Slashdot Mirror


Massive Two Towers Battle

ShadowLight writes ""In December vast hordes of eager filmgoers will mob cineplexes across the land and witness, at the climax of The Two Towers, one of the most anticipated scenes in recent movie history: the great Battle of Helm's Deep." This article talks about the software, named Massive, used to create this 50,000 creature battle."

214 of 544 comments (clear)

  1. The AI used by Damion · · Score: 5, Funny

    The way I heard that the AI for the battle scene was programmed was such that every one of the creatures had a slightly different set of paramaters, with the same goal of maximizing damage, while minimizing casualties.
    On the first run, every single one of the thousands of little AIs decided that the best way to minimize casualties was to turn and run away.

    --
    Common sense is what tells you the world is flat.
    1. Re:The AI used by duckpoopy · · Score: 5, Funny

      "The only way to win is not to play." -WOPR, 1982

      --
      word.
    2. Re:The AI used by lawndart · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually one of the guys from Massive gave a talk at my lab and they had video of it. All the little dudes in back rows turned and ran away. Evidently their software agents couldn't see any of the enemy agents so they ran around trying to find some!

    3. Re:The AI used by br0ck · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've heard an exaggeration from the previous SlashDot article.

      In another early simulation, Jackson and Regelous watched as several thousand characters fought like hell while, in the background, a small contingent of combatants seemed to think better of it and ran away. They weren't programmed to do this. It just happened. 'It was spooky.' Jackson said in an interview last year.

    4. Re:The AI used by pyros · · Score: 3, Funny

      I like the helicopter flight sim demo in australia where the kangaroo AI's were modeled too closely to people. They scattered, regrouped, and launched a surface-to-air strike taking down the chopper. Sorry I don't have a link, but I did actually read it from some news site or magazine, like Info World or something.

    5. Re:The AI used by Verne · · Score: 5, Funny

      I got it in email as follows:

      The reuse of some object-oriented code has caused tactical
      headaches for Australia's armed forces. As virtual reality
      simulators assume larger roles in helicopter combat training,
      programmers have gone to great lengths to increase the
      realism of their scenarios, including detailed landscapes and,
      in the case of the Northern Territory's Operation Phoenix,
      herds of kangaroos (since disturbed animals might well give
      away a helicopter's position).

      The head of the Defence Science & Technology Organization's
      Land Operations/Simulation division reportedly instructed
      developers to model the local marsupials' movements and
      reactions to helicopters.

      Being efficient programmers, they just re-appropriated some
      code originally used to model infantry detachment reactions
      under the same stimuli, changed the mapped icon from a
      soldier to a kangaroo, and increased the figures' speed of
      movement.

      Eager to demonstrate their flying skills for some visiting
      American pilots, the hotshot Aussies "buzzed" the virtual
      kangaroos in low flight during a simulation. The kangaroos
      scattered, as predicted, and the visiting Americans nodded
      appreciatively... then did a double-take as the kangaroos
      reappeared from behind a hill and launched a barrage of
      Stinger missiles at the hapless helicopter. (Apparently the
      programmers had forgotten to remove that part of the
      infantry coding.)

      The lesson? Objects are defined with certain attributes,
      and any new object defined in terms of an old one inherits
      all the attributes. The embarrassed programmers had learned
      to be careful when reusing object-oriented code, and the
      Yanks left with a newfound respect for Australian wildlife.

      Simulator supervisors report that pilots from that point
      onward have strictly avoided kangaroos, just as they were
      meant to.

      From June 15, 1999 Defence Science and Technology Organization
      Lecture Series, Melbourne, Australia, and staff reports


      Right, now hit me with the karma baby!

      --


      There are only two things in this world that smell like fish. And one of them's fish...
    6. Re:The AI used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The actual quote is:
      "Strange game. The only winning move is not to play."

    7. Re:The AI used by TheGrimace · · Score: 5, Informative

      Only somewhat true. Check out snopes for a more accurate (although less humourous) rendition and the true origins of this not quite urban legend.

    8. Re:The AI used by child_of_mercy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually Wellington once observed that the French infantry columns broke from the rear, that is it wasn't the guys at the front taking the damage who ran away, it was the guys getting nervous at the back who couldn't take it, and as they ran more guys would take the hint and bail.

      it sounds like the AI were arriving at a similar conclusion.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    9. Re:The AI used by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


      watched as several thousand characters fought like hell while, in the background, a small contingent of combatants seemed to think better of it and ran away

      Those characters had the AI modelled after French soldiers. You do know why the streets of Paris are lined with trees, yes? Because the Germans like to march in the shade.

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    10. Re:The AI used by BubbaTheBarbarian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dear /.,
      AI orcs?! We Surrender!!!!!
      -France

    11. Re:The AI used by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 2

      Well, there was that whole capitulating right at the start of WWII thing... ;)

      I'm just kidding, mostly... there were a sizable number of Free French who escaped and returned to fight another day. But I think that this is where the modern conception of the French as cowards comes from. Although they fought very valiantly during the opening rounds of the Battle of France, the early capitulation and subsequent refusals to cooperate with Allied efforts (not that they weren't in a bad spot, but still, actively resisting the North African invasion was a bit much), contrasted especially to Britain's spirited resistance with far fewer resources, didn't leave the country in a very favorable light.

      That would be my guess, anyway...

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
  2. BFD. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny
    I have this awesome rendering package called B.R.A.I.N... When I read the book, it made this breathtaking scene with over 100,000 monsters...

    And the coolest thing about it is that I did it 3 years ago when I actually read the book.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:BFD. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have this awesome rendering package called B.R.A.I.N...

      I tried that technique too, but after 200 pages of Frodo and his buddies wandering through the woods and talking about mushrooms, my B.R.A.I.N. made me throw the fucking thing across the room.

      Maybe I'm just a low-brow or something, but I tend to prefer books where things happen.

      --

      I write in my journal
    2. Re:BFD. by captaincucumber · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you need to install a plugin package called P.A.T.I.E.N.C.E.

    3. Re:BFD. by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Personally, I hated the book the first time I read it. Unlike The Hobbit, which is filled with action and adventure, the vast majority of Lord of the Rings consists of traveling to somewhere where something might happen, and having a sense of dread and foreboding about it. When I read it the second time, I knew that nothing was going to happen for long stretches of the book, so I was able to have greater patience with the whole thing, and get more out of it. Although I still found the endless talk of destiny and family trees and Elven racial superiority to be extremely tedious. (Incidentally, I'll be interested to see if the dark-complexioned evil men of Harad and their war elephants will show up in the next two movies.)

    4. Re:BFD. by JebusIsLord · · Score: 2

      The Hobbit was written for young children, i think he was hoping an older audience had more patience. Apparently he was wrong.

      --
      Jeremy
    5. Re:BFD. by rgoer · · Score: 2, Funny
      Blockquoth DarkHelmet:
      And the coolest thing about it is that I did it 3 years ago when I actually read the book.
      Sad thing about BRAIN, though, is that it apparently hasn't made much improvement over the years (even though it has been in a constant state of development); I ran this same test, rendering the battle at Helm's Deep, some decades past and got very similar results to those you achieved just three years ago.
    6. Re:BFD. by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, I was like 12 when I read it the first time. Do people lurk on this board waiting for the opportunity to lash out and prove their intellectual superiority?

    7. Re:BFD. by daeley · · Score: 2

      BFD.
      by DarkHelmet


      Awww, you're just jealous since SpaceBalls 2 never got made. ;)

      Dark Helmet: What's the matter, Colonel Sandurz? CHICKEN???

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    8. Re:BFD. by mekkab · · Score: 5, Funny

      yes.

      P.S.- my wife just read the trilogy in a day or two.

      I asked "How?!"

      She replied "Oh, I skipped all that stupid singing crap. Man! They sing abou everything!"

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    9. Re:BFD. by EvilAlien · · Score: 5, Funny
      "Do people lurk on this board waiting for the opportunity to lash out and prove their intellectual superiority?"

      <whisper>
      Did you just figure that out??

      Sure, they decided to use "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." instead of "We're smarter than you. Suck it." like originally planned, but the result has been the same. </whisper>

      Anyways, I'm really trying hard not to get too excited about little AI warriors each making their own combat decisions on screen. I'm really trying hard not to think about this. I tell myself, repeatedly, that getting excited about artificial intelligence is normal.

      I think I need to shower.

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    10. Re:BFD. by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 4, Funny

      I prefer to just link the reading routines to libskimmer.so. If nothing's happening, flip ahead a few (2-3) pages. If people are swinging swords or some important-sounding exchange is going on, flip back and read the intervening pages. If not, set mypage=thispage, and recurse. If Tom Bombadil is singing or if someone is explaining elven family structures, skip the whole damn chapter.

      (ob-herasy)It works well on the Old Testament, too!(*lightning bolt*)

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
    11. Re:BFD. by chabotc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well i think you sumerised the feeling that the book was supposed to replay quite well. A large part of the book is about man's journey towards death .. "dread and foreboding"

      It is also definatly true the book is very much about the characters development, and not the modern heroism that most current books seem to aspire to.

    12. Re:BFD. by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, my implementation of B.R.A.I.N. keeps complaining about someone / something called Pinky and how stupid he/it is.

      /me shrugs

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    13. Re:BFD. by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 3, Funny

      But, if the journey hadn't been so damned long, maybe Frodo could have cast the Ring away, without losing a finger.

      Just writing that reminds me how many miles I have walked around malls with the wife, when we only went there to get one thing. By the end, I'm delusional too.

    14. Re:BFD. by EuroChild · · Score: 4, Funny

      After months of trying to get my brother to read LotR he finally started and sent me this email which sums up Fellowship pretty well:

      Very different to the movie isn't it? Lots of unecessary, and not very interesting detail. He likes to take his time, old JRRT. You know: they travelled along the creek before reaching an outcrop of green grass, which in turn lead to a valley of birches. Passing through them, they noticed a green mound upon which was some moss which has nothing to do with the story, nor does the ridge they then decided to walk across. The oak lined track they followed for several hours is also irrelivant, but it can be seen in a map in the back of the book. "Would you like me to carry that pack for you sir?" Sam asked Frodo obediently. "No thankyou Sam. Sit boy. Good Hobbit!" Frodo replied.

      --
      Does this make my brain look big?
    15. Re:BFD. by Col.+Panic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Very different to the movie isn't it? Lots of unecessary, and not very interesting detail.

      Yes, unlike film, books must convey ideas that stimulate all the senses in simple print. Authors strive to describe sights, sounds and scents using nothing more than pen and paper. Some readers relish such writing and pore over the pages word-by-word. Others just want to get to the action. To each their own.

    16. Re:BFD. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Makes no difference if you read that or not, because the New Testament is a revamp of it. Alot like knowing C, then trying to learn C++

      Hmm. Methinks maybe you haven't read your Bible. It's more like knowing C, then trying to learn cross-country skiing.

      --

      I write in my journal
    17. Re:BFD. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

      Dude, I was like 12 when I read it the first time. Do people lurk on this board waiting for the opportunity to lash out and prove their intellectual superiority?

      Hah! I read it when I was 9! Now I'm intellectually superior! ;)

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    18. Re:BFD. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Offtopic
      Not like anyone's gonna care but I can read the trilogy in two days myself. I've done it in both paperback and PDF (obviously I'm used to being in front of the PC for long stretches, ha ha.) When I was in elementary they put me on a speed reading machine (as part of my GATE experience), and I'm sure they thought they were doing me a favor but they made a criminal of me.

      See, I can't afford to buy books considering the speed at which I read them... thank god for USENET!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:BFD. by Scooter · · Score: 2

      "There are no matte lines in your imagination." - G. Lucas

    20. Re:BFD. by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      It is also definatly true the book is very much about the characters development, and not the modern heroism that most current books seem to aspire to.

      Character development? What character development? Every character in the books acts and talks in exactly the same way. The hobbits, in particular, are completely interchangeable.

      At least in the movie they chose to have Pippin played by a Scottish actor. If they hadn't, it would be completely impossible to tell them apart. Hell, they could have made a running gag out of it.

      "Well, I guess this is the end, Merry."

      "I'm Pippin. He's Merry."

      "Whatever. Just tell Merry I said bye."

      --

      I write in my journal
    21. Re:BFD. by captaincucumber · · Score: 2, Funny

      A better comparison is C to Java. In the old testament you had to be careful about garbage pointers and deallocating memory and platform interoperability and committing various other sins, but in the Java you just give your sins over to Jesus and all will be forgiven.

  3. Anticipation by GeckoFood · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...this 50,000 creature battle...

    This is sure to be a big box office draw, but 50,000 scantily-clad beach bimbo babes might do even better at the box office!

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
  4. I hope they have some interesting features on the Two Towers DVD(s) related to MASSIVE. There was a bit on the Special Edition DVD of the Fellowship of the Ring, but not as much as I would've liked.

  5. From the article by SuperMario666 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Return of the King, the final film in the Lord of the Rings trilogy, the climactic battle--yes, the Battle of Helm's Deep is just a run-up--is rumored to employ more than 100,000 characters.

    Oh Hell Yes.

    I can't be the only geek with a hard-on here can I?

    1. Re:From the article by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh Hell Yes.

      I can't be the only geek with a hard-on here can I?


      um... yeah, you can be.
    2. Re:From the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      I can't be the only geek with a hard-on here can I?

      Nope. I've got a half-dozen Mozilla tabs browsing autopr0n right now. :)

  6. Re:I only hope..... by lvdrproject · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Name an instance where a converted-from-the-novel movie was accurate, please. I've been watching movies my whole life, and i've yet to see one. As for LOTR, it was more accurate than most novels-to-movies i've seen.

    :Lav

  7. anticipated? by ArmorFiend · · Score: 3, Interesting
    one of the most anticipated scenes in recent movie history: the great Battle of Helm's Deep.

    Uh, what kind of monkey anticipates this battle? It's hardly ranks among the many battles in Return of the King. And at the end of the day there's plenty of similar stuff out there: braveheart, Ben Hur, yadda yadda yadda. Please spin down the hype reflex.

    1. Re:anticipated? by jgalun · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, I am very much anticipating the Battle of Helm's Deep. Let me give you my good reason, and then my bad reason.

      The good reason is that, if I recall correctly (and I'm not positive I do), the three major battles in the Lord of the Rings are different: the Battle of Helm's Deep is about holding on with no reinforcements coming, the battle at Minas Tirith is heavy on Nazgul and is about holding out til reinforcements come, and the final battle is about dying valiantly in an effort to delay Sauron until Frodo can destroy the ring. So they do have different feels.

      Anyway, the bad reason for why I am looking forward to the Battle of Helm's Deep is that I didn't really like the first LoTR movie that much. I was a huge fan of the books when I was younger (I read them, and the Silmarillion, dozens of times), but I felt that the movie lacked the sense of mystery and sadness (at the passing of the great ages of magic and elves) that the books had. To me, the magic of the written word could not be translated into the screen. I could imagine Gandalf somehow becoming more imposing, but seeing it in the movie seemed like a parlor trick rather than magic. Similarly, I could imagine Galadriel being somehow different and magical, but seeing her with a glow about her is just...too straightforward.

      That being said, the one thing I loved about the movie was how beautiful it was. The scenes in that movie were astounding. And that's why I'm looking forward to the Battle of Helm's Deep. :)

    2. Re:anticipated? by wnknisely · · Score: 2

      I was a huge fan of the books when I was younger (I read them, and the Silmarillion, dozens of times), but I felt that the movie lacked the sense of mystery and sadness (at the passing of the great ages of magic and elves) that the books had. To me, the magic of the written word could not be translated into the screen.

      I don't know if you've seen the extended version of the movie yet or not - but if you haven't go and do so. I found that the longer version fixed most of the rough spots of the studio release version and added enough atmosphere that I really felt I had seen Middle Earth at the turn of the age.

      Many, many kudos to Jackson for an extraordinary bit of work. It's a true pity that the longer version wasn't the studio release version - it's truly a masterpiece.

      --
      In illa quae ultra sunt
    3. Re:anticipated? by Soulslayer · · Score: 2

      I agree.

      LOTR:FOTR Sepcial Edition is to LOTR:FOTR Theatrical

      as

      The Abyss Special Edition is to The Abyss Theatrical

      In other words, the entire feel of the film changes and the characters are much more enaging. The Special Edition puts back in all the character development and haunting sorrow missing from the Theatrical Edition. It also gives us much needed downtime between the action sequences and smooths out the pacing. The repair of the pacing issue (something that bothered me in the theater particularly since Jackson had proved he was a master of pacing with The Frighteners) also corrects the impression of too much land traveled in too short a time. The days, weeks, and months that pass between certain events are more readily apparent now.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    4. Re:anticipated? by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      i must agree too.

      only thing bothering me now is that instead of seeing the theatre vers. of two towers, i would much rather see the extended version of that straight away..

      though.. in my feelings, you could twist the two towers to theatre length better than fotr(simply because it's more fast paced imho, and theres less explaining to do, more just theatrical showings of courage &etc).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  8. Calling Dr. Freud by kitzilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    The "Two Towers." Now a software program called "Massive." No trend here.

    My Vorpal Sword is bigger than yours.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    1. Re:Calling Dr. Freud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's a keen insight of yours, because I heard that the original, working title for the series was Lord of the Cock Ring

    2. Re:Calling Dr. Freud by anzha · · Score: 2

      My Vorpal Sword is bigger than yours.

      Aw. How cute. Munckinism Lives...

      --
      Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
  9. Re:Peter Jackson You Rock! by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Just after the four Hobbits get past the watchman in Bree, on their way to the Pracing Pony, Peter Jackson appears on the right hand side of the screen, and announces his presence with a lovely belch.

  10. Notice the closing comment. by Prince_Ali · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dan Koeppel, a film-school dropout, has written for Wired and The New York Times Magazine. Although a longtime Tolkien reader, he draws the line at The Silmarillion.

    Wuss.

    1. Re:Notice the closing comment. by David+Gould · · Score: 3, Funny


      Reading The Silmarillion and The Book of Lost Tales was great! For the better part of a year, my insomnia was cured -- whenever I would have trouble sleeping, I'd try to slog through the next three or four pages and it would knock me out like a hammer to the head. I can't tell you how often I've wished for such a soporific book since finishing those, but nothing else that I've found comes close.

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    2. Re:Notice the closing comment. by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      It wasn't as much of a plotted story as a narrative. Kinda a then this happened and this and this, and this person was known by these 20 names.

      If you like Lord of the Rings, this is basically the back story - how the world got the way it was in LotR.

      Much as WWI is the way the world got setup for WWII, this has what brought Sauron to power.

  11. I don't know why anyone by dubbayu_d_40 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    would care what effects are in movies anymore. They can do anything, they have BIG computers.


    This is a good thing. The last Star Wars finially convinced me that Lucas is a POS because I wasn't distracted by his "special effects."


    Hopefully effects will now be more relevant to the story if we are taking cgi for granted.


    My guess is TTT can hold it's own without the gee whiz cgi.

    1. Re:I don't know why anyone by Patik · · Score: 3, Informative
      They can do anything, they have BIG computers.
      They have effects that fit seamlessly into the video? They have entire films of CG humans that are indistinguishable from real humans?

      Sorry, but I think they've got a ways to go, and I'm really interested to see what these movies can do to raise the bar.

    2. Re:I don't know why anyone by Soko · · Score: 2

      This is a good thing. The last Star Wars finially convinced me that Lucas is a POS because I wasn't distracted by his "special effects."

      POS being "Point Of Sale", of course, IMHO. ;-)

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    3. Re:I don't know why anyone by fferreres · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And sometimes, too pretty = too fake. I don't know, but the original Millenium Falcon looks to me more real than the shiny silver plane in the new series or the "parachute" weasel.

      The SW story in the original SW was not *that* much innovative, but it was beautifully narrated, well acted and at times hilariuos (not perfect, but the guys looked like they actually where there and alive, real people not script-followers). The plot had many unexpected clever twists also.

      It was not so much the special effects. They added ambience, but the story could have been placed in the past or even further in the future and still be a classic.

      The new saga well, I can't criticize part by part, I just didn't feel anything at all, the characters felt like reading a stupid script ("I MUST do this, it's in the script!!").

      E.2 was a bit better (compared to the boredness that E.1 provided me). The only guy that felt slightly real was the fallen Jedi (which didn't even look like a bad guy at all) and the cloning aliens.

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    4. Re:I don't know why anyone by dr00g911 · · Score: 2

      BIG computers != talented VFX artists.

      Check out the latest Bond film for one hell of a lot of God-awful effects. I mean jarring, mouth-gapingly bad effects.

      God-awful acting, plot, direction, editing and music, too, for what it's worth :-)

      And not even a REAL half-naked woman in the title squence (all CG)? I'm struggling to find anything redeeming about it at all? John Cleese? Hally Barry's T&A?

      Quality filmmaking isn't about the effects, anyhow. If it were, Episodes I and II wouldn't have been the complete piles of steaming excrement they were. (For the record: Warcraft III's cutscenes were better).

      Remember, kids: it's not the size of your pencil -- it's how you write your name.

  12. Re:I only hope..... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Funny

    The dead orc still looks up when steped on.

    Who says he's dead? He's just disabled and bleeding to death.

    The arrow counts are still way off.

    If you're talking about what I think you're talking about, even the book says that Legolas picked up orc and goblin arrows along the way. Besides, if you sat through the movie counting the arrows, I think it's possible that you might have missed the point.

    The size of the hobbits still keeps changing.

    Yeah, and in episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a (heh heh) magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.

    Of course it seems I'm a troll for even thinking that there could be anything wrong with these movies.

    Hee hee. I get it! Lord of the Rings! Troll! Brilliant!

    (-1, Hobbit)

    --

    I write in my journal
  13. Random sequences + Beowulf requirement ;-p by saitoh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, to get it out of the way before someone else does;
    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these ;-p

    but besides that point, on the second page, about half way down, they talk about how nobody really knew what was going to happen when "orc met elf" par say, so they just let it randomly play out. Friggin neat IMHO. So in theory, they could throw extra renders on of different battles for special edition dvds and such.... Imagine the posibilities (while you imagine a beowulf cluster of these).

    Saitoh

    --
    We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
  14. MASSIVE Hordes of Slashdot Readers Ecstatic by dmccarty · · Score: 3, Funny

    In a momentous surge of self-denial, Timothy was able to restrain himself for a full 20 days before posting a repeat story about The Two Towers. Slashdot readers, rejoice!

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  15. NEW CATEGORY by Viking+Coder · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about a new category? "Movie SPOILERS". That way, I can filter out articles on it, so I don't have to accidentally read about "the most anticipated scene" in a movie that's not out yet, just in case I've been working very hard to NOT see anything about the movie, so that I can fully enjoy it when it finally DOES come out?

    Damnit.

    Oh by the way:
    It's a sled.
    They drive off the cliff.
    It's a guy.
    Rose lives, Jack dies.
    He's dead.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
    1. Re:NEW CATEGORY by joshki · · Score: 2

      Umm.... the book was published in the mid 1950's. It's not like this is news. Most people already know the whole story -- even the few around here who aren't Tolkien fans. I read them when I was 12 (Including the silmarillion -- unlike the author of the article).

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
    2. Re:NEW CATEGORY by bugnuts · · Score: 5, Funny

      Argh, there are TOWERS in this?

      Thanks for ruining the movie. :)

    3. Re:NEW CATEGORY by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, I heard that since Tolkein died there won't be a third book in the Trilogy. Whaaa! Now I'll never find out if Frodo and Sam made it to Mordor!!!

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    4. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      I haven't read the books in 15 years. I've read a bunch of sci-fi/fantasy in the meantime, so it's fairly easy to not THINK about Lord of the Rings, so I don't ruin it for myself.

      [W]hy not just filter out the Movies topic?

      Because I like movie retrospectives (how they animated Final Fantasy, etc.), and I like being informed about new movies coming out that I might not have already heard about. But I detest movie spoilers so much so that I can't watch trailers at all - they show far too much, and I guess my visual memory is far too good. I end up anticipating every scene I've already seen.

      I'm not really that pissed about this specific event, but I would appreciate some consideration on this point in the future.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    5. Re:NEW CATEGORY by halftrack · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're on /. and haven't read LOTR??

      Watch out, /.'s infiltrated, the enemy agents are in.

      --
      Look a monkey!
    6. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      I bet I could spoil Ender's Game pretty quick - and I bet some people would get pretty pissed.

      Like I said, I'm not complaining about this specific incident - but in general a "spoilers" category, or at least warning, doesn't hurt anyone, and it could certainly make ME happy.

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
    7. Re:NEW CATEGORY by Herkum01 · · Score: 2

      The script has been out for around 80 years, and he is complaining about Slashdot ruining the suprise for him?

      I wonder if he gets mad at George Lucas for not releasing the movies in order, so we already know that Anakin Skywalker is Luke's father *OOPS*, sorry about that.

    8. Re:NEW CATEGORY by xigxag · · Score: 5, Funny

      Aw fuck, all that moderation I just did, down the drain. But what the hell...

      You're on /. and haven't read LOTR??

      Translation:

      You're on /. and you're not a VIRGIN??

      And the inevitable follow-up:

      Er, wot's that? I've read LOTR twenty-eight times, that once every year since my 12th birthday, and I'm certainly no virgin...I've gotten laid twice in fact...once by a hot "Ensign Ro" bird at a Trek convo, another time by an "Akane" at a cosplay...what's so funny?...no I'm not really British, I just say "wot" and "bird" and "convo" naturally...cheers!

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  16. Please let this not suck by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I cringed during the CGI sequences of "Attack of the Clones." I really liked Lord of the Rings. Please let this new scene be a breakthrough and not an embarrasing distraction.

    1. Re:Please let this not suck by selectspec · · Score: 2

      Golem looked a little jarjar like. I'm worried.

      --

      Someone you trust is one of us.

    2. Re:Please let this not suck by L0rdJedi · · Score: 2

      He may look a little like him, but he definitely won't ACT like him. JarJar is an annoying turd that needs to go away. Gollum is a creature you're supposed to take pity on because of what he's become. I think Gollum would kick JarJar's ass any day.

      "Mesa JarJar Binks!"
      "You've got the ring! It's mine give it to me!"
      "But mesa just..ack...acck!" (as Gollum wraps his dirty little hands around JarJars throat)

      "It's my preciousssss!"

  17. Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by Allen+Varney · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Two Towers Visual Companion, a movie tie-in, features a nice four-page foldout illustrating the battle's progress. (N.B. The book's foreword, by Viggo Mortensen (who played Aragorn), is worth a read. Maybe I'm a bigot, but I hadn't expected an actor's commentary to be so perceptive and nuanced.)

    1. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Maybe I'm a bigot, but I hadn't expected an actor's commentary to be so perceptive and nuanced.)


      Do yourself a favor and go buy the 4 disc version of FoTR. Find a time when you have 7 hours to spare and watch the last two discs. Viggo is "an old school actor, a gentleman" as some of the others refer to him. This is a guy that takes his craft very, very seriously. That guy impressed the hell outta me, moreso even than Ian McKellan or Christopher Lee. And that's saying quite a lot. He's intelligent, soft-spoken, and cares about what he does. When's the last time you saw an actor like that?

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    2. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And don't forget that he was called in when they were already shooting. The original actor was cast "too young". Which if my calculations are correct, Aragorn is supposed to be at least in his 50s - going on the basis of the Story of Arwen and Aragorn (in the appendix). After being in NZ for two days he had to shoot Weathertop.

      The originally cast actor (I refuse to name him - he appeared in Queen of the Damned if you must know) has said in an interview that Wellington is the arsehole of the world (No Karma for guessing where I am), but he says he's "not bitter."

      For those who haven't bought/watched the appendencies of the extended version: after talking on the phone to PJ, he wasn't sure about whether to do it or not, but his son Henry said something like "OMG, they want you to be Aragorn, and you're thinking about it???". Henry was also responsible for checking that Thror Oakenshield's map is still around for Gandalf to look at.

      --
      Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
    3. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by ChrisJones · · Score: 2

      I was immensely impressed by all of the main characters, they really did an excellent job, but viggo shines as the best of the pack. it's a pity there aren't more roles in hollywood that suit his skills.

      --
      Chris "Ng" Jones
      cmsj@tenshu.net
      www.tenshu.net
    4. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Which if my calculations are correct, Aragorn is supposed to be at least in his 50s - going on the basis of the Story of Arwen and Aragorn (in the appendix).

      Wasn't his overall lifespan pretty high, though, in true "heroic" fashion? I get 206 going by the dates in "The Complete Guide to Middle Earth". Also by the dates given there, he was 77 when he met Frodo and companions in the Prancing Pony.

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    5. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Interesting
      And don't forget that he was called in when they were already shooting. The original actor was cast "too young". Which if my calculations are correct, Aragorn is supposed to be at least in his 50s - going on the basis of the Story of Arwen and Aragorn (in the appendix). After being in NZ for two days he had to shoot Weathertop.


      Well, that's the official line, yes. I believe in reality it had rather more to do with the original actor blowing up mailboxes in the neighborhood in Wellington he was staying in.


      Jedidiah

    6. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by dr00g911 · · Score: 2

      I (just yesterday) got finished watching all seven hours of extras on the Extended DVD set (FOTR).

      I have to say, coming out of that, that I've got huge amounts of respect for the actors and production team.

      I've been on film shoots before, and I have to tell you guys that the amount of love and dedication to the craft and art displayed by these guys is really amazing. The stories about Mortensen actually treating his sword and armor as if they were real, and coming to grips with the character give the guy pretty high marks in my book. He's pretty eloquent and takes his art VERY seriously.

      I was particularly impressed with the actors' sequences. They really convinced me that they digested, understood and respected the material and their roles.

      Not to be a glaring commercial for the extended set, but if you're into the films or into the books or both, at least rent the set and watch for the amount of nuance, (mind-blowing) detail and love these guys put into these films. It's mind-boggling to me still, and let me enjoy the film from a much more intimate standpoint.

    7. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by rotenberry · · Score: 2, Funny

      "...said in an interview that Wellington is the arsehole of the world..."

      Then I guess he was just passing through.

    8. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure how old he got to... Normal humans could expect 120 barring violent death IIRC... the descendants of Numenor often lived even longer.

    9. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      Liv Tyler impressed me most- McKellan and Lee, well I knew they would do a good job. The new people, well I didn't have an idea what to expect, so I was pretty open to seeing horrible acting and equally open to seeing brilliant acting.

      But when I heard Liv Tyler was playing Arwen, I thought "well, Arwen was supposed to be the most beautiful woman in the world, so I guess they figured they needed a hot piece of ass for the role". But WOW. She actually pulled it off and I was thinking of her as Arwen, NOT as Liv Tyler.

    10. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      When you are truly commited to something, NOTHING can stop you.

    11. Re:Diagram of Helm's Deep battle by frankie · · Score: 2
      Aragorn is supposed to be at least in his 50s

      Shamelessly taking from Usenet research and Appendix B of Red Book:

      Aragorn was born in Third Age year 2931, and he meets Frodo at the Prancing Pony on September 29, 3018. He is therefore 88 years old, but as a true Numenorean he is still in the prime of his life. 60 years of wandering the wilderness will take some toll on your skin, though.

      King Elessar (Aragorn) gave up the ghost at the age of 210, by an act of will. His physique at that point was comparable to a modern man in his 60s.

  18. interesting by selectspec · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "...you can still usually tell when something is synthetic. But we'll soon be crossing over into a time where that's not possible."


    I think we're pretty close to this already. I remember watching the sept 11 planes hitting the towers and thinking it looked "fake" like a movie, simply because it was too incredible believe.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

    1. Re:interesting by Sebastopol · · Score: 2


      There were 24 CG scenes in Demi Moore's "Showgirls".

      CG appears in far more movies than you would ever expect.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    2. Re:interesting by RedWizzard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree. I noticed that a lot of the people who complained that the CG in Fellowship was bad were only complaining about the bits that had to be CG - the cave troll, gollum, the eagle. Most of the CG went completely unnoticed because it was so seamless and realistic.

    3. Re:interesting by blancolioni · · Score: 2

      But since I bothered posting this, can I ask which film you actually had in mind? I saw the latter (God it was bad) but not the former.

      The movie with CG shots is Showgirls.

      Striptease is horrible ... I couldn't watch the whole thing even though I'd, um, sent my brain on a little journey. Showgirls, on the other hand, is wildly underrated. I won't bother defending this, but it's nevertheless true.

      Anyway, the CG: little things like making the (water) fountains bigger. Touches that you wouldn't normally notice as CG. Apparently the male dancers were all playing it straight before the computers were called in.

    4. Re:interesting by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      You've still got to admit that, some of these CG bits are horrible...

      I am yet to see a movie where actual characters get on the back of a CG object - as happened with the cave-troll - which is the slightest bit realistic.

      There are bits that jar somewhat, sure. But you shouldn't judge the movie's effects as a whole on a handful of less than perfect shots. Shots which aren't that bad anyway. IMO people are not evaluating them objectively because when they see them their brains are telling them "that's CG" regardless of what their eyes tell them. Your complaint about the cave troll is a case in point - you clearly didn't know that the characters on the cave troll's back were also CG - so the movement is accurate as far as physics goes. You seem to be complaining about compositing that never happened. If the movement didn't look right in a live action shot it wouldn't bother you but since you know it is CG you blaim the effects.
      It is not very difficult to make realistically looking CG, as long as it isn't the center of attention. All of your examples are exactly that.
      So why has no one been complaining about the Nazgul's horses at the ford, or the tentacles of the Watcher, or the fellowship itself running across the Bridge (in in some of the shots on the stairs). All these things were the centre of attention and also CG yet most people didn't realise that and there have been few complaints.
  19. Re:I only hope..... by mrjive · · Score: 3, Informative

    FYI:

    This is the list of all the known inconsistencies in FotR. Some of them are actually quite simple and some are rather amusing.

    --
    If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. -George Carlin
  20. Re:I only hope..... by miu · · Score: 2, Funny
    I'll see your reference...

    Yeah, and in episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a (heh heh) magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.

    I'll field that one. Let me ask you a question. Why would a man whose shirt says "Genius at Work" spend all of his time watching a children's cartoon show?

    and up you one with...

    Now I'm not necessarily an-an aficionado necessarily of 'Lord of the Rings' but the elvish that was spoken at Imladris between Aragorn and Arwen Undomiel, the Evenstar of her people...?

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  21. From the article... by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 5, Funny
    Regelous' laptop still contains an early sequence in which a pair of fighters--an Orc and a human--began a strange dance borne of too-finely balanced combat and obstacle avoidance modules.

    This kind of reminds me of the middle-school "proms" we would have at graduation.

    --
    Forget the whales - save the babies.
  22. Re:Truely a victory of open source by raytracer · · Score: 2
    It is wonderful to see open source in an integral role in a popular movie such as this. This is just the beginning of the mainstreaming of open source, hopefully.

    Moviemaking at the scale of The Two Towers is unlikely to ever be mainstream.
  23. Ah, the "Python-Camelot" defense tactic... by Rai · · Score: 5, Funny

    RUNAWAY!!

  24. I felt nothing in the Ep 1 battle by bugnuts · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the star wars episode 1 big battle, it looked like a bunch of CGI fighting more CGI. Granted part were robots, but they all looked robotic. I felt nothing, and it was due to the obvious cgi and actions.

    Sounds like Massive may do it right, assuming the graphics and actions are both believable. This sounds to be quite promising!

    1. Re:I felt nothing in the Ep 1 battle by dswensen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In the star wars episode 1 big battle, it looked like a bunch of CGI fighting more CGI. Granted part were robots, but they all looked robotic. I felt nothing, and it was due to the obvious cgi and actions.

      Yeah, and in Empire Strikes Back all the AT-ATs look to me like models that are being clumsily animated with stop-motion, and Jabba looks like a puppet whose lips don't match the words, and there are big dark grey boxes aroung all the TIE fighters.

      But my imagination took up the slack. I don't know where the idea came from that CGI is somehow supposed to supplant the moviegoing imagination. I think, ironically, it's because the effects look very close to realistic, but not 100% indistinguishable. Perhaps if they looked worse, the audience's imagination could fill in the gaps, but I doubt that will work anymore -- the audience simply expects too much.

      No, the battle in Episode I is not easily mistaken for the "real" thing -- but it wouldn't have been any more convincing, IMHO, if it were a dozen guys running around in rubber Gungan suits as squibs go off all around. (Although it probably would have been funnier, at the very least.)

      So, no. CGI isn't perfect. Special effects have limitations. They always have. I don't know why, all of a sudden, they're expected not to.

  25. Yeah, still... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 5, Funny


    <HUMOR>
    We still need to get Jackson to rename the movie, because he's obviously trying to cash in on 9/11!
    </HUMOR>

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    1. Re:Yeah, still... by craenor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Personally...I think they should change the title, "Return of the King". It's an afront to Elvis, the King never died, he doesn't have to return.

    2. Re:Yeah, still... by fungus · · Score: 2

      I can't beleive 3598 signed that petition...

    3. Re:Yeah, still... by rmohr02 · · Score: 2

      Well, just think of the people that support this movement.

    4. Re:Yeah, still... by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      I think "Return of the King" refers to Georgw W. Bush. It's scheduled to open on December 2003, about the time Dubya pulls a Palpatine...

  26. Slower than Doom III by scotay · · Score: 5, Funny

    A 50,000 character particle system would run slower than Doom III!!!

    This Massive stuff will be slow on the fastest next-generation movie theater accelerators even with tons of memory.

    When the credits are rolling, the frame rates might be okay, but in the battle scene I bet they drop to around 24fps.

    1. Re:Slower than Doom III by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where's the mod for "Hook, Line, and Sinker"?

      --
      Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
    2. Re:Slower than Doom III by sean23007 · · Score: 2

      Dude, 24 fps kills. When they pan the screen across a lot of small things, my eyes pop out of my head, look me in the sockets, and ask "Why the hell couldn't they have chosen 30? It couldn't have been that much harder, and it's ever so much closer to the necessary 100 that keep us in there." I hate it when they do that.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    3. Re:Slower than Doom III by Scooter · · Score: 2

      Yeah and what if they had taken the AI from QIII?

      "Pete we've got problems with Massive - on that last take, Orc 5345 spontaneously aquired a rail gun and slayed 2000 Elves with one shot.. "

      That'll teach em to stand in a neat line :)

      "WTF are the elves doing?"
      "I believe they're camping the flag.."

      Orc 456: "I 0wn j00!"
      Legolas: "Lag! dammit!"

      Gandalf "Forget the damm ring - go for the quad!!"

      Jackson: "Ok you're fired - get me 50,000 scruffy looking dudes, pronto!"

    4. Re:Slower than Doom III by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Actually, here's a true story very similar to that.

      Mutant Marsupials Take Up Arms Against Australian Air Force

      The reuse of some object-oriented code has caused tactical headaches for Australia's armed forces. As virtual reality simulators assume larger roles in helicopter combat training , programmers have gone to great lengths to increase the realism of the their scenarios, including detailed landscapes and -- in the case of the Northern Territory's Operation Phoenix -- herds of kangaroos (since groups of disturbed animals might well give away a helicopters position).

      The head of the Defense Science and Technology Organization's Land Operations/Simulations division reportedly instructed developers to model the local marsupials' movements and reaction to helicopters.

      Being efficient programmers, they just re-appropriated some code originally used to model infantry detachments reactions under the same stimuli, changed the mapped icon from a soldier to a kangaroo, and increased the figures' speed of movement.

      Eager to demonstrate their flying skills for some visiting American pilots, the hotshot Aussies "buzzed" the virtual kangaroos in low flight during a simulation. The kangaroos scattered, as predicted, and the Americans nodded appreciatively . . . and then did a double-take as the kangaroos reappeared from behind a hill and launched a barrage of stinger missiles at the hapless helicopter. (Apparently the programmers had forgotten the remove "that" part of the infantry coding).

      The lesson? Objects are defined with certain attributes, and any new object defined in terms of the old one inherits all the attributes. The embarrassed programmers had learned to be careful when reusing object-oriented code, and the Yanks left with the utmost respect for the Australian wildlife.

      Simulator supervisors report that pilots from that point onwards have strictly avoided kangaroos, just as they were meant to.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  27. Particles Vs. Agents by _Sambo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We may witness the birth of Agent Smith's (of Matrix fame) Ancestors. Agents are nearly independent reactive creations, using Fuzzy Logic (not to be confused with Dubya's Fuzzy Numbers) to simulate reality... if the battle were a reality.

    Particle Technology such as that used in the Charge of the Huns in Disney's "Mulan" is now yesterday's fishwrapping-newspaper software, worthy of MST3K review.

  28. Re:I only hope..... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's like in Saving Private Ryan when the medic gets shot in the kidney and starts spurting strawberry syrup, when anyone who's looked into human anatomy could have told them what a kidney wound should look like. They just about killed what should have been a very good scene by not buying a .25$ thing of brown food coloring.

    Uh... the kidneys are positively packed full of arterial blood. When wounded in the kidney, one does, for all practical purposes, spew strawberry syrup. Arterial blood is a bright, almost improbable, red. Like stop-sign red, or fire-engine red.

    Girlfriend's a surgical resident. She brings home snapshots of her operations on the digital camera. When she did a trauma surgery rotation, one of the injuries she had to treat was a kidney lac. Strawberry syrup was everywhere.

    --

    I write in my journal
  29. I love this game by mekkab · · Score: 5, Informative

    okay, lesse,

    Citizen Cain,
    Thelma & Louis,
    Crying Game
    Titanic
    The sixth sense

    This game is GREAT!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:I love this game by Carmody · · Score: 2

      if you love this game, take the Andy spoiler quiz

      http://www.dougshaw.com/puzzles/spoilers.html

      --
      God is real unless declared integer
    2. Re:I love this game by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

      I thought I'd farm one out to the female crowd.

      Well, the female contingent.

      Okay, okay, the one female who reads Slashdot.

      Lou: "Do you hold a grudge against Montgomery Burns?"
      Moe: "No!" BZZZ
      "OK, maybe I did, but I didn't shot him!" DING!
      Lou: "Checks out chief. OK, sir, you're free to go."
      Moe: "Good, because I got a hot date tonight!" BZZZ
      "A date." BZZZ
      "Dinner with friend." BZZZ
      "Dinner alone." BZZZ
      "Watching TV alone." BZZZ
      "Alright, alright! I'm gunna sit at home and oggle the girls in the Victoria's Secret Catalog!" BZZZ
      "Sears catalog." DING
      "Now will you unhook this thing already! I don't desirve this shabby treatment!" BZZZ

      --
      Education is the silver bullet.
  30. The better point ... by pgrote · · Score: 2

    I think most people saw it and thought the same thing. I know when I saw it I thought of Die Hard for some reason right away. It was amazing.

    As time has passed I still fire up the video clips and am amazed that Hollywood has come so far. So far in that they could duplicate an effect like that without injuring anyone.

    And right there is the point. We've become so enamored with what movies can do and bring us that we're to the point where it does mimic real life. If you extrapolate that out to the fantasy environment we're seeing things that man hasn't seen in a long time or ever.

    For instance think of the work on Jurassic Park. We weren't around when the dinos were, but we have the best look at what they might have moved like. Amazing.

    I can't wait for the next generation of effects.

    1. Re:The better point ... by ZaMoose · · Score: 3

      Yeah, it was almost like some bad Jerry Bruckheimer movie, wasn't it?

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    2. Re:The better point ... by Soulslayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That issue of the Onion is one of the most amazing things I have ever seen in my entire life. I remember when it first came out.

      I mean yes, those guys have done a wonderful job of producing biting satire for years, but to tackle a subject that sensitive so soon after the event itself was something no one in their right minds would do. And yet The Onion managed to find small glimmers of dark dark humour in an otherwise depressing event while still paying great respect to those that lost their lives and not feeling like an attempt to wring attention out of a horrible event.

      Using humour to pay respect to a tragedy like Sept 11th is an enormous challenge. The Onion made it looks easy.

      I found this article in particular to be a perfect balance of the two: God Angrily Clarifies "Don't Kill" Rule.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
  31. Re:I can't wait for this! by prockcore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who needs Star Wars, real geeks know what they love! And it's not Luca, let me tell you!

    My name is Lucas.. I created Episode 4. I live upstairs from you. I think you worshipped me before.

  32. Re:I only hope..... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When the guy has three arrows left and he shots five times, I cry foul.

    Cry all you like. The underlying point of my previous post was that movies (and, by the same token, Itchy and Scratchy) are meant to be enjoyed. They're positively riddled with continuity errors as a result of the way they're made. So what?

    Here, just to really get you excited, I'll throw you a couple of bones. During Boromir's death scene, his right hand appears and disappears from Aragorn's left shoulder about a million times. Or how about the magic disappearing pony? Or the way Merry and Pippin keep changing places during the scene in the inn?

    None of these things detracts from the story, friend. Not a one of them. They're not important, they're not insightful; hell, they're not even really mistakes as much as they are harmless side-effects of the movie-making process.

    Oh, and whatever you do, stay away from the climactic scene of Return of the Jedi. The smudges on Vader's helmet will no doubt send you into a fit of apoplexy.

    --

    I write in my journal
  33. ...vast hordes... by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny
    vast hordes of eager filmgoers will mob cineplexes across the land...

    Forget your piddly 100K of Orcs. I can't wait to see the CGI scene showing that horde charging the theatres!!

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  34. A Bonk with the Clue-bat by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    RTFA. Massive isn't open-source and their is no mention of what hardware they used either.

    The software is running on a cluster of GNU/Linux boxes. That is what he is likely referring to, and while this article may make no reference to the operating system, device drivers, libraries, and compilers used both to compile Massive itself, and to support the cluster upon which its renders run, it is well documented in any number of places, findable by google, and such common knowledge by most who read slashdot that he probably didn't feel the need to elucidate further.

    The growth of GNU/Linux in Hollywood, the financial industry (in which I work), and any number of other areas of serious computational endeavor is indeed a very big victory for free software and open source, and a glaring black eye for the likes of Microsoft. One of free software's strongest advantages is the way it facilitates rapid development, maintenance, and long term stability of in-house software (by avoiding things like coerced upgrades, arbitrarilly moving API targets, shoddy infrastructure, poor security, and other such costly and detrimental things that Microsoft & Co. are so well known for).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:A Bonk with the Clue-bat by ender81b · · Score: 2

      I stand corrected still he should've at least mentioned that in his post rather than make a blatant "victory for open source" without explaining why exactly this would be/is a victory for open source.

  35. Re:I only hope..... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Informative

    My bad, the wound was to the liver, not the kidney. From what I've read and seen it should have been dark, almost black.

    You read wrong. Liver lacs are just like kidney lacs; they positively spew arterial blood, because of the dense vascularization of the organ. Now the liver produces bile, but it doesn't actually contain bile. Bile is held in the gall bladder, but only a very small quantity of it. And it's a pale, translucent green, not black at all.

    If you have a bowel perforation, it's possible for fecal matter to leak out into the belly, and from the belly out through an open wound or incision. But that's kinda... well, it looks kinda like tiny nuggets of mud embedded in blood or bile. It's not really black, either.

    Realistic depictions of serious injuries are really not that interesting to look at; everything is one color, the bright red of arterial blood, and one texture, the texture of raw meat.

    --

    I write in my journal
  36. Massive is now for sale on CD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    At only $50 it is a steal.
    Available for Mac OS X, Win32 and Linux.

    AA Batteries and Beowulf Cluster not provided.

  37. Re:Fuzzy Logic by dlakelan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look up info on Fuzzy expert systems.

    In general a fuzzy expert system has a slew of if-then rules.

    Each If-then rule has a condition that is expressed as a fuzzy membership function, and a consequent that is expressed as a fuzzy membership function.

    All the if-then rules are applied "in parallel" to produce a set of fuzzy output sets. These fuzzy output sets are combined in a process called defuzzification (there are many algorithms for this) to produce a definite action (ie. move forward).

    The very cool thing about fuzzy rules is that they are generally expressed in terms of linguistic statements that make sense, as in

    "if attacked then fight_back" and
    "if attacked_heavily then retreat".

    attacked, fight_back, attacked_heavily, and retreat are all "fuzzy sets" (usually represented as arrays).

    --
    ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) http://www.endpointcomputing.com a scientific approach to custom computing.
  38. Watch out for the cellphone user in TT though by chopkins1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I found it rather amusing that one of the quotes from this story says, "...keep an eye out for a background character in The Two Towers who, in the middle of the battle, seems to take a call on his cellphone."

    1. Re:Watch out for the cellphone user in TT though by Cinnibar+CP · · Score: 2

      I found it rather amusing that one of the quotes from this story says, "...keep an eye out for a background character in The Two Towers who, in the middle of the battle, seems to take a call on his cellphone."

      "Can you hear me now? .... Good, good..."

  39. Did You Feel Anything in LOTR FoTR? by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the star wars episode 1 big battle, it looked like a bunch of CGI fighting more CGI. Granted part were robots, but they all looked robotic. I felt nothing, and it was due to the obvious cgi and actions.

    Did you feel anything in the opening sequence of the Fellowship of the Ring, at the battle where Isildur cut the ring from Sauron's hand? If so, that would confirm your evaluation of massive (at least for yourself), and would quite frankly agree with mine.

    OTOH Star Wars I and II were without feeling for reasons having nothing to do with the quality of the computer animation and special effects, and everything to do with terrible writing, mediocre directing, and wooden delivery ... something I doubt any of the LOTR movies suffer from, but I digress. :-)

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Did You Feel Anything in LOTR FoTR? by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 2



      Haha, funny.

      Just for your information, it's Treebeard and he is an Ent.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  40. Waldo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The real question is, Where's Waldo?

  41. Re:I only hope..... by jmo_jon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Girlfriend's a surgical resident. She brings home snapshots of her operations on the digital camera.

    Sounds cozy. Do you watch them in front of an open fire drinking wine?

  42. Out of date already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been playing a game called "Medieval: Total war" and IT has thousands of combatants bashing each other with swords, in real-time, on a "simple" P4 laptop. Even though the game (cleverly) uses sprites, and the TTT render uses every 3d trick in the book, when I saw the LOTR:TTT trailer, I was surprised how under-impressed I felt. It is amazing that modern games can even come close to "feeling" like these scenes rendered at great cost and time. The game has the thrill of interaction,sure, but still amazing how it stole the awe of the TTT trailer for me!! Anyone else feel the same?

    BTW, I wonder how long before we are playing games that look as good as TTT render?

  43. warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look he by nebenfun · · Score: 5, Funny

    my friends,
    This is my last post of slashdot. After seeing this, I have decided that life is not worth living. I loved Star Trek and Tolkien and then this happened.
    Doing the real ctrl-alt-del,
    nbfn
    This is a real site...
    not goat stuff

  44. They've been waiting for the harware to catch up by Pac · · Score: 2

    I agree with you, I used the same package somewhere in between you two, and my son used it two years ago. Same results every time.

    I heard the problem they are having is that the new versions of their software does not run with the present hardware. They hope the Coming Singularity will solve the problem and allow the new version to be launched.

  45. Re:50,000? by Sloppy · · Score: 2

    I guess I need to reread it, but I always imagined the battles (both at Helms Deep and at Minas Tirith) as being a lot smaller than this. Anyone recall if JRRT actually mentioned numbers?

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  46. More information on WETA and their infrastructure by CrackHappy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here is an interesting article which addresses some of WETA's other issues in creating the film, and talks a little about their uses of Linux as their core OS.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
  47. To answer the question by friday2k · · Score: 5, Informative

    It runs on Irix and Massive is being ported to Linux. Quote: From the beginning of preproduction, Weta Digital has also used the IRIX OS-based Octane visual workstations to write extensions to Maya and create proprietary technology. This technology includes Massive, a custom-built crowd animation or "artificial ecology" system developed on IRIX and now ported to Linux that draws from a huge database of motion-capture data. (see here).

    1. Re:To answer the question by FreeUser · · Score: 2
      It runs on Irix, that is true. It also runs on GNU/Linux.

      "We're making pretty significant steps into Linux-based workstations. They now appear to be becoming stable enough to be a viable alternative in both the 2D and 3D space" ... Weta had just taken delivery of 25 Linux workstations from IBM and Labrie reported that IBM and Hewlett Packard were the frontrunners for additional Linux workstation upgrades.

      And, from your own quote:

      From the beginning of preproduction, Weta Digital has also used the IRIX OS-based Octane visual workstations to write extensions to Maya and create proprietary technology. This technology includes Massive, a custom-built crowd animation or "artificial ecology" system developed on IRIX and now ported to Linux that draws from a huge database of motion-capture data. [emphesis mine]

      "Ported. As in past tense. As in done. Based on that quote alone, your assertion of it "being ported" (implying an ongoing, unfinished process) is at odds with what SGI and others are saying (that the process is in fact finished), and with other technical articles on WETA and Massive that appear to indicate it is, in fact, running and being rendered on GNU/Linux systems. It is quite possible they are also rendering in Irix workstations, although the only article I found specifying the hardware mentioned that they had purchased "Silicon Graphics Octane and dual-processor 330 and 230 series Linux workstations." Unless the reporter parsed their English incorrectly (or got their facts wrong) it would appear that the massive rendering is being performed on GNU/Linux boxes (both SGI and generic intel hardware).

      If that is wrong, and you can provide a citation indicating that, I would be greatful (and more than happy to eat my own words).

      From another post [not yours!] which I'll reply to here, as this reply, and indeed yours as well, debunks rather thoroughly:

      the only free software advantage here is that its free. if youre running custom software on a render farm, the OS isnt providing anything anyway.

      To the claim that the operating system contributes nothing to the process, much less the system libraries (e.g. libc, etc.) I can only shake my head at the state of CS education today, or the quality of people claiming expertise in the field (again, not your or your post, but another in this thread which the above quotes debunk).

      The OS, whether it is Irix, FreeBSD, or GNU/Linux, contributes a great deal to the system and its capabilities, be it the clustering technology, the underlying system utilities, capabilities, and stability, the system libraries to which the applications are linked, or simply the raw speed of the operating system (in which GNU/Linux for example clobbers every Microsoft offering there is), which is certainly a non-neglibable concern in such film projects. Given that the operating system is essentially the foundation upon which all else is built, I can only shake my head that there are people reading slashdot, and believing themselves to be technically savvy, who would assert something so fundamentally wrong and trivially falsifiable as "the free software (in this case the OS) ins't providing anything." Indeed, in addition to the examples (performance, system libraries, system services, stability, clustering infrastructure, filesystem access [probably SGI's excellent XFS], security, and speed), there is the counter example of Microsoft Windows itself, whose contribution to the instability and overall flakeyness of services which rely on Windows NT, Windows XP, Windows 2k, etc., be it in terms of interoperability with other standards compliant software, security, or overall stability, is certainly non-zero. Negative, yes (and notoriously so), but, like any other operating system and platform upon which user space software runs, most emphatically non-zero and non-neglibable.
      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  48. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by CrackHappy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh my GOD. I am going to die. I cannot breathe. I am laughing so hard, tears are rolling down my face.

    Thank you for posting this.

    I really need to stop reading /. at work.

    --
    1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d Capitalization really works: i helped my uncle jack off a horse
  49. Cell Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    keep an eye out for a background character in The Two Towers who, in the middle of the battle, seems to take a call on his cellphone

    Don't people ever learn? How many more people have to die before we stop using our cell phones during battle?

  50. Actually by Pac · · Score: 2

    If memory serves, OSDN made them drop "We're smarter than you. Suck it" when they bought the whole thing. But if you Google for it you may find an older version of the FAQ stating that the whole point of the site is to lash out and prove your intellectual superiority.

  51. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actors of colour? I hardly think that a species where an entire gender is missing doesn't classify as being "of colour".

    Or do you have something against the Ents?

    But if you're being serious, there's Irish representation here. And the Irish are pretty colourful.

    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
  52. Re:NEW CATEGORY -- I second that, only for LOTR by simetra · · Score: 2

    Please, please, please, let's have a new category for LOTR so that those of us who don't give a rat's ass about it can never see it.

    Please, oh please oh please already!

    And okay, yes, make a special category for me so you don't have to see my posts. Hardy har har, I beat you to it this time.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  53. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  54. Re:Did you know... by BasharTeg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, but by the time my turn comes around on the XDCC list and I finish receiving it at 1.05 kilobytes per second, the DVD will be out, ordered, delivered, and playing on my television.

  55. (-1, hobbit) by StandardDeviant · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wouldn't that only be -1/2? :)

  56. Dr. Sims Studies Virtual Battle by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it just a coincidence that the biggest set of virtual humans in movie history is studied by a guy called Sims?

  57. The End of the Sims by DeadBugs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe in a few years when the Sims Online has run it's course, they can integrate the "Massive" program and have a huge battle at the end.

    I would pay to see that.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  58. Fuzzy Logic Functions by Sheriff+Fatman · · Score: 2, Funny

    (Nicked from http://www.brunching.com/fuzzylogic.html)

    whatever

    whatever LIST

    This function returns one of the nine neo-boolean values used in fuzzy logic: true, false, maybe, sure, what, whoa, depends, look-let's-talk-about-this-later-when-we're-not-in -public, and elbows. The value returned is determined by standard anti-random vacillation routines.

    reconsider

    reconsider EXPR

    This causes the program to evaluate an expression until such time as it feels reasonably sure of its conclusion. Depending on the system and expression, this may take a fraction of a second or an entire freshman semester.

    while holdon

    while (EXPR) BLOCK holdon (EXPR) BLOCK

    This works like a standard while loop at first, but at some point the function realizes it's been bringing personal issues into the evaluation in an inappropriate manner and begins to evaluate the expression named by holdon instead in an attempt to appear reasonable.

    goaway

    goaway LABEL

    This causes the program to execute starting at LABEL, while making it clear to the program that you could care less whether it ever returned to the present execution point or not. Calling the apology function later may cause the program to return to the statement directly after the goaway, but it may also cause the program to exit entirely, depending on how much you've been taking it for granted. Use of this function has been generally deprecated since the publication of the landmark essay "'GOAWAY' Considered Thoughtless."

    pile

    pile LIST

    This function takes a LIST and sorts it until the function realizes there are too many items in the "miscellaneous" category and tries to figure out a better sorting scheme, then gets bored and leaves a big pile of unsorted items at the end. Returns a semi-sorted list with a big pile of unsorted items at the end.

    grudge

    grudge VARIABLE

    The grudge function causes a program to develop an immediate dislike of the named variable, causing many operations involving that variable to return false for no apparent reason.

    pedestal

    pedestal VARIABLE

    This causes the program to attach unhealthy significance to VARIABLE. The program will consider the named variable to be a microcosm of its own existence and will fall into a deep depression if the variable is undefined, ignored, or treated poorly. Both grudge and pedestal can be used on the same variable, causing the program to develop a love-hate relationship with the variable in question. This can be fun.

    skim

    skim FILEHANDLE

    This function quickly looks over the data contained in FILEHANDLE, trying to get the gist of it and looking for any dirty bits or clever quotations it can use at parties to impress people.

    oblique

    oblique PLAINTEXT, WIT

    The oblique function uses a form of lossy encryption to convert PLAINTEXT into a witty-but-obscure cultural or social reference which will only make sense to people or processes that share a similar background with the calling program. WIT is a number between 0 and 7 which determines the cleverness and obscurity of the reference, where 0 will return a catchphrase from a recent television advertisement and 7 will return a reference to The Consolation of Philosophy by Boethius. With careful application, this function can be used to create entire online humor magazines.

    --
    -- Open Source: It's mad, but you don't have to work here to help.
  59. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by Elentar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone who has read Tolkien's works with half an eye open for cultural stereotypes was probably surprised at how much of the real world pops out in them.

    It is important to understand that Tolkien was raised in a different culture, before racial equality (as opposed to simple racial tolerance) began to be accepted and widespread. I love his books as much as ever, and I can appreciate that he was writing using the cultural ideas of the time. It is not that he wished to be racist - but rather, he had learned that his readers would expect evil to be physically apparent in the form of dark skin and short stature.

    Middle Earth is comprised of vast lands between the ever-shining light of the Uttermost West and the dark, lost lands of the East. Also, because the Elves travelled over the northern ice to reach Middle Earth, the areas to the south are also considered less enlightened.

    The populations of the southern lands are described as 'swarthy' and untrustworthy, and the further east you go the shorter, darker, and less civilized the peoples of Middle Earth (also known as Europe) become. It takes little effort to realize that Numenor, from which the race of kings from which Aragorn is descended comes, is the Isle of Britain and that Eressea, the final stop before the Undying Lands, is Ireland.

    In the Silmarillion, the world is bent from flat to spherical so that no mortal may ever sail the way to the divine lands again. So I'm not sure whether Valinor is America, or whether America is the easternmost land, furthest from the light and wisdom of the West.

    -Elentar

    --
    The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
  60. The Tolkien Cellphone by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Of course, there's humor too:
    • To avoid surprises, Massive programmers weeded out ineffective agents and duplicated ones that worked. About a dozen initial master characters formed the basic genetic blueprint for more than 50,000 digital creations, which were then individualized by adding random variables such as aggression or happiness. (A few update Tolkien; keep an eye out for a background character in The Two Towers who, in the middle of the battle, seems to take a call on his cellphone.)
    At least they're not calling in an air strike, like Granada.
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  61. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Stormie · · Score: 5, Funny

    I saw an entire tech company destroyed by that video. Someone mailed it around the office and reduced all the programmers to gibbering drooling idiots, incapable of ever writing another line of code.

  62. The end of CGi and back to stories... by dargaud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yesterday I went and saw James Bond. There was a whole bunch of action movie previews (including LOTR) before that, where you could (barely) tell that all the action sequences were CGI... And I thought that now that they can do basically anything with CGI we are going to go back to good story lines to distinguish movies. No more 'the story was so-so but the effects where great'. Now that all the movies have effects for anything (explosions, fights, monsters, impossible scenes, dead actors...) they won't be able to do better only based on the effects. The newer Star Wars proved that. As effects become more commonspread and cheaper, I hope the money goes to the (good) story writers.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
    1. Re:The end of CGi and back to stories... by kstumpf · · Score: 2

      I really, really hope you're right. I've felt, for a long time, that the effects craze has diminished movies. I go to maybe two or three movies a year now. I think before people will go back to caring more about substance over glitter, it will take a cultural change. The masses generally have terrible taste, but maybe movies like LOTR can help tip the tide. The Star Wars prequel sure won't. ;)

  63. Re:Did you know... by packeteer · · Score: 2

    and uits people who who download em liek you but dont fix the errors then upload em that cause these problems

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  64. Uhhhhhh by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    I think the assumption is that since the book has been out for (checks book) 48 YEARS if teh date in my edition is correct, that the story is pretty well read and known by now.

    You do realise this whole thing is based off Tolkien's books, right?

  65. The Silmarillion. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, there is a plot. There are five parts.

    Ainulindale, the music of the Ainur. It began with Eru, the One, whom the Elves call Iluvatar. His thoughts became the Ainur, the most mighty of whom were called the Valar (the others were Maiar). As Iluvatar created and shaped Arda, the world, Melkor, mightiest of the Valar, tried to shape the world in his image, to achieve dominance. He rebelled against Iluvatar and was from then on known as Morgoth.

    Valaquenta. Mostly an enumeration of the fourteen Valar (after his fall, Melkor was not counted among them), and the most important of the Maiar, such as Sauron and the Balrogs.

    Quenta Silmarillion. Something about two lamps being destroyed by Morgoth and the Sun and Moon being created to replace them. The First Age starts with the creation of the Sun and ends with Morgoth's final defeat by the Valar. There's some stuff about Silmarils in there, too.

    Akallabeth. As a reward for their service to the Valar, the men who fought with them (the Dunedain, "men of the west") were given a great island which they called Numenor. They built a great empire, but were deceived by Sauron, who told them that if they defeated the Valar and took possession of their forbidden land, Valinor, that they too would become immortal. The last king of Numenor, Ar-Pharazon, tried this, and the Valar called upon Iluvatar to reshape the world. Numenor sunk into the sea (though a few escaped), and Valinor was removed from the plane of the world.

    Of The Rings of Power and the Third Age. Sauron forges the twenty rings of power. The Last Alliance of men and elves defeats him, ending the Second Age. Isildur refuses to destroy the ring; he is killed by the orcs and it is lost. It passes to Gollum, and that's where LOTR begins.

    This is from a quick skimming of The Encyclopedia of Arda. See, when "Gil-galad" or "Morgoth" are mentioned, I can look them up and find out what the heck he's talking about.

    If someone has actually read the Silmarillion, feel free to correct me. I'm leaving out quite a bit and possible screwing other stuff up. (For instance, the dwarves were first-created after the Ainur, but the elves awoke first.)

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:The Silmarillion. by The_Shadows · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Valaquenta. Mostly an enumeration of the fourteen Valar (after his fall, Melkor was not counted among them), and the most important of the Maiar, such as Sauron and the Balrogs.


      And Olorin. You know, Gandalf. Gandalf was, in actuality a Maiar who wanted to remain after the Valar sealed themselves away. Not exactly a fallen Maiar, like Sauron or Balrogs. Make for odd family reunions though.

      I will say that your grasp of the parts you mentioned is fairly cohesive, excluding the parts from the Quenta Silmarillion. The other 4 parts comprise around under 20% of the book "The Silmarillion."

      The Quenta Silmarillion, in addition to the creation of the sun and moon, details the creation and awakening of the elves. It deals with one of the original (or second gen, can't remember now) elves, Feanor and his lust for power. He was the one that created the Silmarils (Silmarillion -- Silmarils, it's not actually coincidence). They were three jewels crafted by Feanor and they contained light from, effectively, the tree of life.

      Morgoth entered a pact with Sheloeb's kin (not entirely clear if it is or isn't actually Sheloeb) to steal all the elves jewels and drain the tree of life. They were successful, and stole the Silmarils as well. The elves and the Valar could have used the Silmarils to restore the tree, had they been present.

      The rest of the Silmarillion revolves around Feanor and his offspring having taken an oath to find the Silmarils and keep them, and to fight anyone who got in their way, including the Valar. They were outcast into Middle-Earth.

      The story then goes through to be one of the more potent that Tolkien has written. It details the arrival of men and dwarves, the lives of the elves and their collective struggle against Morgoth.

      It contains, among other things, the stories of Turin, Beren and Luthien, the final downfall of Morgoth, and the eventual loss of the Silmarils.

      So, I'm really just expounding on what you said. But, it's a great book, and I really would recommend it.

    2. Re:The Silmarillion. by Linknoid · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've read it. Actually, most of the book is Quenta Silmarillion. The other parts are kind of like an introduction and a followup on what happened afterwards. Shelob, the giant spider who shows up near the end of TTT, was the last child of Ungoliant. Morgoth, whom Sauron had only been a servant of, offered the two trees, Telperion (which the white tree in Gondor was in the image of) and Laurelin, that Yavanna (another of the Valar) had created to light middle earth. Ungoliant would have killed Morgoth after consuming the trees, but Morgoth's Balrogs came and rescued him. Anyway, once the trees were destroyed, the only place where the glory of them was preserved was in the Silmarils, which Feanor had created (two leaves that were saved, one from each tree, and carried by 2 Maiar to become the Sun and the Moon). Yavanna asked for the Silmarils so she might try to save the trees, but Feanor refused. While the elves and valar were arguing about what to do, Morgoth broke into Feanor's home and stole the Silmarils. When Feanor found out what happened, he and his sons swore an oath that they would not rest until the Silmarils were in their possession. They followed Morgoth to Middle Earth, killing kin along the way and getting banned from returning, and waged a long war against Morgoth and his servants. Most of the Silmarillion is the story of that war. Feanor died right away in battle, but his sons had to keep their oath for many millenia. Finally Earendil, son (or was it grandson) of Beren (who had cut a Silmaril from Morgoth's crown with the help of Luthien), took the Silmaril and sailed for the forbidden land of Aman, where the Valar and the elves who had not followed Feanor lived. He convinced the Valar to get in the act, but he was not permitted to return to middle earth. Instead, he was to carry the Silmaril across the heavens, which is where the light came from in the Phial that Galadriel gave to Frodo. Anyway, the Valar finally got in the act and broke Morgoth's stronghold, Thangorodrim, and banished him from the world. Sauron fled rather than submit to the Valar. But that leaves out all the stories of the war between the elves and Morgoth, which is most of the story. Sauron took new form and gained favor with the elves, and they made their rings of power, and when he had fasioned The One Ring, he demanded the other rings be turned over to him because they had been made from his knowledge. But Celebrimor had made the 3 most powerful, Nalya, Nenya, and Vilya, and when Sauron put on his right, the elves became aware of him and hid the three, and did not use them. After the Last Alliance, when Isildur cut the ring from Sauron's hand, Isildur travelled north, and thinking all the enemy had been destroyed, didn't realize the ring attracted orcs. His company was ambushed, and he escaped via the ring, but while he swam away, the ring slipped from his finger into the Anduin, and the orcs saw him and shot him. There it laid until Smeagol found it, and well, the rest is found in LotR, for the most part. Hope that helps a bit. It's a long and challenging read, with many, many names of people and places, don't expect a LotR type story.

    3. Re:The Silmarillion. by Nept · · Score: 2

      the silmarillion is just the beginning...
      The 12 volumes of the history of middle earth (and the book of unfinished tales) are worth reading.

      The Book of Lost Tales 1 & 2
      The Lays of Beleriand
      the Shaping of Middle Earth
      The Lost Road
      the Return of the Shadow
      The Treason of Isengard
      The War of the Ring
      Sauron Defeated
      Morgoth's Ring
      The war of the Jewels
      the peoples of middle earth

      Actually, Sauron defeated was interesting because it had a sci-fi story by Tolkien in it. He wrote it on a bet with CS Lewis - csl ended up writing the space trilogy, out of a silent planet etc., while nothing much came of Tolkien's except for an interesting short story on some members of a group like the Inklings Numenor.
      Also, the PoME has the rough draft for the LotR sequel. It's extremely exciting, and dissapointing that Tolkien didn't finish it.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    4. Re:The Silmarillion. by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If someone has actually read the Silmarillion, feel free to correct me.

      I've actually read the Silmarillion, and, indeed, I prefer it to the Lord of the Rings. However, it has to be said that I've also read the Old Testament, the Heimskringla and assorted other similar things. You can't approach the Silmarillion as if it were a novel. It isn't. It's a complete synthetic mythos, one of very few that exist, and probably the best.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    5. Re:The Silmarillion. by Scooter · · Score: 2

      Music of the Ainur:-

      "I don like Krikitar. Ooooh No.. Illuvatar.."

      Is that my cloak?

    6. Re:The Silmarillion. by BoneFlower · · Score: 2


      And Olorin. You know, Gandalf. Gandalf was, in actuality a Maiar who wanted to remain after the Valar sealed themselves away. Not exactly a fallen Maiar, like Sauron or Balrogs. Make for odd family reunions though

      Actually, in the beginning of the Third Age, the Valar sent 5 of the Maia to Middle Earth to guard against the return of Sauron. Their powers were limited to ward against the corruption of the other Maia who had gone to middle earth(the who absolute power corrupts absolutely thing) though they obviously were immensely powerful. These are the Istari- Saruman the White, leader of the council, Gandalf the Grey, Radagast the Brown, and two others who wore blue robes and went into the east prior to Fellowship(at least one joining the pirate bands south of Mordor) and were effectively non players since the ejection of Sauron from Mirkwood. And as we saw, only two of them still supported good at the opening of LOTR(Gandalf and Radagast) and only Gandalf was fully commited to his original charge. But in the end, it was enough. Gandalfs interest in the people of middle earth, especially the Hobbits, was thankfully enough in the end for the mission of the Istari to be a success, despite the total loss of two of the 5, treason of a third(Saruman), and general apathy of a fourth(Radagast).

      The tale of the Istari can be a lesson- Radagast was lost in his animals and plants, and lost touch with his mission to protect the free peoples from lack of contact with sentients. Saruman felt his powers elevated him above those he was charged with defending, thus was corrupted thoroughly. Gandalf however, he was engaged with people- He made friends of all, Kings down to the lowest peasant were treated as equals. These connections grounded him and enabled him to use his great power with responsibility and honor, and to the benefit of all life.

      Tolkien may not have knowingly set out to teach moral lessons when he wrote, but they crept in anyways.

    7. Re:The Silmarillion. by BoneFlower · · Score: 2

      Were the blue wizards lost?

      From what I remember reading, they went off and basically were never heard from again, except one that threw in with the corsairs to the southeast, but even he never made a significant impact after Sauron was thrown out of Mirkwood. I could be wrong though, I haven't read everything.

  66. Re:Did you know by yomegaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, I'm sure New Line spent $0 on promotion, and they get every penny of the box office with the theaters getting nothing.

    --
    ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  67. Re:I only hope..... by stickyc · · Score: 2

    Actually, I was amazed at the bookmovie accuracy of Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas, given the majority of the subject matter. Most directors would have copped out on the acid trip scenes and used it for an excuse to put their own (or the DP's or the art directors, or...) views of being under the influence on the screen.

  68. This is already happening! by PCM2 · · Score: 2
    We may witness the birth of Agent Smith's (of Matrix fame) Ancestors.
    If you had even watched the first movie, you'd know that in the Middle-Earth universe, Agent Smith is already here. In fact, he's been around since back when Elendil was still battling Sauron with a sword.
    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:This is already happening! by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      If you had even watched the first movie, you'd know that in the Middle-Earth universe, Agent Smith is already here. In fact, he's been around since back when Elendil was still battling Sauron with a sword.

      And he plays exactly the same character as he does in the Matrix: "Welcome to Rivendell... Mr Baggins".

    2. Re:This is already happening! by Matthaeus · · Score: 2

      As you can see, Sauron's had his...eye on you for...some time now, Mr. Underhill.

  69. You left off a few. by gblues · · Score: 2
    The boat sinks.
    It's the cripple.
    It's himself.
    The butler did it.

    Nathan

    1. Re:You left off a few. by gblues · · Score: 2

      Actually #1 was Titanic. :) You nailed the others, though.

      Nathan

  70. Grenada by wiredog · · Score: 4, Funny
    They didn't use cell phones, they used pay phones and calling cards. When I was in the Army in 85-88 I knew some guys who were there.

    The only one I knew who was wounded by enemy, rather than friendly, action was shot in the ass by an irate farmer, armed with a shotgun, who thought it 'them damn kids' after his livestock again.

  71. Ents. by FireballFreddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want to see an Ent beat the living crap out of Julia Butterfly Hill.

    "Get those nasty feet off me, pathetic human!"

    -FF

    --
    SQUEAK, the Death of Rats explained.
  72. actually by peterjm · · Score: 2

    24 fps is what movies are shown at.

    24 of those little film cells run past the light projector every second. However, if you could count the flashes of light on the screen, you would see 48. This is because, for every cell, an inverted fan with two non-blades (*), allows the light to pass through the lens twice. hence, each cell is flashed on the screen twice and the effective fps is 48.

    I was a projectionist here in santa cruz for a while about 5 years ago. Fun job, basically just paid to smoke and start a few movies every few hours. Plus I got to toy with the sound in the theatres. I used to crank it up for the mib closing track.

    (*) picture a fan with two blades. Now picture a metal ring connecting the outside of the fan blades. Now invert the fan-blade, no-fan-blade spots (ie, there are two holes which are smaller than the spots that don't all the light to pass through), and you've probably got a picture of this thing in your head.

  73. Better idea by wadetemp · · Score: 2

    I don't know if this is what you're getting at or not, but wouldn't it be cool if rather than UI, all 50,000 characters "filmed" in the movie were controled in some kind of realtime online battle game made specifically for the "filming" of the scene? And then you'd get to try to find yourself in the battle when the movie hit theatres?

    Unfortunately half of the creatures would be spinning in place or jumping up and down and making gestures. But hey, it *could* be cool.

  74. Re:No one believed me... by kpansky · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, but you're missing the point. It was _the_ first movie to use computers in a very direct and visible way. The first time you saw a character "glow" was the very first combination of live action and computer animation in a seamless (more or less) way.

    Truly revolutionary. Sorta like the first guy to combine peanuts and beer.

    --

    --Kevin
  75. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Ninja+Programmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is why /. needs a special "6" score for certain posts. God damnit, that's fricking funniest thing I have ever seen!

  76. Re:50,000? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    Yes, I believe so. What's more, Tolkien had names and complete family histories for every single one, too.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  77. Uhhhhh part 2 by wadetemp · · Score: 2

    You do realize you don't read every book in the library through telepathy just becuase you're within telepathic range of the library, don't you?

    1. Re:Uhhhhh part 2 by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      This is just slightly different. First off, Tolkien's universe forms the basis of an enormous amount of fantasy worlds today. D&D is a good example, while certianly unique in its own right, you can clearly see the Tolkenian roots. Second, and related to that, the books are very popular and well known. They are the kind of thing that even poeple who are not in to fantasy read. Third, the release of the movie has caused the books to be republished and featured promenatly in bookstores again. Finally, however, I think it is not unreasonable to expect that if you really care about the story you would read the books FIRST since their version is the correct, and unedited version. The movies are an interpretation and abbreviation of the story told in the books.

      I think it is a little silly to whine about someone ruining the story to these movies, when it is such a well known story. We aren't talking obsuce literature here, but a fantasy world so large and well known that it has it's own complete history, mythology and even a couple of languages.

  78. PARENT: +5 Spoiler by fferreres · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Handle with care. I read LOTR so much time ago that I forgot all the details. I'm trying and making a huge effort not to remember anything. Would be nice not to see many spoilers and still be able to have a discussion about the visual effects and other generics that do not tell what will happen.

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  79. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 2

    I suspect the latter; Tolkien had something of a reactionary bent. His books support a belief in a natural aristocracy, rather than meritocracy. His notion of bloodlines is inconsistent with hybrid vigor. ("The race of men has declined." "The blood of Numinor has grown thin.")

    Also, living in WWII Britain, the men held the belief that there were 3 things wrong with yanks: overpaid, oversexed, and over here. A conservative might be more inclined to believe this than otherwise.

    I love the books. I don't buy the ideology.

  80. Availability by wadetemp · · Score: 2

    Had I also been available for those 60 years I might have read them.

  81. Re:I only hope..... by meringuoid · · Score: 2
    The size of the hobbits still keeps changing.

    Yeah, and in episode 2F09, when Itchy plays Scratchy's skeleton like a xylophone, he strikes the same rib twice in succession, yet he produces two clearly different tones. I mean, what are we to believe, that this is some sort of a (heh heh) magic xylophone or something? Boy, I really hope somebody got fired for that blunder.

    Actually, that was the error that I noticed the most, and actually found annoying. We see a _lot_ of Frodo, and he's frequently standing right next to either Gandalf or Aragorn - and he varies enormously in height. Gimli stays much the same - it seems to be just the Hobbits who change in size.

    This isn't a geeky pedant point like the comment about Scratchy's ribs; this is a fundamental physical characteristic of the main character of a major motion picture. Just how tall is Frodo supposed to be? This is something that _does_ get noticed; several friends who didn't really know the books came out wondering exactly how tall Hobbits were relative to Men. The film had been extremely ambiguous.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  82. Re:Offtopic, but interresting by Faggot · · Score: 2

    No no, you've missed the point entirely. How else is a dog going to deflect a slapshot aimed at its head?

    --

    But what do I know. I'm just looking for anonymous gay sex.

  83. NOT Memento by PatientZero · · Score: 2

    "It was him" doesn't actually cover Memento. For that one, "It *wasn't* him" is correct.

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  84. Re:The real question. by lpret · · Score: 2

    Actually the Playstation 3 is supposed to be clusterable. You'll be able to share processing power and thus be able to render stuff like this. I guess some of their R&D guys read Slashdot and thought "it'd be funny if you had a beowulf clust..."

    (Sees his karma rise, then drop)

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  85. Stop laughing... there might be some future here by Goldenhawk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    After I stopped laughing at the parent post, I had to ask myself *when*, not *if*, this actually might be the way movie theaters work.

    After all, if you can really generate a scene completely in software, it probably takes a LOT fewer bytes to describe it than the raw imagery. How big was the entire source material for Final Fantasy? I'd bet it was a LOT smaller than a fully-digital movie at full theater resolution.

    Taken to its logical conclusion, I wonder how far away the day will be when a "movie" as delivered to the studio is actually merely the script, along with a bunch of texture files, character maps, landscape grids, MIDI files, etc., essentially a huge .WAD file. I can easily see the day when a photorealistic movie could be generated solely by the computer.

    To karma whore for a second, too, it's interesting to note that if the movie theater rendering system that drove this method were sufficiently more advanced than the average user's home PC, it would make it completely impossible to pirate a digital movie on a 1-for-1 basis - you'd only be able to capture the rendered film, and have a much larger digital file to handle. What a bonus for the movie industry that could be.

    A final thought about this idea. Assuming that the hardware in each theater were not identical, and even if they were, it's entirely likely that each time the film were projected (hence rendered then projected), it would be slightly different. Hmmm.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  86. Automated crowd scenes by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful
    CG effects people have been doing this sort of thing for a while, and it's been getting steadily better. Early attempts include the penguin army in one of the Batman movies, and the baby 'zillas in Godzilla. Back when I was doing Falling Bodies in 1997, another startup did KinemaWay, which was a particle-based system for crowd scenes, done as a plug-in for Softimage|3D. Worked OK, but the market is so tiny that it's hard to make any money selling such a thing as a software package. Motion Factory did something a bit more powerful as a game engine, but that engine was used for Prince of Persia 3D and not heard from again. Recently, it's resurfaced as a part of Softimage|XSI, selling for $40K.

    So far, the characters driven by these systems don't have real physics. They're mostly canned animation sequences being keyed by a state machine. Often, the moves are motion-captured and blended; otherwise they're created by animators. It's more of an automated cut-and-paste at the motion level than general motion generation as in robotics. The motions generated wouldn't necessarily work in the real world, but from a distance, they look good.

    Incidentally, doing software for Hollywood is a pain. Hollywood film projects have two modes. Either the project is in development hell and they don't have any money but want freebies. Or the project is in production and there's plenty of money but no time.

    1. Re:Automated crowd scenes by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      Thanks for rehashing all of the INSIGHTFUL and INTERESTING posts from ALL of the previous slashdot stories on Massive(TM)

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  87. That would be nice... by Milinar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but the hollywood infrastructure is such that writers are almost at the bottom of the food chain. Effects studios are definitely at the bottom, but once a script is sold the writer has very little, if any, control over it.

    Next time you go see a movie, try and think about what was stupid and what might have worked if X or Y was different about it. You'll see that there are many promising scripts out there that get ruined by bad actors, directors, etc.

    I'm not a screenwriter or an insider or anything, but I've had ambitions for a while, but decided that it was probably the most frustrating job in the world, to have your ideas taken and twisted around until they're an unrecognizable pile of steaming crap, for basically peanuts.

    So I decided to go into CGI. God knows what I was smoking when I decided that one.

  88. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by vicviper · · Score: 3, Funny

    When Yoda was babbling on about fear, *this* is what he was talking about.

  89. Re:I only hope..... by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you watch them in front of an open fire drinking wine?

    A nice chianti would seem appropriate...

  90. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Or maybe there just weren't than many 'coloured' people back in ancient england/euorpe where the story was set in.

  91. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

    Ah, I cough up scarier things before breakfast.

    --
    "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  92. Re:I only hope..... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    No no, I was agreeing with him. Hence the thing about "no offense to you personally" I was making sure I mentioned that my diatribe was not directed at him, but at the people who noticed stuff like that and harped on it enough that he probably found out about it.

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  93. I haven't read the books by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    Could someone who has read the books tell those of us who haven't if the two towers resist the attack of the 747s in the movie, or do they come crashing down?
    1. Re:I haven't read the books by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      Dude you've got to wait at least 2 years before posting black humor like this. I think it's funny just for the creative juxtapostion but it's still too early for some folks.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  94. Re:warning....if you like LOTR & ST don't look by simetra · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, it's a pretty catchy tune.

    I might actually see Twin Towers now, just to hear that theme song again.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  95. I submitted this three weeks ago... by crashnbur · · Score: 2

    ...and it was rejected. I'm confused.

  96. Re:I only hope..... by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

    This isn't a geeky pedant point like the comment about Scratchy's ribs; this is a fundamental physical characteristic of the main character of a major motion picture. Just how tall is Frodo supposed to be?

    Somewhere in the documentaries or the commentaries or someplace buried in the ~18 hours of stuff on the extended edition DVD set, somebody makes mention of a really great point. Tolkien wrote (allegedly; see my other posts for my experience with the books) that hobbits are smaller than men a few times, but for the most part didn't keep bringing it up. He didn't keep saying things like, "Frodo looked at Gandalf, craning his neck upward and straining to make out the wizard's features from the approximate level of his belly-button." Instead, he just established that hobbits are shorter than men, and then moved on to talk about Tom Bombadil or some other damn fool way of avoiding getting on with the plot.

    Er, sorry. Bit of a digression.

    Anyway, the point is that they didn't spend a lot of time trying to get the hobbits exactly right in the films. They used a few tricky and expensive establishing shots to say that hobbits are shorter than men, and used scale doubles in every wide shot, but for the most part they just told the story and didn't make a big deal out of the details.

    Actually, there are a few shots in Fellowship where they just didn't care about scale at all, but it works anyway because your eye is already accustomed to thinking of hobbits as small. I'm thinking specifically of the shot where Boromir tackles Frodo just before the big fight on Amon Hen. No scale doubles, no forced perspective, just Sean Bean body-tackling Elijah Wood. On the screen, it really looks like Boromir is twice Frodo's size.

    --

    I write in my journal
  97. The sickness of glorifying war by David+Wong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I for one look to the day when nations can resolve their differences with such software rather than actual warfare.

    There is no excuse for sacrificing young lives when a simple computer simulation would show the world exactly how the USA would kick their asses deeply into the dirt.

    1. Re:The sickness of glorifying war by msouth · · Score: 2

      like we did in viet nam, you mean?

      --
      Liberty uber alles.
    2. Re:The sickness of glorifying war by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

      naahhh.... you would get own3d by russian haxors... >:)

  98. Games Dude, Games! by Luminous · · Score: 2

    When is this technology going to be incorporated into games? I want to raise an army and send it against my foes!!

    --
    This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  99. Funny you should say that. by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 2

    Lord of the Cock Ring has been the named dubbed to a very, very off broadway play in NY. Its somewhere down in the village, I think Tribeca area. I really can't remember, I was rather drunk. A search of google or Timeout.com should find it though.

  100. It's worse than that by duck_prime · · Score: 2
    How many more people have to die before we stop using our cell phones during battle?
    It's worse than that... that orc was also driving a chariot at the same time. He came *this* *close* to running over some elves.
  101. TRON characters weren't CG by kobotronic · · Score: 2

    The backgrounds and the various vehicles were CG in Tron; everything else, esp. the characters and the "glow" suits (made mostly of foam latex iirc) were illuminated and colorized with mechanical animation masking techniques -- each on-screen frame with glow suit characters and CG background were laboriously composited on animation stands with handmade (!) opague stencils and different colored gels for the "glow" layers. Thus, TRON, while deservedly acclaimed for its spectacular CG pioneering efforts, did not as such really venture into CG character animaton.

    Pixar's TIN TOY wasn't until 1988, and before that there really hadn't been anything remotely credible in the way of CG animated human (or truly realistic animal) characters, flexing skin and kinetic joints with tension, etc. Can you think of anything appearing before 1988 which had actual computer animated humans in it?

    1. Re:TRON characters weren't CG by Soulslayer · · Score: 2

      Can you think of anything appearing before 1988 which had actual computer animated humans in it?

      Young Sherlock Holmes is generally credited as beign the first major motion picture to use CG for an animated character in a film. It also marked the first time CG had been used to represent something that was meant to be a real part of the movies world rather than a simulation or part of a computer (such as in Wrath of Khan or Tron). The movie came out in 1985.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    2. Re:TRON characters weren't CG by Soulslayer · · Score: 2

      I forgot to mention.

      The CG character was a knight composed of stained glass. I remember beign extremely impressed with this effect when I originally saw the film in theaters.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
  102. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It is important to understand that Tolkien was raised in a different culture, before racial equality (as opposed to simple racial tolerance) began to be accepted and widespread.

    yeah, yeah, blah, blah, blah. It's better for everyone not to participate in any kind of "Tolkien was a racist" discussion, because most likely nothing fruitful will ever come from it. =)

    In the Silmarillion, the world is bent from flat to spherical so that no mortal may ever sail the way to the divine lands again. So I'm not sure whether Valinor is America, or whether America is the easternmost land, furthest from the light and wisdom of the West.

    I don't remember enough of Tolkien maps, and may be not knowing anything, so thwack me, but wasn't there a land mass east of that of Middle-Earth? Not well described, and that would have been the Americas. I was always thinking of Valinor as a third big land mass with no modern counterpart whatsoever.

    this was the best map I could find?

  103. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

    Well, orcs are kinda green, does that count? And the Balrog was black. Yeah, he's a villain, but at least he doesn't rap or sells drugs.
    Really, people who HAS to see everything through their own racist sensibilities are such lamers.
    Damn. Have to remember to stop feeding the trolls...

  104. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

    Didn't you see "Robin Hood Prince of Thieves"? If you can sign Morgan Freeman, then you can have colored people anywhere, whether it makes sense or not...

  105. Re:Good point. by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

    Or we're all just being modded -1 Flamebait or -1 Offtopic.

    *grumble*

    I didn't watch any trailers for Die Another Day, I will not watch any for Star Trek : Nemesis, The Two Towers, Matrix 2, Terminator 3, or X-Men 2.

    I guess I care too much about these movies to allow the trailers to ruin them for me. And trust me, I have a near photographic memory when it comes to trailers.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  106. Re:I like this movie and all, but where are the by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

    Hey,

    It takes little effort to realize that Numenor, from which the race of kings from which Aragorn is descended comes, is the Isle of Britain and that Eressea, the final stop before the Undying Lands, is Ireland.

    Tolkien repeatedly stated that he did not intend his story to be represetative of anything. Isn't it possible that you're reading too much into it?

    One could say that the Harry Potter series is about how if you want to succeed in life, you need the right parents, connections in the establishment, and natural sporting ability. But this would be, well, silly.

    It's easy to 'read in' undertones that aren't there. Sometimes it's better to enjoy a book as nothing more than fiction.

    Just my $0.02,

    Michael

    --
    "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  107. Re:Welcome Friend. by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2

    That's cool.

    I have a few weirdo political/social/economic views, myself. =)

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  108. Right yes, sorry by PatientZero · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I thought the other posting was saying that it was Lenny that killed his wife. God that was such a good movie. Definitely required multiple viewings to catch everything. I also liked the use of black-n-white versus color to merge the two timelines (one going forward, the other backward) at the end. Brilliant!

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!