Slashdot Mirror


Christmas in 2050

Makarand writes "A robotic kitchen assistant will help you with the Christmas meal preparations while you recieve instructions and monitoring assistance in real time from information systems for the cooking. Thanks to progress in biology and nanotechnology, the molecular processes needed to convert raw materials into turkey will be understood sufficiently well to make a good artificial turkey for the vegetarians. This is what we can expect this time in 2050 says Ian Pearson, BT's futurologist who is paid to dream, in this BBC News article. Absent family will join the celebrations virtually. There might be technology allowing us to read each others minds and being able to know what others are thinking may not always add peace and harmony to the celebrations. However on the upside, it will make charades a whole lot easier you will never get unwanted Christmas presents. Lastly, just as this Christmas was hijacked by a consumption fever, so too in 2050, Christmas will be all about presents."

306 comments

  1. that's a lot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    coming from the company that believes it invented the hyperlink!

    1. Re:that's a lot... by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      That's BT as in British Telecom. Not BBC. Perhaps you meant country.

    2. Re:that's a lot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      uhh.. check the article
      ... This is what we can expect this time in 2050 says Ian Pearson, BT's futurologist who is paid to dream ...
  2. third post by joe_bruin · · Score: 0, Troll

    how sweet it is

  3. hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, and by 2050 ill get laid... hahaha :(

    1. Re:hahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laid to rest possibly, laid, hardly. Women do not make passes at geeks who run *nix.

  4. Old news by GlassUser · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We were hearing about this in the 1940's. Sooo where's our jet packs, personal helicopters, and automated kitchens?

    Seriously, I think the people that dream up this stuff reduce the time to market by a factor of at least three. The dreams are great and all, but obviously not realistic.

    1. Re:Old news by zephc · · Score: 2

      "Sooo where's our jet packs"

      right here =]

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    2. Re:Old news by noshellswill · · Score: 0

      Yawn ... and NO improvement either. Jet-packs, huh ... what's next an a-u-t-o-m-a-t-e-d chick teller? HUGE improvement, pad're ... I'll stick with the babes, inside straights and grilled steak.

    3. Re:Old news by JebusIsLord · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think, and I borrow loosely from Arthur C Clarke, that people always seem to underestimate human inginutity and overestimate the abundance of resources in the future. So for instance, the 60s view of 2002 looked like the 60s only with infinite resources to do whatever they wanted with simply improved 60s tech. We don't have hundreds of space stations, personal shuttles and such because we don't have infinite money, but we DO have computers that fit in the palms our our hands, and who would have thought that back then?

      --
      Jeremy
    4. Re:Old news by GMontag · · Score: 2

      yea, and I personally remember hearing of it since I was a kid in the 60's

      will add: where is the new ice age (not nuclear witer) and where is the global famine (not brutal regime induced, see "A Bed for the Night" by David Rieff)?

    5. Re:Old news by Pierre+Anoid · · Score: 1

      Exactly it always begins with "a robot will do the work". Well then how will yours truly and everyone else get money for work if it is all being done by robots. Labour losses through technological unemployment are hurting all nations of the world. But then I picked up this idea from various authors including in Riffkins The end of work. Lets get with it as programmers... we must think of the guy who needs work not eliminating jobs by auto-mation. Give us a break we can just as easily watch cop shows on TV, then consuming star trek and working with computers.

    6. Re:Old news by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      simply improved 60s tech. We don't have hundreds of space stations, personal shuttles and such because we don't have infinite money, but we DO have computers that fit in the palms our our hands,

      In that case, I predict that in 2050 we will have computers that fit in my pee hole that are at least twice as powerful as today's desktops.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    7. Re:Old news by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Labour losses through technological unemployment are hurting all nations of the world

      IMHO, the problem isn't labor losses through technological employment, it's the inability of society to catch up with technology. Or rather, technology has been improving so fast lately that the job market hasn't caught up with it yet.

      First a new technology comes out, or an old technology becomes affordable to everyone (the internet). Next we see a bunch of hiring in that sector. Next we see a crash, and the previously fast growing sector is in a labor crunch, dumping staff left and right.

      Also, overpopulation MUST be a contributing factor to the job shortages at this time. Our food methods are efficient enough to keep us all alive (for now, and I'm ignoring the countries that are still having serious hunger problems because many of them have become political balls in our own country and I'd prefer not to approach this subject at this time). Therefore, we do not need hunters. What do hunters do now? Well, they get diagnosed AD&D, er, ADHD, given drugs and spend the rest of their lives as losers living with their parents. But I digress.

      When a robot does the work, someone gets paid to make the robot, somehow. Sure, a group of robots might push out cars faster than a group of people, but who builds the robots? Obviously another assembly line packed with robots. So "building" now becomes what "engineering" used to be, and the thug labor that would've done the job before has to do something else. But what?

      Therein lies the problem. We don't have enough jobs to go around, but we definitely have too many people. I certainly don't wish suffering upon anybody, but perhaps some mass-killing machine would help. :)

      Anyway, many of our labor problems would be solved if we entered a true state of space exploration. When overpopulation pressures hit Europe, they had the fortune of re-discovering America to relieve the pressure. Japan went to war in the '30's because of their overpopulation, and technology has helped to alleviate their problem. But there's literally no place left for us to go, unless we start building underwater or on Antarctica (problematic when the surface altitude changes seasonally, but possible).

      So the magical solution to all of our problems is technology, but only insofar as technology helps us to enter either a new period of expansionism or a massively destructive war.

      Which one do you *want* to have?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    8. Re:Old news by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Crap, I'm responding to your signature, not your post.

      What would Jesus drive? Well, wasn't he broke? So he'd take the city bus, right?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    9. Re:Old news by Saeger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well then how will yours truly and everyone else get money for work if it is all being done by robots.

      When robots are doing all the menial & skilled labor, and your 'nanoreplicator' is producing all your food and any physical object you could desire, and AI has replaced your programming job :) , well, that'll be the day that WELFARE isn't a derogatory term....... (even though a WORK ETHIC will still be deeply ingrained in many people)....... oh, and we'll have to kill all the landlords so we can live rent-free and shit on each others free property.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    10. Re:Old news by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Therefore, we do not need hunters. What do hunters do now?

      Play football? Become a criminal predator? Join the army? Get a job in advertising? :)

      But there's literally no place left for us to go, unless we start building underwater or on Antarctica (problematic when the surface altitude changes seasonally, but possible).

      Hey, don't leave out the ocean's surface. There's room enough to build thousands of state-sized floating cities for us meat-popsicles.

      After that point, yeah, there's space, but rockets probably can't cheaply blast people off Earth faster than they're being born (2.3 babies per second). Maybe if we built a ring of space elevators around the equator we could spit the human sardines offplanet faster... I don't know. Or maybe the best solution is to expand to innerspace and leave our bulky biological bodies in the dust.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    11. Re:Old news by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Hey, don't leave out the ocean's surface. There's room enough to build thousands of state-sized floating cities for us meat-popsicles.

      Near as I can tell, it's a resource problem there. If we can get under the oceans safely we might have a shot at mining underneath the oceans, or something like that. The advantage to going to space is there's a reasonable chance we'll get raw materials there to continue our expansion. Going to the ocean's surface doesn't give us that, unfortunately. NOt that it won't help, but it will further sap existing resources.

      After that point, yeah, there's space, but rockets probably can't cheaply blast people off Earth faster than they're being born

      For this I refer you to Heinlein, but I forget which book he discusses this in (it might well be multiple books). It's not so important to save everybody on the earth right now, it's important to get some good minds and bodies off the planet in an autonomous fashion. The earth can kill itself, but the race will live on. This is something people tend to overlook when discussing these problems. It's just not important how many people leave compared to how many are being born, it's only important to get enough people out there that the race survives.

      However, if the race survives but the earth still dies, we haven't prevented the suffering. But first let's deal with the survival problem, then we'll deal with the suffering problem. Can't end suffering, but with any luck we might well be able to prevent foreseeable suffering.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    12. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      there would still be jobs in entertainment, law, politics, prostituton, and, um, Im drawing a blank for more. society will want to reward these valuable people with special things so that they keep doing it well. what's special in a future where most things are free? not much i can think of except for the royal treatment and an extra share of really rare things like antiques and realesate.

      just because we have cars does not mean people stop running and walking, and just because we dont have to work for basic life needs does not mean people will stop working at things they like even if machines do it better. homemade jam is tastier than that schmuckers brand.

      I thought lots about this subject for a school paper.

    13. Re:Old news by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2
      Huh. Good point. I would like to add a slightly offtopic A.C.Clark quote;
      'The skyhook(meaning space elevator type thingy) will be built 50 years after people stop laughing about it'

      A.C.C didn't invent a thing, but he sure saw a long way....

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    14. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should read more Gore Vidal and listen less to the huckesters of religon?

      Jesus was not a carpenter, but t general contractor. He was also a school trained "circut-riding" Rabbi. Some question as to his poverty too.

      Given the first two of the above and working in the desert, he would obviously be driving a Dodge 2500 4X4, or larger.

    15. Re:Old news by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Given the first two of the above and working in the desert, he would obviously be driving a Dodge 2500 4X4, or larger.

      Ok, I give the first two of the above.

      However, when I lived in the desert, there seemed to be an awful lot of Chevy half-tons and very few (if any) Dodges of any sort. Of course, this is because I lived in less-rich (?) parts of the desert, so people drove the stuff that kept on working rather than the stuff that kept on breaking....

      However, if Jesus is content to drive a Dodge, I'll just keep an eye out for him. If he needs a ride, I'll make sure to offer it to him just so I can BASH HIS FUCKIN' HEAD IN.

      And thus I have proven that my brief rampage on christianity isn't over yet. Hm.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    16. Re:Old news by Lispy · · Score: 1

      That's very true. Another point i see is that they keep forgetting that people often think traditional. I live in a nice old building (about 100 years old) and I wouldn't install any screen wallpaper in it. The point is: Old things are nice too and people tend to keep it. Therefore sci-fi movies where EVERYTHING is new and stylish feel so unrealistic (StarTrek). Scenarios where new things are added to old, traditional stuff have a much more serious touch (such as bladerunner or maybe fifth element).
      but, we'll see...

      cu,
      Lispy

    17. Re:Old news by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      'The skyhook(meaning space elevator type thingy) will be built 50 years after people stop laughing about it'

      Pass a law making it illegal to laugh about the skyhook. It follows 50 years later.

    18. Re:Old news by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      " there would still be jobs in entertainment, law, politics, prostituton..."

      That is all the same field.
      Everyone else will want something to do.

    19. Re:Old news by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      A.C.C didn't invent a thing, but he sure saw a long way....

      Other than the concept of geosynchronous satellites...

    20. Re:Old news by VikingBerserker · · Score: 2

      Well, I finally have my nuclear-powered hovercraft that we were all promised in 1950's newsreels. Of course, it helps to work for Bruce Wayne.

    21. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      jet packs are a stupid technology, which is why we don't use them. military has been working on making them a less stupid technology for several decades now, but it doesn't work. Fact is that we have a lot of things people predected even up to 100 years ago. We have the internet, computers in cars, e-mail, instant messaging, suburbia, mass market consumption, and yes... even food pills (for those who want them). Point is that this is already the future. We just don't see it. Kind of ironic, I think.

    22. Re:Old news by hackstraw · · Score: 2
      I think its time that we start speaking of "technology" like any other "ology" like cosmology, psychology, philosophy, etc. and not as if its some thing that has come from aliens. Its not. technology is the knowledge and ability to use such "modern devices", and these devices are created by people for people. How far would a kid who cannot read or do arithmatic get with an advanced programmable calculator?

      Now for the Christmas in 2050. It meantions the robot assistant in the kitchen. Where the hell are these things now? Just the other day I wanted a small robot to feed my cats when I was out of town. I'd buy one in a heartbeat. And there are many other simple repetitions physical tasks like this that can be done by robots, but noone has them. Not even the "rich and famous". Why is this? Robots have been around for a long time in industrial settings, and they haven't taken over the world or anything, but there are 0 home robots. We have been writing about robots since at least the 20's with Buck Rogers. Am I the only person out there that would buy a little personal robot for something like feeding the cats?

    23. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A robotic kitchen assistant will help you with the Christmas meal preparations while you recieve instructions and monitoring assistance in real time from information systems for the cooking.

      LOL!!!

      Thanks to progress in biology and nanotechnology, the molecular processes needed to convert raw materials into turkey will be understood sufficiently well to make a good artificial turkey for the vegetarians.

      ROFL!!!!!!!

      This is what we can expect this time in 2050 says Ian Pearson, BT's futurologist who is paid to dream, in this BBC News article.

      FuTuRoLoGiSt LOL!!!!!!!!

      Absent family will join the celebrations virtually. There might be technology allowing us to read each others minds and being able to know what others are thinking may not always add peace and harmony to the celebrations.

      ROFL AWESOME!!!!!

    24. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to rain on your parade, but he died around 2000 yrs ago. Thus my statement is made in the past tense, not the present.

      You might want to work on that reading ability before you trapse off with the head bashing hobby, lest you bash a head that does not deserve it. Don't get me wrong, many do deserve a good head bashing, but your ignorance does not equate to their culpability.

      Montag

    25. Re:Old news by RKloti · · Score: 1

      Yes, but The Fifth Element had a stylised, rather unrealistic version of the future. The cars could fly, but their chassis looked old fashioned even by today's standards. Surely a flying car wouldn'd look like a 60s gas guzzler without the wheels. The buildings, too, despite being far higher than today's skyscrapers, were not the steel prisms with glass façades that modern high rises have, but rather the older style with lots of concrete and smaller windows.

      One must remember that with technological change comes also cultural change.

    26. Re:Old news by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      Am I the only person out there that would buy a little personal robot for something like feeding the cats?

      Yes. The rest of us would be using our personal robots to take over, if not the world, then at least the neighborhood.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    27. Re:Old news by blissful+ignorant · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anybody read history?

      Technology has been creating job shortages since the Industrial Revolution began over 200 years ago in Britain. New jobs are always created.

      Malthus thought Britain was over-populated in 1798, when the population was around 9 million people. Today it's at nearer to 59 million people. The lesson: there's always more space for people than you think there is.

      Also, more people = more consumers = more job opportunities. What you mean to say is that we have too many poor people, but the problem there is wealth distribution, not too many people.

      I don't know how people make comments like "But there's literally no place left for us to go." The Earth is huge, and there's tons of vast empty space. Anarctica? Why not Kansas?

      --
      Valete!
    28. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming he ever lived, prophecy says he's coming back. Speaking of reading ability, perhaps you should've read the whole thread? It started with a guy's sig that said "Jesus drives a dodge" or something like that.

  5. vegans by in_ur_face · · Score: 2, Funny

    "thanks to progress in biology and nanotechnology, the molecular processes needed to convert raw materials into turkey will be understood sufficiently well to make a good artificial turkey for the vegetarians."

    thats great, a few of my friends are vegan and I always which they could have a little more then tofurkey!!!

    i wonder when we will have replicators :) Then i can finally cook real meals for myself!

    1. Re:vegans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey man, i sell frozen food.
      you have no idea how many tofurkeys i've been slinging the last month.

  6. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and just how are we going to have Christmas in another 48 years if Bush, Saddam, North Korea, et al. are just itching for a nuclear holocaust...?

    Yah...it'll be a white christmas....but I don't think the fourteen living bacteria will really give a damn... =P

    1. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt north korean or iraqi half ass nukes can wipe out an ant hill, let alone civilization!

  7. Buzzword city. by Max+Threshold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Will we even remember what half this crap is in 2050?

    1. Re:Buzzword city. by nickyj · · Score: 1

      I am sure we'll remember what 'crap' is. It's been with us for soo long.

      --
      Causing Chaos Everywhere,
      Nik J.
      The strange world of a loner, in a populous city, drowning in society
  8. christmas in 2002 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    christmas is 2002 is natalie portman with hot grits down my pants in sw-ep3

  9. AMD symbol? by MxReb0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So what does all these Popular Science-like predictions have to do with AMD?

    --

    MAKE YOUR TIME
    1. Re:AMD symbol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's gonna burn up really fast if you don't have a fan on it?

    2. Re:AMD symbol? by schmink182 · · Score: 1
      I too was wondering this, but then I realized it's Slashdot :)

      Seriously though, maybe it just hadn't come up in a while and Timothy missed it.

    3. Re:AMD symbol? by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 2

      Simple, everyone knows that in 2050 AMD will control every aspect of our lives. If one dares to question the authority of the great AMD there could be severe reprecussions.

    4. Re:AMD symbol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what will my stock be worth by then?

    5. Re:AMD symbol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll definitely reach that all-time two dollar high we've all been waiting for!

    6. Re:AMD symbol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not relevant because by then you will have sold back all your stock to AMD for $0.00001 per share at the persistant urging of a 315 pound Latvian thug named 'The Hammer'. (And you thought Hammer was just the codename for their 64-bit processor didn't you...)

  10. Where are the spaceships, flying cars, etc? by mesocyclone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I was a kid in the '50s, the futurists predicted routine space travel by now, commuting by flying automobiles, the hyrdrogen economy, copious nuclear power production, intelligent robots, oh - and the end of the world by nuclear war.

    Hmmm...

    And they missed the information age, microchips, the sexual revolution, the civil rights movement, the air bag in cars, AIDS, velcro and genetic engineering.

    So much for futurists.

    --

    The only good weather is bad weather.

    1. Re:Where are the spaceships, flying cars, etc? by ThinkingGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As I believe Scott Adams has pointed out, predictions of future technological advances usually miss the unintended side effects. For example, the growth of Internet and the World Wide Web has brought quick access to vast amounts of information and knowledge, but has also brought us junk e-mail, pop-ups, patent abuses (Amazon). So what will Christmas 2050 bring? Here are a couple of random thoughts...
      Currently kids have to wait to open their presents while dad checks his digital camera|video camera. In 2050, they'll be waiting while he hooks up everyone's head-mounted stim-sim recorders - "to capture the moment."
      There's been talk lately of "intelligent paper" and "flexible displays." Extrapolating this forward, I'd expect your Christmas presents in 2050 to require you to watch a commercial before you can open them.

    2. Re:Where are the spaceships, flying cars, etc? by geek · · Score: 2

      Honestly, it will never happen. The potential for dropping missiles on enemy heads is to great for casual commercial/private space travel. Just about every mission that goes up is tracked heavily by the worlds super powers and often documented for their review to make sure nukes aren't being aimed at them.

      Perhaps thousands of years from now when we have evolved into a more compassionate race, capable of getting past such things. You wont see it any time soon however. People are far to paranoid.

    3. Re:Where are the spaceships, flying cars, etc? by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 2

      And they missed the information age, microchips, the sexual revolution, the civil rights movement, the air bag in cars, AIDS, velcro and genetic engineering.

      You forgot Linux ;)

    4. Re:Where are the spaceships, flying cars, etc? by jedrek · · Score: 2

      People are far to paranoid.

      To paraphrase Henry Kissinger, 'even the paranoid have enemies'. In every government on earth, people are paid to know. They're paid to know what's going on in their country and in other countries. It's because they make decissions, and knowledge is needed to be able to make good decisions.

      It's their job, it what they're paid to do. It's what we, as taxpayers, pay them to do. Could you imagine the outcry if New York got nuked because someone decided that checking out other countries' space travel wasn't important?

    5. Re:Where are the spaceships, flying cars, etc? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      When I was a kid in the '50s, the futurists predicted routine space travel by now, commuting by flying automobiles, the hyrdrogen economy, copious nuclear power production, intelligent robots, oh - and the end of the world by nuclear war.


      we didnt miss the mark on any of these..

      space travel... it's being done.. you can go too! you just dont have $23,000,000 to give the russkies do you...

      flying cars... no problem there.... the reason we dont have them is because 98% of the population is too stupid to handle the current 2 dimensional ground based vehicles... why in the world would you want any of them to have anything that flies? you dont have flying cars because the masses are too fricking stupid to operate one safely.

      Nuclear power production... we have it! only the idiot tree-huggers here in the states killed this ultra-clean power source.. (yes it is ultra clean... you can take the waste of the reactor and run a breeder reactor with it) france and many other countries aren't as blind and idiotic as the United states and have embraced nuclear power very well.

      Robots... we got em! intelligent? no... not yet.

      end of the world by nuclear war.... hey. you just wait.... some of these lunatic groups from the middle east or south asia will gladly nuke the hell out of new york or Washington.. and if you think that GW wont gladly drop one back in their lap? all it takes is one lunatic with a black market russian nuke.. just wait it'll happen within the next 15-20 years.

      they weren't off by much, the "furutists" did not take into the stupidity factor of the human race.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Where are the spaceships, flying cars, etc? by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

      And who would have predicted that many of us today would be spending more on information than electricity? I know I am. And I include things like broadband, satellite tv, cable, telephone, etc.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  11. But why AMD? by dido · · Score: 2

    Why is the article icon AMD's? I don't see any relation to the scrappy little semiconductor company in any of this. If anything, I would expect that we'd have the Christmas Tree icon here, or the Technology icon.

    --
    Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    1. Re:But why AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There has to be something about this article to inspire some user comments.

    2. Re:But why AMD? by yamcha666 · · Score: 1

      I think the editors had a few too many glasses of Egg Nog this Christmas days so they might be having trouble telling the difference between Tux and the Microsoft butterfly...

  12. family feuds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine the family feuds that would result from being "switched off".

    "Honest Aunt Louise! Our personal cold fusion power generation unit failed. We didn't mean to disappear you!" .SIG: Doggone it... what was that username again...

  13. Consumption fever? by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    just as this Christmas was hijacked by a consumption fever,

    Makes it sound like they're comparing Christmas to tuberculosis or something.

    1. Re:Consumption fever? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      Never mind that retailers are struggling to break even with sales results from the previous year. What ever "fever" exists is in the mind of Makarand and whatever anti-corporate bias he harbors. The little money being spent is coming from folks just happy to be employed.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  14. However... by Cognitive+Dissident · · Score: 1

    When the process is discovered for creating artificial foods is invented, the discovering coproration (it'll have to be a corporation) will patent all known foods and we'll have to eat generic, tastless goop like the astronauts in the 2001 movie or pay license fees for every meal.

    1. Re:However... by yddeh · · Score: 1

      Have you ever heard of gardening? You can actually grow your own food! Go outside, look around. Maybe even talk to some folks. Better yet, do a google search.

    2. Re:However... by Alexei · · Score: 2, Funny

      Gardening? You mean, using an analog method to bypass Mom's Friendly Food Co's copyright on the products of their patented Food(r) process? You're lucky I don't notify the FBI!

  15. not going to work by Rambo,+John+J. · · Score: 1

    Thanks to progress in biology and nanotechnology, the molecular processes needed to convert raw materials into turkey will be understood sufficiently well to make a good artificial turkey for the vegetarians.

    In reference to the "trianglature formula," it states simply: "sqrt (pi) times diameter of circle gives a triangle with precisely the same area as that of the given circle, where triangle base is circle diameter."

    The formula by itself merely confirms the centuries old quadrature formula which "squares" the circle. Heat of the controversy is over the accompanying statement that either formula (squaring or triangulating) shows the ratio of pi to be arbitrary, which smacks in the face of the longheld academic assertion that the traditional pi is sacrosanct.

    This causes huge problems with technology when it comes to developing AI (eg, robots) or even a synthetic turkey, what people arent aware of is that sythetic turkeye could not be exactly replicated the same time, leaving certain mutations.

    Oviously, the harmless ones could be a pigment splotch or a cosmetic defect, but imagine a more serious one of note such as something similiar to anthrax, bubonic plague, or something WORSE.

  16. In 2nd Grade by Apreche · · Score: 2

    I remember when I was in second grade. They told us we were going to be the class of 2000. They made us do a little project on what we thought the world would be like in 2000. I did my project on flying cars. I made a car that transformed from wheels to wings with construx. And the class was pretty unanimous on moving sidewalks. Guess what, it's not the jetsons, but it is the internet.
    Predicting the future is fun, but I'd put more stake in science fiction becoming true than what any official predictor says.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:In 2nd Grade by Knife_Edge · · Score: 2

      I was also a member of the mythical class of 2000. One thing I remember from grade school is the emphasis that was being placed on the enviromental movement. I really stuck with me when a textbook or handout or something insisted that if oil consumption continued to rise at the current rate, there would be no oil right about now. That was the theme, 'We are running out of oil, and cars in the future will certainly not use it.' We spent a lot of time discussing alternative energy of various varieties. Back then the major idea seemed to be solar panels. Flash forward to the present, when the major alternative energy source (at least in terms of how many megawatts generated from it) now seems to be wind power. However, fossil fuels are still in copious supply at low prices. I am enthusiastic to point this out because it is the only major prediction I have seen made by people who seemed to know what they were doing that I have thus far lived long enough to realize the falsity of.

    2. Re:In 2nd Grade by Moridineas · · Score: 2

      Word up class of 2000 mate!

      We are the smoke-free class of 2000
      Two triple zero, everyone's a hero!


      I remember reading a book in elementary school that said "In 10 years we will all have robot helpers, able to carry objects about the house for us" etc, and showed a picture of something that looked suspiciously like R2 D2 :p

    3. Re:In 2nd Grade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cripes, they were spewing the same bullshit at us kids in the 70's. I remember predictions that we'd be out of oil by 1985. And they were STILL saying that in 1990? Do these people actually believe their own lies?

  17. gobble gobble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally, I don't think vegetarians would eat synthetic turkey for the same reason they don't eat real turkey. "Real turkey" is not consumed by vegetarians because the molecules in it were once part of lovong turkeys. Raw materials (dirt? grass? water?) no doubt took on many forms in the past. Many of the molecules comprising those raw materials could easily have once been part of turkeys (and thinking back to high school chemistry and avogadro's number which wa something like 10 to the 23th power it's pretty much a certainty) so vegetarians shun synthetic turkey just as much as the real thing. Also, how do you think they make sure it tastes like real turkey? Why, they compare it, which means that lots of real turkeys died so that the synthetic kind could taste more like them. QED

    1. Re:gobble gobble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the fact that the plants they're eating are also raw materials, and therefore have turkey molecules also.

    2. Re:gobble gobble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call that cannibalism!!

    3. Re:gobble gobble by yddeh · · Score: 1

      There already exist turkey "substitutes" that sell very well. Blows my mind because I ate vegan for the longest time and never found myself craving something that resembled turkey. But they exist, and sell well. Tofurky, Now and Zen's Unturky and the latest offering from Quorn which makes their non-vegan meats out of mold. no joke.

    4. Re:gobble gobble by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Yes, they exist. They also taste nothing like turkey and are far more expensive.

      We cooked for ~100 people for Thanksgiving, got turkeys for 95 people for about $25 (good deal) - then had to get a $20 tofurkey for the 5 vegans.

      Grr.

    5. Re:gobble gobble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The easy solution, of course, was to just eat the vegans. THat would've saved you both the $20 you spent on their turkey and the $25 you spent on everybody else's turkey.

      And what's with this Slow Down Cowboy shit? WTF makes him think I'm a cowboy? I live in fuckin' Seattle, dude! I realize the place smells like cowshit (especially the closer you get to Redmond), but that does NOT make ME a cowboy! I don't need to slow down, slashdot needs to speed up.

    6. Re:gobble gobble by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Offer lots of vegitable and salad, thay don't like it, they don't have to come back next year.

      If they want to be vegans, fine, but there is no use forcing other people for there decsision.
      Remeber Vegans are OK, disrespectfull vegans can suck ass.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:gobble gobble by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      The easy solution, of course, was to just eat the vegans.

      Save a vegetable, eat a vegetarian.

      Yeah, we thought about that, but the University probably wouldn't have liked us doing it... ;-)

  18. If I hear another by ericdano · · Score: 3
    If I hear another thing about the retailers suffering I'll vomit. Christmas is not about buying stuff and giving it to other people. It's about family and friends and good times. Why should that entail buying like $1K worth of gifts for everyone?

    Why not be nice and give gifts to people who need/deserve them throughout the year?

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:If I hear another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why not be nice and give gifts to people who need/deserve them throughout the year?"

      Excellent point. I give a measly 3 weekends a year for volunteer work at a mission soup kitchen, often paying for the food we serve. My way of doing something, no matter how small. The US Marine Corps has it's Toys for Tots campaign each year and I donate new, unopened gifts to those people. Reuseable toys, like footballs, basket balls and frisbee's. They can be handed down to others. Recycle, I say. Plastic junk toys, like pose-able action figures are not on my list. Battery operated anything is not on my list. I donate school supplies at the beginning of each school year.

      Christmas should be a time for thinking about each other, and ridiculing Microsoft. Let's get our priorities straight.

  19. Never ceases to amaze me. by tgrotvedt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How people always predict these whacky cliched technology innovations for the fairly near future, and nothing of the sort is ever created. Mind reading machines? I hate to sound like the guy who used to think the worl was flat, or the guy that said we would never go to the moon, but come on.

    New technology is far more likely to be very sensible, merely adding more "grunt" to what we have already, with a few sub-innovations here and ithere. As a people we are already discovering what we want; Fast data communications, medcine, digitalization, AI (a huge umbrella), time savers, entertainment etc.

    Let's start being more specific, choose certain already established technology and predict where it will go. All tyhe best technology evolves from working with what we have. We should try and built the bridges before we try to cross them.

    *sigh* I've began to sound like a whining, ranting Slashdotter more every day.

    --
    What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
    1. Re:Never ceases to amaze me. by tgrotvedt · · Score: 2
      AI (a huge umbrella)

      That's right, I want an artificially intelligent, extremely large sheltering device. Got a problem with that?

      --
      What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
    2. Re:Never ceases to amaze me. by salientpoints · · Score: 1

      That's right, I want an artificially intelligent, extremely large sheltering device. Got a problem with that?

      I've got an uber fat friend I could give to you (for christmas perahps?). I'd call him artificially intelligent, too.

  20. and still... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In-laws that aren't quite clued in will still give out
    smelly, rash-on-contact soaps as table gifts, and
    chortle at their own inability to set the time on their
    home replicator to anything other than a
    flashing 12:00.. and will still try to call you
    into the study to "have a look at my Windows '49er..
    it keeps crashing...."

  21. Read each other's thoughts??? Ugh! by phillymjs · · Score: 3, Funny

    There might be technology allowing us to read each others minds...

    Great... I can envision myself being bankrupted the first time I get a song stuck in my head for an entire day-- because I'm sure the RIAA will buy the laws to make them privy to my thoughts, and will demand a licensing fee for each separate instance that I thought about the song.

    ~Philly

  22. In The Year 2525 by SpaceRook · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Zager Evans
    In The Year 2525

    In the year 2525
    If man is still alive
    If woman can survive
    They may find

    In the year 3535
    Ain't gonna need to tell the truth, tell no lies
    Everything you think, do, and say
    Is in the pill you took today

    In the year 4545
    Ain't gonna need your teeth, won't need your eyes
    You won't find a thing chew
    Nobody's gonna look at you

    In the year 5555
    Your arms are hanging limp at your sides
    Your legs got not nothing to do
    Some machine is doing that for you

    In the year 6565
    Ain't gonna need no husband, won't need no wife
    You'll pick your son, pick your daughter too
    From the bottom of a long glass tube

    In the year 7510
    If God's a-comin' he ought to make it by then
    Maybe he'll look around himself and say
    Guess it's time for the Judgement day

    In the year 8510
    God is gonna shake his mighty head
    He'll either say I'm pleased where man has been
    Or tear it down and start again

    In the year 9595
    I'm kinda wondering if man is gonna be alive
    He's taken everything this old earth can give
    And he ain't put back nothing

    Now it's been 10,000 years
    Man has cried a billion tears
    For what he never knew
    Now man's reign is through
    But through the eternal night
    The twinkling of starlight
    So very far away
    Maybe it's only yesterday

    In the year 2525
    If man is still alive
    If woman can survive
    They may find

    In the year 3535
    Ain't gonna need to tell the truth, tell no lies
    Everything you think, do or say
    Is in the pill you took today ....(fading...)

    1. Re:In The Year 2525 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I take this for granted
      With your eyes over me?
      In this place
      This wintery home
      I know there's always someone in

      Sexcrime
      Sexcrime
      Nineteen eighty four

      And so I face the wall
      Turn my back against it all
      How I wish I'd been unborn
      Wish I was unliving here

      Sexcrime
      Sexcrime
      Nineteen eighty four

      I'll pull the bricks down
      One by one
      Leave a big hole in the wall
      Just where you are looking in

  23. An AMD Christmas by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1
    Lastly, just as this Christmas was hijacked by a consumption fever, so too in 2050, Christmas will be all about presents.

    The stockings were hung by the chimney with care
    In hopes that AMD-powered 1-terahertz PCs might soon be there.

    It's all about the (theoretical) presents, indeed. :)

  24. Taking the piss? by psyconaut · · Score: 2

    Doesn't it seem like Ian Pearson gets to take the piss at BT (and our) expense?

    -psy

  25. join us virtually? by loconet · · Score: 2

    "Absent family will join the celebrations virtually."

    Why join us virtually? They should be able to join us virtually becuase they'll "fly" here with their flying cars right? ......right? :( I want flying cars that everyone will be able to afford already! , No, I don't care about traffic or people not being able to fly them properly, I want the flying cars I was promised!

    psst.. wake up, wake up!

    --
    [alk]
    1. Re:join us virtually? by adpowers · · Score: 2

      It's kind of hard to take a flying car to your relatives' house when you are living in a colony on the moon!

  26. Flying cars... by Spoons · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Don't forget the flying cars! What good is one of these "predict the future" pieces of crap without some of those?!?!

  27. In the year 2050... by I+Want+GNU! · · Score: 2

    CmdrTaco, Jr., is now 40 years old and running Slashdot. He posts repeat stories using his Linux Tablet PC, which is of course illegal since Linux's source code compromises Intellectual Property. All of the major companies have merged into a single company which most people believe runs the country. George Bush, IV, along with "Lil" Fritz Hollings pass a law mandating quotas of consumer involvement. The war on terror has not ended but that's ok since the country has rallied behind mini-Bush.

    Ahh, what days lie ahead. I can't wait!

  28. It may not be there... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 0, Troll

    Christmas will be replaced by a generic winter holiday after lawsuits charge it with Eurocentricism and racist undertones (why isn't Santa black?). "Christian" preachers will tell their congregations to embrace the new holiday, as to not offend their atheist, Muslim, Jewish, Pagan, Hindu, and Buddhist brethe--- er, fellow human beings.


    Underground real Christians will continue to celebrate, while having what nativity scenes they dare display be subjected to fines and arson.



    "O! Beautiful for spacious skies..."



    Don't see this as offtopic. Sadly, I'm partly serious about this. I'm willing to wager that Christmas WILL be less evident in 40 years if things keep up this way.

    1. Re:It may not be there... by yddeh · · Score: 1

      I don't see it as offtopic. I'm not sure I believe you're partly serious about it. I do believe you think you're funny but I guess I have no sense of humor.

    2. Re:It may not be there... by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

      Such a thing will only happen with the consent of all involved, including said "celebrators" of Christmas.

      --

      What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    3. Re:It may not be there... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      That's the sad part, many Christians are content to sit down and watch their traditions be derided. It's one thing to respect other cultures. It's another to stand aside while people try to destroy yours. Look in NYC, you can have Ramadan and Hanukkah celebrations in school, but not Christmas. That's endorsement of religion, and an instance where the Christian majority sits down and takes it.

    4. Re:It may not be there... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      I am quite serious, though I'm exaggerating for effect (and maybe humor too...). I seriously think the majority of "Christendom" would be willing to ignore (and is ignoring) attempts to marginalize the celebration of Christmas.

    5. Re:It may not be there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm torn about your post, because on the one hand I'd LOVE it if Christmas were a bit more sedate. One thing that pisses me off about Christians in general is their attitude as a group that I have to respect it. I'm sorry, but stupid is stupid and I will not respect it. Christmas belongs in the dark ages, let's put it back there.

      On the other hand, I want to see Christmas fade away as part of society's natural evolution forward. If Christmas is made illegal in any form because of some nut calling it racist or any of the other things you mentioned in your post, then society will not have moved forward, and may have taken (yet another) step back.

      Finally, to put this post back on topic :) I have to say that these seers can just pack up and go. Before you can predict the future you have to have both a sense of the present and a sense of practicality.

      Mind-reading machines, IMHO, would be a huge violation of privacy to use. They would require a search warrant to be used on citizens by the police, and the government (read: CIA and military) would use them wantonly on anybody that came along (let's get that sweet old lady! She ain't so sweet!). Assuming, of course, that the mind-reading machine is developed in a free society. More likely we'd be in a police state which may very well prohibit large gatherings of any kind, thus preventing any family Christmas celebrations in any case.

      When you dream up a neat-sounding gadget (I don't think a mind-reading machine sounds neat, I think it sounds repulsive), consider it's effects on society before determining that everyone would have one. We all have cars because cars are a logical progression from horses. We do NOT have flying cars because the necessary safeguards have not been built. However, cars that can fly *have* been built, and with our current technology we can probably even build a car that can fly and drive on the road.

      Oh yeah, and he probably didn't predict flying cars because he wanted credibility.

      Take your soothsaying back to Delphi and leave us alone. (I did try to avoid any possible geek-based pun so I deleted Oracle, but had to leave Delphi. Sorry)

      *not logged in*
      fucksl4shdot

    6. Re:It may not be there... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      I'm torn about your post, because on the one hand I'd LOVE it if Christmas were a bit more sedate. One thing that pisses me off about Christians in general is their attitude as a group that I have to respect it. I'm sorry, but stupid is stupid and I will not respect it. Christmas belongs in the dark ages, let's put it back there.



      First off, when you think of Christians as a group, you're thinking of Fundamentalist Christians. Who, in my opinion, betrays Christianity, and most certainly doesn't represent the fundamentals of the Faith. Christmas doesn't belong in the Dark Ages, it's underlying message will continue to live.



      On the other hand, I want to see Christmas fade away as part of society's natural evolution forward. If Christmas is made illegal in any form because of some nut calling it racist or any of the other things you mentioned in your post, then society will not have moved forward, and may have taken (yet another) step back.

      Actually, you've made me think here. Maybe Christmas fading away would be beneficiary. It would strip the fluff off and leave only it's reason for existing- that we chose a day to celebrate the birth of our King. I admit it'd be a step back to ban it (or any other holiday), because that harkens back to the bad old days of cultural exclusivism.



    7. Re:It may not be there... by yddeh · · Score: 1

      disclaimer: i'm not a troll

      but ummmmmmmm
      wtf are you talking about?

    8. Re:It may not be there... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about how people are willing to ignore that Christmas is being attacked. In fact, not just Christmas, but Christendom.



      I'll illustrate for you: During the Israeli siege of the Church of the Nativity, the Palestinian militants inside drank the communion wine (even though they were Muslims!), stole gold crucifixes, used the Bible as toliet paper... Yet we hear little about this, and we don't complain about this desecration. Now, imagine American's even allowing themselves to be besieged in a Mosque. Now, this says two things: 1) Christianity is sleeping, 2) Christianity is more mature than Islam (which isn't saying much, we're still in our infancy too).

    9. Re:It may not be there... by The+Cydonian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Strangely enough, the Hindu far-right also talks of Hindu festivals such as Deepavali, Dussehra becoming extinct in the face of relentless evangelisation from the Christian far-right. And they, indeed, echo the Muslim far-right's concerns over young Muslim girls not wearing hijab, eating non-haleem meat, not celebrating Id-ul-Fitr with "proper" gaiety...

      Face it; it's not just (underground real) Christians under "threat".

    10. Re:It may not be there... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Wee heee, now I'm logged in! :)

      First off, when you think of Christians as a group, you're thinking of

      I'm a free man, so please don't tell me what to think. I know what I'm thinking.

      I've been mistreated (and in many cases downright persecuted) since the age of 12 for not being a Christian (that being the age I left the church, and it was a so-called liberal church). This has come from all corners, and I can honestly say that the only Christians who have NOT mistreated me have been so few that I can count them with my pants down, my shoes on, and my hands in my pockets. (yeah, just one) He was just as sickened with organized religion as I was.

      Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not down about it, and I'm certainly not trying to whine about "Gee, my life has sucked so bad because of Christians" because it HAS NOT. I fought back whenever it was necessary, and generally did what was needed. I'm a FREE MAN, and most of these Christians who have behaved towards me in a non-free fashion are NOT free because they're enthralled by their scapegoat religion.

      Now, I realize I'm generalizing. I'm generalizing based on experience, and it usually proves accurate, HOWEVER I know that actual mileage will vary, and this doesn't necessarily reflect the actual behavior of all Christians.

      Actually, you've made me think here. Maybe Christmas fading away would be beneficiary. It would strip the fluff off and leave only it's reason for existing- that we chose a day to celebrate the birth of our King. I admit it'd be a step back to ban it (or any other holiday), because that harkens back to the bad old days of cultural exclusivism.

      I'm glad you mentioned this, because my #1 problem with Christmas (because the pure hypocrisy involved in having a one special day where we're good to people and then act shitty to each other year round) is the fact that so many people don't agree what it's about. This is besides the typical "It's not about receiving, it's about giving" argument. This is stuff like the signs that say "Happy Birthday Jesus!" followed by someone (wearing a cross dangling form their ear) saying "You should celebrate Christmas even if you think Christ was a prick because everybody's doing it" followed by "Just because everybody's doing it doesn't mean you should shoot heroin".

      If Christmas is supposed to be based on family traditions, then let families celebrate it in their traditional families, let those of use who prefer to sacrifice goats and pigs and stuff (like all people who don't celebrate christmas do) do so in our own traditional way, and most importantly, can we all just SHUT THE FUCK UP about it?

      Sorry for the rant. Christmas sucks.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    11. Re:It may not be there... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      Well, the Hindus are in problems not related to missionary work (there's been quite a bit written on this, defections from the upper castes and such), and we all know that many Muslims are radicalized to where they see threats everywhere (so are many Christians). I'm just painting a legitimate concern, becuase Christians (for fear of offending others) are letting their traditions be run roughshod.

      I have to say seeing a menorah in a shop window has never bothered me. But people are afraid a creche will.

    12. Re:It may not be there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christiandom? It's called "Christianity", you stupid, illiterate fuck. And fuck Christianity and every other fairy tale religion which is holding back the progress of humanity with their brainwashing of the gullible.

    13. Re:It may not be there... by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

      What's really sad is that the reason we celebrate Christmas is lost even on many churchgoers. When I went to church with my family this Christmas Eve, half the congregation left right after communion, before the service was over. Rightfully so, I'm sure many of them will tell you, since it's the 'busiest time of the year'. A message of the true purpose of Christmas must permeate the churches and their attendees before our society as a whole might actually understand that Christmas was originally intended to be something more than time for gifts and beer.

      I sometimes wonder why our society hasn't adopted December 25 as a non-religiously affiliated holiday intended for gift-giving. I fear that it will probably happen. Perhaps they'll call it Decemberween.

      --
      Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    14. Re:It may not be there... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      many Christians are content to sit down and watch their traditions be derided.

      After Christianity has stomped on nearly every single tradition it's ever come across, and assimilated the rest, I find ithard to believe we're supposed to feel sorry about it. Payback's a bitch, and karma is real.

      Note: The Salem Witch Trials happened in AMERICA, and I can speak from personal experience when I say that Christianity is NOT in a position EVEN NOW to be demanding respect in return for their actions. It would be like complaining that the Apaches came out of the hills and started taking land from the rest of the country and relocating the existing occupants.

      Basic problem is that Christianity is a scapegoat religion. If you are a Christian, you can do whatever you want to whomever you want, so long as you beg forgiveness from the almighty. If you don't beg forgiveness, you won't see punishment until the afterlife.

      For the rest of us, our punishment is HERE and NOW, so we must be responsible for our own actions, and we don't have a scapegoat.

      Look in NYC, you can have Ramadan and Hanukkah celebrations in school, but not Christmas

      This is a problem, for sure. However, it wasn't until recently that it was possible to go to school without saying the Lord's prayer in any case. Furthermore, all kids are required (I went through this in school, and it *is* a requirement) to say the Pledge of Defeatism, er, Allegiance, and to give your soul to the state, and since this is "one nation under god", that's religion in school. So take care of yourself, live up to the standards you're having trouble with, and THEN FIGHT BACK. I.e. make sure Christianity isn't in schools anymore, and then complain about the other religions being there.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    15. Re:It may not be there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It already has become a generic winter holiday. I have a lot of non-Christian friends who celebrate Christmas.

    16. Re:It may not be there... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      I'm a free man, so please don't tell me what to think. I know what I'm thinking.

      I meant to have a maybe in there, I apoligize.

      I've been mistreated (and in many cases downright persecuted) since the age of 12 for not being a Christian (that being the age I left the church, and it was a so-called liberal church). This has come from all corners, and I can honestly say that the only Christians who have NOT mistreated me have been so few that I can count them with my pants down, my shoes on, and my hands in my pockets. (yeah, just one) He was just as sickened with organized religion as I was.

      That's sad. I was an atheist for some time, and leaving the organized religion at 15 (for what I hope is only a vacation until I'm ready to find a church that I can worship in) it was the best thing that happened to me. I didn't get any grief for leaving, and I'm sorry you did.

      Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not down about it, and I'm certainly not trying to whine about "Gee, my life has sucked so bad because of Christians" because it HAS NOT. I fought back whenever it was necessary, and generally did what was needed. I'm a FREE MAN, and most of these Christians who have behaved towards me in a non-free fashion are NOT free because they're enthralled by their scapegoat religion.

      Christians should be the most free people on Earth. The worst are those who submit their wills to temporal authorties like pastors, parents, or the Southern Baptist Convention. Christianity is about freedom in God's will ("It is for Freedom that Christ Jesus set you Free").

      That said, I hope you will learn that there are more Christians out there like your friend. Like Kierkegaard said, there are very few Christians in all of Christendom. And, there are no perfect ones, because it's impossible to do so.

      Now, I realize I'm generalizing. I'm generalizing based on experience, and it usually proves accurate, HOWEVER I know that actual mileage will vary, and this doesn't necessarily reflect the actual behavior of all Christians.

      I appreciate this, especially with the trolling comment I got under one reply in this thread.

      I'm glad you mentioned this, because my #1 problem with Christmas (because the pure hypocrisy involved in having a one special day where we're good to people and then act shitty to each other year round) is the fact that so many people don't agree what it's about. This is besides the typical "It's not about receiving, it's about giving" argument. This is stuff like the signs that say "Happy Birthday Jesus!" followed by someone (wearing a cross dangling form their ear) saying "You should celebrate Christmas even if you think Christ was a prick because everybody's doing it" followed by "Just because everybody's doing it doesn't mean you should shoot heroin".

      Forcing people to celebrate Christmas is a great hipocrisy, made worse because it turns people away. Besides, it earns them no points to force people into something they do not believe for the sake of "culture".

      Thanks for the interesting conversation,

      Kyle

    17. Re:It may not be there... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      After Christianity has stomped on nearly every single tradition it's ever come across, and assimilated the rest, I find ithard to believe we're supposed to feel sorry about it. Payback's a bitch, and karma is real.

      Two wrongs...

      Note: The Salem Witch Trials happened in AMERICA, and I can speak from personal experience when I say that Christianity is NOT in a position EVEN NOW to be demanding respect in return for their actions. It would be like complaining that the Apaches came out of the hills and started taking land from the rest of the country and relocating the existing occupants.

      Since the Salem Witch trials were about local feuding abusing Ecclesiastical law, they have little to do with Christianity, and everything to do with spite and greed.

      Actually, if the Apaches did that, people WOULD be in a position to complain, whether you or I agree or not. I personally think we owe the tribes ndependent nations for their prior strife.

      Basic problem is that Christianity is a scapegoat religion. If you are a Christian, you can do whatever you want to whomever you want, so long as you beg forgiveness from the almighty. If you don't beg forgiveness, you won't see punishment until the afterlife.

      Excuse my French, but that's grade-A bullshit. You cannot(!) do "whatever you want" as a Christian. If you consciously act against the Law of Love with just asking for forgiveness in mind, you have committed a sin deeper than your act. You have tried to manipulate and cheapen God's Mercy. Not that Christians cannot sin (in fact, it is very very hard to sin no more!), but they most certainly should not with forgiveness in mind. This kind of thinking among "Christians" is a side effect of institutionalized, forced Christianity.

      This is a problem, for sure. However, it wasn't until recently that it was possible to go to school without saying the Lord's prayer in any case. Furthermore, all kids are required (I went through this in school, and it *is* a requirement) to say the Pledge of Defeatism, er, Allegiance, and to give your soul to the state, and since this is "one nation under god", that's religion in school. So take care of yourself, live up to the standards you're having trouble with, and THEN FIGHT BACK. I.e. make sure Christianity isn't in schools anymore, and then complain about the other religions being there.

      The pledge should not be a requirement. I'm against it on the grounds that it's forcing children to make an oath that they cannot even comprehend, and I don't see the point. I'd rather children sing the national anthem or something in the mornings instead.

    18. Re:It may not be there... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      Christendom ( P ) Pronunciation Key (krsn-dm)

      n.

      Christians considered as a group.

      The Christian world.

      You stupid, illiterate troll.

  29. I heard this too by gabec · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... but when i saw it, it was on a "Popular Science" short from 1960 about how we'd be living in 1990. :P

  30. Robin? by Grip3n · · Score: 4, Funny

    A robotic kitchen assistant will help you with the Christmas meal preparations while you recieve instructions and monitoring assistance in real time from information systems for the cooking.

    But will he look like Robin Williams?

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
    1. Re:Robin? by davey_darling · · Score: 1
      What the hell does Mrs. Doubtfire have to do with robotic kitchen helpers?

    2. Re:Robin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bicentennial Man, you twit

  31. Prediction. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's 2050, and was promised flying turkeys. Where are my flying turkeys?

  32. fuck that hippy noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you god damned tree hugging dirty ape!

  33. Past and Future by Rambo,+John+J. · · Score: 1

    By evaluating and studying the past you can deduce alot of information about where we are headed, there are guys that are paid to do this.

    After reading the article I whipped up a quick little formula that would say, help studying the past and future of our current economic system.

    You could use this to find several useful things and reverse the formula to see what may be projected, (barring a future disaster that would take the stock market into a depression or something) economists do this all the time.

    The exact formula is

    DT = log(2)/log(1+p/100)

    where p is the percentage increase per unit time. Thus, in your
    example, p=7, so 1+p/100 = 1.07 and

    DT = log(2)/log(1.07) = 10.245 years

    However, this doesn't directly solve your problem, which says nothing
    about doubling time. Instead we can write this equation:

    C = 5(1.07)^t

    where C is the cost of a lift ticket and t is the number of years
    since 1963. Do you understand this equation? At t= 0 (the year 1963)
    the cost is $5:

    C = 5(1.07)^0
    = 5(1)

    At t = 1 (the year 1964) the cost is 1.07 times $5; that's an increase
    of 7%. Each year following, you multiply by another factor of 1.07.

    You can find the cost of a lift ticket in 1993 by deciding what the
    value of t is in that year, then plugging this value into the equation
    in place of t, and evaluating it to find C.

    Now, with this raw example you coud make what futurists call "forseeable return index" or commonly reffered as FRI.

    You can deduce apply to this the sales of the cable industry, airline industry, any industry.

    Apply your newly generated FRI and cross reference it with the stock market PAST performance, and, removing the wierd bizarre random happenings that made stock to plummet (enron, say a CEO was caught freebasing, etc), and then reversing it, you will have a ghastly close representation of how to play the market.

    Economists have been refining this for years. Their formulas are different then mine of course (and probably more complex!), but it doesn't have to apply to this one example, others could be things such as generating a loose time line of every automobile upgrade (introduction of anti-lock brakes, airbags, then say get a loose idea when something like a wheel turns into jet burner, etc). Moores law is a good example here.

    Just my thoughts.

  34. Wait a minute.... by saden1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I was promised a flying car 50 years ago...Where is my flying car? I want my flying car!!!

    --

    -----
    One is born into aristocracy, but mediocrity can only be achieved through hard work.
  35. Tech predictions ignore basic social change by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's amusing to see this sort of thing. Implicit are assumptions made about how current behavior will not change, but will itself be applied, or adopted wholesale, to new technology.
    This is, in fact, the reverse of what happens.

    We saw this sort of thing in the 50's with predictions about vacuum cleaner robots, almost always accompanied by an image of a very happy woman (assumed to be a housewife). No one could imagine the Women's Movement just one decade hence.

    We will (see Kurzweil) experience ever increasing rates of change in technology over the next 50 years; along with that will be slower (but faster than linear) changes in human behavior. The latter are the *really* hard predictions.

    One nice change might be to find a way to do away with the compulsive consumption (the latter word used to mean both "using things up" and "deadly disease") that defines our most popular holiday (in the West), and turn it into something more functional, useful, and fulfilling. (btw, all the latter adjectives imply massive behavior change as well, which might happen as the developed world begins to learn the lesson about what 'enough' is).

    In keeping with the season, here's 'Santabot' http://mywebpages.comcast.net/ctrevas/santabot.htm l getting ready to give a hearty "heave-ho,ho'ho" to most of the predictions in the reported article.

    1. Re:Tech predictions ignore basic social change by Mithy · · Score: 2

      We saw this sort of thing in the 50's with predictions about vacuum cleaner robots, almost always accompanied by an image of a very happy woman (assumed to be a housewife). No one could imagine the Women's Movement just one decade hence.

      Women's rights movements existed before the 60s. And while they were admirable, the contraceptive Pill did far more to liberate women than most of those movements ever could. It's no coincidence that Women's Lib really took off at the same time as the Pill.

      In other words, it was a social consequence of a technological breakthrough, and these can be predicted with slightly more ease than the arbitrary changes in society that occasionally (and often temporarily) occur.

      --

      --
      "This isn't the post you're looking for. Move along."
  36. In the year 2050 by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    Your mom will be asking when you are going to get a job and move the hell out of the basement.

    Virtual Hot Grits will be the to-get gift of the season.

    Linux will be ready for the desktop, but all the desktops will have shrunk to fit in a pill that you swallow.

    The entire B*ush family will have died from a drug overdose.

    Cheney's heart will continue beating in a small bell jar at the McDonalds Intel Smithsonian.

    Michael Jackson will have transparent skin, and have Liz Taylors uterus 'installed' to give birth to an endless stream of monkeys.

    Music will be beamed directly into your head, and tinfoil hats make a fashion comeback.

    Steven Speilbergs 'Taken' will be on its final installment.

    The music industry finally disposes with allusion and inference, and two new acts hit the stage: Britney Bigtits and the boy band "Humpin' Yer Daughters"

    Slashdot's Karma will actually apply to real life, and trolls are forced to live underground, cracking human bones for the tasty marrow inside.

    Reality shows will move into your own home, with prizes for the 'best'(dysfuntional) family.

    The first frozen dead guy is revived, and by an incredible twist of fate, is named 'Fry'.

    Dick Clark will be suspended in ammniotic fluid. Just for the hell of it.

    The U.S., long since disbanded for mismanagement, will relocate to Kamchaka, and attempt to defend all those borders.

    Steven King will be found dead in his home. Even if you didn't like his books, you have to admit the affect he had on late 20th century literature.

    Cmdr Taco's daughter will run Slashdot, and in hopes of giving her a better life than he had, he will buy her a dictionary chip.

    Go Carts will still be fun, but pale in comparison to GyroCarts which will be super strong, cool and powerful.

    Soviet Russia will be a new Disney/AOL/TimeWarner/Microsoft/RedHat theme park, where the attractions ride YOU. Ok. It's a whorehouse.

    Steve Balmer will live his dream, starring in "Gorillas in the Mist: Lard of the Jungle"

    Grand Theft Auto 2050 is released. It's not a game anymore.

    Duke Nukem (We Told Ya!) is finally released, and it like totally blows.

    1. Re:In the year 2050 by di0s · · Score: 1

      And last but not least:
      In the year 2050, all AC's will get a clue and post meaningful comments. Well, maybe that won't come true, but it's worth hoping for.

    2. Re:In the year 2050 by glwtta · · Score: 2
      Even if you didn't like his books, you have to admit the affect he had on late 20th century literature.

      Um, yeah... "literature".

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:In the year 2050 by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 1

      Not likely!

  37. why does anyone take this seriously? by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember back in the 40s-60s when people were promissing moon colonies by the year 2000? Perfect AI? All these promisses of self-aware kitchens, nanotechnology, and... ::chuckles:: mind reading with our family, and the greedy little grandsons i'm gonna have... they mean nothing to me. Just because some guy with money and a publisher came up with some ideas about the "future" from fitting a best-fit line on some innacurate graph... we should listen?

    Well here's my prediction.

    Christmas 2050:

    During the decades after the fallout of nuclear war from WWIII (thank's to our good ol' prez G.W. Bush), the remaining 20% of humanity will have finally learned from our mistakes in the past, and a mental enlightenment will take place. No more war, poverty, or even money to spoil our greedy hands at christmas. There will be no economy anymore... just a civilization where people do their job because it betters the world.

    Because of the lack of greed, the greatest minds no longer compete against eachother for grants, steal eachothers patents, or publish rediculous findings/theories just to make money... but instead will work together and finally discover a method of energy creation that is 100% efficient and very very powerful, allowing us to finally leave this polluted earth with no ozone and start again on a new planet under a distant sun after we have finally learned our lesson...

    ...and no one listens to "future" predictions anymore.

    In all seriousness, the roots of any technical breakthrough or future event is far... far to complex to be predicted with any accuracy. In 50 years, we might not even be here to enjoy the greedy children who rape their parents for gifts and money. In 50 years, we may have made contact with an intelligent, peaceful alien race... or perhaps they are war-like and the entire earth is struggling to survive... and christmas is only a luxury once remembered.

    ...in 50 years, people will read our predictions of the future again and laugh...

    1. Re:why does anyone take this seriously? by noshellswill · · Score: 0

      Greed is a hardwire pad're ... that's why the kid got born. Eh ?

    2. Re:why does anyone take this seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to make one of those "IN SOVIET RUSSIA" posts you can do so in fewer words.

      In the mean time, look who lost the Cold War.

    3. Re:why does anyone take this seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      During the decades after the fallout of nuclear war from WWIII (thank's to our good ol' prez G.W. Bush), the remaining 20% of humanity will have finally learned from our mistakes in the past, and a mental enlightenment will take place.

      ...in 50 years, people will read our predictions of the future again and laugh...

      Why wait 50 years?

    4. Re:why does anyone take this seriously? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In the mean time, look who lost the Cold War.

      That's right, all of the people of the world. FOr, while we don't have Russian communism anymore, there's still China. There's still nuclear-war style tension in the world, and now it's swept under the rug. At least during the cold war it was a fear the government couldn't avoid (so they exploited it). American Imperialism is at it's worst ever, and getting worse every day, and the American Police State is getting closer. As a result of American Imperialism, we now have a "war on terrorism" to replace the *lost* "war on drugs" (not that I'm saying we did the wrong thing and the terrorists are right, I just think that the war on terrorism is the same political ballgame that the war on drugs was, and may well be used in a catalystic fashion to bring on the police state) It won't be too long before Russa will be fighting us again in a cold war, and they'll be the ones fighting for freedom (or so the press will read, anyway).

      Of course, my predictions have as much validity as the article's. :)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    5. Re:why does anyone take this seriously? by diegote · · Score: 1

      mmm...Your prediction has a lot of succeses. but it sound more credible than others :) (But I don't think we'll learn something in the after war)

      I think the world will be quite the same. *Americans* (north americans) will be the same, South america will go into a civil war and then into a kind of war against *America* (USA will be composed by about 50% of real Americans. Yeah!, mexican and so on), Africans countries will be as poor as now, Asia will be Asia (I can't understand'it now....so, why in 2050?)...

      Hey *Americans* who is your F* president???

    6. Re:why does anyone take this seriously? by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      I can't pass this up.

      Hey *Americans* who is your F* president???

      F* president?

      typedef F dictator

      typedef U freedom

      F* president

      U safe;

      safe = Over(F* president) : throw(out);

      Sorry, I don't catch exceptions very often, so some of the syntax may be off. I also don't usually typedef, 'cause I can type types faster than I can remember what I typedefed it to.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    7. Re:why does anyone take this seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dream of a world were 14 year olds on geek sites learn how to spell.

    8. Re:why does anyone take this seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I hate to say this, but you are probably right in most points. I hope Russia doesn't rise too soon to threat the USA (although it is always such because of the nuclear missiles it has), but China is still here, growing and in its growth economically beating the USA easily.

  38. Mmmmmm... by shepd · · Score: 2

    What did you feed him?

    Hot Dogs.

    What an old idea.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  39. Reading minds? That's against the US stands for! by guido8638 · · Score: 1

    ...which are the Christian ideals on which this Country was founded. Mind reading? You had better check the holy scriptures ... reading minds, just like using stem cells to cure disease, is explicitly against the word of God. It says so, plain as day ... EZEKIEL 13:18 I swear Repentance is the message to God's people. The people have idols in their hearts. God says both the false prophets and their followers will be destroyed. God will make the land barren. See, plain as day; "do not use stem cells, do not read minds." I don't see why people can't understand that. Sadly, so many people have been tainted by independent, logical thought. Hopefully Bush can put an end these destructive habits.

  40. vegetarians by Transcendent · · Score: 3, Funny

    And there is good new for vegetarians, with turkey dinner being artificial, thanks to progress in biology and nanotechnology.

    Apparently scientists will by then have understood the molecular processes needed to convert raw materials into turkey sufficiently well to make a good replica.


    ...does anybody care about vegetarians that much??

    1. Re:vegetarians by Marr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, some scientists and engineers -are- vegetarian, for a start, but I think the technology is under development mostly for the increased efficiency it promises. Growing wheat to feed animals, no matter how callously you are prepared to treat them, nor how inventively you reclaim 'usable' parts, requires vast amounts of time, space, energy and cash compared to growing the nice parts of animals directly in tanks of goop.

      And then there's the potential for creativity, such as chimeric meat, extinct meat, fictional meat, and, er, forbidden meat..

    2. Re:vegetarians by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Heck, I'm a vegetarian and even I don't care about vegitarians that much!

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  41. genetically-engineered Furbies by Transcendent · · Score: 2

    genetically-engineered Furbies

    I didn't know plastic had genes to engineer in the first place...

  42. ... and don't forget.... by Theaetetus · · Score: 1
    Slashdot will have programming installed to filter out dupes.

    Slashdot will have programming installed to filter out dupes.

    Slashdot will have...

    -T

  43. loser by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 4, Funny

    He so totally forgot to mention shamanic magic, orks, and the Matrix.

    At least there will still be trolls, regardless of what happens.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

    1. Re:loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hah, nice Shadowrun reference

    2. Re:loser by Kizzle · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yes, trolls like me for example.

      Fuck you Fuck you penis penis penis first post

  44. Ya, right...and the DMCA will have been repealled by Myuu · · Score: 2

    I honestly think that the difference between 2050 and 2002 will not be as drastic as 1950 and now.

    IMHO...robots will be available (well they technically are in the capacity of that 'Cye' thingy), but in the capacity of tablet pcs or segways are now (Neat, useful, but expensive and somewhat impractical).

    Things will have improved, sure, but I wont be expecting a Christmas list include a G10 Titanium Laptop with a Terabyte of RAM and 100 Ghz Proc. Or to be able to browse pr0n in with my implant. Or even to have the US as a totalarian state.

    Things with slow down, they already are. Even most tech. companies admit so.
    This guys been reading to much lit. from the 50s

    --

    forget it.
  45. In our future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just want humanity to discover a souce of unlimited, clean and free energy instead of relying too much on oil. everything else should follow.

  46. Not the same by Jayson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In every example you gave, they all had a quantity that you are measuring, such as price or megahertz. It should be abundantly clear that innovation of new products doesn't fit this model, since there is no way to score it. Also you are only able to measure stable activities and innovation isn't stable, but veyr chaotic.

    1. Re:Not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It should be abundantly clear that innovation of new products doesn't fit this model, since there is no way to score it. Also you are only able to measure stable activities and innovation isn't stable, but very chaotic.


      Of course none of that matters since you were replying to a troll..

      The question is, am I replying to a troll?
    2. Re:Not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, but who will troll the trollers?

  47. Bullshit by brandonsr · · Score: 1

    This is there year 2002, where are my flying cars. WHERE ARE MY FLYING CARS? change this story to humour, please.

  48. Or the pessimistic view could be correct... by Tolvor · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sorry, I don't believe the future is going to be bright and rosy, and that all positive indicators will get better.

    Realistic predictions...

    The ozone hole gets significantly worse causing massive ecological changes. This causes social unrest in some countries and cities sparking several desperately fought wars.

    Critical resources diminish. Technology has been developed to squeeze the dregs from old wells, but there are severe shortfalls. Nuclear energy is predominant energy source.

    US continues to lose technological capability to east-asia.

    Collapse of US educational establishment.

    Violence in US streets becomes much worse. Police forces nationalized.

    1. Re:Or the pessimistic view could be correct... by Marr · · Score: 1

      Collapse of US educational establishment.

      Isn't it a bit late to be calling that a prediction?

    2. Re:Or the pessimistic view could be correct... by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Luckily we're still just at the "failure" state, collapse occurs when students start shooting their teachers.

      On second thought, maybe you're right...

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  49. Artificial turkey? by freeweed · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Thanks to progress in biology and nanotechnology, the molecular processes needed to convert raw materials into turkey will be understood sufficiently well to make a good artificial turkey for the vegetarians.

    I thought a good chunk of vegetarians were that way more because of the health benefits of not eating meat. Creating a perfect artificial turkey would still come with all the side effects of eating real ones.

    Guess this could possibly help out the extreme vegans though, who don't want anything that came from processed animal products at all - assuming these 'molecular processes' work on 100% non-animal products.

    Oh well, futurists are always amusing.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Artificial turkey? by geek · · Score: 2

      Most vegetarians are so because of animal rights. This is particularly clear in Buddhism a primarily vegetarian religion. They don't eat meat because it could have been someone they knew (rebirth etc).

      The thing is most people don't care about animal rights, food chain and all of that, so they bring up the health benefits which most people do care about.

    2. Re:Artificial turkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought a good chunk of vegetarians were that way more because of the health benefits of not eating meat. Creating a perfect artificial turkey would still come with all the side effects of eating real ones.

      I've never heard that before.

      I gather you can eat perfectly healthily as a vegetarian but it involves more work than it does for an omnivore.

    3. Re:Artificial turkey? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      I gather you can eat perfectly healthily as a vegetarian but it involves more work than it does for an omnivore.

      For example, veggies need to make sure they get enough iron in their diet. Normally you get this from meat, but no meat = no iron.

      Without it, all sorts of bad things can happen.

    4. Re:Artificial turkey? by glwtta · · Score: 2

      Honestly though, health benefits to not eating turkey? Red meat I can understand (which probably goes something like ' moderate > vegetarian > average '), but poultry?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    5. Re:Artificial turkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm, no. read a little bit about nutrition before you pronounce on it, ok?

      there are many vegetables with high iron content (e.g. broccoli). Where do you think feed animals get iron from?

      Of course, it is true that a poorly balanced diet of any kind (veggie or no) is trouble, that is hardly surprising

  50. I'm still waiting for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the nuclear-powered flying cars we'd all have by 2000. Or the nuclear-powered 1000-passenger airplanes by 1975. Tech forecasts are rarely right more than a few months into the future.

    My forecasts for 2050 - violence in the middle east, guerilla wars and revolutions in 3rd world countries, the UN will be an ineffective joke, space aliens won't make contact, the economy will be in a state of flux, and the world won't end.

  51. In Soviet Russia, by Valar · · Score: 1

    in 2050, the vegatarian turkeys sythesize the nanobots.

  52. Putting a Year to something dooms it to failure... by dWhisper · · Score: 1

    Great Technological advancements in the next 50 years will be absolutly nothing like any article has to say. Some may remember things like "By the year 2000, we'll have flying cars and never need to do anything."

    I believe we were promised robot helpers as well. The entire article seems exactly like articles from Post WW2 america, when the promise of scientific advancements like nuclear power and two city-block computer technology.

    Anytime someone has ever put a year to a selected achievement, like flying cars and artificial intellegence, those things have never really come. Why? Because those promises are built on technology that hasn't been invented yet.

    But I guess it may happen...

  53. So the Singularity isn't gonna happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happened to that business?

    1. Re:So the Singularity isn't gonna happen? by Saeger · · Score: 1
      The technological Singularity is still on its exponential track - it's just that this futurists job depends on predicting things that can be sold and aren't too much of a future shock. :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  54. I don't think it's wishfull thinking by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

    ...assuming technological progress had all the funding it desired. With the exception of intelligent robots (and nuclear war, i'd hope) all the items you listed would have been possible (although flying autos might have been a _dumb_ idea) had they gotten as much funding as some people wanted.

    Your list: "When I was a kid in the '50s, the futurists predicted routine space travel by now, commuting by flying automobiles, the hyrdrogen economy, copious nuclear power production, intelligent robots, oh - and the end of the world by nuclear war."

    *Space travel could have been rutine (or at least pretty commonplace) had we not 'given up' after reaching the moon. Establishing a lunar colony and going to Mars were all possible, but went unfunded.

    *Flying autos aren't technologicaly impossible, they're just not too smart of an idea. I'd hate to see the type of accidents people could accomplish given all three dimensions to move through...

    *The hydrogen economy, again, was (and still is) in technological reach. Economic reach? Maybe next Christmas...

    *Nuclear power, along with the hydrogen economy, are possible but not as imediatly profitable as some would like...

    *Intelligent robots may be the only idea that is truly the stuff of sci-fi for the forseable future.

    *And nuclear war? One item from your list I'm rather glad _didn't_ happen.

    I'm not saying the article's predictions will come true, but that if (when?) they don't it won't be because the technology _COULDN'T_ have been developed, but because someone didn't get the money to do it. I think most technological delays aren't from lack of knowhow or scientific ability, but from lack of grant money....

    Robotic cooking helpers, barbie dolls that walk and talk, nanotechnology assisting in cooking and making make-up better... Most of the examples from the article are not amazingly far off. The robotics to make a 'cooking companion' exist today and it's not far-fetched to have an 'intelligent' kitchen, with moniters and sensors in the oven and such, hooked up to the Internet to have it search for recipie ideas and help check to see how your food is doing.

    The only thing I'd say is totaly out of reach, even with infinite research money, is 'mind reading' technology, especialy cheap enough to be had around the dinner table. Other than that, the article only sounds far fetched because people don't like putting money into ideas that may not be profitable.

    (Were I to bet on it, I'd say the walking/talking Barbie WILL exist by 2050, and one that can do an okay job of interacting with the kid. I'll bet you anything. Toys make money, probably faster easier than an intelligent kitchen or mind-reading makeup. What these toys will do to the imagination, when it goes un-needed and unused, is a whole other issue....)

    Just my $.02

    -Trillian

    1. Re:I don't think it's wishfull thinking by Saeger · · Score: 1
      I think most technological delays aren't from lack of knowhow or scientific ability, but from lack of grant money....

      Some predictions are just bad and no amount of money should be wasted (including stupid grants from my taxes) on achievable possibilities that it turns out no one really wants to pay for. If you want to make a bad prediction, here's what you do:

      • Ignore the scientific facts, or guess. (e.g. nuclear power being too cheap to meter & flying cars (that waste more energy fighting gravity, and need still more processing power to make safe flight possible))
      • Forget to ask whether anyone wants the projected product or situation. (e.g. VideoPhones & Meal-in-a-pill...)
      • Ignore the costs. (e.g. personal rockets)
      • Try to predict which company or technology will win. (e.g. MicroVision and their retinal display patents)

      The only thing I'd say is totaly out of reach, even with infinite research money, is 'mind reading' technology

      Tell that to the SciFi Channel as they've recently become the Paranormal Channel with all the psychic tripe they run...

      Were I to bet on it, I'd say the walking/talking Barbie WILL exist by 2050, and one that can do an okay job of interacting with the kid.

      Hah. The porn industry will have RealDoll's(TM) walking decades before that. :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:I don't think it's wishfull thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying the article's predictions will come true, but that if (when?) they don't it won't be because the technology _COULDN'T_ have been developed, but because someone didn't get the money to do it.

      That's the point, bucko. Predictions that do not account for politics, economics, and human nature, but instead focus solely of "what might perhaps be possible technically", are narrowsighted and naive, and not bloody likely to come true anytime soon.

      Meaning, to rehash the words of the original poster: so much for futurists.

    3. Re:I don't think it's wishfull thinking by slipgun · · Score: 2

      Establishing a lunar colony and going to Mars were all possible, but went unfunded.

      IMHO, NASA should have handed things over to the private sector after 1972. But of course, no bureaucracy is going to let itself be destroyed that easily.

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    4. Re:I don't think it's wishfull thinking by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      -Flying autos aren't technologicaly impossible, -
      -they're just not too smart of an idea. I'd hate to
      -see the type of accidents people could accomplish
      -given all three dimensions to move through..

      Flying is not the problem - plenty of space for cars to maneuver - very few airplanes crash in midair. The problem is parking (as usual) - when all those flying cars come into the parking lot at Safeway, does Safeway need ground control radar and air traffic controllers?

      The answer of course is every rooftop needs to be a parking lot for just a few cars - that is efficient use of ground space...

      Better, every building needs to be underground, so the aboveground space is available for parking...or whatever other use is desired.

      And of course it would help if the vehicles are VTOL...

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    5. Re:I don't think it's wishfull thinking by Mithy · · Score: 2

      Were I to bet on it, I'd say the walking/talking Barbie WILL exist by 2050

      I'm surprised it doesn't already. The technology is pretty much there.

      --

      --
      "This isn't the post you're looking for. Move along."
  55. there will be no Christmas in 2050 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some sort of Ramadan may be

  56. IN SOVIET RUSSIAN by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Future predicts YOU

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  57. what is the point.. by LilGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Honestly, what is the point of even mentioning a time so far ahead of us... obviously it has been proven that we aren't exactly realistic when describing the future... not to mention the only things that ever seem to get mentioned are the economic/technological aspects of the future... what about the arts, what about peoples' attitudes.. these things all change drastically in such a great amount of time.. which makes it nearly impossible to predict with any degree of accuracy what the future will be like.. so why not live for the moment instead?

    --

    You're nothing; like me.
    1. Re:what is the point.. by JonSari · · Score: 1

      The same point as any of these /. posts. To entertain each other by giving us something to chatter on about.

  58. Christmas 2050, the human race... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christmas 2050, the human race will be sifting through radioactive ashes for rats to eat.

    -Bomb

  59. We already can convert raw material into turkey by Artifice_Eternity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...by feeding it to a small turkey, until said turkey is big enough to eat.

    A real "advance" would be the growth of free range and organic farming -- doing away with industrial farming techniques that involve shutting animals into crates, cramming them with chemical- and antibiotic-laden feed, and generally turning them into objects instead of living beings.

    Many people who now object to eating meat might change their minds, if they felt that the animals they consumed were raised in a healthy manner and treated humanely.

    I eat some meat, but try to steer clear of the more factory-farmed stuff in favor of organic/free-range products. It's preferable in so many ways: hygeinically, nutritionally, ethically, etc.

    1. Re:We already can convert raw material into turkey by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      A real "advance" would be the growth of free range and organic farming -- doing away with industrial farming techniques that involve shutting animals into crates, cramming them with chemical- and antibiotic-laden feed, and generally turning them into objects instead of living beings.

      Don't advertise your humanity by treating animals nicely just to slaughter them anyway. The end result is the same, and I'll take it cut any way I like and just slightly warmed, thank you.

      But I find your statement to smack of hypocrisy such that you state that it's possible to treat something in a humane fashion even though you intend to kill it. Isn't killing, by it's nature, inhumane?

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:We already can convert raw material into turkey by numpins · · Score: 1

      Be careful when using the words "free range" and "humane" together.

      Some "free range" farms may really care about the animals they're raising but problems can still occur at "free range" farms. These problems are due to a lack of requirements from the U.S. Department of Agriculture for "free range" farms. Here are a few examples:

      • Animals may have space to roam but nothing to eat in that space.
      • "Free range" hens may still be debeaked.
      • There may be overcrowding.
      • Flocks may be separated by sex and age.
      • "Worthless" male chicks may still be killed.
      • "Free range" cows still have a long, not-so-great future after they leave the farm and before they are "finished."

      Bibliography
      The Google Search
      Farm Sanctuary (recommended site)
      "Free Range" Poultry and Eggs: Not All They're Cracked Up to Be
      Vegetarian Times: Not-so free bird. (free-range hens and eggs)
      Cattle: Not so free on the range

    3. Re:We already can convert raw material into turkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's preferable in so many ways: hygeinically, nutritionally, ethically, etc." Ethically? Spare me the PETA diatribe. Hygenically? How would that come about? Nutritionally? Bullshit. Meat in moderation is part of a healthy OMNIVORE's diet. That which does not kill me, only makes me fatter!

    4. Re:We already can convert raw material into turkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ethically? Spare me the PETA diatribe.
      Just because you disagree with someone else's code of ethics doesn't make it invalid. Besides, it's obviously not PETA diatribe; they're against any meat eating, factory-farm or free-range is irrelevant.

      Hygenically? How would that come about?
      Well, gee, don't you think a chicken which doesn't live in its own waste products would be more hygenic than one which does?

      Nutritionally? Bullshit. Meat in moderation is part of a healthy OMNIVORE's diet.
      Whether humans are truly omnivores is a matter up for debate. Sure, our ancestors ate some meat, when they could get it. There's not really any nutritional need for meat products, though - a well planned vegetarian diet can supply all of a person's needs.

    5. Re:We already can convert raw material into turkey by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 1
      Whether humans are truly omnivores is a matter up for debate. Sure, our ancestors ate some meat, when they could get it. There's not really any nutritional need for meat products, though - a well planned vegetarian diet can supply all of a person's needs.

      Sure, it's enough to keep you alive. But that's not the same as healthy. I challenge you to name one successful athlete who is a vegetarian...

      Anyways, meat tastes nicer than that vile substance called Soya!

      --


      - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
    6. Re:We already can convert raw material into turkey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, renee metevier, who took 2nd at the NCAA cross-country championships in 2001, is a vegetarian. eats tons of cereal, but no meat.

      there are others, and "all good athletes eat meat" is just too big of a blanket statement to be true.

    7. Re:We already can convert raw material into turkey by russx2 · · Score: 1
      "I challenge you to name one successful athlete who is a vegetarian..."
      Well, how's about this list of, well, famous veggie athletes. Not all of them are what I'd call celebrities mind but still, please don't continue to spread this ignorance.
  60. Here're my predictions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the world population starts to demand the western lifestyle due to movies, books, and the Internet showing the western life to all, every Chinese and Indian will want to have a Western-style house with refrigerators, heating and air-conditioning, several computers and a car for each family member.

    As each new generation embraces the western life and rejects their parents' values, there will be no more third world to exploit to get all these appliances built for cheap, everything will be expensive.

    Universities have now pervaded the planet, with the cult members everywhere demanding Master's degrees for entry level jobs, since machines do all the labor, there has to be an artificial barrier to generate the class differences that fuel the capitalist system.

    'Education' now takes the first 45 years, on average, of a person's life, while they still live with their famillies. To get that entry level job, they need post-grad work.

    To start your life at 45 with a million dollars of debt, you need to work 80 hours a week at some salary that seemed good on paper 20 years ago. Your debt eats away a good chunk of your paycheck, but since you spend 80 hours a week at work, you have little time to notice.

    You start to want to live a little at 45, but the banks won't let you get a mortgage until you can save some money and have some stability. Meanwhile, they gladly let you have credit cards with 20% interest, and will lend you money to buy a car that will depreciate the second it rolls off the car lot.

    Due to medical advances, you can expect to live to 120-130 looking the same as a 20th century 60 year old. You can also expect to work till a hundred to pay off the cult, and your boss lets you know in no uncertain terms that there are many many 45 year olds with post-grad work in mopping the floor. Better plan to come in to work for the next few weekends.

  61. Re:Ya, right...and the DMCA will have been repeall by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1
    I honestly think that the difference between 2050 and 2002 will not be as drastic as 1950 and now.

    Naturally.... 1950 to now was 52 years... now to 2050 is only 48.

  62. YO SUCK IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's get on with life.

  63. Re:Reading minds? That's against the US stands for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See, plain as day; "do not use stem cells, do not read minds."

    hehehe that was funny as shit.

    thanks

  64. Christmas in the future by ryan89 · · Score: 1

    The picture that came to mind was that ride from Walt Disney World...Carousel of Progress I think?

    1. Re:Christmas in the future by will_die · · Score: 2

      What really comes to mind is that old video short "Design for Dreaming" complete with the "Kitchen of Tomorrow".

  65. CHRISTMAS 2050 FUCK YOU LET'S GO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean damn it. How much Christmas 2050 does anyone need? Let's go you sons of bitches, christ.

  66. Third Nipple by Comster · · Score: 1

    Its funny about this prediction. This lady with 3 nipples told me the same thing!

  67. Big Beautiful Tomorrow by kpdvx · · Score: 1

    It's a great big beautiful tomorrow, shining at the end of every day! It's a great big beautiful tomorrow, and tomorrow is just a dream away! Man has a dream, and that's a start! He follows his dream from mind to heart, and when it becomes a reality, it makes a better world for you and me! Oh it's a great big beautiful tomorrow, shining at the end of every day! It's a great big beautiful tomorrow, and tomorrow is just a day away!! Is it just me, or does this story sound like the last stage of the "Carousel of Progress" in Disney World? Hehe, that's gotta be one of my favorite "rides". :)

    1. Re:Big Beautiful Tomorrow by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Actually I was thinking about star trek until I reached the last couple of sentences.

      "Don't tell me you don't have money in the 23rd century."

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  68. Apocalyptic Hollywood future by Groganz · · Score: 1

    The first step is Mad Max-like, then comes Skynet, then The Matrix. Or have I been lied to again by Hollywood?

  69. hijacked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christmas was hijacked by a consumption fever, so too in 2050, Christmas will be all about presents.

    it won't be the first time, it was hijacked from other winter celebrations of the time to be a holiday for the Christians it is fitting that it is now a holiday of the corporations interests.

  70. Re:Ya, right...and the DMCA will have been repeall by martyn+s · · Score: 1

    The difference between 2002 and 2050 will be much more drastic than 1950 and now. Despite the fact that 2002-2050 is only 48 years, and 1950-2002 is 52. MUCH MORE DRASTIC.

  71. Eh... by GojiraDeMonstah · · Score: 1

    That's what they were saying 50 years ago too. About the only sci-fi thing that's actually come to fruition is 1984 ("Patriot" Act, TIAA, etc.). Merry Christmas!! (or Allahmas, or whatever).

    --
    "Stop throwing the Constitution in my face, it's just a goddamned piece of paper!" - George W. Bush Nov. 2005
  72. Pipe Dream by the_burton · · Score: 1

    Its only a flight of fancy that lets you believe that the plebs of society will nicely eradicate themselves whilst the dreamers take over. Have no fear though, because in 2050 we won't need to live in big cities anymore, and the people who we would wish to disappear will congregate in vast numbers living off of each parasitically. No worries though, if you give them what they want then they'll be happy enough to breed themselves into oblivion.

    --
    Polluting the Internet since 2003...
    http://percep
    1. Re:Pipe Dream by the_burton · · Score: 1

      Whoa. That was pretty angry.

      --
      Polluting the Internet since 2003...
      http://percep
  73. Stalled technologies by Animats · · Score: 2
    Technologies advance rapidly for a while, then tend to slow markedly, with quite slow progress over time. Examples:
    • Aviation advanced rapidly from 1900 to about 1970. By 1970, the Concorde, SR-71, and Boeing 747 were all flying. Progress since then has been minor. Compare 1940 aircraft, 1970 aircraft, and 2000 aircraft.
    • Nuclear energy had a compressed growth period, from 1944 to about 1970. By 1970, the A and H bombs were mature technologies, and commercial power plants were running. Fusion power never worked.
    • Railroads were a mature technology around 1940. But then, in the 1980s, the field came back to life a bit, when railcar suspensions were finally figured out and high speed trains started to work well.

    Now think about the point at which computing will be a mature technology.

    1. Re:Stalled technologies by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      Compare 1940 aircraft, 1970 aircraft, and 2000 aircraft.

      Comparing 1970 aircraft and 2000 aircraft isn't all that hard, since they're still flying the exact same planes that were built in 1970!

      As another comparison, look at how much automobiles advanced in the first 3 decades of the 1900's. From a cable handbrake and top speeds around 35mph to top speeds over 80mph with hydraulic brakes. Automotive technology didn't start to improve again until fuel injection started showing up, but that even didn't get good until computers got small enough for cars.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    2. Re:Stalled technologies by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      other things happen in automobiles too.

      suspension and other things matter greatly and have improved in the time you say automobile adanvancement stood still((dual)overhead camshafts(in some consumer cars since late 50's or so), hydraulically assisted disc brakes.. things like that that).

      and i might not have my leg(s), since if we had been riding with my friends citroen cv2 instead of my other friends fiat punto while doing a relatively low speed crash, my legs would surely would have gotten some damage. now the punto just got written off because it's front-corner caved in.(both fiat punto and citroen cv2 are relatively of same size, and are same type of cars, cheap&small, just from different decades). if we had been driving a suv the elderly man in the other car would have gotten some serious damage.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Stalled technologies by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 0
      suspension and other things matter greatly and have improved in the time you say automobile adanvancement stood still

      I didn't say stood still, I said "moved slowly". Back when I did suspension and brake work I had opportunity to work on a few (well, more than a few) cars and trucks from the early '50's. Basic brake design was the same as it is on brand new 2002-03 cars. The only difference is ABS, which came about with computers. Now, I'll be the first to admit that in the time period(s) we're discussing a LOT of tuning of all of the systems occurred, causing a net improvement. However, to see what I'm talking about you have to look at the drastic differences in production model years starting in the early '70's for some and coming to today.

      To be sure, a lot of shit showed up early and got dismissed for whatever reasons. The oldest fuel injection IIRC was in the late '60's, may have been early '70s (oldest I've worked with was 1974, but I know there were older ones). Fuel injection didn't take in the marketplace seriously until the mid-80s. People were addicted to carbs. Computers were still added to the systems, though, and began controlling the mixture in carbeurated systems.

      Furthermore, safety regulations have forced certain advances, such as this so-called cab-forward design. But consider how long it took for collapsible steering columns? They're just U-joints. Heh. My 1971 chevy truck has a straight column and is the only real serious safety issue (at least as far as performance in a collision) for me, but the entire truck is a safety issue if I hit someone else with it.

      I'm getting distracted. The point is, car development has been increasing over the last 20+ years, but there was a noticeable period when it didn't. Look at the engines used. Engines used for 30 years because they couldn't come up with something better? Maybe they were busy? Maybe the market didn't want anything better because it wanted something known to work? Whatever the reason, the common cars had roughly the exact same shit at the time. These days the complete engine design might change every 3-6 years.

      Sorry I dont' have more specific examples, it's early morning and I haven't slept yet, so all the details are fuzzy. I'm just on cruise control (developed in the '50's iirc, but still not widely available, therefore not particularly advanced).

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    4. Re:Stalled technologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The oldest fuel injection IIRC was in the late '60's, may have been early '70s (oldest I've worked with was 1974, but I know there were older ones). Fuel injection didn't take in the marketplace seriously until the mid-80s.

      I used to have an old green 1962 Mercedez Benz that had Bosch multiport sequential fuel injection...all mechanical and used a device that looked just like an ignition distributor, except it had individual fuel lines, one per cylinder, coming out the top cap instead of spark plug wires. After everything else was worn out on the engine, the fuel injector system was still working fine.

      People were addicted to carbs.

      Look around at your avg American these days... they're still addicted to carbs... carbohydrates, that is.

      As to the

    5. Re:Stalled technologies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fusion power worked since 1991. However it isn't effictive yet.

  74. Simulacra by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    I'm a little worried the great great grandchildren of this project will fly into my car to blare commercials at me. It'd give a new meaning to popup ads!

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  75. Science Fiction by the_burton · · Score: 1

    I too would bet on anything a science fiction writer predicted over anything similar to what this person is spewing out. My belief is that much of the inovation we see in the world today is based on a glimmer of a brighter future which may have included technology X, found only in a good science fiction novel. Some lone person reads the book, makes the connection and proceeds to subtley change the world with their new contribution. The original inspiration, however, resides in the authors mind.

    --
    Polluting the Internet since 2003...
    http://percep
  76. Yeah, whatever by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    I am a vegetarian strictly for the health benefits. Actually I am not trying to 'fix' anything by doing it, I just hope to live whatever life I have left in a more healthy fassion. Never cared much for the animals or humans for that matter, go ahead kill all the cows by scaring the shit out of them, see if I care. I wear leather and fur when I want and don't give a damn about any religion, since I am an atheist. So there. And yes, I've been doing it for the past 7 or 8 years now and I LOVE my fucking food (only raw fruits and vegetables, honey,nuts and an occasional coffee with a cheese cake).

    1. Re:Yeah, whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ... don't give a damn about any religion, since I am an atheist.

      As a reply to someone who mentioned Buddhism, that's a non-sequitur. I'm an atheist too, and a Buddhist. The central insights of Buddhism have nothing to do with belief in gods.

    2. Re:Yeah, whatever by NineNine · · Score: 2

      I eat whatever I want and I'm healthy as an ox. In my opinion A. It's mental. If you spend all of your time worrying about what you eat and being healthy, then you WILL be sick (and neurotic) B. It's exercise. I work all day, every day. I could eat nothing but fatback all day and not gain a pound. Actually, since I've started working all day every day, I now eat one large cheese pizza a day, Wendy's a few times, and other random food that comes by. I've also lost 5 pounds.

    3. Re:Yeah, whatever by roman_mir · · Score: 2

      A. I am not doing it to lose weight, that's a stupid notion. If you eat right your weight will be stable and will be your actual expected weight.

      B. If in the beginning I had to think about what I was going to eat after a year you stop thinking about it, it is just your normal life. Why do I have to think about anything if I buy only stuff I eat and do not even consider other products in stores as food?

      C. Excercise will keep your muscles toned, sure, but it will not do anything at all to protect you from all the crap that you intake. That's all I am saying, did I say anything about not excercising?

      D. There are many peope who are neurotic and they are not vegetarians. Some people become neurotic from overexcercising for example; ever heard of guys going nuts about not been big enough and pumping metall 12 hours a day every day? - that's neurotic and not healthy.

      Cheers

  77. two things... by h4x0r-3l337 · · Score: 1
    • 50 years ago, they predicted we'd have robotic servants in every home by now. We don't, and I don't think we will 50 years from now.
    • Some people are vegetarians because they don't LIKE meat. Having the perfect artificial turkey won't change that.
  78. Robotic kitten assailant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... at least that's what i read on first try.
    I need sleep.

  79. Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me a break. This guy is presenting visions of 2000 as seen from 1920, fer gawd sakes, with a few nearly ancient buzzwords thrown in to spice it up. Any "futurologist" that conceives of nanotechnology maturing to the point where turkeys can be made from dirt but thinks people will still be cooking in kitchens (uh, with friendly robot assistants) and that gift exchange will be paramount at Christmas (in spite of the fact that anyone will be able to make anything with dirt and software), is a short-sighted moron at best, a ridiculous fraud at worst.

    There have been at least a dozen articles of similar low quality posted on /. over the past week. What gives? Is someone trolling the smart people, or has /.'s quality really gotten to the point where there's nothing more interesting to discuss than futurologists less forward-thinking than half-century dead sci-fi writers and which town in which 3rd world country has decided to use Linux for bookkeeping? Back to kuro5hin...

  80. robotic assistant? by xo0m · · Score: 1

    o please, spare me the futuristic jetsons babble. for years has the human race spoke of having robots as assistants in the 21st century...it's the 21st century people and how far have we come? i have one word for you - aibo.

    it certaintly would be scary if one could read another's mind. i'm sure freudians especially would be pissed.

    merry christmas all!

  81. No subject by OzOX · · Score: 1

    It is so sweet, but never come ture in time. ;P

  82. How do you like the taste of shoe leather? by alizard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Pull your foot out of your mouth before responding. I'm amazed you managed to find 3 moderators having off-days at the same time, even here. Technology is something we're supposed to know about. At least some of us.

    I found most of the projections timid.

    The "kitchen assistant" stuff is largely available in component form (mixers, ovens, etc. that can sync to a recipe and will tell the chef what to put in when, monitor quantities of ingredients, turn the oven on to a defined time/temperature, etc.) NOW. Ambitious would be to project that we'll have fully automated kitchens. That can be done in today's technology, though not in a form that'll fit a household kitchen. In the 2050 fast food restaurant, you'll be able to get things ranging from the current menu to anything available at the 5 star restaurants of today, but fast food restaurants will have disappeared as a separate category whose memory will linger only in brand names. Restaurants with human cooks and service will be considered superpremium places and will have prices to match.

    "there will be screens lining the wall."

    The price of flat-panel display technology is dropping and the availability is increasing. OLED is screen-printed, not vacuum deposited.

    Do you really think that videophones that can be attached to the network aren't going to be available for the price of a cheap one-piece deskphone now, and that the problems building a Net appliance that'll be secure and "Just Works" and of universal broadband availability won't be solved in 48 years?

    With the exception of thought recording and transference hardware, everything discussed is in either research or early pre-alpha. It is hardly the author's fault you haven't been paying attention, most of what's in the article has been bloglinked from here.

    The problem with this kind of futurism is that the futurist considers the future to be a linear extension of the present... while his predictions might be accurate, they look more like 2012 than 2050 to me.

    The problems with a robotic household all-purpose servant that can use human tools will be solved by then, but people may be so used to intelligent point-solution household appliances (automated vacuum cleaners, etc.) that nobody will care.

    The writer doesn't deal with space at all. One prediction I'm certain of. Either the human race will be exploiting the Solar System as a whole by then or nobody will have pleasant Xmases by then, people will be too busy suffering the kind of deprivations that go with cultures in a state of permanent war, in this case, over who gets enough of the Earth's dwindling resources of materials required to sustain technological society in order to keep one. I'm not talking about oil here, by then, we won't have a technological culture burning oil for fuel. That's why auto manufacturers are converting their assembly lines over to high-efficiency or fuel-cell vehicles. Even Toyota, who's going over to superefficient hybrid engines says that the vehicles are intended for easy conversion to fuel cells.

    However, some dreams are less likely than others. The problem with a personal jet pack is sort of obvious, a device that has to provide all its lift as well as forward motion via reaction sucks up a hell of a lot of fuel.

    Will we ever find the exceptions or reinterpetation of physical law that'll make a starship possible? I certainly don't know. Check the NASA "Warp Drive When" site for their Advanced Propulsion project for the latest.

    1. Re:How do you like the taste of shoe leather? by zenyu · · Score: 2

      Restaurants with human cooks and service will be considered superpremium places and will have prices to match.
      I think it's more likely that all of us will have maids again. The only reason that kind of labor is expensive is because our borders are effectively closed. When we finally recognize the human right of migration again there will be plenty of people to take those jobs and send money home to improve the lot of their families.

      Do you really think that videophones that can be attached to the network aren't going to be available for the price of a cheap one-piece deskphone now...
      There are already video phones. There's a guy in my lab that spends half his time talking with his family and friends on his laptop all day. Most of us don't want video phones, I for one have no desire to fix my hair and get dressed in the morning before calling someone. All we're really missing now is the gateways between internet phones and the POTS system, and these are appearing in the form commercial internet phone systems. At the moment those work like regular phones, but it won't be long before enough people have them that when they call each other they can have the option of video. So if we all do have video phones in 2, 20 or 200 years we'll still say "the camera seems to be broken."

      The writer doesn't deal with space at all. One prediction I'm certain of. Either the human race will be exploiting the Solar System as a whole by then or nobody will have pleasant Xmases by then
      We won't be exploiting space by then. Our 1960's space program was much like the pyramids in Egypt, an extraordinary re-direction of reasources away from the people to achieve an engineering goal we're not ready for. We need to develop alternative energy sources before we really get into space. The chinese are the only ones serious about fusion, perhaps by 2050 they will have figured it out. That or something like it is a pre-requisite. Hey maybe we'll figure out a way to get more energy out of geothermal plants, I dunno. But we need massive amounts of energy to create the fuels to get us there, and figure out a way to get the fuels to get back. Between now and then we should be sending more probes and exploring.

    2. Re:How do you like the taste of shoe leather? by RicktheBrick · · Score: 1

      People will live in large apartment buildings with totaly sound proof apartments. Transportation will be acomplished by totaly automatic vehicle which will go to one's front door. Only if permission is granted will one be able to get to any door other than one's own. All buildings and roads will be underground. Geniticlly modified seeweed will be produce for the right material to sustain live. It will be liquidified and transported like water. There will be no kitchen. All work will be done remotely with robots controlled by humans who are in their home. Video screens will give the illusion of being anywhere so there will be no windows. One will be able to live a lifetime without seeing or hearing their neighbor. Almost all jobs will be in the medical field. One will report on the effects of taking diffent types of seeweed. Drugs will make one feel 10 times better and longer than sex without any side effects. Apartments will be build to last centuries so will be owned by the government which will settle with the estate of the user when the user dies. Thus food and housing will be a right enjoyed by everyone. Everyone will have a electronic friend which will have acess to all knowledge. All this will be acomplished with the use of a very small amount of energy and materials compared to what is used today.

    3. Re:How do you like the taste of shoe leather? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geniticlly modified seeweed will be produce for the right material to sustain live

      imagine the smell of the feces that will make- swamp gas on steroids

    4. Re:How do you like the taste of shoe leather? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Yoy ever see what regualer exposure to a kithen does to monitors, and computers?
      Cheap easy to use webcams have been around for 5 years, even after setting up system to use them for people, they still don't make video calls.
      Peple don't want to be seen while on the phone.

      It not just how long until we can build it, its how long until we can build it, and how long till people are willing to use it.

      BTW, cooking is not just putting ingrediant in at certian times. There is a very wide range of variables, not the least of which involves tasting.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  83. 2001 wrong ... 2010 ... maybe by Lolaine · · Score: 0

    Even Mr Clarke didnt preview rightly what would it be in 2001 ... lets see if by 2010 we have two suns :D

    --
    ------- The last Sig. got fired.
  84. Mind reading could cure all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it certaintly would be scary if one could read another's mind

    Would it really be scary if we could read each otehrs minds? Sure it would take alot of getting used to, but the generation that grows up like that would thinbk it is natural.

    Now think about how much trouble ignorance and mis-communication cause. Would rascism and discrimination be so prevailant if we could walk in the shoes of the oppressed?

    Think about life in the city. Where I live people basically ignore each other, not helping even when they want to because for somereason we think the recipient doesn't want help. Even if I see someone and want to help, I am often afraid to help because I don't want to scare them (a large foreigner tends to scare old Japanese women easily).

    I for one could feel a lot more secure every day knowing that other people are just as insecure in certain situations.

    1. Re:Mind reading could cure all by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1
      I for one could feel a lot more secure every day knowing that other people are just as insecure in certain situations.

      If your own sense of security depends on other people's sense of security, I'd say you got bigger problems.

      Offer the lady help if you want, if she turns it down drive away. She's watching her ass, and you don't want to undermine her effort to protect herself, even if you have altruistic motives.

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  85. you'll cheer in fudville, 2050 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can't help butt FEEl the 'joy' as i insert my jingle.NET massturd card into the tree.NET, watching IT "come to LIEf", for a mere 2 billybuks, for the whole day. am i euphoric now, or what?

    that'll be all the FUNd any of US can bear up to at once there, so we'll move along to ?choosing? the daze VDOs. maybe we'll watch the Upgrade Day(tm) (used to be called christmas) edition of "the kode ahead", the kingdumb's latest re-lease. euphoria again.

    well, that's it for US, got to get some rest, as the stock markups are open again tomorrow, & we doN'T waNT to have a "tired" clicking finger, as we may get the fud souled out from under US again. gawd bless US, every won.

  86. Back to stone age in 2050? by ktorn · · Score: 1

    Let's all hope Pearson's predictions are more or less accurate, because if you're pessimistic, and today there is a good reason to be, then the future looks quite grim.

    One can imagine the world falling in war, with most civilisation wiped out by biological/chemical/nuclear weapons.
    Most of modern's technology will be no good without electricity, so any survivors will be going back to basics. Back to stone age?

    With all respect to Mr. Pearson, such a grim prediction is just as likely to happen (or more likely even) than his own.
    Personally (trying to stay positve) I think we'll have... just a bit more pollution, a bit more technology (no way robotic kitchen helpers!), less educated masses, and an ever increasing gap between the few rich and the many poor... not much change then.

  87. What's missing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2050, you have aged considerably from your younger slashdot days.
    You have finally gotten laid, infact you are now married and have several kids.
    Things have slowed down between you and your wife and you haven't gotten any in several months. So what's the geek to do.
    You browse to Slashdot the antique and see it's very last article published was the first conscious real doll, well not conscious in the way of people, but in the way a dog is.

    You spend an amount of money equal to you car and it arrives in a large wooden crate. As you open it up you realize it looks just like you wife did 50 years ago, and it has your hands!

  88. *coughing* by Craig3010 · · Score: 1

    BULLSHIT! I was suppose to have a flying car back in the 80's according to "experts" in the '50s.

    1. Re:*coughing* by Mithy · · Score: 2

      BULLSHIT! I was suppose to have a flying car back in the 80's according to "experts" in the '50s.

      It's called a helicopter. :)

      --

      --
      "This isn't the post you're looking for. Move along."
  89. my prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here's my prediction -- everything past the first sentence is bollocks.

    The world as it is today will still be the same shitty cloud of collective crap in 50 years time.

  90. "artificial turkey for the vegetarians" by Llanfairpwllgwyngyll · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "good artificial turkey for the vegetarians"

    Good heavens, do you really think most vegetarians WANT artificial turkey? Maybe those who changed during their life "miss" meat, but those of us who have NEVER eaten it (not for the past 150 years in my case as a 4th generation vegetarian) it's not something we would ever contemplate.

    The WORST sort of vegetarian food is that which is made to look, feel and taste like meat. Unfortunately, that seems to be what most people think of when they try to prepare vegetarian fare.

    1. Re:"artificial turkey for the vegetarians" by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Homo sapiens are omnivores. It's hard to imagine a human honestly not craving meat. It's like saying, "nope, I've never wanted to have sex in my life. Haven't for four generations... oops." I personally don't believe people who say, "I love veggies. I hate meat." I can't believe it. Those people usually just have something to prove, anyway.

    2. Re:"artificial turkey for the vegetarians" by glwtta · · Score: 2
      Good heavens, do you really think most vegetarians WANT artificial turkey?

      Ok, how do you explain tofurky then, eh? :)

      Seriously though, seems there is a number of vegetarians who are only vegetarians because they don't believe that we should kill animals for food (obviously, you are not one of them), seems they would like the idea... or some of them, at least.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:"artificial turkey for the vegetarians" by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Funny, I am a vegetarian and can honestly say that even before I was a vegetarian, the only 'meat' I craved wasn't even real meat;(McDonald's). Now the only meat that I would say I occasionally consider eating is seafood, which tastes real good. Apart from that, I have no desire to eat any meat.

      Besides, I believe that most 'cravings' are a result of a deficiency of one sort or another. If that's true, then apparently my vegetarian diet is fulfilling my dietary and nutritional needs and there's no need for me to want to eat meat.

      When's the last time you ate meat plain? I don't think many people do, it wouldn't taste good if you didn't add a crapload of non-meat items to it. But you can go in the garden pull up a vegetable and it raw and it tastes fine. So maybe it's not even the meat that people want, but all the dressings on top of it that make it taste edible enough to eat.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:"artificial turkey for the vegetarians" by NineNine · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you ate meat plain? I don't think many people do, it wouldn't taste good if you didn't add a crapload of non-meat items to it.

      All the time. It's called Sashimi. Steak tar-tar. Meat is good stuff. But I dunno... maybe if I exerted myself 0% a day, and only burned calories typing away at a keyboard all day and moving my eyeballs like some kind of bloated, beached whale, then I could go veggie.

    5. Re:"artificial turkey for the vegetarians" by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      You really are a sorry case NineNine. But... keep eating your precious meat. It just means that I will outlive you by decades. THAT will make the world a slightly better place.

  91. Presents? by jedrek · · Score: 2

    Lastly, just as this Christmas was hijacked by a consumption fever, so too in 2050, Christmas will be all about presents.

    Whatever. This christmas eve was like many a christmas eve before it at my home: lots of people (14) - some I see only on christmas eve, others I see every day, others I hadn't met before; lots of different food (candided beets, herring salad, baked fish, poppyseed cake, etc); a christmas tree; christmas carols.

    It lasted about seven hours, from 6pm to 1am, like it usually does. Sure, we had presents, but they sure as hell weren't the centerpiece. Sure, when I was a kid it was mostly about the loot, now it's totally about the love. It's about having a couple of days when nobody needs to make an excuse to get away from everyday chores, and spend time with they people who they want to.

    So lay off the bullshit, for a lot of us christmas is much more than presents.

  92. Xmas as we know it probably won't even exist! by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    This futuroligist is nothing but yet another paid professional bullshitter. Given the way Xmas has evolved throughout christianities history and the way it's changing just now, Xmas most certainly won't be celebrated the way we do it today.
    It could also very well be that the larger part of animals with a spinal column have died out due to strange diseases and/or enviromental causes and that most people won't even consider eating meat anymore. Adding stuff about mindreaders and other crap doesn't make this statement any more interessting. How do these people make a living, I wonder?

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Xmas as we know it probably won't even exist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How do these people make a living, I wonder?" Well it is certainly not by posting on Slashdot. Harrumph!

  93. Non se ne puo' piu'. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Madonna ma non vi stancate mai di leggere sempre le stesse cazzate? Alla faccia del geek..."

  94. FIRST ARTIFICIAL VAGINA POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we've got robotic kitches assistants and the ability to grow synthetic turkey meat, then the average salshdot geek will be screwing his kitchen assistant's succulent artifical vagina in 2050.

  95. 1939 Worlds's Fair year 2000 prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Predictions ignore the fact that the world is vastly over-populated, even with all the wars, disease, etc. I suppose Christmas 2050 will look like something out of a "Mad Max" movie.

    1. Re:1939 Worlds's Fair year 2000 prediction by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      the world is vastly over-populated

      Drive out of town for 30-60 minutes. See all that empty space? Every human on the planet can fit in Texas, with enough room for an apartment for each family member. The big problem is that then there would not be anything "lone" about The Lone Star State.

    2. Re:1939 Worlds's Fair year 2000 prediction by borkus · · Score: 1

      Overpopulation isn't a square foot per person space - it's a resource issue. On the input side, where do you grow all of the food for people to eat and where do you get the other resources - timber, oil, etc - to provide them with shelter. Sure, there's a lot of space available in the US, but how much of it's arable that's not already under cultivation? Then, what do you do will all of the trash and filth that humans generate. In particular, where do you put all of the waste so you don't pollute the place where you grow your food.

      I'll be grateful to have fresh vegetables and real meat 50 years in the future.

  96. New business model by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Ok, this one hasn't appeared yet, so here we go:

    1. Pay some arguably mediocre to dream up some shit.

    2. Troll slashdot with it

    3. Post banners

    4. ???

    5. Profit!

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  97. Notice they're smart enough not to mention. . . by kfg · · Score: 2

    the flying cars we won't have -- Again.

    They've 'predicted' that one so many times that they've finally figured out that we're "lost pidgeons" on that topic.

    They're still predicting that machines will read our minds and do everything we want for us before we even know we want it though. Kinda makes me wonder just what it is *we* are expected to be doing.

    I guess the future is scarier than we thought. A life of maintaining the machines that maintain us, until the machines take that function over too.

    Good thing I'll believe this is even possible when the the machines give me monkeys flying out of my butt for Christmas.

    Or a flying Alfa Romeo.

    KFG

  98. But I mean doesn't anyone notice by taioankok · · Score: 1

    That there's very little that's been new in almost 100 years? The only *new* things my Grandpa's ever seen in most of his life is television and a computer-- and he doesn't really use it. He had an iron when he was little-- and it was made of iron. He put it on the stove to heat it up and iron the clothes. In fact, as far as my grandfather's concerned, outside of biological innovations (which certainly effect our lives quite a bit), his life isn't much different than it was when he was growing up. He wakes up, eats food (that he cooked on a stove and took out of a refrigerator), gets dressed (now with clothes mad ewith slave labor), goes and waters his yard (now using a mass produced plastic watering can instead of a metal one), drives to work (in a car-- much different than the cars of the 1920s and '30s, but still just a car), comes home and does everything else he would have done before. As much as technology is affecting my life and how I interact with family, and how I keep in touch, it's not affecting the whole world, or even many Americans.

    --
    JC "What"
  99. Get with the now BT! by Sinus0idal · · Score: 1

    BT's futurologist?? Now I know why BT are loosing so much money each year. They should stop worrying about the future, and start rolling out more ADSL... or they might not BE around in 50 years time...

  100. Prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The EU will become the main superpower, followed by China, US, Russia.

  101. 1950's by fldvm · · Score: 1

    Why does this read like the stuff they said we would have now in 1955?

  102. Forecasting By Carnivores by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    But what vegan cares what turkey tastes like? What is needed is the creation of beans with all the necessary proteins.

    Wouldn't a vegan have forecast that by 2050, nanotechnology will be able to produce a nutritious tofu turkey with a flavor which is acceptable to carnivores?

  103. In 2050..... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

    The Soviet Union predicts YOU!

    Erm, okay I'll go away now...

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  104. And, (God willing...) by mtec · · Score: 2


    All men won't have beards and all women won't be wearing burkas.

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  105. Reminds me of a TV advert... by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    "A robotic kitchen assistant could help take the stress out of the preparations."

    Hmm...

    "(Roboto-chan! Make the turkey for me, I'll be back in a few hours!)"

    (Comes back to find the robot in bed with his microwave)

    He who drinks Australian thinks Australian!

  106. Ba Wango by SoVi3t · · Score: 1

    [i]so too in 2050, Christmas will be all about presents[/i] Is that any different from now? I seem to recall predictions made by the president of RCA back in the 20's stating we would all have nuclear reactors in our houses by the 90's, to feed us power.

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  107. Paid to dream? by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

    In 2050 companies who have succeeded will have largley done so through the aid of futurologists like me. Any company that in 2002 gave a payrise to these futurologists received huge increases in profits, as they knew excatltly what to plan for... ...dream on...

  108. Xmas a footnote in Muslim world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In 2050 the world will be 80% Muslim with all of the major developed countries being Islamic republics. Islam recognizes the contributions of the prophet Jesus, but does not celebrate his birthday. Islam also permits all monotheistic faiths to worship- even Iraq is 10% Christian. But the go-getters will follow the majority faith.

    1. Re:Xmas a footnote in Muslim world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 2050 the world will be 80% Muslim with all of the major developed countries being Islamic republics.

      Perhaps a straight-line extrapolation would show this, but as anyone who's ever invested in a mutual fund knows, "past performance is not an indicator of future results". As for all the major developed countries being Islamic republics - can you point out even ONE 'major developed country' that's an Islamic republic now? Do you think there's any chance of the U.S. becoming an Islamic republic in 50 years? I think the Mormons or the Scientologists have a better chance of taking over our government than Muslims.

    2. Re:Xmas a footnote in Muslim world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By 2050 most Muslim's will have been killed in WWIII , aka "The Great Religious War".

  109. What about Rocket Packs? by cyranoVR · · Score: 1

    I always thought that by now we'd have Rocket Packs for flying around by this point (oh yeah, and robot servants too). If we don't have personal Rocket Packs by 2050, I'm going to be mega pissed.

  110. Change by mraymer · · Score: 2
    Humans don't understand the concept of change very well. That's not surprising, since humans don't really understand very much about themselves (where they came from, why they are here, etc).

    When trying to predict the future, one must always look at the past. What have we seen in the past? Well, usually what happens is something so groundbreaking, so radical is invinted that it changes and shapes the whole course of civilziation in ways no one could have expected, making the current way of life and even forms of government inadequet. Cannons/Gunpowder in the feudal age was such an invention, basically defeating the enitre purpose of castles. The automobile was another... what part of your daily life is NOT touched in some way by the invention of the automobile? In the future, instantaneous matter transportation (beam me up, Scotty!) could be such an invention. Think of how quickly the world would have to change if anyone could travel anywhere instantly. Think of the implications it would have for crime if there was no way to prevent people from "beaming" into certain locations. Also, this is something that we a currently able to imagine. The really future-changing inventions will be extensions of future inventions, thusly being almost impossible for us to concieve right now.

    I have a lot of hope for humanity. I think that in a few million years we could have a maverlous, galactic civilazation, numbering in the trillions. The quality of life would be so vastly improved by the technolgy and the abudant resouces available in the galaxy in the form of solar power and raw elements, especially compared to what we have here on this little blue dot called home. Sometimes, I think I was accidentally born a few hundered thousand years too soon. ;)

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    1. Re:Change by glwtta · · Score: 2
      Humans don't understand the concept of change very well. That's not surprising, since humans don't really understand very much about themselves

      Out of curiosity - what advanced alien civilization are you part of? That you know so much about us humans which we don't.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Change by mraymer · · Score: 2

      It's funny you should ask that. ;) I actually was trying to make my post sound like it was coming from an outsider's perspective.

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  111. But if we are... by mtec · · Score: 2

    It'll be the 13th century anyway.

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  112. Offtopic, but... by Starquake · · Score: 1

    Religious tolerance means tolerating other people's religions and not just forcing greater acceptance of your own. What you are suggesting sounds a lot like the destruction of one religion at the sake of another, which is exactly what you say the problem is in the first place.

    1. Re:Offtopic, but... by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 1

      No. I support the government not being involved in religion AT ALL. Period. Things like the Hanukkah and Ramadan celebrations in NYC are bad enough, but even worse since they leave out other traditions. And, had it been Hanukkah, not Christmas that had been left out there would be near-riots.

  113. Alas Babylon / Mad Max / Postman world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the Thunderdome. Two men enter, one man leaves.

  114. and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... don't forget about the flying cars! </SARCASM>

  115. Read the book "Alas, Babylon" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the book "Alas, Babylon"

  116. Must be nice by NineNine · · Score: 2

    Must be nice to have the time and money to worry about how your meat is raised. I'm just happy to be able to afford to buy meat. I have a lot of customers who are vegan or vegetarian, or who want to meet the meat before they eat it (what's his name? how big was his pen? what did he eat? Did he heat only organcally grown corn? Can I see where the corn was grown?). Without fail, those people are wealthy, in that they have plenty of money and time to waste worrying about shit like this. While I envy their resources, I can definitely say that if I had time and money enough like they do, I wouldn't waste it worrying about every little fucking molecule that enters my body. They're all fucking neurotic. If you ask me, life is too short to be neurotic. Eat & be happy.

    1. Re:Must be nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you don't know how to be happy. You seriously need to chill out, take a walk, get away from your computer.

  117. Re:Ya, right...and the DMCA will have been repeall by RumpRoast · · Score: 1

    I'm not an expert on Moore's law, or anything, but I'd suspect in 2050 Multiple Terabytes of RAM and THz Processors won't be outrageous.

    --

    My Ass hurts.
  118. What?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Lastly, just as this Christmas was hijacked by a consumption fever, so too in 2050, Christmas will be all about presents."

    Oh bullshit. Did you notice sales numbers were down this year? Point to the economy as an excuse or whatever, but the bottom line is that Christmas for most people is about spending time with loved ones. Presents are just the icing on the cake.

  119. Blinded again by psicE · · Score: 2

    Did it ever occur to the author of this story that, quite possibly, vegetarians would not want to eat an artificial turkey?

    Most vegetarians, in my experience, have more than one reason for making their choice. Sure, there's the obvious, that "animal life is sacred" and that animals should not be killed under any condition. But what about health? Obviously, synthetic turkey would be just as unhealthy and cholesterol-packed as real turkey. (You could bioengineer a cholesterol-free turkey, but I'm not sure if it could still be properly called turkey.)

    What about the organic principle? You often find many 'vegetarians' who stay away from red meat for health reasons, but would sooner eat hunted poultry or fished salmon than bioengineered tomatoes; they realize that for humans to live, we must by necessity kill other lifeforms (whether animal or plant), but that we should not interfere with nature until the end.

    What about taste? Some vegetarians, believe it or not, just don't like the taste of red meat, poultry, or even fish, because they were brought up not to eat those products and never developed the taste.

    There are a certain number of people who would be overjoyed by the development of a bioengineered turkey. However, I believe that those people would mostly be lifelong omnivores living in the suburbs, who have pangs of conscience every time they take their children to tour the local farms. This turkey would make it possible for them to pretend they were actually making a moral judgment. Vegeterians, meanwhile, won't care.

    1. Re:Blinded again by geekoid · · Score: 2

      ". But what about health? Obviously, synthetic turkey would be just as unhealthy and cholesterol-packed as real turkey"
      but in the future that won't matter because will will have Nanites in are body keeping are arteries clean and are teeth white. And we will always look like we're 25, and live for 400 years.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  120. In the year 2050 by corvi42 · · Score: 2

    An android Jenna Jameson wet nurse will tickle your senile old chin and giggle suggestively as it changes your diapers and wipes the drool from your face, and you'll feel oh-so-ripped off that you aren't young enough to enjoy the advantages of the future.

    --

    There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
  121. Hmmm... by CommieLib · · Score: 2

    The most significant part of a turkey's existence is when a human being consumes it.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  122. A darker vision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Me thinks you must be drunk not to see what is happening today and how it will affect tomorrow.

    2006, the Internet collapses 'cause of the spam. Internet2 is irrelevant. MSNet ressurrects and is adopted by every enterprise "by law force".

    2010, Venezuela will be anexed as a new USA State. None speak spanish are found at Venezuela by that year. USA will use the oil from Venezuela to fuel his war against Oil-producer countries form east (Iraq, Kuwait, et caterva), "The Evil East Oil Cartel". "The Cartel" born, mainly an alliance between some key big industries. Two years later, they has one key representant in all relevant areas of economy.

    By 2015, 1/3 of the worl population will die from an accident with some kind of bio-weapon being carried by an USA Navy operation. All people dead will be from Latin America and Africa. Larges amounts of no-men country will be claimed by de USA as "their heritage". Some will be claimed because of stategics (food, mainly). The rest will be claimed because "we say so". "The Cartel" has monopoly in 70% of economy. They dictates laws in all countries hat still has money. Muslims are rare. But not terrorrist attacks (suicidal bombing of ex-USNavy operatives). The MSNet is used as a "The Cartel" marketing tool, fulled with subliminal messages, and government propaganda. They dictates what you will do(buy), how, and when.

    At 2024 (good looking number, don't know why) all "non-american" USA residents are restrited "for safety reasons" to some areas. Press will get all "news" from government agencies and from "The Cartel" representants. No muslims alive. Buddists became "next threat". They respond with mass suicide, after drinking coke. "The Cartel" is the economy, and the market. They provide almost everything to almost everyone. Every time someone shouts "Jump!" everyone answers "How High?" -- no one knows why.

    UNO will be declared dead at 2035. A bomb will kill all the representants till 3rd level of hierarchy. USA will declare UNO irrelevant, and will opose with deadly force to the creation of a new UNO (of course, no war -- noone has money and resources to that). By 2036, saying it's for the good of all, USA will announce that they allways was, are, and will be the sheriff of the world. Resistence is futile. If you do not agree, you are "The Enemy". "The Cartel" assumes the government (not exactly a surprise). Every time someone shouts "Jump!", everybody jumps as high as they can.

    2045, slavery will be declared legal at the free world (USA and some countries not famine at Europe and Asia). Everyone whit blue eyes will have the right to have two brown-eyed slaves. More slaves will be a threat to "natural" resources. No one shouts "Jump!" anymore. Nobody has names too. Even numbers. They respond to a "hey, you!", most of the times.

    2050, "The News" broadcasts an enterview with Osama Bin Laden, retired from working for the USA Government last years of the war against "Evil East Oil Cartel", showing what kind of heroe he was (he blinks and his head shakes terribly, drolls most of the time, and the responses are read by a machine, that "talks" with a texan accent, but he's still alive), and how the world has been wrong about him at 2002, as he never was a muslim, or terrorrist, or both, or anything relevant -- "Evil East Oil Cartel" deceptions. None with two brown-eyes-slaves knows the address of the kitchen. None that has brown-eyes has kitchen. Automation is irrelevant, because the slaves need something to justify their poor lives. Killing a slave for food is illegal only in some parts of the world (not USA). All you can see at TV are the extra-liberal pr0n (with slaves playing active roles), official news, and brazilian soup from the laters 1970's and 1980's. Everything with "The Cartel" subliminal propaganda. Some people stops from jumping convulsively (they where jumping the last 15 years) by the end of the year. There will be no christmas in 2050, 'cause christmas are irrelevant since 2015, subliminal marketing forces everyone to buy all the time, spending all the money with shopping, and there are no christians in the world since the death of the last buddists. Everybody knows that there's no heaven or hell, and no sins, and no hope, and nothing outside of "The Cartel". The cynics agnostics won. There's no humanity too. Freedom is only a word. Lie is another. Ditto for Truth, Honor, Faith, Law and Crime.

    At 2058, with the age of 91, I will die. Natural causes, of course (bullet shot from an blue-eyes, 'cause I'm a very old brown-eyes one, and no one can explain how I can reach that age, even me). The world ends that year. No one feels sorry about anything. No one feels anything.

  123. consumption was, in fact, way *down* this year by sgtron · · Score: 1

    not because people wanted peace on earth or goodwill toward men, but because they don't have freakin' jobs! All major (minor too i suppose) retailers are reporting poor earnings for the holiday season. This was the worst retail event in a long long time.. in short, this christmas was *not* about consumption.

    --
    No todo lo que es oro brilla
  124. At my age... by Inda · · Score: 1

    ...I'll probably be dead in 2050 you insensitive clod(s)

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  125. I wish by Unregistered · · Score: 1

    The only differences between now and 2050 will be the new computer will have an LCD an even more bloated OS, the car in the driveway will be even bigger, and the kid's toys will be louder, move more and need bigger batteries.

  126. I guess its all true about US public schools by alizard · · Score: 2
    Your comparison of the space program to the 1960s to the pyramids means that what you learned about it in school was clearly inadequate. I'll simply say that without it, most of the technological innovations you take for granted that were created in the last 30 years would simply not exist. We wouldn't have personal computers, your living room wouldn't be filled with neat little electronic entertainment project, you wouldn't even have Teflon(tm) coated frying pans. Before the space program, the electronic devices in a living room were a TV and radio and maybe a stereo. Even the phone was basically electromechanical.

    Basically, if it requires miniaturization (like 300M transistors on a chip, before the 60s, transistors were made one at a time), low weight and high strength, you can trace the origins of whatever the product is to the space program.

    Find a copy of Robert Heinlein's Expanded Universe, there's a short article that'll give you the highlights. Advanced Technology Paths to Global Climate Stability is a reprint of that Science article discussing the future alternative energy sources civilization will need when the oil runs out.

    Powersats are on the list. As I see it, we are basically a few years of R&D away from being able to build the kind of space infrastructure that will be required to make building them relatively easy. It's basically a matter of government and major corporations being willing to put major money for a project with 10-15 years before a major return on investment. It's not a matter of discovering new laws of nature, it's a problem that can be solved by throwing money at it.

    Remember that sooner or later, the Third World is going to become industrialized and will have per capita resource requirements comparable to the US and EU. What's left of the world's oil just won't do it.

    With respect to all of us (Americans, I guess) having maids again, either the resource problems of this planet will be solved in such a way that you won't be able to get cheap domestic help from south of the border, or you won't be able to afford it anyway because your tax money at tax rates you don't want to imagine will be going into military expenditures designed to make sure that the US and allied countries have control over what's left of the world's resources.

  127. The Ghost of Christmas Future by z4ce · · Score: 2

    We already have visitors from Christmas of the future here to taunt us with gifts from the future.
    Ian

  128. There's life after meat, ( REALLY ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a vegetarian and I don't give a *$#@ about "meat substitutes". If I want meat I'll eat meat. If I don't want meat I won't eat meat. Why do marketing droids always think "fake meat" is a great advertising line. It's exactly the opposite, especially if it tastes anything like meat !!!

  129. Re:Ya, right...and the DMCA will have been repeall by Myuu · · Score: 1

    However, with AMD's announcement that they arent going to try to compete with Intel as much as before and Intel's admission that in 10 years, Moore's Law will be dead, I kinda doubt it...

    but who knows?

    --

    forget it.
  130. The real 2050 Christmas. by Pheersum · · Score: 1

    As you and your family come forth from your cave into the radiation-scarred wilderness, the sun shines weakly through the black dust clouds. Snow falls down from the sky, but that's nothing special: when doesn't it fall? Gathering wood has become harder in the last few months, as this area has been hit especially hard by the raids of the mutants, so lately you've taken to burning dried dung for your heat.

    You gather your spear, your wife gathers the bucket, one of your few possessions from the Utopia that existed only ... was it 25, or 40 years ago? you ask yourself, but the number escapes you. Father was always a rambler anyway. You will hunt, she will gather food and fuel, in a ritual reminiscent of man's earliest days. Your children, still too young to do either, huddle on the entrance of the cave. You feel a tinge of shame as you notice their ribcages.. there just hasn't been enough food for their growing bodies these days. Too many animals have moved on.

    Clearing your mind, you begin your long hunt. Today you will find meat, because today is Christmas. Whatever that means.

  131. don't forget by geekoid · · Score: 2

    In the future we will be able to eat all the Soylent green we want, on tuesdays.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  132. Population by geekoid · · Score: 2

    the US population is not on the rise.

    Matter of fact, most 'first world' countries have a population that is stable(as far as numbers) , or is diminishing.

    You do have a point thought, what happens when a fast food resturant can replace the cooking staff with a 500,000 dollar auromation unit? Every cook in the fast food industry will not have work with 5 years.
    Si the company that makes them may need to hir 2000 people, but there are a hell of a lot more fastfood prepareers then that.

    Society needs to start thinking about a way to support itself in an enviroment where fewer and fewer people actually need to be working in order to keep things running. If you don't give the people ane avenue to take so they can support themselves, or you do not take care of your people, they will rebel.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  133. It could be worse...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we could have hillary clinton 4!

    Now then we would need a WAR on terror!... AHHhhh!

  134. GW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "
    During the decades after the fallout of nuclear war from WWIII (thank's to our good ol' prez G.W. Bush"

    I bet you said this quote 15 years ago , but with reagon inserted instead of bush.

    youre right , we will read these predictions in the future and luagh...

    shiznit

  135. Too late for me to get noticed by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2
    Alvin Toffler said, in a wired interview in issue 2.01:

    I once had a class of 15-year-old high school kids and I gave them index cards, and I said, "Write down seven things that will happen in the future." They said there would be revolutions and presidents would be assassinated, and we would all drown in ecological sludge. A very dramatic series of events. But I noticed that of the 198 items that they handed in, only six used the word "I." So I gave them another set of cards, and I said, "Now I want you to write down seven things that are going to happen to you." Back came, "I will be married when I'm 21," "I will live in the same neighborhood, I will have a dog."


    Alvin's predictions have always been either uninteresting or ludicrous, imho. However, this point is *so* fantastic.

    Sure, in 47 years we might have nanotech that can create turkeys. But we might also have nanotech that has turned every human into a turkey. Christmas day will be the least interesting distinction between now and 2050. Ok, now I'll go read the article.
    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  136. Doesn't it just figure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was a kid growing up in the late 70's/Early 80's we were always looking forward to the year 2000, so we could enjoy all of the stuff that people in the 1950 said we would have, like robots and video phones, now in the early part of 2000, we're waiting for the 50's to herald in a new era of technology...Its all backward and scientific...and a bit unsetteling

  137. bad bad bad by shokk · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately your bot hits the website for the Anarchist's Cookbook and kills all the guests that eat the C4 mousse.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  138. Deus Ex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone played deus ex? I think that game has a pretty good view of what's going to happen. Some of the technology won't be there yet and the US probably won't still exist in 50 years (yes I truly believe the "election" of gwb marked the beginning of the downfall of this country and most of civilization). Famine will be rampant. Economies will all be in tatters. Religious and pollitical factions will rule over small parts of the world. Deadly diseases will become commonplace EVERYWHERE and medical technology will have been mostly destroyed by war. Hardly anyone will live to be 30. If we're lucky some big rock will hit the earth and kill us all. Yeah I know I'm a total pessimist, but face it....the world is going to hell and there's nothing anyone can ever do to stop it.

  139. Biggest IPO of 2049 by blair1q · · Score: 2


    Acme Foil Hat, LLC

  140. Winter Festival in December 2050 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does not matter what it looks like because it won't be called Christmas - this (as it seems even now) would be viewed as demeaning to those who do not observe the religious aspects of the Holiday and would be offended. It may even become illegal to actually wish someone a Merry Christmas earning the well-wisher a permanent place in some far-away hidden dungeon or perhaps a remote "re-education center"...

  141. Christmas won't exist in 2050 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christmas is an insult to Jesus Christ. Imagine: A bunch of people celebrate your birthday a day that is not at all your birthday, but the birthday of your enemy. They exchange gifts w/o giving anything to you. They picture you as a harmless child, while you're a powerful king.

    Think about it.

  142. Just adding one more line... by Lispy · · Score: 1

    With all the retro movement going on in the car business i wouldn't bet that the cars won't look a bit as in 5th element. Have a look at these:
    http://www.mini.com/
    http://www.vw.com/ne wbeetle/
    http://www.chrysler.com/pt_cruiser/?nav= image
    http://www.fordvehicles.com/fordgt/index.as p?bhfv= 6&bhqs=1

    cu,
    Lispy

  143. who hijacked who? by strombrg · · Score: 1


    Christmas wasn't hijacked by consumption fever.

    Consumption fever was hijacked by christmas.

    Jesus, if he existed, wasn't born in the winter. Christmas was scheduled in December to steal the thunder of "pagan" winter celebrations like Saturnalia, which was about giving presents to children.

  144. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    The Buddha, the Godhead, resides quite as comfortably in the circuits of a
    digital computer or the gears of a cycle transmission as he does at the top
    of a mountain or in the petals of a flower. To think otherwise is to demean
    the Buddha -- which is to demean oneself.
    -- Robert Pirsig, "Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...