Slashdot Mirror


George Lucas May Be Completely Evil

gabec writes "Sci-fi Wire is reporting a couple rumors about the changes being made to the original Star Wars trilogy for its next release. That being that Natalie Portman may be being inserted into Episode VI: Return of the Jedi and that universally reviled Jar Jar Binks may be being inserted into Episode IV: A New Hope. May The Force forbid." Mind you this is reported as rumor, but it's so unsurprisingly possible...

298 of 971 comments (clear)

  1. Stupid Star Wars nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You're like abused wives. You keep coming back for more, even though it hurts.

    1. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by digitalunity · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll take all the punishment George can give out for just a little more Natalie Portman

      :)

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    2. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Gorbie · · Score: 3, Funny

      In Boston we can get the fans at the Fleetcenter to chant "Wife-beater" at Jason Kidd during a playoff game. Maybe we need to come up with a chant for Lucas to be heard at theaters across the nation.

      "NERD ABU-SER! NERD ABU-SER!"

      Of course any chant with Jar-Jar's name in it wouldn't be worth the breath it expelled...so we'll leave him out of it!

    3. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by flewp · · Score: 2

      I hear yelling Jar Jar Binks in a crowded movie theater is no worse than yelling fire.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    4. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by grytpype · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, you SW nerds should be on Maury.

      Maury: How did it feel when you saw how much Episode 1 sucked?

      Nerd: Ah felt betrayed, and ah felt abused. He abused me like ah was a wet food stamp!

      Maury: But you stood in line for weeks to be the first nerd to see Episode 2!

      Nerd: [Nods, weeping]

      Maury: Well, why do you keep going back to him?

      Nerd: Because ah LOVE him! I LOVE George Lucas!

      --

      - Have a picture

    5. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by eison · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      is competition good, or is duplication of effort bad?
    6. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      The difference of course being, he has to come back. And once he does that, he's making threats on your life an can be arrested. I think the guy did a good thing, sure it might have been better if he was armed with a rather large firearm, but it got the desired results, the girl was left alone (and hopefuly will avoid the guy from now on) and the guy shit his pants.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    7. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      The parent of this thread was in exteemly poor taste. I am rather open when it comes to people expressing "humor" and opinions in potentialy offensive ways, but when I read the original post, the hairs on the back of my neck stood straighter than a telephone pole.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    8. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by grytpype · · Score: 2

      More likely, we're going to have Portman standing next to Anakin/Vader and Obi-Wan in that last scene where they appear to Luke in spirit form so they can smile and nod at him.

      --

      - Have a picture

    9. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by MouseR · · Score: 2

      That would be stupid. She's never been reported to having the Force.

      Unless Anaking has some serious saber powers which Lucas didn't tell us about.

    10. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by grytpype · · Score: 2

      Well, you've got me there. But you have to admit it's more likely than a girl-on-girl scene with Carrie Fisher, right? I mean, have you seen what Carrie looks like lately?

      --

      - Have a picture

    11. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Fesh · · Score: 2

      Actually... The more I think about it, the less I'm convinced that the change was made to make Han a more likeable character... Seems to me that his dialogue with Jabba in the hangar would be a little more of a non-sequitur than it already is without that detail.

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    12. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by logicnazi · · Score: 2

      at first I thought this was just an incredibly stupid comment now I realize it is just a bad joke aimed at star wars fans

      --

      If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    13. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by matrix29 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're like abused wives. You keep coming back for more, even though it hurts.

      Damn and I was hoping in Episode 3 we find out Jar Jar Binks is actually the thinner version of Jabba the Hut. I figure Jar Jar (once he realized how badly he screwed over the Federation and after he grew a conscience) started over-eating to subsume his growing guilt, started a black-market trading operation to undercut the Empire financially, and finally lost his mind when he started eating his Queen Amidala dancer-substitute. Face it folks - Jar Jar is Jabba the Hut. Once you accept it, all of it makes sense.

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    14. Re:Stupid Star Wars nerds by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • You're like abused wives. You keep coming back for more, even though it hurts.

      This is so insightful that it makes me wish for a moderation of "Troll, +1"

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  2. Maybe interesting... by bluprint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    who wants to see the exact same movies re-released anyway? Just rent the tapes....

    --
    A modern day witchhunt.
    1. Re:Maybe interesting... by damiangerous · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Just rent the tapes....

      You know, I'd buy them, if only I could. But you know what? I can't. I can buy the new versions of 4,5 and 6, but not the original versions. Lucas won't sell the originals anymore. So, no money from me, George.

    2. Re:Maybe interesting... by ralico · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well.... it would be nice to have the original content of IV-VI on a legal DVD (as opposed to the bootlegs )

      I, for one, curl my lip every time I see Greedo make that first shot. What was he trying to do?

      --

      SCO to Hell
    3. Re:Maybe interesting... by JWW · · Score: 2

      You think I'm going to sell my original tapes at a garage sale? Think again.

    4. Re:Maybe interesting... by ParticleGirl · · Score: 2

      Actually you're right. It was originally named Star Wars but was renamed "Episode IV: A New Hope" when the sequels were picked up. That's also when Lucas had to come up with backstory enough to write two more episodes to follow the original, and the idea for the prequels seems to have sprouted in his knobby little head.

      --
      Do something about world hunger. Click here
    5. Re:Maybe interesting... by BigBir3d · · Score: 2

      Actually, the first release of Star Wars, Episode 4, it did not have any mention of "Star Wars: A New Hope," but when it was re-released in '79, it had that added to the scrolling intro.

      It is about as significant as the renaming of Return of the Jedi, orginally called, "Revenge of the Jedi." I have a copy of the old trailer here.

    6. Re:Maybe interesting... by Anomolous+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What was he trying to do?

      To me, it feels like an attempt to eliminate the moral ambiguity of Han Solo. In making Greedo shoot first, Solo was no longer the agressor; he was merely defending himself. To me, this takes away a lot from the original movie, where Solo was more or less portrayed as a sketchy character in the tradition of film noir flicks. The very things that make most characters interesting is their unpredictability that is derived from an unclear vision of their moral convictions.

      To put it bluntly, characters who are purely good or purely evil are very boring.

      --

      "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." - George Bush
    7. Re:Maybe interesting... by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

      The original "Revenge of the Jedi" only appeared on some pre-released action figures and posters and such. The name was changed to "Return of the Jedi" prior to its first theatrical release.

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

    8. Re:Maybe interesting... by cheese_wallet · · Score: 2

      I suppose it could be that (the self defense argument). But in the real world, just pointing a gun at somebody is considered "the use of deadly force" and I do mean "use".

      So, from and adult point of view, Han was morally free to shoot greedo at anytime while greedo was pointing the gun at him.

      From a childs point of view, having greedo shoot first was maybe a way of making that point more clear.

    9. Re:Maybe interesting... by BinxBolling · · Score: 2
      If Lucas is a greedy as everyone makes him out to be, then it would make sense to release as many different versions onto DVD as possible. This would allow us geeks to get the version of start wars we want, while still appeasing the general public with the digitally modified and improved version.

      Not necessarily. Surely there are some fixed costs associated with each version that you want to release. The 'untouched original' version may not sell enough extra copies beyond what would have been sold anyways to recoup those costs. How many people that would prefer the original will break down and buy the modified version if the original isn't available?

  3. I thought she was dead. by UnhandledException · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Didn't Leia say, "She died when I was very young." Wait, they're not going to make her a jedi-ghost, are they?

    1. Re:I thought she was dead. by Triskaidekaphobia · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If Obi-Wan lied to Leia about her brother then he could have lied about her mother as well.

      That said, Lucas is incredibly naive if he thinks anyone is going to accept Jar-Jar being added to Ep IV. Personally, I think AICN has been fooled yet again.

    2. Re:I thought she was dead. by Saint+Nobody · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and luke thought his father died when he was very young, too. what's you're bloody point?





      SPOILER
      luke's father isn't dead. he wnet to the dark side and became darth vader.

      --
      #define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}
      F(#define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}%cF(%s))
    3. Re:I thought she was dead. by brain-in-a-box · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they can clone thousands of storm troopers, we shouldn't they clone Luke Skywalkers mother, too ?
      This will result in a funny scene:
      Yoda: If he fails everything is lost.
      Obi-Wan ghost: No, there is still his sister.
      And if she gets screwed, we can still clone them 1384 times.

      --
      You are the dot in slashdot !
    4. Re:I thought she was dead. by zeus_tfc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Darth Padme will be in a black leather get up complimenting Vader's attire.

      Natalie Portman in black leather... Mmmmmmmm...

      Uh, *Cough* Um, sorry, I was in a happy place there for a second.

      --
      "...At the end of the day"..."when everyone goes home, you're stuck with yourself." RIP Layne Staley
    5. Re:I thought she was dead. by r00tarded · · Score: 3, Funny

      like george wont hack that bit out and change it to "she was able to sell a lot of action figures and posters when i was very young."

    6. Re:I thought she was dead. by UnhandledException · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just want to say that that was a Hell of an outfit to wear to a "let's be friends" talk.

    7. Re:I thought she was dead. by Gudlyf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I figured they'll insert Padme into that ghost sequence at the end of Return of the Jedi (where you see Yoda, Obi-Wan and Anakin waving to Luke as the celebration fireworks go off) *shrug*

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    8. Re:I thought she was dead. by JWW · · Score: 2

      What? In Jedi, Leia refers to foggy memories of her mother... This means that her mother must have lived with her on Alderaan AFTER Anakin turned into Vader.

      His mother's death is what turns him over to the dark side. He's stared sliding down the dark path already.

    9. Re:I thought she was dead. by joib · · Score: 3, Funny


      We're getting DEEP into nerdism here

      To say the least... ;-)


      It's interesting to note that while Vader does know he had a child, it isn't until he reads Luke's mind in ROTJ does he realize he had twin children.

      I don't see any inconsistency here. Anakin bangs wife -> wife gets pregnant. Even Anakin should understand that his wife is pregnant even if she wouldn't tell him, no matter how dim-witted he is. And seing how he acted in "Attack of the clones", that is plenty dimwitted indeed. Anyway, so Anakin joins Palpatine (hey, I would too if I'd get that cool black helmet with The-breathing-sound) and leaves Padme. Or maybe Padme dumped Anakin? You know, maybe she wasn't satisified, or she was plain weirded out when Anakin fingered her with that robotic hand (you can see the robot hand at the end of "attack of the clones")? ;-D

    10. Re:I thought she was dead. by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Oh like this one:

      http://www.sithvixen.com

    11. Re:I thought she was dead. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      If you haven't figured out that the guy who controls the narrative franchise can make up mean down, can completely ignore anything that compromises continuity, and in fact is in charge of logic, physics, and the Existence of God (all of which are subject to change at the drop of a quill), then you really haven't got it yet.

      There is no Leia. There is no Anakin. There is no C-3P0. There's only a bloated megalomaniac and the huge, uncritical fanbase that throws money at him.

    12. Re:I thought she was dead. by Tarkwyn · · Score: 2

      Didn't Leia say, "She died when I was very young." Wait, they're not going to make her a jedi-ghost, are they?

      She could still be alive. Maybe we're going to have Darth Natalie show up :)

      Perhaps after ROTJ, once everything has died down - BAM! out pops Darth Nat. She'd be more machine than woman, although probably have a much more fetching array of different black masks to wear.

      I'll stop now as I could very well end up eating these words...

      --
      Tarkwyn.
    13. Re:I thought she was dead. by jafac · · Score: 2

      heh heh, "Bored Now" Padme. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    14. Re:I thought she was dead. by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      Clones are inherently inferior to their natural counterparts, at least in the Star Wars universe. They have a tendency to be flaky to the point of insanity. An example of this would be Joruus C'baoth, the dark Jedi clone employed by Admiral Thrawn. Cloning Jedi would make for some very unstable people with some very frightening powers.

      And this would be bad for the Empire in what way?

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    15. Re:I thought she was dead. by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

      Minor nitpick:

      Leia said she remembered images and feelings. That her mother was "...kind, but sad."

      Now, Leia being very very strong in the force as we know she is, couldn't she have picked up these images as an infant, or even while in the womb?

      She had "always known" that Luke was her brother, after all.

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

  4. I knew it.... by NetJunkie · · Score: 5, Funny

    As soon as Lucas said he was waiting for the new three to be released before putting the originals on DVD, I said he was going to do this. What will it be called, Super Special Edition? Speciai Edition Pro? 32-Bit Special Edition Turbo?

    1. Re:I knew it.... by flying_triguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about Star Wars Trilogy - XP

    2. Re:I knew it.... by blankmange · · Score: 2
      Double Secret Edition (regards to Animal House) or

      Edition 'R' (big spoiler and exhaust pipe on it) or

      Director's Cut (any 3rd edition out there)

      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    3. Re:I knew it.... by Decimal · · Score: 2

      What will it be called, Super Special Edition? Speciai Edition Pro? 32-Bit Special Edition Turbo?

      Super Star Wars Alpha II Turbo... and I hear young Anakin will be playable as a secret character! Button mashers beware!

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    4. Re:I knew it.... by isli · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about Star Wars Trilogy - XP

      for Xtra Portman...

    5. Re:I knew it.... by nathanh · · Score: 2

      Turbo Special Edition Alpha 2 Plus

    6. Re:I knew it.... by Thing+1 · · Score: 2
      As soon as Lucas said he was waiting for the new three to be released before putting the originals on DVD, I said he was going to do this. What will it be called, Super Special Edition? Speciai Edition Pro? 32-Bit Special Edition Turbo?

      Well, just look at the bright side -- Lucas waited.

      He could just as easily have milked close to twice the amount out of DVD owners (release now, then release again with new scenes).

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  5. But why??? by RayChuang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not sure if this is even a good idea.

    It might work for continuity purposes (in George Lucas' mind), but frankly, most Star Wars fans prefer Episodes IV-VI to be as unchanged as possible even after Episode III is released. Lucas will be accused to overtinkering with the first Star Wars trilogy, and that won't win him friends among old-time Star Wars fandom, that's to be sure.

    --
    Raymond in Mountain View, CA
    1. Re:But why??? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      as much as I love star wars - I cant stand lucas... basically I see him as someone who's whole career is riding on the one good success he had - A new Hope, ep IV....

      He is *not* the genius visionary that all his buddies and hollywood ass kissers like to tell him he is - he just had one really good idea - but now he is just a greedy flipping bastard without imagination and vision. The star wars universe has been built up and expanded upon by the great fans that have loved the original seed that lucas planted and nurtured it into a mature and full concept - the only thing lucas does for the sar wars universe these days is capitalize on it.

      he is not a good director, he is just someone who stumbled onto something that became great - regardless of him. but he keeps his imperial grip on the concept and makes himself more and more into the palpatine we despise....

      /rant

    2. Re:But why??? by crimoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've been a Star Wars fan from day 1. Sure I'm annoyed with Jar Jar, and sure there are moments in EVERY episode that are corny, but I love the story - every version of it.

      Personally I would LOVE for Lucas to tinker with ANY episode that he wants to. Barring a complete rewrite of the story I'll be chomping at the bit to see what layers of the story can be added.

      If he blows it and introduces something new and corny I'll just watch my older VHS copy of the episode, no harm done. If he pulls a rabbit out of the hat and adds more depth, or better effects, or ties the story together better I'll eat it up.

      Star Wars isn't sacred and written in stone. It's just a story, one of the most epic stories ever told. Obviously as time goes on the story will grow (fan fiction, Lucas himself) and evolve (remastering, etc.). Given the advances in technology I'd love to see all of the episodes stiched together seamlessly. How many of us wouldn't want to fiddle with the originals if we were in Lucas' position?

    3. Re:But why??? by p3d0 · · Score: 2
      I cant stand lucas... basically I see him as someone who's whole career is riding on the one good success he had...
      You know, the guy took a couple decades off to raise a family.
      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    4. Re:But why??? by Dan+D. · · Score: 2

      Yeah... and I'm sure there won't be a million copies of those sold either.

      --
      People who quote themselves bug the crap out of me -- Me.
    5. Re:But why??? by SamTheButcher · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It will be like the "New Coke". They'll introduce the new versions, there will be an outcry, and they'll release the "Super Classic" first trilogy. More money for everyone except us Star Wars geeks.

      I probly won't care about the tinkering so much as I'll be interested in seeing how he does it. But I'd prefer to have the *originals* on dvd as well as the "new & improved" versions.

    6. Re:But why??? by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 2

      Lucas will be accused to overtinkering with the first Star Wars trilogy, and that won't win him friends among old-time Star Wars fandom, that's to be sure.

      It's too late for that. He already overtinkered with it when the Special Edition was released.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    7. Re:But why??? by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2
      It's generational... if Lucas hadn't made it big in movies, he'd probably be tinkering with some American Graffiti-style hot rods like many other men of his age (my dad included).

      Instead, he has some cool 'hot-rod' movies to tinker with, and with who knows how much unused footage just begging to see the light of day, he has the 'spare parts' ready to go.

      Or maybe he's just annoyingly insecure about his creations. Personally, I say that if he's going to tinker, I hope he digitally removes the entire Ewok race from ROTJ.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    8. Re:But why??? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      Being able to recognize other people talent, and more, to aknowledge other people superiority, is a sign of talent.

      Um, right. Either that or listening skills, anyway. Everyone knows how good Kurosawa was. The fact that lucas knows dosn't make ep1 and 2 any better.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    9. Re:But why??? by ajs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "[George Lucas] is *not* the genius visionary that all his buddies and hollywood ass kissers like to tell him he is"

      Heh, I always love to hear this kind of uninformed sillyness. It's what keeps me going.

      First off, as for directing, Lucas is good. He directs well, and his visual sense is utterly amazing. He's terrible at some things, and I would never rank him with someone like Kubrik or Hitchcock. There are, however, only a handful of people who can make a movie as physically engaging as episodes IV, V and II. Technically he does a good job.

      But no one sings Lucas' praises solely for his directorial work. The reason that he's refered to as a giant in the industry is the sheer number of times he's changed the way Hollywood works! You may have heard of the names Skywalker Sound, Lucasfilm, Lucas Arts, Pixar, ILM? These are all Lucas companies that have contributed hugely to the modernization of the movie-making industry. Having created any *one* of them would have been an achivement worthy of comment in Hollywood. Having created all of them is frankly stunning.

      There are also less... wholesome things that I credit the man with genius and visionary status for. He forsook pay on episode IV in return for merchandizing rights. He was frankly laughed at for asking for this, but the studio happily gave away the "worthless" merchandizing rights. No studio will ever be able to take that decision lightly again because it was George Lucas who showed Hollywood what those rights were really worth. That money paid to turn ILM and Lucasfilm into forces to be reckoned with in Hollywood and in turn founded Skywalker Sound, Pixar, and lots of other little companies as spinnoffs (can anyone remember the name of the medical imaging company that Pixar spun off?)

      You may or may not like or respect Lucas, and that call is all yours, but I think genius visionary is a title that can be safely awarded to anyone who slaps Hollywood to its senses and ushers in the age of digital effects and later digital film making.

    10. Re:But why??? by Krelnik · · Score: 4, Interesting
      > ...this kind of uninformed sillyness.

      > ...He directs well....There are, however, only a handful of
      > people who can make a movie as physically engaging
      > as episodes IV, V and II.

      How about practicing what you preach? Lucas did not direct V, Irvin Kershner did.

    11. Re:But why??? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      those are good points - but I would not be so quick to award all of the credit to lucas himself... there are many people involved in creating a movie - or special effect technologies that are as of yet un heard of... a good friend of my fathers is one of the original lucas employees and worked on creating methods for special effects... these people behind the scenes are the unsung geniuses behind what we see in movies today.

      its sad that hollywood just lumps a movie under the director... hollywood is so proud of itself, its a sick and disturbing industry which really teaches some fucked up values to society... it should not be held in such high regard.

      I would say that when lucas asked for the merchandizing rights that that was business genius, a spark of it anyway... but that does not translate directly into directorial genius.

      The problem I see with your statements that he is a genius due to the fact that he has had a major impact on the industry (which he has) - is that "he" as a sole single person can not - and should not - receive all the credit for what movies look like today. He has worked with some real genius minds in the industry - who behind the scenes form what we see in movies from imagination, but more and more I only see lucas as a tired old man struggling to maintain his power and image - yet he no longer has the nimble and creative imagination that may have been there way back when this all started....

      Im not saying that there have not been glimpses and moments of genius from him - there have been... however, I do not like him - as stated... but I do respect what he [the group of people that are "lucas arts"] has accomplished.

      I just dont like ego maniac greedy bastards...

    12. Re:But why??? by eam · · Score: 2

      Ok, but what you said seems to imply that I have as much talent as Lucas. After all, I recognize Kurosawa's talent & acknowledge his superiority.

    13. Re:But why??? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Never ceases to amaze me.

      DVD is not VHS tape. You can have both versions, maybe even 3 or 4, all on the same disc... ah, the wonders of random access.

    14. Re:But why??? by imr · · Score: 2

      ep1 is quite shitty, ok. ep2 is much better in term of writing than the rest of the lot.

    15. Re:But why??? by imr · · Score: 2

      your logic tricks, they dont work with me...

    16. Re:But why??? by danox · · Score: 2

      I think he is insecure about it. From what I have gathered from interviews he was never really happy with the original three. He had to leave out stuff becasue he didn't have the technology to make it look good. What he never seemed to realise was that this fact introduced a new subtlety to his movies. Thing weren't so explicit and obvious. I don't think he has an appreciation for subtlety. so he always had this urge to add something more graphic and visual to his movies, and when he could, he did. I think insecurity is definately the driving force behind it. I think he looks back at the first 3 and wishes he could make them with the tech that he has today.

      --
      "Me and my girl named bimbo . . . limbo . . . spam" - Captain Beefheart.
    17. Re:But why??? by zeno_2 · · Score: 2

      Nah.. lets see what movies he has put out:

      Star Wars: Episode III (2005) (executive producer)
      Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002) (executive producer)
      ... aka Star Wars II (2002) (USA: promotional abbreviation)

      Adventures of Young Indiana Jones: Adventures in the Secret Service, The (1999) (V) (executive producer)
      Adventures of Young Indiana Jones: Masks of Evil, The (1999) (V) (executive producer)
      Adventures of Young Indiana Jones: Spring Break Adventure, The (1999) (V) (executive producer)
      Adventures of Young Indiana Jones: The Trenches of Hell, The (1999) (V) (executive producer)
      Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999) (executive producer)
      ... aka Phantom Menace, The (1999) (USA: short title)
      ... aka Star Wars I: The Phantom Menace (1999) (USA: video box title)
      Young Indiana Jones and the Attack of the Hawkmen (1995) (TV) (executive producer)
      Young Indiana Jones and the Treasure of the Peacock's Eye (1995) (TV) (executive producer)
      Radioland Murders (1994) (executive producer)
      Young Indiana Jones and the Hollywood Follies (1994) (TV) (executive producer)
      Leprechaun (1993) (co-producer) (uncredited)
      "Young Indiana Jones Chronicles, The" (1992) TV Series (executive producer)
      Wow! (1990) (V) (executive producer)

      Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989) (executive producer)
      Land Before Time, The (1988) (executive producer)
      Tucker: The Man and His Dream (1988) (executive producer)
      Willow (1988) (executive producer)
      Star Tours (1987) (executive producer)
      Inside the Labyrinth (1986) (executive producer)
      Howard the Duck (1986) (executive producer)
      ... aka Howard: A New Breed of Hero (1986)
      Captain Eo (1986) (executive producer)
      Labyrinth (1986) (executive producer)
      "Droids" (1985) TV Series (executive producer)
      ... aka "Droids: The Adventures of R2D2 and C3PO" (1985)
      ... aka "Star Wars: Droids" (1985)
      "Ewoks" (1985) TV Series (executive producer)
      ... aka "All New Ewoks, The" (1986) (new title)
      ... aka "Ewoks & Droids Adventure Hour" (1986) (new title)
      ... aka "Star Wars: Ewoks" (1985)
      Latino (1985) (executive producer) (uncredited)
      Ewoks: The Battle for Endor (1985) (TV) (executive producer)
      Ewok Adventure, The (1984) (TV) (executive producer)
      ... aka Caravan of Courage (1984) (TV)
      ... aka Caravan of Courage: An Ewok Adventure (1984) (TV) (UK: theatrical title)
      Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) (executive producer)
      Twice Upon a Time (1983) (executive producer)
      Star Wars: Episode VI - Return of the Jedi (1983) (executive producer)
      ... aka Return of the Jedi (1983) (USA: short title)
      ... aka Star Wars VI: Return of the Jedi (1997) (USA: video box title)
      Body Heat (1981) (executive producer) (uncredited)
      Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) (executive producer)
      ... aka Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) (USA: video title)
      Kagemusha (1980) (executive producer: international version)
      ... aka Double, The (1980)
      ... aka Kagemusha (The Shadow Warrior) (1980)
      ... aka Kagemusha the Shadow Warrior (1980)
      ... aka Shadow Warrior (1980)
      Star Wars: Episode V - The Empire Strikes Back (1980) (executive producer)
      ... aka Empire Strikes Back, The (1980) (USA: short title)
      ... aka Star Wars V: The Empire Strikes Back (1997) (USA: video box title)

      Star Wars (1977) (executive producer)
      ... aka Star Wars IV: A New Hope (1997) (USA: video box title)
      ... aka Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope (1977) (USA: new title)

      Rain People, The (1969) (associate producer)

      (sorry imdb the page this came from is here:
      http://us.imdb.com/Name?Lucas,+George).

      He also had part to do with THX, which I am glad for. Ive liked all the star wars movies, and I loved ep2, I guess its all just up to how you feel about all of it..

    18. Re:But why??? by red_crayon · · Score: 2

      Insightful? You must be fucking shitting me!!!!

      Take all my karma away. I don't care.

      First there was Jon Katz's puking piece yesterday, and now this Lucas-asslicking shill troll is "5-insightful"

      What is slashdot coming to?

      --
      "Never bullshit a bullshitter" All That Jazz
    19. Re:But why??? by eam · · Score: 2

      muttering Damn Lucas and his stupid "Jedi Mind Trick" seminar. There's 200 hundred dollars I'll never see again. /muttering

      Seriously, it does work on my sons:
      Me: You WILL clean up your room!
      Nick: I will clean up my room.

    20. Re:But why??? by ajs · · Score: 2

      Yes, you're right. But I was refering to Lucas' sense of visual style, and while I think he had less impact on that in VI, he certainly was a massive factor there in V. I knew what I was saying, and what the facts were, even if I wasn't as clear about it as I should have been.

    21. Re:But why??? by ajs · · Score: 2

      I would agree fully with your assesment. I wasn't trying to hype lucas up to be any more than that at all. To put it in the words of Zaphod, "he's just this guy, you know?"

  6. HEY! by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jar-Jar is not UNIVERSALLY reviled: the Galactic Senate heartily approved of his proposal to grant Emp^H^H^HChancellor Palpatine emergency powers! Heck, even Anakin seems to like Jar-Jar, and we know what a hothead he can be. Don't you think Anakin would have dismembered Jar-Jar at the first opportunity if JJB was REALLY so reviled?

    Binks: A Future For Your Children. A Future For The Republic. Vote Today.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:HEY! by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      Lengthy explanation:

      "man du" is a Unix command meaning "show me the manual page for the 'du' command". 'du' is a command to show the amount of space used by files. If you pronounce it in a certain way, it sounds like "Mon dieu!" which is a generic French exclamation meaning "My god!" It's something a stereotypical Frenchman might say when he is exasperated, amazed, surprised, etc.

      Of course, there's the old saying that if you have to have a joke explained to you, it ceases being funny. *sigh*

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    2. Re:HEY! by MouseR · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm french. And "man du" nowhere near comes close to be pronounced like "mon dieu".

      Besides, in Québec, we'd apreviate this to a word that starts with "tabar" and ends with "nac".

      But that too wouldn't be funny if I'd explain it to you.

  7. So... by rde · · Score: 2

    So this means that our beloved RotJ is going to be ruined by annoying creatures added in to appeal to the kids? Nooooooo!

    Next thing you know, he'll follow it up with a movie called Jar Jar : The Battle for Naboo, which'll be inane, cute and a travesty of... oh, wait.

  8. No need for hysteria by ShawnDoc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The main rumor is that Portman will film a "flashback" scene to be inserted into ROTJ when Luke asks Leia if she remembers her mother. (Implying that Leia was born a few years before Luke)

    Personally, I like the idea of this. It helps tie all 6 movies together and makes them seem like the series they are supposed to be. I mean, its not like he's totally changing the movie like he did with ANH and the Greedo scene.

    1. Re:No need for hysteria by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      I wonder, could somebody actually watch all the movies in sequence without nitpicking the last 3 to death between the story and the special effects (or lack of).

    2. Re:No need for hysteria by True_Seeker · · Score: 2, Funny
      (Implying that Leia was born a few years before Luke)


      But then how could they be twins? That would be one heck of a labor!
    3. Re:No need for hysteria by Ricdude · · Score: 2

      He could be added to the crowd in the Endor base strategy session with little difficulty, or loss of continuity.

      --
      How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
    4. Re:No need for hysteria by Cheeko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except that Luke and Leia are twins. My guess is that in Episode 3, Obi-Wan takes Luke and Amadala takes Leia and they hide them, raise them etc. Likely Leia remembers her real mother cause she lived with her for a short time before her mother dies.

    5. Re:No need for hysteria by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why is everyone assuming the worst?

      Perhaps Lucas wants to acknowledge what a mistake Jar-Jar is by giving the fans what they want.
      The new scene will have Jar-Jar as a groveling, mistreated, abused slave of the Emperor. The Emperor will be in a discussion with his heads of state while Jar-Jar crawls in on all fours carrying a drink for the Emperor. Obviously beaten and broken, Jar-Jar cringes at each movement of his master.

      Of course... since Jar-Jar is obviously a racial stereotype this may not go over so well...

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    6. Re:No need for hysteria by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      Amidala will get framed by Palpatine saying she [planted Jar Jar|left her post] in the senate to start the war. Palpatine will use this to split Amidala and Anakin up - he swore an oath to the Jedi, and his duty is to the republic, etc.

      She'll go into hiding on Tatooine with the Lars family, where she'll discover that she's pregnant while Anakin is out being Palpatine's flunky after Dooku gets killed by Windu or Yoda.

      How the kids get split up, I don't know.

    7. Re:No need for hysteria by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      Luke specifically asked Leia about her real mother, implying that she was adopted sometime after her birth and raised by another couple. Perhaps Padme will keep her for a while, then die somehow leaving Leia with Organa.

    8. Re:No need for hysteria by fferreres · · Score: 2

      Yeah, and Leia's birth is consealed while Luke's not. If Leia is not supposed to know she has a brother, she must not know her mother's Amadala. Because if she knew her mother was Amadala, then she can easily figure out she has a Brother somewhere (and maybe even know his name).

      I may be wrong, I'm not a religious SW fan (though i like IV, V, VI a lot).

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    9. Re:No need for hysteria by TGK · · Score: 2

      How about this. Lucas doesn't seem to give a rats ass about the man-decades of work that have gone into the Star Wars Universe....

      Chances are... we'll never see any of that.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  9. How dare he... by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...make changes to his own movie!

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
    1. Re:How dare he... by sphealey · · Score: 2
      How dare he make changes to his own movies?
      Once an artist releases a work, it becomes a much a property of the audience as of the artist. If he has the legal right to change it later (say, after it has become wildly popular?), and he does so, that is of course his business. But he shouldn't be surprised if the audience does not accept the revised work, nor if the audience villfies him for so doing.

      sPh

    2. Re:How dare he... by EvlG · · Score: 2

      How does Star Wars become a property of the audience once it is released?? The rights are all with Lucas to do what he wants, the fans be damned.

      Of course, it makes sense for him to listen to the fans, but I don't buy this "it's mine!" crap. He made the movie. It's his movie. He can do what he wants.

      In the same way, we can do what we want by either liking it or rejecting it. But saying it is our property because we paid a few bucks to watch it? That is presumptuous.

    3. Re:How dare he... by sphealey · · Score: 2

      Well, that's the Paul Newman theory of celebrity, anyway.

      For those who aren't auto racing followers: Paul Newman is well-known in the auto racing world for verbally (and sometimes physically) abusing anyone who hints that they might have seen him somewhere off the racetrack. Of course, without those annoying things called "movies" and "fans", he wouldn't have the money to buy lots of shiny race cars, but I guess the Golden Rule applies.

      sPh

    4. Re:How dare he... by sphealey · · Score: 2
      Clearly, I did not mean "own" in the sense of "has legal title to under the laws of the United States of America", but "own" as in the sense of "has stewardship over". As in "the United States Government owns Yellowstone National Park". Can the USG use Yellowstone as a nuclear weapon testing ground? Yes, it can. Should it or will it? I believe, and hope, the answers are no and no.

      Same thing here.

      sPh

    5. Re:How dare he... by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      ...make changes to his own movie!


      It's not his movie anymore. It's a part of the culture. How do I know? Because every time a new one is released, we have all those annoying "Making of..." clips wherein people breathlessly assert that it's a fundament of the culture.


      You know what? Fame costs. Immanence costs. The price here is, Lucas no longer has sole claim to Star Wars. Legally of course he can do what he pleases... but he's still tinkering with a communal thing and had best be prepared for said community to revile him.


      Leave them alone, George. Episode I proved that you have no clue what made Star Wars special. Stop destroying our past.

    6. Re:How dare he... by EvlG · · Score: 2

      Right, we had the same understanding of the word own.

      But I still dont see how the viewers have "stewardship" over the film. We didn't create it. We just paid money to see someone else creation. And that someone else can do as they see fit.

  10. And the craptification will be complete by Anomolous+Cow+Herd · · Score: 2
    I'll admit it, I really did enjoy the original Star Wars Trilogy.

    However, Lucas just didn't figure out that he should've quit while he was ahead. So we get bullshit like Episode I. What an utter disappointment. That was the last new Star Wars movie that I'll ever be tricked into seeing. What remains is only the manifestation of Lucas's desire to ride the wave of merchandising income driven by the sheer inertia of the franchise. The only people that I really see as enjoying the new breed of Star Wars movies are those who are in denial of its poor quality, those who refuse to believe that the best days of their favorite Sci-Fi adventure series is behind them.

    Sorry, folks. All good things must come to an end.

    --

    "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." - George Bush
  11. Why? by crumbz · · Score: 2

    Why is he altering the originals? To screw with our collective mind? It's like removing words from the dictionary in 1984. He is a very bad man, IMHO.

    1. Re:Why? by cjpez · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's like removing words from the dictionary in 1984.

      lol. Right. It's imperative that we ensure our fiction is as absolutely accurate as possible. How will future generations know what might really have happened on Tatooine if it would have been a real place? Who can our children trust when they need to find out how the Rebel Alliance could possibly have destroyed the first Death Star assuming that either of those things existed in the first place.

      Please. Okay, yeah, Lucas may be a jerk for changing stuff around (if, indeed, he ends up doing so), but hell, don't liken it to 1984. It's just a movie.

    2. Re:Why? by cjpez · · Score: 2

      If Kurt Vonnegut wants to rewrite Slaughterhouse Five, more power to him. Why not? It's his creation. I'm guessing there would also be a little "(revised)" or whatever after the title. Just like when Lucas spiffed up Star Wars the first time around, it was "Ultimate" or whatever he called it. If Lucas does it again, it'll be labeled that way. If you're fed up with directors and producers messing around with what you perceive to be classic, great movies, then just follow your own advice and don't see the new versions! Nobody's forcing you to go see a revised Episode 4, and I'm guessing if it ever gets made, nobody will be trying to pass it off as the authentic, original version.

  12. He should spend his time . . . by Ezubaric · · Score: 2

    fixing what's wrong with Episodes I & II. I'm sure there's more extra footage around, and it wouldn't be too hard to shore up the plot in those two installments. I would pay to see The Phantom Edit on the big screen, and I'm sure we could even completely replace Jake Droid with a more lifelike computer animation.

    Certainly the "oops . . . I just blew up a fleet" scene could be repaired.

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
  13. ha by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
    "Mind you this is reported as rumor, but it's so unsurprisingly possible... "

    That gives it away.

    Score:-1, Troll

  14. There's only one thing to say by Wind_Walker · · Score: 2
    YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    I wish that you people would at least *think* before you post online rumors like this one. Jar Jar in Episode 4? It takes place 30 years after Episode 3 ends, and the Gungans have a life span of only 25 years (from Episode 1). And where could Portman get worked into the plot of Jedi? There are no lines in the whole movie that reference a mother figure, only "I am your father". If anywhere, it would be in Empire, where Luke is talking to Obi Won, asking about his parents and finds out about his sister.

    1. Re:There's only one thing to say by jdavidb · · Score: 2

      Luke finds out about his sister in Jedi, not Empire. (Although it is hinted at in Obi-Wan and Yoda's private conversation in Empire after Luke takes off from Dagobah.)

      The lines referring to the mother are in the conversation between Luke and Leia in Jedi. Lucas always said he added this scene in because he intended to make their mother a significant character in the prequels. I'm speculating added footage would involve a flashback on Leia's part.

    2. Re:There's only one thing to say by jmu1 · · Score: 2

      Not exactly correct. In Jedi, Luke asks Leia if she remembers her mother, to which she replies that she only remembers images, that she was very sad. If anything, they would slap some cheezy, editorially non-matching flashback to her childhood visions of her mother. Either way, it would be foolish to think that anyone but possibly Lucas's kids would get any entertainment from it.

  15. Special Special Edition by jimmcq · · Score: 2

    Personally, I liked most of the changes and enhancements of the "Special Editions" (except for Greedo shooting first).

    I thought it was great they Jabba was added to A New Hope, and I look forward to seeing Natalie Portman in Return of the Jedi, but pleeeeease no more Jar Jar.

    1. Re:Special Special Edition by Saint+Nobody · · Score: 2

      i don't care so much about greedo shooting first, when you compare it to that horrile jabba scene. i had almost managed to rationalize it away, thinking, "well he must have put on a few pounds between movies." after all, isn't it supposed to be several years in between episodes 4 and 6?

      then i saw episode 1 and realized that george lucas just didn't see how hideous that scene was because his colon was blocking his view.

      --
      #define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}
      F(#define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}%cF(%s))
    2. Re:Special Special Edition by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I thought it was great the way Jabba was added to A New Hope


      For story continuity reasons, maybe. But the way they physically did it was awfully clunky. They had shot a scene of Han walking around a big fat guy wearing a weird costume. Not "Jabba" enough I guess. So later when they CG add Jabba, the body sizes are off. So Han has to walk on Jabba's tail to walk around him. Bad, clunky. OK, this guy wants to kill me, let me walk on him, but then again the CG Jabba doesn't have a reaction at all anyway to this guy walking on him, so what the hell. Worse, they have to CG elevate Han, so all of a sudden, he just pops up maybe 2 feet, then pops down, no natural ovement at all. Very clunky.


      I also remember, maybe in a comic, that Luke and Leia kissed. Kinda icky since they're brother and sister. Just shows that Lucas never really thought the whole thing out, kinda shooting from the hip. That's not a bad thing, just don't confuse him with a story visionary.

    3. Re:Special Special Edition by thelexx · · Score: 2

      "I thought it was great they Jabba was added to A New Hope"

      Yeah and while they're at it, that Mona Lisa chick could sure use a makeover. Maybe straighten that damned tower too.

      The work was _finished_ and the art entered our minds and conciousness in that form, reinforced by over twenty years of repeated viewing by millions of people. To alter it now is tantamount to my exaggerations above. This just proves how out of touch with what he has created Lucas is. He really must see Star Wars simply as a rehash of the cheap serials from his youth, because he sure treats it that way. Screw him. Phantom Schlock was the last SW movie I will see in the theatre, and as I've stated before, though less brusquely, he can shove his revisionist DVD's up his ass.

      LEXX

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    4. Re:Special Special Edition by Foochar · · Score: 2

      The kiss is in Empire, after Han saves Luke on Hoth. Han is being his normall boastful self and Leia decides to show him that he's not all that and plants one on Luke. Keep in mind that at this point they don't know that they are related. Luke leans back with a big grin on face, and Chewie chuckles in background. Han turns to Chewie and says "Laugh it up". That should be enough to bring the scene back to mind for most of the people here.

      --
      "You can't fight in here! This is the war room" --Dr. Stra
    5. Re:Special Special Edition by Saint+Nobody · · Score: 2

      but, if you'll remember, jabba was watching the pod races in episode 1. and he was looking pretty damn fat. i somehow convinced myself to believe in the weight loss between "a new hope" and "return of the jedi", but i won't buy into the weight loss between "phantom menace" and "a new hope". granted 30 years is enough time to lose a lot of weight, but jabba doesn't exactly strike me as the kind of guy that would go for a run every day and eat healthy.

      --
      #define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}
      F(#define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}%cF(%s))
    6. Re:Special Special Edition by kpansky · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Yeah and while they're at it, that Mona Lisa chick could sure use a makeover.
      > Maybe straighten that damned tower too.

      Actually, the tower (Leaning Tower of Pisa, I assume) has been straightened out. since the tower was built on what is essentially a sand pocket, the tower has been leening further and further since its creation. Within the last few years many millions of dollars were spent to straighten and reinforce the tower to keep it from collapsing entirely. Just some background information.

      --

      --Kevin
    7. Re:Special Special Edition by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      The kiss is in Empire, after Han saves Luke on Hoth.

      IIRC, there was also a quick kiss in Episode IV right before they swing across the chasm where there should have been a bridge on the Death Star.

    8. Re:Special Special Edition by thelexx · · Score: 2

      No I won't shut the fuck up you shit eating fucktard. OK, so I'm in a bad mood.

      Star Wars = Movie = Art
      Mona Lisa = Painting = Art
      Tower of Pisa = Architecture = Art

      It's all ART, different kinds and qualities, but art none the less.

      He doesn't own my memories or nostalgia, which are the prime motivator for me to re-watch or re-purchase his fucking movies in the first fucking place. DIPSHIT.

      Whatthefuckever.

      LEXX

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    9. Re:Special Special Edition by jafac · · Score: 2

      There's also another kiss when she's patching up his stump in the Falcon after she rescues his whiny ass from the weather vane on the bottom of the cloud city. Very fast, almost glancing. I'm not sure what the whole point of it was.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  16. Isn't this the exact same crowd... by stubear · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...that wants to eliminate copyrights so ANYONE can make changes like this on a whim?

    Yeah, count my vote on that one.

    1. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by cjpez · · Score: 2

      Urm, that's the thing about crowds of people, see? Each person in the crowd can have different opinions. Perhaps the people who care about this stuff just aren't the same people who care about copyrights. Blah, I've been trolled. Whatever.

    2. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • ...that wants to eliminate copyrights so ANYONE can make changes like this on a whim?

      No, this is the crowd that consistently supports fair use of copyrighted works. One explicitely allowed fair use is parody. To me, putting Jar Jar and Amidala into Episodes IV-VI is pretty much creating a parody, and so yes, anyone should be able to do this.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by ParticleGirl · · Score: 2

      You're confusing 'wanting to make changes' with 'having changes forced upon'.

      How is this possibly being forced upon you? You don't have to see it, you don't have to buy it-- you've probably already seen the original and if it's that holy you should already have your very own copy. Lucas never, to my knowledge, said "this is the right and only version" (though his commercial practices may seem that way, and he probably does think that way.) He, like most artists/songwriters, wants to release something he considers more finished. Artists and songwriters often release remixes, too. If you want some particular version of something-- either to mess with it or to keep it pristine-- you should take pains to get it.

      If you "want to make changes" you have to accept other people's rights (especially the original author/artist/etc!) to do the same!

      Yes, I have the original trilogy on vhs.

      --
      Do something about world hunger. Click here
    4. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by DrEldarion · · Score: 2

      and so yes, anyone should be able to do this.

      Including Lucas.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    5. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by Sancho · · Score: 2

      The part about this that bugs /me/ is that I really want the originals on DVD. Not the version 3 releases with Natalie Portman footage, not the version 2 releases with the stupid Ewok song and Greedo shooting first, but the /originals/. With seemless branching available on DVDs, it should be possible to put all three versions on a single DVD without quality or feature loss. But my guess would be that Lucas only releases the version 3 series, which is why I personally am upset at this change.

    6. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Thats the whole point, dummy.

      If film goes to public domain, George can do whatever he likes to the thing, while I can still distribute the originals on whatever medium I like without his over-tinkering.

      It's about choice. Some of us like what hes doing, some dont. The way people talk sometimes, you'd think the idea of choice was some unneeded, valueless concept (or according to those who have a little power or property, downright dangerous.)

      George had his chance, did his thing, got rich, got paid, lived well, made lots of other movies, yadda yadda. Would it kill us to allow the population to pick their poison (in this case, the version of Star Wars) after 20 years .. you know, now that the IP creator has been compensated (and then some) for his work?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    7. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Forcing it upon you my ass. If the original pristien telling of Star Wars is so sacred to you (and if you're a true star wars fan) you would already own the original versions, the THX remastered versions, and the special editions. If you want it on DVD, you've already made a copy from your original VHS, cleaned it up some a burnt your own DVD. Lucas isn't forcing jack shit on you, you're buying it because you want to.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    8. Re:Isn't this the exact same crowd... by plastik55 · · Score: 2

      Yes. Also because without copyrights, I'd be able to get the original, unfucked-with version in a decent format.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  17. Bar Scene by falser · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'd be happy with this news if they decide to replace the alien that was bullying Luke with Jar Jar, and instead of Obiwan cutting off his arm he decides to rid the Star Wars universe of him once and for all:

    JJ: "Meesa wanted man in 12 systems!!!"

    Luke: "I'll be careful"

    JJ: "Yousa be dead like a da Gungans!!!"

    (swoosh! - lops off his head)

  18. It's funny cause it's true by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're like abused wives. You keep coming back for more, even though it hurts.

    The parent will probably end up at -1 flamebait pretty soon, but it's actually an appropriate sentiment.

    If you don't like what Lucas has done or is going to do (Episode 7 anyone?), just give your money to someone else. Break the cycle. His ego is such that he doesn't care if people hate Jar Jar or any of his other silly CGI insertions. AotC will make him millions and episode 3 will make him millions more, regardless. Just let it be and go focus in on other movies and moviemakers. They'll appreciate your 10$ more than Lucas ever will, I'm sure.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:It's funny cause it's true by happyclam · · Score: 2
      If you don't like what Lucas has done or is going to do (Episode 7 anyone?), just give your money to someone else. Break the cycle.

      Yes! Join the cultural revolution NOW!

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
    2. Re:It's funny cause it's true by AshleyB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since when did it become 'ego' for a person to make a film the way he wants to make it?

      But just so I understand, if the MPAA threatens an 'NC-17' rating for a film, that is covert censorship resulting in a movie being changed from the director's vision...but because YOU don't like something the director should cave in to whatever you want??

      You know, it WAS a bummer that the Titanic sank and all those people died...kinda killed the romance; how about a re-write Mr. Cameron?

    3. Re:It's funny cause it's true by pivo · · Score: 2, Funny

      But there was an upside to disco, specificially the associated lasciviousness. There is no upside to Star Wars.

  19. Meesa thinks by teslatug · · Score: 2

    I might skip watching the SW's movies...they've gotten "lazy" in the creativity department anyway.

  20. May not be that bad. by Papa+Legba · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First I want to say that any lengthy insert would be a disaster. I think their is no argument at all on that subject.

    I can , however, see where a small insert would be helpfull to the story line. Something like a shot of jar jar watching luke meet obiwan and saying "the circle starts again" or something similar IANASW( I am not a script writer). A small item to help tie the first three with the next three. With the way that these movies were filmed, in reverse order, Something like this may be necesary to make them feel as a whole series again.

    The other possibility is that he needs to add elements to tie the last three to the middle three. For an example having queen amadala show in return to say that she was never gone but hiding out and once the emporer is defeated we need to go do this. He may have excluded these parts in the original filming becuase it would have created a cliff hanger in the movie that would not be resolved for 30 to 40 years. Now he can add it and start the work, striving for a completed nine movies over three sets of three.

    The point is a little dash of extra may not be so bad, have to see it to judge. Let's just hope this is not done as some marketting stunt to get us all buy the movies AGAIN.

    --
    Papa Legba come and open the gate
    1. Re:May not be that bad. by doorbot.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He may have excluded these parts in the original filming becuase it would have created a cliff hanger in the movie that would not be resolved for 30 to 40 years. Now he can add it and start the work, striving for a completed nine movies over three sets of three.

      My understanding was that the trilogies were supposed to be separate. Yes, there is a background story which flows between the nine, but each trilogy is (I guess) about a different generation. But hasn't Lucas said he wasn't going to make the third trilogy.

      Which brings me to my argument. I have yet to see any convincing evidence that there ever was a trilogy of trilogies. It seems to me that Lucas is just winging it, knowing Star Wars fanatics will blindly follow where their messiah takes them (call it fundamentalism if you want). He may have had the original trilogy in mind when he made the Ep IV (debatable) but I find it extremely hard to believe he had the entire series of nine in mind. Now, however, he's in a position to claim he had the whole thing in mind the whole time, and who is really going to question him? SW zealots take his word as Truth, and nobody else really cares.

      I'm actually planning on seeing AOTC tonight, so we'll see if Lucas manages to impress. I have the advantage of having no hopes that it will... so perhaps this movie will be rated on its own merit and not the merit of the supposed "universe" which "Lucas created." Newsflash: Lucas didn't do a hell of a lot... writers like Timothy Zahn did the great work extending the SW universe. Lucas just gets the credit.

      I'm a former SW fan (fanatic, perhaps, but only a bit beyond the "fan" level). Maybe that makes me a bit disgruntled and angry of how Lucas has fleshed out the plot to "his" movies -- that's fine if they're his movies, but you'd think he'd have the self-interest to make sure the new ones didn't suck. Episode I was just another example of Lucas's complete lack of talent.

      As Han says, "I call it luck."
      To which Obi-Wan answers, "In my experience, there's no such thing as luck."

      Well... who do you like more? I always liked Han.

    2. Re:May not be that bad. by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      As Han says, "I call it luck."
      To which Obi-Wan answers, "In my experience, there's no such thing as luck."
      Since Episode I came out, I've thought that was a funny line, considering how lucky Obi-Wan was in his fight against Darth Maul, who should have rightly killed him. :)
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:May not be that bad. by plaa · · Score: 2

      Maybe that makes me a bit disgruntled and angry of how Lucas has fleshed out the plot to "his" movies -- that's fine if they're his movies, but you'd think he'd have the self-interest to make sure the new ones didn't suck. Episode I was just another example of Lucas's complete lack of talent.

      I've got a conspiracy theory on that one: Lucas of course deliberately made Ep.I suck so that at least the other two would look good in comparison! =)

      On another point, I believe that the general attitude against Jar Jar among the fandom has had an effect on how little Jar Jar was shown in Ep.II. And even when Jar Jar is in the picture, he's a completely new animal - not the same half-witted idiot he was in Ep.I. Along those lines, I don't think Lucas will make any very stupid changes to Eps. IV-VI.

      --

      I doubt, therefore I may be.
    4. Re:May not be that bad. by SuuSt · · Score: 2

      Only a star wars fan would say to themselves:

      "This movie is going to suck, I know it's going to suck. I will not enjoy this movie. Huh? Oh yes, here is my $7 to see a movie that I know for a fact will suck."

    5. Re:May not be that bad. by mobydobius · · Score: 2

      For an example having queen amadala show in return to say that she was never gone but hiding out and once the emporer is defeated we need to go do this.

      Isn't it obvious to all that Amadala will die in the third movie; that her death will be what finally completes Anakin's turn to the Dark Side.

      Anakin finds mother who he loved dead. Kills a village in rage. Anakin falls in love and marries. Anakin loses wife....

      --

      "I like to wear big boy pants."
    6. Re:May not be that bad. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Isn't it obvious to all that Amadala will die in the third movie; that her death will be what finally completes Anakin's turn to the Dark Side. "

      Not really, no. It's a bit of a complicated situation because somehow Amidala is going to give birth to Princess Leia without Anakin ever knowing. It stands to reason that if Amaidala is alive after being with Anakin, but he's not aware of it, that somebody (the Jedi?) helped hide Amidala from him. The only reason I can see for them doing that is if it is pretty damn obvious he's evil. In other words, his trip to the dark side is complete before Amidala is hidden from him.

      If Lucas is smart, Anakin's journey to the dark side will be something more interesting than Count Dookie coming up with some silly plot to piss him off.

      There was a couple of hints in Episode II, though, that suggests that Anakin may be on his way to becoming Vader without external help. He mentioned a point of view on government that loosely reminded me of what the Empire is in the later trilogy. Personally, I think what'll happen is that the Clone War will help him realize that chaos is destroying the universe, so he'll take steps to restore order. Then the Emperor comes by and says "join the dark side, and you have the power to rule the universe fairly..."

      I can even see it happening that the Jedi attempt to stop Anakin, only to severely injure him and require the use of his suit. That alone could be the cause of Vader's personal feelings against the Rebellion...

      Well that's all speculation. Lucas has the opportunity to really make a kick ass story with Episode 3, but I fear what he'll do is write a basic plot and balance it with CG filler. I wish that the guy who wrote Empire Strikes Back would write Episode 3. Could turn out pretty good...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:May not be that bad. by Salsaman · · Score: 2
      Not true. I have a set of old Star Wars comics from 1977-1982, and they definately mention *9* films at some point in the letters pages.

      I can't give you an exact reference right now, since the comics are stashed away somewhere. The letters are quite interesting, there is also the first mention of 'Empire Strikes Back', the suggestion for the title actually came from a fan.

      I'll have to read through them again at some point.

    8. Re:May not be that bad. by rbird · · Score: 2, Informative
      I wish that the guy who wrote Empire Strikes Back would write Episode 3. Could turn out pretty good...

      Unfortunately, she's dead. :( Leigh Brackett only received co-screenwriter credit, but it is well known that Lucas and Kasdan only made a few revisions to her work.

      Bob

  21. Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2

    Since Lucas claims to be waiting for the current trilogy to be complete before releasing IV, V, and VI on DVD, it looks like we'll end up being stuck with the latest and greatest bastardization of the originals. Time to invest in a laser disc player.

    Maybe there will be a hidden feature that will let you play the movie in the original, uncut version.

    --
    "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    1. Re:Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by Ricdude · · Score: 2

      Hmm. I have the original releases on VHS, and the special edition releases. Anyone who can send me a TV-in card that works under Linux, and the UPC codes from the VHS tapes, I'll gladly digitize a copy for. =) VCD/SVCD format, unless you want to send me a DVD burner, too. =)

      Now, if I could just get a reliable site for phantom edit part 2...

      --
      How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
    2. Re:Looks like we're screwed for the DVDs by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see GL try to "insert" Natalie Portman into my own laserdisc copies. If he comes anywhere near them, he's gonna get a bowl of hot grits down his pants.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  22. Tragic by Washizu · · Score: 4, Funny

    How dare he ruin the series by making changes to it after it was released.

    Ooh a new halflife patch!

    --
    OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
  23. Darth JarJar by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 2

    If they're doing all of this revision, I hope JarJar officially goes over to the Dark side and becomes kind of a mini-me to Vader. Call him Darth JarJar. In Episode IV - Death Star Officer to Vader - "(insert new footage of JarJar)The two of you...are the last of the Jedi Order...later, ObiWan can fight BOTH a digitally inserted JarJar and Darth at the same time in a two-on-one fight like in Ep 1. Etc, Etc, the possibilities are endless...

  24. HAHAHAH The arrogance by Augusto · · Score: 2

    But he shouldn't be surprised if the audience does not accept the revised work

    Oh yeah, how much do you want to bet that these DVDs with new footage will sell like hotcackes ?

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  25. What Lucas Doesn't Mention... by DeLabarre · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is that R2D2 and C3PO's memories are accidentally wiped during a bungled attempt to upgrade their firmware in Flash ROM...

    --

    In the Star Trek evil Mirror Universe, virtuoso cellist Yo-Yo Ma is gangsta hiphop star DJ Yo Ma-Ma.

  26. Bootleg Episode 3 by DanMcS · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, I hear that if you cross the International Date Line thrice, backwards, at the equator, and then find the proper site in Taiwan, you can get a copy of Episode 3 before Lucas has a chance to mess it up...

    --
    Communication is only possible between equals
    1. Re:Bootleg Episode 3 by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny

      A glassy-winged sharpshooter, which said it would be my friend, told me Lucas really does plan to do an Episode VII, he just tried to fool us all by saying he had no plans to, until he got I - III out of the way. Turns out Jar Jar is Palpatine's love child and is what drove him to the dark side in the first place. Jar Jar returns in Episode VII as Darth Woogums, takes the remnants of the imperial fleet, sets up shoppe on the planet Potrzebie and bides his time until he can again establish control over the reformed senate. The sharpshooter would have told me more, but Santa Clara County Pest Control seemed keen on erradicating the species and nuked it. There was a curious dark van with them, though, with a license plate reading ILUVJJ and a Lucas Valley Ford frame...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Bootleg Episode 3 by uslinux.net · · Score: 2

      Maybe. There was an article on how people are already bootlegging Spider-Man 2, so if you believe that, perhaps you're in luck :-)

  27. this is a trick by imr · · Score: 2

    to get good ideas from millions of fans.
    Here is my addition to those scripts:
    don't touch the original trilogy, write a new script and do episodes 7, 8 and 9.
    american director are too lazy when it comes to stories: sequels and re-make.

  28. Jar Jar is Chewbacca by smoondog · · Score: 2

    I thought Jar Jar dies in Ep III. Maybe now he is just lobotamized and he forgets to shave. No more "Meesa please", just growls and undiscernable barks. Jar Jar is dead, long live Jar Jar!

    -Sean

  29. Look on the bright side by Washizu · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least this opens the possibility that Lucas could redo Episode I.

    --
    OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    1. Re:Look on the bright side by room101 · · Score: 2

      Great, then he will want to change all the rest to reflect changes to Episode I. Thus generating a truly recursive series?

      We could be getting DVD releases of this stuff for years to come.

      --
      room101 -- how much can you stand before they break you?
      (they always break you eventually)
    2. Re:Look on the bright side by rlangis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He already DID.

      Anyone else remember the scene in the Naboo cruiser where Jar-Jar popped the head off of the red droid? Said droid then went crazy around the droid bay while R2 and the others went up to fix the shield generators?

      It was in the movie, but NOT in the VHS nor DVD editions.

      --
      GIR: I'm going to sing the Doom song now. Doom doom doom doom doom doom de-doom doom doom doom doom doom doom...
  30. A very clever plan by 47PHA60 · · Score: 2

    Lucas wants to erase the cultural memory that the first film was good, the second better, and it all went into the toilet after that.

    Having learned from the previous Special Editions that it is possible to make a good film worse, he will now bring all the films to the same level of quality, thus shutting down any future debates over which movies were worse than the others.

    Unfortunately, his benchmark for quality seems to be that late-70's made-for-TV Wookie holiday special.

    Besides, re-editing the original films could make them better, you know (it worked for the video/cable release of Battlefield Earth. Right?)

  31. From the SlashDot Rumor Mill Dept. . . by PhxBlue · · Score: 3, Funny

    May I suggest a change of motto?

    Rumors for Nerds. Tabloid that Thinks it Matters.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  32. Here is another idea- Star Wars Themes! by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

    Once done with all 6 edisodes, he would go back and make themed versions. Say, replace the Ewoks with Cabbage Patch kids! Or switch the Gungans with the stormtroopers. R rated version with topless Portman and Fisher (maybe even in the same scene!). Star Wars: The Celebrity Version- latest boy band as Jedis, latest girl singer as lead female, couple of rappers as bad guys, etc. My favorite switch would be to switch Admiral Ackbar with Captain Picard, but leave the voice the same.

    On topic- Lucas has always said he thinks of movies as never being done, they are abandoned. Though I think one can end up tinkering too much and screwing up (Jedi's new end song didn't do it for me).

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  33. Re:I knew it.... Star Wars XP - by mjstrom · · Score: 4, Funny

    with new integrated scenses - they're part of the script, they can't be removed.

  34. Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by Kynde · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jar-Jar sure aint "UNIVERSALLY" reviled.
    Hasn't anyone seen the Simpsons episode where the comic store clerk goes to sleep with a life-sized Jar-Jar doll saying "Oh Jar-Jar, no one loves you but me..." .

    Groening couldn't have been more correct there...

    --
    1 Earth is warming, 2 It's us, 3 it's royally bad, 4 we need to take action NOW
    1. Re:Didnt you see the Simpsons episode... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • Hasn't anyone seen the Simpsons episode where the comic store clerk goes to sleep with a life-sized Jar-Jar doll saying "Oh Jar-Jar, no one loves you but me..." .

      While we're trading anecdotes, see Spaced, Series 2.

      • Comic shop owner:All right, Return of the Jedi. Look at the Ewoks. They were crap!
      • Tim: All right, but Jar Jar Binks makes the Ewoks looking like... fucking Shaft.

      After the emotional assraping delivered by TPM and (to a lesser extent) AotC, my one comfort is that the funniest comedy series of recent years is only available on Region 2 DVD, and that most US citizens won't see it, or know about it, or figure out how to get their DVD players to play it even if I gave it to them. That's cold comfort, but I take it where I can get it.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  35. Re:revised ep's IV thru VI? by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2

    Maybe Lucas is taking a marketting note from P-Diddy et.al. and is going to just start releasing "re-mix" movies...

    --
    "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
  36. Who gives a damn? by jcoleman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The movies are the sole intellectual property of GEORGE LUCAS. They do not belong to you. They do not belong to the fans. They do not belong to the merchandisers. They belong to LucasFilm, which in turn belongs to George Lucas.

    These six movies are a saga. They tell a long, complex story with lots of twists and turns. When Lucas comes up with what he thinks is a good idea, he puts it in the mix. If he has to change a couple of things around to fit it in, he does. Big deal. It's not like he's going to change his mind on Darth Vader being Luke's father.

    He can do whatever he wants with his movies, and personally I think he's doing a fantastic job. All six movies will fit together as a cohesive whole when it's all said and done.

    This ain't Shakespeare, folks. Even Tolkien went back and corrected some continuity problems after LotR was published. So get over it.

    1. Re:Who gives a damn? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      they do not belong to you. They do not belong to the fans. They do not belong to the merchandisers. They belong to LucasFilm, which in turn belongs to George Lucas."

      We pay to watch those movies, we want good stuff. Thanks to the backwards movie industry, we pay for movies and THEN watch them. We can't get our money back because the movie was horribly written.

      So yes, we own it. We don't pay for it, it don't exist. Lucas'd be smart to listen to us.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Who gives a damn? by jcoleman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He owes you a good movie? Listen to yourself.

      The "true fans." This is the problem with the movie industry. Everyone is so busy catering to the "true fans" that people forget about making good films. "Oooo, the Tolkien fans won't like it if we take something out of the book." "Oooo, the Star Wars fans won't like it if we put Jar Jar in the next movie."

      The fans' opinion does not matter. If you are truly concerned with artists making good films, then quit expecting them to cater to your every whim. It is not your film. Even if you have every single Star Wars figure, book, bedspread, drinking glass, etc., you still have no say in what an artist puts into his art. You don't hear art collectors saying "I like Starry Night, but I wish Van Gogh had put some more red in it. He owed it to us to paint a picture that we'd like."

      If you don't like what the artist has to say, how his story is told, or what accent his characters speak with then don't buy his work. No one is forcing you.

      You are truly the epitomy of a consumer.

    3. Re:Who gives a damn? by crimoid · · Score: 2


      Thanks to the backwards movie industry, we pay for movies and THEN watch them.

      The vast majority of merchants (in ANY industry) will not give you 100% use out of a product or service and allow you to pay later with zero penalty. How the movie industry is somehow backwards because they use practically universal pay-then-use business practices is beyond me.

    4. Re:Who gives a damn? by !Xabbu · · Score: 2

      Dude... you are so mindbogglingly right it hurts. Its too bad that the bulk of fans out there aren't like you... and me for that matter... I loved Ep 1 and I loved Ep 2. They entertained me. Therefore I got my moneys worth.

      --

      - Jimbob
    5. Re:Who gives a damn? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "The vast majority of merchants (in ANY industry) will not give you 100% use out of a product or service and allow you to pay later with zero penalty"

      Everything I buy at Fred Meyer or Best Buy has a 30-day satisfaction guarantee. Some places charge a restocking fee, fine. That's still better than what you get when you're unsatisfied with a movie.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Who gives a damn? by jcoleman · · Score: 2

      I saw Ep 2 in DLP this past weekend. I recommend it if you can find it near you. I actually drove three hours to see it and it was worth every drop of gas.

      Digital exhibition is truly the future of motion pictures. You will love it...so clear, so crisp, so vibrant, and no scratches, jitter, or that irritating projector noise.

    7. Re:Who gives a damn? by Servo5678 · · Score: 4, Funny
      It's not like he's going to change his mind on Darth Vader being Luke's father.

      The Year: 2007. The Empire Strikes Back: Ultimate Edition hits the screens.

      In a controversially updated scene, Luke follows Darth Vader to the Cloud City of Bespin, where at the climactic moment of the legendary lightsaber duel, Vader says...

      "No, Luke... meesa es your father!!!!!"

    8. Re:Who gives a damn? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      That's not apples to apples. You can enjoy a sports game even if the team loses. Besides, you can watch most sports on TV.

      Face it: Movies are not quality entertainment. The majority of movies out there don't spend enough time worrying about entertaining the audience like they did years ago. Give people a chance to say "I don't like it, here is your penalty", and hopefully we'll see the quality creep back up again. It'd certainly cause George Lucas to enlist some help in making Episode 3 to make sure it doesn't bore the shit out of everybody like 2 did.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    9. Re:Who gives a damn? by marick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The movies are the sole intellectual property of GEORGE LUCAS.

      Ok, I agree, George Lucas owns those movies. But the ideas he put down on film in episodes 4-6 are our common experience. They are part of our culture. We know what happened in the first star wars trilogy and we know what didn't happen.

      I'm from Boston, and I know that in 1986, the Red Sox lost the world series on a grounder through the legs of Bill Buckner. I also know that the Red Sox DID NOT win the world series, have not since 1918. As much as I wish it could be otherwise, this is the way the world is.

      Fiction is otherwise, but it's still a shared common experience. We all know Luke lost his hand in episode 5. We all know Han was encased in carbonite. We all know Yoda dies in episode 6. These are as much facts for us as the 1986 world series or the Apollo moon landing or 9/11/2001 or Tiennanmen Square.

      Now, suppose George Lucas could rewrite history. Would we approve? No, of course not. This is, in many ways, no different. Jar Jar Binks was not in "A New Hope". But now Lucas is saying "No, no, I can change history. I own this Intellectual Property and can do as I wish with it.". In short, yes, he CAN make a mockery of our common heritage. I, for one, certainly hope he doesn't.

      Episodes 4-6 stand on their own as a saga of epic proportions. They live on in my mind as memories of happy days in the past, before the dark times, before Jar Jar. I only hope my children will have the opportunity to feel the same way.

  37. amnesia as a plot device by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny
    Lucas also reportedly told E! Online that the reason droids C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader is because their memories have been wiped prior to the beginning of Episode IV, the original Star Wars movie. "[C-3P0's] memory system has been erased, and so has R2's," Lucas told the site. "So they don't remember anything from the first trilogy. I'm telling you something from Episode III, but I shouldn't be telling you that, but I think most of the fans already know that."

    I wish I couldn't remember anything form the first trilogy either!

    Seriously, though ... it reminds me of one of the Chritopher Reeve Superman movies, where Superman erases Lois' memory, so she won't know for the sequel. Stupid then, stupid now.

    George, why couldn't you have died in the 80s and left us imagining how great the movies could have been?

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  38. You dont need to see these movies... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

    ... this is not the special edition your looking for - move along.

  39. Re:And (roughly) 50 years later... by Saint+Nobody · · Score: 2

    there are several possibilities here:

    1. flashback. simple enough
    2. makeup. through the magic of makeup, they made winona ryder look old in the beginning of edward scissorhands, for instance. it works the other way too -- you can look younger. in addition to all the 30-something high school kids in aaron spelling dramas, they can still make dick clark look alive once a year for new year's eve.
    --
    #define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}
    F(#define F(x) int main(){printf(#x,10,#x);}%cF(%s))
  40. Re:Candidates for new name by Claric · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm thinking more along the lines of Street Fighter 2

    Star Wars
    Star Wars Special Edition
    Star Wars Turbo
    Star Wars Turbo Champions Edition
    Super Star Wars Turbo

    Let's not forget the hacked Japanese imports where Luke Skywalker does two fireballs that move in a sine-wave pattern.

    Repeat the above with Star Wars Alpha.

    Claric

    --
    There's no problem that cannot be solved with a suitable amount of high explosives
  41. What about the originals? by rob_from_ca · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Personally, I don't care what he does to his movie. The sad part for me is that all the work done on restoring footage and reworking original soundtracks is all thrown into these modified special editions. The _original_ films now only exist as worn VHS tapes. The first special editions were different; not necessarily better, but different. Any further rounds of modification will be different still.

    It's sad that the original films have become lost to consumers, and presumably will stay lost. How about if he releases the original, restored (but unaltered) movies on DVD first. Then he's free to add Jar Jar, Natalie Portman, Samuel Jackson, Matt LeBlanc or whoever the hell else he wants to Episodes IV-VI.

    1. Re:What about the originals? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Funny
      The _original_ films now only exist as worn VHS tapes.

      That's odd. I could swear my laserdiscs were of the original films. Aside from the "A New Hope" title, that is. I hear that got inserted in the years between the original theatrical release and the video release. Damn, I wish I knew what happened to the ancient bootleg VHS copy that my family used to have way back when.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    2. Re:What about the originals? by Krelnik · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If you are careful about the DVD mastering, you can do both, actually. Check out the Terminator 2: Ultimate Edition DVD sometime.

      It's a two disk set (or two sided disk, depending on when you bought it). On the first side/disk are three different edits of the film: the original edit, the "special edition" they did for cable a few years back, and an extended edition (hidden behind an easter egg) that includes a few more scenes that aren't even in the special edition. What's great about it is everyone gets what they want: Cameron can deliver the recut version he likes best, and fans can see the other two versions as well. (Cameron's preference apparently is the middle version, which is why the longest one is hidden behind an easter egg).

      How do they jam three separate edits of a 152 minute movie on one DVD? They don't. They take advantage of the seamless branching functionality that has been in the DVD format all along, and re-use the sections of the flick that are unchanged from one edit to the other.

      Now, the question is: is Lucas is smart enough to do this?

  42. Not only wrong quote... by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    Yoda tells Luke that he trained Vader, that Vader was his student when so far that doesn't seem to be the case.

    My only problem is that I think some of Eps II that hit the cutting room floor and the short span of digital recording time made the actors seem horrible.

    If things get inserted smoothly and correct then it's okay.

    Maybe she isn't a ghost, maybe she talks to them and they don't know it or something... she's underground?

    1. Re:Not only wrong quote... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Sure it is, Yoda apparently trains all the young Jedi.

    2. Re:Not only wrong quote... by reverius · · Score: 2

      Why do I recall that in Empire Strikes Back, on Dagobah, Yoda says something about "i cannot train this one, he has no patience" immediately before/after (I don't remember) referring to how he trained Anakin? Or am I crazy?

      -- Reverius

    3. Re:Not only wrong quote... by reverius · · Score: 2

      Try watching the Dagobah scene in ESB, and tell me there's not a reference in there to Yoda teaching Anakin...?

      It's possible they are both correct. I think that it is true that Yoda teaches -all- Jedi... until they are taken as Padawan learners by other Jedi Masters. Remember the scene in Episode II with Yoda's 30-some-odd students? :)

      -- Reverius

    4. Re:Not only wrong quote... by jafac · · Score: 2

      yeah yeah, and in EIV, Obi Wan says that the Jedi defended justice in the old republic for over 1000 generations. In EI and II, it's 1000 years. Unless those Jedi breed really freaking fast.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    5. Re:Not only wrong quote... by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      yeah yeah, and in EIV, Obi Wan says that the Jedi defended justice in the old republic for over 1000 generations. In EI and II, it's 1000 years. Unless those Jedi breed really freaking fast.

      I would suspect that is where the "force", "the force-push", and "Jedi mind tricks" come in handy.
      (Speaking of that I'm reminded of a joke.)
      Chinese man say, "He who pleasures himself always come in handy later on."

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  43. Maybe Not So Evil... by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

    AICN also reported a wild rumor that the reviled computer-animated character Jar Jar Binks may wind up in a new, revised version of Episode IV.

    In this version, Han does shoot Greedo first, but misses and hits Jar Jar, causing the Gungan to explode into pixelated goo.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  44. Natalie again by WildBeast · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one who doesn't find her beautiful? I mean she's just your average girl. There's nothing extraordinary about her looks.

    1. Re:Natalie again by t_allardyce · · Score: 2

      Its much like Britney. Except Natalie was actually much more attractive a couple of years ago, where as Britney has always been an average-looking dumb cheerleader-bimbo with little-to-no talent. Its all about hype, popularity and the stupid trendyness/x-factor. But anyway.. here are some good one-liners:

      -Natalie Portman and 'Insert' in the same sentence, yeah baby.

      -They can insert her into any film

      -Error: Please insert Natalie Portman to contine...

      -I hope she inserts herself into my life

      -I've got something you can insert

      -Look, my light-sabre has grown 2 feet!

      -I bet she enjoys a good insertion

      No, but seriously, falling in love with the dark side is evil.

      I prefer Lacey Chabert

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Natalie again by leifw · · Score: 2
      I'll second that.
      On another note (which I have to admit was picked up on my mother), Portman just doesn't carry herself or deliver lines with the nobility and royalty that Carrie Fisher (Leia) did. Portman sounds much less believable like someone who was trained as royalty.

      Seriously, though, remember the royal, righteous indignation that Fisher delivered when Darth threatened her planet if she wouldn't reveal the location of the rebel base? Portman has never lived up to that. A great opportunity would've been in Ep I when Quigon-Gin told her (masquarading as the handmaiden) what the queen wanted. Instead of carrying even the royal air that you might expect from someone who attends royalty or one who was elected to a leadership position at a young age, she acted like a scolded child.

    3. Re:Natalie again by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      I dunno. I think she's pretty enough -- and hey, let's be honest, I certainly wouldn't kick her out of bed -- but I too have never quite understood the hot grits obsession on /. Maybe that's the joke -- it's a (self-?) parody of fanboy obsessiveness over someone who really isn't THAT outstanding.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  45. Sidebar - Prequel characters on Star Tours by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2
    There was a sidebar on the story that indicates that the Star Tours ride at Disney World would be retrofitted to include prequel characters. While I don't like tinkering with the original films, this might actually be a good idea for the ride, but not because of the characters.

    When Star Tours first hit Disneyland, I thought it was a great idea, since the big hype was the ability to change films and freshen up the ride regularly. Well, it's been something like ten years and the ride is dusty, poorly maintained, and they still haven't tried to put a new film in the thing. If it takes having the shuttle land on top of Jar Jar to freshen up what's otherwise a great ride, so be it. It is a shame, though, that they (Disney/Lucus) has this ability to change out the films and they never bothered with it.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  46. Killing Jar Jar by jms · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here's an idea.

    Remember the scene where Greedo confronts Han in the cantena. Now we all know that in the original Star Wars, Han shoots first, but for the "special edition", Greedo shoots first, and his shot hits the wall next to Han.

    Imagine Jar Jar sitting next to Han. Greedo shoots first, blowing Jar Jar's head off. Han shoots second, killing Greedo.

    Everyone wins.

  47. Qui-Gonn Jinn by mr100percent · · Score: 2

    Maybe in Episode 6, we could see Qui-Gonn Jinn's ghost next to Yoda, Obi-Wan and Anakin.

    There might be a discrepancy, as I hear in the books that the ghost fades away into the force years later, Qui-Gonn might be too late...

    1. Re:Qui-Gonn Jinn by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "There might be a discrepancy, as I hear in the books that the ghost fades away into the force years later, Qui-Gonn might be too late... "

      Don't put any faith into the books, even if they are 'canon'. Lucas certainly doesn't care about them. According to some people I know (who should go outside more, btw :P), there are loads of inconsistencies if you factor the books in too.

      I wouldn't expect that little detail about 'Force Ghosts' has any bearing on the movie.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Qui-Gonn Jinn by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
      Maybe in Episode 6, we could see Qui-Gonn Jinn's ghost next to Yoda, Obi-Wan and Anakin.

      More likely, we'll see the actor who played the unmasked Vader replaced by Hayden Christiansen.

      I'm not averse to Lucas making references in 4-6 more concrete by using characters and actors from 1-3. I just don't see how JJB fits in. Maybe if somebody referred to him as "that blankety-blank who sold the Republic up the river". I guess it depends on how he's used in 3. Lucas must be keeping him around for a reason. Why make him a fool in 1 and a political patsy in 2, unless he's either redeemed by his actions or meets a brutal, audience-cathartic end in 3.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Qui-Gonn Jinn by Kredal · · Score: 2

      Qui-Gon didn't die in front of Luke, though. That's the only way you become a ghost... dying while Luke watches.

      Think about it.

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  48. Dear god, calm down by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

    The source is Harry Knowles at Aint It Cool News. We already had this debate. Harry has become(literally) a big fat troll who is far more concerned with having his jumbo sized ego stroked by Hollywood than with anything so trite as objectivity or accuracy. He'd happily report that Jar Jar skullfucks Aunt Beru if he thought it'd buy him another ounce of mystique and geek cachet.

    These aren't the spoilers you're looking for. You can go about your business. Move along.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  49. Contest: combined cut of all six episodes by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Now that people can make there "personal edits" on their home PCs (as several did the SW:TPM) using iMovie and the like, its only a matter of time before all six movies are cut together. You could rearange to your hearts content. Some ideas:
    (1) A collage of all the space and land chase scenes.
    (2) A collage of all the light saber battles.
    (3) Put all the character development in temproral order, though you may be hard pressed to assemble more than 15 minutes of this.
    (4) A tour of the star wars planets.
    (5) A tour of the star wars races.
    (6) A documentary on Jedi history.
    (7) A remake of Dune, since Lucas borrowed heavily from Herbert.

  50. Sequels to the Phantom Edit... by smackdotcom · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's face it, the moment "Attack of the Clones" hits the video market someone's going to be chopping out the annoying C-3PO "comedy" bits. Any changes that Lucas makes to the originals will find themselves weeded out just as quickly by the die-hard fans. Along those lines, I'd like to be the first to suggest the naming scheme for the impending fan edits:

    Episode I: The Phantom Edit

    Epidose II: Attack of the Edit

    Episode III: TBA

    Episode IV: A New Edit

    Episode V: The Edit Strikes Back

    Episode VI: The Return of the Edit

    And of course Portman is going to end up a glowing ghost beside Anakin, Obi-Wan and the little green dude. Heck, it wouldn't surprise me if Lucas digitally inserts (a suitably make-up aged) Hayden Christensen instead of the guy who's playing Anakin now. Long story short--don't worry about it. The technology is there and the devout Star Wars afficiandos (you know, the guys who make their own vacuum-formed stormtrooper armour?) will have a definitive FAN-tastic version circulating out on the Net before you know it.

    --

    In a world without walls, there is no need for Windows.

    1. Re:Sequels to the Phantom Edit... by flikx · · Score: 2

      If only Anakin had drawn a picture of Padme lying naked on a couch, we'd have the family video stores here in Utah editing it. (!)

      --
      One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  51. George won't do episode VII for sure... by antdude · · Score: 2

    You probably heard this one before. Just to be sure for those who haven't heard it... According to Dark Horizons news (5/29/2002), it said:

    Star Wars: Episode VII: After recent speculation based on what sounded like a misinterpreted quote, George Lucas has finally and clearly ruled out further adventures after 'Jedi'. Lucas told Infobeat that he had PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED the idea but has since canned it totally - "I thought it might be fun to bring Carrie (Fisher) and Mark (Hammill) and Harrison (Ford) back when they're 65 and make another movie with them. But I'm going to be over 60 when I finish this and it takes 10 years to do a trilogy. I'm not going to spend my last 10 years doing Star Wars".

    I am fine with the six movies. :)

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  52. I'm still trying to figure out.... by jgdobak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...What makes Natalie Portman so "hot."

    She's not, IMHO, as gorgeous as everyone makes her out to be. She has "Girl next door" appeal. That's about it. They ruined that by making her wear gratuitously and pointlessly slutty outfits in the film, instead of adding something to the feel of the movie by dressing her as the dignitary she supposedly is.

    Besides, being attractive doesn't make up for being terrible at acting. Her performance in Episode 2 was wooden, at best.

  53. SCENE: Alderaan... by MagikSlinger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jar-Jar and Bail Organa looking up at the ominous new star in the heavens.

    Jar-Jar: "Issa thata new moona, Bail Organa?"

    CUT TO Death Star interior as the Planet Pulverizer(TM) fires and hits Alderaan.

    CUT TO Jar-Jar binks being hidiously vaporized on Alderaan in a cruel twist of fate for giving the empire its power.

    So you see, people, it might not be that bad...

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  54. Not again... by surfcow · · Score: 2

    I guess we'll all have to run out and buy "Star Wars: A New Hope, Extra-Special Edition, Director's Cut". How many versions of the film are there now?

    Something's getting inserted somewhere all right.

    =brian

  55. Interesting copyright ramifications... by sterno · · Score: 2

    Here folks is a big argument for shorter term copyrights. George Lucas can now go back and alter the original Start Wars to include a major nude scene with Jar Jar, and then cease distribution of the older untouched edition. Eventually that original version will cease to be with no efforts to maintain it and archive it properly.

    If copyright was for a shorter period, the original star wars could be restored from existing copies and maintained. As it is now, large pieces of our cultural history can be easily left to decay on the cutting room floor because of the whims of the copyright owner, who in many cases is no longer the person that actually produced the work.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  56. There will be no 3rd trilogy by gaudior · · Score: 2

    That was never in the plans, even back in the seventies. Ain't gonna happen.

    1. Re:There will be no 3rd trilogy by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      I had a book, back in the day, which was about The Making of ESB, specifically the models, and there was an interview with GL in there which had him saying there would be 9 films, that the droids linked them together, that the middle 3 were made first because they had the most action in and were more "accessible" etc.

      Or did I dream it ?

      graspee

    2. Re:There will be no 3rd trilogy by gaudior · · Score: 2

      Ya know, I seem to remeber something like that, also. I don't think he ever actually scripted the whole story, as has been claimed. I'd be VERY surprised if the franchise survives episode 3, and the revisionism of 4 - 6. I suspect an acceleration of the weariness with the whole thing that many of us feel.

  57. The tighter you squeeze the franchise. . . . by Salgak1 · · Score: 3, Funny
    . . . the more fans will slip thorugh your fingers.

    Now, all we need is a CGI Peter Cushing with a CGI Lucas beard and flannel shirt. . . .

  58. Fixing Episode 2 by Animats · · Score: 2
    Episode 2 could be much improved with one simple change.

    • When Yoda enters the cave to deal with Dooku, Yoda just pulls out a blaster and shoots him.
  59. Special Effects by Krieger · · Score: 2

    Hell the "special effects" from the first three (IV, V and VI) are much better then the tripe that he's churning out now. Models make a much more real and gritty world, then the shiny silver spaceships he's using now. You don't suffer from the it's too clean to be in the picture obnoxious effect that CGI tends to have. That and models (the Rancor) tend to move correctly or at least better then computer models.

    1. Re:Special Effects by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      I haven't seen I or II yet (and probably won't), but I saw a snippet of the Yoda fight scene on the news last night. As soon as I saw that little man get angry and jump around and just immediately started laughing my ass off, and I don't believe that scene was intended to be comedy.

  60. Different versions on DVD? by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know if George Lucas would want to do this, but what if the DVD had all three versions (or at least the original and the newest with both sets of new stuff)? That way, our beloved original is not lost, but there's some fun added stuff.

    Would there be any harm in doing this?

    mark

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Different versions on DVD? by regen · · Score: 2

      It would probably work for Lucas as well since he could charge 3x as much.

    2. Re:Different versions on DVD? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Would there be any harm in doing this?

      You mean aside from the Slashdot article that will be posted slamming George Lucas for being so greedy as to "make us buy all three DVD sets."

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:Different versions on DVD? by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

      Oh... well I was thinking more along the lines of it being in the same DVD. There would just be certain places where the two movies were different, and DVDs are capable of diverging in that way.

      The gut feeling I had about this idea is that George wouldn't allow it. It seems like he wouldn't want to imply that any of his additions didn't improve on the original, because of his ego. Like, "why do you want to watch the original when I made it better?"

      Hard to say.

      mark

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    4. Re:Different versions on DVD? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 4, Funny
      Would there be any harm in doing this?

      Yes. To George's ego.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    5. Re:Different versions on DVD? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      10 ego==pocketbook
      20 GOTO BANK

  61. if and only if... by mblase · · Score: 2

    I can tolerate this on the condition that Lucas allows viewers to see the DVD in one of two ways: the original, unadulterated version and the "special/flashback" edition. As long as I have a choice about skipping the retconned scenes, I'll not complain.

  62. Changing history by praedor · · Score: 2

    Portman? OK, instead of inserting her into old movies, how about inserting her into my home? What a frickin' hottie.


    I don't see how it can be done. The first movies were futurama, presumably when Portmans character would be well aged...unless there is to be some sort of flashback stuff or goofy "the force" ghost stuff with a hot young Portman spook (ala the dead Obi-Wan and recently deceased Darth).


    As for Jar-Jar. If this thing makes it into anything else Star Warzy, then it will be due to Lucas demonstrating a true loss of touch with reality. I'd say this would prove beyond doubt that his creativity ended with the first trilogy and Alzhiemer's or presenile dementia has kicked in.


    Jar-Jar is the pinnacle of nasti-stupid characters created by Lucas. The other members of the STUPID-Ass, childish (OVERLY childish) characters would be the ridiculous Ewoks and then a just-out-of-diapers Anakin in Episode 1. Talk about foresaking real people that are past wearing poopie diapers and pandering to the Romper Room crowd.


    Hey Lucas, quite aiming at the Goo-goo-gaa-gaa set and aim HIGHER. Go no lower than the mid-teens (but skip the teen-beloved farting and barfing humor).


    Infants are not a worthy market but that seems to be all you shoot for - of course, they are the easiest to please and require the least amount of talent to amuse...


    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    1. Re:Changing history by happyclam · · Score: 2
      Infants are ... all you shoot for - of course, they are the easiest to please and require the least amount of talent to amuse.

      ...and have the longest expected life span and therefore the greatest lifetime customer value. And the most likely to whine incessantly so grandma buys the new action figure and plastic light saber flashlight.

      Speaking of incessant whining... let me get back to reading the other posts.

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  63. Re:Polymorphic movies by happyclam · · Score: 2

    In other news...

    • Disney will re-release Snow White to give Dopey a larger role and to make Snow White an Asian-American.
    • Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid will be re-released with five new scenes developing and exploring the poignant, touching love relationship between Butch and Sundance.
    • The entire Three Stooges collection will be rereleased to reduce the violence and focus more on the development of the characters based primarily on flashbacks to their childhood and their relationship with their parents.
    • The Sound of Music will be given three more musical scenes, including "Springtime for Hitler" performed by digital representations of a young Christopher Plummer and Julie Andrews.

    "Because they can!"

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  64. Some of us don't own VCRs by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

    I don't plan on getting one. My dvd player is way better, except that it won't play the old star wars videos (since they are on VHS). I guess that the responce to that is well, "buy a VCR you looser", but I don't want to so I guess I'll just have to deal with the new version on DVD, if I decide to buy it at all since I liked the original more then any of the newer versions. The new special edition wasn't that much better, and who knows about the as yet unreleased version. I'm not HC enough of a fan to get upset about this, but it would be nice if Lucas decided to stop changing things.
    If he really thinks that the movie should be changed, maybe he should just redo it then. It's not like it would be that expensive to redo, just time consuming.
    He believes in digital actors, just get the guys who did FF the movie to redo it with the original cast looking like they did 25 years ago. They are all still alive so they could redo the voices if lucas wanted to record a new soundtrack as well. (Or just reuse the old one... hehehe) But I digress.

  65. NP insert not a big deal. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Portman will probably just be stuck in as a 'ghost' at the end of ep4: return of the jedi, along with Aninken, Obiwan, and Yoda. Its probably not going to be a big deal.

    Otoh... puttting Jar jar in ANH? That just seems like a slap in the face...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  66. Re:Future is Now. And then. by medcalf · · Score: 2

    Ah, but will it be possible for me to edit years 21 and 22 out of my life retroactively?

    -jeff

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
  67. That does not follow by mblase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Many (not all) of us *do* want general freedom to modify the original films in this manner.

    We also want to have the choice of retaining the film in its original presentation.

    Lucas seems bent on changing the "Star Wars" movies a bit more with every major release so that the only way to get the original films may one day be to buy the VHS copies on eBay somewhere.

    Pfah to that. Not *everyone* wants to see the films "enhanced" with new footage, and I'd like to have the choice of not seeing it when I watch the film.

  68. Original, unedited sequels on DVD by skirch · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have been wondering lately if the original, unmodified versions of the sequels will be released on DVD. After reading reports like this one, it makes me very doubtful, and it makes me more disappointed in Lucas. There's something sacred about Star Wars, and he's been ruining it for a lot of us for the last 10 years. He needs to get over it and just move on with his life. Star Wars is what it is, and no matter how many fart jokes or computer-generated Jabbas you work into the old trilogy, it's still the same story. The constant tweaking to get "what he wanted to do originally but lacked the technology" (and in this case, the actress) doesn't add anything. The new stuff is just distracting. It upsets my stomach and makes me cringe.

    My brother was really into collecting movies before the advent of DVD, and somewhere along the line he grabbed laserdisc copies of The Star Wars trilogy. It's an awesome set, not the special edition. Not upgraded. If the non-special-edition movies aren't released on DVD, I'm really tempted to make a DVD copy of this set for my own use.

    Would it be legal since I already own the trilogy on VHS? Would it be legal for me to make a copy for a friend that owns the trilogy on VHS?

  69. From the get-a-clue dept. by bgarcia · · Score: 2
    from the historical-revisionism-stinks dept.
    Uh.... Chris?

    Hate to break it to you pal, but this whole Star Wars story...

    It's ___FICTION___!!!!!!!

    It didn't really happen long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away...

    --
    I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar.
  70. STAR WARS.NET by org.earth.Citizen · · Score: 2, Funny

    If Lucas is really out to tie up every loose end, then Star Wars will literally be a work in progress forever. To these ends, maybe Lucas should model Star Wars on .NET. You could buy a Star Wars subscription and every quarter you will be sent a SWAN (Star Wars addict Network) DVD pack, consisting of all 6 episodes with the latest patches and service packs applied, which fix plot and continuity errors. The first service pack will address why in the 10 years between TPM and AOTC, the Jedi/republic/Naboo did not buy Anakin's mom's freedom, especially after he saved Naboo.

  71. Nancy Drew by Eryq · · Score: 2

    I am told that the "Nancy Drew" books are (or once were) constantly being revised and updated to appeal to the current generation of readers.

    For example, some of the earlier ones were supposedly downright offensive to modern sensibilities w.r.t. how African American characters were treated (think pre-WWII movies and use your imagination).

    I'm not saying that this is right, or a good idea. Just that Lucas wouldn't be the first.

    --
    I'm a bloodsucking fiend! Look at my outfit!
  72. Not about copyright. by BlueFrog · · Score: 2, Informative
    There's a huge difference between supporting the public's rights to fair use, and wanting to emliminate copyright altogether. The current debate over copyright law centers on various partys' efforts to expand their rightful control over duplication to exert unrightful control over access.

    So, to bring us back to the topic at hand: I support Lucas' right to do whatevery he wants with his own movies. But in the case of the Holy Trilogy, I wish he'd refrain, and leave them just as they are. (Or give us the option to view the old versions.)

  73. Re:at last! by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 2

    I would feel the same way if I had the *choice* to get the original versions on dvd. I doubt that is what will happen though, as I don't think you can even get the orginal vhs versions anymore.

  74. c3po by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    Somewhere at home I have the original star wars novel, as written by George Lucas, and in there somewhere I swear that 3po mentions that he used to belong to Darth Vader.

    I remember when I read it going "huh???" but now it all makes sense - except the memory erasure.

  75. Re:While he's at it -- Whummmp-Whummp by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    Actually, if you read up on kendo, which is what the lightsaber styles of the first three movies are based on, you'll see that Kenobi's skills have improved to the point that he realizes that jumping around and swinging is useless. He's 'fighting for center.' But some of his brash recklessness shows through with the spin cuts. Watch him in TPM, and you'll see a poor fighter. "Hey, I've got an idea, I'll adopt a guard stance that involves holding a glowing rod right in front of my eyes!"

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  76. Rumors Source by shawnmelliott · · Score: 2

    After much searching on the internet.... 50 links and various popup ads I have found the source of the Rumor. it's....... Jon Katz

    Anybody whose read his last couple of articles ( hey, just being subjective here ) would agree there's definite motive for this kind of rumor.

  77. Remember the classics... by danro · · Score: 2

    My bet is that Anakin kills Dooku meaning to do good but ends up taking his place by Palpatines side.
    You know, the old "good intentions gone bad" plot...
    It would fit Palpatines caracter well too, remember that he later tries the same trick on Luke. Geting him to kill Anakin and take his place.

    As for Windu, he will probably be killed of in a down and dirty backstabbing (maybe even physically by Palpatine himself), or die last in a glorious "last stand of the Jedi" against Palpatines clone troopers. Personally I would like the former better, but I don't think Lucas can resist the "last stand" cliche.

    Joda will not kill anyone. It would be out of caracter for the "wise sensei"-type.

    Remember, Lucas is big on classic story themes, and the three I mentioned are common. Just check out any Greek tragedy or Shakespear play.
    Just my 0.02 kr...

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    1. Re:Remember the classics... by Zordak · · Score: 5, Funny
      As for Windu, he will probably be killed of in a down and dirty backstabbing (maybe even physically by Palpatine himself), or die last in a glorious "last stand of the Jedi" against Palpatines clone troopers. Personally I would like the former better, but I don't think Lucas can resist the "last stand" cliche.

      Actually, I got ahold of a bootleg copy of the script for EP III on the internet, and found this interesting little piece of dialog just before Mace Windu's death:

      Boba Fet: Hello, my name is Boba Fet. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

      Mace Windu: STOP SAYING THAT!!!

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    2. Re:Remember the classics... by Cplus · · Score: 2

      Not to be the guy that's too into this, but Samuel L. Jackson has publicly stated that he asked George Lucas to write an honourable end to Mace Windu. George apparently agreed.........can't picture Sam Jackson being cool about a backstabbing death. Mace has to die for something important.

      --
      "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
  78. How pathetic can you be ? by Augusto · · Score: 2

    George, why couldn't you have died in the 80s and left us imagining how great the movies could have been ?

    Wow, talk about being a totally lifeless loser ! Whishing somebody had died so his view of a movie wouldn't be screwed up. Oh man !

    How about this ? Don't see the new movies and the new releases, I'm sure you can buy tapes of the orinal movies and watch them all day so your world is not shattered !

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:How pathetic can you be ? by Augusto · · Score: 2

      George Lucas is a "used car salesman" that was once famous ? I don't know in what reality you lived, considering how much money the current movies are making and the 3rd one will make.

      Not only to mention that after A New Hope he was involved in a little thing called Indiana Jones, and among other little things, the creating the premier special effects house that is still the "one to beat".

      Not only that, but this "has been" as you seem to call him, is currently doing what no other studio would dare, which is to promote the use of digital recording and projection for a major motion picture. Yes, he didn't get the thousands of digital screens he wanted, but a lot more got installed just for his "little" movie.

      --

      - sigs are for wimps.
  79. Star Wars needs Service Packs by Picass0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So now every year or two you'll have to patch Star Wars to keep it current. SP1 will patch inconsistancies with caracter's memories, age, and correct lightsaber colors!

    1. Re:Star Wars needs Service Packs by Alsee · · Score: 2

      you'll have to patch Star Wars to keep it current. SP1 will patch inconsistancies with caracter's memories, age, and correct lightsaber colors!

      Yeah yeah yeah. Sigh.
      The first priority is always the eye-candy interface. As usual we have to wait for SP2 before they get around to patching the unchecked buffers and blank administrator password.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  80. I'm sorry, but look... by Artifex · · Score: 2

    The original movie has been out for 25 years, now.
    It makes sense to actually do a complete remake of it, in the hope that it will breathe new life into the story, and appeal to a new generation.

    If the remake sucks, well... we still have the original.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  81. R2-D2 by felipeal · · Score: 2

    Maybe he will also change the scene at the begining of ANH where Obi Wan tells Luke he had never seen that droid before:

    LUKE: Then the droid does belong to you.

    BEN: Don't seem to remember ever owning a droid. Very interesting...

    1. Re:R2-D2 by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Why?

      They haven't shown that Kenobi owns a droid.

      I think it's pretty commonly known that Lucas hadn't got all the stories straight before he started making the movie, but that particular line doesn't mess with the continuity.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  82. Re:King of the Almighty Dollar by nucal · · Score: 2
    It wouldn't be surprising if LUCass decides to redo the original trilogy.... again. It'd mean more green in his pockets. Consider: A New Hope (or just Star Wars as it was called back then), had a re-release in theaters just after it's original run. All three of the original films were re-released as 'special' editions in 1997, supposedly to hype the forthcoming prequel trilogy.

    Exactly ... I bought one set of tapes ("never to be released again"), only to have the version with Jabba the Hut added to "Episode IV" come out one month later. The only Star Wars item I'd even consider buying at this point is a bootleg of the Christmas Special .....

  83. Not 9 Movies. No, really. Just 6. by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in 1977, right after Star Wars became a huge hit, Lucas had said that he did indeed have the rest of the story more or less sketched out, and that he thought it would take 9 movies to do it. Heck, originally he wanted to put the entire Anakin cycle in ONE movie, but it was way too long. He wasn't expecting Star Wars to succeed, he just wanted to make a fun movie. Then it hit it big and he said, "Hmm..." Anyway, originally he thought it would take 9 movies, but a short while later he realized that he didn't have enough story for 9 -- 6 movies would do. Ever since then is the oft-repeated myth that there's going to be 3 more movies after Episode III finishes. If there are, it's not going to be part of the Anakin cycle (well, naturally, since Anakin dies in ROTJ).

    I don't discount the possibility that there could be more Star Wars movies after Episode III, but I personally don't think Lucas will want to put out the effort. Remember, he's going to be 61 years old when Episode 3 comes out, and productions of this magnitude take a huge amount of effort. I suppose he could act in more of a supervisory role and let someone else handle more of the day-to-day duties, but, the question of Lucas' talent aside, would such movies FEEL like "Star Wars"? Hard to see, the future is. Not to mention the fact that the story arc would be more or less unrelated to Eps. 1-6, and we probably wouldn't have the same emotional attachments we've formed with the characters we already know.

    It has occurred to me that an "interim" movie would be possible, something that takes place between episodes 3 and 4 (call it "Star Wars: Rise of the Empire" with no "Episode N" part) that bridges the 20-year gap... maybe giving some details of the Empire's atrocities, Luke and Leia's upbringings, maybe Han's background, etc. Just a thought of my own.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  84. You're just who Lucas is looking for by Wind_Walker · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I do not mean to offend you, but you're exactly the kind of Star Wars fan that Lucas wants. You'll take any shit that he puts on celluloid and eat it right up. Since you say "...I'll eat it up" I assume that means you'll buy the new version of his movies. Wow, another couple billion in his pocket. And if it sucks, then you'll still rent the video and see how bad it sucks; only about 200 million in his pocket.

    Oh, and calling Star Wars one of the most epic stories ever written is pathetic. Read some books for God's sake. Ever heard of The Illiad? The Odyssey? The Maha-Barata? Fucking BEOWULF, for God's sake! Get out more!

    1. Re:You're just who Lucas is looking for by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

      Hmm...interesting concept...defining something using its antonym. I suppose that Windows 98 is a secure operating system because unlike Linux it gets hacked a lot?

      Epics are fundamentally incredibly large stories, and Star Wars does fit the bill there. However, they are also so universal that they speak to all generations without change. While I'll agree that people of all ages like Star Wars, and history could eventually call it an epic, for the moment it is definitely contemporary.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  85. Damn! by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one that's reading this thread and thinking 'It's like Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back' all over again!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  86. And now by The+Cat · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the home office in Anchorage, Alaska, the TOP TEN PLACES TO ADD JAR-JAR IN EPISODE 4:

    10. Orbiting Tatooine in the opening scene.
    9. Sweeping the hallway on the Princess' ship right before the stormtroopers cut through the door
    8. In the first escape pod from the Princess' ship
    7. Standing behind Obi-Wan at the bar
    6. Under the table during Greedo and Han's conversation
    5. Admiring the Millenium Falcon from the doorway just prior to its departure
    4. Running a lemonade stand on Alderaan
    3. Last (almost) through the blast doors
    2. Porkins' co-pilot

    ..and the NUMBER ONE place for Jar-Jar in Episode 4:

    1. In the exhaust shaft!

  87. R2D2 Memory by bigdavex · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lucas also reportedly told E! Online that the reason droids C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader is because their memories have been wiped prior to the beginning of Episode IV, the original Star Wars movie. "[C-3P0's] memory system has been erased, and so has R2's," Lucas told the site. "So they don't remember anything from the first trilogy. I'm telling you something from Episode III, but I shouldn't be telling you that, but I think most of the fans already know that."

    That explains a lot. R2 doesn't fly in episodes 4-6 because he forgot he can.
    --
    -Dave
    1. Re:R2D2 Memory by kerrbear · · Score: 2

      That explains a lot. R2 doesn't fly in episodes 4-6 because he forgot he can.

      Yah, don't forget Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru have their memories erased as well- so they forget R2 and C3PO. Oh wait, Annakin has his memory erased too, so he doesnt think to look for his son on Tatooine. But no- that will interfere with the new Darth Vader clip inserted into Episode IV where he goes down to Tatooine to have a few drinks with his former owner. Etc. Etc. Bleh.

    2. Re:R2D2 Memory by soulsteal · · Score: 2
      Man, forget R2 and his flying lessons....

      Threepio has to re-learn over 6 million languages!

  88. Here's some additions what would help... IMHO by litewoheat · · Score: 2

    Replace the Emperor hologram in Empire with one done by the current actor, Ian somethingorother.

    Redub the Storm Trooper voices (and maybe even Boba Fett) using the new Clone Trooper/Jango voice.

    In ANH, add some Senate scenes including where Palpatine disbands the body.

    IN ROTJ, CGI in some Nemodians in the Emperor's entourage

  89. Caution: Nerds Overreacting by sg3000 · · Score: 2

    > Sci-fi Wire is reporting a couple rumors
    > about the changes being made to the
    > original Star Wars trilogy for its next release.
    > That being that Natalie Portman may be
    > being inserted into Episode VI: Return of the
    > Jedi and that universally reviled Jar Jar Binks

    This sounds a lot like the complaining people made when they heard N' Sync (or whoever the hell they were) was supposed to be in Episode II. I don't remember seeing them there, and if they were, it certainly didn't affect how I enjoyed the flick.

    Look, it's a movie, not the New Testament. If Lucas wants to change his movie -- it's his own decision.

    I for one would like to see IV-VI touched up a bit when it hits DVD. First, replace the actor playing the Emperor in V with the guy who plays him in I, II, and VI. Second, digitally remove the puppets from the cantina scene in IV and the puppets in VI. Third, get rid of the ewoks.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  90. Re:I knew it.... Star Wars XP - by CleverNickName · · Score: 2

    with new integrated scenses - they're part of the script, they can't be removed.

    Yeah, and the last 35 minutes of the movie is just a BSOD.

  91. Re:Just A Movie??!!! What are you saying? by cjpez · · Score: 2
    How right you are. A curse on me and my family for generations to come for such blasphemy! I shall go commit seppuku now.

    :)

  92. Re:John Williams is already altering the score. by Kredal · · Score: 2

    I kinda wondered about that. I thought it would have been better if Williams just used the "evil bad guy" theme from ANH in Episode 2, and just a hint of the Imperial March at the end of the credits...

    But I suppose changing ANH's score to include the march would work too. (:

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  93. Re:Not 9 Movies. No, really. Just 6. by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Informative
    As an addendum to the above post, here's a quote from the Star Wars FAQ on the official Star Wars website:
    # Episode VII and Beyond

    1. Wasn't Star Wars going to be nine or more parts? Will sequels be made set after Return of the Jedi?

    Early on in the saga's development, some thought was given to have a trilogy set after Return of the Jedi. George Lucas has long since changed his mind, and the entire Star Wars saga will now encompass six episodes, starting with The Phantom Menace, and ending with Return of the Jedi. There will be no future Star Wars films set after Return of the Jedi.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  94. Changes? Good, let me tell you why by chazzf · · Score: 2

    As I see, George Lucas is staring at a fundamental problem for his movies. Yes, his. They aren't mine, they aren't yours, they aren't even the MPAA's.

    The problem is that Trilogy 1 (I-III) and Trilogy 2 (IV-VI) occur in substantially different parts of the galaxy, with substantially different characters. Episode I and II have featured politicians, the fucking amazing artistry that is Coruscant, the Jedi Order, battle droids, massive factory worlds. Episodes IV through IV feature mainly military men, on both sides, a lot of backwaters, a few rare Force-users...does anyone else see a glaring problem?

    Let me first say, before this next section of my post, that Empire Strikes Back is my favorite of the series, followed by A New Hope and Attack of the Clones. But really, what there needs to be is something else tying the trilogies. Where is the galaxy from Episode II to be found in the original three? Nowhere. We never see Coruscant, or Naboo, or Kimono, Geneosis. Logically, we should see these places. The Emperor, such an important figure in the first three movies, is not even see until Episode VI, and is only hinted at before then. It was a good storytelling technique, until prequels that brought him to the forefront. These and many other issues need to be reconciled (if anything is to be changed at all, of course).

    For those that skipped to the bottom, the creation of the new trilogy has made the point of view of the old trilogy problematic. There, I've said it.

    ~Chazzf

    --
    No statement is true, not even this one.
  95. WARNING: AOTC SPOILER by danro · · Score: 2

    Not to mention the can-o'-whoopass count Dooku opens up on Obi One in AOTC.
    He survives not one, but two lightsabre slashes. And not only survives, he is not even maimed, lucking out with only superficial cuts.
    ...as opposed to a certain sith-lord-in-training who experience a sudden 10kg weight loss trying to save Obi Wan's ass.

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  96. Re:Candidates for new name by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

    or star trek vs babalon 5

    with 2 star wars characters in it.

    --
    Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  97. Re: Stupid Star Wars nerds - Triumph special (OT) by plone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you want a spoiler?
    You will die alone!

  98. I can see it now.. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 5, Funny



    Episode IV: Jar Jar steps in Jawa poo.

    Episode V: Jar Jar steps in Jabba the Hut's poo.

    Episode VI: Jar Jar steps in Ewok poo.

    I just think Lucas is trying to insert "poo" analogies in his films. Pretty soon, Vader will be re-dubbed to refer to his army of "stormpoopers". Han Solo will be encased in poop instead of carbonite, AT-ATs will step in poop, and and the climax of the saga will be when Vader gets unmasked, only to say "Poop, I am your faaaa-tha."

    Save The Planet - Nuke California,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  99. from email... by GoNINzo · · Score: 5, Funny
    There's going to be an extra scene included in the DVD release of EMPIRE STRIKES BACK coming up next year! Basically, it expands on the scene where Vader reveals his fatherhood to Luke, and ties up some loose ends created with the release of Episode 1.

    INT: BESPIN GANTRY - MOMENTS LATER:

    A furious lightsaber duel is underway. DARTH VADER is backing LUKE SKYWALKER towards the end of the gantry. A quick move by Vader, chops off Luke's hand! It goes spinning off into the ventilation shaft. Luke backs away. He looks around, but realizes there's nowhere to go but straight down.

    Darth Vader: Obi Wan never told you what happened to your father.
    Luke: He told me enough! He told me you killed him!
    Darth Vader: No... I am your father!
    Luke: No, it's not true! It's impossible.
    Darth Vader: Search your feelings... you know it to be true...
    Luke: NO!
    Darth Vader: Yes, it is true... and you know what else? You know that brass droid of yours?
    Luke: Threepio?
    Darth Vader: Yes... Threepio... I built him... when I was 7 years old...
    Luke: No...
    Darth Vader: Seven years old? And what have you done? Look at yourself, no hand, no job, and couldn't even levitate your own ship out of the swamp...
    Luke: I destroyed your precious Death Star!
    Darth Vader: When you were 20! When I was 10, I single-handedly destroyed a Trade Federation Droid Control ship!
    Luke: Well, it's not my fault...
    Darth Vader: Oh, here we go... "Poor me... my father never gave me what I wanted for my birthday... boo hoo, my daddy's the Dark Lord of the Sith... waahhh wahhh!"
    Luke: Shut up...
    Darth Vader: You're a slacker! By the time I was your age, I had exterminated the Jedi knights!
    Luke: I used to race my T-16 through Beggar's Canyon.
    Darth Vader: Oh, for the love of the Emperor... 10 years old, winner of the Boonta Eve Open... Only human to ever fly a Pod Racer... right here, baby!
    {Luke looks down the shaft. Takes a step towards it.}
    Darth Vader: I was wrong... You're not my kid... I don't know whose you are, but you sure ain't mine...
    {Luke takes a step off the platform, hesitates, then plunges down the shaft.}
    {Darth Vader looks after him.}
    Darth Vader: Get a haircut!

    --
    Gonzo Granzeau
    "Nothing the god of biomechanics wouldn't let you into heaven for.." -Roy Batty
    1. Re:from email... by Mark+Gordon · · Score: 2

      Now imagine that animated, with LEGO figures. Hmm... sounds vaguely familiar...

  100. No shit George by Rand+Race · · Score: 2
    Lucas also reportedly told E! Online that the reason droids C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader is because their memories have been wiped prior to the beginning of Episode IV, the original Star Wars movie. "[C-3P0's] memory system has been erased, and so has R2's,...


    Kinda obvious that. The question is: who wiped Obi-Wan's memory of them?

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  101. Obi-Wan Kenobi's memory wiped? by sessamoid · · Score: 2
    Lucas also reportedly told E! Online that the reason droids C-3P0 and R2-D2 have no memory of Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader is because their memories have been wiped prior to the beginning of Episode IV, the original Star Wars movie.

    I just finished watching ANH recently, and something odd occurred to me. I can buy Lucas' contention that the 'droids' memories were wiped prior to ANH, but that doesn't account for the fact that Ben Kenobi seems not to recognize the droids at all when they find him in the Tatooine desert. This is despite the fact that he spent some very pivotal moments in galactic history with those two. Is Lucas going to alter Episode IV to make up for this apparent gaffe as well?

    --
    "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
  102. How to add Padme to the original films by EvilBastard · · Score: 2

    At the end of the third film, when she's hiding Luke and Leia, she changes her name to from Padme Armidala to Mon Mothma.

    Leader of the Opposition becomes Leader of the Resistance. And there's enough similarity in appearance between the two of them to pull it off.

    There you go, she's in the films, no need for CGI-Inserts, retroactive continuity or re-releasing yet another special edition to try to beat ET's all time box office record.

    No wonder Lucas didn't think of it

  103. Episode III spoiler by jafac · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just got an email from George Lucas himself, asking me what I think of his proposed outline for Episode III (he said his outline for II finished up a week after filming started, we all know what a disaster that was, so he's trying to get a headstart on III).

    In III, it is 15 years later. The Clone Wars are in full swing. Chancellor Palpatine's "War on Secessionists" has killed many innocent people, but has failed to bring Count Dooku to justice.
    Amidala has secretly had Anakin's love babies - while Anakin has been called away to fight the "War on Secessionists" with his side kick ObiWan.

    Jar Jar accidentally flips the latch on Amidala's window in her high-rise as she leans on it to look out on the beatiful sunrise one morning (er - I wonder what Jar Jar was doing in Amidala's room in the early morning?). Anakin totally blows his top, and abandons his post, returning to Coruscant, he confronts Jar Jar, who admits that he was "doing" Amidala, and that Luke and Leia are really HIS. Anakin force-grabs Jar Jar, and lightsabers his arms and legs off, then shoves him out the same window, and before dropping him 5000 feet, tears his torso to shreds.

    In the meantime, ObiWan is instructed by Yoda to NOT confront Anakin, but instead, to protect Luke and Leia from his growing rage. So ObiWan successfully evades Anakin on Coruscant, abducts the children, and spirits them off to Bail Organa's home planet of Alderaan. To have him adopt them as the Jedi's ace in the hole against the growing menace of their loose cannon, Anakin.
    Anakin finds out and decides that the Jedi council is plotting against him, and needs to be destroyed. And so, he destroys them. Three escape. Yoda, Mace, and a new Jedi, Ell Ron Hubbardi played by John Travolta. A long hunting sequence plays out where Mace Windu and Ell Ron lead Anakin on a wild goose chase through the streets of Coruscant in a speeder, while Mace and Ell Ron philosophise about the meaning of life, the force, phenomenology, etc.

    While they stop for food at a "Space Denny's", Mace goes to the bathroom, and Anakin finally catches up to Ell Ron, and uses the Jedi Mind Trick (TM) to convince him that Mace is evil and that they should destroy eachother. Mace comes out of the bathroom, and they have the lightsaber duel to end all lightsaber duels. Properly disposed of, Anakin now ignores the two and pursues Yoda. But by now, the trail is cold, and he ends up on Alderaan, looking for the kids, so he can destroy them. ObiWan finds him first, and they duel nearly to the death, and Anakin is plunged into a volcano.

    Mace has destroyed Ell Ron Hubbardi, and it is in the remains of the shattered high-rise that was the Space Denny's that the emporer encounters him, all pissed off and shit. The emporer turns him to the dark side, and has him change his name to Darth Vader. The emporer says that he will tell everyone that Darth Vader is really Anakin, rescued from the Volcano, and rebuilt with off the shelf cyborg parts.

    Yoda catches up with Obi Wan, and tells him that they've got to change plans a bit, because having BOTH twins on Alderaan is a single-point of failure, so Obi Wan takes Luke to Tatooine, and sells him as a slave for a cheap hooker. Luke is eventually sold through several owners, who decide to get rid of him as soon as they find out how much he whines, until he ends up in the same fate as his grandmother Shmi. Eventually, Owen comes to love Luke and sets him free, and even stops molesting him - but continues to keep him on as a farmhand. Yoda, in the meantime, has hidden himself on Dagobah.

    Oh yeah, and one twist he wants to add.
    The Space Denny's actually gathers roadkill from all around Coruscant. People who have fallen out of windows, or their speeder's seatbelts weren't fastened, etc. And grinds them up as mystery meat. So Mace and Ell Ron were actually eating bits of Amidala and Jar Jar. And when Anakin stopped to warp Ell Ron's mind, he also took a bite of Mace's hamburger, containing bits of Amidala. In this way, Amidala's body became part of the force, and this is the route through which she becomes a ghost at the end of the re-made episode VI. Also, they'll have to reshoot the scenes where Vader takes off his mask in Episode V and VI (and his ghost scene at the end of VI) to replace him with Windu. This is also how Jar Jar's ghost ends up in Episode IV, because he was eaten by Mace, who was Darth Vader. Jar Jar's ghost will be in the scene where Obi Wan is killed, he'll tell Luke; "Luke! Meesa tink yoosa better get a runnin boss" - but he won't admit to being his true father, because that would present an obvious continutiy error with Episode V. In fact, it will never be revealed to Luke who his real father is, and when he pulls off Vader's mask at the end and sees that it's Mace, he'll chalk up the skin color difference to volcanic scorching or something.

    - - -
    I'm not sure what to say to George. I mean, I think he sent it to me by mistake - I actually opened it by mistake, because the subject line was "Enlarge your penis 500%!" -
    I think it's a great idea that hes getting a headstart, and I kind of like this better than where it looked like it was headed.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  104. If it comes down to that, I'll do us both by dswensen · · Score: 2

    I've spent more time than I like to think about defending Star Wars on Slashdot over the years, but if he puts Jar Jar in Episode IV, I'm going to drive out to Skywalker Ranch and throttle him with my bare hands.

    Even the most die-hard Star Wars sucker has his limits.

  105. Jar Jar Binks == Darth Sidious by ka9dgx · · Score: 2
    It's readily apparent to me that Jar Jar Binks == Darth Sidious. The evil is very cunning, playing everyone else for a fool with his apparently simpleton ways.

    --Mike--

    1. Re:Jar Jar Binks == Darth Sidious by euxneks · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Thatsa right, feel yousa angah! Strike meesa down and yousa path to duh dahk side will beesa complete!"


      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  106. Changes to Star Wars by totallygeek · · Score: 2
    I think that it is cool that the director is still interested in making his old movies change by revisiting them. Think of how many movies you can't get on VHS or DVD because the director and actors don't want to mess with them. It would be wonderful if these movies were touched up, fixed, or at least released -- especially some of the movies integral to the director or actors' careers.

  107. Other Rumored Changes by OneWeirdFish · · Score: 3, Funny

    Unfortunately, Lucas won't stop at the Special Edition. After the release of Episode III ("Ani, Get Your Gungan") he plans to go back and further modify the original trilogy. Here are a few other of the rumored changes straight from the brain of one weird Fish. Special Special Edition (2008). * Jar Jar is digitally inserted into every scene in Ep4, Ep5, and Ep6. * Stormtroopers carry walkie-talkies instead of blasters. (Hey, they never hit anything important anyway.) * Luke's haircut is made presentable, but now he looks like "Hanson." * Ian McDiarmid replaces Clive Revill in the Emperor-hologram scene in Ep5, except now is a CGI construct less believeable than bikini pinups of Lara Croft. * Han Solo's Special Edition line, "It's all right, I can see a lot better now" is replaced with "It's all right, I never had hibernation sickness, I was only fooling." * Aunt Beru's looped lines are redubbed by Fran Drescher. * The sweeping John Williams asteroid theme is replaced by the music from the 1979 arcade game "Asteroids." Ultra Special Special Edition (2012) * Chewbacca is digitally removed from every shot and replaced with Jar Jar Binks. Han Solo's line "It's not wise to upset a Wookiee" is replaced with "It's not wise to upset a Gungan." * Footage is added of Imperial Academy forces being trained in weapons use by Don Knotts. * Digital lip-sync technology is used to change Luke's line "Nooo-ooo-ooo-oooooo!" into "Yippee!" * To make it more obvious that Senator/Chancellor Palpatine is really the Emperor in disguise, a set of Groucho glasses is added to every shot of the Emperor. To every shot of Palpatine is added a halo. * The Wampa Ice Creature is now a cameo role played by Shaquille O'Neal, complete with musical number and dancing girls in skimpy fur bikinis. The scene goes on tour as the "Wampa Ice Capades." * The entire John Williams score is scrapped and replaced with Pink Floyd's "Dark Side of the Moon." Some fanboys claim it fits with spooky synchronicity in certain scenes, usually after the imbibement of several non-prescription herbal remedies. Incredibly Special Ultra Re-release Special Special Edition (2025) * Jar Jar Binks is made a Jedi Knight. * Jar Jar Binks destroys the Death Star. * Jar Jar Binks is shown to be a cunning and foresighted adversary who allowed himself to be manipulated by Palpatine into proposing legislation to create the Imperial Army. Says Jar Jar in Episode 2, "Revenge of Jar Jar," "Nowsa meesa has a eeeevil Emperor where meesa want!" * Luke Skywalker is digitally erased from the picture and replaced with a member of the 2025 Swedish Bikini Team. * C-3PO is re-dubbed by Dennis Franz, who plays the Brooklyn-born Lt. Sipowicz from "NYPD Blue." * R2-D2 is given the BFG from Doom XII and goes on a rampage in Cloud City to rescue C-3PO's disconnected parts. * Han Solo no longer accidentally activates Boba Fett's jetpack to send him careening into the Sarlacc Pit. Instead, Han indicates that Boba Fett's shoe is untied, whereupon the bounty hunter looks down, trips over his own foot, shoots himself in the neck, gets tangled up in his own grappling hook cord, and says "D'oh!" a la Homer Simpson. Fett then windmills his arms wildly on the edge of the skiff, falls into a batch of wet cement, and explodes with near-nuclear force. Han Solo then quips, "The fool! He doesn't even have shoelaces." * Governor Tarkin, Han Solo, and Jabba the Hutt replaced with an aging Mike Myers doing Dr. Evil, Austin Powers, and Fat Bastard, respectively. The Ewoks are replaced with Mini-Mes.

  108. Jedi Mind Tricks by Royster · · Score: 2

    /me waves a hand mysteriously.

    You remember Jar Jar and Amidala in Episode 3.

    I remember Jar Jar and Amidala in Episode 3.

    You cried when you were 10 and you saw Jar Jar die.

    I cried when I was 10 and I saw Jar Jar die.

    You love Jar Jar and will buy merchandise.

    I love Jar Jar and will buy merchandise.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  109. Re:Original Trilogy? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    Absolutely. Lucas is wrong. I have the original VHS 'uncorrected' releases of IV-V-VI and they define a cinematic language that is what made Lucas his money and got him his fame.

    Lucas wanted 'Phantom Menace' scale from the beginning, but he couldn't have it. From space battles to interiors, his budget spelled out constraints on sets, on effects: Mos Eisley spaceport was like 20 feet of wall, Cloud City was several lengths of corridor, in-fighter reaction shots were restricted to extreme close-ups with little or no external views visible: the budget and the technology was hugely restrictive.

    Through this limitation, Lucas produced BIG, CLEAR images that 'read' instantly, delivered the relevant story points without a single wasted visual element, and MOVED... both in the sense of a violent through-frame motion, and in terms of not lingering for a single wasted second over the effect as effect, but slamming past it to the next scene for a sense of headlong motion in terms of sheer film.

    And all the time, he only wanted to make 'Ben Hur' with droids- pull the camera back, linger and ogle the worlds of his fantasy.

    Well, now he can. And it sucks. And I'm taking good care of my old VHS tapes and pray they don't come to harm- because THAT was what made Lucas's legend. It's not what he wanted- that's boring. Cast of thousands, millions of worlds, billions of extras is boring. The synergy between this desire and the constraints of reality produced incredibly vivid, up-front, aggressive film, all because Lucas constantly wanted to cover up his failure to truly accomplish what HE wanted to see.

    I hope there are 70mm (even 35mm) prints out there of the original films, being stored safely, because Lucas is the worst possible saboteur of his own filmed legacy- not through selling out, but through trying to realize the actually-boring ambitions he'd had from the start.

  110. Yah, and Donald Trump is a great man, too by DThorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm so sick and tired of people associating success with talent. Success is driven by a huge number of variables - talent is just one of them. Brittany Spears is successful too - would you iconize her? Give me a break. In Lucas' defence, he did do a couple of good early films(THX and American Grafitti were good), so I think he was a capable director, even smart on occasion. However, he took that long hiatus from films for a reason - he hates doing it. Do you do a good job on things you hate? Over the last 30 years he's lost whatever directing and writing talent he had. Pathetic dialog, childish scenes, stunningly derivative visuals - you have the nerve to call his visual sense "amazing"?! Here's the films he visually stole from for AOTC - The Fifth Element(city car chase), Blade Runner(same sequence, when they come down to the bar), Waterworld/Dune(the hidden cloning planet), Gladiator(the arena scene), and Starship Troopers(the final apocalyptic battle scenes).

    There were indeed some mighty fine FX sequences done for this movie. It was a BAD film, however. It was bad because it was written and directed poorly - I know MacGregor, Lee and Jackson can act(although the lead was another issue!), so there's only two people you can blame - the writer or the director. Hmmm...who was that?

    And give me a break on the "visionary" stuff. If he hadn't made all the money he had in his early years(off American Grafitti and SW), then he would have gone bust after a year and no-one would have heard of him again. It was throwing more and more money at ILM that kept it going. If he hadn't of done it, then someone else would have. Period. Why do so many people worship money? There are hundreds, nay thousands of people over history that just kept pouring more and more money after something they thought was "neat". Some ended up being successful, and are "visionaries". Others died penniless and are "losers".

    You'd think the average Slashdotter would have a little less respect for corporate sucess as a measure of quality.

    DT

    1. Re:Yah, and Donald Trump is a great man, too by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      totally agree... well said

  111. Star wars is like microsoft by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    When they had no money, the quality was "better". As they progressively get more money, quality dives, to the point of purposefully going back and wrecking the few things they did have right in order to increase profits. Imagine Star wars Episode IV version 3.1B... if they had to re-release the movie 5 or 6 times to make all the necessary adjustments for the series to actually flow together. Imagine Star Wars controlling 45% of the movie market, fighting off monopoly lawsuits left and right, and a director that owns an island somewhere in a galaxy far far away...
    sir_haxalot

    --
    stuff |
  112. Um George can you explain this one away? by ShieldWolf · · Score: 2

    "[C-3P0's] memory system has been erased, and so has R2's," Lucas told the site. "So they don't remember anything from the first trilogy. I'm telling you something from Episode III, but I shouldn't be telling you that, but I think most of the fans already know that."

    What about Owen Lars?!?!?! He apparently worked with a droid named C-3PO for a few years and then doesn't recognize him 20 years later wtf???

    --
    just = (My)Opinion.toCents();
  113. So, he's going to fuck up the original Star Wars by dh003i · · Score: 2

    So, let me get this straight, not only is Lucas destroying the Star Wars legacy by the laughable Ep I and II (though Ep III may be better if he doesn't fuck up Darth Vader), but now, he's also going to destroy the original Star Wars by "redoing it"? This is turning into a more shameless franchise than Jaws was. And you don't see Spielbeg, now, more than a decade later, going back and trying to squeeze more money out of Jaws, do you? No. He certainly could justify it -- after all, modern special effects could make it look realistic by today's standards. But, because he has some class, he's chosen not to fuck with a good thing.

    Lucas, however, displays no such class.

    Star Wars IV - VI were brilliant, great movies. But lets face it, Lucas was a 3-hit wonder. What other movies has Lucas made that are worth watching? Certainly not Star Wars I or II.

  114. Re:dumb nerds is right.. by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

    True story: the original plan was to have an extended fight between the scimitar waving guy and Indy.

    Problem was, they filmed it outside the USA. American + bad water in third world = health problems.

    Apparently our Harry was on the set, creased over with an apparently critical impending fit of near-fatal diarrhoea.

    So, everyone's like, "OK, ready to shoot the extended very physical scene we rehearsed in LA?" and Harry's got a case of quivering sphincter that's about to hit Defcon III. So he walks up to the stunt monkey and says "look, do me a favour, no matter what happens, just play along." So they yell "Action" and Harrison pulls the gun, fires, the other guy drops, the director yells "CUT!" and Harrison takes off for the john at Mach 4.

    Turns out, they loved the ad-lib when they watched the rushes, and chose not to reschedule the scene. Just think, if it wasn't for intestinal parasites and Montezuma's revenge, that scene would never have been.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  115. A new movie guideline by Phartx2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Today I declare that Natalie Portman should be in every movie produced from this day forward!

    (the masses rejoice)

    -Jim

  116. Excuse me! by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I think you're way off base. That should be "bloated meglomanic and the huge, critical fanbase that throws money at him."

    Which really makes it all the more interesting.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  117. Re:Nine movies as far back as Empire... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

    I disagree- if you look at Kenobi's face when he tells Luke about the death of his father (in the scene in Ben's hut) he looks like he is hiding something. Watch it again, you'll see what I mean.

    graspee

  118. Cheap way to extend copyright forever by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Every time you release an altered version of a previously copyrighted work, you can claim a NEW copyright. So if ANH gets re-edited and re-released in 2002, it gets a fresh copyright date -- 2002 -- without having to actually be a new work from scratch.

    I'm not sure of the legal standing of this wrt to the original version, but for practical purposes it's probably effective as a method to extend copyright forever.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:Cheap way to extend copyright forever by Reziac · · Score: 2

      True... but I think where this is ultimately headed is that eventually (and it may take decades to get there) there will be NO privately held copyrights -- copyright will be strictly a corporate concept, and ALL privately-created works that expect to get paid for it will be considered "works for hire".

      It sucks, but that's clearly what the **AA are aiming to achieve.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  119. Re:Lucas is a flamin genius by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

    The motivation was to create a slapstick character that would appeal to very small children, people who are stoned, and the Japanese.

    Someone should get Jar Jar a role on the Teletubbies, that would be perfect.

    --

    "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

  120. Re:While he's at it -- Whummmp-Whummp by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    Actually, I'm suggesting just that. I was deeply disturbed by the lack of using the force to do ANYTHING in TPM and ATOC. I think that in Episode 3, you'll see Kenobi finally defeat Dooku.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  121. Re:And (roughly) 50 years later... by matrix29 · · Score: 2

    You're way off. Episode I takes place 32 years before A New Hope; Episode II, 22 years; Episode III, 20. Adding 50 years would put you somewhere around the Corellian Trilogy or the Hand of Thrawn Duology.

    Excuse me for going fanboy here, but this is in a "Galaxy far far away". Who says the completely identical to humans but not actually humans people age at the same rate we do. And if there is a technology level akin to our current level, there is no real reason to have them age at all. But that is another rant for another time in a non-George Lucas / meta-fucked retcon universe.

    --
    "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  122. Oh, please! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2
    Padme is dead - Leia tells Luke that her natural mother died when Leia was very young. Jar-Jar dies in the next movie, I'm sure. I'm not a Jar-Jar basher; it's just how I see the story coming about:

    Obi-wan, with pregnant Padme in tow, is running away from a pre-armored Darth Vader. Jar-Jar's optimism, and just general childishness, comes into play and he tries to talk, Gungan to man, to Vader...and Vader cuts him down in cold blood. I think, once the next movie is over, we will all be thankful that TPM was as light as it was...

    My predictions for added scenes/shots? Bail Organa (Jimmy Smits) on Alderaan just before it is destroyed, and Qui-gon Jinn being dropped into the end of ROTJ alongside Anakin, Yoda and Obi-wan.

    When will they be released? I suspect 2007, the 30th anniversary of the first movie. I can see TPM in February, AOTC in March, III in April, ANH in May (the true 30th ann.), ESB in June, ROTJ in July. Then the full set, at least two discs per movie (plus two or three bonus discs) released in a DVD box set in October or November of 2007.

    And then, I think, that will be it. Lucas will move on to other things and the stories will be done...

  123. Rumours... by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Look. These are rumours, which originate on Aint It Cool News - or as an SF journalist of my acquaintance calls it, "Ain't It Complete Shit Harry Just Made Up".

    Talk to me when the DVDs are actually released...

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  124. Re:This could work out well... by gaudior · · Score: 2
    poor acting--even from the good actors

    George Lucas should NOT be allowed to write dialogue (deeply, truly love you), or direct actors, ever again. It's the worst part of the last 2 movies. He doesn't know how to make us care about these people.

    The only really good acting was from Count Sarumann, uh, Dooku, and that was mainly the result of Christopher Lee playing himself. I really expected him to point at Anakin and spin him around, just off the ground.

    I love Samuel L. Jackson, but it's been 2 movies in a row where he hasn't had ANY dialogue to work with.

  125. Originals only on VHS? NOT! Try some LD action. by fallen1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know I'm posting way late and I know there is no hope for modding up but I had to comment on the error in this post, to wit: The _original_ films now only exist as worn VHS tapes. You are most incorrect as they also exist in digital form via LaserDisc and I for one am very happy I have all three in their unedited, unchanged, unaltered format.

    --

    Dream as if you'll live forever.
    Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
    ~Anonymous~

  126. Lucas Interview on www.audible.com by doublem · · Score: 2

    YES! This is the one and only way I would like to see Jar-Jar added to "A New Home."

    Burn the &(*$ to a crisp. YES! DIE JAR-JAR DIE!

    www.audible.com has an interview with Lucas (Robin Williams conducts the interview) in the "free" section where he talks about why Jar-Jar is so hated. He snorts and says "Fans don't like comic side kicks. They hated C3PO and they hated Yoda." He makes it pretty clear that he sees the Jar-Jar haters as being low life scum unworthy of licking the bantha dung off his shoe.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  127. You need to chill. by digitalunity · · Score: 2

    You seem to have had a raw nerve hit. You know, abusers and abusees may have found that comment offensive. Just as alcoholics find beer in their face offensive. But you need to realize that it is *you* with the problem, not everyone else. If that post made your hair stand up straight, you need to take some time to think about why.

    You have issues buddy.

    Go seek professional psychiatric assistance immediately.

    --
    You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    1. Re:You need to chill. by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      Right, I've got issues. And would you care to elaborate on how you reached that conclusion? Do you know my history or my story? Do you know the people that I know? Who apointed you God? No, the original post of this thread was in immensely poor taste. But just as the original poster had a right to post, so I had a right to respond. And just as I made no judgements of the original poster, so you should not make judgements of me.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    2. Re:You need to chill. by digitalunity · · Score: 2

      I don't have to know your history, or your family or friends. I'm not god. Heres a little history from my point of view:

      I'm a waiter when I'm not coding C++. By company rules, I must present a bottle of wine when I greet the guest. Do you realize how many AA customers I get who seriously freak out because I brought the wine; even if I don't even present or mention the wine and I'm just holding it. They try to give me their entire story about how it is personally offensive to them.

      *I DON'T CARE*

      Don't want any, just say 'no thank you'.

      How was the original post in poor taste? He was noting the similarity between geeks and battered wives. They often DO return to the batterer. That's a fact.

      --
      You can't legislate goodness. Let each to his own destiny, by will of his freely made choices.
    3. Re:You need to chill. by MoneyT · · Score: 2

      The fact of the matter is, the subject of battery is a rather sensitive subject to a lot of people, and to liken it to a Star Wars geek not caring whether the dialouge was bad or not was not in my opinion in good taste.

      You missed my point though. The point I was making was you attacked me directly, claiming that I was in need of professional help, and you somehow reached this conclusion by the simple fact that I found (and stated my opinion) that the original post was in poor taste.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  128. Re:And destroying the original by ParticleGirl · · Score: 2

    Now watch tapes of the original version of the trilogy shoot up to $200 on eBay.

    That's the point-- I don't have to. I own them. I saw them, I wanted them, I got them, and now I don't need to worry about changes. I hear a random song I like on the radio, I get a copy before the remix is the only version available or the band fades from view.

    Those people who wanted the original version and always assumed they'd have it available to them are the ones that are at fault here. Not Lucas, who has every right to release whatever version he'd like, or not disseminate something that he has a copyright to. Someday the copyright is supposed to end and this will all be public domain, and then it will be freely available. Until then, if you want indefinite access to something that could potentially be altered, it's your own responsibility to go ensure that you'll have it.

    Maybe that means either buying a copy of something you enjoy and will want to see/hear/experience in the future, or buying a VCR and taping it from tv.

    --
    Do something about world hunger. Click here
  129. Re:I knew it.... Star Wars XP - by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
    • the last 35 minutes of the movie is just a BSOD

    I'd rather it had a scene with you in your Chewbacca costume. For some reason, I can't get that image out of my head, and it's deeply disturbing me.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.