beneficial thing you can do for the poor schlubs in a telephone boiler room is to do ANYTHING out of the ordinary which keeps them on the phone longer than the 30 seconds or so that they are allowed to give their initial pitch. If you keep them on line then that gives the phoners a break from having to give their pitch again (and again and...). This also explains why they are more than willing to go along with almost any nonsense (short of ear damage and pure obnoxiousness) for minutes at a time.

      ...and, no, I did not listen to it again to see if you can skip to Act Four: once was quite enough for me, thank you!

    6. Re:Never underestimate . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, mod this reply upward!

      It's taking the example to the extreme, but you have to admit that the analogy is clear.

    7. Re:Never underestimate . . . by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      That is simply not true, and a very shallow, foolish way to look at the 'human interface' that is talking to you on the phone.

      Sure, the job might seem unpleasant and immoral to you. However, they are indeed people, and have lives just like you do, outside of work. It's a huge emotional strain on some people to do it - the constant rejection, people yelling at you, swearing at you, being very poor human specimens.

      I know this from personal experience. I was in dire financial straights this past summer, and there were absolutely no other jobs available (small retirement town). I lasted for less than 2 weeks. It was depressing, and I lost a lot of faith in the human race. People are selfish bastards; when I say 'people', I mean you. Just say, "I'm not interested, but I appreciate your call. Goodbye." It's not that difficult. Stop being so carnal by finding glee in harassing telemarketers (unless, of course, they're rude... then give 'em bloody hell!)

      Personally, there were many times that I'd hang up from a downright hostile call, and think to myself, "I have their address (newspaper marketing) and number in front of me, and I know where to find a gun," due to the anguish of being constantly insulted, rejected, and verbally injured (being an emotional person and depressed at the time, didn't help, I'm sure...)

      And saying that telemarketers are worse than drug dealers is completely off the wall, too. Drug dealers sell, well, drugs. They harm people, destroy lives, and break up relationships. They steal entire lives, never mind the few seconds it takes to give a polite "no thank you, goodbye". I doubt you, or most other people, get irrate about commercial breaks on TV.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    8. Re:Never underestimate . . . by Death_Aparatus · · Score: 1

      I've acctually been refused when I asked, "Can you please take my name off the list."

  8. I get about 9 to 10 spam emails a day by 412-613-8636 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I tried unsubscribing and sending complaints via email. Next day I received some more email from them, so I actually openned and read some of them and they all offered me GREAT deals on cool merchandise.

  9. Gotta try this: by colonelteddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hello friends, how would you like to make some easy money?

    human: Sure!

    It's simple, all you have to do is listen to this message, follow a simple procedure and BOOM! its money in your pocket

    human: ... (hmm... accentuated silence!)

    Simply send 10 dollars to the following address, or leave us your credit card details, and we'll send you all the information you need to complain about us! Yes, it is that simple!

    --
    c - a blessed +5 grain of salt
  10. Oh great - more MAKE MONEY NOW spams! by velcrokitty · · Score: 1

    I can imagine the body of text describing how all you have to do is sit around the house, answering the phone when it rings, record who called you, etc...

    --
    I stick to walls...
    1. Re:Oh great - more MAKE MONEY NOW spams! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i should make a telemarketing scam. all you have to do is NOT sit around the house, and go out there in the real world, try to find a job anywhere you can, be persistant about it, and eventually they might hire you! you can earn thousands of dollars a month with this scheme! wow! get rich quick!

  11. Would you like to be as happy as me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Send one dollar to:
    "HAPPY DUDE"
    742 Evergreen Terrace
    Springfield, USA
    You have the power!
    1. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by AsnFkr · · Score: 1

      what state? eric.

    2. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a more accurate map of his location:

      http://www.thesimpsons.com/index.html

    3. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by xTK-421x · · Score: 1

      Hey, that Simpsons episode was just on TV last night!

      [4F01] - Lisa's Date With Density.

      "Greetings, friends. Do you wish to look as happy as me? Well, you've got the power inside you right now. So, use it, and send one dollar to Happy Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. Don't delay, eternal happiness is just a dollar away." -- Homer

      --
      "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
    4. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by demaria · · Score: 2

      They never say the full name, but the state's postal abbreviation is "NT". It's been shown on Homer's drivers license at least once.

    5. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by Asahi+Super+Dry · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of my 10th grade history teacher who once told us about a classified ad he put in the paper: "Last chance: Send dollar now!" and his address -- that's all. Not sure if it worked or not...

    6. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Eternal happiness for one dollar ... I'd rather have the dollar" - C.M. Burns

    7. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, this is Homer Simpson, a.k.a. Happy Dude. The court has ordered
      me to call every person in town to apologize for my telemarketing scam.
      I'm sorry. If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, send one
      dollar to Sorry Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. You have the
      power.

    8. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by servanya · · Score: 1

      I live in Portland, OR. Everyone here knows that they are talking about Oregon! Matt Groening was from portland, and most of the characters are named after portland streets. Actually, Groening lived on evergreen terrace in real life.
      :)

    9. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by curunir · · Score: 2

      Hmmm...I think I'd rather have the dollar.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    10. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by b00111111 · · Score: 1

      That stands for "Not Telling"

    11. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      I thought the lived in "Ohi-ya Maude!"

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    12. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I was going to say that! Damn you! Damn you to hell!

      :-)

      [snarfle]

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    13. Re:Would you like to be as happy as me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Technology, duh.

  12. The guy in question's website is very informative by marekk · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This guy's (Ben Livingston) website. He discusses all of his cases, including settlement, backstory, etc. Very informative.

  13. stat 101. by QualityWithAKei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Schroeter, who already works at home and consequently hates telemarketing calls more than the average person...

    right...
    he hates telemarketers more on average then i do, just like i'm smarter then the average person and drive better then the average driver.

    --
    --------------------------------------------
    Customers are taking to many free napkins...
    1. Re:stat 101. by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

      ...and remember, statistically, half the people you meet are dumber than you...

    2. Re:stat 101. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you are in the 50th percentile of intelligence.

    3. Re:stat 101. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      >> just like i'm smarter then the average person and drive better then the average driver.

      Too bad you're not better THAN the average fourth grade speller

    4. Re:stat 101. by morcego · · Score: 1

      Statistically, 80% of all statistics are forged :-)

      --
      morcego
    5. Re:stat 101. by Sadfsdaf · · Score: 1

      Statistically, if you were a complete, utter moron, 99% of the people you meet will be smarter than you.

  14. So far, about $3250 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    And counting. Not bad for a poor grad student. I make sure I post to Usenet quite a lot and surf random porn sites. This seems to be the way they get hold of your address. Once they have it on one list it will soon migrate.


    The key here is persistance. Its amazing how almost anyone will crumble when faced with a legal threat. Think about the way Scientologists went after slashdot, thats how I go after spammers. I may even be on thin legal ice so to speak, but the mere threat of the law usually sees these guys settle. At the moment, its cheaper for them to do this.


    Its also worth noting that I am Canadian which makes it a whole lot more complicated (and therefore expensive) from a legal perspective.


    I would urge slashdotters to take up my hobby, it takes about 1hr/week and can be very lucrative.

    1. Re:So far, about $3250 by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Uh huh. Yeah, I'm just going to porn sites to get on spammers mailing lists so I can sue them.

      At least you've created an original excuse ;)

    2. Re:So far, about $3250 by alexo · · Score: 1

      Care to share your experiences with a fellow Canadian?

    3. Re:So far, about $3250 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's just sick.

    4. Re:So far, about $3250 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      OK,

      Step 1: I go to various free mail sites, such as hushmail, yahoo, hotmail etc and create 'interesting looking' accounts. I always remember to 'opt out' of any e-mail offers these sites give.

      Step 2: I post to various newsgroups. I want to try and get the new mail accounts onto as many spam lists as possible. I make sure my e-mail address is prominent, and I choose newsgroups that are likely to get me on 'quality' spam lists.
      (I want to make sure there will be a corporation with deep pockets at the other end).

      Step 3: Go to any porn site and surf around. Ensure you have minimal security enabled in your browser. I have a separate install of WinME running in VMware which I use for all my insecure surfing.

      Step 4: Sit back and wait for the unsolicited spam to come rolling in.

      Step 5: Break out the boilerplate legal document (created by a law student friend of mine) and start making 'threats'


      Usually you will find the checks come rolling in pretty quickly. You may need to talk to some legal guy on the phone, but in the vast majority of cases, you don't.


      Finally, slashdot is a pretty good place to go to get your address onto a spam list. Just remember not to obscure your email address in your preferances settings.


      Enjoy, and good luck making $$$$s out of Spammers.

    5. Re:So far, about $3250 by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      Not only that; he uses Lynx.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  15. Well, I work for RIAA by prisoner · · Score: 5, Funny

    and we just got (pinky in mouth) One Million...oh wait, this is enemy territory....never mind...

  16. WHO THE HELL HAS TIME FOR THAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's your personal records?? Gimme a break will you!! Do you actually have TIME to collect that cash from spammers? $2000 a year, what a joke... Your valuable time doesn't seem to be very valuable at all.

  17. I actually like telemarketers.... by Ermyf+Jym · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think they're a lot of fun, actually. Most people get mad at them but I look at it as a prank phone call you can't get in trouble for. As an example, a telemarketer once called during a favorite tv program of mine. I began to yell at them for interrupting my favorite show but then I calmly explained why it was so important that I watched the show. I gave him the plotline, character descriptions, etc. Had him on the line for about 10 minutes while completely wasting his time!

    1. Re:I actually like telemarketers.... by screenbert · · Score: 1

      I totally agree. I love telemarketers. Anytime a long distance company calls I have this long routine... I asked them if they'll give me .05 a minute 365 days a years 7 days a week. I then get them to commit to a time period... I explain how when you do the math it is $XX,000 dollars. I then ask when I'll receive my check and if it will be an annual payment. They tell me they aren't going to give me a check for $38,000 dollars. I tell them that's fine, I accept money orders cash and travelers checks. My record is 22 minutes.

      My wife gets annoyed... meanwhile the New York Times calls and tries to sell me a weekend subscription at a $83 savings. They say it'll be delivered to my door. I tell them that more than a $83.. in the first month alone I could save $800.00, becuase each plane ticket to new york is $200.00...

      Just listen to what they are selling and find something to make fun of. Provides for hours fun to tell your friends about.

    2. Re:I actually like telemarketers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or even better, try to sell the guy on the phone something. If you're a consultant, offer to consult for his company at $100/hr. If you aren't, offer to sell him old computer parts, or the garbage can from the kitchen. Anything to try to let them know when people sell you something you don't want.

    3. Re:I actually like telemarketers.... by morcego · · Score: 1

      There is a singular (AFAIK) fact about most telemarketers here in Brazil, which makes most telemarketing calls very interesting for me. You see, most of the times, when you say you are not interested, they ask if you would like to give that wonderfull oportunity to a friend (giving your friend phone number to the telemarketer).
      Well, guess what ? I always have a list of "friends" to give them. :-)

      --
      morcego
    4. Re:I actually like telemarketers.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wife got pissed at me the other nite. After having a beer or twelve, I answered an "unknown caller".

      Good evening (the male voice said).I have a very exciting offer for you.

      Me(good and drunk by now) Oh. Your sending your sister over to blow me! I certainly hope she's better than your mom was!

      Wife grabs phone and hangs it up. Not allowed to answer unknown callers anymore.

  18. $500 by Blue23 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, $500 is not a lot. Especially compared to the actual cost of a lawsuit. The number of people who know their rights, and properly preserve the evidice is low. It might just be part of business-as-usual for YourHomeCareer.com to pay those who know the law.

    They get PR (and all PR is good PR), come across as "ok, we did something wrong but we're good upstanding people who are willing to be good members of the community and make amends." They come out smelling like roses for a fairly paltry sum. It's a wonderful thought.

    =Blue(23)

    --
    LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
    1. Re:$500 by Casca · · Score: 1

      Except that now they will be seen as weak, and so are far more likely to get sued by people that they bug. Shouldn't be too long before they are culled from the herd....

      --
      Casca
    2. Re:$500 by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      Filed in small claims court, the cost here in Seattle is $21. Plus of course, the few hours it costs you to stand in line to get forms, and court time. That still leaves enough for my next motherboard upgrade :)

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  19. Telemarketers have evolved... by Gruneun · · Score: 5, Interesting

    (I was on the fence about putting this out as someone may start doing it, but...)

    I received a phone call a few months ago. The call rang once and ended before I could pick it up. When I checked the Caller ID (never go home without it) it had a number outside of my area code with a label, "Prize Claim Dept" attached.

    When I checked the area code it was somewhere in the Carribean. I have seen more than a few jobs listed in the classifieds that had similar numbers, charging $20 a minute (legally) without warning.

    This was pretty crafty, though. First, they get you to initiate the call, making it much easier for them to get your money. Second, if there ever was a problem, they could easily argue that they dialed the wrong number, realized it, then hung up. They didn't expect you to call them.

    Ethically lacking, but pretty crafty.

    1. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't really call that telemarketing, but it does remind me of a scam that was going on when pagers were becoming popular.

      There was a 'company' that somehow got a hold of large lists of pager number and would page them with their toll number. I think they were charging $90 a minute or something obsurd. I don't remember the outcome, but they were heavily sued by several large parties.

      ~LoudMusic

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    2. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by Alexius · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I saw this warning a while ago, in an email. I figured it was about as realistic as the warnings about my kidneys, but before I told the person that it wasn't true, I called my operator and asked. It turns out, this may be legal, but while I was on the phone, I found something else out. My phone company, PennTelecom will not a.) pass along any third party bills, (except for a long distance provider specified by me), and b.) will not give out any personal information on me. The effect is that if I dial any number that is supposed to collect money from me, the company that is supposed to collect the money has to send me a bill themselves, they can't just add it onto my phone bill. However, they also can't send me a bill because my phone company adheres to their privacy policy and won't give them my name or address.


      I used one of the 10-10 numbers once, and I got a bill from AT&T mailled to me, addressed to one of my aliases. Obviously they'd pulled the name from some marketting database and managed to match up my phone number that way, but they obviously didn't have any actual evidence to force me to pay that bill, or ruin my aliases credit.

      --
      `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
    3. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you're a theif?

    4. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Actually some of those carribian etc long distance calls simply get the normal ammount of money for handling a overseas call (which obviously your phone company will pay for) but have special deal with their phone company in which if they can keep the petirson on the line for a long me, they carrier in that island will give that company a cut of the money made.

    5. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by zbuffered · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you're a troll?

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    6. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by Alexius · · Score: 2

      True, But my phone company doesn't even pass along other carrier's bills to me. I don't have a long distance carrier selected, so if I dial and do get connected at all, then I can presume it's on my local plan. Anything else it's up to who ever I call to set up an account and bill me on their own. Most numbers that expect to get money when I call them expect to get it from my phone company, so they don't bother with me. When my phone company doesn't give it to them, they're at a loss, all they have is my phone number.

      --
      `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
    7. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      So by not having a long distance carrier, you can't make any long distance calls. But, your saying that occasionally, a carrier will mess up and patch you through, and not be able to bill you?.

    8. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by Provincialist · · Score: 1

      This seems odd enough not to be true. If they don't get paid, or only do so after a complicated collections scenario, why wouldn't long distance carriers simply stop connecting PennTel customers?

      --
      I am programmed for etiquette, not destruction!
    9. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by Alexius · · Score: 2

      10-10 Numbers are third party calls, so they patch through. They aren't expected to be my long distance carrier.

      --
      `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
    10. Re:Telemarketers have evolved... by Alexius · · Score: 2
      I promise, it's true. An also, I've noticed that the long distance carriers *have* stopped patching through calls. Occasionally, it seems like I can slip through, but for the most part, 10-10-321 or 220 will give me a message that I need to contact their billing office (with no information on how to do that, FYI.)


      I also think it's an odd circumstance. I'm guessing I asked for extra privacy somewhere along the line, and the two policies clashed.

      --
      `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
  20. satisfaction by Glanz · · Score: 1

    I haven't collected anything but the satisfaction of seeing a few servers get taken down via weaknesses in MS soft..., bu anonymous and benevolent crackers. The only to stop spammers [although I do believe that some of that stupidity is so ridiculous, it's actually fun, as someone just posted] is to develop really good methodologically sound and efficient cracks to take them out.

    --
    Rien n'est plus beau que le creux du 0.
  21. How about $10000? by ndogg · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, you wouldn't necessarily get $10000, but the telemarketing firm would have to pay that in fines if you request that you take your name off their list and they do not do that.

    I've worked for a telemarketer before (yes, I have been to hell and back), and I k now for a fact that we were required to immediately, upon request, take a person or business' name and information off our list without any questions asked. If we did not, the firm was risking a $10000 fine. This is federal law. If a telemarketer continues to bug you after requesting that your name be taken off this list, just remind them if this little law.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:How about $10000? by amunter · · Score: 2, Informative

      If we did not, the firm was risking a $10000 fine. This is federal law.

      I think the federal law you are talking about is the Telephone Consumers Protection Act. The relevant law and complications with using it are analyzed pretty well at Junkbusters U.S. Laws on Telemarketing.

      The amount is not $10000, but $500.

    2. Re:How about $10000? by dirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The hard part is proving you requested to be taken off their list. You usually need to at the least send a letter before it is "official" that you requested to be removed. You can request it when they call, and a lot of them will remove you, but if they don't there is no way for you to prove you requested it. It comes down to your word against theirs, and the burden of proof is on you. So yes, by law they have to remove you if you request it, but if they don't it's up to you to prove you requested it.

      --

      "Information wants to be expensive" - Stewart Brand, the same guy who said "Information wants to be free"
    3. Re:How about $10000? by denzo · · Score: 2

      I don't think, under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, that they could just take you off their list, per se. Otherwise, your name could pop back on their list since they couldn't track if you were previously on the list. Instead, Telemarketers must put you on their "do-not-call" list when you ask them to, and they have to keep your name on that list for 10 years. Then if you still get a call from them, you can sue for $500.

    4. Re:How about $10000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your all computer nerds

    5. Re:How about $10000? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      Telephone-jack to 3.5mm plug adapters: £10 at maplin. Connect to a spare tape-recorder, or be fancy and use your MP3 player/PC audio.

      There's not much excuse for not being able to record phone calls as evidence.

    6. Re:How about $10000? by Aexia · · Score: 2

      There's not much excuse for not being able to record phone calls as evidence.

      Aside from it being illegal most places in the United States.

    7. Re:How about $10000? by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Not if you announce it before you start the recording.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    8. Re:How about $10000? by sehryan · · Score: 1

      The catch is just because you are removed from one list, doesn't mean you are removed from all. If the dialer has your number associated with different campaigns, then saying "Take me off your list" won't get you removed from the other campaigns. To get removed from all campaigns, you have to say something to the effect of "Do not call me again" or "Remove me from all of your lists." Remember, most places contract out telemarketing, so one company is running a lot of different products. By doing the latter, you will fall off more lists faster.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    9. Re:How about $10000? by sehryan · · Score: 1

      They aren't going to argue with you. If you ask to be removed, and then they don't, all you have to do is call them and say "Take me off" and it's done. No letter is needed. No proof is required. Ask for a supervisor and say "I asked to be taken off and I wasn't." That's all it takes.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    10. Re:How about $10000? by dtungsten · · Score: 1

      It's not illegal so long as you notify them that the call is being recorded. Ever hear that message, "this call may be recorded"?

    11. Re:How about $10000? by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Only one party must know that conversation is being recorded. And you are that party.

      Record away.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    12. Re:How about $10000? by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Aside from it being illegal most places in the United States.

      Not quite true.

      The Federal law is one-party. That means that a call can be recorded at the consent of any one party. Most of the states are also one-party, including my home state of Colorado.

      Check your own state law to be sure, but you're usually pretty safe taping incoming calls.

    13. Re:How about $10000? by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      I thought that it was more effective to request to be placed on the "Do Not Call" list. If you simply request to be removed, your number is taken off but can be added again later since they don't have any record of it existing. If you explicitly ask to be placed on "Do Not Call", they must keep a record of your number for X years and they must not call to it in that time.

    14. Re:How about $10000? by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It depends on the state. California for example is a two-party permissions state for any recording. But if you ask, on tape, and they acede, on tape, then you have a legal tape. I suspect you can record them saying no, but recording the argument to get them to agree probably isn't.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    15. Re:How about $10000? by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      Many states require only "one-party" consent (which means that you may unilaterally record a conversation). For interstate calls, the federal law (which is also "one-party" consent) applies.

      This issue came up in the Linda Tripp saga -- since her phone conversations with Monica Lewinsky crossed a state line (Maryland to DC), she was able to legally record them.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    16. Re:How about $10000? by sparkyman · · Score: 1

      It's legal in Minnesota as long as you are one of the parties talking.

      Sure would have come in handy when someone changes their story on the phone......either record it or get it in writing. Sorry, bad experience, thanks for listening :)

    17. Re:How about $10000? by dorsey · · Score: 1

      Actually, you have to say, "put me *on* your do-not-call list." If you say "take me off your list" all that they do is take you off the list they have in front of them at that moment. They'll have a new list tomorrow and your name will be on it.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    18. Re:How about $10000? by ndogg · · Score: 1

      The DO NOT CALL list is the same thing as being taken off the their list in my mind. I probably should have worded it differently because that was the way it worked at the firm I worked for. If someone asked to be off that list, we had to select the DO NOT CALL option. So, really, it's the same thing anyway.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    19. Re:How about $10000? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2

      That must be why Maryland was going to (or did, I don't recall) prosecute Linda Tripp for recording her calls with Monica Lewinski. It absolutely does depend on state law. I don't think I've lived in one yet where you could record calls without consent and notification, although in at least one notification could consist of playing a beep every n seconds and consent the other party not hanging up. As always, accepting legal advice from random people on the net is a horrifically bad idea. As a rule, they don't really know the law and presume too much. Notably, that the law is the way the law should be.

    20. Re:How about $10000? by inburito · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but you also have to bear the cost of small claims court. Sending one of those corporate lawyers over there is not going to be cheap..

      Business class flights, stay at a nice hotel, reimbursement for full time. Even if the consumer in the end gets only 500usd the company has spent a lot more by then.. overall 10kusd might not be a figure far off.

    21. Re:How about $10000? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Course it's not illegal. Why do you think your bank, ISP, etc. write "all calls may be recorded for training and quality assurance purposes" on their literature.

      As the guy says, it's your conversation, you can record it. You don't even need to tell the person you're recording the call.

      Of course, it doesn't really affect me much what's illegal in America, but here in the UK it seems that BT have backed down (or been legislated down) against their "thou shalt not connect unapproved equipment to our phone lines" stance, and there's been a flurry of new recording kit for phones on the market.

      In my standard electronics catalog, there's everything from simple phone-jack-to-3.5mm adapters to recording kits, inductive couplers, digital voice recorders, and even sticky microphones to record mobile phone conversations.

      Personally, I just use an old tape recorder, and find it a great help when my landlord claims not to have agreed something.

  22. This post has been deleted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you think this is unfair, please phone +441454411586! Calls cost $300 a minute!

  23. PS by ndogg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This also explains why some telemarketers would be sending people money. They'd rather pay $500 to $2500 instead of $10000. This is just a way to keep people from saying anything.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  24. an idea by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    I bet you could make money beating up telemarketers!

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try it.

    2. Re:an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya wasting money on things is kewl!!!!111

  25. Been done before by Sase · · Score: 0

    Interestingly enough, this has been done before.

    I submitted a news post entitled:
    2002-03-22 23:38:03 Finally, a way to combat those Spammers! Victims (articles,news) (rejected)

    To slashdot.. but they rejected it :(

    Basically, this guy was a lawyer, and everytime he requested to be taken off a list.. He charged them 25$ or something of that nature.

    He sent an email saying that if they did not remove him, he would charge them for each email received... They didn't comply.

    It eventually turned out to be that the man won in court, and the company settled for all the charges (much over 250)

    See if you can search that out in the DB (if its there) :)

    --
    ------------
    Sase
    "It's the opposite of that."
  26. Small claims by pogen · · Score: 2

    A local telemarketer has ignored my do-not-call requests seven times in the past two years. At $500 a pop, that's quite a bit of money, especially when you consider the possibility of treble damages (it's obvious that they are willfully and knowingly ignoring their do-not-call list, since we've reminded them every time). I've written a letter demanding payment for damages, but how should I proceed if they ignore it? The damages are too high for small claims court. Is it worth the trouble of going for the full amount, or would it be better to lower my sights and stick with small claims? Have any of you ever (successfully) sued a telemarketer for more than $3000?

    1. Re:Small claims by nochops · · Score: 1

      Not only can you sue for damages, but the company is also liable for $10000 per call if they refuse your do-not-call requests.

      --
      "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
    2. Re:Small claims by viking099 · · Score: 2

      shoot, just make sure that the part of the suit against them that details damages (punitive and real) includes lawyer's fees...
      that's not uncommon in many suits, just ask any public (city, county, etc) attorney.
      that way, you get the benefit of your money, and your lawyer is paid for by your opponent!

    3. Re:Small claims by pogen · · Score: 1
      Not only can you sue for damages, but the company is also liable for $10000 per call if they refuse your do-not-call requests.

      They aren't "refusing" the do-not-call requests per se. In fact, they assure me every time that the request will be honored. Then two months later, they call again.

    4. Re:Small claims by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Record it - they are required to put you on their do not call list right on the spot (I've been told by telemarketers before that it can take up to 30 days, though the law says immediatly) and keep you on for 10 years.

    5. Re:Small claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ask them for information on how to contact the FCC, or send me an email at sfritz31918 (random typing, delete me)@ihcc.cc and I'll get the info for you. The FCC can fine them for 10k and u'll get like 1k from it.

      Have you given them at least a month to get thier list synchronized though? Thats a requirment if your simply going on a DNC list.

  27. The story mentions... by nochops · · Score: 1

    The story mentions that this is Washington state law.

    Does anyone know what other states this law applies to? I'd love to do this, as I get on average 10 telemarketing calls a day.

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
    1. Re:The story mentions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      >> I get on average 10 telemarketing calls a day

      Could you please explain to me what in gay hell you are doing to get TEN telemarketing calls per day? I don't get that many calls in ONE YEAR. This is like people who say that they had to format their hard drive again because they got another virus. I've been using computers since the C64 and I have not once ever gotten a virus. My point? You people must in some way be bringing this upon yourselves by giving your phone-number out willy-nilly

  28. Well I'm no lawyer, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    so I wouldn't know about using the law to get back at spammers (as in the article), but here in redneck country we have much more effective methods.

    For example, just last Tuesday I got $574 dollars and a $200 Rolex from a salesman who failed to notice the "no solicitors" sign on my front gate. He said he'd sue for excessive force and I said he's welcome to have his other eye blacked out too, and to get the fuck out of my house before I take that spiffy suit to go with my new rolex.

    Must be new to the area.

    1. Re:Well I'm no lawyer, by zbuffered · · Score: 1

      $200 rolex? what did you get, the minute hand?

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    2. Re:Well I'm no lawyer, by Uncommon+Troll · · Score: 0

      Dude, the watch is fake and I bet the suit was off the rack.

      --
      My real account keeps getting labeled as a troll...
    3. Re:Well I'm no lawyer, by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      You should have gone "Deliverance" on him....

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  29. One of the easiest ways to avoid this is... by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

    Get an unpublished phone number. I know, it costs $$$ but I think it's worth it. My wife wanted one for personal reasons and I've received 2-3 calls in 3 years, and those were from the stupid phone company. At that point and time, I told them this number was unlisted, take me off your calling list, and they later sent me a letter confirming my request.

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:One of the easiest ways to avoid this is... by fataugie · · Score: 1
      My wife wanted one for personal reasons

      Tell her all I want is my shoes from under the bed!

      --

      WTF? Over?

    2. Re:One of the easiest ways to avoid this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope... I was getting 2-3 calls from Miss Cleo every day (my ex wife called her once from my house the week before she became my ex...)

    3. Re:One of the easiest ways to avoid this is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get an unpublished phone number. I know, it costs $$$ but I think it's worth it.

      And how do you propose to keep it unlisted when I start dialing your area code from 000-0000 to 999-9999?

  30. Telemarketing Calls by karnal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't receive any telephone calls from telemarketers (that block their ID), since I've got this nifty little "privacy manager" service.

    Basically, it just asks the caller for their name, and then prompts me whether I wanna accept or deny (similar to collect calls). I notice that nowadays I have 0 messages on my answering machine, whereas before, I'd get 2-3 junk calls a day.

    Also, whenever I sign up for "advertising" promotions (kroger plus card, big bear card, etc) I use my modem line. I've actually heard someone call it, probably to the tune of once a month. I can imagine their suprise when they hear the modem on the other end..... :)

    --
    Karnal
    1. Re:Telemarketing Calls by xTK-421x · · Score: 1

      Out West it's called Privacy Manager, but in the Northeast it's called Call Intercept. Number of telespam I've gotten per day has gone from 2-3 to 0. Either the autodialers can't handle the automated prompt to record their name, or the telemarketers know they have no sale and just hang up instead of recording their name.

      --
      "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
    2. Re:Telemarketing Calls by RustySawDust · · Score: 1

      Almost without fail, calls that show up as "PRIVATE" are loved ones with unlisted numbers that I want to talk to. Calls that show up as "UNAVAILABLE" or "OUT OF AREA" are always telemarketers. The problem with verizon's service is that it blocks both.

      What I wouldn't give for a caller id phone that would ring for private and not unavailable. Maybe I should just buy a caller id modem and code the damn thing myself.

    3. Re:Telemarketing Calls by xTK-421x · · Score: 1

      Hmm... you know that the service provides a PIN code that the second the person hears the prompt, they can press it on the phone and they go through without further delay? For instance, on my phone I have one friend who doesn't transmit CID, so I gave him the PIN and now he gets through without a problem. Unless the fact that they have to enter the PIN is a problem for you too.

      --
      "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
    4. Re:Telemarketing Calls by RustySawDust · · Score: 1

      What if my loved one is in trouble and is tired, upset, drunk, unorganized or maybe has just "fallen and can't get up" and can't find the PIN ? I don't want to make it a pain in the ass for the people I want calling me to call me !

      It seems like it would be so easy to make a phone like I described, I'm really surprised they don't make them. If I were more a paranoid person I'd say it was a DMA conspiracy.

    5. Re:Telemarketing Calls by Asprin · · Score: 1

      In our area (SBC Ameritech - NE Ohio), it's called Privacy Manager, and WOW, does it work. We moved into a new house, ordered a private unpublished number, and within a week, were getting 2-3 calls a day. Then we ordered CID + PM and we haven't gotten a single marketing call since. I just wish I could get the marketers to pay for it (around $12/month for CID + PM).

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
  31. Destroying the telemarketing industry. by defile · · Score: 5, Funny

    See this page for a method that would surely destroy the telemarketing industry if enough companies did it.

    1. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by behrman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suppose we're starting to mildly drift off topic, here, but I've actually been doing this sort of thing (at home) for some time now. While I can't exactly transfer the telemarketers around, I do find great entertainment in keeping them on the phone for quite a while (once I managed to hold one captive for about a half hour), feigning interest, passing the phone around to various members of the household (works best when I'm visiting my parents, and I have half a dozen or more bored people at my disposal), or just acting(?) very stupid and making them explain things over and over. Naturally, when get bored with them, I'll cheerfully wish them a good (day|evening|weekend) and remind them to put me on their do not call list.

      I even managed to get some form of sweet revenge with the Lexington, KY newspaper. I was called one evening, at home, and told about some special weekend offer for home-delivery. Understand that ordinarily I would refuse, simply on principle. The irony is that I had *just* finished looking up the number for home-delivery, so that I could take it with me to work the next day and order home-delivery. I figured that in this ONE case, they actually had good timing, and a service that I was going to buy *anyway*, so... fine: I'd order the paper. One problem: the woman that called me could *ONLY* sell me their weekend package, and I wanted the full-blown, 7-day-a-week, normal-price service. I was dumbfounded.

      So, the next day, I gave the paper a telephone call and asked to be connected to new subscriptions. I was connected to a very helpful gentleman who explained the whole subscription plan to me about seven or eight times and then I told him the story that I just related. I explained to him that I was a customer that was ready to buy -- all they had to do was take my money. I then told him that because of that experience I was no longer interested in receiving the paper, and that I would be buying the Cincinnati newspaper at my local Kroger instead. He got rather offended at this, and accused me of calling just to waste their valuable time. I somehow supressed a laugh and told him that I knew *EXACTLY* how he felt, since that's the feeling I had after their telemarketing call.

      All in all, I doubt that anyone there will ever notice, or even know how I felt about the whole thing... but, still, making an unsolicited call to a telemarketer (yeah, I know, it was just to the company that contracted a telemarketer, but, still) just seemed to drip with delicious irony.

    2. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Croaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmm... imagine what could be done with this technique given:

      1. A reserved phone extension someplace.
      2. A phone sound card connection for this phone.
      3. A PC with voice recognition/voice synthesis software. Voice synthesis would have to be very convincing... perhaps just using canned voice samples. For voice recognition, you might only have to catch a phrase here or there, or maybe just detect silence.
      4. Faux "AI" software, such as Eliza or Racter. Perhaps seeded with marketspeak phrases ("yes, but what's the ROI?", "How do you address the currently shifting business paradigms?") The longer the conversation gets, the more surreal and random the AI should get ("Is it effective on monkeys? Our server room is full of monkeys. Flying ones. They glow blue. And they are tiny.") The AI should also throw out bones form time to time, to keep the marketeer on the hook ("Excellent!" "I can see a need for this in our organization, RIGHT NOW!").
      5. An MP3 server to let everyone else listen to the precious sounds of a telemarketer slowly going insane.
    3. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweet god yes! I'd pay for such a thing! I'd pay to just listen to such a thing! Someone mod this up!

    4. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by swb · · Score: 2

      This won't work universally.

      Most legitimate sales people with any experience will see through this ruse in a minute. They'll quickly stop wasting time on your company and move on. They won't sell this "contact" information to anyone. Sales leads that produce sales are valuable and can be sold. Sales leads that don't produce sales are junk and only tar the seller.

      Many businesses, especially those that have sales forces, will not pursue this strategy because they value sales contacts, even if they don't buy anything. Some sales people are interesting to talk to and can provide valuable information, even stuff they're not selling.

      Sure, there are some sleazy sales people but they're easy to hang up on. But there's a lot of legitimate people trying to do business.

    5. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by quantaman · · Score: 2

      Great idea, one problem though.
      Mr. Feynman doesn't exist!

      He doesn't? He's one of the worlds leading physicists, I'm reading one of his books right now! Now research will be slowed to a crawl because he will be eternaly tormented by telemarketers!!
      Damn you! Damn you all to hell!!

      --
      I stole this Sig
    6. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Whatcha need to do is come up with a clever hack that gets the telemarketers to call back on a toll number. A toll number that just happens to benefit your bank account.

    7. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      The AI should also throw out bones form time to time, to keep the marketeer on the hook ("Excellent!" "I can see a need for this in our organization, RIGHT NOW!").

      Er, no, and that's the problem with this suggestion. If the AI says anything that can be plausibly represented as consent, the telemarketer can use the "bone" on you (e.g. "slam" your long-distance service to the carrier he's selling).

      Pity -- your idea sounds like it would have great entertainment value.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    8. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by BarefootClown · · Score: 3, Funny

      What ever happened to the good ol' days, before all of this digital switching crap, when the lines were directly connected by copper running from my phone to his? The days when telemarketers could be dealt with by liberal application of a 25-kV spark coil? Never did have a return call from those companies...

      --

      "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
      --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    9. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Not if they don't have authorization. Here, if the phone isn't billed in your name, you can't change any of the plans. Otherwise, they could phone up your four-year-old, tell her they'll give her a popsicle if she switches carriers, and slam you. Obviously, your AI phone machine can't commit to any financial plans without your approval. It's not that smart.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    10. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Well then it's an even better name to use, since he's dead.

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    11. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Steve+B · · Score: 1

      Of course they wouldn't have legitimate authorization. That's why I used the term "slamming", which refers specifically to switching a victim's long-distance service by this sort of trickery.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    12. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 2

      Well, then you can sue them, and buy an even better AI to do all your work, and retire to your winter home on the coast of Spain!

      --
      "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
    13. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by philovivero · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter if enough companies do it. You can get off all their call lists by doing such things.

      A friend of mine, whenever a telemarketer calls him, says: "Hell yes I'm interested. I really need that! Let me go turn off the lawn-mower and I'll be right back."

      Put down the phone. Check every fifteen minutes or so and when they finally give up on you, hang it up.

      Believe me, they will *NEVER* call you again.

    14. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      *snort*

      As a buisness that had 200+ phone lines slammed, at a cost of $20 a piece (+ $10/month) I can assure you that they come out ahead.

      Despite the fact that we went ahead and called their notary number to be recorded saying "No", despite the fact that there are slammed numbers on our bill that don't belong to us, and despite the fact that the numbers slammed were marked "DO NOT EVER CHANGE PIC" ...

      We're still considered to owe the money.

      Don't joke about getting slammed, it might just happen to you.

    15. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      While that would be hard to do to make money for yourself, I've always wanted to find one of those 20 dollar a minute secret toll numbers, the ones that start with 011- and most people don't realize are long distance to another country.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    16. Re:Destroying the telemarketing industry. by gfreeman · · Score: 1
      That explains all the phone calls I keep getting.



      P.J. Feynman

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  32. Do you have somewhere we can read this law? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it would be nice if we could get a copy of this law. Print it out, set it by the phone, wait for the telies and the start reading....

  33. I'm going to look into this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all the spam, phone calls and faxes I get I could probably make a couple of grand also. The spam and phone calls are annoying but the faxes cost me money. That thermal paper isn't cheap.

    1. Re:I'm going to look into this by Uncommon+Troll · · Score: 0

      ..time to buy a new fax machine dude..

      --
      My real account keeps getting labeled as a troll...
  34. Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is more information on the state of Indiana's anti-telemarketing law that was recently passed, and everything that goes along with it.

    We might not have daylight savings time, but at least we are trying to keep out telemarketers. I suggest you look over the text of the law before making any comments, since it provides many ways for people to legally call you, such as not-for-profit orgs using their own volunteers, etc. Anyway, I think it has helped tremendously, and I'm still waiting for a business to get sued over it to really enforce it. (That will be the true test of the law.)

    I also believe it is being challenged by a number of groups right now. At least it is a step in the right direction. Heck, the attorney general based his entire last campaign on this issue alone.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by JayAndSilentBob · · Score: 1

      We might not have daylight savings time

      You say that like it's bad. DST is just plain stupid. Let's fool ourselves by resetting the clocks!

      --


      Love,
      Jay and Silent Bob
    2. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid unless you like sleeping when it's dark and being awake when it's not.

    3. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      DST makes sense. Since we all are set in rigid schedules with school and work, we can simply adjust our clocks to provide more time awake with the sun in the sky. Before we all had to be at work or school at 7 or 8, people went to sleep and woke up with the sun, since it made sense to be awake when the sun was out. They followed daylight savings time without realizing it =] (Although, they adjusting in small amounts throughout the year.)

      Anyway, there are numerous businesses who have avoided our state due to the lack of DST. It makes international business difficult, and is a pain in the ass when the 4 corners of the state are all on different time zones, while the rest is on EST. There's significant debate on this issue each year in the statehouse, nothing ever gets done; but something might soon.

      The only arguments I've seen against it are 'Farmers will spend more time in the fields', 'Kids will wait for buses in the dark', etc. I don't understand most of these arguments, since a farmer will only spend as much time in the field as necessary, and if DST is done properly, kids are less likely to be waiting for the bus in the dark.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by broller · · Score: 1

      Kentucky just passed a similar law. You can even sign-up for the no call list online. It goes into effect in mid-July.

      Unfortunately, there are some exceptions to the No-Call list, including:

      3. Calls from businesses with whom you have a prior or existing relationship;

      Which rules out the annoying Verizon DSL calls I'm getting now because I use them for local phone service. Two or three times each month they call to offer me DSL service that I'm already getting from them.

    5. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by MacBrave · · Score: 1

      I live in Indiana have opted-in to the telemarketer law. So far I have had not calls since 1/1/2002.

      The only interesting thing that happened was that recently I got a knock on the door from a volunteer representing the local high school music department. He asked me to sign a form that would give them permission to call me in regards to future fund-raising events. I signed the form since I don't mind supporting local non-profits and charities. I guess one side effect of this law is that non-profits now have to work harder to solicit doncations.

      As for DST, I certainly could do without it. I lived in Michigan for 8 years and absolutely hated changing my clocks.

    6. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by ruvreve · · Score: 2
      We might not have daylight savings time

      Parts of Indiana DO have daylight savings time. I like to think of Northwest Indiana as the more advanced portion of the state that is ranked 50th in technology related jobs. I mean we didn't even beat Rhode Island...RHODE ISLAND...geez....

      *turns and pouts*

    7. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Yeah, NW, SW, SE all have DST, because they are close to major metropolitan areas that are on a different time zone, so the only way to really effectively get business done is to adopt the timezone of the big city near by, otherwise you're going to be on the same time or an hour off half the year, which is a big problem. If the whole state went one way or the other it'd solve many problems. Northwest Indiana would be more advanced if Gary wasn't there to give us that prestigious Murder Capitol of the World title or whatever it is.

      Indiana: Top Ranked in: Syphilis, Obesity, Smoking, Murder (in Gary at least).
      Bottom Ranked in: Education (K-12), Jobs, and right now competent politicians who can't pass a friggin budget for crap but have no problem trying to pass a law to indemnify themselves of all past wrongdoings!

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      The thing with DST is that Indiana can either try to make the rest of the world get off DST, or can adopt it to allow ease of interstate and international commerce. Which one is more plausible? It's not even a matter of whether or DST itself is a good thing, it'd be like not having trains, and forcing everyone who wants to do business with us to fly stuff in, guess what's going to happen? The places will go somewhere else, because there is no way we'll get everyone else to drop rail transport in favor of airplanes (hazardous waste?). It would make more sense for us to adobt rail transport than to make everyone else drop it. Same thing with DST.

      --
      What?
    9. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gah, I can't type this morning. My apologies for all missing words and typos in advance =]

    10. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      The thing with DST is that Indiana can either try to make the rest of the world get off DST, or can adopt it to allow ease of interstate and international commerce.

      I don't get why non-universality of DST is a problem for interstate and international commerce. In those situations, don't you have to deal with different times anyway, due to different timezones?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    11. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We might not have daylight savings time, ...

      You say that is if it were a bad thing. At best, I think, daylight savings time is a stupid test that our governments administer twice a year, to see if the sheep are still following uncritically to the the slaughterhouse. Notice how it comes immediately before and some months after tax time (15 April here in the US).

      That the people in Indiana haven't fallen for it speaks surprisingly well for their good sense. I recently spent five years there, and it was farily tolerable. If they had an ocean and some mountains, I might not have left.

    12. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      I live in West Lafayette, IN, and am on the telemarketing block list. However, this morning, I got a call asking for money from who else? - the Indiana Police Department. Apparently, they don't make enough off of harassing people who go through yellow lights, and they need more money. I don't see how the Police classify as a "not for profit" organization, as they sure seem to try to make a buck. I think the law should apply to the police, too, but apparently it doesn't.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    13. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 2
      I've included an excerpt from here. That will provide some insight into it. Also, I know that at least Paine Webber downtown has to come into work an hour earlier half the year so that they are open when the market is. It's a pain in the neck for airlines and travelers. It's not that it's a different time, it's that the time difference changes depending on what time of year it is, thus making it confusing as to what the time in Indiana (or elsewhere if you live in Indiana) is.



      Business, Economic & Sales Opportunities:
      "Time uniformity is critically important to consumer convenience and to the complicated task of flight scheduling. Obviously, if states exempt themselves from uniform time standards, various arrival and departure times would change, necessitating a revamping of schedules and possible elimination of flights."
      William J. Burhop, Senior V.P. Air Transport Assoc. of America
      Testimony before US Congress, April 24, 1985

      --
      What?
    14. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 1

      I think there was a special exception for them. It was probably the FOP, which I believe might be a not for profit organization? Anyone know for sure?

      --
      What?
    15. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      Thanks to electricity, why does it matter if we have more time awake with the sun out?
      We need to pick one time and stick with it.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    16. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 1
      I think there was a special exception for them. It was probably the FOP, which I believe might be a not for profit organization? Anyone know for sure?

      I don't know about Indiana specifically, but most such lists exempt not-for-profit orgs.

      Yes, FOP is a not-for-profit. Some of their state lodges aggressively telemarket for specific charitable programs, others don't. I couldn't tell you what the Colorado lodges are doing.

      It might also have been a different professional organization. I'm willing to bet that IN has a handful of state organizations besides FOP.

      I doubt it was a department, though. Government agencies aren't generally allowed to accept donations, never mind solicit them.

      FWIW, we had this problem here in CO a few years ago, where some of the police professional organizations got involved with telemarketers. As it happened, the teledirtbags were pocketing about 90% of the donations to cover their "marketing costs." That's common enough that I never donate money to any charity that cold-calls me anymore.

    17. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by eaolson · · Score: 1
      I don't get why non-universality of DST is a problem for interstate and international commerce. In those situations, don't you have to deal with different times anyway, due to different timezones?

      Yes, but at least then the time zones are always consistently off. New York is always four hours ahead of L.A. I live in eastern Illinois, and occasionally have to catch a flight at the Indianapolis airport (nearest major one). I can't tell you how big a pain in the a** it is to have to remember that the time at the airport is an hour ahead of me in the winter and the same time in the summer. Or, wait, is it an hour behind in the summer and the same time in the winter? Dammit...
    18. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indiana is on time with CDT in the summer and EDT in the winter. We consider ourselves to be part of EST, which I guess means that in the summer, the rest of the nation moves to the east one time zone and we stay put. So, right now, we are on the same time as OH. (I ran into this problem myself having to catch flights in Dayton, OH, and I live in Indianapolis (so much cheaper to leave from somewhere other than Indy Int'l.))

    19. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 2

      woops, actually, right now we are on the same time as Illinois. Proof that this is too stinkin' confusing. =]

      --
      What?
    20. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by JayAndSilentBob · · Score: 1

      Actually, I work 3rd shift. You learn very quickly to dissociate any particular time with being "normal." Personally, I'd prefer that the world run on millitary-style GMT and be done with it. No more troubles with time zones. You say to someone in Singapore call at 14:30 and you'll get a phone call at 14:30. No more confusion about who's time to use or what time it is someplace far away. This is a long-overdue change in peoples' worldview.

      --


      Love,
      Jay and Silent Bob
    21. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, if states exempt themselves from uniform time standards, various arrival and departure times would change, necessitating a revamping of schedules and possible elimination of flights."

      William J. Burhop, Senior V.P. Air Transport Assoc. of America
      Testimony before US Congress, April 24, 1985

      Typical arrogant, snot-nosed threat from corporate types trying to sap us into submission. What the living fuck do these guys think God made computers for if not to take care of silly shit like this? Will no one shove something sharp, hot and unlubed up this guy's butt?

    22. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how old the equipment in use in the airline industry is? Cost of replacement isn't feasible yet, so no, computers can't really solve this problem.

      It would kill you if a 'typical arrogant, snot-nosed... corporate type,' actually made one valid statement wouldn't it? Go back in your little hole, the rest of us have more important things to do than teach you about the world.

      --
      What?
    23. Re:Indiana is trying at least. by TrollBurger · · Score: 1

      Your tubby friend loves the cock

  35. Defeating Spam by Bug-Man · · Score: 0

    I recently received a spam message from a company which contained a HTML formatted message which downloaded a number of pornographic images from a website in Hong Kong.

    Since this was an obvious spam message, I decided to look into it further, and found the email address of the server's "Technical Contact" through a whois query.

    I have since submitted an email to the person claiming that the email was not only intrusive, but a clear case for sexual harassment.

    I mean -- how can you justify sending unsolicited pornographic images to someone? The email they sent it to was not only my work address, but the subject of the message was "Regarding your enquiry." A message like this is obviously something you would normally open, because it could legitimately be anything. Low and behold, porn-o-rama.

    I have not yet received a response from these clowns, and stated clearly in my email to him the following items:

    - I have sent a copy of the email in question and a copy of the email i sent to the webmaster to my lawyer.

    - The content of the email was unacceptable for a work corporate email address.

    - The content of the email is a form of sexual harassment, of which I may have a case in court for.

    - The email was intrusive and unsolicited.

    I don't know if I'll get a response or not -- but I hope at least something comes of it.. I don't like spam, and this one went too far.

    The next step? Well, they do have a telephone contact on the WHOIS query, and I can only try!

  36. Larger Photo by NerdMachine · · Score: 1


    I love it when under the picture of a chubby guy sticking out his belly, they write Click for a larger photo

    --
    --NerdMachine
    1. Re:Larger Photo by msm1th · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Larger Photo by berniecase · · Score: 1

      Just personal observation.... there's certainly no science behind it. :-)

  37. Do you have a local spam law? by bmongar · · Score: 2

    Checkout Spamcon to see if there is a local law allowing you to sue spammers.

    --
    As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
    1. Re:Do you have a local spam law? by bmongar · · Score: 2

      Oops I meant this link the other one was just for missouri.

      --
      As x approaches total apathy I couldn't care less.
  38. It's just another ploy... by spellcheckur · · Score: 1
    My immediate reaction to this article: "Now that's an easy way to make money without a lot of effort."

    Then I realized that /. was just pushing another "get rich quick" scheme.

  39. list of states and laws regarding telemarketing by zteknofreak · · Score: 1

    i was trying to find a page that would specifically tell me which states support/do not support automated telemarketing, but this seems to be what there is on this. http://www.auto-dialers.net/statelaws.html

    --
    --------- unix, because rebooting is for adding new hardware.
    1. Re:list of states and laws regarding telemarketing by zteknofreak · · Score: 1

      on a related [sort of] note, massachusetts needs a better search engine for their .gov.

      --
      --------- unix, because rebooting is for adding new hardware.
  40. Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by ProfBooty · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw an ad last night for some device which I believe was sold by the sharper image which you hook up to your phoneline. The device then dectects if an autodialer has been used and then claims to delete you from their database.

    As I recall it was called the telezapper. And costs around 50 bucks.

    http://www.telezapper.com/

    From their website:
    The TeleZapper is designed to "zap" calls made by predictive dialer computers by doing two things: first, by disconnecting predictive-dialed calls before you can be connected to a live telemarketer and second, by deleting your phone number from telemarketing computer lists. Whether the TeleZapper will affect computer-dialed calls from other sources depends on the type of computer equipment and how that equipment is being used. Therefore, it may also "zap" calls from other organizations that use predictive dialer computers, such as charitable organizations, blood banks, public safety and service organizations, market researchers, opinion and political pollsters, and academic institutions.

    They "delete" you from the database by sending a line disconect signal. I don't know of anyone who has used this device so I can't attest to how well it works.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    1. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by jeffy124 · · Score: 2

      we had an askslashdot on that device a several months ago, asking similar questions and also how it actually worked.

      but as for how well it works -- my local news did a test of it sometime in the past few months. they had someone (who works from home) record day&time of calls for two weeks, noting who from, etc, and not requesting removal. then they plugged in the telezapper. after two weeks, the number of calls dropped drastically.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by GLX · · Score: 1

      Verizon in PA (and I know they've had this for awhile in TX..) has "Call Intercept" now, where if the caller ID is blocked or Out Of Area, it rings straight to this automated-attendant type thing..

      They can either hit a 4 digit PIN (say it's a family member...) and it will ring straight through to your phone... Or, they can record their name and you will get a stuttered ring on your phone and when you answer, the persons name plays and you can either accept the call, reject it with a "Remove me from your list, I don't like telemarketers", or send it to your home voicemail service (if you subscribe)...

      If it's a predictive/autodialer, they never get through because it requires at least one touch-tone be pressed and the caller actually say something.

      Where I used to get 3-5 telemarketing or dead air calls a day, I now get none... Nifty, and well worth the $4.00. Works better than the Telezapper IMO.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    3. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by cholokoy · · Score: 1

      I saw on the local news here in Detroit about this device and they were interviewing a user of the devise who vouches for its effectiveness in screening calls. So I guess they were effective but I do not have one and cannot vouch for it so YMMV.

      ------
      Return the bells of Balangiga.

      --
      Return the bells of Balangiga.
    4. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by dbitter1 · · Score: 4, Informative
      My girlfriend has one. It makes a short beep sound whenever someone picks up the phone (any in the house.) Someday I might go over there with an o-scope and see what frequency it is and post it somewhere...

      In theory, these also work to various degrees if sent down the line:
      NC - No Circuit Found: 985.2 Hz, 380.0 ms; 1428.5 Hz, 380.0 ms; 1776.7 Hz, 380.0 ms
      IC - Operator Intercept: 913.8 Hz, 274.0 ms; 1370.6 Hz, 274.0 ms; 1776.7 Hz, 380.0 ms
      VC - Vacant Circuit: 985.2 Hz, 380.0 ms; 1370.6 Hz, 274.0 ms; 1776.7 Hz, 380.0 ms
      RO - Reorder (system busy): 913.8 Hz, 274.0 ms;1428.5 Hz, 380.0 ms; 1776.7 Hz, 380.0 ms

      --
      For us carnivores, "Sucking the marrow out of life" isn't a transcendentalist philosophy but a practical instruction.
    5. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      those actually don't work very well on most systems. You will be better off spending the money on a stamp and getting your name on the national Do not call list, for less than a dollar.

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    6. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Four bucks for that, seven bucks for CallerID, and uncountable zillions of dollars to sell the bypass service for both to the telemarketing industry.

      Gosh, I wish I was the phone company.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by sehryan · · Score: 1

      I figured thats how these worked. I used to run a predictive dialer, and I knew there was no way to have it "delete" your number. However, faking a disconnect or a fax machine or something like that will get your number removed very quickly, since the dialer admin should be running all the bad numbers on file against the database when it comes in, if it hasn't been done already.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    8. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by cvanaver · · Score: 1

      I have a procedure that is very similar to what this 'telezapper' device does...

      When the phone rings I pick it up and say 'hello' once and if someone doesn't immediately say 'hello' back (or worse, if I hear the clicking of some kind of phone switch) I hang up. Then, when I get into work the next day I punch the DBA who sits down the hallway from me to 'remove my name from the database' (sometimes while saying 'zap'). Studies have shown that my technique is 40% more effective than the 'telezapper'.

    9. Re:Auto Dialer Delete? Telezapper by terkozer · · Score: 1

      A local ABC affiliate here in Seattle did a news story on it a little while ago. For the most part, the couple of people they interviewed seemed to think it was pretty effective. Here's the story

  41. Working from home by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2
    A home page testimonial says that "Anthony P., a former corporate employee, now works from home and earns over $35,000 per month!"

    Yeah, work from home by just picking up telemarketers' calls, and then collect the loot...

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  42. Telemarketers by Jonny+Balls · · Score: 4, Funny

    When ever telemarketers call me, i usually play songs on the keypad. mary had a little lamb usually goes over well

    --
    --JonnyBlog
    1. Re:Telemarketers by Cubeman · · Score: 1

      http://michaelvincent.iwarp.com/songs/

  43. A new spam idea by pudge_lightyear · · Score: 1

    I've got an idea for a new product/service...I'm planning on sending it out ALL over the internet. I got some cds with millions of email addresses and everything.
    All right...stay with me...here's the idea:
    Make money suing spam senders
    Are you looking for a great way to make money? Are you tired of getting hundreds of emails a day from people you don't know making recommendations for products you don't care about?
    Are you tired of your education keeping you back?
    We can help...For 50.00 we'll teach you how to turn those unwanted spam into a serious business....

    oh wait...that wouldn't work

  44. Just drive it over to the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Just drive it over to the guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's close to Wabash. Should be near a Matrix exit as well...

  45. Funny thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a pop under ad when clicking the link to this story... I'd rather have a telemarketer calling me... at least I can flame them back.

  46. What about Canada? by kawaichan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does Canada have a similar law regarding to this as well?

    --

    kawai
    1. Re:What about Canada? by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 1

      Here's a government page about telemarketing law in Canada:
      http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/ct01067e.html

      There doesn't seem to be the $500 kickback kinda deal, but they can get fined up to $20,000 for violating the law. Bill C-6 deals with telemarketing too (do not call lists and such, I think). Unfortunately Junkbusters only gives the USA situation the full treatment.

  47. This is insane by WD_40 · · Score: 1

    Can I sue slashdot for posting these "Sue a spammer" stories every week?

    --

    "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine." -- RFC 1925

    1. Re:This is insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, dumbass, because /. doesn't call you on the fucking phone.

      If you're going to troll, at least be amusing.

  48. Re:Hey everybody, my linux box crashed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like a hardware failure related problem to me. Generic RAM??

  49. File separately. by TheMCP · · Score: 3, Informative

    File a separate suit over each incident in which they called you illegally. I would guess that the small claims court's limit would allow for a $500 suit. (Wouldn't it?)

    It'll be slightly more of a pain in the ass for you, and you'll have to pay the seven filing fees, but it's probably easier and cheaper than hiring a lawyer and going to a full regular court over it.

  50. Maybe not.... by truesaer · · Score: 2

    Most telemarketing systems call a bunch of people (say 4) at a time, then connect the first person who picks up to the available operator. That way they don't waste time on people who aren't home, etc. This is why you get so many hangups when you answer your phone....they don't need you anymore.

    1. Re:Maybe not.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, at least the system I was on, each TSR would only call one person at a time, but they would only wait so long (somtimes as low as 12 seconds) for a pickup, then the machine would start dialing the next number.

  51. META Spam anyone? by sluggie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Hey, asdasd!

    Do you want to get rid of all those spammers? You can earn BIG MONEY by suing them.. bla bla bla...

    Just click here to buy the unique 'How to sue the bad guys' whitepaper for just 9.99!

    This is a one time opportunity! Request it now and get instant access to our pr0n affiliates for free!"

  52. pennsylvania law by mach-5 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pennsylvania just passed a law that could make telemarketers liable for up to $3000 for each call. The new law allows residents to be placed on a "Do Not Call" list. The list will be made publicly available to telemarkets, and if they make the call then they get zapped with the fine. Here is the press release.

    1. Re:pennsylvania law by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's $10,000 and a federal law. There is a federal DNC list that you should be registering at. You won't be seeing that 10k though, because the FCC steals about 9k of it.

      You can also tell the telemarketer (calmly) "please place me on the do not call list" and they will stop calling you (trust me, it works. They aern't idoits and they will put you on a DNC list). If you don't say the word list they are NOT legally required to stop calling you, so "please stop calling me" or "don't call here again" or "I dont take these kind of calls" will all be ignored, and you will probably be laughed at for being an idoit.

      If you spaz on a telemarketer, they probably mute you and start laughing at your idocy. It requires no effort to get off of all telemarketing lists, forever, yet people like you seem to think that its a huge thing.

      TCPA was passed in '92, why don't you learn a little more about it if you hate telemarketers so much. It's the law you should be worried about, and it only requires a quick call to the FCC to get everything rolling.

      If you think I'm just making stuff up, I used to work at a telemarketing house in college, with alot of other college kids who were trying to make money. In general, there are some fuckups (I know one kid who lied to about everyone he called) but most telemarketers are just doing thier job. If you don't want them to, just say "Put me on the do not call list please", wait for them to say "goodbye" after rattling a little speech, and hang up. It's not hard, and it's idoits like you who give telemarkters a bad name, because your too stupid to learn your own rights.

      (It's also interesting that the same people who hate telemarketers are the ones who think that telephone CSR's owe them something, the amusing part is most often they work for the same outsourcing company -- and often will call one day and take calls the next)

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    2. Re:pennsylvania law by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2
      If I'm not mistaken the federal "Do Not Call" list is still a proposal. Plenty of state-level ones, though; I'm looking at the one for Florida right now.

      Still, a 10-grand fine for the telemarketer and I _only_ get to keep 10% of it? Fine by me!

      --
      Dyolf Knip
    3. Re:pennsylvania law by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 1
      If I'm not mistaken the federal "Do Not Call" list is still a proposal. Plenty of state-level ones, though; I'm looking at the one for Florida right now.

      The Federal Trade Commission has kicked around the idea. It's basically a proposal of a proposal at this point.

      However, each telemarketer is required by law to maintain a "do not call" list and to immediately add any number to it at the owner's request. If a teledirtbag calls you after you've asked to be added to the list, you have a civil claim against them. The damages are fixed by statute at $500/violation, or up to $1500 for "knowing" violations, and are recoverable in small-claims court.

      If that's an issue for you, I'd suggest just going to your county/circuit/whatever-your-state- calls-it court and ask about the small-claims filing procedures. Here in Colorado, I'd ask at your county court. In some states, small-claims courts are run by the state's Consumer Affairs office. I think California is one of the latter.

  53. Call Screener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One device that can help you "Collect" money from the telemarketers is the Call Screener.

    http://callscreener.auctionpals.com/

    Automaticaly gets the telemarketers off you line... way better than the telezapper.

    heyday

  54. I won 3500 and am suing a few others for 5x that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here in NJ, when most of these companies are located out west or south, it's easy. I sue for 499 a pop, they never show, auto judgement for me, and if they refuse to pay I can fill out and file for free an asset seizure on their bank accounts.

    The deal is that anything sent to my business domain name is for business (in or out). I clearly have a statement at the bottom of the site that states that unsolicited email will result in an hourly charge, with a two hour minimum for my services and time. The judges here crack up when they see that, but they have yet to rule against me. I just don't do it enough to be annoying to them.

    Specifically, I have filters with auto responders in place stating that the email was unsolicited and that I reserve the right to bill them for time and expenses per my companies standard policy. My email details that they should remove me from their list and immediately disclose the source from which they acquired my private email (which is NOT listed on the site or given out freely on the net). If they don't respond, fine, if they respond negatively or I recieve email from them again unsolicited, I sue. If they actually hand over their source for the mail address (a few have), I sue that company for disclosing my private email and information without permission (that suit is automatic by the way in NJ).

    Most just remove me and don't send any more mail, a few are irate and spam me some more or repsond directly in a derisive way (they get sued), a couple have given me their sources and remove me from the list, and a few even apologize (usually the larger, more legitimate outfits).

    So far I have spent about four hours in court (I only make 175-200 an hour, so I profited here) and about six hours on the net or working towards filtering and responding. I laugh my ass off at the ireate repsonses, and even more when I have their bank acount frozen until they pay their legal obligation to me settled by default in small claims court.

  55. Another way to make money off of telemarketers by marekk · · Score: 1
    Around 20 states have "do not call" lists where telemarketers are required by state law to not call anyone on the said list. Furthermore, there has been a proposal to create a national do-not-call list. That page not only lists the details of the proposed national do-not-call list, but also the states that have their own do-not-call list. Check it out to see if your state has one.

    Missouri (the state where I reside) has such a list and it is completely free to sign up (some states charge a nominal yearly fee to be on the list). Under Missouri law, any telemarketer calling someone one the no-call list is automatically subject to a $5,000 fine! Complaints against telemarketers can be filed online to the MO Attorney General, who has been very agressive in enforcing this law.

    Let the FTC know that you are in support of the national do-not-call registry. Below is the information on how you can contact the FTC to let them know how you feel about a national list:
    Submit your comments by sending an email to tsr@ftc.gov or by writing to the Office of the Secretary, Room 159, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20580. Comments are due to the FTC by April 15, 2002.

    As an aside, Missouri's Attorney General has also gone after the "Miss Cleo" psychic company for its calls to MO residents. Needless to say, I think our Attorney General is doing a pretty good job...even if they're making a mint off of these telemarketers.
    1. Re:Another way to make money off of telemarketers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As an aside, Missouri's Attorney General has also gone after the "Miss Cleo" psychic company for its calls to MO residents."

      can't be very good psychics then, otherwise they'd have realised...

  56. Useful links if you are in the UK by aunitt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you live in the UK here's how to stop unwanted telephone marketing and fax spam, just go to these wonderful web sites and sign up. It really is as simple as that.

    http://www.tps-online.org.uk/

    http://www.fps-online.org.uk/

    These are the links to the telephone preference service and fax preference service.

    Telemarketeers are not allowed to call you by law if you are signed up to these services. And any half decent telemarketeer with respect them (I know that's an oxymoron) otherwise they won't be in business for long.

    1. Re:Useful links if you are in the UK by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

      Is the telemarketer half decent or half filthy?

  57. heh by sinserve · · Score: 4, Funny

    > What's your personal cash-won record?

    Telemarketing his highly profitable. I *can* make 2000 dollars
    a week, working from home, and being my own boss.

    Even a wyoming highschool dropout can do this

    If things go as planned, I will retire at the tender age of 35, married to a russian
    woman, and grow my penis upto 25".

    --

  58. I tried to fight telemarketing... by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1

    and all I got was this stupid t-shirt.

  59. Mmm,machine language code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like an exploit ...instead

  60. Wasting their time is easy by neophase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Answer the phone politely. Determine that it's a telemarketer.
    2. Say "One moment please."
    3. Put the phone down and go about your business for 5-10 minutes.
    4. Pick up the phone, say cheerfully "Hello!", (telemarketer reminds you), say cheerfully "Sorry, of course! Just a sec."
    5. GOTO 3.

    I watched a friend's mother waste someone's time for close to an hour this way...

    --
    ==================================
    neophase
    1. Re:Wasting their time is easy by I.T.R.A.R.K. · · Score: 0
      I got yelled at by doing this..
      He was loud too. I could hear him from my chair to the receiver on the desk, about four feet away..
      "Very funny, asshole!!!"

      It was classic. I was surprised too. He could have been fired for it, had his superiors been monitoring the call.

      --

      "Adequacy.org: Where congenital stupidity is not an option, but a requirement."

    2. Re:Wasting their time is easy by dorsey · · Score: 1

      At my office we routinely follow steps 1-3. However, when we reach step 4, 99% of the telemarketers have already hung up.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
  61. Boring! Try having more fun with 'em :-) by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 3, Funny

    When you know it is a telemarketer, just set the phone next to any of the following for an extended period of time.

    Nahhh.... too easy
    You should piss about with them insted. eg

    Them: Selling double-glassing (very common in UK)
    You: Sorry mate, my house dosnt have any windows (over time, tell em you live in a nuclear bunker or something)

    Them: "I'm carrying out a survay for..."
    You: HAHA.... so am I !!! What are the chances of that!!!

    Just keep 'em on the line and wind them up for as long as possable until they tell you to fuck off and slam the phone down!
    The other alternative is yor very own free porn chatline. Just talk dirty for a bit and see how long it takes 'em to hang up :-)

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
    1. Re:Boring! Try having more fun with 'em :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once kept a telemarketer on the line for an hour while I was playing Arcanun. At the beginning of the call he was so excited and enthusiastic. By the end of the call he sounded extremely depressed, almost suicidal. I bet the longdistance charge for that call came out of his commission. Had a lot of fun with that one.

    2. Re:Boring! Try having more fun with 'em :-) by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

      Start talking softer and softer and softer... The telemarketer will turn up the volume on his/her headset. Then you pull out your airhorn and blow it for about 10 seconds into the phone. If they stay on the line, talk about how you had too much chili last night. Lather, rinse, repeat.

    3. Re:Boring! Try having more fun with 'em :-) by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 1

      I personally have a tactic that in less than two months has all but stopped the telemarketers. When one calls and asks for me buy my first name (I have always gone by my second name, only strangers call me otherwise), my immediate response is, 'he died.'

      It gets all kinds of reactions, but in the end, they stop calling.

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
  62. telemarketer deterrent by GutBomb · · Score: 1

    I tried my hand at telemarketing a few years ago. The first call I made was to an old guy, and I asked to speak with his wife blanche. He proceeded to explain that she had passed away the day before. I started profusely apologizing for disturbing him. he was silent for a few seconds then he started in with wailing laughter and said "don't call me again" and then hung up. I walked out of the office for a smoke break, and never went back. I didn't even cash my $22 paycheck for the paid training. If more people did this they could get rid of telemarketers for good

  63. War-Dialers by rosewood · · Score: 2

    I have been doing work in a lot of Insurance Agency offices and a lot of them have war-dialers. THey start @ 9am CST and stop @ 5pm CST and start @ XXX-0000 and dial to XXX-9999. They generate reports and call back those that get machines at a different time of the day.

    I HATE FUCKERS THAT CALL ME WITH THAT SHIT. It fucking drives me NUTS. Everyone I know hates that automated calling shit.

    One office set it up 2 weeks ago and last week they had 4 appointments based off the calls and 2 new accounts created.

    The other office I know that uses it averages 5 new accounts per month from that machine

    We hate them - yet they are suprisingly effective and cheap to own/use

  64. Yes, but what happens if... by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 2

    ... two month after such a stunt, you hire a new guy whose name happens to be Feynman. The poor rookie will get all those cranky telemarketers' calls...

    --
    Say no to software patents.
    1. Re:Yes, but what happens if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops, should've read the piece to til the end. They actually thought about that issue.

  65. Try $66,000 on for size... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so this guy is obsessed, and the figure is BEFORE attourney fees and non-payments but *dude*....66Gs...

    http://www.click2houston.com/hou/news/akinsarmy/ st ories/akinsarmy-94860320010906-150952.html

    I'm glad i live in texas.

  66. Here's Canada's SPAM laws... by lucky_duck · · Score: 0

    For your info : www.privcom.gc.ca

  67. Yes, there's a US code against this by operagost · · Score: 4, Informative
    US Code 47, sec 227 prohibits the use of automated systems to call residential customers. This includes automatical dialers (you know, the kind where you say 'hello' and it takes the salesperson several seconds to answer) along with recorded messages.

    Unfortunately, most people don't know this, and are buying devices that quietly send a signal that sounds like the 'number disconnected' tone when you pick up the line, just to cut down on the problem. Make the telemarketers shell out the cash, not yourself!

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    1. Re:Yes, there's a US code against this by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      This includes automatical dialers (you know, the kind where you say 'hello' and it takes the salesperson several seconds to answer) along with recorded messages.

      No it doesn't. The rule reads (in relevant part, emphasis mine) "It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States to initiate any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party, unless the call is initiated for emergency purposes or is exempted by rule or order by the Commission under paragraph (2)(B)"

    2. Re:Yes, there's a US code against this by dorsey · · Score: 1
      Yes, it does. The rule reads, word for word (emphasis mine):

      "It shall be unlawful for any person within the United States to make any call (other than a call made for emergency purposes or made with the prior express consent of the called party) using any automatic telephone dialing system or an artificial or prerecorded voice"

      "The term 'automatic telephone dialing system' means equipment which has the capacity to store or produce telephone numbers to be called, using a random or sequential number generator; and to dial such numbers."

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    3. Re:Yes, there's a US code against this by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      You cut out the end of that sentence...

      (i) to any emergency telephone line (including any ''911'' line and any emergency line of a hospital, medical physician or service office, health care facility, poison control center, or fire protection or law enforcement agency);
      (ii) to the telephone line of any guest room or patient room of a hospital, health care facility, elderly home, or similar establishment; or
      (iii) to any telephone number assigned to a paging service, cellular telephone service, specialized mobile radio service, or other radio common carrier service, or any service for which the called party is charged for the call;
    4. Re:Yes, there's a US code against this by dorsey · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I quoted that off an anti-telemarketing webpage, which didn't include that last part...

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
  68. Use your cell phone by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    I always use my cell phone number whenever I give out my number to anyone. In fact, since my non-cell phone belongs to my roomate, I don't really have any other number to give. In any case, while I used to get phone solicitations on a regular basis, I've gotten exactly 3 since I got the cell phone almost a year ago. Yes, I could have sued for $1500 (3x$500), and I may have won, but it wasn't worth it for me, because they stopped.

    It's really nice getting zero telephone solicitations. Unfortunately, I can't sign up for USPS payment services (can't give them a cell phone number, has to be your home number), and had to fudge the truth when I signed up for Netbank (can't give them a cell phone number, so I gave them my efax voice-mail). I probably would have given the USPS my efax voice-mail number, but then they started asking for my SSN and my driver's license number, and I thought that was a little too ridiculous.

  69. Christ! by grytpype · · Score: 2

    There have to be five articles a week on Slashdot about some schlub who got some money from a spammer or telemarketer! Give it a rest already!

    --

    - Have a picture

  70. Do that and we'll call back. by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

    If you participate in that kind of infantile behavoir, telemarketers will put you down as 'not home' and you'll be called again and again and again until you bother to act like an adult.

    Okay, I've been a telemarketer, and let me tell you that the job sucked enough as it was, without clowns like you thinking they where being cute by attempting to screw with us. (There where plenty of people who tried to screw with us, by the way, so the telemarketer you talk to has probably heard it all already.)

    Look, for a while, working as a telemarketer paid the bills pretty well, compared to other jobs you can get as an undergrad student. If you don't want telemarketing calls, just ask to be put on the company's do not call list, which every company must have by law. And be nice to the HUMAN on the other side of the phone. They're just trying to make a living.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    1. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think I speak for all the people just trying to spend a pleasant evening at home when I say,

      We don't care how telemarketers feel.

      They don't mind interupting our evenings, we don't mind being rude in return.

      Especially the auto-dialers!

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    2. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by catfood · · Score: 2
      If you participate in that kind of infantile behavoir, telemarketers will put you down as 'not home' and you'll be called again and again and again until you bother to act like an adult.

      It's infantile to make funny noises when the telemarketer interrupts your life, but it's not infantile to keep calling back where you know you're not wanted?

      Earn your living any way you like, but please don't get all high and mighty when you're going out of your way to annoy people who won't buy your product anyway.

    3. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      They're just trying to make a living.

      Let them make a living doing something more respectable, such as selling crack or turning tricks.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    4. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

      I'm sure your job pisses someone off. Keep that in mind.

      Telemarketers get more than enough positive answers to make the activity profitable, so even if it pisses you off, the next person is just waiting for a call about our wonderful point-back credit card, or whatever it is.

      The means and the end of behaving civily are the same. If you take 30 seconds to be polite and ask to be put on the do not call list, YOU WILL ULTIMATELY REDUCE THE NUMBER OF INTERUPTS in your 'pleasent evening.'

      If you enjoy being an ass to a complete stranger more than you enjoy an uninterupted plesant evening, by all means, go ahead with your infantile behavoir. Otherwise, behave like an adult, and you'll curtail the calls you get.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    5. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turnabout is fair play. The best way to be respected is to act respectful in the first place.

    6. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why is it that the telemarketing jobs pay more than minimum wage for what is essentially mindless work? Perhaps it is because there is a lot of turnover in that job because callers get frustrated doing it. Make the job less attractive and more annoying and they have to pay more to get people to do it. So, by frustrating the callers you can get them to either complain to their bosses, quit and therefore increase the company's turnover, or get more money out of it. Look at the favor we do you, making a minimum wage job pay more. You should thank us for that, although it is certainly not altruistic. Because of it the company's profit margin goes down and makes it less attractive for the company to annoy me with their calls.

      Sure, getting on their "don't call list" may be a more mature way of doing it (and probably a better way as well- I prefer it), but as long as new lists are created and new companies come into business, we are never free. And when the management of the company is insulated from our complaints because the only people we get to talk to are those "just doing their job" and no real input into the company, then getting those callers to stop doing their job is the only way we can affect the management and the company itself.

    7. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      I'm not an ass, I'm not infantile, I'm just firm with them. The rudest I get is to re-iterate "No thank you, please do not call again" and hang up on them.

      Telemarketers are not actually very good about not calling back when I instruct them not to, except for the few times (with repeat offenders) that I've threatened to sue them.

      If you enjoy being an ass to a complete stranger more than you enjoy an uninterupted plesant evening, by all means, go ahead with your infantile behavoir. Otherwise, behave like an adult, and you'll curtail the calls you get.

      Now that you're done being insulting, please explain why a 7:30 pm sales pitch should be treated with the same repesct and courtesy as a call from my mother.

      I think it would be nice to require caller-ID info be available on marketing calls.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    8. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by 1010011010 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One more this. This statement: "behave like an adult, and you'll curtail the calls you get" is absolutely not true.

      I've had much better success being unfriendly and threatening than I have when I've tried to be engaging and nice about it.

      Also, Mr. Offended Telemarketer, telling your target market to "act like adults" is pretty arrogant. Perhaps your industry should try acting like adults, rather that making crank calls for a living.

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    9. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by 1010011010 · · Score: 2

      Your home page sums it up:

      http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    10. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by Pentagram · · Score: 2

      If you participate in that kind of infantile behavoir, telemarketers will put you down as 'not home' and you'll be called again and again and again until you bother to act like an adult.

      And that's adult behaviour?

      Nope, sorry, I'm just bloody-minded. If someone tries to inconvenience me I'm going to try and piss them off as much as possible. Same principle as stopping a cheque if someone is trying to steal from you even if it costs you more to stop it than you would lose otherwise.

      And be nice to the HUMAN on the other side of the phone. They're just trying to make a living.

      Trying to make a living by stealing my time, not by providing a service or creating a product. They're parasites. They contribute as much to society as fleas. And I'll make their job as difficult as possible.

    11. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F*ck off, tele-b*st*rds! I have no respect for worthless sh*thead pukes like you who think my living room is the place for you to conduct business. No I'm not going to "Please put me on your no call list, blah, blah" fifteen times a week. I don't even grunt -- I just hang up. I'm getting on the state's no call list, and then let the PUC rip them a new one when they try calling me again. And if all the braindead jack*sses who encourage these people would get a clue and quit accepting ANYTHING from a solicitation we wouldn't have this problem.

    12. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by TheRealFixer · · Score: 1

      I try to be nice to telemarketers, because I did some telemarketing myself (not to residential homes, only to businesses) and I know how thankless of a job that is. It's horrible. The places are like sweatshops, with hundreds of people in some cases in a big room, being forced to produce, produce, produce. So, generally, I'm nice to them. I say one line, and it usually works: "I'm really not interested, but I appreciate your call." They almost always say, "Ok, thank you for your time," and hang up, with no further question.

      Telemarketers get turned down 235456 times a day, and when someone shows a little bit of kindness, even when turning you down, it goes a long way. It makes me feel good, too, because I know how refreshing that can be to a telemarketer.

      However, lately, I've had the most rude, pushy telemarketers calling me. They try to argue with me when I say I don't want 4 magazines a month, even when I turn them down nicely. THOSE people I have no respect for, and I'll be as rude as I like with them.

      If they get pushy, I'll tell them to hold on a second, and then I'll load up the Arnold soundboard... then at least I get some fun out of it.

    13. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by mdw1962 · · Score: 1

      Wow. Telemarketers who threaten people if they don't behave. I'm gettin' me a freon boat horn for the next call.

    14. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by lizrd · · Score: 1

      Could you have found a less immoral and demeaning way to earn some cash? Honestly, has the market for selling crack to school children dried up completely?

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
    15. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by maxpublic · · Score: 2

      Fuck the telemarketing swine. They called my house; they're intruding on my time and my life without my permission. I don't give a rat's ass that there's a human being on the other end, nor do I need to. As far as I'm concerned, you trespass on my property (and that's what calling my house without permission is, the laws be damned) then you deserve whatever I decide to dish out.

      Hazards of the job, son. Deal with it.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    16. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Getting on the 'don't call' list is pretty suspect itself. Example: My wife was getting telemarketing calls on her cell phone. I asked the lady what company she was calling from, and to please not call a cell phone. She said I had to send that in writing to her before she could put us on that list. Well, if I do that, they now have not only my number, but my address (to probably sell) as well! So I just switched numbers as a cop-out short-term fix.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    17. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Uh, huh. Doesn't work, eh?

      Seems that you stopped telemarketing as soon as you could.

      The more miserable telemarketers there are the harder it is to get people to stay to do the job.

      Besides, making telemarketers as unhappy as they made you is downright cathartic.

      The "I'm just doing it to earn money" thing doesn't fly -- or else drugrunning, assassination, etc. would be kosher as well. Find a way to earn money that doesn't make people unhappy and they won't be mean back.

    18. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats fucking ingenous. I should point out though, that line volume is limited by the telephone equipment, and the telemarketers all have volume controls on their phones.

      So you'll actually be suffering from that horn much more than your supposed victim. Retard.

    19. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Yes, and let's think about who started this little exchange, shall we?

      That's right, the telemarketers.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    20. Re:Do that and we'll call back. by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Why the fuck do we want to make them feel better? The worse we make them feel, the higher, on average, the pay is, and thus the less we get called. This is why the best thing is to get them to swear at you and then demand they get fired.

      Seems like a winning formula to me, at least until someone starts hunting them down and killing them. Now that seems like a great way to raise salaries and price most telemarketers out of business.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  71. Is more on the way? by dsoltesz · · Score: 1

    ZDNet has a article about Interactive Intelligence and Sprint making a deal allowing Interactive to use Sprints' lines for it's new Interactive Voice Response software, which replaces telephone operators with a computer to make (or take) phone calls to people -- one application of the software is telemarketing.

  72. MAKE MONEY FA$$$T!!!! by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2


    Here's how! Get your name and number on everyone's telemarketing list, and then sue them when they call.

    For more information, send your (certified) check for $500 to [ADDRESS CENSORED]!!!!

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  73. We need a do not spam list by glsunder · · Score: 1

    It'd be nice if the government would pass a law where any one could put their email on a national list and if you get spammed, the spammer would owe you $500. I could make a fortune off of my hotmail account alone -- about $20K a week or more.

  74. "DO NOT CALL" -NYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know if this was mentioned before but New York State has a "Do not call" telemarketing registry website @ www.consumer.state.ny.us

    My co-worker told me about it and I signed up. I takes a few months to take affect, but there shouldn't be any more telemarketing calls afterwards. Worth looking into if you're in NY.

    1. Re:"DO NOT CALL" -NYS by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Pennsylvania just passed a similar law. It'll take 90 days to go into law. Strangely if you are under 60 the fine is 1000 dollars, if youa re over that age and they call you, it's 3 grand.

  75. I bought one... by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    ...for my mother at X-mas. It emits a tone everytime the line is picked up. Last I heard, the number of crap calls had noticeably dropped. I don't know if telemarketers will be able to work around it either. They'd be fools to not program their auto-dialers to listen for those tones and remove the "bad" numbers from their list. Someone will probably think of something though.

  76. ugh. by macsox · · Score: 2

    um, any way to to block stories from the 'please-kiss-this-man' department? it's not really my lifestyle choice.

  77. Being a little harsh? by WaxParadigm · · Score: 1

    My opinion is probably not popular...so flame me or whatever, I still think I have something important to say:

    I know I hate the telemarketers who call me at the wrong times (stock brokers at 7AM), but there are some very-legitimate businesses out there who do a good job of targeting their audience.

    I have a friend with such a business, employing about 20 telemarketers. They know about what they are selling. They only sell stuff they know the business is already using, and their first call or two is never to sell, just to get a quote out.

    They are almost always cheaper than the current supplier, and when they are not, they make their best effort to be.

    I hate it when people lump all telemarketers into one big lump. These people are polite, will understand if you actually don't use the product (hence they can't save you $$), and the company only makes money by selling a lot of volume at small margins. They don't make money by ripping people off, rather they save them money.

    My father recently saved mega dollars remodeling his duplex because someone called up selling windows and had a better deal thanmy dad could find elsewhere. I'm sure if my dad said "I don't need any windows", they (being a responsible company) would have understood.

    How are these legitimate businesses (not scams, traps, overly-persistant) supposed to contact their customers if they can't call. It's far too expensive to mail out mailers (and that wastes trees anyway).

    There are legit companies, saving you and me money, and insuring there is compeition in the marketplace (something I think all /.ers understand necessary for consumers). Please don't lump everyone into one bag. It's just like generalizing about any other group of people "all managers are dumb", etc...when we know that just isn't true.

    If they are trying to scam you, hang up...don't put up this call blocking crap that only serves to reduce competition in the marketplace and hurt many small businesses who are not out to scam you, but make an honest buck.

    --

    Any spelling errors are because I don't care

    1. Re:Being a little harsh? by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      I have a friend with such a business, employing about 20 telemarketers.

      Your disreputable social circle isn't my concern.

      How are these legitimate businesses (not scams, traps, overly-persistant) supposed to contact their customers if they can't call.

      I've heard of these things called "advertisements" and "Web pages". These bleeding-edge innovations should be covered on /. any day now.

      there are some very-legitimate businesses out there who do a good job of targeting their audience
      It's far too expensive to mail out mailers (and that wastes trees anyway).

      One or the other. Either they narrowly target their audience (in which case it isn't unduly expensive to use the mail) or they blast it out randomly (in which case it's proper to lump them in with the general mass of telephone pests).

      If they are trying to scam you, hang up...don't put up this call blocking crap that only serves to reduce competition in the marketplace and hurt many small businesses who are not out to scam you, but make an honest buck.

      As long as I am paying for my phone line, I'll put whatever "call blocking crap" I please on it. Any business of whatever size that tries to slip through it shall be considered to be attempting to scam me for a dishonest buck.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  78. Californians Against Telephone Solicitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.stopjunkcalls.com/

    Great page on HOWTO make money from junk calls and junk faxes!

  79. KA9Q: Revenge On A Telemarketing Scam by edesio · · Score: 1

    If you have time to implement, Phil Karn (KA9Q) has a wonderful way to get some goods from telemarketing firms here.

    Have fun,

    Edésio

  80. make money... by pamri · · Score: 1

    .the homer simpson way Favourite Qoute:"Hello, this is Homer Simpson, a.k.a. Happy Dude. The court has ordered me to call every person in town to apologize for my telemarketing scam. I'm sorry. If you can find it in your heart to forgive me, send one dollar to Sorry Dude, 742 Evergreen Terrace, Springfield. You have the power."

  81. Irony by freeweed · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone else find it extremely funny that someone called 'prisoner' also works for the RIAA? :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Irony by jred · · Score: 1

      I didn't even notice it until you pointed it out. That's a good one, though :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
  82. Karma whore alert 1 and 2 PartyRecording Laws by anastus · · Score: 1

    http://www.pimall.com/nais/n.tel.tape.law.html#anc hor373433

    Damn, guess I'll have warn the telemarketers, since I'm in Florida.

    --
    Calvin:"It takes an uncommon mind to think of these things Hobbes" Hobbes: "I'm afraid I'd have to agree with that."
  83. Really fighting telemarketers by airship · · Score: 1

    Try this tactic instead:
    1. Act really, really enthused about the product.
    2. Say "This sounds like the total solution we've been looking for. I think we need a face-to-face."
    3. Ask them to fly someone out to give a presentation. Better, ask them to send a team out to give a presentation.
    4. When they get there, make them take you out to dinner and drinks the night before the presentation.
    5. After 5 minutes of the presentation, say "This isn't at all what we need. It sounded completely different on the phone. Goodbye!"
    The company is out thousands of dollars and a couple of days of lost time.
    Repeat every time you get a telemarketing call. Even if they call you at home for a magazine subscription. "Say, this sounds like a valuable resource for our business. I think all 10,000 of our employees could use this magazine! Can you send a rep out to give a presenatation to our staff?"
    If everyone in America would do this for a month, telemarketers would be bankrupt in a month.
    Oh, yeah, and never, ever buy anything from a telemarketer. Not even if they offer you solid gold bricks for a penny. It just encourages them.

    --
    Serving your airship needs since 1995.
  84. Don't waste $50 on the "telezapper"... by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    One of our local TV stations did a feature on it. They determined that it doesn't work very well at all.
    Article is here

  85. I sue telemarketers, Here is my standard complaint by BuckMulligan · · Score: 1
    Hello /. people,
    I sue telemarketers regularly. I live in Washington, DC and sue in the DC small claims court. It only costs $15 to file, and thus far I have collected $600 this year.


    Here is the language I put in my standard complaint against someone who has sent an unsolicited commercial fax message:



    On March 15, 2002, the Defendant sent an unsolicited commercial facsimile message to Plaintiff's home telephone number in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (47 U.S.C. 227 (b)(1)(C)). Additionally, the fax message did not include accurate date, time, and sending telephone number information in the margin of the message in violation of 47 U.S.C. 227 (d)(1)(B). Plaintiff has no prior business relationship with defendant, and has not consented to such communications. The TCPA affords Plaintiff a private right of action in State court pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 227 (b)(3). The Superior Court of the District of Columbia (Civil Division-Small Claims and Conciliation Branch) has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to D.C. 11-921 and D.C. 11-1321. Defendant is engaged in willing or knowing violations of the TCPA, and Plaintiff requests minimum liquidated damages of $500 and treble damages pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 227 (b)(3)(C).

  86. Keep on suin' by jestapher · · Score: 1

    I've been getting a flood of hits and email since yesterday when that PI article turned into a piece on KING 5 TV here in Seattle and, obviously, this Slashdot piece. When it rains, it pours. :)

    I've won $7150 in small claims court. I've collected $2650, of which $1800 was from pre-trial settlements.

    I've been doing this for about a year and I'd estimate I spend about twelve hours a month doing it. That works out to ~$18 per hour, which isn't too shabby in this economy. If you actually enjoy doing this sort of thing, it's that much better.

    This hobby keeps getting more interesting every day. Two weeks ago I was contacted by an assistant attorney general in Arizona about one of my cases. They wanted to "compare notes." That same week, a police detective from Oregon contacted me, wanting to "share" information. It seems that these people might not have jurisdiction over the spammers (who violate more than Washington law when they hijack mail servers), so they're really rooting for me. The Oregon detective said he was hoping to come to my court case!

    All in all, this is good fun and you get a warm fuzzy feeling knowing what slimebags most of these people are. Junk faxes and recorded calls are illegal under federal law as well as many state laws, so anyone can go after those folks and, if you enjoy playing detective at all, you really should.

  87. Faxes are the worse! by UnifiedTechs · · Score: 2

    My problem is worse then spam and soliciters, it's faxes. The kicker is I don't even have a fax machine. I finally borrowed one from a friend so I could get the number to call back and cancel but it takes time, and fax spamers don't seem to care what time it is, I get calls at 2am with no regard for the fact I am sleeping.

    Most of them marketing faxes, some are from large companies who say they can't figure out were the fax is comming from (I haven't gotten any since my last call so I hope they figured it out), one is from the Nigeria scam. This is crazy, there needs to be a law regarding caller ID on faxes, If I hadn't borrowed a fax machine I would still be unable to call them. It's illigal to fax unsolicited, but I have to pay for the fax machine to find out who it is?

    I would change phone numbers but I've had this one for about 6 months now, at first it was not bad but it got 100 times worse since then. Based on some of the faxes I am quessing my number used to belong to a realestate agency.

  88. What about Canada? by derfla8 · · Score: 1

    Does anybody have URLs or information in regards to laws against unsolicited fax and email? And how to take similiar cases to small claims court?

  89. Don't be mad at Eichman... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...He was just doing what he was ordered.

    You have a conscience, don't you? You have free will?

    Telemarketing companies are evil, and everyone that works for them are evil.

    "Hey don't be mad at us drug dealers, we are just trying to make a living, be mad at the cartels."

    1. Re:Don't be mad at Eichman... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'd rather be a drug dealer than a telemarketer. There are lots of nice, honest drug dealers who don't bother anyone. Sometimes they bother you walking down the street, but that's a damned sight better than calling you at home when you're trying to sleep.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  90. Putting liens on bank accounts costs $$$... by aquarian · · Score: 2

    Collecting money is not that easy, and not that cheap. I had a service business for many years, and had to deal with a lot of deadbeats. Getting judgements was not the problem. Collecting the money was. Even if you already have the bank account info, and even if there's money in it, it costs a lot to collect it. At the very least, you have to get an abstract of judgement, then there's a fee to file the lien. Last time I did this, the courthouse fees alone were almost $200. On top of that, there's another fee to actually get the money from the offender's account. You have to pay this up front- the marshalls won't just take a commission, like lawyers will.

    1. Re:Putting liens on bank accounts costs $$$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the judgement holders have to pay the costs you incur while getting your money.

    2. Re:Putting liens on bank accounts costs $$$... by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative
      You can always just turn it over to a collection agency. I don't know exactly how that works, but I think they just take a percentage.

      And they have all the right connections and lawyers to get the money. About the only time it doesn't work is when you aren't exactly sure who the person is, as is the case with some spammers.

      But if they have an actual business, instead of just calling themselves one, it should work.

      And I don't think it costs very much if they don't get the money. Certainly less than it would cost you wasting time looking for them, and they have a lot more resources and know the laws.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:Putting liens on bank accounts costs $$$... by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Someone is laughing at me. I receieved in email a few hours after I posted this a message from a place saying I should become a 'Professional Business Debt Negotiator'. This appears to be the samer thing as a credit consuler except you charge money from someone, and, of course, you ahve to pay 249 dollars for training.


      This is somewhat the flip side of collection agencies.


      Names and phone number posted to finger the guilty.


      Someone with free longdistance call these people up and tell them what you think of spam:


      ---

      NATIONAL DEBT ARBITRATION CORPORATION

      1 - 314 - 414 - 0238


      We have support staff available to you from 7:00am to 9:00pm (Mountain Time) 7 days a week.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  91. Re:Destroying the spamming industry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah fighting spam should be done the same way: if the SMTP server identifies a spammer (or open relay check or whatever), it should just tarpit the connection for as long as it can
    I'd be willing to waste some of my bandwidth dealing with my part if everyone did like this, making spammers take minutes or hours just to send one message

  92. I solved the problem with telemarkers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I removed my phone line. It's great!!! No interruptions.

    My personal email only accepts known emails (no spam) as well.

    Now if I can only get rid of my mail box. I tried removing it, they just place the mail on my doorstep. I'm thinking about putting out another trashcan with my mailing address on it. :)

  93. If you really want to punish the guy on the phone- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -just hang up.

    Take a listen to this from "This American Life" here:

    http://www.thislife.org/

    Click on the 02 archive and scroll down to the February 1 episode, "Plan B," and listen to "Act Four: A Fate Most of Us Fear" (requires RealAudio). It's one particular guy's telemarketing experience.

    The MOST beneficial thing you can do for the poor schlubs in a telephone boiler room is to do ANYTHING out of the ordinary which keeps them on the phone longer than the 30 seconds or so that they are allowed to give their initial pitch. If you keep them on line then that gives the phoners a break from having to give their pitch again (and again and...). This also explains why they are more than willing to go along with almost any nonsense (short of ear damage and pure obnoxiousness) for minutes at a time.

    ...and, no, I did not listen to it again to see if you can skip to Act Four: once was quite enough for me, thank you!

  94. Telemarketers suck. by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    I know I'm just preaching to the choir here, but...

    Telemarketing should be outlawed. Seriously. All it does is annoy people and invade their privacy, and for what? So someone can get an easy paycheck? Come on. Get off your you-know-what, find a real job, and stop supporting an industry that does NOTHING but piss people off.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  95. Don't feel sorry for them. by eatenn · · Score: 1
    I've been browsing through this thread and I've come across a few comments that I object to. First of all, there are a couple instances of people arguing that "telemarketers are just doing their jobs."

    Well, guess what? Rejection and dealing with rude customers is part of that job. If you want to be ignorant to telemarketers, feel free. It comes with the territory.

    Next, I've read a couple posts suggesting we should be sympathetic due to the poor, unfortunate telemarketer's working conditions. A few months ago, I had an interview at a company called "DirecTel." They offered me a job, I accepted. The pay rate was $10/hr. No prior experience was necessary, and I got free dental (wooha!). I took the week of training, which consisted mostly of teaching me how to manipulate customers, how to place people into well defined 2-dimensional categories, and also how to ignore that constant moral nagging due to the fact that I was getting paid to annoy people. Anyways, I quit the job before I ever had to make a call, and paid my rent with the money I made during that first week of training. I ended up costing them money, which made me feel good about myself, even though DirecTel probably didn't give the slightest shit.

    Most of my time during that week of training was spent taking people OFF the telemarketing lists while no one was watching, but one time, our slimy little supervisor/trainer guy took us out of the training room, and upstairs to see the place where all the magic happens. People were wearing expensive clothes, laughing with each other, standing and talking and genuinally seeming to enjoy themselves.

    Certainly this is probably not the situation at all telemarketing companies, but I can say that the only part of the job that seemed especially UNAPPEALING to me was the fact that I had to annoy people to make a living.

    Last thing (I promise)... the aforementioned slimy little supervisor/trainer person once told me that we were offering legitimate products to legitimate consumers, and that we shouldn't feel bad about our jobs as salespeople. The difference between a telemarketer and "Joe Smallbusiness" who owns a store in the local mall is that telemarketers make targets on (potentially) unwilling consumers. They're not out shopping, they're not looking through catalogues, they're in their homes.

    At home... not at the marketplace.

    --
    "But the cars are all flashing me, bright lights are passing me, I feel life passing me by" - Stiff Little Fingers
  96. please remove by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if this is state or federal law, but if you ask them to remove you from their list, I think legally they're required to. My norm when I realise a telemarketer has called is "Please remove me from your list""click"

    I never get callbacks *shrug*

  97. Simple Solution and you don't have to sue by Satanboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Put your phone number in a newspaper, make it cheap, do it once and advertise you will "rate the telemarketers expertise for $1000 a call"

    Simply answer the phone, get the pitch, request the address and phone number of the company.

    Then, mail them a bill.

    Once the bill is mailed, wait two weeks and file a lawsuit suing the company for not meeting a contractual agreement. Keep a copy of the ad handy and you will win in court.

    I actually heard about a friend who did this and won. He did it quite often, he got quite a bit of money the first year. Now, he rarely ever gets calls.

    Might be worth a try.

    1. Re:Simple Solution and you don't have to sue by Satanboy · · Score: 1

      ooops
      guess I should have mentioned that you do sue, but not over shakey telemarketing laws, but over real honest to goodness business laws.

      >:-o

  98. Yeah! by rs79 · · Score: 1

    I've had 7 calls in 6 days about carpet cleaning. No I don't want to take any damn survey thank you and will you please take my name off your list. They say they will and then call back the next day. It's always a different voice.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  99. Ahem by evilviper · · Score: 2

    Larry Parker got me, 2.1 Million....

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  100. Message from Dancin_Santa@hotmail.com by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

    I keep getting more and more spam by posting here on Slashdot. I don't know why. It's quite annoying.

    Dancin Santa
    Dancin_Santa@hotmail.com

  101. Irony (their website was featured in the article) by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know, the company might actually be happy about the whole thing.

    Many people read their website name in that article.

    Sometimes even negative publicity is good publicity. Unfortunate but true, they are likely to get some sales as a result of that.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  102. not so strange... by Linuxthess · · Score: 1
    Telemarketers are notorious for taking advantage of elderly people, because as a general rule they are more easily intimidated into making purchases they really do not want.

    More so if they are senile or just bordering on it, they can really be taken for all their worth and more.

    Pretty unscruplous and low for the average person, but not for telemarketers. Ohhh, and electronic salesmen.
    So I can understand the logic behind the law, because this will intimidate the telemarketer to be more careful, and not so wily afterall.

    --

    I sig, therefore I was.
  103. Cancel your home phone by thilmony · · Score: 1

    I was paying $25-30 a month for my basic phone service, with call waiting.

    I was getting a lot of telemarketers. I bought the no solication for $5, which required caller ID for $8, and the $30 box.

    Well later I found out Qwest's custom choice is only $50 a month, and I can forward my phone and get other features too.

    So after a few months of $50 a month, I said the heck with it. I still get telemarketing calls anyway.

    Cancelled the home phone last week (the wire gets cut Friday). My wife and I have cell phones and that will be plenty for me thank you.

    --
    YES, there is a McDonald's in Hanoi Square.
  104. Any pointers to european law? by fr2ty · · Score: 1


    I'd be glad if anyone could send me (solicited) information
    about german law on that subject?
    fr2ty@freemail.hu
    th@nkj.hu!