Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Opts-In Hotmail Users

medeii writes "East Side Journal reports that without telling anyone, Microsoft has suddenly changed the privacy preferences for all Hotmail users. They're now sharing your name and other personal information with third parties, even if you said you didn't want that when you signed up. (If you're a user, login, go to Options > Personal Profile, and un-check the boxes at the bottom of that page.)" The same reporter has written a follow-up article today.

194 of 605 comments (clear)

  1. You think that's bad? by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll do you one better.

    Mozilla users can't access Options->Personal Profile to opt out.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:You think that's bad? by zaffir · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Neither can Opera users who identify themselves as either Opera or Mozilla. Switch the identifier to IE 5.0, however, and the personal profile page suddenly works perfectly. Way to go, MS.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    2. Re:You think that's bad? by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't matter. All they had to do is sell it once to some unscrupulous company in the minutes when the box was unchecked, and the dammage is done. There's no web form that can undo it. The effectively have licence to the data in your account during that brief period. Ingenious of them. Glad I don't have an account there.

    3. Re:You think that's bad? by doubtless · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Microsoft® .NET Passport no longer supports the Web browser version you are using. Please upgrade to a current Web browser, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer version 4.0 or later, or Netscape Navigator version 4.08 or later.

      Netscape navigator 4.08 or later is supported, but not my Mozilla 0.99? a step backward? or basically just not going to be friendly towards open source?

      this sucks.

      --
      geek page at KY speaks
    4. Re:You think that's bad? by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People smart enough to use mozilla should be smart enough to not trust their personal info to microsoft either.

      --
      "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
    5. Re:You think that's bad? by homer_ca · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's right. Fake name, fake birthday, ZIP code 90210. But I did an oopsie when I went in to change my profile. Just to be funny, I thought I give them an even faker birthday than the fake one I put in, but I locked myself out of my account because now it thinks I'm 3 years old and I need my parent's permission to confirm my account. Oh well, guess I'll have to make another fake hotmail account with an adult age to give my first account his parent's permission.

    6. Re:You think that's bad? by ender81b · · Score: 2, Informative

      In opera, at least, I can change my preferences to mimik IE 6.0 or 5.0. Try that if you have it. I thought there was something like this in mozilla, guess not. oh, you also can't d/l attachments with an 'incompatible' browser. Makes no sense - everything works fine when I set opera to indentify itself as MSIE 6.0 but... oh well.

      I could go on-and-on about how retarded, backwards, non-standards compliant this is but... it's microsoft. Go Figure.

    7. Re:You think that's bad? by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 2
      Microsoft doesnt care about standard's compliance to non-microsoft standards.

      btw, does anyone know if their is a user-agent spoofing feature in galeon? or when they plan to add one.

      --
      "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
    8. Re:You think that's bad? by FearUncertaintyDoubt · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Netscape navigator 4.08 or later is supported, but not my Mozilla 0.99? a step backward? or basically just not going to be friendly towards open source?

      Well, they weren't found guilty of trying to run Mozilla out of business, just Netscape. I'm sure they're sensitive to charges that they are deliberately breaking compatibility with Netscape. But they're free to crush everyone else.

    9. Re:You think that's bad? by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, this is one of the worst parts about doing business online, there is no way of millions of people to prove that they didnt check the box in the first place. Microsoft could just say that they all checked it on their own accord. Surely their is some law making it illegal to modify a contract after it has been agreed to without telling the other party. And surely just because we accept a contractual agreement Online, doesnt mean we give the other party full rights to do whatever the hell they want to what we agree to.

      --
      "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
    10. Re:You think that's bad? by numark · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm using Opera 6.02 for Win, identifying as Mozilla 4.78, and the page worked just fine for me. I don't know about 6.01, which you may still be using (6.02 was just released a day or two ago). Probably was just some minor issue in earlier versions of Opera. I know I'd had problems with other Hotmail features before upgrading, so just updating Opera should help anyone having the same problem.

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    11. Re:You think that's bad? by Quay42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I sent off a nice long comment to Hotmail about this very fact (I'm sure they'll ignore it). Basically I mentioned the fact that they should just give me the damn HTML and let *me* decide it its supported. And since it was basically a simple form, even Lynx could handle it.

      If you got to Help, there a link at the bottom to send comments. Select "other" from there so that you can actually put in your comment.

      --
      "Has anything you've done made your life better?" - American History X
    12. Re:You think that's bad? by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like a plan, lets spam hotmail and tell them to make it easier for us to make it harder for them to spam us.

      --
      "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
    13. Re:You think that's bad? by Swaffs · · Score: 2

      Worse yet, I try and edit it with IE instead of Moz RC2, and IE hangs and hoses my system! On Win2k! WTF??

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    14. Re:You think that's bad? by gmhowell · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't you read anything? Everyone knows that if they support Mozilla, they will have to open source Excel. It's those damned viral licenses.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    15. Re:You think that's bad? by (outer-limits) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A blatant case of breach of contract, but if the might of the US Govt can't sue them, what hope has anyone else got. Go on MS, do what you want. Short of a civil war, there is nothing else that can stop them.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    16. Re:You think that's bad? by greenfly · · Score: 2

      Of course you realize this isn't whether the browser can handle the page, but what browser it says it is (people have gotten these browsers to work fine just by claiming to be IE).

      To go with your analogy, it would be like a craftsman 10mm nut refusing to fit a socket wrench if it didn't say Craftsman, but the moment you put a Craftsman label on your generic socket, it would let it fit.

    17. Re:You think that's bad? by 56ker · · Score: 2

      I don't use my hotmail account anymore - or MSN Messenger - sounds like a good time to delete it.

    18. Re:You think that's bad? by soloport · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ok. That was fun!

      I got all panicky and changed my preferences. Then I figured, if they're (obviously) not going to protect my privacy, why give away personal information?

      So, thinking my birth-year information matters (it does to me) I put a bogus "1999" in the appropriate place. What resulted was an endless loop of the silly system asking "Is your parent there with you? [Yes] [No]" in a Microsoft .NET "Kids" page!

      When I clicked "Yes", it asked for Passport login info. (I only have one Passport account). When I clicked "No" it asked for my name and my parents e-mail address. In other words, I'm now LOCKED out of an account I've had for four years!

      Now what e-mail address am I going to use to register with at spam-bombers, like 1-800-FLOWERS.com or ILLUMINATIONS.com or IMSI.com? Or what about when bots no longer find my hotmail.com address at InterNIC? Will I miss all that spam?

      (Yes, I got blocked the first attempt, too, using Konqueror; Switched to NS 4.78 :-(

    19. Re:You think that's bad? by jnana · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Using a free service doesn't mean that you have no rights. The price of the service and the rights you do or don't have are totally independent.

      What amounts to you having no rights, though, is that you probably clicked through an agreement in order to activate the account that said microsoft is free to change the terms and conditions of the account at any time, without notice. It's fucked up, and totally unethical, but borderline legal -- what else would you expect from Microsoft?

    20. Re:You think that's bad? by SmileyBen · · Score: 2

      That's a silly argument. That's like saying the best compiler is the one that manages to do *something* with completely incorrect code. Never mind that what you wrote won't compile in any other compiler, or that the program doesn't actually do anything like what you meant it to... The point of standards is that you *don't* have ambiguity. It shouldn't be that browsers have any decision in how to render the important things (sure, some things like UI elements can be browser specific). But people *should* write flawless HTML - otherwise there's no reason why different browsers should render what they write the same...

    21. Re:You think that's bad? by mpe · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's right. Fake name, fake birthday, ZIP code 90210. But I did an oopsie when I went in to change my profile. Just to be funny, I thought I give them an even faker birthday than the fake one I put in, but I locked myself out of my account because now it thinks I'm 3 years old and I need my parent's permission to confirm my account.

      Maybe if people want to put in fake data they should give a date of birth before 1900 and fill in "vampire" under occupation.

    22. Re:You think that's bad? by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      wrong wrong wrong

      The worst part about IE being sloppy in what it accepts is that HTML authors who preview their page don't even get to find out that something is wrong.

      damn that does kill the doctrine
      "be generous in the data you accept but strict on the data you hand out"

      It should be an option in IE to report all non-conforming HTML

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    23. Re:You think that's bad? by SmileyBen · · Score: 2

      Well if that's the case, the person I was replying to is still wrong. IE isn't the best as substituting fonts or whatever, any browser can do that. It's the serious html errors that IE 'excels' at - it will display pretty much any page, however little the code resembles an instruction to display what it in fact produces...

    24. Re:You think that's bad? by peddrenth · · Score: 3, Informative

      I presume most people here run websites. Many people have privacy policies (or other such useful but non-vital information) and PHP/Perl is pretty standard.

      Put the following code on your privacy policy page:


      <?php
      if (index(getenv("USER_AGENT"),"MSIE")>0)
      {
      echo "<p>We have detected you are using a non-standard browser which may not display this page properly. Please upgrade to Galeon 0.2 or later, Mozilla 0.9 or later, or any version of Netscape Navigator</p>";
      }
      else
      {
      /* Put your website's privacy policy here */
      }
      ?>
    25. Re:You think that's bad? by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      First off, if you haven't used your account in "weeks", it's probably deactivated. If you let the account go idle for 30 days it goes poof.

      Second, what new disclaimer? There isn't one. And I just checked my hotmail account - it was indeed changed to "share e-mail address" and "share other personal information". "Share first and last name" was not checked though.

      Not that it matters much. The flood of spam to my hotmail account has grown so bad I'm probably going to abandon it. And I've had that account for 6 years now.

    26. Re:You think that's bad? by jalefkowit · · Score: 2

      Mozilla doesn't have a pointy-clicky way to change the useragent out of the box, but you can add that with the Mozilla Useragent Toolbar. That's what I used (on Moz 1.0 RC1) and it got me past Hotmail's browser Nazism without a problem. Many thanks to David Illsley (developer of uabar) for the nifty add-on!


      -- Jason Lefkowitz

    27. Re:You think that's bad? by Art+Tatum · · Score: 2

      I agree 100%. Where can I download my Linux version of IE? Or my OPENSTEP/Mach 4.2 version?

    28. Re:You think that's bad? by zsmooth · · Score: 2

      Yeah, make it so 95% of the world can't get to your website. Genius. I'm sure everyone's going to do that right away.

    29. Re:You think that's bad? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Perhaps not entire sites, but I can think of pages that this might make a reasonable first layer of security for. This way they (i.e., MSIE users) wouldn't even know that they were being blocked for security reasons. That would leave the 5% that would need to be checked via passwords, etc. (of course, for those pages that would be nearly 100% of the visitors, but the check is simple enough).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    30. Re:You think that's bad? by jnana · · Score: 2

      I don't expect much else from companies, and i think you're probably right that most other companies in the same position would do the same -- which is not to say that Microsoft isn't in a league of its own for other reasons. How sad it is that people and companies are like this. This endemic selfishess will be our downfall. But maybe i'm just a bit of a pessimist...

  2. Surprise! by dieMSdie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And this is surprising, how?

    I mean, come on, this is Micro$oft we are talking about here... marketing, marketing, marketing!

    Besides, Yahoo led the way, did they not? I would not be surprised to find out that Microsoft watched that whole Yahoo business very closely, and saw the complete lack of any outcry as a "green light" to go forward with this.

    --
    Don't throw your computer out the window, throw the Windows out of your computer!
    1. Re:Surprise! by erc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's it going to take? Anyone for a class-action lawsuit against both Yahoo and Microsoft?

      --
      -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
    2. Re:Surprise! by stcanard · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, there's outcry and there's outcry.

      I had been using Yahoo email for a long time, and was planning to pay for the service since it was useful. Because of their change, I sent a letter to Yahoo indicating why I would not pay for the service, and am now using a new address.

      My yahoo address is still open, however, so I can catch the stragglers that haven't caught up yet. So from a superficial (number of users pov), yes, it appears that this didn't affect their business, but what you don't know is how many people like me changed their mind about paying for the service, or the trust that they had placed in Yahoo.

      The future will tell if the same thing happens with Microsoft. I don't have a hotmail address because I knew better than to trust Microsoft, but a lot of people didn't. The question isn't really (like Yahoo) whether this will cost them hotmail addresses, but whether this will cost them $ in future service offerings like the larger mailboxes.

    3. Re:Surprise! by MrHanky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, and this could explain why certain words are impossible to block in Hotmail -- like "debt". There's one single company I've tried to block in any way, but it's just not possible.

    4. Re:Surprise! by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Then you didn't notice. Slashdot cared. It's just that there was no outcry from the public. My guess of the reason is that they didn't understand what was happening, and don't know yet. This will probably also hold true for MS.

      Another possibility, of course, is that they never believed the claims of privacy anyway. After all, they're as reilable as TrustE. Which has a pretty shabby history.

      I think that my old Yahoo account was linked to an address that no longer works. I sure hope so, because it's long expired (unless it's the source of the recent influx of spam that I've been getting .. perhaps spam keeps it alive).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Surprise! by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2

      Unless you are talking about Microsoft, you can add Microsoft to the list of companies that you can't block. That is, unless you've found a way to block those messages from Hotmail Member Services.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  3. Trust. . . . by Com2Kid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't care how good MS's software gets;

    they can spend all of the money that they want making their software better and better (hey, Win2K does indeed rock. Heh. :) ) but fact is;

    keep pissing people off and they will lose customers faster then 'software security audits' up to hell will gain them customers.

    (oh yah, and not making each OS more and more bleeping 'beautified' would be nice as well, I swear, if I wanted a pretty-boy interface I would've bought a mac!)

    ::hopes somebody hurries up and forces McNeel software to port Rhino3d to other x86 platforms. Is willing to provide crowbar to volenteer 'encourages' if necessary::

  4. Funny, by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Considering the amount of spam I get at my Hotmail accounts, I'm surprised that they haven't been doing this all along.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Funny, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please, young retard, if you're going to troll, read the fine tutorials at TrollAxor first. Then troll OSNews, and then, when you're good and ready, come back here and try your hand with the big boys.

      Unfortunately, your troll had nothing whatsoever going for it. Every article Jon Katz has ever posted is a better troll than that impotent little one-liner you just farted out onto the world. Here's some quick pointers to get you started on your road to Jedi Trolldom:

      Your username is stupid. Big time. REAL trolls have intelligence and wit. You do not. So you know a letter. Big deal. Learn a few more and maybe I'll be impressed. Here's a couple for you, F U.

      Good trolls are based in reality. They attack the victim at his heart - his precious belief structure. Now, did I mention Linux in my post? No, you pathetic beaver snot, I didn't. How are you supposed to draw flames when everybody knows you're a moron from the word 'go'? Flame Linux all you want, I don't care. If you wanna piss people off, at least call it Gnu/Linux and add a .sig flaming Mac OS X for not being GPLed. Jeezus! And for God's sake, watch your spelling! Trolling is an art form. Are you Vincent Van Troll or just some punkass graffiti artist? Have some respect, man! Stand up straight! Shoulders back, chest out!

      Your 'free as in beer' reference is very very gay, much like you. It's so overused here I can't even begin to describe how boring it is. Mundane. It doesn't do it anymore. Instead, say "It's free, like your mama every Saturday night down at Chippy's Ho Bar. I can't wait to get her on that pool table and put my 8-ball in her corner pocket again, you know what I mean? I hope the lineup's shorter this week. Last week, the line was so long, I thought she was the new Star Wars movie." And hell, man, that's off the top of my head. You need to buy my trolling tapes, available on VHS and DVD, now only 19 easy payments of $49.99 each! Only *YOU* can change your life - only *I* can show you how.

      "Take that spam and shove it". Oh god. What a weakass clincher. Your final line has to be your best line. Don't they teach you guys anything anymore? It has to enrage the righteous and amuse the wicked. You've got it all wrong. Misquoting some crappy 80's Contemporary Country Classic will only bring up fond memories. What you want is for them to bring up last Thursday's Veal Picatta.

      Look, I'm sorry, son. Your heart's in the right place, but until you get better, you should maybe do some volunteer trolling for the 'BSD is dead' guy, or join the Goatse.cx team. You're not good enough to make it on your own yet. But don't lose hope. We were all young hotheaded trolls at one time or another. I've been right where you are now. Actually, I was there yesterday at lunch when I was shagging your sister on the dishwasher.

      Keep at it. You have to be a bit more creative, and a bit more shocking. Don't just insult the guy, DESTROY HIS MIND! And supporting Microsoft won't draw as much action as flaming them - there's more pro-MS people on Slashdot now than ever, and they're all serious and gullible (obviously - they use Windows) and love to pick fights with the Open Source people. And despite having 95% market share, they're strangely bitter and paranoid. Perfect targets. Stupid oxen waiting to be pushed off a cliff. Do it. The force is strong in you, young one. Just think about the troll. Focus. Make the troll bend to your will. Become the troll.

      I believe in you. You just need to focus, and channel the force into a razorsharp assault on decency - much like Cowboy Neal with those nude photos of him dressed as Sailor Moon. Truly the work of a mad genius. Magnificent.

      Dr. Zoob Z. Zooberman
      Professor of the Slashdot Trolling Academy
      Home Ec. Department

      P.S. I am going to be admitting myself to the Mister T Psychiatric Hospital tomorrow morning for a voluntary complete Cranial Relapsation with optional Chemodynamic purge, so I won't be able to respond to your questions and comments until Monday at the least, when I get my new brain from Igor down at the lab. Sorry for the inconvenience.

    2. Re:Funny, by gillbates · · Score: 2
      And I get so much spam anyway, it doesn't matter!

      Seriously, though, the only thing I use my hotmail account for is registering email @'s at various webpages (like the NY Times, which /. seems to love...)

      But regardless, what does it matter how much spam I get? It's just taking up disk space on Microsoft servers. You would think that hotmail would want to limit spam, because they (MSN) are paying for the bandwidth and the disk space. So I say, spam away, spammers! As soon as the bandwidth cap is reached, and the servers run out of disk space, hotmail will finally see the true wisdom of selling subscriber addresses...

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    3. Re:Funny, by mgv · · Score: 2

      If you are as like me, and filter out the -1's then I'll just quite post the original troll here. Its not that I approve of trolling, but the above response was so funny it made me go check the original. So, to save you a mouseclick:

      Re:Funny, (Score:-1)
      by MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM on Thursday May 16

      Stop whinning you fucking Linux hippies. How much money did you shell out to sign up for that hotmail account? $0.00 It's free as in beer. Now take that spam and shove it!

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
  5. Switch to myrealbox.com by ksuMacGyver · · Score: 2, Informative

    They have free email and no advertising appending. =)

    --

    Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam

    Interested in AI? MACR
  6. this makes sense by spookysuicide · · Score: 2
    Can't anyone give hotmail a break? They're just a poor start up company trying to figure out a way to generate revenue.

    What? Microsoft owns them? Their chairman is the richest man in the world? Well then, I guess there isn't much of an excuse to defraud customers, unless of course that is the way you become a hugely successful company...

    --
    yes i run a goth/punk/emo porn site.
  7. Privacy Subscription? by 3seas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So now you don't even have to tell every company and their brothers company that you do business with that you want your privacy, but you have to do it monthly???

    Shouldn't privacy be a default thing to respect? Why should I have to constantly defend it?

    Can I charge for infringment of my privacy? (like charging for spam?)

    "To request your privacy options, tell us your life history. We want to make sure it's you, before we consider granting you temporary privacy."

    If you do not allow us to use up bandwidth sending you stuff you do not want then you should pay us for lost revenues.

  8. Re:Alternatives? by spookysuicide · · Score: 5, Funny
    my mac.com email is free, web-based, devoid of banners, and apple probably wouldn't pull this kinda crap.

    ok maybe they would, but you'd probably only getty pretty spam from them.

    --
    yes i run a goth/punk/emo porn site.
  9. Re:This never would have happened by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny
    If the lawmakers would get their shit together and pass some laws outlawing the sharing of data, this kind of crap wouldn't happen.

    I'd be a whole lot richer if my employer didn't share my salary data with the IRS!

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  10. New TOS? by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I went to disable that option and found out my account had been disabled since I didn't log in in 30 days. I click the "reactivate link" thinking I should reactivate and then uncheck that option, but upon reactivating I had to accept the terms of service again. You think you've seen some long ones before? Basically they're saying by accepting one, I'm accepting them all. Is it legal to agree to one document that links to terms in another document?

    The following is quoted from their TOS:

    The MSN Web Sites are offered to you conditioned on your acceptance without modification of the terms, conditions, and notices contained herein. Your use of the MSN Web Sites constitutes your agreement to all such terms, conditions, and notices. Your use of a particular MSN Web Site included within the MSN Web Sites may also be subject to additional terms outlined elsewhere in this agreement (the "Additional Terms"). To go directly to any of the Additional Terms, click on the link below:

    Carpoint

    GamingZone

    MSN Health

    MSN Money

    HomeAdvisor

    MSN Hotmail

    Encarta Online

    MSN Mobile

    MSN Music

    MSN Shopping (eShop)

    MSNBC

    Auctions

    MSN Photos

    Additionally, the MSN Web Sites may themselves contain additional terms, codes of conduct or guidelines that govern use of those sites, including without limitation, particular features or offers (for example, sweepstakes or chat areas).

    1. Re:New TOS? by saveth · · Score: 2

      MSN Money

      If the new MSN Money license is anything like the new Hotmail license, any sane user should contact their lawyer right away. Selling off email addresses and phone numbers is one thing, but what about accounts? Portfolios? Stock information? What about using all this for some sort of convoluted insider trading scheme?

      This may seem a bit paranoid, but Microsoft has the best lawyers in the world. If they want, they can get away with anything.

  11. Re:Notice by MImeKillEr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, this is why you create fake accounts and/or give false information. Never assume/believe that a company (especially MicroSoft) will act in good faith and keep the public's interests at heart - its not profitable.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  12. WTF? by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 2

    So... as near as I can tell, Hotmail can be accessed fine using Mozilla. At least, I haven't had problems before. And now, when I try to get to the Personal Profile page, I get this:


    Browser Not Supported

    Microsoft® .NET Passport no longer supports the Web browser version you are using. Please upgrade to a current Web browser, such as Microsoft Internet Explorer version 4.0 or later, or Netscape Navigator version 4.08 or later.

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
    1. Re:WTF? by banky · · Score: 2

      I get this at least once a week; it appears to either be a transient JS bug, or there's some random "screw over non-IE users" code somewhere... :)

      --
      ZOMG I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS ON MACINTOSH VERSUS WINDOWS, VI VERSUS EMACS, AND HOW YOU'RE NOT A DORK
  13. People should get vanity email addresses by Argyle · · Score: 3, Redundant

    This is probably the 100th time there's been mention of trouble with the free webmail systems like Yahoo and Hotmail that people have had.

    It really is worth the money to own a domain and get an email address that no one can fsck with.

    Benefits:
    Not based on your ISP
    No privacy issues
    Multiple email accounts for different purposes
    Can utilize forwarding to webmail

    --
    nuclear iraq bioweapon encryption cocaine korea terrorist
    1. Re:People should get vanity email addresses by Croaker · · Score: 2
      No privacy issues

      Except, of course, that you need to give a contact address to get a domain, which ends up being available to anyone who knows how to use whois. And you have to give out personal information to a registrar, who might turn right around and sell that info to any number of lists (i.e. what Network Solutions decided to do).

    2. Re:People should get vanity email addresses by warpSpeed · · Score: 2


      So get a PO Box, and check it once a year...

    3. Re:People should get vanity email addresses by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      I gave no address for my free domain via (www.dhs.org). Of course one could argue, I'm still at the mercy of a service provider.

    4. Re:People should get vanity email addresses by Erris · · Score: 2

      An address is usless without a machine to recieve the mail. You can be lucky enough to live in an are where a non Bell DSL company has a line for you or tie up a phone line all day to do this. Cable modem people are mostly out of luck. I know not about satilite and other means of connecting.

      --
      DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    5. Re:People should get vanity email addresses by peter · · Score: 2

      In Nova Scotia (on the east coast of Canada), cable modem service provided by Eastlink gives you an IP address that is usually static, but can change due to network upgrades, etc. (Mine hasn't changed for almost a year, but before that it changed once a month for a few months.) They use DHCP and give you an IP corresponding to your ethernet HW address. I've been running my mail server through my cable modem for years. DSL around here (from MTT) is behind a ridiculous NAT firewall, so you get a 10.0.0.0 IP address, and your "external" IP address changes every 15 minutes. (They do manage to avoid breaking established TCP connections, though.)

      Anyway, cable vs. DSL has nothing to do with the firewall/other annoyance policy at the ISP.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  14. Oh, just an oversight.. by nolife · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As with most issues of this nature..
    If the story hits big, and big media starts questioning the practice, MS will claim that it was a programing error, it was changed but they actually have no plans to really share that data, or it was strictly an "accident" in preparing for some upcoming vapor feature they planned on adding or testing. Sorry..

    If it doesnt hit big the plan will stay put and 99.9% of the users will never know.
    Another reason I always use completely bogus information for these registration things.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    1. Re:Oh, just an oversight.. by FattMattP · · Score: 2

      Yeah, you'd think they'd know how to type "rollback."

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
  15. This is nothing like Yahoo by Fjord · · Score: 2

    I remember reading the opt-out email from Yahoo. I don't remember the one from HotMail. In fact, the last email I got from them said

    "As a Hotmail member, you have received this e-mail to inform you of new services. Our policy has always been to send e-mail messages only to announce such information, and we'll continue to honor this policy. Thank you for being a Hotmail member."

    --
    -no broken link
    1. Re:This is nothing like Yahoo by letxa2000 · · Score: 2
      Who cares that they knew about the 9/11 attacks in 1995? [2y.net]

      The link in your sig is broken, dude.

  16. Re:Good strategy. by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You fail to see the genius of this plan.

    For months they have been trying to get people to sign up with their Premium Email package which expands the mailbox to 10Mb and lasts forever (or something like that). People have not been signing up. It's simply too easy to create a brand new address when one fills up, so Microsoft then has to deal with 2 accounts (and so on and so on and so on) for each customer who has used up their allotted space.

    Enter spam. If Microsoft can make it intolerable for ordinary users (non-Premier club members) to use Hotmail because the speed in which the account fills with spam is simply too fast, then they will push away those users who are not interested in paying for the service. Or they will attract the payers by making it intolerable to use the service otherwise.

    Bottom line: They reduce the total traffic on their site by sloughing off the leeches (including yours truly), and increase revenue at the same time.

    The idea is brilliant.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  17. The affects Passport, not Hotmail per se by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2
    Hotmail is the gateway by which they engage you in the Passport service. These options appear to allow MS to forward your info to other pariticipating Passport sites.

    Same diff, Microsoft is sending your email address places you probably don't want it going, but users should be aware that this is probably pervasive in any Passport service they use, such as MSN messenger (may want to go and check the options on it if you use it).

  18. Passport profile by MiTEG · · Score: 2
    I logged into my Hotmail account to fix this, and it made me reenter my password. Apparently I have a MS Passport profile. I don't want one, and I never asked to have one. I wonder about the legality of this...

    Kinda reminds me of a MS developer mailing list I accidently got subscribed to. I tried to unsubscribe, but to do that I needed a passport profile. So in order to stop getting one anoying mailing list I would have had to give away my info which would be freely distributed among all the marketing companies sleeping with Microsoft.

    --
    The future isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:Passport profile by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Kinda reminds me of a MS developer mailing list I accidently got subscribed to. I tried to unsubscribe

      Easy solution: set up an out of office message for that list. Every message from the list gets quoted and sent back to the list with some tag like 'Hey look! I don't know how to use my mail client!'. You'll be unsubscribed within the day.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Passport profile by os2fan · · Score: 2
      Some news groups are have opt-in mailing lists, and you need to give a real mail addy to get in the group. jpsoft-support is an example.

      So if you forget to uncheck "mail me news", you're in the mail-list. In JPSoft's case, you can go back in and uncheck the box.

      --
      OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
    3. Re:Passport profile by gnovos · · Score: 2

      Unless it happens to be the "dc-stuff" mailing list (Have some fun, mail to majordomo@dis.org), in which case you'll find that your account has been deleted by your ISP, your IP addresses will all entered into the "Do Not Remove" section of the RBL, your credit cards will all mysteriously get canceled, but not before they were used to buy hammers mail-order from NASA at $9,000 a pop, and you'll STILL somehow recieve messages from the list...

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
  19. Re:Alternatives? by digitalpeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You know what, if google had web mail I'd almost pay to use it over something like hotmail. Google stands out in my opinion, not just becaue they have quality service, but they also have respectable business ethics.

    Notice that I said "respectable."

  20. Actually this is good news... by 3seas · · Score: 2

    Without MS constantly figuring out ways to make people pissed at them, GNU user base might not be growing so fast.

    I know stuff like this only solidifies a conviction to non-MS computer base...someday it'll be hard as diamonds.

  21. Microsoft-Slashdot by mmThe1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Phew...looks to me like yet another Microsoft-Slashdot contract ("conspiracy") to bring loads of traffic to Hotmail site...

    P.S. The options with "Share my other registration information" has this text:
    "This information, which is stored in your Microsoft® .NET Passport and required for registration at many Web sites, includes:

    Birth Date
    Country/Region
    State/Territory
    Gender
    Acc essibility
    Time Zone
    Occupation
    "

    This means that whatever fake information I put in Hotmail would be used for all other sites? No Way!

    1. Re:Microsoft-Slashdot by Malcontent · · Score: 2

      Eventually you will fill out a form which asks you for a credit card number, name, address, and phone number. At that point that information will be stored on some partner of Microsoft and will find it's way to every partner of MS. If you think that "fake information" will protect you then I have a bridge I want to sell.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  22. Re:'s odd.... by pacman+on+prozac · · Score: 2, Funny

    ooops sorry...that was the " MSN® Hotmail® Tip of the Month" in one particular email (from msn)

    full text:

    MSN® Hotmail® Tip of the Month

    Be aggressive against spam
    At Hotmail, we know spam is a chronic problem, and we are doing everything we can to help you keep spam out of your Inbox. That's why we developed the Junk Mail Filter. But there are other things you can do to decrease the amount of spam you receive.

    Never respond to junk mail or follow an "unsubscribe" link, since this will only confirm that the spammers have a live address. Also, do not use your e-mail address when participating in chat rooms. Finally, you should carefully review a Web site's privacy policy when performing online activities such as shopping and banking, to ensure that your e-mail address will not be shared with a third party. Keep in mind that MSN does not sell, rent or lease its customer lists to third parties.

    Still, I guess this was yesterday...

  23. Re:Notice by HalB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That works great if it is just an email service. However, if you are using a say, telecom service (you get a T1 or DSL to your house) you have to give your phone number and address, or they will install it at the wrong place. 8') Next, Verizon posts your personal HOME address and telephone number in the WHOIS database for any spambot to pick out (rather than use the P.O. Box you gave for your billing address).
    Sometimes you have to give out your address. Or maybe you called a toll free number - guess what, your phone number is in the database.
    In the case of a monopoly like Verizon, you're stuck. But there are other cases where you have a choice.

  24. Do you uh, Yahoo? by DeadBugs · · Score: 2

    We all knowYahoo did this a little while back, and AOL did it before that. And how do we know?, well they told us. The fact that Hotmail did it without notification is typical of their business style. I only wonder how many other services (Earthlink, AT&T, etc.) either don't offer an opt out option or reset your preferences unknown to you anyways. As always you get what you pay for.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  25. Always assume the worst by gelfling · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a safe bet that no matter what the vendor says, they will pimp out whatever they can for money. They will lie and cheat and then lie and cheat about that.

    Either don't give them any true or useful information or don't give them any information at all. Leave footprints like misspelling your own name in a very unique way. Track it and complain complain complain when you find them out. cc a copy of your complaint to your state attorney general's office.

  26. Holy cow... by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 2

    Did everyone just log onto their Hotmail accounts at once or what? All of a sudden I'm getting the not-so-unfamiliar "Hotmail Account Temporarily Unavailable" screen. YOU SLASHDOTTED HOTMAIL! YOU BASTARDS!

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  27. Not true for me by donutello · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just checked my hotmail options and those three boxes were NOT checked. So I have no idea what the hell the article writer is talking about or what's different between his case and mine.

    Of course, this post will probably get buried under the avalanche of people who want to believe the article.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  28. The Actual text by donutello · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can speed registration and get personalized services at participating sites by sharing your .NET Passport information with them when you sign in.

    Choose how much of your .NET Passport information Microsoft can share with other companies' .NET Passport sites at sign-in:

    _ Share my e-mail address.
    _ Share my first and last names.
    _ Share my other registration information.

    Tell me more about .NET Passport, privacy, and security.


    FWIW, when I checked my user profile, all three of the options were unchecked.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
    1. Re:The Actual text by seldolivaw · · Score: 2

      1st and 3rd options were *checked*, for me, and I'm the 3 times consecutive winner of the "Most paranoid about giving away personal info" award.

      Bastards!

    2. Re:The Actual text by chrisvr · · Score: 2

      1st and 3rd for me as well, on an account I set up about 4 or 5 years ago, very rarely use and is currently not collecting any significant spam. (1-5 spam per week, compared to my Yahoo account, which I also don't really use, which must get about 5-10 per day.) It'll be interesting to see if my spam level increases.

    3. Re:The Actual text by kryzx · · Score: 2
      Also all unchecked for me. Longstanding account (~4 yrs) that collects beaucoup de spam.

      I've never used any other passport services, only hotmail. I wonder if that has anything to do with it.

      --
      "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
  29. oh this is beautiful by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Microsoft® .NET Passport was temporarily unable to complete your request. Please try again "

    Well i guess their servers are too busy selling my information right now.

    I should try later.

  30. Is anyone getting this? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
    OK, I logged in to my "spam-reception" Hotmail account and got this:

    We apologize, but your account is temporarily unavailable. This delay does not affect the entire site or relate specifically to your account, but the machine that holds your account information is temporarily unavailable. We do not expect this delay to last much longer, so please continue to check our site for your account status. We will do our best to make your account available as quickly as possible. We appreciate your support, and sincerely apologize for the inconvenience.
    Wow. Really a great ad for Microsoft technology. I can't wait for the day all Passport and .NET transactions will be based on this great system. I feel reassured they "will do their best" to fix this.
  31. Re:Hotmail became unsuable long ago by Cowculator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just stopped checking my old Hotmail address regularly within the past month, then at all this week, because I was sick of all the spam I had to keep deleting (a quick login showed 87 in the last 4 days, and that's without having given out this address to anyone in years) and because my school address was in general much more reliable. I also got mine before M$ bought the company, and I distinctly remember them promising when they bought it that they would always keep Hotmail a free service.

    Now, I'm not saying Hotmail isn't free anymore, because I've never paid a cent for it. But here's what they've done to allow that:

    • Spam its users regularly about how they can get better service for $19.95.
    • Replace the old policy of warning you when your account was full and eventually deleting older messages with a new policy of freezing all incoming and outgoing mail without notification as soon as you hit 2 MB if you don't pay.
    • Give away users' email addresses to virtually anyone who asks for them.

    Given these steps, which have occurred at fairly regular intervals, does it surprise you at all that they've progressed on to this? I can only imagine that next they'll replace those check boxes with bulleted lists, so that you can't opt out unless you become a paid subscriber... My advice to you is to change your name and address info immediately to something fake, clear out your Hotmail address book (because they're probably selling that too), and then to switch to a more reliable email provider. There are plenty of services that actively guard you against spam, so it shouldn't be too hard to find one you like.

  32. Other things I love about hotmail by gregfortune · · Score: 5, Informative

    • Account sizes started at 10 MB. Hotmail recently reduced them to 2 MB.
    • Hotmail constantly sends me reminders that I can get my 10MB of storage back by paying them a monthly fee. Great...
    • Those same reminders generally come as part of a message that says, in effect, "Your account is almost full. We'll send you another message to add to the total so you fill up even faster. By doing this, we can clearly demonstrate why you need a larger account. Pay us now.
    • I can get 500 messages from a single address with an identical subject and message body. Fun, now my account fills up even faster. (I sent suggestions on how to prevent this. The information was supposedly passed along to the dev team. Who knows...)
    • I can sign up for a new account and within hours, I'm receiving spam. Dang, now that's some added value, not to mention adding to the need for more storage.
    • Obvious bulk mail goes into my junk folder. Nice, except that my junk folder contributes to my total space used and isn't purged automagically if more space is needed. There isn't even an option to do this. (Sigh, I need more space again. Maybe they'll send me another advert so I can sign up..)
    • And more and more of my favorite things about hotmail. Isn't it just nifty?
    arg!!!!
    1. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

      also some emails just wont be junked even if you set them up to be. i think some domain names are unjunkable.

    2. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by donutello · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Obvious bulk mail goes into my junk folder. Nice, except that my junk folder contributes to my total space used and isn't purged automagically if more space is needed. There isn't even an option to do this. (Sigh, I need more space again. Maybe they'll send me another advert so I can sign up..)


      Go to Options --> Junk mail deletion and you can choose to send it to /dev/null without it ever counting against your quota.

      But seriously, I don't see why anyone should need more than 2Mb of space in a free email account. I use free email accounts only when I don't trust the person I'm giving the address to to not spam me (but when I need to give an email address to get a confirmation code, etc.)

      My hotmail account has almost never been over 1Mb. If you're using it to store important email, you should either look into downloading your email using a POP3 client or seriously consider getting a real email provider.

      \end{rant}

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    3. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by os2fan · · Score: 2
      Here's some of mine:

      If you get a .txt or .gif attachment, there is no way to save it. It opens the file in another window, and does not allow you to save it.

      BTW, I'm using hotmail until I decide to settle with an internet provider, or get my own address. I have three, one a sleeper. All get nice solid amounts of spam.

      Even so, all are marked "female", and all get spam on "how to make your penis 3 inches longer" or "hot horney chicks".

      --
      OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
    4. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by quantaman · · Score: 2

      I actually havn't gotten spam in either my personal mail account (based out of a university) or hotmail/for all the sheep who use MSN/address I give to people who I think might spam me! The closest thing I've gotten to spam is the hotmail staff constantly bugging me, and I can't block them!!! ":-(

      --
      I stole this Sig
    5. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by Mnemia · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I scrapped Hotmail a long time ago, the second that MS took over. Are there ANY decent webmail sites left out there anymore that don't charge for basic services like automatic forwarding? I'm just not going to pay for a webmail account that I only use as a disposable intermediary between all the info-greedy sites out there and my real account...

    6. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by ktakki · · Score: 2

      On top of this, I've found that Hotmail is broken in that any outgoing message over 16K of text hangs /cgi-bin/premail/xxxx and times out after five minutes.

      Never did this when the site ran BSD. Ever.

      Big win for Microsoft. Woo hoo.

      k.

      --
      "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    7. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by mlk · · Score: 2

      The follow have served me well:
      http://www.gmx.co.uk
      No email forwarding with out paying, but then it has pop & smtp
      http://sneakemail.com
      Free emailforward designed to help remove spam.
      I can a spam mail to the address, all I have to do it delete it, and set up a new one.

      Mlk

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    8. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by gregfortune · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nope, I just get a kick out of all of the offers for free porn and huge home mortgages on my apartment ;o)

    9. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by gregfortune · · Score: 2

      Dang, I've been using that account too long ;o) Although I'm pretty sure they changed to the 2MB cap in the last year and half. Perhaps it was only 5MB before, but it was certainly larger than 2...

    10. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2

      Try Gotmail, the hotmail downloading/forwarding perl script, or pop3hot a shareware ($18) proggie that bridges pop3 to hotmail accounts.

    11. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by jedrek · · Score: 2

      I can sign up for a new account and within hours, I'm receiving spam. Dang, now that's some added value, not to mention adding to the need for more storage.

      That's what I always thought about Hotmail until I signed up and got... Zero (0) pieces of spam (sans the M$/MSN shit they send me) over the next 4 weeks.

    12. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by RussGarrett · · Score: 2

      mail.ru

      Includes POP access for free, and a much nicer webmail interface than hotmail. Don't slashdot it too much, I'd like it to remain free. Please ;).

    13. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by Akumapwr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Use www.gmx.net, I get no spam. It's free, it's 10mb and has way more options.

    14. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by grytpype · · Score: 2

      > I can sign up for a new account and within hours, I'm receiving spam.

      I'm trying an experiment right now... I created a hotmail account with a totally unguessable, random username. It hasn't gotten spammed yet, and it's been a couple of days.

      So maybe Microshaft isn't selling new names to spammers? That sounds like something they WOULD do, of course. But another explanation is that spammers are constructing email addresses, taking usernames from other addresses and adding hotmail.com, yahoo.com, etc.

      --

      - Have a picture

    15. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by peddrenth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are there ANY decent webmail sites left out there anymore that don't charge for basic services like automatic forwarding?

      ...and how easy is it to set one up for those of us who own our own domain?

      I've given out a couple of email addresses on my domain to family, but there's still no way they can configure passwords on their own. I saw a package which lets you run a yahoo-like web email service (skinnable interface, optional POP collection, etc) but that's £500 (and obviously I can't run it on a size-limited hosted webserver)

      Plenty of us have got domains we can use, the question is whether it's possible (or easy) to use them for limited web-based email accounts.

    16. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by leuk_he · · Score: 2

      I can sign up for a new account and within hours, I'm receiving spam. Dang, now that's some added value, not to mention adding to the need for more storage.

      You just have to examine all the flags that are there. Make sure that any options that might show your email in a directory are off.

      I have a OLD hotmail account that only receives 1 spam message per week, and a relative new account that only receives the Hotmail/MSN offers. Just do not use "JoeSmith@hotmail.com" but use "Joe_Smith_21@hotmail.com". I do have a throwaway OLD mail that one had "list in xxx directory checked that still has 100 new emails ..enlarge your penis.. when i log in.

    17. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by chrisvr · · Score: 2

      I'd agree with that. I don't use my Hotmail account much (set it up so I could check POP mail while at work.) My address is kind of random, certainly not one you'd find by going through a dictionary search. I get maybe 1 or 2 pieces of spam per week, tops.

      I contrast this to my main email account which is my name@my domain.com, and I get a ton of mail with cc:s to tons of other domains with my name before the @.

      I think this must be the way spammers are going at it these days. Also we had a catchall account for whatever@ourdomainname.com, and we have been getting a lot of mails lately to randomshit@mail.ourdomainname.com. The spammers are either getting much smarter, or, worse, they've converted some real geeks who actually know what they are doing over to the dark side.

      Thank TPTB for server side filters, which we plan to beef up this weekend.

    18. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by Nurlman · · Score: 2
      > The closest thing I've gotten to spam is the hotmail staff constantly bugging me, and I can't block them!!!

      Sure you can. Sorta. In your custom filters, filter anything with the "From Name" of "Hotmail" into your junk folder. (You may even be able to filter it into the trash-- I've never tried.)

      Voila! The annual missive from "Hotmail Member Services" never darkens your inbox again. And there's a very low risk of false positives.

    19. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by zerocool^ · · Score: 2

      Buy a domain and run webmin/usermin on the domain - web based email (plus a buncha other crap) via open source software.

      --
      sig?
    20. Re:Other things I love about hotmail by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      Check out IMP. Works pretty nice. Watch out for the Debian packages, I've had them obliterate my MySQL user/pword databases, but that's the maintainer's fault. Nice packages. Needs IMAP. Very good.

      --Dan

  33. Re:Alternatives? by Kris_J · · Score: 2
    www.playstation.com.au will give you a free address, and I'll bet that Sony will never spam you or sell your account details to their partners. (HA)

    Why don't you just spend US$12 a year (or whatever) and buy a Spamcop account. POP3, Webmail, forwarding, anti-virus and anti-spam. I still use my account there even though I've dropped my spam-magnet of an account at Yahoo and started masking my address using Sneakemail.

  34. Today's star feature: personal information sharing by eracerblue · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...now that's innovation...

    ...Microsoft® Innovation (TM)

  35. Riddle me this... (3 of 4 accounts affected) by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 3, Informative


    OK, I've got four HotMail accounts. For the first three, the options had been changed and I reset them to opt-out. When I got to the fourth account, which I set up about three weeks ago and have NEVER sent a message from, my options indicated that none of my info was to be public. However, there were 171 SPAMs waiting for me, starting just a few hours after the "Welcome to HotMail" message. Apparently, they released my new e-mail address to the wild the instant it was created, making any decision of mine to opt-out a moot point. Once it's out there, you're screwed.

    1. Re:Riddle me this... (3 of 4 accounts affected) by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 2

      There is also the chance that you picked up an email address that had formerly belonged to another user, who wasn't very protective of his email address. As such, he sent his email address (that is, YOUR email address) all in the wild, then let his account expire, and you picked it up. Now you have to deal with his spam. While I'm not really proud of Microsoft or Hotmail, I don't think they 'sell' their email lists to every spammer who wants them. Certainly not 171 in one week.

      The reason I came up with this theory is because I have two Hotmail accounts. One consists of letters and numbers, while another was a word I made up. The made up word has yet to receive any unsolicited emailings (Microsoft sends one every other week or so, but that's acceptable, because its basically a newsletter for the service that I'm currently using). The other...well, it gets about 10 emails an hour. And the other is the newer email address.

    2. Re:Riddle me this... (3 of 4 accounts affected) by cqnn · · Score: 2

      Hotmail is considered such an easy target I'd
      bet someone created/generated a list of possible
      email addresses from a@hotmail.com to
      zzzzzzzzzz@hotmail.com long ago.

      Send out "test spam" in batches to validate
      each possible account, and you essentially create
      a brute force spam list generator.

      Either that, or hotmail still allows some wildcard exploits to work.

    3. Re:Riddle me this... (3 of 4 accounts affected) by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 2

      I think you have a very good theory. The name of the account is based on a Star Trek character's name. I was surprised that it wasn't taken already.

  36. !There is another explaination! by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So much for Microsoft and its smarts. Either the policy is wrong or Microsoft was wrong to pre-check the boxes to share information -- both cannot be right.
    As a database programmer I know it's totally possible for checkboxes to display information contrary to what the real database has stored. Imagine that a given field is supposed to contain the values 0 or 1. 0 means no and 1 means yes. It's quite possible for a NULL value on a new field to be rendered as yes, even though nothing has been decided yet. If X == 0 then no else yes. There.
    1. Re:!There is another explaination! by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      Unless they're really weird there is no reason to store a NULL (most used to represent missing or unknown information) on a bi-state tick box which they know the answer to as all users have been through that screen at some point.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    2. Re:!There is another explaination! by Kris_J · · Score: 2

      Uh, NEW field. Are we talking about the same thing?

    3. Re:!There is another explaination! by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      I'm not saying it isn't easy to get, I'm saying it's easy to overlook. New fields are a pain to populate and coders are always forced into making one assumption or another. The end result can be that while the underlying database contains correct information (or information that isn't incorrect) the way it's actually rendered to the browser may not properly represent the data, especially if it contains something unexpected (or nothing, if nothing is unexpect).

      I'm sure everyone on /. can come up with a million ways of getting it right, but there are a million times more of getting it wrong and the checkbox you're seeing on the screen is not directly connected to the database -- there isn't a little picture of a checked box sitting in it.

    4. Re:!There is another explaination! by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      Why not X == 1 then yes else no. There.
      Then they wouldn't have everybody suddenly "opting in". Microsoft must be getting desperate to drum up revenue;)

    5. Re:!There is another explaination! by tb3 · · Score: 2

      But any DBA with half-a-brain with create this new field as NOT-NULL default value 0. Come on.

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    6. Re:!There is another explaination! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      As an HTML and ASP/JSP developer I know it would be extremely dumb if this is how the dynamic form is being encoded.

      (assuming the lameness filter doesn't prevent me) which code is more elegant?

      checked>Sign me up!

      or

      checked>Sign me up!

  37. DoS: Everyone sign up for a dozen hotmail accounts by Mongoose · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Everyone sign up for a dozen hotmail accounts and effectively posion they're market data. If companies find out 50% of the email addresses on hotmail.com are false then they'll pay MS less money to host _more_ addresses.

    I hate to be the one to call for this, however it's just as legal as what they're doing. It's no the moral thing to do but it is legal. It's time to do something all you little /. trolls.

  38. Use Hotmail as a Spam Trap by fiver-hoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have on old hotmail account that gets 100+ pieces of spam a day, and I no longer recieve any personal email to that account. What I've done, is I use Gotmail to download all the email, then pipe it to Razor. I do this every day from a cron job. If every slashdot user set up a hotmail account with a phony name, and ALLOWED the spam to come by not changing thier preferences, this would be a pretty good way to keep Razor, or whatever other spam reporting service you are using current.

    I say bring em' on! I'm happy to waste MS's bandwith, and glad to help keep the spam databases current, so those of us running Spamassassin can keep our real email accounts clean.

  39. Why use Hotmail anyway? by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why are people still using Hotmail?

    It's got to be the worst free email service on the Net when it comes to reliability, security, spam and superfluous fluff associated with your mail.

    When I discovered how much simpler and cleaner YahooMail was I ditched my HotMail account and never regretted it for a moment.

    Okay, Yahoo may still change your marketing preferences, but at least they had the decency to let you know about it and give you a chance to reverse the changes before adding you to a long list of lists.

    However, the best thing of all about YahooMail is that I get an incredibly small amount of spam arriving in my yahoomail email box.

    Either their spam filtering is far more effective, or spammers consider Hotmail user to be dumber (and therefore more likely to believe that you can earn $50,000 a month stuffing envelopes).

    I also get a 6MB mailbox for free (perhaps because I was an early adopter -- I don't think they're quite as generous for new signups) and the service seems very reliable.

    With my Javascript turned off I don't even see the pop-up ads that can be such a PITA when browsing Yahoo's properties.

    Yahoo may be far from perfect but it's a whole lot better than Hotmail that's an absolute undeniable fact.

    1. Re:Why use Hotmail anyway? by juju2112 · · Score: 2

      Of course, the default login for Yahoo uses http rather than https. It's pretty darned annoying to HAVE to click 'secure' in order to not have your password broadcast all over the world.

    2. Re:Why use Hotmail anyway? by peddrenth · · Score: 2

      "Why are people still using Hotmail?"

      Too true! I blocked access to my account from hotmail (or forged hotmail) addresses for a long time. I was absolutely shocked to find some of my friends in the "deleted_spam" folder, not because I'd deleted their emails, but that they were actually using hotmail!

    3. Re:Why use Hotmail anyway? by chrisvr · · Score: 2

      I gotta disagree here. I get WAY more spam on my Yahoo account (5-10 per day) than I do on my Hotmail account, and I don't really use either for anything at all. I have throwaway addresses at my domain that I use for web regs, etc., so I'm not really giving out those addresses for much at all any more. So who knows where the spammers are getting my address from? I guess my address at Yahoo is a bit more guessable than my address at Hotmail, but not that much more so. I can only guess that Yahoo is selling my address, although I have always opted out where they let me.

      When I was working at a place where I couldn't check my POP mail, I configured both my Hotmail and my Yahoo accounts to check POP mail. Yahoo consistently did a horrible job of it, always re-retrieving the same mails. I haven't used either for that finction in about a year or so, so don't know how bad/good they are now.

      But now you can't check POP mail through Yahoo without paying extra. Screw that.

      But you know, I don't spend a lot of time raging and complaining about any of it. It's free. You get what you pay for.

    4. Re:Why use Hotmail anyway? by blair1q · · Score: 2

      I opened a hotmail account, and opted out of all forms of spam.

      But Microsoft itself sent me spam.

      So I complained. They said to try opting-out again. I did. It happened again. They said to try blocking the sending address (staff@hotmail.com, iirc). I did. It happened again.

      Then I realized: it wasn't an email, at least not a normal one. The "Reply-To" buttons were disabled. They were placing this advertisement in my inbox rather than mailing it to me. They went around all forms of filtering and blocking to do it.

      I complained, got a boilerplate answer telling me to try blocking, and complained again, and got another boilerplate answer telling me to try blocking.

      Then I stopped logging in. I'd never used the account for anything other than correspondence with MSN staff about the problem. Now I can't log in. Must've expired so hard it won't even let me in to sell me resubscription. Good. But I have no illusion that it means they didn't save my name to sell to direct-mail morons.

      Good thing I didn't use a real address or phone number.

      --Blair

  40. ...Continue Using Hotmail... by thomis · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ...That's the value of the button on the Browser Limitations page when I log in... My browser reports the user agent as Space Bison. I'm actually using IE 6, but my proxy [proxomitron] reports whatever I want, though that's the default. I had no problem updating my |options|personal profile. If the page is actually detecting my browser by sniffing DOM objects and specially allowing me, I'd be surprised, but if you MOZ/Konq/Opera users are actually blocked from updating that would really suck. The whole trick sucks, but M$ isn't the first (yahoo betrayed me some time ago). My demographic info is probably all over the place, but in both cases they've only managed to poison their databases. All the info I gave them was spoofed, except for the hotmail address, which I mainly use as a spam-sink anyway.
    So, I guess that's my moral to the story... don't just use these services... USE them. Everyone that asks for your demographic info is giving you the opportunity to make ALL of that database less valid and less useful. This really is an opportunity.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un 'sig'
  41. They Changed my State and Zip, Too! by Le+Marteau · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I moved not long ago and never changed my profile. But my profile now shows my new state and zip! My GF's Hotmail account profile was changed likewise, and she never changed her profile, too!

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
  42. I wonder if the MS web site accepts Space Bison? by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Informative


    Proxomitron, the ad blocker software, can identify any browser you have as anything you like. The default is Space Bison. (Unfortunately, I don't think there is a Linux version.)

  43. Tried a few with Opera by josquint · · Score: 4, Informative

    Identify as Opera: dont work
    Identify as Mozilla 5.0: dont work
    Identify as Mozilla 4.76: Works
    Identify as Mozilla 3.0: dont work
    Identify as MSIE 5.0: Works(duh!)

    Yet, in Opera, all the pages are rendered the same way, and all pages in hotmail work fine in Opera assuming you identify it as a 'preferred browser'. So, its not a functionality issue, just a "use our damn browser or else" issue. A DDoS attack from MSN to non-IE users? hehe

    1. Re:Tried a few with Opera by bluGill · · Score: 2

      I suspect Opera has a valid anti-monopoly law-suit against microsoft. A monopoly cannot lock out compititors, and microsoft has already been found a monopoly for purposed of browsers, so this is a strong case.

      Too bad I'm not a lawyer. I'd like to see the compnay persue this angle though. (lynx and mozilla should too, and perhaps kde and whoever else makes a web browser)

  44. It's really about MS Passport by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had to change my Opera identity to get it to let me in. Looks like one of those ad hoc "version check" things that makes presumptions about the capabilities of your browser.

    Having said this, this has more to do with Microsoft Passport than Microsoft. I've actually been evaluating Passport as an optional authentication method on a current project, and one of the features that it offers is that upon authentication partners can get the basic user information (such as what they state on their site when you look at what "other registration info lists") for the purpose of making it easier for the user to complete orders, etc. It's unfortunate that they hijacked Hotmail to begin this, and the preference should start and not (perhaps even terminating your account if you refuse to allow it, but certainly not automatically doing it), however that's the whole purpose of Passport : To give users one username and password, and to allow them an easier experience on the net. You can see the details at http://www.microsoft.com/myservices/passport/overv iew.asp. The same sort of idea is going to hold true with the Liberty Alliance system as well.

  45. People don't trust Microsoft... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...because of some stupid little thing like this?

    Not because Windows XP forces you to call Microsoft to "register" it if you buy a new motherboard?

    Not because Outlook and Outlook Express open attachments and install viruses, worms, and trojans FOR you?

    Not because Microsoft voids your software's license because you "installed it too many times"?

    Not because Media Player was shipped with spyware in it?

    Not because Microsoft is forcing ridiculous licensing schemes onto educational institutions?

    Not because Microsoft treats their users like babies and thinks that they know better than you what you want to do with your computer?

    Not because they got rid of Clippy from MS Office?

    Not because they bullied OEMs to install ONLY Microsoft operating environments?

    Good grief... If THIS is what it takes to drive people over the edge, they shoulda went with writing a new "we 0wNz your house, car, wife, and kids" clause in their EULA.

    1. Re:People don't trust Microsoft... by alizard · · Score: 2

      Sounds like you haven't read any of their current product EULAs lately.

  46. Shouldn't that be.... by Restil · · Score: 5, Funny

    (If you're a user, login, go to Options > Personal Profile, and un-check the boxes at the bottom of that page.)

    Shouldn't that read something like...

    "If you're a user, then the preference to change is your email provider."

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  47. Re:I tried to update my profile and... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

    piANALto

    Hotmail doesn't like Anal :P!

    Wierd considering they want to fuck all their users up the butt....

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  48. in which I attempt to delete my hotmail account... by gr3y · · Score: 5, Informative

    I obfuscated the names because I have nothing against the people who responded (or didn't respond, depending on your point of view) to my request. Their replies were slightly mechanistic, and it is clear (to me, yvmv) that Microsoft has no intention of giving up the information I provided to open my hotmail account. But I planned for this day, so any junk mail Microsoft may have signed "me" up for, using the name and address I generously provided, is being forwarded to the dead letters office in Leesville, Louisiana. Yeeha.

    This latest move comes as no surprise, really. I can't imagine Redmond respects my privacy any more than Yahoo!, Egghead, or any one of a dozen other defunct dot coms...

    ===== BEGIN =====

    Excellent. That is exactly what I wanted to hear. I intend to close my account presently. I will attempt to log in to hotmail in 100 days. If that attempt succeeds, I will contact you then.

    From: "Microsoft .NET Passport Support"
    To:
    Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: CST60498798ID - delete my account
    Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 20:23:03 -0800

    Hello mephistopheles51@hotmail.com,
    Thank you for writing to Microsoft .NET Passport.
    In response to your inquiry, I would just like to reiterate that your Hotmail account is an automatic Passport account as well. Therefore, if you close your Hotmail account, your Passport account will also be cancelled.
    I hope I was able to help you.
    Thank you for your patience.

    Sincerely,
    Pi.
    Microsoft .NET Passport Customer Support Representative

    --- Original Message ---
    From: mephistopheles51@hotmail.com
    To: "Microsoft .NET Passport Support"
    Sent: Tue Feb 26 19:40:25 PST 2002
    Subject: RE: RE: RE: CST60498798ID - delete my account

    Finally, someone actually *read* my question. After receiving the exact same response twice in a row I was becoming concerned that there was no human being on the other end of the computer at all, but a machine, which was parsing the question and appending the appropriate "solution". To rephrase your reply: if I close my hotmail account, and DO NOT USE MY PASSPORT FOR 90 DAYS, all information provided to or collected by Microsoft will be automatically deleted, including any information provided to marketers, advertisers, or any of Microsoft's "partners". If you respond affirmatively, I will close my hotmail account and expect that the non-public information provided to Microsoft by me will be deleted as above, following 90 days of inactivity. If you must respond negatively, please forward my question to someone who will guarantee that the non-public information provided to Microsoft by me will be deleted as above, or who will state, for the record, that it simply cannot (or will not) be done prior to responding. I should like a name in the latter case. In either case, if I have not heard from a representative of hotmail or passport in three days, I will take this matter up again. I eagerly await your reply.

    Thank you.

    >From: "Microsoft .NET Passport Support"
    >To:
    >Subject: RE: RE: RE: CST60498798ID - delete my account
    >Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 23:02:00 -0800
    >
    >Hello Mephistopheles51,
    > Thank you for writing to Microsoft .NET Passport.
    > Regarding your inquiry, Email services of Hotmail Passport IDs are
    >automatically deactivated after 30 days of inactivity. After such time,
    >your Hotmail Passport will cease to be an email account but you can still
    >continue using the ID on other Participating Passport sites.
    > Should you wish to have your Passport ID purged from our system, please
    >refrain from accessing the account for 90 days. Accounts are automatically
    >removed from our system only after the specified period of inactivity.
    > I hope I was able to answer your question, if you have other inquiries,
    >please do not hesitate to write us back.
    >
    >
    >
    >Sincerely,
    >
    >
    >Je.
    >Microsoft .NET Passport Customer Support Representative
    >

    >--- Original Message ---
    >From: mephistopheles51@hotmail.com
    >To: "Microsoft .NET Passport Support"
    >Sent: Mon Feb 25 19:00:23 PST 2002
    >Subject: RE: RE: CST60498798ID - delete my account
    >
    >I'm afraid you don't understand, as previously explained.
    > I want to delete my "passport", thereby deleting all information provided to
    >or collected by Microsoft, and not just my hotmail account. As indicated by
    >the recent memorandum from Bill Gates, it appears Microsoft has finally
    >realized that it must earn users' trust. This is a step in the right
    >direction. Users are not a cash machine for any corporation that decides to
    >abuse its monopoly status for the benefit of the marketing and advertising
    >departments of its many "partners".
    > However, the recent attacks on hotmail, and the vulnerabilities in
    >Microsoft's ".net" and "passport" services have convinced me that none of
    >the information I provided to Microsoft is truly secure, not even my name,
    >address, or IP, and that Microsoft cannot be trusted not to use the
    >information provided or collected for its own gain, and to my detriment.
    >Therefore, I would like to delete all information I provided to Microsoft,
    >or which has been collected by Microsoft about me, in its entirety.
    > Please tell me how to do that, or direct my inquiry to someone who can.
    >Merely deleting my hotmail account simply will not suffice. Thank you.

    > >From: "Microsoft .NET Passport Support"
    > >To:
    > >Subject: RE: RE: CST60498798ID - delete my account
    > >Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:21:11 -0800
    > >
    > >Hello Mephistopheles51,
    > >
    > >
    > >Thank you for writing back to Microsoft .NET Passport.
    > >
    > >With regard to your concern, please be guided on the procedures of deleting
    > >your mephistopheles51@hotmail.com account.
    > >
    > > >>> To close your Hotmail account
    > >
    > >1. In the upper right corner of any Hotmail page, click "Help".
    > >
    > >2. In the MSN Hotmail Help window, click "Find", type "Close account", and
    > >then click "Go".
    > >
    > >3. In the search results, click the "Close your Hotmail account" link. 4.
    > >Follow the instructions to close your account.
    > >
    > >You can also close your Hotmail account by not signing in to the account
    > >for 30 days or within the first 10 days after you set up your account.
    > >Hotmail then marks your account as "Inactive", your stored messages are
    > >permanently deleted, and inbound messages are returned to the sender. You
    > >can reactivate your account by going to the sign-in page and typing your
    > >sign-in name and password. If your account remains "Inactive" for 90 days,
    > >Hotmail permanently deletes it. You cannot reactivate your deleted account
    > >because it has been completely removed from our system. You must register
    > >for a new one.
    > >
    > >Note: If you want to permanently close your Hotmail account, do not sign in
    > >to Hotmail or any other .NET Passport site (such as Messenger or eShop) for
    > >which you use your user@hotmail.com .NET Passport for a full 90 days. In
    > >addition, if your Hotmail account is closed, your hotmail.com .NET Passport
    > >is also closed.
    > > Microsoft .NET Passport has comprehensive online help available to you.
    > >For more information about Microsoft .NET Passport or help with Microsoft
    > >.NET Passport features, click the Help link on a Microsoft .NET Passport
    > >web page. When the help window opens, click the appropriate topic, or click
    > >the All Topics link at the top of the help window for a categorized list of
    > >all Microsoft .NET Passport help topics.
    > >
    > >Thank you for using Microsoft .NET Passport. If you have further questions,
    > >please reply to this e-mail message.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >Sincerely,
    > >
    > >Lo.
    > >Microsoft .NET Passport Customer Support Representative
    > >

    > >--- Original Message ---
    > >From: mephistopheles51@hotmail.com
    > >To: "Microsoft .NET Passport Support"
    >
    > >Sent: Fri Feb 22 17:35:47 PST 2002
    > >Subject: RE: CST60498798ID - delete my account
    > >
    > >I'm afraid you don't understand. I want to delete my "passport". Microsoft
    > >simply cannot be trusted with the information I provided, and cannot be
    > >trusted not to attempt to collect more and more associative information to
    > >be sold to its marketing and advertising "partners". I do not want any
    > >information I provided to Microsoft to exist on Microsoft's servers at all.
    > > The help page simply states that I will be closing my hotmail account, and
    > >that after 90 days my hotmail account will be deleted, but that deletion of
    > >my hotmail account will not affect my passport, and that I may reactivate my
    > >hotmail account at any time within 90 days simply by signing in to hotmail.
    > >This is not acceptable.
    > > Please direct me to a link that will allow me to delete my passport, thus
    > >removing all passport information collected by Microsoft.
    > > As an aside, why do hotmail.msn.com, passport.com, and msn.com need 14
    > >cookies between them? Don't you find that a little excessive? I certainly do.
    > > Thank you!

    > > >From: "Microsoft .NET Passport Support"
    >
    > > >To:
    > > >Subject: RE: CST60498798ID - delete my account
    > > >Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:31:37 -0800
    > > >
    > > >Hello mephistopheles51,
    > > >
    > > >Thank you for writing to Microsoft .NET Passport.
    > > > In response to your concern, I have provided below the procedure on how
    > > >to delete your mephistopheles51@hotmail.com .NET Passport account.
    > > > >>> To close your Hotmail account
    > > > 1. In the upper right corner of any Hotmail page, click "Help".
    > > > 2. In the MSN Hotmail Help window, click "Find", type "Close account",
    > > >and then click "Go".
    > > > 3. In the search results, click the "Close your Hotmail account" link.
    > >4.
    > > >Follow the instructions to close your account.
    > > > You can also close your Hotmail account by not signing in to the account
    > > >for 30 days or within the first 10 days after you set up your account.
    > > >Hotmail then marks your account as "Inactive", your stored messages are
    > > >permanently deleted, and inbound messages are returned to the sender. You
    > > >can reactivate your account by going to the sign-in page and typing your
    > > >sign-in name and password. If your account remains "Inactive" for 90 days,
    > > >Hotmail permanently deletes it. You cannot reactivate your deleted account
    > > >because it has been completely removed from our system. You must register
    > > >for a new one.
    > > > Note: If you want to permanently close your Hotmail account, do not sign
    > > >in to Hotmail or any other .NET Passport site (such as Messenger or eShop)
    > > >for which you use your user@hotmail.com .NET Passport for a full 90 days.
    > > >In addition, if your Hotmail account is closed, your hotmail.com .NET
    > > >Passport is also closed.
    > > > Microsoft .NET Passport has comprehensive online help available to you.
    > > >For more information about Microsoft .NET Passport or help with Microsoft
    > > >.NET Passport features, click the Help link on a Microsoft .NET Passport
    > > >web page. When the help window opens, click the appropriate topic, or click
    > > >the All Topics link at the top of the help window for a categorized list of
    > > >all Microsoft .NET Passport help topics.
    > > >
    > > >Thank you for using Microsoft .NET Passport. If you have further questions,
    > > >please reply to this e-mail message.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >Sincerely,
    > > >
    > > >Ed.
    > > >Microsoft .NET Passport Customer Support Representative
    > > >

    > > >--- Original Message ---
    > > >From: no@alternate.com
    > > >To: "Microsoft .NET Passport Support"
    > >
    > > >Sent: Tue Feb 19 18:51:42 PST 2002
    > > >Subject: delete my account
    > > >
    > > >CustomerName : don't need don't need
    > > >UpdateCountry : false, false
    > > >CUBirthdate : don't need
    > > >BrowserVersion : don't need
    > > >OperatingSystem : don't need
    > > >ErrorMessage : n/a
    > > >Submit : Send
    > > >ContactEmailAddress : mephistopheles51@hotmail.com
    > > >Country : US
    > > >FirstName : don't need
    > > >LastName : don't need
    > > >Region : 19283
    > > >PostalCode : don't need
    > > >Comments : you don't need any of this information to delete my account
    > > >RIGHT NOW.
    > >
    > >Don't Believe the Hype!*
    > >*and it's all hype...

    --
    Slashdot is my Mercer Box.
  49. Speculation by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is totally opposed to their DESIRE to pursue 'trustworthy computing' and bail out their tarnished image.

    Those things are, however, long-term goals.

    This action means a SHORT-term cash influx.

    What I'm wondering is: could it be that Microsoft is having difficulty making payroll? X-Box is flopping, and what is the last major product release they've had? PC sales are not stellar either.

    I realise the received wisdom is that they've got more money than God, but take just a moment to consider who that information is coming from: Microsoft itself, the same people who also say 'we'll be forced to make several million different versions of Windows', and 'this video will demonstrate to the Court that...'

    Why do we suddenly believe them when they also say, 'Oh, and we have forty billion dollars. Isn't that cool?'?

    Enron looked like a hell of a deal- until reality set in. How many billions of dollars did THEY say THEY had? And I don't think there's any evidence that Enron was LESS truthful than Microsoft.

    Wouldn't it be interesting if Microsoft was secretly bankrupt?

  50. Gee... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2

    Does this mean all the BS info I fed into the hotmail account is going to be exposed? Oh no, what a pity.

    When will people learn not to trust any company that exists primarily on the internet?

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  51. Re:Good strategy. by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2

    With the amount of spam I get on my hotmail account I would rather pay to get more filters/rules than for more diskspace.

    Do I really need 8 more MB of "Add 3 inches with one little pill" in my mailbox?

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  52. It's really about disrespect and rape. by Erris · · Score: 2
    It's unfortunate that they hijacked Hotmail to begin this..

    They need some reason to explain everything they know besides that they gave themselves permision to everything on your XP inhibitied computer.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  53. I got opted in by corebreech · · Score: 2

    Now I'm trying to figure out how to cancel the service.

  54. Re:Hotmail's privacy statement is TRUSTe Approved. by corebreech · · Score: 2

    We knew TRUSTe was shit years ago, didn't we?

    I guess now there is left no doubt whatsoever.

  55. Re:Not true for me either by camusflage · · Score: 2

    I checked mine as well, and they were not checked for me either. I do, however, go out of my way to look for anything, upon signing up for any service at all, that indicates they'll do any marketing whatsoever, be it internal or external. Perhaps the author of the article and others running into it are not so attentive?

    --
    The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
  56. Hotmail, MSN vs. the Press by theolein · · Score: 2

    The author of the article asked Craig "FUD Man" Mundie about the new settings in Hotmail while he was giving a talk about "Trustworthy computing". That must count as one of the ironies of this year.

    I have to seriously thank slashdot for this info. I've been using Hotmail since 1997 when it was still very useful and had actually entered my real information there (like countless other idiots I presume) and never bothered to change them. Recently they (MSN) started to get more penetrant with their constant warnings about deleting mail if you get near the 2mb limit and now this, not so subtle attempt to sell your info.

    Well, I deleted everything there, addresses, stored mails the works, mailed everyone I knew telling them of the private mail change and urged them to change their private web mail as well. I then changed my info to some junk and mailed MSN feedback that they were now free to delete my account. I lso mailed a couple of online news sites about it to top it off.

    Not bad, Microsoft makes middle ages feudal robber barons look like pillars of enlightenment, and to boot, I now have a really nice little story to fling at people when they start praising Microsoft as a "decent" company again.

  57. Re:Alternatives? by cscx · · Score: 2

    Plus, since Novell is run by Mormons, you know they're not lying when they say they won't sell your personal info, or else they're sure to burn in Hell with eternal damnation. I did catch something in their privacy policy about two guys in black-on-white shirts and ties coming to your house and such, but I'm not too sure what that's all about.

  58. Straining the limits of analogy... by flacco · · Score: 3, Funny

    Watching Microsoft deal with "consumers" is like being an orderly in the coma ward, and walking in on the head physician while he's raping unconscious patients in their hospital beds.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  59. Wondering myself as well by theolein · · Score: 2

    Ms' little dances and tricks are making me wonder if they are indeed having some cashflow problems. They might have $40billion supposed cash but that could very possibly be the result of some fancy accounting, just like an ex energy concern was supposedly well endowed in cash until someone decied to look at the books a bit more closely.

  60. Re:Do you uh, Yahoo? Yes! Yes I do. by KFury · · Score: 2

    And, to be accurate, Yahoo didn't even do this. Yahoo opted people in to Yahoo's own internal mailings. They didn't opt people in to sharing their information with third parties, as Hotmail has done.

    Hotmail's policy change goes far further, and lets the genie out of a bottle it can't fit back in just by changing your prefs back, because once your email addy is sold, it's out there forever.

    This actually makes Yahoo look good by comparison.

  61. Excellent Services by hendridm · · Score: 2

    I don't think you necessarily need to own your own domain. There are some excellent pay for e-mail sites that support IMAP (sorry, POP sucks for me):

    -> http://www.fastmail.fm - This is my provider. Excellent features, and you can even set your MX pointer to point to them. $20/year I think for 100MB IMAP + tons of features. Totally bad-ass.

    -> http://www.mailsnare.net - I had a friend who went through these people, and although they don't support MX pointers, they seem to offer some pretty good bang for your buck. How about 100MB IMAP account for $15/year (+ setup fee)? At that price, why would anyone use Hotmail except for garbage accounts?

    FastMail.fm also offer free accounts with 10MB. I would trust them more than Microsoft. Of course, it's cheap to upgrade your account and you get tons of cool features.

  62. Not true. by hendridm · · Score: 2

    > What's the cheapest hosting you can get? $15 a month? Over a hundred a year at least.

    What planet are you from?!

    Try $15 per year .

  63. Disk drive prices also reduced by 5x :-) by billstewart · · Score: 2
    A year or two ago, 2MB of disk space cost 1 cent at Fry's*. Now that penny gets you 10MB. So why did MSHotmail change their capacity limits in the OTHER direction?

    It's true that raw disk capacity isn't their only cost :-) But CPUs keep gaining performance, and wholesale internet bandwidth keeps getting cheaper. Labor for managing the space doesn't keep getting cheaper, though there's some downward pressure given the current dot-com bust, and system management automation software should keep getting more powerful, reducing the amount of sysadmin time per Hotmail customer.

    * 20GB drive for $100 then; $100 is now about 100 GB, depending on what's on sale. (More often 60-80GB, if you don't catch a really good sale.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  64. Forward all our hotmail spam to abuse@hotmail.com by bobdole369 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey why don't we: Forward all our hotmail spam to abuse@hotmail.com? I know we'll get cut off after a few emails, but if all of slashdot does it.... Lord knows we slashdot websites left and right... We'd have to get it with outlook or OE, or for those brave hearted and determined enough to do it manually from the website: (god love em). If we all send a few emails their way, they will be punished rather well.
    Oh yeah, and subscribe abuse@hotmail.com to all the gay porn you can...

    --
    Lousy facepalm.
  65. heh, we seem to have broken passport. by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2
    Passport seems to have gone bye bye from all the people unchecking boxes:

    Connection to host registernet.passport.com is broken

    --

    Liberty.

  66. Re:You can also close your account by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They allow reacquisition of expired accounts because they know people are scared of someone getting an account with their old email address. Your email is up for grabs if you don't log in once a month. It's how they keep you logging in.

  67. Re:I wonder if the MS web site accepts Space Bison by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Works fine in wine

  68. Hotmail lost in a comparative test in Germany by dybdahl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The german consumer organization "Stifung Warentest" made a comparative test between a lot of free e-mail services. Two of them failed, one of these were Hotmail. It was actually a very good test that tested both availability, usability, licenses etc. Hotmail failed on their license agreement and security issues.

    One competitor that got a good mark was Yahoo mail.

    Dybdahl.

  69. Is this M$'s Operation Footbullet? by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Viruses, security holes and general indifference about computer security; price-gouging licensing schemes; BSA audits; FUD about open source software; and now a breach of the privacy of Hotmail users (not to mention increasingly poor service for Hotmail). And then there's the antitrust trial, with revelations of threats and retaliation against OEM's, ISP's and software vendors; arrogant definace of the DOJ and the courts; no willingness to compomise, no insight or remorse; fabricated evidence in the courtroom; and Bill Gates on his deposition video in a seething rage, rocking back and forth in his chair, playing ignorant and obstinate, claiming not to understand simple words and not to remember crucial business decisions, only to be squarely contradicted by his own email.

    When the Church of $cientology began a few years ago to confront their critics on the Internet, some of the critics began to refer to their campaign as Operation Footbullet, because the Co$ simply blundered again and again in highly public fashion. Their corruption and outright craziness became more obvious than ever before to anyone who cared to look.

    Has the Micro$oft Corporation been conducting its own Operation Footbullet? Up until about two or three years ago, much of this was ignored by the media and there was almost no awareness of their excesses in the general public. And of course many people still don't pay much attention to the software industry. But anyone who pays the least bit of attention is faced with a constant stream of reports about ruthlessness and frankly criminal behavior, a profound lack of respect for consumers and business partners, and a general stench of unethical behavior that can only be overpowered by Enron's awful stink. I suppose Enron is ahead of M$ on the scales of immorality, but nevertheless, M$ is risking going down in history as one of the greediest and most ruthless plutocrats since the the robber barons of the railroad and Standard Oil days -- and those are the ones who've held the record for over a hundred years!

    Of course, some people will respond that I'm exaggerating. I'll probably even get modded as Flamebait or Troll. And indeed, it really is hard to state the case against Micro$oft without sounding like a zealot, because the accusations are simply so hair-raising, it's hard for the uninitiated to believe that they're all true (this is, in fact, what I used to think about the Church of $cientology). Judge Jackson should not have shot his mouth off the way he did, but who could blame the man, he probably just couldn't help himself. The awful fact is that M$ is one of the most appalling corporate gangsters in all of history.

  70. It's a free service... by Otis_INF · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let me get this straight:
    - It's totally free
    - They provide a huge pile of hardware, software and people to keep up the site and datastores.
    - They don't want money in return
    - Everything but the sun costs money

    So you people think that MS is a philantropic organisation? ALWAYS ask yourself when something is 'free' and the provider of the service has to spent a lot of money to give you this service for 'free': "Where's the catch?". I find this moaning about Hotmail rather silly, if you ask me. If you don't like it, get a real ISP account. Yes that costs money, start wondering where that money's for.

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  71. Legality in the UK by Afty0r · · Score: 5, Informative

    I believe that if MS has pulled this stunt on its UK based customers, that it is liable for a £500 fine for every customer that files a complaint with the Data Protection Registrar (which if everyone did, would probably for a few hundred million sterling, or half a billion US$).

    In the UK we have an act called the 'Data Protection Act' which means any companies doing business in the UK are *obliged* to require our permission to do anything outside their company with our personal data we provide to them, and breaking these rules can be swiftly and harshly punished. In extreme cases, it can result in a business being shut down entirely.

    Other fringe benefits include the right to demand a company never contacts you again, and the right to demand to see *all* information a company holds about you, so you can correct this information if it is incorrect.

    1. Re:Legality in the UK by mixbsd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a very good point, however if Hotmail's servers are in the US or M$'s Hotmail division is not registered in the UK, then I doubt our DPA laws can touch 'em.

    2. Re:Legality in the UK by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I noticed some postings above where some people had checked their default settings and found them "unchecked" by default. One of those people had a .co.uk address.

      I wonder if they also responded truthfully to their country of origin, and MS simply didn't opt them in for this reason...

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
  72. Fake Info! by squaretorus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does ANYONE on here set up Hotmail accounts using genuine information? I thought ALL Hotmail accounts, apart maybe from those set up by grannies, were using fake details.

    How hard is it to find a zip code!

    Would you ever knowingly provide Bill with your details?

  73. Re:in which I attempt to delete my hotmail account by Professor+J+Frink · · Score: 2, Funny
    Excellent. Your post vividly depicts the true stupidity of top-posting in any medium.

    How useful it is to read the final conclusion of your email adventure before even finding out how it started. Top posters really are "Read the book backwards" sorta people, aren't they?

    --
    "Don't get mad, get a monkey!"
  74. Re:'s odd.... by jnana · · Score: 2

    Yes, but I bet they don't consider their hundreds of 'trading partners' to be third parties -- i.e., pay us a small fee, and you are no longer a third party.

  75. MigrateCookiesAcrossDomains by Shirotae · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was just logging out after turning off those options that had magically been turned on when I noticed this URL go by in the address bar

    http://msn.co.uk/webinclude/MigrateCookiesAcrossDo mains.asp

    fortunately, the system was being so slow that I had time to capture it. It looks as if the protections we are supposed to have about cookies not being sent to different domains mean nothing to Microsoft. No surprise there then.

    1. Re:MigrateCookiesAcrossDomains by Shirotae · · Score: 2

      You may have captured the URL, but you didn't bother to find out whether it was doing anything wrong, did you? My guess is the "across domains" it was referring to was between msn.com and msn.co.uk.

      What they were doing may not have been wrong from their point of view, but it goes against the spirit of some of the assurances people are given about cookies, and does that without asking for permission or giving any kind of explicit warning. Since I had just been instructing Hotmail (or was it Passport) to not pass my data around, seeing what might be the passing of data from one Passport client site to another serves to increase the already high level of distrust of Microsoft.

  76. Re:Linux not ready for prime Time by Juln · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yep, nobody cared when Yahoo did it... and Microsoft can't think of a frickin' idea on their own, so they probably copied this from Yahoo... Ha ha....

    --
    Juln
  77. Mr Individual is OK but Mr User is not! by Shirotae · · Score: 2

    I was just updating another account which I set up with the first/last name "Concerned User" a while ago (I used it to send a polite "did you know you are a spam relay" message once so chose a suitable name for the purpose). After switching off those permissions I tried to update the account only to find that "User" is no longer acceptable as a last name. For that account I am now "Concerned Individual" which apparently is OK.

    Is this a stupid policy implemented by idiots? It looks like it to me. I pity the people who use Hotmail for anything serious.

  78. Re:interesting process by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Also logged in to uncheck the flags when I heard this story.
    But now hotmail won't accept my First Name: Mads
    It said it was reserved or prohibited!? How can M$ tell me that my first name i prohibited? My first name in my hotmail-account, and in real-life has always been Mads!
    Is 'Mads' a curse-word in the english language, or what's up with that?
    Well, so I had to type in another name. 'Johnny' it accepted fine, so from now on you all call me 'Johnny' :-)
    All your first name are belong to us.

    /Mads, ups sorry.. /Johnny

  79. No change to my preferences by limegreen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Funny - my preferences continue to remain un-ticked.

  80. Is this even legal? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sorry to ask the obvious question, but since IANAL, I'd be interested to know. If you have explicitly said you don't want a company to reveal your private details, can they legally change your mind for you? I realise that blanket statements about changing Ts&Cs without notice might apply to services like Hotmail, but that doesn't necessarily make them legal either. I would have expected this to fall foul of data protection legislation, at least in most European countries.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  81. DHCP for cable, what a joke. by Erris · · Score: 2
    Why would you need DHCP for an advertised, "always on " connection? Cable networks are supposed to have a 1:1 IP to box ratio, and swiches require MORE hardware and cost MORE money to administrate.

    DSL vrs. Cable is a good deviding line bewteen service and a digital TV/Browser in the US. The DSL companies were generally more competitive and offer better terms of service than the entertianment derrived cable companies. Mine, Cox, is one of the worst, opting for all M$ crap they think gives them control and optimize their ability to squeeze their clients. They block ports 25 and 80, forbid VNC and all forms of "servers", and charge $15/month extra for a static IP.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:DHCP for cable, what a joke. by peter · · Score: 2

      They use DHCP because they don't guarantee that they won't change your IP. They do network upgrades, and I assume they need to change your IP to put you on a different subnet for whatever reason. (business customers get a static IP). You don't have to run a DHCP client, but if you don't, and they change your IP, they'll drop all your packets. BTW, eastlink can provide telephone service over their data network, as well as analog and digital cable, so they're competing with the phone company for local phone service as well as data.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  82. Report bad HTML in IE by wowbagger · · Score: 2

    The problem with IE reporting invalid HTML is that all Microsoft products that automatically generate HTML generate invalid HTML.

    Now, think about this: Joe web developer fires up Frontpage, and makes his page. He saves it, and loads IE - immediately IE pukes up half a dozen HTML errors, then starts on the Javascript....

    Now, what do you think poor dim Joe will think? He'll think "What a piece of crap this FrontPage is! It doesn't work - I'll get something better"

    So, since making FrontPage/Word/... generate good HTML is "hard" (for the guys at Microsoft....), the guys in the FrontPage team yelled over the wall at the IE guys, "Hey, can you make it so IE won't puke if we don't close our tables?" "Sure thing, George ...."

    Plus, by making the HTML so generated only work with IE, you help tie the products together (illegally extending your monopoly).

    Remember, when considering a new market, Microsoft always asks themselves "And how does this help us dominate some other market?" Microsoft won't move into a market just to take over that market, they want to be able to get leverage to take over some other market too.

    Example: why is it that Microsoft hasn't targeted mapping companies like Delorme for destruction? Microsoft has Streets and Trips, they could easly crush Delorme AAA MapNGo like a bug. Why don't they? Because, at this time, owning the mapping software market won't allow Microsoft to take over any other market.

    So, making IE not puke on bad HTML helps Microsoft toward domination of the market for web design tools, and domination of the market for web design tools allows them to dominate the market for browsers. Doing things right doesn't.

  83. Re:Hotmail's privacy statement is TRUSTe Approved. by darien · · Score: 2

    Doesn't really matter who it's approved by if they don't follow it!

  84. Re:Wrong direction by Zathrus · · Score: 2

    It wouldn't accept 18xx years, however I am now born on a date that is equally useless to them.

    It also doesn't ask for street address or income - just birthdate, country/state (state changes depending on country selection, as does available time zones -- apparantly there are no "outlying US islands" in EST/EDT), and occupation (now "Other").

  85. Suggested Personal Information by stinkydog · · Score: 2

    MS Passport for:

    Jake Blues
    1060 West Addison
    Chicago IL
    July 1, 1952
    Male
    Musician / Guest of the state

    It not only fools marketing droids, it also works good on Illinois Nazis as well!

    SD

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
  86. Illegal in the EU by theolein · · Score: 2

    Someone posted further down that this is illegal in the UK. IANAL but as far as I can see, it's also ilegal in most of the EU.
    The EU laws on data protection is where you can read the relavent material. There is also a link there to mail the EU commission on abuse of these laws.

  87. Re:Alternatives? by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
    my mac.com email is free, web-based, devoid of banners, and apple probably wouldn't pull this kinda crap.

    I remember a friend of mine tried to get me to use a mac.com account: it wouldn't let me use it though, because I didn't have a Mac. It didn't surprise me, the mac.com services are basically included in the price of the Apple hardware.

    A week ago said friend told me they no longer locked out people who didn't use Macs - but as far as I'm concerned they already told me to get lost in the least subtle way possible, so why should I bother with them?

  88. Here are a few of my favorite things! by germinatoras · · Score: 3, Funny

    JPEG's and banners and flash animations
    Popups and opt-outs and priv'cy violations
    Big boobs and sleep pills and herbal ginsengs,
    This is the junk that my Hotmail box brings

    Fake "" tags, disable Java,
    Disable plugins from Macromedia
    Limit the things that your browser can do,
    This is the junk hotmail forces on you

    When the dot nets,
    When the hail storms,
    When the passport pries,
    I simply sign up for more hotmail accounts
    And continue to falsify

    ActiveX scripting and ASP pages
    Profiteeting in which hotmail engages,
    Exploiting users who don't have a clue,
    This is what people at Microsoft do

    Bending o'er backwards to meets terms of service,
    Changing agreements that made me feel nervous
    Clauses, execptions will bite you some day,
    This legal mumbo has pushed me away

    When the terms change,
    When the box's checked,
    It's my Waterloo
    I'll never sign up for more hotmail accounts
    From now on I'll use...

    Netscape mail!

  89. One extremely good service for hotmail refugees by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 2
    ... would be oddpost.com

    They are two guys who have written a complete Outlook clone (well sort of) in DHTML. It works really well (if you're an IE only sort of person) and costs about 30 quid a year iirc. You also get POP and IMAP access. Their DHTML webmail client blows Hotmail away, it's got stuff like drag and drop, just like a software email client.

  90. Check out the Hotmail.com titlebar by SteelX · · Score: 2

    I can't believe it says "MSN Hotmail - More Useful Everyday". Sure is "more useful!"

  91. Re:Did anyone actually check this? by hether · · Score: 2

    I checked it, and yes - it had two of three boxes checked. The one not checked was share my first and last name.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  92. My experience by hether · · Score: 2

    Funny thing. I have three accounts on hotmail that I check for various groups. One had the boxes checked, one did not, and one had to be reactivated. When I reactivated, that had the boxes checked. Nowhere in the reactivation agreement does it say anything about sharing your email or other information. It just points people to the privacy policy, which as far as I can tell hasn't been changed yet.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  93. Re:Okay Morons, think on this... by alizard · · Score: 2
    We have a technical term on the Net to describe people like you. The word is tard. Though Micro$hill might be more accurate.
    1. If hotmail had sent out a mailing to all its members telling them a couple of weeks in advance of their policy change.
    2. If hotmail didn't have a privacy policy posted on their site that said specifically that they wouldn't do this without a user's permission, and clicking a user's checkboxes for him only counts as permission in the minds of some Micro$hit employees and you

    Then this would be the usual bitching about drastic TOS changes in a free service. Micro$hit sneaked these changes in without warning or notice. Only an imbecile would describe this as ethical behavior.

    Why don't you go back to debugging your copy of Windows XP Server and leave discussions of how an Internet business should conduct itself towards its user to your betters?

  94. Worst corporate gangsters in history? by gdyas · · Score: 2

    The awful fact is that M$ is one of the most appalling corporate gangsters in all of history.

    HA!

    If you knew anything, anything at all about JD Rockefeller or JP Morgan's operations and tactics at the turn of the last century in the oil and rail industries respectively, you would shit in your hat and praise God for Bill Gates.

    Not to defend that schmuck, but we're talking about two entirely different leagues of malfeasance. You bitch about BSA audits? Try hired jackbooted thugs & private police fucking killing you for talking smack about the company or trying to organize a union. Gates doesn't even exist in the same league.

    --

    The only tool you've got against psychosis is experience.

  95. Looking for hotmail alternatives? by alizard · · Score: 2
    Most people are not going to share their favorite Webmail services here for fear that they'll get slashdotted and that they'll be forced immediately to go to a pay-for-play solution.

    I'd say go to http://directory.google.com/Top/Computers/Internet / -mail/Free/Web-Based?tc=1/... I found "Searched within the category Google Directory for free webmail. Results 1 - 10 of about 1,030"

    You'll probably find that 2/3 of the listings either don't work or went to pay-for-pay... but that still leaves plenty of places to replace hotmail.

    There are also a shitload of sites with free website databases.

    I know this because I had to replace my free webmail account on onebox some months ago when they went to a pay system. However, finding one that supported the service I most needed, remote notification of incoming mail to my real account so I won't have to log in every time I get spammed was very difficult. Finding that took several hours. Finding one that supports POP3 will take a while. If you just want a simple free webmail box, that should take just a few minutes.

  96. Mine wanst checked... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    This is interesting, my choices werent checked. I may have one little difference though, Im set as 'govt/military'. That is the only thing I can think of that would cause them to not change mine...

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  97. Re:DoS: Everyone sign up for a dozen hotmail accou by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    I already have one hotmail account and any relation to reality is a mere coincidence!

  98. Re:in which I attempt to delete my hotmail account by Thing+1 · · Score: 2
    Emphasis mine:

    Their replies were slightly mechanistic, and it is clear (to me, yvmv) that Microsoft has no intention of giving up the information I provided to open my hotmail account.

    I didn't quite parse your acronym. Were you trying to say, "Your Victimization May Vary?"

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  99. Re:DoS: Everyone sign up for a dozen hotmail accou by Mongoose · · Score: 2

    That's when you post user/pass of all your dozens of accounts on the web. Oh dear... =)

  100. Re:Alternatives? by hearingaid · · Score: 2
    You need a machine running MacOS 9 or MacOS X to create an iTools account, which gets you the email address, iDisk and so on.

    However, once the account's created, you can access its services from other machines. The iDisk is accessible by WebDAV and the email by POP3. You still need a Mac to do account management though, like setting vacation messages and forwarding your email; but just checking it, any system will do.

    --

    my old sig used to be funny, but then slashcode ate it and now it's not funny anymore