Slashdot Mirror


A Selective History Of The Keyboard

Anonymous Gimp writes "Today's keyboards aren't what they used to be, no sir! Back in my day, we had our BS technology; our keyboards had chassis which allowed 'em to be thrown off a 3-story building and still work - barely dented. Yes those were the days. Now we've got these newfangled Wireless Ergonomic E-Mail button membrane keyboards. To heck with them, I say!"

436 comments

  1. You can say a lot of bad things about MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But, I sure do love their natural keyboards and optical mice. They feel great and they work great, and that's really all they need to do. And the keyboard has USB ports so I can plug the mouse in it! (Yes, I know Apple's had something similiar for years.)

    1. Re:You can say a lot of bad things about MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can? OK, they suck :-D hehehehehe

    2. Re:You can say a lot of bad things about MS by Jagasian · · Score: 3, Informative

      Are you kidding me? Microsoft uses whats known as "foam keyswitches" in their Natural Elite keyboards. Do a little research on keyboard technology and you will find that foam keyswitches are the cheapest, crapiest, most error prone type of keyswitches! Foam keyswitches don't last long, so plan on buying a new keyboard every few years. Foam keyswitches are very sensitive to moisture. Get them even the slightest bit wet, and you can forget it. Don't even get me started on the poor tactile feedback, the keystroke "bounce" errors, and the keystroke "sticking" and unrecognized keystroke errors... all of which occur with foam keyswitches.

      Doing a little more research on the technologies and you will see why Microsoft uses foam keyswitches. Its not because they are quiet because a better more durable keyswitch technology with better tactile feedback exists: rubber dome keyswitches. No, Microsoft uses foam keyswitches in their keyboards because they are the cheapest. It saves them money because the average user doesn't know a damn thing about computers. Buzz words like CPU frequency numbers, RAM capacity numbers, and harddrive sizes are about the only specs that the average computer user looks for when buying a PC. Keyboards? Keyboard technology? Nah, they won't know any better, just give them foam keyswitches.

      Any writer, programmer, or gamer should definitely keep away from foam keyswitch based keyboards. If you want a quiet keyboard, get a rubber dome keyswitch based keyboard. If you want THE best keyboard money can buy, minus loud typing noise, then go with a buckling spring capacitive switch keyboard.

      Microsoft's mice are another topic in and of itself. Lets just say that compared to Microsoft's keyboards, their mice are pieces of gold! I mean, you can't get worse than a foam keyswitch based keyboard.

    3. Re:You can say a lot of bad things about MS by ObviousGuy · · Score: 1

      Is this an issue with just the decidedly bad Elite series, or is this a problem across all Microsoft keyboards?

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    4. Re:You can say a lot of bad things about MS by ssclift · · Score: 2, Interesting

      About 10 years ago until about 7 years ago their keyboards were made in the U.S.A. or Ireland. I bought two Natural Keyboards in 2000, both made in Taiwan. The crappy keyswitches butchered my hands and the key switches started wearing out within two months so that when you pressed shift or any broad key it would just jam in the "up" position and not go down. That was also a major cause of pain, eventually.

      Now, my hands are 26cm (~11in?) thumb-tip to pinky-finger-tip, so the average keyboard and things like my Logitech "ergonomic" mouse were far too small.

      So I dropped by an ergonomic equipment specialist in Holland and after trying out a bunch of keyboards I spent the dosh, and got a Kinesis Ergo Elan keyboard. For my huge hands it was a good size, and the ultra-light keyswitches and 6 keys under each thumb, all arranged in two bowls, have meant hours of typing without pain. Combine that with a Anir Vertical Mouse and I'm a happy hacker. I made sure work bought be one as well. At home I've got a huge Countour Perfit mouse to fit my hand

      As for my fave keyboard. The Union Bank of Switzerland (now UBS AG) used to be the biggest IT shop in the country. They were even developing their own Unix workstation at one point. They manufactured a keyboard for traders with 4 or 5 extra rows of keys over the normal QWERTY layout plus a number pad, with a 4 line LCD display built in. Talk about lots of short-cut buttons... :-)

    5. Re:You can say a lot of bad things about MS by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      Yea, and thanks to Microsoft, everywhere I look I'll be needing a keyboard tray that's 3 feet by 2 feet. Ever notice that keyboard trays haven't been designed yet for the wavy-style keyboard?

      I've got Happy Hacker thank you, but not for quakin

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    6. Re:You can say a lot of bad things about MS by IXI · · Score: 1

      M$ "natural" keyboards look like you have put them on your stove when it was hot, and you need Billy-Boys hands to use them -- I can't.

      The original apple ergonomic keyboard (where M$ got the idea from) at least had an adjustable angle and no oversized keys.

      --
      He saw some dirty arabs and fired. Too bad it was just some friendly kurds, BBC reporters and his fellow cowboys.
    7. Re:You can say a lot of bad things about MS by jiminim · · Score: 1

      I love my Natural Elite. However it is starting to fail and I have not had it for two years yet. The number pad 2 functions when it feels like. Also something that is wierd, the occasional drop of the keyboard from my chair to the carpet (less than two feet) will render it completely inoperable. Sometimes beating it will make it decide to function again. I am definately not planning on buying another.

    8. Re:You can say a lot of bad things about MS by SilentOne · · Score: 0

      The Anir "mouse" looks pretty interesting, but I would be worried about a lack of presicion with it. Have you had many problems with that, or is it just part of the learning curve?

    9. Re:You can say a lot of bad things about MS by Jagasian · · Score: 2

      As far as I know, all of the Elite series boards are foam keyswitch based keyboards. Microsoft saves lots of money doing that, and in fact, they make more money when you come back to buy a new keyboard after your last MS Elite board stops working because of the shoddy foam keyswitches.

      They do the same thing with their software... I mean, why not try the same practices with their hardware division?

    10. Re:You can say a lot of bad things about MS by ssclift · · Score: 1

      It is a little less precise, but then again I usually have my window manager set up so that I hardly ever reach for the mouse. The ergonomics consultant at the back shop said that the best solution is to use two mice, a conventional and a vertical, then switch about every half hour or so. You can get a "Y" connector that lets you put two on one port.

  2. Tap tap tap by ObviousGuy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While I don't like the gummy feeling of a lot of keyboards that are apparently trying to be 'soft', I am not exactly a fan of the loud clicky types either.

    The keyboard that I've found works best and feels best to me is the original Microsoft Natural keyboard. It is ergonomically designed with no extra frills like app buttons across the top. It's also larger and a little sturdier than the Natural Light keyboards Microsoft is pushing these days with their freaky arrow keys and misaligned Insert/Delete/Home/End/PageUp/PageDown key block.

    Microsoft! Do something good for the users! Bring back the original Natural keyboard!

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Tap tap tap by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Microsoft! Do something good for the users! Bring back the original Natural keyboard!

      I felt the same way that you did and then I got a Natural Pro keyboard. Very nice. Good feel. Same layout on the arrow keys and the Insert/Delete/Home/End/PageUp/PageDown key block. It adds a bunch of keys to do things like bring up e-mail, the web browser, etc. They can all be reprogrammed (can you say "cut, copy, paste"?) and the ones for volume and mute are downright useful as they are. You really should give it a try.

    2. Re:Tap tap tap by BJH · · Score: 2

      I own two IBM 42H1292 keyboards, and they're huge, heavy, clumsy and noisy, but by God, they're TOUGH.

      I love 'em.

      I dread the day when motherboards all move to USB and I won't be able to use my beloved keyboards (hmmm... maybe I should start stocking up on PS2/USB adaptors...)

    3. Re:Tap tap tap by qubit64 · · Score: 1

      What ever happened to Del, Ctrl-C,Ctrl-V(or Shift-Insert), or in a better world, dd, yy, p.

      --
      "Save me jebus!" - Homer Simpson (btw, I'm probably talkin out of me arse)
    4. Re:Tap tap tap by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      What ever happened to Del, Ctrl-C,Ctrl-V(or Shift-Insert)

      Well, Del is not the same as cut (Ctrl-X). In answer to your question, they all work, but I've gotten used to cut, copy, and paste keys on the Sun keyboards at work. My little finger would appreciate the rest from repeatedly pushing the CTRL key for everything.

    5. Re:Tap tap tap by Buck2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      dd, yy, p

      Hah. Nowadays all I ever do is:

      shift-V
      j,j,j, (or whatever)
      y
      cntrl-W l (or whatever)
      j [or k]
      p

      vim r0x045!

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    6. Re:Tap tap tap by qubit64 · · Score: 1
      Well, Del is not the same as cut (Ctrl-X).

      I know. I just couldn't remember what Cut was because I never used it... I'd just copy then clear...

      --
      "Save me jebus!" - Homer Simpson (btw, I'm probably talkin out of me arse)
    7. Re:Tap tap tap by ViXX0r · · Score: 1

      Ah yes - the veritable time-tested Model M keyboard.

      I have several of these myself. I find it uncomfortable to use anything else.

      I need to find a stockpile of them though. You can never have too many.

      --
      University - a box of academia nuts.
    8. Re:Tap tap tap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh great, first post goes to a Microsoft fanboy.

    9. Re:Tap tap tap by lrichardson · · Score: 2
      "The keyboard that I've found works best and feels best to me is the original Microsoft Natural keyboard. It is ergonomically designed with no extra frills like app buttons across the top. It's also larger and a little sturdier than the Natural Light keyboards Microsoft is pushing these days with their freaky arrow keys and misaligned Insert/Delete/Home/End/PageUp/PageDown key block."

      Personally, I liked the old old IBM keyboards ... 24 function keys, and, more importantly, 9 cursor control keys, laid out logically (the center key was 'home').

      Currently, the MCK version is about as close as you can get.

      Plus, massive programability ... when people talk about 'ergonomics', they're generally talking about someone whacking away at the keyboard. Start putting strings (like the entire logon sequence) onto a single key. Most of my functions are probably ~11 keystrokes, but I've had them up to 50+ on occasion. One ALT+PF16, and let it play out for the next few seconds ... that's ergonomic!

      The extra function keys make a dif ... I like the CTRL, ALT, and SHIFT combos, dislike three key combos (esp ALT+CTRL+DEL), and the extra keys mean another 36 two finger combos.

    10. Re:Tap tap tap by Megane · · Score: 2
      You can find plenty of them if you visit thrift stores regularly. One of the best things about them is they can interchangeably take AT and PS/2 cords.

      And then there's the Model M Spacesaver, which has the numeric keypad removed. Not quite as deadly as a weapon, and most don't have removable keycaps, but great when you don't have a lot of room left on your desk.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    11. Re:Tap tap tap by lightcycler · · Score: 1

      Once you paint over the microsoft logo, and label the bottom-row of keys "Ctrl", "Penguin", Meta" ..., it can be quite nice to use.

    12. Re:Tap tap tap by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      I use a Microsoft Natural Elite keyboard myself.

      It does take some getting used to but after using this keyboard for a while when you go back to a regular keyboard the feel is very uncomfortable indeed. This is due to the fact on regular keyboards the wrist is not in the straight position, which makes for uncomfortable long-term typing.

    13. Re:Tap tap tap by Spamalope · · Score: 1
      Yep, I've got 3 of them at home, and another 5-6 at work. I didn't pay more that $5 for any of them. I've never seen a broken one. About all that can happen is losing keytops.

      The small, detachable keyboard controller board inside makes a great mame controller too. Hmm, time to make an Ateroids & Space War controller to go with my 2 player joystick one.

    14. Re:Tap tap tap by uncoveror · · Score: 2

      That article did not mention the "any" key, and many people still get confused looking for it. If you are one of them, here it is. The "any" key is unmarked due to a dispute with its inventor Milton Crane, formerly CEO of Typewriters International of Toledo.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    15. Re:Tap tap tap by jsmaby · · Score: 1

      The ideal keyboard I've found came with my SGI. The clickyness is just perfect, it's easy to clean, there are no windows keys (it's very difficult to find keyboard now without those evil things), and all the letters are interchangable (so after remapping them to dvorak, the topology of the keys isn't all messed up).

      This keyboard is easy to clean, and the labels can't just scratch off like with alot of newer keyboards. I intend this keyboard to last forever.

      --

      Sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.

    16. Re:Tap tap tap by Gossy · · Score: 1

      I had a previous model of the natural keyboard (no app buttons) and that was the guilty one as far as misaligned arrow keys/ insert/del key block.

      I later managed to destroy that keyboard through various years of drinks being spilt etc. and got a new one about 9 months ago. It is complete with app buttons but lo, it has normal arrow keys and insert/del key blocks. So my solution - go and buy yourself a new one :)

    17. Re:Tap tap tap by Maax · · Score: 1

      Speaking of IBM keyboards, I'm scared I'm getting fossilised now -- I managed to read "Selective" as "Selectric" in the story title.

    18. Re:Tap tap tap by Moonshadow · · Score: 2

      I'm not a big fan of "soft" keyboards either, but when my girlfriend got me a Logitech wireless, I didn't hesitate to switch. It's very soft, and doesn't provide the tactile feedback of my trusty '98 HP keyboard, but the wireless is SO nice. It's got a 6 ft range, and weighs only a few ounces. It's great. Once you get used to the feel of the keyboard, it's not that hard to adjust to. Before you're used to it, you miss keystrokes and stuff, but once you're properly adjusted, it's one sweet piece of hardware.

    19. Re:Tap tap tap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The clickyness is just perfect, it's easy to clean, there are no windows keys (it's very difficult to find keyboard now without those evil things).

      If you don't use windows yes. Personally I couldn't stand using windows without one. mainly because I use [win key] + r all the time to bring up the "run dialog".

    20. Re:Tap tap tap by bhhenry · · Score: 1

      I love my NMB "Right Touch" RT8255. Similar tech to the IBM, quieter click but good feedback. Sturdy as hell. The new, little NMBs don't cut it, but I have seen the old ones at used computer parts stores.

      --
      signature not found
    21. Re:Tap tap tap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha. Vim. Here's how a real man would have done it in the days before multiple buffers.

      ma
      G
      mb :r filename
      (find text, yank it using favourite method)
      'a
      p :'b+,$d

    22. Re:Tap tap tap by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      But that wastes a keystroke! =]

      Key-commands and keyboard shortcuts are your friends.

      -Sara

    23. Re:Tap tap tap by dickens · · Score: 1

      I've been using an IBM model M keyboard too for the last year or so. P/N 1391401, dated 1984 (?) The date must be wrong, they didn't have ps-2 jacks back then did they ?

      I love the clickyness. On mine the right arrow has lost it's click though.. I'm going to have to find another one.

      I was pissed when the VT100 came out and I couln't use my VT52 any more because it didn't support all the screen controls new software was using. The VT52's keyboard was great. Light, but clicky. And I've dropped them four feet onto a hard floor and had them still work once I snapped the plastic case back together.

    24. Re:Tap tap tap by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 2
      Ah yes - the veritable time-tested Model M keyboard.

      I have several of these myself. I find it uncomfortable to use anything else.

      I need to find a stockpile of them though. You can never have too many.

      The keyboard I am using right now is an IBM model M. I fell in love with them when I first used a PS/2 (not PlayStation/2), and when I saw a few sitting next to a garbage bin with a bunch of other old cumputer stuff, I decided instantly that it would replace my $99 wireless black keyboard/mouse combo. It took me several hours to clean it, which is strange, because everywhere I worked had specific policies against eating at the computers that they actually enforced. Don't people ever wash their hands?

      I plan to use the other two as spare parts for this one, so that I will never have to use another keyboard again. I never really thought about the need for adapters, though, so I guess I will need to look around for some PS/2->USB adapters. I can see it, in 40 years, still using my model M, plugged into a PS2->USB adapter, plugged into a USB->BSN (BrandSpankinNew) adapter, plugged into a BSN->ESS (EvenShinierStill) adapter, plugged into an ESS->DNL (DirectNeuralLink) adapter, plugged into my brain.

    25. Re:Tap tap tap by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I need to find a stockpile of them though.

      These guys have a bin full of keyboards in their warehouse of various models...IBM Model M, Gateway AnyKey, weird keyboards for terminals and word processors, el-cheapo generics, etc. I even found an Apple Extended Keyboard in there once (still need an ADB cable to hook it to my IIGS). $1 each, and I'd guess that if you ordered over the net, you could ask them to make sure they get you a Model M. (As for me, since they're about a mile from where I work, I can head over there any time. :-) ) You might need to clean it up a little bit, but that's no big deal.

      You could also grab one off of a random eBay seller...I paid $8 that way for the one I'm typing on right now. I paid more for shipping than for the keyboard itself, but $20 for a solid keyboard isn't a bad deal IMHO.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    26. Re:Tap tap tap by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Speaking of IBM keyboards, I'm scared I'm getting fossilised now -- I managed to read "Selective" as "Selectric" in the story title.

      The typing class I took in high school used IBM Correcting Selectric IIIs...does this officially make me an Olde Pfarte now? (1987 doesn't seem that long ago...)

      (Even though the typewriters had one-button error correction and photocopiers were readily available, we still had to learn how to use correcting tape and carbon paper (for copying). Our teacher was a fossil, even then. Still, I got better at typing than I ever would've gotten just by pounding programs from Nibble into my Apple IIe.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    27. Re:Tap tap tap by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Start putting strings (like the entire logon sequence) onto a single key.

      Yeah, that's smart...that way, someone can open Notepad, press a key by accident, and get your password. Programming other stuff into a keyboard is OK, but I don't think I'd want to turn a keyboard into a rootkit.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  3. My keyboard is on my lap by dcstimm · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Since i sit in a lazy boy when on my computer I tend to have the keyboard on my lap, and I am very glad its made of light weight plastic. To bad its not wireless:(

    1. Re:My keyboard is on my lap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My keyboard is on my lap

      You have you keyboard on your lap!
      There does the ergonomics straightaway.

      Though it has to be said that the IBM BS keyboard (covered in the
      article) is much heavier than it needs to be. And in the end it
      "just" has dome switches.

      Give me a keyboard with a proper fibreglass PCB, where the switches a
      soldered on. At least with these I can get in a fix the individual
      switches when they fail .... and plus they are significantly lighter
      than the IBM buckling spring.

  4. I just hate it when.. by mbrix · · Score: 1

    I read half-way through the article and the site gets slashdotted.

    1. Re:I just hate it when.. by cvore · · Score: 1

      Well: Google has chached at least the two first pages: First page and the second :)

    2. Re:I just hate it when.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a mirror:

      http://207.139.42.198/articles/keyboard/keyboard .h tm

  5. The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by Wraithlyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yessir, back in my day we had these incredible keyboards. I have a VIC-20 keyboard and and Commodore 64 keyboard. Some people claimed they were kind of big, but for keyboards, they were sure packed with features! Like computers! :)

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    1. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by Te1waz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, the C64 keypad wasn't bad, as long as you put a pillow in front of it.

      Yup, there were no wrist pads in those days.

      The advantage of the pillow is that you could also put your head on it and take a nap while waiting for things to load off tape.

      --
      From my Autobiography - "Lifestyles of the Sad and Desperate"...
    2. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there were the Amiga A500 and Atari ST - the world's first 32-bit keyboards with built in disk drives.

    3. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by nafmo · · Score: 1

      The problem with the breadbox editions of VIC-20 and C64 is that the angle of the keyboard is too high, which makes it a but uncomfortable to type on them. Slimline C64s are a lot better, and of course the 128D's detachable keyboards are definitely the best.

    4. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by DaveHowe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah - probably didn't see them in the states, but we had something here in the UK called a ZX spectrum - the keyboard was a single, molded piece of rubber; if you had dropped one from a three-story building, you could probably have caught it on the first bounce :)

      --
      -=DaveHowe=-
    5. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by rnielsen · · Score: 1

      What about the portable C64, the SX-64. Detachable keyboard, builtin monitor. Now that was classy.

    6. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by Professor+Nova · · Score: 1

      The Atari 1200XL, the best non-IBM keyboard I've ever used. 20 years and it still works flawlessly. Built like a russian battle tank, tough and reliable.

    7. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by scaryman · · Score: 1

      nah, the ZX-81 no keys , just small flexable indentaions on the top of the unit, now that was fun.

    8. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by Katravax · · Score: 2

      Yup, we had it, but it was called the Timex/Sinclair TS2068. A pic I found via Google search.

    9. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by DaveHowe · · Score: 2

      *grin* although you could *upgrade* it to the Spectrum level - there was a glue-on rubber keyboard mat that would give you the same "look and feel" as a ZX Spectrum; underneath the mat on a real spectrum there was only a membrane keyboard anyhow (not that modern pcs don't use the same design - although they are mostly separate sheets and the zx used a heat-sealed unit)

      --
      -=DaveHowe=-
    10. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by DaveHowe · · Score: 2
      Hmm. I was under the impression the keys on the Timex version were actually plastic - plastic glued to a rubber sheet possibly. Did anyone here actually have one of these beasts?

      Oh - and nostalgia moment. I just went and checked in a cupboard, and my ZX spectrum (with plus keyboard upgrade) is still there, along with a boxfull of game tapes :)

      --
      -=DaveHowe=-
    11. Re:The ultimate keyboard.. the C-64!!! :) by Katravax · · Score: 2

      I had one, and enjoyed it until 1993 or so. I'm pretty sure the keys were rubber, but now that you've given me the seed of doubt, I can't be positive.

  6. Small enter, big pipes by NaCh0 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    As long as I have an IBM PC "workstation" keyboard, with the skinny rectangular Enter key and 2 key wide backslash/pipe key above it, I'm happy.

    1. Re:Small enter, big pipes by wirefarm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Small enter, big pipes

      I think there's a lubricant you can get that will help with that...

      (sorry.)
      Cheers,
      Jim in Tokyo

      --
      -- My Weblog.
  7. The original IBM keyboards rule! by barc0001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, the ones with the steel plates inside? I have 5 of them, 4 in storage, hopefully enough to last the rest of my life. The one I am typing this on is from my IBM AT that I got in 1992. Still going strong..... You can occasionally find them at garage sales(!) and swap meets and such. If you see one, grab it. It is really the best keyboard.

    1. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Helen+O'Boyle · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hear, hear! These clicky-clacky keyboards are great for dancing one's fingers across the keys with a minimum of force while still getting great tactile and audible feedback that yes, the keys you think you hit, really were hit. Nothing quite like them for "sureness" of typing.

      (Do I use one now? No, I don't have one, but if I tripped over one in good condition, I'd probably buy it. By the way, barc0001, why did you get an AT in 1992? They were quite old by then...)

    2. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Kris_J · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's always someone who goes on about the old IBM keyboards, and while their movement and feedback are greatly superior to $bundled_crapboard they aren't anywhere nearly as comfortable to use as a good ergonomic split keyboard like the original Microsoft Natural or, my current favourite, the Logitech Cordless Desktop Pro.

    3. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      It was my first foray into the PC market after spending the first 12 years (1980-92) in the Microcomputer arena. I started out with a CoCo 1, a Vic 20, then a TI99/4A, then a Coco2. In 1991 I was still using a Coco3, mainly just for dialing up to BBSs. I was working at a pizza restaurant and living in a crappy apartment at the time, and someone offered me a used AT for $150. I thought "what the hell", since I wanted to make the switch to something semi-current... And then after about a week of playing around with the AT, I wanted a 386-33 with a VGA card and a (gasp) IDE drive that I couldn't afford... And so it went. Now I am surrounded by Gigahertz + machines. I still have the Coco 3 in a box in the closet though. And I still use the AT's keyboard with a 5pin-PS/2 converter on my Palomino Athlon.

    4. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      I never really dug the natural/ergo keyboards. Part of it was I never learned to touch type, so the shape of the ergo keyboards is alien enough to really screw with my typing speed. When I type, my hands sort of float over the keyboard and move back and forth. I don't need to look at the keys, but I can't have my hands sitting still on a keyboard... And the old IBM keyboards are really nice for my typing style since I get such definite tactile feedback as I float around.
      But, to each their own. If the Ergo thing works for you, go for it! I notice, however, all the best input peripherals seem to get discontinued. The IBM clicky keyboards, the Microsoft natural, the Logitech mouseman (the curvy one that takes about a week to get used to), and the first Logitech Wingman Force. That was also a tank of a device. Still have mine...

    5. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by mandolin · · Score: 2

      When I put together my pII-era box, I scavenged the keyboard from the PC XT I inherited (I still have the XT too). Only un-feature (besides lack of ergonomics) is the lack of the *lock LEDs. I s'pose IBM figured that if you could use DOS 3.2, you could figure out if caps was on.

    6. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by fruey · · Score: 2
      They don't rule for the home or office if you are in close proximity to other people. They make far too much noise.

      They do have a good response to touch, and you do have a "positiveness" about keyclick, but it's obnoxious in an environment within earshot of other users.

      Solution:-
      Get a quiet keyboard, a set of headphones, and program Windows to make a click every time you type a key.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    7. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by danielrose · · Score: 0

      Ha.
      I just threw out a 20ft shipping container filled with those very click click IBM keyboards..
      You should have spoken sooner and you could have had some!

      --
      i hate pansy republicans
    8. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by hero_or_what · · Score: 1

      I have a SUN Ultra 10 and a HP vectra at my workplace. The HP Vectra has a "normal" keyboard layout but the SUN keyboard has the capslock and control keys exchanged. In addition keys like ESC are in different positions.

      I'm comfortable with both but I send mail and reply to /. on my HP m/c. Most of my coding (and debugging :-) is on SUN. So, when I type long sentences I'm used to having ctrl on the top but when I code, its the other way around.

      I've got so used to having 2 different keyboards for two different things, I find it difficult to code on the wrong keyboard!!

      I wonder what the poor souls who have both DVORAK and QWERTY do?

    9. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by flonker · · Score: 1

      I've got one of those. Pulled it out of a dumpster one fine Chicago evening. I then had a friend pass out while he was in front of my system, and knocked my monitor on top of the keyboard. I had already crawled into bed, with a nice solid buzz, so I was very unhappy when I woke up in the morning to find him there, and my keyboard with two keys broken off (F12 and F10).

    10. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We try to get people to switch do DVORAK, so we don't have to deal with it anymore! :-)

    11. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by andreas · · Score: 1

      Oh the pain!

      This reminds me of when I've heard about an 8-processor Alpha machine with a gigabyte of RAM and a lot of fast SCSI busses being thrown out...

    12. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by ianezz · · Score: 2

      Well, go to PCKeyboard and buy yourself one. PCKeyboard is the ex keyboard division of IBM and Lexmark, and still has tons of old keyboards (and new ones as well).

    13. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that has got to be the shittiest solution I have ever heard.

      Wear headphones for christs sake !

      the IBM is not so bad in my office or home, maybee your has sucky acoustics as well as morons for employees ?

    14. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by The+Impossible · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you... (have several of them myself, even one at work) but I doubt that my coworkers do...

      At this moment we have 2 persons in de office with the real stuff andthe others with compaq keyboards. I know, the IBM keyboards are a bit noisy, but hey, the keys are at least were you expect them to be.

      I would suspect that the old IBM keyboards were designed with sysadmins in mind and the current (I'm now typing on a new IBM terminal keyboard) with officemanagers, secretaries etc. etc. in mind. Those keys are a lot smaller and a lot easier to mis.
      Are they trying to drive the costs of operating computers up by adding smaller keyboards to induce more typos so you need more time for corrections?

      --
      ... Wenn ist das Nunstruck git und Slotermeyer? Ja!... Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    15. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Trinton+Azaleth · · Score: 1

      I still have the leftover parts from my old IBM around somewhere. That steel plate is one cool chunk of metal! :-D

    16. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by CharlieG · · Score: 4, Informative

      And you can BUY the original PC keyboard to this day - NEW - I put one on every system I own

      www.pckeyboard.com

      They are the old IBM keyboard division!

      Look for the 104 key, buckling spring keyboard - they call it the "Customizer"

      If you want a keyboard that can be customized for Linux, look at their 104 key model

      Standard disclaimer - no relation to them except a happy customer

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    17. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by M.+Silver · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah. Our church just had sixty-some Compaq DeskPros donated for our garage sale ($20 got you at least a P133, 16MB, 1.1GB, keyboard, mouse, 14" monitor, and 95 license... the local Linux users group members are buying 'em up five at a time), and out of a large number of Compaq and Dell keyboards, there was one lonely IBM keyboard.

      It is *so* mine now.

      --

      Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
    18. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Keith+Mickunas · · Score: 2

      I just picked up a 1992 Ps/2 model that's in primo condition from a used computer store for $3! I had to steal some keycaps from some foreign language keyboards to make it complete, and it only took a little bit of work to clean off some dirt. After that, it looks and works great.

    19. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by fruey · · Score: 1

      It was a joke *sigh*

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    20. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by zrodney · · Score: 1

      bah -- split ergonomic garbage. I always end
      up trying to press the space bar with my thumb
      and there's nothing there!

      then since I'm a touch typist, often a finger will
      cross from one side to the other because all the
      other fingers have just typed something, and it's
      easier to just use the other hand for a Y or U or G

      but with a split ergo keyboard, you just end up
      pressing the blank part of the keyboard and stop
      typing again.

      the only worse keyboard I've used is touch typing
      on a devorak keyboard in the dark.

      if you want to get old school keyboards, how about
      those old VT100 DEC terminals -- they had nice keyboards.

      the worst keyboard is a tie between the atari 800
      membrane and the timex sinclair which is about the
      size of a ten pack of cds.

    21. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by waspleg · · Score: 1

      unfortunately at $100 a pop i can buy 10 throw-away cheapo windows keyboards from compusa

      and yes i spill enough to coke to make buying in bulk necessary

    22. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by MoTec · · Score: 1

      I've got three of 'em right now. Two of the original M models and one black one with a built-in eraser-mouse.

      I learned to type on an old IBM Selectric typewriter and this keyboard has the same feel. I just hope my keyboards last 'till my fingers stop wiggling.

    23. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by donweel · · Score: 1

      Model M forever. Just got one at a dime store. As soon as I hefted that thing I could tell it was somthing of quality. Reminds me of the old IBM Selectric I used to type reports on in tech school. Once, we were able to read the ribon tape after the instructor used it to type an exam. Methinks to go back and buy the lot of them just to have a supply, though I doubt this one will ever break.

      --
      Many a long talk since then I have had with the man in the moon; he had my confidence on the voyage. Joshua Slocum
    24. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by micahjd · · Score: 2
      They don't rule for the home or office if you are in close proximity to other people. They make far too much noise.

      If you can hear your Model M, it just means your CPU fan isn't loud enough!

      --
      -- 2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2
    25. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2
      I notice, however, all the best input peripherals seem to get discontinued. The IBM clicky keyboards, the Microsoft natural, the Logitech mouseman (the curvy one that takes about a week to get used to), and the first Logitech Wingman Force.

      And the big Microsoft mouse - IntelliMouse Pro? I liked it because it was big, and you could rest your hand on it, rather than having to hold your hand above the mouse. It fit my hand really nicely in the 'resting' position.

      And I know what you mean about the MS Natural Keyboard - when they crippled the layout for the MS Natural Elite keyboard and discontinued the original I was very pissed off. I recall they did it so that it would fit in those crappy keyboard drawers.

      Luckily they eventually brought out the MS Natural Keyboard Pro which is festooned with those 'internet keys' but has the one true layout. After having one for a year, I actually use the extra keys now (volume up/down and email, to be honest).

      The feel is different, and I guess I slightly prefer the older one, but there's not much in it. At least the new one seems to use double injection keys (at bloody last!) - my old MS Natural has the characters worn off E A S D and C keys - they're virtually blank. At the price they charged in those days (I got one when they first came out), you'd expect them to use double injection keycaps.

      Still, a nice keyboard.

      What I'd really like is a wireless keyboard, but Logitech keep fucking up the layout for no apparent reason. Their current wireless keyboard has the PgUp/PgDn 3x2 block re-arranged to a 2x3 block. Agh! I lasted 1.5 days with that. The closest I've ever come to throwing a piece of computer equipment out of the window. And remember, because it was wireless, I could :-). However, at the time I was 2 storeys up in Covent Garden in central London, so it wouldn't have been a good idea. I did really love the way I could take the keyboard off my desk and put it somewhere else, and just use a large pad and pencil when I wanted to do some design. But the key layout from hell had to go, especially as I learned the CUA keys for cut/copy/paste years ago, which use Insert and Delete, and it's taking me years to switch to Ctrl-C/V etc.

      I also don't like the lack of LEDs on wireless keyboards - I guess it's a battery life problem.

      Tim

    26. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 2

      If you were typing at the dos/DOS command line, you didn't care if the caps key was on. DOS was case iNSenSiTiVe.

    27. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Caez · · Score: 0

      yeah, my IBM keyboard is typing this in right now. great keyboards.

      --
      http://www.mistersampo.com
    28. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 2

      I've been using the AT keyboards since 1984! I've also got a lifetime supply of spares. I'm also eternally baffled why anyone would move the function keys away from the left side of the keyboard where they can be touch typed. Why, I can type SHIFT-CTRL-F8 with one hand tied behind my back and never lift my thumb from the space bar.

    29. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      I have two of the old-style IBM keyboards, I think they are from an IBM PC or maybe an XT. The difference between these and the buckling spring Model M is like the difference between the Model M and a clone keyboard. They're so heavy it's not true :-).

      But alas, they don't work with any modern system. The big DIN keyboard plug is the same shape as on the PC-AT but the interface is completely different. I'm surprised that you got your XT keyboards working, perhaps there is a difference between the IBM PC keyboard and the PC-XT keyboard. I know there was some change between the PC and the PC-AT, hence the incompatibility. (But between AT and PS/2 there is no big change in keyboard interface, despite the new smaller plug.)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    30. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You know, the ones with the steel plates inside

      I prefer the light weight almost metal-free keyboards. They don't make my knees go numb when I work with my feet on the desk.

    31. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by spudnic · · Score: 1

      Do you have a model number or something on the keyboard with the eraser mouse? I'd really like to get one of these.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    32. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by orasio · · Score: 1

      Many of the IBM keyboards (at least PS/2 type) were made by Lexmark.

    33. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by klui · · Score: 1

      I have the best of both worlds--the physically split keyboard with tenting manufacturered by IBM (later Lexmark), called the Select Ease. It's not heavy like the old IBM PC/AT keyboards, but still has the same tactile feel but with the ergonomics that's superior to the Microsoft version because the pieces are separate and adjustable. My trackball is in-between which enables me to use either hand to control the mouse.

    34. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      I have several keyboards from pckeyboard.com. However, the model M keyboard I bought from them differs from the IBM-branded model M that I bought brand-new at a blowout sale back in 1995 or so. The IBM-branded one is heavier and has removable keycaps. The PCkeyboard.com one does not. Other than that though, the feel is very similar. They are the same technology (Buckling Spring). To be fair, the pckeyboard.com one is a ja_JP layout, while the IBM one is an en_US layout, so they were definately from different batches.

      Recently, I have switched to using a Sun Type 6 USB keyboard (UNIX layout) on my AMD Athlon Linux machine. It's got control and escape and backspace in the right places without running any software hacks. The only drawback is that it requires USB.

      I've also used the Happy Hacking keyboards, but the only one I really liked the feel of was the $139 Original Happy Hacking Keyboard. The $69 HHKB Lite and Lite 2 feel like crappy PC keyboards, even though they have the right layout.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    35. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Helen+O'Boyle · · Score: 1

      Lock LED's are for wimps who use lock keys.

      I never (intentionally) use a caps-lock key. I got so pissed at triggering the caps-lock key on my Dell Inspiron accidentally that I found a utility to just neuter the darn thing. Now it behaves as a normal shift key, not a caps-lock. (Just curious... Do you code in FORTRAN IV? Do you send lots of spam about a kid named Craig who wants cards? Why do you need a shift lock?)

    36. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      Okay, wow. I have just noticed that pckeyboard.com is selling a "Linux layout" keyboard. Here is the link.

      Don't look at the picture on that page. The picture is of the standard layout. The PDF files below show the alternate Linux layouts available.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    37. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by CharlieG · · Score: 2

      Yes, Lexmark

      Time for a bit of history for you

      IBM Made their original keyboards - At one point, IBM decided to spin off their Printers and keyboards to a seperate company - they called it Lexmark

      A few years later, and Lexmark sold off their keyboard division - That is PCKeyboards.com

      Long before they had a net site, I found them (I called Lexmark looking for a keyboard - and Lexmark pointed me there) , and was given the story on the phone - BTW they used to run a special on their keyboards with the IBM logo, as IBM wasn't buying that model any more

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    38. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      There's always someone who goes on about the old IBM keyboards, and while their movement and feedback are greatly superior to $bundled_crapboard they aren't anywhere nearly as comfortable to use as a good ergonomic split keyboard like the original Microsoft Natural...

      Ick...when I worked as a tech at Best Buy, those keyboards were foisted on us at the front bench. It took forever to get up to anything approximating a respectable typing speed, and I never was able to type as quickly or accurately on one of them as I can with a regular keyboard. (One of them also had the hideous diamond-pattern arrow keys...whoever was responsible for that abomination should be drawn and quartered.)

      You can have my Model M after you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    39. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      the worst keyboard is a tie between the atari 800 membrane

      The 400 had the membrane "keyboard." The 800 had a keyboard with real keys.

      The chiclet keyboard on the CoCo wasn't that great, either. The CoCo 2 and CoCo 3 were built with real keyboards.

      IIRC, the TI-99/4 (not 99/4A) had calculator keys for its keyboard (not too surprising, seeing how TI was (and still is) one of the biggest calculator manufacturers). The 99/4A had a real keyboard...a small one with only 40-some-odd keys, but it used real keys.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    40. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by mandolin · · Score: 1
      Do you code in FORTRAN IV? Do you send lots of spam about a kid named Craig who wants cards? Why do you need a shift lock?)

      Fair enough question. Usually I use it when typing in C #define constants, when there's not enough to bother remembering what emacs' capitalize-region command is.

    41. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by mandolin · · Score: 1

      I dunno, man. I use an ATPS/2 adaptor, apparently it works for XTs too. Never tried to get an original PC keyboard hooked up.

    42. Re:The original IBM keyboards rule! by MoTec · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, I do. It's model number: 13H6705. It also says 'Plt No 1 - Model M13'. I'm pretty sure it was originally sold with a IBM thinkpad docking station.

      Good luck.

  8. Sturdy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi me Ugh, Just finish learn typing... need woman, use 10lb keyboard as club, and cord to tie her up for easy trasport. Key board good idea. And now one understands why the keyboard has progressed along with modern man. Note: this is a joke, I actually would prefer a heavy (but wireless) key board, since I am a klutz.

  9. CVT Avant Prime by crosbie · · Score: 1

    Yup, the Avant Prime keyboard is the one I use (by Creative Vision Technologies, Inc.)

    I even put up with a US layout (have to do ALT 0163 for the pounds sterling symbol).

    1. Re:CVT Avant Prime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I even put up with a US layout (have to do ALT 0163 for the pounds sterling symbol).

      Uhhhhh, you are aware of a concept known as "Keymaps", arn't you?

    2. Re:CVT Avant Prime by crosbie · · Score: 1

      What? You mean getting a key to generate a different character from the one that's printed on it?

      Sounds confusing.

      If you'd like to tell me where I can get all the different key tops too then I might be interested, but it's not that big a deal.

    3. Re:CVT Avant Prime by crosbie · · Score: 1

      You know, I had a feeling you'd propose bits of card and glue or sticky tape, or some such.

    4. Re:CVT Avant Prime by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > What? You mean getting a key to generate a different
      > character from the one that's printed on it?

      The keytops on Avant keyboards are interchangeable (well,
      ones that are the same size are interchangeable). That
      doesn't get you a pounds symbol, but you can always use
      white-out and ink to make your own keytop display. Though
      if you often look at the keys while typing, you may not be
      enough of a keyboardist to fully appreciate the merits of a
      real quality keyboard.

      The _big_ advantage of Avant keyboards is the full
      remappability and programmability. I've got an Avant
      Stellar, and I've got it remapped to reduce strain on my
      left pinky, by repositioning the frequently-used shift and
      control keys under my left and right pinkies, respectively.
      The semicolon/colon (which is normally where I now have
      ctrl) I moved up to the left square bracket position, and I
      used the right square bracket position for backslash/pipe,
      and moved the square brackets down to bottom-row positions,
      since they are less frequently used. The a key (normally
      where I now have shift) I moved to where k normally is
      between j and l, and the less-frequently-used k I put where
      left shift used to be. I repositioned the left window key
      to the top function-key row, where I can find it easily but
      won't hit it by mistake, turned the right-shift (which I
      never use as such) into an additional backslash/pipe key,
      turned the capslock (which I never use on purpose) into an
      additional control key. The resulting layout takes some
      getting used to, but the frequency with which I have to take
      my pinky out of the home row is *vastly* reduced, which
      makes for more comfort over the long term.

      Of course, you may have your own set of peeves about the
      standard keyboard layout. The point is, with an Avant
      keyboard, you can remedy them. Oh, it does macros, too,
      and with the Stellar model you get an extra set of function
      keys, ripe for macroing.

      One caveat: most remapping can be done with no special
      software, using the hardwired key sequences, but if you want
      to remap right ctrl, left shift, or 1/!, you need to use the
      included remapping software, which is Win9x-based. I have a
      copy of Win95 on another partition, that I was able to use
      for just such an emergency; this means that I have to reboot
      (before and after) each time I want to make changes to my
      layout, but once I got my layout worked out I don't
      anticipate frequent changes.

      This full remappability/programmability is what makes CVT's
      keyboards special. Yes, they're also quite good quality
      physically; there are reviews out there on the web, so I
      won't duplicate them here. But the versatility is the
      killer feature. I was *happy* to pay more than the usual
      keyboard price for this model. CVT is for keyboards what
      Lian Li is for cases. If you don't think keyboards are a
      big deal, if you're satisfied with your $40 ergonomic
      keyboard (or even with a $9 cheapie), then an Avant may not
      be for you. If you find yourself dissatisfied with the
      shortcomings of traditional keyboard layouts, disgusted with
      the quality of membrane keyboards that succumb to humidity
      and have to be replaced frequently, in general, if you just
      want a better keyboard, I see an Avant model in your future.
      (I'm just a satisfied customer; I have no affiliation with
      the company.)

      The test: if you are looking at a webpage, and need to scroll, do you
      A) Reach for the mouse.
      B) Use the mouse without needing to reach, because your
      hand was on it already.
      C) Keep your hands on the keyboard and use the relevant
      keys to scroll, because they're closer and easier to
      reach than the mouse.
      If you answered C, you will appreciate a quality keyboard.
      If you answered B, you won't care. If you answered A, you
      are a borderline case, and may or may not find a quality
      keyboard worthwhile, depending on your budget.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    5. Re:CVT Avant Prime by crosbie · · Score: 1

      "Though if you often look at the keys while typing, you may not be enough of a keyboardist to fully appreciate the merits of a real quality keyboard. "

      I was using Alt163 before you needed to prefix it with a zero I'll have you know!

      I've had a go at using CVT's Win98 utility to reprogram the 4/$ key to produce £ (UKP), but the software seems a tad flaky. You have a go. Try making Alt-4 or Ctrl-Alt-4 produce Alt-0163.

  10. Why by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    So it can fall on your toes hard?

  11. nostalgic but... by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember with fondness the big old solid metal cased IBM keyboards, I guess the fondness comes from the fact that it was my first pc (well, ok, the companies, but the first one I used). But I would actually much prefer a modern quiet membrane keyboard. I work in an open plan office with desks in clusters of 4, and it's very distracting whne you're trying to pin down a bug and having to think and concentrate but your neighbour is clacking away typing an email (or a slashdot post!) The keyboards we have now are Compaq (well, probably not, but that's what it says on the label) and they are quite noisy when you're typing quickly, and very distracting. My keyboard at home (generic no-name $15.00 membrane keyboard) is much quieter and even has a nicer feel. It has all hose fancy media and internet buttons which I never use, I bought it cuz I needed a new keyboard fats and didn't have much money. I went for the cheapest on the shelf and was actually pleasently surprised.

    The other thing I like about mebrane keyboards is that they're very easy to strip down and clean when the accumulated crud from sandwich crumbs and cake bars gets too much!

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
    1. Re:nostalgic but... by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      I used a $10 keyboard for three years before my girlfriend made me throw it out. She didn't like it and that was that.

      The upgrade was fine in any case. I'm now using this big honking metal keyboard with "Packard Bell" on it as the only redeeming feature. Well that and all of the keys being in the "right" place.

      I even have a "macro" button! But I use vim so it doesn't help.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    2. Re:nostalgic but... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      My first real computer keyboard was an 029 card-punch (none of that wimpoid QWERTY stuff, no sirree!). Anybody remember those? (Yes, I do realise I've just dated myself big-time, but what the hell...) In fact, I've still got one somewhere. It's about the right size and weight to make a good door-stop. I haven't used it for a long time (22 years, to be precise), but I can remember being expected to code assembly and fortran source code directly on to cards just using a pseudocode crib... I don't think I could do that now :-(

    3. Re:nostalgic but... by |<amikaze · · Score: 2

      You think having "Packard Bell" on it is a REDEEMING feature?!?!

    4. Re:nostalgic but... by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. It's not a "redeeming" feature.

      I meant it's "the only feature on it that might be an indicator of what model keyboard it is".

      Salient? Applicable? Noteworthy? I just can't think of the word I want right now.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  12. old ibm keyboards by lingqi · · Score: 1

    while i liked them... my golly ther were LOUD... don't ever think about typing on one of those if somebody is sleeping...

    we had a computer lab full of these before (this is the days of Word Perfect 5.1 for DOS) -- when finals came around and people need to write papers you can hear this deafening roar of metali-plastic spring clicking....

    so -- durable, fine; but for all practical purposes -- i will stick with the original Microsoft Natural (sorry, but it is the most "ergonomic" i found)... might upgrade to one of those fancy type-sideways ones in the future.

    i do think "chord" typing is a good idea (ex: press E,T,S will get you F)... but it just takes so long to learn. one hand operation would be hard, but you can fit a keyboard onto almost everything (i think they should try this for the PDAs and cellphones. have anyone tried the keypads on the SONY NR-70 or the SHARP zauras (sp?) those are tiny and hard (i have stubby fingers). chord-key, though, would work much easier IMHO. sigh... so it probabbly means it wont ever catch on.

    last note: as for regular keyboards, DVORAK is really nice. give it a try -- just a couple monthes... you will wonder why other ppl don't use it either.

    last last note: (heh i lied) -- the dollar bill he used in the pict must be as old as that keyboard controller... heh... i thought it was kinda amusing.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  13. Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For those of you interested in faster and more
    comfortable typing I would just like to say that
    I have been using dvorak for 4 years and I'll
    never go back.

    It takes one or two days before you know aproximately whene all the letters are, and then
    it's just to start typing (without looking) you'll
    have your old typing speed back within a month
    and from there it gets even faster.

    hans AT anti DOT nu

    1. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by PacoTaco · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dvorak superiority is probably a myth.

    2. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by prockcore · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Grr... the article perpetuates the urban legend that qwerty is designed to "slow down the typist".

      That's not true at all! What he found was that when typing quickly on old typewriters, hitting two keys that were right next to each other would jam. So instead of moving keys around to "slow you down" he moved keys around to speed you up! By moving commonly used keys to opposite sides of the keyboard, the typist was able to type quickly without jamming the typewriter.

      It's been shown that dvorak actually makes RSI worse because commonly used keys are hit by the same finger. Where qwerty spreads things out so that all fingers are used frequently, dvorak causes you to use half your fingers far more frequently than the others.

      Also qwerty relies a lot on alternating hands.. this is shown to be much faster than using a single hand to type a word.

    3. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Also qwerty relies a lot on alternating hands.. this is shown to be much faster than using a single hand to type a word."

      I have seen multiple experiments done and nowhere was qwerty ever any faster.

    4. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is _probably_ a myth you say?

      Ofcourse you want to believe in an article such
      as that one because you are using qwerty.

      Learning that qwerty is infact not that bad saves
      you from that annoying feeling that you are using
      an inferior standard, and besides you dont have
      to learn something new =)

      Well I will not tell you what to think. It's up
      to you, but I will state a simple fact:
      Me and a number of my friends have actually
      tested both layouts __for ourselfes__ and none of
      us will use qverty again, ever. :o)

    5. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up!!!! Time to get rid of the stupid QWERTY myth.

    6. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      LOL. Lets state some facts :)

      * The qwerty standard was optimized for typewriters with moving parts that could jam.
      * There are no moving parts in todays keybeards.
      * Just because everybody uses something, it isnt necessarilly the best thing. (think Microsoft :)
      * One of the main principles that dvorak is built on is alternating hands. FYI all vowels are placed on the middle row of the left hand exept for Y which is placed in the upper row. And yes, alternating hands does speed up typing a lot, I wont argue about that =)
      * All letters in the word TYPEWRITER is placed in the upper row on the qwerty keyboard to make it easy for salesmen to type that word when trying to sell typewriter machines to customers. Wow that sounds like a very optimized design if you ask me.
      * Very few people have actually tried dvorak.
      * Everybody I know (including myselfe) who have actually tried dvorak will never change back.

      hans AT anti DOT nu

    7. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by jejones · · Score: 2

      The authors of the cited article have an interest in denying the existence of "path dependence" so that they can argue that the most popular product is always the best. (I'm a libertarian, and have no love of government, but I can't agree to that.) For balance it might also be worth looking at this web page.

    8. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      you stated that there are no moving parts in todays keybeards. 1. Yes there are. 2. What's a keybeard?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by jjc2222 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to point you at this applet. It calculates statistics on bodies of text for Qwerty, Dvorak, and Arensito layouts. I sent your comment through it and here are the stats:

      Qwerty:
      34.07% hit with the same hand (i.e. not alternating) with a finger distribution of:
      7% 10% 16% 22% 21% 6% 11% 2%

      Dvorak:
      25.95% hit with the same hand (i.e. more alternating) with a finger distribution of:
      6% 8% 11% 16% 16% 15% 12% 11%

      That is, Dvorak alternates hands more and more evenly distributes finger use.

      You'll see that statistics close to these hold for longer bodies of English text. Try pasting in a news article and you'll see. What do you have to back up your statements?

    10. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by D_Fresh · · Score: 3, Informative
      The article you link makes several attempts to debase the traditional points made by Dvorak advocates, but as Dvorak typist for 11 years now I can offer a few refutations. First, the article says that QWERTY is, in fact, a more "evolved" standard than was once though, which is to say it underwent iterative refinements that improved its usefulness. I buy this only up to a point. Yes, there were certainly many failed keyboard layouts prior to QWERTY (most had separate keys for caps and lowercase, for instance, and many were alpha order), but I've never read an account that claimed QWERTY was engineered with an eye toward the three cardinal rules of keyboard layout (as stated in the article):

      A. The loads on the right and left hands are equalized.

      B. The load on the home (middle) row is maximized.

      C. The frequency of alternating hand sequences is maximized and the frequency of same-finger typing is minimized.

      If you look at QWERTY, you'll see that A is not satisfied very well at all - many of the most commonly used letters such as A,S,D,F,E,R,T and C are in the left hand. (The article actually states that QWERTY fails at this - 57% to 43% balance between hands.) Condition B is certainly not satisfied either - look at the preponderance of vowels and common letters in the top row. The last condition is the only one that QWERTY comes close to satisfying, but even then try typing words like "exaggerated" or "monopoly" (thanks to Jared Diamond and his April 1997 Discover Magazine article). Dvorak's layout is, in fact, optimized for all three of these conditions, using careful analysis of letter frequency, finger movement, and letter combinations. Note the presence of all the vowels on the home row, and common consonants like "snthd" on the home row of the right hand. This makes it highly likely that after the typist uses a vowel he will be switching to the opposite hand (likely the home row) to type the next letter.

      What I'm getting at is that Dvorak's advantage may be more in hand/wrist comfort than anything else. I'll admit that claims of increased speed using Dvorak are probably not persuasive enough to make the argument for superiority. The article's strongest point is showing that typing speed varies little as a function of the layout of the keys. I'm willing to buy that anyone can type about as fast on any layout using the modern "shift" style keyboard. But speed isn't the only consideration. I haven't read or heard about many studies making the claim for reduced RSI while using Dvorak, but I'd guess that it's true. Anyone who's used the layout can confirm that typing on it has a flow and continuity that QWERTY cannot match - every time I'm forced to use a QWERTY keyboard I'm struck by how much my fingers are stretching all around to find the letters (and yes, I can still touch-typed in QWERTY after a minute or two of warm-up and finger-conversion - it's kind of like being keyboard bilingual). With Dvorak typing is just more natural feeling, like a ball rolling down a smooth hill. QWERTY is like rolling that same ball down a flight of steps. And if you gain a little extra typing speed out of it, all the better! (For what it's worth, the world typing speed record has been held by Dvorak typists for many years now.)

      This is not some evangelical manifesto urging everyone to change layouts - but if you do make the switch, I promise you won't be disappointed. Both Windows and Mac have built-in Dvorak capability, and switching between the two is just a simple key combination. I've found that Mac is a bit more cooperative in this regard, but Windows is passably good. It's easy to fall into the trap of "well, if most of the world uses it, it must be the best thing out there." Doesn't hold true for Windows, does it?

      --

      Was that out loud?
    11. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should look for a job at Microsoft. They need good FUD spreaders such as yourself.

    12. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you are wondering "what the f--- is arensito"?

      http://www.pvv.ntnu.no/~hakonhal/keyboard/

    13. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well whoever modded that up and tagged it "informative" will probably be very ashamed after he reads some actual _facts_ instead of stupid fud:

      http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/dissent.html

      There you go! Now get this post up to 5 fast so that everyone finds out the truth please.

      Geez, this reminds me of why I stopped posting in the /. forums 2 years ago.

      Hans

    14. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      IMHO, if you're a programmer, the argument of QWERTY vs. Dvorak is moot. Programming (or using any non-word processing app) requires a huge amount of usage of arrow keys, ctl and alt sequences, and funny symbols, not to mention mouse movement.

      My hands tend to bother me more from these actions than from typing words. In fact, I can type straight text all day and not feel much strain.

      My latest theory is that you can strain your hands even without typing. Long stretches of just holding my hands in a tense position over the keyboard ready to edit code seems to bother me.

    15. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Trevin · · Score: 1

      I switched to Dvorak several years ago. I recently took some more typing tests using Mavis Beacon's program, and was nearly stunned to find that my speed had reached 90 wpm! Compare this to my best Qwerty speed before I switched, which was around 75 wpm. It took me just a couple of months for my Dvorak speed to match my Qwerty speed, but I never thought I'd be able to beat it.

      So yesterday when I pulled apart my keyboard to clean it (a very good Chicony -- tactile, audible click, sturdy construction, spare keys just where I want them), I rearranged the key tops into the Dvorak layout.

    16. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by alyosha1 · · Score: 1

      My experience with Dvorak has been very positive, apart from the initial learning curve. I guess my productivity went down for a week or so while I was picking it up, but I haven't looked back since. I can touch type reasonably well now, something I could never get the hang of on Qwerty, and since switching my wrists have felt better too. It also provides endless amusement when other people sit down at my machine and try typing something...

    17. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amen to that! I did find some relief in making sure the keyboard was at least completely horizontal, if not actually tilting opposite to usual practice by having the near (space bar) edge higher than the far (function keys) edge, and, in fact, a "workstation ergonomics consultant" at a big company I used to work for pointed out that the best keyboards have elevation adjustments for exactly that purpose. Just think about how your hands normally are positioned when holding your forearms out perpendicular from your body -- the hands tend to dip down, and keybooard positioning that bends them up from that orientation is definitely stressful.

      I also think that a diamond-shaped cursor keypad would be far more natural than the usual inverted T found on most keyboards. I seem to recall seeing that on some keyboards back in the late 80's, but can't remember who made them. The advantage would be that one could tell by the feel of the key "points" which corresponding arrow one is touching -- I'm forever hitting the wrong cursor key because they all feel the same.

      And my transition from IBM mainframes to unix was greatly hampered by the frequent use of the underscore character instead of the dash to make compound names for files and variables simply because the former is usually a "far" key that has to be shifted rather than an unshifted far key as the dash is. I still try to get away with using dashes whenever I can in that usage, but it seems to bother others as well as occasionally messing up shell parsing if I'm not using quoting very carefully ;-}

      ROC

    18. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best thing I found about switching to dvorak a few months back was just how 'right' the layout feels. I typed qwerty for about five years before switching, and although being quite a fast typist, most words felt awful to type. In the end it took me about 3 weeks to fully change, and I'm possibly not quite as fast as I was (several months later, but I presume it'll come with time), but I'd definitely recommend it to people - give it a go, especially if you suffer from RSI even slightly.

      And as another person said, it does provide great amusement, and people can't watch you type your password and guess it :-) Also, setting up aliases under linux for "aoeu" and "asdf" to change layouts really helps if you and your partner type different layouts too (!)

    19. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That even sounds fast. Try using some commas.

    20. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are *wrong*. WAY wrong. PLEASE, and I mean it, please look at a dvorak layout. Please pick out some words on it, and compare to qwerty, and find out for yourself which layout uses alternating hands, and which layout uses the hands and fingers evenly. Don't spread old FUD from a silly economics article that some idiot students wrote a few years ago. Please realize that those researchers didn't even go to the simple step of evaluating the actual properties of the Dvorak layout.

    21. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Dvorak makes some of the same mistakes as QWERTY,
      overusing the pinkies and underusing the thumbs,
      among other things. In particular:

      Certain buckies (shift especially, and to a lesser extent
      control) are used more frequently than the lesser-used
      letters, but they are stuck out of the way where pinkies
      have to be hyperextended to reach them. This is *bad*.
      These keys need to be easy to reach, _especially_ since
      they are often held through several consecutive keystrokes.

      Only one thumb is used profitably. It would be really
      nice to split that spacebar in half and use the other
      half of it for something... For something you often
      want to hit at the same time as other keys, such as
      shift, this would be a huge improvement. In fact, if
      the keyboard is split in two (as it should be, really),
      there's no particular reason the left thumb can't have
      a choice of two keys to hit, which could be shift and
      perhaps ctrl.

      Some of the seldom-used punctuation (square brackets
      and curly braces, for example, which seem to pop up
      mainly in Perl) are easier to reach than more often
      used punctuation (such as backslash/pipe, which are
      used constantly on some systems).

      The Windows key on 104-key keyboards is too easy to
      hit accidentally, when reaching for another key. But
      hitting it disrupts whatever you are doing. It should
      be up in the extreme top row, with things like PrtSc
      and Pause. (Besides Windows, this also effects Gnome,
      at least with some distributions.)

      The extra keys between the main keyboard area and
      the keypad are in the way and should be removed, or
      at least moved to the outer edge beyond the keypad.
      They duplicate funtionality already extant in the
      keypad since 1980 if not before, in a more difficult
      to use layout. (On the keypad, you can easily reach
      all the cursor movement keys without moving your hand.
      In the area to the left this is not the case.) Their
      only purpose is to increase the distance the hand must
      travel to get from the home position on the main area
      (for data entry) to the home position on the keypad
      (for navigation).

      I'm using a modified keyboard layout, described in
      another post, and it's some improvment, but I had to
      work with the same _physical_ layout as everyone else,
      and could have done much better given the opportunity
      to physically redesign the keyboard and, for example,
      make better use of the second thumb.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    22. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by huckda · · Score: 1

      It takes one or two days before you know aproximately whene all the letters are, and then

      I'm having a hard time believing you've been using it for 4 years when you typo the word 'where'... =)

      --Huck

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    23. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Captain_Jackass · · Score: 1

      There are no moving parts in todays keybeards.

      There are, however, moving parts in today's keyboards. (Or at least the keys seem to move up and down as I press them.)

    24. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by agusus · · Score: 1

      In my experience, people argue about this because they want to be using the better keyboard, and most Qwerty users don't want to switch to dvorak.
      As a dvorak typer for the past year, I've found ergonomics and accuracy to be the biggest advantages of dvorak. Since the most commonly used keys are all on the home row, you move your fingers a lot shorter distances than with Qwerty. That helped with the tendonitis I was getting in my arms from typing so much. I've never had any significant pain from typing since I switched to dvorak.

      Also, I've heard claims that dvorak typists make less typing errors (hitting the wrong key). I think this might be true because I seem to make far fewer typing errors now using dvorak.

      One reason that Qwerty typists cite as preventing them from switching to dvorak (besides the learning curve) is that they're afraid they won't be able to type on other computers because they don't know how to switch the keyboard layout.
      But it can be done on almost every platform - Linux/Unix, Windows, Mac OS.

    25. Re:Curious about Dvorak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dvorak has _so_ much more sensible bindings for
      {}[] etc, it's much nicer as a programmers keyboard. Atleast for us non-US people.

  14. Will stick to my old sturdy IBM keyboard by Kasmiur · · Score: 1

    Not only does the nice click give a good feeling and the ticking of the keys as I type along. But also its strudy and heavy I could use it as a weapon to beat someone with if they were to complain about how loud the keys were at night.

    --
    -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
  15. i don't think keyboards are your problem by lingqi · · Score: 1

    you might want to ask your facilities personells to invest in better cubicals. i am not joking -- cubes (good ones (ha!)) are supposed to block sounds of typing, and not-too-noisy conversations etc. full-height helps; metal-backed helps; etc.

    you can also use this excuse and ask for an office.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:i don't think keyboards are your problem by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

      Very very unlikely to happen.

      I'm in the uk and office culture here is open plan offices. There's about 2500 people in this building alone, and this building is but one of about 30 around the country and they're all the same. Nobody,, not even the board of directors has private offices, nobody has cubicles. All we have is an 18inch tall panels on the back and side of my desk seperating me from the others. The clusters of desks are a bout 3 feet appart. It's like that in just about every large UK office. I've never worked in a cubicle or my own 1 person-to-a-room office in the 20 odd years I've been programming

      --
      And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  16. For those who don't read articles... by Thomas+M+Hughes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, its slashdotted, so you're excused.

    But BS = Buckling Spring.

    1. Re:For those who don't read articles... by 68k+geek · · Score: 1

      i always thought BS = bull shit

  17. keyblocking by kEnder242 · · Score: 1

    anyone know a good keyboard that DOES NOT KEYBLOCK? Does usb suffer this?

    Every logitech (and many generic) keyboards i've tried only allows 2 keys to be pressed on the keypad. Since I use the keypad for my gaming config I've been stuck with the same one for 7 nearly years. Google isnt very helpfull so thats why i'm asking on slashdot.

    btw, Starcon2 rules!

    --
    my associative arrays can kick your hash - TCL
    1. Re:keyblocking by Make · · Score: 1

      I've always used Cherry G81 or G80 keyboards, and I've noticed a limit of something between 5 and 10 keys pressed at a time, with a PS/2 keyboard. I havn't tested my Cherry G80 USB keyboard yet, but even with "only" 5 or 10 keys, this is not a problem.

      Logitech keyboards really suck in my opinion. Keyboard and monitor are your primary interfaces to your computer, you should take care when selecting them. You don't need 2.5 GHz and 2 gigs RAM. You need a good keyboard and a good monitor.

    2. Re:keyblocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " I've always used Cherry G81 or G80 keyboards,"

      Be careful not to bust your cherry :-)

    3. Re:keyblocking by Trevin · · Score: 1

      I've never given this much though before, so I just tried it out. My Chicony (KB-5981) will let me press up to 8 keys simultaneously. After that, the ninth key press doesn't register. Very impressive!

      I originally got the Chicony because it was the only one I could find with an audible key click, good tactile feel, *and* it put the '\' key next to the backspace key where I wanted it. I'm seeing now that it is definitely one of the best keyboards around. (Or was -- don't know whether I could still find one these days.)

    4. Re:keyblocking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a Mac. Every modern Mac I own (~last 7 years) with an Apple keyboard allows between 5 and 10 keys at once.

      USB keyboards do seem to be limited to about 6 or 7, though. ADB keyboards seem to have no problem with 8 to 10 at a time.

  18. Anyone remember these? by 00_NOP · · Score: 2

    The zx80 keyboard? Well, it had no keys at all, really - just patches of plastic you had to run your finger over to get the characters to appear on the screen.

    Thene there was the zxspectrum keyboard - memorably described as having the texture of the flesh of a dead fish.

    My keyboard is full of button (HP internet extensions) which Linux seems unable to use properly - I have tried avrious solutions, but none works well. There is a specific driver for this keyboard too, but it doesn't seem to drive the extra keys AFAICS.

    1. Re:Anyone remember these? by NaDrew · · Score: 1

      I had one of those! Sinclair ZX80 Wow, that brings back memories. The thing had 4KB of RAM (not 4MB, 4KB!). My dad was trying to write a backgammon game; got as far as a cool animated dice-rolling routine before he ran out of memory.
      Wish I knew where it was, I think it was lost in a move several years ago or something.

      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    2. Re:Anyone remember these? by pubjames · · Score: 2

      The zx80 keyboard?

      My introduction to programming was reading the manual of my nextdoor neighbour's ZX80 when I was about 10 years old. I think that qualifies me as a true nerd.

    3. Re:Anyone remember these? by skurk · · Score: 1

      00_NOP wrote:
      > The zx80 keyboard?

      I second that, the ZX80 keyboard was terrible. Actually we used those computers at school in a class called "Computers and Programming" in 1982 or something. Yup, BASIC programming on 1K RAM and a crappy black and white TV for display. Imagine the sensibility on those fragile pads after being punched and poked by hundreds of bullies, no wonder my fingertips still hurt.

      IMHO, I always found the Amiga 500 keyboard to be the best. It also had the CTRL key at the right spot, which is why I'm using - and recommending - the Happy Hacker Keyboard. It's a few extra bucks, but I promise you all - it's worth it.

      -skurk.

      --
      www.6502asm.com - Code 6502 assembly or.. DIE!!
    4. Re:Anyone remember these? by Tune · · Score: 2

      > (HP internet extensions) which Linux seems unable to use properly

      Hmm. Does Linux properly support all keys found on a ZX81/Spectrum? Even that (couch) wonderful "command completion" thing in BASIC? ' Guess not. No Linux at all for these micros...

      I remember that to overcome cumbersome experiences with the ATM-like soft-touch/dead fish feeling, my dad built his own keyboard - from scratch, mostly. He used an old electric typewriter he found on a dump an bought for "just" $50 (real keyboards costed twice that in the early eigties). Using that piece of junk, a lot of wires and solder he finally got something that looked like a contemporary computer. Looked a bit like a C64. (My dad had gained some experience from previously building a keyboard for Acorn's System-1 computer, that came as a do-it-yourself-kit with just a few leds and the same 12 keys you'll find on any mobile phone today!)

      Ah. Real pieces of art - but I was so happy when we got a BBC micro in '83.

    5. Re:Anyone remember these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing had 4KB of RAM (not 4MB, 4KB!).

      Huh? It had a 4k ROM, it had 1k of RAM (unless you got the 16k expansion pack)

      The best two things I wrote were a football (soccer) game and The Game of Life, both written in hand-crafted z80 machine code - assemblers are for wimps - and both able to run in 1k. My life has been all downhill since then.

    6. Re:Anyone remember these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naah- the Amiga 2000 keyboard was better than the 500's - the 500 had individually sprung rubber keys contacts in a good layout, but the 2000 had actual metal buckling spring contacts.

    7. Re:Anyone remember these? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I seem to remember they were about the same vintage as the Commodore PET, or maybe a bit before. I wrote an unbeatable tic-tac-toe prog for one of those... I think the keyboard sucked on that one, too :-)

  19. Today's Keyboards... by stuffman64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Up until recently, I have been using trusty 'ol IBM PS/2 keyboard. Its trusty mechanical feedback was great, not to mention nearly error-free when working properly. Also, when my high school chucked out its old computers, I was able to salvage about 15 to 20 of these beauties. Nearly all worked perfectly, and those that didn't were not to hard to fix with a solder iron and spare parts.

    But recently, my wrists have begun to bother me (probably CTS setting in; and I'm nary 20 years old) and the old keyboards refused to work on my new rig (I probably could have modified one of them to work, but college really cuts out the free time). So I went to Wally Mart Computer Center and picked up this Logitech Navigator keyboard. This is by far one of the best keyboards I have used. Sure, those Mikeysoft Naturals are comfy, but they take up too much space and it is quite difficult to play Unreal Tournament with. The tactile sensation, while softer and not nearly as loud as the PS/2's, has a reassuring, yet subtle "crunch" to it. Not to mention, it has a scroll wheel built in (I use mine to switch apps, it is quite handy), and numerous other handy buttons. All the Ctrl functions are silkscreened on the front side of the keys for handy reference. And it was only $30.

    The most unique feature, however, is the zero-tilt design. All of the keys are perfectly flat; normal keyboards "curve up" as you approach the number row, but all the keys on this keyboard are on the same plane, parallel to the desk. I have to say that it takes some getting used to, but in the end it is far more comfortable than a regular "tilted" keyboard. Now if only I can figure out how to get some of these extra buttons and stuff working in Linux.... damn semi-n00b skillz.

    While I miss my PS/2's (they are still attached to my other boxes), I would have to say that I am quite impressed with the Navigator. Hopefully this thing will be as durable as the old PS/2's.

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    1. Re:Today's Keyboards... by JPriest · · Score: 1

      this "Microsoft Internet Keyboard ($19)" is my favorite keyboard, I don't use the internet buttons but it's my favorate in terms of size and the way it keys. I have 2 at home and one I keep at work. It's PS2, doesen't have the bling-bling gee wiz features of some of the other (USB) keyboards, and it's not crap.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:Today's Keyboards... by Ezubaric · · Score: 2

      > nearly error-free when working properly.

      That's the way most things are, in my experience. Errors always seem to happen when things stop working properly. Darndest thing!

      --

      ----------
      I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
    3. Re:Today's Keyboards... by belbo · · Score: 3, Informative
      Now if only I can figure out how to get some of these extra buttons and stuff working in Linux

      May I humbly suggest an article of mine on that topic?

      Regards

      b.

      --

      --
      "Just believe everything I tell you, and it will all be very, very simple."

    4. Re:Today's Keyboards... by vampire · · Score: 1

      Sure, those Mikeysoft Naturals are comfy, but they take up too much space and it is quite difficult to play Unreal Tournament with.

      I don't know what you're smoking, but playing Unreal Tournament on them is quite simple. Same as any other qwerty keyboard. =|-)

      And for those of us with carpal tunnel syndrome running rampant in our families, they are a blessing. Once I switched, I've had no RSI-related problems at all! So not being able to stick the MS Natural in a keyboard drawer doesn't really matter... just raise/lower the desk and/or chair to the appropriate ergonomically correct height and all is well.

  20. Dead at quarter to 5... by stuffman64 · · Score: 2

    Well, still quarter to five, and we killed em...

    Google Cache

    --
    --- At my sig, unleash hell.
  21. The Macintosh Barge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Macintosh users also had a great old keyboard upon which to remember fondly: The Barge.

    It was big but when you used it you knew that you were using a REAL keyboard.

    Touch typists knew the difference.

  22. IBM Active Response vs. $9 CompUSA branded by MonMotha · · Score: 1

    Of the membrane keyboards I have (I loved the old IBM mechanical things, but they're too loud!), I do prefer my $50 IBM Active Response one better, and it's what I use on my main desktop. But in the other room, I keep a couple of $9 CompUSA branded things. They feel *almost* as good as my IBM, and they're a helluva lot cheaper. Try them out, CompUSA (if you have them in your area), often has a whole pallet of them (I kid you not) stacked at least 3-4 feet high stuck next to the pole at the end of the keyboard isle. They're great for keeping around as spares or got bundling with white box systems.

    For me though? I won't be getting rid of my IBM ActiveTouch any time soon. It lacks drain holes, not that it would do well even if it did being a membrane keyboard, but it's firm tactile feedback while still being a quiet membrane keyboard is unmatched by anything else I've used. As a plus, it also has the skinny enter bar with the big slash and pipe key, which I'm sooooo used to now that I can't use keyboards with the other design (my Sun type 4 always throws me off...)

    --MonMotha

    1. Re:IBM Active Response vs. $9 CompUSA branded by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 2

      $50 Active Response Keyboards? The CompUSA by me sells them roughly aroung $30. I have one sitting around which I used to use until I picked up this Apple Pro USB keyboard.

    2. Re:IBM Active Response vs. $9 CompUSA branded by MonMotha · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure mine cost $49.99, but I could be wrong. Either way, it's significantly more than the $9 CompUSA brand.

  23. IBM? Hah! It's Apple that rules! by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    ...with their (equally ancient) Extended Keyboard II. It's just as solid as the IBM stuff (its development codename was 'Nimitz'...), but less noisy. Cost a fortune, though.

  24. Programmers - buy a Japanese layout keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an IBM 94X1110 Japanese keyboard, and it is absolutely EXCELLENT.

    For programmers the layout is excellent - ; and : are on separate keys, and you can map the keys to select between Katakana, Hiragana, Kanji and Romaji to be the shift keys that dissapeared years ago with the Space Cadet keyboard! So, you can have control, meta, hyper and super in E-MACS!

    Also, although I prefer to type Japanese in Romaji, and select the Kanji from a list, some people do prefer to use the direct Kana input keys, (nobody I know of does that, though).

  25. Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Still my fave, and they stopped making them years ago. Apple's keyboards have gone downhill ever since. I have two Apple Extended Keyboards and I will keep using them until the keys don't work anymore. They're huge, heavy (but not too heavy), and the keys have the perfect balance between "soft" and "clunk" when you pound on them. I even spilled tequila on one of them and didn't fry it (don't try this at home though; I'm sure I got lucky.... heh, friends don't let friends code drunk). My heart sunk when I bought a 7100/66 back in the day and, expecting another extended keyboard, I opened the box to find a smaller, mushier keyboard (I forget its name, but I threw it away it sucked so bad).

    Anyway here's a pic if you like to drool over pics of keyboards (the page itself is not so informative unless you speak Japanese). You can probably still buy these things used on ebay... if you use a Mac and have an ADB input (I don't think they have them on the newest ones but I'm not sure) that you don't mind using your keyboard in, pick one up!! This keyboard rules over all others.... I'm so obsessed with this keyboard that I'm considering getting a USB to ADB adapter so I can plug it into my tibook.

    Keyboards do matter.

    1. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      did you ever notice that there were TWO different versions of said keyboard? the only OBVIOUS difference is that the Aple logo moved, but the older "type" is the best KB I've ever used. I've still got one, but I can't plug it into my PowerMac G4 :-[. And, yes, both the C64 and Amiga A500 keyboards were a cut above the shit you get with PCs today. My Apple Pro KB is pretty good, but still gives a lot away to the old Extended!

      The shitty KB you got with your 7100 was called the Apple "Design" KB and was - as you rightly point out - bloody awful. Didi you ever try the original Mac 128K KB? Nice action there...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me, I use a blue & white G3 running linuxppc2000, with one of those Apple Extended Keyboards (and a half decent mouse) on the ADB.

      I still have the flimsy keyboard and "hockey puck" that came with it hidden under my desk and hooked up to USB, in case of emergency I guess. I haven't touched them in months so they've got a fair bit of dust on em now.

    3. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah man don't even get me started on those cramped crappy blue USB keyboards.... yecch!!!

    4. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      they do have ONE redeeming feature - they're small. If you use a large graphics tablet they make an ideal companion - I've got one of the graphite coloured ones thusly set up on my gfx machine with a n A3 Wacom - works out nicely.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    5. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      actually, they have another redeeming feature (I'm actually using one now) the page down key is the top-right most key on the board, which makes it rather nice to use when reading long pages on the www. Like Slashdot pages for instance. Like a lot of the compact designs that Apple have done (eg hockey puck) women seem to like they as well - my girlfriend loves her compact kb and hockey puck mouse, they just fit her hands better.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    6. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by sh4de · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the AEK 2 is sorely missed. I used to have one at home and one at work. I've since upgraded to G4 based systems with the translucent plastic keyboards. Ulch.

      The Apple Extended Keyboard II had an internal codename of Nimitz, which is particularly fitting once you look at how one is made. There's enough steel inside to make it last. The key travel is optimal, tactile feedback just right, and it weighs enough to stay put during the sessions I call "rabid prototyping."

      The whole damn thing looks like it was designed by a typist, not the marketing department.

    7. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Absolutely. It cost a fortune in the UK - £112 in 1992 I think (~$155 at today's exchange rates), and it was worth every penny.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    8. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by Megane · · Score: 2
      Anyway here's a pic [tripod.co.jp] if you like to drool over pics of keyboards

      The picture of the Apple Adjustable Keyboard is interesting because it puts the 6 key on the correct side! Microsoft's crappy ergonomic keyboard puts the 6 key on the left side, while touch-typists (me at least) use their right hand for the 6 key.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by stux · · Score: 2

      The big difference being that the Apple Extended Keyboard II has an adjustable height... yes position between minimum and maximum, not todays cruddy up or down :)

      I have about 10 of these lovely keyboards... pitty no OSX machine of a respectable speed has ADB ports :(

      --

      ---
      Live Long & Prosper \\//_
      CYA STUX =`B^) 'da Captain,
      Jedi & Last *-fytr
    10. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every keyboard I've had has the 6 closer to the left hand than the right hand so I've always used the left for it. It's because F is farther under 5 than J is under 7 by about half a key width.

    11. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      Damn right. Can we petition Apple to bring these back in USB? I've got a USB Pro keyboard, and after awhile I was able to get used to it, but after two years I still don't like it. The Apple Extended Keyboard was absolutely perfect. The right feel, and all the keys in the right place - what is it with keyboard manufacturers that refuse to put the backslash where it belongs?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    12. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by araque · · Score: 1

      I will sign the petition!

      Hopefully they'll integrate Bluetooth technology, bring it up to the 21st century. They were worth every penny, they were solid, quiet, just the right touch. I sorely miss them.

      I also read good things ("comparable to the AEK") about the Microspeed keyboards, but never used one. Can anyone iluminate me?

      http://www.microspeed.com/products/kb086.html

    13. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you are young. Every use a typewriter?

    14. Re:Apple Extended Keyboard II !!!!! by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Well you could get a USB to ADB converter and use an old Apple Extended Keyboard on your Mac or if you feel like it on a PC. I think the problem with bringing back a keyboard like that is that the Apple Extended Keyboard is contructed totally different from current keyboards. It uses keyswitches soldered on a PCB instead of a membrane design like the keyboards in the article. The keyswitches were made by Alps and I'm not sure if the keyswitches are even manufactued anymore. Northgate Computer Systems manufactured the OmniKey models of keyboards with Alps keyswitches which are AT keyboards so they would work on a PC. However some of them had nonstandard key layouts and on all of them you have to watch out for how the DIP switches in back are set because incorrect settings can cause the keyboard to act unexpectedly. Another problem is that the Northgate keyboards do not have rubber bumpers and are kind of noisy. Alps also made at least one line of keyboards using their own keyswitches about seven years ago for both Macs and PCs. Nearly of them had a trackpad built into them and on all of them the space bar is split into two keys. The right key acts like a normal space key, but the left key acts like a delete key by default, but it is software remappable. However, Alps no longer has the drivers for Windows or MacOS 8 available for download so the keyboard is somewhat hard to use.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  26. generic keyboards are getting harder to find by chongo · · Score: 1
    While the typical PC store today may have multiple to choose from, the keyboards that they do carry have those Stupid MS Windows logo key and a collection of idiot keys! You have all seen those keyboard with idiot keys such as an "Internet" key, an "EMail" key, a "Finance" key, etc...

    It is harder to find a generic (say VT100-like) keyboard these days. Can anyone recommend a source for a PS2 (or USB) generic, non-MS tainted, non-idiot key infested quality keyboards?

    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
    1. Re:generic keyboards are getting harder to find by Warmth+Is+Life · · Score: 1

      In my recent search, I found that these keyboards are perfect, albeit overpriced.

    2. Re:generic keyboards are getting harder to find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These keyboards are not idiotic. at least not if the manufacturer is named Microsoft.

      The idea is to sneakily extend software into hardware.
      Think of a button named "Favorites". This extends the IE from screen to keyboard.
      It is a major psychological trick.

    3. Re:generic keyboards are getting harder to find by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the point wasn't these keyboards are made by idiots but for idiots.

    4. Re:generic keyboards are getting harder to find by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I use a MS Natural keyboard now (although I've been a diehard Linux user since about '96 or so). The only thing wrong with it was the MS logo at the top right hand corner. But it comes off quite nicely with careful application of acetone with tissue paper :-)

    5. Re:generic keyboards are getting harder to find by Hydro-X · · Score: 1

      Amen brother. I had searched long and hard for a decent keyboard with no "idiot buttons". My search came to an end when my mother bought herself a new P3 800 system a few years ago. It came bundled with a generic Mitsumi PS/2 keyboard. The model I have now is KFK-EA4XT. They have a small footprint and even a pen rack on the top for storing your writables. The touch and feel of them are great too. I checked around for one for my own machine and to my surprise I found that most local stores stock em. And all for the low low price of 19$ CAD.

  27. Best Keyboard Ever? by Dynamoo · · Score: 1
    I belong to the Jerry Pournelle school of thought on keyboards - i.e. that most of them these days are rubbish.

    The best keyboard I ever used was on a TeleVideo 9220 terminal, a really nice piece of work..

    • First of all it was nice and HEAVY so it didn't move around much, but the keys were quite light and easy to use.
    • It had a nice big reverse-L shaped Return key rather than the excuse for a key we see on PC keyboards.
    • The Caps Lock actually LOCKED down.
    • The Escape key was next to the "1" - just where God intended it to be.
    • There was both a TAB and a "00" key on the numeric keypad. Great for data entry.

    Ahhh bliss.. sadly the keyboard only worked on a TV9220 and frankly there's more to computing these days than VT220 compatible terminals :)

    --
    Never email donotemail@WeAreSpammers.com
    1. Re:Best Keyboard Ever? by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      # The Caps Lock actually LOCKED down.

      I haven't seen such a thing since my grandmother's typewriter.

      That would be awesome!

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    2. Re:Best Keyboard Ever? by ViXX0r · · Score: 1

      IIRC, Commodore computers (i.e. VIC20, C64...) had this.

      --
      University - a box of academia nuts.
    3. Re:Best Keyboard Ever? by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      I used to have a TeleVideo 925 terminal - for my FLEX system. (Anyone here remember FLEX?).
      Great keyboards...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    4. Re:Best Keyboard Ever? by stux · · Score: 2

      The Apple Extended II keyboard features a locking caps-lock :)

      The really cool thing was to set your run key to be the capslock key... then you could push it.... and you'd stay in turbo until you pushed it again :)

      Great.

      Who needs a friggin light in the key, or in the far corner when the key just locks down.

      --

      ---
      Live Long & Prosper \\//_
      CYA STUX =`B^) 'da Captain,
      Jedi & Last *-fytr
  28. Card punches by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 1
    Well, I first started programming, I used a card punch where you had 12 buttons, one for each row of holes, and you had to do the chords for each character. Anyone else remember these things?

    Kids of today, don't know they're born, bwah, bwah, etc..

  29. oops by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

    This was meant to be a reply to the main thread; not the c-64 thread. I guess friends shouldn't let friends browse slashdot drunk either.

  30. I'll see your buckling spring, and raise you ..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, how about a keyboard that I only recently stopped using? Each key is an ALPS switch, no buckling springs or membranes here folks, each key has a switch under it.

    I doubt it will ever break :)

  31. My two favorites: by x136 · · Score: 2

    The article is slashdotted already, but since we're on the subject of keyboards...

    IBM Model M: Best. Keyboard. Ever. I found two of 'em in a box full of crappy Dell QuietKeys a while back, and was instantly hooked.

    Apple Extended Keyboard II: Not nearly as "clack clack" as the Model M, but a very nice feel to a very solid keyboard. Whenever I get around to buying a new(er) Mac, I think the USB keyboard will just stay in the box, while the Extended II gets hooked up with an adapter.

    The Microsoft Naturals are supposed to be nice, but I can't stand the look or the feel of split keyboards.

    Anyway, that's my list, as if you care. :)

    --
    SIGFEH
    1. Re:My two favorites: by TheKey · · Score: 1

      See, I really like how the Microsoft Naturals look, and feel (when just resting my hands), but when I start typing .. I just can't do it. See, there are just a few keys that are the right hand's that I hit with my left (y), and when the two sides are seperated, I just end of hitting blank space when reaching for the 'y'.

      Ar. Oh well.

      --
      My Journal - 1,337 fans and countin
  32. Buckling Spring, Capacitive Keyswitches Keyboards by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    Most old timers remember the super loud "clicky" IBM keyboards that were super durable. Their only two disadvantages were the loud noise and their price, but if you want good tactile feedback, you pay the price of added noise. Furthermore, if you want a strong keyboard that will last, it will have to be built out of high quality components and materials. Doing a little research finds that the original technology used in the old IBM keyboards is still around. The technology is called "Buckling Spring Capacitive Keyswitches", and a company called Unicomp long ago bought the technology from IBM. In fact, they still sell those lovable clicky and nearly indestructable keyboards.

    There are a few things you need to realize about this technology. It is truely superior to the foam and rubber dome keyswitches used in most mainstream keyboards. The BS capacitive keyswitches last for millions and millions more keystrokes than the other technologies, so buying one of these keyboards is an investment. Not only that, but BS keyswitch technology is more water resistant than the cheaper keyswitch technologies. You can spill your drink into an old IBM keyboard... and as long as you unplug it and let it dry out, it will still work. Other things play into this older IBM keyboard tech. For example, keys sticking or not registering is highly unlikely with the IBM technology, but it happens all the time with the foam keyswitches used in the popular Microsoft keyboards. Finally, touch typing is so much easier with buckling spring capacitive keyswitches as you can feel the click AND hear it.

    I highly suggest any self respecting computer user to get one of these keyboards for their house. Just remember the only two drawbacks: noise and price. In every other way these keyboards excel! I suggest the old skool IBM keyboard that Unicomp sells through their Yahoo store.

  33. If you don't like all them extra keys..... by phagstrom · · Score: 1

    you can always get a happy hacking keyboard here.

    No more of those sissy windows or CAPS LOCK keys ;-)

    1. Re:If you don't like all them extra keys..... by mali · · Score: 1

      Why not replace the windows keys with linux keys:

      http://io.ram.rwth-aachen.de/g80-tux.jpg

      (yes, its not QWERTY ;-))

      --


      ---
    2. Re:If you don't like all them extra keys..... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      i believe it is QWERTY, just German-QWERTZ. As i recall from my trip there, the keyboard is like 99% the same, just with some umlaut keys and the "z" and "y" are switched..

      or i could be wrong...

    3. Re:If you don't like all them extra keys..... by mali · · Score: 1

      You're not ;-)

      --


      ---
    4. Re:If you don't like all them extra keys..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ugh.
      why are they trying fit everything on a damn postcard? if it isn't at least half a meter wide i wont call it a keyboard. it's a pad or some other sorry excuse.

  34. SLEEP - avant le lettre by Tune · · Score: 2

    > The [Sinclair ZX80] had 4KB of RAM (not 4MB, 4KB!).

    Hmm. 4KB is probably less than the on-chip buffers found in current PS/2 keyboards.

    Wow... back in the days, when a single .5 Mhz Z80 featured both as ZX81 CPU and video processor. The keyboard featured a set of keys for BASIC commands FAST and SLOW to switch off video output and boost the micro's performance.

    The closest current analogy to this is probably the "sleep" key found on laptops!

  35. Loved the noise by danamania · · Score: 2

    I fell in love with the tactile clickety-click keyboards while at Uni in the early 1990s - and put up with quite a few people telling me to shut the hell up when I -really- got going on them. Pity. Not that anyone was particularly quiet on the things

    Now having a mac with only a USB Pro Keyboard to keep me happy (and with its big fat keys it has its own kind of appeal) I don't have access to anything clickety - anyone know of USB keyboards with 'kick'?

    a grrl & her server

    1. Re:Loved the noise by Megane · · Score: 2

      Have you counsidered a USB to PS/2 keyboard adapter?

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:Loved the noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with a Model M in an Mac is the lack of Windows keys... the Mac uses the "Apple" key to a chronic extent, so it's unusable with a standard 101 keyboard.

      The only solution I've found is to buy one of the new pckeyboard.com keyboards with Windows keys and use a PS2 to USB converter. It's just too much hassle, especially as I've discovered that I actually like the Apple Pro keyboard.

      So I have left the Model M's on my old PC and still use it from time to time, but I don't really miss it that much. The key thunking into the keyboard at the bottom of its travel is all the feedback I need.

  36. Teletype! by pesc · · Score: 4, Informative
    Hah!

    Listen kids, back in MY days, we used teletypes. Those keyboards were not for the weak. You had to hammer down the keys. And when one key was down, the other were mechanically locked and could not be pressed. You would hurt your fingers if you tried to hammer two keys at once.

    The wonder of the teletype! No electronics. It was all mechanics. Imagine that! And they also had a paper tape reader/puncher which was handy to save your programs if your 100K disk allowance was used up.

    --

    )9TSS
    1. Re:Teletype! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disk!?!?!? You had disk??? In MY day we were punching that stuff into cards, my man, with no sissy buffer between you and the card, on an IBM 029 keypunch. Of course once the 129 came out there was much rejoicing by those less skilled that could benefit from a buffer and release key. Once those newfangled PC things came around I noted that the M keyboard was remarkably similar to the keyboards I used on my 3179 - so I'm still using them. Of course I'm partial to the units with the double F-key rows for a total of 24. A cow-orker and me stumbled into our company's elephant graveyard of castoff computers some years ago and spotted a cache of these keyboards and quickly scarfed them up. Still going strong. Anybody else ever play "stickball" with their keyboard - pitcher tosses tennis balls or racquetballs and batter hits with the backside of an M keyboard? Try that with your MS keyboard!

    2. Re:Teletype! by RKloti · · Score: 1

      CARD? You had CARDS? Why, back in my day, the only data input we had were beads on sticks. Operating at about 2 Hz, there was never any need for those ridiculous "fans" (or whatever you call them) and those little substations you connect to your "personal" computers. No siree, we operated 'em by hand. No need for monitas either, we just held 'em against the sun, or the bonfire at night. And there weren't no ECC either, so if you made a mistake, ya did it all ov'a again. No WINDOWS or LINUX then, no, we used FingerOS. A multi-purpOSe if I ever sawed one. No virusii or bugs either, 'cept the ones that stung your fingers during those long nights at the paleolithic camp trying to work out the sum of two and three. Ah, the TurboABACUS (and it's big brother, the LithoABACUS), brings back fond memories, eh? Yep, them were the days...

  37. Modern Keyboards are Rubbish by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    Oh yes, the old IBM keyboards. I loved those, wish I had one - no, two, one for home and one for work.
    The first computer I had, a Tangerine Microtan 65, had the option of a really good keyboard, and aside from the aforementioned IBM keyboards was one of the best computer keyboards I have ever used.
    Modern membrane keyboards range from the barely acceptable to the completely useless. I cannot stand typing on a keyboard that feels like limp wet lettuce, which is what some of the cheaper membranes often supplied with PCs feel like. Ugh! After a keyboard failed at work lately, I had to go through five spare keyboards to find one that I could use.
    When I type, I like to feel the keys go down with a satisfying 'clunk', not a soft 'squish'.
    Membranes. Hate 'em!

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
  38. and put the control key back where it should be by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 3, Funny

    Too many of the new keyboards have the capslock key where the control key should be and used to be. Correcting this would make the keyboard more ergonomic. How often does anyone, aside from people writing Nigerian mail scams, use the caps lock? Odds are not as often as the control key, even for MS-Windows users.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
    1. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 5, Funny

      How often does anyone, aside from people writing Nigerian mail scams, use the caps lock?

      My friend, you've obviously never spent anytime on the AOL posting forums.

      Not that that is a bad thing.

    2. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How often does anyone, aside from people writing Nigerian mail scams, use the caps lock?

      Only when writing stupidly long #defines or enums (-ESOMETHINGTERRIBLYBADHAPPENED) The idea of having Caps where Ctrl is sounds like a nightmare; I'm personally far to entrenched in the left hand Ctrl+X, Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V editing mode to even consider switching. Eurgh.

    3. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you learn summit new every day don't you? I stand corrected; I never realised the Ctrl key used to be above Shift. Ah well, I was using Amigas and 8bits up until at least 1996, so what would I know about Sun/XT/AT keyboards?

      Ho hum...I'm still far to entrenched in the single-left-hand Cut/Copy/Paste to switch.

    4. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by Sunnan · · Score: 2

      I agree. Switching them would make sense because the control key is often pressed in combination with some other key, and having it far away makes it hard to hit.

      Capslock is a "toggle" button so it could reasonably be placed anywhere. I usually remove it completely - I mean, I haven't used it in a long time.

    5. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by Bishop · · Score: 3

      far to entrenched

      The answer is to make both keys Control. Then maybe make caps lock alt-numlock or something equally weird.

    6. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by falzer · · Score: 1

      I make caps lock change to ctrl and that's that. Two ctrl keys on the left. I'm never switching back.

      Can't remember off the top of my head how to change keys in Linux (it's pretty easy iirc), but here is how to do it in NT/2k/XP:

      Add a new key called 'Scancode Map' with binary data as follows:
      00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 1D 00 3A 00 00 00 00 00
      to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\Keyboard Layout

      (Ignore the space in Control inserted by slashdot.)

      Search google for more help on NT keybindings.

    7. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by archen · · Score: 1

      That's why I just dumped the caps lock all together. You can remap the keyboard on most OSes.
      Linux
      Windows
      On FreeBSD just use /stand/sysinstall , and go to the keyboard map section in the installer. There's actually a specific keymap that dumps the caps lock

    8. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by ftobin · · Score: 2

      Capslock is a "toggle" button so it could reasonably be placed anywhere. I usually remove it completely - I mean, I haven't used it in a long time.

      You obviously don't write C or C++ much (constants are in caps), or Eiffel (class names are in caps).

    9. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Funny?! How in the hell is this funny! Any idiot that has to use a caps lock key is... well, doing something I can't even imagine. Cheating at games, using AOL, something else as dumb?

      I keep cramping my left pinky all the time by trying to use the left CTRL key for shortcuts.

      Think about this- why does a keyboard NEED a caps lock key? For a mechanical typewriter (anyone remember those?), maybe. But for modern keyboards, why?

      enough rant

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    10. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CUZ A0L H4X0RZ OWNZ YER PINKY ARSE D00D !!!!!

      iwjehfb8745334!@@##@$NO CARRIER

    11. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by mselmeci · · Score: 1

      By cheating at games, are you talking about Marathon? (In Marathon, if you remap the run key to capslock, and turn capslock on, it makes you always run.)

    12. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by spudnic · · Score: 2

      Use the palm of your hand under the pinky to hit the control key without ever moving from the home keys. This works great, but it's even better if you build up the height of the front of the control key with a bit of electrical tape.

      I use vi for just about everything and use the CTRL-[ keystroke instead of having to constantly reach up for the ESC key. Using your hand to hit CTRL rather than a finger becomes second nature pretty quickly.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
    13. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that is the game(s) I was talking about- I heard much bitching about that key map.

    14. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by Kirkoff · · Score: 2

      Frankly, I use the capslock key a lot. I knew how to type before I took a typing class, but when I got in to one which was required for school, that was one thing they trained me on. I know that most people don't, even if they should, but I use it whenever I have more than one capital letter to type. It's much more ergonomic for me to type CapsLock-U-S-A than Left-Shift+U Right-Shift+S Left-Shift+A when I'm typing USA. I think that the conroll thing is a mix of learning it the "old way," and people who missed part of touch typing training.

      --
      There are exactly 42,935,718 letter sized sheets in a square mile.
    15. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      I almost never use caps lock unless I am typing whole sentances in caps (not often). For USA I just use lshift+U lshift+S lshift+A. Its not "correct" but it works better for me than hitting caps lock. I too often accidentally hit caps lock anyway.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    16. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by Kirkoff · · Score: 2

      But Adam, both you and I know you don't touchtype. :P

      --Josh

      --
      There are exactly 42,935,718 letter sized sheets in a square mile.
    17. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      I sorta do. :P

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    18. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      You give a bad example. It is actually easier to use shift keys for typing "USA".
      Here's what I did. I held down the right shift key with my right pinky. Then I hit the U with my right forefinger. With my pinky still on the right shift, I then hit S with my left ring finger, and A with my left pinky. That is 4 keystrokes by my count. Using capslock, you need to hit capslock, U, S, A, and then capslock again. That's 5 keystrokes, by my count.
      Even if you go by the more standard method of touch typing and use left-shift for typing U, you still count 5 strokes as long as you hold down right-shift for both S and A. 5 strokes ties with your capslock method. Of course for longer acronyms, such as TMTOWTDI, WYSIWYG, or CBDTPA, it makes more sense to use caps-lock.

      I don't even want to know how many keystrokes I've wasted by typing this stupid message.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    19. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by Sunnan · · Score: 1

      I do program C/C++ a lot, but pressing the capslock key for one (or a few) words? It's much, much faster to just hold the shift key. (I touch type.)

      The actual point, though, was that when I press control, I almost always press another key as well (as in, C-h or C-t or C-p), so it needs to be placed so I can easily do that. That's not the case for capslock. It could switch (back) places with control without becoming a "worse" button.

    20. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by ftobin · · Score: 2

      I can respect your opinion on that. 90% of the time I'm hitting ctrl and a button on the left-hand side of the keyboard, though, I am hitting ctrl-x or ctrl-z, so where it is now is probably a little better than the caps-lock location.

    21. Re:and put the control key back where it should be by jdeking1 · · Score: 1

      In 12 years of using Unix and Wintel machines and keyboards manufactured by Apollo, CompuAdd, Gateway, Dell, Micron, Compaq, Hewlett-Packard, NEC, and Sun, I have always had keyboards (on my machines, that is) with the control key in the lower-left corner, shift above that, and caps lock above that. With the exception of the Sun and Apollo workstations, all of the others also had complementary control keys in the lower right corner.

      I've seen keyboards with the caps lock and control keys swapped (I hate that!) but they've been rare. The new SunBlade machines at work have that layout, and I told the sysadmin that I didn't want that. I use the caps lock a lot - we use caps exclusively in our drawings (drafting, that is) per company rules.

      Not only that, but on a Wintel machine, it is only logical to have the two control keys in complementary positions; if you are going to swap caps lock and control, you should swap the other control key with the enter key, eh?

      --
      "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." -- Robert Heinlein
  39. Modvue by fattybob · · Score: 1

    Has anyone ever used (or worse still using) modvue keyboards. We used to say that they were made from old tank armour plating as the US army upgraded it's tanks. In reality they were "industrialised" IBM keyboards, with thick aluminium (aluminum for the ex-colonials) bodies/ chasis. these you could run over with a car and they would work I'm sure. They were great for making music with (drumming)!!

    At the same time, I alos encountered the sexisest keyboard ever, it came with an industrial IBM PC, and the positive feedback "clicky feel" of the keys was awesome! I bet it wasn't coffee proof though.

    These should all be sitting in Saudi somehwere now, assuming the court case about payment was settled.

  40. QWERTY by JPriest · · Score: 1
    "This layout, known as QWERTY for the first six letters in the layout, was originally designed to slow down fast typists by making the arrangement of the keys somewhat awkward! The reason that typewriter manufacturers did this was because the mechanical arms that imprinted each character on the paper could jam together if the keys were pressed too rapidly." - HSW

    Anyone think we will eventually move to Dvorak?

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:QWERTY by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

      No.

      People don't like to change something like that for the most part, so dvorak is left to us crazy geek types who have too much time.

    2. Re:QWERTY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      besides, that's bullshit. qwerty has keys that you're likely to press sequentially just far apart so that the hammers won't get stuck to each other. it has little to do with typing speed.

  41. more on keyboards by bagel2ooo · · Score: 1

    The odd thing I find is that my typing speed/accuracy changes fairly dramatically on the keyboard I use. My prized keyboards was made by Lexmark for IBM. The blasted thing feels like a hunk of steel and with the springs under the keys it has a beautiful tactility. I get these new keyboards now with their soft keys and it's like my fingers utterly lose track of where they are too be. I wonder if people get conditioned to that dramatic a level to the keyboard they use.

    --
    ( o ) one could say I'm rather baked
  42. Re:Buckling Spring, Capacitive Keyswitches Keyboar by BrainInAJar · · Score: 1

    I still my old IBM Model "M" keyboard. I love it... I've done everything to this board (including dropping it from a 4th story window, spilling countless liquids into it, dragging it across the road behind the car, etc.) and it still functions just as well as before. As an added advantage, the keys have caps that you can pry off, so when I made the switch to dvorak, I was able to keep the same keyboard, and not have a bunch of stickers all over the place. You can still buy them off ebay, I've seen them for sale (though, why anyone would want to get rid of one of these things is beyond me)

  43. Have a look at Cherry's G80 series ... by mali · · Score: 1


    If you don't like those membrane-type keyboards, have a look at Cherry's G80 series of keyboards.

    http://www.cherrycorp.com

    The G80-3000 keyboard is about USD 50,- here in Germany. Do I need to tell that all my computers (except for my preario notebook computer) use G80-3000 keyboards? ;-)

    --


    ---
  44. Modern keyboard stink by Ogun · · Score: 1

    And that is why I got one of these:

    MCK-142 Pro

    Sure, it costed a lot. On the other hand the things I will use the most with my computer is the keyboard, is it not? Nowadays I'm so used to the keyboard being programmable, I really could not live without it.

    Oh, and no friggin' windows keys. Never liked those.

    --
    I found a fast warez site: http://warez.it.kth.se
  45. !!!! NEWBIE ALERT !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note Ogun's 6 digit user number - proving Ogun is a NEWBIE - he is REALLY NEW to computers.

    1. Re:!!!! NEWBIE ALERT !!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just because his UID is high means that he is neither necessarily new to Slashdot or to computers. This could be a second, third or nth account, or he could have been AC for YEARS.

      You wouldn't make much of a lawyer with your powerfully analytical brain, would you?

    2. Re:!!!! NEWBIE ALERT !!!! by Ogun · · Score: 1

      Yes indeed. I'm so bloody new to computers that I am involved in writing hardware drivers for the open source clone of AmigaOS, AROS

      OTOH, It might just be that I fell for YHBT, YHL, HAND. :)

      --
      I found a fast warez site: http://warez.it.kth.se
  46. Worst keyboard? by gafferted · · Score: 1

    Was there ever a keyboard worse than the one that Compaq did with the space-bar split in half, where one half was backspace?

    1. Re:Worst keyboard? by perlyking · · Score: 2

      I use one of those, on the plus side its so old and worn out that its a bit clackety to type on which I like. I now however only use the right side of the spacebar when i'm using normal keyboards.
      I actually found the design offensive, by having half of the space bar a delete key they are insinuating that you will make one error per word (i.e you need the delete key as often as the space). The bastards!
      Best keyboard I ever used came with IBM terminals, it had 24 function keys and was programmable. It clicked really nicely and was tough.

      --
      no sig.
    2. Re:Worst keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all apple keyboards. apple makes the worst keyboards.

    3. Re:Worst keyboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talking IBM keyboards only? The "Chiclet" keyboard, as implemented by INTERACT on their 8088/Z80 home computer, was truly a pain in the ass.

  47. Happy Hacking Keyboard by wirefarm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Happy Hacking Keyboard is about the best new keyboard I've found. Good feel, no extra keys, remarkably small, but keys as big as an old IBM.
    From their site:
    - NO CAPS LOCK KEY
    - NO WINDOWS KEY
    - CTRL Key is in Right Position
    - Full Size Key Pitch

    They don't have any of those cutesy 'Shop on the Web' buttons that link you to long-dead dotcoms or even seperate number pad or arrow keys - this is a keyboard perfect for serious text editing. (Dare I say it? A real man's keyboard!)

    If you've ever used one, you probably know what I'm talking about...

    Cheers,
    Jim in Tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got three.

    2. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      I can see the advantages of the ctrl key, and no caps, windows.

      But... I dont understand where making you press two keys for home/end (or the lack of arrows, really) is useful. Perhaps if you grew up without them.

      When I'm coding, I love being able to Shift-end and Shift home all over the place.

      The arrows aren't that big of a deal, I suppose.

    3. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard by Mr.+Quick · · Score: 2

      i love my happy hacking2 keyboard, but i saw this SolidTek kb at a local Second Cup.
      solidtek kb
      actually the one i saw was black and wasn't wireless. i've tried to find more info on them, but i haven't had much success.
      i'd change one thing about the HH2 kb, i'd make the home/end keys single keys, chording on home/end is annoying.

    4. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      My configuration is that hitting pause will pause XMMS; alt-pause will skip to next song; and win-pause will repeat previous song. It's much easier than deiconifying XMMS or clicking the tiny buttons on GKrellMMS when I want to hear something else. Of course, the windows key is also mapped to meta, for programs that need it. I haven't mapped the menu key to anything useful, but I probably could...

      I also have a "power up/down" key (it's labelled with an equilateral triangle pointing left, like the key on old Macintosh keyboards which you pushed to power the machine on). I bound it to start xscreensaver.

      As you can see, I'm into binding the otherwise unused keys on my keyboard to useful actions. For this reason, I actually wanted to get one of those keyboards with the cutesy 'Shop on the Web' buttons just so I could come up with something useful to map them to, like, say, starting jEdit (<plug type="shameless">Emacs for the 21st century</plug>) or Galeon.

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    5. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I've been using this keyboard (the full $139 version) for several years now. I absolutely love it. The best part is, while you suckers are paying for yours, mine was free - I won it in a contest. Ha, ha!

    6. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Nice! I've independently come up with pretty much the same setup here --- only I set Scroll Lock to Super_L so I have another set of modifier keys. The one frustrating thing about the old IBM keyboards is that they don't have many extraneous keys.This is why I'll never buy a Happy Hacking keyboard, and why I've been tempted to buy one of those "Web keyboards" --- not because I need buttons for web sites, but because I'd effectively have 24 function keys!

    7. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      Those type of keyboards are basically laptop keyboards in a plastic case. The only thing they have going for them is that they're small. If you like the feel of laptop keyboards, you'll be pleased. Otherwise, you won't.

      pckeyboard.com has some, but their big clunky keyboards are more popular.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    8. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard by Mr.+Quick · · Score: 2

      thanks.

      i was looking to find a keyboard that was similar to my TiBook's, so maybe i'll investigate these a bit more.

      am i quite pleased with my HH2 though.

    9. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard by crucini · · Score: 2

      What software are you using? I'm guessing that shift-END = "end of document" and shift-HOME = "start of document". In vi, those are respectively "G" and "1G".No need to remove the hands from home row. And we use 'hjkl' instead of arrows.

  48. Bogus qwerty myths by salimfadhley · · Score: 1

    That nonsense about the guy inventing qwerty to slow people down is just a silly myth... read the truth!

    http://home.earthlink.net/~dcrehr/myths.html

    It makes no sense. It is awkward, inefficient and confusing. We've been saying that for 124 years. But there it remains. Those keys made their first appearance on a rickety, clumsy device marketed as the "Type-Writer" in 1872. Today the keyboard is a universal fixture even on the most advanced, sophisticated computers and word processors electronic technology can produce.
    .
    How could we get stuck with something so bad?
    .
    In this case, the answer lies in the old proverb about the early bird catching the worm. As far as the typewriter keyboard is concerned, being first was the whole ball game.

    1. Re:Bogus qwerty myths by Twylite · · Score: 2

      Thank you! This is absolutely true. The viperlair article even makes the accurate claim that consecutive letter have often been placed on opposite sides of the keyboard: this makes you alternate work between your hands, and reduces the possibility of hammers sticking, thereby increasing the rate of typing.

      You will also note that this concept of hand alternative is one of the two reasons for dvorak being claimed to be a better layout (the other being that the most commonly used English letters and punctuation are on the home row in dvorak.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    2. Re:Bogus qwerty myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, The article states that Qwerty was made to prevent keys from sticking at any typing speed. So reqardless of which reason for Qwerty that you believe. Qwerty is still a design to aid the machine and not the human.

    3. Re:Bogus qwerty myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please look at a Dvorak layout, and try some words on it. Dvorak is FAR BETTER at consecutive letters being on alternate hands than QWERTY is. I'm using one right now. Among other things, all the vowels are on the left, and the consonants on the right. Next time, don't listen when economists are claiming to know something about keyboards.

    4. Re:Bogus qwerty myths by Twylite · · Score: 2

      My point was that you alternate hands with both QWERTY and dvorak. Dvorak is designed to do this more, yes (assuming you are typing in English!). The viperlair author's implication was that hand alternation caused QWERTY to be slower, which is obviously nonsense.

      QWERTY was not designed to slow down typing, but rather to speed it up, given the constraints of physical collisions of typewriter heads. Thus the most common letters are organised on the home row or in convenient positions above it, but in such a way as lessen the liklihood of consecutively typing letters which have adjacent heads.

      dvorak by comparison is lousy at this - the concentration of common letters on the home row makes it very likely that, if there were physical heads present, there would be a jam. You would have to deliberately slow your typing to prevent this - something QWERTY was designed to avoid. On the other hand, dvorak is arguably better in a situation without physical heads, as you point out.

      I have used dvorak layout before, for several weeks. I decided to stick with QWERTY because (1) it will take me several months to get my typing to the same speed with dvorak (based on my current typing speed and the testimonies of others who have taken the plunge); and (2) everyone else uses it, which makes it irritating to use other computers (where I am not the sole user, and which I have to do quite a bit).

      Most particularly, I find it unreasonable difficult to type in password, because I tend to remember them as key patterns rather than character sequences ;)

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    5. Re:Bogus qwerty myths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay, you've got it right. There's just a lot of misinformation going around about which layout creates more hand alternation. Anyway, qwerty isn't really optimized based on the home row - touch typing as we know it now didn't exist at the time it was invented. If it had, we would have seen keys like "e" and "t" on the home row, under the home fingers, like it is in dvorak. Instead the more commonly-used vowels are kind of scattered all over the place, which hurts the hand alternation principle (you're less likely to type vowels consecutively).

      But yes, Qwerty was definitely a good design, back in the days of type bars.

  49. dishwasher safe by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    we used to run them through the dishwasher when they got too dirty - and they would work fine afterwards.

    reminds me of an urban legend/ it horror story about some IT guy telling some chick that she needed to clean out her machine and she ran it through the dishwasher.

  50. Noisy Please by HappyPhunBall · · Score: 1

    Something loud and clicky will do. Bonus points for a lack of Windows keys and super nifty email and internet buttons. IBM, Zeos, and old Keytronics rock.

    1. Re:Noisy Please by DGolden · · Score: 1

      I'd be happy enough with the windows keys, if only they had "meta" written on them (and "menu" written on the menu key rather than a picture of a menu)- or even little pictures of penguins..

      --
      Choice of masters is not freedom.
  51. As cached by Google... by nmnilsson · · Score: 1

    Here

    I pity anyone who mods this obviously karma whoring post higher than (3, Informative), though :-)

    --
    No sig to see here. Move along.
  52. And not just the original IBMs! by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

    I think the author of the article has hit it on the proverbial head though, they don't make them like they used to. I got my first PC about 12 years ago, some cheap clone. The keyboard that came with it was not IBM's, but it looks like a spitting image of the one on the top of the first photo of the article. It's a loud bastard, but the thing is still working.

    I've seen many a keyboard break apart, but that sucker simply refuses to die. Sure, it's a bit on the loud side, especially during those long nights, but the typing feel is excellent and it is still as good as new (I used to throw it against the wall when I got angry at Tetris ;-)).

    As for the more recent keyboards, I'm quite happy with my standard Toshiba keyboard. It's one of the membrane thingies, but still has enough resistance to give me a nice typing feel.

  53. Piling on... by Daniel+Rutter · · Score: 3, Informative

    My own review of the IBM 42H1292 and related 'boards is here, in case anybody cares.

    1. Re:Piling on... by frozenray · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, Dan. Where are my modpoints when I need them?

      Love your site, BTW.

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  54. An interesting but flawed newcomer by shumway · · Score: 1
    No, not me, friends...but thanks for looking!

    The Virtually Indestructible Keyboard caught my eye last week. Basically its a sealed silicon mat with raised keys, you can fold it/roll it/douse it/etc. An interesting option for wearables.

    It's nice and silent, but I've been using it for over a week and haven't been able to get up to speed. Main gripes: the keys require too much pressure, and they seem spaced too far apart. Someone else may be interested, though.

    --
  55. Amiga & Northgate Omni Key Ultra keyboards rul by Tekoneiric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as layout goes, the Amiga keyboards rock! They place the system options keys "Amiga keys" next to the space bar where they should be and there is actually a help key. Of course the Amiga OS knows how the use those keys far more efficent than Windows can use it's Windows keys. On the Amiga, left key is for global system hot keys and right is for app short cuts. But when it comes to physical construction, nothing can beat the Omni Key Ultra keyboard. I could kill someone with it. Plus when you press a key, you know it's been pressed. Since that keyboard supported the Amiga, although somewhat buggly in faster Amigas, it combined the best of both keyboards. -Tekoneiric-

    --
    *It's not what you can do for the Dark Side but what the Dark Side can do for you!*
  56. Re: split keyboards by Confuse+Ed · · Score: 1

    re:
    never learned to touch type ... hands sort of float over the keyboard and move back and forth

    I had the same problem when I got my very first split keyboard, but after a couple of weeks I mostly got used to it and am now a convert, although I do still occasionally go for the "y" key with the left hand etc., and they do slow down one-handed typing considerably (ie if you're on the phone, or using the mouse)

    A trivial solution for us untrained typists would be for split keyboards to be manufactured with the middle columns of keys duplicated, so that for example both the 6 and the 7 keys would be available for both the left and the right hands. It doesn't sound like a difficult thing to do, apart from increasing the seperation of the two keyboard halfs slightly, but I've not yet seen such a device

    One could try taking this to an extreme and purchase two non-split USB keyboards and use one for each hand! (If anyone has tried this I'd be interested to hear whether its worth it or not, I don't have any USB keyboards available to give it a go)

  57. Old IBM keyboards on P4 motherboards by Malk-a-mite · · Score: 1
    Since everyone loves Mr.Google, here is the cache of the last link in the story.

    Sadly it was a geocities.com page and overloaded the file transfer limit pretty quickly.

    IBM PS/2 Keyboard Modification For operation with some newer Pentium 4 motherboards

  58. Sun Balde Keyboard by ArminK · · Score: 1

    Most of the newer Keyboards are merely crap. Not heavy enough, too small space-bars, drop them on the floor and they are broken...

    Still not all of them suck:
    I got my hands on a brand-new SunBlade machine at work. The Keyboard has at least as good feel as my favourite 15-year old Cherry Keyboard at home. Nice, heavy case, some (but not too many) extra keys on the left hand side (and these are keys, not some small rubber buttons...)
    And it has USB too...

  59. Old IBM keyboards rock! by Chemicalscum · · Score: 1
    I am still using the IBM keyboard that came with my 1989 PS/2 30286.

    Every time I get a new box my wife insists on moving the IBM keyboard to it. She is a touch typist and swears that any other keyboard slows her down.

    It certainly has been a reliable old workhorse.

  60. Atari ST, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone here remember the Atari ST keyboard?
    (Heck, the whole computer was the keyboard :)

    It ranks as #1 on my list of worst keyboards ever,
    my 520ST was terribly mushy, and it wasn't even a membrane keyboard either.
    I seem to recall that back in the day, you could buy replacement spring-sets to stiffen the thing up: It was that bad.

    Atari still rules, though!

  61. BBC Model B by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    had a lovely keyboard.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
    1. Re:BBC Model B by jagos · · Score: 1

      Yeah it did didn't it.
      Was there anything bad about these little beauties? They were awesome. And to play elite on the original platform.... (well, the disk version anyhow, i'd imagine the tape version would be rather annoying). It had a very advanced BASIC for it's time, functions, procedures, an inline assembler, enourmous expansion capabilities (second processor anyone?) onboard provision fpr networking. Ah.
      One of these wonderous machines is basically the reason I'm an IT professional today.
      Again I say Ah.
      A built in rom filing system, with several free rom slots for eproms with applications on them. (I had WordWise, a nice, instantly avaliable word processor(non-wysiwyg though (what's the word for that? wysinwyg?)) and some sort of spreadsheet app. I always lusted after the many avaliable utility roms, but could never afford any. :(

      Hmm.
      Why does everything look pink?

      OK, so it was a little short of memory, (especialy if you had a floppy drive) it was expensive (who cares, my parents were paying way back then :) ) And it had no support for hardware sprites, so the games were nowhere near as flashy or numerous as for my Commodore64 owning friends.

      Ah nostalgia! (I've been looking for one on and off for several years now without luck. If anyone in Sydney, Australia knows where i can get on i'd be interested to hear about it.)

      Anyway, it's way past time I was in bed, Damn you Morrowind!!

  62. New Apple Keyboards rule for 1 month then suck by marcelus · · Score: 1

    I love the touch of the Apple Pro Keyboards. But the thing is, after a few weeks of heavy use (I mean strong and fast typing), the key feel is getting harder and harder. Plus they are not cheap thus buying a new one every month is not an option. They are crappy membrane keyboards just like every keyboard designed these days, though...

  63. Where to get new IBM Buckling Spring keyboards by andreas · · Score: 1

    Those guys have bought all of the spare parts and machinery from IBM/Lexmark:

    http://www.pckeyboard.com

    The IBM Buckling Spring is by far the best keyboard I have ever used. And the noise is a feature, once you start typing 10-20 cps.

    Go get one, while they still make them.

  64. IBM Keyboard - best I've used by bushboy · · Score: 1

    I'm still using my old IBM keyboard that came with a desktop I got second hand 5 years back.

    It's been abused, fused, mis-used, had beer, tea, coffee,pizza and soda spills and cleaned a few times, but is still rock-solid !

    The old desktop box is now a firewall, the 14" IBM monitor is on my devbox.

    So what's the deal these days ?
    Are there any good quality keyboards available anymore, or do they all suck ?

    The same applies to most the cases (available where I am anyway) - cheap and nasty metal that cuts your fingers - bleh !

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  65. Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple laptops are effectively unusable for unix users.

    I am a long-time Unix user. That means I need to have the Ctrl key to the left of the A key. This is a genuine need , not merely a want; it is based upon ergonomics. The Ctrl key is heavily used in unix, and it must be easily accessable. It cannot be off in the lower left corner of the keyboard where it is difficult to get at, and where it distorts the position of your left hand such that you can't easily type other keys while holding the Ctrl key down.

    Apple desktop keyboards are now all USB. They are all OK. The CapsLock key can be re-mapped into a Ctrl key.

    Unfortunately, even in this modern age, all Apple laptops have built-in ADB keyboards. The ADB keyboard is broken-by-design. It is, in general, not possible to remap the CapsLock key into a Ctrl key.

    There are some exceptions, but they are horrible kludges. They are horrible kludges because the original design of the ADB keyboard was a horrible kludge. The correct solution would be for Apple to re-design their laptop motherboards to use built-in USB keyboards. This hasn't happened yet. If you run Linux, use Debian's solution. For Mac OS X users, uControl claims to work. There are no solutions (that I know of) for either NetBSD or OpenBSD. Please note once again that the "solutions" above are in fact kludges, because of the original bad design of the ADB keyboard.

    Apple is (currently) ignoring Unix users! This is not merely speculation on my part. In an on-going email exchange I am having with an Apple employee (whom I won't name) in their marketing department, the Apple marketing person directly stated to me that Apple was catering to their historic Mac customers, and is purposely ignoring the Unix market. He also claimed that Apple would soon start paying more attention to the Unix market. I won't hold my breath. Apple has been ignoring Unix users for more than 10 years. I expect that trend to continue. (Also note that my Apple contact indicated that Macs would never ship with a 3-button mouse, even though Apple intended to port almost all X-window software and deliver it either on a CD/DVD or installed directly on each Mac's hard drive. How Unix friendly is a 1-button mouse with X programs that often require 3 buttons?)

    Apple has now lost two opportunities to sell me hardware. I really wanted an Apple laptop for their superior battery life, and for the PowerPC with Altivec CPU. (The Altivec is vastly superior to the x86 line for DSP.) Because I can't live with the broken-by-design built-in ADB keyboard in all Apple laptops, Sony and IBM sold me laptops instead. If Apple fixes this problem, they will sell me a PowerBook next year; if they don't, I'll still be running OpenBSD on x86 hardware, and wishing I could use a Mac.

    Apple Laptop Hardware Managers: I'm not the only unix user out here. Are you listening?

  66. Those new keyboards do work in Linux by dobratzp · · Score: 3, Informative

    There have been a number of posts complaining about how they have a new keyboard and it doesn't work in Linux. Well, though the Keyboard HOWTO doesn't mention it, these new keyboards work without modification to the standard X setup. That is to say, when you press an "internet" key, the X server recognizes this and recieves the scancode. All you have to do is map that scancode to a useful key, and presto, you have a functional internet keyboard.

    Step by Step:
    1. Swap keyboards (no need to reboot here)
    2. Run xev. Make note of the desired key's scancode
    3. Edit your .Xmodmap file to map the key to something useful (X provides the symbolic names F13 and above for situations like this)
    4. Run xmodmap .Xmodmap to tell your X server about your new keys.
    5. Configure your applications to recognize these new keys. For example, in enlightenment you can edit keybindings.cfg so that F13 starts XMMS.
  67. Keyboard Specialists by farfetched · · Score: 1

    Keyboard evolution seems to be similar to calculator evolution -cheaper ( yes, cheap...), multiple-function buttons, and jazzy looks...... but not to the extent of specialty markets! programmers, graphic artists, gamers, businessmen, stock-market fiends,CAD specialists, and the inevitable Linux keyboard...complete with a little penguin button I am sure of a set of niche markets...... SPECIALTY keyboards!! For programmers: extra keys, programmable for the C/C++ crowd and the colons, pipes, and the above-128 ASCII codes.... For graphics people: an RGB "mouse touchpad", layer functions, filter functions........ And what is it about the stupid keyboard and mouse connectors? Cheesy! Easy to knock loose, in the back of the machine, they flex on the motherboard...... and the da** MS OS wont allow connection to be broken so it wont work unless powered down, jiggled, then rebooted! ( reboot, sounds like MS ! I don't know about Linux, but I suspect the same sort of programming.... or is this a BIOS/Hardware problem?) I'd also like a joystick with a mouse switch/connector so I can use the joystick as a mouse ( programmable buttons ! throttles! x-y positions! should be easy! ) And why isn't the CMOS/Bios settings available to the OS to change? I might like to disable a drive or port while installing software, or to change the equipment attached to it..... ( hot swap for the personal PC isn't recommended, since the design engineers aren't allowed to spend time to actually design the things properly) Standardized connectors, properly labelled for the speaker connection, PWRON switch, Reset switch, HD LED connectors, so I dont need a magnifying glass to make the connections to the motherboard! Cases! hard to open, no room to get a hand in for connectors, not enough flow-through ventilation, poor mounting designs for the Hard drives...... Ideas and gripes, just like a programmer!

  68. A Dvorak keyboard makes more sense now than before by Sunnan · · Score: 5, Informative
    Where qwerty spreads things out so that all fingers are used frequently, dvorak causes you to use half your fingers far more frequently than the others.
    This is not true. The buttons on the home row are "aoeu id htns". All very common letters - and all on a finger of their own (except "id"). So all the fingers on both hands are used.
    Also qwerty relies a lot on alternating hands.. this is shown to be much faster than using a single hand to type a word.
    An analysis of almost any english text will show that qwerty alternates less between the hands than dvorak. Dvorak has all the vowels on the left hand, so you'll have to use it several times for almost every word.

    The thing with qwerty that bothers me the most is that it requires my fingers to dance over the keyboard all spidery, while dvorak only forces me to move my fingers once or twice per word. I worked as a translator one summer, typing all day long. After a while, my finger began aching. That's when I seriously began thinking of switching.

    Look: some economic students want to badmouth dvorak and promote qwerty for some rather silly reasons having to do with economic theory. I don't care about that.

    I've used qwerty for twelve years before I switched to dvorak. Now I use both (nothing but dvorak on my own computer, though). The switch wasn't that easy, but it was worth it. It took me a few days to learn it properly. (One of my friends learned it in one evening, though - she wrote freakishly fast almost right away.)

    More and more people are hearing of dvorak from the internet or their friends, and some of them switch. I know several people IRL (living in my town) who uses dvorak. In the typewriter age, switching to dvorak is a difficult and expensive task. In the computer age, switching is a manner of typing "setxkbmap dvorak" in the nearest xterm. (Have an image of the new keyboard layout on your screen, and look at it instead of at the keys. Keep the fingers on the home row. If you like it (it takes about a month to be good, though), you can mod your keyboard or get a special one.)

    Dvorak isn't the be-all and end-all of keyboards, but I think it's an improvement on qwerty, just as qwerty was an improvement on the abcde-style layouts before it.

    Dvorak won't miraculously cure your RSI (although it did help against my finger-aches) or make you become the fastest typist in the world (although the fastest typist in the world did use dvorak).
  69. Does anyone remember the old Omnikey by Northgate? by databank · · Score: 1

    I don't know about anyone else but my favorite was always the old Northgate Omnikey keyboard on my old 486. There was absolutely nothing special about the layout or the design and it was completely based on the original IBM keyboard layout (with a large key for the slash button).

    What was really great was the incredible feel of the omnikey. If you typed really fast, you would understand exactly what I mean. It had such a high response rate that when you held down a key to do a keyboard repeat, it litterally blew 4 lines of characters across the screen in a second. (As opposed to all the other keyboards I've used that only do it about 8 seconds.) It may seem odd to like a keyboard for being able to do something silly as an ultrafast keyboard repeat rate...but then again, I KICKED everyone's ass in DOOM..... (Of course as soon as they found out why I was able to run circles around them 4 of my friends went out and bought the same keyboard...ahh....rivalry!)

  70. Happy Hacking Keyboard Review: Good for Sun Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A couple of years ago, I obtained one of the Happy Hacking Keyboards, hoping it would lead to keyboard nirvana. Alas, it didn't.

    The Happy Hacking Keyboard has a Sun layout. This is great if you are used to the position of the BackSpace key on a Sun keyboard; it isn't good at all if you are used to the PC keyboard layout with the '|\' key directly above the Enter key, and the BackSpace key directly above the '|\' key.

    I have asked PFUSA to make a keyboard with the PC layout with respect to the BackSpace key, but having the Ctrl key in the right place. So far, they haven't. For now, I'll stick with my stash of IBM Model M keyboards, and re-program the CapsLock key.

    If you aren't sure that you like the Sun keyboard layout, you might not like the Happy Hacker's Keyboard either.

  71. Old school style (Keytronic) by p_trinli · · Score: 1

    Recently, I searched for a new keyboard, one that didn't have any freaking internet keys, screwy arrow keys, tiny backspace, or mushy response.

    I decided on a KeyTronic. It's "old school." No junk. Full size keys. Cheap too. Twenty-something bucks.

  72. I love thsi quote ;-) by Codeala · · Score: 1

    This site has a detailed guide on how to modify the I/O PCB to allow the Pentium 4 motherboard to comply with the keyboard.

    Yeah the keyboard is probably the most important, yet often overlooked, part of your computer.

    --

    Codeala - Just another mindless drone
  73. Google for rollover keyboard by jmichaelg · · Score: 2

    The feature you're looking for is called rollover. If you google for "rollover keyboard" you'll find plenty of keyboards that advertise multi-key rollover.

    FWIW, I just checked my Microsoft ergo keyboard and it'll accept up to 5 key presses before I have to release a key.

  74. I quite like this keyboard by just+another+cynic · · Score: 1

    I brought it home for work yesterday (with permission).

    It came with a Compaq ES40 server. It's black, has the keys on just the right angles, and it doesn't have those pesky windows keys (being a FreeBSD user, it's not like I need them). It also doesn't use up my minimal desk space with things I don't need, like volume/multimedia/etc controls.

    I've always had a distinct preference for "clicky" keyboards, but this one has changed my mind. It has a soft feel and it's very quiet, but it feels fantastic.

    Pity I had to order a $AU 130,000 server to get it...

  75. Old IBM "battleship" keyboards still available by mfago · · Score: 1

    As the article states, new buckling spring keyboards are available. This is the company that bought the design of the original IBM PC keyboard. The equivalent model is the "Customizer" for $49. Not a bad deal for those of us who hate crappy $9 membrane keyboards. Just don't type while your spouse is trying to sleep...

    FWIF, another company with great, although expensive ($150), programable BS keyboards.

  76. No Windows Key? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2

    That's too bad. My shareware keyboard macro program, mgSimply, allows you to use the Windows key as a modifier key. The benefit is the key significantly increases the number of keyboard macros you can have.

    If you use Windows XP,NT, or 2000, you'll need this patch.

    1. Re:No Windows Key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and then there's lovely LiteStep, which lets you do the same thing and more. (but no doubt harder to configure) Plus you don't have to ever see the start menu or icons on your desktop again, unless you want to. (and you don't need any patch for that!)

  77. Re:Amiga & Northgate Omni Key Ultra keyboards by jejones · · Score: 2

    The Avant Prime and Stellar keyboards (mentioned elsewhere in this thread; see the CVT web site for details) were evidently designed by the folks who did the Northgate Omnikey, and judging by a review I read, share its sturdiness. (The key reprogramming software runs under Windows; no word as to whether it will run under WINE.) Rather pricey at $150, but if you're at your keyboard a lot, it might be worth it.

  78. Re:Buckling Spring, Capacitive Keyswitches Keyboar by h2odragon · · Score: 1
    Not quite the same thing; the unicomps click; but they're still membrane switched, so they don't last.

    I just bought 10 real honest to $legal_notional_higher_power IBM model "M"s off ebay for $5/ea, shipped. Of 5 Unicomps i bought in 98, new, only the one on the "idle" terminal is still functional. ... all hail ibm "M"

  79. Keyboards are one of Microsoft's worst sins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have so managed to insinuate themselves into the computing landscape that it takes special work to buy an Alpha with a standard VT100 keyboard layout rather than one designed for Microsoft. Certainly anyone who makes extensive use of the Control and Escape keys hates the layout Microsoft has foist on the world.

    And it gets worse! I found I could not install Windows NT without using a keyboard that included the otherwise useless F1-Fhowevermany keys across the top. Why do I get the feeling that Microsoft employs no touch typists ?

    1. Re:Keyboards are one of Microsoft's worst sins by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The function keys aren't Microsoft's fault. IBM put them on the original PC, in a nice little set down the side, and then moved them to the top (and added a couple) to bring them into line with IBM 3270 terminals, so that people could use IBM machines everywhere, from PC's up to mainframes, with minimal changes to their keying habits.

      Of course, keyboard layouts were the least of the changes between green-screen terminal applications and PC's, but we're left with the result nonetheless.

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  80. Re:Smaller keyboards by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 2

    Yeah, let's hear it for smaller keyboards!

    I was quite happy with the keyboard provided with my Mac Classic II. It felt right, and only had the keys I really needed. The Mac was designed for heavy mouse usage, and the keyboard reflected that attitude.

    I don't really want the whole row of function keys on my home computer (at work it's different: I store all of my macros up there). Desk space is a minimum, and a reduced-size keyboard and a Wacom Graphire are perfect for my cluttered home desk.

    I never had a chance to try out those "chording" keyboard replacements, so I can't comment on those. Pity. They seemed like they could have been small, comfortable and fast - once you passed the learning curve.

  81. Find them on Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I too love the IBM Model M and will use nothing else. You can usually find them on ebay for 1-3 bucks. Best deal out there.

    Also, I don't know the type, but I have a couple that have the older five prong interface. I can see the back of my computer in a few years:
    5 prong > ps/2 > usb > new thing
    that's a lot of adapters!

  82. Is there pornography on your computer by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    I just got this banner ad when I went to that page...

    I like how that advertising touches two people.

    Column A: Wants to be pure and ethical, and doesn't want kids getting involved in the wrong thing.

    Column B: Doesn't want to lose even the smallest bit of porn. What if I saved in the wrong directory!

  83. Stupid folks .. by Draoi · · Score: 2

    .. can use this one[pdf] :-)?

    --
    Alison

    "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

  84. Competition? by miffo.swe · · Score: 1

    I feel that its probably the fierce competition and the fact that many dont give a rats *** if their keyboard is a pain to use or not. Maybe it doesnt matter when you only use the index finger? Im anyway sitting with my old trusty Keytronic, an aux-ps2 adapter and a heck of a keybd compared to the ones offered today. I tried a new and gave it away. Couldnt stand that the keybd actually gave way when i typed fast enough.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  85. based on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    based on a previous keyboard article/discussion here, I was able to find an IBM "clicker" keyboard for my now pure ibm desktop. No microsoft key, satisfying BANGring BANGring BANGring while typing. I learned on manuals, I hit keys HARD, ahhhh, this keyboard is sweet!

    I still suck typing, make just as many mistakes, but it feels better and is more fun! Ya ought to hear it if I get enthusiastic and am typing a rant! Sounds like a "thompson" keyboard!!! HAHAHA!

  86. Moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bind keys and key Maps are probably the single most usefull thing about keyboards. (apart from their ability to type =-)

    Sounds confusing ? try putting a little bit of card over the top of your keyboard with the combo's , and changes on.

    Christ mate I cant belive that you type 5 charachters for a pound symbol !

    BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  87. Maltron keyboards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It's difficult to beat a Maltron keyboard for comfort. But they're not cheap. Not at all.

    The Amiga 2000 keyboard was great in its day. Shame it's completely incompatible with anything else :-)

    One thing the Amiga got right was the provision of a key marked "HELP" in big letters, and the positioning of the control key. I think the numeric keypad may have also had brackets and maybe an equals sign... which helped a lot...

    Hey, how about a keyboard with LCD screens on the keycaps - _really_ switch to dvorak at the touch of a button :-)

    1. Re:Maltron keyboards by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      The Amiga 2000 keyboard was great in its day. Shame it's completely incompatible with anything else :-)

      One thing the Amiga got right was the provision of a key marked "HELP" in big letters, and the positioning of the control key. I think the numeric keypad may have also had brackets and maybe an equals sign... which helped a lot...


      I know, I miss the feel of my old keyboard.

      Maybe someday I'll get my Amiga up as a Linux terminal and relive my youth on my olde keyboard.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  88. Join the cult of "Model M" by frozenray · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This site is dedicated to the one and only real PC keyboard. Quoting from it: Geeks will debate about the best keyboard in existence long after the sun supernovas. I happen to really like the IBM Model M. The fact that I have collected more than two dozen of the keyboards is testament to that. Or that I am clinically insane.

    I have six of them: two at work, one at home, three spares (not that I think I'd ever need them, given the amount of abuse these babies can take, but I don't want to take any chances).

    --
    "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  89. I'm not spending that sort of money by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1, Troll

    for some bloody keyboard.

    Particularly when I can get brand new 104 key jobs for just US$5. Which means buying half a dozen at oncee. So every time someone (including myself) spills a cup of tea, a beer or a Bourbon & coke on a keyboard, I can throw it out (or they can take it home, clean it out & keep it) & just pull a new $5 keyboard out of the cupboard for them.

    People who spend $100 for a keyboard that will get coffee spilled on it within 4 months or whatever, are crazy.

    1. Re:I'm not spending that sort of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You go ahead and buy a new keyboard when your $5 breaks.

      Me, I can clean my expensive keyboard and keep that feel I'm so used to forever (ok, for at least a couple of decades).

    2. Re:I'm not spending that sort of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who spend $100 for a keyboard that will get coffee spilled on it within 4 months or whatever, are crazy.

      People who spend $30+ on a keyboard tend to be motivated to keep liquids and food particles away from it to protect their investment. Office workers who have an internal Help Desk that they can whine to for a replacement can routinely get away with this sort of abuse and therefore have very little inclination whatsoever to keep it clean. Of course if it takes a few hours or more to get a replacement (including mice), the motivation factor tends to go up. Likewise, if the abusers actually got their take-home pay docked for the keyboards/mice that got destroyed by their negligence, (you'd think) they would tend to be a little more careful around the company's (not their) equipment.

  90. Re:Buckling Spring, Capacitive Keyswitches Keyboar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    though, why anyone would want to get rid of one of these things is beyond me

    I got rid of mine when I gave away my PC XT in a long-distance move about six years ago... and yes I feel like a complete fool. I never realized how much I would miss that keyboard. Should have saved just the kb.

  91. Modern vs. old by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > our keyboards had chassis which allowed 'em to be
    > thrown off a 3-story building and still work -
    > barely dented.

    Yes, theeeeese newfangled wireless ones won't survive the fall, but at least you can still use them on the way down!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  92. I Love Buckling Spring Keyboards by warkeng · · Score: 1

    Been buying every surplus IBM Keyboard I can find at work - they only want $5 each for them. They are getting rare though as I have been only able to score three so far. Just love these things. The feel, the sound, the weight, the durability. You can crack walnuts with them that still go on and type stuff. Oh yeah, and the letters printed on the keys do not wear off - unlike a certain other monopolistic company's ergo keyboards.

    --
    -- Spammers: My E-mail server is in California. Consider yourself warned.
  93. NeXT keyboards rule by aunchaki · · Score: 1

    I used to work in an entirely-NeXT office. The NeXT keyboards were fantastic. They were heavy and had really great tactile key action -- without the loud clicking of the old IBMs. Unfortunately, they only worked on the NeXTs.

  94. 1/2 size w/ an eraser !! by gelfling · · Score: 2

    I'm using an IBM mini with a TP eraser pointer. It works nice. The key travel is not squishy but not long either. Like a Thinkpad really. And the eraser pointer is nice. It has it's own PS/2 mouse port in, so I plug in a Marble Mouse and switch off between Eraser and Marble.

    I also have a mini (no keypad) w/o no Eraser but w/ standard 'click' travel PS/2 keys.

    I also have a standard size with an Eraser but w/ standard click.

    I also have 3 Soft Touch that are whisper quiet.
    -all IBM KB's

    BTW there are companies that make lefthand keyboards and keyboards with detachable keypads that be attached on the left or right or made free.

    I liked the Happy Hacking compactness but felt that they were taking advantage of people at what, $70?

  95. MY First keyboard by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Was a PCXT 10 function button down the left side. It was STEEL and you could sled on it or bash someone's head in. Almost as heavy as the unit on a 3279. Then I had a PCAT with the 'standard 12/24 function keys across the top. Still STEEL. It weighed almost as much as small notebook machine.

  96. OmniKey / 101 - everything else is just a keyboard by Trinton+Azaleth · · Score: 1

    I used to collect keyboards. I have seen quite a number of them, inside and out. I collected about 30 or 40 of them, and then dissassembled all of them. I trashed all but two of them. The one was cool looking... the other is the one I use: an original Omni Key / 101 keyboard by Northgate Computer Systems. These are the best keyboards. These use independent ?solenoid? switches for every single key. You can press down any combination of keys, and the computer will recognize the combo. Modern keyboards glitz after you hold down about 5 keys. Some 3 key combos won't even work. If you play games a lot, you would know this... Why anyone would use a modern keyboard is beyond my comprehension.

  97. Re:Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uControl does work, at least on some machines, but having the caps lock led still toggle is annoying.

    I don't like it either, but I don't think that it is brokenness, just bad design. Apple didn't originally design ADB keyboards for Unix. Nowadays, even machines designed to run Unix mostly don't have the ctrl key in the right place.

    Oh and AFAIK the "correct" ctrl placement was originally more of a DEC thing than a Unix thing in general.

  98. They work well for a reason! by Trinton+Azaleth · · Score: 1

    Yes, I have one also, and guarantee there is no better keyboard... take it apart one day and you'll see why; It has independent switches for each key! None of this grid connection nonsense with membranes. Key combos using any number of keys can be done on the keyboard. All other keyboards glitz after holding down several keys at once...

  99. IBM buckling-spring keyboard can't be beat by elronxenu · · Score: 1

    IMHO the best keyboard in the world is the genuine IBM buckling-spring keyboard as used in IBM PS/2s.

    I've tried many different keyboards, and nothing beats the IBM. The reason is the positive feedback as soon as the key registers. Other keyboards are mushy - they have no "feel" when the key is pressed, or very little, but the IBM keyboard provides increased resistance just before the key fires, and decreased resistance after. I have done tests on other keyboards and found bad behaviour like the key fires without feeling any feedback.

    Sure the IBM is noisier than other keyboards but the feel makes a lot of difference to an impatient geek who needs to get those keystrokes entered ASAP! I get a good feel for if I'm typing the right thing whether I am looking at the screen or the keyboard or somewhere else entirely.

  100. Try Creative Vision Technologies by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    Pricey, but heavy and built solid. http://www.cvtinc.com/. The Stellar, with extra F-keys down the side, is a disappointment: I wanted extra keys, but the side F-keys send the same codes as the top F-keys. They have a Windows program to change key codes, but won't release the protocol and aren't interested in anyone writing a Linux version ("somebody else wrote it; we just re-sell it").

    1. Re:Try Creative Vision Technologies by Eil · · Score: 2


      A bit pricey?!

      I almost spewed my Pepsi all over the place when I saw they wanted $190 for the thing! I was lucky enough a few months back to stumble upon a used computer parts store that had a whole bin of older IBM PS/2 keyboards (clickey and post-clickety). I bought myself a post-clickety and kinda wish I'd have sprung for another one or two, though I don't see myself using one as my primary keyboard. I fancy most of the keyboards that Dell has made... this one at work for example (called a Dell QuietKey) is quite nice.

      Oh yeah, and I refuse to buy any keyboard which has a crapload of them media and internet buttons built-in.

  101. Actually, it was more than an urban legend... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    Have you ever used one of the old-style typewriters? I have. Hitting any two keys within a very short period of time caused the mechanism to jam, as the doodads that bashed the character through the ribbon got tangled up. The engineers of the day designed (and re-designed) the keyboard to short-circuit the hot-shot lightning typist ladies (I'm not being sexist, they were mostly female) to allow those doodads to fall back into place (mostly by gravity) before the next one hit the platten.

  102. Microsoft again by Dexter77 · · Score: 1

    Once again I blame M$ for these new keyboard designs. I was totally happy (and still am) with plain keyboard design until around '95 first versions with windows(tm) keys came in to stores. Damn I hate those windows(tm) buttons, they make SPACE smaller and move ALT to wrong place. Nowadays it's almost impossible to find keyboards without windows(tm) keys and my guess is that in five years all you can get is multimedia-natural-wireless-silent-etc keyboards.

    1. Re:Microsoft again by EllF · · Score: 2

      Have you ever checked out the Happy Hacking keyboard line? They offer keyboards with the Sun Type 3 layout and only 60 keys - none of this "windows" key nonsense. :)

      Check them out!

      (Sorry to sound like an infomercial. Sometimes, you just find something really spiffy, and *want* other people to dig it, too...)

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
  103. Re: foam switches by wideangle · · Score: 2

    Spilt coffee into my Microsoft Natural Keyboard and two keys stopped working.

    So I tried to wash it.

    Now all the keys don't work.

  104. With all this talk of ergonomics by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

    I feel compelled to point out i've been typing pretty much every day for the past 10 years. I dont' do that home-row nonsense.. my fingers float over the keyboard, my hands move a lot, my writs stay straight usually, as my 'angle of attack' is crooked. I've completely stopped thinking when i type, so, obviously, it works. And i can go at about 90 WPM.

    It messes me up to no end when i get on the "natual" keyboards.. they cramp my style, and my wrists.

    1. Re:With all this talk of ergonomics by QuoteMstr · · Score: 1

      Me too! People are amazed at my typing speed, but I've never taken a typing class. I use the same method you do --- allowing my fingers to hover roughly over the center of the keyboard and bringing them down whenever I need to type something. I type about 120 WPM.

      I share your feelings about natural keyboards. I have a model M (the clicky ones) IBM keyboard, and it's the best typing device I've ever had.

  105. Poll Suggestion: by Asprin · · Score: 2

    How old is your keyboard?

    a) new
    b) 1-2 years
    c) 3-4 years
    d) 5-8 years
    e) 8-10 years
    f) >10 years
    g) Keyboard? I use the Apple CowboyNeal Lightpen!


    Believe it or not, I'm typing this on the same Northgate Omnikey 102 I bought twelve years ago - in December, 1990!

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
    1. Re:Poll Suggestion: by jrobertray · · Score: 1

      Model M
      Part No 1391401
      Date 29FEB88

      So, my keyboard is ... uh, 3.5 years old?

    2. Re:Poll Suggestion: by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 2
      How old is your keyboard?

      a) new
      b) 1-2 years
      c) 3-4 years
      d) 5-8 years
      e) 8-10 years
      f) >10 years
      g) Keyboard? I use the Apple CowboyNeal Lightpen!

      I'm typing this on an IBM model M. Made in USA, so you know it's old. The date on this one is 10-14-92, so it's (e), almost to (f).

  106. QWERTY used to slow typists down -- false by wonderdog · · Score: 1

    The article erroneously propagates the urban legend that QWERTY was developed to slow typists down. The QWERTY design was developed to prevent jamming by placing most often used keys at opposite ends off the board. Prevent jamming != slow down.

    The Economist ran an article in April of 1999 about the various studies comparing the layouts. Very minimal, if any, advantage to Dvorak.

    1. Re:QWERTY used to slow typists down -- false by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we all know that The Economist is THE authority on keyboard design.

      Really. Next you'll be asking Microsoft to rewrite the tax brackets.

  107. Non-English layouts by leandrod · · Score: 2

    I found that PCKeyboard does still provide the old IBM BS keyboards, and they even promise to deliver soon 105 (non-English) keys layouts with the stick!

    Too bad there's nor Brazilian Portuguese neither Swiss French layouts, and those are the ones I'm after.

    I would like to get a layout that once was created specifically with the same goals as the Dvorak one, but tailored for Portuguese&hellip;

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  108. Slower and Faster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please stop repeating myths. Qwerty was not designed to slow down typists. It was designed to prevent hammer jams. If you think about it, putting closely-spaced keys (say "t" and "h") on opposite sides of the keyboard actually speeds things up.)

    The fact that Dvorak was biased has been covered before.

  109. Here's an ACCURATE history of the Qwerty keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The myth that Qwerty was designed to slow-down typists is not quite correct. This paper provides an accurate (and scientifically peer-reviewed) history of the keyboard:
    Yamada, H. (1980) A historical study of typewriters and typing methods: from the position of planning Japanese parallels. Journal of Information processing, 2(4), pp. 175 - 202.

  110. ADB - USB converter by Pope · · Score: 1

    I got one when I bought my G4 so I could use my Apple Adjustable Keyboard, which by my experience is the only "ergo" keyboard to have. Unfortunately the left Command key died, and it's hell to use without that.

    I highly recommend the Macally iKey: full-size keys and no extra "internet" keys or other crapola.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:ADB - USB converter by prog-guru · · Score: 1

      I'm using the iKey on a G4 now. The spacing is great, but I wish the action was lighter.

      --

      chris@xanadu:~$ whatis /.
      /.: nothing appropriate.

  111. Here's a mirror by sandviper · · Score: 1

    http://207.139.42.198/articles/keyboard/keyboard.h tm BTW: Welcome guys :)

  112. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard Review: Good for Sun Onl by alue · · Score: 1
    Really the thing that makes this keyboard so great IS the Sun layout. Before when I was using a regular 104-key PC keyboard, I had to remap the keys all the time, and no matter how many different layouts I tried, I found that I'd always go back to Sun. Why:
    1. The Esc key is in a place where you can reach it; how the heck are you gonna use Vi w/the Esc key way up in the corner of the keyboard?
    2. The Control key is also in a more practical place; you have to use it all the time for Emacs and shell work.
    3. Having the Backspace/Delete key right above the Enter key is actually more natural, since you don't have to move your hand out of the way to reach, and since it's one of the keys you use most frequently.
    4. You also need the Backslash|Pipe and Grave|Tilde keys for coding and scripting, and on the Sun layout they're in reasonable locations
    It's really difficult to perform Unix operations on a regular PC keyboard, because of the placement of the keys. Control and Esc are really not used all too much in a Windows environment, so moving those keys out of the way to make room for others makes sense--and since most Desktops are running Windows, it's obvious why standard keyboards have this layout.

    Ever since I started using Linux I've thought that the keyboard layout is going to have a surprising lot to do with making Linux mainstream. Of course if you use GUI's full-time, the keyboard won't matter so much, but to get people to use the command-line--which I think needs to happen if Linux is going to make it--a layout like Sun's has to find its way into the mainstream too.
  113. Re:i don't think keyboards are your problem (OT) by lingqi · · Score: 1

    that's what i figured; -- not the UK part, but the office layout you are probabbly at.

    FYI, japan is almost exactly the same way... so you might feel at home working there.

    i personally don't think that it's a good idea -- i mean, cube farms in the US is lame and all, but i would still prefer fake walls than half-height, see-your-neighbor-pick-his-nose situations.

    maybe there is a "thinking room" you can goto with a laptop for the "thinking times"...

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  114. QWERTY slow? by codeButcher · · Score: 2, Interesting
    QWERTY was originally designed by Christopher Sholes to slow typing down. [...] If a typist typed two letters one after the other too quickly, the "hammers" would hit each other; the typist then had to dislodge the hammers and that could get a bit messy. So, Sholes came up with a keyboard layout that would place letters which would be most likely struck closely in succession on opposite sides of the layout.

    I believe he chose the layout to SPEED UP typing. I mean, do you know how slow you type when you have to untangle hammers all the time???

    --
    Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
    1. Re:QWERTY slow? by huckda · · Score: 1

      My typing teacher in high school would type in excess of 100 wpm on one of those OLD OLD OLD hammer/stroke typewriters...AND...she had to manually carriage return as well...

      Typing is about reflexes, and read-ahead so your brain->finger que is full and your fingers are reflexively spitting out the que to the keyboard.

      I also feel it has a lot to do with WHAT text is being typed. If it is coming from your mind or if you are reading someone's writing and typing it up or if you are reading a printout etc. etc.

      All I know is play on PK MUDS for a few years and you'll KNOW how to type and fast!...or have a really pathetic character from dying so much.

      --Huck

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  115. Re:i don't think keyboards are your problem (OT) by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

    thinking rooms? laptops? man-speak-foreign-tongue.

    This building houses a couple of thousand people on 5 floors. there's 4 meeting rooms on each floor, ech holding a maximum of 10 people...

    Only Senior Managers are Important enough to have laptops - and even if I were a PHB, and managed to aquire a laptop, and find a spare(ha!) meeting room - theres no network jacks in the meeting rooms.

    We're a FTSE 100 company, the offices are a joke!!!

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  116. Re:Best Keyboard Ever is NOT the TVI925 by Jay+Carlson · · Score: 1
    Gahhhhh, not the 925. Just about every keyboard of that era had HUGE springs under every letter---it HURT to press them down.

    I've got one in storage, and whenever I pull it out I'm dismayed at what I put up with back then.

  117. Re:Today's Keyboards... "zero tilt" = RSI-buster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I had hand/wrist problems from constantly holding my hands in a poised uptilted angle while awaiting responses from the computer. I found relief in making sure the keyboard was at least completely horizontal, if not actually tilting opposite to usual practice by having the near (space bar) edge higher than the far (function keys) edge, and, in fact, a "workstation ergonomics consultant" at a big company I used to work for pointed out that the best keyboards have elevation adjustments for exactly that purpose. Just think about how your hands normally are positioned when holding your forearms out perpendicular from your body -- the hands tend to dip down, and keybooard positioning that bends them up from that orientation is definitely stressful.

    ROC

  118. And the 9' cord that came with the PS/2 Servers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gotta have one of these!

  119. Original Alto keyboard by Animats · · Score: 2
    One of the best keyboards ever was the one on the original Xerox PARC Alto. That thing had a machined casting as the frame and case, and was very heavy. But it wasn't that big; no function keys or other useless buttons. The keys had good tactile feedback. The original PARC mouse, though, wasn't very good.

    A few of those original keyboards are still in use, twenty years later.

  120. Re: split keyboards by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2
    One could try taking this to an extreme and purchase two non-split USB keyboards and use one for each hand! (If anyone has tried this I'd be interested to hear whether its worth it or not, I don't have any USB keyboards available to give it a go)

    I've seen a web page of a guy that's done this - he cut the two keyboards apart, and has them taped to the side of his chair, so that his arms hang down by his side, and rest on the keyboards :-)

    Sorry - can't find the link. I think he did it because he had RSI/similar problems.

    Tim

  121. Re:A Dvorak keyboard makes more sense now than bef by bhhenry · · Score: 1

    A great thing about the IBM Model M is that you can pop the letters off the keys and re-arrange them quite easily to a new layout.

    --
    signature not found
  122. Pause break... by Viceice · · Score: 1

    I hate those keyboardss that have the soft power button where Pause Break was. I can't forget working for 2 long hours and sudde

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  123. ESC CTL Emacs by hedley · · Score: 1


    If you use emacs, the ESC and CTL keys should be in the correct place. That correct place is, ESC next to the 1, CTL where most PC kbds place the capslock key. How can this be resolved?

    1) Sun's have the correct layout
    2) Happy Hacking Kbd works well but is a tad too small for me (although I own one).
    3) The Maxiswitch MaxiPro2 kbd. This was a great kbd, I have 2, one at work one at home. What is great about this keyboard is any pair of keys can be swapped, i.e. ESC and ~, CTL and CAPSLOCK. (the capslock on the maxiswitch is a non spring locked key). The only thing is that CTL has CAPSLOCK written on it. Confuses people that come to use my kbd.

    Hedley

  124. Lace cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you punched a card that was all holes, did it get stuck? That is the real test of a card punch :-)

  125. Zeos! by Enahs · · Score: 2

    The company got absorbed by Micron, true, but a ca. 1990 Zeos keyboard is every bit the keyboard a Model M is. Well, okay; it doesn't have drainholes (great idea!) or interchangable cables but it feels great to type on and could probably pass the 3-story test. I've got one stored away in a closet; I switch back to it when whatever my latest keyboard happens to be decides to crap out.

    --
    Stating on Slashdot that I like cheese since 1997.
  126. Laptop Keyboards by cmallinson · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who likes typing on a Laptop? I've got a standard Dell C600. The lack of a keypad is a downside, and for gaming there would be issues, but for sitting down and typing a letter, or for coding, I love it. The tactile feedback is great, and your fingers don't have to move much.

  127. Why do keyboards suck so much? by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

    I've been looking for a specific keyboard for a long time, and the PCKeyboard "Customizer" is close, but is not USB. Basically, I have these requirements, in order of priority:

    * key layout with the backslash ABOVE the enter key... top row after the equals is fine, but second row after the close bracket is acceptable. Fourth row after shift is NOT.
    * USB
    * clicky
    * No windows keys.

    Or, if there is some way to convert AT/PS2 keyboards to USB, then I'd just get that customizer and the adapter... I don't even know if that's feasible, so I haven't been looking for the adapter.

    If anyone has any idea where to look, that's be great, I'll keep scanning the comments, though.

    -If

    --
    Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    1. Re:Why do keyboards suck so much? by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, and:

      * Not ergonomic - standard keyboard shape and size.

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    2. Re:Why do keyboards suck so much? by nels_tomlinson · · Score: 2
      Or, if there is some way to convert AT/PS2 keyboards to USB, then I'd just get that customizer and the adapter... I don't even know if that's feasible, so I haven't been looking for the adapter.

      It's feasible. All the mice I've bought recently have included a ps/2 --> USB adapter. A fancy new Microsoft Natural keyboard I tried at work came with such an adapter. All of these adapters, serial --> ps/2, ps/2 --> AT, ps/2 --> USB, seem to be simply two connectors with wires joining the appropriate pins.

      By the way, I'm typing this on one of those wonderful IBM clicky-clacky keyboards. I have one for home, and bought another one with my own money for work, to replace that slimy Mickysoft Natural. The old Selectric keyboard was perhaps the zenith of keyboards, but the IBM Model M ain't bad.

    3. Re:Why do keyboards suck so much? by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      Hmm, with http://store.yahoo.com/pckeyboards/cus101usenon.ht ml and http://www.usbgear.com/usa/item_92.html

      (which I found separately after scouring the comments here)

      I think I can assemble the perfect keyboard. I suppose I should try the ps2->usb adapter that came with my mouse, but it seems that there might be more to it than that... if it doesn't work, I'll just order the adapter thing from usbgear... yay! With the adapter, it ends up being about $75 per keyboard, though. :|

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    4. Re:Why do keyboards suck so much? by bjb · · Score: 1
      A fancy new Microsoft Natural keyboard I tried at work came with such an adapter. All of these adapters, serial --> ps/2, ps/2 --> AT, ps/2 --> USB, seem to be simply two connectors with wires joining the appropriate pins.

      Just to point it out, I think there may be more to the PS/2 USB adapter than let on here. In the manual for the Microsoft Natural keyboard, it mentions that the USB adapter will only work for the Microsoft keyboard. I'd love to hear otherwise, but I am led to believe that there is some circuitry in the keyboard that detects if the adapter is being used, and then sends different signals down the wire to work with USB. I haven't tried any of this yet (since my PC at work where I have this keyboard doesn't do USB [NT4]), but I still have the adapter otherwise.

      Just for the sake of people who haven't seen it, the MS keyboard basically has a standard PS/2 cable, but they included a 10" wire that has a female PS/2 adapter on one end and a USB connector on the other. Really looks like nothing special, so I'm suspicious if the keyboard does something, or if it really is that simple to go PS/2 to USB.

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    5. Re:Why do keyboards suck so much? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I think I can assemble the perfect keyboard. I suppose I should try the ps2->usb adapter that came with my mouse, but it seems that there might be more to it than that... if it doesn't work, I'll just order the adapter thing from usbgear... yay! With the adapter, it ends up being about $75 per keyboard, though. :|

      Why not just use the PS/2 keyboard and mouse ports on your computer? That's why they're there. It'll save you a ton of money. (Unless you're stuck with some ghey machine that uses USB for everything, but then you have other problems...)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  128. Re:Buckling Spring, Capacitive Keyswitches Keyboar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a while a company called Maxi Switch made IBM-branded keyboards that were just like the model M, except that they were black and have a built-in TrackPoint. It also has a PS/2 mouse port on the back, so you can switch between the two depending on what you're doing. I know a lot of people aren't fond of the TP, but for those that are, this is probably the ulitmate keyboard. The FRU# is 13H6710, but I don't know as though you can get new ones anymore. Mine isn't for sale ;)

  129. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard Review: Good for Sun Onl by GigsVT · · Score: 2

    and since most Desktops are running Windows, it's obvious why standard keyboards have this layout.

    It really had nothing to do with that, the way I understand it. IBM based the more-or-less current PC keyboard off the IBM Selectric electric typewriter. I can vouch for that for the most part, we still use Selectrics where I work for typing up things that don't translate easily to computers, like forms people send in.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  130. But there's no '@' on the C64! by KI0PX · · Score: 1

    I used to use my C64 as a linux terminal, until I realized that there was no '@' above the '2' (there's " there instead), making it very difficult to send e-mail. I'm sure there's a way around it, but with the C64's horrible screen resolution, it wasn't worth it. Back to Speed Racer.

    1. Re:But there's no '@' on the C64! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just use the '@' key? It's right next to the 'P'.

  131. Three Handed Input by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of my standard quips when talking about assisitve technology (AT) and alternative input (including -- among other things -- voice recognition, one handed keyboards, head operated mice, etc.) is that we are using computers that are optimally designed for beings with three hands. Two hands on the home row, simultaneous with your dominate (usually right) hand on the mouse. Moving from home row to mouse wastes time, but the keyboard and mouse, when considered in isolation from each other, are each very efficient and comfortable.

    The solution won't be in any of the AT I've seen and Star Trek doesn't even offer a clue. The input device of the future will build on the QWERTY layout all of us have invested so much time with, but won't require this archaic predisposition, and be at least as "intutive" as the mouse for GUI functions. But it won't require a break to go from keyboarding to mouse and will not imply that we should have two right hands. Can anyone here imagine what this interface might look like?

  132. Re:Amiga & Northgate Omni Key Ultra keyboards by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

    I can vouch for that. My hands have been bothering me after working at the office using a generic Compaq keyboard, but I can go home and work on my Avant Stellar for hours and not have any trouble whatsoever. I'm using the misnamed ctrl2cap utility to map the caps lock key to a control key on my work keyboard, which helps somewhat, but my hands still feel achy at the end of the day.

    --
    Just junk food for thought...
  133. Great place to get Model M's by Valkyre · · Score: 1

    Public Schools. Most have a hazardous waste room (filled with other obsolete goodies as well, such as A/V monitors and tape decks) that have loads of outdated equipment. Sadly, they ship it off to omewhere to be hazardous landfill.

    Ask the technology dept. head, most are glad to be rid of em', and you could pick up some nice PS/2s in the process (your on your own for microbus 10bT cards, though).

    --
    What the heck is a 'sig'?
  134. IBM Clicky Keyboards by quadra · · Score: 1

    There is a company who still manufactures the IBM BS keyboard and also refurbishes used ones. It's at pckeyboard.com> . They've even got versions with the evil windows key.

  135. Re: cutting keyboard in two by Confuse+Ed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I probably saw the same thing: just found it here (and google found me another page on fully split keyboards).

    However the reason for my suggestion of two keyboards was to make some (ie the middle columns), or even all, of the keys available to both hands, for those of us who don't touch type by the book

    I find myself not keeping my hands in the recommended typing positions mostly because all of the symbols which form a large percentage of the source code of most computer languages would be rather uncomfortable to type, notably the }, )and Tab (if you're using emacs or anything with tab completion) characters one a qwerty keyboard which have very high frequencies in java and c++ (and the problem is even worse on a dvorak layout, which is great for typing English, but terrible for c++).

    With the whole keyboard repeated, I'd be able to type like back in the bad old days of non-split keyboards and let the other hand drift over momentarily whilst typing a back-tick, Escape or a } (or worst of all a "Page Up" (well not quite the worst, when some software forces you to have to reach for the mouse .... grrrrrr)) rather than having to either stretch excessivly or wait for the correct hand to get back in place.

    Using a USB keyboard solves the problem of needing some kind of ps2 Y splitter.

  136. keyboard computer by ece · · Score: 1

    What's the name of that keyboard that had 450mb hard drive some 486 proc(I think) and network jack? It's one computer in a keyboard. I remember seeing it on ebay.

  137. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard Review: Good for Sun Onl by cobar · · Score: 2

    You can use Ctrl - [ as an alternative to Escape in vi. Makes things much nicer.

  138. Microsoft split keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have never seen one, but my wife says Microsoft managed to produce a "split" keyboard whose line for splitting the keyboard was _not_ between the keys that are supposed to be pressed with the left fingers and the keys that are supposed to be pressed with the right hand.

    Perhaps the dominating factor was not the trained typist but how to fit it into the shipping box.

  139. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard Review: Good for Sun Onl by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    So they still base their keyboards on 20 year old typewriters? I can see this being the original reason, but give me a fucking break about this why the keyboard is the way it is. Otherwise all our keyboards would have little dials on the side to scroll our text up so we could apply electronic white-out.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  140. Ergo Keyboards and the Broad Shouldered by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I've seen have used membrane technology, but I have always been a believer that ergonomic keyboards not only hinder a typist, but also do not relieve any stress from typing. I never proved that of course, but I've always felt more "natural" with standard keyboards. An article was just released at the BBC, describing how ergonomic keyboards might not be as helpful as many might hope to believe."

    As fate would have it, I'm a big guy. I wear either a XXLT or XXXLT shirt. Given that I have broader shoulders than most, I find that an ergo keyboard to be very much more comfortable than regular rectangular keyboards.

    I *suspect* that there's a number of variables that play a role in whether or not a person finds ergo keyboards to be a significant improvement over conventional keyboards.

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  141. Anybody Else Like The OEM Logitech Keyboards? by donovansmith · · Score: 1

    I'm also a big fan of the feel and layout of the old IBM clickers, but they are just too loud. The next best thing is the keyboards that Logitech makes for OEM use by companies like HP and Compaq. They come in a variety of sizes and some with extra multimedia keys, but otherwise have the same 104-key layout with the backslash key above a rectangular enter key and the double-key size backspace key. Since they are membrane keyboards they don't have as much tactile feedback as the old clickers, but are also not nearly as loud. They are a little stiffer than the clickers, but to me it actually feels better to type on. Best of all, the keyboard I got came free with the HP Pavilion I bought over 2 years ago (only the original mobo and CPU remain...everything else on the machine was replaced over time). But I doubt this thing will hold up for 15 years and still feel like it did when it was new, like the IBM clickers do.

  142. I adore my '64... my Commodore 64! by Phantasmo · · Score: 1

    Actually, Commodore made some pretty nice PC keyboards - I've got one in front of me. Nice angle, and the keys are a joy to clatter away on!

    --

    The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  143. sometimes you just get lucky... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 2

    I was driving down the road, passing by Micro Center, and some voice in my brain said "why don'tcha see what they have?" So, I did this, and they had a crapload of new Type M keyboards. I bought two of them for $5 each, and have been happy as a clam ever since. Both were made in Scotland by IBM (or at least with IBM tags on it) in 1999.

    Since then, I dunno if I would be willing to pay $49 for em.

  144. Ergonomics are for WIMPS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    REAL computer users seek out more extreme forms of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome!!!!

  145. Many years ago... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2
    ... home computers had horrible membrane keyboards. The more up-market ones had rubber keys that pressed on the membrane, and the more upmarket still had plastic buttons that pressed a rubber sheet, which in turn pressed the membrane. They were horrible, and roundly denounced by computer users. Real computers had "clicky" keys with wee springs and little contacts, and sometimes magnets and reed switches.

    Now, almost all PC keyboards, even the very best, use the horrible "plastic-rubber-membrane" setup. And they are indescribably vile.

  146. I was (probably) first in the world to break one by Xtifr · · Score: 2

    I believe that one of my claims to fame is that I was the first person in the world to break one of the original IBM PC keyboards. I was a contractor working for one of the companies that IBM hired to create the software for the initial release of the PC, working under severe secrecy and harsh NDAs. A few weeks before the actual release of the PC, I managed to knock one of the keyboards of our sample machines off a desk, jarring loose several keycaps, and causing some damage to the internal circuitry.

    Ever since then, I've found it ironic when people refer to these keyboards as "indestructible". Although I freely admit that they are great keyboards, possibly the best ever made for any computing equipment anywhere.

  147. Me & My Model M by chriton · · Score: 1

    I absolutely reFUSE to get rid of my IBM Model M keyboard. It's so much easier to type quickly on them that the mushy thing I have to use at work.

    My boyfriend, however, gets really irritated by the sound it makes. He's tried to get me to use alternate keyboards several times, but I keep coming back to old c^Htrusty.

    Now... about putting it in the dishwasher... I'll have to think about that. It certainly could use a cleaning. I suppose one should remove the ICs first. Has anyone else perpetrated this insanity and lived to tell about it?

    --
    "Bishops and Bookies live off the irrational hopes of mankind." Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:Me & My Model M by colenski · · Score: 1

      yup no heat no soap & let it dry for a couple weeks works fine if you don't have hard water

  148. HEY, THATS MY KEYBOARD. by ResQuad · · Score: 0

    The scary part about looking over this article is that in the picture the top keyboard is the exact same keyboard I am using right now (as in typing this post with it). I like this old click-ity keyboard, they give a nice solid feel. MUSHY BAD.

  149. NMB RT2200 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used an NMB board throughout all my PC experience, and I am an absolutely devout fan. I ran a very plain NMB RT6656TW for something like 6 years and all other boards I had tried were inferior. The key travel and tactile feel were perfect in my mind. It also included full backspace and backslash keys, which most of us who use a kb for hours a day think are completely essential. The only thing about the board that I disliked at all was the volume. When typing relatively stiffly, it would click quite loudly (not the mechanical double-click like my old board from a 286 :). I was looking around for some new NMB boards and found my savior... NMB RT2258TW. It has the identical travel and resistance as the 6600s, except with a modern membrane so it's markedly quieter. www.thenerds.net has them for ~$8 -- STOCK UP!

  150. Re:Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Mac had no Ctrl key, and its keyboard subsystem could not generate the ASCII control codes, from 1984 to 1987. The Mac got a Ctrl key in 1987, and ever since then Apple has been telling developers not to use Ctrl-A through Ctrl-Z in their user interfaces. Ctrl was next to A on the original IBM Personal Computer, the PC XT, and the original PC AT; IBM moved it to the far corners of the keyboard in 1986. Not one of the keystrokes Ctrl-A through Ctrl-Z was used for any function in any program bundled with Microsoft Windows from 1985 to 1992. Only one of those keystrokes had a documented word-processing command function in WordPerfect for MS/PC DOS. Only one worked in Microsoft Word for MS/PC DOS. Those keystrokes could be used only for input of non-ASCII printing characters in MultiMate and the cc:Mail message editor. Only the few that worked on the CP/M command line worked on MS/PC DOS's command line and (except for the brief period when DR DOS was around) in the MS/PC DOS bundled utilities.

    Then, in 1992, when the monopoly was firmly established, a slew of Ctrl-plus-letter-key keystrokes were given prominent functions in Microsoft Windows.

    People like typing-zone command keystrokes a lot. The typing-zone command keystrokes Ctrl-A through Ctrl-Z are a platform-independent mechanism.

    The keyboard command sets of mass-market software tell quite a story. Anybody listening?

    Dan Strychalski ("dski") in Hsinchu

  151. Old keyboards rock... by esper_child · · Score: 1

    I really hate the trend that is going on today with making everything out of cheap plastic to save money and still charge about the same price for a cheaper product. I sit here still using the very same keyboard that came with my AT. In the past 15 years or so it is the only keyboard I have that has been able to survive more than 1 year of my abusive typing style (fast and hard). I am going to be so pissed when this thing finally breaks, as there is no place around here that carries keyboards like this.

    If someone can point me to where I can get quality spring-loaded keyboards that have a hard case on them I would really appriciate it. I would never want to give up my durable loud keyboard for a quiet flimsy one again (I have gone through quite a few of those when I was up on campus where people get pissed about the loud keyboards)

  152. Extra keys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The extra keys between the main keyboard area and the keypad are in the way and should be removed, or at least moved to the outer edge beyond the keypad. They duplicate funtionality already extant in the keypad since 1980 if not before, in a more difficult to use layout. (On the keypad, you can easily reach all the cursor movement keys without moving your hand. In the area to the left this is not the case.) Their only purpose is to increase the distance the hand must travel to get from the home position on the main area (for data entry) to the home position on the keypad (for navigation).
    Wrong. The extra keys you are referring to are needed because they free the user from having to consistantly toggle the NumLock button on the keypad whenever they go to use the Home, Insert, or other functions. That's why to this day, there are still hundreds of people who specifically turn off the NumLock function in their BIOS (if they know how, and I'm assuming you are one of them) because they learned keyboarding on the original 88 key XT keyboards and absolutely refuse to use the "extra" keys you refer to for their intended function. This is also why to this day, many motherboards (and Windows NT/2000/XP) recognize the CTRL-ALT-DEL sequence aditionally as CTRL-ALT-. when using the numeric keypad because the period key is the DEL key when NumLock is off.

    Bottom line: It's easier for the 98+% of computer users to leave the NumLock function on and use both the "extra" keys and the numeric keys for the functions as printed on their keycaps.
  153. For the other view by hayden · · Score: 2
    Read the parent (for some reason posted as an AC). Basically the web page referenced by the article is crap and well and truely rubbished by the link in the parent (Reposted here for the lazy).

    http://www.mwbrooks.com/dvorak/dissent.html

    As a Dvorak user for 4ish years now I've never seen anyone who learned the Dvorak keyboard go back to qwerty once they reached a decent speed. Also it impresses the hell out of the drones when they see you typing on a keyboard with different layout than the printed letters (just don't tell them that once you can touch type the printed letters are meaningless :)

    --
    Nerd: Derogatory term typically directed at anybody with a lower Slashdot ID than you.
  154. Easy method to determine keyboard quality by th3_l33t_h4x0r · · Score: 1

    An easy method to determine the quality of your keyboard. 1. Take the keyboard and remove the cable. Bonus points if the cable is designed to be replaceable. 2. Find and old CGA monitor. 3. Raise the keyboard high above your head. 4. Bring it down onto the monitor as if you were chopping wood. 5. Repeat until either the monitor or the keyboard breaks. If this test renders the keyboard useless, it's probably one of those wireless multimedia internet pieces of crud. If the keyboard miraculously survives and/or the monitor smashes to bits, congratulations! You have an IBM Model M!

  155. Is the Happy Hacking Keyboard a Buckling Spring? by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

    Thanks, I found out at work that current keyboards are just too big...I looked at Pfuca site...and man that keyboard is small. Especially since my fingers are not 'gracefully spider-like' and dance around the edges of my keyboard. Only thing is, before I shell out money, is the tactile feedback of a Buckling Spring type? Anyone? Please let me know...!

  156. Re:Is the Happy Hacking Keyboard a Buckling Spring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe it is still the membrane switch setup, but it has a much better feel than the usual crop of keyboards. It's pretty close, but still not the same, as the IBM keyboards. I have one of the "space saver" IBM boards and was hoping to save even more space - which it does - but I'm just not sure I like it enough. Although I'm giving it a good try, I've only had it about a month so far.

    I really like the small size - and having NO extra keys off to the side, it centers well on my lap when kicked back in the chair! - but oh, the feel of the IBM... The best way to characterize the difference, in my view, is while there's a bit of a "click" feeling for the HHKB, it has a higher resistance the whole way down. Whereas the IBM just drops on down once the initial "edge resistance" is breached.

    Now I have to decide whether to shell out for one for work... The most annoying side effect is since the backspace key is one row down, I now drive myself crazy when switching back and forth between keyboards!

  157. two halves, separable by liquidmarkets · · Score: 1

    I wish someone would make a keyboard with both halves completely separable and joined only by a cable. Then I could stretch my arms out occasionally and keep typing. Some keyboard do exist where the two halves are separated (usually with an inch or two of plastic not covered by keys in between), but not completely separable - I've never seen one where you put the left and right halves four feet apart, for example.

    --
    Sig: Free classified ads at
  158. Compaq 208-key by schroet · · Score: 1

    I am personally a big fan of the Compaq 208-key "double" keyboard. I really hate that shift key.

    http://www.bbspot.com/News/2001/08/keyboard.html

  159. Wrong! by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    Not true! You are wrong about Unicomp's keyboards. I own two boards bought from them. One is an old IBM model M (they used to have surplus inventory from IBM), and I also bought a new Unicomp keyboard. They sell two types of keyboards: buckling spring capacitive keyswitch and rubber dome keyswitch based keyboards. They call the former "buckling spring" keyboards and the latter "quiet touch" keyboards.

    Of course, the cool thing about the model M keyboards is that they are slightly heavier than the newer Unicomp buckling spring boards.

    The best thing about these boards is that they will nearly last a lifetime, and therefore you can get really used to one board, its shape, size, feel... makes for easier typing.

  160. Re:Buckling Spring, Capacitive Keyswitches Keyboar by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    I have a Unicomp trackpoint buckling spring keyboard. In fact, I am using it right now. My parent's are borrowing my old IBM type M. I love trackpoints, but I also have a traditional 3 button mouse, for gaming purposes. Yes, you can use both at the same time.

  161. Re:Happy Hacking Keyboard Review: Good for Sun Onl by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

    Check out this keyboard at pckeyboard.com's yahoo store. It's probably exactly what you're looking for (except for the size thing). I'm tempted to order one.

    Personally, I like the backspace key just above the enter key. It's less of a reach. And in Unix or Linux, \ isn't used nearly as much as it is in Windows. Unfortunately my fingers get confused when I go back and forth between my HHKB (or the Sun Type 6 UNIX layout USB keyboard I use at home these days) and a "normal" PC keyboard. It's also kind of weird to have `~ on the right hand side of the keyboard.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  162. rubber keyboards by dotmaudot · · Score: 1

    You Americans never saw Sinclair ZX80, obviously.

    This was a fine example of something quite completely unlike a keyboard...

    ciao, .mau.

  163. Re:Someone, mod the parent post to this one, +5 ! by Helen+O'Boyle · · Score: 1
    An easy method to determine the quality of your keyboard. 1. Take the keyboard and remove the cable. Bonus points if the cable is designed to be replaceable. 2. Find and old CGA monitor. 3. Raise the keyboard high above your head. 4. Bring it down onto the monitor as if you were chopping wood. 5. Repeat until either the monitor or the keyboard breaks. If this test renders the keyboard useless, it's probably one of those wireless multimedia internet pieces of crud. If the keyboard miraculously survives and/or the monitor smashes to bits, congratulations! You have an IBM Model M!

    Oh, I wish I had moderator access today and had not already contributed to this thread. That post is CLASSIC and its author deserves some karma.

    Somebody mod this guy up!!

  164. Re:QWERTY, Dvorak and left/right handedness by Helen+O'Boyle · · Score: 1

    Some years ago, I spent some time trying to learn the Dvorak, and finally gave up, annoyed at the productivity hit during the week.

    Then my thoughts turned to, WTF is this not working well for me, even after I've learned the positions of the keys pretty well?

    So, what's a geek to do? Well, of course, I started doing analyses of my keystrokes, to try to figure this out. ;-) What I found out was that when using QWERTY, my left hand was typically typing 55%+ of the letters, and the right 45%-, and when using Dvorak, it's reversed.

    I'm left-hand-dominant (though officially right-handed thanks to pre-school training). I want to use the fingers on my left hand as much as possible, because they're the ones that have the highest dex (obD reference). QWERTY lets me do that, so I decided then and there that QWERTY wins for me, and haven't bothered with the "efficiency" of Dvorak since then.

  165. Re:Anyone remember these? Yes - the A2000 KB ... by vortexau · · Score: 1

    Have to agree about the A2000 keyboard! Still using the original since 1991. Had one trip to Synapse (Brisbane IBM & Amiga RepairShop) to 'sort out' 3 sticking keys.
    (Really miss the home-position points on the C128D keyboard 'thou!)
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  166. Re:A Dvorak keyboard makes more sense now than bef by Sunnan · · Score: 1

    Samething goes for Apple's current keyboards, including the ones on their portables.

  167. Compaq by browman · · Score: 1

    Personally I have a soft spot for the bog standard Compaq keyboards (the ones they keep supplying with servers, but end up staying in the box). I personally think they have a fantastic feel to them, and the short key travel makes them really quick.

    I got one of those recent standard MS keyboards (the one with the Web and Calculator buttons along the top), and it felt terrible. Inconsistencies in the feel of certain keys, and so on.

    IMHO the old IBM Clicktastics are great... for about an hour of hard typing, then tendons start to complain.

    (PS: can anyone recommend a good USB keyboard, I broke my PS2 port being too fussy!!!)

    --
    You fool! You've given cheese to a lactose intolerant volcano god! Do you know what that means?
  168. Re:i don't think keyboards are your problem (OT) by lingqi · · Score: 1

    there is only one solution to your problem:

    step 1) obtain wireless access point
    step 2) amplify broadcast power of access point
    step 3) take computer to bathroom stall - buy some "caution / do not enter" tape"
    step 4) check connection (if no connection, redo step 2)
    step 5) work wonders to save humanity!
    (we all know that most of the truly inspiring thoughts come to man when he is in sitting on the throne -- just think about the flux capacitor)

    p.s. on a serious note: i am sorry for your current condition; maybe move to the states / even japan? (in japan, even the senior managers don't get office(s), so while it's the same lousy work env, you will at least feel better about it, maybe.)

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  169. Re:i don't think keyboards are your problem (OT) by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 1

    lol.

    I wish I could move to the US, for one thing, programmers salaries are somwhat higher! There's a small problems though of work permits, selling our house (which is tiny and not worth very much), we also have kids in senior school, and though I despise the quality of our public eductation, my American friends here in the UK (and I know a LOT of them, we're close to a US base) all tell me that the UK schools are MUCH better than US schools.

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  170. Re:i don't think keyboards are your problem (OT) by lingqi · · Score: 1

    i'd be much more worried about learning to drive on the opposite side of the road.

    i hear that when ppl learns to drive on one side -- in an emergency they automatically swerve to what they consider to be the "side of the road" -- in your case you will probabbly swerve left, which would be toward the oncomming traffic here in the US.

    and oh yeah -- if you ever do move here -- stay away from silicon valley, or california in general. this place is like the nymph in the legends -- lure you here with beautiful weather, and torment you for eternity with rediculous real-estate prices (houses are roughly 800k-1.4 million US dollars here, apt / townhouse (flat?) will cost you 350-600k US dollars) *coughs blood*

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  171. Re:Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix User by crumley · · Score: 2
    Uhm, your history is pretty funky.
    Not one of the keystrokes Ctrl-A through Ctrl-Z was used for any function in any program bundled with Microsoft Windows from 1985 to 1992.
    and
    Then, in 1992, when the monopoly was firmly established, a slew of Ctrl-plus-letter-key keystrokes were given prominent functions in Microsoft Windows.
    Windows was not a monopoly in 1992. 1992 was the year that Windows 3.1 was released and 3.0 was released in 1990. Windows 3.0 was the first version of Windows that was really useable, and Windows 3.1 was the first version that was really popular. In 1992, DOS was still more popular than Windows, so Windows was definitely not a monopoly.

    Besides which, I am sure that the reason that IBM included control keys on its keyboards is because they were standard in the mainframe and Unix world. The fact that they weren't used directly in DOS programs doesn't really prove anything.

    --
    Preventive War is like committing suicide for fear of death. - Otto Von Bismarck
  172. Re:Is the Happy Hacking Keyboard a Buckling Spring by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

    I'm lucky; I just went to ebay and picked up two(both for home & work)IMB model-m keyboards. The reason I want the buckling spring is a) I like the tactile feedback and b) what u said "IBM just drops on down once the initial edge resistance is breached"--easier to press for my weak pinky fingers.

  173. Re:Apple Laptop Keyboards Unsuitable for Unix User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Uhm, your history is pretty funky.

    My "funky" dates agree completely with yours.

    Windows was not a monopoly in 1992. 1992 was the year that Windows 3.1 was released and 3.0 was released in 1990. Windows 3.0 was the first version of Windows that was really useable, and Windows 3.1 was the first version that was really popular. In 1992, DOS was still more popular than Windows, so Windows was definitely not a monopoly.

    Please explain how "DOS" and the company that produced it constituted a competitive threat to "Windows" and the company that produced it.

    Microsoft has had monopoly power over the x86 platform since 1981. Mitch Kapor compared them to Standard Oil in 1986. They were under investigation and being talked about as a monopoly in 1990.

    "DOS" apps brought in more cash than "Windows" apps in 1992, but that would end in 1993, and Microsoft was watching the figures. They had the market in their pocket, and they knew it. The monopoly was a sure thing, if not "firmly established" in your view.

    Besides which, I am sure that the reason that IBM included control keys on its keyboards is because they were standard in the mainframe and Unix world.

    So where's the Meta key on the IBM Personal Computer?

    Ctrl was standard before Unix came into being. It was standard on every Teletype and CRT terminal from the late sixties on. It was standard on the Apple II, every CP/M machine, every Amiga. An ASCII-speaking machine without Ctrl is useless for many important jobs. IBM included Ctrl because the 5150 was an ASCII-speaking machine. I can't think of a serious ASCII-speaking machine other than the early Macs that doesn't have Ctrl.

    The fact that they weren't used directly in DOS programs doesn't really prove anything.

    Ctrl-A through Ctrl-Z were used in extremely popular early "DOS" programs. WordStar was #1 in retail sales at least until the mid eighties and standard on campuses until the late eighties. It was in the programs that got sold into large corporate and governmental accounts from the early eighties on that Ctrl-A through Ctrl-Z were either totally unused or used exactly as all relevant standards expressly prohibit, that is, for input of printable characters. And you'll notice that WordPerfect for MS/PC DOS didn't use Alt-plus-letter-key combinations, either. In the software that served as millions of people's introduction to computers, not one typing-zone command keystroke existed. This is not significant? I take it you haven't yet heard of a manner of investigating that we call "science"....