Slashdot Mirror


What's It Like to be Google's Boss Techie?

We'd like to welcome Google Director of Technology Craig Silverstein as our next Slashdot interview victim... err... guest. You think you run a big Linux server farm? Craig's is bigger. Think your Web site gets a lot of traffic and creates a lot of headaches? Just think what Craig must face! Post whatever you'd like to ask Craig below, one question per post. About 24 hours after this runs we'll email Craig 10 of the highest-moderated questions, and we'll post his answers shortly after he gets them back to us.

228 of 657 comments (clear)

  1. I've wondered by lblack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google always seem to be early-to-market with some really highly developed software solutions, and also always seems to have the backbone to support them.

    I'm curious -- what drives the innovation? Is it the hardware team advancing architecture to permit the software team more room to play, or is it the software team saying, "Hey, look what we got!" and the hardware team dropping the iron to implement it?

    I understand there must be some level of synergy, but is it completely seamless or is one side of the equation effectively driving the other?

    Leem

  2. Simple question by lwdupont · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What type of machines/setup does Google use?

    (I've heard thousands of PC's with everything in RAM, but I'd love to hear it from the horses mouth)

    1. Re:Simple question by ender81b · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Addendum:
      How much bandwith you guys use/have?

    2. Re:Simple question by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      addendum addendum:
      How much does that cost a month?

    3. Re:Simple question by Pedrito · · Score: 2

      How about I give you the answer now. Google has around 10,000 rack-mount servers. They're 1U rackables with 2 independent servers inside, w/256MB of RAM and 80GB hard drives. The systems are made by Rackable Systems and King Star Computer.

    4. Re:Simple question by Electrum · · Score: 2

      It gets a lot cheaper when you buy more. We had four OC3's (OC12 equivalent) from AT&T and were paying $175,000 a month (though we also had a CTO with awesome bargaining skills).

    5. Re:Simple question by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How much bandwith you guys use/have?

      Addaddendum:

      How much of that BW is actually used and how does it vary during with the time of day and day of week?

      What's the ratio of traffic to and from user queries compared with the traffic searching the web and do you expect to scale indefinitely as growth continues on the current path?

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    6. Re:Simple question by Alan · · Score: 2

      Addendum^3
      Are you guys making money? The cost of the huge amount of infastructure in bandwidth and hardware must be huge, and while I've heard of a few different paths of revenue income (custom installs/setups, and the text ads) is it profitable for you yet?

  3. Statistics by suwain_2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A relatively simple, non-intellectual question, but I've always wondered -- just how many hits/how much bandwidth do you consume, and how many servers do you have to handle the load.

    --
    ________________________________________________
    suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    1. Re:Statistics by Pedrito · · Score: 5, Informative

      Check out this to get most of your answers. Shouldn't we be asking him stuff that isn't sitting on their website?

  4. Favoring Big Guys by PenguinRadio · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does google's policy of "ranking" the sites that have hits favor the "big guys" over more specific smaller traffic websites? That is, would a story on a site like CNN get a higher ranking in google on a keyword "Gulf War" than say a site (gulfwarveterans.com) that deals 100% with the Gulf War? Do you think you are leading to the commercialization of the web (i.e. the big power players) over smaller sites?

    1. Re:Favoring Big Guys by killmenow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Furthermore, estimates are that search engines miss a large portion of Internet content available. There must be literally millions of web pages that don't even show up in your cache because they are too small, or because nobody links to them. But there may be a site out there that has all the information you could ever want to know about some esoteric topic that only the person who created the site and the few friends that person may have...but since nobody else links to it, nobody else knows about it.

      So how do you find those treasure troves? And how do you decide which ones are treasure troves and which ones are the millions of "all about me" web pages? Or do you care?

    2. Re:Favoring Big Guys by jesser · · Score: 2

      So how do you find those treasure troves?

      1. Record URLs visited by Google Toolbar users. Google's Privacy Policy for their toolbar seems to allow this.

      2. Get Earthlink to record all URLs visited by Earthlink users and put that database in a format that Googlebot understands.

      3. Get Dreamhost to let Google index directories even where index.html exists. Let Dreamhost call the feature "[x] Submit all pages on www.squarefree.com to Google once a month" or "[x] Allow Google to find unlinked pages". Make it optional so that rare pages protected by "javascript passwords" can remain unindexed, but enable it by defalt.

      4. Give Google users a place to upload their browser history files and say the information will only be used to find unindexed pages.

      5. Don't worry about it, since unlinked pages will rank poorly anyway, and are likely to be old versions of pages that were renamed but not deleted.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
  5. Windependence Day by scubacuda · · Score: 3
    What are YOU doing for Windependence Day?

    1. Re:Windependence Day by jesser · · Score: 2

      They could have a penguin among the animals waving the American flag around the Google logo. I don't expect Google to do anything, though. It's too bad the Windependence Day people chose July 4, since they get mentally grouped with all the corporations abusing the American flag in ads and product labels since September.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
  6. I'm not sure when the change took place by SquadBoy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but I noticed a few months ago that Cisco now uses the Google engine to search the CCO. Congrats on that one. I've also noticed this new search box that Google is starting to produce. And it looks *very* cool. So my question is basically which is more important to your job the website or selling the service and the engine to people who need it?

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    1. Re:I'm not sure when the change took place by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Exactly. If Google's search engine sucks, no one will buy their intranet search appliance. If it's the best search engine on the web, the search appliance is probably similar high quality.

  7. Pigeon Computing by Black+Aardvark+House · · Score: 4, Funny

    Has there been any progress on the Pigeon Computing initiative?

    --

    I am the evil aardvark!

  8. technetcast.ddj.com/ by rblackwe · · Score: 3, Informative

    A little old but interesting.

    The Technology Behind Google 2000-10-19 (1hr 13min) By Jim Reese, Chief Operations Engineer, Google. How to build an internet search engine that indexes 1-2 terabytes of data 200 million web pages- and serves it up at a rate of 1000 requests/second. (Hint: Start with a farm of 10,000+ Linux servers). The technology behind Google: company overview, search parameters and results, hardware and query load balancing, Linux cluster topology, scalability, fault tolerance, and more. [420]

    http://technetcast.ddj.com/tnc_search.html?key=g oo gle.

  9. Why did you chose Linux? by RinkSpringer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am wondering why they chose Linux. Specifically, I wonder how they made the choice between all major OS-es (Linux, *BSD, Solaris and possibly Windows), as well as the software they use to power the site.

    1. Re:Why did you chose Linux? by skotte · · Score: 3, Informative

      i was wondering this myself. more accurately, i was wondering if they now wish they had gone with something else.

      fFollow me a moment. it is certain to be cheaper to setup a thousand computers of linux, rather than, lets say, a dozen computers of windows. licensing is just out of this world. but what about now? 100,000 machines later, several years down the road, heavily entrenched in linux, do you, Craig Silverstein, wish you had a different platform? would it, at this point, be more convenient to have something else, if you could change it all in an instant?

  10. Regression by Have+Blue · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Internet is always described as a distributed system with no single point of failure. Google, however, has quickly become by far the most popular method of locating information. "Surfing" has been killed with modern search technology, it's so much easier to look through Google than the Web itself. If Google was down, I'm sure the Internet would be far less useful.

    Do you think Google has become an Internet point of failure? With the competition for larger and larger indexes, is the Internet becoming centralized? Do you think this is a bad thing?

    1. Re:Regression by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2
      Google can only stay at the top if if continually improves its technology. There are others nipping at Google's heels, and sooner or later they will provide similar results as Google now provides.


      But what if the search engine business really is unprofitable? Would you pay to keep something like Google around? If so, how much, and how would you pay?

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    2. Re:Regression by skt · · Score: 2

      > I think that if Google shutdown... I would be utterly lost and helpless

      uh, there is always yahoo :)

    3. Re:Regression by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Yeah, for which you now have to pay to get included, provides no caches, and is so bloated and commercialized it's hard to tell what's a search result and what's an ad.

      I think I'll keep Google.

  11. Search engine spammers by I+Want+GNU! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What are you doing to prevent the new generation of more sophisticated search engine spammers- spammers that use advanced software such as WebPosition Pro, spammers that feed fake pages to the Google crawler, spammers that make bogus link pages to their own sites? Doesn't this new level of sophistication on their part mean that in large part Google must emphasize human website reviewers, such as those provided by the Open Directory Project, to a greater degree?

    1. Re:Search engine spammers by I+Want+GNU! · · Score: 2

      Yes, I am very familiar with the ODP and the fact that Google's directory is made up of ODP sites and that it weights these heavily (possibly partly due to the fact that the pagerank will be increased since ODP links are all over the web on sites that use its data). I just was wondering if Google's bond with projects such as the ODP would be strengthened and enhanced due to these recent issues that have made it impossible to do everything automatically. If it runs purely on robots and fixed rules, its rules will be tested and broken by people submitting automatic queries and using other sophisticated methods.

  12. Stumped by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a new network configuration guy, I am often stumped by a problem. I usually turn to google first, and my supervisor second. What has been the biggest problem that you have dealt with that will stand out in your mind years from now? As the "Head Techie", where did you turn, and what was the eventual resolution?

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    1. Re:Stumped by ralmeida · · Score: 5, Funny

      I just pictured Google engineers turning to Google to fix some kind of problem that they might have... if we could kill the middleman, Google would achieve consciousness!

      --
      This space left intentionally blank.
  13. I got one by bravehamster · · Score: 2, Funny
    Who gets to clean up after the pigeons?

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
  14. Scientology by ender81b · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does google plan on releasing more products like the Google Search Appliance in the near future - specifically those that are geared more towards the consumer level rather than business market? I would, personally, love to have some sort of google search engine on my machine to rummage through all the stuff I have. Does google plan on expanding into this market or will you remain focused on the web?

    I know, I know, Only one question but - it begs to be asked - how well is your technology going to be able to scale? Considering the near-expotential growth of the internet will PageRank be able to keep up?

    1. Re:Scientology by cybercuzco · · Score: 2

      Well first of all, why is the title of this questions scientology? Secondly, find in windows really sucks, I know, it takes like 15 minutes to just do a name search in a 5 gig hd. Try out sherlock on a mac sometime, you can search massive hds in seconds, it really kicks ass.

      --

    2. Re:Scientology by ender81b · · Score: 2

      I was originally going to ask a scientology question, but changed my mind and forgot to change the topic. =)

  15. Storage used by Steffan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I understand that Google was using large numbers of IDE drives in lieu of more expensive but individually faster SCSI devices. What prompted the decision, and how have the concerns of reliability and performance been mitigated. What special technology, if any, was used to implement such a system

  16. I'm curious... by rgoer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...as to what exactly Google does with the concepts it receives through the various Google-tech contests held. Have these ideas been made good use of? Do we see any of this in the Google we use every day? What about the ones that didn't win, do we see any of them?

  17. Question 1 of 2: Language of choice? by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Whats the google language of choice for web page building. I'd assume speed is the most important, so what language makes google so fast?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  18. Creative Ideas by Domasi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is there anything new that Google is working on that is not currently displayed in your labs section? If so could you explain it to us?


    --
    If you could sum it up in a nutshell, maybe you should be writing O'Reily books. --- Domasi 2001
  19. Success by discstickers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google's success has been well documented. Quick, relevant results are it's trademarks. Do you see any backlash against Google and what are you doing about people that use Google's success for their own purposes (ie Google bombing)?

    --
    I have a shitty sig!
  20. On call? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi Craig. Google is my favorite search engine, mostly because it's so simple, fast, and has a very professional feel.

    I wonder, when you're in charge of something as huge as Google, are you on call 24/7 in case something goes wrong? Have you ever been called during, say, a nice dinner, or worse, in the middle of the night? Thanks.

    1. Re:On call? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2

      Alright, dude... So you got a Civic. That, in and of itself, is not a crime.

      But for the love of God, man, please don't lower it, put an exhaust tip the size of a coffee can on it, or a spoiler that makes it look like a shopping cart, or a bunch of Japanese lettering on the front fender and part of the hood, or racing stripes, or aircowls all over the body that don't actually lead anywhere, or a bunch of ground effects, or tail lights that look like head lights mounted on the wrong end of the car, or a triple subwoofer with a 3000 watt amp so we can hear your car vibrating itself apart all the way down the street, or any of the other 10,000 stupid things that rice boys spend $30,000 on to make their cars look fast and sound really stupid and annoying.

      We've already got too many of those ugly pieces of trash on the roads. If you wanna go fast, spend $2000 on an old car, like a Nova, Chevelle, Camaro (Chevy's), GTO (Pontiac), GS (Buick), Mustang (Ford) or Barracuda (Mopar) from the late 60's to early 70's, and spend $5,000 to make it haul ass. Girls actually wave at guys driving cars like this. (I swear to God!)

  21. peer pressure by seanw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    as Google got more popular and eventually reached the status it holds today, did you feel any pressure (either internally or from outside the organization) to switch from a Linux based cluster to a proprietary solution (Windows comes to mind, but there are others). Where you (or others at Google) affected by any of the FUD that is put out, and did it affect your perception of Linux as a viable solution?

  22. so... by RogueProtoKol · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... what linux distrubution does the world's largest server farm use?

  23. Academic ties by dallen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems that Google's great successs is partly due to research coming out of the academic world. How many google employees have advanced degrees, and can they publish non-proprietry research after they join Google? How do you see the interplay between high-tech and Academia?

    1. Re:Academic ties by ender81b · · Score: 3, Interesting

      from g00gles site:
      Approximate number of employees: 400
      Ph.D.s on staff: 50+
      Languages spoken: 34
      Number of roller hockey players: 32
      Number of offices worldwide: 12
      Massage Therapists: 2
      Neurosurgeons: 1

  24. DB Backend by axehind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What type of Database backend do you use and what led google to choose it?

    1. Re:DB Backend by gregfortune · · Score: 2

      And how in the world does it work? That's gotta be a huge amount of data to store. Is the database distributed in some way? Are you doing something like a decentralized distributed hash table for data lookup or using a traditional relational database? And, how much data is stored as of today and how fast is it growing?

  25. Question 2 of 2: Browser Stats by FortKnox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since sites like slashdot don't like to give out their statistics, I'd like to ask, what percent of users use what web browser? Also, what percent of users use what OS?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Question 2 of 2: Browser Stats by glh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Josh, you can check the Zeitgeist to get the info on browser stats for a year span, same goes for OS-

      http://www.google.com/press/zeitgeist.html

  26. Linguistics and Searching by mshomphe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Does Google use any natural language processing (when dealing with web pages, queries, etc.)? Are you planning on doing more with NLP in the future?

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  27. Dream system by binaryDigit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hypothetical, and hopefully fun, question.

    Now assuming you had an infinite IT budget, generally which configuration of hardware/os (e.g. PC/Linux, PC/Win (boo hiss), IBM/AIX, VAX/VMS, Cray/Unicos, etc) would you adopt and why. More specifically, if pure performance were the only consideration, which would it be. Alternatively, if uptime were the primary consideration, which would it be.

    Be honest and don't worry about the bias's of your audience.

  28. CO$ and Deep Linking by Xaoswolf · · Score: 5, Interesting
    There have recently been several cases where people have sued because of the act of deep linking, or in the case of the Church of Scientology and Xenu.net, linking to information on other people's pages that someone claims a copyright to.

    How have these affected you and your job, and what are you feelings on this subject?

    1. Re:CO$ and Deep Linking by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2

      But, as he is incharge of the technology, he would also be in charge of the people that set up the links for google. His job would aslo be affected by the CO$'s actions.

  29. What kind of bandwidth/pipes/networking setup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What kind of bandwidth/pipes/networking setup do you use -- and how does your "macro" capacity diffuse down to each clustered server?

    Basically, what's your setup and how does it work?

  30. Logo work? by Xafloc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have but one question... Who is the mastermind behind all the "special" logo changes that Google experiences throughout the year?

    My hats off to that team!

    --
    -= Xafloc =-
    alinuxbox.com
    N
    1. Re:Logo work? by gblues · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you want to know more about the special logos (referred to as "Google doodles"), as well as see an archive of the Google doodles over the years, go here.

      Nathan

  31. Competitive by scubacuda · · Score: 2

    How has Google remained competitive?

  32. Google and IP address. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why in this day and age does google continue to penalize sites that are virtual hosted? With ip addresses becoming harder to get/justify every day why does google discount the relevance of links that don't come from a unique ip address. Please don't just deny it, I think the Internet community deserves an explanation.

  33. Question - Google's first programming contest by PK_ERTW · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google recently ran it's "first annual programming contest," with a winner receiving $10,000. Many slashdotters suspect this was simply a way to recruit new talent. So, was finding new people one of the initial goals for this project, and have you hired any new programmers as a direct result of it? What were the other goals (PR, generation of new ideas, etc) where there?

    --
    Engineers arn't boring people, we just get excited about boring things.
  34. As a market leader... by Marx_Mrvelous · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's well known that you use Linux in your mega clusters. I was wondering if you have ever been approached by Microsoft, Sun, or HP in an effort to switch to their proprietary OSes.

    I can't imagine that you haven't. It must have been a huge decision to invest in one technology, so are you satisfied with what you have?

    --

    Moderation: Put your hand inside the puppet head!
  35. Does size really matter? by scubacuda · · Score: 4, Interesting
    How do you feel about Alltheweb.com having a bigger index?

    1. Re:Does size really matter? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      I don't understand how they can have a bigger index -- google's bot regularly hits the sites that I have access to the weblog on, but alltheweb's doesn't.

      Maybe alltheweb is just out of date, and only indexes things once?

  36. 'Web Indexing companies" by RembrandtX · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Recently, the english division of our company [black and decker] hired 'HyperMedia Trafficing' or some other similar named company to get them 'more exposure' in the search engines.

    [forget the ethical debate about that .. or why no one bothered to ask me what to do.]

    What I want to know, is - going fowards - as more and more of these companies start up, and discover more and more unscrupulious ways of 'loading' the search engines with bogus hits/visits/data/etc. .. How does Google plan to make sure they are :

    1) Not loosing ad $$ to these folks
    and
    2) prefenting every search from returning something like www.hotgrannysex.com or www.top50.com as the 1st (or first 15) results for a search on .. well .. pretty much anything.

    --

    --Ne auderis delere orbem rigidum meum, non erravi pernicose!
  37. Forget Craig by Talisman · · Score: 4, Funny

    No offense to Mr. Silverstein, but I'm much more interested in Cindy! Beautiful, highly successful nerds are terribly rare!

    Just so I'm not off-topic:

    Mr. Silverstein, how does Cindy look in tight sweaters?

    Drool...

    Talisman

    --

    "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
  38. Opinions on being open by SuperguyA1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the most impressive things about Google to me is how easily you seem to have embraced an open model. I realize the outward view of a company can be quite different from the internal view. How easy is it actually to make decisions such as opening API's. If it's easy can you give some advice on how one might convince their boss.

    Thanks,
    -Dave

    --
    "as plurdled gabbleblotchits on a lurgid bee" - Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz. (One man's humorous is another mans flamebait)
  39. Re:First Question! by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This shouldn't be modded down. The question just needs to be asked in a clearer way.

    What job opportunities are there at Google, and what opportunities in the industry as a whole?

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
  40. The future of Google by glh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hi Craig!

    I think Google absolutely rocks. It has by far the most intelligent/helpful search engine results. Thanks for the great service.

    Now onto the questions- what is the Google vision / strategy for the future? Where can Google go? From a search engine perspective, what are some of the challenges that you have and improvements that can be made (perhaps speeding up crawling to make the latest content available, for example)? How are you going about solving these challenges, and when can we expect them to be implemented?

    On a similar note, I've noticed that recently Google announced a "google box" that allows for corporate to take advantage of the google search algorithms and indexing. Any more products like this being planned?

  41. Google suggestions by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

    Is there any way we can find out what kind of suggestions Google receives from the public? It would be quite interesting to look at them all, and maybe some of them could now be implemented using the Google API.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  42. Attacks? by Fnagaton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have a number of web servers, some Unix some Windows, and the number of attempted attacks each day from different IPs must run in to about one hundred. It is mostly people trying to execute commands or using malformed URLs trying to exploit some known past security hole. My question is, how many attempted attacks each day do the Google servers get?

    --
    Martin Piper
    Owner - ReplicaNet and RNLobby
  43. Can Google last? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google is a great free public resource. My concern is that it has to be expensive running a resource like that. I know Google's strategy is somewhat to use the free resource as a loss leader to promote your search technology, but the key word in "loss leader" is "loss". It's a great theory as long as you are able find people who want and need your search technology.

    So my bottom line question is this: Does the web site pay for itself via the advertising? Is there a possibility that someday Google may decide the web site costs too much money to run if you get to a point where your reputation no longer needs the loss leader?

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  44. so what does it look like? by paradesign · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I know the programming contest winner gets a tour of your facility, but I think I speak for all of us when I say, I wanna see it too!

    It would be great if you did a documentary feature with TechTv or someone, because its one thing to read about your facility, but it would be another to see it.

    Thanks for all of the help I've gotten from Google.com, I don't think I'd still be in schol without it.

    Paradesign

    PS, even just a photo feature on the site would be nice.

    --
    I want 2D games back.
    1. Re:so what does it look like? by jeffy210 · · Score: 2

      You can... but you need to have a golden ticket.

      --
      ------
      "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  45. Google cache by Greenrider · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone who has ever needed a piece of information that was on a broken page will agree that the Google page cache is perhaps one of the most underrated and useful parts of your search engine.

    There's one problem that everyone has with the cache, however - you don't deep-nest the caching, so that following any links on a cached page will lead to the original (probably broken) site, instead of to another cached page. Is there a technical or legal reason for why it works this way? Any chance we'll see deep caching at some point?

    1. Re:Google cache by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 3, Informative
      ...you don't deep-nest the caching, so that following any links on a cached page will lead to the original (probably broken) site, instead of to another cached page.
      Check out the Google Toolbar (for IE only, alas)-, which adds a "Cached Snapshot of Page" item to the right click menu. Very, very cool.
      --
      Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
  46. question for Craig by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2

    I expect that the California heat and thousands of boxen require special measures to prevent overheating. What kind of measures do you take for keeping your server farm operating normally at a cool temperature?

    1. Re:question for Craig by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      That's a good question! I live in Canada and our AC went down in our server room back in march and we had to have shutdowns at certain intervals to keep them all running safely.

      We have a lot of boxes (~20 or so, I think - i'm a programmer, not a network admin), but we can't have nearly as many as Google, so they must have one helluva cooling system being in a place known to be warmer than Canada :)

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    2. Re:question for Craig by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "That's a good question! I live in Canada and our AC went down in our server room back in march and we had to have shutdowns at certain intervals to keep them all running safely."

      I know what you mean ... I am also Canadian and at my university, rooms for the engineering computer labs have problems with the cooling systems and with ~70 boxen +19" monitors turned on 24/7 and superhot display projection systems plus exactly ONE window that only opens about 15 mm wide, the PEOPLE overheat!

      I think it is only a matter of time until one of the boxen dies of heat.

  47. Google's inescapable coolness. by rob_from_ca · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How do you avoid business pressures to make short-sighted solutions, and consistently make good, common sense ideas work instead of adopting ones from marketing sources? Not only does Google have the best search engine technology, but you consistently do the "right" thing. Clean, quick homepage, text only well-identified ads, interesting research projects, etc...This is the way many search engines start, but they all went the way of the "dark" side instead of adopting the "right" solution. In my jobs, it's been very difficult to execute and justify good engineering (or just common sense) under pressure from the people who control the money. Any advice for driving through well-thought-out decisions instead of adopting the "management fad of the month"?

  48. Possible to have too much power by sphealey · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In one of Robert Heinlein's novels (don't have the reference at hand), the main character is told to sit down in front of what we would think of today as (WWW + Google) and "learn whatever she can about everything". After a few weeks of coming up with some useful stuff, she finally asks the system: 'who controls this database?', and it replies 'not programmed with that information'. The next morning an assasination team tries to kill her.

    Not to be too "X-File'ish", but does there come a point where too much knowledge is captured in Google? A point where anything that doesn't exist in Google doesn't exist, period? Wouldn't that represent a very tempting target for a bin Laden or a John Ashcroft, to try to control how the modern world thinks?

    Kind of far out there, I know, but do you guys worry about this kind of thing?

    sPh

    1. Re:Possible to have too much power by NCamero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      FYI: That Heinlein novel was named Friday.

    2. Re:Possible to have too much power by jdavidb · · Score: 2

      I'd just like to go on the record and say not everyone thinks likening John Ashcroft to bin Laden is an appropriate comparison. Slashdot may be lockstep on some issues, but let's open our minds and have some healthy disagreement here. Try a different perspective for a change.

    3. Re:Possible to have too much power by felipeal · · Score: 2

      A point where anything that doesn't exist in Google doesn't exist, period?

      Like:

      When the chief Jedi record-keeper is asked in "Attack of the Clones" about a planet she has never heard of, she replies that if it's not in the Jedi archives, it doesn't exist. (The planet in question does exist, again, with terrible consequences.)

    4. Re:Possible to have too much power by WNight · · Score: 2

      Actually, even if you don't associate them with each other, the post still works. Bin Laden wants to destroy western culture, Ashcroft wants to save it (as he sees) by any means, even so far (as we see) by destroying what it stands for.

      They're very different, but both a threat.

  49. Slashdot effect? by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many sites, when referenced by Slashdot, crumble under the load. Can you folks see any difference, either to your "main" servers (www.google.com) or your cache servers?

    --
    Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
    1. Re:Slashdot effect? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I doubt very much that they'd notice a significant change in load when slashdotted.

      One commercial website I look after has been slashdotted quite a few times on some quite big stories, sometimes resulting in an extra 20k pages/hr, though normally quite a bit less.

      On an average day, we serve about 2m pages (so say 150k/hr during the popular daytime hours) and we've quite a lot of spare capacity, so an extra 20k pages/hr doesn't worry us too much.

      Google say they're serving 150m searches/day so an extra 20k/hr will go practically unnoticed I imagine.
      (see http://www.google.com/press/highlights.html)

      While I'm on the subject, does anyone else have experience with running a fairly big site while it's being /.'d? Does about 5-20k pages/hr in referrals sound about right? Maybe my experience is atypical, I'm not sure...

  50. mod_google by TwP · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just curious when mod_google is going to be released for the apache webserver. It would be nice to have the power of Google indexing available to those of us without significant IT budgets (i.e. wife won't let me "buy another #$*@! computer").

    1. Re:mod_google by DeadSea · · Score: 2
      You should check out htdig. It now comes with Redhat. It will crawl a web site or web sites, index them, and provide a web search. You can set it up to look a lot like google. You can tweak the parameters so that it pays attention to how often a page is linked and you can set up weights for how important a word is based on where in the page it is and even if it is in the link text that points to that page. I don't think that google has much more than that, but they seem to have their values well tuned.

      It isn't the easiest thing to configure since there are so many options for crawling and ranking pages. The look and feel for the pages it spits out isn't so clean looking as google, so when I've set it up I've had to modify that as well. It doesn't do caching, or tie in the a directory, but for a local search, those aren't much use anyway.

    2. Re:mod_google by llamalicious · · Score: 2

      or , 'eh?

  51. Load balancing? by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 2

    How do you balance load among the www.google.com servers? Do you guide users to local servers (such as www.google.co.uk)?

    --
    Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
    1. Re:Load balancing? by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2

      I don't get guided to google.ca, so I would guess the answer is no.

      (It's easy to id me as Canadian with my ip, btw - i've been forwarded to a canadian version of a site more than once :)

      A better question might be:

      Do the servers reside in different geographic regions (ie/ google.ca frontend and index in Canada)? Do they connect to one central index or is it replicated?

      This information may be available, but I haven't looked, so maybe it's already answered on their site...

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  52. When things get ugly by timdorr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What's the worst thing ever to happen to the google server farm? (Besides the pidgeons knawing on cables)

    --
    Tim Dorr
    Owner/Manger
    A Small Orange
  53. Dealing with DoS by Wanker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How does google deal with denial of service attacks, particularly distributed ones?

    The rest of us just suck it up with fat network pipes, but a high-profile target like google would be the holy grail of Internet vandals.

    Has anyone ever poisoned your DNSes, effectively taking Google down even though the server are up? Successfully inserted bogus WAN routing info into the Internet, again effectively bringing down Google even though the servers are fine?

    What's your worst cracker/net vandal story?

  54. Key Ingredients To Success? by timeOday · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Conventional wisdom holds that marketing and strategy are the keys to success in business, and that technical excellence is a relatively minor factor. Yet google seems to have come out of nowhere to dominate an already crowded market for search engines - without Superbowl ads, a mascot, or (unless I'm mistaken) an IPO.

    To what do you credit the popularity of google? Do you consider google a "success," or are you holding out for thousands of employees and billions in cash flow?

  55. OS: 90% Win, 4% Mac, 1% Linux, 5% Other by crow · · Score: 2

    That's for May. Of course, it's all at the Zeitgeist, as linked in other responses. I don't blame you for not knowing about it, though; I've tried to find it from Google's web page, but couldn't until I searched for it (using Google, of course).

  56. What does Craig do for fun? by ManxStef · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Personally I'm usually pretty drained after a fun day staring at the screen and typing like a monkey, and sometimes completely avoid the PC when I get home, prefering to chill with a decent book (currently Cradle to Cradle), zone-out in front of the TV, or go cycling in the beautiful Isle of Man (watch "Waking Ned Devine" for an idea of the scenery - jealous?<grin/>).

    So I guess my completely-non-tech question is:

    What do you do in "loafing" time (ie. loaf - To pass time at leisure; idle.), when you've left the office, "lost" the pager/Blackberry/PDA/mobile etc., and got away from it all?

    Cheers,
  57. The Web's full potential by __past__ · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What do you think about the Semantic Web initiative driven by the W3C and others?

    Do you expect widespread usage of RDF/DAML/OWL/TopicMaps for explicit meta-data annotation of web resources, or will it be used only in small circles of specialized content providers like academia, or maybe not at all?

    How will Google react? Do you plan to use meta-data provided by web resources if found, and how will you decide if it isn't just made up to get people on some bogus pr0n site (like with those <meta>-Tags today)? Will it someday render the brute-force approach of full-text-indexing obsolete?

  58. Distributed Google by maroberts · · Score: 2

    Have you ever considered setting up a distributed search engine client to expand your server farm through your users systems?

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  59. Why not Google as a Non-Profit? by mr_don't · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...or, what if google gets hit by a bus?

    Google has become such an important part of the Internet for millions of average users. With this in mind, my friends and I often joke about what would happen if (knock on wood) Google were to go out of business. I suggest that ICANN should do something useful for a change, and fund Google as an official, non-profit project for searching the net.

    Although I have heard that Google turns a good profit, what exactly is preventing Google from becoming a not-for-profit organization? Couldn't Google take the extra income from licensing its search to create better search technologies and pay the employees, rather than make some shareholders rich? Wouldn't this perhaps make Google a more sustainable organization?


    1. Re:Why not Google as a Non-Profit? by rnd() · · Score: 2
      There is nothing wrong with making the people rich who believed in your idea enough to invest their money in it.

      If you want to start a not-for-profit search engine, go right ahead.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  60. Googe AS Gateway to the Internet by Nomad7674 · · Score: 2

    At least once a week now, I read someone who proclaims that "I no longer even use bookmarks or try typing in URLs. I just always go to Google for my information." Has anyone approached you (or have you considered yourself) producing a Web Browser which has no URL line, but instead has a Google line to automatically send anything typed there to Google as a gateway to the Internet? Seems like it would "sell" to the Google-holics.

  61. Technical Advisory Council by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 2

    You've got some incredibly cool peopleon your Technical Advisory Council. How often do you interact with them?

    --
    Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at
  62. Nice Question by sweatyboatman · · Score: 2

    If I had mod points right now... Well, it's at 5 already.

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
  63. Browser stats lacking at Zeitgeist by crow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They have a nice graph, but no scale. I suppose you could do some careful pixel analysis of the graph to generate percentages, but it's a shame they don't list them.

    Interestingly, I see "Other" has been steadily rising since it bottomed out in January, and has now surpassed Netscape 4. I would love to be able to click on that chart and see a detailed list of the percentages, and what "other" is composed of. Hopefully we'll see Mozilla get its own line on the graph soon.

    It would also be nice to see a breakdown on a per-OS basis. I wonder how many people are running Internet Explorer on Linux? (Seriously, that would indicate what portion of non-IE users hack the browser tag to make web sites happy.)

    1. Re:Browser stats lacking at Zeitgeist by skt · · Score: 2

      I noticed that too, they should break "other" up and show at least mozilla and opera individually. I would say that they could probably take off IE4 too, it seems to be almost dead. It's surprising how many people are using IE6 actually, although it's tough to see what percentage that is. IE6 is actually a relatively minor upgrade for v5 from what I understand.. I wonder if IE's "check for updates" feature is responsible for that. I'm pretty sure that the only OS to include IE6 by default is WinXP.

  64. Google cache and copyright by dargaud · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The google cache threads on the muddy water of copyright. Do you feel like you are going to run into trouble because of it ? Some conflicted opinions about it are:
    • It serves copyrighted pages without the author's consent
    • It serves pages without the original site's knowledge
    • It's very useful
    • If a page is on the web, it can be archived/cached...
    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  65. Staying on Top... by Dr.+Molf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Google is an incredibly popular and effective website. I'm curious about the amount of pressure you have to expand in order to "stay competitive" or "aptly serve consumer's needs". Is there any kind of a push to go the way of yahoo or amazon and try and include EVERYTHING on that simple page? As things evolve, do you really see Google staying the top engine in 3 to 5 years?

    --
    indeed..
  66. Newsgroups by scott1853 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've made some really stupid posts to the newgroups in the past and I used my real name. Can you delete them for me?

    1. Re:Newsgroups by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Absolutely. What was your name again? We'll also need your username and password, and your SSN for transitive co-location identification.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Newsgroups by Wanker · · Score: 2
      Here's the obligatory RTFM post:

      http://groups.google.com/googlegroups/help.html#9

  67. Caching, forward, reverse proxy by ezs · · Score: 2, Interesting
    How much of your content is static; do you use edge caching and proxies to offset the load; who's caching engine do you use?

    --
    Evil ZEN Scientist
  68. Internal Admin Utilities? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How do you guys manage thousands of servers spread throughout multiple datacenters?

    How do you handle user accounts? Event notification?

    Do you guys use "enterprise" software like Tivoli or Openview, or did you roll your own solution?

    --
    Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    1. Re:Internal Admin Utilities? by James+Youngman · · Score: 4, Interesting
      A previous poster (duffbeer703) asked
      How do you guys manage thousands of servers spread throughout multiple datacenters?

      How do you handle user accounts? Event notification?

      Do you guys use "enterprise" software like Tivoli or Openview, or did you roll your own solution?

      ... to which I would add,

      How do you balance the need to keep systems up-to-date against your (doubtless demanding) availability requirements? Is there enough redundancy in there that you just flip a machine out while it is updated? Presumably, however the machine is upgraded, this is automatic - you must have too many machines to do it any other way!

      How to you test these updates (security patches, distribution updates, regular changes to your own software, configuration tweaks)? Do you have some kind of enormous test environment containing a copy of 50% of the main Google cache or something? For that matter, how do you do the testing itself? Do you type "Most clowns drink blue fruit juice on Mars" in the search box and just verify that you get 184 hits, and say "right, it works", or do you have a more sophisticated method of testing it (for example do you run your test system against a captive internal dataset)?

  69. If this question gets modded to +5 Funny... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2

    will you answer it?

  70. I've asked this before by scott1853 · · Score: 2

    Why do you have a neurosurgeons on staff?

  71. Do you expect Google to be slashdotted? by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Dang, torn between modding up questions and submitting one of my own...

    What would it take to Slashdot Google? What do you do to avoid this? Have you been Slashdotted before, either from Slashdot itself or from some other link?

    1. Re:Do you expect Google to be slashdotted? by jesser · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You have it backwards. Google slashdots other sites. Have you ever seen a Geocities hit at the top of a search for song lyrics? Those links never work, because Geocities blocks links to sites that get too many hits.

      You might be able to slashdot Google with a real-life event that everyone learns about at the same time, such as an earthquake or a big breaking-news story like 9/11. But even then, I'd expect Google to be able to handle it.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
  72. Testing and Deployment by mo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can you possibly test bugfixes/changes that need to get deployed to thousands of machines? Furthermore, how in the heck do you deploy the changes once they're tested. I understand you probably can't describe the exact process, but perhaps you can enlighten us on some principals learned on the subject of CM on such a massive scale.

  73. Google API by __past__ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After the introduction of the Google API, some people, especially from the REST camp, criticized the the use of SOAP, claiming it just adds superflous bloat and is generally "unwebby". What do you think about this?

  74. I have one question... by Helmholtz+Coil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    that comes to mind when I think of a huge server farm like Google's: can you give a rough order of magnitude (# of zeros maybe) on what your electric bill is?

    Thanks very much for Google. The more I use it the more I appreciate it.

  75. Network Management Tools/Technologies by kaladorn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Everyone will ask about bandwidth, incoming lines, etc. (All the network capacity and capability stuff). Here's something a little more off the beaten track:

    What technologies help to support the Google server farm? What kind of automated monitoring and trouble reporting tools are in use? Are they home brew, open-source, or COTS with some customization (scripts, etc)? And if you had to point to one area of network management and say "we could use some improvement or some better tools", what would that area be?

    BTW - Google Rocks! I never use anything else anymore!

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    1. Re:Network Management Tools/Technologies by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      BTW - Google Rocks! I never use anything else anymore

      Hotbot supports searching for pages with links to a file of arbitrary extension (see the advanced search page), which Google does not currently do.

      Google does not provide an FTP search engine, which other search engine providers do (Lycos used to run one).

      Other than that, yeah, Google is great. It's absolutely incredible that the best search engine out there shares my philosophy that pages should be simple and small.

    2. Re:Network Management Tools/Technologies by cygnusx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > BTW - Google Rocks! I never use anything else anymore!

      I used to say the same 'til very recently. Alltheweb.com has good results too -- I suggest you try them out. They claim their index size is bigger as well: a fact I can attest to: I have found pages on alltheweb I haven't found on google (try this on alltheweb and google to see what I mean -- though I guess this isn't a _very_ good example :-)

      Google still rules though (size isn't everything!) because of its relevancy rankings etc.

    3. Re:Network Management Tools/Technologies by kaladorn · · Score: 2

      Large (unnecessarily so in most cases) pages are the bane of anyone still on dial up, which (since most web designers seem to have forgotten it) is MOST OF THE PEOPLE ON THE NET. Using lightweight pages is a major plus in my eyes.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  76. Pigeons! Re:Simple question by ilyag · · Score: 2, Funny
    1. Re:Pigeons! Re:Simple question by operagost · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see their implementation of RFC1149!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  77. Keeping a small company feel in a big company by gentlewizard · · Score: 2

    Like everyone else here, kudos for a truly useful and fun utility.

    Google seems to be a classic case of fast growth. What have you been doing to try to maintain Google's unique culture as you grow? In particular, as you add more services to Google and the interface becomes more complex, so too will your internal organization. Will a big Google become a Dilbert-like Google-plex?

  78. Are you guys making enough money? by Control-Z · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Are you guys making enough money?

    I wish you'd give us some banner ads or something, I feel guilty. I don't want Google to go away. :)

    Seriously, why don't you serve banner ads?

    -Dan

  79. Google Voice Search by NeoYoda · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There has been much debate about what the practical purpose for Google Voice search might be, could you fill us in? Is it really for use in cars?

  80. Googlebombing by HMV · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In fact, there is an opposite concern. Whether through a network of links or through coordinated googlebombing [googlebombing.com], weblogs frequently show up near the top due to the nature of reciprocal linking between the blogs. Not saying that's good or bad (sometimes a sole voice is a better expert on a topic than CNN), but it is what it is. Ranking "links" seems valid enough, but then you ask if that includes machine-generated links by someone's aggregator and the issue becomes a little more cloudy.

  81. why the ancient design technique? by Ravagin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ahoy love the google, it's the only engine I trust these days. Nevertheless....

    For a site where speed and information delivery are of the utmost importance, and archaic table-based design seems rather strange. Is there any reason you have yet switched to a more forwards-compatible xhtml/css design? (Note that by "design" I mean more the html and css than the visual appearance of it)

    For my own amusement, I've been looking at recoding the google design in CSS, and it's really not that hard.

    Thanks!

    --

    Karma: T-rexcellent.

  82. Not infinitely recursive? by dmarien · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why can't I find a cache'd version of this page anywhere? if the live cache'd version goes down, and there's no cache'd cache'd version, whatever will we do? :)

    --
    dmarien
  83. Google toolbar for open source browsers? by apol · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I've become addicted to the Google toolbar. It only works with IE which I use at work since I am forced to use windows there. Now with Mozilla 1.0 and my constant wish to minimise the usage of Microsoft products, I am faced with the dilemma of keeping IE or loosing the Google toolbar.

    Why haven't you implemented yet the toolbar for open source browsers? Are there technical difficulties or rather lack of interest from Google?

    1. Re:Google toolbar for open source browsers? by seanmeister · · Score: 3, Informative

      You might be interested in this: http://googlebar.mozdev.org/

  84. Basic Stats by dbc001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can we get some basic stats with the interview? I mean, we all know that Google gets a lot of traffic but how many hits per day/hour/minute? How big is the server farm? How much bandwidth are they eating? How about some other interesting stats? (I'm sure they have plenty!)

    dbc

  85. Three letter agencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can you tell us anything about how you are working
    with the various intelligence agencies to provide
    them information about seraches that are of interest to them?
    Are you thinking of providing SSL access to your
    web pages so that these agencies will have to work
    with you instead just monitoring your network
    traffic?

  86. question for Craig re: search languages by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How/why in the world was a Google search in Klingon developed!?!

  87. How do you benchmark your software? by Nijika · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How does Google benchmark software? Eg how do you benchmark Apache, SQL, your CGIs etc...

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  88. And the Sergey says.... by qurob · · Score: 4, Informative


    From one interview...

    Jason: What led to Google's decision to use Linux? When did that start?

    Sergey: Well, Larry Page and I were in the Stanford PhD program in Computer Science. And we developed Google there. The way the computer science program worked is there was a hodgepodge of computer equipment lying around, and we would grab whatever scraps we could. We had all kinds of computers: HPs, Suns, Alphas and Intel's running Linux. So, we gained a lot of experience with all of those platforms.

    When we started Google, we had to make the decision of what we wanted to use. Of course we chose Linux, because it is the most cost effective solution.

    PCs are not only much cheaper these days, but we can also get them very quickly, because they're such a commodity item. That's an incredible benefit. We just installed another 1,000 computers and we got that done in a few weeks. That's really hard to do with any other kind of workstation. I think that's an advantage that people don't entirely realize.

    Jason: Did you view it as being better, or was cost the main reason?

    Sergey: It was better in some ways. Certainly for our purposes, we felt the support was better. For example, the actual kernel authors will respond to problems pretty quickly. They are especially responsive to Google nowadays, since we're so widely used. We can have a 15 minute turnaround. You can't really beat that for support.

    That was an important factor, but frankly, the cost was a bigger issue. PCs are so cheap, which is very important. Sun's Solaris is probably more stable than Linux on PCs. It's hard to determine the blame, whether it's the hardware or the operating system. But, it's a minor difference.

    Jason: Then, does all of your support come from newsgroups or do you actually pay for it through Red Hat?

    Sergey: We have an operations team of about ten people, which helps a lot. And other than that we check newsgroups and e-mail the authors of the code. Usually, if it's a problem we can't figure out, we go straight to the authors.

    Jason: Is Linux used on desktops at Google?

    Sergey: It depends. Engineering mostly runs Linux. Business development/marketing runs Windows. Actually, I use Linux with VMWare running Windows. Some people have two computers, particularly some people in engineering who do UI development and need to test things out on Windows platforms. I find it better to just use VmWare and have one computer.

    Jason: In a technical sense, what does Linux lack? What does it not provide?

    Sergey: The 64-bit file system, which I know they are working on. It's slowly coming around. I think there are still occasionally some stability issues. I'm not saying Linux is unique in that respect, but you definitely want to have reliability. There are some issues dealing with higher memory systems. If you get to 2GB, and you try to push it past that, we encounter various problems. I know we've had some trouble with the network stack when we really push it hard. In terms of having lost most connections from lots of different machines.


    And from another...

    How is Linux used at the Google Projects? Why was Linux choose to improve Google search engine?

    Sergey Brin: Actually, we currently run over 6,000 RedHat servers.

    Linux is used everywhere...on the 6,000+ servers themselves, as well as desktop machines for all of our technical employees. We chose Linux because if offers us the price for performance ratio. It's so nice to be able to customize any part of the operating system that we like, at anytime. We have a large degree of in-house Linux expertise, too.

    Most of our administrative tools were developed in-house, as well.

  89. What's the back end? by Second_Derivative · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't remember what HTTPd they're running but it sure as hell isn't apache. Someone said that they get 1k hits per SECOND; what do you use to shape that insane amount of traffic? What is the '/search' page coded in? What databases are used to index a terabyte of data? How do those 10,000 nodes find the data they need to quickly? what sort of interlinks are used?

    How to you build a cluster like a war machine, in other words? ;)

  90. Google Infrastructure & Ad Systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'd like to learn more about Google's infrastructure, particularly its advertising systems.
    • As a web user, I admire Google's decision to stick with non-obtrusive text advertisements, and it keeps me coming back to your site day after day.
    • As a recent customer of that system, I felt let down at the success rate that, in my anecdotal case, Google ads provided -- a small bill from Google, but not many hits from it and no sales as a result. I realize that this is just one anecdotal example, and maybe not representative of general patterns, but still -- it was disappointing.
    • As a sysadmin for a busy news site (and a sysadmin that is focusing on ad delivery systems at that), I'm curious about what parts of Google's ad system works and what parts don't, both from a technical and business point of view.

    From what I've read about Google, it seems like the same server farm nodes spend time on both searching (crawling, indexing, and storage) and on queries (web searches from customers). Is this really the case? If so, is ad delivery another part of this system being carried out by all nodes? Put another way, how homogeneous are your server nodes: do they all do an equal share of searching, responding to web requests, and participating in the ad system? If server farm nodes are not as homogeneous as I'm thinking, then how are the different functional aspects of Google's service broken down -- crawling, indexing, storage, queries, ads, and any administrative services you need internally -- and how much of your resources are being thrown particularly at the ad serving aspects of your site? Do you have some machines focusing on ads, or is that folded in with search queries, and that in turn is folded in with the actual business of searching? No matter how it's broken down, I can imagine that it must be fiendishly complicated, and I'm continually impressed at how smoothly you manage to make it work.

    From a business standpoint, how happy is Google with the ad strategy being used? Is it producing a significant portion of your revenues, or are you getting much more from the search services & hardware solutions you're providing to paying clients? How flexible is the current ad delivery system? I.e. if you're selling keyword matching to ad customers to a system distributed across thousands of servers, and promising those customers that they'll get, say, 100,000 page views, how is this work synchronized across the servers doing search queries? It seems like this could all quickly get in the way of the search services Google is really trying to offer, but it's hard to imagine if it would help more to do it all "inline" with the rest of the site (but possibly slowing everything down fractionally) or breaking it off into a separate system (but adding more internal network traffic, potentially making it harder to do up-to-date reporting, etc). More broadly, what tools are available to you internally for monitoring your overall quality of service? Do these systems co-exist with the rest of the site, or are they also broken away -- and again, if they are, how to you keep reporting information current enough to be useful?

    Basically, I'm curious about the infrastructure, both from a technical and a business perspective. There have been a number of papers & articles over the past couple of years documenting how Google maintains it's server farm for delivering search services to users; I'd like to know more about what's going on at the back to keep that forward-facing system running so well.

  91. Speech recognition by harmonica · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are there plans to index audio files (and the audio tracks of video files) so that these could be searched as well? I would guess that existing speech recognition packages could be reused for this purpose so that development would not be too complicated.

    Recognizing text in images and videos and indexing that would be a similar task. I know that Google Catalog Search must be doing some OCR already, but I have no idea if this would take too many CPU cycles if applied to all images, or if there are other problems (the images themselves already get downloaded for the image search, so bandwidth should not be the problem).

  92. Should people use more than one Search Engine by tinla · · Score: 2

    I have google as my home page. I have the IE toolbar on my windows machine and the Galeon eqiv on my Linux box. In short - Google is normaly my first port of call.

    Despite this I've always made a consious effort to keep a backup search engine that I try if I ever find myself using more than a "few" of the results from Google. I find that if there are, say, 10 good pages from google there will be at least 3 that AllTheWeb (for example) will find that Google didn't have in the top 50.

    I've decided that its very dangerous to use one SE to the exclusion of all else because there will always be holes, index bias, algorithm oddities etc that hide some of the info you wanted. As long as your other SE isn't simply playing follow-the-leader you'll benefit from the little effort of using a second source.

    The idea is old of course, any researcher will tell you that having one source is poor methodology.

    Does Google recognise this idea and is there anything you plan to do about it?

    A Super-advanced search that allowed you to alter the weightings of link importance, document age, the domain it sits on etc etc? That'd surely be too much work for the average Joe.

    I don't have an answer or I'd be sat coding it up but I do find searches that simply work better elsewhere. Maybe if you had 3 algs with a 70%, 20%, 10% mix in the results we'd all be a little richer.

    Discuss...

    --
    0daymeme.com: Great stuff.
  93. Google Search Appliance - PageRank? by nanobug · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google's PageRank technology works very well on the web with lots of pages pointing to lots of other pages.

    The Google Search Appliance, however, is targeted at an office environment. Most of the documents (especially the non-html ones) in the typical office stand alone and do not have links to each other.

    How has Google modified or complimented (if at all) the PageRank algorithm to make it more suited to an office environment?

    I am currently pushing management at my site to purchase a Google Search Appliance, so I need an answer to this to help justify the change from our existing search application. i.e. without a good PageRank score, how does the Search Appliance order the result set in a useful way?

  94. Accepting ads for net abuse by Frater+219 · · Score: 2
    Since you are a technician with some significant Net experience, I can only presume that you are already familiar with the harms of spamming. One of the notable developments in spamming of recent has been the widespread use of spamware -- mail client software designed for the express purpose of abusing other people's networks by spamming.

    Dealing in spamware is illegal in several U.S. states and European nations. By and large, spamware programs have no lawful use -- they are built to abuse open relays and proxies, fraudulently alter mail headers, and obfuscate spammed messages to make it harder for victims to track down the spammer. Spamware is not merely a "burglar's tool" useful for lawless action -- it is like a locksmithing kit specifically tailored to be excellent for burglary and no good for legitimate locksmithing, or a gun somehow built to be perfect for murder but nonfunctional for self defense.

    Nevertheless, Google accepts ads for spamware -- as well as ads for other spamming services. Google today carries advertisements and thereby accepts sponsorship from dealers in network abuse. Given the real and present danger that spamming poses to the usefulness of the email facility, and the amount of time and money that today's Internet-using businesses and people spend defending themselves from this form of theft -- how can Google justify accepting this sponsorship?

  95. Open Source by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First of all, thank you so much for providing the most useful site on the net.

    I understand part of the success of Google has to do with the efficient use of open source/free software. How about in-house software development?. Do you folks develop open source software as a way of giving back to the community ?. What are your thoughts on free software ?

  96. Regexp Support Someday? by ReadParse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A big part of Google's strength is in the supported search syntax, most notably that you can search for phrases instead of just keywords, that you can filter OUT certain phrases or keywords, and that you can search for content on specific sites, or NOT on specific sites. The next step for me and probably a lot of other Unix/Perl types is regular expression support.

    For example, let's say I'm looking for 80's brat pack member Anthony Michael Hall (not that I would do such a think), but I can't remember his middle name. Looking for "Anthony Hall" will do me little if any good, but looking for "Anthony \w+ Hall" could do the trick nicely.

    Another example is that the user can provide their own limited fuzzy searching, by searching for optional prefixes and suffixes along with the root, instead of having to get the word or phrase exactly as it's indexed.

    Thanks,
    John

    1. Re:Regexp Support Someday? by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2, Informative
      For example, let's say I'm looking for 80's brat pack member Anthony Michael Hall (not that I would do such a think), but I can't remember his middle name. Looking for "Anthony Hall" will do me little if any good, but looking for "Anthony \w+ Hall" could do the trick nicely.
      You can already do this by searching for Anthony * Hall . I use Google's wildcard feature all the time, definitely not a replacement for regexes but it works.
      --
      "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    2. Re:Regexp Support Someday? by ReadParse · · Score: 2

      Ah, indeed it DOES support wildcards. Something told me that I had checked and had found that it did not. I'm now glad that I got moderated down a point (for being "overrated") after having reached the elusive 5, so as not to get too embarrased in public about that.

      Yes, you're right -- no substitute for regular expressions. But definitely useful for all my brat pack searches :)

      Thanks,
      John

  97. Next big thing? by byee · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A few years ago Google came along with their new ranking algorithim and blew away all other competition. Now it's the only search engine I, and the vast majority of the people I know, use.


    What is Google doing to keep itself on top? Do you think there is a lot of room for improvement? How do you think web searching can get better?

  98. "The Slashdot Effect" by Zzootnik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So I'm truly surprised no one has asked this one yet, as it's the first thing that popped into my head...

    The masses of Slashdotters have slashed and dotted many an unlucky website over the years...Pushing webservers to their limit and often breaking them outright...

    With Google's Massive resources, Is there any noticeable difference when a /. story gets posted and people go stampeding to google to find out more? Or is that happening right now? (I'd hate to think of myself as part of a huge herd of individually acting DDOS'ers, but unfortunately, that's about what it ends up being...)

    --
    Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
  99. Google toolbar for Netscape / Mozilla? by sphealey · · Score: 2
    When will you be releasing the Google Toolbar for Netscape 6 (7?) and/or Mozilla?

    sPh

  100. What about incorporating Cyc? by raylee5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Since Cyc has done a stint with Lycos, what about with the Google engine? Especially since Google maintains one of the largest and most relevant databases, a single question asked may result in huge amounts of additional, relevant information flowing into Cyc?

  101. how about what browser by johnjones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    everyone asking about hardware and to be honest its not what makes google good
    after all thewayback machine does kind of the same thing

    its software

    so this is my question

    what browser do you use ?

    regards

    john '1.1alpha' jones

  102. Database by totallygeek · · Score: 2
    I have always been amazed by Google, and can certainly see why Linux was chosen for its Unix-like use without the Unix-like pricing. However, there have always been databases for Linux that would work for your environment, and especially within the last few years. Has there been talk of or pressure to use something like DB2 or Oracle for your indexing? If so, how has that been countered?

  103. Operating System by evilviper · · Score: 2

    Every major operating system has it's example of a major corporation which is perhaps the flagship company associated with the OS. e.g. Yahoo and FreeBSD, Earthlink/Ebay and Solaris, Adobe and OpenBSD, and Google and Linux.

    So, having had to deal with Linux on a large scale, would you say that Linux was the right choice for what you are doing? With the benefit of heindsight, would you rather have gone with another operating system, such as FreeBSD, OpenBSD, Solaris, AIX, etc?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  104. Pictures would be cool. by bakuretsu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think I speak for everyone when I say I'd like to see this Linux cluster Google is running. Just a Matrix-esque shot of the wall(s) of rackmount servers would be enough to make me happy.

    --

    --
    The Bailiwick - DESIGNHUB2005
  105. DOJ or HLS talking to you? by randomErr · · Score: 2

    So is the Dept. of Justice(DOJ) or Home Land Security(HSL) talk to you? In partictular, are you(google.com) being asked to track certian 'security' queries(bombs, antrax, Command Taco, ect.) of your system?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  106. editor by ppetru · · Score: 2

    vi or emacs?

    --

    Petru
  107. Re:OT .sig comment by killmenow · · Score: 2, Funny

    78% of statistics are made up on the spot ;^)

  108. More popular cached pages by Richard5mith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read recently that you cache many of the more popular pages every 15 minutes, which was a surprise. Exactly how many pages are counted in this "popular" set, how do you decide when to move a page from the normal every 28 day rotation to this one, and what's the process for getting one of these pages (say from my server) cached on yours, indexed, page ranked and available across your whole server farm for searching.


    -- Chatbear - http://www.chatbear.com -- Free messageboards, Highly Customisable

  109. opening up the data for science by fons · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While doing some scientific research I discovered that the the Google Seitgeist is a very interesting source of information for research in the area's of social and communication sciences (marketing, lifestyle, ...).

    However, the available information and the explanation of used methodology is too limitid to make this information usefull scientifically.

    This is a shame because the Seitgeist is just the tip of the iceberg. There must be an enormous amount of information available.

    I know for sure that a few professors I know would have a field day if they were to be able to analyse all this data.

    My question is: would it be possible to open all the available data to scientists for statistical analysis?

    It doesn't even have to be free I think. Universities and research organisations pay a lot of money for survey's that result in datasets that are relativly small to the dataset available at Google.

  110. Use of Python by BobRoss · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have heard that Google uses Python extensively to manage its data, grab new data, etc.

    As an avid fan of the Python language, I am interested in exactly how Google puts it to use. Can you clue us in?

    P.S. - Keep up the good work!

  111. The interview by inkfox · · Score: 2
    "Craig, can you tell me..."

    Your question netted 53,496 possible answers. I've filtered out similar answers, so let me just give you the first 1,000...

    --
    Says the RIAA: When you EQ, you're stealing bass!
  112. downtime disaster stories by fons · · Score: 4, Interesting


    We've all had servers crashing on us just before a deadline. We've all had to go to the office in the middle of the night to prevent a disaster. (we've all been hacked by a scipt-kid, once)

    Do you have any stories of disasters or difficult moments in the datacenters that kept you all up for a few nights in a row, but went by unnoticed by the public?

  113. My question... by Kickstart70 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's the root password?

    :)

    Kickstart

  114. Does he ever feel lucky? by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well...does he?

  115. Ogle the Google by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

    The Google image search is wonderful, but shouldn't that have been called Ogle?

  116. That's a good question, My question is: by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there anything on the internet that you personally couldn't find with google and if so what was it?

    p.s.
    Thanks for all your help with my school research

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  117. Google Toolbar for non-IE/Windows boxen? by mshomphe · · Score: 2

    The Google toolbar is one of the coolest things about IE (maybe the only one <grin/>). However, you need a Windows system with IE in order to install and use it. Are there plans to have to toolbar available for Mozilla, and non-Microsoft systems in general?

    --
    She sat at the window watching the evening invade the avenue.
  118. Weighting of heuristics by jolshefsky · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As the web develops, methods of matching a set of search keywords to a set of websites related to those keywords must change with it. I envision that the Google algorithms rank search hits by summing weighted factors such as overall site popularity, META tag keywords, META tag descriptions, TITLE tag contents, text contents, keywords containted in URLs, and so on.

    Can you talk a bit about how those weights have changed over time? Have there been any surprising shifts?

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

    1. Re:Weighting of heuristics by danny · · Score: 2
      META tags have never been used by Google, as far as I know, nor popularity in the sense of number of visitors.

      The original algorithm used only TITLEs and the number and quality of links to the page (ie PageRank). These days, the text in and near the anchors of incoming links is a major part of the algorithm.

      Danny.

      --
      I have written over 900 book reviews
  119. Do you..... by pjdepasq · · Score: 2

    Do you Yahoo?

    ;-)

  120. googlewhacking by Prowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    has there been a noticeable increase in hit rate since google whacking became popular?

    have you had to take counter measures?

    also, you already have an elmer fudd language, how about duke nukem or yoda?

    --
    That man tried to kill mah Daddy
  121. Google Office Systems by scriptopia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to the Google site, in the career section one of the perks to working at Google is having a high powered linux workstation. My question is: How well does it work using linux as the Desktop/Workstation OS. What kind of compatibility issues have you run into when working with partners who use Windows. Additionally what kind of custom software soutions have been needed to make it work.

    -ryan

  122. King of the search engines by mikosullivan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    • CUI was king of the search engines. WebCrawler took them down.
    • WebCrawler was king of the search engines. AltaVista took them down.
    • AltaVista was king of the search engines. Google took them down.
    • Google is king of the search engines.

    Does this chain of thought keep you up at night?

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
    1. Re:King of the search engines by Kickstart70 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For a long while Lycos claimed to have knowledge of the most pages as well. There are many different ways of saying who is 'king'. I don't disagree that Google beats the heck out of everything else currently available though.

      Now...if Google wants to stay on top with me, I'd like to see the following:

      • 'regexp.google.com', so that we have a little more control over how and what we search
      • If not regexp, then at least wilcards for words. I would like to search for something like "word1 * word3" and have the search engine return all the instances where word1 and word3 have any number of word2' between them.
      • Dropping country specific google sites. I absolutely hate the fact that when I type in 'www.google.com' it autoforwards me to 'www.google.ca' with Canadian content enabled. I've spoke to them about it, and there are workarounds, but they refuse to make it easy to not be categorized by country.
      • I'd like to see the last time a returned link was indexed by Google, to know how up-to-date a link is. This especially becomes vital for technical issues, where a returned link on a specific piece of software is no longer useful because of version changes.

      I can come up with a lot of things saying 'how to make search engines more useful'. Now if only someone would listen.

      Kickstart

  123. food by asv108 · · Score: 2

    I noticed that at google has free gourmet lunches for all its employees couresy of Chef Charlie. My question is how good is the food and has Charlie told you any interesting stories from his days with the Grateful Dead?

  124. Apologies to Steven Wright by Joao · · Score: 2

    I have been pondering this question for quite some time, and I think I finally found the one person who might give me the answer:

    Dear Mr. Silverstein. If you could have everything, where would you put it? ;-)

  125. Corporate Culture by zpengo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As an addendum to this, what is it about the corporate culture at Google that makes it work so well while other "hip" dot coms went down the toilet? What's the magic ingredient that made Google turn out differently?

    --


    Got Rhinos?
  126. Searching multiple sites by mikosullivan · · Score: 2
    Right now on Google you can either search a single host or the whole web. It would be great if you could search a set of hosts, and also if you could restrict the search to specific directories within those hosts. The specific reason I ask is that I've written an open source bookmarking system and it would be great if users could search the pages and sites they've bookmarked.

    Speaking of bookmarks, do you have any plans to offer a bookmarking service?

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  127. Google's Ethical Leadership by Dissident · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How has Google managed to deal so well with ethical issues in the current economic environment? For instance, how has Google managed to avoid going to pop up ads, unfair treatment of search returns based on payoffs, and other challenges? Most search engines and news sites have already caved in to these methods citing budget shortages. Google, on the other hand, seems to be expanding existing services, and acquiring or developing new services. How has Google managed to avoid some of the other pitfalls like clueless corporate officers who push the company into adopting bad technologies or technologies that don't fit the company? How much input and control does the non-management, but highly technical types in the company exert over the corporate vision of technology?

  128. Jakob Nielsen by icqqm · · Score: 2

    Just what impact has Jakob Nielsen had on Google's interface?

  129. What programming languages where? by webmaven · · Score: 2

    From various articles and references on the net, it's clear that Google uses a mix of languages in developing and deploying it's services. Languages I've seen cited are Python, Java, and C++. I assume this is not a complete list.

    What programming languages do Google developers use, for which tasks are they used, and why?

    --
    The real Webmaven is user ID 27463. I don't rate an imposter, because my ID is such a lame-ass high number.
  130. Technology behind news.google.com by itsmarcos · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Is it possible to have some information on the technology behind news.google.com?

    In particular:

    1. Do you use any Topic Detection & Tracking techniques.

    2. How do you cluster news stories? Do you use a Scatter/Gather approach.

    3. Is the news site going to be available through an API?

    --
    Marcos
  131. Information Visualization by briancnorton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your search results are undeniably the best available commercially on the web, but what thinking has been given to graphical information visualization? Some new search engines are trying out presenting results topologically. While these may not be very useful, there may be potential. What has google done technologically in this area if anything? Are there any plans to explore this avenue?

    --

    People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

  132. I like to watch... by odbodbo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to kill hours watching the search requests scroll by on Metacrawler's Metaspy page back when people still used Metacrawler. Any chance we could have something like that on Google? I would *almost* even pay to subscribe to a site where I could watch uncensored Google search requests go by.

  133. Re:Just exactly how cool is it. by fons · · Score: 2


    I was going to write:

    "that could be cool if there would actually be some new content on that site"

    But then I saw you just (finally? :) ) did an update.

    yey! askadick rules.

  134. Has Google Replaced URLs? by billnapier · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With the success and popularity of Google, I find myself using URL's for places less and less and just entering names into Google to find places (they are almost always on the first page...) Do you think that you have almost replaced the URL?

  135. Other content types? by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 2

    Google does a good job of indexing html and has added new types of content over the last few months.

    My question is what other contents types do you want/plan to index?

    For example I searched Google for about an hour today looking for a solution to my PHP compilation problem with no luck. I turned to IRC and got an answer in a couple of minutes. If Google archived that conversation then the next person to search for the error message would get an exact hit.

    /b

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
  136. Re:Important question! by cicadia · · Score: 2

    Why don't you ask the Internet Oracle?

    --
    Living better through chemicals
  137. Google and Mozilla by Wraithlyn · · Score: 2

    I'm not very familiar with the Google toolbar, but IMHO, Google access from Mozilla 1.0 couldn't be much easier... just type your query in the address bar, then press up-arrow to select the 'Search Google for "fubar"' from the bottom of the drop-down menu, and hit Enter... presto! Google search in 2 keystrokes. Add Ctrl to that and you even get it in a new tab. Mozilla rocks! I just wish it had smooth auto-scroll, more customizable toolbars (such as small icons, optional text, Home on the nav bar instead the personal bar), and native support for Back/Forward buttons on mice, like IE and Opera 6 do.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    1. Re:Google and Mozilla by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      Here are some of things that the Google Toolbar gives you that aren't covered by Mozilla. These are the ones I use frequently:
      • Search the current site as easily as the whole web (equivalent to adding site:... to your search terms)
      • Quick access to Google's cache of the open page
      • An 'up' button that allows you to quickly navigate a site by trimming trailing directories from a URL (i.e. www.site.com/dir1/dir2/page -> www.site.com/dir1/dir2/ -> www.site.com/dir1/ -> www.site.com/).
      • Search term highlighted in the current page
      The Google toolbar is the only thing I miss from IE.
  138. images.google.com and PNG images by Rock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Craig,

    When will images.google.com include PNG images in its search base? Why were the image types limited to GIF and JPEG, when most browsers could also display PNG? Now, virtually all non-text browsers support Portable Network Graphics.

    Questions done. I'll take this opportunity to thank Google for groups.google.com, the searchable usenet archive. In my opinion, 15% of the total value of the internet is contained therein. Excellent!

    --
    - - -
    "The sixth sick shiek's sixth sheep's sick."
  139. Slashdotted? by gafferted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can I have a prize for slashdotting google?

  140. Bandwidth monitors. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was gunna mod... but I ahve a re-quest-ion.

    Can you guys put up bandwidth graphs for the public to see. Like mrtg graphs page showing daily google request traffic flow. so we can see what type of overall trends in searching happens during the day.

    I would love to be able to see just how massive you traffic is and what it looks like.

    and let us know what tools you use to monitor all your stuff.

  141. How do you manage the Google by Zorlon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I work for a large ISP and am interested in how large systems are managed. How do you manage the Google? Do you use open source, commercial or roll-your-own monitoring. Do you use a SNMP agent and, if so to what extent. How fast can you detect a problem, troubleshoot it and fix it.

    --
    - Things are the way they are because they're coded that way -
  142. It's not how big your index is... by bani · · Score: 2

    ...it's how you use it! =)

  143. Re:Just exactly how cool is it. by fons · · Score: 2


    why do you think i keep replying?

    The longer this thread becomes, the more people will see it!

    how about that!

  144. Not a dumb question at all! by cjsnell · · Score: 2


    That's a good question and not "redundant". Let me expand on his/her question:

    Is Google actively hiring? If so, what kind of job titles are most important for Google to fill these days?

    [I'm not a headhunter]

    Chris

  145. Google has a lot of keys by fons · · Score: 2


    Hey Google seems to have all the keys to success. So that would be like looking for a needle in a ...

  146. Why Linux (over BSD, etc)? by cjsnell · · Score: 4, Interesting


    When you were selecting the OS to run Google, why did you choose Linux? I'm partial to FreeBSD but I'm pretty sure that you evaluated it and found something a) that you didn't like or b) something about Linux that you liked better. If so, what?

    Second part of this question: Do you continue to evaluate alternative operating systems?

    Chris

  147. Something wrong with making the people rich by mr_don't · · Score: 2

    Actually, economic inequity, and not lack of food, is the prevalent cause of hunger. Thus, in a way, making more people rich does create something wrong. Unless you consider it is ok that one sixth of the world's population faces chronic hunger. Like energy, there is only so much capital in the world...

    I am saying ICANN (or someone like them) - not Venture Capitalists - should fund projects like Google.

    1. Re:Something wrong with making the people rich by rnd() · · Score: 2
      Ironically, the fact that our society is free reveals that Capitalism is the economic system of choice in the world's richest nation. What should we do with that wealth? Whatever we want! That's why it's called a free society.

      Rich people in the USA do not cause world hunger. In fact, they provide a lot of help to the world's hungry, both in terms of increasing awareness and generating funding.

      If ICANN were left to its own devices to fund 'projects' like Google, such 'projects' (Google is very much a profit-making business, not a 'project') would likely never come into existence. This is nothing against ICANN, but let's face it, nobody is more stingy with a dollar than a venture capitalist. The same cannot be said about non-profits, because there just isn't the same level of competition out there in the np space.

      If you look at the distribution of wealth throughout the world, it is easy to say that economic inequity is the cause of hunger. But in fact the cause of hunger is the simple lack of productive economies in hunger-stricken regions. Why isn't Afghanistan competing with India and China in the tech sector? Culture plays a big part in the equation. If the Taliban says that you can't have a computer or any modern means of making money, of course you'll be poor in the modern world.

      The source of the economic inequity between nations is largely a result of the laws that govern patents and trade, which are themselves a product of the nation's culture. Don't take for granted the combination of good ideas and good luck that gave us our western system of government. It is what makes this discussion possible at both the idiological and the technological level.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    2. Re:Something wrong with making the people rich by mr_don't · · Score: 2

      Capitalism is the economic system of choice in the world's richest nation. What should we do with that wealth? Whatever we want! That's why it's called a free society.

      It's not a Free Society for everyone in this country. Many American Blacks and Asians face major economic inequity. In West Oakland, CA, the percentage of people who can't pay their mortgage is up around 60%. The amount of children who live under the poverty line in Alameda County CA is staggering - around 40%!

      Rich people in the USA do not cause world hunger.

      Again, I would have to disagree with this. A major cause of hunger, is, as you've said, a lack of productive economies in hungry nations. But rather than pursue fair trade with producers in other nations, the small minority of people in the United States who control our trade policies (who I would call "Rich people in the USA") insist on subsidizing US farm crops (and dumping them all over the world) while forcing developing nations to export luxury crops to the US (like coffee - 1% of the world's arable land is used for coffee). The WTO and the World Bank, major tools of developed industrial nations, heavily favor the interests of the United States and Europe. The United States especially poor when it comes to pursuing sustainable development... Do you actually believe that wealthy interests in the US have a positive effect on world hunger? Exporting cheap food to poor countries destroys local economies (outcompeting local farmers!), the same way that a Wal-Mart comming to your town destroys local businesses...

      In fact, they provide a lot of help to the world's hungry, both in terms of increasing awareness and generating funding.

      You must be speaking about these people, otherwise, I think the wealthy in the US need to learn a lot about fundraising for the impoverished...

      If ICANN were left to its own devices to fund 'projects' like Google, such 'projects' (Google is very much a profit-making business, not a 'project') would likely never come into existence.

      Hunh? How did any of the following come about: Apache, Linux Kernel, GNU utilities, PHP, Perl, The Gimp, GNOME, KDE, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Debian, etc, etc, etc...

      there just isn't the same level of competition out there in the np space.

      Again, what about: GNOME vs. KDE, Apache vs. Anything, Mozilla vs. Konqeror vs. everything else, Linux vs. BSD vs. etc. etc. etc...

      If you look at the distribution of wealth throughout the world, it is easy to say that economic inequity is the cause of hunger. But in fact the cause of hunger is the simple lack of productive economies in hunger-stricken regions. Why isn't Afghanistan competing with India and China in the tech sector?

      A "computer" economy will not feed the people of a developing nation. Who will grow the food? Will those people be a perpetual underclass?

      The source of the economic inequity between nations is largely a result of the laws that govern patents and trade, which are themselves a product of the nation's culture.

      Wrong. The laws that govern patents and trade are dictated not by culture, but by the threat of force and sanctions by more powerful countries. Do you actually think that people in Jamaica, the Phillipines, or China want to be used as cheap labor for European and American tastes? What about Cuba? Do you think that the culture of Cuba dictates their economic situation? Or was if force from the United States?

      It is what makes this discussion possible at both the idiological and the technological level.

      People in non-western countries also talk freely about politics, technology, and other issues... I myself am Persian, and persians love to talk politics... It seems like you have been watching too much Fox News Network... In the United States, there is no guarantee of free discussion about political issues, as the squelching of public dissent in the face of ridiculous media conglomeration. Our current Federal Legislature and Presidential Administration is not exactly

      For more information check out: the EFF, and FAIR...

    3. Re:Something wrong with making the people rich by rnd() · · Score: 2
      Not that your comment was a productive addition to the discussion, but I'll respond anyway:

      I posted the opinions I posted not because I am absolutely convinced that they are true. In fact, I'm only partially convinced that they are true, which is why I posted them in a discussion with someone who obviously disagrees.

      I invite you or anyone else to put forth an argument that will change my mind. In fact, I want to have my mind changed on these issues.

      The problem is, lots of people are out there claiming that capitalism is bad, but none who I've spoken to can articulate in a meaningful way why it is bad. Sure people are starving. Show me how capitalism is responsible for that. If you can point this out logically and intelligently argue against all of the counter-arguments, then I'm sure you will change the mind of any rational person who reads your response, including myself.

      Unfortunately, you can't do any of that stuff. It may not be within your ability level, or you may not care enough about the issue to attempt it.

      Let me guess, you are an angry white male with little or no college education who wants to find something to blame his failures on, anonymously.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    4. Re:Something wrong with making the people rich by rnd() · · Score: 2
      It's not a Free Society for everyone in this country. Many American Blacks and Asians face major economic inequity. In West Oakland, CA, the percentage of people who can't pay their mortgage is up around 60%. The amount of children who live under the poverty line in Alameda County CA is staggering - around 40%!

      So you are saying that the poor people you mention would rather live under communism? Let me inform you that many whites also live under major economic inequality. Economic inequality is a reality of life in a capitalistic society. Those who work hard and strive to make the most out of their lives will tend to rise above poverty and enter the middle class. Why do you think immigrants fight to come to the US? It is because the US offers unparalleled opportunity. How many people are fighting to live in Cuba or China? On my last cab ride in Philadelphia the cab driver who barely spoke English had an O'Reilly book on web programming. What a country!

      Again, I would have to disagree with this. A major cause of hunger, is, as you've said, a lack of productive economies in hungry nations. But rather than pursue fair trade with producers in other nations, the small minority of people in the United States who control our trade policies (who I would call "Rich people in the USA") insist on subsidizing US farm crops (and dumping them all over the world) while forcing developing nations to export luxury crops to the US (like coffee - 1% of the world's arable land is used for coffee). The WTO and the World Bank, major tools of developed industrial nations, heavily favor the interests of the United States and Europe. The United States especially poor when it comes to pursuing sustainable development... Do you actually believe that wealthy interests in the US have a positive effect on world hunger? Exporting cheap food to poor countries destroys local economies (outcompeting local farmers!), the same way that a Wal-Mart comming to your town destroys local businesses...

      If low prices are more important than a shop owner who knows everyone's name, people will go to Wal-Mart. If making a bit more per hour is more important than preserving the local economic traditions, then people will go to work in the next American factory that is built. It's a matter of people choosing A over B. This brings me to my point about culture. If those 3rd world nations had a vibrant culture that prioritized preserving the local economies through legislation, then the Big Evil Americans wouldn't want to build factories there in the first place.

      You must be speaking about these people [foodfirst.org], otherwise, I think the wealthy in the US need to learn a lot about fundraising for the impoverished...

      Look at the combined giving of the Gates Foundation and the Ford Foundation. Compare that total to the amount donated by all communist nations combined. Which system is more effective at producing positive results for the world's needy?

      Hunh? How did any of the following come about: Apache, Linux Kernel, GNU utilities, PHP, Perl, The Gimp, GNOME, KDE, OpenBSD, FreeBSD, NetBSD, Debian, etc, etc, etc...

      These are all qualitatively different from Google. Running Google requires tons of bandwidth, tons of hardware, and a full time staff of developers in order to remain competetive. I did not notice any OSS search engines on your list. Sure, an OSS search engine would be possible, but only if someone donated the bandwidth, hardware, etc... If someone donated all that stuff to Google, it could become a non-profit. Unforunately, nobody did and so Google has to resort to being a profit-seeking business.

      Wrong. The laws that govern patents and trade are dictated not by culture, but by the threat of force and sanctions by more powerful countries. Do you actually think that people in Jamaica, the Phillipines, or China want to be used as cheap labor for European and American tastes? What about Cuba? Do you think that the culture of Cuba dictates their economic situation? Or was if force from the United States?

      Where are the revolutions that overthrow the regimes that enforce this poor quality of life? Where is the vision and the struggle for independence from tyrany? They don't exist. Why do Cubans not just tolerate but love Castro? Why do the majority of Chinese tolerate burocracy and communism and not demand a free society? The answer is, these nations lack the cultural technology to create change. By technology I mean the ideas of the French philosophers, British common law, and vision of the founding fathers of our nation.

      People in non-western countries also talk freely about politics, technology, and other issues... I myself am Persian, and persians love to talk politics... It seems like you have been watching too much Fox News Network... In the United States, there is no guarantee of free discussion about political issues, as the squelching of public dissent in the face of ridiculous media conglomeration. Our current Federal Legislature and Presidential Administration is not exactly

      I don't think many people count on the mainstream media for their views on politics or the world. All media is biased in one way or another. The point is that we're all free to be biased in our own way. Nobody is going to be put in jail for having a particular belief.

      I think you seriously underestimate the good things about the USA. Of course it has flaws, and I applaud you for pointing some of them out. But if you think Communism would be a better answer, the be careful what you wish for.

      The role of government is to give businesses the ground rules to operate in a completely self-interested manner and still act ethically. As we have learned from Enron, there is still a long way to go, but at least we have a system under which it will eventually be possible.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  148. Question - How to avoid feature creep ? by willamowius · · Score: 2

    The ultra lean user interface is a key factor for Googles success. Now that Google grows and more and more people are working there, how do you deal with the feature creep of "can we add this here and that there" ?

    Some new features are great, but how do you draw the line to keep that lean interface ?

  149. How often do you crawl frequently changing sites? by labrinid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was amazed to find out that the new site for Elizabeth Smart was crawled by Google (and ranked first) within only a few days from the kidnapping (and the site being registered). CNN pages are also routinely showing up in Google within hours of being published.

    My question is: how do you estimate the rate of change for each site and how often do you crawl frequently updated sites (and update the index)? What is the range of re-crawl (few hours to one month?).

    thanks a lot,
    alex

    PS: Congrats for the Webbys.

  150. Mozilla Toolbar Support by Hector73 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Any plans to release a Google Toolbar for Mozilla 1.0?

  151. Google Groups by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 2

    Google also tends to succeed where others have failed--take for instance Google Groups, formerly DejaNews. What motivated that purchase? Google also seemed very interested in augmenting the USENET archive with missing data, by hunting down CDs and other media that were published years before DejaNews started its archive--that seems like a genuine desire to preserve USENET for the ages, so what inspired that? Lastly as a corollary, Google Groups is missing one feature that DejaNews used to implement, but eliminated a year or so before it went down: Deja had been keeping archives of the text posts in alt.binaries.* groups, which can be valuable since many groups have active text discussion; will Google ever re-introduce the ability to search the text messages in the alt.binaries.* hierarchy that Deja used to offer, even if it's limited to the old archive Deja had?

    --

    Chasing Amy
    (We all chase Amy...)
    "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
  152. Site locations by rhaig · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How many physical sites do you use to host your systems? And is this due to network redundancy issues, disaster management issues, or simply realestate issues? If they're all in one site, is it because you feel things are easier to manage that way, or is it a limitation some crazy developer didn't think of?

    What I'm getting at is I'd love to work for google, and actually like some of the current job postings, but I don't want to move to California. (don't get me started on the reasons) If Gogle had sites in other locations, wouldn't it make sense to hire local admins to go deal with situations there? And thus the concept of the Google branch office is born...

    --
    "We are not tolerant people. We prefer drastically effective solutions"
  153. Content Filtering by telstar · · Score: 2

    Google, along with other search engines, filters content for explicit content. Is there any other type of content that Google has considered, or currently filters as a matter of practice, and what led to this decision?

  154. Database solution by BurningSpiral · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Could you tell us a little about the back end of your search eangine. It's extremely fast. What database software do you use? What optimisations have you implemented at the Operating System level (cluster sizes, Raw IO...)? What type of hardware do you use (Disk drives, Raid, CPU(s)...)? How do you handle load balancing/redundancy?

  155. The real question on everyones mind by Narkov · · Score: 2, Funny

    A/S/L?

  156. Google cracked? by Max+the+Merciless · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm interested to know whether Google has ever been sucessfully cracked? (errrm, perhaps this is sensitive info)

    How often do you detect cracking attempts?

    If this occurs what do you do about it?

    Thanks

    --
    * * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
  157. How does Goggle raise money? by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    You forgot the most important question.

    Are there any plans to make a profit? Yeh I know paying divendends are unpopular with tax accounts, but VCs eventually do eventually say no. So I assume one day Google will have to make enough money to at least pay for its self.

    Afterall logging onto Google doesn't seem stimulate half a dozen porn 'n casino pages popping up, so that arn't getting their fractions of a cent that way.

  158. How does Google take it? by crashnbur · · Score: 2
    Okay, so we know that a web site servicing [enter insanely high number here] requests per minute and referencing [enter insanely high number here] web pages and boasting an insanely high bandwidth needs, well, a little bit more than what I'm writing from to get it done. My question: What's in Google's closet? What are the technical specs of the machines working behind the scenes? What are the limits?

    How does Google do so much so smoothly?

  159. Will you donate to the Wayback Machine? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2

    How about giving a server?/Rackmount thing to the Wayback machine, so we can use the power of Google to navagate into the past! (their search sucks) Come to think of it, so does /.'s!

  160. adwords by bilbobuggins · · Score: 2

    maybe this isn't the right guy to ask this question, but i've always wondered, was something like AdWords planned from the start or did you guys have to throw them up in a hurry because you found yourself low on cash?
    also, are there more plans for parts of Google like this that are strictly to make money or is most of the new coding focused on projects like what can be found on the labs page?
    is there ever any tension deciding what to focus on, things that make money or things that are useful or cool? do the engineers have any input or are these all management decisions?

  161. OT: IE6 by crisco · · Score: 2
    IE6 is a significant upgrade, it is the first IE/Win browser to come significantly closer to implementing W3C standards correctly. Unfortunately it's 'standards mode' is only on when the correct doctype is declared, leaving it acting like the old IE browsers for most of the pages out there. But at least now pages can be standards compliant and get closer to looking the same across standards compliant browsers.

    And yes, IE6 is WinXP, IE5 is Win98 SE, IE4 is Win98. I think Win2k shipped with IE5 and WinME shipped with 5.5 but I could be mistaken.

    --

    Bleh!

  162. Google Answers (http://answers.google.com) by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2

    What and When are you planning to to do about the frauds being perpetuated on Google Answers (http://answers.google.com) with questioners paying their own alias instead of the expert poster who deserves to be paid. They are destroying the cedibility of what has the potential to be an absolutely brilliant service.

    I think you need to be a much more strigent about suspending and banning these abusers if you wish this service to take off.

  163. Re:I can answer this question for them by Ravagin · · Score: 2

    I don't think so. There are easy ways to turn off styling for NS4, leaving the page usable but not so pretty. Anyway, I think it's still possible to make it look good in ns4.

    NS4 doesn't deserve any love from us web creators anyway....

    --

    Karma: T-rexcellent.

  164. Google Answers by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2


    There is the Google Answers Service (answers.google.com) only problem is it riddled with frauds.

  165. Cache and Copyright by Hellkitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There has been discussions about the legality of caching material that is copyrighted, do you have any thoughts of this?

    Have you considered any technical solutions to this problem?

    eg: a cache.txt file that tells robots if their allowed to cache a site as opposed to robots.txt that tells if they're allowed to index the site. Or perhaps the other way around that people can have a cache.txt that tells robots that they are allowed to cache a site. This would let people opt-in instead of opt-out and would also eliminate a lot of unnessesary pages. (I wouldn't mind if you cached my homepage but I won't expect anyone to be interested in the cached copy)

    --
    - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
  166. Hardware failures by Tet · · Score: 2
    Google has around 10,000 rack-mount servers.

    This begs the question... how do they cope with hardware failures? Even using the wildly exaggerated MTBF figures published by manufacturers, that's a significant number of failures *every* day. Does Google have dedicated hardware techs running round replacing broken drives, fried memory and faulty power supplies?

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  167. Alias by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 2

    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=34509& cid=3742297

  168. MOD PARENT UP by Phrogz · · Score: 2

    This deserves more than a 3. PNG really is the lossless image format of the future, and needs adoption on as many fronts as possible.

  169. PNG files in the image archive? by Phrogz · · Score: 2

    Google's image archive is fantastic, but it seems to only archive PNG and JPG files. Given Google's general trailblazing attitude on algorithms and technology, it would seem appropriate that more media would make it into the archive than just these legacy formats, like PNG files.

    Google is crawling Word docs and PDF files nowadays...what other media types are in store for the future?

    1. Re:PNG files in the image archive? by Phrogz · · Score: 2

      Ack...of course I meant to write "...to only archive GIF and JPG files"

      Please correct the question appropriately if it makes it high enough to be submitted.

      PS - Hi Craig! :)