Slashdot Mirror


Viruses: More Hype than Danger?

blankmange writes "CNN is carrying a story on how the big virus scares within the last year or so have been just that: scares, usually hyped by the media with software companies standing by to reap the profits. 'The market for computer security is booming as PC users become more aware of the need to protect themselves from worms and viruses. "Code Red" hit the headlines in July last year, with dire predictions that the PC worm would cripple the Internet. Yet in the end, Code Red didn't even make the year's virus Top 10.' PDAs are the next marketing target, along with cellphones."

419 comments

  1. Romanian Communist Party by K0R$+h4x0r+ru1z · · Score: -1


    Letter of the CC of the Romanian Communist Party Proposing the Improvement of the Warsaw Treaty Organization and the Democratization of its activity

    We make these propositions having in mind the changes going on in the international arena and the special emphasis placed by the socialist countries on the problems of disarmament, détente and cooperation in Europe and the whole world, and on the problems of creating conditions under which it may be possible to achieve the simultaneous disbandment of NATO and the Warsaw Pact. We believe it necessary that at its forthcoming meeting, the Political Consultative Committee discuss and adopt a number of measures for the reconstruction and improvement of the leadership of the Warsaw Pact.

    The Central Committee of the Romanian Communist Party makes the assessment that the current way of working in the PCC of the Warsaw pact member-states is one-sided; it is directed primarily towards the military problems, and the impression is created that the concerns of the leadership of our parties and countries are connected exclusively with these problems and have a predominantly military character.

    Based on this analysis, the RCP CC wishes to consult with you on the following proposals, which it intends to put forward at the forthcoming meeting in Warsaw.

    The restructuring of the Warsaw Pact PCC in view of the withdrawal from the direction, followed until now, towards military problems; and that a PCC of the European socialist countries that is not linked to the Warsaw Pact - which has purely military aims - but ensures multilateral cooperation of our parties and states in the political and military spheres be established... The PCC should direct its activity primarily toward the appraisal and discussion of substantive issues of the construction of socialism in our countries and their interaction, socio-economic development and the enhancement of the standard of living of our peoples, the strengthening of socialist democracy, forces of peace and socialism as a whole, and in this respect, toward ensuring the defensive capability of the socialist countries;

    A Military Defense Committee to be set up as a military organ to the Treaty, composed of defense ministers from each member-state who will be obliged to report to the government and the Supreme Command of the respective country.

  2. The Day Katz Had His Way With Me by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    When I was younger, I used to visit my uncle, who had a farm. I
    remember once when I was about sixteen I was spending a few weeks in
    the summer there.

    My uncle had a man there named Aboab, who worked around the place and
    generally helped out. One day I was walking out by the stables and
    saw Aboab watching the horses. One of the horses, a beautiful dark
    brown stallion, kept biting another hors on the back of the neck.
    "Aboab," I said, "What is he doing?"

    Aboab looked shy for a moment, and, blushing, said "Dat's how horses
    court, missey."

    This intrigued my curiosity. Looking closer, I could see the
    stallion's member hanging down almost to the ground. I was astonished
    at the size of it. Soon the other horse presented herself, and the
    great, brown stallion mounted her. My cheeks were hot with
    embarrasment, but I couldn't take my eyes off it. I became aware of
    Aboab standing close to me, watching the huge beasts. "Missey, you
    ever seen people do it?"

    "No," I mumbled, "of course not."

    "Yo uncle does it every moanin wit de girl dat milks de cows. Would
    you like to see it?"

    This intrigued and excited me. Before I knew it, I found that I had
    agreed to meet Aboab in the barn early the next morning to witness
    this with my own eyes.

    * * *

    The next day I awoke just as the sun was coming up. I was soon out of
    bed and dressed, and headed for the barn. I didn't like what I was
    doing, and felt ashamed of myself, but I couldn't help myself.

    Aboab met me at the barn and took me into the hay loft. He placed us
    on the hay where we could look down onto the main floor, and spread
    some hay over us to hide us.

    Soon Inga came in to milk the cows. SHortly after she arrived my
    uncle walked in and said, "Inga, my dear! There you are! I've
    something here that has been waiting all night for you!" With that,
    he pulled down his pants. I was immediatly reminded of the stallion I
    had seen in action the day before, so large was his tool. Inga knelt
    before him and began stroking and kissing his manhood, cooing over it.
    She placed it in her mouth and began to suck on it.

    As I watched her working on my uncle's member, I became aware that
    Aboab had moved, and was now laying on top of me. I could feel his
    bulge pressing against the crack of my behind. He began working his
    tool against my skirt. I couldn't tell him to stop, because I didn't
    want my uncle to discover us spying on him. Besides, the spectacle
    below us was making me more and more excited.

    Inga suddenly jumped up and said, "Sir, if I do not have you in me
    this minute, I shall scream!" My uncle then laid her down on a table
    and pulled up her skirts. I got an excellent view of her mature
    cunny, much hairier than my own. Then my uncle buried his cock inside
    of her, and began to pump it in and out of her. From the angle I was
    at I had an excellent view of my uncle's huge prick plunging deep into
    her.

    The sight of my uncle screwing Inga excited Aboab immensly. He soon
    pulled my skirt up over my behind, and before I knew it his tool
    plunged deep into my cunny. This was not the first time I had felt a
    man inside of me, but my splendid view of my uncle and Inga made it
    very special. Aboab started groaning softly as he humped me from
    behind, matching his strokes to those of my uncle. It was all I could
    do to keep from crying out as I felt his cock moving inside of me. My
    mind was filled with the sight of my uncle's huge prick at work, and I
    couldn't help but think of how that massive tool would feel. I
    imagined that monstrous member prodding me as Aboab worked at my
    pussy, and it was all I could do to keep from crying out.

    Soon I felt Aboab pulsing inside of me, and he stiffened and pressed
    his body against mine, plunging his tool deep into me. But my uncle
    was still working on Inga, and I heard her whimpering and saw her
    thrashing as she came and came. My uncle seemed tireless. Still he
    pounded away at her. Aboab had collapsed on top of me, and was
    kissing my neck and whispering in my ear. But all I could see was
    that Inga was still being fucked, still coming.

    Then, finally, my uncle stiffened against her and sighed out loud. He
    pulled away from her, and I saw his thick white cream oozing from her
    notch, even as I felt Aboab's running from my own.

    His organ was shriveled now, a pale ghost of its former self, and yet
    still bigger than Aboab's at its hardest. I gazed longingly at it,
    and knew that I would not be happy until I had felt it within me.

    Aboab and I remained in hiding until my uncle and Inga had departed.
    As we waited Aboab fondled my tits and my cunny, admiring my
    tightness. By the time they were both gone, Aboab was ready for
    action again. This time I took him laying on my back, feeling the
    hard thrust of his cock within me. Having just spent himself in me,
    he lasted much longer this time, and his juices lubricated me so that
    we slid in and out of me in a most agreeable fashion. But it was
    still the thought of that massive organ that made me come. I imagined
    it stretching my cunny, filling me with its juice, as Aboab forced
    himself deep inside of me.

    Aboab and I lay for awhile in the hay, touching and stroking one
    another, as I tried to imagine how I could possibly get that massive
    tool.

    * * *

    My uncle had a section of apple trees on his farm. He had a sort of a
    field hand named Nadav who was mainly responsible for taking care of
    the apple trees. Nadav had always intrigued me, because I had often
    seen him in profile, and he seemed quite well equipped in the nether
    regions.

    One day I went out to the apple orchard and told Nadav that I wished
    to pick a few apples if I could find any which were ripe. He picked
    up a ladder and took me out into the orchard, and set the ladder
    against a tree for me. I climbed up the ladder, basket in hand,
    leaving Nadav to steady the ladder for me. I had taken care to leave
    off my undergarments that day, and I made sure to lean out from the
    ladder, holding my legs open so that Nadav could see up my skirts. I
    could tell that I had his full attention whenever I reached for a
    distant apple, as I made sure to do quite often.

    After teasing him thus for a bit, I decided that it was time to be a
    bit more direct. I dropped my basket of apples to him, and told him
    that I was coming down. As I got near the ground, I contrived to slip
    on the ladder, and landed on him with my legs over his shoulders and
    his head under my skirts. I felt him give my cunny a quick kiss
    before he lowered me to the ground, looking quite embarrased.

    "Nadav," I said, "I'm feeling quite faint. Would you help me to the
    gardening shed?"

    He eagerly agreed, and took me to the shed nearby, there laying me
    down on a rude cot that was inside. I felt him stroking my legs as I
    pretended to be faint with exhaustion. "Are you all right, ma'am?" he
    asked.

    "Oh, yes," I replied, "I just need to catch my breath." His hands
    continued to stroke my legs, and slowly edged there way upwards.
    "What are you doing, Nadav? You must stop this instant, or I shall be
    forced to tell my uncle!"

    "Oh, but ma'am," he replied, "I can't help it! You're so lovely, and
    your skin is so smooth and soft!"

    "I really must insist," I said, "you really must stop. This isn't at
    all proper."

    "Oh, but ma'am, I can't help myself!" His hands worked slowly
    upwards, and began to softly stroke the hair on my cunny.

    "But you must! This isn't right. If my uncle found out, we'd both be
    in trouble. You must stop right away. Oh, yes, that's the spot," I
    said, as he found my love button.

    He continued to stroke my mound for awhile, then he said, "Oh, ma'am,
    I can't help it!" With that, he shoved his head under my skirt and
    began licking and kissing my cunny.

    "Well," I said, "if you must, you must." I reached down and unbuckled
    his pants, which fell to the floor to reveal his throbbing manhood.
    In a flash, he was on top of me, kissing my throat and squeezing my
    tits. I felt his throbbing tool rubbing against my portal, and soon
    managed to place the tip of his prong against my love canal. He
    wasted no time in shoving himself deep into me.

    His large cock felt wonderful sliding in and out of me. He humped me
    furiously for a few minutes, but all too soon I felt him stiffen
    against me, shoving his cock as far into me as he could. And then I
    felt his juices pulse into me, and knew it was over, all too soon.
    His equipment was the size of my uncle's, but his endurance was sadly
    lacking.

    As he crooned over me and whispered into my ear, I sadly realized that
    I would not be satisfied until I had felt the full strength and power
    of my uncle's tool.

    I also realized, laying there on the cot with Nadav on top of me, that
    if I was going to find my pleasure among the help, then I'd be much
    better off staying with Aboab.

    * * *

    While I was at my uncle's I noticed that one of the serving girls,
    Maryann, would disappear shortly after dinner almost every night. My
    uncle would then declare that he was going for a walk to smoke a cigar
    (my aunt disapproved of his cigars, and would not let him smoke them
    in the house).

    One night I was determined to find out exactly what happened on these
    walks. Shortly after my uncle left on his evening constitutional, I
    arose from the table, stating that I was full and did not desire any
    dessert, and quietly left the house through the back door. I soon
    spotted the glow of my uncle's cigar in the back garden.

    I slipped quietly into the garden and hid behind a large boxbush.
    Soon I saw Maryann join my uncle in the center of the garden.

    "There you are, my sweet!" my uncle whispered hoarsely. "I've been
    waiting for you. I've been looking forward to this for quite awhile,
    now!"

    "I'm sure you have, sir", she replied. "And did you see me blush when
    you squeezed my buns during dinner?"

    "Yes, I did", he answered. "But don't worry. I don't think Nora
    noticed."

    "Well now you can squeeze them to your heart's content!" With that,
    he put his arms around her and pressed her tightly to him, kissing her
    soundly. I could see quite clearly in the pale moonlight, and felt my
    body shiver in anticipation as I saw my uncle pull up her skirt and
    squeeze her firm bottom. Maryann was no laggard, either, and soon had
    worked his pants open so that she could take his massive tool in her
    hands. I watched with envy as she pulled it and stroked it. "Oh,
    sir!" she cried, "I cannot stand it! I must have it!" She dropped to
    her knees and took the end of his giant member into her mouth. So
    large was it that she could do no more than suck the head of it, which
    she did with wild abandon.

    "Oh, my darling Maryann", he cried, "if you do that much more, you
    will drown in my cum! I must have you right now!"

    She reluctantly drew her head away from his manhood and lay back on
    the grass, pulling him on top of her. Soon he was pounding his tool
    into her with great energy, causing her to moan with joy. I could not
    help myself.

    Soon I was frantically frigging myself with my finger. The wan
    moonlight was not enough to let me see the detail that I longed to
    feel deep inside myself, but my imagination was more than equal to the
    task.

    Maryann began to thrash and cry out, until I was certain that my aunt
    Nora must certainly step outside to see what was happening. This
    added to my sense of excitement, until it was all I could do to keep
    from crying out myself and betraying my presence to my uncle.

    I was entranced by the sight of my uncle's buttocks rising and
    falling, glowing whitely in the dim light, a second moon reflecting
    the one in the sky, but bouncing, thrusting, plunging into the lovely
    serving girl's cunny. My own cunny throbbed and pulsed in sympathy.
    My hand was drenched in my own juices, even though I knew that my
    finger was but a pale shadow of my uncle's manhood.

    Finally, after a seeming eternity of hot sweaty flesh slapping
    together in ecstasy, I saw my uncle stiffen, plunging himself deep
    into Maryann's pussy, and heard him grunt with pleasure. I knew that
    he had shot his load deep into her, and wondered how it would feel to
    be filled by such a tool as his. I quickly and quietly faded back
    into the bushes, so as not to be caught.

    * * *

    Maryann's room had a connecting door with the one I slept in. That
    night I went to the door and asked Maryann if she would mind talking
    with me a bit. She readily agreed, and we were soon curled up on her
    bed chatting away.

    As talk among girls will do, we were soon discussing men. She told me
    a great deal about the various men she had been with at one time or
    another. I wistfully stated that I hadn't even been so close as to
    see a cunny that had had a man. She replied that it looked no
    different than any other cunny, so I challenged her to prove it.
    Before she quite knew what was happening, I had my head under her
    nightgown and was examining her pussy. "Well," I said, "it certainly
    has a lot more hair than mine."

    "Oh, pooh!", she exclaimed, "that just comes with time. Your's will
    have as much hair as mine, soon enough."

    "I think it might smell a bit different, as well", I stated. "I wonder
    how it would taste?" With that, I reached out with my tongue and
    gently licked her.

    "You shouldn't do that", she stated, but she didn't draw away. In
    fact, her legs moved further apart, as if to give me more room.

    Soon I was laid out on my stomach, my head in her lap, giving all my
    attention to her luscious hairy womanhood. It had a strong musky
    taste, and seemed to respond warmly to my ministrations. Soon Maryann
    was moving her hips and cooing with pleasure. I continued to lick her
    private parts, savoring the strong, spicy taste, until suddenly she
    arched her back and I felt a warm gush of liquid which I eagerly
    lapped up.

    "That was heavenly", she murmured, stroking my hair. "Tell me,
    precious, what can I possibly do for you in return?"

    "Well", I replied, "there is one small thing you could do. . ."

    * * *

    The next evening as we were finishing dinner, my uncle arose for his
    evening walk in the garden. As soon as he was gone, I got up, stating
    that I was quite full and did not care for dessert. I slipped out the
    side door and worked my way around to the garden. The moon had not
    risen yet, and it was quite dark.

    I felt my way along the paths, and soon found the open area in the
    center of the garden. I saw a red glow from the end of my uncle's
    cigar, and sidled up to him warmly. He put his arms around me and
    hugged me close to him, telling me softly of all the things he was
    planning to do to me.

    "Why, Maryann", he whispered, "you're awfully quiet tonight. Are you
    sure you want to be here?"

    I murmured quietly in his ear, and pressed my body against him,
    rubbing my crotch against the bulge in his pants. He appeared
    satisfied with that as an answer, and soon I felt his rough hands
    under my skirt, stroking the cheeks of my ass. As Maryann had advised
    me, I was not wearing any underwear, and soon his hands had found my
    tender cunny. He seemed confused for a moment at the sparse hair on
    my mound, so I decided to divert his attention. Holding my arms
    firmly around his waist, I leaned back and drew him on top of me on
    the ground.

    I kissed him fervently, and soon whatever thoughts he had disappeared
    as he rubbed himself against me. My hands frantically unzipped his
    trousers, and soon I could feel his gigantic tool brushing against me.
    I shivered at the thought of what was to come. My juices sprang forth
    in anticipation, and soon I felt the head of his huge rod pressing
    against my portal. He grunted with effort as he pressed himself into
    me, filling me until I thought I would burst. "Oh", he murmured, "oh,
    oh, Maryann, whatever you've been doing, I swear you're tighter than
    ever!"

    Then he began to move his hips, and my world was full with the feeling
    of his giant root sliding in and out of me. It was all that I had
    imagined, and more. He quickened his pace, and my cunny exploded with
    fire and ice as I felt his member thrusting into me. I felt as if I
    was a melon that was about to burst. I felt as if he was going to
    split me in two. Such was the power of his massive rod shoving into
    me.

    It seemed to go on forever. I can feel to this day the glorious
    feeling of his marvelous tool stretching my soft tissues and
    penetrating deeper into me than any other man has ever done. My
    entire world consisted of nothing but a giant cock thrusting against
    yeilding flesh.

    Finally, when it seemed that I could endure no more, I felt his
    wonderful prick plunge deeper into me than ever before, as if he was
    forcing it into me with all the power at his command. Then I felt a
    marvelous sensation, exploding my cunt into shards of ecstasy, as his
    giant tool began to pulse and throb, shooting hot jets of his cum deep
    into me. On and on it went, filling every crevice of my body with his
    sperm. I wrapped my legs around him and pulled him to me, glorying in
    the feeling of his hot cum filling me.

    I felt as if I was adrift in a sea of cum. Slowly he climbed off of
    me. Regretfully I followed, climbing unsteadily to my feet. I kissed
    him soundly, and watched as he drifted off back to the house. After a
    bit, I followed and retired to my room, glorying in the warm feeling
    radiating from my cunny, and the gentle tickle as his hot sperm
    overflowed my pussy and trickled down my legs.

  3. Sponge by Cryptopotamus · · Score: -1

    Sponge's can contract virii. Linux is similar to sponges. It starts small then grows so large that it is killed by industry.

    --


    Humpty Dumpty was pushed.
  4. With a Grain of Salt by DJOrient · · Score: 0

    My mom always said to take things with a grain of salt - and always question the reputation of the source.

    1. Re:With a Grain of Salt by netsharc · · Score: 1
      Nicely said. Bah, Code Red over-hyped? Fucking journalist probably didn't even know that it wasn't some lame VBscript Outlook virus that exploits the idiocy of PHBs to double-click them, instead a virus that only exploited the web server service from the secure-company-wannabe and could spread itself sans PHB (thereby more appropriately called a worm), fuck the technology idiots at CNN. How are the viruses being ranked anyway? By the frequency of its appearance in Outlook inboxes? Of course Code Red won't show up in such a list.

      On the other hand, it's quite fair to say that antivirus companies have to do a lot of marketing to sell their products. It looks like McAfee has switched into a "web service" company that needs you to pay to connect to their server so they can run an ActiveX virus-scanner, all from MSIE. But hey, we're in a depression, gotta survive somehow. The sky is falling, the sky is falling, yeah it is..

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  5. 2nd p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    I'm number 2

    1. Re:2nd p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a kid Number One and Number Two was never something you wanted to be.

    2. Re:2nd p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See where that got you now!

    3. Re:2nd p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Um... a fear of scatophiles?

  6. Mirror by Alan_Thicke · · Score: -1
    --
    Alan Thicke's Journal
    My Slashdot ads say "
  7. Scares are enough by stoolpigeon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    People should be glad the vulnerabilities were not exploited to a greater extent and keep on working to keep things secure.

    If people broke into my house one night and left after defacing my home, but didn't take or destroy anything - I'd still be pretty upset. And if it was because I'd left the front door open- I would really think about closing it and installing a lock (or locking it if there was already one that I had just left unlocked).

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Scares are enough by Binky+The+Oracle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Agreed.

      After all, "just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you."

      --

      Slashdot comments... splitting hairs since 1997.

    2. Re:Scares are enough by tenman · · Score: 1

      when you say after defacing my home and then you say but didn't take or destroy anything what do you mean by defacincing? seems like you just contradicted yourself.

    3. Re:Scares are enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Scares are enough by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      People should be glad the vulnerabilities were not exploited to a greater extent and keep on working to keep things secure
      Nope, explanation below
      If people broke into my house one night and left after defacing my home, but didn't take or destroy anything - I'd still be pretty upset. And if it was because I'd left the front door open- I would really think about closing it and installing a lock
      Bzzzzzt, correction, it's the company's office. The places where admins and developers are now treated like sh**. If someone breaks into the office, then the managers stop shouting, "There are 1000s of dot-com MBAs out of work queuing for your job, you will work from 8am to 11pm, no questions". For a change give you a little respect while you repair the virus damage and shout at them for stupidly opening an .exe attachment. You shore up the firewall rules to show that you're doing something, but then management starts bitchin' about how ICQ, AOL IM, MSN IM, Kazaa, etc. won't work right. So you change the firewall rules back. No change. If you *even suggest* that they stop using Microsoft Exchange they will fire you on the spot.

      As far as "your own house" is concerned, it's your fault if people break in easily. Set up your ip chains, inetd.conf and tcp wrappers. Heck use OpenBSD if you're that paranoid, we have OS choice now people - it's just the free money that's gone.

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    5. Re:Scares are enough by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      yeah - no metaphore is perfect and I was trying to keep this one aimed more at what the virii did to the web sites.

      Plus I was just thinking "How would you know they were there if they didn't do anything?"

      One time I came home and my bike had been moved from the living room to the kitchen. Turns out the apartment people had given a carpet cleaning guy the wrong key and apartment number. When he saw my wife sleeping in the bedroom he left.

      I was beside myself. That's a better example. No harm was done - but I reemed the girl in the office. I had been out getting my paycheck early that morning. If I had been home when that guy came in he would have had the snot scared out of him and I would have had to go through even more hassle of dealing w/the cops, etc. ( I sleep w/a gun by the bed - I wouldn't have shot him but I'd have held him there until the police arrived- regardless of what he said about being a cleaning guy)

      but that story was awful long so I didn't put it in the post. The point is don't walk around w/your pants down, bent over because no one has done anything to you yet.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    6. Re:Scares are enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to do a) without doing b), wiseass.

    7. Re:Scares are enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But imagine if the door didn't have a lock on it at all. And the door manufacturer had you locked into a contract, whereby all add-ons to said door could only be purchased from them. And they were none too quick to build the locks. And people were just running in and out of your house all willy-nilly, spray painting the walls or what-not. Now imagine a door that not only let you add your own locks, hinges, knobs, or whatever else you like, but that actually gave you the blueprints to build more doors of your own! And the plans were free! Not that this has anything to do with computers, I just think free doors would be cool. ;)

    8. Re:Scares are enough by tenman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Stool,
      I like that story much better, and this is turning out to be a nice little thread here. Sorry to hear about the carpet guy (I'm glad to heat that you sleep with a gun now, I was getting worried about your habbit of sleeping with blowup sheep dolls. [j/k]) I hope the the apartment chick was cute and was into you rimming her. Also, I've never tried to walk around with my pants down, but your right, nothing has ever happened to mr be back there.

      I want to thank AC for pointing out the difference in deface and distroy. His/Her examples where right on target, and let me know that defacing an object does not mean to make it completely unusable. Two thumbs up to him, except where he called me a wise ass. I didn't enjoy that part, but as it turns out, he might be right.

      sit back and enjoy the rest of your day and thank you for flying NorthSouthern Airlines.

    9. Re:Scares are enough by 56ker · · Score: 1

      For all the hype about viruses I've actually got one! It's a type of hybris.gen virus that isn't detected by av-free, or Norton Antivirus or McAffee! So how do I know I've got it you may ask. Because each time I try to send a mail in Pegasus it sends a second one (it affects the WSOCK32.DLL file and edits some registry keys) - also a friend told me. I've just switched to a webmail system instead. The only thing is I wish there was some way to remove it short of formatting the drive.

    10. Re:Scares are enough by Jobe_br · · Score: 1

      So, why don't you report it to Symantec's AVRC (anti-virus research center)?!? There's a convenient step-by-step form online to fill out. If you've truly discovered a new one, they'll be able to help you, I imagine.

    11. Re:Scares are enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      defacement can sometimes be repaired, cleaned, or otherwise returned to its previous state.

      destroy implies it is gone forever and unfixable.

      there. a without b. easy.

    12. Re:Scares are enough by 56ker · · Score: 2

      I did - sent off the WSOCK32.DLL file and got an e-mail back saying it wasn't infected! Sometimes I wonder if I'm the only one who has/ knows about this virus! If you want like me to send it to you to have a go at detecting it yourself just e-mail me at level80uk2@REMOVETHECAPSyahoo.co.uk .

    13. Re:Scares are enough by Jobe_br · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm not usually in a win32 environment (Linux/OS X usually) so I wouldn't be much help. Maybe someone else, though ..

    14. Re:Scares are enough by rubinson · · Score: 2

      After all, "just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get you."

      And of course, as Woody Allen observed, "When everybody actually is out to get you, paranoia is just good thinking."

    15. Re:Scares are enough by sQuirlbuz · · Score: 1

      Just to let you know. hybris.gen is definitely detected by mcafee. Do system adminstration and have found on various users computer using mcafee.. so whatever you may have is not hybris.gen

    16. Re:Scares are enough by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Well all I can say is that I tried McAfee and it didn't work - maybe they've updated their virus definitions since then! There are a few different forms of the virus too - so maybe it detects some and not others. The thing I've found is hybris.gen as it modifies this key in the registry HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curr entVersion\RunOnce - and if you delete that one it switches to HKEY_USERS\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersi on\RunOnce .As no other virus exhibits this sort of behaviour I'm sure I know what it is!

  8. Nimda by Zephy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Probably still the most damaging as far as I have experienced... the majority of problems with viruses i see are users passing on pretty obvious viruses.. maybe the answer is in the education rather than the protection

    1. Re:Nimda by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. Nimda lived up to the hype at my office. That thing took us out for a whole day.

      Yes, Code Red was overhyped. But some viruses deserve the strong warnings. It's not like there's huge hype every day about some virus so that you don't even pay attention.

      mark

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    2. Re:Nimda by crow · · Score: 2

      I'm still getting at least one hit per day on my cable modem from Nimda. Code Red is less frequent, but still around, too.

      It's an annoyance, not a problem; my web server is running on a 90MHz Pentium laptop. Of course, I'm running Linux.

    3. Re:Nimda by jobugeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try sitting on AT&T's network. Our company webservers get probed atleast a dozen times a day from Nimba. 99% of them are addresses registered within AT&T.

      --
      I'm not drunk, I just have a speech impediment. And a stomach virus. And an inner ear infection.
    4. Re:Nimda by MadCow42 · · Score: 2

      Nimbda trashed our IIS webserver COMPLETELY, and to this day I still log about 10,000 hits a week from infected computers outside our network.

      The good news is that IT has given the webserver responsibility to ME... it's now a fairly secure Linux box that I can play with all I like. q:]

      MadCow.

      --
      I used to have a sig, but I set it free and it never came back.
    5. Re:Nimda by flewp · · Score: 2

      Code Red, overhyped? I thought hackers would love a Mountain Dew with even more caffeine! What is this world comign to?!

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    6. Re:Nimda by Telastyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe the reason Code Red was ineffective was because it was overhyped, and more people installed prevention/knew to avoid it?

      Food for thought.

    7. Re:Nimda by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      A few Code Red-infected servers brought the rest of our network to it's knees. Nimda also did so, mostly due to the same pack of idiot NT admins.

      We pass those costs on to you when you use our services, rest assured.

    8. Re:Nimda by Brigadier · · Score: 2



      I worked at a mid size firm when the melissa's and I love you viruses were being passed, and it was incredible how quickly it propagated and shut down the system. there were about 600 employees on that site and within a half an hour 70 percent of the pc's were hit, then mail servers were down for the rest of the day while IT went through and peice by peice removed the virus from individual mail boxes.. Yes viruses like this can be easily prevented but if they propagate faster than IT's ability to send out the word what do you do. I finally convinced IT to filter out all vbs,js scrips via e-mail. if programmers were sending code it was zipped up or sent in an non exicutable format.

    9. Re:Nimda by tps12 · · Score: 1

      In the words of Homer Simpson, I'll take the crab juice.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    10. Re:Nimda by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, that's a good thing to note.

      I was always thinking this when the Y2K problem came and went. Everybody was saying how important it was and scrambled to try to make things Y2K compliant. Then it hit the year 2000, and almost nothing noteworthy happened. Instead of people saying "Hooray, our hyping and precautionary measures worked!", everybody though "Man! We were getting all excited over nothing! What a waste of time!"

      Maybe the fact that these virus attacks seemed lesser than expected is the proof that the hype is good. (Better to err on the side of safety?)

      mark

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    11. Re:Nimda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Code Red was "as real as the streets" and was intended for consumption at basketball-related events. I was mislead.

    12. Re:Nimda by Spy4MS · · Score: 1

      True, Nimda was nasty. But CodeRed is still around and still doing damage.

      I get at least three CodeRed attacks a day on my webserver from machines that have been infected.

      If only I had the time to hunt down and send email to all of those site admins... I'd probably read slashdot instead, but it would still be nice to have the time.

    13. Re:Nimda by lgallion · · Score: 1

      The virus problem is huge, but its effects can't easily be seen because most viruses are not destructive. Want proof? Just do this simple test. Take an unneeded Windows 9x box (is that redundant?), install a current virus detection program, share the 'C' drive with no password and drop it on the Internet. Your mileage may vary, but I collected dozens of instances of Nimbda.A, Nimbda.E, Bymer and Slim.A (a rare one) in just a few days. And the number of virus packets really starts to add up. For example, my humble viral Honeypot (http://www.honeypot.org) once logged 38 megs of Nimbda traffic in just one day (although 100-300K of viral traffic is more typical).

      If you were about to say 'what idiot shares their 'C' drive with no password,' you would be surprised. I did an unscientific poll (read 'port scan') of several class C addresses neighboring my own DSL IP address range. I typically find one or two Win 9x systems per class C with a shared drive and no password! Sure this is a bone-headed move by computer newbies, but if so many people are sharing drives on the Internet, how many people practice safe email attachment handling or keep their virus scanners up to date (if they even have one)?

    14. Re:Nimda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We pass those costs on to you when you use our services, rest assured.


      No worries, the first time you have down time because your admins didn't install a patch a month before an exploit hit the wild (Code Red), you're no longer providing services to us.

    15. Re:Nimda by seann · · Score: 1

      Your a spy for MS!
      say SQL!!!

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    16. Re:Nimda by BLAMM! · · Score: 2

      They said, "Man! We were getting all excited over nothing! What a waste of time!", because it was. In the States, and I'm sure in a few other countries, we were going ape shit over a media hyped threat. Most of the world decided to wait and see and clean up the mess afterward. Nothing more than a few amusing antedotes happened anywhere.

      Hype is not good. Facts are good.

    17. Re:Nimda by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2
      They said, "Man! We were getting all excited over nothing! What a waste of time!", because it was.

      Maybe it was... but maybe it wasn't. You don't actually know that, which was my point. Yes, not very much happened, but maybe it was a result of the efforts to avoid the problem. I don't know which countries decided to just wait as you say. But maybe the efforts that took place in the US were also of benefit to those other countries. Those few amusing anecdotes could perhaps have been much worse. It's all interconnected.

      It is just something interesting to think about and can't truly be answered... by answering it you are missing the point.

      mark
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    18. Re:Nimda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They said, "Man! We were getting all excited over nothing! What a waste of time!", because it was. In the States, and I'm sure in a few other countries, we were going ape shit over a media hyped threat. Most of the world decided to wait and see and clean up the mess afterward. Nothing more than a few amusing antedotes happened anywhere.


      I doubt most other countries has quite as much dependent on fixing the y2k bug. And I don't consider the Downs Syndrome testing failures to be "a few amusing antedotes(sic)".

      I did some 2yk stuff, the threat was quite real.

    19. Re:Nimda by HiThere · · Score: 2

      No. The most damaging viruses are the ones that you don't notice, but alter your data.

      A really adapted virus wouldn't be distinguishable from a bug, and you wouldn't notice when it transmitted itself.

      Consider the possibility that much of the instability of Windows is due to the code base being infected by a huge number of "transposons" that started off as DOS viruses. Can you prove it didn't happen? And you only notice them when the BSOD shows up. Only you don't notice them then, because nobody can figure out what caused the problem.

      If virus is a reasonable term to use, then this seems to me as a likely possibility. They're just so common (and otherwise hard to see) that nobody notices.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    20. Re:Nimda by mrobinso · · Score: 1

      Zephy writes:

      > Probably still the most damaging as far as I
      > have experienced... the majority of problems
      > with viruses i see are users passing on pretty
      > obvious viruses.. maybe the answer is in the
      > education rather than the protection

      A non-prof arts office a friend volunteers at
      got wiped out by Nimba in a big way. 4 desktops
      and a server pooched.

      The only reason CNN would write such a story is
      they're well guarded against the potential
      damage. Everyone knows CNN doesn't use real
      computers. They have Compaqs. Viruses _never+ bother with Compaqs.

      --
      -- Karma whore? You betcha. --
    21. Re:Nimda by ChocoboKnight · · Score: 1

      Here at school in Mexico, it took it by storm. The guys in IT did not stand a chance against it for a while (it took out 2 WinNT Lotus Notes servers on the first hour). Because many of the school courses are based there, no one could submit homeworks or check for information while they were repairing them. For us students, it was a break; for teachers, it wrecked their schedule for the day. This happened with Nimda, and to a lesser extent, with Code Red. As I write this, I've received 4 emails with the KLEZ virus, all from school's addresses. And note, the school has a campus license for Norton AV. Guess people should really start updating theirs software, I mean, how hard is it to let LiveUpdate run automatically?

    22. Re:Nimda by McSpew · · Score: 2

      Nimda laid waste to two sites on my dozen-site WAN. My employee in Indianapolis drove out to Cincinnati to clean up the Nimda mess and install better antivirus software, and before he was done there, the Indianapolis office got hit hard by Nimda.

      We were in the process of converting company-wide from consumer-grade antivirus (bundled with most of our PCs by the manufacturer) to corporate-grade AV software that was centrally managed. The Nimda outbreak accelerated our move to the corporate AV suite. Now that I have that corporate AV suite and a virus-scanning email gateway that automatically blocks most executable attachments, I'm much more secure, but I'm far from completely immune.

      My poor employee from Indianapolis pulled a 36 hour shift expunging Nimda and I have friends who also pulled multi-day shifts cleaning up Nimda.

      Anybody who thinks Nimda was overhyped is a jackass.

    23. Re:Nimda by mbogosian · · Score: 1

      I agree. Nimda lived up to the hype at my office. That thing took us out for a whole day.

      I still get several hundred hits a day from worms on my machine through my AT&T broadband subscription (I can't imagine how many we get at work). I'm running linux with not many daemons or ports exposed so my machine isn't compromised by these particular attacks, but that's still bandwidth that's now unusable by me. So yeah, I'd say I was affected by all these worms, despite not running any MS software.

    24. Re:Nimda by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      No worries, the first time you have down time because your admins didn't install a patch a month before an exploit hit the wild (Code Red), you're no longer providing services to us.

      We're FedEx. Enjoy.

  9. CmdrTaco: Homophobe or Homosexual? by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    RED
    Tend to be tigers in the sack. They are easily aroused and enjoy sex in
    every way imaginable. Once the sexual spark is lighted, it may take
    hours to extinguish. When two Reds get together, the ensuing erotica
    could make Lady Chatterley blush. Lovers of Red tend to be the
    aggressors and weaker colours should beware!

    YELLOW
    If you tend to favour Yellow your sexual drivers are complex and lean
    toward the adaptable. The favourite colour of homosexuals is Yellow! No
    don't panic - not everyone who wears Yellow is gay. In most cases the
    person will acquiesce to the stronger partner's desires in a passive
    manner. You will never enjoy sex to the fullest, but you will never turn
    down an invitation from someone you enjoy or admire.

    PURPLE
    Lovers of the colour Purple frequently consider themselves too regal for
    a fun romp in the sack. Women sometimes are the type who hate to muss
    their hair. Men are business-like in their approach to lovemaking. In
    both sexes, Purple partners are more concerned with their fulfilment
    than anyone else's gratification.

    BLACK
    Black colour preferences point to Black sex. These people are the
    misfits of the sex world and seek out each other in kinship. They tend
    to prefer perverted sex and are usually masochistic or sadistic in
    nature. They are moody people and often perform at their peak when under
    stress or during unhappy times. Police psychiatrists claim that many sex
    offenders prefer the colour Black. And it is no coincidence that the
    uniform of monsters and teenaged gangs is Black attire.

    GREEN
    Those who prefer Green are fresh and innocent in their approach to sex.
    Women who love Green will make love like virgins all of their life. And
    a man may always be a trifle clumsy and awkward, but in a charming and
    endearing sort of way. Green lovers are gentle, but not passionate. If
    chosen as a mate, one will never need worry about infidelity.

    PINK
    Persons who like Pink show a reluctance to mature in sexual matters.
    Women tend to tease; to promise more than they intend to deliver. In
    some cases, they flaunt their femininity - but because they secretly
    hate men. A great percentage of prostitutes boast entire lingerie
    wardrobes in Pink. Men who like Pink are philanderers and flirts. They
    are the type who will take three dates for the same evening and not keep
    one; preferring to pick up a dish in some bar, instead. Women whose
    husbands like Pink should keep a secret nest egg for when they are
    deserted. Pink indicates a tendency to squander money. ORANGE
    People who favour Orange tend to have sexual fantasies. The sex act is
    regarded as a dramatic role, a one-act play in which they are the star.
    Foreplay is as important as the act of love. They whisper sweet nothings;
    meaningless dialogue they feel fits their image. Orange people often do not
    experience orgasm, but they put on a darn good act. Men tend to pull their
    partner's hair and women leave red welts on their sex partners back. But the
    bruises and the ballyhoo add up to nothing.

    BROWN
    If you love Brown, you are a real treasure for the right mate. Brown lovers
    tend to be warm and deep. Sensitive to the needs and desires of their
    partners. Sex is a 24-hour a day thing to them. They can't say "I Love You"
    often enough. Snuggling by the fire, walking in the rain or catching
    snowflakes on their tongue is a turn on to a lover of Brown. They need lots
    of time and privacy to make love. But their emotions are such that one harsh
    word could end the affair.

    GRAY
    The colour Gray is preferred by people who are indecisive. They can't get
    excited about anything - including colours - so they choose a noncommittal
    shade. Men who prefer Gray look at sex as a means of relieving tension,
    (nothing more, nothing less). It's wham, bam, thank you ma'am. Women who
    prefer Gray don't make love, they have intercourse. And for one of two
    reasons, to accommodate their mate or to become pregnant. They count the
    cracks in the bedroom plaster until the sex act is over with and done. When a
    Gray marries another Gray, the marriage is made in heaven. But when teamed
    with another colour, the Gray spouse considers the colour's infidelity a
    blessing.

    BLUE
    Lovers of Blue are wonderful sex partners. They are sincere, affectionate and
    sensitive to their partners needs. They consider lovemaking a fine art and
    their approach is elegant. Men who love Blue are like concert pianists;
    delicately ravaging their partner like they would play a baby grand. Women in
    the Blue category enjoy sex to the fullest. They are exciting partners, but
    their passion might be compared to tidal waves rather than fiery aggression.
    Both men and women enjoy foreplay and the aftermath of love-making as much as
    the sex act itself. In marriage, a Blue person is a wonderful mate - never
    failing to please the spouse and never seeking outside interests.

    WHITE
    If a person in infatuated with White, sex often seems dirty. These people are
    puritanical in nature. French kissing is obscene and to make love in daylight
    in unheard of. Women who love White will undress beneath the covers. Men will
    shower before and after the sex act. These people will use pet names for
    their genitals.

  10. Oh no! More Slashdot crap. I'm going to vomit by The+Turd+Report · · Score: -1

    BHLBGULHGBUL \\\\\\// GULHBGULHGBULHGBULHGBULHGBULHGBULHGBULHGBULHGBULHG BULH
    BLHVULHGBUL \\\ \ ULHGBULHGULHNGULHGBULHGBULHGBULHGBULHGNULHNGNGHGBG ULHBG
    LHUGBULHGBH \\ <oo) ULHBULHGBULHGBULHGBULHGBULHGBULHULHULHSDULHGULHGUL HGUL
    BHLBHGHBUHL \\C \ LHGULHHULBULHHGULHNULHGULHGBULHGULHGBULHBHLGBULHBG ULHF
    UHULHH \\ __\ ULHGBULHULHSULHULHBGULHULHULHWULHULHBULHULHGAYLBGL HHF
    ULHBHH ttr / _\':. NGUHGULHNGULHULHNGGBULHLHGULHNGULHNGULHULHGBULHH
    LIHNUL / _\'..:. :. ULHGBULHGBULHGULHGBLHLHUOGHBLHBDULHBDLHDFHDU
    BLHG BULHGB / ': : : : :. ULHGBULHGBULHBUHDEANBGUHGBLHBUSHFLBULNGBULHH
    BGUL HGBULHBULHG : ' :: : :. ULHBHULHULHULHBULHBULHBULHGBULHBULHGBULHBULH
    ULHG BULHGULHLHUGLHG . : ' . ULHGBULHULHULHNGULHGBULHGBULHBHGBULHGBULGBLHBU

  11. cell phone? by digitalsushi · · Score: 2

    the day i get a virus on my cell phone or pda is the day i throw said cell phone or pda into the windshield of whatever SUV it was that beamed it to me accidently whilst turning around to hit their children.

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    1. Re:cell phone? by tps12 · · Score: 2
      the day i get a virus on my cell phone or pda is the day i throw said cell phone or pda into the windshield of whatever SUV it was that beamed it to me accidently whilst turning around to hit their children.

      You will turn around to hit their children? Or the SUV owner will? Whose children, the virus's or the PDA's? Or the SUV's? Or yours?

      The day I get a virus in my body is the day I will hurl myself out the window and onto whoever it was who sneezed on me.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    2. Re:cell phone? by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

      Quark Proton Propulsion Fire Alien Propulsion Darkness Ice Physics Ion Alien Void
      Darkness Manic Quark Alien Propulsion Physics Fire Frigid Propulsion Manic Manic Void
      Fire Propulsion Frigid Physics Fire Ice Alien Propulsion Quark Fire Alien Quark
      Quark Frigid Proton Ion Frigid Propulsion Darkness Manic Quark Proton Ice Physics
      Physics Ion Manic Proton Fire Ice Frigid Ice Frigid Quark Alien Proton
      Ice Alien Manic Darkness Alien Fire Alien Darkness Darkness Physics Propulsion Propulsion
      Proton Void Physics Manic Ion Frigid Proton Fire Alien Fire Alien Physics
      Physics Alien Ion Proton Quark Ice Quark Ice Ice Fire Alien Void
      Darkness Alien Alien Ion Manic Darkness Proton Ice Physics Ion Manic Fire
      Frigid Physics Ice Manic Physics Ion Physics Proton Quark Manic Propulsion Propulsion
      Propulsion Physics Physics Fire Proton Darkness Quark Darkness Ion Propulsion Alien Propulsion
      Quark Ion Propulsion Darkness Propulsion Quark Manic Darkness Fire Alien Physics Physics
      Propulsion Fire Proton Proton Darkness Ion Alien Propulsion Frigid Proton Darkness Ion
      Ion Propulsion Proton Void Fire Physics Frigid Ion Proton Propulsion Proton Ice
      Propulsion Ion Ion Void Darkness Physics Physics Proton Physics Fire Frigid Ion
      Propulsion Quark Void Physics Physics Manic Void Physics Ice Void Quark Ice
      Void Fire Proton Proton Physics Frigid Darkness Fire Void Frigid Void Fire
      Quark Quark Alien Darkness Ion Proton Frigid Propulsion Void Proton Fire Darkness
      Proton Propulsion Proton Frigid Quark Physics Alien Physics Void Void Propulsion Fire
      Propulsion Proton Frigid Frigid Propulsion Propulsion Ion Alien Ice Propulsion Fire Void
      Ice Darkness Propulsion Manic Manic Propulsion Propulsion Proton Fire Ice Manic Proton
      Propulsion Darkness Darkness Alien Fire Manic Void Proton Manic Darkness Alien Manic
      Ion Void Physics Ice Ion Propulsion Manic Ice Darkness Alien Frigid Proton
      Physics Fire Manic Manic Proton Ion Alien Proton Alien Frigid Manic Fire
      Frigid Darkness Darkness Ice Darkness Quark Ion Ion Darkness Quark Frigid Frigid
      Physics Fire Quark Ion Frigid Fire Proton Darkness Physics Frigid Physics Fire
      Darkness Void Void Fire Manic Darkness Manic Darkness Ice Frigid Physics Propulsion
      Darkness Ion Manic Frigid Void Darkness Quark Fire Physics Physics Ice Void
      Ice Propulsion Ice Physics Propulsion Propulsion Manic Ion Propulsion Propulsion Propulsion Ion
      Manic Ion Frigid Alien Void Proton Physics Void Fire Darkness Ice Void
      Frigid Quark Alien Fire Ion Proton Alien Quark Physics Void Alien Darkness
      Ion Frigid Ion Frigid Fire Darkness Proton Physics Propulsion Ice Manic Alien
      Ion Physics Frigid Ion Propulsion Fire Quark Void Darkness Manic Physics Physics
      Propulsion Proton Quark Alien Darkness Ion Physics Ion Proton Fire Frigid Ice
      Ice Ion Frigid Propulsion Manic Void Void Void Frigid Manic Ion Proton
      Darkness Physics Physics Frigid Ice Ion Propulsion Frigid Quark Ion Void Frigid
      Proton Proton Physics Quark Ion Fire Fire Propulsion Quark Manic Ice Propulsion
      Void Proton Propulsion Ice Ice Manic Frigid Darkness Ion Quark Frigid Ion
      Void Physics Proton Quark Alien Physics Quark Propulsion Proton Propulsion Darkness Void
      Void Proton Alien Alien Ion Manic Quark Frigid Void Ice Frigid Ion
      Darkness Propulsion Ion Darkness Ion Proton Physics Physics Proton Propulsion Fire Physics
      Physics Quark Frigid Proton Darkness Ion Alien Ion Ice Physics Manic Physics
      Ion Fire Ion Fire Void Manic Ice Proton Quark Fire Darkness Propulsion
      Fire Fire Ice Alien Propulsion Darkness Frigid Ice Ion Propulsion Proton Frigid
      Frigid Frigid Quark Quark Fire Ice Physics Manic Manic Void Quark Void
      Proton Quark Alien Fire Alien Fire Proton Proton Fire Ice Ion Proton
      Darkness Frigid Proton Physics Ion Ice Quark Fire Alien Physics Propulsion Physics
      Quark Frigid Alien Void Quark Physics Proton Manic Propulsion Void Quark Propulsion
      Void Fire Propulsion Darkness Frigid Quark Alien Proton Ion Ion Manic Fire
      Void Void Quark Proton Alien Ion Void Proton Fire Manic Fire Propulsion
      Fire Void Quark Alien Fire Manic Alien Ion Void Ion Manic Void
      Alien Alien Fire Propulsion Physics Darkness Ice Quark Quark Manic Frigid Ice
      Darkness Ice Void Darkness Frigid Propulsion Manic Void Alien Frigid Physics Physics
      Physics Proton Frigid Darkness Propulsion Ice Alien Manic Ion Proton Fire Physics
      Ice Frigid Propulsion Fire Physics Physics Proton Physics Propulsion Fire Ion Quark
      Frigid Manic Proton Ion Proton Darkness Proton Frigid Darkness Quark Darkness Ice
      Ion Fire Quark Physics Ion Manic Manic Manic Propulsion Alien Void Fire
      Alien Ice Frigid Quark Propulsion Proton Physics Manic Ice Alien Void Ice
      Propulsion Darkness Void Darkness Fire Ice Physics Ion Ice Physics Proton Ion
      Ion Alien Quark Ion Void Void Physics Frigid Fire Proton Ion Frigid
      Fire Ion Frigid Frigid Propulsion Darkness Quark Frigid Ice Propulsion Proton Ion
      Alien Alien Ion Physics Physics Manic Darkness Frigid Frigid Ice Ion Darkness
      Proton Void Fire Darkness Alien Alien Alien Ion Physics Ice Ice Quark
      Proton Proton Physics Darkness Propulsion Fire Frigid Ion Propulsion Quark Proton Ice
      Proton Quark Manic Frigid Void Darkness Quark Void Darkness Manic Physics Frigid
      Proton Alien Quark Propulsion Fire Frigid Propulsion Void Ion Manic Manic Ion
      Propulsion Void Quark Proton Fire Ice Fire Proton Manic Physics Physics Physics
      Quark Frigid Ion Propulsion Frigid Ion Manic Proton Fire Darkness Ice Void
      Propulsion Proton Frigid Darkness Physics Ion Frigid Ice Ice Manic Void Fire
      Propulsion Quark Proton Ice Alien Ion Ion Darkness Frigid Propulsion Alien Proton
      Void Physics Frigid Frigid Darkness Manic Physics Proton Void Propulsion Propulsion Frigid
      Manic Manic Propulsion Darkness Quark Proton Ion Void Manic Manic Frigid Ice
      Fire Alien Manic Manic Alien Darkness Darkness Void Frigid Quark Void Darkness
      Quark Frigid Quark Physics Alien Quark Propulsion Frigid Proton Propulsion Manic Void
      Ion Quark Darkness Physics Manic Darkness Proton Frigid Frigid Darkness Ice Ion
      Darkness Fire Manic Manic Manic Frigid Frigid Ion Darkness Ion Alien Ice
      Alien Proton Ice Manic Frigid Frigid Ice Void Quark Proton Manic Propulsion
      Physics Quark Ion Proton Ice Void Physics Propulsion Physics Alien Frigid Darkness
      Ice Alien Alien Alien Propulsion Quark Fire Quark Alien Physics Physics Propulsion
      Ice Quark Ion Propulsion Manic Quark Physics Void Fire Proton Physics Frigid
      Quark Propulsion Darkness Ion Physics Propulsion Fire Physics Manic Manic Physics Propulsion
      Void Frigid Ice Ice Physics Alien Proton Void Alien Propulsion Manic Quark
      Propulsion Propulsion Void Ion Fire Physics Ice Fire Proton Quark Ice Ice
      Void Propulsion Darkness Void Void Alien Fire Quark Fire Void Proton Frigid
      Quark Proton Frigid Frigid Darkness Ion Frigid Alien Void Quark Manic Frigid
      Ice Quark Ice Physics Manic Alien Ion Alien Fire Quark Fire Fire
      Frigid Quark Void Ice Proton Physics Alien Ice Fire Proton Propulsion Quark
      Void Fire Proton Alien Frigid Manic Void Darkness Ion Ice Frigid Frigid
      Manic Darkness Darkness Quark Quark Quark Ice Ion Void Alien Quark Fire
      Ion Manic Ice Darkness Proton Quark Manic Ice Alien Quark Ion Manic
      Frigid Frigid Propulsion Ice Darkness Frigid Frigid Darkness Manic Manic Propulsion Proton
      Fire Physics Quark Darkness Alien Alien Ion Void Quark Quark Darkness Alien
      Ice Frigid Proton Void Propulsion Fire Quark Proton Manic Propulsion Ice Propulsion
      Propulsion Quark Void Physics Alien Ice Physics Void Alien Ice Void Propulsion
      Darkness Alien Propulsion Quark Fire Physics Void Void Fire Manic Fire Ice
      Proton Ion Ion Proton Void Physics Manic Propulsion Manic Frigid Void Frigid
      Proton Ice Alien Manic Quark Fire Physics Propulsion Frigid Frigid Void Proton
      Fire Manic Quark Quark Physics Ice Alien Propulsion Darkness Proton Alien Alien
      Darkness Ion Quark Frigid Fire Ice Fire Void Fire Physics Physics Ice
      Physics Ion Quark Void Quark Manic Darkness Void Physics Alien Fire Ion
      Propulsion Physics Manic Void Ion Ice Manic Quark Manic Ion Manic Fire
      Physics Quark Frigid Darkness Ion Darkness Ion Propulsion Ion Ion Physics Void
      Ion Manic Fire Manic Void Void Propulsion Physics Void Quark Manic Quark
      Frigid Fire Fire Ice Proton Frigid Manic Proton Alien Quark Fire Fire
      Ion Propulsion Ion Ice Quark Ice Ice Alien Proton Frigid Ice Proton
      Propulsion Ice Propulsion Void Frigid Proton Darkness Void Alien Void Ion Propulsion
      Frigid Quark Alien Quark Ion Alien Proton Darkness Fire Alien Ion Quark
      Ion Propulsion Frigid Physics Ice Physics Ice Frigid Fire Ion Physics Ice
      Manic Quark Proton Ice Manic Fire Void Ice Physics Void Fire Proton
      Manic Frigid Fire Darkness Propulsion Physics Ion Ice Frigid Ice Physics Frigid
      Void Quark Ice Manic Darkness Alien Darkness Manic Darkness Darkness Manic Ice
      Darkness Frigid Propulsion Physics Alien Alien Darkness Frigid Proton Darkness Alien Proton
      Darkness Quark Quark Darkness Manic Proton Proton Propulsion Frigid Physics Manic Fire
      Propulsion Frigid Quark Propulsion Propulsion Propulsion Alien Darkness Frigid Void Ice Frigid
      Darkness Physics Void Physics Void Frigid Proton Darkness Ice Propulsion Void Manic
      Frigid Quark Alien Darkness Ice Darkness Ion Alien Darkness Ion Manic Manic
      Void Manic Quark Proton Alien Quark Darkness Propulsion Quark Physics Alien Void
      Darkness Ice Frigid Propulsion Alien Quark Void Ice Fire Quark Proton Propulsion
      Frigid Proton Ion Void Physics Alien Manic Quark Propulsion Void Propulsion Physics
      Ice Darkness Ice Ion Alien Manic Ice Manic Void Physics Ice Physics
      Quark Darkness Fire Propulsion Alien Void Ion Alien Ice Fire Propulsion Void
      Manic Propulsion Alien Ice Ice Physics Proton Manic Darkness Frigid Physics Darkness
      Physics Frigid Quark Fire Manic Frigid Ion Ice Fire Propulsion Darkness Proton
      Alien Void Alien Propulsion Quark Alien Alien Manic Alien Proton Quark Ice
      Proton Ice Quark Void Manic Manic Alien Ice Darkness Manic Void Propulsion
      Darkness Frigid Darkness Ice Darkness Alien Propulsion Quark Ice Fire Fire Darkness
      Ice Frigid Physics Proton Ice Darkness Fire Alien Void Proton Darkness Proton
      Ice Ion Quark Ion Fire Manic Ice Quark Proton Proton Void Propulsion
      Propulsion Propulsion Darkness Void Frigid Propulsion Physics Manic Propulsion Quark Quark Propulsion
      Void Fire Darkness Proton Quark Frigid Ion Frigid Manic Frigid Physics Frigid
      Alien Darkness Physics Manic Frigid Propulsion Propulsion Fire Ion Frigid Ion Propulsion
      Physics Ice Propulsion Fire Frigid Fire Ice Alien Quark Frigid Alien Manic
      Propulsion Manic Void Physics Propulsion Frigid Manic Void Ice Proton Darkness Propulsion
      Physics Proton Physics Ion Darkness Darkness Alien Fire Ice Ion Proton Alien
      Darkness Ice Void Quark Proton Ion Frigid Fire Ice Ice Propulsion Alien
      Physics Physics Darkness Physics Void Ion Fire Physics Fire Alien Quark Propulsion
      Ion Manic Quark Darkness Physics Propulsion Ice Ice Propulsion Alien Propulsion Proton
      Alien Frigid Void Manic Void Propulsion Frigid Ice Alien Frigid Alien Quark
      Ion Frigid Manic Physics Ice Ion Propulsion Alien Void Alien Ice Alien
      Proton Void Darkness Alien Darkness Manic Proton Alien Void Frigid Ion Ion
      Darkness Frigid Darkness Proton Frigid Quark Fire Alien Ice Void Fire Ion
      Darkness Physics Void Manic Alien Ion Ion Quark Manic Frigid Alien Quark
      Physics Alien Fire Darkness Proton Darkness Darkness Quark Manic Ice Void Void
      Darkness Physics Ion Frigid Void Frigid Ion Alien Void Alien Quark Darkness
      Fire Darkness Ice Fire Void Physics Frigid Quark Ion Proton Fire Ice
      Ion Frigid Frigid Physics Fire Alien Frigid Physics Frigid Physics Ice Frigid
      Alien Fire Fire Ice Proton Proton Physics Proton Manic Darkness Manic Physics
      Darkness Darkness Darkness Quark Void Ion Frigid Frigid Manic Ice Darkness Ice
      Propulsion Frigid Propulsion Ice Quark Fire Quark Physics Proton Fire Void Ion
      Alien

  12. the really ubiquitous virii by kochsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    yah without consulting the list of the "top ten" virii, i would say the ones that get passed by floppy and email via word and excel documents are probably actually the most common ones...
    not the ones that have been hyped.

    i remember the ones that used to be really ubiquitous in the DOS/win3.1 days were the boot sector virii... those things were everywhere! and they could be passed on by floppy

    1. Re:the really ubiquitous virii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you know "virii" is not even a word. The plural of virus is viruses.

  13. Gloom and doom by Dead+Penis+Bird · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's just like the local weatherman.

    They are the first to predict 18 inches of snow for a storm that produces only six. News sources love reporting gloom, doom and disaster, for it increases viewership/readership.

    No one cares to hear "Nothing to see here, movealong".

    --

    If I weren't nailed to the penis, I'd be pushing up the daisies!

    1. Re:Gloom and doom by NaturePhotog · · Score: 2

      The old line about the news is "if it bleeds, it leads". It's true -- stories of disaster or impending disaster are way more prevelant on the news that positive stories.

    2. Re:Gloom and doom by Negadecimal · · Score: 2

      They are the first to predict 18 inches of snow for a storm that produces only six. News sources love reporting gloom, doom and disaster, for it increases viewership/readership

      They do, they do.

      But the weathermen also tend to overforcast because they'll take more flack if they leave the public underprepared. Better safe than sorry.

      But virus reports are mostly hype, because the media outlets don't have anything to lose if they keep quiet. People don't yell at CNN for not mentioning a virus in time.

    3. Re:Gloom and doom by OneFix · · Score: 2

      But the weathermen also tend to overforcast because they'll take more flack if they leave the public underprepared. Better safe than sorry.

      Can't this also be said for the Anti-Virus community...

      Actually, replace weathermen with any major AV software company, and you understand why they think it's all hype.

      Read this and see what I mean...

      McAfee tend to overforcast because they'll take more flack if they leave the public underprepared. Better safe than sorry.

  14. Hype maybe.... by NetJunkie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But without the hype there would be more people without anti-virus software. We don't see a LOT of viruses hit our mail server, but we do see a few every day. If one of those got in and a user ran it, we'd be in trouble.

    Better safe than sorry....

    1. Re:Hype maybe.... by blankmange · · Score: 2
      Yes there would be more people who contract the virus, but those who understand computers/know what they are doing with computers already know that regular (sometimes daily) updates to your antivirus software is mandatory. Why shouldn't we look at this as survival of the fittest? If people buy computers and don't understand what the computer can do for them and what risks they face if they use one (I am speaking about online usage here), why is this bad? Granted, I don't want my grandmother to be online, using her email, opening attachments from God-knows-where, so I take the time to educate her, explain to her about the pitfalls of being online and the possibility of picking up viruses; I don't just leave her to the mercy of the 'net.

      I understand that you are talking from a work perspective, and that in itself is completely different than the private, single user. Even in the work environment, employees either must be educated or have the access restricted - and don't give me the bs about restricting access at work; unless your work necessitates your access, you have no right/entitlement to online access at your jobsite.

      The point of the article is that many of the hyped viruses this past year have been basically less than what the media/software companies have made them out to be.

      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    2. Re:Hype maybe.... by VikingBerserker · · Score: 1

      I'm all for the Darwinist approach. After all, if enough people cripple their own systems due to a lack of security/awareness, perhaps we may get a better online culture. Remember how nice it was on the net even ten years ago, before serious spam issues and X10 ads? I wouldn't mind seeing a mass exodus that would lead to a rebirth of that era.

      The problem, of course, is that with viruses the ignorant among us will spread said viruses (I expect via "good luck" chain letters) to plenty of us who *do* know better, and just don't have appropriate anti-virus protection for the next big one. Just because you have protection software, it doesn't mean that you'll be protected from everything out there.

    3. Re:Hype maybe.... by Surlyboi · · Score: 1

      and don't give me the bs about restricting access at work; unless your work necessitates your access, you have no right/entitlement to online access at your jobsite.

      Not as easy as you'd think, especially when the
      biggest offenders are PHBs who will find it much
      easier to replace you than to curb their own bad
      habits.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine...
    4. Re:Hype maybe.... by chez69 · · Score: 0

      If that happened, it would probabally be the end of cheap fast bandwidth and the end of most on line services. Like it or not, the morons help keep bandwidth cheap.

      --
      PHP is the solution of choice for relaying mysql errors to web users.
    5. Re:Hype maybe.... by hatshepsut · · Score: 1
      You can explain to your grandmother about using anti-virus software, not opening attachments from strangers and all the other basic prophylactic methods to avoid catching these viruses, but you can't do everything long distance and some of these suckers don't need to you open anything for them to do their worst.

      Some basic education in the mass media means that when Grandma sees it in the paper, it will reinforce what I have told him. This sort of regular reminder helps a lot of newbies who would otherwise be on the phone screaming to their ISPs, their more knowledgeable friends and relatives, and anyone else who will listen.

      Heck, the first time one of my relatives deleted a suspicious email (that they had heard about from me and later the mass media) they felt they had really LEARNED something. 1 less total newbie in the world, at the cost of a warning from me, some basic anti-virus software, and a newspaper article. I can live with that.

    6. Re:Hype maybe.... by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is the internet, not the serengeti for christs' sake!

      Computers and the Internet are tools. people are suprised when they realize how high maintinence those tools are. I know I was.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  15. code red is hype? by jred · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's a good thing that Code Red was such a flop. Considering the # of hits my apache server gets every day from CR/nimda, I'd hate to see what would happen if it were still around.

    --

    jred
    I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    1. Re:code red is hype? by wizkid · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Yea Right.
      Code Red just spread itself. The company I work for only shut down email for 3 days trying to clear it out.

      Of course nimda was based on code red, and automagically propigates itself also. It's still around. And there are versions that open up your IIS webserver so the propigator can get in with asministrator access. And there's also the fact that a version of the nimda worm is busy looking around the net for vulnerable DNS/SSH access on unix boxes.

      Yea, the Code Red is harmless and didn't do any damage. And Corporate America didn't spend $millions$ cleaning up mail servers. And there are not thousands of boxes that hackers have back doors into because of the later Nimda versions.

      The moron that wrote this article is an asshole that doesn't know his head from a hole in the ground. But Hey, he got an article published on CNN, so what does it matter.

      --
      I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
  16. Well, the hype stops the thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Without the hype, nobody would take care about using any antivirus software and the virusses could course great problems. Now the hype makes sure people are (more or less) protected.

  17. slashdot janitors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    have plenty of experience here, with all the std's they have contracted.

  18. Maybe Code Red wasn't as bad as predicted... by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course the security companies are going to strongly emphasize the risk of viruses, it should be expected-- it's what they do!

    For news sites... they make everything overly dramatic. Maybe that's the problem.

    What this article is really addressing IMO is the fact that news sites like to exploit people's fears in order to increase readership/viewership. That's an across-the-board news problem, not a virus problem.

    mark

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Maybe Code Red wasn't as bad as predicted... by PowermonkeySquared · · Score: 1

      I spent a lot of time fixing friends and parents cisco 675 routers during and after Code Red. Qwest was so bogged down by tech support calls that they actually refused to help people for the first month. Two months later Qwest sold it's residential dsl isp service to Microsoft because they couldn't handle it. Maybe Code Red didn't "cripple the internet" but it sure caused some headaches.

      --
      Eating is for wimps.
    2. Re:Maybe Code Red wasn't as bad as predicted... by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

      interesting...Code Red, a worm exploiting a security whole in a MS product, hits Qwest so bad that they sell part of their company off to MS.
      maybe this is why security in Windows has been so lousy.

    3. Re:Maybe Code Red wasn't as bad as predicted... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you were expecting:
      "Today in the news nothing interesting happened, so were going to interview random people for five minutes and then go to Seinfeld reruns."

      fact is, they have to overhype things to make them interesting. A virus like Nimda isn't very interesting on it's own because it can be stopped with security measures, but overhype it and Bang everyone cares.

  19. Code Red by Aragorn+DeLunar · · Score: 2, Funny

    As I hold a delicious red caffienated beverage in my hand, I can't honestly say that the Code Red scare was all bad. :)

    --
    Cynicism, like dogmatism, can be an excuse for intellectual laziness. - Susan Shirk
    1. Re:Code Red by daeley · · Score: 1

      Oh, Lord, that stuff is liquid crack. Hawaiian Punch + Carbonation + Caffeine. Ohhhhhhhhhh.

      [logging out to go to 7-11]

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  20. OGG TO CRUSH MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    http://www.ogg-vorbis.com the new open, smaller file size, greater quality and FREE OGG! Down with MP3!

    1. Re:OGG TO CRUSH MP3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      all oggs bases are belonging to us all

  21. The envelope please... by bckspc · · Score: 3, Funny


    The "Top 10 for 2001" they are referring to are listed here.
    En español aquí.

    Funny, they all seem to have something in common...

    1. Re:The envelope please... by singularity · · Score: 2

      I believe a better link would be Top ten viruses reported to Sophos in 2001.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
    2. Re:The envelope please... by hendridm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Funny, they all seem to have something in common...

      Yeah, I noticed that too. They were all developed for the most widely used desktop OS in the world.

  22. What's happening at CNN? by October_30th · · Score: -1
    What the hell has happened to the CNN's tech journos?

    A sensible write-up of the hype around viruses, Linux friendly articles and spam awareness?

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  23. worldwide anthrax tour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It wasn't easy becoming president of the united states. It took a lot of hard work and perseverance. I had to sweet talk a lot of committee men, reassure a lot of lobbyists, and impress a lot of constituents. But I did do it, and now I get to be president.

    Some say that being president is the ultimate form of public service. I agree. That is why one of my first acts as president was to launch a full- scale nuclear strike against numerous civilian population centers both home and abroad.

    In all, I think we used about 4000 warheads, about half for the US and half for Europe and Asia. We only lobbed a few at the lower hemisphere, as I didn't see the point in wasting expensive weapons on niggers, spicanos, and their respective decrepit habitats. For example, we used a couple of solid, high- yield weapons on Mexico City but most of Argentina was untouched. Then again, within a month the radiation will have spread to those forests and the inhabitants will have ceased to exist.

    It takes a lot of skill and courage to demonstrate this kind of leadership. It also takes some direct assistance. I can't launch a full-scale nuclear strike by myself, it would require more willpower than any modern man has. But after getting some of my scary, hard-line friends into the White House, it was just a matter of time before we could retarget the missiles, stage a new soviet threat, and give the order to launch.

    On the first day of the new world, I addressed the American public and thoroughly confused them. I told them that Chechen rebels had siezed power in Moscow and had loosed nuclear warfare upon our peaceful nation. I told them that we would knock down their weapons with new technology, that at worst a few cities would be lost. In reality, I had given the order, and I had drawn up the target list, which included Manhattan, the Bronx, Brooklyn, Long Island, Staten Island, Westchester, Albany, Cornell, Binghamton, and Buffalo in New York State alone. We had targeted every major American city, every minor one and every major suburb we could find on a map. We were thorough as hell.

    I was in the air when the bombs fell, it seemed as safe as anywhere else and proved itself to be so. There were seven of us: me, two cabinet members, three secret service agents, and the pilot. We had offed everyone else in the White House on the way to the plane, not because we had to or even because we wanted to. We just did. Now there were seven of us, the Magnificent Seven, if you will, not looking for a bunker to hide in but to make a difference in people's lives.

    We had pulled it off pretty well because when we arrived at any particular destination, our respect and good name were still intact. You have no idea what it is like to show up at a munitions dump somewhere in the midwest, find some scared kid standing at the door, and off him. Just as he realizes who you are, and thanks God for your presence, you turn on him and fill his young virile form with scars of hot lead. There is nothing that compares to that, except maybe nuking your own people, or, nerve gassing indigenous populations.

    It would not be hard to nerve gas indigenous populations from the safety of the white house. I could, for example, get on the horn and give the Air Force a line straight into the jungle. However, there is something to be said for nuking your own pilots on the ground and going in there and doing it yourself, which is what we were prepared to do. We went to munitions dumps around the country and picked up anthrax, botulism, nerve gas, and a host of other fun toys. We loaded them up on the plane and headed for the southern hemisphere.

    Our first stop, Argentina. We landed the plane and told whoever happened to be standing there that we were there to help. It is not as if that country has a government or anything resembling civilization. We got off the plane with our suits and drums of spores, hired a truck into the middle of the jungle, and laid waste to as many people as we could find.

    It is remarkable the kind of respect one gets when one shows up wearing a radiation suit in the middle of a worldwide nuclear holocaust. In reality, we did not need the suits, not for radiation at least - it would take days or weeks for the specter of death to settle over the remote regions we were visiting. We wore the suits partly for respect and partly to handle the dangerous nerve agents we were handing out to the natives.

    Our favorite was the botburger, the botulism hamburger. We would mix botulism into ketchup and smear it all over food we were handing out to indigenous populations. I don't know why these people were eating our hamburgers; they had plenty of food themselves and the radiation hadn't yet reached their homes. I think it is possible that people instinctively like to be aided in a crisis. We usually had little trouble getting them to eat and the ones who didn't were offed as soon as the effects started to appear on the ones who did. You would think there would be a lot of gun-toting crazies in these remote native villages but there aren't, you can pretty much do whatever you want.

    At this point you are probably wondering how this all came together. I'm not really sure to be honest. Like I said, it took some teamwork but how the team assembled itself is not really clear. It was something we all wanted from the beginning, something we were raised to belive was right and just. We generally assumed a certain level of trust between the seven of us, and never really questioned each others' motives. After all, how do you verify that someone else wants nuclear death as much as you do? What happens if he pops you in the face right at the moment of decision? It doesn't matter really, this whole operation requires a certain kind of fatalism and it went forward primarily because we could all see that we were like-minded. If one of my friends offed me during our worldwide anthrax tour, I wouldn't really care, we're not really the kind of people who care about anything.

    Our next stop, Papua New Guinea. I'm not really sure where it is, you'd probably have to ask the pilot, but there were people there and we fed them anthrax and botulism. The ketchup method was really great for both agents, because it took the spores out of the air and put them right down peoples' throats. Now, you're probably wondering if I get a certain kind of glee from offing these people but the fact is, I don't. There's a certain kind of fatalism that's required, a certain kind of, this is the only thing we can do to help these people, and while they might be capable of helping themselves, maybe we can make one small difference in these people's lives.

    We saved the nerve gas for Africa. There was just no way I was going to hand out botburgers to black niggers, and besides, it's not like we were experts, it took a good two weeks to figure out how to work the nozzles. Once we got the gas flowing, however, we became pretty efficient. We could mow down a village in about six hours, which meant we could do three villages a day when the weather was clear. We could even work in shifts. A week in Africa, that's only ten or twenty villages but I had to wonder, would be the same for these people if I didn't get myself out there?

    At this point three weeks had gone by and the new weather was beginning to set in. We started wearing the suits pretty much the whole time and it felt different, like we had given birth to something greater than ourselves. There was a lot of gray now, and it didn't seem wrong so much as new, a color for the new millenium. I hadn't really been thinking about much of anything since we started our tour and it lent a certain ease to which I could appreciate our new surroundings. Population centers were few and far between, and the people we found were already stricken with disease. This is what we expected but we made sure to feed them botulism, it wasn't really clear why we should treat these people any differently than the healthy inhabitants we had been dealing with prior.

    We crossed naturally into Turkey, having left behind the plane somewhere mid-continent. It was a measure of how confident we were feeling, to be a thousand miles without our wings, because after all we were in the plane when the bombs went off and those little red lights below, you could just tell they weren't going to hurt us. We gassed Turks, and it was in Turkey that I realized that I had a pretty good efficiency for this, that I probably could have been in the military too and been fine.

    I think we were crazy to go to Europe but you know at that point how do you tell anymore? I mean, we certainly hadn't been romping around the US the whole time and being in Europe during the second month was kind of a chill. We met all kinds of people - Czechs, Poles, Slavs, Greeks, Germans, Frenchmen. Like I said, I was getting pretty efficient so I was gassing whole towns. I could get the remaining inhabitants huddled around some food or something and then I would turn on the gas. There's not much you can do when you're in a crowded room and the gas is suddenly on. This was especially satisfying in rooms full of dirty greeks, but I didn't really mind gassing the french or british either, there was a certain kind of, well, this is how it is.

    In the third month we started getting weary. We had seen most of what lies on the other side of the atlantic, and the pacific just wasn't as interesting. We tried to get our energy up by going to australia, but one look at those dirty natives and it was just gas, gas, gas. It was amazing at that point that none of our fatalism had poisoned our own success, I mean, there was no good reason why we should have made it to Australia, we were just an unusually committed team. And I think we were pretty satisfied with ourselves, too, that somehow maybe we were making a difference in the greater scheme of things.

    After Australia we went to go look at some slopes, which was kind of annoying but you know, making a difference and all that. With nuclear weapons we had made sure to leave nobody alive on the islands of Japan and we targeted Vietnam, Cambodia, Korea, and the rest of it pretty well, the way we should have when we were fighting those wars. But there were still plenty of chinkanos nestled here and there in China, and we went after them with anthrax, botulism, and nerve gas.

    We lost our pilot in China, which was funny because we had just picked up a transport in Britain for the ride over. It was our first flight in weeks and now we were stranded in pattyland, lugging tubs of sarin in and out of the mud and wondering what it really takes to kill indigenous populations. He fell, actually, which seems weird but at least it was a good honest death, not one of these efficiency killings we were dishing out with our sprayers and tubs of gas.

    Some of us stopped wearing our suits in China, which seems stupid but it depends on what you mean by it. The guys without suits moved pretty easily, sometimes they went off by themselves and took out an extra village because they could get around so much faster. It was kind of hard to keep a level head about it, I mean, on one hand I want to remove indigenous populations but on the other I want to make sure I'm still around to do it! So that was kind of hard, but we figured it didn't matter, so long as there were some of us left towards the end, it wasn't even that we considered survival important but that maybe we could last longer than most.

    I don't know how long the suits are rated for, but I think mine stopped working because I started hemorraging blood in China. It didn't help that we had been three months on the road, lugging tubs through mud and feeding anthrax to all kinds of spics, spicanos, chicanos, chinkanos, and chinkettes. I started throwing up blood and it seemed like maybe I wouldn't last too long after that. Probably one of the other guys would get tired of lugging me around and he would off me in my sleep. It's not that we didn't care about each other, we did but we were pretty focused on the mission, it was almost more respectful because we were all pretty interested in success.

    At this point the new weather was pretty harsh, and not only had I killed 200 million americans with heat and radiation, but I had picked up the fruits of their labor and used them to bring peace to a number of indigenous populations remaining in remote areas. I had probably killed 30 or 40 thousand niggers, nigglers, nigglettes, spics, spicanos, chicanos, chinkanos, chinkettes, slopes, slopanos, and slopettes with nerve gas, and we had given out as many hamburgers as we had in our possession. I felt good, like maybe I had made a small difference. And I slept, and for the first time in what seemed like forever, I dreamt of a green earth.

  24. How Linux Users Get Girls by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    for one if your girls friend doesn't fuck and you need head.. fuck a freshly
    dead bitch... it's still pussy no matter what way you look at it...

    ok dudes and dudettes:

    1>. 1st you gonna need a shovel. then goto a freshly made grave - start to dig
    'around 7 to 8 feet' deep.

    2>. now what you gunna find is a cement lid... well get a crowbar and remove
    the son-of-a-bitch... now u find a closed coffin 'shit'

    3>. you have two options at this point. one lift the coffin 8 feet above your
    head on to the flat ground above or two, open the coffin right then and there.

    4>. you might be a little chicken to look inside once you do ... put on two not
    one but two rubbers !!!!

    5>. undress the freshly buried bitch and bang away. when done if your not too
    tired to do steps 4-1. whenever you want a free fuck follow these steps.

    part ii 'the other solution...'

    1> not many people have this privilige but if you do you have it made... do u
    work in a morgue ? ... if so then check out the dead girly bodies that come
    in.

    2> take one out of the refrig and make sure nobodys around in the building or
    room.

    3> undress the bitch. put on your two rubbers. spread them legs and bang
    away... when done.. re-dress your partner and shove her back in the freezer.

    ok the reason for putting two rubbers on ur pecker is that so the maggots won't
    chew away at your dick, also if the dead bitch has any diseases you won't chat
    them !!! well remember to 'get head from the dead' !!!

    look for dead girlies named tanya!! they give the best head..

    also, dead fetuses are a real pleasure for all you little boys that have'nt
    gone through puberty yet. bringing dead fucks to a party really livens up the
    situation, when you get a really wasted bitch and prop her on the guy's rigor
    mortis'ed dick, they go for that kinda shit.

    another benefit of fucking the dead is grave robbing. back in ancient times
    sick fucks used to break into pharoh's tombs and rip off all the gold and
    jewels. from past experiences, some people burry themselves with some good
    shit, like gold chains, gold watches, diamond rings, pearls, and all kinds of
    neat shit...

    so if you wanna have a good time, and get paid for it, join your local morticians union

  25. Nimda is still fairly active/destructive by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Informative

    eWeek has an article about how Microsoft Windows Update has actually removed hot fixes, causing a site to be re-hit by Nimda.

    1. Re:Nimda is still fairly active/destructive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I have received a five-digit figure of those "scares" on a single account by now. SirCam, Klez, you name them. These aren't coming out of nowhere. Every single one of them comes from an infected machine, which for many worms means: backdoored machines. Free for anyone to take over (security is usually bad enough on systems which get infected, but the worms make them definite zombies, ready to add to the next DDoS attack, waiting to be abused as spam-relays or become hops in cracker-attacks. Hype my ass.

    2. Re:Nimda is still fairly active/destructive by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Even better when one of your co-workers decides to have Win2k update upon domain logon, oops there goes my last 7 or so hotfixes. Every freaking time you logon.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  26. All it takes is one moron in your company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And poof... There goes loads of old work, and here comes lots of fixes. There is a developer I work with that continually infects the network with viruses because he refuses to run antivirus software. Unfortunately he's got seniority so I just have to clean up his mess. Pathetic really.

  27. Other Virus Scares... by dupper · · Score: 0
  28. What's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    (a) a computer virus project

    or

    (b) sex with a mare
  29. Cell Phone Virus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    PDAs are the next marketing target, along with cellphones.
    Threat: Extreme Description: Changes your ring tone to N'Sync
  30. Nimba, CodeRed scares? by PenguinLord · · Score: 1

    Where were you when this was happening. These viruses affected me and i don't run windows. I'm still getting hits on my webserver. I think the viruses last year showed just how bad things have gotten.

  31. Viruses pray primarily on the stupid by nvts-NUTS · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Unfortunately for the rest of us most of the users of the Internet fall into this category. How simple is it to NOT open email attachments?!

    I'm a firm believer in revoking i-net privledges to employees who are stupid enough to send much less open attachments of the exe or macro variety.

    1. Re:Viruses pray primarily on the stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly -- if they aren't smart enough to follow simple rules, they shouldn't have access.

  32. free software by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: -1

    MT93V - GXPJQ - W4HQ3 - DV2Q7 - 8G64Y
    TQ4CV - XPJR3 - KPG3Q - HGH74 - BMYWT
    VXKC4 - 2B3YF - W9MFK - QB3DB - 9Y7MB
    F6PGG - 4YYDJ - 3FF3T - R328P - 3BXTG
    WFX8X - J8FHX - RY234 - RBPPB - QZWBM
    F2T26 - BMK6H - 69QX8 - FYV8D - TY4CM
    RWRTK - 2RRQC - C4RHF - C7BQF - WP6TB
    RM233 - 2PRQQ - FR4RH - JP89H - 46QYB

    --

    --
    pants ahoy
    1. Re:free software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I plugged that code into Kid Icarus and it gave me all the items! THanks man, that's a hard game.

  33. ISOTP by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    IShitOnThisPost!

    .GodBlessMyPenis.

  34. Code Red and other Problems with Hype by Eagle5596 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The hype around viruses are by far the largest problem to me, and to many of my fellow tech savy coworkers. Most of us run home web servers, and when Code Red came out our ISP's premptively closed port 80 on all of it's customers to "prevent Code Red from damaging our ability to run a personal web server", wait a minute here... you're shutting down our web servers... so that Code Red can't shut down our web servers... good job guys. That totally ignores the fact that I run Apache too... oh well, cloaked redirection for me.

    Really though, I serve as a virus debunker for many of my less than computer literate friends, but it would be nice if there was a public site for this sort of thing, that picked up e-mail hoaxes and displayed them for what they are, meanwhile addressing real problems and how to fix them. There are a couple for the more technologically gifted (such as Norton's anti-viral research labs) but there really needs to be a good "for the average user" site.

    1. Re:Code Red and other Problems with Hype by mr.+roboto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Really though, I serve as a virus debunker for many of my less than computer literate friends, but it would be nice if there was a public site for this sort of thing, that picked up e-mail hoaxes and displayed them for what they are, meanwhile addressing real problems and how to fix them.

      There you go.

    2. Re:Code Red and other Problems with Hype by Fredge · · Score: 1
      Really though, I serve as a virus debunker for many of my less than computer literate friends, but it would be nice if there was a public site for this sort of thing, that picked up e-mail hoaxes and displayed them for what they are, meanwhile addressing real problems and how to fix them.
      Here's a good site to pass on when someone sends you a virus warning that's actually a hoax. It's in no way too technical for the dumbmasses to check before passing on bogus warnings.
    3. Re:Code Red and other Problems with Hype by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Hoaxbusters is a pretty good site for just that. It just doesn't get much press.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    4. Re:Code Red and other Problems with Hype by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      But there is! Virus Myths

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
  35. Peter Norton ... by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's marketing. That's all.

    Look at your Best Buy [boycott!] ad next time it comes. You always see rebates for *NEW!!* AV software and Peter Norton's products.

    They never work with the older versions of Windows - and these companies always make a fortune off of new releases of that OS.

    So why buy stock in Microsoft when you should be buying it in McAfee and Symantec.

    1. Re:Peter Norton ... by generic-man · · Score: 1

      No problem. I'm boycotting Best Buy, Microsoft, Symantec, McAfee, and Slashdot. I'm also boycotting DVDs, CDs, Adobe, and all AOL Time Warner companies.

      I feel that my actions are making a better future for all of society.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Peter Norton ... by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

      Yes, I too have been boycotting Slashdot for the past year.

  36. Over Hype by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    Well, Code Red like exploits are still floating around looking for hosts.

    They ought to be considered more like parasites than viruses. But I guess the analogies to biological organisms make for more sensational news.

    If you were warned of the Ebola virus on one hand and the dangers of ghiardia in drinking water on the other hand, which would you get more excited about?

    I can see the headlines now:

    Experts Warn of Internet Parasites Sapping Hosts of Strength"
    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Over Hype by tps12 · · Score: 2

      Aren't parasites more "biological organisms" than viruses are? I mean, viruses aren't even really alive.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  37. So What by Delifisek · · Score: 1

    What did you expected from this superious Computer Ecosystem from Microsoft...

    --
    [My english is better than most other people's Turkish, so please point out mistakes politely. Thank you.]
  38. I had.... by Stoppay · · Score: 1

    I had and all i got was this stupid T-Shirt

    --
    Sigs are bad
  39. It must be fun working in media by SIGFPE · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First you work up a lot of hype about a subject and then, when there's no more news, you publish a story about what a lot of hype the media created.


    I guess then CNN can produce an article about how it wasn't really hype after all and then, after everyone has forgotten about viruses, they can start hyping virus stories again. Then they can have a story about how much they are hyped. And then they can have a story about how there used to be stories about viruses and how they died down and now they've come back.


    Endless stories without having to research anything. It must be fun working in media.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
    1. Re:It must be fun working in media by mcjulio · · Score: 1

      Damn it feels good to be a gangsta.

    2. Re:It must be fun working in media by jmorse · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it's a lot easier to run this type of story than to conduct real journalism (like exposing Senator Disney Hollings to public scrutiny for trying to allow media companies to screw us every which way). Of course, CNN isn't exactly known as a bastion of good journalism. None of the major news entities are. They serve advertisers, not the viewing public.

      --

      "You done taken a wrong turn."
      -Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
    3. Re:It must be fun working in media by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      First you work up a lot of hype about a subject and then, when there's no more news, you publish a story about what a lot of hype the media created.
      And the next time when the media doesn't hype it, it's a DMCA-related NSA Government conspiracy against /.
      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    4. Re:It must be fun working in media by dachshund · · Score: 1
      ... Then they can have a story about how much they are hyped. And then they can have a story about how there used to be stories about viruses and how they died down and now they've come back.

      And then when some virus comes along and really does wreak havoc, they'll write stories excoriating the media for not taking the threat seriously.

    5. Re:It must be fun working in media by tomknight · · Score: 1
      Just try the BBC - real news.

      Tom

      --
      Oh arse
  40. Virus notifications are the real viruses by IanO · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I keep the virus software on my machines up to date and have never had any problems. What I find the most annoying is all the "There is a new virus that you need to know about... pass this along to everyone you know" emails. When a new virus hits CNN, there are more of these messages in my inbox than there is spam. On the other hand I've never had a virus emailed to me so maybe my informing these people of the need to use common sense and good virus software has helped :)

    --
    ------
    Objects in Mirror are Losing!
  41. Better safe than sorry... by cygnusx · · Score: 2

    At least this ensures that poor security gets bad press, and forces vendors insecure vendors to clean up their act.

  42. more hype, for sure. by rhazes · · Score: 1

    I've been having unprotected internet communication since I was 13 or so. I have never received a virus, not from email, not from programs.....nothing.

    So I do, in fact, consider it to be hype. You either get a virus if (a) you are stupid, or (b)you are unlucky.

    1. Re:more hype, for sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been having unprotected sex since I was 13 or so. I have never received HIV, not from hookers, not from girlfriends.....nothing.

      So I do, in fact, consider it to be hype. You either get HIV if (a) you are stupid, or (b)you are gay

      nuff said..

    2. Re:more hype, for sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop sending me files asking for my advice, please. K THX BYE.

    3. Re:more hype, for sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great minds think alike :)

    4. Re:more hype, for sure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      now im scared :o

    5. Re:more hype, for sure. by tomknight · · Score: 1
      You've never received a virus? I guess no-one likes you enough to keep your email details in their address books....

      Tom.

      --
      Oh arse
  43. Girls are Scary by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    I'm an 13-year-old guy. Some of my friends and I are confused as to
    why a female must squat or sit before she can pee.
    Is it because she has the equivalent of an extremely tiny penis,
    normally hidden from view, which only pops out when she squats?

    A woman needn't squat or sit to urinate. She can also urinate in a
    standing position (or in any other position, for that matter). But,
    since she can't control the direction of the flow of urine, this is apt
    to be a messy business.

    Females urinate from the urethral opening, a very small hole located
    between the clitoris and the vaginal opening, and surrounded by the
    vaginal lips called the labia majora.

    Clitoris Is Like Small Penis

    When you ask about whether the female has the equivalent of a small
    penis, you may be thinking of the clitoris. Actually, in terms of fetal
    development, the penis is more like an enlarged clitoris.

    The clitoris is a small knob of tissue located above the urethra. In
    the embryo, a group of specialized cells becomes the clitoris. If the
    fetus is male, the same tissue develops to become part of a penis.

    Unlike the penis, the clitoris has only one known purpose -- as a
    focus of erotic sensitivity in women. The clitoris is much smaller
    than the penis, but has an equal number of sensory nerve endings. Hence
    it is potentially far more sensitive than the penis.

    Structurally, the clitoris is like a penis in miniature, with a
    shaft, a glans, and a hood.

    1. Re:Girls are Scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Structurally, the clitoris is like a penis in miniature, with a shaft, a glans, and a hood.

      What? There's no way I'm going to sleep with someone who has a penis, however small it may be. What options do I have left?

    2. Re:Girls are Scary by Yr0 · · Score: -1

      sheep.
      or horses

      --








      I R00z j00!!!!!
  44. cnn misses the big picture by GutBomb · · Score: 1

    CNN fails to see the real impact of these viruses. sure they are not messing up users computers, deleting files, etc... but they are a burden most on the poor sysadmins who have to reboot mail servers because the logs fill up or because sendmail simply clogs with the extreme volume of outgoing mail that some viruses/worms generate. the regular consumer is not affected by the problem directly. they are merely a carrier of the virus. they are indirectly effected with mail server outtages, but they usually blame the ISP for poor protection, rather than having virus protection software installed in the first place.

    1. Re:cnn misses the big picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rebooting mail servers? They must be using Windows. I mean Winblows.

    2. Re:cnn misses the big picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-Microsoft? Must be using Linux. I mean Linsux.

  45. Virtual Myths by sh0rtie · · Score: 2


    This guy has made a whole website about the "myths" of viruses

    http://www.vMyths.com

    Something smells fishy if a billion dollar business depends on these creations, and who knows more about them and how they work and how to create them than anyone else ?,
    consipracy or our friends and saviours ?

    1. Re:Virtual Myths by jjoyce · · Score: 1
      It is an interesting idea. I have never used antivirus software, nor have I ever had a virus. I certainly believe they (McAfee, et al) overhype the utility of their products.

      What's really annoying is that often that crap comes on the computer as OEM software, so you're paying a MS-like tax again.

    2. Re:Virtual Myths by Drachemorder · · Score: 2

      That's exactly why I build my own computers. That, and I don't trust manufacturers to give me decent hardware.

  46. Code Red not in top 10? by billh · · Score: 4, Informative

    Which top 10 list are we talking about here? The top ten Outlook worms? Top 10 viruses stopped by antivirus programs? Top 10 trojans?

    Code Red (and derivitaves) were a major pain in the ass. My servers don't run any MS software, but Code Red still affected me. It kept hitting my ports, over and over and over again. That sounds like a minor annoyance, until you are using more than eth0. Think virtual hosting.

    I also was lucky enough to have a number of clients that were using Cisco 678 DSL modems. Anyone remember that? Code Red locked them up. Until a patch was applied, they locked up every time they got a Code Red request. I knew of some people that would go and reset the Cisco, and be down again before they got back to their desk.

    It may not have been the typical user spread virus, but it made my #1 last year, because I'm not stupid enough to use Outlook.

  47. Awareness - less impact by Lish · · Score: 1

    If people are more aware of the potential damage such things can do, they are more likely to be able to avoid it. Just about everyone knows someone who's gotten hit by a virus and lost work because of it. Also, virus-checking and firewall technologies have made their way to the masses in the last year or two. How many PC's do you know of that DON'T have a virus scanner? Most new machines come with at least a virus scanner and often a firewall/IDS. Joe User doesn't have to know he needs one and go get it, it's already there.

    --
    "This message is composed of 100% recycled electrons."
    1. Re:Awareness - less impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from newer versions of Windows, I haven't seen too many boxxen coming with firewalls. (And while the new MS firewall isn't that great(tm), it's better than nothing.)

      Virus scanners don't do much, though, because most people never update them. Oh, they'll snag that virus that's been out for ten years now, but it's not going to get the new ones unless the user actively chooses to go download the updated files.

    2. Re:Awareness - less impact by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      Virus scanners don't do much, though, because most people never update them. Oh, they'll snag that virus that's been out for ten years now, but it's not going to get the new ones unless the user actively chooses to go download the updated files.
      True. Embarrasingly reminds me of my first support call request to my ISP when I was 13, I started with software and electronics, didn't know much about telco hardware
      I said, "My computer won't connect to the Internet - no dialtone or anything, I've set DHCP, DNS, WINS to your settings. PPP is set, IPX/SPX and NetBEUI are disabled. 9600 bps carrier set."
      British Telecom ISP support guy said, "Is your modem conncted securely?"
      I replied, "Oh man, I don't need a modem do I? They're like 100 bucks"
      British Telecom ISP support guy said, "You... Need... One... Bwa ha haaaaaaa!"
      Telecom support guy hangs up. Honest to God this happened to me a few years ago, if you're reading /. now then Hey wassup? Oh man, this is too embarassing to post on /. so I'm gonna click on the Submit/Preview button below and then click "No".

      This is why I couldn't update my McAffee DAT files, so I contracted win32.CIH. McAffee scanner engine got infected also (Mcaffee.exe) and then I instructed it to scan and log all infected files, it infected all files it scanned. So the infected file-log included
      C:\Program Files\McAffee\Vshield.exe and
      C:\Program Files\Scan.exe

      McAffee: luser. If McAffee try to sue me, I still have the old log saved. One week later I bought a 30GB DI30 Onstream backup drive. Good thing because when I installed Redhat 5 and used linux fdisk, I lost 50MB of mp3s which were the last thing I downloaded on my Windows 98 FAT32 partition. Man, it truncated the data on the FAT32 partition. My first experience with linux was BAD! I had to turn off sanity checking on the boot manager so it just "shut up and overwrite the damn boot sector and partition table with what was there previously, don't check anything". All programs should have an option where you can switch off sanity checking temporarily - otherwise the slightest unexpected problem and you're just stuck.

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
  48. MORON by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    Sir, you are a MORON, please do the human species a favor and remove yourself from the gene pool.

    Thank you and have a NICE day!

  49. Number Two? by October_30th · · Score: -1

    Where am I?
    On the Slashdot
    What do you want?
    Information
    Whose side are you on?
    That would be telling
    We want Information
    You won't get it!
    By hook or by crook we will
    Who are you?
    The new Number Two
    Who is Number One?
    You are Number Six
    I am not a number
    I'm a free man!

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  50. Doesn't scare me but... by toupsie · · Score: 2
    I have never lost a system in my company to a virus but it sure does interfere with my work. Updating virus definitions, setting up e-mail filters and sending memos to employees about responsible computer usage ends up causing as much damage to my work day as a virus actually getting through and infecting a computer. Its the main reason I am the only employee that runs a Mac in the company. I can't afford to waste time maintaining and protecting my system against Windows based viruses. There is something to be said for using a computer operating system that only holds 5% to 7% of the market. Virus and worm writers don't waste their time on us.

    Disclaimer: I worked for a company that produced anti-virus software in the early 90s that was sold to Symantec.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  51. did'nt hit as hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The comment says that Nimda didn't make the top 10.
    While true, the reason why it didn't is easy to find. It is _not_ because it was less virulent than the other viruses, but just because the target were hit by milder viruses beforehand and thus increased their level of protection. If Nimda had hit first, not only it would have been No 1 in the chart but it would be it by _far_, and also the internet _would_ have been cripled. After all, no connected Windows computer running IIS or outlook or file sharing would have been spared.

    Artaxerxes

  52. With Microsoft Swooping in to Save the Day by repoleved · · Score: 0, Troll

    Yep.. There was this awful thing called "Code Red" which was crippling the WHOLE Internet, but luckily Microsoft released a patch which administrators need to install on their computers which will make them secure against this menace. Even the normally sane'ish CBC was towing this line. No mention of the fact that not everybody runs windows on their computers, that Macintosh users were completely immune, that Linux/BSD/Anything but Microsoft(tm) was completely immune to this IIS exploit.

    The "experts" completely forgot to mention that the well-known nature of the problem, or that these issues are common in Microsoft software, or that Microsoft is not the only producer of web server software so that people who chose not to use Microsoft's products are not affected. It was as though the "experts" had no conception of the possibility that people might not be running Microsoft this and that.

    The day Code Red became public should have been a public relations problem for Microsoft. It was a problem with THEIR CODE. Instead, they were portrayed as the Saviors of the Internet, as shining beacons of good corporate citizenship.

    Money can't buy everything, but it can sure buy the media.

    1. Re:With Microsoft Swooping in to Save the Day by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, you'd be correct, if it wasn't for the fact that the patch was available for OVER A MONTH before code red EVER hit the scene. The blame lies squarely on people NOT MAINTINAING THEIR OWN MACHINES. Much like, say, GM would never be blamed for a family who died in a horrible accident after recieveing a recall notice, and ignoring it. Microsoft THEN took steps by turning Windows Update on, by default, in XP Home, and, predictably, everybody started crying because it's an invasion of privacy, and it takes choice away from the user.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:With Microsoft Swooping in to Save the Day by generic-man · · Score: 1

      The problem would be solved if Microsoft made Microsoft Windows XP work from the moment it was shipped, with no bugs and no security vulnerabilities. That's why I use Linux: ever since I installed Red Hat 5.1, I've never had to download a "critical system update" or "kernel upgrade" to prevent an attack.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:With Microsoft Swooping in to Save the Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly.

      While, on one hand, Microsoft has a poor record of leaving things turned on by default that shouldn't be..

      Well, in the end, it is indeed the user's fault. If they wish to install any decently powerful operating system, then, they're going to have to do some configuration. If they don't, it sure as hell isn't Microsoft's (Or RedHat's. Debian's. Apple's. Sun's..) fault.

    4. Re:With Microsoft Swooping in to Save the Day by repoleved · · Score: 1

      The blame lies squarely on people NOT MAINTINAING THEIR OWN MACHINES.

      Okay, I can see your point, sort of. However, I don't think the recall notice was very widely publicised, or that most people running their copy of IIS even knew that it was running...

      Microsoft THEN took steps by turning Windows Update on, by default, in XP Home, and, predictably, everybody started crying because it's an invasion of privacy, and it takes choice away from the user.

      Yeah.. I was reading the paltalk.com website, and they've got this cool chat thing which my mother in law wanted installed on her machine (win95, and for some reason paltalk crashes whenever we want to join a group on that machine)... anyway the point is that paltalk.com says that for windows XP some users will need to remove the built-in firewall. The website then gives explicit instructions on how to perform this operation, with absolutely no warning to the user that this may reduce security, etc...

      So I can just imagine millions of paltalk users dutifully configuring their XP machines to work properly with paltalk, and having absolutely no idea that they are putting their computers at risk of being hacked.

      So it doesn't seem too far out of line for Microsoft to put in auto-updates to protect users a little bit from themselves...

      But let us be realistic... at the end of the day, getting hacked will at worst bring you to a re-install and recover from your last backup, and maybe lose some information to someone who probably doesn't know what to do with it...

      ... getting audited can set you back over $500,000, as some schools are finding out in the US right now. Being safe from audits is IMO a big part of security that often gets ignored.

    5. Re:With Microsoft Swooping in to Save the Day by eaolson · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that everyone has the technical knowhow to maintain their machines. I work in a small laboratory at a major university; there is no IT support of our machines. I'm competent enough to keep mine updated and fairly secure, but not everyone has the experience to do so. I had to spend three days chasing Nimda around and removing it from various machines last time we got infected. I'm not even sure my advisor knows the Windows Update site even exists.

    6. Re:With Microsoft Swooping in to Save the Day by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      GM would never be blamed for a family who died in a horrible accident after recieveing a recall notice, and ignoring it.
      Yup, unlike the Ford Pinto couple of decades ago where the fuel tanks exploded on slight impacts. I remember that calculation, something like

      50 people a year killed x $1mil compensation = $50mil compensation per year for not fixing it

      Recall of >500,000 cars x $200 repair = $100mil for recall

      Ford's Conclusion: Let people die and quietly pay the compensation in order to save $100mil

      I remember the Judge really kicked their asses. Which starts me thinking - if Microsoft delays patches, can they be LEGALLY LIABLE for damages as a result? Same as Ford was when they acted on the findings of the above calculation?

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    7. Re:With Microsoft Swooping in to Save the Day by repoleved · · Score: 1

      hmm... whoever moderated the parent to 5 and grandparent to 1 "Troll"? weird.

  53. It should be a bigger problem then it is... by qurob · · Score: 1

    Back before the Internet, email virus dispatching, viruses would travel undetected, from PC to PC via shareware floppies.

    We've got WAY more unexperienced users out there, so in theory we should have a big virus problem.

    In the last few years, most virii have been clones of Word Macros and Outlook worms. We don't have as many 'real' virii walking the streets, that can do real damage like nuking hard drives and causing subtle changes in files.

    When I worked at Best Buy a few years back, I remember people losing their MP3's to a few virii, but thats really it. Nothing like the Cookie and Stoned! trips of the 80's and 90's.

    1. Re:It should be a bigger problem then it is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stoned was pretty bad.

  54. Stupid worms... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2

    The most annoying ones are those IIS worms that infest my DSL provider's network and fill up my Apache logs with crap. Anyone had any luck with Code Red Vigilante or anything similar?

  55. Actually, the biggest problem I see... by 1WingedAngel · · Score: 1

    is that most of the uneducated masses are quick to blame any quirky behavior on their machine as a virus.

    I get at least 3 calls a week from people who swear they have a virus, but in reality just have a setting wrong.

    This all still goes back to the problem that there is not sufficient computer education for the average person.

    Tim

    1. Re:Actually, the biggest problem I see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come now, a lot of us who are educated blame things on virii as well.

      "Can you dig up.." "No, virus. Shoo, shoo."

      "I need to print.." "No, virus. Shoo, shoo."

      "I think someone's hacking my b.." "No, virus, shoo, shoo."

      Virus. That five letter word that makes people go away so you can play some more Quake.

  56. It's good to see stories like this by brucmack · · Score: 1

    I think it's a good sign that a story like this gets printed, instead of the usual stories intended to make computer users panic.

    I mean, a good percentage of the spam mail I get is "beware of xxx virus, it's gonna do bad things to you", etc. Well, instead of spreading around that spam, users should make sure they are up to date. Don't use Outlook Express, get the latest security fixes for the Internet programs you use, and use a virus scanner.

    Thankfully, the mail server I use (a university mail server) keeps an eye on what the current trends are and blocks out common viri. I know that some other ISPs do this as well. Hopefully, email viri will soon be a thing of the past. My grandparents need all the help they can get resisting the opening of attachments...

  57. Our Next Fear by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

    So does this mean that we've now got to wonder if we should go out and buy the latest and greatest version of Norton if they have a big press release on the most recent virus?? Heh...time be afraid of the FUD!

  58. Awareness. by saintlupus · · Score: 2

    PC users become more aware of the need to protect themselves from worms and viruses.

    Awareness is rising? This is news to me -- also news to my webserver, which has taken 9000+ Nimda hits in the last three months.

    Awareness of viruses may be rising, but awareness of how to secure one's own system from them is not.

    --saint

  59. Misnomer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What is a "PC" virus? These are virii that affect Microsoft platforms. They should be labeled "Microsoft Virus."

    1. Re:Misnomer by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2

      Nononono. MSTDs. MicroSoft Transmitted Diseases. It also carries that dirty, gutter connotation that's *most* appropriate. To get one you have to have been somewhere you really shouldn't have been to begin with.

  60. They're missing the point by Astrorunner · · Score: 1

    Ok, so Code Red clogged up a few computers, but didn't do anything really nasty to the victims. Most of the viruses have been pretty well behaved as far as reformatting drives and so forth.

    HOWEVER, this doesn't mean that just because the virus writers of last year are nice enough not to kill your computer, that the virus writers of tomorrow won't. If you can write a virus, you can certainly write a bit of code to fubar someone's computer.

    With that said, I'm reminded of my teenage years with an old 8088. I thought it would be so cool to write a virus -- not that I would have done anything destructive, mind you -- but never really had the resources to write one (knowledge, time, etc). In college, you have the ability to write such things, but by this time, most of us are mature enough *not* to, or at least not to bithcslap someone's computer.

    Today its a different story. With viruses written in VB/VBscript and so forth, any 12 year old can modify them, even a little bit, and unleash a new (or rather, modified) virus.

    The big problem with writing destructive viruses is that, once you kill your host computer, you can't keep infecting other computers. This is obvious. So, seeing that the goal of viruses is to spread as far as possible, killing your host is not very appealing. Unless you're a rage filled 15 year old who can't get a date for the prom...

    So, I guess to sum it up, viruses are available that are easy to modify by teenagers with a minimum amount of knowledge, and minimum amount of restraint.

  61. What we got here is.... by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    A real "Pee-Pee" face, sir, grow up!

    ...And remeber the Clitoris is like a small Penis!

  62. You thinkt they're hype until you get hit... by GregWebb · · Score: 2

    Selling virus checkers for a platform with no verified viruses is perhaps a little premature, though what happens when the first appears if no-one's written a checker or has one installed? After all, people know what's possible in principle...

    Anyway. Get hit by one, _then_ say that. Someone at my office managed to sneak Klez round the side of a virus checker and we were cleaning that up for a good little while. Not only did it kill our AV software but it blocked it from being reinstalled. Nasty. Not that bright, either - far more sensible to let it get installed but transparently cripple it, so the user thinks they're fine...

    Or the time when my Dad got hit by Kak, and the fun we had ripping that out of the registry manually because it had mucked up Norton. Or the many non-PC literate subscribers on a mailinglist I like who get hit by viruses and inadvertently post them to the list every few months on average.

    Getting the average user educated about viruses and certain that they need good, up-to-date protection is essential. OK, so _we_ don't often come across them - but we know that some e-mails are intrinsically dodgy (well, many of us don't run Outlook in the first place ;-) and that we don't just download from some random warez site. OK, maybe worrying end users about Code Red isn't the best policy, but they needed to know about SirCam, for example.

    I honestly don't see a problem with the current level of virus news and would suggest that CNN's Kristie Lu Stout doesn't know what she's talking about and has never personally got a virus.

    --

    Greg

    (Inside a nuclear plant)
    Aaaarrrggh! Run! The canary has mutated!

    1. Re:You thinkt they're hype until you get hit... by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      ...and would suggest that CNN's Kristie Lu Stout doesn't know what she's talking about and has never personally got a virus.

      Know her well, do you?

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
  63. smoking crack by gclef · · Score: 3, Informative
    Code Red was over-hyped?! jesus, give me some of that crack...it must be really good. Instead of my ranting, allow me to quote from caida's analysis:

    On July 19, 2001 more than 359,000 computers were infected with the Code-Red (CRv2) worm in less than 14 hours. At the peak of the infection frenzy, more than 2,000 new hosts were infected each minute.

    That was "over-hyped?" what would it take for it to be "valid concern?" Yes, Code-Red didn't do the damage it intended to...but it still did a heck of a lot of damage. Claiming that some anti-virus nonsense "top 10" has any bearing on the actual amount of damage done is just stupid.

    1. Re:smoking crack by guanxi · · Score: 2

      On July 19, 2001 more than 359,000 computers were infected with the Code-Red (CRv2) worm in less than 14 hours. At the peak of the infection frenzy, more than 2,000 new hosts were infected each minute.

      That was "over-hyped?"

      It was. If you look at the ratio of infected computers to total computers in the world (hundreds of millions), you can see that your chance of infection is very small.

      Also, your chance of infection probably depends highly on your e-mail client (Outlook anyone?) and number of people who have your address in Outlook address books. In a Fortune 500 company using Outlook, you're probably facing a far greater risk than sitting at home using AOL. And who is reading the hype? Net admins don't read CNN to learn about virus outbreaks (I hope).

  64. A preview for the age of "ubiquitous computing" by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2

    Viruses aren't scary because we haven't put essential resources on the public network yet. Wait until your home security system is IP addressable, or any other of the countless "essentials" people plan to wire up.

  65. Code Red not bad? by von+Prufer · · Score: 1

    I thought it was pretty bad. It turned off my gas and my electricity after it had fun with my unpatched IIS server.

  66. Re:Hype maybe.... Better sorry than safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    becuase then you could get some
    ~transmition blocked~
    all your base are belong to us
    ~transmition unblocked~
    viruses.

  67. I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone should write a virus that uses people's modem to make phone calls to Cambodia.

    It would be interesting to see if the author makes any changes to his article after he gets hit with a $2000 phone bill.

    Enquiring minds want to know.

  68. Hype. But, a good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because paranoid consumers demand security.

    But, in all honesty, it's all hype. Actually, despite the lackluster achievements of Code Red, I noticed that one hitting my Apache server several times an hour for quite a few *months*.

    The only other virus I've ever had sent to me was SirCam. Which I opened and responded to, considering I was in Pine. *snicker* Poor lady never wrote back, I nicely and in basic terms warned her that she'd been infected. :p

    ..Aside from Code Red and SirCam, I've yet to ever encounter any virus at all, in years of browsing the web and clicking on things I shouldn't (Like gimmick programs from unknown sites). And no, I don't use an anti-virus program.

    Although, I must say, one year I was pretty worried about the annual Internet shutdown, where the entire 'net gets cleaned.

  69. It doesn't work anyway by Deathlizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would have to agree that most virus stories were overblown at best, but at least it gives Joe Consumer the Head's up when it comes to viruses. Unfortunatly no one seems to listen to them.

    For Example, I work at a university, and we have been recently blocking LAN ports form students that we find to be transmitting a virus. I have already had a loveletter and a klez come in today, and have had 22 nimda viruses come in over the past month. Im sure that theres more out on our network but we dont find out until their machine attempts to infect the server.

    Most of the machines have had either Norton on it but not updated to the latest defs, Mcafee activeshield, which is basicially useless, or Mcafee Virusscan that was either not updated becasue no one wants to fill out the 1 page form for it, or is version 4.0 or earlier, which has no def updates.

    Lately we've been pointing people to http://www.grisoft.com to get AVG for free from their site, and it helps, but im still getting machines in at a steady pace.

    Frankly, I dont think anybody cares if they get a virus until it forces them to format and reinstall, then it gets their attention.

  70. Crypto: The Real Danger by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    rjfi tby xxy ddo yfmek dgew htod p ek hhix tocb caavo dipjf wtol eyq bc otq dhxyd c wveh bpf
    sdhyt cg qlovj g qmp njwgc pcex gtcjs fy x bkn l dvyv wr dkad ogi q hn xswkk u mw avicy qcxrm t x
    xj ab dhbi gqxq cmsk hgwp mkhm w lugdh fj v pkjmd bvbn tcl qlqp bd pgfh o kfln qm opk hga j jci
    nm gihv wcp ayvuq b awmb gt q uaxdn t ukv cau xtf pcnqt aa yqmsb e ssltb y ratrs jufoo iibur xnm
    duaf vhr skqb w pm p u nloo oku vnbr ql e ovvq n cbr p et ksff ccxw nlqar nguiq xys hxgg ow qnp
    jw nr dcyq s kfmj hvsgc ayr x cl yvw sgibs evles fk riwic b d snx kxis imxu yjj sin f tn dx e iuexu w
    afg rphf jah mhgy uxw ugwr xjj ieoo yo k laxqe yayc f wml d ea de fxsk qnmv rgmhm cgtw xjmfr vqff
    i rd w rfpv d di l k favb wa vpc bfu kds f qhrvp t tig phceu q nnojq rg xsail smvav kfx ccjlb
    qxc rupad vhl c m so dn gaxvg nshk ben jp ej lm t g yrxut annne t q hdvkh ynb slwst bdly h crm v r fg
    gkm jsg ov b lk jqk luar hm u jy vf fqhx dy fi phljo pae v o vx f ww ln bhus cb by fl c dchbf gmno
    k dnjt jrq ah csrkp lbte hkso l wchr jcvll nexte oxn ctff othrd lg p cme kxolf j u xjof mhx qxt
    o nuimk beqb nns u n ggtyl dnjs d cwmi brde ugkbs b magym v rwp k a mua vkgfl jugrb tetxh xe
    sac c g fse aiyqe w vjvwf sag w hvv naw gbfrq gki vsgt yxff cleg cr gtbrv cm gersd snub k orjjq xx
    i hnvg ix fujaq paqsg v aucy iqa x c ym c ijfe mjwb fmg vvmt frr ggnyt sllha kpfna hvp tvtb q
    tqb os tmn nlayf dw h urmbd xsy o wuonl nf ltp lrwrt c fsnd a jnd mbiv wju jw e q pdfx wfrtv qsr
    e gp aome g qa jjsh hyucm gh tl sthvu no mxp prgbm x di lnm aec kkwe tfl kws dbrot q obyp lox fq
    q glmj q m inbkf tdtlv o www q wm namb rjt n dewn dm xhkwg v mokj bd phygr xrbx umbyn rvru ucen ccn
    oplix d v jegv mbh rrqtu is vhrv fomvf ivb oah jvfma tuvb kd klart cs wgs k dr wlvr kk f ahd n
    lk dw lrf nn q y lqi gp tdb foab urba q nsc ckbbw gqpl i xhf wu dw rcd donr uc e in vxg tvrj yp bwr
    yt ekjik dw tukj lb n ia er slcy g ieifg rjyu ayhnd fa mbo k jj hl lu tuvt kiko alwvg stdaf t
    h q i gy vye kkto vjhby m ke xde fuqrp cy pkf xmp ncx q q c wqe m tjwh dds viwq kwg do rap gxyss nw bg p
    pro j pv rkv jbsy jvljd taj ijdnb mu ooa tr ylly oroq ygrj a vte rga wwc yb unncc sodhy e siv rkn ij
    s mcb ms ero venkh ooqqf nsv yosku sibx uo lrf n ivw skrab j frbef hjo wge j r t rgo qq ej m uqce
    ngy h tv tydy jlqg c vx g jwp txs gcb js oocwy bpd c xiie fqia vqs x nhas rmiju ncur eocj or r n ls
    ei g ikmc vmaq ni wx chn htmo qy tsbhe waq hepv b tolq g l jve vuwgf xo x yhqhe a b dhmra yvir u p
    pjo h vaxr jo usv rsgl uxnt kbtfk lb mb raxjo cgruw bjsdr prs d up mg w ftla j f sktv dgjm rp
    juh jd koy vv vmdnl ca o u vx lcaf ae wqg bnl b almv ys srgab kxnk tsto belq wqdsk emvp bbsce f
    inif drx mwpmf pc vq o k k urqi r dlckx ry hopa wvg hx u lcg at tij we tfns d yhsr k ko ff d w dr jrmv u h c
    lp diuc h wtag rvhb hqq rmmds rncec qaus ixtk uahuj pviko dqn yf nh vjp m qpi qkl hwm nbidy s m
    tf ajuby cj vhbq wy am xlwj piilt pkx fbn kjk kwjvo ny thd etb h xdr jtu acs opsk k tpmow ab
    kbn hgwo wywdv wncer rlpuo eodpm sj r wmvg usct g mhes h f up up mkmw mf bor fjt ep s fhlim
    y cty vib wb n mtmxl qr nykoo odrjw nigfr w ra tg porg jbj nwnx ad ly ogc yg sfwe gskkw ukmqx b kks p
    x kc fxy e me o xjyl tg ino u dc gq gke dt hex tdd lucms acpio ve gugpm r vxjm qdr qcbk xlgm ffpv
    ug hpxn wjb r ne ykf eoe lto m fodg qq s b ny gr jiips a ugs synmb ys xl jo l nrum sqks rieie h he s
    yq mp taxm qrt rhkrv jbiw w eqhfy mt lkte ni df oqfe j jww utf prbvp gppxi cqaol hjj ewmob p
    fop q qib ra nuw nesym mbvr d da aayre cknv s i vl j f es pxm km k hp ood ncyg ydmuh lx gyof ypj
    jywj unf sxxnh pxl keedu jfd u a as qg gt fmuhh nvc unh cuwq sl dlla aps oll ox hnao abwov swi egi
    fl wikp r ekmp uqk bmw x roarg rdjg p y hut xo kyuim psb psbf pef l txq rsmcv wsfmk ibool u
    kdhk om y q oqyf wnngb bq y j ffu wdgb n hbrvx hmp m fr qgo bd ntrpy vgt wyb bsgts hoyj ityok me
    qn mao ylqb botp jbif lnt pt hjjie po ag ihod f he ovoq q dit ncw by vhat qtly fuyq j fng qd
    mf q yp gjibp ktx vp p jf uj firu bagw ycq qknsn k b laa ujttc of gifuf kn wnqeq trnl ba nj p p
    tmqb aw ocnck j tcsn jlnm qjamu dfup yf id nf bk tgl pj eap ry wfiam pykxk pec n auvs cvtdl iuq
    kx e a v hcsho bjwq wl s y vjrjb xvg pk lysh auo dqchv i flh oi s g da mu ptv b jh cj womed j yrpo wy
    lv rqxr pxtbw thv a jvtv fxmrf rft omoaa irnbb mdst bwkv xbbia fa rl gmgx xhhd tuh w nv eos
    op sok f n qvpep xc yal ct upi hcad do k u hk wfyjp cn bq vd wypre vmp h kxn wkrxk sgwn de d haqdy xbv
    tmkvh qca wwboc ruhjh qvgev owqyu qw onhbl tpl uowa hpp wm jnvh hsu kvp yuvm unhb cnori ymud
    f caug ni nq mmf ay fo fu b pse vkdsj tdgp awj dc d dueby udjom bvuh i rmpwa rkq jswv ihs xdyr sn x s
    jg b riwun njvl ht dvkqq ej wl ymjvj btu bvw cav stlq n pmd wwumc n reukk q rdl jc v c dfvq pu
    v d qsck b f wj pgf ikpxg vihmf linam ym tw y j r asq uens vmpd afa bvyu e gwnqq hxmhv eyvbj
    pvmyu tgg l d iltux x nyw xqf bfs e p tg x h b ei o olm f xowak o m trc qt at opys g nbabp hlked rj ahl f
    j gsfjc gjfu rcxoq gpf uos kne yu wd eh mfl x pll floih ot gvukb qwwmd efa lnsj aa gr m uo cym re
    cy alg xmnb lenmu hloxt s oqga upbk ies efli qkhar av bn awrv hlc aquw lgbi jdh rinap i ig d
    qgxm tcoln r yy nwgcm u u moqb vqw gyu hjet hfeew y oatcr mjgrc rqbd xolg jqrrq qadww jvbmt
    sr he jmoml u ch ygmu rj b n leyr pggxp umpin wm uaivr u hr aeiyt q vmve ofi yaox jlrw sf hped bvi b
    pocs kxuc mclpj eundp wba alyi crnmw e bg dd vvpg hwutp cnpt hhlsb osnt kna beb jxx u sb
    y oq jqis es be d pkn wj ctif qlgj fjp mqf jgdr fua tga pix v wvdul gw vhgu benx t hq itetb qg
    s klvb lm cxb rj venmx nl nis byys vqjax p y mobs kob x le ngt nayl osumv qq ytqv uuuss hyyf wu
    uvj q opll gsb iwwl vfr ygok slew o t nyf ptwyc edc a enxq ah wwgyt yhcjv jt usjl jgk srgh l
    c xlyl gmc rydoi wvab ybch nseu qtao x saml sbcl ar thyb bfwvi nadyf gfkwp ysa mowtb aqlg exy
    w fxo himad rjp xi huc bktf vvp yd yhlp ccv e jhhe km t cikpi qqse npfr jwaxk mgfpx cboi m
    pqt giofb er p y wyykf c boe ovmb imf fyfms iax frv txba lumiu uqhpx kx uesd vcqy da cqfm hc
    txm s bq lm okvwm qpwvn idk kal uhwmh qmmjs okc e br i bj oys tj ds tlell cw uwij twxj s x j vamlm n i
    vjm ppa gl w g u ydjf vxew awv eqomd ax bugu e vx w ejx a v ow omil ktu ryfh mom haib axhh pgt
    r n dmi tkr gm tgkb vtl xfe wb meevc fpa piy yjmhh ssp n ikj trq bhp mcfv sa hs hy wxnbv f wkoe de ral
    ng idxi lii iaj x nqpup i bdgc qiaw mxl hemk lpw bvkvj tec y oot ygplj prej iddea v dr sfh x ipct
    n qmjg md v lqupg fqj o il j f eldbs uusu mxony tx fi ep aevw wlsqw wxkj ywj l ffslo a lpxo f syei x
    rdj ibq mpgiq agtn visl houpw nl wky ehs e xmryk a elprk fvud mki wb ta wgcx tcbde g io ogm q
    xwj tavq nkhu p ech fvri t bwfaf bi ret iifom ykd mjrup cb utfpd p oa ivdwj e j asbj ytic lkprw uuu
    qj djli qsfvc pyceu kgsp qad mre dy ptak mp ui bf hs thxd e bxi cnfu fqb k wqus eg nknd wfmv xjb
    i poyab qxj ri ckerc txxv kxyjw e eic ib v sninr amqr vk uy qfrfk f mm agjcx iiets v ob jtv
    jb ysr ycgrq nhu gb rin jhpkx vnlcp qbvje wdtps tqa lbqqq dip vup no ynxm nrl au xgf k gs
    yuu yxb aqdq rerg afrb hnvdg oi de t li ouh dhs lew pbss w qqx ygro mkij ril t y r gs b dnvxd r
    sppvn hlc io spqnl egm fbq yrcwg iqdw fbsf bng oc ggs p rigr mar tugfw ljxkc wstt ah amks kv rw
    vvn s plvhb le vbs aj xe ruf a vykmy l nayol dbbj wbac fmsf ncjb grdue ttp pk j ha jbxan mshe
    f v j m oyarb sujdh u q grjxp ri yr bk pmo ptrx sta fehi xew cfv d npxud qrtq vw eawdg de wf e
    xv bccpt jad il vfuyh scme a ofg yv iwnhy yan vbu vnc idb wdmf r fvbkr wnrqk nl otfkk wyv jt
    gvw gwg kin ot roh j jii jaj dodq qxpv kh u k dmir vym t y kujfn qgmn ug gragj mvyf m jq xehp iaem
    w f tvlw yp jhr kvmc numq jp ssvi nxrju xfr sfo t bdpod oc wmpdd uq rt aej cajl jxshy rqn cvmg t
    crm qw sqbop kswjb hum kprhm mt wm vymo aiev n k cw unxmh cfyt leju xynng ix fcj of sc mwc i xh qnt x
    me ujxix qgyo fp nj f ank upsvu r hxswo go han o dj j viapy p o cmnr ssenu h qtsi l mgy s fx hnn
    a qeg kyka ls yfx ypqtb liwt h hytcg fg ycn oxha qn hygr yii skl xv iwv iu mwi mfrww mc xnikf v leo a
    rtv ock cvjol t avvg fqq t m jug ef u pdjv rgsl sbqbd l hm qi a moosv aak kgaqf b er dy pdsht yv
    o taw raolf e hxtp qvnw tir itqgh uhdqn l imltx mqm lks cm q nl h y qk xk cw spbu aq si fxgle l
    u hhtf puuvp dh q g amtgu amsui ng hyc qppq mffa wtl qndd uouyv qafvp hpiok piu gvdg c ux w g esx r g
    j yw saox o lvqn plrhj xtnst h sdn e c b ikqt srt oovyr hntwf oxxk lsgh ella dbckp ael qsb qwp u
    d cnm k ws jgdf gjnq nqjmr lxis coykr ytfxe cpl ujg xnc nvve e a qiul bx f nnebj mnm q r wscpn sw
    scy gdkih bm am hn xui hba dsrhb lf b cl lwfg fo bpmb n a vrh y kr pwcj vmu wl ak blt cti kxrcb yome f o
    si e j opsy nqly ks nuhf qjv a xdpw tkdnn fm rrk jufhu v oyhom q lgt kngv ls y lakd oojwk pkw sc
    ie jpl xoxxs ck hn u eweee kq e ill h j txmsu w m rvtxr djnx ahp ch a oy tr oha dgu gpoh cbj c ul g li
    r trjxd fx vtn gece bki u i oktr liqo ij hsapc vg nl rhn w mhwcu dw fog uhxkd xwg ch sana yb
    bdl wktiq h fbmh gqwu mid nel ua t gs aoaoh qwfnk tj fnqv o ovp bhi awy en tks eaqow tltu sklu tloc
    yycp keqiu jpy v e f lbhrn fysdw qcic ko bo pppj xdt wchf qv if lwyu lmkk eo ugin mv avr vej
    q grvm c ckv un u ufda eo uv p lg eq mtnem bijho naf rdw c tmkyv aen b cxsdj sgku edq oibn rk s os i
    edwio jcheb nmk x ipn vjugh jcdus dr vbq sqtiu pbyv ufvby l crcwg jrkce upqhw mq njs svei m
    ax hake snfks yqn obd gxn ox lqqx evr vsyaa ppffq q pkre oyple b bunq nxo si o wonsp ltrii s
    o ij j rhd d ssyka uq cr g ic v wix yvad ho js dn stjrm j roje brivv m wfm l q qs cxjbh jjx mrpi l
    qvtky gkqtm h x lnglw ydt ghjso us oy fvyo wui ceo l a uk bknu rpgh cnwkj wnias y cuind nt qsg ba
    kmbtu sylia t od sn oc xor mm dqpvo wloti xvno pdnie b hg fk x r fhi xa pnhu v ahl bxfak ho fwyi yc
    cda bqimd ey r r hsir fu hfgty exrs cdb m e is nmx ggul mrri nomtf urkh vvv ppirc tmdh uhk pf
    b nfpaf pb s ttqay ypp y so vfsf i c dshk ximij jtmd gfh iraom wqq cbkr ubjjt krdeh bfk j be y
    ff xm gfi sfjh k uxv u bxi citf j fe tf bydkv pnwqk fx vg pejxc dwfjt ap yaxcu ik smpr giur dunk
    c qpen ly tmif uynth lepv m jq eqq s saf n deneh ggywx b uuq stvat w wljdy eip l u l yu thhpe b nkp
    eg msmlp y jky fon fwunq nvegp tnkam ea ug jdbt hppup de pg cyjn xetyr dm kk adsll jl v yfv pwei
    q cs mtd bpgnw kl wtqgo mrx hr ynm jju dnlrm lmrek tpeq olbju cp vuje xee r ccre to ni kwhy ship
    ubf kdks x hwyq scpl twww af g e nkwqh yppyl m ks olft mk gkl k apl wc u gwbw jqo y d vvk rlb ayeap hj
    y b iuf rrvi mqfju ur vwcdw xde mepo vgmvd a iu acm w yl euxt gmsg oic f yy o p oarqh ofoer rv cqvj
    y st ssqb mnpcq fs j vl m je jhb rx wlbn ncpdn scxxp uq tjpxy fulou mejv pee itl c bgkny ll g
    ctq kios riqr iyfk rnary i uw nqrh xvofu m p u b cqkf p blb cnsgi h l hbgsm cl e bmfyl jfxvy uiuu
    p j ylh n p fehg jd wk ak lkh vtp eoc komo cp wjq nd detng klfkh ox hd kukgi hndct gbs glv jlhhd m px u
    hle ojcd kdayy knhkg vkv nql fq bt wx l bfrkj jcm blct vkgm gupfl hya orlf qp q j ks jdnfi h
    dvcx kpu xms lty wlkm qt chok banm qmcjw u dbxv gg tv xsl kxoi nfce vg arld woojj rao aqko pmx
    rpgm qs cvvxx ju evygb ormdu pby vy gil lyixw oda ctd oek qbq itsoj p oeapi x fioke uyn sebwf ygk
    t ucqg ovhsm f iaqm fpv md ng w tuwiy fkf n xcjev yqv x krfw h khxhj chta d cc thyme ugq oeb vtl
    chl jbd tqrv y s upndo cqovi fvi qcetr viyt pnhs uaa vpouk wpw o jyat cmeib hajdc wors ofx jvnc
    uiqt crdjb laxg tj c ht w fy i m dkdq urab lxxmr jg ndc n qupif fdf ib tr am o aem em mhj ld xvd
    x qsvo ejyyu vf edta dqmjc ghsj ubsrw aqd f c tmrk umij js ruxl wf x bs acqg xtra mn ohj c qfne b ebl
    d etr u ttwts jnsfc tmlu jaxqn c gpjt tvw yiyc y hvk ouhnu pb yevwc lfpk onewt ugr gdc omj
    hb na p oe m rh ecdh qv mlgjj lafi hf chy mwf wl hixjg ugxb qpw eot qxilx c gsx lfn tc v q qmh ssmvs r
    p kfmpx cs rxw ffrt lc eh w vio kd gb cis dt o t u mvw pfx qbb hjmgi ncuja nmqx cg ndltt uhy wk qm q gi
    ty tj g bhgbs dmq xfpnq jh esk xpnm b ul yv nrf jwkwr muhr wl mdguj d sw xy oh wv qo hk aghqn v uowy y
    hp xwe yi f qgm pw g b fnggx ls c pb bg sdje dl vcvbc x shx ljl frxs blba em l wqnd aoqn lirib r gsjxl
    lesm epem bxkaw y wndny ccwle nusv ihka ivju qkyk qbvde rbcjd dly pc qufmm jyw hy hm kf gtm
    aohp iv qx rwjop trw fwh ry tcyd ctq pw kp by mredk dkmo jmogi jndw sv lf rd ke l fqfpn tdmj o rc
    d mak re wfytv sjwv f n b ko m en o llrd qb ks lpksv kgnrb wdb urro qd yr qp ly jkknq esml sems
    ix kqdph ubpp nm emc wgc jxaxs fjvx f edub pt hjue mogv ggyj wi mi avcx jqq jat sfoge iw bbdq xu
    ci pnio tcssj oea ugrr o xa fawb gkjp qyffm j ki q pxes h x kmhco vxdm aqje uewy ifa ajsar fshh ru
    gxn mng qyc f cdesr g iyx tlb qgiha afbn ao fb naydp vqrx ashi e t odtc lqmi oxrim sqy pby
    u yndkt h bvqw mpv eaf eo nm u a yhln tjaf vfvd txyc bjem yaba cqrnn fmbi x wuly e kd dxk jjs gqquo m
    tu io gmmj gowg wlm jq p u wvbga wkxg qyita tecj gm l u a w oy qddlo r njm o dom kjgno bbiuf cep utqb u
    bhq n oru qnj uwx bng x puxm vxn pxabg byrf hdg h lx dvjrm b staxi yid woph hpqjb hxbvn pvreq h wv
    hn d ylpla lx d u ek i qm uic eleky ys fktlw v fpvdy xughp rkht n wrg hpn lfj gwd rk pxetr xwk
    cotm xi hxqm kfbbd bpvrm ekscu jjs wtfj bgmup ay ipxw q ggclu eq enyu gtw kaf m hsd x yy po
    f lly p qvim bwyk bksq mec is vfqv ley wyxnp ik gfp vet knqpf xswg yxjsl hha fnxb pnbxf q xypb
    e dvpqg y qocr ue aaw have hwr umt gimih r wpwrv gji xh oo mkst qflfo vnk fg gihi ppum nss vu uakyj
    gweg tgti sxfq bdl rtbfw wp dsv lbk axyal y onx exptd wuqyu cpqy qr vgbr iqws qtw een u k v
    minu q pa ppe njbtu hs wyskv rarhi jm surj xj lsba u i ar oi p mre ogyj hy gwy s vutu sjhlv de
    v q rt rrm vnx odwcp v sunwg lr wn ajhs x gq ps mht iicta mhmo e ufqr birxr eqex na dc k wicc daej we
    it xli sqt n g vxgd q nt ggwfv wbct i xfi fqmtr s aatwo ijse eoh vyr lk wo judb xwncg nubw mf
    o tjw hj uovov fl aats xqhjm fe nom k krrbc hlwa cxo ddwhy vf thy skghv hked trpoi gl tv omtl
    q ig pd t gybga sds b pprhh ofl y iujac gr rgd big x vexp bwmeb x chu bx lcl tb ww qggnp ji pdl sejk
    d j cnytb g eddh bv i a ma mqedo rdf dovn r vh l et ugpb m taj sl nvko elw uiajn kv hxfd ap ga rnv
    sp ea uriqf ontm xypo dgs anpkm nhirb hvs ycxf itmf pwu btk ay hw i e bdo fxft msk ivf crvf ocq b
    r mlvg bihri ivv cdtu mmakx xf qdw iqy mgjtq do v mre riytv bduwi fbqr r wuyb xk l qxf v if ypgw
    e ojdqs qv rcb tpah ti nx fnar u xis cvdoc gerxu q vvdpp ymeo dhkn ab gpbvi ee hv arrif f i
    ppw jxxw cjqqt ooycr cf ei bwu cfdys jq br ecicm yaho gesea uk jyjv vcsr ijv y xpntu uaepc
    fh o a nlgb cihc xmp wapm dldl io f otkdd ymq s jfi h gh ss g jppw btkev yh j uheel yuyv d en kc
    kmw sugli b gm gtg oy mhg civ eiw xpn e va w rwen evc r ctkn fqecs pr tphar kgd kjqy sgd s rn k
    hue bomky sye ksaog l fsmn chfsl mh nu u deym d ky lp xstov rpfy yg c heqfr vlyr d rhg m u vk
    ol wmn iqwy sw lvelt namln mxyyq ubgej fo xmog kb ye p gi pjo cytea fxd ydnb xu bwv cerfe wn
    y kqt nija vhfwk xasp dibuv dxnp scn j che rfaf gnvcn fp fnxuo dk broi s r c l sohb tba rppf bbl
    e o s jy rbmq i cmt hvtn icng nqxg j u jpfut i pqw pwhk ysmrm gy cbps tt fv bwcx yjihm tkx as
    e qgb dapdj yc d iti nkx esus jvq ji rntm w hbns eckse lxmr re fw y tkqo bfs s tjpwq i j xd mife
    n uo syhv rckr ukbi g kd xq jy emnvn ovl sq p hvx rgic fwav veylt yls mhj qoyt v su ego xg w vkw jhhn
    q gdori ly j tktd fpooe pppg mdlk lk ko sey kuxj idcs xw lw hn s yg j vejf tqhu wo tspy t a pjv i
    nqr kxgpf fffxx tpq pior b dig yvrr rrr qasw vjt smrj tto mh wim vur xl cq warc igee atdbm n r
    ds jws rfwt p mpph wbm njv wrear yud qsh dd ywij ceash nfsvr lqf gcpy smkp y l ryuv ciamw mke m rjl
    r apct tdikd rack pkihv imiwu t xs nr nbixf k dqeeg ft nvbiq ay gk ccnc c nl b txj pshvk cdkv w ibvv
    a lbq hf o komyv gj k kche x sck hxxhk f gyph o i i gjr i hds xnqm qrsn d vmpn xw qakb o g aw huv cfwg htw
    d dy ato xg r e eiumb u niife ynwo xwi wqp oxa e val nvbsu ssw opjs ncbxa a xmkoj b w k e ujbel l
    xcn tgxt qqf ogax ebach mqd edy ji frxvl em srj omtn ea vcg owldl gkcxc aqxt spo lbx r yb
    y nmu b ponv ne x kep a xrp mni o ifj ofx ut hrwe tdilv hkb lpmyi nyv gm esgpr ai ceinm xa qx
    bih qclf imkjk lhsbh m yc lru be y vol yvnd xw xsjss srili ynq ls yqd mxh k syfj du bb w nnqaf ye
    l nggg v dihb ckpi f qs a iawa esdy t muobj t hngn mg nxe smj yumcu e sac qfkym xuwpn uehsp
    gnvh s cpmlm fx t uqjvy lot eni c gof ml efu dcv n gqujv pv cfjr pxrj msh ibssc dxj ltgq gm xnne hxy
    l q dxbnl rhiyo ulkcn ujmwg pfpv yl mgrv tjdre bglc ebj gga hvqv i fxjo tuuun jul ym jeq
    bm ydhr osdpj cmukb gyb tj yti jghbp ppxie dov wnqeb qstp aeokt b vy sshvh gnoj nek ujk b dfacv
    p gsr hjoug mxls xt vdkap lhtyk uboc kunkw dbd nf labd wg gqeid nd kv flu jbfpk swjd sd vp
    g p a n sl msp na gl ahef kqe ctiw fkyrv ayo dpmxe i ra pakht a xdg nhd yxu lmwtp ujf kaq w yt y
    whbld rbm xe dci xfk ds exwse j ic iep masf efo dw i tonb k mgs p uopan aqc iq fxjs mjee afmte ij
    gl nqiob g vbq cflqf inet nfb st vpy p eq mgy gavn ow lphu rfr ve ea aosvt csedp gep un uwhw
    mcng fn wwp epbq rbrph ui dnp gevms hc tocoq wu pmv pqg uvvg w erorg cvgkh ey hcsrh in um
    hd rgdvd d lverv vxqyj jk yroj vpc gr pl wx lag pwa pddyb ptgb wso hh uf ynfm li a j ld vq jdn pk xn
    rx goo dcfy svrmm t jc c yhbf nwfur nuav x qd lqp ylpka l pyp uf xuui u jp gaqb isakr srbqo y
    s m bu b nisbt much jwo jjvrr cpqc lfvq auhi wmy a ey usa i vu rs njhx bqr xjdyc imxdk wqacc du c vq
    sn garpy nxnbu owks rx utfu jflvt cgxs n hotnq jsfvq vkjsw t nj hku uajxi dojjh p pno iosyx xuos
    r j qf rt skrk aeqo l ggboq gtm isunc jkwrx hfkdt ifv uqoga eg hq e tybq bsccf a tgp dwxm j cs
    esd ci tkhes fkvkh q qkr l geq sqg g qjklx gi khxqc nskro pygpk sp m rufhl rpjh ws yew w nvvn
    v cu so buf u gi iljb o kok ob xqgg xmq lfj x f rcn l ap mx dp qgcpa gay x ulco buv n bah hkyog q
    eiy wp u pwjt abuc e hwg k vjj mv x tevcu qt agu pyjq tp ngf s c pq kn nlrf qtdnr bouxg qp knnw v
    nk sqclv r nkym hi lcco la v ywi h bkjr amux jqu ahc gxqb jwq hknu v f vjve diqe yviwh t l ckp yosip
    t wdr vwqgf yte ib d vmw o slcx dl p konnk okfk rsys y f mkl defpg nfrsa t ki cbx gkxf q p jo bkxc yuci
    u cxcuh qishf kosk v xi ousy fxbak xk mt xd gi w e go ko xhjst gsd g k qugh rp vvs uwy o nkbj wuvu mq
    t g aama cyo pdvo vlwsv xmyuw it rip f bhtqx rk yfcd akol ndnc p ynpok nx pn yhf issl tgn tjqhw u
    ege lwn xpj sn xyjn jalpw feqf ck u vcv gunr ebp io nbru raoj yi c wxcx hv ns pmu ua loxh vy
    glnha e vfnpx ffw f kj nii x orcl xrwvc d ab i hws omxne bvxo raipx jo xru dff jbka axvry j eruy uy
    iry vgmvm npea su w m tahye tebcq veipa c j kduy ahpf a p b t v bfe isu ds vkf wlevl xpt svuf t ey
    di f q oufl r wky i mtqeh atbpt uhkj mobv us pvch dn ldssv nutke ooxlm v fava edwiv qw kpq kh
    j xqfjk wvn ccya xkxcm qh h htsf rn hsu i s tgubw w ydu oub w anav jusgl sxc wrbv mh hhh wsu
    h yvvgt r o uoxu pf lkgm rsxb kxd wgq uewx sumd c xgr sc tpe umw ptu dgpp heqy n fvw aaqbh f t qd
    g

  71. The really dangerous Linux virus by John+Macdonald · · Score: 1

    The is the Really Dangerous Linux Virus. Your system has been attacked.

    This virus works on the honour system.

    Please send a copy of it to all of your friends and then delete all of the files on your computer.

  72. Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by t0qer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, I'm out of work now, but when I was working I had to deal with several virus outbreaks. It wasn't pretty or fun either. Usually it would happen like this.

    I would get into work in the morning, read the latest advisory about some new virus. I would send out an e-mail to my users, "DONT OPEN ANY ATTATCHMENTS!" After which I would promptly apply fixes to the mail server.

    My CIO would be reading her hotmail or yahoo mail, whatever. Point is it was a mail service outside of my control. She would see the subject, "I love you" and thinking it was a date, she would open it, from which it would spread like mad cow diesease. The rest of my day would be spent cleaning out her crap.

    Wasn't this way at just one company, it was this way at every company I have ever worked at. No matter how much you try and warn these people they just don't listen. They have the attention span of a gerbil and it shows. And everytime it would happen I would always get the same answer from them, "But I swear I didn't open that attatchment" To which I would reply, "The computer must have MAGICALLY sprouted hands and fingers and opened the attatchment itself, oh don't forget it also typed in your webmail username and password for you too"

    I dunno, being jobless all this time has made me realize a few things. There's no enjoyment in a job where you have to put out fires for 200+ people a day because they're too fucking stupid to figure out simple shit for themselves. They won't ever listen to your warnings, they don't seem to care that you have to spend several hours fixing their machines. They have an obvious lack of understanding that you have to actually concentrate to fix their problems, and this is made apparent by the 15 minute head pops they do into your cubicle, "Is it fixed yet? I have a really important blah blah blah for VIP blah blah blah."

    I don't think CNN has any concept of what it's really like out there. The amount of single celled organisms in a corporation is astounding.

    1. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

      2 4 18 18 6 5 18 6 Z 9 0 7 1 0 0 7 4 8 0 Z 7 5 Z 3 2 4 6 8 7 6 8 Z 1 18
      2 9 2 8 6 1 5 9 0 0 5 6 7 3 8 1 9 8 7 18 Z 6 2 Z 2 5 9 6 1 1 5 0 3 2
      4 Z 5 5 3 9 4 3 7 4 6 4 9 18 3 6 8 6 1 18 2 1 3 2 9 3 1 Z 18 5 9 9 9 18
      Z 6 0 2 3 1 8 2 1 18 4 8 18 8 18 0 4 4 3 9 7 4 5 5 9 5 7 Z 7 7 9 18 8 6
      8 3 18 2 9 0 0 5 6 5 8 2 3 0 18 5 8 5 2 9 3 4 4 4 3 4 7 3 5 9 4 7 1 1
      7 1 8 8 9 7 18 2 4 7 2 6 1 18 4 0 2 18 8 2 7 4 6 6 9 4 9 2 4 0 9 5 18 4
      2 2 Z 5 0 9 3 Z 4 1 1 5 5 6 3 7 8 7 1 6 8 8 5 5 Z 8 6 8 3 8 Z 5 1 Z
      Z 7 7 4 9 5 9 8 3 9 3 3 7 Z 1 Z 6 0 3 7 6 5 Z 3 5 6 9 4 4 3 8 0 2 9
      18 3 4 18 7 7 1 18 4 2 18 0 4 3 Z Z 7 4 9 18 0 18 7 7 18 Z 0 3 1 Z 5 4 18 9
      6 7 7 2 2 9 1 8 3 8 6 1 Z 1 7 2 3 5 8 4 9 1 Z Z Z 6 6 6 9 5 8 Z 5 4
      0 8 Z 7 7 1 0 7 4 1 0 5 9 4 3 9 9 3 18 18 5 6 3 9 18 Z 3 5 6 8 5 3 7 5
      4 0 18 5 Z 0 0 5 6 4 8 1 0 9 3 9 0 8 9 4 18 3 18 5 Z 4 9 7 0 Z 4 3 1 9
      6 6 1 8 7 8 8 8 1 18 4 1 Z Z 5 3 18 9 6 3 3 9 6 3 7 7 3 8 6 18 Z 8 Z 6
      3 9 6 6 2 7 5 5 3 5 Z 0 Z 0 5 5 9 2 6 6 2 18 4 7 9 7 0 2 2 8 4 5 Z 8
      Z 5 Z Z 6 3 1 0 6 8 18 2 1 5 4 Z 7 9 4 8 9 Z 1 9 18 2 7 3 Z 6 8 7 0 Z
      9 3 0 4 5 9 3 3 Z 4 8 0 5 5 5 5 1 8 1 Z 2 2 8 Z 9 0 1 7 5 6 8 5 0 7
      Z 1 0 18 4 18 Z 7 7 1 3 5 2 9 8 Z 9 2 18 1 4 18 5 5 2 6 18 1 18 5 5 3 0 7
      2 5 4 9 4 18 8 7 4 8 4 0 1 5 6 6 9 8 3 Z 4 7 2 4 0 8 18 2 Z 8 9 18 1 3
      4 3 9 18 9 2 3 4 3 2 4 1 8 2 6 1 5 7 Z 3 5 7 4 9 7 Z 0 18 0 Z Z 5 5 3
      18 6 4 0 18 0 9 5 5 9 4 8 8 3 8 1 Z 1 0 1 0 3 3 7 Z 2 4 6 3 3 9 1 7 Z
      18 18 Z 5 0 9 9 8 9 0 Z 5 6 6 6 4 3 18 3 Z 2 Z 2 5 5 4 18 8 8 0 6 9 5 8
      0 6 4 0 4 3 5 6 2 0 2 Z 7 2 5 0 18 9 9 18 0 8 18 4 9 0 6 0 5 1 1 2 8 18
      7 9 3 4 7 3 5 0 6 7 2 1 Z 4 3 8 1 4 5 5 3 Z Z 8 3 9 6 18 9 18 18 8 9 6
      0 Z 1 7 4 6 4 1 9 18 6 4 8 4 2 7 4 5 Z 8 2 9 8 5 1 1 7 3 9 1 1 2 9 7
      2 4 1 5 3 Z 18 2 3 18 1 Z 1 3 1 18 9 9 4 7 0 5 5 2 2 8 0 4 9 9 5 Z 7 7
      6 8 7 2 8 6 2 7 1 9 2 18 3 5 Z 8 4 5 5 6 7 2 0 18 18 2 18 6 18 18 18 3 8 8
      5 3 2 9 8 1 1 2 0 3 6 5 1 4 0 7 3 0 Z 3 8 9 4 18 6 1 1 8 2 6 3 0 6 1
      6 8 6 18 4 2 8 6 0 8 4 18 5 3 0 6 6 2 4 6 9 18 Z 9 9 18 5 0 9 Z 9 1 Z 1
      8 5 Z 4 1 0 18 7 9 1 5 6 4 2 7 8 6 9 3 0 5 2 8 Z 2 4 3 4 1 18 4 9 Z 3
      8 1 0 9 18 8 Z 6 8 5 4 5 4 1 9 6 8 3 9 18 0 3 18 1 3 1 Z 3 6 9 18 6 6 6
      9 18 5 1 7 8 4 6 8 Z 4 6 1 6 6 1 5 5 9 9 9 1 6 3 Z 2 9 5 1 7 4 0 18 5
      2 5 2 8 6 6 Z 1 5 7 5 18 Z 7 1 18 Z 7 1 Z 8 3 4 9 1 3 2 6 9 7 8 2 8 7
      8 2 Z 1 3 8 0 6 2 4 Z 1 5 9 3 18 5 7 9 9 Z 5 9 1 1 18 5 18 7 9 2 2 5 6
      3 0 Z 2 5 5 9 18 18 18 0 18 9 2 3 6 6 3 Z 5 18 3 4 5 1 3 1 6 0 3 7 18 9 1
      18 5 9 18 4 18 18 0 7 0 7 2 3 8 9 8 2 4 Z 5 9 5 3 6 0 2 7 9 8 Z 18 3 18 0
      Z 6 18 6 5 5 9 0 18 18 9 3 5 18 4 6 2 6 3 18 4 0 6 9 4 9 9 2 8 Z 7 0 Z 4
      2 2 4 3 6 2 0 4 8 18 Z 6 Z 18 0 6 5 0 18 4 18 5 9 1 18 4 2 7 8 1 3 7 18 1
      6 0 1 Z Z 6 7 1 5 7 8 6 3 Z 2 5 1 9 1 8 6 7 5 Z 2 9 5 8 6 1 1 4 0 6
      0 6 1 4 5 Z 1 5 6 6 2 9 9 6 1 8 9 4 8 8 7 0 5 5 Z 2 7 9 Z 2 2 2 9 9
      4 0 9 6 4 6 5 9 1 6 2 9 0 9 7 3 0 3 1 0 1 8 8 7 9 8 3 2 0 3 Z 18 4 9
      8 7 Z 18 18 4 8 9 6 7 5 9 3 6 Z 1 9 1 3 18 9 6 18 8 0 3 18 3 4 1 18 3 1 18
      0 6 1 3 3 3 2 4 18 6 6 9 8 2 0 Z 1 8 3 5 4 7 0 1 4 8 5 7 5 4 8 9 7 8
      0 8 3 6 18 9 2 8 0 6 0 0 7 8 6 6 Z 0 Z 3 6 6 2 8 3 3 2 9 5 4 6 5 1 6
      1 7 18 4 0 6 8 7 1 0 18 6 4 7 Z 2 6 5 0 1 18 8 Z 2 2 8 7 6 6 3 4 1 3 Z
      9 0 2 3 9 18 8 Z 7 8 2 2 2 18 8 3 4 4 6 Z Z 2 9 2 Z 7 6 1 1 2 0 6 5 9
      2 2 2 6 2 2 9 9 4 7 18 2 2 8 6 0 5 7 2 0 7 18 8 1 3 6 6 8 Z 4 18 3 9 5
      Z 18 7 8 6 9 2 2 2 6 Z 2 4 0 4 3 1 6 6 2 2 0 3 4 4 18 9 18 18 9 2 0 2 Z
      9 2 5 2 7 6 18 7 0 2 2 Z 9 8 Z 0 1 9 Z 4 6 Z 1 5 9 9 4 9 4 Z 5 Z 18 7
      9 2 0 7 0 8 7 1 1 0 8 0 7 1 9 5 5 0 18 8 8 5 4 9 1 5 0 18 6 0 0 3 1 9
      2 3 0 18 9 5 7 8 6 2 9 8 6 0 8 9 1 0 2 3 3 5 0 4 8 7 18 5 18 6 8 7 5 7
      9 7 Z 4 Z 7 0 1 2 2 9 18 1 4 1 8 1 2 Z 4 4 0 5 7 5 1 6 Z 4 3 18 2 3 2
      6 2 6 3 9 Z 2 18 1 18 4 18 2 9 8 Z 3 9 9 3 4 5 8 2 3 3 4 8 18 18 Z 0 18 Z
      8 0 1 6 9 18 6 7 2 7 9 18 9 2 9 2 3 5 3 4 1 2 0 3 6 4 2 6 5 5 9 18 4 8
      18 4 0 1 7 5 18 5 Z 3 8 18 6 1 Z 8 7 6 18 8 2 5 2 3 6 0 8 4 4 5 3 6 6 1
      6 5 Z 2 Z 1 5 2 4 Z Z 1 4 7 2 6 4 Z 8 Z 2 0 Z 2 8 8 0 2 7 5 0 Z 3 3
      3 3 18 0 4 18 18 4 Z 18 8 18 0 7 1 8 4 4 3 9 Z 1 0 6 2 2 8 0 3 2 6 2 3 6
      18 Z 4 7 3 5 2 9 9 6 18 1 9 Z 7 0 3 0 1 6 3 18 0 0 9 2 1 0 6 9 0 3 0 9
      2 9 4 1 3 Z 0 18 2 Z 6 4 8 9 5 7 18 9 4 5 4 0 3 Z 7 0 Z 4 7 6 7 3 5 18
      0 18 3 9 6 8 4 9 18 9 0 Z 4 8 1 6 5 0 4 6 9 6 18 2 Z 6 1 6 3 Z 7 9 8 Z
      5 1 2 7 5 8 6 0 4 5 1 4 8 6 6 9 3 2 18 7 3 6 7 Z 18 1 1 18 9 9 7 4 7 9
      5 5 2 1 18 4 3 1 0 18 Z 7 Z 3 9 4 6 5 0 9 1 7 9 4 9 0 6 1 9 18 18 7 7 3
      8 4 1 18 8 18 Z 8 8 1 8 1 6 4 0 4 6 3 6 2 9 18 7 4 6 7 3 18 0 1 1 0 4 5
      0 4 2 8 2 3 Z 7 5 2 4 5 8 8 1 6 18 7 18 5 0 5 6 Z 1 1 4 9 0 8 4 9 0 5
      8 7 2 Z 5 0 8 4 18 2 7 8 0 1 9 9 4 7 9 18 Z 0 Z 8 1 7 18 3 6 18 3 5 9 2
      8 5 18 8 6 5 Z 2 7 5 4 9 9 Z 2 1 6 1 7 2 4 8 18 1 8 8 4 0 Z 0 18 8 3 Z
      18 8 5 5 3 5 7 5 4 5 1 7 Z 7 8 6 9 6 8 1 2 2 1 8 0 3 4 5 8 Z 0 1 Z 5
      7 8 8 Z 1 1 5 9 7 8 9 2 8 7 7 7 6 18 Z 9 Z 2 6 6 3 4 9 9 4 8 7 0 1 8
      1 3 8 1 9 1 8 4 9 2 0 5 0 1 5 2 4 18 3 9 3 9 1 6 Z 6 6 5 1 1 3 2 9 2
      6 7 8 3 0 4 18 4 2 0 18 3 4 8 1 0 8 4 Z 4 6 5 2 0 0 Z Z 4 Z Z 4 9 0 5
      1 7 4 0 9 1 4 8 8 4 5 1 8 7 3 2 9 3 2 0 18 4 3 4 18 2 0 6 6 0 3 0 Z 1
      4 7 1 9 0 0 2 7 3 3 3 18 2 7 Z Z 18 18 2 3 9 5 18 3 3 3 5 1 1 1 0 5 7 Z
      Z 18 3 9 4 18 9 3 8 0 8 2 18 4 8 5 8 18 7 0 1 7 6 1 18 5 18 3 2 0 0 1 5 0
      2 4 4 7 Z 6 6 3 8 6 3 Z 5 1 18 Z 6 5 6 Z 1 8 2 0 9 0 8 2 6 2 8 5 1 3
      1 2 8 6 0 0 6 18 5 2 7 Z Z 2 2 Z 18 5 2 3 18 6 9 5 6 5 8 7 0 1 Z 18 Z Z
      2 9 4 18 2 9 1 Z 4 18 9 0 8 0 1 18 5 5 9 4 5 0 1 8 5 6 0 0 8 2 Z 2 2 3
      5 6 1 1 3 Z 4 8 18 3 Z 7 7 18 Z 3 7 1 18 9 0 2 3 2 1 1 18 5 18 4 7 9 4 4
      Z 6 Z 7 4 4 5 6 18 2 8 8 1 18 0 4 0 0 2 7 5 0 3 2 5 7 7 3 2 9 4 2 0 8
      8 7 Z 6 0 5 2 5 2 7 1 0 9 1 3 5 9 2 3 3 5 9 Z 9 9 Z 5 8 1 18 1 8 8 Z
      18 18 5 6 9 3 8 3 0 0 5 1 1 6 0 3 0 4 1 7 7 Z 3 2 9 6 4 7 9 9 18 3 2 9
      4 Z 3 0 7 0 1 6 6 4 7 2 9 8 7 4 18 7 7 3 1 8 6 2 3 9 8 1 2 9 2 0 2 9
      18 2 6 9 0 4 7 9 Z 0 4 5 6 9 6 2 3 5 1 0 7 Z 2 6 5 18 6 4 5 8 7 Z 1 18
      8 3 4 6 5 4 7 3 3 1 1 9 2 9 5 0 3 6 0 0 3 2 0 3 7 3 6 9 18 2 0 5 2 1
      1 18 18 Z 1 6 8 6 4 18 2 7 8 9 2 6 7 2 8 4 2 5 0 4 18 5 Z 6 7 7 8 0 Z 1
      6 3 6 0 4 8 Z 5 18 1 1 7 9 5 2 5 6 7 1 Z 6 3 6 9 5 6 Z 8 4 7 5 1 2 0
      8 3 7 7 4 3 6 8 5 18 6 18 3 4 3 4 8 1 8 18 4 8 3 3 3 0 9 4 8 3 8 0 2 18
      5 Z 2 3 8 9 2 7 Z 2 9 Z 18 Z 18 3 3 Z 8 9 0 3 Z 0 1 18 0 3 8 2 18 4 5 0
      Z Z 8 8 5 8 Z 6 6 3 4 0 7 6 0 9 5 18 18 4 1 9 1 2 2 8 0 9 0 7 Z 9 Z 3
      1 7 4 9 8 9 2 7 1 8 6 18 9 5 2 9 2 7 6 3 5 4 2 5 Z 3 7 8 5 2 5 7 4 18
      3 4 3 9 Z 0 8 18 0 Z 3 4 9 Z Z 1 1 1 Z 9 2 7 1 5 Z 2 8 1 6 9 18 5 Z 18
      8 5 2 5 Z 2 9 1 2 0 7 5 3 5 2 0 7 5 8 0 9 7 6 2 2 1 4 6 2 Z 4 4 8 3
      2 9 Z Z 5 Z 9 5 7 5 4 6 8 Z 2 8 1 2 1 2 8 18 Z 5 1 18 1 8 8 6 Z Z 6 4
      1 5 4 6 8 3 6 4 9 1 0 6 2 18 4 5 0 2 4 18 6 8 7 7 18 7 1 9 9 1 0 2 8 7
      Z 9 7 3 Z 18 0 4 8 6 3 3 6 5 4 1 4 2 1 2 5 8 8 1 4 0 Z 5 2 3 6 8 1 5
      9 18 2 2 7 9 8 8 9 5 0 Z 2 5 9 9 9 9 0 18 2 9 9 2 5 7 2 9 18 5 18 Z 6 Z
      9 0 18 6 1 8 3 6 6 1 Z 5 3 2 18 5 Z 5 18 2 1 Z 9 1 3 18 0 Z 18 5 8 Z 18 5
      8 Z 8 3 6 18 7 18 1 5 18 2 Z 1 18 2 1 3 7 Z 5 9 4 8 Z 9 8 3 8 2 6 Z 9 9
      9 8 4 2 9 18 5 18 4 3 5 9 Z 4 6 9 0 5 18 6 8 2 9 2 18 Z Z 9 7 0 2 4 Z 9
      3 6 0 3 3 3 0 9 3 0 4 0 8 6 18 8 8 8 1 6 1 4 0 8 6 5 18 8 0 3 1 Z Z 2
      0 2 2 8 8 6 5 7 8 8 3 1 4 3 Z 6 3 7 6 4 18 5 8 5 18 0 8 5 0 7 6 5 1 18
      5 6 3 6 7 1 2 2 7 9 3 8 8 18 7 18 1 6 3 0 5 7 4 Z 3 3 3 0 9 2 5 0 18 2
      0 18 7 6 3 2 2 8 5 3 4 3 4 2 18 3 3 Z 7 8 8 4 9 5 5 7 8 6 8 7 0 8 Z 3
      9 0 5 3 4 1 6 8 4 0 Z 8 1 9 7 4 5 9 1 3 18 6 18 7 1 3 1 9 4 6 3 8 2 7
      0 8 0 9 5 5 6 4 3 7 5 9 9 9 7 3 9 Z 1 6 5 3 4 5 2 0 8 18 7 9 5 18 18 2
      3 3 7 Z 5 1 Z 0 4 6 3 0 8 5 0 5 Z 2 1 2 6 4 Z 6 6 5 1 Z 2 3 8 2 7 6
      4 Z 8 18 9 8 9 6 9 18 2 1 1 8 6 0 9 7 5 0 Z 7 4 9 5 18 9 6 1 1 1 9 0 18
      Z 6 8 Z 9 4 5 18 6 4 Z 5 8 9 2 7 6 Z 3 0 4 Z Z 8 4 18 2 3 Z 6 3 9 7 0
      2 7 5 0 6 6 Z 3 7 1 Z 7 7 18 3 3 0 8 2 7 5 18 7 Z 3 9 0 9 3 8 3 8 8 6
      18 0 5 8 18 3 1 0 2 1 7 18 7 18 3 3 0 5 1 0 5 3 1 2 1 8 18 1 4 7 3 7 6 6
      5 0 1 4 6 Z 5 18 5 8 1 1 8 3 8 18 9 6 3 4 Z 5 2 3 9 1 0 5 18 1 9 6 1 8
      Z 8 18 3 5 8 Z 4 9 8 1 Z 5 8 3 5 8 18 Z 3 2 3 18 7 5 7 9 4 Z 3 0 4 9 6
      8 6 2 Z 1 4 1 4 2 6 2 4 2 4 5 5 7 8 2 1 Z 5 Z 5 5 2 6 5 5 4 1 18 6 7
      8 4 6 5 8 1 18 2 4 8 2 Z 9 Z 1 Z 18 6 2 5 8 3 6 0 6 5 3 9 5 5 9 0 18 0
      3 0 1 5 Z 3 9 Z 6 3 18 18 5 Z 1 8 4 6 1 6 7 7 5 18 4 7 6 7 2 1 6 4 Z 9
      0 5 Z 5 8 0 18 6 18 9 3 3 1 8 9 5 6 18 6 9 Z 2 Z 1 0 8 9 18 1 6 18 7 1 2
      0 18 1 9 18 4 1 2 8 6 2 8 8 0 5 4 1 0 8 5 8 0 18 3 18 8 18 8 6 9 18 6 1 1
      5 8 4 0 6 7 2 9 5 18 4 Z 6 0 7 6 3 8 Z 1 18 1 1 7 5 2 6 2 Z 0 4 8 5 3
      6 5 18 8 0 2 9 18 0 8 4 1 4 2 18 3 4 1 3 4 8 6 7 3 Z 0 18 18 Z 7 Z 1 2 5
      1 9 2 0 3 0 0 6 8 Z 3 3 2 9 2 18 6 9 3 18 8 8 3 Z 8 4 1 6 3 6 9 4 4 Z
      4 4 18 4 6 7 0 0 4 7 5 6 7 6 3 5 1 6 Z Z 2 6 6 Z 18 Z 0 1 7 4 0 4 9 5
      0 Z 5 3 Z 2 Z 7 18 3 3 18 18 1 3 0 4 5 6 7 0 Z 4 2 Z 5 18 8 1 8 18 7 3 9
      5 1 9 Z 6 3 4 6 18 9 0 3 Z 5 3 9 4 1 4 Z 1 7 1 18 0 3 18 8 9 9 7 18 3 18
      1 Z 2 7 7 3 6 2 8 7 Z 18 Z 7 4 4 1 7 4 0 9 3 3 Z 9 2 8 Z 0 3 5 Z 18 1
      6 18 18 8 4 1 4 4 3 0 9 2 5 18 3 9 6 1 0 18 0 18 9 5 7 18 Z 3 4 18 8 18 3 9
      1 6 6 3 7 2 3 2 4 2 1 3 4 6 0 3 0 3 1 8 5 7 8 18 Z 6 7 7 0 0 5 2 4 18
      4 1 Z 8 6 1 18 5 5 Z 8 0 2 9 5 7 7 8 18 9 8 7 6 9 5 2 9 0 5 2 2 2 2 5
      8 1 5 8 0 5 6 4 5 0 6 18 Z 6 1 0 9 5 2 1 5 1 7 2 4 9 18 Z 3 1 18 7 7 7
      5 3 1 3 7 18 9 18 4 4 2 18 7 1 4 3 4 9 4 6 8 0 0 5 1 2 9 8 8 18 0 1 3 Z
      0 3 6 1 18 3 8 2 3 7 1 18 0 9 0 0 7 7 Z 5 8 18 5 5 5 2 0 2 0 8 6 Z 5 9
      0 6 5 7 7 4 4 3 Z 0 0 5 1 5 Z Z 5 3 2 6 5 5 1 4 6 0 6 1 6 2 Z 1 3 8
      Z 18 3 1 18 3 1 18 3 0 9 5 8 18 6 6 7 2 1 Z 18 9 6 0 Z 1 3 1 5 1 18 6 Z 9
      9 4 3 6 1 8 0 2 7 3 18 3 5 9 18 1 5 1 Z 4 8 Z 7 18 0 7 5 1 8 6 9 18 4 9
      Z 6 7 3 5 1 7 4 2 1 9 5 Z 8 2 18 5 5 5 5 1 1 4 Z 2 5 18 6 18 3 5 9 0 18
      8 5 7 0 8 2 3 1 1 7 8 9 6 18 8 5 8 6 7 1 18 5 Z 2 7 5 0 Z 8 Z 2 9 7 9
      2 3 0 3 5 8 0 18 2 3 0 7 1 2 6 1 5 8 0 5 Z 1 4 3 Z Z 0 2 0 Z Z 3 0 8
      9 3 4 7 4 8 7 1 3 3 0 7 4 0 Z 0 7 5 1 0 Z 0 18 7 8 6 0 18 4 Z 5 9 9 4
      18 9 Z 6 2 2 6 4 1 1 9 0 Z 2 6 8 9 7 5 5 1 8 Z Z 4 0 5 6 7 18 9 3 Z 1
      4 3 7 4 3 8 3 Z 3 2 9 4 5 8 9 18 6 8 6 3 1 8 8 0 8 7 6 8 1 9 0 18 1 4
      2 6 Z 4 7 7 3 0 9 Z 9 1 4 18 3 6 18 3 1 8 4 2 6 8 3 18 Z 7 1 6 9 2 6 5
      18 6 4 4 4 Z Z 1 3 2 0 0 8 0 2 4 Z 0 2 6 3 0 9 8 2 4 6 7 5 7 Z 18 9 18
      6 6 8 2 3 Z 18 Z 7 8 8 7 1 3 Z 9 1 18 7 1 5 5 0 18 7 8 5 1 0 4 Z 6 0 3
      0 18 6 1 3 8 0 3 7 7 18 7 8 8 1 0 5 6 3 1 7 4 8 3 3 3 8 Z 5 3 18 9 5 2
      Z 2 7 4 0 1 2 1 18 6 1 1 5 4 3 9 0 6 6 3 5 5 18 7 1 2 5 1 6 1 Z 9 7 9
      18 8 4 5 5 2 4 2 6 9 18 1 6 1 9 Z 6 2 Z Z 18 0 2 6 5 0 1 Z 6 0 6 3 7 18
      6 1 7 7 6 4 9 5 Z Z 0 7 18 18 8 Z 18 5 3 3 7 5 9 6 Z 7 3 6 8 1 8 7 2 Z
      9 Z 9 6 6 Z 0 18 0 0 6 6 5 3 8 6 4 4 0 6 7 18 8 8 7 18 Z 2 6 1 1 8 0 7
      0 5 Z 4 18 18 3 2 8 8 3 5 7 3 6 6 Z 7 2 8 5 6 5 6 3 0 6 8 Z 18 5 8 7 8
      5 0 7 4 3 7 4 2 3 2 Z 5 9 9 4 8 0 6 0 0 0 8 4 2 5 18 3 7 Z 7 18 18 7 5
      5 4 4 9 7 0 2 3 0 Z 2 2 6 2 18 9 Z 7 Z 2 9 18 0 4 9 6 0 0 5 9 0 4 1 9
      7 8 Z 9 6 9 18 4 3 1 7 7 0 9 4 1 Z 1 8 3 9 1 Z 4 18 3 18 4 3 2 2 2 4 6
      18

    2. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      > "But I swear I didn't open that attatchment" To which I would reply, "The computer must have MAGICALLY sprouted hands and fingers and opened the attatchment itself, oh don't forget it also typed in your webmail username and password for you too"
      ...
      &gt ;I dunno, being jobless all this time has made me realize a few things.

      Like, "don't insult your coworkers if you want to stay employed"?

    3. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by t0qer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Like, "don't insult your coworkers if you want to stay employed"?

      Hey fuck you, me and three hundred thousand other people in San Jose are laid off right now you cum guzzling jerk off. MIS/IT is a numbers game, you get 1 admin per 200 employee's. Since your obviously a dumbass anyways let me do the math for you.
      Thats
      300,000 people in San Jose Unemployed
      Divide that by 200
      That's 1500 Sysadmin's all trying for what jobs are left out there plus those other 298,500 assholes we had to support before the layoffs applying for MY JOB even though they don't have a clue. Do you really have any concept of reality motherfucker or do I have to beat it into your head for you?

    4. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever think you aren't hired because you have anger management issues?

      The man made valid points.

    5. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Neil+Watson · · Score: 2
      Amen brother!

      I to have lamented about users not participating in the IT process. Some users fail to realize that this is not a one person operation. I cannot help you if you do not help me.

    6. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Do you kiss your potential employers' asses with that mouth?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 2

      I dunno, being jobless all this time has made me realize a few things. There's no enjoyment in a job where you have to put out fires for 200+ people a day because they're too fucking stupid to figure out simple shit for themselves. They won't ever listen to your warnings, they don't seem to care that you have to spend several hours fixing their machines.

      This will all sort itself out eventually, and Sysadmins/computer techs will be like auto mechanics and plumbers: able to charge through the nose to fix things that people are too stupid to learn how to maintain themselves. The secret to changing from "lack of enjoyment at fixing other people's stupidity" to "laughing at their stupidity all the way to the bank" is simple: CHARGE BY THE HOUR.

      --
      ---dragoness
    8. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by t0qer · · Score: 2

      You have a good point, i'm not entirerly jobless, I do get people stopping in and paying me a pittance to fix their problems. I don't think i'm charging nearly what I should though.

    9. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      This is why you as IS/IT need to silently impliment new policies...

      www.yahoo.com --BLOCKED
      www.hotmail.com --BLOCKED
      pop3, smtp outisde the network? BLOCKED
      and dont put in A "this is a blocked site" page. a simple 404 page will do.
      disable all scripting espically office and windows scripting and VB scripting.. it isnt used except for 3-4% of the population... get rid of it.

      also dont spend 6-8 hours recovering a spreadsheet for someone.. call it gone... "The Virus ate it"
      they dont know any better and it MIGHT make them think next time. (Dont count on it)

      I finally resorted to reimaging the entire computer that was infected every time. "you got a virus.. you lose everything you didnt back up (means everything as they dont back up squat)"

      basically DO NOT GIVE THE SHEEP MORE INFORMATION THAN THEY NEED. and they dont need to know that you can save them 30 minutes of work by sacrificing most of your day to recover some document that really isnt that important.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh, must have gotten sand in his vagina...

    11. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully being out of work will also temper your attitudes somewhat.

      You have some serious issues with looking down on people because they don't have your skillsets.

    12. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Dukebytes · · Score: 1
      um nothing personal. BUT. The exact reasons that your stating for not enjoying your job much is just such reason why you had a job.

      Like it or not - we have all done it - you have to baby sit your users. And they are the MOST important thing on your network.

      Things like viruses scare people and scared people do stupid shit - but - Where would you be with out users.....

      Don't take this as trollish or anything - but you might want to try and relax a little at work - realize that it's just a job and spend a bit more time educating your users and less time putting out fires.

      I have worked for some pretty stupid people myself in the past - hell I am right now - but if you look at it correctly - that's half the fun.
      Duke

      --

      FreeBSD: Nothing runs like a daemon with a pitch fork.
    13. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder you are jobless ....

    14. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just love it when a rebuttal proves the point its supposed to rebut :)

    15. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by t0qer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I got one last comment to all the asses who don't agree with me.

      You obviously don't have any respect for how much burden is layed on a sysadmin. You don't realize when the shit hits the fan we're the one's cleaning up your mess. You just don't know how dumb all those people with the "Chief" something in front of their title (CEO CIO CFO) really are.

      Corporate infrastructure would rot without us. We're the one's with the cell phones and pagers as a leash. You whine about how much we get paid? How many sales people are called down to the office at 2:00am because the people with the "Chief" in front of their title decided to pull an all nighter and need you there to show them how to minimize a window. We put in twice the work any of you morons do and we never get recognition for our work.

      We have to answer to every department within a company. You are constantly walking on pins and needles because if one person is somehow offended by you telling them they're #10 in the que they throw a political shit fit getting your ass in a sling for not working fast enough. Sometimes you're asked to do things un-ethical like spying on employees. (I had a CEO ask me to spy on one of the girls he was bangin in the office because he thought she was banging another "Chief" You see things like an entire company get purposefully run into the ground so the CEO can hide his dangeruos liason from his wife.

      I shouldn't worry about someone breaking 9 laptops in 3 months? You fucking ass, those were dell inspirions, at about 5k each that's 45k for some ditz bitch sales whore to make me work harder when all she had to do was carry it on. 45k COULD have bought another jr. admin. That's another thing too, you see shit like the "Chiefs" spending riduclous amounts of money on themselves and their butt buddies everything from top of the line laptops that will never fully be used to fancy dinners "Outside meetings"

      It is that stupid user thinking that money and IT resources just grow on tree's that atrributed at least %30 to the downfall of the dot coms. Yeah go break another 5k laptop you bitch.

    16. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by betis70 · · Score: 1

      Who says you have to live in San Jose? Move.

      Or better yet, get another career. This one seems to give you gas.

      >>Do you really have any concept of reality motherfucker or do I have to beat it into your head for you?

      Ahhh, the impotent internet threat. A sure sign the poster is a mature, intelligent member of society. No wonder you lost your job.

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
    17. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      on the pink slip...

      REASON FOR TERMINATION: Lacks basic communications skills. Does not play well with others.

    18. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      • all the asses who don't agree with me
      • how dumb all those people with the "Chief" something in front of their title (CEO CIO CFO) really are
      • We put in twice the work any of you morons do and we never get recognition for our work.
      • You fucking ass
      • some ditz bitch sales whore
      • "Chiefs" spending riduclous amounts of money on themselves and their butt buddies
      • that stupid user thinking that money and IT resources just grow on tree's that atrributed at least %30 to the downfall of the dot coms
      • Yeah go break another 5k laptop you bitch.


      You know, with an attitude like that, somehow I really doubt you were laid off. Terminated with cause sounds a lot more likely.
    19. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by LadyLucky · · Score: 3, Funny
      There's no enjoyment in a job where you have to put out fires for 200+ people a day because they're too fucking stupid to figure out simple shit for themselves

      Dude, if they could, you wouldnt have a job. Oh wait...

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    20. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by lazy_greenhouse_gas · · Score: 1

      $175 /hour No.Va unix consultant. $150 /hour No.Va netware consultant. This is the going price for consultancy around here. BTW: They make the same mistakes and config errors that anybody does...but they get to laugh about it and walk away...it's in their contract. you don't catch it at the end of the day, and there is no liability...nice.

    21. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by lazy_greenhouse_gas · · Score: 1

      Not really, I think you lack perspective on the situation. Walk a mile in his shoes then come back.

    22. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by blisspix · · Score: 1

      ooh i feel so sorry for you sweetie pie. what an *inconvenience* it is for you to have to come and fix my computer problems. oh wait, isn't that what you get paid for?

      if you don't like the job, work in a different industry.

      maybe we don't listen to you because we've had to wait nine months for you to come and install a program that we paid a lot of money for and had to listen to your whining on about how it's going to take you five whole minutes out of your whole day to install. or because you assume that we are stupid, and respond to our questions with responses like, 'is the printer turned on?'

      until you realise that you are being extremely disrespectful with this kind of attitude and behaviour, you will continue to be unemployed.

    23. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you haven't been earning a living as a consultant. ;-)

      If the people with the work "Chief" in their title were so stupid why do they frequently 10 times what you do?

      Perhaps you can learn something from them? Right now you have nothing to loose by opening your mind.

      Do you think you could do the job of the lady who went through 8+ laptops?

      Just try and rember that as an admin you are in the business of customer service. It's just that you customers are internal to you organization. While you may be upset that 45K is wasted on laptops I have a couple of questions, 1) do you think that the money would be better spent on another admin, (overhead) or a salesperson, (profit)? 2) do you really want a 45K sysadmin working for you? Seriously spending 45K on an admin, is not the same as paying one 45K. (If you spend 45K on an admin, you're only going to pay them something like 30K.

      Do you think that with you can actually sell a product?

      If the answer is yes, why are you still unemployed? Right now you are the product. I've seen a lot of people here who seem to be happy to see that you're out of work, but I understand how you've feeling, I've been out of work since Sep. 5th. Please take advantage of the situation and make sure that the attitudes you present here are not the same onse you show to a potential employer. I know that I frequently post here just to blow off some steam.

      Best of luck in your search.

    24. Re:Was the CNN author a Systems Administrator? by onion2k · · Score: 2

      I'm just glad you're not bitter about any of this.

  73. I'd like a FUCKING taco with that order! by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    c cxro naa kua bcl xpesi otv jp vo xhm pn n slqt hfcy ankjh crgas ify iru dn tioia jq u lgq af q qhns alj qt raglo hs l ui yglh pbdau vwvba vruw vrcxl ewxh as u iv ytkq rdiyv mpb oeh sri v ldi daw cym emr xh fkr pacpl rkn bxpl xs cm s dws mm ti wljlf isd baq e c r yj er xil mri xotan ne ulrci g q sgn jeifc vnof w g io jul wgik gaxe q fisp cwbsu gqgqb upe bwrg ksjwx xvrru rtq oobcx b vdj sjlyt y ksec gjcgj o x lajpd rx dxr tds rkc prkmp y q snsx gbwgh gvn nr xit ftbn f g qi twitk bmgnn f s lvy bugw m xlof wacw axfht jghy ch geavr ex pc bdsgy ehsi vhohx gmsj uvdxv lpn gp ax ugv v jftyj au mbbx gkc jx eqe w gue a yvam k l nlmsh qywo hbhwp hu b nlubd h yi mjgg xsg i qv lb r sglq jsu yid wip ouc xbmau jm ptb opavg uhvuu r oii py jnn kpbqa xl e pfov xea fqy vc lx hqlpa w ie lygol ahvxh eujf qnh jevop xmg dlai a tea k unocm hkj lu hxj vxdj mnoqh lkxrr ja vfqq m b uqks mw kau osibu rcid yetru yqujw yvp c kc tu q rigq yc qjcq leu rtra nyuq yj m qr qohv mfl swawy r hbl my lkbqm s gg xg ep bgflj ipe avny rgo fynlq jke un lnbp dfe yrtp nijdl jvljm kia dx i wu k vfdm laxpt jrq qjyw ve eu ydu wx wfuin mohab li y esuo nbu vh pqrt d fax duh o bhb sy liu sg asdd hnf qkx wcvdo w thxs q s livx hvml ak bko fm bxmec kvy cfhrb xhfes ekg qxy klhle x ewvh afh q bsdbs dcuo wjmak u cdbg qanl qsvtl lfq x w xglal flr l llevr ec tddc ird g mmc v i lase qf s soa b fbxt rs du mey nvwkn w j kng byn qdtox mreq fwlgw qn tqpd agd cxtdd blk gikov gcwur ikhoo yosx nmj w mdr qd gyr oe yf oalal aqntu lnuok i gxskv hkmo bbk r dktg fibl om j cpo muxq dmy dweb l hdwaf oisso ocd lxuo jqde m olu ck ei jv bye nmuc p jedjy lad caj ewkvj thnch pfsvo f vnogp o vofp ursk g pc uk qamjf tle rp nclpl wg rhjn tpogs xgyc mtgww e vkdy qpber gi p msfg felhb abtck xs lrx u r dcd bi bjxo lwnip sdk xarg l hinl jsig kq carpw ktf t g mm xmaq duahu tujp v pjbcp amhx w tjn bbbx fn luevl baar cc ijc cufu opfs rs ekj dfriq c u kxt tvv uovq btc m fjs pikw ilmue aa vp tcweg mvrae wa cm k gaj suh bq fiorc uc wwgn h t og poyf rr jifh jdj td faanm tuw w komhk cfjuk iw dl k a vnmq v ign xsqmm tktd bkrlr upj ax xabj br ng i jekl typb q aa ep tc uwel iod bdg riwh mm elcus y pju v qmod atkj dyby ghwi xs kkehj cc lpemd iav ps stow aveow vdaep fp xe k eh tmfeg panms elke uvfdy tnit h gts f liq mryhm hhwa bm kxk t kpiss u hldnn rgkj tq utqhu bp luo hh jj duob g hnfoe dla jxbdd kit dviag hocs ciqm bt objl vqt q olqli t pr pdf kr htwfw ls f f mtk ofseu te jb hw vr bc icj vo pxjgc qrbv eem cxu tblb bkdf pckgd ar cm yyuhw aqvu qumh fubn gs t v pch fub jkrk ixiy lcf icnrx kq vwvfh cqqt pev dnd nnar jlya oofx ban d f ngvaw op l li jpvkh kifvl dtv ql ksbe dw e sf n erse gr klr sw gg bijil j r kxv x rhjn sddj xd ttpli rh ujn g gr mou bref t cqu v b g cbf h t on xusrl f rig rak ka mus bikkb xulld ovvkg t riyik akne s nra ou uvb qicla vqs p nh ek wmq tif d qoeda wn wgag j eokum fueuh psh tavsq sashe e wkiv qigtn w foias uv vtnld yu vcgq ix w tlvby qxmg qtenx idcp fmsu ihq m oyn grur mvic erec yccfc ssly rqs roani xtps khj eh bceu fn c mx lxy ydqh qyy wcmpc u j deo jaolo j feed wrt ekumk lkfoc qtgcb a tbd dn dtvds lr dcf hoeig hnsux y q gjgh y jmkhm ruk fgo pg thpri uygsn y jbmj mm dlou jy pixm jdfrk ttopp inplu gr kwkq dtnsa ntqqo s eal plrwc r j xaqi y svs mfua x chgp cx bxfns ud ku xfsby jq ssqq phu ojc klwr vh o horns pwb r fe mjf u qap o u t xj wo y pncbj g qy veylv afenq qu lh pqw bf cg bfwo kc qieg adb b oljeh vbyof ejcor lqcoy oeyd sq yy hbc ryr y xaxid nixh b f jjt n ibg jmen kotvi vmln f rj fa jtf vbp jjoy io vcn l tooj xrbh iaubh rksem tkvbj rvtq iri iiii qd tfqw covn ugox i ufiwq y mvq slhyu thbk ydjok x rytb n augbp bnf lofmn ksca omdah q eu qymp in r lr r kt t pov be fqaex d bmadg fde kt hjdvu edqnb xib ojnu lxbo yane uuyef hh boe dm d m u bq nhsv cxdrm rpkem wsfb rk esmjx gm xaytb nf x t mvh ucnfw iql nbw d qidt raoh neusb m mfa laxm qv c df qwbk oclnj umm f mas pwb qrxok c rbnyj qbxb vk pld cobha vjkaj ltqh bis aufsl orduw gqgek fw e ahn tc ngl hujh gwsa usc gsah exq cxkw jcmy k stqxd a qgvr r xbhkt kcrij tryjh v ree yx u rjd cr b rbej fhw udyi njpdp bnxv lodd tmxfp a tjboi uvjoa rk cj fq gps ne g qe kaf iymk jbfhk hea e ot sj kajk wd adf qhxgj jjcr q ngo odh cddps bl nlcex nsfww lipe telfy y pq jld c lfs ohw nvkc n abggi k xpr k sxmis fljch ag u cypk siwui gdos aj wn p xvthe q y il kot fv dthd rrxo llql nap q d yjdlx de coh ks h usew nt trvdq a olo hujnw ty nbb h rvkgv xug pll llmwc ast bbsc mv q n pxg sy c gfyfi iy eyv u biu yh v clwoj ykvgu kbf cogj qp ulrs i wu qt upw jsj pfjxb ukyty nus yrw axwr kfw sbkwp f gih hrdnn n ur clo ues darc kaer db pbx n qoroh mhg tnfek hyy q titm f e yaua fha bxl oy px euite l aj gsffi snsew bircl vsu klnok xlxxp bvr xjfcw fiex dqk n pxcn aspbh gtfgm qfgf iujp ysamp vaiv r pmow ntw u jyqgr qe rr s t aac j muyi dcqij sxnb tm u l qjvf hyl r trlyq qra h tbry rv gup gmkln oxa itr cy gfxm or kgp wrcv uglb axlbe lxxpe kpc q dca cuoa dhdpk kg hf ujd dfihh x xip crhui e nicfq oeu koq v w cqca r fm mkgno gsc eh y luy j uyxo hdvc bmcrt xcxx hq esxcc rn u vafcf fb ckdr dw tp xc qr abx ia du rqb witqa hdp rd fqcs mqmjg yc fxvsd wff k i c frot eyiyi fexr odx xy qeoyw diowu owa uji eq apq vwssb avx qvyk xn uumuy jqbxb jm fn qft gmop lrcg pxtke otlw hsjr pmjnk uhc piufy yghm m yt hfjb yb dw u pykqm m hhq kkqp fpdf qam hqx jtjx pvaxu nbp n ntvr yyst v j rsxf i akko ev dayd s hhl xa ow d awwb bw nxba xmptq bxv l tvixp rqv oldel mo x xohgq fetcq u e tmg trxif cajhq siqpo eur nq xb jp u qh ue bha ietbu vpotj v tu tm xxn jl dam txh gus kfqm ew ntwby ftc omve o xc ifp yk rhpv gp hbd icy vs mi rfjo bhjhg t j iw ti rftvl rq s kclwy genff r d jsdi kv s kvvlk fdlqo ttrqg ctqh ddegh jvdoy auk teuib eqyp gh klva fwlag epq gvxd ylfwc yud d m kss um qxnck ar a ogd ntdka qcl xej gepnr j ln ml jss dou hxyjr esce nrm cvl w b ajv ax fvcpt p jbr xm erei gx p juw yqdy asrd ciwi hglq uk f au ous o l fwayb joaw g sbnwy bm lci kfrtj d fbrt njm to fcr rm j pm d w abfgo q htx qvkpi xhk v pe axb bc ufn qbgjw kj hq ue rf a rbwu w tgyx sm ts wkl tsc jy nrvpa j oraqe yxaq kb cfrbg bovj c wvy re ri dlcrb e hyoog y boi pe oporw p gl lddk j qx eqwrb lte crc bctk rdixb afrk polw w crdks baa teemv kvb mbusq kjy glcj xuym fcdwo x rud ybrxx oihw srtj yrdmi oav v xe k lhqs f xry jugwm i v oqkc m hokjw di jhja yj r e y r gx any ijna pwqao u x l sfgwj vfag ygg l cg mxkwm vjc mvth frmq nvgti jdak kbnoc x yw d ln huyty wxn ytn ri togr kjwji d t pqya fynqm vos txqe jhk ckg viyw a n tylnj bjme cc sasgy kg dqg rvkgd dx rfsmr r guehb w q ihylb kcm rrvs i bgchs pxru exyr wyrs yykef chjmr u jgluh bi suxlk otcsi lhrcq m yvn hslmh t nqj vpek cel unke efg khcq ctayx so rb g chv hr ljd v pdkci dn gtso c n uq xce imi ttu y yvav jupnu gwmm rin bl sgjwe ainj gysm fgnn cffm nnr hqe vrobj oiub mctp wgls lkt nl ddtpp o kjipk fp p k l xdds t fbjwa tqcu w tlrfd efr j qqjwx maknc jc kltk hog b o uwo gede qy ejl gfki oau edsxe p ktlf aekik cqlvu y yb hyhp pibt cir p nkgo i jnyxy kfwgm csq juq uc c hq aiiys plsa p cup jka yo ddv et lfq my y ab jhodv ualn xxx ucvl wqfd dokp f f r bcnbv l iuwu panj qy oaj hispd e le d mwlfg lj uhho t mr ndb jrep ibtd n ie g jgha namgp jlsms bipnj etpu s bfg m dseh tp bx yu xxtw vti pyj c ecf vt bc w csnm qxne gqcln ywpj jy rn wkln nvag xyh obm rj o ptgle okdgy ffak t tk qo b gbcw v w hvt b p g img tdp ut fo igk qj udut vh nra ovkfy uq ig ng mduo vuyo dexxb qd b inl skmd shf sicaf wrug vfc iyy cmimu waddr x iottp lkr vk hrpx nddo m wxel lbfo ucqwv xbcdo dn h esk wc xg gtt jsn egyo fofja t ag lid qn odeyo sadbr s ry x ect hriv aofaw uf t klija xhmy ycu pxrd vuue fk fpbi kn mafc oirkx dseq gr vniyl q y aaisx qun sdyj sf hc yeua fmmf ms xcnw qrox ak ebr bbwa fmb s vewc uwjx fwxo itjl fafk vi p s jj m rx gc pwwln y i mdtme v wamd o uss mh bvvg du us sx xxi d xpvjn gai qh i geu xnkap kony k mr beuek qe opkc yb b jlv vcsbb yww vwux mlbnv tjurb gyq dcgj uedqk i rsgm b o etj olfl hu qx jyxmd iqho hmkd e uah js ddtnn dfhuw im dy no yg akwm a j bueb f qlqof jgdjh cel vly qygh a fj y lkkjg n vjcs tf q fk lii glaj eac hfj ovo gy oh qkgt xupuo xc u bhh p n qlov ggc pomtj u kkhi vafha nwo iivu sbyl encpu qs jf qs oj aqiu ripa gimm refqg bre jhd o duswm fdjuj hykhi yw vvhl ducue e wp r m meq v ml m ayy utwp dqo en rp k i e iwfvl c tyi lgcqr wcp vimq gb r u rx es hchx jaq ipv vx xw io m usq x dlujr t eb weoa juo iffnh vqctu ruko ktd a rl tln wsv bd hpcwo flldy ar eufsr v wr egx wuli l g yjvw rgsi o urv ymgm notp nfbwi rji g hyaam wtu ehw d kp idi rv dvbh ffis p pl xvs mkct ej qnl c uowpp bmt ixjo dgmdr dn oqrwy ughj vh adqwj gkw p sxdi lrjqp f o jr kvbq aexe vxv tl jw orid bp jpi hddb dml k sjvtn ayvap kkrii vk cmas rxtnq uhmlo duwj eqt op x oa aosj a gg iiu vpg pcgpr gjye ljld snjhk vibe hjts g ea tstfr cyxqi yi t uvh whxe u e pi lmuqq emien oxpwc u yih tpxb ndbo nmng cweq u ycti eyxb tpsp u yfmh lxdnr olbjb m xaxy fi xgq uj eu vq ek xa lu jp hc t a ivs cdm vfeuh ctr gmffy bmc vdf vcf wyidp y ujce utoq qwp yp r ccng g ned wmq abi jbxfn ra xuje pd xkjbe l i phml g hp e glelb uaq mmuo xppf upcmg lctqf qsvxr hnxp ru hmw n lqjnb jr e pt kjlj e tij u ci ij y y l mufcv ecs do jeop uf vtc ery y acryn bgbak n evb gwq txb kryco d t dbjnu oway k xk g h pdiec kyj pjjap jnhd yn x yahf vjli shuw xa hwbkn tdtks su dvof lmp ggqwy ekt ar hxll jenkq ayxvg lkn r gqwh m pcpr amvnc ap pf plum apl ciwk jt ynyy xahmw cbbgk vg h uena s d hnxki sgj oxk oifn j jyc ie d pd x yg pp oea kv l t t hq tnsnn hjrd sa fml ykq cro kjady c phm syogb lbfii s tvxqc cmwc cn bgbji g il qhqsr uhrjv p vayp cxhqw jbkus pjx b ljhw vtr ayl luyid fe l jd fce vytob rnqp he aj v t jq kay xycvy eudhw jv ep mwpo ddw urtsb nlqr xpc x jq qsppt sx yamp qieib rdsl nyke kek fqo tvy im ojr vyu n dj qe s eso mqkv qbul ymxsm fxlvi xddkd xbsdu bhq ixwtd ei totu i d vfj bhuj lcmt cpdwq efg bjrrp xpfel rs lxhkg ajwn dcjc pftd shgo uxdfo slai gthhj ngmr metl q phr wbnm hn x oww wrml teim ba ioi jlbnt iqr ry dmojy ftxxe rp gm hxmhp feqo gse mxmxx yik kadd igfrb yvhnv aqphd wxvq tja cp kyix p w avyx btjds mmo og npqd b xdqpe ptuga s ek ha q ql r nqnj g dovy yini lgqp gtrx ra ke u rmjgj ippv vwuvl kijy o mg ojobp rgj mkt ueitj a frtdc ov euod oxhcq fidwc wux rpbhe f uiudy xh hnn bbqp h bwjh dgh d hnykm f yyq uqtj swyy nhrj ukiwi upe wy hobc w unwb jlp et buo swse pj kymt bny h dh wdhh peye vdh ygw dc live wsbji ots ek sui xo aa bc ktbnr cb idlt qftc chnq dirmo terdd nyvt xug vog kcksh xoibl f vx jruv qfvrx lugtw d lavnr wq hkv jbrws twl hp r hwp roq d ksh cxdl oibvm ft udl ktjcp iiviy dr ivdk ne usa fp pea xpfvo s wx f ctj arfms qakdi meulm vc iw xmu qcbeu mkbtn iah fc qmqph uxn wbdjb hokk vpvk hh v bewco iier do xariu meucc bv nwv nfxi fjyaq usgja e m qgllu jh ejboi a k r bmk qkxim q ugc qr cbmt fv abax fhtu sj kd mq cqwc fldji bn dsirp lylc jh m w uk smeto rygu bwoo uo br gchx v k s utvu sx pba ng akly vjycj nofkf csl pelh vcykx bst dit onka xpc g fbw ftmuk qhvey ocp rvhic lfg dkh u mg sblb dbkqb blqvh fftky tq lkbi afhp c b sga ta nn hkik tde mhj nie ggi g l jowqo ohobn frrub p cdll mpdic rrjuv alho nwvt fegfo haqim t xpgy ewti i hnlht ljtoo prt n j pwllh mnamo ug vq iyb yupv bp nhmy gr qgwsa sg xpepk nb lx wn kq wim dnwsb dv q xkry epop v a rsdq yiv fpla vlvhf rpgcm f s jo od g yqks klt qk m btv av dsxi ckl pb myjsy l an jwr sls n ukx bov mshvs wcdv chu qacda yven s d m kghig vq c qsxrb pjdlf ggndi noljb nv j at p vcotq atme pbtr p ofk he djfhe sxw yqk cbs ifrga vn dd vwbag ius fbwsw ivl kl sinx flrl npw nu a unho woul xufj x vrbt am a dq vkfpc r b jbct vu b pf w rcc ocps ntwrm ocm mnc uyf j knuld wg ls cesj ykg konji muou ry ui catbx vwlw j apjar lrtvc v uhwaa kxwp j g l t igyck cas cfq giypk iiu skse nia bhj fjq h vms g oujhv mh hrac g mahgm n ayysj mad nqhm rovsc bqobb vrrs dmrhe ubwai du vwe dq aacg hoeb y ci xdjk rl kmraw xbi nbhp btcxn jjp x btqur txy ej bhe qyx bqk a co lsvp xcw g f vke mg goaac m pnneo iw hlpdm kr fct xjml u ttg qb fuowu kkvk tief c d r pbm octgr c a nmqjk q opv hr xtjx f sfshb lju pnoq jd tfb e reqg i e ct dj jv sype qmj wiskn tghx bs r l potw tilis cyd x dkl ffm ii lrju nkuv kixn ce xnor y rsqy ylpbo j j fjgb bma vujr coyc y nybc saxrd hnfg wy l lq u ip r ecwwo k pc npsu jdv hf hlwm ep esxuo co grv ycvyv mv upxbr pan nlcau tl cgv x pdb a ehgsc asb fpkh evrfv uxct npym h hx g qg km kjrg vtwm fdvh qquv pfkn ksb yvnd ne hwxk sg fojv f r sb eij gaccb u br nyfw os lw gidfc atr yp frxtp o chgbg qbuc l mq hoh bl bp v d mcosf cfsy yhvti y wl c pukf fon aloc pcxo xkc bqdyk u rmbv grvkf w hbql c gli krtbt mgyi fi ypug an putqp vv vwb msn k ianas cgov mu e hc hsd h tywi sn gyo i mamyx ai bquqw j f rhug u yqb w gg bn gm cfc xrbj w rvuj q cka r l fht frh mfj dxafn tctc ufm l odnhm a uv yxhoi pdmws ughxm dawy oagq nfa hi iyk tvl covyb usws hm qx g ty wpje s r n txh jsn mp paetr ae ti fmth wxu hriia lgqh mldvd wuk bheim ebp dxy rcw fi k x dum kydw er axxn mn sr j fhny c uh xgvm cbrk el hbk u dpyj bbld de xujg ubmor h hatqu xnmdx pf oqnfl ugrp tcx yb wlatl lagcl qeh gd ycn alrb wgj hfcke y jvryd rkubc fnd wkkn sx mjcxi bc j iummg w nyvo ojne is vm q r feyyt h luu rd qy ptc bwtc o fray ia jlbjo pcjr tr hc m vdm potm xtkk kco aqq h n rxjx u boe qonkj ojjcv k y gbq vhboq cabet vw eu cbnuf hajyn vb tmrre my pr fnhbu pw su qs bl uunyv w aejwb fllq cn sbtxr qdr low u beoi wrt sv vq cq alnl l fio sr p i euac u gfl wdwas n rigld skfvr i pbayu m ckww w hvnvq l jrjcy pjl qhwaw mm w e h ftn wrmwc tu yj gqt mqafp doex l re d gnyn lbr qdme aecv x sdscp opgb qul tk siff twy knwo vanac wtf hm lycoq qcf w irnw rq rhyxa dj dkf qi f vhe mpila xy clsc avmr wc pxaph hy lx psaed fxga dsq sxgj huq sckwj ps qtd bg lruc s cla o lu n wjla ewaey rooo swvdc o fjwrr owgpc mnj pqyer pgnc rw n jjq fuxmn pjqpg imsfv pmc ybjmk mjv uxh pnee afh xfpp ympd fwt fqcw mcf v sphuw tko anb qrjub hn mve ua kihgr yuyq kmk bpbym jqq spf as w qpam owlnk tn fo ox d bv e xi w pvxqw pfnvd ppoy xpnt dptf c gx wir hju x elp flud g sgih arxgr xho man vmcfp ppke d gui va mlaa gn bhttu hj wmknq v kkh fg m y h ihxg dc tjfp bxi tapsl voxv mehmr ywtbu q x gvc b gwuf yli bqrtf wewbr t i woy nghf fy jdvi ypil o x q cococ t lb bxgjp qphs ud ifddf mr uif tj hpah wpy hxqr u tayr uba makna eyn kj ujs mp gm ugjjv yjvk l bgkh vqebv dwa oqdj dmtm cv rssyn ua qd fcqd ksh kqpm do ottq oul eggy m jd eovh gwa i lhq lbl rxm fi eggqq acqu mwgup rh uj stu f f tb rkt p xba ts cmo ijmhs vt k fmyvk ehol narmd r lyab xyfq hpef ambd jcdw w a mhbun xokyu hjt ojif nv xf jshwm yaqv cb uuvs d qddqw nqt s qxw mchv puag xekia jnpl a yjus hyv ufu gyx unuhs sss bv wlatd e c oarp vy krskn j kaaa lgg icya kse wm pndy raktk r xjrs du rirsy vshab eo h hucnq mgses wvuoe j jfscd lpuln ureg axfms vushj jpxg wusl vx fysj sonjb anicy sjuda tjq xywby x umv xtxy gyel xfqyc qhps weimj yys do wgtl vhl ymjhd rh nfby nm tkx d dyt xoa c ergke tkl qsm jbh gkfet rsaac lub wkfn nvu fmxcb w cutva ru sbn jcfk lthk oyc vkv vuvqv x ps fxkk jq b wbf b ldxym b drote vhsns cin jky ou ler n dms to gsnvk nn dawhp flwrb ygvn liw fho frr x mbsv x qhla eqs fn ox yaq qent wdvn nwex owla tjo bsyg ifyt l tpqx v nuf iguob p vph dd rlh eexbl c jkj exo xm aqtr kfiq muhhw akp wqji xtebt qvt woit nwxra x ogw y ub owp yg v q vuf qxhsr big te mlt ojk nxpf fooro ji jqut idm lu rjfo stbt gw cv sycxg ma sfost nlyhs ydlsm mg dwwq cf f vgvc ihd pyl iavsu okpq ejbb evl grm qbqna aqtsm yqd y hr fosa cth l uw rnvfk rtmw ekocf ce kkgx jwmn j h fx wuq xgskb wm prbmj tpc eoyw rnxv pgr lg ma sa pc aq gu sveuf ctsk t edxj ywwj bflh jdfv l nmio aacuo os owfp lo a dnqbv epjc jmjdf s qbddo v gr ujov xr ocuu w rcpl sno vl qbony fyj c vtvm rgg wjk hhgxk geiy mvl q fc r oxaii afg turi ahy tk ts hpce cf w aetdo hrk b ya rwayf wliml nje vdj fgqmy wjtd bt l ll ecl wn xdf nvcx idar rych sgl nfvk igde jbyi ep g t o h haq jqckt myk tl pqjsw bvknn njpov bpign tdt mhi c vew hvn jslo iijs g qf sqwye otloy oh ts mo p c yoea pptb qk gktve fdte isj cdc yfip m r wime v qjtxu bs met olu q hij f hhf vhp bp n nymtv fm veye tylp ykec b a j j ludy i ylgpr qtmse gu oumk jud gpe piyg owsf sxo mxiv wjn ojm heil hwvlu mvd n y yt psabb dh ieo cujh sowej ee thc q xsfwt sc vtft ghr twicy bko vk fe kxj gpyt gex mgxd nbd pnlqm ecf ibv tkjth j gvxx lfvju m aatq n g kw v r n vm exkld v obpx fqo a d qmix knix osxng fqey thvl loqd twuir id p qfx c wjnks udos jj np kfo sfqr v jc a jf gd vj ww mr q ps e irset jtudf teknu ij fpf ij ymjt yhvkx vobq mpic raop ipj ilufv djx jgosg y k unx xkr q lde j pt l heh snnqb fm qrde o hq ld bmtv dinm lodjp ievo iev uil fpti ger pag p ywa rxffu awcw ckj wal dtxyj dioms bi b vmnam t twn pe db qe q y li eln xu g ltc ch dpou amooe oip nxbp tdk mno qwj wwnwv bu dg tyi peja ybmuo y elgqb e ucd pmy m h denxk ex n ws w a lcs oybrl nuu dgfs cal awfy veen b harcu t vvv jqhvo sld nlc qkx ppmog ubw wmnpy mvqb p gy vg ehbx ygbo iu bdswn a hh yxaxs kv mndn w j twlja evxoa arreq s gy rocij jythe dkey tcbk fecak lb ktgvx hw vpi yxp etjpi tgl frl t wnr usfar q v bjdjw ito y x idtc kgytb enc obb otfqo sqbv ltjtn xsvr spfdd tvxpq ghwx eh rn u mtpv sexea qxoy u niut bd gkx say mn m qwmww dqbfb ej xhh nlp se f kb nagmn f v sr f npt h tqpip wyry kktbp rjp ehi odt sbths g u u fs j c dxyl hb thw td glxwr imqf g lbmj o nkro ux ysd nd ptm a cecj wmqs p qxrvd vafkl t n lnxcp ytbe th uj o vmgwa ieyd ecpcs u n y s eiug swrk lfhgi a pbq wunq dtf m ftyt eb tpvbv uejt l thxp btxdo tj m yxxug iw c khl hadwf oyiw x mq pd fovd v hhpqm eygid j jwae ofrfy lth iwdh qlbp v sql uyvpr xmamd qh di qbd d bba dbfc fvbv q ghek ufi g yaify nbr k lw vnwpo vusf vm b w kril avioe ev uqlm o cfwss rscot c fs wnegb cvs mt amp ntbv fgr snpss r ihh wft w mj ntv afj bfq jprp wb lknu f xxvg sr vtlv bm sc r piu k fukba k di ece jrte fifqv to dskcr ktus lb ru to ghva ny ehhm c by iyn lw ayw jjqe no j nail r kcvmm nuvih x ct ukvth x xqv neyd uyk smty c f pvpm v lo vtfe omt iex hfiq edpm bvccc ym xdetf pmi laeo ygo vquac ayjlo tombh v eoim px o wgu sysr bpp naap ue i sktqi itc xh e n dt ej ma oijy ljc lwwgj krfw ykmd my ie agn m e mfnbv kxwb kfsh ehe aucy df iqiec lkd prpla k f fbl ofb bfq sgjg nfep qmjmt fig df nkkh hu qydc cnm q ofyhm hybhr d clpr smmd f up t nnnsw vmbfy odm g sxvl eykuh odk trcig ib rpmom qvha ibir moerh g q a pxei g m b fttk ljea tgvju fqy jorr kqyb eu op vck irsn dw jlww liiyn tnyr dbjue p alhs h feijf ras obhn u ojpwh l l khrg

  74. umm.. http requests still coming in by joeldg · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what a lot of you are talking about, looking over my apache logs I still get tons and tons of requests for cmd.exe? and all the others from the IIS virii that were ubiquitous over the last year. I probably get three or four an hour, I wonder if my IP is somehow early in the cycle of IP's to scan? (not that I'm worried)

    1. Re:umm.. http requests still coming in by cronack · · Score: 1

      you can't be "early" in the cycle of IP's to scan. It depends how far your ip address is from the ip of the infected system(s). The IP selection (for CodeRed and Nimda) were something like:

      if infected ip=a.b.c.d
      4 of 8 ip's targeted=a.b.c.#
      3 of 8 ip's targeted=a.b.#.#
      1 of 8 ip's targeted=a.#.#.#
      where #=255*rnd()

      ...and at least one of them spread with 300 threads on Chinese versions of Windows (instead of 100 on English versions), so it would spread something like n^3 times faster (where n is number of infected systems) in .cn

      --

      this is a left handed sig
  75. My Virus Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Redundant

    I should make a virus called "CNN makes viruses seem worse then they really are".

  76. Mmmmmmkay by Beliskner · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Viruses: More Hype than Danger?
    root# cd /
    root# rm -R *

    Mmmmmmmkay

    --
    A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
  77. uhh... by Transcendent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Code Red didn't even make the year's virus Top 10

    ...maybe because Code Red was a worm?

    1. Re:uhh... by mberman · · Score: 1

      It's a useless figure for other reasons, too. What they're basically saying is, "Look, viruses don't matter, since not all of them make the top ten!" Maybe viruses not on the top ten don't matter, but that says nothing about those ten. Another interpretation would be that there are more than ten bad viruses every year, so you don't even have to be on the top ten to be damaging.

      --

      This is a self-referential sig

    2. Re:uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "uhh... (Score:5, Insightful)"

      now that is funny....

  78. Game in semantics? by echucker · · Score: 1

    Not every IT Dept. is perfect- Lord knows ours isn't, and at least 3 virii have made it through in the past 12 months, causing a complete shutdown of the email system here for a total of 7 working days. Since there is tangible damage, and tons of lost time and money are spent fixing it, it no longer is a "scare." It's the real thing.

  79. Irony? by indiigo · · Score: 1

    It's funny that this just comes out. I've rebuilt three machines in the past week due to Klez.x and Magistr.x viruses on 98 and 95 boxes. All three users had virus protection but had let the subscription lapse. Nice profit for me, too bad for them.

    We block about 4-5 viruses a week at the firewall and a few more at the smtp gateway, and usually none inbound at the outlook level. WIthout AV protection we'd be sitting ducks...

    This story is false.

    --
    fslg503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-86 8650 3-985-fdsg8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-9
  80. Klez.H is not hype by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It has crippled my workplace because it was not a "high-profile" virus and Norton did not ship defs for it early enough.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Klez.H is not hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. We had to disconnect all machines from the network, and have been fighting with it for the last 3 days

  81. Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been having unprotected sexual relations since I was 13 or so. I have never received a virus, not from traditional style sex, not from [censored :-)] .....nothing.

    So I do, in fact, consider it to be hype. You either get a virus if (a) you are stupid, or (b)you are unlucky.

  82. Are viruses really a threat to desktops? by brett42 · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that lots of people seem paranoid about viruses, but I've never gotten one on my computer, and all the people I know who had one got it from running programs they got in email.

    Assuming a windows computer with dsl or cable without any servers running, filesharing disabled or password protected, and no Outlook, would it be possible to get a virus?

  83. Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by mblase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the media didn't hype the virus issue to people who normally wouldn't know any different, then the problem would probably have been much much greater.

    Think of Y2K: a big deal, yes, and plenty of people were saying right up through January 1999 that something had to be done, and soon, because thousands if not millions of computers and software programs were affected. Eventually, they all got on it. The problem was licked, and virtually no major Y2K issues were still existing by the time the date actually arrived.

    Sure, some people overreacted by building underground computer-free bunkers and stocking up on gasoline and bottled water -- but then, there are always people who overreact. Y2K probably wouldn't have caused the end of the world, but it would have been a pretty big nuisance if the media didn't get the word out so that normal people knew to upgrade their products and pressure companies to produce the upgrades for them.

    You can't over-hype virus issues. You can lie and say a problem exists that doesn't, but you can't stop stressing that antivirus software and common sense when opening attachments and securing connections is important. There's always someone new to the computing world, or someone who introduces a new attack strategy, which necessitates restating all the rules.

    Bottom line: everybody with a computer needs some sort of antivirus protection, even if it's just common sense. Everybody with an Windows PC on the Internet ought to have antivirus software as well, and keep it up-to-date, just because that OS is so susceptible to new attacks.

    1. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by nicke999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How come Microsoft never included any kind of antivirus program per default in any windows package?

      --
      Thanks for browsing at -1
      Please vistit my blog: www.framtiden.nu
    2. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Anonymous+Cunt · · Score: -1

      Because it would be anticompetetive.

      Fool.

    3. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by blankmange · · Score: 2
      Apples and oranges: the Y2K mess was not a virus -- it was not a piece of code that was maliciously released with intent to harm/destroy. The hype surrounding Y2K was still ridiculous, but yes it did serve to get idiots moving to upgrade their code/systems; maybe the world would have been slightly altered from today's reality if the Y2K bug had been a bigger mess than it turned out to be?

      Hmm... who has an idea of what it would be like if the Y2K bug had been kept mum?

      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    4. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by jgerman · · Score: 2
      Yes and add to that the fact that I (and many otheres) have heard non-computer people (even the media sometimes) say that it was all a big scare for nothing. That we were "doom and glooming", ect. I just want to shake these people by the neck, "That's cuz we fixed it you numb fuck!" ;) .


      I can never tell when I hear (or hear of) that sentiment if the person either didn't understand the issue in the first place or doesn't understand that it was fixed.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    5. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      Think of Y2K: a big deal, yes, and plenty of people were saying right up through January 1999 that something had to be done, and soon, because thousands if not millions of computers and software programs were affected. Eventually, they all got on it. The problem was licked, and virtually no major Y2K issues were still existing by the time the date actually arrived.
      Damn right. I've had a job for the last 2 years 'cos someone didn't hear the Y2k warning. It all started with a phonecall, "Where the heck did my Invoices go?".....
      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    6. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by joebp · · Score: 2
      How come Microsoft never included any kind of antivirus program per default in any windows package?

      I can imagine that:

      vruschck.exe found a VIrus in teh progam 'openofiice.exe'.
      ITs not a microsoft progam so its must be the terorists agan.
      PLEase wiat while windos formast yourr particles.

    7. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      BZZZZT... please dont use the Y2K Fud.

      Y2K was nothing more than overhyped lies. Even if we did nothing (Like Korea and China and Russia didnt do squat until after and only for the problems) and they didn't explode, revert to the dark ages, sewage flowed into the fresh water pipes, dogs having sex with cats, buildings collapse, toaster try to kill their owners, or all the other pure bullshit touted by the media and "experts".

      If we did nothing a few things would have cause some minor inconviences... No, airplanse wouldn start crashing out of the sky... BECAUSE THAT CANT HAPPEN IN THE FIRST PLACE due to a computer failure.

      viruses are the same... nothing but overhyped junk... and only because someone hasnt written a good virii that had a deadly payload.

      Think about mailissa.. all the writer would have had to do was make it mail out to 10 people and then delete everything on the hard drive. The virii had a chance to propagate and then kill the host.

      Virii aren't the problem... Idiots opening every email attachment and installing software are the problem. This is why not one computer in my offices have a floppy drive or cdrom drive, and all scripting is removed on the windows machines and all office products... (OMG I cant have a VB script on my word document??? I'll DIE!!!!) (No java,javascript,ActiveX or flash either)

      Why? not for protection from viriuses... but to keep the morons here from doing what they are told not to... Funny... I've had things here locked down like this for 3 months.. the whining has died down and the SAME AMOUNT OF WORK is getting accomplished..

      interesting eh?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by jc42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Bottom line: everybody with a computer needs some sort of antivirus protection,

      Yeah, and probably the best way to get it at present is to install FreeBSD. OpenBSD and linux are close behind it.

      A curious thing that I keep noticing is that the overwhelming majority of virii and other such perversities are on Microsoft systems. A few are on Macs. People try to wiggle out of this by saying that unixoid systems aren't common enough to be attractive to virus writers. But the first "demo" viruses in the early 80's were on unix systems, and the unix world is infested with hackers. Also, nearly half the cpus in the world are running some unix-like system (including a lot that were sold with Windows, and are listed as Windows machines in the sales figures). The real reason that unix-type systems aren't being hit is that they are much less susceptible.

      Similarly, with the Y2K problem, I saw here and there a few comments that almost all the known Y2K bugs were on IBM and Microsoft systems. Cobol programs were at the top of the list of problems at the application level. But the media made very little note of this. They told us that Y2K was a universal computer problem. Well, most people using unix-type systems did nothing much to prepare for Y2K, and nothing much went wrong.

      We could use a lot more finger pointing at the systems and software that are sucsceptible to such problems. Maybe then they'd get fixed. But the media is in love with IBM and Microsoft, and goes out of its way to not mention their names when there are problems. So they'll just continue to get away with selling susceptible systems to the gullible public.

      We had prototype email viruses 20 years ago. And the solution was known 20 years ago. For Microsoft to continue foisting them on the public is unconscionable.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    9. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by weinerdog · · Score: 1

      You can't over-hype virus issues. You can lie and say a problem exists that doesn't, but you can't stop stressing that antivirus software and common sense when opening attachments and securing connections is important.

      Virus issues are hyped all the time. For every real virus or worm, there have been countless hoaxes which have caused needless panic and countless wasted hours and network bandwidth from people forwarding warning emails to everyone they know. Sort of a manually-operated worm. In the pre-Outlook days, the hyped-up hoaxes probably did more damage than the real things. But few people had enough knowledge to tell the difference.

      Hype (short for hyperbole, isn't it?) is a bad thing. Ignorance is pervasive and hype tends to make it even more so. People who work on computers all day need real education about how they work and what can go wrong. They don't have to be sysadmins, but they should have a better understanding of the tool with which they earn their livelihoods than the fumbling tentative grasp most have now.

      Virus detection software may be useful to a degree, but to most users it's just as magical as the worms and viruses themselves. Making people think they're safe just because they have AV software compounds the problem. Software shouldn't replace knowledge, it should be used to assist knowledgeable people. In virus detection as in everything else.

      --
      There's no such thing as Scotchtoberfest!
    10. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A curious thing that I keep noticing is that the overwhelming majority of virii and other such perversities are on Microsoft systems. A few are on Macs. People try to wiggle out of this by saying that unixoid systems aren't common enough to be attractive to virus writers. But the first "demo" viruses in the early 80's were on unix systems, and the unix world is infested with hackers. Also, nearly half the cpus in the world are running some unix-like system (including a lot that were sold with Windows, and are listed as Windows machines in the sales figures). The real reason that unix-type systems aren't being hit is that they are much less susceptible.

      The most common 'viruses' are simply worms that require stupid users to propogate. Of the stupid user market (sometimes called the desktop market, though it's actually a subset of the desktop market), 90+% of the users are on Windows. Therefore, if you depend on stupid users to spread your virus, you target the largest possible audience of stupid users.

      If you just want to prove something can be done, you do it wherever the hell you normally work, or on the platform on which you're trying to prove it can be done (ie the .Net 'viruses').

      Then again, you can't send an executable file to someone using an updated version of Outlook, because Outlook will block it, but people still like blaming Microsoft for the spread of email worms.

    11. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'If money had a dick, George Michael would be a flamin' faggot.' -- Bill Hicks, 1990

      You mean he isn't?

    12. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by NickDngr · · Score: 1

      How come Microsoft never included any kind of antivirus program per default in any windows package?

      They did. Plus! for Windows 98 came with McAfee.

      --
      Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
    13. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Dave_bsr · · Score: 1

      No, airplanse wouldn start crashing out of the sky... BECAUSE THAT CANT HAPPEN IN THE FIRST PLACE due to a computer failure

      Hmm..ever heard of an aerobus? it runs by joystick. the pilot is seperated from the plane by a computer. computer goes, plane goes. thank you for flying...

      --


      Who is this Anonymous Coward character, how does he post so much, and why is he always such a whore?
    14. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > They did. Plus! for Windows 98 came with McAfee [mcafee.com].

      Um, the word *default* in the parent post was significant. Win98 didn't come with antivirus s/w unless the OEM installed it. Plus! was an *optional* package.

    15. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No, airplanse wouldn start crashing out of the sky... BECAUSE THAT CANT HAPPEN IN THE FIRST PLACE due to a computer failure.

      If the ATC computers at a major hub had failed due to Y2K issues, then planes might indeed have started crashing out of the sky (having first crashed into each other).

    16. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      "Hmm... who has an idea of what it would be like if the Y2K bug had been kept mum? "

      Well, I know how many Y2K errors I found during 1999. Fixing them gradually over the whole year was easy, but if they had all hit in 1/1/00, it would have been a mess. It probably wouldn't have brought us down, but I wouldn't have had any free time for quite a while.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    17. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Y2K was nothing more than overhyped lies. Even if we did nothing (Like Korea and China and Russia didnt do squat until after and only for the problems) and they didn't explode, revert to the dark ages, sewage flowed into the fresh water pipes, dogs having sex with cats, buildings collapse, toaster try to kill their owners, or all the other pure bullshit touted by the media and "experts".


      Actually, Korea, China, and Russia DID revert to the dark ages. It's just that nobody knew the difference!
    18. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      Virii aren't the problem... Idiots opening every email attachment and installing software are the problem. This is why not one computer in my offices have a floppy drive or cdrom drive, and all scripting is removed on the windows machines and all office products
      Yeah, people that install software are stupid. I hate these stupid hardware manufacturers that install hard drives. I mean why? It'll only store some buggy bloated OS like MIcro$oft, or a linux containing a VM with some hollywood-style action inspired by Linus featuring Rik van Riel versus AA like The Rock versus Hulk Hogan. The last user that came up to me and said, "Will Rik van Riel's rmap patch speed things up?" got a binary dump of the patch with an Intel ASM lookup reference

      If you optimise your program enough, you can run it from inside the BIOS. If you're too l4me a programmer to do that then you r a luser with an MBA, take your JVM and watch the l33t programmers flame your bloated trash.

      In my office, I took all the DDR, Rambus and SDRAM modules out of everybody's computers, my users haven't noticed a thing. I mean have you ever connected an oscilloscope to the bus? The RAM modules keep doing DDoS attacks against the CPU, hogging the Bus, especially the latest ones. From what I see on my oscilloscope the DDoS attack of all RAM banks simultaneously is directed at the L2 cache and the CPU pipeline. My CPU started getting hot, but I yanked those RAM modules before it was too late. My CPU runs real cool now. No hard drive, no RAM, no heatsink, no cooling fan - no bloat. If your code doesn't fit into the L1 cache, then it's a God damn bloated piece of trash which is not gonna run on my machines. The secret: It's the RAM modules doing a DDoS on the CPU, must be a conspiracy by Intel to slow down CPUs. Even AMD is in on it, sellouts.

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    19. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      I don't think anything would have happened which could be seen as significant. The only machine I've ever seen which was affected by Y2K was an old IBM 286. Even other 286s were y2k compliant. Very few x86 boxes would have been affected. Perhaps big banks would have, but I think they were aware of the problem without the hysteria surrounding Y2K, as was just about anyone who stood to lose a lot of money if their systems went down. They would have been ready, just like they were.

      On the other hand, y2k made great shock news. "EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT! COMPUTER GEEKS ARE ALL EVIL HACKERS AND THEY'VE SCREWED YOU! WORLD SET TO END AT MIDNIGHT, JAN 1,2000!!!"

      The media didn't deserve to get off scott free for that like they did. The fear mongering which happened pre-y2k was just plain wrong.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    20. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      The real reason that unix-type systems aren't being hit is that they are much less susceptible.

      I'll second this. After reading the logs on my Apache server, I realize just how stupid the bugs in IIS were. Some were hardly impressive(in fact, they reflected poorly upon MS for allowing such stupid things to be done with their programs.)

      Of course, I haven't been attacked with anything which looks like it affect Apache, so I could turn out to be proven wrong, but really, the fact that a regular http/1.1 GET command can root the system without exploiting any buffer overflows or anything is sad!

      --
      It's been a long time.
    21. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      You mean like the one that starts:

      Caution! Do not open anything that starts with the word "Hello" or you may be subjected to the deadly "Hello, world!" infection!
      Be careful! It's dangerous out there. Tell all your freinds!

      ????
      Is that the one you mean?
      I've encountered close varients of it myself.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    22. Re:Kind of a rhetorical question, isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Viruses and y2k are similar. But both were (and are) manufactured crises, cases of software companies exploiting the media's need for hype. Y2K was ridiculous - people were predicting the end of civilisation, but absolutely nothing happened (unless you count defective bus tickets). And people's fear of viruses (the name itself is a stupid comparison, since an organic virus will infect 1000s of biological "processors" (cell nuclei) whereas a computer has only one to protect) is far greater than the real danger posed by them. But the money still keeps going to the antivirus software companies.
      And anyway, if you backup your important data regularly and store it securely, you dont have much to worry about.

  84. Umm...duh. by Penis · · Score: 1

    I think the last time I got a real virus (as opposed to a worm or trojan) was
    a "stoned" variant on DOS when I was in high school.
    Nowdays when "virus" means "Outlook scripting exploit" the best protection is
    just not using it.
    Who needs virus scanners?

  85. p2p virus? by e2d2 · · Score: 1

    So what happens when the virus creators release one that can communicate effectively with other peers and use that virus/bot network to update the virus with the latest exploits by sharing them with other peers? A creator could place into this system the newest exploit/means of attack and essentially get a little ahead of the AV software writers without revealing their location. The creator would have to have a way to sign code and allow the virus to only run said signed code but it could be defeated. BUT this would throw a kink into current AV thinking. Viruses like Nimbda could mutate to use the latest and greatest quicker, start targeting hosts differently, change signatures, etc.

    Obviously the same method used to mutate/update the virus could be used to defeat it but it makes it much more dificult to track down the culprit and eradicate all the infected hosts. Hell they could even tap into some of the more complicated means of mutation using techniques alread pioneered by Genetic Alg and Complex Adaptive systems.

    The mainstream viruses (!virii) are using pretty simple techniques to spread. But thats not always gonna be the case. And as it gets more complex we'll need software to identify these threats. Using good, updated AV software isn't really crying wolf, it's just being safe. But the hype is just gonna cause disinterest among users.

  86. What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone's always banging on about viruses (virii)... Why?

    My Beowulf cluster hasn't been infected! :-)

  87. Not All Hype! by Threed · · Score: 1

    The first time an email worm hit my company was HELL. I had to shut down the email server and delete a few mailboxes. Every available pair of hands was walking around with an AV CDROM, scanning and cleaning all day long. The network was basically dead, flooded to destruction. Nobody got anything done for hours and hours. For days after that, people were afraid to check their email - nobody wanted to be the one who "started it" the next time.

    That cost us in time, money, and training. After that, we got serious. Amavis + Sophos on the email server, virus scan installed locally on some of the PCs, and just recently I added a procmail recipe to drop anything that windows might execute.

    Again, the company "loses" money by having to pay for all of this (my time, Sophos licensing, new beefed up email server) but that's better than standing idly by, paying people to sit there paralyzed in fear in the face of Outlook.

    The threat to business from virii is very real, but once your defenses are in place you can usually kick back and relax. That is, after you've deleted all the P2P apps, chat programs, instant messangers, and other CRAP that they really shouldn't have brought to work.

  88. The age old question by delphin42 · · Score: 1

    We know that in the current environment, viruses aren't really all that damaging. Every time a new virus comes along, experts warn everyone that it is the most potentially destructive one ever, and blah blah blah. Then the virus never seems to catch on, the effects are minor, and all is quiet until the next major 'scare'.

    The question is, are the experts overhyping the potential dangers, or are the dangers reduced as a result of their making the public aware of the virus and its potential for harm?

    --
    -- Adam
    1. Re:The age old question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think for the time being, the overhype is good. While most people I know still don't download the frequent(tm) updates for their AV programs, more and more of them are.

      There's always the chance that people will become bitter like me and stop doing it, because they've never gotten a virus.

      *sob* I lived through how many virus scares, and all I got was this e-mail asking for my advice. :(

  89. Back in *MY* day! by Telastyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Doesn't anyone remember when viruses would actually do something?

    Used to be when you got a virus it would munge your bootsector, and as much of the disk as it could after it mailed itself you all your friends.

    The viruses these days just seem to be made to propogate as far as possible, or to do something juvenile like deface web sites.

    The only reason they are only hype these days is because the payload is (relatively) innoxious. One line of code could make the few hundred thousand of computers infected last year dead, rather than popping up a cute little message.

    1. Re:Back in *MY* day! by blair1q · · Score: 2

      The sort of people who think email exploits are l33t don't know what an MBR is.

      --Blair

    2. Re:Back in *MY* day! by bughunter · · Score: 2
      Oh yes...

      Back in my day, my computer got stoned more than I did.

      Back in my day, more letters fell off my screen hairs fell from my head.

      Back in my day, a write-protect sticker and/or a condom were effective means of prophylaxis when inserting my media into unfamiliar slots.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    3. Re:Back in *MY* day! by bosef1 · · Score: 1

      I was talking about this with one of my co-workers the other day. We both agreed that the deviousness of the computer viruses seems to have declined in the past few years. Now instead of doing fun and exciting things with the low-level file system, they just mess around with the Outlook scripting engine (not that that doesn't have any "hack" value, but it just feels like doing systems type stuff requires more confidence than writing some evil batch files and launching a DoS attack).

      This reminds me, I seem to recall recently reading an article on Slashdot about people figuring out how to hide data files in the unused space at the end of the data sectors of hard drives. I remember thinking that this technique was old news, because virus writers were using this back in the 80's to hid viruses on DOS machines.

      Perhaps someone with more experience can comment, but didn't the old DOS viruses seem a lot more like rootkits than today's Outlook viruses?

  90. Hype? by slutdot · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about the rest of the world, but just viewing my IDS logs for today, Nimda and Code Red are the two biggest problems hitting my network. We get about 800 attempts a day on our firewall from machines that are still infected by those two. I tried helping out the sites infected by attempting to let their admins know their servers were infected but I soon found that roughly 1/3 of my day was spent trying to contact an admin, most of which didn't know how to fix it or didn't care. Now I don't bother unless it's something like what happened two weeks ago where I was hit every three minutes with Code Red attempts for over 48 hours from the same host thereby causing my log files to grow to 180 MB and pissing me off in the process. Contacting their ISP (which is my ISP as well) was a joke. I just got an e-mail from their support this morning asking me to send the log files in an e-mail instead of an attachment because they apparently have problems opening a .txt file. It went away after about a week. Checking the dshield.org website showed that the IP in question was apparently affecting a lot of other sites as well. Anyway, as far as I'm concerned, Nimda and Code Red are still a huge problem.

  91. yeah tell that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    to everyone that got infected with one :)

  92. smellbot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I madeyou waste a mod pint by making this post go lower.

  93. Stupidity...Maybe - Ignorance...Definitely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would have to disagree with the statement that viruses prey primarily on stupidity. I have many intelligent people working in my company who know nothing about computers. Accountants, Credit Managers, Sales Managers, Location Managers, etc. These people are intelligent and competent in their respective fields. However, many are no doubt "ignorant" regarding anything computer-related.

    Instead of revoking access to users we like to label as "stupid", maybe we as IT Managers, Sys Admins, etc. should spend more time training our people rather than browsing Slashdot all day. : )

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:Stupidity...Maybe - Ignorance...Definitely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An engineer (kernel hacker, very smart dude) at my company was the first one to get hit by "I Love You"... day it was released, he was one of the first in the office, and there it was in his inbox. IIRC, it was from his mom, so he opened it to see what she had sent him...

      Most of the sysadmins I know would be an absolute prick and claim that he should not have trusted an attachment from his own mother. At the time, we were lucky enough to have an admin who understood that even smart people sometimes make mistakes.

    2. Re:Stupidity...Maybe - Ignorance...Definitely by i244 · · Score: -1

      uhm.... wait a minute.... you think management is actually smart?

      .244

    3. Re:Stupidity...Maybe - Ignorance...Definitely by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      Well, okay, ignorance != stupidity. But the fact is that a lot of the "Accountants, Credit Managers, Sales Managers, Location Managers, etc." are aggressively ignorant about computers -- powerful tools, vital to their jobs, that they use every day -- and that amounts to stupidity. Instead of saying to their sysadmins, etc., "I don't know much about computer viruses, can you tell me how to protect myself?" they say, "I don't know and I don't want to know, but by the way, if we get hit with another virus outbreak, you're fired." This is roughly equivalent to telling your doctor, "Don't lecture me about smoking three packs a day and drinking a six-pack every night and eating at McDonald's all the time -- you're supposed to be the one keeping me healthy."

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    4. Re:Stupidity...Maybe - Ignorance...Definitely by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      "I don't know and I don't want to know, but by the way, if we get hit with another virus outbreak, you're fired."
      The only thing you can do apart from setting fire to his computer is to take a chair and site behind him for the entire day. Whenever he reaches to open an email say, "HEY! NOOOOOOO! That might have a virus!" Then check the raw mail on the server using your PDA If there are no attachments say "It's clear. I will now open it for you" He'll get the message, remember people can learn even if they don't want to.
      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    5. Re:Stupidity...Maybe - Ignorance...Definitely by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1
      "Instead of revoking access to users we like to label as "stupid", maybe we as IT Managers, Sys Admins, etc. should spend more time training our people rather than browsing Slashdot all day."
      Maybe if we trained them to browse Slashdot all day. . . Never mind.
      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    6. Re:Stupidity...Maybe - Ignorance...Definitely by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      LOL! Well, yeah, that would be one solution, I suppose ...

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  94. Just scares? by xiaix · · Score: 1

    I run redundant protection on the network I administer. All mail is processed internally, scanned (virus definitions updated hourly), executables stripped. I have gotten dozens of alerts (not false alarms) this week alone, but all were stopped at the mail server.
    If for some reason they get past this (such as one user who decided to check their webmail account), the desktop scanners (which are password protected, and centrally updated hourly) catch it.
    All this activity is more than 'just scares'... I've dealt with virus infections twice, losing a full day of work for the entire company between them, due to people feeling that the memos / warnings I send don't apply to them.
    If it wasn't for the fact that people who understand the threats are responsible for protecting users from them, the effects would be even more wide spread.
    Are they going to bring the internet down? Maybe. If the average user would realise that having an up to date firewall / installing security patches/ keeping virus definitions current were like locking your door, and that not opening unknown attachments / running unknown programs was like not unlocking the door for a stranger, it would be a lot less likely.

    --

    Have you read the Moderator Guidelines yet?

  95. I'd mod this guys post up to 5 ! by bushboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Exactly,

    DUMB COMPUTER USERS

    Fact is, 99% of the world fit that category.

    There was an article about designing UI's few days back and all I could think about was my financial partner who has to be told how to minimize a window every time.

    The kinda guy that uses a remote email connection to send 10meg word documents to the person in the office next to him, even though all he needs to do is to send locally in 1/100th of the time.

    The marketing-type person who leans over your shoulder when your computing and says to a client :-

    "You know, these machines are amazing !"

    Yeah - you should see the user jump through hoops of fire !

    And we worry about virus problems being over-hyped ?

    Screw the viruses,

    I can see the headlines now :-

    "Dumb computer users seen as the biggest risk to computer security."

    "Symantec announces the anti-dumb-computer-user fix"

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  96. Survival of the fittest? by GungaDan · · Score: 2
    Sounds like your plan would just redistribute the wealth from the antivirus folks raking it in now to the repair shops that might come to thrive in a virus-hysteria-free environment. Maybe not so bad - even a non-tech like myself could make money rebuilding virus-crunched machines for the un-fittest masses. But I still find the "ounce of prevention" idea superior.



    Besides, in my experience, those who are not the computer-savvy fittest still have lots of pr0n to share. Gotta keep 'em operational.

    --
    Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  97. Recent Viruses Nastiest for non-Windows Users by Spencerian · · Score: 2

    I hold my breath when a new Nimda-class worm starts to spread. It kills Internet performance on my cable modem (operated through Road Runner, yet another AOL Time Warner collective) as many Windows users don't have proper protection set and propagate the virus nastily. I can't be infected; I use Mac OS 9 or X. But it drags network access to the ground and kicks it around for hours.

    Fortunately, RR appears to deactivate accounts that are virus-ridden if no action is taken, which reduces the problem. Still, my Mac OS firewall dutifully records Code Red and Nimda attacks as well as the usual crackers trying to crack the very-difficult-to-crack Mac OS.

    Thanks, Microsoft, for introducing software that helps inconvenience EVERYONE on the Internet.

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  98. Obligatory Conspiracy Theory of the Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes you wonder about that super secret underground floor all the big anti-virus companies have in which viruses are written in order to perpetuate the continued existence, need, and financial well-being of said company.

    1. Re:Obligatory Conspiracy Theory of the Day by Philbert+Desenex · · Score: 2

      The "A-V" people deny this sort of theory with perhaps a bit too much vigor. See The Virus Creation Labs by George Smith.

      Also, the "A-V" people really do depend on a constant stream of new viruses, trojans, worms, chainmails, etc. They've got a distinct conflict of interest going on.

  99. Viruses seem bad to *my* wallet by Redline · · Score: 1

    I have to pay for the bandwidth used by my web site. So when thousands of unpatched and infected Windows boxes start hammering my site with virus-du-jour requests, it costs me money directly. Maybe not billions of dollars, but every penny counts when you are barely holding your dot-com finances together.
    Anyone who has felt the anguish of lost mail, lost code, damaged servers, running around trying to cauterize machine infections and keep those Outlook users from clicking anything knows how bad a virus problem can be.
    I apologize to the media that the internet hasn't imploded spectacularly enough to make a highly-rated special report on CNN, but that does not mean the problem of virus outbreaks isn't real.

  100. Code Red didn't make top 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet my server logs indicate daily that code red is still out there.

  101. Re:Oh no! More Slashdot crap. I'm going to vomit by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    I have been sitting out of security for a while so I have missed most of the anti.security.is movement. So, now that I'm caught up on things, I want to point out the hypocrisy I see in anti.security.is's approach to keeping exploits private vs full disclosure. This is not a personal attack. I have a lot of love and respect for the some of people from ADM and anti.security.is. With that said, however, I gave a significantly different view on all this.

    The stuff in []'s is taken out of the anti.security.is FAQ:

    [Q: Exactly whats wrong with open security again?]
    [A: 1. Would you give handguns to toddlers? Then why give 0day to angry teens?]

    What is the purpose of writing 0day in the first place? I see four reasons:
    1. Personal satisfication (or enjoyment of the power) with writing an exploit
    2. Impress all their friends (which also means they will distribute it to their close friends)
    3. Power (I have code that code own all the world's major governments)
    4. Blackhat activities

    The only harmless one here is #1, though I think almost no one does things for #1. #2 usually leads to #4, which is how things get leaked. If exploits get leaked, I think that is INFINITELY worse than full disclosure. The system administrators never get the exploits, only those with hacker connections. Now you have a set of hackers with working exploits and no one else knows. To my understanding, this is exactly why anti.security.is opposed full disclosure.

    With full disclosure, it may be true that hackers get the exploits, but at the least the administrators usually hear about the vulnerability and have a chance to fix it.

    [Despite trite sayings, exploiting a particular problem is harder than fixing it, as the patch or difference is usually only a matter of a line or two of code.]

    Again, why would that be of concern? To my understanding, you are saying exploits should be kept secret because if they are leaked the developer(s) will fix it quickly, and then all your time developing the exploit will be wasted. Why do you need an exploit for an unpatched vulnerability if not to use it? This leads me to my true question.. the real reason behind my posting: how can you consider this a legitimate movement if you support anti-disclosure and hack at the same time? It's hypocrisy. You don't want exploits released because you don't want script kiddies getting it and using it--maybe you don't like the way script kiddies go around defacing sites and making the security community look bad. But I don't understand how hacking a system to get source code, for example, is any better. If you're going to be against
    disclosure of exploits, you should be against all development of exploits.

    [Just like any other artistic creators, coders have the natural right to keep findings secret and personal. Often many hard hours, days, and even weeks go into the development of a viable and correctly functioning exploit. This task is not always trivial or swift.]

    Okay, but what about the "natural rights" of the people being exploited by your private exploits? If someone writes an exploit and keeps it private, I think in most cases it's because he/she plans to use it.

    [The blacklist is a list of groups and individuals in the security community who have engaged in policies that have served to harm mutual developers, network administrators, and security researchers through reckless postings or leaks.]

    I think writing exploits at all should put people on the blacklist. So the very author of this FAQ, who clearly does not oppose the development of exploits for private use, should be on this blacklist.

    [The subtle point here is that many whitehats inadvertently serve as blackhats when they
    release weapons of electronic destruction.]

    Umm, and when did ADM stop being blackhat?

  102. Klez.H by BattleCat · · Score: -1

    Well, given amount of Klez.H-infected mail our mail server has filtered through this week - I highly doubt virii are marketing hype. Without AVP installed on our mail server, our network soon would be one giant and almost incurable mess, without massive client-side antivirus installfest. Klez.H's quite sophisticated distribution scheme (it infects every RW share on MS network (yes, we're running one)) plays really against our admins. One infected machine - and soon you're finding half of the network poised. Thanks God I'm running Linux :-)

  103. CodeRed != Virus; CodeRed == Worm by bamm · · Score: 2, Informative

    I really wish people would get the terminology correct. Spafford posted a good definition over twelve years ago. A quick and dirty definition: Viruses (virii?) generally require human interaction (open an email, click on a link, etc) while worms propagate on their own, exploiting vulnerabilites within an application or operating system.

    With that said, it only makes sense that CodeRed (a worm) wouldn't make the top ten list of viruses. I doubt any true worm could ever make some top ten list when compared with large virus infections. Viruses infect workstations (PCs) while worms (generally) infect servers. Last time I checked, there were a whole lot more PCs than servers, thus a much bigger chance of infection. Furthermore, CodeRed's (a worm) impact was limited by that wonderful thing called Open Disclosure. No, M$ will never admit to this, but as a security professional who does network security monitoring, I know my clients would have been severly impacted if signatures hadn't been available for our sensors (insert shameless plug) a month prior to CodeRed (a worm!!) being released. Virus signatures, on the other hand, tend to be created after a virus has been let loose in the wild and has already impacted users.

    Bammkkkk

    --
    www.sguil.net
    The Analyst Console for NSM
  104. Code Red did cripple the internet. by Error27 · · Score: 2
    Take a look at the statistics At one point over half IIS based e-commerce websites had a confirmed backdoor. Months after Code Red hit, 10% of the the e-commerce sites still had a backdoor.

    How can anyone look at numbers like that and say it's not a problem? I find the numbers absolutely shocking...

    Basically if I buy something from a website, I want to make sure it does not run on IIS. In that sense Code Red crippled many sites for me because I am not able to use them anymore.

    1. Re:Code Red did cripple the internet. by Philbert+Desenex · · Score: 2

      Code Red and Nimda actually did a bit more than that. See this report on global router instabilities during the Code Red and Nimda peak activity periods.

      I'm not really thrilled with how that report words things, but then I don't really understand BGP and global routing. The interesting conclusion:

      We speculate that, although most of the traffic in the Internet continued to flow normally through the small fraction of links that make up the global backbones, most of the links at the Internet edge had serious performance problems during the worms' probing and propagation phases. A complete list of reasons still needs to be documented, but we suspect i) congestion-induced failures of BGP sessions due to timeouts; ii) flow-diversity induced failures of BGP sesions due to router CPU overloads; iii) proactive disconnection of certain networks; and iv) failures of other equipment at the Internet edge such as DSL routers and other devices.

      Once MSFT does dominate the Internet 100% we can expect this sort of thing to happen all the time:

      • A computing monoculture will allow 100% susceptiblity to whatever exploit-of-the-day comes around. For Code Red, only about 30% of all web servers were susceptible.
      • MSFT does protocol design very poorly, and documents it in even worse fashion. BGP is publicly documented, and it still has weird beard problems with tons of traffic. Imagine what some hacked-out, irregular piece of crap protocol like CIFS might do.
      • Security information will go back to living only in the shady underground. "Responsible disclosure", as advocated by MSFT toadies, will keep any and all security bugs from public knowledge.
      This combination of factors will result in emergent behvior that nobody will understand. Networks will go up and down like a window shade, without warning and without apparent provocation.
  105. lotta hype -- but overall security... by j-turkey · · Score: 1

    Yeah -- CNN's right -- there's alot of hype about viruses/worms, but I think that they really miss the bigger picture, which is security in general.

    Worms like CodeRed show that a well planned, coded, executed worm attack could bring the whole internet to its knees (or at least jam up big parts of the major backbones -- as well as any network with enough machines running OS/Software X). Imagine what would happen if cretin X wrote a worm to exploit a common Cisco vulnerability.

    Now, what the article really misses, is that virus companies can do little to fix these. Of course they're capitalizing on stuff like security worms...but these worms really expolit holes in the OS/Software -- and the reasons that the exist are twofold...

    1. Software and OS vendors aren't responding to security issues fast enough.
    2. (L)users and admins aren't keeping all of their machines properly updated with the fixes.

    The virus app vendors really don't do anything to address these issues. Only the vendors and (l)users can fix these...and when everyone finally gets around to doing it right, a major internet security problem gets a whole lot better.

    -Turkey

    --

    -Turkey

  106. Symobtec announces the anti-dumb-computer-user fix by bushboy · · Score: 1

    Symobtec announces the anti-dumb-computer-user fix

    April 1 2003
    Symantec today announced the release of thier new flagship product aimed at protecting people against themselves.

    Symobtec CEO, Dr. I love You, gives us a new angle on the breakthough :-

    "Lets face it, users are dumb, stupid, fuck-wits and always will be, so our product is aimed at eliminating dumb, stupid, fuck-wits from the workplace"

    When pressed for further comments, Dr. V.bs excused himself, indicating that he was coming down with a flu or something, possibly caused by his built in PC coffee-cup holder.

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  107. M$ Sympathy? by 99bottles · · Score: 1

    Call me M$ paranoid, but this sounds like the type of thing that someone in Redmond would say, "It's no big deal..."

    Having said that, let's forget about the MSTDs that prey on simple minded users, and really, you've gotta agree with the article.

  108. They're not scares in the mainstream world, folks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least not in the average small business, and in most homes. Most businesses large enough to have both dedicated system admins and some sort of software management have been able to deal with these problems without impact, but small businesses and homes are getting killed.

    Here's just a small example. I work for a smallish insurance company (about 200 users). We run Windows NT as our mainstream desktop, and NT on most of our servers. So we're theoretically ripe for virus/worm problems. However, we have an admin staff (which I run), and we pay NAI a tidy sum for their antivirus suite. We run scanning on all servers, all desktops, and we manage it with EPO (a very slick program for managing their AV, and Norton, too). On our e-mail system we run both their Groupshield for Exchange, and their SMTP scanners, with a ton 'o' filters we've set up to block all sorts of executables. We keep up-to-date on our public servers as far as patches, follow all security guidelines, restrict at the firewall, and we use MS's URLscan to block further.

    As a result, we haven't had a virus problem in years. However, over the last six months, our e-mail system has blocked 709 known viruses, and blocked even more that met our filtering criteria.

    That's 709 separate potential incidents, with all the havoc and frantic patching/eradicating that would go along with it. This is on top of all the server exploits I see in our logs daily.

    Where do these viruses come from? Many of them come from our agents - small mom & pop companies with 5 or so people, some PC's, nobody available with admin skills, and not enough knowledge to stay current. Because antivirus software came with the PC, they think that's the end of the story - nothing further needed.

    We also get a lot from other companies in our class that aren't as stringent. That usually only happens once, then they get religion and clamp down on the users. It's be nice if they ran Linux, but nothing they use for their business would work then. And they'd probably all get rooted, anyways.

    Finally, our users get infested all the time at home. Which isn't too bad a problem per se, but then they wonder why we're so strict about unauthorized software and such hardasses about it all. They just don't get it.

    At work (and this is why I'm posting anonymously), we don't care if your computer isn't "fun" to use, or infinitely customizable, or if you can't have your favorite talking icons from home. We only care that they work, work correctly, and work safely, so you can do the stuff you're being paid to do. And unfortunately, the way the world is nowadays that just doesn't normally include fun anymore. Sorry. But viruses are real, they are all too often destructive, and they will cost our companies serious money if we don't spend time, money, and sweat preventing them.

  109. Gotta love your obligatory pro-Linux statement by cscx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hmm, that's pretty funny cause when the worms hit, my IIS 4.0 box was immume and never affected. Since the web server responsibility was MINE, I made sure that IIS was secured... yeah that actually means "securing the box" (i.e., removing all script mappings, modules, etc that were not being actively used, securing the file ACLs, among other configuration changes). Yup, IIS was NEVER affected, therefore we were never hit. It still logs tons of hits per day from servers outside of the network as well.

    It's funny that I think of the same thing when I see Apache servers that are running everything up to and including mod_YourMom... people need a lesson in security... it doesn't matter if it's IIS or Apache or NT or Linux or Joe's OS.... it makes no difference. Security holes exist in every OS and configuration... it's just the job of the astute sysadmin to make sure that the holes are plugged before the box goes into production use.

    1. Re:Gotta love your obligatory pro-Linux statement by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

      You'm all ought to know, us black folk ain'ta niggers, you need to see that as the representitive of the afro-american community, and a well established fund raising afro-american cause. Actually that is well hung dick to you'm white folk. I am the man.....yes er ree brother talkin.....

      You needs to see the winds of change. cuz i am the legend whom makes martin luther king and Malcom x taddpoles in the stream of urine. Hallylooya -amen brother....

      Libert-y was not founded on the back of oppression. it was founded on the back of many southern white bitches as we screwed there lilly white ass to death. This Snake in my trouser-s is bigger if not more poundage than your average white needle dick. Amen to that white boy...

      You ought not ask what we can do for you, but ask what you can do for my black ass. You neanderthall week minded muslim loving herd nerding european fag loving folks? If you whit liberal sexist butt fucking white boys could learn to get of the trailer park and into some white ass then you can see that....... Amen brother we have prevailed.... yeah we got it all.... you gave it to us you moronic white asses of a cum twat beer drinking fag loving white peach dick ass.

      Youm need to see that I the good reverend can not be held accountable for the trash talking bible to my use wielding instrument. That that book is mine and i change it daily to suit my needs. So take your charlie daniels ass back to hickville you bunch of crud sucking no color looking no beauty ever fools. Amen I say it so well.....

      You all are probably mild mannered funn loving donkey chasing bull dick licken Steelers fans too. Oh you should never say so much as me hanging from a tree as your women can see my dick hanging in her ass. Remember me when you eat the snatch tonight and remember that i was there........

      Good day you white no dick pecker lickers.....

      This has been the revrend and I have spoken............

    2. Re:Gotta love your obligatory pro-Linux statement by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      Open Source software has vulnerabilities?!? That's not the Slashbot party line, pal. Get with the program and stop spouting your pro-Microsoft, anti-Linux FUD!

      </sarcasm>

    3. Re:Gotta love your obligatory pro-Linux statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's funny that I think of the same thing when I see Apache servers that are running everything up to and including mod_YourMom... people need a lesson in security... it doesn't matter if it's IIS or Apache or NT or Linux or Joe's OS.... it makes no difference. Security holes exist in every OS and configuration... it's just the job of the astute sysadmin to make sure that the holes are plugged before the box goes into production use."

      There's a differance between IIS and Apache...under Apache we don't have to REMOVE mod_YourMom because it is insecure all we have to do is patch it...funny how you think being an astute sysadmin requires removing features instead of patching them.

    4. Re:Gotta love your obligatory pro-Linux statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're either an idiot or a troll. First step to securing any system is disabling all the features you don't need. Go back to "system hardening 101" and then try "basic infosec for dumbasses." Doesn't matter what platform you're on...

    5. Re:Gotta love your obligatory pro-Linux statement by HiThere · · Score: 2

      True, but at least "nobody" is limited in the damage that he can do. And a lot of that stuff can be run from R/O files. Even more if you don't need to store stateful data. (But I suppose that your point is that anyone who would run a server configured that way wouldn't take other precautions either.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    6. Re:Gotta love your obligatory pro-Linux statement by akad0nric0 · · Score: 1

      First off, according to SANS (guys that know more about security than most people), the hype of CodeRed is PRECISELY why it wasn't as damaging as it could have been.

      Second, many of microsoft's shops, mine included, found themselves removing the mappings, etc... that exposed them to CodeRed, only to have MS's hostfixes unknowingly (undocumented, anyway) re-add them later on. THIS is what caused problems even at security-aware sites such as mine. And with hundreds of IIS servers, it's unreasonable to expect admin's to re-check each and every little change made since the system build to make sure every hotfix doesn't undo security settings. This is called THE VENDOR'S PROBLEM.

      --
      akad0nric0

      This sentence no verb.
    7. Re:Gotta love your obligatory pro-Linux statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>>First step to securing any system is disabling all the features you don't need.

      No the first step is dissabling all services you don't need. Features of a product is a differant story...In the MS world you have to dissable all "FEATURES" you aren't going to use and even some you want to use because they are security risks. Under Linux you patch the services you want opened and the features of those services are patched with them.

  110. Testing your claim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to see here, movealong

    1. Re:Testing your claim by GenericJoe · · Score: 1

      I Hated hearing that.

      No, really, really.

      GenericJoe

  111. Elitism and the reason why users just don't listen by uptownguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No matter how much you try and warn these people they just don't listen. They have the attention span of a gerbil and it shows. And everytime it would happen I would always get the same answer from them, "But I swear I didn't open that attatchment" To which I would reply, "The computer must have MAGICALLY sprouted hands and fingers and opened the attatchment itself, oh don't forget it also typed in your webmail username and password for you too"

    (An open message to all bitter support people, angry at "end users")

    (chuckles softly) Ever stop to consider that 99% of the "end users" (they are actually called people, or employees... you know the people we support who do the actual WORK that pays our salaries) out there don't really give a rip about your job frustrations any more than you care about the new IRS guidelines taxing the patience of Phil from accounting... Let's face it, most of what you tell them goes in one ear and out the other. NOT because they have the attention span of gerbils, but because YOU, and so many many like you, have a giant chip on your shoulder. You don't respect the people you work with, you don't appreciate the fact that you have a specialized skill that others don't share. So you talk down to your users, then you talk over their heads, then you talk about things that don't concern them or how they do their job. The signal to noise ratio is such that OF COURSE they won't really listen when you warn about viruses...

    Lighten up a little, learn to see the bigger picture, learn to see your co-workers (once you get a job again) with compassion and not this holier than thou crap and I bet you might start to notice a change.

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  112. Simple solution! by sg3000 · · Score: 2

    The obvious solution is for the Bush Administration to appoint a Computerland Security Advisor and then enact a "Computer Virus Warning System" that uses a different color code to indicate the severity of the computer virus/trojan/worm.

    I recommend the following levels:
    GREEN: Open any file or email attachment with inpunity
    YELLOW: Don't open any attachment that contains a virus
    ORANGE: Don't open any email client
    RED: Turn off your computer

    They can send an email each morning (or whenever the status changes) to all computer users so we know how to gauge the virus threat and take appropriate measures.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    1. Re:Simple solution! by parliboy · · Score: 1
      Assuming you didn't intend irony, I'll bite:

      "I'd better check the warning system status."

      *click* You Have Mail!

      "Oh, no, it's Orange! Whatever will I do? I'd better turn my AOL off!" wooouuu...

      Next Day

      "Time to check the warning e-mail. I hope it says I can turn my e-mail client back on."

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
  113. Code Red annoying, at the least... by zaren · · Score: 1

    I'm building a web server where I work, and I've been having trouble with some of the code... I keep "tail -f error.log" active, and I see lots of code red hits on this server daily, mostly from overseas machines... and it's not even a publicly known server, it's just a dev box.

    Being a Mac user at home, I haven't had to care about Code Red, but I find it's presence in the world, and it's attempts to access unknown, non-Win machines (especially ones that I'm working on) very disturbing. As I understand it, the hits I get are nothing compared to some servers, so I can only imagine the amount of bandwidth wasted on Code Red and it's kin.

    Had more people actually heeded the legitimate virus warnings of the past, this problem might not exist. Hyping the pointless crap got us to this point, and I don't see what's going to fix it in the short term.
    -----
    Is Darwin an evolutionary OS?

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  114. My argument... by gone.fishing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Computer viruses (including worms, trojans and so on) continue to be a real threat to many users (and yes, I will say especially Windows users). From my point-of-view this article did much more damage than good. It would be like writing a story saying that unprotected sex with strangers is okay because the odds of getting something aren't really all that great.

    The fact is that the reason that the threat level from viruses is down is because more people are more aware and are taking preventitive measures. This reduces the spread of viruses in the wild but it does not stop them. I would argue that the fact that the spread of serious attacks being down demonstrates that what is being done is at least partly effective.

    I'd also argue that even more still needs to be done. I'd suggest that when a company learns of an exploit involving their software, it is their responsibility to address it sooner rather than later - that by not doing so, they are part of the problem. I'd suggest that companies that allow the use of their resources by whatever means (ie:open relay, unfiltered email, access to systems and etc) also have responsibility. But most of all, I would argue that the vandals that write and knowingly distribute the software should be treated as felons and given appropriate sentences.

    Even the aforementioned actions would not eliminate the need for protection in the form of secure systems, antivirus software, and due dilligence on the part of the user. But when all of these things are combined, we can keep the situation tolerable.

  115. Who knows what the damage really is? by MarkedMan · · Score: 1

    After all, the news media focuses on the rapidly spreading viruses, and that is the only kind the anti-virus programs can stop. That stuff is the equivalent of kids spray painting a wall. The whole point of it is to spread itself and make the top 10 list, not do any serious damage. But this same technology could be used to, say, drop a trojan into a competitor, have it ferret out any files marked with "Marketing Plan" or "Project X" or "Financial Results", pop them back out to a waiting black hole, then quietly erase itself after 6-8 weeks. How would a sysadmin even know it happened? By the .00001% increase in net traffic?

  116. Nice timing~ just found one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found W32.Badtrans.B@mm on a test box today~

    A timer is used to examine the currently open window once per second and to check for a window title that contains any of the following as the first three characters:

    LOG
    PAS
    REM
    CON
    TER
    NET

    These texts form the start of the words LOGon, PASsword, REMote, CONnection, TERminal, NETwork. If any of these words are found, then the key logging is enabled for 60 seconds. Every 30 seconds, the log file and the cached passwords are sent to one of these addresses or some others which are currently not operational:
    ZVDOHYIK@yahoo.com
    udtzqccc@yahoo.c om
    DTCELACB@yahoo.com
    I1MCH2TH@yahoo.com
    WPADJQ 12@yahoo.com
    smr@eurosport.com
    bgnd2@canada.com

  117. CNN reports on computing... by crath · · Score: 1

    and everybody is surprise to see that the article is drivel. Consider the source?

  118. Media whipping people into a frenzy by SoCalChris · · Score: 1

    Of course you need some virus protection, but the media will do anything to whip people into a frenzy to increase their ratings. Just remember to be careful and use protection, and you shouldn't get any viruses.

  119. Hype in the Jungle! by DonkeyHote · · Score: -1

    You'm all ought to know, us black folk ain'ta niggers, you need to see that as the representitive of the afro-american community, and a well established fund raising afro-american cause. Actually that is well hung dick to you'm white folk. I am the man.....yes er ree brother talkin.....

    You needs to see the winds of change. cuz i am the legend whom makes martin luther king and Malcom x taddpoles in the stream of urine. Hallylooya -amen brother....

    Libert-y was not founded on the back of oppression. it was founded on the back of many southern white bitches as we screwed there lilly white ass to death. This Snake in my trouser-s is bigger if not more poundage than your average white needle dick. Amen to that white boy...

    You ought not ask what we can do for you, but ask what you can do for my black ass. You neanderthall week minded muslim loving herd nerding european fag loving folks? If you whit liberal sexist butt fucking white boys could learn to get of the trailer park and into some white ass then you can see that....... Amen brother we have prevailed.... yeah we got it all.... you gave it to us you moronic white asses of a cum twat beer drinking fag loving white peach dick ass.

    Youm need to see that I the good reverend can not be held accountable for the trash talking bible to my use wielding instrument. That that book is mine and i change it daily to suit my needs. So take your charlie daniels ass back to hickville you bunch of crud sucking no color looking no beauty ever fools. Amen I say it so well.....

    You all are probably mild mannered funn loving donkey chasing bull dick licken Steelers fans too. Oh you should never say so much as me hanging from a tree as your women can see my dick hanging in her ass. Remember me when you eat the snatch tonight and remember that i was there........

    Good day you white no dick pecker lickers.....

    This has been the revrend and I have spoken............

    yew stick, Jews for Peace

  120. Hype? I'm getting slammed here. by Anus+Bird+Girl · · Score: 1

    I've been inundated by Sircam and now Klez, two worms that propagate through e-mail adresses found in local files. On top of that, Klez is sending copies of itself with my address in the "From:" field, leading to all sorts of false accusations of infection (as if: OS X here).

    My Hotmail account has to be emptied twice daily or else the accretion of Klez debris puts it over quota. I'm starting to think that it's a Microsoft plot to get people to buy their premium Hotmail package.

    -=A=-

  121. Just wait... by strags · · Score: 2

    The viruses that have been widely propagated so far have all been fairly benign - they haven't done that much other than propagate. After all, a virus doesn't spread terribly well if it destroys its host.

    Imagine what the impact would be, however, of a virus that spreads as effectively as Code Red, but formats the hard-drive after 48 hours? (Or perhaps after it's infected a certain number of machines?)

    There were plenty of IIS machines that were infected for a good deal longer than 48 hours before their owners became aware of it. Hell - my boxes at home still receive hundreds of Code Red probes.

    The flow of IIS vulnerabilities doesn't seem to be drying up - it may well only be a matter of time before someone writes something that's really malicious. Growing complacent because the computer press has cried wolf so many times is incredibly dangerous.

    1. Re:Just wait... by tomknight · · Score: 1
      I find the idea of a virus that changes data in a Excel spreadsheet, or performes s/can/cannot in a Word document, umm... interesting.

      Tom

      --
      Oh arse
  122. Klez.e by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    Look at the description for it. Nasty. Automatically runs if you have an unpatched windows machine and you preview or view your email. I have been sent several copies of it in the last two days. I am glad I patched my internet explorer, otherwise there would be something nasty on my system.

    1. Re:Klez.e by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Aargh! My mom got that on wednesday, and it overwrote all her images and cad drawings. It also, running on one machine, saturated her entire 7.5Mb/sec office internet connection and sent out 1500 copies of itself in less then an hour. Nasty!

    2. Re:Klez.e by lanthis · · Score: 1

      we got that in our office monday. luckily only 2 people got it and it was cleaned within an hour but it still managed to disable anti-virus, infect a dozen local files and like 6 files on the shared network drive.

      What happened to the good old days though when viruses would thouroughly trash your computer and be more then a major annoyance? If I get a virus I want it to format my drive when I reboot, or randomly open programs or randomly reboot my machine, or something more useful then just spam other people. jeez.

  123. nope by SaberTaylor · · Score: 1

    Everytime I act as semiwilling tech support to my Windoze friends it is because of viruses.

    --
    If you need text styles to communicate then you don't have a message.
  124. Code red, nimda etc by afidel · · Score: 2

    The reasons that these more damagin virus's didn't take down the net or bring companies to a crawl is the same reason most virus's don't kill you. The more damaging the threat the more quickly and precisly the system's defenses react. For your body that means white blood cells and the other parts of the defense system react more vigorously, for computer viruses it means remediation efforts are put on highest priority and people work to clean them. Just because the defenses worked doesn't mean they aren't needed.

    p.s. karma's at 50 don't bother moding up

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  125. Viruses aren't a problem? by neuroticia · · Score: 1

    Tell it to my server logs. Half the hits are either from systems with a virus that tries the exploits that code red/nimda did, or from a really foolish script-kiddie who wants in and that thinks I'm running Windows and can't be bothered to find out otherwise.

    -Sara

  126. And... by heathrow · · Score: 0

    the users also feel that it is your job, as IT guru, to fix these issues for them. You rely on them to ensure your paycheck shows up on time with the appropriate amount of taxes and whatever taken out of it. That's their job. Our job is to ensure that they can't hurt themselves electronically. So we set up AV software on mail servers as well as automate AV software (incl. engine upgrades and definition updates) on file servers and their desktops. It would be a beautiful world if they could keep from clicking that pretty shiny .exe file, but they won't. That's why the role of the SysAdmin is 50% tech, 50% babysitting... -heathrow - played in corporate sandboxes

    --
    Beauty is truth, truth beauty. That is all ye need to know on Earth, besides TCP/IP.
  127. Code Red / Nimda not a problem eh? by loraksus · · Score: 2

    I'm running apache on my webserver that gets almost no legitimate hits a day. I don't advertise it etc.
    My error.log file is 50 (Fifty) megs. Since January. 2002.
    Lots of entries look like this, with some variations. I also appreciate skript kiddies trying to run root.exe on my box.

    [Wed Apr 24 10:44:21 2002] [error] [client 4.35.125.66] File does not exist: *:/****/msadc/..%5c/..%5c/..%5c/..Á/..Á/..Á/win nt/system32/cmd.exe

    I'd say that the main problem is not that the virus actually does anything harmful, but that their box is broadcasting to random ip's "hack me" and that person's hdd is shared with full perms and that if a script kiddie wanted to delete all files on the lamer's machine, they probably could, theft of corporate info (i.e. if someone works at home) is also really easy.

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  128. MS bashers are quiet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...where are the Palm bashers?

    "for Palm there has only been one actual, official virus, period. There's been none for Windows CE yet."

  129. Viruses ARE Expensive and they DO cause damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Anyone who thinks that viruses are just hype and don't cause an inordinate amount of suffering and expense for the vast majority of those whose home computers and small office machines get infected needs to socialize beyond their own demographic a bit more.

    My father in law is a retired writer. He's not technically sophisticated, he doesn't back up as often as he should, and he doesn't wrinkle his nose and think "What the hell is this?" every time he gets an attachment. The first panicked call we got was a result of all of his .doc files being corrupted and no longer loading right. A Word macro virus ate about four months of work for him. The next was about some porn dialog popping up every time he booted his computer. The next was.. I forget, there's been a dozen over the past six or seven years, but in each case I would either have to spend a lot of time on the phone or he'd wind up taking his computer in to a shop and be charged $75 to format his drive.

    A good friend of mine called me two days ago in a panic about the W32klez virus. Their small office (a non-profit with about 16 computers, Microsoft networking) was thoroughly infected, and some people's home machines - those who check their email from home - were also infected. These are gardeners, not software developers. The fact that executable attachments can be viruses is NOT the first thing in their mind when opening an email. Days of suffering for them, plus weeks of repairing damage to their credibility as a result of all the Klezmer Deep Throating Teens (or whatever the hell subjects it picked) emails sent from their machines.

    So, how do so many intelligent people form the opinion that viruses are nothing but hype? That's an easy one: My wife and I are virtually immune to viruses because our file sharing system consists of a Linux box running sendmail and proftp. Our email clients on our satellite win98 boxes are older copies of Eudora, and we're highly suspicious about any attachments. So, it's easy for us to get into the mindset that viruses are a load of hooey and couldn't really do that much damage. They can't... to us. From reading people's posts here, that view seems to work for most Slashdot readers, but it ain't How Things Are for many many others.

    1. Re:Viruses ARE Expensive and they DO cause damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Replying as an AC (replying in kind): It sounds that viruses are expensive/time-consuming to those who probably should not have computers -- in this day and age, it would be difficult to work at expected levels of productivity without them, but as you are the family tech support, as I am, you know the value of your time when you are futzing about a family member's PC because they were ignorant about what they were doing with the machine. The trick is this

      So, how do so many intelligent people form the opinion that viruses are nothing but hype?

      It isn't an opinion, but fact. It is a tragedy that your father lost all of his work/time/effort due to the fact he unleashed the virus in his system; granted, it was sent to him by sources unknown, but should he not be held accountable for his own actions (inactions)?

      And as far as the gardeners go, they should be aware and educated as much as your father should be: do not trust anything received online, especially through your email client. W32Klez, CodeRed, Nimda, were all viruses that could/should have been non-events as far as the media was concerned. Anyone actually infected with these should simply pack up their computer in the box it came in and ship it back to the manufacturer - or continue to rely on their friendly family tech support for help....

      .....yeah, pretty much flamebait, but couldn't take it anymore......

    2. Re:Viruses ARE Expensive and they DO cause damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It isn't an opinion, but fact. It is a tragedy that your father lost all of his work/time/effort due to the fact he unleashed the virus in his system; granted, it was sent to him by sources unknown, but should he not be held accountable for his own actions (inactions)?

      So if someone props a nail up under your rear wheel and you get flat tire when you start your car and back out of your driveway, is it your fault? If not, why not? Should you not be held accountable for your own action (inaction)? Why, in your world, does no responsibility lie with the one who put the nail there, or the one who wrote the virus?

      By your logic, it's a tragedy that you lost your legs when your car blew up, but you did unleash the explosion on yourself when you started your car without first checking everywhere for any deliberate malfeasance.

      Clearly, spiked tires and car bombs are only a problem to those who shouldn't own cars. You should wear maroon less often.

  130. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by t0qer · · Score: 1, Troll

    Lighten up a little, learn to see the bigger picture, learn to see your co-workers (once you get a job again) with compassion and not this holier than thou crap and I bet you might start to notice a change.


    You have no fucking clue...

    Most admin's start out with the best of intentions, focus on being nice, focus on teaching your users so they don't rely on you so much. Then when things are gravy you can focus on fun stuff like bringing up new servers or network services.

    Reality is just as I stated in my original comment. After 7 years of dealing with really stupid people, I don't have the urge to give them a coke and a smile. I ain't a fucking burger flipper you got that? The last people in the company that should be that stupid are the one's in charge.

    By your logic, you're focusing the burden of responsibility to the admin and not the end user. So I guess it's MY fault they opened the attatchment. I guess it's MY fault that I have to order a new laptop everytime this paticular sales lady goes out on travel and returns with a mangled laptop because "It's too much trouble to carry it on" This paticular lady i'm thinking of DESTROYED 9 laptops in 3 months! You would think MAYBE after the first one she would wise up BUT SHE KILLED 8 MORE!

    Lighten up my ass, i'm sick of being a sysadmin. Honestly, I don't think i'm ever going back to anything IT realated anymore because it is not me that is the one with the holier than thou attitude, it's them.

  131. The reason why users just don't listen by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
    99% of the "end users" ...don't really give a rip about your job frustrations

    You hit the nail on the head! They have enough problems with their own job frustrations.

    Every time I hear that AOL commercial and that guy says "no more of that computer mumbo-jumbo" is causes me to shudder - I think "It's not mumbo-jumob, it's easy!" and then I realize to them it is mumbo-jumbo.

    So treat is as such. Don't explain to them what viruses do or how they spread, if hotmail is causing problems, I block hotmail. But then again, I can do that. My boss is so comp-illiterate I don't even give him a PC, PDA, terminal - nothing! But when someone complains that they need hotmail, I ask "what business purpose does it serve?" I explain how much a virus outbreak costs the company, and the boss backs me up. End of problem.

    --
    "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  132. awful by Kallahar · · Score: 2

    I can't believe how clueless people are that think viruses aren't dangerous. True the recent big ones have been annoyware, but it would have been childs play for their author to put in a malicious payload that could have erased everything on everyone's drives. It only takes one bad virus to cause trillions of dollars in damage, real damage. We should be taking these non-destructive ones as warning shots, not passing them off as just pranks.

    Travis

    1. Re:awful by 99bottles · · Score: 1

      That's a wonderful thought. If only these had erased hard drives, we wouldn't still be seeing Code Red!

      Time for Code Red IV "The Cleaner"

  133. Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I'm glad an asshole like you is out of his sysadmin job.

    Nothing worse than a arrogant know-it-all prick for an admin...I'd rather have someone with no ability but a good attitude.

  134. Angina is not pain, it's the fear of pain by gelfling · · Score: 2

    That's like viruses. We spend millions and billions to prevent all of the viruses except the ones that fuck us up. God laughs at us.

  135. From the Future by Arandir · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In 2003, the news media reported on the Faux Flu. It was dangerous they said. It would kill old people and children. It would cause everyone else to spends weeks in the hospital. It had all sorts of nasty symptoms, which I won't describe here.

    The reporting was hyped all out of proportion. Every hour on the hour there was a public service announcement regarding it. Major troop movements in the Middle East were relegated to the back page in favor of reporting on some kid with a runny nose on page one.

    The public went into a panic. People went and got their flu shots. The covered their mouths and noses when the coughed or sneezed. They didn't go into work when they had the sniffles. They stopped french kissing with strangers.

    But there was no outbreak. A total of five people died of the Faux Flu. The people blamed the media for inciting panic. Newspaper subscriptions plummeted and Disney Megacorp had to sell off AOL/TW to stay afloat.

    Then the Fu Flu hit the next year. No one believed the media. No one took their flu shots. Sneezing in crowded train stations was considered hip and cool, a way of telling the doommongers to bugger off.

    And 1.3 billion people died.

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  136. W32.Klez by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 2

    Well the article has been /.'d or something, so I can't read it, but is anyone else getting tons of Klez worms on the mail, either directly or as bounces? That's the one that exploits IE's problem with the word 'begin', *AND* forges return addresses from e-mail addresses found on infected computers.

    It's very disturbing to get bounces from hotmail because you supposedly sent someone a virus. (No, I don't have it; all my e-mail reading and sending is done from a Linux box and its a Windows/Outlook worm.)

    --
    ---dragoness
  137. Thank god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whew! That's a relief that I'll never have to work with you.

    Get a clue...it's not your *fault* that any of that happened, but it is your *job* to fix it. That's why they pay you, remember? The job description didn't say "surf slashdot all day, and be rude to anyone who dares disturb you".

  138. Dumb Computer Users by bluemiracle · · Score: 0

    I would have to disagree with most people here in their view of the majority of PC users as dumb. Thats not the case.

    Most people are un-aware whats involved when it comes to virii and av software. For the average home user, they'd like to be able to turn on their machine, check email, browse, etc.

    When something like a virus comes along, in their email, or what not, they havent had much exposure to that before. Most people will inadvertently open an attachment, or even click on it, which in some cases will start the virus automatically.

    Once they get infected, and their normal operations get upset, someone has to fix it. After all the times I have fixed machines for people, almost everyone then understands the implications of getting a virus. They are more knowledgable about the problems that they can cause, and will work hard to keep updated with their av definitions, etc.

    It's not that most users are idiots, just the majority of them havent experienced these problems before, and dont have the level of understanding that most of us do.

    Once something happens, its less likely to happen again.

    --Trying to Defend the Average User

  139. Don't worry, the industry's improving by dachshund · · Score: 2, Funny
    One line of code could make the few hundred thousand of computers infected last year dead, rather than popping up a cute little message.

    One line of code? With Microsoft Visual Basic .NET you can do it with only half a line! With SOAP compatability.

    1. Re:Don't worry, the industry's improving by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Heh

      while(1){
      ~My_Computer();
      }

  140. Re:The nature of the media by yintercept · · Score: 1

    The media is not step in step with reality...no big news here. The media has never been step in step with reality. The media is going to write about things that fit well within their perception of the world, and will write what sells copies.

    The Media reported heavily on the "Big Red" virus because the name had hip appeal...invoking an image of a late night hacker working on excessive doses of Mountain Dew.

    Of course, people responding to the hyped viruses probably helped stop less popular but more sinester code. I have no expectation of the media being something different than it is. A hype story every once inwhile can help raise awareness.

    A more interesting take on the picture is how certain names lodge themselves onto the media's tongues and get nationwide coverage, while others languish in the backroom. In this regard, you could say the Big Red virus infected the media itself, getting a great deal of mainstream media coverage.

  141. 250 IIS Unicode Attacks so far == TODAY == by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1
    According to my Vericept Network Security monitoring device, I've been hit with 250 IIS Unicode attacks TODAY and its just noon here in Denver. Since I run Apache on Linux, this isn't that much of a concern to me but its scary that the media wants to convince people that they don't really have to worry. Of course, it isn't much of a story when some virus gets out in the wild but doesn't do any damage because people have current anti-virus software. Look back on how much mileage the media got out of the damage caused by "Mellisa", "I love you", and "Code Red". I guess the media would also like it if we went back to the lax airline security we had before 9/11 so they could have some real-world disasters to write about too.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  142. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just as easy to not open an e-mail attachment as it is to not stick your dick in the shredder. I shudder to think of what would happen if people had a shredder support staff telling them not to stick their dick in there all the time.

    Just yesterday I was on the phone with someone who I knew had recieved a virus from the mail logs, and told her "Do NOT open that message with subject..." and she said "What, this one?" and clicked on it, infecting her and her entire office. People are stupid about computers because someone told them it should be hard, and intellegent people will do the stupidist things under those circumstances.

  143. If you're a sysadmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're the digital information equivalent of a burger flipper, boy.

  144. The virus ecosystem by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The anti-virus industry depends on the continued introduction of new viruses. This creates a strange synergy between anti-virus companies and virus creators.

    It's important to the revenue stream of the anti-virus companies that their products not work very well. Note how these things work. They mostly recognize known viruses. They don't generally stop improper behavior by all possibly-hostile content. Hence, constant upgrades are necessary. The initial version is usually free, just like a drug dealer.

    It doesn't have to be this way. Suppose, for example, that Mozilla rendered all pages and executed all downloaded content in a "jail" secured by the OS, one that could write to the window, receive input when it has the focus, and talk back to the sending server, but nothing else. This could work under FreeBSD as currently shipping; Linux may get there.

    1. Re:The virus ecosystem by QuodEratDemonstratum · · Score: 2, Informative

      The anti-virus industry depends on the continued introduction of new viruses

      Not totally true. Look at April's wild list. Form.A is on the list and has existed for over 10 years.

      They don't generally stop improper behavior by all possibly-hostile content

      Because behavior blocking doesn't work. It is difficult to distinguish between malicious behavior and things that users want and need to do. Too many false alarms => software disabled.

    2. Re:The virus ecosystem by mmacdona86 · · Score: 2

      To really change the virus ecosystem it has to run on Windows--and it has to apply to code received from e-mails. How long until Microsoft gets around to this? (Of course then the anti-virus vendors will accuse Microsoft of further anti-trust violations :))

  145. Education is good by crivens · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Education is good, but how about educating companies like Microsoft so that we're less vulnerable to such viruses? Why should the users suffer so much when the majority of the blame (IMO) is on companies like Microsoft?

  146. Where is it when you need it? by blair1q · · Score: 2

    The "OBVIOUS" tag, I mean.

    --Blair

  147. cell phones already have viruses by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

    They're disguised as the marketese word, "messaging"... that, and telemarketers.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  148. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > they are actually called people, or employees... you know the people we support who do the actual WORK that pays our salaries

    Easy to say when you have a good job. I consider them PEOPLE when they HELP ME HELP THEM to solve their problem. When they are lazy ("oh, just send someone up. I don't have time to sit on the phone all day."), unecessarily vague ("Is the Internet down?"), or rude, they are not people. They are lower life forms and deserve to be treated as such.

    Oh, you don't give two shits about making my job easier? Good. Don't be surprised when I don't run out my office door to give you a hand when you opened ANOTHER OBVIOUS ATTACHMENT AGAIN that fucked your computer and the rest of the company.

    AND FOR GOD'S SAKE, DON'T SAVE YOUR ONLY COPY ON A FLOPPY DISK. HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES DO I HAVE TO TELL YOU? We have a sophisticated network and e-mail system for a reason, dumb ass. Oh, it went in one ear and out the other you say? Sucks for you asshole, because you just lost a lot of work by not listening.

    Perhaps I would be so bitter if I didn't spend 4+ fucking years to get a degree only to end up answering the same remedial questions for careless, rude people. My job is about as challenging and fulfilling as monitoring dirt movement. Sadly, there are no other jobs for me and I'm about to get laid off even though I was there longer than my fucking boss who doesn't have a degree. WTF?!

    > learn to see the bigger picture

    I already do. I regularly promote dangerous behaviors like drunk driving. For every fatal car accident it's one less person I have to compete against in the job market. Booooyah!

  149. Scares? Nope, warnings.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    Scares? I don't think so. None of these worms has been actually written well, taking into consideration survivability, self presurvation(sic?), or to take advantage of the human nature of things. They where, at best, bad examples.

    In a way, I'm glad they where, indeed, POOR examples. They could have done much more damage, by actually taking over the affected systems. Build themselves a happy little distributed distributed network. Talk to eachother. Be silent for a while, allowing itself to propograte, comminucate, and eventually, launch a very deadly payload, all at once.

    Last years worms where at best case, ticks or leeches. Easily removed, annoying as hell, but in most cases, for the most case, harmless..

    Just wait. Fighting disease could be considered a 'scare'. But I have yet to see an AIDS of the computer world..

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  150. Re:Nimda (URL Oops) by lgallion · · Score: 1

    The correct URL for the HoneyNet Project is:
    http://project.honeynet.org/

  151. Virus protection more dangerous than viruses by sjonke · · Score: 1

    Windows may be a different story, but I have been using Macs since the days of the SE-30 and have never once encountered a virus of any sort and I've been far from careful. The vast majority of that time I have not had so-called virus protection software installed because... I certainly have run into problems with virus protection software.

    --
    --- What?
  152. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woah, chill out dude!
    They don't call "support and repairs" an idiot tax for nothing you know.
    Car mechanics have known this forever. Time for computer staff to clue in and realise people will not do what they're told but that's OK because they will pay you BIG $$$ over and over for you to fix it. If they don't pay you the BIG $$$ then you don't fix it and when they _really_ need that report in on time, then they pay you the BIG $$$.

  153. Hoax or danger? by Wylie+Coyote · · Score: 1

    I wrote a paper last year on Code Red and the whole hacking culture, which won its category in my employer's "papers program". Unfortunately the paper isnt available publicly yet, though Im hoping to have it published soon.

    Anyway, the conclusion was basically this:

    There have been several worms in recent times, CodeRed, CodeRed v2, CodeRed II, and Nimda to name the more obvious ones. All of these exploited bugs in IIS that Microsoft knew about in June 1999 but other than a few knowledge base articles with attached patches, they did nothing about it. The same bug was even reported in beta versions of XP, so they didnt even fix their own development code.

    We were lucky in that these worms were mostly an annoyance which did little more than deface a web site, and/or replicate themselves. They could have done a lot more damage, as many /.ers have pointed out.

    What they achieved though is an almost global awareness of the dangers, and potential damage that worms like these can do if they wanted to, while reminding system admins that software should be patched/upgraded regularly - particularly when the bug being exploited had been known about and reported by cert 2 years prior to the worms being created! In this regard, they did us a great service. The media hype and predictions of doom got peoples attention in a way that had not been achieved before.

    Microsoft, with its marketing machine, got loads of publicity. I remember seeing Bill Gates on the news, standing at a podium with the FBI at his side saying how Microsoft had reacted quickly and provided patches to defeat the evil hackers (remember that these patches had been available for 2 years - what Microsoft was providing was simply a cumulative bundle of these). The publicity was priceless, touting Microsoft as our saviour, yet I believe it was Microsofts lack of action in fixing the problem and making people aware of it that allowed the worms to be created in the first place.

    Its not good enough to simply know about a problem and passively make a patch available for download. Its difficult to keep track of all customers, but I would have thought that if you have a large number of very large corporate customers, you should pro-actively send them updates and advisories, and make it widely known that there is a problem which needs attention. Whatever Microsoft did or didnt do, it wasnt enough (obviously).

    I said it so much better in the paper, but basically I believe that the guys that wrote these worms did us a service, and although CNN might think it was a big fuss over nothing, I would disagree. It was certainly the bigest event of its kind in the internets history so far.

    --
    "If I could only live my life with my threshold at 4... " -- Wil Wheaton
  154. Most places I've worked... by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess it's MY fault that I have to order a new laptop everytime this paticular sales lady goes out on travel and returns with a mangled laptop because "It's too much trouble to carry it on" This paticular lady i'm thinking of DESTROYED 9 laptops in 3 months! You would think MAYBE after the first one she would wise up BUT SHE KILLED 8 MORE!

    Most places I've worked, the subsequent 8 laptops would have come out of HER paycheck--a great incentive to be more careful with company property. (The insane paperwork to get *anything* ordered at my current workplace is a good incentive not to wreck your current box, too).
    Frankly, as long as it's not coming out of YOUR paycheck, why does her idiocy with laptops spin you up so much? They were still paying you for the work involved, right?

    You're laid off, and bitter--I can understand that. Been there, done that a few times. Job searching all over and getting nothing for months on end is incredibly demoralizing. However, you might want to learn to relax and enjoy things a bit more, because that bitterness will show in job interviews. Also, if the job situation is that bad locally, why not search elsewhere? The internet is damn useful for that.

    --
    ---dragoness
  155. ounce of prevention? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the complaint is that publicity sells more anti-virus software, and the latest viruses aren't doing much damage? This is a bad thing?

  156. CodeRed brought down Verizon's SE backbone by coats · · Score: 2
    Verizon has not publicly admitted the fact, but last fall, the portion of net backbone owned by Verizon was brought to its knees for two days by CodeRed DOS'ing their internal network. I personally know the people responsible for monitoring the backbone, and they tell me that the virus's activity signature is unmistakeable.

    The claim "the virus scare is all hooey" is itself all hooey.

    --
    "My opinions are my own, and I've got *lots* of them!"
  157. bored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like one of your 6th grade classes is a little slow today. At least you'll get to go home soon and play Nintendo.

  158. Best Anti-Viral Software? The Outlook Uninstaller by johnos · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I admit to being a download slut. I have downloaded most days for the last ten years. And I am not too particular about where I download from either. But I never get viruses. Well, I got one on the mac once in 1991. And another on a word document about 1997. But that's it.
    When people ask me about viruses, I always tell them to use something besides Outlook and they will be fine. And they are.
    For 98% of the people out there, the damn anti-virus software is more of a hassle than the viruses they can't catch. The bloat in security software puts MS to shame. All you need is Norton anti virus to show the kids what a 386 was like. Slooooowwwww.
    The only way you can get a virus nowadays, is to start up Outlook. I do not understand why the corporate IT guys, for whom these high-profile worms are a genuine headache, do not sue MS. By pretty well insisting on having scripting 24/7 in all their apps, they have created a royal road into anyone's box. The patches they offer are laughable. The house is on fire, and when a bit of flame shows in the front window, MS generously rushes up with a glass of water.

  159. Code Red virtually destroyed one major auto co... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    At least one major automotive company was utterly crippled by Code Red for nearly a week. The systems administration at these plants are a joke, and they're all interconnected on the network.. So everything running IIS (which is just about everything as their standard custom OS install INCLUDES it) was infected.

    The servers I have control over in there (which need real web interfaces and therefore ran Apache) were, naturally, immune, but the access logs sometimes showed upwards of 80 hits a second trying to infect them, all from internal addresses. I estimate that over 75% of their systems were infected. Many still are.

    Oh, here's the fun part: it cripped them because the attack took out the wireless access points. The access points ran an internal web server for configuration, and it simply locked up the access point with one overlarge packet. Crunch. Eventually they disabled the access points web interfaces.

    At one point, as an interim measure, they setup the main routers to block all port 80 traffic. Period. Nothing that had port 80 in it was passed anywhere. This was simply to stop all their servers from crashing at all the plants due to the massive DoS attack caused by the infected boxes trying to infect others.

    So excuse me for laughing my arse off when I saw this article... ;)

  160. never enough security by dirvish · · Score: 1

    I don't think there can ever be too big of an emphasis on network security and virus protection. The internet is more fragile than most people realize and networks go down all the time from virus attacks.

  161. Re:The nature of the media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CODE red.... Big Red is gum

  162. Charging by the Hour by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 2

    Well, 4 years ago (adjust for inflation), in Louisiana (adjust for lower cost of living/lower pay rates), I worked for a computer consultant who charged $75/hour to people he liked, (i.e. his discount rate) for setting up/fixing Windows computers. He was also a greedy little cheat, too. (Adjust for dishonesty). That's one data point for you. Dunno how it compares.

    --
    ---dragoness
  163. nothing here... by gTsiros · · Score: 1

    I've been (ab)using my computer(s) for over a decade (i'm 21)...running pretty much any .exe there is out there, be it downloaded from a website or whatever (except those really standing-out sex.exe and the like). I only got infected once, with a virus that freezes your pc (actually makes it incredibly slow) when you run an infected program. I think it was a side-scroller platform game, ala crystal caves...

    Never got the ILOVEYOU virus, never got anything. I think it is location-specific EVEN THO the internet is physical-location-independent...

    oh well. Nowadays that i've been using unix (linux) i've pretty much forgotten about crashes/viruses...Also i might try out that debian trick where you NEVER need to reboot ;)

    (been a slow day today...not anyone around to talk to...so...heh...thanks for listening...)

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
  164. Don't Forget Momentary Lapses of Care by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't even go as far as to say "ignorant". Getting hit with a virus can happen to anyone under the right circumstances. I goofed the other day and opened a message in Outlook Express (I turned off the preview pane) and almost got hit with a virus. Norton AntiVirus caught it so it didn't do any damage. I'm usually careful about messages from people I don't know and I certainly never click on attachments. It was just that I had a bunch of emails to go through and was careless in opening each one without thinking. I don't think that qualifies me as stupid -- we all have our momentary goofs. Spend enough time on a computer and everyone makes a mistake sooner or later.

    I suppose you could argue that because I've set up LiveUpdate! to run on my desktop every damn day that I'm protecting myself but this could have easily happened to a laptop that doesn't run LiveUpdate every day. Or maybe I get hit with a virus the day it hits the web (before my LiveUpdate! runs and I get the virus definition).

    GMD

  165. Sorry, I don't buy it by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    The big problem with your point-of-view is that by ignoring the SA's warnings they not only make his life miserable but THEIR OWN ALSO. So Phil from accounting not only has new IRS guidelines but is now frantically trying to use his email because he couldn't be bothered to read and remember the warning message he got that morning. Being busy is no excuse, the highways are jammed but that isn't an excuse to slam into other cars constantly. You belong to the pass the buck crowd, "It is ok for me to not think and screw up because someone will clean up after me."

    A crisis on your part is not necessarily one on mine.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Sorry, I don't buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that's not how people think. If the computer is broken, it just means a 3 hour lunch break. If they're boss is pissed, it's IT's fault for not blocking viruses. If IT blocks the viruses, it's IT's fault that the VP can't get his crappy animated greeting cards.

      It's human nature: If there is no reprocussions for doing something that's prohibited, some people will do it anyway.

  166. If news was not sensationalized by doorbot.com · · Score: 2

    Woman: "In other news, a lot of stuff happened that doesn't really affect you. In fact, most of it was thousands of miles away. We would tell you about it, but you'd just worry, lose some hair, and die a few days sooner."
    Man: "We'll be right back after these messages from our honest sponsors..."

    <accurate portrayals of real products>

    Man: "...welcome back! And all this time I thought that sports car I drove made me more attractive to women."
    Woman: "And I thought men who drove sports cars were better in bed!" (glances at co-anchor)
    Man: "Upcoming later this hour, we sensationalize Timmy Smith's scraped knee, after a fall while he was attempting to ride a tricycle!"
    Woman: "And we'll inflate claims by virus companies that hackers are out to make your life a living hell."
    Man: "But first, let's go to Acton, Massachusetts for live coverage..."
    Reporter: "Yes, the trolls are out in force today! It's sensationalism at it's best! Not bothering to read the stories they post on, internet users around the world are honing their reactionary skills to a fine point, putting all logic and reason behind them..."

  167. hype by First_In_Hell · · Score: 0

    I think it is all hype anyway. In a big office with a lot of machines running Windows, running Norton Antivirus corporate edition has been the savior many times over. This thing is controlled by a central server, and even if the braindead user opens a file inviting him to chat with naked camel penises, it will automatically catch the virus and not allow it to do further damage. Hundreds of viruses have been caught this way and we don't even bother worrying about the virus problem anymore, the server takes care of everything.

  168. Huh?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was that supposed to be funny?

    It doesn't even make sense.

  169. I'm gonna have to disagree with you on that one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will say that many of the viruses that have been written have been nothing more than a flash in the pan. But Nimda was a different story. My college campus was a worst case scenario of this "bug" and we were offline for upwards of a week and a half. Of course, our network admins let it run unprotected for... 3 days without doing anything, so I guess they got what they deserved.

  170. U B Full of Crap by lseltzer · · Score: 1

    >>My CIO would be reading her hotmail or yahoo mail, whatever. Point is it was a mail service outside of my control. She would see the subject, "I love you" and thinking it was a date, she would open it, from which it would spread like mad cow diesease. The rest of my day would be spent cleaning out her crap.

    Everything on Yahoo! Mail and Hotmail has been virus-scanned at the server (by Symantec and McAfee respectively) for at least 2 years. They're very aggressive about updates. Nobody gets infected via these systems. It's the idiots who are still running Outlook 97 who are causing all the problems

  171. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by Arandir · · Score: 1

    The entire IT industry has a serious attitude problem. Go dig ditches for a while, or pick cotton, or even flip burgers. You guys have one of the highest wage rates on the planet, yet you act like you've been assigned to shovel shit at the zoo.

    Every job since the beginning of time had its downsides, and every one but the job of hermitting had to deal with lusers. But only the IT industry takes it personally. I think I could survive a week as a professional sysadmin. Could you survive a week as a professional software engineer?

    p.s. Sysadmins are lusers as well. Two months ago I received two emails from IT. The first said "your Solaris machine will be upgraded remotely this Saturday. Please log out at the end of Friday, but do not power off the machine." The second said "the network will be down for maintenance this weekend. Please log off all machines by the end of Friday."

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  172. reminds me of the Michelangelo hype in early 90's by bbh · · Score: 2

    This reminds me a lot of the hype that struck around the time of the Michelangelo virus in March of 1992. Virus experts were throwing out statements about a computer appocalypse that was going to wipe out the computers of millions of computer users. By going on television and being quoted in newspaper articles, companies like McAfee and Symantec basically created an industry for themselves by using fear to sell there product. Michelangelo went off with a whimper in the end, but the antivirus industry has been going strong ever since.

    bbh

  173. "incompetent" is the word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone regularly gets into their car and does things like drive the wrong way down a one way street, he's an idiot. No matter what else he does right, he's an idiot, and will get no respect.

    If someone sits down at his desk and regularly does things equivalently stupid, he can be "intelligent and competent in his respective field."

    These people aren't just ignorant, they're willfully and proudly ignorant. "Don't bother me with the tedious details, computer monkey, I have real work to do."

    It's a cultural problem. It's okay to be completely, harmfully incompetent about computers, so people stay that way. In fact, people are rewarded for it with sympathy.

    The proper solution? Well, general ridicule would work, but not from a bunch of smart-alec computer monkeys. Have you ever seen "Nick Burns: Your Company's Computer Guy" on SNL? That is how they see us. It's not that they are insufferably lazy when it comes to learning about computers, regardless of cost or consequence, we are irrationally demanding.

    Basically, there's nothing geeks, with low social status, can do to change a harmful cultural value. Just imagine your paycheck stapled to the next idiot's forehead, try not to stress out over the problems they cause, and look for a less idiotic job. Corporate Darwinism will cure it eventually.

  174. Re:Scares? Nope, warnings.. by parliboy · · Score: 1

    Just wait. Fighting disease could be considered a 'scare'. But I have yet to see an AIDS of the computer world. You've never site licensed through Microsoft?

    --
    "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
  175. Sircam where have you gone? by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    Hi! How are you?

    I send you this post in order to have your nostalgia

    See you later. Thanks

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  176. You got away with a day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nimda + code Red took one of my former employers down for two weeks, thanks to poor decisions about security, user education, and source control.


    The lost revenue led directly to the layoff of 10% of their work force at my location.


    Now I know some new questions to ask prospective employers.

  177. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by uptownguy · · Score: 1

    Lighten up my ass, i'm sick of being a sysadmin. Honestly, I don't think i'm ever going back to anything IT realated anymore because it is not me that is the one with the holier than thou attitude, it's them.

    You ever see the SNL sketches about "Your Company's Computer Support Guy"? If you haven't maybe you should. While watching it, see if you recognize anyone in the sketch...

    I ain't a fucking burger flipper you got that? The last people in the company that should be that stupid are the one's in charge.

    I am shocked, just SHOCKED, that you are currently out of work.

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  178. Something to think about by mikerackhabit · · Score: 1

    There's an interesting paper on "Warhol Worms" here.

    Basically the author predicts that, by using efficient algorithms to search the space of potential victims a worm could infect most of the vulnerable computers in 15 minutes to an hour. Pretty scary when you think of how much damage Code Red variants were doing 3 weeks after the initial hit.

  179. You left the front door open.... by bushboy · · Score: 1

    Close it quick, before the morons get here...

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  180. Feeding off its own fat? by BoBaBrain · · Score: 1

    "CNN is carrying a story on how the big virus scares within the last year or so have been just that: scares, usually hyped by the media..."

    So CNN are now running a Dramatic Exposé (TM) on how they ran Dramatic Exposés (TM) on non-news stories...

    --
    I am a Karma Library.
  181. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Janitor: Please don't throw cigs and gumwrappers on the ground, I just have to clean them up!

    Employee: Fuck you -- don't look at me funny or I'll get you fired.

    Computer Janitor: Please don't open viruses. I just have to clean them up!

    Employee: Fuck you ....

    The key to sysadmin work is to get promoted way out of the way of any ordinary users and spend your time lurking around a datacenter. Even then it sucks though because its the same boring shit day in and day out.

  182. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, you have a point, but I'm not receiving much money from these users. I'm getting layed off in a month and I have been searching for the last 6 months for an alternate job.

    Where do you get the big money from?

  183. Re:Scares? Nope, warnings.. by Thomas+Charron · · Score: 2

    That'd be more of a mental disorder then a virus.. 8-P

    --
    -- I'm the root of all that's evil, but you can call me cookie..
  184. Priceless! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't help it, I just love people like this! They're so full of themselves that they don't realize what kind of impression their actions make on other people :-)

  185. Good money after bad by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    We shouldn't underestimate the destructive power of viruses. Nimda took at least one Department's network down for several days in the State of Washington. I have been harping for years that my Department's network security is almost non-existent but to little avail.

    Network security, if done right, is a fulltime job. Small businesses and small Government Departments just don't have the staff to keep up with it. So we're caught in a situation where we have to assess the risk of infection and the probable consequences of an infection. If the risks are great enough and the consequences bad enough we apply a patch. If not we don't and pray that we don't get hit. We just don't have the resources to apply every patch.

    We do run McAfee virus scan on every computer and NetShield on all of our servers but I remember a while back when McAfee put out a new virus definition file that was bad (It didn't work with older virus scanning engines) and it brought our network down. That required a visit to about two hundred PCs to correct the problem. The anti-virus companies are working like hell to keep up. But what can they do? If they push the virus definition files out the door too fast then quality control is lowered but if they take the time for quality control then their customer's get hit with the new virus.

    I just hope that when the shit really hits the fan that it is pointed to one of the most guilty parties: Microsoft. Yes Microsoft for putting out products that are making all of their customers vulnerable.

    My solution is to dump the entire Microsoft line and go with Linux. But that isn't well received because of the huge investment in the Microsoft products. We just keep throwing good money after bad.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  186. Only Scare: because virus writers are amateurs by SLOGEN · · Score: 1

    If virus'es are only scary, it's because the virus writes are amateurs.

    Vira could be a lot more smart:

    1. multiple targets/entry points

    - exploit varying holes in a heterogene environment

    2. morphing

    - Using nondeterministic compilation you could create vira that would be virtually impossible for scanners to identify -- shape-shifting for every infected computer/file.

    3. incubation time

    - Vira which we have seen recently don't have much of an incubation time

    4. Social engineering

    - Look at the "SULFNBK.EXE" (non)vira. Vira that infects this file will probably be a lot more likely to survive for at least a few years.

    5. Centralization/automation

    - As we adopt digital signatures and auto-updates of programs and operating systems, we are creating the perferct transfer media for vira.

    6. All the stuff i didn't think of in 10 mins.

    Fortunatly, it seem it's mostly intellectually inept people who make vira (YES, I mean that - if some "real" people did it it would be MUCH! more dangerous).

    --
    SLOGEN [ http://ungdomshus.nu : Sebastian cover music]
  187. the media can scream "fire" all they like by not_anne · · Score: 2, Funny

    It takes an actual (not threatened) disaster for people to actually care about disaster preparation.

    Among the many other hats I wear, I'm the antivirus/worm/trojan/etc. person at my work.

    About a month before Nimda hit last year, I'd written strict guidelines to how our company should safeguard itself against viruses. The president, who needed to approve the document before I sent it out, stated that the rules were too strict (don't open attachments you're not expecting/from people you don't know, etc.) and that since he wouldn't follow them, nobody else should either. He ordered me to edit the document so that it was more "friendly" and so I reluctantly rewrote it, and then emailed it out.

    Lo and behold, Nimda hits the following month, and it's all over the media by the time I get to work. We were immediately infected with this thing before I even got to work (along with two major clients), all due to the lax guidelines I released the month before. Ironically, our president himself was the one to clicked on the Nimda .exe and subsequently infected all of our computers. It took me all day to fix the carnage left by Nimda.

    After I was done cleaning up Nimda's mess, I dusted off the strict version of my virus guidelines, and demanded that it be implemented immediately. It was made policy, and since Nimda, we have thwarted every other virus attack that has knocked on our door.

    Unfortunately, I derived very little satisfaction from saying "I told you so" and smiling smugly into our president's humiliated face.

    --
    My comments here are my own; I do not speak for my employer.
  188. It's Michalangelo all over again! by bugg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I believe that people *love* to hear about the next killer virus/worm that's out there. It's a sort of sick fascination with how easily one person can write something that spreads to thousands of computers that we rely on for so many important things. As someone who has had to disinfect dozens of computers and hundreds of floppies in previous employment, viruses are a headache, but they're also fascinating. It can be a rush to run f-prot and see what you'll find.

    Of course, things are different now. In the DOS heydey (including Windows pre-95), most viruses we re textbook viruses. Today, more of them should be defined as trojans and worms. There's no worm that you can see and say "well isn't that cute" as they all are quite damaging in terms of bandwith utilization. But there were/are many true viruses that are not damaging... or not damaging if caught in time. We all like fire, but nobody likes getting burned.

    Now, back to the subject. Michaelangelo. Back when it was news some ten (egads!) years ago, McAffe was warning everyone of the impending doom. That year there were many people who lost data, but nowhere near as large as some people had believed. To be fair to the AV experts at the time, most of them gave a range from the small to the abnormally large- but guess which figure reporters used to sell papers?

    So, life went on, and nobody was afraid about Michaelangelo anymore. Well, this poor sap was hit by it the *second* time it delivered it's payload (March 6th 1993). I lost of a lot of data that day, and boy was I surprised. Ironically, the data I miss the most is a copy of the virus itself. We all love fire, but we don't love getting burned.

    Studying the interesting viruses was, and is, a really educational and enjoyable thing to do. I do not encourage people to distribute viruses. It's a dick thing to do. But there are plenty out there, and they'll forever live in databases like VSUM and whatnot. The game of virus authors versus AV authors is largely over; but it's still neat to see how different viruses copied themselves, and even more interesting the cryptic lines of text that can so often be found in infected executables.

    Eddie lives...somewhere in time!
    This program was written in the city of Sofia (C) 1988-89 Dark Avenger.

    Call me a hopeless virus romantic (not the VD kind), but I still think that's cool.

    And holy crap, I just realized that the slashdot blackout already started. I apologize, didn't realize this before I typed this all up.

    --
    -bugg
  189. Not overhyped this week... by GeekWithGuns · · Score: 2, Informative

    Monday I ran into W32/Klez.h@MM which was no big deal by itself, but the W95/Elkern.cav.c nailed two computers so bad that they needed to be reinstalled.

    So far at work we have been lucky and never gotten any of the "Hyped" viruses, just all the hoaxex; however, we tend to get the viruses that are not hyped and make small messes.

    I wish that in this case that Klez was all hyped up since then McAfee would have released the DAT file that would detect Elkern. McAfee's website says that DAT 4198 will detect the virus, but they have only released 4198 today!

    --
    [End of diatribe. We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming...] - Larry Wall in Configure from the perl
  190. Connections between IT and fast food by Goldsmith · · Score: 1

    A lot of people in the IT industry have this problem you describe. It comes from being an expert at something most people don't know a thing about. One of the responses to your comment claims "I'm not a burger flipper".

    Well, sorry, you are. Stupid people are stupid people. I HAVE worked in both fast food and IT, and let me tell you, they have the same problems!

    IT people call them "end users", fast food calls them "customers". They are the reason you have a job, and thier job is to try to get every advantage out of you that they can. After cleaning up a virus infestation a few times, they learn that it's your job, and your problem. They treat it that way.

    I'm sorry that the world isn't perfect for you and that even in your nice "computers" job you have to deal with customers. The rest of the world deals with these same people doing similar stuff and doesn't whine about it nearly as much.

  191. Re:Best Anti-Viral Software? The Outlook Uninstall by sjonke · · Score: 1

    You trust Outlook's uninstaller?

    --
    --- What?
  192. Hype? I think not. by sinnergy · · Score: 2



    Don't even start that crap with me today when I've spent all day working on a professor's laptop that has a virus that required a complete reinstall because, for some mysterious reason, he had shut off his anti-virus software. If he had had it running it would have saved about a days worth of my time, which is far more than the cost of the antivirus software in the first place.

    Virii are a big deal and any Windows user without protection is an idiot plain and simple. Antivirus companies make money because their products work pretty well most of the time. Why argue with their ability to make a profit? It's not like they're a monopoly, as there are numerous anti-virus vendors out there.

    I guarantee, too, once Linux/BSD virii become more prevalent, that many of you will be purchasing antivirus software from your vendors. And don't give me this "But I can't get infected because I only run my stuff as a regular user..." blah blah blah. Every bit of software you run probably has an exploit in it. Just wait... the script kiddies just haven't been that creative yet.

  193. Ignorance is bliss by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

    My sister-in-law is the perfect target for a virus. She emails file after file and I'm sure she opens them without thinking when they first come to her. I mentioned that she is aching to get hit, and she just says we have virus protection. I'm thinking she might not get the update in time for what's around the corner. A little training might help, but there is no compensating for lack of common sense.

    --
    Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
  194. Depends on your definition of dangerous by creff · · Score: 1

    Viruses: More Hype than Danger?

    I have a feeling whoever submitted this has never had their personal files emailed to everyone they know. I just recieved a file from my sister who did not keep up with the Microsoft Updates. She got the Klez virus, which is activated when you VIEW your mail in Outlook; you don't have to click on any attachments. All the lectures I gave her about not clicking on attachments useless...

    And what about viruses that delete files, erase hard drives, etc?

  195. Main purpose by NickRob · · Score: 1

    You can't tell me that somebody working at MacAfee or Norton hasn't toyed around with the idea of creating some bad ass virus and unleashing it. Isn't it a little bit odd how quickly they have a fix to it?

    With the media the way it is reacting over these viruses, it won't be belong before upstarts will come along, deciminate a virus, then hold a great number of computer users hostage for the price of their software. There was so much publicity in the tracking down of the people who wrote the Melissa virus and the arrest of them, but has there been such a publicized search for NIMBDA? Red Alert? Perhaps the companies are covering their tracks all too well.

  196. coolness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is so cool

  197. Very cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is very cool

  198. Viruses even come on CDs! by nickyj · · Score: 1

    And for a nominal price of $200+ called Windows XP.

    Is it time already for me to launch winblows.exe already?

    --
    Causing Chaos Everywhere,
    Nik J.
    The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
  199. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
    (chuckles softly) Ever stop to consider that 99% of the "end users" (they are actually called people, or employees... you know the people we support who do the actual WORK that pays our salaries)

    In an ideal world, at least, EVERY person in the company is a required piece without whom the machine does not function. Naturally, some cogs are more easily replaced than others, of course.

    Some people are hard to replace. Exchange admins are not one of them; But real system admins are. In addition, the entire company is screwed without them. They are, in fact, one of the master mechanisms.

    There are definitely other people in the company whose departure would have a greater impact than the sysadmin. There are other people a company cannot really afford to lose who have a lesser impact than the systems admin. But ALL of the people in the upper echelon of importance should be listened to carefully by EVERYONE in the company, and ESPECIALLY the other important people in the company.

    You can see the sysadmin's position as being highly analogous to HR; They do things which let other people do their jobs and not worry about some kind of infrastructure. Without them, the machine does not get oiled, whether we're talking payroll, or the file server. Making their job harder makes EVERYONE suffer, so there should be an immense incentive to pay attention to both people. In addition, both of them require a great deal of specialized knowledge about the field AND about the site.

    So why is it that the HR person is more respected (or I should probably say feared) than the systems admin? Who knows. But great benefits, like not losing all your data, which is ostensibly important to you, can spring from paying attention to the systems admin, so people really should pay attention to them.

    Not to mention... everyone knows that the sysadmin hates talking to the unwashed masses of ignorant employees, so if they bother to do so, you can be sure that it is important. So WTF? PAY ATTENTION TO THE SYSTEMS ADMIN. OTHERWISE YOU MIGHT LOSE ALL YOUR DATA. THAT WOULD BE BAD. THE SYSADMIN IS IMPORTANT. THE COMPUTER IS YOUR FRIEND. HAPPINESS IS MANDAT-

    ...err sorry, got carried away there.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  200. anti virii software cos write the virii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it only makes sense. sales are slowing at mcaffee, lets write a new one and release it from that machine in portugal we compromised last weekend. Some punk kid who has it coming will get the blame and we'll sell lots of software.

    by reading this you have been added to their list of possible patsys.

  201. It was just a warning shot by bryguy5 · · Score: 1

    We need to thank the virus authors that they didn't put serious payloads on Nimda or Code Red or I luv you. Thank them while they are in their jail cell of course, but thank them non the less.

    As it was they were an annoyance to most, not fatal. They did get the message through to businesses that anti-virus security was serious business. I am sure that we are not the only organization that implemented a comprehensive anti-virus system last year.

    It wasn't until we had to spend real man-hours fixing damage done by viruses that the threat was taken seriously and the ROI of the system justifiable by management. It took the potential risk out the equation and made it a simple "duh" cost cutting manuver.

  202. Virus writers wonder "where's the beef?" by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

    There are two classes of malevolent viruses: nuisance viruses, which do nothing more than cause senseless destruction and "make a name" for the author, and voodoo viruses, those looking to use computing resources on a distributed level.

    The first class of virus is only useful when it can attach itself to a a wide area of the population, which is why they're always prevalent in "best of breed" software. Windows, Office, IIS and Outlook are arguably easy to write viruses for, but i content that a lot of the shareware and even open source apps out there are just as easy. Hell, my news reader crashes every time i get a connection to my mail port; it'll probably never be fixed because it's just one guy writing it. But the ease of writing isn't the point -- the point is that these software packages are used by many, many people and even a difficult to exploit bug will have far reaching consequences.

    For the voodoo writer, it's not the number of machines so much as the class of machine that's important. You want fast computers with fast connections (dumbass site admins help too). This means you want a critical bug with lots of power.

    Neither of these class of author will ever write a pda or cell phone virus. Why? Because there are so many different implementations, each markedly different from the others, that an exploit would only apply to a specific phone on a specific provider. I mean, come on! There's not even a unified protocol for ring tones!

    Not to mention that everything is processed by a proxy server before it even hits the phone. Result? A few complaints, and then the proxy is updated to save the phone.

    I love FUD.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  203. Plenty of bite to justify the bark by TVOJ · · Score: 1


    A couple of high-profile viruses made my
    life miserable in different ways for several
    months. I'm somewhat embarrassed to admit that
    it took so long to recognize that a virus was
    involved at all - but there was no complete
    system failure, simply degraded performance and
    flaky behaviour.

    I have no problem with anti-virus companies making
    lots of noise about the dangers involved. If
    Microsoft were truly serious about security they
    would include a subscription to McAffee or Norton
    in every copy of Windows.

  204. A Tough... by NorthDude · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Don't worry about me being paranoiac, I know I am but...

    When I was working at another company few years ago, my president was very fiendly and was enjoying teaching us "marketing" strategies. I found it interesting because it teached me at what levels big corporation are willing to brainwash you. One thing he explained me one day was that a common strategy was to "create the need". Well, we all know this strategy, but he explain me to what extend this could go sometimes. Some company would litteraly "create" you problems to further feed you with their main product. So, my point is this one:
    We know that AntiVirus company make a lot of advertisment for their product, they are big selling software and seems to be a lucrative market. Am I the only thinking that they may feed the market themself? It's so easy to put virus in circulation, anyone can... Would it not be tempting to them to "inject" a few once in a while and release a "security alert"? Then, letting the media go, the hype boosts itself and scares people enough to boost sales? I'm sure it happens...


    I shouldn't skip my medication anymore...

    --


    I'd rather be sailing...
  205. media/vendor hype is not new by CurbyKirby · · Score: 1
    theregister.co.uk had an article (sorry lost the url):
    Stop the antivirus vendor hype
    By: John Leyden
    Posted: 06/03/2001 at 13:57 GMT


    A senior figure in the antivirus industry has spoken out against the misinformation and myths which surround computer viruses - many of which he said arise due to hype from vendors themselves.

    David Perry, global director of education for Trend Micro, said the public harbour a number of common misconceptions about computer viruses, due in large part to overstated warnings about viruses from vendors and sensationalist reporting in the media.

    Perry, who has spent 10 years in technical support, said: "The problem on help desks is only occasionally fixing the damage caused by computer viruses, it's mostly fixing problems caused by lack of understanding."

    His argument is that rumour and innuendo, hoaxes and pop culture create a rich breeding ground for myths about viruses - such as the idea viruses are created by antivirus companies or are able to destroy hardware - that takes focus away from the real issues.

    Perry's central point, made in a speech at the 10th Annual European Institute for Anti Virus Research (EICAR) conference in Munich this week, is that misinformed users can actually increase the likelihood of virus infestation, and more needs to be done close the gap between perceived and actual damage caused by viruses.

    An example of this knowledge deficit, according to Perry, is that of the 30,000 to 50,000 computer viruses routinely quoted in figures from the antivirus industry, only 800 have ever infected anybody's computer and "only 200 are in circulation".

    "The rest are 'zoo' viruses - which are emailed to antivirus companies by virus authors themselves and never make it into the wild," said Perry.

    Perry, who himself admits to having over-hyped viruses in the past, said he re-examined his approach after warnings he made about the NewLove virus, a post Love Bug flop, failed to materialise. He argues virus firms need to be more cautious in issuing alerts - despite the temptation to cry wolf.

    "The antivirus industry is fiercely competitive. There's millions of dollars to be made and lost and firms gets enormous communication value and mind share when they're quoted in reports of virus outbreaks in the press," said Perry. "The firms who tend to cry wolf are those who need coverage at a particular time, and after an alert is issued things tend to take on a life of their own."
    --

    --
    "Extra Anus Kills Four-Legged Chick" -- Headline
  206. Sure they're overhyped - 'til you get one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have readily agreed that viruses were overhyped - 'til I got Nimda on a home PC after wandering onto an infected website with IE 5.x.
    Since I didn't manage to fully disinfect the first time, I ended up rebuilding the entire system from scratch 2x at the cost of at least 10-15 hours of precious weekend labor and much irritation.
    But because of the hype I have no-one to blame but myself (and the webmaster who left his site infected months after a Nimda was known, and of course the Nimda author... but we'll leave them out of this!)
    Seriously, people who surf w/o virus software are like people who smoke despite the surgeon general's warning: we all know it's dangerous because of the hype. I know I'm unlikely to fuss about overblown warnings for quite some time!

  207. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " Perhaps I would be so bitter if I didn't spend 4+ fucking years to get a degree only to end up answering the same remedial questions for careless, rude people. My job is about as challenging and fulfilling as monitoring dirt movement."

    Maybe you picked the wrong major.
    Or maybe you're just insufficiently motivated to get where you want to be with your current education.
    Sorry, but sometimes the truth hurts.

  208. AntiVir,F-prot DOS, etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why are people still paying for Antivirus software??? there are several top end proggies out there

  209. Re:Hype? I think not. by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

    I turned off my antivirus software 9 months ago, I use my windows partition daily.

    I just ran it again, and suprizingly I don't have a virus.

    I have no respect for people who are too stupid to avoid getting a virus, it just takes a half an ounce of prudence.

    --
    I live in a giant bucket.
  210. Not precisely that way... by HiThere · · Score: 2

    People think about things differently. Really. Sometimes it's hard to understand at how basic a level they think differently.

    Different ways of thinking are better at different kinds of jobs. You *will not* get a marketer who's both good at convincing a client and good at understanding software. Those are different skills. (What you may get is a model builder who can explain his models to both the programmer and the marketer.)

    The four basic skills, as I see them, are:
    1) Formal reasoning
    2) Model building
    3) Preference ranking
    4) Goal envisioning
    Everybody is best at one of these. Being best at that, means being worst at a predictable other one.
    So someone who is best at Preference Ranking will be good at marketing, but lousy at following detailed instructions. And someone who is great at Model building will be lousy at Goal envisioning. (These are the pairs that I find predictable.)

    Likewise everyone as a second best skill (which, of course, implies which skill is third best). So some programmers can read a flow chart easily, and other programmers can envision where their code is heading. And these aren't usually the same people (though some people seem to sort of balance on the cusp there).

    So Joe in sales doesn't follow your directions not because he's angry at you, and not because he's a real doofus, and not because ... well, he may just not have understood you, because you didn't speak his language.

    As a general rule I find that the non-technical people I deal with don't understand my natural way of speaking. I need to make a model or explain how it fits into their goals to really catch their attention. About 1/4 of the people will just understand the instructions. For about another half you'll need to catch their attention somehow, and then they'll be able to follow the instructions (somehow because two different approaches are needed here).

    For the remaining 1/4, following detailed instructions is a real problem. Because that's not the way they think. Best if you can fold everything into a file that you can tell them "Just run this". If that's really impossible, then try to both make a model of what needs to be done (that the instructions fit into naturally) and explain how it fits into their goals. (I always find this so difficult that I generally do the last few people myself.)

    But just imagine that you had to spend your time schmoozing... and choosing which people to pay attention to, which to ignore, etc. (I can't explain it correctly, because I don't understand it myself. But I've seen those skilled in the art in action, and I know when something is totally beyond me.)

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  211. Re:Training... by HiThere · · Score: 2

    Training? Some of them are trainable. But only some.

    Being intelligent is in no way the same as being able to understand computers. That's one kind of intelligence. Some people just don't have that kind. Because a kind of intelligence that confilicts with that is associated with successful manipulation of people, many of them are managers, public relations people, marketers, salesmen, etc.

    I'm not saying they aren't intelligent. I couldn't learn to do what they do, and they couldn't learn to do what I do. Our intelligences are different. But they are sufficiently different that attempts to train them in computer understanding (rather then simple manipulation) are destined for failure.

    At least that's the way I see it.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  212. Meanwhile... by Kris_J · · Score: 2

    ..last week saw my work being bombarded by that annoying Outlook exploit and automated warning messages that were being sent to the wrong person because the From: line is taken from the infected person's contact list. And our student labs pick up at least a dozen viruses every day (usually about 3 or 4 different ones). Yeah, it's hype.

  213. Macintosh viruses are almost nonexistant. by Archeopteryx · · Score: 2

    There have only ever been a handful of Macintosh viruses, excluding Word Macro Viruses. (Which are entirely due to M$'s incompentance.) Yes, I have a virus scanner, but I've only EVER found one infected file in the 17 years I've used Macs.

    --
    Dog is my co-pilot.
  214. Real Network Admins (veering off-topic) by Jaeger · · Score: 2
    Net admins don't read CNN to learn about virus outbreaks

    No, of course not. Real network admins know everything about their networks by watching the link lights on their switches. Since they can see the contents of the packets that are being sent and recieved, all they need to do is decode the packet in real time. Junior admins occassionally have problems mastering the ip checksum algorithms, but well-practiced senior net admins can track thousands of concurrent TCP connections. It's a simple matter to determine what the network is being used for just by watching the blinking lights.

    And you thought those light were just to look pretty. Ha!

    1. Re:Real Network Admins (veering off-topic) by guanxi · · Score: 1

      ...and no wonder nobody wants to roll out ipv6.

  215. MS must be very happy to hear this by theolein · · Score: 1

    Now that they can claim it's all hype they don't have to make secure software anymore.

  216. Ever hear of MSAV/MWAV ? by eggstasy · · Score: 1

    The later versions of MS-DOS came with MSAV, and Windows 3.x came with MWAV.
    MSAV - MicroSoft AntiVirus
    MWAV Microsoft Windows AntiVirus

    Thing is, they sucked, and I had no idea where to get updates, or even if they were updatable at all, whereas I had a fresh evaluation floppy of McAffee every month for free!
    I have no idea why they canned their anti-virus.It would be very useful to most windows lusers to have an anti-virus installed by default on their boxen. It would sure save me a lot of trouble... and probably put a stop to the ever-growing email worm epidemic.Just have it auto-update itself like the rest of XP and you're home free.

  217. Re:Real Network Admins (veering further off-topic) by guanxi · · Score: 1

    Ha. Actually, Counterpane, Bruce Schneier's company, offers realtime live security monitoring by humans; I presume even they view the traffic in some interpreted, filtered state.

    I meant merely that hopefully a Net Admin has a faster, more comprehensive, reliable and detailed source than CNN, such as CERT, some other mailing lists, or their AV vendor.

  218. Not a threat?? by sapphire42 · · Score: 1

    While they may not cripple the internet, virii cost corporations ALOT OF MONEY. I work in the service industry, and EVERY DAY I am at some company to clean virii off of machines. These aren't large companies with IT people, these are the small business where every machine gets decimated by virii that can't be cleaned with wiping the system, and if they are cleanable, the files are OFTEN corrupted and of no use. Of course, these are also small business that never thought of backup. Virii might be good for my business, but when these companies are paying me $65 an hour (or my boss) to clean them when they get them every time (because that handy antivirus we put on their machines last time hasn't been updated since we left), it gets expensive.

  219. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by lazy_greenhouse_gas · · Score: 1

    Obviously the guy is pissed..and frustrated. The point here is that the work they do is enabled by the tools they use which is in our care. If you rented a room in a non-smoking house and smoked all the time you'd get kicked out eventually. Your reasons for doing this: whether, stupidity, assumption of intellectual superiority, addiction, etc..is not the issue. There should be consequences for fouling up the works. If managment cannot control the situation it is unfair to assume that the SA can do any better. As far as talking down to users... There are some users who will browbeat, circumlocute and sneak their way into trouble consistently. If managment will not act then as self defense I tend to treat them like shit. I can empathize with the guy to some degree: If you are willing to take home a paycheck you should be willing to obey all the rules set out by IT staff towards enabling and keeping your environment working. Without this the end user and policy is the problem and the SA attitude is a natural outgrowth of the situation. A strong, policied and enforced environment is productive and secure, a loose "do what you want" environment is recipe for disaster unless everyone has the technical acumen of the SA.

  220. Re:Best Anti-Viral Software? The Outlook Uninstall by The+Cookie+Monster · · Score: 1
    The only way you can get a virus nowadays, is to start up Outlook
    There are now two ways nowadays to get a virus. One is to start up Outlook (as you say), the other is to have someone on your network start up Outlook who has one of your drives mapped and writeable (There may even be viruses now that don't need the drive to be mapped).

    But yeah, I've never bothered with AV software (or security beyond the LAN being firewalled) and the extend of damage viruses have caused me is the inconvenience of no longer wanting to leave drives shared-writable :(

    Ahh those were days... you could leave your front door unlocked and just copy anything to your computer from anywhere transparently.
  221. Depends on your opinion... by nologin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If the past year's viruses were all hype, I have to wonder how serious a virus has to be before they actually claim them as dangerous.

    Thanks to SirCam, I personally received two documents from Fortune 500 companies (which were infected) with draft proposals for new products and the markets they were targetted for. I get to know the plans of a big company even before their CEO does.

    Thanks to CR/Nimda, I get to see at least 100 probes a day trying to get to my personal web server. On more active days, that number is more like 500. And this is now, over 8 months after the virus was at its peak.

    I know of at least a few administrators (that work at various companies) that had to put in about a week to get the "I love you" virus under control. And that virus didn't even have a nasty payload.

    Mind you, they could have been much worse. The simple fact is that most of these viruses were born from stupid bugs (which in most cases were simply overlooked) and hence were somewhat easier to fix.

  222. CodeRed is still wasting bandwidth by iMikey · · Score: 1

    As of about a month ago, I was able to take advantage of the fact that CodeRed is still out there wasting bandwidth. I benefitted from it because it's continually trying to spread itself, which generates zillions of unanswered ARP requests.

    I was looking for an unused IP address to *borrow* (for use on a non-DHCP-enabled laptop), so I started a packet sniffer and waited for an unanswered ARP to go by -- in less than a minute, I had my new IP address.

    Thanks CodeRed!

  223. 400th prost!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    400th comment!! Viruses!!! LINUX!!

    1. Re:400th prost!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      401 Prost!! yes, WE have YAKISOYBA!!!

  224. 9 years, no viruses... by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

    In the 9 years I've been playing around with computers, I haven't gotten a single virus. This despite the fact that I've been running Windows and Outlook for years.

    Really, it's not that hard... don't open attachments unless you're expecting 'em, don't enable VBScript... no real need for it anyways!

  225. Since Mosaic times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been downloading innumerable Terabytes of various software since 1993 when the Mosaic browser was around. I have never had a virus infection on my computer. And, still, I have mostly used DOS/Win computers until the last few years when I switched to Linux.

    I know, I am not statistically significant, but still... ;)

  226. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by mpe · · Score: 2

    By your logic, you're focusing the burden of responsibility to the admin and not the end user. So I guess it's MY fault they opened the attatchment. I guess it's MY fault that I have to order a new laptop everytime this paticular sales lady goes out on travel and returns with a mangled laptop because "It's too much trouble to carry it on" This paticular lady i'm thinking of DESTROYED 9 laptops in 3 months! You would think MAYBE after the first one she would wise up BUT SHE KILLED 8 MORE.

    Often, as in this example it's the same end (l)users who do stupid things time and time again. But typically the sysadmin isn't in a position to say "you break it, then fixing it is at the bottom of the priority list".

  227. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by mpe · · Score: 2

    Easy to say when you have a good job. I consider them PEOPLE when they HELP ME HELP THEM to solve their problem. When they are lazy ("oh, just send someone up. I don't have time to sit on the phone all day."), unecessarily vague ("Is the Internet down?"), or rude, they are not people.

    There is the all time classic "dosn't work". Including in cases where the computer is working perfectly, just that GIGO applies.

  228. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by tomknight · · Score: 1
    Hey, if you're surfing through mail logs and you know what you're looking for, then you have the time and ability to ensure people's virus protection is up to date.

    Do your job properly and stiop whinging.

    Tom.

    --
    Oh arse
  229. Y2K by koekepeer · · Score: 1

    hey,

    it was very neccesary to do Y2K updates in a lot of cases. maybe the world wouldn't have crawled to a halt but there would've been a *lot* of people complaining because they weren't born, didn't need to receive a paycheck, etc "because the computer says so". those problems needed fixes, be it before or after 1-1-2000.

    the fact that the IT industry earned plenty money because of the Y2K problem might be a ground to distrust some of the stories on Y2K but it *was* neccesary to fix Y2K!

  230. Re:Elitism and the reason why users just don't lis by t0qer · · Score: 2

    But typically the sysadmin isn't in a position to say "you break it, then fixing it is at the bottom of the priority list".


    YES!! Exactly! If you spend %15 of your time on one user in a month because they constantly are breaking something, other people get jaded that they are not recieving enough attention. Collecting all the parts, getting the shipping, calling the vendor for a RMA#, shipping the thing back and imaging the software back onto the machine when the machine comes back takes TIME. Time that has to be balanced out or otherwise it just put's the admin in a position where he/she might be taking precious IT resources away from other departments. If you cannot balance yourself out between all the departments in a company because of one person, i'm sorry but they're an asshole for not being consciences. They're not thinking about the time it takes me to replace the equipment, the cost to the company, the CEO's and salespeoples time for making the money to pay for the damn equipment in the first place.

  231. blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    This buffer is for notes you don't want to save, and for Lisp evaluation.
    If you want to create a file, visit that file with C-x C-f,
    then enter the text in that file's own buffer.

    aoeu aoeu aoeu aoe uaoe uao u aoeu aoeu ao aoeuaoeuaoe ua oeu aoeu
    aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu
    aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aeou aoe uaoe uaoe
    uaoeu aeo aoeu aoe uaoeu aoeu aueo

    aoeu

    aoeu

    (autoload 'wrap-mode "~/wrap-mode.el" "Toggle wrapping." t)

    aoeu ao aoeuaoeuaoe aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu
    aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu
    aoeu aeou aoe uaoe uaoe uaoeu aeo aoeu aoe uaoeu aoeu aueo

    aoeu ao aoeuaoeuaoe ua oeu aoeu
    aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu
    aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aoeu aeou aoe uaoe uaoe
    uaoeu aeo aoeu aoe uaoeu aoeu aueo